Panicked Bitcoiner mistakenly pays over $70K of BTC in fees
08 Abril 2025 - 8:03AM
Cointelegraph


One presumably panicked Bitcoin user paid nearly 0.75 BTC
($70,500) in a replace-by-fee (RBF) transaction fee.
The
transaction in question was sent about 30 minutes after
midnight UTC on April 8. It was the second attempt at performing an
RBF
that changed the transaction's target address, sending 0.48 Bitcoin
($37,770) with 0.2 BTC of change ($16,357).
Second Bitcoin RBF transaction. Source:
Mempool.Space
Anmol Jain, vice president of investigations at crypto forensics
firm AMLBot, told Cointelegraph that the original transaction
featured a “default or conservative” fee. The first RBF raised the
fee to nearly double the amount and changed the output address.
Both of those transactions are waiting for a confirmation that
will never come. This is because the much higher fee RBF
transaction took its place with the same output as the second RBF
transaction — presumably, an attempt to bump the fee to ensure that
the RBF is processed rather than the original transaction.
Related:
How to fix a stuck Bitcoin transaction in 2025: A
step-by-step guide
A presumed panic-induced error
The transaction has signs of a panic-induced error, with the
user sending a subsequent transaction fast to prevent the original
transaction from being included in a block and becoming final. Jain
suggested some potential explanations:
“Maybe he meant to use 30.5692 sat but, due to haste or
butter fingers, ended up using 305,692 sat.“
The second RBF transaction also added an additional input
unspent transaction output (UTXO). This UTXO contained nearly
0.75 Bitcoin (BTC). The
change was mistakenly included as part of the fee, likely because
the user failed to update the change address or misjudged the
transaction’s structure.
Another possibility raised by Jain is that the user got confused
between a fee in absolute terms and one set in satoshi per virtual
byte (transaction size) or that the automated script behind the
transaction contained a bug. The wallet could allow setting a fee
in satoshis, which could lead to a scenario where the fee is set
way too low, a warning about the low fee and an overcorrection:
“System reads it as 30 sats total fee, which is way too
low, so user types 305000 thinking it means 30.5 sat/vB, and the
wallet actually applies 305,000 sats/vB, which is
insane.“
Related:
Bitcoin user pays $3.1M transaction fee for 139 BTC
transfer
Replace-by-fee: a controversial feature
RBF is a widely misunderstood and controversial feature of
Bitcoin.
Bitcoin transactions are considered non-final until they are
included in a block, with further confirmation by more blocks in
the same chain.
Transactions in the mempool are at the mercy of miners — who are
expected to be profit-driven. Bitcoin developers foresaw that with
multiple conflicting Bitcoin transactions, the financial incentive
would be to process the one paying the higher fee.
There is no easy way to prevent Bitcoin miners from simply
including the transaction that was sent first, and it is also not
straightforward to establish which transaction was submitted first
due to the decentralized nature of the network. Consequently, this
incentive was recognized in the RBF feature, allowing users to edit
unconfirmed transactions by submitting an alternative transaction
with a higher fee.
This led to some controversies in the past, with Bitcoin Cash
(BCH)
proponent Hayden Otto
claiming that RBFs allowed for Bitcoin double-spends back in
2019. In contrast, Bitcoin Cash has removed the feature and claimed
that unconfirmed transactions sent on that network are final and
secure to accept.
Still, with the way blockchains function, RBF-like transactions
were confirmed to occasionally occur on Bitcoin Cash either way.
This is because RBF is just an implied property of a Bitcoin-like
consensus mechanism that was formalized as a feature.
Magazine:
I became an Ordinals RBF sniper to get rich… but I lost
most of my Bitcoin
...
Continue reading Panicked Bitcoiner mistakenly pays
over $70K of BTC in fees
The post
Panicked Bitcoiner mistakenly pays over $70K of BTC
in fees appeared first on
CoinTelegraph.
Bitcoin Cash (COIN:BCHUSD)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Mai 2025 até Jun 2025
Bitcoin Cash (COIN:BCHUSD)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jun 2024 até Jun 2025