NVOS Novo Integrated Sciences Inc (PK)

RISK FACTORS

Material factors that may adversely affect our business and operations are summarized below. The risks and uncertainties described herein may not be the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factor Summary” above.

History of operating losses and negative cash flow.

For the fiscal years ended August 31, 2020 and 2019, we reported net losses of $ 4,924,209 and $403,579, respectively, and negative cash flow from operating activities of $441,694 and $822,268, respectively. As of August 31, 2020, we had an aggregate accumulated deficit of $16,507,127.

Such losses have historically required us to seek additional funding through the issuance of debt or equity securities. Our long-term success is dependent upon among other things, achieving positive cash flows from operations and if necessary, augmenting such cash flows using external resources to satisfy our cash needs. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funding, if needed, on commercially reasonable terms, or of all.

Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. These adjustments would likely include substantial impairment of the carrying amount of our assets and potential contingent liabilities that may arise if we are unable to fulfill various operational commitments. In addition, the value of our securities would be greatly impaired. Our long-term success is dependent upon generating sufficient cash flow from operations and obtaining additional capital and financing. If our ability to generate cash flow from operations is delayed or reduced and we are unable to raise additional funding from other sources, we may be unable to continue in business.

Novo Integrated Sciences, Inc. is a parent company and depends upon our subsidiaries for our cash flows.

We are a parent company. All of our operations are conducted, and some of our assets are owned, by our subsidiaries. Consequently, our cash flows and our ability to meet our obligations depend upon the cash flows of our subsidiaries and the payment of funds by these subsidiaries to us in the form of dividends, distributions or otherwise. The ability of our subsidiaries to make any payments to us depends on their earnings, the terms of their indebtedness, including the terms of any credit facilities and legal restrictions. Any failure to receive dividends or distributions from our subsidiaries when needed could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Future acquisitions or strategic investments could disrupt our business and harm our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We may in the future explore potential acquisitions of companies or strategic investments to strengthen our business. Even if we identify an appropriate acquisition candidate, we may not be successful in negotiating the terms or financing of the acquisition, and our due diligence may fail to identify all of the problems, liabilities or other shortcomings or challenges of an acquired business.

Acquisitions involve numerous risks, any of which could harm our business, including:

●       straining our financial resources to acquire a company;

●       anticipated benefits may not materialize as rapidly as we expect, or at all;

●       diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to address acquisition integration challenges;

●       retention of employees from the acquired company;

●       cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into our organization;

●       integration of the acquired company’s accounting, management information, human resources and other administrative systems;

●       the need to implement or improve controls, procedures and policies at a business that prior to the acquisition may have lacked effective controls, procedures and policies; and

●       litigation or other claims in connection with the acquired company, including claims from terminated employees, former stockholders or other third parties.

Failure to appropriately mitigate these risks or other issues related to such strategic investments and acquisitions could result in reducing or eliminating any anticipated benefits of transactions and harm our business generally. Future acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, amortization expenses or the impairment of goodwill, any of which could have a material adverse effect on business, results of operations or financial condition.

We may require additional funding for our growth plans, and such funding may result in a dilution of your investment.

We have estimated our funding requirements in order to implement our growth plans. If the costs of implementing such plans should exceed these estimates significantly or if we come across opportunities to grow through expansion plans which cannot be predicted at this time, and our funds generated from our operations prove insufficient for such purposes, we may need to raise additional funds to meet these funding requirements.

These additional funds may be raised by issuing equity or debt securities or by borrowing from banks or other resources. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain any additional financing on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If we fail to obtain additional financing on terms that are acceptable to us, we will not be able to implement such plans fully if at all. Such financing even if obtained, may be accompanied by conditions that limit our ability to pay dividends or require us to seek lenders’ consent for payment of dividends, or restrict our freedom to operate our business by requiring lender’s consent for certain corporate actions.

Further, if we raise additional funds by way of a rights offering or through the issuance of new shares, any shareholders who are unable or unwilling to participate in such an additional round of fund raising may suffer dilution in their investment.

Most of our executive officers do not reside in the United State.

Our U.S. stockholders would face difficulty in:

●       Effecting service of process within the United States on most of our executive officers, if considered necessary.

●       Enforcing judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against the executive officers.

●       Enforcing judgments of U.S. courts based on civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws in foreign courts against the executive officers.

●       Bringing an original action in foreign courts to enforce liabilities based on the U.S. federal securities laws against the executive officers.

Accordingly, persons contemplating an investment in our common stock should seriously consider these factors before making an investment decision.

Robert Mattacchione, our Chief Executive Officer, has voting control, which will limit your ability to influence the outcome of important transactions, including a change in control.

As of February 19, 2021, Mr. Mattacchione, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owns shares representing approximately 54.3% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock. As a result, Mr. Mattacchione controls a majority voting power and therefore is able to control all matters submitted to our shareholders for approval. Mr. Mattacchione may have interests that differ from yours and may vote in a way with which you disagree and which may be adverse to your interests. This concentrated voting power may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control of our company, could deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their capital stock as part of a sale of our company and might ultimately affect the market price of our common stock.

As a board member, Mr. Mattacchione owes a fiduciary duty to our shareholders and must act in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believes to be in the best interests of our shareholders. As a shareholder, Mr. Mattacchione is entitled to vote his shares in his own interest, which may not always be in the interests of our shareholders generally.

Our future success depends on the continuing efforts of our key employees and our ability to attract, hire, retain and motivate highly skilled and creative employees in the future.

Our future success depends on the continuing efforts of our executive officers, our founders and other key employees, in particular Robert Mattacchione, our Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas Bray, our Principal Financial Officer. We rely on the leadership, knowledge and experience that our executive officers, founders and key employees provide. They foster our corporate culture, which we believe has been instrumental to our ability to attract and retain new talent. Any failure to attract new or retain key creative talent could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The market for talent in our key areas of operations is intensely competitive, which could increase our costs to attract and retain talented employees. As a result, we may incur significant costs to attract and retain employees, including significant expenditures related to salaries and benefits and compensation expenses related to equity awards, and we may lose new employees to our competitors or other companies before we realize the benefit of our investment in recruiting and training them.

Employee turnover, including changes in our management team, could disrupt our business. The loss of one or more of our executive officers, founders or other key employees, or our inability to attract and retain highly skilled and creative employees, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We believe our corporate culture has contributed to our success and, if we are unable to maintain it as we grow, our business could be harmed.

We believe our corporate culture has been a key element of our success. However, as our organization grows, it may be difficult to maintain our culture, which could reduce our ability to attract and maintain new talent and operate effectively. The failure to maintain the key aspects of our culture as our organization grows could result in decreased employee satisfaction, increased difficulty in attracting top talent and increased turnover and could compromise the quality of our client service, all of which are important to our success and to the effective execution of our business strategy. Accordingly, if we are unable to maintain our corporate culture as we grow our business, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

We may not have sufficient insurance coverage and an interruption of our business or loss of a significant amount of property could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operations.

We currently do not maintain any insurance policies against loss of key personnel and business interruption as well as product liability claims. If such events were to occur, our business, financial performance and financial position may be materially and adversely affected.

We could become involved in claims or litigations that may result in adverse outcomes.

From time-to-time we may be involved in a variety of claims or litigations. Such proceeding may initially be viewed as immaterial but could prove to be material. Litigations are inherently unpredictable and excessive verdicts do occur. Given the inherent uncertainties in litigation, even when we can reasonably estimate the amount of possible loss or range of loss and reasonably estimable loss contingencies, the actual outcome may change in the future due to new developments or changes in approach. In addition, such claims or litigations could involve significant expense and diversion of management’s attention and resources from other matters.

We may be unable to adequately safeguard our intellectual property or we may face claims that may be costly to resolve or that limit our ability to use such intellectual property in the future.

Where litigation is necessary to safeguard our intellectual property, or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others, this could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results or future prospects.

We are unable to assure you that third parties will not assert infringement claims against us in respect of our intellectual property or that such claims will not be successful. It may be difficult for us to establish or protect our intellectual property against such third parties and we could incur substantial costs and diversion of management resources in defending any claims relating to proprietary rights. If any party succeeds in asserting a claim against us relating to the disputed intellectual property, we may need to obtain licenses to continue to use the same. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain these licenses on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. The failure to obtain the necessary licenses or other rights could cause our business results to suffer.

We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar international anti-bribery and anti-kickback laws with respect to our activities outside the United States.

We anticipate rendering multidisciplinary primary health care services through our clinics and distributing our medical cannabidiol products to locations in Canada and United States as well as operate our business in Canada and United States. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and other similar anti-bribery and anti-kickback laws and regulations, generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in preventing our agents from taking actions in violation of these laws or regulations. Such violations, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We are subject to a number of risks related to credit card and debit card payments we accept.

We accept payments through credit card and debit card transactions. For credit card and debit card payments, we pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time. An increase in those fees would require us to either increase the prices we charge for our services which could cause us to lose clients or suffer an increase in our operating expenses, either of which could harm our operating results. If we or any of our processing vendors have problems with our billing software, or the billing software malfunctions, it could have an adverse effect on our customer satisfaction and could cause one or more of the major credit card companies to disallow our continued use of their payment products. In addition, if our billing software fails to work properly and, as a result, we do not automatically charge our clients’ credit cards, debit cards or bank accounts on a timely basis or at all, we could lose revenues, which would harm our operating results. If we fail to adequately control fraudulent credit card and debit card transactions, we may face civil liability, diminished public perception of our security measures and significantly higher credit card and debit card related costs, each of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The termination of our ability to process payments on any major credit or debit card would significantly impair our ability to operate our business.

Security breaches of confidential customer information, in connection with our electronic processing of credit and debit card transactions, or confidential employee information may adversely affect our business.

Our business requires the collection, transmission and retention of large volumes of customer and employee data, including credit and debit card numbers and other personally identifiable information, in various information technology systems that are maintained internally and by third parties with whom we contract to provide services. The integrity and protection of that customer and employee data is critical to us. Our customers and employees have a high expectation that we and our service providers will adequately protect their personal information. The information, security and privacy requirements imposed by governmental regulation are increasingly demanding. Our systems may not be able to satisfy these changing requirements and customer and employee expectations or may require significant additional investments or time in order to do so. Efforts to hack or breach security measures, failures of systems or software to operate as designed or intended, viruses, operator error or inadvertent releases of data all threaten our information systems and records. A breach in the security of our service providers’ information technology systems could lead to an interruption in the operation of our systems, resulting in operational inefficiencies and a loss of profits. A significant theft, loss or misappropriation of, or access to, customers’ or other proprietary data or other breach of our information technology systems could result in fines, legal claims or proceedings, including regulatory investigations and actions, or liability for failure to comply with privacy and information security laws, which could disrupt our operations, damage our reputation and expose us to claims from customers and employees, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on third parties to provide services in connection with our business, and any failure by these third parties to perform their obligations could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have entered into agreements with third parties that include, but are not limited to, information technology systems (including hosting our website, mobile application and our point of sale system), select marketing services, and employee benefits servicing. Services provided by third-party suppliers could be interrupted as a result of many factors, such as acts of nature or contract disputes. Accordingly, we are subject to the risks associated with the third parties’ abilities to provide these services to meet our needs. Any failure by a third party to provide services for which we have contracted on a timely basis or within expected service level and performance standards could result in a disruption of our business and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our amended and rested articles of incorporation provide that state or federal court located within the state of Nevada will be the sole and exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our shareholders, which could limit its stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees.

Our amended and restated articles of incorporation provide that “[u]nless the Corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Corporation, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of the Corporation to the Corporation or the Corporation’s stockholders, (iii) an action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the NRS, or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, shall be a state or federal court located within the state of Nevada, in all cases subject to the court’s having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants. This exclusive forum provision is intended to apply to claims arising under Nevada state law and would not apply to claims brought pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Securities Act, or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. The exclusive forum provision in our amended and restated articles of incorporation will not relieve us of our duty to comply with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder, and shareholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with these laws, rules and regulations.

Public health epidemics or outbreaks could adversely impact our business.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. While initially the outbreak was largely concentrated in China and caused significant disruptions to its economy, it has now spread to several other countries and infections have been reported globally.

On March 17, 2020, as a result of COVID-19 infections having been reported throughout both Canada and the United States, certain national, provincial, state and local governmental issued proclamations and/or directives aimed at minimizing the spread of COVID-19. Accordingly, on March 17, 2020, the Company closed all corporate clinics for all in-clinic non-essential services to protect the health and safety of its employees, partners and patients. On March 20, 2020, the Company announced the precautionary measures taken as well as announcing the business impact related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

Operating under COVID-19 related governmental proclamations and directives, between March 17, 2020 and June 1, 2020, the Company provided in-clinic multi-disciplinary primary healthcare services and products solely to patients with emergency and essential need while also providing certain virtual based services related to physiotherapy. In light of most eldercare related services being deemed essential by national, provincial and local governmental authorities in Canada, NHL’s contracted eldercare related services have been nominally impacted during the fiscal third quarter and we project the same for the fiscal fourth quarter.

On May 26, 2020, the Ontario Ministry of Health announced updated guidance and directives stating that physiotherapists, chiropractors and other regulated health professionals, including all services and products provided by the Company, can gradually and carefully begin providing all services, including non-essential services, once the clinician and provider are satisfied all necessary precautions and protocols are in place to protect the patients, the clinician and the clinic staff. With all corporate clinics closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, with the exception of providing certain limited essential and emergency services, the Company had furloughed 48 full-time employees and 35 part-time employees from its pre-closure levels of 81 full-time employees and 53 part-time employees.

On June 2, 2020, the Company commenced opening its corporate clinics and providing non-essential services. As of June 9, 2020, the Company had opened all corporate clinics while following all mandated guidelines and protocols from Health Canada, the Ontario Ministry of Health, and the respective disciplines’ regulatory Colleges to ensure a safe treatment environment for our staff and clients. Certain of these guidelines and protocols include both active and passive screening for staff and clients, enhanced cleaning measures using only Health Canada approved disinfectants and sanitizers, personal protective equipment usage, appropriate signage and markers throughout the clinics, and layout changes to the clinics to reflect proper physical distancing measures. Additional, more restrictive proclamations and/or directives may be issued in the future.

With our clinic facilities re-opened and our eldercare contracts operating under COVID-19 pandemic related mandated guidelines and protocols, for the month ended November 30, 2020, NHL’s clinic-based patient flow has met and exceeds 80% for the same period in 2019. In addition, for the month ended November 30, 2020 NHL’s eldercare contract services provided has met and exceeds 92% for the same period in 2019. As of November 30, 2020, the Company has 73 full-time employees and 54 part-time employees.

Based on no additional “lockdowns” or new material directives are implemented limiting the Company’s ability to provide both its clinic and eldercare community related services, for fiscal year 2021 the Company projects a steady month-over-month increase as (i) recommended guidelines for patient-clinician on-site interaction are eased, and (ii) more overall movement restrictions are reduced and people are more comfortable in public spaces.

The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s operations remains unknown and will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak, new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, and any additional preventative and protective actions that governments, or the Company, may direct, which may result in an extended period of continued business disruption, reduced patient traffic and reduced operations. The full long-term financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time but is anticipated to have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The measures taken to date will impact the Company’s fiscal year 2021 business and potentially beyond. Management expects that all of its business segments, across all of its geographies, will be impacted to some degree, but the significance of the full impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the Company’s business and the duration for which it may have an impact cannot be determined at this time.

Risks Related to our Multidisciplinary Primary Health Care Business

We may not be able to successfully implement our business growth initiatives for our multidisciplinary primary health care business on a timely basis or at all, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The growth of our multidisciplinary primary health care business depends on our ability to open and acquire new clinics and expand our roster of clinicians and staff to best service our multidisciplinary primary health care clinics and eldercare centric homes.

A component of our growth strategy is to increase the number of our multidisciplinary primary health care clinics through both the acquisition of existing clinics and the opening of new clinics while also engaging new contracts with new affiliate clinics and elder centric homes. Our ability to acquire and open profitable clinics and expand our clinician and staffing requirements depends on many factors, including our ability to:

●    access capital to fund future acquisitions and preopening expenses;

●    achieve brand awareness in new and existing markets;

●    manage costs, which could give rise to delays or cost overruns;

●    recruit, train, and retain qualified multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians and other staff in our local markets;

●    obtain favorable reimbursement rates for services rendered at the clinics;

●    successfully staff and operate new clinics and affiliated clinics and elder centric homes;

●    obtain all required governmental approvals, certificates, licenses and permits on a timely basis;

●    manage delays in the acquisition or opening of clinics;

●    compete for appropriate sites in new markets against other multidisciplinary primary health care competitors and clinics; and

●    maintain adequate information systems and other operational system capabilities.

Further, additional federal or state legislative or regulatory restrictions or licensure requirements could negatively impact our ability to operate both new and existing clinics.

Accordingly, we may not be able to achieve our planned growth or, even if we are able to grow our clinic base as planned, any new clinics may not be profitable or otherwise perform as planned. Failure to implement successfully our growth strategy would likely have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

The long-term success of our multidisciplinary primary health care business is highly dependent on our ability to successfully identify and acquire target clinics and identify and secure staffing opportunities.

To achieve our business growth initiative, we will need to acquire and open new clinics and operate them on a profitable basis. We expect this to be the case for the foreseeable future. In addition, we will need to identify and secure staffing opportunities as well. We consider numerous factors in identifying target markets where we can enter or expand and staffing opportunities that we can secure.

The number and timing of new clinics acquired and opened during any given period may be negatively impacted by a number of factors including, without limitation:

●       the identification and availability of attractive sites for new clinics and the ability to negotiate suitable lease terms;

●       our ability to successfully identify and address pertinent risks during acquisition due diligence;

●       the preparation of target clinics’ financial statements on methods of accounting other than generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”);

●       the proximity of potential sites to one of our or our competitors’ existing clinics;

●       our ability to obtain required governmental licenses, permits and authorizations on a timely basis; and

●       our ability to recruit qualified clinicians and other personnel to staff our clinics.

If we are unable to find and secure attractive target clinics to expand in existing markets or enter new markets, our revenues and profitability may be harmed, we may not be able to implement our business growth initiatives and our financial results may be negatively affected.

Our intended acquisition and opening of clinics and increase in staffing in new markets exposes us to various risks and may require us to develop new business models.

Our growth and profitability depend on our ability to implement our business growth initiatives by expanding the number of clinics we operate and the amount of staffing in both new and existing markets. We cannot assure you our efforts to expand into new markets, particularly where we do not currently operate, will succeed. To operate in new markets, we may be required to modify our existing business model and cost structure to comply with local regulatory or other requirements, which may expose us to new operational, regulatory or legal risks.

We may be unable to acquire target clinics within our current price ranges. This may reduce the pace of our growth and increase the need for additional debt and equity capital. The patient population of clinics we acquire may be loyal to existing ownership, making it difficult to maintain pre-closing revenue and profit levels. The re-branding of acquired clinics may have an adverse market effect in local communities, and our brand may not be received as favorably in the local communities as we anticipate.

The process of integration of an acquired clinic may subject us to a number of risks, including:

●       Failure to successfully manage relationships with multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians and other staff of the acquired clinic;

●       Demands on management related to the increase in size of our Company after the acquisition;

●       Diversion of management attention;

●       Potential difficulties integrating and harmonizing financial reporting systems;

●       Difficulties in the assimilation and retention of employees;

●       Inability to retain the multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians and other staff of the acquired clinic;

●       Inability to establish uniform standards, controls, systems, procedures and policies;

●       Inability to retain the patients of the acquired clinic;

●       Exposure to legal claims for activities of the acquired clinic prior to acquisition; and

●       Incurrence of additional expenses in connection with the integration process.

If the acquired clinic is not successfully integrated into our Company, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected, as well as our reputation. Furthermore, if we are unable to successfully integrate the acquired clinic or if there are delays in combining the businesses, the anticipated benefits of the acquisition may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.

Growing our business through acquisitions will require additional personnel. There can be no assurance that these demands will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, nor can there be any assurance that we will be able to attract or retain competent personnel and improve our operational systems sufficiently to support the expansion of our operations.

Also important to our success will be our ability to achieve additional economies of scale in order to improve operating margins. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve such economies of scale, and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Clinics we open in new markets may take longer to reach expected revenue and profit levels on a consistent basis. The cost of opening and operating new clinics may exceed our budget, thereby affecting our overall profitability. New markets may have competitive conditions, consumer preferences, and health care spending patterns that are more difficult to predict, identify or satisfy than our existing markets. We may need to make greater investments than we originally planned in advertising and promotional activity in new markets and after closing acquisitions to build brand awareness. We may find it more difficult in new markets to hire, and we may not be able to retain and motivate qualified multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians and other personnel. We may need to augment our labor model to meet regulatory requirements and the overall cost of labor may increase or be higher than anticipated.

As a result, any new or acquired clinics may be less successful and may not achieve target profit margins at the same rate or at all. If any steps taken to expand our existing business model into new markets are unsuccessful, we may not be able to achieve our growth objectives and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

We will require additional capital to fund our operating and expansion costs, and our inability to obtain such capital will likely harm our business.

Although we currently operate 16 corporate owned multidisciplinary primary health care clinics, our administrative, corporate and general organizational infrastructure is designed to support numerous additional clinics. Consequently, we expect that our monthly expenses will continue to exceed our monthly cash receipts until we significantly increase the number of our multidisciplinary primary health care clinics. Depending on the results of our operations, we may need to raise additional capital to cover our operating and expansion costs.

To support our expansion strategy, we must have sufficient capital to continue making investments in new and existing clinics. Current funding sources and cash generated by our operations may not be sufficient to allow us to sustain our expansion efforts. If this is the case, we may need additional equity or debt financing to provide the funds required to operate and expand our business. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms or at all, we may be unable to expand our business or acquire new clinics at our projected rate and our operating results may suffer. Debt financing increases expenses and must be repaid regardless of operating results and may impose restrictions on the manner in which we operate our business. Equity financing, or debt financing that is convertible into equity, could result in additional dilution to our existing stockholders. Furthermore, if we are unable to obtain adequate capital, whether in the form of equity or debt, to fund our business and growth strategies we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all of our expansion plans, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition, or prospects.

The clinics that we intend to acquire or open may not meet our expectations.

In general, our business growth initiatives involve the acquisition and opening of strategically located clinics. Clinics that we intend to acquire and open may not meet our revenue or profit targets or may take longer than anticipated to do so. If our acquired or new clinics do not perform as planned, our business and future prospects could be harmed. If we are unable to manage successfully the potential difficulties associated with acquiring and opening new clinics, we may not be able to capture the efficiencies and opportunities that we expect from our expansion strategy. Our inability to capture expected efficiencies of scale, maintain patient volumes, improve our systems and equipment, continue our cost discipline, and retain appropriate physician and overall labor levels, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we open new clinics in existing markets, revenue at our existing clinics may be affected negatively.

The catchment area of our clinics varies by location and depends on a number of factors, including population density, other available convenient medical or multidimensional primary health care services, area demographics and geography. As a result, the opening of a new clinic in or near markets in which we already have clinics could adversely affect the revenues of those existing clinics. Existing clinics could also make it more difficult to build our patient base for a new clinic in the same market. We may selectively open new clinics in and around areas of existing clinics that are operating at or near capacity to serve effectively our patients, but revenue cannibalization between our clinics may become significant in the future as competition increases and as we continue to expand our operations. This could adversely affect our revenue growth, which could, in turn, adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

We may be required to make capital expenditures in connection with our acquisitions to implement our growth strategy.

In order to maintain brand consistency across our multidimensional primary health care clinics, we may need to make significant capital expenditures to the interior and exterior of our clinics. This may include making real property improvements and upgrading our medical equipment to serve our patients and remain competitive. Changing competitive conditions or the emergence of significant advances in medical technology could require us to invest significant capital in additional equipment or capacity in order to remain competitive. Along these lines, if the systems and technology of our target clinics differ from those we have chosen to utilize, we may be required to invest significant capital to either convert, terminate, or integrate the varying medical technology platforms. If we are unable to fund any such investment or otherwise fail to make necessary capital expenditures, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Damage to our reputation or our brand in existing or new markets could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We must grow the value of our brand to be successful. We intend to further develop our reputation and brand of providing patients with high quality effective multidisciplinary primary health care services, and related products, delivered by respected clinicians and well-trained operational staff. Additionally, we place high-value on building and maintaining a patient-centered culture. If we do not make investments in areas such as marketing and advertising, as well as the day-to-day investments required for clinic operations, equipment upgrades, and personnel training, the value of our brand may not increase or may be diminished. Any incident, real or perceived, regardless of merit or outcome, that adversely affects our brand, such as, but not limited to, patient disability or death due to malpractice or allegations of malpractice, failure to comply with federal, provincial or local regulations, including allegations or perceptions of non-compliance or failure to comply with ethical and operational standards, could significantly reduce the value of our brand, expose us to negative publicity and damage our overall business and reputation.

Our marketing activities may not be successful.

We incur costs and expend other resources in our marketing efforts to attract and retain patients. Our marketing activities are principally focused on increasing brand awareness in the communities in which we provide services. As we open and acquire new clinics, we expect to undertake aggressive marketing campaigns to increase community awareness about our presence and our service capabilities. We plan to conduct our targeted marketing efforts in neighborhoods through channels such as direct mail, billboards, radio advertisements, physician open houses, community sponsorships and various social media. If we are not successful in these efforts, we will have incurred expenses without materially increasing revenue.

The multidisciplinary primary health care market is highly competitive, including competition for patients, strategic relationships, and commercial payor contracts, each of which could adversely affect our contract and revenue base.

The market for providing multidisciplinary primary health care services, and related products, is highly competitive, and all of our clinics and staffing opportunities face and will face competition, in varying degrees, from existing multidisciplinary primary health care providers. walk-in clinics, hospital emergency rooms, private doctors’ offices, freestanding emergency clinics, independent laboratories, hospital- and payor-supported urgent care facilities, and occupational medicine clinics. We compete with national, regional, and local enterprises, some of which have greater financial and other resources available to them, greater access to clinicians, medically licensed physicians and other medical professionals or greater access to potential patients. Our clinics and staffing compete on the basis of accessibility, including evening and weekend hours, walk-in care, as well as varying appointment opportunities. We also compete on the basis of our multi-provinces, regional footprint, which we believe will be of value to both employers and third-party payors. As a result of the differing competitive factors within the markets in which we operate and will operate, the individual results of our clinics may be volatile. If we are unable to compete effectively with any of these entities or groups, we may be unable to implement our business strategies successfully, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to recruit and retain qualified multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians for our multidisciplinary primary health care clinics and staffing of affiliate clinics and eldercare centric homes.

Our success depends upon our ability to recruit and retain qualified multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians and other staff. There is currently a national shortage in Canada and United States of certain of these health care professionals. To the extent a significant number of multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians within an individual community or market decide to partner with competing multidisciplinary primary health care providers or hospitals and not with us, we may not be able to operate our clinics in such community. We face competition for such personnel from existing operators, hospital systems, entrepreneurial start-ups, and other organizations. This competition may require us to enhance wages and benefits to recruit and retain qualified personnel. Our inability to recruit and retain these professionals could have a material adverse effect on our ability to grow or be profitable.

We may not be able to prohibit or limit our multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians from competing with us in our local markets.

In certain provinces in Canada in which we operate or intend to operate and states in the United States in which we intend to operate, non-compete, non-solicitation, and other negative covenants applicable to employment or ownership are judicially or statutorily limited in their effectiveness or are entirely unenforceable against multidisciplinary primary health care professionals. As a result, we may not be able to protect our operational processes, procedures, and general trade secrets or limit insiders from using competitive information against us or competing with us, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to remain competitive.

With respect to our operations in Canada, we may be unable to enter into or maintain contracts for our affiliate multidisciplinary primary health care clinics and eldercare focused facilities or services on favorable terms with commercial payors.

In Canada, a significant portion of our net patient service revenue is derived from nongovernmental, extended health insurers which provide reimbursement based on a pre-allocated amount disbursed as a cash payment for services, and related products, provided to the patient.

With respect to our anticipated expansion of our operations into the United States, we may be unable to enter into or maintain contracts for our multidisciplinary primary health care clinics and services on favorable terms with commercial payors in the United States.

With respect to our anticipated expansion of our operations into the United States, we anticipate that a significant portion of our net patient service revenue will be derived from nongovernmental, third-party payors, or commercial payors, such as managed care organizations, commercial insurance providers and employer-sponsored health care plans. These commercial payors use a variety of methods for reimbursement depending on the arrangement involved. These arrangements include fee-for-service, PPOs and health maintenance organizations, as well as prepaid and discounted medical service packages and capitated, or fixed fee, contracts. Rates for health maintenance organization benefit plans are typically lower than those for PPOs or other benefit plans that offer broader provider access.

Frequently, commercial payors classify or may reclassify our multidisciplinary primary health care services differently. Such distinctions may result in different payment and reimbursement structure. Such differences may affect costs to the patient through increased copayments, deductibles and other cost-sharing mechanisms and, accordingly, patient choice of provider.

There is often pressure to renegotiate reimbursement levels, particularly in connection with changes to Medicare. Typically, commercial payors reimburse us based upon contracted discounts to our established base rates. If managed care organizations and other commercial payors reduce their rates or we were to experience a significant shift in our revenue mix toward Medicare or Medicaid reimbursements, then our revenue and profitability would be adversely affected and our operating margins would be reduced. Commercial payors often demand discounted fee structures, and the trend toward consolidation among commercial payors tends to increase their bargaining power over fee structures. Because some commercial payors rely on all or portions of Medicare fee schedules to determine payment rates, changes to government health care programs that reduce payments under these schedules may negatively impact payments from commercial payors. Other health care providers may impact our ability to negotiate increases and other favorable terms in our reimbursement arrangements with commercial payors. For example, some of our competitors may negotiate exclusivity provisions with commercial payors or otherwise restrict the ability of commercial payors to contract with us. We may be excluded from participating in commercial payor networks, making it more expensive for certain patients to receive treatment at our clinics. Our results of operations will depend, in part, on our ability to retain and renew managed care contracts as well as enter into new managed care contracts on terms favorable to us. Our inability to maintain suitable financial arrangements with commercial payors could have a material adverse impact on our business.

As various provisions of the ACA are implemented, commercial payors may increasingly demand fee reductions. In addition, there is a growing trend for commercial payors to take steps to shift the primary cost of care to the plan participant by increasing co-payments, co-insurance and deductibles, and these actions could discourage such patients from seeking treatment at our clinics. Patient volumes could be negatively impacted if we are unable to enter into or maintain acceptable contracts with such commercial payors, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Government health care programs may reduce reimbursement rates.

Our competition will also be the Canadian health care system which is a government sponsored system that began in 1957, when Parliament approved the Hospital Insurance and Diagnostics Services Act. The Act provided free acute hospital care, laboratory and radiological diagnostic services to Canadians. By 1961, agreements were in place with all the provinces and 99% of Canadians had free access to the health care services covered by the legislation. The Act was followed by the Medical Care Act of 1966 that provided free access to physician services. By 1972, each province had established its own system of free access to physician services. The federal government shared in the funding. In 1984, the Government of Canada passed the Canada Health Act (CHA). The Canada Health Act created a publicly administered health care system that is comprehensive, universal and accessible. All medically necessary procedures are provided free of charge. The system provides diagnostic, treatment and preventive services regardless of income level or station in life. Access to care is not based on health status or ability to pay. Coverage is portable between provinces and territories. We can give no assurance that we will be able to effectively compete in this market.

In recent years, in the United States, new legislation has been proposed and adopted at both the federal and state level that is effecting major changes in the health care system. Any change in the laws, regulations, or policies governing the health care system could adversely affect reimbursement rates and our operations and financial condition. Enacted in March 2010, the ACA seeks to expand health care coverage, while increasing quality and limiting costs. The ACA substantially changes the way health care is financed by both governmental and commercial payors. As a result of the ACA or the adoption of additional federal and state health care reforms measures there could be limits to the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for health care services, which could result in reduced demand or profitability of our services.

Furthermore, if due to an allegation of fraud or any other reason one or more of our multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians or practitioners is no longer entitled to bill and receive payment for services rendered to patients whose treatment is paid in whole or in part by a governmental payor, our revenue may be negatively impacted, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

If payments from commercial or governmental payors are significantly delayed, are reduced or eliminated, our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We depend upon compensation from third-party payors for the services provided to patients by our multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians and practitioners in our clinics, affiliate clinics and eldercare centric homes serviced by our clinicians. The amount that we receive through our clinics in payment for their services may be adversely affected by factors we do not control, including federal, provincial or local regulatory changes, cost-containment decisions and changes in reimbursement schedules of third-party payors and legislative changes. Any reduction or elimination of these payments could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Additionally, the reimbursement process is complex and can involve lengthy delays. Although we recognize revenue when multidisciplinary primary health care services are provided, there can be delays before we receive payment. In addition, third-party payors may disallow, in whole or in part, requests for reimbursement based on determinations that certain amounts are not reimbursable under plan coverage, that services provided were not medically necessary, or that additional supporting documentation is necessary. Retroactive adjustments by third-party payors may be difficult or cost prohibitive to appeal, and such changes could materially reduce the actual amount we receive from those payors. Delays and uncertainties in the reimbursement process may be out of our control and may adversely affect us.

Significant changes in our payor mix resulting from fluctuations in the types of patients seen at our clinics could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Our results may change from period to period due to fluctuations in payor mix or other factors relating to the type of treatment performed by clinicians at our clinics. Payor mix refers to the relative amounts we receive from the mix of persons or entities that pay or reimburse us for health care services. Because we generally receive relatively higher payment rates from commercial payors than from governmental payors or self-pay patients, a significant shift in our payor mix toward a higher percentage of self-pay or patients whose treatment is paid in whole or part by a governmental payor, which could occur for reasons beyond our control, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Failure to bill timely or accurately for our services could have a negative impact on our net revenues, bad debt expense and cash flow.

Billing for our services is often complex and time consuming. The practice of providing multidisciplinary primary health care services, and related products, in advance of payment or prior to assessing a patient’s ability to pay for such services may have a significant negative impact on our patient service revenue, bad debt expense and cash flow. We bill numerous and varied payors, including self-pay patients, various forms of commercial payors, government payors and insurance payors. Billing requirements that must be met prior to receiving payment for services rendered often vary by payor. Self-pay patients and third-party payors may fail to pay for services even if they have been properly billed. Reimbursement is typically dependent on our providing the proper procedure and diagnosis codes.

Additional factors that could affect our collections for the services we render include:

●       disputes among payors as to which party is responsible for payment;

●       variations in coverage among various payors for similar services;

●       the difficulty of adherence to specific compliance requirements, coding and various other procedures mandated by responsible parties;

●       the institution of new coding standards; and

●       failure to properly credential our providers to enable them to bill various payors.

The complexity associated with billing for our services causes many delays in our cash collections, resulting in increased carrying costs associated with the aging of our accounts receivable as well as the increased potential for bad debt expense.

We are dependent on our third-party revenue cycle managers for billing and collection of our claims.

We submit our claims for services rendered to commercial payors and governmental payors electronically through our third-party revenue cycle managers. We are dependent on our revenue cycle managers for the timely billing and collections of our claims. Any delay by or failure of our revenue cycle managers to timely bill and collect our claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may incur costs resulting from security risks in connection with the electronic data processing by our partner banks.

Because we accept electronic payment cards for payments at our facilities, we may incur costs resulting from related security risks in connection with the electronic processing of confidential information by our partner banks. Recently, several of the large national banks have experienced potential or actual breaches in which similar data has been or may have been stolen. Such occurrences could cause patient dissatisfaction resulting in decreased visits or could also distract our management team from the management of the day-to-day operations.

With respect to our Canadian operations and our anticipated expansion of our operations into the United States, a successful challenge by tax authorities to our treatment of certain multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians and practitioners as independent contractors or the elimination of an existing safe harbor could materially increase our costs relating to these multidimensional primary health care clinicians and practitioners.

With respect to our Canadian operations and our anticipated expansion of our operations into the United States, certain of our multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians and practitioners may be engaged as independent contractors by our state-level operating subsidiaries. If these personnel are treated as independent contractors rather than as employees, our state-level operating subsidiaries will not (i) withhold federal, state or local or state income or other employment related taxes from their compensation, (ii) make federal, provincial, state or local federal or state unemployment tax or Federal Insurance Contributions Act payments with respect to them, (iii) provide workers compensation insurance with respect to them (except in states where they are required to do so for independent contractors), or (iv) allow them to participate in benefits and retirement programs available to employees. Although we will have contracts with these licensed multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians obligating them to pay these taxes and other costs, if a challenge to our treatment of these licensed multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians and practitioners as independent contractors by federal, state or local authorities were successful and they were treated as employees instead of independent contractors, we could be liable for taxes, penalties and interest. In addition, there are currently, and have been in the past, proposals made to eliminate an existing safe harbor that would potentially protect us from the imposition of taxes in these circumstances, and similar proposals could be made in the future. If such a challenge were successful or if the safe harbor were eliminated, this could cause a material increase in our costs relating to these personnel and, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Currently, our corporate owned clinics and affiliate clinics are located in the Canadian provinces of Ontario, Alberta, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland making us particularly sensitive to regulatory, economic, and other conditions in those states.

Our clinics and affiliate clinics are located in the Canadian provinces of Ontario, Alberta, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. If there were an adverse regulatory, economic or other development in any of those states, our patient volume could decline, our ability to operate our clinics under our existing business model could be impacted, or there could be other unanticipated adverse impacts on our business that could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition.

Our business is seasonal, which impacts our results of operations.

Our clinics’ patient and staffing volumes are sensitive to seasonal fluctuations. Typically, winter months see a higher occurrence of motor vehicle and winter weather related accidents, such as falling, however; the timing and severity of these can vary dramatically. Additionally, in the United States as consumers shift toward high deductible insurance plans, they are responsible for a greater percentage of their bill, particularly in the early months of the year before other health care spending has occurred, which may lead to lower than expected patient volume or an increase in bad debt expense during that period. Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future depending on these and other factors.

We could be subject to lawsuits for which we are not fully insured.

Medical professionals, including multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians and practitioners, have become subject to an increasing number of lawsuits alleging medical malpractice and related legal theories such as negligent hiring, supervision and credentialing. In Canada, our clinicians and practitioners, whether an employee or independent contractor, are responsible for their own professional liability insurance coverage. As provided in Canadian rules and regulations, our liability insurance coverage is not required to cover our clinicians and practitioners. As we expand in the United States, we anticipate procuring insurance coverage for our affiliated multidimensional primary health care clinicians, practitioners and corporate entities. In addition, as we expand our menu of services and related products through our various Medical Technology Platforms or possible acquisition of a medical licensed primary care practice, we will be subject to lawsuits alleging medical malpractice and related legal theories such as negligent hiring, supervision and credentialing.

We are currently insured under policies in amounts management deems appropriate, based upon the nature and risk of our business. Nevertheless, there are exclusions and exceptions to coverage under each insurance policy that may make coverage for any claim unavailable, future claims could exceed the limits of available insurance coverage, existing insurers could become insolvent and fail to meet their obligations to provide coverage for such claims, and such coverage may not always be available with sufficient limits and at reasonable cost to insure us adequately and economically in the future. One or more successful claims against us not covered by, or exceeding the coverage of, our insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, in the normal course of our business, we may be involved in other types of lawsuits, claims, audits and investigations, including those arising out of our billing and marketing practices, employment disputes, contractual claims and other business disputes for which we may have no insurance coverage. The outcome of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

Some of these lawsuits involve large claim amounts and substantial defense costs.

Insurance coverage for some of our losses may be inadequate and may be subject to the credit risk of commercial insurance providers.

We maintain insurance coverage for specific liability for our clinic facilities through various third-party insurers. To the extent we hold policies to cover certain groups of claims or rely on insurance coverage obtained by third parties to cover such claims, we may be responsible for those losses if the insurance coverage is inadequate or the insurer rejects our claim for payment. Furthermore, for our losses that are insured or reinsured through commercial insurance providers, we are subject to the financial viability of those insurance companies. Although we believe our commercial insurance providers are currently creditworthy, they may not remain so in the future.

Risks Related to Health Care Regulation

The health care industry is heavily regulated, and if we fail to comply with these laws and government regulations, we could incur penalties or be required to make significant changes to our operations.

The health care industry is heavily regulated and closely scrutinized by federal, state, provincial and local governments. Comprehensive statutes and regulations govern the manner in which we provide and bill for services and products, our contractual relationships with our clinicians, vendors, patients and our marketing activities and other aspects of our operations. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could be exposed to civil and criminal penalties such as fines, damages, overpayment recoupment, loss of enrollment status and exclusion from government health care programs. Any action against us for violation of these laws or regulations, even if successfully defended, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business. Our clinicians and practitioners are also subject to ethical guidelines and operating standards of professional and private accreditation agencies.

The laws, regulations and standards governing the provision of health care service, and related products, may change significantly in the future, and these changes may materially and adversely affect our business. Furthermore, a review of our business by regulatory or accreditation authorities could result in determinations that could adversely affect our operations.

Our Canadian clinics are and will be subject to numerous statutes and regulations. Additionally, given our intention to expand and begin operations in the United States, we will be subject to numerous U.S. statutes and regulations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in civil or criminal sanctions.

The operation of our clinics in Canada subjects us, and will subject us, to many provincial laws and regulations, following the projected expansion of our Company’s operations to the United States, federal and state laws in the United States. In general, whether directly or through boards, agencies or other delegated authorities, regulating the ownership and dispensing of controlled substances, the retention and storage of medical records, patient privacy and protection of health information, the licensure of multidisciplinary primary health care providers, including clinicians, and the clinical supervision, by physicians, of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, among other aspects of our operations are regulated. All such laws and regulations, and the applicable interpretations of such laws and regulations, are subject to change.

Additional regulation of clinics such as ours has been proposed in several Canadian provinces and the United States. The adoption of any such regulations in the provinces in Canada, or states in the United States in which we operate or intend to operate, could force us to change our operational or transactional approach or lead to a finding by regulators that our primary care clinics and clinics do not meet legal requirements. We may be subject to criminal prosecution, regulatory fines, penalties or other sanctions if our operations or clinics are found to not comply with applicable laws and regulations. In addition, we may be required to refund all funds received from patients and third-party payors during the period of noncompliance.

With respect to our anticipated expansion of our operations into the United States, state regulation of the expansion of multidisciplinary primary health care clinics could prevent us from reaching our expansion objectives.

In the United States, many states have certificate of need programs that require some level of prior approval for the development, acquisition or expansion of health care sector related facilities. With respect to our anticipated expansion of our operations into the United States, in the event we choose to acquire or open clinics in a state that does require such approval, we may be required to obtain a certificate of need before the acquisition or opening occurs. If we are unable to obtain such approvals, we may not be able to move forward with the planned activity.

Only a few states currently require the licensure of multidisciplinary primary health care clinics such as ours. The lack of a specific licensure process for our clinics in the vast majority of states may lead state legislators or regulators to regulate aggressively the growth of our industry, potentially seeking to treat our industry in a manner similar to hospitals or freestanding emergency departments. Further, the growing number of urgent care clinics and freestanding emergency departments may lead to legislation or regulations requiring us to change substantially our operations or cease our operations in that state entirely. Any such requirements could have a material adverse effect on our prospects and growth strategy.

Our services, and related products, are subject to comprehensive laws and regulations that govern the manner in which we bill and are paid for our services by third-party payors, and the failure to comply with these requirements can result in civil or criminal sanctions, including exclusion from federal and state health care programs.

A substantial portion of our services, and related products, are paid for by commercial payors and governmental payors. These third-party payors typically have differing and complex billing and documentation requirements. If we fail to meet these requirements, we may not be paid for our services or payment may be substantially delayed or reduced.

Numerous federal, provincial and local laws also apply to our claims for payment, including but not limited to (i) “coordination of benefits” rules that dictate which payor must be billed first when a patient has coverage from multiple payors, (ii) requirements that overpayments be refunded within a specified period of time, (iii) “reassignment” rules governing the ability to bill and collect professional fees on behalf of other providers, (iv) requirements that electronic claims for payment be submitted using certain standardized transaction codes and formats, and (v) laws requiring all health and financial information of patients in a manner that complies with applicable security and privacy standards.

Third-party payors carefully monitor compliance with these and other applicable rules. Our failure to comply with these rules could result in our obligation to refund amounts previously paid for such services or non-payment for our services.

If we are found to have violated any of these or any of the other laws or regulations which govern our activities, the resulting penalties, damages, fines or other sanctions could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results.

Changes in coverage and the rates or methods of third-party reimbursements may adversely affect our revenue and operations.

A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from direct billings to patients and third-party payors. As a result, any changes in the rates or methods of reimbursement for the services and products we provide could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and financial results. Reimbursement rates can vary depending on whether our clinic is an in-network or out-of-network provider. Each of our clinics may be out-of-network for some patients. When acting as an out-of-network provider, reimbursement rates may be lower, co-payments and deductibles may be higher and we may have difficulties complying with the billing requirements of certain third-party payors.

Past and future legislation related to the health care industry and other changes in the health care industry could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The health care industry is subject to legislative and regulatory changes, as well as changes from other influences. The government may continue reviewing and assessing health care delivery and payment systems and may in the future adopt legislation making additional fundamental changes in the health care system. There is no assurance that such changes will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Continued efforts to shift health care costs to the patient (through co-payments, deductibles, and other mechanisms) could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to the Canada Health Act, Canada’s National Health Insurance Program and Food and Drugs Act and analogous provisions of applicable state laws and could face substantial penalties if we fail to comply with such laws.

In Canada, some health care services are public, some are private with a number of different entities involved in regulating and providing their delivery. While there is a perception that all health care in Canada is publicly funded, the publicly funded system is generally restricted to “medically necessary” hospital and physician services, and provincial or territorial drug plans that provide access to prescription drugs to residents over the age of 65 or those residents who rely on social assistance programs. Publicly funded services are delivered through a combination of public and private providers and funding comes from the Canadian federal government, which sets national standards, and the provincial and territorial governments, which regulates the delivery of services and determines those services that are deemed “medically necessary” (i.e., publicly funded) within the context of their own unique fiscal and political environment. In addition, there are a wide array of health products and services that are not subject to coverage under the public health insurance plans that are provided on a private payer basis.

Federal/Provincial Government Division of Power in Canada

As is the case for many important industries and economic sectors, neither the federal, nor the provincial/territorial level of government has exclusive jurisdiction over health. Instead, the Constitution Act, 1867, divides the legislative powers relevant to the regulation of the delivery of health products and services between the federal and provincial levels of government.

The federal government is responsible for regulating important aspects of various health industries or sectors including the regulation of selling, importing, distributing and marketing drugs and medical devices and it maintains significant influence over health policy and national objectives through the use of its spending power.

The provincial/territorial level of government has comprehensive authority over the delivery of health care services. Other examples of provincial responsibility include the regulation of hospitals and other health facilities, administration of health insurance plans, distribution of prescription drugs and regulation of health professionals.

However, many health industry sectors are subject to at least some degree of regulation or oversight by both levels of government.

Canada’s National Health Insurance Program

Canada’s “national” health insurance program, a publicly funded single-payer system often referred to as “Medicare,” is designed to ensure that all Canadian residents have universal access to medically necessary hospital and physician services through the provincial and territorial health care insurance plans.

The Canada Health Act

The Canada Health Act is the federal legislation that provides the foundation for the Canadian health care system. The Act is administered by Health Canada, the federal department with primary responsibility for maintaining and improving the health of Canadians. However, neither the Canada Health Act nor Health Canada have direct authority to regulate the health insurance plans that give effect to the publicly funded health insurance system that is in place across the country. Instead, the Act establishes certain values and principles and sets out criteria and conditions that each publicly funded health insurance plan is required to meet in order to qualify for federal funding through the Canada Health Transfer. As federal funding is critical to the ability to fund “medically necessary” hospital and physician services, each provincial and territorial health insurance plan must satisfy the requirements of public administration; universality; portability; comprehensiveness; and accessibility.

Notably, these requirements relate only to funding and administration and establishing broad principles rather than a prescriptive code. In addition, the Canada Health Act is silent with respect to the delivery of health services and does not prohibit or discourage the delivery of insured health services by the private sector. As a result, there is significant variation in the funding and administration of health insurance plans from one jurisdiction to another. However, most provinces permit the delivery of a broad range of publicly funded health services through a combination of both public and private providers. Indeed, many publicly funded services in Canada are privately delivered.

The requirement that publicly funded health insurance plans be comprehensive requires that “medically necessary” hospital and physician services be covered. If a service is determined to be “medically necessary” then the full cost of the service must be covered by the public plan. However, the term is not defined and the services that must be covered are intentionally and broadly defined in order to accommodate the ability of each province and territory to make its own coverage decisions within the context of its unique fiscal and political environment. Typically, such decisions are made in consultation with the relevant medical associations in the jurisdiction. However, determining whether a particular service is “medical necessary” is a determination that has both a fiscal and political dimension. Ultimately, these coverage decisions are decisions about the allocation of scarce public resources.

The products and services available to Canadians through the publicly funded health insurance system are supplemented by a wide array of health products and services that are not, as a general matter, subject to coverage under the public health insurance plans. For example, prescription drug coverage, dental services and vision care are generally provided on a private payer basis. However, many jurisdictions provide coverage for these types of services to seniors and those who face financial or other barriers to privately funded health care. There are also a growing number of providers that offer ancillary healthcare services. Examples include elective surgical or cosmetic procedures.

Regulation of Health Professionals and Health Facilities

Health professionals and health care facilities are subject to federal laws of general application, but the regulation of such matters is largely a matter of provincial jurisdiction.

Health Professionals

Through legislation, the provinces have delegated the regulation of health professionals to self-governing professional bodies (with varying degrees of discretion). Such legislation generally seeks to protect the public through a combination of “input regulations” that focus on who is entitled to provide a particular health service and “output regulations” that focus on the quality and delivery of the service being provided. Such regulations also generally include conflict of interest (or anti-kickback) provisions, as such matters are generally dealt with as part of the regulation of health professions rather than the regulation of health facilities.

Health industry participants that offer a particular service need to understand how the service is regulated. If the service involves the performance of a regulated or controlled act (i.e., acts that can only be performed by a particular category or categories of regulated health professionals or their delegates) then the involvement of one or more duly qualified health professionals will likely be required. Also, it may be necessary to implement certain protocols and procedures in order to comply with the requirements of the regulatory colleges that govern the practices of any such professionals. Complying with such requirements can have significant commercial implications.

Health Facilities

Operating a regulated health facility can be challenging and often involves a degree of regulatory risk.

Residential health care facilities other than hospitals, such as nursing homes, long-term care facilities, pharmacies, laboratories and specimen collection clinics are, in most jurisdictions, privately owned and operated pursuant to provincial licenses and oversight. However, the degree to which such health facilities and other providers are regulated generally depends on the nature of the products and services being provided.

The operation of health facilities by private sector entities still typically involves some element of reimbursement through public funds. Where public funds are being used to acquire goods and services, additional accountability measures such as procurement requirements often apply.

Regulation of Drugs

The process of obtaining marketing authorizations and approvals of prescription drugs is administered by Health Canada’s Therapeutic Products Directorate (TPD).

The TPD applies the Food and Drugs Act and the regulations applicable to prescription drugs to ensure that drug products sold in Canada are safe and effective. No drug product can be offered for sale in Canada unless and until, after review, it is issued a marketing authorization by Health Canada.

In addition to its review of drug products, Health Canada is responsible for the ongoing monitoring of drug products being sold in Canada, as well as the regulation of good manufacturing practices and establishment licenses, which are required in connection with the import, manufacture, distribution and/or sale of drug products.

The Patented Medicines Prices Review Board

The Patented Medicines Prices Review Board (PMPRB) is an independent quasi-judicial body created in 1987 under amendments to the Patent Act. The PMPRB is responsible for regulating the prices that patentees charge for prescription and non-prescription patented drugs sold in Canada. Based on a review of the information required to be filed by a patentee, the PMPRB considers whether the price of a medicine appears excessive based on certain factors including: (i) the prices that the patented medicine is sold in the Canadian market; (ii) the prices at which other medicines in the same therapeutic class are sold in the Canadian market; and (iii) the prices at which the medicine and other medicines in the same therapeutic class have been sold in other countries other than Canada. If the PMPRB considers the price of a medicine appears excessive, revised pricing is the usual outcome.

Public Market Access

Each province has a provincial drug plan that allows certain individuals to access drugs at a reduced cost. Products that will be paid for by the provincial government (in some provinces, for all residents, while in others for certain prescribed individuals such as seniors and individuals receiving social assistance), are typically listed on provincial formularies. For innovator products, the manufacturer negotiates the pricing for inclusion on the provincial formulary with the provincial government. For generic products, the price to be paid for the generic product is determined by a sliding scale of fixed prices related to when such products enter the market and the price of the innovator product (i.e., a percent of the price of the innovator pharmaceutical product depending on whether they are first, second or third entry products). If a drug is a generic product and listed as interchangeable on the provincial formulary, a pharmacist is permitted to dispense the interchangeable product for the innovator product. Under most provincial benefit plans, interchanging a generic product for the innovator product by pharmacists is mandatory and generally most provinces will only reimburse the pharmacist for the lowest cost interchangeable product. Government drug plans account for approximately 50% of all sales of prescription drugs in Canada.

The scope and enforcement of each of these laws is uncertain and subject to constant change. Federal and provincial enforcement entities have significantly increased their scrutiny of health care companies and providers which has led to investigations, prosecutions, convictions and large settlements. Although we conduct our business in compliance with all applicable federal and provincial fraud and abuse laws, many of these laws are broadly worded and may be interpreted or applied in ways that cannot be predicted with any certainty. Therefore, we cannot assure you that our arrangements or business practices will not be subject to government scrutiny or will be found to be in compliance with applicable fraud and abuse laws. Further, responding to investigations can be time consuming and result in significant legal fees and can potentially divert management’s attention from the Company.

We are subject to the data privacy and security laws of Canada, and the failure to comply with these rules, or allegations that we have failed to do so, could result in civil or criminal sanctions.

In Canada, under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and under various provincial laws, comprehensive privacy laws have been introduced to protect the privacy of individuals from the undisclosed or non-consensual sharing of sensitive information for commercial purposes. As the gathering and use of information is such an integral component of our business, we must always be alert for and respond to changes in the information regulatory environment. The failure to comply with these rules, or allegations that we have failed to do so, could result in civil or criminal sanctions against us.

Following the intended acquisition, or opening, of one or more clinics or staffing primary healthcare practitioners in the United States, our centers may participate in the federal Medicare program and, as a result, we will need to comply with a number of additional federal regulatory requirements.

Following the intended acquisition, or opening, of one or more multidisciplinary primary healthcare clinics or the staffing of multidisciplinary primary healthcare clinics, affiliate clinics or eldercare centric homes with clinicians and practitioners in the United States, our clinics and multidisciplinary primary healthcare clinicians and practitioners, including any staffing we might pursue in affiliate clinics or eldercare centric homes in the United States, might participate in the federal Medicare and/or Medicaid programs.

Since 1992, Medicare has paid for the “medically necessary” services of physicians, non-physician practitioners, clinicians and certain other suppliers under a physician fee schedule, a system that pays for covered physicians’ services furnished to a person with Medicare Part B coverage. Under the physician fee schedule, relative values are assigned to each of more than 7,000 services to reflect the amount of work, the direct and indirect (overhead) practice expenses, and the malpractice expenses typically involved in furnishing that service. Each of these three relative value components is multiplied by a geographic adjustment factor to adjust the payment for variations in the costs of furnishing services in different localities. Relative value units, or RVUs, are summed for each service and then are multiplied by a fixed-dollar conversion factor to establish the payment amount for each service. The higher the number of RVUs assigned to a service, the higher the payment. Under the Medicare fee-for-service payment system, an individual can choose any licensed physician enrolled in Medicare and use the services of any healthcare provider or facility certified by Medicare.

CMS is required to limit the growth in spending under the physician fee schedule by a predetermined sustained growth rate, or SGR. If implemented as mandated, the SGR would result in significant payment reductions under the physician fee schedule. Every year since 2003, Congress has delayed application of the SGR, but we cannot predict with certainty whether it will continue to do so. Congress most recently delayed application of the SGR in the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014, or PAMA, which became effective on April 1, 2014. In March of 2014 (prior to the passage of PAMA), CMS announced that the estimated physician fee schedule update for 2014 would be reduced by 20.9% due to the SGR formula. PAMA provides for the continuation of the 0.5% reimbursement increase to the physician payment schedule through December 31, 2014 (originally provided under the Pathway for SGR Reform Act of 2013), and it also provides for no change to the physician fee schedule through March 31, 2015. Although several recent legislative proposals have sought to impose permanent or semi-permanent solutions to the SGR reductions, we cannot predict with certainty whether the SGR will be repealed or if another formula would be substituted and what form that might take. Repeal of the SGR could be offset by further reductions in Medicare payments, and any such reductions could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Furthermore, the ACA reduces annual payment updates for certain providers and reduces Medicare payments for certain procedures, and the Budget Control Act of 2011, or BCA, requires automatic spending reductions for each fiscal year through 2021. As a result of the BCA and subsequent activity in Congress, a $1.2 trillion sequester (across-the-board spending cuts) in discretionary programs took effect in 2013. In particular, a 2% reduction in Medicare payments took effect on April 1, 2013 and has recently been extended for an additional two years beyond the original expiration date of 2021.

Following the intended acquisition, or opening, of one or more clinics or staffing primary healthcare practitioners in the United States, we will be subject to CMS’ RAC program.

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, or MMA, introduced on a trial basis the use of RACs for the purpose of identifying and recouping Medicare overpayments and underpayments. Any overpayment received from Medicare is considered a debt owed to the federal government. In October 2008, CMS made the RAC program permanent. RACs review Medicare claims to determine whether such claims were appropriately reimbursed by Medicare. RACs engage in an automated review and in a complex review of claims. Automated reviews are conducted when a review of the medical record is not required and there is certainty that the service is not covered or is coded incorrectly. Complex reviews involve the review of all underlying medical records supporting the claim; and are generally conducted where there is a high likelihood, but not certainty, that an overpayment has occurred. RACs are paid a contingency fee based on overpayments identified and collected.

A Medicare administrative contractor, or MAC, may suspend Medicare payments to a provider if it determines that an overpayment has occurred. When a Medicare claim for payment is filed, the MAC will notify the patient and the provider of its initial determination regarding reimbursement. The MAC may deny the claim for one of several reasons, including the lack of necessary information or lack of medical necessity for the services rendered. Providers may appeal any denials for claim payments.

Following the intended acquisition, or opening, of one or more clinics or staffing primary healthcare practitioners in the United States, any such reviews under the RAC program or denials by the MAC could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Following the intended acquisition, or opening, of one or more clinics or staffing primary healthcare practitioners in the United States, we will be subject to the Anti-Kickback Statute, FCA, Civil Monetary Penalties statute and analogous provisions of applicable state laws and could face substantial penalties if we fail to comply with such laws.

Anti-Kickback Statute

Following the intended acquisition, or opening, of one or more clinics or staffing primary healthcare practitioners in the United States, if we are participants in the Medicare program, we will be subject to the Anti-kickback Statute. The Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits the knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of remuneration, directly or indirectly, in return for the referral of patients or arranging for the referral of patients, or in return for the recommendation, arrangement, purchase, lease or order of items or services that are covered, in whole or in part, by a federal healthcare program such as Medicare or Medicaid. The term “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value such as gifts, discounts, rebates, waiver of payments or providing anything at less than its fair market value. The ACA amended the intent requirement of the Anti-Kickback Statute such that a person or entity can be found guilty of violating the statute without actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violation the statute. Further, the ACA now provides that claims submitted in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute constitute false or fraudulent claims for purposes of the civil False Claims Act, or FCA, including the failure to timely return an overpayment. Many states have adopted similar prohibitions against kickbacks and other practices that are intended to influence the purchase, lease or ordering of healthcare items and services reimbursed by a governmental health program or state Medicaid program. Some of these state prohibitions apply to remuneration for referrals of healthcare items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial payors.

Following the intended acquisition, or opening, of one or more clinics or staffing primary healthcare practitioners in the United States, if we accept funds from governmental health programs, we will be subject to the Anti-Kickback Statute. Violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute can result in exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental programs as well as civil and criminal penalties, such as $25,000 per violation and up to three times the remuneration involved. If in violation, we may be required to enter into settlement agreements with the government to avoid such sanctions. Typically, such settlement agreements require substantial payments to the government in exchange for the government to release its claims, and may also require entry into a corporate integrity agreement, or CIA. Any such sanctions or obligations contained in a CIA could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

False Claims Act

The federal civil FCA prohibits providers from, among other things, (1) knowingly presenting or causing to be presented, claims for payments from the Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs that are false or fraudulent; (2) knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement to get a false or fraudulent claim paid or approved by the federal government; or (3) knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government. The “qui tam” or “whistleblower” provisions of the FCA allow private individuals to bring actions under the FCA on behalf of the government. These private parties are entitled to share in any amounts recovered by the government, and, as a result, the number of “whistleblower” lawsuits that have been filed against providers has increased significantly in recent years. Defendants found to be liable under the FCA may be required to pay three times the actual damages sustained by the government, plus mandatory civil penalties ranging between $5,500 and $11,000 for each separate false claim.

There are many potential bases for liability under the FCA. The government has used the FCA to prosecute Medicare and other government healthcare program fraud such as coding errors, billing for services not provided, and providing care that is not medically necessary or that is substandard in quality. The ACA also provides that claims submitted in connection with patient referrals that results from violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute constitute false claims for the purpose of the FCA, and some courts have held that a violation of the Stark law can result in FCA liability, as well. In addition, a number of states have adopted their own false claims and whistleblower provisions whereby a private party may file a civil lawsuit in state court. Following the acquisition of one or more clinics or staffing primary healthcare practitioners in the United States, we will be required to provide information to our employees and certain contractors about state and federal false claims laws and whistleblower provisions and protections.

Civil Monetary Penalties Statute

The federal Civil Monetary Penalties statute prohibits, among other things, the offering or giving of remuneration to a Medicare or Medicaid beneficiary that the person or entity knows or should know is likely to influence the beneficiary’s selection of a particular provider or supplier of items or services reimbursable by a federal or state healthcare program.

The scope and enforcement of each of these laws is uncertain and subject to constant change. Federal and state enforcement entities have significantly increased their scrutiny of healthcare companies and providers which has led to investigations, prosecutions, convictions and large settlements. Following the acquisition of one or more clinics or staffing primary healthcare practitioners in the United States, although we intend to conduct our business in compliance with all applicable United States federal and state fraud and abuse laws, many of these laws are broadly worded and may be interpreted or applied in ways that cannot be predicted with any certainty. Therefore, we cannot assure you that our arrangements or business practices will not be subject to government scrutiny or will be found to be in compliance with applicable fraud and abuse laws. Further, responding to investigations can be time consuming and result in significant legal fees and can potentially divert management’s attention from the Company.

Following the intended acquisition, or opening, of one or more clinics or staffing primary healthcare practitioners in the United States, we will be subject to the data privacy, security and breach notification requirements of HIPAA, HITECH and other data privacy and security laws, and the failure to comply with these rules, or allegations that we have failed to do so, could result in civil or criminal sanctions.

Following the intended acquisition, or opening, of one or more multidisciplinary primary healthcare clinics or the staffing of multidisciplinary primary healthcare clinics, affiliate clinics or eldercare centric homes with clinicians and practitioners in the United States, numerous federal and state laws and regulations, including HIPAA and HITECH, will govern the collection, dissemination, security, use and confidentiality of patient-identifiable health information. As required by HIPAA, HHS has adopted standards to protect the privacy and security of this health-related information. The HIPAA privacy regulations contain detailed requirements concerning the use and disclosure of individually identifiable health information and the grant of certain rights to patients with respect to such information by “covered entities.” The Company and each of our clinics is considered a covered entity under HIPAA. We will take actions to comply with the HIPAA privacy regulations including the creation and implementation of policies and procedures, staff training, execution of HIPAA-compliant contractual arrangements with certain service providers and various other measures. Although we believe we will be in substantial compliance, ongoing implementation and oversight of these measures involves significant time, effort and expense.

In addition to the privacy requirements, HIPAA covered entities must implement certain administrative, physical, and technical security standards to protect the integrity, confidentiality and availability of certain electronic health-related information received, maintained, or transmitted by covered entities or their business associates. Although, we will take actions in an effort to be in compliance with these security regulations, a security incident that bypasses our information security systems causing an information security breach, loss of PHI or other data subject to privacy laws or a material disruption of our operational systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, along with fines. Furthermore, ongoing implementation and oversight of these security measures involves significant time, effort and expense.

Further, HITECH, as implemented in part by an omnibus final rule published in the Federal Register on January 25, 2013, further requires that patients be notified of any unauthorized acquisition, access, use, or disclosure of their unsecured PHI that compromises the privacy or security of such information. HHS has established the presumption that all unauthorized uses or disclosures of unsecured PHI constitute breaches unless the covered entity or business associate establishes that there is a low probability the information has been compromised. HITECH and implementing regulations specify that such notifications must be made without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach. Breaches affecting 500 patients or more must be reported immediately to HHS, which will post the name of the breaching entity on its public website. Furthermore, breaches affecting 500 patients or more in the same state or jurisdiction must also be reported to the local media. If a breach involves fewer than 500 people, the covered entity must record it in a log and notify HHS of such breaches at least annually. These breach notification requirements apply not only to unauthorized disclosures of unsecured PHI to outside third parties but also to unauthorized internal access to or use of such PHI.

The scope of the privacy and security requirements under HIPAA was substantially expanded by HITECH, which also increased penalties for violations. Penalties for violations of these laws vary. For instance, penalties for failure to comply with a requirement of HIPAA and HITECH vary significantly, and include significant civil monetary penalties and, in certain circumstances, criminal penalties with fines up to $250,000 per violation and/or imprisonment. In addition, numerous breach incidents could lead to possible penalties in excess of $1.68 million. A person who knowingly obtains or discloses individually identifiable health information in violation of HIPAA may face a criminal penalty of up to $50,000 and up to one-year imprisonment. The criminal penalties increase if the wrongful conduct involves false pretenses or the intent to sell, transfer or use identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain or malicious harm. The amount of penalty that may be assessed depends, in part, upon the culpability of the applicable covered entity or business associate in committing the violation. Some penalties for certain violations that were not due to “willful neglect” may be waived by the Secretary of HHS in whole or in part, to the extent that the payment of the penalty would be excessive relative to the violation. HITECH also authorized state attorneys general to file suit on behalf of residents of their states. Applicable courts may be able to award damages, costs and attorneys’ fees related to violations of HIPAA in such cases. HITECH also mandates that the Secretary of HHS conduct periodic compliance audits of a cross-section of HIPAA covered entities and business associates. Every covered entity and business associate is subject to being audited, regardless of the entity’s compliance record.

State laws may impose more protective privacy restrictions related to health information and may afford individuals a private right of action with respect to the violation of such laws. Both state and federal laws are subject to modification or enhancement of privacy protection at any time. We are subject to any federal or state privacy-related laws that are more restrictive than the privacy regulations issued under HIPAA. These statutes vary and could impose additional requirements on us and more severe penalties for disclosures of health information. If we fail to comply with HIPAA, similar state laws or any new laws, including laws addressing data confidentiality, security or breach notification, we could incur substantial monetary penalties and substantial damage to our reputation.

States may also impose restrictions related to the confidentiality of personal information that is not considered PHI under HIPAA, including certain identifying information and financial information of our patients. Theses state laws may impose additional notification requirements in the event of a breach of such personal information. Failure to comply with such data confidentiality, security and breach notification laws may result in substantial monetary penalties.

HIPAA and HITECH also include standards for common healthcare electronic transactions and code sets, such as claims information, plan eligibility and payment information. Covered entities such as the Company and each of our centers will be required to conform to such transaction set standards.

Following the intended acquisition, or opening, of one or more multidisciplinary primary healthcare clinics or the staffing of multidisciplinary primary healthcare clinics, affiliate clinics or eldercare centric homes with clinicians and practitioners in the United States, if we fail to effectively and timely implement electronic health record systems, our operation could be adversely affected.

As required by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the Secretary of HHS has developed and implemented an incentive payment program for eligible healthcare professionals that adopt and meaningfully use electronic health record, or EHR, technology. HHS uses the Provider Enrollment, Chain and Ownership System, or PECOS, to verify Medicare enrollment prior to making EHR incentive program payments. If our employed professionals are unable to meet the requirements for participation in the incentive payment program, including having an enrollment record in PECOS, we will not be eligible to receive incentive payments that could offset some of the costs of implementing EHR systems. Further, healthcare professionals that fail to demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology are subject to reduced payments from Medicare. System conversions to comply with EHR could be time consuming and disruptive for physicians and employees. Failure to implement EHR systems effectively and in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Following the intended acquisition, or opening, of one or more clinics or staffing primary healthcare practitioners in the United States, we will convert certain of our clinical and patient accounting information system applications to newer versions of existing applications or altogether new applications. In connection with our implementation and conversions, we will likely incur capitalized costs and additional training and implementation expenses.

If we fail to comply with laws and regulations related to the protection of the environment and human health and safety, we could incur substantial penalties and fines.

We are subject to various federal, state and local and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and human health and safety, including those governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of contaminated sites and the maintenance of a safe workplace. Some of our operations include the use, generation and disposal of hazardous materials. We also plan to acquire ownership in new facilities and properties, some of which may have had a history of commercial or other operations. We may, in the future, incur liability under environmental statutes and regulations with respect to contamination of sites we own or operate, including contamination caused by prior owners or operators of such sites, abutters or other persons, and the off-site disposal of hazardous substances. Violations of these laws and regulations may result in substantial civil penalties or fines.

Risks Related to our Telemedicine Medical Technology Platform, Remote Patient Monitoring Medical Technology Platform and Novo Connect Medical Technology Platform

We may be unsuccessful in the development, usage, application and commercialization of each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms.

Our Telemedicine Medical Technology Platform, which is currently operating with limited usage and remains primarily under development, is intended to provide patients with real-time access to third-party primary care medically licensed physicians and specialists in various disciplines as well as multidisciplinary health care clinicians. Telemedicine is transforming traditional approaches to all components of the health industry by providing ease of access and reduced costs for patients, particularly in areas with limited access to primary care licensed physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, specialists and multidisciplinary primary care clinicians. Our advanced Telemedicine Medical Technology Platform intends to integrate certain medical devices, such as a blood pressure reading device, a derma scope and an ophthalmoscope otoscope, each of which can provide the doctor with real-time diagnostic data, greatly enhancing the doctor’s ability to provide the patient with an accurate diagnosis. Our Telemedicine Medical Technology Platform is intended to allow any type of health care clinic or location to install and utilize our Telemedicine Medical Technology Platform at a relatively low-cost point of entry.

Our Remote Patient Monitoring Medical Technology Platform, which is currently operating with limited usage and remains primarily under development, is intended to empower a patient with real-time vital sign information while maintaining a direct technology link from patient to clinician or medical practitioner. The transfer of vital information from home to clinic or patient to clinician allows for the delivery of high quality, non-redundant diagnostic based proactive healthcare. We intend to expand our RPM Platform to not only our Canadian clinics and affiliate clinics but to clinics and medically licensed providers throughout Canada and the United States.

Our Novo Connect Medical Technology Platform is currently in development and build-out. Novo Connect is intended to be an app designed as a secure patient-centered portal which will allow the integration of numerous source systems for patient interface by facilitating communication between the patient and the patient’s provider. The Novo Connect app will be developed for Web, iOS and Android application to optimize communication between source systems. Novo Connect is being designed to allow patients to have direct control of their overall healthcare and wellness by providing a suite of secure, reliable engagement features.

The success of our Medical Technology Platforms will highly be dependent upon our ability to develop relationships with both Canadian based and United States based medically licensed primary care providers and specialist in addition to multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians.

Our success will highly be dependent upon our ability to develop relationship with our patients, primary care medically licensed physicians, nurse practitioners, and specialists in addition to multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians and practitioners. If we cannot generate relationships with these medical professionals to translate into service contracts or license agreements for our Medical Technology Platforms, we may need to cease the development and commercialization of each or all Medical Technology Platform.

Our Medical Technology Platforms may not be accepted in the Canadian and United States marketplace.

Uncertainty exists as to whether our Medical Technology Platforms will be accepted by potential users; including, but not limited to third-party Canadian based and United States based primary care medically licensed physicians and specialists in various medical disciplines, multidisciplinary primary care clinicians and practitioners; as well as patients. A number of factors may limit the market acceptance of our Medical Technology Platforms including the price relative to other product offerings. There is a risk that primary care medically licensed physicians and specialists, multidisciplinary primary health care clinicians or patient acceptance will be encouraged to continue to use other products and/or methods instead of ours. We are assuming that, notwithstanding the fact that our Medical Technology Platforms will be new in the market, primary care medically licensed physicians and specialists, multidisciplinary health care clinicians, or patient acceptance will elect not to use each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms simply because it will provide ease of access and reduced costs for patients.

Primary care medically licensed physicians and specialists, multidisciplinary health care clinicians and patients need to be persuaded that our Medical Technology Platform services are justified for the anticipated benefit, but there is no assurance that sufficient numbers of patients will be convinced to enable a successful market to develop for each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms.

In the event that we are not able to market and significantly increase the number of primary care medically licensed physicians and specialists, multidisciplinary health care clinicians, or patients that use our Medical Technology Platforms, or if we are unable to charge the necessary prices, we may need to cease operating each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms.

Defects or malfunctions in our Medical Technology Platforms could hurt our reputation, sales and profitability.

The acceptance of our Medical Technology Platforms will depend upon their effectiveness and reliability. Each of our Medical Technology Platforms will be complex and will be continually modified and improved, and as such may contain undetected defects or errors when first introduced or as new versions are released. To the extent that defects or errors cause each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms to malfunction and our customers’ use of our Medical Technology Platforms is interrupted, our reputation could suffer, and our potential revenues could decline or be delayed while such defects are remedied. We may also be subject to liability for the defects and malfunctions.

There can be no assurance that, despite our testing, errors will not be found in each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms or new releases, resulting in loss of future revenues or delay in market acceptance, diversion of development resources, damage to our reputation, adverse litigation, or increased service, any of which would have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results and financial condition.

Software failures, breakdowns in the operations of our servers and communications systems or the failure to implement system enhancements could harm our business.

The operational success of our Medical Technology Platforms will depend on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our servers and communications systems. A failure of our network or data gathering procedures could impede services and could result in the loss of primary care medically licensed physician and specialists, multidisciplinary primary care clinicians or patients. While all our operations will have disaster recovery plans in place, they might not adequately protect us. Despite any precautions we take, damage from fire, floods, hurricanes, power loss, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, break-ins and similar events at our computer facilities could result in interruptions in the flow of data to our servers and from our servers to our clients. In addition, any failure by our computer environment to provide our required data communications capacity could result in interruptions in our service. In the event of a server failure, we could be required to transfer our client data collection operations to an alternative provider of server hosting services. Such a transfer could result in delays in our ability to deliver our products and services to our clients.

Additionally, significant delays in the planned delivery of system enhancements, improvements, and inadequate performance of the systems once they are completed could damage our reputation and harm our business. Long-term disruptions in the infrastructure caused by events such as natural disasters, the outbreak of war, the escalation of hostilities and acts of terrorism, particularly involving cities in which we have offices, could adversely affect our businesses. Although, we plan to carry property and business interruption insurance for our business operations, our coverage might not be adequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur.

We face risks related to the storage of customers’ and their end users’ confidential and proprietary information.

Our Medical Technology Platforms are being designed to maintain the confidentiality and security of our patients’ confidential and proprietary data stored on our server systems, which may include sensitive personal data. However, any accidental or willful security breaches or other unauthorized access to these data could expose us to liability for the loss of such information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and other possible liabilities as well as negative publicity. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are difficult to recognize and react to. We may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative or reactionary measures.

We might incur substantial expense to further develop each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms which may never become sufficiently successful.

Our business growth initiatives include the successful development, launch and operations of each and all of our Medical Technology Platforms. Although management will take every precaution to ensure that our Medical Technology Platforms will, with a high degree of likelihood, achieve commercial success, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. The causes for failure of each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms, once commercialized, can be numerous, including:

●       market demand for each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms proves to be smaller than we expect;

●       further each or all of our Medical Technology Platform’s development (i) turns out to be costlier than anticipated or takes longer; (ii) requires significant adjustment post commercialization, rendering the each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms uneconomic or extending considerably the likely investment return period; (iii) additional regulatory requirements may increase the overall costs of the development; patent conflicts or unenforceable intellectual property rights; and (iv) primary care medically licensed physicians and specialists and clients may be unwilling to adopt and/or use each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms.

●       Compliance with changing regulations concerning corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses.

We cannot be certain that we will obtain patents for each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms or that such patent will protect us from competitors.

We believe that our success and competitive position will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patents for each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms, which is both costly and time consuming. We still are in the process of evaluating the patent potential of each and all of our Medical Technology Platforms.  The Patent Office typically requires 12-24 months or more to process a patent application. There can be no assurance that any of our potential patent applications will be approved. There can be no assurance that any potential patent issued or licensed to us will provide us with protection against competitive products, protect us against changes in industry trends which we have may not have anticipated or otherwise protect the commercial viability of each or all of our Medical Technology Platforms, or that challenges will not be instituted against the validity or enforceability of any of our future patents or, if instituted, that such challenges will not be successful. The cost of litigation to uphold the validity of a patent and enforce it against infringement can be substantial. Even issued patents may later be modified or revoked by the Patent and Trademark Office or in legal proceedings. Patent applications in the United States and Canada are maintained in secrecy until the patent issues and, since publication of patents tends to lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that if we obtain patents for our product, we were the first creator of the inventions covered by a pending patent applications or the first to file patent applications on such inventions.

Government regulation of the Internet and e-commerce is evolving, and unfavorable changes could substantially harm our business and results of operations.

We are subject to general business regulations and laws as well as federal, state and provincial regulations and laws specifically governing the internet and e-commerce. Existing and future laws and regulations may impede the growth of the use of the internet, availability of economic broadband access, or other online services, and increase the cost of providing our digital delivery of content and services. These regulations and laws may cover taxation, tariffs, user privacy, data protection, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, electronic contracts and other communications, consumer protection, broadband internet access and the characteristics and quality of services. It is not clear how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, sales, use and other taxes, libel and personal privacy apply to the internet and e-commerce. Unfavorable resolution of these issues may harm our business and results of operations.

Risks Related to the United States Regulatory System as to Medicinal CBD Products

Possible yet unanticipated changes in federal and state law could cause any products that we intend to launch, containing hemp-derived CBD oil to be illegal, or could otherwise prohibit, limit or restrict any of our prospective products containing CBD.

Until 2014, when 7 U.S. Code §5940 became federal law as part of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (the “2014 Farm Act”), products containing oils derived from hemp, notwithstanding a minimal or non-existing THC content, were classified as Schedule I illegal drugs. The 2014 Farm Act expired on September 30, 2018, and was thereafter replaced by the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 on December 20, 2018 (the “2018 Farm Act “), which amended various sections of the U.S. Code, thereby removing hemp, defined as cannabis with less than 0.3% of THC, from Schedule 1 status under the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”), and legalizing the cultivation and sale of hemp at the federal level, subject to compliance with certain federal requirements and state law, amongst other things. THC is the psychoactive component of plants in the cannabis family generally identified as marihuana or marijuana. We anticipate our prospective medical CBD products will be federally legal in the United States in that they will contain less than 0.3% of THC in compliance with the 2018 Farm Bill guidelines and will have no psychoactive effects on our patients and customers bodies. Notwithstanding, there is no assurance that the 2018 Farm Act will not be repealed or amended such that our products containing hemp-derived CBD would once again be deemed illegal under federal law.

The 2018 Farm Bill also shifted regulatory authority from the Drug Enforcement Administration to the Department of Agriculture. The 2018 Farm Bill did not change the United States Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) oversight authority over CBD products. The 2018 Farm Act delegated the authority to the states to regulate and limit the production of hemp and hemp derived products within their territories. Although many states have adopted laws and regulations that allow for the production and sale of hemp and hemp derived products under certain circumstances, no assurance can be given that such state laws may not be repealed or amended such that our intended products containing hemp-derived CBD would once again be deemed illegal under the laws of one or more states now permitting such products, which in turn would render such intended products illegal in those states under federal law even if the federal law is unchanged. In the event of either repeal of federal or of state laws and regulations, or of amendments thereto that are adverse to our prospective medicinal CBD products, we may be restricted or limited with respect to those products that we may sell or distribute, which could adversely impact our intended business plan with respect to such intended products.

Additionally, the FDA has indicated its view that certain types of products containing CBD may not be permissible under the United States Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”). The FDA’s position is related to its approval of Epidiolex, a marijuana-derived prescription medicine to be available in the United States. The active ingredient in Epidiolex is CBD. On December 20, 2018, after the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb issued a statement in which he reiterated the FDA’s position that, among other things, the FDA requires a cannabis product (hemp-derived or otherwise) that is marketed with a claim of therapeutic benefit, or with any other disease claim, to be approved by the FDA for its intended use before it may be introduced into interstate commerce and that the FDCA prohibits introducing into interstate commerce food products containing added CBD, and marketing products containing CBD as a dietary supplement, regardless of whether the substances are hemp-derived. Although our prospective medicinal CBD product offerings will comply with applicable federal and state laws and regulations, legal proceedings alleging violations of such laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

FDA regulation could negatively affect the hemp industry, which would directly affect our financial condition.

The FDA may seek expanded regulation of hemp under the FDCA. Additionally, the FDA may issue rules and regulations, including certified good manufacturing practices, or cGMPs, related to the growth, cultivation, harvesting and processing of hemp. Clinical trials may be needed to verify efficacy and safety. It is also possible that the FDA would require that facilities where hemp is grown register with the FDA and comply with certain federally prescribed regulations. In the event some or all of these regulations are imposed, we do not know what the impact would be on the hemp industry, including what costs, requirements and possible prohibitions may be enforced. If we or our partners are unable to comply with the regulations or registration as prescribed by the FDA, we and or our partners (including C2M) may be unable to continue to operate their and our business in its current or planned form or at all.

Sources of hemp-derived CBD depend upon legality of cultivation, processing, marketing and sales of products derived from those plants under state law of the United States.

Hemp-derived CBD can only be legally produced in states that have laws and regulations that allow for such production and that comply with the 2018 Farm Act, apart from state laws legalizing and regulating medical and recreational cannabis or marijuana, which remains illegal under federal law and regulations. Initially, we intend to use hemp-derived CBD from growers and processors in Canada where such production is legal to produce our prospective medicinal CBD products. Although hemp and hemp seeds may legally be imported into the United States, the importation of products containing THC, including CBD products, into the United States may be illegal if the CBD products cause THC to enter the human body. In that case, we will be required to purchase all our hemp-derived prospective medicinal CBD products from licensed growers and processors in states in the United States where such production is legal. In addition, as described in the preceding risk factor, in the event of repeal or amendment of laws and regulations which are now favorable to the cannabis/hemp industry in such states, we would be required to locate new suppliers in states with laws and regulations that qualify under the 2018 Farm Act. If we were to be unsuccessful in arranging new sources of supply of our raw ingredients, or if our raw ingredients were to become legally unavailable, our intended business plan with respect to such products could be adversely impacted.

Because our distributors may only sell and ship our products containing hemp-derived CBD in states that have adopted laws and regulations qualifying under the 2018 Farm Act, a reduction in the number of states having such qualifying laws and regulations could limit, restrict or otherwise preclude the sale of intended products containing hemp-derived CBD.

The interstate shipment of hemp-derived CBD from one state to another is legal only where both states have laws and regulations that allow for the production and sale of such products and that qualify under the 2018 Farm Act. Therefore, the marketing and sale of our intended products containing hemp-derived CBD is limited by such factors and is restricted to such states. Although we believe we may lawfully sell any of our finished products, including those containing CBD, in a majority of states, a repeal or adverse amendment of laws and regulations that are now favorable to the distribution, marketing and sale of finished products we intend to sell could significantly limit, restrict or prevent us from generating revenue related to our products that contain hemp-derived CBD. Any such repeal or adverse amendment of now favorable laws and regulations could have an adverse impact on our business plan with respect to such products.

Due to projected expansion into the CBD industry, we may have a difficult time obtaining the various insurances that are desired to operate our business, which may expose us to additional risk and financial liability.

Insurance that is otherwise readily available, such as general liability, and directors and officer’s insurance, may become more difficult for us to find, and more expensive, due to our intended launch of certain medically related products containing hemp-derived CBD. There are no guarantees that we will be able to find such insurances in the future, or that the cost will be affordable to us. If we are forced to go without such insurances, it may prevent us from entering into certain business sectors, may inhibit our growth, and may expose us to additional risk and financial liabilities.

Our products may not meet health and safety standards or could become contaminated.

We have adopted various quality, environmental, health and safety standards. We do not have control over all the third parties involved in the manufacturing of our products and their compliance with government health and safety standards. Even if our products meet these standards, they could otherwise become contaminated. A failure to meet these standards or contamination could occur in our operations or those of our manufacturers, distributors or suppliers. This could result in expensive production interruptions, recalls and liability claims. Moreover, negative publicity could be generated from false, unfounded or nominal liability claims or limited recalls. Any of these failures or occurrences could negatively affect our business and financial performance.

The sale of our products involves product liability and related risks that could expose us to significant insurance and loss expenses.

We face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims if the use of our products results in, or is believed to have resulted in, illness or injury. Our products contain combinations of ingredients, and there is little long-term experience with the effect of these combinations. In addition, interactions of these products with other products, prescription medicines and over-the-counter drugs have not been fully explored or understood and may have unintended consequences. While our third-party manufacturers perform tests in connection with the formulations of our products, these tests are not designed to evaluate the inherent safety of our products.

Any product liability claim may increase our costs and adversely affect our revenue and operating income. Moreover, liability claims arising from a serious adverse event may increase our costs through higher insurance premiums and deductibles and may make it more difficult to secure adequate insurance coverage in the future. In addition, our product liability insurance may fail to cover future product liability claims, which, if adversely determined, could subject us to substantial monetary damages.

Confusion between legal CBD and illegal Cannabis

There is the risk that confusion or uncertainty surrounding products that are offered with regulated cannabis could occur on the state or federal level and impact us. We may have difficulty with establishing banking relationships, working with investment banks and brokers who would be willing to offer and sell our securities or accept deposits from shareholders, and auditors willing to certify our financial statements if we are confused with businesses that are in the cannabis business. Any of these additional factors, should they occur, could also affect our business, prospects, assets or results of operation could have a material adverse effect on the business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

Risks Related to our Common Stock and our Status as a Public Company

As a result of being a public company, we are subject to additional reporting and corporate governance requirements that will require additional management time, resources and expense.

As a public company we are obligated to file with the SEC annual and quarterly information and other reports that are specified in the Exchange Act. We are also subject to other reporting and corporate governance requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, all of which impose significant compliance and reporting obligations upon us and require us to incur additional expense in order to fulfill such obligations.

Trading on the OTC Markets is volatile and sporadic, which could depress the market price of our common stock and make it difficult for our security holders to sell their common stock.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB tier of the OTC Markets. Trading in securities quoted on the OTC Markets is often thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices, due to many factors, some of which may have little to do with our operations or business prospects. This volatility could depress the market price of our common stock for reasons unrelated to operating performance. Moreover, the OTC Markets is not a stock exchange, and trading of securities on the OTC Markets is often more sporadic than the trading of securities listed on a quotation system like Nasdaq Capital Market or a stock exchange like the NYSE American. These factors may result in investors having difficulty selling any shares of our common stock.

Our stock price is likely to be highly volatile because of several factors, including a limited public float.

The market price of our common stock has been volatile in the past and the market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile in the future. You may not be able to sell shares of our common stock following periods of volatility because of the market’s adverse reaction to volatility.

Other factors that could cause such volatility may include, among other things:

●       actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;

●       the absence of securities analysts covering us and distributing research and recommendations about us;

●       we may have a low trading volume for a number of reasons, including that a large portion of our stock is closely held;

●       overall stock market fluctuations;

●       announcements concerning our business or those of our competitors;

●       actual or perceived limitations on our ability to raise capital when we require it, and to raise such capital on favorable terms;

●       conditions or trends in the industry;

●       litigation;

●       changes in market valuations of other similar companies;

●       future sales of common stock;

●       departure of key personnel or failure to hire key personnel; and

●       general market conditions.

Any of these factors could have a significant and adverse impact on the market price of our common stock and/or warrants. In addition, the stock market in general has at times experienced extreme volatility and rapid decline that has often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock and/or warrants, regardless of our actual operating performance.

Our common stock is a “penny stock” under SEC rules. It may be more difficult to sell securities classified as “penny stock.”

Our common stock is a “penny stock” under applicable SEC rules (generally defined as non-exchange traded stock with a per-share price below $5.00). Unless we successfully list our common stock on a national securities exchange, or maintain a per-share price above $5.00, these rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers that recommend the purchase or sale of penny stocks to persons other than those who qualify as “established customers” or “accredited investors.” For example, broker-dealers must determine the appropriateness for non-qualifying persons of investments in penny stocks. Broker-dealers must also provide, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, disclose the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, furnish monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account, provide a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser, and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction.

Legal remedies available to an investor in “penny stocks” may include the following:

●       If a “penny stock” is sold to the investor in violation of the requirements listed above, or other federal or states securities laws, the investor may be able to cancel the purchase and receive a refund of the investment.

●       If a “penny stock” is sold to the investor in a fraudulent manner, the investor may be able to sue the persons and firms that committed the fraud for damages.

These requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity, if any, in the secondary market for a security that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our securities, which could severely limit the market price and liquidity of our securities. These requirements may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and may affect your ability to sell our common stock.

Many brokerage firms will discourage or refrain from recommending investments in penny stocks. Most institutional investors will not invest in penny stocks. In addition, many individual investors will not invest in penny stocks due, among other reasons, to the increased financial risk generally associated with these investments.

For these reasons, penny stocks may have a limited market and, consequently, limited liquidity. We can give no assurance at what time, if ever, our common stock will not be classified as a “penny stock” in the future.

If we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, the price of our securities may be adversely affected.

Our internal control over financial reporting may have weaknesses and conditions that could require correction or remediation, the disclosure of which may have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock. We are required to establish and maintain appropriate internal control over financial reporting. Failure to establish those controls, or any failure of those controls once established, could adversely affect our public disclosures regarding our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting may identify weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting or other matters that may raise concerns for investors. Any actual or perceived weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting or disclosure of management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting may have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

We are required to comply with certain provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and if we fail to continue to comply, our business could be harmed and the price of our securities could decline.

Rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act require an annual assessment of internal control over financial reporting, and for certain issuers an attestation of this assessment by the issuer’s independent registered public accounting firm. The standards that must be met for management to assess the internal control over financial reporting as effective are evolving and complex, and require significant documentation, testing, and possible remediation to meet the detailed standards. We expect to incur significant expenses and to devote resources to Section 404 compliance on an ongoing basis. It is difficult for us to predict how long it will take or costly it will be to complete the assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for each year and to remediate any deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. As a result, we may not be able to complete the assessment and remediation process on a timely basis. In the event that our Chief Executive Officer or Principal Financial Officer determines that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective as defined under Section 404, we cannot predict how regulators will react or how the market prices of our securities will be affected; however, we believe that there is a risk that investor confidence and the market value of our securities may be negatively affected.

Shares eligible for future sale may adversely affect the market.

From time to time, certain of our stockholders may be eligible to sell all or some of their shares of common stock by means of ordinary brokerage transactions in the open market pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act, subject to certain limitations. In general, pursuant to Rule 144, non-affiliate stockholders may sell freely after six months, subject only to the current public information requirement. Affiliates may sell after six months, subject to the Rule 144 volume, manner of sale (for equity securities), current public information, and notice requirements. Of the approximately 23,794,098 shares of our common stock outstanding as of February 19, 2021, approximately 3,933,535 shares are tradable without restriction.  Given the limited trading of our common stock, resale of even a small number of shares of our common stock pursuant to Rule 144 or an effective registration statement may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Substantial future sales of shares of our common stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

The market price of shares of our common stock could decline as a result of substantial sales of our common stock, particularly sales by our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders, a large number of shares of our common stock becoming available for sale or the perception in the market that holders of a large number of shares intend to sell their shares.

Provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws may delay or prevent a takeover which may not be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation and our bylaws, as amended, may be deemed to have anti-takeover effects, which include when and by whom special meetings of our stockholders may be called, and may delay, defer or prevent a takeover attempt. Further, our amended and restated articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by our board of directors in their sole discretion. Our board of directors may, without stockholder approval, issue series of preferred stock with dividends, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights that could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of our common stock.

We do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

We do not intend to declare dividends for the foreseeable future, as we anticipate that we will reinvest any future earnings in the development and growth of our business. Therefore, investors will not receive any funds unless they sell their common stock, and stockholders may be unable to sell their shares on favorable terms. We cannot assure you of a positive return on investment or that you will not lose the entire amount of your investment in our common stock.