UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant
to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009
Commission File Number 000-27811
CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR
MANUFACTURING LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Not Applicable
(Translation of registrants name into English)
Republic of Singapore
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
60 Woodlands Industrial Park D
Street 2, Singapore 738406
(65) 6362-2838
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F
þ
Form 40-F
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes
o
No
þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to registrant in connection with Rule
12g3-2(b). Not applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
The Company is incorporating by reference the information and exhibits set forth in this Form 6-K
into its registration statements on Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-155774); Form S-8 (Registration
No. 333-89849); Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-63814); Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-63816); Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-116844) and Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-145081).
CURRENCY OF PRESENTATION AND CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS
In this document, unless otherwise indicated, all references to Chartered, the Company, we,
our and us refer to Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd., a limited liability company
formed in the Republic of Singapore, and its subsidiaries. When we refer to Singapore dollars,
S$ and SGD in this document, we are referring to Singapore dollars, the legal currency of
Singapore. When we refer to U.S. dollars, dollars, $, US$ and USD in this document, we
are referring to United States dollars, the legal currency of the United States. When we refer to
Euro in this document, we are referring to Euro, the legal currency of certain member states of
the European Union and, when we refer to Yen in this document, we are referring to Japanese Yen,
the legal currency of Japan. When we refer to NTD in this document, we are referring to New
Taiwan dollars, the legal currency of Taiwan.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS MAY PROVE INACCURATE
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements, as defined in the safe harbor
provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements, including, without limitation, statements relating to the proposed acquisition of
Chartered, our belief that our sources of liquidity and projected cash flows will be sufficient to
meet our expected capital and research and development expenditures, debt service obligations,
investment and liquidity needs for at least the next twelve months, our expected capital
expenditures for 2009 and our expectations of Fab 7, reflect our current views with respect to
future events and financial performance, and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which
could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated.
Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are decreased consumer
confidence, credit crisis, financial market turmoil and the deteriorating global economic
conditions; the ability to access or renew existing or to obtain additional financing and the
terms thereof; changes in the demands from our customers; demand and supply outlook in the
semiconductor market; competition from existing foundries and new foundry companies resulting in
pricing pressures; excess inventory, life cycle, market outlook and trends for specific products;
product mix; unforeseen delays, interruptions and performance level of our fabrication facilities;
our progress on leading-edge products; changes in capacity plans, allocation and process
technology mix; unavailability of materials, equipment, manpower and expertise; access to or
delays in technological advances or our development of process technologies; the successful
implementation of our partnership, technology and supply alliances (including our joint
development agreements with International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and the other
joint development partners); the growth rate of fabless companies; the outsourcing strategy of
integrated device manufacturers (IDM) and our expectation that IDMs will utilize foundry
capacity more extensively. Although we believe the expectations reflected in such forward-looking
statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations
will be attained and, in relation to the proposed acquisition of Chartered, that the proposed
acquisition will be approved by our shareholders, that other conditions precedent to the closing
of the proposed acquisition will be satisfied or that such acquisition will occur. In addition to the
foregoing factors, a description of certain other risks and uncertainties which could cause actual
results to differ materially can be found in Item 3. Key Information D. Risk Factors in our
2008 annual report on Form 20-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. You are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements which reflect
managements current analysis of future events. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
524,501
|
|
|
$
|
805,726
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
69,560
|
|
|
|
66,301
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
Receivables, less allowances of $2,451 in 2008 and $1,680 in 2009
|
|
|
224,428
|
|
|
|
297,893
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
189,498
|
|
|
|
154,895
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
19,634
|
|
|
|
3,274
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
19,840
|
|
|
|
36,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,048,411
|
|
|
|
1,365,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in associated companies
|
|
|
28,924
|
|
|
|
34,662
|
|
Technology licenses and other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
48,178
|
|
|
|
35,376
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,845,668
|
|
|
|
2,768,222
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
53,992
|
|
|
|
34,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,025,173
|
|
|
$
|
4,238,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES, CONVERTIBLE REDEEMABLE PREFERENCE SHARES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables
|
|
$
|
311,264
|
|
|
$
|
337,913
|
|
Current installments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
163,232
|
|
|
|
565,745
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
102,355
|
|
|
|
86,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
576,851
|
|
|
|
990,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, excluding current installments
|
|
|
1,677,228
|
|
|
|
1,318,644
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
61,801
|
|
|
|
60,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,315,880
|
|
|
|
2,369,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible redeemable preference shares
|
|
|
265,879
|
|
|
|
273,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary share capital
|
|
|
2,706,244
|
|
|
|
3,010,312
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,208,166
|
)
|
|
|
(1,351,019
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(54,664
|
)
|
|
|
(53,724
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity of Chartered
|
|
|
1,443,414
|
|
|
|
1,605,569
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in CSP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
$
|
1,443,414
|
|
|
$
|
1,595,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, convertible redeemable preference shares and total equity
|
|
$
|
4,025,173
|
|
|
$
|
4,238,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
3
CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share units and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
463,648
|
|
|
$
|
415,228
|
|
|
$
|
1,309,440
|
|
|
$
|
1,008,175
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
398,068
|
|
|
|
327,254
|
|
|
|
1,109,407
|
|
|
|
916,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
65,580
|
|
|
|
87,974
|
|
|
|
200,033
|
|
|
|
91,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
|
|
10,974
|
|
|
|
6,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
44,184
|
|
|
|
43,878
|
|
|
|
132,474
|
|
|
|
137,672
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
19,493
|
|
|
|
14,914
|
|
|
|
54,921
|
|
|
|
41,390
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,196
|
|
|
|
18,486
|
|
|
|
33,154
|
|
|
|
39,571
|
|
Other operating expenses, net
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
6,480
|
|
|
|
5,116
|
|
|
|
15,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses, net
|
|
|
76,237
|
|
|
|
83,758
|
|
|
|
225,665
|
|
|
|
233,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of associated companies, net
|
|
|
8,941
|
|
|
|
8,827
|
|
|
|
28,192
|
|
|
|
13,306
|
|
Other income (loss), net
|
|
|
(941
|
)
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
8,782
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,992
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
11,608
|
|
|
|
5,736
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt discount
|
|
|
(16,553
|
)
|
|
|
(16,374
|
)
|
|
|
(49,990
|
)
|
|
|
(46,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax
|
|
|
(13,564
|
)
|
|
|
2,602
|
|
|
|
(16,066
|
)
|
|
|
(163,125
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
10,813
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(37,497
|
)
|
|
|
(10,050
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(24,377
|
)
|
|
|
2,660
|
|
|
|
21,431
|
|
|
|
(153,075
|
)
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to the
noncontrolling interest in CSP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Chartered
|
|
|
(24,377
|
)
|
|
|
(4,696
|
)
|
|
|
21,431
|
|
|
|
(142,853
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accretion to redemption value of convertible
redeemable preference shares
|
|
|
2,522
|
|
|
|
2,622
|
|
|
|
7,495
|
|
|
|
7,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to ordinary shareholders of
Chartered
|
|
$
|
(26,899
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,318
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,936
|
|
|
$
|
(150,643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per ordinary share*
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per ADS*
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
(2.22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of ordinary shares (in millions) used in
computing:*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per ordinary share
|
|
|
383.2
|
|
|
|
941.9
|
|
|
|
383.1
|
|
|
|
679.9
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) per ordinary share
|
|
|
383.2
|
|
|
|
941.9
|
|
|
|
383.3
|
|
|
|
679.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of ADSs (in millions) used in computing:*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per ADS
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
94.2
|
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
68.0
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) per ADS
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
94.2
|
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
68.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
The weighted average number of ordinary shares and ADS used in computing the basic and
diluted net earnings per ordinary share and ADS, respectively, have been retroactively
adjusted for the rights offering and the share consolidation see Note 5 of the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements for more details.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(24,377
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,660
|
|
|
$
|
21,431
|
|
|
$
|
(153,075
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on change in cash flow
hedging fair values
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Reclassification of cash flow hedging (gains) losses into
earnings
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
282
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
121
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(766
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(2,107
|
)
|
|
|
225
|
|
Reclassification of realized losses on available-for-sale
securities into earnings
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net
|
|
|
(1,464
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(1,594
|
)
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss), net
|
|
|
(25,841
|
)
|
|
|
2,562
|
|
|
|
19,837
|
|
|
|
(152,076
|
)
|
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the
noncontrolling interest in CSP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Chartered
|
|
$
|
(25,841
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,837
|
|
|
$
|
(141,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF TOTAL EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders of Chartered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hensive
|
|
Noncontrol-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Income
|
|
ling interest
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Share Capital
|
|
deficit
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
in CSP
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
Number
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
2,539,626
|
|
|
|
2,710,006
|
|
|
|
(1,115,587
|
)
|
|
|
(53,270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,541,149
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,579
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,394
|
)
|
Accretion to redemption value of
convertible redeemable
preference shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,042
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,042
|
)
|
Issuance of shares arising from
share-based awards
|
|
|
3,574
|
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
Employee share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,432
|
|
Non-employee share-based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
2,543,200
|
|
|
|
2,706,244
|
|
|
|
(1,208,166
|
)
|
|
|
(54,664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,443,414
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142,853
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,222
|
)
|
|
|
(153,075
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
Accretion to redemption value of
convertible redeemable
preference shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,790
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,790
|
)
|
Issuance of shares arising from
share-based awards
|
|
|
1,844
|
|
|
|
2,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,846
|
|
Employee share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,352
|
|
Non-employee share-based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares, net
of direct issuance costs
|
|
|
6,869,926
|
|
|
|
306,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,628
|
|
Adjustment for ten for one
share consolidation
|
|
|
(8,472,909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
942,061
|
|
|
|
3,010,312
|
|
|
|
(1,351,019
|
)
|
|
|
(53,724
|
)
|
|
|
(10,163
|
)
|
|
|
1,595,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
21,431
|
|
|
$
|
(153,075
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of associated companies, net
|
|
|
(28,192
|
)
|
|
|
(13,306
|
)
|
Cash dividends received from associated companies
|
|
|
28,457
|
|
|
|
7,689
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
433,698
|
|
|
|
380,142
|
|
Foreign exchange loss, net
|
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(691
|
)
|
Deferred tax benefit
|
|
|
(23,052
|
)
|
|
|
(9,952
|
)
|
Others, net
|
|
|
12,425
|
|
|
|
15,452
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from purchase
of a subsidiary in 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(6,666
|
)
|
|
|
(68,489
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
19,838
|
|
|
|
34,603
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(18,993
|
)
|
|
|
(3,666
|
)
|
Payables and other liabilities
|
|
|
(11,623
|
)
|
|
|
35,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
428,697
|
|
|
$
|
225,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(443,556
|
)
|
|
|
(280,234
|
)
|
Payments for technology licenses
|
|
|
(11,014
|
)
|
|
|
(4,381
|
)
|
Investment in associated companies
|
|
|
(8,041
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of a subsidiary, net of cash acquired of $6,523
|
|
|
(237,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Refund of deposits placed with a vendor
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, equipment
|
|
|
10,482
|
|
|
|
5,251
|
|
Proceeds from redemption of other investments
|
|
|
55,841
|
|
|
|
16,150
|
|
Others, net
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
$
|
(632,515
|
)
|
|
$
|
(261,698
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
389,072
|
|
|
|
167,905
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(433,631
|
)
|
|
|
(157,512
|
)
|
Capital lease payments
|
|
|
(3,972
|
)
|
|
|
(4,488
|
)
|
Receipts (refunds) of customer deposits
|
|
|
(5,609
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Issuance of ordinary shares, net of direct issuance costs
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
306,817
|
|
(Increase) decrease in cash restricted for debt repayment
|
|
|
(24,468
|
)
|
|
|
3,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
(77,619
|
)
|
|
$
|
315,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(281,248
|
)
|
|
|
281,225
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
743,173
|
|
|
|
524,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
|
$
|
461,925
|
|
|
$
|
805,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment acquired through capital lease
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,092
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share units and per share data)
|
|
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with United States of America (U.S.) generally accepted accounting principles
(U.S. GAAP) and, in the opinion of management, contain all adjustments necessary, all of
which are of a normal recurring nature except for the rights offering completed in April 2009
and share consolidation in May 2009 which resulted in adjustments being made to the Companys
share plans and agreements as discussed in Note 3 and retroactive adjustments to the net
earnings (loss) per ordinary share and American Depositary Share (ADS) as discussed in Note
5, to present fairly the financial information included herein. The accompanying unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Companys
annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 and the condensed consolidated
statement of total equity for the year ended December 31, 2008 included herein are derived from
the audited consolidated financial statements in the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2008 and as reclassified upon adoption of Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 810-10-65-1 on noncontrolling
interests in consolidated financial statements, which requires the presentation of
noncontrolling interests within equity. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements
as of September 30, 2009 and for three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September
30, 2009, have not been audited.
|
|
|
|
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the accounts of
Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd. (Chartered) and its majority-owned subsidiaries.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
|
|
|
|
On July 1, 2009, as a result of the FASBs Codification of U.S. GAAP, ASC became the single
source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. The Codification became effective for
financial statements that cover interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Prior to the adoption of ASC 810-10-65-1 on noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial
statements, none of the losses from Chartered Silicon Partners Pte Ltd (CSP) had been
allocated to the noncontrolling interest in the consolidated statements of operations since the
first quarter of 2003 onwards as the obligations of the noncontrolling interest were reduced to
zero in that quarter due to cumulative losses. CSP subsequently reported profits in the first
quarter of 2008. Accordingly, profits applicable to the noncontrolling interest in CSP were
taken to the consolidated statements of operation until the noncontrolling interests share of
losses previously recorded in the consolidated statements of operations is fully recovered. The
effect of not allocating profits (losses) of the noncontrolling interests in CSP in the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008 resulted in a decrease to the net income attributable
to Chartered by $1,513 and an increase to the net income attributable to Chartered by $4,802,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
The cumulative net losses not allocated to the noncontrolling shareholders of CSP according to
their proportionate ownership as of December 31, 2008 is $213,496.
|
|
|
|
ASC 810-10-65-1 on noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements became
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2008. It requires that accounting and reporting for minority interests be
recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. This ASC
also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly
identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the
noncontrolling owners.
|
|
|
|
Supplemental pro forma financial information is presented below as if ASC 810-10-65-1 on
noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements was not adopted on January 1,
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
Pro forma net income (loss) attributable to Chartered
|
|
|
2,660
|
|
|
|
(153,075
|
)
|
Pro forma net income (loss) available to ordinary shareholders of
Chartered
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(160,865
|
)
|
Pro forma basic net income (loss) per ordinary share
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
Pro forma diluted net income (loss) per ordinary share
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
Pro forma basic net income (loss) per ADS
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
(2.37
|
)
|
Pro forma diluted net income (loss) per ADS
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
(2.37
|
)
|
8
|
|
On September 7, 2009, the respective boards of directors of Chartered and ATIC International
Investment Company LLC (the Acquiror) announced the proposed acquisition of Chartered by the
Acquiror by way of a scheme of arrangement under Section 210 of the Companies Act, Chapter 50 of
Singapore (the Scheme). The Acquiror is a special purpose vehicle incorporated in Abu Dhabi
and wholly-owned by Advanced Technology Investment Company LLC (ATIC). ATIC is a technology
investment company wholly-owned by the Government of Abu Dhabi. On October 9, 2009, Chartered
dispatched the scheme document to ordinary shareholders containing details of the Scheme (the
Scheme Document) together with related documentation.
|
|
|
|
As described in the Scheme Document, the Scheme requires the approval of Chartereds ordinary
shareholders at a meeting convened at the direction of the High Court of the Republic of
Singapore. In connection with the Scheme, Chartered has also given notice to convene an
extraordinary general meeting and a class meeting of holders of convertible redeemable
preference shares in the capital of Chartered to pass special resolutions relating to amendments
of Chartereds Articles of Association specified in the proxy statements for these meetings
dispatched together with the Scheme Document. These meetings are scheduled to be held on
November 4, 2009. The Scheme will also require the subsequent sanction of the High Court of the
Republic of Singapore and satisfaction (or, where applicable, waiver) of customary conditions,
including regulatory conditions. Subject to the satisfaction (or, where applicable, waiver) of
the other conditions set out in the Scheme Document, the Scheme is expected to become effective
in December 2009. The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements do not reflect any
adjustments to the assets and liabilities that might occur if such shareholder approval is
obtained and Chartered becomes a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Acquiror.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
Rights Offering and Share Consolidation
|
|
|
On March 9, 2009, the Company announced a rights offering of approximately 6,869,926,194 new
ordinary shares (Shares), directly or in the form of ADS.
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the rights offering:
|
|
|
|
27 new Shares were offered for every 10 Shares held at S$0.07 per rights share;
and
|
|
|
|
|
27 new ADSs were offered for every 10 ADSs held at a price of US$0.46 per rights
ADS.
|
|
|
The rights offering was completed on April 15, 2009 and final net proceeds from the rights
offering were approximately $307 million.
|
|
|
|
Subsequent to the completion of the rights offering, the Company held a ten for one share
consolidation which was approved during an Extraordinary General Meeting of shareholders on
April 30, 2009. The share consolidation took effect on May 21, 2009.
|
|
|
|
In connection with the rights offering and the share consolidation, adjustments were made with
respect to:
|
|
|
|
the exercise price of, and number of ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of,
outstanding options issued under the 1999 employee share option plan (1999 Option
Plan);
|
|
|
|
|
the number of ordinary shares issuable upon vesting of awards issued under the
restricted share unit plan (RSU Plan) and the performance share unit plan (PSU
Plan);
|
|
|
|
|
the conversion price of convertible redeemable preference shares (CRPS); and
|
|
|
|
|
the strike prices and number of ordinary shares issuable under the call option
with Goldman Sachs International (GS).
|
|
|
As a result of the rights offering in March 2009, changes were made on March 18, 2009, being
the modification date, to both the exercise price and the number of outstanding share options
granted under the 1999 Option Plan. The adjustments were made by multiplying each existing
option exercise price by 0.6632 and multiplying the number of outstanding share options by
1.5078. The number of share options granted under the 1999 Option Plan increased by 51,146
options immediately after the modification.
|
|
|
|
Subsequently, as a result of the share consolidation in May 2009, further changes were made on
May 21, 2009, being the modification date, to both the exercise price and the number of
outstanding share options granted under the 1999 Option Plan. The adjustments were made by
multiplying each existing option exercise price by 10 and multiplying the number of outstanding
share options by 0.1. The number of share options granted under the 1999 Option Plan decreased
by 132,499 options immediately after the modification.
|
|
|
|
The modification to the 1999 Option Plan as a result of the rights offering in March 2009 and
the share consolidation in May 2009 did not result in any incremental compensation cost as the
fair value of the modified awards equals the fair value of the original awards immediately
before the modification. As of September 30, 2009, the number of share options outstanding
|
9
|
|
was 14,480.
|
|
|
|
The 1999 Option Plan expired on January 28, 2009.
|
|
|
As a result of the rights offering in March 2009, changes were made on March 18, 2009, being
the modification date, to the number of outstanding RSUs granted under the RSU Plan. The
adjustments were made by multiplying the number of outstanding RSUs by 1.5078. The number of
RSUs granted under the RSU Plan increased by 5,468 RSUs immediately after the modification.
|
|
|
|
Subsequently, as a result of the share consolidation in May 2009, further changes were made on
May 21, 2009, being the modification date, to the number of outstanding RSUs granted under the
RSU Plan. The adjustments were made by multiplying the number of outstanding RSUs by 0.1. The
number of RSUs granted under the RSU Plan decreased by 14,504 RSUs immediately after the
modification.
|
|
|
|
The modification to the RSU Plan as a result of the rights offering in March 2009 and the share
consolidation in May 2009 did not result in any incremental compensation cost as the fair value
of the modified awards equals the fair value of the original awards immediately before the
modification. As of September 30, 2009, the number of RSUs outstanding was 8,292.
|
|
|
|
See Note 12 for details of new RSU grants during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
As a result of the rights offering in March 2009, changes were made on March 18, 2009, being
the modification date, to the base number of outstanding PSUs granted under the PSU Plan. The
adjustments were made by multiplying the base number of outstanding PSUs by 1.5078. The base
number of outstanding PSUs granted under the PSU Plan increased by 2,234 PSUs immediately after
the modification.
|
|
|
|
Subsequently, as a result of the share consolidation in May 2009, further changes were made on
May 21, 2009, being the modification date, to the base number of outstanding PSUs granted under
the PSU Plan. The adjustments were made by multiplying the base number of outstanding PSUs by
0.1. The base number of outstanding PSUs granted under the PSU Plan decreased by 5,969 PSUs
immediately after the modification.
|
|
|
|
The modification to the PSU Plan as a result of the rights offering in March 2009 and the share
consolidation in May 2009 did not result in any incremental compensation cost as the fair value
of the modified awards equals the fair value of the original awards immediately before the
modification. As of September 30, 2009, the number of PSUs outstanding was 980.
|
|
|
|
See Note 12 for details of new PSU grants during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, there are 28 outstanding CRPS, each with a redemption price of US$10.
Prior to the rights offering and the share consolidation, holders of the CRPS may convert the
CRPS into new Shares or, subject to certain limitations, ADSs at a conversion price of $0.8719
per Share at any time before the close of business on the 7th business day prior to maturity or
early redemption.
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the terms of the Articles of Association of the Company, such conversion price is
required to be adjusted on account of the rights offering and the share consolidation. As a
result of the rights offering, the conversion price was adjusted to $0.4120 per Share. This
adjustment was made on March 18, 2009, being the modification date for the rights offering.
|
|
|
|
Subsequently, as a result of the share consolidation, the conversion price was further adjusted
to $4.12 per Share. This adjustment was made on May 21, 2009, being the modification date for
the share consolidation.
|
|
|
Pursuant to the original provisions of the call option agreement with GS, GS is entitled to
purchase up to 214,800 of new ordinary shares (Options) at US$1.408 per share (Strike
Price) and the Company may terminate the transaction early, in whole or in part, if the
closing price of the Companys ordinary shares is equal to or higher than US$1.76 (equivalent
to 125% of the US$1.408 exercise price termed as the Higher Soft Call Strike Price) on each of
any 20 business days in any consecutive 30 business day period. As a result of the rights
offering, the number of Options was adjusted from 214,800 to 323,883, the Strike Price was
adjusted from $1.408 to $0.9338, and the Higher Soft Call Strike Price was adjusted from $1.76
to $1.1672 by GS on March 16, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Subsequently, as a result of the share consolidation, the number of Options was further
adjusted from 323,883 to 32,388, the Strike Price was adjusted from $0.9338 to $9.338, and the
Higher Soft Call Strike Price was adjusted from $1.1672 to $11.672 by GS on May 21, 2009.
|
10
|
|
The preparation of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure about contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the respective reporting
periods. Significant items subject to judgment and estimates include the amount of income tax
expense, the estimated useful lives and salvage values of long-lived assets, the recoverability
of the carrying value of long-lived assets, other-than-temporary impairment assessments of
other investments, available-for-sale securities and investments in other equity securities,
the realization of deferred income tax assets, the valuation of accounts receivable and
inventories, the determination of normal capacity of the Companys production facilities, the
recognition of revenue, the recognition and measurement of sales credits and returns allowance,
the likelihood of achieving the milestones attached to Government grants, managements
projections of achievement of performance conditions for grants under the performance share
units plan over the performance period, the fair value of share-based employee compensation
awards and financial instruments, the amount of asset retirement obligations and costs, and the
valuation of net assets acquired from purchase business combinations. These estimates and
assumptions are based on managements best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its
estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors,
including the current economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under
the circumstances. Management adjusts such estimates and assumptions when facts and
circumstances dictate. Illiquid credit markets; volatile equity, foreign currency and energy
markets; and declines in consumer spending have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent
in such estimates and assumptions. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with
precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in those
estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in
the financial statements in future periods.
|
|
|
|
During 2008, the Company revised the estimated useful lives of its twelve-inch process
equipment and machinery from five years to eight years and the related mechanical and
electrical installations from ten years to fifteen years. In addition, the estimated salvage
values of the related process equipment and machinery were reduced to zero. These changes were
made to better reflect the expected pattern of economic benefits from the use of the equipment
and machinery over time based on an analysis of the expected technology lifecycle, historical
usage experience and industry practices. The change in estimated useful lives and residual
values is a change in accounting estimate that was applied prospectively from October 1, 2008.
The impact of this change was a decrease in the Companys net loss by $27,090 and $73,774 and a
decrease in the Companys basic and diluted net loss per ADS by $0.29 and $1.09 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary
share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by $0.03 and $0.11,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
During 2008, the Company changed the estimated useful lives for certain technology-related
intangible assets classified under Technology licenses in the consolidated balance sheets
from three to five years. The change was made to better reflect the expected pattern of
economic benefits from the use of the intangible assets over time based on an analysis of the
expected future usage of the underlying technology and historical usage experience. The change
in estimated useful lives is a change in accounting estimate that was applied prospectively
from October 1, 2008. The impact of this change was a decrease in the net loss of the Company
by $1,098 and $3,516 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
Basic and diluted net loss per ADS for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009
decreased by $0.01 and $0.05, respectively. Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 were not affected by the impact of this change. Basic
and diluted net loss per ordinary share for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased
by $0.01.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
Net Earnings (Loss) Per Ordinary Share
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per ordinary share is computed by deducting from (adding to) net
income (loss) available to ordinary shareholders of Chartered the accretion to redemption value
of the convertible redeemable preference shares and dividing the resulting amount of net income
(loss) available to ordinary shareholders of Chartered by the weighted-average number of
ordinary shares outstanding. Diluted net earnings (loss) per ordinary share is computed using
the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding plus potentially dilutive
securities, which includes the dilutive effect of share options using the treasury stock
method, the dilutive effect of restricted share units, the impact of contingently issuable
share-based awards with performance conditions and the dilutive effect of ordinary shares
issuable upon the assumed conversion of the Companys convertible securities. The accretion
charges on convertible securities are added back to net income available to ordinary
shareholders of Chartered when the related ordinary share equivalents are included in computing
diluted net earnings (loss) per ordinary share.
|
|
|
|
The weighted average number of ordinary shares and ADSs used in computing the comparative basic
and diluted net earnings (loss) per ordinary share and ADS, respectively, for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, were retroactively adjusted to take effect of the
following:
|
11
|
|
|
bonus element contained within the rights offering, and
|
|
|
|
|
the ten for one share consolidation as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
|
|
Nine Months
Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
2008
|
|
September 30,
2008
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per ordinary share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
retroactive adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
after adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) per ordinary share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
retroactive adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
after adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per ADS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
retroactive adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
after adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) per ADS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
retroactive adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
after adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
Number of ordinary shares (in millions) used in computing basic net earnings
(loss) per ordinary share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
2,541.6
|
|
|
|
2,540.8
|
|
retroactive adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(2,158.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2,157.7
|
)
|
after adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
383.2
|
|
|
|
383.1
|
|
|
Number of ordinary shares (in millions) used in computing diluted net earnings
(loss) per ordinary share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
2,541.6
|
|
|
|
2,541.9
|
|
retroactive adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(2,158.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2,158.6
|
)
|
after adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
383.2
|
|
|
|
383.3
|
|
|
Number of ADSs (in millions) used in computing basic net earnings (loss) per ADS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
254.2
|
|
|
|
254.1
|
|
retroactive adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(215.9
|
)
|
|
|
(215.8
|
)
|
after adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
Number of ADSs (in millions) used in computing diluted net earnings (loss) per ADS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
254.2
|
|
|
|
254.2
|
|
retroactive adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
(215.9
|
)
|
|
|
(215.9
|
)
|
after adjustment for rights offering and share consolidation
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
The Company excluded certain potentially dilutive securities for each period presented from its
diluted net earnings (loss) per ordinary share computation because:
|
i.
|
|
The exercise price or conversion price of the securities exceeded the average
fair value of the Companys share price; or
|
|
|
ii.
|
|
The total assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method resulted in negative
incremental shares; or
|
|
|
iii.
|
|
The accretion to redemption value of convertible securities per ordinary share
obtainable on conversion was higher than the basic net earnings per ordinary share, as
adjusted for the effect of any potentially dilutive securities which were more dilutive
than the convertible securities; or
|
|
|
iv.
|
|
The conditions for the vesting of the performance share units were not expected
to be met; or
|
|
|
v.
|
|
The Company has net losses available to ordinary shareholders of Chartered.
|
12
|
|
The below information, including those of the comparative periods, reflect the effects of the
rights offering and the share consolidation.
|
|
|
|
A summary of the excluded potentially dilutive securities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
Convertible redeemable preference shares
|
|
|
68,803
|
|
|
|
68,803
|
|
|
|
68,803
|
|
|
|
68,803
|
|
Call option with Goldman Sachs International
|
|
|
32,388
|
|
|
|
32,388
|
|
|
|
32,388
|
|
|
|
32,388
|
|
Employee share options
|
|
|
16,184
|
|
|
|
14,480
|
|
|
|
16,146
|
|
|
|
14,480
|
|
Performance share units
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
980
|
|
Restricted share units
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
8,292
|
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
8,292
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, the conversion price of the convertible redeemable preference shares,
the per share exercise price of the call option with GS and the weighted-average exercise price
of employee stock options outstanding was $4.12, $9.338 and $12.18, respectively, as adjusted
for the rights offering and the share consolidation.
|
|
|
In the first quarter of 2009, to encourage employers to preserve jobs and help Singaporeans
stay employed, the Singapore government introduced the Jobs Credit Scheme in the
2009 Budget. Employers receive cash grants up to 12% on the first S$2,500 of the qualifying
monthly wages of each employee paid from October 2008 to September 2009 on a quarterly basis.
In October 2009, the Singapore government announced that the Jobs Credit Scheme will be extended for six
months with another two payments in March and June 2010 at stepped down rates, of 6% and 3%,
respectively, on the first S$2,500 of the qualifying monthly wages of each employee. The
condition of the grant is that the employee must continue to be on the Companys payroll in the
following month subsequent to a quarter. These payments have been granted tax exemption by the
Singapore government.
|
|
|
|
The Company recognizes the grant at the end of each quarter when there is reasonable assurance
that the condition will be complied with and that the grant will be received.
|
|
|
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, $2,390 and $9,280, respectively, were
recorded as a reduction of the related payroll expenses, which the
Jobs Credit Scheme intended to
reimburse. Out of the total grant which was recorded, $2,383, $2,286 and $2,294 were received
on March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009, and September 30, 2009, respectively, with the remaining
amount expected to be received in December 2009.
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2009, the Company adopted ASC 320-10-65-1 on investments debt and
equity securities which requires the Company to provide all disclosures required by ASC
320-10-50 in interim reporting periods.
|
|
|
|
The Companys investments in available-for-sale equity securities consist of investments in the
common stock of two companies in the semiconductor industry. The fair value of the investments
is based on quoted market prices in active markets at the respective balance sheet dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
1,238
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(288
|
)
|
|
$
|
950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
874
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company realized losses amounting to $446 and $1,287 as a result of other-than-temporary
impairment assessments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. No
realized gains and losses were recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The
Company realized losses amounting to $365 as a result of other-than-temporary
|
13
|
|
impairment
assessments for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
The following table shows the fair value and gross unrealized gains and (losses) recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to the Companys available-for-sale equity
securities, aggregated by the length of time the securities have been in a continuous unrealized
gain and (loss) position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
950
|
|
|
$
|
(288
|
)
|
|
$
|
950
|
|
|
$
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
1,175
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
1,175
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, one of the investments was in an unrealized gain position while the
other was in an unrealized loss position. Based on the Companys evaluation, the investment in a
net unrealized loss position was not considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, both of the investments were in unrealized gain positions.
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009, none of the investments were in continuous
unrealized loss positions for a period greater than twelve months.
|
|
|
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
12,509
|
|
|
$
|
6,856
|
|
Work-in-progress
|
|
|
169,002
|
|
|
|
139,785
|
|
Consumable supplies and spares
|
|
|
7,987
|
|
|
|
8,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
189,498
|
|
|
$
|
154,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has an investment in a private enhanced cash fund (Fund), which is managed by an
external financial institution and consists primarily of corporate debt, mortgage-backed
securities and asset-backed securities. Due to the nature of the securities that the Fund
invests in, the Funds underlying securities have been exposed to adverse market conditions
that have affected the value of the collateral and the liquidity of the Fund. As a result, in
December 2007, the investment manager of the Fund halted demand redemptions and announced its
intention to liquidate the Fund. The investment in the Fund, which was classified as cash
equivalent since the time of placement in 2003, was reclassified to Other investments as of
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
The Company received cash proceeds of $13,481 and $55,841 in redemptions from the Fund for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, resulting in a realized loss of
$92 and $132 on the redemptions for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company received cash
proceeds of $8,626 and $16,150, respectively, in redemptions from the Fund, resulting in
realized gains of $530 and $613 on the redemptions for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively. The Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment loss
of $429 and $1,466 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. No
other-than-temporary impairment loss was recorded for the Fund for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009. The fair value of the Companys pro-rata share of the remaining
investment in the Fund was $19,634 and $4,376, as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009,
respectively. As of December 31, 2008, the carrying value of the Companys pro-rata share of
the remaining investment in the Fund of $19,634 was classified in Other
|
14
|
|
investments. As of
September 30, 2009, the carrying value of the Companys pro-rata share of the remaining
investment in the Fund was $4,097. As the redemption of a portion of the Fund is not expected to be within
the next 12 months, $823 was reclassified from Other investments to Other non-current
assets as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2009, the Company recorded additional amounts of deferred tax assets
due primarily to the unabsorbed wear and tear allowances and tax losses of Chartered
Semiconductor Manufacturing (Tampines) Pte. Ltd. (CST or Fab 3E) of approximately $493,203
and $29,732, respectively, which became available for carry forward upon approval from the
Singapore tax authorities. A net tax benefit of $9,964 is recognized based on a portion of the
deferred tax assets that is assessed as more likely than not to be realizable through offset
against existing deferred tax liabilities. A valuation allowance is established for the
remaining deferred tax assets which are assessed as more likely than not to be unrealizable for
offset against future taxable income. Such future taxable income is based on the projection of
the Company which is contingent upon future market conditions.
|
|
|
|
There is no significant change in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, as provided
under ASC 740-10 on income taxes, as of September 30, 2009 as compared to December 31, 2008.
The Company anticipates that the liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits recorded for the
Year of Assessment 2003 (fiscal year 2002) amounting to $377 would be reversed out within the
next 12 months as the statute of limitations for the Comptroller of Income Tax to raise
additional assessments for that tax year will lapse by December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
The Company is subject to taxation in Singapore and other foreign tax jurisdictions. A summary
of the tax years that remain
subject to examination in the Companys major tax jurisdictions are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal years that remain subject to examination as of
|
Major tax jurisdiction
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
2003 and forward
|
|
United States of America
|
|
|
2006 and forward
|
|
|
|
11.
|
|
Long-term Debt and Obligations under Capital Leases
|
|
|
Long-term debt consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Floating rate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$653,131 EXIM Guaranteed Loan
|
|
$
|
459,771
|
|
|
$
|
335,981
|
|
$609,733 EXIM Guaranteed Loan
|
|
|
90,463
|
|
|
|
262,400
|
|
Société Générale Term Loan
|
|
|
119,234
|
|
|
|
95,387
|
|
JBIC/SMBC Term Loan (Tranche B)
|
|
|
71,841
|
|
|
|
71,841
|
|
Fixed rate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.645% JBIC/SMBC Term Loan (Tranche A)
|
|
|
71,841
|
|
|
|
71,841
|
|
5.75% senior notes due 2010
|
|
|
373,546
|
|
|
|
374,215
|
|
6.00% amortizing bonds due 2010
|
|
|
20,351
|
|
|
|
10,476
|
|
6.25% senior notes due 2013
|
|
|
298,125
|
|
|
|
298,418
|
|
6.375% senior notes due 2015
|
|
|
247,397
|
|
|
|
247,641
|
|
Others
|
|
|
7,775
|
|
|
|
6,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,760,344
|
|
|
|
1,774,588
|
|
Less: Current installments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(157,512
|
)
|
|
|
(558,568
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current installments
|
|
$
|
1,602,832
|
|
|
$
|
1,216,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Obligations under capital leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Minimum future lease payments
|
|
$
|
121,497
|
|
|
$
|
166,804
|
|
Amount representing interest at rates of 5.1% to 7.8%
|
|
|
(41,381
|
)
|
|
|
(57,003
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum future lease payments
|
|
|
80,116
|
|
|
|
109,801
|
|
Less: Current installments
|
|
|
(5,720
|
)
|
|
|
(7,177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, excluding current installments
|
|
$
|
74,396
|
|
|
$
|
102,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current installments of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
157,512
|
|
|
$
|
558,568
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
5,720
|
|
|
|
7,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
163,232
|
|
|
$
|
565,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion, excluding current installments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,602,832
|
|
|
$
|
1,216,020
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
74,396
|
|
|
|
102,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,677,228
|
|
|
$
|
1,318,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Interest Rates as of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
Debt obligations at floating rates
|
|
|
3.25
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
Debt obligations at fixed rates
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
7.10
|
%
|
|
|
6.54
|
%
|
|
|
The Company made a repayment of $61,895 each in both January 2009 and July 2009 on the $653,131
Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM) Guaranteed Loan.
|
|
|
|
The Company made the second and third drawdowns of $91,229 and $80,708 in February 2009 and
September 2009, respectively, from the first tranche of the $609,733 EXIM Guaranteed Loan. As
of September 30, 2009, the remaining amount available for drawdown under this facility is
$347,333.
|
|
|
|
The Company made a principal repayment of $11,923 each in both March 2009 and September 2009 on
tranche A of the $189,871 term loan facility from Société Générale, with Atradius Dutch State
Business NV (Atradius) as the export credit insurer.
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2009, the Company entered into a new contract for supply of gases used
by the fabrication facilities of the Company, which was included as obligations under capital
leases. The Company has assessed that this supply contract contains a lease pursuant to ASC
840-10 on leases, and accounts for this as a capital lease. As of September 30, 2009, the
present value of the remaining minimum lease payments under this contract is $32,386.
|
|
|
In May 2009, 2,659 RSUs were granted under the RSU Plan, including 22 RSUs which were granted
to employees of Silicon Manufacturing Partners Pte Ltd (SMP). In August 2009, an additional
161 RSUs were granted under the RSU Plan, of which none were granted to employees of SMP.
|
|
|
|
The RSUs vest according to the vesting schedule, and ordinary shares will be issued provided
the employee remains employed by the Company through the vesting dates; otherwise the unvested
RSUs are forfeited. The grant-date fair value of awards granted under the RSU Plan is based on
the average of the high and low quotes of the Companys ordinary shares at the date of grant.
SMP reimburses the Company for the share-based compensation expense in respect of the RSUs that
were granted to its employees.
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of RSUs granted in May 2009 and in August 2009 is
$1.54 and $1.57, respectively. Total share-based compensation expense recognized for the RSUs
granted in May 2009 and August 2009 for the
|
16
|
|
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
$340 and $450, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, the total
compensation expense related to unvested RSUs not yet recognized is estimated at approximately
$3,719 which is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average period of 2.7 years.
|
|
|
|
Pre-vesting forfeitures for RSUs granted in May 2009 and in August 2009 were estimated to be
approximately 0% to 3.08% for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 based on
historical and expected attrition rates.
|
|
|
|
As share-based compensation expense does not satisfy the conditions for tax deduction in
Singapore, the recognition of the share-based compensation expense did not result in
recognition of an income tax benefit.
|
|
|
In May 2009, a total of 376 base number of PSUs was granted under the PSU Plan that may be
awarded at the end of a three-year performance period except for 36 PSUs which vested
immediately upon grant date. The offer of PSUs is communicated to eligible employees via the
grant notice (PSU Agreement).
|
|
|
|
The vesting of the PSUs granted in May 2009, except for PSUs which vested immediately upon
grant date, is contingent upon the achievement of pre-determined levels of Longer Term
Break-Even Utilisation (BEU), Absolute Total Shareholder Return (TSR) and Relative TSR as
those measures are defined in the PSU Agreement. All pre-determined levels have been
established at the grant date. All conditions are determined based on the BEU to be achieved
for the financial year of 2011, the average of three financial years Absolute TSR and the
average of three financial years Relative TSR. The BEU is calculated by measuring the
breakeven utilization rate of the Company. The Absolute TSR is calculated by adding the
dividend yield to the change in the opening and closing share price of the Companys ordinary
shares for the performance period. The Relative TSR is calculated by comparing the TSR of the
Company against the TSR of a pre-defined peer in the semiconductor industry. The achievement of
BEU is a performance condition while the achievement of Absolute TSR and Relative TSR are
market conditions. 50% of the base number of PSUs will vest according to the achievement of the
BEU, 25% will vest according to the achievement of the Absolute TSR and 25% will vest according
to the achievement of the Relative TSR. The number of PSUs that will ultimately vest range from
0% to 150% of the base number of PSUs awarded, or zero, subject to the achievement of either of
the abovementioned performance condition or market conditions, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of PSUs granted in May 2009 is $1.64. Total
share-based compensation expense recognized for the PSUs granted in May 2009 for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $22 and $85, respectively. Depending upon the
Companys performance against target performance measures specified in the award agreements, as
of September 30, 2009, the total compensation expense related to unvested PSUs not yet
recognized is estimated to be approximately $255 which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.8 years.
|
|
|
|
The grant-date fair value for the performance-based portion of the award was based on the
average of the high and low quotes of the Companys ordinary shares at the date of grant.
|
|
|
|
The grant-date fair value for the market-based portions of the award is calculated by an
independent third-party appraiser which adopted the Monte-Carlo valuation model with the
following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three and Nine Months
|
|
|
ended September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
The risk-free rate is based upon observed interest rates appropriate for the term of the
Companys PSUs. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility rates of the Companys
ordinary shares.
|
|
|
|
Pre-vesting forfeitures for PSUs granted in May 2009 were estimated to be approximately 0% to
3.86% for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 based on historical and
expected attrition rates.
|
|
|
|
As share-based compensation expense does not satisfy the conditions for tax deduction in
Singapore, the recognition of the share-based compensation expense did not result in
recognition of an income tax benefit.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Supplement Retention Plan
|
|
|
In June 2009, the Company approved an additional retention plan (supplemental plan) intended
to act as a supplement to the Companys existing retention plan which was implemented in 2007.
This supplemental plan only covers selected management personnel.
|
|
|
|
The supplemental plan is comprised of a cash and a RSU component. The cash component is awarded
in accordance to an approved schedule, and will be paid over 4 years based on the specified
payment dates provided the employee remains
|
17
|
|
employed by the Company through the approved payment
dates, otherwise the unpaid amount is forfeited.
|
|
|
|
4,501 RSUs have been awarded pursuant to the RSU component with vesting based on performance and
service conditions of two to three year period. The RSUs grants and conditions have been
communicated to eligible employees via the letter of award (RSU Agreement).
|
|
|
|
These RSUs vest according to the vesting schedule, and ordinary shares will be issued provided
the employee remains employed by the Company through the vesting dates; otherwise the unvested
RSUs are forfeited. The grant-date fair value for the award was based on the average of the high
and low quotes of the Companys ordinary shares at the date of the grant.
|
|
|
|
The vesting of the RSUs granted in June 2009 is contingent upon the achievement of
pre-determined levels of technological roadmap progress and market share for high-end products
as those measures defined in the RSU Agreement. All conditions are determined based on the
technological roadmap progress and market share for high-end products to be achieved at the end
of a two year period in December 31, 2010. The technological roadmap progress is measured
against pre-determined targets on certain selected technology nodes. The market share for
high-end products is calculated by the average of the Companys total revenue and the sum of
total revenue of pre-determined peers in the semiconductor industry at the end of financial year
of 2010. The achievement of the technological roadmap progress and market share for high-end
products are performance conditions. 50% of the base number of RSUs will vest according to the
achievement of the technological roadmap progress and 50% will vest according to the achievement
of the market share for high-end products.
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense recognized for the RSUs granted in June 2009 for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $561 and $748, respectively. As of September
30, 2009, the total compensation expense related to unvested RSUs not yet recognized is
estimated at approximately $5,988 which is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average
period of 2.7 years.
|
|
|
|
Pre-vesting forfeitures for RSUs granted in June 2009 were estimated to be nil based on
historical and expected attrition rates.
As share-based compensation expense does not satisfy the conditions for tax deduction in
Singapore, the recognition of the share-based compensation expense did not result in recognition
of an income tax benefit.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Effects of Proposed Acquisition
|
|
|
Upon the Scheme becoming effective, the vesting period of all RSUs and PSUs awards will be
accelerated, such that all granted and outstanding RSUs and PSUs will be fully vested. In
addition, all outstanding share options granted under the 1999 Option Plan will be cancelled
with no replacement award or other form of consideration.
|
|
|
|
13.
|
|
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
|
|
ASC 815-10 on derivatives and hedging requires disclosures about a companys derivative
activities and how the related hedged items affect a companys financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. To meet the objectives, ASC 815-10 requires qualitative disclosures
about the Companys objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments and quantitative
disclosures for fair value amounts of gains and losses associated with derivative instruments.
|
|
|
|
The Companys exposure to financial market risks is derived primarily from changes in interest
rates and foreign exchange rates. The Company assesses interest rate cash flow risk and
currency exchange cash flow risk by identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate or
currency exchange rate exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by
evaluating hedging opportunities. To manage interest rate risk, the Company may utilize
interest rate derivative instruments to modify the interest characteristics of its outstanding
debts. To protect against volatility of future cash flows caused by changes in exchange rates,
the Company may use forward exchange contracts, currency options and currency swap instruments
for forecasted transactions such as operating expenses and capital purchases.
|
|
|
|
The Company is exposed to credit risk and market risk by using derivative instruments to hedge
exposures of changes in foreign currency rates and interest rates. Credit risk is the failure
of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. When the fair value
of a derivative contract is positive, the counterparty owes the Company, which creates credit
risk for the Company. When the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, the Company
owes the counterparty and, therefore, is not exposed to credit risk. The Company anticipates,
however, that counterparties will be able to fully satisfy their obligations under the
contracts. The Company does not obtain collateral or other security to support financial
instruments subject to credit risk but monitors the credit standing of counterparties.
|
|
|
|
Market risk is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a
change in interest rates or currency exchange rates. The market risk associated with interest
rate contracts is managed by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and
degree of market risk that may be undertaken.
|
|
|
|
The amounts related to derivative instruments which are subject to credit risk are generally
limited to the amounts, if any, by which a counterpartys obligations exceed the obligations of
the Company with that counterparty.
|
18
|
|
On the date a derivative contract is entered into, the Company will consider if the derivative
instrument is part of a hedging relationship. Once a hedging relationship is established, the
Company designates the derivative as either a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or
liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (fair value hedge), a hedge of a forecasted
transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized
asset or liability (cash flow hedge), or a foreign currency fair value or cash flow hedge
(foreign currency hedge). The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging
instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for
undertaking various hedge transactions, at the hedges inception. This process includes
linking all derivatives that are designated as fair value, cash flow, or foreign currency
hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments
or forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedges inception
and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are
highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items.
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are highly effective and that are designated and
qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in earnings, along with the loss or gain on the
hedged assets or liabilities or unrecognized firm commitment of the hedged item that are
attributable to the hedged risks. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are highly
effective and that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recorded in other
comprehensive income (loss) until earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of
the designated hedged items. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are highly
effective as hedges and that are designated and qualify as foreign currency hedges are
recorded in either earnings or other comprehensive income (loss), depending on whether the
hedge transaction is a fair-value hedge or a cash flow hedge. Changes in the fair value of
derivative instruments that are not designated as part of a hedging relationship are reported
in current period earnings.
|
|
|
|
The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it determines that a derivative
is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged
item, the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, the derivative is
de-designated as a hedging instrument because it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction
will occur, a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment, or
management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer
appropriate. When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined that the
derivative no longer qualifies as an effective fair-value hedge, the Company no longer adjusts
the hedged asset or liability for changes in fair value. The adjustment of the carrying amount
of the hedged asset or liability is accounted for in the same manner as other components of
the carrying amount of that asset or liability. When hedge accounting is discontinued because
the hedged item no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment, the Company removes any
asset or liability that was recorded pursuant to recognition of the firm commitment from the
balance sheet and recognizes any gain or loss in earnings. When hedge accounting is
discontinued because it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur, gains and
losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss) are recognized immediately
in earnings. In all situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued, the Company
continues to carry the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet, and recognizes any
changes in its fair value in earnings.
|
|
|
|
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to manage identified foreign currency risks
resulting from its foreign currency purchase contracts or relating to groups of forecasted
foreign currency denominated payments. Most of these foreign currency forward contracts are
formally designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges which match the terms of the
individual foreign currency exposures. As a result, any ineffectiveness of the Companys hedges
is negligible. The maximum tenure for these transactions is 18 months. Amounts included in
other comprehensive income (loss) related to hedges of foreign currency purchase contracts are
reclassified into earnings (Cost of revenue) upon the commencement of depreciation of the
asset related to the purchase contracts over the remaining useful life of the asset.
|
|
|
|
There are certain foreign currency forward contracts and embedded foreign currency derivatives
in purchase contracts which are not formally designated as hedges. These certain foreign
currency forward contracts relate to groups of forecasted foreign currency denominated
payments and a portion of the proceeds of the rights offerings which are primarily denominated
in Singapore dollars. While the Company expects the forward contracts which have not been formally
designated as hedges to be effective in hedging the variability in cash flows resulting from
changes in foreign exchange rates, it does not believe it is practicable to formally document
the hedging relationship and link the derivatives to specific forecasted transactions. The
embedded foreign currency derivatives are in purchase contracts for which payments are
denominated in currencies other than the functional currency or the local currency of the
parties to the contracts or, in some cases, their parent company where the parent company
provides the majority of resources required under the contract on behalf of the subsidiary who
is a party to the contract. Gains and losses on these certain foreign currency forward
contracts and embedded foreign currency derivatives in purchase contracts are included in
Other operating expenses, net. The Company does not have any fair value hedges as of
September 30, 2009.
|
19
|
|
The table below provides information about the Companys derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Instrument
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
as of September 30, 2009
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
Rate/Price
|
|
Maturity
|
Forward Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Receive Yen/Pay US$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yen Forward Contracts
|
|
|
5,148,755
|
|
|
93.7331/USD
|
|
|
2009/2010
|
|
(Receive S$/Pay US$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SGD Forward Contracts
|
|
|
42,574
|
|
|
1.4191/USD
|
|
|
2009
|
|
(Receive Euro/Pay US$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro Forward Contracts
|
|
|
25,767
|
|
|
1.4145/Euro
|
|
|
2009/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominated in Yen
|
|
|
368,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the fair values and locations of derivative instruments recorded
in the balance sheet as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
Assets Derivatives
|
|
Liabilities Derivatives
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments under ASC 815-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
3,754
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as
hedging instruments under ASC 815-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments under ASC 815-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Other contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
337
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments under ASC 815-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the effect of derivative instruments on other comprehensive
income (loss) (OCI) and results of operations for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
|
for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
|
Amount of Gains
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
|
OCI on
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
|
|
(Effective
|
|
|
(Effective
|
|
|
(Effective
|
|
|
|
Portion)
|
|
|
Portion)
|
|
|
Portion)
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging
Instruments under ASC 815-10
Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
(441
|
)
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
|
|
for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Location of
|
|
|
Amount of Gains
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
|
OCI on
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
|
OCI into Income
|
|
|
|
(Effective
|
|
|
(Effective
|
|
|
(Effective
|
|
|
|
Portion)
|
|
|
Portion)
|
|
|
Portion)
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging
Instruments under ASC 815-10 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
|
|
No amount of ineffectiveness was recorded in the condensed consolidated statements
of operations for these designated cash flow hedges and all components of each
derivatives gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
|
|
|
The net unrealized cash flow hedging gains (losses) are not
adjusted for income taxes because such gains (losses)
are not taxable (deductible) to the Company under relevant tax laws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
|
|
|
Nine months
|
|
|
|
Location of Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
Hedging Instruments under ASC
815-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other operating expenses, net
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
Other contracts
|
|
Other operating expenses, net
|
|
$
|
(232
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to derivative and
hedging activities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
Beginning
|
|
$
|
(1,144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,593
|
)
|
Reclassification of cash flow hedging losses into earnings
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on change in cash flow
hedging fair values
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
$
|
(1,305
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
14.
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
|
|
In 2008, the Company adopted ASC 820-10 on fair value measurements and disclosures, except for
certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are not recorded at fair value
on a recurring basis as described in ASC 820-10-65-1. The Company adopted ASC 820-10 for these
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities in the first quarter of 2009. In the second
quarter of 2009, the Company adopted ASC 820-10-65-4 which relates to determining fair value
when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased
and identifying transactions that are not orderly.
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the Companys financial assets and financial liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 and the amounts as they correspond
to the respective level within the fair value hierarchy established by ASC 820-10 on fair
value measurements and disclosures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
Significant
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities (See Note 7)
|
|
$
|
1,175
|
|
|
$
|
1,175
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
4,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Embedded derivatives
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities are recorded at fair value, which is based on quoted market prices in
active markets.
|
|
|
|
The fair values of forward foreign exchange contracts are determined using quantitative
models, which use multiple market inputs including interest rates, prices and maturity dates
to generate pricing curves, which are used to value the positions. The market inputs are
generally actively quoted and can be validated through external sources, including brokers.
For forward foreign exchange contract asset and liability positions with maturity dates which
fall between the dates of quoted prices, interpolation of rate or maturity scenarios are used
in determining fair values.
|
|
|
|
The fair values of embedded derivatives are determined in a similar manner as forward foreign
exchange contracts, except that the Company makes certain assumptions about the maturity dates
of such embedded derivatives as maturity dates are generally not included in the host
contracts.
|
|
|
|
The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements for the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
derivatives
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 1, 2009:
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Total gains (losses)
(realized/unrealized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings (other
operating
expenses, net)
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Included in other
comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,688
|
|
|
|
3,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009:
|
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,027
|
|
|
$
|
3,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of total gains or
losses for the period
included in earnings
attributable to the change
in unrealized gains
(losses) relating to
assets/(liabilities) still
held at reporting date
|
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements for the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
derivatives
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2009:
|
|
$
|
(469
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
(505
|
)
|
Total gains (losses)
(realized/unrealized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings (other
operating
expenses, net)
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Included in other
comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009:
|
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,027
|
|
|
$
|
3,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of total gains or
losses for the period
included in earnings
attributable to the change
in unrealized gains
(losses) relating to
assets/(liabilities) still
held at reporting date
|
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2009, the Company adopted ASC 825-10-65-1 which requires the Company
to provide disclosures in interim reporting periods about the fair value of financial
instruments, including those financial instruments for which the Company did not elect the fair
value option, which are within the scope of ASC 825-10 on financial instruments.
|
|
|
|
Fair values of other financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated fair
|
|
|
amount
|
|
fair value
|
|
amount
|
|
value
|
Asset/(Liability)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments (see Note 9)
|
|
$
|
19,634
|
|
|
$
|
19,634
|
|
|
$
|
4,097
|
|
|
$
|
4,376
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,760,344
|
)
|
|
|
(1,557,853
|
)
|
|
|
(1,774,588
|
)
|
|
|
(1,750,978
|
)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, related party receivables and payables,
accounts receivable, other current receivables, accounts payable and other current payables.
The carrying amounts approximate fair value in view of the short-term nature of these
balances.
|
|
|
|
Other investments.
The fair value is assessed by utilizing market prices as provided by
independent pricing services, or when such prices are not available, by using a valuation
approach based on the current investment ratings, valuation parameters and estimates of the
underlying debt and securities, redemptions and the subsequent distribution of cash.
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt.
The fair value is estimated based on the type of loan and maturity. The
Company uses valuations from brokers when available, and when these are not available, the
Company estimates the fair value using market interest rates for its debts with similar
maturities.
|
|
|
|
Limitations.
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, and are based on
relevant market information and information about the financial instruments. These estimates
are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and
therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly
affect the estimates.
|
23
|
|
|
15.
|
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
|
|
|
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. SFAS
No. 166 removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125 and removes the exception from applying FASB
Interpretations (FIN) No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
,
to qualifying
special-purpose entities. SFAS No. 166 clarifies that one objective of SFAS No. 140 is to
determine whether a transferor and all of the entities included in the transferors financial
statements being presented have surrendered control over transferred financial assets. SFAS No.
166 also modifies the financial-components approach used in SFAS No. 140 and limits the
circumstances in which a financial asset, or portion of a financial asset, should be
derecognized when the transferor has not transferred the entire original financial asset to an
entity that is not consolidated with the transferor in the financial statements being presented
and/or when the transferor has continuing involvement with the transferred financial asset.
SFAS No. 166 also defines the term participating interest to establish specific conditions for
reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale. SFAS No. 166 requires that a
transferor recognize and initially measure at fair value all assets obtained (including a
transferors beneficial interest) and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer of
financial assets accounted for as a sale. Enhanced disclosures are also required by SFAS No.
166. SFAS No. 166 must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first interim
and annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. SFAS No. 166 must be applied
to transfers occurring on or after the effective date. The Company is currently assessing the
impact of adopting SFAS No. 166, which was subsequently codified in ASC 860-10.
|
|
|
|
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS
No. 167 addresses the (1) the effects on certain provisions of FIN 46(R), as a result of the
elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in SFAS No. 166, and (2)
constituent concerns about the application of certain key provisions of FIN 46(R), including
those in which the accounting and disclosures under FIN 46(R) do not always provide timely and
useful information about an enterprises involvement in a variable interest. SFAS No. 167
retains the scope of FIN 46(R) with the addition of entities previously considered qualifying
special-purpose entities, as the concept of these entities was eliminated in SFAS No. 166. SFAS
No. 167 shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first interim and
annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. Earlier application is prohibited.
The Company is currently assessing the impact of adopting SFAS
No. 167, which was subsequently
codified in ASC 810-10.
|
|
|
|
In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities
at Fair Value (ASU 2009-05). The update provides clarification for circumstances in which a
quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available. ASU 2009-05 is
effective for the first reporting period (including interim period) beginning after issuance.
The Company is currently assessing the impact of adopting ASU 2009-05.
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13 (ASU 2009-13)
addressing arrangements with multiple deliverables. ASU 2009-13 contains the amendments made
to the FASBs ASC for the final consensus reached by the EITF in Issue No. 08-1, Revenue
Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, which addresses how to determine whether an
arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting, and how
the arrangement consideration should be allocated among the separate units of accounting. ASU
2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially
modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The
Company is currently assessing the impact of adopting ASU 2009-13.
|
|
|
The Company has evaluated and given effect to ASC 855-10 on subsequent events, up through to
October 30, 2009, being the issuance date of these unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements.
|
24
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of net revenue for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
85.9
|
|
|
|
78.8
|
|
|
|
84.7
|
|
|
|
90.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenue
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Other operating expenses, net
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses, net
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of associated companies, net
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Other income (loss), net
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt discount
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(16.2
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to the
noncontrolling interest in CSP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Chartered
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)
|
Less: Accretion to redemption value of
convertible redeemable preference shares
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to ordinary
shareholders of Chartered
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
(15.0
|
)%
|
The following table sets forth a breakdown of revenue by market sector for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
Communications
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
Computer
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth a breakdown of revenue by geographical region for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
Americas
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
Europe
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
The following table sets forth a breakdown of revenue by technology (micron) for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
0.045 and below
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Up to 0.065
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Up to 0.09
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Up to 0.13
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Up to 0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Up to 0.18
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Up to 0.25
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Up to 0.35
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Above 0.35
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
Net revenue
We derive revenue primarily from fabricating semiconductor wafers and, to a lesser extent, from
providing associated subcontracted assembly and test services as well as pre-fabrication services
such as mask generation and engineering services. We enter into arrangements with our customers
which typically include some or all of the above deliverables. As a dedicated foundry, our
financial performance, including our revenue, largely depends on a number of factors including
timeliness in introducing technology and manufacturing solutions, ability to enter into
arrangements with diverse customers for high volume production of wafers, utilization of our
production capacity, and external factors such as pricing and general semiconductor market
conditions and industry cycles.
Net revenue decreased by 10.4% from $463.6 million in the third quarter of 2008 to $415.2 million
in the third quarter of 2009, due primarily to a significant decline in semiconductor demand
across all sectors as a result of the global economic contraction. Total wafer shipments decreased
by 12.6% from 514,318 wafers (eight-inch equivalent) in the third quarter of 2008 to 449,349
wafers (eight-inch equivalent) in the third quarter of 2009. Average selling price (ASP) remained similar at $878
and $879 per wafer (eight-inch equivalent) for the third quarter of 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Included in our revenue and gross profit for the third quarter of 2009 was income of $8.9 million
relating to unfulfilled purchase obligations by certain customers. There was no such income for
the third quarter of 2008.
Revenue from our 0.13um and below technologies represented 58% of our net revenue in the third
quarter of 2008 as compared to 70% of our net revenue in the third quarter of 2009. In terms of
absolute dollars, such revenue increased by 8% between the third quarters of 2008 and 2009, due
primarily to higher shipments of 65nm products. Revenue from our 65nm and below technologies
increased from 19% of our net revenue in the third quarter of 2008 to 33% of our net revenue in
the third quarter of 2009.
The communications sector was the highest contributor to our revenue in both the third quarters of
2008 and 2009, representing 52% and 55% of our net revenue, respectively. Despite the increase in
percentage contribution to total net revenue, in terms of absolute dollars such revenue decreased
by 5% between the third quarters of 2008 and 2009, due primarily to lower demand for devices in
mobile phone handsets, partially offset by an increase in demand for devices in wireless broadband
access. Revenue from the consumer sector remained similar at 31% of our net revenue in the third
quarter of 2008 and 30% of our net revenue in the third quarter of 2009. Despite the similar
percentage contribution to total net revenue, in terms of absolute dollars such revenue decreased
by 13% between the third quarters of 2008 and 2009, due primarily to lower demand for video game
devices and devices in Digital Video Disc (DVD) players, partially offset by an increase in
demand for devices for televisions. Revenue from the computer sector decreased from 13% of our net
revenue in the third quarter of 2008 to 10% of our net revenue in the third quarter of 2009. In
terms of absolute dollars, such revenue decreased by 31% between the third quarters of 2008 and
2009, due primarily to a decrease in demand for devices in personal computers peripherals,
printers and monitors.
The Americas region was the highest contributor to our revenue for both the third quarters of 2008
and 2009, representing 62% and 55% of our net revenue, respectively. In terms of absolute dollars,
such revenue decreased by 21% between the third quarters of 2008 and 2009, due primarily to a
decrease in demand for video game devices and devices for mobile phone handsets, partially offset
by an increase in demand for devices in wireless broadband access. Revenue contribution from the
Asia-Pacific region increased from 19% of our net revenue in the third quarter of 2008 to 30% of
our net revenue in the third quarter of 2009. In terms of absolute dollars such revenue increased
by 41% between the third quarters of 2008 and 2009, due primarily to an increase in demand for
devices for televisions. Revenue contribution from the Japan region decreased from 9% of our net
revenue for the third quarter of 2008 to 5% of our net revenue for the third quarter of 2009. In
terms of absolute dollars, such revenue decreased by 50% between the third quarters of 2008 and
2009, due primarily to a decrease in demand for devices in mobile phone handsets.
26
Revenue from the
Europe region remained similar in terms of percentage contribution to our net revenue at 10% for
both the third quarters of 2008 and 2009. Despite having similar percentage contributions to total
net revenue, in terms of absolute dollars there was a 10% decrease in our net revenue in the
second quarter of 2009, due primarily to a decrease in demand for devices in media and audio
players and recorders.
Cost of revenue
Cost of revenue includes attributed overheads, depreciation expense, cost of labor and materials,
subcontracted expenses for assembly and test services, mask generation costs and amortization of
certain technology licenses. Generally, a large proportion of our cost of revenue is fixed in
nature, which does not increase or decrease in proportion to any change in our shipments. The unit
cost of a wafer decreases as fixed overhead charges, such as depreciation expense on the facility
and semiconductor manufacturing equipment, are allocated over a larger number of wafers produced.
Cost of revenue decreased by 17.8% from $398.1 million in the third quarter of 2008 to $327.3
million in the third quarter of 2009, due primarily to the decrease in shipments by 12.6% and
lower cost per wafer. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we revised the estimated useful lives of our
twelve-inch process equipment and machinery from five years to eight years, and the related
mechanical and electrical installations from ten years to fifteen years. In connection with the
change in depreciable lives, the expected salvage values of the related process equipment and
machinery were reduced to zero to
reflect the longer useful lives of this equipment. The change in estimated useful lives and
salvage values is a change in accounting estimate that was applied prospectively from October 1,
2008. The impact of this change was a reduction to our cost of revenue by $27.1 million for the
third quarter of 2009, compared with the third quarter of 2008.
Cost per wafer shipped decreased by 6.5% from $761 (eight-inch equivalent) in the third quarter of
2008 to $712 (eight-inch equivalent) in the third quarter of 2009, due primarily to higher
production volumes in certain advanced technologies over which fixed costs are allocated. We
recorded a net charge to earnings of $3.7 million relating to unabsorbed overheads due to
significantly lower utilization of manufacturing assets in the third quarter of 2009.
We record grants as a reduction of the expenses that the grants are intended to reimburse. Grants
recorded as a reduction to our cost of revenue were $1.5 million and $2.7 million for the third
quarters of 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Gross profit
Our gross profit increased from $65.6 million, or 14.1% of our net revenue, in the third quarter
of 2008 to $88.0 million, or 21.2% of our net revenue, in the third quarter of 2009. The increase
was primarily due to a favorable product mix arising from higher shipments of certain advanced
technologies and lower cost per wafer resulting from higher production volumes in these advanced
technologies over which fixed costs are allocated, partially offset by lower selling prices.
Included in our revenue and gross profit for the third quarter of 2009 was income of $8.9 million
relating to unfulfilled purchase obligations by certain customers. There was no such income for
the third quarter of 2008. The revision in estimated useful lives of our twelve-inch process
equipment and machinery and the related mechanical and electrical installations which was applied
prospectively from October 1, 2008 as mentioned above improved our gross profit by $27.1 million
in the third quarter of 2009 over that of the third quarter of 2008.
Our gross profit was also impacted by grants of $1.5 million and $2.7 million for the third
quarters of 2008 and 2009, respectively, which were recorded as a reduction to our cost of
revenue.
Other revenue
Other revenue consists primarily of rental income and management fees. Other revenue decreased
from $2.7 million in the third quarter of 2008 to $2.3 million in the third quarter of 2009, due
primarily to lower management fees in the third quarter of 2009.
Research and development expenses
Research and development (R&D) expenses consist primarily of our share of expenses related to
joint-development projects with IBM, Infineon, Samsung, ST Microelectronics and Toshiba,
payroll-related costs for R&D personnel, depreciation of R&D equipment and expenses related to the
development of design kits and intellectual property solutions for advanced technologies.
R&D expenses decreased by 0.7% from $44.2 million in the third quarter of 2008 to $43.9 million in
the third quarter of 2009. This was due primarily to lower depreciation on R&D equipment and lower
payroll-related expenses, partially offset by lower reimbursement of expenses from grants and
higher cost of development activities related to the advanced 32nm and 28nm technologies. R&D
expenses as a percentage of net revenue in the third quarters of 2008 and 2009 were 9.5% and
10.6%, respectively.
Grants recorded as a reduction to our R&D expenses were $3.6 million and $1.2 million in the third
quarters of 2008 and 2009, respectively.
27
Sales and marketing expenses
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of payroll-related costs for sales and marketing
personnel, electronic design automation (EDA)-related expenses and costs related to pre-contract
customer design validation activities. EDA-related expenses and costs related to pre-contract
customer design validation activities relate to efforts to attract new customers and to expand our
existing base of customers.
Sales and marketing expenses decreased by 23.5% from $19.5 million in the third quarter of 2008 to
$14.9 million in the third quarter of 2009, due primarily to
lower EDA expenses, lower costs related to pre-contract customer design validation activities, and
lower payroll-related expenses. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we revised the estimated useful
lives of certain technology-related intangible assets from three to five years. The change was
made to better reflect the expected pattern of economic benefits from the use of the assets over
time based on an analysis of historical usage experience and the expected future usage of the
underlying technology. The change in estimated useful lives is a change in accounting estimate
that was applied prospectively from October 1, 2008. The impact of this change was a reduction to
our sales and marketing expenses of $1.1 million in the third quarter of 2009. Sales and marketing
expenses as a percentage of net revenue in the third quarters of 2008 and 2009 were 4.2% and 3.6%,
respectively.
Grants recorded as a reduction to our sales and marketing expenses were $0.1 million and $0.2
million in the third quarters of 2008 and 2009, respectively.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative (G&A) expenses consist primarily of payroll-related costs for
administrative personnel, external fees such as consultancy, legal, administrative, professional
and regulatory fees, and depreciation of equipment used in G&A activities.
G&A expenses increased by 65.1% from $11.2 million in the third quarter of 2008 to $18.5 million
in the third quarter of 2009, due primarily to investment banking and legal fees and other
expenses of $8.4 million related to the proposed acquisition by ATIC. G&A expenses as a
percentage of net revenue in the third quarters of 2008 and 2009 were 2.4% and 4.5%, respectively.
Grants recorded as a reduction to our G&A expenses was $0.3 million in the third quarter of 2009.
There were no grants recorded as a reduction to our G&A expenses in the third quarter of 2008.
Other operating expenses, net
Other operating expenses, net, increased from $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2008 to $6.5
million in the third quarter of 2009. In 2006, in order to obtain guaranteed capacity in a
vendors facility, we placed a deposit with the vendor which is to be repaid upon cessation of the
arrangement. An asset was consequently recorded for the guaranteed capacity in the vendors
facility. Due to the planned closure of their facility, we recorded an accounting charge of $3.2 million relating to the write down of the guaranteed capacity in the vendors facility in the third quarter of 2009. The deposit is also expected to be repayable by the vendor in January 2010. In addition, we recorded higher foreign exchange losses of $2.4 million in the third
quarter of 2009.
Equity in income of associated companies, net
Equity in income of SMP increased from $8.7 million in the third quarter of 2008 to $8.9 million
in the third quarter of 2009, due primarily to higher revenues resulting from higher shipments and
lower cost per wafer resulting from higher production volumes over which fixed costs are
allocated, partially offset by lower selling prices. As with the results of our majority-owned
fabs, the equity in income of SMP can have a material effect on our results of operations. In the
third quarter of 2008, the equity in income of SMP was $8.7 million compared to our total loss
before income tax of $13.6 million. In the third quarter of 2009, the equity in income of SMP was
$8.9 million compared to our total income before income tax of $2.6 million.
We have provided the following information on our total business base revenue, which includes our
share of SMP revenue, for the third quarters of 2008 and 2009. Chartereds share of SMP revenue,
and net revenue including Chartereds share of SMP, presented in the following table are non-U.S.
GAAP financial measures. We have included this information because SMP can have a material effect
on our consolidated statements of operations and we believe that it is useful to provide
information on our share of SMP revenue in proportion to our total business base revenue. However,
SMP is a minority-owned joint venture company that is not consolidated under U.S. GAAP. We account for our 49.0%
investment in SMP using the equity method. Under our strategic alliance agreement with LSI
Technology (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (LSI Singapore), the parties do not share SMPs net results in
the same ratio as the equity holdings. Instead, each party is entitled to the gross profits
(losses) from sales to the customers that it directs to SMP, after deducting its share of the
overhead costs of SMP. Accordingly, we account for our share of SMPs net results based on the
gross profits (losses) from sales to the customers that we direct to SMP, after deducting our
share of the overhead costs. The following table provides a reconciliation showing comparable data
based on net revenue determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which does not include our share of
SMP:
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
Net revenue (U.S. GAAP)
|
|
$
|
463.7
|
|
|
$
|
415.2
|
|
Chartereds share of SMP revenue
|
|
$
|
23.5
|
|
|
$
|
24.6
|
|
Net revenue including Chartereds share of SMP
|
|
$
|
487.2
|
|
|
$
|
439.8
|
|
The following table provides information that indicates the effect of SMPs operations on some of
our non-U.S. GAAP performance indicators:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
Including
|
|
Excluding
|
|
Including
|
|
|
Chartered's
|
|
Chartered's
|
|
Chartered's
|
|
Chartered's
|
|
|
Share of SMP
|
|
Share of SMP
|
|
Share of SMP
|
|
Share of SMP
|
Shipments (in thousands)*
|
|
|
514
|
.3
|
|
|
544
|
.5
|
|
|
449
|
.3
|
|
|
482
|
.4
|
ASP per wafer
|
|
$
|
878
|
|
|
$
|
873
|
|
|
$
|
879
|
|
|
$
|
870
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
|
|
*
|
|
Eight-inch equivalent wafers
|
In the first quarter of 2007, we acquired a 26.7% equity interest in Gateway Silicon Inc. (GSI).
We had been accounting for the investment in GSI under the equity method. The equity in the loss
of GSI was $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2008. The investment in GSI has been reduced to
zero as of December 31, 2008. As we have no further obligations with respect to our investment in
GSI, we discontinued accounting for our share of the losses in GSI from the first quarter of 2009.
On May 11, 2009, GSI carried out a fund raising exercise to raise net proceeds of NTD97.5 million,
approximately US$2.9 million by way of issuing 9.75 million of common stock at NTD10 each.
Following the fund raising exercise, our shareholding in GSI decreased from 26.7% to 5.8%. As we
no longer have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial
policies of GSI as of that date, we discontinued accounting for its ownership interest in GSI
using the equity method and henceforth accounted for the investment as a cost method investment.
In the second quarter of 2008, we acquired a 36.8% equity interest in Socle Technology Corporation
(Socle). We have accounted for the investment in Socle under the equity method from June 2008
onwards. Socles net operating results are shared between Chartered and Socles shareholders in
the same ratio as the equity holdings. The equity in the income of Socle was $0.3 million in the
third quarter of 2008. The equity in the loss of Socle in the third quarter of 2009 was
insignificant.
Other income (loss), net
Other income (loss), net, was a net loss of $0.9 million in the third quarter of 2008 compared to
a net income of $0.5 million in the third quarter 2009. The net loss in the third quarter of 2008
was due primarily to an other-than-temporary impairment loss of $0.4 million on securities
classified as available-for-sale and $0.4 million on other investments. The net income in the
third quarter of 2009 was due primarily to a realized gain of $0.5 million on the redemption from
the Fund.
Interest income
Interest income increased by 5.1% from $3.0 million in the third quarter of 2008 to $3.1 million
in the third quarter of 2009, due primarily to the recognition of an accelerated amount of $2.2
million in imputed interest on the deposit placed with a vendor for guaranteed capacity in the
vendors facility. Due to the planned closure of their facility, the deposit is expected to be
repayable by the vendor in January 2010. Excluding the $2.2 million, interest income decreased due
primarily to lower interest rates, partially offset by higher average cash balances.
Interest expense and amortization of debt discount
Interest expense and amortization of debt discount decreased by 1.1% from $16.6 million in the
third quarter of 2008 to $16.4 million in the third quarter of 2009, due primarily to lower
interest rates on outstanding floating rate debt, partially offset by lower interest
capitalization associated with capital expenditures related to our 65nm and below technologies and
higher average outstanding debt balances.
29
Income tax expense (benefit)
We currently pay tax on (1) interest income, (2) rental income, (3) sales of wafers using
technologies that do not benefit from preferential tax treatment and (4) other income not
specifically exempted from income tax. In computing the income tax expense for each quarter (other
than the last quarter of a fiscal year), we apply an estimated annual effective tax rate (ETR)
to income (loss) before income tax to derive the income tax expense (benefit) for the quarter. ETR
is calculated as a percentage of the forecast income tax expense for the year over the forecast
income before income tax for the same period.
In the third quarter of 2008, we recorded an income tax expense of $10.8 million on a loss before
income tax of $13.6 million. The income tax expense recorded in the third quarter of 2008 arose
primarily from the provision of additional valuation allowance on a portion of existing deferred
tax assets which were assessed, based on projection of future taxable income, to be not realizable.
Such future taxable income is based on our projection which is contingent upon future market
conditions. In the third quarter of 2009, we recorded an income tax benefit of $0.1 million on an
income before income tax of $2.6 million.
Net income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest in CSP
Net income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest in CSP in the third quarter of 2009
arises from the adoption of ASC 810-10-65-1 on noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial
statements which became effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Prior to the adoption of the aforementioned ASC, none
of CSPs losses were allocated to the noncontrolling interest in the consolidated statements of
operations as the obligations of the noncontrolling interest were reduced to zero in the first
quarter of 2003, due to cumulative losses. When there were profits applicable to the
noncontrolling interest in CSP subsequently, such profits were taken to the consolidated
statements of operation until the noncontrolling interests share of losses previously recorded in
the consolidated statements of operation was fully recovered.
Accretion to redemption value of convertible redeemable preference shares
In the third quarter of 2005, 30,000 convertible redeemable preference shares were issued. We
accrete the carrying amounts of the convertible redeemable preference shares to their redemption
values at maturity and record such accretion using the effective interest method over the
remaining period until the maturity date on August 17, 2010. Such accretion adjusts net income
(loss) available to ordinary shareholders of Chartered. Accretion charges were $2.5 million and
$2.6 million in the third quarters of 2008 and 2009, respectively.
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
Net revenue
Net revenue decreased by 23.0% from $1,309.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
to $1,008.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily to a significant
decline in semiconductor demand across all sectors as a result of the global economic contraction.
Total wafer shipments decreased by 28.6% from 1,456,438 wafers (eight-inch equivalent) for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 to 1,039,403 wafers (eight-inch equivalent) for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. Fab 3E, which was acquired on March 31, 2008, contributed $82.2
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $83.2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. ASP increased by 3.1% from $877 per wafer (eight-inch equivalent)
to $904 per wafer (eight-inch equivalent) over the same period, due primarily to a more favorable
product mix arising from higher shipments of products from our 65nm and below technologies.
Revenue from our 0.13um and below technologies represented 55% of our net revenue for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to 68% of our net revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. Despite the increase in percentage contribution to total net revenue, in terms
of absolute dollars, such revenue decreased by 5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
due primarily to the lower shipments of 0.13um technology, partially offset by higher shipments of
65nm products. Revenue from our 65nm and below technologies increased from 15% of our net revenue
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to 30% of our net revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. Included in our revenue and gross profit for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 was income of $32.3 million relating to unfulfilled purchase obligations by certain
customers. There was no such income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The communications sector was the highest contributor to our revenue for both the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, representing 50% and 52% of our net revenue, respectively.
Despite the increase in percentage contribution to total net revenue, in terms of absolute
dollars, such revenue decreased by 20% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily
to lower demand for devices in mobile phone handsets. Revenue from the consumer sector increased
from 32% of our net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to 35% of our net revenue
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Despite the increase in percentage contribution to
total net revenue, in terms of absolute dollars, this was a 16% decrease from our net revenue for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, due primarily to a decrease in demand for video game
devices and devices in DVD players, partially offset by increase in demand for devices in
television. Revenue from the computer sector decreased from 14% of our net revenue for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 to 8% of our net revenue for the
30
nine months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily to a decrease in demand for devices in
personal computers peripherals, printers and monitors.
The Americas region was the highest contributor to our revenue for both the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009, representing 64% and 55% of our net revenue, respectively. The
decrease was due primarily to a decrease in demand for mobile phone handsets related devices and
video game devices. Revenue contribution from the Asia-Pacific region increased from 21% of our
net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to 28% of our net revenue for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily to increase in demand for devices in television.
Revenue contribution from the Japan region increased from 6% of our net revenue for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 to 8% of our net revenue for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, due primarily to revenue contribution from Fab 3E for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 as compared to a six month period revenue contribution for the nine months ended September
30, 2008. Revenue from the Europe region remained similar in terms of percentage contribution to
our net revenue at 9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Despite
having similar percentage contribution to total net revenue, in terms of absolute dollars, there
was a 23% decrease from our net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, due
primarily to a decrease in demand for devices in media and audio players and recorders.
Cost of revenue
Cost of revenue decreased by 17.4% from $1,109.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 to $916.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily to the decrease
in shipments by 28.6% over the same period. Fab 3E, which was acquired on March 31, 2008,
contributed $81.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $90.0 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we revised the
estimated useful lives of our twelve-inch process equipment and machinery from five years to eight
years, and the related mechanical and electrical installations from ten years to fifteen years. In
connection with the change in depreciable lives, the expected salvage values of the related
process equipment and machinery were reduced to zero to reflect the longer useful lives of this
equipment. The change in estimated useful lives and salvage values is a change in accounting
estimate that was applied prospectively from October 1, 2008. The impact of this change was a
reduction to our cost of revenue by $73.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Cost per wafer shipped increased by 15.0% from $749 (eight-inch equivalent) for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 to $861 (eight-inch equivalent) for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, due primarily to higher mix of advanced technologies which typically incur higher costs, and
lower production volumes over which fixed costs are allocated. We recorded a net charge to
earnings of $3.7 million relating to unabsorbed overheads due to significantly lower utilization
of manufacturing assets in the third quarter of 2009.
We record grants as a reduction of the expenses that the grants are intended to reimburse. Grants
recorded as a reduction to our cost of revenue were $3.3 million and $9.7 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Gross profit
Our gross profit decreased from $200.0 million, or 15.3% of our net revenue, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 to $91.4 million, or 9.1% of our net revenue, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. This was due primarily to lower revenues resulting from lower shipments and
higher cost per wafer resulting from higher mix of advanced technologies which typically incur
higher costs, and lower production volumes over which fixed costs are allocated, partially offset
by higher ASP resulting from a favorable product mix. Included in our revenue and gross profit for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was income of $32.3 million relating to unfulfilled
purchase obligations by certain customers. There was no such income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. The revision in estimated useful lives of our twelve-inch process equipment
and machinery and the related mechanical and electrical installations which was applied
prospectively from October 1, 2008 as mentioned above improved our gross profit by $73.8 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 over that for the nine months ended September 30,
2008.
Our gross profit was also impacted by grants of $3.3 million and $9.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively, which were recorded as a reduction to our cost of
revenue.
Other revenue
Other revenue decreased from $11.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to $6.2
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily to lower rental income from
SMP and lower management fees. The rental charged to SMP is arrived at based on the terms of the
original joint-venture agreement, which is a function of recovering the cost of the building and
facility machinery and equipment over the period of the joint-venture agreement. The lower rental
starting from second quarter 2008 reflects our recovery of the majority of these costs over the
initial 10 years of the joint venture agreement.
31
Research and development expenses
R&D expenses increased by 3.9% from $132.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to
$137.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This was due primarily to higher cost
of development activities related to the advanced 32nm and 28nm technology nodes and lower
reimbursement of expenses related to grants, partially offset by lower payroll-related expenses.
R&D expenses as a percentage of net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009
were 10.1% and 13.7%, respectively.
Grants recorded as a reduction to our R&D expenses were $10.8 million and $4.6 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Sales and marketing expenses
Sales and marketing expenses decreased by 24.6% from $54.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 to $41.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily to
lower costs related to pre-contract customer design validation activities, lower payroll-related
expenses, and lower EDA expenses. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we revised the estimated useful
lives of certain technology-related intangible assets from three to five years. The change was
made to better reflect the expected pattern of economic benefits from the use of the assets over
time based on an analysis of historical usage experience and the expected future usage of the
underlying technology. The change in estimated useful lives is a change in accounting estimate
that was applied prospectively from October 1, 2008. The impact of this change was a reduction to
our sales and marketing expenses of $3.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of net revenue for the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009 were 4.2% and 4.1%, respectively.
Grants recorded as a reduction to our sales and marketing expenses were $0.1 million and $0.8
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
General and administrative expenses
G&A expenses increased by 19.4% from $33.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to
$39.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily to investment banking
and legal fees and other expenses of $8.4 million related to the proposed acquisition by ATIC,
partially offset by lower payroll-related expenses. G&A expenses as a percentage of net revenue
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 were 2.5% and 3.9%, respectively.
Grants recorded as a reduction to our G&A expenses was $1.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. There were no grants recorded as a reduction to our G&A expenses for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008.
Other operating expenses, net
Other operating expenses, net, increased from $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 to $15.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in other
operating expenses, net, was due primarily to $5.9 million of costs incurred for the employee
termination benefits as a result of workforce re-sizing in the first quarter of 2009. In addition,
in 2006, in order to obtain guaranteed capacity in a vendors facility, we placed a deposit with
the vendor which is to be repaid upon cessation of the arrangement. An asset was consequently
recorded for the guaranteed capacity in the vendors facility. Due to the planned closure of their facility, we recorded an accounting charge of $3.2 million relating to the write down of the guaranteed capacity in the vendors facility in the third quarter of 2009. The deposit is also expected to be repayable by the vendor in January 2010.
In addition, we recorded foreign exchange losses of $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
as compared to foreign exchange gains of $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The increase is partially offset by lower expenses by $1.2 million related to rental
property and lower fixed asset write-off by $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009.
Equity in income of associated companies, net
Equity in income of SMP decreased from $28.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
to $13.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily to lower revenues
resulting from lower shipments, lower selling prices and higher cost per wafer resulting from
lower production volume over which fixed costs are allocated. As with the results of our
majority-owned fabs, the equity in income of SMP can have a material effect on our results of
operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, the equity in income of SMP was
$28.2 million and $13.8 million, respectively, compared to our total loss before income tax of
$16.1 million and $163.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
We have provided the following information on our total business base revenue, which includes our
share of SMP revenue, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009. Chartereds share of
SMP revenue, and net revenue including Chartereds share of SMP, presented in the following table
are non-U.S. GAAP financial measures. We have included this information because SMP can have a
material effect on our consolidated statements of operations and we believe that it is useful to
provide information on our share of SMP revenue in proportion to our total business base revenue.
However, SMP is a minority-owned joint venture company that is not consolidated under U.S. GAAP.
We account for our 49.0% investment in SMP using the equity
32
method. Under our strategic alliance agreement with LSI Singapore, the parties do not share SMPs
net results in the same ratio as the equity holdings. Instead, each party is entitled to the gross
profits (losses) from sales to the customers that it directs to SMP, after deducting its share of
the overhead costs of SMP. Accordingly, we account for our share of SMPs net results based on the
gross profits (losses) from sales to the customers that we direct to SMP, after deducting our
share of the overhead costs. The following table provides a reconciliation showing comparable data
based on net revenue determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which does not include our share of
SMP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
Net revenue (U.S. GAAP)
|
|
$
|
1,309.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,008.2
|
|
Chartereds share of SMP revenue
|
|
$
|
74.4
|
|
|
$
|
54.0
|
|
Net revenue including Chartereds share of SMP
|
|
$
|
1,383.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,062.2
|
|
The following table provides information that indicates the effect of SMPs operations on some of
our non-U.S. GAAP performance indicators:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Excluding
|
|
Including
|
|
Excluding
|
|
Including
|
|
|
Chartereds
|
|
Chartereds
|
|
Chartereds
|
|
Chartereds
|
|
|
Share of SMP
|
|
Share of SMP
|
|
Share of SMP
|
|
Share of SMP
|
Shipments (in thousands)*
|
|
|
1,456
|
.4
|
|
|
1,550
|
.2
|
|
|
1,039
|
.4
|
|
|
1,109
|
.3
|
ASP per wafer
|
|
$
|
877
|
|
|
$
|
872
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
|
$
|
896
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
|
|
*
|
|
Eight-inch equivalent wafers
|
In the first quarter of 2007, we acquired a 26.7% equity interest in GSI. We had been accounting
for the investment in GSI under the equity method. The equity in the loss of GSI was $0.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The investment in GSI has been reduced to zero as of
December 31, 2008. As we have no further obligations with respect to our investment in GSI, we
discontinued accounting for our share of the losses in GSI from the first quarter of 2009.
On May 11, 2009, GSI carried out a fund raising exercise to raise net proceeds of NTD97.5 million,
approximately US$2.9 million by way of issuing 9.75 million of common stock at NTD10 each.
Following the fund raising exercise, our shareholding in GSI decreased from 26.7% to 5.8%. As we
no longer have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial
policies of GSI as of that date, we discontinued accounting for its ownership interest in GSI
using the equity method and henceforth accounted for the investment as a cost method investment.
In the second quarter of 2008, we acquired a 36.8% equity interest in Socle. We have accounted for the investment in Socle under the equity method from June 2008
onwards. Socles net operating results are shared between Chartered and Socles shareholders in
the same ratio as the equity holdings. The equity in the income of Socle for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 was $0.3 million. The equity in the loss of Socle for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was $0.5 million.
Other income (loss), net
Other income (loss), net, was a net income of $8.8 million and $0.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Other income, net, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 included the recognition of income of $11.5 million arising from our acceptance
of a licensing fee in connection with a technology licensing agreement by one of our technology
partners which was concluded during the first quarter of 2008. The amount recorded is the present
value of $12 million, which we will receive as an offset against future payments due under a
related technology agreement, and is not contingent upon any future performance requirements.
Other income, net, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 also included an
other-than-temporary impairment loss of $1.3 million on securities classified as
available-for-sale and $1.5 million on the Fund. The net income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was due primarily to a gain of $0.6 million arising from the termination of
certain warrants held and a realized gain of $0.6 million on the redemptions from the Fund,
partially offset by an other-than-temporary impairment loss of $0.4 million on securities
classified as available-for-sale.
Interest income
Interest income decreased by 50.6% from $11.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
to $5.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily to lower interest
rates, partially offset by higher average cash balances and recognition of an accelerated amount
of $2.2 million in imputed interest on the deposit placed with a vendor for guaranteed capacity in
the vendors facility. Due to the planned closure of their facility, the deposit is expected to be
repayable by the vendor in January 2010.
33
Interest expense and amortization of debt discount
Interest expense and amortization of debt discount decreased by 6.3% from $50.0 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 to $46.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, due primarily to lower interest rates on outstanding floating rate debt, partially offset by
higher average outstanding debt balances and lower interest capitalization associated with capital
expenditures related to our 65nm and below technologies.
Income tax expense (benefit)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded an income tax benefit of $37.5 million
on a loss before income tax of $16.1 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we
recorded an income tax benefit of $10.1 million on a loss before income tax of $163.1 million. The
income tax benefit recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 arose primarily from
recognition of deferred tax assets for unabsorbed wear and tear allowances and tax losses of Fab
7, which became available for carry forward subsequent to a retroactive change of tax status for
Fab 7 from pioneer to non-pioneer. This tax benefit is net of valuation allowances against a
portion of the deferred tax assets that is assessed as more likely than not to be unrealizable for
offset against future taxable income. Such future taxable income is based on our projection which
is contingent upon future market conditions. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we
recorded additional amounts of deferred tax assets due primarily to the unabsorbed wear and tear
allowances and tax losses of Fab 3E of approximately $493.2 million and $29.7 million,
respectively, which became available for carryforward upon approval from the Singapore tax
authorities in the second quarter of 2009. A net tax benefit of $10.0 million is recognized based
on a portion of the deferred tax assets that is assessed as more likely than not to be realizable
through offset against existing deferred tax liabilities. A valuation allowance is established for
the remaining deferred tax assets which are assessed as more likely than not to be unrealizable
for offset against future taxable income. Such future taxable income is based on our projection
which is contingent upon future market conditions.
Net income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest in CSP
Net income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest in CSP for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 arises from the adoption of ASC 810-10-65-1 on noncontrolling interests in
consolidated financial statements which became effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Prior to the adoption of the
aforementioned ASC, none of CSPs losses had been allocated to the noncontrolling interest in the
consolidated statements of operations as the obligations of the noncontrolling interest were
reduced to zero in the first quarter of 2003 onwards due to cumulative losses. When there were
profits applicable to the noncontrolling interest in CSP subsequently, such profits were taken to
the consolidated statements of operation until the noncontrolling interests share of losses
previously recorded in the consolidated statements of operation is fully recovered.
Accretion to redemption value of convertible redeemable preference shares
In the third quarter of 2005, 30,000 convertible redeemable preference shares were issued. We
accrete the carrying amounts of the convertible redeemable preference shares to their redemption
values at maturity and record such accretion using the effective interest method over the
remaining period until the maturity date on August 17, 2010. Such accretion adjusts net income
(loss) available to ordinary shareholders of Chartered. Accretion charges were $7.5 million and
$7.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Current and expected liquidity
As of September 30, 2009, our principal sources of
liquidity included $872.0 million in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash; and $816.2 million of
unutilized banking facilities consisting of loans and bank credit
lines. Included in the $816.2 million of unutilized banking
facilities are $41.9 million of uncommitted banking and credit
facilities, $50.0 million related to a revolving loan facility with Bank of America (BOA),
which is available for three years from April 2007 and $150.0 million related to a revolving loan
facility with Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC), Citibank, N.A., Singapore Branch and
Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch (Deutsche), which is available until June 30, 2010. The remaining unutilized banking facilities are available for drawdown only for purposes of financing
the purchases of equipment from certain vendors in accordance with designated schedules set forth
under the applicable facility agreements.
Based on our current level of operations, we
believe that our cash on hand, existing working capital, planned use of existing credit facilities,
including the plan to renew the revolving loan facilities with BOA
and with SMBC, Citibank N.A., Singapore Branch and Deutsche upon
their expiration in April 2010 and June 2010, respectively, credit terms with our vendors and projected
cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our capital and R&D expenditures, debt
service obligations, investment and current liquidity needs for at least the next twelve months.
Depending on the pace of our future growth
and technology upgrades and migration, we may require additional
financing from time to time, including for purposes of funding the
capital expenditures for our manufacturing facilities. See the
Liquidity and Capital Resources Historic investing
cash flows and capital expenditures section below for more details on our capital expenditures. We
believe in maintaining maximum flexibility when it comes to financing our business. We regularly
evaluate our current and future financing needs and may take advantage of favorable market
conditions to raise additional financing. Please refer to the discussion below on the availability
and requirements of the banking facilities in the event that Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited (Temasek)
ceases to, directly or indirectly, control the Company, own at least
30% of the ordinary shares of the Company
or be the single largest owner of the Company.
34
The following shows long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Floating rate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$653,131 EXIM Guaranteed Loan
|
|
$
|
459,771
|
|
|
$
|
335,981
|
|
$609,733 EXIM Guaranteed Loan
|
|
|
90,463
|
|
|
|
262,400
|
|
Société Générale Term Loan
|
|
|
119,234
|
|
|
|
95,387
|
|
JBIC/SMBC Term Loan (Tranche B)
|
|
|
71,841
|
|
|
|
71,841
|
|
Fixed rate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.645% JBIC/SMBC Term Loan (Tranche A)
|
|
|
71,841
|
|
|
|
71,841
|
|
5.75% senior notes due 2010
|
|
|
373,546
|
|
|
|
374,215
|
|
6.00% amortizing bonds due 2010
|
|
|
20,351
|
|
|
|
10,476
|
|
6.25% senior notes due 2013
|
|
|
298,125
|
|
|
|
298,418
|
|
6.375% senior notes due 2015
|
|
|
247,397
|
|
|
|
247,641
|
|
Others
|
|
|
7,775
|
|
|
|
6,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt outstanding
|
|
$
|
1,760,344
|
|
|
$
|
1,774,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2006, 1,650 out of the originally issued 30,000 preference shares were
converted into ordinary shares. Assuming no further conversion or any redemption of the preference
shares until the maturity date on August 17, 2010, each remaining preference share is redeemable,
out of funds legally available for such payment, at a redemption price equal to $10,000 per
preference share, or a total of $283.5 million.
In January 2009 and July 2009, we made a repayment of $61.9 million each on the $653,131 EXIM
Guaranteed Loan.
In February 2009 and September 2009, we made the second and third drawdowns of $91.2 million and
$80.7 million, respectively, from the first tranche of the $609,733 EXIM Guaranteed Loan. As of
September 30, 2009, the remaining amount available for drawdown under this facility is $347.3
million.
In March 2009 and September 2009, we made a principal repayment of $11.9 million each on tranche A
of the $189,871 term loan facility from Société Générale, with Atradius as the export credit
insurer.
The EXIM Guaranteed Loans and the term loan facility from Société Générale require us to fund the
debt service reserve account if our historical debt service coverage ratio is less than 1.3 on any
repayment date. Similarly, the JBIC/SMBC Term Loan requires us to fund the debt service reserve
account with certain amounts specified under the facility agreement depending on whether our debt
service coverage ratio is less than 1.5 or 1.3 on any repayment date. Our historical debt service
coverage ratio with respect to the EXIM Guaranteed Loans and JBIC/SMBC Term Loan was less than 1.3
on the repayment date of July 15, 2009. Similarly, our historical debt service coverage ratio with
respect to the Société Générale term loan was less than 1.3 on the repayment date of September 1,
2009. We have funded the debt service reserve account with the required amount in respect of the
JBIC/SMBC Term Loan where the debt service coverage ratio was less than 1.5. For the remaining
amounts required to fund the respective debt service reserve accounts, the respective lenders have
waived the requirement to fund the respective debt service reserve accounts in August 2009.
Notwithstanding the waivers, we continue to have the ability to fund the debt service reserve
accounts.
On September 7, 2009, the respective boards of directors of Chartered and ATIC International
Investment Company LLC (the Acquiror) announced the proposed acquisition of Chartered by the
Acquiror by way of a scheme of arrangement under Section 210 of the Companies Act, Chapter 50 of
Singapore (the Scheme). The Acquiror is a special purpose vehicle incorporated in Abu Dhabi and
wholly-owned by Advanced Technology Investment Company LLC (ATIC). ATIC is a technology
investment company wholly-owned by the Government of Abu Dhabi. On October 9, 2009, Chartered
dispatched the scheme document to ordinary shareholders containing details of the Scheme (the
Scheme Document) together with related documentation.
As described in the Scheme Document, the Scheme requires the approval of Chartereds ordinary
shareholders at a meeting convened at the direction of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore.
In connection with the Scheme, Chartered has also given notice to convene an extraordinary general
meeting and a class meeting of holders of convertible redeemable preference shares in the capital
of Chartered to pass special resolutions relating to amendments of Chartereds Articles of
Association specified in the proxy statements for these meetings dispatched together with the
Scheme Document. These meetings are scheduled to be held on November 4, 2009. The Scheme will also
require the subsequent sanction of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore and satisfaction
(or, where applicable, waiver) of customary conditions, including regulatory conditions. Subject to
the satisfaction (or, where applicable, waiver) of the other conditions set out in the Scheme
Document, the Scheme is expected to become effective in December 2009.
35
Upon the Scheme becoming effective, Temasek will cease to, directly or indirectly, control us, own
at least 30% of our ordinary shares or be our single largest owner, in which case, the lenders of
the EXIM Guaranteed Loans, the term loan facility from Société Générale and the JBIC/SMBC Term Loan
either require or have the option to require us to prepay the debt. Chartered, together with ATIC, has obtained or is
seeking waivers from the Companys respective lenders of change of control clauses, to enable loan
facilities from these lenders to remain available to the Company following completion of the
Acquisition and of certain other covenants. The waivers are conditional on completion of the
Acquisition. Further, Chartereds facility agreements with the EXIM and Société Générale contain
certain restrictions against the amendment or modification of Chartereds Articles of Association.
Chartered, together with ATIC, are in discussions with EXIM and Société Générale to seek their
waivers from these restrictions to facilitate the amendments to Chartereds Articles of Association
contemplated in the special resolutions proposed to be voted on at the extraordinary general
meeting and the class meeting referred to above.
Similarly the revolving loan facilities with BOA and with SMBC, Citibank N.A., Singapore Branch and
Deutsche require Temasek to directly or indirectly, control us, own at least 30% of our ordinary
shares or be our single largest owner. As of the issuance date of these unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial statements, Chartered, together with ATIC, are still in discussions with
SMBC and BOA for the continuance of the respective revolving credit facilities.
In addition, holders of the 5.75% senior notes due 2010, 6.25% senior notes due 2013, 6.375% senior
notes due 2015 (collectively, Senior Notes), 6.00% amortizing bonds due 2010 (Amortizing Bonds)
and convertible redeemable preference shares (CRPS) have the option to require us to redeem the
Senior Notes, the Amortizing Bonds and the CRPS in the event that Temasek ceases to, directly or
indirectly, control the Company, own at least 30% of the ordinary shares of the Company or any
person acquires beneficial ownership of our voting securities that is greater than Temaseks
beneficial ownership of our voting securities. The Acquiror has represented to the Company that
resources are available to the Acquiror to allow it to satisfy its payment obligations under (among
others) the CRPS and to provide an amount in financing to the Company upon effectiveness of the
Scheme that should be sufficient to fund the repayment of the Senior Notes and the Amortizing
Bonds. The Acquiror has on October 12, 2009 made an offer to the holders of the CRPS to purchase
all the CRPS on terms and conditions set out in the Acquirors offer letter to CRPS holders.
We have an investment in a Fund, which is managed by an external financial institution. The Fund
consists primarily of corporate debt, mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities. Due
to the nature of the securities that the Fund invests in, the Funds underlying securities have
been exposed to adverse market conditions that have affected the value of the collateral and the
liquidity of the Fund. As a result, in December 2007, the investment manager of the Fund halted
demand redemptions and announced its intention to liquidate the Fund. The fair value of the Fund
is assessed by using market prices or, when such prices are not available, using a valuation
approach based on the current investment ratings, valuation parameters and estimates of the
underlying debt and securities, and redemptions of the Fund and the subsequent distribution of
cash. Based on this assessment, we determined that the fair value of the Fund and its underlying
debt and securities approximated the fair values provided by the investment manager of the Fund.
We received cash proceeds of $8.6 million and $16.2 million in further redemptions from the Fund
in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The net realized gain on the
redemptions for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $0.5 million and $0.6
million, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, the fair value of our pro-rata share of our
remaining investment in the Fund was $4.4 million. The investment manager of the Fund stated that
its expectation is to have a further 4.0% of our pro-rata share of the original investment in the
Fund liquidated by December 2009. If the credit and liquidity issues in the markets relating to
our investment and its underlying securities continue or worsen, we may recognize further losses
in the value of our remaining investment in the Fund.
Working capital, which is calculated as the excess of current assets over current liabilities, was
$471.6 million and $375.3 million as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009, respectively.
The decrease in working capital was due primarily to higher average outstanding debt balances due
for repayment within the next twelve months, partially offset by higher cash and cash equivalents
arising from the net proceeds from the rights offering completed in April 2009 as discussed below.
On March 9, 2009, we announced a rights offering of approximately 6,869,926,194 new Shares,
directly or in the form of ADSs.
Pursuant to the rights offering:
|
|
|
27 new Shares were offered for every 10 Shares held at S$0.07 per rights share; and
|
|
|
|
|
27 new ADSs were offered for every 10 ADSs held at a price of US$0.46 per rights ADS.
|
The rights offering was completed on April 15, 2009 and final net proceeds from the rights
offering were approximately $307 million.
Subsequent to the completion of the rights offering, we held a ten for one share consolidation
which was approved during an Extraordinary General Meeting of shareholders on April 30, 2009. The
share consolidation does not affect our financial statements other than to the extent it decreases
the number of outstanding shares and correspondingly increases per share information for all
periods presented. The purpose of the share consolidation is to help reduce certain fixed costs
and volatility in the trading of our shares on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited,
as well as to mitigate our risks of being delisted
36
from the Nasdaq Global Select Market on account
of the trading price of the ADSs falling below US$1.00 over a sustained period of time.
The crisis in the financial markets and the continuing challenging economic conditions globally
have adversely impacted many industries, including the semiconductor and foundry industries. In
addition, the volatility in the credit markets has resulted in uncertainty in the availability of
credit on reasonable terms. However, there have been encouraging signals from the global economy
and we are seeing incremental improvement in our business with an improvement in customers
orders. This is in line with the sequential growth for the semiconductor industry from March to
August 2009. We cannot predict the timing, strength or duration of any economic deterioration or
subsequent economic recovery, worldwide, or in the foundry industry. If improvements to the
current economic or market conditions are not sustained or increased, or if the current economic
or market conditions deteriorate again, our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected. Therefore there can be no assurance that
our business will generate and continue to generate sufficient cash flow to fund our liquidity
needs in the future as cash flow generation may be affected by, among other factors, sales levels,
capacity utilization, industry business conditions as well as global economic conditions.
In March 2009, Fitch Ratings revised our long-term foreign currency issuer default rating and
outstanding senior unsecured debt from BB+ to BB-. Moodys Global Credit Research also revised our
corporate and senior unsecured bond ratings down from Ba1 to Ba2 in March 2009, and from Ba2 to B1 in October 2009, but continues to
review the rating. In September 2009, Standard & Poors
Ratings Services lowered our long-term corporate credit rating and senior unsecured notes from BB
to BB-. The revisions in our ratings reflect expectations regarding our financial and competitive
conditions and we cannot assure you that we will not be subject to further credit rating
downgrades, particularly in view of the crisis in the financial markets and the deteriorating
global economy. Our debt agreements do not have triggers in respect of any credit rating
downgrades that would accelerate the maturity of our debt. However, subject to the achievement of
certain production milestones specified in our debt agreements, we may be required to commence
repayment of our debt earlier than the scheduled repayment dates set out in certain of our debt
agreements. These production milestones relate to the production capacity and shipment of a
certain number of wafers over a given time period as specified in the debt agreements. Credit
rating downgrades, depending on their severity, could affect our ability to access or renew
existing financing or to obtain additional financing as we may require from time to time depending
on the pace of our future growth and technology upgrades and migration. Credit rating downgrades
could also affect our ability to access the capital markets in the future on favorable terms, or
at all. As a result our ability to compete effectively in our business relative to competitors
with higher credit ratings could be affected. Furthermore, as a result of the current crisis in
the financial markets and deteriorating global economy, the cost and availability of credit has
been and may continue to be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit
spreads. Where additional financing could be obtained, there can be no assurance that such
additional financing will be available on terms satisfactory to us or that such additional
financing will not be dilutive to our shareholders or creditors.
Historic cash flows
The following table sets forth the summary of our cash flows for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
428,697
|
|
|
$
|
225,980
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
$
|
(632,515
|
)
|
|
$
|
(261,698
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
(77,619
|
)
|
|
$
|
315,996
|
|
37
Historic operating cash flows
Net cash provided by operating activities was $428.7 million and $226.0 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The $202.7 million decrease in cash flow
from operating activities was due primarily to lower sales, absence of refund of taxes arising
from the revocation of the pioneer status of Fab 3 of $73.8 million as occurred in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, lower interest income receipts due primarily to lower interest rates and
lower grant receipts. The decrease was partially offset by lower payments of operating expenses,
lower tax payments by $5.2 million and lower payments for joint-development fees.
Historic investing cash flows and capital expenditures
Net cash used in investing activities was $632.5 million and $261.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Investing activities consisted primarily of
capital expenditures totaling $443.6 million and $280.2 million in the nine months ended September
30, 2008 and 2009, respectively. Capital expenditure for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and 2009 were primarily for increasing the capacity for our 65nm and below process geometry
technologies. Investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 also included
$237.1 million related to the purchase of 100 percent of the shares in CST, which consisted of
cash and related direct costs of the acquisition, net of cash acquired of $6.5 million, funded
with existing cash balances. We also received cash proceeds of $55.8 million and $16.2 million in
further distributions from the Fund for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
In the second quarter of 2009, we have increased our capital expenditure guidance for 2009 from
approximately $375 million to approximately $500 million which will be primarily for increasing the
capacity of our 65nm and below technologies. We expect to fund this through a combination of
existing cash balances, cash flow from operations and the use of credit facilities. As of September
30, 2009, we had $574.3 million of unutilized banking facilities available for drawdown for
purposes of financing the purchases of equipment from certain vendors in accordance with designated
schedules set forth under the applicable facility agreements. Our credit facilities, however,
require us to maintain certain financial conditions and/ or ratios, including to meet certain debt
to equity leverage ratio covenants. Please refer to the discussion above on the availability and
requirements of the banking facilities in the event Temasek ceases to, directly or indirectly,
control the Company, own at least 30% of the ordinary shares of the Company or be the single
largest owner of the Company.
With the above capital expenditure, Fab 7 is expected to have equipment (installed or available
for installation) that is equivalent to a capacity of 31,000 twelve-inch wafers per month by March
2010. In September 2009, Fab 7 was equipped with a capacity of 27,000 twelve-inch wafers per
month. We expect Fab 7 to eventually have a total capacity of 45,000 twelve-inch wafers per month
covering 0.13um to 45nm technology nodes. The capacity plan will take several years to complete
and depends on market conditions, customer demand, adoption of next generation technologies and
our financial plans and capabilities. The total capital expenditure is expected to be
approximately between $4,200 million to $4,500 million for the planned capacity of 45,000
twelve-inch wafers per month. As of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009, we have spent an
accumulative total of $2,465.8 million and $2,697.1 million, respectively, on equipment for Fab 7.
As of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009, we had commitments on contracts for capital
expenditures of $298.9 million and $357.2 million, respectively. We may claim investment
allowances on future qualifying capital expenditures, subject to a minimum level of investment in
approved fixed capital expenditure within the qualifying period.
The nature of our industry is such that, in the short-term, we may reduce our capital expenditures
by delaying planned capital expenditures in response to a difficult business environment. However,
the semiconductor market is characterized by rapid technological change and the importance of
economies of scale, which we expect to result in significant capital expenditure requirements.
Historic financing cash flows
Net cash used in financing activities was $77.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $316.0 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. Financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
included a drawdown of $119.2 million from the Société Générale Term Loan facility, $113.1 million
from the JBIC/SMBC Term Loan and $60.0 million from BOA short-term credit facility. In addition,
we also drew down $10.6 million from the second tranche of the $653,131 EXIM Guaranteed Loan and
$90.5 million from the first tranche of the $609,733 EXIM Guaranteed Loan. We also made principal
repayments totaling $180.0 million and $150.0 million for the BOA short-term credit and the
revolving loan facilities, and the SMBC revolving loan facility, respectively, as well as loan
repayment of $94.3 million of the drawdown from the $653,131 EXIM Guaranteed Loan.
Financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 included the receipt of net
proceeds of $306.6 million from the completion of the rights offering in April 2009 and total
drawdown of $171.9 million from the first tranche of the $609,733 EXIM Guaranteed Loan. We also
made principal repayments totaling $123.8 million for the $653,131 EXIM Guaranteed Loan and $23.8
million on Tranche A of the $189,871 term loan facility from Société Générale.
38
The restricted cash relates to cash amounts reserved in a bank account and restricted for the
purpose of semi-annual principal and interest repayments related to certain loans. The decrease in
restricted cash of $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was due primarily to
lower future interest payments, partially offset by the amount funded in the debt service reserve
account in respect of the JBIC/SMBC Term Loan.
INVESTMENT IN SMP
Our investment in SMP as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009 is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cost (net of return of capital)
|
|
$
|
80,936
|
|
|
$
|
80,936
|
|
Share of retained post-formation gains
|
|
|
75,780
|
|
|
|
89,595
|
|
Dividends received
|
|
|
(135,397
|
)
|
|
|
(143,086
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,319
|
|
|
$
|
27,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in receivables and payables are amounts due from or to SMP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Amounts due from SMP
|
|
$
|
12,175
|
|
|
$
|
10,617
|
|
Amounts due to SMP
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
Summarized unaudited financial information for SMP is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
48,079
|
|
|
$
|
56,835
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
20,369
|
|
|
|
16,679
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(22,489
|
)
|
|
|
(23,154
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
46,118
|
|
|
$
|
50,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
38,862
|
|
|
$
|
35,979
|
|
|
$
|
123,176
|
|
|
$
|
85,274
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
9,566
|
|
|
$
|
9,363
|
|
|
$
|
30,852
|
|
|
$
|
14,660
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
8,732
|
|
|
$
|
8,858
|
|
|
$
|
28,217
|
|
|
$
|
11,746
|
|
39
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our exposure to financial market risks is derived primarily from the changes in interest rates and
foreign exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative financial instruments and
natural hedging by maintaining foreign currency bank deposits, the application of which is
intended for hedging purposes and not for speculative purposes.
Reference is made to Part I, Item 11, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk, in the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 and to
Note 13, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, Note 14, Fair Values of Financial
Instruments in the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in
this Form 6-K, for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Apart from changes in our exposure to
interest rate and foreign exchange risk which are presented in the tables below, there have been
no other material changes to our exposures to market risk as reported in these sections.
Interest rate risk
The tables below provide information about our long-term debt that are sensitive to changes in
interest rates. The table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest
rates by expected maturity dates. Weighted average floating rates are based on prevailing floating
interest rates related to the outstanding obligations as of September 30, 2009. There were no
outstanding interest rate contracts as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except interest rates)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate debt
(US$)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
173,877
|
|
|
$
|
214,485
|
|
|
$
|
149,630
|
|
|
$
|
120,162
|
|
|
$
|
107,456
|
|
|
$
|
765,610
|
|
|
$
|
765,610
|
|
Weighted average
interest rate
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
1.041
|
%
|
|
|
1.026
|
%
|
|
|
0.998
|
%
|
|
|
0.976
|
%
|
|
|
0.939
|
%
|
|
|
1.004
|
%
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt
(US$)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
385,476
|
|
|
$
|
14,368
|
|
|
$
|
14,368
|
|
|
$
|
314,368
|
|
|
$
|
278,737
|
|
|
$
|
1,007,317
|
|
|
$
|
985,368
|
|
Weighted average
interest rate
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
5.757
|
%
|
|
|
5.645
|
%
|
|
|
5.645
|
%
|
|
|
6.222
|
%
|
|
|
6.300
|
%
|
|
|
6.049
|
%
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
559,353
|
|
|
$
|
228,853
|
|
|
$
|
163,998
|
|
|
$
|
434,530
|
|
|
$
|
386,193
|
|
|
$
|
1,772,297
|
|
|
$
|
1,750,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate debt
|
|
$
|
741,309
|
|
|
$
|
741,309
|
|
Fixed rate debt
|
|
|
1,017,192
|
|
|
|
816,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,758,501
|
|
|
$
|
1,557,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
(1)
|
|
Average interest rates under Total are the weighted average interest rates of long-term
debt outstanding as of September 30, 2009.
|
As of September 30, 2009, 56.7% and 43.3% of our interest rate payment obligations on long-term
debt are at fixed rates and floating rates, respectively. We do not have cash flow and earnings
exposure due to market interest rate changes for our fixed rate debt obligations, however we do
have cash flow and earnings exposure due to market interest rate changes for our floating rate
debt obligations. Based on our interest payment obligations as of September 30, 2009, a 0.5%
increase in interest rates would increase our floating rate interest payments by 49.8% annually.
40
Foreign currency risk
The table below provides information about our foreign currency forward contracts and presents the
information in U.S. dollar equivalents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date of Notional Amounts
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except exchange rates)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Forward foreign
exchange agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Receive Yen/Pay US$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount
|
|
$
|
14,833
|
|
|
$
|
42,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,295
|
|
|
$
|
2,516
|
|
|
$
|
9,491
|
|
|
$
|
(65
|
)
|
Average
Contractual
Exchange Rate
|
|
93.7331/USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Receive S$/Pay US$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount
|
|
$
|
30,066
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,066
|
|
|
$
|
240
|
|
|
$
|
5,002
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
Average
Contractual
Exchange Rate
|
|
1.4191/USD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Receive Euro/Pay US$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount
|
|
$
|
17,330
|
|
|
$
|
20,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,843
|
|
|
$
|
1,271
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Average
Contractual
Exchange Rate
|
|
1.4145/Euro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contract Amount
|
|
$
|
62,229
|
|
|
$
|
62,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,204
|
|
|
$
|
4,027
|
|
|
$
|
14,493
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Not applicable.
41
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is not involved in any legal proceedings that we believe would be materially harmful
to the Company.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
None.
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: October 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHARTERED SEMICONDUCTOR
MANUFACTURING LTD.
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Chia Song Hwee
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Chia Song Hwee
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ George Thomas
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
George Thomas
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
43
Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd. (MM) (NASDAQ:CHRT)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Dez 2024 até Jan 2025
Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd. (MM) (NASDAQ:CHRT)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jan 2024 até Jan 2025