Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should consider carefully
the following information about the risks described below, together with the other information contained in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and in our other public filings, in evaluating our business. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial
condition, results of operations, and future growth prospects would likely be materially and adversely affected. In these circumstances,
the market price of our common stock would likely decline. The following risk factors amend and restate in their entirety the Risk Factors
set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022:
Risks Related to Our Financial Condition
We have a limited operating history and have never generated
any revenues.
We are a clinical stage
biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history that may make it difficult to evaluate the success of our business to date
and to assess our future viability. Our operations have been limited to organizing and staffing the Company, business planning, raising
capital, developing our pipeline assets (TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride), identifying product candidates, and other research and development.
Although our employees have made regulatory submissions and conducted successful clinical trials in the past across many therapeutic
areas while employed at other companies, we have not yet demonstrated an ability to successfully complete any clinical trials and have
never completed the development of any product candidate, nor have we ever generated any revenue from product sales or otherwise. Consequently,
we have no meaningful operations upon which to evaluate our business, and predictions about our future success or viability may not be
as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history or a history of successfully developing and commercializing biopharmaceutical
products.
We expect to incur significant expenses
and significant losses for the foreseeable future and may never generate revenue or achieve or maintain profitability.
Investment in biopharmaceutical
product development is highly speculative because it entails substantial upfront capital and significant risk that a product candidate
will fail to gain regulatory approval or become commercially viable. We have never generated any revenues, and cannot estimate with precision
the extent of our future losses. We expect to incur increasing levels of operating losses for the foreseeable future as we execute on
the plan to continue research and development activities, including the ongoing and planned clinical development of our product candidates,
potentially acquire new products and/or product candidates, seek regulatory approvals of and potentially commercialize any approved product
candidates, hire additional personnel, protect our intellectual property, and incur the additional costs of operating as a public company.
We expect to continue to incur significant and increasing operating losses and negative cash flows for the foreseeable future. These
losses have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our financial position and working capital.
To become and remain profitable,
we must develop or acquire and eventually commercialize a product with significant market potential. This will require us to be successful
in a range of challenging activities, including completing preclinical studies and clinical trials, obtaining marketing approval, manufacturing,
marketing and selling any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval, and satisfying post-marketing requirements, if any.
We may never succeed in these activities and, even if we succeed in obtaining approval for and commercializing one or more products,
we may never generate revenues that are significant enough to achieve profitability. In addition, as a young business, we may encounter
unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other known and unknown challenges. Furthermore, because of the numerous
risks and uncertainties associated with biopharmaceutical product development, we are unable to accurately predict the timing or amount
of increased expenses or when, or if, we will be able to achieve profitability. If we achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain
or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis and may continue to incur substantial research and development and other expenditures
to develop and market additional product candidates. Our failure to become and remain profitable would decrease the value of us and could
impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, expand the business or continue operations. A decline
in our value could also cause you to lose all or part of your investment.
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and
other macroeconomic factors could materially and adversely impact our business, including our clinical development plans and non-clinical
research.
As a result of the COVID-19
pandemic and the associated health and safety measures that were imposed, we have and, in the event of a resurgence of the pandemic or
the onset of another public health crisis, may again experience disruptions that could severely impact our business, including but not
limited to delays or difficulties in clinical trial site operations and in the enrollment, scheduling and retention of patients in our
clinical trials; interruption of key manufacturing, research and clinical development and other activities; and delays or difficulties
conducting and completing non-clinical studies.
In addition, macroeconomic factors, including supply chain disruptions,
rising inflation and resulting increases in interest rates, which are, in part, tied to the lasting impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic,
have and will continue to have an impact on our operations. Similarly, if banks and financial institutions enter receivership or become
insolvent in the future due to financial conditions affecting the banking system and financial markets, there could be an adverse effect
on our ability to access our cash, cash equivalents and investments, including transferring funds, making payments or receiving funds,
any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
If we are not able to respond
to and manage the impact of such events effectively, our business will be harmed.
To the extent the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic or other macroeconomic
factors adversely affect our business and results of operations, they may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks
and uncertainties described elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section.
We will need to raise additional financing
in the future to fund our operations, which may not be available to us on favorable terms or at all.
We will require substantial
additional funds to conduct the costly and time-consuming preclinical studies and clinical trials necessary to pursue regulatory approval
of each potential product candidate and to continue the development of TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride in new indications or uses. Our
future capital requirements will depend upon a number of factors, including: the number and timing of future product candidates in the
pipeline; progress with and results from preclinical testing and clinical trials; the ability to manufacture sufficient drug supplies
to complete preclinical and clinical trials; the costs involved in preparing, filing, acquiring, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing
patent and other intellectual property claims; and the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals and favorable reimbursement
or formulary acceptance. Raising additional capital may be costly or difficult to obtain and could significantly dilute stockholders’
ownership interests and divert our management’s focus on achieving our business objectives. As a result of economic conditions,
general global economic uncertainty, U.S. and foreign political conditions, and other factors, we do not know whether additional capital
will be available when needed, or that, if available, we will be able to obtain additional capital on reasonable terms. Further, rising
inflation has, in part, caused a disruption in the capital markets and an increase in interest rates, which may lead to a recession or
market correction that could impact our access to capital, increase the cost of capital, and could in the future negatively affect our
liquidity. A recession or market correction, inflation and/or further increases in interest rates could materially affect our business
and the value of our common stock.
If we raise additional funds
through public or private equity offerings, the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely
affect the rights of our common stockholders. Further, to the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of common stock
or securities convertible or exchangeable into common stock, the ownership interests of our common stockholders will be diluted. In addition,
any debt financing may subject us to fixed payment obligations and covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions,
such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional capital through marketing
and distribution arrangements or other collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have
to relinquish certain valuable intellectual property or other rights to our product candidates, technologies, future revenue streams
or research programs or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. Even if we were to obtain sufficient funding, there
can be no assurance that it will be available on terms acceptable to us or our stockholders.
Our ability to use our net operating loss
carryforwards and certain other tax attributes to offset future taxable income or taxes may be limited.
Under current law, federal net operating losses
incurred in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such federal net
operating losses in tax years beginning after December 31, 2020 is limited to 80% of taxable income. It is uncertain if and to what extent
various states and localities will conform to federal tax laws. In addition, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, and corresponding provisions of state law, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change” which is
generally defined as a greater than 50% change in its equity ownership value over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability
to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post- change income or taxes
may be limited. We have experienced ownership changes in the past and we may also experience additional ownership changes in the future
as a result of subsequent shifts in our stock ownership, some of which may be outside of our control. If an ownership change occurs and
our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards is materially limited, it would harm our future operating results by effectively
increasing our future tax obligations. In addition, at the state level, there may be periods during which the use of net operating loss
carryforwards is suspended or otherwise limited, which could accelerate or permanently increase state taxes owed. As a result, if we
earn net taxable income, we may be unable to use all or a material portion of our net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes,
which could potentially result in increased future tax liability to us and adversely affect our future cash flows.
Risks Related to Drug/Biologics Development
and Commercialization
Our business depends on the successful
clinical development and regulatory approval of our product candidates, including TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride.
The success of our business,
including our ability to finance our operations and generate revenue in the future, primarily depends on the successful development and
regulatory approval of our product candidates, including of TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride. The clinical success of TARA-002 and IV
Choline Chloride depend on a number of factors, including the following:
| ● | the
timely and successful completion of planned and ongoing preclinical studies and clinical trials, including our ongoing Phase 1 clinical
trial of TARA-002 in NMIBC and our planned Phase 2 clinical trial of TARA-002 in LMs, which may be significantly slower or costlier than
we currently anticipate and/or produce results that do not achieve the endpoints of the trials; |
| ● | the
results of our prevalence study and our enhanced understanding of the PN patient population as part of our IV Choline Chloride program; |
| ● | whether
we are required by the FDA or similar foreign regulatory agencies to conduct additional studies beyond those planned to support the approval
and commercialization of TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride; |
| ● | achieving
and maintaining, and, where applicable, ensuring that our third-party contractors achieve and maintain compliance with their contractual
obligations and with all regulatory requirements applicable to TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride; |
| ● | the
ability of third parties with whom we contract to manufacture adequate clinical trial and commercial supplies of TARA-002 and IV Choline
Chloride, to remain in good standing with regulatory agencies and to develop, validate and maintain commercially viable manufacturing
processes that are compliant with current good manufacturing practices, or cGMP; |
| ● | a
continued acceptable safety profile during clinical development and following approval of TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride; and |
| ● | the
existence of a regulatory environment conducive to the successful development of TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride. |
If any one of these factors
is not present, many of which are beyond our control, we could experience significant delays or an inability to obtain regulatory approval
of TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride.
Our clinical trials
may fail to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates, or serious adverse or unacceptable side effects may be identified
during their development, which could increase our costs or necessitate the abandonment or limitation of the development of the product
candidate.
We have never completed a clinical trial
or made a BLA or NDA submission and may be unable to successfully do so for TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride.
The conduct of a clinical
trial is a long, expensive, complicated and highly regulated process. Although our employees have conducted successful clinical trials
and made regulatory submissions in the past across many therapeutic areas while employed at other companies, we, as a company, have not
completed any clinical trials, or submitted a BLA or NDA and as a result may require more time and incur greater costs than we anticipate.
Failure to commence or complete, or delays in clinical trials or planned regulatory submissions would prevent us from, or delay us, in
obtaining regulatory approval of and commercializing TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride, which would adversely impact our financial performance.
We rely, and expect to continue to rely,
on third-party CROs and other third parties to conduct and oversee our clinical trials. If these third parties do not meet our requirements
or otherwise conduct the trials as required, we may not be able to satisfy our contractual obligations or obtain regulatory approval for,
or commercialize, our product candidates.
We rely, and expect to continue
to rely, on third-party CROs to conduct and oversee our TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride clinical trials and studies and other aspects
of product development. We also rely on various medical institutions, clinical investigators and contract laboratories to conduct our
trials in accordance with our clinical protocols and all applicable regulatory requirements, including the FDA’s regulations and
cGCP, requirements, which are an international standard meant to protect the rights and health of patients and to define the roles of
clinical trial sponsors, administrators and monitors, and state regulations governing the handling, storage, security and record-keeping
for drug and biologic products. These CROs and other third parties have and will continue to play a significant role in the conduct of
these trials and the subsequent collection and analysis of data from the clinical trials. We will rely heavily on these parties for the
execution of our clinical trials and preclinical studies and will control only certain aspects of their activities. We and our CROs and
other third-party contractors will be required to comply with cGCP and cGLP, requirements, which are regulations and guidelines enforced
by the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Regulatory authorities enforce these cGCP and cGLP requirements through periodic
inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators and trial sites. If we or any of these third parties fail to comply with applicable
cGCP and cGLP requirements, or reveal non-compliance from an audit or inspection, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may
be deemed unreliable and the FDA or other regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving
our or our partners’ marketing applications. We cannot assure that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory
authority will determine that any of our clinical trials or preclinical studies comply with applicable cGCP and cGLP requirements. In
addition, our clinical trials generally must be conducted with product candidate produced under cGMP regulations. Our failure to comply
with these regulations and policies may require us to repeat clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.
If any of our CROs or clinical
trial sites fail to comply with their contractual commitments or terminate their involvement in one of our clinical trials for any reason,
we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs or clinical trial sites or do so on commercially reasonable terms.
In addition, if our relationship with clinical trial sites is terminated, we may experience the loss of follow-up information on patients
enrolled in our clinical trials unless we are able to transfer the care of those patients to another qualified clinical trial site. In
addition, principal investigators for our clinical trials may serve as scientific advisors or consultants to us from time to time and
could receive cash or equity compensation in connection with such services. If these relationships and any related compensation result
in perceived or actual conflicts of interest, the integrity of the data generated at the applicable clinical trial site may be questioned
by the FDA.
Interim, topline and preliminary data from
our clinical trials may change as more patient data become available, and are subject to audit and verification procedures that could
result in material changes in the final data.
From time to time, we may
publicly disclose preliminary, interim or topline data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials, which is based on a preliminary
analysis of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change as patient enrollment and
treatment continues and more patient data become available. Adverse differences between previous preliminary or interim data and future
interim or final data could significantly harm our business prospects. We may also announce topline data following the completion of a
preclinical study or clinical trial, which may be subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data related to the particular
study or trial. We also make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and we may not have
received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the interim, topline or preliminary results that
we report may differ from future results of the same studies, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once
additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Preliminary, interim, or topline data also remain subject to audit and verification
procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the data we previously published. Accordingly, preliminary,
interim, and topline data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available.
Further, others, including
regulatory agencies, may not accept or agree with our assumptions, estimates, calculations, conclusions or analyses or may interpret
or weigh the importance of data differently, which could impact the value of the particular program, the approvability or commercialization
of the particular product candidate or product and our company in general. In addition, the information we choose to publicly disclose
regarding a particular study or clinical trial is based on what is typically extensive information, and you or others may not agree with
what we determine to be material or otherwise appropriate information to include in our disclosure.
We are expanding our clinical development
of our product candidates to clinical trial sites outside the United States, and the FDA and applicable foreign regulatory authorities
may not accept data from such sites.
We are expanding our clinical
development of TARA-002 in NMIBC to clinical trial sites outside the United States and may in the future choose to conduct one or more
of our full clinical trials outside of the United States. Although the FDA or applicable foreign regulatory authority may accept data
from clinical trials conducted outside the United States or the applicable jurisdiction, acceptance of such study data by the FDA or applicable
foreign regulatory authority may be subject to certain conditions or exclusions. Where data from foreign clinical trials or clinical trial
sites are intended to serve as the basis for marketing approval in the United States, the FDA will not approve the application on the
basis of foreign data alone unless such data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; the studies were performed
by clinical investigators of recognized competence; and the data are considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the
FDA or, if the FDA considers such an inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or
other appropriate means. Many foreign regulatory bodies have similar requirements. In addition, such foreign studies would be subject
to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the studies are conducted. There can be no assurance the FDA or applicable
foreign regulatory authority will accept data from trials conducted outside of the United States or the applicable home country. If the
FDA or applicable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would likely result in the need for additional trials, which
would be costly and time-consuming and delay aspects of our business plan.
TARA-002 is an immunopotentiator, and one indication that we
plan to pursue is the treatment of LMs. There are no FDA-approved therapies for the treatment of LMs and it is difficult to predict the
timing and costs of clinical development for TARA-002 for LMs.
To date, there are no FDA-approved
therapies for the treatment of LMs. The regulatory approval process for novel product candidates such as TARA-002 can be more expensive
and take longer than for other, better known or extensively studied therapeutic approaches. Delay or failure to obtain, or unexpected
costs in obtaining, the regulatory approval necessary to bring TARA-002 to market in LMs could decrease our ability to generate sufficient
revenue to maintain our business.
Our product candidates may cause undesirable
side effects or have other unexpected properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, limit the commercial profile of
an approved label, or result in post-approval regulatory action.
Unforeseen side effects from
TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride could arise either during clinical development or, if approved, after the product has been marketed. Undesirable
side effects could cause us, any partners with which we may collaborate, or regulatory authorities to interrupt, extend, modify, delay
or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive or narrower label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the
FDA or comparable foreign authorities.
Results of clinical trials
could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of side effects. In such an event, trials could be suspended or terminated,
and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could order us to cease further development of or deny approval of a product
candidate for any or all targeted indications. Any side effects could affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to
complete the trial or result in product liability claims. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition, operating
results and prospects.
Additionally, if we or others
identify undesirable side effects, or other previously unknown problems, in connection with a product after obtaining U.S. or foreign
regulatory approval, a number of potentially negative consequences could result, which could prevent us or our potential partners from
achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the product and could substantially increase the costs of commercializing such product.
A fast track designation by the FDA may
not actually lead to a faster development or regulatory review or approval process for IV Choline Chloride for the treatment of IFALD.
The FDA has granted fast
track designation to IV Choline Chloride for the treatment of IFALD. If a drug is intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening
condition and the drug demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for this condition, the drug sponsor may apply for fast
track designation. Even though we have received fast track designation for IV Choline Chloride for the treatment of IFALD, we may not
experience a faster development process, review or approval. The FDA may withdraw fast track designation if it believes that the designation
is no longer supported by data from our clinical development program.
Although the FDA has granted Rare Pediatric
Disease Designation for TARA-002 for the treatment of LMs, a BLA for TARA-002, if approved, may not meet the eligibility criteria for
a priority review voucher.
Rare Pediatric Disease Designation
has been granted for TARA-002 for the treatment of LMs. In 2012, Congress authorized the FDA to award priority review vouchers to sponsors
of certain rare pediatric disease product applications. This provision is designed to encourage development of new drug and biological
products for prevention and treatment of certain rare pediatric diseases. Specifically, under this program, a sponsor who receives an
approval for a drug or biologic for a “rare pediatric disease” may qualify for a voucher that can be redeemed to receive a
priority review of a subsequent marketing application for a different product. The sponsor of a rare pediatric disease drug product receiving
a priority review voucher may transfer (including by sale) the voucher to another sponsor. The voucher may be further transferred any
number of times before the voucher is used, as long as the sponsor making the transfer has not yet submitted the application. The FDA
may also revoke any priority review voucher if the rare pediatric disease drug for which the voucher was awarded is not marketed in the
U.S. within one year following the date of approval.
For the purposes of this
program, a “rare pediatric disease” is a (a) serious or life-threatening disease in which the serious or life-threatening
manifestations primarily affect individuals aged from birth to 18 years, including age groups often called neonates, infants, children,
and adolescents; and (b) rare disease or conditions within the meaning of the Orphan Drug Act. Congress has only authorized the Rare Pediatric
Disease Priority Review Voucher program until September 30, 2024. However, if a drug candidate received Rare Pediatric Disease Designation
before September 30, 2024, it is eligible to receive a voucher if it is approved before September 30, 2026.
TARA-002 for the treatment
of LMs may not be approved by that date, or at all, and, therefore, we may not be in a position to obtain a priority review voucher prior
to expiration of the program, unless Congress further reauthorizes the program. Additionally, designation of a drug for a rare pediatric
disease does not guarantee that a BLA will meet the eligibility criteria for a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher at the time
the application is approved. Finally, a Rare Pediatric Disease Designation does not lead to faster development or regulatory review of
the product or increase the likelihood that it will receive marketing approval. We may or may not realize any benefit from receiving a
voucher.
Even if a product candidate
obtains regulatory approval, it may fail to achieve the broad degree of physician and patient adoption and use necessary for commercial
success.
The commercial success of
both TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride, if approved, will depend significantly on the broad adoption and use of them by physicians and
patients for approved indications, and neither may be commercially successful even though the product is shown to be safe and effective.
The degree and rate of physician and patient adoption of a product, if approved, and successful commercialization will depend on a number
of factors, including but not limited to:
| ● | patient
demand for approved products that treat the indication for which a product is approved; |
| ● | the
effectiveness of the product compared to other available therapies; |
| ● | the
availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement from managed care plans and other healthcare payors; |
| ● | the
cost of treatment in relation to alternative treatments and willingness to pay on the part of patients; |
| ● | in
the case of TARA-002 for LMs, overcoming physician or patient biases toward alternative treatments for LMs; |
| ● | insurers’
willingness to see the applicable indication as a disease worth treating; |
| ● | patient
satisfaction with the results, administration and overall treatment experience; |
| ● | the
ability to successfully commercialize TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride in the United States and internationally, if either is approved
for marketing, sale and distribution in such countries and territories, whether alone or in collaboration with others; |
| ● | our
ability and our partners’ ability to establish and enforce intellectual property rights in and to TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride; |
| ● | patient
demand for approved products that treat the indication for which a product is approved; |
| ● | limitations
or contraindications, warnings, precautions or approved indications for use different than those sought by us that are contained in the
final FDA-approved labeling for the applicable product; |
| ● | any
FDA requirement to undertake a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy; |
| ● | the
effectiveness of our sales, marketing, pricing, reimbursement and access, government affairs, and distribution efforts; |
| ● | adverse
publicity about a product or favorable publicity about competitive products; |
| ● | new
government regulations and programs, including price controls and/or limits or prohibitions on ways to commercialize drugs, such as increased
scrutiny on direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceuticals; and |
| ● | potential
product liability claims or other product-related litigation. |
If either TARA-002 or IV
Choline Chloride is approved for use but fails to achieve the broad degree of physician and patient adoption necessary for commercial
success, our operating results and financial condition will be adversely affected, which may delay, prevent or limit our ability to generate
revenue and continue our business.
Further, even if regulatory
approvals are obtained, we may never be able to successfully commercialize TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride, or the FDA or comparable foreign
regulatory authorities may require labeling changes or impose significant restrictions on a product’s indicated uses or marketing
or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly post-approval studies or post-market surveillance. Accordingly, we cannot assure
you that we will be able to generate sufficient revenue through the sale of TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride to continue our business.
Before obtaining marketing
approvals for the commercial sale of any product candidate, we must demonstrate through lengthy, complex and expensive preclinical testing
and clinical trials that such product candidate is both safe and effective for use in the applicable indication, and failures can occur
at any stage of testing. Clinical trials often fail to demonstrate safety and are associated with side effects or have characteristics
that are unexpected. Based on the safety profile seen in clinical testing, we may need to abandon development or limit development to
more narrow uses in which the side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more tolerable from a risk-benefit
perspective. The FDA or an institutional review board may also require that we suspend, discontinue, or limit clinical trials based on
safety information. Such findings could further result in regulatory authorities failing to provide marketing authorization for the product
candidate. Many pharmaceutical candidates that initially showed promise in early stage testing and which were efficacious have later been
found to cause side effects that prevented further development of the drug candidate and, in extreme cases, the side effects were not
seen until after the drug was marketed, causing regulators to remove the drug from the market post-approval.
Any adverse developments that occur in patients
undergoing treatment with OK-432 / Picibanil or in patients participating in clinical trials conducted by third parties may affect our
ability to obtain regulatory approval or commercialize TARA-002.
Chugai Pharmaceutical, over
which we have no control, has the rights to commercialize TARA-002 and the originator therapy to TARA-002, OK-432, which is currently
marketed under the name Picibanil, in Japan and Taiwan for various indications. In addition, clinical trials using Picibanil are currently
ongoing in various countries around the world. If serious adverse events occur with patients using Picibanil or during any clinical trials
of Picibanil conducted by third parties, the FDA may delay, limit or deny approval of TARA-002 or require us to conduct additional clinical
trials as a condition to marketing approval, which would increase our costs. If we receive FDA approval for TARA-002 and a new and serious
safety issue is identified in connection with use of Picibanil or in clinical trials of Picibanil conducted by third parties, the FDA
may withdraw the approval of the product or otherwise restrict our ability to market and sell TARA-002. In addition, treating physicians
may be less willing to administer TARA-002 due to concerns over such adverse events, which would limit our ability to commercialize TARA-002.
We may choose not to continue developing
or commercializing any of our product candidates at any time during development or after approval, which would reduce or eliminate the
potential return on investment for those product candidates.
At any time, we may decide
to discontinue the development of any of our product candidates for a variety of reasons, including the appearance of new technologies
that make our product candidates obsolete, competition from a competing product or changes in or failure to comply with applicable regulatory
requirements.
If we terminate a program
in which we have invested significant resources, we will not receive any return on our investment and we will have missed the opportunity
to have allocated those resources to potentially more productive uses.
Other Risks Related to Our Business
Our product candidates,
if approved, will face significant competition and their failure to compete effectively may prevent them from achieving significant market
penetration.
The pharmaceutical industry
is characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition, uncertain and complex patent terms, and a strong emphasis on
developing newer, fast-to-market proprietary therapeutics. Numerous companies are engaged in the development, patenting, manufacturing
and marketing of healthcare products competitive with those that we are developing, including TARA-002 and IV Choline Chloride. We will
face competition from a number of sources, such as pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, generic drug companies, consumer
products companies and academic and research institutions, many of which have greater financial resources, marketing capabilities, sales
forces, manufacturing capabilities, research and development capabilities, regulatory expertise, clinical trial expertise, intellectual
property portfolios, international reach, experience in obtaining patents and regulatory approvals for product candidates and other resources
than we have. Some of the companies that offer competing products also have a broad range of other product offerings, large direct sales
forces and long-term customer relationships with our target physicians, which could inhibit our market penetration efforts.
With respect to our lead
product candidate, TARA-002, for the treatment of NMIBC and LMs, the active ingredient in TARA-002 is a genetically distinct strain of
Streptococcus pyogenes (group A, type 3) Su strain. TARA-002 is produced through a proprietary manufacturing process. We anticipate
that, if approved by the FDA, TARA-002 will be protected by 12 years of biologic exclusivity. There are no approved pharmacotherapies
currently available for the treatment of LMs and the current treatment options include a high-risk surgical procedure and off-label use
of sclerosants, including doxycycline, bleomycin, ethanol and sodium tetradecyl sulfate. There are a number of drug development companies
and academic researchers exploring oral formulations of various agents including macrolides, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and calcineurin/mTOR
inhibitors. These are in early development. TARA-002, if approved for the treatment of NMIBC, would be subject to competition from existing
treatment methods of surgery, chemotherapy and immunomodulatory therapy. For example, the current standard of care for NMIBC includes
intravesical BCG TICE (manufactured by Merck & Co. Inc.). Other products approved for the treatment of NMIBC include Merck & Co.,
Inc.’s Keytruda, Endo International plc’s Valstar, and Ferring B.V.’s Adstiladrin. Additional product candidates in
development include Japanese BCG Laboratory’s BCG Tokyo, Pfizer Inc.’s Sasanlimab in combination with BCG, ImmunityBio, Inc.’s
VesAnktiva in combination with BCG, CG Oncology Inc.’s CG0070, Carisma Therapeutic Inc.’s Vicineum, enGene Inc.’s, EG-70,
Seagen Inc.’s PADCEV, Janssen’s TAR200 combined with gemcitabine plus or minus Cetrelimab, Urogen Pharma Ltd.’s Jelmyto,
and Auro BioSciences, Inc.’s Aura-0011. Additional pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies with product candidates in development
for the treatment of NMIBC include but may not be limited to Verity, AstraZeneca PLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Roche Group, Asieris
Pharmaceuticals, BeiGene, Ltd, NanOlogy, LLC, Linton Pharm Co., Ltd., Lindis Biotech GmbH, Theralase Technologies Inc., Taizhou Hanzhong
biomedical co. Ltd., Shionogi & Co. Ltd., Rapamycin Holdings, Inc., Vaxiion Therapeutics Inc., Incyte Corporation, LiPac Oncology,
Inc., Anika Therapeutics Inc., Surge Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., and Istari Oncology, Inc..
There are no treatments currently
available for IFALD. With respect to IV Choline Chloride for the treatment of IFALD, IV Choline Chloride is the only sterile injectable
form of choline chloride that can be combined with parenteral nutrition. Further, if approved, IV Choline Chloride will be protected by
Orphan Drug Designation exclusivity for seven years.
TARA-002 and any future product candidates
for which we intend to seek approval as biologic products may face competition sooner than anticipated.
The Biologics Price Competition
and Innovation Act of 2009, or BPCIA, created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products that are biosimilar to or interchangeable
with an FDA-licensed reference biological product. Under the BPCIA, an application for a biosimilar product may not be submitted to the
FDA until four years following the date that the reference product was first licensed by the FDA. In addition, the approval of a biosimilar
product may not be made effective by the FDA until 12 years from the date on which the reference product was first licensed. During this
12-year period of exclusivity, another company may still market a competing version of the reference product if the FDA approves a full
BLA for the competing product containing the sponsor’s own preclinical data and data from adequate and well-controlled clinical
trials to demonstrate the safety, purity and potency of their product. The law is complex and is still being interpreted and implemented
by the FDA. As a result, its ultimate impact, implementation and meaning are subject to uncertainty. While it is uncertain when such processes
are intended to be implemented, the BPCIA may be fully adopted by the FDA, and any such processes could have a material adverse effect
on the future commercial prospects for our biological products.
We believe that any of our
product candidates approved as a biological product under a BLA should qualify for the 12-year period of exclusivity. However, there is
a risk that this exclusivity could be shortened due to congressional action or otherwise, or that the FDA will not consider our product
candidates to be reference products for competing products, potentially creating the opportunity for biosimilar competition sooner than
anticipated. Other aspects of the BPCIA, some of which may impact the BPCIA exclusivity provisions, have also been the subject of recent
litigation. Moreover, the extent to which a biosimilar, once approved, will be substituted for any one of our reference products in a
way that is similar to traditional generic substitution for non-biological products is not yet clear, and will depend on a number of marketplace
and regulatory factors that are still developing.
We currently have limited marketing capabilities
and no sales organization. If we are unable to grow our sales and marketing capabilities on our own or through third parties, we will
be unable to successfully commercialize our product candidates, if approved, or generate product revenue.
We currently have limited
marketing capabilities and no sales organization. To commercialize our product candidates, if approved, in the United States, Canada,
the European Union, Latin America and other jurisdictions we may seek to enter, we must build our marketing, sales, distribution, managerial
and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services, and we may not be successful in
doing so. Although our employees have experience in the marketing, sale and distribution of pharmaceutical products, and business development
activities involving external alliances, from prior employment at other companies, we, as a company, have no prior experience in the marketing,
sale and distribution of pharmaceutical products, and there are significant risks involved in building and managing a sales organization,
including our ability to hire, retain and incentivize qualified individuals, generate sufficient sales leads, provide adequate training
to sales and marketing personnel, and effectively manage a geographically dispersed sales and marketing team. Any failure or delay in
the development of our internal sales, marketing, distribution and pricing/reimbursement/access capabilities would impact adversely the
commercialization of these products.
We have only received the exclusive rights
to the materials required to commercialize TARA-002 in territories other than Japan and Taiwan until June 17, 2030, or an earlier date
if Chugai Pharmaceutical terminates the agreement with us for any number of reasons, following which such rights become non-exclusive.
Pursuant to an agreement
with Chugai Pharmaceutical dated June 17, 2019, as amended on July 14, 2020 (effective as of June 30, 2020), Chugai Pharmaceutical agreed
to provide us with exclusive access to the starting material necessary to manufacture TARA-002 as well as technical support necessary
for us to develop and commercialize TARA-002 anywhere in the world other than Japan and Taiwan. However, this agreement does not prevent
Chugai from providing such materials and support to any third-party for medical, compassionate use and/or non-commercial research purposes
and this agreement is exclusive only through June 17, 2030 or, the earlier termination of the agreement by either party. Once our rights
to the materials and technology necessary to manufacture, develop and commercialize TARA-002 are not exclusive, third parties, including
those with greater expertise and greater resources, could obtain such materials and technology and develop a competing therapy, which
would adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and achieve or maintain profitability.
Even if we obtain regulatory approval to
begin commercializing any of our products, we would remain subject to ongoing regulatory review, which could subsequently result in a
suspension or termination of sale of these products.
Even after we achieve U.S.
regulatory approval for a product candidate, if any, we will be subject to continued regulatory review and compliance obligations. For
example, with respect to our product candidates, the FDA may impose significant restrictions on the approved indicated uses for which
the product may be marketed or on the conditions of approval. A product candidate’s approval may contain requirements for potentially
costly post-approval studies and surveillance, including Phase 4 clinical trials, to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product. We
will also be subject to ongoing FDA obligations and continued regulatory review with respect to, among other things, the manufacturing,
processing, labeling, packaging, distribution, pharmacovigilance and adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion and recordkeeping
for our product candidates. In addition, manufacturers of drug and biologic products and their facilities are subject to continual review
and periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with cGMP regulations. If we or a regulatory agency
discovers previously unknown problems with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with
the manufacturing, processing, distribution or storage facility where, or processes by which, the product is made, a regulatory agency
may impose restrictions on that product or us, including requesting that we initiate a product recall, or requiring notice to physicians
or the public, withdrawal of the product from the market, or suspension of manufacturing.
We face product liability exposure, and
if successful claims are brought against us, we may incur substantial liability if our insurance coverage for those claims is inadequate.
We face an inherent risk
of product liability or similar causes of action as a result of the clinical testing of our product candidates and will face an even greater
risk if we commercialize any products. This risk exists even if a product is approved for commercial sale by the FDA and manufactured
in facilities licensed and regulated by the FDA or an applicable foreign regulatory authority and notwithstanding that we comply with
applicable laws on promotional activity. Our products and product candidates are designed to affect important bodily functions and processes.
Any side effects, manufacturing defects, misuse or abuse associated with our product candidates could result in injury to a patient or
potentially even death. We cannot offer any assurance that we will not face product liability suits in the future, nor can we assure you
that our insurance coverage will be sufficient to cover our liability under any such cases.
In addition, a liability
claim may be brought against us even if our product candidates merely appear to have caused an injury. Product liability claims may be
brought against us by consumers, healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies or others selling or otherwise coming into contact with
our product candidates, among others, and under some circumstances even government agencies. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves
against product liability or similar claims, we will incur substantial liabilities, reputational harm and possibly injunctions and punitive
actions. In addition, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:
| ● | withdrawal
or delay of recruitment or decreased enrollment rates of clinical trial participants; |
| ● | termination
or increased government regulation of clinical trial sites or entire trial programs; |
| ● | the
inability to commercialize our product candidates; |
| ● | decreased
demand for our product candidates; |
| ● | impairment
of our business reputation; |
| ● | product
recall or withdrawal from the market or labeling, marketing or promotional restrictions; |
| ● | substantial
costs of any related litigation or similar disputes; |
|
● |
distraction of management’s attention and other resources from our primary business; |
|
● |
significant delay in product launch; |
|
● |
substantial monetary awards to patients or other claimants against us that may not be covered by insurance; |
|
● |
withdrawal of reimbursement or formulary inclusion; or |
We have obtained product
liability insurance coverage for our clinical trials. Large judgments have been awarded in class action or individual lawsuits based on
drugs that had unanticipated side effects. Our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover all of our product liability-related
expenses or losses and may not cover us for any expenses or losses we may suffer. Moreover, insurance coverage is becoming increasingly
expensive, restrictive and narrow, and, in the future, we may not be able to maintain adequate insurance coverage at a reasonable cost,
in sufficient amounts or upon adequate terms to protect us against losses due to product liability or other similar legal actions. We
will need to increase our product liability coverage if any of our product candidates receive regulatory approval, which will be costly,
and we may be unable to obtain this increased product liability insurance on commercially reasonable terms or at all and for all geographies
in which we wish to launch. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against us, if judgments exceed our insurance
coverage, could decrease our cash and harm our business, financial condition, operating results and future prospects.
Our employees, independent contractors,
principal investigators, other clinical trial staff, consultants, vendors, CROs and any partners with whom we may collaborate may engage
in misconduct or other improper activities, including non-compliance with regulatory standards and requirements.
We are exposed to the risk
that our employees, independent contractors, principal investigators, other clinical trial staff, consultants, vendors, CROs and any partners
with which we may collaborate may engage in fraudulent or other illegal activity. Misconduct by these persons could include intentional,
reckless, gross or negligent misconduct or unauthorized activity that violates: laws or regulations, including those laws requiring the
reporting of true, complete and accurate information to the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities; manufacturing standards; federal, state
and foreign healthcare fraud and abuse laws and data privacy; anticorruption laws, anti-kickback and Medicare/Medicaid rules, or laws
that require the true, complete and accurate reporting of financial information or data, books and records. If any such or similar actions
are instituted against us and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant
impact on our business, including the imposition of significant civil, criminal and administrative and punitive penalties, damages, monetary
fines, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, debarments, contractual damages,
imprisonment, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, injunctions, and curtailment or cessation of our operations,
any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our operating results.
We may
be subject to risks related to off-label use of our product candidates, if approved.
The FDA strictly regulates
the advertising and promotion of drug products, and drug products may only be marketed or promoted for their FDA approved uses, consistent
with the product’s approved labeling. Advertising and promotion of any product candidate that obtains approval in the United States
will be heavily scrutinized by the FDA, the Department of Justice, the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human
Services, state attorneys general, members of Congress and the public. For example, the FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws
and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may
be subject to significant liability. Although physicians may prescribe products for off-label uses as the FDA and other regulatory agencies
do not regulate a physician’s choice of drug treatment made in the physician’s independent medical judgment, they do restrict
promotional communications from companies or their sales force with respect to off-label uses of products for which marketing clearance
has not been issued. Companies may only share truthful and not misleading information that is otherwise consistent with a product’s
FDA approved labeling. Violations, including promotion of our products for unapproved or off-label uses, are subject to enforcement letters,
inquiries and investigations, and civil, criminal and/or administrative sanctions by the FDA. Additionally, advertising and promotion
of any product candidate that obtains approval outside of the United States will be heavily scrutinized by relevant foreign regulatory
authorities.
In the United States, engaging
in impermissible promotion of our product candidates for off-label uses can also subject us to false claims litigation under federal and
state statutes, which can lead to significant civil, criminal and/or administrative penalties and fines and agreements, such as a corporate
integrity agreement, that materially restrict the manner in which we promote or distribute our product candidates. If we do not lawfully
promote our products once they have received regulatory approval, we may become subject to such litigation and, if we are not successful
in defending against such actions, those actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating
results and even result in having an independent compliance monitor assigned to audit our ongoing operations for a lengthy period of time.
If we or any partners with which we may
collaborate are unable to achieve and maintain coverage and adequate levels of reimbursement for TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride following
regulatory approval, their commercial success may be hindered severely.
If TARA-002 or IV Choline
Chloride only becomes available by prescription, successful sales by us or by any partners with which we may collaborate depend on the
availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party payors. Patients who are prescribed medicine for the treatment of
their conditions generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse most or part of the costs associated with their prescription drugs.
The availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement from governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid in the United
States, and private third-party payors is often critical to new product acceptance. Coverage decisions may depend on clinical and economic
standards that disfavor new drug products when more established or lower-cost therapeutic alternatives are already available or subsequently
become available, or may be affected by the budgets and demands on the various entities responsible for providing health insurance to
patients who will use TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride. Even if we obtain coverage for our products, the resulting reimbursement payment
rates might not be adequate or may require co-payments that patients find unacceptably high. Patients are unlikely to use a product unless
coverage is provided, and reimbursement is adequate to cover a significant portion of the cost.
In addition, the market for
our products will depend significantly on access to third-party payors’ drug formularies or lists of medications for which third-party
payors provide coverage and reimbursement. The industry competition to be included in such formularies often leads to downward pricing
pressures on pharmaceutical companies and there may be time limitations on when a new drug may even apply for formulary inclusion. Also,
third-party payors may refuse to include products in their formularies or otherwise restrict patient access to such products when a less
costly biosimilar or generic equivalent or other treatment alternative is available in the discretion of the formulary.
Third-party payors, whether
foreign or domestic, or governmental or commercial, are developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs.
In addition, in the United States, although private third-party payors tend to follow Medicare practices, no uniform or consistent policy
of coverage and reimbursement for drug products exists among third-party payors. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for drug products
can differ significantly from payor to payor as well as from state to state. Consequently, the coverage determination process is often
a time-consuming and costly process that must be played out across many jurisdictions and different entities and that will require us
to provide scientific, clinical and health economics support for the use of our products compared to current alternatives and do so to
each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be obtained and in what time frame.
Further, we believe that
future coverage and reimbursement likely will be subject to increased restrictions both in the United States and in international markets.
Third-party coverage and reimbursement for our products may not be available or adequate in either the United States or international
markets, which could harm our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects. Further, coverage policies and third-party
reimbursement rates may change at any time. Therefore, even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained, less favorable
coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.
Healthcare
reform measures could hinder or prevent the commercial success of our product candidates.
Existing regulatory policies
may change, and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of any future
product candidates we may develop. For example, the Trump administration and certain members of the U.S. Congress sought to repeal all
or part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively,
the Affordable Care Act, and implement a replacement program. In another example, the so-called “individual mandate” was repealed
as part of tax reform legislation adopted in December 2017, informally titled the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or Tax Act, such that the shared
responsibility payment for individuals who fail to maintain minimum essential coverage under section 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code
was eliminated beginning in 2019. Additionally, on June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that
argued the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional in its entirety because the individual mandate was repealed by Congress. Thus, the
Affordable Care Act will remain in effect in its current form. Further, prior to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, on January 28, 2021, President
Biden issued an executive order that initiated a special enrollment period for purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through
the Affordable Care Act marketplace. The executive order also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their
existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver
programs that include work requirements, and policies that create barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid
or the Affordable Care Act. It is possible that the Affordable Care Act will be subject to judicial or Congressional challenges in the
future. It is unclear how such challenges and the healthcare reform measures of the Biden administration will impact the Affordable Care
Act and our business.
Additionally, there has
been increasing legislative and enforcement interest in the United States with respect to drug pricing practices. For example, the Trump
administration used several means to propose or implement drug pricing reform, including through federal budget proposals, executive
orders and policy initiatives. On July 24, 2020 and September 13, 2020, the Trump administration announced several executive orders related
to prescription drug pricing that attempted to implement several of the administration’s proposals. The FDA also released a final
rule and guidance implementing a portion of the importation executive order providing pathways for states to build and submit importation
plans for drugs from Canada. Further, on November 20, 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, finalized a regulation
removing safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either directly
or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is required by law. The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price
reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a new safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers
and manufacturers. The implementation of the rule has been delayed until January 1, 2026. On November 20, 2020, the Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services, or CMS, issued an interim final rule implementing former President Trump’s Most Favored Nation, or MFN,
executive order, which would tie Medicare Part B payments for certain physician-administered drugs to the lowest price paid in other
economically advanced countries, and was effective as of January 1, 2021. As a result of litigation challenging the MFN model, on December
27, 2021, CMS published a final rule that rescinded the MFN model interim final rule. Further, in July 2021, the Biden administration
released an executive order that included multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive order,
on September 9, 2021, HHS released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform.
The plan sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue as well as potential administrative actions
HHS could take to advance these principles. No legislation or administrative actions have been finalized to implement these principles.
In addition, on August 16, 2022, President Biden signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which, among other things, contains
substantial drug pricing reforms that will reduce drug spending by the federal government. For example, the Inflation Reduction Act of
2022 limits the prices paid by Medicare for various prescription drugs and requires drug manufacturers to pay rebates to Medicare if
they increase prices faster than inflation for drugs used by Medicare beneficiaries. Although the effect of the Inflation Reduction Act
of 2022 on our business and the pharmaceutical industry in general is not yet known, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 could affect
the prices we can charge and the reimbursement we can receive for our product candidates, if approved, thereby reducing our profitability.
We also expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the
amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in reduced demand for our
product candidates if approved or additional pricing pressures.
There are also calls to place
additional restrictions on or to ban direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceuticals, which would limit our ability to market our product
candidates. The United States is in a minority of jurisdictions that allow this kind of advertising and its removal could limit the potential
reach of a marketing campaign.
We are subject to strict
healthcare laws, regulation and enforcement, and our failure to comply with those laws could adversely affect our business, operations
and financial condition.
Certain federal and state
healthcare laws and regulations pertaining to fraud and abuse, privacy, transparency, and patients’ rights are and will be applicable
to our business. We are subject to regulation by both the federal government and the states in which we or our partners conduct business.
The healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate include but are not limited to: the federal Anti-Kickback Statute;
federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws; the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act; the Prescription Drug Marketing Act
(for sampling of drug product among other things); the federal physician sunshine requirements under the Affordable Care Act; the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act as it applies to activities outside of the United States; the federal Right-to-Try legislation; and similar state
laws of such federal laws, which may be broader in scope.
Because of the breadth of
these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business activities
could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. In addition, recent healthcare reform legislation has strengthened these
laws. For example, the Affordable Care Act, among other things, amended the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and
certain criminal healthcare fraud statutes. A person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent
to violate it. In addition, the Affordable Care Act provided that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting
from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False
Claims Act.
Achieving and sustaining
compliance with these laws may prove costly. In addition, any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend
against it, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert management’s attention from the operation of our business
and result in reputational damage. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental
laws or regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to significant penalties, including administrative, civil and criminal penalties,
damages, including punitive damages, fines, disgorgement, the exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, imprisonment,
additional oversight and reporting obligations, or the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, and injunctions, any of which could
adversely affect our ability to operate our business and financial results.
We may in-license and acquire product candidates
and may engage in other strategic transactions, which could impact our liquidity, increase our expenses and present significant distractions
to our management.
Part of our strategy is to
in-license and acquire product candidates and we may engage in other strategic transactions. Additional potential transactions that we
may consider include a variety of different business arrangements, including spin-offs, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, restructurings,
divestitures, business combinations and investments. Any such transaction may require us to incur non-recurring or other charges, may
increase our near- and long-term expenditures and may pose significant integration challenges or disrupt our management or business, which
could adversely affect our operations and financial results. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will undertake or successfully
complete any transactions of the nature described above, and any transaction that we do complete could harm our business, financial condition,
operating results and prospects.
Our failure to successfully in-license,
acquire, develop and market additional product candidates or approved products would impair our ability to grow our business.
We may in-license, acquire,
develop and market additional products and product candidates. Because our internal research and development capabilities are limited,
we may be dependent on pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic or government scientists and other researchers to sell or
license products or technology to us. The success of this strategy depends partly on our ability to identify and select promising pharmaceutical
and biologic product candidates and products, negotiate licensing or acquisition agreements with their current owners, and finance these
arrangements.
The process of proposing,
negotiating and implementing a license or acquisition of a product candidate or approved product is lengthy and complex. Other companies,
including some with substantially greater financial, marketing, sales and other resources, may compete with us for the license or acquisition
of product candidates and approved products. We have limited resources to identify and execute the acquisition or in-licensing of third-party
products, businesses and technologies and integrate them into our current infrastructure. Moreover, we may devote resources to potential
acquisitions or licensing opportunities that are never completed, or we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such efforts.
We may not be able to acquire the rights to additional product candidates on terms that we find acceptable or at all.
Further, any product candidate
that we acquire may require additional development efforts prior to commercial sale, including preclinical or clinical testing and approval
by the FDA and applicable foreign regulatory authorities. All product candidates are prone to risks of failure typical of pharmaceutical
product development, including the possibility that a product candidate will not be shown to be sufficiently safe and effective for approval
by regulatory authorities. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that any approved products that we acquire will be manufactured or
sold profitably or achieve market acceptance.
We expect to rely on collaborations with
third parties for the successful development and commercialization of our product candidates.
We expect to rely upon the
efforts of third parties for the successful development and commercialization of our current and future product candidates. The clinical
and commercial success of our product candidates may depend upon maintaining successful relationships with third-party partners which
are subject to a number of significant risks, including the following:
| ● | our
partners’ ability to execute their responsibilities in a timely, cost-efficient and compliant manner; |
| ● | reduced
control over delivery and manufacturing schedules; |
| ● | price
increases and product reliability; |
| ● | manufacturing
deviations from internal or regulatory specifications; |
| ● | the
failure of partners to perform their obligations for technical, market or other reasons; |
|
● |
misappropriation of our current or future product candidates; and |
|
● |
other risks in potentially meeting our current and future anticipated commercialization schedule for product candidates or satisfying the requirements of our end-users. |
We cannot assure you that
we will be able to establish or maintain third-party relationships in order to successfully develop and commercialize our product candidates.
We rely completely on third-party contractors
to supply, manufacture and distribute clinical drug supplies for our product candidates, which may include sole-source suppliers and manufacturers;
we intend to rely on third parties for commercial supply, manufacturing and distribution if any of our product candidates receive regulatory
approval; and we expect to rely on third parties for supply, manufacturing and distribution of preclinical, clinical and commercial supplies
of any future product candidates.
We do not currently have,
nor do we plan to acquire, the infrastructure or capability to supply, store, manufacture or distribute preclinical, clinical or commercial
quantities of drug substances or products. Additionally, we have not entered into a long-term commercial supply agreement to provide us
with such drug substances or products. As a result, our ability to develop our product candidates is dependent, and our ability to supply
our products commercially will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain active pharmaceutical ingredient, or API, and other substances
and materials used in our product candidates successfully from third parties and to have finished products manufactured by third parties
in accordance with regulatory requirements and in sufficient quantities for preclinical and clinical testing and commercialization. If
we fail to develop and maintain supply and other technical relationships with these third parties, we may be unable to continue to develop
or commercialize our products and product candidates.
We do not have direct control
over whether our contract suppliers and manufacturers will maintain current pricing terms, be willing to continue supplying us with API
and finished products or maintain adequate capacity and capabilities to serve our needs, including quality control, quality assurance
and qualified personnel. We are dependent on our contract suppliers and manufacturers for day-to-day compliance with applicable laws and
cGMP for production of both API and finished products. If the safety or quality of any product or product candidate or component is compromised
due to a failure to adhere to applicable laws or for other reasons, we may not be able to commercialize or obtain regulatory approval
for the affected product or product candidate successfully, and we may be held liable for injuries sustained as a result.
In order to conduct larger
or late-stage clinical trials for our product candidates and supply sufficient commercial quantities of any of our products, if approved,
our contract manufacturers and suppliers will need to produce our API and other substances and materials used in our product candidates
in larger quantities, more cost-effectively and, in certain cases, at higher yields than they currently achieve. If our third-party contractors
are unable to scale up the manufacture of any of our product candidates successfully in sufficient quality and quantity and at commercially
reasonable prices, or are shut down or put on clinical hold by government regulators, and we are unable to find one or more replacement
suppliers or manufacturers capable of production at a substantially equivalent cost in substantially equivalent volumes and quality, and
we are unable to transfer the processes successfully on a timely basis, the development of that product candidate and regulatory approval
or commercial launch for any resulting products may be delayed, or there may be a shortage in supply, either of which could significantly
harm our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.
We expect to continue to
depend on third-party contract suppliers and manufacturers for the foreseeable future. Our supply and manufacturing agreements, if any,
do not guarantee that a contract supplier or manufacturer will provide services adequate for our needs. Additionally, any damage to or
destruction of our third-party manufacturers’ or suppliers’ facilities or equipment, even by force majeure, may significantly
impair our ability to have our products and product candidates manufactured on a timely basis. Our reliance on contract manufacturers
and suppliers further exposes us to the possibility that they, or third parties with access to their facilities, will have access to and
may misappropriate our trade secrets or other proprietary information. In addition, the manufacturing facilities of certain of our suppliers
may be located outside of the United States. This may give rise to difficulties in importing our products or product candidates or their
components into the United States or other countries.
The manufacture of biologics is complex
and our third-party manufacturers may encounter difficulties in production. If our CDMO encounters such difficulties, the ability to provide
supply of TARA-002 for clinical trials, our ability to obtain marketing approval, or our ability to obtain commercial supply of TARA-002,
if approved, could be delayed or stopped.
We have no experience in
biologic manufacturing and do not own or operate, and we do not expect to own or operate, facilities for product manufacturing, storage
and distribution, or testing. We are completely dependent on CDMOs to fulfill our clinical and commercial supply of TARA-002. The process
of manufacturing biologics is complex, highly regulated and subject to multiple risks. Manufacturing biologics is highly susceptible to
product loss due to contamination, equipment failure, improper installation or operation of equipment, vendor or operator error, inconsistency
in yields, variability in product characteristics and difficulties in scaling the production process. Even minor deviations from normal
manufacturing processes could result in reduced production yields, product defects and other supply disruptions and higher costs. If microbial,
viral or other contaminations are discovered at the facilities of our manufacturer, such facilities may need to be closed for an extended
period of time to investigate and remedy the contamination, which could delay clinical trials, result in higher costs of drug product
and adversely harm our business. Moreover, if the FDA determines that our manufacturer is not in compliance with FDA laws and regulations,
including those governing cGMP, the FDA may deny BLA approval until the deficiencies are corrected or we replace the manufacturer in our
BLA with a manufacturer that is in compliance.
In addition, there are risks
associated with large scale manufacturing for clinical trials or commercial scale including, among others, cost overruns, potential problems
with process scale-up, process reproducibility, stability issues, compliance with cGMP, lot consistency and timely availability of raw
materials. Even if we obtain regulatory approval for TARA-002 or any future product candidates, there is no assurance that our manufacturers
will be able to manufacture the approved product to specifications acceptable to the FDA or other regulatory authorities, to produce it
in sufficient quantities to meet the requirements for the potential launch of the product or to meet potential future demand. If our manufacturers
are unable to produce sufficient quantities for clinical trials or for commercialization, commercialization efforts would be impaired,
which would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. Scaling up a biologic
manufacturing process is a difficult and uncertain task, and any CDMO we contract may not have the necessary capabilities to complete
the implementation and development process of further scaling up production, transferring production to other sites, or managing its production
capacity to timely meet product demand.
If we fail to attract and retain management
and other key personnel, we may be unable to continue to successfully develop or commercialize our product candidates or otherwise implement
our business plan.
Our ability to compete in
the highly competitive biopharmaceuticals industry depends on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified managerial, scientific,
medical, legal, sales and marketing and other personnel. We are highly dependent on our management and scientific personnel. The loss
of the services of any of these individuals could impede, delay or prevent the successful development of our product pipeline, completion
of our planned clinical trials, commercialization of our product candidates or in-licensing or acquisition of new assets and could impact
negatively our ability to implement successfully our business plan. If we lose the services of any of these individuals, we might not
be able to find suitable replacements on a timely basis or at all, and our business could be harmed as a result. We might not be able
to attract or retain qualified management and other key personnel in the future due to the intense competition for qualified personnel
among biotechnology, pharmaceutical and other businesses.
In addition, over the past
few years the United States has experienced a decrease in unemployment rates and an increasingly competitive labor market, which may
continue to result in difficulties in hiring or retaining sufficient qualified personnel to maintain and grow our business. We are uncertain
as to the employment environment in the future, or how that environment will impact our workforce, including our ability to retain qualified
management and other key personnel.
We may be adversely affected by natural
disasters, pandemics and other catastrophic events and by man-made problems such as terrorism and war that could disrupt our business
operations, and our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster.
Our office is located in
New York, New York. If a disaster, power outage, computer hacking, or other event occurred that prevented us from using all or a significant
portion of an office, that damaged critical infrastructure, such as enterprise financial systems, IT systems, manufacturing resource planning
or enterprise quality systems, or that otherwise disrupted operations, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible for us to
continue our business for a substantial period of time. For example, we are expanding our clinical development of TARA-002 in NMBIC to
clinical trial sites outside the United States, including potentially in Ukraine and in other countries in Europe and Asia and may expand
to other geographies. If political or civil conditions require it, our sites may need to delay or suspend clinical trial activities. In
addition, enrollment and retention of patients at such sites could be disrupted by geopolitical events, including civil or political unrest,
such as the current ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. All of the aforementioned risks may be further increased if we do not
implement a disaster recovery plan or our partners’ or manufacturers’ disaster recovery plans prove to be inadequate. To the
extent that any of the above should result in delays in the research, development, regulatory approval, manufacture, distribution or commercialization
of TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride, our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects would suffer.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
We expect our stock price to
be highly volatile.
The market price of our shares
could be subject to significant fluctuations. Market prices for securities of biotechnology and other life sciences companies historically
have been particularly volatile, even subject to large daily price swings. For example, the closing price of our common stock from the
period January 1, 2023 to May 1, 2023 has ranged from a low of $2.76 to a high of $3.91. Some of the factors that may cause the
market price of our shares to fluctuate include, but are not limited to:
| ● | the
results of current and any future clinical trials of TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride and any clinical trial failure, including any failure
resulting from difficulties or delays in identifying patients, enrolling patients, retaining patients, meeting specific trial endpoints
or completing and timely reporting the results of any trial; |
| ● | our
ability to obtain regulatory approvals for TARA-002, IV Choline Chloride or future product candidates, and delays of, or failures to
obtain such approvals; |
| ● | the
failure of TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride or future product candidates, if approved, to achieve commercial success; |
| ● | potential
side effects associated with TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride or future product candidates; |
| ● | issues
in manufacturing, or the inability to obtain adequate supply of, TARA-002, IV Choline Chloride or future product candidates; |
| ● | the
entry into, or termination of, or breach by partners of key agreements, including key commercial partner agreements; |
| ● | the
initiation of, material developments in, or conclusion of, any litigation or other actions to enforce or defend any intellectual property
rights or defend against the intellectual property rights of others; |
| ● | announcements
of any dilutive equity financings; |
| ● | inability
to obtain additional funding; |
| ● | announcements
by commercial partners or competitors of new commercial products, clinical progress or the lack thereof, significant contracts, commercial
relationships or capital commitments; |
| ● | failure
to elicit meaningful stock analyst coverage and downgrades of our stock by analysts; |
| ● | the
loss of key employees; |
| ● | changes
in laws or regulations application to TARA-002 or IV Choline Chloride or future product candidates; and |
| ● | sales
of our common stock by us, our insiders or our other stockholders. |
Moreover, the stock markets
in general have experienced substantial volatility in our industry that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of individual
companies or a certain industry segment. These broad market fluctuations may also adversely affect the trading price of our shares.
In the past, following periods
of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, stockholders have often instituted class action securities litigation
against those companies. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management attention and resources,
which could significantly harm our profitability and reputation. In addition, such securities litigation often has ensued after a reverse
merger or other merger and acquisition activity. Such litigation if brought could impact negatively our business.
We incur costs and demands upon management
as a result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting public companies.
As a public company, we have
incurred, and will continue to incur, significant legal, accounting and other expenses, including costs associated with public company
reporting and other SEC requirements. We have also incurred, and will continue to incur, costs associated with corporate governance requirements,
including requirements under the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other applicable legislation, as well as rules implemented by
the SEC and Nasdaq.
We expect the rules and regulations
applicable to public companies will continue to substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities
more time-consuming and costly. Our executive officers and other personnel will need to continue to devote substantial time to managing
operations as a public company and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. These rules and regulations may also make it expensive
for us to operate our business.
If we fail to maintain proper and effective
internal controls, our ability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis could be impaired.
We are subject to the reporting
requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and regulations of Nasdaq. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among
other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. We must perform
system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness
of our internal controls over financial reporting in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filing for that year, as required by Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This will require that we incur substantial professional fees and internal costs to expand our accounting and
finance functions and that we expend significant management efforts. We may experience difficulty in meeting these reporting requirements
in a timely manner.
We may discover weaknesses
in our system of internal financial and accounting controls and procedures that could result in a material misstatement of our financial
statements. Our internal control over financial reporting will not prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be
met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements
due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected.
If we are not able to comply
with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or if we are unable to maintain proper and effective internal controls,
we may not be able to produce timely and accurate financial statements. If that were to happen, the market price of our common stock could
decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities or by Nasdaq.
We are able to take advantage of reduced
disclosure and governance requirements applicable to smaller reporting companies, which could result in our common stock being less attractive
to investors.
We qualify as a smaller reporting
company under the rules of the SEC. As a smaller reporting company, we are able to take advantage of reduced disclosure requirements,
such as certain simplified executive compensation disclosures and reduced financial statement disclosure requirements in our SEC filings.
Comparatively reduced disclosures in our SEC filings due to our status as a smaller reporting company may make it harder for our investors
to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive
due to our reliance on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active
trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile. We may take advantage of the reporting exemptions applicable
to a smaller reporting company until we are no longer a smaller reporting company, which status would end once we have a public float
greater than $250 million. In that event, we could still be a smaller reporting company if our annual revenues were below $100 million
and we have a public float of less than $700 million.
We do not anticipate paying
any dividends in the foreseeable future.
The current expectation is
that we will retain our future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, capital appreciation, if any,
of your shares of our stock will be your sole source of gain, if any, for the foreseeable future.
If equity research analysts do not publish
research or reports, or publish unfavorable research or reports, about us, our business or our market, our stock price and trading volume
could decline.
The trading market for
our common stock is influenced by the research and reports that equity research analysts publish about us and our business. Equity research
analysts may elect not to provide research coverage of our common stock, and such lack of research coverage may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock. In the event we do have equity research analyst coverage, we will not have any control over the analysts
or the content and opinions included in their reports. The price of our common stock could decline if one or more equity research analysts
downgrade our stock or issue other unfavorable commentary or research. If one or more equity research analysts ceases coverage of us
or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our common stock could decrease, which in turn could cause our stock price or
trading volume to decline.
Risk Related to Our Ownership Structure
and Governance
Certain stockholders have the ability to
control or significantly influence certain matters submitted to our stockholders for approval.
Certain stockholders have
consent rights over certain significant matters of our business. These include decisions to effect a merger or other similar transaction,
changes to our principal business, and the sale or other transfer of TARA-002 or other assets with an aggregate value of more than $2,500,000.
As a result, these stockholders have significant influence over certain matters that require approval by our stockholders.
Anti-takeover provisions in our charter
documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of our business more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders
to replace or remove management.
Provisions in our certificate
of incorporation and bylaws may delay or prevent an acquisition or a change in management. In addition, because we are incorporated in
Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, which prohibits stockholders
owning in excess of 15% of the outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us. These provisions may frustrate or prevent any
attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove then current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members
of the board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of management.
Our certificate of incorporation provides
that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for certain disputes between us and our stockholders, which
could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other
employees.
Our certificate of incorporation
provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the sole and exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought
on our behalf, any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to us or our
stockholders, any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provisions of the DGCL, our certificate of incorporation
or our bylaws, or any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. The choice of forum provision
may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for certain disputes with us or our
directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees.
If a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in the certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable
in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property Rights
We may not be able to obtain, maintain or
enforce global patent rights or other intellectual property rights that cover our product candidates and technologies that are of sufficient
breadth to prevent third parties from competing against us.
Our success with respect
to our product candidates will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in both the United States and
other countries, to preserve our trade secrets and to prevent third parties from infringing on our proprietary rights. Our ability to
protect our product candidates from unauthorized or infringing use by third parties depends in substantial part on our ability to obtain
and maintain valid and enforceable patents around the world.
The patent application process,
also known as patent prosecution, is expensive and time-consuming, and we and our current or future licensors and licensees may not be
able to prepare, file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner in all the
countries that are desirable. It is also possible that we or our current licensors, or any future licensors or licensees, will fail to
identify patentable aspects of inventions made in the course of development and commercialization activities before it is too late to
obtain patent protection on them. Therefore, these and any of our patents and applications may not be prosecuted and enforced in a manner
consistent with the best interests of our business. Moreover, our competitors independently may develop equivalent knowledge, methods
and know-how or discover workarounds to our patents that would not constitute infringement. Any of these outcomes could impair our ability
to enforce the exclusivity of our patents effectively, which may have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and operating
results.
Due to legal standards relating
to patentability, validity, enforceability and claim scope of patents covering pharmaceutical inventions, our ability to obtain, maintain
and enforce patents is uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions especially across countries. Accordingly, rights under
any existing patents or any patents we might obtain or license may not cover our product candidates or may not provide us with sufficient
protection for our product candidates to afford a sustainable commercial advantage against competitive products or processes, including
those from branded, generic and over-the-counter pharmaceutical companies. In addition, we cannot guarantee that any patents or other
intellectual property rights will issue from any pending or future patent or other similar applications owned by or licensed to us. Even
if patents or other intellectual property rights have issued or will issue, we cannot guarantee that the claims of these patents and other
rights are or will be held valid or enforceable by the courts, through injunction or otherwise, or will provide us with any significant
protection against competitive products or otherwise be commercially valuable to us in every country of commercial significance that we
may target.
Competitors in the field
of immunology and oncology therapeutics have created a substantial amount of prior art, including scientific publications, posters, presentations,
patents and patent applications and other public disclosures including on the Internet. Our ability to obtain and maintain valid and enforceable
patents depends on whether the differences between our technology and the prior art allow our technology to be patentable over the prior
art. We do not have outstanding issued patents covering all of the recent developments in our technology and are unsure of the patent
protection that we will be successful in obtaining, if any. Even if the patents do successfully issue, third parties may design around
or challenge the validity, enforceability or scope of such issued patents or any other issued patents we own or license, which may result
in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. If the breadth or strength of protection provided by the patents we
hold or pursue with respect to our product candidates is challenged, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to develop
or threaten our ability to commercialize or finance our product candidates.
The laws of some foreign
jurisdictions do not provide intellectual property rights to the same extent or duration as in the United States, and many companies have
encountered significant difficulties in acquiring, maintaining, protecting, defending and especially enforcing such rights in foreign
jurisdictions. If we encounter such difficulties in protecting, or are otherwise precluded from effectively protecting, our intellectual
property in foreign jurisdictions, our business prospects could be substantially harmed, especially internationally.
Proprietary trade secrets
and unpatented know-how are also very important to our business. Although we have taken steps to protect our trade secrets and unpatented
know-how by entering into confidentiality agreements with third parties, and intellectual property protection agreements with officers,
directors, employees, and certain consultants and advisors, there can be no assurance that binding agreements will not be breached or
will be enforced by courts, that we would have adequate remedies for any breach, including injunctive and other equitable relief, or that
our trade secrets and unpatented know-how will not otherwise become known, inadvertently disclosed by us or our agents and representatives,
or be independently discovered by our competitors. If trade secrets are independently discovered, we would not be able to prevent their
use and if we and our agents or representatives inadvertently disclose trade secrets and/or unpatented know-how, we may not be allowed
to retrieve this and maintain the exclusivity we previously enjoyed.
We may not be able to protect
our intellectual property rights throughout the world.
Filing, prosecuting and defending
patents on our product candidates does not guarantee exclusivity. The requirements for patentability differ in certain countries, particularly
developing countries. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as
laws in the United States, especially when it comes to granting use and other kinds of patents and what kind of enforcement rights will
be allowed, especially injunctive relief in a civil infringement proceeding. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties
from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States and even in launching an identical version of our product notwithstanding
we have a valid patent in that country. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection
to develop their own products, or produce copy products, and, further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we
have patent protection but enforcement on infringing activities is inadequate or where we have no patents. These products may compete
with our products, and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.
Many companies have encountered
significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries,
particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly
those relating to pharmaceuticals, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing
products in violation of our proprietary rights generally. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result
in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our global patents at risk of
being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our global patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to
assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate or infringement actions brought against us, and the damages
or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful when we are the plaintiff. When we are the defendant we may be required
to post large bonds to stay in the market while we defend ourselves from an infringement action.
In addition, certain countries
in Europe and certain developing countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses
to third parties, especially if the patent owner does not enforce or use its patents over a protracted period of time. In some cases,
the courts will force compulsory licenses on the patent holder even when finding the patent holder’s patents are valid if the court
believes it is in the best interests of the country to have widespread access to an essential product covered by the patent. In these
situations, the royalty the court requires to be paid by the license holder receiving the compulsory license is not calculated at fair
market value and can be inconsequential, thereby adversely affecting the patent holder’s business. In these countries, we may have
limited remedies if our patents are infringed or if we are compelled to grant a license to our patents to a third-party, which could also
materially diminish the value of those patents. This would limit our potential revenue opportunities. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce
our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual
property that we own or license, especially in comparison to what we enjoy from enforcing our intellectual property rights in the Unites
States. Finally, our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights may be adversely affected by unforeseen changes in
both U.S. and foreign intellectual property laws, or changes to the policies in various government agencies in these countries, including
but not limited to the patent office issuing patents and the health agency issuing pharmaceutical product approvals. For example, in Brazil,
pharmaceutical patents require initial approval of the Brazilian health agency (ANVISA). Finally, many countries have large backlogs in
patent prosecution, and in some countries in Latin America it can take years, even decades, just to get a pharmaceutical patent application
reviewed notwithstanding the merits of the application.
Obtaining and maintaining patent protection
depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment, and other requirements imposed by governmental patent
agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.
Periodic maintenance and
annuity fees on any issued patent are due to be paid to the USPTO and foreign patent agencies in several stages over the lifetime of the
patent. The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment
and other similar provisions during the patent application process. While an inadvertent lapse can, in many cases, be cured by payment
of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which non-compliance can result in abandonment
or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction just
for failure to know about and/or timely pay a prosecution fee. Non-compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent
or patent application include failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees in prescribed
time periods, and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents in the format and style the country requires. If we or our
licensors fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our product candidates for any reason, our competitors might be
able to enter the market, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.
If we fail to comply with our obligations
under our intellectual property license agreements, we could lose license rights that are important to our business. Additionally, these
agreements may be subject to disagreement over contract interpretation, which could narrow the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual
property or technology or increase our financial or other obligations to our licensors.
We have entered into in-license
arrangements with respect to certain of our product candidates. These license agreements impose various diligence, milestone, royalty,
insurance and other obligations on us. If we fail to comply with these obligations, the respective licensors may have the right to terminate
the license, in which event we may not be able to develop or market the affected product candidate. The loss of such rights could materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.
If we are sued for infringing intellectual
property rights of third parties, such litigation could be costly and time consuming and could prevent or delay us from developing or
commercializing our product candidates.
Our commercial success depends
on our ability to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing
the proprietary rights of third parties. We cannot assure that marketing and selling such candidates and using such technologies will
not infringe existing or future patents. Numerous U.S.- and foreign-issued patents and pending patent applications owned by third parties
exist in the fields relating to our product candidates. As the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries expand and more patents are
issued, the risk increases that others may assert that our product candidates, technologies or methods of delivery or use infringe their
patent rights. Moreover, it is not always clear to industry participants, including us, which patents and other intellectual property
rights cover various drugs, biologics, drug delivery systems or their methods of use, and which of these patents may be valid and enforceable.
Thus, because of the large number of patents issued and patent applications filed in our fields across many countries, there may be a
risk that third parties may allege they have patent rights encompassing our product candidates, technologies or methods.
In addition, there may be
issued patents of third parties that are infringed or are alleged to be infringed by our product candidates or proprietary technologies
notwithstanding patents we may possess. Because some patent applications in the United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents
are issued, because patent applications in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months
after filing and because publications in the scientific literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that others
have not filed patent applications for technology covered by our own and in-licensed issued patents or our pending applications. Our competitors
may have filed, and may in the future file, patent applications covering our product candidates or technology similar to our technology.
Any such patent application may have priority over our own and in-licensed patent applications or patents, which could further require
us to obtain rights to issued patents covering such technologies, which may mean paying significant licensing fees or the like. If another
party has filed a U.S. patent application on inventions similar to those owned or in-licensed to us, or, in the case of in-licensed technology,
the licensor may have to participate, in the United States, in an interference proceeding to determine priority of invention.
We may be exposed to, or
threatened with, future litigation by third parties having patent or other intellectual property rights alleging that our product candidates
or proprietary technologies infringe such third parties’ intellectual property rights, including litigation resulting from filing
under Paragraph IV of the Hatch-Waxman Act or other countries’ laws similar to the Hatch-Waxman Act. These lawsuits could claim
that there are existing patent rights for such drug, and this type of litigation can be costly and could adversely affect our operating
results and divert the attention of managerial and technical personnel, even if we do not infringe such patents or the patents asserted
against us are ultimately established as invalid. There is a risk that a court would decide that we are infringing the third-party’s
patents and would order us to stop the activities covered by the patents. In addition, there is a risk that a court would order us to
pay the other party significant damages for having violated the other party’s patents.
Because we rely on certain
third-party licensors and partners and will continue to do so in the future, if one of our licensors or partners is sued for infringing
a third-party’s intellectual property rights, our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects could suffer in
the same manner as if we were sued directly. In addition to facing litigation risks, we have agreed to indemnify certain third-party licensors
and partners against claims of infringement caused by our proprietary technologies, and we have entered or may enter into cost-sharing
agreements with some our licensors and partners that could require us to pay some of the costs of patent litigation brought against those
third parties whether or not the alleged infringement is caused by our proprietary technologies. In certain instances, these cost-sharing
agreements could also require us to assume greater responsibility for infringement damages than would be assumed just on the basis of
our technology.
The occurrence of any of
the foregoing could adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.
We may be subject to claims that our officers,
directors, employees, consultants or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed to us alleged trade secrets of their former
employers or their former or current customers.
As is common in the biotechnology
and pharmaceutical industries, certain of our employees were formerly employed by other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including
our competitors or potential competitors. Moreover, we engage the services of consultants to assist us in the development of our products
and product candidates, many of whom were previously employed at, or may have previously been or are currently providing consulting services
to, other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. We may be subject to claims that
these employees and consultants or we have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information
of their former employers or their former or current customers. Although we have no knowledge of any such claims being alleged to date,
if such claims were to arise, litigation may be necessary to defend against any such claims. Even if we are successful in defending against
any such claims, any such litigation could be protracted, expensive, a distraction to our management team, not viewed favorably by investors
and other third parties, and may potentially result in an unfavorable outcome.
General Risk
Factors
If our information
technology systems or data, or those of third parties upon which we rely, are or were compromised, we could experience adverse consequences
resulting from such compromise, including, but not limited to, regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties;
disruptions of our business operations; loss of revenue or profits; interruptions to our operations such as our clinical trials; harm
to our reputation; loss of customers or sales; and other adverse consequences.
In the ordinary course of
our business, we may Process (as defined above) proprietary, confidential and sensitive information, including personal data (including,
key-coded data, health information and other special categories of personal data), intellectual property, trade secrets, and proprietary
business information owned or controlled by ourselves or other parties, or collectively, Sensitive Information.
We may use third-party service
providers and subprocessors to help us operate critical business systems to Process Sensitive Information on our behalf in a variety of
contexts, including without limitation, encryption and authentication technology, employee email, and other functions. Our ability to
monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited, and these third parties may not have adequate information
security measures in place. We may share or receive Sensitive Information with or from third parties.
If we, our service providers,
partners or other relevant third parties have experienced, or in the future experience, any security incident(s) that result in, any data
loss; deletion or destruction; unauthorized access to; loss, unauthorized acquisition, disclosure, or exposure of, Sensitive Information,
or compromise related to the security, confidentiality, integrity or availability of our (or their) information technology, software,
services, communications or data, or collectively, a Security Incident, it may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition,
operating results and prospects, including the diversion of funds to address the breach, and interruptions, delays, or outages in our
operations and development programs. In the first quarter of 2020, our email server was compromised in a cyber-attack. We quickly isolated
the incident and have, since, implemented additional risk prevention measures.
Cyberattacks, malicious internet-based
activity and online and offline fraud are prevalent and continue to increase. These threats are becoming increasingly difficult to detect.
These threats come from a variety of sources, including traditional computer “hackers”, threat actors, employee error, theft
or misuse, sophisticated nation-states, and nation-state supported actors. We and the third parties upon which we rely may be subject
to a variety of evolving threats, including but not limited to social-engineering attacks (including through phishing attacks); software
bugs; malicious code (such as viruses and worms); denial-of-service attacks (such as credential stuffing); malware (including as a result
of advanced persistent threat intrusions); supply-chain attacks, server malfunctions, software and hardware failures; loss of data or
other information technology assets; adware; natural disasters; terrorism; war; telecommunication and electrical failures; ransomware
attacks; and other similar threats.
Ransomware attacks, including
those from organized criminal threat actors, nation-states and nation-state supported actors, are becoming increasingly prevalent and
severe and can lead to significant interruptions, delays, or outages in our operations, loss of data, loss of income, significant extra
expenses to restore data or systems, reputational loss and the diversion of funds. To alleviate the financial, operational and reputational
impact of a ransomware attack, it may be preferable to make extortion payments, but we may be unwilling or unable to do so (including,
for example, if applicable laws or regulations prohibit such payments).
Similarly, supply chain attacks
have increased in frequency and severity, and we cannot guarantee that third parties and infrastructure in our supply chain have not been
compromised or that they do not contain exploitable defects or bugs that could result in a breach of or disruption to our systems and
networks or the systems and networks of third parties that support us and our services. We may also be the subject of server malfunction,
software or hardware failures, loss of data or other computer assets, and other similar issues. A significant portion of our workforce
and third-party partners work remotely from time to time, and reliance on remote working technologies and the prevalent use of mobile
devices that access confidential and personal data information increase the risk of Security Incidents, which could lead to the loss confidential
information, personal data, trade secrets or other intellectual property.
We may be required to expend
additional, significant resources, fundamentally change our business activities and practices, or modify our operations, including our
clinical trial activities, or information technology in an effort to protect against Security Incidents and to mitigate, detect, and remediate
actual and potential vulnerabilities. Certain data privacy and security obligations may require us to implement specific security measures
or use industry-standard or reasonable measures to protect our information technology systems and Sensitive Information. Even if we were
to take and have taken security measures designed to protect against Security Incidents, there can be no assurance that such security
measures or those of our service providers, partners and other third parties will be effective in protecting against all Security Incidents
and material adverse impacts that may arise from such Security Incidents. We may be unable in the future to detect vulnerabilities in
our information technology systems because such threats and techniques change frequently, are often sophisticated in nature, and may not
be detected until after a Security Incident has occurred. Despite our efforts to identify and remediate vulnerabilities, if any, in our
information technology systems, our efforts may not be successful. Further, we may experience delays in developing and deploying remedial
measures designed to address any such identified vulnerabilities.
If we (or a third-party
upon whom we rely) experience a Security Incident or are perceived to have experienced a Security Incident, we may experience adverse
consequences. These consequences may include: government enforcement actions (for example, investigations, fines, penalties, audits,
and inspections); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; restrictions on processing sensitive information (including personal
data); litigation (including class claims); indemnification obligations; negative publicity; reputational harm; monetary fund diversions;
interruptions in our operations (including availability of data); financial loss; and other similar harms. In addition, our actual or
prospective customers, collaborators, partners and/or clinical trial participants may stop using our product candidates or working with
us. This discontinuance, or failure to meet the expectations of such third parties, could result in material harm to our operations,
financial performance or reputation and affect our ability to grow and operate our business.
Failures or significant downtime
of our information technology or telecommunication systems or those used by our third-party service providers could cause significant
interruptions in our operations and adversely impact the confidentiality, integrity and availability of Sensitive Information, including
preventing us from conducting clinical trials, tests or research and development activities and prevent us from managing the administrative
aspects of our business.
Applicable Data Protection
Requirements (as defined below) may require us to notify relevant stakeholders of Security Incidents, including affected individuals,
partners, collaborators, customers, regulators, law enforcement agencies, credit reporting agencies and others. Such disclosures are costly,
and the disclosures or the failure to comply with such requirements could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition,
operating results and prospects.
Our contracts may not contain
limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that any limitations or exclusions of liability in our contracts
would be enforceable or adequate or would otherwise protect us from liabilities or damages if we fail to comply with Data Protection Requirements
related to information security or Security Incidents.
We cannot be sure that our
insurance coverage will be adequate or otherwise protect us from or adequately mitigate liabilities or damages with respect to claims,
costs, expenses, litigation, fines, penalties, business loss, data loss, regulatory actions or material adverse impacts arising out of
our Processing operations, privacy and security practices, or Security Incidents we may experience. The successful assertion of one or
more large claims against us that exceeds our available insurance coverage, or results in changes to our insurance policies (including
premium increases or the imposition of large excess or deductible or co-insurance requirements), could materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition, operating results and prospects.
We are subject to stringent and changing
obligations related to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory
investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; a disruption of our business operations, including our clinical trials; harm
to our reputation; and other adverse effects on our business or prospects.
In the ordinary course of
business, we collect, receive, store, process, use, generate, transfer, disclose, make accessible, protect, secure, dispose of, transmit,
and share, or collectively, Process or Processing of, personal data and other sensitive and confidential information, including information
we collect about patients in connection with clinical trials, sensitive third-party data or, as necessary to operate our business, for
legal and marketing purposes, and for other business-related purposes.
Accordingly, we are, or
may become, subject to numerous federal, state, local and international data privacy and security laws, regulations, guidance and industry
standards as well as external and internal privacy and security policies, contracts and other obligations that apply to the Processing
of personal data by us and on our behalf, collectively, Data Protection Requirements. The number and scope of Data Protection Requirements
are changing, subject to differing applications and interpretations, and may be inconsistent between jurisdictions or in conflict with
each other. If we fail, or are perceived to have failed, to address or comply with Data Protection Requirements, we could face significant
consequences. These consequences may include, but are not limited to, government enforcement actions against us that could include investigations,
fines, penalties, audits and inspections, additional reporting requirements and/or oversight, temporary or permanent bans on all or some
Processing of personal data, orders to destroy or not use personal data, and imprisonment of company officials (for example, under the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996). Further, individuals or other relevant stakeholders could bring a variety
of claims against us for our actual or perceived failure to comply with the Data Protection Requirements. Any of these events could have
a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, or financial condition, and could lead to a loss of actual or prospective customers,
collaborators or partners; interrupt or stop clinical trials; result in an inability to Process personal data or to operate in certain
jurisdictions; limit our ability to develop or commercialize our products; or require us to revise or restructure our operations, or
each, a material adverse impact.
We are, or may become, subject
to U.S. privacy laws. For example, in the United States, there are a broad variety of data protection laws and regulations that may apply
to our activities such as state data breach notification laws, state personal data privacy laws (for example, the California Consumer
Privacy Act of 2018, or CCPA), state health information privacy laws, and federal and state consumer protection laws.
The CCPA requires covered
businesses that process personal data of California residents to disclose their data collection, use and sharing practices. Further, the
CCPA provides California residents with new data privacy rights (including the ability to opt out of the sale of personal data), imposes
new operational requirements for covered businesses, provides for civil penalties for violations (up to $7,500 per violation), as well
as a private right of action for certain data breaches (that is expected to increase data breach class action litigation and result in
significant exposure to costly legal judgements and settlements). Aspects of the CCPA and its interpretation and enforcement remain uncertain.
Further, the new California Privacy Rights Act, or CPRA, substantially expands the CCPA’s requirements effective January 1, 2023.
The CPRA, among other things, gives California residents the ability to limit use of certain sensitive personal data, establish restrictions
on the retention of personal data, expand the types of data breaches subject to the CCPA’s private right of action, and establish
a new California Privacy Protection Agency to implement and enforce the new law. Although there are limited exemptions for clinical trial
data under the CCPA and the CPRA, the CCPA and the CPRA may increase compliance costs and potential liability with respect to other personal
data we maintain about California residents. Other states have enacted data privacy laws as well. For example, Virginia passed its Consumer
Data Protection Act, which went into effect on January 1, 2023, and Colorado passed the Colorado Privacy Act, which will go into effect
on July 1, 2023, both of which differ from the CPRA. The federal government is also considering comprehensive privacy legislation.
Outside the United States,
an increasing number of laws, regulations, and industry standards apply to data privacy and security. For example, the European Union’s
General Data Protection Regulation, or EU GDPR, the United Kingdom’s GDPR, or UK GDPR, and Brazil’s General Data Protection
Law (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, or LGPD) (Law No. 13,709/2018) impose strict requirements for processing personal
data. For example, under the EU GDPR, government regulators may impose temporary or definitive bans on data processing, as well as fines
of up to 20 million euros or 4% of annual global revenue, whichever is greater. Further, individuals may initiate litigation related to
processing of their personal data.
European data protection
laws (including the EU GDPR and UK GDRP) are wide-ranging in scope and impose numerous, significant and complex compliance burdens in
relation to the Processing of personal data, such as: limiting permitted Processing of personal data to only that which is necessary for
specified, explicit and legitimate purposes; requiring the establishment of a legal basis for Processing personal data; broadening the
definition of personal data; creating obligations for controllers and processors to appoint data protection officers in certain circumstances;
increasing transparency obligations to data subjects; introducing the obligation to carry out data protection impact assessments in certain
circumstances; establishing limitations on the collection and retention of personal data through “data minimization” and “storage
limitation” principles; introducing obligations to honor increased rights for data subjects; formalizing a heightened standard to
obtain data subject consent; establishing obligations to implement certain technical and organizational safeguards to protect the security
and confidentiality of personal data; introducing the obligation to provide notice of certain significant personal data breaches to the
relevant supervisory authority(ies) and affected individuals; and mandating the appointment of representatives in the UK and/or EU in
certain circumstances. In particular, the Processing of “special categor[ies] [of] personal data” (such as personal data related
to health and genetic information), which could be relevant to our operations in the context of our clinical trials, imposes heightened
compliance burdens under European data protection laws and is a topic of active interest among relevant regulators.
Certain jurisdictions have
enacted data localization laws and cross-border personal data transfer laws, which could make it more difficult to transfer information
across jurisdictions (such as transferring or receiving personal data that originates in the EU or in other foreign jurisdictions). Existing
mechanisms that facilitate cross-border personal data transfers may change or be invalidated. For example, absent appropriate safeguards
or other circumstances, the EU GDPR generally restricts the transfer of personal data to countries outside of the European Economic Area,
or EEA, that the European Commission does not consider to provide an adequate level of data privacy and security, such as the United States.
The European Commission released a set of “Standard Contractual Clauses,” or SCCs, that are designed to be a valid mechanism
to facilitate personal data transfers out of the EEA to these jurisdictions. Currently, these SCCs are a valid mechanism to transfer personal
data outside of the EEA, but there exists some uncertainty regarding whether the SCCs will remain a valid mechanism. Additionally, the
SCCs impose additional compliance burdens, such as conducting transfer impact assessments to determine whether additional security measures
are necessary to protect the at-issue personal data.
In addition, Switzerland
and the UK similarly restrict personal data transfers outside of those jurisdictions to countries that they do not consider to provide
an adequate level of personal data protection, such as the United States, and certain countries outside Europe (e.g., Brazil) have also
passed or are considering laws requiring local data residency or otherwise impeding the transfer of personal data across borders, any
of which could increase the cost and complexity of doing business.
If we cannot implement a
valid compliance mechanism for cross-border data transfers, we may face increased exposure to regulatory actions, substantial fines, and
injunctions against processing or transferring personal data from Europe or other foreign jurisdictions. Inability to import personal
data to the United States may significantly and negatively impact our business operations, including by limiting our ability to conduct
clinical trial activities in Europe and elsewhere; limiting our ability to collaborate with parties subject to European and other data
protection laws or requiring us to increase our personal data processing capabilities in Europe and/or elsewhere at significant expense.
These laws exemplify the
vulnerability of our business to the evolving regulatory environment related to personal data and may require us to modify our Processing
practices at substantial costs and expenses in an effort to comply. Given the breadth and evolving nature of Data Protection Requirements,
preparing for and complying with these requirements is rigorous, time-intensive and requires significant resources and a review of our
technologies, systems and practices, as well as those of any third-party collaborators, service providers, contractors or consultants
that Process personal data on our behalf.
We may publish privacy policies
and other documentation regarding our Processing of personal data and/or other confidential, proprietary or sensitive information. Although
we endeavor to comply with our published policies and other documentation, we may at times fail to do so or may be perceived to have failed
to do so. Moreover, despite our efforts, we may not be successful in achieving compliance if our employees, third-party collaborators,
service providers, contractors or consultants fail to comply with our policies and documentation. Such failures can subject us to potential
regulatory action if they are found to be deceptive, unfair, or misrepresentative of our actual practices. Moreover, subjects about whom
we or our partners obtain information, as well as the providers who share this information with us, may contractually limit our ability
to use and disclose the information. Claims that we have violated individuals’ privacy rights or failed to comply with data protection
laws or applicable privacy notices even if we are not found liable, could be expensive and time-consuming to defend and could result in
adverse publicity that could harm our business or have other material adverse impacts.