EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION INFORMATION | Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Our Compensation
Committee and Management Roles. Our Compensation Committee
requests that the CEO be present at committee meetings where
compensation and corporate performance are discussed and evaluated.
The CEO is encouraged to provide insight, suggestions or
recommendations regarding executive compensation if present during
these meetings or at other times. However, only independent
committee members are allowed to vote on decisions made regarding
executive compensation. In making its determinations with respect
to executive compensation, the committee is supported by CEIX’s
Chief Administrative Officer, its General Counsel and Mercer, the
committee’s independent compensation consultant. While the
committee meets with the CEO to discuss his own compensation
package, ultimately, decisions regarding the CEO’s compensation are
made by the committee in executive session without the CEO or any
other executive officer present, solely based upon the committee’s
deliberations. Decisions regarding other NEOs who report directly
to the CEO are also made by the committee (or Board, in the case of
equity grants, absent a delegation to the committee or CEO) after
considering recommendations from the CEO, Mercer and the Chief
Administrative Officer.
CEIX Compensation
Consultant. Our Compensation Committee retained Mercer as
an independent compensation consultant directly, although in
carrying out its assignments, Mercer also interacts with CEIX
management when necessary and appropriate. Specifically, the Chief
Administrative Officer, responsible for Human Resources matters,
including executive compensation, interacts with the consultant to
provide compensation data, best practices data, and executive
compensation trends. In addition, Mercer may, in its discretion,
seek input and feedback from executives regarding its consulting
work product prior to the presentation to the Compensation
Committee to ensure alignment with CEIX’s business strategy, to
determine that additional data may need to be gathered, or to
identify other issues, if any, prior to the presentation to the
Compensation Committee. Annually, the Compensation Committee
reviews with management the independence of any compensation
consultant it retains. In February 2022, the Compensation Committee
conducted an independence review of Mercer by analyzing the factors
mandated by the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange
and concluded that there were no conflicts of interest arising from
Mercer’s work. In 2021, CEIX paid Mercer $41,660 in connection with
its work providing executive compensation consulting to the
Compensation Committee.
Besides Mercer’s involvement with the Compensation
Committee, it and its affiliates also provide other nonexecutive
compensation services to us. Neither the Board nor the Compensation
Committee reviewed or approved these other services, as these other
services were approved by management in the ordinary course of
business. The total amount paid for these other services provided
in 2021 was $5,052,914, consisting of $2,657,015 paid to Mercer for
health and wealth consulting services and $2,395,899 paid to
Mercer’s parent company, Marsh & McLennan Companies, for
property/casualty insurance consulting and brokerage services. The
Compensation Committee determined that the other services provided
did not raise any conflicts of interest.
2021 Compensation Actions
and Programs in Effect
2021 Peer
Group. The Compensation Committee selected the
following 12 publicly-traded companies (the “Peer Group”) based on
the recommendation of Mercer, which includes companies in the coal
and energy industry similar in revenue size to CEIX and with
industry and business characteristics comparable to CEIX in terms
of revenue and market cap and with whom we compete for talent. The
Compensation Committee does not target a particular percentile
within the Peer Group in setting an NEO’s compensation, but uses
the Peer Group compensation data as one of several reference points
in determining the form and amount of compensation. The
Compensation Committee also uses general industry competitive
market data to evaluate our NEO total compensation packages.
|
|
|
Alliance Resources Partners, L.P. |
|
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation |
Arch Resources, Inc. |
|
NACCO Industries, Inc. |
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. |
|
Natural Resources Partners L.P. |
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. |
|
Peabody Energy Corporation |
Compass Minerals International, Inc. |
|
SunCoke Energy, Inc. |
Hallador Energy Company |
|
Warrior Met Coal, Inc. |
Base Salaries.
In January 2022, Mercer presented to the Compensation Committee its
review of the compensation of our NEOs. Based on this review, the
Compensation Committee determined to increase the base salaries for
Mr. Thakkar, Mr. Salvatori, Ms. Wiegand and
Mr. Rothka to align their base salaries with appropriate
comparable levels of peer companies or comparable positions with
other similar companies and also to adjust for internal pay
|
|
|
28 |
|
– 2022 Proxy Statement |