By Joanna Stern | Photography by Kenny Wassus/The Wall Street Journal In the great work-from-home room
Sat two Apple laptops connected to Zoom.
Within both machines dwelt speedy M1 chips
Making them sound less than ever like spaceships.
Goodnight MacBook Pro,
Goodnight MacBook Air,
Goodnight -- forever -- laptop noises everywhere.
OK, so my children's book tour might be indefinitely delayed,
but Apple's new M1-chip laptops are right on time. For real, they
aren't only the quietest ever, they change everything you've come
to hate about your laptop over the last couple of...decades.
Fans that sound like your machine is attempting to cool the
Sahara? Palms sweating over a roasting laptop? Battery life that
drops faster than the New Year's Eve ball? With the new $999-and-up
MacBook Air and $1,299-and-up 13-inch MacBook Pro, which go on sale
on Tuesday, those will just be travails you tell your grandkids
about. Plus, getting one of these doesn't mean giving up speed --
they're even faster than their respective predecessors, released
just earlier this year.
How is that possible? Apple's new M1 chip, that's how.
Instead of using the Intel chips found in Macs for the last 14
years, Apple swapped in its own -- while keeping the external
designs of the laptops, including the keyboards that actually work.
Based on Arm architecture, which powers most mobile devices
including iPhones and iPads, the M1 is far more power efficient. It
means crazy cool temperatures, 10 or more hours of battery life and
insanely quiet performance.
It also means the ability to run your favorite iPad and iPhone
apps. That is, if your favorite apps are Wendy's, Dunkin' and other
fast-food chains. Fine, there's also Zillow and quite a few popular
iOS games, including "Among Us," but overall, the selection of top
apps is limited. If developers don't want their apps to be
available for these MacBooks -- perhaps because the software won't
play nice with a non-touch-screen device -- they won't show up in
the Mac App Store.
Put that aside, though, and you've got the best Mac laptops ever
-- frankly, the best laptops ever, period. Now that the Air and Pro
have the same chips, the question isn't "Do I buy?" but "Which do I
buy?"
After a week of intensive testing of both products alongside
their Intel counterparts, the answer comes down to this: How much
performance and battery life do you want to pay for?
Fan or No Fan?
It's pretty simple: These computers are fast -- blink-of-an-eye
wake-up fast. Processing and graphics benchmark tests say they're
up to 2.5 times faster than their Intel counterparts, but I don't
live in benchmarks, and neither do you.
I live in 30 or so browser tabs (these days Safari or Microsoft
Edge) plus Slack, constant group video calls via Zoom or Google
Meet, Apple Music, Microsoft Word and Apple's Notes and Messages.
When doing most of that simultaneously -- hooked up to a 27-inch 4K
LG monitor -- both machines had a pep in their step. Unlike my
Intel MacBook Air or the even 16-inch MacBook Pro I often use, I
saw very few slow downs, no spinning rainbow balls, no fan noise.
Ever.
Some quick Computer Science 101: The Intel chips in your laptop,
which are based on x86 architecture, are quite power hungry. More
power = more heat = one noisy fan.
Apple's M1 chip, however, is far more power efficient. Less
power = less heat = no fan. The new MacBook Air has a completely
fanless design, while the MacBook Pro still has a fan to allow for
sustained high speeds.
So of course I deemed it my mission to get these laptops to slow
down, heat up or -- in the case of the MacBook Pro -- fire up the
fan.
As you'll see in the video, I tried it all, beginning with
Google Chrome, the most resource-intensive browser of them all.
Fifty browsing tabs? Not at a peep or a degree above 80 Fahrenheit
on either M1-powered system. The Intel-powered Air? Thirty-five
tabs got its fans revving, and it hit 93 degrees.
How about 65 tabs? The M1-powered Air was still cool and quiet,
though it began showing signs of sluggish scrolling and tab
switching. The Intel-powered 13-inch MacBook Pro powered up its fan
at around 75 tabs. At a whopping 100 tabs -- which no sane human
could ever navigate -- the M1-powered Pro was quiet as a mouse and
scrolling pages smoothly. Even when I threw in a Zoom call, it kept
silent. I finally got the new MacBook Pro's fan to kick on, with a
temperature of 98 degrees, when playing "Rise of Tomb Raider" while
simultaneously exporting a 4K video in Adobe Premiere and running
some Chrome tabs in the background.
An Intel spokesman said the company believes the PCs powered by
its processors, including its latest-generation mobile chips,
"provide global customers the best experience in areas they value
most, as well as the most open platform for developers." He also
said Intel is focused on delivering "a wide range of technology
choices that redefine computing."
Overall, I found the MacBook Pro to be speedier than the Air.
This is due to the fan, which allows it to maintain peak
performance for longer, and also because my MacBook Pro review unit
had 16 gigabytes of RAM, twice the RAM of the Air.
All-Day Battery or All-Day Battery?
I'd say these new laptops will let you confidently leave home
for a day -- even two days -- without a charger. But who knows when
we're actually leaving home again? (Unlike, the new iPhones, the
new Macs do ship with chargers. Big, chunky ones.)
For now, it means hours and hours untethered. It's hard to tally
how much actual daily use I got because of on-and-off usage
patterns but on the MacBook Air, it was close to 8 hours. On the
Pro, it was closer to 10.
My punishing YouTube test, where I streamed a video with display
brightness set at 65%, showed crazy gains over the Intel
counterparts. The M1-powered Air went for 10 hours and 45 minutes;
the Intel version eight hours. The M1-powered Pro, because of the
bigger battery in its thicker body, went for 16 hours -- nearly
twice the Intel MacBook Pro's 8.5 hours. The Dell XPS 13 lasted
10.5 hours.
The big differences between the Air and the Pro really end
there. The Pro has a slightly brighter screen, louder speakers and
a better microphone. Oh, and yes, the Touch Bar, Apple's
unnecessary strip of controls.
Both have fingerprint sensors in the upper right of the keyboard
for quick logins and Apple Pay payments. They're also limited to
just two USB-C ports on the left edge. Truly, does no one at Apple
sleep on the right side of the bed?
My other complaint: Both are still saddled with 720p webcams.
Seriously? On Planet Zoom? While the M1 improves noise reduction
and white balance, the cameras pale in comparison to any we
recommend in our ultimate video-chat guide.
Mac App or iPad App?
I anticipated software and app issues as a result of the
transition in silicon. I was wrong. Thanks to Apple's Rosetta 2
technology, which is built into the newly released Mac OS Big Sur,
all the Intel Mac apps I typically use worked well on these
machines. Everything from Microsoft Word to Chrome ran
smoothly.
Universal Apps, tweaked to run on both Intel chips and Apple's
new chips, should perform even snappier. I tried Pixelmator Pro, a
popular photo-editing app for Macs, and it felt smooth, even
dealing with large files.
I was excited about the prospect of using iPad and iPhone apps,
which now appear in the Mac App Store. However, none of my most
used iPhone apps are there. Instagram? Nope. Gmail? Nope. Seamless?
Nope. Nest? Nope. TikTok? Nope. I could go on and on. Most of those
companies told me their services were accessible through
web-browser-based apps.
I did have some mild success. Facebook's iPad app works well,
except when it nagged me about opening an unavailable Messenger iOS
app. I do like playing "Among Us" on the bigger screen, but certain
finger controls don't respond as well to mouse clicks.
You know what would solve a lot of app compatibility issues? A
touch screen. On touch-enabled Windows laptops and Chromebooks, I'm
constantly tapping the screen here and there to navigate
touch-designed apps, even though I mainly still use the trackpad.
Not to mention, MacOS Big Sur's new iOS-inspired menus and widgets
look like they're crying out to be touched.
While I'd choose the new Pro over the new Air, they're both
great. And they both point to a future enabled by these new chips,
where the differences among our phones, laptops and tablets aren't
dictated by constraints of power and performance but by the
creativity of the designers.
So good night to MacBooks overheating too much,
Goodnight to you all, yelling at them to "Shush!"
Write to Joanna Stern at joanna.stern@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
November 17, 2020 09:14 ET (14:14 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Mar 2024 até Abr 2024
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Abr 2023 até Abr 2024