By Jay Greene
Amazon.com Inc. tested a pop-up feature on its app that in some
instances pitched its private-label goods on rivals' product pages,
an experiment that shows the e-commerce giant's aggressiveness in
hawking lower-priced products including its own house brands.
The recent experiment, conducted in Amazon's mobile app, went a
step further than the display ads that commonly appear within
search results and product pages. This test pushed pop-up windows
that took over much of a product page, forcing customers to either
click through to the lower-cost Amazon products or dismiss them
before continuing to shop.
When a customer using Amazon's mobile app searched for "AAA
batteries," for example, the first link was a sponsored listing
from Energizer Holdings Inc. After clicking on the listing, a
pop-up window appeared, offering less expensive AmazonBasics AAA
batteries.
The limited experiment, which ended last week, highlights the
power Amazon holds over brands on its home turf. In its quest to
offer the best selection at the lowest price, Amazon has created
more than a hundred in-house brands, from batteries and trash bags
to nutritional supplements and furniture.
Amazon's private-label brands have chipped away at market share
in some categories, such as batteries, and the company actively
advertises its products throughout the site. Consumer-product
manufacturers have found Amazon increasingly important because the
website accounts for roughly half of all U.S. sales online.
The test, which didn't appear on every customer's mobile device,
ran on top of both sponsored and non-sponsored listings. Amazon
also said it pitched lower-cost alternatives from other brands, but
it didn't specify which ones.
Amazon said the pop-up windows weren't ads, but rather a test of
a feature to help shoppers find cheaper alternatives. The group
that developed the test was from Amazon's retail business, not its
advertising operations. The company declined to discuss the results
of the experiment.
"We regularly experiment with new shopping experiences for
customers, and this was a small test," the company said. "The
similar, lower-priced product options shown to customers featured
relevant items from a range of brands on our website and were
displayed when a customer clicked on any type of listing."
The Wall Street Journal last week conducted dozens of product
searches in a variety of categories in the mobile app, clicking on
the first several products listed including those from Amazon. The
Journal found three instances of the pop-up ads, which took up
about half of a nearly 6-inch iPhone screen and which all touted
Amazon products on rival pages. The ads didn't show on several
other phones tested under different user accounts.
One company whose sponsored-listing page was targeted, Nested
Naturals Inc., only found out about the test through social media,
its co-founder and chief marketing officer, Kevin Pasco, said.
Before mobile shoppers included in the experiment could buy Luna
sleeping pills from the Vancouver-based supplement company for
$21.95, they were offered a pop-up window hawking an $11.99 vial of
melatonin pills from Amazon Elements. The pop-up included the tag
"Similar item, lower price" with a link to the Amazon product.
Mr. Pasco described the tactic as "sneaky," though he said
building a business on Amazon requires "having a stomach of steel
and taking whatever they throw at us."
Nested Naturals sold about $10 million of its supplements on
Amazon last year, roughly 85% of its business, he said. That makes
it easier to roll with Amazon's efforts to compete against Nested
Naturals, Mr. Pasco said. The experiment, he added, had no
discernible impact on Luna sales.
"We try to be a little less emotional and say this is Amazon
being Amazon," Mr. Pasco said.
In the Energizer example, Amazon's pop-up appeared in a
sponsored listing for a 24-pack of MAX Premium AAA batteries priced
at $12.14. The rival 36-count AmazonBasics batteries cost
$8.99.
An Energizer spokeswoman declined to comment.
Another target of Amazon's test was Clorox Co.'s Glad Products
Co. and its 110-count of tall kitchen trash bags for $19.06. The
pop-up touted Amazon's Solimo bags for $14.49. A Clorox spokeswoman
didn't respond to a request for comment.
Like many big-box retailers in physical stores, Amazon is taking
premium space to sell its own generic products. But unlike placing
generic acetaminophen on a shelf next to Tylenol, Amazon's test
forced consumers to dismiss the option of viewing alternatives
before they could continue with a purchase.
Amazon declined to say if it notified the advertisers when the
test usurped sponsored listings or if it refunded sponsored-ad
payments.
The company is increasingly finding ways to monetize the space
on its website, especially as it forges deeper into the advertising
business. Shoppers are encountering a variety of sponsored ads,
whether at the top of search results with sponsored listings that
look similar to regular listings, or within product pages in a
number of formats.
Last fall, The Wall Street Journal reported that Amazon for more
than a year wove sponsored product listings from Johnson &
Johnson and Kimberly-Clark Corp., onto consumers' baby registries
that led some shoppers into believing the new parents had chosen
the items. Amazon said it has since phased out the sponsored
listings on the baby registries.
Amazon's sales of private-label goods on its website received
increased scrutiny last week when Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a
Massachusetts Democrat running for president, proposed banning
large companies from participating in the platforms they have
created. She specifically called for splitting AmazonBasics from
the company's marketplace business.
Write to Jay Greene at Jay.Greene@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
March 15, 2019 09:28 ET (13:28 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Fev 2024 até Mar 2024
Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Mar 2023 até Mar 2024