UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to
.
Commission file number: 0-21643
CV THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
43-1570294
|
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
3172 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, California 94304
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (650) 384-8500
Securities registered
pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.001
Par Value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check whether the
Registrant (1) has filed all reports to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained
to the best of the Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
|
|
x
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
|
¨
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
|
¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
|
¨
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes
¨
No
x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such
common equity, was $503,128,161 as of June 30, 2008.
As of February 19, 2009, there were 64,234,229 shares of the
registrants common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
CV THERAPEUTICS, INC.
FORM 10-K/A
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
EXPLANATORY NOTE
We are filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this Amendment) to amend our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) on February 25, 2009 (the 10-K). The principal purpose of this Amendment is to include in Part III the information that was to be incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders. This Amendment hereby amends Part III, Items 10 through 14. We are also including as exhibits the certifications required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Except as otherwise expressly stated herein, this Amendment does not reflect events occurring after the date of the 10-K, nor does it modify or update
the disclosure contained in the 10-K in any way other than as required to reflect the amendments discussed above and reflected below. Accordingly, this Amendment should be read in conjunction with the 10-K and our other filings made with the SEC on
or subsequent to February 25, 2009.
3
PART III
Item 10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
DIRECTORS
The names of the members of our Board of Directors, their ages and certain information about them as of March 16, 2009, are
set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Director
|
|
Age
|
|
Principal Occupation
|
|
Director
Since
|
Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
60
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Science Officer
|
|
1992
|
|
|
|
|
Santo J. Costa
|
|
63
|
|
Retired Vice Chairman, Quintiles Transnational Corp.
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph M. Davie, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
69
|
|
Retired Senior Vice President Department of Research, Biogen, Inc. (now Biogen Idec)
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas L. Gutshall
|
|
71
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors of Cepheid
|
|
1994
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth B. Lee, Jr.
|
|
61
|
|
General Partner of Hatteras Ventures
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas E. Shenk, Ph.D.
|
|
62
|
|
Elkins Professor of Molecular Biology, Princeton University
|
|
2004
|
Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D.,
was a founder of the Company and has served as the Chairman of the Board of
Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Science Officer since 1992. Dr. Lange has served as a trustee on the University of Rochester Board of Trustees since May 1997, a member of the governing body of the Emerging Company Section of the
Biotechnology Industry Organization since February 1999, and serves on the boards of directors of Maxygen, Inc. and several private companies. From 1980 to 1992, Dr. Lange served on the faculty of Washington University School of Medicine,
including as Chief of Cardiology at Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri from 1985 to 1992, and as a Professor of Medicine from 1990 until 1992. Dr. Lange holds an M.D. from Harvard Medical School and a Ph.D. in Biological Chemistry from
Harvard University.
Santo J. Costa
has served as a director of the Company since May 2001. Mr. Costa has served as Of Counsel to the law firm
of Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell and Jernigan, LLP since August 2007. Prior to joining Smith Anderson, Mr. Costa was Of Counsel at the law firm of Williams Mullen from June 2001 to August 2007. Mr. Costa retired as Vice
Chairman of Quintiles Transnational Corp. in May 2001. While at Quintiles, Mr. Costa also served as President and Chief Operating Officer from 1994 until 1999. Previously, Mr. Costa served as Senior Vice President, Administration and
General Counsel of Glaxo Inc., where he sat on the companys board of directors. Previously, Mr. Costa was U.S. Area Counsel for Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. Mr. Costa started his career as food and drug counsel for Norwich/Eaton
Pharmaceuticals. Mr. Costa currently serves on the boards of directors of Labopharm Inc. and OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Mr. Costa also serves on the Board of Visitors of the Duke University Medical Center, the board of the Duke Cancer
Patient Support Program and the Duke Brain Tumor Advisory Committee. Mr. Costa holds a B.S. in Pharmacy and a J.D. from St. Johns University.
Joseph M. Davie, M.D., Ph.D.,
has served as a director of the Company since January 2006. Dr. Davie was Senior Vice President of Research at Biogen, Inc. (now Biogen Idec), a biopharmaceutical company, from 1993 to 2000, and
held several positions at G.D. Searle & Co., a pharmaceutical company, including President of Research and Development and Senior Vice President of Science and Technology, from 1987 to 1993. Dr. Davie was professor and head of the
Department of Microbiology and Immunology at Washington University School of Medicine from 1975 to 1987. He currently serves as a director of Targeted Genetics Corporation, Curis, Inc. and several privately held companies. Dr. Davie holds an
A.B., M.A. and Ph.D. in Bacteriology from Indiana University and an M.D. from Washington University School of Medicine.
Thomas L. Gutshall
has
served as a director of the Company since December 1994. Mr. Gutshall has served as Chairman of the board of directors of Cepheid, a diagnostics company, since 1996, and from August 1996 to April 2002, Mr. Gutshall also served as Chief
Executive Officer of Cepheid. From September 1996 to December 2002, Mr. Gutshall served as a consultant to the Company, and from January 1995 to September 1996, he served as the Companys President and Chief Operating Officer. From June
1989 until December 1994, Mr. Gutshall served as Executive Vice President at Syntex Corporation, a pharmaceutical and healthcare company.
4
Mr. Gutshall also serves on the board of directors of Cepheid and a private company. Mr. Gutshall holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the
University of Delaware and completed the Executive Marketing Management Program at Harvard Business School.
Kenneth B. Lee, Jr.,
has served as a
director of the Company since January 2002 and as the lead non-employee director since May 2008. Mr. Lee is a general partner of Hatteras Venture Partners, a venture capital firm. Mr. Lee served as President of A.M. Pappas &
Associates, an international life sciences venture development company, from January 2002 to June 2002. From September 1972 to December 2001, Mr. Lee was a partner and employee at Ernst & Young LLP and Ernst & Young Capital
Advisors, LLC. While at Ernst & Young, Mr. Lee served as head of their Health Sciences Investment Banking group from 2000 to 2001, as a Transaction Advisor of their Center for Strategic Transactions from 1997 to 2000, and as
Co-Chairman of their International Life Sciences Practice from 1995 to 1997. Mr. Lee formerly served on the Emerging Companies Section of the Board of the Biotechnology Industry Organization and on the Board of the California Healthcare
Institute. Mr. Lee currently serves on the boards of directors of Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pozen Inc. and OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Mr. Lee also serves on the Executive Committee of the Board of North Carolina Biotechnology Industry
Organization and the Board of Visitors of the Lineberger Cancer Center of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Mr. Lee holds a B.A. from Lenoir-Rhyne College and an M.B.A. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and is
a certified public accountant.
Thomas E. Shenk, Ph.D.,
has served as a director of the Company since December 2004. Dr. Shenk has been the
Elkins Professor of Molecular Biology at Princeton University since 1984 and is a world-renowned expert in virology and gene therapy with over 20 years of experience in the biopharmaceutical field. Dr. Shenk is a member of the National Academy
of Sciences, the Institute of Medicine, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the American Academy of Microbiology. He is a past president of the American Society for Virology and past president of the American Society for Microbiology, and
has published more than 240 scientific papers in various journals. Dr. Shenk is also a member of the boards of directors of Merck & Co., Inc. and Cell Genesys, Inc. Dr. Shenk, who trained as a postdoctoral fellow in molecular
biology at Stanford Medical Center, holds a B.S. in Viology from the University of Detroit and a Ph.D. in Microbiology from Rutgers University.
MANAGEMENT
The names of the Companys chief executive officer and each of the Companys other Named Executive Officers
identified in the 2008 Summary Compensation Table, below, as of the end of the last fiscal year, and their ages as of March 16, 2009, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
60
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Science Officer
|
|
|
|
Daniel K. Spiegelman
|
|
50
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
Brent K. Blackburn, Ph.D.
|
|
48
|
|
Senior Vice President, Drug Discovery and Development
|
|
|
|
Lewis J. Stuart
|
|
49
|
|
Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations
|
|
|
|
Tricia Borga Suvari, Esq.
|
|
48
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
See the section entitled Directors, above, for a brief description of the educational background and
business experience of Dr. Lange.
Daniel K. Spiegelman
has served as the Companys Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
since September 1999. From January 1998 to September 1999, Mr. Spiegelman served as the Companys Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From 1991 until 1998, Mr. Spiegelman was employed by Genentech, Inc., a biotechnology
company, holding various positions in the Treasury department, including the position of Treasurer from 1996 to 1998. Mr. Spiegelman currently serves on the boards of directors of Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Affymax, Inc. and Oncothyreon,
Inc. Mr. Spiegelman holds a B.A. in Economics from Stanford University and an M.B.A. from Stanford Graduate School of Business.
Brent K.
Blackburn, Ph.D.,
has served as the Companys Senior Vice President, Drug Discovery and Development since January 2004. From January 2002 until January 2004, Dr. Blackburn served as the Companys Senior Vice President, Drug
Discovery and Pre-Clinical Development. From June 2000 until January 2002, Dr. Blackburn served as the Companys Vice President, Drug Discovery and Pre-Clinical Development. From September 1997 until June 2000, Dr. Blackburn served as
the Companys Vice President, Developmental Research. From 1989 until 1997, Dr. Blackburn served in the Research Department at Genentech, Inc., a biotechnology company. From 1993 until 1997, Dr. Blackburn also served as the project
team leader for the oral GPII(b)III(a) antagonist project, a cardiovascular product, in the Development Department at Genentech. Dr. Blackburn holds a B.S. in Chemistry from Texas Christian University and a Ph.D. in Chemistry from the
University of Texas at Austin.
5
Lewis J. Stuart
has served as the Companys Senior
Vice President, Commercial Operations since July 2007. From July 2003 to July 2007, he served as the Companys Vice President, Sales. Mr. Stuart has more than 25 years of sales and marketing experience. Since 1990, he has held senior U.S.
and European sales and marketing positions within the biotechnology sector, including six years as vice president, sales, at Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Pfizer company. There, he fielded an HIV sales organization to launch Agourons lead
product, Viracept
®
, which became the most widely prescribed protease inhibitor in the United States. Earlier in Mr. Stuarts career, he directed the sales teams for several
cardiovascular products at Bristol Myers Squibb, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, including Capoten
®
, an ACE inhibitor prescribed to treat high blood pressure and congestive heart failure,
and Corgard
®
, a beta blocker prescribed to treat angina and high blood pressure. Mr. Stuart holds a B.A. in Marketing Communications from Virginia Tech (Virginia Polytechnic Institute
and State University).
Tricia Borga Suvari, Esq.,
has served as the Companys Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since
February 2007. From September 2006 to February 2007, Ms. Suvari served as the Companys Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary. From May 2000 to September 2006, Ms. Suvari served as the Companys Vice
President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary. From 1991 until 2000, Ms. Suvari was employed by Genentech, Inc., a biotechnology company, holding various positions in the legal department. From 1988 until 1991, Ms. Suvari was employed
by the law firm Irell & Manella LLP in Los Angeles. Ms. Suvari holds a B.S. in Geology and Geophysics from Yale College and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Section 16(a) of
the Exchange Act requires the Companys directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of the Companys equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and
reports of changes in ownership of the Companys common stock and other equity securities. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent (10%) stockholders are required by the SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms they file.
With the exception of the late filings on Form 4 described below in this paragraph, to the Companys knowledge,
based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable
to the Companys officers, directors and greater than ten percent (10%) beneficial owners were complied with. Dr. Louis G. Lange, a director and an executive officer of the Company, did not timely file a Statement of Changes in
Beneficial Ownership on Form 4 with the SEC in connection with distributions by the Company of restricted stock units (RSUs) to Dr. Lange pursuant to a grant on each of June 23, 2008 and September 22, 2008. A Form 4 for
each of these transactions was subsequently filed with the SEC on December 4, 2008. Lewis J. Stuart, an executive officer of the Company, did not timely file a Form 4 with the SEC in connection with a sale of shares of common stock of the
Company on November 20, 2008. A Form 4 for this transaction was filed with the SEC on December 10, 2008.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Code of Ethics and Committee Charters
The
Board of Directors has adopted a formal Code of Ethics that applies to all Company employees, officers and directors. The latest copy of the Code of Ethics, as well as the charters of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the
Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, are available in the Investors section of the Companys website at
www.cvt.com.
Any stockholder may request a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A and this Amendment without charge upon receipt of a written request identifying the person so requesting a report as a stockholder of our Company
at such date. Requests should be directed to: CV Therapeutics, Inc. 3172 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, California 94304.
Changes to Procedures by Which
Security Holders May Recommend Nominees to the Board of Directors
Pursuant to the Companys Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended and restated
on February 19, 2009, any stockholder recommendation for director nominee(s) shall set forth: (A) as to each Nominating Person (as defined in the Companys Amended and Restated Bylaws), (1)(a) the name and address of such
Nominating Person and (b) the class or series and number of shares of the corporation that are, directly or indirectly, owned of record or beneficially owned by such Nominating Person, except that such Nominating Person shall in all events be
deemed to beneficially own any shares of any class or series of the corporation as to which such Nominating Person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time in the future and (2) any Disclosable Interests (as defined in the
Companys Amended and Restated Bylaws), including any derivative, swap or other transaction or series of transactions engaged in, directly or indirectly, by such Nominating Person, the purpose or effect of which is to give such Nominating
Person economic risk similar to ownership of shares of any class or series of the corporation; (B) as to each person whom a Nominating Person proposes to nominate for election as a director, (1) all information with respect to such
proposed nominee that would be required to be set forth in a stockholders notice pursuant to the Companys Amended and Restated Bylaws if such proposed nominee were a Nominating Person, (2) all information relating to such proposed
nominee that is required to be disclosed in a proxy statement
6
or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election of directors in a contested election pursuant to
Section 14(a) under the Exchange Act (including such proposed nominees written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected), (3) a description of all direct and indirect
compensation and other material monetary agreements, arrangements and understandings during the past three (3) years, and any other material relationships, between or among any Nominating Person, on the one hand, and each proposed nominee, his
or her respective affiliates and associates and any other persons with whom such proposed nominee (or any of his or her respective affiliates and associates) is Acting in Concert (as defined in the Companys Amended and Restated Bylaws), on the
other hand, (4) a statement as to whether such proposed nominee, if elected, intends to tender, promptly following such persons election or re-election, an irrevocable resignation that will become effective upon the occurrence of both
(x) the failure to receive the required vote for re-election at the next meeting at which such person would face re-election and (y) acceptance of such resignation by the Board of Directors, and (5) a completed and signed
questionnaire, representation and agreement as provided in the Companys Amended and Restated Bylaws; and (C) any other information as may reasonably be required by the corporation to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to
serve as an independent director of the corporation or that could be material to a reasonable stockholders understanding of the independence or lack of independence of such proposed nominee.
Audit Committee
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008,
the Audit Committee was composed at all times of three (3) non-employee directors. Messrs. Gutshall and Lee served on the Audit Committee during the entire fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. Dr. McNeil served on the Audit Committee
until her departure from the Board of Directors in May 2008, and Dr. Shenk joined the Audit Committee in May 2008 immediately following Dr. McNeils departure. Mr. Lee served as Chair. The Board of Directors has determined that
all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent as that term is defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee also
satisfies the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors has further determined that Mr. Lee is an audit committee financial expert as defined by Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation
|
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
The compensation policies and programs that the Company utilizes in connection with compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as well as other executives and employees, are designed to achieve the following primary objectives:
|
|
|
to attract, retain and motivate the highest quality executives capable of leading the Company to achieve its business and strategic objectives;
|
|
|
|
to offer competitive compensation opportunities that reward corporate performance and individual contributions;
|
|
|
|
to create performance-based incentives for executive officers to achieve key business and strategic objectives of the Company; and
|
|
|
|
to align the interests of executive officers and stockholders through long-term equity compensation that motivates executive officers to contribute to the long-term
success and value of the Company for stockholders.
|
The Companys overall compensation program is structured to attract, motivate
and retain highly qualified executive officers by paying them competitively, consistent with the Companys success and their contributions to that success. Since the year 2000, the Company has grown from a biotechnology company focused on
research and development of potential products, with around 100 employees, into a fully-integrated biotechnology company with active commercial operations across the United States, broad on-going research and development efforts, general and
administrative personnel and over 500 employees (as well as a small European subsidiary).
The Company maintains its headquarters and many personnel in the
San Francisco Bay area, which is an urban area with a high cost of living and a highly competitive employment environment, in particular due to high concentrations of biotechnology companies and other high-growth and/or commercial employers that
compete for the same personnel that the Company seeks to attract, motivate and retain. Furthermore, there is high demand and relatively low supply on the West Coast of personnel with experience in a fully-integrated company with active commercial
operations. There are a limited number of commercially active companies in the Bay area and on the West Coast, and there are higher concentrations of personnel with commercial company experience in other geographic areas. These factors require the
Company to recruit, relocate, motivate and retain this talent from other areas of the country that may have lower costs of living.
7
The Company believes compensation should be structured to ensure that a portion of each executive officers
compensation opportunity will be directly related to and affected by the performance of the Companys stock and other factors that directly and indirectly influence stockholder value. Accordingly, the Company believes that long-term equity
incentive awards are a critical component of a compensation package in the biotechnology industry, and the Company employs a variety of different types of equity awards. In determining compensation, the Company considers the mix and relative balance
of total current or short-term compensation and potential long-term compensation in establishing each element of compensation.
In the case of the
Companys Named Executive Officers, the components of executive compensation used to support the Companys objectives are base salary, discretionary cash bonuses, discretionary incentive compensation consisting of equity awards (including
stock options, RSUs and stock appreciation rights), deferred compensation and defined contribution plans, and executive severance and change-in-control agreements. The Company entered into an employment agreement with its Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer in December 2005 that includes severance and change-in-control provisions, and amended this agreement effective in December 2007 (as described in greater detail above and below).
Compensation Committee Responsibilities and Processes
Compensation Committee Charter
Under the charter of the Compensation Committee (the Compensation Committee Charter), the
purpose of the Compensation Committee is to recommend compensation levels for Named Executive Officers and other officers and employees of the Company, and to administer the Companys equity incentive plans, as adopted by the Company from time
to time. Under the Compensation Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee has the full power and authority to establish salaries, incentives and other forms of compensation paid to Named Executive Officers and other officers and employees of the
Company, to administer the various incentive compensation and benefit plans adopted by the Board of Directors and stockholders of the Company from time to time, and to establish guidelines as directed by the Board of Directors pursuant to which the
Chief Executive Officer may administer the Companys equity incentive plans as to equity awards granted to the Companys employees and consultants (other than the Companys Named Executive Officers or any other officers, if any).
In practice, as described in greater detail in the next section, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (assisted by senior human resources personnel)
provides the Compensation Committee with information and recommendations relating to Company performance, individual performance and compensation, which the Compensation Committee reviews (in some cases with the full Board of Directors) in making
decisions regarding the base salary, bonus, equity awards and all other compensation awarded to the Companys Named Executive Officers. (As described in greater detail below, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is not present when the
Compensation Committee discusses or determines his compensation.) The Compensation Committee also considers such information and recommendations when the Compensation Committee provides advice and input as to the larger selected group of the
Companys senior management.
The Roles of Independent Compensation Consultants and Company Management
Historically the Compensation Committee has used independent compensation consultants to assist in various matters relating to compensation programs, policies and
processes. The use of compensation consultants is also intended to provide the Compensation Committee and the Companys management with an independent perspective on the Companys various compensation programs and on how to consider
determining appropriate levels of salary, bonus and other compensation elements at the Company.
In 2008, the Compensation Committee formally retained the
independent compensation consultant Radford Surveys + Consulting (an Aon Consulting Company). During 2008, this compensation consultant provided input to peer group criteria and development and benchmark data to the Compensation Committee and to the
Companys management with respect to the amounts and the nature of available data on compensation (including base salary, bonus and incentive payments, and equity awards) provided to executive officers at companies in an industry peer group
that was approved by the Compensation Committee. The consultant also provided services as requested in connection with executive compensation, equity compensation, and Board of Directors compensation. The consultant met with the Compensation
Committee in executive session without management on a number of occasions to provide support to the Compensation Committee in addressing various compensation decisions for the Named Executive Officers.
To aid the Compensation Committee in its work, the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (assisted by senior human resources personnel) provides the
Compensation Committee with a variety of information (including benchmarking data), analyses and recommendations relating to the Company, individual performance assessments and compensation determinations regarding all Named Executive Officers (as
well as the larger senior management group discussed with the Compensation Committee, as noted in the section above entitled Compensation Committee Charter). In preparation for reviews and decisions by the Compensation Committee, the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer tasks senior human resources personnel with project leadership for internal compensation efforts, which includes responsibility for integrating cross-functional input from human resources, finance and legal
functions (including outside advisers); this multi-functional approach incorporates input relating to effective performance management and motivation and retention of key employees, internal equity considerations, compliance with legal and benefit
plan requirements
8
and stockholder and third party compensation guidelines, tax and accounting treatment, disclosure and other legal requirements and appropriate transparency
to investors and stockholders, and employee and benefit plan communication and administration. While the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer participates in the Compensation Committees discussion and reviews related to the other members of
senior management (including other Named Executive Officers), neither he nor any other Company employees are present when the Compensation Committee discusses or determines his or her own compensation.
Annual Performance/Compensation Cycle
Consistent with the
Compensation Committee Charter, the Compensation Committee meets several times per year to review compensation policies and programs, review benchmarking information against approved industry peer companies, achieve alignment with Company management
on compensation objectives and strategy, and administer the various material incentive compensation and benefit plans of the Company. Among other matters, the Compensation Committee and Company management jointly establish an annual Compensation
Committee work plan. In addition, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer provides proposed annual Company bonus goals to the Board of Directors for review and approval, and the Board of Directors approves annual Company bonus goals with associated
weightings.
As part of the Companys annual focal performance review cycle for all of its employees, which typically occurs near or after year-end,
as discussed in greater detail below, the Compensation Committee (with input from the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Board of Directors) evaluates Company performance. The Compensation Committee also assesses the performance of Named
Executive Officers (and provides advice and input as to the larger senior management group noted above), based on input, assessments and recommendations from management as described above. The Compensation Committee approves salaries, incentives and
other elements of compensation for the Named Executive Officers.
Compensation Benchmarking, Targets and Peer Group
Each year, the Compensation Committee undertakes a review of the Companys compensation philosophy for the Named Executive Officers in addition to the criteria used
to identify specific peer group companies. The Compensation Committee works with the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in addition to senior human resource executives to understand the executive staffing needs of the Company, to
better understand the requisite skills required to be successful in leading and building its business. The Compensation Committee then works with its independent consultant to identify the appropriate criteria and companies that reflect the
Companys business model of bringing pharmaceutical products from research onto the market. The criteria and companies must also be consistent with the Companys stage of business operations and complexity, as well as the specific scope of
responsibilities that must be effectively managed in the Companys business model. In order to capture potential peers for consideration, the Compensation Committees independent consultant applies these factors to gather peer group
information relating to revenues, research spending and cash burn, organizational span of control (based on headcount) and market capitalization, to capture the potential peers for consideration. This comparison is intended to help ensure that the
Companys compensation practices remain competitive with other peer companies and the biotechnology market in general while simultaneously reflecting the limited market of commercial biotechnology companies that compete for experienced leaders.
This is a particularly important goal for compensation programs of the Company, given that the Company is headquartered and many personnel are based in a high-cost and highly competitive job market (the San Francisco Bay area), with high
concentrations of biotechnology companies and other employers (such as universities) and other types of high-growth businesses that compete for the same personnel that the Company seeks to attract, motivate and retain.
In regard to the Companys use of a peer group for compensation comparisons for senior management positions, the Companys practices continue to evolve to
reflect the Companys evolution as a commercial biotechnology company. In 2007, the target criteria used to select the peer group approved by the Compensation Committee included the following relevant general and industry-specific criteria:
having publicly traded stock, significant liquidity and a market capitalization of at least $500 million; being based in the United States with company headquarters in an area with a relatively high cost-of-living; being a fully integrated
biotechnology company with over 500 employees and a strong balance sheet; having a research and development pipeline focused on the discovery and development of product candidates with multiple candidates in clinical testing; being engaged in
marketing and sales of approved products (with its own field sales personnel) and generating annual product revenues of at least $50 million. In 2008, the Company remained similar in size at approximately 500 employees, while simultaneously opening
up several new revenues streams and significantly increasing its annual revenue potential. However, because of continued consolidation in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical markets, and the limited number of companies that have a similar business
profile to the Company, in 2008 it was decided to expand the peer group and examine a broader set of companies to benchmark executive compensation. This change was consistent with the Companys recruiting practices of seeking a broad array of
talent that comes from varied backgrounds with strong research, development and commercial organizations. The Compensation Committee also considered it important to examine companies that were similar in size to the Company and had management
positions of similar complexity, in order to effectively benchmark compensation levels of the Companys executives. Therefore, throughout the process of selecting the peer group, the Compensation Committee, with assistance from its independent
consultant, conducted an extensive review to examine the appropriate factors to use to develop the peer group for 2008. The Compensation Committee examined factors including market capitalization, revenue, employee size, research and development
expenditures, location, number of commercial products, and number of product candidates currently in clinical trials, to come up with the final peer list for 2008. The peer list of companies used in 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acorda Therapeutics
|
|
Celgene
|
|
Incyte Corp
|
|
Savient Pharmaceuticals
|
Alexion Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Cephalon
|
|
InterMune
|
|
Seattle Genetics
|
Alkermes
|
|
Cubist Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Isis Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Sepracor
|
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Endo Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Medarex
|
|
The Medicines Company
|
AMAG Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Exelixis
|
|
Myriad Genetics
|
|
Theravance
|
Amgen
|
|
Genentech
|
|
Onyx Pharmaceuticals
|
|
United Therapeutics
|
Amylin Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Genzyme
|
|
OSI Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals
|
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Gilead Sciences
|
|
PDL BioPharma
|
|
Viropharma
|
Biogen Idec
|
|
Human Genome Sciences
|
|
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Xenoport
|
BioMarin Pharmaceuticals
|
|
ImClone Systems
|
|
Rigel Pharmaceuticals
|
|
ZymoGenetics
|
9
While some of the companies on the 2008 peer list are larger than
the Company and are more established commercial biotechnology companies, others are much smaller and reflective of pre-commercial and emerging commercial biotechnology businesses. When reviewing the 2008 peer list in the aggregate, the target goal
was to be around the middle of the peer group or the 50
th
percentile across many of the quantifiable metrics listed above, including employee size,
market capitalization, revenues and research and development expenditures. The Compensation Committee used the Companys overall position within the peer group when approving actual pay levels to ensure that executives pay is competitive
within the broad range of the market from the 25
th
percentile up to the 75
th
percentile. The 2008 peer group was used as a guide for establishing market ranges, with each executives experience and actual performance also being taken into account in determining how to compensate the
individual executive relative to the market. The Compensation Committee also examined the internal relationship between the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executive Officers when determining actual pay levels. Going forward,
the Compensation Committee plans to review the peer group annually to ensure it accurately captures the Companys position and profile relative to the market, that it encompasses the talent market for leadership positions at the Company and is
adjusted to reflect the ongoing consolidation in the industry.
In addition, when considering the compensation of the Companys Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer relative to the 2008 peer group, as part of the peer group analysis a variety of factors and their impact on this executives compensation were examined, including revenues, number of employees, market capitalization and
research and development expenditures. When considering actual recommendations and determining final compensation levels regarding the compensation of the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for 2008, the Compensation Committee also
looked at other companies within the peer group that that had founder chief executive officers who oversee research and development activities.
Base
Salaries
The base salary element of compensation is intended to compensate the Companys Named Executive Officers competitively at levels
necessary to attract and retain qualified executives in the biotechnology industry. The base salary for each Named Executive Officer when newly hired is set on the basis of multiple factors, including the Named Executive Officers
qualifications, experience, prior salary, competing offers, internal equity compared to other relevant positions, and the salary levels for similar positions within comparable companies including the pre-approved peer group.
For the Named Executive Officers (and other senior management), in 2004 the Board of Directors approved a base
salary target at the 75
th
percentile of the peer group. This target was set in order to help ensure retention of key senior managers through the
anticipated transformation to a fully integrated, commercially advanced biotechnology company, despite historical challenges to the effectiveness of long term equity tools. However, base salary levels for the Named Executive Officers have lagged
behind this target due to the Companys phased migration approach, discussed above in Compensation Benchmarking, Targets and Peer Group. The Company presently expects to continue to migrate Named Executive Officer base salaries
toward this base salary target over time. The Compensation Committees determination of base salary for each Named Executive Officer depends not only on market data and individual performance but on Company growth relative to the pre-approved
peer group. In setting base salaries for Named Executive Officers for 2008, the Compensation Committee reviewed and interpreted data from the Radford Global Life Sciences Survey for 2008 as well as 2007 and 2008 publicly filed compensation data for
peer group companies. As a result of this approach, our Named Executive Officers do not each have identical base salary amounts. The Compensation Committee has reviewed the pay differences and is satisfied that such differences are appropriate in
light of the factors described above.
The base salaries for each of the Named Executive Officers for 2008 are set forth in the 2008 Summary
Compensation Table, below.
10
Performance-Based Compensation
Annual Bonus Goals and Policies
The Company structures its compensation programs with a goal of rewarding Named
Executive Officers based on the Companys performance and the individual executives contribution to achieving these results. In particular, each year the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer provides proposed annual Company bonus goals to
the Board of Directors for review and approval, and the Board of Directors approves annual bonus goals with associated weightings. As part of the Companys annual focal performance review cycle for all of its employees, which typically occurs
after year end, the Compensation Committee (with input from the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Board of Directors) evaluates the Companys performance overall for the given year against these approved bonus goals as well as other
significant Company performance factors, accomplishments and challenges. The Compensation Committee then determines whether to award bonuses (if at all) and sets bonus amounts and budgets (if any). The approved bonus goals are intended to correlate
(assuming they are accomplished) with resultant increased business value of the Company and for its stockholders. For this reason, the Companys approved bonus goals typically include goals tied to research, development and commercialization
milestones, such as the initiation or completion of clinical studies and the preparation for and launch of approved products and sales milestones; the approved goals may also include other indicators of Company performance, such as goals related to
key strategic factors or the Companys balance sheet strength. The weightings for the approved goals are intended to reflect relevant factors such as the relative importance of the goal to the Companys business and operations, the
potential impact in terms of near-term and long-term shareholder value, and the degree of difficulty expected to achieve the goal.
Typically near or after
year end, based on input and recommendations from the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee (in consultation with the Board of Directors) reviews Company performance overall against the pre-approved bonus goals, and also
typically reviews and takes into account other significant Company performance factors, accomplishments and challenges during the year. Evaluation of the goals and other relevant factors necessarily involves a subjective assessment of corporate and
individual performance by management and the Compensation Committee. Moreover, the Compensation Committee does not base its considerations on any single performance factor, but rather considers a mix of factors in evaluating Company and individual
performance, including performance on the pre-approved bonus goals as well as other significant performance factors, accomplishments and challenges during the year, the individual Named Executive Officers performance, and comparison with other
biotechnology peer companies as described above.
For the Named Executive Officers (and other senior management), in 2004 the Board of Directors approved a
bonus program which provides these senior managers the opportunity to earn multipliers of up to two (2) times their market-based bonus target (derived from the market average or median) in exceptional corporate performance years. This program
was designed to further motivate and provide performance-based incentives for the achievement of corporate goals, generate additional value for the Company and its stockholders, and help ensure retention of key senior managers through the
anticipated transformation to a fully integrated, commercially advanced biotechnology company, despite historical challenges to the effectiveness of long term equity tools. Specific multiplier amounts in any given performance year, if any, are
approved by the Compensation Committee.
For 2008, based on managements recommendation and its review of peer group data, the Compensation Committee
set individual Named Executive Officer target bonus (other than for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) at 40% of the Named Executive Officers base salary. Based on its review of peer group data, the Compensation Committee set the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officers target bonus at 100% of his base salary. The determination of Named Executive Officer bonuses is also based on assessments of individual performance and Company performance, as recommended by management
and approved by the Compensation Committee on the basis of the approved bonus goals and other significant factors using the process described above. (As noted above, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is not present when the Compensation
Committee discusses or determines his compensation.) In order to assess the total compensation picture and overall effectiveness in motivating and retaining Named Executive Officers, determination of Named Executive Officer bonuses is also based in
part on total cash compensation compared to peer group companies. This assessment is particularly important given that the Companys headquarters and many personnel (including Named Executive Officers) are located in the San Francisco Bay area,
which is a high-cost and highly competitive recruiting and retention environment.
2008 Cash Bonus Payments
Following the processes described above, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer proposed, and the Board of Directors approved, 2008 bonus goals and associated
weightings in February 2008 as part of the typical annual performance/compensation cycle. In April 2008, in lieu of potential product approval bonuses considered by the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors approved increasing the potential
2008 bonus pool for the Company by granting extra credit for the achievement of certain of the 2008 bonus goals previously approved by the Board of Directors, as follows: (i) the bonus score would be doubled for achievement of the previously
approved bonus goal for marketing approval of regadenoson, and (ii) the bonus score would be doubled for achievement of the previously approved bonus goal for European marketing approval of ranolazine.
11
The 2008 bonus goals as approved by the Board of Directors included and utilized in making 2008 bonus compensation
determinations included:
|
|
|
success in commercialization efforts as measured by product revenues;
|
|
|
|
obtaining marketing approval for improved angina labeling for Ranexa
®
(ranolazine) in the U.S. based on the MERLIN TIMI-36 clinical results;
|
|
|
|
marketing approval of Ranexa
®
(ranolazine) in Europe;
|
|
|
|
commencing a clinical trial of ranolazine in a specified indication;
|
|
|
|
obtaining marketing approval for regadenoson in the U.S.;
|
|
|
|
submitting a marketing approval application for regadenoson in Europe;
|
|
|
|
submitting an IND to allow for the advancement of a new program toward clinical development; and
|
|
|
|
achieving visibility to potential future profitability.
|
In December 2008, the Compensation Committee (with input from the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Board of Directors) met and reviewed overall Company performance against these pre-approved 2008 bonus goals.
In determining funding for the bonus program and individual Named Executive Officer bonus amounts the Compensation Committee (based on recommendations from the Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer in the case of other Named Executive Officers) assessed the individual performance of Named Executive Officers (and other members of senior management). Such individual performance assessments necessarily require
subjective judgments and assessments that take into consideration various factors, including the scope of authority, impact and responsibility of each individual, the experience and skills required to successfully perform each role, and such
individuals contributions to the Companys strong operational and regulatory milestone performance. Individual performance factors evaluated included the achievement of business function-specific goals that support corporate goals,
personnel management and employee development, leadership and organizational effectiveness, and significant unplanned accomplishments and challenges.
Based on the foregoing assessment of Company performance and these assessments of individual performance for the Named Executive Officers (and other members of senior management), management recommended, and the Compensation Committee
agreed, to fund the Companys 2008 annual discretionary bonus program at one hundred fifty-five percent (155%) of target funding for officers at the senior vice president level (including the Named Executive Officers other than the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer).
As a result of these approaches, our Named Executive Officers do not each have identical bonus amounts. The
Compensation Committee has reviewed the pay differences and is satisfied that such differences are appropriate in light of the factors described above.
Dr. Langes 2008 annual cash bonus was determined with reference to the Companys overall performance, as outlined above, Dr. Langes base salary, his individual performance as assessed by the Compensation Committee
(in consultation with the Compensation Committees independent consultant and the Board of Directors), the 2008 median target bonus percentage of chief executive officers in the above-discussed peer group, Dr. Langes projected
percentile rank and absolute rank order with respect to the peer group, and Dr. Langes projected total cash compensation for 2008 with respect to the peer group. As a result of the Compensation Committees determination and its
review, the final 2008 bonus amount for Dr. Lange was set at 200% of his target bonus.
The approved 2008 annual cash bonus amounts for each Named
Executive Officer are included in the amounts set forth in the 2008 Summary Compensation Table, below.
Discretionary Long-Term Equity
Incentive Awards
As discussed above, the Company believes that long-term incentive compensation consisting of equity awards are a critical component of
a competitive compensation package in the biotechnology industry. This is particularly true since the Company competes with high concentrations of local biotechnology and other employers and with biotechnology and other employers from lower cost of
living areas given the scarcity of local commercially-experienced talent, many of whom also grant equity awards, in trying to attract, motivate and retain Named Executive Officers and other key personnel. The Company also believes that equity awards
effectively reward employees for Company success over time and encourage retention of Named Executive Officers and other key employees by the Company. Over the past few years the Company has used several different types of equity awards with varying
vesting periods and other design features, as described in greater detail below.
12
Policies and Factors Relevant to the Companys Equity Grant Practices
The Companys 2000 Incentive Plan allows for the grant of stock options, RSUs and stock appreciation rights. As the Company has sharply increased in size and
complexity of operations over the past few years and as competitor companies have added restricted stock and RSUs as part of their compensation, the Company has moved away from a historic practice of using stock options as the primary form of equity
compensation to a practice of utilizing broad-based grants of RSUs along with option grants. For example, in 2005, the Company granted a blend of stock options, RSUs and stock appreciation rights to the Named Executive Officers (and other key
performers), and in 2006 and 2007 the Company granted a blend of stock options and RSUs to the Named Executive Officers (and other key performers). The Companys awards in these periods have utilized varied vesting periods, distribution dates
and other design features intended to ensure that Company executive equity practices were competitive in retaining and motivating Named Executive Officers and other key employees; these features are described in greater detail in the 2008
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table, below.
A number of factors have contributed to the Companys shifts to a higher use of RSU
grants and use of differing equity award designs. These factors include the desire to provide Named Executive Officers and other employees with the opportunity to receive and maintain an equity interest in the Company, to better align Named
Executive Officers and other employees with stockholders, as well as to increase the opportunity for employee and stockholder benefit through a diversity of types and designs of equity awards; the lesser dilutive impact of RSU grants (compared to
stock option grants) and overall available shares; stockholder preferences on equity award parameters; and changing accounting and tax implications for equity awards. Finally, a key driver over time has been under-performance of growth stocks
(including the Companys), which has contributed to the Companys historical pattern of having a significant percentage of options with exercise prices above the Companys stock price.
These practices are consistent with the equity policies and targets approved by the Board of Directors in 2004 to
help ensure retention of Named Executive Officers (and other senior management) through the anticipated transformation to a fully integrated, commercially advanced biotechnology company, despite historical challenges to the effectiveness of long
term equity tools. As a result, for equity grant purposes, the Company targets equity awards at the 50
th
to 75
th
percentile of the peer group.
In applying these equity targets and policies, as part
of the determination of what new equity awards, if any, to grant to each Named Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee assesses a mix of factors rather than just a single performance factor, as part of the process described above (which
includes including input, assessments and recommendations from management). These factors include those discussed above as well as the Companys accomplishments and significant challenges during the year, the individual performance of each
Named Executive Officer, each Named Executive Officers past and anticipated future contribution to the attainment of the Companys long-term strategic goals, and comparisons with other biotechnology companies and their equity award
practices. Such comparisons include Named Executive Officer total cash compensation, in order to assess the total compensation picture and overall effectiveness in motivating and retaining Named Executive Officers. This assessment is particularly
important given that the Companys headquarters and many personnel (including Named Executive Officers) are located in the San Francisco Bay area, which is a high-cost and highly competitive recruiting and retention environment. Other factors
taken into consideration include long-term incentives previously granted, including the type of previously granted awards, the amount of actual (vs. theoretical) equity value per year that has been derived to date by Named Executive Officers and
other senior management (a group who as of 2008 had an average tenure of nine (9) years and a strong track record in achieving corporate goals), the current actual value of each Named Executive Officers unvested equity grants, the
percentage of stock option grants with exercise prices greater than the Companys stock price, and the theoretical present value of equity grants as calculated for purposes of the Companys financial statements.
In connection with the restructuring of the Company in May 2007, including in the period that followed the restructuring, the Company took a number of equity-related
actions approved by the Board of Directors, with the goal and intention of stabilizing the Company and motivating and retaining key performers at all levels of the organization (including Named Executive Officers and other members of senior
management) remaining at the Company and responsible for the achievement of corporate goals with significantly reduced available resources. Specifically, in May 2007 the Board of Directors approved retention grants to key non-officer employees
(including field sales and key headquarters personnel), consisting of stock option grants and RSU grants; the Board of Directors approved the acceleration of vesting of all stock options with an exercise price of $10.00 or greater granted to
employees prior to May 31, 2007 (not including the May 2007 retention grants or any grants to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer); and the Board of Directors approved the cancellation of outstanding stock appreciation rights (other than
the grant to the Chairman and Executive Officer), subject to voluntary consent of each holder, in part to reduce future operating expenses. (All Named Executive Officers who were eligible to relinquish their stock appreciation rights in 2007
volunteered to do so.)
In addition, in August 2007 the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors approved key retention grants of stock options
and RSUs to the Named Executive Officers and other key officers in the senior management group, with vesting and other design features intended to enhance retention and motivation of these key employees. The size of these grants was formulated based
on a new hire grant plus an annual grant, and was intended to be a deterrent to attrition based on competitive new hire offers for key officer personnel deemed critical to the leadership and stabilization of the Company following the May 2007
restructuring. In approving these grants, the Board of Directors determined that the Named Executive Officers (and other key officers) would not receive any additional
13
performance-based equity replenishment grants in 2008 or 2009. In addition, each recipient of the August 2007 grants agreed to forego the usual single
trigger change-in-control provision embedded in the Companys equity plans (described below) in favor of specific double trigger change-in-control terms for these grants (which involves both a change in control of the Company
and the individuals loss of his or her job within a limited period of time following the change in control).
Because of the Board of Directors
prior determination not to provide any additional performance-based equity incentive grants in 2008 or 2009 to the Named Executive Officers, there were no grants of any equity awards to the Named Executive Officers during 2008.
The Company believes that stock options priced at the fair market value of the Companys stock strongly align the interests of its Named Executive Officer and other
employees with long-term Company performance and stockholder interests. Therefore, the Company has priced all of its stock option grants with exercise prices equal to the closing price of the Companys stock on the last trading day
prior
to the date of grant, which is how the Companys equity plan defines fair market value. The Company has never repriced stock options.
The Company
believes that its use of RSUs increases Named Executive Officer and other employee ownership in the Company, thereby better aligning employee interests with stockholder interests, and lessens the dilutive effect of equity grants (compared to stock
option grants). Also, because a significant portion of the Companys outstanding stock option grants to its Named Executive Officers and other employees have exercise prices above the current price of the Companys common stock, the
Companys RSU grants (which include vesting and distribution provisions) are intended to serve as an important retention tool for the Named Executive Officers and other employees.
The equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officers are described in the 2008 Summary Compensation Table and 2008 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table, below. As a result of
this approach, our Named Executive Officers do not each have identical long-term incentive compensation amounts. The Compensation Committee has reviewed the pay differences and is satisfied that such differences are appropriate in light of the
factors described above.
Timing of Equity Awards to Named Executive Officers
The Compensation Committees general practice is to review Named Executive Officer performance and to set annual compensation for the Named Executive Officers at the end of each annual performance period (as
described above). Historically, equity awards to the Named Executive Officers have generally been approved in connection with these annual reviews. Consistent with these practices, equity awards were granted to the Named Executive Officers in
December or January for the past several years, in conjunction with the annual performance review for Named Executive Officers. However, we have in the past and may in the future grant equity awards at other times of year, depending on business
needs. As noted above, the Named Executive Officers did not receive any grants of equity awards during 2008.
In general the Company does not plan to
coordinate grants of options so that they are made before announcement of favorable information, or after announcement of unfavorable information. Because the date for the Compensation Committees annual review of Named Executive Officer
performance and compensation is set well in advance, the Compensation Committee may approve grants of equity awards to Named Executive Officers at times when the Company is in possession of material non-public information. However, the Compensation
Committee does not use any such material non-public information to increase the potential value of equity awards to Named Executive Officers. Similarly, the Company does not backdate options or grant options retroactively; nor does it grant options
with any so-called reload feature or loan funds to any employees to enable them to exercise options.
Change-in-Control and Severance
Provisions
2000 Incentive Plan Provisions
The
Company makes equity award grants under the 2000 Incentive Plan and the 2004 Employment Commencement Incentive Plan (which is used only for new hire grants). Each of these plans has been approved by the Board of Directors, and the 2000 Incentive
Plan has been approved by the Companys stockholders. Each of these plans, along with each of the Companys other equity incentive plans, provides that each outstanding stock award under the plan shall automatically become fully vested
and/or exercisable with respect to all of the shares of common stock subject thereto upon a change of control of the Company, and the 2000 Incentive Plan also provides that all shares of common stock subject to outstanding RSUs under the 2000
Incentive Plan shall automatically be distributed to holders thereof upon a change of control of the Company. Each of these plans defines such change of control as a sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company, a merger or consolidation
involving the Company, or any transaction or series of related transactions in which more than fifty percent (50%) of the Companys voting power is transferred. The Company and the Board of Directors have determined that these provisions
are appropriate in order to encourage retention of equity award recipients through a change-of-control event, and to reward such recipients for their participation in the growth in the value of the Company. As noted above, the Board of Directors
made key retention grants of stock options and RSUs to the Named Executive Officers in August 2007 that are not subject to the single trigger vesting acceleration described below. These grants instead are subject to double
trigger vesting acceleration upon certain terminations of the Named Executive Officers employment as described below.
14
Severance and Change-of-Control Agreements
The Company has entered into executive severance arrangements in the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Dr. Lange (discussed in the next section below), as well as executive severance agreements with
each of its other Named Executive Officers. In addition, the Company has in place severance agreements for officers who are not Named Executive Officers, and a severance plan covering all of the Companys full-time employees. All of the
foregoing agreements, and the Company-wide severance plan, were approved by the Board of Directors.
The individual severance agreements with Named
Executive Officers (and other members of senior management) and the Employment Agreement with Dr. Lange, as well as the Company-wide group severance plan, are each intended to provide a retention incentive for our Named Executive Officers in
the event of a potential change in control transaction by providing each executive with severance payment entitlements sufficient to motivate them to remain employed through consummation of such a transaction instead of pursuing alternative
opportunities in the face of a potential change in control transaction. The Employment Agreement with Dr. Lange is the result of arms length negotiations regarding all of the material terms of the Employment Agreement; as part of these
negotiations the Compensation Committee utilized the services of an independent compensation consultant, Frederick W. Cook, Inc., which provided analysis regarding the terms of Dr. Langes agreement.
The executive severance agreements with each Named Executive Officer (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) provide that, in connection with a change of
control of the Company (as defined in the agreements), all outstanding stock options held by the Named Executive Officer shall automatically become fully vested and exercisable. In addition, as set forth in the 2000 Incentive Plan pursuant to which
all grants to Named Executive Officers that are currently unvested have been made, in the event of a change of control of the Company, each outstanding stock award under the 2000 Incentive Plan shall, automatically and without further action by the
Company, become fully vested and/or exercisable with respect to all of the Shares subject thereto, and all Shares subject to outstanding RSUs shall be distributed to holders thereof, no later than five (5) business days before the closing of
such change of control. However, in August 2007 the Named Executive Officers, including Dr. Lange, received grants of stock options and RSUs that waive these provisions of the 2000 Incentive Plan and provide instead, with respect to such August
2007 grants only, that such outstanding stock awards shall, automatically and without further action by the Company, become fully vested and/or exercisable with respect to all of the Shares subject thereto, and all Shares subject to such RSUs shall
be distributed to holders thereof, if the holder thereof has a separation from service from the Company that is a Covered Termination (as defined in the executive severance agreements with each Named Executive Officer other than Dr. Lange)
within 13 months following a change of control of the Company, or due to a termination without Cause or resignation for Good Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement with Dr. Lange).
In addition, under the severance agreements with each of the Companys Named Executive Officers (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), if the Named
Executive Officer has a separation from service from the Company that is a Covered Termination within thirteen (13) months following a change of control of the Company, the Named Executive Officer is entitled to receive additional severance
benefits, including the following: eighteen (18) months of the Named Executive Officers base salary at the time of termination and 150% of the Named Executive Officers annual bonus (if any) in the year prior to the change of
control; eighteen (18) months continued health benefits; and in the event that any benefits would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, an additional gross-up payment sufficient to cover all excise taxes
on such benefits as well as all taxes on the gross-up payment itself. Such benefits will terminate immediately if the Named Executive Officer, at any time, violates any proprietary information or confidentiality obligation of the Company. In March
2009, the Board of Directors amended the executive severance agreements to clarify that the bonus calculation described above applies to bonuses earned in the year prior to termination.
CEO Employment Agreement
In December 2005, the Company entered into the Employment Agreement with its Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer. The Employment Agreement was amended and restated in its entirety as of December 1, 2007 in connection with compliance under final Internal Revenue Service regulations issued in 2007 under Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code (Section 409A), and to make other non-material changes not technically required under Section 409A. The Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the Employment Agreement) provides that Dr. Lange serves as the
Companys Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Science Officer. The Employment Agreement supersedes Dr. Langes prior executive severance agreement, and was approved by the Board of Directors.
Base Salary, Bonus, and Long-Term Incentive and Equity Compensation Awards
Under the Employment Agreement, the Company has agreed that it shall continue compensating Dr. Lange while he is employed as Chief Executive Officer in the same
manner that it has done during his past and present employment with the Company. While the general approach to Dr. Langes base salary is as described above, the Employment Agreement further provides that Dr. Lange is to
15
receive a minimum annual salary of $700,000 per year, and that the Compensation Committee shall review Dr. Langes base salary in relation to the
Companys peer group and Dr. Langes principal peers, and in relation to his performance; as a result of these evaluations the Compensation Committee may increase Dr. Langes base salary from time to time above the minimum.
The Employment Agreement provides that the Company shall continue compensating Dr. Lange while he is employed as Chief Executive Officer in the same
manner that it has done during his past and present employment with the Company, and that the Compensation Committee shall review and set Dr. Langes annual bonus compensation in relation to the Companys peer group and
Dr. Langes principal peers, and in relation to the Companys and his performance, provided that the target annual bonus set for Dr. Lange during the term of the Employment Agreement shall be no less favorable than the target
annual bonus for Dr. Lange as of the December 2005 effective date of the original Employment Agreement.
Under the Employment Agreement,
Dr. Lange is eligible to be granted long-term incentive and equity compensation awards in the discretion of the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors based upon the Compensation Committees evaluation of his performance and
market and peer compensation. In addition to any such discretionary awards, if any, in connection with the execution of the original Employment Agreement in December 2005, the Company granted Dr. Lange certain RSU awards, which are
described in greater detail in the 2008 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table, below.
Term, Termination,
Severance and Change of Control
The Employment Agreement has an eight (8)-year term from December 2005, provided that either the Company or
Dr. Lange may terminate his employment at any time and for any reason. In the event of such a termination by the Company without Cause or a resignation by Dr. Lange for Good Reason (as these terms are defined in the Employment Agreement),
or if Dr. Langes employment with the Company ceases due to his death or disability, the Company is required to make severance payments to Dr. Lange (or his beneficiaries) of two (2) times his base salary and of the amount equal
to two (2) times his Average Annual Bonus (as defined in the Employment Agreement, which as provided therein is calculated based on the annual bonuses payable to Dr. Lange under the Companys annual bonus programs for the three
(3) full calendar years prior to the year of termination) as well as a pro rata amount of his target annual bonus for the year of termination, the Company will pay health benefit premiums for Dr. Lange and his eligible dependents for
eighteen (18) months, and Dr. Lange is entitled to certain specified additional equity-related benefits (which relate to full vesting of his outstanding stock options, longer periods of exercisability for his stock options, and specified
additional vesting as to his RSU grants). In the event that any benefits under the Employment Agreement would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, the Company shall make an additional gross-up payment sufficient to
cover all excise taxes on such benefits as well as all taxes on the gross-up payment itself. The Employment Agreement provides that as consideration for the severance payments, as well as any equity grants Dr. Lange may receive from the
Company, Dr. Lange has agreed to be bound by a non-solicitation and non-competition covenant for a period of one (1) year after termination of employment, a non-disparagement covenant for a period of one (1) year after termination of
employment, and a confidentiality covenant.
In addition, if Dr. Langes employment with the Company ceases within eighteen (18) months
after a change of control of the Company (as defined in the Employment Agreement) as a result of a termination of employment by the Company without Cause or a resignation by Dr. Lange for Good Reason, then Dr. Lange receives all of the
benefits described above, except that the Company will continue to pay health benefit premiums for Dr. Lange and his eligible dependents for up to twenty-four (24) months; and in the event of any such specified cessation of employment at
any time after a change of control of the Company, then Dr. Lange receives all of the foregoing benefits and, in addition, all of Dr. Langes unvested stock options, restricted stock and other equity compensation granted to
Dr. Lange shall immediately accelerate vesting as to 100% of the covered shares.
Additional Benefits
During the term of the Employment Agreement Dr. Lange is entitled to receive from the Company a monthly automobile allowance of $1,000, reimbursement of certain
expenses of up to $25,000 annually, and supplemental long-term disability insurance providing no less than $10,000 coverage per month in additional coverage. In addition, the Company agreed to reimburse Dr. Lange up to a specified amount for
reasonable attorneys fees he incurred in connection with the negotiation of the Employment Agreement as amended in 2007. These amounts are described in greater detail in the 2008 Summary Compensation Table, below.
Other Elements of Compensation and Perquisites
In addition to the
foregoing elements of compensation, the Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Companys broad-based Board of Directors-approved Section 401(k) Savings/Retirement Plan and the Companys health and welfare plans on
the same terms as all of the Companys other employees. The Companys 2008 discretionary match contribution amounts to each Named Executive Officer under the Section 401(k) Plan are set forth in the 2008 Summary Compensation
Table, below. In addition, the Company maintains a Board of Directors-approved long-term incentive plan to provide a specific deferred compensation benefit to the Named Executive Officers and a limited group of other senior management. For
each Named Executive Officer, the aggregate plan account balance and aggregate earnings in 2008 (based on deemed investment earnings/losses as provided under the plan) is set forth in the 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table,
below. In addition, Dr. Langes Employment Agreement provides for him
16
to receive certain perquisites, which are described in greater detail in the section entitled Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and
in the 2008 Summary Compensation Table, below, which the Company determined were appropriate to provide in order to minimize distractions from Dr. Langes attention to Company business and allow him to devote additional time to
Company business, as well as to facilitate his use of knowledgeable experts to assist with financial planning and related matters.
Tax Considerations
The Compensation Committee is responsible for addressing the issues raised by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which makes certain
non-performance-based compensation to certain of the Companys executives in excess of $1,000,000 non-deductible by the Company. The Compensation Committee has determined that stock option based compensation for the Companys
Named Executive Officers will generally qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) and be fully deductible for the year in which such stock options are exercised. To qualify as performance-based under
Section 162(m), RSUs and cash compensation payments must be granted or made pursuant to a plan, by a committee of at least two (2) outside directors (as defined in the regulations promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code)
and must be based on achieving objective performance goals. In addition, the material terms of such plan must be disclosed to and approved by stockholders and the outside directors or the Compensation Committee, as applicable, who must certify that
the performance goals were achieved before payments can be awarded.
While the Compensation Committee considers Section 162(m) in making its
compensation decisions, the deductibility of compensation under Section 162(m) is not a definitive or dispositive factor in the Compensation Committees determination process. The Compensation Committee will monitor the level of
compensation paid to the Companys executive officers and may act in response to the provisions of Section 162(m).
2008
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each Named Executive Officer for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)(1)
|
|
Bonus
($)(2)
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)(3)
|
|
Option
Awards
($)(4)(5)
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(6)
|
|
Change in
Pension
Value
and Non-
qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(7)
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)(8)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
770,000
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
2,343,833
|
|
$
|
1,852,531
|
|
$
|
1,540,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
31,485
|
(9)
|
|
$
|
6,537,849
|
|
2007
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,728,374
|
|
|
1,240,437
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
35,044
|
(9)
|
|
|
5,636,855
|
|
2006
|
|
|
624,000
|
|
|
262,500
|
|
|
1,794,084
|
|
|
1,058,297
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
89,171
|
(9)
|
|
|
4,328,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel K. Spiegelman
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
2008
|
|
|
368,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,058
|
|
|
400,802
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
15,497
|
|
|
|
1,433,357
|
|
2007
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
556,687
|
|
|
616,291
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
14,997
|
|
|
|
1,652,975
|
|
2006
|
|
|
312,000
|
|
|
82,500
|
|
|
272,213
|
|
|
447,464
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
1,239,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent K. Blackburn, Ph.D
Senior Vice President, Drug Discovery and Development
|
|
2008
|
|
|
368,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,058
|
|
|
400,802
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
15,497
|
|
|
|
1,418,357
|
|
2007
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
556,687
|
|
|
616,291
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
15,496
|
|
|
|
1,653,474
|
|
2006
|
|
|
312,000
|
|
|
82,500
|
|
|
272,213
|
|
|
447,464
|
|
|
130,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
1,259,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tricia Borga Suvari, Esq.
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
|
2008
|
|
|
348,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,058
|
|
|
400,802
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
15,497
|
|
|
|
1,383,357
|
|
2007
|
|
|
316,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
556,687
|
|
|
602,503
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
15,496
|
|
|
|
1,630,686
|
|
2006
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
272,213
|
|
|
392,208
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
1,124,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lewis J. Stuart(10)
Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations
|
|
2008
|
|
|
314,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
321,037
|
|
|
400,802
|
|
|
190,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
15,497
|
|
|
|
1,241,336
|
|
2007
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
336,416
|
|
|
520,599
|
|
|
128,000
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
15,496
|
|
|
|
1,280,511
|
(1)
|
Includes amounts earned but deferred at the election of the Named Executive Officer, such as salary deferrals under the Companys 401(k) plan.
|
(2)
|
These bonus amounts reflect discretionary cash bonuses paid in February 2006 in connection with the receipt of regulatory approval of the Companys lead product in January
2006.
|
(3)
|
Amounts in the stock awards column represent RSUs that generally vest in forty-eight (48) equal monthly installments beginning on the date of grant. Distribution of vested
shares of common stock occurs on the one (1)-year, two (2)-year, three (3)-year and four (4)-year anniversaries of the grant date. Total amounts disclosed represent stock-based compensation expense for 2008, 2007 and 2006 as calculated under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard 123R,
Share-Based Payment
(FAS 123R). Some of the RSUs provided for immediate acceleration of vesting in the event the Company achieved a certain product revenue target over four (4) consecutive
quarters. During 2007, this revenue target was met and the accelerated expense has been included in the table above. The stock compensation expense related to the accelerated vesting of these RSUs is as follows: $431,250 for Dr. Lange, $179,688
for Mr. Spiegelman, $179,688 for Dr. Blackburn, $179,688 for Ms. Suvari, and $97,031 for Mr. Stuart. The Companys RSUs and all assumptions related to the valuation of RSUs are discussed in Note 14, Stock-Based
Compensation, in the 10-K.
|
(4)
|
Each Named Executive Officer also received a grant of a stock appreciation right (SAR) in January 2005. These SAR grants were modified by the Board of Directors in January 2006, and
are therefore included in the table above. In addition, in May 2007, the Board of Directors approved the cancellation of outstanding SAR awards provided that the individual SAR holder also voluntarily consented to such cancellation, effective
June 1, 2007. Excluded from the cancellation of outstanding SAR awards were any and all grants to Dr. Lange. In accordance with FAS 123R, a cancellation of an award that is not accompanied by a concurrent grant of (or offer to grant) a
replacement award or other valuable consideration shall be accounted for as a repurchase for no consideration. Accordingly, any previously unrecognized compensation cost was recognized at the cancellation date and is therefore included in the table
above. The stock compensation expense related to the cancellation of these SARs is as follows: $152,331 for Mr. Spiegelman, $152,331 for Dr. Blackburn, $152,331 for Ms. Suvari, and $101,554 for Mr. Stuart. Total amounts disclosed
include stock-based compensation expense for 2007 and 2006 as calculated under FAS 123R. As of December 31, 2008, payments totaled approximately $0.1 million. The Companys SAR grants and all assumptions related to the valuation of SARs
are discussed in Note 14, Stock-Based Compensation, in the 10-K.
|
17
(5)
|
The Companys stock-based compensation program includes incentive and non-statutory stock options. Total amounts disclosed include stock-based compensation expense for 2008,
2007 and 2006 as calculated under FAS 123R. In May 2007, the Board of Directors approved the acceleration of vesting of all options with an exercise price of $10.00 or greater granted to our employees prior to May 31, 2007, effective
June 1, 2007 and the accelerated expense has been included in the table above. Excluded from the accelerated vesting were any and all grants to members of our Board of Directors, including Dr. Lange, all retention grants approved by the
Board of Directors in May 2007 and all options granted to new hires on or after May 31, 2007. The stock compensation related to the accelerated vesting of options is as follows: $235,097 for Mr. Spiegelman, $235,097 for Dr. Blackburn,
$225,854 for Ms. Suvari, and $159,293 for Mr. Stuart. In addition, in November 2007, the Board of Directors approved an amended and restated employment agreement for Dr. Lange, effective December 1, 2007, which modified the
post-termination exercise period of Dr. Langes option grants. The stock compensation expense for 2008 and 2007 related to this modification was $40,598 and $122,737, respectively. The Companys option grants and all assumptions
related to the valuation of options are discussed in Note 14, Stock-Based Compensation, in the 10-K.
|
(6)
|
Represents cash bonuses earned in 2008 that were paid in 2009, 2007 that were paid in 2008 and cash bonuses earned in 2006 that were paid in 2007, as discussed in greater detail in
the section entitled Compensation Discussion and Analysis, above.
|
(7)
|
No Named Executive Officers participate in any qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans sponsored by the Company, and the Company does not maintain any qualified or
non-qualified defined benefit plans.
|
(8)
|
Under rules promulgated by the SEC, no perquisite amounts are shown for any Named Executive Officer if the aggregate perquisite amount for any individual Named Executive Officer did
not exceed $10,000 in 2008, 2007 and 2006. For 2008, the Company made a discretionary matching contribution to all eligible participants in the Companys 401(k) plan in the form of cash and shares of common stock. All eligible participants in
the 401(k) plan were allocated this matching contribution on January 7, 2009, with the number of shares being allocated to participants accounts based on the closing price of the common stock on that date (which was $9.23 per share). Each
of Dr. Lange, Mr. Spiegelman, Dr. Blackburn, Ms. Suvari and Mr. Stuart received a matching contribution of 1,679 shares of common stock (with a value on the allocation date of $15,497.17 based on the price per share on such
date) and $2.83 in cash for fractional shares. For 2007, the Company made a discretionary matching contribution to all eligible participants in the Companys 401(k) plan in the form of cash and shares of common stock. All eligible participants
in the 401(k) plan were allocated this matching contribution on January 4, 2008, with the number of shares being allocated to participants accounts based on the closing price of the common stock on that date (which was $8.76 per share).
Each of Dr. Lange, Dr. Blackburn, Ms. Suvari and Mr. Stuart received a matching contribution of 1,769 shares of common stock (with a value on the allocation date of $15,496.44 based on the price per share on such date) and $3.56
in cash for fractional shares. Mr. Spiegelman received a matching contribution of 1,712 shares of common stock (with a value on the allocation date of $14,997.12 based on the price per share on such date) and $2.88 in cash for fractional
shares. For 2006, the Company made a discretionary matching contribution to all eligible participants in the Companys 401(k) plan in the form of cash and shares of common stock. All eligible participants in the 401(k) plan were allocated this
matching contribution on January 8, 2007, with the number of shares being allocated to participants accounts based on the closing price of the common stock on that date (which was $13.10 per share). Each of Dr. Lange,
Mr. Spiegelman, Dr. Blackburn, and Ms. Suvari received a matching contribution of 1,145 shares of common stock (with a value on the allocation date of $14,999.50 based on the price per share on such date) and $0.50 in cash for
fractional shares.
|
(9)
|
Includes $15,988 of perquisites for Dr. Lange for 2008, $19,548 of perquisites for Dr. Lange for 2007 and $74,171 of perquisites for Dr. Lange for 2006. Under
Dr. Langes amended and restated Employment Agreement with the Company, in 2008, Dr. Lange received reimbursement of $12,000 for the use of an automobile, and $3,988 for financial support and assistance expenses. Under
Dr. Langes amended and restated Employment Agreement with the Company, in 2007, Dr. Lange received reimbursement of $12,000 for the use of an automobile, $3,258 for financial support and assistance expenses and $4,290 for
attorneys fees incurred by him in connection with the negotiation of his amended and restated Employment Agreement. In 2006, Dr. Lange received reimbursement of $12,322 for the use of an automobile, $8,516 for financial and legal support
and assistance expenses, and $30,000 for attorneys fees incurred by him in connection with the negotiation of his original Employment Agreement with the Company. In addition, the $30,000 reimbursement of legal fees was grossed-up by $23,333 to
pay taxes.
|
(10)
|
Mr. Stuart was promoted to Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations, effective as of July 16, 2007. Prior to this date, Mr. Stuart was the Companys Vice
President, Sales.
|
2008 Grants Of Plan-Based Awards Table
There were no grants awarded in the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company does not have any estimated future payouts under any equity or non-equity incentive
plan awards.
2008 Outstanding Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End Table
The following table provides information on the stock options, RSUs and stock appreciation rights held by each Named Executive Officer as of December 31, 2008. The Company does not have any unearned equity
incentive awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Date of
Grant
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested (#)
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have
Not
Vested ($)(3)
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)(1)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
5/16/2000
|
|
100,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37.13
|
|
|
5/16/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/16/2001
|
|
100,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.25
|
|
|
1/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/31/2001
|
|
50,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.61
|
|
|
10/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/10/2001
|
|
100,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.34
|
|
|
12/10/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/7/2002
|
|
50,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.03
|
|
|
6/7/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/2/2002
|
|
125,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.21
|
|
|
12/2/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2003
|
|
175,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.16
|
|
|
12/11/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2005
|
|
27,000
|
(5)
|
|
9,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
24.94
|
|
|
12/5/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2006
|
|
18,000
|
(5)
|
|
18,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
13.33
|
|
|
12/11/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/22/2007
|
|
333,333
|
(6)
|
|
416,667
|
(6)
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
|
8/22/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
110,520
|
|
|
12/22/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,207
|
(8)
|
|
|
370,306
|
|
|
1/3/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,174
|
(9)
|
|
|
47,653
|
|
|
12/11/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
221,040
|
|
|
8/22/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,667
|
(10)
|
|
|
1,765,253
|
|
|
1/3/2005
|
|
|
|
|
43,750
|
(11)
|
|
|
N/A
|
(12)
|
|
1/3/2009
|
(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel K. Spiegelman
|
|
5/16/2000
|
|
50,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.13
|
|
|
5/16/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/16/2001
|
|
50,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.25
|
|
|
1/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Date of
Grant
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested (#)
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)(3)
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)(1)
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/31/2001
|
|
25,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
40.61
|
|
10/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/10/2001
|
|
25,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
57.34
|
|
12/10/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/7/2002
|
|
25,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
17.03
|
|
6/7/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/2/2002
|
|
50,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
23.21
|
|
12/2/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2003
|
|
75,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
13.16
|
|
12/11/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2005
|
|
15,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
24.94
|
|
12/5/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2006
|
|
15,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
13.33
|
|
12/11/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/22/2007
|
|
83,333
|
(6)
|
|
104,167
|
(6)
|
|
10.45
|
|
8/22/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(7)
|
|
46,050
|
|
|
12/11/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(7)
|
|
92,100
|
|
|
8/22/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,917
|
(10)
|
|
441,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent K. Blackburn, Ph.D.
|
|
5/16/2000
|
|
35,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
37.13
|
|
5/16/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/16/2001
|
|
50,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
44.25
|
|
1/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/31/2001
|
|
25,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
40.61
|
|
10/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/10/2001
|
|
35,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
57.34
|
|
12/10/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/7/2002
|
|
25,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
17.03
|
|
6/7/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/2/2002
|
|
50,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
23.21
|
|
12/2/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2003
|
|
75,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
13.16
|
|
12/11/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2005
|
|
15,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
24.94
|
|
12/5/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2006
|
|
15,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
13.33
|
|
12/11/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/22/2007
|
|
83,333
|
(6)
|
|
104,167
|
(6)
|
|
10.45
|
|
8/22/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(7)
|
|
46,050
|
|
|
12/11/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(7)
|
|
92,100
|
|
|
8/22/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,917
|
(10)
|
|
441,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tricia Borga Suvari, Esq.
|
|
5/15/2000
|
|
75,000
|
(13)
|
|
|
|
|
34.13
|
|
5/15/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/16/2001
|
|
10,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
44.25
|
|
1/16/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/31/2001
|
|
25,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
40.61
|
|
10/31/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/10/2001
|
|
25,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
57.34
|
|
12/10/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/7/2002
|
|
20,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
17.03
|
|
6/7/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/2/2002
|
|
30,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
23.21
|
|
12/2/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2003
|
|
50,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
13.16
|
|
12/11/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2005
|
|
15,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
24.94
|
|
12/5/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2006
|
|
15,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
13.33
|
|
12/11/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/22/2007
|
|
83,333
|
(6)
|
|
104,167
|
(6)
|
|
10.45
|
|
8/22/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(7)
|
|
46,050
|
|
|
12/11/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(7)
|
|
92,100
|
|
|
8/22/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,917
|
(10)
|
|
441,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lewis J. Stuart
|
|
6/23/2003
|
|
115,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
30.00
|
|
6/23/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2003
|
|
10,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
13.38
|
|
12/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2005
|
|
8,100
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
24.94
|
|
12/5/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2006
|
|
8,100
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
13.33
|
|
12/11/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/22/2007
|
|
83,333
|
(6)
|
|
104,167
|
(6)
|
|
10.45
|
|
8/22/2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
(7)
|
|
24,867
|
|
|
12/11/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
(7)
|
|
49,734
|
|
|
8/22/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,917
|
(10)
|
|
441,316
|
(1)
|
Options are granted at an exercise price equal to the closing market price per share on the last trading day prior to the date of grant, in accordance with the definition of fair
market value in the Companys equity incentive plans. There is no exercise price for RSUs or SARs.
|
(2)
|
Options expire ten (10) years from the date of grant.
|
(3)
|
Amounts shown are based on the fair market value of the Companys common stock at December 31, 2008, the last trading day of 2008, which was $9.21 per share.
|
(4)
|
Each of the options vests as follows: twenty percent (20%) of the shares subject to the option vest on the first anniversary of the grant date; the remaining shares vest at the
rate of 1.667% of the shares subject to the option per month for the next twenty-four (24) months and at the rate of 3.333% of the shares subject to the option for the next twelve (12) months.
|
(5)
|
Each of the options vests in forty-eight (48) equal installments beginning on the date of the grant.
|
(6)
|
Each of the options vest in thirty-six (36) equal installments beginning on the date of grant
|
(7)
|
Each RSU vests in forty-eight (48) equal monthly installments beginning on the date of grant. Distribution of vested shares of common stock will occur on the one (1)-year, two
(2)-year, three (3)-year and four (4)-year anniversaries of the grant date. There is no exercise price for these RSU grants. Upon payout, the Named Executive Officer is entitled to receive one (1) share of common stock for each one
(1) RSU.
|
(8)
|
In accordance with Dr. Langes Employment Agreement, 20,169 shares of this RSU grant vested effective
December 22, 2005; the remaining RSUs vest quarterly over four (4) years starting on the date of grant. Distribution of vested shares of common stock will occur on the one (1)-year anniversary of each quarterly vesting date, such that 100%
of the shares of common stock subject to the RSU are vested on the fourth (4
th
) anniversary of the effective date.
|
(9)
|
In accordance with Dr. Langes Employment Agreement, 6.25% of the shares of this RSU grant vest at the end of
each three (3)-month period beginning on the date of grant (rounding up to the nearest whole share). Distribution of vested shares of common stock will occur on the one (1)-year anniversary of each quarterly vesting date, such that 100% of the
shares of common stock subject to the RSU are vested on the fourth (4
th
) anniversary of the effective date.
|
(10)
|
Each RSU vest over three years beginning on the date of grant as follows: 7.5% vest after six (6) months on February 22, 2008, 7.5% vest monthly for next six
(6) months (to August 22, 2008), 25% vest monthly for next 12 months (to August 22, 2009) and 60% vest monthly for next 12 months (to August 22, 2010). Distribution of vested shares of common stock will occur on February 22,
2008, February 22, 2009, February 22, 2010 and August 22, 2010.
|
19
(11)
|
Represents the number of SARs for Dr. Lange unvested as of December 31, 2008, not the number of shares of
common stock underlying the SAR award. The SAR award vests annually over four (4) years and SARs are automatically exercised upon each vesting date. When the SAR award vests, Dr. Lange will receive compensation equal to the amount, if any,
by which the volume weighted average market price of the shares covered by the SAR exceeds the SAR base value for each SAR vested. The SAR base value is a predetermined strike price of $26.45, which represented a 15% premium to the market price on
the original grant date. The Company currently expects to settle all amounts due under the SARs, if any, using shares of its common stock. The last quarter of the SARs expire on the fourth (4
th
) year anniversary of the date of grant (January 3, 2009). In May 2007, the Board of Directors approved the cancellation of outstanding SAR awards provided that the individual SAR holder also
voluntarily consented to such cancellation, effective June 1, 2007. Excluded from the cancellation of outstanding SAR awards were any and all grants to Dr. Lange. All other Named Executive Officers voluntarily consented to the cancellation
of their respective SAR award. Through December 31, 2008, payments to date for all SARs were approximately $0.1 million.
|
(12)
|
The SAR holder is not required to pay an exercise price upon exercise of the SAR. Instead, when the SAR vests, the SAR recipient will receive compensation, if any, calculated with
reference to the SARs base value, which is a predetermined price of $26.45, representing a 15% premium to the market price on the grant date. In May 2007, the Board of Directors approved the cancellation of outstanding SAR awards provided that
the individual SAR holder also voluntarily consented to such cancellation, effective June 1, 2007. Excluded from the cancellation of outstanding SAR awards were any and all grants to Dr. Lange. All other Named Executive Officers
voluntarily consented to the cancellation of their respective SAR award. Through December 31, 2008, payments for all SARs were approximately $0.1 million.
|
(13)
|
24% of the shares subject to the option vest on the one (1)-year anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining shares subject to the option vest at the rate of 2% per
month thereafter.
|
2008 Option Exercises And Stock Vested Table
The following table provides information on each exercise, distribution or settlement of stock options, RSUs or stock appreciation rights, and each vesting of stock,
including RSUs and stock appreciation rights, for each Named Executive Officer for the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
|
Number of Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
|
|
|
Value Realized
on Exercise
($)(1)
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Distribution
(#)
|
|
|
Value
Realized on
Distribution
($)(2)
|
Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D
|
|
837
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
7,474
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
114,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
101,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,052
|
(7)
|
|
|
73,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,052
|
(7)
|
|
|
84,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,052
|
(7)
|
|
|
112,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,052
|
(7)
|
|
|
89,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,293
|
(8)
|
|
|
9,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
(8)
|
|
|
10,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,293
|
(8)
|
|
|
14,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
(8)
|
|
|
11,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,750
|
(9)
|
|
|
130,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel K. Spiegelman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
47,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
42,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,688
|
(9)
|
|
|
32,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent K. Blackburn, Ph.D
|
|
10,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
1,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
(5)
|
|
|
41,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
(5)
|
|
|
44,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
47,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
42,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,688
|
(9)
|
|
|
32,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tricia Borga Suvari, Esq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
47,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
42,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,688
|
(9)
|
|
|
32,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lewis J. Stuart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
(6)
|
|
|
25,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
(6)
|
|
|
22,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,688
|
(9)
|
|
|
32,582
|
20
(1)
|
Value realized is based on the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of exercise (or the actual sales price if the shares were sold by the optionee
simultaneously with the exercise) minus the exercise price, without taking into account any taxes that may be payable in connection with the transaction.
|
(2)
|
Value realized is based on the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of distribution without taking into account any taxes that may be payable in
connection with the transaction.
|
(3)
|
Consists of the gross number of shares of common stock that were earned in 2008 underlying the vested SAR award, without taking into account any taxes that may be payable in
connection with the transaction.
|
(4)
|
For purposes of the SAR payout on the third (3rd) anniversary of the grant date, the payment amount on the January 2008 settlement date equaled the excess of the Companys
stock price on the settlement date over the $26.45 base exercise price for 2007 as well as any compensation received in 2006. The Companys stock price was calculated based on the volume-weighted average price over the preceding one (1)-year
measurement period prior to the automatic exercise date. In May 2007, the Board of Directors approved the cancellation of outstanding SAR awards provided that the individual SAR holder also voluntarily consented to such cancellation, effective
June 1, 2007. Excluded from the cancellation of outstanding SAR awards were any and all grants to Dr. Lange. All other Named Executive Officers voluntarily consented to the cancellation of their respective SAR award.
|
(5)
|
Represents options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
(6)
|
Represents distribution of vested shares of common stock under the RSUs which vest in forty-eight (48) equal monthly installments beginning on the date of grant. Distribution
of vested shares of common stock will occur on the one (1)-year, two (2)-year, three (3)-year and four (4)-year anniversaries of the grant date. There is no exercise price for these RSU grants. Upon payout, the Named Executive Officer is entitled to
receive one (1) share of common stock for each one (1) RSU.
|
(7)
|
In accordance with Dr. Langes Employment Agreement, 20,169 shares of this RSU grant vested effective December 22, 2005; the remaining RSUs vest quarterly over four
(4) years starting on the date of grant. Distribution of vested shares of common stock will occur on the one (1)-year anniversary of each quarterly vesting date, such that 100% of the shares of common stock subject to the RSU are vested on the
fourth (4th) anniversary of the effective date.
|
(8)
|
In accordance with Dr. Langes Employment Agreement, 6.25% of the shares of this RSU grant vest at the end of each three (3)-month period beginning on the date of grant
(rounding up to the nearest whole share). Distribution of vested shares of common stock will occur on the one (1)-year anniversary of each quarterly vesting date, such that 100% of the shares of common stock subject to the RSU are vested on the
fourth (4th) anniversary of the effective date.
|
(9)
|
Represents distribution of vested shares of common stock under the RSUs which vest over three (3) years beginning on the date of grant as follows: 7.5% vest after six
(6) months on February 22, 2008, 7.5% vest monthly for next six (6) months (to August 22, 2008), 25% vest monthly for next 12 months (to August 22, 2009) and 60% vest monthly for next 12 months (to August 22, 2010).
Distribution of vested shares of common stock occurs on February 22, 2008, February 22, 2009, February 22, 2010 and August 22, 2010. There is no exercise price for these RSU grants. Upon payout, the Named Executive Officer is
entitled to receive one (1) share of common stock for each one (1) RSU.
|
Pension Benefits
No Named Executive Officer participates in or has an account balance under qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans sponsored by the Company, and the Company does
not presently sponsor any such defined benefit plans.
2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
The following table provides information with respect to each defined contribution or other plan that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not
tax-qualified for each Named Executive Officer for the year ended December 31, 2008. The only relevant plan is the Companys Long-Term Incentive Plan, which is described in greater detail below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Executive
Contributions
in 2008 ($)(1)
|
|
Registrant
Contributions
in 2008 ($)(1)
|
|
Aggregate
Earnings
(gain/
(loss))
in 2008
($)(1)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Distributions
($)
|
|
Aggregate
Balance at
December 31,
2008 ($)(1)
|
Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
(116,081
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
188,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel K. Spiegelman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
|
|
129,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent K. Blackburn, Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tricia Borga Suvari, Esq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,302
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lewis J. Stuart(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
(1)
|
To date, the only contribution to the Long-Term Incentive Plan has been a Company contribution in 2003, of which 10% vested in January 2004, 20% vested in January 2005 and 70%
vested in January 2006, in accordance with the vesting schedule described below. Under the terms of the plan, base salary and bonus deferrals are not permitted as of the effective date; however, the Board of Directors may, at any time or from time
to time amend the plan to permit such deferrals. With respect to any Company contribution under the plan, each Named Executive Officers individual amount (as well as any other participants individual amount) is subject to vesting based
on continued service to the Company, in accordance with the following schedule set forth in the plan: 10% vests on the one (1)-year anniversary of the date the Company contribution is credited; 20% vests on the two (2)-year anniversary of the date
the Company contribution is credited; and 70% vests on the three (3)-year anniversary of the date the Company contribution is credited. Solely for recordkeeping purposes, the plan administrator established a contribution account for each
participant, which is credited with the contributions made by such participant or on her or his behalf by the Company. The contribution account is further credited or charged with the hypothetical or deemed investment earnings and losses based on
hypothetical investment elections made by the participant with respect to his or her contribution account, on a form designated by the plan administrator, from among the investment funds selected by the plan administrator. All Company contributions
are distributable only upon certain specified future events, such as the participants retirement, disability, death, or termination of employment with the Company, the participants election of an in-service distribution or a change of
control of the Company, pursuant to the terms of the plan. The investment funds upon which the hypothetical or deemed investment earnings and losses were based in 2008, and the funds annual rates of return for 2008, are as follows: Fidelity
Advisor Diversified International Fund, -41.89%; Janus Adviser Balanced Fund, -14.82%; PIMCO Total Return Fund, 4.33%; T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Stock Fund, -33.50%; Wells Fargo Advantage Index Fund, -37.39%; and Wells Fargo Advantage Cash
Investment Money Market Fund, 2.51%.
|
(2)
|
Mr. Stuart is not a participant in the Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
22
2008 Potential Payments Upon Termination Or Change Of Control Table
The following table provides potential payments that may be made to each Named Executive Officer upon termination or a change of control as defined and pursuant to
individual agreements. The amounts shown in the table below assume that the executive was terminated on December 31, 2008 and that the effective date of the change of control was December 31, 2008, and do not include amounts (if any) in
which the Named Executive Officer had already vested as of December 31, 2008. The amounts shown below are hypothetical payments calculated using the assumptions required under applicable regulations, and do not represent actual payments to any
Named Executive Officer. The actual compensation to be paid can only be determined at the time of a Named Executive Officers termination of employment or upon a change of control, as applicable. In the table below, N/A indicates
that there is no applicable payment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Before Change
of Control:
Termination
w/o Cause or
for Good
Reason
|
|
|
After Change
of Control:
Termination
w/o Cause or
for Good
Reason
|
|
|
Voluntary
Termination
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D(1)
|
|
Severance payments
|
|
$
|
1,540,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,540,000
|
(2)
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
1,540,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,540,000
|
|
|
|
Bonus payments
|
|
|
2,663,333
|
(3)
|
|
|
2,663,333
|
(2)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
2,663,333
|
(4)
|
|
|
2,663,333
|
(5)
|
|
|
Health benefits
|
|
|
28,058
|
(6)
|
|
|
38,014
|
(2)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
28,058
|
(5)
|
|
|
Equity acceleration
|
|
|
1,483,251
|
(7)
|
|
|
2,522,481
|
(8)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
1,483,251
|
(4)
|
|
|
1,483,251
|
(5)
|
|
|
Gross up payment for excise tax
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel K. Spiegelman
|
|
Severance payments
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
552,000
|
(10)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Bonus payments
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
(11)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Health benefits
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
28,058
|
(12)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Equity acceleration
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
579,466
|
(8)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Gross up payment for excise tax
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent K. Blackburn, Ph.D
|
|
Severance payments
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
552,000
|
(10)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Bonus payments
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
337,500
|
(11)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Health benefits
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
28,058
|
(12)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Equity acceleration
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
579,466
|
(8)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Gross up payment for excise tax
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tricia Borga Suvari, Esq.
|
|
Severance payments
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
522,000
|
(10)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Bonus payments
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
315,000
|
(11)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Health benefits
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
18,007
|
(12)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Equity acceleration
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
579,466
|
(8)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Gross up payment for excise tax
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lewis J. Stuart
|
|
Severance payments
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
471,000
|
(10)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Bonus payments
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
315,000
|
(11)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Health benefits
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
27,886
|
(12)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Equity acceleration
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
515,917
|
(12)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Gross up payment for excise tax
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
(1)
|
Dr. Langes minimum base salary pursuant to his amended and restated Employment Agreement with the Company, effective as of December 1, 2007, was $770,000 per year
effective January 1, 2008, and may be increased by the Compensation Committee from time to time as described in the section entitled Certain Relationships and Related TransactionsCEO Employment Agreement, below. The Employment
Agreement has an eight (8)-year term from the original December 2005 effective date, provided that either the Company or Dr. Lange may terminate his employment at any time and for any reason. In the event of such a termination by the Company
without cause or by Dr. Lange for good reason, or if Dr. Langes employment with the Company ceases due to his death or disability, the Company is required to make a severance payment to Dr. Lange (or his beneficiaries) in the
amount of 200% of his base salary, in a lump sum. The Employment Agreement provides that as consideration for the severance payments, Dr. Lange agrees to be bound by a non-solicitation covenant for a period of one (1) year after
termination of employment, a non-disparagement covenant for a period of one (1) year after termination of employment, and a confidentiality covenant.
|
(2)
|
Includes all payments defined in the column entitled Before Change of Control: Termination without Cause or for Good Reason plus the extension of health benefit premiums
paid by the Company for Dr. Lange and his family from 18 months to 24 months following a change of control of the Company. The contracts for medical, dental and vision are from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009. The costs reflected
in the table above include the full premium plus a 2% administrative fee for COBRA.
|
(3)
|
In the event of such a termination by the Company without cause or by Dr. Lange for good reason (including a termination by reason of Dr. Langes death or
disability), under the Employment Agreement the Company is required to make a severance payment, in a lump sum, to Dr. Lange in the amount of 200% of his average annual bonus (with such average annual bonus to be calculated based on the annual
bonuses received by Dr. Lange in the three (3) full calendar years prior to the year in which such termination occurs), and a pro rata amount of his target annual bonus for the year in which such termination occurs. In 2008,
Dr. Langes annual bonus was 200% of his base salary.
|
(4)
|
The amounts shown in the column entitled Death include all payments in the column entitled Before Change of Control: Termination Without Cause or for Good
Reason except health benefits.
|
(5)
|
The amounts shown in the column entitled Disability include all payments in the column entitled Before Change of Control: Termination Without Cause or for Good
Reason.
|
23
(6)
|
Under the Employment Agreement with Dr. Lange, the Company will continue to pay health benefit premiums for Dr. Lange and his family for 18 months (or, if such termination
occurs within 18 months following a change of control, 24 months) following such termination. The contracts for medical, dental and vision are from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009. The costs reflected in the table above include the
full premium plus a 2% administrative fee for COBRA.
|
(7)
|
In connection with a termination of Dr. Langes employment with the Company without cause or for good reason, all of his outstanding options to purchase common stock will
vest in full, his RSU grants will continue to vest for an additional twelve (12) months and the time during which Dr. Lange may exercise his options will be extended. The value realized upon acceleration is calculated based on the
intrinsic value of the option or RSU as of December 31, 2008.
|
(8)
|
In the event of a change of control of the Company, under the 2000 Incentive Plan, each outstanding stock award shall, automatically and without further action by the Company,
become fully vested and/or exercisable with respect to all of the shares of common stock subject thereto, and all shares of common stock subject to outstanding RSUs shall be distributed to holders thereof, no later than five (5) business days
before the closing of such change of control. In addition, to the extent permitted by law, any surviving corporation or acquiring corporation in a change of control may assume any such stock awards outstanding under the 2000 Incentive Plan or
substitute similar stock awards (including awards to acquire the same consideration paid to the stockholders in the change of control) for those outstanding under the 2000 Incentive Plan. In the event any surviving corporation or acquiring
corporation does not assume such stock awards or substitute similar stock awards for those outstanding under the 2000 Incentive Plan, then the stock awards shall terminate if not exercised at or prior to the closing of the change of control. The
value realized upon acceleration is calculated based on the intrinsic value of the option or RSU as of December 31, 2008.
|
(9)
|
The Company is obligated to make a gross-up payment to Dr. Lange in the event that there is a change in control and the severance payment is subject to excise taxes. Based on
the calculations above, no severance payment is subject to excise tax.
|
(10)
|
In the event of termination of employment by the Company without cause or for good reason (including a termination by reason of death or disability), the Company is required to make
a severance payment to the Named Executive Officer (or his or her beneficiaries) in the amount of 18 months worth of base salary, in a lump sum. Such benefits will terminate immediately if the Named Executive Officer, at any time, violates any
proprietary information or confidentiality obligation of the Company. For purposes of the amounts shown above, the calculation is based on the base salary amount for 2008 for each Named Executive Officer.
|
(11)
|
In the event of such a termination of employment by the Company without cause or for good reason (including a termination by reason of death or disability), the Company is required
to make a severance payment, in a lump sum, in the amount of 150% of the bonus paid in the year immediately preceding the effective date of the change of control of the Company. For purposes of the amounts shown above, the calculation is based on
the annual discretionary cash bonus amount for 2008 (paid in 2009) for each Named Executive Officer.
|
(12)
|
The Company will continue to pay health benefit premiums for the Named Executive Officer and his or her family for 18 months (following a change of control) following such
termination. The contracts for medical, dental and vision are from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009. The costs reflected in the table above include the full premium plus a 2% administrative fee for COBRA.
|
(13)
|
The Company is obligated to make a gross-up payment to the Named Executive Officer in the event that the severance payment is subject to excise taxes. Based on the calculations
above, no severance payment is subject to excise tax.
|
Director Compensation
Cash Compensation
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the
Companys non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $30,000 and a payment of $5,000 per meeting for each of the regularly scheduled meetings of the Board of Directors attended (or $1,000 if attendance is by telephone). Effective
May 20, 2008, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Lee as the lead non-employee director. As part of this appointment, Mr. Lees annual retainer increased from $30,000 to $45,000 effective as of May 20, 2008 (prorated for
2008). Members of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Governance Committees each receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000 for each committee on which the member serves, except that the chair of each of the Audit, Compensation and
Nominating and Governance Committees receives an additional annual retainer of $25,000, $20,000 and $15,000, respectively. Directors are also reimbursed for reasonable expenses in connection with attendance at Board of Directors and committee
meetings. For each Board of Directors member, the aggregate total annual retainer owed to such Board of Directors member is paid in quarterly installments each year. Dr. Lange is not separately compensated for his services as a director.
Equity Compensation
Historically, each of the
Companys non-employee directors received stock option grants to purchase shares of common stock under the Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan or Directors Plan which was terminated with Board of Directors and stockholder
approval in 2005. No options were granted under the Directors Plan during the year ended December 31, 2008.
In 2005, the Company instituted its
Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Policy (the Director Equity Policy), under which the Companys non-employee directors automatically receive grants of stock awards under the 2000 Incentive Plan. However, options outstanding at the time
of such termination remained outstanding under the Directors Plan.
Under the Director Equity Policy, all non-employee directors of the Company
receive option grants on the same terms and conditions as those previously set forth in the Directors Plan. Specifically, commencing after the Companys 2005 Annual Meeting held on May 26, 2005, and with respect to each annual
meeting of stockholders at which directors are elected thereafter, each non-employee director initially elected to be a non-employee director by the Board of Directors or stockholders will, upon such initial election, automatically be awarded an
option to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the fair market value on the date of grant (the Initial Option). Additionally, commencing with the grants on the date of the
Companys 2008 annual meeting held on May 20, 2008, each annual meeting of stockholders at which directors are elected thereafter, each existing non-employee director will automatically be awarded an option to purchase 15,000 shares of
common stock (the Annual Replenishment Option) with an exercise price equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the fair market value on the date of grant. Grants of stock awards to the Companys non-employee directors are made under the 2000
Incentive Plan. Effective May 20, 2008, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Lee as the lead non-employee director. As part of this appointment, Mr. Lees annual replenishment option will increase from 15,000 shares to 22,500
shares, granted May 20, 2008 (with all other terms the same as for other non-employee directors).
24
Each Initial Option and Annual Replenishment Option is a
nonstatutory stock option subject to the terms and conditions of the 2000 Incentive Plan. Each Initial Option vests at the rate of 1/36
th
per month over thirty six (36) months from the date of grant of the Initial Option, and each Annual Replenishment Option vests
at the rate of 1/12
th
per month over
twelve (12) months from the date of grant. Furthermore, Initial Options and Annual Replenishment Options vest only during the optionholders Continuous Service (as defined in the 2000 Incentive Plan); provided, however, that the
Compensation Committee has the power to accelerate the time during which an option granted under the Director Equity Policy may vest or be exercised.
Initial Options and Annual Replenishment Options terminate upon the earlier of (i) ten (10) years after the date of grant or (ii) six (6) months after the date of termination of the optionholders Continuous Service
(or such longer or shorter period as the Compensation Committee may specify), or, if the termination of Continuous Service is due to the optionholders death, eighteen (18) months after the date of the optionholders death by the
person or persons to whom the rights to such option pass by will or by the laws of descent and distribution (or such longer or shorter period as the Compensation Committee may specify).
During the year ended December 31, 2008, Annual Replenishment options to acquire 15,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $8.74 per share equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the fair market
value (as defined in the 2000 Incentive Plan) on the date of grant were granted to each non-employee member of the Board of Directors under the 2000 Incentive Plan, in accordance with the Director Equity Policy. Mr. Lee was appointed as the
lead non-employee director of the Company on May 20, 2008 and in connection with his appointment as a lead non-employee director, Mr. Lee received an option grant of 22,500 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $8.74 per share,
equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the fair market value (as defined in the 2000 Incentive Plan) on the date of grant.
2008
Director Compensation Table
The following table provides information concerning the compensation of the Companys non-employee directors for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)(1)
|
|
Option
Awards
($)(2)
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
Santos J. Costa
|
|
$
|
83,181
|
|
$
|
69,015
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
152,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph M. Davie, M.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
67,000
|
|
|
194,613
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
261,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas L. Gutshall
|
|
|
76,272
|
|
|
69,015
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
145,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Barton Hutt, Esq.(4)(5)
|
|
|
24,275
|
|
|
17,971
|
|
$
|
227,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
269,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth B. Lee Jr.
|
|
|
108,412
|
|
|
93,605
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
202,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barbara J. McNeil, M.D., Ph.D.(4)(6)
|
|
|
29,003
|
|
|
17,971
|
|
|
227,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
273,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas E. Shenk, Ph.D.
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
69,015
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
134,015
|
(1)
|
See the section entitled Director Compensation Cash Compensation, above, for a description of the cash compensation program for the Companys non-employee
directors during the year ended December 31, 2008. Amounts earned in one year and paid in the following year are, for purposes on this table only, accounted for in the year earned.
|
(2)
|
Total amounts disclosed represent stock-based compensation expense for 2008 as calculated under FAS 123R. See Note 14Stock-Based Compensation in the Notes to
the financial statements in the 10-K for a description of how FAS 123R compensation expense is calculated. See the section entitled Director CompensationEquity Compensation, above, for a description of the Companys Director
Equity Policy and the specific terms of the stock options granted to the Companys non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2008. The grant date fair value of option awards granted in 2008 is as follows: $79,781 for
Mr. Costa, $79,781 for Dr. Davie, $79,781 for Mr. Gutshall, $119,671 for Mr. Lee, and $79,781 for Dr. Shenk. The aggregate number of stock option awards outstanding as of December 31, 2008 is as follows: 85,000 shares
for Mr. Costa, 55,000 shares for Dr. Davie, 75,000 for Mr. Gutshall, 92,500 for Mr. Hutt, 92,500 for Mr. Lee, 71,250 for Dr. McNeil and 62,500 for Dr. Shenk. There were no options that were repriced or otherwise
materially modified during 2008. There were no option forfeitures.
|
(3)
|
None of the Companys non-employee directors received any perquisites during 2008.
|
(4)
|
Mr. Hutt and Dr. McNeil resigned from the Board of Directors, effective May 18, 2008. Amounts disclosed on this table represent compensation earned
while Mr. Hutt and Dr. McNeil served as Directors of the Company except for certain amounts that have been included in the All Other Compensation column in the table above. See Note 5 and Note 6 of this table for
|
25
|
further information. On May 19, 2008, Mr. Hutt and Dr. McNeil each entered into a consulting agreement with the Company, providing advisory
services to the Board of Directors. The consulting agreements provides for the following: Mr. Hutt and Dr. McNeil will each receive $75,000 over the term of the agreement which will be one year. $5,000 will be paid upon the effective date
of the agreement (May 19, 2008) and the remainder to be paid in increments of $17,500 in 4 quarterly installments (May 19, August 19, November 19, February 19 over the remainder of the term). In addition, Mr. Hutt and
Dr. McNeil will receive an option grant for 15,000 shares with a grant date on May 20, 2008, exercisable until May 20, 2010. These option grants will vest quarterly over a 1 year period. As part of their consulting agreements,
Mr. Hutt and Dr. McNeils options granted at the 2007 stockholders meeting will vest based on their present vesting schedules and shall remain exercisable until May 20, 2010. Any existing option that is fully vested shall
remain exercisable until the earlier of (i) May 20, 2010 or (ii) the original expiration date of the full 10 year term of such option. Under the Director Equity Policy approved by the Board of Directors in 2005, options terminate upon
the earlier of 10 years after date of grant or 6 months after the date of termination of the option holders continuous service. For Mr. Hutt and Dr. McNeil, their options would normally terminate upon the earlier of 10 years from
date of grant or November 20, 2009, six (6) months after their consulting agreements expire. However based on the terms of the consulting agreement, Mr. Hutt and Dr. McNeil remain exercisable until May 20, 2010, thus giving
them an additional 6 months of extended exercisability.
|
(5)
|
Consists of amounts earned when Mr. Hutt was a consultant to the Company. Amounts earned while Mr. Hutt became a consultant are as follows: consulting fees of $75,000 and
stock compensation expense of $152,000 related to vesting of stock options.
|
(6)
|
Consists of amounts earned when Dr. McNeil was a consultant to the Company. Amounts earned while Dr. McNeil became a consultant are as follows: consulting fees of $75,000
and stock compensation expense of $152,000 related to vesting of stock options.
|
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT*
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this
Amendment with management. Based on the Compensation Committees review of and the discussions with management with respect to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of
Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Amendment for filing with the SEC.
From the 2008 members of the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:
Santo J. Costa (Chair)
Joseph M. Davie, M.D., Ph.D.
Kenneth B. Lee, Jr.
*
|
The material in this Amendment is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company under the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
During the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, the following individuals served on the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors: Santo J. Costa, Joseph M. Davie, M.D., Ph.D. and Kenneth B. Lee, Jr. There are and were no interlocking relationships between the Board
of Directors or the Compensation Committee and the board of directors or compensation committee of any other company, nor has any such interlocking relationship existed in the past.
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The Company currently has two (2) equity
compensation plans that have been approved by stockholders: the 2000 Incentive Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Company historically has had two (2) equity compensation plans that have not been approved by stockholders: the 2000
Nonstatutory Incentive Plan and the 2004 Employment Commencement Incentive Plan. The 2000 Nonstatutory Incentive Plan was adopted before the current rules requiring stockholder approval of all equity plans went into effect, and was terminated in May
2004 as to any further grants thereunder. The 2004 Employment Commencement Incentive Plan was approved by the Board in December 2004 to provide for the grant of stock awards which are intended to be stand-alone inducement awards as permitted
pursuant to Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 4350(i)(1)(A)(iv). Only newly hired employees who have not previously been an employee or director of the Company or an affiliate, or following a bona fide period of non-employment with the Company or an
affiliate, are eligible to participate in the 2004 Employment Commencement Incentive Plan.
26
The following table sets forth the number and weighted-average exercise price of securities to be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options and RSUs and the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under all of the Companys equity compensation plans, at February 23, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Weighted-average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options, Warrants
and Rights ($)(1)
|
|
Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future
Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation
Plans
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders (2)
|
|
7,009,735
|
|
|
$
|
19.58
|
|
2,046,198
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders
|
|
3,171,831
|
|
|
|
21.61
|
|
51,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
10,181,566
|
(4)
|
|
|
20.32
|
|
2,097,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents the weighted average exercise price for options only. There is no exercise price for the RSU grants.
|
(2)
|
Information for the Employee Stock Purchase Plan approved by stockholders is included only in the column entitled Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance
Under Equity Compensation Plans. As of February 23, 2009, the Company has a total of 203,414 shares available for future issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
(3)
|
Shares issued to settle the SARs come out of these shares available for future issuance under the Incentive Plan approved by stockholders. During 2007, most of the SARs were
voluntarily cancelled. The gross number of shares of common stock earned in 2008 underlying each remaining outstanding vested SAR award, without taking into account any taxes that may be payable, was a total of 1,030 shares. As of January 3,
2009, any remaining outstanding SAR awards have been fully vested and fully settled. The Company has fully settled and issued, net of taxes, a total of 3,950 shares of stock related to the SARs and their settlement as of February 23, 2009.
|
(4)
|
The aggregate total outstanding awards consist of a total of 8,670,316 options, a total 1,397,678, of unvested RSUs, and a total of 113,572 RSUs that are vested but unissued. As of
February 23, 2009, the weighted average remaining term of options outstanding is 5.97 years.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Companys
common stock as of February 18, 2009 by: (i) each stockholder who is known by the Company based on publicly available records to own beneficially more than five percent (5%) of the Companys common stock; (ii) the Named
Executive Officers; (iii) each director; and (iv) all of directors and Named Executive Officers, as a group. The address for each director and Named Executive Officer listed in the table below is c/o the Company, Inc., 3172 Porter Drive,
Palo Alto, California 94304.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
Owned(1)
|
|
Beneficial Owner/Address
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
FMR LLC(2)
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109
|
|
6,301,711
|
|
9.81
|
%
|
|
|
|
Wellington Management Company, LLP(3)
75 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
|
|
4,399,255
|
|
6.85
|
%
|
|
|
|
Ross Financial Corporation(4)
P.O. Box 31363
Grand Cayman KY1-1206
Cayman Islands
|
|
5,047,280
|
|
7.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
Citigroup, Inc.(5)
399 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10043
|
|
3,928,618
|
|
6.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
Barclays Global Investors, NA & Barclays Global Fund Advisors(6)
400 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
|
|
3,746,759
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
Sectoral Asset Management Inc.(7)
2120-1000 Sherbrooke St.
West Montreal PQ H3A 3G4
|
|
3,669,629
|
|
5.71
|
%
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
Owned(1)
|
|
Beneficial Owner/Address
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D.(8)
|
|
1,502,873
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
Brent K. Blackburn, Ph.D.(9)
|
|
469,932
|
|
*
|
|
Santo J. Costa(10)
|
|
82,500
|
|
*
|
|
Joseph M. Davie, M.D., Ph.D.(11)
|
|
52,500
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas L. Gutshall(12)
|
|
107,711
|
|
*
|
|
Kenneth B. Lee, Jr.(13)
|
|
89,325
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas E. Shenk, Ph.D.(14)
|
|
61,000
|
|
*
|
|
Daniel K. Spiegelman(15)
|
|
462,390
|
|
*
|
|
Lewis J. Stuart(16)
|
|
269,232
|
|
*
|
|
Tricia Borga Suvari, Esq.(17)
|
|
385,208
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)(18)
|
|
3,482,671
|
|
5.36
|
%
|
*
|
Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent (1%).
|
(1)
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Beneficial ownership also
includes shares of stock subject to options and warrants currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within sixty (60) days of February 18, 2009, which is April 19, 2009. Except as indicated below, and subject
to community property laws where applicable, to the Companys knowledge, all persons named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. The percentages
of beneficial ownership are based on 64,234,229 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 18, 2009, adjusted as required by rules promulgated by the SEC. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares held by each person
or group of persons named above on a given date, any shares which such person or persons has the right to acquire within sixty (60) days after such date are deemed to be outstanding, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
|
(2)
|
All information regarding the stockholder, FMR LLC, and its affiliates, if any, is based on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed by the stockholder with the SEC
on February 17, 2009. Fidelity Management & Research Company (Fidelity), 82 Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC and an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, is the beneficial owner of 6,301,711 shares or 9.81% of the common stock outstanding of the Company as a result of acting as investment adviser to various investment companies registered under Section 8 of
the Investment Company Act of 1940. The ownership of one investment company, Fidelity Growth Company Fund, amounted to 6,091,083 shares or 9.48% of the common stock outstanding. Fidelity Growth Company Fund has its principal business office at 82
Devonshire Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. Edward C. Johnson 3d and FMR LLC, through its control of Fidelity, and the funds each has sole power to dispose of the 6,301,711 shares owned by the Funds. Members of the family of Edward C. Johnson
3d, Chairman of FMR LLC, are the predominant owners, directly or through trusts, of Series B voting common shares of FMR LLC, representing 49% of the voting power of FMR LLC. The Johnson family group and all other Series B shareholders have entered
into a shareholders voting agreement under which all Series B voting common shares will be voted in accordance with the majority vote of Series B voting common shares. Accordingly, through their ownership of voting common shares and the
execution of the shareholders voting agreement, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940, to form a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. Neither FMR LLC nor Edward C. Johnson 3d, Chairman of
FMR LLC, has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the Fidelity Funds, which power resides with the Funds Boards of Trustees. Fidelity carries out the voting of the shares under written guidelines
established by the Funds Boards of Trustees.
|
(3)
|
All information regarding the stockholder, Wellington Management Company, LLP (Wellington), and its affiliates, if any, is based on information disclosed in a
Schedule 13G/A filed by the stockholder with the SEC on February 17, 2009. Wellington is an investment adviser under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act.
|
(4)
|
All information regarding the stockholder, Ross Financial Corporation (Ross Financial), and its affiliates, if any, is based on information disclosed in a
Schedule 13G/A filed by the stockholder with the SEC on February 17, 2009. Ross Financial is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of STS Inc., a Cayman Islands company. Kenneth B. Dart is the beneficial owner of all of the outstanding
shares of STS Inc., which in turn owns all the outstanding shares of Ross Financial. As a result of his beneficial ownership of all of the outstanding shares of STS Inc., Mr. Dart is deemed to beneficially own the securities owned by Ross
Financial.
|
(5)
|
All information regarding the stockholder, Citigroup, Inc., and its affiliates, if any, is based on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed by the stockholder with
the SEC on January 28, 2009. Citigroup, Inc. is a parent holding company or control person under Rule 13d-1 of the Exchange Act.
|
(6)
|
All information regarding the stockholder, Barclays Global Investors, NA (Barclays Investors), and its affiliates, if any, and Barclays Global Fund Advisors
(Barclays Fund), and its affiliates, if any, is based on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G filed by the stockholder with the SEC on February 5, 2009. Barclays Investors is a bank as defined in Section 3(a)(6) of
the Exchange Act. Barclays Fund is an investment adviser under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act.
|
28
(7)
|
All information regarding the stockholder, Sectoral Asset Management Inc. (Sectoral), and its affiliates, if any, Jérôme G. Pfund and Michael L.
Sjöström is based on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed by the stockholder with the SEC on February 13, 2009. Sectoral is an investment adviser under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act and a parent
holding company or control person under Rule 13d-1 of the Exchange Act.
|
(8)
|
Includes 1,146,833 shares issuable upon the exercise of options on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Includes 34,050 RSUs, net of estimated shares withheld for
taxes, vested and released on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Does not include RSUs that will not be both vested and released on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Also includes 7,500 shares held in The Louis Lange Family
Trust and 2,500 shares held by minor(s) in Dr. Langes household. Dr. Lange disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in The Louis Lange Family Trust and of the shares held by minor(s) in Dr. Langes household,
except to the extent of his pecuniary interests therein.
|
(9)
|
Includes 423,958 shares issuable upon the exercise of options on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Includes 8,182 RSUs that will be vested and released on or within
60 days of February 18, 2009. Does not include RSUs that will not be both vested and released on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009.
|
(10)
|
Includes 82,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of options on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009.
|
(11)
|
Includes 52,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of options on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009.
|
(12)
|
Includes 72,500 shares issuable upon the exercise of options on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Also includes 30,211 shares held in the Gutshall Family Trust DTD
3-7-90. Mr. Gutshall disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in the Gutshall Family Trust, except to the extent of his pecuniary interests therein.
|
(13)
|
Includes 88,750 shares issuable upon the exercise of options on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009.
|
(14)
|
Includes 60,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009.
|
(15)
|
Includes 428,958 shares issuable upon the exercise of options on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Includes 8,182 RSUs, net of estimated shares withheld for taxes,
vested and released on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Does not include RSUs that will not be both vested and released on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Also includes 2,000 shares held by Mr. Spiegelmans
daughter. Mr. Spiegelman disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Mr. Spiegelmans daughter, except to the extent of his pecuniary interests therein.
|
(16)
|
Includes 240,158 shares issuable upon the exercise of options on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Includes 8,182 RSUs, net of estimated shares withheld for taxes,
vested and released on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Does not include RSUs that will not be both vested and released on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009.
|
(17)
|
Includes 363,958 shares issuable upon the exercise of options on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Includes 8,182 RSUs, net of estimated shares withheld for taxes,
vested and released on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Does not include RSUs that will not be both vested and released on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009.
|
(18)
|
Includes 2,960,115 shares issuable upon the exercise of options on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Includes 60,458 RSUs, net of estimated shares withheld for
taxes, vested and released on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Includes an additional estimated 6,362 RSUs, net of estimated shares withheld for taxes, that will be vested and released on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. Does
not include RSUs that will not be both vested and released on or within 60 days of February 18, 2009. See footnotes (8)(17).
|
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
|
The Company has
entered into an employment agreement with its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, as well as executive severance agreements with each of its other Named Executive Officers, each of which provides for severance benefits upon certain terminations of
employment. Each of the Companys executive officers is a Named Executive Officer.
CEO Employment Agreement
The Company entered into an amended and restated Employment Agreement (the Employment Agreement) with its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Dr. Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D., on December 1, 2007 that provides for Dr. Lange to serve as the Companys Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Science Officer.
Base Salary, Bonus, and Long-Term Incentive and Equity Compensation Awards
Under the Employment Agreement, the Company has agreed that it shall continue compensating Dr. Lange while he is employed as Chief Executive Officer in the same manner that it has done during his past and present employment with the
Company. The Employment Agreement further provides that Dr. Lange is to receive a minimum annual salary of $700,000, and that the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors shall review Dr. Langes base salary and annual bonus
compensation in relation to the Companys peer group and Dr. Langes principal peers, and in relation to his performance. As a result of these evaluations, the Compensation Committee may increase Dr. Langes base salary and
annual bonus compensation from time to time, provided that the target annual bonus for Dr. Lange during the term of the Employment Agreement shall be no less favorable than the target annual bonus for Dr. Lange as of the December 2005
effective date of his original employment agreement with the Company.
29
Term, Termination, Severance and Change of Control
The Employment Agreement has an eight (8)-year term from December 2005, provided that either the Company or Dr. Lange may terminate his employment at any time and for any reason. In the event of such a
termination by the Company without Cause or a resignation by Dr. Lange for Good Reason (as these terms are defined in the Employment Agreement), or if Dr. Langes employment with the Company ceases due to his death or disability, the
Company is required to make severance payments to Dr. Lange (or his beneficiaries) of two (2) times his base salary and of the amount equal to two (2) times his Average Annual Bonus (as defined in the Employment Agreement, which as
provided therein is calculated based on the annual bonuses payable to Dr. Lange under the Companys annual bonus programs for the three (3) full calendar years prior to the year of termination) as well as a pro rata amount of his
target annual bonus for the year of termination, the Company will pay health benefit premiums for Dr. Lange and his family for up to eighteen (18) months, and Dr. Lange is entitled to the full vesting of his outstanding stock options
as of the date of termination of employment, extended exercisability of his outstanding stock options for up to thirty-six (36) months following termination of employment, and Dr. Langes previously granted RSUs shall become vested as
to the number of RSUs that would have vested if he had continued working for the Company for an additional twelve (12) month period.
In addition, in
the event of a change of control of the Company, if Dr. Langes employment with the Company ceases within eighteen (18) months thereof as a result of a termination of employment by the Company without Cause or a resignation by
Dr. Lange for Good Reason, then Dr. Lange would receive all of the benefits described above, except that the Company would be obligated to continue to pay health benefit premiums for up to twenty-four (24) months, and in the event of
any such specified cessation of employment at any time after a change of control of the Company, then Dr. Lange would receive all of the foregoing benefits and, in addition, all of Dr. Langes unvested stock options, restricted stock
and other equity compensation, including RSUs, granted to Dr. Lange would immediately accelerate vesting as to 100% of the Shares subject to such options, restricted stock and other equity compensation.
In the event that any benefits under the Employment Agreement would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company
is required to make an additional gross-up payment sufficient to cover all excise taxes on such benefits as well as all taxes on the gross-up payment itself. The Employment Agreement provides that as consideration for the severance payments, as well
as any equity grants Dr. Lange may receive from the Company, Dr. Lange will be bound by a non-solicitation and non-competition covenant for a period of one year after termination of employment, a non-disparagement covenant for a
period of one year after termination of employment, and a confidentiality covenant. Dr. Lange must also execute a release of claims against the Company in order to be eligible for any severance under the Employment Agreement.
Additional Benefits.
During the term of the Employment Agreement,
Dr. Lange is entitled to receive from the Company a monthly automobile allowance of $1,000, reimbursement of certain expenses of up to $25,000 annually, and supplemental long-term disability insurance providing no less than $10,000 per month in
additional coverage.
Executive Severance Agreements
The executive severance agreements with each Named Executive Officer (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) provide that, in connection with a change of control of the Company, all outstanding stock options held by the Named
Executive Officer will automatically become fully vested and exercisable. The acceleration provided by the executive severance agreements is in addition to that provided pursuant to the terms of the Company, 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (the
2000 Incentive Plan). Under the 2000 Incentive Plan, pursuant to which all grants to Named Executive Officers which are currently unvested have been made, in the event of a change of control of the Company, each outstanding stock award
under the 2000 Incentive Plan shall, automatically and without further action by the Company, become fully vested and/or exercisable with respect to all of the Shares subject thereto, and all Shares subject to outstanding RSUs shall be distributed
to holders thereof, no later than five (5) business days before the closing of such change of control. However, in August 2007 the Named Executive Officers, including Dr. Lange, received grants of stock options and RSUs that waive these
provisions of the executive severance agreements and the 2000 Incentive Plan and provide instead, with respect to such August 2007 grants only, that such outstanding stock options and RSUs shall, automatically and without further action by the
Company, become fully vested and/or exercisable with respect to all of the Shares subject thereto, and all Shares subject to such RSUs shall be distributed to holders thereof, if the holder thereof has a separation from service from the Company that
is a Covered Termination (as defined in the executive severance agreements with each Named Executive Officer other than Dr. Lange) within 13 months following a change of control of the Company, or due to a termination without Cause or
resignation for Good Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement with Dr. Lange).
In addition, under the executive severance agreements with each
Named Executive Officer (other than the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), if the Named Executive Officer has a separation from service from the Company that is a Covered Termination (as defined in the executive severance agreements) by the
Company within thirteen (13) months following a change of control of the Company, the Named Executive Officer is entitled to receive severance benefits, including the following: payments equal to eighteen (18) months of the Named Executive
Officers base salary at the time of termination and equal to 150% of the Named Executive Officers annual bonus (if any) in the year prior to the change of control; eighteen (18) months continued health benefits; and in the
30
event that any benefits would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, an additional gross-up payment
sufficient to cover all excise taxes on such benefits as well as all taxes on the gross-up payment itself. The Named Executive Officers must execute a general release of claims against the Company in order to be eligible to receive severance under
the executive severance agreements. In March 2009, the Board of Directors amended the executive severance agreements to clarify that the bonus calculation described above applies to bonuses earned in the year prior to termination.
Ernst & Young LLP
Kenneth B. Lee, Jr., who was appointed to
the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors in January 2002, was a partner at Ernst & Young LLP until December 31, 2001. Ernst & Young LLP has audited the Companys consolidated financial
statements since its inception and has been selected by the Board of Directors as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. While at Ernst & Young LLP, Mr. Lee
was the partner in charge of auditing the Companys financial statements prior to 1995. Prior to appointing Mr. Lee to the Board of Directors and to the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors determined that Mr. Lees prior
relationship with Ernst & Young LLP would not hinder their respective independence or ability to act in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, Mr. Lees ability to serve on the Board of Directors and the Audit
Committee, or Ernst & Young LLPs ability to serve as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Lee satisfies the independence requirements for
board members under Rule 4200(a)(15) of the National Association of Securities Dealers listing standards, and also satisfies the independence requirements for members of the Audit Committee under Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act.
Director Independence
The Board of Directors has
determined that all of the members of the Board of Directors, other than Dr. Lange, are independent as that term is defined in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. Dr. Lange is not considered independent because he is an executive
officer of the Company. As required under applicable Nasdaq Marketplace Rules, the independent directors meet regularly in executive sessions at which only they are present. Mr. Lee has served as lead non-employee director since May 2008.
The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. The Board of Directors has adopted a
charter for each of these three (3) standing committees.
Board Committees
Audit Committee
The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to oversee the accounting and financial reporting
processes of the Company and the audits of the financial statements of the Company. The Audit Committee is also charged with the review of all related party transactions involving the Company on an ongoing basis for potential conflicts of interest,
and all such transactions must be approved by the Audit Committee. A more complete description of the powers and responsibilities delegated to the Audit Committee is set forth in the Audit Committee charter. During the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, the Audit Committee was composed at all times of three (3) non-employee directors. Messrs. Gutshall and Lee served on the Audit Committee during the entire fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. Dr. McNeil served
on the Audit Committee until her departure from the Board of Directors in May 2008, and Dr. Shenk joined the Audit Committee in May 2008 immediately following Dr. McNeils departure. Mr. Lee served as Chair. The Board of
Directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent as that term is defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that each member of
the Audit Committee also satisfies the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors has further determined that Mr. Lee is an audit committee financial expert as defined by
Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Compensation Committee
The primary purpose of the Compensation Committee is to recommend compensation levels for all Named Executive Officers and other officers and employees, including the
larger senior management group, of the Company, and to administer the Companys equity incentive plans. A more complete description of the powers and responsibilities delegated to the Compensation Committee is set forth in the Compensation
Committee charter. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Compensation Committee was composed of three (3) non-employee directors, Messrs. Costa and Lee and Dr. Davie. Mr. Costa served as Chair. The Board of
Directors has determined that all of the members of the Compensation Committee are independent as defined in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.
Nominating and Governance Committee
The primary purpose of the Nominating and Governance Committee is to establish qualification standards
for board membership, identify qualified individuals for board membership, consider and recommend director nominees for approval by the Board of Directors and the stockholders and oversee the administration of bylaw provisions relating to
stockholder recommendations for
31
director nominees. The Nominating and Governance Committee also monitors the independence of members of the Board of Directors under applicable Nasdaq and
SEC standards, oversees the Board of Directors annual self-evaluation and oversees and approves the membership of the boards of directors of any of the Companys subsidiaries. A more complete description of the powers and responsibilities
delegated to the Nominating and Governance Committee is set forth in the Nominating and Governance Committee charter. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Nominating and Governance Committee was composed at all times of three
(3) non-employee directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee included Drs. McNeil and Shenk and Mr. Hutt until May 2008, at which time Messrs. Costa, Gutshall and Lee became the three (3) committee members. Mr. Gutshall
served as Chair. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee is independent as defined in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules.
Item 14.
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
and Services
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or to be billed by Ernst & Young LLP for the following services for the
year ended December 31, 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description of Services
|
|
2007 Fees
|
|
2008 Fees
|
Audit fees (1)
|
|
$
|
847,700
|
|
$
|
875,277
|
|
|
|
Tax fees (2)
|
|
|
68,000
|
|
|
57,865
|
|
|
|
All other fees (3)
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
919,200
|
|
$
|
938,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Audit Fees:
represent the aggregate fees billed or to be billed for professional services rendered for the audits of the Companys annual consolidated financial
statements and for internal control over financial reporting and for the review of the financial statements included in the Companys quarterly reports during such period, or for services that are normally provided by the independent registered
public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, for example, in 2007 and 2008, audit fees include accounting consultations and review of registration statements on Form S-8.
|
(2)
|
Tax Fees:
represent the aggregate fees billed or to be billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, for example, fees incurred in 2007 for the Companys
2006 federal tax return extension, various 2006 state tax return extensions and returns, and tax advisory services for our European subsidiary.
|
(3)
|
All Other Fees:
represent the aggregate fees billed for products and services other than audit, audit-related and tax fees for example, fees incurred in 2007 and 2008 for a
license to an online accounting research tool.
|
Pre-Approval Policy and Procedures
In accordance with the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committees policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent
registered public accounting firm, including the estimated fees and other terms of any such engagement. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Any pre-approval is detailed as to the
particular service or category of services. The Audit Committee may elect to delegate pre-approval authority to one or more designated committee members in accordance with its charter. The Audit Committee considers whether such audit or non-audit
services are consistent with the SECs rules on auditor independence. All of the services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
32
PART IV
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a)(3) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
(b) Exhibits
See Exhibits listed under Item 15(a)(3) above.
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 10-K/A to be signed on its behalf, by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Palo Alto, County of Santa Clara, State of California, on April 6, 2009.
|
|
|
CV THERAPEUTICS, INC.
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/
S
/ L
OUIS
G. L
ANGE
|
|
|
Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D.
Chairman of the Board of CV Therapeutics
Chief Executive
Officer
|
34
CV Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CVTX)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Mai 2024 até Jun 2024
CV Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CVTX)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jun 2023 até Jun 2024