Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.00001 par value per share
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions
of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
The aggregate market value of the common
stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 29, 2012, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently
completed fiscal quarter, was $6,794,767, based on the closing sale price for the registrant’s common stock on that date.
For purposes of determining this number, all officers and directors of the registrant are considered to be affiliates of the registrant.
This number is provided only for the purpose of this report on Form 10-K and does not represent an admission by either the registrant
or any such person as to the status of such person.
The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Common
Stock on June 14, 2013 was 64,947,025 .
All of the information in this Form 10-K/A
is as of December 31, 2012 (unless explicitly identified as of another date) and does not reflect events or circumstances that
may have occurred after the Original Filing or otherwise update disclosures (including the exhibits to the Original Filing other
than Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2 described below), except with respect to the restatement and related matters in the following
sections:
This Form 10-K/A includes new Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
certificates as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2, and new certifications pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2.
PART I
ITEM 1. Business
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A (this “
Annual Report
”) includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Annual Report which address activities, events
or developments which we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The word
“believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “estimates,”
“predicts” and similar expressions are also intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking
statements include, among others, such things as:
|
•
|
amounts and nature of future revenues and margins from our Construction Services segment;
|
|
•
|
the likely impact of new or existing regulations or market forces on the demand for our services;
|
|
•
|
expansion and other development trends of the industries we serve; and
|
|
•
|
our ability to generate sufficient cash from operations or to raise cash in order to meet our short and long-term capital requirements.
|
These statements are
based on certain assumptions and analyses we made in light of our experience and our perception of historical trends, current conditions
and expected future developments as well as other factors we believe are appropriate. However, whether actual results and developments
will conform to our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results
to differ materially from our expectations, including:
|
•
|
the risk factors discussed in Item 1A of this Annual Report and listed from time to time in
our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “
Commission
” or “
SEC
”);
|
|
•
|
the inherently uncertain outcome of current and future litigation;
|
|
•
|
the adequacy of our reserves for contingencies;
|
|
•
|
economic, market or business conditions in general and in the oil, gas and power industries in
particular;
|
|
•
|
changes in laws or regulations; and
|
|
•
|
other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
|
Consequently, all
of the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance
that the actual results or developments anticipated by us will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have
the expected consequences or effects on our business operations. We assume no obligation to update publicly, except as required
by law, any such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
The following discussion
should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this Annual
Report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual
results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute
to such differences include, but are not limited to those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report, particularly in
the section entitled "Risk Factors". Our audited financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles.
BACKGROUND
Texas Gulf Energy,
Incorporated, a Nevada corporation (the “
Company
,” “
we
,” “
us
,” “
our
”), was incorporated as Nature of Beauty, Inc. under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 22, 2007. Initially,
the Company was engaged in the business of purchasing and distributing all-natural and organic everyday skin care products from
Russia. In October 2009, the Company changed the focus of its business to developing "green" products and technologies,
including unique cleaning and environmental remediation products and changed its name to “Bio-Clean, Inc.” Subsequently,
on October 8, 2010, the Company changed its name to “Global NuTech, Inc.” and executed two different joint venture
agreements and provided the sales and marketing operations for the sale of various products. In December 2011 the company acquired
International Plant Services, L.L.P. (“
IPS
”) and changed its focus to providing construction services to the
downstream energy business. Subsequently, in the first quarter of 2012 the Company changed its name to “Texas Gulf Energy,
Incorporated” to better reflect its new focus in the market. Since the acquisition of IPS, the Company has completed several
acquisitions and established other business units.
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
We have seen what
we consider to be a strong recovery from the global recession in the underlying business environment in which the Company operates.
We continue to see signs of recovery and growth and plan to capitalize on opportunities that are presented by the market as it
recovers further in the coming months and years.
OPERATING SEGMENTS
As of the reporting end of the fiscal year
2012, we had four (4) reportable segments, the “International Plant Services, LLC,” “Texas Gulf Oil & Gas,
Inc.,” “TGE Electrical and Instrumentation” and “Fishbone Solutions, Inc.” segments.
International
Plant Solutions, LLC
Our International
Plant Services or “Construction Services” segment provides turnkey and specialty construction services to a wide range
of industrial and energy sector clients. Our scope of services includes project planners, welders, fitters and millwrights. These
services are provided for projects of varying complexities, schedule durations, and budgets. Our project experience includes retrofits,
modifications and expansions to existing facilities as well as the construction of new facilities.
Texas Gulf Oil
& Gas, Inc.
The primary assets
of Texas Gulf Oil & Gas, Inc. include leases, options and interests in nineteen (19) oil wells throughout the Austin Chalk
near Luling, Texas, as well as options on wells to be drilled or re-entered in three (3) leases identified as the Tilmon, Lay,
and Rodenberg. Texas Gulf Oil & Gas, Inc. also provides well services to other companies and individual oil well owners.
Effective September 6, 2012, we sold ninety-one percent (91%) of our equity interests in Texas Gulf Oil & Gas, Inc.
TGE Electrical
and Instrumentation
Our product offerings
include electrical construction and installation of instrumentation and control systems. Our experience spans a wide range of industries
including power generation and transmission, refining, petrochemical and heavy industrial. In addition to ground-up construction,
our management and technical teams perform expansion projects, critical path turnarounds, emergency response and staff augmentation
services. As part of our electrical capabilities, we have the experience and expertise to install complex instrumentation and control
systems. This service includes instrument calibration, loop checks, commissioning, and start-up.
Electrical and instrumentation
repair and maintenance services include routine and preventive maintenance, emergency response, and outage support for various
industries including power, petroleum and petrochemical.
Fishbone Solutions,
Inc.
Our Fishbone Solutions
segment consists mainly of the business acquired from our acquisition of Fishbone Solutions, Inc. on February 3, 2012. Fishbone
Solutions, Inc. provides experienced personnel and systems to ensure repeatable performance in the following services: primavera
scheduling, field design and drafting, P&ID updates, CAD work for fabrication, SCOPE Software for field planning, subcontract
management, project management, project controls, material procurement and management, and construction related administration
functions. We use enhanced digital photography in our SCOPE Development Process and we supply high quality teams to define, schedule
and manage projects from "cradle to grave" nationwide.
OTHER BUSINESS MATTERS
Customers and
Marketing
The Company derives
a significant portion of its revenues from performing services for engineering firms, general contractors, and petrochemical and
industrial gas companies and ultimately the integrated oil companies, independent petroleum refiners, and pipeline, terminal and
oil and gas marketing companies. The loss of significant work from any of these classes of customers or an overall decline in the
petroleum industry could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company provided services to approximately thirty (30)
customers in 2012.
Three (3) customers
represented 11%, 11% and 7% of the Company’s gross sales for the year ended December 31, 2012. Three (3) companies represented
26%, 12% and 7% of outstanding accounts receivable at December 31, 2012. Four (4) customers represented 25%, 14%, 13% and 11% of
the Company’s gross sales for the year ended December 31, 2011. Four (4) companies represented 25%, 16%, 11% and 11% of outstanding
accounts receivable at December 31, 2011.
The Company markets
its services and products primarily through its marketing and business development personnel, senior professional staff and its
operating management. The business development personnel concentrate on developing new customers and assisting management with
existing customers. We competitively bid most of our projects. However, we have a number of preferred provider relationships with
customers who award us work through long-term agreements. Our projects have durations of a few days to multiple years.
Competition
We compete with local,
regional, national and international contractors in the Construction Services segment. Competitors generally vary within the markets
we serve with few competitors competing in all of the markets we serve or for all of the services we provide. Contracts are generally
awarded based on price, reputation for quality, customer satisfaction, safety record and programs, and schedule. We believe that
our turnkey capabilities, expertise, experience and reputation for providing safe, timely, and quality services allow us to compete
effectively in the markets that we serve.
Seasonality
Planned maintenance
projects at customer facilities are typically scheduled in the spring and the fall when the demand for gasoline is lower. As a
result, quarterly operating results in our Construction Services segment can fluctuate materially. Our business can also be affected
by seasonal weather conditions including hurricanes, snowstorms, abnormally low or high temperatures or other inclement weather,
which can result in reduced activities.
Insurance
The Company maintains insurance coverage
for various aspects of its operations. However, exposure to potential losses is retained through the use of deductibles, coverage
limits and self-insured retentions.
Employees
As
of December 31, 2012, we had 252 employees of which 19 were employed in non-field positions and 233 were employed in field
or shop positions. The number of employees varies significantly throughout the year because of the number, type and size of
projects we have in process at any particular time.
Regulation
Health and Safety Regulations
Our
operations are subject to the requirements of the United States Occupational Safety and Health Act (“
OSHA
”),
and comparable state laws. Regulations promulgated by this agency require employers and independent contractors to implement work
practices, medical surveillance systems and personnel protection programs to protect employees from workplace hazards and exposure
to hazardous chemicals and materials. In recognition of the potential for accidents within various scopes of work, these agencies
have enacted strict and comprehensive safety regulations. The Company has established comprehensive programs for complying with
health and safety regulations to protect the safety of its workers, subcontractors and customers. While the Company believes that
it operates safely and prudently, there can be no assurance that accidents will not occur or that the Company will not incur substantial
liability in connection with the operation of its business.
Environmental
The
Company’s operations are subject to extensive and changing environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations
relate primarily to air and water pollutants and the management and disposal of hazardous materials. The Company is exposed to
potential liability for personal injury or property damage caused by any release, spill, exposure or other accident involving such
pollutants, substances or hazardous materials.
The Company believes
that it is currently in compliance, in all material aspects, with all applicable environmental laws and regulations. The Company
does not expect any material charges in subsequent periods relating to environmental conditions that currently exist and does not
foresee any significant future capital spending relating to environmental matters.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
The following risk factors should be
considered with the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. As we operate in a continuously changing environment,
other risk factors may emerge which could have material adverse effects on our results of operations, financial condition and cash
flow.
Risk Factors Related to Our Business
Unsatisfactory safety performance may subject us to penalties,
can affect customer relationships, result in higher operating costs, negatively impact employee morale and result in higher employee
turnover.
Workplace safety is
important to the Company, our employees, and our customers. As a result, we maintain comprehensive safety programs and training
for all applicable employees throughout our organization. While we focus on protecting people and property, our work is performed
at construction sites and in industrial facilities and our workers are subject to the normal hazards associated with providing
these services. Even with proper safety precautions, these hazards can lead to personal injury, loss of life, damage to or destruction
of property, plant and equipment, and environmental damage. We are intensely focused on maintaining a strong safety environment
and reducing the risk of accidents to the lowest possible level.
Although we have taken
what we believe are appropriate precautions to adequately train and equip our employees, we may experience accidents in the future.
Serious accidents may subject us to penalties, civil litigation or criminal prosecution. Claims for damages to persons, including
claims for bodily injury or loss of life, could result in costs and liabilities, which could materially and adversely affect our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Demand for our products and services is cyclical and is
vulnerable to the level of capital and maintenance spending of our customers and to downturns in the industries and markets we
serve as well as conditions in the general economy.
The demand for our
products and services depends upon the existence of construction and repair and maintenance projects in the downstream petroleum,
power and other heavy industries in the United States and Canada. Therefore, it is likely that our business will continue to be
cyclical in nature and vulnerable to general downturns in the United States, Canadian and world economies and declines in commodity
prices, which could adversely affect the demand for our products and services.
Our Construction Services
segment’s revenue and cash flow are dependent upon engineering and construction projects. The availability of these projects
is dependent upon the economic condition in the oil, gas, and power industries, specifically, the level of capital expenditures
on energy infrastructure. A prolonged period of sluggish economic conditions in North America has had and may continue to have
an adverse impact on the level of capital expenditures of our customers and/or their ability to finance these expenditures. Our
failure to obtain projects, the delay of project awards, the cancellation of projects or delays in the completion of contracts
are factors that may result in under-utilization of our resources, which would adversely impact our revenue, operating results
and cash flow. There are numerous factors beyond our control that influence the level of capital expenditures of oil, gas and power
companies, including:
|
•
|
current or projected commodity prices, including oil, gas and power prices;
|
|
•
|
the demand for oil, gas and electricity;
|
|
•
|
the ability of oil, gas and power companies to generate, access and deploy capital;
|
|
•
|
exploration, production and transportation costs;
|
|
•
|
tax incentives, including those for alternative energy projects;
|
|
•
|
regulatory restraints on the rates that power companies may charge their customers; and
|
|
•
|
local, national and international political and economic conditions.
|
Our results of operations depend upon the award of new
contracts and the timing of those awards.
Our revenues are derived
primarily from contracts awarded on a project-by-project basis. Generally, it is difficult to predict whether and when we will
be awarded a new contract due to lengthy and complex bidding and selection processes, changes in existing or forecasted market
conditions, access to financing, governmental regulations, permitting and environmental matters. Because our revenues are derived
from contract awards, our results of operations and cash flows can fluctuate materially from period to period.
The uncertainty associated
with the timing of contract awards may reduce our short-term profitability as we balance our current capacity with expectations
of future contract awards. If an expected contract award is delayed or not received, we could incur costs to maintain an idle workforce
that may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Alternatively, we may decide that our long-term interests
are best served by reducing our workforce and incurring increased costs associated with severance and termination benefits which
also could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for the period when incurred. Reducing our workforce could
also impact our results of operations if we are unable to adequately staff projects that are awarded subsequent to a workforce
reduction.
We face substantial competition in each of our business
segments, which may have a material adverse effect on our business.
We face competition
in all areas of our business from regional, national and international competitors. Our competitors range from small family owned
businesses to well-established, well-financed entities, both privately and publicly held, including many major equipment manufacturers,
large engineering and construction companies and specialty contractors. We compete primarily on the basis of price, customer satisfaction,
safety performance and programs, quality of our products and services, and schedule. As a result of the continuing effects of the
economic slowdown on capital and maintenance spending, we may continue to experience pressure on our operating margins.
The loss of one or more of our significant customers could
adversely affect us.
One or more customers
have in the past and may in the future contribute a material portion of our revenues in any one year. Because these significant
customers generally contract with us for specific projects or for specific periods of time, we may lose these customers from year
to year as the projects or maintenance contracts are completed. The loss of business from any one of these customers could have
a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations.
Our profitability could be negatively impacted if we are
not able to maintain appropriate utilization of our workforce.
The extent to which
we utilize our workforce affects our profitability. If we under utilize our workforce, our project gross margins and overall profitability
suffer in the short-term. If we over utilize our workforce, we may negatively impact safety, employee satisfaction and project
execution, which could result in a decline of future project awards. The utilization of our workforce is impacted by numerous factors
including:
|
•
|
our estimate of the headcount requirements for various operating units based upon our forecast
of the demand for our products and services;
|
|
•
|
our ability to maintain our talent base and manage attrition;
|
|
•
|
our ability to schedule our portfolio of projects to efficiently utilize our employees and minimize
downtime between project assignments; and
|
|
•
|
our need to invest time and resources into functions such as training, business development, employee
recruiting, and sales that are not chargeable to customer projects.
|
We are exposed to credit risk from customers. If we experience
delays and/or defaults in customer payments, we could suffer liquidity problems or we could be unable to recover amounts owed to
us.
Under the terms of
our contracts, at times we commit resources to customer projects prior to receiving payments from customers in amounts sufficient
to cover expenditures on these projects as they are incurred. Delays in customer payments require an investment in working capital.
If customers default in making payments on projects, it could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions
that we use to prepare our financial statements.
To prepare financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions,
as of the date of the financial statements, which affect the reported values of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Areas requiring significant estimation by our management include:
|
•
|
provisions for uncollectible receivables from customers for invoiced amounts;
|
|
•
|
the amount and collectability of unapproved change orders and claims against
customers;
|
|
•
|
provisions for income taxes and related valuation allowances;
|
|
•
|
valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with business
combinations; and
|
|
•
|
accruals for estimated liabilities, including litigation and insurance reserves.
|
Our actual
results could materially differ from these estimates.
An inability to attract and retain qualified personnel,
and in particular, engineers, project managers and skilled craft workers, could impact our ability to perform on our contracts,
which could harm our business and impair our future revenues and profitability.
Our ability to attract
and retain qualified engineers, project managers, skilled craftsmen and other experienced professionals in accordance with our
needs is an important factor in our ability to maintain profitability and grow our business. The market for these professionals
is competitive, particularly during periods of economic growth when the supply is limited. We cannot provide any assurance that
we will be successful in our efforts to retain or attract qualified personnel when needed. Therefore, when we anticipate or experience
growing demand for our services, we may incur additional cost to maintain a professional staff in excess of our current contract
needs in an effort to have sufficient qualified personnel available to address this anticipated demand. If we do incur additional
compensation and benefit costs, our customer contracts may not allow us to pass through these costs.
Competent and experienced
engineers, project managers, and craft workers are especially critical to the profitable performance of our contracts, particularly
on our fixed-price contracts where superior design and execution of the project can result in profits greater than originally estimated
or where inferior design and project execution can reduce or eliminate estimated profits or even result in a loss.
Our project managers
are involved in most aspects of contracting and contract execution including:
|
•
|
supervising the bidding process, including providing estimates of significant
cost components, such as material and equipment needs, and the size, productivity and composition of the workforce;
|
|
•
|
supervising project performance, including performance by our employees,
subcontractors and other third-party suppliers and vendors;
|
|
•
|
negotiating requests for change orders and the final terms of approved change
orders; and
|
|
•
|
determining and documenting claims by us for increased costs incurred due
to the failure of customers, subcontractors and other third-party suppliers of equipment and materials to perform on a timely basis
and in accordance with contract terms.
|
Future events, including those associated with our growth
strategy, could negatively affect our liquidity position.
We can provide no
assurance that we will have sufficient cash from operations or the credit capacity to meet all of our future cash needs should
we encounter significant working capital requirements or incur significant acquisition costs. Insufficient cash from operations,
significant working capital requirements, and contract disputes have in the past, and could in the future, reduce availability
under our credit facility.
There are integration and consolidation risks associated
with our acquisition strategy. Future acquisitions may result in significant transaction expenses, unexpected liabilities and risks
associated with entering new markets, and we may be unable to profitably operate these businesses.
An aspect of our business
strategy is to make strategic acquisitions in markets where we currently operate as well as in markets in which we have not previously
operated.
We may lack sufficient
management, financial and other resources to successfully integrate future acquisitions. Any future acquisitions may result in
significant transaction expenses, unexpected liabilities and risks associated with entering new markets in addition to the integration
and consolidation risks.
If we make any future
acquisitions, we likely will have exposure to third parties for liabilities of the acquired business or assets that may or may
not be adequately covered by insurance or by indemnification, if any, from the former owners of the acquired business or assets.
Any of these unexpected liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are involved, and are likely to continue to be involved
in legal proceedings, which will increase our costs and, if adversely determined, could have a material effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
We are currently a
defendant in legal proceedings arising from the operation of our business and it is reasonable to expect that we would be named
in future actions. Many of the actions against us arise out of the normal course of performing services on project sites, and include
claims for workers’ compensation, personal injury and property damage. From time to time, we are also named as a defendant
for actions involving the violation of federal and state labor laws related to employment practices and wages and benefits and
in contract disputes with customers.
We maintain insurance
against operating hazards in amounts that we believe are customary in our industry. However, our insurance has deductibles and
coverage exclusions so we cannot provide assurance that we are adequately insured against all types of risks that are associated
with the conduct of our business. A successful claim brought against us in excess of, or outside of, our insurance coverage could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Litigation, regardless
of its outcome, is expensive, typically diverts the efforts of our management away from operations for varying periods of time,
and can disrupt or otherwise adversely impact our relationships with current or potential customers and suppliers. Payment and
claim disputes with customers may also cause us to incur increased interest costs resulting from incurring indebtedness under our
revolving line of credit or receiving less interest income resulting from fewer funds invested due to the failure to receive payment
for disputed claims and accounts.
International Plant Services, LLC (IPS) depends on the
Foreign Guest Worker Visa Program for a significant portion of its revenue. We have been unable to obtain new Visas since 2011.
If the current policies of the United States Department of Labor and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security regarding the Guest
Worker Visa Program do not change, IPS will continue to see a decline in available workers which will likely have an adverse effect
on our revenues.
IPS continues to process Visas for guest workers but has not
had a new visa or renewal approved since 2011. While we continue to deploy American workers under IPS, particularly into Canada
and other foreign locations, IPS will lose most of its foreign workers by the 3
rd
quarter of 2013 if there is no change
in US Policy. This will reduce revenue and earnings from IPS to near zero, if we are not successful in deploying American Workers
or winning approval of new Visas.
Our projects expose us to potential professional liability,
product liability, warranty and other claims, which could be expensive, damage our reputation and harm our business. We may not
be able to obtain or maintain adequate insurance to cover these claims.
We perform construction
services at large industrial facilities where accidents or system failures can be disastrous and costly. Any catastrophic occurrence
in excess of our insurance limits at locations engineered or constructed by us or where our products are installed or services
performed could result in significant professional liability, product liability, warranty and other claims against us by our customers,
including claims for cost overruns and the failure of the project to meet contractually specified milestones or performance standards.
Further, the rendering of our services on these projects could expose us to risks and claims by third parties and governmental
agencies for personal injuries, property damage and environmental matters, among others. Any claim, regardless of its merit or
eventual outcome, could result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention and create negative publicity, particularly
for claims relating to environmental matters where the amount of the claim could be extremely large. We may not be able to or may
choose not to obtain or maintain insurance coverage for the types of claims described above. If we are unable to obtain insurance
at an acceptable cost or otherwise protect against the claims described above, we will be exposed to significant liabilities, which
may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Employee, subcontractor or partner misconduct or our overall
failure to comply with laws or regulations could harm our reputation, damage our relationships with customers, reduce our revenues
and profits, and subject us to criminal and civil enforcement actions.
Misconduct, fraud,
non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations, or other improper activities by one of our employees, subcontractors or partners
could have a significant negative impact on our business and reputation. Such misconduct could include the failure to comply with
safety standards, laws and regulations, customer requirements, regulations pertaining to the internal controls over financial reporting,
environmental laws and any other applicable laws or regulations. The precautions we take to prevent and detect these activities
may not be effective, since our internal controls are subject to inherent limitations, including human error, the possibility that
controls could be circumvented or become inadequate because of changed conditions, and fraud.
Our failure to comply
with applicable laws or regulations or acts of misconduct could subject us to fines and penalties, harm our reputation, damage
our relationships with customers, reduce our revenues and profits and subject us to criminal and civil enforcement actions.
We rely on internally and externally developed software
applications and systems to support critical functions including project management, estimating, human resources, accounting, and
financial reporting. Any sudden loss, disruption or unexpected costs to maintain these systems could significantly increase our
operational expense as well as disrupt the management of our business operations.
We rely on various
software systems to operate our critical operating and administrative functions. We depend on our software vendors to provide long-term
software maintenance support for our information systems. Software vendors may decide to discontinue further development, integration
or long-term software maintenance support for our information systems, in which case we may need to abandon one or more of our
current information systems and migrate some or all of our project management, human resources, estimating, accounting and financial
information to other systems, thus increasing our operational expense as well as disrupting the management of our business operations.
Our business may be affected by difficult work sites and
environments, which may adversely affect our overall business.
We perform our work
under a variety of conditions, including, but not limited to, difficult terrain, difficult site conditions and busy urban centers
where delivery of materials and availability of labor may be impacted. Performing work under these conditions can slow our progress,
potentially causing us to incur contractual liability to our customers. These difficult conditions may also cause us to incur additional,
unanticipated costs that we might not be able to pass on to our customers.
We are susceptible to adverse weather conditions, which
may harm our business and financial results.
Our business may be adversely affected
by severe weather in areas where we have significant operations. Repercussions of severe weather conditions may include:
|
•
|
curtailment of services;
|
|
•
|
suspension of operations;
|
|
•
|
inability to meet performance schedules in accordance with contracts;
|
|
•
|
weather related damage to our facilities;
|
|
•
|
disruption of information systems;
|
|
•
|
inability to receive machinery, equipment and materials at jobsites; and
|
Environmental factors and changes in laws and regulations
could increase our costs and liabilities.
Our operations are
subject to environmental laws and regulations, including those concerning emissions into the air; discharges into waterways; generation,
storage, handling, treatment and disposal of hazardous material and wastes; and health and safety.
We are subject to
numerous other laws and regulations including those related to the business registrations and licenses, environment, workplace,
employment, health and safety. These laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and could become more stringent in the
future. It is impossible to predict the effect on us of any future changes to these laws and regulations. We can provide no absolute
assurance that our operations will continue to comply with future laws and regulations or that the costs to comply with these laws
and regulations and/or a failure to comply with these laws will not significantly adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
International operations are subject to a number of risks
that could negatively affect future operating results or subject us to criminal and civil enforcement actions.
We are seeking to
expand our business internationally. International business is subject to a variety of risks, including:
|
•
|
lack of developed legal systems to enforce contractual rights;
|
|
•
|
greater risk of uncontrollable accounts and longer collection cycles;
|
|
•
|
Subject to claims under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;
|
|
•
|
foreign currency exchange volatility;
|
|
•
|
uncertain and changing tax rules, regulations and rates;
|
|
•
|
logistical and communication challenges;
|
|
•
|
potentially adverse changes in laws and regulatory practices;
|
|
•
|
general economic, political and financial conditions in foreign markets;
and
|
|
•
|
exposure to civil or criminal liability under the Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act, trade and export control regulations as well as other international regulations.
|
International risks
and violations of international regulations may negatively affect future operating results or subject us to criminal or civil enforcement
actions. Although we have policies and procedures to monitor legal and regulatory compliance, our employees, subcontractors and
agents could take actions that violate these requirements. As a result, our international risk exposure may be more or less than
the percentage of revenues attributed to our international operations.
We may need to raise additional capital in the future
for working capital, capital expenditures and/or acquisitions, and we may not be able to do so on favorable terms or at all, which
would impair our ability to operate our business or achieve our growth objectives.
To the extent that
cash flow from operations are insufficient to make future investments, make acquisitions or provide needed additional working capital,
we may require additional financing from other sources. Our ability to obtain such additional financing in the future will depend
in part upon prevailing capital market conditions, as well as conditions in our business and our operating results; and those factors
may affect our efforts to arrange additional financing on terms that are satisfactory to us. If adequate funds are not available,
or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to make future investments, take advantage of acquisitions or other
opportunities, or respond to competitive challenges.
Risk Factors Related to Our Common Stock
Our common stock, which is quoted
on the Over the Counter Market, has from time-to-time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations
are likely to continue in the future, and our stockholders may not be able to resell their shares of common stock at or above the
purchase price paid.
The market price of
our common stock may change significantly in response to various factors and events beyond our control, including the following:
|
•
|
the risk factors described in this Item 1A;
|
|
•
|
the significant concentration of ownership of our common stock in the hands
of a small number of institutional investors;
|
|
•
|
a shortfall in operating revenue or net income from that expected by securities
analysts and investors;
|
|
•
|
changes in securities analysts’ estimates of our financial performance
or the financial performance of our competitors or companies in our industry;
|
|
•
|
general conditions in our customers’ industries; and
|
|
•
|
general conditions in the security markets.
|
Some companies that
have volatile market prices for their securities have been subject to security class action suits filed against them. If a suit
were to be filed against us, regardless of the outcome, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s
attention and resources. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Future sales of our common stock may depress our stock
price.
Sales of a substantial
number of shares of our common stock in the public market or otherwise, either by us, a member of management or a major stockholder,
or the perception that these sales could occur, could depress the market price of our common stock and impair our ability to raise
capital through the sale of additional equity securities.
We may issue additional equity securities, which would
lead to dilution of our issued and outstanding stock.
The issuance of additional
common stock or securities convertible into our common stock would result in dilution of the ownership interest in us held by existing
stockholders. We are authorized to issue, without stockholder approval 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.00001
per share, in one or more series, which may give other stockholders dividend, conversion, voting, and liquidation rights, among
other rights, which may be superior to the rights of holders of our common stock. In addition, we are authorized to issue, without
stockholder approval, a significant number of additional shares of our common stock and securities convertible into either common
stock or preferred stock.
The DTC placed a “chill”
on deposits of the Company’s common stock, which may negatively impact an investor’s ability to trade in our common
shares.
The
DTC placed a “chill” on deposits of our common stock. The “chill” does not affect our normal business operations.
However, stockholders with internet brokerage accounts with firms such as Scottrade, TD Ameritrade or E*Trade may not be able to
trade in our common shares through these internet brokers as usual. Because some stockholder may trade through these internet brokers
which clear and settle through the DTC, we believe the “chill” may contribute to limitations on the ability for investors
to purchase our shares. However, if an investor has an account with a full service broker, it will still typically clear and settle
our stock manually, and the investor can typically buy and sell our stock as freely as usual without any DTC imposed restrictions.
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
ITEM 2. Properties
The principal properties of the Company
and its subsidiaries are as follows:
Location
|
|
Description of Facility
|
|
Interest
|
La Porte, Texas
|
|
Headquarters
|
|
Leased
|
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
Various legal actions, claims, and other
contingencies arise in the normal course of our business. Contingencies are recorded in the consolidated financial statements,
or are otherwise disclosed, in accordance with ASC 450-20, “Loss Contingencies”. Specific reserves are provided for
loss contingencies to the extent we conclude that a loss is both probable and estimable. We use a case-by-case evaluation of the
underlying data and update our evaluation as further information becomes known, and the known claims as of this date are as follows:
Civil Action 4:12-CV-00055; Renato Acain
et al vs. International Plant Services LLC et al.
International Plant Services, LLC (IPS)
is a subsidiary of the Company. IPS has been sued in a matter presently pending in United States District Court, Southern District
of Texas, Houston Division by fifty-five (55) Filipino workers alleging violations of RICO and other fiduciary errors. The suit
was initially instituted on May 27, 2011 and removed to U.S. District Court on January 6, 2012. The plaintiff is seeking relief
in the form of unspecified monetary relief. The United States District Court remanded the ACAIN case to the 113
th
District
Court on September 15, 2012. Subsequently, Judge Patricia J. Kerrigan, 113
th
District Court, State of Texas, dismissed
the case. While the Company continues to believe this lawsuit is without merit, the ACAIN plaintiffs have the right to appeal this
dismissal.
Cause No. 2012-23084; Ardent Services, LLC vs. David D. Mathews
and Larry J. Laqua.
The Company is providing the defense of
its employees, Mr. Mathews (President and CEO of the Company) and Mr. Laqua (Vice President of a Company subsidiary), in
a matter involving their former employer, Ardent. Ardent is suing Mr. Mathews and Mr. Laqua in the 234th District Court,
Harris County, Houston, Texas for breach of confidentiality and non-solicitation clauses in certain employment agreements, along
with other breaches of duties allegedly owed. The Company intends to sponsor and fully assist in the defense of Mr. Mathews
and Mr. Laqua. On behalf of Mathews and Laqua, Company legal counsel has filed a motion to dismiss based on a
forum selection clause in a subject agreement. The suit was initially instituted on April 20, 2012. The plaintiff is seeking
relief in the form of injunctive and unspecified monetary relief. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims.
Cause No. 4:13-cv-00505, Michael Rushing, Stephanie Rushing,
Penn Rushing and Florence Rushing v. Texas Gulf Energy, Inc. on behalf of CS Bankers V, LLC, Texas Gulf Fabricators, Inc., David
Mathews, Craig Crawford and Timothy Connolly, United States District Court for the Southern District.
The Company had originally filed against the Rushings for a
Declaratory Judgment alleging they had failed to perform relative to a letter of intent with Texas Gulf Fabricators, Inc., or alternatively,
that the letter of intent was not enforceable. The Company also filed a conversion action against the Rushings for removing
property from a fabrication facility. The Rushing Family filed two separate counterclaims in the underlying state court actions
before removing both actions to federal court in March 2013. On April 13, 2013, the federal court denied jurisdiction and
remanded the matter back to the Texas State Court in the proceedings known as: (i) Cause No. 2013-00543; Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
on behalf of CS Bankers V, LLC and Texas Gulf Fabricators, Inc. VS. Penn Rushing, et al, in the 270
th
Judicial District
Court of Harris County and (ii) Cause No. 2013-004690; Texas Gulf Energy, Inc. vs. Penn Rushing, et al, in the 270
th
Judicial
District Court of Harris County. The Rushings' allegations include fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation, breach
of fiduciary duty, conversion, equitable estoppel and securities violations.
These claims relate to a letter of intent and foreclosure
proceeding on a shop property in Baytown, Texas. The Rushings have not disclosed an amount of damages sought. The Company
is required to pay for the defense of Mr. Mathews, Mr. Crawford and Mr. Connolly. The Company opposes the removal to federal
court. The Company believes the Rushing's claims are without merit and intends to pursue its claims and defenses vigorously.
Based on our knowledge as of the date of
this filing, we believe that any amounts exceeding our recorded accruals should not materially affect our financial position, results
of operations or liquidity. It is the opinion of management that the eventual resolution of the above claims is unlikely to have
a material effect on our financial position or operating results. However, the results of litigation are inherently unpredictable
and the possibility exists that the ultimate resolution of one or more of these matters could result in a material effect on our
financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers
and Corporate Governance.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Set forth below are the names of the
members (“
Directors
”) of our board of directors (the “
Board
”) and executive officers,
their business experience during the last five (5) years, their ages and all positions and offices that they hold with us as
of June 14, 2013.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Karim Ayed
|
|
40
|
|
Director
|
David Matthews
|
|
60
|
|
Director, Chief Executive Officer, President
|
Craig Crawford
|
|
60
|
|
Director, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer
|
Denise Nelson
|
|
49
|
|
Secretary
|
Biographies of Officers and Directors
Karim Ayed.
Mr. Ayed was
appointed as a Director of the Company on October 15, 2012. Mr. Ayed obtained his Bachelor's degree from Bentley College, Boston,
MA. Beginning in April, 2010 to present, he has served as President and CEO of Group EAG Group, which in itself consists of forty-two
(42) companies with world-wide operations on five continents. In this position, he served as Vice-President of International Plant
Services, L.L.C. which became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company in December 2011.
David Mathews.
On December
31, 2011 Mr. Mathews was appointed Chief Executive Officer, effective December 31, 2011, and a Director , effective in January
2012, of the Company. From 2006 until 2009, Mr. Mathews served as a Senior Vice President and Partner at InServ Construction Services,
a division of Willbros Group, Inc. From 2010 until 2011 he served as Vice President, Gulf Coast Operations, or Ardent, LLC. During
2011, Mr. Mathews served as the Chief Executive Officer of International Plant Services, L.L.C., now a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Company.
Craig Crawford.
Mr. Crawford
has served as a Director and as Chief Financial Officer of the Company since November 18, 2011. Effective December 31, 2011 he
was appointed as Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Mr. Crawford has served as President of International Plant Services L.L.C.,
now a subsidiary of the Company, from the beginning of November 2011 to the present. Previously, he served as Operations Director
– Oil and Gas Industry, Mid- and Down-Stream Construction Services for Willbros Group, Inc. from September 2008 until August
2011. Willbros Group, Inc. is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:WG). Prior to that he was Vice-President
– Gulf Coast and North East Turnarounds, Maintenance, and Construction Services for Starcon, Inc. from May 2007 to August
2008. Before that he was President of World Wide Welding, Inc. and General Manager – Mid-Continent and Gulf Coast Business
Unit for TIMEC, Inc. a subsidiary of Transfield Services Limited from February 2006 to May 2007. Transfield Services Limited is
an Australian publicly listed corporation trading on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX:TSE). Beginning in August 2005 until February
2008, he served as Operations Manager and Advisor to the CEO of Systems, Evolution, Inc., an OTCBB-traded company. Concurrently,
Mr. Crawford has served as an officer and director of two other OTC-traded companies, as a Director and President of AppTech, Inc.
(“APCX.PK”)from September 2009 through January 2010 and as a Director and President of W Technologies, Inc. (“WTCG”)
from May 2011 until November 2011.
Denise Nelson.
Ms. Nelson was appointed
to serve as the Secretary of the Company on February 7, 2012. She has over twenty-five (25) years’ experience in office management
and administrative support. From 1990 to 2007, she was Office Manager/Executive Secretary for WorleyParsons Limited. Beginning
in 2007 through 2008, Ms. Nelson was an Executive Assistant with Shippers Stevedoring Co. at the Port of Houston, Texas. From 2008
to 2011, she served as Office Manager for InServ/Willbros Group Inc. In 2011, Ms. Nelson became the Office & Administrative
Manager for International Plant Services, L.L.C., which is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. She shall serve as the
Secretary of the Company until her resignation or replacement by the Company’s Board of Directors.
CORPORATE GOVERANCE AND BOARD MEMBERS
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships by and
between or among the Directors or other officers. None of our Directors and officers are directors or executive officers of any
company that files reports with the SEC except as set forth in the “Biographies of Officers and Directors” section
above.
Election of Directors and Officers
Directors hold office until the next succeeding
annual meeting and the election and/or qualification of their respective successors. Officers are elected annually by our Board
and hold office at the discretion of our Board until their earlier retirement or election and/or qualification of their successors.
Our Bylaws permit our Board to fill any vacancy and such director may serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and the
due election and qualification of their successor.
Legal Proceedings
Unless otherwise indicated, to the knowledge
of the Company after reasonable inquiry, no current Director or executive officer of the Company during the past ten years, has
(i) been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or other minor offenses), (ii) been a party to any judicial
or administrative proceeding (except for any matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement) that resulted in a judgment,
decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, U.S. federal or state
securities laws, or a finding of any violation of U.S. federal or state securities laws, (iii) filed a petition under federal bankruptcy
laws or any state insolvency laws or has had a receiver appointed for the person’s property or (iv) been subject to any judgment,
decree or final order enjoining, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days, the person from engaging in any type of
business practice, acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator,
floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated
person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person,
director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing
any conduct or practice in connection with such activity or engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of
any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws,
(v) been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State
securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended,
or vacated, (vi) been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, (vii) been the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State
judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an
alleged violation of: (a) any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation, (b) any law or regulation respecting
financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement
or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or (c) any
law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity, or (viii) been the subject of,
or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as
defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29)
of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary
authority over its members or persons associated with a member;
except that
in October 2005, Mr. Crawford filed for bankruptcy
in the Southern District of Texas as a protective measure relative to discharged lawsuits against The Project Group, Inc., a company
which Mr. Crawford had served as President and CEO.
Promoters and Control Persons
None.
Committees of our Board of Directors
As of this date, the Company has not appointed
an audit committee, compensation committee or nominating committee. Our Board does not believe that it is necessary to have such
committees because it believes the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by the Board. We have not adopted any
procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board.
Board Leadership and Role in Risk Oversight
Our Board recognizes that the leadership
structure and combination or separation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman roles is driven by the needs of the Company
at any point in time. The Company has no policy requiring combination or separation of leadership roles and our governing documents
do not mandate a particular structure. This has allowed our Board the flexibility to establish the most appropriate structure for
the Company at any given time.
The Board oversees our shareholders’
interest in the long-term health and the overall success of the Company and its financial strengths. The full Board is actively
involved in overseeing risk management for the Company. It does so in part through discussion and review of our business, financial
and corporate governance practices and procedures. The Board, as a whole, reviews the risks confronted by the Company with respect
to its operations and financial condition, establishes limits of risk tolerance with respect to the Company’s activities
and ensures adequate property and liability insurance coverage.
Meetings of the Board and Stockholder
Communications
Our Board conducted all of its business
and approved all corporate action during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and from January 1, 2013 to present, by the unanimous
written consent of its members, in the absence of formal board meetings. Holders of the Company’s securities can send communications
to the Board via mail or telephone to the Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices. The Company has not yet
established a policy with respect to Board members’ attendance at the annual meetings.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires
our officers and Directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports
of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, Directors and greater than ten percent shareholders are required
by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on a review of the copies
of such forms furnished to us, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2012, all such reports were filed in a timely
manner.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Policy
We have not adopted a Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer
or controller, or persons performing similar functions in that our sole officer and director serve in these capacities.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
Not applicable, as we do not presently
have an audit committee.
Director Independence
Quotations for our Common Stock are entered
on the OTC Bulletin Board and OTC Markets inter-dealer quotation systems, which do not have director independence requirements.
For purposes of determining director independence, we have applied the definitions set out in NASDAQ Rule 4200(a)(15). Under NASDAQ
Rule 4200(a)(15), a director is not considered to be independent if he or she is also an executive officer or employee of the corporation.
Presently, we have no independent directors.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The following table sets forth information
concerning the compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 of the principal executive officer, in addition
to our two most highly compensated officers whose annual compensation exceeded $100,000.
Name and Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
All other
compensa-
tion
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David D. Mathews
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
221,314
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
*
|
|
$
|
273,414
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
$
|
72,800
|
|
Craig Crawford
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
47,423
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
132,418
|
**
|
|
$
|
204,841
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
13,215
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
27,084
|
**
|
|
$
|
40,299
|
|
Denise Nelson, Secretary
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
74,520
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
79,520
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Magner ***/****
President
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pamela Stewart ***/*****
Secretary
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
*
|
Auto Allowance
|
|
|
**
|
This amount was paid to Mr. Crawford’s nominee, Fortenberry Service, Inc,
|
|
|
***
|
During the 2011 fiscal year, Mr. Magner and Ms. Stewart earned 250,000 and 150,000 restricted shares of Common Stock, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
****
|
Mr. Magner resigned as President on December 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*****
|
Ms. Stewart resigned as Secretary on February 7, 2012.
|
|
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal
Year End
There were no outstanding equity awards
for the Company as of December 31, 2012. Additionally, there were no outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2012 for any
of the named executive officers of the Company.
Employment Agreements
As of December 30, 2011, we engaged (i)
David Mathews as our Chief Executive Officer and (ii) Craig Crawford as our Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
President pursuant to written employment agreements. Effective January 1, 2012 the Company entered into employment agreements with
both David Mathews and Craig Crawford (the “
Employment Agreements
”). Each of the Employment Agreements has an
initial term of three (3) years, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the terms therein.
Base Salary, Bonus and Other Compensation
.
Mr. Crawford’s base salary is $40,000 in addition to $135,000 paid to his personal designee. Mr. Mathews’ base salary
shall be $240,000 per year, which base salaries will be reviewed at least annually. In addition to base salary, the officers are
entitled to receive a quarterly performance bonus based on the officer’s performance for the previous quarter. The officers
are also eligible to receive paid vacation, and participate in health and other benefit plans and will be reimbursed for reasonable
and necessary business expenses.
Equity Compensation.
In connection
with the engagement of Mr. Crawford as an officer, Mr. Crawford was awarded an amount of 4,710,000 shares (the “
Crawford
Restricted Shares
”) of Common Stock. The Crawford Restricted Shares vest as follows: (i) 1,570,000 of the Crawford Restricted
Shares on January 15, 2012; (ii) 1,570,000 of the Crawford Restricted Shares on January 15, 2013; and (iii) 1,570,000 of the Crawford
Restricted Shares on January 15, 2014. In the event of a change of control or sale of the Company, all of the Crawford Restricted
Shares shall immediately vest and be issued by Company immediately prior to such change of control or sale. Also, in connection
with the appointment of Mr. Mathews as CEO, Mr. Mathews was awarded 15,667,806 shares (the “
Mathews Restricted Shares
”)
of Common Stock. The Mathews Restricted Shares vest as follows: (i) 5,222,602 of the Mathews Restricted Shares on January 15, 2012;
(ii) 5,222,602 of the Mathews Restricted Shares on January 15, 2013; and (iii) 5,222,602 of the Mathews Restricted Shares on January
15, 2014. In the event of a change of control or sale of the Company, all of the Mathews Restricted Shares shall immediately vest
and be issued by the Company immediately prior to such change of control or sale.
Severance Compensation
. If Mr. Crawford’s
or Mr. Mathews’ employment is terminated for any reason, other than for cause, each will be entitled to receive his or her
base salary for the period representing the remainder of the term of the employment agreement. In the event of an early termination
of the employment period because of the voluntary resignation, total disability or death of the Executive, or termination of the
executive’s employment for cause, the executive, or his estate in the event of his death, will receive his base salary through
the date of employment termination.
2012 Director Compensation
For the year ended December 31, 2012, none
of the members of our Board received compensation for his service as a director. We do not currently have an established policy
to provide compensation to members of our Board for their services in that capacity. We intend to develop such a policy in the
near future.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Background and Compensation Philosophy
Our Board has historically determined the
compensation to be paid to the executive officers based on the Company’s financial and operating performance and prospects,
the level of compensation paid to similarly situated executives in comparably sized companies and contributions made by the officers
to the success of the Company.
Our Board has not adopted or established
a formal policy or procedure for determining the amount of compensation paid to our executive officers. No pre-established metrics
have been used by our Board in determining the compensation or our executive officers. Mr. Ayed, Mr. Crawford and Mr. Mathews are
involved in the Board’s deliberations regarding executive compensation and provide recommendations with respect to their
compensation.
As our executive leadership and Board grow,
our Board may decide to form a compensation committee charged with the oversight of executive compensation plans, policies and
programs.
Elements of Compensation
We provide our executive officers with
a base salary and an incentive bonus structure to compensate them for services rendered during the year. Our policy of compensating
our executives with a cash salary and incentive bonus has served the Company well in attracting and retaining key personnel.
Equity Incentive and Benefit Plans
The Company has no stock option, retirement,
pension or profit-sharing programs for the benefit of its directors, officers or other employees; however our Board may recommend
the adoption of one or more such programs in the future.
Deferred Compensation
We do not provide our executives the opportunity
to defer receipt of annual compensation.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management
The following tables set forth certain
information concerning the number of shares of our capital stock owned beneficially as of April 25, 2012 by: (i) each person (including
any group) known to us to own more than five percent (5%) of any class or Series of our voting securities, (ii) our directors,
and our named executive officers.
Unless otherwise indicated, the stockholders
listed possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown.
Title of Series
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
|
|
Percentage
of
Class of
Stock(1)
|
|
|
Percentage
of
all Voting
Rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Karim Ayed
Director
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
14,705,882
Direct
|
|
|
|
22.64
|
%
|
|
|
4.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
David D. Mathews
Chief Executive Officer and President, and a Director
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
15,667,806
Direct
|
|
|
|
24.12
|
%
|
|
|
4.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Craig Crawford
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and a Director
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
4,710,000
Indirect
|
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
|
1.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Denise Nelson
Secretary
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
100,000
Direct
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
All Directors and Executive
Officers; as a Group
(4 persons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,183,688
|
|
|
|
54.16
|
%
|
|
|
9.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
Karim Ayed, Director
|
|
|
(2)
(3)
|
|
|
|
966667
Direct
|
|
|
|
33.35
|
%
|
|
|
26.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
David D. Mathews; Chief
Executive Officer and a Director
|
|
|
(2)
(3)
|
|
|
|
966,666
Direct
|
|
|
|
33.30
|
%
|
|
|
26.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
Karim Ayed, Director
|
|
|
(2)
(4)
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
Direct
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Mohamed Noureddine Ayed
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
14,705,883
Direct
|
|
|
|
22.64
|
%
|
|
|
4.02
|
%
|
Common Stock
|
|
Karim Ayed
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
14,705,882
Direct
|
|
|
|
22.64
|
%
|
|
|
4.02
|
%
|
Common Stock
|
|
David D. Mathews
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
15,667,806
Direct
|
|
|
|
24.12
|
%
|
|
|
4.03
|
%
|
Common Stock
|
|
Craig Crawford
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
4,710,000
Direct
|
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
|
1.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
Mohamed Noureddine Ayed
|
|
|
(2)
(3)
|
|
|
|
966,667
Direct
|
|
|
|
33.35
|
%
|
|
|
26.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
Karen Ayed
|
|
|
(2)
(3)
|
|
|
|
966,667
Direct
|
|
|
|
33.35
|
%
|
|
|
26.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
David Mathews
|
|
|
(2)
(3)
|
|
|
|
966,667
Direct
|
|
|
|
33.30
|
%
|
|
|
26.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
Mohamed Noureddine Ayed
|
|
|
(2)
(4)
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
Direct
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
Karim Ayed
|
|
|
(2)
(4)
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
Direct
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Based on 64,947,025 shares of Common Stock, with Voting Rights of 64,947,025; 2,900,000
shares of Series A Convertible Preferred stock, with Voting Rights of 290,000,000; and 10,000,000 shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock, with Voting Rights of 10,000,000, all of which were issued and outstanding as of June 14, 2013.
Under Rule 13d-3, certain shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons
share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares). In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a
person if the person has the right to acquire the shares (for example, upon exercise of an option) within 60 days of the date
as of which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares
outstanding is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially owned by such person (and only such person) by reason of
these acquisition rights. As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in this table does not
necessarily reflect the person’s actual ownership or voting power with respect to the number of shares of Common and
Preferred stock actually outstanding on June 14, 2013.
|
|
(2)
|
The address for each shareholder is 1602 Old Underwood Road, La Porte, TX 77571.
|
|
(3)
|
Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has Voting Rights of 100-to-1 relative to shares Common Stock
|
|
(4)
|
Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock has Voting Rights of 1-to-1 relative to shares Common Stock
|
Item13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.
Related Party Transactions
The Company’s two largest shareholders,
Mohammed Noureddine Ayed and Karim Ayed, the latter also being a Director of the Company, as of December 31, 2012, maintain a 74.8%
voting control of the Company. The Company utilizes corporations owed by the two majority shareholders that provide certain services
to the company, which include the following:
Management believes that the amounts paid
for these services are at or below those rates that would be payable to unrelated third parties and that our shareholder interests
are best served by continuing to use these services provided by companies who are related parties.
The total due to these related parties
is $204,561 and $1,430,773 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for services performed by affiliates of the Company.
The Company primarily utilizes a foreign corporation affiliated by common ownership for testing, recruiting,
mobilization and training the foreign workforce for construction projects. The Company pays $1.40 per hour billed by these employees
for all of these services. Amounts payable to the related party as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $19,639 and $77,396, respectively.
The Company utilizes a United States LLC
affiliated by common ownership for some of its hotels and lodging facilities to accommodate its construction workers. The Company
charges clients $65 per diem for workers on location and in turn pays $40 to the related company for this service. The Company
also has a one year lease for its operating facilities from this affiliate that are renewed annually. Amounts payable to the related
party of $2,278 and $997,120 are included in the balances as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and
Services.
The following
table presents fees for audit services provided by LBB & Associates Ltd., LLP and other services provided by LBB &
Associates Ltd., LLP Hammack CPAs and CHG Consulting Services for the fiscal years 2012 and 2011.
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
12/31/12
|
|
|
12/31/11
|
|
Audit Fees (a)
|
|
$
|
102,215.00
|
|
|
$
|
34,616.00
|
|
Audit Related Fees (b)
|
|
$
|
96,680.00
|
|
|
$
|
53,269.33
|
|
Tax Fees (c)
|
|
$
|
29,322.10
|
|
|
$
|
41,550.98
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$
|
228,217.10
|
|
|
$
|
129,436.31
|
|
|
(a)
|
Audit fees consist of fees for the audit of our Company's financial statements included in our Company's annual report and
review of financial statements included in our Company's quarterly reports.
|
|
(b)
|
Audit-related fees include audit and diligence of our Company's accounting and financial reports, including consulting fees
regarding Company acquisitions.
|
(c ) Tax fees consist of
fees for the preparation of federal and state income tax returns.
PART IV
ITEM 15. Exhibits and
Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules
See Index to Consolidated
Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.
(b)
Exhibits
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Location
|
2.1
|
|
Share Exchange Agreement between the Company, International Plant Services, L.L.C. and the Equity Holders of International Plant Services, LLC dated December 30, 2011.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Share Exchange Agreement between the Company, International Plant Services, L.L.C. and the Equity Holders of International Plant Services, LLC dated December 31, 2011.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on January 6, 2012.
|
2.3
|
|
Share Exchange Agreement between the Company, Texas Gulf Oil & Gas, Inc. and the Equity Holders of Texas Gulf Oil & Gas, Inc. dated January 27, 2012.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Purchase Agreement between the Company and Timothy J. Connolly dated January 27, 2012.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Purchase, Sale and Share Exchange Agreement between the Company, Fishbone Solutions, Ltd. and the Equity Holders of Fishbone Solutions, Ltd. dated February 3, 2012.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 9, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Share Exchange Agreement dated August 31, 2012, by and among Texas Gulf Energy, Incorporated, Texas Gulf Oil & Gas, Inc. and Corporate Strategies, LLC.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 18, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Agreement Regarding Redemption of Membership Interest in CS Bankers V, LLC and 100% of the Stock of Texas Gulf Fabricators, Inc., dated December 28, 2012, by and among Texas Gulf Energy, Incorporated, Texas Gulf Fabricators, Inc., CS Bankers V, LLC and Eagle Real Estate Holding, LLC.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 3, 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Company
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on March 21, 2008, as subsequently amended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of the Company
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on March 21, 2008, as subsequently amended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on October 8, 2009.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Schedule 14C Definitive Information Statement filed with the SEC on September 18, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on October 8, 2010.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 8, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on March 29, 2010.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfiled with the SEC on May 17, 2010 as subsequently amended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on March 29, 2010.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfiled with the SEC on May 17, 2010 as subsequently amended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on March 29, 2010.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfiled with the SEC on May 17, 2010 as subsequently amended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on August 4, 2011.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 14, 2011.
|
3.9
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Designations of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock dated November 22, 2011.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on January 9, 2012.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 8, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
Certificate of Correction filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on February 3, 2012.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 8, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Convertible Promissory Note issued by the Company in favor of Karim Ayed dated December 30, 2011
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Convertible Promissory Note issued by the Company in favor of Mohamed Noreddine Ayed dated December 30, 2011
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Craig Crawford dated January 1, 2012.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and David Mathews dated January 1, 2012.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Employment Agreement between Texas Gulf Oil & Gas, Inc. and Timothy J. Connolly dated January 27, 2012.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Employment Agreement between Texas Gulf Oil & Gas, Inc. and Damon Wagley dated January 27, 2012.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 1, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Convertible Promissory Note issued by the Company in favor of the Equity Holders of Fishbone Solutions, Ltd. dated February 3, 2012.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 9, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Convertible Promissory Note issued by the Company in favor of Equity Holders of Fishbone Solutions, Ltd. dated February 3, 2012.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 9, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of the Company
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to the Company’s Annual Report on From 10-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Provided herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certifications of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Provided herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
|
|
Provided herewith
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
|
|
Provided herewith
|
101
|
|
The following financial information from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Provided herewith
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these consolidated financial statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Note 1 – Restatement of Financial Information
Texas Gulf Energy, Incorporated
(“Company”) has restated its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 to correct
its accounting for errors that occurred during this reporting period. This restatement is necessary due to material
weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls that resulted in accounting errors that occurred when the Company failed
to reconcile certain accounts. An account analysis was not adequately performed and not properly verified and there was an
insufficient review by supervisory personnel during the accounting closing process. The effected accounts were
“Prepaid
Expenses - Credit Cards,”
“Accrued Revenue,”
“Advance to Global
NuTech, Inc.,”
and
“Accrued Expenses.”
As part of the restatement process resulting from our
review of such errors, we assessed which items should be corrected in our previously issued financial statements. The
aggregate adjustments in our financial statements decreased net income by $305,710 for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Additionally, total assets and total liabilities decreased by $609,786 and $137,377 respectively.
Impact of the restatement
Impact on Consolidated Statement of
Operations
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
As
Reported ($)
|
|
|
Adjustment ($)
|
|
|
As
Restated ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
36,349,545
|
|
|
|
(305,710
|
)
|
|
|
36,043,835
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
27,806,005
|
|
|
|
(14,553
|
)
|
|
|
27,791,452
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
8,543,540
|
|
|
|
(291,157
|
)
|
|
|
8,252,383
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
8,634,185
|
|
|
|
351,476
|
|
|
|
8,985,661
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(90,645
|
)
|
|
|
(642,633
|
)
|
|
|
(733,278
|
)
|
Income (loss) before income tax
|
|
|
159,320
|
|
|
|
(642,633
|
)
|
|
|
(483,313
|
)
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
(30,403
|
)
|
|
|
170,224
|
|
|
|
139,821
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
128,917
|
|
|
|
(472,409
|
)
|
|
|
(343,492
|
)
|
Impact on Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
As
Reported ($)
|
|
|
Adjustment ($)
|
|
|
As
Restated ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
6,812,630
|
|
|
|
(305,710
|
)
|
|
|
6,506,920
|
|
Federal income tax receivable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
115,224
|
|
|
|
115,224
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,181,511
|
|
|
|
(419,300
|
)
|
|
|
762,211
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
8,518,447
|
|
|
|
(609,786
|
)
|
|
|
7,908,661
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
10,892,415
|
|
|
|
(609,786
|
)
|
|
|
10,282,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,441,322
|
|
|
|
(88,278
|
)
|
|
|
1,353,044
|
|
Due to related parties, net
|
|
|
104,405
|
|
|
|
100,156
|
|
|
|
204,561
|
|
Federal income taxes payable
|
|
|
149,255
|
|
|
|
(149,255
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
5,844,355
|
|
|
|
(137,377
|
)
|
|
|
5,706,978
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,156,481
|
|
|
|
(137,377
|
)
|
|
|
7,019,104
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
514,123
|
|
|
|
(472,409
|
)
|
|
|
41,714
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
3,735,934
|
|
|
|
(472,409
|
)
|
|
|
3,263,525
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
10,892,415
|
|
|
|
(609,786
|
)
|
|
|
10,282,629
|
|
Impact on Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
As
Reported ($)
|
|
|
Adjustment ($)
|
|
|
As
Restated ($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
128,917
|
|
|
|
(472,409
|
)
|
|
|
(343,492
|
)
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,791,697
|
)
|
|
|
(305,710
|
)
|
|
|
(1,485,987
|
)
|
Federal income tax receivable
|
|
|
(305,745
|
)
|
|
|
(264,479
|
)
|
|
|
(570,224
|
)
|
Prepaid expense and other current assets
|
|
|
(403,605
|
)
|
|
|
(419,300
|
)
|
|
|
15,695
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(1,605,049
|
)
|
|
|
(88,278
|
)
|
|
|
(1,693,327
|
)
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
(1,376,630
|
)
|
|
|
100,156
|
|
|
|
(1,276,474
|
)
|
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Business
–
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc. (a Nevada corporation) (“TGE” or “the Company”) is located in La Porte, Texas and
is in the business of providing craftsmen, architects and engineers in the energy construction sector. Approximately seventy percent
of the revenue is from new construction and the remainder is from repair and maintenance services. The work is generally performed
under time and material priced contracts, based on hours worked plus mobilization fees at the outset of the projects. The lengths
of the Company’s contracts vary but are typically less than one year.
On December 30, 2011, International Plant
Services, LLC (“IPS”) entered into a merger with Global NuTech, Inc.(”Global NuTech”), a Nevada corporation,
pursuant to which IPS and Global NuTech have set forth certain terms relating to a merger transaction between the parties with
IPS becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of Global NuTech. The transaction was recorded as a reverse merger whereby IPS was considered
to be the accounting acquirer as its shareholders retained control of Global NuTech after the exchange, although Global NuTech
is the legal parent company. The share exchange was treated as a recapitalization of IPS, and IPS (and its historical financial
statements) is the continuing entity for financial reporting purposes. In the first quarter of 2012, Global NuTech changed its
name to Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Fishbone Solutions, Inc., International Plant Services,
L.L.C., NuTech Energy, Inc., Texas Gulf Energy Industrial Services Inc. and Texas Gulf Specialty Services, Inc. All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
–
The Company considers all highly liquid short-term instruments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of
purchase to be cash equivalents.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost
of businesses acquired over the fair value of their net assets at the dates of acquisition. Goodwill is reviewed at least annually
to assess the carrying value of goodwill associated with each of its distinct business units that comprise its business segments
of the company to determine if impairment in value has occurred.
Revenue Recognition
–
Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services are performed, sales price is determinable, and
collection is reasonably assured. Services performed and not yet billed are included in accounts receivable as unbilled revenue.
Mobilization fees are recognized upon the mobilization of the labor and the labor revenue is recognized at the unit price of labor
hours worked. Per diem revenue is recorded in a similar fashion for meals, travel and lodging.
Contract costs include all labor costs,
mobilization costs, travel, per diem for travel meals and lodging, and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such
as indirect labor, supplies, tools and repairs. General and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs and
estimated earnings in excess of billings are recorded as current assets and billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
are recorded as a liability.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (CONTINUED)
Accounts Receivable
–
The Company extends unsecured credit to its customers, which is non- interest bearing. Accounts receivable are recorded when invoices
are issued and are presented in the balance sheet net of allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company establishes an allowance
for doubtful accounts to ensure accounts receivable are not overstated due to accounts that are not collectible. The Company maintains
a bad debt reserve based on a variety of factors, including the age of the receivable, payment history, trends and financial condition
of customers, macroeconomic conditions, and significant one-time events.
The Company determines the allowance based
upon a review of outstanding receivables, historical write-off experience and existing economic conditions. Normal contract retainers
are not typically used for this company. Receivables past due over 90 days are considered delinquent and reviewed individually
for collectability. After all means of collection have been exhausted delinquent, receivables are written off. Management has determined
that the allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is $388,227 and $388,227, respectively. Bad debt expense
for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is $- and $189,744, respectively.
Property and Equipment
–
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Improvements or betterments of a permanent nature are capitalized. Expenditures for
maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The cost of assets retired or otherwise disposed of and the related
accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts in the year of disposal. Gains or losses resulting from property disposals
are credited or charged to operations in the year of disposal.
The Company provides for depreciation using the straight-line
method over the following estimated useful lives of assets:
|
|
Years of Life
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5-10
|
|
Software
|
|
|
3
|
|
Computer and equipment
|
|
|
5-10
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
5-7
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
3-30
|
|
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
–
In accordance with Financial Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) 360,
Property,
Plant and Equipment
, long-lived assets to be held and used are reviewed for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such asset may not be recoverable. The determination of recoverability
of long-lived assets is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset or its disposition.
Measurement of an impairment loss for long-lived assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the fair value of the
asset. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or net realizable value.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (CONTINUED)
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
– Under FASB ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
, we are permitted to elect to measure financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value, with the change in fair value recorded in earnings. We elected not to measure any eligible
items using the fair value option. Consistent with the Fair Value Measurement Topic of the FASB ASC 820, we implemented guidelines
relating to the disclosure of our methodology for periodic measurement of our assets and liabilities recorded at fair market value.
Fair value is defined as the price that
would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. A three-tier fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy
gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements)
and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). These tiers include:
|
·
|
Level
1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets;
|
|
·
|
Level
2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable such as quoted
prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not
active; and
|
|
·
|
Level
3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions,
such as valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
|
Our Level 1 assets primarily include our
cash and cash equivalents (including our money market accounts). Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources
for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. The carrying amount of accounts receivable, accounts payable,
accrued liabilities, lines of credit, and convertible debt approximate their fair value due to the immediate or short-term maturities
of these financial instruments.
Advertising Charges
–
The Company charges advertising costs to expense as incurred. Advertising costs amounted to $73,517 and $2,993 for the years ended
December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and are included with general and administrative expenses in the accompanying financial
statements.
Income Taxes
– The
Company is taxed as a corporation effective January 1, 2007. The company uses the liability method in accounting for income taxes,
whereby tax rates are applied to cumulative temporary differences based on when and how they are expected to affect future tax
returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for tax rate changes in the year the changes are enacted. The realizability
of the deferred assets are evaluated annually and a valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that the deferred
tax assets will not give rise to future benefits in the company’s tax returns. In prior year’s the entity was taxed
as a partnership whereby income was passed through to the stockholders and the stockholders paid any income tax.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (CONTINUED)
As part of the process of preparing its
financial statements, the Company is required to estimate its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This
process requires the Company to estimate its actual current tax liability and to assess temporary differences resulting from differing
book versus tax treatment of items, such as deferred revenue, compensation and benefits expense and depreciation. These temporary
differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within the Company’s statements of financial
condition. Significant management judgment is required in determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, its deferred
tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against its net deferred tax assets. In assessing the realization
of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets
will be realized and, when necessary, valuation allowances are established. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets
is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible.
Management considers the level of historical taxable income, scheduled reversals of deferred taxes, projected future taxable income
and tax planning strategies that can be implemented by the Company in making this assessment. If actual results differ from these
estimates or the Company adjusts these estimates in future periods, the Company may need to adjust its valuation allowance, which
could materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Tax contingencies can involve complex issues
and may require an extended period of time to resolve. Changes in the level of annual pre-tax income can affect the Company’s
overall effective tax rate. Significant management judgment is required in determining the Company’s provision for income
taxes, its deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against its net deferred tax assets. Furthermore,
the Company’s interpretation of complex tax laws may impact its recognition and measurement of current and deferred income
taxes.
Dividends
– Cash distributions
are made to stockholders in the form of dividends, net of federal withholding. The Company can pay dividends to its shareholders
at its own discretion upon approval by the Board of Directors.
Use of Estimates
–
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States
of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management believes that these estimates
and assumptions provide a reasonable basis for the fair presentation of the financial statements.
Foreign Currency
- Transaction
gains and losses arising from exchange rate fluctuation on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency
are included in the consolidated statements of operations. The financial statements of foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency
is the local currency are translated into United States dollars using period-end rates of exchange for assets and liabilities and
average rates of exchange for the period for revenues and expenses.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (CONTINUED)
Stock based compensation
The Company accounts for share-based expense and activity in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, which establishes accounting for equity instruments exchanged for services. Under this provision,
share-based compensation costs are measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and are recognized
as an expense over both the employee and non-employee’s requisite service period, generally the vesting period of the equity
grant.
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using
the Black-Scholes valuation model. Key input assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the exercise
price of the award, expected option term, expected volatility of the stock over the option’s expected term, risk-free interest
rate over the option’s expected term, and the expected annual dividend yield. The Company believes that the valuation technique
and approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of the stock options
granted.
Earnings per share
The Company has adopted FASB ASC Topic 260, which provides for
the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic and diluted loss per share has been calculated based on the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts previously reported in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 have been reclassified to conform to the 2012 presentation. These reclassifications
have no impact on net income.
Recent Pronouncements
-
The Company is not aware
of any new accounting pronouncements that would have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 3 – Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment consist of the following at December
31, 2012 and 2011:
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
$
|
33,729
|
|
|
$
|
25,035
|
|
Software
|
|
|
1,651,937
|
|
|
|
51,898
|
|
Computers and equipment
|
|
|
79,971
|
|
|
|
89,785
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
33,502
|
|
|
|
265,919
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
145,378
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
244,358
|
|
|
|
218,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
2,188,875
|
|
|
|
650,895
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(757,134
|
)
|
|
|
(459,737
|
)
|
Total property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
1,431,741
|
|
|
$
|
191,158
|
|
Depreciation for the year ended December
31, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $520,944 and $86,375 respectively, and is included with administrative and general expenses in the
accompanying financial statements.
NOTE 4 – Goodwill
At December 31, 2012 and 2011, goodwill totaled $862,889 and
$0, respectively. The increase in goodwill during 2012 is attributable to the acquisition of Fishbone Solutions LTD (as described
in Note 9). The excess purchase price over the value of the net tangible assets of Fishbone Solutions LTD was recorded to goodwill.
The goodwill has been allocated to the Fishbone Solutions reporting segment and is included in other assets.
NOTE 5 – Convertible Notes and Notes Payable
Fishbone Notes
On February 3, 2012 the Company issued
convertible notes totaling $1,283,126 and promissory notes totaling $216,874 associated with the purchase of Fishbone Solutions,
Inc. (“Fishbone”), on the closing date of the transaction, the Company issued individually to the equity-holders
of Fishbone, promissory notes (also referred to herein as the “Notes”), in the proportional principal amounts directed
by the equity-holders, in the aggregate amount of $1,500,000 together with interest thereon at the rate of .19% per annum, the
principal and accrued interest thereon being convertible into shares of our common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (“Common
Stock”), at $0.12 per share, with the issue and registration of such restricted Common Stock being subject to Rule 144 of
the Securities Act of 1933 and any other pertinent rules of law regarding restricted securities.
Such equity-holders will be limited to
selling stock converted from the Notes as follows:
|
(a)
|
zero percent (0%) until the one year anniversary; (February 3, 2013)
|
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
|
(b)
|
no more than fifteen percent (15%) of the principal amount and accrued interest of each Note from
the one year anniversary date (February 3, 2013) until the day before the two year anniversary;
|
|
(c)
|
an additional fifteen percent (15%) from the two year anniversary (February 13, 2014) until the
day before the three year anniversary of the Notes; (February 13, 2015) and
|
|
(d)
|
the entire remaining balance of accrued interest and principal thereon becoming due and the stock
converted from the Notes become unrestricted for sale on the three year anniversary of the Notes, at which time all such limitations
on sale will be lifted.
|
Notwithstanding, the equity-holders must
commence any conversion process of any remaining balance on the Notes no later than the third year anniversary (February 3, 2015).
The Notes may also become due and subject to rights of conversion in the event of a liquidation event or change of control. The
convertible notes of $1,283,126 are outstanding at December 31, 2012.
Notes Payable
The Company assumed a loan with a financial
institution of $114,047 that was paid off during 2012.
The Company assumed a loan due to a former
shareholder of Fishbone that matures in June 2013. The amount assumed was $422,529 and is guaranteed by Fishbone. The balance outstanding
at December 31, 2012 is $233,135.
NOTE 6 - Lines of Credit
On February 29, 2012, the Company entered
into a $3 million receivables purchase agreement with a merchant bank. Under the agreement, the Company can sell all rights, title
and interests in their accounts receivables for the total amount of the receivable invoices, less a discounting factor of 15% to
the factoring company. The factoring company will remit a rebate to the Company of an amount between 14.30% and 10% of the receivable
invoice amounts depending on how long it takes the factoring company to collect the receivable. The sooner the amount is collected,
the greater the rebate received by the Company. If after 90 days it isn’t collected, the Company agreed to repurchase the
receivables for $.90 for each $1.00 invoiced. The Company retains the right to repurchase any of its invoices at any time from
the merchant bank. The balance on the purchase agreement was $848,261 at December 31, 2012 and $2,053,937 was available at December
31, 2012. This agreement can be terminated at any time by the Company.
On September 14, 2012, the Company entered
into a $1 million receivable purchase agreement with a merchant bank. Under the agreement, the Company can sell all rights, title
and interests in their accounts receivables for the total amount of the receivable invoices, less a discounting factor of 15% to
the factoring company. The factoring company will remit a rebate to the Company of an amount between 10% and 14.30% of the receivable
invoice amounts depending on how long it takes the factoring company to collect the receivable. The sooner the amount is collected,
the greater the rebate received by the Company. If after 90 days it isn’t collected, the Company agreed to repurchase the
receivables for $.90 for each $1.00 invoiced. The Company retains the right to repurchase any of its invoices at any time from
the merchant bank. The balance on the purchase agreement was $816,613 and $36,813 was available at December 31, 2012. This agreement
can be terminated at any time by the Company.
In November 2012, the Company renewed its
$1,000,000 line of credit with Patriot Bank through May 9, 2013. The line of credit bears interest at 6.5% or the Wall Street Journal
prime rate plus 2%. Accrued and unpaid interest on the revolving note is due and payable monthly in arrears and all amounts outstanding
under the revolving note are due and payable on May 9, 2013. The balance on the revolving line of credit is $958,678 at December
31, 2012.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 7 - Stock Based Compensation
The stock based compensation cost that has been charged against
income by the Company was $1,087,452 and $-0- for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for common stock awarded
by the Company. The Company entered into employment agreements with the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and other
key employees and granted 28,477,806 restricted shares vesting over 36 months. The fair value of the common stock on the date of
grant was $0.09 per share or $2,563,002.
During 2012, the Company issued 11,892,602 common shares per
the vesting of the 28,477,806 restricted shares vesting over 36 months to the chief executive officer, chief financial officer,
and other key employees.
On July 5, 2012 the Company granted 100,000 common shares to
a consultant for services valued at $17,000 or $0.17 per share.
NOTE 8 - Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings per share includes no dilution
and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
for the periods presented. The calculation of basic earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes the
weighted average of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could
share in the earnings of an entity, such as convertible preferred stock or convertible debt. Dilutive securities existed for the
year ended December 31, 2012 in the form of convertible preferred stock series A, and B and convertible debt.
NOTE 9 – Segment Information
The Company has four reportable segments,
Texas Gulf Oil & Gas, Inc. International Plant Services, LLC, TGE Electrical & Instrumentation, and Fishbone Solutions,
Inc. segments.
Texas Gulf Oil & Gas, Inc.
The primary assets of Texas Gulf Oil &
Gas, Inc. include leases, options and interests in nineteen (19) oil wells throughout the Austin Chalk near Luling, Texas, as well
as options on wells to be drilled or re-entered in three leases identified as the Tilmon, Lay, and Rodenberg. Texas Gulf Oil &
Gas, Inc. also provides well services on its own crude oil wells as well as to other companies and individual oil well owners.
This line of business was sold on September 6, 2012 and Texas Gulf Energy, Inc. has retained a nine (9)% equity interest. It will
no longer be reported as a separate segment.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
International Plant Services, LLC
Our International Plant Services, LLC segment
provides turnkey and specialty construction services to a wide range of industrial and energy sector clients. Our scope of services
includes managing and executing major capital and turnaround projects, the provision of project management personnel, and other
construction resources, like project planners/schedulers, engineers, welders, fitters and millwrights. A portion of the engineers
and skilled craftsmen (welders, fitters, millwrights and electricians) are guest workers working with visas in the United States.
These services are provided for projects of varying complexities, schedule durations, and budgets. Our project experience and expertise
includes turnarounds, retrofits, modifications and expansions to existing facilities as well as the construction of new facilities
in the refinery, petrochemical, mining and power industries.
TGE Electrical & Instrumentation
Services
TGE Electrical & Instrumentation is
a business unit of TGE that provides specialty electrical services, including new construction, maintenance, turnarounds, commissioning,
skid/module construction, inspection services, troubleshooting, project management. Services for process industry include capital
project construction, multi-year programs, maintenance services programs, calibration, commissioning and startup services. The
support services include constructability reviews, cost estimating and budget development, project and construction management.
Fishbone Solutions, Inc.
Fishbone Solutions, Inc. provides project
management services, experienced management personnel and systems to ensure repeatable performance in the following services: program
and project management, planning and scheduling, field design and drafting, P&ID updates, CAD work for fabrication, SCOPE Software
for field planning, subcontract management, project management, project controls, material procurement and management, and construction
related administration functions. We use enhanced digital photography in our SCOPE Development Process and we supply high quality
teams to define, schedule and manage projects from "cradle to grave" nationwide.
Fishbone Solutions, LTD was acquired by
the Company on February 3, 2012 and the name was changed to Fishbone Solutions, Inc. effective March 28, 2012.
Segment revenue is as follows: (in $000’s)
Year ended December 31, 2012 (restated):
|
|
Texas
Gulf
Oil & Gas
|
|
|
International
Plant
Services
|
|
|
TGE Electrical
&
Instrumentation
Services
|
|
|
Fishbone
Solutions
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
23,887
|
|
|
$
|
1,840
|
|
|
$
|
5,403
|
|
|
$
|
4,884
|
|
|
$
|
36,043
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(271
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,081
|
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
|
$
|
(3,865
|
)
|
|
$
|
(343
|
)
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
7,371
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
3,601
|
|
|
$
|
(912
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,282
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2011
|
|
Texas Gulf
Oil & Gas
|
|
|
International
Plant
Services
|
|
|
TGE Electrical
&
Instrumentation
Services
|
|
|
Fishbone
Solutions
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
30,884
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
30,884
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,077
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,077
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
8,347
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
8,347
|
|
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 10 – Acquisitions
On January 27, 2012, the Company entered
into a share exchange agreement with Texas Gulf Oil & Gas, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“TGOG”), and the equity-holders
of TGOG. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company acquired all of the common stock of TGOG from its equity-holders,
representing one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of TGOG, in exchange for 4,000,000
newly-issued shares of Common Stock, of which 2,200,000 shares are being issued to seven (7) of the equity-holders and 1,800,000
shares are to be issued to one other equity-holder at a later date, which shall occur not later than 180 days following the closing
date and is subject to certain conditions. As a result of the transaction, TGOG became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
The Company’s acquisition of TGOG
did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and therefore pro forma disclosures are
not presented.
On February 3, 2012, the Company completed
the acquisition of Fishbone Solutions LTD. The consideration paid was approximately $1,921,000 for 100% of the company. The consideration
consisted of approximately $421,000 cash and a convertible note with restrictions for the amount of $1,500,000.
The allocation of the purchase price to
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the fair values was as follows:
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
619,806
|
|
Prepaid assets
|
|
|
47,653
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,175,000
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
862,889
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
2,705,348
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(784,160
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,921,188
|
|
The following unaudited pro forma summary
presents consolidated information of the Company as if the consolidation of Fishbone had occurred on January 1, 2011. The pro forma
financial information gives effect to the Company’s consolidation of Fishbone by the application of the pro forma adjustments
to the historical consolidated financial statements of the Company. Such unaudited pro forma financial information is based on
the historical financial statements of the Company and Fishbone and certain adjustments, which the Company believes to be reasonable
based on current available information, to give effect to these transactions. Pro forma adjustments were made from January 1, 2011
up to the date of the consolidation with the actual results reflected thereafter in the pro forma financial information.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial data does not purport to represent what the Company’s results of operations actually would have been if the consolidation
of Fishbone had occurred on January 1, 2011, or what such results will be for any future periods. The actual results in the periods
following the consolidation date may differ significantly from that reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial data for a number of reasons including, but not limited to, differences between the assumptions used to prepare the unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated financial data and the actual amounts.
Unaudited adjustments have been made to
adjust the results of Fishbone to reflect additional amortization expense that would have been incurred assuming the fair value
adjustments to intangible assets as well as additional interest expense on the debt assumed had been applied from January 1, 2011,
as well as additional pro forma adjustments, to give effect to these transactions occurring on January 1, 2011.
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
36,043,835
|
|
|
$
|
34,989,634
|
|
Costs and expenses, net
|
|
$
|
36,527,148
|
|
|
$
|
32,896,253
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(343,492
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,512,056
|
|
NOTE 11 – Dispositions
Effective September 6, 2012 the Company
sold 91% of its interests in Texas Gulf Oil & Gas, Inc. subsidiary for the return of 6,000,000 shares and a total value of
$1,171,988 to a shareholder. In connection with the transaction, the Company recorded a gain on the sale of the business of approximately
$348,000.
The Company recorded this
transaction at 12/31/12 and disclosed related party transaction per ASC 845. In addition, the Company considered recognition
and presentation of discontinued operations and concluded that no recognition or presentation was necessary, as TGOG is less
than 5% of the continuing cash flows of the Company.
On December 28, 2012, the Company sold
100% of Texas Gulf Fabricators, Inc. for $325,000 to a shareholder. In connection with the transaction, the Company recorded a
gain on the sale of approximately $50,000.
NOTE 12 – Contingencies
Various legal actions, claims, and other
contingencies arise in the normal course of our business. Contingencies are recorded in the consolidated financial statements,
or are otherwise disclosed, in accordance with ASC 450-20, “Loss Contingencies”. Specific reserves are provided for
loss contingencies to the extent we conclude that a loss is both probable and estimable. We use a case-by-case evaluation of the
underlying data and update our evaluation as further information becomes known, and the known claims as of this date are as follows:
Civil Action 4:12-CV-00055; Renato Acain
et al vs. International Plant Services LLC et al.
International Plant Services, LLC (IPS)
is a subsidiary of the Company. IPS has been sued in a matter presently pending in United States District Court, Southern District
of Texas, Houston Division by 55 Filipino workers alleging violations of RICO and other fiduciary errors. The suit was initially
instituted on May 27, 2011 and removed to U.S. District Court on January 6, 2012. The United States District Court remanded this
case to Texas State Court in September, 2012. The plaintiff is seeking relief in the form of unspecified monetary relief. The Company
believes that this lawsuit is without merit. The Company intends to pursue its claims and defenses vigorously.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Cause No. 2012-23084; Ardent Services, LLC vs. David D. Mathews
and Larry J. Laqua.
The Company is providing the defense of
its employees, Mr. Mathews (President and CEO of the Company) and Mr. Laqua (Vice President of a Company business unit), in
a matter involving their former employer, Ardent. Ardent is suing Mr. Mathews and Mr. Laqua in the 234th District Court,
Harris County, Houston, Texas for breach of confidentiality and non-solicitation clauses in certain employment agreements, along
with other breaches of duties allegedly owed. The Company intends to sponsor and fully assist in the defense of Mr. Mathews
and Mr. Laqua. On behalf of Mathews and Laqua, Company legal counsel has filed a motion to dismiss based on a forum selection
clause in a subject agreement. The suit was initially instituted on April 20, 2012. The plaintiff is seeking relief in the form
of injunctive and unspecified monetary relief. The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims.
Cause No. 4:13-cv-00505, Michael Rushing, Stephanie Rushing,
Penn Rushing and Florence Rushing v. Texas Gulf Energy, Inc. on behalf of CS Bankers V, LLC, Texas Gulf Fabricators, Inc., David
Mathews, Craig Crawford and Timothy Connolly, United States District Court for the Southern District.
The Company had originally filed against the Rushings for a
Declaratory Judgment alleging they had failed to perform relative to a letter of intent with Texas Gulf Fabricators, Inc., or alternatively,
that the letter of intent was not enforceable. The Company also filed a conversion action against the Rushings for removing
property from a fabrication facility. The Rushing Family filed two separate counterclaims in the underlying state court actions
before removing both actions to federal court in March 2013. On April 13, 2013, the federal court denied jurisdiction and
remanded the matter back to the Texas State Court in the proceedings known as: (i) Cause No. 2013-00543; Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
on behalf of CS Bankers V, LLC and Texas Gulf Fabricators, Inc. VS. Penn Rushing, et al, in the 270
th
Judicial District
Court of Harris County and (ii) Cause No. 2013-004690; Texas Gulf Energy, Inc. vs. Penn Rushing, et al, in the 270
th
Judicial
District Court of Harris County. The Rushings' allegations include fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation, breach
of fiduciary duty, conversion, equitable estoppel and securities violations.
These claims relate to a letter of intent and foreclosure
proceeding on a shop property in Baytown, Texas. The Rushings have not disclosed an amount of damages sought. The Company
is required to pay for the defense of Mr. Mathews, Mr. Crawford and Mr. Connolly. The Company opposes the removal to federal
court. The Company believes the Rushing's claims are without merit and intends to pursue its claims and defenses vigorously.
Based on our knowledge as of the date
of this filing, we believe that any amounts exceeding our recorded accruals should not materially affect our financial position,
results of operations or liquidity. It is the opinion of management that the eventual resolution of the above claims is unlikely
to have a material adverse effect on our financial position or operating results. However, the results of litigation are inherently
unpredictable and the possibility exists that the ultimate resolution of one or more of these matters could result in a negative
material effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
NOTE 13 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company’s two majority owners
as of December 31, 2012 maintain a 74.8% voting control of the Company. The Company utilizes corporations owed by the two majority
shareholders that provide certain services to the company, which include the following:
Management believes that the amounts paid
for these services are at or below those rates that would be payable to unrelated third parties and that our shareholder interests
are best served by continuing to use these services provided by companies who are related parties.
Due to related parties is $204,561 and
$1,430,773 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, for services performed by affiliates of the Company.
The Company primarily utilizes a foreign
corporation affiliated by common ownership for testing, recruiting, mobilization and training the foreign workforce for construction
projects. TGE pays $1.4 per hour billed by these employees for all of these services. Amounts payable to the related party as of
December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $19,689 and $77,396 respectively.
Costs of revenue of $642,708 and $1,580,407
for services provided by related parties are included in the income statements for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011,
respectively.
The Company utilizes a United States LLC
affiliated by common ownership for some of its hotels and lodging facilities to accommodate its construction workers. The Company
charges clients $65 per diem for workers on location and in turn pays $40 to the related company for this service. The Company
also has a one year lease for its operating facilities from this affiliate that are renewed annually. This service was terminated
in mid May 2012. Amounts payable to the related party of $2,278 and $997,120 are included in the balances as of December 31, 2012
and 2011, respectively. Costs of revenues for these services include $1,271,440 and $4,018,365 for hotel and lodging and rent of
$132,000 and $165,000 the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 14 - INCOME TAXES
The components of income tax expense (benefit) for the year
ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
|
|
December 31,
2012 (restated)
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
Current federal tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(139,821
|
)
|
|
$
|
568,941
|
|
Current state tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
Total tax expense(benefit)
|
|
$
|
(139,821
|
)
|
|
$
|
663,941
|
|
The effective tax rate for the Company is reconciled to statutory
rates as follows:
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
Statutory tax on book income (loss)
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Nondeductible expenses
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Domestic production tax and other
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
The provision for income taxes varied from the U.S. federal
statutory rate and average state tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, primarily as a result of the domestic
production tax state income taxes.
Components of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December
31, 2012 and 2011, are as follows:
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
130,000
|
|
|
$
|
130,000
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
130,000
|
|
|
$
|
130,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax over book depreciation
|
|
$
|
(29,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,000
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
(29,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,000
|
)
|
The Company is currently involved in a dispute with the Internal
Revenue Service regarding the deductibility of certain expenses taken in prior years. The Company believes it will prevail in the
matter with no liability, however, as a precaution the Company has accrued an estimated amount of the liability on the balance
sheet as of December 31, 2012.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 15 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common Stock
The total number of authorized shares of
the Company’s common stock is 500,000,000 shares, $0.00001 par value per share. As of December 31, 2012 there were 49,300,156
common shares issued and outstanding.
On December 30, 2011, pursuant to the merger
transaction between IPS and Global NuTech, shareholders of IPS received 29,411,765 of Global NuTech common stock and 10,000,000
shares of Global Nu-Tech Series B preferred stock which are convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.17
per share (or 58,823,529 common shares), subject to the terms therein. Shareholders of Global NuTech retained 9,895,789 shares
of common stock. The share exchange was treated as a recapitalization of IPS, and IPS (and its historical financial statements)
is the continuing entity for financial reporting purposes. In the first quarter of 2012, Global NuTech changed its name to Texas
Gulf Energy, Inc.
Preferred Stock
The total number of authorized shares of
the Company’s preferred stock is 100,000,000 shares, $0.00001 par value per share. The total number of designated shares
of the Company’s series A preferred stock is 2,900,000. The total number of designated shares of the Company’s series
B preferred stock is 10,000,000. As of December 31, 2011, there were 2,900,000 shares of series A preferred stock issued and outstanding
and 10,000,000 shares of series B preferred shares issued and outstanding. Series B preferred shares are senior to the common stock
of the Company. Series A preferred shares are senior to the series B preferred shares of the Company.
Series A convertible preferred stock
In December 2011, the Company issued 2,900,000
shares of Series A preferred shares for proceeds of $2,906,347 to the Company’s majority owners.
Holders of outstanding shares of the Company’s
series A preferred are entitled to receive dividends at the annual rate of 4%, when, as, and if declared, therefore non-cumulative,
by the Company’s board of directors. No dividends or similar distributions may be made on shares of capital stock or securities
junior to the Company’s series A preferred until dividends in the same amount per share on the Company’s series A preferred
have been declared and paid. In connection with a liquidation, winding-up, dissolution or sale of the Company, each share of the
Company’s series A preferred is entitled to receive $1.00 plus all declared and unpaid dividends thereon prior to similar
liquidation payments due on shares of the Company’s common stock or any other class of securities junior to the Company’s
series A preferred shares. The Company’s series A preferred are not entitled to participate with the holders of the Company’s
common stock with respect to the distribution of any remaining assets of the Company. Shares of Series A Preferred have the option
to convert into shares of common stock, at a conversion price of $.085 per share, on the earlier of : (a) the passing of three
years from the issuance date of shares of the series A preferred shares or (b) the change of control, or sale, of the Company;
Holders of outstanding shares of the Company’s series A preferred shall be entitled to vote on a 100-to-1 (preferred share-to-common
share) basis relative to the holders of common stock.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Series B convertible preferred stock
Holders of outstanding shares of the Company’s
series B preferred are entitled to receive dividends at the annual rate of 4%, when, as, and if declared, therefore non-cumulative,
by the Company’s board of directors. No dividends or similar distributions may be made on shares of capital stock or securities
junior to the Company’s series B preferred until dividends in the same amount per share on the Company’s series B preferred
have been declared and paid. In connection with a liquidation, winding-up, dissolution or sale of the Company, each share of the
Company’s series B preferred is entitled to receive $1.00 plus all declared and unpaid dividends thereon prior to similar
liquidation payments due on shares of the Company’s common stock or any other class of securities junior to the Company’s
series B preferred shares. The Company’s series B preferred are not entitled to participate with the holders of the Company’s
common stock with respect to the distribution of any remaining assets of the Company. Shares of series A preferred have the option
to convert into shares of common stock, at a conversion price of $.17 per share, on the earlier of : (a) the passing of three years
from the issuance date of shares of the series B preferred shares or (b) the change of control, or sale, of the Company; Holders
of outstanding shares of the Company’s series A preferred shall be entitled to vote on a 1-to-1 (preferred share-to-common
share) basis relative to the holders of common stock.
NOTE 16 – COMMITMENTS
Operating Leases and Other Commitments
The Company leases office facilities under
an operating lease agreement from a corporation affiliated by common ownership. This office lease consists of monthly installments
of $11,000 expiring on April 30, 2018. The Company has five options to renew the office lease for no more than five years in each
option. All taxes, utilities and interior improvements and repairs are paid by the Company. The abovementioned lease agreements
require future annual payments as follows:
2013
|
|
$
|
132,000
|
|
2014
|
|
|
132,000
|
|
2015
|
|
|
132,000
|
|
2016
|
|
|
132,000
|
|
2017
|
|
|
176,000
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
$
|
704,000
|
|
The Company is subject to certain litigation
arising in the ordinary course of business. Management does not believe that any litigation will have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s consolidated financial position.
Employment Agreements
The Company entered into employment agreements
with the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and other key employees and granted 28,477,806 restricted shares vesting
over 36 months. The fair value of the common stock on the date of grant was $0.09 or $2,563,002. During 2012, the Company and applicable
parties amended the Company’s employment agreements with the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer as well
its consulting agreement with Corporate Strategies, LLC. In part, the amendments provide for the right of the Company to clawback
or reclaim any unvested shares during the stated 3 year vesting period.
NOTE 17 – SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS
Three customers represented 11%, 11% and
7% of the Company’s gross sales for the year ended December 31, 2012. Three companies represented 26%, 12% and 7% of outstanding
accounts receivable at December 31, 2012. Four customers represented 25%, 14%, 13% and 11% of the Company’s gross sales and
four companies represented 25%, 16%, 11% and 11% of outstanding accounts receivable for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Texas Gulf Energy, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 18 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On March 13th 2013 the company was advised
by council that the Civil Action 4:12-CV-00055; Renato Acain et al vs. International Plant Services LLC et al matter has been dismissed
with no further liability to the Company.
Effective April 12, 2013, Noureddine Ayed, The Company’s
Chairman of the Board and a member of the Company’s Executive Committee, resigned from both positions and as a member of
the Board. The letter of resignation of Noureddine Ayed did not indicate, and our executives officers have not received any communication
indicating, that the resignation was the result of any disagreements on any matter relating to the Company’s operations,
policies or practices.
Effective April 12, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company,
by unanimous written consent, (i) accepted the resignation of Noureddine Ayed as Chairman of the Board and as the Company’s
Executive Committee and as a member of the Board and (ii) voted to eliminate the Company’s Executive Committee.
As of June 14, 2013 the $3 million receivables
purchase agreement with a merchant bank had $492,823 outstanding and $2,507,177 available.
As of June 14, 2013 the $1 million receivables
purchase agreement with a merchant bank had $204,459 outstanding and $794,541 available.
As of June 14, 2013 the $1 million line of credit with
Patriot Bank was increased to $1.25 million. As of June 14, 2013 the amount oustanding was $1,092,482 and $157,518 was
available.