Apple Violated Qualcomm Patent, U.S. Trade Judge Rules --2nd Update
26 Março 2019 - 8:08PM
Dow Jones News
By Asa Fitch and Tripp Mickle
Apple Inc. and Qualcomm Inc. each notched victories from a U.S.
trade body in their yearslong feud over patent licensing, hardening
the divide between them ahead of a federal trial slated to begin
next month.
Apple netted the more significant victory Tuesday, with a ruling
by members of the U.S. International Trade Commission that the
iPhone maker didn't violate a patent held by its former chip
supplier. That ruling effectively overturned an ITC administrative
judge's finding in September that Apple had violated a Qualcomm
patent related to power efficiency in mobile phones.
A less-definitive decision came just hours earlier from another
ITC administrative judge in a separate patent claim by Qualcomm. In
that case, the judge issued an initial finding against Apple and
recommended a limited ban on iPhone imports. That recommendation is
still subject to review by the ITC -- a six-member group that
currently has one open slot -- and potentially by the Trump
administration.
A Qualcomm representative didn't immediately provide
comment.
An Apple spokesman said the ITC's finding that Qualcomm's patent
claim was invalid was an important step to preserving fair
competition. He added, "We look forward to detailing the many ways
they're harming consumers and stifling innovation when we present
our case in San Diego next month."
Shares of Qualcomm ended Tuesday's regular trading session up
2.4%, but slid slightly after hours following news of the second
decision. Apple shares ended down 1%, then edged up after
hours.
Qualcomm's complaints against Apple to the ITC are part of a
world-spanning legal battle between the companies that could
determine how much revenue Apple must share from its most important
product at a time of slowing global smartphone sales.
The fight started in early 2017, when Apple sued Qualcomm in
federal court in San Diego, alleging the chip maker extracted
extortionate rates for patent licenses by leveraging its dominance
in the modem-chip market.
The legal tug-of-war has cost both sides millions of dollars
without producing a clear victor. With neither side ascendant, both
are digging in ahead of their trial, set to start next month.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission also filed suit against
Qualcomm in 2017, focusing on the chip company's allegedly
monopolistic practices. Qualcomm, which denies the claims and says
its pricing practices are fair, has countered by alleging that
Apple violated its patents in Germany, China, the U.S. and other
jurisdictions. Judge Lucy Koh, who is overseeing the FTC case, is
expected to make a decision in the coming weeks.
In a separate case brought by Qualcomm, a jury in San Diego this
month found that Apple violated the same Qualcomm patent that ITC
commissioners ruled on Tuesday. The jury awarded Qualcomm $31
million in damages for Apple's violation of three patents.
Qualcomm long supplied Apple with modem chips, which handle
wireless connectivity to mobile networks. But in a widening battle
between the companies, Apple has stopped using Qualcomm modem chips
since the iPhone XS's release in 2018.
Qualcomm had filed both of its ITC cases in 2017, arguing that
Apple was violating patents covering techniques to handle data
efficiently and extend battery life on mobile phones.
The ITC administrative judge's decision on Tuesday means Apple
may not be out of the woods. Judge MaryJoan McNamara recommended
that some iPhones be barred from import, although her two-page
order didn't specify which iPhone models it covered.
Even if the ITC commissioners agree with Judge McNamara's
decision, the White House could step in before any import ban took
place. Presidents have vetoed ITC moves before, including in 2013
when the Obama administration prevented an ITC ban on the sale of
some iPhones and iPads from taking effect after Samsung Electronics
Co. won a case there.
Write to Asa Fitch at asa.fitch@wsj.com and Tripp Mickle at
Tripp.Mickle@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
March 26, 2019 18:53 ET (22:53 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Mar 2024 até Abr 2024
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Abr 2023 até Abr 2024