| | |
| REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE |
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Board of Directors has appointed an Audit Committee presently composed of four directors, Mss. Blank, Larocca, and Spark and Mr. Johnson. Each of the directors is independent as defined in the Nasdaq rules. The Board of Directors has determined that Mss. Blank and Spark are each an “audit committee financial expert” (as defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act).
The Audit Committee’s responsibility is one of oversight as set forth in its charter, which is available in the Investors section of our website at ir.agnc.com/corporate-governance-documents. It is not the duty of the Audit Committee to prepare our financial statements, to plan or conduct audits, or to determine that our financial statements are complete and accurate and are in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our management is responsible for preparing our financial statements and for maintaining internal controls. The independent auditors are responsible for auditing the financial statements and for expressing an opinion as to whether those audited financial statements fairly present our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited consolidated financial statements with management and with Ernst & Young LLP, our independent auditors for 2022.
The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Audit Committee has received from Ernst & Young LLP the written statements required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Rule No. 3526, “Communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence,” and has discussed Ernst & Young LLP’s independence with Ernst & Young LLP, and has considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the auditor’s independence.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022 be included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Audit Committee has approved the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2023 and has directed that the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP be submitted to our stockholders for ratification.
By the Audit Committee:
Donna J. Blank, Chair
Andrew A. Johnson, Jr.
Prue B. Larocca
Frances R. Spark
| | | | | |
20 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
| | |
| PROPOSAL 5: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION ELIMINATING SUPERMAJORITY VOTING REQUIREMENTS |
PROPOSAL 5:
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION ELIMINATING SUPERMAJORITY VOTING REQUIREMENTS
General Information
As part of our ongoing review and evaluation of our corporate governance practices, in 2022 the Board considered the advantages and disadvantages of the supermajority voting provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation. At that time, the Board considered that supermajority voting provisions can facilitate corporate governance stability by requiring broad stockholder support in order to effect fundamental changes. However, many investors and others believe that supermajority voting provisions conflict with principles of good corporate governance because the provisions may limit a board’s responsiveness and accountability to stockholders and restrict stockholder participation in corporate governance matters. After considering the advantages and disadvantages of the supermajority voting provisions and evaluating stockholder positions on the issue, the Board recommended that stockholders adopt certain amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to replace the supermajority voting requirements with a majority voting standard at our 2022 Annual Meeting. While the proposal received overwhelming support from stockholders casting a ballot at the 2022 Annual Meeting, the necessary vote to approve the amendments was not reached, and the proposals were not approved.
At a meeting held on January 26, 2023, our Board again considered the Company’s corporate governance practices and the interests of stockholders in relation to the supermajority voting provisions included in our Certificate of Incorporation. The Board also reviewed the vote results from the 2022 Annual Meeting, and following this review, the Board is again recommending that stockholders at our 2023 Annual Meeting adopt certain amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to replace the supermajority voting requirements with a majority voting standard. The Company will again engage D.F. King to assist in the solicitation of proxies in an effort to reach the required vote for approval of this Proposal 5.
Our Certificate of Incorporation currently includes supermajority voting requirements for amendments to certain provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation, amendments to our Bylaws, and removal of directors with or without cause. The Board is again this year submitting the proposed amendments as three proposals for approval at the Annual Meeting, as described below. Stockholders will vote on Proposals 5A, 5B, and 5C separately, and the approval of each proposal is not conditioned on the approval of the other proposals. The proposed amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation would become effective upon the filing of a Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of Delaware, which we would file promptly following the Annual Meeting if our stockholders approve the amendments.
Proposal 5A: Amendment to Eliminate the Supermajority Voting Standard for Certain Amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation
Article XII of our Certificate of Incorporation currently provides that the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66% of the shares of all classes of capital stock then entitled to vote shall be required to amend, repeal, or adopt any provision inconsistent with Article V of the Certificate of Incorporation. Article V relates to the Company’s Board of Directors and includes provisions regarding the number, election, term, removal, and vacancies of directors and general powers of the Board. Proposal 5A requests that stockholders approve an amendment to delete the final sentence of Article XII requiring a supermajority vote. As a result of this amendment, the voting standard for amending any provision inconsistent with Article V would be the same standard as for amendments to other provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and would require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all the shares of the Company’s capital stock then entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. This majority vote requirement reflects the default voting standard under the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) for certificate of incorporation amendments.
The proposed amendment to Article XII also conforms certain language describing the voting standard in that Article to Section 5.5 to ensure identical language is used to describe the same voting standard throughout our Certificate of Incorporation.
The full text of the proposed amendment, marked to show the proposed deletion and insertion, is set forth in Appendix A of this proxy statement. The general description above of the amended provision on certain amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation is a summary and should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the full text of the proposed amendment attached as Appendix A.
Proposal 5B: Amendment to Eliminate the Supermajority Voting Standard for Amendments to Our Bylaws
Article XI of our Certificate of Incorporation currently provides that stockholders may only adopt, amend, alter, change, or repeal the Bylaws of the Company by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66% of all classes of the Company’s capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. Proposal 5B requests that stockholders approve an amendment to Article XI to provide that stockholders may adopt, amend, alter, change, or repeal the Bylaws of the Company by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all the shares of the Company’s capital stock then entitled to vote generally in the election of directors.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 21 |
| | |
| PROPOSAL 5: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION ELIMINATING SUPERMAJORITY VOTING REQUIREMENTS |
The proposed amendment to Article XI also conforms certain language describing the voting standard in that Article to Section 5.5 to ensure identical language is used to describe the same voting standard throughout our Certificate of Incorporation.
The full text of the proposed amendment, marked to show the proposed deletions and insertions, is set forth in Appendix B of this proxy statement. The general description above of the amended provision on amendment of the Company’s Bylaws is a summary and should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the full text of the proposed amendment attached as Appendix B.
Proposal 5C: Amendment to Eliminate the Supermajority Voting Standard for Removal of Directors
Currently, Section 5.5 of our Certificate of Incorporation provides that stockholders may remove any director or the entire Board from office at any time with or without cause only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66% of all shares of the capital stock of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. Proposal 5C requests that stockholders approve an amendment to this standard to provide that stockholders may remove directors with or without cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of all the shares of the Company’s capital stock then entitled to vote generally in the election of directors. This majority vote requirement reflects the default voting standard under the DGCL.
The full text of the proposed amendment, marked to show the proposed deletions and insertions, is set forth in Appendix C of this proxy statement. The general description above of the amended provision on removal of directors is a summary and should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the full text of the proposed amendment attached as Appendix C.
As previously determined by the Board and announced by the Company, if Proposal 5C is not approved by the stockholders, the Company would continue not to enforce the supermajority voting requirement for the removal of directors reflected in Section 5.5 and will instead, to the extent permitted by law, allow such action, if any, to be determined under a majority voting standard.
Conclusion and Recommendation; Vote Required
The Board is submitting and recommending the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation to replace supermajority voting provisions with a majority voting standard. The approval of Proposals 5A, 5B, and 5C each requires the affirmative vote by the holders of 66% of all shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes have the same effect as voting against Proposals 5A, 5B, or 5C. The Board believes that Proposals 5A, 5B, and 5C are each in our best interests and in the best interests of the stockholders and has unanimously approved the proposed amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF PROPOSALS 5A, 5B, AND 5C TO AMEND THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO REPLACE SUPERMAJORITY VOTING REQUIREMENTS WITH A MAJORITY VOTING STANDARD.
| | | | | |
22 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT
Executive Officer Biographies
The Board generally elects officers annually following our annual meeting of stockholders to serve until the meeting of the Board following the next annual meeting. Set forth below is certain information about each executive officer as of February 24, 2023. The business address of each executive officer is c/o AGNC Investment Corp., 2 Bethesda Metro Center, 12th Floor, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.
PETER J. FEDERICO, 56
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Federico has served as a Director and as our Chief Executive Officer since July 2021 and as our President since March 2018. He previously served as our Chief Operating Officer from March 2018 until July 2021, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from July 2016 until March 2018, and Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer from June 2011 until July 2016. Further information about Mr. Federico may be found under “Proposal 1: Election of Directors-Director Nominee Biographies and Qualifications” of this proxy statement.
GARY D. KAIN, 58
Director, Executive Chair
Mr. Kain has served as a Director since 2016 and as our Executive Chair since July 2021. He previously served as our Chief Executive Officer from March 2016 through July 2021, Chief Investment Officer from January 2009 through July 2021, and President from April 2011 until March 2018. Further information about Mr. Kain may be found under “Proposal 1: Election of Directors-Director Nominee Biographies and Qualifications” of this proxy statement.
CHRISTOPHER J. KUEHL, 49
Executive Vice President, Agency Portfolio Investments and Chief Investment Officer
Mr. Kuehl has served as our Chief Investment Officer since July 2021 and as an Executive Vice President since November 2016. He was previously a Senior Vice President from March 2012 through October 2016.
Prior to joining AGNC Investment Corp., Mr. Kuehl served as Vice President of Mortgage Investments & Structuring of Freddie Mac. In this capacity, Mr. Kuehl was responsible for directing Freddie Mac’s purchases, sales, and structuring activities for all MBS products, including fixed-rate mortgages, ARMs, and CMOs. Prior to joining Freddie Mac in 2000, Mr. Kuehl was a Portfolio Manager with TeleBank/Etrade Bank.
BERNICE E. BELL, 51
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Ms. Bell has served as our Executive Vice President since January 2022 and Chief Financial Officer since March 2018. Ms. Bell previously served as Senior Vice President from January 2016 to January 2022, Chief Accounting Officer from January 2016 to March 2018, Vice President from April 2011 to January 2016, and as our Controller from 2008 through December 2015.
Prior to joining AGNC Investment Corp., Ms. Bell served as the Vice President and Controller of American Capital, Ltd. from July 2003 to December 2009. Prior to joining American Capital, Ms. Bell was the Vice President and Controller of certain privately-held companies engaged in the business of telecommunications and software development from July 1998 to June 2003 and was with the accounting firm Price Waterhouse, LLP from July 1994 to June 1998.
KENNETH L. POLLACK, 55
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and Secretary
Mr. Pollack has served as our Executive Vice President since January 2022 and our General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and Secretary since July 2016. Mr. Pollack previously served as Senior Vice President from July 2016 until January 2022.
Prior to joining AGNC Investment Corp., Mr. Pollack was Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of American Capital, Ltd. At American Capital, Mr. Pollack served as lead counsel for American Capital’s portfolio investment activities in the areas of Real Estate, U.S. Sponsor Finance, U.S. Buyouts, International Power, Special Situations, Operations, and Financial Restructuring.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 23 |
Mr. Pollack joined American Capital in 2004. Prior to American Capital, Mr. Pollack was an Associate in the Corporate and Securities and Real Estate Practice Groups of Arnold & Porter.
SEAN P. REID, 47
Executive Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development
Mr. Reid has served as our Executive Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development since January 2022. He previously served as Senior Vice President from July 2016 until January 2022 and as Senior Vice President, Corporate and Business Development for our former manager from August 2013 to July 2016.
Mr. Reid was previously a Vice President in the Washington, D.C. Buyouts group of American Capital, Ltd. and, prior to that, an Assistant General Counsel with American Capital’s in-house legal team. Prior to joining American Capital, Mr. Reid was an Associate in the Corporate & Securities practice group of Covington & Burling in Washington, D.C.
| | | | | |
24 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2022 NEOs
Our NEOs for 2022 are:
| | | | | |
| Name | Title |
Peter J. Federico | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Gary D. Kain | Executive Chair |
Christopher J. Kuehl | Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer |
Bernice E. Bell | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Kenneth L. Pollack | Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, and Secretary |
Executive Summary
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information on our executive compensation philosophy, objectives, structure, and our process for setting compensation for our named executive officers, or NEOs.
Business Overview
AGNC is a leading provider of private capital to the U.S. housing market, enhancing liquidity in the residential real estate mortgage markets and, in turn, facilitating home ownership in the U.S. AGNC is an internally managed REIT that invests predominantly in Agency residential mortgage-backed securities funded through a combination of equity capital and collateralized borrowings structured as repurchase agreements. We seek to provide investors with favorable long-term returns on a risk-adjusted basis through attractive monthly dividends, while maintaining the lowest operating cost structure among residential mortgage REITs. We generate income from the interest earned on our investment assets, net of associated borrowing and hedging costs, and net realized gains and losses on our investments and hedging activities. As such, our business operations are similar to investment managers that focus on fixed income investments, although we exclusively invest AGNC’s capital rather than third-party client funds.
Our Business in the Context of our Broader Industry
We are the second largest residential mortgage REIT overall by market capitalization, total assets, and total equity when compared to the 18 other residential-focused mortgage REITs included in The Bloomberg Mortgage REIT Index (BBREMTG) as of December 31, 2022, and we refer to these other 18 REITs collectively as the “Resi mREIT Universe.”1 Some of these 18 REITs have an investment focus similar to AGNC, but most of these REITs have strategies that place a greater emphasis on credit-sensitive assets than our portfolio. Moreover, many of the mortgage REITs in the Resi mREIT Universe are externally managed by a third party and pay the third party a management fee as a set percentage of equity (plus, in some cases, a performance incentive fee) in lieu of compensating employees directly. In an external management structure, the third-party manager, rather than the REIT, is responsible for the compensation and benefits of its executives and other employees, which are paid out of the management fee. As an internally managed REIT, AGNC is directly responsible for determining executive compensation and providing disclosure regarding its compensation philosophy and programs. We believe our internal management structure allows us to closely align our compensation programs to our and our stockholders’ long-term interests.
1. The residential mREIT universe is unweighted and includes AG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (“MITT”), Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (“NLY”), ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. (“ARR”), Chimera Investment Corporation (“CIM”), Dynex Capital, Inc. (“DX”), Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation (“CHMI”), Ellington Financial, Inc. (“EFC”), Ellington Residential Mortgage REIT (“EARN”), Great Ajax Corp. (“AJX”), Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (“IVR”), MFA Financial, Inc. (“MFA”), New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. (“NYMT”), Orchid Island Capital, Inc. ("ORC"), PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (“PMT”), Redwood Trust, Inc. (“RWT”), Rithm Capital Corp. (“RITM”), Two Harbors Investment Corp. (“TWO”), and Western Asset Mortgage Capital Corporation (“WMC”, and collectively, the “Resi mREIT Universe”).
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 25 |
AGNC seeks to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders and offers a track-record of industry leading financial performance and the lowest cost operating structure in the residential mortgage REIT industry. Our value proposition to stockholders includes five key aspects of our business:
1. Annualized total stock return is measured from AGNC’s IPO in 2008 through December 31, 2022. Total stock return over a period includes price appreciation and dividend reinvestment; dividends are assumed to be reinvested at the closing price of the security on the ex-dividend date. Source: Bloomberg.
2. AGNC’s operating cost structure is based on average stockholders’ equity for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2022; it includes compensation and benefits and general and administrative expenses.
3. Duration is shown as of December 31, 2022; it is a model estimate of interest rate sensitivity measured in years as of a single point in time. AGNC’s Net Duration Gap is a measure of the difference between the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and our liabilities, inclusive of interest rate hedges.
4. Hedge Ratio is shown as of December 31, 2022; it is measured as the ratio of interest rate swaps, swaptions, and net U.S. Treasury position to Agency repo, other debt, net TBA, and forward settling securities positions (at cost).
5. “Agency residential mortgage REIT” includes issuers with greater than 90% of capital invested in Agency MBS.
| | | | | |
26 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
| | |
| |
| 2022 Year in Review |
In 2022, financial markets endured a difficult transition resulting from the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) policy pivot from an extremely accommodative policy following the Pandemic and the associated economic impact to an aggressive tightening cycle to combat significant inflationary pressures. Interest rates across the yield curve rose materially as the Fed raised the Federal Funds rate by 4.25% in just nine months. The yield on ten-year U.S. Treasury securities rose by nearly 2.5%, generating a total return for these bonds of -15% in 2022, the worst annual performance in decades. In sharp market downturns, Agency MBS tend to initially underperform other fixed income asset classes, and 2022 was no exception. Agency MBS yield spreads to benchmark interest rates across all coupons reached historically wide levels, and the unlevered Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index total return for the year was -12%, its worst annual performance since the Index's inception in 1976.
Against this challenging macroeconomic backdrop, AGNC posted an economic return of -28.4%, comprised of $1.44 of dividends per common share and a $5.91 decrease in tangible net book value per common share. The Company maintained its dividend of $0.12 per common share per month without change despite these economic headwinds. Although AGNC modestly underperformed our Agency REIT Peer Group1 on an economic return basis in 2022 (-28.4 % for AGNC vs. -26.3% for our Agency REIT Peer Group), AGNC’s total stock return for the year materially exceeded the total stock return of the Agency REIT Peer Group (-22% for AGNC vs. -30% average for Agency REIT Peer Group members). AGNC's outperformance on a total stock return basis is even more notable over the three- and five-year horizons, in which it posted annualized total stock returns of -7% (versus -21% for the Agency REIT Peer Group average) and -2% (versus -14% for the Agency REIT Peer Group average), respectively. In addition, AGNC maintained the lowest operating expense ratio as a percentage of stockholders’ equity among residential mortgage REITs for the sixth consecutive year, comprising every full calendar year since AGNC’s internalization on July 1, 2016.2
In addition, bolstering our primary focus on generating favorable risk-adjusted returns for our stockholders, AGNC executed upon a number of strategic and operational initiatives in 2022 to enhance our franchise value, including numerous operational measures implemented to improve operating efficiency and risk management processes, capital activities including accretive common and preferred equity issuances and common stock repurchases, continued improvement of our ESG and sustainability disclosure and practices, and enhancements of our corporate communications and investor outreach initiatives. These activities are described in greater detail in our Strategic and Operational Review on page 35. |
1.Our Agency REIT Peer Group is unweighted and includes Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (“NLY”), ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. (“ARR”), Dynex Capital, Inc. (“DX”), Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (“IVR”), Orchid Island Capital, Inc. ("ORC"), and Two Harbors Investment Corp. (“TWO” and collectively, the “Agency REIT Peer Group”).
2.For mortgage REITs other than AGNC, cost structures are based on operating expenses and average stockholders’ equity (excluding noncontrolling interests, as applicable) over the applicable year as publicly reported by such REITs. Operating costs include expenses for compensation and benefits, management fees, incentive fees (if applicable), and G&A and may include one-time or nonrecurring expenses. Operating costs exclude direct costs associated with operating activities, such as loan acquisition costs, securitization costs, servicing expenses, etc. to the extent publicly disclosed by such REITs. AGNC’s cost structure is based on operating expenses for the applicable year and average stockholders’ equity. AGNC’s net operating expense ratio includes compensation and benefits and G&A, excludes non-cash amortization charges and nonrecurring cash expenses associated with the Company’s internalization in 2016, and was net of management fee income from MTGE Investment Corp. during the period of AGNC’s management of MTGE Investment Corp.
Despite the challenges faced in 2022, AGNC’s annualized total stock return since our IPO remains very favorable on an absolute basis at 10.1% and significantly exceeds the Bloomberg Mortgage REIT Index and relevant S&P 500 industry groups (Financials and Real Estate).
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 27 |
1. Total stock return is measured from AGNC’s IPO through December 31, 2022. Total stock return over a period includes price appreciation and dividend reinvestment; dividends are assumed to be reinvested at the closing price of the security on the ex-dividend date. Source: Bloomberg.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Compensation Program Objectives
The compensation programs for all of our employees, including our NEOs, are designed to focus on key strategic and financial objectives including:
| | | | | |
| | |
| Pay-for-Performance | Link compensation to achievement of short- and long-term financial and strategic goals |
| | |
| Attraction and Retention | Attract and retain a high-quality team with skills necessary to outperform industry peers and achieve AGNC’s strategic objectives |
| | |
| Alignment with Stockholders | Align the interests of executive officers, employees, and stockholders by tying elements of realized compensation to stockholder value |
| | |
| Financial Efficiency | Maintain a low-cost operating structure that maximizes financial efficiency from a tax, accounting, and cash flow perspective |
| | |
| Strong Compensation Governance | Employ high quality practices in governance of executive compensation |
| | | | | |
28 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
In support of these objectives, AGNC provides all of its employees total compensation in the form of base salary, annual performance-based incentives, and long-term incentive awards. The following describes the components of our NEO compensation program:
Stockholder Engagement
In 2022, 89% of our stockholders present or represented at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on the matter supported our advisory resolution on executive compensation, which we believe reflects the positive support for the construction of our executive compensation program after taking into account stockholder feedback.
We value regular engagement with our stockholders, including through our quarterly earnings calls, investor conferences, fall and spring engagement campaigns, and outreach through our Investor Relations department. We continued our robust program in 2022. Throughout the year, we participated in 11 investor conferences, including retail network calls hosted by research analysts, held over 125 meetings and calls with institutional investors, and responded to over 360 letters, emails, and calls from retail investors. We engaged with our retail investors through our Investor Relations Department and as facilitated through collaboration with our proxy solicitor. In the Fall of 2022, we sought meetings with our top 50 institutional stockholders, who collectively hold 81% of our institutionally held common stock, and the two largest proxy advisory firms to engage on governance related topics, including executive compensation. Most of our institutional investors and the two proxy advisory firms declined our request, noting that there
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 29 |
was no need to engage this year. Stockholders with whom we met expressed support for our governance initiatives and our approach to ESG disclosure and did not voice concerns about our executive compensation program.
We continuously work to improve our stockholder engagement efforts and value the feedback provided to us during this process. Engagement with our stockholders regarding our compensation policies and practices has played a significant role in the evolution of our compensation program.
Summary of Compensation Changes in 2022
The Compensation Committee continually evaluates our compensation program and considers stockholder feedback, industry trends, and comparative pay analysis. In 2021, the compensation packages for Messrs. Kain, Federico, and Kuehl were adjusted as a result of the promotion of Messrs. Federico and Kuehl to the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer, respectively, and Mr. Kain’s transition to the role of Executive Chair. Messrs. Federico and Kuehl each received increases in their target bonus levels and their target LTI in 2021 commensurate with their mid-year promotions. Although no changes were made to the target compensation of Messrs. Kain, Federico, and Kuehl in 2022, their annual target compensation changed relative to 2021 as 2022 compensation levels reflected a full-year of service in their new roles and with corresponding pay adjustments. Consequently, Mr. Federico’s target total direct compensation for 2021 was $7,000,000, and his target total direct compensation for 2022 was $9,000,000. Mr. Kain’s base salary, target bonus, and target LTI were reduced as a result of his transition to the role of Executive Chair of our Board and corresponding adjustment in his day-to-day responsibilities to the Company, though 67% of his LTI continues to be allocated to performance-based RSUs. Mr. Pollack and Ms. Bell were each promoted to Executive Vice President, and, after examining compensation practices at comparable companies and considering their roles and functions performed, the Compensation Committee also increased target annual compensation for them to the levels reflected in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Composition of NEO Compensation
The Compensation Committee believes that incentive compensation should be a substantial component of each executive’s total compensation package. In 2022 all executives received at least 40% of their total compensation in the form of LTI, with 67% of LTI awards at target being performance vesting. The charts demonstrate the pay mix for our NEOs in 2022:
| | | | | |
30 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
Compensation Governance Practices
To support our compensation philosophy and objectives, we are committed to the following compensation governance practices:
What we do:
✓ Focus on retention of high-performing employees
✓ Pay for performance
✓ Align executive and stockholder interests
✓ Impose stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers
✓ Prohibit our directors and executive officers from hedging, pledging, and short selling Company stock
✓ Engage an independent compensation consultant
✓ Maintain a clawback policy
✓ Provide long-term equity incentive compensation to all of our employees
✓ Conduct an annual review of our compensation program based on market conditions, performance, and stockholder feedback
What we don’t do:
û Pay based on a percentage of assets under management
û Provide tax gross-ups
û Provide special perquisites for executives
û Maintain supplemental retirement benefit plans
û Make option grants below fair market value
û Reprice stock options
û Provide for “single-trigger” severance or vesting acceleration
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 31 |
Compensation Program in Detail
Compensation Program Elements
The Compensation Committee believes it is important to pay our NEOs in a manner that balances short- and long-term compensation and cash and equity-based compensation. Our NEOs’ compensation program includes three primary elements: base salary, short-term incentives in the form of an annual cash bonus, and long-term equity incentives, with a significant portion subject to multi-year performance-based vesting.
The Compensation Committee’s philosophy on pay mix applies throughout the entire organization, with all AGNC employees receiving a portion of their compensation in the form of short-term and long-term incentives. The proportion of an individual’s target total direct compensation opportunity in the form of variable incentive-based elements relative to fixed elements is directly correlated to the individual’s level of responsibility and role in the organization. Employees with greater seniority and greater responsibility have higher proportions of incentive-based compensation in their target mix. Similarly, within the incentive-based elements, the proportion of LTI generally corresponds with the individual’s level of responsibility in the organization.
Base Salary
Base salary provides a baseline level of cash compensation to our NEOs and is a fixed expense for the Company. The Compensation Committee established base salaries for our NEOs considering a variety of factors, including:
•the competitive market for executive officers
•the scope of each executive officer’s responsibilities
•the highly complex and unique services provided by our NEOs
•the desire to retain our NEOs
•the duties and responsibilities of the NEOs
•internal and external pay equity
The Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries for our NEOs annually and at the time of a promotion or other change in responsibilities, and salaries may be adjusted after considering the above factors. The annual base salaries set forth in the table below are the minimum levels required in each executive’s respective employment agreement. The base salary level for each of our NEOs was unchanged from 2021, with the exception of Mr. Kain, whose base salary in 2022 decreased as a result of his transition to the role of Executive Chair.
| | | | | |
| NEO | 2022 Base Salary |
Peter J. Federico | $900,000 |
Gary D. Kain | $500,000 |
Christopher J. Kuehl | $900,000 |
Bernice E. Bell | $500,000 |
Kenneth L. Pollack | $500,000 |
Annual Bonus
The Compensation Committee has established performance criteria for short-term incentives that directly correspond to the areas of greatest impact to our short- and long-term performance and operations, creating a direct connection between business success and our NEOs’ compensation. Each NEO’s target for short-term incentive compensation, set forth in the table below, is determined based on an evaluation of the same factors used in setting base salaries.
| | | | | | | | |
| NEO | 2021 Target Annual Bonus | 2022 Target Annual Bonus |
Peter J. Federico | $2,700,000 1 | $3,600,000 |
Gary D. Kain | $4,500,000 2 | $3,600,000 |
Christopher J. Kuehl | $1,800,000 3 | $2,000,000 |
Bernice E. Bell | $1,000,000 | $1,250,000 |
Kenneth L. Pollack | $850,000 | $1,000,000 |
1.Reflects a prorated amount based on a target annual bonus of $1,800,000 for the period from January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021 and $3,600,000 for the period from July 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 corresponding to his promotion to Chief Executive Officer.
2.Reflects a prorated amount based on a target annual bonus of $5,400,000 for the period from January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021 and $3,600,000 for the period from July 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 corresponding to his transition to Executive Chair.
3.Reflects a prorated amount based on a target annual bonus of $1,600,000 for the period from January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021 and $2,000,000 for the period from July 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 corresponding to his promotion to Chief Investment Officer.
The target bonuses for Messrs. Kain, Federico, and Kuehl in 2022 reflect the first full-year at their target levels following Mr. Kain’s transition to the role of Executive Chair and the promotion of Messrs. Federico and Kuehl to the roles of Chief Executive
| | | | | |
32 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
Officer and Chief Investment Officer, respectively, in July 2021. Compensation for each of Messrs. Kain, Federico, and Kuehl were pro-rated in 2021 to reflect their changed roles during the year. In 2022, the Compensation Committee also evaluated the compensation package provided to our other NEOs in consultation with FW Cook. As part of this review, the Compensation Committee examined compensation practices at comparable companies and considered the scope of each NEO’s responsibilities. After considering these factors, the Compensation Committee determined it was appropriate to increase Ms. Bell’s bonus target to 250% of her base salary and increase Mr. Pollack's bonus target to 200% of his base salary for 2022.
Corporate Scorecard for Calculating Annual Bonus
The Compensation Committee uses a Corporate Scorecard to assist in its evaluation of NEO performance and awarding annual cash bonuses. The Corporate Scorecard establishes a framework that incentivizes and rewards behavior over a broad range of circumstances, and as described in greater detail below, the 2022 Corporate Scorecard was based on a mix of financial and strategic measures that corresponded to the core elements of our value proposition for stockholders. We believe the goals and measures included in the Corporate Scorecard effectively align NEO short-term incentives with financial, strategic, and operational performance of greatest importance to our business. Under the 2022 Corporate Scorecard, actual payouts can range from 0% to 150% of target for each metric, with category and metric weights as assigned by the Compensation Committee, and payouts for performance between the threshold and maximum level of each measure are determined through linear interpolation. The cash bonuses for Messrs. Kain and Federico were based solely on achievement of the Corporate Scorecard measures. The other NEOs’ short-term cash incentives were based predominantly on the Corporate Scorecard measures and to a lesser extent on personal performance.
2022 Corporate Scorecard
The Compensation Committee annually reviews the appropriateness of the Corporate Scorecard and considers feedback from stockholders as part of their deliberations. In response to feedback received during investor outreach in prior years, we revised the Corporate Scorecard in 2019 to increase the weighting of financial performance and realign the strategic and operational objectives more directly with the Company’s value proposition to stockholders. In 2020, we increased the rigor of the relative annual economic return measure by raising the base target to 1% (above peer group average) from 0% (equal to peer group average), with the threshold and outperformance bounds each also increased by 1% to reflect appropriate ranges based upon the historical distribution of results and other factors.
In conducting its annual review in January 2022, the Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate to reallocate the weightings of the financial performance metrics. Prior to 2022, the financial performance metrics were weighted equally (25% each) among three components: (i) absolute annual economic return, (ii) relative annual economic return and (iii) relative price-to-tangible book ratio. For the 2022 Corporate Scorecard, the Compensation Committee adjusted the weightings to reduce relative price-to-tangible book ratio from 25% to 15% and increase relative annual economic return from 25% to 35%. The Compensation Committee concluded that revising the allocation among the relative measures to increase relative annual economic return better aligns the scorecard with the performance metrics prioritized by investors. In addition, the Compensation Committee determined that market conditions and stock price volatility among the Agency REIT Peer Group made the relative price-to-tangible book ratio a less reliable indicator of performance. The Compensation Committee also revised the strategic and operational metrics to include ESG factors as a standalone element, reflecting our increased focus on sustainability and human capital as discussed further on page 7. With these changes, the Compensation Committee determined that the other Corporate Scorecard measures and performance levels adopted in January 2020 and applied in 2021 remained appropriate for 2022 when taking into consideration numerous factors, including continued alignment of the Corporate Scorecard with the Compensation Committee’s overall compensation philosophy, the level of rigor of the goals and objectives in light of market conditions, and relevant feedback from stockholders. As in prior years, the Compensation Committee set the financial measures for the Corporate Scorecard in January 2022 following an evaluation of historic performance over a five-year period, back-testing financial measures over this period to evaluate hypothetical payout levels when applying the Corporate Scorecard to those periods, and our high-level forecast. Although the outlook for financial markets remained uncertain at the outset of 2022, the Compensation Committee also weighed the value of maintaining consistency in measures. Following this review, the Compensation Committee concluded that the threshold, target, and outperformance levels for the Corporate Scorecard financial measures, weighted at 75% of the overall Corporate Scorecard, remained challenging for 2022 in a market environment marked by ongoing recovery from the Pandemic’s economic shocks, rapidly changing monetary policy, and continued economic uncertainty. The Compensation Committee also determined that it remained appropriate to continue including non-financial strategic and operational objectives weighted at 25% of the overall Corporate Scorecard.
Our Corporate Scorecard was designed to incentivize and reward results over a broad range of circumstances through balanced weightings of absolute and relative financial performance and strategic and operational objectives.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 33 |
| | |
| Financial Metrics (75% of Total Corporate Scorecard) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Performance Continuum |
Category Weight | Performance Metric | Metric
Weight | Below
Threshold | Threshold | Target | Out-
performance |
75% | Absolute Economic Return 1 | 25.0% | < 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.0% | ≥ 17.0% |
Economic Return vs. Peer Index 1,2 | 35.0% | < (5.0%) | (5.0%) | 1.0% | ≥ 5.5% |
Price-to-Tangible Book Ratio vs. Peer Index 2 | 15.0% | < (6.5%) | (6.5%) | 3.5% | ≥ 11.0% |
| | | Payout Continuum (% of Metric Weight) |
| | | 0% | 50% | 100% | 150% |
1.Economic return is calculated on tangible common equity per share.
2.Reflects AGNC’s relative performance to the unweighted, simple average of the Agency REIT Peer Group. Our relative economic return measure is calculated on an October 1 – September 30 year basis due to the availability of comparative data.
The financial measures emphasized our focus on generating strong absolute and relative economic returns and maintaining a strong common stock trading price to tangible book value relative to our peers.
Our economic return reflects the overall return we generate on our common equity capital and is comprised of our dividends declared and the change in the tangible net book value per share of common stock over the relevant period. As such, it incorporates all aspects of our investment activity, including interest received on our investments, net of borrowing costs, and realized and unrealized gains and losses on our investments, hedging instruments, and other assets and liabilities. We believe this measure best reflects a composite view of AGNC’s financial performance over any time period. Most investors and research analysts active in the residential mortgage REIT sector utilize this metric as a primary factor in analyzing residential mortgage REIT performance.
Our Compensation Committee has included both absolute and relative economic return as separate financial performance measures. Our inclusion of absolute economic return is reflective of our focus on generating positive economic returns for our stockholders and supporting our dividend, regardless of overall macroeconomic conditions. Relative economic return has been included to provide a comparison of our performance against our peers and to reward our management team and employees for outperformance. While a favorable macroeconomic climate may drive a strong absolute economic return, relative economic return requires out-performance relative to peers, all of which are subject to the same prevailing macroeconomic conditions. For 2022, our Compensation Committee retained our target goal of absolute economic return at 10% and set the target goal for relative economic return at 1% above the Agency REIT Peer Group average. These goals reflect the Compensation Committee’s view that an absolute economic return target of 10% would be appropriately challenging and that outperformance of the peer average by 1% should be the base target for relative economic return.
Our third financial measure is our stock price to tangible net book value per share, or “price-to-book ratio,” relative to peers. Our Compensation Committee has set our target relative price-to-book ratio at a significant premium of 3.5% to the Agency REIT Peer Group average. Price-to-book ratio is a valuation metric utilized by many investors and research analysts and reflects the premium (or discount) to tangible net book value of a company implied by the company’s stock price. As such, the price-to-book ratio for AGNC relative to peers may in certain market environments imply the relative perception by the market of, or outlook for, AGNC as compared to its peer group. We believe that our track record of favorable long-term financial performance, low-cost operating structure, disciplined risk management, stockholder focus, and significant scale and liquidity should position AGNC for a premium valuation relative to our peer group in most market environments.
Collectively, our three financial measures incentivize our management team to drive favorable returns – on both an absolute and relative basis – for our stockholders. Our success in generating economic returns at or above target levels while maintaining targeted premium valuation levels on a price-to-book basis should translate into favorable total stock returns for our stockholders. As such, we believe these metrics appropriately align our short-term incentive plan with our stockholders.
| | |
| Strategic and Operational Metrics (25% of Total Corporate Scorecard) |
As noted above, our Compensation Committee believes our value proposition should position AGNC for a premium valuation. Our Compensation Committee seeks to drive management performance in these areas and focuses our strategic and operational efforts on the following components:
•Operating Efficiency: maintain low operating cost structure relative to peers and continually identify opportunities to improve operations across functional groups where practicable
•Disciplined Risk Management: mitigate business and operational risk based on the Company’s comprehensive risk management framework
•Stockholder Focus and Capital Management: provide detailed and transparent financial disclosure, actively engage with stockholders, and maintain an active stockholder-friendly approach to capital management consistent with broader market considerations
•ESG Framework: incorporate material ESG and sustainability factors into our strategy, business, and operations and provide disclosure regarding ESG and corporate sustainability philosophy and practices
| | | | | |
34 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
Annual 2022 Corporate Scorecard Incentive Compensation Determination
Following a review of each of the components of the 2022 Corporate Scorecard, the Compensation Committee calculated a total scorecard payout for 2022 of 61.9% of target. This below-target and significantly reduced payout ratio relative to prior years was reflective of the Company’s financial performance in 2022. A more detailed discussion regarding each of the elements included in the Corporate Scorecard is provided below.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Index | Index
Weight | Index
Payout | Weighted
Payout |
Financial Metrics | 75% | 49.2% | 36.9% |
Strategic / Operational Metrics | 25% | 100.0% | 25.0% |
Corporate Scorecard Payout | | | 61.9% |
2022 Financial Metric Results
Based on our 2022 Corporate Scorecard, a review of our 2022 financial performance indicated a 49.2% payout for the financial metric portion. AGNC generated a negative absolute economic return for the year, below the threshold, primarily as a result of macroeconomic conditions that drove historically poor returns for fixed income markets broadly and the Agency MBS market specifically. After years of relative economic return outperformance compared to the Agency REIT Peer Group, in 2022 AGNC moderately underperformed the Agency REIT Peer Group by 3.2% on the relative economic return metric, as AGNC’s predominant investment focus on Agency MBS led to relative underperformance against more diversified peers. For the relative price-to-tangible book ratio measure, AGNC outperformed the Agency REIT Peer Group by 2.3%, which was below the +3.5% target.
2022 Strategic and Operational Review
In evaluating our performance under the operational and strategic objective portion of the Corporate Scorecard, the Compensation Committee noted the following accomplishments, among others, in determining that the Company met target expectations and achieved 100% performance on the operational and strategic objectives.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 35 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Component of Value Proposition | Objective / Focus | Highlights |
| Operating Efficiency | ü Maintain low operating cost structure relative to the residential mortgage REIT and broader asset management industries
| ü Continued to outperform mREIT industry on an operating cost basis by a wide margin ü Completed transition of custody clearing / settlement services to our wholly-owned broker dealer subsidiary Bethesda Securities, LLC, generating substantial cost savings and reducing exposure to third-party custodian operations ü Enhanced operational efficiencies through development of new tools and processes in Agency MBS valuation and treasury and middle office operations
|
| Disciplined Risk Management | ü Utilize comprehensive risk management framework predicated on careful asset selection, disciplined hedging and diversified funding to preserve tangible net book value across a wide range of market scenarios
ü Maintain business continuity through operations and cybersecurity risk management | ü Operated in compliance with investment risk reporting framework throughout 2022, mitigating exposure to market volatility and diminished liquidity in a rising interest rate environment ü Maintained funding diversification with ample availability and capacity ü Continued to optimize funding, custody, and TBA clearing through Bethesda Securities and further integrated Bethesda Securities and AGNC back and middle office operations ü Maintained compliance with all reporting, listing, and REIT regulatory requirements ü Continued improvement and testing of IT infrastructure to strengthen information security posture and resiliency ü Maintained and enhanced corporate culture focused on compliance and risk management, including training on code of ethics and insider trading requirements, as evidenced by employee survey results ü Implemented new and more efficient processes, including valuation process for Agency MBS ü Mobilized to greater in office work expectations in March without disruption |
| Stockholder Focus and Capital Management | ü Provide detailed and transparent public financial disclosure, actively engage with investors, and provide clear and effective stockholder communications
ü Maintain an active, stockholder-friendly capital management approach that is consistent with broader market considerations | ü Enhanced corporate communications and investor outreach initiatives ü Participated in 11 sell-side hosted events, including retail network calls hosted by research analysts, held over 125 meetings and calls with institutional investors, and responded to over 360 letters, emails, and calls from retail investors throughout the year ü Enhanced liquidity and earnings capacity through ATM offerings of over $525 million of common stock and $150 million offering of new Series G Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ü Repurchased over $50 million of common stock at a meaningful discount to tangible net book value |
| ESG Framework and Practices | ü Expand and improve high-quality ESG and corporate sustainability practices, and incorporate material ESG and sustainability factors into AGNC’s strategy, business, and operations | ü Maintained high quality governance oversight and structure, including compliance with governance requirements ü Filed second annual ESG report and disclosure consistent with SASB and TCFD reporting framework ü Created employee-led committee focused on community engagement and corporate giving ü Employee survey results reflect high levels of satisfaction, including in areas of DEI, engagement, training, and development ü Leased new headquarters office space in LEED Platinum certified building; designed build out with focus on sustainability and wellness |
| | | | | |
36 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
Individual Bonus Decisions
The 2022 bonus payments for our NEOs are reflected in the following table:
| | | | | | | | |
| NEO | Short-Term Incentive Award ($) | Percentage of 2022 Target |
Peter J. Federico | $2,228,400 | 61.9% |
Gary D. Kain | $2,228,400 | 61.9% |
Christopher J. Kuehl | $1,512,000 | 75.6% |
Bernice E. Bell | $1,001,250 | 80.1% |
Kenneth L. Pollack | $801,000 | 80.1% |
Short-term incentives for Messrs. Kain and Federico in 2022 were based solely on achievement of the Corporate Scorecard measures. Based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the 2022 Corporate Scorecard, this resulted in a payout of 61.9% of target for Messrs. Kain and Federico. Short-term cash incentives for our NEOs other than Messrs. Federico and Kain were based predominantly on the Corporate Scorecard measures and to a lesser extent on individual performance. After considering the contributions of Messrs. Kuehl and Pollack and Ms. Bell, as discussed below, and management’s collective achievements throughout the year, the Compensation Committee determined that a rating of 107.5% was appropriate for each of Messrs. Kuehl and Pollack and Ms. Bell for the individual component element of the Corporate Scorecard. In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee also recognized the difficulty in completing these accomplishments during periods of extreme market volatility and the challenging macroeconomic environment present in 2022. The Compensation Committee recognized the efforts of Ms. Bell and Messrs. Kuehl and Pollack in a number of operational accomplishments throughout the organization that contributed to increased efficiency and resiliency, including the transition of custody, clearing, and settlement services of agency MBS to our wholly owned broker dealer subsidiary and enhanced processes for securities valuations and cash management. Ms. Bell and Messrs. Kuehl and Pollack were also recognized for their efforts to maintain high levels of employee engagement during a period of market uncertainty and through the mobilization to greater in office work expectations, all with limited workforce attrition.
Mr. Kuehl was awarded a cash bonus at 75.6% of his target based on a relative weighting of the Corporate Scorecard at 70% and his personal performance at 30%. In evaluating his personal performance, the Compensation Committee noted his efforts in repositioning the Company’s investment portfolio in response to rapidly changing and historically challenging conditions. In addition, the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Kuehl’s focus on risk management throughout a year of substantial market volatility and illiquidity. Ms. Bell and Mr. Pollack each were awarded 80.1% of their target bonus, which reflects a relative weighting of the Corporate Scorecard at 60% and their individual personal performance at 40%. For Ms. Bell, the Compensation Committee considered, among other things, her continued focus on reviewing internal procedures to improve operational efficiency. In 2022, Ms. Bell led the Company’s review and evaluation of hedge designations, which expanded flexibility and capacity for hedging activities during the volatile market conditions, and improved our internal procedures for investment and derivative valuations. For Mr. Pollack, the Compensation Committee considered, among other things, his continued leadership in and attention to our corporate governance, compliance, and enterprise-wide risk management and maintaining appropriate communication among management and the Board. In addition, the Compensation Committee noted Mr. Pollack’s work in enhancing the Company’s business continuity and resiliency during market stress and volatility scenarios.
Equity Incentive Compensation
The Compensation Committee believes that equity incentive compensation is an important component of our NEO compensation package and is critical in attracting, motivating, and retaining outstanding employees. Equity incentive compensation is intended to closely align our NEOs’ and other employees’ interests with our long-term success and promote long-term employee retention. Our long-term incentive program consists of a combination of performance-based RSUs and time-vesting RSUs.
Performance-based RSUs are designed to reward creation of long-term economic returns for our stockholders both on an absolute and relative basis. To establish challenging economic thresholds and motivate long-term performance, the awards vest at the end of a three-year performance period based 50% on our absolute economic return and 50% on our economic return relative to the unweighted average of economic returns of the Agency REIT Peer Group. In establishing vesting criteria for these awards, the Compensation Committee considers historical returns for us and our peers and our forecast. Absolute and relative economic returns are calculated on a cumulative basis over the three-year performance period. Achievement of these goals will be determined in the same manner, including the same peer group, as described above with respect to the short-term incentive awards for such year. For performance between the threshold, target, and outperformance measures, the number of shares vested will be determined through linear interpolation.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 37 |
2022 Long-Term Incentive Awards
The 2022 long-term incentive awards made by the Compensation Committee in February 2022 were at each NEO’s target levels as specified in their respective employment agreement and are reflected in the following table:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mix of Long-Term Incentive Awards |
| NEO |
Time-Vested
RSUs ($) 1
| Performance-Vested
RSUs ($) 2 | Total Value
of Awards ($) 3 |
Peter J. Federico | 1,485,000 | 3,015,000 | 4,500,000 |
| Gary D. Kain | 1,386,000 | 2,814,000 | 4,200,000 |
| Christopher J. Kuehl | 858,000 | 1,742,000 | 2,600,000 |
Bernice E. Bell | 412,500 | 837,500 | 1,250,000 |
| Kenneth L. Pollack | 330,000 | 670,000 | 1,000,000 |
1.Awards vest ratably over a three-year and one-half month period in equal annual installments.
2.Represents grant-date fair value assuming performance achievement at 100% of target. Performance payouts may range from 0% to 200% of target shares based on actual performance. Awards are subject to cliff vesting two years and eleven and one-half months after the grant date, subject to a three-year performance period.
3.Awards were granted on March 1, 2022 based on a $12.99 stock price.
The fair value of these awards as of their March 1, 2022 grant date is included in the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. The ultimate value of the RSUs will depend on AGNC’s total stockholder return over the vesting period, and in the case of the performance-based RSUs, AGNC’s absolute and relative economic return over the three-year performance period.
In setting the level of awards to our NEOs, the Compensation Committee considered a number of factors, including the compensation practices at comparable companies, and our ongoing commitment to link NEO compensation to our long-term performance. The Compensation Committee also considered the roles and ongoing responsibilities of each of our NEOs and relevant market data. The grant levels for our NEOs in 2022 reflected the first full-year compensation for Messrs. Federico, Kain, and Kuehl following the promotions of Messrs. Federico and Kuehl and the transition of Mr. Kain to Executive Chair mid-year in 2021.
•The 2022 awards to Messrs. Federico and Kuehl reflected the full-year target LTI award in their new roles as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer, respectively. By comparison, the awards they received in 2021 were comprised of a proration between their target LTI award levels for their new roles during the second half of 2021 and their former roles during the first half of 2021. Their 2022 target LTI awards continued to be allocated 67% performance-based and 33% time-based.
• Mr. Kain’s long-term incentive target of $4,200,000 in 2022 reflected the full-year target LTI award in his new role as Executive Chair. His 2021 award was comprised of a proration between his target LTI award level in his role as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer during the first half of 2021 and his target LTI award level in his role as Executive Chair during the second half of 2021. His 2022 LTI continued to be allocated 67% performance-based and 33% time-based.
• Ms. Bell’s long-term incentive target was increased from $1,100,000 to $1,250,000 in 2022, with the allocation of 2022 awards, at target, being 67% performance-based and 33% time-based.
• Mr. Pollack’s long-term incentive target was increased from $950,000 to $1,000,000 in 2022, with the allocation of 2022 awards, at target, being 67% performance-based and 33% time-based.
In granting awards in 2022, the Compensation Committee also reviewed the measures used for performance-based RSUs and determined that it was appropriate to retain the measures established in 2021 without adjustment. Although the outlook for financial markets remained uncertain at the outset of 2022, the Compensation Committee considered the value of consistency year-over-year in considering adjustments to the scorecard and concluded that these measures remained challenging in the current market environment for awards made in 2022. The table below sets forth the below threshold, threshold, target, and outperformance levels established by the Compensation Committee for performance-based RSU awards made in 2022.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance Variable | Metric
Weight | Below
Threshold | Threshold | Base Performance
Target | Outperformance |
| Absolute Three-Year Economic Return | 50% | < 0.0% | 0.0% | 30.0% | ≥ 60.0% |
| Relative Three-Year Economic Return | 50% | < (4.5%) | (4.5%) | 3.0% | ≥ 10.5% |
| Payout Factor (% of Target Shares) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 200% |
| | | | | |
38 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
2020 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Awards
The three-year performance period for the performance-based RSU awards made to our employees in February 2020 was completed on December 31, 2022. The performance calculations included absolute economic return measured from December 31, 2019 through December 31, 2022 and relative economic return as compared to an Agency mortgage REIT peer group determined at the time of the grant and measured from September 30, 2019 through September 30, 2022. AGNC generated an absolute economic return of -19.1% and relative economic return of +21.9% for the applicable measurement period, resulting in a vesting factor of 100% of the target number of shares for the 2020 performance-based RSUs, as validated by the Compensation Committee. Unless deferred by the NEO, distribution of shares in settlement of these awards occurred on February 15, 2023, provided that the recipient remained employed by the Company on that date. The diagram below includes the performance targets and details the performance calculations for these awards. Additional details regarding these RSUs are provided in the Outstanding Equity Awards table on page 47 of this proxy statement. These measures were established in 2020 based on then anticipated ranges of performance deemed to be appropriately challenging based on the Compensation Committee’s analyses, including back-testing.
1. Peer index reflects an unweighted, simple average of the peer group constituents: NLY, TWO, IVR, ARR, CMO, ANH and DX. Under pre-established peer group criteria, if a peer undergoes a merger or acquisition, its economic return is included through the quarter ended just prior to completion of the transaction. As a result of the acquisition of ANH announced in December 2020 (closed in March 2021) and the acquisition of CMO announced in July 2021 (closed in October 2021), ANH has been included through December 31, 2020, and CMO has been included through September 30, 2021.
Savings and Health and Welfare Benefits
Our executive officers participate in a broad-based 401(k) retirement savings plan generally applicable to all our employees, which includes an opportunity to receive employer matching contributions. We do not currently provide for pension plans, supplemental retirement plans, or deferred compensation plans for our executive officers. We previously provided our executive officers the option to elect to defer payments of long-term incentive awards. In addition, all of our executive officers also participate in medical, dental, vision, disability, life and long-term care insurance, and qualified transportation benefits that are provided generally to all our employees.
Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits
We do not believe our executive officers should receive special perquisites and benefits and do not currently provide our executive officers with any perquisites or other personal benefits that are not available on a non-discriminatory basis to all employees.
Compensation Decision Process
Compensation Comparator Group
AGNC’s internal management structure, size, and scale relative to other residential mortgage REITs and our Agency mortgage-backed securities investment focus are significant differentiators relative to other potential comparative public companies and have made identifying a peer group for AGNC challenging. As a result, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy to benchmark compensation levels against comparative companies.
We are the second largest residential mortgage REIT overall by market capitalization, total assets, and total equity when compared with the Resi mREIT Universe. Eight other REITs in the Resi mREIT Universe are internally managed, and the other ten
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 39 |
mortgage REITs in the Resi mREIT Universe are externally managed by a third party and provide only limited public compensation disclosure. Moreover, only two other internally managed mREITs in the Resi mREIT Universe had a market capitalization above $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2022, and only one of those REITs had an Agency mortgage-backed securities focus comparable to AGNC. Residential mREITs that primarily invest in non-Agency mortgage-backed securities involve different risk and return profiles and will have performance that is not well correlated to ours. The business and operations of commercial mortgage REITs center on commercial real estate finance rather than single-family home mortgages and will have performance linked to credit risk decisions, including geographic and sector weightings, that are less relevant for our business model.
Although we are an internally managed REIT, our business of investing primarily in Agency mortgage-backed securities makes our operations somewhat comparable to asset management firms. However, asset management firms employ a different business model: they primarily generate income from management fees charged to clients based on, among other things, the level of assets under management or financial returns that clients earn on their investments. By comparison, AGNC generates income primarily from its investments in Agency securities. As a result, AGNC’s performance may vary materially from asset management firms given the vastly different asset base and significant leverage and hedging activities inherent in our business model.
Although we have few close peers considering our internal management structure, size, and scale relative to other mortgage REITs and investment focus on Agency mortgage-backed securities, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of FW Cook, reviews compensation levels and practices at various financial services companies as part of its consideration of our compensation structure, programs, and practices. In 2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed the compensation practices at 18 companies, including seven internally managed publicly traded mortgage REITs and 10 publicly traded asset management companies and non-bank financial services companies. This is the same group considered by the Compensation Committee in 2021, with the exception of one asset management firm which was removed from the group after being acquired in 2021. The Compensation Committee determined the highly specialized and unique skill sets required of executives in these industries are most comparable to those required of AGNC’s NEOs, although very few would be an exact match for our Company. However, in considering this analysis, the Compensation Committee believes that, due to their vastly different business models, capital allocations, and assets, these companies collectively will have performance that is not well correlated to AGNC’s performance, and accordingly they are not a suitable peer set for purposes of evaluating management's relative performance or the alignment of our compensation program to our performance.
| | | | | |
| Mortgage REITs: | Asset Management and Financial Services Companies: |
Annaly Capital Management, Inc. | Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. |
| Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. | AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. |
Chimera Investment Corporation | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. |
Ladder Capital Corp. | Apollo Global Management LLC |
MFA Financial, Inc. | Ares Management LP |
Redwood Trust, Inc. | DigitalBridge Group, Inc. |
| Two Harbors Investment Corp. | Invesco Ltd. |
| KKR & Co. L.P. |
| The Blackstone Group L.P. |
| The Carlyle Group L.P. |
Performance Comparator Group
The Compensation Committee has determined that a subset of the Resi mREIT Universe, which we refer to as the “Agency REIT Peer Group,” provides a better basis for comparison to evaluate our performance and operations under our Corporate Scorecard and performance-based LTI awards. For purposes of 2022 incentive awards, these REITs were:
•Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
•ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc.
•Dynex Capital, Inc.
•Invesco Mortgage Capital, Inc.
•Orchid Island Capital, Inc.
•Two Harbors Investment Corp.
The Agency REIT Peer Group companies have portfolios and investment objectives that most closely resemble our own focus on Agency securities. Non-agency REITs in the Resi mREIT Universe have strategies that place a greater emphasis on credit-sensitive assets than our portfolio and those of our Agency REIT Peer Group. As such, these REITs would be expected to achieve divergent returns from our own Agency securities-focused portfolio through various economic cycles and conditions. The Compensation Committee thus determined that our economic returns and trading price relative to book value are appropriately measured against a simple, unweighted average of the Agency REIT Peer Group for purposes of determining our relative performance. Only two of the six REITs in the Agency REIT Peer Group were included in the group of companies for which executive
| | | | | |
40 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
compensation practices were reviewed by the Compensation Committee, Annaly Capital Management, Inc. and Two Harbors Investment Corp. The other four companies included in the Agency REIT Peer Group were excluded from our compensation comparator group because these four REITs either are significantly smaller than AGNC or are externally managed.
The Compensation Committee continues to evaluate our peer group construction in response to changes in market conditions and the mortgage REIT sector. The Compensation Committee desires to limit the number of year-over-year changes to this peer group in order to provide meaningful ongoing comparative analyses for its work. The Compensation Committee elected to add Orchid Island Capital, Inc. to the Agency REIT Peer Group for 2022 incentive compensation awards based on guiding parameters, including a minimum of $500 million in total stockholders’ equity and approximately 50% or greater allocation of capital to Agency residential mortgage-backed securities at the time of inclusion. Two companies in the 2021 Agency REIT Peer Group, Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation and Capstead Mortgage Corporation, were acquired in 2021 and were removed from the Agency REIT Peer Group for purposes of awards made in 2022.
Role of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee
Our Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, is responsible for establishing and overseeing our philosophy regarding executive compensation and for making decisions relating to the compensation of our NEOs. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for ensuring that the total compensation offered to our executive officers is fair and competitive and motivates high performance. The terms of any employment agreements with our NEOs and actions on compensation under the employment agreements are also under the primary direction of the Compensation Committee. Decisions that set the compensation of our CEO or Executive Chair are subject to the review and approval of the Company’s independent directors based on the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of goals and objectives.
The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the Company’s compensation policies and programs and makes any modifications that the Committee deems necessary or advisable, subject to the terms of such policies or programs. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves the Company’s goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the NEOs and other employees of the Company.
Role of Management
All compensation decisions related to our executive officers are at the discretion of the Compensation Committee or independent directors of our Board. The Compensation Committee considers the advice and counsel of the CEO when evaluating compensation of the other NEOs given his direct day-to-day working relationship with those executives. Taking this feedback into consideration, the Compensation Committee engages in discussions and either determines the compensation of our NEOs or makes a final recommendation to the Board related to compensation paid to NEOs. Neither our CEO nor our Executive Chair is present or a participant in the portions of meetings of the Compensation Committee or of the Board at which his performance is evaluated and his compensation is discussed and determined; only independent directors participate in such matters.
Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant
Under its charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to select, retain, and terminate compensation consultants. The Compensation Committee has retained FW Cook to provide advice and counsel on executive compensation opportunities and program design and structure. Representatives of FW Cook attended certain meetings of the Compensation Committee, including meeting with members of the Compensation Committee without members of management present. FW Cook assists the Compensation Committee in its analysis and evaluation of our executive compensation program, practices, and communications and provides the Compensation Committee with market data and analysis of certain comparator companies that hire personnel and executives with similar skills and experience as our executive management team. FW Cook also provides advice with respect to our Corporate Scorecard, our long-term incentive awards, the setting of measures for performance-based incentive compensation, and other work that informs executive compensation decisions. During 2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed the independence of FW Cook using assessment criteria under applicable Nasdaq and SEC rules and concluded FW Cook was independent and had no conflicts of interest.
Risk Assessment and Compensation
The Compensation Committee regularly monitors the risks and rewards associated with our compensation program. The Compensation Committee established our compensation program with the intent to align our interests with stockholders and prevent unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. We believe that our compensation policies and practices are well balanced and designed to avoid creating incentives that encourage unnecessary or excessive risks that could potentially have a material adverse effect on the Company. We use variable compensation for all of our NEOs, with a focus on performance based compensation. We have designed a compensation program with a mix of short- and long-term incentives to ensure management focuses on the long-term impact of short-term decisions and that management’s interests are aligned with stockholders. At least 50% and up to 67% of our NEOs’ long-term incentive awards vest based on performance over a three-year period. Compliance with the risk management framework designed to address excessive risk taking and approved by our Board is an integral part of the strategic and operational objectives of the Corporate Scorecard used for short-term incentive compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee continually assesses our executive compensation programs and has implemented additional policies and practices that we believe have further mitigated compensation driven risk, including the adoption of a clawback policy and executive officer stock ownership guidelines.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 41 |
Other Compensation Policies and Practices
Stock Ownership Guidelines
We have adopted stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers establishing share ownership targets based on a multiple of base salary. The minimum objective is 6x for our Executive Chair and our CEO, 4x for our Chief Investment Officer, and 3x for all other executive officers. Until the foregoing ownership requirements are met, each individual is required to retain at least 50% of the shares of common stock received upon vesting or earn-out of stock-based compensation, net of any shares withheld or sold to pay or reimburse taxes on such income. The retention obligations also apply in the event ownership levels fall below applicable guideline levels due to a decline in stock price. Shares of time-vested RSUs granted under the 2016 Equity Plan (whether vested, unvested, or subject to a deferral election) are included in determining the number of shares held for this purpose, net of anticipated tax withholdings. Shares of unvested performance-based RSUs are not included for this purpose prior to completion of the applicable performance period. As of February 24, 2023, all of our NEOs had complied with their obligations under our stock ownership guidelines.
The following table sets forth the total stock ownership of all our NEOs, including beneficially owned, unvested, and deferred shares, as calculated pursuant to our stock ownership guidelines as of February 24, 2023:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Name | Beneficially
Owned
Shares (#) | | Unvested Shares (#) 2 | | Vested/Deferred Shares (#) 2,3 | | Total (#) |
Peter J. Federico | 477,528 | | 190,082 | | 137,662 | | 805,272 |
Gary D. Kain | 1,746,681 | | 181,769 | | 430,106 | | 2,358,556 |
Christopher J. Kuehl | 495,343 | | 67,785 | | — | | 563,128 |
Bernice E. Bell | 73,752 | | 40,242 | | 32,467 | | 146,461 |
Kenneth L. Pollack | 24,192 | | 32,327 | | 76,705 | | 133,224 |
1.Includes 667,920 shares held in a family trust over which shares Mr. Kain has voting and dispositive power.
2.Share amounts are net of anticipated tax withholdings.
3.Deferred shares are vested and non-forfeitable, subject to AGNC's clawback policy.
Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policy
Our Board has adopted a policy prohibiting our executive officers and directors from any hedging, pledging, or entering into margin loans with respect to any shares of our common stock or from engaging in short sales of our common stock or entering into any other transaction or derivative agreement where he or she would earn a profit or offset losses due to a decline of our stock price. By way of example, transactions prohibited under the policy may include options, short sales, puts, calls, or derivative actions such as forwards, futures, or swaps. In addition to the restrictions imposed on our executive officers and directors, the AGNC Mortgage Management, LLC Personal Investments Code prohibits all employees from engaging in financial transactions that directly hedge or offset, or are designed to directly hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of our common stock.
Clawback Policy
We have adopted a clawback policy relating to recovery of certain performance-based compensation in the event of an accounting restatement by the Company due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under U.S. federal securities laws resulting at least in part from the willful fraud, dishonesty, or recklessness of one of the Company’s executive officers in the performance of his or her duties to the Company. Under this policy, the Company would be entitled to seek recovery of the portion of performance-based compensation paid to our executive officers that would not have been earned had the Company’s restated financial statements been used in the determination of the amount of performance-based compensation originally awarded. This policy includes a three-year look back period. The Company anticipates revising its policy in 2023 to comply with anticipated Nasdaq listing standards to implement recent SEC rulemaking on clawback policies.
Employment Agreements
The Company has entered into employment agreements with each of our NEOs. The Compensation Committee has consulted with FW Cook on each of the agreements and believes that they provide appropriate and balanced incentives toward achieving the annual and long-term strategic objectives set by the Compensation Committee and create a stronger alignment of interests between our executives and our stockholders.
The Compensation Committee reviews the compensation of our executive officers on an annual basis and will make adjustments when warranted by personal performance, internal and external pay equity, and other considerations. The Company entered into restated employment agreements with Messrs. Kain, Federico, and Kuehl in December 2020 as a result of the announced transition of Mr. Kain to the role of Executive Chair of the Board and the promotions of Messrs. Federico and Kuehl to the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer, respectively. The revised employment agreements adjust their respective compensation arrangements in light of their new roles and responsibilities and are described in more detail herein. The Compensation Committee entered into amended and restated employment agreements dated January 22, 2021 with Ms. Bell and Mr. Pollack to
| | | | | |
42 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
increase their target compensation, and in 2022, as part of its annual review of NEO compensation, the Committee further adjusted their compensation levels.
The employment agreements for each NEO include certain severance payments and benefits if a NEO that is party to an employment agreement is terminated by the Company, including without “cause” or by the NEO for “good reason,” as each term is defined in each respective employment agreement and were the result of arms-length negotiations with these NEOs. The severance provisions included in the employment agreements related to a change of control include a “double trigger” requirement, which we determined was appropriate and in the best interest of our stockholders. See “Severance and Change of Control Payments” on page 48. The employment agreements with these NEOs also include covenants related to post-employment obligations in areas such as competition with us, solicitation of our employees, and the confidentiality of certain information.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 43 |
Report of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee
Our Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee reviewed and discussed with our management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” contained in this proxy statement. Based on that review and discussions, our Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement.
By the Compensation and Corporate
Governance Committee:
Morris A. Davis, Chair
John D. Fisk
Prue B. Larocca
Paul E. Mullings
| | | | | |
44 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
2022 Summary Compensation Table
The following table provides information concerning the compensation of our NEOs earned during our fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020.
In the column “Salary,” we disclose the amount of base salary paid to the NEO during the fiscal year. See “Base Salary” under “Compensation Program in Detail” above, for a description of the base salaries payable under each NEO’s employment agreement. In the column “Bonus,” we disclose the amount of short-term cash incentive payments earned by the NEO during the fiscal year. See “2022 Corporate Scorecard” for a description of the annual scorecard for calculating the cash component of our incentive compensation awards for 2022 that were paid in 2023, and which are included in the Summary Compensation Table for 2022. In the column “Stock Awards,” we disclose awards of RSUs under the 2016 Equity Plan, which includes both performance-based vesting and time-based vesting awards. The grant date fair value of the performance-based vesting RSU awards assumes performance achievement at 100% of the target amount. Performance payouts may range from 0% to 200% of the target amount based on actual performance achieved. See “Equity Incentive Compensation” under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” above.
The amounts in the column “All Other Compensation” represent employer matches for employee contributions to our 401(k) plan. The NEOs did not have any perquisites or other personal benefits in excess of the reporting thresholds during the fiscal year.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary
($) | Bonus
($) | Stock
Awards 1 ($) | All Other
Compensation
($) | Total
($) |
Peter J. Federico President and Chief Executive Officer2 | 2022 | 900,000 | 2,228,400 | 4,500,000 | 18,300 | 7,646,700 |
| 2021 | 900,000 | 2,632,500 | 3,400,000 | 17,400 | 6,949,900 |
| 2020 | 900,000 | 2,269,800 | 2,300,000 | 17,100 | 5,486,900 |
Gary D. Kain Executive Chair3
| 2022 | 500,000 | 2,228,400 | 4,200,000 | 18,300 | 6,946,700 |
| 2021 | 700,000 | 4,387,500 | 6,150,000 | 17,400 | 11,254,900 |
| 2020 | 900,000 | 6,809,400 | 8,100,000 | 17,100 | 15,826,500 |
Christopher J. Kuehl Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer4 | 2022 | 900,000 | 1,512,000 | 2,600,000 | 18,300 | 5,030,300 |
| 2021 | 900,000 | 1,764,000 | 2,125,000 | 17,400 | 4,806,400 |
| | 2020 | 900,000 | 1,936,818 | 1,650,000 | 17,100 | 4,503,918 |
Bernice E. Bell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2022 | 500,000 | 1,001,250 | 1,250,000 | 18,300 | 2,769,550 |
| 2021 | 500,000 | 985,000 | 1,100,000 | 17,400 | 2,602,400 |
| 2020 | 500,000 | 983,450 | 875,000 | 17,100 | 2,375,550 |
Kenneth L. Pollack Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary | 2022 | 500,000 | 801,000 | 1,000,000 | 18,300 | 2,319,300 |
| 2021 | 500,000 | 837,250 | 950,000 | 17,400 | 2,304,650 |
| 2020 | 500,000 | 809,900 | 800,000 | 17,100 | 2,127,000 |
1.The amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of each NEO’s awards calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, as required by SEC regulations. The fair market value of a stock award is based on the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant with the value of the performance-based RSUs based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date and is set at 100% of the target amount. For fiscal year 2022, the grant date fair value of performance-based RSUs at 100% of the target amount was $3,015,000 for Mr. Federico, $2,814,000 for Mr. Kain, $1,742,000 for Mr. Kuehl, $837,500 for Ms. Bell, and $670,000 for Mr. Pollack, and the grant date fair value of the performance-based RSUs assuming the highest level of performance conditions is met, was $6,030,000 for Mr. Federico, $5,628,000 for Mr. Kain, $3,484,000 for Mr. Kuehl, $1,675,000 for Ms. Bell, and $1,340,000 for Mr. Pollack. See below in the Grants of Plan Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2022 table for further details regarding the allocation of grants between time-vesting and performance-based RSUs.
2.Mr. Federico assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer on July 1, 2021. His 2021 compensation reflects blended compensation for his services for six months as our President and Chief Operating Officer and six months as our President and Chief Executive Officer. His total compensation in 2022 reflects full year compensation as our CEO.
3.Mr. Kain transitioned from the role of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer to Executive Chair on July 1, 2021.
4.Mr. Kuehl assumed the role of Chief Investment Officer on July 1, 2021. His 2021 compensation reflects blended compensation for his services for six months as our Executive Vice President, Agency Portfolio Investments and six months as our Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer. His total compensation in 2022 reflects full year compensation as our CIO.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 45 |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2022
In the following table we provide information about each grant of an award made to an NEO during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 under the 2016 Equity Plan. See “Equity Incentive Compensation” in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above for a description of the plan and awards. Amounts included in the “Grant date fair value of stock awards” column are valued in accordance with ASC 718 without reduction of any assumed forfeitures.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Name | Award Type 1 | Grant Date 2 | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards 3 | All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of Units | Grant date fair
value of stock awards 4 |
Threshold
(#) | Target
(#) | Maximum
(#) |
Peter J. Federico | | | | | | | |
| | Time-Based Vesting RSUs | 3/1/22 | | | | 114,318 | $1,485,000 |
| | Performance-Based Vesting RSUs | 3/1/22 | 0 | 232,101 | 464,202 | | $3,015,000 |
| Gary D. Kain | | | | | | | |
| | Time-Based Vesting RSUs | 3/1/22 | | | | 106,697 | $1,386,000 |
| | Performance-Based Vesting RSUs | 3/1/22 | 0 | 216,628 | 433,256 | | $2,814,000 |
Christopher J. Kuehl | | | | | | | |
| | Time-Based Vesting RSUs | 3/1/22 | | | | 66,050 | $858,000 |
| | Performance-Based Vesting RSUs | 3/1/22 | 0 | 134,103 | 268,206 | | $1,742,000 |
Bernice E. Bell | | | | | | | |
| | Time-Based Vesting RSUs | 3/1/22 | | | | 31,755 | $412,500 |
| | Performance-Based Vesting RSUs | 3/1/22 | 0 | 64,472 | 128,944 | | $837,500 |
Kenneth L. Pollack | | | | | | | |
| | Time-Based Vesting RSUs | 3/1/22 | | | | 25,404 | $330,000 |
| Performance-Based Vesting RSUs | 3/1/22 | 0 | 51,578 | 103,156 | | $670,000 |
1.AGNC time-based vesting RSU awards vest ratably over a three-year and one-half month period in three equal annual installments. AGNC performance-based vesting RSU awards are subject to cliff vesting two years and eleven and one-half months after the grant date after a three-year performance period and meeting performance conditions. Awards were granted to each NEO pursuant to the terms of his or her respective employment agreement.
2.The Compensation Committee approved all grants of plan-based awards in fiscal year 2022 at a meeting held on February 17, 2022.
3.Excludes accrued dividend equivalent units.
4.AGNC performance-based vesting RSUs’ grant date fair value assumes performance achievement at 100% of target. Performance payouts may range from 0% to 200% of target based on actual performance achieved.
| | | | | |
46 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End
In the table below we provide information about stock awards under the 2016 Equity Plan that have not vested and were outstanding as of December 31, 2022, for each NEO.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | Stock awards |
| Name | Grant Date | Number of shares or
units of stock that
have not vested 1
(#) | Market value of
shares or units of
stock that
have not vested 2
($) | Equity incentive plan
awards: number of
unearned units that
have not vested 1
(#) | Equity incentive plan
awards: market or
payout value
of unearned
units 2 ($) |
Peter J. Federico | | | | | |
| | 2/20/2020 3 | 17,653 | $182,709 | | |
| 2/20/2020 4 | | | 107,578 | $1,113,432 |
| | 3/1/2021 5 | 57,232 | $592,351 | | |
| 3/1/2021 6 | | | 87,163 | $902,137 |
| | 3/1/2022 5 | 127,699 | $1,321,685 | | |
| 3/1/2022 6 | | | 129,635 | $1,341,722 |
Gary D. Kain | | | | | |
| | 2/20/2020 3 | 62,817 | $650,156 | | |
| 2/20/2020 4 | | | 376,987 | $3,901,815 |
| | 3/1/2021 5 | 103,528 | $1,071,515 | | |
| 3/1/2021 6 | | | 157,658 | $1,631,760 |
| | 3/1/2022 5 | 119,187 | $1,233,585 | | |
| 3/1/2022 6 | | | 120,993 | $1,252,278 |
Christopher J. Kuehl | | | | | |
| | 2/20/2020 3 | 12,642 | $130,845 | | |
| 2/20/2020 4 | | | 77,175 | $798,761 |
| | 3/1/2021 5 | 35,767 | $370,188 | | |
| 3/1/2021 6 | | | 54,475 | $563,816 |
| | 3/1/2022 5 | 73,782 | $763,644 | | |
| 3/1/2022 6 | | | 74,900 | $775,215 |
Bernice E. Bell | | | | | |
| | 2/20/2020 3 | 10,152 | $105,073 | | |
| 2/20/2020 4 | | | 30,541 | $316,099 |
| | 3/1/2021 5 | 28,057 | $290,390 | | |
| 3/1/2021 6 | | | 21,045 | $217,816 |
| | 3/1/2022 5 | 35,473 | $367,146 | | |
| 3/1/2022 6 | | | 36,010 | $372,704 |
Kenneth L. Pollack | | | | | |
| | 2/20/2020 3 | 9,278 | $96,027 | | |
| 2/20/2020 4 | | | 27,926 | $289,034 |
| | 3/1/2021 5 | 24,225 | $250,729 | | |
| 3/1/2021 6 | | | 18,175 | $188,111 |
| | 3/1/2022 5 | 28,377 | $293,702 | | |
| 3/1/2022 6 | | | 28,809 | $298,173 |
1.Includes accrued dividend equivalent units.
2.Market value computed by multiplying the closing market price of our stock on December 30, 2022, or $10.35, by the number of units.
3.Time-based vesting RSUs vest ratably over a three-year and three-quarter month period that commenced on the Grant Date with the next vesting date on March 15, 2023.
4.Performance-based vesting RSUs which, subject to meeting the performance conditions calculated over a three-year period, cliff vest three years from the Grant Date. Reflects performance achievement of 100% of target.
5.Time-based vesting RSUs vest ratably over a three-year and one-half month period that commenced on the Grant Date with the next vesting date on March 15, 2023.
6.Performance-based vesting RSUs which, subject to meeting the performance conditions calculated over a three-year period, cliff vest two years and eleven and one-half months from the Grant Date. Assumes performance achievement at 50% of target.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 47 |
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 2022
The following table provides information about stock awards under the 2016 Equity Plan that vested in 2022 for each NEO:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Stock Awards |
| Name | Number of shares
acquired on vesting (#) | Value realized on vesting ($) |
Peter J. Federico | 162,183 | $2,185,524 |
Gary D. Kain | 759,697 | $10,360,277 |
Christopher J. Kuehl | 121,283 | $1,637,167 |
Bernice E. Bell | 72,318 | $971,797 |
Kenneth L. Pollack | 69,832 | $939,728 |
Severance and Change of Control Payments
Employment Agreements
Each of the employment agreements with Ms. Bell and Messrs. Kain, Federico, Kuehl, and Pollack contains provisions for payments upon certain events as set forth below. In the event of a termination by the Company of any of our NEOs for Cause (as defined in their respective employment agreements), our NEOs are not entitled to receive any supplemental payments or incremental benefits.
Termination by the Board Without Cause or Termination by the Executive for Good Reason
If the employment of Ms. Bell or Messrs. Kain, Federico, Kuehl, or Pollack terminates by reason of a Termination Without Cause or Termination For Good Reason, each as defined in their employment agreements, and such termination does not occur during the 21-month period (24 months in the case of Ms. Bell or Mr. Pollack) following a Change of Control, each such executive would be entitled to the following payments from the Company, as applicable, in addition to the payments listed below under “All Terminations” (a) an amount equal to the product of (i) 1.5 for Messrs. Federico, Kain or Kuehl or 1.0 for Ms. Bell or Mr. Pollack, multiplied by (ii) the sum of (A) the executive’s annual base salary at the time of such termination, plus (B) the target value of the executive’s annual cash bonus for the year in which such termination occurs (the “Severance Amount”), paid over 18 months for Messrs. Federico, Kain, and Kuehl, and 12 months to Ms. Bell and Mr. Pollack, respectively; (b) a pro rata portion of the annual cash bonus the executive would have been entitled to receive if he or she had remained employed through December 31 of the year in which such termination occurs (as determined by the Compensation Committee but assuming that all qualitative and subjective performance metrics were achieved at their target level); (c) reimbursements under COBRA, or substitute payments, for the executive and his or her eligible dependents for up to 18 months in the case of Messrs. Federico, Kain and Kuehl and 12 months in the case of Ms. Bell and Mr. Pollack; and (d) acceleration of any outstanding unvested equity awards. Mr. Kain’s Severance Amount (and his eligibility for reimbursements under COBRA or substitute payments) was proportionally reduced for each month that he remained employed between July 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022, and, as of December 31, 2022, the Severance Amount for Mr. Kain is $0.
Termination by the Board Without Cause or Termination by the Executive For Good Reason Following a Change of Control
If the employment of Ms. Bell or Messrs. Kain, Federico, Kuehl, or Pollack terminates by reason of a Termination Without Cause or Termination For Good Reason, and such termination occurs during the 21-month period following a Change of Control (24 months in the case of Ms. Bell and Mr. Pollack), as defined in their employment agreements, each such executive would be entitled to the following (as applicable), in addition to the payments listed below under “All Terminations”: (a) an amount equal to the product of (i) 2.0 (for Messrs. Federico or Kuehl) or 1.5 (for Ms. Bell and Messrs. Kain, or Pollack), multiplied by (ii) the sum of (A) the executive’s annual base salary at the time of such termination, plus (B) the target value of the executive’s annual cash bonus for the year in which such termination occurs, paid in a lump sum; (b) a pro rata portion of the target value of his or her annual cash bonus for the year in which such termination occurs; (c) COBRA reimbursements (or substitute payments) for the executive and his or her eligible dependents for up to 18 months; and (d) acceleration of any outstanding unvested equity awards. The amount payable to Mr. Kain as described in clause (a) of this paragraph (and his eligibility for reimbursements under COBRA or substitute payments) was proportionally reduced for each month that he remained employed between July 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022, and, as of December 31, 2022, this amount is $0.
Death or Disability
If the employment period of Ms. Bell or Messrs. Kain, Federico, Kuehl, or Pollack terminates early by reason of death or disability, each executive (or his or her estate or eligible dependents, if applicable) is entitled to receive, in addition to the payments listed below under “All Terminations”: (i) a pro rata portion of the annual cash bonus the executive would have been entitled to receive if he or she had remained employed through December 31 of the year in which such termination occurs (as determined by the Compensation Committee but assuming that the executive achieved all qualitative and subjective performance metrics at their target level), payable in a lump sum; (ii) COBRA reimbursements (or substitute payments) for the executive and his or her eligible dependents for up to 18 months (12 months in the case of Ms. Bell and Mr. Pollack); and (iii) acceleration of any outstanding unvested equity awards. After July 1, 2021, the eligibility of Mr. Kain and his eligible dependents to COBRA reimbursements or substitute payments was proportionately reduced for each month that he remained employed between July 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022, and as of December 31, 2022, Mr. Kain is no longer eligible for COBRA reimbursements or substitute payments.
| | | | | |
48 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
Voluntary Termination
Pursuant to the terms of his amended and restated employment agreement, effective as of July 1, 2021, if Mr. Kain’s employment had terminated by reason of a voluntary termination before December 31, 2022 (with at least 90 days prior notice to the Board), (i) Mr. Kain’s unvested time-based LTI awards granted to him in 2021 or earlier would have vested in full upon such termination and (ii) his performance-based LTI awards granted in 2021 or earlier would have vested on the same terms as though Mr. Kain had remained employed for the remainder of the applicable vesting period. For a voluntary termination on or after December 31, 2022, Mr. Kain would also receive a pro rata portion of his annual cash bonus for the year in which his employment is terminated, and any unvested LTI awards granted in 2022 or later will be subject to the same accelerated vesting described above, except that, for such LTI awards granted in the year of the voluntary termination, such terms would only apply to a pro rata portion of the awards based on the number of full calendar months Mr. Kain was employed in such year. The continued vesting of any performance-based vesting described in this section shall only occur if Mr. Kain continues to comply with certain restrictive covenants contained in the agreement during such time.
All Terminations
If the employment period of Ms. Bell and Messrs. Kain, Federico, Kuehl, or Pollack terminates early for any reason, each executive is entitled to receive (i) any earned but unpaid base salary; (ii) any annual cash bonus that has been earned for a calendar year prior to termination but is unpaid (but only if not a Termination For Cause or (other than Mr. Kain) a voluntary termination by the executive for any reason other than Good Reason); (iii) any unpaid reimbursable expenses that have been incurred by the executive; (iv) any plan benefits which by their terms extend beyond termination of employment; and (v) any COBRA benefits generally available to employees.
In addition, each of the employment agreements contains a non-competition provision that prevents the officer from participating as an officer, employee, director, partner, stockholder, consultant or otherwise, in any type of business that engages in the Company’s business for a certain restricted period. Each of the employment agreements also contains a provision preventing the executive from soliciting any of our employees or interfering in a similar manner with our business during such restricted period.
Equity Plans
The 2016 Equity Plan includes “double-trigger” acceleration provisions with respect to the vesting of awards in connection with a Change of Control of the Company (as defined in the 2016 Equity Plan). Under the 2016 Equity Plan, the vesting of awards may accelerate in connection with a Change of Control where either (1) within a specified period the participant experiences a qualifying termination of employment or service, as applicable, in a manner described in the award agreement or (2) the award is not continued, assumed, or converted into a replacement award in a manner described in the applicable award agreement.
The following table summarizes the estimated payments to be made under the employment agreement for each NEO at, following, or in connection with any termination of employment, including by the Company without cause or by the executive for good reason, death or disability and upon a change of control. In accordance with SEC regulations, the following table does not include any amount to be provided to an NEO under any arrangement that does not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of the NEO and that are available generally to all salaried employees. Also, the following table does not duplicate information already provided in the outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end table, except to the extent that the amount payable to the NEO would be enhanced by the termination event. The amounts in the following table are hypothetical and based on SEC regulations. Actual payments will depend on the circumstances and timing of any termination.
In accordance with SEC regulations, for purposes of the quantitative disclosure in the following table, we have assumed that the termination took place on December 31, 2022, and that the price per share of our common stock is the closing market price as of December 30, 2022, which was $10.35.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 49 |
The information below constitutes forward-looking statements for purposes of the Private Litigation Securities Reform Act of 1995.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NEO Benefits and Payments
upon Termination | Termination by
Company Without
Cause or Termination
by Executive for
Good Reason 1
($) | Termination by
Company Without
Cause or
Termination by
Executive for
Good Reason, each in
connection with a
Change in Control 2
($) | Death or Disability
($) | Voluntary
Termination by
Executive without
Good Reason
($) |
Peter J. Federico | | | | |
Severance Amount | 6,750,000 | 9,000,000 | — | — |
Base Salary | — | — | — | — |
Cash Bonus 3 | 2,228,400 | 2,228,400 | 2,228,400 | — |
Accelerated Equity Awards 4 | 5,454,036 | 5,454,036 | 5,454,036 | — |
Insurance Benefits 5 | 49,422 | 49,422 | 49,422 | — |
TOTAL: | 14,481,858 | 16,731,858 | 7,731,858 | — |
Gary D. Kain | | | | |
Severance Amount | — | — | — | — |
Base Salary | — | — | — | — |
Cash Bonus 3 | 2,228,400 | 2,228,400 | 2,228,400 | 2,228,400 |
Accelerated Equity Awards 4 | 9,741,110 | 9,741,110 | 9,741,110 | 9,741,110 |
Insurance Benefits 5 | — | — | — | — |
TOTAL: | 11,969,510 | 11,969,510 | 11,969,510 | 11,969,510 |
Christopher J. Kuehl | | | | |
Severance Amount | 4,350,000 | 5,800,000 | — | — |
Base Salary | — | — | — | — |
Cash Bonus 3 | 1,512,000 | 1,512,000 | 1,512,000 | — |
Accelerated Equity Awards 4 | 3,402,469 | 3,402,469 | 3,402,469 | — |
Insurance Benefits 5 | 49,422 | 49,422 | 49,422 | — |
TOTAL: | 9,313,891 | 10,763,891 | 4,963,891 | |
Bernice E. Bell | | | | |
Severance Amount | 1,750,000 | 2,625,000 | — | — |
Base Salary | — | — | — | — |
Cash Bonus 3 | 1,001,250 | 1,001,250 | 1,001,250 | — |
Accelerated Equity Awards 4 | 1,669,227 | 1,669,227 | 1,669,227 | — |
Insurance Benefits 5 | 32,948 | 49,422 | 32,948 | — |
TOTAL: | 4,453,425 | 5,344,899 | 2,703,425 | |
Kenneth L. Pollack | | | | |
Severance Amount | 1,500,000 | 2,250,000 | — | — |
Base Salary | — | — | — | — |
Cash Bonus 3 | 801,000 | 801,000 | 801,000 | — |
Accelerated Equity Awards 4 | 1,415,777 | 1,415,777 | 1,415,777 | — |
Insurance Benefits 5 | 32,948 | 49,422 | 32,948 | — |
TOTAL: | 3,749,725 | 4,516,199 | 2,249,725 | |
1.Severance amounts are payable over a period of 18 months for Messrs. Federico and Kuehl and over a period of 12 months for each of Messrs. Kain and Pollack and Ms. Bell.
2.Severance amounts are payable in a lump sum on the first payroll date 60 days after termination.
3.Payable in a lump sum by March 15 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which termination occurs. Reflects cash bonus NEO is entitled to receive for fiscal year 2022 based on achievement of Corporate Scorecard measures and personal performance, as applicable.
4.Reflects performance achievement of 100% of target for February 20, 2020 performance-based vesting RSUs award. Assumes performance achievement at 50% of target for March 1, 2021 and March 1, 2022 performance-based vesting RSUs awards.
5.Insurance Benefits are based on the December 2022 monthly payment for Health, Dental and Vision coverage for each NEO.
| | | | | |
50 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
Pay Versus Performance
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we have prepared this pay versus performance disclosure, which serves to further demonstrate the alignment of our executive compensation program with stockholder interests.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on: | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Year | Summary Compensation Table Total for Current CEO ($) 1 | Summary Compensation Table Total for Prior CEO ($) 1 | Compensation Actually Paid to Current CEO ($) 1 | Compensation Actually Paid to Prior CEO ($) 1 | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs 2 | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-CEO NEOs 2 | Total Stock-holder Return 3 | Peer Group Total Stock-holder Return 3,4 | Net Income ($ in Millions) 5 | Relative Annual Economic Return 6 |
| 2022 | $7,646,700 | N/A | $3,653,990 | N/A | $4,266,463 | $1,425,320 | $81.01 | $69.20 | $(1,190) | (2.1)% |
| 2021 | $6,949,900 | $11,254,900 | $7,745,878 | $15,106,695 | $2,952,885 | $3,317,861 | $103.51 | $91.50 | $749 | 9.9% |
| 2020 | N/A | $15,826,500 | N/A | $13,076,972 | $3,623,342 | $3,153,609 | $98.36 | $77.80 | $(266) | 28.8% |
1.During 2022, our CEO was Peter Federico (“Current CEO”). During 2021, our CEOs were Peter Federico and Gary Kain (“Prior CEO”). Messrs. Kain and Federico each served as CEO of the Company for a six month period during 2021. Compensation totals during 2021 reflect the full-year compensation received by each of Messrs. Kain and Federico and do not reflect pro-rated payment for the period that each individual served as CEO. During 2020, our CEO was Gary Kain.
2.During 2022, our remaining NEOs consisted of Messrs. Kain, Kuehl and Pollack and Ms. Bell. During 2021, our remaining NEOs consisted of Messrs. Kuehl, Pas, and Pollack and Ms. Bell. During 2020, our remaining NEOs consisted of Messrs. Federico, Kuehl, and Pollack and Ms. Bell. For more details regarding how the amounts in this column are calculated, refer to the “Adjustments to Summary Compensation Tables to Determine Compensation Actually Paid" tables immediately below.
3.Total Stockholder Return and Peer Group Total Stockholder Return assumes $100 invested at December 31, 2019.
4.As permitted by SEC rules, the Peer Group referenced for purpose of the Total Stockholder Return comparison consists of the Bloomberg Mortgage REIT Index.
5.Reflects after-tax net income attributable to stockholders prepared in accordance with GAAP for each of the years shown.
6.The Company has designated “Relative Annual Economic Return” as its Company Selected Measure, as this is the largest financial component of our 2022 Corporate Scorecard and our most important financial measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in this table) used by us to link compensation actually paid to our NEOs to Company performance. Relative Annual Economic Return compares the economic return of AGNC to that of the average of the Agency REIT Peer Group. For purposes of AGNC's Corporate Scorecard, relative annual economic return is calculated on an October 1 - September 30 year, but consistent with the requirements of Regulation S-K, it is calculated for purposes of this table on a calendar year basis. Additional details regarding the calculation of Relative Annual Economic Return and the companies included in the Agency REIT Peer Group for 2022 are included in the discussion of our 2022 Corporate Scorecard on page 33. For 2020, the peer group consisted of NLY, ANH, ARR, CMO, DX, IVR, and TWO. For 2021, the component companies were NLY, ARR, CMO, DX, IVR, and TWO, although CMO was included only through September 30, 2021 as a result of its acquisition. ANH was not included in 2021 as a result of its acquisition.
Compensation Actually Paid represents the Summary Compensation Table Totals adjusted for the following items:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year 2022 |
| Adjustments to Summary Compensation Table Totals to Determine Compensation Actually Paid | Current CEO | Prior CEO | Average for Non-CEO-NEOs |
| Deduction for amounts reported under the Stock Awards Column in the Summary Compensation Table | $ | (4,500,000) | | N/A | $ | (2,262,500) | |
| Increase for fair value at year-end of awards granted during year that remain unvested as of year-end | $ | 2,663,407 | | N/A | $ | 1,339,108 | |
| Increase/(Deduction) for change in fair value from prior year-end to current year-end of awards granted prior to year that were outstanding and unvested as of year-end | $ | (2,009,058) | | N/A | $ | (1,669,332) | |
| Increase/(Deduction) for change in fair value from prior year-end to vesting date of awards granted prior to year that vested during year | $ | (147,059) | | N/A | $ | (248,419) | |
| Total adjustments | $ | (3,992,710) | | N/A | $ | (2,841,143) | |
| | | |
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 51 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year 2021 |
| Adjustments to Summary Compensation Table Totals to Determine Compensation Actually Paid | Current CEO | Prior CEO | Average for Non-CEO-NEOs |
| Deduction for amounts reported under the Stock Awards Column in the Summary Compensation Table | $ | (3,400,000) | | $ | (6,150,000) | | $ | (1,257,500) | |
| Increase for fair value at year-end of awards granted during year that remain unvested as of year-end | $ | 3,443,197 | | $ | 6,228,139 | | $ | 1,273,459 | |
| Increase/(Deduction) for change in fair value from prior year-end to current year-end of awards granted prior to year that were outstanding and unvested as of year-end | $ | 635,848 | | $ | 3,420,757 | | $ | 316,660 | |
| Increase/(Deduction) for change in fair value from prior year-end to vesting date of awards granted prior to year that vested during year | $ | 116,933 | | $ | 352,899 | | $ | 32,357 | |
| Total adjustments | $ | 795,978 | | $ | 3,851,795 | | $ | 364,976 | |
| | | |
| Year 2020 |
| Adjustments to Summary Compensation Table Totals to Determine Compensation Actually Paid | Current CEO | Prior CEO | Average for Non-CEO-NEOs |
| Deduction for amounts reported under the Stock Awards Column in the Summary Compensation Table | N/A | $ | (8,100,000) | | $ | (1,406,250) | |
| Increase for fair value at year-end of awards granted during year that remain unvested as of year-end | N/A | $ | 7,117,718 | | $ | 1,235,711 | |
| Increase/(Deduction) for change in fair value from prior year-end to current year-end of awards granted prior to year that were outstanding and unvested as of year-end | N/A | $ | (14,176) | | $ | (19,510) | |
| Increase/(Deduction) for change in fair value from prior year-end to vesting date of awards granted prior to year that vested during year | N/A | $ | (1,753,070) | | $ | (279,684) | |
| Total adjustments | N/A | $ | (2,749,528) | | $ | (469,733) | |
The following graph illustrates the relationship between compensation actually paid to our NEOs and AGNC’s total stockholder return on a cumulative basis assuming investment of $100 on December 31, 2019:
| | | | | |
52 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
The following graph illustrates the relationship between compensation actually paid to our NEOs and AGNC’s net income on an annual basis:
The following graph illustrates the relationship between compensation actually paid to our NEOs and AGNC’s economic return relative to the AGNC Peer Group on an annual basis:
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 53 |
The relationship between AGNC’s total stockholder return and the total stockholder return of The Bloomberg Mortgage REIT Index on a cumulative basis is shown below:
Since its adoption in 2016, our current compensation program has linked the compensation of our NEOs to achievement of short- and long-term financial and strategic goals. Our 2022 Corporate Scorecard consists 75% of financial metrics and 25% of strategic and operational measures. A significant percentage of our NEOs’ compensation is in the form of equity awards that vest over three years, and in 2022, 67% of these awards to NEOs were performance vesting. In 2022, incentive compensation served as a material element of each NEO’s compensation package and serves to further align compensation to Company performance. The most important financial performance measures utilized by the Compensation Committee to link compensation paid to our NEOs to AGNC's performance for 2022 were:
•Annual Economic Return Relative to the Agency REIT Peer Group
•Absolute Annual Economic Return
•Ratio of Price-to-Tangible Book Value Relative to the Agency REIT Peer Group
| | | | | |
54 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
CEO Compensation Pay Ratio
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we determined that the 2022 total compensation of Peter Federico, our President and Chief Executive Officer, of $7,646,700 was approximately 25.48 times the total compensation of a median employee in 2022 of $300,104.
We identified the median employee using the annual base salary and expected bonus, as of December 31, 2022, plus any long-term incentive stock awards granted in 2022 for all individuals, excluding our Chief Executive Officer, who were employed by us on December 31, 2022, the last day of our payroll year (whether employed on a full-time, part-time, or seasonal basis). After identifying the median employee, we calculated annual total compensation for such employee using the same methodology we used for determining the CEO Compensation shown in the Summary Compensation Table.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 55 |
| | |
| INFORMATION REGARDING COMPANY VOTING SECURITIES |
INFORMATION REGARDING COMPANY VOTING SECURITIES
Security Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth, as of February 24, 2023 (unless otherwise indicated), the beneficial ownership of common stock of each current director, each nominee for director, each of our named executive officers, our executive officers and directors as a group, and each stockholder known to management to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that the beneficial owners set forth in the table below have sole voting and investment power. As of February 24, 2023, there were 575,078,356 shares of our common stock outstanding.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned 1 | | Percentage of
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned |
Beneficial Owners of more than 5%: | | | |
The Vanguard Group 2 | 54,355,072 | | 9.5% |
100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 | | | |
BlackRock, Inc.3 | 32,777,157 | | 5.7% |
55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | | | |
Directors and Named Executive Officers: 4 | | | |
| Peter J. Federico | 477,528 | | * |
Gary D. Kain 5 | 1,746,681 |
| * |
| Christopher J. Kuehl | 495,343 | | * |
| Donna J. Blank | — | | * |
| Bernice E. Bell | 73,752 | | * |
| Morris A. Davis | 7,350 | | * |
| John D. Fisk | 20,773 | | * |
| Andrew A. Johnson, Jr. | — | | * |
| Prue B. Larocca | 63,032 | | * |
| Paul E. Mullings | — | | * |
| Kenneth L. Pollack | 24,192 | | * |
| Frances R. Spark | 21,527 | | * |
| Directors and Executive Officers as a group (13 persons) | 3,001,268 | | * |
* Less than one percent.
1.The amounts shown reflect shares of our common stock. Mr. Kain also owns 10,900 shares of our 6.875% Series D Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred Stock”), representing less than one percent of the shares of Series D Preferred Stock issued and outstanding as of February 24, 2023. Holders of Series D Preferred Stock generally do not have any voting rights. Other than Mr. Kain’s ownership of Series D Preferred Stock, our Directors and executive officers do not own shares of our 7.00% Series C Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 6.875%, Series D Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 6.50% Series E Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 6.125% Series F Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, or Series G Fixed-Rate-Reset Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.
2.This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023 by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”), as an investment adviser. Vanguard is the beneficial owner of 54,355,072 shares and has the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 53,216,704 of such shares, shared power to dispose or direct the disposition of 1,138,368 of such shares, and shared power to vote or direct the vote of 256,477 of such shares.
3.This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 1, 2023 by BlackRock, Inc., as a parent holding company or control person of certain named funds (“BlackRock”). BlackRock is the beneficial owner of 32,777,157 shares and has the sole power to dispose or direct the disposition of 32,777,157 of such shares and sole power to vote or direct the vote of 30,893,478 of such shares.
4.The address of each of the executive officers and directors listed above is c/o AGNC Investment Corp., 2 Bethesda Metro Center, 12th Floor, Bethesda, MD 20814.
5.Includes 667,920 shares held in a family trust over which shares Mr. Kain has voting and dispositive power.
| | | | | |
56 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
| | |
| INFORMATION REGARDING COMPANY VOTING SECURITIES |
Delinquent Section 16(a) Report
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, as well as beneficial owners of more than 10% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, to file reports regarding their ownership and subsequent changes to their ownership with the SEC. Based solely on a review of copies of reports filed for 2022 and written representations from reporting persons, we believe that for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, all required reports under Section 16(a) were filed on a timely basis with the exception of one Form 4 report related to a single transaction to withhold shares for taxes that was filed late for Mr. Kain due to an administrative error.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 57 |
| | |
| QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS AND PROPOSALS |
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS AND PROPOSALS
1. WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS?
The Board is of the view that management is primarily responsible for all communications on behalf of AGNC with stockholders and the public at large. Thus, in addition to our executive officers, we employ a Vice President, Investor Relations, whose primary responsibilities include investor and stockholder relations.
2. HOW DO I COMMUNICATE WITH THE COMPANY’S BOARD?
Stockholders who wish to communicate with our Board or with a particular director may send a letter to our Secretary at AGNC Investment Corp., 2 Bethesda Metro Center, 12th Floor, Bethesda, MD 20814. Any communication should clearly specify that it is intended to be made to the entire Board or to one or more particular director(s).
Under this process, our Secretary reviews all such correspondence and will forward to the Board a summary of all such correspondence and copies of all correspondence that, in the opinion of the Secretary, deals with the functions of the Board or committees thereof or that he otherwise determines requires their attention. Directors may at any time review a log of all correspondence received by AGNC that is addressed to members of the Board and request copies of any such correspondence. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters are immediately brought to the attention of the Chair of the Audit Committee and handled in accordance with procedures approved by the Board with respect to such matters.
A copy of such procedures for the submission and handling of complaints or concerns regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters is included in our Code of Ethics, which is published in the Investors section of our web site at ir.agnc.com/corporate-governance-documents.
3. HOW CAN A STOCKHOLDER NOMINATE A DIRECTOR OR SUBMIT A PROPOSAL FOR THE 2024 ANNUAL MEETING?
Stockholder proposals or nominees for election to the Board must be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in our Bylaws and described in the following question, and not the procedures set forth in the preceding question.
4. HOW CAN A STOCKHOLDER SUBMIT A PROPOSAL FOR THE 2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS?
Proposals received from common stockholders in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act are given careful consideration by our Compensation Committee and our Board. If a common stockholder intends to present a proposal at the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, in order for such stockholder proposal to be included in our proxy statement and proxy card for that meeting, the stockholder proposal must be received by our Secretary at AGNC Investment Corp., 2 Bethesda Metro Center, 12th Floor, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, on or before November 11, 2023, unless the date of the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders has been changed by more than 30 days from April 20, 2024, in which event the deadline is a reasonable time before we begin to print and send our proxy materials.
If such proposal is in compliance with all of the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, the proposal will be included in our proxy statement and proxy card relating to such meeting. Nothing in the response to this question shall be deemed to require us to include any stockholder proposal that does not meet all the requirements for such inclusion established by the SEC in effect at that time.
In order for a proposal by a common stockholder submitted outside of Rule 14a-8, including any nominations for election to the Board made by common stockholders, to be considered at the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, such proposal must be made by written notice (setting forth the information required by our current Bylaws) and received by our Secretary not less than 90 and not more than 120 days in advance of the 2024 annual meeting.
Such proposals should be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested.
5. HOW CAN I OBTAIN A COPY OF THE COMPANY’S 2022 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND OTHER SEC FILINGS?
A copy of our 2022 annual report on Form 10-K containing audited financial statements was delivered or made available with this proxy statement. Additional copies of our 2022 annual report on Form 10-K (without exhibits, unless otherwise requested) are available in print, free of charge, to stockholders requesting a copy by writing to: AGNC Investment Corp., Investor Relations, 2 Bethesda Metro Center, 12th Floor, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, or by calling (301) 968-9300. You may review our filings with the SEC by visiting the SEC’s home page on the internet at http://www.sec.gov or by visiting the Investors section of our web site at ir.agnc.com/financial-information/sec-filings.
| | | | | |
58 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
| | |
| QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING |
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
1. WHY DID I RECEIVE THESE PROXY MATERIALS?
Our Board is furnishing this proxy statement to you to solicit proxies on its behalf to be voted at the 2023 Annual Meeting on Thursday, April 20, 2023, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time. This year’s Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format only through a live audio webcast. The proxies also may be voted at any postponement or adjournment of the meeting.
All properly executed written proxies, and all properly completed proxies submitted by telephone or by the internet, that are timely delivered pursuant to this solicitation, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions given in the proxy unless the proxy is revoked before the completion of voting at the meeting.
2. WHAT ITEMS WILL BE CONSIDERED AND VOTED ON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?
| | | | | |
| Proposal | Board
Recommendations |
1) Election of nine directors, each to serve a one-year term and until his or her successor is elected and qualified | FOR each of the nominees of the Board of Directors |
2) Approval of an advisory resolution on executive compensation | FOR the advisory resolution |
3) Approval of an advisory resolution on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation | FOR “Every Year” |
4) Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent public accountant for the year ending December 31, 2023 | FOR the ratification of appointment |
| 5) Approval of amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation eliminating supermajority voting requirements for stockholders to: | |
A.amend certain provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation | FOR the proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation |
| B. amend our Bylaws | FOR the proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation |
| C. remove directors | FOR the proposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation |
The Board does not intend to bring other matters before the Annual Meeting except items incidental to the conduct of the meeting. However, on all other matters properly brought before the meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof, by the Board or others, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card, or their substitutes, will vote in accordance with their discretion.
3. WHAT IS A PROXY?
It is your legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document is also called a proxy or a proxy card. Peter J. Federico and Kenneth L. Pollack have been designated as proxies by the Board for the Annual Meeting.
4. WHAT IS THE RECORD DATE AND WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
The record date for the Annual Meeting is February 24, 2023 (the “record date”). The record date is established by the Board and only common stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to:
a. receive notice of the meeting; and
b. vote at the meeting and any postponement or adjournment of the meeting.
Each common stockholder of record on the record date is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held. On the record date, there were 575,078,356 shares of common stock outstanding.
5. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD AND A STOCKHOLDER WHO HOLDS STOCK IN STREET NAME?
If your shares of common stock are registered in your name on the books and records of our transfer agent, you are a common stockholder of record.
If your shares of common stock are held for you through an intermediary in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, your shares are held in street name. The answer to Question 10 below describes brokers’ discretionary voting authority and when your
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 59 |
| | |
| QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING |
broker, bank, or other nominee is permitted to vote your shares of common stock without instructions from you. For shares held through a benefit or compensation plan or a broker, bank, or other nominee, you may vote by submitting voting instructions to your plan trustee, broker, bank, or nominee. If you attend the virtual Annual Meeting, you may withdraw your proxy and vote online during the meeting using your 16-digit control number included on your notice, proxy card, or the voting instruction form.
It is important that you vote your shares of common stock if you are a stockholder of record and, if you hold shares in street name, that you provide appropriate voting instructions to your broker, bank, or other nominee as discussed in the answer to Question 10 below.
6. WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT METHODS THAT I CAN USE TO VOTE MY SHARES OF COMMON STOCK?
You may submit your proxy or vote your shares of our common stock by any of the following methods:
By Telephone or the Internet—Common stockholders can vote their shares via telephone or the internet as instructed in the proxy card or the voting instruction form. The telephone and internet procedures are designed to authenticate a stockholder’s identity, to allow common stockholders to vote their shares, and to confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded.
By Mail—A common stockholder who receives a paper proxy card or voting instruction form or requests a paper proxy card or voting instruction form by telephone or internet may elect to vote by mail and should complete, sign, and date the proxy card or voting instruction form and mail it in the pre-addressed envelope that accompanies the delivery of the proxy card or voting instruction form. For common stockholders of record, proxy cards submitted by mail must be received by the date and time of the Annual Meeting. For common stockholders who hold their shares through an intermediary, such as a broker, bank, or other nominee, the voting instruction form submitted by mail must be mailed by the deadline imposed by your broker, bank, or other nominee for your shares to be voted.
Online during the Meeting—Shares of common stock may be voted online during the Annual Meeting using the 16-digit control number included on your notice, proxy card, or the voting instruction form.
7. WHO COUNTS THE VOTES?
A representative of Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. will serve as the inspector of election and will receive and tabulate the proxies and certify the results.
8. WHAT IF A STOCKHOLDER DOES NOT SPECIFY A CHOICE FOR A MATTER WHEN RETURNING A PROXY?
Stockholders should specify their voting choice for each matter on the accompanying proxy. If no specification is made, such shares will be voted “FOR” the election of the nine director nominees, “FOR” the advisory resolution on executive compensation, for “EVERY YEAR” for the advisory resolution on the frequency of future advisory resolutions on executive compensation,“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent public accountant for the year ending December 31, 2023, and “FOR” the approval of amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation eliminating supermajority voting requirements.
9. WHAT DOES IT MEAN IF I RECEIVE MORE THAN ONE PROXY CARD?
It means that you have multiple accounts with brokers and/or our transfer agent. Please vote all of these shares.
We recommend that you contact your broker and/or our transfer agent to consolidate as many accounts as possible under the same name and address. Our transfer agent is Computershare Investor Services. Computershare’s address is P.O. Box 43006; Providence, RI 02940-3006; you can reach Computershare at 1-800-733-5001 (from within the United States or Canada) or 781-575-3400 (from outside the United States or Canada) or via their Investor Centre™ portal at www.computershare.com/investor.
10. WILL MY SHARES BE VOTED IF I DO NOT PROVIDE MY PROXY?
Stockholders of Record—If you are a stockholder of record (see Question 5 above), your shares of common stock will not be voted if you do not provide your proxy unless you vote online during the Annual Meeting. It is important that you vote your shares.
Street Name Holders—If your shares of common stock are held in street name (see Question 5 above) and you do not provide your signed and dated voting instruction form to your broker, bank, or other nominee, your shares may be voted by your broker, bank, or other nominee but only under certain circumstances. Specifically, under applicable rules, shares held in the name of your broker, bank, or other nominee may be voted by your broker, bank, or other nominee on certain “routine” matters if you do not provide voting instructions.
The only proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting that are considered a “routine” matter for which brokers, banks or other nominees may vote uninstructed shares is the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent public accountant. The other proposals (specifically, the election of director nominees, the approval of the advisory resolution on executive compensation, the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, and the amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation to remove supermajority voting provisions) are not considered “routine” under applicable rules, so the broker, bank, or other nominee cannot vote your shares on these proposals unless you provide to the broker, bank, or other nominee voting instructions for these matters. If you do not provide voting instructions on a non-routine matter, your shares of common stock will not be voted on the matter, which is referred to as a “broker non-vote.” It is, therefore, important that you vote your shares.
| | | | | |
60 | AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement |
| | |
| QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING |
11. ARE ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES COUNTED?
Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will not affect the outcome of the votes on Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 4 at the Annual Meeting. Approval of Proposal 5, the amendment of our Certificate of Incorporation, requires the affirmative vote of at least 66% of the shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Instructions to “Abstain” with respect to any of these amendments will be counted for purposes of determining the number of share represented and entitled to vote. Accordingly, an abstention will have the effect of a vote “Against” these amendments. Broker non-votes will also count as a vote “Against” these amendments. See Question 10 above for more information about broker non-votes.
12. HOW CAN I REVOKE A PROXY?
The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board and is revocable at any time prior to the voting of the proxy, by the filing of an instrument revoking it, or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, with our Secretary, addressed to our principal executive offices at 2 Bethesda Metro Center, 12th Floor, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. In the event that you attend the Annual Meeting, you may revoke your proxy and cast your vote personally online during the meeting.
13. WHO WILL PAY THE COST OF THIS PROXY SOLICITATION?
We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies on the accompanying form. In addition to the use of mail, our officers and employees may solicit proxies by telephone or email. Upon request, we will reimburse brokers, dealers, banks and trustees, or their nominees, for reasonable expenses incurred by them in forwarding our proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock. The Company has also retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the Annual Meeting and will pay D.F. King a fee of $10,000 for its services. In addition, the Company may pay D.F. King additional fees depending on the extent of additional services requested by the Company and will reimburse D.F. King for expenses incurred in connection with its engagement by the Company.
14. HOW DO I OBTAIN ADMISSION TO THE ANNUAL MEETING?
Attendance at the virtual Annual Meeting will be limited to common stockholders of record as of the close of business on the record date, February 24, 2023. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AGNC2023, you must enter the 16-digit control number which is located on your notice, proxy card, voting instruction form, or in the email sending you the Proxy Statement. If you are a beneficial stockholder, you may contact the bank, broker, or other institution where you hold your account if you have questions about obtaining your control number. Participants will be able to access the virtual meeting site 15 minutes before the meeting begins on April 20, 2023. Stockholders experiencing technical difficulties when logging into the virtual meeting platform may access technical assistance provided by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., the hosting platform for the Annual Meeting, toll-free in the United States at 1-844-986-0822 or internationally at 303-562-9302 beginning 15 minutes in advance of the meeting.
15. WILL STOCKHOLDERS BE ABLE TO ASK QUESTIONS AT THE MEETING?
The Annual Meeting will include a question and answer session and will address questions submitted in writing in advance of and during the virtual meeting. Common stockholders of record on the record date may submit questions at www.proxyvote.com beginning up to 24 hours in advance of the meeting. We will endeavor to answer as many questions submitted by stockholders as time permits. We reserve the right to edit profanity or other inappropriate language and to exclude questions regarding topics that are not pertinent to meeting matters or Company business in accordance with our rules of conduct for the meeting. If we receive substantially similar questions, we may group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition. Additional information regarding the rules and procedures for participating in the virtual Annual Meeting will be provided in our meeting rules of conduct, which stockholders can view during the meeting at the virtual meeting website.
16. HOW MANY VOTES MUST BE PRESENT TO HOLD THE ANNUAL MEETING?
In order for us to conduct the Annual Meeting, holders representing a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote as of the close of business on the record date must be present online or by proxy at the meeting. This is referred to as a quorum.
Your shares are counted as present at the Annual Meeting if you attend the virtual meeting online and vote in person or if you properly return a proxy by internet, telephone, or mail.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be considered present for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board does not intend to bring other matters before the Annual Meeting except items incidental to the conduct of the meeting. However, on all other matters properly brought before the meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof, by the Board or others, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card, or their substitutes, will vote in accordance with their discretion.
| | | | | |
AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. - Proxy Statement | 61 |
PROPOSED AMENDED PROVISIONS OF THE AGNC INVESTMENT CORP. AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
APPENDIX A
The proposed amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority voting requirement applicable to an amendment of our Certificate of Incorporation (Proposal 4A) is set forth below.
ARTICLE XII
AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
The Corporation hereby reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained in this Certificate of Incorporation. Except as may be provided in a resolution or resolutions providing for any class of Preferred Stock pursuant to Article IV hereof and which relate to such class of Preferred Stock and except as provided in Article IV hereof, any such amendment, alteration, change or repeal shall require the affirmative vote of both (a) a majority of the members of the Board of Directors then in office and (b) a majority of the combined voting power of all of the shares of all classes of capital stock of the Corporation then entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.
By a vote of the majority of the Board of Directors then in office, the Board of Directors may adopt a resolution providing that at any time prior to the filing of the amendment with the Secretary of State, notwithstanding authorization of the proposed amendment by the stockholders, the Board of Directors may abandon such proposed amendment without further action by the stockholders.
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Certificate of Incorporation to the contrary, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least sixty-six percent (66%) of the combined voting power of all of the shares of all classes of capital stock of the Corporation then entitled to vote shall be required to amend, repeal or adopt any provision inconsistent with Article V herein.
APPENDIX B
The proposed amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority voting requirement applicable to an amendment of our By-laws (Proposal 4B) is set forth below.
ARTICLE XI
AMENDMENT OF BY-LAWS
The Board of Directors shall have power to adopt, amend, alter, change and repeal any By-laws by a vote of the majority of the Board of Directors then in office. In addition to any requirements of the General Corporation Law (and notwithstanding the fact that a lesser percentage may be specified by the General Corporation Law), any adoption, amendment, alteration, change or repeal of any By-laws by the stockholders of the Corporation shall require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least sixty-six percent (66%)a majority of the combined voting power of all of the shares of all classes of capital stock of the Corporation then entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.
APPENDIX C
The proposed amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority voting requirement to remove directors (Proposal 4C) is set forth below.
Section 5.5 Removal of Directors. Except as may be provided in a resolution or resolutions providing for any class of Preferred Stock pursuant to Article IV hereof, with respect to any directors elected by the holders of such class, any director, or the entire Board of Directors, may be removed from office at any time with or without cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least sixty-six percent (66%)a majority of the voting power of all of the shares of capital stock of the Corporation then entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class.
AGNC Investment (NASDAQ:AGNCP)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Nov 2024 até Dez 2024
AGNC Investment (NASDAQ:AGNCP)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Dez 2023 até Dez 2024
