ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Except as expressly stated or
the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” and
“GNOG” refer to Golden Nugget Online Gaming, Inc.
We are an online gaming, or
iGaming, and digital sports entertainment company focused on providing our customers with the most enjoyable, realistic and exciting
online gaming experience in the market. We currently operate in New Jersey and Michigan where we offer patrons the ability to play
their favorite casino games and bet on live-action sports events. Our desire to innovate, improve and offer the most realistic
online gaming platform drives our employees and defines our business, as we pursue our vision to be the leading destination for
online gaming players with a modern mindset. We maintain an expansive catalogue of online casino games in the New Jersey market
with over 800 titles.
We are authorized by the New
Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (“DGE”) and the Michigan Gaming Control Board (“MGCB”) to operate
interactive real money online gaming in New Jersey and Michigan. We were one of the first online gaming operators to enter the
New Jersey market in 2013 and one of the first to enter the Michigan market in January of 2021. As an affiliate of the Golden
Nugget/Landry’s (“GNL”) family of companies, we aspire to live up to the reputation of Golden Nugget, a storied
brand in the gaming industry, by providing customers with an online gaming experience consistent with Golden Nugget’s land-based
casinos. Our technology is designed to create superior online betting experiences for the avid casino and sports bettor. Our goals
have been shaped with these players in mind, both in who he or she is today and who we anticipate he or she will become as the
gaming industry evolves. The Golden Nugget vision underpins our position as a market leader and innovator in today’s rapidly
expanding online gaming industry.
We
believe we are well-positioned for continued growth with the support of the Golden Nugget brand and its seasoned management team,
together with its commitment to innovation. We believe that this enviable combination of expertise, brand recognition and
infrastructure will not only support our continued success in the New Jersey market, but also allow the company to capture market
share in other key iGaming states in the future. We recently entered the Michigan market, and are currently targeting Pennsylvania,
West Virginia, Virginia and Illinois as states in which we plan to enter in the near future, subject to regulatory approvals, while
continuing to evaluate entry into additional markets.
We have experienced
tremendous growth since we began operations. According to information published by the DGE, as of December 31, 2020, our market
share in the New Jersey online gaming market was 11%. Our gross gaming revenues, or GGR (as defined below), have grown from $9.6
million in 2014 to $60.9 million in 2019, and $101.9 million in 2020. In addition, we have steadily grown our average monthly net
casino revenue per depositing user (“Net Casino ARPU”) from $467 in 2014 to $566 in 2019, and $631 in 2020. Our GGR
is defined as the sum of all customer wagers (including the amount of all promotional credits wagered by such customers), minus
all winnings paid to such customers on such wagers. For purposes of calculating our GGR, we include only settled wagers, and exclude
all pending online casino or online sports bets which have not yet settled (e.g., sports bets on sports events that have not concluded
as of the date of determination of GGR).
Corporate History
Golden
Nugget Online Gaming, Inc. (formerly known as Landcadia Holdings II, Inc. or “Landcadia”) was
originally incorporated as CAPS Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company on August 11, 2015 and converted into a
Delaware corporation on February 4, 2019 for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition,
stock purchase, reorganization, recapitalization or other similar business combination with one or more businesses.
On May 9, 2019, Landcadia consummated an initial public offering, after which its securities began trading on The Nasdaq
Capital Market LLC.
On
December 29, 2020 we completed the acquisition of Golden Nugget Online Gaming, LLC (formerly known as Golden Nugget Online
Gaming, Inc.) (“GNOG LLC”),, a New Jersey limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of GNOG Holdco
(as defined below). The acquisition was completed pursuant to the purchase agreement, dated June 28, 2020 (as amended
on September 17, 2020 and December 20, 2020) by and among the Company, LHGN HoldCo, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company and newly formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Landcadia Holdco”),
Landry’s Fertitta, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“LF LLC”), GNOG Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company and newly formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of LF LLC (“GNOG Holdco”), and GNOG LLC. Following
the closing of the acquisition, we changed our name from “Landcadia Holdings II, Inc.” to “Golden Nugget
Online Gaming, Inc.”
GNOG LLC was
incorporated in New Jersey in February 2011 under the name Landry’s A/C Gaming, Inc., which was subsequently changed
to Landry’s Finance Acquisition Co. in November 2011 and ultimately Golden Nugget Online Gaming, Inc. on May 6,
2020. In December 2020 and in connection with the transaction, GNOG Inc. converted into a limited liability company by merging
with and into GNOG LLC.
We operate as
an umbrella partnership C-corporation, or “Up-C,” meaning that substantially all of our assets are held indirectly
through GNOG LLC, our indirect subsidiary, and our business is conducted through GNOG LLC.
Industry
Background/Market Opportunity
We are focused
on becoming a leader in U.S. online gaming, which is a fast-growing part of the larger U.S. gaming industry. iGaming includes all
online casino games played on a computer or mobile device such as slots, video poker, electronic table games and live dealer table
games, but does not include online sports wagering. The iGaming market includes both “Pure Casino” players who sign
up for the primary purpose of playing online casino games, such as slots or table games, as well as sports betting players who
also want to play casino games. According to the DGE, the iGaming market in New Jersey has grown significantly, from approximately
$221 million in total iGaming revenues in 2017 to approximately $462 million in 2019.
The current
COVID-19 pandemic has served as a catalyst to accelerate growth in the U.S. iGaming industry as many people are spending more time
at home. The pandemic has changed the way people work and live, with an increased use and dependence on technology and a need for
at-home entertainment options. The number of people engaging in iGaming has increased significantly as a result of these changes,
some of which are currently expected to continue for an indefinite period of time or may become permanent. Total iGaming revenues
in New Jersey for 2020 were $931.5 million, representing a 101.7% increase over the same period in 2019, according to the DGE.
We operate real
money online gaming within the State of New Jersey, and since January 2021, in the State of Michigan. We are also contracted
to manage certain third parties that are also authorized to operate real money online gaming in New Jersey, for which we receive
royalties and cost reimbursement. Today, iGaming is legal in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Michigan, and West Virginia, and
online sports betting is legal in fourteen states and the District of Columbia. In addition, legislation to legalize iGaming and/or
sports betting is pending in several states. We anticipate that legalization of iGaming and online sports betting will expand across
the U.S. as states understand and appreciate the revenue potential.
Over the last
few years, iGaming revenue as a percentage of land-based gaming revenue has grown. Based on data released by the DGE, between 2016
and 2019, iGaming revenue grew from 7% to 17% of land-based gaming revenue in New Jersey. For 2020, iGaming revenue in New Jersey
represented 62% of land-based gaming revenue, according to data published by the DGE. On March 16, 2020, all Atlantic City
land-based casinos were required to close because of the governmental response to the COVD-19 pandemic. In January, February and
March 2020, online gaming revenues represented 27.7%, 23.0% and 75.8% of Atlantic City land-based casino gaming revenues,
respectively. During April, May and June 2020, Atlantic City land-based casino gaming revenues was $0. Atlantic City
casinos reopened on July 2, 2020, resulting in the percentage of online gaming revenues compared to Atlantic City land-based
casino gaming revenues decreasing to 65.6% for the month of December 2020. The increase in online gaming revenues in 2020
is attributable, in part, to the temporary closure of Atlantic City casinos, leading traditional casino players to utilize online
gaming. Nonetheless, we believe the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the growth trend in online gaming. Our management estimates
that, on a run-rate basis, the iGaming market in the U.S. over time will achieve 30% penetration versus the land-based market.
Based on nationwide land-based commercial and tribal gaming revenues of $75 billion in 2018, 30% penetration implies a $22 billion
revenue potential in the long-term U.S. iGaming market.
Our Competitive Strengths
Our competitive strengths include:
|
•
|
The strength of the Golden Nugget brand;
|
|
•
|
iGaming focus targeting high value customers;
|
|
•
|
Profitable customer acquisition;
|
|
•
|
Market-leading innovation and content;
|
|
•
|
Continued support from Golden Nugget;
|
|
•
|
Seasoned management team of industry experts;
|
|
•
|
Best-in-class customer support; and
|
|
•
|
Proven operator with industry recognition.
|
Strength of the Golden Nugget Brand
One of the unique features that
has contributed to our success is our affiliation with GNL and Tilman Fertitta, GNL’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
and our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. GNL is a household name in the U.S., with a diversified restaurant, hospitality,
entertainment and gaming portfolio that includes:
|
•
|
two amusement parks; and
|
|
•
|
five Golden Nugget casinos.
|
The Golden Nugget name is a well-known and storied brand in
the gaming industry. Celebrated since opening as a gambling hall in Las Vegas in 1946, Golden Nugget today is associated with
gaming and high-quality service at an attractive value. Golden Nugget maintains a geographically diverse portfolio of five land-based
casinos: Golden Nugget Las Vegas, Nevada; Golden Nugget Laughlin, Nevada; Golden Nugget Lake Charles, Louisiana; Golden Nugget
Biloxi, Mississippi; and Golden Nugget Atlantic City, New Jersey. The Golden Nugget casino properties offer popular slot machines
and table games as well as a wide selection of amenities.
As the online gaming affiliate
of Golden Nugget Atlantic City, we have taken the best aspects of its legacy brand and modified them to attract today’s online
gaming customer.
Tilman Fertitta is an internationally
recognized businessman with a significant media presence throughout the U.S. According to CNBC, Mr. Fertitta’s TV show,
“Billion Dollar Buyer,” was the network’s “most watched premiere hour ever” in 2016 and has aired
three successful seasons. In addition, he is a New York Times Best-Selling author with his book “Shut Up and Listen,”
which outlines his business philosophies. In addition to GNL, Mr. Fertitta is the sole owner of the NBA’s Houston Rockets.
Our brand has been significantly enhanced through Mr. Fertitta’s promotion and support of our company.
iGaming Focus Targeting High Value Customers
As one of the only true iGaming-focused
online gaming companies, we believe we are well positioned to continue to acquire the highest value customers in the iGaming market.
While we offer both iGaming and online sports betting, our management believes the combination of higher lifetime player value
(“LTV”) and player demographics of iGaming players creates a superior value proposition for iGaming. As a result, we
intend to focus our efforts on acquiring high value iGaming players. Nevertheless, we believe offering online sports betting increases
our competitive advantage because many online sports betting players also choose to play casino games.
A key
to our success is our superior ability to acquire and retain the highest value iGaming players, resulting in higher engagement as
measured by LTV. We believe that the average iGaming player plays longer, reinvests his or her winnings more quickly and has a
higher disposable income, all of which contributes to a higher total engagement per active month than land-based casino players and
online sports bettors. As of December 31, 2020, our five-year gross LTV in gross gaming revenue was approximately $7,671,
which we believe is greater than that of our competitors. In addition, we have steadily grown our Net Casino ARPU from $467 in 2014
to $566 in 2019, and $631 in 2020.
Player demographics for our
iGaming players are relatively split between gender, with around 55% of customers being male and 45% being female. In contrast,
approximately 95% of our online sports bettors are male. Similarly, our average iGaming player is between 40 and 45 years old,
whereas our online sports player tends to be between 30 and 35 years old.
Profitable Customer Acquisition
Another component of our success
is our ability to attract new high value customers through GNL’s customer database. Landry’s Select Club, a restaurant
loyalty program implemented in 2009 by GNL, had over 3 million members as of December 31, 2020, and prior to the outbreak
of COVID-19, was adding more than 5,500 members per week. Approximately 18% of GNL’s restaurant sales are associated with
Landry’s Select Club transactions. The Golden Nugget 24k Select Club, a loyalty program for Golden Nugget casino customers,
had over 3.9 million members as of December 31, 2020, and prior to the outbreak of COVID-19, was adding over 7,000 new members
per week on average since July of 2019. In 2019, approximately 80% of rated play revenue at Golden Nugget casinos was associated
with 24k members. Management believes that access to this database is an advantage in promoting our products to new customers and
will accelerate our growth into new jurisdictions as the legalization of online gaming spreads across the U.S.
In addition to using the GNL
databases, we target our marketing efforts through high-quality traffic sources including TV advertising, targeted digital spend,
and extensive relationships with leading affiliates in the U.S. market to increase our customer base. As is typical in high-growth
industries, we believe most companies in the online gaming vertical to date have allocated a disproportionate amount of their capital
to marketing and advertising to build a customer database in the hopes of capturing market share. In contrast, we have been able
to keep customer acquisition costs relatively low as a percentage of our revenue while achieving significant growth. We estimate
that new players typically reach a break-even return on investment, or ROI, by month five, earn the company an approximately 2.2x
ROI by year one, and an approximately 8.0x ROI by year five, in each case where ROI is calculated as cumulative GGR divided by
advertising spend.
Market-Leading Innovation and Content
We offer customers a superior
platform for iGaming with what we believe to be a best-in-class iGaming content mix, combined with continued innovation and new
product offerings. As of December 31, 2020, we offered over 800 game titles in New Jersey, which we believe gives us a significant
lead in the New Jersey market in terms of total available content. We believe that our ability to offer a wider array of iGaming
products effectively reduces our customer acquisition costs and player churn by providing a superior product offering as compared
to our competitors.
We believe that our commitment
to innovation is demonstrated by consistently being first-to-market with the latest iGaming offerings:
|
•
|
Live Dealer Studio. We were the first company to launch a Live Dealer studio in the United States. The Live Dealer studio provides
a more realistic environment for customers through interactions with a live dealer and fellow players, which our management believes
has been a significant factor in convincing casino players to use iGaming. Because of the success of the Live Dealer studio, we
have 18 tables in our Live Dealer studio as of December 31, 2020, increased from four tables when we first offered this product
in 2016.
|
|
•
|
Golden Nugget Branded Video Slot Games. We believe that we were also the first to offer a branded video slot game online, the
“Golden Nugget Video Slot,” which gives players the experience of being in one of Golden Nugget’s land-based
casinos.
|
|
•
|
New Games. We have been successful in introducing new game categories to its customers, such as Steppers and Megaways.
|
We are well
positioned to maintain our status as an online gaming innovator through our strategic partnerships with the top gaming equipment
suppliers in the industry, including Scientific Games Digital (“SGD”). We have a multi-year, multi-state, multi-product,
multi-channel agreement with SGD for iGaming and sports betting, whereby SGD provides us with its core platform (Player Account
Management, Wallet, Bonusing Tools), online casino platform (Open Gaming System), and online games, and has agreed to provide us
with its online sports betting platform and sports managed trading services through June 30, 2024 in New Jersey, and will
provide such platforms and services in the future for terms of generally three or four years following specified milestone events
such as the initial deployment of our software in a state or of any additional vertical in Nevada, Mississippi and Pennsylvania.
This and other partnerships have enabled us to launch 20 exclusive games in 2020, with 80 more games that are expected to be released
from the date hereof through the end of 2021.
Continued Support from GNL
We receive significant
support from GNL through several contractual arrangements described below. We believe our relationship with GNL is highly constructive
and will enable us to be successful in the long-term. Set forth below is a summary of the terms of these contractual arrangements.
Trademark
License Agreement. Pursuant to this agreement, GNLV has granted to GNOG LLC an exclusive license to use certain “Golden
Nugget” trademarks (and other trademarks related to GNOG LLC’s business) in connection with operating online real money casino
gambling and sports wagering in the U.S. and any of its territories, subject to certain restrictions. The license has a twenty-year term
that commenced on December 29, 2020, the date that we completed the acquisition of GNOG LLC (the “Closing Date”). During
the term of the agreement, GNOG LLC has agreed to pay Golden Nugget a monthly royalty payment equal to 3% of net gaming revenue (as such
term is defined in such agreement). Upon the tenth and fifteenth anniversary of the effective date of the Trademark License Agreement,
the monthly royalty amount payable to GNLV will be adjusted to equal the greater of (i) 3% of net gaming revenue and (ii) the
fair market value of the licenses (as determined by an independent appraiser, if necessary).
While the trademarks
licensed under the Trademark License Agreement generally will be exclusively licensed to GNOG LLC, in the event that (i) a
new market or opportunity becomes available (e.g., pursuant to the legalization of online gaming in another jurisdiction), and
(ii) GNOG LLC is unwilling, unable or otherwise fails to pursue such market or opportunity, Golden Nugget will be permitted
to pursue such market or opportunity and utilize the trademarks covered by the Trademark License Agreement with respect thereto.
For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in the Trademark License Agreement will restrict GNOG LLC (or Golden Nugget) from owning or
operating an online-based casino using marks that are not covered by the Trademark License Agreement.
A&R
Online Gaming Operations Agreement with GNAC. Pursuant to this agreement, GNAC granted GNOG LLC the right to host, manage,
control, operate, support and administer, under GNAC’s land-based casino operating licenses, the Golden Nugget-branded online
gaming business, live dealer studio in New Jersey and the third-party operators. Under the agreement, GNOG LLC is responsible for
managing, administering and operating its online gaming business and providing services to GNAC in connection with the management
and administration of certain platform agreements and GNAC is required to provide certain operational and infrastructure services
to GNOG LLC in connection with its New Jersey operations. In addition to the 3% royalty payable pursuant to the Trademark License
Agreement as described above, GNOG LLC is also obligated to reimburse GNAC for certain expenses incurred by GNAC in connection
with the New Jersey online gaming business, such as New Jersey licensing costs, regulatory fees, certain gaming taxes and other
expenses incurred by GNAC directly in connection with GNOG LLC’s operations in New Jersey. The A&R Online Gaming Operations
Agreement has a term of five years commencing from April 2020 and is renewable by GNOG LLC for an additional five-year term.
The A&R Online Gaming Operations Agreement also provides for, among other things, (a) minimum performance standards under
which GNOG LLC is required to operate the Golden Nugget online gaming business, and (b) an arms-length risk allocation framework
(including with respect to insurance and indemnification obligations).
Other
Agreements. Pursuant to the Services Agreement, GNAC and Golden Nugget have agreed to provide certain services and facilities,
including payroll, accounting, financial planning and other agreed upon services, to GNOG LLC from time to time and GNOG LLC has
agreed to provide continued management, consulting and administrative services to Golden Nugget’s applicable subsidiary in
connection with retail sports wagering conducted and such subsidiary’s brick-and-mortar casino. Under this agreement, each
party is responsible for its own expenses and the employer of any shared employee is responsible for such shared employee’s
total compensation. GNOG LLC is also obligated to reimburse the party providing the service or facilities at cost. In addition,
at Closing, GNOG LLC entered into the Office Leases with Golden Nugget, GNAC and/or their respective affiliates for the use of
certain office space in Atlantic City, New Jersey, and Houston, Texas.
Agreement
with Danville Development. On November 18, 2020, GNOG LLC entered into a definitive agreement with Danville Development,
LLC (“Danville Development”) for market access to the State of Illinois. Danville Development is a joint venture between
Wilmot Gaming Illinois, LLC and GN Danville, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Golden Nugget and an affiliate of GNOG LLC, formed
to build a new Golden Nugget branded casino in Danville, Illinois, pending obtaining all regulatory approvals. GN Danville,
LLC will own a 25% equity interest in Danville Development and has an option to purchase the other equity interests in the future
at a price to be determined pursuant to the definitive agreement. The definitive agreement has a term of 20 years and requires GNOG
LLC to pay Danville Development a percentage of its online net gaming revenue, subject to minimum royalty payments over the term.
In addition, under the definitive agreement, GNOG LLC holds the exclusive right to offer online sports wagering and, if permitted
by law in the future, online casino wagering. GNOG LLC has committed to cause to be provided a mezzanine loan in the amount of
$30.0 million to Danville Development, which will indirectly benefit GN Danville, LLC, for the development and construction of
the casino.
Seasoned Management Team of Industry
Experts
We are led by
a seasoned management team of industry experts that enable the company to continue to achieve success in the online gaming space.
Tilman Fertitta, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, has established himself as one of the preeminent businessmen in the
United States regardless of industry focus. Mr. Fertitta has an extensive track record in the consumer, hospitality and gaming
sectors with over 30 years of experience. Thomas Winter, our President, is a gaming industry veteran and has served as Senior Vice-President
and General Manager of the online gaming division of Landry’s LLC for seven years. Prior to Landry’s LLC, Mr. Winter
served as Chief Executive Officer of Betclic, a major European online sports betting and gaming operator, which merged with Expekt.com.
Best-In-Class Customer Support
We strive to
provide our patrons with a best-in-class customer support network and unparalleled service. We believe that this commitment to
excellent customer service has enabled us to retain more of our acquired players by offering users the live support needed to facilitate
an enjoyable online gaming experience. Our customer service representatives, who are available via phone, live chat, email and
help center 24 hours of the day, seven days a week, have an average of three years of experience in the online gaming industry,
providing users with a knowledgeable network of professionals to facilitate connectivity with our interface, answer questions and
improve user play. Our commitment to our customers has resulted in superb customer support reviews.
Based on a survey
of over 27,000 customers, we earned a customer satisfaction rate of 96% in 2019. Based on our bi-weekly statistics that we reported
to the DGE, in 2019 our inbound answer rate for customer calls was 95%, meaning that 95% of customer calls were answered by a live
customer support agent before going to voicemail.
Proven Operator with Industry
Recognition
Since our inception, we have consistently
been recognized as one of the best online gaming operators in the United States. We have received the following awards:
|
•
|
eGaming Review (“EGR”) North America’s Operator of the Year award in 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020;
|
|
•
|
EGR North America’s Casino Operator of the Year award in 2017, 2018 and 2019;
|
|
•
|
EGR North America’s Acquisition Strategy award in 2017, 2018 and 2019;
|
|
•
|
EGR North America’s Best New Game award in 2019;
|
|
•
|
EGR North America’s Mobile Operator of the Year award; and
|
|
•
|
iGaming North America’s Operator of the Year award in 2015, 2016 and 2017.
|
While we do not benchmark our success on industry awards and
recognition, we believe these awards help to demonstrate our established cutting-edge, online gaming platform.
Short-Term
Growth Plan and Opportunities
Currently,
we are targeting Pennsylvania, Illinois, West Virginia and Virginia as states we plan to enter in the near future,
subject to regulatory approvals. However, as the legalization of iGaming expands in the U.S., we intend to evaluate the financial
viability of entering other new markets. We commenced operations in Michigan in January 2021.
Michigan
We began offering iGaming and
online sports betting in Michigan in January 2021 through an arrangement with a licensed Tribal casino. According to the Michigan
Lawful Internet Gaming Act, as of December 31, 2020, Michigan has authorized up to 15 licenses for iGaming (three commercial
land-based casinos and 12 Tribes), and the applicable Michigan law allows for only one iGaming operating brand per licensee.
On June 17,
2020, we entered into a market access agreement with Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, a federally recognized Indian tribe (“KBIC”),
pursuant to which KBIC agreed to grant us the right operate a “Golden Nugget” branded online casino (including, at our discretion,
online poker) and online sportsbook in the State of Michigan under KBIC’s casino license held in connection with KBIC’s ownership
of the Ojibwa Casinos located in Baraga, Michigan and Marquette, Michigan. The initial term is 15 years with an optional ten-year
renewal period.
Pennsylvania
We and
GNL are pursuing regulatory approvals to enter the iGaming market in Pennsylvania. iGaming was legalized in Pennsylvania in July 2019,
shortly after the legalization of online sports betting in that state in November 2018. As of December 31, 2020, there are
11 total licenses (primary and Qualified Gaming Entity (as defined below)) available in the Pennsylvania market for online gaming operators,
with no limits on skins (as defined below). According to the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, in December 2020, there were 10
licenses operating iGaming under 13 different brands in Pennsylvania generating approximately $68.9 million in aggregate gaming revenues.
We
are seeking regulatory approvals to be licensed as a “Qualified Gaming Entity” in Pennsylvania, and as a result will not
be subject to market access royalties. As a Qualified Gaming Entity, we will also have the option, subject to regulatory approvals,
to partner with competing online gaming companies (“skins”) in a revenue share arrangement. The estimated cost of the
online slots and online table gaming certificates necessary to offer online casino games in Pennsylvania is $8.0 million. Pending
issuance of the appropriate licenses and approvals, we currently expect to launch our iGaming operations in Pennsylvania in late
third quarter or early fourth quarter of 2021.
Illinois
We are pursuing
online sports betting, and once legalized, iGaming in Illinois through an arrangement with Danville Development, LLC (“Danville
Development”). Danville Development is a joint venture between Wilmot Gaming Illinois, LLC and GN Danville, LLC, a wholly
owned subsidiary of Golden Nugget and an affiliate of GNOG LLC, formed to build a new Golden Nugget branded casino in Danville, Illinois,
pending obtaining all regulatory approvals. Online sports betting was legalized in Illinois in June 2019. According to amended
Senate Bill 690, as of December 31, 2020, Illinois has authorized up to 22 statewide licenses for online sports betting
(10 existing casinos, 6 new casinos, 3 racetracks and 3 untethered), and the applicable Illinois law allows for only one brand
per licensee.
On November 18,
2020, we entered into a market access agreement with Danville Development, LLC which will give us the exclusive right to offer
online sports wagering and, if permitted by future legislation, iGaming wagering in the State of Illinois. The initial term of
the agreement between us and Danville Development, LLC is 20 years and requires GNOG LLC to pay a percentage of its online
net gaming revenue, subject to minimum royalty payments over the term. In addition, we have committed to cause to be provided a
mezzanine loan in the amount of $30.0 million to Danville Development, LLC for the development and construction of the casino.
Pending issuance of the appropriate licenses and approvals, we currently expect to launch our online sports betting operations
in Illinois by the end of 2021.
West Virginia
We are pursuing
iGaming and online sports betting in West Virginia through an arrangement with Greenbrier Hotel Corporation. Online sports betting
was legalized in West Virginia in March 2018 and iGaming in March 2019. According to the West Virginia Lottery Interactive
Wagering Act and the West Virginia Lottery Sports Wagering Act, as of December 31, 2020, West Virginia has authorized up to
5 statewide licenses for online sports betting and iGaming each, and the applicable West Virginia laws allow for three brands
per licensee.
On
November 20, 2020, we entered into a market access agreement with Greenbrier Hotel Corporation which will give us the right to offer
online sports wagering and iGaming wagering in the State of West Virginia. The agreement is for 10 years and will allow us to use
the “Golden Nugget” brand. As part of the agreement, we GNOG LLC will be paying a percentage of its online net gaming
revenue, subject to making minimum royalty payments to Greenbrier Hotel Corporation over the term. Pending issuance of the appropriate
licenses and approvals, GNOG currently expects to launch its iGaming and online sports betting operations in West Virginia by the end
of the second quarter of 2021.
New Jersey
We also plan
to continue investing heavily in our New Jersey online gaming operations to retain market share and continue to acquire new high
value customers. While we are a market leader in the New Jersey iGaming market, our management believes the potential for growing
our share of the online sports betting market represents a lucrative opportunity based on our management’s estimates that
the online sports betting market in New Jersey will be $800.0 million by 2025
as measured by gaming revenues. Based on a report released by the DGE on January 13, 2021, there are seven iGaming permit
holders in New Jersey. Each holder of an iGaming permit may grant up to five iGaming skins and each holder of a sports wagering
license may grant up to three online sports wagering skins.
Intellectual Property
We do not currently own any
registered intellectual property. Our intellectual property portfolio consists substantially of licensed intellectual property,
including the “GOLDEN NUGGET” trademarks licensed pursuant to the Trademark License Agreement with Golden Nugget and
GNLV, each of which are our affiliates.
Pursuant to the Trademark License
Agreement, GNLV granted GNOG LLC an exclusive license to use certain “GOLDEN NUGGET” trademarks (and other trademarks
related to its business) and domain names, including goldennuggetcasino.com, solely in connection with online real money casino
gambling and sports wagering in the U.S. and any of its territories.
In addition to the intellectual
property licensed by GNOG LLC under the Trademark License Agreement, we license certain third-party intellectual property (such
as our platform and/or games) under licenses and service agreements with those third parties to operate our online real money casino
gambling and sports wagering business, including through agreements with gaming content creators and service providers. Although
we believe the licenses under the Trademark License Agreement and these third-party agreements are sufficient for the operation
of our business, these licenses limit the use of the licensed intellectual property in specific manners and for specific time periods
and we rely entirely on such rights granted by third parties or affiliates to operate our business. We may also rely in part on
the counterparties to the Trademark License Agreement and such other third-party agreements to appropriately register, protect
and defend the licensed intellectual property.
Companies in the gaming, sports
betting, casino, technology and other industries may own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trade secrets, and trademarks and
may frequently request license agreements, threaten litigation or file suit against us based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation,
or other violations of intellectual property rights. From time to time, we may face allegations by third parties, including our
competitors and non-practicing entities, that we have infringed, misappropriated, or otherwise violated their trademarks, copyrights,
trade secrets, patents and other intellectual property rights. As our business grows, we will likely face more claims of infringement.
Government Regulation
We are subject to various U.S.
and foreign laws and regulations that affect our ability to operate in the iGaming and sports betting industries. These industries
are generally subject to extensive and evolving regulations that could change based on political and social norms and that could
be interpreted in ways that could negatively impact our business.
The gaming industry, which includes
iGaming and sports betting, is heavily regulated and in order to continue our operations, we must maintain licenses and pay gaming
taxes or a percentage of revenue in each jurisdiction from which we operate. Our business is subject to extensive regulation
under the laws, rules and regulations of the jurisdictions from which we operate. These laws, rules and regulations generally
concern the responsibility, financial stability, integrity and character of the owners, managers and persons with material financial
interests in gaming operations, along with the integrity and security of our iGaming and sports betting offerings. Violations of
laws or regulations in one jurisdiction could result in disciplinary action in that and other jurisdictions.
Gaming laws are generally based
upon declarations of public policy designed to protect gaming consumers and the viability and integrity of the gaming industry.
Gaming laws also may be designed to protect and maximize state and local tax revenues, as well as to enhance economic development
and tourism. To accomplish these public policy goals, gaming laws establish stringent procedures to ensure that participants in
the gaming industry meet certain standards of character and responsibility. Among other things, gaming laws require gaming industry
participants to:
|
•
|
ensure that unsuitable individuals and organizations have no role in gaming operations;
|
|
•
|
establish procedures designed to prevent cheating and fraudulent practices;
|
|
•
|
establish and maintain anti-money laundering practices and procedures;
|
|
•
|
establish and maintain responsible accounting practices and procedures;
|
|
•
|
maintain effective controls over their financial practices, including establishing minimum procedures
for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues;
|
|
•
|
maintain systems for reliable record keeping;
|
|
•
|
file periodic reports with gaming regulators;
|
|
•
|
establish programs to promote responsible gaming; and
|
|
•
|
enforce minimum age requirements.
|
Typically, a
state regulatory environment is established by statute and underlying regulations and is administered by one or more regulatory
agencies (typically a gaming commission or state lottery) who regulate the affairs of owners, managers and persons with financial
interests in gaming operations. Among other things, gaming authorities in the various jurisdictions in which we conduct or intend
to conduct our business:
|
•
|
adopt rules and regulations under the implementing statutes;
|
|
•
|
interpret and enforce gaming laws and regulations;
|
|
•
|
impose fines and penalties for violations;
|
|
•
|
review the character and fitness of participants in gaming operations and make determinations regarding
their suitability or qualification for licensure;
|
|
•
|
grant licenses for participation in gaming operations;
|
|
•
|
collect and review reports and information submitted by participants in gaming operations;
|
|
•
|
review and approve certain transactions, which may include acquisitions or change-of-control transactions
of gaming industry participants and securities offerings and debt transactions in which such participants engage; and
|
|
•
|
establish and collect fees and taxes in jurisdictions where applicable.
|
While we believe
that we are in compliance in all material respects with all applicable iGaming and sports betting laws, licenses and regulatory
requirements, we cannot assure that our activities or the activities of our users will not become the subject of any regulatory
or law enforcement investigation, proceeding or other governmental action or that any such proceeding or action, as the case may
be, would not have a material adverse impact on us or our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Licensing and Suitability Determinations
In order to
operate in certain jurisdictions, we must obtain either a temporary or permanent license or determination of suitability from the
responsible authorities. We seek to ensure that we obtain all necessary licenses to develop and put forth our offerings in the
jurisdictions in which we operate and where our users are located.
Gaming laws
require us, and often each of our holding and intermediary companies as well as subsidiaries, certain of our directors, officers
and employees, and in some cases, certain of our shareholders, to obtain licenses from, or found suitable by, gaming authorities.
Licenses and suitability findings require a determination that the applicant is qualified. Where not mandated by statute, rule or
regulation, gaming authorities typically have broad discretion in determining who must apply for a license or finding of suitability
and whether an applicant qualifies for licensing or should be deemed suitable to conduct operations within a given jurisdiction.
When determining to grant a license to an applicant, gaming authorities generally consider: (i) the financial stability,
integrity, responsibility and suitability of the applicant and its applicable affiliated entities and individuals (including verification
of the applicant’s sources of funding); (ii) the quality and security of the applicant’s online real-money gaming
platform, hardware and related software, including the platform’s ability to operate in compliance with local regulation,
as applicable; (iii) the applicant’s history; (iv) the applicant’s ability to operate its gaming business
in a socially responsible manner; and (v) in certain circumstances, the effect on competition.
Gaming authorities
may, subject to certain administrative procedural requirements, (i) deny an application, or limit, condition, revoke or suspend
any license issued, or suitability finding made, by them; (ii) impose fines, either on a mandatory basis or as a consensual
settlement of regulatory action; (iii) demand that named individuals or shareholders be disassociated from a gaming business;
and (iv) in serious cases, liaise with local prosecutors to pursue legal action, which may result in civil or criminal penalties.
Events that
may trigger revocation of a gaming license or another form of sanction vary by jurisdiction. However, typical events include, among
others: (i) conviction in any jurisdiction of certain persons with an interest in, or key personnel of, the licensee of an
offense that is punishable by imprisonment or may otherwise cast doubt on such person’s integrity; (ii) failure to comply
with any material term or condition of the gaming license; (iii) declaration of, or otherwise engaging in, certain bankruptcy,
insolvency, winding-up or discontinuance activities, or an order or application with respect to the same; (iv) obtaining the
gaming license by a materially false or misleading representation or in some other improper way; (v) violation of applicable
anti-money laundering or terrorist financing laws or regulations; (vi) failure to meet commitments to users, including social
responsibility commitments; (vii) failure to pay in a timely manner all gaming or betting taxes or fees due; or (viii) determination
by the gaming authority that there is another material and sufficient reason to revoke or impose another form of sanction upon
the licensee.
As
noted above, in addition to us and our direct and indirect holding companies and subsidiaries, gaming authorities generally also
have the right to investigate individuals or entities having a material relationship to, or material involvement with, us or any of
our affiliates, to determine whether such individual or entity is suitable as a business associate. Specifically, as part of our
obtaining iGaming and sportsbook licenses, certain of our officers, directors, and employees and in some cases, certain of our
shareholders (typically, beneficial owners of more than 5% of a company’s outstanding equity, with most jurisdictions
providing that “institutional investors” (as defined by a particular jurisdiction) can seek a waiver of these
requirements) must file applications with the gaming authorities and may be required to be licensed or to qualify or be found
suitable in many jurisdictions. Qualification and suitability determinations generally require the submission of extensive and
detailed personal and financial disclosures followed by a thorough investigation. The applicant must pay all the costs of the
investigation. Changes with respect to the individuals who occupy licensed positions must be reported to gaming authorities and in
addition to the authority to deny an application for licensure, qualification, or a finding of suitability, gaming authorities have
jurisdiction to disapprove a change in a corporate position. If any director, officer, employee or significant shareholder is found
unsuitable (including due to the failure to submit required documentation) by a gaming authority, we may deem it necessary, or be
required, to sever our relationship with such person. Furthermore, the charter provides that any of our capital stock owned or controlled by an unsuitable person or its affiliates is transferred
to the Company or one or more third-party transferees, as and to the extent required by a gaming authority or deemed necessary or advisable
by the Board in its sole and absolute discretion.
Generally, any
person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within the prescribed period after being advised
that it is required by gaming authorities may be denied a license or found unsuitable, as applicable. Furthermore, we may be subject
to disciplinary action or our licenses may be in peril if, after we receive notice that a person is unsuitable to be a stockholder
or to have any other relationship with us or any of our subsidiaries, we: (i) pay that person any dividend or interest upon
our voting securities; (ii) allow that person to exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting right conferred through securities
held by that person; (iii) pay remuneration in any form to that person for services rendered or otherwise; or (iv) fail
to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish his voting securities.
iGaming.
We previously operated our iGaming platform in New Jersey pursuant to a transactional waiver order issued by the DGE.
We previously applied to the CCC for the issuance of a casino license as an Internet Gaming Affiliate of GNAC and for qualification
of the Company as a holding company of casino licensee GNOG. We also sought qualification as a financial source of GNAC in connection
with our business. On November 25, 2020, regulatory approvals were received in New Jersey for the issuance of a casino license
to GNOG as an Internet Gaming Affiliate of GNAC; the Company to act as a holding company of casino licensee GNOG; and, GNOG to
qualify as a financial source of GNAC. We are seeking regulatory approvals to be a “Qualified Gaming Entity” in Pennsylvania.
As a Qualified Gaming Entity, we would have the option, subject to regulatory approvals, to partner with competing online gaming
companies (“skins”) in a revenue share arrangement. We have also entered into an agreement with a Tribal casino in
Michigan, which allows us to conduct our iGaming operations under the Tribe’s license pursuant to a revenue share arrangement.
We have also recently executed similar agreements in Illinois and West Virginia. Generally, online gambling in the United States
is only lawful when specifically permitted under applicable state law. At the federal level, several laws provide federal law enforcement
with the authority to enforce and prosecute gambling operations conducted in violation of underlying state gambling laws. These
enforcement laws include the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (the “UIGEA”), the Illegal Gambling Business
Act and the Travel Act. No violation of the UIGEA, the Illegal Gambling Business Act or the Travel Act can be found absent a violation
of an underlying state law or other federal law. In addition, the Wire Act of 1961 (the “Wire Act”) provides that anyone
engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly uses a wire communication facility for the transmission in interstate
or foreign commerce of bets or wagers or information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers on any sporting event or contest,
or for the transmission of a wire communication which entitles the recipient to receive money or credit as a result of bets or
wagers, or for information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers, will be fined or imprisoned, or both. However, the Wire
Act notes that it shall not be construed to prevent the transmission in interstate or foreign commerce of information for use in
news reporting of sporting events or contests, or for the transmission of information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers
on a sporting event or contest from a State or foreign country where betting on that sporting event or contest is legal into a
State or foreign country in which such betting is legal. There is ongoing legal action as to whether the Wire Act applies beyond
sports betting. A federal court of first instance has ruled that it does not.
Sportsbook.
We previously operated our online sports betting platform in New Jersey pursuant to the transactional waiver order referenced
above. On November 25, 2020, we obtained regulatory approval in New Jersey for the issuance of a casino license to GNOG as
an Internet Gaming Affiliate of GNAC. Our agreement with a Tribal casino in Michigan and our market access agreements in Illinois
and West Virginia will also allow us to conduct future online sports betting operations in those states. On May 14, 2018,
the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion determining that the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 (“PASPA”)
was unconstitutional. PASPA prohibited a state from “authorizing by law” any form of sports betting. In striking down
PASPA, the Supreme Court opened the potential for state-by-state authorization of sports betting. Several states and territories,
including Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Washington, D.C. and West Virginia
already have laws authorizing and regulating some form of sports betting online or in brick- and-mortar establishments. Sports
betting in the United States is subject to additional laws, rules and regulations at the state level.
Data Protection
and Privacy
Because we handle,
collect, store, receive, transmit and otherwise process certain personal information of our users and employees, we are also subject
to federal, state and foreign laws related to the privacy and protection of such data. The regulatory framework for privacy issues
is rapidly evolving and is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future.
Competition
Given
that the U.S. online gaming market is vast and rapidly expanding, we believe any company competing for the time and disposable
income of customers within such market to be a competitor. Currently there are several online gaming companies in the U.S. that
provide iGaming, online sports betting, or both, including, but not limited to, DraftKings, FanDuel, Betfair, Caesars Entertainment,
BetMGM, Roar Digital, Penn National Gaming and Rush Street Interactive. We currently compete with FanDuel, DraftKings, Caesars
Entertainment, Roar Digital, Rush Street Interactive and Hard Rock, among others, in New Jersey and expect to compete with Rush
Street Interactive, FanDuel, DraftKings, PokerStars, Kindred and Penn National Gaming, among others, in Pennsylvania and FanDuel,
DraftKings, Roar Digital, Penn National Gaming and Rush Street Interactive, among others, in Michigan when it begins operations in
those states. Additionally, we expect competition from new entrants over time.
We believe the
principal competitive factors in the business include reliability, gaming offerings, the ability to acquire and retain users, regulatory
compliance, market access, brand equity, customer service, and innovation.
Employees
GNOG
has 178 employees. GNOG also occasionally relies on independent contractors to support GNOG’s operations. None of GNOG’s
employees are represented by a labor organization or are a party to any collective bargaining arrangement.
Responsible Gaming
We are committed to the welfare of our users and as such have made
available to them the industry-leading tools, systems, resources and processes they need to play responsibly.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our
business and investing in our securities involve significant risks, some of which are described below. Before you make a decision
to buy our securities, in addition to the risks and uncertainties discussed in the section titled “Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements,” you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all
of the other information contained in this Annual Report, including our financial statements and related notes
and in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
The occurrence of any of the events or developments described in the following risk factors and the risks described elsewhere in
this report could harm our business, financial condition, results
of operations, cash flows, the trading price of our common stock and our growth prospects. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. This report on Form 10-K
also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from
those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of factors that are described in the following risk factors and
the risks described elsewhere in this report.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Competition within the gaming industry is intense
and our existing and potential users may be attracted to our competitors’ offerings as well as competing forms of entertainment
such as television, movies, sporting events, and other online/digital experiences. If our offerings do not continue to be popular,
our business could be harmed.
We operate in the national gaming industry, itself a subsector of the
broader entertainment industry, with our business-to-consumer offerings, including iGaming and online sports betting. Our users face a
vast array of entertainment choices. Other forms of entertainment, such as television, movies, sporting events and land-based casinos,
are more well established and may be perceived by our users to offer a superior customer experience. We compete with these other forms
of entertainment for the discretionary time and income of our existing and potential users. If we are unable to sustain sufficient interest
in our product offerings in comparison to other forms of entertainment, including new forms of entertainment, our business may suffer.
The specific industries in which
we operate are characterized by dynamic customer demand and technological advances, and there is intense competition among online
gaming and interactive entertainment providers. Several established, well-financed companies producing online gaming and/or interactive
entertainment products and services compete with our offerings, and other well-capitalized companies may introduce competitive
services. Such competitors may spend more money and time on developing and testing products and services, undertake more extensive
marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing or promotional policies or otherwise develop more commercially successful products
or services than ours, which could negatively impact our business. Our competitors may also develop products, features, or services
that are similar to ours or that achieve greater market acceptance. Furthermore, new competitors, whether licensed or not, may
enter the online gaming industry. There has also been considerable consolidation among competitors in the entertainment and gaming
industries and such consolidation and future consolidation could result in the formation of larger competitors with increased financial
resources and altered cost structures, which may enable them to offer more competitive products, gain a larger market share, expand
offerings and broaden their geographic scope of operations. If we are not able to maintain or improve our market share, or if our
offerings lose popularity, our business could suffer.
The COVID-19 pandemic could adversely impact
our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The global spread and unprecedented
impact of COVID-19 are complex and evolving. The COVID-19 pandemic has led governments and other authorities around the world to
impose or recommend measures intended to control its spread, including travel bans, business and school closures, quarantines,
“stay-at-home” orders and implementation of other social distancing measures. We face several risks arising from the
COVID-19 pandemic, including with respect to macroeconomic impacts and well as the potential direct impact of the virus on our
employees and operations.
Suspensions,
postponements and cancellations of major sports seasons and sporting events during the COVID-19 pandemic have negatively impacted our
sports betting business. On the other hand, business closures or capacity limitations, stay-at-home orders and other measures imposed
in light of the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in a significant increase in our iGaming business, as our offering is well suited for
the current environment and consumers’ other options for leisure and entertainment are limited. Total iGaming revenues in New Jersey
2020 were $931.5 million, representing a 101.7% increase over the same period in 2019. If and when the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic
diminishes, or businesses are otherwise able to return to operations at or near pre-pandemic levels, we will face competition for consumers’
discretionary time and income from many more forms of entertainment that were unavailable, or available on a limited basis, during the
COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, our growth may slow as consumers, including those incremental players acquired during the pandemic, have
more choices for entertainment. Our accelerated growth during the first nine months of 2020 may not continue, and our results for such
period should not be considered a reliable indicator of our future results of operations.
The COVID-19 pandemic has also
caused substantial uncertainty about the strength of the U.S. economy, including a recession and high unemployment rates. If the
COVID-19 pandemic and economic consequences thereof, including high unemployment rates, persist for a prolonged period of time,
the resulting reductions in consumers’ disposable income could have an adverse effect on our business. We expect that the
longer the pandemic continues, and if repeat, resurgent or cyclical outbreaks of the virus continue to occur, the more likely it
is that the pandemic may have an adverse effect on our business and, consequently, our results of operations and financial condition.
Finally, if a high percentage
of our employees and/or a subset of our key employees and executives are infected or otherwise adversely impacted by COVID-19,
our ability to continue to operate effectively may be negatively impacted.
The extent of the duration and
severity of the COVID-19 pandemic remains uncertain, and we cannot predict the full impact it may have on our business, results
of operations and financial condition; however, the effect on our results could be material and adverse.
Economic downturns and adverse political and
market conditions beyond our control could adversely negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our financial
performance is subject to global and U.S. economic conditions and their impact on levels of spending by users, particularly discretionary
spending for entertainment, gaming and leisure activities. Economic recessions have had, and may continue to have, far reaching adverse
consequences across industries, including the global entertainment and gaming industries, which may adversely affect our business and
financial condition. As a result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, there is substantial uncertainty about the strength of the U.S. economy,
which may currently or in the near term be in a recession and has experienced rapid increases in unemployment rates and uncertainty about
the pace of potential recovery. A continued economic downturn or recession, or slowing or stalled recovery therefrom, may have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
In addition, changes in general
market, economic and political conditions in domestic and foreign economies or financial markets, including fluctuation in stock
markets resulting from, among other things, trends in the economy may reduce users’ disposable income. Any one of these changes
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
Reductions in discretionary consumer spending
could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Our business is particularly
sensitive to reductions in discretionary consumer spending. Demand for entertainment and leisure activities, including land-based
gaming and online gaming variants, can be affected by changes in the broader economy and consumer tastes, both of which are difficult
to predict and unmanageable. Adverse changes in general economic conditions, including recessions, economic slowdowns, sustained
high levels of unemployment, and rising prices or the perception by consumers of weak or weakening economic conditions, may reduce
our users’ disposable income or result in fewer individuals engaging in entertainment and leisure activities including iGaming
and online sports betting. As a result, we cannot ensure that demand for our offerings will remain constant. Adverse developments
affecting economies throughout the world, including a general tightening of availability of credit, decreased liquidity in financial
markets, increased interest rates, foreign exchange volatility, increased energy costs, acts of war or terrorism, transportation
disruptions, natural disasters, declining consumer confidence, sustained high levels of unemployment, significant declines in stock
markets, as well as concerns regarding pandemics, epidemics and the spread of contagious diseases, could lead to a further reduction
in discretionary spending on leisure activities, such as gaming.
For example, the COVID-19 pandemic
has negatively affected economic conditions in the U.S. as well as globally and has caused a reduction in consumer spending. As
of the date of this Annual Report, business closures or capacity limitations, stay-at-home orders and other measures imposed in
light of the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in a significant increase in our business, as our online offerings are well suited
for the current environment and consumers’ other options for leisure and entertainment are limited. Nonetheless, in ordinary
circumstances outside of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, any significant or prolonged decrease in consumer spending on entertainment
or leisure activities could adversely affect the demand for our offerings, reducing our cash flows and revenues, and thereby materially
harming our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We may experience fluctuations in our operating
results, which make our future results difficult to predict and may cause our operating results to fall below expectations.
Our financial results have fluctuated
in the past and we expect our financial results to fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations may be due to a variety of factors,
some of which are outside of our control and may not fully reflect the underlying performance of our business.
Our financial results in any
given period may be influenced by numerous factors, many of which we are unable to predict or are outside of our control, including
the impact of seasonality, customer betting results, and the other risks and uncertainties set forth herein. Consumer engagement
in our iGaming and online sports betting services may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including the user’s
level of satisfaction with our platforms, our ability to improve and innovate, our ability to adapt our platform, outages and disruptions
of online services, the services offered by our competitors, our marketing and advertising efforts or declines in consumer activity
generally as a result of economic downturns, among others. Any decline or fluctuation in the recurring portion of our business
may have a negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
In our
iGaming offering, operator losses can at times be limited per stake to a maximum payout, but there is content where the maximum win exposure
is uncapped due to features in the game that can potentially trigger more significant wins. When looking at bets across a period of time,
however, these losses can potentially be significant. Our financial results may also fluctuate based on whether we pay out any jackpots
to our iGaming users during the relevant period. As part of our iGaming offering, we offer progressive jackpot games. Each time a progressive
jackpot game is played, a portion of the amount wagered by the user is contributed to the jackpot for that specific game or group of
games. Once a jackpot is won, the progressive jackpot is reset with a predetermined base amount. While we maintain a provision for these
progressive jackpots, the cost of the progressive jackpot payout would be a cash outflow for our business in the period in which it is
won with a potentially significant adverse effect on our financial condition and cash flows. Because winning is underpinned by a random
algorithm, we cannot predict with absolute certainty when a progressive jackpot payout will be incurred. In addition, we do not insure
against random outcomes or jackpot wins.
The success, including win or hold rates, of
existing or future iGaming and sports betting products depends on a variety of factors and is not entirely in our control.
The iGaming and sports betting
industries are characterized by an element of chance. Accordingly, we employ theoretical win rates to estimate what a certain type
of iGaming or sports bet, on average, will win or lose after a significant number of iterations. Net win is impacted by variations
in the hold percentage (the ratio of net win to total amount wagered), or actual outcome, on our iGaming and sports betting
we offer to our users. We use the hold percentage as an indicator of an iGaming’s or sports bet’s performance
against its expected outcome. Although each iGaming or sports bet generally performs within a defined statistical range of outcomes,
actual outcomes may vary in accordance with statistical probability. In addition to the element of chance, win rates (hold percentages)
may also (depending on the game involved) be affected by the spread of limits and factors that are beyond our control, such as
a user’s skill, experience and behavior, the mix of games played, the financial resources of users, the volume of bets placed
and the amount of time spent gambling. As a result of the variability in these factors, the actual win rates for our iGaming offerings
and sports betting wagers may differ materially from theoretical win rates we have estimated and could result in the winnings exceeding
our expectations based on statistical law. The variability of win rates (hold rates) also have the potential to negatively impact
our financial condition, cash flow and overall business operations.
Our success also depends in
part on our ability to anticipate and satisfy user preferences in a timely and effective manner. As we operate in a dynamic industry
characterized by rapidly evolving legal standards and regulations, the scope of our potential product offerings is subject to rapid
change, and as such our offerings will be subject to dynamic consumer preferences and expectations around said offerings that cannot
be predicted with certainty. We need to continually introduce new offerings and identify future offerings that complement our existing
platforms, respond to our users’ needs and improve and enhance our existing platforms to maintain or increase our user engagement
and growth of our business.
Our projections are subject to significant
risks, assumptions, estimates and uncertainties, including assumptions regarding future legislation and changes in regulations.
As a result, our projected revenues, market share, expenses and profitability may differ materially from our expectations.
We operate in a rapidly evolving
and highly competitive industry and our projections are subject to the risks and assumptions made by management with respect to
this industry. Operating results are difficult to forecast because they generally depend on our assessment of factors that are
inherently beyond our control and impossible to predict with certainty, such as the timing of adoption of future legislation and
regulations by different states. Furthermore, if we invest in the development of new products or distribution channels that do
not achieve commercial success, whether because of competition or otherwise, it may not recover the often material “up front”
costs of developing and marketing those products and distribution channels or recover the opportunity cost of diverting management
and financial resources away from other products or distribution channels.
Additionally, as described above
under “— Reductions in discretionary consumer spending could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects,” our business may be affected by reductions in consumer spending as a result numerous
factors which may be difficult to predict. This may result in decreased revenue levels, and we may be unable to adopt timely measures
to compensate for any shortcomings in revenue and/or operating profitability. This inability could cause our operating results
in a given period to be higher or lower than budgeted.
Our growth prospects may suffer if we are unable
to develop successful offerings or if we fail to pursue additional offerings. In addition, if we fail to make the right investment
decisions in our offerings and technology platform, we may not attract and retain key users and our revenue and results of operations
may decline.
The industries in which we operate
are subject to frequent changes in standards, technologies, products and service offerings, as well as in customer demands, preferences
and regulations. We must continuously make decisions regarding which offerings and technology to invest in to meet customer demand
in compliance with evolving industry standards and regulatory requirements and must continually introduce and successfully market
new and innovative technologies, offerings and enhancements to remain competitive and effectively stimulate customer demand, acceptance
and engagement. Our ability to engage, retain, and increase our user base and to increase our revenue depends heavily on our ability
to successfully implement new offerings, both independently and jointly with third parties. We may introduce significant changes
to our existing platforms and offerings or develop and introduce new and unproven products, with which we have little or no prior
development or operating experience. The process of developing new offerings and systems is inherently complex and uncertain, and
new offerings may not be well received by users, even if well reviewed and of high quality. If we are unable to develop technology
and products that address users’ needs or enhance and improve our existing platforms and offerings in a timely manner, that
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
Although we intend to continue
investing in innovative content and systems, if new or enhanced offerings fail to engage our users or partners, we may fail to
attract or retain users or to generate sufficient revenue, operating margin, or other value to justify our investments, any of
which may seriously harm our business. In addition, management may not properly ascertain or assess the risks of new initiatives,
and subsequent events may alter the risks that we evaluated at the time we decided to execute any new initiative. Developing new
offerings may also divert our management’s attention from other business issues and opportunities. Even if our new offerings
attain market acceptance, those new offerings could cannibalize the market share of our existing product offerings or share of
our users’ wallets in a manner that could negatively impact their economics. Furthermore, such expansion of our business
may increase the complexity of our business and place a significant strain on our management, operations, technical systems and
financial resources and we may not recover the often-substantial up-front costs of developing and marketing new offerings or recover
the opportunity cost of diverting management and financial resources away from other offerings. In the event of continued growth
of our operations, products or in the number of third-party relationships, we may not have adequate resources, operationally, technologically
or otherwise to support such growth and the quality of our existing platforms, offerings or relationships with third parties. Conversely,
failure to effectively identify, pursue and execute new offerings, or to efficiently adapt our processes and infrastructure to
meet the needs of our innovations, may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
Any new offerings may also require
our users to learn new skills to use our platform. This could create friction in the adoption of new offerings and new user additions
related to any new offerings. To date, new offerings and enhancements on our existing platforms have not hindered our user growth
or engagement. To the extent that future users are less willing to invest the time to learn to use our products, and if we are
unable to make our products easier to learn to use, our user growth or engagement could be affected, and our business could be
harmed. We may develop new products that increase user engagement and costs without increasing revenue.
Additionally, we may make poor
or unprofitable decisions regarding these investments. If new or existing competitors offer more attractive offerings, we may lose
users or users may decrease their spending on our platforms. New customer preferences, superior competitive offerings, new industry
standards or changes in the regulatory environment could render our existing offerings unattractive, unmarketable or obsolete and
require us to make substantial unanticipated changes to our platforms or business model. Our failure to adapt to a rapidly changing
market or evolving customer demands could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
Our growth inherently depends on our ability
to attract and retain users, and the loss of our users, failure to attract new users in a cost-effective manner, or failure to
effectively manage our growth could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
Our ability to achieve growth
in revenue in the future will depend, in large part, upon our ability to attract new users to our offerings, retain existing users
of our offerings and reactivate users in a cost-effective manner. Achieving growth in our database of users may require us to engage
in increasingly costly sales and marketing efforts, which may impact our return on investment. We have used and expect to continue
to use a variety of free and paid marketing channels, in combination with compelling offers and exciting games to achieve our objectives.
For paid marketing, we intend to leverage a broad array of advertising channels. If the search engines on which we rely modify
their algorithms, change their terms around gaming, or if the prices at which we may purchase listings increase, then our costs
could increase, and fewer users may visit our website. If links to our website are not displayed prominently in online search results,
if fewer users visit our website, if our other digital marketing campaigns are not effective, or if the costs of attracting users
using any of our current methods significantly increase, then our ability to efficiently attract new users could be reduced, our
revenue could decline and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.
In addition, our ability to
increase the number of users of our offerings will depend on continued user adoption of iGaming and online sports betting. Growth
in the iGaming and online sports betting industries and the level of demand for and market acceptance of our product offerings
will be subject to a high degree of uncertainty. We cannot assure that consumer adoption of our product offerings will continue
or exceed current growth rates, or that the industry will achieve more widespread acceptance.
Additionally, as technological
or regulatory standards change and we modify our platform to comply with those standards, we may need users to take certain actions
to continue accessing our offerings, such as performing age verification checks or accepting new terms and conditions. Users may
stop using our product offerings if the quality of the user experience on our platform, including age checks, terms and conditions
acceptance, and support capabilities in the event of a problem, does not meet their expectations or keep pace with the quality
of the customer experience generally offered by competitive offerings.
We may require additional capital
to support our growth initiatives, and such capital may not be available on economically favorable terms, if at all. This
could hamper our growth and adversely affect our business.
We
intend to make significant investments to support our growth in the entertainment and gaming industries and may require additional
capital to address business challenges, including the need to expand to new markets, develop new offerings and features or enhance
our existing platforms, improve our operating infrastructure or acquire complementary businesses, personnel and technologies.
Accordingly, we may need to engage in additional equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. Our ability to obtain
additional capital when required will depend on our business plans, investor demand, our operating performance, capital markets
conditions and other variables, some of which are uncertain. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity, equity-linked or debt
securities, those securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to the rights of our currently issued and outstanding
equity, and our existing stockholders may experience dilution. If we are unable to obtain additional capital when required, or on
satisfactory terms, our ability to continue to support our business growth or to respond to business opportunities, challenges or
unforeseen circumstances could be adversely affected, and our business may be harmed.
Risks Relating to our Information Technology
We rely on information technology and other
systems and platforms, and any failures, errors, defects or disruptions in such systems or platforms could diminish our brand and
reputation, subject us to liability, disrupt our business, affect our ability to scale our technical infrastructure and adversely
affect our operating results and growth prospects. Our online gaming offerings, software applications and systems, and the third-party
platforms upon which they are made available could contain undetected errors.
Our technology infrastructure
is provided by third party providers critical to the performance of our platform and offerings. For example, our back-end platform,
which is critical to the performance of our platform and offering, is provided by NYX Digital Gaming (USA), LLC (“NYX”),
a subsidiary of Scientific Games Corporation. Our agreement with NYX provides for an initial four-year term for each state in which
GNOG LLC conducts business, subject to optional one-year renewals thereafter unless either party elects to otherwise terminate.
We pay NYX a fee based on a percentage of net gaming revenue, plus certain fixed costs. Further, technology provided by Ezugi
NJ LLC (“Ezugi”), an affiliate of Evolution Malta Limited (“Evolution”), is critical to the performance
of our Live Dealer offering. Our agreement with Ezugi provides for a term through August 2021, and upon expiration, we have
an agreement with Evolution to continue to obtain Live Dealer technology for an additional five years thereafter. Under both
the Ezugi and Evolution agreements, we pay a fee based on a percentage of net gaming revenue generated by our own offering
and, in some instances, generated by third parties utilizing our live studio, plus certain fixed costs. These third party providers’
systems may not be adequately designed with the necessary reliability and redundancy to avoid performance delays or outages that
could be detrimental to our business.
The third parties on which we rely provide resources for network and
data security to protect our systems and data. We cannot assure with certainty that the measures we and such third parties take to prevent
or reduce the likelihood of cyber-attacks, protect their systems, data and user information, to prevent outages, to prevent data or information
loss and fraud, and to prevent or detect security breaches, will provide absolute security. We have experienced, and we may in the future
experience, website disruptions, outages and other performance problems resulting from a variety of factors, including internet and application
connection issues, infrastructure failure and changes, human or software errors and capacity constraints. Such disruptions have not had
a material impact on us to date; however, future disruptions from unauthorized access to, fraudulent manipulation of, or tampering with
our computer systems and technological infrastructure, or those of third parties, could result in a wide range of negative outcomes, each
of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
Some of our third party platforms
and systems are not fully redundant, and disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all eventualities. Ours and our third-party
service providers’ disaster recovery do not offer full offsite failover recovery, which could result in our operations and
offerings being offline for a period of time to sufficiently recover any impacted third-party infrastructure and recover the latest
available data, as well as any time required to receive the required regulatory approvals.
We own and operate our
live dealer studio connectivity and technical infrastructure; however, the data center and key services such as security and
access, surveillance, network and connectivity, electricity and cooling are provided by third parties. These third-party
providers have experienced issues in the past and any such issues in the future could have a material impact on our ability
to provide live dealer services to our and our partner customers. Any such material impact could result in a material effect
to our revenues and partner customer confidence in our ability to provide reliable live dealer services. Any such loss of
partner customer confidence could result in such partner customers moving to competitor live dealer services and studios. We
rely on facilities, components, and services supplied by third parties, including data center facilities and cloud storage
services. If these third parties cease to provide the facilities or services, experience operational interference or
disruptions, breach their agreements with us, fail to perform their obligations and meet our expectations, or experience a
cybersecurity incident, our operations could be disrupted or otherwise negatively affected. Any such disruption or negative
impact could result in an extensive interruption in our operations and damage to our reputation and brand, materially and
adversely affecting our business. We do not carry business interruption insurance sufficient to compensate us for all losses
that may result from interruptions in our service as a result of systems failures and other events.
Additionally, our offerings
may contain errors, bugs, flaws or corrupted data, and these defects may only become apparent after their launch. If a particular
offering is unavailable when users attempt to access it, or navigation through our platforms is slower than they expect, users
may be unable to place their iGaming or sports betting wagers in time and may be less likely to return to our platforms as frequently,
if at all. Furthermore, programming errors, defects and data corruption could disrupt our operations, adversely affect the experience
of our users, harm our brand perception, cause our users to stop utilizing our platforms, divert our resources and delay market
acceptance of our offerings, any of which could result in legal liability to us or harm our business, financial condition, results
of operations and business prospects.
If our user base and engagement
continue to grow, and the amount and types of offerings continue to grow and evolve, we will need to allocate an increasing amount
of technical infrastructure, including network capacity and computing power, to continue to satisfy our users’ needs. Such
infrastructure expansion may be complex, and unanticipated delays in completing expansion projects may lead to increased project
costs, operational inefficiencies, or interruptions in the delivery or degradation of the quality of our offerings. In addition,
there may be issues related to this infrastructure that are not detected during the testing phases of design and implementation,
which may only become evident after we have started to fully use the underlying equipment or software, that could further degrade
the user experience or increase our costs. As such, we could fail to continue to effectively scale and grow our technical infrastructure
to accommodate increased demands.
We believe that if our users
have a negative experience with our offerings, or if our brand or reputation is negatively affected, users may be less inclined
to continue utilizing our products or recommend our platform to other potential users. As such, a failure or significant interruption
in our service would harm our brand’s reputation, business prospects and operating results.
Despite our security measures,
our information technology and infrastructure is vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breaches resulting from employee error, malfeasance
or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly
disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings,
liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, and regulatory penalties, disruption of our operations and
the services we provide to users, damage to our reputation, and a loss of confidence in our products and services, which could
adversely affect our business.
The secure maintenance and transmission
of user information is a critical element of our operations. Our information technology and other systems that maintain and transmit
user information, or those of our service providers or our business partners have been in the past, and may in the future be, compromised
by a malicious third-party penetration of our network security, or impacted by intentional or unintentional actions or inactions
by our employees, or employees of our third-party service providers or our business partners. As a result, our users’ information
may be lost, disclosed, accessed or taken without our guests’ consent.
The regulatory framework for
the privacy and data security of our user information and employee information is rapidly evolving and is likely to remain uncertain
for the foreseeable future. Many federal, state and foreign government bodies and agencies, and industry associations, have adopted
or are considering adopting laws, rules, regulations and standards regarding the collection, use, disclosure and security of personal
information. In the United States, these include rules and regulations promulgated under the authority of the federal and
state labor and employment laws, state data breach notification laws, state data security laws and state privacy laws. Our failure
to comply with data security and privacy laws, rules, regulations and standards could result in regulatory scrutiny and increased
exposure to the risk of litigation, contractual liability, or the imposition of consent orders or civil and criminal fines, penalties
and assessments, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. Moreover, allegations
of non-compliance with privacy regulations, whether or not true, could be costly, time consuming, distracting to our management,
and cause reputational harm.
We rely on encryption and authentication
technology licensed from third parties designed to securely transmit confidential and sensitive information, including credit card
numbers, in an attempt to reduce the probability of breaches. Advances in computing capabilities, new technological discoveries
or other developments may result in whole or partial failure of this technology protecting transaction data or other confidential
and sensitive information from being breached or compromised. In addition, websites are often attacked through compromised credentials,
including those obtained through phishing and credential stuffing. Our security measures, and those of our third-party service
providers, may not detect or prevent all attempts to breach our systems, denial-of-service attacks, viruses, malicious software,
break-ins, phishing attacks, social engineering, security breaches or other attacks and similar disruptions that may jeopardize
the security of information stored in or transmitted by our websites, networks and systems that we or such third parties otherwise
maintain. A security breach of our or our service providers’ payment card systems may subject us to fines or higher transaction
fees or limit or terminate our access to certain payment methods. We and our third-party service providers may not anticipate or
prevent all types of attacks until after they have already been launched. Further, techniques used to obtain unauthorized access
to or sabotage systems change frequently and may not be known until launched against us or our third-party service providers.
In addition, security breaches
can also occur from non-technical issues, including intentional or inadvertent breaches by our employees or third parties. The
risks of these security breaches may increase over time as we scale the business and the complexity and number of technical systems
and applications we use increases. Breaches of our security measures or those of our third-party service providers could result
in unauthorized access to our sites, networks and systems; unauthorized access to and misappropriation of user information, including
users’ personally identifiable information, or other confidential or proprietary information of us or third parties; viruses,
worms, spyware or other malware being served from our sites, networks or systems; deletion or modification of content or the display
of unauthorized content on our sites; interruption, disruption or malfunction of operations; costs relating to breach remediation,
deployment of additional personnel and protection technologies, response to governmental investigations and media inquiries and
coverage; engagement of third-party experts and consultants; litigation, regulatory action and other potential liabilities.
In the past, we and our third-party
service providers have experienced social engineering, phishing, malware, threatened denial-of-service and similar attacks, none
of which to date has been material to our business; however, such attacks could in the future have a material adverse effect on
our operations and third-party service providers. If a future breach of security should occur and be material, our brand’s
reputation could be damaged, our business may suffer, we could be required to expend significant capital and other resources to
alleviate problems caused by said breaches, and we could be exposed to a risk of loss, litigation or regulatory action and possible
liability. We cannot guarantee that we or our third-party service providers’ protocols and backup systems will be sufficient
to prevent data loss. Actual or anticipated attacks may cause us to incur increasing costs, including costs to deploy additional
personnel and protection technologies, train employees and engage third-party experts and consultants.
A party who manages to illicitly
obtain a user’s account information could access the user’s transaction data or personal information, resulting in
the perception that our systems are insecure. Any compromise or breach of our security measures, or those of our third-party service
providers, could violate applicable privacy, data protection, data security, network and information systems security and other
laws and cause significant legal and financial exposure, adverse publicity and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. We may
need in the future to address problems caused by breaches, including notifying affected users and responding to any resulting litigation,
which in turn, diverts resources from the growth and expansion of our business.
Our platform contains third-party open source software components,
and failure to comply with the terms of the underlying open source software licenses could restrict our ability to provide our offerings.
Our internal and third-party platforms contain software modules licensed
to us by third-party authors under “open source” licenses. Use and distribution of open source software may entail greater
risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide support, warranties, indemnification
or other contractual protections regarding infringement claims or the quality of the code. In addition, the public availability of such
software may make it easier for others to compromise our platform.
Some open source licenses contain requirements
that we and our third-party providers make available source code for modifications or derivative works we and our third-party providers
create, or that we or our third-party providers grant other licenses to their proprietary software, based upon the type of open source
software we and our third-party providers use. If we comingle any in-house software with open source software in a certain manner, we
and our third-party providers could, under certain open source licenses, be required to release their proprietary source code to the public.
This would enable our competitors to create similar offerings at a lower economic cost and ultimately could result in a loss of our competitive
advantages. Alternatively, to avoid the public release of the affected portions of our source code, we could be required to expend substantial
time and resources to reengineer some or all of our software.
Although we monitor our use of open source software to avoid subjecting
our platform to conditions we do not intend, the terms of many open source licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. or foreign courts,
and there is a risk that these licenses could be construed in a way that could impose unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our
ability to provide or distribute our platform. In the past there have been claims challenging the ownership of open source software against
companies that incorporate open source software into their solutions. As such, we could be subject to lawsuits by parties claiming infringement
of intellectual property rights in what we believe to be open source software. Moreover, we cannot assure that our processes for controlling
the use of open source software in our platform will be effective. If we are determined to have breached or failed to fully comply with
all the terms and conditions of an open source software license, we could face infringement or other liability, or be required to seek
costly licenses from third parties to continue providing our offerings on terms that are not economically feasible, to reengineer our
platform, to discontinue or delay the provision of our offerings if reengineering could not be accomplished on a timely basis or to make
generally available, proprietary source code, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may incur significant costs in order to
comply with software and app store guidelines and requirements. Non-compliance with such guidelines and requirements could limit
our ability to distribute our apps and, consequently, could have an adverse effect on our revenues.
Microsoft, Apple, Google and
other software and distribution providers that we use to distribute our apps and services continue to update their software development
kits and app store guidelines. Our failure to comply with such guidelines and requirements could result in us being refused or
restricted access to critical distribution channels. As an example, Apple recently released updated app store and software development
guidelines that require all real money gaming apps to comply with Apple’s native user interface requirements and content
delivery mechanisms. Such updates require a fundamental change to the way all real money gaming operators develop and manage their
app front ends and content. Further, updates and changes to software and app store guidelines and requirements may require us and
our third-party providers to invest significant time and resources to redevelop solutions, which may result in significant costs
for us. These changes can also limit the functionality of the user interface, competitive differentiation of the product and availability
of content, which can have a material impact on our business and revenues. App stores are a critical distribution channel for our
customers to download and access our software and services. At any time, an app store provider could decline an app submission
or remove an app due to non-compliance with our software development kit requirements and store guidelines, which could result
in a material adverse impact on our ability to distribute our apps and, consequently, a material adverse effect on our revenues.
If we fail to detect fraud or
theft, including by our users and employees, our brand’s reputation may suffer which could negatively impact our business,
financial condition and results of operations and can subject us to investigations and litigation.
We have in the past incurred,
and may in the future incur, losses from various types of financial fraud, including use of stolen or fraudulent credit card data,
claims of unauthorized payments by a user and attempted payments by users with insufficient funds. Bad actors use increasingly
sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities involving sensitive financial information, such as unauthorized use of another
person’s identity, account information or payment information and unauthorized acquisition or use of credit or debit card
details, bank account information and mobile phone numbers and accounts. Under current credit card practices, we may be liable
for use of funds on our platform with fraudulent credit card data, even if the associated financial institution approved the credit
card transaction.
Acts of fraud may involve
various tactics, including collusion. Successful exploitation of our systems could have negative effects on our product
offerings, services and user experience and could harm our brand’s reputation. Failure to uncover such bad actors could
result in harm to our operations. In addition, negative publicity related to breaches of this nature could have an adverse
effect on our brand’s reputation, potentially causing a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and business prospects. In the event of the occurrence of any such issues with our existing platform or
product offerings, substantial engineering and marketing resources and management attention, may be diverted from other
projects to correct these issues, which may delay other projects and the achievement of our strategic objectives. Despite
measures we have taken to detect and reduce the occurrence of fraudulent or other malicious activity on our platform, we
cannot say with certainty that any of our measures will be effective. Our failure to adequately detect or prevent fraudulent
transactions could harm our brand’s reputation, result in litigation or regulatory action and lead to expenses that
could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Relating to our Reliance on Third Parties
and Affiliates
Our business is dependent on agreements with
certain of our affiliates, and our failure to comply with the terms of such agreements, or failure to maintain our relationship
with Golden Nugget and its affiliates, may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and
financial condition.
Our right to host, manage, control,
operate, support and administer the Golden Nugget-branded online gaming business in New Jersey and the third-party operators is
governed by the A&R Online Gaming Operations Agreement between GNOG LLC and Golden Nugget Atlantic City, LLC, a New Jersey
limited liability company, which is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Fertitta Entertainment, Inc. (“GNAC”).
We operate our online gaming business under GNAC’s land-based casino operating licenses. There are certain circumstances
under which the A&R Online Gaming Operations Agreement may be terminated in its entirety, including in the event of a party’s
material breach thereof or in the event of a change in law or adverse regulatory action that prevents the operation of the online
gaming business. Termination of the A&R Online Gaming Operations Agreement would eliminate our ability to operate our online
gaming and sport betting business in New Jersey, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations,
cash flows and financial condition.
To date,
all of GNOG LLC’s business has been conducted under the Golden Nugget brand. Our ability to use the Golden Nugget brand is governed
by the Trademark License Agreement among GNOG LLC, Golden Nugget, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, which is an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of Fertitta Entertainment, Inc. (“Golden Nugget”) and GNLV, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, which
is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Golden Nugget (“GNLV”). Pursuant to the Trademark License Agreement, GNLV granted
to GNOG LLC an exclusive license to use certain Golden Nugget trademarks in connection with operating iGaming and online sports wagering
in the U.S., subject to certain restrictions, and GNOG LLC has agreed to pay Golden Nugget a monthly royalty payment equal to 3% of net
gaming revenue for a term of 20 years from the Closing Date. There is no guarantee that we will thereafter be able to renew or replace
the Trademark License Agreement on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In addition, there are certain circumstances under which
the Trademark License Agreement may be terminated in its entirety (subject to applicable cure periods). Termination of the Trademark
License Agreement would eliminate our rights to use the Golden Nugget brand and may result in us having to negotiate a new or reinstated
agreement with less favorable terms or cause us to lose its rights under the Trademark License Agreement, including its right to use
the Golden Nugget brand, which would require us to change its corporate name and undergo other significant rebranding efforts. These
rebranding efforts may require significant resources and expenses and may affect our ability to attract and retain customers, all of
which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects.
GNAC and Golden Nugget also
provide certain services and facilities, including payroll, accounting, financial planning and other agreed upon services, to us
from time to time pursuant to a Services Agreement. We are obligated to reimburse the party providing the service or facilities
at cost. The Services Agreement may be terminated with respect to any party upon six months’ prior written notice. If
the Services Agreement is terminated, we will have to contract with another third party to provide such services or hire employees
to perform them. We may not be able to replace these services or hire such employees in a timely manner or on terms, including
cost and level of expertise, that are as favorable as those we receive from GNAC and Golden Nugget.
We rely on strategic relationships with casinos
and other gaming operators to offer our products in certain jurisdictions. If we cannot establish and manage such relationships
with these partners, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Under some states’ gaming
laws, online betting is limited to a finite number of retail operators, who own a “skin” or “skins” under
that state’s law. A “skin” is a legally-authorized license from a state to offer online betting services provided
by a casino. The “skin” provides a market access opportunity for mobile operators to operate in the jurisdiction subject
to the appropriate licensure and other required approvals from the appropriate regulatory body. The entities that control those
“skins,” and the numbers of “skins” available, are typically determined by state betting laws. In order
to offer iGaming and online sports betting in Michigan, we currently intend to rely on a tribal casino in order to get access through
a “skin.” We have also recently executed similar agreements in Illinois and West Virginia. A “skin” is
what allows us to gain access to a jurisdiction where online operators are required to have a retail relationship. If we cannot
establish, renew or manage our relationships, as it pertains to Michigan, Illinois and West Virginia or any other states we
enter in the future, our relationships could be terminated, and we would not be allowed to operate in those jurisdictions until
we enter into new relationships, which could be at significantly higher cost. As a result, our business, financial condition and
results of operations could be adversely affected.
We rely on third-party providers to validate
the identity and location of our users, and if such providers fail to accurately confirm user information or we do not maintain
business relationships with them, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We cannot guarantee that the
third-party geolocation and identity verification systems that we rely on will perform effectively. We rely on these geolocation
and identity verification systems to ensure we follow certain laws and regulations, and any service disruption to those systems
would prohibit us from operating our platform and would adversely affect our business. Additionally, incorrect or misleading geolocation
and identity verification data with respect to current or potential users received from third-party service providers may result
in us inadvertently allowing access to our offerings to individuals who are not permitted to access them, or otherwise inadvertently
denying access to individuals who are permitted access them, in each case, based on inaccurate identity or geographic location
determination. Our third-party geolocation services provider relies on our ability to obtain information necessary to determine
geolocation from mobile devices, operating systems, and other sources. Changes, disruptions or temporary or permanent failure to
access such sources by our third-party service providers may result in their inability to accurately determine the location of
our users. Moreover, failure to maintain our existing contracts with third-party service providers, or to replace them with equivalent
third parties, may result in our inability to access geolocation and identity verification data necessary for our operations. If
any of these risks materialize, we may be subject to disciplinary action, fines, lawsuits, and our business, financial condition
and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We rely on third-party payment processors to
process deposits and withdrawals made by customers on our platform, and if we cannot manage our relationships with such third parties
and other payment-related risks, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We rely on a limited number
of third-party payment processors to process deposits and withdrawals made by customers on our platform. If any of our third-party
payment processors terminates its relationship with us or refuses to renew its agreement with us on economically reasonable terms,
we would be forced to find an alternative payment processor, and may not be able to secure favorable terms or replace such payment
processor in a timely manner. Further, the software and services provided by our third-party payment processors may not meet our
expectations or may contain errors or other defects, be compromised or experience outages. Any of these could cause us to lose
our ability to accept online payments or other payment transactions or make timely payments to users on our platform, any of which
could make our platform less well perceived by the market and adversely affect our ability to attract and retain our users.
Nearly all of our payments are
made by credit card, debit card or through other third-party payment services, which subjects us to certain regulations, contractual
obligations and to the risk of fraud. We may in the future offer new payment options to users that may be subject to additional
regulations and risks. We are also subject to a number of other laws, regulations and contractual obligations relating to the payments
we accept from our users, including with respect to money laundering, money transfers, privacy and information security. If we
fail to comply with applicable rules and regulations, we may be subject to civil or criminal penalties, fines and/or higher
transaction fees and may lose our ability to accept online payments or other payment card transactions, which could make our platform
less well perceived by our users. If any of these events were to occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be adversely affected.
For example, if we are deemed
to be a money transmitter as defined by applicable regulation, we could be subject to certain laws, rules and regulations
enforced by multiple authorities and governing bodies in the U.S. and numerous state and local agencies who may define money transmitter
differently. Certain states may have a more expansive view of who qualifies as a money transmitter. If we are found to be a money
transmitter under any applicable regulation and we are not in compliance with such regulations, we may be subject to fines or other
penalties in one or more jurisdictions levied by federal or state or local regulators, including state Attorneys General, as well
as those levied by foreign regulators. Penalties for failing to comply with applicable rules and regulations could include
criminal and civil proceedings, forfeiture of material assets or other enforcement actions. We could also be required to make changes
to our business practices or compliance programs as a result of regulatory scrutiny.
Additionally, our payment processors
require us to comply with payment card network operating rules, which are set and interpreted by payment card networks. The payment
card networks could adopt new operating rules or interpret or reinterpret existing rules in ways that might prohibit
us from providing certain offerings to particular users, be costly to implement or difficult to follow. We have agreed to reimburse
our payment processors for fines they are assessed by payment card networks if we or the users on our platform violate these rules.
Any of the foregoing risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on other third-party service providers
and if such third parties do not perform adequately or terminate their relationships with us, our costs may increase and our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We rely heavily on our relationships
with third-party information technology service providers. For example, we rely on third parties for online connectivity, infrastructure
hosting, technical infrastructure, network management, content delivery, load balancing and protection against hacking and distributed
denial-of-service attacks. If those providers do not perform adequately, our users may experience errors or disruptions in operations
and services. Furthermore, if any of our partners terminates their relationship with us or refuse to renew their agreement with
us on commercially reasonable terms, we could be forced to find an alternative provider and may not be able to secure similar terms
in a timely manner. We also rely on other software and services supplied by third parties, such as communications and internal
software, and our business may be adversely affected to the extent such software and services do not meet our expectations, contain
errors or vulnerabilities, are compromised or experience outages. Any of these risks could increase our costs and adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, any negative publicity related to any of our third-party
partners, including any publicity related to regulatory concerns, could adversely affect our brand’s reputation and could
potentially lead to increased regulatory or litigation exposure.
We incorporate technology from
third parties into our platform. We cannot be certain that our licensors are not infringing the intellectual property rights of
others or that the suppliers and licensors have sufficient rights to the technology in all jurisdictions in which we may operate.
Some of our license agreements may be terminated by our licensors at their determination. If we are unable to obtain or maintain
rights to any of this technology because of intellectual property infringement claims brought by third parties against our suppliers
and licensors or against us, or if we are unable to continue to obtain the technology or enter into new agreements on commercially
reasonable terms, our ability to develop our platform containing that technology could be severely limited and our business could
be harmed.
Additionally, if we are unable
to obtain necessary technology from third parties, we may be forced to acquire or develop or own services which could be economically
costly and negatively impact our operations. If alternative technology cannot be obtained or developed, we may not be able to offer
certain functionality as part of our offerings, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is dependent on internet and other
technology-based service providers, if these parties experience business interruptions, our ability to conduct business may be
impaired and our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
A substantial portion of our
network infrastructure is provided by third parties, including internet service providers and other technology-based service providers.
We require technology-based service providers to maintain adequate cyber security systems and processes. However, if these service
providers experience service interruptions, including those due to cyber-attacks, or those due to an event causing an unusually
high volume of Internet use (such as a pandemic or public health emergency), communications over the Internet may be interrupted
and impair our ability to conduct our business. Internet service providers and other technology-based service providers may in
the future roll out upgraded or new mobile or other telecommunications services, such as 5G or 6G services, which may impact the
ability of our users to access our platform or offerings in a timely fashion or at all. Any difficulties these providers face,
including the potential of certain network traffic receiving priority over other traffic (i.e., lack of net neutrality), may adversely
affect our business, and we exercise little influence over these providers, which increases our vulnerability to problems with
their services. Furthermore, our ability to process digital transactions depends on bank processing and credit card systems. To
prepare for system malfunctions, we continuously seek to improve our facilities and the capabilities of our system infrastructure
and support. Nevertheless, there can be no guarantee that the internet infrastructure or our own network systems will be able to
meet the demand placed on them by the continued growth of the internet, the overall online gaming industry and our users. Any system
failure as a result of reliance on these third parties, such as network, software or hardware failure, including as a result of
cyber-attacks, which causes a loss of our users’ property or personal information or a delay or interruption in our online
services and products could result in a loss of anticipated revenue, interruptions to our platform and offerings, cause us to incur
significant legal, remediation and notification costs, degrade the customer experience and cause users to lose confidence in our
offerings, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and business
prospects.
We
rely on licenses to use the intellectual property rights of third parties, which are incorporated into our products and services.
Failure to renew or expand existing licenses may require us to modify, limit or discontinue certain offerings, which could materially
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on products, technologies
and intellectual property that we license from third parties, for use in our business-to-business and business-to-consumers offerings.
Substantially all of our offerings and services use intellectual property licensed from third parties. The future success of our
business may depend, in part, on our ability to obtain, retain and expand licenses for popular technologies and games in a competitive
market. We cannot assure that these third-party licenses, or support for such licensed products and technologies, will continue
to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In the event that we cannot renew and expand existing licenses,
we may be required to discontinue or limit our use of the products that include or incorporate the licensed intellectual property.
Some of our license agreements
contain minimum guaranteed royalty payments to the third-party licensor. If we are unable to generate sufficient revenue to offset
the minimum guaranteed royalty payments, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition. Our license agreements generally allow for assignment by us in the event of a strategic transaction but some contain
limited termination rights in the event of an attempted assignment by us. Certain of our license agreements grant the licensor
rights to audit our use of the licensor’s intellectual property. Disputes with licensors over license agreements could result
in the payment of additional royalties or penalties by us, cancellation or non-renewal of the underlying license or litigation.
The regulatory review process
and licensing requirements also may preclude us from using technologies owned or developed by third parties if those parties are
unwilling to subject themselves to regulatory review or do not meet regulatory requirements. Some gaming authorities require gaming
manufacturers to obtain approval before engaging in certain transactions, such as acquisitions, mergers, reorganizations, financings,
stock offerings and share repurchases. Obtaining such approvals can be costly and time consuming, and we cannot assure that such
approvals will be granted or that the approval process will not result in delays or disruptions to our strategic objectives.
Our growth will depend, in part, on the success
of our strategic relationships with third parties. Overreliance on certain third parties, or our inability to extend existing relationships
or agree to new relationships may cause unanticipated costs and impact our future financial performance.
We rely on relationships with
advertisers, casinos and other third parties in order to attract users to our platform. These relationships along with providers
of online services, search engines, social media, directories and other websites and ecommerce businesses direct consumers to our
platform. In addition, many of the parties with whom we have advertising arrangements provide advertising services to other companies,
including other gaming platforms with whom we compete. While we believe there are other third parties that could drive users to
our platform, adding or transitioning to them may disrupt our business and increase our costs. In the event that any of our existing
relationships or our future relationships fails to provide services to us in accordance with the terms of our arrangement, or at
all, and we are not able to find suitable alternatives, this could impact our ability to attract consumers in a cost-effective
manner and thus harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
Risks Relating to Compliance with Gaming and Other
Regulations
Our business is subject to a variety of U.S.
laws, many of which are unsettled and still developing, and which could subject us to claims or otherwise harm our business. Any
change in existing regulations or their interpretation, or the regulatory climate applicable to our products and services, or changes
in tax rules and regulations or interpretation thereof related to our products and services, could adversely impact our ability
to operate our business as currently conducted or as we seek to operate in the future, which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are generally subject to laws and regulations relating to iGaming
and online sports betting in the jurisdictions in which we conduct our business, as well as the general laws and regulations that apply
to all e-commerce businesses, such as those related to privacy and personal information, tax and consumer protection. These laws and regulations
vary by jurisdiction and future legislative and regulatory action, court decisions or other governmental action, which may be affected
by, among other things, political pressures, attitudes and climates, as well as personal biases, may have a material impact on our operations
and financial results. Some jurisdictions have introduced regulations attempting to restrict or prohibit online gaming, while others have
taken the position that online gaming should be licensed and regulated and have adopted or are in the process of considering legislation
and regulations to enable that to happen. The regulatory environment in any particular jurisdiction may change in the future and any such
change could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. For example, in 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”)
reversed its previously-issued opinion published in 2011, which stated that interstate transmissions of wire communications that do not
relate to a “sporting event or contest” fall outside the purview of the Wire Act of 1961 (“Wire Act”). The DOJ’s
updated opinion concluded instead that the Wire Act was not uniformly limited to gaming relating to sporting events or contests and that
certain of its provisions apply to non-sports-related wagering activity. In June 2019, a federal district court in New Hampshire
ruled that the DOJ’s new interpretation of the Wire Act was erroneous and vacated the DOJ’s new opinion. The DOJ had appealed
the decision of the district court to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which reaffirmed the district court’s decision
on January 20, 2021. If such ruling were to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, an adverse ruling or other disposition of the case
by the U.S. Supreme Court could impact our ability to engage in online internet gaming in the future.
Future legislative and regulatory
action, and court decisions or other governmental action, may have a material impact on our operations and financial results. Governmental
authorities could view us as having violated local laws, despite our efforts to obtain all applicable licenses or approvals. There
is also risk that civil and criminal proceedings, including class actions brought by or on behalf of prosecutors or public entities
or incumbent monopoly providers, or private individuals, could be initiated against us, Internet service providers, credit
card and other payment processors iGaming and online sports betting industries. Such potential proceedings could involve substantial
litigation expense, penalties, fines, seizure of assets, injunctions or other restrictions being imposed upon is or our licensees
or other business partners, while diverting the attention of key executives. Such proceedings could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, as well as impact our reputation.
There can be no assurance that
legally enforceable legislation will not be proposed and passed in jurisdictions relevant or potentially relevant to our business
to prohibit, legislate or regulate various aspects of the iGaming and online sports betting industries (or that existing laws in
those jurisdictions will not be interpreted negatively). Compliance with any such legislation may have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations, either as a result of our determination that a jurisdiction should
be blocked, or because a local license or approval may be costly for us or our business partners to obtain and/or such licenses
or approvals may contain other commercially undesirable conditions.
Our growth prospects depend on the legal status
of real-money gaming in various jurisdictions and legalization may not occur in as many states as we expect, or may occur at a
slower pace than we anticipate. Additionally, even if jurisdictions legalize real money gaming, this may be accompanied by legislative
or regulatory restrictions and/or taxes that make it impracticable or less attractive to operate in those jurisdictions, or the
process of implementing regulations or securing the necessary licenses to operate in a particular jurisdiction may take longer
than we anticipate, which could adversely affect our future results of operations and make it more difficult to meet our expectations
for financial performance.
Several states have legalized
or are currently evaluating the legalization of real money gaming, and our business, financial condition, results of operations
and business prospects are significantly dependent upon the status of legalization in these states. Our business plan is partially
based upon the legalization of real money gaming in additional states and the legalization may not occur as we have anticipated.
Additionally, if a large number of additional states or the federal government enact real money gaming legislation and we are unable
to obtain, or is otherwise delayed in obtaining, the necessary licenses to operate iGaming websites or online sports betting in
U.S. jurisdictions where such games are legalized, our future growth in iGaming and online sports betting could be materially impaired.
As we enter new jurisdictions,
states or the federal government may legalize real money gaming in a manner that is unfavorable to it. As a result, we may encounter
legal, regulatory and political challenges that are difficult or impossible to foresee and which could result in an unforeseen
adverse impact on planned revenues or costs associated with the new opportunity. For example, certain states require us to have
a relationship with a land-based, licensed casino for iGaming and online sports betting access, which tends to increase our costs.
States that have established state-run monopolies may limit opportunities for private sector participants like us. States also
impose substantial tax rates on online sports betting and iGaming revenue, in addition to a federal excise tax of 25 basis points
on the amount of each sports wager. Tax rates, whether federal- or state-based, that are higher than we expect will make it more
costly and less desirable for it to launch in a given jurisdiction, while tax increases in any of our existing jurisdictions may
adversely impact our profitability.
Therefore, even in cases in
which a jurisdiction purports to license and regulate iGaming or online sports betting, the licensing and regulatory regimes can
vary considerably in terms of their business-friendliness and at times may be intended to provide incumbent operators with advantages
over new licensees. Therefore, some “liberalized” regulatory regimes are considerably more economically viable than
others.
Failure to comply with regulatory requirements
in a particular jurisdiction, or the failure to successfully obtain a license or permit applied for in a particular jurisdiction,
could impact our ability to comply with licensing and regulatory requirements in other jurisdictions, or could cause the rejection
of license applications or cancelation of existing licenses in other jurisdictions, or could cause financial institutions, online
and mobile platforms, and distributors to stop providing services to us, which we rely upon to receive payments from, or distribute
amounts to, our users, or otherwise to deliver and promote our services.
Compliance with the various
regulations applicable and real money gaming is costly and time-consuming. Regulatory authorities at the U.S. federal, state and
local levels have broad powers with respect to the regulation of real money gaming operations and may revoke, suspend, condition
or limit our real money gaming licenses, impose substantial fines or take other actions, any one of which may have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. These laws and regulations are dynamic
and subject to potentially differing interpretations, and various legislative and regulatory bodies may expand current laws or
regulations or enact new laws and regulations regarding these matters. We will strive to comply with all applicable laws and regulations
relating to our business. It is possible, however, that these requirements may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent
from one jurisdiction to another and may conflict with other rules. Non-compliance with any such law or regulations could expose
us to claims, proceedings, litigation and investigations by private parties and regulatory authorities, as well as substantial
fines and negative publicity, each of which may materially and adversely affect our business.
Any real money gaming license
could be revoked, suspended or conditioned at any time. The loss of a license in one jurisdiction could trigger the loss of a license
or affect our eligibility for such a license in another jurisdiction, and any of such losses, or potential for such loss, could
cause us to cease offering some or all of our offerings in the impacted jurisdictions. We may be unable to obtain or maintain all
necessary registrations, licenses, permits or approvals, and could incur fines or experience delays related to the licensing process,
which could adversely affect our operations. Our delay or failure to obtain or maintain licenses in any jurisdiction may prevent
us from distributing our offerings, increasing our customer base and/or generating revenues. We cannot guarantee that we will be
able to obtain and maintain the licenses and related approvals necessary to conduct our iGaming and online sports betting operations.
Any failure to maintain or renew our existing licenses, registrations, permits or approvals could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
Our growth prospects and
market potential will depend on our ability to obtain licenses to operate in a number of jurisdictions and if we fail to obtain
such licenses our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects could be impaired.
Our ability to grow our business
will depend on our ability to obtain and maintain licenses to offer our product offerings in a large number of jurisdictions or
in heavily populated jurisdictions. If we fail to obtain and maintain licenses in large jurisdictions or in a greater number of
mid-market jurisdictions, this may prevent us from expanding the footprint of our product offerings, increasing our user base and/or
generating revenues. We cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain and maintain licenses and related approvals necessary
to conduct our iGaming and online sports betting operations. Any failure to obtain and maintain licenses, registrations, permits
or approvals could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.
In some jurisdictions
our key executives, certain employees or other individuals related to the business are subject to licensing or compliance requirements.
Failure by such individuals to obtain the necessary licenses or comply with individual regulatory obligations, could cause the
business to be non-compliant with our obligations, or imperil our ability to obtain or maintain licenses necessary for the conduct
of the business. In some cases, the remedy to such situation may require the removal of a key executive or employee and the mandatory
redemption or transfer of such person’s equity securities.
As part of obtaining real money
gaming licenses, the responsible gaming authority will generally determine suitability of certain directors, officers and employees
and, in some instances, significant stockholders. The criteria used by gaming authorities to make determinations as to who requires
a finding of suitability or the suitability of an applicant to conduct gaming operations varies among jurisdictions, but generally
requires extensive and detailed application disclosures followed by a thorough investigation. Gaming authorities typically have
broad discretion in determining whether an applicant should be found suitable to conduct operations within a given jurisdiction.
If any gaming authority with jurisdiction over our business were to find an applicable officer, director, employee or significant
stockholder of us unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having a relationship with us, we would be required to sever
our relationship with that person. Furthermore, such gaming authorities may require us to terminate the employment of any person
who refuses to file required applications. Either result could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and prospects.
See “Business — Government Regulation.”
Our Fourth Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation (the “Charter”) provides that any of our capital stock owned or controlled
by any unsuitable person or its affiliates will be transferred to us or one or more third-party transferees, as and to the extent
required by a gaming authority or deemed necessary or advisable by the Board in its sole and absolute discretion.
Additionally, a gaming regulatory
body may refuse to issue or renew a gaming license or restrict or condition the same, based on our present activities or the past
activities of GNOG LLC, or the past or present activities of their current or former directors, officers, employees, stockholders
or third parties with whom we have relationships, which could adversely affect our operations or financial condition. If additional
gaming regulations are adopted in a jurisdiction in which we operate, such regulations could impose restrictions or costs that
could have a significant adverse effect on us. From time to time, various proposals are introduced in the legislatures of some
of the jurisdictions in which we have existing or planned operations that, if enacted, could adversely affect our directors, officers,
key employees, or other aspects of our operations. To date, we have obtained all governmental licenses, findings of suitability,
registrations, permits and approvals necessary for our operations. However, we can give no assurance that any additional licenses,
permits and approvals that may be required will be given or that existing ones will be renewed or will not be revoked. Renewal
is subject to, among other things, continued satisfaction of suitability requirements of our directors, officers, key employees
and stockholders. Any failure to renew or maintain our licenses or to receive new licenses when necessary would have a material
adverse effect on us.
Our ability to offer online sport betting for
NBA games, or at all, is limited in certain jurisdictions due to Fertitta Entertainment, Inc.’s ownership of the Houston
Rockets.
Tilman J. Fertitta, our Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, owns a controlling interest in us. Mr. Fertitta is also the sole shareholder, chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Fertitta Entertainment, Inc., which owns the National Basketball Association’s (“NBA”)
Houston Rockets. Pursuant to New Jersey law, the direct or indirect legal or beneficial owner of 10 percent or more of a member
team of a sport’s governing body shall not place or accept any wager on a sports event in which that member team participates.
Accordingly, in the State of New Jersey, we cannot accept wagers on any NBA games in which the Houston Rockets play or have players
participating in such games, or on the future performance of any Houston Rockets players, thereby limiting our potential revenues
from our online sports betting platform. Michigan’s regulations, once finalized, may result in restrictions similar to those
in New Jersey. Illinois regulations, which have been adopted but not yet published in the register, may also include similar restrictions.
Pennsylvania currently prohibits any such team owner from operating a sports book and this will prohibit us from engaging in any
online sports betting in Pennsylvania. In addition to New Jersey, Michigan and Pennsylvania, online sports betting is legal in
eleven other states and the District of Columbia. Under current gaming laws, due to our affiliation with Mr. Fertitta and
the Houston Rockets, we expect that we would be unable to obtain a license to conduct our online sports betting operations in Colorado
and, if we were able to obtain a license to conduct our online sports betting operations in other states, we would be unable to
accept wagers on Houston Rockets games or players in such other states. Further, states that legalize online sports betting in
the future may also impose limitations on our ability to obtain a license or accept wagers on certain NBA games, certain NBA players
or at all, in each case due to our affiliation with Mr. Fertitta and the Houston Rockets. Moreover, irrespective of jurisdictional
limitations, as a condition of Mr. Fertitta’s ownership of the Houston Rockets, the NBA prohibits any gaming entity
in which Mr. Fertitta or Fertitta Entertainment, Inc. holds a direct or indirect interest, including us, from accepting
any wager on the Houston Rockets, any NBA G League team affiliated with the Houston Rockets, or any game or games involving such
team or any player’s individual performance in such game. The existing limitations on our ability to accept certain sports
wagers may have an adverse impact on our revenues, business and results of operations, and the potential limitations on our ability
to obtain sports betting licenses in the future may have a material adverse effect on the growth of our business.
Failure to protect or enforce our intellectual
property rights or the costs involved in such enforcement could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on trademark, copyright,
trade secret, and domain-name-protection laws to protect our rights and the intellectual property that we license from third parties.
However, third parties may knowingly or unknowingly infringe our rights, third parties may challenge rights used or held by us,
and pending and future trademark and patent applications may not be approved. In addition, effective intellectual property protection
may not be available in every country in which we operate or intend to operate our business. In any of these cases, we may be required
to expend significant time and expense to prevent infringement or to enforce our rights. There can be no assurance that others
will not offer products or services that are substantially similar to our products or services and compete with our business.
Circumstances outside our control
could pose a threat to our right to use intellectual property. For example, effective intellectual property protection may not
be available in the U.S. or other countries from which our iGaming and online sports betting product offerings or platforms are
accessible. Also, the efforts we have taken to protect and enforce our rights may not be sufficient or effective. Any significant
impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm our business or our ability to compete. Also, protecting our intellectual
property rights is costly and time-consuming. Any unauthorized disclosure or use of our owned or licensed intellectual property
could make it more expensive to do business, thereby harming our operating results. Furthermore, if we are unable to protect our
rights or prevent unauthorized use or appropriation by third parties, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be
diminished, and competitors may be able to more effectively mimic our offerings and service. Any of these events could seriously
harm our business.
We may have difficulty accessing the service of banks, credit
card issuers and payment processing services providers, which may impair our ability to sell our products and services.
Although financial institutions
and payment processors are permitted to provide services to us and others in our industry, banks, credit card issuers and payment
processing service providers may be hesitant to offer banking and payment processing services to real money gaming businesses.
Consequently, those businesses involved in our industry, including our own, may encounter difficulties in establishing and maintaining
banking and payment processing relationships with a full scope of services and generating market rate interest. If we were unable
to maintain our bank accounts or our users were unable to use their credit cards, bank accounts or e-wallets to make deposits and
withdrawals from our platforms it would make it difficult for us to operate our business, increase our operating costs, and pose
additional operational, logistical and security challenges which could result in an inability to implement our business plan.
Due to the nature of our business, we are subject to taxation
in several jurisdictions and changes in, or new interpretation of, tax laws, tax rulings or their application by tax authorities could
result in additional tax liabilities and could materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our tax obligations are varied and include U.S. federal and state taxes
due to the nature of our business. The tax laws applicable to our business are subject to interpretation, and significant judgment is
required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the course of our business, there will be many transactions and calculations
where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. In addition, changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof, may require the collection
of information not regularly produced by us, the use of estimates in our consolidated financial statements, and the exercise of significant
judgment in accounting for our provisions, which could cause our results to differ from previous estimates and could materially affect
our consolidated financial statements.
The gaming industry represents
a significant source of tax revenue to the jurisdictions in which we operate. Gaming companies and business-to-business providers
in the gaming industry (directly and/or indirectly by way of their commercial relationships with operators) are currently subject
to significant taxes and fees in addition to normal corporate income taxes, and such taxes and fees are subject to increases at
any time. From time to time, various legislators and other government officials have proposed and adopted changes in tax laws,
or in the administration or interpretation of such laws, affecting the gaming industry. In addition, any worsening of economic
conditions and the large number of jurisdictions with significant current or projected budget deficits could intensify the efforts
of governments to raise revenues through increases in gaming taxes and/or other taxes. It is not possible to determine with certainty
the likelihood of changes in tax laws or in the administration or interpretation or enforcement of such laws. Any material increase,
or the adoption of additional taxes or fees, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations and prospects.
Additionally, tax authorities
may impose indirect taxes on Internet-related commercial activity based on existing statutes and regulations which, in some cases,
were established prior to the advent of the Internet. Tax authorities may interpret laws originally enacted for mature industries
and apply it to newer industries, such as us. The application of such laws may be inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
Our in-jurisdiction activities may vary from period to period which could result in differences in nexus from period to period.
We are subject to periodic review
and audit by domestic tax authorities. Tax authorities may disagree with certain positions we have taken or that we will take,
and any adverse outcome of such a review or audit could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations. Although we believe that our tax provisions, positions and estimates are reasonable and appropriate, tax authorities
may disagree with certain positions we have taken. In addition, economic and political pressures to increase tax revenue in various
jurisdictions may make resolving tax disputes favorably more difficult.
GNOG LLC was included in the
consolidated tax return of Fertitta Entertainment, Inc. pursuant to a tax sharing agreement. On July 21, 2020, FEI was
informed by the IRS that the year 2017 and 2018 tax returns are under audit. An opening conference is scheduled for September 22,
2020.
Unanticipated changes in effective tax rates
or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our income or other tax returns could adversely affect our financial condition
and results of operations.
We are subject to income taxes
in the United States, and our domestic tax liabilities are subject to the allocation of expenses in differing jurisdictions. Our
future effective tax rates could be subject to volatility or adversely affected by a number of factors, including:
|
•
|
changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities;
|
|
•
|
expected timing and amount of the release of any tax valuation allowances;
|
|
•
|
tax effects of stock-based compensation;
|
|
•
|
costs related to intercompany restructurings;
|
|
•
|
changes in tax laws, regulations or interpretations thereof; and
|
|
•
|
lower than anticipated future earnings in jurisdictions where we have lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated
future earnings in jurisdictions where we have higher statutory tax rates.
|
In addition, we may be subject
to audits of our income, sales and other transaction taxes by U.S. federal and state authorities. Outcomes from these audits could
have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Relating to Our Management and Operations
We are subject to risks related to the geographic
concentration of our operations.
All of GNOG LLC’s revenue
to date was generated from its online gaming operations in New Jersey and we expect that it will continue to generate substantially
all of its revenues in New Jersey until such time that we are able to generate a material portion of our revenues from online gaming
in other states. Even if our planned launch of online gaming platforms in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Illinois and West Virginia
is successful, our operations will be limited to five states. Changes to prevailing economic, demographic, competitive, regulatory
or any other conditions in the markets in which we operate, particularly in New Jersey, could lead to a reduction in demand for
our offerings, resulting in a decline in our revenues and, in turn, a material deterioration of our financial condition. Further,
our ability to geographically diversify our revenues is limited by the legal status of real money gaming in other jurisdictions.
See “— Our growth prospects depend on the legal status of real-money gaming in various jurisdictions and legalization
may not occur in as many states as we expect, or may occur at a slower pace than we anticipate. Additionally, even if jurisdictions
legalize real money gaming, this may be accompanied by legislative or regulatory restrictions and/or taxes that make it impracticable
or less attractive to operate in those jurisdictions, or the process of implementing regulations or securing the necessary licenses
to operate in a particular jurisdiction may take longer than we anticipate, which could adversely affect our future results of
operations and make it more difficult to meet our expectations for financial performance.”
We may be subject to litigation which, if adversely
determined, could cause us to incur substantial losses. An adverse outcome in one or more of such proceedings could adversely affect
our business.
From time to time during the
normal course of operating our business, we may be subject to various litigation claims and legal disputes. Some of the litigation
claims may not be covered under our insurance policies, or our insurance carriers may seek to deny coverage. As a result, we might
also be required to incur significant legal fees, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial position. In addition,
because we cannot accurately predict the outcome of any action, it is possible that, as a result of current and/or future litigation,
we will be subject to adverse judgments or settlements that could significantly reduce our earnings or result in losses.
In addition, any litigation
to which we are a party may result in an onerous or unfavorable judgment that may not be reversed upon appeal, or in payments of
substantial monetary damages or fines, the posting of bonds requiring significant collateral, letters of credit or similar instruments,
or we may decide to settle lawsuits on similarly unfavorable terms. These proceedings could also result in reputational harm, criminal
sanctions, consent decrees or orders preventing us from offering certain products or requiring a change in our business practices
in costly ways or requiring development of non-infringing or otherwise altered products or technologies. Litigation and other claims
and regulatory proceedings against us could result in unexpected disciplinary actions, expenses and liabilities, which could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Our continued growth and success will depend on the performance
of our current and future employees, including certain key employees. Recruitment and retention of these individuals is vital to growing
our business and meeting our business plans. The loss of any of our key executives or other key employees could harm our business. We
are dependent on the continued service of our key executives and other key personnel and if we fail to retain such individuals, our business
could be adversely affected.
We depend on a limited number
of key executives and other key personnel to manage and operate our business, including Tilman Fertitta, Michael Harwell and Thomas
Winter. The leadership of these key executives and key personnel was a critical element of GNOG LLC’s previous success, and
we expect that such leadership will continue to be a critical element of our success in the future. The departure, death or disability
of any one of these individuals, or other extended or permanent loss of any of their services, or any negative market or industry
perception with respect to any of them or their loss, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In
addition, certain of our other employees have made significant contributions to our growth and success. We believe our success
and ability to compete and grow will depend in large part on the efforts and talents of our employees and on our ability to retain highly
skilled personnel. The competition for these types of personnel is intense and we compete with other potential employers for the services
of our employees. As a result, we may not succeed in retaining the executives and other key employees that we need. Employees, particularly
analysts and engineers, are in high demand, and we devote significant resources to identifying, hiring, training, successfully integrating
and retaining these employees. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to attract or retain such highly qualified personnel in
the future. If we do not succeed in attracting, hiring, and integrating excellent personnel, or retaining and motivating existing personnel,
we may be unable to grow effectively, and our business could be seriously harmed. In addition, the loss of employees or the inability
to hire additional skilled employees as necessary could result in significant disruptions to our business, and the integration of replacement
personnel could be time-consuming and expensive and cause additional disruptions to our business.
We may invest in or acquire other businesses,
and our business may suffer if we are unable to successfully integrate acquired businesses or otherwise manage the growth associated
with these acquisitions.
As part of our business strategy,
we may make acquisitions as opportunities arise to add new or complementary businesses, products, brands or technologies. In some
cases, the costs of such acquisitions may be substantial, including as a result of professional fees and due diligence efforts.
There is no assurance that the time and resources expended on pursuing acquisitions will result in a completed transaction, or
that any completed transaction will ultimately be successful. In addition, we may be unable to identify suitable acquisition or
strategic investment opportunities or may be unable to obtain any required financing or regulatory approvals, and therefore may
be unable to complete such acquisitions or strategic investments on favorable terms, if at all. We may decide to pursue acquisitions
with which our investors may not agree, and we cannot assure investors that any acquisition or investment will be successful or
otherwise provide a favorable return on investment. In addition, acquisitions and the integration thereof require significant time
and resources and place significant demands on our management, as well as on our operational and financial infrastructure. Furthermore,
if we fail to successfully close transactions or integrate new teams, or integrate the products and technologies associated with
these acquisitions into us, our business could be adversely affected. Acquisitions may expose us to operational challenges and
risks, including:
|
•
|
the ability to profitably manage acquired businesses or successfully integrate the acquired businesses’ operations, personnel,
financial reporting, accounting and internal controls, technologies and products into our business;
|
|
•
|
increased indebtedness and the expense of integrating acquired businesses, including significant administrative, operational,
economic, geographic or cultural challenges in managing and integrating the expanded or combined operations;
|
|
•
|
entry into jurisdictions or acquisition of products or technologies with which we have limited or no prior experience, and
the potential of increased competition with new or existing competitors as a result of such acquisitions;
|
|
•
|
diversion of management’s attention and the over-extension of our operating infrastructure and our management systems,
information technology systems, and internal controls and procedures, which may be inadequate to support growth;
|
|
•
|
the ability to fund our capital needs and any cash flow shortages that may occur if anticipated revenue is not realized or
is delayed, whether by general economic or market conditions, or unforeseen internal difficulties; and
|
|
•
|
the ability to retain or hire qualified personnel required for expanded operations.
|
Our acquisition
strategy may not succeed if we are unable to remain attractive to target companies or expeditiously close transactions. Issuing shares
of common stock to fund an acquisition may cause economic dilution to existing stockholders. If we develop a reputation for being a difficult
acquirer or having an unfavorable work environment, or target companies view our common stock unfavorably, we may be unable to consummate
key acquisition transactions essential to our corporate strategy and our business may be materially harmed.
Our insurance may not provide adequate levels of coverage against
claims
We maintain insurance that we believe is customary
for businesses of our size and type. However, there are types of losses we may incur that cannot be insured against or that we believe
are not economically reasonable to insure. Moreover, any loss incurred could exceed policy limits and policy payments made to us may not
be made on a timely basis. Such losses could adversely affect our business prospects, results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition.
Furthermore, from time to time we may be subject
to litigation, including potential stockholder derivative actions. Risks associated with legal liability are difficult to assess and quantify,
and their existence and magnitude can remain unknown for significant periods of time. We do not currently maintain directors’ and
officers’ liability (“D&O”) insurance to cover such risk exposure for our directors and officers. Such insurance
generally pays the expenses (including amounts paid to plaintiffs, fines and expenses including attorneys’ fees) of officers and
directors who are the subject of a lawsuit as a result of their service to the company. If we obtain D&O insurance in the future,
the amount of D&O insurance we obtain may not be adequate to cover such expenses should such a lawsuit occur, and our deductibles
may be higher than we may be able to pay. Applicable Delaware law provides for the indemnification of our directors, officers, employees
and agents, under certain circumstances, for attorney’s fees and other expenses incurred by them in any litigation to which they
become a party resulting from their association with us or activities on our behalf. Without adequate D&O insurance, the amounts we
pay to indemnify our officers and directors in connection with their being subject to legal action based on their service to us could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Further, our lack of D&O insurance
may make it difficult for us to retain and attract talented and skilled directors and officers, which could adversely affect our business.
Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Class A
Common Stock
Because
we have elected to take advantage of the “controlled company” exemption to the corporate governance rules under
Nasdaq rules, our stockholders do not have certain corporate governance protections that are available to stockholders of companies
that are not controlled companies and which could make our common stock less attractive to some investors or otherwise harm our
stock price.
Under Nasdaq rules, a company
in which more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by an individual, a group or another company will
qualify as a “controlled company.” Since Mr. Fertitta and his affiliates control a majority of the voting power
of our outstanding capital stock, we are a “controlled company” under Nasdaq rules. As a controlled company, we are
not required to comply with certain Nasdaq rules that would otherwise require us to have: (i) a board of directors comprised
of a majority of independent directors; (ii) compensation of our executive officers determined by a majority of the independent
directors or a compensation committee comprised solely of independent directors; (iii) a compensation committee charter which,
among other things, provides the compensation committee with the authority and funding to retain compensation consultants and other
advisors; and (iv) director nominees selected, or recommended for the Board’s selection, either by a majority of the
independent directors or a nominating committee comprised solely of independent directors.
Because we have elected to take
advantage of the exemptions available to controlled companies, our stockholders do not have the same protections afforded to stockholders
of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements under the Nasdaq rules without regard to the
exemptions available for “controlled companies.” Our status as a controlled company could make our common stock less
attractive to some investors or otherwise harm our stock price.
Mr. Fertitta and his affiliates
may have their interest in us diluted due to future equity issuances or his own actions in selling shares of common stock, in each
case, which could result in a loss of the “controlled company” exemption under Nasdaq rules. If this were to happen,
we would then be required to comply with those provisions of Nasdaq rules.
The dual class structure of our common stock
has the effect of concentrating voting power with Tilman Fertitta and his affiliates, which limits an investor’s ability
to influence the outcome of important transactions, including a change in control.
Shares
of Class B common stock have 10 votes per share, subject to certain adjustments and limitations described elsewhere in this Annual
Report, while shares of Class A common stock have one vote per share. Mr. Fertitta, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
and the indirect owner of all of the equity interests in LF LLC, indirectly holds all of the issued and outstanding shares of Class B
common stock. Accordingly, by virtue of the holdings by Mr. Fertitta and his affiliates, including LF LLC, of shares of Class A
common stock and Class B common stock, Mr. Fertitta and his affiliates beneficially own 79.9% of the voting power of our capital
stock (as a result of the automatic downward adjustment of Mr. Fertitta and his affiliates’ voting power in accordance with
the terms of our Charter), and is able to exercise significant influence over our business policies and affairs, including controlling
the composition of our board of directors, matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors, amendments
of organizational documents and any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets or other major corporate transactions.
The directors designated by Mr. Fertitta may have significant authority to effect decisions affecting our capital structure, including
the issuance of additional capital stock, incurrence of additional indebtedness, the implementation of stock repurchase programs and
the decision of whether or not to declare dividends.
Mr. Fertitta
and his affiliates may have interests that differ from yours and may vote in a way with which you disagree and which may be adverse
to your interests. For example, Mr. Fertitta and his affiliates may support certain long-term strategies or objectives for us
that may not be accretive to stockholders in the short term. This concentrated control may have the effect of delaying, preventing
or deterring a change in control of us, make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of Mr. Fertitta
and his affiliates, deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their capital stock as part of a sale of us,
and might ultimately affect the market price of shares of the Class A common stock. In addition, Mr. Fertitta and his
affiliates have registration rights under a registration rights agreement (the “A&R Registration Rights
Agreement”). In connection with the Closing, we entered into the A&R Registration Rights Agreement with the Sponsors, Tilman Fertitta and certain
of his affiliates, which provides that the holders of the founder shares or private placement warrants (and the shares of Class A common
stock issuable upon conversion of the founder shares or private placement warrants) and holders of Class A common stock issuable pursuant
to the Purchase Agreement and the A&R HoldCo LLC Agreement are entitled to registration rights. Under the terms of the A&R Registration
Rights Agreement, these holders are entitled to make up to three demands, excluding short form registration demands, that the Company
register such securities for sale under the Securities Act. In addition, these holders have "piggy-back" registration rights to include
their securities in other registration statements filed by the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, JFG Sponsor may not exercise its
demand and "piggyback" registration rights after five and seven years, respectively after the effective date of the registration statement
relating to the IPO and may not exercise its demand rights on more than one occasion. The Company will bear the expenses incurred in connection
with the filing of any such registration statements.
Further,
sales of common stock by Mr. Fertitta and his affiliates or the perception that sales may be made by Mr. Fertitta and his affiliates
could significantly reduce the market price of shares of Class A common stock. Even if Mr. Fertitta and his affiliates do not
sell a large number of common stock into the market, their right to transfer such shares may depress the price of Class A common
stock.
We cannot predict the impact our dual class
structure may have on the stock price of the Class A common stock.
We cannot predict whether our
dual class structure will result in a lower or more volatile market price of the Class A common stock or in adverse publicity
or other adverse consequences. For example, certain index providers have announced restrictions on including companies with multiple-class
share structures in certain of their indexes. In July 2017, FTSE Russell and S&P Dow Jones announced that they would cease
to allow most newly public companies utilizing dual or multi-class capital structures to be included in their indexes. Affected
indexes include the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400 and S&P SmallCap 600, which collectively make up the
S&P Composite 1500. Beginning in 2017, MSCI, a leading stock index provider, opened public consultations on its treatment of
no-vote and multi-class structures and temporarily barred new multi-class listings from certain of its indexes; however, in October 2018,
MSCI announced its decision to include equity securities “with unequal voting structures” in its indexes and to launch
a new index that specifically includes voting rights in its eligibility criteria. Under these policies, our dual class capital
structure would make us ineligible for inclusion in certain indexes, and as a result, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and other
investment vehicles that attempt to passively track those indexes will not be investing in our stock. It continues to be somewhat
unclear what effect, if any, these policies will have on the valuations of publicly traded companies excluded from the indexes,
but it is possible that they may depress these valuations compared to those of other similar companies that are included. Because
of our dual class structure, we will likely be excluded from certain of these indexes and we cannot assure you that other stock
indexes will not take similar actions. Given the sustained flow of investment funds into passive strategies that seek to track
certain indexes, exclusion from stock indexes would likely preclude investment by many of these funds and could make shares of
our Class A common stock less attractive to other investors. As a result, the market price of shares of our Class A common
stock could be adversely affected.
Anti-takeover provisions contained in our Charter
and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover attempt.
Our Charter contains provisions
that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that stockholders may consider to be in their best interests. We are also subject
to anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law, which could delay or prevent a change of control. These provisions are intended
to avoid costly takeover battles, reduce our vulnerability to a hostile change of control and enhance the ability of our Board
to maximize stockholder value in connection with any unsolicited offer to acquire us. However, these provisions may make more difficult
the removal of management, may have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, deter or prevent a merger or acquisition of us by means
of a tender offer, a proxy contest or other takeover attempt that a stockholder might consider in its best interest, including
those attempts that might result in a premium over the prevailing market price for our securities. These provisions provide for,
among other things:
|
•
|
authorized but unissued shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock and preferred stock, which may be
used for a variety of corporate finance transactions, acquisitions and employee benefit plans and the existence of which could
make more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise
(the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (“DGCL”) does not require stockholder approval for any issuance
of authorized shares);
|
|
•
|
stockholder action by written consent only until the first time when Mr. Fertitta and his affiliates cease to beneficially
own a majority of the voting power of our capital stock (the DGCL provides that unless otherwise provided in the Charter, any action
of a meeting of stockholders may be taken without a meeting and prior notice by signed written consent of stockholders having the
minimum number of votes that would be necessary to take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were
present and voted);
|
|
•
|
amendment of our organizational documents only by the affirmative vote of (i) a majority of the voting power of our capital
stock so long as Mr. Fertitta and his affiliates beneficially own shares representing a majority of the voting power of our
capital stock and (ii) at least two-thirds of the voting power of the capital stock from and after the time that Mr. Fertitta
and his affiliates cease to beneficially own shares representing a majority of the voting power of our voting stock (the DGCL provides
generally that the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single
class, is required to amend a corporation’s certificate of incorporation, unless the certificate of incorporation requires
a greater percentage);
|
|
•
|
provisions detailing that the number of directors may be fixed and may be modified either (a) by our board of directors
or (b) by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock, depending
on the number of shares of our capital stock beneficially owned by Mr. Fertitta and his affiliates at such time;
|
|
•
|
advance notice for nominations of directors by stockholders and for stockholders to include matters to be considered at annual
meetings, which may discourage or deter a potential acquirer from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquirer’s
own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us; and
|
|
•
|
the ability of our board of directors to issue one or more series of preferred stock.
|
Our Charter includes a forum selection clause,
which could discourage claims or limit stockholders’ ability to make a claim against us, our directors, officers, other employees
or stockholders.
Our Charter includes a forum
selection clause. Our Charter provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware shall be the sole and exclusive forum for any stockholder (including a beneficial owner) to bring:
(i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company; (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach
of fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders; (iii) any action asserting
a claim against us, our directors, officers or employees arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our Charter or bylaws;
or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us, our directors, officers or employees governed by the internal affairs doctrine,
except for, as to each of (i) through (iv) above, any claim (A) as to which the Court of Chancery determines that
there is an indispensable party not subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery (and the indispensable party does not
consent to the personal jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery within 10 days following such determination), (B) which is vested
in the exclusive jurisdiction of a court or forum other than the Court of Chancery, or (C) for which the Court of Chancery
does not have subject matter jurisdiction. Nonetheless, pursuant to our Charter, the foregoing provisions will not apply to suits
brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
Further, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States
shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.
Under the Securities Act, federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability
created by the Securities Act, and stockholders cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and
regulations thereunder. Accordingly, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such a forum selection provision
as written in connection with claims arising under the Securities Act. This forum selection clause may also discourage claims or
limit stockholders’ ability to submit claims in a judicial forum that they find favorable and may result in additional costs
for a stockholder seeking to bring a claim. While we believe the risk of a court declining to enforce this forum selection clause
is low, if a court were to determine the forum selection clause to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur
additional costs in conjunction with our efforts to resolve the dispute in an alternative jurisdiction, which could have a negative
impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
A court may find that part or all of the provision
included in the Charter pertaining to the automatic transfer right and transfer restrictions with respect to capital stock held
by any stockholders who are Unsuitable Persons is not enforceable, either in general or as to a particular fact situation.
Under the laws of the State
of Delaware, our jurisdiction of incorporation, a corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation for the number of
securities that may be owned by any person or group of persons for the purpose of maintaining any statutory or regulatory advantage
or complying with any statutory or regulatory requirements under applicable law. Delaware law provides that ownership limitations
with respect to shares of our stock issued prior to the effectiveness of our Charter will be effective against (i) stockholders
with respect to shares that were voted in favor of the proposed provision and (ii) purported transferees of shares that were
voted for the proposed provision if (A) the transfer restrictions are conspicuously noted on the certificate(s) representing
such shares or (B) the transferee had actual knowledge of the transfer restrictions (even absent such conspicuous notation).
We intend that shares of stock issued after the effectiveness of our Charter will be issued with the ownership limitation conspicuously
noted on the certificate(s) representing such shares and therefore under Delaware law such newly issued shares will be subject
to the transfer restriction. We also intend to disclose such restrictions to persons holding our stock in uncertificated form.
We cannot
assure you that the provision pertaining to the automatic transfer right and transfer restrictions with respect to capital stock held
by any stockholders who any gaming authority with jurisdiction over our business were to find unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having a relationship
with us (“Unsuitable Persons”) is enforceable under all circumstances, particularly against stockholders who do not vote
in favor of the proposed provision, who do not have notice of the ownership limitations at the time they subsequently acquire their shares,
or who acquire shares that were owned, at the time of the vote on the proposed provision, by a stockholder (or stockholders) who did
not vote such shares in favor of the proposed provision. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we would be able to redeem the shares
of a stockholder deemed an Unsuitable Person by applicable regulatory authorities.
We are an emerging growth company and a smaller
reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements
available to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors
and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.
We are an “emerging growth
company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS
Act”), and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public
companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor internal
controls attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive
compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory
vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result,
our stockholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We could be an emerging growth company for
up to five years from our IPO, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if, the market value
of Class A common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700.0 million as of any June 30 before that time, in which case
we would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31. We cannot predict whether investors will
find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive
as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be,
there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
Further, Section 102(b)(1) of
the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards
until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not
have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting
standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements
that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out
of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates
for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies
adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another public company which is neither
an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company that has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult
or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
Additionally, we are a “smaller
reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of
certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements.
We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which (1) the market value of our common
stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $250.0 million as of the prior June 30th, or (2) our annual revenues exceeded $100
million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million
as of the prior June 30th. To the extent we take advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison
of our financial statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.
We have identified a material weakness in our internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. If we are unable to develop and maintain an effective system of internal control over
financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor
confidence in us and materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
During
the audit of GNOG LLC’s 2019 financial statements, its management determined that it had a material weakness related to the
computation of its provision for income taxes. In response to this finding, GNOG LLC changed its internal control processes
regarding the provision for income tax computation and retained third party tax advisors to review these computations. In 2020, GNOG
LLC’s management believed it had taken the appropriate measure to remediate this material weakness.
As a private
company, GNOG LLC was not required to maintain disclosure controls or document and test its internal control over financial reporting.
Further, GNOG LLC’s management was not required to certify the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting and
its auditors were not required to opine on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Similarly, as an “emerging
growth company,” Landcadia was exempt from the SEC’s internal control reporting requirements. If and when we lose our emerging
growth company status and when we become subject to the SEC’s internal control over financial reporting management and auditor
attestation requirements, we may not be able to complete our evaluation, testing and any required remediation in a timely fashion. See
“—We are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take advantage of certain exemptions
from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and
may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies” above.
In addition, as described in Note 2. Restatement of Previously Issued
Financial Statements, subsequent to the issuance of our 2020 consolidated financial statements, our management determined there was an
error related to the accounting treatment of the warrants previously issued. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies,
in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual consolidated
financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
We have
developed and are implementing a plan to remediate this material weakness to address the restatement noted above to improve the process
and controls in the determination of the appropriate accounting and classification of our financial instruments and key agreements. However,
we cannot assure you that this will occur within a specific timeframe. This material weaknesses will not be remediated until all necessary
internal controls have been implemented, tested and determined to be operating effectively. In addition, we may need to take additional
measures to address the material weaknesses or modify the planned remediation steps, and we cannot be certain that the measures we have
taken, and expect to take, to improve our internal controls will be sufficient to address the issues identified, to ensure that our internal
controls are effective or to ensure that the identified material weaknesses will not result in a material misstatement of our annual consolidated
financial statements. Moreover, we cannot assure you that we will not identify additional material weaknesses in our internal control
over financial reporting in the future.
If we are unable to remediate the material weaknesses, our ability
to record, process and report financial information accurately, and to prepare financial statements within the time periods specified
by the rules and forms of the SEC, could be adversely affected. This failure could negatively affect the market price and trading liquidity
of our Class A common stock, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, subject us to civil and criminal
investigations and penalties, increase the risk of liability arising from litigation based on securities law, and generally materially
and adversely impact our business and financial condition.
Future sales of substantial amounts of Class A
common stock in the public market (including shares of Class A common stock issuable in connection with the exercise of our
warrants), or the perception that such sales may occur, could cause the market price for our Class A common stock to decline.
The sale of shares of our
Class A common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could harm the prevailing
market price of shares of our Class A common stock. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also
might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem
appropriate.
Our sponsors
and Mr. Fertitta entered into a letter agreement with us, which was amended by lock-up amendment at the completion of the acquisition
of GNOG LLC (the “Closing”), pursuant to which they have agreed not to transfer, assign or sell any of their founder shares
(except to certain permitted transferees) until the earliest of (A) one year after the Closing or (B) subsequent to the Closing,
(x) if the last sale price of the Class A common stock equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock
dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least
150 days after the Closing, (y) if the last sale price of the Class A common stock equals or exceeds $15.00 per share (as adjusted
for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day
period commencing at least 60 days after the Closing or (z) the date on which we complete a liquidation, merger, capital stock exchange,
reorganization or other similar transaction that results in all of the Company’s stockholders having the right to exchange their
shares of common stock for cash, securities or other property.
In addition, we have
reserved a total of 5,000,000 shares of Class A common stock for issuance under our Incentive Plan. Any shares of
Class A common stock that we issue under our Incentive Plan or other equity incentive plans that we may adopt in the
future would dilute the percentage ownership held by the investors. As the lock-up restrictions on the shares of our
Class A common stock and other restrictions on resale end or if these stockholders exercise their sale, exchange or
registration rights and sell shares or are perceived by the market as intending to sell shares, the market price of our
shares of Class A common stock could drop significantly. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to raise
additional funds through future offerings of our shares of Class A common stock or other securities.
Furthermore, we have issued
warrants to purchase 16,425,000 shares of Company Class A common stock. The additional shares of Class A common stock
issued upon exercise of our warrants will result in dilution to then existing holders of our common stock and will increase the
number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market could
adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
In the future, we may also issue
securities in connection with investments, acquisitions or capital raising activities. In particular, the number of shares of our
Class A common stock issued in connection with an investment or acquisition, or to raise additional equity capital, could
constitute a material portion of our then-outstanding shares of our Class A common stock. Any such issuance of additional
securities in the future may result in additional dilution to you or may adversely impact the price of our Class A common
stock.
We may be required to take write-downs or write-offs,
restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results
of operations and our stock price, which could cause you to lose some or all of your investment.
We may be forced to write-down
or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our reporting losses.
Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges
of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this nature
may cause us to violate net worth or other covenants to which we may be subject. Accordingly, a stockholder could suffer a reduction
in the value of their shares.
The trading price of our Class A common
stock and warrants may be volatile.
The trading price of our securities
could be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. Any of
the factors listed below could have a material adverse effect on your investment in our securities and our securities may trade
at prices significantly below the price you paid for them. In such circumstances, the trading price of our securities may not recover
and may experience a further decline.
Factors affecting the trading
price of our securities may include:
|
•
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly financial results of companies perceived
to be similar to us;
|
|
•
|
changes in the market’s expectations about our operating results;
|
|
•
|
the public’s reaction to our press releases, our other public announcements and our filings with the SEC;
|
|
•
|
speculation in the press or investment community;
|
|
•
|
success of competitors;
|
|
•
|
our operating results failing to meet the expectation of securities analysts or investors in a particular period;
|
|
•
|
changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning us or the market in general;
|
|
•
|
operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us;
|
|
•
|
our ability to market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;
|
|
•
|
changes in laws and regulations affecting our business;
|
|
•
|
commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving us;
|
|
•
|
changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;
|
|
•
|
the volume of shares of common stock available for public sale;
|
|
•
|
any major change in the Board or management;
|
|
•
|
sales of substantial amounts of common stock by our directors, officers or significant stockholders or the perception that
such sales could occur; and
|
|
•
|
general economic and political conditions such as recessions, interest rates, fuel prices, international currency fluctuations
and acts of war or terrorism.
|
Broad market and industry factors
may materially harm the market price of our securities irrespective of our operating performance. The stock market in general and
Nasdaq have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance
of the particular companies affected. The trading prices and valuations of these stocks, and of our securities, may not be predictable.
A loss of investor confidence in the market for the stocks of other companies that investors perceive to be similar to us could
depress our stock price regardless of our business, prospects, financial conditions or results of operations. A decline in the
market price of our securities also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional securities and our ability to obtain
additional financing in the future.
In the past, securities class
action litigation has often been initiated against companies following periods of volatility in their stock price. This type of
litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources, and could also require
us to make substantial payments to satisfy judgments or to settle litigation.
The coverage of our business or our securities
by securities or industry analysts or the absence thereof could adversely affect our securities and trading volume.
The trading market for our securities
is influenced in part by the research and other reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business or
industry from time to time. We do not control these analysts or the content and opinions included in their reports. As a former
shell company, we may be slow to attract equity research coverage, and the analysts who publish information about our securities
will have had relatively little experience with our company, which could affect their ability to accurately forecast our results
and make it more likely that we fail to meet their estimates. If no or few analysts commence equity research coverage of us, the
trading price and volume of our securities would likely be negatively impacted. If analysts do cover us and one or more of them
downgrade our securities, or if they issue other unfavorable commentary about us or our industry or inaccurate research, our stock
price would likely decline. Furthermore, if one or more of these analysts cease coverage or fail to regularly publish reports on
us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets. Any of the foregoing would likely cause our stock price and trading volume
to decline.
The
exercise of warrants for our Class A common stock would increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market
and result in dilution to our stockholders.
As of December 31, 2020, we had warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 16,425,000 shares of our Class A common stock outstanding. All of our Public Warrants were exercised or redeemed as of March
8, 2021. To the extent remaining private placement warrants are exercised, additional shares of Class A common stock will be issued, which
will result in dilution to the then-existing holders of Class A common stock and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in
the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market or the fact that such warrants may be exercised could
adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.
The
valuation of our warrants could increase the volatility in our net income (loss) in our consolidated statements of earnings (loss).
On April 12, 2021, the Acting Director of the Division of
Corporation Finance and Acting Chief Accountant of the SEC together issued a statement regarding the accounting and reporting
considerations for warrants issued by special purpose acquisition companies entitled “Staff Statement on Accounting and
Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (“SPACs”)” (the “SEC
Statement”). Specifically, the SEC Statement focused on certain settlement terms and provisions related to certain tender
offers following a business combination, which terms are similar to those contained in the warrant agreement governing our warrants.
As a result of the SEC Statement, we reevaluated the accounting treatment of our 10,541,667 public warrants and 5,883,333 private
placement warrants which were outstanding as of December 31, 2020, and determined to classify the warrants as derivative liabilities
measured at fair value, with changes in fair value each period reported in earnings.
As a result, included on our consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2020 contained elsewhere in this Annual Report are derivative liabilities related to embedded features contained within
our warrants. Accounting Standards Codification 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”), provides for the remeasurement
of the fair value of such derivatives at each balance sheet date, with a resulting non-cash gain or loss related to the change in
the fair value being recognized in earnings in the statement of operations. As a result of the recurring fair value measurement, our
consolidated financial statements and results of operations may fluctuate quarterly, based on factors, which are outside of our
control. Due to the recurring fair value measurement, we expect that we will recognize non-cash gains or losses on our warrants each
reporting period and that the amount of such gains or losses could be material.
Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure
We are a holding company and our only material
asset is our interest in Landcadia HoldCo, and we are accordingly dependent upon distributions made by Landcadia HoldCo to pay
taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and pay dividends.
We are a holding company with
no material assets other than our ownership of membership interests in Landcadia HoldCo. As a result, we have no independent means
of generating revenue or cash flow. Our ability to pay taxes, make payments under the tax receivable agreement we entered into
with LF LLC in connection with the Closing (the “Tax Receivable Agreement”) and pay dividends will depend on the financial
results and cash flows of Landcadia HoldCo and its subsidiaries and the distributions we receive from Landcadia HoldCo. Deterioration
in the financial condition, earnings or cash flow of Landcadia HoldCo and its subsidiaries for any reason could limit or impair
Landcadia HoldCo’s ability to pay such distributions. Additionally, to the extent that we need funds and Landcadia HoldCo
and/or any of its subsidiaries are restricted from making such distributions under applicable law or regulation or under the terms
of any financing arrangements, including the Credit Agreement, or Landcadia HoldCo is otherwise unable to provide such funds,
it could materially adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.
Landcadia HoldCo is treated
as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as such, generally is not subject to any entity-level U.S. federal income
tax. Instead, taxable income is allocated to holders of its membership interests. Accordingly, we will be required to pay income
taxes on our allocable share of any net taxable income of Landcadia HoldCo. Under the terms of the A&R HoldCo LLC Agreement,
Landcadia HoldCo generally is obligated to make tax distributions to the members of Landcadia HoldCo (including us) calculated
at certain assumed tax rates. In addition to income taxes, we incur expenses related to our operations, including payment obligations
under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which could be significant. In general, we intend to cause Landcadia HoldCo to make ordinary
distributions and tax distributions to holders of its membership interests on a pro rata basis in amounts sufficient to cover all
applicable taxes, relevant operating expenses, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and dividends, if any, declared by us.
However, as discussed below, Landcadia HoldCo’s ability to make such distributions may be subject to various limitations
and restrictions including, but not limited to, retention of amounts necessary to satisfy the obligations of Landcadia HoldCo and
its subsidiaries and restrictions on distributions that would violate any applicable restrictions contained in Landcadia HoldCo’s
debt agreements, or any applicable law, or that would have the effect of rendering Landcadia HoldCo insolvent.
Additionally, although Landcadia
HoldCo generally will not be subject to any entity-level U.S. federal income tax, it may be liable under U.S. federal tax law for
adjustments to its tax return, absent an election to the contrary. In the event Landcadia HoldCo’s calculations of taxable
income are incorrect, Landcadia HoldCo and/or its members, including us, in later years may be subject to material liabilities
pursuant to this federal law and its related guidance.
Dividends
on Class A common stock, if any, will be paid at the discretion of the Board, which will consider, among other things, our available
cash, available borrowings and other funds legally available therefor, taking into account the retention of any amounts necessary to
satisfy our obligations that will not be reimbursed by Landcadia HoldCo, including taxes and amounts payable under the Tax Receivable
Agreement and any restrictions in then applicable bank financing agreements. Financing arrangements may also include restrictive covenants
that restrict our ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to our stockholders. In addition, Landcadia HoldCo generally is
prohibited under Delaware law from making a distribution to a member to the extent that, at the time of the distribution, after giving
effect to the distribution, liabilities of Landcadia HoldCo (with certain exceptions) exceed the fair value of its assets. Landcadia
HoldCo’s subsidiaries generally are subject to similar legal limitations on their ability to make distributions to Landcadia HoldCo.
Further, the Credit Agreement will limit the ability of GNOG LLC to make distributions to Landcadia HoldCo. If Landcadia HoldCo does
not have sufficient funds to make distributions, our ability to declare and pay cash dividends may also be restricted or impaired.
The Tax Receivable Agreement requires that
we make cash payments to LF LLC for certain tax benefits we may realize in the future, and these payments could be substantial
and could be accelerated upon certain events, including a change of control.
In
general, beginning 180 days after the Closing, LF LLC may exchange HoldCo Class B Units for shares of Class A common
stock or, at our election, in our capacity as the sole managing member of Landcadia HoldCo, cash, pursuant to the A&R HoldCo
LLC Agreement. These exchanges, certain actual or deemed distributions from Landcadia HoldCo to LF LLC, and certain other transactions
may result in increases in our pro rata share of the tax basis of Landcadia HoldCo’s assets that otherwise would not have
been available. Such increases in tax basis may increase (for certain income tax purposes) depreciation and amortization deductions
allocable to us and therefore reduce the amount of income tax attributable to Landcadia HoldCo’s operations that we would
otherwise be required to pay in the future and also may decrease gain (or increase loss) otherwise allocable to us from Landcadia
HoldCo on future dispositions of certain of Landcadia HoldCo’s assets to the extent the increased tax basis is allocated
to those assets. The IRS may challenge all or part of these tax basis increases and tax benefits and no assurances can be made
regarding the availability of these tax basis increases or other tax benefits.
Under the Tax Receivable Agreement, we are required to make cash payments
to LF LLC in respect of 85% of the U.S. federal, state and local income tax savings allocable to us from Landcadia HoldCo and arising
from certain transactions, including (a) certain transactions contemplated under the Purchase Agreement and (b) the exchange
of LF LLC’s Class B membership interests of Landcadia HoldCo (the “HoldCo Class B Units”) for Class A common
stock, as determined on a “with and without” basis, and for an early termination payment by us to LF LLC in the event of a
termination with a majority vote of disinterested directors, a material breach of a material obligation, or a change of control, subject
to certain limitations, including in connection with available cash flow and financing facilities. Payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement
will vary depending upon a number of factors. While many of the factors that will determine the amount of payments that we will make under
the Tax Receivable Agreement are outside of our control, we expect that the payments we will make will be substantial and could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition. Any payments made by us under the Tax Receivable Agreement will reduce the amount
of overall cash flow that might have otherwise been available to us. There can be no assurance that we will be able to fund or finance
our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement upon a change of control or other acceleration event. Furthermore, our obligation to
make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement could make us a less attractive target for an acquisition, particularly in the case of
an acquirer that cannot use some or all of the tax benefits that are the subject of the Tax Receivable Agreement. To the extent that we
are unable to make timely payments for any reason, the unpaid amounts will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid. Under certain
circumstances, non-payment for a specified period may constitute a material breach of a material obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement
and therefore accelerate payments due under the Tax Receivable Agreement, as further described below. The payment obligation under the
Tax Receivable Agreement is an obligation of us and not of Landcadia HoldCo. Actual tax benefits realized by us may differ from the tax
benefits calculated pursuant to the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement.
In certain cases, payments under the Tax Receivable
Agreement may exceed the actual tax benefits we realize or may be accelerated.
Payments under the Tax Receivable
Agreement generally will be based on the tax reporting positions that we determine, and the IRS or another taxing authority may
challenge all or any part of the certain deductions or tax basis increases, as well as other tax positions that we take, and a
court may sustain such a challenge. In the event that any tax benefits initially claimed by us are disallowed, LF LLC will not
be required to reimburse us for any excess payments that may previously have been made under the Tax Receivable Agreement, for
example, due to adjustments resulting from examinations by taxing authorities. Rather, excess payments made to LF LLC will be netted
against any future cash payments otherwise required to be made by us, if any, after the determination of such excess. However,
a challenge to any tax benefits initially claimed by us may not arise for a number of years following the initial time of such
payment or, even if challenged early, such excess cash payment may be greater than the amount of future cash payments that we might
otherwise be required to make under the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement and, as a result, there might not be future cash
payments against which to net. As a result, in certain circumstances, we could make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement
in excess of our actual U.S. federal, state and local income tax savings, which could materially impair our financial condition.
Moreover, the Tax Receivable
Agreement provides that, in certain circumstances, including certain changes of control, a material breach of a material obligation,
and a termination at the election of the majority of our disinterested directors, our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement
generally will accelerate and we generally will be required to make a lump-sum cash payment to LF LLC equal to the present value
of certain future payments that would have otherwise been made under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which lump sum payment would
be based on certain assumptions, including those relating to our future taxable income. The lump-sum payment could be substantial
and could exceed the actual tax benefits that we realize subsequent to such payment.
There may be a material negative
effect on our liquidity if the payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement exceed the actual U.S. federal, state and local income
tax savings that we realize. Furthermore, our obligations to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement could also have the
effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes
of control.