UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009
Commission File Number: 001-13735
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter.)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
36-3252484
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
501 W. North Ave.
Melrose Park, Illinois
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
60160
(Zip code)
|
(708) 865-1053
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at November 9, 2009
|
Common, par value $0.01
|
|
28,116,312
|
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
EX-31.1
|
EX-31.2
|
EX-32.1
|
i
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
32,278
|
|
|
$
|
61,330
|
|
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
|
|
|
295,162
|
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
327,440
|
|
|
|
63,065
|
|
Securities available-for-sale (securities pledged to creditors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$480,614 at September 30, 2009 and $482,224 at December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
621,949
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value: $30,387 at December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
652,216
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
31,698
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
2,454,101
|
|
|
|
2,509,759
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(83,506
|
)
|
|
|
(44,432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
2,370,595
|
|
|
|
2,465,327
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,675
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
40,589
|
|
|
|
38,313
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
20,980
|
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
14,683
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
49,505
|
|
|
|
129,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
3,570,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
330,901
|
|
|
$
|
334,495
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
2,224,288
|
|
|
|
2,078,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
2,555,189
|
|
|
|
2,412,791
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
777,078
|
|
|
|
817,041
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
31,624
|
|
|
|
34,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,363,891
|
|
|
|
3,264,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; Series
A, $2,500 liquidation preference, 17,250 shares issued and outstanding
at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008; Series T, $1,000
liquidation preference, 84,784 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 64,000,000 shares authorized;
29,847,092 shares issued and 28,116,312 outstanding at September 30,
2009 and 29,530,878 shares issued and 27,892,578 outstanding at
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
385,219
|
|
|
|
383,491
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(191,726
|
)
|
|
|
(66,325
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(4,032
|
)
|
|
|
(2,122
|
)
|
Treasury stock, at cost (1,730,780 shares at September 30, 2009 and
1,638,300 shares at December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
305,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
3,570,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
PAGE 1
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
33,294
|
|
|
$
|
37,364
|
|
|
$
|
103,191
|
|
|
$
|
115,562
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
7,739
|
|
|
|
13,091
|
|
|
|
25,776
|
|
Exempt from federal income taxes
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
Dividends from Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
35,135
|
|
|
|
45,888
|
|
|
|
118,063
|
|
|
|
143,927
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
11,385
|
|
|
|
15,301
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
50,501
|
|
Federal funds purchased and FRB discount window advances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
9,698
|
|
|
|
9,998
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
3,065
|
|
|
|
2,779
|
|
|
|
9,129
|
|
|
|
8,698
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
1,851
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
19,193
|
|
|
|
23,735
|
|
|
|
59,964
|
|
|
|
76,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
15,942
|
|
|
|
22,153
|
|
|
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
67,134
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
37,450
|
|
|
|
42,200
|
|
|
|
71,453
|
|
|
|
52,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(21,508
|
)
|
|
|
(20,047
|
)
|
|
|
(13,354
|
)
|
|
|
14,767
|
|
Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
1,918
|
|
|
|
5,860
|
|
|
|
5,834
|
|
Net gains (losses) on securities transactions
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
(16,652
|
)
|
|
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
(16,596
|
)
|
Impairment loss on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,801
|
)
|
|
|
(740
|
)
|
|
|
(65,387
|
)
|
Losses on sales of loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Insurance and brokerage commissions
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
Trust fees
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
911
|
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
Gain on sale of property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,196
|
|
Other
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income (loss)
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
|
|
(60,512
|
)
|
|
|
14,295
|
|
|
|
(54,328
|
)
|
Noninterest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
8,948
|
|
|
|
12,515
|
|
|
|
31,890
|
|
|
|
36,570
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
3,175
|
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
|
|
9,203
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
2,838
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
6,830
|
|
|
|
5,350
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,121
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
3,098
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
Merger related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
FDIC insurance
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
5,986
|
|
|
|
2,099
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
|
|
7,056
|
|
|
|
7,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
22,450
|
|
|
|
103,046
|
|
|
|
68,378
|
|
|
|
151,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(40,301
|
)
|
|
|
(183,605
|
)
|
|
|
(67,437
|
)
|
|
|
(191,232
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
(23,891
|
)
|
|
|
55,617
|
|
|
|
(28,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(41,267
|
)
|
|
|
(159,714
|
)
|
|
|
(123,054
|
)
|
|
|
(162,702
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends and premium accretion
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
2,506
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(42,556
|
)
|
|
$
|
(160,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(1.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(1.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
PAGE 2
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
300,762
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
102,762
|
|
|
$
|
(13,917
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
$
|
375,164
|
|
Cash dividends declared
($145.3125 per share) on Series
A preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,506
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.26
per share) on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,404
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock upon
exercise of 16,500 stock
options, net of tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Issuance of 226,324 shares
restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
Comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162,702
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162,702
|
)
|
Prior service cost, net of
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
Net increase in fair value
of securities classified as
available- for-sale, net of
income taxes and
reclassification adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160,478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
303,221
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(69,850
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,693
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
$
|
207,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
|
$
|
383,491
|
|
|
$
|
5,229
|
|
|
$
|
(66,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
$
|
305,834
|
|
Cash dividends declared
($48.4375 per share) on Series
A preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared ($9.72
per share) on Series T
preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
Issuance of 19,965 shares of
common stock to employee stock
purchase plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Issuance of 166,568 shares of
common stock to directors
deferred compensation plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Issuance of 334,882 shares of
restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accreted discount on Series T
preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
Repurchase of 10,695 shares of
common stock under benefit plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123,054
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123,054
|
)
|
Prior service cost including
income taxes adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
Income taxes adjustment on
decrease in value of
projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
Net decrease in fair value
of securities classified as
available- for-sale
including income taxes
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124,964
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
385,219
|
|
|
$
|
5,229
|
|
|
$
|
(191,726
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,032
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
$
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
PAGE 3
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(123,054
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162,702
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
3,096
|
|
|
|
3,107
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
69,700
|
|
|
|
51,765
|
|
Amortization of core deposit and other intangibles
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities, net
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
Realized (gain) loss on sale of securities, net
|
|
|
(4,637
|
)
|
|
|
16,596
|
|
Impairment loss on securities
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
65,387
|
|
Net loss on sales of loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Gain on sale of property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,196
|
)
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,121
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
(1,332
|
)
|
|
|
(2,634
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
48,706
|
|
|
|
(14,259
|
)
|
Loss on disposition of foreclosed properties, net
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Valuation loss on foreclosed properties
|
|
|
2,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred stock based compensation
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
Change in other assets
|
|
|
29,517
|
|
|
|
(16,774
|
)
|
Change in other liabilities
|
|
|
(2,471
|
)
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
25,433
|
|
|
|
15,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
573,741
|
|
|
|
108,770
|
|
Sales of securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
27,856
|
|
|
|
4,443
|
|
Redemption of Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
4,046
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Maturities of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
1,007,865
|
|
|
|
107,585
|
|
Principal payments on securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
49,537
|
|
|
|
42,496
|
|
Principal payments on securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
2,430
|
|
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(1,621,933
|
)
|
|
|
(244,043
|
)
|
Purchases of Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,535
|
)
|
Loan originations and principal collections, net
|
|
|
11,698
|
|
|
|
(68,969
|
)
|
Sale of mortgage loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,789
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,259
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of foreclosed properties
|
|
|
1,989
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Liquidation of bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
86,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(5,372
|
)
|
|
|
(2,694
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
137,903
|
|
|
|
(29,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
|
142,587
|
|
|
|
55,185
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234,600
|
|
Repayments on borrowings
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
|
|
(167,075
|
)
|
Preferred cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(1,660
|
)
|
|
|
(2,506
|
)
|
Common cash dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,076
|
)
|
Change in federal funds purchased, FRB discount window advances, and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66,750
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock under stock and incentive plan
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common under stock and incentive plan
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
101,039
|
|
|
|
42,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
264,375
|
|
|
|
28,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
63,065
|
|
|
|
84,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
327,440
|
|
|
$
|
113,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
61,237
|
|
|
$
|
78,685
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
PAGE 4
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the Company) included
herein are unaudited; however, such statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation
for the interim periods. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
The annualized results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year ending December 31, 2009. Certain
items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current years
presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income.
NOTE 2 FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT
The Companys credit agreements with a correspondent bank at September 30, 2009 included a
revolving line of credit and term note. The Company was in violation of the financial covenants
contained in the revolving line of credit and term note. The Company also did not make a required
principal payment on the term note due on July 1, 2009 and did not pay all of the aggregate
outstanding principal on the revolving line of credit that matured July 3, 2009. On July 8, 2009,
the lender advised the Company that the non-compliance and failure to make the principal payments
constitute events of default. See Note 15 Credit Agreements.
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement (Forbearance
Agreement) with its lender that provides for a forbearance
period through March 31, 2010, during which time the Company will continue to
pursue completion of its previously disclosed capital plan. Management believes that the
Forbearance Agreement provides the Company sufficient time to complete all major elements of the
capital plan; however there can be no assurance that any or all major elements of the capital plan
will be completed in a timely manner or at all. During the forbearance period, the Company is not
obligated to make interest and principal payments in excess of funds held in a deposit security
account (which will be funded with $325,000), and while retaining all rights and remedies
under the credit agreements, the lender has agreed not to demand payment of amounts due or begin
foreclosure proceedings in respect of the collateral, which consists
primarily of all the stock of the Companys principal
subsidiary, Midwest Bank and Trust Company, and has agreed to forbear from exercising the
rights and remedies available to it in respect of existing defaults and future compliance with
certain covenants through March 31, 2010. As part of the Forbearance Agreement, the Company entered
into a tax refund security agreement under which it agreed to deliver
to the lender the expected proceeds
to be received in connection with an outstanding Federal income tax refund in the approximate amount of
$2.1 million. These proceeds, when received, will be placed in the deposit security account, and
will be available for interest and principal payments. The Forbearance Agreement may terminate
prior to March 31, 2010 if the Company defaults under any of its representations, warranties or
obligations contained in either the Forbearance Agreement or credit agreements, or the Bank becomes
subject to receivership by the FDIC or the Company becomes subject to other bankruptcy or
insolvency type proceeding.
Upon the expiration of the forbearance period, the principal and interest payments that were
due under the revolving line of credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers, at
the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into will once again become due and payable, along
with such other amounts as may have become due during the forbearance period. Absent successful
completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would
not be able to meet any demands for payment of amounts then due at the expiration of the
forbearance period. If the Company is unable to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources
of financing on acceptable terms, it may have a material adverse effect on the Companys business
and results of operations.
PAGE 5
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 3 REGULATORY ACTIONS
The Banks primary regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Illinois Department
of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, have recently completed a safety and
soundness examination of the Bank. As a result of that examination, the Company expects that the
Federal Reserve Bank and the Division of Banking will request that the Bank enter into a formal
supervisory action requiring it to take certain steps intended to improve its overall condition.
Such a supervisory action could require the Bank, among other things,
to: implement the previously disclosed capital
plan to strengthen the Banks capital position; develop a plan to
improve the quality of the Banks loan portfolio by charging off loans and reducing its position in
assets classified as substandard; develop and implement a plan to enhance the Banks liquidity
position; and enhance the Banks loan underwriting and workout remediation teams. The final
supervisory action may contain other conditions and targeted time frames as specified by the
regulators.
The Company believes that the successful completion of all or a significant portion of the
Capital Plan will enable the Bank to meet the requirements of any formal supervisory action with
the regulators and will ensure that the Bank is able to comply with applicable bank regulations.
However, the successful completion of all or any portion of the capital plan is not assured and if
the Company or the Bank is unable to comply with the terms of the anticipated supervisory action or
any other applicable regulations, the Company and the Bank could become subject to additional,
heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our regulators were to take such additional actions,
the Company and the Bank could become subject to various requirements limiting the ability to
develop new business lines, mandating additional capital, and/or requiring the sale of certain
assets and liabilities. Failure of the Company to meet these conditions could lead to further
enforcement action on behalf of the regulators. The terms of any such additional regulatory
actions, orders or agreements could have a materially adverse effect on the business of the Bank
and the Company.
NOTE 4 NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has established the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification
TM
(Codification or ASC) as the single source of authoritative
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernmental entities (ASC 105). Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting
standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the
Codification will become non-authoritative. Following the Codification, the Board will not issue
new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force
Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (ASU), which will serve to update
the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for
conclusions on the changes to the Codification.
GAAP is not intended to be changed as a result of the FASBs Codification project, but it will
change the way the guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes will have a
significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their
accounting policies for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. The Company has implemented the Codification in this quarterly report by
providing references to the Codification topics.
PAGE 6
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In December 2007, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for business combinations (ASC
805), which modifies the accounting for business combinations and requires, with limited
exceptions, the acquirer in a business combination to recognize all of the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree at the acquisition-date, at
fair value. This guidance also requires certain contingent assets and liabilities acquired as well
as contingent consideration to be recognized at fair value. In addition, this guidance requires
payments to third parties for consulting, legal, audit, and similar services associated with an
acquisition to be recognized as expenses when incurred rather than capitalized as part of the cost
of the acquisition. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15,
2008 and early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2009 did not
have a material effect on the Companys results of operations or consolidated financial position.
In June 2008, the FASB provided guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial
instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entitys own stock (ASC 815-40-15). This guidance
applies to any freestanding financial instrument or embedded feature that has all of the
characteristics of a derivative or freestanding instrument that is potentially settled in an
entitys own stock (with the exception of share-based payment awards within the scope of the
authoritative guidance for stock compensation (ASC 718)). To meet the definition of indexed to own
stock, an instruments contingent exercise provisions must not be based on (a) an observable
market, other than the market for the issuers stock (if applicable), or (b) an observable index,
other than an index calculated or measured solely by reference to the issuers own operations, and
the variables that could affect the settlement amount must be inputs to the fair value of a
fixed-for-fixed forward or option on equity shares. This guidance is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of
this guidance on January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Companys results of
operations or consolidated financial position.
On June 16, 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for determining whether instruments
granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities (ASC 260). This guidance
addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating
securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in
computing earnings per share under the two-class method. This guidance is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. Accordingly, the Company adopted the provisions of this guidance effective
January 1, 2009 and computed earnings per share using the two-class method for all periods
presented. Upon adoption, the Company retrospectively adjusted earnings per share data to conform
to the provisions in this guidance.
In December 2008, the FASB amended the authoritative guidance regarding disclosures by public
entities about transfers of financial assets (ASC 860) and interests in variable interest entities
(ASC 810), which requires additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets and the
involvement with variable interest entities. These additional disclosures are intended to provide
greater transparency about a transferors continuing involvement with transferred assets and
variable interest entities. This guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2008. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations or consolidated financial position.
PAGE 7
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
On April 9, 2009, the FASB amended the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and
disclosures (ASC 820), which requires increased analysis and management judgment to estimate fair
value if an entity determines that either the volume and/or level of activity for an asset or
liability has significantly decreased or price quotations or observable inputs are not associated
with orderly transactions. Valuation techniques such as an income approach might be appropriate to
supplement or replace a market approach in those circumstances. This guidance requires entities to
disclose in interim and annual periods the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair
value along with any changes in valuation techniques and related inputs during the period. This
guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Accordingly, the
Company included these new disclosures beginning April 1, 2009. See Note 10 Fair Value for more
information.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB amended the authoritative guidance for interim disclosures about
fair value of financial instruments (ASC 825), which relates to fair value disclosures in public
entity financial statements for financial instruments. This guidance increases the frequency of
fair value disclosures from annual only to quarterly. This guidance is effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material
effect on the Companys results of operations or consolidated financial position, but enhanced
required disclosures. Accordingly, the Company included these new disclosures beginning April 1,
2009. See Note 10 Fair Value for more information.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued new authoritative guidance that revises the recognition and
reporting requirements for other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities (ASC 320). This
guidance eliminates the ability and intent to hold provision for debt securities and impairment
is considered to be other than temporary if a company (i) intends to sell the security, (ii) more
likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovering its cost, or (iii) does not
expect to recover the securitys entire amortized cost. This guidance also eliminates the
probability standard relating to the collectibility of cash flows and impairment is considered to
be other than temporary if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than
the amortized cost (credit loss). Other-than-temporary losses also need to be separated between the
amount related to credit loss (which is recognized in current earnings) and the amount related to
all other factors (which is recognized in other comprehensive income). This guidance is effective
for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on April
1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Companys results of operations or consolidated
financial position.
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance establishing principles and requirements
for subsequent events (ASC 855). This guidance establishes general standards of accounting for and
disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. This guidance is based on the same principles as those that
currently exist in the auditing standards. An entity must disclose the date through which
subsequent events have been evaluated and whether that date is the date the financial statements
were issued or available to be issued. This guidance also requires disclosure of subsequent events
to keep the financial statements from being misleading. This guidance is effective for interim or
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on June 30, 2009 did not
have a material effect on the Companys results of operations or consolidated financial position.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. This guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity, introduces the concept of a participating interest, which will limit the
circumstances where the transfer of a portion of a financial asset will qualify as a sale, assuming
all other derecognition criteria are met, it clarifies and amends the derecognition criteria for
determining whether a transfer qualifies for sale accounting, and requires additional disclosures.
The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 166 on January 1, 2010 will have a
material effect on the Companys results of operations or consolidated financial position. This
authoritative guidance has not yet been incorporated within the FASBs Codification.
PAGE 8
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),
which eliminates the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity. If an enterprise is required to consolidate an entity as
a result of the initial application of this standard, it should describe the transition method(s)
applied and shall disclose the amount and classification in its statement of financial position of
the consolidated assets or liabilities by the transition method(s) applied. If an enterprise is
required to deconsolidate an entity as a result of the initial application of this standard, it
should disclose the amount of any cumulative effect adjustment related to deconsolidation
separately from any cumulative effect adjustment related to consolidation of entities. The Company
does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 167 on January 1, 2010 will have a material effect
on the Companys results of operations or consolidated financial position. This authoritative
guidance has not yet been incorporated within the FASBs Codification.
NOTE 5 SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
451,785
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
451,792
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential (1)
|
|
|
147,043
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
147,003
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities residential (2)
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities (3)
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
14,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,115
|
)
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
618,551
|
|
|
$
|
1,809
|
|
|
$
|
(4,817
|
)
|
|
$
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA).
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes obligations of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes issues from Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and FHLMC.
|
PAGE 9
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury and U.S.
government-sponsored entities (1)
|
|
$
|
263,483
|
|
|
$
|
1,952
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
265,435
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
57,309
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
56,664
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities (1)(2)
|
|
|
281,592
|
|
|
|
3,363
|
|
|
|
(1,276
|
)
|
|
|
283,679
|
|
Equity securities (3)
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,819
|
)
|
|
|
930
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
19,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,935
|
)
|
|
|
15,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
624,309
|
|
|
$
|
5,556
|
|
|
$
|
(7,916
|
)
|
|
$
|
621,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
1,251
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,263
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities (1)(2)
|
|
|
29,016
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
29,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
30,267
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of the FHLMC and FNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company repositioned its securities portfolio to
lower capital requirements associated with higher risk-weighted assets, restructure expected cash
flows, reduce credit risk, and enhance the Banks asset sensitivity. The Company sold $538.1
million of its securities portfolio with an average yield of 3.94% and average life of slightly
over two years, including $27.7 million of securities classified as held-to-maturity. The
securities sold consisted of U.S. government-sponsored entities debentures, mortgage-backed
securities, and municipal bonds. These securities were sold in the open market at a net gain of
$4.3 million; $117,000 of this gain was related to securities classified as held-to-maturity. The
Company purchased $571.0 million of U.S. Treasury bills and Government National Mortgage
Association mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on these securities is 0.43% with an
average life of less than six months.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company still held $27.6 million in five securities, including
municipal bonds and U.S. government-sponsored entities mortgage-backed securities, that were
identified for sale under this portfolio repositioning program. Consistent with that program and
the Companys stated intent to sell these securities, the Company recognized a $740,000
other-than-temporary impairment charge on June 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, the
Company continued to hold two of the five securities with balances
totaling $2.0 million, which included a
municipal bond and a mortgage-backed security of a U.S. government-sponsored entity that were
identified for sale under this portfolio repositioning program, which were not impaired as of that
date.
PAGE 10
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary of the fair value of securities held-to-maturity and
available-for-sale with unrealized losses and an aging of those unrealized losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
49,997
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49,997
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential (1)
|
|
|
51,656
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,656
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
Equity securities of U.S.
government-sponsored entities (2)
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
(4,115
|
)
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
(4,115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
102,484
|
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
(4,115
|
)
|
|
|
113,348
|
|
|
|
(4,817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
102,484
|
|
|
$
|
(702
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,864
|
|
|
$
|
(4,115
|
)
|
|
$
|
113,348
|
|
|
$
|
(4,817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
34,293
|
|
|
$
|
(886
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,293
|
|
|
$
|
(886
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored entities(1)
|
|
|
60,117
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
39,778
|
|
|
|
(1,078
|
)
|
|
|
99,895
|
|
|
|
(1,276
|
)
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities (2)
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
(1,819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
(1,819
|
)
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
3,746
|
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
11,495
|
|
|
|
(3,648
|
)
|
|
|
15,241
|
|
|
|
(3,935
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
99,055
|
|
|
|
(3,190
|
)
|
|
|
51,273
|
|
|
|
(4,726
|
)
|
|
|
150,328
|
|
|
|
(7,916
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-sponsored entities(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,521
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
20,521
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,521
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
20,771
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
99,305
|
|
|
$
|
(3,190
|
)
|
|
$
|
71,794
|
|
|
$
|
(4,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
171,099
|
|
|
$
|
(7,946
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
The unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities is included in other comprehensive
loss on the consolidated balance sheets. Management has concluded that no individual unrealized
loss as of September 30, 2009, identified in the preceding table, represents other-than-temporary
impairment. The Company does not intend to sell nor would it be required to sell the securities
shown in the table with unrealized losses before recovering their amortized cost.
PAGE 11
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 6 LOANS
Major classifications of loans (source of repayment basis) are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
1,045,533
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,090,078
|
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
324,074
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
366,178
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
744,464
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
729,729
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
227,966
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
194,673
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
5,583
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
107,124
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
123,161
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross
|
|
|
2,454,744
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,510,151
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
$
|
2,454,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,509,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7 ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Following is a summary of activity in the allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance, at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
63,893
|
|
|
$
|
22,606
|
|
|
$
|
44,432
|
|
|
$
|
26,748
|
|
Provision charged to operations
|
|
|
36,700
|
|
|
|
41,950
|
|
|
|
69,700
|
|
|
|
51,765
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(17,723
|
)
|
|
|
(25,224
|
)
|
|
|
(32,268
|
)
|
|
|
(40,472
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
1,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off
|
|
|
(17,087
|
)
|
|
|
(25,128
|
)
|
|
|
(30,626
|
)
|
|
|
(39,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at end of period
|
|
$
|
83,506
|
|
|
$
|
39,428
|
|
|
$
|
83,506
|
|
|
$
|
39,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for credit losses reflected on the consolidated statements of operations
includes the provision for loan losses and the provision for unfunded commitment losses as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
$
|
36,700
|
|
|
$
|
41,950
|
|
|
$
|
69,700
|
|
|
$
|
51,765
|
|
Provision for unfunded commitment losses
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
$
|
37,450
|
|
|
$
|
42,200
|
|
|
$
|
71,453
|
|
|
$
|
52,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans. Information
with respect to impaired loans and the amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated thereto is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Impaired loans for which no allowance for loan losses is allocated
|
|
$
|
52,519
|
|
Impaired loans with an allocation of the allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
139,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
191,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses allocated to impaired loans
|
|
$
|
38,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
Average impaired loans
|
|
$
|
103,051
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis
|
|
|
443
|
|
PAGE 12
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 8 GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES
The following table presents the carrying amount and accumulated amortization of intangible
assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit and other intangibles
|
|
$
|
21,091
|
|
|
$
|
(8,127
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,964
|
|
|
$
|
21,091
|
|
|
$
|
(6,408
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,683
|
|
The amortization of intangible assets was $573,000 and $1.7 million for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. At September 30, 2009, the projected
amortization of intangible assets for the years ending December 31, 2009 through 2013 and
thereafter is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
2,292
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,918
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,752
|
|
The weighted average remaining amortization period for the core deposit intangibles is
approximately seven years as of September 30, 2009.
The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and other
intangibles during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
78,862
|
|
|
$
|
14,683
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
78,862
|
|
|
$
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consistent with established policy, an annual review for goodwill impairment as of
September 30, 2009 was conducted with the assistance of a nationally recognized third party
valuation specialist. Based upon that review, the Company determined that the $78.9 million
goodwill recorded on the September 30, 2009 balance sheet was not impaired.
PAGE 13
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 9 OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal
course of business to meet financing needs of customers. Since many commitments to extend credit
expire without being used, the amounts below do not necessarily represent future cash commitments.
These financial instruments include lines of credit, letters of credit, and commitments to extend
credit. These are summarized as follows as of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Lines of Credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
81,610
|
|
|
$
|
5,632
|
|
|
$
|
5,238
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,480
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
31,528
|
|
|
|
23,031
|
|
|
|
27,983
|
|
|
|
31,051
|
|
|
|
113,593
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
207,627
|
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
2,655
|
|
|
|
4,740
|
|
|
|
218,038
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
43,836
|
|
|
|
3,220
|
|
|
|
2,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,884
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
12,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commitments
|
|
$
|
377,523
|
|
|
$
|
34,899
|
|
|
$
|
38,704
|
|
|
$
|
37,777
|
|
|
$
|
488,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, commitments to extend credit included $12.9 million of fixed rate
loan commitments. These commitments are due to expire within 30 to 90 days of issuance and have
rates ranging from 6.25% to 7.25%. Substantially all of the unused lines of credit are at
adjustable rates of interest.
The Company had a reserve for losses on unfunded commitments of $2.1 million at September 30,
2009, up from $1.1 million at December 31, 2008 and $793,000 at September 30, 2008.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company began deferring payment of dividends on the
$84.8 million of Series T cumulative preferred stock and deferring interest payments on $60.8
million of its junior subordinated debentures as permitted by the terms of such debentures. The
deferred interest payments on the Companys junior subordinated debentures are accrued in the
period in which the payments would have been made which were $1.1 million through September 30,
2009.. The dividends on the Series T cumulative preferred stock are recorded only when declared.
The cumulative amount of dividends not declared was $2.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings. In the
opinion of management, any liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
PAGE 14
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 10 FAIR VALUE
The Company adopted the authoritative guidance for fair value measurement (ASC 820) on January
1, 2008. This guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset
or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for
the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants on the
measurement date. This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring
fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2:
Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3:
Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a companys own assumptions about
the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
|
The Companys available-for-sale investment securities are the only financial assets that are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis; it does not hold any financial liabilities that are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of available-for-sale securities are
determined by obtaining either quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or
matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used to value debt securities without
relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on these
securities relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. If quoted prices or matrix pricing
are not available, the fair value is determined by an adjusted price for similar securities
including unobservable inputs.
PAGE 15
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair values of the available-for-sale securities were measured at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 using the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices or
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets in
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Assets at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
451,792
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
451,792
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential (1)
|
|
|
147,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities residential (2)
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities
(3)
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,538
|
|
|
|
7,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
615,543
|
|
|
$
|
3,871
|
|
|
$
|
604,346
|
|
|
$
|
7,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and of U.S.
government-sponsored entities (4)
|
|
$
|
265,435
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
265,435
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
56,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities (1)(4)
|
|
|
283,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities
(3)
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
15,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,808
|
|
|
|
8,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
621,949
|
|
|
$
|
930
|
|
|
$
|
612,586
|
|
|
$
|
8,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes obligations of FHLMC.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes obligations of FHLMC and FNMA.
|
The following is a summary of changes in the fair value of other bonds that were measured
using significant unobservable inputs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
8,881
|
|
|
$
|
9,286
|
|
|
$
|
8,433
|
|
|
$
|
10,479
|
|
Paydowns received
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(1,483
|
)
|
|
|
(6,436
|
)
|
|
|
(940
|
)
|
|
|
(7,629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
7,326
|
|
|
$
|
2,850
|
|
|
$
|
7,326
|
|
|
$
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE 16
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Certain of the Companys impaired loans are measured using the fair value of the underlying
collateral on a non-recurring basis. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management
measures impairment in accordance with the authoritative guidance for loan impairments (ASC
310-10-35). At September 30, 2009, $139.1 million of the loans considered impaired were evaluated
based on the fair value of the collateral compared to $41.3 million at December 31, 2008. The fair
value of the collateral is determined by obtaining an observable market price or by obtaining an
appraised value with management applying selling and other discounts to the underlying collateral
value. If a current appraised value is not available, the fair value of the impaired loan is
determined by an adjusted appraised value including unobservable cash flows.
The fair values of the impaired loans based on the fair value of the collateral were measured
at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 using the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices or
|
|
Significant
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets in
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Assets at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
100,362
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,362
|
|
Assets at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
37,098
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,098
|
|
Loans which are measured for impairment using the fair value of collateral for collateral
dependent loans, had a gross carrying amount of $139.1 million, with an associated valuation
allowance of $38.8 million for a fair value of $100.4 million at September 30, 2009. At December
31, 2008, loans measured for impairment using the fair value of collateral had a carrying amount of
$41.3 million, with an associated valuation allowance of $4.2 million for a fair value of $37.1
million. The provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, included $48.7
million of specific allowance allocations for impaired loans.
The methods and assumptions used to determine fair values for each class of financial
instrument are presented below.
PAGE 17
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
327,440
|
|
|
$
|
327,440
|
|
|
$
|
63,065
|
|
|
$
|
63,065
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
621,949
|
|
|
|
621,949
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
|
|
30,387
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
31,698
|
|
|
|
31,698
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
2,370,595
|
|
|
|
2,283,820
|
|
|
|
2,465,327
|
|
|
|
2,485,011
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
9,506
|
|
|
|
9,506
|
|
|
|
13,302
|
|
|
|
13,302
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
|
330,901
|
|
|
|
330,901
|
|
|
|
334,495
|
|
|
|
334,495
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
2,224,288
|
|
|
|
2,238,968
|
|
|
|
2,078,296
|
|
|
|
2,008,100
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
8,357
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
334,776
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
369,376
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
371,126
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
|
|
410,992
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
26,510
|
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
|
|
56,572
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
9,904
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
53,007
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
7,128
|
|
|
|
7,128
|
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
The remaining other assets and liabilities of the Company are not considered financial
instruments and are not included in the above disclosures. The fair value adjustment of
off-balance-sheet items including loan commitments was not considered material due to their
short-term nature and variable rates of interest.
The methods and assumptions used to determine fair values for each class of financial
instrument are presented below.
A test for goodwill impairment was conducted as of September 30, 2009 with the assistance of a
nationally recognized third party valuation specialist. In Step 2 of that test, the Company
estimated the fair value of assets and liabilities in the same manner as if a purchase of the
reporting unit was taking place from a market participant perspective. Management worked closely
with the third party valuation specialist throughout the valuation process, provided necessary
information and reviewed and approved the methodologies, assumptions and conclusions.
The fair value estimation methodology selected for our most significant assets and liabilities
was based on our observations and knowledge of methodologies typically and currently utilized by
market participants, the structure and characteristics of the asset and liability in terms of cash
flows and collateral, and the availability and reliability of significant inputs required for a
selected methodology and comparative data to evaluate the outcomes.
PAGE 18
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The carrying amount is equivalent to the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents,
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, and accrued interest receivable and payable.
The fair values of securities are determined by obtaining either quoted prices on nationally
recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing. The Company selected the income approach for
performing loans, retail certificates of deposit and borrowings. The Company estimated discounted
fair values separately for nonaccrual loans and loans 60-89 days past due. The income approach
was deemed appropriate for the assets and liabilities noted above due to the limited current
comparable market transaction data available.
Net loans were $2.4 billion or 67% of Company assets as of September 30, 2009. The estimated
fair value of net loans was $86.8 million or 3.7% below book value. In computing this estimated
fair value, performing loans were broken into fixed and variable components, floors and collateral
coverage ratios were considered, and appropriate comparable market discount rates were used to
compute fair values using a discounted cash flow approach. A 40% discount was applied to
nonaccrual loans based upon recent Company charge-off experience and a 10% discount was applied to
loans 60-89 days past due.
There is no readily available market for a significant portion of the Companys financial
instruments. Accordingly, fair values are based on various factors relative to expected loss
experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics, and other factors. The assumptions
and estimates used in the fair value determination process are subjective in nature and involve
uncertainties and significant judgment and, therefore, fair values cannot be determined with
precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimated values. Further
discussion of material assumptions used in the fair value estimates and the effect of certain
changes in material assumptions on those values is included in Note 8 Goodwill and Intangibles.
PAGE 19
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 11 STOCK COMPENSATION AND RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
Under the Companys Stock and Incentive Plan (the Plan), officers, directors, and key
employees may be granted incentive stock options to purchase the Companys common stock at no less
than 100% of the market price on the date the option is granted. Options can be granted to become
exercisable immediately or after a specified vesting period or may be issued subject to performance
targets. In all cases, the options have a maximum term of ten years. The Plan also permits the
issuance of nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and restricted
stock units. The Plan authorizes a total of 3,900,000 shares for issuance. There are 1,636,778
shares remaining for issuance under the Plan at September 30, 2009. It is the Companys policy to
issue new shares of its common stock in conjunction with the exercise of stock options or grants of
restricted stock.
No employee stock options were exercised during the first nine months of 2009. Total employee
stock options outstanding at September 30, 2009 were 548,581 with exercise prices ranging between
$1.15 and $22.03, with a weighted average exercise price of $8.11, and expiration dates between
2010 and 2019. During the first nine months of 2009, 288,693 stock options were granted with an
exercise price of $1.15, which will vest over a three-year service period.
Information about option grants follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Grant- Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Value Per Share
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
379,371
|
|
|
$
|
14.28
|
|
|
$
|
4.80
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
288,693
|
|
|
|
1.15
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(119,483
|
)
|
|
|
10.88
|
|
|
|
3.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
548,581
|
|
|
|
8.11
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation expense for stock options previously granted was recorded in the
consolidated statement of operations based on the grants vesting schedule. Forfeitures of stock
option grants are estimated for those stock options where the requisite service is not expected to
be rendered. The grant-date fair value for each grant was calculated using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. The following table reflects the assumptions used to determine the grant-date fair
value stock options granted in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.78
|
%
|
Expected option life
|
|
7.5 years
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
52.54
|
%
|
Employee compensation expense related to stock options was $14,000 and $42,000 for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to $5,000 and $16,000 for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The total compensation cost
related to nonvested stock options not yet recognized was $132,000 at September 30, 2009 and the
weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be recognized is 28 months.
PAGE 20
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Under the Plan, officers, directors, and key employees may also be granted awards of
restricted shares of the Companys common stock. Holders of restricted shares are entitled to
receive non-forfeitable cash dividends paid to the Companys common stockholders and have the right
to vote the restricted shares prior to vesting. The existing restricted share grants vest over
various time periods not exceeding five years and some may be accelerated subject to achieving
certain performance targets. Compensation expense for the restricted shares equals the market price
of the related stock at the date of grant and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
expected vesting period. All restricted shares had a grant-date fair value equal to the market
price of the underlying common stock at date of grant.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized $156,000 and
$876,000 in compensation expense related to the restricted stock grants compared to $688,000 and
$2.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The total
compensation cost related to nonvested restricted shares not yet recognized was $1.4 million at
September 30, 2009 and the weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be
recognized is 32 months.
Information about restricted shares outstanding and activity follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
609,901
|
|
|
$
|
16.42
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
334,882
|
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(47,896
|
)
|
|
|
15.80
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(210,951
|
)
|
|
|
17.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
685,936
|
|
|
|
8.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
The Company and various members of senior management have entered into a Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan (SERP). The SERP is an unfunded plan that provides for guaranteed
payments, based on a percentage of the individuals final salary, for 15 years after age 65. The
benefit amount is reduced if the individual retires prior to age 65.
Effective April 1, 2008, the SERP agreements with employees constituted a pension plan under
the authoritative guidance for compensation retirement plans (ASC 715). The objective of this
guidance is to recognize the compensation cost of pension benefits (including prior service cost)
over that employees approximate service period. Included in salaries and benefits expense in the
statements of income was $319,000 and $956,000 of expense related to the SERP for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to $310,000 and $1.3 million, for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The expense related to the SERP for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 of $742,000 was calculated under the authoritative guidance
for deferred compensation arrangements (ASC 710). The prior service cost amortization expense was
$71,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The benefit obligation was $7.2 million and
$6.4 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
PAGE 21
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary of changes in the benefit obligation for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
6,403
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
618
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
267
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
7,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 13 INCOME TAXES
The difference between the provision for income taxes in the consolidated financial statements
and amounts computed by applying the current federal statutory income tax rate of 35% to income
before income taxes is reconciled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Income taxes computed at the statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(14,105
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(64,262
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(23,603
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(66,931
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Tax-exempt interest income on securities and loans
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
General business credits
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
due to state operating loss
|
|
|
(2,388
|
)
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
(2,137
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(2,607
|
)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
(2,898
|
)
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Life insurance cash surrender value increase, net of premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(922
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Liquidation of bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,924
|
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received deduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
17,397
|
|
|
|
(43.2
|
)
|
|
|
14,851
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
75,259
|
|
|
|
(111.7
|
)
|
|
|
14,851
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
Nondeductible costs and other, net
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(23,891
|
)
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
55,617
|
|
|
|
(82.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(28,530
|
)
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognizes interest related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties, if
any, in income tax expense.
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a tax expense of $966,000. This
expense relates primarily to the adjustment made to the net deferred tax asset as a result of the
reduced ability to use available tax planning strategies.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company liquidated its $85.8 million investment in
bank owned life insurance in order to reduce the Companys investment risk and the Banks
regulatory capital requirement. The $16.3 million increase in cash surrender value of the
policies since the time of purchase is treated as ordinary income for tax purposes. Additionally,
a 10% IRS excise tax was incurred as a result of the liquidation. As a result, the Company
recorded federal tax expense of $6.9 million and an additional state tax expense of $1.2 million
in the second quarter of 2009 for this transaction.
PAGE 22
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company increased the total valuation allowance by $16.9 million to $76.9 million against
its existing net deferred tax assets during the quarter. The valuation allowance includes $1.6
million recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss fully offsetting deferred taxes which
were established for securities available for sale and for the SERP program. The Companys
primary deferred tax assets relate to its allowance for loan losses, net operating losses
(NOLs) and impairment charges relating to FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock holdings. Under
generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation allowance is required to be recognized if it
is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized. In making that
determination, management is required to evaluate both positive and negative evidence including
recent historical financial performance, forecasts of future income, tax planning strategies and
assessments of the current and future economic and business conditions. The Company performs and
updates this evaluation on a quarterly basis.
In conducting its regular quarterly evaluation, the Company made a determination to maintain
the valuation allowance as of September 30, 2009 based primarily upon the existence of a three
year cumulative loss derived by combining the pre-tax income (loss) reported during the two most
recent annual periods (calendar years ended 2007 and 2008) with managements current projected
results for the year ending 2009. This three year cumulative loss position is primarily
attributable to significant provisions for loan losses incurred and currently forecasted during
the three years ending 2009 and losses realized during 2008 on its FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock
holdings. The Companys current financial forecasts indicate that taxable income will be
generated in the future. However, the existing deferred tax benefits may not be fully realized
due to statutory limitations on their utilization based on the Companys planned capital
restructuring. The creation and subsequent addition to the valuation allowance, although it
increased tax expense for the second and third quarters and similarly reduced tangible book
values, did not have an effect on the Companys cash flows. The remaining net deferred tax assets
of $4.1 million are supported by available tax planning strategies.
An Illinois Department of Revenue audit has commenced for the Company for the years 2006 and
2007. The Company has also been notified that Royal American Corporation will be audited by the
IRS for the carryback of its separate company loss for 2006 to 2004. The Company is responsible
for all taxes related to Royal American including periods prior to its acquisition. The Company
does not anticipate any adjustments as a result of these audits that would result in significant
change to its financial position. It is reasonably possible that the gross balance of
unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next twelve months.
Years that remain subject to examination include 2006 to present for federal, 2005 to present
for Illinois, 2005 to present for Indiana, and 2005 to present for federal and Illinois for
various acquired entities.
PAGE 23
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 14 EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(41,267
|
)
|
|
$
|
(159,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
(123,054
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162,702
|
)
|
Less: Series A preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
2,506
|
|
Series T preferred stock dividends (1)
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series T preferred stock discount accretion
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(42,556
|
)
|
|
$
|
(160,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
27,953
|
|
|
|
27,859
|
|
|
|
27,936
|
|
|
|
27,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(1.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
27,953
|
|
|
|
27,859
|
|
|
|
27,936
|
|
|
|
27,851
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of restricted stock (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average common shares
|
|
|
27,953
|
|
|
|
27,859
|
|
|
|
27,936
|
|
|
|
27,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(1.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes $824 in dividends declared in first quarter of 2009 and $1,060 and $2,661 in
cumulative dividends not declared for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
|
No adjustment for unvested restricted shares was included in the computation of loss
available to common stockholders for any period there was a loss. See
Note 4 New Accounting
Pronouncements.
|
|
(3)
|
|
No shares of stock options or restricted stock were included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share for any period there was a loss.
|
Options to purchase 548,581 shares at $8.11 were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 421,322
shares at $14.10 were not included for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 because
the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock and the
options were, therefore, anti-dilutive. The warrant to purchase 4,282,020 shares at an exercise
price of $2.97 was not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the
warrants exercise price was greater than the average market price of common stock and was,
therefore, anti-dilutive. A total of 685,936 shares of restricted stock for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 615,637 shares of restricted stock for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 were not included in the computation of diluted shares because of
the anti-dilutive effect. The shares that would be issued if the Series A noncumulative redeemable
convertible perpetual preferred stock were converted are not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 because of their
anti-dilutive effect.
PAGE 24
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 15 CREDIT AGREEMENTS
The Companys credit agreements with a correspondent bank at September 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008 consisted of a revolving line of credit, a term note, and a subordinated debenture in the
amounts of $8.6 million, $55.0 million, and $15.0 million, respectively.
The revolving line of credit had a maximum availability of $8.6 million, an outstanding
balance of $8.6 million as of September 30, 2009, an interest rate at September 30, 2009 of
one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis points with an interest rate floor of 7.25%, and matured on July 3,
2009. The term note had an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis points at September 30,
2009 and matures on September 28, 2010. The subordinated debt had an interest rate of one-month
LIBOR plus 350 basis points at September 30, 2009, matures on March 31, 2018, and qualifies as Tier
2 capital.
The revolving line of credit and term note included the following financial covenants at
September 30, 2009: (1) Midwest Bank and Trust Company (the Bank) must not have nonperforming
loans (loans on nonaccrual status and 90 days or more past due and troubled-debt restructured
loans) in excess of 3.00% of total loans, (2) the Bank must report a quarterly profit, excluding
charges related to acquisitions, and (3) the Bank must remain well capitalized. At September 30,
2009, the Company was in violation of financial convenants (the Financial Covenant
Defaults).
The Company did not make a required $5.0 million principal payment on the term note due on
July 1, 2009 under the covenant waiver for the third quarter of 2008. On July 8, 2009, the lender
advised the Company that such non-compliance constitutes a continuing event of default under the
loan agreements (the Contingent Waiver Default). The Companys decision not to make the $5.0
million principal payment, together with its previously announced decision to suspend the dividend
on its Series A preferred stock and defer the dividends on its Series T preferred stock and
interest payments on its trust preferred securities, were made in order to retain cash and preserve
liquidity and capital at the holding company.
The revolving line of credit matured on July 3, 2009, and the Company did not pay to the
lender all of the aggregate outstanding principal on the revolving line of credit on such date. The
failure to make such payment constitutes an additional event of default under the credit agreements
(the Payment Default; the Contingent Wavier Default, the Financial Covenant Defaults and the
Payment Default are hereinafter collectively referred to as the Existing Events of Default).
As a result of the occurrence and the continuance of the Existing Events of Default, the
lender notified the Company that, as of July 8, 2009, the interest rate on the revolving line of
credit increased to the then current default interest rate of 7.25%,
which represents the current interest rate floor, and the interest rate under
the term loan agreement increased to the default interest rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 455 basis
points. The Company also did not make a required $5.0 million principal payment on the term note
due on October 1, 2009 under the covenant waiver for the third quarter of 2008.
PAGE 25
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As a result, and as a result of the other Existing Events of Default, the lender possesses
certain rights and remedies, including the ability to demand immediate payment of amounts due
totaling $63.6 million plus accrued interest or foreclose on the collateral supporting the credit
agreements, being 100% of the stock of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank.
On
October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance
agreement with its lender that provides for a forbearance period
through March 31, 2010. See Note 2 Forbearance Agreement.
NOTE 16 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has performed an evaluation of events that have occurred subsequent to September
30, 2009 and through November 9, 2009 (the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q). There have been
no subsequent events that occurred during such period that would require disclosure in this Form
10-Q, other than those that are described in Note 2 Forbearance Agreement, Note 3 Regulatory
Actions, and Note 15 Credit Agreements, or would be required to be recognized in the
Consolidated Financial Statements as of or for the three- and nine- month periods ending September
30, 2009.
PAGE 26
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis is intended as a review of significant factors affecting
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods indicated. The
discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and
the Notes thereto presented herein. In addition to historical information, the following
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Companys actual results
could differ significantly from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result
of certain factors discussed in this report.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. By their nature, changes in these assumptions and estimates
could significantly affect the Companys financial position or results of operations. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. Those critical accounting policies that are of
particular significance to the Company are discussed in the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (File No. 333-160985) filed with the SEC on October 26, 2009 under the caption
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates.
Recent Developments
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement (Forbearance
Agreement) with its lender that provides for a forbearance period through March 31, 2010, during
which time the Company will continue to pursue completion of its previously disclosed capital plan.
Management believes that the Forbearance Agreement provides the Company sufficient time to complete
all major elements of the capital plan; however there can be no assurance that any or all major
elements of the capital plan will be completed in a timely manner or at all. During the forbearance
period, the Company is not obligated to make interest and principal payments in excess of funds
held in a deposit security account (which will be funded with $325,000), and while retaining all
rights and remedies under the credit agreements, the lender has agreed not to demand payment of
amounts due or begin foreclosure proceedings in respect of the collateral, which consists primarily
of all the stock of the Companys principal subsidiary, Midwest Bank and Trust Company, and has
agreed to forbear from exercising the rights and remedies available to it in respect of existing
defaults and future compliance with certain covenants through March 31, 2010. As part of the
Forbearance Agreement, the Company entered into a tax refund security agreement under which it
agreed to deliver to the lender the expected proceeds to be received in connection with an
outstanding Federal income tax refund in the approximate amount of $2.1 million. These proceeds,
when received, will be placed in the deposit security account, and will be available for interest
and principal payments. The Forbearance Agreement may terminate prior to March 31, 2010 if the
Company defaults under any of its representations, warranties or obligations contained in either
the Forbearance Agreement or credit agreements, or the Bank becomes subject to receivership by the
FDIC or the Company becomes subject to other bankruptcy or insolvency type proceeding.
Upon the expiration of the forbearance period, the principal and interest payments that were
due under the revolving line of credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers, at
the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into will once again become due and payable, along
with such other amounts as may have become due during the forbearance period. Absent successful
completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would
not be able to meet any demands for payment of amounts then due at the expiration of the
forbearance period. If the Company is unable to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources
of financing on acceptable terms, it may have a material adverse effect on the Companys business
and results of operations.
The Banks primary regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Illinois Department
of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, have recently completed a safety and
soundness examination of the Bank. As a result of that examination, the Company expects that the
Federal Reserve Bank and the Division of Banking will request that the Bank enter into a formal
supervisory action requiring it to take certain steps intended to improve its overall condition.
Such a supervisory action could require the Bank,
PAGE 27
among other things, to: implement the capital restoration plan described below to strengthen
the Banks capital position; develop a plan to improve the quality of the Banks loan portfolio by
charging off loans and reducing its position in assets classified as substandard; develop and
implement a plan to enhance the Banks liquidity position; and enhance the Banks loan underwriting
and workout remediation teams. The final supervisory action may contain other conditions and
targeted time frames as specified by the regulators.
The Company believes that the successful completion of all or a significant portion of the
Capital Plan will enable the Bank to meet the requirements of any formal supervisory action with
the regulators and will ensure that the Bank is able to comply with applicable bank regulations.
However, the successful completion of all or any portion of the capital plan is not assured and if
the Company or the Bank is unable to comply with the terms of the anticipated supervisory action or
any other applicable regulations, the Company and the Bank could become subject to additional,
heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our regulators were to take such additional actions,
the Company and the Bank could become subject to various requirements limiting the ability to
develop new business lines, mandating additional capital, and/or requiring the sale of certain
assets and liabilities. Failure of the Company to meet these conditions could lead to further
enforcement action on behalf of the regulators. The terms of any such additional regulatory
actions, orders or agreements could have a materially adverse effect on the business of the Bank
and the Company.
Brogan Ptacin and Kelly J. OKeeffe, each an Executive Vice President of the Bank, resigned
from the Bank effective August 14, 2009. Messrs. Ptacin and OKeeffes responsibilities were
assigned to other members of management.
On July 28, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Bank and the Company accepted the
resignation of three directors, reducing the Boards from eleven to eight members. On September 21,
2009, the Company announced the death of Director Thomas A. Rosenquist. The boards of the Company
and the Bank now have seven members.
On July 28, 2009, the Company announced that it had developed a detailed capital plan and
timeline for execution (the Capital Plan). The Capital Plan was adopted in order to, among other
things, improve the Companys common equity capital and raise additional capital to enable it to
better withstand and respond to adverse market conditions. Management has completed, or is in the
process of completing, a number of steps as part of the Capital Plan, including:
|
|
Cost reduction initiatives which will eliminate $14.6 million in expenses on an annualized
basis when compared to either our 2008 expenses excluding the goodwill impairment and loss on
extinguishment of debt or our 2nd quarter 2009 expenses similarly excluding the FDIC special
assessment and severance expenses. This will be accomplished through a reduction in force of
over 100 employees, which was completed by September 30, 2009, salary reductions for employees
led by the Companys top executives salaries of 7% to 10%, suspension of certain benefits,
elimination of discretionary projects and initiatives and an increased focus on expense
control;
|
|
|
Retained independent consultants to refine credit loss projections through 2010;
|
|
|
Broadened investment banking support to assist with the capital plan;
|
|
|
Undertaking an offer to holders of the Companys outstanding Depositary Shares, each
representing 1/100th fractional interest in a share of the Companys Series A noncumulative
redeemable convertible perpetual preferred stock, to exchange their Depositary Shares for
shares of the Companys common stock (the Exchange Offer). On October 26, 2009, the
Company amended its registration statement previously filed with the SEC in connection with
the proposed Exchange Offer;
|
|
|
Possible capital raising activities;
|
PAGE 28
|
|
Continued negotiations with the companys primary lender to restructure $55.0 million
senior debt
and $15.0 million subordinated debt;
|
|
|
Analyzed the ability to exchange $59.0 million of trust preferred securities into equity.
We have been advised an exchange for equity cannot be facilitated for the collateral in a
trust preferred pooled securitization as a consequence of the tax status of the trust
prohibiting the ownership of an equity security; and
|
|
|
Filed an initial application seeking an investment by the U.S. Treasury of up to
approximately $137.9 million (based on June 30, 2009 risk weighted assets) pursuant to its
Capital Assistance Program (CAP) that would be used to redeem the $84.8 million outstanding
preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury under its Capital Purchase Program (CPP) in
2008. The Company would seek to convert the CAP preferred stock to common stock following
issuance of the CAP preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury (subject to regulatory approval). A
condition precedent to the redemption of the $84.8 million outstanding preferred stock issued
under the CPP is the payment of the deferred dividends, which were $2.7 million thorugh
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
The Company is in negotiations with the U.S. Treasury related to conversion of the $84.8
million outstanding preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury under its Capital Purchase
Program in 2008, to common stock. Subsequent to filing its intitial
application, the Company amended its application
to reduce the amount of the requested investment to $84.8 million.
|
The Company believes the successful completion of its Capital Plan would substantially improve
its capital position; however, no assurances can be made that the Company will be able to
successfully complete all, or any portion of its Capital Plan, or that the Capital Plan will not be
materially modified in the future. The Companys decision to implement its Capital Plan reflects
the adverse effect that the severe downturn in the commercial and residential real estate markets
has had on the Companys financial condition and capital base, as well as its assessment of current
regulatory expectations of adequate levels of common equity capital. If the Company is not able to
successfully complete a substantial portion of its Capital Plan, the Company expects that its
business, and the value of its securities, will be materially and adversely affected, and it will
be more difficult for the Company to meet the capital requirements expected of it by its primary
banking regulators.
On May 6, 2009, the Company announced that Roberto R. Herencia was named president and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank, replacing J. J. Fritz, who became senior executive
vice president of Midwest Banc Holdings. Mr. Herencia, who also was appointed to the board of
directors of the Company, was formerly president and director of Banco Popular North America based
in Chicago and executive vice president of Popular, Inc., the parent company. Under Mr. Herencias
direction, the Company immediately tightened its loan underwriting and pricing criteria, began
aggressive balance sheet repositioning activities, and developed a comprehensive capital plan, as
discussed above. These activities are designed to right-size the Company, preserve capital and
reduce the risk inherent in the balance sheet. As a result of these activities, the Company
reported asset reductions for the second and third quarters of 2009 and reductions in risk-weighted
assets as defined for regulatory capital purposes.
The Company announced on May 6, 2009, that the Board of Directors made the decision to suspend
the dividend on the $43.1 million of Series A noncumulative redeemable convertible perpetual
preferred stock; defer the dividend on the $84.8 million of Series T preferred stock; and defer
interest payments on $60.8 million of its junior subordinated debentures as permitted by the terms
of such debentures. The Company has no current plans to resume dividend payments in respect of the
Series A preferred stock or the Series T preferred stock or interest payments in respect of its
junior subordinated debentures.
PAGE 29
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The following table sets forth certain selected consolidated financial data at or for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
At or For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Statement of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
35,135
|
|
|
$
|
45,888
|
|
|
$
|
40,662
|
|
|
$
|
118,063
|
|
|
$
|
143,927
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
19,193
|
|
|
|
23,735
|
|
|
|
19,607
|
|
|
|
59,964
|
|
|
|
76,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
15,942
|
|
|
|
22,153
|
|
|
|
21,055
|
|
|
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
67,134
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
37,450
|
|
|
|
42,200
|
|
|
|
20,750
|
|
|
|
71,453
|
|
|
|
52,367
|
|
Noninterest income(loss)
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
|
|
(60,512
|
)
|
|
|
7,295
|
|
|
|
14,295
|
|
|
|
(54,328
|
)
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
22,450
|
|
|
|
103,046
|
|
|
|
24,420
|
|
|
|
68,378
|
|
|
|
151,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(40,301
|
)
|
|
|
(183,605
|
)
|
|
|
(16,820
|
)
|
|
|
(67,437
|
)
|
|
|
(191,232
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
(23,891
|
)
|
|
|
59,647
|
|
|
|
55,617
|
|
|
|
(28,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(41,267
|
)
|
|
|
(159,714
|
)
|
|
|
(76,467
|
)
|
|
|
(123,054
|
)
|
|
|
(162,702
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends and premium accretion
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
2,506
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities (9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(42,556
|
)
|
|
$
|
(160,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(77,757
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share (basic)
|
|
$
|
(1.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.78
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.93
|
)
|
Earnings per share (diluted)
|
|
|
(1.52
|
)
|
|
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
|
(2.78
|
)
|
|
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
|
(5.93
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
Book value at end of period
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
|
|
5.89
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
|
|
5.89
|
|
Tangible book value at end of period (non-GAAP measure) (9)
|
|
|
(1.25
|
)
|
|
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
(1.25
|
)
|
|
|
2.51
|
|
Selected Financial Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets (1)
|
|
|
(4.49
|
)%
|
|
|
(17.25
|
)%
|
|
|
(8.38
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.50
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.90
|
)%
|
Return on average equity (2)
|
|
|
(78.30
|
)
|
|
|
(181.60
|
)
|
|
|
(103.60
|
)
|
|
|
(61.15
|
)
|
|
|
(58.64
|
)
|
Dividend payout ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Average equity to average assets
|
|
|
5.73
|
|
|
|
9.50
|
|
|
|
8.09
|
|
|
|
7.36
|
|
|
|
10.06
|
|
Tier 1 common capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
(1.24
|
)
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
(1.24
|
)
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
6.26
|
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
6.26
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
8.04
|
|
|
|
9.03
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
8.04
|
|
Net interest margin (tax equivalent) (3)(4)
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
|
Loan to deposit ratio
|
|
|
96.04
|
|
|
|
99.25
|
|
|
|
100.82
|
|
|
|
96.04
|
|
|
|
99.25
|
|
Net overhead expense to average assets (5)
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
10.73
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
|
|
4.52
|
|
Efficiency ratio (6)
|
|
|
97.74
|
|
|
|
386.61
|
|
|
|
97.21
|
|
|
|
91.63
|
|
|
|
154.70
|
|
Loan Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
Provision for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
5.93
|
|
|
|
6.69
|
|
|
|
3.13
|
|
|
|
3.80
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
Net loans charged off to average total loans
|
|
|
2.71
|
|
|
|
3.98
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to total loans
|
|
|
7.90
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
3.71
|
|
|
|
7.90
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets (7)
|
|
|
6.06
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
|
|
6.06
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
0.43
|
x
|
|
|
0.65
|
x
|
|
|
0.67
|
x
|
|
|
0.43
|
x
|
|
|
0.65
|
x
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
3,583,377
|
|
|
$
|
3,569,199
|
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
3,583,377
|
|
Total earning assets
|
|
|
3,392,458
|
|
|
|
3,176,629
|
|
|
|
3,344,103
|
|
|
|
3,392,458
|
|
|
|
3,176,629
|
|
Average assets
|
|
|
3,650,053
|
|
|
|
3,682,449
|
|
|
|
3,660,670
|
|
|
|
3,653,203
|
|
|
|
3,685,013
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
2,454,101
|
|
|
|
2,494,225
|
|
|
|
2,559,257
|
|
|
|
2,454,101
|
|
|
|
2,494,225
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
83,506
|
|
|
|
39,428
|
|
|
|
63,893
|
|
|
|
83,506
|
|
|
|
39,428
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
2,555,189
|
|
|
|
2,513,004
|
|
|
|
2,538,490
|
|
|
|
2,555,189
|
|
|
|
2,513,004
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
777,078
|
|
|
|
829,024
|
|
|
|
777,074
|
|
|
|
777,078
|
|
|
|
829,024
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
207,237
|
|
|
|
219,671
|
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
207,237
|
|
Tangible stockholders equity (non-GAAP measure) (8)
|
|
|
88,413
|
|
|
|
113,101
|
|
|
|
127,272
|
|
|
|
88,413
|
|
|
|
113,101
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Net income divided by average assets.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Net income divided by average equity.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Net interest income, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, divided by average earning assets.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The following table reconciles reported net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
15,942
|
|
|
$
|
22,153
|
|
|
$
|
21,055
|
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
$
|
67,134
|
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment to net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, fully tax-equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
15,942
|
|
|
$
|
22,610
|
|
|
$
|
21,055
|
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
$
|
69,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
tax-equivalent adjustment is included for the 2009 periods as a
result of the Companys current tax position.
PAGE 30
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Noninterest expense less noninterest income, excluding security gains or losses, divided by average assets.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Noninterest expense excluding amortization and foreclosed properties expense divided by noninterest
income, excluding security gains or losses, plus net interest income
on a fully tax-equivalent basis.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes total nonaccrual, troubled-debt restructured loans, and foreclosed properties.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Stockholders equity less goodwill, core deposits and other intangible assets. Management believes that
tangible stockholders equity (non-GAAP measure) is a more useful measure since it excludes the balances
of intangible assets reflecting the Companys underlying worth. The following table reconciles reported
stockholders equity to tangible stockholders equity for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30,
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
180,239
|
|
|
$
|
207,237
|
|
|
$
|
219,671
|
|
Core deposit intangible and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
15,274
|
|
|
|
13,537
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
88,413
|
|
|
$
|
113,101
|
|
|
$
|
127,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
Prior periods with earnings were re-stated as required by the authoritative guidance for determining whether instruments granted in
share-based payment transactions are participating securities (ASC 260-10-55), which was effective on January 1, 2009, to allocate
earnings available to common stockholders to restricted shares of common stock that are considered participating securities.
|
|
(10)
|
|
The provision for credit losses includes the provision for loan losses and the provision for unfunded commitments losses as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
$
|
36,700
|
|
|
$
|
41,950
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
69,700
|
|
|
$
|
51,765
|
|
Provision for unfunded commitments losses
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
$
|
37,450
|
|
|
$
|
42,200
|
|
|
$
|
20,750
|
|
|
$
|
71,453
|
|
|
$
|
52,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations Three and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 and Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Set forth below are highlights of the third quarter of 2009 results compared to the third
quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2009.
Basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $1.52
compared to $5.76 for the comparable period in 2008 and $2.78 for the second quarter of 2009. Net
loss for the third quarter of 2009 was $41.3 million compared to $76.5 million loss in the second
quarter of 2009 and loss of $159.7 million for the third quarter of 2008. The results of the
second quarter of 2009 included a $57.9 million tax charge due to a valuation allowance on deferred
tax assets and an $8.1 million tax charge related to the liquidation of bank owned life insurance
which was partly offset by the $4.3 million in net gains on the securities portfolio repositioning.
The annualized return on average assets for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was
(4.49)% compared to (17.25)% for the similar period in 2008 and (8.38)% for the second quarter of
2009. The annualized return on average equity for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was
(78.30)% compared to (181.60)% for the similar period in 2008 and (103.60)% for the second quarter
of 2009.
Net interest income decreased 28.0% to $15.9 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to
$22.2 million in the third quarter of 2008 and was 24.3% lower than the second quarter of 2009.
Similarly, the net interest margin decreased to 1.83% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to
2.52% in the second quarter of 2009 and 2.77% in the third quarter of 2008, as a result of
repositioning the securities portfolio into shorter term lower yielding securities in the second
quarter of 2009, the net reversals of interest income related to the increase in nonaccrual loans,
the decrease in loan balances, and the increase in low-yielding interest-bearing deposits due from
banks.
PAGE 31
The provision for credit losses was $37.5 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to
$42.2 million for the comparable period in 2008 and $20.8 million in the second quarter of 2009.
The increase in provision for credit losses in the third quarter of 2009 was due to the large
increase in nonaccrual loans. See Financial Condition Allowance for Loan Losses.
Noninterest income was $3.7 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to ($60.5) million
in the third quarter of 2008 and $7.3 million in the second quarter of 2009. The third quarter of
2008 included $16.7 million in securities losses and a $47.8 million securities impairment loss.
The second quarter of 2009 included $4.3 million of net gains on the securities portfolio
repositioning.
Noninterest expenses decreased $80.6 million to $22.5 million in the third quarter of 2009
compared to $103.0 million in the third quarter of 2008 and were $2.0 million lower than the $24.4
million in the second quarter of 2009. The third quarter of 2008 included an $80.0 million
goodwill impairment charge. The Company also completed its annual goodwill impairment study as of
September 30, 2009 and determined that goodwill was not impaired. The decline in noninterest
expense of $2.0 million in the third quarter of 2009 reflects the impact of the cost reduction
efforts, which began late in the second quarter of 2009. Excluding one time impacts, salaries and
benefits were $1.8 million lower compared to the second quarter reflecting a reduction in force of
77 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees (116 FTE employees, or a 21.6% reduction year to date),
salary reductions for remaining employees, and suspension of the Companys 401(k) contribution.
The decrease in noninterest expenses compared to the previous quarter was also due to the FDIC
insurance special assessment of $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Set forth below are highlights of the nine months ended September 30, 2009 results compared to
the results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $123.1 million, or $4.57 per basic
and diluted share, compared to $162.7 million, or $5.93 per basic and diluted share, for the same
period in 2008. The annualized return on average assets for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 was (4.50)% compared to (5.90)% for the similar period in 2008. The results for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 included a $57.9 million tax charge due to a valuation allowance on
its deferred tax assets and an $8.1 million tax charge related to the liquidation of bank owned
life insurance which was partly offset by the $4.6 million in net gains on the securities portfolio
mainly due to the repositioning. The results of the nine months ended September 30, 2008 included
impairment charges on securities and goodwill of $65.4 million and $80.0 million, respectively, net
losses on securities transactions and extinguishement of debt of $16.6 million and $7.1 million,
respectively, and a gain on the sale of property of $15.2 million. The annualized return on
average equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was (61.15)% compared to (58.64)% for
the similar period in 2008.
Net interest income decreased 13.5% to $58.1 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared
to $67.1 million in the first nine months of 2008 largely due to the repositioning the securities
portfolio into shorter term lower yielding securities in the second quarter of 2009 and the net
interest reversals related to the increase in nonaccrual loans. The net interest margin was 2.30%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 2.83% for the similar period of 2008.
The provision for credit losses was $71.5 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to
$52.4 million for the comparable period in 2008 due to a large increase in nonaccrual loans.
Noninterest income increased to $14.3 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to ($54.3)
million in the same period of 2008. The increase in cash surrender value of life
insurance decreased $1.3 million compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. Noninterest expenses decreased to $68.4 million for the
PAGE 32
nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $151.7 million
for the similar period of 2008. FDIC insurance expense increased
$3.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to
$6.0 million compared to the same period in 2008 due to the FDIC insurance special assessment of $1.7 million and increased
regular quarterly FDIC premiums. The increase in foreclosed
properties expense of $3.6 million and $1.5
million increase in professional services expenses were partly offset by the decrease in salaries and
benefits expense of $4.7 million.
Net Interest Income
The following table sets forth the average balances, net interest income on a tax equivalent
basis and average yields and rates for the Companys interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities for the indicated periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing
deposits due from banks
|
|
$
|
303,890
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,005
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
$
|
59,551
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable(1)
|
|
|
637,198
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
654,531
|
|
|
|
7,823
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
|
|
|
626,489
|
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
Exempt from federal income taxes(1)
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
4.85
|
|
|
|
60,688
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
5.82
|
|
|
|
43,005
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
3.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
639,588
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
715,219
|
|
|
|
8,706
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
|
|
|
669,494
|
|
|
|
5,069
|
|
|
|
3.03
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
|
|
27,999
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
29,694
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
|
30,301
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
527,661
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
5.32
|
|
|
|
544,013
|
|
|
|
8,145
|
|
|
|
5.99
|
|
|
|
549,168
|
|
|
|
6,770
|
|
|
|
4.93
|
|
Commercial real estate
loans(1)(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
1,620,388
|
|
|
|
22,416
|
|
|
|
5.53
|
|
|
|
1,639,444
|
|
|
|
24,919
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
1,675,704
|
|
|
|
24,608
|
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
Agricultural loans(2)(3)
|
|
|
8,350
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
6.37
|
|
|
|
6,531
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
6.31
|
|
|
|
9,991
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
6.57
|
|
Consumer real estate loans(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
343,128
|
|
|
|
3,640
|
|
|
|
4.24
|
|
|
|
314,377
|
|
|
|
4,119
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
|
|
|
343,898
|
|
|
|
3,708
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
Consumer installment loans(2)(3)
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
6.42
|
|
|
|
8,288
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
6.85
|
|
|
|
5,996
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
6.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2,505,134
|
|
|
|
33,294
|
|
|
|
5.32
|
|
|
|
2,512,653
|
|
|
|
37,428
|
|
|
|
5.96
|
|
|
|
2,584,757
|
|
|
|
35,348
|
|
|
|
5.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
3,476,611
|
|
|
$
|
35,135
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,263,571
|
|
|
$
|
46,345
|
|
|
|
5.68
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,344,103
|
|
|
$
|
40,662
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
34,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
40,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(67,605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
165,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-earning assets
|
|
|
173,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,650,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,682,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,660,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
179,094
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
|
$
|
194,416
|
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
178,231
|
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
Money-market demand and savings accounts
|
|
|
344,203
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
393,745
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
358,791
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,765,654
|
|
|
|
10,493
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
1,487,827
|
|
|
|
13,695
|
|
|
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
1,658,904
|
|
|
|
11,267
|
|
|
|
2.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,288,951
|
|
|
|
11,385
|
|
|
|
1.99
|
|
|
|
2,075,988
|
|
|
|
15,301
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
2,195,926
|
|
|
|
12,210
|
|
|
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased, FRB discount
window advances, and repurchase agreements
|
|
|
297,693
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
403,025
|
|
|
|
3,901
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
|
|
|
319,397
|
|
|
|
3,249
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
3,065
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
|
|
|
348,315
|
|
|
|
2,779
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
342,637
|
|
|
|
3,035
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,827
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
60,766
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
5.69
|
|
|
|
60,816
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
|
|
|
9,404
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
4.08
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
4.94
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
777,120
|
|
|
|
7,808
|
|
|
|
4.02
|
|
|
|
891,510
|
|
|
|
8,434
|
|
|
|
3.78
|
|
|
|
801,450
|
|
|
|
7,397
|
|
|
|
3.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
3,066,071
|
|
|
$
|
19,193
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,967,498
|
|
|
$
|
23,735
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,997,376
|
|
|
$
|
19,607
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
341,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
335,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
333,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
33,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
374,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
209,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,650,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,682,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,660,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE 33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Net interest income (tax
equivalent)(1)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,942
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,610
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,055
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (tax
equivalent)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.72
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
113.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109.98
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Adjusted for 35% tax rate and adjusted for the dividends-received deduction, except for the
quarters ended September 30, and June 30, 2009 as a result of the Companys current tax
position.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance; however, these loans are not earning
any interest.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes loan fees of $528, $900, and $574 for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
September 30, 2008, and June 30, 2009, respectively.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes construction loans.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The following table reconciles reported net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
15,942
|
|
|
$
|
22,153
|
|
|
$
|
21,055
|
|
Tax equivalent adjustment to net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, tax equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
15,942
|
|
|
$
|
22,610
|
|
|
$
|
21,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Not adjusted for 35% tax rate or for the dividends-received deduction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing
deposits due from banks
|
|
$
|
123,838
|
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,840
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable(1)
|
|
|
631,184
|
|
|
|
13,091
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
686,517
|
|
|
|
26,901
|
|
|
|
5.22
|
|
Exempt from federal income taxes(1)
|
|
|
34,443
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
61,388
|
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
5.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
665,627
|
|
|
|
14,076
|
|
|
|
2.82
|
|
|
|
747,905
|
|
|
|
29,616
|
|
|
|
5.28
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
|
|
29,986
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
29,397
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
535,755
|
|
|
|
20,336
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
|
|
510,213
|
|
|
|
24,282
|
|
|
|
6.35
|
|
Commercial real estate loans(1)(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
1,653,125
|
|
|
|
71,230
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
1,638,120
|
|
|
|
77,716
|
|
|
|
6.33
|
|
Agricultural loans(2)(3)
|
|
|
8,622
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
6,029
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
6.41
|
|
Consumer real estate loans(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
340,959
|
|
|
|
10,914
|
|
|
|
4.27
|
|
|
|
313,247
|
|
|
|
12,950
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
|
Consumer installment loans(2)(3)
|
|
|
5,951
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
6.61
|
|
|
|
9,843
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
6.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2,544,412
|
|
|
|
103,191
|
|
|
|
5.41
|
|
|
|
2,477,452
|
|
|
|
115,745
|
|
|
|
6.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
3,363,863
|
|
|
$
|
118,063
|
|
|
|
4.68
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,271,594
|
|
|
$
|
146,185
|
|
|
|
5.96
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
49,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
39,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(57,517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,584
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
258,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-earning assets
|
|
|
289,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,653,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,685,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
176,893
|
|
|
$
|
683
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
|
$
|
208,949
|
|
|
$
|
1,660
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
Money-market demand and savings accounts
|
|
|
351,563
|
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
401,377
|
|
|
|
4,209
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,681,472
|
|
|
|
34,436
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
1,468,836
|
|
|
|
44,632
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,209,928
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
2,079,162
|
|
|
|
50,501
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased, FRB discount
window advances and repurchase agreements
|
|
|
316,893
|
|
|
|
9,747
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
418,992
|
|
|
|
12,048
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
348,462
|
|
|
|
9,129
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
|
|
|
319,943
|
|
|
|
8,698
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,814
|
|
|
|
1,851
|
|
|
|
4.06
|
|
|
|
60,749
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
10,073
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
6.14
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
59,927
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
804,769
|
|
|
|
22,684
|
|
|
|
3.76
|
|
|
|
877,911
|
|
|
|
26,292
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
3,014,697
|
|
|
$
|
59,964
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,957,073
|
|
|
$
|
76,793
|
|
|
|
3.46
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
335,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
324,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
34,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE 34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
369,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
269,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,653,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,685,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (tax
equivalent)(1)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
69,392
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (tax
equivalent)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
67,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
111.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Adjusted for 35% tax rate and adjusted for the dividends-received deduction, except for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of the Companys current tax position
|
|
(2)
|
|
Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance; however, these loans are not earning
any interest.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes loan fees of $1,580 and $2,288 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes construction loans.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The following table reconciles reported net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
$
|
67,134
|
|
Tax equivalent adjustment to net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, tax equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
$
|
69,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Not adjusted for 35% tax rate or for the dividends-received deduction.
|
Net interest income is the difference between interest income and fees on earning assets and
interest expense on deposits and borrowings. Net interest margin represents net interest income as
a percentage of average earning assets during the period.
Net interest income decreased by $6.2 million, or 28.0%, to $15.9 million in the third quarter
of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 and decreased by $5.1 million compared to the previous
quarter. Net interest income declined by $9.0 million, or 13.5%, to $58.1 million in the first nine
months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. As a result of the securities portfolio
repositioning in the second quarter, reversals of interest income related to the increase in
nonaccrual loans, and the decrease in loan balances, the net interest margin, on a tax equivalent
basis, decreased to 1.83% for the third quarter of 2009 compared to 2.52% for the second quarter of
2009 and 2.77% for the third quarter of 2008. The net interest margin declined to 2.30% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 2.83% for the same period in 2008, as a result of
the securities portfolio repositioning in the second quarter of 2009, reversals of interest income
related to the increase in nonaccrual loans, and the lower yields earned on loans. Due to the
Companys current tax position, the net interest margin for the 2009 periods does not reflect a
fully taxable-equivalent adjustment.
Trends in Interest-earning Assets
Yields
on average interest-earning assets decreased by 164 basis points in the third quarter of 2009
compared to the third quarter of 2008, while average balances on interest-earning assets increased
by $213.0 million, mainly as the result of the increase in interest-bearing deposits due from
banks. Yields on average interest-earning assets decreased by 82 basis points compared to the second quarter
of 2009. Yields on average earning assets decreased 128 basis points in the first nine months of
2009 compared to the similar period in 2008, while average balances increased $92.3 million. The
decrease in yields was primarily due to the decrease in the overall market rates impacting variable
rate loans, interest foregone on nonaccruing loans, and the decline in interest income on
securities due to the securities portfolio repositioning into shorter term, lower yielding
securities.
Average yields on loans for the third quarter of 2009 decreased by 15 basis points to 5.32%
compared to the second quarter of 2009 and were 64 basis points lower compared to the same period
in 2008. For the first
PAGE 35
nine months of 2009, average yields on loans decreased by 82 basis points to
5.41% compared to the same period of 2008. This decline in yields was primarily due to the
re-pricing of the variable rate loans resulting from decreases in the prime rate which was
partially mitigated by interest rate floors. Average loans decreased
by $7.5 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008
and decreased by $79.6 million compared to the second quarter of 2009. Average loans increased by
$67.0 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Yields on average securities decreased in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the prior
quarter and the same period in 2008 by 208 basis points and 392 basis points, respectively, due
largely to the repositioning of the securities portfolio into shorter term lower, yielding
securities. Average securities decreased by $75.6 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to
the similar period in 2008 and decreased by $29.9 million compared to the second quarter of 2009,
mainly due to sales. Yields on average securities decreased by 246 basis points in the first nine
months of 2009 compared to the similar period in 2008 and average balances decreased by $82.3
million.
During second quarter of 2009, the Company repositioned its securities portfolio to lower
capital requirements associated with higher risk-weighted assets, restructure expected cash flows,
reduce credit risk, and enhance the Banks asset sensitivity. The Company sold $538.1 million of
its securities portfolio with an average yield of 3.94% and average life of slightly over two
years. These securities were sold in the open market at a net gain of $4.3 million. The Company
purchased $571.0 million of U.S. Treasury bills and Government National Mortgage Association
mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on these securities is 0.43% with an average life of
less than six months.
Trends in Interest-bearing Liabilities
The Companys cost of funds decreased by 12 basis points on a linked-quarter basis as a result
of decreased rates paid on interest-bearing deposits. Average interest-bearing liabilities
increased by $68.7 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared to the prior quarter. Yields on
average interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 70 basis points due to the lower costs of
interest-bearing deposits, while average balances increased $98.6 million in the third quarter of
2009 compared to the similar period in 2008. When compared to the first nine months of 2008, the
cost of funds decreased by 81 basis points to 2.65% for the first nine months of 2009 due to the
lower costs of interest-bearing deposits, while average interest-bearing liabilities increased
$57.6 million.
Average interest-bearing deposits increased by $213.0 million, while average rates decreased
96 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the similar period of 2008. Average rates
paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased by 23 basis points to 1.99% for the third quarter of
2009 compared to the second quarter of 2009, but average balances increased by $93.0 million.
Yields on average interest-bearing deposits decreased by 99 basis points in the first nine months
of 2009 compared to the similar period in 2008, and average balances increased by $130.8 million.
Most of the decrease in average rates was in certificates of deposit that matured and re-priced at
lower rates.
Average interest-bearing demand deposit, money market, and savings accounts decreased by $13.7
million for the third quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2009 and decreased by $64.9
million compared to the third quarter of 2008. On a year-to-date basis, average interest-bearing
demand deposit, money market, and savings accounts decreased by $81.9 million compared to 2008.
The costs of average borrowings increased by 24 basis points in the third quarter of 2009
compared to the same period in 2008, while average balances decreased by $114.4 million. Less
reliance on borrowings was largely due to increased funds from deposits. Average borrowings
decreased by $24.3 million in the third quarter of 2009 over the second quarter of 2009, while
average rates paid increased by 33 basis points to 4.02%
PAGE 36
due to the increase to the default rates
on the revolving and term notes payable. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, average
borrowings decreased by $73.1 million and average rates paid decreased by 23 basis points, largely
due to decreases in short-term LIBOR rates.
Noninterest Income
Set forth below is a summary of the third quarter 2009 noninterest income activity compared to
the third quarter of 2008 and second quarter of 2009.
The annualized noninterest income to average assets ratio was 0.40% for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to (6.54)% for the same period in 2008 and 0.80% for the three months
ended June 30, 2009, as a result of the changes in noninterest income discussed below. Noninterest
income was $3.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $64.2 million
over the comparable period in 2008. Noninterest income for third quarter of 2008 included losses
on securities transactions of $16.7 million and an impairment charge on securities of $47.8
million. Noninterest income for the third quarter of 2009 was $3.6 million lower than the second
quarter of 2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to the net gains less impairment charges
on the securities portfolio repositioning of $3.5 million recognized in the second quarter of 2009.
Service charges on deposits in the third quarter of 2009 were flat at $2.0 million when
compared to the same period in 2008 and the second quarter of 2009. Insurance and brokerage
commissions for the three months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by $180,000, or 40.2%, to
$268,000 when compared to the third quarter of 2008, and decreased by $70,000 when compared to the
second quarter of 2009. These decreases are mostly due to the difficult economy. Trust income
decreased by $114,000 in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 due to the
decreased value of trust assets under management but increased by $41,000 compared to the second
quarter of 2009. Income from the increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance decreased
by $911,000 and $491,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the similar
period in 2008 and the second quarter of 2009, respectively, reflecting the liquidation of the bank
owned life insurance during the second quarter of 2009.
Set forth below is a summary of the nine months ended September 30, 2009 noninterest income
activity compared to the same period in 2008.
The
annualized noninterest income to average assets ratio was 0.52% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to (1.97)% for the same period in 2008, as a result of the changes in
noninterest income discussed below. Noninterest income was $14.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, an increase of $68.6 million over the comparable period in 2008. In the first
nine months of 2008, the Company recognized an impairment charge on securities of $65.4 million,
net losses of $16.6 million on securities transactions, and a gain on the sale of property of $15.2
million.
Service charges on deposits in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were flat at $5.9
million when compared to the same period in 2008. Insurance and brokerage commissions for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by $765,000, or 45.2%, when compared to the same period
in 2008, mostly due to the difficult economy causing a lower volume of transactions. Trust income
decreased by $467,000 in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008,
partially due to market value decreases and loss of accounts. Trust income is largely based on a
percentage of assets under management. Income from the increase in the cash surrender value of
life insurance decreased by 49.4% to $1.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the similar period in 2008, reflecting the liquidation of the bank owned life insurance
in the second quarter of 2009.
PAGE 37
Noninterest Expenses
Set forth below is a summary of the third quarter 2009 noninterest expenses compared to the
third quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2009.
The annualized noninterest expenses to average assets ratio was 2.44% for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to 11.16% for the same period in 2008 and 2.76% for the three
months ended June 30, 2009, as a result of the changes in noninterest expense discussed below.
Total noninterest expenses decreased by $80.6 million, to $22.5 million during the third quarter of
2009 compared to $103.0 million for the similar period in 2008. Noninterest expenses for third
quarter of 2008 included a goodwill impairment charge of $80.0 million. The decline in noninterest
expense of $2.0 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to
the second quarter of 2009 reflects the impact of the cost reduction
efforts, which began late in the second quarter of 2009. Excluding one time impacts, salaries and
benefits were $1.8 million lower compared to the second quarter reflecting a reduction in force of
77 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees (116 FTE employees, or a 21.6% reduction year to date),
salary reductions for remaining employees, and the suspension of the Companys 401(k) contribution.
The decrease in noninterest expenses compared to the previous quarter was also due to the FDIC
insurance special assessment of $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Salaries and benefits expense decreased by $3.6 million, or 28.5%, during the third quarter of
2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 and by $2.9 million, or 24.5%, compared to the second
quarter of 2009, due to the cost reduction initiatives described above as well as the decrease in
incentive and stock based compensation expenses. Occupancy and equipment expense was relatively
flat during the third quarter of 2009 at $3.2 million compared to the similar period in 2008, but
decreased by $181,000, or 5.4%, compared to the second quarter of 2009, mainly due to decreased
rent and maintenance expenses. Professional services expense rose by $822,000 to $2.8 million in
the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008. Professional services expense
increased by $948,000 compared to the second quarter of 2009. This increase was due to the
increased legal and consulting fees related to capital plan activities, the goodwill study, and
loan portfolio credit-loss studies. Marketing expenses in the third quarter of 2009 were $374,000
lower than in the third quarter of 2008 and $138,000 lower than the second quarter of 2009, as
certain programs were scaled back or put on hold in order to control costs. Foreclosed properties
expense increased in the third quarter of 2009 by $3.1 million and $2.6 million compared to the
third quarter of 2008 and second quarter of 2009, respectively, due to the increase in foreclosed
properties and the write-down of certain properties to current fair
value less costs to sell. The
average balance of foreclosed properties was $20.8 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared
to $18.7 million for the second quarter of 2009.
Set forth below is a summary of noninterest expenses for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
The annualized noninterest expenses to average assets ratio was 2.50% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to 5.52% for the same period in 2008. Total noninterest expenses
decreased $83.3 million to $68.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to $151.7 million for the similar period in 2008. The Company recognized a goodwill impairment
charge of $80.0 million and a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $7.1 million resulting
from the prepayment of $130.0 million in advances from the FHLB in 2008.
Salaries and benefits expense decreased by $4.7 million, or 12.8%, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, which was due in large part to decrease of
$2.9 million in incentive expense and $1.4 million in stock-based compensation expense. This
decrease was also due to the reduction in force of 130 FTE employees from September 30, 2008,
salary reductions for remaining employees, and the suspension of the Companys 401(k) contribution.
Occupancy and equipment expense increased by $573,000, or 6.2%, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 to $9.8 million compared to the similar period in 2009 mainly due to increased
rent and maintenance expenses. Professional services expense rose by $1.5
PAGE 38
million, or 27.7%, to $6.8 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 due to higher
legal, including legal expenses related to problem loan workouts, and consulting expenses related
to capital plan activities, the goodwill study, and loan portfolio credit-loss studies. Marketing
expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $1.2 million, or 34.1% lower than in the
same period in 2008, as certain programs were scaled back or put on hold in an effort to control
costs. Foreclosed properties expense increased in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 by $3.6
million compared to the same period in 2008, due to the increase in foreclosed properties and the write-down of certain
properties to updated fair values less costs to sell. Foreclosed properties were $21.0 million at
September 30, 2009 compared to $12.0 million at year end 2008. FDIC insurance expense increased
$3.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $6.0 million compared to the same
period in 2008 due to the special assessment of $1.7 million and increased regular quarterly FDIC
premiums.
Income Taxes
The Company recorded income tax expense of $966,000 and an income tax benefit of $23.9 million
for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, the Company recorded income tax expense of $55.6 million compared to an income
tax benefit of $28.5 million for the same period of 2008. The change in the effective tax rate
reflects $57.9 million related to the recognition of a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
and the $8.1 million tax charge related to the liquidation of bank owned life insurance in the
second quarter of 2009. The Companys marginal tax rate is approximately 40%; however, under
current conditions the Company would expect to offset any tax benefits earned with similar
increases in the valuation allowance.
The difference between the provision for income taxes in the consolidated financial statements
and amounts computed by applying the current federal statutory income tax rate of 35% to income
before income taxes is reconciled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Income taxes computed at the statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(14,105
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(64,262
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(23,603
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(66,931
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Tax-exempt interest income on securities and loans
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
General business credits
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
due to state operating loss
|
|
|
(2,388
|
)
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
(2,137
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(2,607
|
)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
(2,898
|
)
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Life insurance cash surrender value increase, net of premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(922
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Liquidation of bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,924
|
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received deduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
17,397
|
|
|
|
(43.2
|
)
|
|
|
14,851
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
75,259
|
|
|
|
( 111.7
|
)
|
|
|
14,851
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
Nondeductible costs and other, net
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(23,891
|
)
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
55,617
|
|
|
|
(82.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(28,530
|
)
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company increased the total valuation allowance by $16.9 million to $76.9 million against
its existing net deferred tax assets during the third quarter of 2009. The valuation allowance
includes $1.6 million recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss fully offsetting deferred
taxes which were established for securities available for sale and for the SERP program. The
Companys primary deferred tax assets relate to its allowance for loan losses, net operating losses
(NOLs) and impairment charges relating to FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock holdings. Under
generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation allowance is required to be recognized if it
is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized. In making that
determination, management is required to evaluate both positive and negative evidence including
recent historical financial performance, forecasts of future income, tax planning strategies and
assessments of the current and future economic and business conditions. The Company performs and
updates this evaluation on a quarterly basis.
PAGE 39
In conducting its regular quarterly evaluation, the Company made a determination to maintain
the valuation allowance as of September 30, 2009 based primarily upon the existence of a three year
cumulative loss derived by combining the pre-tax income (loss) reported during the two most recent
annual periods (calendar years ended 2007 and 2008) with managements current projected results for
the year ending 2009. This three year cumulative loss position is primarily attributable to
significant provisions for loan losses incurred and currently forecasted during the three years
ending 2009 and losses realized during 2008 on its FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock holdings. The Companys current financial forecasts indicate
that taxable income will be generated in the future. However, the existing deferred tax benefits
may not be fully realized due to statutory limitations on their utilization based on the Companys
planned capital restructuring. The creation and subsequent addition to the valuation allowance,
although it increased tax expense for the second and third quarters and similarly reduced tangible
book values, did not have an effect on the Companys cash flows. The remaining net deferred tax
assets of $4.1 million are supported by available tax planning strategies. The Company expects
valuation allowance adjustments equal to any tax expense or benefits
earned; therefore, it expects
an effective rate of 0% in the near term.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company liquidated its $85.8 million investment in bank
owned life insurance in order to reduce the Companys investment risk and its risk-weighted assets
which favorably impacted the Banks regulatory capital ratios. The $16.3 million increase in cash
surrender value of the policies since the time of purchase was treated as ordinary income for tax
purposes. Additionally, a 10% IRS excise tax was incurred as a result of the liquidation. As a
result, the Company recorded federal tax expense of $6.9 million and an additional state tax
expense of $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2009 for this transaction.
Financial Condition
The Company has improved the quality of the Banks balance sheet over the past two quarters
through building of loan loss reserves, repositioning of the
securities portfolio to provide a high level of liquidity and re-assessing the valuation of its deferred tax assets, while
maintaining the Banks regulatory capital ratios as the Company executes a complex and
comprehensive Capital Plan.
Set forth below are balance sheet highlights at September 30, 2009 compared to December 31,
2008 and September 30, 2008.
|
|
Total assets decreased $26.1 million at September 30, 2009 compared to year end 2008 and
were down $39.2 million compared to September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents increased $264.4 million at September 30, 2009 compared to year
end 2008 and were up $214.0 million compared to September 30, 2008 improving the liquidity
position.
|
|
|
|
Total loans decreased $55.7 million to $2.5 billion at September 30, 2009 compared to year
end 2008 and by $40.1 million over the third quarter of 2008, partly due to stricter
underwriting standards and charge-offs.
|
|
|
|
The $85.8 million investment in bank owned life insurance was liquidated during the second
quarter of 2009 in order to reduce the Companys investment risk and the Banks regulatory
capital requirement.
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009, the Company established a valuation allowance of $60.0 million against
its existing net deferred tax assets. The Company increased the valuation allowance by $16.9
million to $76.9 million against its existing net deferred tax assets during the third
quarter of 2009.
|
|
|
|
Deposits increased by $142.4 million to $2.6 billion at September 30, 2009 compared to year
end
|
PAGE 40
|
|
2008 and increased by $42.2 million when compared to September 30, 2008, mainly as a
result of successful certificate of deposit promotions.
|
Set forth below are asset quality highlights at September 30, 2009 compared to December 31,
2008 and September 30, 2008.
|
|
The downturn in the commercial and residential real estate markets continued to have a
material negative impact on the Companys loan portfolio, resulting in a significant
deterioration in credit quality and an increase in loan losses and its allowance for loan losses. The Company believes it is
likely that the credit quality of its loan portfolio will further deteriorate through the end
of 2009.
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans were 7.90% of total loans at September 30, 2009, up from 2.43% of total
loans at year end and 2.42% at September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed properties increased from $12.0 million at year end to $21.0 million at
September 30, 2009, mainly due to the foreclosure action on three large loan relationships.
|
|
|
|
Loan delinquencies of 30-89 days were 3.24% of loans at September 30, 2009, up from 1.03%
at December 31, 2008 and 0.99% at September 30, 2008, due to the continued deterioration of
economic conditions.
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets were 6.06% of total assets at September 30, 2009, up from 2.36% at
year end and 1.91% at September 30, 2008, as a result of the increase in nonaccrual loans and
foreclosed properties.
|
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses was 3.40% of total loans as of September 30, 2009, versus
1.77% at year end 2008 and 1.58% at September 30, 2008, due to a $69.7 million provision in
the first nine months of 2009 with net charge-offs of $30.6 million during that period.
|
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans ratio was 43.07% at September 30, 2009,
72.72% at year end, and 65.20% for the corresponding period of 2008.
|
Loans
Average total loans decreased $79.6 million during the third quarter of 2009. From June 30,
2009 to September 30, 2009, loans outstanding declined $105.2 million, primarily due to stricter
underwriting standards. Average loans yielded 5.32% in the third quarter of 2009, compared to
5.47% in the second quarter of 2009, with 82% of all loans tied to prime having interest rate
floors in place and 78% of those loans currently at their floors.
PAGE 41
The following table sets forth the composition of the Companys loan portfolio on a source of
repayment basis as of the indicated dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
1,045,533
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,090,078
|
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
324,074
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
366,178
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
744,464
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
729,729
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
227,966
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
194,673
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
5,583
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
107,124
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
123,161
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross
|
|
|
2,454,744
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,510,151
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
$
|
2,454,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,509,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans decreased $55.7 million at September 30, 2009 from December 31, 2008. Total loans
decreased by $105.2 million from the second quarter of 2009. Set forth below are other highlights
of the loan portfolio. The Company expects to see continued portfolio declines in the near term due
to its emphasis on underwriting and pricing discipline begun in the second quarter of 2009.
|
|
Commercial loans decreased $44.5 million to $1.0 billion as of September 30, 2009 from
December 31, 2008 and comprise 42.6% of the loan portfolio.
|
|
|
|
Construction loans decreased by $42.1 million to $324.1 million, or 13.2% of the loan
portfolio, as of September 30, 2009 from $366.2 million and 14.6% at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans increased by $14.7 million to $744.5 million, or 30.3% of the
loan portfolio, as of September 30, 2009 from $729.7 million and 29.1% at year end.
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans increased by $33.3 million to $228.0 million, or 9.3% of the loan
portfolio, as of September 30, 2009 from $194.7 million at year end.
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans decreased by $16.0 million to $107.1 million as of September 30,
2009 from $123.2 million at year end.
|
|
|
|
The Company does not hold any sub-prime loans in its residential mortgage portfolio.
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses has been established to provide for those loans that may not be
repaid in their entirety for a variety of reasons. The allowance is maintained at a level
considered by management to be adequate to provide for probable incurred losses. The allowance is
increased by provisions charged to earnings and is reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. The
provision for loan losses is based upon past loan loss experience and managements evaluation of
the loan portfolio under current economic conditions. Loans are charged to the allowance for loan
losses when, and to the extent, they are deemed by management to be uncollectible. The allowance
for loan losses is comprised of allocations for specific loans and a historical loss based portion
for all other loans.
PAGE 42
Following is a summary of activity in the allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance, at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
63,893
|
|
|
$
|
22,606
|
|
|
$
|
44,432
|
|
|
$
|
26,748
|
|
Provision charged to operations
|
|
|
36,700
|
|
|
|
41,950
|
|
|
|
69,700
|
|
|
|
51,765
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(17,723
|
)
|
|
|
(25,224
|
)
|
|
|
(32,268
|
)
|
|
|
(40,472
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
1,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off
|
|
|
(17,087
|
)
|
|
|
(25,128
|
)
|
|
|
(30,626
|
)
|
|
|
(39,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at end of period
|
|
$
|
83,506
|
|
|
$
|
39,428
|
|
|
$
|
83,506
|
|
|
$
|
39,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded a provision for loan losses of $36.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 reflecting managements assessment of impaired loans, specific reserves
associated with loans identified as impaired during the quarter, the migration of loans not
specifically analyzed for impairment into higher credit risk rating categories, and the continued
deterioration of economic conditions.
A provision for loan losses of $69.7 million was taken for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to $51.8 million for the similar period in 2008, reflecting managements updated
assessments of impaired loans and the continued deterioration of economic conditions. The Company
had net charge-offs of $30.6 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to $39.1 million
for the same period in 2008.
The Company had a reserve for losses on unfunded commitments of $2.1 million at September 30,
2009, up from $1.1 million at December 31, 2008 and $793,000 at September 30, 2008.
The following table sets forth certain asset quality ratios related to the allowance for loan
losses on a quarter-to-date basis as of the indicated dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off to average loans during quarter
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
|
|
2.39
|
%
|
|
|
3.98
|
%
|
Provision for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
5.93
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
|
6.69
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
Allowance to nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
0.43x
|
|
|
|
0.73x
|
|
|
|
0.65x
|
|
The Company recognizes that credit losses will be experienced and the risk of loss will vary
with, among other things; general economic conditions; the type of loan being made; the
creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan; and in the case of a collateralized
loan, the quality of the collateral. The allowance for loan losses represents the Companys
estimate of the amount deemed necessary to provide for probable losses existing in the portfolio.
In making this determination, the Company analyzes the ultimate collectibility of the loans in its
portfolio by incorporating feedback provided by internal loan staff. Each loan officer grades his
or her individual commercial credits and the Companys loan review personnel independently review
the officers grades.
In the event that the loan is downgraded during this review, the loan is included in the
allowance analysis at the lower grade. On a quarterly basis, management of the Bank meets to review
the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
Estimating the amount of the allowance for loan losses requires significant judgment and the
use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans,
estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and
consideration of current economic trends
PAGE 43
and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to
significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the consolidated balance sheet. Loan losses are charged off against the
allowance, while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the allowance. A
provision for loan losses is charged to operations based on managements periodic evaluation of the
factors previously mentioned, as well as other pertinent factors.
The Companys methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses represents an
estimation performed pursuant to the authoritative guidance for contingencies (ASC 450) and loan
impairments (ASC 310-10-35). The allowance reflects expected losses resulting from analyses
developed through specific credit allocations for individual loans and historical loss experience
for each loan category. The specific credit allocations are based on regular analyses of all loans
over $300,000 where the internal credit rating is at or below a predetermined classification. These
analyses involve a high degree of judgment in estimating the amount of loss associated with
specific loans, including estimating the amount and timing of future cash flows and collateral
values. The allowance for loan losses also includes consideration of
concentrations, changes in
portfolio mix and volume, loan risk ratings and other qualitative factors.
During the third quarter of 2009, steps were taken to improve the credit review function. The
Company strengthened its portfolio review process, tracking of credit trends and documentation of
exceptions. The Company devoted additional resources to its loan workout unit and engaged an
independent firm to actively manage problem loans.
With the additional resources devoted to the loan workout area, management has sharpened its
understanding of the factors impacting the primary and secondary sources of repayment and
collateral support, and has used this information in the risk ratings and other classifications
utilized in the computation of the allowance for loan losses. In determining loan specific
reserves in the allowance for loan losses, the Company generally assigns average discounts of
20-35% to independent appraisal values, dependent upon loan and collateral type. These discount
rates have been adjusted upward in recent periods based upon the rapid deterioration in the current
Chicago commercial real estate market. As a result, although the Companys allowance for loan
losses to nonperforming loans ratio dropped to 43% as of September 30, 2009, from a range of 58-62%
during December 2008 through June 2009, specific reserves to loans analyzed for possible impairment
increased to 20% from 7% as of December 31, 2008 and 15% as of
June 30, 2009.
In the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a provision for loan losses of $36.7
million and recognized net loan charge-offs totaling $17.1 million. Nonaccrual loans increased
$98.9 million compared to the prior quarter to $193.9 million, or 7.9 percent of loans. As
nonaccrual loans have increased throughout 2009, the provision for loan losses has been double net
charge-offs for each quarter reflecting this deterioration and the ratio of allowance for loan
losses to loans increased significantly to 3.40% at September 30, 2009, from 2.50% at June 30, 2009
and 1.58% at September 30, 2008.
Management
computes and provides to the Board of Directors various allowance for loan loss and
other credit quality ratios as one tool to assist in comparing and understanding changes from
previous periods and to the relative performance of its peers. These reviews are performed to
better understand changes in credit quality over time and to determine the reasonableness of the
level of the allowance for loan losses. Although these ratios provide useful benchmarks, this
analysis is just one tool used to determine that the level of the allowance for loan losses is
adequate.
There are many factors affecting the allowance for loan losses; some are quantitative while
others require qualitative judgment. The process for determining the allowance (which management
believes adequately considers all of the factors which potentially result in credit losses)
includes subjective elements and, therefore, the allowance may be susceptible to significant
change. To the extent actual outcomes differ
PAGE 44
from management estimates, additional provisions for loan losses could be required that may adversely affect the Companys earnings or financial position in future periods.
Key
lending personnel have been re-assigned to the Companys special
assets (loan workout) group in the second quarter of 2009.
The Bank has devoted additional resources to its workout unit and engaged an independent firm to
actively manage problem loans.
Nonaccrual Loans and Nonperforming Assets
Nonaccrual loans increased by $132.8 million to $193.9 million at September 30, 2009 from
December 31, 2008. Nonperforming assets were $214.9 million at September 30, 2009 compared to
$84.1 million at December 31, 2008. The Company had $11.0 million in troubled-debt restructuring to
one borrower as of December 31, 2008 which went to nonaccrual status during the third quarter of
2009.
The following table sets forth information on the Companys nonaccrual loans and nonperforming
assets as of the indicated dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
$
|
23,653
|
|
|
$
|
3,559
|
|
|
$
|
13,038
|
|
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied
|
|
|
56,715
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
26,836
|
|
Commercial real estate owner occupied
|
|
|
22,423
|
|
|
|
14,244
|
|
|
|
17,611
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
55,920
|
|
|
|
20,726
|
|
|
|
24,444
|
|
Vacant land
|
|
|
24,962
|
|
|
|
6,550
|
|
|
|
5,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and commercial real estate
|
|
|
183,673
|
|
|
|
55,389
|
|
|
|
87,385
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
8,032
|
|
|
|
5,315
|
|
|
|
5,584
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
10,204
|
|
|
|
5,715
|
|
|
|
7,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
193,877
|
|
|
|
61,104
|
|
|
|
95,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trouble debt restructured loans (commercial real
estate non-owner occupied)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,006
|
|
|
|
11,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
|
193,877
|
|
|
|
72,110
|
|
|
|
106,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
20,980
|
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
|
|
19,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
214,857
|
|
|
$
|
84,128
|
|
|
$
|
125,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to loans
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
|
|
2.43
|
%
|
|
|
3.71
|
%
|
Nonperforming assets to loans and foreclosed properties
|
|
|
8.68
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
|
Nonperforming assets to assets
|
|
|
6.06
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
There were no impaired and other loans 90 days past due and accruing at September 30, 2009,
December 31, 2008, or September 30, 2008.
Nonaccrual commercial loans increased by $20.1 million from December 31, 2008 to September 30,
2009, in part due to the following relationships:
|
|
a $6.2 million loan relationship secured by business assets and retail and office
buildings to a company that markets to real estate agents and brokers;
|
|
|
|
a $6.5 million loan to a company that markets to real estate
agents and brokers that has been negatively affected by the real
estate downturn;
|
|
|
|
a $2.8 million loan relationship with an energy company
currently operating under a forbearance agreement;
|
|
|
|
a $2.8 million loan relationship with a full-service
tradeshow display company where the recent death of the principal
caused a disruption in its business operations. This borrower is
currently operating under a forbearance agreement;
|
|
|
|
a $2.8 million ($0.6 million commercial and industrial and $2.2 million commercial real
estate) loan relationship with a full-service tradeshow display company secured by business
assets where the recent death of the principal caused a disruption in its business
operations. This borrower is currently operating under a forbearance agreement; and
|
PAGE 45
|
|
a $0.8 million loan relationship secured by retail and office properties to a banker.
|
Nonaccrual commercial real estate and construction loans increased by $108.2 million from
December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009, due in large part to the following relationships:
|
|
a $12.6 million loan relationship related to a construction project for several
projects in and near Lake County, Illinois;
|
|
|
|
a $11.0 million loan relationship with collateral located in a western suburb of
Chicago, consisting of improved lots on 25 acres. The property value has declined and
there are currently no units under contract. The guarantors have limited liquidity and net
worth and continue efforts to raise equity to fund the real estate investment;
|
|
|
|
a $9.5 million loan relationship that consists of several loans for various commercial
properties in Cook County, Illinois. Third party real estate management and marketing firms
have been engaged by the borrower. The management company is focusing on stabilizing
buildings, renewing leases and seeking new tenants. The properties securing the loans have
experienced increased vacancies and resulting decreases in operating income to provide
sufficient cash flow to meet contractual loan payments. The guarantor has limited
liquidity;
|
|
|
|
a $8.6 million loan relationship secured with 26 acres of property on in McHenry
County. The borrowers plans to sell portions of the property have taken longer than
expected. The guarantor adds only limited financial support;
|
|
|
|
a $6.5 million loan relationship, of which $2.5 million has been charged off, secured
with a project located in Cook County experiencing slow sales. The properties securing the
loans have not sold with the borrower now renting properties at a level that is not
sufficient to meet contractual loan payments. There are multiple guarantors who have
limited liquidity;
|
|
|
|
a $5.3 million loan relationship secured with property where the development has
stalled and the guarantor is considering alternative strategies to sell or liquidate the
assets. The guarantor is currently providing contractual payments; however, in the future
their liquidity position will no longer enable them to continue to meet loan repayment
terms;
|
|
|
|
a $4.9 million loan relationship to a residential homebuilder originated in 2003 for a
commercial property in a western suburb of Chicago which has been stalled due to on-going
litigation with the local municipality. Total credit exposure to this customer is $8.6
million;
|
|
|
|
a $4.1 million loan relationship secured by three single family residences with a
contractor for the development of those properties in northern suburbs of Chicago which
have been slow to sell; and
|
|
|
|
a $2.4 million ($1.5 million commercial real estate and $0.9 million vacant land) loan
relationship secured by single and multi-family residences and vacant land impacted by
local economic conditions.
|
In addition to the loans summarized above, at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Company had $74.8 million and $71.0 million of loans that are currently performing, which, however, have
been internally assigned higher credit risk ratings. The higher risk ratings are primarily due to
internally identified specific or collective credit characteristics including decreased capacity to
repay loan obligations due to adverse market conditions, a lack of borrower or guarantors capital
capacity and reduced collateral valuations securing
PAGE 46
the loans as a secondary source of repayment. These loans continue to accrue interest. Management does not expect losses on these loans, but
recognizes that a higher level of scrutiny is prudent under the circumstances.
Foreclosed properties were $21.0 million at September 30, 2009, an increase of $9.0 million
compared to year end mainly due to three new properties: $5.1 million related to multiple
properties including vacant land parcels and an office building, $995,000 related to residential
property, and $913,000 related to commercial and residential properties. Certain foreclosed
properties were written down to current fair value less costs to sell during the third quarter of
2009 and a corresponding charge of $2.6 million was recorded in foreclosed properties expense.
Securities
The Company manages its securities portfolio to provide a source of both liquidity and
earnings. The investment policy is developed in conjunction with established asset/liability
committee directives. The investment policy is reviewed by senior management of the Company in
terms of its objectives, investment guidelines and consistency with overall Company performance and
risk management goals. The investment policy is formally reviewed and approved annually by the
Board of Directors. The asset/liability committee of is responsible for reporting and monitoring
compliance with the investment policy. Reports are provided to the asset/liability committee and
the Board of Directors of the Company on a regular basis.
The following tables set forth the composition of the Companys securities portfolio by major
category as of September 30, 2009. No securities classified as
held-to-maturity were held at September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
451,785
|
|
|
$
|
451,792
|
|
|
|
73.1
|
%
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential (1)
|
|
|
147,043
|
|
|
|
147,003
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities (2)
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored
entities (3)
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
14,979
|
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
618,551
|
|
|
$
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes obligations of FHLMC.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with related unrealized net gains or
losses, net of deferred income taxes, recorded as an adjustment to other comprehensive loss. At
September 30, 2009, unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale were $3.0 million compared
to unrealized losses of $2.4 million, or $1.4 million net of taxes, at December 31, 2008. A
deferred income tax adjustment to the carrying value was not recorded as a result of the Companys
tax position at September 30, 2009.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company repositioned its securities portfolio to lower
capital requirements associated with higher risk-weighted assets, restructure expected cash flows,
reduce credit risk, and enhance the Banks asset sensitivity. The Company sold $538.1 million of
its securities portfolio with an average yield of 3.94% and average life of slightly over two
years. The securities sold included U.S. government-sponsored entities debentures, mortgage-backed
securities, and municipal bonds. These securities were sold in the open market at a net gain of
$4.3 million. The Company purchased $571.0 million of U.S.
PAGE 47
Treasury bills and Government National Mortgage Association mortgage-backed securities. The average
yield on these securities is 0.43% with an average life of less than six months. The Company
reinvested and will continue to reinvest into higher-yielding securities as opportunities present
themselves.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company still held $27.6 million in five securities, including
municipal bonds and U.S. government-sponsored entities mortgage-backed securities, that were
ear-marked for sale under this portfolio repositioning program. Consistent with that program and
the Companys stated intent to sell these securities, and the Company recognized a $740,000
other-than-temporary impairment charge during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. As of September 30,
2009, the Company continued to hold two of the five securities with balances totaling $2.0 million,
which included a municipal bond and a mortgage-backed security of a U.S. government-sponsored entity that were
identified for sale under this portfolio repositioning program, which were not impaired as of that
date. The three securities sold during the third quarter resulted in a net gain of $136,000.
During the second quarter of 2009, as a part of its repositioning program, the Company sold
its entire portfolio of securities held-to-maturity of $27.7 million at a net gain of $117,000.
Securities available-for-sale decreased by $6.4 million to $615.5 million at September 30,
2009 from December 31, 2008. Set forth below are other highlights of the securities portfolio.
|
|
U.S. Treasury and obligations of U.S. government-sponsored entities increased by $186.4
million to $451.8 million, or 73.1% of the portfolio, at September 30, 2009 compared to
$265.4 million at year end. At September 30, 2009, the Companys holdings in this category
consisted of only U.S. Treasury bills with maturities of less than four months.
|
|
|
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities decreased
$134.9 million, from $283.7 million at December 31, 2008 to $148.8 million at September 30,
2009.
|
|
|
Equity securities increased $2.9 million to $3.9 million at September 30, 2009 from
December 31, 2008 as a result of the increase in fair market value.
|
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities decreased by $4.4 million to $10.9 million at September
30, 2009 from $15.2 million at December 31, 2008 as a result of a sale transaction.
|
|
|
The securities portfolio does not contain any sub-prime or Alt-A mortgage-backed
securities.
|
Certain available-for-sale securities were temporarily impaired at September 30, 2009,
primarily due to changes in interest rates as well as current economic conditions that appear to be
cyclical in nature. With respect to the largest unrealized loss position, the Company has
approximately 155.8% senior collateral coverage related to this security. The unrealized losses on
equity securities relate to the preferred equity securities issued by FNMA which were rated Ca and
C by Moodys and S&P, respectively, as of September 30, 2009. The dividend on these equity
securities were suspended beginning in late 2008.
The Company does not intend to sell nor would it be required to sell the temporarily impaired
securities before recovering their amortized cost. See Note 5 Securities to the unaudited
consolidated financial statements for more details.
Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company liquidated its entire $85.8 million investment
in bank owned life insurance in order to reduce the Companys investment risk and risk-weighted
assets, which favorably impacted the Banks regulatory capital ratios. The $16.3 million increase
in cash surrender value of
48
the policies since the time of purchase was treated as ordinary income
for tax purposes. Additionally, a 10% IRS excise tax was incurred as a result of the liquidation. The Company recorded a tax expense
of $8.1 million in the second quarter of 2009 for this transaction.
Goodwill
Goodwill was $78.9 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Consistent with
established policy, an annual review for goodwill impairment as of September 30, 2009 was conducted
with the assistance of a nationally recognized third party valuation specialist. Based upon that
review, the Company determined that the $78.9 million goodwill recorded on the September 30, 2009
balance sheet was not impaired.
As a result of our previous annual test performed at September 30, 2008, the Company
determined goodwill was impaired and recorded an $80.0 million impairment to reduce the goodwill
balance to $78.9 million. Under the authoritative guidance for intangibles goodwill and other
(ASC 350), a goodwill impairment test could be triggered between annual testing dates if an event
occurred or circumstances changed that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of goodwill
below the carrying amount. During each of the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009,
management considered whether events and circumstances would require an interim test of goodwill
impairment. Management concluded that it was not more likely than not that these events and
changes in circumstances, both individually and in the aggregate, reduced the fair value of the
Companys single reporting unit below its carrying amount. Managements analysis was based on and
considered changes in the key indicators and inputs consistent with those included in our previous
annual review such as stock price, estimated control premium, future available cash flows, market
multiples, business strategy, credit quality metrics, loan growth, core deposits and regulatory
capital requirements along with interest rates, credit spreads and collateral values.
Following is a summary of the methodologies employed to conduct the Companys testing at
September 30, 2009, the underlying assumptions and related rationale in the context of current
facts and circumstances, and how the methodologies employed compared with those used in the prior
year test.
The Company operates in one operating segment, community banking, as defined in the
authoritative guidance for segment reporting (ASC 280) and currently does not internally report its
operating income below that level or provide such information to its CEO, the companys chief
operating decision maker. For this reason, the Company performs its goodwill impairment test as
one reporting unit at the consolidated Company level.
The methods for estimating the value of the Company under Step 1 of the goodwill impairment
test included a weighted average of the discounted cash flow method, the guideline company method
and the guideline transaction method. The discounted cash flow method computes the discounted
value of both projected annual cash flows and an assumed terminal value. The guideline company and
guideline transaction methods use publicly available information on selected peer banks and recent
sales of controlling interests in comparable banks to estimate the fair value of the Company. This
process allows the Company to determine an appropriate implied control premium which serves to
adjust the Companys market capitalization to an estimated fair value utilized in connection with
the Companys annual goodwill impairment evaluation. The Company used the discounted cash flow
method under the income approach weighted at 50%, the guideline public company method weighted at
30% and the guideline transaction method weighted at 20%. The weightings were determined by
professional judgment based upon the relative strengths of each of the three methods as it relates
to the quality and quantity of available and verifiable information.
Management worked closely with the third party valuation specialist throughout the valuation
process. Management provided necessary information to this third party and reviewed the
methodologies and assumptions used including loan and deposit growth, regulatory capital
requirements and the Companys business strategy.
A reconciliation was performed of the fair value estimate to the Companys publicly traded
market capitalization using the thirty day average closing prices of its common and preferred stock
through the valuation date. The implied control premium derived by comparing the Companys market
capitalization to the Step 1 fair value estimate was determined to be within a reasonable range of
actual control premiums observed in recently completed transactions in an industry peer group. The
results of this reconciliation supported the reasonableness of the fair value estimate used in the
goodwill impairment test.
49
In Step 1
of the analysis, it was determined that the fair value estimate was less than the
carrying value of the single reporting unit. However, in Step 2 of the test it was determined that
the decline in the fair value was attributable to a decline in the fair values of the assets of the
single reporting unit and an increase in the fair values of liabilities, not to a decline in the
value of the goodwill. In general, as a result of the Step 2 analysis, management concluded the
decrease in the fair value is primarily attributable to prolonged weak economic conditions and the
impact these conditions have had on the fair value of the Companys loan portfolio and decreases in
market interest rates.. The decline in interest rates caused the increase in the fair value of
borrowings structured in previous periods when market interest rates were higher. These two factors
more than account for the drop in the Companys fair value, leaving goodwill unimpaired. A
discussion of the Step 2 test assumptions, methods and results is presented below.
In Step 2 of the test,
the Company estimated the fair value of assets and liabilities in the
same manner as if a purchase of the reporting unit was taking place from a market participant
perspective, which includes estimating the fair value of other intangibles. The fair value
estimation methodology selected for the Companys most significant assets and liabilities was based
on the Companys observations and knowledge of methodologies typically and currently utilized by
market participants, the structure and characteristics of the asset and liability in terms of cash
flows and collateral, and the availability and reliability of significant inputs required for a
selected methodology and comparative data to evaluate the outcomes. Specifically, the Company
selected the income approach for performing loans, retail certificates of deposit, core deposit
intangibles, and borrowings, and the market approach for branch properties. The Company estimated
fair values separately for nonaccrual loans and loans 60-89 days past due. The income approach was
deemed appropriate for the assets and liabilities noted above due to the limited current comparable
market transaction data available. The market approach was deemed appropriate for the branch
properties and foreclosed properties due to the nature of the underlying real and personal
property. In Step 2, the Company did not use multiple approaches to estimate the fair value of any
given asset or liability category; therefore, no weightings were incorporated into the Companys
methodology in this step.
Net loans were $2.4 billion
or 66.9% of Company assets as of September 30, 2009. The
estimated fair value of net loans was $86.8 million or 3.7% below book value. In computing this
estimated fair value, performing loans were separated into fixed and variable components, floors
and collateral coverage ratios were considered, and appropriate comparable market discount rates
were used to compute fair values using a discounted cash flow approach. A 40% discount was applied to
nonaccrual loans based upon recent Company charge-off experience and a 10% discount
was applied to loans 60-89 days past due and accruing.
The core deposit
intangible asset fair value was estimated by computing the expected future
cost savings from holding low cost deposits and resulted in a fair value estimate $12.3 million
above book value. Estimated fair value for the Companys branch facilities was $7.1 million above
book value based upon values determined from the most recent appraisals received adjusted for
estimated property value declines from appraisal dates to September 30, 2009.
The fair values
of the Companys liabilities were estimated using price estimates from a
nationally known dealer for 82% of borrowings, and discounted cash flows reflecting the effects of
credit spreads for the remaining borrowings and time and brokered deposits. The fair value estimate
for all liabilities was $41.3 million above book carrying value. Time and brokered deposits were
determined to have a net fair value $14.7 million over book carrying value and borrowings accounted
for the remaining $26.6 million.
Although Step 1 of the
impairment test showed the fair value of stockholders equity was $88.2
million below the book carrying value, thereby requiring Step 2 testing, the Step 2 results
indicated the estimated fair values of other assets and liabilities net were $113.0 million below
the book carrying amounts and therefore none of that decrease was attributable to the $78.6 million
of goodwill on the books as of at September 30, 2009.
Material assumptions used in the fair value estimate include projected earnings, projected
balance sheet and capital levels, effective tax rates, market discount rates, terminal residual
values, composition of market comparables and the weighting of computational method results in Step
1 testing. Changes in any of these assumptions can have a material effect on the fair value used
in the goodwill impairment evaluation. In particular, changes in projected earnings and market
bank stock levels have a material effect on the Step 1 estimated fair values. As a financial
institution, the fair value estimates in Step 2 are extremely sensitive to changes in market
interest rates and credit spreads, especially on the values of longer term fixed rate assets and
liabilities. As noted above, net loans represented 66.9% of total assets as of September 30, 2009.
Using the September 30, 2009 impairment study values, a 1% change in loan fair values up or down
due to market interest rates or changes in credit spreads would change the net loan fair value by
$23.7 million. Core deposit intangible fair values increase with increases in market interest
rates. The fair value of long term borrowings with fixed interest rates increases as market rates
decline and decreases as market rates increase.
The assumptions and methodologies used for annual goodwill impairment testing for September
30, 2009 as discussed above, were similar to those used in the prior year and the same third party
valuation specialist was used; however, since interest rates continued to decline, credit spreads
had widened and asset quality had materially changed, the evaluation of loan fair values was more
granular and involved segregating the loan balances into much finer groups for valuation purposes
including segregating 60-89 day past due loans and assigning a 10% discount rate on them.
In the fourth quarter of 2009 the Company will perform another goodwill impairment test if, in
its assessment, it determines any events have occurred or circumstances have changed (triggering events) during that quarter that would more likely than not reduce
the fair value of goodwill below the carrying amount.
50
Deposits and Borrowed Funds
The following table sets forth the composition of the Companys deposits as of the indicated
dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand
|
|
$
|
330,901
|
|
|
$
|
334,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
|
176,597
|
|
|
|
176,224
|
|
Money-market
|
|
|
206,653
|
|
|
|
208,484
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
134,539
|
|
|
|
129,101
|
|
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000
|
|
|
878,695
|
|
|
|
689,896
|
|
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more
|
|
|
403,149
|
|
|
|
435,687
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit
|
|
|
424,655
|
|
|
|
438,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,224,288
|
|
|
|
2,078,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,555,189
|
|
|
$
|
2,412,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits
(1)
|
|
$
|
848,690
|
|
|
$
|
848,304
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand, money market, and savings.
|
Total deposits of $2.6 billion at September 30, 2009 represented an increase of $142.4
million, or 5.9%, from December 31, 2008. Changes in the Companys deposits are noted below.
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits were $330.9 million at September 30, 2009, $3.6 million less
than the $334.5 million level at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits increased 7.0%, or $146.0 million to $2.2 billion at September
30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
Core deposits, which consist of noninterest-bearing demand, interest-bearing demand, money
market, and savings, increased slightly to $848.7 million at September 30, 2009 from
$848.3 million at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit under $100,000 increased $188.8 million, or 27.4%, from December
31, 2008 to $878.7 million at September 30, 2009, as a result of successful promotions which
allowed the Company to build liquidity.
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit over $100,000 decreased by $32.5 million from December 31, 2008 to
$403.1 million at September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
Certificates of deposits through the CDARS and Internet
networks were $139.0 million at
September 30, 2009 compared to $41.6 million at December 31, 2008. These networks allow the
Company to access other deposit funding sources.
|
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit decreased $14.2 million, or 3.2%, to $424.7 million at
September 30, 2009 compared to year end 2008. The brokered certificates of deposit are
comprised of underlying certificates of deposits in denominations of less than $100,000.
|
The Company continues to participate in the FDICs Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. This
program consists of two components. The first is the Transaction Account Guarantee Program where
all
51
noninterest-bearing transaction deposit accounts, including all personal and business checking
deposit accounts, and NOW accounts, which are capped at a rate no higher than 0.50%, are fully
guaranteed, through June 30, 2010, regardless of dollar amount. All other deposit accounts continue
to be covered by the FDICs expanded deposit insurance limit of $250,000 through December 31, 2013. The second component
is the Debt Guarantee Program, which guarantees newly issued senior unsecured debt. The Company has
not issued any such debt and currently does not plan to issue, any such debt.
In 2009, the FDIC increased premium assessments to maintain adequate funding of the Deposit
Insurance Fund. Assessment rates set by the FDIC, effective March 1, 2009, generally range from 12
to 45 basis points; however, these rates may be adjusted upward or downward if the institution has
unsecured debt or secured liabilities. As a result, assessment rates for institutions may range
from 7 basis points to 77.5 basis points. These increases in premium assessments increased the
Companys expenses.
On May 22, 2009, the FDIC board agreed to impose an emergency special assessment of 5 basis
points on all banks (based on June 30, 2009 assets) to restore the Deposit Insurance Fund to an
acceptable level. The assessment, which was paid on September 30, 2009, is in addition to the
increase in premiums discussed above. The cost of this emergency special assessment to the Company
was $1.7 million. The FDIC also has publicly stated that at least one additional special assessment
for 2009 is probable. On September 29, 2009, the FDIC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that,
if adopted, would require FDIC-insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based
assessments for the fourth quarter 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012, but would supplant the
proposed additional special assessment for 2009. The Company expects its FDIC insurance expense
to increase by approximately $600,000 quarterly starting in the fourth quarter of 2009.
The Company competes for core deposits in the highly competitive Chicago Metropolitan
Statistical Area. Competitive pricing has made it difficult to maintain and grow these types of
deposits. The level of competition for core deposits is not expected to ease in the near term. The
Companys recent campaigns include certificates of deposit promotions and core product promotions.
The Company continues to pursue on-line account opening process to facilitate the growth of core
deposit relationships.
Borrowed funds are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
$
|
8,600
|
|
|
$
|
8,600
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
777,078
|
|
|
$
|
817,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company utilizes securities sold under repurchase agreements as a source of funds that do
not increase the Companys reserve requirements. The Company had $297.7 million in securities sold
under repurchase agreements at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. These repurchase
agreements are with primary dealers and have fixed rates ranging from 2.76% to 4.65% and maturities
of approximately eight to nine years with call provisions ranging from three months to one year.
The Company has collateralized the repurchase agreements with various securities totaling $365.6
million at September 30, 2009.
In addition, the repurchase agreements with one of the repurchase agreement counterparties
permit that counterparty to terminate the repurchase agreements if the Bank does not maintain its
well-capitalized status. At September 30, 2009, the repurchase agreements with those provisions
totaled $262.7 million with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.76% to 4.65%, maturities ranging
from approximately 7.5 to 8.5 years, and call provisions (at the counterpartys option) ranging
from three months to one year. Due to the relatively high fixed rates on
52
these borrowings as
compared to currently low market rates of interest, the Bank would incur substantial costs to
unwind these repurchase agreements if terminated prior to their maturities. Accordingly, if the
Bank does not maintain its well-capitalized status and the counterparty exercises its option to
terminate one or more of these repurchase agreements prior to maturity, the associated unwind costs
could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
The Bank is a member of the FHLB. At September 30, 2009, total FHLB advances were $340.0
million compared to $380.0 million at year end. Such advances have fixed rates ranging from 2.45%
to 4.47% and maturities ranging from approximately eight to nine years and various call provisions
ranging from three months to two years. The Company has collateralized the advances with various
securities totaling $115.0 million and first mortgage and home equity loans totaling $237.5 million
at September 30, 2009.
Revolving and Term Loan Facilities; Events of Default
The Companys credit agreements with a correspondent bank at September 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008 consisted of a revolving line of credit, a term note, and a subordinated debenture in the
amounts of $8.6 million, $55.0 million, and $15.0 million, respectively.
The revolving line of credit had a maximum availability of $8.6 million, an outstanding
balance of $8.6 million as of September 30, 2009, an interest rate at September 30, 2009 of
one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis points with an interest rate floor of 7.25%, and matured on July 3,
2009. The term note had an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis points at September 30,
2009 and matures on September 28, 2010. The subordinated debt had an interest rate of one-month
LIBOR plus 350 basis points at September 30, 2009, matures on March 31, 2018, and qualifies as Tier
2 capital.
The revolving line of credit and term note included the following financial covenants at
September 30, 2009: (1) the Bank must not have nonperforming loans (loans on nonaccrual status and
90 days or more past due and troubled-debt restructured loans) in excess of 3.00% of total loans,
(2) the Bank must report a quarterly profit, excluding charges related to acquisitions, and (3) the
Bank must remain well capitalized. At September 30, 2009, the Company was in violation of financial covenants (the Financial Covenant Defaults).
The Company did not make a required $5.0 million principal payment on the term note due on
July 1, 2009 under the covenant waiver for the third quarter of 2008. On July 8, 2009, the lender
advised the Company that such non-compliance constitutes a continuing event of default under the
loan agreements (the Contingent Waiver Default). The Companys decision not to make the $5.0
million principal payment, together with its previously announced decision to suspend the dividend
on its Series A preferred stock and defer the dividends on its Series T preferred stock and
interest payments on its trust preferred securities, were made in order to retain cash and preserve
liquidity and capital at the holding company.
The revolving line of credit matured on July 3, 2009, and the Company did not pay to the
lender all of the aggregate outstanding principal on the revolving line of credit on such date. The
failure to make such payment constitutes an additional event of default under the credit agreements
(the Payment Default; the Contingent Wavier Default, the Financial Covenant Defaults and the
Payment Default are hereinafter collectively referred to as the Existing Events of Default).
As a result of the occurrence and the continuance of the Existing Events of Default, the
lender notified the Company that, as of July 8, 2009, the interest rate on the revolving line of
credit increased to the default interest rate of 7.25%, and the interest rate under the term note
agreement increased to the default interest rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 455 basis points. The Company
also did not make a required $5.0 million principal payment on the term note due on October 1, 2009
under the covenant waiver for the third quarter of 2008.
53
As a result, and as a result of the other Existing Events of Default, the lender possesses
certain rights and remedies, including the ability to demand immediate payment of amounts due
totaling $63.6 million plus accrued interest or foreclose on the collateral supporting the credit
agreements, being 100% of the stock of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank.
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement (Forbearance
Agreement) with its lender that provides for a forbearance
period through March 31, 2010, during which time the Company will continue to
pursue completion of its previously disclosed capital plan. Management believes that the
Forbearance Agreement provides the Company sufficient time to complete all major elements of the
capital plan; however there can be no assurance that any or all major elements of the capital plan
will be completed in a timely manner or at all. During the forbearance period, the Company is not
obligated to make interest and principal payments in excess of funds held in a deposit security
account (which will be funded with $325,000), and while retaining all rights and remedies
within the credit agreements, the lender has agreed not to demand payment of amounts due or begin
foreclosure proceedings in respect of the collateral (which consists
primarily of all the stock of the Bank), and has agreed to forbear from exercising the
rights and remedies available to it in respect of existing defaults and future compliance with
certain covenants through March 31, 2010. As part of the Forbearance Agreement, the Company entered
into a tax refund security agreement under which it agreed to deliver
to the lender the expected proceeds
to be received in connection with an outstanding Federal income tax refund in the approximate amount of
$2.1 million. These proceeds, when received, will be placed in the deposit security account, and
will be available for interest and principal payments. The Forbearance Agreement may terminate
prior to March 31, 2010 if the Company defaults under any of its representations, warranties or
obligations contained in either the Forbearance Agreement or credit agreements (other than with
respect to certain financial and regulatory covenants), or the Bank becomes subject to receivership
by the FDIC or the Company becomes subject to other bankruptcy or insolvency type proceeding.
Upon the expiration of the forbearance period, the principal and interest payments that were
due under the revolving line of credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers, at
the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into will once again become due and payable, along
with such other amounts as may have become due during the forbearance period. Absent successful
completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would
not be able to meet any demands for payment of amounts then due at the expiration of the
forbearance period. If the Company is unable to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources
of financing on acceptable terms, it may have a material adverse effect on the Companys business
and results of operations.
Capital Resources
Stockholders equity decreased $125.6 million from December 31, 2008 to $180.2 million at
September 30, 2009, largely due to the $123.1 million net loss for the nine months ended September
30, 2009. Total capital to average risk-weighted assets decreased to 7.95% at September 30, 2009
from 10.07% at December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of the decrease in Tier 1 capital. The
Banks total capital to average risk-weighted assets decreased to 10.17% at September 30, 2009 from
10.54% at December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of the decrease in Tier 1 capital.
The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by
federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action regulations
involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated
under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to
qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors, and the
regulators can lower classifications in certain areas. Failure to meet regulatory capital
requirements could prompt regulatory action that could have a direct material adverse effect on the
financial statements.
54
The prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications for banks, including
well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and
critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial
condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is not required to accept brokered
deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and plans for capital restoration
are required.
The Company was undercapitalized and the Bank was categorized as well capitalized as of September 30, 2009.
The risk-based capital information for the Company is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
2,502,626
|
|
|
$
|
2,878,087
|
|
Average assets
|
|
|
3,650,053
|
|
|
|
3,590,313
|
|
Capital components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
180,239
|
|
|
$
|
305,834
|
|
Plus: Guaranteed trust preferred securities
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
Less: Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
|
|
(14,683
|
)
|
Less: Goodwill
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
Less: Disallowed tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,748
|
)
|
Less: SERP prior service cost and decrease in projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Unrealized (gains) losses on securities, net of tax
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
Plus: Unrealized losses on equity securities, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital
|
|
|
151,445
|
|
|
|
238,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
83,506
|
|
|
|
44,432
|
|
Reserve for unfunded commitments
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
Disallowed allowance
|
|
|
(53,644
|
)
|
|
|
(9,406
|
)
|
Qualifying subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Unrealized gains on equity securities, net of tax
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
198,903
|
|
|
$
|
289,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital levels and minimum required levels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required
|
|
Minimum Required
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
for Capital Adequacy
|
|
to be Well Capitalized
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
Company
|
|
$
|
198,903
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
%
|
|
$
|
200,210
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
253,635
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
|
199,432
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
249,291
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets
Company
|
|
|
151,445
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
100,105
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
221,297
|
|
|
|
8.88
|
|
|
|
99,716
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
149,574
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I common capital to risk-weighted assets
Company
|
|
|
(30,991
|
)
|
|
|
(1.24
|
)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
221,297
|
|
|
|
8.88
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to average assets
Company
|
|
|
151,445
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
146,002
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
221,297
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
145,642
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
182,053
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required
|
|
Minimum Required
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
for Capital Adequacy
|
|
to be Well Capitalized
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
Company
|
|
$
|
289,967
|
|
|
|
10.07
|
%
|
|
$
|
230,247
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
301,993
|
|
|
|
10.54
|
|
|
|
229,244
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
286,555
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets
Company
|
|
|
238,873
|
|
|
|
8.30
|
|
|
|
115,123
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
236,054
|
|
|
|
8.24
|
|
|
|
114,622
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
171,933
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I common capital to risk-weighted assets
Company
|
|
|
57,125
|
|
|
|
1.98
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
236,054
|
|
|
|
8.24
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to average assets
Company
|
|
|
238,873
|
|
|
|
6.65
|
|
|
|
143,613
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
236,054
|
|
|
|
6.60
|
|
|
|
143,000
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
178,750
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
On July 28, 2009, the Company announced that it had developed a detailed capital plan and
timeline for execution. The capital plan was adopted in order to, among other things, improve the
Companys common equity capital and raise additional capital to enable it to better withstand and
respond to adverse market conditions. Management has completed, or is in the process of completing,
a number of steps as part of the Capital Plan, including cost reduction initiatives, broadened
investment banking support to assist with the Capital Plan, undertaking an offer to exchange the
Companys Series A Depositary Shares for common stock, negotiations to restructure the senior and
subordinated debt, and possible capital raising activities. See Recent Developments for more
details.
The Company believes the successful completion of its Capital Plan would substantially improve
its capital position; however, no assurances can be made that the Company will be able to
successfully complete all, or any portion of its Capital Plan, or that the Capital Plan will not be
materially modified in the future. The Companys decision to implement its Capital Plan reflects
the adverse effect that the severe downturn in the commercial and residential real estate markets
has had on the Companys financial condition and capital base, as well as its assessment of current
regulatory expectations of adequate levels of common equity capital. If the Company is not able to
successfully complete a substantial portion of its Capital Plan, the Company expects that its
business, and the value of its securities, will be materially and adversely affected, and it will
be more difficult for the Company to meet the capital requirements expected of it by its primary
banking regulators.
The Banks primary regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Illinois Department
of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, have recently completed a safety and
soundness examination of the Bank. As a result of that examination, the Company expects that the
Federal Reserve Bank and the Division of Banking will request that the Bank enter into a formal
supervisory action requiring it to take certain steps intended to improve its overall condition.
Such a supervisory action could require the Bank, among other things, to: implement the capital
restoration plan described above to strengthen the Banks capital position; develop a plan to
improve the quality of the Banks loan portfolio by charging off loans and reducing its position in
assets classified as substandard; develop and implement a plan to enhance the Banks liquidity
position; and enhance the Banks loan underwriting and workout remediation teams. The final
supervisory action may contain other conditions and targeted time frames as specified by the
regulators.
56
The Company believes that the successful completion of all or a significant portion of the
Capital Plan will enable the Bank to meet the requirements of any formal supervisory action with
the regulators and will ensure that the Bank is able to comply with applicable bank regulations.
However, the successful completion of all or any portion of the capital plan is not assured and if
the Company or the Bank is unable to comply with the terms of the anticipated supervisory action or
any other applicable regulations, the Company and the Bank could become subject to additional,
heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our regulators were to take such additional actions,
the Company and the Bank could become subject to various requirements limiting the ability to
develop new business lines, mandating additional capital, and/or requiring the sale of certain
assets and liabilities. Failure of the Company to meet these conditions could lead to further
enforcement action on behalf of the regulators. The terms of any such additional regulatory
actions, orders or agreements could have a materially adverse effect on the business of the Bank
and the Company.
Liquidity
The Company manages its liquidity position of the Bank with the objective of maintaining
access to sufficient funds to respond to the needs of depositors and borrowers and to take
advantage of earnings enhancement opportunities. At September 30, 2009, the Company had cash and
cash equivalents of $327.4 million. The Bank expanded its liquidity during 2009. Liquid assets,
including cash held at the Federal Reserve Bank and unencumbered securities, improved from the
second quarter of 2009 by $86.5 million during the third quarter of 2009 to $324.6 million compared
to $36.1 million at December 31, 2008.
In addition to the normal cash flows from its securities portfolio, and repayments and
maturities of loans and securities, the Bank utilizes other short-term, intermediate-term and
long-term funding sources such as securities sold under agreements to repurchase and overnight
funds purchased from correspondent banks.
The FHLB provides an additional source of liquidity which has been used by the Bank since
1999. The Bank also has various funding arrangements with commercial and investment banks in the
form of Federal funds lines, repurchase agreements, and internet-based and brokered certificate of
deposit programs. The Bank maintains these funding arrangements to achieve favorable costs of
funds, manage interest rate risk, and enhance liquidity in the event of deposit withdrawals. The
FHLB advances and repurchase agreements are subject to the availability of collateral. The Bank has
collateralized the FHLB advances with various securities totaling $115.0 million and first mortgage
and home equity loans totaling $237.5 million and the repurchase agreements with various securities
totaling $365.6 million at September 30, 2009. The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity to
meet its current and future near-term liquidity needs; however, no assurances can be made that the
Companys liquidity position will not be materially, adversely affected in the future. See Risk
Factors We may not be able to access sufficient and cost-effective sources of liquidity
necessary to fund our operations and meet our payment obligations under our existing funding
commitments, including the repayment of our brokered deposits.
The Company monitors and manages its liquidity position on several levels, which include
estimated loan funding requirements, estimated loan payoffs, securities portfolio maturities or
calls, and anticipated depository buildups or runoffs.
Certain available-for-sale securities were temporarily impaired at September 30, 2009,
primarily due to changes in interest rates as well as current economic conditions that appear to be
cyclical in nature. The Company does not intend to sell nor would it be required to sell the
temporarily impaired securities before recovering their amortized cost. See Note 5 Securities to
the unaudited consolidated financial statements for more details. The Companys liquidity position
is further enhanced by monthly principal and interest payments received from a majority of the loan
portfolio.
The Company continues to seek opportunities to diversify the customer base, enhance the
product suite, and improve the overall liquidity position. The Company has developed analytical
tools to help support the
57
overall liquidity forecasting and contingency planning. In addition, the
Company has developed a more efficient collateral management process which has strengthened the
Banks liquidity.
The Company announced on May 6, 2009, that the board of directors made the decision to suspend
the dividend on the $43.1 million of Series A noncumulative redeemable convertible perpetual
preferred stock; defer the dividend on the $84.8 million of Series T preferred stock; and take
steps to defer interest payments on $60.8 million of its junior subordinated debentures as
permitted by the terms of such debentures. Since the May 6th announcement, the Company has begun to
defer interest on its junior subordinated debentures. The accrued interest payable on junior
subordinated debentures was $1.1 million through September 30, 2009. The Company has no current
plans to resume dividend payments in respect of the Series A preferred stock or the Series T
preferred stock or interest payments in respect of its junior subordinated debentures.
The Companys holding companys liquidity position is affected by the amount of cash and other
liquid assets on hand, payment of interest and dividends on debt and equity instruments issued by
the holding company (all of which have been recently suspended or deferred), capital it injects
into the Bank, any redemption of debt for cash issued by the holding company, proceeds it raises
through the issuance of debt and/or equity instruments through the holding company, if any, and
dividends received from the Bank. The Companys future liquidity position may be adversely affected
if one or a combination of the following events occurs: the Bank continues to experience net losses
and, accordingly, is unable or prohibited by the Companys regulators to pay a dividend to the
holding company sufficient to satisfy our holding companys cash flow needs, the Company deems it
advisable or is required by the Federal Reserve to use cash at the holding company to support the
capital position of the Bank, the Bank fails to remain well-capitalized and, accordingly, the
regulators require the Bank to obtain prior approval to renew its existing brokered deposits or
originate additional brokered deposits, the Bank is required to provide additional collateral
against its FHLB borrowings and is unable to do so, or the Company has difficulty raising cash at the
holding company level through the issuance of debt or equity instruments or accessing additional
sources of credit.
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement with the lender under
its revolving and term loan facilities, pursuant to which, among other things, the lender agreed to
forbear from exercising the rights and remedies available to it as a consequence of certain
continuing events of default, except for continuing to impose default rates of interest. The
forbearance is effective for the period beginning July 3, 2009 until March 31, 2010, or earlier if,
among other things, the Company breaches representations and warranties contained in the
forbearance agreement, or the Company defaults on certain obligations under the forbearance
agreement or credit agreements (other than with respect to certain financial and regulatory
covenants) or the Bank becomes subject to receivership by the FDIC or the Company becomes subject
to other bankruptcy or insolvency type proceedings.
Upon the expiration of the forbearance period, the principal and interest payments that were
due under the revolving line of credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers, at
the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into will once again become due and payable, along
with such other amounts as may have become due during the forbearance period. Absent successful
completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would
not be able to meet any demands for payment of amounts then due at the expiration of the
forbearance period. If the Company is unable to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources
of financing on acceptable terms, it may have a material adverse effect on the Companys business
and results of operations.
58
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis
The Company performs a net interest income analysis as part of its asset/liability management
practices. Net interest income analysis measures the change in net interest income in the event of
hypothetical parallel shifts in interest rates. This analysis assesses the risk of change in net
interest income in the event of sudden and sustained 1.0% and 2.0% increases in market interest
rates. The table below presents the Companys projected changes in net interest income for the
various rate shock levels at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. As result of
current market conditions, 1.0% and 2.0% decreases in market interest rates are not applicable for
either time period as those decreases would result in some interest rate assumptions falling below
zero. Nonetheless, the Companys net interest income could decline in those scenarios as yields on
earning assets could continue to adjust downward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Interest Income Over One Year Horizon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guideline
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
%
|
|
Dollar
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
+200 bp
|
|
$
|
16,631
|
|
|
|
26.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,274
|
|
|
|
8.23
|
%
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)%
|
+100 bp
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
|
|
12.20
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
-100 bp
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
-200 bp
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
As shown above, at September 30, 2009, the effect of an immediate 200 basis point increase in
interest rates would increase the Companys net interest income by 26.04%, or $16.6 million.
Overall net interest income sensitivity remains within the Companys and recommended regulatory
guidelines.
In a rising rate environment, yields on floating rate loans and investment securities are
expected to re-price upwards more quickly than the cost of funds. Due to a portion of the Banks
variable-rate loans being at rate floors, yields on variable-rate loans are not expected to adjust
upwards as quickly or the full extent as market interest rates.
PAGE 59
ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 240.13a-15(e)). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of September 30, 2009 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the
Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures and is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PAGE 60
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES
LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. The Company and its representatives may, from time to time, make written or oral
statements that are forward-looking and provide information other than historical information,
including statements contained in this Form 10-Q, the Companys other reports and documents filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in communications to its stockholders. These
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual
results to be materially different from any results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statement. These factors include, among
other things, the factors listed below.
In some cases, the Company has identified forward-looking statements by such words or phrases
as will likely result, is confident that, expects, should, could, may, will continue
to, believes, anticipates, predicts, forecasts, estimates, projects, potential,
intends, or similar expressions identifying forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including the negative of those words and
phrases. These forward-looking statements are based on managements current views and assumptions
regarding future events, future business conditions, and the outlook for the Company based on
currently available information. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or
implied by, these statements. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any such
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995, the Company is hereby identifying important factors that could affect the Companys
financial performance and could cause the Companys actual results for future periods to differ
materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any
forward-looking statements.
Among the factors that could have an impact on the Companys ability to achieve the plans,
goals, and future events and conditions expressed or implied in forward-looking statements are:
|
|
Managements ability to effectively manage interest rate risk and the impact of interest
rates in general on the volatility of the Companys net interest income;
|
|
|
Risks and uncertainties related to the contemplated Exchange Offer and to the Capital Plan,
including
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to successfully execute the Exchange Offer, including securing
the exchange of a significant number of Depositary Shares;
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to successfully implement and achieve the other goals of the
Capital Plan, the success of which is dependent on a successful Exchange Offer; and
|
whether the Company will need to materially modify its Capital Plan in the future;
|
|
the effect of the recently enacted Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the implementation by the Department of the
U.S. Treasury (the U.S. Treasury) and federal banking regulators of a number of programs to
address capital and liquidity issues in the banking system and additional programs that will
apply to us in the future, all of which may have significant effects on us and the financial
services industry;
|
PAGE 61
|
|
The possibility that the Companys wholesale funding sources may prove insufficient to
replace deposits at maturity and support potential growth;
|
|
|
Inaccessibility of funding sources on the same terms on which the Company has historically
relied if it is unable to maintain its current capital ratings;
|
|
|
The decline in commercial and residential real estate sales volume and the likely potential
for continuing illiquidity in the real estate market, including within the Chicago
metropolitan area;
|
|
|
The risks associated with the high concentration of commercial real estate loans in the
Companys portfolio;
|
|
|
The uncertainties in estimating the fair value of developed real estate and undeveloped
land in light of declining demand for such assets and continuing illiquidity in the real
estate market;
|
|
|
Uncertainties with respect to the future utilization of the Companys deferred tax assets;
|
|
|
Negative developments and disruptions in the credit and lending markets, including the
impact of the ongoing credit crisis on the Companys business and on the businesses of its
customers as well as other banks and lending institutions with which the Company has
commercial relationships;
|
|
|
A continuation of the recent unprecedented volatility in the capital markets;
|
|
|
The risks associated with implementing the Companys business strategy, including its
ability to preserve and access sufficient capital to execute on its strategy;
|
|
|
Rising unemployment and its impact on the Companys customers savings rates and their
ability to service debt obligations;
|
|
|
Fluctuations in the value of the Companys investment securities;
|
|
|
The ability to attract and retain senior management experienced in banking and financial
services;
|
|
|
Credit risks and risks from concentrations (by geographic area and by industry) within the
Banks loan portfolio and individual large loans;
|
|
|
The sufficiency of the allowance for loan losses to absorb the amount of actual losses
inherent in the existing portfolio of loans;
|
|
|
The failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of the allowance for loan losses
and estimation of values of collateral or cash flow projections and various financial assets
and liabilities;
|
|
|
The Companys ability to adapt successfully to technological changes to compete effectively
in the marketplace;
|
|
|
The effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms,
consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies,
money market and other mutual funds, and other financial institutions operating in the
Companys market or elsewhere or providing similar services;
|
|
|
Volatility of rate sensitive deposits;
|
PAGE 62
|
|
Operational risks, including data processing system failures or fraud;
|
|
|
|
Liquidity risks;
|
|
|
|
The ability to successfully acquire low cost deposits or funding;
|
|
|
|
Changes in the economic environment, competition, or other factors that may influence loan
demand, deposit flows, and the quality of the loan portfolio and loan and deposit pricing;
|
|
|
|
The impact from liabilities arising from legal or administrative proceedings on the
financial condition of the Company;
|
|
|
|
The ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company;
|
|
|
|
The Companys ability to pay cash dividends on its common and preferred stock and interest
on its junior subordinated debentures;
|
|
|
|
The Companys ability to restructure payments or comply with the terms of the forbearance
agreement;
|
|
|
|
Possible administrative or enforcement actions of banking regulators in connection with any
material failure of the Company or the Bank to comply with banking laws, rules or
regulations, or terms of the expected enforcement action;
|
|
|
|
Possible administrative or enforcement actions of the SEC in connection with the SEC
inquiry of the restatement of the Companys September 30, 2002 financial statements;
|
|
|
|
Governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative and regulatory changes,
that may result in the imposition of costs and constraints on the Company through higher FDIC
insurance premiums, significant fluctuations in market interest rates, increases in capital
requirements, and operational limitations;
|
|
|
|
Changes in general economic or industry conditions, nationally or in the communities in
which the Company conducts business;
|
|
|
|
Changes in legislation or regulatory and accounting principles, policies, or guidelines
affecting the business conducted by the Company;
|
|
|
|
The impact of possible future goodwill and other material impairment charges;
|
|
|
|
The effects of increased deposit insurance premiums;
|
|
|
|
The Banks ability to comply with the terms of an
agreement with its regulators (which
the Company anticipates entering into shortly) pursuant to which the
Bank will agree to
take certain corrective actions to improve its financial condition;
|
|
|
|
The ability of the Banks repurchase agreement counterparties to
terminate the repurchase agreements if the Bank does not maintain its well-capitalized status
and the substantial costs the Bank would incur to unwind these repurchase agreements prior to
their maturies;
|
|
|
|
The Companys ability absent successful completion of
all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan to repay the funds
due at the
|
PAGE 63
|
|
expiration of the forbearance period;
|
|
|
The delisting of the Companys common stock from Nasdaq;
|
|
|
|
Acts of war or terrorism; and
|
|
|
|
Other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technical factors affecting the
Companys operations, products, services, and prices.
|
The Company wishes to caution that the foregoing list of important factors may not be
all-inclusive and specifically declines to undertake any obligation to publicly revise any
forward-looking statements that have been made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of
such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
With respect to forward-looking statements set forth in the notes to consolidated financial
statements, including those relating to contingent liabilities and legal proceedings, some of the
factors that could affect the ultimate disposition of those contingencies are changes in applicable
laws, the development of facts in individual cases, settlement opportunities, and the actions of
plaintiffs, judges, and juries.
PAGE 64
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiaries are a
party other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their respective business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Company has updated, as set forth below, the descriptions of certain risks and
uncertainties that could affect the Companys business, future performance or financial condition
originally included in Part I, Item 1A of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008. Additionally, as a result of the adoption of the Capital Plan, the Company has
identified certain other risks and uncertainties related to its Capital Plan. These risk factors
could materially adversely affect the Companys business, financial condition, future results or
trading price of the Companys common stock. In addition to the other information contained in the
reports the Company files with the SEC, investors should consider these risk factors prior to
making an investment decision with respect to the Companys securities. The risks described in the
risk factors below, however, are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known to the Company or those that are currently considered to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Companys business, financial condition and/or
operating results.
Risks Related to Our Contemplated Exchange Offer and to Our Capital Plan
The Exchange Offer and other aspects of our Capital Plan will result in a substantial amount of our
common stock entering the market, which could adversely affect the market price of our Common
Stock.
As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately 28,116,312 million shares of common stock
outstanding. As part of our contemplated Exchange Offer, we recently filed a registration statement
that seeks to register up to 15,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued in the Exchange Offer.
Although the exact number of shares of common stock that may be issued is not yet determinable and
will be based on a number of factors, if the Exchange Offer is consummated and participation in the
Exchange Offer is high, a substantial number of shares of common stock is expected to be issued. In
addition, assuming stockholder approval of the increase in our authorized shares of common stock
from 64,000,000 to 4,000,000,000, we may issue a substantial number of additional shares of common
stock and other equity securities pursuant to our Capital Plan, including to the U.S. Treasury. The
issuance of such a large number of shares of our common stock could adversely affect the market
price of our common stock. See also Risks Related to the Implementation of Our Capital Plan We
contemplate issuing a significant amount of common stock to accomplish the goals of our Capital
Plan. The issuance of even a portion of the additional Common Stock contemplated under our Capital
Plan will be dilutive, potentially significantly, to holders of our common stock.
The market price of our Common Stock may be subject to continued significant fluctuations and
volatility.
The stock markets have recently experienced high levels of volatility. These market
fluctuations have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, the trading price of
our common stock. In addition, the market price of our common stock has been subject to significant
fluctuations and volatility and may continue to fluctuate or further decline. Factors that could
cause fluctuations, volatility or further decline in the market price of our common stock, many of
which could be beyond our control, include, among other things:
|
|
changes or perceived changes in the condition, operations, results or prospects of our
businesses and market assessments of these changes or perceived changes;
|
PAGE 65
|
|
announcements relating to significant corporate transactions, including the Exchange Offer
and other possible transactions contemplated by our Capital Plan;
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or proposals, or new governmental regulations or
proposals, affecting us, including those relating to the current financial crisis and global
economic downturn;
|
|
|
|
the continued decline, failure to stabilize or lack of improvement in general market and
economic conditions, including real estate and credit markets;
|
|
|
|
market assessments concerning the continued listing of our Common Stock on NASDAQ;
|
|
|
|
the departure of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
operating and stock price performance of companies that investors deem comparable to us; and
|
|
|
|
market assessments of the Exchange Offer, including as to whether and when the Exchange
Offer will take place.
|
Future dividend payments and Common Stock repurchases are restricted by the terms of the U.S.
Treasurys current equity investment in the Company as well as the terms of the Companys
outstanding Series A Preferred Stock and trust preferred securities .
Under the terms of the Companys agreement with the U.S. Treasury, for so long as any Series T
Preferred Stock remains outstanding, the Company is prohibited from paying dividends on its common
stock, and from making certain repurchases of equity securities, including its common stock,
without the U.S. Treasurys consent until the third anniversary of the U.S. Treasurys investment
or until the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of the Series T Preferred Stock to third parties.
Furthermore, as long as the Series T Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury is outstanding,
dividend payments and repurchases or redemptions relating to certain equity securities, including
its common stock, are prohibited until all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on such preferred
stock, subject to certain limited exceptions. In the event that Midwest is approved for
participation in the CAP and uses CAP proceeds to redeem the Series T Preferred Stock, the dividend
and repurchase restrictions under the CAP will be applicable to Midwest. The CAP dividend
restrictions provide that for so long as the U.S. Treasury owns preferred stock or Common Stock of
Midwest that it acquired under the CAP, the maximum quarterly dividend that Midwest will be
permitted to pay on its common stock will be $0.01 per share. In addition, Midwest will not be
permitted to pay dividends on common stock or any other junior preferred stock or
pari passu
preferred stock unless all accrued and unpaid dividends on the CAP preferred stock have been paid.
The CAP repurchase restrictions provide that for so long as the U.S. Treasury owns preferred stock
or Common Stock of Midwest that it acquired under the CAP, Midwest may not repurchase any equity
securities or trust preferred securities without the prior consent of the U.S. Treasury.
In addition, (i) our Certificate of Incorporation currently requires us to pay dividends on
our Series A Preferred Stock and on our Series T Preferred Stock before we pay any dividends on our
Common Stock and (ii) under the terms of our junior subordinated debentures of the Company, we can
not declare or pay any dividends on our Common Stock or preferred stock if we have delayed interest
payments on the trust preferred securities issued under the related indenture. During the second
quarter of 2009, the Company suspended the payment of dividends on its outstanding Series A
Preferred Stock, and Series T Preferred Stock and began deferring interest on its trust preferred
securities. Accordingly, we will not pay dividends on our Common Stock to the extent we have not
resumed paying dividends on any outstanding shares of Series T Preferred Stock, including all
cumulative unpaid dividends, or Series A Preferred Stock and until we begin paying interest on our
trust preferred securities and repaying all of the unpaid but accrued interest on such securities.
PAGE 66
We may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the Exchange Offer.
A principal goal of the Exchange Offer is to increase our Tangible Common equity (TCE) and
Tier 1 Common. A view has recently developed that TCE and Tier 1 Common are important metrics for
analyzing a banking organizations financial condition and capital strength. We believe that
increasing our TCE and Tier 1 Common will reduce our expenses associated with preferred stock
dividends, enhance our standing with our regulators and improve market and public perception of our
financial strength. However, given the relatively recent emergence of TCE and Tier 1 Common as
important metrics for analyzing the financial condition and capital strength of a banking
organization, and the rapidly changing and uncertain financial environment, there can be no
assurance that we will achieve these objectives or that the benefits, if any, realized from the
Exchange Offer will be sufficient to restore market and public perception of our financial
strength.
In addition, if the Exchange Offer is not completed or is delayed we may be subject to the
following material risks:
|
|
the market price of our Common Stock may decline to the extent that the current market price
of our Common Stock reflects a market assumption that the Exchange Offer has been or will be
completed;
|
|
|
|
the market price of our Depositary Shares may decline to the extent that the current market
price of our Depositary Shares reflects a market assumption that the Exchange Offer has been or
will be completed; and
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to increase our TCE or Tier 1 Common and thus fail to increase a key
measure of financial strength as viewed by our regulators and the market.
|
We contemplate issuing a significant amount of Common Stock to accomplish the goals of our Capital
Plan. The issuance of even a portion of the additional Common Stock contemplated under our Capital
Plan will be dilutive, potentially significantly, to holders of our Common Stock.
Our Capital Plan contemplates various methods of issuing additional amounts of common equity
in order to improve our capital position, in addition to issuing shares as part of an Exchange
Offer, including:
|
|
seeking an investment by the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the CAP that would be used to
exchange our existing Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series T, with an aggregate
liquidation preference of $84,784,000 (the Series T Preferred Stock), which is currently held by
the U.S. Treasury, for another class of mandatory convertible preferred stock to be issued to the
U.S. Treasury under the CAP, and to thereafter convert this new class of preferred stock into
shares of Common Stock, subject to regulatory approval;
|
|
|
|
negotiating with our primary lender to restructure $55.0 million of senior debt and $15.0
million of subordinated debt; and
|
|
|
|
engaging in one or more private and/or public offerings of common and/or convertible
preferred stock.
|
Any one of the foregoing events, if affected, would further dilute holders of our Common
Stock.
In addition, in connection with purchasing the Series T Preferred Stock, the U.S. Treasury
received a warrant to purchase 4,282,020 shares of our Common Stock at an initial per share
exercise price of $2.97, subject to adjustment, which expires ten years from the issuance date.
Even if we were to redeem the Series T Preferred Stock, there is no assurance that this warrant
will be fully retired, and therefore that it will not be exercised, prior to its expiration date.
The issuance of additional Common Stock or common equivalent securities in future equity offerings,
to the U.S. Treasury or otherwise, or as a result of the exercise of the warrant the U.S. Treasury
holds will dilute the ownership interest of our existing common stockholders. In
PAGE 67
addition, the
terms of the warrant we issued to the U.S. Treasury under the CPP provides that, if we issue Common
Stock or securities convertible or exercisable into, or exchangeable for, Common Stock at a price
that is less than 90% of the market price of such shares on the last trading day preceding the date
of the agreement to sell such shares, the number and the per share price of Common Stock to be purchased
pursuant to the warrant will be adjusted pursuant to its terms.
There can be no assurances that we will not in the future determine that it is necessary or
advisable to issue additional shares of Common Stock, securities convertible into or exchangeable
for Common Stock or common equivalent securities to fund strategic initiatives or other business
needs or to build additional capital, whether as a result of a modification of our Capital Plan or
in addition to the actions contemplated by our Capital Plan. The market price of our Common Stock
could decline as a result of the Exchange Offer or any of the other exchanges or capital raising
activities contemplated by our Capital Plan, as well as other sales of Common Stock or similar
securities in the market thereafter, or the perception that such sales could occur. We may also
choose to issue securities convertible into or exercisable for our Common Stock and such securities
may contain anti-dilution provisions. Such anti-dilution adjustment provisions may have a further
dilutive effect on other holders of our Common Stock.
Exchanging our Series T Preferred Stock for mandatory convertible preferred shares under the CAP is
likely to impose additional restrictions on operations and could adversely affect liquidity.
If we are permitted to participate in and issue mandatory convertible preferred shares under
the CAP, we likely will be subject to additional conditions and limitations related to executive
compensation and corporate governance as well as new public reporting obligations. Many of our
competitors will not be subject to these restrictions and therefore may gain a competitive
advantage.
Furthermore, the CAP mandatory convertible preferred shares, if issued, would accrue
cumulative dividends at a rate of 9% per annum until their mandatory conversion to Common Stock
after seven years or prior redemption. This would represent an increase in dividend payments over
the current CPP rate of 5% per annum (for the first five years), which could adversely impact
liquidity, limit our ability to return capital to stockholders and have a material adverse effect
on us.
Exchanging our Series T Preferred Stock for mandatory convertible preferred shares under the
CAP, and then converting such shares to Common Stock would result in the U.S. government acquiring
a significant interest in us, which may have an adverse effect on operations and the market price
of our Common Stock. Likewise, the potential issuance of a significant amount of Common Stock or
equity convertible into our Common Stock to a private investor or group of private investors may
have the same effect.
Exchanging a large amount of our Series T Preferred Stock for mandatory convertible preferred
shares issued under the CAP, and then converting such shares to Common Stock will result in the
U.S. Treasury having the ability to exercise significant influence on matters submitted to
stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and certain transactions. The U.S.
Treasury has stated that it will issue a set of principles governing its exercise of voting rights
with respect to shares of our Common Stock that it may acquire. These principles have not yet been
issued. The U.S. Treasury may also transfer all, or a portion, of its shares to another person or
entity and, in the event of such a transfer, that person or entity could become a significant
stockholder of us. In addition, any issuance of a large amount of common equity or equity
convertible into common to a private investor or group of investors may pose similar risks.
Having a significant stockholder may make some future transactions more difficult or perhaps
impossible to complete without the support of such stockholder. The interests of the significant
stockholder may not coincide with our interests or the interests of other stockholders. There can
be no assurance that any significant stockholder will exercise its influence in our best interests
as opposed to its best interests as a
PAGE 68
significant stockholder. A significant stockholder may make
it difficult to approve certain transactions even if they are supported by the other stockholders,
which may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Common Stock. As noted above, the U.S.
Treasury has not yet issued guidelines outlining how it will exercise its voting rights if it
acquires shares of our Common Stock.
Issuing a significant amount of convertible preferred equity to the U.S. Treasury or issuing a
significant amount of common equity to a private investor may result in a change in control of us
under regulatory standards and contractual terms.
Our issuing a significant amount of convertible preferred equity of the U.S. Treasury or
obtaining a significant amount of additional capital any individual private investor could result
in a change of control for us under applicable regulatory standards and contractual terms. Such
change of control may trigger notice, approval and/or other regulatory requirements in many states
and jurisdictions in which we operate. A change in control also could limit our ability to utilize
net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards for tax purposes. We are also a party to various
contracts and other agreements that may require us to obtain consents from our respective contract
counterparties in the event of a change in control or require us to pay change-in-control payments
with respect to our officers and key employees (subject to U.S. Treasury restrictions as a result
of our participation in TARP or CAP). The failure to obtain any required regulatory consents or
approvals or contractual consents due to a change in control and/or any need to make substantial
payments under our employment agreements with our officers and key employees may have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Risks Related to Our Business, Operations and Industry
Our results of operations, financial condition and business may be materially, adversely affected
if we fail to successfully implement our Capital Plan.
Our Capital Plan contemplates a number of different strategies intended to reduce our costs,
increase our common equity capital and to enable us to withstand and better respond to adverse
market conditions. There can be no assurances, however, that we will be able to successfully
execute on each or every component of the Capital Plan, in a timely manner or at all, and a number
of events and conditions must occur in order for the plan to achieve its intended effect. For
instance, one of the key elements of our Capital Plan is to raise $100-$125 million in equity
capital. There can be no assurance, however, that private capital will be available to us on
acceptable terms or at all. In addition, we must obtain stockholder approval to allow us to
increase our authorized common stock and issue the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock
contemplated under our Capital Plan. Such stockholder approval, however, may not be obtained. If we
are not able to successfully complete our Capital Plan, we could be adversely impacted by negative
assessments regarding our ability to withstand continued adverse economic conditions. Moreover,
our business, and the value of our securities will be materially and adversely affected, and it
will be more difficult for us to meet the capital requirements expected of us by our primary
banking regulators. In addition, even if we succeed in executing on our Capital Plan, our
regulators could require us to change the amount or composition of our capital or impose other
directives relating to our business.
Our
regulators have recently completed a safety and soundness examination
of the Bank and we anticipate
that the Bank will enter into an agreement with our regulators shortly pursuant
to which we will agree to take certain corrective actions to improve our financial condition.
The Bank is subject to extensive supervision and regulation by federal and state bank
regulators. The Banks regulators conduct periodic safety and soundness examinations of the Bank to
ensure that the Bank meets applicable regulatory requirements. The Banks primary regulators, the
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Illinois Division of Banking, have recently completed a
safety and soundness examination of the Bank.
PAGE 69
Given the difficult economic conditions that are
negatively impacting the Bank as described above, the Company and the Bank anticipate that the
Federal Reserve Bank and the Division of Banking will request that the Bank enter into a written
agreement requiring it to take certain steps intended to improve its overall condition. Such an
agreement could require the Bank, among other things, to: implement the capital restoration plan
described above to strengthen the Banks capital position; develop a plan to improve the quality of
the Banks loan portfolio by charging off loans and reducing its position in assets classified as
substandard; develop and implement a plan to enhance the Banks liquidity position; and enhance
the Banks loan underwriting and workout remediation teams. The final agreement may contain other
conditions and targeted time frames as specified by the regulators.
The Company believes that the successful completion of all or a significant portion of the
Capital Plan will enable the Bank to meet the requirements of any
formal supervisory action with the
regulators and will ensure that the Bank is able to comply with applicable bank regulations. If,
however, we are unable to successfully implement the Capital Plan and cannot comply with the terms
of a formal supervisory action with the regulators or any other applicable regulations, we could become
subject to additional, heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our regulators were to take
such additional actions, we could become subject to various restrictions limiting our ability to
develop new business lines, and we could be required to raise additional capital, and/or dispose of
certain assets and liabilities. The terms of any such additional regulatory actions, orders or
agreements could have a materially adverse effect on the business of the Bank and the Company.
Changes in economic conditions, in particular a continued economic slowdown in Chicago, Illinois,
could hurt our business materially.
Our business is directly affected by factors such as economic, political and market
conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in
government monetary and fiscal policies and inflation, all of which are beyond its control. A
continued deterioration in economic conditions, in particular a continuing economic slowdown in
Chicago, Illinois, and surrounding areas, has resulted and may continue to result in the following
consequences, any of which could hurt or continue to hurt the Companys business materially:
|
|
loan delinquencies may continue to increase or remain at elevated levels;
|
|
|
|
problem assets and foreclosures may continue to increase or remain at elevated levels;
|
|
|
|
unemployment may continue to increase;
|
|
|
|
demand for our products and services may decline;
|
|
|
|
low cost or noninterest bearing deposits may decrease; and
|
|
|
|
collateral for loans made by us, especially residential and commercial real estate, may
decline or continue to decline in value, in turn reducing customers borrowing power, and reducing
the value of assets and collateral associated with our existing loans.
|
A large percentage of our loans are collateralized by real estate, including our construction
loans, and adverse changes in the real estate market may result in losses and adversely affect our
profitability.
A majority of the Companys loan portfolio is comprised of loans at least partially
collateralized by real estate; a substantial portion of this real estate collateral is located in
the Chicago market.
As of September 30, 2009, commercial real estate loans totaled $1.3 billion, or 50% of the
Companys
PAGE 70
total loan portfolio, and construction loans, including land acquisition and development,
totaled an additional $352.1 million, or 13% of its total loan portfolio.
Adverse changes in the economy affecting real estate values generally or in the Chicago market
specifically could significantly impair the value of our collateral and our ability to sell the
collateral upon foreclosure. In the event of a default with respect to any of these loans, amounts
received upon sale of the collateral may be insufficient to recover outstanding principal and interest on the loans. As
a result, our profitability could be negatively impacted by an adverse change in the real estate
market.
Construction and land acquisition and development lending involve additional risks because
funds may be advanced based upon values associated with the completed project, which is uncertain.
Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, as well as the market value
of the completed project and the effects of governmental regulation of real property, it is
relatively difficult to evaluate accurately the total funds required to complete a project and the
related loan-to-value ratio. As a result, construction loans often involve the disbursement of
substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project and the
ability of the borrower to sell or lease the property, rather than the ability of the borrower or
guarantor to repay principal and interest. If our appraisal of the anticipated value of the
completed project proves to be overstated, we may have inadequate security for the loan.
The Companys allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover actual loan losses, which
could adversely affect its results of operations or its financial condition.
As a lender, the Company is exposed to the risk that its loan customers may not repay their
loans according to their terms and that the collateral securing the payment of these loans may be
insufficient to assure repayment. The Company has and may continue to experience significant loan
losses, which could continue to have a material adverse effect on its operating results. Management
makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of the Companys loan portfolio,
which are based in part on:
|
|
current economic conditions and their estimated effects on specific borrowers;
|
|
|
|
an evaluation of the existing relationships among loans, potential loan losses and the
present level of the allowance;
|
|
|
|
managements internal review of the loan portfolio; and
|
|
|
|
results of examinations of its loan portfolio by regulatory agencies.
|
The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses in an attempt to cover probable incurred
loan losses inherent in its loan portfolio. Additional loan losses will likely continue to occur in
the future and may occur at a rate greater than experienced historically. In determining the amount
of the allowance, the Company relies on an analysis of its loan portfolio, experience, and
evaluation of general economic conditions. If the Companys assumptions and analysis prove to be
incorrect, its current allowance may not be sufficient. In addition, adjustments may be necessary
to allow for unexpected volatility or deterioration in the local or national economy or other
factors such as changes in interest rates that may be beyond its control. In addition, federal and
state regulators periodically review its allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to
increase its provision for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs, based on judgments
different than those of management. Any increase in the Companys loan allowance or loan
charge-offs could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations.
The Companys nonperforming assets, which consist of nonaccrual loans, foreclosed real estate
and other repossessed assets, may also impact the sufficiency of the Companys allowance for loan
losses. Nonperforming assets totaled $214.9 million as of September 30, 2009, an increase of $146.4
million, or 214%, from $68.5 million at September 30, 2008.
PAGE 71
In addition to those loans currently identified and classified as nonperforming loans,
management is aware that other possible credit problems may exist with some borrowers. These
include loans that are migrating from grades with lower risk of loss probabilities into grades with
higher risk of loss probabilities as performance and potential repayment issues surface. The
Company monitors these loans and adjusts loss rates in its allowance for loan losses accordingly.
The most severe of these loans are credits that are classified as substandard assets due to either
less than satisfactory performance history, lack of borrowers paying capacity, or inadequate
collateral.
While the Company attempts to manage the risk from changes in market interest rates, interest rate
risk management techniques are not exact. In addition, the Company may not be able to economically
hedge its interest rate risk. A rapid or substantial increase or decrease in interest rates could
adversely affect its net interest income and results of operations.
The Companys net income depends primarily upon its net interest income. Net interest income
is income that remains after deducting, from total income generated by earning assets, the interest
expense attributable to the acquisition of the funds required to support earning assets. Income
from earning assets includes income from loans, investment securities and short-term investments.
The amount of interest income is dependent on many factors, including the volume of earning assets,
the general level of interest rates, the dynamics of changes in interest rates and the level of
nonperforming loans. The cost of funds varies with the amount of funds required to support earning
assets, the rates paid to attract and hold deposits, rates paid on borrowed funds and the levels of
non-interest-bearing demand deposits and equity capital.
Different types of assets and liabilities may react differently, and at different times, to
changes in market interest rates. The Company expects that it will periodically experience gaps
in the interest rate sensitivities of its assets and liabilities. That means either its
interest-bearing liabilities will be more sensitive to changes in market interest rates than its
interest earning assets, or vice versa. When interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice more
quickly than interest earning assets, an increase in market rates of interest could reduce the
Companys net interest income. Likewise, when interest-earning assets mature or reprice more
quickly than interest-bearing liabilities, falling interest rates could reduce net interest income.
The Company is unable to predict changes in market interest rates which are affected by many
factors beyond its control including inflation, recession, unemployment, money supply, domestic and
international events and changes in the United States and other financial markets. Based on its net
interest income simulation model, if market interest rates were to increase immediately by 100 or
200 basis points (a parallel and immediate shift of the yield curve) net interest income would be
expected to increase by 12.20% and 26.04%, respectively, from what it would be if rates were to
remain at December 31, 2008 levels. The actual amount of any increase or decrease may be higher or
lower than that predicted by the Companys simulation model. Net interest income is not only
affected by the level and direction of interest rates, but also by the shape of the yield curve,
relationships between interest sensitive instruments and key driver rates, balance sheet growth,
client loan and deposit preferences and the timing of changes in these variables.
As result of current market conditions, the Companys net interest income simulation model did
not test the effects of 1.0% and 2.0% decreases in market interest rates at December 31, 2008 or
September 30, 2009 as those decreases would result in some deposit interest rate assumptions
falling below zero. Nonetheless, the Companys net interest income could decline in those scenarios
as yields on earning assets could continue to adjust downward. Although the Company is seeking to
mitigate this risk by instituting interest rate floors into its variable-rate loan products,
continuation of the existing interest rate environment, featuring an historically low absolute
level of market rates of interest, could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The Company attempts to manage risk from changes in market interest rates, in part, by
controlling the mix of interest rate-sensitive assets and interest rate-sensitive liabilities. The
Company continually reviews its interest rate risk position and modifies its strategies based on
projections to minimize the impact of future interest rate changes. The Company also uses financial
instruments with optionality to modify its exposure to changes in interest rates. However, interest
rate risk management techniques are not exact. A rapid increase or decrease in interest rates could
adversely affect results of operations and financial performance.
PAGE 72
We may not be able to access sufficient and cost-effective sources of liquidity necessary to fund
our operations and meet our payment obligations under our existing funding commitments, including
the repayment of our brokered deposits.
We depend on access to a variety of funding sources, including deposits, to provide sufficient
liquidity to meet our commitments and business needs and to accommodate the transaction and cash
management needs of our clients, including funding our loan growth. We must also have sufficient
funds available to satisfy our obligation to repay any wholesale borrowings we have outstanding,
including brokered deposits, when they come due. Currently, our primary sources of liquidity are
our clients deposits, as well as brokered deposits, federal funds borrowings, the Federal Reserve
Bank Discount Window, Federal Home Loan Bank advances and repayments and maturities of loans and
securities.
To the extent our deposit growth is not commensurate with our funding needs, we may need to
access alternative, more expensive funding sources, including increasing our reliance on brokered
deposits. Addressing these funding needs will be even more challenging if the amount of brokered
deposits we utilize approaches our internal policy limits or, if the Bank fails to maintain
well-capitalized status, the FDIC requires us to obtain its permission in order to renew any
maturing brokered deposits, or if the Federal Home Loan Bank places more stringent requirements on
our ability to borrow funds. Likewise, the federal funds market, which is an important short-term
liquidity source for us, has experienced a high degree of volatility and disruption since the
second quarter of 2008. In 2009, we experienced an increase in deposits that has allowed us to
reduce to some extent our reliance on wholesale funding sources for the time being. However, there
can be no assurance that this level of deposit growth will continue or that we will be able to
maintain the lower reliance on wholesale deposits that we have experienced in the last quarter.
There is also no way to determine with any degree of certainty the reasons for the recent growth in
our deposits and, hence, whether these deposits are, in whole or in part, permanent or transitory.
If the returns in the equity markets continue to improve or FDIC insurance coverage is reduced,
some of our deposits could move to higher yielding investment alternatives, thus causing a
reduction in our deposits and increased reliance on wholesale funding sources. If in the future
additional cost-effective funding is not available on terms satisfactory to us or at all, we may
not be able to meet our funding obligations, which could adversely affect our results of operations
and earnings.
Our holding companys liquidity position is affected by the amount of cash and other liquid
assets on hand, payment of interest and dividends on debt and equity instruments issued by the
holding company (all of which have been recently suspended or deferred), capital we inject into the
Bank, any redemption of debt for cash issued by the holding company, proceeds we raise through the
issuance of debt and/or equity instruments through the holding company, if any, and dividends
received from the Bank. Our future liquidity position may be adversely affected if a
combination of the following events occurs: the Bank continues to experience net losses and,
accordingly, is unable or prohibited by our regulators to pay a dividend to the holding company
sufficient to satisfy our holding companys cash flow needs, we deem it advisable or are required
by the Federal Reserve to use cash at the holding company to support the capital position of the
Bank, the Bank fails to remain well-capitalized and, accordingly, our regulators require us to
obtain prior approval to renew our existing brokered deposits or originate additional brokered
deposits, we are required to provide additional collateral against our FHLB borrowings and are
unable to do so, or we have difficulty raising cash at the holding company level through the
issuance of debt or equity instruments or accessing additional sources of credit. Our financial
flexibility will be severely constrained if we are unable to maintain our access to funding or if
adequate financing is not available. If we are required to rely more heavily on more expensive
funding sources to support our business, our revenues may not increase proportionately to cover our
costs. In this case, our operating margins would be adversely affected. A lack of liquidity and
cost-effective funding alternatives would materially adversely affect our results of operations and
earnings.
PAGE 73
In addition, the agreements with one of the Banks repurchase agreement counterparties permit
that counterparty to terminate the repurchase agreements if the Bank does not maintain its
well-capitalized status. At
September 30, 2009 the Banks repurchase agreements with those provisions totaled $262.7
million with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.76% to 4.65%, maturities ranging from
approximately 7.5 to 8.5 years, and call provisions (at the counterpartys option) ranging from
three months to one year. Due to the relatively high fixed rates on these borrowings as compared to
currently low market rates of interest, the Bank would incur substantial costs to unwind these
repurchase agreements if terminated prior to their maturities. Accordingly, if the Bank does not
maintain its well-capitalized status and the counterparty exercises its option to terminate one or
more of these repurchase agreements prior to maturity, the associated unwind costs could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
The Companys cost of funds for banking operations may increase as a result of general economic
conditions, interest rates and competitive pressures.
The Bank has traditionally obtained funds principally through deposits and borrowings. As a
general matter, deposits are a cheaper source of funds than borrowings, because interest rates paid
for deposits are typically less than interest rates charged for borrowings. Historically and in
comparison to commercial banking averages, the Bank has had a higher percentage of its time
deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more and brokered certificates of deposit. Within the
banking industry, the amounts of such deposits are generally considered more likely to fluctuate
than deposits of smaller denominations. If, as a result of general economic conditions, market
interest rates, competitive pressures or otherwise, the value of deposits at the Bank decrease
relative to its overall banking operations, the Bank may have to rely more heavily on borrowings as
a source of funds in the future.
Changes in the mix of the Companys funding sources could have an adverse effect on its
income. 33% of the Companys funding sources as of September 30, 2009 are in lower-rate
transactional deposit accounts. Market rate increases or competitive pricing could heighten the
risk of moving to higher-rate funding sources, which would cause an adverse impact on its net
income.
The Company is party to loan agreements that require it to observe certain covenants that limit its
flexibility in operating its business; and it has recently breached covenants under its loan
agreements, which , as a result, have given its lenders the right to take certain courses of
actions that have been and, with respect to unexercised rights, would be significantly detrimental
to holders of the Companys securities.
Under the terms of an amendment to the Companys existing $15.0 million revolving credit
facility, the Company and the lender previously agreed to extend the maturity of the short-term
revolving line of credit until July 3, 2009. Prior to that date, the revolving line of credit bore
interest at the 30 day LIBOR plus 155 basis points, with a floor of 4.25%. Currently, the Company
has $8.6 million outstanding on the revolving line of credit together with $55.0 million
outstanding under a separate term note. These loans are secured by all of the outstanding shares of
stock of the Bank.
The Company is obligated to meet certain covenants under its loan agreements. Recently, the
Company has breached certain of its covenants under its loan agreements and has been advised of
certain events of default, including as follows:
|
|
|
The Company advised its lender that its ratio of non-performing loans to total loans was
3.5% at March 31, 2009. In addition, the Company posted a net loss for the first quarter of 2009.
Subsequently, the lender notified the Company that it was not in compliance with both the
non-performing loans to total loans covenant and the profitability covenant in the loan agreements
for the period ending March 31, 2009 (collectively, the Financial Covenant Defaults).
|
PAGE 74
|
|
|
The Company did not make a required $5.0 million principal payment due on July 1, 2009. As
previously reported, the Company has sought covenant waivers on two occasions since December 31,
2007. The lender waived a covenant violation in the first quarter of 2008 resulting from the
Companys net loss recognized in that period. On March 4, 2009, the lender waived a covenant
violation for the third quarter of 2008 resulting from the Companys net loss recognized in that
period, contingent upon the Company making accelerated principal payments under the term loan
agreement in the amounts and on or prior to the dates shown below:
|
July 1, 2009 $5.0 million
October 1, 2009 $5.0 million
January 4, 2010 $5.0 million
Previously, no principal payments were due under the term loan agreement until its final
maturity date of September 28, 2010. This contingent waiver further provides that if the Company
raises $15.0 million in new capital pursuant to an offering of common or convertible preferred
stock, then the Company will not be obligated to make any of the accelerated principal payments
specified above that fall due after the date on which the Company receives such $15.0 million in
new capital, until the final maturity date of September 28, 2010.
On July 8, 2009, the lender advised the Company that the failure to make the required $5
million principal payment on July 1, 2009 constituted a continuing event of default under the loan
agreements (the Contingent Waiver Default). The Company also did not make the $5 million
principal payment on October 1, 2009. The Companys decision not to make the principal payment,
together with its previously announced decision to suspend the dividend on its Series A Preferred
Stock and defer the dividends on its Series T preferred stock and interest payments on its trust
preferred securities, were made in order to retain cash and preserve liquidity and capital at the
holding company.
|
|
|
Finally, the revolving line of credit matured on July 3, 2009 and the Company did not pay to
the lender all of the aggregate outstanding principal on the revolving line of credit on such date.
The failure to make such payments constitutes an additional event of default under the loan
agreements (the Payment Default; the Financial Covenant Defaults, the Contingent Wavier Default,
and the Payment Default are hereinafter collectively referred to as the Existing Events of
Default).
|
As a result of the occurrence and the continuance of the Existing Events of Default, the
lender notified the Company that, as of July 8, 2009, the interest rate on the revolving line of
credit increased to the default interest rate of 7.25%, and the interest rate under the term loan
agreement increased to the default interest rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 455 basis points.
A breach of any of the covenants under the loan agreements results in a default under the loan
agreements. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lender may, among other remedies, (1)
cease permitting the Company to borrow further under the line of credit, (2) terminate any
outstanding commitment and (3) seize the outstanding shares of the Banks capital stock held by the
Company which have been pledged as collateral for borrowings under the loan agreements. If the
lender were to take one or more of these actions, it could have a
material adverse effect on the
Companys reputation and operations, and investors could
lose their investment in the securities.
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement with the lender,
pursuant to which, among other things, the lender agreed to forbear from exercising the rights and
remedies available to it as a consequence of the Existing Events of Default (the Forbearance),
except for continuing to impose default rates of interest. The Forbearance is effective for the
period beginning July 3, 2009 until March 31, 2010, or earlier if, among other things, the Company
breaches representations and warranties contained in the
PAGE 75
forbearance agreement, or the Company defaults on certain obligations under its loan
agreements (other than with respect to certain financial and regulatory covenants) or the Bank
becomes subject to receivership by the FDIC or the Company becomes subject to other bankruptcy or
insolvency type proceeding.
Although it is not exercising all of its rights and remedies at this time (other than the
continued imposition of the default rates of interest on the revolving line of credit and the term
loan agreement), the lender has not waived, or committed to waive, the Existing Events of Default
or any other default or event of default.
Upon the expiration of the Forbearance, the principal and interest payments that were due
under the revolving line of credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers, at the
time the forbearance agreement was entered into will once again become due and payable, along with
such other amounts as may have become due during the Forbearance. Absent successful completion of
all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would not be able to
meet any demands for payment of amounts then due at the expiration of the Forbearance. If the
Company is unable to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources of financing on acceptable
terms, it may have a material adverse effect on the Companys business and results of operations.
Upon liquidation, holders of the Companys debt securities and lenders with respect to other
borrowings will receive, and any holders of preferred stock that is currently outstanding and that
it may issue in the future may receive, a distribution of the available assets prior to holders of
Common Stock. The decisions by investors and lenders to enter into equity and financing and
refinancing transactions with the Company will depend upon a number of factors, including the
Companys historical and projected financial performance, compliance with the terms of its current
loan arrangements, industry and market trends, the availability of capital and its investors and
lenders policies and rates applicable thereto, and the relative attractiveness of alternative
investment or lending opportunities. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
raise sufficient capital to return to compliance under its existing debt arrangements or pay the
loans in full.
Our common stock could be delisted from Nasdaq.
Our common stock is currently listed on Nasdaq. On September 15, 2009, we received a letter
notifying us of our failure to maintain a minimum closing bid price of $1.00 per share on our
common stock over the preceding 30 consecutive business days as required by Nasdaq rules.
Accordingly, we have until March 15, 2010 to demonstrate compliance by maintaining a minimum
closing bid price of at least $1.00 for a minimum of ten consecutive business days. If we do not
regain compliance with the minimum closing bid price rule by March 15, 2010, our common stock will
become subject to delisting by Nasdaq. In such an event, we may be eligible for an additional grace
period by transferring our common stock listing from the Nasdaq Global Market to the Nasdaq Capital
Market. To transfer our listing to the Nasdaq Capital Market, we will be required to meet Nasdaq
Capital Markets initial listing criteria, other than with respect to the minimum closing bid price
requirement. If we are then permitted to transfer our listing to the Nasdaq Capital Market, we
expect that we would be granted an additional 180 calendar day compliance period. If we are not
eligible to transfer to the Nasdaq Capital Market or for an additional compliance period, we could
appeal Nasdaqs determination to delist its common stock.
Although we would have an opportunity to regain compliance with Nasdaqs minimum bid price
requirement during the compliance periods described above, the perception or possibility that our
Common Stock could be delisted in the future could negatively affect the liquidity and price of our
Common Stock. Delisting would have an adverse effect on the liquidity of our common stock and, as a
result, the market price for our common stock might become more volatile. Delisting could also make
it more difficult for us to raise additional capital. Although we expect that quotes for our common
stock would continue to be available on the OTC Bulletin Board or on the Pink Sheets, such
alternatives are generally considered to be less efficient markets, and our stock price, as well as
the liquidity of our common stock, may be adversely impacted as a result.
PAGE 76
Also, in the future we could fall out of compliance with other minimum criteria for continued
listing, including minimum market capitalization, minimum stockholders equity and minimum public
float. A failure to meet any of these other continued listing requirements could result in
delisting of our Common Stock.
Markets have experienced, and may continue to experience, periods of high volatility accompanied by
reduced liquidity.
Financial markets are susceptible to severe events evidenced by rapid depreciation in asset
values accompanied by a reduction in asset liquidity. Under these extreme conditions, hedging and
other risk management strategies may not be as effective at mitigating trading losses as they would
be under more normal market conditions. Moreover, under these conditions market participants are
particularly exposed to trading strategies employed by many market participants simultaneously and
on a large scale, such as crowded trades. The Companys risk management and monitoring processes
seek to quantify and mitigate risk to more extreme market moves. Severe market events have
historically been difficult to predict, however, and the Company could realize significant losses
if unprecedented extreme market events were to occur, such as the recent conditions in the global
financial markets and global economy.
Concern of the Companys customers over deposit insurance may cause a decrease in deposits.
With recent increased concerns about bank failures, customers increasingly are concerned about
the extent to which their deposits are insured by the FDIC. Customers may withdraw deposits in an
effort to ensure that the amount they have on deposit with their bank is fully insured. Decreases
in deposits may adversely affect the Companys funding costs, net income, and liquidity.
The Companys deposit insurance premium could be substantially higher in the future, which could
have a material adverse effect on our future earnings.
The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insured financial institutions, including the Bank. The FDIC
charges the insured financial institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund at a
certain level. Current economic conditions have increased bank failures and expectations for
further failures, in which case the FDIC ensures payments of deposits up to insured limits from the
Deposit Insurance Fund.
On October 7, 2008, the FDIC released a five-year recapitalization plan and a proposal to
raise premiums to recapitalize the fund. In order to implement the restoration plan, the FDIC
proposed to change both its risk- based assessment system and its base assessment rates. Assessment
rates would increase by seven basis points across the range of risk weightings. In December 2008,
the FDIC adopted its rule, uniformly increasing the risk-based assessment rates by seven basis
points, annually, resulting in a range of risk-based assessment of 12 basis points to 50 basis
points. Changes to the risk-based assessment system would include increasing premiums for
institutions that rely on excessive amounts of brokered deposits, increasing premiums for excessive
use of secured liabilities, and lowering premiums for smaller institutions with very high capital
levels.
On May 22, 2009, the FDIC board agreed to impose an emergency special assessment of five basis
points on all banks to restore the Deposit Insurance Fund to an acceptable level. The assessment,
which was payable on September 30, 2009, is in addition to a planned increase in premiums and a
change in the way regular premiums are assessed, which the FDIC board previously approved. This
emergency special assessment for the Company was approximately $1.7 million. The FDIC also has
publicly stated that at least one additional special assessment for 2009 is probable. On September
29, 2009, the FDIC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that, if adopted, would require
FDIC-insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth
quarter 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012, but would supplant the proposed additional special
assessment for 2009. These increases in premium assessments and current and
PAGE 77
future special assessments have increased and may continue to increase our expenses and
adversely impact our earnings.
Defaults by another financial institution could adversely affect financial markets generally.
Since mid-2007, the financial services industry as a whole, as well as the securities markets
generally, have been materially and adversely affected by very significant declines in the values
of nearly all asset classes and by a very serious lack of liquidity. Financial institutions in
particular have been subject to increased volatility and an overall loss in investor confidence.
The commercial soundness of many financial institutions may be closely interrelated as a
result of credit, trading, clearing, or other relationships between the institutions. As a result,
concerns about, or a default or threatened default by, one institution could lead to significant
market-wide liquidity and credit problems, losses, or defaults by other institutions. This is
sometimes referred to as systemic risk and may adversely affect financial intermediaries, such as
clearing agencies, clearing houses, banks, securities firms and exchanges, with which the Company
interacts on a daily basis, and therefore could adversely affect the Company.
The Companys ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by
the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. As a result, defaults by, or
even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services companies, or the financial services
industry generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults
by us or by other institutions. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of
default of our counterparty or client. In addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the
collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the
full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due us. There is no assurance that any such losses
would not materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
The widespread effect of falling housing prices on financial markets has adversely affected and
could continue to adversely affect the Companys profitability, liquidity, and financial condition.
Turmoil in the financial markets, precipitated by falling housing prices and rising
delinquencies and foreclosures, has negatively impacted the valuation of securities supported by
real estate collateral, including certain securities owned by the Company. The Company has
experienced losses of $82.1 million on investments in government sponsored enterprises, such as
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which has materially adversely impacted its capital base. The Company
relies on its investment securities portfolio as a source of net interest income and as a means to
manage its funding and liquidity needs. If defaults in the underlying collateral are such that the
security can no longer meet its debt service requirements, the Companys net interest income, cash
flows, and capital will be reduced.
The value of securities in the Companys investment securities portfolio may be negatively affected
by continued disruptions in securities markets.
The market for some of the investment securities held in the Companys portfolio has become
extremely volatile over the past twelve months. Volatile market conditions may detrimentally affect
the value of these securities, such as through reduced valuations due to the perception of
heightened credit and liquidity risks. There can be no assurance that the declines in market value
associated with these disruptions will not result in other than temporary impairments of these
assets, which would lead to accounting charges that could have a material adverse effect on our net
income and capital levels.
If the Company is required to write down goodwill or other intangible assets or if it is required
to mark-to-market certain of its assets or further reduce its deferred tax assets by a valuation
allowance, its financial condition and results of operations would be negatively affected.
PAGE 78
When the Company acquires a business, a portion of the purchase price of the acquisition may
be allocated to goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. The amount of the purchase price which
is allocated to goodwill is determined by the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of
the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired. At September 30, 2009, the Companys
goodwill and identifiable intangible assets were approximately $91.8 million. Under generally
accepted accounting principles, if the Company determines that the carrying value of its goodwill
or intangible assets is impaired, the Company is required to write down the value of these assets.
The Company conducts an annual review to determine whether goodwill and identifiable intangible
assets are impaired.
Under the authoritative guidance for intangibles goodwill and other (ASC 350), goodwill
must be tested for impairment annually and, under certain circumstances, at intervening interim
dates. A goodwill impairment test also could be triggered between annual testing dates if an event
occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value below the
carrying amount. Examples of those events or circumstances would include the following:
|
|
|
significant adverse change in business climate;
|
|
|
|
|
significant unanticipated loss of clients/assets under management;
|
|
|
|
|
unanticipated loss of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
|
sustained periods of poor investment performance;
|
|
|
|
|
significant loss of deposits or loans;
|
|
|
|
|
significant reductions in profitability; or
|
|
|
|
|
significant changes in loan credit quality.
|
The Companys goodwill and intangible assets are reviewed annually for impairment as of
September 30th of each year. This review in 2008 was conducted with the assistance of a third party
valuation specialist. In conducting the review, the market value of the Companys common stock,
estimated control premiums, projected cash flow and various pricing analyses are all taken into
consideration to determine if the fair value of the assets and liabilities in its business exceed
their carrying amounts. On September 30, 2008, the Company recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment
charge of $80.0 million. This goodwill impairment charge was not tax deductible, did not impact its
tangible equity or regulatory capital ratios, and did not adversely affect its overall liquidity
position. It is classified as a noninterest expense item. During each of the quarters ended
December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, management considered whether events and
circumstances would require an interim test of goodwill impairment. Management concluded that it
was not more likely than not that these events and changes in circumstances, both individual and in
the aggregate, reduced the fair value of the Companys single reporting unit below its carrying
amount. Managements analysis was based on changes in the key indicators and inputs that were used
to determine the fair values at September 30, 2008. The Company also completed its annual goodwill
impairment study as of September 30, 2009 and determined that goodwill was not impaired.
We will continue to assess any shortfall in the Companys market capitalization relative to
its total book value and tangible book value, which management currently attributes to both
industry-wide and Company-specific factors, and to evaluate whether any additional adjustments are
required in the carrying value of goodwill. If the Companys common stock continues to trade at a
price below book value, the Company may be required in a future period to recognize an impairment
of all, or some portion, of its remaining goodwill. The Company cannot assure that it will not be
required to take additional goodwill impairment charges in the future. Any impairment charge would
have a negative effect on its stockholders equity and financial results. If an impairment charge
is significant enough to result in negative net income for the period, it could affect the
PAGE 79
ability of the Bank to upstream dividends to the Company, which could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys liquidity.
If the Company decides to sell a loan or a portfolio of loans it is required to classify those
loans as held for sale, which requires it to carry such loans at the lower of cost or market. If it
decides to sell loans at a time when the fair market value of those loans is less than their
carrying value, the adjustment will result in a loss. The Company may from time to time decide to
sell particular loans or groups of loans, for example to resolve classified loans, and the required
adjustment could negatively affect its financial condition or results of operations.
The Company also is required, under generally accepted accounting principles, to assess the
need for a valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets. If, based on the weight of available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not
be realized, the Company would be required to reduce its deferred tax assets by a valuation
allowance and increase income tax expense. We recently established a valuation allowance of $60.0
million related to our deferred tax assets, which contributed significantly to our net loss for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009. At September 30, 2009, the valuation allowance increased to $76.9
million and our net deferred tax asset was $4.1 million and we may be required to reduce this
remaining amount in the future, which would adversely affect our earnings or exacerbate any net
loss.
If the Companys investment in the common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago is other
than temporarily impaired, its financial condition and results of operations could be materially
impaired.
The Bank owns common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, FHLBC. The common stock
is held to qualify for membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank System and to be eligible to borrow
funds under the FHLBCs advance program. The aggregate cost and fair value of the Companys FHLBC
common stock as of September 30, 2009 was $17.0 million based on its par value. There is no market
for the FHLBC common stock.
On October 10, 2007, the FHLBC entered into a consensual cease and desist order with the
Federal Housing Finance Board, now known as the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the FHFA. Under the
terms of the order, capital stock repurchases and redemptions, including redemptions upon
membership withdrawal or other termination, are prohibited unless the FHLBC receives the prior
approval of the Director of the Office of Supervision of the FHFA, the Director. The order also
provides that dividend declarations are subject to the prior written approval of the Director and
required the FHLBC to submit a capital structure plan to the FHFA. The FHLBC has not declared any
dividends since the order was issued and it has not received approval of a capital structure plan.
In July of 2008, the FHFA amended the order to permit the FHLBC to repurchase or redeem
newly-issued capital stock to support new advances, subject to certain conditions set forth in the
order. The Companys FHLBC common stock is not newly issued and is not affected by this amendment.
Recent published reports indicate that certain member banks of the Federal Home Loan Bank
System could have materially lower regulatory capital levels due to the application of certain
accounting rules and asset quality issues. In an extreme situation, it is possible that the
capitalization of a Federal Home Loan Bank, including the FHLBC, could be substantially diminished
or reduced to zero. The Companys FHLBC common stock is accounted for in accordance with the
authoritative guidance for financial services depository and lending (ASC 942-325-35). This
guidance provides that, for impairment testing purposes, the value of long term investments such as
FHLBC common stock is based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value of the security
without regard to temporary declines in value. Consequently, if events occur that give rise to
substantial doubt about the ultimate recoverability of the par value of the Companys FHLBC common
stock, this investment could be deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, and the impairment
loss that we would be required to record would cause our earnings to decrease by the after-tax
amount of the impairment loss.
PAGE 80
As a bank holding company that conducts substantially all of the Companys operations through its
subsidiaries, its ability to pay dividends, repurchase its shares, or to repay its indebtedness
depends upon liquid assets held by the bank holding company as well as the results of operations of
the Companys subsidiaries the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to other restrictions.
The Company is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries and it receives
substantially all of its revenue from dividends from its subsidiaries. The Companys net income
depends primarily upon its net interest income. Net interest income is income that remains after
deducting from total income generated by earning assets the interest expense attributable to the
acquisition of the funds required to support earning assets. Income from earning assets includes
income from loans, investment securities and short-term investments. The amount of interest income
is dependent on many factors including the volume of earning assets, the general level of interest
rates, the dynamics of changes in interest rates and the levels of nonperforming loans. The cost of
funds varies with the amount of funds necessary to support earning assets, the rates paid to
attract and hold deposits, rates paid on borrowed funds and the levels of noninterest-bearing
demand deposits and equity capital.
Most of the Companys ability to pay dividends and make payments on its debt securities comes
from amounts paid to it by the Bank. Under applicable banking law, the total dividends declared in
any calendar year by the Bank may not, without the approval of the Federal Reserve exceed the
aggregate of the Banks net profits and retained net profits for the preceding two years. The Bank
is also subject to limits on dividends under the Illinois Banking Act. The Bank will not be able to
pay dividends to the Company in 2009 without prior approval of the Federal Reserve.
If, in the opinion of the federal bank regulatory agency, a depository institution under its
jurisdiction is engaged in or is about to engage in an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending
on the financial condition of the depository institution, could include the payment of dividends),
the agency may require that the bank cease and desist from the practice. The Federal Reserve has
similar authority with respect to bank holding companies. In addition, the federal bank regulatory
agencies have issued policy statements which provide that insured banks and bank holding companies
should generally only pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Finally, these regulatory
authorities have established guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of
capital by a bank, bank holding company or savings association under their jurisdiction. Compliance
with the standards set forth in these guidelines could limit the amount of dividends that the
Company and its affiliates may pay in the future.
The Companys ability to declare and pay dividends is also subject to:
|
|
|
the terms of junior subordinated debentures of the Company, pursuant to which it can not
declare or pay any dividends or distributions on, or redeem, purchase, acquire or make a
liquidation payment with respect to, any of its Common Stock or preferred stock if, at that time,
there is a default under the junior subordinated debentures or a related guarantee or it has
delayed interest payments on the securities issued under the junior indenture; and
|
|
|
|
|
the Companys outstanding Series A and Series T Preferred Stock, which have preference over
the Companys Common Stock with respect to the payment of dividends as well as distributions of
assets upon liquidation, and no dividends on the Common Stock may be declared and paid unless and
until dividends have been paid on its preferred stock.
|
The Company expects to seek or may be compelled to seek additional capital in the future, but
capital may not be available when it is needed.
The Company is required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate
levels of capital to support its operations. A number of financial institutions have recently
raised considerable amounts of
PAGE 81
capital as a result of deterioration in their results of operations and financial condition
arising from the turmoil in the mortgage loan market, deteriorating economic conditions, declines
in real estate values and other factors, which may diminish our ability to raise additional
capital. Our recently announced Capital Plan also contemplates raising capital in an effort to
improve our capital position.
The Companys ability to raise additional capital, as part of its Capital Plan or otherwise,
will depend on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other
factors, many of which are outside its control, and on its financial performance. Accordingly, the
Company cannot be assured of its ability to raise additional capital, as part of its Capital Plan
or otherwise, or on terms acceptable to it. If the Company cannot raise additional capital, as part
of its Capital Plan or otherwise, it may have a material adverse effect on its financial condition,
results of operations and prospects. If the Company cannot raise additional capital as part of its
Capital Plan or otherwise, it may be subject to increased regulatory supervision and the imposition
of restrictions on its operations and potential for growth. These restrictions could negatively
impact the Companys ability to manage or expand its operations in a manner that the Company may
deem beneficial to the Companys stockholders and could result in significant increases in its
operating expenses or decreases in its revenues.
The Companys effective tax rates may be adversely affected by changes in federal and state tax
laws.
The Companys effective tax rates may be adversely affected by changes in federal or state tax
laws, regulations and agency interpretations. In this regard, recent changes in Illinois laws may
adversely affect the Companys results of operations. Under prior tax law, the Company enjoyed
favorable tax treatment with respect to the dividends it received from Midwest Funding, L.L.C., a
captive real estate investment trust, or a REIT. A change in Illinois tax law relating to the
deductibility of captive REIT dividends eliminated this tax benefit beginning January 1, 2009, and
is likely to increase the Companys effective tax rate beginning in that year.
In addition, in connection with the determination of the Companys provision for income and
other taxes and during the preparation of its tax returns, management makes certain judgments based
upon reasonable interpretations of tax laws, regulations and agency interpretations which are
inherently complex. Managements interpretations are subject to challenge upon audit by the tax
authorities, which have become increasingly aggressive in challenging tax positions taken by
financial institutions, including certain positions that the Company has taken. If the Company is
not successful in defending the tax positions that it has taken, the Companys financial condition
and results of operations may be adversely affected.
An interruption in or breach in security of the Companys information systems may result in a loss
of customer business.
The Company relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business.
Any failure or interruptions or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or
disruptions in its customer relationship management, general ledger, deposits, servicing, or loan
origination systems. The occurrence of any failures or interruptions or breach in security could
result in a loss of customer business, costly remedial actions, or legal liabilities and have a
material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
Management regularly reviews and updates our internal controls, disclosure controls and
procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well
designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of our
controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and
financial condition.
PAGE 82
The Company relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business.
Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or
disruptions in our customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other
systems. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the
failure, interruption or security breach of the Companys information systems, there can be no
assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do
occur, that they will be adequately addressed. Additionally, the Company outsources a portion of
its data processing to a third party. If our third party provider encounters difficulties or if we
have difficulty in communicating with such third party, it will significantly affect our ability to
adequately process and account for customer transactions, which would significantly affect our
business operations. Furthermore, breaches of such third partys technology may also cause
reimbursable loss to our consumer and business customers, through no fault of our own. The
occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of information systems used to
process customer transactions could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business,
subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and possible
financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
The Company continually encounters technological change.
The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with
frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of
technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and to
reduce costs. The Companys future success depends, in part, upon its ability to address the needs
of its customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer
demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many competitors have
substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. The Company may not be
able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in
marketing these products and services to its customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with
technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact
on the Companys business and, in turn, its financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
The Companys business may be adversely affected by the highly regulated environment in which it
operates.
The Company is subject to extensive federal and state legislation, regulation and supervision.
The burden of regulatory compliance has increased under current legislation and banking regulations
and is likely to continue to have a significant impact on the financial services industry. Recent
legislative and regulatory changes, as well as changes in regulatory enforcement policies and
capital adequacy guidelines, are increasing the Companys costs of doing business and, as a result,
may create an advantage for its competitors who may not be subject to similar legislative and
regulatory requirements. In addition, future regulatory changes, including changes to regulatory
capital requirements, could have an adverse impact on the Companys future results. In addition,
the federal and state bank regulatory authorities who supervise the Company have broad
discretionary powers to take enforcement actions against banks for failure to comply with
applicable regulations and laws. If the Company fails to comply with applicable laws or
regulations, it could become subject to enforcement actions that have a material adverse effect on
its future results.
There can be no assurance that the recently enacted Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008,
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and other recently enacted government programs
will help stabilize the U.S. financial system.
On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, EESA, was enacted. The
U.S. Treasury and banking regulators have implemented and may continue to implement a number of
programs under this legislation and otherwise to address capital and liquidity issues in the
banking system, including the
PAGE 83
TARP Capital Purchase Program. In addition, other regulators have taken steps to attempt to
stabilize and add liquidity to the financial markets, such as the FDIC Temporary Liquidity
Guarantee Program, TLG Program, which we did not opt-out of. However, there can be no assurance
that we will issue any guaranteed debt under the TLG Program, or that we will participate in any
other stabilization programs in the future.
The EESA followed, and has been followed by, numerous actions by the Federal Reserve, the U.S.
Congress, U.S. Treasury, the FDIC, the SEC and others to address recent liquidity and credit
instability crises. These measures include homeowner relief that encourage loan restructuring and
modification; the establishment of significant liquidity and credit facilities for financial
institutions and investment banks; the lowering of the federal funds rate; emergency action against
short selling practices; a temporary guaranty program for money market funds; the establishment of
a commercial paper funding facility to provide back-stop liquidity to commercial paper issuers; and
coordinated international efforts to address illiquidity and other weaknesses in the banking
sector.
On February 17, 2009, President Barack Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009, ARRA, more commonly known as the economic stimulus or economic recovery package. ARRA
includes a wide variety of programs intended to stimulate the economy and provide for extensive
infrastructure, energy, health and education needs. In addition, ARRA imposes new executive
compensation and corporate governance limits on current and future participants in TARP, including
the Company, which are in addition to those previously announced by U.S. Treasury. The new limits
remain in place until the participant has redeemed the preferred stock sold to U.S. Treasury,
subject to U.S. Treasurys consultation with the recipients appropriate federal regulator.
On February 25, 2009, the U.S. Treasury announced the CAP pursuant to its authority under
EESA, applicable to publicly- held companies. CAP consists of two components. First, the U.S.
Treasury conducted a coordinated supervisory capital assessment exercise for each banking
organization whose assets exceed $100 billion. Second, the U.S. Treasury may purchase mandatory
convertible preferred stock from qualifying financial institutions in order to create a bridge to
private capital in the future. CAP is supplemental to the various programs enacted by the U.S.
Government and does not replace any existing program.
There can also be no assurance as to the ultimate impact that the EESA, the ARRA, the programs
promulgated under these acts and other programs will have on the financial markets, including the
extreme levels of volatility and limited credit availability currently being experienced. The
failure of the EESA, the ARRA and other programs to stabilize the financial markets and a
continuation or worsening of current financial market conditions could materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to credit or the trading
price of our common stock.
The EESA, the ARRA and the programs enacted under these acts are relatively new legislation
and regulations and, as such, are subject to change and evolving interpretation. There can be no
assurances as to the effects that such changes will have on the effectiveness of the EESA, the ARRA
or on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
The purpose of these legislative and regulatory actions is to stabilize the U.S. banking
system. The EESA, the ARRA and the other regulatory initiatives described above and which may be
proposed in the future may not have their desired effects. If the volatility in the markets
continues and economic conditions fail to improve or worsen, our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
The limitations on incentive compensation contained in the ARRA may adversely affect the Companys
ability to retain its highest performing employees.
PAGE 84
The ARRA imposes new executive compensation limits on participants in TARP, including the
Company, which are in addition to those previously announced by U.S. Treasury. The ARRA and
regulations promulgated under the ARRA contain numerous limitations on the amount and form of
compensation that may be paid to the highest paid employees, including restrictions on bonus and
other incentive compensation payable to the five executives named in a companys proxy statement,
restrictions on severance payments to the ten highest paid employees, and requirements for the
repayment of bonuses in certain circumstances by the 25 highest paid employees. It is possible that
the Company may be unable to create a compensation structure that permits it to retain its highest
performing employees. If this were to occur, the Companys business and results of operations could
be adversely affected, perhaps materially.
The Company is subject to claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility.
From time to time, customers make claims and take legal action pertaining to our performance
of our fiduciary responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to our
performance of our fiduciary responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal
actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to us, they may result in significant financial
liability and/or adversely affect the market perception of us and our products and services as well
as impact customer demand for our products and services. Any financial liability or reputation
damage could have a material adverse effect on our business, which, in turn, could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company is exposed to risk of environmental liabilities with respect to properties to which we
take title.
In the course of our business, we may own or foreclose and take title to real estate, and
could be subject to environmental liabilities with respect to these properties. We may be held
liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury,
investigation and clean-up costs incurred by these parties in connection with environmental
contamination, or may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic substances, or
chemical releases at a property. The costs associated with investigation or remediation activities
could be substantial. In addition, as the owner or former owner of a contaminated site, we may be
subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from
environmental contamination emanating from the property. If we ever become subject to significant
environmental liabilities, our business, financial condition, cash flows, liquidity and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other external events could
significantly impact our business.
Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other adverse external events
could have a significant impact on our ability to conduct business. Such events could affect the
stability of our deposit base; impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair
the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of
revenue and/or cause us to incur additional expenses. Although management has established disaster
recovery policies and procedures and is insured for these situations, the occurrence of any such
event could have a material adverse effect on our business, which, in turn, could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Non-Compliance with USA PATRIOT Act, Bank Secrecy Act, or Other Laws and Regulations Could Result
in Fines or Sanctions, and Curtail Expansion Opportunities
Financial institutions are required under the USA PATRIOT and Bank Secrecy Acts to develop
programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering and terrorist
activities. Financial institutions are also obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the
U.S. Treasury Departments Office of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network if such activities are
detected. These rules also require
PAGE 85
financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of
customers seeking to open new financial accounts. Failure or the inability to comply with these
regulations could result in fines or penalties, curtailment of expansion opportunities,
intervention or sanctions by regulators and costly litigation or expensive additional controls and
systems. During the last few years, several banking institutions have received large fines for
non-compliance with these laws and regulations. We have developed policies and continue to augment
procedures and systems designed to assist in compliance with these laws and regulations.
Provisions in the Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation and its amended and
restated bylaws may delay or prevent an acquisition of the Company by a third party.
The Companys amended and restated certificate of incorporation and its amended and restated
bylaws contain provisions that may make it more difficult for a third party to gain control or
acquire the Company without the consent of its board of directors. These provisions also could
discourage proxy contests and may make it more difficult for dissident stockholders to elect
representatives as directors and take other corporate actions. These provisions of the Companys
governing documents may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a
change in control that some or many of its stockholders might believe to be in their best interest.
PAGE 86
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are either filed as part of this report or are incorporated herein by
reference:
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company, as amended to date
(incorporated by reference to Registrants Report on Form 8-K filed
July 29, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Certain instruments defining the rights of the holders of long-term
debt of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, none of which
authorize a total amount of indebtedness in excess of 10% of the
total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis, have not been filed as Exhibits. The Company hereby agrees to
furnish a copy of any of these agreements to the SEC upon request.
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. Severance Policy
(incorporated by reference to Registrants Report on Form 8-K filed
July 29, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Forbearance agreement dated October 22, 2009 between the Company and
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (incorporated by reference to Registrants
Report on Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, from the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer.
|
PAGE 87
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 9, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Roberto R. Herencia
|
|
|
|
Roberto R. Herencia,
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
|
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek,
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
PAGE 88
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company, as amended to date
(incorporated by reference to Registrants Report on Form 8-K filed
July 29, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Certain instruments defining the rights of the holders of long-term
debt of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, none of which
authorize a total amount of indebtedness in excess of 10% of the
total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis, have not been filed as Exhibits. The Company hereby agrees to
furnish a copy of any of these agreements to the SEC upon request.
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. Severance Policy
(incorporated by reference to Registrants Report on Form 8-K filed
July 29, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Forbearance agreement dated October 22, 2009 between the Company and
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (incorporated by reference to Registrants
Report on Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, from the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer.
|
Midwest Banc Hlds (MM) (NASDAQ:MBHI)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jan 2025 até Fev 2025
Midwest Banc Hlds (MM) (NASDAQ:MBHI)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Fev 2024 até Fev 2025