You should rely only on the information contained
in this prospectus and in any free writing prospectus prepared by or on behalf of us and delivered or made available to you. Neither
we nor the underwriters have authorized anyone to provide you with additional or different information. We are offering to sell, and
seeking offers to buy, shares of our common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained
in this prospectus or a free writing prospectus is accurate only as of its date, regardless of its time of delivery or of any sale of
shares of our common stock. Our business, financial condition, operating results, and prospects may have changed since that date, and
neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sale made in connection with this prospectus shall, under any circumstances, create any
implication that there has been no change in our affairs since the date of this prospectus or that the information contained by reference
to this prospectus is correct as of any time after its date.
References to “we,” “us,”
“our” and words of like import refer to us and our subsidiaries, including 4P Therapeutics LLC following our acquisition
of 4P Therapeutics on August 1, 2018, and certain assets of Pocono Coated Products, LLC, on August 31, 2020, unless the context indicates
otherwise. References to 4P Therapeutics or Pocono Coated Products, LLC refer to the business and operations of 4P Therapeutics or Pocono
Coated Products, LLC, as the case may be, prior to acquisition by us unless the context indicates otherwise.
For investors outside the United States: Neither
we nor any of the underwriters have done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus in
any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. Persons outside of the United States who
come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relating to, the offering of the shares
of common stock and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the United States.
The market data and certain other statistical
information used throughout this prospectus are based on independent industry publications, government publications and other published
independent sources. Some data is also based on our good faith estimates. The industry in which we operate is subject to a high degree
of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in the section entitled “Risk Factors.” These
and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in these publications.
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained
elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all the information you should consider before investing in the securities.
However, you should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus.
This summary highlights information contained
elsewhere in this report This summary does not contain all the information you should consider before investing in the securities. However,
you should read the entire report carefully, including the “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere
in this report.
Our primary business is the development of a
portfolio of transdermal pharmaceutical products. Our lead product is our AVERSA™
technology, an abuse deterrent technology that can be added to a new or existing transdermal patch with the goal of deterring the abuse
of certain drugs when delivered transdermally. Our first product under development is our AVERSA fentanyl patch (“AVERSA Fentanyl”)
to provide clinicians and patients with an extended-release, transdermal-delivered fentanyl product for use in managing chronic pain
requiring around the clock opioid therapy, combined with our AVERSA® technology to reduce the abuse and misuse of fentanyl patches.
Following our acquisition of 4P Therapeutics on August 1, 2018, we are planning to develop, and seek FDA approval of, a number of transdermal
pharmaceutical products under development by 4P Therapeutics. With the acquisition of the transdermal, topical, cosmetic and nutraceutical
business of Pocono Coated Products, LLC effective August 31, 2020, we manufacture on a contract basis transdermal, topical, coated and
consumer products.
Selected Risks Associated with our Business
and Operations
Our business is subject to significant risks,
which are disclosed in more detail under “Risk Factors,” which begins on page 5, as a result of which an investment
in our common stock is highly speculative and could result in the loss of your entire investment. Significant risks include, but are
not limited to, the following:
| ● | Our
business could be adversely affected by the effects of health pandemics or epidemics, including
the recent outbreak of COVID-19, which was declared by the World Health Organization as a
global pandemic, and is resulting in travel and other restrictions to reduce the spread of
the disease, including state and local orders across the country, which, among other things,
direct individuals to shelter at their places of residence, direct businesses and governmental
agencies to cease non-essential operations at physical locations, prohibit certain non-essential
gatherings, and order cessation of non-essential travel. The effects of these orders, government-imposed
quarantines and measures we would take, such as work-from-home policies, may negatively impact
productivity, disrupt our business and could delay our clinical programs and timelines, the
magnitude of which will depend, in part, on the length and severity of the restrictions and
other limitations on our ability to conduct our business in the ordinary course. These and
similar, and perhaps more severe, disruptions in our operations could negatively impact our
business, operating results and financial condition. Further, quarantines, shelter-in-place
and similar government orders, or the perception that such orders, shutdowns or other restrictions
on the conduct of business operations could occur, related to COVID-19 or other infectious
diseases could impact personnel at third-party manufacturing facilities in the United States
and other countries, or the availability or cost of materials, which could disrupt our supply
chain. |
|
● |
The FDA regulatory process
may take longer and be more expensive than we anticipate without any assurance that we will obtain FDA approval. |
|
|
|
|
● |
If we are not able to obtain
FDA approval for our lead product, we may not have the resources to develop any other product, and we may not be able to continue
in business. |
|
|
|
|
● |
We may not be able to launch
any products for which we receive FDA marketing approval. |
|
● |
We may not be able to establish
a distribution network for the marketing and sale of any products for which we receive FDA approval. |
|
● |
We may not be able to establish
manufacturing facilities in compliance with FDA good manufacturing practices or to enter into manufacturing agreements for the manufacture
of our products in an FDA approved manufacturing facility. |
|
|
|
|
● |
It will be necessary to
us to enter into a joint venture or other strategic relationship in order to develop, perform clinical testing for, manufacture or
market any of our proposed products. We may not be able to enter into such a relationship, and any relationship may not be successful,
and the other party may have business interests and priorities that are different from ours. |
|
|
|
|
● |
We may not be able to protect
our rights in our intellectual property, and we may be subject to intellectual property litigation which would be expensive and disruptive
of our operations even if we eventually prevail on the merits. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Unanticipated side effects
or other adverse events resulting from the use of our product could require a recall of our products and, even if no recall is required,
our reputation could be impaired by side effects. |
|
|
|
|
● |
We may fail to comply with
all applicable laws and regulations relating to our product. We may have to change or adapt our operations in the event of changes
in national, regional and local government regulations, taxation, controls and political and economic developments that affect our
products and the market for our products; |
|
|
|
|
● |
We may be unable to accurately
estimate anticipated expenses, capital requirements and needs for additional financing; |
|
|
|
|
● |
The terms of our recent
financing, including the antidilution provisions of the warrants, may impair our ability to raise funds for our operations during
the term of the warrants. |
Our Organization
We are a Nevada corporation, incorporated on
January 4, 2016. In January 2016, we acquired Nutriband Ltd, an Irish company which was formed by Gareth Sheridan, our chief executive
officer, in 2012 to enter the health and wellness market by marketing transdermal patches. Our corporate headquarters are located at
121 S. Orange Ave. Suite 1500, Orlando, Florida 32765, telephone (407) 377-6695. Our website is www.nutriband.com. Information
contained on or available through our website or any other website does not constitute a portion of this prospectus.
Recent Financings
Pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (“SPA”),
dated December 7, 2020, with the Company, BPM Inno Ltd., Kiryat, Israel, purchased 81,395 shares of common stock at a price of $8.60
per share, or $700,000. The transaction was completed at a closing on February 26, 2021.
On March 22, 2020, the Company issued in a private
placement 46,828 units at a price of $11 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share
of common stock at an exercise price of $14 per share. The warrants expire April 30, 2023. The Company issued a total of 46,828 shares
of common stock and warrants to purchase 46,828 shares of common stock. The Company received proceeds of $515,113.
In March 2020, a minority stockholder who had
previously made loans of $215,000, made an additional loan to the Company in the amount of $60,000, increasing the total loans from the
stockholder to $275,000. See Note 9 in the attached Financial Statements. On March 27, 2020, the Company issued 25,000 shares upon conversion
of the notes in the principal balance of $275,000.
On March 25, 2020, the Company prepaid the convertible
notes in the principal amount of $270,000 from the proceeds of the private placement. The total payments, including the prepayment penalty
and accrued interest, was $345,565. As a result of the payment of the notes, the derivative liability, which was $928,774 at January
31, 2020, was reduced to zero. As a result of the terms of the private placement, the warrants to purchase 50,000 shares at lesser of
(a) $20.90 or (b) if the Company completes a private offering, 110% of the initial offering price of the common stock in the public offering,
became a warrant to purchase 95,000 shares at $11 per share, subject to adjustment pursuant to the antidilution provisions of the warrant.
See Notes 6 and 10 in the attached Financial Statements.
On October 30, 2019, we entered into a securities
purchase agreement with two investors pursuant to which we issued to the investor for $250,000 (i) 6% one-year convertible notes in the
principal amount of $270,000 and (ii) three-year warrant to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to the
lesser of (i) $20.90 or (ii) if we complete this offering, 110% of the initial public offering price of the common stock in this offering,
which, based on an initial public offering price of the common stock in this offering of $12.00 per share, would be $13.20 per share.
The net proceeds from this financing, of approximately $203,000, were used for working capital. The notes are convertible at a conversion
price equal to the lesser of (i) the per share price of our common stock offered hereby or (ii) the variable conversion price, which
is defined as 70% of the lowest trading price of the common stock during the 20 trading days preceding the date of conversion. The conversion
price and the percentage of the trading price is subject to downward adjustment in the event we fail to comply with its obligations under
the note.
On October 5, 2021, the Company consummated a
public offering of 1,056,000 Units, each Unit consisting of one share of common stock and a Warrant to purchase one share of common stock,
at a price of $6.25 per Unit. Each Warrant is immediately exercisable, will entitle the holder to purchase one share of common stock
at an exercise price of $7.50 and will expire five (5) years from the date of issuance. The underwriters’ over-allotment option
was exercised for 158,400 warrants to purchase shares of common stock The shares of common stock and Warrants are separately transferred
immediately upon issuance.
Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company
As a company with less than $1.07 billion in
revenue during our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business
Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of reduced reporting requirements that are otherwise
generally applicable to public companies, although as a smaller reporting company we are taking advantage of reduced reporting requirements.
In particular, as an emerging growth company, we:
|
● |
may present only two years
of audited financial statements and related disclosure under Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations, or MD&A; |
|
|
|
|
● |
are not required to provide
a detailed narrative disclosure discussing our compensation principles, objectives and elements and analyzing how those elements
fit with our principles and objectives, which is commonly referred to as “compensation discussion and analysis”; |
|
|
|
|
● |
are not required to obtain
an attestation and report from our auditors on our management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting
pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; |
|
|
|
|
● |
are not required to obtain
a non-binding advisory vote from our stockholders on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements (commonly referred to
as the “say-on-pay,” “say-on frequency” and “say-on-golden-parachute” votes); |
|
|
|
|
● |
are exempt from certain
executive compensation disclosure provisions requiring a pay-for-performance graph and chief executive officer pay ratio disclosure; |
|
|
|
|
● |
will not be required to
conduct an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting until two years after the effective date of the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part. |
We intend to take advantage of all of these reduced
reporting requirements and exemptions. However, since we have already adopted certain new or revised accounting standards under §107
of the JOBS Act, we are not able to take advantage of the delayed phase in of the new or revised accounting standards.
Under the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of
the above-described reduced reporting requirements and exemptions for up to five years after our initial sale of common equity pursuant
to a registration statement declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or such earlier time that we no longer meet
the definition of an emerging growth company. The JOBS Act provides that we would cease to be an “emerging growth company”
if we have more than $1.07 billion in annual revenues (as adjusted for inflation), have more than $700 million in market value of our
common stock held by non-affiliates, or issue more than $1 billion in principal amount of non-convertible debt over a three-year period.
Under current Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, rules, however, we will continue to qualify as a “smaller reporting company”
for so long as we have either (i) a public float (i.e., the market value of common equity held by non-affiliates) of less than $250 million
as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (ii) annual revenues of less than $100 million and
a public float of less than $700 million.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
DATA
The following information as of January 31, 2022
and 2021, and for years then ended, has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements which appear elsewhere in this
prospectus. The following information as of and for the three months ended April 30, 2022 and 2021, has been derived from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements which appear elsewhere in this prospectus.
Statement of Operations Information:
|
|
Three Months Ended
April 30, |
|
|
Year Ended
January 31, |
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
477,922 |
|
|
$ |
433,488 |
|
|
$ |
1,422,154 |
|
|
$ |
943,702 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
277,436 |
|
|
|
195,610 |
|
|
|
917,844 |
|
|
|
627,378 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
768,511 |
|
|
|
551,942 |
|
|
|
4,022,824 |
|
|
|
2,912,269 |
|
Net (loss) |
|
|
(689,989 |
) |
|
|
(315,057 |
) |
|
|
(6.372,715 |
) |
|
|
(2,932,828 |
) |
Net (loss) per share of common stock (basic and
diluted) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.94 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding (basic
and diluted) |
|
|
7,871,356 |
|
|
|
6,329,438 |
|
|
|
6,799,624 |
|
|
|
5,770,944 |
|
Balance Sheet Information:
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
4,641,912 |
|
|
$ |
5,465,368 |
|
|
$ |
314,188 |
|
Working capital surplus (deficiency) |
|
|
3,918,855 |
|
|
|
4,686,112 |
|
|
|
(2,254,418 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(18,701,220 |
) |
|
|
(18,011,231 |
) |
|
|
(11,835,105 |
) |
Stockholders’ equity |
|
|
11,080,100 |
|
|
|
11,859,285 |
|
|
|
7,111,946 |
|
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves
a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below together with all of the other information included in
this prospectus before making an investment decision with regard to our securities. The statements contained in this prospectus include
forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
set forth in or implied by forward-looking statements. The risks set forth below are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and
uncertainties may exist that could also adversely affect our business, prospects or operations. If any of the following risks actually
occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock
could decline, and you may lose all or a significant part of your investment.
Risks Concerning our Business
Because we are an early-stage company with
minimal revenue and a history of losses and we expect to continue to incur substantial losses for the foreseeable future, we cannot assure
you that we can or will be able to operate profitably.
During the year ended January 31, 2022, we generated
revenues of $1,422,154, a loss of $6,372,715 and a negative cash flow from operations of $2,809,223. As of January 31, 2022, we had a
working capital surplus of $4,686,112, as compared with a working capital deficit of $2,882,794 as of January 31, 2021. We are subject
to the risks common to start-up, pre-revenue enterprises, including, among other factors, undercapitalization, cash shortages, limitations
with respect to personnel, financial and other resources and lack of revenues. Drug development companies typically incur substantial
losses during the product development and FDA testing phase of the business and do not generate revenues until after the drug has received
FDA approval, which cannot be assured, and until the company has started to sell the product. We can give no assurance that we can or
will ever be successful in achieving profitability and the likelihood of our success must be considered in light of our early stage of
operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to operate profitably or generate positive cash flow. If we cannot achieve profitability,
we may be forced to cease operations and you may suffer a total loss of your investment.
The Russian/Belarus-Ukrainian conflict
may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In February 2022, the
Russian Federation and Belarus commenced a military action with the country of Ukraine. The specific impact on our financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows is not determinable as of the date hereof. However, to the extent that such military action spreads
to other countries, intensifies, or otherwise remains active, such conflict could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows. To date, this conflict is predicted to have a destabilizing effect on the world’s economy,
resulting in higher energy prices and inflationary pressures generally in the world’s economy, as well as possible supply chain
restraints, which will have negative effects on the world’s economy generally and to our ongoing operations specifically. The duration
of this conflict, as well as its effects on the world economy are not known at this point. These factors may lead to a lack of certainty
or other changes in the capital markets and limit or reduce our potential for raising the additional capital that we will require to
execute our business plan in a timely fashion.
Our business will
be likely be adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic and the response to the
pandemic will affect our business in a number of ways, including, but are not limited to, the following:
| ● | Our
ability to raise financing for our operations and to enter into a joint venture agreement
may be affected by both the willingness and ability of potential financing sources and potential
joint venture partners to invest in an undercapitalized business, particularly at a time
when the potential financing source or joint venture partner may need to devote its resources
to existing portfolio companies or joint ventures which may be in need of financing. |
| ● | The
decision by investors who would invest in early-stage pharmaceutical companies to limit their
financing efforts to companies that are dealing with products or services related to COVID-19
diagnosis or treatment. |
| ● | The
effect of recent stock market decline on the willingness of investors to make an investment
in our securities. |
Because we do not have a product we can
market in the United States, we cannot predict when or whether we will operate profitably.
Our lead product, which is our abuse deterrent
fentanyl transdermal system, is currently in development and is not yet approved by the FDA in the United States or by any other regulatory
agency in any other country. We do not have any product that we can market in the United States. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties
associated with product development, we cannot assure you that we will be able to develop and market any products or achieve or attain
profitability. If we are able to obtain financing for our operations, we expect that we will incur substantial expenses as we continue
with our product development programs and clinical trials. Further, if we are required by applicable regulatory authorities, including
the FDA as well as the comparable regulatory agencies in other countries in which we may seek to market product, to perform studies in
addition to those we currently anticipate, our expenses will increase beyond expectations and the timing of any potential product approval
may be delayed. As a result, we expect to continue to incur substantial losses and negative cash flow for the foreseeable future.
A number of factors, including, but not limited to the following,
may affect our ability to develop our business and operate profitably:
|
● |
our ability to obtain necessary
funding to develop our proposed products; |
|
● |
the success of clinical
trials for our products; |
|
● |
our ability to obtain FDA
approval for us to market any proposed product in our pipeline in the United States; |
|
● |
any delays in regulatory
review and approval of product in development; |
|
● |
if we obtain FDA approval
to market our product, our ability to establish manufacturing and distribution operations or entering into manufacturing and distribution
agreements with qualified third parties; |
|
● |
market acceptance of our
products; |
|
● |
our ability to establish
an effective sales and marketing infrastructure; |
|
● |
our ability to protect
our intellectual property; |
|
● |
competition from existing
products or new products that may emerge; |
|
● |
the ability to commercialize
our products; |
|
● |
potential product liability
claims and adverse events; |
|
● |
our ability to adequately
support future growth; and |
|
● |
our ability to attract
and retain key personnel to manage our business effectively. |
Our failure to develop our abuse deterrent
fentanyl transdermal system will impair our ability to continue in business.
Our lead product is our abuse deterrent fentanyl
transdermal system, and we are devoting our resources primarily to developing this product to enable us to obtain FDA approval and to
market the product. If we are not able to obtain necessary financing to develop, obtain FDA marketing approval and market this product
successfully, we may not have the resources to develop additional products, and we may not be able to continue in business.
Before we can market in the United States
any product which is classified by the FDA as a drug, we must obtain FDA marketing approval.
Our proposed transdermal products are drug-device
combinations that are considered by the FDA to be drugs, which require approval by the FDA. In order to obtain FDA approval, it is necessary
to conduct a series of preclinical and clinical tests to confirm that the product is safe and effective. Even though the medication that
is being delivered through our transdermal patch may have already received FDA approval, because we are changing the dosage form or route
of administration, we will need to complete, to the FDA’s satisfaction, all of the studies required to demonstrate safety and efficacy.
At any point, the FDA could ask us to perform additional tests or to refine and redo a test that we had previously completed. The process
of obtaining FDA approval could take many years, with no assurance that the FDA will approve the product. The FDA also will need to approve
the manufacturing process and the manufacturing facility.
We may need to rely on a contract research organization to conduct
our preclinical and clinical trials.
Although we believe that we, through 4P Therapeutics,
have the capabilities to conduct preclinical studies and early- stage clinical studies in house, we may need to rely on third party contract
research organizations to conduct our pivotal preclinical and clinical trials. Our failure or the failure of the contract research organization
to conduct the trials in compliance with FDA regulations could possibly derail our obtaining FDA approval and could require us to redo
any preclinical or clinical trials which we or the contract research organization administered.
We may encounter delays in completing clinical
trials, which would increase our costs and delay market entry.
We may experience delays in completing the clinical
trials necessary for FDA approval. These delays may result from a number of factors which could prevent us from starting the trial on
time or completing the study in a timely manner, which may include factors out of our control. Since we may need to rely on third parties
for supplying us with the drug and transdermal patches used in the trials, there may be various reasons for us to experience a delay
in obtaining the clinical materials required to start each clinical trial, which may include factors out of our control. Clinical trials
can be delayed or terminated for a number of reasons, including delay or failure to:
|
● |
obtain necessary financing; |
|
● |
obtain regulatory approval
to commence a trial; |
|
● |
reach agreement on acceptable
terms with prospective contract research organizations, investigators and clinical trial sites, the terms of which may be subject
to extensive negotiation and vary significantly among different research organizations and trial sites; |
|
● |
obtain institutional review
board approval at each site; |
|
● |
enlist suitable patients
to participate in a trial; |
|
● |
have patients complete
a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up; |
|
● |
ensure clinical sites observe
trial protocol or continue to participate in a trial; |
|
● |
address any patient safety
concerns that arise during the course of a trial; |
|
● |
address any conflicts with
new or existing laws or regulations; |
|
● |
add a sufficient number
of clinical trial sites; or |
|
● |
manufacture sufficient
quantities of the product candidate for use in clinical trials. |
Patient enrollment is also a significant factor
in the timely completion of clinical trials and is affected by many factors, including the size and nature of the patient population,
the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the trial, the design of the clinical trial, competing clinical
trials and clinicians’ and patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages of the drug being studied in relation to
available alternatives, including any new drugs or treatments that may be approved for the indications we are investigating.
We may also encounter delays if a clinical trial
is suspended or terminated by us, by the independent review boards of the institutions in which such trials are being conducted, by the
trial’s data safety monitoring board, or by the FDA. Such authorities may suspend or terminate one or more of our clinical trials
due to a number of factors, including our failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with relevant regulatory requirements or
clinical protocols, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA resulting in the imposition of a clinical hold,
unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug, changes in governmental regulations
or administrative actions or lack of adequate funding to continue the clinical trial.
If we experience delays in carrying out or completing
clinical trials for any product candidates, the commercial prospects of our product candidates may be harmed, and our ability to generate
revenues from any of these product candidates will be delayed. In addition, any delays in completing our clinical trials will increase
our costs, slow down the product development and approval process and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate revenues.
Any of these occurrences may significantly harm our business and financial condition. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or
lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of
our product candidates.
Our ability to finance our operations and
generate revenues depends on the clinical and commercial success of our abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system and our other related
product candidates and failure to achieve such success will negatively impact our business.
Our prospects, including our ability to finance
our operations and generate revenues, depend on the successful development, regulatory approval and commercialization of our abuse deterrent
fentanyl transdermal system, which itself requires substantial financing, as well as our other product candidates. The clinical and commercial
success of our product candidates depends on a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:
|
● |
the FDA’s acceptance
of our parameters for regulatory approval relating to our product candidates, including our proposed indications, primary endpoint
assessments, primary endpoint measurements and regulatory pathways; |
|
● |
the FDA’s acceptance
of the number, design, size, conduct and implementation of our clinical trials, our trial protocols and the interpretation of data
from preclinical studies or clinical trials; |
|
● |
the FDA’s acceptance
of the sufficiency of the data we collect from our preclinical studies and pivotal clinical trials to support the submission of a
New Drug Application, known as an NDA, without requiring additional preclinical or clinical trials; |
|
● |
the FDA’s acceptance
of our abuse deterrent labelling relating to our products, including our abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system; |
|
● |
when we submit our NDA
upon completion of our clinical trials, the FDA’s willingness to schedule an advisory committee meeting, if applicable, in
a timely manner to evaluate and decide on the approval of our NDA; |
|
● |
the recommendation of the
FDA’s advisory committee, if applicable, to approve our application without limiting the approved labelling, specifications,
distribution or use of the products, or imposing other restrictions; |
|
● |
our ability to satisfy
any issued raised by the FDA in response to our test data; |
|
● |
the FDA’s satisfaction
with the safety and efficacy of our product candidates; |
|
● |
the prevalence and severity
of adverse events associated with our product candidates; |
|
● |
the timely and satisfactory
performance by third party contractors of their obligations in relation to our clinical trials; |
|
● |
if we receive FDA approval,
our success in educating physicians and patients about the benefits, administration and use our product candidates; |
|
● |
our ability to raise additional
capital on acceptable terms in order to achieve conduct the necessary clinical trials; |
|
● |
the availability, perceived
advantages and relative cost of alternative and competing treatments; |
|
● |
the effectiveness of our
marketing, sales and distribution strategy and operations; |
|
● |
our ability to develop,
validate and maintain a commercially viable manufacturing process that is compliant with current good manufacturing practices; |
|
● |
our ability to obtain,
protect and enforce our intellectual property rights; |
|
● |
our ability to bring an
action timely for patent infringement arising out of the filing of ANDAs by generic companies seeking approval to market generic
versions of our products, if applicable, before the expiry of our patents; and |
|
● |
our ability to avoid third
party claims of patent infringement or intellectual property violations. |
If we fail to achieve these objectives or to
overcome the challenges presented above, many of which are beyond our control, in a timely manner, we could experience significant delays
or an inability to successfully commercialize our product candidates. Accordingly, even if we obtain FDA approval to market our products,
we may not be able to generate sufficient revenues through the sale of our products to enable us to continue our business.
Since we do not have commercial manufacturing
capability, if we are unable to establish manufacturing facilities, we may have to enter into a manufacturing agreement with a manufacturer
that has been approved by the FDA.
Any commercial manufacturer of our products and
the manufacturing facilities where we make our commercial products will be subject to FDA inspection. Part of the process of seeking
FDA approval to market our products is the FDA’s approval of the manufacturing process and facility. Although we may establish
our own manufacturing facilities, the establishment of a manufacturing facility is very costly, and, unless we obtain funding for that
purpose, it would be necessary for us to engage a contract manufacturer who has experience is manufacturing FDA-approved transdermal
products. By relying on a contract manufacturer, we will be dependent upon the manufacturer, whose interests may be different from ours.
Any contract manufacturer will be responsible for product quality and for meeting regulatory requirements. If the manufacturer does not
meet our quality standards and delivers products that do not meet our specifications, we may both incur liability for breach of our warranty
to our customer, as well as liability for any adverse events, including death, that may result from the use, abuse or accidental misuse
of the product. Regardless of whether we are able to make a claim against the contract manufacturer, our reputation may be harmed and
we may lose business as a result. Further, the contract manufacturer may have other customers and may allocate its resources based on
the contract manufacturer’s interest rather than our interest. Furthermore, we may not be able to assure ourselves that we will
get favorable pricing.
If we or any third-party manufacturer fails
to comply with FDA current good manufacturing practices, we may not be able to sell our products until and unless the manufacture becomes
compliant.
All FDA approved drugs, including our proposed
transdermal products, must be manufactured in accordance with good manufacturing practices. All manufacturing facilities are inspected
by the FDA as a matter of routine inspection or for a specific cause. If a manufacturer fails to comply with all applicable regulations,
the FDA can prohibit us from distributing products manufactured in those facilities, whether they are a contract manufacturer or own
facility. Failure to be in compliance with good manufacturing practices could result in the FDA closing the facilities or limiting our
use of the facilities.
If the FDA implements Risk Evaluation and
Mitigation Strategies policies for any of our proposed products, we will need to comply with such policies before we can obtain FDA approval
or the product.
The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act
of 2007 gave FDA the authority to require a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) from manufacturers to ensure that the benefits
of a drug or biological product outweigh its risks. If one of our proposed product candidates does receive regulatory approval, the approval
may be limited to specific conditions and dosages or the indications for use may otherwise be limited, which could restrict the commercial
value of the product. The FDA may require a REMS, which can include a medication guide, patient package insert, a communication plan,
elements to assure safe use and implementation system, and include a timetable for assessment of the REMS. Further, the FDA may require
that certain contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling and may require testing and surveillance
programs to monitor the safety of approved products that have been commercialized. In addition, the FDA may require post-approval testing
which involves clinical trials designed to further assess a drug product’s safety and effectiveness after the NDA.
Depending on the extent of the REMS requirements,
any U.S. launch may be delayed, the costs to commercialize may increase substantially and the potential commercial market could be restricted.
Furthermore, risks that are not adequately addressed through the proposed REMS program may also prevent or delay its approval for commercialization.
Our products will continue to be subject to FDA review after
FDA approval is given.
Discovery of previously unknown problems with
our products or unanticipated problems with the manufacturing processes and facilities, even after FDA and other regulatory approvals
of the product for commercial sale, may result in the imposition of significant restrictions, including withdrawal of the product from
the market.
The FDA and other regulatory agencies continue
to review products even after the products receive agency approval. If and when the FDA approves one of our products, its manufacture
and marketing will be subject to ongoing regulation, which could include compliance with current good manufacturing practices, adverse
event reporting requirements and general prohibitions against promoting products for unapproved or “off-label” uses. We are
also subject to inspection and market surveillance by the FDA for compliance with these and other requirements. Any enforcement action
resulting from the failure, even by inadvertence, to comply with these requirements could affect the manufacture and marketing of our
products. In addition, the FDA or other regulatory agencies could withdraw a previously approved product from the market upon receipt
of newly discovered information. The FDA or another regulatory agency could also require us to conduct additional, and potentially expensive,
studies in areas outside our approved indicated uses.
We must continually monitor the safety
of our products once approved and marketed for potential adverse events which could jeopardize our ability to continue marketing the
products.
As with all medical products, the use of our
products could sometimes produce undesirable side effects or adverse reactions or events (referred to cumulatively as adverse events).
For the most part, we expect these adverse events to be known and occur at some predicted frequency based on our experience in the clinical
development program. When adverse events are reported to us, we are required to investigate each event and the circumstances surrounding
it to determine whether it was caused by our product and whether a previously unrecognized safety issue exists. We will also be required
to periodically report summaries of these events to the applicable regulatory authorities. If the adverse effects are significant, we
may be required to recall our product. We cannot assure you that our transdermal products will not cause skin irritation or other adverse
events. Our ability to market our products may be impaired by unanticipated adverse events and any recall of our product. Because we
are an early-stage company, our reputation, and our ability to market products, could be affected more severely than a major pharmaceutical
company.
In addition, the use of our products could be
associated with serious and unexpected adverse events, or with less serious reactions at a greater than expected frequency. Such issues
may arise when our products are used in critically ill or otherwise compromised patient populations. When unexpected events are reported
to us, we are required to make a thorough investigation to determine causality and the implications for product safety. These events
must also be specifically reported to the applicable regulatory authorities. If our evaluation concludes, or regulatory authorities perceive,
that there is an unreasonable risk associated with the product, we would be obligated to withdraw the impacted lot(s) of that product
or recall the product and discontinue marketing until all problems are satisfactorily resolved. Furthermore, an unexpected adverse event
of a new product could be recognized only after extensive use of the product, which could expose us to product liability risks, enforcement
action by regulatory authorities and damage to our reputation and public image.
A serious adverse finding concerning the risk
of any of our products by any regulatory authority could adversely affect our reputation, business and financial results.
If we obtain FDA approval to market our
products, we expect to spend considerable time and money complying with federal and state laws and regulations governing their sale,
and, if we are unable to fully comply with such laws and regulations, we could face substantial penalties.
Health care providers, physicians and others
will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of our proposed products. Further, if we use third-party sales and marketing
providers, they may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other health care laws and regulations that may constrain the
business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we market, sell and distribute our products. Applicable federal and
state health care laws and regulations are expected to include, but not be limited to, the following:
| ● | The
federal anti-kickback statute is a criminal statute that makes it a felony for individuals
or entities knowingly and willfully to offer or pay, or to solicit or receive, direct or
indirect remuneration, in order to induce the purchase, order, lease, or recommending of
items or services, or the referral of patients for services, that are reimbursed under a
federal health care program, including Medicare and Medicaid; |
| ● | The
federal False Claims Act imposes liability on any person who knowingly submits, or causes
another person or entity to submit, a false claim for payment of government funds. Penalties
include three times the government’s damages plus civil penalties of $5,500 to $11,000
per false claim. In addition, the False Claims Act permits a person with knowledge of fraud,
referred to as a qui tam plaintiff, to file a lawsuit on behalf of the government against
the person or business that committed the fraud, and, if the action is successful, the qui
tam plaintiff is rewarded with a percentage of the recovery; |
| ● | Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, known as HIPAA, imposes obligations, including
mandatory contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission
of individually identifiable health information; |
| ● | The
Social Security Act contains numerous provisions allowing the imposition of a civil money
penalty, a monetary assessment, exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, or some
combination of these penalties; and |
| ● | Many
states have analogous state laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims
laws. In some cases, these state laws impose more strict requirements than the federal laws.
Some state laws also require pharmaceutical companies to comply with certain price reporting
and other compliance requirements. |
Our failure to comply with any of these federal
and state health care laws and regulations, or health care laws in foreign jurisdictions, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, result of operations and cash flows.
Before we can market our products outside
of the United States, we will need to obtain regulatory approval in each country in which we propose to sell our products.
In order to market and sell our products in jurisdictions
other than the United States, we must obtain separate marketing approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements.
The regulatory approval process outside the United States generally includes all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA and can involve
additional testing.
In addition, in many countries worldwide, it
is required that the product be approved for reimbursement before the product can be approved for sale in that country. We may not obtain
approvals from regulatory authorities outside the United States on a timely basis, if at all. Even if we were to receive approval in
the United States, approval by the FDA for marketing in the United States does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other
countries. Similarly, approval by one regulatory authority outside the United States would not ensure approval by regulatory authorities
in other countries. We may not be able to file for marketing approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products
in any market. If we are unable to obtain approval of our product candidates by regulatory authorities in foreign jurisdictions, the
commercial prospects of those product candidates may be significantly diminished and our business prospects could be impaired.
Outside the United States, particularly in member
states of the European Union, the pricing of prescription drugs is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations
or the successful completion of health technology assessment procedures with governmental authorities can take considerable time after
receipt of marketing approval for a product. In addition, there can be considerable pressure by governments and other stakeholders on
prices and reimbursement levels, including as part of cost containment measures. Certain countries allow companies to fix their own prices
for medicines but monitor the pricing.
In addition to regulations in the United States,
if we market outside of the United States, we will be subject to a variety of regulations governing, among other things, clinical trials
and any commercial sales and distribution of our products. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain the requisite
approvals from regulatory authorities in foreign countries prior to the commencement of clinical trials or marketing of the product in
those countries.
If we do not have sufficient product liability
insurance, we may be subject to claims that are in excess of our net worth.
Before we market any pharmaceutical product,
we will need to purchase significant product liability insurance. However, in the event of major claims from the use of our products,
it is possible that our product liability insurance will not be sufficient to cover claims against us. We cannot assure you that we will
not face liability arising out of the use of our products which is significantly in excess of the limits of our product liability insurance.
In such event, if we do not have the funds or access to the funds necessary to satisfy such liability, we may be unable to continue in
business.
Because some of the patches we are developing,
such as our abuse deterrent fentanyl patch, have potential severe side effects, we may face liability in the event patients suffer serious,
possibly life-threatening, side effects from our products.
Fentanyl patches have known side effects and
may cause serious or life-threatening breathing problems due to opioid-induced respiratory depression. In addition, taking certain medications
with fentanyl may increase the risk of serious or life-threatening breathing problems, sedation or coma. Because of the seriousness of
the side effects, fentanyl patches should only be used in accordance labelling approved by the FDA or by the applicable regulatory authorities
outside of the United States. Fentanyl patches are only indicated for the treatment of people who are tolerant to opioid medications
because they have taken this type of medication for at least one week and should not be used to treat mild or moderate pain, short-term
pain, pain after an operation or medical or dental procedure, or pain that can be controlled by medication that is taken on an as-needed
basis. Although we will include all warnings on the packaging that are required by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, claims
may be made against us in the event that death or serious side effects result from the use of our abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal
system, even if prescribed for a patient for whom fentanyl patches should not be prescribed. We cannot assure you that we will not face
significant liability as a result of such side effects and we may not have sufficient product liability insurance to cover any damages
that may be assessed against us.
Because of our lack of funds, we may have
to enter into a joint venture or strategic relationship or licensing agreement with a third party to develop and seek to obtain FDA approval
of our potential products.
Our present efforts are directed to developing
and seeking FDA approval for our pipeline of transdermal pharmaceutical products including our lead product, the abuse deterrent fentanyl
transdermal system. The development of pharmaceutical products is very expensive with no assurance of obtaining FDA approval. Because
of the costs involved, we may need to enter into a joint venture or strategic alliance or licensing or similar agreement with a third
party to bring our products to market, in which event we would have to give up a significant percentage of the equity in or rights to
the product and require the other party to provide the necessary financing and personnel and to take a significant role in making the
decisions relating to the development, testing, marketing and manufacturing of the product. The third party may have interests which
are different from, and possibly in conflict with, our own. If we are unable to attract competent parties to distribute and market any
product which we may develop, or if such parties’ efforts are inadequate, we will not be able to implement our business strategy
and may have to cease operations. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in entering into joint ventures or other strategic
relationships or that any relationship into which we may enter will develop a marketable product or that we will generate any revenue
or net income from such a venture.
We may decide not to continue developing
or commercializing any products at any time during development or after approval, which would reduce or eliminate our potential return
on investment for those product candidates.
We may decide to discontinue the development
of our abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system or any other product in our pipeline or not to continue to commercialize any potential
product for a variety of reasons, such as the appearance of new technologies that make our product less commercially viable, an increase
in competition, changes in or failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, changes in the regulatory or public policy environment,
the discovery of unforeseen side effects during clinical development or after the approved product has been marketed or the occurrence
of adverse events at a rate or severity level that is greater than experienced in prior clinical trials. If we discontinue a program
in which we have invested significant resources, we will not receive any return on our investment.
If any of our potential products are approved
for marketing but fail to achieve the broad degree of physician or market acceptance necessary for commercial success, our operating
results and financial condition will be adversely affected.
If any of the products in our pipeline receives
FDA approval thereby allowing us to market the product in the United States, it will be necessary for us to generate acceptance of our
product for the indications covered by the FDA approval. In order to generate acceptance in the marketplace, we will need to demonstrate
to physicians, patients and payors that our product provides a distinct advantage or better outcome at a price that reflects the value
of our product as compared with existing products. We will need to develop and implement a marketing program directed at both physicians
and the general public. Since we do not presently have the resources necessary to develop or implement an in-house marketing program
and we may not have the funds to do so if and when we obtain FDA approval to market our product, we will need to establish a distribution
network though license and distribution agreements with third parties who have the capability to market our product to physicians, and
we will be dependent upon the ability of these third parties to market our products effectively. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to negotiate license and distribution agreements with terms that are acceptable to us. Since we do not have an established track
record and our product pipeline is relatively small, we may be at a disadvantage in negotiating the terms of license and distribution
agreements. Further, we may have little control over the development and implementation of our licensee’s marketing program, and
our licensees may have interests that are inconsistent with ours with respect to the allocation of resources and implementation of the
marketing program. We cannot assure you that a marketing program for any of our products can or will be implemented effectively or that
we will be successful in developing physician and emergency service acceptance of our products.
If we seek to market any products in our
pipeline in countries other than the United States, we will need to comply with the regulations of each country in which we seek to market
our products.
None of our pharmaceutical products are currently
approved for sale by any government authority in any jurisdiction. If we fail to comply with regulatory requirements in any market we
decide to enter, or to obtain and maintain required approvals, or if regulatory approvals in the relevant markets are delayed, our target
market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our products will be harmed. Marketing approval in one
jurisdiction, including the United States, does not ensure marketing approval in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining marketing
approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect on the regulatory process in others. Failure to obtain a marketing approval in
countries in which we seek to market our products or any delay or setback in obtaining such approval would impair our ability to develop
foreign markets for any of our products.
The drug delivery industry is subject to
rapid technological change and, our failure to keep up with technological developments may impair our ability to market our products.
Our products use technology which we developed
for the transdermal delivery of drugs. The field of drug delivery is subject to rapid technological changes. Our future success will
depend upon our ability to keep abreast of the latest developments in the industry and to keep pace with advances in technology and changing
customer requirements. If we cannot keep pace with such changes and advances, our proposed products could be rendered obsolete, which
would result in our having to cease its operations.
If we obtain FDA approval, we will face
significant competition from better known and better capitalized companies.
If we obtain FDA approval for any of our products,
we expect to face significant competition from existing companies, which are better known and already have developed relationships with
physicians within the healthcare system. Any product we may develop will compete with existing medications performing the same medicinal
functions, which may include transdermal patches. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully. In addition, even
if we are able to commercialize our product candidates, we may not be able to price them competitively with current standard of care
products or their price may drop considerably due to factors outside our control. If this happens or the price of materials and manufacture
increases dramatically, our ability to continue to operate our business would be materially harmed and we may be unable to commercialize
any products successfully. In addition, other pharmaceutical companies may be engaged in developing, patenting, manufacturing and marketing
products that compete with those that we are developing. These potential competitors may include large and experienced companies that
enjoy significant competitive advantages over us, such as greater financial, research and development, manufacturing, personnel and marketing
resources, greater brand recognition and more experience and expertise in obtaining marketing approvals from the FDA and foreign regulatory
authorities.
Healthcare reforms by governmental authorities,
court decisions affecting health care policies and related reductions in pharmaceutical pricing, reimbursement and coverage by third-party
payors may adversely affect our business.
We expect the healthcare industry to face increased
limitations on reimbursement, rebates and other payments as a result of healthcare reform, which could adversely affect third-party coverage
of our proposed products and how much or under what circumstances healthcare providers will prescribe or administer our products, if
approved.
In both the U.S. and other countries, sales of
our products, if approved for marketing, will depend in part upon the availability of reimbursement from third-party payors, which include
governmental authorities, managed care organizations and other private health insurers. Third-party payors are increasingly challenging
the price and examining the cost effectiveness of medical products and services.
Increasing expenditures for healthcare have been
the subject of considerable public attention in the United States. Both private and government entities are seeking ways to reduce or
contain healthcare costs. Numerous proposals that would effect changes in the United States healthcare system have been introduced or
proposed in Congress and in some state legislatures, including reducing reimbursement for prescription products and reducing the levels
at which consumers and healthcare providers are reimbursed for purchases of pharmaceutical products.
Cost reduction initiatives and changes in coverage
implemented through legislation or regulation could decrease utilization of and reimbursement for any approved products, which in turn
would affect the price we can receive for those products. Any reduction in reimbursement that results from federal legislation or regulation
may also result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors, since private payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and
payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates.
Significant developments that may adversely affect
pricing in the United States include the enactment of federal healthcare reform laws and regulations, including the Affordable Care Act,
or ACA, which is popularly known as Obamacare, and the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. A
recent district court decision which struck down Obamacare, if upheld, could have a material adverse effect upon reimbursement and payment
for products such as our proposed products. Changes to the healthcare system enacted as part of any healthcare reform in the United States,
as well as the increased purchasing power of entities that negotiate on behalf of Medicare, Medicaid, and private sector beneficiaries,
may result in increased pricing pressure by influencing, for instance, the reimbursement policies of third-party payors. Regulatory changes
which have the effect of decreasing the use of opioids has resulted in a decrease in the size of the market for opioid products, including
fentanyl, could impact the market for our abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system or any other opioid-based transdermal product we
may develop.
It is difficult and costly to protect our
proprietary rights, and we may not be able to ensure their protection.
Our commercial success will depend in part on
obtaining and maintaining patent protection and trade secret protection for our technology which is incorporated in our products as well
as successfully defending these patents against third-party challenges, should any be brought. 4P Therapeutics originally filed an international
patent application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty for worldwide prosecution of the abuse deterrent transdermal technology intellectual
property used in our lead product, the abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system.
The AVERSA abuse deterrent technology utilized
in our AVERSA product pipeline is covered by an international intellectual property portfolio with patents issued in 44 countries including
the United States, Europe, Japan, Korea, Russia, Mexico, and Australia. Patent prosecution is still pending in Canada and China. These
patents provide patent coverage to 2035. We continue to build on our proprietary positions in the United States and internationally for
our product candidates AVERSA Fentanyl, AVERSA buprenorphine and AVERSA methylphenidate as well as other products and technology that
we may have in development. Our policy is to pursue, maintain and defend patent rights developed internally or acquired externally and
to protect the technology, inventions and improvements that are commercially important to the development of our business. We cannot
be sure that patents will be granted with respect to any of our pending patent applications or with respect to any patent applications
filed by us in the future, nor can we be sure that any of our existing patents or any patents granted to us in the future will be commercially
useful in protecting our technology. We also rely on trade secrets to protect our commercial products and product candidates. Our commercial
success also depends in part on our non-infringement of the patents or proprietary rights of third parties.
Our ability to stop third parties from making,
using, selling, offering to sell or importing products utilizing our proprietary or patented technology is dependent upon the extent
to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents or trade secrets that cover these activities. The patent positions of pharmaceutical
and biopharmaceutical companies can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions for which important legal principles
remain unresolved. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biopharmaceutical patents has emerged to date in the
United States. The biopharmaceutical patent situation outside the United States varies from country to country and is even more uncertain.
Changes in either the patent laws or in interpretations of patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value
of our intellectual property. Accordingly, we cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced in any patents we
may be granted. Further, if any patents are granted and are subsequently deemed invalid and unenforceable, it could impact our ability
to license our technology and, as noted previously, fend off competitive challenges. Patent litigation is very expensive and we may not
have sufficient funds to defend our proprietary technology from infringement, either as a plaintiff in an action seeking to stop infringers
from using our technology, or as a defendant in an action against us alleging infringement by us.
The degree of future protection for our proprietary
rights is uncertain because legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain
or keep our competitive advantage. For example:
| ● | others
may be able to make compositions or formulations that are similar to our product s but that
are not covered by the claims of our patents; |
| ● | other
persons may have filed patents covering inventions, technology or processes that we use,
with the result that we may infringe upon the prior patents; |
| ● | others
may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or duplicate any of our technologies; |
| ● | our
pending patent applications may not result in the grant of patents; |
| ● | any
patents which may be issued may not provide us with any competitive advantages, or may be
held invalid or unenforceable as a result of legal challenges by third parties; |
| ● | our
inability to fund any litigation to defend our proprietary rights, either in defense of an
action against us or a plaintiff to seek to prevent infringement. |
| ● | our
failure to develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable. |
If we seek to expand our business through
acquisition, we may not be successful in identifying acquisition targets or integrating their businesses with our existing business.
We have recently expanded our business by acquisition,
and we may make acquisitions in the future. In 2017, we issued 1,250,000 shares of common stock, valued at $2,500,000, in connection
with our proposed acquisition of Advanced Health Brands, Inc., but the stock of Advanced Health Brands was never transferred to us and
the value of the intellectual property we were to have acquired did not have the value we anticipated, with the result that we incurred
a $2,500,000 impairment loss in the year ended January 31, 2018. In September 2018, we entered into an agreement to acquire Carmel Biosciences
Inc., and in November 2018, we terminated the agreement and are in litigation with the purported sellers of the company to us. We previously
entered into another acquisition agreement which was rescinded shortly after the agreement was executed. We cannot assure you that any
acquisition we complete will be successful or that any acquisition agreement we may enter into will result in an acquisition. An acquisition
can be unsuccessful for a number of reasons, including the following:
| ● | We
may incur significant expenses and devote significant management time to the acquisition
and we may be unable to consummate the acquisition on acceptable terms. |
| ● | The
integration of any acquisition with our existing business may be difficult and, if we are
not able to integrate the business successfully, we may not only be unable to operate the
business profitably, but management may be unable to devote the necessary time to the development
of our existing business; |
| ● | The
key employees who operated the acquired business successfully prior to the acquisition may
not be happy working for us and may resign, thus leaving the business without the necessary
continuity of management. |
| ● | Even
if the business is successful, our senior executive officers may need to devote significant
time to the acquired business, which may distract them from their other management activities. |
| ● | If
the business does not operate as we expect, we may incur an impairment charge based on the
value of the assets acquired. |
| ● | The
products or proposed products of the acquired company may have regulatory problems with the
FDA or any other regulatory agency, including the need for additional and unanticipated testing
or the need for a recall or a change in labeling. |
| ● | We
may have difficulty maintaining the necessary quality control over the acquired business
and its products and services. |
| ● | To
the extent that an acquired company operates at a loss prior to our acquisition, we may not
be able to develop profitable operations following the acquisition. |
| ● | The
acquired company may have liabilities or obligations which were not disclosed to us, or the
acquired assets, including any intellectual property, may not have the value we anticipated. |
| ● | The
assets, including intellectual property, of the acquired company may not have the value that
we anticipated. |
| ● | We
may require significant capital both to acquire and to operate the business, and the capital
requirements of the business may be greater than we anticipated. Our failure to obtain funds
on reasonable terms may impair the value of the acquisition. |
| ● | The
acquired company may not operate at the revenue level or with the gross margin shown in the
financial statements or projections. |
| ● | Patents
may not be granted for patent applications which the acquired company filed or patents may
be successfully challenged. |
| ● | There
may be conflicts in management styles that prevent us from integrating the acquired company
with us. |
| ● | The
former equity owners or officers may compete in violation of their non-competition covenants
or the non-competition covenants may be held to be unenforceable. |
| ● | The
business of the acquired company may have problems of which management was unaware and which
do not become evident until after the acquisition and we may require significant funding
to remedy the problem. |
| ● | The
indemnification obligations of the seller under the purchase agreement, if any, may be inadequate
to compensate us for any loss, damage or expense which we may sustain, including undisclosed
claims or liabilities. |
| ● | To
the extent that the acquired company is dependent upon its management to maintain relationships
with existing customers, we may have difficulty in retaining the business of these customers
if there is a change in management. |
| ● | Government
agencies may seek damages after we make the acquisition for conduct which occurred prior
to the acquisition and we may not have adequate recourse against the seller. |
If any of the foregoing or any other events which
we do not contemplate happen, we may incur significant expenses, which we may not be able to cover, and the development of our business
can be impaired. We cannot assure you that any acquisition we will make will be successful.
We may not be able to recover the 1,200,000
shares of common stock we issued in connection with our proposed acquisition of Advanced Health Brands.
On May 22, 2017, we entered into an agreement
to acquire Advanced Health Brands, which held six provisional patents for transdermal products. Pursuant to the agreement, we were to
issue 1,250,000 shares of common stock, valued at $2,500,000, in exchange for the stock of Advanced Health Brands and a related corporation.
In August 2017, when we issued the shares to the Advanced Health Brands stockholders, the Advanced Health Brands stock had not been transferred
to us. Although we did not have title to the shares of Advanced Health Brands stock, we treated the transaction as completed and we announced
that we had acquired Advanced Health Brands, relying on the stockholders’ obligation to transfer the shares to us. We had appointed
two of the Advanced Health Brands stockholders as directors and executive officers. In January 2018, we recognized an impairment loss
of $2,500,000 based on both our failure to obtain title to the Advanced Health Brands stock and our conclusion that the provisional patents
that were held by Advanced Health Brands did not have any value to us. In December 2018 50,000 shares were returned by one of the defendants.
We have commenced legal actions against Advanced Health Brands and its stockholders in Florida and New York. In the Florida action, the
court ruled against us. On February 1, 2019, we appealed the court’s order. Pursuant to a settlement agreement with one of the
defendants, that defendant returned the 50,000 shares which had been issued to her, and the shares were cancelled as of January 31, 2019.
On March 20, 2020, the Florida district court of appeal reversed the lower court ruling in the Florida state court action that dismissed
our complaint with prejudice, and gave us leave to file an amended complaint. The New York action was recently commenced against the
stockholders of Advanced Health Brands, and the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the action. We cannot assure you that we will prevail
in either action, that we will be able to recover either the 1,200,000 shares of common stock or any monetary damages from the Advanced
Health Brands stockholders or that we will not incur any liability as a result of either our issuance of the shares or our failure to
provide the necessary documentation to permit the Advanced Health Brands stockholders to sell their shares pursuant to Rule 144 or from
our treating and announcing the acquisition as completed or based on other claims.
We are dependent on third party distributors
for the international marketing of our consumer products and complying with applicable laws.
We do not currently sell or market our consumer
transdermal products domestically, or for our international sales, directly to international consumers, and we rely on distributors to
sell and market these products. We cannot market our consumer transdermal patch products in the United States without first obtaining
FDA approval. We do not plan to seek FDA approval or market these products in the United States at this time. We plan to sell our transdermal
consumer products to distributors in those countries in which the products can be sold in compliance with all applicable regulations
without our spending significant monies for preclinical and clinical studies to obtain regulatory approval.
We are dependent upon our chief executive
officer, our president and our chief operating officer.
We are dependent upon Gareth Sheridan, our chief
executive officer, Serguei Melnik, our president and Dr. Alan Smith, our chief operating officer who is president of 4P Therapeutics.
Although Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Melnik have employment agreements with us, the employment agreements does not guarantee that the officer
will continue with us. We do not have an employment agreement with Dr. Smith. The loss of Mr. Sheridan, Mr. Melnik or Dr. Smith would
materially impair our ability to conduct our business.
If we are unable to attract, train and
retain technical and financial personnel, our business may be materially and adversely affected.
Our future success depends, to a significant
extent, on our ability to attract, train and retain key management, technical, regulatory and financial personnel. Recruiting and retaining
capable personnel with experience in pharmaceutical product development is vital to our success. There is substantial competition for
qualified personnel, and, competition is likely to increase. We cannot assure you we will be able to attract or retain the personnel
we require. Our financial condition is likely to impair our ability to attract qualified candidates. If we are unable to attract and
retain qualified employees, our business may be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Concerning our Securities
Our lack of internal controls over financial
reporting may affect the market for and price of our common stock.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, we are required to file a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. Our disclosure controls and
our internal controls over financial reporting are not effective. We do not have the financial resources or personnel to develop or implement
systems that would provide us with the necessary information on a timely basis so as to be able to implement financial controls The absence
of internal controls over financial reporting may inhibit investors from purchasing our stock and may make it more difficult for us to
raise capital or borrow money. Implementing any appropriate changes to our internal controls may require specific compliance training
of our directors and employees, entail substantial costs in order to modify our existing accounting systems, take a significant period
of time to complete and divert management’s attention from other business concerns. These changes may not, however, be effective
in developing or maintaining internal control.
The market price for our common stock may
be volatile and your investment in our common stock could suffer a decline in value.
The trading volume in our stock is low, which
may result in volatility in our stock price. As a result, any reported prices may not reflect the price at which you would be able to
sell shares of common stock if you want to sell any shares you own or buy if you wish to buy shares. Further, stocks with a low trading
volume may be more subject to manipulation than a stock that has a significant public float and is actively traded. The price of our
stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, but
are not limited to, the following, in addition to the risks described above and general market and economic conditions:
| ● | the
market’s reaction to our financial condition and its perception of our ability to raise
necessary funding or enter into a joint venture, given the economic environment resulting
from the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as its perception of the possible terms of any financing
or joint venture; |
| ● | the
market’s perception as to our ability to generate positive cash flow or earnings; |
| ● | changes
in our or any securities analysts’ estimate of our financial performance; |
| ● | the
perception of our ability to raise the necessary financing to complete the product development
activities including preclinical and clinical testing required for FDA approval and our ability
to generate revenue and cash flow from our products; |
| ● | the
anticipated or actual results of our operations; |
| ● | changes
in market valuations of other companies in our industry; |
| ● | litigation
or changes in regulations and insurance company reimbursement policies affecting prescription
drugs; |
| ● | concern
that our internal controls are ineffective; |
| ● | any
discrepancy between anticipated or projected results and actual results of our operations; |
| ● | actions
by third parties to either sell or purchase stock in quantities which would have a significant
effect on our stock price; and |
| ● | other
factors not within our control. |
Raising funds by issuing equity or convertible
debt securities could dilute the net tangible book value of the common stock and impose restrictions on our working capital.
We anticipate that we will require funds in addition
to the net proceeds from this offering for our business. If we were to raise capital by issuing equity securities, either alone or in
connection with a non-equity financing, the net tangible book value of the then outstanding common stock could decline. If the additional
equity securities were issued at a per share price less than the market price, which is customary in the private placement of equity
securities, the holders of the outstanding shares would suffer dilution, which could be significant. Further, if we are able to raise
funds from the sale of debt securities, the lenders may impose restrictions on our operations and may impair our working capital as we
service any such debt obligations.
Stockholders may experience significant
dilution as a result of future equity offerings and other issuances of our common stock or other securities.
We will need to raise substantial funds in order
to develop our products. In order to raise additional capital, we may in the future offer additional shares of our common stock or other
securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock at prices that may not which is less than the market price and which
may be based on a discount from market at the time of issuance. Stockholders will incur dilution upon exercise of any outstanding stock
options, warrants or upon the issuance of shares of common stock under our present and future stock incentive programs. In addition,
the sale of shares and any future sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception
that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the price of our common stock. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that market sales
of those shares of common stock or the availability of those shares of common stock for sale will have on the market price of our common
stock.
Our failure to meet the continued listing
requirements of Nasdaq could result in a de-listing of our Common Stock.
If we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements
of Nasdaq, such as the corporate governance requirements or the minimum closing bid price requirement, Nasdaq may take steps to de-list
our securities. Such a de-listing would likely have a negative effect on the price of our Common Stock and would impair your ability
to sell or purchase our Common Stock when you wish to do so. In the event of a de-listing, we would take actions to restore our compliance
with Nasdaq’s listing requirements, but we can provide no assurance that any such action taken by us would allow our Common Stock
to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of our Common Stock, prevent our Common Stock from dropping
below the Nasdaq minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non-compliance with Nasdaq’s listing requirements.
We and our senior executive officers settled
an SEC investigation, which may affect the market for and the market price of our common stock and our ability to list on a stock exchange.
Following an investigation into the accuracy
of statements in our Form 10 registration statement filed June 2, 2016, as amended, and our Form 10-K annual report filed May 8, 2017
that did not accurately reflect the FDA’s jurisdiction over our consumer products and did not disclose that we could not legally
market these products in the United States, a Wells notice which we, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer received
on August 10, 2017 and a Wells submission which we and the officers submitted in response to the Wells notice, the SEC, on December 26,
2018, announced that it has accepted our settlement offer and instituted settled an administrative cease-and-desist proceeding against
us and our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. The SEC’s administrative order, dated December 26, 2018, finds
that we and the officers consented – without admitting or denying any findings by the SEC — to cease-and-desist orders against
them for violations by us of Sections 12(g) and 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 12b-20 and 13a-1 thereunder, which
require issuers to file accurate registration statements and annual reports with the Commission; violations by the officers for causing
our violations of the above issuer reporting provisions; and violations by the officers of Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act, which requires
each principal executive and principal financial officer of issuers to attest that annual reports filed with the SEC do not contain any
untrue statements of material fact. In addition to consenting to the cease-and-desist orders, the officers have each agreed to pay a
$25,000 civil penalty to resolve the investigation. The administrative order does not impose a civil penalty or any other monetary relief
against us. The settlement may affect the market for and the market price of our common stock.
The market price for our common stock may
be volatile and your investment in our common stock could suffer a decline in value.
The trading volume in our stock is low, which
may result in volatility in our stock price. As a result, any reported prices may not reflect the price at which you would be able to
sell shares of common stock if you want to sell any shares you own or buy if you wish to buy shares. Further, stocks with a low trading
volume may be more subject to manipulation than a stock that has a significant public float and is actively traded. The price of our
stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, but
are not limited to, the following, in addition to the risks described above and general market and economic conditions:
| ● | concern
about the effects of our settlement with the SEC; |
| ● | the
market’s reaction to our financial condition and its perception of our ability to raise
necessary funding or enter into a joint venture, given the economic environment resulting
from the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as its perception of the possible terms of any financing
or joint venture; |
| ● | the
market’s perception as to our ability to generate positive cash flow or earnings; |
| ● | changes
in our or any securities analysts’ estimate of our financial performance; |
| ● | the
perception of our ability to raise the necessary financing to complete the product development
activities including preclinical and clinical testing required for FDA approval and our ability
to generate revenue and cash flow from our products; |
| ● | the
anticipated or actual results of our operations; |
| ● | changes
in market valuations of other companies in our industry; |
| ● | litigation
or changes in regulations and insurance company reimbursement policies affecting prescription
drugs; |
| ● | concern
that our internal controls are ineffective; |
| ● | any
discrepancy between anticipated or projected results and actual results of our operations; |
| ● | actions
by third parties to either sell or purchase stock in quantities which would have a significant
effect on our stock price; and |
| ● | other
factors not within our control. |
Because of our executive officers’
stock ownership and stock ownership of certain other stockholders that have invested in the company, these stockholders have the power
to elect all directors and to approve any action requiring stockholder approval.
Our officers and directors as a group beneficially
own approximately 32% of our common stock. As a result, they have the effective power using their contacts with a limited number of other
shareholders to elect all of our directors and to approve any action requiring stockholder approval.
Raising funds by issuing equity or convertible
debt securities could dilute the net tangible book value of the common stock and impose restrictions on our working capital.
We anticipate that we will require funds in addition
to the net proceeds from this offering for our business. If we were to raise capital by issuing equity securities, either alone or in
connection with a non-equity financing, the net tangible book value of the then outstanding common stock could decline. If the additional
equity securities were issued at a per share price less than the market price, which is customary in the private placement of equity
securities, the holders of the outstanding shares would suffer dilution, which could be significant. Further, if we are able to raise
funds from the sale of debt securities, the lenders may impose restrictions on our operations and may impair our working capital as we
service any such debt obligations.
Stockholders may experience significant
dilution as a result of future equity offerings and other issuances of our common stock or other securities.
We will need to raise substantial funds in order
to develop our products. In order to raise additional capital, we may in the future offer additional shares of our common stock or other
securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock at prices that may not which is less than the market price and which
may be based on a discount from market at the time of issuance. Stockholders will incur dilution upon exercise of any outstanding stock
options, warrants or upon the issuance of shares of common stock under our present and future stock incentive programs. In addition,
the sale of shares and any future sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception
that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the price of our common stock. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that market sales
of those shares of common stock or the availability of those shares of common stock for sale will have on the market price of our common
stock.
We may issue preferred stock whose terms
could adversely affect the voting power or value of our common stock.
Our articles of incorporation authorize us to
issue, without the approval of our stockholders, one or more classes or series of preferred stock having such designations, preferences,
limitations and relative rights, including preferences over our common stock respecting dividends and distributions, as our board of
directors may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could adversely impact the voting power or value
of our common stock. For example, we might grant holders of preferred stock the right to elect a number of our directors in all events
or on the happening of specified events or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the repurchase or redemption rights or
liquidation preferences we might assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the common stock.
For as long as we are an emerging growth
company, we will not be required to comply with certain reporting requirements, including those relating to accounting standards and
disclosure about our executive compensation, that apply to other public companies.
We are classified as an “emerging growth
company” under the JOBS Act. For as long as we are an emerging growth company, which may be up to five full fiscal years, we will
not be required to, among other things, (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of our system of internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (ii) comply
with any new requirements adopted by the PCAOB requiring mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report
in which the auditor would be required to provide additional information about the audit and the financial statements of the issuer,
(iii) provide certain disclosure regarding executive compensation, or (iv) hold nonbinding advisory votes on executive compensation.
We will remain an emerging growth company for up to five years, although we will lose that status sooner if we have more than $1.07 billion
of revenues in a fiscal year, have more than $700 million in market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates, or issue more than
$1.07 billion of non-convertible debt over a three-year period. To the extent that we rely on any of the exemptions available
to emerging growth companies, you will receive less information about our executive compensation and internal control over financial
reporting than issuers that are not emerging growth companies. If some investors find our common stock to be less attractive as a result,
there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.
We do not intend to pay any cash dividends
in the foreseeable future.
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common
stock and do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains “forward-looking
statements,” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, all of which are subject to risks and
uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “expects,” “plans,” “will,”
“forecasts,” “projects,” “intends,” “estimates,” and other words of similar meaning.
One can identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements are likely to address
our growth strategy, financial results and product and development programs. One must carefully consider any such statement and should
understand that many factors could cause actual results to differ from our forward-looking statements. These factors may include inaccurate
assumptions and a broad variety of other risks and uncertainties, including some that are known and some that are not. No forward-looking
statement can be guaranteed and actual future results may vary materially.
These risks and uncertainties, many of which
are beyond our control, include, and are not limited to:
|
● |
Our ability
to raise the necessary financing for the development of our business and the terms of any financing which we are able to raise; |
|
● |
Our ability
to receive FDA marketing approval for any products we may develop; |
|
● |
Our ability
to obtain and enforce any United States and foreign patent we may seek; |
|
● |
Our ability
to design and execute clinical trials to the satisfaction of regulatory authorities; |
|
● |
Our ability
to engage, if and when necessary, an independent preclinical or clinical testing organization to design and implement our trials; |
|
● |
Our ability
to launch any products for which we receive FDA marketing approval; |
|
● |
Our ability
to generate sufficient revenue from our contract services to cover our operating expenses; |
|
● |
Our ability
to establish a distribution network for the marketing and sale of any products for which we receive FDA approval; |
|
● |
Our ability
to establish manufacturing facilities in compliance with FDA good manufacturing practices or to enter into manufacturing agreements
for the manufacture of our products in an FDA approved manufacturing facility; |
|
● |
Our ability
to enter into joint venture or other strategic relationship with respect to any of our proposed products; |
|
● |
The ability
of the other party to any joint venture or strategic relationship to implement successfully any plans for the development, clinical
testing, manufacturing and marketing of the products subject to the joint venture or strategic relationship; |
|
● |
Our ability
to evaluate potential acquisitions, and the consequences of our failure to accurately evaluate the acquisitions; |
|
● |
Our ability
to integrate any business we acquire with our business; |
|
● |
Changes
in national, regional and local government regulations, taxation, controls and political and economic developments that the market
for our products; |
|
● |
Our ability
to develop and market products with the most current technology; |
|
● |
Our ability
to obtain and maintain any permits or licenses necessary for our business; |
|
● |
Our ability
to identify, hire and retain qualified executive, administrative, regulatory, research and development, and other personnel; |
|
● |
Our ability
to negotiate licenses on favorable terms with companies that have experience in marketing products such as ours; |
|
● |
The costs
associated with defending and resolving pending and potential legal claims, even if such claims are without merit; |
|
● |
The effects
of the SEC settlement; |
|
● |
The effects
of competition on our and our licensee’s ability to price, market and sell our product; |
|
● |
Our ability
to achieve favorable pricing for our products with third party reimbursement parties with respect to our products; |
|
● |
Our ability
to accurately estimate anticipated expenses, capital requirements and needs for additional financing; |
|
● |
Our ability
to accurately estimate the timing, cost or other aspects of the commercialization of our product candidates; |
|
● |
Actions
by third parties to either sell or purchase our common stock in quantities that would have a significant effect on our stock price; |
|
● |
Risks
generally associated with pre-revenue development stage companies in the pharmaceutical industry; |
|
● |
Current
and future economic and political conditions; |
|
● |
The impact
of changes in accounting rules on our financial statements; |
|
● |
Other
assumptions described in this prospectus; and |
|
● |
Other
matters that are not within our control. |
Information regarding market and industry statistics
contained in this prospectus is included based on information available to us that we believe is accurate. It is generally based on industry
and other publications that are not produced for purposes of securities offerings or economic analysis. We have not reviewed or included
data from all sources. Forecasts and other forward-looking information obtained from these sources are subject to the same qualifications
and the additional uncertainties accompanying any estimates of future market size, revenue and market acceptance of products and services.
We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statement. As a result, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements.
The forward-looking statements in this prospectus
speak only as of the date of this prospectus and you should not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements are subject to certain events, risks, and uncertainties that may be outside of our control. When considering forward-looking
statements, you should carefully review the risks, uncertainties and other cautionary statements in this prospectus as they identify
certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking
statements. These factors include, among others, the risks described under in this prospectus, including those described under “Business,”
“Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
as well as in other reports and documents we file with the SEC. We undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results
of any revision to these forward-looking statements, except as required by law. Given these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
USE OF PROCEEDS
Any proceeds that we receive upon exercise of Warrants
will be used for working capital. There are no assurances that any Warrants will be exercised.
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization
as of April 30, 2022
|
|
April
30,
2022 |
|
Common stock |
|
$ |
7,820 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
29,967,467 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(304 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(18,701,220 |
) |
Stockholders’ equity |
|
|
11,080,100 |
|
You should read the foregoing table in connection
with “Prospectus Summary — Selected Consolidated Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes.
As of June 27, 2022, we had 89 holders of record
of our common stock.
The transfer agent for the common stock is American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, 6201 15th Ave, Brooklyn, NY, telephone (800) 937-5449.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. See
“Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking
statements as a result of certain factors discussed in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.
It should be noted that current public health
threats could adversely affect our ongoing or planned business operations. In particular, the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has resulted
in quarantines, restrictions on travel and other business and economic disruptions. We cannot presently predict the scope and severity
of any potential business shutdowns or disruptions, but if we or any of the third parties with whom we engage, including the partners
and other third parties with whom we conduct business, were to experience shutdowns or other business disruptions, our ability to conduct
our business in the manner and on the timelines presently planned could be materially and adversely impacted. The measures being taken
by service providers and government agencies to suppress the spread of COVID-19 infection may delay time to production of our planned
abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system product and therefor delay the time of filing with FDA for approval.
Overview
Our primary business is the development of a
portfolio of transdermal pharmaceutical products. Our lead product is our abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system which we are developing
to provide clinicians and patients with an extended-release transdermal fentanyl product for use in managing chronic pain requiring around
the clock opioid therapy combined with properties designed to help combat the opioid crisis by deterring the abuse and misuse of fentanyl
patches. We believe that our abuse deterrent technology can be broadly applied to various transdermal products and our strategy is to
follow the development of our abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system with the development of additional transdermal prescription
products for pharmaceuticals that have risks or a history of abuse. We received on January 28, 2022 an Issue Notification from the United
States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for its United States patent entitled, “Abuse and Misuse Deterrent Transdermal System,”
that protects our AVERSA™ transdermal abuse deterrent technology. In addition, we are developing a portfolio of transdermal pharmaceutical
products to deliver commercially available drugs or biologics that are typically delivered by injection but with the potential to improve
compliance and therapeutic outcomes.
We are proceeding with our development efforts
with respect to these products and to performing contract services for a small number of customers. Because of both our financial position
and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, our contract service business has also been scaled back. The description of our business in
this annual report is based on our ability to raise significant financing or enter into a joint venture agreement with a third party
that has the financial ability to fund the joint venture’s operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain necessary
financing or enter into a joint venture agreement on reasonable, if any, terms. If we are not able to continue to obtain financing or
enter into a joint venture agreement, we may not be able to continue in business.
Through July 31, 2018, our business was the development
of a line of consumer and health products that are delivered through a transdermal or topical patch. Consumer products are products that
are sold over the counter and do not require a prescription. Most of our consumer products require FDA approval for sale in the United
States, and we have not sought to obtain, and we do not plan to seek to obtain, FDA approval to market these products in the United States
at this time. Following our acquisition of Pocono, our focus is primarily now on providing contract manufacturing services and consulting
services to 3rd party brands with no intention at this time to launch our own consumer products.
With our acquisition of 4P Therapeutics on August
1, 2018, our focus changed, and we are seeking to develop and seek FDA approval on a number of transdermal pharmaceutical products under
development by 4P Therapeutics. As a result of the acquisition of 4P Therapeutics, we have pipeline of potential products.
4P Therapeutics has not generated any revenue
from any of its products under development. Rather, prior to our acquisition, 4P Therapeutics generated revenue to provide cash for its
operations through contract research and development and related services for a small number of clients in the life sciences field on
an as-needed basis. We are, for the near term, continuing this activity, although we do not anticipate that it will generate significant
revenues and, since our acquisition, it has generated a negative gross margin. We have no long-term contractual obligations, and either
party can terminate at any time.
With the change in our focus, our capital requirements
have increased substantially. The process of developing pharmaceutical products and submitting them for FDA approval is both time consuming
and expensive, with no assurance of obtaining approval from the FDA to market our product in the United States. We have budgeted $5.0
million for research and development of our abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system, including clinical manufacturing and clinical
trials that need to be completed in order to obtain FDA approval. However, the total cost could be substantially in excess of that amount.
On March 25, 2020, we completed a private placement
of 46,828 units at a price of $11 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common
stock at an exercise price of $14 per share. The warrants expire April 30, 2023. We issued a total of 46,828 shares of common stock and
warrants to purchase 46,828 shares of common stock. We received proceeds of $515,113.
On March 25, 2020, we paid off the convertible
notes in the principal amount of $270,000 from the proceeds of the private placement. The total payments, including the prepayment penalty
and accrued interest, was $345,656. The payment was made from the proceeds of the private placement. As a result of the payment of the
notes, the derivative liability, which was $928,774 at July 31, 2020, was reduced to zero. As a result of a completed private placement,
the warrants to purchase 50,000 shares at the lesser of (i) $20.90 or, (ii) if the Company completes its public offering of its common
stock, 110% of the initial public offering price of the Common Stock in the public offering, became a warrant to purchase 95,000 warrants
at $11 per share, subject to adjustment pursuant to the antidilution provisions of the warrant. The Company recorded a derivative liability
for the warrants in the amount of $906,678 and reclassed the derivative liability to additional paid-in capital as of January 31, 2021.
In March 2020, a minority stockholder who had
previously made loans to us in the total amount of $215,00, made an additional loan to us in the amount of $60,000, increasing the total
loans from the stockholder to $275,000. On March 27, 2020, we issued 25,000 shares of common stock upon conversion of the notes.
Pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (“SPA”),
dated December 7, 2020, with the Company, BPM Inno Ltd., Kiryat, Israel, purchased 81,396 shares of common stock at a price of $8.60
per share, or $700,000, which provided payment for the RamBam license. The transaction was completed at a closing on February 26, 2021.
On August 31, 2020, the Company entered into
a Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”), with Pocono Coated Products (“PCP”), pursuant to which PCP agreed to sell
the Company all of the assets associated with its Transdermal, Topical, Cosmetic and Nutraceutical business (the “Assets”).
PCP is the manufacturer of our transdermal products, and we bought that business from them. The purchase price for the Assets was (i)
$6,000,000 paid in shares of the Company’s common stock at a value of the average price of the previous 90 days at the date of
Closing (the “Shares”); (ii) a promissory note of the Company in the principal amount of $1,500,000, which is due upon the
earlier of (a) twelve (12) months from issuance, or (b) immediately following a capital raise of no less than $4,000,000 and/or a public
offering of no less than $4,000,000. The note was repaid in full in October 2021. Subsequent to the repayment of the note, the Shares
were released from escrow.
On October 5, 2021, the Company, having been
approved for the listing of its common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market effective October 1, 2021, consummated a public offering (the
“IPO”) of units (the “Units”), of common stock and warrants that were offered in the IPO on The Nasdaq Capital
Market, which included 1,056,000 (each a “Unit”), each Unit consisting of one share of common stock, par value $0.001 per
share, and one warrant (each a “Warrant”) at a price of $6.25 per Unit. Each Warrant is immediately exercisable, will entitle
the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $7.50 and will expire five (5) years from the date of issuance.
The underwriters’ over-allotment option was exercised for 158,400 warrants to purchase shares of common stock bringing to total
net proceeds to the Company from the IPO to $5,836,230. The shares of common stock and Warrants are separately transferred immediately
upon issuance. As of January 3, 2022, 392,396 Warrants issued in the IPO have been exercised, with net proceeds to the Company of $2,942,970.
On November 1, 2021, The Board of Directors adopted
the 2021 Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). The Company has reserved 350,000 shares to issue and sell upon the exercise
of stock options issued under the Plan. On November 3, 2021, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8, to register under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the 350,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan. On January 21, 2022,
the Board approved options to purchase 163,500 shares of the Company’s common stock issued to executive officers and directors
of the Company at a price of $4.85 ($5.34 per share for two of the officers as required by IRS rules).
Years Ended January 31, 2022 and 2021
For the year ended January 31, 2022, we generated
revenue of $1,422,154 and our costs of revenue were $917,844, resulting in a gross margin of $504,310. For the year ended January 31,
2021, we generated revenue of $943,702 and our costs of revenue were $627,378, resulting in a gross margin of $316,324. Our revenue for
January 31, 2022 was derived from three sources – (1) a continuation of research and development contracts of the type 4P Therapeutics
performed prior to our acquisition, which accounted for $242,354, (2) sales of our consumer transdermal product to or South Korean distributor,
which accounted for $86,600 which our distributor purchased for its preliminary marketing efforts since the product has not obtained
regulatory approval for retail sales in South Korea and (3) sales from our recent acquisition of transdermal patches, which accounted
for $1,093,200. Since we do not have the funds for development of our lead product, the 4P Therapeutics fixed costs are allocated to
the contract services that we perform for clients. Our cost of revenue for our contract research and development services represents
basically our labor cost plus a modest amount of material costs which we passed on to the client. The Company moved from the 4P facilities,
and many of the prior costs relating to the facility were not incurred.
For the year ended January 31, 2022, our selling,
general and administrative expenses were $4,022,824, primarily legal, accounting, administrative salaries and non-cash expenses of $1,364,732,
compared to $2,912,269 for the year ended January 31, 2021.The increase from 2021 is primarily attributable to non-cash consulting expenses
of $1,364,732, and the inclusion of expenses of $668,661 of Active Intelligence in 2022.
During the year ended January 31, 2022, the Company
recorded an impairment expense of $2,180,836 due to a write down of Goodwill in connection with its Pocono acquisition. The write down
of goodwill is attributable primarily to the effects of the pandemic. The valuation of the reporting unit does not exceed the carrying
amount of goodwill using the value in use or the going concern premise.
During the year January 31, 2022, the Company
commenced research and development expenses on its Aversa product and incurred $144,000 of salary liabilities that were paid with the
issuance of common stock and other expenses of $267,303.
During the year ended January 31, 2021, we incurred
gain on change in fair value of derivatives of $22,096 in connection with our October 2019 financing in which we raised gross proceeds
of $250,000 and net proceeds of approximately $230,000 from the sale of convertible notes and warrants. During the year ended January
31, 2022, the Company incurred a gain on extinguishment of debt of $53,028, consisting primarily of forgiveness of a PPP loan.
We incurred interest expense of $118,421, primarily
from the amortization of debt discounts for the Year ended January 31, 2022, as compared to $280,686 for the year ended January 31, 2021.
As a result of the foregoing, we sustained a
net loss of $6,372,715, or $(0.94) per share (basic and diluted) for the year ended January 31, 2022, compared with a loss of $2,932,828,
or $(0.51) per share (basic and diluted) for the year ended January 31, 2021. The net loss for 2022 includes a deemed dividend of $196,589
from the settlement of a warrant round down.
Three
Months Ended April 30, 2022 and 2021
For
the three months ended April 30, 2022, we generated revenue of $477,922 and our costs of revenue were $277,436, resulting in a gross
margin of $200,486. For the three months ended April 30, 2021, we generated revenue of $433,488 and our costs of revenue were $195,610,
resulting in a gross margin of $237,878. Our revenue for April 30, 2022 was derived from sales of $401,990 from our Pocono Pharmaceutical
segment and $75,992 from contract services from our 4P Therapeutics segment. The increase in revenue from the Pocono Pharmaceutical segment
is primarily due to an increase in demand which has continued in the subsequent quarter. Since we do not have the funds for development
of our lead product, the 4P Therapeutics fixed costs are allocated to the contract services that we perform for clients. Our cost of
revenue for our contract research and development services represents our labor cost plus a modest amount of material costs which we
passed on to the client. The Company moved from the 4P facilities, and many of the prior costs relating to the facility were not incurred.
For
the three months ended April 30, 2022, our selling, general and administrative expenses were $768,551 primarily legal, accounting and
administrative salaries compared to $551,942 for the three months ended April 30, 2021.The increase from 2021 is primarily attributable
to increases in administrative salaries of $148,000 and other overhead costs including professional fees and travel.
During
the three months ended April 30, 2022, the Company incurred research and development expenses of its Aversa product of $117,814, primarily
of salaries and development costs from Kindeva.
We
incurred interest expense of $4,110 for the three months ended April 30, 2022, as compared to $40,869 for the three months ended April
30, 2021. Interest expense for 2021 was primarily attributable to the amortization of debt discounts.
As
a result of the foregoing, we sustained a net loss of $689,989 or $(0.09) per share (basic and diluted) for the three months ended April
30, 2022, compared with a loss of $315,957, or $(0.05) per share (basic and diluted) for the three months ended April 30, 2021.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As
of April 30, 2022, we had $4,010,644 in cash and cash equivalents and working capital of $3,918,855, as compared with cash and cash equivalents
of $4,898,868 and working capital of $4,686,112 as of January 31, 2022. The Company received proceeds of approximately $8.5 million from
the completion of its public offering, exercise of warrants and the sale of common stock during the year ended January 31, 2022.
For
the three months ended April 30, 2022, we used cash of $744,257 in our operations. The principal adjustments to our net loss of $689,989
were depreciation and amortization of $77,475, offset by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $146,728.
For
the three months ended April 30, 2022, we used cash in investing activities of $43,803 primarily for the purchase of equipment.
For
the three months ended April 30, 2022, we used cash in financing activities of $93,164 primarily from the purchase of treasury stock
of $89,196.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
We
have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial
condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Going
Concern Assessment
Management
assesses liquidity and going concern uncertainty in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements to determine whether
there is sufficient cash on hand and working capital, including available borrowings on loans, to operate for a period of at least one
year from the date the consolidated financial statements are issued or available to be issued, which is referred to as the “look-forward
period”, as defined in GAAP. As part of this assessment, based on conditions that are known and reasonably knowable to management,
management will consider various scenarios, forecasts, projections, estimates and will make certain key assumptions, including the timing
and nature of projected cash expenditures or programs, its ability to delay or curtail expenditures or programs and its ability to raise
additional capital, if necessary, among other factors. Based on this assessment, as necessary or applicable, management makes certain
assumptions around implementing curtailments or delays in the nature and timing of programs and expenditures to the extent it deems probable
those implementations can be achieved and management has the proper authority to execute them within the look-forward period.
As
of April 30, 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents of $4,010,644 and working capital of $3,918,885. For the three months ended April
30, 2022, the Company incurred an operating loss of $689,989 and used cash flow from operations of $744,257. The Company has generated
operating losses since its inception and has relied on sales of securities and issuance of third-party and related party debt to support
cash flow from operations. In October 2021, the Company consummated a public offering and received net proceeds of $5,836,230. The Company
also received $2,942,970 proceeds from the exercise of warrants.
Management
has prepared estimates of operations for fiscal year 2022 and 2023 believes that sufficient funds will be generated from operations to
fund its operations for one year from the date of the filing of these condensed consolidated financial statements, which indicates improved
operations and the Company’s ability to continue operations as a going concern. The impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s business
has been considered in these assumptions; however, it is too early to know the full impact of COVD-19 or its timing on a return to more
normal operations.
Management
believes the substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is alleviated by the above assessment.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates including,
but not limited to, those related to such items as income tax exposures, accruals, depreciable/useful lives, allowance for doubtful accounts
and valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on other various assumptions that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets
and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which
amends the accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at
an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to a customer. The Company adopted the guidance under the new
revenue standards using the modified retrospective method effective February 1, 2018 and determined no cumulative effect adjusted to
retained earnings was necessary upon adoption. Topic 606 requires the Company to recognize revenues when control of the promised goods
or services and receipt of payment is probable. The Company recognizes revenue based on the five criteria for revenue recognition established
under Topic 606: 1) identify the contract, 2) identify separate performance obligations, 3) determine the transaction price, 4) allocate
the transaction price among the performance obligations, and 5) recognize revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied.
Accounts
receivable
Trade
accounts receivables are recorded at the net invoice value and are not interest bearing. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful
accounts for estimated losses from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The Company determines its allowances by
both specific identification of customer accounts where appropriate and the application of historical loss to non-applicable accounts.
For the three months ended April 30, 2022 and 2021, the Company recorded no bad debt expense for doubtful accounts related to account
receivable.
Inventories
Inventories
are valued at the lower of cost and reasonable value determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Net realized value is the
estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable selling expenses. The cost of finished goods and
work in process is comprised of material costs, direct labor costs and other direct costs and related production overheads (based on
normal operating capacity). As of April 30, 2022 and January 31, 2022, 100% of the inventory consists of raw materials.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible
assets include trademarks, intellectual property and customer base acquired through business combinations. The Company accounts for Other
Intangible Assets under the guidance of ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other.” The Company capitalizes certain costs
related to patent technology. A substantial component of the purchase price related to the Company’s acquisitions have also been
assigned to intellectual property and other intangibles. Under the guidance, other intangible assets with definite lives are amortized
over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested annually for impairment. Trademarks, intellectual
property and customer base are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of ten years.
Goodwill
Goodwill
represents the difference between the total purchase price and the fair value of assets (tangible and intangible) and liabilities at
the date of acquisition. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually on January 31, and more frequently as circumstances warrant, and
written down only in the period in which the recorded value of such assets exceeds their fair value. The Company does not amortize goodwill
in accordance with ASC 350. In connection with the Company’s acquisition of 4P Therapeutics LLC in 2018, the Company recorded Goodwill
of $1,719,235. On August 31, 2020, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Pocono Coated Products LLC and Active Intelligence
LLC, the Company recorded Goodwill of $5,810,640. During the year ended January 31, 2022, the Company recorded an impairment charge of
$2,180,836 reducing the Active Intelligence LLC Goodwill to $3,629,813. As of April 30, 2022 and January 31, 2022, Goodwill amounted
to $5,349,039.
Long-lived
Assets
Management
reviews long-lived assets for potential impairment whenever significant events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment exists when the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable and
exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the estimated undiscounted
cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If an impairment exists, the resulting write-down would
be the difference between the fair market value of the long-lived asset and the related book value.
Earnings
per Share
Basic
earnings per share of common stock is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares
of common stock and potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Potential shares of common stock consist of
shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options and common stock purchase warrants. As of April 30, 2022, and 2021, there were
1,394,032 and 141,830 common stock equivalents outstanding, that were not included in the calculation of dilutive earnings per share
as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
Stock-Based
Compensation
ASC
718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation,” prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all share-based payment transactions
in which employee services, and, since February 1, 2019, non-employees, are acquired. Transactions include incurring liabilities, or
issuing or offering to issue shares, options and other equity instruments such as employee stock ownership plans and stock appreciation
rights. Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the
financial statements based on their fair values. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide
services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). As of February 1, 2019, pursuant
to ASC 2018-07, ASC 718 was applied to stock-based compensation for both employees and non-employees.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Business
Our primary business is the development of a
portfolio of transdermal pharmaceutical products. Our development pipeline consists of transdermal products that are based on our proprietary
AVERSA® abuse deterrent transdermal technology that can be incorporated into transdermal patches that contain drugs that
are susceptible to abuse and misuse.
Our first product under development is AVERSA
Fentanyl, an abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system that combines an existing generic fentanyl patch with our AVERSA technology
to reduce the abuse and misuse of fentanyl patches. We believe that AVERSA technology can be broadly applied to various transdermal products,
and our plan is to follow the development of our abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system with the development of additional transdermal
deterrent products for pharmaceuticals that have a risk or history of abuse. Specifically, we have expanded our development pipeline
to include AVERSA Buprenorphine and AVERSA Methylphenidate. In addition, we are developing a portfolio of transdermal pharmaceutical
products to deliver already approved drugs or biologics that are typically delivered by injection but with the potential to improve compliance
and therapeutic outcomes by providing them as transdermal patches.
We have signed a feasibility agreement for with
Kindeva Drug Delivery, formerly 3M Drug Delivery, for the development of AVERSA Fentanyl using Kindeva’s FDA approved Fentanyl
patch. The feasibility agreement is focused on adapting Kindeva’s commercial transdermal
manufacturing process to incorporate AVERSA technology.
The product development program for AVERSA Fentanyl
includes performing preclinical and clinical studies to demonstrate the abuse deterrent properties of the product. The program assumes
that the fentanyl transdermal system is already approved and the only change to the approved product will be to incorporate the AVERSA
technology into the patch design with no change being made to the fentanyl drug matrix or its demonstrated safety or drug release characteristics.
Preclinical studies to be performed primarily consist of laboratory-based in vitro manipulation and extraction studies in various extraction
media per FDA guidance. Clinical evaluation primarily consists of a Phase 1 Human Abuse Liability (HAL) study to demonstrate the abuse
potential of the product per FDA guidance. The regulatory path for FDA approval is planned to be a 505(b)(2) NDA submission to access
the safety and efficacy information on file for Duragesic® fentanyl transdermal system as the reference-listed drug. The
product development program for the additional AVERSA pipeline products, AVERSA Buprenorphine and AVERSA Methylphenidate, are similar
to that of AVERSA Fentanyl, assuming that the AVERSA technology is incorporated into an already approved transdermal patch.
Through July 31, 2018, we had not generated any
revenue from our business, which was the research and development of transdermal consumer patches. Consumer products are products that
can be sold over-the-counter and do not require a prescription. Most transdermal patches are considered drugs in the United States and
cannot be marketed in the United States without approval from the FDA. We have not taken any steps to seek to obtain FDA approval for
any of our consumer products in development, and we have no plans to do so in the near term.
Acquisition of 4P Therapeutics
Pursuant to an acquisition agreement dated April
5, 2018 between us and 4P Therapeutics, on August 1, 2018, we acquired all of the equity interest in 4P Therapeutics from Steven Damon,
the owner of 4P Therapeutics. The purchase price of $2,250,000, consisting of 62,500 shares of common stock, valued at $1,850,000, and
cash of $400,000, and are to pay Mr. Damon a 6% royalty on any revenue we receive or derive from our utilization or sale of the abuse
deterrent intellectual property that we acquired as a part of the assets 4P Therapeutics, including partner license milestones and development
payments. The royalty is payable pursuant to the acquisition agreement and continues as long as we generate revenue from our utilization
or sale of the abuse deterrent intellectual property we acquired as part of the acquisition of 4P Therapeutics. The 62,500 shares were
issued to Mr. Damon (41,750 shares) and Dr. Alan Smith (20,750 shares). In connection with the acquisition, Mr. Damon retained any cash
and accounts receivable and assumed any liabilities other than those relating to the ongoing business. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement,
we appointed Mr. Damon to our board of directors in April 2018, when we signed the acquisition agreement, and we agreed to pay Mr. Damon
the compensation received by independent board members.
As a result of the acquisition, the focus of
our business has changed from the development and marketing outside of the U.S. of consumer transdermal products to the development of
4P Therapeutics’ portfolio of pharmaceutical transdermal products. Our lead product under development is AVERSA®
Fentanyl (abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system) which we plan to develop to deter the abuse and accidental misuse of fentanyl
transdermal patches. Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid that is marketed as a transdermal patch for chronic pain management. There
are currently a number of generic fentanyl patches on the market but none of them have abuse deterrent properties. We believe that our
AVERSA® abuse deterrent technology, containing aversive agents will significantly deter the abuse and accidental misuse
of fentanyl from transdermal patches.
With the acquisition of 4P Therapeutics, we acquired
a research pipeline of other transdermal products, including peptides and proteins such as exenatide for type 2 diabetes and FSH for
infertility. These drugs are off patent but are currently only available as injections, and we are evaluating the possibility of developing
a transdermal delivery system for these drugs as an alternative to injection but with improved compliance and safety. In addition, we
may develop certain generic transdermal products where we think we can make an improvement to existing patches and where we believe we
can take significant market share with good profit margins. One example of such a product candidate is the development of a generic scopolamine
patch. The prioritization of our portfolio product candidates will be reviewed on an ongoing basis and will take into account technical
progress, market potential and commercial interest. We cannot assure you that we will be able to develop and obtain FDA approval for
any of these potential products or that we can be successful in marketing any such products. The FDA approval process can take many years
to complete successfully, and we will require substantial funding for each product that goes through the process. We cannot assure you
that we will obtain FDA marketing approval for any of our products.
In addition to performing research and development
for its own products, 4P Therapeutics performs contract research and development services for a small number of clients in the life sciences
field to help support its ongoing operations. The work includes conducting early-stage drug and device clinical and preclinical studies
and providing clinical-regulatory and formulation/analytical consulting services. Neither we nor current clients have any long-term commitments,
and either party can terminate at any time. We do not expect to generate significant revenues from these services.
Acquisition of Pocono Coated Products
On August 25, 2020, the Company formed Pocono
Pharmaceuticals Inc.(“Pocono”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Effective August 31, 2020, the Company entered
into a Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) with Pocono Coated Products (“PCP”), a manufacturer of Topical and transdermal
products, pursuant to which PCP agreed to sell the Company certain of the assets and liabilities associated with its Transdermal, Topical,
Cosmetic and Nutraceutical business (the “Business”), including all related equipment, intellectual property and trade secrets,
cash balances, receivables, bank accounts and inventory. The net assets were contributed to Pocono. Included in the transaction, the
Company acquired 100% of the membership interests of Active Intelligence LLC (“Active Intelligence”). The purchase price
for the assets of the Business is (i) $6,000,000 paid in 608,519 shares of the Company’s common stock, based on the average price
for the Company’s common stock for the previous 90 days as of the date of Closing (the “Shares”); (ii) a promissory
note of the Company in the principal amount of $1,500,000, which has been paid in full as of October 1, 2021.
Our Organization
We are a Nevada corporation, incorporated on
January 4, 2016. In January 2016, we acquired Nutriband Ltd, an Irish company which was formed by Gareth Sheridan, our chief executive
officer, in 2012, to enter the health and wellness market by marketing transdermal patches. Our corporate headquarters are located at
121 S. Orange Ave. Suite 1500, Orlando, Florida 32801, telephone (407) 377-6695. Our website is www.nutriband.com. Information
contained on or available through our website or any other website does not constitute a portion of this annual report.
Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company
As a company with less than $1.07 billion in
revenue during our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business
Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of reduced reporting requirements that are otherwise
generally applicable to public companies, although as a smaller reporting company we are taking advantage of reduced reporting requirements.
In particular, as an emerging growth company, we:
| ● | may
present only two years of audited financial statements and related disclosure under Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, or MD&A; |
| ● | are
not required to provide a detailed narrative disclosure discussing our compensation principles,
objectives and elements and analyzing how those elements fit with our principles and objectives,
which is commonly referred to as “compensation discussion and analysis”; |
| ● | are
not required to obtain an attestation and report from our auditors on our management’s
assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002; |
| ● | are
not required to obtain a non-binding advisory vote from our stockholders on executive compensation
or golden parachute arrangements (commonly referred to as the “say-on-pay,” “say-on
frequency” and “say-on-golden-parachute” votes); |
| ● | are
exempt from certain executive compensation disclosure provisions requiring a pay-for-performance
graph and chief executive officer pay ratio disclosure; |
| ● | are
not required to conduct an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting by
our auditors. |
We intend to take advantage of all of these reduced
reporting requirements and exemptions. However, since we have already adopted certain new or revised accounting standards under §107
of the JOBS Act, we are not able to take advantage of the delayed phase in of the new or revised accounting standards.
Under the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of
the above-described reduced reporting requirements and exemptions for up to five years after our initial sale of common equity pursuant
to a registration statement declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or such earlier time that we no longer meet
the definition of an emerging growth company. The JOBS Act provides that we would cease to be an “emerging growth company”
if we have more than $1.07 billion in annual revenues (as adjusted for inflation), have more than $700 million in market value of our
common stock held by non-affiliates, or issue more than $1 billion in principal amount of non-convertible debt over a three-year period.
Under current Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, rules however, we will continue to qualify as a “smaller reporting company”
for so long as we have either (i) a public float (i.e., the market value of common equity held by non-affiliates) of less than $250 million
as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (ii) annual revenues of less than $100 million and
a public float of less than $700 million.
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Our business may be affected by the COVID-19
pandemic and the response to the pandemic. Factors which may affect our business include, but are not limited to, the following:
| ● | Our
ability to raise financing for our operations and to enter into a joint venture agreement
may be affected by both the willingness and ability of potential financing sources and potential
joint venture partners to invest in an undercapitalized business, particularly at a time
when the potential financing source or joint venture partner may need to devote its resources
to existing portfolio companies or joint ventures which may be in need of financing decision
by investors who would invest in early stage pharmaceutical companies to limit their financing
efforts to companies that are dealing with products or services related to COVID-19 diagnosis
or treatment. |
| ● | The
decision by investors who would invest in early-stage pharmaceutical companies to limit their
financing efforts to companies that are dealing with products or services related to COVID-19
diagnosis or treatment. |
| ● | The
effect of recent stock market declines on the willingness of investors to make an investment
in our securities. |
| ● | The
financial health of our potential contract service customers. |
| ● | Our
ability to perform contract services. |
| ● | Our
ability to obtain any goods or services which we may need to perform contract services. |
| ● | The
ability of our foreign distributors to obtain regulatory approval, which may be affected
by the regulatory agencies giving a low priority to products such as our consumer patches. |
Pharmaceutical Products in Development
We have a pipeline of transdermal pharmaceutical
products that are primarily in the early stages of development. Our current focus is on the development of AVERSA Fentanyl for which
we have signed a feasibility agreement with Kindeva Drug Delivery, a contract development and manufacturing organization. We plan to
follow on from this with development of additional products utilizing the AVERSA abuse deterrent transdermal technology, AVERSA Buprenorphine
and AVERSA Methylphenidate.
Our lead product under development is our AVERSA
Fentanyl product which is an abuse deterrent fentanyl patch for the treatment of chronic pain. As the United States faces an epidemic
of opioid abuse, fentanyl transdermal patches have become an attractive target for recreational drug abusers due to the high potency
of fentanyl and its ease of abuse by the oral route. We are looking to utilize our proprietary approach to incorporate aversive agents
into the transdermal patch to deter the abuse of fentanyl patches by the oral, buccal and inhaled routes, which represent as much as
70% of all transdermal fentanyl abuse. The technology is based on the incorporation of taste and sensory aversive agents into the patch
that have high potency, established safety, and the potential to prevent accidental misuse by children and pets. The aversive agents
are coated onto the backing of the transdermal patch in a controlled release formulation that provides immediate and sustained release.
This provides several advantages including physical separation of the aversive agents from the drug matrix, availability of aversive
agents before and after use as well as making it difficult to separate the aversive agents from the drug by extraction. The aversive
agents are not contained in the drug matrix and are not delivered to the skin during patch wear. In addition to the fentanyl patch, this
technology has broad applicability to any therapeutic patch where deterring abuse as well as accidental misuse by children and pets are
valuable attributes.
We believe that our abuse deterrent technology
can be broadly applied to various transdermal products and our strategy is to follow the development of our AVERSA Fentanyl with the
development of additional products for pharmaceuticals that have a risk or history of abuse. For example, we believe that our technology
can be utilized in other transdermal products to deter the abuse of other drugs such as buprenorphine, an opioid used to treat acute
pain and chronic pain, and methylphenidate, a central nervous system stimulant. Buprenorphine is an opioid used to treat opioid addiction,
acute pain and chronic pain. It can be used under the tongue, by injection, as a skin patch, or as an implant. For opioid addiction,
it is typically only started when withdrawal symptoms have begun and for the first two days of treatment under direct observation of
a health care provider. For longer term treatment of addiction, a combination formulation of buprenorphine/naloxone is recommended to
prevent misuse by injection. Methylphenidate, sold under various trade names, such as Ritalin in oral form, and in transdermal patch
form known as Daytrana, is a central nervous system stimulant that is used in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
and narcolepsy. We plan to develop transdermal delivery systems for buprenorphine and methylphenidate after we make significant progress
on our abuse deterrent fentanyl transdermal system.
Our research pipeline consists primarily of drug
compounds which have been previously approved by the FDA and are now off-patent. In some cases, we are developing a non-injectable version
of the drug utilizing our transdermal technology which represents a new route of administration. In most cases, we plan to utilize the
505(b) (2) NDA regulatory pathway provided by the FDA which allows us to reference the safety information on file at FDA for the
approved drug or to reference the published literature instead of having to generate new safety information that would typically be required
for new chemical entities. However, we cannot assure you that the FDA will concur with our approach or that we will be able to receive
FDA approval to market any of products that we develop.
We are also exploring product applications for
our transdermal technology to deliver proteins and peptides such as exenatide for type 2 diabetes and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)
for infertility. Presently, these products are only available by injection or oral routes. We believe that transdermal delivery has the
potential to improve compliance, which can lead to improved therapeutic outcomes associated with these treatments.
Exenatide (exendin-4) is a glucagon-like peptide-1
(GLP-1) receptor agonist which is approved to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exenatide is currently
approved as a twice-daily subcutaneous injection or as a once-weekly injection. However, many patients have a strong aversion to needles,
resist initiation of injections even when oral agents are failing to control their diabetes and struggle with compliance after starting
therapy. We have performed pre-clinical work on the development of a novel transdermal patch for administration of exenatide to match
the therapeutic plasma levels achieved by subcutaneous injections of exenatide. However, we need substantial funds before we can continue
these efforts. In addition to being needle-free, painless and easy-to-use, our proposed exenatide transdermal system is being designed
to incorporate compliance tracking to help providers improve patient outcomes. We believe that the development of an exenatide patch
matching the profile of exenatide injections will follow the 505(b)(2) NDA regulatory pathway, thereby limiting the extent of safety
and efficacy trials required for FDA approval, although we cannot assure you that the FDA will agree. Transdermal exenatide is currently
in the preclinical phase of development.
Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is a gonadotropin,
a glycoprotein polypeptide hormone that is synthesized and secreted by the gonadotropic cells of the anterior pituitary gland. Follicle
stimulating hormone (FSH) is indicated for the treatment of infertility in women and is currently only approved and marketed as a subcutaneous
injection. FSH is mainly used for ovarian hyperstimulation as part of an in vitro fertilization (IVF) regimen. There are several purified
and recombinant FSH injections currently on the market. We are developing a novel transdermal patch to match the pharmacokinetic profile
of FSH subcutaneous injection but without the need for painful injections. Transdermal FSH is intended to offer a painless, easy to use
one-step application to improve patient compliance with FSH therapy. Transdermal FSH will be offered at multiple strengths to match the
typical doses prescribed to treat infertility. We plan to conduct a Phase 1 clinical trial to demonstrate that the transdermal patch
can match the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous injection. Then we plan to conduct an irritation and sensitization study to demonstrate
the skin safety of the product and a pivotal clinical efficacy trial to demonstrate that transdermal FSH is not inferior to subcutaneous
injection. We intend to seek to utilize the 505(b)(2) NDA regulatory pathway to register the product with the FDA which allows us to
reference the know safety of FSH on file at FDA for the reference listed drug and the safety information that has been published in the
literature. We have not yet communicated with the FDA on our proposed development plan or registration plan and we cannot assure you
that the FDA will agree to our use of the 505(b)(2) pathway. Transdermal FSH is currently in the preclinical phase of development.
In addition, we may seek to develop certain generic
transdermal products where we think we can efficiently make an improvement to existing patches and potentially take significant market
share with good profit margins.
The prioritization of our portfolio of product
candidates will be reviewed on an ongoing basis and will take into account technical progress, market potential, available funding and
commercial interest. Our ability to take any meaningful steps to the development of any of these products is determined by our ability
to provide sufficient funding for such activities. As stated above, without additional financing or a joint venture agreement we will
not be able to take any steps to the development of any of these products.
We currently have no branded OTC or Consumer
products nor do we plan to launch any OTC or Consumer products in the near term as our focus is primarily on our pharmaceutical development
pipeline and continuing the contract services offered by both 4P Therapeutics and Pocono Pharma.
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing and Supply
Manufacturing of our pharmaceutical transdermal
products in development will be performed in compliance with FDA current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) and all applicable local
regulations by contract manufacturers. All manufacturing processes and facilities will be subject to review by the FDA during development,
prior to approval and during subsequent routine FDA inspections. We plan to continue to rely on contract manufacturers and, potentially,
collaboration partners to manufacture commercial quantities of our products, if and when approved for marketing by the FDA.
Employees
As of January 31, 2022, the Company has 13 full
time employees, of which five are officers of the Company. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we consider our
employee relations to be good.
Government Regulation
United States
The pharmaceutical business is subject to extensive
government regulation. In the United States, we must comply with the rules and regulations of the FDA. In other countries we must comply
with the laws and regulations of each country to legally market and sell our products. Obtaining FDA approval does not mean that the
product will be approved in other countries. Each country may require that additional clinical and nonclinical studies be conducted prior
to approval.
The process required by the FDA to receive approval
prior to marketing and distributing a drug in the United States generally involves a preclinical phase followed by three phases of clinical
trials. The definition of drug is broadly defined and includes the pharmaceutical products we have in development. Even though the drug
used in each of our proposed products is currently approved by the FDA in other dosage forms, we will still need to conduct a development
program that will include preclinical and clinical trials before we receive FDA marketing approval. The FDA also has a number of abbreviated
approval pathways which, if we are eligible, could shorten the time for approval. For example, the regulatory path for the AVERSA products
in development is intended follow a 505(b)(2) NDA regulatory pathway which reduce the amount of clinical work that needs to be performed
to a single trial to evaluate the abuse potential of the product as the safety and efficacy of the drug has already been established.
However, we cannot be certain that we will be able to use any abbreviated approval pathway, in which event we will need to comply with
the full regulatory pathway as described below.
The full (although not typical for the AVERSA
related products) FDA regulatory pathway consists of the following phases of development.
| ● | Preclinical
phase. Before a drug company can test an experimental treatment in humans, it must prove
the drug is safe and effective in animals. Scientists run tests in various animals before
presenting the data to the FDA as an investigational new drug application. For already approved
drugs, an animal study may not be required prior to testing in humans. In most cases, the
company must file an Investigational New Drug (IND) submission to get clearance to test the
product in humans. |
| ● | Phase
one clinical trial. In the first round of clinical trials, the drug company attempts
to establish the drug’s safety in humans. Drug researchers administer the treatment
to healthy individuals — instead of patients suffering from the disease or condition
the drug is intended to treat — and gradually increase the dose to see if the drug
is toxic at higher levels or if any possible side effects occur. These drug trials are usually
small, containing about 20 to 80 participants, according to the FDA. For drug delivery products
incorporating already approved drugs, Phase 1 studies involve measuring blood levels of the
drug to understand the pharmacokinetics for a new route of administration. |
| ● | Phase
two clinical trial. In the second round of clinical trials, researchers give the treatment
to patients who have the disease to assess the drug’s efficacy. The trial is randomized,
meaning half of the study participants receive the drug and half receive a placebo. These
trials usually contain hundreds of participants, according to the FDA. There is about a 30
percent chance of a drug moving on to a phase three clinical trial, according to data from
the biotech trade organization BIO. For already approved drugs, as is the case with drug
delivery products, a Phase 2 trial may not be necessary as the therapeutic drug doses and
blood concentrations are already known. However, a Phase 2 may be conducted to inform the
design of the Phase 3 clinical trial in regards to the safety and efficacy of the product
when used by patients. |
| ● | Phase
three clinical trial. In the third phase of clinical trials, researchers work with the
FDA to design a larger trial to test the drug’s ideal dosage, patient population and
other factors that could decide whether the drug is approved, according to the report. These
trials usually contain a few hundred to thousands of participants. In the case of drug delivery
products that utilize an approved drug, Phase 3 trials will typically include a comparison
to the already approved reference product. For example a transdermal patch may be compared
to an injection. |
| ● | New
drug application. Once a drug company collects and analyzes all data from the clinical
trials, it submits a new drug application to the FDA. The application includes trial data,
preclinical information and details on the drug’s manufacturing process. If the FDA
accepts the application for review, the agency has ten months — or six months if the
drug has priority review status — to make a decision, according to the report. The
FDA can hold an advisory committee meeting where independent experts assess the data and
recommend whether to approve the drug. From there, the FDA will either approve the drug or
give the applicant a complete response letter, which explains why the drug did not get approved
and what steps the applicant must take before resubmitting the application for approval. |
Before approving an NDA, the FDA may inspect
the facilities where the product is being manufactured or facilities that are significantly involved in the product development and distribution
process and will not approve the product unless compliance with current good manufacturing practices is satisfactory. The FDA may deny
approval of an NDA if applicable statutory or regulatory criteria are not satisfied, or may require additional testing or information,
which can delay the approval process. In pursuing FDA approval there may be various delays and it is possible that approval may never
be granted. In addition, new government requirements may be established that could delay or prevent regulatory approval of our product
candidates under development.
If a product is approved, the FDA may impose
limitations on the indications for use for which the product may be marketed, may require that warning statements be included in the
product labeling, may require that additional studies or trials be conducted following approval as a condition of the approval, may impose
restrictions and conditions on product distribution, prescribing or dispensing in the form of a risk management plan, or impose other
limitations.
Once a product receives FDA approval, marketing
the product for other indicated uses or making certain manufacturing or other changes related to the product will require FDA review
and approval of a supplemental NDA or a new NDA, which may require additional clinical safety and efficacy data and may require additional
review fees. In addition, further post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of a product may be required.
Also, product approvals may be withdrawn if compliance with regulatory standards is not maintained or if safety or manufacturing problems
occur following initial marketing.
With respect to the labeling for our abuse deterrent
transdermal fentanyl system or any other opioid transdermal patch we develop, it is likely that we will need to disclose the risks of
improper use or abuse using language required by the FDA.
FDA Approval Pathways
The FDA has several pathways that can be followed
to obtain FDA approval.
| ● | A
stand-alone NDA is an application submitted under Section 505(b)(1) of the Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act (“FD&C Act”) and approved under Section 505(c) of the FD&C
Act that contains full reports of investigations of safety and effectiveness that were conducted
by or for the applicant or for which the applicant has a right of reference or use. This
is typically the pathway used for new chemical entities. |
| ● | A
505(b)(2) application is an NDA submitted under Section 505(b)(1) and approved under Section
505(c) of the FD&C Act that contains full reports of investigations of safety and effectiveness,
where at least some of the information required for approval comes from studies not conducted
by or for the applicant and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference
or use. This is the pathway typically taken for off-patent drugs that are being development
into alternate dosage forms or routes of administration. |
| ● | An
ANDA is an application for a duplicate of a previously approved drug product that was submitted
and approved under Section 505(j) of the FD&C Act. An ANDA relies on the FDA’s
finding that the previously approved drug product is safe and effective. An ANDA generally
must contain information to show that the proposed generic product (1) is the same as the
drug with respect to the active ingredients, conditions of use, route of administration,
dosage form, strength and labeling (with certain permissible differences) and (2) is bioequivalent
to the referenced drug. An ANDA may not be submitted if studies are necessary to establish
the safety and effectiveness of the proposed product. This is the pathway taken for generic
drugs. |
We cannot assure you that we will be able to
take advantage of any of the available abbreviated approval pathways for any of our proposed products.
Post-approval requirements
Any drug products for which we receive FDA approval
will be subject to continuing regulation by the FDA. Certain requirements include, among other things, record-keeping requirements, reporting
of adverse events with the product, providing the FDA with updated safety and efficacy information on an annual basis or more frequently
for specific events, product sampling and distribution requirements, complying with certain electronic records and signature requirements
and complying with FDA promotion and advertising requirements. These promotion and advertising requirements include, among others, standards
for direct-to-consumer advertising, prohibitions against promoting drugs for uses or patient populations that are not described in the
drug’s approved labeling, known as “off-label use,” and other promotional activities, such as those considered to be
false or misleading. Failure to comply with FDA regulations can have negative consequences, including the immediate discontinuation of
noncomplying materials, adverse publicity, enforcement letters from the FDA, mandated corrective advertising or communications with doctors,
and civil or criminal penalties. Such enforcement may also lead to scrutiny and enforcement by other government and regulatory bodies.
Although physicians may prescribe legally available
drugs for off-label uses, manufacturers may not encourage, market or promote such off-label uses. As a result, “off-label promotion”
has formed the basis for litigation under the Federal False Claims Act, violations of which are subject to significant civil fines and
penalties. In addition, manufacturers of prescription products are required to disclose annually to the Center for Medicaid and Medicare
any payments made to physicians and teaching hospitals in the U.S. under the federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act. Reportable payments
may be direct or indirect, in cash or kind, for any reason, and are required to be disclosed even if the payments are not related to
the approved product. Failure to fully disclose or not in time reporting could lead to penalties up to $1.15 million per year.
The manufacturing of any of our products will
be required to comply with the FDA’s current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) regulations. These regulations require, among
other things, quality control and quality assurance, as well as the corresponding maintenance of comprehensive records and documentation.
Drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are also required to register with
the FDA their establishments and list any products they make and to comply with related requirements in certain states. These entities
are further subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies for compliance with current good manufacturing
practices and other laws. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production and quality
control to maintain cGMP compliance.
Discovery of problems with a product after approval
may result in serious and extensive restrictions on a product, manufacturer or holder of an approved NDA, as well as lead to potential
market disruptions. These restrictions may include recalls, suspension of a product until the FDA is assured that quality standards can
be met, and continuing oversight of manufacturing by the FDA under a “consent decree,” which frequently includes the imposition
of costs and continuing inspections over a period of many years, as well as possible withdrawal of the product from the market. In addition,
changes to the manufacturing process generally require prior FDA approval before being implemented. Other types of changes to the approved
product, such as adding new indications and additional labeling claims, are also subject to further FDA review and approval.
The FDA also may require post-marketing testing,
or Phase IV testing, as well as risk minimization action plans and surveillance to monitor the effects of an approved product or place
conditions on an approval that could otherwise restrict the distribution or use of our products.
Other Government Regulations
We may be subject to government regulations that
are applicable to businesses generally, including those relating to workers’ health and safety, environmental and waste disposal,
wage and hour and labor practices, including sexual harassment laws and regulations, and anti-discrimination laws and regulations.
In addition, we must comply with the laws and
regulations governing the research and manufacture of products containing controlled substances such as fentanyl and other opioids. We
or our contract manufacturer must be licensed by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and the state(s) in which we conduct research and
development activities.
Europe and Other Countries
If we market our products in any countries other
than the United States, we would be subject to the laws of those countries. To obtain market access for our products in other countries
we must comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of such countries regarding safety and efficacy and governing, among
other things, clinical trials and commercial sales, pricing and distribution of our products.
The European medicines regulatory system is based
on a network of around 50 regulatory authorities from the 31 countries in the European Economic Area, the European Commission and
the European Medicines Agency. All medicines must be authorized before they can be placed on the market in the European Union. The European
system offers different routes for authorization. A centralized procedure allows the marketing of a medicine on the basis of a single
European Union assessment and marketing authorization which is valid throughout the European Union. However, a majority of medicines
authorized in the European Union do not fall within the scope of the centralized procedure, and we do not know whether our proposed products
will fall within the centralized authorization. We also do not know how the withdrawal of Great Britain from the European Union will
affect the procedure for approval of medicines in the United Kingdom. If we are not able to use the centralized procedure, we would need
to use one of the following procedures. One method is the decentralized procedure where we would apply for the simultaneous authorization
in more than one European Union member. The second method is the mutual-recognition procedure where we would have a medicine authorized
in one European Union country apply for authorization to be recognized in other European Union countries. In either case, we would be
required to complete clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the medicine and show and that the medicine is manufactured
in accordance with good manufacturing practices based upon European Union standards.
In countries other than the United States and
the European Union, we would be required to comply with the applicable laws of those countries, which may require us to perform additional
clinical testing.
Failure to obtain regulatory approval in any
country would prevent our product candidates from being marketed in those countries. In order to market and sell our products in jurisdictions
other than the United States and the European Union, we must obtain separate marketing approvals and comply with numerous and varying
regulatory requirements. The regulatory approval process outside the United States and the European Union generally includes all of the
risks associated with obtaining FDA and European Union approval but can involve additional testing.
In addition, in many countries worldwide, it
is required that the product be approved for reimbursement before the product can be approved for sale in that country. We may not obtain
approvals from regulatory authorities outside the United States on a timely basis, if at all. Even if we were to receive approval in
the United States or the European Union, approval by the FDA or the European Medicines Agency does not ensure approval by regulatory
authorities in other countries or jurisdictions. Similarly, approval by one regulatory authority outside the United States would not
ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions. We may not be able to file for marketing approvals and
may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any market. If we are unable to obtain approval of our product candidates
by regulatory authorities in other foreign jurisdictions, the commercial prospects of those product candidates may be significantly diminished
and our business prospects could decline.
Outside the United States, particularly in member
states of the European Union, the pricing of prescription drugs is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations
or the successful completion of health technology assessment procedures with governmental authorities can take considerable time after
receipt of marketing approval for a product. In addition, there can be considerable pressure by governments and other stakeholders on
prices and reimbursement levels, including as part of cost containment measures.
In addition to regulations in the United States,
if we market outside of the United States, we will be subject to a variety of regulations governing, among other things, clinical trials
and any commercial sales and distribution of our products. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain the requisite
approvals from regulatory authorities in foreign countries prior to the commencement of clinical trials or marketing of the product in
those countries.
Intellectual Property
The AVERSA abuse deterrent technology utilized
in our AVERSA product pipeline is covered by an international intellectual property portfolio with patents issued in 44 countries including
the United States, Europe, Japan, Korea, Russia, Mexico, and Australia and with patents pending in Canada and China. These patents provide
patent coverage to 2035. We continue to build on our proprietary positions in the United States and internationally for our product candidates
AVERSA Fentanyl, AVERSA buprenorphine and AVERSA methylphenidate as well as other products and technology that we may have in development.
Our policy is to pursue, maintain and defend patent rights developed internally or acquired externally and to protect the technology,
inventions and improvements that are commercially important to the development of our business. We cannot be sure that patents will be
granted with respect to any of our pending patent applications or with respect to any patent applications filed by us in the future,
nor can we be sure that any of our existing patents or any patents granted to us in the future will be commercially useful in protecting
our technology. We also rely on trade secrets to protect our commercial products and product candidates. Our commercial success also
depends in part on our non-infringement of the patents or proprietary rights of third parties. For a more comprehensive discussion of
the risks related to our intellectual property, please see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property”
appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Further, we plan to seek trademark protection
in the United States and internationally where available and when appropriate. We have registered the name Nutriband in the United States.
We have received a notice of allowance for the AVERSA trademark for our abuse deterrent technology in the United States.
Competition
The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive
and subject to rapid change as new products are developed and marketed. Potential competitors include large pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies, specialty pharmaceutical and generic drug companies, and medical technology companies. We believe the key competitive factors
that will affect the development and commercial success of our products are product performance including safety and efficacy, level
of patient compliance, healthcare professional acceptance, and the extent of insurance reimbursement of our products.
As our development pipeline includes products
that contain opioids (AVERSA Fentanyl and AVERSA Buprenorphine), we continually monitor the market for opioid products, particularly
in the United States. Pharmaceutical companies engaged in the distribution and sale of opioids, in particular for the treatment of chronic
pain, are promoting responsible opioid use. Our opioid products potentially offer a unique proposition to meet the unmet needs of patients
by deterring the abuse and misuse of opioids while making opioids accessible to those patients who need them. If approved, our AVERSA
pipeline products will compete with the currently marketed products that do not contain abuse deterrent features as well as other products
that may employ different abuse deterrent technology. We may also have to compete with products that do not contain opioids or other
drugs that are susceptible to abuse. We are not aware of any abuse deterrent transdermal products that are in development or being marketed
at this time. If we obtain regulatory approval to market our products, we cannot assure you that we will be successful in the marketplace.
Property
We do not own any real property. We lease under
a one year lease an office for $ 2,500 per month at 121 South Orange Street, Orlando, Florida. With the office lease, we have access
to board rooms, kitchen facilities and administrative support services. We lease manufacturing space in Cherryville, North Carolina,
for $3,000 per month under a three-year lease entered into on February 1, 2022, with a renewal option.
Legal Proceedings
On August 10, 2018, we, our chief executive officer
and our chief financial officer received a Wells notice from the enforcement division staff of the Miami Regional Office of the SEC in
connection with an investigation into the accuracy of certain statements in our Form 10 registration statement filed June 2, 2016, as
amended, and our Form 10-K annual report filed May 8, 2017. The staff’s inquiry was focused on our disclosure language in those
filings relating to the FDA requirements for our consumer transdermal patch products in that our filings did not accurately reflect the
FDA’s jurisdiction over our consumer products and did not disclose that we could not legally market these products in the United
States. On September 7, 2018, we and the officers filed a Wells submission in response. After engaging in settlement discussions with
the staff about the matters under investigation, we and the officers submitted an offer of settlement to resolve the investigation without
admitting or denying any violations of the federal securities laws.
On December 26, 2018, the SEC announced that
it has accepted the settlement offer and instituted settled administrative cease-and-desist proceedings against us and the named officers.
The SEC’s administrative order, dated December 26, 2018, finds that we and the officers consented – without admitting or
denying any findings by the SEC– to cease-and-desist orders against them for violations by us of Sections 12(g) and 13(a) of the
Exchange Act 1934 and Rules 12b-20 and 13a-1 thereunder, which require issuers to file accurate registration statements and annual reports
with the SEC; violations by the officers for causing our violations of the above issuer reporting provisions; and violations by the officers
of Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act, which requires each principal executive and principal financial officer of issuers to attest that
annual reports filed with the SEC do not contain any untrue statements of material fact. In addition to consenting to the cease-and-desist
orders, the officers have each agreed to pay a $25,000 civil penalty to resolve the investigation. The administrative order does not
impose a civil penalty or any other monetary relief against us.
On July 27, 2018, we commenced an action in the
Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida, against Advanced Health Brands, Inc., Raymond Kalmar,
Paul Murphy, Michelle Polly-Murphy, Laura Fillman and John Baker, together with a Motion for Temporary Injunction Without Notice and
a Motion for Prejudgment Writ of Replevin arising from our decision to seek to rescind for misrepresentation the agreement by which we
acquired advanced Health Brands, Inc. for 1,250,000 shares of common stock valued at $2,500,000 and seek return of the shares. On August
2, 2018, the court entered a Temporary Injunction Without Notice and an Order to Show Cause against the defendants. Defendants Kalmar,
Murphy, Polly-Murphy, and Baker filed a Motion to Dismiss our Verified Complaint, Motion to Dissolve Temporary Injunction Without Notice
and Response to Order to Show Cause, and Motion to Compel Arbitration. On January 4, 2019, the court dismissed our complaint with prejudice,
and directed the defendants to assign to us within 30 days, the six patents never duly transferred to us. On February 1, 2019, we appealed
the court’s order. Pursuant to a settlement agreement with one of the defendants, that defendant returned the 50,000 shares which
had been issued to her, and the shares were cancelled as of January 31, 2019. On June 7, 2019, the individual defendants (other than
the defendant whom we have a settlement agreement), filed a motion for sanctions and civil contempt against us, which generally claimed
that we failed to comply with the Court’s January 4, 2019 order by refusing to issue the Ruling 144 letters that would allow the
defendants to transfer their shares of common stock. On October 29, 2019, the Court denied the defendants motion. On March 20, 2020,
the Florida district court of appeal reversed the lower court ruling in the Florida state court action that dismissed our complaint with
prejudice and gave us leave to file an amended complaint.
On August 22, 2018, four of the defendants in
the Florida action described in the previous paragraph filed a complaint against us in the Franklin County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas
seeking a declaratory judgment permitting them to sell the shares of common stock they received pursuant to the acquisition agreement.
The parties have agreed to a stay pending the outcome of the Florida litigation.
On April 29, 2019, we filed a securities fraud
action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York against Raymond Kalmar, Paul Murphy, Michelle Polly-Murphy, Advanced
Health Brands and TD Therapeutic, Inc. In the complaint we allege that in 2017, the defendants fraudulently and deceitfully obtained
1,250,000 shares of common stock by orchestrating a months-long scheme to defraud us. We are seeking the return of the 1,200,000 shares
of common stock and monetary damages resulting from the defendants’ fraudulent conduct. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss
on August 23, 2019, and we filed our response on September 13, 2019. On July 20, 2020, the Court denied the defendant’s motion
to dismiss the complaint, and the parties have recently commenced the discovery phase of the litigation. The Court has scheduled a trial
on June 30 and July 1, 2022.
MANAGEMENT
Executive Officers and Directors
Set forth below is certain information with respect
to our directors and executive officers:
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Gareth Sheridan |
|
32 |
|
Chief executive
officer and director |
Serguei Melnik |
|
49 |
|
Chairman of the Board and
President |
Gerald Goodman |
|
74 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Alan Smith, Ph.D. |
|
56 |
|
Chief operating officer
and president of 4P Therapeutics |
Patrick Ryan |
|
36 |
|
Chief technical officer |
Jeff Patrick, Pharm.D. |
|
52 |
|
Chief scientific officer |
Larry Dillaha, MD |
|
57 |
|
Chief medical officer |
Radu Bujoreanu |
|
52 |
|
Director |
Mark Hamilton |
|
37 |
|
Director |
Stefan Mancas |
|
45 |
|
Director |
Irina Gram |
|
34 |
|
Director |
Gareth Sheridan, our founder, has been chief
executive officer and a director since our organization in 2016. In 2012, Mr. Sheridan founded Nutriband Ltd., an Irish company which
we acquired in 2016. Mr. Sheridan was named Ireland’s ‘Young Entrepreneur of the Year’ in 2014 in the National Bank
of Ireland Startup Awards for establishing Nutriband Ltd. Mr. Sheridan has further business awards from S. Dublin’s Best Young
Entrepreneur and Nutriband Ltd as S. Dublin’s Best Startup Company. Mr. Sheridan has also worked as a Business Mentor with 100
Minds, a social enterprise founded in 2013, that brings together some of Ireland’s top college students and connects them with
one cause to achieve large charitable goals in a short space of time. Mr. Sheridan is also a past Nissan Generation Next Ambassador,
receiving the acknowledgement in 2015 by Nissan Ireland as one of Ireland’s future generational leaders.
In 2019 Mr. Sheridan served on the Board of the
St. James Hospital foundation, the charitable foundation for Ireland’s largest public hospital. Mr. Sheridan received a B.Sc. in
Business and Management from Dublin Institute of Technology in 2012 where he concentrated on international economics, venture creation
and entrepreneurship.
Serguei Melnik, who was elected by the Board
as President on October 8, 2021, serves as a member of the board of directors and is a co-founder of Nutriband Inc. Mr Melnik has previously
served as our chief financial officer and a director since January 2016. Mr. Melnik has been involved in general business consulting
for companies in the U.S. financial markets and setting up legal and financial framework for operations of foreign companies in the U.S.
Mr. Melnik advised UNR Holdings, Inc. with regard to the initiation of the trading of its stock in the over-the-counter markets in the
U.S., and has provided general advice with respect to the U.S. financial markets for companies located in the U.S. and abroad. From February
2003 to May 2005, he was the Chief Operations Officer and a Board member of Asconi Corporation, Winter Park, Florida, with regard to
restructuring the company and listing it on the American Stock Exchange. Mr. Melnik from June 1995 to December 1996 was a lawyer in the
Department of Foreign Affairs, JSC Bank “Inteprinzbanca,”, Chisinau, Moldova, and prior thereto practiced law in Moldova
in various positions. Mr. Melnik is fluent in Russian, Romanian, English and Spanish.
Radu Bujoreanu has been a director since June
2019. Mr. Bujoreanu has been the owner and executive director of Consular Assistance, Inc., which provides assistance in obtaining visas
for the Republic of Moldova and related services since December 2002, and he has been a real estate agent with Keller Williams Realty,
Inc. since May 2019. Mr. Bujoreanu received his Bachelor in International Public Law from the University of Moldova.
Mark Hamilton, an independent director since
July 2018, is an experienced director level professional who has recently joined global consulting firm, Korn Ferry as a Managing Consultant.
Prior to moving into organizational consulting, Mark qualified as a Chartered Accountant in global advisory firm, BDO, where he spent
12 years advising some of Ireland’s most successful businesses. His work originated in corporate finance/corporate recovery and
more recently, he spent 5 years leading BDO’s client management and sales function, as Head of Business Development. Mr. Hamilton
is a Member of the Association of Chartered Accountants (ACA), since 2012. Mr. Hamilton’s accounting / consulting background and
experience in corporate finance, restructuring, sales and talent assists us in his role as an independent Board member and Committee
Chair. Mr. Hamilton has a very strong presence in the business community across jurisdictions, along with an accomplished track record
in project management and business development. Educated at Terenure College, Mark went on to study a B.Sc. degree in Business &
Management at Dublin Institute of Technology and subsequently received First Class Honours in his postgraduate degree, for which he specialized
in Accountancy in 2009. In addition to his ACA qualification, Mark has also recently completed a diploma in Corporate Governance and
is now a member of the Corporate Governance Institute which will assist him in his role as Independent Director.
Dr. Stefaní Mancas graduated Summa cum
Laude from the Military Navy College in Constanta, Romania. After attending the faculty of Cybernetics from the Academy of Economic Studies
in Bucharest, he transferred to University of Central Florida, where she graduated with a dual B.Sc. in Mathematics and Aerospace Engineering,
and a Ph. D. in Mathematical Sciences from the Department Mathematics. Her dissertation topic was “Dissipative solitons in the
cubic-quintic complex Ginzburg-Landau equation: Bifurcations and Spatiotemporal Structure”, for which she received the UCF Outstanding
Dissertation Award. Currently, Dr. Mancas is a tenured full Professor, and a researcher, in the Department of Mathematics at Embry-Riddle
Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Florida. Her main research areas are finding analytical solutions to nonlinear evolution equations,
and numerical simulations of nonlinear dissipative systems, such nonlinear Schrödinger equation with applications to quantum mechanics
and biomathematics. Dr. Mancas is using techniques involving complex analysis and elliptic functions with applications to water waves,
soliton theory, biological systems, and cosmology/inflation for nonlinear evolution equations, as well as applying special functions
to problems involving optimization of the blockchain, where elliptic functions are used for cryptography. Dr. Mancas is the organizer
of national and international conferences in mathematical physics, and as an associate editor she constantly reviews research articles
for many scientific journals. Dr. Mancas holds a strong record of publications with over seventy refereed articles, and she is constantly
invited to attend workshops, and speak in seminars all over the world.
Irina Gram was elected as a director of the Company
at the January 21, 2022 stockholders meeting. Irina is a new member of our Board, and is a Senior Financial Analyst at Thales IFEC, Melbourne,
Florida. There she is responsible for financial planning, analysis and risk and opportunities reviews of multiple development and customer
programs. From 2016 to 2017, she was a Project Engineering Coordinator at Thales IFEC, where she executed budgeting and forecasting activities
with specialized focus on SFRD spending, interfaced with engineering team to monitor and report the performance of the financial impact
of projects. From 2013 to 2016, she held various project management, accounting and reporting positions with Siemens Building Technology,
Inc., Winter Park, Florida. She received a Bachelor’s Degree in Finance from the University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida,
where she graduated in May 2015, with honors, and received a Masters in Business Administration from the University of Central Florida,
Orlando, Florida, in May 2019.
Gerald Goodman has been our chief accounting
officer since July 31, 2018, and was elected our Chief Financial Officer on November 12, 2020. Mr. Goodman is a certified public accountant
and, since 2014, has practiced with his own firm, Gerald Goodman CPA P.C. From January 1, 2010 until December 31, 2014, Mr. Goodman practiced
with Madsen & Associates, CPA’s Inc., Murray, Utah, and was a non-equity partner and managed the firm’s SEC practice.
Mr. Goodman is a director of Lifestyle Medical Network, Inc., which provides management services to healthcare providers. From 1971 to
2010, Mr. Goodman was a partner in the accounting firm of Wiener, Goodman & Company P.C. Mr. Goodman is a 1970 graduate of Pennsylvania
State University where he received a B.S. Degree in Accounting.
Alan Smith, Ph.D., serves as Chief Operating
Officer of Nutriband and President of 4P Therapeutics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Nutriband. He joined the Company after Nutriband
acquired 4P Therapeutics in 2018. Dr. Smith co-founded 4P Therapeutics in 2011 to develop drug-device and biologic-device combination
products to meet the needs of patients, physicians, and payers, and was Vice President, Clinical, Regulatory, Quality and Operations
at the time of the acquisition. Dr. Smith is co-inventor of the Company’s Aversa™ abuse deterrent transdermal system technology.
Dr. Smith has over 20 years of experience in the research and development of drug and biologic delivery systems, diagnostics and medical
devices for treatment and management of chronic pain, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Previously, he was with Altea Therapeutics,
a venture capital funded company focused on novel transdermal drug and biologic delivery, most recently serving as Vice President, Product
Development and Head of Clinical R&D, Regulatory Affairs, and Project Management. Prior to joining Altea Therapeutics, he led the
development of transdermal glucose monitoring systems at SpectRx, Inc., a publicly traded noninvasive diagnostics company. Dr. Smith
received Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in Biomedical Engineering from Rutgers University and the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New
Jersey. He currently serves on the Editorial Advisory Board of Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery.
Paddy Ryan has been chief technical officer since
February 2018. Having worked in the tech industry for 8 years, Paddy brings a fresh perspective and understanding to our team. From September
2019 to present Mr. Ryan served as director of digital agency for Trigger Media. From 2013 to 2016, Mr. Ryan worked as an online security
analyst with Paddy Power Betfair Plc. From 2016 to 2017, Mr. Ryan was general manager at CRS Events setting up and organising One-Zero,
the largest sports conference in Ireland. Mr Ryan served as head of technology for Irish agency Trigger Movement between 2017 and 2019.
Mr Ryan serves as technical advisor for sports media brand, Pundit Arena, where he has advised on their technical development since 2012.
Mr Ryan also served as a digital consultant for Irish Aid Charity, Bóthar, where he worked on the development of the charity’s
digital plans plans. Mr. Ryan has also consulted with Irish Local Government in County Limerick (Limerick County Council) regarding their
digital activity in September 2018. Mr. Ryan has also assisted Swiss Company, SEBA Crypto AG, to develop their online presence in October
2018. Mr. Ryan is also a technical advisor for Irish dairy company, Arrabawn where he has assisted them with online strategies since
2017. Mr. Ryan has been involved in general technical consulting for startups and companies in Ireland for more than ten years. Mr. Ryan
attended University College Dublin where he studied engineering and is working towards his masters in data analytics from National College
of Ireland. Mr Ryan also assisted in the development and launch of the Pandemic Action Network website in early 2020. As CTO, Paddy is
responsible for Nutriband’s technology strategy and plays a key role in leading new initiatives. Mr. Ryan works for us on a part-time
basis.
Jeff Patrick Pharm.D. currently serves as Director
of Drug Development Institute at the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. Dr. Patrick most recently serving as Chief Scientific
Officer for New Haven Pharmaceuticals. Prior roles included global vice president of professional affairs at Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.; and roles with ascending responsibilities at Dyax, Myogen/Gilead, Actelion and Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc. Dr. Patrick is a residency-trained
clinical pharmacist with approximately 20 years of pharmaceutical industry experience. He brings expertise in executive leadership, scientific
and medical strategy, drug development and commercialization to the company. Prior to pursuing a career in research and development,
Patrick was an ambulatory care clinical pharmacist at the University of Tennessee Medical Center and a clinical assistant professor of
pharmacy at the University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, where he earned his doctorate in pharmacy. He also completed the Wharton
School of Business Pharmaceutical Executive Program. Dr. Patrick works for us on a part-time basis.
Dr. Dillaha brings nearly 20 years of pharmaceutical
industry experience to Nutriband. Prior to joining Nutriband, he was chief executive officer of Repros Therapeutics from February 2017
to February 2018. Prior to joining Repros, Dr. Dillaha was the chief executive officer of CavtheRx, an inception stage biotechnology
company, from June 2016 to February 2017, and chief operating officer and chief medical officer of New Haven Pharmaceuticals, a specialty
pharmaceutical company. He also served as chief medical officer of Insys Therapeutics, Sciele Pharma and as Medical Director of Sanofi-Sythelabo.
Dr. Dillaha received an M.D. degree from the University of Tennessee, Memphis. Dr. Dillaha works for us on a part-time basis.
Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight
Gareth Sheridan serves as Chief Executive Officer
and Serguei Melnik is serving as our President, and following the Annual Meeting, it is expected that Serguei Melnik will commence serving
as our Chairman. Our Chairman leads the Board of Directors in its discussions and has such other duties as are prescribed by the Board.
As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Sheridan is responsible for implementing the Company’s strategic and operating objectives and day-to-day
decision-making related to such implementation.
The Board of Directors currently has three standing
committees (audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance) that are chaired and composed entirely of directors who are
independent under Nasdaq and SEC rules. Given the role and scope of authority of these committees, and that a majority of the Board of
Directors is composed of independent directors, the Board of Directors believes that its leadership structure is appropriate. We select
directors as members of these committees with the expectation that they will be free of relationships that might interfere with the exercise
of independent judgement.
Our Board of Directors is our Company’s
ultimate decision-making body, except with respect to those matters reserved to the stockholders. Our Board of Directors selects our
senior management team, which is charged with the conduct of our business. Our Board of Directors acts as an advisor and counselor to
senior management and oversees its performance. The position of the Chairman of our Board of Directors is served by one individual. We
have determined that the leadership structure of our Board of Directors is appropriate, especially given the early stage of our development
and the size of our Company.
The Board of Directors oversees our exposure
to risk through its interaction with management concerning matters related to financial, operational, regulatory, legal and strategic
risks. Risk assessment and oversight are an integral part of our governance and management processes. Our Board of Directors encourages
management to promote a culture that incorporates risk management into our corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations
Board Composition
Our business and affairs are managed under the
direction of our Board of Directors. The number of directors is determined by our board of directors, subject to the terms of our certificate
of incorporation and bylaws. Our board of directors currently consists of nine members, five of which are independent directors.
Meetings
Our Board of Directors acted by written consent
five times during 2022.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The board of directors has created three committees
- the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and corporate governance committee. Each of the committees has a
charter which meets the Nasdaq Stock Market requirements and is composed of three independent directors.
Audit Committee
The audit committee is comprised of Mr. Hamilton,
as chairman, Mr. Bujoreanu and Ms. Irina Gram. We believe that Mark Hamilton qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert”
under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The audit committee oversees, reviews, acts on and reports on various auditing and accounting
matters to the board, including: the selection of our independent accountants, the scope of our annual audits, fees to be paid to the
independent accountants, the performance of our independent accountants and our accounting practices, all as set forth in our audit committee
charter.
Compensation Committee
The compensation committee is comprised of Dr.
Mancas, Ms. Irina Gram and Mr. Bujoreanu, and is chaired by Ms. Gram. The compensation committee oversees the compensation of our chief
executive officer and our other executive officers and reviews our overall compensation policies for employees generally as set forth
in the audit committee charter. If so authorized by the board, the compensation committee may also serve as the granting and administrative
committee under any option or other equity-based compensation plans which we may adopt. The compensation committee will not delegate
its authority to fix compensation; however, as to officers who report to the chief executive officer, the compensation committee will
consult with the chief executive officer, who may make recommendations to the compensation committee. Any recommendations by the chief
executive officer are accompanied by an analysis of the basis for the recommendations. The committee will also discuss with the chief
executive officer and other responsible officers the compensation policies for employees who are not officers. The compensation committee
has the responsibilities and authority relating to the retention, compensation, oversight and funding of compensation consultants, legal
counsel and other compensation advisers. The compensation committee members will consider the independence of such advisors before selecting
or receiving advice from such advisors.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The nominating and corporate governance committee,
which is comprised of Mr. Hamilton, Dr. Mancas and Mr. Bujoreanu, and chaired by Mr. Bujoreanu, will identify, evaluate and
recommend qualified nominees to serve on our board; develop and oversee our internal corporate governance processes, and maintain a management
succession plan.
Independent Directors
Four of our directors, Radu Bujoreanu, Mark Hamilton,
Dr. Mancas and Irina Gram are independent directors based on the NASDAQ definition of independent director.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among our directors
and executive officers.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of our executive officers serve on the board
of directors or compensation committee of a company that has an executive officer who serves on our board or compensation committee.
No member of our board is an executive officer of a company in which one of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of
directors or compensation committee of that company.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity
securities to file with the SEC initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning
their ownership of the our common stock and other equity securities, on Form 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Melnik
filed late Form 5s for the year ended January 31, 2020. Mr. Goodman, Dr. Smith, Mr. Ryan, Dr. Patrick, Dr. Dillaha, Mr. Bujoreanu, Mr.
Hamilton, Dr. Mancas and Ms. Irina Gram have not filed their Form 3 reports.
Code of Ethics
Our board of directors has adopted a code of
ethics applicable to our employees, directors and officers, in accordance with applicable U.S. federal securities laws and the NASDAQ
regulations. Any waiver of this code may be made only by our board of directors and will be promptly disclosed as required by applicable
federal securities laws and the NASDAQ corporate governance rules. The Code of Ethics is available on our website at HTTPS://Nutriband.com/ethics.
Conflicts of Interest
Certain conflicts of interest exist and may continue
to exist between the Company and its officers and directors due to the fact that each has other business interests to which they devote
their primary attention. Each officer and director may continue to do so notwithstanding the fact that management time should be devoted
to the business of the Company.
Certain conflicts of interest may exist between
the Company and its management, and conflicts may develop in the future. The Company has not established policies or procedures for the
resolution of current or potential conflicts of interest between the Company, its officers and directors or affiliated entities. There
can be no assurance that management will resolve all conflicts of interest in favor of the Company, and conflicts of interest may arise
that can be resolved only through the exercise by management their best judgment as may be consistent with their fiduciary duties. Management
will try to resolve conflicts to the best advantage of all concerned.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Executive Compensation
The table below shows the compensation for services
in all capacities we paid during the years ended January 31, 2022 and 2021, to the individuals serving as our principal executive officers
during the last completed fiscal year and our other two most highly paid executive officers at the end of the last completed fiscal year
(whom we refer to collectively as our “named executive officers”);
Name and Principal Position | |
Year
| |
Salary $ | | |
Bonus Awards $ | | |
Stock Awards $ | | |
Option/
Awards(1) $ | | |
Incentive Plan Compensation
$ | | |
Nonqualified Deferred
Earnings $ | | |
All Other Compensation
$ | | |
Total $ | |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Gareth Sheridan,
CEO(3) | |
2022 | |
| 149,000 | | |
| 100,000 | | |
| | | |
| 61,778 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 310,770 | |
| |
2021 | |
| 60,000 | | |
| | | |
| 150,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 210,000 | |
| |
2020 | |
| 42,000 | | |
| 15,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 57,000 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Serguei Melnik | |
2022 | |
| 149,000 | | |
| 100,000 | | |
| - | | |
| 61,778 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 310,770 | |
President | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| - | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Alan Smith | |
2022 | |
| 148,000 | | |
| - | | |
| 84,000 | | |
| 32,654 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 264,654 | |
Chief Operating Officer | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Sean Gallagher, | |
2021 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 150,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | | |
| - | | |
| 150,000 | |
Executive Chairman1 | |
2020 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 60,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 60,000 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Jeff Patrick | |
2021 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Chief Scientific Officer2 | |
2020 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 60,000 | | |
| - | | |
| 252,700 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 312,700 | |
1 |
During the year ended January
31, 2021, the Company issued Mr. Gallagher 10,000 shares of common stock, valued at $150,000, as compensation. During the year ended
January 31, 2020, we issued to Mr. Gallagher 8,572 shares of common stock, valued at $120,000, representing his compensation for
the years ended January 31, 2019 and 2018 pursuant to his employment agreement. As of January 21, 2022, Mr. Gallagher is no longer
Executive Chairman. |
2 |
During the year ended January
31, 2020, we issued to Strategic Pharmaceutical Consulting LLC, a company controlled by Dr. Patrick 8,572 shares of common stock,
valued at $120,000, representing Dr. Patrick’s compensation for the years ended January 31, 2020 and 2019. We also granted
him to an option to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at 75% of the market price. The option expired unexercised. |
3 |
During the year ended January
31, 2021, we issued to Gareth Sheridan, our CEO, 10,000 shares of common stock valued at $150,000, representing compensation for
the year ended January 31, 2021. |
Non-Employee
Director Compensation Table
The
table below shows the cash fees paid to our directors in connection with their service on our board of directors, and the stock option
awards granted, during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2022.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name | |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | | |
Stock Awards ($) | | |
Option Awards ($) | | |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | | |
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Earnings ($) | | |
All Other Compensation ($) | | |
Total ($) | |
(a) | |
(b) | | |
(c) | | |
(d) | | |
(e) | | |
(f) | | |
(g) | | |
(h) | |
Mark Hamilton | |
| 5,000 | | |
| | | |
| 29,340 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 34,340 | |
Sean Gallagher | |
| 5,000 | | |
| | | |
| 32,500 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 37,500 | |
Radu Bujourneau | |
| 5,000 | | |
| | | |
| 26,120 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 31,120 | |
Stefani Mancas | |
| 5,000 | | |
| | | |
| 21,222 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 26,222 | |
Steven Damon | |
| 5,000 | | |
| | | |
| 16,325 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 21,325 | |
Vselovod Grigore | |
| 5,000 | | |
| | | |
| 16,325 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 21,325 | |
Employment Agreements with Company Officers
On January 21, 2022,
the Board of Directors of the Company approved Employment Agreements with Gareth Sheridan, our Chief Executive Officer, Serguei Melnik,
our President and Gerald Goodman, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.
Each of the three Employment
Agreements is effective February 1, 2022, for an initial term of three years, and the term is automatically extended for additional one-year
periods if neither party gives notice of termination at least 90 days prior to the end of the initial term or any current additional
one-year term.
The Employment Agreements
with Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Melnik each provide for a base salary of $250,000 per year, and the Employment Agreement with Mr. Goodman provides
for a base salary of $210,000.
On January 31, 2022, Mr. Gallagher resigned as a Director.
The Employment Agreements
provide for incentive payments as established by the Board of Directors, and the Employment Agreements with Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Melnik
provide for a performance bonus as follows:
Net Operating Profit Before Income Taxes | |
Performance Bonus | |
| |
| |
On the First $10 Million | |
| 3.5 | % |
| |
| | |
On the Next $40 Million | |
| 3.5 | % |
| |
| | |
On the Next $50 Million | |
| 3.0 | % |
| |
| | |
On all Amounts Over $100 Million | |
| 2.5 | % |
Each of the Employment
Agreements contains similar provisions for discharge for “cause”, including breach of the Employment Agreement or specified
detrimental conduct by the employee, in which cases accrued compensation would payable as provided in the Employment Agreements. The
Agreements also provide for termination by the executives for “good reason”, comprising events such as breach of the Agreement
by the Company, assignment of duties inconsistent with the Executive’s position, , or in the event of a change in control of the
Company. In the event of a termination by the Company without cause, or by the executive for “good reason”, the Company is
required to pay to the Executive in a lump sum in cash within 30 days after the date of termination the aggregate of the following amounts:
|
A. |
the sum of (1) the executive’s
annual minimum salary through the date of termination to the extent not theretofore paid, (2) any annual incentive payment earned
by the executive for a prior period to the extent not theretofore paid and not theretofore deferred, (3) any annual performance bonus
payment earned by the executive for a prior period to the extent not theretofore paid and not theretofore deferred,(4) any accrued
and unused vacation pay and (5) any business expenses incurred by the executive that are unreimbursed as of the date of
termination; |
|
B. |
The product of (1) the
performance bonus payment and (2) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days that have elapsed in the fiscal year of
the Company in which the date of termination occurs as of the date of termination, and the denominator of which is 365; |
|
C. |
the amount equal to the
sum of (1) three (3) times the executive’s annual minimum salary; (2) one (1) times the performance bonus payment
and (3) one (1) times the incentive payment; |
|
D. |
In the event executive
is not fully vested in any retirement benefits with the Company from pension, profit sharing or any other qualified or non-qualified
retirement plan, the difference between the amounts executive would have been paid if he or she had been vested on the date
his/her employment was terminated and the amounts paid or owed to the executive pursuant to such retirement plans; |
|
E. |
The product of (1) the
incentive payment and (2) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days that have elapsed in the fiscal year of the Company
in which the date of termination occurs as of the date of termination, and the denominator of which is 365; and |
|
F. |
If applicable, the present
value of the amount equal to the sum of five (5) years’ Performance Bonus pay with such amount being calculated based on the
Performance Bonus paid to the Employee the year prior to Termination. |
In addition, all stock
options and warrants outstanding as of the date of termination and held by the executive shall vest in full and become immediately exercisable
for the remainder of their full term; all restricted stock shall no longer be restricted to the extent permitted by law, and the Company
will use its best efforts, at its sole cost to register such restricted stock as expeditiously as possible.
The Employment Agreements
of Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Melnik provide that, to the extent any payment under the Employment Agreement to the executive is subject to
the excise tax imposed by section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, the executive is entitled to a gross-up payment from the Company
to reimburse the executive for additional federal, state and local taxes imposed on executive by reason of the excise tax and the Company’s
payment of the initial taxes on such amount. The Company is also required to bear the costs and expenses of any proceeding with any taxing
authority in connection with the imposition of any such excise tax.
Director Compensation
The table below sets forth the amounts of compensation
paid to directors of the Company in the fiscal year ended January 31, 2021.
Name | |
Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash ($) | | |
Stock Awards ($) | | |
Option Awards ($) | | |
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($) | | |
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($) | | |
All Other
Compensation ($) | | |
Total ($) | |
(a) | |
(b) | | |
(c) | | |
(d) | | |
(e) | | |
(f) | | |
(g) | | |
(h) | |
Gareth Sheridan | |
| 60,000 | | |
| 150,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 210,000 | |
Serguei Melnik | |
| 26,000 | | |
| 150,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 176,000 | |
Sean Gallagher | |
| | | |
| 150,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 150,000 | |
Michael Myer | |
| 40,600 | | |
| 75,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 115,600 | |
Mark Hamilton | |
| | | |
| 187,500 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 187,500 | |
Radu Bujoreanu | |
| | | |
| 187,500 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 187,500 | |
Steven Damon | |
| | | |
| 150,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 150,000 | |
Stefan Mancas | |
| | | |
| 187,500 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 187,500 | |
Vsevolod Grigore | |
| | | |
| 75,000 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 75,000 | |
Pension Benefits
We currently have no plans that provide for payments
or other benefits at, following, or in connection with retirement of our officers.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
| |
Option Awards | | |
| |
Stock Awards | |
Name | |
Number of
Shares of
Common
Stock
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#) Exercisable | | |
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#) Unexercisable | | |
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#) | | |
Option
Exercise
Price ($) | | |
Option Expiration Date | |
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested (#) | | |
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested ($) | | |
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested (#) | | |
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested ($) | |
(a) | |
(b) | | |
(c) | | |
(d) | | |
(e) | | |
(f) | |
(g) | | |
(h) | | |
(i) | | |
(j) | |
Gareth Sheridan, CEO | |
| 20,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
$ | 5.34 | | |
January 21, 2025 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Serguei Melnik, President | |
| 20,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
$ | 5.34 | | |
January 21, 2025 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Alan Smith, COO | |
| 10,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
January 21, 2025 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Gerald Goodman, CFO | |
| 10,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
January 21, 2025 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Gerald Goodman, CFO | |
| 75,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
$ | 4.90 | | |
October 22, 2024 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Jeff Patrick, CSO | |
| 10,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
January 21, 2025 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| (1) | The
amounts reported represent the aggregate grant-date fair value of stock options awarded to
certain directors in 2022, calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board,
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, or ASC Topic 718. The amounts presented do not
correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by the named director upon vesting
of the applicable awards. |
Bonuses
Any bonuses granted
in the future will relate to meeting certain performance criteria that are directly related to areas within the named executive’s
responsibilities with the Company. As we continue to grow, more defined bonus programs may be established to attract and retain our employees
at all levels.
Other Director Compensation
There are no agreements
or arrangements by which any directors or nominees are to receive compensation or other payments from third parties in return for serving
on the Board of Directors.
Pension Benefits
We currently have no
plans that provide for payments or other benefits at, following, or in connection with retirement of our officers.
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table
provides information concerning the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common Stock by each director and nominee for director,
certain executive officers, and by all directors and officers of the Company as a group as of the Record Date. In addition, the table
provides information concerning the current beneficial owners, if any, known to the Company to hold more than five percent (5%) of the
outstanding common Stock of the Company.
The amounts and percentage
of stock beneficially owned are reported based on regulations of the securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) governing
the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner”
of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition
of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial
ownership within 60 days after December 15, 2021. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same
securities and a person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities in which he has no economic interest. The percentage of common
stock beneficially owned is based on 7,843,671 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 27, 2022.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) |
|
Shares of
Common Stock
Owned Directly |
|
|
Shares of
Derivative
Securities Owned |
|
|
Total
Beneficial
Ownership
Including
Option
Grants(5) |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Gareth Sheridan(5) |
|
|
1,510,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
1,530,000 |
|
|
|
19.51 |
% |
Serguei Melnik(2)(5) |
|
|
707,500 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
727,500 |
|
|
|
9.22 |
% |
Stefani Mancas(5) |
|
|
15,125 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
21,625 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mark Hamilton(5) |
|
|
14,750 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
23,750 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Radu Bujoreanu(5) |
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Dr. Jeff Patrick(3)(5) |
|
|
31,381 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
41,381 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Patrick Ryan(5) |
|
|
8,750 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Allan Smith(5) |
|
|
41,908 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
51,908 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Gerald Goodman(4)(5) |
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
107,500 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
% |
Dr. Larry Dillaha(5) |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Irina Gram |
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All officers and directors as a group (11 individuals) |
|
|
2,378,914 |
|
|
|
188,500 |
|
|
|
2,567,414 |
|
|
|
31.96 |
% |
(*) |
Less than One (1%) Percent. |
(1) |
The address for each director
and officer, unless indicated otherwise, is c/o Nutriband, Inc., 121 South Orange Ave., Suite 1500, Orlando, FL 32801. |
(2) |
Includes 25,000 shares
owned by Mr. Melnik’s wife, as to which Mr. Melnik disclaims beneficial interest, and 25,000 shares owned by each of his two
minor children. |
(3) |
Includes 21,072 shares
owned by Strategic Pharmaceutical Consulting, with respect to which Dr. Jeff Patrick, chief scientific officer, has the power to
vote and dispose of the shares. Mr. Patrick was granted a three-year option under the Company’s 2021 Employee Stock Option
Plan on January 21, 2022, to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.85 per share. |
(4) |
Gerald Goodman holds 22,500
shares directly and was granted a three-year option under the Company’s 2021 Employee Stock Option Plan on November 20, 2021
to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.85 per share. Mr. Goodman also was issued on October 22, 2021
a stock purchase warrant for the purchase of 75,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $4.90 per share. |
(5) |
On January 21, 2022, the
Board of Directors approved three-year stock option grants under the Company’s 2021 Employee Stock Option Plan for an aggregate
of 118,500 shares of common stock to employees and directors as compensation for services rendered in fiscal 2021, at a $4.85 per
share option price, except those options issued to Gareth Sheridan and Serguei Melnik, which are exercisable at $5.34 per share. |
|
To our knowledge, all beneficial
owners named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. |
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Issuance of Stock Options to Directors and Management
During the year ended January 31, 2021, Serguei
Melnik, a director and our former chief financial officer, and Dr. Alan Smith, our chief operating officer, advanced us $18,128, all
of which was repaid. As of January 31, 2021, the amount due each of these officers is $-0-.
On January 31, 2020, we issued 8,572 shares to
each of Sean Gallagher and to Strategic Pharmaceutical Consulting LLC, which is controlled by Jeff Patrick, for services rendered by
Mr. Gallaher and Dr. Patrick valued at $120,000. These issuances were made pursuant to employment agreements with Mr. Gallagher and Dr.
Patrick which provide for annual compensation of $60,000 and represented compensation for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
During the year ended January 31, 2021, Serguei
Melnik, our chief financial officer, and Dr. Alan Smith, our chief operating officer, advanced us $18,128, all of which was repaid. As
of January 31, 2021, the amounts due the officers was $-0-.
On January 5, 2021, the Company issued the following
numbers of shares common stock to Company officers and members of its Board of Directors. All stock issuances were valued by the Board
at $15.00 per share.
Gareth Sheridan, CEO and Director | |
| 10,000 | |
Sean Gallagher, Executive Chairman and Director* | |
| 10,000 | |
Serguei Melnik, Director | |
| 10,000 | |
Michael Myer, President of Pocono Pharma and Director | |
| 5,000 | |
Radu Bujoreanu, Director | |
| 12,500 | |
Steven P. Damon, Director | |
| 10,000 | |
Michael Doron, Director* | |
| 5,000 | |
Mark Hamilton, Director | |
| 12,500 | |
Stefani Mancas, Director | |
| 12,500 | |
Vsevolod Grigore, Director | |
| 5,000 | |
Patrick Ryan, Chief Technical Officer | |
| 5,000 | |
Gerald Goodman, Chief Financial Officer | |
| 10,000 | |
Alan Smith, Chief Operating Officer and President of 4P Therapeutics | |
| 6,825 | |
Vitalie Botgros, Consultant | |
| 5,000 | |
Thomas Cooney, Director* | |
| 6,000 | |
Jay Moore, Director* | |
| 5,000 | |
On January 21, 2022, the Company’s Board
approved issuances as set forth below to officers and directors of stock option awards under the Corporation’s 2021 Employee Stock
Option Plan which was approved by stockholders at the Annual Meeting and established the exercise price for the awards using the fair
value of the common stock closing price as of January 21, 2022. The exercise price for Gareth Sheridan and Serguei Melnik was $5.34 per
the terms of the Plan.
Name | |
Number of
Shares | | |
Per Share
Exercise
Price | | |
Consideration |
| |
| | |
| | |
|
Serguei Melnik | |
| 20,000 | | |
$ | 5.34 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Gareth Sheridan | |
| 20,000 | | |
$ | 5.34 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Gerald Goodman | |
| 10,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Patrick Ryan | |
| 10,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Larry Dillaha | |
| 10,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Jeff Patrick | |
| 10,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Mike Myer | |
| 10,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Sean Gallagher | |
| 10,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Mark Hamilton | |
| 9,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Radu Bujoreanu | |
| 8,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Stefani Mancas | |
| 6,500 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Steve Damon | |
| 5,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Vsevolod Grigore | |
| 5,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Tyler Overk | |
| 10,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Diana Mather | |
| 10,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Alan Smith | |
| 10,000 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
Services rendered in fiscal 2022 |
Director Independence
Five of our directors, Radu Bujoreanu, Steven
P. Damon, Mark Hamilton, Stefan Mancas and Vsevolod Grigore, are independent directors based on the NASDAQ definition of independent
director.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
Our authorized capital stock consists of 10,000,000
shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, none of which have been issued, and 250,000,000 shares of common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, of which 7,843,671 shares are issued and outstanding. Holders of our common stock are entitled to equal voting rights,
consisting of one vote per share on all matters submitted to a stockholder vote. Holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting
rights. Therefore, holders of a majority of the shares of common stock can elect all of our directors. The presence, in person or by
proxy duly authorized, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote are necessary to constitute a
quorum at any meeting of our stockholders. A vote by the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares is required to effectuate certain
fundamental corporate changes such as liquidation, merger or an amendment to our articles of incorporation. In the event of liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of our company, either voluntarily or involuntarily, each outstanding share of the common stock is entitled
to share equally in our assets.
Holders of our common stock have no pre-emptive
rights, no conversion rights and there are no redemption provisions applicable to our common stock. They are entitled to receive dividends
when and as declared by our board of directors, out of funds legally available therefore. We have not paid cash dividends in the past
and do not expect to pay any within the foreseeable future.
The board of directors has broad powers to create
one or more series of preferred stock and to designate the voting powers, designations, preferences, limitations, restrictions and relative
right of each series.
Warrants
Warrants Issued in the Offering
The following summary of certain terms and provisions
of the Warrants included in the Units offered hereby is not complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the provisions
of the warrant agent agreement between us and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as warrant agent.
Exercisability. The Warrants are
exercisable at any time after their original issuance and at any time up to the date that is five years after their original issuance.
The Warrants will be exercisable, at the option of each holder, in whole or in part by delivering to us a duly executed exercise notice
and, at any time a registration statement registering the issuance of the shares of common stock underlying the warrants under the Securities
Act is effective and available for the issuance of such shares, or an exemption from registration under the Securities Act is available
for the issuance of such shares, by payment in full in immediately available funds for the number of shares of common stock purchased
upon such exercise. If a registration statement registering the issuance of the shares of common stock underlying the Warrants under
the Securities Act is not effective or available and an exemption from registration under the Securities Act is not available for the
issuance of such shares, the holder may, in its sole discretion, elect to exercise the Warrant through a cashless exercise, in which
case the holder would receive upon such exercise the net number of shares of common stock determined according to the formula set forth
in the Warrant. No fractional shares of common stock will be issued in connection with the exercise of a Warrant. In lieu of fractional
shares, we will pay the holder an amount in cash equal to the fractional amount multiplied by the exercise price.
Exercise Limitation. A holder will not
have the right to exercise any portion of the warrant if the holder (together with its affiliates) would beneficially own in excess of
4.99% of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the exercise, as such percentage ownership
is determined in accordance with the terms of the Warrants. However, any holder may increase or decrease such percentage to any other
percentage not in excess of 9.99%, provided that any increase in such percentage shall not be effective until 61 days following notice
from the holder to us.
Exercise Price. The exercise price
per whole share of common stock purchasable upon exercise of the Warrants is $7.50 per share, which is 120% of public offering price
of the common stock. The exercise price is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions,
stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting our common stock and also upon any distributions of assets,
including cash, stock or other property to our stockholders.
Transferability. Subject to applicable
laws, the Warrants may be offered for sale, sold, transferred or assigned without our consent.
Exchange Listing. We have been approved
for listing of our common stock and the Warrants on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbols “NTRB,” and “NTRBW,”
respectively.
Warrant Agent. The transfer agent for
the common stock and warrant agent for the warrants is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (“AST”), 6201
15th Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11219, telephone (800) 937-5449.
The Warrants will be issued in registered form
under a warrant agent agreement between AST, as warrant agent, and us. The Warrants shall initially be represented only by one or more
global warrants deposited with the warrant agent, as custodian on behalf of The Depository Trust Company (DTC) and registered in the
name of Cede & Co., a nominee of DTC, or as otherwise directed by DTC.
Fundamental Transactions. In the
event of a fundamental transaction, as described in the Warrants and generally including any reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification
of our common stock, the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our properties or assets, our consolidation
or merger with or into another person, the acquisition of more than 50% of our outstanding common stock, or any person or group becoming
the beneficial owner of 50% of the voting power represented by our outstanding common stock, the holders of the warrants will be entitled
to receive upon exercise of the warrants the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property that the holders would have received
had they exercised the warrants immediately prior to such fundamental transaction.
Rights as a Stockholder. Except as
otherwise provided in the Warrants or by virtue of such holder’s ownership of shares of our common stock, the holder of a Warrant
does not have the rights or privileges of a holder of our common stock, including any voting rights, until the holder exercises the Warrant.
Governing Law. The Warrants and the warrant
agent agreement are governed by Delaware law.
Representative’s Warrants
As additional compensation to the underwriters
in the public offering, upon consummation of the offering we have issued to the designees of the underwriters warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 105,600 shares of our common stock (the “Underwriters’ Warrants”). The Underwriters’ Warrants may
not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, or hypothecated, or be the subject of any hedging, short sale, derivative, put, or call
transaction that would result in the effective economic disposition of the securities for a period of 180 days beginning on the date
of commencement of sales of this public offering. The Underwriters’ Warrants will be exercisable, in whole or in part, commencing
six months after the effective date of the registration statement related to this prospectus and will expire on the fifth anniversary
of the effective date of the registration statement related to this prospectus.
Nevada Law Provisions Relating to Certain
Transactions
Sections 78.378 through 78.3793 of the Nevada
Revised Statutes contains voting limitations on certain acquisitions of control shares. Sections 78.411 through 78.444 contain restrictions
of combinations with interested stockholders. The Nevada law defines an interested stockholder as a beneficial owner (directly or indirectly)
of 10% or more of the voting power of the outstanding shares of the corporation. In addition, combinations with an interested stockholder
remain prohibited for three years after the person became an interested stockholder unless (i) the transaction is approved by the board
of directors or the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares not beneficially owned by the interested party, or (ii) the interested
stockholder satisfies certain fair value requirements.
Limitation on liability of officers and directors
Nevada law provides that subject to certain very
limited statutory exceptions, a director or officer is not individually liable to the corporation or its stockholders or creditors for
any damages as a result of any act or failure to act in his or her capacity as a director or officer, unless it is proven that the act
or failure to act constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties as a director or officer and such breach of those duties involved
intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law. The statutory standard of liability established by NRS Section 78.138 controls
even if there is a provision in the corporation’s articles of incorporation unless a provision in the corporation’s articles
of incorporation provides for greater individual liability.
Indemnification
Nevada law permits broad provisions for indemnification
of officers and directors.
Our bylaws provide that each person who was or
is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is involved (including, without limitation, as a witness) in any threatened,
pending, or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether formal or informal, civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (hereinafter
a “proceeding”), by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director of or who is or was serving at our request as
a director, officer, employee or agent of this or another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, other enterprise, or
employee benefit plan (a “covered person”), whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity
as a covered person shall be indemnified and held harmless by us to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, as then in effect,
against all expense, liability and loss (including attorneys’ fees, costs, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties and
amounts to be paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by such person in connection therewith, and such indemnification shall
continue as to a person who ceased to be a covered person and shall inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors and administrators.
However, no indemnification shall be provided
hereunder to any covered person to the extent that such indemnification would be prohibited by Nevada state law or other applicable law
as then in effect, nor, with respect to proceedings seeking to enforce rights to indemnification, shall we indemnify any covered person
seeking indemnification in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person except where such proceeding (or part
thereof) was authorized by our board of directors, nor shall we indemnify any covered person who shall be adjudged in any action, suit
or proceeding for which indemnification is sought, to be liable for any negligence or intentional misconduct in the performance of a
duty.
SEC Policy on Indemnification for Securities
Act liabilities
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions,
we have been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Transfer Agent and Warrant Agent
The transfer agent for the common stock and warrant
agent for the warrants is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, 6201 15th Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11219, telephone
(800) 937-5449.
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE
SALE
Sale of Restricted Securities
We have 7,843,671 shares of common stock outstanding.
Of these shares, 5,446,252 shares are freely tradable, except that any shares purchased by our affiliates may generally only be sold
in compliance with Rule 144, which is described below. Of the remaining outstanding shares, the shares beneficially owned by our officers
and directors, will be deemed “restricted securities” under the Securities Act.
Rule 144
The shares of our common stock sold in this offering
will be freely transferable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act. Any shares of our common stock held
by an “affiliate” of ours may not be resold publicly except in compliance with the registration requirements of the Securities
Act or under an exemption under Rule 144 or otherwise. Rule 144 permits our common stock that has been acquired by a person who is an
affiliate of ours, or has been an affiliate of ours within the three months of the date of sale, to be sold into the market in an amount
that does not exceed, during any three-month period, the greater of:
|
● |
1% of the total number
of shares of our common stock outstanding; or |
|
● |
the average weekly reported
trading volume of our common stock for the four calendar weeks prior to the sale. |
Such sales are also subject to specific manner
of sale provisions, a six-month holding period requirement, notice requirements and the availability of current public information about
us.
Approximately 4,926,447 shares of our common
stock are eligible for sale under Rule 144. This number does not include the 1,200,000 shares held by the former stockholders of Advanced
Health Brands that are subject to lock-up arrangements and which are the subject of litigation described under “Business —
Legal Proceedings.”
Rule 144 also provides that a person who is not
deemed to have been an affiliate of ours at any time during the three months preceding a sale, and who has for at least six months beneficially
owned shares of our common stock that are restricted securities, will be entitled to freely sell such shares of our common stock subject
only to the availability of current public information regarding us. A person who is not deemed to have been an affiliate of ours at
any time during the three months preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned for at least one year shares of our common stock that
are restricted securities, will be entitled to freely sell such shares of our common stock under Rule 144 without regard to the current
public information requirements of Rule 144.
NUTRIBAND INC.
January 31, 2022
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Nutriband Inc.:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of Nutriband Inc. and Subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of January 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period
ended January 31, 2022 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of January
31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended January 31,
2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our
audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)
and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the
standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged
to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding
of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to
assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below
are matters arising from the current-period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated
to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved
our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way
our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing
a separate audit opinion on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Long-Lived Asset Impairment Assessment
Critical Audit Matter Description
As described in note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company performs impairment testing for its long-lived assets when events or changes in circumstances indicate
that its carrying amount may not be recoverable and exceeds its fair value. Due to challenging industry and economic conditions, the
Company tested its long-lived assets during the year ended January 31, 2022.
We identified the evaluation of the
impairment analysis for long-lived assets as a critical audit matter because of the significant estimates and assumptions management
used in the related cash flow analysis. Performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of these estimates and assumptions
required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was
Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the
following:
| ● | Testing
management’s process for developing the fair value estimate. |
| | |
| ● | Evaluating
the appropriateness of the cash flow model used by management. |
| | |
| ● | Testing
the completeness and accuracy of underlying data used in the fair value estimate. |
| | |
| ● | Evaluating
the significant assumptions used by management related to revenues, gross margin, other operating
expenses, income taxes and long-term growth rate to discern whether they are reasonable considering
(i) the current and past performance of the entity; (ii) the consistency with external market
and industry data; and (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained
in other areas of the audit. |
| | |
| ● | Professionals
with specialized skill and knowledge were utilized by the Firm to assist in the evaluation
of the discounted cash flow model and discount rate assumptions. |
Goodwill Impairment Assessment
Critical Audit Matter Description
As described in note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company tests goodwill for impairment annually at the reporting unit level, or more frequently, if events or
circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Reporting
units are tested for impairment by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying
amount of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, an impairment loss is recorded based on the difference between the fair
value and carrying amount, not to exceed the associated carrying amount of goodwill. The Company’s annual impairment test occurred
on January 31, 2022.
We identified the evaluation of the
impairment analysis for goodwill as a critical audit matter because of the significant estimates and assumptions management used in the
discounted cash flow analysis performed by management to determine fair value of the reporting unit. Performing audit procedures to evaluate
the reasonableness of these estimates and assumptions required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was
Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the
following:
| ● | Testing
management’s process for developing the fair value estimate. |
| | |
| ● | Evaluating
the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow model used by management. |
| | |
| ● | Testing
the completeness and accuracy of underlying data used in the fair value estimate. |
| | |
| ● | Evaluating
the significant assumptions used by management related to revenues, gross margin, other operating
expenses, income taxes, long term growth rate, and discount rate to discern whether they
are reasonable considering (i) the current and past performance of the entity; (ii) the consistency
with external market and industry data; and (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent
with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. |
| | |
| ● | Professionals
with specialized skill and knowledge were utilized by the Firm to assist in the evaluation
of the discounted cash flow model and discount rate assumptions. |
/s/ Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.
Draper, UT
April 28, 2022
NUTRIBAND INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
| |
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
ASSETS | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
CURRENT ASSETS: | |
| | |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
$ | 4,891,868 | | |
$ | 151,993 | |
Accounts receivable | |
| 71,380 | | |
| 109,347 | |
Inventory | |
| 131,648 | | |
| 52,848 | |
Prepaid expenses | |
| 370,472 | | |
| - | |
Total Current Assets | |
| 5,465,368 | | |
| 314,188 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT-net | |
| 979,297 | | |
| 1,076,626 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
OTHER ASSETS: | |
| | | |
| | |
Goodwill | |
| 5,349,039 | | |
| 7,529,875 | |
Right of use asset | |
| 19,043 | | |
| - | |
Intangible assets-net | |
| 926,913 | | |
| 1,006,730 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
TOTAL ASSETS | |
$ | 12,739,660 | | |
$ | 9,927,419 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
$ | 639,539 | | |
$ | 940,612 | |
Deferred revenue | |
| 106,267 | | |
| 86,846 | |
Operating lease liability | |
| 19,331 | | |
| - | |
Notes payable-related party, net | |
| - | | |
| 1,402,523 | |
Finance lease liabilities-current portion | |
| - | | |
| 24,740 | |
Notes payable-current portion | |
| 14,119 | | |
| 113,885 | |
Total Current Liabilities | |
| 779,256 | | |
| 2,568,606 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: | |
| | | |
| | |
Note payable-net of current portion | |
| 101,119 | | |
| 150,063 | |
Finance lease liabilities-net of currnt portion | |
| - | | |
| 96,804 | |
Total Liabilities | |
| 880,375 | | |
| 2,815,473 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Commitments and Contingencies | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | |
| | | |
| | |
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, -0- outstanding | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Common stock, $.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized; 7,871,359 and
6,256,770 shares issued at January 31, 2022 and 2021, 7,843,234 and 6,256,770 shares outstanding at January 31, 2022 and
2021, respectively | |
| 7,843 | | |
| 6,257 | |
Additional paid-in-capital | |
| 29,967,444 | | |
| 18,871,098 | |
Subscription payable | |
| - | | |
| 70,000 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | |
| (304 | ) | |
| (304 | ) |
Treasury stock, 28,125 shares at cost | |
| (104,467 | ) | |
| - | |
Accumulated deficit | |
| (18,011,231 | ) | |
| (11,835,105 | ) |
Total Stockholders’ Equity | |
| 11,859,285 | | |
| 7,111,946 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
$ | 12,739,660 | | |
$ | 9,927,419 | |
NUTRIBAND INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS |
| |
| |
| |
For the Years Ended | |
| |
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Revenue | |
$ | 1,422,154 | | |
$ | 943,702 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Costs and expenses: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cost of revenues | |
| 917,844 | | |
| 627,378 | |
Research and development expenses | |
| 411,383 | | |
| - | |
Goodwill impairment | |
| 2,180,836 | | |
| - | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | |
| 4,022,824 | | |
| 2,912,269 | |
Total Costs and Expenses | |
| 7,532,887 | | |
| 3,539,647 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Loss from operations | |
| (6,110,733 | ) | |
| (2,595,945 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Other income (expense): | |
| | | |
| | |
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt | |
| 53,028 | | |
| (9,162 | ) |
Early prepayment fee on convertible debentures | |
| - | | |
| (69,131 | ) |
Gain on change of fair value of derivative | |
| - | | |
| 22,096 | |
Interest expense | |
| (118,421 | ) | |
| (280,686 | ) |
Total other income (expense) | |
| (65,393 | ) | |
| (336,883 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Loss before provision for income taxes | |
| (6,176,126 | ) | |
| (2,932,828 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Provision for income taxes | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
| (6,176,126 | ) | |
| (2,932,828 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Deemed dividend related to warrant round-down | |
| (196,589 | ) | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss attributable to common shareholders | |
$ | (6,372,715 | ) | |
$ | (2,932,828 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss per share of common stock-basic and diluted | |
$ | (0.94 | ) | |
$ | (0.51 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding - basic and diluted | |
| 6,799,624 | | |
| 5,770,944 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Other Comprehensive Loss: | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | (6,372,715 | ) | |
$ | (2,932,828 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total Comprehensive Loss | |
$ | (6,372,715 | ) | |
$ | (2,932,828 | ) |
NUTRIBAND INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Common Stock | | |
Additional | | |
Accumulated
Other | | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Number of | | |
| | |
Paid In | | |
Comprehensive | | |
Accumulated | | |
Subscription | | |
Treasury | |
Year Ended January 31, 2022 | |
Total | | |
shares | | |
Amount | | |
Capital | | |
Income(Loss) | | |
Deficit | | |
Payable | | |
Stock | |
Balance, February 1, 2021 | |
$ | 7,111,946 | | |
| 6,256,772 | | |
$ | 6,257 | | |
$ | 18,871,098 | | |
$ | (304 | ) | |
$ | (11,835,105 | ) | |
$ | 70,000 | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for proceeds
and payment for license | |
| 640,000 | | |
| 81,396 | | |
| 81 | | |
| 699,919 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (60,000 | ) | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from sale of common
stock and warrants in public offering | |
| 5,836,230 | | |
| 1,056,000 | | |
| 1,056 | | |
| 5,835,174 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from exercise of warrants | |
| 2,942,970 | | |
| 392,396 | | |
| 392 | | |
| 2,942,578 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cashless exercise of warrants | |
| - | | |
| 14,869 | | |
| 15 | | |
| (15 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for note
payable | |
| 100,000 | | |
| 17,182 | | |
| 17 | | |
| 99,983 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for services | |
| 466,900 | | |
| 28,102 | | |
| 28 | | |
| 476,872 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (10,000 | ) | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for settlement
of liabilities | |
| 144,000 | | |
| 24,642 | | |
| 25 | | |
| 143,975 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Warrants issued for services | |
| 365,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 365,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Treasury stock repurchased | |
| (104,467 | ) | |
| (28,125 | ) | |
| (28 | ) | |
| 28 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| (104,467 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Employee stock options issued
for services | |
| 532,832 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 532,832 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Warrants issued for round
down settlement | |
| 196,589 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 196,589 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Deemed dividend from warrants | |
| (196,589 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (196,589 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net
loss for the year ended January 31, 2022 | |
| (6,176,126 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (6,176,126 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance, January 31, 2022 | |
$ | 11,859,285 | | |
| 7,843,234 | | |
$ | 7,843 | | |
$ | 29,967,444 | | |
$ | (304 | ) | |
$ | (18,011,231 | ) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (104,467 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | |
Common Stock | | |
Additional | | |
Accumulated
Other | | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Number of | | |
| | |
Paid In | | |
Comprehensive | | |
Accumulated | | |
Subscription | | |
Treasury | |
Year Ended January 31, 2021 | |
Total | | |
shares | | |
Amount | | |
Capital | | |
Income(Loss) | | |
Deficit | | |
Payable | | |
Stock | |
Balance, February 1, 2020 | |
$ | 175,433 | | |
| 5,441,100 | | |
$ | 5,441 | | |
$ | 9,072,573 | | |
$ | (304 | ) | |
$ | (8,902,277 | ) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from sale of common
stock and warrants | |
| 515,108 | | |
| 46,828 | | |
| 47 | | |
| 515,061 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Issuance of common stock
for acquisition | |
| 6,085,180 | | |
| 608,519 | | |
| 609 | | |
| 6,084,571 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Issuance of common stock
for services | |
| 2,004,875 | | |
| 135,325 | | |
| 135 | | |
| 2,004,740 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Issuance of common stock
for note payable | |
| 287,500 | | |
| 25,000 | | |
| 25 | | |
| 287,475 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Subscription payable for
cash | |
| 60,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 60,000 | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Subscription payable for
services | |
| 10,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 10,000 | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Reclassification of warrants
from liability to equity | |
| 906,678 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 906,678 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net
loss for the year ended January 31, 2021 | |
| (2,932,828 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (2,932,828 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance, January 31, 2021 | |
$ | 7,111,946 | | |
| 6,256,772 | | |
$ | 6,257 | | |
$ | 18,871,098 | | |
$ | (304 | ) | |
$ | (11,835,105 | ) | |
$ | 70,000 | | |
$ | - | |
NUTRIBAND INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
|
| |
Years Ended | |
| |
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | |
| | |
| |
Net loss | |
$ | (6,176,126 | ) | |
$ | (2,932,828 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Expenses paid on behalf of the Company by related party | |
| - | | |
| 12,627 | |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| 308,741 | | |
| 160,108 | |
Amortization of debt discount | |
| 97,477 | | |
| 272,130 | |
Gain on change in fair value of derivative | |
| - | | |
| (22,096 | ) |
Early prepayment fee on convertible debentures | |
| - | | |
| 69,131 | |
Amortization of right of use asset | |
| 9,522 | | |
| 9,610 | |
(Gain) loss on extinguisment of debt | |
| (53,028 | ) | |
| 9,162 | |
Common stock issued for services | |
| 466,900 | | |
| 2,004,875 | |
Goodwill impairment | |
| 2,180,836 | | |
| - | |
Stock-based compensation-options | |
| 532,832 | | |
| - | |
Stock-based compensation-warrants | |
| 365,000 | | |
| - | |
Subscription payable | |
| - | | |
| 10,000 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts receivable | |
| 42,967 | | |
| (94,753 | ) |
Prepaid expenses | |
| (370,472 | ) | |
| 20,167 | |
Inventories | |
| (78,800 | ) | |
| (10,235 | ) |
Deferred revenue | |
| 19,421 | | |
| 59,995 | |
Operating lease liability | |
| (9,234 | ) | |
| (10,050 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
| (145,259 | ) | |
| 145,102 | |
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities | |
| (2,809,223 | ) | |
| (297,055 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash received from acquisition | |
| - | | |
| 66,994 | |
Purchase of equipment | |
| (81,595 | ) | |
| - | |
Net Cash Provided by (used in) Investing Activities | |
| (81,595 | ) | |
| 66,994 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from sale of common stock | |
| 583,000 | | |
| 515,108 | |
Proceeds from sale of common stock in public offering | |
| 5,836,230 | | |
| - | |
Proceeds from exercise of warrants | |
| 2,942,970 | | |
| - | |
Proceeds from stock subscription | |
| - | | |
| 60,000 | |
Proceeds from notes payable | |
| - | | |
| 194,870 | |
Payment on convertible debt | |
| - | | |
| (339,131 | ) |
Payment on note payable | |
| (5,496 | ) | |
| (8,935 | ) |
Payment on related party note payable | |
| (1,500,000 | ) | |
| - | |
Payment on finance leases | |
| (121,544 | ) | |
| (8,345 | ) |
Purchase of treasury stock | |
| (104,467 | ) | |
| - | |
Proceeds from related parties | |
| - | | |
| 5,500 | |
Payment of related party payables | |
| - | | |
| (47,194 | ) |
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | |
| 7,630,693 | | |
| 371,873 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Effect of exchange rate on cash | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net change in cash | |
| 4,739,875 | | |
| 141,812 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents - Beginning of period | |
| 151,993 | | |
| 10,181 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents - End of period | |
$ | 4,891,868 | | |
$ | 151,993 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplementary information: | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash paid for: | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest | |
$ | 18,598 | | |
$ | 11,555 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Income taxes | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for settlement of notes payable | |
$ | 100,000 | | |
$ | 287,500 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for prepaid consulting | |
$ | 400,000 | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Non-cash payment for license agreement | |
$ | 57,000 | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Derivative liability warrant reclassed to equity | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 906,678 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for subscription payable | |
$ | 70,000 | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock and note issued in acquisition | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 7,418,073 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for settlement of liabilities | |
$ | 144,000 | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Deemed dividend in connection with warrant round down | |
$ | 196,589 | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cashless exercise of warrant | |
$ | 15 | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Adoption of ASC 842 Operating lease asset and liability | |
$ | 28,565 | | |
$ | - | |
NUTRIBAND
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
as
of and for the Years Ended January 31, 2022 and 2021
1. |
ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS |
Organization
Nutriband
Inc. (the “Company”) is a Nevada corporation, incorporated on January 4, 2016. In January 2016, the Company acquired Nutriband
Ltd, an Irish company which was formed by the Company’s chief executive officer in 2012 to enter the health and wellness market
by marketing transdermal patches. References to the Company relate to the Company and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise.
On
August 1, 2018, the Company acquired 4P Therapeutics LLC (“4P Therapeutics”) for $2,250,000, consisting of 250,000 shares
of common stock, valued at $1,850,000, and $400,000, and a royalty of 6% on all revenue generated by the Company from the abuse deterrent
intellectual property that had been developed by 4P Therapeutics payable to the former owner of 4P Therapeutics. The former owner of
4P Therapeutics has been a director of the Company since April 2018, when the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 4P Therapeutics.
The former owner resigned as a director in January 2022.
4P
Therapeutics is engaged in the development of a series of transdermal pharmaceutical products, that are in the preclinical stage of development.
Prior to the acquisition of 4P Therapeutics, the Company’s business was the development and marketing of a range of transdermal
consumer patches. Most of these products are considered drugs in the United States and cannot be marketed in the United States without
approval by the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”). The Company entered a feasibility agreement as an initial step
to seek FDA approval of its consumer transdermal products and its consumer products which are not being marketed in the United States.
With
the acquisition of 4P Therapeutics, 4P Therapeutics’ drug development business became the Company’s principal business. The
Company’s approach is to use generic drugs that are off patent and incorporate them into the Company’s transdermal drug delivery
system. Although these medications have received FDA approval in oral or injectable form, the Company needs to conduct a transdermal
product development program which will include the preclinical and clinical trials that are necessary to receive FDA approval before
we can market any of our pharmaceutical products.
On
August 25, 2020, the Company formed Pocono Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Pocono Pharmaceuticals”), a wholly owned subsidiary of
the Company. On August 31, 2020, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities associated with the Transdermal, Topical, Cosmetic,
and Nutraceutical business of Pocono Coated Products LLC (“PCP”). The net assets were contributed to Pocono Pharmaceuticals.
Included in the transaction the Company also acquired 100% of the membership interests of Active Intelligence LLC (“Active Intelligence”).
See Note 3 for further details of the acquisition.
Pocono
Pharmaceuticals is a coated products manufacturing entity organized to take advantage of unique process capabilities and experience.
Pocono helps their customer with product design and development along with manufacturing to bring new products to market with minimal
capital investment. Pocono Pharmaceutical’s competitive edge is a low-cost manufacturing base: a result of its unique processes
and state of the art material technology. Active Intelligence manufactures activated kinesiology tape. The tape has transdermal and topical
properties. This tape is used as the same as traditional kinesiology tape.
In
December 2019, COVID-19 emerged and has subsequently spread world-wide. The World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a pandemic
resulting in federal, state and local governments and private entities mediating various restrictions, including travel restrictions,
restrictions on public gatherings, stay at home orders and advisories and quarantining people who may have been exposed to the virus.
The effect of these orders, government imposed quarantines and measures the Company would take, such as work-at-home policies, may negatively
impact productivity, disrupt our business and could delay our clinical programs and timelines, the magnitude of which will depend, in
part, on the length and severity of the restrictions and disruptions in our operations could negatively impact our business, operating
results and financial condition. Fur ther, quarantines, shelter-in-place and similar government orders, or the perception that such orders,
shutdowns, or other restrictions on the conduct of business could occur, related to COVID-19 or other infectious diseases could impact
personnel at third-party manufacturing facilities in the United States and other countries, or the availability or cost of materials,
which could disr upt our supply chain.
2. | SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Going
Concern
As
of January 31, 2022, the Company believes the substantial doubt about its status as a going concern has been resolved. The going concern
conditions that caused substantial doubt no longer exist as the Company has positive cash flow during the last year and as of January
31, 2022, has positive working capital. In October 2021, the Company consummated a public offering and received net proceeds of $5,836,230.
The Company also received $2,942,970 of proceeds from the exercise of warrants. Management retired most of its debt and other current
obligations. Management has implemented other plans to alleviate the substantial doubt. These plans include a substantial increase in
projected sales commitments. These factors did not exist in prior years during its start-up operations. The Company’s recent history
of losses has continued but future positive cash flow projections due to its management’s plans which includes its acquisition
in the latter part of 2020 will enable the Company to alleviate the substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as
a going concern. Management’s plans have been currently implemented. The plans enable the Company to meet its obligations for at
least one year from the date when the financial statements are issued.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements of the Company include the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated. The operations of 4P Therapeutics are included in the Company’s financial statements from
the date of acquisition of August 1, 2018 , and the operations of Pocono and Active Intelligence are included in the Company’s
financial statements from the date of acquisition of September 1, 2020. The wholly owned subsidiaries are as follows:
Nutriband
Ltd.
4P
Therapeutics LLC
Pocono
Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates including,
but not limited to, those related to such items as income tax exposures, accruals, depreciable/useful lives, allowance for doubtful accounts
and valuation allowances. The Company bases i ts estimates on historical experience and on other various assumptions that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets
and liabilities that are not read ily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which
amends the accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at
an amount an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to a customer. The Company adopted the guidance under the new
revenue standards using the modified retrospective method effective February 1, 2018 and determined no cumulative effect adjusted to
retained earnings was necessary upon adoption. Topic 606 requires the Company to recognize revenues when control of the promised goods
or services and receipt of payment is probable. The Company recognizes revenue based on the five criteria for revenue recognition established
under Topic 606: 1) identify the contract, 2) identify separate performance obligations, 3) determine the transaction price, 4) allocate
the transaction price among the performance obligations, and 5) recognize revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied.
Revenue
Types
The
following is a description of the Company’s revenue types, which include professional services and sale of goods:
| ● | Service
revenues include the contract of research and development related services with the Company’s
clients in the life sciences field on an as-needed basis. Deliverables primarily consist
of detailed findings and conclusion reports provided to the client for each given research
project engaged. |
| ● | Product
revenues are derived from the sale of the Company’s consumer transdermal and coated
products. Upon the reception of a purchase order, we have the order filled and shipped. |
Contracts
with Customers
A contract with a customer exists when
(i) we enter into an enforceable contract with a customer that defines each party’s rights regarding the goods or services to be
transferred and identifies the payment terms related to these goods or services, (ii) the contract has commercial substance and, (iii)
we determine that collection of substantially all consideration for services that t are transferred is probable based on the customer’s
intent and ability to pay the promised consideration.
Contract
Liabilities
Deferred
revenue is a liability related to a revenue producing activity for which revenue has not been recognized. The Company records deferred
revenue when it receives consideration from a contract before achieving certain criteria that must be met for revenue to be recognized
in conformity with GAAP.
Performance
Obligations
A
performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer and is the unit of account in
the new revenue standard. The contract transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue
when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. For the Company’s different revenue service types, the performance obligation
is satisfied at different times. The Company’s performance obligations include providing products and professional services in
the area of research. The Company recognizes product revenue performance obligations in most cases when the product has shipped to the
customer. When we perform professional service work, we recognize revenue when we have the right to invoice the customer for the work
completed, which typically occurs over time on a monthly basis for the work performed during that month.
All
revenue recognized in the income statement is considered to be revenue from contracts with customers.
Disaggregation
of Revenues
The
Company disaggregates its revenue from contracts with customers by type and by geographical location. See the tables:
| |
Years Ended
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Revenue by type | |
| | |
| |
Sale of goods | |
$ | 1,179,620 | | |
$ | 737,519 | |
Services | |
| 242,534 | | |
| 206,183 | |
Total | |
$ | 1,422,154 | | |
$ | 943,702 | |
| |
Years Ended
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Revenue by geographic location: | |
| | |
| |
United States | |
$ | 1,335,554 | | |
$ | 360,378 | |
Foreign | |
| 86,600 | | |
| 583,324 | |
| |
$ | 1,422,154 | | |
$ | 943,702 | |
Accounts
receivable
Trade
accounts receivables are recorded at the net invoice value and are not interest bearing. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful
accounts for estimated losses from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The Company determines its allowances by
both specific identification of customer accounts where appropriate and the application of historical loss to non-applicable accounts.
For the years ended January 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company recorded no bad debt expense for doubtful accounts related to account receivable.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower
of cost and reasonable value determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Net realized value is the estimated selling price
in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable selling expenses. The cost of finished goods and work in process is comprised
of material costs, direct labor costs and other direct costs and related production overheads (based on normal operating capacity). As
of January 31, 2022 and 2021, 100% of the inventory consists of raw materials.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property
and equipment represent an important component of the Company’s assets. The Company depreciates its plant and equipment on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost. Expenditures for minor
repairs, maintenance and replacement parts which do not increase the useful lives of the assets are charged to expense as incurred. All
major additions and improvements are capitalized. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. The lives over which the fixed
assets are depreciated range from 3 to 20 years as follows:
Lab Equipment |
|
5-10 years |
Furniture and fixtures |
|
3 years |
Machinery and equipment |
|
10-20 years |
Intangible
Assets
Intangible
assets include trademarks, intellectual property and customer base acquired through business combinations. The Company accounts for Other
Intangible Assets under the guidance of ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other.” The Company capitalizes certain costs
related to patent technology. A substantial component of the purchase price related to the Company’s acquisitions have also been
assigned to intellectual property and other intangibles. Under the guidance, other intangible assets with definite lives are amortized
over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested annually for impairment. Trademarks, intellectual
property and customer base are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of ten years.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the difference
between the total purchase price and the fair value of assets (tangible and intangible) and liabilities at the date of acquisition. Goodwill
is reviewed for impairment annually on January 31, and more frequently as circumstances warrant, and written down only in the period
in which the recorded value of such assets exceeds their fair value. The Company does not amortize goodwill in accordance with ASC 350.
In connection with the Company’s acquisition of 4P Therapeutics LLC in 2018, the Company recorded Goodwill of $1,719,235. On August
31, 2020, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the PCP Assets and Active Intelligence, the Company recorded Goodwill
of $5,810,640. During the year ended January 31, 2022, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $2,180,836 reducing the PCP Assets
and Active Intelligence goodwill to $3,629,813. The write down of goodwill is attributable primarily to the effect of the pandemic. COVID-19,
unmet sales expectations, and other factors the Company determined resulted in the impairment. The valuation of the reporting unit does
not exceed the carrying amount using the value in use or the going concern premise. As of January 31, 2022 and 2021, goodwill amounted
to $5,349,039 and $7,529,875, respectively.
Long-lived
Assets
Management
reviews long-lived assets for potential impairment whenever significant events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment exists when the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable and
exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the estimated undiscounted
cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If an impairment exists, the resulting write-down would
be the difference between the fair market value of the long-lived asset and the related book value.
Earnings
per Share
Basic
earnings per share of common stock is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common
stock and potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Potential shares of common stock consist of shares issuable
upon the exercise of outstanding options and common stock purchase warrants. As of January 31, 2022, and 2021, there were 1,288,432 and
141,830 common stock equivalents outstanding, that were not included in the calculation of dilutive earnings per share as their effect
would be anti-dilutive.
Stock-Based
Compensation
ASC
718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation,” prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all share-based payment transactions
in which employee services, and, since February 1, 2019, non-employees, are acquired. Transactions include incurring liabilities,
or issuing or offering to issue shares, options and other equity instruments such as employee stock ownership plans and stock appreciation
rights. Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the
financial statements based on their fair values. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide
services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). As of February 1, 2019, pursuant
to ASC 2018-07, ASC 718 was applied to stock-based compensation for both employees and non-employees.
Business
Combinations
The
Company recognizes the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity at the acquisition
date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the accounting literature. In accordance with
this guidance, acquisition-related costs, including restructuring costs, must be recognized separately from the acquisition and will
generally be expensed as incurred. That replaces the cost-allocation process detailed in previous accounting literature, which required
the cost of an acquisition to be allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabil ities assumed based on their estimated fair value.
Leases
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases” (Topic 842), to provide a new comprehensive model for lease accounting
under this guidance, lessees and lessors should apply a “right-of-use” model in accounting for all leases (including subleases)
and eliminate the concept of operating leases and off-balance-sheet leases. Recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses will
depend on classification as a finance or operating lease. Similar modifications have been made to lessor accounting in-line with revenue
recognition guidance.
The
Company adopted ASU 2016-02 as amended effective February 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach. In connection with the adoption,
the Company elected to utilize the Comparative Under 840 Option whereby the Company will continue to present prior period financial statements
and disclosures under ASC 840. In addition, the Company elected the transition package of three practical expedients permitted under
the standard, which eliminates the requirements to reassess prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial
direct costs. The Company completed the necessary changes to its accounting policies, processes, disclosure and internal control over
financial reporting.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Income
Taxes
Taxes
are calculated in accordance with taxation principles currently effective in the United States and Ireland.
The Company accounts for income taxes
under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax
consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates
in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and
liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The
Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent they believe these assets will more-likely-than-not be realized. In making such
determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary
differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In the event the Company was to
determine that it would be able to realize its deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount, the Company
would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash. The Company’s cash
and cash equivalents are concentrated primarily in banks. At times, such deposits could be in excess of insured limits. Management believes
that the financial institutions that hold the Company’s financial instruments are financially sound and, accordingly, minimal credit
risk is believed to exist with respect to these financial instruments. As of and for the year ended January 31, 2022, three customers
accounted for 19%, 17% and 13% of the Company’s revenues and three customers accounted for 58%, 21% and 17% of accounts receivable.
As of and for the year ended January 31, 2021, one customer accounted for 62% of the Company’s revenues and two customers accounted
for 67% and 13% of accounts receivable.
Fair
Value Measurements
FASB
ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure” (“ASC 820”), defines fair value as the exchange price that
would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset
or liability in an orderly transaction between participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy
which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value.
The Company utilizes the accounting
guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures for all financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and liabilities
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis during the reporting period.
The fair value is an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants based upon the best use of the asset or liability at the measurement date. The Company
utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. ASC 820 establishes a three-tier
value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers are defined as follows:
Level
1 -Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets.
Level
2 -Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable.
Level
3 -Unobservable inputs about which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The
carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses,
and accrued expenses approximate their fair value due to the short maturities of these financial instruments.
Reclassification
The Company has reclassified prior
year amounts to show the allocation of depreciation expense to cost of goods sold.
Recent
Accounting Standards
In
December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which modifies ASC
740 to reduce complexity or improving the usefulness of the information provided to the users of financial statements. ASU 2019-12 is
effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2021. The Company adopted ASU 2019-12 on February 1, 2021. The adoption
of ASU 2019-12 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU
2020-06, Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity, which simplifies the guidance in U.S.
GAAP on the issuer’s accounting for convertible debt instruments. ASU 2020-06 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning
after January 1, 2021. The Company adopted ASU 2020-06 on February 1, 2021. The adoption of ASU 2020-06 did not have a material impact
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities
from Contracts with Customers, which clarifies how to properly account for deferred revenue in a business combination. ASU 2021-08 is
effective for periods after December 15, 2022. The Company does not believe the adoption of ASU 2021-08 will have a material effect on
the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The
Company has reviewed all other FASB-issued ASU accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effective dates during
the period reported and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous GAAP and does
not believe that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the Company’s reported financial position or operations
in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of the Company’s financial management and certain
standards are under consideration.
3. | ACQUISITION
OF BUSINESS |
On
August 31, 2020, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”), with Pocono Coated Products (“PCP”),
pursuant to which PCP agreed to sell the Company certain of the assets and liabilities associated with its Transdermal, Topical, Cosmetic,
and Nutraceutical business, including: (1) all the equipment, intellectual property and trade secrets, cash balances, receivables, bank
accounts and inventory, free and clear of all liens, except for certain lease obligations, and (2), a 100% membership interest in Active
Intelligence, LLC (collectively the “Assets”). The net assets acquired were contributed to Pocono Pharmaceuticals Inc, a
newly formed wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The purchase price for the Assets was (i) $6,085,180 paid with the issuance of 608,519
shares in the Company’s common stock of Nutriband at a value of the average price of the previous 90 days at the date of Closing
(the “Shares”), and (ii) a promissory note of the Company, net of debt discount, in the principal amount, of $1,332,893 (the
Note”) which is due upon the earlier of (a) twelve (12) months from issuance, or (b) immediately following a capital raise of not
less than $4,000,000 and/or a public offering of no less than $4,000,000. Michael Myer, the CEO of PCP, has been elected to the Board
of Directors of the Company for period of one year at the annual meeting of shareholders of the Company held in October 2020.
The
Agreement provides that it is effective August 31, 2020, on which date the parties also entered into an escrow agreement (the “Escrow
Agreement”), with legal counsel serving as the escrow agent, providing for holding of the Note, certificate for the shares, and
title to the Assets (held in a special purpose subsidiary) as collateral security for completion of all closing conditions under the
Agreement. On that date, the parties also entered into a security agreement granting PCP a security interest in all proceeds of the Assets
held as collateral under the Escrow Agreement.
The purpose of the Company entering
into the transaction is to enhance the transdermal products operations of the Company. The fair value of consideration given was allocated
to the net tangible assets acquired. Under U.S. GAAP, both the PCP segment and Active Intelligence were considered to be businesses and,
as such, the transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting.
Details
of the net assets acquired are as follows:
| |
Fair value | |
| |
Recognized on | |
| |
Acquisition | |
Common stock issued | |
$ | 6,085,180 | |
Note payable issued | |
| 1,332,893 | |
| |
$ | 7,418,073 | |
| |
| | |
Cash | |
$ | 66,994 | |
Accounts receivable | |
| 1,761 | |
Inventory | |
| 42,613 | |
Equipment and fixtures | |
| 1,056,935 | |
Customer base | |
| 177,600 | |
Intellectual property and trademarks | |
| 583,200 | |
Goodwill | |
| 5,810,640 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
| (26,104 | ) |
Deferred revenue | |
| (26,851 | ) |
Debt | |
| (268,715 | ) |
Net assets acquired | |
$ | 7,418,073 | |
The
following unaudited pro forma condensed financial information presents the combined results of operations of the Company and the two
businesses acquired from PCP, Pocono and Active Intelligence, as if the acquisition occurred as part of the beginning of cash period
presented. The unaudited pro forma condensed financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the consolidated
results of operations of the Company that would have been reported had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the period presented
and should not be taken as being representation of the future consolidated results of operations of the Company.
| |
Year Ended
January 31, | |
| |
2021 | |
| |
As Reported | | |
Proforma | |
Net revenue | |
$ | 943,702 | | |
$ | 1,369,761 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
| (2,932,828 | ) | |
| (3,001,178 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Loss per common share - basic and diluted | |
| (0.51 | ) | |
| (0.52 | ) |
| |
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Lab equipment | |
$ | 144,585 | | |
$ | 144,585 | |
Machinery and equipment | |
| 1,138,530 | | |
| 1,056,935 | |
Furniture and fixtures | |
| 19,643 | | |
| 19,643 | |
| |
| 1,302,758 | | |
| 1,221,163 | |
Less: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accumulated depreciation | |
| (323,461 | ) | |
| (144,537 | ) |
Net Property and Equipment | |
$ | 979,297 | | |
$ | 1,076,626 | |
Depreciation expense amounted to $178,924
and $91,338 for the years ended January 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. During the years ended January 31, 2022 and 2021, depreciation
expense of $113,000 and $45,000, respectively, have been allocated to cost of goods sold.
The Company adopted the provisions
of ASC 740, “Income Taxes, (“ASC 740”). As a result of the implementation of ASC 740, the Company recognized no adjustment
in the net liability for unrecognized income tax benefits. The Company believes there are no potential uncertain tax positions, and all
tax returns are correct as filed. Should the Company recognize a liability for uncertain tax positions, the Company will separately recognize
the liability for uncertain tax positions on its balance sheet. Included in any liability or uncertain tax positions, the Company will
also setup a liability for interest and penalties. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain
tax positions as a component of the current provision for income taxes.
There is no U.S. tax provision due
to losses from U.S. operations for the years ended January 31, 202 2 and 2021. Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences
between the financial reporting and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. The principal item giving rise to deferred
taxes is the net operating loss carryforward in the U.S. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets
to the amount expected to be realized. The Company has set up a valuation allowance for losses for certain carryforwards that it believes
may not be realized.
The
provision for income taxes consists of the following:
| |
| Years
Ended
January 31, | |
| |
| 2022 | | |
| 2021 | |
Current | |
| | | |
| | |
Federal | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
Foreign | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Deferred | |
| | | |
| | |
Federal | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Foreign | |
| - | | |
| - | |
A
reconciliation of taxes on income computed at the federal statutory rate to amounts provided is as follows:
| |
Years Ended
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Book income (loss from operations) | |
$ | (1,296,987 | ) | |
$ | (615,894 | ) |
Common stock issued for services | |
| 286,594 | | |
| 421,024 | |
Impairment expense | |
| 457,976 | | |
| - | |
Unused operating losses | |
| 552,417 | | |
| 194,870 | |
Income tax expense | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
As
of January 31, 2022, the Company recorded a deferred tax asset associated with a net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward
of approximately $7,700,000 that was fully offset by a valuation allowance due to the determination that it was more likely than not
that the Company would be unable to utilize those benefits in the foreseeable future. The Company’s NOL expires in 2039. The tax
effect of the valuation allowance increased by approximately $1,250,000 during the year ended January 31, 2022. On December 22, 2017,
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) significantly revised U.S. corporate income tax law by, among other things, reducing
the corporate rate from 34% to 21%. Because the Company recognizes a valuation allowance for the entire balance, there is no net impact
to the Company’s balance sheet or results of operations.
The
types of temporary differences between tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial
reporting amounts that give rise to the deferred tax liability and deferred tax asset and
their approximate tax effects are as follows:
6. | NOTES
PAYABLE/CONVERTIBLE DEBT |
Notes
Payable
On March 21, 2020, the Coronavirus
Aid Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES ACT” was enacted. The CARES ACT established the Paycheck Protection Program
(“PPP”) which funds small businesses through federally guaranteed loans. Under the PPP, companies are eligible for forgiveness
of principal and interest if the proceeds are used for eligible payroll costs, rent and utility costs. On June 17, 2020, the Company’s
subsidiary, 4P Therapeutics, was advanced $34,870 under the PPP, all of which was forgiven as of April 30, 2021. The Company recorded
a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $34,870 during the year ended January 31, 2022.
In
July 2020, a minority shareholder made an additional loan to the Company in the amount of $100,000. The loan is interest-free and due
upon demand. In October 2021, the loan was converted into 17,182 common shares of the Company. The shares were issued at fair market
value and no gain or loss was recorded for the transaction.
Active
Intelligence, the Company’s newly acquired subsidiary, entered into an agreement with the Carolina Small Business Development Fund
for a line of credit of $160,000 due October 16, 2029, with interest of 5% per year. The amount assumed in Note 3 was $139,184. The loan
requires monthly payments of principal and interest of $1,697. During the year ended January 31, 2022, principal and interest payments
of $8,344 were forgiven under the Cares Act. The amount, $8,344, has been recorded as a gain on the forgiveness of debt. As of January
31, 2022, the amount due was $115,238, of which $14,119 is current.
Finance
Leases
Pocono
has two finance leases secured by equipment. The leases mature in 2025 and 2026. The incremental borrowing rate is 5.0%. The amount due
on the leases was $121,544, all of which was paid during the year ended January 2022.
Related
Party Payable
On August 31, 2020, in connection
with the Company’s acquisition of Pocono Products LLC, the Company issued to Pocono Coated Products LLC a promissory note, net
of debt discount, in the amount of $1,332,893 with interest accruing at an annual rate of 0.17%, due on August 28, 2021, or immediately
following the earlier of a capital raise of no less than $4,000,000 and/or a public offering of no less than $4,000,000. Pocono Coated
Products LLC, a related party, is a shareholder of the Company. During the nine months ended October 31, 2021, the Company recorded amortization
of debt discount of $97,477. In October 2021, the note in the amount of $1,500,000 was paid in full.
Convertible
Debt
On
October 30, 2019, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with two investors pursuant to which the Company issued to
the investors (i) 6% one-year convertible promissory notes in the principal amount of $270,000 and (ii) three-year warrant to purchase
50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of (i) $20.90 or (ii) if the Company completes a public offering,
110% of the initial public offering price of the common stock in the public offering. The loans contained an original issue discount
of $20,000 resulting in gross proceeds from this financing of $250,000.
The notes are convertible at a conversion
price equal to the lesser of (i) the per share price of our common stock offered in a public offering or (ii) the variable conversion
price, which is defined as 70% of the lowest trading price of the common stock during the 20 trading days preceding the date of conversion.
The conversion price and the percentage of the trading price is subject to downward adjustment in the event the Company fails to comply
with the obligations under the notes. The Company has the right to prepay the notes during the 180 days following the issuance of the
notes at a premium of 115% of the outstanding principal and interest during the 60 days following the date of issuance of the note, which
percentage increases to 125% during the remainder of the 180-day period. The Company is required to pay the notes one business day after
the closing of the first to occur of (a) the next public offering of the Company’s securities or (b) the next private placement
of the Company’s equity or debt securities in which the Borrower received net proceeds of at least $1.0 million, (c) issuance of
securities pursuant to an equity line of credit or (d) a financing with a bank or other institutional lender.
The
embedded conversion option qualified for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815 -15 Derivative and Hedging. The initial
fair of the conversion feature was $128,870 and the fair value of the warrants in connection with the notes were valued at $888,789 and
were recorded based on their relative fair values. A debt discount to the note payables of $270,000 and an initial derivative expense
of $767,650 was recorded.
The
debt discount will be amortized over the life of the note. Amortization of the debt discount for the year ended January 31, 2020, was
$202,500.
On
March 25, 2020, the Company prepaid the convertible notes in the principal amount of $270,000 from the proceeds of a private placement.
The total payments, including a prepayment fee of $69,131 and accrued interest, was $345,565. As a result of the payment of the notes,
the derivative liability, which was $928,774 as of January 31, 2020, was reduced to zero. The warrants are no longer a derivative liability
based on the notes being paid in full.
Interest
expense for the year ended January 31, 2022, was $118,421 including the amortization of the debt discount of $97,477 and interest expense
of $20,944. Interest expense for the year ended January 31, 2021, was $280,686 including the amortization of debt discount of $272,130
and interest expense of $8,566.
As
of January 31, 2022 and 2021, intangible assets consisted of intellectual property, customer base, license agreement and trademarks,
net of amortization, as follows:
| |
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Customer base | |
$ | 314,100 | | |
$ | 314,100 | |
License agreement | |
| 50,000 | | |
| - | |
Intellectual property | |
| 817,400 | | |
| 817,400 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total | |
| 1,181,500 | | |
| 1,131,500 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Less: Accumulated amortization | |
| (254,587 | ) | |
| (124,770 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net Intangible Assets | |
$ | 926,913 | | |
$ | 1,006,730 | |
In
February 2021, the Company acquired an IP license for $50,000, see Note 10 - “Rambam Agreement” for further discussion regarding
the license agreement. The value of the intangible assets, consisting of intellectual property, license agreement and customer base has
been recorded at their fair value by the Company and are being amortized over a period of three to ten years. Amortization expense for
the years ended January 31, 2022, and 2021 was $129,817 and $68,770, respectively.
Year Ended January 31, | | |
| |
2023 | | |
$ | 129,776 | |
2024 | | |
| 129,776 | |
2025 | | |
| 113,109 | |
2026 | | |
| 113,109 | |
2027 | | |
| 113,109 | |
2028
and thereafter | | |
| 328,034 | |
| | |
$ | 926,913 | |
8. | RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
| a) | In
connection with the acquisition of Pocono, the Company recorded various transactions and
operations through Pocono Coated Products LLC, a related entity. During the year ended January
31, 2022, the Company was advanced $7,862 in finance payments. As of January 31, 2022, the
balance due Pocono was paid in full. The Company also issued a note in the amount of $1,500,000
to Pocono Coated Products LLC. In October 2021, the related party note payable was repaid.
See Note 5 for further discussion. |
| b) | For
services to the Company resulting in a listing on a National Exchange and material capital
raise of no less than $4 million, the Company will pay the Company’s President and
Chief Executive Officer a Milestone bonus of up to $50,000 each. Should any transaction include
a warrant clause, the President and Chief Executive Officer shall receive a further $50,000
bonus for every $2 million exercised. For the year ended January 31, 2022, the President
and Chief Executive Officer each received $100,000. |
| c) | On
October 5, 2021, the Company issued 75,000 warrants for services to the Company’s CFO
in connection with the Company’s IPO. The warrants are exercisable at $4.90 per share
and expire in three years. The fair value of the warrants issued was $219,000. |
| d) | On
October 25, 2021, the Company issued 24,642 shares, valued at $144,000, for services to executive
officers in connection with research and development expenses. The shares were issued in
settlement of liabilities. |
| e) | On
January 21, 2022, 163,500 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock
were issued to executives and directors of the Company at prices of $4.85 and $5.34 per share.
The options vest immediately and expire in three years. The fair value of the options issued
for services amounted to $472,476 and was expensed during the year ended January 31, 2022. |
| f) | During
the year ended January 31, 2021, the Company issued 51,825 shares of common stock, valued
at $777,375, to executive officers of the Company, based on the market price at the date
of issuance, and 78,500 shares of common stock, valued at $1,221,500, to the Company’s
current and former independent directors, based on the market price at the date of issuance.
The shares were issued on December 31, 2020, at a price of $15 per share. |
Preferred
Stock
On
January 15, 2016, the board of directors of the Company approved a certificate of amendment to the articles of incorporation and changed
the authorized capital stock of the Company to include and authorize 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share.
On
May 24, 2019, the board of directors created a series of preferred stock consisting of 2,500,000 shares designated as the Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”). On June 20, 2019, the Series A preferred Stock was terminated, and the 2,500,000
shares were restored to the status of authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock, without designation as to series, until such
stock is once more designated as part of a particular series by the board of directors.
Common
Stock
On
June 25, 2019, the Company effected a one-for-four reverse stock splits, pursuant to which each share of common stock became converted
into 0.25 shares of common stock, and the Company decreased its authorized common stock from 100,000,000 to 25,000,000 shares.
On
January 27, 2020, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to increase its authorized common shares from 25,000,000 shares to
250,000,000 shares.
Activity
during the Year Ended January 31, 2022
| (a) | On
February 25, 2021, in connection with the Company’s License Agreement with Rambam,
pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement with BPM Inno Ltd (“BPM”), the Company
issued 81,396 shares of common stock to BPM and received proceeds of $700,000 to be applied
to product development expenses under the License Agreement. The Company entered into the
Stock Purchase Agreement with BPM in December 2020 and received a payment of $60,000 which
is included in Stockholders’ Equity as Subscription Payable in the Company’s
consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2021. In February 2021, BPM advanced a payment
for the Company to Rambam in the amount of $57,000 for the license fee. The balance of the
funds of $583,000 was received in February 2021. On February 15, 2021, the Company issued
12,500 shares of common stock, valued at $350,000, for consulting fees in connection with
the Rambam License Agreement discussed in Note 10. |
| (b) | On
February 25, 2021, the Company issued 5,602 shares of common stock, valued at $60,000, for
consulting services pursuant to a consultant agreement commencing December 1, 2020. The Company
has reflected $10,000 representing 934 shares as Subscription Payable in the Stockholders’
Equity in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2021. |
| (c) | On
October 5, 2021, the Company consummated a public offering (the “IPO”) of 1,056,000
units (the “Units”), each Unit consisting of one share of common stock and one
warrant (each a “Warrant”) at a price of $6.25 per Unit, and an additional 158,400
warrants pursuant to exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. At closing,
the Company received net proceeds of $5,836,230 from the sale of our securities in the IPO,
which include direct offering costs of $790,000. Concurrently, with the October 1, 2021 effective
date of the IPO, the shares of our common stock and the Warrants sold to the public in the
IPO were listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Each Warrant is immediately exercisable,
will entitle the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $7.50
and will expire five years from the date of issuance. The shares of common stock and Warrants
are separately transferred immediately upon issuance. |
| (d) | During
the year ended January 31, 2022, the Company issued 392,396 shares of its common stock and
received proceeds of $2,942,970 from the exercise of 392,396 public warrants. |
| (e) | On
October 22, 2021, the Company issued 17,182 shares of its common stock in exchange for the
extinguishment of debt in the amount of $100,000. No gain or loss was recognized in the transaction.
See Note 5 for further discussion. |
| (f) | On
October 25,2021, the Company issued 24,642 shares, valued at $144,000, for consulting services
issued in connection with research and development expenses. The shares were issued in settlement
of liabilities. |
| (g) | On
October 5, 2021, in connection with the Company’s IPO, two former debtholders were
issued an additional 72,200 warrants at an exercise price of $6.25 per share in accordance
with the anti-dilution provision of their agreement. The fair value of the warrants issued
amounted to $196,589 and the Company recorded the transaction as a deemed dividend related
to the warrant round down. In October 2021, one of the former debtholders exercised the 36,100
warrants as a cashless warrant and was issued 14,869 shares of common stock. |
| (h) | In
December 2021, the Company purchased 28,125 shares of its common stock for $104,467 and recorded
the purchase as Treasury Stock as of January 31, 2022. |
| (i) | In
January 2022, the Company issued 10,000 shares, valued at $66,900, for services in connection
with investor relations for the Company. |
Activity
during the Year Ended January 31, 2021
On
March 22, 2020, the Company issued in a private placement 46,828 units at a price of $11 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of
common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $14 per share. The warrants expire April 30,
2023. The Company issued a total of 46,828 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 46,828 shares of common stock. The Company
received proceeds of $515,108.
In
March 2020, a minority shareholder who had previously made loans of $215,000, made an additional loan to the Company in the amount of
$60,000, increasing the loans to shareholder to $275,000. On March 27, 2020, the Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock upon reaching
a settlement with the noteholder to convert the notes in the principal amount of $275,000. The transaction resulted in a loss on extinguishment
of $12,500.
On
June 30, 2020, the Company issued 5,000 shares to a consultant for services rendered to the Company. The fair value of the common stock
at the date of issuance was $50,000, all of which is included in selling and general administrative expense for the year ended January
31, 2021.
On
August 31, 2020, the Company acquired the membership interests in Pocono Coated Products LLC and issued 608,519 shares of its common
stock, valued at $6,085,180, and issued a promissory note, net of debt discount, in the amount of $1,332,893. See Note 2 for further
information.
On
December 31, 2020, the Company issued 130,325 shares of common stock for services, valued at $1,954,875, as follows:
| (1) | 51,825
shares of common stock, valued at $777,375, issued to executive officers. |
| (2) | 78,500
shares of common stock, valued at $1,177,500, issued to the Company’s current and former
independent directors. |
Subscription
Payable
| (a) | On
February 25, 2021, in connection with the Company’s License Agreement with Rambam,
pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement with BPM Inno Ltd (“BPM”), the Company
issued 81,396 shares of common stock to BPM and received proceeds of $700,000 to be applied
to product development expenses under the License Agreement. The Company entered into the
Stock Purchase Agreement with BPM in December 2020 and received a payment of $60,000 which
is included in Stockholders’ Equity as Subscription in the Company’s consolidated
balance sheet as of January 31, 2021. The balance of the funds was received in February 2021. |
| (b) | On
February 25, 2021, the Company issued 5,602 shares of common stock, valued at $60,000, for
consulting services pursuant to a consultant agreement commencing December 1, 2020. The Company
has reflected $10,000 representing 934 shares as Subscription Payable in the Stockholders’
Equity in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2021. |
Warrants
The
following table summarizes the changes in warrants outstanding and the related price of the shares of the Company’s common stock
issued to non-employees of the Company. During the year ended January 31, 2022, the Company issued 1,056,000 public warrants in connection
with its public offering, 105,600 to the underwriters in connection with its public offering,158,400 warrants issued to the underwriters
related to the over-allotment, 125,000 (of which 75,000 were issued to the Chief Financial Officer) warrants for services and 72,200
warrants to previous convertible noteholders as additional compensation due to the warrant round down provisions of their agreement.
See Note 5 for further discussion.
| a) | The
public warrants in the amount of 1,056,000 and underwriter warrants in the amount of 158,400
were issued on October 5, 2021. The warrants vest immediately at an exercise price of $7.50
per share and expire five years from the date of issuance. As of January 31, 2022, 822,004
warrants remain outstanding. |
| b) | The
warrants to the underwriters in the amount of 105,600 were issued on October 5, 2021. The
warrants vest on April 1, 2022, at an exercise price of $7.50 per share and expire three
years from the date of issuance. |
| c) | On
October 21, 2021, the Company issued 125,000 warrants for services to the Company’s
CFO and a service provider in connection with the Company’s IPO. The warrants are exercisable
at $4.90 per share and expire in three years. As of January 31, 2022, all the warrants remain
outstanding. |
| d) | On
October 5, 2021, the Company issued 72,200 warrants to previous convertible debtholders.
The warrants vest immediately at an exercise price of $6.25 per share and expire on October
30, 2022. As of January 31, 2022, 36,100 warrants remain outstanding. |
The
warrant exercise price to the previous convertible debt noteholders was adjusted to $6.25 for the round down provisions and the resulting
$196,589 of deemed dividend was recorded during the year ended January 31, 2022. The fair value of the warrants issued for services amounted
to $365,000 and was recorded during the same period. The Company used the Black- Scholes valuation model to record the fair value. The
valuation model used a dividend rate of 0%; expected term of 1.5 years; volatility rate of 136.19%; and risk-free rate of 0.10%.
| |
Shares | | |
Exercise Price | | |
Remaining Life | | |
Intrinsic Value | |
Outstanding, January 31, 2020 | |
| 70,000 | | |
$ | 18.93 | | |
| 2.08
years | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| 91,828 | | |
| 12.53 | | |
| 3.00
years | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Expired/Cancelled | |
| (20,000 | ) | |
| 14.00 | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Outstanding, January 31, 2021 | |
| 141,828 | | |
| 11.99 | | |
| 2.16
years | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| 1,517,200 | | |
| 7.23 | | |
| 4.70
years | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Expired/Cancelled | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercised | |
| (428,496 | ) | |
| 7.39 | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Outstanding- January 31, 2022 | |
| 1,230,532 | | |
$ | 7.35 | | |
| 3.93 years
| | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercisable - January 31, 2022 | |
| 1,124,932 | | |
$ | 7.34 | | |
| 3.86 years
| | |
$ | - | |
The
following table summarizes additional information relating to the warrants outstanding as of January 31, 2022:
| | |
| | |
Weighted | | |
Weighted Average | | |
| | |
Weighted Average | | |
| |
Range of | | |
| | |
Average
Remaining | | |
Exercise
Price for | | |
| | |
Exercise
Price for | | |
| |
Exercise
Prices | | |
Number
Outstanding | | |
Contractual
Life(Years) | | |
Shares Outstanding | | |
Number
Exercisable | | |
Shares Exercisable | | |
Intrinsic
Value | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
$ | 6.25 | | |
| 131,100 | | |
| 0.75 | | |
$ | 6.25 | | |
| 131,100 | | |
$ | 6.25 | | |
$ | - | |
$ | 14.00 | | |
| 46,828 | | |
| 1.24 | | |
$ | 14.00 | | |
| 46,828 | | |
$ | 14.00 | | |
$ | - | |
$ | 7.50 | | |
| 927,604 | | |
| 4.68 | | |
$ | 7.50 | | |
| 822,004 | | |
$ | 7.50 | | |
$ | - | |
$ | 4.90 | | |
| 125,000 | | |
| 2.73 | | |
$ | 4.90 | | |
| 125,000 | | |
$ | 4.90 | | |
$ | - | |
Options
The
following table summarizes the changes in options outstanding and the related price of the shares of the Company’s common stock
issued to employees of the Company.
On
November 1, 2021, The Board of Directors adopted the 2021 Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). The Company has reserved
350,000 shares to issue and sell upon the exercise of stock options. The options vest immediately upon issuance and expire in three years.
Under the Plan, options may be granted which are intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options (“ISOs”) under Section 422
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) or which are not (” non-ISOs”) intended to qualify as Incentive
Stock Options thereunder. The Plan also provides for restricted stock awards representing shares of common stock that are issued subject
to such restrictions on transfer and other incidents of ownership and such forfeiture conditions as the board of Directors, or the committee
administering the Plan composed of directors who qualify as “independent” under Nasdaq rules, may determine. On November
3, 2021, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8, to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended the 350,000
shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan. As of January 31, 2022, 186,500 shares remain in the Plan.
On
January 21, 2022, 163,500 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock were issued to executive officers and directors
of the Company at prices of $4.85 and $5.34 per share. The options vest immediately and expire on January 21, 2025. The fair value of
the options issued for services amounted to $532,832 and was recorded during the year ended January 31, 2022. The Company used the Black-Scholes
valuation model to record the fair value. The valuation model used a dividend rate of 0%; expected term of 1.5 years; volatility rate
of 162.69%; and risk-free rate of 1.01%.
| |
Shares | | |
Exercise
Price | | |
Remaining
Life | | |
Intrinsic
Value | |
Outstanding, January 31, 2020 | |
| - | | |
$ | - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Expired/Cancelled | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Outstanding, January 31, 2021 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| 163,500 | | |
| 4.97 | | |
| 2.97
years | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Expired/Cancelled | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Outstanding- January 31, 2022 | |
| 163,500 | | |
$ | 4.97 | | |
| 2.97 years
| | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercisable - January 31, 2022 | |
| 163,500 | | |
$ | 4.97 | | |
| 2.97 years
| | |
$ | - | |
The
following table summarizes additional information relating to the options outstanding as
of January 31, 2022:
| | |
| | |
Weighted | | |
Weighted
Average | | |
| | |
Weighted Average | | |
| |
Range of | | |
| | |
Average
Remaining | | |
Exercise
Price for | | |
| | |
Exercise
Price for | | |
| |
Exercise
Prices | | |
Number
Outstanding | | |
Contractual
Life(Years) | | |
Shares Outstanding | | |
Number
Exercisable | | |
Shares Exercisable | | |
Intrinsic
Value | |
$ | 5.34 | | |
| 40,000 | | |
| 2.97 | | |
$ | 5.34 | | |
| 40,000 | | |
$ | 5.34 | | |
$ | - | |
$ | 4.95 | | |
| 123,500 | | |
| 2.97 | | |
$ | 4.95 | | |
| 123,500 | | |
$ | 4.95 | | |
$ | - | |
We organize and manage our business
by the following two segments which meet the definition of reportable segments under ASC 280-10, Segment Reporting: Sales of Goods and
Services. These segments are based on the customer type of products or services provided and are the same as our business units. Separate
financial information is available and regularly reviewed by our chief executive officer, who is our chief operating decision maker,
in making resource allocation decisions for our segments. Our chief operating decision maker evaluates segment performance to the GAAP
measure of gross profit.
| |
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Net sales | |
| | |
| |
Sales of goods | |
$ | 1,179,620 | | |
$ | 737,519 | |
Services | |
| 242,534 | | |
| 206,183 | |
| |
| 1,422,154 | | |
| 943,702 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Gross profit | |
| | | |
| | |
Sales of goods | |
| 595,087 | | |
| 290,456 | |
Services | |
| (40,777 | ) | |
| 25,778 | |
| |
| 554,310 | | |
| 316,234 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Operating expenses | |
| | | |
| | |
Selling, general and administrative | |
| 4,022,824 | | |
| 2,912,269 | |
Research and development | |
| 411,383 | | |
| - | |
Goodwill impairment | |
| 2,180,836 | | |
| - | |
| |
| 6,615,043 | | |
| 2,912,269 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Non-Operating expenses | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest expense | |
| (118,421 | ) | |
| (280,686 | ) |
Other income (expense) | |
| 53,028 | | |
| (56,197 | ) |
| |
| (65,393 | ) | |
| (336,883 | ) |
Net loss before income taxes | |
$ | (6,126,126 | ) | |
$ | (2,932,828 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Depreciation and Amortization | |
| | | |
| | |
Sale of goods | |
$ | 220,524 | | |
$ | 87,921 | |
Services | |
| 88,217 | | |
| 72,187 | |
| |
$ | 308,741 | | |
$ | 160,108 | |
The
following table presents information about net sales and property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, in the United States
and elsewhere.
| |
Year Ended | |
| |
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Net sales: | |
| | |
| |
United States | |
$ | 1,335,554 | | |
$ | 360,378 | |
Outside the United States | |
| 86,600 | | |
| 583,324 | |
| |
$ | 1,422,154 | | |
$ | 943,702 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation | |
| | | |
| | |
United States | |
$ | 979,297 | | |
$ | 1,076,626 | |
Outside the United States | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
$ | 979,297 | | |
$ | 1,076,626 | |
12. | COMMITMENTS
AND CONTIGENCIES |
Legal
Proceedings
On
July 27, 2018, the Company commenced an action in the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida,
against Advanced Health Brands, Inc., Raymond Kalmar, Paul Murphy, Michelle Polly-Murphy, Laura Fillman and John Baker, together with
a Motion for Temporary Injunction Without Notice and a Motion for Prejudgment Writ of Replevin arising from the Company’s decision
to seek to rescind for misrepresentation the agreement by which the Company acquired advanced Health Brands, Inc. for 1,250,000 shares
of common stock valued at $2,500,000 and seek return of the shares. On August 2, 2018, the court entered a Temporary Injunction Without
Notice and an Order to Show Cause against the defendants. Defendants Kalmar, Murphy, Polly-Murphy, and Baker filed a Motion to Dismiss
the Company’s Verified Complaint, Motion to Dissolve Temporary Injunction Without Notice and Response to Order to Show Cause, and
Motion to Compel Arbitration. On January 4, 2019, the court dismissed the Company’s complaint with prejudice, and directed the
defendants to assign the Company within 30 days, the six patents never duly transferred to the Company. On February 1, 2019, the Company
appealed the court’s order. Pursuant to a settlement agreement with one of the defendants, that defendant returned the 50,000 shares
which had been issued to her, and the shares were cancelled as of January 31, 2019 . On June 7, 2019, the individual defendants (other
than the defendant whom the Company has a settlement agreement), filed a motion for sanctions and civil contempt against us, which generally
claimed that we failed to comply with the Court’s January 4, 2019, order by refusing to issue the Ruling 144 letters that would
allow the defendants to transfer their shares of common stock. On October 29, 2019, the Court denied the Defendants motion. On March
20, 2020, the Florida district court of appeal reversed the lower court ruling in the Florida state court action that dismissed our complaint,
with prejudice, and gave us leave to file an amended complaint. On July 7, 2020, Defendants filed Notice for Trial, requesting the court
to set a trial date. The Company and defendants have served their first set of interrogatories on each other and have filed answers and
responses to each other’s first set of interrogatories.
On
August 22, 2018, four of the defendants in the Florida action described in the previous paragraph filed a complaint against the Company
in the Franklin County, Ohio Court of Common Pleas seeking a declaratory judgment permitting them to sell the shares of common stock
they received pursuant to the acquisition agreement. The parties have agreed to a stay pending the outcome of the Florida litigation.
On
April 29, 2019, the Company filed a securities fraud action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New Yor k against
Raymond Kalmar, Paul Murphy, Michelle Polly-Murphy, Advanced Health Brands and TD Therapeutic, Inc. In the complaint the Company alleges
that in 2017, the defendants fraudulently and deceitfully obtained 1,250,000 shares of common stock by orchestrating a months-long scheme
to defraud the Company. The Company is seeking the return of the shares of common stock and monetary damages resulting from the defendants’
fraudulent conduct. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on August 23, 2019, and on September 13, 2019, the Company
filed its response. On July 20, 2020, the Court denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, and the parties have recently
commenced the discovery phase of the litigation. The Court has scheduled a trial date in June 2022.
Employment
Agreements
The
Company entered into a three-year employment agreement with Gareth Sheridan, our CEO, Serguei Melnik, our President, effective February
1, 2022. The agreement also provides that the executives will continue as a director. The agreement provides for an initial term, commencing
on the effective date of the agreement and ending on January 31, 2025, and continuing on a year-to-year basis thereafter unless terminated
by either party on not less than 30 days’ notice given prior to the expiration of the initial term or any one-year extension. For
their services to the Company during the term of the agreement, Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Melnik will receive an annual salary of $250,000
per annum, commencing on the effective date of the agreement. Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Melnik will also receive a performance bonus of 3.5%
of net income before income taxes.
The
Company entered into a three-year employment agreement with Gerald Goodman, our CFO, effective February 1, 2022. The agreement provides
for an initial term, commencing on the effective date of the agreement and ending on January 31, 2025, and continuing on a year-to-year
basis thereafter unless terminated by either party on not less than 30 days’ notice given prior to the expiration of the initial
term or any one-year extension. For his services to the Company during the term of the agreement, Mr. Goodman will receive an annual
salary of $210,000 per annum, commencing on the effective date of the agreement.
Rambam
Agreement
On December 9, 2020, the Company
entered into a License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Rambam Med-Tech Ltd. (“Rambam”), Haifa, Israel,
to develop the RAMBAM Closed System Transfer Device (“CTSD”) and such other products as the parties agree to develop/commercialize.
The Company will license from Rambam the full technology, IP, and title to CTSD in the field, with an Initial license fee of $50,000
and running royalties on net sales. The $50,000 license fee was paid by a third party at the direction of the Company in February 2021,
at which time the agreement became effective. As of January 31, 2022, the development of the RAMBAM CSTD Device has been suspended until
further notice as preliminary reviews and market research found the product was not commercially viable in its current form.
The
Company had entered into a prior agreement, dated November 13, 2020, with BPM Inno Ltd., Kiryat, Israel (“BPM”), that, in
consideration of BPM’s introduction of Rambam to the Company, provided for BPM to have the rights as the exclusive of agent of
the Company with Rambam and any other parties similarly introduced by BPM, and for a commission payable to BPM by the Company of 4.5%
of revenues received by the Company resulting from the introduction of Rambam (and any other companies as to which the exclusive agency
of BPM was in effect), and for BPM’s payment of a royalty to Rambam. If the Company fails to commercialize the medical products
subject to the License Agreement with Rambam within 36 months, under the November 13, 2020 agreement, BPM and the Company would share
50/50 in the revenues generated from sales of the licensed products from Rambam. This agreement further provides that it will be effective
for a period of 10 years, with either party having the right to terminate on notice given 30 days prior to the desired termination, and
also provided for certain territorial distribution rights of BPM as are set forth in the March 10, 2021 Distribution Agreement between
the Company and BPM. As of January 31, 2022, no revenues have been earned and no royalties have been accrued.
BPM
Distribution and Stock Purchase Agreements
On
March 10, 2021, the Company finalized the Distribution Agreement with BPM, providing for distribution of the medical products developed
and produced under the License Agreement. Under the Distribution Agreement, BPM has the right to distribute the medical products in Israel
and has a right of first refusal in relation to all other countries/states, other than United States, Korea, China, Vietnam, Canada and
Ecuador, which are termed excluded countries.
Kindeva
Drug Delivery Agreement
On
January 4, 2022, the Company signed a feasibility agreement with Kindeva Drug Delivery, L.P. (“Kindeva”) to develop Nutriband’s
lead product, AVERSAL Fentanyl, based on its proprietary AVERSAL abuse deterrent transdermal technology and Kindeva’s FDA-approved
transdermal fentanyl patch (fentanyl transdermal system). The feasibility agreement is focused on adapting Kindeva’s commercial
transdermal manufacturing process to incorporate AVERSAI technology.
The
agreement will remain in force until the earlier of: (1) the completion of the work and deliverables under the Workplan; or (2) two (2)
years after the Effective Date, after which time the agreement will expire.
The estimated cost to complete the
feasibility Workplan is approximately $1.7 million and the timing to complete will be between eight to twelve months. Nutriband made
an advance deposit of $250,000 in January 2022, to be applied against the final invoice. The Workplan has commenced in February 2022,
and the parties believe the Workplan will be completed in the time estimated in the agreement. As of January 31, 2022, no liabilities
have been incurred and the deposit of $250,000 is included in prepaid expenses.
On
February 1, 2022, Pocono Pharmaceuticals, Inc. entered into a lease agreement with Geometric Group, LLC for 12,000 square feet of warehouse
space currently occupied by Active Intelligence. The monthly rental is $3,000 and the lease expires on January 31, 2025. The lease can
be extended for an additional three years at the same monthly rental.
Subsequent to the year ended January
31, 2022, the Company purchased 22,058 shares of its common stock for $84,220 and recorded the transaction as Treasury Stock.
NUTRIBAND INC.
April 30, 2022
Index to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Certain information and footnote disclosures
required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted from the following
financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
NUTRIBAND INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| |
April 30, | | |
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2022 | |
| |
(Unaudited) | | |
| |
ASSETS | |
| | |
| |
CURRENT ASSETS: | |
| | |
| |
Cash
and cash equivalents | |
$ | 4,010,644 | | |
$ | 4,891,868 | |
Accounts receivable | |
| 99,098 | | |
| 71,380 | |
Inventory | |
| 127,533 | | |
| 131,648 | |
Prepaid
expenses | |
| 404,637 | | |
| 370,472 | |
Total
Current Assets | |
| 4,641,912 | | |
| 5,465,368 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
PROPERTY
& EQUIPMENT-net | |
| 1,000,873 | | |
| 979,297 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
OTHER ASSETS: | |
| | | |
| | |
Goodwill | |
| 5,349,039 | | |
| 5,349,039 | |
Operating lease
right of use asset | |
| 98,192 | | |
| 19,043 | |
Intangible
assets-net | |
| 894,459 | | |
| 926,913 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
TOTAL
ASSETS | |
$ | 11,984,475 | | |
$ | 12,739,660 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts payable
and accrued expenses | |
$ | 535,440 | | |
$ | 639,539 | |
Deferred revenue | |
| 129,986 | | |
| 106,267 | |
Operating lease
liability-current portion | |
| 33,885 | | |
| 19,331 | |
Notes
payable-current portion | |
| 23,746 | | |
| 14,119 | |
Total
Current Liabilities | |
| 723,057 | | |
| 779,256 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: | |
| | | |
| | |
Note payable-net
of current portion | |
| 115,749 | | |
| 101,119 | |
Operating
lease liability-net of current portion | |
| 65,569 | | |
| - | |
Total
Liabilities | |
| 904,375 | | |
| 880,375 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Commitments
and Contingencies | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY: | |
| | | |
| | |
Preferred stock, $.001 par value,
10,000,000 shares authorized, -0- outstanding | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Common stock, $.001 par value,
250,000,000 shares authorized; 7,871,359 shares issued at April 30, 2022 and January 31, 2022, 7,820,232 and 7,843,234 shares outstanding
as of April 30,2022 and January 31, 2022, respectively | |
| 7,820 | | |
| 7,843 | |
Additional paid-in-capital | |
| 29,967,467 | | |
| 29,967,444 | |
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss | |
| (304 | ) | |
| (304 | ) |
Treasury stock,
51,127 and 28,125 shares at cost, respectively | |
| (193,663 | ) | |
| (104,467 | ) |
Accumulated
deficit | |
| (18,701,220 | ) | |
| (18,011,231 | ) |
Total
Stockholders’ Equity | |
| 11,080,100 | | |
| 11,859,285 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
$ | 11,984,475 | | |
$ | 12,739,660 | |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
NUTRIBAND INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
| |
For the Three
Months Ended | |
| |
April 30, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Revenue | |
$ | 477,922 | | |
$ | 433,488 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Costs and expenses: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cost of revenues | |
| 277,436 | | |
| 195,610 | |
Research and development expenses | |
| 117,814 | | |
| - | |
Selling, general and administrative expenses | |
| 768,551 | | |
| 551,942 | |
Total Costs and Expenses | |
| 1,163,801 | | |
| 747,552 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Loss from operations | |
| (685,879 | ) | |
| (314,064 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Other income (expense): | |
| | | |
| | |
Gain on extinguishment of debt | |
| - | | |
| 39,876 | |
Interest expense | |
| (4,110 | ) | |
| (40,869 | ) |
Total other income (expense) | |
| (4,110 | ) | |
| (993 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Loss before provision for income taxes | |
| (689,989 | ) | |
| (315,057 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Provision for income taxes | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | (689,989 | ) | |
$ | (315,057 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss per share of common stock-basic and diluted | |
$ | (0.09 | ) | |
$ | (0.05 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding - basic and diluted | |
| 7,871,356 | | |
| 6,329,438 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Other Comprehensive Loss: | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | (689,989 | ) | |
$ | (315,057 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Foreign currency translation adjustment | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total Comprehensive Loss | |
$ | (689,989 | ) | |
$ | (315,057 | ) |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
NUTRIBAND INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended April 30, 2022
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Accumulated | | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Common Stock | | |
Additional | | |
Other | | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Number of | | |
| | |
Paid In | | |
Comprehensive | | |
Accumulated | | |
Subscription | | |
Treasury | |
| |
Total | | |
shares | | |
Amount | | |
Capital | | |
Income(Loss) | | |
Deficit | | |
Payable | | |
Stock | |
Balance, February 1, 2022 | |
$ | 11,859,285 | | |
| 7,843,234 | | |
$ | 7,843 | | |
$ | 29,967,444 | | |
$ | (304 | ) | |
$ | (18,011,231 | ) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (104,467 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Treasury stock repurchased | |
| (89,196 | ) | |
| (23,002 | ) | |
| (23 | ) | |
| 23 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| (89,196 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss for the three months ended April 30, 2022 | |
| (689,989 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (689,989 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance, April 30, 2022 | |
$ | 11,080,100 | | |
| 7,820,232 | | |
$ | 7,820 | | |
$ | 29,967,467 | | |
$ | (304 | ) | |
$ | (18,701,220 | ) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (193,663 | ) |
Three Months Ended April 30, 2021
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Accumulated | | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Common Stock | | |
Additional | | |
Other | | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
Number of | | |
| | |
Paid In | | |
Comprehensive | | |
Accumulated | | |
Subscription | | |
Treasury | |
| |
Total | | |
shares | | |
Amount | | |
Capital | | |
Income(Loss) | | |
Deficit | | |
Payable | | |
Stock | |
Balance, February 1, 2021 | |
$ | 7,111,946 | | |
| 6,256,772 | | |
$ | 6,257 | | |
$ | 18,871,098 | | |
$ | (304 | ) | |
$ | (11,835,105 | ) | |
$ | 70,000 | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for proceeds and in payment for license | |
| 640,000 | | |
| 81,396 | | |
| 81 | | |
| 699,919 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (60,000 | ) | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for services | |
| 400,000 | | |
| 18,102 | | |
| 18 | | |
| 409,982 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (10,000 | ) | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss for the three months ended April 30, 2021 | |
| (315,957 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (315,957 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance, April 30, 2021 | |
$ | 7,835,989 | | |
| 6,356,270 | | |
$ | 6,356 | | |
$ | 19,980,999 | | |
$ | (304 | ) | |
$ | (12,151,062 | ) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
NUTRIBAND INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
| |
For the Three
Months Ended | |
| |
April 30, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Cash flows from operating activities: | |
| | |
| |
Net loss | |
$ | (689,989 | ) | |
$ | (315,957 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| 77,475 | | |
| 76,262 | |
Amortization of debt discount | |
| - | | |
| 36,554 | |
Amortization of right of use asset | |
| 14,985 | | |
| - | |
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt | |
| - | | |
| (39,875 | ) |
Common stock issued for services | |
| - | | |
| 127,500 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts receivable | |
| (27,718 | ) | |
| (41,463 | ) |
Prepaid expenses | |
| (28,744 | ) | |
| (10,042 | ) |
Inventories | |
| 4,115 | | |
| (37,418 | ) |
Deferred revenue | |
| 23,719 | | |
| (16,952 | ) |
Operating lease liability | |
| (14,001 | ) | |
| - | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
| (104,099 | ) | |
| (58,024 | ) |
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities | |
| (744,257 | ) | |
| (279,415 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Purchase of equipment | |
| (43,803 | ) | |
| (38,779 | ) |
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | |
| (43,803 | ) | |
| (38,779 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from sale of common stock | |
| - | | |
| 583,000 | |
Payment on note payable | |
| (3,968 | ) | |
| - | |
Payment on finance leases | |
| - | | |
| (6,045 | ) |
Purchase of treasury stock | |
| (89,196 | ) | |
| - | |
Net Cash Provided by (used in) Financing
Activities | |
| (93,164 | ) | |
| 576,955 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Effect of exchange rate on cash | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net change in cash | |
| (881,224 | ) | |
| 258,761 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents - Beginning
of period | |
| 4,891,868 | | |
| 151,993 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents - End of
period | |
$ | 4,010,644 | | |
$ | 410,754 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplementary information: | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash paid for: | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest | |
$ | 4,110 | | |
$ | 2,715 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Income taxes | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for prepaid consulting | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 400,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Non-cash payment for license agreement | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 57,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock issued for subscription
payable | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 70,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Adoption of ASC 842 Operating lease
asset and liability | |
$ | 94,134 | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Promissory note on equipment purchase | |
$ | 22,483 | | |
$ | - | |
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
NUTRIBAND INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
as of and for the Three Months Ended April 30,
2022 and 2021
1. | ORGANIZATION
AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS |
Organization
Nutriband
Inc. (the “Company”) is a Nevada corporation, incorporated on January 4, 2016. In January 2016, the Company acquired Nutriband
Ltd, an Irish company which was formed by the Company’s chief executive officer in 2012 to enter the health and wellness market
by marketing transdermal patches. References to the Company relate to the Company and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise.
On August
1, 2018, the Company acquired 4P Therapeutics LLC (“4P Therapeutics”) for $2,250,000, consisting of 250,000 shares of common
stock, valued at $1,850,000, and $400,000, and a royalty of 6% on all revenue generated by the Company from the abuse deterrent intellectual
property that had been developed by 4P Therapeutics payable to the former owner of 4P Therapeutics. The former owner of 4P Therapeutics
has been a director of the Company since April 2018, when the Company entered into an agreement to acquire 4P Therapeutics. The former
owner resigned as a director in January 2022.
4P Therapeutics
is engaged in the development of a series of transdermal pharmaceutical products, that are in the preclinical stage of development. Prior
to the acquisition of 4P Therapeutics, the Company’s business was the development and marketing of a range of transdermal consumer
patches. Most of these products are considered drugs in the United States and cannot be marketed in the United States without approval
by the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”). The Company entered a feasibility agreement as an initial step to seek FDA
approval of its consumer transdermal products and its consumer products which are not being marketed in the United States.
With the
acquisition of 4P Therapeutics, 4P Therapeutics’ drug development business became the Company’s principal business. The Company’s
approach is to use generic drugs that are off patent and incorporate them into the Company’s transdermal drug delivery system.
Although these medications have received FDA approval in oral or injectable form, the Company needs to conduct a transdermal product
development program which will include the preclinical and clinical trials that are necessary to receive FDA approval before we can market
any of our pharmaceutical products.
On August
25, 2020, the Company formed Pocono Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Pocono Pharmaceuticals”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
On August 31, 2020, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities associated with the Transdermal, Topical, Cosmetic, and Nutraceutical
business of Pocono Coated Products LLC (“PCP”). The net assets were contributed to Pocono Pharmaceuticals. Included in the
transaction, Pocono Pharmaceuticals also acquired 100% of the membership interests of Active Intelligence LLC (“Active Intelligence”).
Pocono Pharmaceuticals
is a coated products manufacturing entity organized to take advantage of unique process capabilities and experience. Pocono helps their
customer with product design and development along with manufacturing to bring new products to market with minimal capital investment.
Pocono Pharmaceutical’s competitive edge is a low-cost manufacturing base: a result of its unique processes and state of the art
material technology. Active Intelligence manufactures activated kinesiology tape. The tape has transdermal and topical properties. This
tape is used as the same as traditional kinesiology tape.
In December
2019, COVID-19 emerged and has subsequently spread world-wide. The World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a pandemic resulting
in federal, state and local governments and private entities proscribing various restrictions, including travel restrictions, restrictions
on public gatherings, stay at home orders and advisories and quarantining people who may have been exposed to the virus. The effect of
these orders, government imposed quarantines and measures the Company and suppliers and customers it works with might have to take, such
as work-at-home policies, may negatively impact productivity, disrupt our business and could delay our clinical programs and timelines,
the magnitude of which will depend, in part, on the length and severity of the restrictions and disruptions in our operations, operating
results and financial condition. Further, quarantines, shelter-in-place and similar government orders, or the perception that such orders,
shutdowns, or other restrictions on the conduct of business could occur, related to COVID-19 or other infectious diseases could impact
personnel at third-party manufacturing facilities in the United States and other countries, or the availability or cost of materials,
which could disrupt our supply chain.
2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Unaudited
Financial Statements
The consolidated
balance sheet as of April 30, 2022, and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity,
and cash flows for the periods presented have been prepared by the Company and are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, changes
in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for all periods presented have been made. The results of the three months ended April 30,
2022, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Nutriband’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended January 31, 2022.
Certain information
and footnote disclosures required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”)
have been condensed or omitted from these consolidated financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations, including interim
reporting requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The preparation of consolidated financial
statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and the
disclosures of contingent amounts in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes. Actual results could differ from
estimates.
The Company’s
significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January
31, 2022. There were no significant changes to these accounting policies during the three months ended April 30, 2022.
Going
Concern Assessment
Management
assesses liquidity and going concern uncertainty in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements to determine whether
there is sufficient cash on hand and working capital, including available borrowings on loans, to operate for a period of at least one
year from the date the consolidated financial statements are issued or available to be issued, which is referred to as the “look-forward
period”, as defined in GAAP. As part of this assessment, based on conditions that are known and reasonably knowable to management,
management will consider various scenarios, forecasts, projections, estimates and will make certain key assumptions, including the timing
and nature of projected cash expenditures or programs, its ability to delay or curtail expenditures or programs and its ability to raise
additional capital, if necessary, among other factors. Based on this assessment, as necessary or applicable, management makes certain
assumptions around implementing curtailments or delays in the nature and timing of programs and expenditures to the extent it deems probable
those implementations can be achieved and management has the proper authority to execute them within the look-forward period.
As of April
30, 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents of $4,010,644 and working capital of $3,918,885. For the three months ended April 30, 2022,
the Company incurred an operating loss of $689,989 and used cash flow from operations of $744,257. The Company has generated operating
losses since its inception and has relied on sales of securities and issuance of third-party and related party debt to support cash flow
from operations. In October 2021, the Company consummated a public offering and received net proceeds of $5,836,230. The Company also
received $2,942,970 proceeds from the exercise of warrants.
Management
has prepared estimates of operations for fiscal year 2022 and 2023 believes that sufficient funds will be generated from operations to
fund its operations for one year from the date of the filing of these condensed consolidated financial statements, which indicates improved
operations and the Company’s ability to continue operations as a going concern. The impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s business
has been considered in these assumptions; however, it is too early to know the full impact of COVD-19 or its timing on a return to more
normal operations.
Management believes
the substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is alleviated by the above assessment.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated
financial statements of the Company include the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated. The operations of 4P Therapeutics are included in the Company’s financial statements from the date of acquisition
of August 1, 2018, and the operations of Pocono and Active Intelligence are included in the Company’s financial statements from
the date of acquisition of September 1, 2020. The wholly owned subsidiaries are as follows:
Nutriband
Ltd.
4P
Therapeutics LLC
Pocono
Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Use
of Estimates
The preparation
of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses,
and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates including, but
not limited to, those related to such items as income tax exposures, accruals, depreciable/useful lives, allowance for doubtful accounts
and valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on other various assumptions that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets
and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
In May 2014,
the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which amends the
accounting standards for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is based on principles that govern the recognition of revenue at an amount
an entity expects to be entitled when products are transferred to a customer. The Company adopted the guidance under the new revenue
standards using the modified retrospective method effective February 1, 2018 and determined no cumulative effect adjusted to retained
earnings was necessary upon adoption. Topic 606 requires the Company to recognize revenues when control of the promised goods or services
and receipt of payment is probable. The Company recognizes revenue based on the five criteria for revenue recognition established under
Topic 606: 1) identify the contract, 2) identify separate performance obligations, 3) determine the transaction price, 4) allocate the
transaction price among the performance obligations, and 5) recognize revenue as the performance obligations are satisfied.
Revenue
Types
The following
is a description of the Company’s revenue types, which include professional services and sale of goods:
| ● | Service revenues include
the contract of research and development related services with the Company’s clients
in the life sciences field on an as-needed basis. Deliverables primarily consist of detailed
findings and conclusion reports provided to the client for each given research project engaged. |
| ● | Product revenues are derived
from the sale of the Company’s consumer transdermal and coated products. Upon the reception
of a purchase order, we have the order filled and shipped. |
Contracts with Customers
A contract with a customer exists
when (i) we enter into an enforceable contract with a customer that defines each party’s rights regarding the goods or services
to be transferred and identifies the payment terms related to these goods or services, (ii) the contract has commercial substance and,
(iii) we determine that collection of substantially all consideration for services that are transferred is probable based on the customer’s
intent and ability to pay the promised consideration.
Contract Liabilities
Deferred revenue is a liability related
to a revenue producing activity for which revenue has not been recognized. The Company records deferred revenue when it receives consideration
from a contract before achieving certain criteria that must be met for revenue to be recognized in conformity with GAAP.
Performance Obligations
A performance obligation is a promise
in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer and is the unit of account in the new revenue standard. The contract
transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation
is satisfied. For the Company’s different revenue service types, the performance obligation is satisfied at different times. The
Company’s performance obligations include providing products and professional services in the area of research. The Company recognizes
product revenue performance obligations in most cases when the product has shipped to the customer. When we perform professional service
work, we recognize revenue when we have the right to invoice the customer for the work completed, which typically occurs over time on
a monthly basis for the work performed during that month.
All revenue
recognized in the income statement is considered to be revenue from contracts with customers.
Disaggregation of Revenues
The Company
disaggregates its revenue from contracts with customers by type and by geographical location. See the tables:
| |
Three Months Ended April 30, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Revenue by type Sale of goods | |
$ | 401,990 | | |
$ | 327,512 | |
Services | |
| 75,932 | | |
| 105,976 | |
Total | |
$ | 477,922 | | |
$ | 433,488 | |
| |
Three Months Ended April 30, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Revenue by geographic location: | |
| | |
| |
United States | |
$ | 477,922 | | |
$ | 346,888 | |
Foreign | |
| - | | |
| 86,600 | |
| |
$ | 477,922 | | |
$ | 433,488 | |
Accounts
receivable
Trade accounts
receivables are recorded at the net invoice value and are not interest bearing. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts
for estimated losses from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The Company determines its allowances by both specific
identification of customer accounts where appropriate and the application of historical loss to non-applicable accounts. For the three
months ended April 30, 2022 and 2021, the Company recorded no bad debt expense for doubtful accounts related to account receivable.
Inventories
Inventories
are valued at the lower of cost and reasonable value determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Net realized value is the
estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable selling expenses. The cost of finished goods and
work in process is comprised of material costs, direct labor costs and other direct costs and related production overheads (based on
normal operating capacity). As of April 30, 2022 and January 31, 2022, 100% of the inventory consists of raw materials.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property
and equipment represent an important component of the Company’s assets. The Company depreciates its plant and equipment on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost. Expenditures for minor
repairs, maintenance and replacement parts which do not increase the useful lives of the assets are charged to expense as incurred. All
major additions and improvements are capitalized. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. The lives over which the fixed
assets are depreciated range from 3 to 20 years as follows:
Lab Equipment |
5-10 years |
Furniture and fixtures
|
3 years |
Machinery and equipment |
10-20 years |
Intangible
Assets
Intangible
assets include trademarks, intellectual property and customer base acquired through business combinations. The Company accounts for Other
Intangible Assets under the guidance of ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other.” The Company capitalizes certain costs
related to patent technology. A substantial component of the purchase price related to the Company’s acquisitions have also been
assigned to intellectual property and other intangibles. Under the guidance, other intangible assets with definite lives are amortized
over their estimated useful lives. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested annually for impairment. Trademarks, intellectual
property and customer base are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of ten years.
Goodwill
Goodwill
represents the difference between the total purchase price and the fair value of assets (tangible and intangible) and liabilities at
the date of acquisition. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually on January 31, and more frequently as circumstances warrant, and
written down only in the period in which the recorded value of such assets exceeds their fair value. The Company does not amortize goodwill
in accordance with ASC 350. In connection with the Company’s acquisition of 4P Therapeutics LLC in 2018, the Company recorded Goodwill
of $1,719,235. On August 31, 2020, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Pocono Coated Products LLC and Active Intelligence
LLC, the Company recorded Goodwill of $5,810,640. During the year ended January 31, 2022, the Company recorded an impairment charge of
$2,180,836 reducing the Active Intelligence LLC Goodwill to $3,629,813. As of April 30, 2022 and January 31, 2022, Goodwill amounted
to $5,349,039.
Long-lived
Assets
Management
reviews long-lived assets for potential impairment whenever significant events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment exists when the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable and
exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the estimated undiscounted
cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If an impairment exists, the resulting write-down would
be the difference between the fair market value of the long-lived asset and the related book value.
Earnings
per Share
Basic earnings
per share of common stock is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during
the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common
stock and potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Potential shares of common stock consist of shares issuable
upon the exercise of outstanding options and common stock purchase warrants. As of April 30, 2022, and 2021, there were 1,394,034 and
141,830 common stock equivalents outstanding, that were not included in the calculation of dilutive earnings per share as their effect
would be anti-dilutive.
Stock-Based
Compensation
ASC 718,
“Compensation - Stock Compensation,” prescribes accounting and reporting standards for all share-based payment transactions
in which employee services, and, since February 1, 2019, non-employees, are acquired. Transactions include incurring liabilities, or
issuing or offering to issue shares, options and other equity instruments such as employee stock ownership plans and stock appreciation
rights. Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the
financial statements based on their fair values. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide
services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). As of February 1, 2019, pursuant
to ASC 2018-07, ASC 718 was applied to stock-based compensation for both employees and non-employees.
Business
Combinations
The Company
recognizes the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquired entity at the acquisition date,
measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the accounting literature. In accordance with this
guidance, acquisition-related costs, including restructuring costs, must be recognized separately from the acquisition and will generally
be expensed as incurred. That replaces the cost-allocation process detailed in previous accounting literature, which required the cost
of an acquisition to be allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value.
Leases
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases” (Topic 842), to provide a new comprehensive model for lease accounting
under this guidance, lessees and lessors should apply a “right-of-use” model in accounting for all leases (including subleases)
and eliminate the concept of operating leases and off-balance-sheet leases. Recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses will
depend on classification as a finance or operating lease. Similar modifications have been made to lessor accounting in-line with revenue
recognition guidance.
The
Company adopted ASU 2016-02 as amended effective February 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach. In connection with the adoption,
the Company elected to utilize the Comparative Under 840 Option whereby the Company will continue to present prior period financial statements
and disclosures under ASC 840. In addition, the Company elected the transition package of three practical expedients permitted under
the standard, which eliminates the requirements to reassess prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial
direct costs. The Company completed the necessary changes to its accounting policies, processes, disclosure and internal control over
financial reporting.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Income
Taxes
Taxes are
calculated in accordance with taxation principles currently effective in the United States and Ireland.
The Company
accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities
for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets
and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect
of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company
records net deferred tax assets to the extent they believe these assets will more-likely-than-not be realized. In making such
determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary
differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In the event the Company
was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount,
the Company would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
Fair
Value Measurements
FASB ASC
820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure” (“ASC 820”), defines fair value as the exchange price that would
be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC
820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value.
The Company
utilizes the accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures for all financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial
assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis during
the reporting period. The fair value is an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants based upon the best use of the asset or liability at the measurement
date. The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. ASC 820 establishes
a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers are defined as follows:
|
Level 1 |
- |
Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active
markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 |
- |
Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that
are either directly or indirectly observable. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 |
- |
Unobservable inputs about
which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. |
The carrying
value of the Company’s financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, and accrued
expenses approximate their fair value due to the short maturities of these financial instruments.
Reclassification
The Company
has reclassified prior year amounts to show the allocation of depreciation expense to cost of goods sold.
Recent
Accounting Standards
In October
2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts
with Customers, which clarifies how to properly account for deferred revenue in a business combination. ASU 2021-08 is effective for
periods after December 15, 2022. The Company adopted ASU 2021-08 on February 1, 2022. The adoption of ASU 2021-08 did not have a material
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The Company
has reviewed all other FASB-issued ASU accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effective dates during the period
reported and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous GAAP and does not believe
that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the Company’s reported financial position or operations in the
near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of the Company’s financial management and certain
standards are under consideration.
| |
April 30, | | |
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2022 | |
Lab equipment | |
$ | 144,585 | | |
$ | 144,585 | |
Machinery and equipment | |
| 1,205,127 | | |
| 1,138,530 | |
Furniture and fixtures | |
| 19,643 | | |
| 19,643 | |
| |
| 1,369,355 | | |
| 1,302,758 | |
Less: Accumulated depreciation | |
| (368,482 | ) | |
| (323,461 | ) |
Net Property and Equipment | |
$ | 1,000,873 | | |
$ | 979,297 | |
Depreciation
expense amounted to $45,021 and $43,808 for the three months ended April 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. During the three months
ended April 30. 2022 and 2021, depreciation expense of $27,693 and $27,166, respectively, have been allocated to cost of goods sold.
Notes
Payable
On March
21, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES ACT” was enacted. The CARES ACT established the Paycheck
Protection Program (“PPP”) which funds small businesses through federally guaranteed loans. Under the PPP, companies are
eligible for forgiveness of principal and interest if the proceeds are used for eligible payroll costs, rent and utility costs. On June
17, 2020, the Company’s subsidiary, 4P Therapeutics, was advanced $34,870 under the PPP, all of which was forgiven as of April
30, 2021. The Company recorded a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $34,870 during the three months ended April 30, 2021.
In
July 2020, a minority shareholder made an additional loan to the Company in the amount of $100,000. The loan is interest-free and due
upon demand. In October 2021, the loan was converted into 17,182 common shares of the Company. The shares were issued at fair market
value and no gain or loss was recorded for the transaction.
Active Intelligence,
the Company’s newly acquired subsidiary, entered into an agreement with the Carolina Small Business Development Fund for a line
of credit of $160,000 due October 16, 2029, with interest of 5% per year. The amount assumed in Note 3 was $139,184. The loan requires
monthly payments of principal and interest of $1,697. During the year ended January 31, 2022, principal and interest payments of $8,344
were forgiven under the Cares Act. The amount, $8,344, has been recorded as a gain on the forgiveness of debt. During the three months
ended April 30, 2022, the Company made principal payments of $3,647. As of April 30, 2022, the amount due was $111,591, of which $14,119
is current.
On April
3, 2022, the Company entered into a retail installment agreement for the purchase of an automobile. The contract price was $32,274, of
which $22,795 was financed. The agreement is for five years bearing interest at 2.95% per annum with payments of $495 per month. The
loan is secured by automobile. As of April 30, 2022, the amount due was $22,483 of which $3,960 is current.
Finance
Leases
Pocono had
two finance leases secured by equipment. The leases mature in 2025 and 2026. The incremental borrowing rate is 5.0%. The amount due on
the leases was $121,544, all of which was paid during the year ended January 2022.
Related
Party Payable
On August
31, 2020, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Pocono Products LLC, the Company issued to Pocono Coated Products LLC
a promissory note, net of debt discount, in the amount of $1,332,893 with interest accruing at an annual rate of 0.17%, due on August
28, 2021, or immediately following the earlier of a capital raise of no less than $4,000,000 and/or a public offering of no less than
$4,000,000. The members of Pocono Coated Products LLC, which include Mike Myer who was a related party, are shareholders of the Company.
During the three months ended April 30, 2021, the Company recorded amortization of debt discount of $36,554. In October 2021, the note
in the amount of $1,500,000 was paid in full.
Interest
expense for the three months ended April 30, 2022, was $4,110. Interest expense for the three months ended April 30, 2021, was $40,869
including the amortization of debt discount of $36,554 and interest expense of $4,315.
As of April 30, 2022 and January
31, 2022, intangible assets consisted of intellectual property and trademarks, customer base, and license agreement, net of amortization,
as follows:
| |
April 30, | | |
January 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2022 | |
Customer base | |
$ | 314,100 | | |
$ | 314,100 | |
License agreement | |
| 50,000 | | |
| 50,000 | |
Intellectual property and trademarks | |
| 817,400 | | |
| 817,400 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total | |
| 1,181,500 | | |
| 1,181,500 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Less: Accumulated amortization | |
| (287,031 | ) | |
| (254,587 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net Intangible Assets | |
$ | 894,469 | | |
$ | 926,913 | |
In February
2021, the Company acquired an IP license for $50,000, see Note 8- “Rambam Agreement” for further discussion regarding the
license agreement. The value of the intangible assets, consisting of intellectual property, license agreement and customer base has been
recorded at their fair value by the Company and are being amortized over a period of three to ten years. Amortization expense for the
three months ended April 30, 2022, and 2021 was $32,454 and $32,454, respectively.
Year Ended January 31, | |
| |
2023 | |
$ | 97,332 | |
2024 | |
| 129,776 | |
2025 | |
| 113,109 | |
2026 | |
| 113,109 | |
2027 | |
| 113,109 | |
2028 and thereafter | |
| 328,034 | |
| |
$ | 894,469 | |
5. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
| a) | In connection with the acquisition
of Pocono, the Company recorded various transactions and operations through Pocono Coated
Products LLC, of which Mike Myer was a related party. During the year ended January 31, 2022,
the Company was advanced $7,862 in finance payments. As of January 31, 2022, the balance
due Pocono was paid in full. The Company also issued a note in the amount of $1,500,000 to
Pocono Coated Products LLC. In October 2021, the related party note payable was repaid. See
Note 3 for further discussion. |
Preferred Stock
On January 15, 2016, the board of
directors of the Company approved a certificate of amendment to the articles of incorporation and changed the authorized capital stock
of the Company to include and authorize 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share.
On May 24, 2019, the board of directors
created a series of preferred stock consisting of 2,500,000 shares designated as the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series
A Preferred Stock”). On June 20, 2019, the Series A preferred Stock was terminated, and the 2,500,000 shares were restored to the
status of authorized but unissued shares of Preferred Stock, without designation as to series, until such stock is once more designated
as part of a particular series by the board of directors.
Common Stock
On June 25, 2019, the Company effected
a one-for-four reverse stock split, pursuant to which each share of common stock became converted into 0.25 shares of common stock, and
the Company decreased its authorized common stock from 100,000,000 to 25,000,000 shares.
On January 27, 2020, the Company amended
its articles of incorporation to increase its authorized common shares from 25,000,000 shares to 250,000,000 shares.
Activity during the Three Months
Ended April 30, 2022
| (a) | In March 2022, the Company purchased
22,058 shares of its common stock for $89,196 and recorded the purchase as Treasury Stock.
As of April 30, 2022, the Company holds 50,183 of its shares comprising the $193,663 of treasury
stock. |
Activity during the Three Months
Ended April 30, 2021
| (a) | On February 25, 2021, in connection
with the Company’s License Agreement with Rambam, pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement
with BPM Inno Ltd (“BPM”), the Company issued 81,396 shares of common stock to
BPM and received proceeds of $700,000 to be applied to product development expenses under
the License Agreement. The Company entered into the Stock Purchase Agreement with BPM in
December 2020 and received a payment of $60,000 which is included in Stockholders’
Equity as Subscription Payable in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of January
31, 2021. In February 2021, BPM advanced a payment for the Company to Rambam in the amount
of $57,000 for the license fee. The balance of the funds of $583,000 was received in February
2021. On February 15, 2021, the Company issued 12,500 shares of common stock, valued at $350,000,
for consulting fees in connection with the Rambam License Agreement discussed in Note 8. |
| (b) | On February 25, 2021, the Company
issued 5,602 shares of common stock, valued at $60,000, for consulting services pursuant
to a consultant agreement commencing December 1, 2020. The Company has reflected $10,000
representing 934 shares as Subscription Payable in the Stockholders’ Equity in the
Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2021. |
Subscription Payable
| (a) | On February 25, 2021, in connection
with the Company’s License Agreement with Rambam, pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement
with BPM Inno Ltd (“BPM”), the Company issued 81,396 shares of common stock to
BPM and received proceeds of $700,000 to be applied to product development expenses under
the License Agreement. The Company entered into the Stock Purchase Agreement with BPM in
December 2020 and received a payment of $60,000 which is included in Stockholders’
Equity as Subscription in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of January 31,
2021. The balance of the funds was received in February 2021. |
| (b) | On February 25,2021, the Company
issued 5,602 shares of common stock, valued at $60,000, for consulting services pursuant
to a consultant agreement commencing December 1, 2020. The Company has reflected $10,000
representing 934 shares as Subscription Payable in the Stockholders’ Equity in the
Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2021. |
Warrants
The following table summarizes the
changes in warrants outstanding and the related price of the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to management (75,000
warrants were issued to the Chief Financial Officer) and non-employees of the Company.
| |
| | |
Exercise | | |
Remaining | | |
Intrinsic | |
| |
Shares | | |
Price | | |
Life | | |
Value | |
Outstanding, January 31, 2021 | |
| 141,828 | | |
$ | 11.99 | | |
| 2.16
years | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| 1,517,200 | | |
| 7.23 | | |
| 4.70
years | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Expired/Cancelled | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercised | |
| (428,496 | ) | |
| 7.39 | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Outstanding, January 31, 2022 | |
| 1,230,532 | | |
| 7.35 | | |
| 3.93
years | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Expired/Cancelled | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Outstanding - April 30, 2022 | |
| 1,230,532 | | |
$ | 7.35 | | |
| 3.75 years
| | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercisable - April 30, 2022 | |
| 1,230,532 | | |
$ | 7.35 | | |
| 3.75 years
| | |
$ | - | |
The following
table summarizes additional information relating to the warrants outstanding as of April 30, 2022:
Range of Exercise Prices | | |
Number
Outstanding | | |
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life(Years) | | |
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
for Shares
Outstanding | | |
Number
Exercisable | | |
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
for Shares
Exercisable | | |
Intrinsic
Value | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
$ | 6.25 | | |
| 131,100 | | |
| 0.75 | | |
$ | 6.25 | | |
| 131,100 | | |
$ | 6.25 | | |
$ | - | |
$ | 14.00 | | |
| 46,828 | | |
| 1.24 | | |
$ | 14.00 | | |
| 46,828 | | |
$ | 14.00 | | |
$ | - | |
$ | 7.50 | | |
| 927,604 | | |
| 4.68 | | |
$ | 7.50 | | |
| 822,004 | | |
$ | 7.50 | | |
$ | - | |
$ | 4.90 | | |
| 125,000 | | |
| 2.73 | | |
$ | 4.90 | | |
| 125,000 | | |
$ | 4.90 | | |
$ | - | |
Options
The following table summarizes the
changes in options outstanding and the related price of the shares of the Company’s common stock issued to employees of the Company.
On November 1, 2021, The Board of
Directors adopted the 2021 Employee Stock Option Plan (the”Plan”). The Company has reserved 350,000 shares to issue and sell
upon the exercise of stock options. The options vest immediately upon issuance and expire in three years. Under the Plan, options may
be granted which are intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options (“ISOs”) under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986 (the “Code”) or which are not (“non-ISOs”) intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options thereafter.
The Plan also provides for restricted stock awards representing shares of common stock that are issued subject to such restrictions on
transfer and other incidents of ownership and such forfeiture conditions as the Board of Directors, or the committee administering the
Plan composed of directors who qualify as “independent” under Nasdaq rules, may determine. On November 3, 2021, the Committee
filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8, to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, 350,000 shares of common stock
reserved for issuance under the Plan. As of April 30, 2022, 186,500 shares remain in the Plan.
| |
| | |
Exercise | | |
Remaining | | |
Intrinsic | |
| |
Shares | | |
Price | | |
Life | | |
Value | |
Outstanding, January 31, 2021 | |
| - | | |
$ | - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| 163,500 | | |
| 4.97 | | |
| 2.97
years | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Expired/Cancelled | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Outstanding, January 31, 2022 | |
| 163,500 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Expired/Cancelled | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Outstanding - April 30, 2022 | |
| 163,500 | | |
$ | 4.97 | | |
| 2.75 years
| | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Exercisable - April 30, 2022 | |
| 163,500 | | |
$ | 4.97 | | |
| 2.75 years
| | |
$ | - | |
The following table summarizes additional
information relating to the options outstanding as of April 30, 2022:
Range of Exercise Prices | | |
Number
Outstanding | | |
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life(Years) | | |
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
for Shares
Outstanding | | |
Number
Exercisable | | |
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
for Shares
Exercisable | | |
Intrinsic
Value | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
$ | 5.34 | | |
| 40,000 | | |
| 2.75 | | |
$ | 5.34 | | |
| 40,000 | | |
$ | 5.34 | | |
$ | - | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
| 123,500 | | |
| 2.75 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
| 123,500 | | |
$ | 4.85 | | |
$ | - | |
8. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTIGENCIES |
Legal Proceedings
On July 27, 2018, the Company commenced
an action in the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Orange County, Florida, against Advanced Health Brands, Inc.,
Raymond Kalmar, Paul Murphy, Michelle Polly-Murphy, Laura Fillman and John Baker, together with a Motion for Temporary Injunction Without
Notice and a Motion for Prejudgment Writ of Replevin arising from the Company’s decision to seek to rescind for misrepresentation
the agreement by which the Company acquired advanced Health Brands, Inc. for 1,250,000 shares of common stock valued at $2,500,000 and
seek return of the shares. On August 2, 2018, the court entered a Temporary Injunction Without Notice and an Order to Show Cause against
the defendants. Defendants Kalmar, Murphy, Polly-Murphy, and Baker filed a Motion to Dismiss the Company’s Verified Complaint,
Motion to Dissolve Temporary Injunction Without Notice and Response to Order to Show Cause, and Motion to Compel Arbitration. On January
4, 2019, the court dismissed the Company’s complaint with prejudice, and directed the defendants to assign the Company within 30
days, the six patents never duly transferred to the Company. On February 1, 2019, the Company appealed the court’s order. Pursuant
to a settlement agreement with one of the defendants, that defendant returned the 50,000 shares which had been issued to her, and the
shares were cancelled as of January 31, 2019. On June 7, 2019, the individual defendants (other than the defendant whom the Company has
a settlement agreement), filed a motion for sanctions and civil contempt against us, which generally claimed that we failed to comply
with the Court’s January 4, 2019, order by refusing to issue the Ruling 144 letters that would allow the defendants to transfer
their shares of common stock. On October 29, 2019, the Court denied the Defendants motion. On March 20, 2020, the Florida district court
of appeal reversed the lower court ruling in the Florida state court action that dismissed our complaint, with prejudice, and gave us
leave to file an amended complaint. On July 7, 2020, Defendants filed Notice for Trial, requesting the court to set a trial date. The
Company and defendants have served their first set of interrogatories on each other and have filed answers and responses to each other’s
first set of interrogatories.
On August 22, 2018, four of the defendants
in the Florida action described in the previous paragraph filed a complaint against the Company in the Franklin County, Ohio Court of
Common Pleas seeking a declaratory judgment permitting them to sell the shares of common stock they received pursuant to the acquisition
agreement. The parties have agreed to a stay pending the outcome of the Florida litigation.
On April 29, 2019, the Company filed
a securities fraud action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York against Raymond Kalmar, Paul Murphy, Michelle
Polly-Murphy, Advanced Health Brands and TD Therapeutic, Inc. In the complaint the Company alleges that in 2017, the defendants fraudulently
and deceitfully obtained 1,250,000 shares of common stock by orchestrating a months-long scheme to defraud the Company. The Company is
seeking the return of the shares of common stock and monetary damages resulting from the defendants’ fraudulent conduct. The defendants
filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on August 23, 2019, and on September 13, 2019, the Company filed its response. On July 20, 2020,
the Court denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, and the parties have recently commenced the discovery phase of
the litigation. The Court has scheduled a trial date in June 2022.
Employment Agreements
The Company entered into a three-year
employment agreement with Gareth Sheridan, our CEO, Serguei Melnik, our President, effective February 1, 2022. The agreement also provides
that the executives will continue as a director. The agreement provides for an initial term, commencing on the effective date of the
agreement and ending on January 31, 2025, and continuing on a year-to-year basis thereafter unless terminated by either party on not
less than 30 days’ notice given prior to the expiration of the initial term or any one-year extension. For their services to the
Company during the term of the agreement, Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Melnik will receive an annual salary of $250,000 per annum, commencing
on the effective date of the agreement. Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Melnik will also receive a performance bonus of 3.5% of net income before
income taxes.
The Company entered into a three-year
employment agreement with Gerald Goodman, our CFO, effective February 1, 2022. The agreement provides for an initial term, commencing
on the effective date of the agreement and ending on January 31, 2025, and continuing on a year-to-year basis thereafter unless terminated
by either party on not less than 30 days’ notice given prior to the expiration of the initial term or any one-year extension. For
his services to the Company during the term of the agreement, Mr. Goodman will receive an annual salary of $210,000 per annum, commencing
on the effective date of the agreement.
Rambam Agreement
On December 9, 2020, the Company entered
into a License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Rambam Med-Tech Ltd. (“Rambam”), Haifa, Israel, to develop
the RAMBAM Closed System Transfer Device (“CTSD”) and such other products as the parties agree to develop/commercialize.
The Company will license from Rambam the full technology, IP, and title to CTSD in the field, with an Initial license fee of $50,000
and running royalties on net sales. The $50,000 license fee was paid by a third party at the direction of the Company in February 2021,
at which time the agreement became effective. As of April 30, 2022, the development of the RAMBAM CSTD Device has been suspended until
further notice as preliminary reviews and market research found the product was not commercially viable in its current form.
The Company had entered into a prior
agreement, dated November 13, 2020, with BPM Inno Ltd., Kiryat, Israel (“BPM”), that, in consideration of BPM’s introduction
of Rambam to the Company, provided for BPM to have the rights as the exclusive of agent of the Company with Rambam and any other parties
similarly introduced by BPM, and for a commission payable to BPM by the Company of 4.5% of revenues received by the Company resulting
from the introduction of Rambam (and any other companies as to which the exclusive agency of BPM was in effect), and for BPM’s
payment of a royalty to Rambam. If the Company fails to commercialize the medical products subject to the License Agreement with Rambam
within 36 months, under the November 13, 2020 agreement, BPM and the Company would share 50/50 in the revenues generated from sales of
the licensed products from Rambam. This agreement further provides that it will be effective for a period of 10 years, with either party
having the right to terminate on notice given 30 days prior to the desired termination, and also provided for certain territorial distribution
rights of BPM as are set forth in the March 10, 2021 Distribution Agreement between the Company and BPM. As of April 30, 2022, no revenues
have been earned and royalties have been accrued.
BPM Distribution and Stock Purchase
Agreements
On March 10, 2021, the Company finalized
the Distribution Agreement with BPM, providing for distribution of the medical products developed and produced under the License Agreement.
Under the Distribution Agreement, BPM has the right to distribute the medical products in Israel and has a right of first refusal
in relation to all other countries/states, other than United States, Korea, China, Vietnam, Canada and Ecuador, which are termed excluded
countries.
Kindeva Drug Delivery
Agreement
On January 4, 2022, the Company signed
a feasibility agreement with Kindeva Drug Delivery, L.P. (“Kindeva”) to develop Nutriband’s lead product, AVERSAL Fentanyl,
based on its proprietary AVERSAL abuse deterrent transdermal technology and Kindeva’s FDA-approved transdermal fentanyl patch (fentanyl
transdermal system). The feasibility agreement is focused on adapting Kindeva’s commercial transdermal manufacturing process to
incorporate AVERSAI technology.
The agreement will remain in force
until the earlier of: (1) the completion of the work and deliverables under the Workplan; or (2) two (2) years after the Effective Date,
after which time the agreement will expire.
The estimated cost to complete the
feasibility Workplan is approximately $1.7 million and the timing to complete will be between eight to twelve months. Nutriband made
an advance deposit of $250,000 in January 2022, to be applied against the final invoice. The Workplan has commenced in February 2022,
and the parties believe the Workplan will be completed in the time estimated in the agreement. As of April 30, 2022, the Company has
incurred expenses of $36,000 and the deposit of $250,000 is included in prepaid expenses.
Lease Agreement
On February 1, 2022, Pocono Pharmaceuticals
entered into a lease agreement with Geometric Group, LLC for 12,000 square feet of warehouse space currently occupied by Active Intelligence.
The monthly rental is $3,000 and the lease expires on January 31, 2025. The lease can be extended for an additional three years at the
same monthly rental. The Company recorded a Right of Use asset in the amount of $94,134 in connection with the valuation using an incremental
borrowing rate of 9%. During the three months ended April 30, 2022, the Company paid $9,000 and recorded rent expense of $7,844. As of
April 30, 2022, the operating lease liability was $87,235, of which $65,569 is long-term, which represents the operating liability less
interest of $11,765.
| |
Three Months Ended April 30,2022 | |
| |
Transdermal Patches | | |
Contract Services | | |
Total | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| |
Revenue | |
$ | 401,990 | | |
$ | 75,932 | | |
$ | 477,922 | |
Gross Profit | |
| 198,059 | | |
| 2,427 | | |
| 200,486 | |
Gross Profit % | |
| 49 | % | |
| 3 | % | |
| 42 | % |
| |
Three Months Ended April 30,2021 | |
| |
Transdermal Patches | | |
Contract Services | | |
Total | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| |
Revenue | |
$ | 327,512 | | |
$ | 105,976 | | |
$ | 433,488 | |
Gross Profit | |
| 216,800 | | |
| 20,998 | | |
| 237,878 | |
Gross Profit % | |
| 66 | % | |
| 19 | % | |
| 55 | % |
Subsequent to April 30, 2022, the
Company purchased 944 shares of its common stock for $3,746 and recorded the transaction as Treasury Stock. On May 10, 2022, the Company
issued 24,500 shares to management, directors and employees from the treasury shares. The issuance of the shares was recorded as compensation
and the fair value at the date of issuance was $93,100.
EXPERTS
Our financial statements included in this prospectus
as of January 31, 2022 and 2021 have been included in reliance on the reports of Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC, an independent
registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains an
Internet site which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding registrants that file electronically
with the Commission at the address: www.sec.gov.
Nutriband (NASDAQ:NTRB)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Out 2024 até Nov 2024
Nutriband (NASDAQ:NTRB)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Nov 2023 até Nov 2024