TIDMSGEM 
 
From:              ScotGems plc 
 
LEI:                  549300GQHCPU9P1NYM13 
 
Date:               11 March 2022 
 
Results for the year ended 31 December 2021 
 
The Directors of ScotGems plc ("the Company") are pleased to announce the 
Company's results for the year ended 31 December 2021. 
 
  * The Company's objective is to provide long-term capital growth by investing 
    in a diversified portfolio of small cap companies listed on global stock 
    markets across a range of sectors. 
  * During 2021 the share price fell by 0.7% and the Net Asset Value ("NAV") 
    rose by 8.2%. 
 
Chairman's Statement 
 
The disappointing performance of your Trust in both absolute and relative terms 
since inception is attributable to the Managers' cautious approach to investing 
the initial funds raised at a time of rising markets, and its subsequent 
geographical allocation. In particular, their focus on corporate governance - 
firmly endorsed by the Board- has led them to have a minimal weighting in 
China. Valuations in South Korea and Taiwan also discouraged them from 
establishing significant positions in these very popular markets. The latter 
three Asian markets, which together accounted for nearly 50% of the MSCI 
Emerging Markets Small Cap Index and over 60% of the MSCI Emerging Index at the 
end of 2021, have been the primary driver of the whole emerging markets asset 
class over the last few years. 
 
A substantial exposure to Africa, now significantly reduced, has also detracted 
from performance over all periods. Specifically, significant difficulties in 
convertibility of sales proceeds from Nigeria has resulted in the Trust making 
a provision of over 30% against remaining investments in that country. As will 
become clear in the following Investment Manager's report, the content of the 
portfolio is driven by a bottom up, stock selection process and is not 
influenced by index weightings. 
 
Quantitative easing has meant little attention being paid to sustainable cash 
flow generation in all markets. Many conceptually attractive but totally 
unproven smaller companies have, until recently, achieved astronomical 
valuations - hence the outperformance of the Emerging Markets Small Cap Index 
since inception and, most noticeably, over the last year. 
 
The investment team at Stewart Investors running your Portfolio changed in late 
2019. While performance in 2020 continued to disappoint, a positive NAV return 
was achieved in 2021, with the Manager's emphasis on capital preservation and 
stewardship leading to much improved relative returns. The Board is pleased to 
see this trend being sustained in the volatile markets we have recently been 
experiencing. As significant shareholders in the Trust ourselves, we are aware 
that there is still considerable ground to recover and that better performance 
has yet to be reflected in the wide share price/net asset value discount now 
prevailing. 
 
Your Trust currently has a portfolio of 40 companies, the market capitalisation 
of each being less than $2.5 billion at the time of investment. The Investment 
Manager has set out below a detailed description of the existing portfolio, as 
well as their philosophy in selecting the particular companies in which 
ScotGems invests. 
 
Given the current focus on environmental, social and governance ("ESG") 
investing within the asset management industry, our Investment Manager has set 
out on pages 14 and 15 of the Annual Report a detailed description of their 
approach to ESG and included a relevant case study. Stewart Investors' 
investment philosophy has always been based on the principle of responsible 
stewardship, and they have long implemented ESG inputs as part of their 
investment process. 
 
The conflict in Ukraine has quickly become an area of focus for the Board. We 
will continue to monitor any impact the conflict may have on the Company. 
However, the situation has highlighted how little the Board can do to mitigate 
against such geopolitical risks. We of course hope that a peaceful outcome can 
be found. 
 
Until very recently, our Investment Manager had avoided direct investment in 
Russian companies largely on corporate governance concerns. Regrettably, on 24 
February 2022, they bought a position (1.1% of Trust NAV) in a London-listed 
GDR of a Russian retailer called the Fix Price Group. The Board were very 
surprised with such a decision being made, and even more so that First Sentier 
Investors permitted such a trading instruction to be processed, in the 
prevailing circumstances. Given that stock market trading in all London listed 
Russian companies has subsequently been suspended, this investment is now held 
in the portfolio at nil value. 
 
James Findlay has decided to stand down from the Board at the AGM in 2022. He 
has brought a wealth of experience to the Board of the Company, providing 
effective challenge and oversight of the Investment Manager since the Company's 
inception. 
 
The Board and Managers remain aligned with the body of shareholders through 
their own investment in the Company. The Directors (including persons closely 
associated with them) hold 2,290,096 Ordinary shares. In addition a further 
2,500,000 shares are held by the Tam O'Shanter Trust, of which Angus Tulloch is 
the Chairman.  The Investment Management Team have increased their 
shareholdings by 489,201 shares and now own 2,176,982 Ordinary shares, with a 
further 1,363,364 shares held by other Stewart Investors' employees. Including 
shares owned by the Stewart Investors Employee Benefits Trust (unchanged at 
5,000,000 Ordinary shares), this brings the total holding of Stewart Investors' 
employees to 8,540,346 Ordinary shares. The combined holdings of the Board and 
Investment Manager now represent 24.9% of the issued Ordinary share capital of 
the Company. 
 
On 9 March 2022 First Sentier Investors resigned from the management of the 
Company's portfolio. They will however continue to manage the Company's 
portfolio until alternative arrangements have been made (subject to a maximum 
period of six months). The Board has received interest from a number parties 
regarding the management of the Company's portfolio, and the Board will 
communicate the outcome of these discussions in due course. 
 
The Annual General Meeting will be held on 5 May 2022 at the London offices of 
First Sentier Investments. I look forward to seeing many of you there. This 
will be the first opportunity which we have had to hold such a meeting since 
the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. There will be a presentation by the 
investment team and an opportunity to question them in more detail about 
strategy and individual investments that the Company has made. 
 
Investment Manager's Report 
 
Introduction 
 
We wrote six months ago that ScotGems owns a lot of "jam today" companies - by 
which we meant well-stewarded businesses which we can value according to actual 
cash flows rather than hopes, dreams, and powerpoint presentations. It feels 
like owning "real" businesses could be coming back into fashion. Even modest 
increases in some central bank interest rates are focusing the mind on how to 
discount far-off predictions back to their value today. But fiddling with 
discount rates answers a very linear question. The more important and 
distinctly non-linear question is whether predictions for some of the most 
generously valued companies are plausible in the first place. Over?paying for 
growth is a "linear sin" - the sums change and clients lose maybe 20% or 30% or 
50%. Paying anything at all for a concept which doesn't come true is a "non? 
linear sin" - you lose nearly everything nearly every time. 
 
Brasil always provides great examples of extremes. A high-profile example is 
playing out right now. At its listing in December 2021, "Nubank" was the most 
valuable financial company in all of Latin America. It is very "sign of the 
times". Although a Brasilian business, it is incorporated in the Caymans and 
listed in New York. The founder has shares with 20x votes per share - an 
unusually high voting multiple even for fintech. It probably goes without 
saying that Nubank is backed by SoftBank's deep but increasingly debt-funded 
pockets, and maybe also that "we have incurred losses since our inception, and 
we may not achieve profitability". So if none of the above was a surprise in 
today's enlightened times - what was? Well, it wasn't that "total expenses for 
the 2021 contingent shares awards are expected to be approximately 
US$400-500m". No, the surprise was that "None of our subsidiaries is licensed 
to operate as a bank". At time of writing in late January, Nubank is merely the 
third most valuable financial business in Latin America - as it happens, both 
of the firms which have overtaken it have banking licences, make money hand 
over fist, and pay dividends. I can't imagine either of them paying their hired 
hands half a billion dollars. 
 
The small companies' end of GEM doesn't have quite such glamourous examples as 
Nubank but it is not short on conceptual valuations. The very nature of many 
smaller companies is that they make only one or two products, selling only to a 
handful of customers or to a single industry. The companies may be as honest as 
the day is long but they are risky. We don't avoid companies with a narrow 
franchise but we do try to value them conservatively recognising that the 
famines between the feasts can last some time. 
 
Our other area of concern is Indian valuations. India has a long list of high 
quality small and mid-cap companies but valuations are often excessive. The 
local retail investor has (re)discovered their appetite for risk, foreign 
investors are perhaps redeploying money from nearby communist regimes, and 
perhaps above all, money globally remains plentiful and cheap. ScotGems is the 
only portfolio we run from Edinburgh which is "underweight" what the benchmark 
says we should have in India. For our larger-cap portfolios we grudgingly 
accept the full valuations for large and diversified multi-billion dollar 
companies - qualitatively they are better than large-cap alternatives. In the 
smaller companies world of ScotGems we see Indian over-valuation as a bigger 
gamble - the smaller companies are typically less proven and narrower in 
franchise yet with no corresponding valuation discount. More importantly and 
more optimistically, we think we have found more attractive long term ideas 
elsewhere. 
 
One idea added to the portfolio in 2021 was Prodia Widyahusada - a medical 
diagnostics firm. It is a family controlled Indonesian business which leads the 
market. We believe it has many years of growth ahead of it, not only via 
"classic" emerging market factors (rising wealth and growing population) but 
more importantly through the competence of its owner-managers. We acquired 
shares for the Trust at a trailing price-to-earnings multiple of just under 15x 
(or closer to 12x if adjusting for the net cash on balance sheet at the time) 
and its historic revenue growth was just shy of 10% in US Dollars for the 
previous three and five years. We considered this an attractive entry point. By 
way of comparison, the nearest Indian equivalent trades at nearer 75x trailing 
price-to-earnings. It has grown more rapidly - between 10-15% per annum for the 
last three and five years - but at 75x earnings this growth needs to carry on 
for a very long time indeed. One important difference between India and 
Indonesia is competitive intensity. Despite the attractiveness of the 
Indonesian market, Prodia faces only modest levels of competition. In contrast, 
India is to many the "last great untapped opportunity". As a result, every man 
and his dog (and the dog's private equity fund) are busy buying shares in 
existing companies or providing capital to competitors. This famously happened 
in India a decade ago in the telecoms market - licences were begged, borrowed 
or stolen and capital was destroyed. India today may be a little cleaner than 
it was then, and the sectors attracting capital are less licence dependent 
(anything medical, anything online/tech related, all things consumer). 
Nonetheless, the potential to lose money is probably quite high. We have been 
fortunate in 2021 to make good money in India but we have also trimmed nearly 
all our Indian holdings. 
 
I hope the remainder of the report helps explain what we have done with 
shareholders' money as well as offer some guidance as to how and why we have 
made decisions. Thank you for reading. 
 
Portfolio 
 
The portfolio consists of shares in 40 companies. The ten largest names 
represent 40.6% of the portfolio and is a small reduction from 42.7% at the end 
of 2020 and 46.4% at the end of 2019 when a shareholder resolution was passed 
to allow a slightly longer list of companies. Cash started the year at 2.6% and 
ended at 2.9%. 
 
At the end of the year the average market cap (weighted by position size) was 
$1.65bn and the average free float (weighted by position size) at the end of 
November was 49.1%. This small free float reflects the frequency with which we 
find the qualities we require by investing alongside a controlling shareholder. 
36 of the 40 companies in the portfolio have a controlling shareholder. 
 
New Holdings 
 
During the year we bought shares in eight new companies. Below is a list shown 
in descending order of size in the portfolio at the end of the period. Of the 
eight new companies, Prodia Widyahusada and NESR are the product of more recent 
work whilst the remainder have been owned before in portfolios managed by our 
team, but subject to ongoing research. 
 
Anadolu Efes (or Efes) is a Turkish listed brewer. It is controlled by the 
founding Özilhan and Yaz?c? families, and the global brewer ABI has a stake 
inherited from its merger with SAB Miller. We like the combination of committed 
family and multinational oversight and have seen it succeed many times before 
in GEM. In 2018, ABI and Efes pooled their Russian beer businesses into a 50/50 
JV which is the joint market leader with approximately 30% market share. Efes 
also owns a stake in a Coke bottler operating across several CIS states and in 
Pakistan where it is growing rapidly. Although Turkish listed, over three 
quarters of earnings are derived outside Turkey. Over the last five years, the 
company has rapidly repaid debt meaning it offers a substantial yield earned 
from a steadily growing business. The repayment of debt is partly responsible 
for our increased conviction here. 
 
Post script - 4 March 2022: Efes has three breweries in Ukraine held through 
the 50/50 JV with ABI. These have currently ceased production. These, and the 
50/50 JV with global brewer ABI in Russia represent approximately 20-25% of 
Efes overall. It remains to be seen what the longer term value of this business 
is and whether any profits can be repatriated. The largest part of Efes is a 
stake in a Coke bottler (with nil Russian exposure). It also sells beer in 
Turkey and several CIS states. Efes is Turkish incorporated and listed on the 
Istanbul stock exchange. 
 
Alicorp is a consumer goods company, headquartered in Peru and a market leader 
in its home market but also with a presence in Bolivia, Ecuador and other parts 
of Latin America. It is controlled by the Romero family. They also control 
Credicorp, a bank, and a family member sits on the board of Hochschild Mining, 
another holding in ScotGems. Alicorp dominates many of the markets in which it 
operates (mayonnaise, pasta, sauces, cookies and crackers) despite competing 
against most multinationals. Recent external hires of senior staff with 
multinational experience indicate that the company is evolving from a family 
business to a more professional one. It is highly cash generative. Risks 
include the fact that the company has stretched its balance sheet in the past 
as a result of acquiring businesses, although the strong predictable cashflows 
of the business means the debt was swifty repaid. Alicorp has some less 
glamorous divisions (fish food for farmed prawns and salmon for instance) and 
although these do not deserve the rating of some of the branded parts of the 
company, they have still contributed useful cashflows. The company was 
attractively valued when purchased and we added to the holding during the 
recent election-related sell-off in Peru. 
 
Prodia Widyahusada is an Indonesian listed medical diagnostics business with a 
US$230m market cap at time of purchase and a free float which represents 25% of 
shares outstanding. It is controlled by the founders and their families, and is 
conservatively financed after its IPO in 2016. It is the largest private sector 
diagnostics business in Indonesia and comes with an excellent record for 
quality. One piece of evidence of this is the fact that they are the only 
Indonesian diagnostics chain with a College of American Pathologist 
accreditation. Its track record demonstrates that the model benefits from large 
economies of scale - it can drive down costs as it grows allowing it to reduce 
pricing which in turn allows it to continue to gain market share. The business 
model has been successful many times in GEM including Integrated Diagnostics 
Holdings (IDH) operating primarily in Egypt, and whose shares are also held in 
the portfolio. The model deserves a strong social license given that early 
diagnosis allows early treatment, and should therefore lead to higher survival 
rates. Early diagnosis and treatment also take cost out of a healthcare system 
which is chronically underdeveloped. Risks include changes in regulation 
although this is mitigated to a degree by the essential nature of its work. In 
addition, the similarity to the business model of IDH , the Egyptian 
diagnostics business we own, will limit our position size here. 
 
Jumbo is a Greek listed retailer operating in Greece, Cyprus, Bulgaria and 
Romania. It is controlled and managed by the Vakakis family. It sells small 
baskets of everyday cheap items in a model which is comparable to Dollar 
General in the USA. This has so far made it less vulnerable to online retail 
than other formats such as the department store model. We are impressed by the 
company's ability to grow through past periods of economic stress in Greece and 
by its growth in new markets. It is conservatively financed and has pre-paid 
historically for much of its inventory in order to improve pricing. We first 
met with the company during the wreckage of the 2008 crisis - a period which 
the company positively enjoyed. We first tried to establish a position for the 
Trust in 2020 but were only able to buy a small number of shares before the 
valuation increased beyond a point where we were comfortable. 
 
Bladex (full name Banco Latinoamericano de Exportaciones) is a bank which 
facilitates the transactions of international trade. It is listed on the New 
York Stock Exchange, is headquartered in Panama and operates across Latin 
America and the Caribbean. The central banks of the countries in these regions 
own shares and have the opportunity to elect board members. It plays an 
important role in the economic development and integration of the region 
through its reputation as a supportive lender. This reputation comes from its 
historic lending in periods when other international banks avoid the region, 
normally in periods of crisis. It is very affordably valued and is well 
positioned to enjoy an economic recovery. Although its loans are mostly short 
term US$ trade finance, the risk with every bank including Bladex is that it 
loses lending discipline in the future. 
 
Vitasoy is a Hong Kong-based producer of healthy plant-based products including 
soya milk, tea, juice and tofu with most of its sales from mainland China. Our 
team first owned the company in client funds in the 1990s. The founding Lo 
family, now in their second generation, owns approximately 20% of the company 
and today it is run by professional management. The company demonstrates an 
impressive track record of long term decision making - we would argue that the 
time frame for these decisions has only been made possible under family 
ownership. We admire the decision taken many years ago to take profits 
generated in Hong Kong and to use them to invest in building a leading soy milk 
franchise in China and Australia. It took a very long time for the company to 
succeed, yet China is now its largest market. Today the company is well 
positioned to benefit from changing consumer trends towards health and 
well-being, increasing demand for protein and increasing water scarcity in 
China. This last point relates to the fact that growing soya beans is 
significantly less water intensive than dairy production. The company generates 
strong cash flows and is financially robust. Recently, an internal memo was 
leaked to the press. This memo showed that a staff member had offered 
condolences to the family of an employee who had committed a politically 
motivated crime, committed as an individual rather than within the company's 
sphere of influence, then committed suicide. This led to a boycott of Vitasoy 
products - a sign of how unpredictable China is, but also a chance to initiate 
a position in the company at what we believe to be an attractive price. 
 
NESR (full name National Energy Services Reunited) is an oilfield services 
provider, listed in New York and serving Middle Eastern and North African 
markets. NESR does not own oil producing assets but helps its customers access 
their reserves more efficiently. It is still in its early stages of 
development, but we are backing Sherif Foda the company's founder. He spent two 
decades at Schlumberger (also in oilfield services) where he ultimately ran the 
largest of its three divisions, a US$30 billion revenue business. NESR 
originated as a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) but contrary to 
common recent use of the SPAC merger approach, often used to acquire 
speculative businesses, it was launched to acquire and merge two businesses 
from Saudi Arabia and Oman respectively, which were both profitable at time of 
acquisition. The sellers of the two businesses remain shareholders of the 
combined entity and are well-respected locally. The company operates in the 
world's lowest cost region - lowest in terms of operational cost per barrel but 
also in terms of environmental impact. It has a tailwind from the desire of 
petrostates in the Middle East to increase their sourcing from indigenous firms 
- the history and shareholders of this firm tick that box. Although oil 
services revenues are more closely linked to volume of production than the oil 
price directly, the risks to the investment clearly include the oil price as 
well as the speed of transition to alternative sources of energy. Any hint of 
untoward procurement practices would also be damaging - we are comforted here 
as the decision to turn two private companies into one US listed public company 
is a radical increase in transparency. In light of these potential risks, and 
in common with our views on any company linked to commodities, we are unlikely 
to own a large position. 
 
Youngone Corporation is the operating company of Youngone Holdings which has 
been held in the portfolio since near inception. It operates as a clothing 
manufacturer listed in Korea but mostly manufacturing in Bangladesh. It has 
played a pivotal role in building the garment sector into the country's most 
important export industry. Its customers include brands such as The North Face 
and Patagonia. During 2021 we invested in shares of the operating company 
because we believe that it benefits our company engagement to own shares in 
both entities - we admire the group and its ultra-conservative family owners 
very much but are keen for a slightly more generous dividend. In addition we 
want to increase our exposure to a company which earns hard currency, has a net 
cash balance sheet and which remains extremely favourably valued. Youngone 
Corporation also owns a majority stake in the bicycle brand "Scott", a business 
which has prospered during the pandemic. 
 
Additions 
 
The two largest additions to existing investments were to Orascom Construction 
and IAM Chile. 
 
We added to Orascom Construction, an engineering and construction contractor 
for infrastructure, industrial and commercial projects, operating in the Middle 
East, North Africa and the United States. It 
 
is owned by the founding Sawiris family. Nassef Sawiris, has proven his 
entrepreneurial ability many times - most evidently in selling his cement 
business to Lafarge with excellent timing. During 2021, the company reported a 
healthy pipeline of new projects including Egypt's first high-speed rail system 
and sizeable contracts in the student housing sector in the United States. The 
company is attractively valued. Some of our addition was merely reinvesting 
dividends received - the trailing dividend yield is almost 10%, paid in US 
Dollars. 
 
IAM Chile (full name is Inversiones Aguas Metropolitanas) is a holding company 
with a 50% stake in Aguas Andinas, Chile's largest water utility. Over the long 
term the company has attractive defensive qualities, providing an inflation 
protected dividend yield. The company also has a strong social purpose given 
that it provides potable water to one of Latin America's largest metropolitan 
areas. In the shorter term and as discussed in the Interim Report, it is likely 
that it has been affected by investor concerns following a vote to rewrite the 
constitution of Chile, possibly partly due to a low turnout and as a rejection 
of established political parties. Uncertainty remains but we are more sanguine 
than the consensus given that most citizens own assets in some form or another 
so have something to lose from any undermining of property rights. A recent 
interest rate rise in Chile is also evidence that institutions retain some 
independence. Nonetheless this uncertainty has left the company attractively 
valued and we have increased our investment. 
 
Disposals 
 
During the year we sold all of the shares held in four companies. Below is a 
list in descending order of size at the start of the year. 
 
Voltronic Power is a Taiwanese business, manufacturing and selling 
uninterruptable power supplies (UPS) and electrical inverters. The founder Alex 
Hsieh owns 20% of the shares. He started his first UPS business in 1979 before 
selling it to Phoenixtec. He left in 2007 with a number of colleagues in order 
to set up Voltronic, having noticed that there was an opportunity for a company 
that did not compete with its branded customers. This lack of competition has 
built trust, as has the high quality of Voltronic's own products and their 
ability to reduce customers' time to market with their new products. It is rare 
for us to find a company as focused as this but we are uncomfortable with itsvaluation. We first discussed reducing it in the 2020 Annual Report but have 
now sold all of our shares. 
 
RCL Foods is a South African business generating the majority of its earnings 
from commodity foods such as chicken and sugar. The company is controlled by 
the Rupert family's South African investment holding company, Remgro. Our 
investment case had been based on Remgro's desire to turn it into the leading 
consumer goods business in South Africa, using cash flows generated by the 
existing business. Remgro has an impressive track record of developing new 
businesses including FirstRand, which we believe is perhaps the best financial 
services firm in South Africa and Richemont a leading global luxury goods 
company. RCL has announced that it will separate its commodity foods business, 
whilst growing its consumer goods businesses through acquisitions. This 
announcement was well received by investors but one which we believe introduces 
additional risk into a business which is already something of a turnaround. The 
company's transition may well work and we have the upmost respect for Remgro 
but prefer other consumer staples companies such as Alicorp (discussed earlier) 
because it is far more cash generative, and has far larger market shares. 
 
Dis-Chem Pharmacies is a pharmacy chain in South Africa. It is a strong 
franchise but we have concerns that stewardship might not be as strong as we 
had previously thought. This was demonstrated in part by recent poor disclosure 
of a related party transaction (RPT), despite us discussing other RPTs with 
them. Governance issues such as this are relatively frequent in family owned 
GEM companies in their early stages or even before they list. They can be 
acceptable on a case-by-case basis, but in this instance we were unable to 
remain confident that governance is heading in the right direction. 
 
Indus Motors is Pakistan's largest car manufacturer. It is a 30 year 
partnership between Toyota and the Habib group, generates strong cash flow and 
is financially very conservative. We sold our investment, banking (modest) 
gains as we are concerned by the economic environment. Indus Motors imports a 
significant proportion of its components and the Pakistani Rupee is rarely a 
long term winner especially if global inflation is rising and oil prices are 
high. We would be keen to own the business again if the price gave a suitably 
wide margin of error for the economic risks. 
 
Reduced 
 
The three most significant reductions were in businesses listed in India. 
Although we think India perhaps has a great number of quality businesses than 
any other emerging market, valuations have become increasingly stretched. 
Towards the end of the year a tech bubble inflated as enthusiastic local 
investors bet on new listings - "growth at any price" has been a popular 
(though incoherent) investment mantra of late and India has not been spared. 
 
We reduced Cyient due to valuation. It is an engineering outsourcing business 
with global clients in industries such as aerospace and transportation. The CEO 
today is the son of the founder. It made some recent acquisitions which 
appeared to be disappointing initially although these have now started to 
perform better. 
 
Tata Consumer Products is a food and beverages company with a focus on tea and 
coffee. We reported reductions in the last two Annual Reports and the last two 
Interim Reports. We have trimmed further based on valuation. As discussed 
previously we believe that the original investment case remains intact, namely 
the importance of a recent management transition and a renewed focus on India 
under Tata Group stewardship, but that the company's transformation will take a 
long time. 
 
Sundaram Finance is a finance company with a focus on commercial vehicles. We 
made a small reduction on valuation. 
 
Demerger 
 
Shareholders may notice a new name in the holdings list of Aclara Resources. 
This is not a new purchase but the result of Hochschild Mining demerging its 
rare-earth elements project. It is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange but its 
sole asset is in Chile. It is unquestionably a risky investment by our 
conservative standards but we are happy staking a very small portion of the 
Trust's NAV on a conceptual project. We can only do this because we have some 
faith in the major shareholder (Eduardo Hochschild) and because we see Chile as 
an acceptable mining jurisdiction - it may have some bureaucracy but it is not 
corrupt. Rare-earth elements have a range of industry uses in growing sectors 
such as rechargeable batteries and very little of the world's supply is 
currently outside China - both are points which could make Aclara attractive. 
 
Post script 4 March 2022: we note the situation in Ukraine. St Andrews Partners 
has never owned companies operating at the "commanding heights" of the Russian 
economy (oil, gas, metals, finance, telecoms, etc), nor have we owned 
state-owned businesses in Russia. We are following the changing situation 
closely. We are hoping for a swift and peaceful outcome. 
 
Contribution 
 
During 2021 the Trust's NAV increased by 8.2%. The MSCI Emerging Markets Small 
Cap Index increased by 11.1%, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex Asia Index increased 
by 4.4%, and the MSCI Emerging Markets Index decreased by 3.7%. Contributors 
and detractors are discussed below. 
 
Positive 
 
Cyient is an Indian research and development provider with global clients in 
aerospace and transportation. We discussed it as a detractor in the 2020 Annual 
Report after a period in which its aerospace customers had struggled. 
Furthermore some of its recent acquisitions had appeared disappointing. In 
2021, it enjoyed a rebound in operations and investors seem to have 
over-rewarded signs that some of its acquisitions are improving. We have 
reduced our shareholding during the year on valuation, as discussed above, but 
continue to back it on account of the stewardship from the founding family, 
including the CEO who is the son of the founder, its high quality franchise, 
hard currency earnings and net cash balance sheet. 
 
Prodia Widyahusada is an Indonesian medical diagnostics business. It was 
reported as a new purchase in the Interim Report and has not been owned for the 
full year. We have been fortunate with the timing of our investment. During the 
year it reported strong results linked to the introduction of new services such 
as drive-in and teleconsultation, and strong demand for its tests, some of 
which have a role in testing for coronavirus. Our investment case is not based 
on the pandemic but based on the company's record of quality, economies of 
scale as it grows, and a strong social license. 
 
Reunert is a South African conglomerate consisting of three businesses, a 
cables business, an office equipment business, and an electrical engineering 
business. We discussed this in the Interim Report but it has reported strong 
results and an attractive dividend despite reduced economic activity in South 
Africa. 
 
City Lodge Hotels is a Hotel chain owner and operator in South Africa, Botswana 
and Kenya. We reported this company as a top detractor in the 2020 Annual 
Report. Although in 2021 it appears as a contributor as economies start to 
re-open, we note that it is still a detractor since first investment in late 
2019. We were attracted to the company because it was profitable and free cash 
flow generative even at historically low occupancy levels (50-60%) - although 
it took a 'direct hit' from Covid, it was this level of background 
profitability that meant it survived at all. We supported a rights issue in 
2020. 
 
Quiñenco is a Chilean holding company controlled by the Luksic family with 
assets in banking, beverages and shipping. Shareholders in the UK may know the 
Luksic family better for their controlling stake in Antofagasta, a copper 
mining company listed in London. Over long periods they have been successful in 
a number of joint ventures with partners such as Heineken, Citibank and Kuehne 
+ Nagel. They also have a fantastic record of buying and selling stakes in 
cyclical businesses as well as building them. One recent and relevant example 
of their time horizon at work is their purchase of a shipping company called 
CSAV (known as "Vapores") from near bankruptcy in 2011. Since then Quiñenco 
have raised capital, rehabilitated the company and merged it into Hapag-Lloyd. 
2021 has seen very positive results from Vapores and allowed Quiñenco to pay a 
special dividend, representing an approximate 10% yield. The company describes 
this dividend as a payment following a "10-year journey" - shipping rates 
remain high and we hope for further large dividends. 
 
Top Ten Contributors - Year ended 31 December 2021 
 
Company                Country of Listing Contribution to Return % 
 
Cyient                 India              2.45 
 
Prodia Widyahusada*    Indonesia          2.00 
 
Reunert                South Africa       1.81 
 
City Lodge Hotels      South Africa       1.64 
 
Quiñenco               Chile              1.55 
 
Tata Consumer Products India              1.15 
 
Sundaram Finance       India              0.93 
 
Brac Bank              Bangladesh         0.90 
 
Integrated Diagnostics United Kingdom     0.87 
 
RCL Foods**            South Africa       0.79 
 
* Company not held at start of period 
 
** Company not held at end of period 
 
Negative 
 
Philippine Seven is a 7-Eleven convenience franchise operating in the 
Philippines. We reported this as a detractor in the last Annual Report and 
discussed it in the last Interim Report. It is particularly sensitive to local 
movement restrictions as the bulk of its locations are in urban and business 
locations - commuters and office workers are key customers. We are relaxed that 
one day restrictions will ease but in the meantime the company continues to 
evolve - rejigging some store formats and locations to reflect that some habits 
may permanently have changed. The business has a good balance sheet and a 
supportive major shareholder (the Taiwanese company, President Chain Store). As 
a result the period of 'hibernation' for many of its shops has not impaired 
decision making. 
 
IAM Chile is a holding company with a 50% stake in Aguas Andinas, Chile's 
largest water utility. We discussed this as a detractor in the Interim Report 
and earlier in this report in relation to uncertainty in Chile around 
constitutional reform and adding to our investment. 
 
Grupo Herdez is a Mexico listed foods business, 50% owned by the Hernandez-Pons 
family and in its fourth generation. It is structured with 100% ownership of an 
ice-cream business and series of longstanding 50:50 joint ventures with 
multinational brands such as McCormick (jams and teas), Barilla (pasta) and 
Hormel (branded foods). We reported this company as a contributor in 2020 and 
it appears as a detractor in 2021. During this two year period we don't believe 
there have been changes in the fundamental qualities of the business. We 
continue to admire its ability to establish multi-decade long relationships 
with high quality multinational partners. It has a conservative track record 
and strong market share in a wide range of categories. The company has bought 
back a significant portion of its own stock in the last two years - we enjoy it 
when families with good long-term track records repurchase shares. 
 
Bank OCBC Nisp is a local Indonesian subsidiary of Singaporean bank OCBC. Our 
investment case here is based on the strength of the combined ownership from 
its Singapore based parent OCBC and the local Surjaudaja family who founded the 
bank and are involved in management today. Of note they refuse to take balance 
sheet risk with families who defaulted during the Asian Financial Crisis. OCBC 
Nisp has a decent track record over the last few years but its conservative 
stance means that loan growth and therefore profit growth has been sluggish - 
state owned banks are falling over themselves to lend, making margins 
unattractive for a rational player such as OCBC Nisp. In the long-term state 
owned banks tend to come a cropper, and in any event, OCBC Nisp has been 
working hard to increase non-loan revenue - the OCBC brand is strong in wealth 
management for example. 
 
Guaranty Trust Bank is a Nigerian bank, with a proven and long-serving 
management team. It was weak over the period as it continued to navigate 
difficult economic conditions. During 2021, the bank completed its transition 
into a holding company structure, which will allow it to see new opportunities 
in very under-penetrated businesses such as payments, pensions and asset 
management. The Bank survived the 2009 banking crisis in Nigeria and the 2016 - 
2017 devaluation with flying colours so has clear and recent proof of 
conservatism. As noted in note 2 below, we are applying a discount to the value 
of our Nigerian holdings due to difficulties in repatriation of Naira to hard 
currency. 
 
Top Ten Detractors - Year ended 31 December 2021 
 
Company                             Country of Listing     Contribution to Return 
                                                                                % 
 
Philippine Seven                    Philippines                             -1.49 
 
IAM Chile                           Chile                                   -1.06 
 
Grupo Herdez                        Mexico                                  -1.01 
 
Bank OCBC Nisp                      Indonesia                               -0.85 
 
Guaranty Trust Bank                 Nigeria                                 -0.77 
 
CAP Nigeria                         Nigeria                                 -0.61 
 
NESR*                               USA                                     -0.59 
 
Hochschild Mining                   United Kingdom                          -0.43 
 
Anadolu Efes*                       Turkey                                  -0.37 
 
Concepcion Industrial               Philippines                             -0.26 
 
* Not held at start of period 
 
For further information contact: 
 
Stewart Investors 
 
Investment Manager 
 
Tel:  0131 473 2900 
 
Juniper Partners Limited 
 
Company Secretary 
 
Tel:  0131 378 0500 
 
The Income Statement, Statement of Financial Position, Statement of Changes in 
Equity and Cash Flow Statement follow. 
 
Income Statement 
 
                          Year ended 31 December 2021     Year ended 31 December 2020 
 
                              Revenue   Capital           Revenue   Capital 
 
                               return    return   Total    return    return       Total 
 
                                £'000     £'000   £'000     £'000     £'000       £'000 
 
Income 
 
Investment income               2,061         -   2,061       872         -         872 
 
Gains/(losses) on                   -     3,010   3,010         -     (424)       (424) 
investments held at fair 
value through profit or 
loss 
 
Foreign exchange                    -      (36)    (36)         -         8           8 
(losses)/gains 
 
Total income                    2,061     2,974   5,035       872     (416)         456 
 
Expenses                        (740)         -   (740)     (624)         -       (624) 
 
Profit/(loss) before            1,321     2,974   4,295       248     (416)       (168) 
taxation 
 
Taxation                        (285)     (242)   (527)      (70)     (380)       (450) 
 
Profit/(loss) for the           1,036     2,732   3,768       178     (796)       (618) 
year 
 
Return/(loss) per share         1.94p     5.10p   7.04p     0.33p   (1.49p)     (1.16p) 
 
 
The Total column of this statement represents the Statement of Comprehensive 
Income of the Company. The Revenue return and Capital return columns are 
supplementary to this and are prepared under guidance issued by the Association 
of Investment Companies. 
 
All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing 
operations. 
 
Return/(loss) per share is calculated on 53,533,770 shares (2020: 53,533,770), 
being the weighted average number in issue during the year. 
 
Statement of Financial Position 
 
                                                        As at               As at 
                                             31 December 2021    31 December 2020 
 
                                                        £'000               £'000 
 
Non-current assets 
 
Investments held at fair value                         48,677              44,720 
through profit or loss 
 
Current assets 
 
Receivables                                               173                 271 
 
Cash and cash equivalents                               1,436               1,504 
 
                                                        1,609               1,775 
 
Current liabilities 
 
Payables                                                (204)               (205) 
 
Net current assets                                      1,405               1,570 
 
Non-current liabilities 
 
Deferred tax liability on Indian                        (350)               (326) 
capital gains 
 
Net assets                                             49,732              45,964 
 
Capital and reserves 
 
Ordinary share capital                                    535                 535 
 
Share premium                                           3,133               3,133 
 
Special reserve                                        49,315              49,315 
 
Capital reserve                                       (4,202)             (6,934) 
 
Revenue reserve                                           951                (85) 
 
Total equity                                           49,732              45,964 
 
                                                   53,533,770          53,533,770 
Shares in issue at year end 
 
                                                       92.90p              85.86p 
Net asset value per Ordinary share 
 
 
Statement of Changes in Equity 
 
For the year ended         Ordinary      Share   Special   Capital   Revenue 
31 December 2021      share capital    premium   reserve   reserve   reserve 
                                                                                 Total 
 
                              £'000      £'000     £'000     £'000     £'000     £'000 
 
Balance at 31                   535      3,133    49,315   (6,934)      (85)    45,964 
December 2020 
 
Profit for the year               -          -         -     2,732     1,036     3,768 
 
Balance at 31                   535      3,133    49,315   (4,202)       951    49,732 
December 2021 
 
 
 
For the year ended        Ordinary      Share   Special   Capital   Revenue 
31 December 2020             share    premium   reserve   reserve   reserve 
                           capital                                              Total 
 
                             £'000      £'000     £'000     £'000     £'000     £'000 
 
Balance at 31 December         535      3,133    49,315   (6,138)     (263)    46,582 
2019 
 
Loss for the year                -          -         -     (796)       178     (618) 
 
Balance at 31 December         535      3,133    49,315   (6,934)      (85)    45,964 
2020 
 
Share premium. The share premium represents the difference between the nominal 
value of new Ordinary shares issued and the consideration the Company receives 
for these shares. This is a non-distributable reserve. 
 
Special reserve. Created from the Court cancellation of the share premium 
account which had arisen from premiums paid on the Ordinary shares at launch. 
Available as distributable profits to be used for the buy back of shares. The 
cost of any shares bought back is deducted from this reserve. The cost of any 
shares resold from treasury is added back to this reserve. This is a 
distributable reserve. 
 
Capital reserve. Gains and losses on the realisation of investments, realised 
exchange differences of a capital nature and returns of capital are accounted 
for in this reserve. Increases and decreases in the valuation of investments 
held at the year end, and unrealised exchange differences of a capital nature 
are also accounted for in this reserve. The realised portion of this reserve is 
distributable. 
 
Revenue reserve. Any surplus/deficit arising from the revenue profit/loss for 
the year is taken to/from this reserve. This is a distributable reserve. 
 
Cash Flow Statement 
 
                                                           Year ended      Year ended 
                                                          31 December     31 December 
 
                                                                 2021            2020 
 
                                                                £'000           £'000 
 
Net cash outflow from operations before dividends,              (642)           (679) 
interest, purchases and sales 
 
Dividends received from investments                             2,060             859 
 
Interest from deposits                                              -               1 
 
Purchases of investments                                     (13,862)        (14,823) 
 
Sales of investments                                           12,915          12,074 
 
Cash inflow/(outflow) from operations                             471         (2,568) 
 
Taxation                                                        (503)           (124) 
 
Net cash outflow from operating activities                       (32)         (2,692) 
 
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents                            (32)         (2,692) 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at the start of the year              1,504           4,188 
 
Effect of currency (losses)/gains                                (36)               8 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year                1,436           1,504 
 
 
Principal Risks and Risk Management 
 
The Board has carried out a careful assessment of the principal and emerging 
risks facing the Company, these risks, together with a summary of the 
mitigating action the Board takes to manage these risks, are set out below. 
 
Emerging Risks - Environmental, Social & Governance ("ESG") factors 
 
Risk                                 Mitigation 
 
Failure to consider the impact of    ESG is fully embedded within the Investment 
ESG factors adversely affects the    Manager's investment strategy, please refer to 
Company's reputation and financial   pages 14 and 15 of the Annual Report for a full 
performance.                         description of the Investment Manager's 
                                     approach to ESG factors. 
 
                                     The Board provides regular challenge to the 
                                     Investment Manager in respect of their approach 
                                     to ESG, and receives updates in respect of the 
New specific risk identified in year changing ESG disclosure requirements. 
 
Principal Risks 
 
Risk                                 Mitigation 
 
Investment objective and strategy 
An inappropriate or unattractive     The Board conducts an annual strategy reviews 
objective and strategy may have an   and consider investment performance, 
adverse effect on Shareholder        shareholder views and developments in the 
returns or cause a reduction in      marketplace as well as emerging risks which 
demand for the Company's shares,     could impact the Company. 
both of which could lead to a 
widening discount.                   The Board reviews changes to the shareholder 
                                     register at quarterly Board meetings and 
                                     engages the Administrator to continually 
                                     monitor the discount at which the Company's 
                                     shares trade, reporting regularly to the Board 
                                     and buying back shares when appropriate. 
No change to this risk 
 
Investment performance 
Poor investment performance may have The Board reviews investment performance at 
an adverse effect on Shareholder     each quarterly Board meeting. The Investment 
returns.                             Manager reports on the Company's performance, 
                                     transaction activity, individual holdings, 
                                     portfolio characteristics and outlook. 
 
                                     Investment performance and the portfolio 
                                     composition has been monitored specifically in 
                                     light of the Covid-19 pandemic. 
 
                                     The Investment Manager is formally appraised at 
                                     least annually by the Management Engagement 
                                     Committee. 
 
No change to this risk 
 
Financial and Economic 
The Company's investments are        The Board regularly reviews and agrees policies 
impacted by financial and economic   for managing market price risk, interest rate 
factors including market prices,     risk, foreign currency risk, liquidity risk and 
interest rates, foreign exchange     credit risk. These are explained in detail in 
rates, liquidity and credit which    note 13 to the financial statements on pages 37 
could cause losses to the investment to 43 of the Annual Report. The Board 
portfolio.                           recognises that macro-economic and geopolitical 
                                     factors may impact the Company's portfolio. 
                                     However, other than being aware of such events 
No change to this risk               there is little that the Board can do to 
                                     mitigate against these events. 
 
Operational 
The Company is reliant on third      Operationally, Covid-19 is affecting each of 
party service providers including    the Company's key service providers and each 
Stewart Investors as Investment      has put in place the appropriate arrangements 
Manager, Juniper Partners as Company for their staff to work from home should 
Secretary and Administrator, J P     government guidance 
Morgan as Depositary and Custodian   require. To date these services have continued 
and Computershare as Registrar.      without disruption and the operational 
Failure of the internal control      arrangements have proven adequate. The Board 
systems of these third parties could will continue to monitor these arrangements. 
result in inaccurate information 
being reported or risk to the        The Audit Committee formally reviews each 
Company's assets.                    service provider at least annually, considering 
                                     their reports on internal controls. 
 
                                     Further details of the Company's internal 
                                     control and risk management system is provided 
                                     on pages 58 and 59 of the Annual Report. 
No change to this risk 
 
Regulatory 
The Company operates in a regulatory Compliance with relevant regulations is 
environment. Failure to comply with  monitored on an ongoing basis by the Company 
s1158 of the Corporation Tax Act     Secretary and Investment Manager who report 
2010 could result in the Company     regularly to the Board. 
losing investment trust status and 
being subject to tax on capital      The Board monitors changes in the regulatory 
gains. Failure to comply with other  environment and receives regulatory updates 
regulations could result in          from the Company Secretary, Lawyers and 
financial penalties or the           Auditors as relevant. 
suspension of the Company's listing 
on the London Stock Exchange.        The Board has been updated on any regulatory 
                                     changes proposed in respect of the response to 
                                     the Covid-19 pandemic as required. 
No change to this risk 
 
Statement of Directors' Responsibilities in Respect of the Annual Financial 
Report 
 
In accordance with the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, we confirm 
that to the best of our knowledge: 
 
  * The financial statements contained within the Annual Report for the year 
    ended 31 December 2021, of which this statement of results is an extract, 
    have been prepared in accordance with applicable United Kingdom Generally 
    Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards, 
    comprising FRS 102, and applicable law), give a true and fair view of the 
    assets, liabilities, financial position and net loss of the Company; and 
 
  * The Strategic Report includes a fair review of the development and 
    performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with 
    a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces. 
 
In addition, each of the Directors considers that the Annual Report, taken as a 
whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information 
necessary for shareholders to assess the Company's performance, position, 
business model and strategy. 
 
Going Concern 
 
The Directors believe, in the light of the controls and review processes 
reported in the Report of the Audit Committee on page 58 of the Annual Report 
and bearing in mind the nature of the Company's business and assets, which are 
considered to be readily realisable if required, that the Company has adequate 
resources to continue operating for at least twelve months from the date of 
approval of the financial statements. For this reason, they continue to adopt 
the going concern basis in preparing the accounts. 
 
Related Party Transactions 
 
Related party transactions with the Directors, for the year ended 31 December 
2021 are disclosed in the Directors' Report on page 46 of the Annual Report. At 
the year end no amounts were due to the Directors (2020: nil). 
 
The AIFM, the Investment Manager and the Company have entered into the 
Investment Management Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Investment 
Management Agreement, the AIFM has delegated to Stewart Investors the 
management of the Company's portfolio subject to its and the Directors' overall 
supervision. Details of transactions during the year are disclosed in note 3 of 
the Annual Report. Amounts outstanding at the year end are shown in note 8 and 
note 9 of the Annual Report. 
 
There were no other related-party transactions. 
 
Notes: 
 
1.         ScotGems plc is a public company limited by shares, incorporated and 
domiciled in England and Wales, and carries on business as an investment 
trust.  Details of the Company's registered office can be found in the Annual 
Report. 
 
The accounts are prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006, United 
Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (Accounting Standards "UK GAAP") 
including Financial Reporting Standard (FRS) 102 "The Financial Reporting 
Standard applicable 
 
in the UK and Republic of Ireland" and the Statement of Recommended Practice 
"Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts" 
("the SORP") issued by the Association of Investment Companies in April 2021. 
 
All of the Company's operations are of a continuing nature. 
 
The accounts have been prepared on a going concern basis under the historical 
cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of investments held at fair 
value through profit or loss. 
 
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical 
experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are 
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. 
 
The following areas are considered to involve a higher degree of judgement or 
complexity: 
 
Investment valuation 
 
The Company's AIFM is responsible for ensuring that investments are held at 
fair value, and may make adjustments in the absence of a market price or where 
strong evidence exists that the market price or price provided by the pricing 
source does not represent a fair value for the security. A discount of 35% was 
applied to investments in Nigeria, and a discount of 5% was applied to 
investments in Sri Lanka at 31 December 2021. Please refer to note 2 below for 
further details. 
 
The accounts have also been prepared on the assumption that approval as an 
investment trust will continue to be granted. 
 
The functional and reporting currency of the Company is pounds sterling as most 
investors in the Company are based in the United Kingdom. 
 
2. Fair Value Hierarchy 
 
The fair value hierarchy used to analyse the fair values of financial assets 
and liabilities are described below. 
 
The levels are determined by the lowest (that is, the least reliable or least 
independently observable) level of input that is significant to the fair value 
measurement for the individual investment in its entirety as follows: 
 
Level 1 - investments with prices quoted in an active market; 
 
Level 2 - investments whose fair value is based directly on observable current 
market prices or is indirectly being derived from market prices; and 
 
Level 3 - investments whose fair value is determined using a valuation 
technique based on assumptions that are not supported by observable current 
market prices or are not based on observable market data. 
 
The table below provides an analysis of financial assets and financial 
liabilities based on the fair value hierarchy described above. Short term 
balances are excluded from the table as their carrying value at the reporting 
date approximates to their fair value. 
 
The Company held the following categories of financial instruments as at 31 
December 2021: 
 
                               Level 1     Level 2   Level 3      Total 
 
                                 £'000       £'000     £'000      £'000 
 
As at December 2021 
 
Listed equities                 46,701       1,976         -     48,677 
 
Total                           46,701       1,976         -     48,677 
 
Level 2 investments are based indirectly upon quoted market prices. The Fair 
Value Pricing Committee at the AIFM (who are independent from the Investment 
Manager) assess whether market prices represent fair value, based on a number 
of factors. 
 
Nigeria 
 
The Central Bank of Nigeria sets the official exchange rate. The Fair Value 
Pricing Committee believes that significant delays with repatriation are 
evidence that the official exchange rate does not reflect fair value. At 31 
December 2021 a discount of 35% was applied to all Nigerian assets. This 
discount is generated daily using the ratio of an observable parallel rate to 
the official exchange rate. At 31 December 2021 the carrying value of Nigerian 
investments (after applying the discount) was £1,467,000 (2020: £2,413,000). 
 
Sri Lanka 
 
There have been delays in repatriation of cash from Sri Lanka which the Fair 
Value Pricing Committee believes is evidence that the exchange rate does not 
represent fair value. At 31 December 2021 a discount of 5% was applied to all 
Sri Lankan assets. The 5% discount is the ratio of an interbank rate to the 
official rate, whilst this interbank rate was in use during the year. At 31 
December 2021 the carrying value of Sri Lankan investments (after applying the 
discount) was £509,000 (2020: £495,000, however no discount was applied at 31 
December 2020, therefore this value is included in Level 1 listed equities). 
 
The Company held the following categories of financial instruments as at 31 
December 2020: 
 
                               Level 1     Level 2   Level 3      Total 
 
                                 £'000       £'000     £'000      £'000 
 
As at December 2020 
 
Listed equities                 42,307       2,413         -     44,720 
 
Total                           42,307       2,413         -     44,720 
 
3. 
 
                                                   Year ended 31     Year ended 
                                                   December 2021    31 December 
                                                                           2020 
 
Reconciliation of profit/(loss) before taxation            £'000          £'000 
to net cash outflow before dividends, interest, 
purchases and sales 
 
Net profit/(loss) on activities before finance             4,295          (168) 
costs and taxation 
 
Net (gains)/losses on investments                        (3,010)            424 
 
Currency losses/(gains)                                       36            (8) 
 
Investment income                                        (2,061)          (872) 
 
Decrease in other payables                                   (1)            (3) 
 
Decrease/(increase) in prepayments and other                  99           (52) 
receivables 
 
Net cash outflow from operations before                    (642)          (679) 
dividends, interest, purchases and sales 
 
4. These are not statutory accounts in terms of Section 434 of the Companies 
Act 2006.  Full audited accounts for the year to 31 December 2021 will be sent 
to shareholders in March 2022 and will be available for inspection at Broadgate 
Tower, 20 Primrose Street, London EC2A 2EW, the registered office of the 
Company. The full annual report and accounts will be available on the Company's 
website www.scotgems.com. 
 
5. The audited accounts for the year ended 31 December 2021 will be lodged with 
the Registrar of Companies. 
 
 
 
END 
 
 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

March 11, 2022 02:00 ET (07:00 GMT)

Scotgems (LSE:SGEM)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Abr 2024 até Mai 2024 Click aqui para mais gráficos Scotgems.
Scotgems (LSE:SGEM)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Mai 2023 até Mai 2024 Click aqui para mais gráficos Scotgems.