SCE-D Southern California Edison Company

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 31, 2022

Registration Nos. 333-260838

and 333-260838-01

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

Amendment No. 1

to

FORM SF-1

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JANUARY 31, 2022

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

$533,265,000 Senior Secured Recovery Bonds, Series 2022-A

Southern California Edison Company

Sponsor, Depositor and Initial Servicer

Central Index Key Number: 000092103

SCE Recovery Funding LLC

Issuing Entity

Central Index Key Number: 001826571

The total initial price to the public is $                . The total amount of the underwriting discounts and commissions is $                . The total amount of proceeds to the issuing entity before deduction of expenses (estimated to be $                ) is $                . The distribution frequency is semi-annually. The first expected payment date is                .

Investing in the Senior Secured Recovery Bonds involves risks. Please read “Risk Factors” beginning on page 23 in this prospectus to read about factors you should consider before buying the bonds.

Southern California Edison Company, as sponsor, is offering $533,265,000 of Senior Secured Recovery Bonds, Series 2022-A, referred to herein as the bonds, in three tranches to be issued by SCE Recovery Funding LLC, as the issuing entity. Southern California Edison Company is also the seller, initial servicer and depositor with regard to the bonds. The bonds are senior secured obligations of the issuing entity supported by recovery property, which includes the right to a special, irrevocable nonbypassable charge, known as fixed recovery charges, paid by all existing and future consumers (subject to the exceptions described in this prospectus) within SCE’s service territory as it existed on the date of the financing order (as defined below). The Wildfire Financing Law (as defined below) requires that fixed recovery charges be adjusted (or “trued-up”) at least annually, and the California Public Utilities Commission (the CPUC or the California commission) has authorized the fixed recovery charges to be adjusted more frequently to ensure the expected recovery of fixed recovery charge revenues sufficient to timely provide all scheduled payments of principal and interest on the bonds and related financing costs, as described further in this prospectus. Credit enhancement for the bonds will be provided by the “true-up mechanism” as well as by accounts held under the indenture.

The bonds will be issued pursuant to Article 5.8 of Chapter 4 of the California Public Utilities Code, as amended (the Wildfire Financing Law), and an irrevocable financing order issued by the CPUC on October 21, 2021 approving the issuance of the bonds. The CPUC’s obligations under the Wildfire Financing Law and the financing order are irrevocable and the CPUC shall neither reduce, alter nor impair the fixed recovery charges authorized under a financing order, except for the true-up adjustments to the fixed recovery charges.

The bonds represent obligations only of the issuing entity, SCE Recovery Funding LLC, and do not represent obligations of the sponsor or any of its affiliates other than the issuing entity. The bonds are secured by the collateral, consisting principally of the recovery property acquired pursuant to the sale agreement and funds on deposit in the collection account for the bonds and related subaccounts. Please read “Security for the Bonds” in this prospectus. The bonds are not a debt or liability of the State of California, the California Public Utilities Commission or any other governmental agency or instrumentality. The bonds are not a charge on the full faith and credit or the taxing power of the State of California or any governmental agency or instrumentality.

Southern California Edison has sponsored, and we have previously issued another series of bonds, herein described and referred to as the Series 2021-A Bonds, pursuant to the Wildfire Financing Law. These prior bonds are issued pursuant to a separate financing order and are secured by separate fixed recovery charges, separate recovery property and separate collateral.

Interest will accrue on the bonds from the date of issuance. The bonds are scheduled to pay principal and interest semi-annually on May 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning on November 15, 2022. The first scheduled payment date is November 15, 2022. On each payment date, each bond will be entitled to payment of principal, sequentially, but only to the extent funds are available in the collection account after payment of certain fees and expenses and after payment of interest.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

The underwriters expect to deliver the bonds through the book-entry facilities of The Depository Trust Company against payment in immediately available funds on or about                 , 2022.

Joint Bookrunners

The date of this prospectus is                , 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- i -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- ii -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- iii -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- iv -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

- v -

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

This prospectus is part of a registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. This prospectus provides information about us, the bonds and Southern California Edison Company, or SCE, the depositor, sponsor and initial servicer. This prospectus describes the terms of the bonds offered hereby. You should carefully review this prospectus, any free writing prospectus the issuing entity files with the SEC, and the information, if any, contained in the documents referenced in this prospectus under the heading “Where You Can Find More Information”.

References in this prospectus to the term we, us, or the issuing entity mean SCE Recovery Funding LLC, the entity which will issue the bonds. References to the recovery bonds or the bonds, unless the context otherwise requires, mean the bonds offered pursuant to this prospectus. References to SCE, the seller, the depositor or the sponsor mean Southern California Edison Company. References to the bondholders or the holders refer to the registered holders of the bonds. References to the recovery property mean the recovery property sold to us by SCE pursuant to the sale agreement and pledged to the payment of the bonds. References to the servicer refer to SCE and any successor servicer under the servicing agreement referred to in this prospectus. References to the California commission or CPUC refer to the California Public Utilities Commission. References to the Wildfire Financing Law refer to Article 5.8 of Chapter 4 of the California Public Utilities Code, as amended. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to a financing order are to the irrevocable Financing Order issued by the CPUC as Decision 21-10-025, on October 21, 2021. Unless the context otherwise requires, the term customer means “consumer” within the meaning of Wildfire Financing Law. Under the Wildfire Financing Law, “consumer” is defined as any existing or future individual, governmental body, trust, business entity, or nonprofit organization located in the service territory of SCE as of the date of the financing order that consumes electricity that has been transmitted or distributed by means of electric transmission or distribution facilities, whether those electric transmission or distribution facilities are owned by the consumer, SCE, or any other party. References to ESPs refer to electric service providers as defined in the glossary. You can find a glossary of some of the other defined terms we use in this prospectus on page 136 of this prospectus.

We have included cross-references to sections in this prospectus where you can find further related discussions. You can also find key topics in the preceding pages. Check the table of contents to locate these sections.

You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus and in any free writing prospectus from us or the underwriters specifying the terms of this offering. Neither we nor any underwriter, agent, dealer, salesperson, the California commission or SCE has authorized anyone else to provide you with any different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not offering to sell the bonds in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. The information in this prospectus and any free writing prospectus is current only as of the date of this prospectus.

- 1 -

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This prospectus includes forward-looking statements, including regarding expectations, estimates and projections about the electric consumption of customers, SCE’s ability to service the recovery property and collect the fixed recovery charges, the issuing entity’s ability to pay back the bonds, and the California commission’s adherence to the State pledge to protect the rights of bondholders. Any statements that express, or involve discussions as to, expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events of performance (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as “will,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “believe,” “could,” “should,” “estimated,” “may,” “plans to,” “potential,” “projection,” “designed to,” “intended”) are not statements of historical facts and may be forward-looking. Forward-looking statements involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties. Accordingly, any such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to important factors included in “Risk Factors” (in addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with such forward-looking statements) that could have a significant impact on financial results, and could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of us or SCE, in this prospectus, in presentations, on websites, in response to questions or otherwise.

The following are some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements in this prospectus:

- 2 -

You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, including unanticipated events, after the date on which such statement is made, except as required by law. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

- 3 -

- 4 -

- 5 -

- 6 -

- 7 -

- 8 -

- 9 -

- 10 -

- 11 -

- 12 -

- 13 -

- 14 -

- 15 -

- 16 -

- 17 -

- 18 -

- 19 -

- 20 -

- 21 -

- 22 -

RISK FACTORS

Please carefully consider all the information we have included or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, including the risks described below and the statements contained under the heading “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” in this prospectus before deciding whether to invest in the bonds.

You may experience material payment delays or incur a loss on your investment in the bonds because the source of funds for payment is limited

The only source of funds for payment of the bonds will be the collateral, which consist of:

The bonds will not be insured or guaranteed by SCE, including in its capacity as sponsor, depositor, seller or servicer, or by its parent, Edison International, any of their respective affiliates, the trustee or any other person or entity. The bonds will be nonrecourse obligations, secured only by the collateral. Delays in payment on the bonds might result in a reduction in the market value of the bonds and, therefore, the value of your investment in the bonds.

Thus, you must rely for payment of the bonds solely upon the Wildfire Financing Law, state and federal constitutional rights to enforcement of the Wildfire Financing Law, the irrevocable financing order, collections of the fixed recovery charges and funds on deposit in the related accounts held by the trustee. If these amounts are not sufficient to make payments or there are delays in recoveries, you may experience material payment delays or incur a loss on your investment in the bonds. Our organizational documents restrict our right to acquire other assets unrelated to the transactions described in this prospectus. Please read “SCE Recovery Funding LLC, The Issuing Entity” in this prospectus.

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH POTENTIAL JUDICIAL, LEGISLATIVE

OR REGULATORY ACTIONS

We are not obligated to indemnify you for changes in law

Neither we nor SCE will indemnify you for any changes in the law, including any federal preemption or repeal or amendment of the Wildfire Financing Law, that may affect the value of your bonds. SCE will agree in the sale agreement to institute any action or proceeding as may be reasonably necessary to block or overturn any attempts to cause a repeal, modification or amendment to the Wildfire Financing Law that would be materially adverse to us, the trustee or bondholders. However, SCE may not be able to take such action and, if SCE does take action, such action may not be successful. Although SCE or any successor seller might be required to indemnify us if legal action based on the law in effect at the time of the issuance of the bonds invalidates the recovery property, such indemnification obligations do not apply for any changes in law after the date the bonds are issued, whether such changes in law are effected by means of any legislative enactment, any constitutional amendment or any final and non-appealable judicial decision. Please read “The Sale Agreement—Seller Representations and Warranties” and “The Servicing Agreement—Servicing Standards and Covenants” in this prospectus.

Future judicial action could reduce the value of your investment in the bonds

The recovery property is created pursuant to the Wildfire Financing Law, the financing order and the issuance advice letter relating to the bonds. The Wildfire Financing Law, as last amended, became effective on

- 23 -

January 1, 2020. With our issuance of the Series 2021-A Bonds, SCE became the first utility to issue recovery bonds under the Wildfire Financing Law.

The Wildfire Financing Law or any provisions thereof might be directly contested in courts or otherwise become the subject of litigation. In addition, the financing order or any provision thereof might be directly contested in courts or otherwise become the subject of litigation. As of the date of this prospectus, no such litigation has arisen. A constitutional challenge has been brought challenging Public Utilities Code Division 1, Part 6 of the California Public Utilities Code (the “Wildfire Fund Law”), which authorized the imposition by the CPUC of a non-bypassable charge by each electric utility in the State of California to fund the State of California’s Wildfire Fund. The Wildfire Fund Law was enacted in the same legislation (AB 1054) which amended the Wildfire Financing Law. In June 2020, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, and plaintiffs subsequently filed a notice of appeal in the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal in December 2021. The plaintiffs have filed a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc in January 2022, which is pending before the Ninth Circuit. The lawsuit does not challenge the Wildfire Financing Law. If, however, the dismissal of the lawsuit is reversed, it is possible that this might provoke a challenge to the Wildfire Financing Law or the financing order. If a lawsuit challenging the Wildfire Financing Law is instituted in the future, such lawsuit may be successful. If an invalidation of any relevant underlying legislative provision or the Wildfire Financing Law provision were to result from such litigation, you might lose some or all of your investment or you might experience delays in recovering your investment.

California and other states have passed laws permitting the securitization of electrical corporation costs similar to the Wildfire Financing Law, such as costs associated with the deregulation of the electric market, environmental control costs or hurricane recovery costs. Some of the laws have been challenged by judicial actions or in utility commission proceedings. To date, none of these challenges has succeeded, but future challenges might be made. An unfavorable decision regarding another state’s law would not automatically invalidate the Wildfire Financing Law or the financing order, but it might provoke a challenge to the Wildfire Financing Law, establish a legal precedent for a successful challenge to the Wildfire Financing Law or heighten awareness of the political and other risks of the bonds, and in that way may limit the liquidity and value of the bonds. Therefore, legal activity in other states may indirectly affect the value of your investment in the bonds.

Future state legislative action, including a voter initiative, might attempt to reduce the value of your investment in the bonds

In the Wildfire Financing Law, the State has pledged that it will neither limit nor alter the fixed recovery charges, recovery property, financing orders of the CPUC, or any rights thereunder until the bonds, together with the interest thereon, are fully paid and discharged. For a description of the State pledge, please read “The Recovery Property and the Wildfire Financing Law—The Financing Order and the Recovery Property—State Pledge” in this prospectus. However, the Wildfire Financing Law further provides that nothing in this pledge precludes the State from limiting or altering the fixed recovery charges, recovery property or any financing order of the CPUC, if and when adequate provision is made by law for the protection of SCE, owners of recovery property and holders of bonds. It is unclear what “adequate provision” would be afforded to holders of bonds by the State if such limitation or alteration were attempted. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that any such provision would not adversely affect the market value of the bonds, or the timing of receipt of payments with respect to the bonds.

In addition, under California law, the electorate has the right, through its initiative powers, to propose statutes as well as amendments to the California Constitution. Generally, any matter that is a proper subject of legislation can become the subject of an initiative. Among other procedural requirements, in order for an initiative measure to qualify for an election, the initiative measure must be submitted to the California Attorney General and a petition signed by electors constituting five percent, in the case of a statutory initiative, and eight percent, in the case of a constitutional initiative, of the votes cast at the immediately preceding gubernatorial

- 24 -

election must be submitted to the California Secretary of State. To become effective, the initiative must then be approved by a majority vote of the electors voting at the next general election.

As of the date of this prospectus, we are not aware of any pending legislation in the California legislature or of any pending California voter initiative that would materially and adversely affect any of the provisions of the Wildfire Financing Law. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that a repeal or amendment of the Wildfire Financing Law will not be adopted or sought, either by the California legislature, or the electorate acting through its initiative powers, or that any action or refusal to act by the State of California will not occur, any of which may constitute a violation of the State pledge with the holders. If a violation of the State pledge occurred, costly and time-consuming litigation might ensue regardless of the outcome of such litigation. Any litigation might materially adversely affect the price of the bonds and your ability to resell the bonds and might delay the timing of payments on the bonds. Moreover, given the lack of controlling precedent directly addressing the bonds and the State pledge, we cannot predict the outcome of any litigation with certainty, and, accordingly, you could experience a delay in receipt of payments on or incur a loss on your investment in the bonds.

The California commission might attempt to take actions that could reduce the value of your investment in the bonds

The Wildfire Financing Law provides that a financing order is irrevocable and that the California commission may not directly or indirectly, by any subsequent action, rescind or amend a financing order or reduce or impair the fixed recovery charges authorized under a financing order, except for the true-up adjustments to the fixed recovery charges. However, the California commission retains the power to adopt, revise or rescind rules or regulations affecting SCE.

For instance, the California commission adopted new customer protection regulations in June 2020 that adopted additional consumer protections and made permanent some, and extended others, of the temporary customer protection regulations enacted in response to COVID-19 that may extend the time it takes to complete the process of disconnecting customers for nonpayment or completely prevent disconnections in excess of certain set thresholds. Please read “The Depositor, Seller, Initial Servicer and Sponsor—Billing and Collections” and “The Depositor, Seller, Initial Servicer and Sponsor—COVID-19 Customer Protections” in this prospectus. Any new or amended regulations or orders from the California commission might affect the ability of the servicer to disconnect customers for nonpayment or prevent disconnections in excess of certain regional thresholds, which may ultimately impact SCE’s ability to collect fixed recovery charges in full, and on a timely basis, which may negatively impact, the rating of the bonds or their price and, accordingly, the amortization of the bonds and their weighted average lives.

The servicer is required to submit with the California commission, on our behalf, certain adjustments of the fixed recovery charges. Please read “SCE’s Financing Order—Fixed Recovery Charges—The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically “True-Up” the Fixed Recovery Charge” and “The Servicing Agreement—True-Up Adjustment Letters” in this prospectus. Challenges to or delays in the true-up process might adversely affect the market perception and valuation of the bonds. Also, any litigation, as well as being costly and time-consuming, might materially delay fixed recovery charge collections due to delayed implementation of true-up adjustments and might result in missing payments or payment delays and lengthened weighted average lives of the bonds.

The servicer may not fulfill its obligations to act on behalf of the bondholders to protect bondholders from actions by the California commission or the State of California, or the servicer may be unsuccessful in any such attempt

The servicer will agree in the servicing agreement to take any action or proceeding necessary to compel performance by the CPUC and the State of California of any of their obligations or duties under the Wildfire Financing Law or the financing order, including any actions reasonably necessary to block or overturn attempts

- 25 -

to cause a repeal or modification of the Wildfire Financing Law or the financing order. The servicer, however, may not be able to take those actions for a number of reasons, including due to legal or regulatory restrictions, financial constraints and practical difficulties in successfully challenging any such legislative enactment or constitutional amendment. Additionally, any action the servicer is able to take may not be successful. Any such failure to perform its obligations or to successfully compel performance by the CPUC or the State of California could negatively affect bondholders’ rights and result in a loss of their investment.

A municipal entity or tribal utility might assert the right to acquire portions of SCE’s electric facilities and/or serve the load of customers within their jurisdictional areas and avoid or reduce the affected customers’ payment of the fixed recovery charges

California law authorizes certain local municipalities to seek to acquire portions of SCE’s electric facilities through the power of eminent domain for use as part of municipally-owned utility systems and serve customers with those facilities. Additionally, local municipalities may extend their own facilities to take over service of customers located within their jurisdictional areas, which may overlap with SCE’s service territory. Moreover, tribal governments may operate their own utilities and, from time to time, may assert the right to acquire SCE’s facilities located within the borders of tribal land through the power of eminent domain. These circumstances involve what is referred to under existing tariffs as municipal departing load (Municipal DL), where the affected customers are no longer interconnected with SCE’s electric facilities. The last tribal annexation occurred in 2017 and involved 25 consumers and the last municipal annexation occurred in 2018 and involved 162 consumers; in each case the departing consumers were primarily residential consumers. As the date of this prospectus, we are not aware of any local municipality or tribe that is actively seeking or threatening to acquire portions of SCE’s electric distribution system.

The Wildfire Financing Law provides that the fixed recovery charges must be paid by all existing and future customers within SCE’s service territory as it existed on the date of the financing order. The financing order provides that consumers that no longer take transmission and distribution retail service (including Municipal DL customers) or that otherwise depart or reduce SCE service after the date of the financing order, or that meet relevant criteria in the applicable tariff, will be treated as departing load (DL) customers. DL customers, including Municipal DL customers, are required to pay the fixed recovery charge based on approaches that are consistent with the methods in place for other nonbypassable charges. SCE’s DL tariffs provide for calculation of certain nonbypassable charges based on consumption as metered or estimated. SCE has administered Municipal DL tariffs by reaching an agreement with the Municipal DL customer or the local municipality serving the Municipal DL customer for the payment of one or more lump sums based on a mutually acceptable estimate of the Municipal DL customer’s nonbypassable cost obligations, which include charges similar to the fixed recovery charges. No assurance can be provided that such agreements will be reached in the future with respect to Municipal DL, and any failure to reach such an agreement could result in litigation or otherwise make it difficult to collect the fixed recovery charges (including any lump sum payment). Please read “The Depositor, Seller, Initial Servicer and Sponsor—Municipalization; Municipal Departing Load” and “—Successors” in this prospectus. If such agreements relating to Municipal DL are, however, reached, the payments allocable to the fixed recovery charges will constitute recovery property.

The Wildfire Financing Law also specifies that any successor to an electric utility shall perform and satisfy all obligations of the electric utility pursuant to the Wildfire Financing Law, including collecting and paying to the bondholders revenues arising with respect to the recovery property. In the servicing agreement, SCE will covenant to assert in an appropriate forum that any municipality that acquires any portion of SCE’s electric distribution facilities must be treated as a successor to SCE under the Wildfire Financing Law and the financing order and that retail customers in such municipalities remain responsible for payment of fixed recovery charges. No assurance can be provided that such assertion will be accepted by a municipality or sustained by a court. Please read “The Recovery Property and the Wildfire Financing Law—The Financing Order and the Recovery Property—The Wildfire Financing Law Requires the Electrical Corporation and its Successors to Service the Recovery Property” in this prospectus.

- 26 -

Despite these provisions of the Wildfire Financing Law and the financing order, the involved municipality or tribe might assert that its customers are not responsible for payment of fixed recovery charges or that it is not responsible for collecting the charges, and as a result, SCE may find collection of fixed recovery charges from such customers difficult or impractical or the recovery of such charges to be delayed. In any such case, there can be no assurance that the fixed recovery charges will be collected from customers of municipally-owned utilities who were formerly customers of SCE. Any decrease in the customer base from which fixed recovery charges are collected might result in missing payments or payment delays and lengthened weighted average lives of the bonds.

In the financing order, the California commission has committed, in furtherance of the State pledge, in connection with any Commission proceeding to review the municipalization of SCE facilities by an entity that does not set retail rates subject to the California commission, to establish conditions to the approval of such municipalization transaction by the California commission which either (a) establish procedures to ensure that such entity will continue to bill and collect fixed recovery charges from customers and remit such collections to SCE or a new servicer for the bonds or (b) ensure the upfront funding of the fixed recovery charges that would otherwise be paid by customers where rate payment would be affected by the ownership change. Whether and how the law giving the California commission jurisdiction to approve a public entity’s acquisition of electric or gas assets would be applied to a municipalization or tribal condemnation has not been tested, and no assurance can be provided that the provisions of the financing order referenced herein will be successfully implemented. Please read “SCE’s Financing Order—Fixed Recovery Charges—The Financing Order Provides that Fixed Recovery Charges are Nonbypassable” in this prospectus.

It may be difficult to estimate and accurately collect fixed recovery charges from customers who self-generate and who disconnect from SCE’s grid

Broader use of distributed generation by customers may result from customers’ changing perceptions of the merits of utilizing existing generation technology, tax or other economic incentives or from technological developments resulting in smaller-scale, more fuel efficient, more environmentally friendly and/or more cost effective distributed generation. Moreover, an increase in distributed generation may result if extreme weather conditions result in shortages of grid-supplied energy or if other factors cause grid-supplied energy to be less reliable. More widespread use of distributed generation, particularly battery storage, might allow greater numbers of customers to reduce or eliminate their payment of fixed recovery charges causing fixed recovery charges to remaining consumers to increase.

Under current CPUC decisions, customers taking net energy metering (NEM) service with solar generation are billed on a net-metered basis. Pursuant to the financing order, fixed recovery charges will be imposed on customers taking NEM service on each kWh of electricity imported from SCE net of exports from such customer for each metered interval. Please read “The Depositor, Seller, Initial Servicer and Sponsor—Community Choice Aggregation, Direct Access and Departing Load” in this prospectus.

In respect of other customers who self-generate, but do not take NEM service, the financing order provides that customers that no longer take transmission and distribution retail service or that otherwise depart or reduce SCE service after the date of the financing order, or that meet relevant criteria in the applicable tariff, will be treated as DL customers. The financing order provides that these self-generating DL customers will be required to pay fixed recovery charges consistent with the methodology in place under existing DL tariffs for the payment of other nonbypassable charges by such customers, except as stated below. This methodology requires that the fixed recovery charge be imposed on DL customers based upon the consumption displaced by the new generation. Please read “The Depositor, Seller, Initial Servicer and Sponsor—Community Choice Aggregation, Direct Access and Departing Load” “in this prospectus. The financing order does not limit the California commission’s or SCE’s discretion to modify DL tariffs in the future, but does provide assurance that fixed recovery charges will be recovered from customers consistent with the method set forth in the DL tariffs in place as of the date of the financing order.

- 27 -

However, current DL tariffs do not require the payment of nonbypassable charges on DL customers (other than Municipal DL customers) that terminate service and disconnect from SCE’s grid. While the financing order provides that such customers remain responsible for payment of fixed recovery charges, it may be difficult for SCE to collect fixed recovery charges from these disconnected (former) customers, and these customers may dispute their obligation to pay the fixed recovery charge, thus potentially adversely impacting the timing and receipt of fixed recovery charge collections.

SERVICING RISKS

Inaccurate consumption or collection forecasting might reduce scheduled payments on the bonds

The fixed recovery charges are assessed based on forecasted customer usage. The amount and the rate of fixed recovery charge collections will depend in part on actual electricity consumption and the amount of collections and write-offs. The fixed recovery charges are calculated by the servicer according to the methodology approved in the financing order, which includes the allocation of cost responsibility among FRC consumer classes based upon the cost responsibilities approved in SCE’s most recent GRC or related proceeding. If the servicer inaccurately forecasts either electricity consumption or underestimates customer delinquency or write-offs when setting or adjusting the fixed recovery charge, there could be a shortfall or material delay in fixed recovery charge collections, which might result in missed or delayed payments of principal and interest and lengthened weighted average life of the bonds. Please read “SCE’s Financing Order—Fixed Recovery Charges—The Financing Order Establishes the Methodology used to Calculate the Fixed Recovery Charges” and “The Servicing Agreement—The True-Up Adjustment Letters” in this prospectus.

Inaccurate forecasting of electricity consumption by the servicer might result from, among other things:

Inaccurate forecasting of delinquencies or write-offs by the servicer could result from, among other things:

- 28 -

The COVID-19 pandemic may impact SCE’s ability to collect and service the fixed recovery charges and might reduce scheduled payments on the bonds

In response to the global pandemic caused by COVID-19, many states and public utility commissions have enacted policies that limit the ability of utilities to disconnect customers for nonpayment. The California commission directed utilities to implement various consumer protection measures through September 30, 2021, including the cessation of all service disconnections, requiring deferred payment protections and the suspension of credit deposits. In addition, SCE voluntarily implemented certain consumer protection measures, such as the suspension of the assessment of late payment charges (LPCs). Please read “The Depositor, Seller, Initial Servicer and Sponsor—COVID-19 Customer Protections” in this prospectus. While most of these consumer protections have lapsed, comparable measures enacted in the future may limit the ability of SCE to collect all charges owed by customers, including the fixed recovery charges. In addition, the State legislature or the California commission may take additional actions in response to COVID-19 or any future pandemic which may adversely affect the timing of fixed recovery charge collections. As a consequence, there could be a shortfall or material delay in fixed recovery charge collections, which might result in missed or delayed payments of principal and interest and lengthened weighted average lives of the bonds and downgrade of the credit ratings on the bonds.

In addition, COVID-19 may impact the ability of SCE to maintain operations at the same level as it was able prior to the pandemic. For instance, a large portion of SCE’s workforce, including employees of their contractors, may be unable to perform their job functions effectively due to illness, family illness, quarantine requirements, social-distancing, telework requirements and other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Such potential impacts may limit the ability SCE to service the fixed recovery charges.

Your investment in the bonds depends on SCE or its successor or assignee, acting as servicer of the recovery property

SCE, as servicer, will be responsible for, among other things, calculating, billing and collecting the fixed recovery charges from ESPs, submitting requests to the California commission to adjust these charges, monitoring the collateral for the bonds and taking certain actions in the event of non-payment by a customers. The trustee’s receipt of collections in respect of the fixed recovery charges, which will be used to make payments on bonds, will depend in part on the skill and diligence of the servicer in performing these functions. The systems that the servicer has in place for fixed recovery charge billings and collections, together with the CPUC regulations governing ESPs, might, in particular circumstances, cause the servicer to experience difficulty in performing these functions in a timely and completely accurate manner. If the servicer fails to make collections for any reason, then the servicer’s payments to the trustee in respect of the fixed recovery charges might be delayed or reduced. In that event, our payments on the bonds might be delayed or reduced.

If we replace SCE as the servicer, we may experience difficulties finding and using a replacement servicer

If SCE ceases to service the recovery property related to the bonds, it might be difficult to find a successor servicer. Also, any successor servicer might have less experience and ability than SCE and might experience difficulties in collecting fixed recovery charges and determining appropriate adjustments to the fixed recovery charges and billing and/or payment arrangements may change, resulting in delays or disruptions of collections. A successor servicer might not be willing to perform except for fees higher than those approved in the financing order and might charge fees that, while permitted under the financing order, are substantially higher than the fees paid to SCE as servicer. Although a true-up adjustment would be required to allow for the increase in fees, there could be a gap between the incurrence of those fees and the implementation of a true-up adjustment to adjust for that increase that might adversely affect distributions to bondholders. In the event of the commencement of a

- 29 -

case by or against the servicer under Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended, of the Bankruptcy Code, or similar laws, we and the trustee might be prevented from effecting a transfer of servicing due to operation of the Bankruptcy Code. Any of these factors might delay the timing of payments and reduce the value of your investment.

Changes to billing, collection and posting practices might reduce the value of your investment in the bonds

The financing order specifies the methodology for determining the amount of the fixed recovery charges we may impose. However, subject to any required California commission approval, the servicer may set its own billing, collection and posting arrangements with customers from whom it collects fixed recovery charges, provided that these arrangements comply with any applicable California commission customer safeguards and the provisions of the servicing agreement. For example, to recover part of an outstanding bill, the servicer may agree to extend a customer’s payment schedule, including the fixed recovery charges. Also, subject to any required California commission approval, the servicer may change billing, collection and posting practices, which might adversely impact the timing and amount of customer payments and might reduce fixed recovery charge collections, thereby limiting our ability to make scheduled payments on the bonds. Separately, the California commission might require changes to these practices. Any changes in billing, collection and posting practices or regulations might make it more difficult for the servicer to collect the fixed recovery charges and adversely affect the value of your investment in the bonds.

SCE’s systems and network infrastructure are targets for physical and cyber-attacks, intrusions or other catastrophic events that could result in their failure or reduced functionality and limit SCE’s ability to service the recovery property

SCE’s operations require the continuous availability of critical information technology systems, sensitive customer data and network infrastructure and information, all of which are targets for malicious actors. New cyber and physical threats arise as SCE moves from an analog to a digital electric grid. For example, SCE’s grid modernization efforts and the move to a network-connected grid increases the number of “threat surfaces” and potential vulnerabilities that an adversary can target. In addition, SCE depends on a wide array of vendors to provide it with services and equipment. Malicious actors may attack vendors to disrupt the services they provide to SCE, or to use those vendors as a cyber conduit to attack SCE. Additionally, the equipment and material provided by SCE’s vendors may contain cyber vulnerabilities.

SCE’s systems have been, and will likely continue to be, subjected to computer attacks of malicious codes, unauthorized access attempts, and other illicit activities, but to date, SCE has not experienced a material cybersecurity breach. Though SCE actively monitors developments in this area and is involved in various industry groups and government initiatives, no security measures can completely shield its systems and infrastructure from vulnerabilities to cyber-attacks, intrusions or other catastrophic events that could result in their failure or reduced functionality.

If SCE’s information technology and operational technology systems’ security measures were to be breached, or a critical system failure were to occur without timely recovery, SCE could be unable to fulfill critical business functions, such as delivery of electricity to customers and the ability to meter and bill customers all of which could materially affect SCE’s ability to bill and collect fixed recovery charges or otherwise service the recovery property.

It may be difficult to collect fixed recovery charges from other parties who bill retail customers

Under California’s “direct access” program, SCE faces competition in certain areas of its retail business from ESPs. Currently the direct access program is limited to 13,456.87 gigawatt hours of annual sales for SCE’s service area. However, as has been done previously in 2009 and 2018, the Legislature or the California commission could expand the direct access program at any time. Please read “The Depositor, Seller, Initial

- 30 -

Servicer and Sponsor—Community Choice Aggregation, Direct Access and Departing Load” in this prospectus. In respect of customers taking service from an ESP, SCE remains the transmission and distribution provider. The Wildfire Financing Law provides that the fixed recovery charges must be paid by all existing and future customers within SCE’s service territory as it existed on the date of the financing order. The financing order provides that customers with departing load must pay the fixed recovery charges on the departing load. Nevertheless, ESPs that elect to do their own billing will be responsible for billing the fixed recovery charges and any delay in the remittance of such fixed recovery charges may reduce the fixed recovery charge collections available to make payments on the bonds.

It might be difficult for successor servicers to collect the fixed recovery charges from SCE’s customers

Any successor servicer may bring an action against a customer for non-payment of the fixed recovery charge, but only a successor servicer that is a successor electric utility may terminate service for failure to pay the fixed recovery charges. A successor servicer that does not have the threat of termination of service available to enforce payment of the fixed recovery charge would need to rely on the successor electric utility to threaten to terminate service for nonpayment of other portions of monthly electric utility bills. This inability might reduce the value of your investment.

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNUSUAL NATURE OF THE RECOVERY PROPERTY

Foreclosure of the trustee’s lien on the recovery property for the bonds might not be practical, and acceleration of the bonds before maturity might have little practical effect

Under the Wildfire Financing Law and the indenture, the trustee or the bondholders have the right to foreclose or otherwise enforce the lien on the recovery property securing the bonds. However, in the event of foreclosure, there is likely to be a limited market, if any, for the recovery property. Therefore, foreclosure might not be a realistic or practical remedy. Moreover, although principal of the bonds will be due and payable upon acceleration of the bonds before maturity, fixed recovery charges likely would not be accelerated and the nature of our business will result in principal of the bonds being paid as funds become available. If there is an acceleration of the bonds, all tranches of the bonds will be paid pro rata; therefore, some tranches might be paid earlier than expected and some tranches might be paid later than expected.

NATURAL DISASTER-RELATED RISK

Damage to SCE’s operations or reduced capacity to deliver electricity could impair payment of the bonds

SCE’s operations could be impacted by severe weather, earthquakes, and wildfires. Specifically, prolonged drought conditions and shifting weather patterns in California resulting from climate change as well as increased tree mortality rates have increased the duration of the wildfire season and the risk of severe wildfire events. Transmission and/or distribution and generation facilities could be damaged or destroyed and usage of electricity could be interrupted temporarily, reducing the collections of fixed recovery charges or otherwise impacting SCE’s ability to service the recovery property. There could be longer-lasting weather-related adverse effects on residential and commercial development and economic activity among SCE’s customers, which could cause the fixed recovery charges to be greater than expected. In addition, heat waves and other extreme weather events may require the implementation of rolling blackouts, temporarily reducing electricity sales and resulting in reduced fixed recovery charge collections. Legislative action adverse to the bondholders might be taken in response, and such legislation, if challenged as a violation of the State pledge, might be defended on the basis of public necessity. Please read “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with Potential Judicial, Legislative or Regulatory Actions—Future state legislative action, including a voter initiative, might attempt to reduce the value of your investment in the bonds” in this prospectus.

- 31 -

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH POTENTIAL BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS OF THE SELLER OR THE SERVICER

For a more detailed discussion of the following bankruptcy risks, please read “How a Bankruptcy May Affect Your Investment” in this prospectus.

The servicer will commingle the fixed recovery charges with other revenues it collects, which might obstruct access to the fixed recovery charges in case of the servicer’s bankruptcy and reduce the value of your investment in the bonds

The servicer will be required to remit estimated fixed recovery charge collections to the trustee no later than the second servicer business day of receipt. The servicer will not segregate the fixed recovery charges from the other funds it collects from customers or ESPs or its general funds. The fixed recovery charges will be estimated and segregated only when the servicer pays them to the trustee.

Despite this requirement, the servicer might fail to pay the full amount of the fixed recovery charges payable to the trustee or might fail to do so on a timely basis. This failure, whether voluntary or involuntary, might materially reduce the amount of fixed recovery charge collections available to make payments on the bonds.

Absent a default under the servicing agreement, SCE will be permitted to remit estimated fixed recovery charges to the trustee. While SCE will be responsible for identifying and calculating the actual amount of fixed recovery charges in the event of a default under the servicing agreement, it may be difficult for SCE to identify such charges, given existing limitations in its billing system.

The Wildfire Financing Law provides that the priority of a lien and security interest perfected in recovery property is not impaired by the commingling of the funds arising from fixed recovery charges with any other funds. In a bankruptcy of the servicer, however, a bankruptcy court might rule that federal bankruptcy law takes precedence over the Wildfire Financing Law and might decline to recognize our right to collections of the fixed recovery charges that are commingled with other funds of the servicer as of the date of bankruptcy. If so, the collections of the fixed recovery charges held by the servicer as of the date of bankruptcy would not be available to pay amounts owing on the bonds. In this case, we would have only a general unsecured claim against the servicer for those amounts. This decision could cause material delays in payments of principal or interest, or losses, on your bonds and could materially reduce the value of your investment in the bonds.

The bankruptcy of SCE or any successor seller might result in losses or delays in payments on the bonds

The seller will represent and warrant in the sale agreement that the transfer of the recovery property to us under that sale agreement is a valid sale and assignment of that recovery property from the seller to us. The seller will also represent, warrant, and covenant that it will take the appropriate actions under the Wildfire Financing Law to perfect this sale. The Wildfire Financing Law provides that the transactions described in the sale agreement shall constitute a sale of the recovery property to us, and the seller and we will treat the transaction as a sale under applicable law, although for financial reporting and tax reporting purposes the transaction will be treated as debt of the seller. If the seller were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, and a party in interest (including the seller itself) were to take the position that the sale of the recovery property to us should be recharacterized as the grant of a security interest in such recovery property to secure a borrowing of the seller, delays in payments on the bonds could result. If a court were to adopt such position, then delays or reductions in payments on the bonds could result.

Pursuant to the Wildfire Financing Law and the financing order, upon the sale of the recovery property, the recovery property is created as a current property right, and it thereafter continuously exists as property for all purposes. Nonetheless, if the seller were to become the debtor in a bankruptcy case, a party in interest (including the seller itself) may take the position that, because the fixed recovery charges are usage-based charges, recovery

- 32 -

property comes into existence only as customers use electricity. If a court were to adopt this position, no assurance can be given that the court would not also rule that any recovery property relating to electricity consumed after the commencement of the seller’s bankruptcy case was not required to be transferred to us, thus resulting in delays or reductions of payments on the bonds.

A bankruptcy court generally follows state property law on issues such as those addressed by the state law provisions described above. However, a bankruptcy court does not follow state law if it determines that the state law is contrary to a paramount federal bankruptcy policy or interest. If a bankruptcy court in a SCE bankruptcy refused to enforce one or more of the state property law provisions described above, the effect of this decision on you as a beneficial owner of the bonds might be similar to the treatment you would receive in a SCE bankruptcy if the bonds had been issued directly by SCE. A decision by the bankruptcy court that, despite our separateness from SCE, our assets and liabilities and those of SCE should be consolidated would have a similar effect on you as a bondholder.

We have taken steps together with SCE, as the seller, to reduce the risk that in the event the seller or an affiliate of the seller were to become the debtor in a bankruptcy case, a court would order that our assets and liabilities be substantively consolidated with those of SCE or an affiliate. Nonetheless, these steps might not be completely effective, and thus if SCE or an affiliate of the seller were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, a court might order that our assets and liabilities be consolidated with those of SCE or an affiliate of the seller. This might cause material delays in payment of, or losses on, your bonds and might materially reduce the value of your investment in the bonds. For example:

Furthermore, if SCE enters bankruptcy proceedings, it might be permitted to stop acting as servicer, and it may be difficult to find a third party to act as servicer. The failure of the servicer to perform its duties or the inability to find a successor servicer might cause payment delays or losses on your investment in the bonds. Also, the mere fact of a servicer or seller bankruptcy proceeding might have an adverse effect on the resale market for the bonds and on the value of the bonds.

- 33 -

The sale of the recovery property might be construed as a financing and not a sale in a case of SCE’s bankruptcy which might delay or limit payments on the bonds

The Wildfire Financing Law provides that the characterization of a transfer of recovery property as a sale or other absolute transfer will not be affected or impaired by treatment of the transfer as a financing for federal or state tax purposes or financial reporting purposes. We and SCE will treat the transaction as a sale under applicable law, although for financial reporting and income and franchise tax purposes the transaction is intended to be treated as a financing. In the event of a bankruptcy of SCE, a party in interest in the bankruptcy might assert that the sale of the recovery property to us was a financing transaction and not a “sale or other absolute transfer” and that the treatment of the transaction for financial reporting and tax purposes as a financing and not a sale lends weight to that position. If a court were to characterize the transaction as a financing, we expect that we would, on behalf of ourselves and the trustee, be treated as a secured creditor of SCE in the bankruptcy proceedings, although a court might determine that we only have an unsecured claim against SCE. Even if we had a security interest in the recovery property, we would not likely have access to the related fixed recovery charge collections during the bankruptcy and would be subject to the risks of a secured creditor in a bankruptcy case, including the possible bankruptcy risks described in the immediately preceding risk factor. As a result, repayment of the bonds might be significantly delayed and a plan of reorganization in the bankruptcy might permanently modify the amount and timing of payments to us of the related fixed recovery charge collections and therefore the amount and timing of funds available to us to pay bondholders.

If the servicer enters bankruptcy proceedings, the collections of the fixed recovery charges held by the servicer as of the date of bankruptcy might constitute preferences, which means these funds might be unavailable to pay amounts owing on the bonds

In the event of a bankruptcy of the servicer, a party in interest might take the position that the remittance of funds prior to bankruptcy of the servicer, pursuant to the servicing agreement, constitutes a preference under bankruptcy law if the remittance of those funds was deemed to be paid on account of a preexisting debt. If a court were to hold that the remittance of funds constitutes a preference, any such remittance within 90 days of the filing of the bankruptcy petition could be avoidable, and the funds could be required to be returned to the bankruptcy estate of the servicer. To the extent that fixed recovery charges have been commingled with the general funds of the servicer, the risk that a court would hold that a remittance of funds was a preference would increase. Also, we or the servicer may be considered an “insider” with any ESP that is affiliated with us or the servicer. If the servicer or we are considered to be an “insider” of the ESP, any such remittance made within one year of the filing of the bankruptcy petition could be avoidable as well if the court were to hold that such remittance constitutes a preference. In either case, we or the trustee would merely be an unsecured creditor of the servicer. If any funds were required to be returned to the bankruptcy estate of the servicer, we would expect that the amount of any future fixed recovery charges would be increased through the statutory true-up mechanism to recover such amount, though this would not eliminate the risk of payment delays or losses on your investment in the bonds.

Claims against SCE or any successor seller might be limited in the event of a bankruptcy of the seller

If the seller were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, claims, including indemnity claims, by us against the seller under the sale agreement and the other documents executed in connection with the sale agreement would be unsecured claims and would be adjudicated in the bankruptcy case. In addition, the bankruptcy court might estimate any contingent claims that we have against the seller and, if it determines that the contingency giving rise to these claims is unlikely to occur, estimate the claims at a lower amount. A party in interest in the bankruptcy of the seller might challenge the enforceability of the indemnity provisions in a sale agreement. If a court were to hold that the indemnity provisions were unenforceable, we would be left with a claim for actual damages against the seller based on breach of contract principles, which would be subject to estimation and/or calculation by the court. We cannot give any assurance as to the result if any of the above-described actions or claims were made. Furthermore, we cannot give any assurance as to what percentage of their claims, if any, unsecured creditors would receive in any bankruptcy proceeding involving the seller.

- 34 -

The bankruptcy of SCE or any successor seller might limit the remedies available to the trustee

Upon an event of default for the bonds under the indenture, the Wildfire Financing Law permits the trustee to enforce the security interest in the recovery property, as well as the statutory lien created by the Wildfire Financing Law in the recovery property, in accordance with the terms of the indenture. In this capacity, and pursuant to the Wildfire Financing Law and the financing order, the trustee is permitted to request the California commission to order the sequestration and payment to bondholders of all revenues arising with respect to the related recovery property. There can be no assurance, however, that the California commission or a court would issue this order, or that a court would respect the California commission’s right to order sequestration, after a SCE bankruptcy in light of the automatic stay provisions of Section 362 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. In that event, the trustee would be required to seek an order from the bankruptcy court lifting the automatic stay to permit this action by the California commission or a court, and an order requiring an accounting and segregation of the revenues arising from the recovery property. There can be no assurance that a court would grant either order.

OTHER RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH AN INVESTMENT IN THE BONDS

SCE’s indemnification obligations under the sale and servicing agreements are limited and might not be sufficient to protect your investment in the bonds

SCE is obligated under the sale agreement to indemnify us and the trustee, for itself and on behalf of the bondholders, only in specified circumstances and will not be obligated to repurchase any recovery property in the event of a breach of any of its representations, warranties or covenants regarding the recovery property. Similarly, SCE is obligated under the servicing agreement to indemnify us and the trustee, for itself and on behalf of the bondholders, only in specified circumstances. Please read “The Sale Agreement” and “The Servicing Agreement” in this prospectus.

Neither the trustee nor the bondholders will have the right to accelerate payments on the bonds as a result of a breach under the sale agreement or servicing agreement, absent an event of default under the indenture relating to the bonds as described under “Description of the Bonds—Events of Default; Rights Upon Event of Default” in this prospectus. Furthermore, SCE might not have sufficient funds available to satisfy its indemnification obligations under these agreements, and the amount of any indemnification paid by SCE might not be sufficient for you to recover all of your investment in the bonds. In addition, if SCE becomes obligated to indemnify bondholders, the then-current ratings on the bonds will likely be downgraded as a result of the circumstances causing the breach and the fact that bondholders will be unsecured creditors of SCE with respect to any of these indemnification amounts. SCE will not indemnify any person for any loss, damages, liability, obligation, claim, action, suit or payment resulting solely from a downgrade in the ratings on the bonds, or for any consequential damages, including any loss of market value of the bonds resulting from a default or a downgrade of the ratings of the bonds. Please read “The Sale Agreement—Seller Representations and Warranties” and “The Sale Agreement—Indemnification” in this prospectus.

We are issuing several tranches of the bonds

The financing order authorizes us to issue one or more tranches of the bonds not to exceed the Authorized Amount. Fixed recovery charges collected by or for the benefit of SCE will be allocated among the tranches of bonds as set forth in the expected sinking fund schedule and the priority of payments set forth under “Security for the Bonds—How Funds in the Collection Account Will Be Allocated” in this prospectus. However, we cannot assure you that the existence of multiple tranches of bonds would not cause reductions or delays in payment on your bonds. In addition, some matters relating to the bonds may require the vote of the holders of all tranches of the bonds. Your interests in these votes might conflict with the interests of the beneficial owners of bonds of another tranche and therefore these votes could result in an outcome that is materially unfavorable to you.

- 35 -

The credit ratings are no indication of the expected rate of payment of principal on the bonds

We expect the bonds will receive credit ratings from at least two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSRO). A rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold the bonds. The ratings merely analyze the probability that we will repay the total principal amount of the bonds at the final maturity date (which is later than the scheduled final payment date) and will make timely interest payments. The ratings are not an indication that the rating agencies believe that principal payments are likely to be paid on time according to the expected sinking fund schedule.

Under Rule 17g-5 of the Exchange Act, NRSROs providing the sponsor with the requisite certification will have access to all information posted on a website by the sponsor for the purpose of determining the initial rating and monitoring the rating after the closing date in respect of the bonds. As a result, an NRSRO other than the NRSRO hired by the sponsor (the hired NRSRO) may issue ratings on the bonds (unsolicited ratings), which may be lower, and could be significantly lower, than the ratings assigned by the hired NRSROs. The unsolicited ratings may be issued prior to, or after, the closing date in respect of the bonds. Issuance of any unsolicited rating will not affect the issuance of the bonds. Issuance of an unsolicited rating lower than the ratings assigned by the hired NRSRO on the bonds might adversely affect the value of the bonds and, for regulated entities, could affect the status of the bonds as a legal investment or the capital treatment of the bonds. Investors in the bonds should consult with their legal counsel regarding the effect of the issuance of a rating by a non-hired NRSRO that is lower than the rating of a hired NRSRO. None of SCE, us, the underwriters or any of their affiliates will have any obligation to inform you of any unsolicited ratings assigned after the date of this prospectus. In addition, if we or SCE fail to make available to a non-hired NRSRO any information provided to any hired rating agency for the purpose of assigning or monitoring the ratings on the bonds, a hired NRSRO could withdraw its ratings on the bonds, which could adversely affect the market value of your bonds and/or limit your ability to resell your bonds.

The bonds’ credit ratings might affect the market value of your bonds

A downgrading of the credit ratings of the bonds might have an adverse effect on the market value of the bonds. Credit ratings might change at any time and an NRSRO has the authority to revise or withdraw its rating based solely upon its own judgment. In addition, any downgrade in the credit ratings of the bonds may result in the bonds becoming ineligible to be held by certain funds or investors, which may require such investors to liquidate their investment in the bonds and result in lower prices and a less liquid trading market for the bonds.

The absence of a secondary market for the bonds might limit your ability to resell your bonds

The underwriters for the bonds might assist in resales of the bonds, but they are not required to do so. A secondary market for the bonds might not develop, and we do not expect to list the bonds on any securities exchange. If a secondary market does develop, it might not continue to exist or it might not be sufficiently liquid to allow you to resell any of your bonds. Please read “Plan of Distribution” in this prospectus.

You might receive principal payments for the bonds later than you expect

The amount and the rate of collection of the fixed recovery charges for the bonds, together with the related fixed recovery charge adjustments, will generally determine whether there is a delay in the scheduled repayments of bond principal. If the servicer collects the fixed recovery charges at a slower rate than expected from any ESP, it might have to request adjustments of the fixed recovery charges. If those adjustments are not timely and accurate, you might experience a delay in payments of principal and interest and a decrease in the value of your investment in the bonds.

- 36 -

SCE intends to cause the issuance, by us or other affiliated entities, of additional recovery bonds or other bonds secured by additional recovery property or other property that includes a nonbypassable charge on customers, which may cause a delay in the payment of the bonds and potential conflicts of interest among bondholders

On February 24, 2021, we issued $337,783,000 Senior Secured Recovery Bonds, Series 2021-A, herein referred to as the Series 2021-A Bonds. As noted, SCE intends to recover additional recovery costs through the issuance of additional recovery bonds by us or by another affiliated entity. In its application for the financing order, SCE stated its intention to seek additional financing orders from the California commission under the Wildfire Financing Law to approve the recovery of approximately an additional $721 million of recovery costs through the issuance of additional recovery bonds.

We may, at our sole discretion, but subject to conditions set forth in our organizational documents and the indenture, acquire additional recovery property created under a separate financing order, and issue a series of additional recovery bonds supported by such additional recovery property without your prior review or approval. Please read “Description of the Bonds—Conditions of Issuance of Additional Recovery Bonds” and “Security for the Bonds—Issuance of Additional Recovery Bonds”. In addition, SCE may in its sole discretion sell recovery property or property similar to recovery property (including recovery property relating to the recovery of COVID-19 costs as described below), created by a separate financing order to one or more entities other than us in connection with the issuance of additional recovery bonds or obligations similar to the bonds without your prior review or approval.

Any new issuance may include terms and provisions that would be unique to that particular issuance. SCE has covenanted in the sale agreement that the satisfaction of the rating agency condition and the execution and delivery of an intercreditor agreement are condition precedents to the sale of additional recovery property or similar property consisting of nonbypassable charges payable by customers comparable to the recovery property to another entity. Please read “Security for the Bonds—Intercreditor Agreement” and “Sale Agreement—Covenants of the Seller” in this prospectus.

In the event a customer does not pay in full all amounts owed under any bill, including fixed recovery charges, SCE, as servicer, is required to allocate any resulting shortfalls in fixed recovery charges ratably based on the amounts of fixed recovery charges owing in respect of the bonds, the Series 2021-A Bonds, and amounts owing in respect of additional recovery bonds. However, if a dispute arises with respect to the allocation of such fixed recovery charges or other delays occur on account of the administrative burdens of making such allocation, we cannot assure you that any new issuance would not cause reductions or delays in payment of your bonds.

In addition, actions taken by the holders of the Series 2021-A Bonds or one or more series of additional recovery bonds and additional other bonds might conflict with the interests of the beneficial owners of the bonds, and could result in an outcome that is materially unfavorable to you.

Regulatory provisions affecting certain investors could adversely affect the liquidity of the bonds

European Union (EU) legislation comprising Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of 12 December 2017 (as amended, the EU Securitization Regulation) together with any guidance published in relation thereto by the European Banking Authority, the European Securities and Markets Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority or the European Commission and any relevant regulatory and/or implementing technical standards adopted by the European Commission in relation thereto or to precedent legislation (together, the European Securitization Rules) imposes certain restrictions and obligations with regard to securitisations (as such term is defined for purposes of the EU Securitization Regulation). The European Securitization Rules are in force throughout the EU in respect of securitisations the securities of which were issued (or the securitisation positions of which were created) on or after January 1, 2019.

Pursuant to Article 5 of the European Securitization Rules, EU Institutional Investors, prior to investing in, (or otherwise holding an exposure to) a securitisation (as so defined) other than the originator, sponsor or original

- 37 -

lender (each as defined in the EU Securitization Regulation), must, amongst other things, (a) where the originator or original lender is established in a third country (that is, not within the EU or the EEA), verify that the originator or original lender grants all the credits giving rise to the underlying exposures on the basis of sound and well-defined criteria and clearly established processes for approving, amending, renewing and financing those credits and has effective systems in place to apply those criteria and processes to ensure that credit-granting is based on a thorough assessment of the obligor’s creditworthiness, (b) verify that the originator, sponsor or original lender retains on an ongoing basis a material net economic interest which, in any event, shall not be less than 5% in the securitisation, determined in accordance with Article 6 of the EU Securitization Regulation, and discloses that risk retention to such EU Institutional Investors in accordance with Article 7 of the EU Securitization Regulation, and (c) verify that the originator, sponsor or relevant securitisation special purpose entity (SSPE) has, where applicable, made available information as required by Article 7 of the EU Securitization Regulation in accordance with the frequency and modalities provided for in that Article (which sets out transparency requirements for originators, sponsors and SSPEs), and (d) carry out a due-diligence assessment which enables the institutional investor to assess the risks involved, considering at least (i) the risk characteristics of the securitisation position and the underlying exposures, and (ii) all the structural features of the securitisation that can materially impact the performance of the securitisation position.

EU Institutional Investors include: (a) insurance undertakings and reinsurance undertakings as defined in Directive 2009/138/EC, as amended; (b) institutions for occupational retirement provision falling within the scope of Directive (EU) 2016/2341 (subject to certain exceptions), and certain investment managers and authorized entities appointed by such institutions; (c) alternative investment fund managers as defined in Directive 2011/61/EU which manage and/or market alternative investment funds in the EU; (d) certain internally-managed investment companies authorized in accordance with Directive 2009/65/EC, and managing companies as defined in that Directive; (e) credit institutions as defined in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR) (and certain consolidated affiliates thereof); and (f) investment firms as defined in CRR (and certain consolidated affiliates thereof).

With respect to the United Kingdom (UK), relevant UK established or UK regulated persons (as described below) are subject to the restrictions and obligations of the EU Securitization Regulation directly applicable in the UK adopted as part of UK domestic law by operation of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 as amended by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2020 (as amended, the EUWA), and as amended by the Securitisation (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (together with the EUWA, the EU Exit Regulations), (the UK Securitization Regulation) and as further amended from time to time.

The UK Securitization Regulation, together with (a) all applicable binding secondary legislation, technical standards or implementing technical standards made under the UK Securitization Regulation (in each case, as amended, varied or substituted from time to time), (b) any EU regulatory technical standards or implementing technical standards relating to the EU Securitization Regulation (including such regulatory technical standards or implementing technical standards) that are applicable and binding in the UK pursuant to EU Exit Regulations and subject to any transitional directions from the Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA), (c) all relevant guidance, policy statements or directions relating to the application of the UK Securitization Regulation (or any binding technical standards) published by the FCA, the Bank of England, the UK pensions regulator (the Pensions Regulator) and/or the Prudential Regulation Authority (the PRA) or any other UK regulator (or their successors), (d), any other transitional direction and any transitional relief of the FCA, the Bank of England, the PRA, the Pensions Regulator (or their successors) and (e) any other applicable laws, acts, statutory instruments, rules, guidance or policy statements published or enacted relating to the UK Securitization Regulation, in each case, as may be further amended, supplemented or replaced, from time to time, are referred to in this prospectus as the UK Securitization Rules.

Article 5 of the UK Securitization Regulation places certain conditions on investments in a “securitisation” (as defined in the UK Securitization Regulation) by a UK Institutional Investor. UK Institutional Investors include: (a) an insurance undertaking as defined in section 417(1) of the Financial Services And Markets Act

- 38 -

2000 (as amended, the FSMA); (b) a reinsurance undertaking as defined in section 417(1) of the FSMA; (c) an occupational pension scheme as defined in section 1(1) of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 that has its main administration in the UK, or a fund manager of such a scheme appointed under section 34(2) of the Pensions Act 1995 that, in respect of activity undertaken pursuant to that appointment, is authorized for the purposes of section 31 of the FSMA; (d) an alternative investment fund manager as defined in regulation 4(1) of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulation 2013 that markets or manages alternative investments funds (as defined in regulation 3 of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulation 2013) in the UK; (e) a management company as defined in section 237(2) of the FSMA; (f) an undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities as defined by section 236A of the FSMA, which is an authorized open ended investment company as defined in section 237(3) of the FSMA; and (g) a CRR firm as defined in Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of the EU Exit Regulations (and certain consolidated affiliates thereof).

Prior to investing in (or otherwise holding an exposure to) a “securitisation position” (as defined in the UK Securitization Regulation), a UK Institutional Investor, other than the originator, sponsor or original lender (each as defined in the UK Securitization Regulation), must, among other things: (a) verify that, where the originator or original lender is established in a third country (i.e. not within the UK), the originator or original lender grants all the credits giving rise to the underlying exposures on the basis of sound and well-defined criteria and clearly established processes for approving, amending, renewing and financing those credits and has effective systems in place to apply those criteria and processes to ensure that credit-granting is based on a thorough assessment of the obligor’s creditworthiness; (b) verify that, if established in the third country (i.e. not within the UK), the originator, sponsor or original lender retains on an ongoing basis a material net economic interest that, in any event, shall not be less than 5%, determined in accordance with Article 6 of the UK Securitization Regulation, and discloses the risk retention to the affected UK Institutional Investors; (c) verify that, where established in a third country (i.e. not within the UK), the originator, sponsor or relevant securitisation special purpose entity, where applicable, made available information that is substantially the same as that which it would have made available under Article 7 of the UK Securitization Regulation (which sets out certain transparency requirements) if it had been established in the UK and has done so with such frequency and modalities as are substantially the same as those with which it would have made information available if it had been established in the UK; and (d) carry out a due-diligence assessment that enables the UK Institutional Investor to assess the risks involved, considering at least (i) the risk characteristics of the securitisation position and the underlying exposures and (ii) all the structural features of the securitisation that can materially impact the performance of the securitisation position.

The issuing entity and SCE do not believe that the bonds fall within the definition of a “securitisation” for purposes of the EU Securitization Regulation or the UK Securitization Regulation as there is no tranching of credit risk associated with exposures under the transactions described in this prospectus.

Therefore, the issuing entity and SCE believe such transactions are not subject to the European Securitization Rules or the UK Securitization Rules. As such, neither the issuing entity nor SCE, nor any other party to the transactions described in this prospectus, intend, or are required under the transaction documents, to retain a material net economic interest in respect of such transactions, or to take, or to refrain from taking, any other action, in a manner prescribed or contemplated by the European Securitization Rules or the UK Securitization Rules. In particular, no such Person undertakes to take, or to refrain from taking, any action for purposes of compliance by any investor (or any other Person) with any requirement of the European Securitization Rules or the UK Securitization Rules to which such investor (or other Person) may be subject at any time. However, if a competent authority were to take a contrary view and determine that the transactions described in this prospectus do constitute a securitisation for purposes of the EU Securitization Regulation or the UK Securitization Regulation, then any failure by an EU Institutional Investor or a UK Institutional Investor (as applicable) to comply with any applicable European Securitization Rules or UK Securitization Rules (as applicable) with respect to an investment in the bonds may result in the imposition of a penalty regulatory capital charge on that investment or of other regulatory sanctions and remedial measures.

- 39 -

Consequently, the bonds may not be a suitable investment for EU Institutional Investors or UK Institutional Investors. As a result, the price and liquidity of the bonds in the secondary market may be adversely affected.

Prospective investors are responsible for analyzing their own legal and regulatory position and are advised to consult with their own advisors and any relevant regulator or other authority regarding the scope, applicability and compliance requirements of the European Securitization Rules and the UK Securitization Rules, and the suitability of the recovery bonds for investment. Neither the issuing entity nor SCE, nor any other party to the transactions described in this prospectus, make any representation as to any such matter, or have any liability to any investor (or any other Person) for any non-compliance by any such Person with the European Securitization Rules, the UK Securitization Rules or any other applicable legal, regulatory or other requirements.

If the investment of collected fixed recovery charges and other funds held by the trustee in the collection account results in investment losses or the investments become illiquid, you may receive payment of principal and interest on the bonds later than you expect

Funds held by the trustee in the collection account will be invested in eligible investments at the written direction of the servicer. Eligible investments include money market funds having a rating from Moody’s and S&P of “Aaa” and “AAA,” respectively. Although investments in these money market funds have traditionally been viewed as highly liquid with a low probability of principal loss, illiquidity and principal losses have been experienced by investors in certain of these funds as a result of disruptions in the financial markets in recent years. If investment losses or illiquidity is experienced, you might experience a delay in payments of principal and interest and a decrease in the value of your investment in the bonds.

There can be no assurance that the projects funded with the proceeds from the sale of the recovery property will meet investor criteria and expectations regarding environmental or social impact and sustainability performance.

SCE intends to allocate the ultimate proceeds received from the sale of the recovery property to reimburse itself for previously incurred recovery costs related to Eligible Projects (as defined herein), which consist of certain wildfire risk mitigation capital expenditures eligible for recovery under the Wildfire Financing Law that have been incurred by SCE from the period beginning August 1, 2019 through May 31, 2021. Any information that SCE or the issuing entity provides concerning the environmental or social impacts of the Eligible Projects will be estimates determined by their management to the best of their ability based on the information available to them at such time. The determinations giving rise to such impact information are inherently imprecise and should not be taken as statements of fact. Furthermore, the underwriters are not responsible for assessing or verifying whether the Eligible Projects meet the prescribed eligibility criteria or for the monitoring of the use of proceeds. Neither the terms of the bonds, the indenture relating to the bonds, nor the sale agreement pursuant to which the recovery property will be sold to the issuing entity by SCE require SCE or the issuing entity to use the proceeds for Eligible Projects as described under “Use of Proceeds” and any failure by SCE or the issuing entity to comply with the anticipated use of proceeds will not constitute a breach of or an event of default under the bonds or the indenture relating to the bonds.

Prospective investors should carefully review the information set out in this prospectus regarding such use of the proceeds from the sale of the recovery property and must determine for themselves the relevance of such information for the purpose of any investment in the bonds together with any other investigation such investor deems necessary. In particular, no assurance is given by us or any underwriter that the use of such proceeds from the sale of the recovery property to fund any Eligible Projects will satisfy (or will continue to satisfy), whether in whole or in part, any present or future investor expectations or requirements, taxonomies or standards or other investment criteria or guidelines with which such investor or its investments are required to comply, whether by any present or future applicable laws or regulations or by its own by-laws or other governing rules or investment

- 40 -

portfolio mandates, ratings mandates or other independent expectations, in particular with regard to any direct or indirect environmental, sustainability or social impact of any projects or uses, the subject of or related to, any Eligible Projects. Any failure by SCE or the issuing entity to allocate the proceeds from the sale of the recovery property to refinance previously incurred recovery costs related to one or more Eligible Projects or the failure of those investments or financings to satisfy investor expectations or requirements could have a material adverse effect on the market price of the bonds.

There is no legal, regulatory or market definition of or standardized criteria for what constitutes a “green,” “social,” “sustainable” or other equivalently labeled project, and any such designations made by third parties with respect to the bonds may not be suitable for the investment criteria of an investor.

There is currently no clearly defined definition (legal, regulatory or otherwise) of, nor market consensus as to what constitutes, a “green,” “social,” “sustainable” or an equivalently labeled project, or as to what precise attributes are required for a particular project to be defined as “green,” “social,” “sustainable” or such other equivalent label, and nor can any assurance be given that such a clear definition or consensus will develop over time. Accordingly, no assurance is or can be given to investors that the Eligible Projects will meet any or all investor expectations regarding such “green,” “social,” “sustainable” or other equivalently-labeled performance objectives, or that any adverse environmental, social and/or other impacts will not occur with respect to any Eligible Projects funded in whole or in part by the proceeds from the sale of the recovery property.

No assurance or representation is given as to the suitability or reliability for any purpose whatsoever of any opinion or certification of any third party (whether or not solicited by SCE or the issuing entity) that may be solicited in connection with the issuance of the bonds and, in particular, with respect to whether any Eligible Projects fulfill any environmental, social, sustainability and/or other criteria. For the avoidance of doubt, any such opinion or certification is not and shall not be deemed to be incorporated into and/or form part of this prospectus. Any such opinion or certification is not, nor should be deemed to be, a recommendation by the issuing entity, SCE or any underwriter, or any other person to buy, sell or hold the bonds. Any such opinion or certification is only current as of the date that opinion or certification was initially issued. Prospective investors must determine for themselves the relevance of any such opinion or certification and/or the information contained therein and/or the provider of such opinion or certification for the purpose of any investment in the bonds. Currently, the providers of such opinions and certifications are not subject to any specific regulatory or other regime or oversight. Any withdrawal of any such opinion or certification or any additional opinion or certification attesting that SCE or the issuing entity is not complying in whole or in part with any matters for which such opinion or certification is opining or certifying may have a material adverse effect on the value of the bonds and/or result in adverse consequences for certain investors with mandates to invest in securities to be used for a particular purpose.

While no assurance can be provided that any such listing will occur, in the event that the bonds are listed or admitted to trading on any dedicated “green,” “social,” “sustainable” or other equivalently-labeled segment of any stock exchange or securities market (whether or not regulated), no representation or assurance can be given that such listing or admission would satisfy, whether in whole or in part, any present or future investor expectations or requirements, or that any such listing or admission to trading will be maintained during the life of the bonds. In the event that the bonds are so listed, any change to the listing or admission status of the bonds may have a material adverse effect on the value of the bonds and/or result in adverse consequences for certain investors with portfolio mandates to invest in securities to be used for a particular purpose.

REVIEW OF RECOVERY PROPERTY

Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, SCE, as sponsor, has performed, as described below, a review of the recovery property underlying the bonds. As required by these rules, the review was designed and effected to provide reasonable assurance that disclosure regarding the recovery property is accurate in all material respects. SCE did not engage a third party in conducting its review.

- 41 -

The bonds will be secured under the indenture by the indenture’s trust estate. The principal asset of the indenture’s trust estate is the recovery property relating to the bonds. The recovery property includes the right to impose, bill, collect and receive nonbypassable, irrevocable fixed recovery charges in amounts necessary to pay principal on and interest of the bonds and other required amounts and charges owing in connection with the bonds, the right under the financing order to obtain true-up adjustments of fixed recovery charges under Wildfire Financing Law (with respect to adjustments, in the manner and with the effect provided in the servicing agreement) and all revenue, collections, claims, right to payments, payments, money and proceeds arising out of the rights and interests created under the financing order. Under the Wildfire Financing Law and the financing order, the fixed recovery charges are payable by any existing or future individual, governmental body, trust, business entity, or nonprofit organization located in the service territory of SCE as of the date of the financing order, except those customers enrolled in the CARE or FERA programs, that consumes electricity that has been transmitted or distributed by means of electric transmission or distribution facilities, whether those electric transmission or distribution facilities are owned by the customer, SCE, or any other party.

The recovery property is not a receivable, and the recovery property and other collateral held by the trustee securing the bonds do not constitute a pool of receivables. Fixed recovery charges that relate to the recovery property are irrevocable and not subject to reduction, impairment, postponement, termination or, except for the specified true-up adjustments to correct any overcollections or undercollections, adjustment by further action of the California commission. The rates at which fixed recovery charges are billed to customers will be adjusted to correct any overcollections or undercollections from prior periods. These adjustments are intended to ensure the recovery of revenues sufficient to retire the principal amount of the bonds in accordance with the expected sinking fund schedule, to pay all interest on the bonds when due, to pay fees and expenses of servicing the bonds and premiums, if any, associated with the bonds and to fund any required credit enhancement for the bonds. In addition to the annual true-up adjustments, the servicer is also required to implement (a) quarterly true-up adjustments if bonds are outstanding following the latest scheduled final payment date for such bonds, and (b) may request an interim true-up adjustment at any time for any reason to ensure timely payment of scheduled principal of and interest on the bonds and other required amounts and charges owing in connection with the bonds on the next payment date. There is no cap on the level of fixed recovery charges that may be imposed on customers as a result of the true-up adjustment process to pay principal of and interest on the bonds when due and other required amounts and charges owing in connection with the bonds. All revenues and collections resulting from fixed recovery charges provided for in the financing order are part of the recovery property. The recovery property relating to the bonds is described in more detail under “The Recovery Property and the Wildfire Financing Law” in this prospectus.

In the financing order, the California commission, among other things:

Please read “The Recovery Property and the Wildfire Financing Law” and “SCE’s Financing Order” in this prospectus for more information.

The characteristics of recovery property are unlike the characteristics of assets underlying mortgage and other commercial asset-based financings because recovery property is a creature of statute and state regulatory

- 42 -

commission proceedings. Because the nature and characteristics of recovery property and many elements of recovery bond financings are set forth in and constrained by the Wildfire Financing Law and the financing order, SCE, as sponsor, does not select the assets to be pledged as collateral in ways common to many traditional asset-based financings. Moreover, the bonds do not contain origination or underwriting elements similar to typical mortgage or other loan transactions involved in other forms of asset-backed securities. The Wildfire Financing Law and the financing order require the imposition on, and collection of fixed recovery charges from, existing and future customers and any other consumers of electricity within SCE’s service territory, subject to the exceptions. Please read “The Recovery Property and the Wildfire Financing Law—The Financing Order is Irrevocable—Exemptions from Fixed Recovery Charges” in this prospectus. Since the fixed recovery charges are assessed against all such customers and the true-up mechanism adjusts for the impact of consumer defaults, the collectability of the fixed recovery charges is not ultimately dependent upon the credit quality of particular SCE customers, as would be the case in the absence of the true-up adjustment.

The review by SCE of the recovery property underlying the bonds has involved a number of discrete steps and elements as described in more detail below. First, SCE has analyzed and applied the Wildfire Financing Law’s requirements for recovering recovery costs and approval of the California commission for the issuance of the financing order and in its proposal with respect to the characteristics of the recovery property to be created pursuant to the financing order. In preparing this proposal, SCE worked with its counsel and its structuring advisor in preparing the application for a financing order. Moreover, SCE worked with its counsel and the underwriters in preparing the legal agreements that provide for the terms of the bonds and the security for the bonds. SCE has analyzed economic issues and practical issues for the scheduled payment of principal of and interest on the bonds, including the impact of economic factors, potential for disruptions due to weather or catastrophic events, including the current COVID-19 pandemic, and its own forecasts for customer growth as well as the historical accuracy of its prior forecasts.

In light of the unique nature of the recovery property, SCE has taken (or prior to the offering of the bonds, will take) the following actions in connection with its review of the recovery property and the preparation of the disclosure for inclusion in this prospectus describing the recovery property, the bonds and the proposed securitization:

- 43 -

In connection with the preparation of such models, SCE:

As a result of this review, SCE has concluded that:

THE RECOVERY PROPERTY AND THE WILDFIRE FINANCING LAW

The Wildfire Financing Law Generally

The risk of catastrophic wildfires has been increasing in California for years, largely due to multiple factors, including the buildup of dry vegetation in areas severely impacted by years of historic drought, lack of adequate

- 44 -

clearing of hazardous fuels by responsible parties, higher temperatures and lower humidity. In 2017 and 2018, a number of catastrophic wildfires occurred in California that caused substantial damage to residential and business properties in the state and damaged the transmission and distribution infrastructure of SCE and other utilities. In addition, utility property was determined to be associated with the ignition of certain of these wildfires, and California law has held utilities strictly liable for property damage if the utilities’ facilities are a substantial cause of wildfires that caused the property damage.

In response to catastrophic wildfires which engulfed portions of the State of California in 2017 and 2018, the California legislature enacted a series of pieces of legislation, including SB 901 enacted in 2018, and AB 1054 and AB 1513 enacted in 2019 to address wildfire damage and the related financial impacts, including providing financial stability for the State of California’s electrical utilities. As part of such legislation, the California legislature amended the Public Utilities Code to enact the Wildfire Financing Law to allow for the recovery of recovery costs if the California commission deems such costs to be just and reasonable.

The Wildfire Financing Law permits electric corporations to collect recovery costs through the issuance of recovery bonds pursuant to and supported by an irrevocable financing order issued by the CPUC and permits the CPUC to impose an irrevocable, nonbypassable fixed recovery charge on existing and future customers located in the service territory of the electrical corporation as of the date of the financing order, subject to certain exceptions. Please read “ —Exemptions from Fixed Recovery Charges” below and “SCE’s Financing Order” in this prospectus. The Wildfire Financing Law authorized the fixed recovery charge to recover: (a) recovery costs equal to the principal amount of the recovery bonds and (b) costs of recovering, financing, or refinancing those recovery costs, including the costs of servicing and retiring the recovery bonds.

The Wildfire Financing Law provides that fixed recovery charges are nonbypassable, meaning that they are payable by any individual, governmental body, trust, business entity, or nonprofit organization, subject to the exceptions described below, that consumes electricity that has been transmitted or distributed by means of electric transmission or distribution facilities, whether those electric transmission or distribution facilities are owned by the consumer, the electrical corporation, or any other party. In addition, under the Wildfire Financing Law, fixed recovery charges may consist of distribution, connection, disconnection and termination rates and charges and other rates and charges authorized by a financing order.

The Financing Order and the Recovery Property

The Wildfire Financing Law contains a number of provisions designed to facilitate the securitization of recovery costs, including the following:

The Wildfire Financing Law Provides for the Creation of Recovery Property

The Wildfire Financing Law authorizes the California commission, through issuance of a financing order, to provide for the creation of recovery property to secure repayment of recovery bonds. Recovery property is defined under the Wildfire Financing Law to include, without limitation, the right, title, and interest of the electrical corporation or its transferee:

The Wildfire Financing Law provides that recovery property that is specified in a financing order shall constitute an existing, present property right, notwithstanding the fact that the imposition and collection of fixed recovery charges depend on the electrical corporation continuing to provide electricity service or continuing to

- 45 -

perform its servicing functions relating to the collection of fixed recovery charges or on the level of future electricity consumption. Recovery property shall exist whether or not the fixed recovery charges have been billed, have accrued, or have been collected and notwithstanding the fact that the value for a security interest in the recovery property, or amount of the recovery property, is dependent on the future provision of service to customers. All recovery property specified in a financing order shall continue to exist until the recovery bonds issued pursuant to a financing order and all associated financing costs are paid in full.

A Financing Order is Irrevocable

The Wildfire Financing Law provides that the financing order is irrevocable. In addition, under the Wildfire Financing Law, the California commission may not, either by rescinding, altering, or amending the financing order or otherwise, revalue or revise for ratemaking purposes the recovery costs or the costs of recovering, financing, or refinancing the recovery costs, in any way reduce or impair the value of recovery property either directly or indirectly by taking fixed recovery charges into account when setting other rates for the electrical corporation. Moreover, the amount of revenues generated by the fixed recovery charges shall not be subject to reduction, impairment, postponement, or termination.

Fixed Recovery Charges May Be Adjusted

The Wildfire Financing Law requires the California commission to provide, in any financing order, a procedure for periodic true-up adjustments to fixed recovery charges, which shall be made at least annually and may be made more frequently. The electrical corporation shall submit an application with the commission to implement any true-up adjustment. Please read “SCE’s Financing Order—Fixed Recovery Charges—The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically “True-Up” the Fixed Recovery Charge” and “The Servicing Agreement—True-Up Adjustment Letters” in this prospectus. The Wildfire Financing Law and the financing order do not impose a cap on the fixed recovery charge.

The Wildfire Financing Law Provides for the Creation of Consensual and Statutory Liens on Recovery Property

The Wildfire Financing Law provides that consensual security interests can be granted in recovery property and that a statutory lien will be established on recovery property upon the effective date of the financing order. With respect to consensual security interests, the Wildfire Financing Law provides that a valid and enforceable security interest in recovery property attaches when (a) the California commission has issued the financing order, (b) the pledgee of the recovery property (such as the trustee) has given value for the recovery property, and (c) the pledgor (such as us) has signed a security agreement covering the recovery property. The security interest in the recovery property is perfected when it has attached and when a financing statement has been filed with the California Secretary of State in accordance with the Wildfire Financing Law. A statutory lien on recovery property with respect to recovery bonds arises under the Wildfire Financing Law. This statutory lien arises automatically, without further action by the servicer, us or any other person. Under the financing order, a statutory lien will exist on the recovery property then existing or thereafter arising relating to recovery bonds and will secure all obligations, then existing or subsequently arising, to the holders of those recovery bonds and the indenture trustee for those holders. This statutory lien will be a first priority lien on all recovery property then in existence or that subsequently arises for that series of recovery bonds pursuant to the terms of the financing order.

Under the Wildfire Financing Law, if a default or termination occurs under the terms of the bonds, the pledgees of the recovery bonds (such as the trustee) are entitled to foreclose or otherwise enforce their security interest in the recovery property. In addition, the California commission may require in the financing order that, in the event of default by the electrical corporation in payment of recovery property revenues, the California commission and any successor thereto, upon the application by the pledgees or transferees (such as trustee or us), and without limiting any other remedies available to the pledgees or transferees by reason of the default, shall order the sequestration and payment to the pledgees or transferees of recovery property revenues. The Wildfire

- 46 -

Financing Law provides that any such order shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding any bankruptcy, reorganization, or other insolvency proceedings with respect to the debtor, pledgor, or transferor of the recovery property. Please read “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with the Unusual Nature of the Recovery Property—Foreclosure of the trustee’s lien on the recovery property for the bonds might not be practical, and acceleration of the bonds before maturity might have little practical effect” in this prospectus.

The Wildfire Financing Law Provides that the Transfer of Recovery Property is a True Sale

The Wildfire Financing Law provides that an electric corporation’s transfer of recovery property is a “true sale” and shall be treated as an absolute transfer of all of the transferor’s right, title, and interest, as in a true sale, and not as a pledge or other financing, of the recovery property, other than for federal and state income and franchise tax purposes. The transfer as a sale, assignment, or transfer as an absolute transfer and true sale true sale is not affected by:

Please read “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with Potential Bankruptcy Proceedings of the Seller and the Servicer” and “How A Bankruptcy May Affect Your Investment” in this prospectus.

The Wildfire Financing Law Requires the Electrical Corporation and its Successors to Service the Recovery Property

The Wildfire Financing Law requires the California commission to authorize the electrical corporation to enter into a servicing contract with the issuer of the recovery bonds (i.e., the issuing entity). This contract must require the electrical utility to continue to operate its system to provide service to consumers within its service territory, to collect amounts in respect of the fixed recovery charges for the benefit and account of the issuing entity and to account for and remit these amounts to or for the account of the issuing entity. The Wildfire Financing Law further provides to the extent that billing, collection, and other related services with respect to the provision of electric service are provided to a consumer by any person or entity other than the electrical corporation in whose service territory the consumer is located, that person or entity must collect the fixed recovery charges from the consumer for the benefit and account of the applicable issuing entity as a condition to the provision of electric service to that consumer.

The Wildfire Financing Law further provides that any successor to the electrical corporation, whether pursuant to any bankruptcy, reorganization, or other insolvency proceeding, or pursuant to any merger, sale, or transfer, by operation of law, or otherwise, must perform and satisfy all obligations of the electrical corporation under the Wildfire Financing Law in the same manner and to the same extent as the electrical corporation. Please read “The Servicing Agreement—Successor Servicer” in this prospectus.

- 47 -

State Pledge

Under the Wildfire Financing Law, the State of California has pledged, that it will neither limit nor alter the fixed recovery charges, recovery property, financing orders, or any rights thereunder, except for adjustments discussed above and in “SCE’s Financing Order—Fixed Recovery Charges—The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically “True-Up” the Fixed Recovery Charge” and “The Servicing Agreement—True-Up Adjustment Letters,” until the recovery bonds, together with the interest thereon, are fully paid and discharged. However, the Wildfire Financing Law further provides that nothing in the State pledge precludes the State of California from limiting or altering the fixed recovery charges, recovery property or any financing order of the California commission, if and when adequate provision is made by law for the protection of SCE, owners of recovery property and holders of recovery bonds.

Constitutional Matters

To date, no federal or California cases addressing the repeal or amendment of statutory provisions analogous to those contained in the Wildfire Financing Law have been decided. There have been cases in which courts have applied the Contract Clause of the United States constitution and the Contract Clause of the California constitution to strike down legislation regarding similar matters, such as legislation reducing or eliminating taxes, public charges or other sources of revenues servicing other types of bonds issued by public instrumentalities or private issuers (or issuing entities), or otherwise substantially impairing or eliminating the security for bonds or other indebtedness. Based upon this case law, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP expects to deliver a reasoned opinion, prior to the closing of the offering of the bonds to the effect that, a reviewing court of competent jurisdiction, in a properly prepared and presented case, would conclude that the State pledge constitutes a contractual relationship between the bondholders and the State of California, and that, absent a demonstration by the State of California that any legislative action by the State of California, whether by the State legislature or the voters pursuant to their initiative rights, which becomes law (such action being referred to as a legislative action) that limits, alters, impairs or reduces the value of the recovery property or the fixed recovery charges so as to impair (a) the terms of the indenture or the bonds or (b) the rights and remedies of the bondholders (or the trustee acting on their behalf) (each such act, an impairment), the bondholders could successfully challenge under the Federal Contract Clause or the California Contract Clause the constitutionality of any legislative action determined by such court to limit, alter, impair or reduce the value of the recovery property or the fixed recovery charges so as to cause an impairment prior to the time that the bonds are fully paid and discharged. The cases also indicate that the State’s justification would be subjected to a higher degree of scrutiny, and that the State would bear a more substantial burden, if the legislative action impairs a contract to which the State is a party (which we believe to be the case here), as contrasted to a contract solely between private parties. It may be possible for the California legislature to repeal or amend the Wildfire Financing Law or for the California commission to amend or revoke the financing order notwithstanding the State pledge, if the legislature or the California commission acts in order to serve a significant and legitimate public purpose, such as protecting the public health and safety or responding to a national or regional catastrophe affecting SCE, or if the legislature otherwise acts in the valid exercise of the state’s police power. We will file a copy of the Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP opinion as an exhibit to an amendment to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, or to one of our periodic filings with the SEC.

In addition, any legislative action adversely affecting the recovery property or the ability to collect fixed recovery charges may be considered a “taking” under the United States or California constitutions. Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP has advised us that it is not aware of any federal or California court cases addressing the applicability of the Takings Clause of the United States or California constitutions in a situation analogous to that which would be involved in an amendment or repeal of the Wildfire Financing Law. It is possible that a court would decline even to apply a Takings Clause analysis to a claim based on an amendment or repeal of the Wildfire Financing Law, since, for example, a court might determine that a Contract Clause analysis rather than a Takings Clause analysis should be applied. Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP expects to render a reasoned opinion, prior to the closing of the offering of the bonds, to the effect that under existing case law, assuming a Takings

- 48 -

Clause analysis were applied under the United States constitution or California constitution, the State of California would be required under either such constitution to pay just compensation to the bondholders if the State’s repeal or amendment of the Wildfire Financing Law or taking of any other action in contravention of the State pledge, (a) constituted a permanent appropriation of a substantial property interest of the bondholders in the recovery property or denied all economically productive use of the recovery property; (b) destroyed the recovery property other than in response to emergency conditions; or (c) substantially reduced, altered or impaired the value of the recovery property so as to unduly interfere with the reasonable expectations of the bondholders arising from their investments in the bonds, provided that the court might take a more expansive view of emergency conditions under the California Takings Clause, leading to correspondingly narrower restrictions on State action under the California Takings Clause than under the Federal Takings Clause. There is no assurance, however, that, even if a court were to award just compensation, it would be sufficient for you to recover fully your investment in the bonds.

In connection with the foregoing, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP has advised us that issues relating to the Contract and Takings Clauses of the United States and California constitutions are essentially decided on a case-by-case basis and that the courts’ determinations, in most cases, appear to be strongly influenced by the facts and circumstances of the particular case, and Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP has further advised us that there are no reported controlling judicial precedents that are directly on point. The opinions described above will be subject to the qualifications included in them. The degree of impairment necessary to meet the standards for relief under a Takings Clause analysis or Contract Clause analysis could be substantially in excess of what a bondholder would consider material.

For a discussion of risks associated with potential judicial, legislation or regulatory actions, please read “Risk Factors—Risks Associated with Potential Judicial, Legislative or Regulatory Actions” in this prospectus.

Exemptions from Fixed Recovery Charges

Under the Wildfire Financing Law, customers enrolled in the CARE or FERA programs are exempted from the payment of fixed recovery charges. See “SCE’s Financing Order” in this prospectus.

SCE’S FINANCING ORDER

SCE’s Financing Order

In June 2021, SCE filed an application with the California commission for a financing order seeking recovery of (a) $218.6 million of the recovery costs associated with a settlement approved by the California commission in April 2020 relating to fire risk mitigation capital expenditures expensed found just and reasonable by the California commission, (b) up to $299 million of the capital expenditures to be authorized in SCE’s current general rate case, (c) $401 million of wildfire-related operation and maintenance expenses included in a settlement in SCE’s current general rate case and (d) $77.7 million in COVID-related uncollectible expenses verified by the California commission, together with certain interim financing costs relating to these costs and financing costs relating to the issuance of the bonds (collectively, the Authorized Amount).

On October 21, 2021, the California commission issued its financing order which authorized SCE to cause to be issued bonds in an estimated aggregate principal amount of $535.832 million, equal to the sum of $517.581 million in recovery costs, plus an estimated $9.488 million in pre-financing costs and $8.753 million in bond-related financing costs relating to the issuance of the bonds. In the financing order, the Commission did not authorize the recovery of wildfire-related operation and maintenance expenses or COVID-related uncollectible expenses through the issuance of the bonds, and authorized recovery through other mechanisms. The final principal amount of the bonds will be subject to the approval of the California commission in the issuance advice letter described below. Please read “—Issuance Advice Letter” below.

- 49 -

The financing order became final and non-appealable on November 5, 2021.

The financing order, pursuant to the provisions of the Wildfire Financing Law, is irrevocable and is not subject to reduction, impairment or adjustment by further action of the California commission, except as contemplated by the periodic true-up adjustments.

We have filed the financing order with the SEC as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. We have summarized portions of the financing order below.

Fixed Recovery Charges

The Financing Order Requires the Imposition and Collection of Fixed Recovery Charges

Under the financing order, the California commission authorizes the owner of recovery property to impose, bill, collect and adjust from time to time a fixed recovery charge, to be collected on a per kWh basis from all customers (based on their FRC consumer class) until the bonds are paid in full and all other operating expenses have been recovered in full. Such fixed recovery charges will be in amounts sufficient to retire the principal amount of the bonds in accordance with the expected sinking fund schedule, to pay all interest on the bonds when due, and to pay all operating expenses relating to the bonds (operating expenses). Under the financing order, there is no limit on the amount of the fixed recovery charge. Any fixed recovery charges recovered after the payment of all of the bonds and related expenses will be credited back to SCE’s customers.

The Financing Order Provides that Fixed Recovery Charges are Nonbypassable

As required by the Wildfire Financing Law, the financing order provides that the fixed recovery charges are “nonbypassable” and must be paid by all customers in SCE’s service territory, except exempted customers. The financing order provides that customers with departing load must pay the fixed recovery charge on the departing load. Please read “The Depositor, Seller, Initial Servicer and Sponsor—Community Choice Aggregation, Direct Access and Departing Load” in this prospectus.

The financing order specifies that any successor to an electric utility shall perform and satisfy all obligations of the electric utility pursuant to the Wildfire Financing Law, including collecting and paying to the bondholders revenues arising with respect to the recovery property. The financing order states that it is binding on SCE and any successor to SCE that provides electric distribution service directly to consumers of electricity within SCE’s service territory.

In the servicing agreement, SCE will covenant to assert in an appropriate forum that any municipality, or any other person or entity, that acquires any portion of SCE’s electric distribution facilities must be treated as a successor to SCE under the Wildfire Financing Law and the financing order and that its retail customers remain responsible for payment of fixed recovery charges. Please read “The Servicing Agreement—Servicing Standards and Covenants” in this prospectus.

In addition, under the financing order and the Wildfire Financing Law, if any local municipality or tribe acquires SCE’s electric facilities though the power of eminent domain, consumers that no longer take transmission and distribution retail service from SCE, or that depart or reduce SCE service after the date of the financing order, or that meet relevant criteria in the applicable tariff will be treated as departing load customers and will be subject to pay the fixed recovery charges based on an approach that is consistent with the method currently in place for calculating Municipal DL obligations. SCE’s Municipal DL tariffs provide for calculation of certain nonbypassable charges based on consumption as metered or estimated. Historically, SCE has administered these tariffs by reaching agreement with the Municipal DL customer or the local municipality serving the Municipal DL customer for the payment of one or more lump sums based on a mutually acceptable estimate of the Municipal DL customer’s nonbypassable cost obligations, including obligations similar to the fixed recovery charges.

- 50 -

In addition, recent amendments to California law require approval of the California commission to the voluntary or involuntary change in ownership of the assets of an electrical or gas corporation to ownership by a public entity. In the financing order, the California commission also commits, in furtherance of the State pledge, in connection with any Commission proceeding to review the municipalization of SCE facilities by an entity that does not set retail rates subject to the California commission, to establish conditions to the approval of such municipalization transaction by the California commission which either (a) establish procedures to ensure that such entity will continue to bill and collect fixed recovery charges from customers and remit such collections to SCE or a new servicer for the bonds or (b) ensure the upfront funding of the fixed recovery charges that would otherwise be paid by customers where rate payment would be affected by the ownership change. See “The Depositor, Seller, Initial Servicer and Sponsor—Municipalization; Municipal Departing Load” in this prospectus.

The Financing Order Establishes the Methodology used to Calculate the Fixed Recovery Charges

The financing order describes the methodology by which the fixed recovery charges will be calculated and adjusted from time to time by the servicer pursuant to true-up advice letters submitted with the California commission as described below. Pursuant to the financing order, the fixed recovery charge will be a per kWh charge assessed against each customer as part of each customer’s regular monthly billing. A different fixed recovery charge will be calculated for each customer class (each, a FRC consumer class), based initially upon the allocation factor assigned to such class in SCE’s 2018 GRC Phase 2 Revenue Allocation and Rate Design Settlement, as the same may be adjusted based on sales adjustments contained in a routine true-up adjustment (GRC allocation factors, as further described below).

The servicer will determine the fixed recovery charge for each FRC consumer class in the following manner:

The above calculations by the servicer will result in two fixed recovery charges for each FRC consumer class, one charge for the first payment period and one charge for the second payment period. The financing order provides that the higher of the two charges for the FRC consumer class will be the fixed recovery charge for that FRC consumer class requested in the true-up adjustment.

- 51 -

The initial GRC allocation factors as approved by the California commission in SCE’s 2018 GRC Phase 2 Revenue Allocation and Rate Design Settlement and approved in the financing order are set forth in the table below. These initial GRC allocation factors set forth below are estimated. Under the financing order, the initial GRC allocation factors may be adjusted based on sales adjustments contained in a routine true-up adjustment. Please read “SCE’s Financing Order—Fixed Recovery Charges—The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically “True-Up” the Fixed Recovery Charge” in this prospectus.

The GRC allocation factors shown below reflect the allocation of cost in the 2018 GRC Phase 2 Revenue Allocation and Rate Design Settlement, and include within such factors customers who participate in CARE or FERA programs. As noted, under the Wildfire Financing Law, these customers are exempt from the payment of the fixed recovery charges. In accordance with the financing order, costs allocable to the CARE and FERA FRC customer classes will be reallocated to the remaining FRC customer classes on an equal-cents per kWh basis as shown below. In 2020, these exempt customers accounted for approximately 10.4% of total energy deliveries and approximately 27.9% of deliveries to the residential domestic FRC consumer classes. Please read “SCE’s Financing Order—Fixed Recovery Charges—The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically “True-Up” the Fixed Recovery Charge” in this prospectus.

Although the fixed recovery charges payable by each FRC consumer class will differ, any deficiency in the payment of such charges by any class of customers, including write-offs, will be included in determining the periodic payment requirement used in calculating the next “true-up” adjustment for all customers (other than exempted customers). Thus, all customers (other than exempted customers) will be responsible for paying the fixed recovery charges. Please read “SCE’s Financing Order—Fixed Recovery Charges—The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically “True-Up” the Fixed Recovery Charge” in this prospectus.

The Financing Order Requires the Servicer to Periodically “True-Up” the Fixed Recovery Charge

The financing order requires that the servicer submit with the California commission at least annually, an advice letter (each, an advice letter), applying the true-up methodology described above, to adjust the fixed recovery charges to ensure the recovery of revenues sufficient to provide for the timely payment of the periodic payment requirement. In addition to the mandatory annual true-up adjustment, the servicer is required to submit semi-annual advice letter to provide an accounting of historical over-collection and under-collection of Fixed Recovery Charges. The financing order permits the servicer to make a semi-annual true-up adjustment in connection with the filing of the semi-annual advice submission if it forecasts that Fixed Recovery Charge collections will be insufficient to make scheduled payments of principal of and interest on the Bonds and other

- 52 -

Financing Costs on a timely basis during the current or next succeeding payment period or to replenish any draws upon the capital subaccount. In addition, the servicer is authorized under the financing order to make interim routine adjustments at any time the servicer deems necessary to ensure the recovery of revenues sufficient to provide for the timely payment of the periodic payment requirement.

In addition, the financing order requires the servicer to implement quarterly true-up adjustments if bonds are outstanding following the scheduled final payment date for the latest maturing tranche of bonds. Mandatory annual true-up adjustments, semi-annual true-up adjustments, interim true-up adjustments and mandatory quarterly true-up adjustments as described above are referred to as routine true-up adjustments. Each such routine true-up adjustment shall utilize the methodology described above under the heading “—The Financing Order Establishes the Methodology used to Calculate the Fixed Recovery Charges” to determine the fixed recovery charges requested on the next adjustment date.

Routine annual true-up adjustment advice letters, semi-annual true-up adjustment letters, if required, and routine interim true-up adjustment letters must be submitted at least fifty days prior to proposed effective date of the adjustment. In each case, the California commission has committed in the financing order to provide a negative or affirmative response within twenty days of the submission of any routine true-up adjustment letter. Under the financing order, the California commission’s review of any routine true-up adjustment advice letter, and any protest, will be limited solely to determining whether there is any mathematical error in such advice letter. Any required correction of mathematical errors will not delay the effective date of such adjustment and, if such correction cannot be corrected prior to the effective date, such correction will be reflected in the next adjustment request.

The servicer is also authorized under the financing order to seek a non-routine true-up at any time to revise the logic, structure and components of the methodology approved in the financing order to determine the fixed recovery charges. We refer to such an adjustment as a non-routine true-up adjustment. A non-routine true-up adjustment advice letter must be submitted with the California commission at least ninety days prior to the effective date specified therein and will be acted upon by the California commission within sixty days. In connection with a non-routine true-up adjustment, the financing order provides that the energy division of the California commission should prepare a resolution for the California commission’s consideration that adopts, modifies or rejects the changes to the methodology proposed by the servicer. Absent such a resolution of the California commission that adopts, modifies or rejects the change proposed in a non-routine true-up mechanism letter, the servicer may implement such change if the proposed effective date is at least ninety days after the date of submission.

The Initial Fixed Recovery Charges

The initial fixed recovery charges will be determined and approved by the California commission as part of the issuance advice letter process described below. Please read “SCE’s Financing Order—Issuance Advice Letter” in this prospectus. The initial fixed recovery charge is expected to represent approximately 0.20% of the total bill, as of January 1, 2022, received by a 500 kWh residential customer of SCE. The fixed recovery charges will become effective on the date specified in the issuance advice letter, provided that the fixed recovery charges will not be included on customer bills until fourteen weeks after closing of the bonds, and will be subject to periodic true-up as described below. This delay will enable SCE to implement the necessary adjustments to its billing process.

Partial Payments of the Fixed Recovery Charges will be Pro-rated

The financing order provides that, if a customer pays only a portion of its bill, a pro-rata amount of such payment will be allocated to the payment of fixed recovery charges, based on the amount of the fixed recovery charges billed to all charges billed to such customer. The portion owed in respect of fixed recovery charges may be further allocated among different series of recovery bonds, including the bonds, issued pursuant to a financing

- 53 -

order to SCE by the California commission, based upon the fixed recovery charges billed with respect to each such series of additional recovery bonds. Please read “—Additional Bonds” in this prospectus.

Issuance Advice Letter

Within one business day after the pricing date of the bonds, SCE is required to submit to the California commission an issuance advice letter, which will:

The financing order provides that the issuance advice letter will be automatically approved and become effective at noon on the fourth business day after pricing unless before noon on the fourth business day after pricing the California commission issued an order finding that the proposed issuance does not comply with the financing order.

Servicing Agreement

In the financing order, the California commission authorized SCE, as the servicer, to enter into the servicing agreement described under “The Servicing Agreement” in this prospectus. Fixed recovery charges will be collected by SCE from customers as part of its normal collection activities. Fixed recovery charges will be deposited by SCE into the collection account under the terms of the indenture, the series supplement and the servicing agreement. Estimated fixed recovery charge collections will be remitted to the trustee on each business day. The estimated payments made by SCE will be based on daily billed amounts and the number of days customer bills remain outstanding (DSO). Estimated fixed recovery charge collections will be reconciled with actual fixed recovery charge collections, which, provided no servicer default has occurred and is continuing, may be based on estimated actual fixed recovery charge collections, which collections will be adjusted for DSO during the applicable reconciliation period, at least semi-annually. Please read “The Servicing Agreement—Remittances to Collection Account” in this prospectus.

Additional Bonds

We have been organized as a special purpose subsidiary of SCE for the limited purpose of holding recovery property and issuing recovery bonds, including the bonds, secured by recovery property and other collateral pledged to secure such recovery bonds. We have previously issued the Series 2021-A Bonds.

The Wildfire Financing Law permits SCE, upon receipt of an additional financing order to finance recovery costs through the issuance of additional recovery bonds issued by us or another issuing entity pursuant to a separate financing order and secured by separate recovery property. Our organizational documents, as well as the basic documents, give us the authority and flexibility to issue one or more series of additional recovery bonds authorized by additional financing orders and to acquire additional recovery property which will be pledged to such additional recovery bonds, subject to satisfaction of the rating agency condition. Please read “SCE Recovery Funding, The Issuing Entity” and –“Outstanding Bonds” in this prospectus.

- 54 -

The financing order provides that, in the event additional recovery bonds are issued by us or by another affiliate of SCE, the fixed recovery charges should be allocated ratably between the trustee and other bond trustees for the Series 2021-A Bonds and each series of additional recovery bonds.

In addition, SCE may seek additional financing orders to recover other costs. Please read “Risk Factors—Other Risks Associated with an Investment in the Bonds—SCE intends to cause the issuance, by us or other affiliated entities, of additional recovery bonds or other bonds secured by a nonbypassable charge on customers, which may cause a delay in the payment of the bonds and potential conflicts of interest among bondholders” in this prospectus. In addition, SCE has covenanted in the sale agreement that it will not sell recovery property or property comparable to the recovery property unless, among other conditions, the rating agency condition is satisfied and until it has entered into an intercreditor agreement described in “Security for the Bonds—Intercreditor Agreement” in this prospectus. Please read “The Sale Agreement—Covenants of the Seller” in this prospectus.

THE DEPOSITOR, SELLER, INITIAL SERVICER AND SPONSOR

General

SCE will be the depositor, seller and initial servicer of the recovery property securing the bonds, and will be the sponsor of the securitization in which bonds covered by this prospectus are issued.

SCE is an investor-owned public utility, organized under California law, primarily engaged in the business of supplying and delivering electricity through SCE’s electrical infrastructure to an approximately 50,000 square-mile area of southern California, excluding the City of Los Angeles and certain other cities. At September 30, 2021, SCE provided transmission and distribution service of electric power to 5.195 million retail consumers and, for the twelve months ended September 30, 2021, its total operating revenue was derived as follows: 40.0% commercial customers, 42.7% residential customers, 3.2% industrial customers, 3.9% public authorities, 4.0% agricultural and other, and 6.3%^* other operating revenue. During 2020, exempted customers accounted for 10.4% of SCE’s total electric deliveries and approximately 27.9% of deliveries to the residential domestic FRC consumer classes. SCE is an operating subsidiary of Edison International, a parent holding company based in Rosemead, California. The bonds do not constitute a debt, liability or other legal obligation of SCE or Edison International.

Community Choice Aggregation, Direct Access and Departing Load

Customers within SCE’s service territory may purchase their energy from certain other energy suppliers. In 2002, California Assembly Bill 117 was signed into law, allowing cities and counties to form CCAs. Community choice aggregation is a program that allows cities, counties, other California public agencies and Joint Power Authorities to procure electricity for customers located within the city or county or public agency’s jurisdictional area, including within SCE’s service territory. Customers not wishing to participate must opt out. As of year-end 2020, SCE had nine CCAs serving customers in its service territory that represent approximately 22% of SCE’s total service load. One CCA significantly expanded in 2019 and approximately six new or expanded CCAs have been approved by the CPUC to serve customers in 2020. Based on recent load statistics, SCE anticipates that direct access and CCA load will be approximately 36% of its total service load by the end of 2021. When customers are served by a CCA, SCE continues to be responsible for the transmission and distribution of the electricity, as well as metering and billing and consumers must pay the fixed recovery charges on all electricity consumption.

California law also provides limited opportunities for customers in SCE’s service territory to choose to purchase power directly from an ESP or a Community Aggregator, other than a CCA. A limited, phased-in partial reopening of direct access for nonresidential customers was authorized in 2010, and an additional limited

- 55 -

partial reopening of direct access was authorized in 2018. During 2020, an average of 27,097 customers, consuming 10,173,627 MWh of electricity, took service on direct access. SCE’s forecasts of electricity demand assume that the limitations on direct access (described below as the DA cap) will be increased from and after 2021. Please read “The Depositor, Seller, Initial Servicer and Sponsor—Forecasting Electricity Consumption” in this prospectus. As with the CCAs, when a customer who previously took bundled service from SCE converts to taking procurement service from an ESP or Community Aggregator, SCE remains that customer’s transmission and distribution provider and customers must pay the fixed recovery charges on all electric consumption.

Other forms of departing load (DL) include customer generation, and load that departs SCE service entirely to take electricity service from a publicly owned utility or a tribal utility. Please read “—Municipalization; Municipal Departing Load” in this prospectus.

Another form of departing load includes customer generation. Under current CPUC decisions, DL customers taking NEM service with solar generation are billed on a net-metered basis. Pursuant to the financing order, and in accordance with SCE’s existing tariffs, fixed recovery charges will be imposed only on each kWh of electricity that is imported from the SCE net of exports in each metered interval. Under SCE’s current tariffs, DL customers who self-generate using generation facilities which do not qualify for NEM but which interconnect to and operate in parallel with SCE’s electric system must also pay the fixed recovery charges based on metered consumption, or if metered consumption is not available, then estimated based on historical load, and also pay the fixed recovery charges on electric service they receive from SCE when the customer’s load is not served by the customer’s generation facility (i.e., in a partial or complete outage of the generation facility).

Under SCE’s existing tariff applicable to customer generation departing load, customers are not subject to a departing load charge in certain circumstances, including when the customer physically disconnects from SCE’s grid, when customers experience changes in usage in the normal course of business, and customers whose load is served from a back-up unit during certain emergency conditions.

Pursuant to the financing order, SCE is required to utilize DL tariffs existing as of the effective date of the financing order to determine the consumption on which fixed recovery charges will be imposed on DL customers. Current departing load tariffs do not apply to customers who disconnect entirely from SCE’s grid. However, the financing order requires that the fixed recovery charges be paid by such disconnected customers using the same methodology as that applied to other DL customers under existing DL tariffs.

SCE Retail Consumer Base and Electric Energy Consumption

SCE’s retail consumer base currently consists of thirteen revenue reporting rate classes, referred to herein as FRC consumer classes: Residential Domestic (Non-CARE), Residential Domestic (FERA), Res/Dom Income Qualified (CARE), Small C&I (<20 kW), Medium C&I (20 kW-200 kW), Medium C&I (200 kW-500 kW), Traffic Control, Large C&I (Sec), Large C&I (Pri), Large C&I (Sub), Small Ag & Pump (<200 kW), Large Ag & Pump (>200 kW), Street/Area Lighting. Under the Wildfire Financing Law, the Residential Domestic (FERA) and Res/Dom Income Qualified (CARE) are exempt from paying the fixed recovery charges and the costs associated with these groups is allocated to the remaining FRC consumer classes.

- 56 -

The following tables show the electricity delivered to retail consumers, electric delivery revenues and number of retail consumers at distribution voltage for each of the thirteen revenue reporting rate classes for 2020 and each of the four preceding years. There can be no assurances that the retail electricity sales, retail electric revenues and number of retail consumers or the composition of any of the foregoing will remain at or near the levels reflected in the following tables.

- 57 -

Forecasting Electricity Consumption

SCE develops retail electricity sales forecasts at least once a year and does limited updates to reflect bundled load migration and other minor changes more often for regulatory filings. SCE most recently updated its retail sales forecast in December 2020 to incorporate actual load impact in 2020 due to the pandemic conditions, and reflect the latest vendor (macroeconomics and demographic) forecast and updated outlooks for distributed energy resources (such as solar photovoltaic, battery storage, electrovoltaic, etc.). In addition, SCE updated its bundled forecast in May 2021 for the CPUC in connection with the approval of SCE’s revenue requirement for calendar year 2022. SCE is currently forecasting a decrease in bundled sales of more than 8% in calendar year 2022, due largely to CCA departures and other conditions (such as increasing solar PV installations).

SCE develops econometric models to forecast electricity sales for the residential, commercial, industrial, government, and agricultural market segments. These forecasts will be used to calculate the fixed recovery charges for any given period, in order to determine the revenue required to meet the expected sinking fund schedules for the bonds.

For the residential sector, electricity consumption is modeled as a function of electricity prices, cooling and heating degree days, and metro economic output. The commercial sector is modeled as a function of electricity prices, cooling and heating degree days, and regional economic output for SCE’s service territory. Electricity usage for the industrial sector is modeled as a function of cooling degree days and electricity prices. Government electric usage is modeled as a function of cooling degree days, electricity prices, and government employment in SCE’s service territory. Finally, agricultural usage is projected using San Joaquin Valley river runoff from the Eastern Sierra Mountains and regional economic output for SCE’s service territory. Forecasted weather-related drivers assume normal weather conditions. Historically trended weather projections that are close to 20-year averages are used to create weather drivers such as heating and cooling degree-days, and rainfall are employed in developing the sales forecast.

SCE’s electricity demand forecast models have been in use in their current form for more than five years and have undergone extensive review by the CPUC and the California Energy Commission, respectively. Each year SCE updates these models with the most recent recorded data, and conducts testing to ensure that model statistics meet the highest standards possible.

SCE’s forecast reflects the lifting of the existing direct access cap (DA cap) starting in 2021, including partial increases in the DA cap in 2021 and 2022. This assumption will be adjusted in early 2022 as more

- 58 -

information about likely DA increases under the expanded cap become available. As discussed above, SCE has had various CCAs form and become operational, which resulted in departing load starting in May 2015 and continuing. To account for this departing CCA load, SCE will, beginning in 2023, incorporate a probabilistic view that is based on a Monte Carlo simulation to forecast future potential CCA load departure. SCE has incorporated its best estimate of the departing CCA load to this forecast based on the best information SCE had received at the time that this forecast was made. As a result, SCE’s bundled sales growth in the current forecast has been reduced relative to retail sales growth as compared to earlier forecasts.

The table below shows energy forecasts and variances from the forecast for the five years 2016-2020.

Variances among the FRC consumer classes, which are used to allocate payment responsibility for the bonds, may differ from the variances shown above, as the classifications relate to distribution voltage only.

Billing and Collections

In 2020, SCE received approximately 78% of total bill payments electronically, through means such as electronic funds transfer, electronic data interchange, and online and credit card payments. Approximately 17.5% of bill payments were received via U.S. Mail and the remaining 4.5% were received through Authorized Payment Agencies (walk in payments).

Bills are due within 19 days after they are issued. If a customer (residential or commercial) does not pay their bill on time, SCE applies a LPC of 0.6% of the past-due balance. For residential, non-CARE customers, SCE mails a 15-day overdue notice and a subsequent 48-hour (Disconnect) notice. SCE makes a reasonable attempt to contact an adult person residing at the customer’s residence at least 24 hours prior to termination of service. For small commercial accounts, a five-day overdue notice is mailed if payment is not received when due and a LPC is charged. A 48-hour disconnect notice is also provided prior to disconnection of service for small commercial customers. All other commercial accounts receive a five-day overdue notice and although not required, these commercial customers may also be provided with a 48-hour disconnect notice prior to disconnection of service.

For residential and non-residential customers, a closing bill including all unpaid amounts is generally issued within three to ten days of service termination. Once the closing bill is issued, a closing bill notice is mailed if the balance remains unpaid 30 days after issuance of the closing bill. If amounts remain outstanding after 60 days, a letter is mailed to customers advising them of a potential placement with credit bureaus. Accounts are placed with credit bureaus at day 90. Under current policies, unpaid closed account balances are written off 365 days after the final bill is issued. The unpaid balance may be referred to a collection agency 185 days after the account closes and remains with the agency for six months.

Generally, service may be disconnected if payment is not received after all notifications have been provided. Please read “—COVID-19 Customer Protections” below for current measure restricting SCE’s ability to disconnect customers for non-payment. The California commission adopted certain additional regulations relating to disconnection that would make permanent certain of the provisions of the temporary protections enacted in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic which may extend the time it takes to complete the process of disconnecting customers for nonpayment.

Before restoring service that has been shut-off for non-payment, SCE has the right to require the payment of the past due amount, a reconnection fee, and a deposit, if applicable.

- 59 -

Credit Policy

Under California law and CPUC regulatory guidelines, SCE is obligated to provide service to electricity customers in its service territory regardless of their creditworthiness.

Certain accounts are secured with deposits or guarantees to reduce losses. Since the vast majority of customers pay their bills within the allotted time, it is not necessary to require deposits from all customers. Specific criteria have been developed for establishing credit. These criteria are based on multiple factors, including prior service, payment history, or external credit score.

In June 2020, the CPUC issued a decision that prohibits investor-owned utilities, such as SCE, from collecting deposits from residential customers for the establishment and reestablishment of service. Therefore, SCE will not secure any new residential customer accounts, or those reconnected after June 11, 2020 after a service disconnection for non-payment.

Non-residential customers may establish credit by depositing cash equal to twice the highest monthly electric charge or furnishing a satisfactory guarantor, or other credit support such as a surety bond, a certificate of deposit or an irrevocable letter of credit.

SCE may change its credit and collections policies from time to time.

COVID-19 Customer Protections

Effective March 2020, SCE implemented various protections for residential and small businesses customers as ordered by the CPUC. These protections include:

The CPUC ordered that these protections would remain in effect through April 16, 2021, or until the COVID-19 customer protections are lifted, except those made permanent or extended by Decision 20-06-003, issued by the California commission in June 2020. On February 11, 2021, the California commission approved a resolution extending the moratorium on service disconnections for residential and small business consumers to June 30, 2021. On June 24, 2021, the CPUC extended COVID-19 consumer protections for all customers to September 30, 2021 in Decision D.21-06-036. In addition, the February 11, 2021 resolution ordered utilities to submit advice letters containing their respective transition plans associated with the discontinuance of the emergency consumer protections on June 30, 2021. SCE submitted its advice letter and transition plan to the California commission for review on April 28, 2021, which was approved by the California commission on April 28, 2021.

In addition, on April 19, 2021, the California commission issued a final decision to implement a temporary moratorium on service disconnection for medium and large commercial and industrial consumers through June 30, 2021. To be eligible, medium or large commercial or industrial consumers must be enrolled in and current on a payment plan by June 30, 2021. On June 24, 2021, the California commission extended COVID-19 consumer protections for all customers to September 30, 2021.

Upon the September 30, 2021 expiration of these consumer protections, SCE anticipated a return to normal collections operations. However, due to required IT system enhancements to ensure accurate and compliant credit and collections processes, SCE has extended these protections through early 2022. To mitigate potential revenue losses due to uncollected revenue during this extension of the moratorium on the aforementioned credit and collections activities, the California commission authorized the large California-jurisdictional energy utilities to establish a two-way balancing account to track any unpaid balanced and request recovery through future regulatory proceedings.

- 60 -

In addition to the above mandated protections, SCE suspended the assessment of LPCs, mailing of disconnect notices, and mailing of commercial overdue notices.

The net write-offs as a percentage of billed revenue for its retail customers for the first six months of 2020 and 2021 was 0.16% and 0.11%, respectively.

Days Sales Outstanding

The following table sets forth information relating to the average number of days retail customer electricity bills remained outstanding for the five years ending December 31, 2016 through 2020:

The average days sales outstanding for June 2020 compared to the average days sales outstanding for June 2021 increased from 17.6 days to 29.5 days, or a 68% increase reflecting the impact of COVID-19, including customer impacts and implementation of the California commission disconnection policies.