Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009
Commission File Number: 001-13735
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter.)
     
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  36-3252484
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
     
501 W. North Ave.
Melrose Park, Illinois

(Address of principal executive offices)
  60160
(Zip code)
 
(708) 865-1053
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  þ  No  o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer  o Accelerated filer  þ   Non-accelerated filer  o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company  o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  o  No  o
     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  o  No  þ
     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
     
Class   Outstanding at November 9, 2009
Common, par value $0.01   28,116,312
 
 

 


 

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
         
    Page Number
 
       
PART I
       
 
       
Item 1. Financial Statements
    1  
 
       
    27  
 
       
    59  
 
       
    60  
 
       
       
 
       
    65  
 
       
    65  
 
       
    87  
 
       
    87  
 
       
    87  
 
       
    87  
 
       
    87  
 
       
    88  
  EX-31.1
  EX-31.2
  EX-32.1

i


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except for share data)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
ASSETS
               
Cash
  $ 32,278     $ 61,330  
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
    295,162       1,735  
 
           
Total cash and cash equivalents
    327,440       63,065  
Securities available-for-sale (securities pledged to creditors:
               
$480,614 at September 30, 2009 and $482,224 at December 31, 2008)
    615,543       621,949  
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value: $30,387 at December 31, 2008)
          30,267  
 
           
Total securities
    615,543       652,216  
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
    27,652       31,698  
Loans
    2,454,101       2,509,759  
Allowance for loan losses
    (83,506 )     (44,432 )
 
           
Net loans
    2,370,595       2,465,327  
Cash surrender value of life insurance
          84,675  
Premises and equipment, net
    40,589       38,313  
Foreclosed properties
    20,980       12,018  
Core deposit and other intangibles, net
    12,964       14,683  
Goodwill
    78,862       78,862  
Other assets
    49,505       129,355  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 3,544,130     $ 3,570,212  
 
           
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Liabilities
               
Deposits
               
Noninterest-bearing
  $ 330,901     $ 334,495  
Interest-bearing
    2,224,288       2,078,296  
 
           
Total deposits
    2,555,189       2,412,791  
Revolving note payable
    8,600       8,600  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    297,650       297,650  
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
    340,000       380,000  
Junior subordinated debentures
    60,828       60,791  
Subordinated debt
    15,000       15,000  
Term note payable
    55,000       55,000  
 
           
Total borrowings
    777,078       817,041  
Other liabilities
    31,624       34,546  
 
           
Total liabilities
    3,363,891       3,264,378  
 
           
 
               
Commitments and contingencies (see note 9)
               
 
               
Stockholders’ Equity
               
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; Series A, $2,500 liquidation preference, 17,250 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008; Series T, $1,000 liquidation preference, 84,784 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
    1       1  
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 64,000,000 shares authorized; 29,847,092 shares issued and 28,116,312 outstanding at September 30, 2009 and 29,530,878 shares issued and 27,892,578 outstanding at December 31, 2008
    301       296  
Additional paid-in capital
    385,219       383,491  
Warrant
    5,229       5,229  
Accumulated deficit
    (191,726 )     (66,325 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (4,032 )     (2,122 )
Treasury stock, at cost (1,730,780 shares at September 30, 2009 and 1,638,300 shares at December 31, 2008)
    (14,753 )     (14,736 )
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    180,239       305,834  
 
           
 
               
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 3,544,130     $ 3,570,212  
 
           
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

PAGE 1


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Interest Income
                               
Loans
  $ 33,294     $ 37,364     $ 103,191     $ 115,562  
Securities
                               
Taxable
    1,488       7,739       13,091       25,776  
Exempt from federal income taxes
    29       574       985       1,765  
Dividends from Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
    160       184       520       551  
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
    164       27       276       273  
 
                       
Total interest income
    35,135       45,888       118,063       143,927  
Interest Expense
                               
Deposits
    11,385       15,301       37,280       50,501  
Federal funds purchased and FRB discount window advances
          563       49       2,050  
Revolving note payable
    158       96       289       270  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    3,264       3,338       9,698       9,998  
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
    3,065       2,779       9,129       8,698  
Junior subordinated debentures
    497       864       1,851       2,785  
Subordinated debt
    145       229       441       464  
Term note payable
    679       565       1,227       2,027  
 
                       
Total interest expense
    19,193       23,735       59,964       76,793  
 
                       
Net interest income
    15,942       22,153       58,099       67,134  
Provision for credit losses
    37,450       42,200       71,453       52,367  
 
                       
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
    (21,508 )     (20,047 )     (13,354 )     14,767  
Noninterest Income
                               
Service charges on deposit accounts
    2,013       1,918       5,860       5,834  
Net gains (losses) on securities transactions
    386       (16,652 )     4,637       (16,596 )
Impairment loss on securities
          (47,801 )     (740 )     (65,387 )
Losses on sales of loans
          (75 )           (75 )
Insurance and brokerage commissions
    268       448       926       1,691  
Trust fees
    337       451       915       1,382  
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
          911       1,332       2,634  
Gain on sale of property
                      15,196  
Other
    653       288       1,365       993  
 
                       
Total noninterest income (loss)
    3,657       (60,512 )     14,295       (54,328 )
Noninterest Expense
                               
Salaries and employee benefits
    8,948       12,515       31,890       36,570  
Occupancy and equipment
    3,175       3,211       9,776       9,203  
Professional services
    2,838       2,016       6,830       5,350  
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
                      7,121  
Marketing
    201       575       1,228       1,864  
Foreclosed properties
    3,098       24       3,893       266  
Amortization of intangible assets
    573       590       1,719       1,771  
Merger related
          77             271  
Goodwill impairment
          80,000             80,000  
FDIC insurance
    1,550       1,465       5,986       2,099  
Other
    2,067       2,573       7,056       7,156  
 
                       
Total noninterest expense
    22,450       103,046       68,378       151,671  
 
                       
Loss before income taxes
    (40,301 )     (183,605 )     (67,437 )     (191,232 )
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    966       (23,891 )     55,617       (28,530 )
 
                       
Net loss
    (41,267 )     (159,714 )     (123,054 )     (162,702 )
Preferred stock dividends and premium accretion
    1,289       835       4,702       2,506  
Income allocated to participating securities
                       
 
                       
Net loss available to common stockholders
  $ (42,556 )   $ (160,549 )   $ (127,756 )   $ (165,208 )
 
                       
Basic earnings per share
  $ (1.52 )   $ (5.76 )   $ (4.57 )   $ (5.93 )
 
                       
Diluted earnings per share
  $ (1.52 )   $ (5.76 )   $ (4.57 )   $ (5.93 )
 
                       
Cash dividends declared per common share
  $     $     $     $ 0.26  
 
                       
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

PAGE 2


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
                                                                 
                                    Retained     Accumulated                
                    Additional             Earnings     Other             Total  
    Preferred     Common     Paid in             (Accumulated     Comprehensive     Treasury     Stockholders’  
    Stock     Stock     Capital     Warrant     Deficit)     Loss     Stock     Equity  
Balance, December 31, 2007
  $     $ 293     $ 300,762     $     $ 102,762     $ (13,917 )   $ (14,736 )   $ 375,164  
Cash dividends declared ($145.3125 per share) on Series A preferred stock
                            (2,506 )                 (2,506 )
Cash dividends declared ($0.26 per share) on common stock
                            (7,404 )                 (7,404 )
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of 16,500 stock options, net of tax benefit
                178                               178  
Issuance of 226,324 shares restricted stock
          2       (2 )                              
Stock-based compensation expense
                2,283                               2,283  
Comprehensive loss
                                                               
Net loss
                            (162,702 )                 (162,702 )
Prior service cost, net of income taxes
                                  (449 )           (449 )
Net increase in fair value of securities classified as available- for-sale, net of income taxes and reclassification adjustments
                                  2,673             2,673  
 
                                                             
Total comprehensive loss
                                                            (160,478 )
 
                                                             
 
                                               
Balance, September 30, 2008
  $     $ 295     $ 303,221     $     $ (69,850 )   $ (11,693 )   $ (14,736 )   $ 207,237  
 
                                               
Balance, December 31, 2008
  $ 1     $ 296     $ 383,491     $ 5,229     $ (66,325 )   $ (2,122 )   $ (14,736 )   $ 305,834  
Cash dividends declared ($48.4375 per share) on Series A preferred stock
                            (836 )                 (836 )
Cash dividends declared ($9.72 per share) on Series T preferred stock
                            (824 )                 (824 )
Issuance of 19,965 shares of common stock to employee stock purchase plan
                14                               14  
Issuance of 166,568 shares of common stock to directors’ deferred compensation plan
          2       113                               115  
Issuance of 334,882 shares of restricted stock
          3       (3 )                              
Accreted discount on Series T preferred stock
                687             (687 )                  
Stock-based compensation expense
                917                               917  
Repurchase of 10,695 shares of common stock under benefit plan
                                        (17 )     (17 )
Comprehensive loss
                                                               
Net loss
                            (123,054 )                 (123,054 )
Prior service cost including income taxes adjustment
                                  (201 )           (201 )
Income taxes adjustment on decrease in value of projected benefit obligation
                                  (151 )           (151 )
Net decrease in fair value of securities classified as available- for-sale including income taxes adjustment
                                  (1,558 )           (1,558 )
 
                                                             
Total comprehensive loss
                                                            (124,964 )
 
                                                             
 
                                               
Balance, September 30, 2009
  $ 1     $ 301     $ 385,219     $ 5,229     $ (191,726 )   $ (4,032 )   $ (14,753 )   $ 180,239  
 
                                               
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

PAGE 3


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands)
                 
    2009     2008  
Cash flows from operating activities
               
Net loss
  $ (123,054 )   $ (162,702 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities
               
Depreciation
    3,096       3,107  
Provision for loan losses
    69,700       51,765  
Amortization of core deposit and other intangibles
    1,115       630  
Goodwill impairment charge
          80,000  
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities, net
    389       431  
Realized (gain) loss on sale of securities, net
    (4,637 )     16,596  
Impairment loss on securities
    740       65,387  
Net loss on sales of loans
          75  
Gain on sale of property
          (15,196 )
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
          7,121  
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
    (1,332 )     (2,634 )
Deferred income taxes
    48,706       (14,259 )
Loss on disposition of foreclosed properties, net
    178       222  
Valuation loss on foreclosed properties
    2,569        
Amortization of deferred stock based compensation
    917       2,283  
Change in other assets
    29,517       (16,774 )
Change in other liabilities
    (2,471 )     (436 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    25,433       15,616  
 
               
Cash flows from investing activities
               
Sales of securities available-for-sale
    573,741       108,770  
Sales of securities held-to-maturity
    27,856       4,443  
Redemption of Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
    4,046       1,000  
Maturities of securities available-for-sale
    1,007,865       107,585  
Principal payments on securities available-for-sale
    49,537       42,496  
Principal payments on securities held-to-maturity
    2,468       2,430  
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
    (1,621,933 )     (244,043 )
Purchases of Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
          (4,535 )
Loan originations and principal collections, net
    11,698       (68,969 )
Sale of mortgage loans
          5,789  
Proceeds from sale of property
          18,259  
Proceeds from disposition of foreclosed properties
    1,989       244  
Liquidation of bank-owned life insurance
    86,008        
Additions to property and equipment
    (5,372 )     (2,694 )
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    137,903       (29,225 )
 
               
Cash flows from financing activities
               
Net increase in deposits
    142,587       55,185  
Proceeds from borrowings
          234,600  
Repayments on borrowings
    (40,000 )     (167,075 )
Preferred cash dividends paid
    (1,660 )     (2,506 )
Common cash dividends paid
          (11,076 )
Change in federal funds purchased, FRB discount window advances, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
          (66,750 )
Repurchase of common stock under stock and incentive plan
    (17 )      
Proceeds from issuance of common under stock and incentive plan
    129       175  
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    101,039       42,553  
 
           
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    264,375       28,944  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    63,065       84,499  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 327,440     $ 113,443  
 
           
Supplemental disclosures
               
Cash paid during period for:
               
Interest
  $ 61,237     $ 78,685  
Income taxes
    1,842       2,700  
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

PAGE 4


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION
     The consolidated financial statements of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) included herein are unaudited; however, such statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation for the interim periods. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
     The annualized results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year ending December 31, 2009. Certain items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income.
NOTE 2 — FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT
     The Company’s credit agreements with a correspondent bank at September 30, 2009 included a revolving line of credit and term note. The Company was in violation of the financial covenants contained in the revolving line of credit and term note. The Company also did not make a required principal payment on the term note due on July 1, 2009 and did not pay all of the aggregate outstanding principal on the revolving line of credit that matured July 3, 2009. On July 8, 2009, the lender advised the Company that the non-compliance and failure to make the principal payments constitute events of default. See Note 15 — Credit Agreements.
     On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement (“Forbearance Agreement”) with its lender that provides for a forbearance period through March 31, 2010, during which time the Company will continue to pursue completion of its previously disclosed capital plan. Management believes that the Forbearance Agreement provides the Company sufficient time to complete all major elements of the capital plan; however there can be no assurance that any or all major elements of the capital plan will be completed in a timely manner or at all. During the forbearance period, the Company is not obligated to make interest and principal payments in excess of funds held in a deposit security account (which will be funded with $325,000), and while retaining all rights and remedies under the credit agreements, the lender has agreed not to demand payment of amounts due or begin foreclosure proceedings in respect of the collateral, which consists primarily of all the stock of the Company’s principal subsidiary, Midwest Bank and Trust Company, and has agreed to forbear from exercising the rights and remedies available to it in respect of existing defaults and future compliance with certain covenants through March 31, 2010. As part of the Forbearance Agreement, the Company entered into a tax refund security agreement under which it agreed to deliver to the lender the expected proceeds to be received in connection with an outstanding Federal income tax refund in the approximate amount of $2.1 million. These proceeds, when received, will be placed in the deposit security account, and will be available for interest and principal payments. The Forbearance Agreement may terminate prior to March 31, 2010 if the Company defaults under any of its representations, warranties or obligations contained in either the Forbearance Agreement or credit agreements, or the Bank becomes subject to receivership by the FDIC or the Company becomes subject to other bankruptcy or insolvency type proceeding.
     Upon the expiration of the forbearance period, the principal and interest payments that were due under the revolving line of credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers, at the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into will once again become due and payable, along with such other amounts as may have become due during the forbearance period. Absent successful completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would not be able to meet any demands for payment of amounts then due at the expiration of the forbearance period. If the Company is unable to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources of financing on acceptable terms, it may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.

PAGE 5


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
NOTE 3 — REGULATORY ACTIONS
     The Bank’s primary regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, have recently completed a safety and soundness examination of the Bank. As a result of that examination, the Company expects that the Federal Reserve Bank and the Division of Banking will request that the Bank enter into a formal supervisory action requiring it to take certain steps intended to improve its overall condition. Such a supervisory action could require the Bank, among other things, to: implement the previously disclosed capital plan to strengthen the Bank’s capital position; develop a plan to improve the quality of the Bank’s loan portfolio by charging off loans and reducing its position in assets classified as “substandard;” develop and implement a plan to enhance the Bank’s liquidity position; and enhance the Bank’s loan underwriting and workout remediation teams. The final supervisory action may contain other conditions and targeted time frames as specified by the regulators.
     The Company believes that the successful completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan will enable the Bank to meet the requirements of any formal supervisory action with the regulators and will ensure that the Bank is able to comply with applicable bank regulations. However, the successful completion of all or any portion of the capital plan is not assured and if the Company or the Bank is unable to comply with the terms of the anticipated supervisory action or any other applicable regulations, the Company and the Bank could become subject to additional, heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our regulators were to take such additional actions, the Company and the Bank could become subject to various requirements limiting the ability to develop new business lines, mandating additional capital, and/or requiring the sale of certain assets and liabilities. Failure of the Company to meet these conditions could lead to further enforcement action on behalf of the regulators. The terms of any such additional regulatory actions, orders or agreements could have a materially adverse effect on the business of the Bank and the Company.
NOTE 4 — NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
     The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM (“Codification” or “ASC”) as the single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities (ASC 105). Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. Following the Codification, the Board will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”), which will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification.
     GAAP is not intended to be changed as a result of the FASB’s Codification project, but it will change the way the guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes will have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their accounting policies for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has implemented the Codification in this quarterly report by providing references to the Codification topics.

PAGE 6


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     In December 2007, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for business combinations (ASC 805), which modifies the accounting for business combinations and requires, with limited exceptions, the acquirer in a business combination to recognize all of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree at the acquisition-date, at fair value. This guidance also requires certain contingent assets and liabilities acquired as well as contingent consideration to be recognized at fair value. In addition, this guidance requires payments to third parties for consulting, legal, audit, and similar services associated with an acquisition to be recognized as expenses when incurred rather than capitalized as part of the cost of the acquisition. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or consolidated financial position.
     In June 2008, the FASB provided guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock (ASC 815-40-15). This guidance applies to any freestanding financial instrument or embedded feature that has all of the characteristics of a derivative or freestanding instrument that is potentially settled in an entity’s own stock (with the exception of share-based payment awards within the scope of the authoritative guidance for stock compensation (ASC 718)). To meet the definition of “indexed to own stock,” an instrument’s contingent exercise provisions must not be based on (a) an observable market, other than the market for the issuer’s stock (if applicable), or (b) an observable index, other than an index calculated or measured solely by reference to the issuer’s own operations, and the variables that could affect the settlement amount must be inputs to the fair value of a “fixed-for-fixed” forward or option on equity shares. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or consolidated financial position.
     On June 16, 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities (ASC 260). This guidance addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Accordingly, the Company adopted the provisions of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 and computed earnings per share using the two-class method for all periods presented. Upon adoption, the Company retrospectively adjusted earnings per share data to conform to the provisions in this guidance.
     In December 2008, the FASB amended the authoritative guidance regarding disclosures by public entities about transfers of financial assets (ASC 860) and interests in variable interest entities (ASC 810), which requires additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets and the involvement with variable interest entities. These additional disclosures are intended to provide greater transparency about a transferor’s continuing involvement with transferred assets and variable interest entities. This guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or consolidated financial position.

PAGE 7


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     On April 9, 2009, the FASB amended the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures (ASC 820), which requires increased analysis and management judgment to estimate fair value if an entity determines that either the volume and/or level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased or price quotations or observable inputs are not associated with orderly transactions. Valuation techniques such as an income approach might be appropriate to supplement or replace a market approach in those circumstances. This guidance requires entities to disclose in interim and annual periods the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value along with any changes in valuation techniques and related inputs during the period. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company included these new disclosures beginning April 1, 2009. See Note 10 — Fair Value for more information.
     On April 9, 2009, the FASB amended the authoritative guidance for interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments (ASC 825), which relates to fair value disclosures in public entity financial statements for financial instruments. This guidance increases the frequency of fair value disclosures from annual only to quarterly. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or consolidated financial position, but enhanced required disclosures. Accordingly, the Company included these new disclosures beginning April 1, 2009. See Note 10 — Fair Value for more information.
     On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued new authoritative guidance that revises the recognition and reporting requirements for other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities (ASC 320). This guidance eliminates the “ability and intent to hold” provision for debt securities and impairment is considered to be other than temporary if a company (i) intends to sell the security, (ii) more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovering its cost, or (iii) does not expect to recover the security’s entire amortized cost. This guidance also eliminates the “probability” standard relating to the collectibility of cash flows and impairment is considered to be other than temporary if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost (credit loss). Other-than-temporary losses also need to be separated between the amount related to credit loss (which is recognized in current earnings) and the amount related to all other factors (which is recognized in other comprehensive income). This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or consolidated financial position.
     In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance establishing principles and requirements for subsequent events (ASC 855). This guidance establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This guidance is based on the same principles as those that currently exist in the auditing standards. An entity must disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued or available to be issued. This guidance also requires disclosure of subsequent events to keep the financial statements from being misleading. This guidance is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on June 30, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or consolidated financial position.
     In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” This guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, introduces the concept of a “participating interest,” which will limit the circumstances where the transfer of a portion of a financial asset will qualify as a sale, assuming all other derecognition criteria are met, it clarifies and amends the derecognition criteria for determining whether a transfer qualifies for sale accounting, and requires additional disclosures. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 166 on January 1, 2010 will have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or consolidated financial position. This authoritative guidance has not yet been incorporated within the FASB’s Codification.

PAGE 8


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),” which eliminates the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. If an enterprise is required to consolidate an entity as a result of the initial application of this standard, it should describe the transition method(s) applied and shall disclose the amount and classification in its statement of financial position of the consolidated assets or liabilities by the transition method(s) applied. If an enterprise is required to deconsolidate an entity as a result of the initial application of this standard, it should disclose the amount of any cumulative effect adjustment related to deconsolidation separately from any cumulative effect adjustment related to consolidation of entities. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 167 on January 1, 2010 will have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or consolidated financial position. This authoritative guidance has not yet been incorporated within the FASB’s Codification.
NOTE 5 — SECURITIES
     The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity are as follows:
                                 
    September 30, 2009  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized        
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
    (In thousands)  
Securities available-for-sale
                               
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
  $ 451,785     $ 8     $ (1 )   $ 451,792  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    212       5             217  
Mortgage-backed securities:
                               
U.S. government agencies — residential (1)
    147,043       513       (553 )     147,003  
U.S. government-sponsored entities — residential (2)
    1,783       13             1,796  
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities (3)
    2,749       1,270       (148 )     3,871  
Corporate and other debt securities
    14,979             (4,115 )     10,864  
 
                       
Total securities available-for-sale
  $ 618,551     $ 1,809     $ (4,817 )   $ 615,543  
 
                       
Total securities held-to-maturity
  $     $     $     $  
 
                       
 
(1)   Includes obligations of the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”).
 
(2)   Includes obligations of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”).
 
(3)   Includes issues from Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and FHLMC.

PAGE 9


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
                                 
    December 31, 2008  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized        
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
    (In thousands)  
Securities available-for-sale
                               
Obligations of U.S. Treasury and U.S. government-sponsored entities (1)
  $ 263,483     $ 1,952     $     $ 265,435  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    57,309       241       (886 )     56,664  
Mortgage-backed securities (1)(2)
    281,592       3,363       (1,276 )     283,679  
Equity securities (3)
    2,749             (1,819 )     930  
Corporate and other debt securities
    19,176             (3,935 )     15,241  
 
                       
Total securities available-for-sale
  $ 624,309     $ 5,556     $ (7,916 )   $ 621,949  
 
                       
Securities held-to-maturity
                               
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
  $ 1,251     $ 12     $     $ 1,263  
Mortgage-backed securities (1)(2)
    29,016       138       (30 )     29,124  
 
                       
Total securities held-to-maturity
  $ 30,267     $ 150     $ (30 )   $ 30,387  
 
                       
 
(1)   Includes obligations of the FHLMC and FNMA.
 
(2)   Includes obligations of GNMA.
 
(3)   Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
     During the second quarter of 2009, the Company repositioned its securities portfolio to lower capital requirements associated with higher risk-weighted assets, restructure expected cash flows, reduce credit risk, and enhance the Bank’s asset sensitivity. The Company sold $538.1 million of its securities portfolio with an average yield of 3.94% and average life of slightly over two years, including $27.7 million of securities classified as held-to-maturity. The securities sold consisted of U.S. government-sponsored entities debentures, mortgage-backed securities, and municipal bonds. These securities were sold in the open market at a net gain of $4.3 million; $117,000 of this gain was related to securities classified as held-to-maturity. The Company purchased $571.0 million of U.S. Treasury bills and Government National Mortgage Association mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on these securities is 0.43% with an average life of less than six months.
     As of June 30, 2009, the Company still held $27.6 million in five securities, including municipal bonds and U.S. government-sponsored entities mortgage-backed securities, that were identified for sale under this portfolio repositioning program. Consistent with that program and the Company’s stated intent to sell these securities, the Company recognized a $740,000 other-than-temporary impairment charge on June 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, the Company continued to hold two of the five securities with balances totaling $2.0 million, which included a municipal bond and a mortgage-backed security of a U.S. government-sponsored entity that were identified for sale under this portfolio repositioning program, which were not impaired as of that date.

PAGE 10


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
          The following is a summary of the fair value of securities held-to-maturity and available-for-sale with unrealized losses and an aging of those unrealized losses:
                                                 
    September 30, 2009  
    Less Than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
    (In thousands)  
Securities available-for-sale:
                                               
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
  $ 49,997     $ (1 )   $     $     $ 49,997     $ (1 )
Mortgage-backed securities:
                                               
U.S. government agencies — residential (1)
    51,656       (553 )                 51,656       (553 )
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities (2)
    831       (148 )                 831       (148 )
Corporate and other debt securities
                10,864       (4,115 )     10,864       (4,115 )
 
                                   
Total securities available-for-sale
    102,484       (702 )     10,864       (4,115 )     113,348       (4,817 )
 
                                   
Total temporarily impaired securities
  $ 102,484     $ (702 )   $ 10,864     $ (4,115 )   $ 113,348     $ (4,817 )
 
                                   
 
(1)   Includes obligations of GNMA.
 
(2)   Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
                                                 
                    December 31, 2008        
    Less Than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
    (In thousands)  
Securities available-for-sale
                                               
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
  $ 34,293     $ (886 )   $     $     $ 34,293     $ (886 )
Mortgage-backed securities U.S. government-sponsored entities(1)
    60,117       (198 )     39,778       (1,078 )     99,895       (1,276 )
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities (2)
    899       (1,819 )                 899       (1,819 )
Corporate and other debt securities
    3,746       (287 )     11,495       (3,648 )     15,241       (3,935 )
 
                                   
Total securities available-for-sale
    99,055       (3,190 )     51,273       (4,726 )     150,328       (7,916 )
 
                                   
Securities held-to-maturity
                                               
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    250                         250        
Mortgage-backed securities U.S. government-sponsored entities(1)
                20,521       (30 )     20,521       (30 )
 
                                   
Total securities held-to-maturity
    250             20,521       (30 )     20,771       (30 )
 
                                   
Total temporarily impaired securities
  $ 99,305     $ (3,190 )   $ 71,794     $ (4,756 )   $ 171,099     $ (7,946 )
 
                                   
 
(1)   Includes obligations of GNMA.
 
(2)   Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
          The unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities is included in other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheets. Management has concluded that no individual unrealized loss as of September 30, 2009, identified in the preceding table, represents other-than-temporary impairment. The Company does not intend to sell nor would it be required to sell the securities shown in the table with unrealized losses before recovering their amortized cost.

PAGE 11


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
NOTE 6 — LOANS
          Major classifications of loans (source of repayment basis) are summarized as follows:
                                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
            % of Gross             % of Gross  
    Amount     Loans     Amount     Loans  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Commercial
  $ 1,045,533       42.6 %   $ 1,090,078       43.3 %
Construction
    324,074       13.2       366,178       14.6  
Commercial real estate
    744,464       30.3       729,729       29.1  
Home equity
    227,966       9.3       194,673       7.8  
Other consumer
    5,583       0.2       6,332       0.3  
Residential mortgage
    107,124       4.4       123,161       4.9  
 
                       
Total loans, gross
    2,454,744       100.0 %     2,510,151       100.0 %
 
                           
Net deferred fees
    (643 )             (392 )        
 
                           
Total loans, net
  $ 2,454,101             $ 2,509,759          
 
                           
NOTE 7 — ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
          Following is a summary of activity in the allowance for loan losses:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Balance, at beginning of period
  $ 63,893     $ 22,606     $ 44,432     $ 26,748  
Provision charged to operations
    36,700       41,950       69,700       51,765  
Loans charged off
    (17,723 )     (25,224 )     (32,268 )     (40,472 )
Recoveries
    636       96       1,642       1,387  
 
                       
Net loans charged off
    (17,087 )     (25,128 )     (30,626 )     (39,085 )
 
                       
Balance, at end of period
  $ 83,506     $ 39,428     $ 83,506     $ 39,428  
 
                       
          The provision for credit losses reflected on the consolidated statements of operations includes the provision for loan losses and the provision for unfunded commitment losses as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Provision for loan losses
  $ 36,700     $ 41,950     $ 69,700     $ 51,765  
Provision for unfunded commitment losses
    750       250       1,753       602  
 
                       
Provision for credit losses
  $ 37,450     $ 42,200     $ 71,453     $ 52,367  
 
                       
          A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans. Information with respect to impaired loans and the amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated thereto is as follows:
         
    September 30, 2009  
    (In thousands)  
Impaired loans for which no allowance for loan losses is allocated
  $ 52,519  
Impaired loans with an allocation of the allowance for loan losses
    139,141  
 
     
Total impaired loans
  $ 191,660  
 
     
Allowance for loan losses allocated to impaired loans
  $ 38,779  
 
     
         
    Nine Months Ended
    September 30, 2009
Average impaired loans
  $ 103,051  
Interest income recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis
    443  

PAGE 12


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
NOTE 8 — GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES
          The following table presents the carrying amount and accumulated amortization of intangible assets (in thousands):
                                                 
    September 30, 2009     December 31, 2008  
    Gross Carrying     Accumulated     Net Carrying     Gross Carrying     Accumulated     Net Carrying  
    Amount     Amortization     Amount     Amount     Amortization     Amount  
Amortized intangible assets:
                                               
Core deposit and other intangibles
  $ 21,091     $ (8,127 )   $ 12,964     $ 21,091     $ (6,408 )   $ 14,683  
     The amortization of intangible assets was $573,000 and $1.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. At September 30, 2009, the projected amortization of intangible assets for the years ending December 31, 2009 through 2013 and thereafter is as follows (in thousands):
         
2009
  $ 2,292  
2010
    2,222  
2011
    1,918  
2012
    1,803  
2013
    1,696  
Thereafter
    4,752  
The weighted average remaining amortization period for the core deposit intangibles is approximately seven years as of September 30, 2009.
          The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and other intangibles during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
                 
            Core Deposit  
            and Other  
    Goodwill     Intangibles  
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 78,862     $ 14,683  
Amortization
          (1,719 )
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 78,862     $ 12,964  
 
           
          Consistent with established policy, an annual review for goodwill impairment as of September 30, 2009 was conducted with the assistance of a nationally recognized third party valuation specialist. Based upon that review, the Company determined that the $78.9 million goodwill recorded on the September 30, 2009 balance sheet was not impaired.

PAGE 13


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
NOTE 9 — OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK
          The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet financing needs of customers. Since many commitments to extend credit expire without being used, the amounts below do not necessarily represent future cash commitments. These financial instruments include lines of credit, letters of credit, and commitments to extend credit. These are summarized as follows as of September 30, 2009:
                                         
    Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period  
    Within                     After        
    1 Year     1-3 Years     4-5 Years     5 Years     Total  
    (In thousands)  
Lines of Credit:
                                       
Commercial real estate
  $ 81,610     $ 5,632     $ 5,238     $     $ 92,480  
Home equity
    31,528       23,031       27,983       31,051       113,593  
Consumer
                      1,986       1,986  
Commercial
    207,627       3,016       2,655       4,740       218,038  
Letters of credit
    43,836       3,220       2,828             49,884  
Commitments to extend credit
    12,922                         12,922  
 
                             
Total commitments
  $ 377,523     $ 34,899     $ 38,704     $ 37,777     $ 488,903  
 
                             
          At September 30, 2009, commitments to extend credit included $12.9 million of fixed rate loan commitments. These commitments are due to expire within 30 to 90 days of issuance and have rates ranging from 6.25% to 7.25%. Substantially all of the unused lines of credit are at adjustable rates of interest.
          The Company had a reserve for losses on unfunded commitments of $2.1 million at September 30, 2009, up from $1.1 million at December 31, 2008 and $793,000 at September 30, 2008.
          During the second quarter of 2009, the Company began deferring payment of dividends on the $84.8 million of Series T cumulative preferred stock and deferring interest payments on $60.8 million of its junior subordinated debentures as permitted by the terms of such debentures. The deferred interest payments on the Company’s junior subordinated debentures are accrued in the period in which the payments would have been made which were $1.1 million through September 30, 2009.. The dividends on the Series T cumulative preferred stock are recorded only when declared. The cumulative amount of dividends not declared was $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
          In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, any liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

PAGE 14


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
NOTE 10 — FAIR VALUE
          The Company adopted the authoritative guidance for fair value measurement (ASC 820) on January 1, 2008. This guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants on the measurement date. This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
    Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
 
    Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
 
    Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
          The Company’s available-for-sale investment securities are the only financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis; it does not hold any financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of available-for-sale securities are determined by obtaining either quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on these securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. If quoted prices or matrix pricing are not available, the fair value is determined by an adjusted price for similar securities including unobservable inputs.

PAGE 15


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The fair values of the available-for-sale securities were measured at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 using the following:
                                 
            Quoted Prices or     Significant     Significant  
            Identical Assets in     Other Observable     Unobservable  
    Total     Active Markets     Inputs     Inputs  
    Fair Value     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
    (In thousands)  
Assets at September 30, 2009:
                               
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury
  $ 451,792     $     $ 451,792     $  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    217             217        
Mortgage-backed securities:
                               
U.S. government agencies — residential (1)
    147,003             147,003        
U.S. government-sponsored entities — residential (2)
    1,796             1,796        
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities (3)
    3,871       3,871              
Corporate and other debt securities
    10,864             3,538       7,326  
 
                       
Available-for-sale securities
  $ 615,543     $ 3,871     $ 604,346     $ 7,326  
 
                       
 
                               
Assets at December 31, 2008:
                               
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and of U.S. government-sponsored entities (4)
  $ 265,435     $     $ 265,435     $  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    56,664             56,664        
Mortgage-backed securities (1)(4)
    283,679             283,679        
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities (3)
    930       930              
Corporate and other debt securities
    15,241             6,808       8,433  
 
                       
Available-for-sale securities
  $ 621,949     $ 930     $ 612,586     $ 8,433  
 
                       
 
(1)   Includes obligations of GNMA.
 
(2)   Includes obligations of FHLMC.
 
(3)   Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
 
(4)   Includes obligations of FHLMC and FNMA.
     The following is a summary of changes in the fair value of other bonds that were measured using significant unobservable inputs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
                                 
    Three months ended     Nine months ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
 
                               
Beginning balance
  $ 8,881     $ 9,286     $ 8,433     $ 10,479  
Paydowns received
    (72 )           (167 )      
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
                               
Included in earnings
                       
Included in other comprehensive income
    (1,483 )     (6,436 )     (940 )     (7,629 )
 
                       
Ending balance
  $ 7,326     $ 2,850     $ 7,326     $ 2,850  
 
                       

PAGE 16


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     Certain of the Company’s impaired loans are measured using the fair value of the underlying collateral on a non-recurring basis. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with the authoritative guidance for loan impairments (ASC 310-10-35). At September 30, 2009, $139.1 million of the loans considered impaired were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral compared to $41.3 million at December 31, 2008. The fair value of the collateral is determined by obtaining an observable market price or by obtaining an appraised value with management applying selling and other discounts to the underlying collateral value. If a current appraised value is not available, the fair value of the impaired loan is determined by an adjusted appraised value including unobservable cash flows.
     The fair values of the impaired loans based on the fair value of the collateral were measured at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 using the following:
                                 
            Quoted Prices or   Significant   Significant
            Identical Assets in   Other Observable   Unobservable
    Total   Active Markets   Inputs   Inputs
    Fair Value   (Level 1)   (Level 2)   (Level 3)
    (In thousands)
Assets at September 30, 2009:
                               
Impaired loans
  $ 100,362     $     $     $ 100,362  
Assets at December 31, 2008:
                               
Impaired loans
  $ 37,098     $     $     $ 37,098  
     Loans which are measured for impairment using the fair value of collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a gross carrying amount of $139.1 million, with an associated valuation allowance of $38.8 million for a fair value of $100.4 million at September 30, 2009. At December 31, 2008, loans measured for impairment using the fair value of collateral had a carrying amount of $41.3 million, with an associated valuation allowance of $4.2 million for a fair value of $37.1 million. The provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, included $48.7 million of specific allowance allocations for impaired loans.
     The methods and assumptions used to determine fair values for each class of financial instrument are presented below.

PAGE 17


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows:
                                 
    September 30, 2009   December 31, 2008
    Carrying   Estimated   Carrying   Estimated
    Amount   Fair Value   Amount   Fair Value
    (In thousands)
Financial assets
                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 327,440     $ 327,440     $ 63,065     $ 63,065  
Securities available-for-sale
    615,543       615,543       621,949       621,949  
Securities held-to-maturity
                30,267       30,387  
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
    27,652       27,652       31,698       31,698  
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
    2,370,595       2,283,820       2,465,327       2,485,011  
Accrued interest receivable
    9,506       9,506       13,302       13,302  
Financial liabilities
                               
Deposits
                               
Noninterest-bearing
    330,901       330,901       334,495       334,495  
Interest-bearing
    2,224,288       2,238,968       2,078,296       2,008,100  
Revolving note payable
    8,600       8,357       8,600       8,600  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    297,650       334,776       297,650       369,376  
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
    340,000       371,126       380,000       410,992  
Junior subordinated debentures
    60,828       26,510       60,791       56,572  
Subordinated debt
    15,000       9,904       15,000       15,000  
Term note payable
    55,000       53,007       55,000       55,000  
Accrued interest payable
    7,128       7,128       8,553       8,553  
     The remaining other assets and liabilities of the Company are not considered financial instruments and are not included in the above disclosures. The fair value adjustment of off-balance-sheet items including loan commitments was not considered material due to their short-term nature and variable rates of interest.
     The methods and assumptions used to determine fair values for each class of financial instrument are presented below.
     A test for goodwill impairment was conducted as of September 30, 2009 with the assistance of a nationally recognized third party valuation specialist. In Step 2 of that test, the Company estimated the fair value of assets and liabilities in the same manner as if a purchase of the reporting unit was taking place from a market participant perspective. Management worked closely with the third party valuation specialist throughout the valuation process, provided necessary information and reviewed and approved the methodologies, assumptions and conclusions.
     The fair value estimation methodology selected for our most significant assets and liabilities was based on our observations and knowledge of methodologies typically and currently utilized by market participants, the structure and characteristics of the asset and liability in terms of cash flows and collateral, and the availability and reliability of significant inputs required for a selected methodology and comparative data to evaluate the outcomes.

PAGE 18


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The carrying amount is equivalent to the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, and accrued interest receivable and payable. The fair values of securities are determined by obtaining either quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing. The Company selected the income approach for performing loans, retail certificates of deposit and borrowings. The Company estimated discounted fair values separately for nonaccrual loans and loans 60-89 days past due. The income approach was deemed appropriate for the assets and liabilities noted above due to the limited current comparable market transaction data available.
     Net loans were $2.4 billion or 67% of Company assets as of September 30, 2009. The estimated fair value of net loans was $86.8 million or 3.7% below book value. In computing this estimated fair value, performing loans were broken into fixed and variable components, floors and collateral coverage ratios were considered, and appropriate comparable market discount rates were used to compute fair values using a discounted cash flow approach. A 40% discount was applied to nonaccrual loans based upon recent Company charge-off experience and a 10% discount was applied to loans 60-89 days past due.
     There is no readily available market for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments. Accordingly, fair values are based on various factors relative to expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics, and other factors. The assumptions and estimates used in the fair value determination process are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and significant judgment and, therefore, fair values cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimated values. Further discussion of material assumptions used in the fair value estimates and the effect of certain changes in material assumptions on those values is included in Note 8 — Goodwill and Intangibles.

PAGE 19


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
NOTE 11 — STOCK COMPENSATION AND RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
     Under the Company’s Stock and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), officers, directors, and key employees may be granted incentive stock options to purchase the Company’s common stock at no less than 100% of the market price on the date the option is granted. Options can be granted to become exercisable immediately or after a specified vesting period or may be issued subject to performance targets. In all cases, the options have a maximum term of ten years. The Plan also permits the issuance of nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and restricted stock units. The Plan authorizes a total of 3,900,000 shares for issuance. There are 1,636,778 shares remaining for issuance under the Plan at September 30, 2009. It is the Company’s policy to issue new shares of its common stock in conjunction with the exercise of stock options or grants of restricted stock.
     No employee stock options were exercised during the first nine months of 2009. Total employee stock options outstanding at September 30, 2009 were 548,581 with exercise prices ranging between $1.15 and $22.03, with a weighted average exercise price of $8.11, and expiration dates between 2010 and 2019. During the first nine months of 2009, 288,693 stock options were granted with an exercise price of $1.15, which will vest over a three-year service period.
     Information about option grants follows:
                         
            Weighted Average     Weighted Average  
    Number of     Exercise Price     Grant- Date Fair  
    Options     Per Share     Value Per Share  
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
    379,371     $ 14.28     $ 4.80  
Granted
    288,693       1.15       0.66  
Exercised
                 
Forfeited
    (119,483 )     10.88       3.38  
 
                     
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
    548,581       8.11       2.93  
 
                     
     Employee compensation expense for stock options previously granted was recorded in the consolidated statement of operations based on the grant’s vesting schedule. Forfeitures of stock option grants are estimated for those stock options where the requisite service is not expected to be rendered. The grant-date fair value for each grant was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following table reflects the assumptions used to determine the grant-date fair value stock options granted in 2009.
         
    2009
Fair value
  $ 0.66  
Risk-free interest rate
    2.78 %
Expected option life
  7.5 years
Expected stock price volatility
    52.54 %
     Employee compensation expense related to stock options was $14,000 and $42,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to $5,000 and $16,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The total compensation cost related to nonvested stock options not yet recognized was $132,000 at September 30, 2009 and the weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be recognized is 28 months.

PAGE 20


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     Under the Plan, officers, directors, and key employees may also be granted awards of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. Holders of restricted shares are entitled to receive non-forfeitable cash dividends paid to the Company’s common stockholders and have the right to vote the restricted shares prior to vesting. The existing restricted share grants vest over various time periods not exceeding five years and some may be accelerated subject to achieving certain performance targets. Compensation expense for the restricted shares equals the market price of the related stock at the date of grant and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected vesting period. All restricted shares had a grant-date fair value equal to the market price of the underlying common stock at date of grant.
     For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized $156,000 and $876,000 in compensation expense related to the restricted stock grants compared to $688,000 and $2.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The total compensation cost related to nonvested restricted shares not yet recognized was $1.4 million at September 30, 2009 and the weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be recognized is 32 months.
     Information about restricted shares outstanding and activity follows:
                 
    Number of     Weighted Average  
    Restricted     Grant-Date Fair Value  
    Shares     Per Share  
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
    609,901     $ 16.42  
Granted
    334,882       1.22  
Vested
    (47,896 )     15.80  
Forfeited
    (210,951 )     17.70  
 
             
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
    685,936       8.64  
 
             
NOTE 12 — SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
     The Company and various members of senior management have entered into a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”). The SERP is an unfunded plan that provides for guaranteed payments, based on a percentage of the individual’s final salary, for 15 years after age 65. The benefit amount is reduced if the individual retires prior to age 65.
     Effective April 1, 2008, the SERP agreements with employees constituted a pension plan under the authoritative guidance for compensation — retirement plans (ASC 715). The objective of this guidance is to recognize the compensation cost of pension benefits (including prior service cost) over that employee’s approximate service period. Included in salaries and benefits expense in the statements of income was $319,000 and $956,000 of expense related to the SERP for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to $310,000 and $1.3 million, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The expense related to the SERP for the three months ended March 31, 2008 of $742,000 was calculated under the authoritative guidance for deferred compensation arrangements (ASC 710). The prior service cost amortization expense was $71,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The benefit obligation was $7.2 million and $6.4 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

PAGE 21


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The following is a summary of changes in the benefit obligation for the nine months ended September 30, 2009:
         
    September 30,  
    2009  
    (In thousands)  
 
       
Beginning balance
  $ 6,403  
Service cost
    618  
Interest cost
    267  
Distributions
    (75 )
 
     
Ending balance
  $ 7,213  
 
     
NOTE 13 — INCOME TAXES
     The difference between the provision for income taxes in the consolidated financial statements and amounts computed by applying the current federal statutory income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes is reconciled as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Income taxes computed at the statutory rate
  $ (14,105 )     35.0 %   $ (64,262 )     35.0 %   $ (23,603 )     35.0 %   $ (66,931 )     35.0 %
Tax-exempt interest income on securities and loans
    (47 )     0.1       (213 )     0.1       (449 )     0.7       (617 )     0.3  
General business credits
    (147 )     0.4       (168 )     0.1       (441 )     0.7       (445 )     0.2  
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit due to state operating loss
    (2,388 )     5.9       (2,137 )     1.2       (2,607 )     3.9       (2,898 )     1.5  
Life insurance cash surrender value increase, net of premiums
                (319 )     0.2       (466 )     0.7       (922 )     0.5  
Liquidation of bank-owned life insurance
                            6,924       (10.3 )            
Dividends received deduction
                (47 )                       (649 )     0.3  
Goodwill impairment
                28,000       (15.3 )                 28,000       (14.6 )
Valuation allowance
    17,397       (43.2 )     14,851       (8.1 )     75,259       (111.7 )     14,851       (7.8 )
Nondeductible costs and other, net
    256       (0.6 )     404       (0.2 )     1,000       (1.5 )     1,081       (0.5 )
 
                                               
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
  $ 966       (2.4 )%   $ (23,891 )     13.0 %   $ 55,617       (82.5 )%   $ (28,530 )     14.9 %
 
                                               
     The Company recognizes interest related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties, if any, in income tax expense.
     During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a tax expense of $966,000. This expense relates primarily to the adjustment made to the net deferred tax asset as a result of the reduced ability to use available tax planning strategies.
     During the second quarter of 2009, the Company liquidated its $85.8 million investment in bank owned life insurance in order to reduce the Company’s investment risk and the Bank’s regulatory capital requirement. The $16.3 million increase in cash surrender value of the policies since the time of purchase is treated as ordinary income for tax purposes. Additionally, a 10% IRS excise tax was incurred as a result of the liquidation. As a result, the Company recorded federal tax expense of $6.9 million and an additional state tax expense of $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2009 for this transaction.

PAGE 22


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     The Company increased the total valuation allowance by $16.9 million to $76.9 million against its existing net deferred tax assets during the quarter. The valuation allowance includes $1.6 million recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss fully offsetting deferred taxes which were established for securities available for sale and for the SERP program. The Company’s primary deferred tax assets relate to its allowance for loan losses, net operating losses (“NOL’s”) and impairment charges relating to FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock holdings. Under generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation allowance is required to be recognized if it is “more likely than not” that such deferred tax assets will not be realized. In making that determination, management is required to evaluate both positive and negative evidence including recent historical financial performance, forecasts of future income, tax planning strategies and assessments of the current and future economic and business conditions. The Company performs and updates this evaluation on a quarterly basis.
     In conducting its regular quarterly evaluation, the Company made a determination to maintain the valuation allowance as of September 30, 2009 based primarily upon the existence of a three year cumulative loss derived by combining the pre-tax income (loss) reported during the two most recent annual periods (calendar years ended 2007 and 2008) with management’s current projected results for the year ending 2009. This three year cumulative loss position is primarily attributable to significant provisions for loan losses incurred and currently forecasted during the three years ending 2009 and losses realized during 2008 on its FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock holdings. The Company’s current financial forecasts indicate that taxable income will be generated in the future. However, the existing deferred tax benefits may not be fully realized due to statutory limitations on their utilization based on the Company’s planned capital restructuring. The creation and subsequent addition to the valuation allowance, although it increased tax expense for the second and third quarters and similarly reduced tangible book values, did not have an effect on the Company’s cash flows. The remaining net deferred tax assets of $4.1 million are supported by available tax planning strategies.
     An Illinois Department of Revenue audit has commenced for the Company for the years 2006 and 2007. The Company has also been notified that Royal American Corporation will be audited by the IRS for the carryback of its separate company loss for 2006 to 2004. The Company is responsible for all taxes related to Royal American including periods prior to its acquisition. The Company does not anticipate any adjustments as a result of these audits that would result in significant change to its financial position. It is reasonably possible that the gross balance of unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next twelve months.
     Years that remain subject to examination include 2006 to present for federal, 2005 to present for Illinois, 2005 to present for Indiana, and 2005 to present for federal and Illinois for various acquired entities.

PAGE 23


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
NOTE 14 — EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands, except per share data)  
Net loss
  $ (41,267 )   $ (159,714 )   $ (123,054 )   $ (162,702 )
Less: Series A preferred stock dividends
          835       835       2,506  
Series T preferred stock dividends (1)
    1,060             3,180        
Series T preferred stock discount accretion
    229             687        
Income allocated to participating securities (2)
                       
 
                       
Loss available to common stockholders
  $ (42,556 )   $ (160,549 )   $ (127,756 )   $ (165,208 )
 
                       
Basic
                               
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    27,953       27,859       27,936       27,851  
 
                       
Basic earnings per share
  $ (1.52 )   $ (5.76 )   $ (4.57 )   $ (5.93 )
 
                       
Diluted
                               
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    27,953       27,859       27,936       27,851  
Dilutive effect of stock options (3)
                       
Dilutive effect of restricted stock (3)
                       
 
                       
Diluted average common shares
    27,953       27,859       27,936       27,851  
 
                       
Diluted earnings per share
  $ (1.52 )   $ (5.76 )   $ (4.57 )   $ (5.93 )
 
                       
 
(1)   Includes $824 in dividends declared in first quarter of 2009 and $1,060 and $2,661 in cumulative dividends not declared for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
 
(2)   No adjustment for unvested restricted shares was included in the computation of loss available to common stockholders for any period there was a loss. See Note 4 — New Accounting Pronouncements.
 
(3)   No shares of stock options or restricted stock were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for any period there was a loss.
     Options to purchase 548,581 shares at $8.11 were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 421,322 shares at $14.10 were not included for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock and the options were, therefore, anti-dilutive. The warrant to purchase 4,282,020 shares at an exercise price of $2.97 was not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the warrant’s exercise price was greater than the average market price of common stock and was, therefore, anti-dilutive. A total of 685,936 shares of restricted stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 615,637 shares of restricted stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 were not included in the computation of diluted shares because of the anti-dilutive effect. The shares that would be issued if the Series A noncumulative redeemable convertible perpetual preferred stock were converted are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 because of their anti-dilutive effect.

PAGE 24


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
NOTE 15 — CREDIT AGREEMENTS
     The Company’s credit agreements with a correspondent bank at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of a revolving line of credit, a term note, and a subordinated debenture in the amounts of $8.6 million, $55.0 million, and $15.0 million, respectively.
     The revolving line of credit had a maximum availability of $8.6 million, an outstanding balance of $8.6 million as of September 30, 2009, an interest rate at September 30, 2009 of one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis points with an interest rate floor of 7.25%, and matured on July 3, 2009. The term note had an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis points at September 30, 2009 and matures on September 28, 2010. The subordinated debt had an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 350 basis points at September 30, 2009, matures on March 31, 2018, and qualifies as Tier 2 capital.
     The revolving line of credit and term note included the following financial covenants at September 30, 2009: (1) Midwest Bank and Trust Company (the “Bank”) must not have nonperforming loans (loans on nonaccrual status and 90 days or more past due and troubled-debt restructured loans) in excess of 3.00% of total loans, (2) the Bank must report a quarterly profit, excluding charges related to acquisitions, and (3) the Bank must remain well capitalized. At September 30, 2009, the Company was in violation of financial convenants (the “Financial Covenant Defaults”).
     The Company did not make a required $5.0 million principal payment on the term note due on July 1, 2009 under the covenant waiver for the third quarter of 2008. On July 8, 2009, the lender advised the Company that such non-compliance constitutes a continuing event of default under the loan agreements (the “Contingent Waiver Default”). The Company’s decision not to make the $5.0 million principal payment, together with its previously announced decision to suspend the dividend on its Series A preferred stock and defer the dividends on its Series T preferred stock and interest payments on its trust preferred securities, were made in order to retain cash and preserve liquidity and capital at the holding company.
     The revolving line of credit matured on July 3, 2009, and the Company did not pay to the lender all of the aggregate outstanding principal on the revolving line of credit on such date. The failure to make such payment constitutes an additional event of default under the credit agreements (the “Payment Default”; the Contingent Wavier Default, the Financial Covenant Defaults and the Payment Default are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Existing Events of Default”).
     As a result of the occurrence and the continuance of the Existing Events of Default, the lender notified the Company that, as of July 8, 2009, the interest rate on the revolving line of credit increased to the then current default interest rate of 7.25%, which represents the current interest rate floor, and the interest rate under the term loan agreement increased to the default interest rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 455 basis points. The Company also did not make a required $5.0 million principal payment on the term note due on October 1, 2009 under the covenant waiver for the third quarter of 2008.

PAGE 25


Table of Contents

MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
     As a result, and as a result of the other Existing Events of Default, the lender possesses certain rights and remedies, including the ability to demand immediate payment of amounts due totaling $63.6 million plus accrued interest or foreclose on the collateral supporting the credit agreements, being 100% of the stock of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank.
     On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement with its lender that provides for a forbearance period through March 31, 2010. See Note 2 — Forbearance Agreement.
NOTE 16 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
     The Company has performed an evaluation of events that have occurred subsequent to September 30, 2009 and through November 9, 2009 (the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q). There have been no subsequent events that occurred during such period that would require disclosure in this Form 10-Q, other than those that are described in Note 2 — Forbearance Agreement, Note 3 — Regulatory Actions, and Note 15 — Credit Agreements, or would be required to be recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements as of or for the three- and nine- month periods ending September 30, 2009.

PAGE 26


Table of Contents

ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
      The following discussion and analysis is intended as a review of significant factors affecting the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods indicated. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto presented herein. In addition to historical information, the following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results could differ significantly from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors discussed in this report.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. By their nature, changes in these assumptions and estimates could significantly affect the Company’s financial position or results of operations. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Those critical accounting policies that are of particular significance to the Company are discussed in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-160985) filed with the SEC on October 26, 2009 under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.”
Recent Developments
     On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement (“Forbearance Agreement”) with its lender that provides for a forbearance period through March 31, 2010, during which time the Company will continue to pursue completion of its previously disclosed capital plan. Management believes that the Forbearance Agreement provides the Company sufficient time to complete all major elements of the capital plan; however there can be no assurance that any or all major elements of the capital plan will be completed in a timely manner or at all. During the forbearance period, the Company is not obligated to make interest and principal payments in excess of funds held in a deposit security account (which will be funded with $325,000), and while retaining all rights and remedies under the credit agreements, the lender has agreed not to demand payment of amounts due or begin foreclosure proceedings in respect of the collateral, which consists primarily of all the stock of the Company’s principal subsidiary, Midwest Bank and Trust Company, and has agreed to forbear from exercising the rights and remedies available to it in respect of existing defaults and future compliance with certain covenants through March 31, 2010. As part of the Forbearance Agreement, the Company entered into a tax refund security agreement under which it agreed to deliver to the lender the expected proceeds to be received in connection with an outstanding Federal income tax refund in the approximate amount of $2.1 million. These proceeds, when received, will be placed in the deposit security account, and will be available for interest and principal payments. The Forbearance Agreement may terminate prior to March 31, 2010 if the Company defaults under any of its representations, warranties or obligations contained in either the Forbearance Agreement or credit agreements, or the Bank becomes subject to receivership by the FDIC or the Company becomes subject to other bankruptcy or insolvency type proceeding.
     Upon the expiration of the forbearance period, the principal and interest payments that were due under the revolving line of credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers, at the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into will once again become due and payable, along with such other amounts as may have become due during the forbearance period. Absent successful completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would not be able to meet any demands for payment of amounts then due at the expiration of the forbearance period. If the Company is unable to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources of financing on acceptable terms, it may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.
     The Bank’s primary regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, have recently completed a safety and soundness examination of the Bank. As a result of that examination, the Company expects that the Federal Reserve Bank and the Division of Banking will request that the Bank enter into a formal supervisory action requiring it to take certain steps intended to improve its overall condition. Such a supervisory action could require the Bank,

PAGE 27


Table of Contents

among other things, to: implement the capital restoration plan described below to strengthen the Bank’s capital position; develop a plan to improve the quality of the Bank’s loan portfolio by charging off loans and reducing its position in assets classified as “substandard;” develop and implement a plan to enhance the Bank’s liquidity position; and enhance the Bank’s loan underwriting and workout remediation teams. The final supervisory action may contain other conditions and targeted time frames as specified by the regulators.
     The Company believes that the successful completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan will enable the Bank to meet the requirements of any formal supervisory action with the regulators and will ensure that the Bank is able to comply with applicable bank regulations. However, the successful completion of all or any portion of the capital plan is not assured and if the Company or the Bank is unable to comply with the terms of the anticipated supervisory action or any other applicable regulations, the Company and the Bank could become subject to additional, heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our regulators were to take such additional actions, the Company and the Bank could become subject to various requirements limiting the ability to develop new business lines, mandating additional capital, and/or requiring the sale of certain assets and liabilities. Failure of the Company to meet these conditions could lead to further enforcement action on behalf of the regulators. The terms of any such additional regulatory actions, orders or agreements could have a materially adverse effect on the business of the Bank and the Company.
     Brogan Ptacin and Kelly J. O’Keeffe, each an Executive Vice President of the Bank, resigned from the Bank effective August 14, 2009. Messrs. Ptacin and O’Keeffe’s responsibilities were assigned to other members of management.
     On July 28, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Bank and the Company accepted the resignation of three directors, reducing the Boards from eleven to eight members. On September 21, 2009, the Company announced the death of Director Thomas A. Rosenquist. The boards of the Company and the Bank now have seven members.
     On July 28, 2009, the Company announced that it had developed a detailed capital plan and timeline for execution (the “Capital Plan”). The Capital Plan was adopted in order to, among other things, improve the Company’s common equity capital and raise additional capital to enable it to better withstand and respond to adverse market conditions. Management has completed, or is in the process of completing, a number of steps as part of the Capital Plan, including:
  Cost reduction initiatives which will eliminate $14.6 million in expenses on an annualized basis when compared to either our 2008 expenses excluding the goodwill impairment and loss on extinguishment of debt or our 2nd quarter 2009 expenses similarly excluding the FDIC special assessment and severance expenses. This will be accomplished through a reduction in force of over 100 employees, which was completed by September 30, 2009, salary reductions for employees led by the Company’s top executives’ salaries of 7% to 10%, suspension of certain benefits, elimination of discretionary projects and initiatives and an increased focus on expense control;
  Retained independent consultants to refine credit loss projections through 2010;
  Broadened investment banking support to assist with the capital plan;
  Undertaking an offer to holders of the Company’s outstanding Depositary Shares, each representing 1/100th fractional interest in a share of the Company’s Series A noncumulative redeemable convertible perpetual preferred stock, to exchange their Depositary Shares for shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Exchange Offer”). On October 26, 2009, the Company amended its registration statement previously filed with the SEC in connection with the proposed Exchange Offer;
  Possible capital raising activities;

PAGE 28


Table of Contents

  Continued negotiations with the company’s primary lender to restructure $55.0 million senior debt and $15.0 million subordinated debt;
  Analyzed the ability to exchange $59.0 million of trust preferred securities into equity. We have been advised an exchange for equity cannot be facilitated for the collateral in a trust preferred pooled securitization as a consequence of the tax status of the trust prohibiting the ownership of an equity security; and
  Filed an initial application seeking an investment by the U.S. Treasury of up to approximately $137.9 million (based on June 30, 2009 risk weighted assets) pursuant to its Capital Assistance Program (“CAP”) that would be used to redeem the $84.8 million outstanding preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury under its Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”) in 2008. The Company would seek to convert the CAP preferred stock to common stock following issuance of the CAP preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury (subject to regulatory approval). A condition precedent to the redemption of the $84.8 million outstanding preferred stock issued under the CPP is the payment of the deferred dividends, which were $2.7 million thorugh September 30, 2009.
  The Company is in negotiations with the U.S. Treasury related to conversion of the $84.8 million outstanding preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury under its Capital Purchase Program in 2008, to common stock. Subsequent to filing its intitial application, the Company amended its application to reduce the amount of the requested investment to $84.8 million.
     The Company believes the successful completion of its Capital Plan would substantially improve its capital position; however, no assurances can be made that the Company will be able to successfully complete all, or any portion of its Capital Plan, or that the Capital Plan will not be materially modified in the future. The Company’s decision to implement its Capital Plan reflects the adverse effect that the severe downturn in the commercial and residential real estate markets has had on the Company’s financial condition and capital base, as well as its assessment of current regulatory expectations of adequate levels of common equity capital. If the Company is not able to successfully complete a substantial portion of its Capital Plan, the Company expects that its business, and the value of its securities, will be materially and adversely affected, and it will be more difficult for the Company to meet the capital requirements expected of it by its primary banking regulators.
     On May 6, 2009, the Company announced that Roberto R. Herencia was named president and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank, replacing J. J. Fritz, who became senior executive vice president of Midwest Banc Holdings. Mr. Herencia, who also was appointed to the board of directors of the Company, was formerly president and director of Banco Popular North America based in Chicago and executive vice president of Popular, Inc., the parent company. Under Mr. Herencia’s direction, the Company immediately tightened its loan underwriting and pricing criteria, began aggressive balance sheet repositioning activities, and developed a comprehensive capital plan, as discussed above. These activities are designed to right-size the Company, preserve capital and reduce the risk inherent in the balance sheet. As a result of these activities, the Company reported asset reductions for the second and third quarters of 2009 and reductions in risk-weighted assets as defined for regulatory capital purposes.
     The Company announced on May 6, 2009, that the Board of Directors made the decision to suspend the dividend on the $43.1 million of Series A noncumulative redeemable convertible perpetual preferred stock; defer the dividend on the $84.8 million of Series T preferred stock; and defer interest payments on $60.8 million of its junior subordinated debentures as permitted by the terms of such debentures. The Company has no current plans to resume dividend payments in respect of the Series A preferred stock or the Series T preferred stock or interest payments in respect of its junior subordinated debentures.

PAGE 29


Table of Contents

Selected Consolidated Financial Data
     The following table sets forth certain selected consolidated financial data at or for the periods indicated.
                                         
    At or For the Three Months Ended     At or For the Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     June 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2009     2008  
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)  
Statement of Income Data:
                                       
Total interest income
  $ 35,135     $ 45,888     $ 40,662     $ 118,063     $ 143,927  
Total interest expense
    19,193       23,735       19,607       59,964       76,793  
 
                             
Net interest income
    15,942       22,153       21,055       58,099       67,134  
Provision for credit losses
    37,450       42,200       20,750       71,453       52,367  
Noninterest income(loss)
    3,657       (60,512 )     7,295       14,295       (54,328 )
Noninterest expenses
    22,450       103,046       24,420       68,378       151,671  
 
                             
Loss before income taxes
    (40,301 )     (183,605 )     (16,820 )     (67,437 )     (191,232 )
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    966       (23,891 )     59,647       55,617       (28,530 )
 
                             
Net loss
    (41,267 )     (159,714 )     (76,467 )     (123,054 )     (162,702 )
Preferred stock dividends and premium accretion
    1,289       835       1,290       4,702       2,506  
Income allocated to participating securities (9)
                             
 
                             
Net loss available to common stockholders
  $ (42,556 )   $ (160,549 )   $ (77,757 )   $ (127,756 )   $ (165,208 )
 
                             
Per Common Share Data:
                                       
Earnings per share (basic)
  $ (1.52 )   $ (5.76 )   $ (2.78 )   $ (4.57 )   $ (5.93 )
Earnings per share (diluted)
    (1.52 )     (5.76 )     (2.78 )     (4.57 )     (5.93 )
Cash dividends declared on common stock
                            0.26  
Book value at end of period
    2.02       5.89       3.45       2.02       5.89  
Tangible book value at end of period (non-GAAP measure) (9)
    (1.25 )     2.51       0.15       (1.25 )     2.51  
Selected Financial Ratios:
                                       
Return on average assets (1)
    (4.49 )%     (17.25 )%     (8.38 )%     (4.50 )%     (5.90 )%
Return on average equity (2)
    (78.30 )     (181.60 )     (103.60 )     (61.15 )     (58.64 )
Dividend payout ratio
                            N/M  
Average equity to average assets
    5.73       9.50       8.09       7.36       10.06  
Tier 1 common capital to risk-weighted assets
    (1.24 )     2.64       0.33       (1.24 )     2.64  
Tier 1 risk-based capital
    6.05       6.26       7.20       6.05       6.26  
Total risk-based capital
    7.95       8.04       9.03       7.95       8.04  
Net interest margin (tax equivalent) (3)(4)
    1.83       2.77       2.52       2.30       2.83  
Loan to deposit ratio
    96.04       99.25       100.82       96.04       99.25  
Net overhead expense to average assets (5)
    2.08       10.73       2.34       2.12       4.52  
Efficiency ratio (6)
    97.74       386.61       97.21       91.63       154.70  
Loan Quality Ratios:
                                       
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
    3.40       1.58       2.50       3.40       1.58  
Provision for loan losses to total loans
    5.93       6.69       3.13       3.80       2.77  
Net loans charged off to average total loans
    2.71       3.98       1.41       1.61       2.11  
Nonaccrual loans to total loans
    7.90       2.42       3.71       7.90       2.42  
Nonperforming assets to total assets (7)
    6.06       1.91       3.52       6.06       1.91  
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans
    0.43 x     0.65 x     0.67 x     0.43 x     0.65 x
Balance Sheet Data:
                                       
Total assets
  $ 3,544,130     $ 3,583,377     $ 3,569,199     $ 3,544,130     $ 3,583,377  
Total earning assets
    3,392,458       3,176,629       3,344,103       3,392,458       3,176,629  
Average assets
    3,650,053       3,682,449       3,660,670       3,653,203       3,685,013  
Loans
    2,454,101       2,494,225       2,559,257       2,454,101       2,494,225  
Allowance for loan losses
    83,506       39,428       63,893       83,506       39,428  
Deposits
    2,555,189       2,513,004       2,538,490       2,555,189       2,513,004  
Borrowings
    777,078       829,024       777,074       777,078       829,024  
Stockholders’ equity
    180,239       207,237       219,671       180,239       207,237  
Tangible stockholders’ equity (non-GAAP measure) (8)
    88,413       113,101       127,272       88,413       113,101  
 
(1)   Net income divided by average assets.
 
(2)   Net income divided by average equity.
 
(3)   Net interest income, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, divided by average earning assets.
 
(4)   The following table reconciles reported net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the periods presented:
                                         
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     June 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2009     2008  
Net interest income
  $ 15,942     $ 22,153     $ 21,055     $ 58,099     $ 67,134  
Tax-equivalent adjustment to net interest income
          457                   2,258  
 
                             
Net interest income, fully tax-equivalent basis
  $ 15,942     $ 22,610     $ 21,055     $ 58,099     $ 69,392  
 
                             
No tax-equivalent adjustment is included for the 2009 periods as a result of the Company’s current tax position.

PAGE 30


Table of Contents

(5)   Noninterest expense less noninterest income, excluding security gains or losses, divided by average assets.
 
(6)   Noninterest expense excluding amortization and foreclosed properties expense divided by noninterest income, excluding security gains or losses, plus net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis.
 
(7)   Includes total nonaccrual, troubled-debt restructured loans, and foreclosed properties.
 
(8)   Stockholders’ equity less goodwill, core deposits and other intangible assets. Management believes that tangible stockholders’ equity (non-GAAP measure) is a more useful measure since it excludes the balances of intangible assets reflecting the Company’s underlying worth. The following table reconciles reported stockholders’ equity to tangible stockholders’ equity for the periods presented:
                         
    At September 30,     At June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009  
Stockholders’ equity
  $ 180,239     $ 207,237     $ 219,671  
Core deposit intangible and other intangibles, net
    12,964       15,274       13,537  
Goodwill
    78,862       78,862       78,862  
 
                 
Tangible stockholders’ equity
  $ 88,413     $ 113,101     $ 127,272  
 
                 
 
(9)   Prior periods with earnings were re-stated as required by the authoritative guidance for determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities (ASC 260-10-55), which was effective on January 1, 2009, to allocate earnings available to common stockholders to restricted shares of common stock that are considered participating securities.
 
(10)   The provision for credit losses includes the provision for loan losses and the provision for unfunded commitments losses as follows:
                                         
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     June 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2009     2008  
Provision for loan losses
  $ 36,700     $ 41,950     $ 20,000     $ 69,700     $ 51,765  
Provision for unfunded commitments losses
    750       250       750       1,753       602  
 
                             
Provision for credit losses
  $ 37,450     $ 42,200     $ 20,750     $ 71,453     $ 52,367  
 
                             
Results of Operations — Three and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 and Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
     Set forth below are highlights of the third quarter of 2009 results compared to the third quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2009.
     Basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was $1.52 compared to $5.76 for the comparable period in 2008 and $2.78 for the second quarter of 2009. Net loss for the third quarter of 2009 was $41.3 million compared to $76.5 million loss in the second quarter of 2009 and loss of $159.7 million for the third quarter of 2008. The results of the second quarter of 2009 included a $57.9 million tax charge due to a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and an $8.1 million tax charge related to the liquidation of bank owned life insurance which was partly offset by the $4.3 million in net gains on the securities portfolio repositioning.
     The annualized return on average assets for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was (4.49)% compared to (17.25)% for the similar period in 2008 and (8.38)% for the second quarter of 2009. The annualized return on average equity for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was (78.30)% compared to (181.60)% for the similar period in 2008 and (103.60)% for the second quarter of 2009.
     Net interest income decreased 28.0% to $15.9 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $22.2 million in the third quarter of 2008 and was 24.3% lower than the second quarter of 2009. Similarly, the net interest margin decreased to 1.83% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to 2.52% in the second quarter of 2009 and 2.77% in the third quarter of 2008, as a result of repositioning the securities portfolio into shorter term lower yielding securities in the second quarter of 2009, the net reversals of interest income related to the increase in nonaccrual loans, the decrease in loan balances, and the increase in low-yielding interest-bearing deposits due from banks.

PAGE 31


Table of Contents

     The provision for credit losses was $37.5 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $42.2 million for the comparable period in 2008 and $20.8 million in the second quarter of 2009. The increase in provision for credit losses in the third quarter of 2009 was due to the large increase in nonaccrual loans. See “Financial Condition — Allowance for Loan Losses.”
     Noninterest income was $3.7 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to ($60.5) million in the third quarter of 2008 and $7.3 million in the second quarter of 2009. The third quarter of 2008 included $16.7 million in securities losses and a $47.8 million securities impairment loss. The second quarter of 2009 included $4.3 million of net gains on the securities portfolio repositioning.
     Noninterest expenses decreased $80.6 million to $22.5 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $103.0 million in the third quarter of 2008 and were $2.0 million lower than the $24.4 million in the second quarter of 2009. The third quarter of 2008 included an $80.0 million goodwill impairment charge. The Company also completed its annual goodwill impairment study as of September 30, 2009 and determined that goodwill was not impaired. The decline in noninterest expense of $2.0 million in the third quarter of 2009 reflects the impact of the cost reduction efforts, which began late in the second quarter of 2009. Excluding one time impacts, salaries and benefits were $1.8 million lower compared to the second quarter reflecting a reduction in force of 77 full-time equivalent (“FTE”) employees (116 FTE employees, or a 21.6% reduction year to date), salary reductions for remaining employees, and suspension of the Company’s 401(k) contribution. The decrease in noninterest expenses compared to the previous quarter was also due to the FDIC insurance special assessment of $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2009.
     Set forth below are highlights of the nine months ended September 30, 2009 results compared to the results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
     Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $123.1 million, or $4.57 per basic and diluted share, compared to $162.7 million, or $5.93 per basic and diluted share, for the same period in 2008. The annualized return on average assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was (4.50)% compared to (5.90)% for the similar period in 2008. The results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 included a $57.9 million tax charge due to a valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets and an $8.1 million tax charge related to the liquidation of bank owned life insurance which was partly offset by the $4.6 million in net gains on the securities portfolio mainly due to the repositioning. The results of the nine months ended September 30, 2008 included impairment charges on securities and goodwill of $65.4 million and $80.0 million, respectively, net losses on securities transactions and extinguishement of debt of $16.6 million and $7.1 million, respectively, and a gain on the sale of property of $15.2 million. The annualized return on average equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was (61.15)% compared to (58.64)% for the similar period in 2008.
     Net interest income decreased 13.5% to $58.1 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to $67.1 million in the first nine months of 2008 largely due to the repositioning the securities portfolio into shorter term lower yielding securities in the second quarter of 2009 and the net interest reversals related to the increase in nonaccrual loans. The net interest margin was 2.30% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 2.83% for the similar period of 2008.
     The provision for credit losses was $71.5 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to $52.4 million for the comparable period in 2008 due to a large increase in nonaccrual loans. Noninterest income increased to $14.3 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to ($54.3) million in the same period of 2008. The increase in cash surrender value of life insurance decreased $1.3 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Noninterest expenses decreased to $68.4 million for the

PAGE 32


Table of Contents

nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $151.7 million for the similar period of 2008. FDIC insurance expense increased $3.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $6.0 million compared to the same period in 2008 due to the FDIC insurance special assessment of $1.7 million and increased regular quarterly FDIC premiums. The increase in foreclosed properties expense of $3.6 million and $1.5 million increase in professional services expenses were partly offset by the decrease in salaries and benefits expense of $4.7 million.
Net Interest Income
     The following table sets forth the average balances, net interest income on a tax equivalent basis and average yields and rates for the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the indicated periods.
                                                                         
    For the Three Months Ended  
    September 30, 2009     September 30, 2008     June 30, 2009  
    Average             Average     Average             Average     Average             Average  
    Balance     Interest     Rate     Balance     Interest     Rate     Balance     Interest     Rate  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
                                                                       
Interest-Earning Assets:
                                                                       
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits due from banks
  $ 303,890       164       0.22 %   $ 6,005       27       1.80 %   $ 59,551       75       0.50 %
Securities:
                                                                       
Taxable(1)
    637,198       1,488       0.93       654,531       7,823       4.78       626,489       4,663       2.98  
Exempt from federal income taxes(1)
    2,390       29       4.85       60,688       883       5.82       43,005       406       3.78  
 
                                                           
Total securities
    639,588       1,517       0.95       715,219       8,706       4.87       669,494       5,069       3.03  
FRB and FHLB stock
    27,999       160       2.29       29,694       184       2.48       30,301       170       2.24  
Loans:
                                                                       
Commercial loans(1)(2)(3)
    527,661       7,015       5.32       544,013       8,145       5.99       549,168       6,770       4.93  
Commercial real estate loans(1)(2)(3)(4)
    1,620,388       22,416       5.53       1,639,444       24,919       6.08       1,675,704       24,608       5.87  
Agricultural loans(2)(3)
    8,350       133       6.37       6,531       103       6.31       9,991       164       6.57  
Consumer real estate loans(2)(3)(4)
    343,128       3,640       4.24       314,377       4,119       5.24       343,898       3,708       4.31  
Consumer installment loans(2)(3)
    5,607       90       6.42       8,288       142       6.85       5,996       98       6.54  
 
                                                           
Total loans
    2,505,134       33,294       5.32       2,512,653       37,428       5.96       2,584,757       35,348       5.47  
 
                                                           
Total interest-earning assets
  $ 3,476,611     $ 35,135       4.04 %   $ 3,263,571     $ 46,345       5.68 %   $ 3,344,103     $ 40,662       4.86 %
 
                                                                       
Noninterest-Earning Assets:
                                                                       
Cash
  $ 34,903                     $ 57,463                     $ 44,037                  
Premises and equipment, net
    40,705                       38,412                       39,331                  
Allowance for loan losses
    (67,605 )                     (23,059 )                     (58,211 )                
Other assets
    165,439                       346,062                       291,410                  
 
                                                                 
Total noninterest-earning assets
    173,442                       418,878                       316,567                  
 
                                                                 
Total assets
  $ 3,650,053                     $ 3,682,449                     $ 3,660,670                  
 
                                                                 
 
                                                                       
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
                                                                       
Deposits:
                                                                       
Interest-bearing demand deposits
  $ 179,094     $ 205       0.46 %   $ 194,416     $ 422       0.87 %   $ 178,231     $ 222       0.50 %
Money-market demand and savings accounts
    344,203       687       0.80       393,745       1,184       1.20       358,791       721       0.80  
Time deposits
    1,765,654       10,493       2.38       1,487,827       13,695       3.68       1,658,904       11,267       2.72  
 
                                                           
Total interest-bearing deposits
    2,288,951       11,385       1.99       2,075,988       15,301       2.95       2,195,926       12,210       2.22  
 
                                                                       
Borrowings:
                                                                       
Federal funds purchased, FRB discount window advances, and repurchase agreements
    297,693       3,264       4.39       403,025       3,901       3.87       319,397       3,249       4.07  
FHLB advances
    340,000       3,065       3.61       348,315       2,779       3.19       342,637       3,035       3.54  
Junior subordinated debentures
    60,827       497       3.27       60,766       864       5.69       60,816       615       4.04  
Subordinated debt
    15,000       145       3.87       15,000       229       6.11       15,000       144       3.84  
Revolving note payable
    8,600       158       7.35       9,404       96       4.08       8,600       88       4.09  
Term note payable
    55,000       679       4.94       55,000       565       4.11       55,000       266       1.93  
 
                                                           
Total borrowings
    777,120       7,808       4.02       891,510       8,434       3.78       801,450       7,397       3.69  
 
                                                           
Total interest-bearing liabilities
  $ 3,066,071     $ 19,193       2.50 %   $ 2,967,498     $ 23,735       3.20 %   $ 2,997,376     $ 19,607       2.62 %
 
                                                                       
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities:
                                                                       
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
  $ 341,197                     $ 335,025                     $ 333,600                  
Other liabilities
    33,688                       30,048                       33,639                  
 
                                                                 
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
    374,885                       365,073                       367,239                  
Stockholders’ equity
    209,097                       349,878                       296,055                  
 
                                                                 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 3,650,053                     $ 3,682,449                     $ 3,660,670                  
 
                                                                 

PAGE 33


Table of Contents

                                                                         
    For the Three Months Ended  
    September 30, 2009     September 30, 2008     June 30, 2009  
    Average             Average     Average             Average     Average             Average  
    Balance     Interest     Rate     Balance     Interest     Rate     Balance     Interest     Rate  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Net interest income (tax equivalent)(1)(5)
          $ 15,942       1.54 %           $ 22,610       2.48 %           $ 21,055       2.24 %
 
                                                                 
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)(1)
                    1.83 %                     2.77 %                     2.52 %
 
                                                                       
Net interest income(5)(6)
          $ 15,942                     $ 22,153                     $ 21,055          
 
                                                                 
Net interest margin(5)
                    1.83 %                     2.72 %                     2.52 %
 
                                                                       
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
    113.39 %                     109.98 %                     111.57 %                
 
(1)   Adjusted for 35% tax rate and adjusted for the dividends-received deduction, except for the quarters ended September 30, and June 30, 2009 as a result of the Company’s current tax position.
 
(2)   Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance; however, these loans are not earning any interest.
 
(3)   Includes loan fees of $528, $900, and $574 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008, and June 30, 2009, respectively.
 
(4)   Includes construction loans.
 
(5)   The following table reconciles reported net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the periods presented:
                         
    For the three months ended,  
    September 30,     September 30,     June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009  
Net interest income
  $ 15,942     $ 22,153     $ 21,055  
Tax equivalent adjustment to net interest income
          457        
 
                 
Net interest income, tax equivalent basis
  $ 15,942     $ 22,610     $ 21,055  
 
                 
(6)   Not adjusted for 35% tax rate or for the dividends-received deduction.
                                                 
    For the Nine Months Ended  
    September 30, 2009     September 30, 2008  
    Average             Average     Average             Average  
    Balance     Interest     Rate     Balance     Interest     Rate  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
                                               
Interest-Earning Assets:
                                               
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits due from banks
  $ 123,838     $ 276       0.30 %   $ 16,840     $ 273       2.16 %
Securities:
                                               
Taxable(1)
    631,184       13,091       2.77       686,517       26,901       5.22  
Exempt from federal income taxes(1)
    34,443       985       3.81       61,388       2,715       5.90  
 
                                       
Total securities
    665,627       14,076       2.82       747,905       29,616       5.28  
FRB and FHLB stock
    29,986       520       2.31       29,397       551       2.50  
Loans:
                                               
Commercial loans(1)(2)(3)
    535,755       20,336       5.06       510,213       24,282       6.35  
Commercial real estate loans(1)(2)(3)(4)
    1,653,125       71,230       5.75       1,638,120       77,716       6.33  
Agricultural loans(2)(3)
    8,622       416       6.43       6,029       290       6.41  
Consumer real estate loans(2)(3)(4)
    340,959       10,914       4.27       313,247       12,950       5.51  
Consumer installment loans(2)(3)
    5,951       295       6.61       9,843       507       6.87  
 
                                       
Total loans
    2,544,412       103,191       5.41       2,477,452       115,745       6.23  
 
                                       
Total interest-earning assets
  $ 3,363,863     $ 118,063       4.68 %   $ 3,271,594     $ 146,185       5.96 %
 
                                               
Noninterest-Earning Assets:
                                               
Cash
  $ 49,191                     $ 55,272                  
Premises and equipment, net
    39,410                       39,290                  
Allowance for loan losses
    (57,517 )                     (23,584 )                
Other assets
    258,256                       342,441                  
 
                                           
Total noninterest-earning assets
    289,340                       413,419                  
 
                                           
Total assets
  $ 3,653,203                     $ 3,685,013                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
                                               
Deposits:
                                               
Interest-bearing demand deposits
  $ 176,893     $ 683       0.51 %   $ 208,949     $ 1,660       1.06 %
Money-market demand and savings accounts
    351,563       2,161       0.82       401,377       4,209       1.40  
Time deposits
    1,681,472       34,436       2.73       1,468,836       44,632       4.05  
 
                                       
Total interest-bearing deposits
    2,209,928       37,280       2.25       2,079,162       50,501       3.24  
 
                                               
Borrowings:
                                               
Federal funds purchased, FRB discount window advances and repurchase agreements
    316,893       9,747       4.10       418,992       12,048       3.83  
FHLB advances
    348,462       9,129       3.49       319,943       8,698       3.62  
Junior subordinated debentures
    60,814       1,851       4.06       60,749       2,785       6.11  
Subordinated debt
    15,000       441       3.92       10,073       464       6.14  
Revolving note payable
    8,600       289       4.48       8,227       270       4.38  
Term note payable
    55,000       1,227       2.97       59,927       2,027       4.51  
 
                                       
Total borrowings
    804,769       22,684       3.76       877,911       26,292       3.99  
 
                                       
Total interest-bearing liabilities
  $ 3,014,697     $ 59,964       2.65 %   $ 2,957,073     $ 76,793       3.46 %
 
                                               
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities:
                                               
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
  $ 335,288                     $ 324,586                  
Other liabilities
    34,172                       32,711                  
 
                                           

PAGE 34


Table of Contents

                                                 
    For the Nine Months Ended  
    September 30, 2009     September 30, 2008  
    Average             Average     Average             Average  
    Balance     Interest     Rate     Balance     Interest     Rate  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
    369,460                       357,297                  
Stockholders’ equity
    269,046                       370,643                  
 
                                           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 3,653,203                     $ 3,685,013                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Net interest income (tax equivalent)(1)(5)
          $ 58,099       2.03 %           $ 69,392       2.50 %
 
                                           
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)(1)
                    2.30 %                     2.83 %
 
                                               
Net interest income(5)(6)
          $ 58,099                     $ 67,134          
 
                                           
Net interest margin(6)
                    2.30 %                     2.74 %
 
                                               
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
    111.58 %                     110.64 %                
 
(1)   Adjusted for 35% tax rate and adjusted for the dividends-received deduction, except for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of the Company’s current tax position
 
(2)   Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance; however, these loans are not earning any interest.
 
(3)   Includes loan fees of $1,580 and $2,288 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
(4)   Includes construction loans.
 
(5)   The following table reconciles reported net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the periods presented:
                 
    For the nine months ended,  
    September 30,  
    2009     2008  
Net interest income
  $ 58,099     $ 67,134  
Tax equivalent adjustment to net interest income
          2,258  
 
           
Net interest income, tax equivalent basis
  $ 58,099     $ 69,392  
 
           
(6)   Not adjusted for 35% tax rate or for the dividends-received deduction.
     Net interest income is the difference between interest income and fees on earning assets and interest expense on deposits and borrowings. Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets during the period.
     Net interest income decreased by $6.2 million, or 28.0%, to $15.9 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 and decreased by $5.1 million compared to the previous quarter. Net interest income declined by $9.0 million, or 13.5%, to $58.1 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. As a result of the securities portfolio repositioning in the second quarter, reversals of interest income related to the increase in nonaccrual loans, and the decrease in loan balances, the net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, decreased to 1.83% for the third quarter of 2009 compared to 2.52% for the second quarter of 2009 and 2.77% for the third quarter of 2008. The net interest margin declined to 2.30% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 2.83% for the same period in 2008, as a result of the securities portfolio repositioning in the second quarter of 2009, reversals of interest income related to the increase in nonaccrual loans, and the lower yields earned on loans. Due to the Company’s current tax position, the net interest margin for the 2009 periods does not reflect a fully taxable-equivalent adjustment.
Trends in Interest-earning Assets
     Yields on average interest-earning assets decreased by 164 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008, while average balances on interest-earning assets increased by $213.0 million, mainly as the result of the increase in interest-bearing deposits due from banks. Yields on average interest-earning assets decreased by 82 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2009. Yields on average earning assets decreased 128 basis points in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the similar period in 2008, while average balances increased $92.3 million. The decrease in yields was primarily due to the decrease in the overall market rates impacting variable rate loans, interest foregone on nonaccruing loans, and the decline in interest income on securities due to the securities portfolio repositioning into shorter term, lower yielding securities.
     Average yields on loans for the third quarter of 2009 decreased by 15 basis points to 5.32% compared to the second quarter of 2009 and were 64 basis points lower compared to the same period in 2008. For the first

PAGE 35


Table of Contents

nine months of 2009, average yields on loans decreased by 82 basis points to 5.41% compared to the same period of 2008. This decline in yields was primarily due to the re-pricing of the variable rate loans resulting from decreases in the prime rate which was partially mitigated by interest rate floors. Average loans decreased by $7.5 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 and decreased by $79.6 million compared to the second quarter of 2009. Average loans increased by $67.0 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
     Yields on average securities decreased in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the prior quarter and the same period in 2008 by 208 basis points and 392 basis points, respectively, due largely to the repositioning of the securities portfolio into shorter term lower, yielding securities. Average securities decreased by $75.6 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the similar period in 2008 and decreased by $29.9 million compared to the second quarter of 2009, mainly due to sales. Yields on average securities decreased by 246 basis points in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the similar period in 2008 and average balances decreased by $82.3 million.
     During second quarter of 2009, the Company repositioned its securities portfolio to lower capital requirements associated with higher risk-weighted assets, restructure expected cash flows, reduce credit risk, and enhance the Bank’s asset sensitivity. The Company sold $538.1 million of its securities portfolio with an average yield of 3.94% and average life of slightly over two years. These securities were sold in the open market at a net gain of $4.3 million. The Company purchased $571.0 million of U.S. Treasury bills and Government National Mortgage Association mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on these securities is 0.43% with an average life of less than six months.
Trends in Interest-bearing Liabilities
     The Company’s cost of funds decreased by 12 basis points on a linked-quarter basis as a result of decreased rates paid on interest-bearing deposits. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $68.7 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared to the prior quarter. Yields on average interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 70 basis points due to the lower costs of interest-bearing deposits, while average balances increased $98.6 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the similar period in 2008. When compared to the first nine months of 2008, the cost of funds decreased by 81 basis points to 2.65% for the first nine months of 2009 due to the lower costs of interest-bearing deposits, while average interest-bearing liabilities increased $57.6 million.
     Average interest-bearing deposits increased by $213.0 million, while average rates decreased 96 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the similar period of 2008. Average rates paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased by 23 basis points to 1.99% for the third quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2009, but average balances increased by $93.0 million. Yields on average interest-bearing deposits decreased by 99 basis points in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the similar period in 2008, and average balances increased by $130.8 million. Most of the decrease in average rates was in certificates of deposit that matured and re-priced at lower rates.
     Average interest-bearing demand deposit, money market, and savings accounts decreased by $13.7 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2009 and decreased by $64.9 million compared to the third quarter of 2008. On a year-to-date basis, average interest-bearing demand deposit, money market, and savings accounts decreased by $81.9 million compared to 2008.
     The costs of average borrowings increased by 24 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, while average balances decreased by $114.4 million. Less reliance on borrowings was largely due to increased funds from deposits. Average borrowings decreased by $24.3 million in the third quarter of 2009 over the second quarter of 2009, while average rates paid increased by 33 basis points to 4.02%

PAGE 36


Table of Contents

due to the increase to the default rates on the revolving and term notes payable. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, average borrowings decreased by $73.1 million and average rates paid decreased by 23 basis points, largely due to decreases in short-term LIBOR rates.
Noninterest Income
     Set forth below is a summary of the third quarter 2009 noninterest income activity compared to the third quarter of 2008 and second quarter of 2009.
     The annualized noninterest income to average assets ratio was 0.40% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to (6.54)% for the same period in 2008 and 0.80% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as a result of the changes in noninterest income discussed below. Noninterest income was $3.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $64.2 million over the comparable period in 2008. Noninterest income for third quarter of 2008 included losses on securities transactions of $16.7 million and an impairment charge on securities of $47.8 million. Noninterest income for the third quarter of 2009 was $3.6 million lower than the second quarter of 2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to the net gains less impairment charges on the securities portfolio repositioning of $3.5 million recognized in the second quarter of 2009.
     Service charges on deposits in the third quarter of 2009 were flat at $2.0 million when compared to the same period in 2008 and the second quarter of 2009. Insurance and brokerage commissions for the three months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by $180,000, or 40.2%, to $268,000 when compared to the third quarter of 2008, and decreased by $70,000 when compared to the second quarter of 2009. These decreases are mostly due to the difficult economy. Trust income decreased by $114,000 in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 due to the decreased value of trust assets under management but increased by $41,000 compared to the second quarter of 2009. Income from the increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance decreased by $911,000 and $491,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the similar period in 2008 and the second quarter of 2009, respectively, reflecting the liquidation of the bank owned life insurance during the second quarter of 2009.
     Set forth below is a summary of the nine months ended September 30, 2009 noninterest income activity compared to the same period in 2008.
     The annualized noninterest income to average assets ratio was 0.52% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to (1.97)% for the same period in 2008, as a result of the changes in noninterest income discussed below. Noninterest income was $14.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $68.6 million over the comparable period in 2008. In the first nine months of 2008, the Company recognized an impairment charge on securities of $65.4 million, net losses of $16.6 million on securities transactions, and a gain on the sale of property of $15.2 million.
     Service charges on deposits in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were flat at $5.9 million when compared to the same period in 2008. Insurance and brokerage commissions for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased by $765,000, or 45.2%, when compared to the same period in 2008, mostly due to the difficult economy causing a lower volume of transactions. Trust income decreased by $467,000 in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, partially due to market value decreases and loss of accounts. Trust income is largely based on a percentage of assets under management. Income from the increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance decreased by 49.4% to $1.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the similar period in 2008, reflecting the liquidation of the bank owned life insurance in the second quarter of 2009.

PAGE 37


Table of Contents

Noninterest Expenses
     Set forth below is a summary of the third quarter 2009 noninterest expenses compared to the third quarter of 2008 and the second quarter of 2009.
     The annualized noninterest expenses to average assets ratio was 2.44% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 11.16% for the same period in 2008 and 2.76% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as a result of the changes in noninterest expense discussed below. Total noninterest expenses decreased by $80.6 million, to $22.5 million during the third quarter of 2009 compared to $103.0 million for the similar period in 2008. Noninterest expenses for third quarter of 2008 included a goodwill impairment charge of $80.0 million. The decline in noninterest expense of $2.0 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2009 reflects the impact of the cost reduction efforts, which began late in the second quarter of 2009. Excluding one time impacts, salaries and benefits were $1.8 million lower compared to the second quarter reflecting a reduction in force of 77 full-time equivalent (“FTE”) employees (116 FTE employees, or a 21.6% reduction year to date), salary reductions for remaining employees, and the suspension of the Company’s 401(k) contribution. The decrease in noninterest expenses compared to the previous quarter was also due to the FDIC insurance special assessment of $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2009.
     Salaries and benefits expense decreased by $3.6 million, or 28.5%, during the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 and by $2.9 million, or 24.5%, compared to the second quarter of 2009, due to the cost reduction initiatives described above as well as the decrease in incentive and stock based compensation expenses. Occupancy and equipment expense was relatively flat during the third quarter of 2009 at $3.2 million compared to the similar period in 2008, but decreased by $181,000, or 5.4%, compared to the second quarter of 2009, mainly due to decreased rent and maintenance expenses. Professional services expense rose by $822,000 to $2.8 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008. Professional services expense increased by $948,000 compared to the second quarter of 2009. This increase was due to the increased legal and consulting fees related to capital plan activities, the goodwill study, and loan portfolio credit-loss studies. Marketing expenses in the third quarter of 2009 were $374,000 lower than in the third quarter of 2008 and $138,000 lower than the second quarter of 2009, as certain programs were scaled back or put on hold in order to control costs. Foreclosed properties expense increased in the third quarter of 2009 by $3.1 million and $2.6 million compared to the third quarter of 2008 and second quarter of 2009, respectively, due to the increase in foreclosed properties and the write-down of certain properties to current fair value less costs to sell. The average balance of foreclosed properties was $20.8 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared to $18.7 million for the second quarter of 2009.
     Set forth below is a summary of noninterest expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
     The annualized noninterest expenses to average assets ratio was 2.50% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 5.52% for the same period in 2008. Total noninterest expenses decreased $83.3 million to $68.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $151.7 million for the similar period in 2008. The Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $80.0 million and a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $7.1 million resulting from the prepayment of $130.0 million in advances from the FHLB in 2008.
     Salaries and benefits expense decreased by $4.7 million, or 12.8%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, which was due in large part to decrease of $2.9 million in incentive expense and $1.4 million in stock-based compensation expense. This decrease was also due to the reduction in force of 130 FTE employees from September 30, 2008, salary reductions for remaining employees, and the suspension of the Company’s 401(k) contribution. Occupancy and equipment expense increased by $573,000, or 6.2%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $9.8 million compared to the similar period in 2009 mainly due to increased rent and maintenance expenses. Professional services expense rose by $1.5

PAGE 38


Table of Contents

million, or 27.7%, to $6.8 million in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 due to higher legal, including legal expenses related to problem loan workouts, and consulting expenses related to capital plan activities, the goodwill study, and loan portfolio credit-loss studies. Marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $1.2 million, or 34.1% lower than in the same period in 2008, as certain programs were scaled back or put on hold in an effort to control costs. Foreclosed properties expense increased in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 by $3.6 million compared to the same period in 2008, due to the increase in foreclosed properties and the write-down of certain properties to updated fair values less costs to sell. Foreclosed properties were $21.0 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $12.0 million at year end 2008. FDIC insurance expense increased $3.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $6.0 million compared to the same period in 2008 due to the special assessment of $1.7 million and increased regular quarterly FDIC premiums.
Income Taxes
     The Company recorded income tax expense of $966,000 and an income tax benefit of $23.9 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded income tax expense of $55.6 million compared to an income tax benefit of $28.5 million for the same period of 2008. The change in the effective tax rate reflects $57.9 million related to the recognition of a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets and the $8.1 million tax charge related to the liquidation of bank owned life insurance in the second quarter of 2009. The Company’s marginal tax rate is approximately 40%; however, under current conditions the Company would expect to offset any tax benefits earned with similar increases in the valuation allowance.
     The difference between the provision for income taxes in the consolidated financial statements and amounts computed by applying the current federal statutory income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes is reconciled as follows:
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Income taxes computed at the statutory rate
  $ (14,105 )     35.0 %   $ (64,262 )     35.0 %   $ (23,603 )     35.0 %   $ (66,931 )     35.0 %
Tax-exempt interest income on securities and loans
    (47 )     0.1       (213 )     0.1       (449 )     0.7       (617 )     0.3  
General business credits
    (147 )     0.4       (168 )     0.1       (441 )     0.7       (445 )     0.2  
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit due to state operating loss
    (2,388 )     5.9       (2,137 )     1.2       (2,607 )     3.9       (2,898 )     1.5  
Life insurance cash surrender value increase, net of premiums
                (319 )     0.2       (466 )     0.7       (922 )     0.5  
Liquidation of bank-owned life insurance
                            6,924       (10.3 )            
Dividends received deduction
                (47 )                       (649 )     0.3  
Goodwill impairment
                28,000       (15.3 )                 28,000       (14.6 )
Valuation allowance
    17,397       (43.2 )     14,851       (8.1 )     75,259       ( 111.7 )     14,851       (7.8 )
Nondeductible costs and other, net
    256       (0.6 )     404       (0.2 )     1,000       (1.5 )     1,081       (0.5 )
 
                                               
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
  $ 966       (2.4 )%   $ (23,891 )     13.0 %   $ 55,617       (82.5 )%   $ (28,530 )     14.9 %
 
                                               
     The Company increased the total valuation allowance by $16.9 million to $76.9 million against its existing net deferred tax assets during the third quarter of 2009. The valuation allowance includes $1.6 million recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss fully offsetting deferred taxes which were established for securities available for sale and for the SERP program. The Company’s primary deferred tax assets relate to its allowance for loan losses, net operating losses (“NOL’s”) and impairment charges relating to FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock holdings. Under generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation allowance is required to be recognized if it is “more likely than not” that such deferred tax assets will not be realized. In making that determination, management is required to evaluate both positive and negative evidence including recent historical financial performance, forecasts of future income, tax planning strategies and assessments of the current and future economic and business conditions. The Company performs and updates this evaluation on a quarterly basis.

PAGE 39


Table of Contents

     In conducting its regular quarterly evaluation, the Company made a determination to maintain the valuation allowance as of September 30, 2009 based primarily upon the existence of a three year cumulative loss derived by combining the pre-tax income (loss) reported during the two most recent annual periods (calendar years ended 2007 and 2008) with management’s current projected results for the year ending 2009. This three year cumulative loss position is primarily attributable to significant provisions for loan losses incurred and currently forecasted during the three years ending 2009 and losses realized during 2008 on its FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock holdings. The Company’s current financial forecasts indicate that taxable income will be generated in the future. However, the existing deferred tax benefits may not be fully realized due to statutory limitations on their utilization based on the Company’s planned capital restructuring. The creation and subsequent addition to the valuation allowance, although it increased tax expense for the second and third quarters and similarly reduced tangible book values, did not have an effect on the Company’s cash flows. The remaining net deferred tax assets of $4.1 million are supported by available tax planning strategies. The Company expects valuation allowance adjustments equal to any tax expense or benefits earned; therefore, it expects an effective rate of 0% in the near term.
     During the second quarter of 2009, the Company liquidated its $85.8 million investment in bank owned life insurance in order to reduce the Company’s investment risk and its risk-weighted assets which favorably impacted the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios. The $16.3 million increase in cash surrender value of the policies since the time of purchase was treated as ordinary income for tax purposes. Additionally, a 10% IRS excise tax was incurred as a result of the liquidation. As a result, the Company recorded federal tax expense of $6.9 million and an additional state tax expense of $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2009 for this transaction.
Financial Condition
     The Company has improved the quality of the Bank’s balance sheet over the past two quarters through building of loan loss reserves, repositioning of the securities portfolio to provide a high level of liquidity and re-assessing the valuation of its deferred tax assets, while maintaining the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios as the Company executes a complex and comprehensive Capital Plan.
     Set forth below are balance sheet highlights at September 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008.
  Total assets decreased $26.1 million at September 30, 2009 compared to year end 2008 and were down $39.2 million compared to September 30, 2008.
 
  Cash and cash equivalents increased $264.4 million at September 30, 2009 compared to year end 2008 and were up $214.0 million compared to September 30, 2008 improving the liquidity position.
 
  Total loans decreased $55.7 million to $2.5 billion at September 30, 2009 compared to year end 2008 and by $40.1 million over the third quarter of 2008, partly due to stricter underwriting standards and charge-offs.
 
  The $85.8 million investment in bank owned life insurance was liquidated during the second quarter of 2009 in order to reduce the Company’s investment risk and the Bank’s regulatory capital requirement.
 
  At June 30, 2009, the Company established a valuation allowance of $60.0 million against its existing net deferred tax assets. The Company increased the valuation allowance by $16.9 million to $76.9 million against its existing net deferred tax assets during the third quarter of 2009.
 
  Deposits increased by $142.4 million to $2.6 billion at September 30, 2009 compared to year end

PAGE 40


Table of Contents

    2008 and increased by $42.2 million when compared to September 30, 2008, mainly as a result of successful certificate of deposit promotions.
     Set forth below are asset quality highlights at September 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008.
  The downturn in the commercial and residential real estate markets continued to have a material negative impact on the Company’s loan portfolio, resulting in a significant deterioration in credit quality and an increase in loan losses and its allowance for loan losses. The Company believes it is likely that the credit quality of its loan portfolio will further deteriorate through the end of 2009.
 
  Nonaccrual loans were 7.90% of total loans at September 30, 2009, up from 2.43% of total loans at year end and 2.42% at September 30, 2008.
 
  Foreclosed properties increased from $12.0 million at year end to $21.0 million at September 30, 2009, mainly due to the foreclosure action on three large loan relationships.
 
  Loan delinquencies of 30-89 days were 3.24% of loans at September 30, 2009, up from 1.03% at December 31, 2008 and 0.99% at September 30, 2008, due to the continued deterioration of economic conditions.
 
  Nonperforming assets were 6.06% of total assets at September 30, 2009, up from 2.36% at year end and 1.91% at September 30, 2008, as a result of the increase in nonaccrual loans and foreclosed properties.
 
  The allowance for loan losses was 3.40% of total loans as of September 30, 2009, versus 1.77% at year end 2008 and 1.58% at September 30, 2008, due to a $69.7 million provision in the first nine months of 2009 with net charge-offs of $30.6 million during that period.
 
  The allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans ratio was 43.07% at September 30, 2009, 72.72% at year end, and 65.20% for the corresponding period of 2008.
Loans
     Average total loans decreased $79.6 million during the third quarter of 2009. From June 30, 2009 to September 30, 2009, loans outstanding declined $105.2 million, primarily due to stricter underwriting standards. Average loans yielded 5.32% in the third quarter of 2009, compared to 5.47% in the second quarter of 2009, with 82% of all loans tied to prime having interest rate floors in place and 78% of those loans currently at their floors.

PAGE 41


Table of Contents

     The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s loan portfolio on a source of repayment basis as of the indicated dates.
                                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
            % of Gross             % of Gross  
    Amount     Loans     Amount     Loans  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Commercial
  $ 1,045,533       42.6 %   $ 1,090,078       43.3 %
Construction
    324,074       13.2       366,178       14.6  
Commercial real estate
    744,464       30.3       729,729       29.1  
Home equity
    227,966       9.3       194,673       7.8  
Other consumer
    5,583       0.2       6,332       0.3  
Residential mortgage
    107,124       4.4       123,161       4.9  
 
                       
Total loans, gross
    2,454,744       100.0 %     2,510,151       100.0 %
 
                           
Net deferred fees
    (643 )             (392 )        
 
                           
Total loans, net
  $ 2,454,101             $ 2,509,759          
 
                           
     Total loans decreased $55.7 million at September 30, 2009 from December 31, 2008. Total loans decreased by $105.2 million from the second quarter of 2009. Set forth below are other highlights of the loan portfolio. The Company expects to see continued portfolio declines in the near term due to its emphasis on underwriting and pricing discipline begun in the second quarter of 2009.
  Commercial loans decreased $44.5 million to $1.0 billion as of September 30, 2009 from December 31, 2008 and comprise 42.6% of the loan portfolio.
 
  Construction loans decreased by $42.1 million to $324.1 million, or 13.2% of the loan portfolio, as of September 30, 2009 from $366.2 million and 14.6% at December 31, 2008.
 
  Commercial real estate loans increased by $14.7 million to $744.5 million, or 30.3% of the loan portfolio, as of September 30, 2009 from $729.7 million and 29.1% at year end.
 
  Home equity loans increased by $33.3 million to $228.0 million, or 9.3% of the loan portfolio, as of September 30, 2009 from $194.7 million at year end.
 
  Residential mortgage loans decreased by $16.0 million to $107.1 million as of September 30, 2009 from $123.2 million at year end.
 
  The Company does not hold any sub-prime loans in its residential mortgage portfolio.
Allowance for Loan Losses
     The allowance for loan losses has been established to provide for those loans that may not be repaid in their entirety for a variety of reasons. The allowance is maintained at a level considered by management to be adequate to provide for probable incurred losses. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to earnings and is reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. The provision for loan losses is based upon past loan loss experience and management’s evaluation of the loan portfolio under current economic conditions. Loans are charged to the allowance for loan losses when, and to the extent, they are deemed by management to be uncollectible. The allowance for loan losses is comprised of allocations for specific loans and a historical loss based portion for all other loans.

PAGE 42


Table of Contents

Following is a summary of activity in the allowance for loan losses:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Balance, at beginning of period
  $ 63,893     $ 22,606     $ 44,432     $ 26,748  
Provision charged to operations
    36,700       41,950       69,700       51,765  
Loans charged off
    (17,723 )     (25,224 )     (32,268 )     (40,472 )
Recoveries
    636       96       1,642       1,387  
 
                       
Net loans charged off
    (17,087 )     (25,128 )     (30,626 )     (39,085 )
 
                       
Balance, at end of period
  $ 83,506     $ 39,428     $ 83,506     $ 39,428  
 
                       
     The Company recorded a provision for loan losses of $36.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 reflecting management’s assessment of impaired loans, specific reserves associated with loans identified as impaired during the quarter, the migration of loans not specifically analyzed for impairment into higher credit risk rating categories, and the continued deterioration of economic conditions.
     A provision for loan losses of $69.7 million was taken for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $51.8 million for the similar period in 2008, reflecting management’s updated assessments of impaired loans and the continued deterioration of economic conditions. The Company had net charge-offs of $30.6 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to $39.1 million for the same period in 2008.
     The Company had a reserve for losses on unfunded commitments of $2.1 million at September 30, 2009, up from $1.1 million at December 31, 2008 and $793,000 at September 30, 2008.
     The following table sets forth certain asset quality ratios related to the allowance for loan losses on a quarter-to-date basis as of the indicated dates.
                         
    September 30,   December 31,   September 30,
    2009   2008   2008
 
                       
Net loans charged off to average loans during quarter
    2.71 %     2.39 %     3.98 %
Provision for loan losses to total loans
    5.93       3.17       6.69  
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
    3.40       1.77       1.58  
Allowance to nonaccrual loans
    0.43x       0.73x       0.65x  
     The Company recognizes that credit losses will be experienced and the risk of loss will vary with, among other things; general economic conditions; the type of loan being made; the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan; and in the case of a collateralized loan, the quality of the collateral. The allowance for loan losses represents the Company’s estimate of the amount deemed necessary to provide for probable losses existing in the portfolio. In making this determination, the Company analyzes the ultimate collectibility of the loans in its portfolio by incorporating feedback provided by internal loan staff. Each loan officer grades his or her individual commercial credits and the Company’s loan review personnel independently review the officers’ grades.
     In the event that the loan is downgraded during this review, the loan is included in the allowance analysis at the lower grade. On a quarterly basis, management of the Bank meets to review the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
     Estimating the amount of the allowance for loan losses requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends

PAGE 43


Table of Contents

and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the consolidated balance sheet. Loan losses are charged off against the allowance, while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the allowance. A provision for loan losses is charged to operations based on management’s periodic evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, as well as other pertinent factors.
     The Company’s methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses represents an estimation performed pursuant to the authoritative guidance for contingencies (ASC 450) and loan impairments (ASC 310-10-35). The allowance reflects expected losses resulting from analyses developed through specific credit allocations for individual loans and historical loss experience for each loan category. The specific credit allocations are based on regular analyses of all loans over $300,000 where the internal credit rating is at or below a predetermined classification. These analyses involve a high degree of judgment in estimating the amount of loss associated with specific loans, including estimating the amount and timing of future cash flows and collateral values. The allowance for loan losses also includes consideration of concentrations, changes in portfolio mix and volume, loan risk ratings and other qualitative factors.
     During the third quarter of 2009, steps were taken to improve the credit review function. The Company strengthened its portfolio review process, tracking of credit trends and documentation of exceptions. The Company devoted additional resources to its loan workout unit and engaged an independent firm to actively manage problem loans.
     With the additional resources devoted to the loan workout area, management has sharpened its understanding of the factors impacting the primary and secondary sources of repayment and collateral support, and has used this information in the risk ratings and other classifications utilized in the computation of the allowance for loan losses. In determining loan specific reserves in the allowance for loan losses, the Company generally assigns average discounts of 20-35% to independent appraisal values, dependent upon loan and collateral type. These discount rates have been adjusted upward in recent periods based upon the rapid deterioration in the current Chicago commercial real estate market. As a result, although the Company’s allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans ratio dropped to 43% as of September 30, 2009, from a range of 58-62% during December 2008 through June 2009, specific reserves to loans analyzed for possible impairment increased to 20% from 7% as of December 31, 2008 and 15% as of June 30, 2009.
     In the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a provision for loan losses of $36.7 million and recognized net loan charge-offs totaling $17.1 million. Nonaccrual loans increased $98.9 million compared to the prior quarter to $193.9 million, or 7.9 percent of loans. As nonaccrual loans have increased throughout 2009, the provision for loan losses has been double net charge-offs for each quarter reflecting this deterioration and the ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans increased significantly to 3.40% at September 30, 2009, from 2.50% at June 30, 2009 and 1.58% at September 30, 2008.
     Management computes and provides to the Board of Directors various allowance for loan loss and other credit quality ratios as one tool to assist in comparing and understanding changes from previous periods and to the relative performance of its peers. These reviews are performed to better understand changes in credit quality over time and to determine the reasonableness of the level of the allowance for loan losses. Although these ratios provide useful benchmarks, this analysis is just one tool used to determine that the level of the allowance for loan losses is adequate.
     There are many factors affecting the allowance for loan losses; some are quantitative while others require qualitative judgment. The process for determining the allowance (which management believes adequately considers all of the factors which potentially result in credit losses) includes subjective elements and, therefore, the allowance may be susceptible to significant change. To the extent actual outcomes differ

PAGE 44


Table of Contents

from management estimates, additional provisions for loan losses could be required that may adversely affect the Company’s earnings or financial position in future periods.
     Key lending personnel have been re-assigned to the Company’s special assets (loan workout) group in the second quarter of 2009. The Bank has devoted additional resources to its workout unit and engaged an independent firm to actively manage problem loans.
Nonaccrual Loans and Nonperforming Assets
     Nonaccrual loans increased by $132.8 million to $193.9 million at September 30, 2009 from December 31, 2008. Nonperforming assets were $214.9 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $84.1 million at December 31, 2008. The Company had $11.0 million in troubled-debt restructuring to one borrower as of December 31, 2008 which went to nonaccrual status during the third quarter of 2009.
     The following table sets forth information on the Company’s nonaccrual loans and nonperforming assets as of the indicated dates.
                         
    September 30,     December 31,     June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
                       
Nonaccrual loans:
                       
Commercial and industrial
  $ 23,653     $ 3,559     $ 13,038  
Commercial real estate — non-owner occupied
    56,715       10,310       26,836  
Commercial real estate — owner occupied
    22,423       14,244       17,611  
Construction
    55,920       20,726       24,444  
Vacant land
    24,962       6,550       5,456  
 
                 
Total commercial and commercial real estate
    183,673       55,389       87,385  
Other consumer
    8,032       5,315       5,584  
Home equity
    2,172       400       2,054  
 
                 
Total consumer
    10,204       5,715       7,638  
 
                 
Total nonaccrual loans
    193,877       61,104       95,023  
 
                 
 
                       
Trouble debt restructured loans (commercial real estate — non-owner occupied)
          11,006       11,006  
 
                 
Total nonperforming loans
    193,877       72,110       106,029  
 
                 
 
                       
Foreclosed properties
    20,980       12,018       19,588  
 
                 
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 214,857     $ 84,128     $ 125,617  
 
                 
 
                       
Nonaccrual loans to loans
    7.90 %     2.43 %     3.71 %
Nonperforming assets to loans and foreclosed properties
    8.68       3.34       4.87  
Nonperforming assets to assets
    6.06       2.36       3.52  
There were no impaired and other loans 90 days past due and accruing at September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, or September 30, 2008.
     Nonaccrual commercial loans increased by $20.1 million from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009, in part due to the following relationships:
  a $6.2 million loan relationship secured by business assets and retail and office buildings to a company that markets to real estate agents and brokers;
 
  a $6.5 million loan to a company that markets to real estate agents and brokers that has been negatively affected by the real estate downturn;
 
  a $2.8 million loan relationship with an energy company currently operating under a forbearance agreement;
 
  a $2.8 million loan relationship with a full-service tradeshow display company where the recent death of the principal caused a disruption in its business operations. This borrower is currently operating under a forbearance agreement;
 
  a $2.8 million ($0.6 million commercial and industrial and $2.2 million commercial real estate) loan relationship with a full-service tradeshow display company secured by business assets where the recent death of the principal caused a disruption in its business operations. This borrower is currently operating under a forbearance agreement; and

PAGE 45


Table of Contents

  a $0.8 million loan relationship secured by retail and office properties to a banker.
     Nonaccrual commercial real estate and construction loans increased by $108.2 million from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009, due in large part to the following relationships:
  a $12.6 million loan relationship related to a construction project for several projects in and near Lake County, Illinois;
 
  a $11.0 million loan relationship with collateral located in a western suburb of Chicago, consisting of improved lots on 25 acres. The property value has declined and there are currently no units under contract. The guarantors have limited liquidity and net worth and continue efforts to raise equity to fund the real estate investment;
 
  a $9.5 million loan relationship that consists of several loans for various commercial properties in Cook County, Illinois. Third party real estate management and marketing firms have been engaged by the borrower. The management company is focusing on stabilizing buildings, renewing leases and seeking new tenants. The properties securing the loans have experienced increased vacancies and resulting decreases in operating income to provide sufficient cash flow to meet contractual loan payments. The guarantor has limited liquidity;
 
  a $8.6 million loan relationship secured with 26 acres of property on in McHenry County. The borrower’s plans to sell portions of the property have taken longer than expected. The guarantor adds only limited financial support;
 
  a $6.5 million loan relationship, of which $2.5 million has been charged off, secured with a project located in Cook County experiencing slow sales. The properties securing the loans have not sold with the borrower now renting properties at a level that is not sufficient to meet contractual loan payments. There are multiple guarantors who have limited liquidity;
 
  a $5.3 million loan relationship secured with property where the development has stalled and the guarantor is considering alternative strategies to sell or liquidate the assets. The guarantor is currently providing contractual payments; however, in the future their liquidity position will no longer enable them to continue to meet loan repayment terms;
 
  a $4.9 million loan relationship to a residential homebuilder originated in 2003 for a commercial property in a western suburb of Chicago which has been stalled due to on-going litigation with the local municipality. Total credit exposure to this customer is $8.6 million;
 
  a $4.1 million loan relationship secured by three single family residences with a contractor for the development of those properties in northern suburbs of Chicago which have been slow to sell; and
 
  a $2.4 million ($1.5 million commercial real estate and $0.9 million vacant land) loan relationship secured by single and multi-family residences and vacant land impacted by local economic conditions.
     In addition to the loans summarized above, at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had $74.8 million and $71.0 million of loans that are currently performing, which, however, have been internally assigned higher credit risk ratings. The higher risk ratings are primarily due to internally identified specific or collective credit characteristics including decreased capacity to repay loan obligations due to adverse market conditions, a lack of borrower or guarantor’s capital capacity and reduced collateral valuations securing

PAGE 46


Table of Contents

the loans as a secondary source of repayment. These loans continue to accrue interest. Management does not expect losses on these loans, but recognizes that a higher level of scrutiny is prudent under the circumstances.
     Foreclosed properties were $21.0 million at September 30, 2009, an increase of $9.0 million compared to year end mainly due to three new properties: $5.1 million related to multiple properties including vacant land parcels and an office building, $995,000 related to residential property, and $913,000 related to commercial and residential properties. Certain foreclosed properties were written down to current fair value less costs to sell during the third quarter of 2009 and a corresponding charge of $2.6 million was recorded in foreclosed properties expense.
Securities
     The Company manages its securities portfolio to provide a source of both liquidity and earnings. The investment policy is developed in conjunction with established asset/liability committee directives. The investment policy is reviewed by senior management of the Company in terms of its objectives, investment guidelines and consistency with overall Company performance and risk management goals. The investment policy is formally reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors. The asset/liability committee of is responsible for reporting and monitoring compliance with the investment policy. Reports are provided to the asset/liability committee and the Board of Directors of the Company on a regular basis.
     The following tables set forth the composition of the Company’s securities portfolio by major category as of September 30, 2009. No securities classified as held-to-maturity were held at September 30, 2009.
                         
    Available-for-Sale  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
                    % of  
    Amortized     Fair     Amortized  
    Cost     Value     Cost  
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury
  $ 451,785     $ 451,792       73.1 %
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    212       217       0.0  
Mortgage-backed securities:
                       
U.S. government agencies — residential (1)
    147,043       147,003       23.8  
U.S. government-sponsored entities (2)
    1,783       1,796       0.3  
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities (3)
    2,749       3,871       0.4  
Corporate and other debt securities
    14,979       10,864       2.4  
 
                 
Total
  $ 618,551     $ 615,543       100.0 %
 
                 
 
(1)   Includes obligations of GNMA.
 
(2)   Includes obligations of FHLMC.
 
(3)   Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
     Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with related unrealized net gains or losses, net of deferred income taxes, recorded as an adjustment to other comprehensive loss. At September 30, 2009, unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale were $3.0 million compared to unrealized losses of $2.4 million, or $1.4 million net of taxes, at December 31, 2008. A deferred income tax adjustment to the carrying value was not recorded as a result of the Company’s tax position at September 30, 2009.
     During the second quarter of 2009, the Company repositioned its securities portfolio to lower capital requirements associated with higher risk-weighted assets, restructure expected cash flows, reduce credit risk, and enhance the Bank’s asset sensitivity. The Company sold $538.1 million of its securities portfolio with an average yield of 3.94% and average life of slightly over two years. The securities sold included U.S. government-sponsored entities debentures, mortgage-backed securities, and municipal bonds. These securities were sold in the open market at a net gain of $4.3 million. The Company purchased $571.0 million of U.S.

PAGE 47


Table of Contents

Treasury bills and Government National Mortgage Association mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on these securities is 0.43% with an average life of less than six months. The Company reinvested and will continue to reinvest into higher-yielding securities as opportunities present themselves.
     As of June 30, 2009, the Company still held $27.6 million in five securities, including municipal bonds and U.S. government-sponsored entities mortgage-backed securities, that were ear-marked for sale under this portfolio repositioning program. Consistent with that program and the Company’s stated intent to sell these securities, and the Company recognized a $740,000 other-than-temporary impairment charge during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, the Company continued to hold two of the five securities with balances totaling $2.0 million, which included a municipal bond and a mortgage-backed security of a U.S. government-sponsored entity that were identified for sale under this portfolio repositioning program, which were not impaired as of that date. The three securities sold during the third quarter resulted in a net gain of $136,000.
     During the second quarter of 2009, as a part of its repositioning program, the Company sold its entire portfolio of securities held-to-maturity of $27.7 million at a net gain of $117,000.
     Securities available-for-sale decreased by $6.4 million to $615.5 million at September 30, 2009 from December 31, 2008. Set forth below are other highlights of the securities portfolio.
  U.S. Treasury and obligations of U.S. government-sponsored entities increased by $186.4 million to $451.8 million, or 73.1% of the portfolio, at September 30, 2009 compared to $265.4 million at year end. At September 30, 2009, the Company’s holdings in this category consisted of only U.S. Treasury bills with maturities of less than four months.
  U.S. government agency and government-sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities decreased $134.9 million, from $283.7 million at December 31, 2008 to $148.8 million at September 30, 2009.
  Equity securities increased $2.9 million to $3.9 million at September 30, 2009 from December 31, 2008 as a result of the increase in fair market value.
  Corporate and other debt securities decreased by $4.4 million to $10.9 million at September 30, 2009 from $15.2 million at December 31, 2008 as a result of a sale transaction.
  The securities portfolio does not contain any sub-prime or Alt-A mortgage-backed securities.
     Certain available-for-sale securities were temporarily impaired at September 30, 2009, primarily due to changes in interest rates as well as current economic conditions that appear to be cyclical in nature. With respect to the largest unrealized loss position, the Company has approximately 155.8% senior collateral coverage related to this security. The unrealized losses on equity securities relate to the preferred equity securities issued by FNMA which were rated Ca and C by Moody’s and S&P, respectively, as of September 30, 2009. The dividend on these equity securities were suspended beginning in late 2008.
     The Company does not intend to sell nor would it be required to sell the temporarily impaired securities before recovering their amortized cost. See Note 5 — Securities to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for more details.
Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance
     During the second quarter of 2009, the Company liquidated its entire $85.8 million investment in bank owned life insurance in order to reduce the Company’s investment risk and risk-weighted assets, which favorably impacted the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios. The $16.3 million increase in cash surrender value of

48


Table of Contents

the policies since the time of purchase was treated as ordinary income for tax purposes. Additionally, a 10% IRS excise tax was incurred as a result of the liquidation. The Company recorded a tax expense of $8.1 million in the second quarter of 2009 for this transaction.
Goodwill
     Goodwill was $78.9 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Consistent with established policy, an annual review for goodwill impairment as of September 30, 2009 was conducted with the assistance of a nationally recognized third party valuation specialist. Based upon that review, the Company determined that the $78.9 million goodwill recorded on the September 30, 2009 balance sheet was not impaired.
     As a result of our previous annual test performed at September 30, 2008, the Company determined goodwill was impaired and recorded an $80.0 million impairment to reduce the goodwill balance to $78.9 million. Under the authoritative guidance for intangibles — goodwill and other (ASC 350), a goodwill impairment test could be triggered between annual testing dates if an event occurred or circumstances changed that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of goodwill below the carrying amount. During each of the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, management considered whether events and circumstances would require an interim test of goodwill impairment. Management concluded that it was not more likely than not that these events and changes in circumstances, both individually and in the aggregate, reduced the fair value of the Company’s single reporting unit below its carrying amount. Management’s analysis was based on and considered changes in the key indicators and inputs consistent with those included in our previous annual review such as stock price, estimated control premium, future available cash flows, market multiples, business strategy, credit quality metrics, loan growth, core deposits and regulatory capital requirements along with interest rates, credit spreads and collateral values.
     Following is a summary of the methodologies employed to conduct the Company’s testing at September 30, 2009, the underlying assumptions and related rationale in the context of current facts and circumstances, and how the methodologies employed compared with those used in the prior year test.
     The Company operates in one operating segment, community banking, as defined in the authoritative guidance for segment reporting (ASC 280) and currently does not internally report its operating income below that level or provide such information to its CEO, the company’s chief operating decision maker. For this reason, the Company performs its goodwill impairment test as one reporting unit at the consolidated Company level.
     The methods for estimating the value of the Company under Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test included a weighted average of the discounted cash flow method, the guideline company method and the guideline transaction method. The discounted cash flow method computes the discounted value of both projected annual cash flows and an assumed terminal value. The guideline company and guideline transaction methods use publicly available information on selected peer banks and recent sales of controlling interests in comparable banks to estimate the fair value of the Company. This process allows the Company to determine an appropriate implied control premium which serves to adjust the Company’s market capitalization to an estimated fair value utilized in connection with the Company’s annual goodwill impairment evaluation. The Company used the discounted cash flow method under the income approach weighted at 50%, the guideline public company method weighted at 30% and the guideline transaction method weighted at 20%. The weightings were determined by professional judgment based upon the relative strengths of each of the three methods as it relates to the quality and quantity of available and verifiable information.
     Management worked closely with the third party valuation specialist throughout the valuation process. Management provided necessary information to this third party and reviewed the methodologies and assumptions used including loan and deposit growth, regulatory capital requirements and the Company’s business strategy.
     A reconciliation was performed of the fair value estimate to the Company’s publicly traded market capitalization using the thirty day average closing prices of its common and preferred stock through the valuation date. The implied control premium derived by comparing the Company’s market capitalization to the Step 1 fair value estimate was determined to be within a reasonable range of actual control premiums observed in recently completed transactions in an industry peer group. The results of this reconciliation supported the reasonableness of the fair value estimate used in the goodwill impairment test.

49


Table of Contents

     In Step 1 of the analysis, it was determined that the fair value estimate was less than the carrying value of the single reporting unit. However, in Step 2 of the test it was determined that the decline in the fair value was attributable to a decline in the fair values of the assets of the single reporting unit and an increase in the fair values of liabilities, not to a decline in the value of the goodwill. In general, as a result of the Step 2 analysis, management concluded the decrease in the fair value is primarily attributable to prolonged weak economic conditions and the impact these conditions have had on the fair value of the Company’s loan portfolio and decreases in market interest rates.. The decline in interest rates caused the increase in the fair value of borrowings structured in previous periods when market interest rates were higher. These two factors more than account for the drop in the Company’s fair value, leaving goodwill unimpaired. A discussion of the Step 2 test assumptions, methods and results is presented below.
     In Step 2 of the test, the Company estimated the fair value of assets and liabilities in the same manner as if a purchase of the reporting unit was taking place from a market participant perspective, which includes estimating the fair value of other intangibles. The fair value estimation methodology selected for the Company’s most significant assets and liabilities was based on the Company’s observations and knowledge of methodologies typically and currently utilized by market participants, the structure and characteristics of the asset and liability in terms of cash flows and collateral, and the availability and reliability of significant inputs required for a selected methodology and comparative data to evaluate the outcomes. Specifically, the Company selected the income approach for performing loans, retail certificates of deposit, core deposit intangibles, and borrowings, and the market approach for branch properties. The Company estimated fair values separately for nonaccrual loans and loans 60-89 days past due. The income approach was deemed appropriate for the assets and liabilities noted above due to the limited current comparable market transaction data available. The market approach was deemed appropriate for the branch properties and foreclosed properties due to the nature of the underlying real and personal property. In Step 2, the Company did not use multiple approaches to estimate the fair value of any given asset or liability category; therefore, no weightings were incorporated into the Company’s methodology in this step.
     Net loans were $2.4 billion or 66.9% of Company assets as of September 30, 2009. The estimated fair value of net loans was $86.8 million or 3.7% below book value. In computing this estimated fair value, performing loans were separated into fixed and variable components, floors and collateral coverage ratios were considered, and appropriate comparable market discount rates were used to compute fair values using a discounted cash flow approach. A 40% discount was applied to nonaccrual loans based upon recent Company charge-off experience and a 10% discount was applied to loans 60-89 days past due and accruing.
     The core deposit intangible asset fair value was estimated by computing the expected future cost savings from holding low cost deposits and resulted in a fair value estimate $12.3 million above book value. Estimated fair value for the Company’s branch facilities was $7.1 million above book value based upon values determined from the most recent appraisals received adjusted for estimated property value declines from appraisal dates to September 30, 2009.
     The fair values of the Company’s liabilities were estimated using price estimates from a nationally known dealer for 82% of borrowings, and discounted cash flows reflecting the effects of credit spreads for the remaining borrowings and time and brokered deposits. The fair value estimate for all liabilities was $41.3 million above book carrying value. Time and brokered deposits were determined to have a net fair value $14.7 million over book carrying value and borrowings accounted for the remaining $26.6 million.
     Although Step 1 of the impairment test showed the fair value of stockholder’s equity was $88.2 million below the book carrying value, thereby requiring Step 2 testing, the Step 2 results indicated the estimated fair values of other assets and liabilities net were $113.0 million below the book carrying amounts and therefore none of that decrease was attributable to the $78.6 million of goodwill on the books as of at September 30, 2009.
     Material assumptions used in the fair value estimate include projected earnings, projected balance sheet and capital levels, effective tax rates, market discount rates, terminal residual values, composition of market comparables and the weighting of computational method results in Step 1 testing. Changes in any of these assumptions can have a material effect on the fair value used in the goodwill impairment evaluation. In particular, changes in projected earnings and market bank stock levels have a material effect on the Step 1 estimated fair values. As a financial institution, the fair value estimates in Step 2 are extremely sensitive to changes in market interest rates and credit spreads, especially on the values of longer term fixed rate assets and liabilities. As noted above, net loans represented 66.9% of total assets as of September 30, 2009. Using the September 30, 2009 impairment study values, a 1% change in loan fair values up or down due to market interest rates or changes in credit spreads would change the net loan fair value by $23.7 million. Core deposit intangible fair values increase with increases in market interest rates. The fair value of long term borrowings with fixed interest rates increases as market rates decline and decreases as market rates increase.
     The assumptions and methodologies used for annual goodwill impairment testing for September 30, 2009 as discussed above, were similar to those used in the prior year and the same third party valuation specialist was used; however, since interest rates continued to decline, credit spreads had widened and asset quality had materially changed, the evaluation of loan fair values was more granular and involved segregating the loan balances into much finer groups for valuation purposes including segregating 60-89 day past due loans and assigning a 10% discount rate on them.
     In the fourth quarter of 2009 the Company will perform another goodwill impairment test if, in its assessment, it determines any events have occurred or circumstances have changed (triggering events) during that quarter that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of goodwill below the carrying amount.

50


Table of Contents

Deposits and Borrowed Funds
     The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s deposits as of the indicated dates.
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Noninterest-bearing demand
  $ 330,901     $ 334,495  
 
               
Interest-bearing demand
    176,597       176,224  
Money-market
    206,653       208,484  
Savings
    134,539       129,101  
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000
    878,695       689,896  
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more
    403,149       435,687  
Brokered certificates of deposit
    424,655       438,904  
 
           
Total interest-bearing deposits
    2,224,288       2,078,296  
 
           
Total
  $ 2,555,189     $ 2,412,791  
 
           
 
               
Total core deposits (1)
  $ 848,690     $ 848,304  
 
(1)   Consists of noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand, money market, and savings.
     Total deposits of $2.6 billion at September 30, 2009 represented an increase of $142.4 million, or 5.9%, from December 31, 2008. Changes in the Company’s deposits are noted below.
  Noninterest-bearing deposits were $330.9 million at September 30, 2009, $3.6 million less than the $334.5 million level at December 31, 2008.
  Interest-bearing deposits increased 7.0%, or $146.0 million to $2.2 billion at September 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008.
  Core deposits, which consist of noninterest-bearing demand, interest-bearing demand, money market, and savings, increased slightly to $848.7 million at September 30, 2009 from $848.3 million at December 31, 2008.
  Certificates of deposit under $100,000 increased $188.8 million, or 27.4%, from December 31, 2008 to $878.7 million at September 30, 2009, as a result of successful promotions which allowed the Company to build liquidity.
  Certificates of deposit over $100,000 decreased by $32.5 million from December 31, 2008 to $403.1 million at September 30, 2009.
  Certificates of deposits through the CDARS and Internet networks were $139.0 million at September 30, 2009 compared to $41.6 million at December 31, 2008. These networks allow the Company to access other deposit funding sources.
  Brokered certificates of deposit decreased $14.2 million, or 3.2%, to $424.7 million at September 30, 2009 compared to year end 2008. The brokered certificates of deposit are comprised of underlying certificates of deposits in denominations of less than $100,000.
     The Company continues to participate in the FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. This program consists of two components. The first is the Transaction Account Guarantee Program where all

51


Table of Contents

noninterest-bearing transaction deposit accounts, including all personal and business checking deposit accounts, and NOW accounts, which are capped at a rate no higher than 0.50%, are fully guaranteed, through June 30, 2010, regardless of dollar amount. All other deposit accounts continue to be covered by the FDIC’s expanded deposit insurance limit of $250,000 through December 31, 2013. The second component is the Debt Guarantee Program, which guarantees newly issued senior unsecured debt. The Company has not issued any such debt and currently does not plan to issue, any such debt.
     In 2009, the FDIC increased premium assessments to maintain adequate funding of the Deposit Insurance Fund. Assessment rates set by the FDIC, effective March 1, 2009, generally range from 12 to 45 basis points; however, these rates may be adjusted upward or downward if the institution has unsecured debt or secured liabilities. As a result, assessment rates for institutions may range from 7 basis points to 77.5 basis points. These increases in premium assessments increased the Company’s expenses.
     On May 22, 2009, the FDIC board agreed to impose an emergency special assessment of 5 basis points on all banks (based on June 30, 2009 assets) to restore the Deposit Insurance Fund to an acceptable level. The assessment, which was paid on September 30, 2009, is in addition to the increase in premiums discussed above. The cost of this emergency special assessment to the Company was $1.7 million. The FDIC also has publicly stated that at least one additional special assessment for 2009 is probable. On September 29, 2009, the FDIC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that, if adopted, would require FDIC-insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012, but would supplant the proposed additional special assessment for 2009. The Company expects its FDIC insurance expense to increase by approximately $600,000 quarterly starting in the fourth quarter of 2009.
     The Company competes for core deposits in the highly competitive Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area. Competitive pricing has made it difficult to maintain and grow these types of deposits. The level of competition for core deposits is not expected to ease in the near term. The Company’s recent campaigns include certificates of deposit promotions and core product promotions. The Company continues to pursue on-line account opening process to facilitate the growth of core deposit relationships.
     Borrowed funds are summarized below:
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Revolving note payable
  $ 8,600     $ 8,600  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    297,650       297,650  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    340,000       380,000  
Junior subordinated debentures
    60,828       60,791  
Subordinated debt
    15,000       15,000  
Term note payable
    55,000       55,000  
 
           
Total
  $ 777,078     $ 817,041  
 
           
     The Company utilizes securities sold under repurchase agreements as a source of funds that do not increase the Company’s reserve requirements. The Company had $297.7 million in securities sold under repurchase agreements at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. These repurchase agreements are with primary dealers and have fixed rates ranging from 2.76% to 4.65% and maturities of approximately eight to nine years with call provisions ranging from three months to one year. The Company has collateralized the repurchase agreements with various securities totaling $365.6 million at September 30, 2009.
     In addition, the repurchase agreements with one of the repurchase agreement counterparties permit that counterparty to terminate the repurchase agreements if the Bank does not maintain its well-capitalized status. At September 30, 2009, the repurchase agreements with those provisions totaled $262.7 million with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.76% to 4.65%, maturities ranging from approximately 7.5 to 8.5 years, and call provisions (at the counterparty’s option) ranging from three months to one year. Due to the relatively high fixed rates on

52


Table of Contents

these borrowings as compared to currently low market rates of interest, the Bank would incur substantial costs to unwind these repurchase agreements if terminated prior to their maturities. Accordingly, if the Bank does not maintain its well-capitalized status and the counterparty exercises its option to terminate one or more of these repurchase agreements prior to maturity, the associated unwind costs could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
     The Bank is a member of the FHLB. At September 30, 2009, total FHLB advances were $340.0 million compared to $380.0 million at year end. Such advances have fixed rates ranging from 2.45% to 4.47% and maturities ranging from approximately eight to nine years and various call provisions ranging from three months to two years. The Company has collateralized the advances with various securities totaling $115.0 million and first mortgage and home equity loans totaling $237.5 million at September 30, 2009.
Revolving and Term Loan Facilities; Events of Default
     The Company’s credit agreements with a correspondent bank at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of a revolving line of credit, a term note, and a subordinated debenture in the amounts of $8.6 million, $55.0 million, and $15.0 million, respectively.
     The revolving line of credit had a maximum availability of $8.6 million, an outstanding balance of $8.6 million as of September 30, 2009, an interest rate at September 30, 2009 of one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis points with an interest rate floor of 7.25%, and matured on July 3, 2009. The term note had an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis points at September 30, 2009 and matures on September 28, 2010. The subordinated debt had an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 350 basis points at September 30, 2009, matures on March 31, 2018, and qualifies as Tier 2 capital.
     The revolving line of credit and term note included the following financial covenants at September 30, 2009: (1) the Bank must not have nonperforming loans (loans on nonaccrual status and 90 days or more past due and troubled-debt restructured loans) in excess of 3.00% of total loans, (2) the Bank must report a quarterly profit, excluding charges related to acquisitions, and (3) the Bank must remain well capitalized. At September 30, 2009, the Company was in violation of financial covenants (the “Financial Covenant Defaults”).
     The Company did not make a required $5.0 million principal payment on the term note due on July 1, 2009 under the covenant waiver for the third quarter of 2008. On July 8, 2009, the lender advised the Company that such non-compliance constitutes a continuing event of default under the loan agreements (the “Contingent Waiver Default”). The Company’s decision not to make the $5.0 million principal payment, together with its previously announced decision to suspend the dividend on its Series A preferred stock and defer the dividends on its Series T preferred stock and interest payments on its trust preferred securities, were made in order to retain cash and preserve liquidity and capital at the holding company.
     The revolving line of credit matured on July 3, 2009, and the Company did not pay to the lender all of the aggregate outstanding principal on the revolving line of credit on such date. The failure to make such payment constitutes an additional event of default under the credit agreements (the “Payment Default”; the Contingent Wavier Default, the Financial Covenant Defaults and the Payment Default are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Existing Events of Default”).
     As a result of the occurrence and the continuance of the Existing Events of Default, the lender notified the Company that, as of July 8, 2009, the interest rate on the revolving line of credit increased to the default interest rate of 7.25%, and the interest rate under the term note agreement increased to the default interest rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 455 basis points. The Company also did not make a required $5.0 million principal payment on the term note due on October 1, 2009 under the covenant waiver for the third quarter of 2008.

53


Table of Contents

     As a result, and as a result of the other Existing Events of Default, the lender possesses certain rights and remedies, including the ability to demand immediate payment of amounts due totaling $63.6 million plus accrued interest or foreclose on the collateral supporting the credit agreements, being 100% of the stock of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank.
     On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement (“Forbearance Agreement”) with its lender that provides for a forbearance period through March 31, 2010, during which time the Company will continue to pursue completion of its previously disclosed capital plan. Management believes that the Forbearance Agreement provides the Company sufficient time to complete all major elements of the capital plan; however there can be no assurance that any or all major elements of the capital plan will be completed in a timely manner or at all. During the forbearance period, the Company is not obligated to make interest and principal payments in excess of funds held in a deposit security account (which will be funded with $325,000), and while retaining all rights and remedies within the credit agreements, the lender has agreed not to demand payment of amounts due or begin foreclosure proceedings in respect of the collateral (which consists primarily of all the stock of the Bank), and has agreed to forbear from exercising the rights and remedies available to it in respect of existing defaults and future compliance with certain covenants through March 31, 2010. As part of the Forbearance Agreement, the Company entered into a tax refund security agreement under which it agreed to deliver to the lender the expected proceeds to be received in connection with an outstanding Federal income tax refund in the approximate amount of $2.1 million. These proceeds, when received, will be placed in the deposit security account, and will be available for interest and principal payments. The Forbearance Agreement may terminate prior to March 31, 2010 if the Company defaults under any of its representations, warranties or obligations contained in either the Forbearance Agreement or credit agreements (other than with respect to certain financial and regulatory covenants), or the Bank becomes subject to receivership by the FDIC or the Company becomes subject to other bankruptcy or insolvency type proceeding.
     Upon the expiration of the forbearance period, the principal and interest payments that were due under the revolving line of credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers, at the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into will once again become due and payable, along with such other amounts as may have become due during the forbearance period. Absent successful completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would not be able to meet any demands for payment of amounts then due at the expiration of the forbearance period. If the Company is unable to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources of financing on acceptable terms, it may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.
Capital Resources
     Stockholders’ equity decreased $125.6 million from December 31, 2008 to $180.2 million at September 30, 2009, largely due to the $123.1 million net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Total capital to average risk-weighted assets decreased to 7.95% at September 30, 2009 from 10.07% at December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of the decrease in Tier 1 capital. The Bank’s total capital to average risk-weighted assets decreased to 10.17% at September 30, 2009 from 10.54% at December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of the decrease in Tier 1 capital.
     The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors, and the regulators can lower classifications in certain areas. Failure to meet regulatory capital requirements could prompt regulatory action that could have a direct material adverse effect on the financial statements.

54


Table of Contents

     The prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications for banks, including well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is not required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and plans for capital restoration are required.
     The Company was undercapitalized and the Bank was categorized as well capitalized as of September 30, 2009.
     The risk-based capital information for the Company is as follows:
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (In thousands)  
Risk-weighted assets
  $ 2,502,626     $ 2,878,087  
Average assets
    3,650,053       3,590,313  
Capital components:
               
Stockholders’ equity
  $ 180,239     $ 305,834  
Plus: Guaranteed trust preferred securities
    59,000       59,000  
Less: Core deposit and other intangibles, net
    (12,964 )     (14,683 )
Less: Goodwill
    (78,862 )     (78,862 )
Less: Disallowed tax assets
          (32,748 )
Less: SERP prior service cost and decrease in projected benefit obligation
    1,025        
Less: Unrealized (gains) losses on securities, net of tax
    3,007       1,449  
Plus: Unrealized losses on equity securities, net of tax
          (1,117 )
 
           
Tier I capital
    151,445       238,873  
 
           
Allowance for loan losses
    83,506       44,432  
Reserve for unfunded commitments
    2,091       1,068  
Disallowed allowance
    (53,644 )     (9,406 )
Qualifying subordinated debt
    15,000       15,000  
Unrealized gains on equity securities, net of tax
    505        
 
           
Total risk-based capital
  $ 198,903     $ 289,967  
 
           
     Capital levels and minimum required levels:
                                                 
    At September 30, 2009
              Minimum Required   Minimum Required
    Actual   for Capital Adequacy   to be Well Capitalized
    Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
    (Dollars in thousands)
Total capital to risk-weighted assets Company
  $ 198,903       7.95 %   $ 200,210       8.00 %     n/a       n/a  
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
    253,635       10.17       199,432       8.00     $ 249,291       10.00 %
 
                                               
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets Company
    151,445       6.05       100,105       4.00       n/a       n/a  
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
    221,297       8.88       99,716       4.00       149,574       6.00  
 
                                               
Tier I common capital to risk-weighted assets Company
    (30,991 )     (1.24 )     n/a       n/a       n/a       n/a  
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
    221,297       8.88       n/a       n/a       n/a       n/a  
 
                                               
Tier I capital to average assets Company
    151,445       4.15       146,002       4.00       n/a       n/a  
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
    221,297       6.08       145,642       4.00       182,053       5.00  

55


Table of Contents

                                                 
    At December 31, 2008
              Minimum Required   Minimum Required
    Actual   for Capital Adequacy   to be Well Capitalized
    Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
    (Dollars in thousands)
Total capital to risk-weighted assets Company
  $ 289,967       10.07 %   $ 230,247       8.00 %     n/a       n/a  
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
    301,993       10.54       229,244       8.00     $ 286,555       10.00 %
 
                                               
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets Company
    238,873       8.30       115,123       4.00       n/a       n/a  
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
    236,054       8.24       114,622       4.00       171,933       6.00  
 
                                               
Tier I common capital to risk-weighted assets Company
    57,125       1.98       n/a       n/a       n/a       n/a  
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
    236,054       8.24       n/a       n/a       n/a       n/a  
 
                                               
Tier I capital to average assets Company
    238,873       6.65       143,613       4.00       n/a       n/a  
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
    236,054       6.60       143,000       4.00       178,750       5.00  
     On July 28, 2009, the Company announced that it had developed a detailed capital plan and timeline for execution. The capital plan was adopted in order to, among other things, improve the Company’s common equity capital and raise additional capital to enable it to better withstand and respond to adverse market conditions. Management has completed, or is in the process of completing, a number of steps as part of the Capital Plan, including cost reduction initiatives, broadened investment banking support to assist with the Capital Plan, undertaking an offer to exchange the Company’s Series A Depositary Shares for common stock, negotiations to restructure the senior and subordinated debt, and possible capital raising activities. See Recent Developments for more details.
     The Company believes the successful completion of its Capital Plan would substantially improve its capital position; however, no assurances can be made that the Company will be able to successfully complete all, or any portion of its Capital Plan, or that the Capital Plan will not be materially modified in the future. The Company’s decision to implement its Capital Plan reflects the adverse effect that the severe downturn in the commercial and residential real estate markets has had on the Company’s financial condition and capital base, as well as its assessment of current regulatory expectations of adequate levels of common equity capital. If the Company is not able to successfully complete a substantial portion of its Capital Plan, the Company expects that its business, and the value of its securities, will be materially and adversely affected, and it will be more difficult for the Company to meet the capital requirements expected of it by its primary banking regulators.
     The Bank’s primary regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, have recently completed a safety and soundness examination of the Bank. As a result of that examination, the Company expects that the Federal Reserve Bank and the Division of Banking will request that the Bank enter into a formal supervisory action requiring it to take certain steps intended to improve its overall condition. Such a supervisory action could require the Bank, among other things, to: implement the capital restoration plan described above to strengthen the Bank’s capital position; develop a plan to improve the quality of the Bank’s loan portfolio by charging off loans and reducing its position in assets classified as “substandard;” develop and implement a plan to enhance the Bank’s liquidity position; and enhance the Bank’s loan underwriting and workout remediation teams. The final supervisory action may contain other conditions and targeted time frames as specified by the regulators.

56


Table of Contents

     The Company believes that the successful completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan will enable the Bank to meet the requirements of any formal supervisory action with the regulators and will ensure that the Bank is able to comply with applicable bank regulations. However, the successful completion of all or any portion of the capital plan is not assured and if the Company or the Bank is unable to comply with the terms of the anticipated supervisory action or any other applicable regulations, the Company and the Bank could become subject to additional, heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our regulators were to take such additional actions, the Company and the Bank could become subject to various requirements limiting the ability to develop new business lines, mandating additional capital, and/or requiring the sale of certain assets and liabilities. Failure of the Company to meet these conditions could lead to further enforcement action on behalf of the regulators. The terms of any such additional regulatory actions, orders or agreements could have a materially adverse effect on the business of the Bank and the Company.
Liquidity
     The Company manages its liquidity position of the Bank with the objective of maintaining access to sufficient funds to respond to the needs of depositors and borrowers and to take advantage of earnings enhancement opportunities. At September 30, 2009, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $327.4 million. The Bank expanded its liquidity during 2009. Liquid assets, including cash held at the Federal Reserve Bank and unencumbered securities, improved from the second quarter of 2009 by $86.5 million during the third quarter of 2009 to $324.6 million compared to $36.1 million at December 31, 2008.
     In addition to the normal cash flows from its securities portfolio, and repayments and maturities of loans and securities, the Bank utilizes other short-term, intermediate-term and long-term funding sources such as securities sold under agreements to repurchase and overnight funds purchased from correspondent banks.
     The FHLB provides an additional source of liquidity which has been used by the Bank since 1999. The Bank also has various funding arrangements with commercial and investment banks in the form of Federal funds lines, repurchase agreements, and internet-based and brokered certificate of deposit programs. The Bank maintains these funding arrangements to achieve favorable costs of funds, manage interest rate risk, and enhance liquidity in the event of deposit withdrawals. The FHLB advances and repurchase agreements are subject to the availability of collateral. The Bank has collateralized the FHLB advances with various securities totaling $115.0 million and first mortgage and home equity loans totaling $237.5 million and the repurchase agreements with various securities totaling $365.6 million at September 30, 2009. The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet its current and future near-term liquidity needs; however, no assurances can be made that the Company’s liquidity position will not be materially, adversely affected in the future. See “Risk Factors — We may not be able to access sufficient and cost-effective sources of liquidity necessary to fund our operations and meet our payment obligations under our existing funding commitments, including the repayment of our brokered deposits.”
     The Company monitors and manages its liquidity position on several levels, which include estimated loan funding requirements, estimated loan payoffs, securities portfolio maturities or calls, and anticipated depository buildups or runoffs.
     Certain available-for-sale securities were temporarily impaired at September 30, 2009, primarily due to changes in interest rates as well as current economic conditions that appear to be cyclical in nature. The Company does not intend to sell nor would it be required to sell the temporarily impaired securities before recovering their amortized cost. See Note 5 — Securities to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for more details. The Company’s liquidity position is further enhanced by monthly principal and interest payments received from a majority of the loan portfolio.
     The Company continues to seek opportunities to diversify the customer base, enhance the product suite, and improve the overall liquidity position. The Company has developed analytical tools to help support the

57


Table of Contents

overall liquidity forecasting and contingency planning. In addition, the Company has developed a more efficient collateral management process which has strengthened the Bank’s liquidity.
     The Company announced on May 6, 2009, that the board of directors made the decision to suspend the dividend on the $43.1 million of Series A noncumulative redeemable convertible perpetual preferred stock; defer the dividend on the $84.8 million of Series T preferred stock; and take steps to defer interest payments on $60.8 million of its junior subordinated debentures as permitted by the terms of such debentures. Since the May 6th announcement, the Company has begun to defer interest on its junior subordinated debentures. The accrued interest payable on junior subordinated debentures was $1.1 million through September 30, 2009. The Company has no current plans to resume dividend payments in respect of the Series A preferred stock or the Series T preferred stock or interest payments in respect of its junior subordinated debentures.
     The Company’s holding company’s liquidity position is affected by the amount of cash and other liquid assets on hand, payment of interest and dividends on debt and equity instruments issued by the holding company (all of which have been recently suspended or deferred), capital it injects into the Bank, any redemption of debt for cash issued by the holding company, proceeds it raises through the issuance of debt and/or equity instruments through the holding company, if any, and dividends received from the Bank. The Company’s future liquidity position may be adversely affected if one or a combination of the following events occurs: the Bank continues to experience net losses and, accordingly, is unable or prohibited by the Company’s regulators to pay a dividend to the holding company sufficient to satisfy our holding company’s cash flow needs, the Company deems it advisable or is required by the Federal Reserve to use cash at the holding company to support the capital position of the Bank, the Bank fails to remain “well-capitalized” and, accordingly, the regulators require the Bank to obtain prior approval to renew its existing brokered deposits or originate additional brokered deposits, the Bank is required to provide additional collateral against its FHLB borrowings and is unable to do so, or the Company has difficulty raising cash at the holding company level through the issuance of debt or equity instruments or accessing additional sources of credit.
     On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement with the lender under its revolving and term loan facilities, pursuant to which, among other things, the lender agreed to forbear from exercising the rights and remedies available to it as a consequence of certain continuing events of default, except for continuing to impose default rates of interest. The forbearance is effective for the period beginning July 3, 2009 until March 31, 2010, or earlier if, among other things, the Company breaches representations and warranties contained in the forbearance agreement, or the Company defaults on certain obligations under the forbearance agreement or credit agreements (other than with respect to certain financial and regulatory covenants) or the Bank becomes subject to receivership by the FDIC or the Company becomes subject to other bankruptcy or insolvency type proceedings.
     Upon the expiration of the forbearance period, the principal and interest payments that were due under the revolving line of credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers, at the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into will once again become due and payable, along with such other amounts as may have become due during the forbearance period. Absent successful completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would not be able to meet any demands for payment of amounts then due at the expiration of the forbearance period. If the Company is unable to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources of financing on acceptable terms, it may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations.

58


Table of Contents

ITEM 3 — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis
     The Company performs a net interest income analysis as part of its asset/liability management practices. Net interest income analysis measures the change in net interest income in the event of hypothetical parallel shifts in interest rates. This analysis assesses the risk of change in net interest income in the event of sudden and sustained 1.0% and 2.0% increases in market interest rates. The table below presents the Company’s projected changes in net interest income for the various rate shock levels at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. As result of current market conditions, 1.0% and 2.0% decreases in market interest rates are not applicable for either time period as those decreases would result in some interest rate assumptions falling below zero. Nonetheless, the Company’s net interest income could decline in those scenarios as yields on earning assets could continue to adjust downward.
                                         
    Change in Net Interest Income Over One Year Horizon
                                    Guideline
    September 30, 2009   December 31, 2008   Maximum
    Dollar   %   Dollar   %   %
    Change   Change   Change   Change   Change
    (Dollars in thousands)
+200 bp
  $ 16,631       26.04 %   $ 6,274       8.23 %     (10.0 )%
+100 bp
    7,793       12.20       2,850       3.74        
-100 bp
    N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A        
-200 bp
    N/A       N/A       N/A       N/A       (10.0 )
     As shown above, at September 30, 2009, the effect of an immediate 200 basis point increase in interest rates would increase the Company’s net interest income by 26.04%, or $16.6 million. Overall net interest income sensitivity remains within the Company’s and recommended regulatory guidelines.
     In a rising rate environment, yields on floating rate loans and investment securities are expected to re-price upwards more quickly than the cost of funds. Due to a portion of the Bank’s variable-rate loans being at rate floors, yields on variable-rate loans are not expected to adjust upwards as quickly or the full extent as market interest rates.

PAGE 59


Table of Contents

ITEM 4 — CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 240.13a-15(e)). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
     There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PAGE 60


Table of Contents

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES
LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
     This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company and its representatives may, from time to time, make written or oral statements that are “forward-looking” and provide information other than historical information, including statements contained in this Form 10-Q, the Company’s other reports and documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in communications to its stockholders. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from any results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statement. These factors include, among other things, the factors listed below.
     In some cases, the Company has identified forward-looking statements by such words or phrases as “will likely result,” “is confident that,” “expects,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “will continue to,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “predicts,” “forecasts,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential,” “intends,” or similar expressions identifying “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including the negative of those words and phrases. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current views and assumptions regarding future events, future business conditions, and the outlook for the Company based on currently available information. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
     In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company is hereby identifying important factors that could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any forward-looking statements.
     Among the factors that could have an impact on the Company’s ability to achieve the plans, goals, and future events and conditions expressed or implied in forward-looking statements are:
  Management’s ability to effectively manage interest rate risk and the impact of interest rates in general on the volatility of the Company’s net interest income;
  Risks and uncertainties related to the contemplated Exchange Offer and to the Capital Plan, including
    the Company’s ability to successfully execute the Exchange Offer, including securing the exchange of a significant number of Depositary Shares;
    the Company’s ability to successfully implement and achieve the other goals of the Capital Plan, the success of which is dependent on a successful Exchange Offer; and
       whether the Company will need to materially modify its Capital Plan in the future;
  the effect of the recently enacted Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the implementation by the Department of the U.S. Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury”) and federal banking regulators of a number of programs to address capital and liquidity issues in the banking system and additional programs that will apply to us in the future, all of which may have significant effects on us and the financial services industry;

PAGE 61


Table of Contents

  The possibility that the Company’s wholesale funding sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits at maturity and support potential growth;
  Inaccessibility of funding sources on the same terms on which the Company has historically relied if it is unable to maintain its current capital ratings;
  The decline in commercial and residential real estate sales volume and the likely potential for continuing illiquidity in the real estate market, including within the Chicago metropolitan area;
  The risks associated with the high concentration of commercial real estate loans in the Company’s portfolio;
  The uncertainties in estimating the fair value of developed real estate and undeveloped land in light of declining demand for such assets and continuing illiquidity in the real estate market;
  Uncertainties with respect to the future utilization of the Company’s deferred tax assets;
  Negative developments and disruptions in the credit and lending markets, including the impact of the ongoing credit crisis on the Company’s business and on the businesses of its customers as well as other banks and lending institutions with which the Company has commercial relationships;
  A continuation of the recent unprecedented volatility in the capital markets;
  The risks associated with implementing the Company’s business strategy, including its ability to preserve and access sufficient capital to execute on its strategy;
  Rising unemployment and its impact on the Company’s customers’ savings rates and their ability to service debt obligations;
  Fluctuations in the value of the Company’s investment securities;
  The ability to attract and retain senior management experienced in banking and financial services;
  Credit risks and risks from concentrations (by geographic area and by industry) within the Bank’s loan portfolio and individual large loans;
  The sufficiency of the allowance for loan losses to absorb the amount of actual losses inherent in the existing portfolio of loans;
  The failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of the allowance for loan losses and estimation of values of collateral or cash flow projections and various financial assets and liabilities;
  The Company’s ability to adapt successfully to technological changes to compete effectively in the marketplace;
  The effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds, and other financial institutions operating in the Company’s market or elsewhere or providing similar services;
  Volatility of rate sensitive deposits;

PAGE 62


Table of Contents

  Operational risks, including data processing system failures or fraud;
 
  Liquidity risks;
 
  The ability to successfully acquire low cost deposits or funding;
 
  Changes in the economic environment, competition, or other factors that may influence loan demand, deposit flows, and the quality of the loan portfolio and loan and deposit pricing;
 
  The impact from liabilities arising from legal or administrative proceedings on the financial condition of the Company;
 
  The ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company;
 
  The Company’s ability to pay cash dividends on its common and preferred stock and interest on its junior subordinated debentures;
 
  The Company’s ability to restructure payments or comply with the terms of the forbearance agreement;
 
  Possible administrative or enforcement actions of banking regulators in connection with any material failure of the Company or the Bank to comply with banking laws, rules or regulations, or terms of the expected enforcement action;
 
  Possible administrative or enforcement actions of the SEC in connection with the SEC inquiry of the restatement of the Company’s September 30, 2002 financial statements;
 
  Governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative and regulatory changes, that may result in the imposition of costs and constraints on the Company through higher FDIC insurance premiums, significant fluctuations in market interest rates, increases in capital requirements, and operational limitations;
 
  Changes in general economic or industry conditions, nationally or in the communities in which the Company conducts business;
 
  Changes in legislation or regulatory and accounting principles, policies, or guidelines affecting the business conducted by the Company;
 
  The impact of possible future goodwill and other material impairment charges;
 
  The effects of increased deposit insurance premiums;
 
  The Bank’s ability to comply with the terms of an agreement with its regulators (which the Company anticipates entering into shortly) pursuant to which the Bank will agree to take certain corrective actions to improve its financial condition;
 
  The ability of the Bank’s repurchase agreement counterparties to terminate the repurchase agreements if the Bank does not maintain its well-capitalized status and the substantial costs the Bank would incur to unwind these repurchase agreements prior to their maturies;
 
  The Company’s ability absent successful completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan to repay the funds due at the

PAGE 63


Table of Contents

    expiration of the forbearance period;
  The delisting of the Company’s common stock from Nasdaq;
 
  Acts of war or terrorism; and
 
  Other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technical factors affecting the Company’s operations, products, services, and prices.
     The Company wishes to caution that the foregoing list of important factors may not be all-inclusive and specifically declines to undertake any obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements that have been made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
     With respect to forward-looking statements set forth in the notes to consolidated financial statements, including those relating to contingent liabilities and legal proceedings, some of the factors that could affect the ultimate disposition of those contingencies are changes in applicable laws, the development of facts in individual cases, settlement opportunities, and the actions of plaintiffs, judges, and juries.

PAGE 64


Table of Contents

PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiaries are a party other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their respective business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     The Company has updated, as set forth below, the descriptions of certain risks and uncertainties that could affect the Company’s business, future performance or financial condition originally included in Part I, Item 1A of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Additionally, as a result of the adoption of the Capital Plan, the Company has identified certain other risks and uncertainties related to its Capital Plan. These risk factors could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, future results or trading price of the Company’s common stock. In addition to the other information contained in the reports the Company files with the SEC, investors should consider these risk factors prior to making an investment decision with respect to the Company’s securities. The risks described in the risk factors below, however, are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or those that are currently considered to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Risks Related to Our Contemplated Exchange Offer and to Our Capital Plan
The Exchange Offer and other aspects of our Capital Plan will result in a substantial amount of our common stock entering the market, which could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.
     As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately 28,116,312 million shares of common stock outstanding. As part of our contemplated Exchange Offer, we recently filed a registration statement that seeks to register up to 15,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued in the Exchange Offer. Although the exact number of shares of common stock that may be issued is not yet determinable and will be based on a number of factors, if the Exchange Offer is consummated and participation in the Exchange Offer is high, a substantial number of shares of common stock is expected to be issued. In addition, assuming stockholder approval of the increase in our authorized shares of common stock from 64,000,000 to 4,000,000,000, we may issue a substantial number of additional shares of common stock and other equity securities pursuant to our Capital Plan, including to the U.S. Treasury. The issuance of such a large number of shares of our common stock could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. See also “Risks Related to the Implementation of Our Capital Plan —We contemplate issuing a significant amount of common stock to accomplish the goals of our Capital Plan. The issuance of even a portion of the additional Common Stock contemplated under our Capital Plan will be dilutive, potentially significantly, to holders of our common stock.”
The market price of our Common Stock may be subject to continued significant fluctuations and volatility.
     The stock markets have recently experienced high levels of volatility. These market fluctuations have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, the trading price of our common stock. In addition, the market price of our common stock has been subject to significant fluctuations and volatility and may continue to fluctuate or further decline. Factors that could cause fluctuations, volatility or further decline in the market price of our common stock, many of which could be beyond our control, include, among other things:
  changes or perceived changes in the condition, operations, results or prospects of our businesses and market assessments of these changes or perceived changes;

PAGE 65


Table of Contents

  announcements relating to significant corporate transactions, including the Exchange Offer and other possible transactions contemplated by our Capital Plan;
 
  changes in governmental regulations or proposals, or new governmental regulations or proposals, affecting us, including those relating to the current financial crisis and global economic downturn;
 
  the continued decline, failure to stabilize or lack of improvement in general market and economic conditions, including real estate and credit markets;
 
  market assessments concerning the continued listing of our Common Stock on NASDAQ;
 
  the departure of key personnel;
 
  operating and stock price performance of companies that investors deem comparable to us; and
 
  market assessments of the Exchange Offer, including as to whether and when the Exchange Offer will take place.
Future dividend payments and Common Stock repurchases are restricted by the terms of the U.S. Treasury’s current equity investment in the Company as well as the terms of the Company’s outstanding Series A Preferred Stock and trust preferred securities .
     Under the terms of the Company’s agreement with the U.S. Treasury, for so long as any Series T Preferred Stock remains outstanding, the Company is prohibited from paying dividends on its common stock, and from making certain repurchases of equity securities, including its common stock, without the U.S. Treasury’s consent until the third anniversary of the U.S. Treasury’s investment or until the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of the Series T Preferred Stock to third parties. Furthermore, as long as the Series T Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury is outstanding, dividend payments and repurchases or redemptions relating to certain equity securities, including its common stock, are prohibited until all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on such preferred stock, subject to certain limited exceptions. In the event that Midwest is approved for participation in the CAP and uses CAP proceeds to redeem the Series T Preferred Stock, the dividend and repurchase restrictions under the CAP will be applicable to Midwest. The CAP dividend restrictions provide that for so long as the U.S. Treasury owns preferred stock or Common Stock of Midwest that it acquired under the CAP, the maximum quarterly dividend that Midwest will be permitted to pay on its common stock will be $0.01 per share. In addition, Midwest will not be permitted to pay dividends on common stock or any other junior preferred stock or pari passu preferred stock unless all accrued and unpaid dividends on the CAP preferred stock have been paid. The CAP repurchase restrictions provide that for so long as the U.S. Treasury owns preferred stock or Common Stock of Midwest that it acquired under the CAP, Midwest may not repurchase any equity securities or trust preferred securities without the prior consent of the U.S. Treasury.
     In addition, (i) our Certificate of Incorporation currently requires us to pay dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock and on our Series T Preferred Stock before we pay any dividends on our Common Stock and (ii) under the terms of our junior subordinated debentures of the Company, we can not declare or pay any dividends on our Common Stock or preferred stock if we have delayed interest payments on the trust preferred securities issued under the related indenture. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company suspended the payment of dividends on its outstanding Series A Preferred Stock, and Series T Preferred Stock and began deferring interest on its trust preferred securities. Accordingly, we will not pay dividends on our Common Stock to the extent we have not resumed paying dividends on any outstanding shares of Series T Preferred Stock, including all cumulative unpaid dividends, or Series A Preferred Stock and until we begin paying interest on our trust preferred securities and repaying all of the unpaid but accrued interest on such securities.

PAGE 66


Table of Contents

We may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the Exchange Offer.
     A principal goal of the Exchange Offer is to increase our Tangible Common equity (“TCE”) and Tier 1 Common. A view has recently developed that TCE and Tier 1 Common are important metrics for analyzing a banking organization’s financial condition and capital strength. We believe that increasing our TCE and Tier 1 Common will reduce our expenses associated with preferred stock dividends, enhance our standing with our regulators and improve market and public perception of our financial strength. However, given the relatively recent emergence of TCE and Tier 1 Common as important metrics for analyzing the financial condition and capital strength of a banking organization, and the rapidly changing and uncertain financial environment, there can be no assurance that we will achieve these objectives or that the benefits, if any, realized from the Exchange Offer will be sufficient to restore market and public perception of our financial strength.
     In addition, if the Exchange Offer is not completed or is delayed we may be subject to the following material risks:
  the market price of our Common Stock may decline to the extent that the current market price of our Common Stock reflects a market assumption that the Exchange Offer has been or will be completed;
 
  the market price of our Depositary Shares may decline to the extent that the current market price of our Depositary Shares reflects a market assumption that the Exchange Offer has been or will be completed; and
 
  we may not be able to increase our TCE or Tier 1 Common and thus fail to increase a key measure of financial strength as viewed by our regulators and the market.
We contemplate issuing a significant amount of Common Stock to accomplish the goals of our Capital Plan. The issuance of even a portion of the additional Common Stock contemplated under our Capital Plan will be dilutive, potentially significantly, to holders of our Common Stock.
     Our Capital Plan contemplates various methods of issuing additional amounts of common equity in order to improve our capital position, in addition to issuing shares as part of an Exchange Offer, including:
  seeking an investment by the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the CAP that would be used to exchange our existing Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series T, with an aggregate liquidation preference of $84,784,000 (the “Series T Preferred Stock”), which is currently held by the U.S. Treasury, for another class of mandatory convertible preferred stock to be issued to the U.S. Treasury under the CAP, and to thereafter convert this new class of preferred stock into shares of Common Stock, subject to regulatory approval;
 
  negotiating with our primary lender to restructure $55.0 million of senior debt and $15.0 million of subordinated debt; and
 
  engaging in one or more private and/or public offerings of common and/or convertible preferred stock.
     Any one of the foregoing events, if affected, would further dilute holders of our Common Stock.
     In addition, in connection with purchasing the Series T Preferred Stock, the U.S. Treasury received a warrant to purchase 4,282,020 shares of our Common Stock at an initial per share exercise price of $2.97, subject to adjustment, which expires ten years from the issuance date. Even if we were to redeem the Series T Preferred Stock, there is no assurance that this warrant will be fully retired, and therefore that it will not be exercised, prior to its expiration date. The issuance of additional Common Stock or common equivalent securities in future equity offerings, to the U.S. Treasury or otherwise, or as a result of the exercise of the warrant the U.S. Treasury holds will dilute the ownership interest of our existing common stockholders. In

PAGE 67


Table of Contents

addition, the terms of the warrant we issued to the U.S. Treasury under the CPP provides that, if we issue Common Stock or securities convertible or exercisable into, or exchangeable for, Common Stock at a price that is less than 90% of the market price of such shares on the last trading day preceding the date of the agreement to sell such shares, the number and the per share price of Common Stock to be purchased pursuant to the warrant will be adjusted pursuant to its terms.
     There can be no assurances that we will not in the future determine that it is necessary or advisable to issue additional shares of Common Stock, securities convertible into or exchangeable for Common Stock or common equivalent securities to fund strategic initiatives or other business needs or to build additional capital, whether as a result of a modification of our Capital Plan or in addition to the actions contemplated by our Capital Plan. The market price of our Common Stock could decline as a result of the Exchange Offer or any of the other exchanges or capital raising activities contemplated by our Capital Plan, as well as other sales of Common Stock or similar securities in the market thereafter, or the perception that such sales could occur. We may also choose to issue securities convertible into or exercisable for our Common Stock and such securities may contain anti-dilution provisions. Such anti-dilution adjustment provisions may have a further dilutive effect on other holders of our Common Stock.
Exchanging our Series T Preferred Stock for mandatory convertible preferred shares under the CAP is likely to impose additional restrictions on operations and could adversely affect liquidity.
     If we are permitted to participate in and issue mandatory convertible preferred shares under the CAP, we likely will be subject to additional conditions and limitations related to executive compensation and corporate governance as well as new public reporting obligations. Many of our competitors will not be subject to these restrictions and therefore may gain a competitive advantage.
     Furthermore, the CAP mandatory convertible preferred shares, if issued, would accrue cumulative dividends at a rate of 9% per annum until their mandatory conversion to Common Stock after seven years or prior redemption. This would represent an increase in dividend payments over the current CPP rate of 5% per annum (for the first five years), which could adversely impact liquidity, limit our ability to return capital to stockholders and have a material adverse effect on us.
     Exchanging our Series T Preferred Stock for mandatory convertible preferred shares under the CAP, and then converting such shares to Common Stock would result in the U.S. government acquiring a significant interest in us, which may have an adverse effect on operations and the market price of our Common Stock. Likewise, the potential issuance of a significant amount of Common Stock or equity convertible into our Common Stock to a private investor or group of private investors may have the same effect.
     Exchanging a large amount of our Series T Preferred Stock for mandatory convertible preferred shares issued under the CAP, and then converting such shares to Common Stock will result in the U.S. Treasury having the ability to exercise significant influence on matters submitted to stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and certain transactions. The U.S. Treasury has stated that it will issue a set of principles governing its exercise of voting rights with respect to shares of our Common Stock that it may acquire. These principles have not yet been issued. The U.S. Treasury may also transfer all, or a portion, of its shares to another person or entity and, in the event of such a transfer, that person or entity could become a significant stockholder of us. In addition, any issuance of a large amount of common equity or equity convertible into common to a private investor or group of investors may pose similar risks.
     Having a significant stockholder may make some future transactions more difficult or perhaps impossible to complete without the support of such stockholder. The interests of the significant stockholder may not coincide with our interests or the interests of other stockholders. There can be no assurance that any significant stockholder will exercise its influence in our best interests as opposed to its best interests as a

PAGE 68


Table of Contents

significant stockholder. A significant stockholder may make it difficult to approve certain transactions even if they are supported by the other stockholders, which may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Common Stock. As noted above, the U.S. Treasury has not yet issued guidelines outlining how it will exercise its voting rights if it acquires shares of our Common Stock.
Issuing a significant amount of convertible preferred equity to the U.S. Treasury or issuing a significant amount of common equity to a private investor may result in a change in control of us under regulatory standards and contractual terms.
     Our issuing a significant amount of convertible preferred equity of the U.S. Treasury or obtaining a significant amount of additional capital any individual private investor could result in a change of control for us under applicable regulatory standards and contractual terms. Such change of control may trigger notice, approval and/or other regulatory requirements in many states and jurisdictions in which we operate. A change in control also could limit our ability to utilize net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards for tax purposes. We are also a party to various contracts and other agreements that may require us to obtain consents from our respective contract counterparties in the event of a change in control or require us to pay change-in-control payments with respect to our officers and key employees (subject to U.S. Treasury restrictions as a result of our participation in TARP or CAP). The failure to obtain any required regulatory consents or approvals or contractual consents due to a change in control and/or any need to make substantial payments under our employment agreements with our officers and key employees may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Risks Related to Our Business, Operations and Industry
Our results of operations, financial condition and business may be materially, adversely affected if we fail to successfully implement our Capital Plan.
     Our Capital Plan contemplates a number of different strategies intended to reduce our costs, increase our common equity capital and to enable us to withstand and better respond to adverse market conditions. There can be no assurances, however, that we will be able to successfully execute on each or every component of the Capital Plan, in a timely manner or at all, and a number of events and conditions must occur in order for the plan to achieve its intended effect. For instance, one of the key elements of our Capital Plan is to raise $100-$125 million in equity capital. There can be no assurance, however, that private capital will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, we must obtain stockholder approval to allow us to increase our authorized common stock and issue the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock contemplated under our Capital Plan. Such stockholder approval, however, may not be obtained. If we are not able to successfully complete our Capital Plan, we could be adversely impacted by negative assessments regarding our ability to withstand continued adverse economic conditions. Moreover, our business, and the value of our securities will be materially and adversely affected, and it will be more difficult for us to meet the capital requirements expected of us by our primary banking regulators. In addition, even if we succeed in executing on our Capital Plan, our regulators could require us to change the amount or composition of our capital or impose other directives relating to our business.
Our regulators have recently completed a safety and soundness examination of the Bank and we anticipate that the Bank will enter into an agreement with our regulators shortly pursuant to which we will agree to take certain corrective actions to improve our financial condition.
     The Bank is subject to extensive supervision and regulation by federal and state bank regulators. The Bank’s regulators conduct periodic safety and soundness examinations of the Bank to ensure that the Bank meets applicable regulatory requirements. The Bank’s primary regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the Illinois Division of Banking, have recently completed a safety and soundness examination of the Bank.

PAGE 69


Table of Contents

Given the difficult economic conditions that are negatively impacting the Bank as described above, the Company and the Bank anticipate that the Federal Reserve Bank and the Division of Banking will request that the Bank enter into a written agreement requiring it to take certain steps intended to improve its overall condition. Such an agreement could require the Bank, among other things, to: implement the capital restoration plan described above to strengthen the Bank’s capital position; develop a plan to improve the quality of the Bank’s loan portfolio by charging off loans and reducing its position in assets classified as “substandard”; develop and implement a plan to enhance the Bank’s liquidity position; and enhance the Bank’s loan underwriting and workout remediation teams. The final agreement may contain other conditions and targeted time frames as specified by the regulators.
     The Company believes that the successful completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan will enable the Bank to meet the requirements of any formal supervisory action with the regulators and will ensure that the Bank is able to comply with applicable bank regulations. If, however, we are unable to successfully implement the Capital Plan and cannot comply with the terms of a formal supervisory action with the regulators or any other applicable regulations, we could become subject to additional, heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our regulators were to take such additional actions, we could become subject to various restrictions limiting our ability to develop new business lines, and we could be required to raise additional capital, and/or dispose of certain assets and liabilities. The terms of any such additional regulatory actions, orders or agreements could have a materially adverse effect on the business of the Bank and the Company.
Changes in economic conditions, in particular a continued economic slowdown in Chicago, Illinois, could hurt our business materially.
     Our business is directly affected by factors such as economic, political and market conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in government monetary and fiscal policies and inflation, all of which are beyond its control. A continued deterioration in economic conditions, in particular a continuing economic slowdown in Chicago, Illinois, and surrounding areas, has resulted and may continue to result in the following consequences, any of which could hurt or continue to hurt the Company’s business materially:
  loan delinquencies may continue to increase or remain at elevated levels;
 
  problem assets and foreclosures may continue to increase or remain at elevated levels;
 
  unemployment may continue to increase;
 
  demand for our products and services may decline;
 
  low cost or noninterest bearing deposits may decrease; and
 
  collateral for loans made by us, especially residential and commercial real estate, may decline or continue to decline in value, in turn reducing customers’ borrowing power, and reducing the value of assets and collateral associated with our existing loans.
A large percentage of our loans are collateralized by real estate, including our construction loans, and adverse changes in the real estate market may result in losses and adversely affect our profitability.
     A majority of the Company’s loan portfolio is comprised of loans at least partially collateralized by real estate; a substantial portion of this real estate collateral is located in the Chicago market.
     As of September 30, 2009, commercial real estate loans totaled $1.3 billion, or 50% of the Company’s

PAGE 70


Table of Contents

total loan portfolio, and construction loans, including land acquisition and development, totaled an additional $352.1 million, or 13% of its total loan portfolio.
     Adverse changes in the economy affecting real estate values generally or in the Chicago market specifically could significantly impair the value of our collateral and our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. In the event of a default with respect to any of these loans, amounts received upon sale of the collateral may be insufficient to recover outstanding principal and interest on the loans. As a result, our profitability could be negatively impacted by an adverse change in the real estate market.
     Construction and land acquisition and development lending involve additional risks because funds may be advanced based upon values associated with the completed project, which is uncertain. Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, as well as the market value of the completed project and the effects of governmental regulation of real property, it is relatively difficult to evaluate accurately the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value ratio. As a result, construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower to sell or lease the property, rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. If our appraisal of the anticipated value of the completed project proves to be overstated, we may have inadequate security for the loan.
The Company’s allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover actual loan losses, which could adversely affect its results of operations or its financial condition.
     As a lender, the Company is exposed to the risk that its loan customers may not repay their loans according to their terms and that the collateral securing the payment of these loans may be insufficient to assure repayment. The Company has and may continue to experience significant loan losses, which could continue to have a material adverse effect on its operating results. Management makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of the Company’s loan portfolio, which are based in part on:
  current economic conditions and their estimated effects on specific borrowers;
 
  an evaluation of the existing relationships among loans, potential loan losses and the present level of the allowance;
 
  management’s internal review of the loan portfolio; and
 
  results of examinations of its loan portfolio by regulatory agencies.
     The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses in an attempt to cover probable incurred loan losses inherent in its loan portfolio. Additional loan losses will likely continue to occur in the future and may occur at a rate greater than experienced historically. In determining the amount of the allowance, the Company relies on an analysis of its loan portfolio, experience, and evaluation of general economic conditions. If the Company’s assumptions and analysis prove to be incorrect, its current allowance may not be sufficient. In addition, adjustments may be necessary to allow for unexpected volatility or deterioration in the local or national economy or other factors such as changes in interest rates that may be beyond its control. In addition, federal and state regulators periodically review its allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to increase its provision for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. Any increase in the Company’s loan allowance or loan charge-offs could have a material adverse effect on its results of operations.
     The Company’s nonperforming assets, which consist of nonaccrual loans, foreclosed real estate and other repossessed assets, may also impact the sufficiency of the Company’s allowance for loan losses. Nonperforming assets totaled $214.9 million as of September 30, 2009, an increase of $146.4 million, or 214%, from $68.5 million at September 30, 2008.

PAGE 71


Table of Contents

     In addition to those loans currently identified and classified as nonperforming loans, management is aware that other possible credit problems may exist with some borrowers. These include loans that are migrating from grades with lower risk of loss probabilities into grades with higher risk of loss probabilities as performance and potential repayment issues surface. The Company monitors these loans and adjusts loss rates in its allowance for loan losses accordingly. The most severe of these loans are credits that are classified as substandard assets due to either less than satisfactory performance history, lack of borrower’s paying capacity, or inadequate collateral.
While the Company attempts to manage the risk from changes in market interest rates, interest rate risk management techniques are not exact. In addition, the Company may not be able to economically hedge its interest rate risk. A rapid or substantial increase or decrease in interest rates could adversely affect its net interest income and results of operations.
     The Company’s net income depends primarily upon its net interest income. Net interest income is income that remains after deducting, from total income generated by earning assets, the interest expense attributable to the acquisition of the funds required to support earning assets. Income from earning assets includes income from loans, investment securities and short-term investments. The amount of interest income is dependent on many factors, including the volume of earning assets, the general level of interest rates, the dynamics of changes in interest rates and the level of nonperforming loans. The cost of funds varies with the amount of funds required to support earning assets, the rates paid to attract and hold deposits, rates paid on borrowed funds and the levels of non-interest-bearing demand deposits and equity capital.
     Different types of assets and liabilities may react differently, and at different times, to changes in market interest rates. The Company expects that it will periodically experience “gaps” in the interest rate sensitivities of its assets and liabilities. That means either its interest-bearing liabilities will be more sensitive to changes in market interest rates than its interest earning assets, or vice versa. When interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice more quickly than interest earning assets, an increase in market rates of interest could reduce the Company’s net interest income. Likewise, when interest-earning assets mature or reprice more quickly than interest-bearing liabilities, falling interest rates could reduce net interest income. The Company is unable to predict changes in market interest rates which are affected by many factors beyond its control including inflation, recession, unemployment, money supply, domestic and international events and changes in the United States and other financial markets. Based on its net interest income simulation model, if market interest rates were to increase immediately by 100 or 200 basis points (a parallel and immediate shift of the yield curve) net interest income would be expected to increase by 12.20% and 26.04%, respectively, from what it would be if rates were to remain at December 31, 2008 levels. The actual amount of any increase or decrease may be higher or lower than that predicted by the Company’s simulation model. Net interest income is not only affected by the level and direction of interest rates, but also by the shape of the yield curve, relationships between interest sensitive instruments and key driver rates, balance sheet growth, client loan and deposit preferences and the timing of changes in these variables.
     As result of current market conditions, the Company’s net interest income simulation model did not test the effects of 1.0% and 2.0% decreases in market interest rates at December 31, 2008 or September 30, 2009 as those decreases would result in some deposit interest rate assumptions falling below zero. Nonetheless, the Company’s net interest income could decline in those scenarios as yields on earning assets could continue to adjust downward. Although the Company is seeking to mitigate this risk by instituting interest rate floors into its variable-rate loan products, continuation of the existing interest rate environment, featuring an historically low absolute level of market rates of interest, could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
     The Company attempts to manage risk from changes in market interest rates, in part, by controlling the mix of interest rate-sensitive assets and interest rate-sensitive liabilities. The Company continually reviews its interest rate risk position and modifies its strategies based on projections to minimize the impact of future interest rate changes. The Company also uses financial instruments with optionality to modify its exposure to changes in interest rates. However, interest rate risk management techniques are not exact. A rapid increase or decrease in interest rates could adversely affect results of operations and financial performance.

PAGE 72


Table of Contents

We may not be able to access sufficient and cost-effective sources of liquidity necessary to fund our operations and meet our payment obligations under our existing funding commitments, including the repayment of our brokered deposits.
     We depend on access to a variety of funding sources, including deposits, to provide sufficient liquidity to meet our commitments and business needs and to accommodate the transaction and cash management needs of our clients, including funding our loan growth. We must also have sufficient funds available to satisfy our obligation to repay any wholesale borrowings we have outstanding, including brokered deposits, when they come due. Currently, our primary sources of liquidity are our clients’ deposits, as well as brokered deposits, federal funds borrowings, the Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window, Federal Home Loan Bank advances and repayments and maturities of loans and securities.
     To the extent our deposit growth is not commensurate with our funding needs, we may need to access alternative, more expensive funding sources, including increasing our reliance on brokered deposits. Addressing these funding needs will be even more challenging if the amount of brokered deposits we utilize approaches our internal policy limits or, if the Bank fails to maintain well-capitalized status, the FDIC requires us to obtain its permission in order to renew any maturing brokered deposits, or if the Federal Home Loan Bank places more stringent requirements on our ability to borrow funds. Likewise, the federal funds market, which is an important short-term liquidity source for us, has experienced a high degree of volatility and disruption since the second quarter of 2008. In 2009, we experienced an increase in deposits that has allowed us to reduce to some extent our reliance on wholesale funding sources for the time being. However, there can be no assurance that this level of deposit growth will continue or that we will be able to maintain the lower reliance on wholesale deposits that we have experienced in the last quarter. There is also no way to determine with any degree of certainty the reasons for the recent growth in our deposits and, hence, whether these deposits are, in whole or in part, permanent or transitory. If the returns in the equity markets continue to improve or FDIC insurance coverage is reduced, some of our deposits could move to higher yielding investment alternatives, thus causing a reduction in our deposits and increased reliance on wholesale funding sources. If in the future additional cost-effective funding is not available on terms satisfactory to us or at all, we may not be able to meet our funding obligations, which could adversely affect our results of operations and earnings.
     Our holding company’s liquidity position is affected by the amount of cash and other liquid assets on hand, payment of interest and dividends on debt and equity instruments issued by the holding company (all of which have been recently suspended or deferred), capital we inject into the Bank, any redemption of debt for cash issued by the holding company, proceeds we raise through the issuance of debt and/or equity instruments through the holding company, if any, and dividends received from the Bank. Our future liquidity position may be adversely affected if a combination of the following events occurs: the Bank continues to experience net losses and, accordingly, is unable or prohibited by our regulators to pay a dividend to the holding company sufficient to satisfy our holding company’s cash flow needs, we deem it advisable or are required by the Federal Reserve to use cash at the holding company to support the capital position of the Bank, the Bank fails to remain “well-capitalized” and, accordingly, our regulators require us to obtain prior approval to renew our existing brokered deposits or originate additional brokered deposits, we are required to provide additional collateral against our FHLB borrowings and are unable to do so, or we have difficulty raising cash at the holding company level through the issuance of debt or equity instruments or accessing additional sources of credit. Our financial flexibility will be severely constrained if we are unable to maintain our access to funding or if adequate financing is not available. If we are required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to support our business, our revenues may not increase proportionately to cover our costs. In this case, our operating margins would be adversely affected. A lack of liquidity and cost-effective funding alternatives would materially adversely affect our results of operations and earnings.

PAGE 73


Table of Contents

     In addition, the agreements with one of the Bank’s repurchase agreement counterparties permit that counterparty to terminate the repurchase agreements if the Bank does not maintain its well-capitalized status. At September 30, 2009 the Bank’s repurchase agreements with those provisions totaled $262.7 million with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.76% to 4.65%, maturities ranging from approximately 7.5 to 8.5 years, and call provisions (at the counterparty’s option) ranging from three months to one year. Due to the relatively high fixed rates on these borrowings as compared to currently low market rates of interest, the Bank would incur substantial costs to unwind these repurchase agreements if terminated prior to their maturities. Accordingly, if the Bank does not maintain its well-capitalized status and the counterparty exercises its option to terminate one or more of these repurchase agreements prior to maturity, the associated unwind costs could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
The Company’s cost of funds for banking operations may increase as a result of general economic conditions, interest rates and competitive pressures.
     The Bank has traditionally obtained funds principally through deposits and borrowings. As a general matter, deposits are a cheaper source of funds than borrowings, because interest rates paid for deposits are typically less than interest rates charged for borrowings. Historically and in comparison to commercial banking averages, the Bank has had a higher percentage of its time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more and brokered certificates of deposit. Within the banking industry, the amounts of such deposits are generally considered more likely to fluctuate than deposits of smaller denominations. If, as a result of general economic conditions, market interest rates, competitive pressures or otherwise, the value of deposits at the Bank decrease relative to its overall banking operations, the Bank may have to rely more heavily on borrowings as a source of funds in the future.
     Changes in the mix of the Company’s funding sources could have an adverse effect on its income. 33% of the Company’s funding sources as of September 30, 2009 are in lower-rate transactional deposit accounts. Market rate increases or competitive pricing could heighten the risk of moving to higher-rate funding sources, which would cause an adverse impact on its net income.
The Company is party to loan agreements that require it to observe certain covenants that limit its flexibility in operating its business; and it has recently breached covenants under its loan agreements, which , as a result, have given its lenders the right to take certain courses of actions that have been and, with respect to unexercised rights, would be significantly detrimental to holders of the Company’s securities.
     Under the terms of an amendment to the Company’s existing $15.0 million revolving credit facility, the Company and the lender previously agreed to extend the maturity of the short-term revolving line of credit until July 3, 2009. Prior to that date, the revolving line of credit bore interest at the 30 day LIBOR plus 155 basis points, with a floor of 4.25%. Currently, the Company has $8.6 million outstanding on the revolving line of credit together with $55.0 million outstanding under a separate term note. These loans are secured by all of the outstanding shares of stock of the Bank.
     The Company is obligated to meet certain covenants under its loan agreements. Recently, the Company has breached certain of its covenants under its loan agreements and has been advised of certain events of default, including as follows:
    The Company advised its lender that its ratio of non-performing loans to total loans was 3.5% at March 31, 2009. In addition, the Company posted a net loss for the first quarter of 2009. Subsequently, the lender notified the Company that it was not in compliance with both the non-performing loans to total loans covenant and the profitability covenant in the loan agreements for the period ending March 31, 2009 (collectively, the “Financial Covenant Defaults”).

PAGE 74


Table of Contents

    The Company did not make a required $5.0 million principal payment due on July 1, 2009. As previously reported, the Company has sought covenant waivers on two occasions since December 31, 2007. The lender waived a covenant violation in the first quarter of 2008 resulting from the Company’s net loss recognized in that period. On March 4, 2009, the lender waived a covenant violation for the third quarter of 2008 resulting from the Company’s net loss recognized in that period, contingent upon the Company making accelerated principal payments under the term loan agreement in the amounts and on or prior to the dates shown below:
July 1, 2009 — $5.0 million
October 1, 2009 — $5.0 million
January 4, 2010 — $5.0 million
     Previously, no principal payments were due under the term loan agreement until its final maturity date of September 28, 2010. This contingent waiver further provides that if the Company raises $15.0 million in new capital pursuant to an offering of common or convertible preferred stock, then the Company will not be obligated to make any of the accelerated principal payments specified above that fall due after the date on which the Company receives such $15.0 million in new capital, until the final maturity date of September 28, 2010.
     On July 8, 2009, the lender advised the Company that the failure to make the required $5 million principal payment on July 1, 2009 constituted a continuing event of default under the loan agreements (the “Contingent Waiver Default”). The Company also did not make the $5 million principal payment on October 1, 2009. The Company’s decision not to make the principal payment, together with it’s previously announced decision to suspend the dividend on its Series A Preferred Stock and defer the dividends on its Series T preferred stock and interest payments on its trust preferred securities, were made in order to retain cash and preserve liquidity and capital at the holding company.
    Finally, the revolving line of credit matured on July 3, 2009 and the Company did not pay to the lender all of the aggregate outstanding principal on the revolving line of credit on such date. The failure to make such payments constitutes an additional event of default under the loan agreements (the “Payment Default”; the Financial Covenant Defaults, the Contingent Wavier Default, and the Payment Default are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Existing Events of Default”).
     As a result of the occurrence and the continuance of the Existing Events of Default, the lender notified the Company that, as of July 8, 2009, the interest rate on the revolving line of credit increased to the default interest rate of 7.25%, and the interest rate under the term loan agreement increased to the default interest rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 455 basis points.
     A breach of any of the covenants under the loan agreements results in a default under the loan agreements. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lender may, among other remedies, (1) cease permitting the Company to borrow further under the line of credit, (2) terminate any outstanding commitment and (3) seize the outstanding shares of the Bank’s capital stock held by the Company which have been pledged as collateral for borrowings under the loan agreements. If the lender were to take one or more of these actions, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s reputation and operations, and investors could lose their investment in the securities.
     On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement with the lender, pursuant to which, among other things, the lender agreed to forbear from exercising the rights and remedies available to it as a consequence of the Existing Events of Default (the “Forbearance”), except for continuing to impose default rates of interest. The Forbearance is effective for the period beginning July 3, 2009 until March 31, 2010, or earlier if, among other things, the Company breaches representations and warranties contained in the

PAGE 75


Table of Contents

forbearance agreement, or the Company defaults on certain obligations under its loan agreements (other than with respect to certain financial and regulatory covenants) or the Bank becomes subject to receivership by the FDIC or the Company becomes subject to other bankruptcy or insolvency type proceeding.
     Although it is not exercising all of its rights and remedies at this time (other than the continued imposition of the default rates of interest on the revolving line of credit and the term loan agreement), the lender has not waived, or committed to waive, the Existing Events of Default or any other default or event of default.
     Upon the expiration of the Forbearance, the principal and interest payments that were due under the revolving line of credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers, at the time the forbearance agreement was entered into will once again become due and payable, along with such other amounts as may have become due during the Forbearance. Absent successful completion of all or a significant portion of the Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would not be able to meet any demands for payment of amounts then due at the expiration of the Forbearance. If the Company is unable to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources of financing on acceptable terms, it may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. Upon liquidation, holders of the Company’s debt securities and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive, and any holders of preferred stock that is currently outstanding and that it may issue in the future may receive, a distribution of the available assets prior to holders of Common Stock. The decisions by investors and lenders to enter into equity and financing and refinancing transactions with the Company will depend upon a number of factors, including the Company’s historical and projected financial performance, compliance with the terms of its current loan arrangements, industry and market trends, the availability of capital and its investors’ and lenders’ policies and rates applicable thereto, and the relative attractiveness of alternative investment or lending opportunities. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise sufficient capital to return to compliance under its existing debt arrangements or pay the loans in full.
Our common stock could be delisted from Nasdaq.
     Our common stock is currently listed on Nasdaq. On September 15, 2009, we received a letter notifying us of our failure to maintain a minimum closing bid price of $1.00 per share on our common stock over the preceding 30 consecutive business days as required by Nasdaq rules. Accordingly, we have until March 15, 2010 to demonstrate compliance by maintaining a minimum closing bid price of at least $1.00 for a minimum of ten consecutive business days. If we do not regain compliance with the minimum closing bid price rule by March 15, 2010, our common stock will become subject to delisting by Nasdaq. In such an event, we may be eligible for an additional grace period by transferring our common stock listing from the Nasdaq Global Market to the Nasdaq Capital Market. To transfer our listing to the Nasdaq Capital Market, we will be required to meet Nasdaq Capital Market’s initial listing criteria, other than with respect to the minimum closing bid price requirement. If we are then permitted to transfer our listing to the Nasdaq Capital Market, we expect that we would be granted an additional 180 calendar day compliance period. If we are not eligible to transfer to the Nasdaq Capital Market or for an additional compliance period, we could appeal Nasdaq’s determination to delist its common stock.
     Although we would have an opportunity to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s minimum bid price requirement during the compliance periods described above, the perception or possibility that our Common Stock could be delisted in the future could negatively affect the liquidity and price of our Common Stock. Delisting would have an adverse effect on the liquidity of our common stock and, as a result, the market price for our common stock might become more volatile. Delisting could also make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital. Although we expect that quotes for our common stock would continue to be available on the OTC Bulletin Board or on the “Pink Sheets,” such alternatives are generally considered to be less efficient markets, and our stock price, as well as the liquidity of our common stock, may be adversely impacted as a result.

PAGE 76


Table of Contents

     Also, in the future we could fall out of compliance with other minimum criteria for continued listing, including minimum market capitalization, minimum stockholders’ equity and minimum public float. A failure to meet any of these other continued listing requirements could result in delisting of our Common Stock.
Markets have experienced, and may continue to experience, periods of high volatility accompanied by reduced liquidity.
     Financial markets are susceptible to severe events evidenced by rapid depreciation in asset values accompanied by a reduction in asset liquidity. Under these extreme conditions, hedging and other risk management strategies may not be as effective at mitigating trading losses as they would be under more normal market conditions. Moreover, under these conditions market participants are particularly exposed to trading strategies employed by many market participants simultaneously and on a large scale, such as crowded trades. The Company’s risk management and monitoring processes seek to quantify and mitigate risk to more extreme market moves. Severe market events have historically been difficult to predict, however, and the Company could realize significant losses if unprecedented extreme market events were to occur, such as the recent conditions in the global financial markets and global economy.
Concern of the Company’s customers over deposit insurance may cause a decrease in deposits.
     With recent increased concerns about bank failures, customers increasingly are concerned about the extent to which their deposits are insured by the FDIC. Customers may withdraw deposits in an effort to ensure that the amount they have on deposit with their bank is fully insured. Decreases in deposits may adversely affect the Company’s funding costs, net income, and liquidity.
The Company’s deposit insurance premium could be substantially higher in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our future earnings.
     The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insured financial institutions, including the Bank. The FDIC charges the insured financial institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund at a certain level. Current economic conditions have increased bank failures and expectations for further failures, in which case the FDIC ensures payments of deposits up to insured limits from the Deposit Insurance Fund.
     On October 7, 2008, the FDIC released a five-year recapitalization plan and a proposal to raise premiums to recapitalize the fund. In order to implement the restoration plan, the FDIC proposed to change both its risk- based assessment system and its base assessment rates. Assessment rates would increase by seven basis points across the range of risk weightings. In December 2008, the FDIC adopted its rule, uniformly increasing the risk-based assessment rates by seven basis points, annually, resulting in a range of risk-based assessment of 12 basis points to 50 basis points. Changes to the risk-based assessment system would include increasing premiums for institutions that rely on excessive amounts of brokered deposits, increasing premiums for excessive use of secured liabilities, and lowering premiums for smaller institutions with very high capital levels.
     On May 22, 2009, the FDIC board agreed to impose an emergency special assessment of five basis points on all banks to restore the Deposit Insurance Fund to an acceptable level. The assessment, which was payable on September 30, 2009, is in addition to a planned increase in premiums and a change in the way regular premiums are assessed, which the FDIC board previously approved. This emergency special assessment for the Company was approximately $1.7 million. The FDIC also has publicly stated that at least one additional special assessment for 2009 is probable. On September 29, 2009, the FDIC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that, if adopted, would require FDIC-insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012, but would supplant the proposed additional special assessment for 2009. These increases in premium assessments and current and

PAGE 77


Table of Contents

future special assessments have increased and may continue to increase our expenses and adversely impact our earnings.
Defaults by another financial institution could adversely affect financial markets generally.
     Since mid-2007, the financial services industry as a whole, as well as the securities markets generally, have been materially and adversely affected by very significant declines in the values of nearly all asset classes and by a very serious lack of liquidity. Financial institutions in particular have been subject to increased volatility and an overall loss in investor confidence.
     The commercial soundness of many financial institutions may be closely interrelated as a result of credit, trading, clearing, or other relationships between the institutions. As a result, concerns about, or a default or threatened default by, one institution could lead to significant market-wide liquidity and credit problems, losses, or defaults by other institutions. This is sometimes referred to as “systemic risk” and may adversely affect financial intermediaries, such as clearing agencies, clearing houses, banks, securities firms and exchanges, with which the Company interacts on a daily basis, and therefore could adversely affect the Company.
     The Company’s ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. As a result, defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services companies, or the financial services industry generally, have led to market-wide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty or client. In addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due us. There is no assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
The widespread effect of falling housing prices on financial markets has adversely affected and could continue to adversely affect the Company’s profitability, liquidity, and financial condition.
     Turmoil in the financial markets, precipitated by falling housing prices and rising delinquencies and foreclosures, has negatively impacted the valuation of securities supported by real estate collateral, including certain securities owned by the Company. The Company has experienced losses of $82.1 million on investments in government sponsored enterprises, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which has materially adversely impacted its capital base. The Company relies on its investment securities portfolio as a source of net interest income and as a means to manage its funding and liquidity needs. If defaults in the underlying collateral are such that the security can no longer meet its debt service requirements, the Company’s net interest income, cash flows, and capital will be reduced.
The value of securities in the Company’s investment securities portfolio may be negatively affected by continued disruptions in securities markets.
     The market for some of the investment securities held in the Company’s portfolio has become extremely volatile over the past twelve months. Volatile market conditions may detrimentally affect the value of these securities, such as through reduced valuations due to the perception of heightened credit and liquidity risks. There can be no assurance that the declines in market value associated with these disruptions will not result in other than temporary impairments of these assets, which would lead to accounting charges that could have a material adverse effect on our net income and capital levels.
If the Company is required to write down goodwill or other intangible assets or if it is required to mark-to-market certain of its assets or further reduce its deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance, its financial condition and results of operations would be negatively affected.

PAGE 78


Table of Contents

     When the Company acquires a business, a portion of the purchase price of the acquisition may be allocated to goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. The amount of the purchase price which is allocated to goodwill is determined by the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired. At September 30, 2009, the Company’s goodwill and identifiable intangible assets were approximately $91.8 million. Under generally accepted accounting principles, if the Company determines that the carrying value of its goodwill or intangible assets is impaired, the Company is required to write down the value of these assets. The Company conducts an annual review to determine whether goodwill and identifiable intangible assets are impaired.
     Under the authoritative guidance for intangibles — goodwill and other (ASC 350), goodwill must be tested for impairment annually and, under certain circumstances, at intervening interim dates. A goodwill impairment test also could be triggered between annual testing dates if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value below the carrying amount. Examples of those events or circumstances would include the following:
    significant adverse change in business climate;
 
    significant unanticipated loss of clients/assets under management;
 
    unanticipated loss of key personnel;
 
    sustained periods of poor investment performance;
 
    significant loss of deposits or loans;
 
    significant reductions in profitability; or
 
    significant changes in loan credit quality.
     The Company’s goodwill and intangible assets are reviewed annually for impairment as of September 30th of each year. This review in 2008 was conducted with the assistance of a third party valuation specialist. In conducting the review, the market value of the Company’s common stock, estimated control premiums, projected cash flow and various pricing analyses are all taken into consideration to determine if the fair value of the assets and liabilities in its business exceed their carrying amounts. On September 30, 2008, the Company recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $80.0 million. This goodwill impairment charge was not tax deductible, did not impact its tangible equity or regulatory capital ratios, and did not adversely affect its overall liquidity position. It is classified as a noninterest expense item. During each of the quarters ended December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, management considered whether events and circumstances would require an interim test of goodwill impairment. Management concluded that it was not more likely than not that these events and changes in circumstances, both individual and in the aggregate, reduced the fair value of the Company’s single reporting unit below its carrying amount. Management’s analysis was based on changes in the key indicators and inputs that were used to determine the fair values at September 30, 2008. The Company also completed its annual goodwill impairment study as of September 30, 2009 and determined that goodwill was not impaired.
     We will continue to assess any shortfall in the Company’s market capitalization relative to its total book value and tangible book value, which management currently attributes to both industry-wide and Company-specific factors, and to evaluate whether any additional adjustments are required in the carrying value of goodwill. If the Company’s common stock continues to trade at a price below book value, the Company may be required in a future period to recognize an impairment of all, or some portion, of its remaining goodwill. The Company cannot assure that it will not be required to take additional goodwill impairment charges in the future. Any impairment charge would have a negative effect on its stockholders’ equity and financial results. If an impairment charge is significant enough to result in negative net income for the period, it could affect the

PAGE 79


Table of Contents

ability of the Bank to upstream dividends to the Company, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity.
     If the Company decides to sell a loan or a portfolio of loans it is required to classify those loans as held for sale, which requires it to carry such loans at the lower of cost or market. If it decides to sell loans at a time when the fair market value of those loans is less than their carrying value, the adjustment will result in a loss. The Company may from time to time decide to sell particular loans or groups of loans, for example to resolve classified loans, and the required adjustment could negatively affect its financial condition or results of operations.
     The Company also is required, under generally accepted accounting principles, to assess the need for a valuation allowance on its deferred tax assets. If, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, the Company would be required to reduce its deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance and increase income tax expense. We recently established a valuation allowance of $60.0 million related to our deferred tax assets, which contributed significantly to our net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. At September 30, 2009, the valuation allowance increased to $76.9 million and our net deferred tax asset was $4.1 million and we may be required to reduce this remaining amount in the future, which would adversely affect our earnings or exacerbate any net loss.
If the Company’s investment in the common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago is other than temporarily impaired, its financial condition and results of operations could be materially impaired.
     The Bank owns common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, FHLBC. The common stock is held to qualify for membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank System and to be eligible to borrow funds under the FHLBC’s advance program. The aggregate cost and fair value of the Company’s FHLBC common stock as of September 30, 2009 was $17.0 million based on its par value. There is no market for the FHLBC common stock.
     On October 10, 2007, the FHLBC entered into a consensual cease and desist order with the Federal Housing Finance Board, now known as the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the FHFA. Under the terms of the order, capital stock repurchases and redemptions, including redemptions upon membership withdrawal or other termination, are prohibited unless the FHLBC receives the prior approval of the Director of the Office of Supervision of the FHFA, the Director. The order also provides that dividend declarations are subject to the prior written approval of the Director and required the FHLBC to submit a capital structure plan to the FHFA. The FHLBC has not declared any dividends since the order was issued and it has not received approval of a capital structure plan. In July of 2008, the FHFA amended the order to permit the FHLBC to repurchase or redeem newly-issued capital stock to support new advances, subject to certain conditions set forth in the order. The Company’s FHLBC common stock is not newly issued and is not affected by this amendment.
     Recent published reports indicate that certain member banks of the Federal Home Loan Bank System could have materially lower regulatory capital levels due to the application of certain accounting rules and asset quality issues. In an extreme situation, it is possible that the capitalization of a Federal Home Loan Bank, including the FHLBC, could be substantially diminished or reduced to zero. The Company’s FHLBC common stock is accounted for in accordance with the authoritative guidance for financial services — depository and lending (ASC 942-325-35). This guidance provides that, for impairment testing purposes, the value of long term investments such as FHLBC common stock is based on the “ultimate recoverability” of the par value of the security without regard to temporary declines in value. Consequently, if events occur that give rise to substantial doubt about the ultimate recoverability of the par value of the Company’s FHLBC common stock, this investment could be deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, and the impairment loss that we would be required to record would cause our earnings to decrease by the after-tax amount of the impairment loss.

PAGE 80


Table of Contents

As a bank holding company that conducts substantially all of the Company’s operations through its subsidiaries, its ability to pay dividends, repurchase its shares, or to repay its indebtedness depends upon liquid assets held by the bank holding company as well as the results of operations of the Company’s subsidiaries the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to other restrictions.
     The Company is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries and it receives substantially all of its revenue from dividends from its subsidiaries. The Company’s net income depends primarily upon its net interest income. Net interest income is income that remains after deducting from total income generated by earning assets the interest expense attributable to the acquisition of the funds required to support earning assets. Income from earning assets includes income from loans, investment securities and short-term investments. The amount of interest income is dependent on many factors including the volume of earning assets, the general level of interest rates, the dynamics of changes in interest rates and the levels of nonperforming loans. The cost of funds varies with the amount of funds necessary to support earning assets, the rates paid to attract and hold deposits, rates paid on borrowed funds and the levels of noninterest-bearing demand deposits and equity capital.
     Most of the Company’s ability to pay dividends and make payments on its debt securities comes from amounts paid to it by the Bank. Under applicable banking law, the total dividends declared in any calendar year by the Bank may not, without the approval of the Federal Reserve exceed the aggregate of the Bank’s net profits and retained net profits for the preceding two years. The Bank is also subject to limits on dividends under the Illinois Banking Act. The Bank will not be able to pay dividends to the Company in 2009 without prior approval of the Federal Reserve.
     If, in the opinion of the federal bank regulatory agency, a depository institution under its jurisdiction is engaged in or is about to engage in an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending on the financial condition of the depository institution, could include the payment of dividends), the agency may require that the bank cease and desist from the practice. The Federal Reserve has similar authority with respect to bank holding companies. In addition, the federal bank regulatory agencies have issued policy statements which provide that insured banks and bank holding companies should generally only pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Finally, these regulatory authorities have established guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by a bank, bank holding company or savings association under their jurisdiction. Compliance with the standards set forth in these guidelines could limit the amount of dividends that the Company and its affiliates may pay in the future.
     The Company’s ability to declare and pay dividends is also subject to:
    the terms of junior subordinated debentures of the Company, pursuant to which it can not declare or pay any dividends or distributions on, or redeem, purchase, acquire or make a liquidation payment with respect to, any of its Common Stock or preferred stock if, at that time, there is a default under the junior subordinated debentures or a related guarantee or it has delayed interest payments on the securities issued under the junior indenture; and
 
    the Company’s outstanding Series A and Series T Preferred Stock, which have preference over the Company’s Common Stock with respect to the payment of dividends as well as distributions of assets upon liquidation, and no dividends on the Common Stock may be declared and paid unless and until dividends have been paid on its preferred stock.
The Company expects to seek or may be compelled to seek additional capital in the future, but capital may not be available when it is needed.
     The Company is required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support its operations. A number of financial institutions have recently raised considerable amounts of

PAGE 81


Table of Contents

capital as a result of deterioration in their results of operations and financial condition arising from the turmoil in the mortgage loan market, deteriorating economic conditions, declines in real estate values and other factors, which may diminish our ability to raise additional capital. Our recently announced Capital Plan also contemplates raising capital in an effort to improve our capital position.
     The Company’s ability to raise additional capital, as part of its Capital Plan or otherwise, will depend on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, many of which are outside its control, and on its financial performance. Accordingly, the Company cannot be assured of its ability to raise additional capital, as part of its Capital Plan or otherwise, or on terms acceptable to it. If the Company cannot raise additional capital, as part of its Capital Plan or otherwise, it may have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations and prospects. If the Company cannot raise additional capital as part of its Capital Plan or otherwise, it may be subject to increased regulatory supervision and the imposition of restrictions on its operations and potential for growth. These restrictions could negatively impact the Company’s ability to manage or expand its operations in a manner that the Company may deem beneficial to the Company’s stockholders and could result in significant increases in its operating expenses or decreases in its revenues.
The Company’s effective tax rates may be adversely affected by changes in federal and state tax laws.
     The Company’s effective tax rates may be adversely affected by changes in federal or state tax laws, regulations and agency interpretations. In this regard, recent changes in Illinois laws may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations. Under prior tax law, the Company enjoyed favorable tax treatment with respect to the dividends it received from Midwest Funding, L.L.C., a captive real estate investment trust, or a REIT. A change in Illinois tax law relating to the deductibility of captive REIT dividends eliminated this tax benefit beginning January 1, 2009, and is likely to increase the Company’s effective tax rate beginning in that year.
     In addition, in connection with the determination of the Company’s provision for income and other taxes and during the preparation of its tax returns, management makes certain judgments based upon reasonable interpretations of tax laws, regulations and agency interpretations which are inherently complex. Management’s interpretations are subject to challenge upon audit by the tax authorities, which have become increasingly aggressive in challenging tax positions taken by financial institutions, including certain positions that the Company has taken. If the Company is not successful in defending the tax positions that it has taken, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
An interruption in or breach in security of the Company’s information systems may result in a loss of customer business.
     The Company relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. Any failure or interruptions or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in its customer relationship management, general ledger, deposits, servicing, or loan origination systems. The occurrence of any failures or interruptions or breach in security could result in a loss of customer business, costly remedial actions, or legal liabilities and have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
     Management regularly reviews and updates our internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of our controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

PAGE 82


Table of Contents

     The Company relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in our customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of the Company’s information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. Additionally, the Company outsources a portion of its data processing to a third party. If our third party provider encounters difficulties or if we have difficulty in communicating with such third party, it will significantly affect our ability to adequately process and account for customer transactions, which would significantly affect our business operations. Furthermore, breaches of such third party’s technology may also cause reimbursable loss to our consumer and business customers, through no fault of our own. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of information systems used to process customer transactions could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company continually encounters technological change.
     The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and to reduce costs. The Company’s future success depends, in part, upon its ability to address the needs of its customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. The Company may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to its customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business and, in turn, its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company’s business may be adversely affected by the highly regulated environment in which it operates.
     The Company is subject to extensive federal and state legislation, regulation and supervision. The burden of regulatory compliance has increased under current legislation and banking regulations and is likely to continue to have a significant impact on the financial services industry. Recent legislative and regulatory changes, as well as changes in regulatory enforcement policies and capital adequacy guidelines, are increasing the Company’s costs of doing business and, as a result, may create an advantage for its competitors who may not be subject to similar legislative and regulatory requirements. In addition, future regulatory changes, including changes to regulatory capital requirements, could have an adverse impact on the Company’s future results. In addition, the federal and state bank regulatory authorities who supervise the Company have broad discretionary powers to take enforcement actions against banks for failure to comply with applicable regulations and laws. If the Company fails to comply with applicable laws or regulations, it could become subject to enforcement actions that have a material adverse effect on its future results.
There can be no assurance that the recently enacted Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and other recently enacted government programs will help stabilize the U.S. financial system.
     On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, EESA, was enacted. The U.S. Treasury and banking regulators have implemented and may continue to implement a number of programs under this legislation and otherwise to address capital and liquidity issues in the banking system, including the

PAGE 83


Table of Contents

TARP Capital Purchase Program. In addition, other regulators have taken steps to attempt to stabilize and add liquidity to the financial markets, such as the FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, TLG Program, which we did not “opt-out” of. However, there can be no assurance that we will issue any guaranteed debt under the TLG Program, or that we will participate in any other stabilization programs in the future.
     The EESA followed, and has been followed by, numerous actions by the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Congress, U.S. Treasury, the FDIC, the SEC and others to address recent liquidity and credit instability crises. These measures include homeowner relief that encourage loan restructuring and modification; the establishment of significant liquidity and credit facilities for financial institutions and investment banks; the lowering of the federal funds rate; emergency action against short selling practices; a temporary guaranty program for money market funds; the establishment of a commercial paper funding facility to provide back-stop liquidity to commercial paper issuers; and coordinated international efforts to address illiquidity and other weaknesses in the banking sector.
     On February 17, 2009, President Barack Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, ARRA, more commonly known as the economic stimulus or economic recovery package. ARRA includes a wide variety of programs intended to stimulate the economy and provide for extensive infrastructure, energy, health and education needs. In addition, ARRA imposes new executive compensation and corporate governance limits on current and future participants in TARP, including the Company, which are in addition to those previously announced by U.S. Treasury. The new limits remain in place until the participant has redeemed the preferred stock sold to U.S. Treasury, subject to U.S. Treasury’s consultation with the recipient’s appropriate federal regulator.
     On February 25, 2009, the U.S. Treasury announced the CAP pursuant to its authority under EESA, applicable to publicly- held companies. CAP consists of two components. First, the U.S. Treasury conducted a coordinated supervisory capital assessment exercise for each banking organization whose assets exceed $100 billion. Second, the U.S. Treasury may purchase mandatory convertible preferred stock from qualifying financial institutions in order to create a bridge to private capital in the future. CAP is supplemental to the various programs enacted by the U.S. Government and does not replace any existing program.
     There can also be no assurance as to the ultimate impact that the EESA, the ARRA, the programs promulgated under these acts and other programs will have on the financial markets, including the extreme levels of volatility and limited credit availability currently being experienced. The failure of the EESA, the ARRA and other programs to stabilize the financial markets and a continuation or worsening of current financial market conditions could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, access to credit or the trading price of our common stock.
     The EESA, the ARRA and the programs enacted under these acts are relatively new legislation and regulations and, as such, are subject to change and evolving interpretation. There can be no assurances as to the effects that such changes will have on the effectiveness of the EESA, the ARRA or on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
     The purpose of these legislative and regulatory actions is to stabilize the U.S. banking system. The EESA, the ARRA and the other regulatory initiatives described above and which may be proposed in the future may not have their desired effects. If the volatility in the markets continues and economic conditions fail to improve or worsen, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
The limitations on incentive compensation contained in the ARRA may adversely affect the Company’s ability to retain its highest performing employees.

PAGE 84


Table of Contents

     The ARRA imposes new executive compensation limits on participants in TARP, including the Company, which are in addition to those previously announced by U.S. Treasury. The ARRA and regulations promulgated under the ARRA contain numerous limitations on the amount and form of compensation that may be paid to the highest paid employees, including restrictions on bonus and other incentive compensation payable to the five executives named in a company’s proxy statement, restrictions on severance payments to the ten highest paid employees, and requirements for the repayment of bonuses in certain circumstances by the 25 highest paid employees. It is possible that the Company may be unable to create a compensation structure that permits it to retain its highest performing employees. If this were to occur, the Company’s business and results of operations could be adversely affected, perhaps materially.
The Company is subject to claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility.
     From time to time, customers make claims and take legal action pertaining to our performance of our fiduciary responsibilities. Whether customer claims and legal action related to our performance of our fiduciary responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to us, they may result in significant financial liability and/or adversely affect the market perception of us and our products and services as well as impact customer demand for our products and services. Any financial liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on our business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company is exposed to risk of environmental liabilities with respect to properties to which we take title.
     In the course of our business, we may own or foreclose and take title to real estate, and could be subject to environmental liabilities with respect to these properties. We may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation and clean-up costs incurred by these parties in connection with environmental contamination, or may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic substances, or chemical releases at a property. The costs associated with investigation or remediation activities could be substantial. In addition, as the owner or former owner of a contaminated site, we may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from the property. If we ever become subject to significant environmental liabilities, our business, financial condition, cash flows, liquidity and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other external events could significantly impact our business.
     Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of war or terrorism and other adverse external events could have a significant impact on our ability to conduct business. Such events could affect the stability of our deposit base; impair the ability of borrowers to repay outstanding loans, impair the value of collateral securing loans, cause significant property damage, result in loss of revenue and/or cause us to incur additional expenses. Although management has established disaster recovery policies and procedures and is insured for these situations, the occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Non-Compliance with USA PATRIOT Act, Bank Secrecy Act, or Other Laws and Regulations Could Result in Fines or Sanctions, and Curtail Expansion Opportunities
     Financial institutions are required under the USA PATRIOT and Bank Secrecy Acts to develop programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering and terrorist activities. Financial institutions are also obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network if such activities are detected. These rules also require

PAGE 85


Table of Contents

financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of customers seeking to open new financial accounts. Failure or the inability to comply with these regulations could result in fines or penalties, curtailment of expansion opportunities, intervention or sanctions by regulators and costly litigation or expensive additional controls and systems. During the last few years, several banking institutions have received large fines for non-compliance with these laws and regulations. We have developed policies and continue to augment procedures and systems designed to assist in compliance with these laws and regulations.
Provisions in the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and its amended and restated bylaws may delay or prevent an acquisition of the Company by a third party.
     The Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and its amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make it more difficult for a third party to gain control or acquire the Company without the consent of its board of directors. These provisions also could discourage proxy contests and may make it more difficult for dissident stockholders to elect representatives as directors and take other corporate actions. These provisions of the Company’s governing documents may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control that some or many of its stockholders might believe to be in their best interest.

PAGE 86


Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
     None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
     None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
     None
Item 5. Other Information
     None
Item 6. Exhibits
     The following exhibits are either filed as part of this report or are incorporated herein by reference:
     
3.1
  Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company, as amended to date (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed July 29, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
 
   
4.2
  Certain instruments defining the rights of the holders of long-term debt of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, none of which authorize a total amount of indebtedness in excess of 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, have not been filed as Exhibits. The Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any of these agreements to the SEC upon request.
 
   
10.1
  Amended and Restated Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. Severance Policy (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed July 29, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
 
   
10.2
  Forbearance agreement dated October 22, 2009 between the Company and M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
 
   
31.1
  Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
 
   
31.2
  Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
 
   
32.1
  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, from the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer.

PAGE 87


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 9, 2009
         
  MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
(Registrant)
 
 
  By:   /s/ Roberto R. Herencia    
    Roberto R. Herencia,   
    President and Chief Executive Officer   
 
         
     
  By:   /s/ JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek    
    JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek,   
    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 
 

PAGE 88


Table of Contents

         
Exhibit Index
     
3.1
  Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company, as amended to date (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed July 29, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
 
   
4.2
  Certain instruments defining the rights of the holders of long-term debt of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, none of which authorize a total amount of indebtedness in excess of 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, have not been filed as Exhibits. The Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any of these agreements to the SEC upon request.
 
   
10.1
  Amended and Restated Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. Severance Policy (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed July 29, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
 
   
10.2
  Forbearance agreement dated October 22, 2009 between the Company and M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank (incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed October 28, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
 
   
31.1
  Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
 
   
31.2
  Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
 
   
32.1
  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, from the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer.

 

Midwest Banc Hlds (MM) (NASDAQ:MBHI)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jan 2025 até Fev 2025 Click aqui para mais gráficos Midwest Banc Hlds (MM).
Midwest Banc Hlds (MM) (NASDAQ:MBHI)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Fev 2024 até Fev 2025 Click aqui para mais gráficos Midwest Banc Hlds (MM).