UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 3)
Filed by
the Registrant
þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o
Check the appropriate box:
o
Preliminary Proxy Statement
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ
Definitive Proxy Statement
o
Definitive Additional Materials
o
Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ
|
|
No fee required.
|
|
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
|
|
1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annex B
Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
501 W North Avenue
Melrose Park, IL 60160
December 3, 2009
Dear Holder of Depositary Shares:
This proxy statement is being delivered to the holders of the
depositary shares which represent a
1/100th interest
in a share of Series A Noncumulative Redeemable Convertible
Perpetual Preferred Stock (the
Depositary Shares
) of
Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
(Midwest)
, in connection with
the Exchange Offer (as defined below). In order to participate
in the Exchange Offer, you will be required to grant your Proxy
Instructions (as defined below) in respect of the shares of
common stock that may be issued to you in the Exchange Offer in
favor of the following proposed amendments to our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation (the
Certificate
)
and the certificate of designation for our Series A
Preferred Stock (as defined below) and the issuance of shares of
our common stock to the United States Department of the Treasury
(USG)
, all of which have been unanimously approved and
declared advisable by the board of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock of
Midwest from 64 million to four billion shares (the
Authorized Share Increase
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
to (i) effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at
any time prior to December 31, 2010 at one of four reverse
split ratios,
1-for-100,
1-for-150,
1-for-200,
or
1-for-250,
as determined by the board of directors in its sole discretion
and (ii) if and when the reverse stock split is effected,
reduce the number of authorized shares of our common stock by
the reverse split ratio determined by the board of directors
(the
Reverse Stock Split
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the voting rights of shares of common stock with
respect to any amendment to the Certificate (including any
certificate of designation related to any series of preferred
stock) that relates solely to the terms of one or more
outstanding series of preferred stock, if such series of
preferred stock is entitled to vote, either separately or
together as a class with the holders of one or more other such
series, on such amendment (the
Preferred Stock
Change
); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the issuance of shares of our common stock to the USG
upon the conversion of the Senior Preferred Stock (as defined
below) into shares of our common stock (the
Common Stock
Issuance
, and together with the Authorized Share Increase,
the Reverse Stock Split and the Preferred Stock Change, the
Common Stock Amendments
); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the requirement that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
full dividends on all outstanding shares of the Series A
Noncumulative Redeemable Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock
(the
Series A Preferred Stock
) must have been
declared and paid or declared and set aside for the then current
dividend period before we may pay any dividend on, make any
distributions relating to, or redeem, purchase, acquire or make
a liquidation payment relating to our common stock or any other
securities junior to the Series A Preferred Stock;
|
|
|
|
if full dividends are not declared and paid in full on the
Series A Preferred Stock, dividends with respect to all
series of stock ranking equally with the Series A Preferred
Stock will be declared on a proportional basis, such that no
series is paid a greater percentage of its stated dividend than
any other equally ranking series;
|
|
|
|
a series of preferred stock ranking equally with the
Series A Preferred Stock cannot be issued without the
approval of holders of the Depositary Shares if the certificate
of designation for such parity preferred stock will provide that
the dividends on the parity preferred stock will
cumulate; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
no dividends shall be paid or declared on any particular series
of preferred stock unless dividends are paid or declared pro
rata on all shares of outstanding preferred stock which rank
equally as to dividends with such particular series
(collectively the
Dividend Blocker Amendment
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the right of holders of Series A Preferred
Stock to elect two directors if dividends have not been paid for
six quarterly dividend periods, whether or not consecutive (the
Director Amendment
and, together with the Dividend
Blocker Amendment, the
Preferred Stock Amendments
and,
together with the Common Stock Amendments, the
Amendments
); and
|
|
|
|
to adjourn, postpone or continue the special meeting if
necessary or appropriate to permit further solicitation of
proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
special meeting to approve the Amendments (the
Adjournment
Proposal
and, together with the Amendments, the
Stockholder Proposals
).
|
The effectiveness of any Common Stock Amendment or Preferred
Stock Amendment is not conditioned on the approval of any other
Common Stock Amendment or Preferred Stock Amendment.
We are soliciting your Proxy Instructions in respect of the
shares of common stock that you will receive if we accept any of
your Depositary Shares representing our Series A Preferred
Stock that are the subject of the Exchange Offer for exchange in
the Exchange Offer.
A special meeting of the holders of our common stock will be
held on Monday, February 22, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., at
Dominican University Priory Campus, 7200 West Division, River
Forest, Illinois, at which time the holders of our common stock
will be asked to consider the Amendments. The record date for
the special meeting will be on or after the settlement date for
the Exchange Offer, which is currently expected to be
January 15, 2010 (the
Record Date
).
Even if holders of our common stock approve the Amendments, the
board of directors reserves the right to elect to abandon any or
all of the Amendments if it determines, in its sole discretion,
that such Amendment is no longer in the best interests of
Midwest and its stockholders.
As described in our preliminary prospectus included in our
registration statement on
Form S-4
(Registration
No. 333-160985),
initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC)
on August 3, 2009 (the
Prospectus
), of
which the enclosed proxy statement is a part, we will not accept
your Depositary Shares for exchange unless you follow the
procedures contained in the letter of transmittal relating to
the Exchange Offer (the
Letter of Transmittal
) to
instruct the Voting Trustee (as defined below) of the Voting
Trust (as defined below) to grant an irrevocable proxy to the
individuals designated by Midwest in the Voting
Trust Agreement (as defined below) to vote to approve each
of the Stockholder Proposals in respect of the common stock to
be issued to you in the Exchange Offer (the
Proxy
Instructions
). If we accept your Depositary Shares for
exchange in the Exchange Offer, your Proxy Instructions will
become irrevocable, and you will not be able to change your
vote.
By tendering your Depositary Shares in the Exchange Offer in
accordance with the Letter of Transmittal, you irrevocably
(i) approve all of the Stockholder Proposals,
(ii) grant your Proxy Instructions to Illinois Stock
Transfer Company, as trustee (the
Voting Trustee
) of the
voting trust (the
Voting Trust
) established pursuant to
the voting trust agreement, dated as of December 3, 2009
(the
Voting Trust Agreement
), (iii) subject to
and effective upon acceptance for exchange of your tendered
Depositary Shares, agree to the terms of the Voting
Trust Agreement and (iv) acknowledge that by tendering
your Depositary Shares, you will become a party to the Voting
Trust Agreement. The shares of common stock issued pursuant
to the Exchange Offer will be delivered to the Voting Trust on
the settlement date of the Exchange Offer to be held in trust.
The Voting Trustee, pursuant to the terms of the Voting
Trust Agreement, will execute and deliver an irrevocable
proxy in respect of such shares of common stock to the
individuals named in the Voting Trust Agreement to vote in
favor of the Stockholder Proposals. The shares of common stock
exchanged for your tendered Depositary Shares will thereafter
within one business day be released from the Voting Trust and
will be distributed to the Depository Trust Company for
distribution to you.
2
Granting your Voting Instruction to approve the Amendments is
important for the success of the capital plan that we announced
on July 28, 2009 (the
Capital Plan
) which is
designed to increase our common equity capital so that we may
meet the current and expected requirements of our regulators,
withstand continued and potentially more adverse economic
conditions and improve our tangible common equity (
TCE
)
and our Tier I Common (see Background of the
Transactions below). We are pleased to report that we have
already made progress in implementing these proposed
transactions (the
Transactions
):
|
|
|
|
|
We sold 84,875 shares of our Fixed Rate Cumulative
Preferred, Series T to the USG for $84.784 million in
December of 2008 (the
Series T Preferred Stock
) and
issued a warrant which allows the USG to purchase
4.282 million shares of our common stock for $2.97 per
share (the
Warrant
) under the USGs Capital Purchase
Program. We are engaged in discussions with the USG to exchange
the shares of Series T Preferred Stock for a new series of
our preferred stock (the
Preferred Stock Issuance
).
Although the USG has expressed its willingness to consent to
such a transaction, the specific terms of any potential
transaction with the USG are subject to further negotiations
between the Company and the USG, and the specific terms are
expected to include conditions the satisfaction of which will be
solely determined by the USG. We anticipate that the new series
of preferred stock will rank senior as to dividend rights,
including cumulative dividend rights, and rights on liquidation,
winding-up
and dissolution to the Series A Preferred Stock (the
Senior Preferred Stock
). Immediately thereafter, we
anticipate that the Senior Preferred Stock will be converted
into shares of our common stock (the
Conversion
). At the
present time, we do not know the number of shares of our common
stock that will be issued to the USG upon the Conversion nor can
we provide any assurance that the Series T Preferred Stock
will be exchanged for the Senior Preferred Stock or that the
Conversion will occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are negotiating with our primary lender to restructure
$55.0 million of senior debt and $15.0 million of
subordinated debt.
|
|
|
|
We are seeking to engage in one or more private
and/or
public offerings of common
and/or
convertible preferred stock.
|
|
|
|
We have commenced an exchange offer (the
Exchange Offer
)
pursuant to which we are offering to exchange newly issued
shares of our common stock for any and all issued and
outstanding Depositary Shares.
|
|
|
|
We have mailed a separate Notice of Solicitation of Voting
Instructions and Special Meeting and accompanying proxy
statement (the
Preferred Proxy Statement
) to holders of
our Depositary Shares, seeking their voting instructions to vote
to approve the Preferred Stock Amendments and the Preferred
Stock Issuance. If you were a holder of Depositary Shares on the
record date for the Preferred Proxy Statement and you are
tendering your Depositary Shares in connection with the Exchange
Offer, you must follow the procedures contained in the Letter of
Transmittal to provide instructions to deliver a proxy to
approve the Preferred Stock Amendments and the Preferred Stock
Issuance in order to have your Depositary Shares accepted for
exchange. For more information, please see the Preferred Proxy
Statement and the Prospectus.
|
We believe that the Amendments will benefit the holders of our
common stock. If the Authorized Share Increase and the Common
Stock Issuance are not approved, we will not be able to convert
the Senior Preferred Stock into shares of common stock. If the
Conversion does not occur, we will not be able to strengthen our
TCE and Tier 1 Common as planned. In addition, if the
Conversion does not occur, we anticipate that adjustments will
be made to decrease the Conversion price and increase the
dividend rate of the Senior Preferred Stock.
We believe the Reverse Stock Split will allow us to restore our
common stock price to a normalized trading level, which will
enhance liquidity. The Reverse Stock Split will also allow us to
reduce certain of our transaction costs (e.g., proxy
solicitation fees). The Preferred Stock Change will provide the
board of directors with important flexibility to adopt
amendments to our Certificate (including certificates of
designation for series of preferred stock) that affect only the
terms of preferred stock, which is consistent with the
boards current flexibility to create new series of
preferred stock.
3
The Dividend Blocker Amendment, if it becomes effective, will
allow us to pay dividends on our common stock even if full
dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock have not been
paid or declared and set apart for payment, which we believe
will enhance the price and liquidity of our common stock. It
will also allow us to issue preferred stock ranking equally with
the Series A Preferred Stock that will be authorized to pay
cumulative dividends without the approval of the holders of the
Depositary Shares. The Director Amendment, if it becomes
effective, will eliminate the possibility that non-exchanging
holders of Depositary Shares could exercise a level of influence
and control over the governance and the management of our
company that is disproportionate to their remaining economic
interest. The Preferred Stock Issuance, if it becomes effective,
will help us increase our TCE and our Tier 1 Common because
upon the Conversion, the shares of Senior Preferred Stock will
be converted into shares of our common stock.
The board of directors has unanimously approved and declared
advisable each of the Stockholder Proposals and unanimously
recommends that you give your Proxy Instructions pursuant to the
Letter of Transmittal to approve each of the Stockholder
Proposals.
The proxy statement enclosed with this letter provides you with
important information about the matters for which we are seeking
your Proxy Instructions pursuant to the Letter of Transmittal.
We encourage you to read the entire proxy statement carefully.
You may also obtain additional information about us from
documents we have filed with the SEC and on our website at
www.midwestbanc.com
. Click on About Us, and
then Investor Relations-SEC Filings.
A copy of
the proxy statement is available at www.envisionreports.com/MBHI
for registered holders and www.edocumentview.com/MBHI for
beneficial owners.
This letter is being sent to you as a holder of Depositary
Shares. As a holder of Depositary Shares, you may only give your
Proxy Instructions (and you will be required to give your Proxy
Instructions) to approve each of the Stockholder Proposals
pursuant to the Letter of Transmittal to the extent that you
tender your Depositary Shares for shares of common stock in the
Exchange Offer. Accordingly, in order to give your Proxy
Instructions in respect of these matters (and in order to be
permitted to participate in the Exchange Offer), you need only
comply with the requirements for participating in the Exchange
Offer set forth in the Prospectus and the Letter of
Transmittal.
If you hold your Depositary Shares through a bank, broker,
custodian or other nominee and wish to participate in the
Exchange Offer, please contact your bank, broker, custodian or
other nominee to instruct it to tender your Depositary Shares in
accordance with the instructions in the Prospectus and the
Letter of Transmittal and grant your Proxy Instructions pursuant
to the Letter of Transmittal. Due to the time required for your
bank, broker, custodian or other nominee to complete the
required actions on your part, we urge you to contact your bank,
broker, custodian or other nominee at least five business days
prior to the expiration date of the Exchange Offer.
Thank you for your continued support of Midwest.
Sincerely,
Roberto R. Herencia
President
Percy L. Berger
Chairman
4
Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
501 West North Avenue
Melrose Park, IL 60160
December 3, 2009
Dear Common Stockholder:
We are writing to you to request that you grant your proxy
authorizing the individuals named on the enclosed proxy card to
vote the shares of common stock that you hold as of the Record
Date (as defined below) to approve the following proposed
amendments to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation (the
Certificate
) and the certificate of
designation for our Series A Preferred Stock (as defined
below) and the issuance of shares of our common stock to the
United States Department of the Treasury
(USG)
. These
proposals have been unanimously approved and declared advisable
by the board of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock of
Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
(Midwest)
, from
64 million to four billion (the
Authorized Share
Increase
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
to (i) effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at
any time prior to December 31, 2010 at one of four reverse
split ratios,
1-for-100,
1-for-150,
1-for-200,
or
1-for-250,
as determined by the board of directors in its sole discretion
and (ii) if and when the reverse stock split is effected,
reduce the number of authorized shares of our common stock by
the reverse split ratio determined by the board of directors
(the
Reverse Stock Split
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the voting rights of shares of common stock with
respect to any amendment to the Certificate (including any
certificate of designation related to any series of preferred
stock) that relates solely to the terms of one or more
outstanding series of preferred stock, if such series of
preferred stock is entitled to vote, either separately or
together as a class with the holders of one or more other such
series, on such amendment (the
Preferred Stock
Change
); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the issuance of shares of our common stock to the USG
upon the conversion of the Senior Preferred Stock (as defined
below) into shares of our common stock (the
Common Stock
Issuance
, and together with the Authorized Share Increase,
the Reverse Stock Split and the Preferred Stock Change, the
Common Stock Amendments
); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the requirement that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
full dividends on all outstanding shares of the Series A
Noncumulative Redeemable Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock
(the
Series A Preferred Stock
) must have been
declared and paid or declared and set aside for the then current
dividend period before we may pay any dividend on, make any
distributions relating to, or redeem, purchase, acquire or make
a liquidation payment relating to our common stock or any other
securities junior to the Series A Preferred Stock;
|
|
|
|
if full dividends are not declared and paid in full on the
Series A Preferred Stock, dividends with respect to all
series of stock ranking equally with the Series A Preferred
Stock will be declared on a proportional basis, such that no
series is paid a greater percentage of its stated dividend than
any other equally ranking series;
|
|
|
|
a series of preferred stock ranking equally with the
Series A Preferred Stock cannot be issued without the
approval of holders of the Depositary Shares if the certificate
of designation for such parity preferred stock will provide that
the dividends on the parity preferred stock will
cumulate; and
|
|
|
|
no dividends shall be paid or declared on any particular series
of preferred stock unless dividends are paid or declared pro
rata on all shares of outstanding preferred stock which rank
equally as to dividends with such particular series
(collectively the
Dividend Blocker Amendment
);
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the right of holders of Series A Preferred
Stock to elect two directors if dividends have not been paid for
six quarterly dividend periods, whether or not consecutive (the
Director Amendment
and, together with the Dividend
Blocker Amendment, the
Preferred Stock Amendments
and,
together with the Common Stock Amendments, the
Amendments
); and
|
|
|
|
to adjourn, postpone or continue the special meeting if
necessary or appropriate to permit further solicitation of
proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
special meeting to approve the Amendments (the
Adjournment
Proposal
and, together with the Amendments, the
Stockholder Proposals
).
|
The effectiveness of any Common Stock Amendment or Preferred
Stock Amendment is not conditioned on the approval of any other
Common Stock Amendment or Preferred Stock Amendment.
A special meeting of the holders of our common stock will be
held on Monday, February 22, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., at
Dominican University Priory Campus, 7200 West Division, River
Forest, Illinois, at which time the holders of the common stock
will be asked to consider the Amendments. The record date for
the special meeting will be on or after the settlement date for
the Exchange Offer, which is currently expected to be
January 15, 2010 (the
Record Date
).
Your proxy will be voted in accordance with the instructions
given by means of the enclosed proxy.
Even if holders of our common stock approve the Amendments, the
board of directors reserves the right to elect to abandon any or
all of the Amendments if it determines, in its sole discretion,
that such Amendment is no longer in the best interests of
Midwest and its stockholders.
Granting your proxy to approve the Amendments is important for
the success of the capital plan that we announced on
July 28, 2009 (the
Capital Plan
) which is designed
to increase our common equity capital so that we may meet the
current and expected requirements of our regulators, withstand
continued and potentially more adverse economic conditions and
improve our tangible common equity
(TCE)
and our
Tier I Common (see Background of the
Transactions below). We are pleased to report that we have
already made progress in implementing these proposed
transactions (the
Transactions
):
|
|
|
|
|
We sold 84,875 shares of our Fixed Rate Cumulative
Preferred, Series T to the USG for $84.784 million in
December of 2008 (the
Series T Preferred Stock
) and
issued a warrant which allows the USG to purchase
4.282 million shares of our common stock for $2.97 per
share (the
Warrant
) under the USGs Capital Purchase
Program. We are engaged in discussions with the USG to exchange
the shares of Series T Preferred Stock for a new series of
our preferred stock (the
Preferred Stock Issuance
).
Although the USG has expressed its willingness to consent to
such a transaction, the specific terms of any potential
transaction with the USG are subject to further negotiations
between the Company and the USG, and the specific terms are
expected to include conditions the satisfaction of which will be
solely determined by the USG. We anticipate that the new series
of preferred stock will rank senior as to dividend rights,
including cumulative dividend rights, and rights on liquidation,
winding-up
and dissolution to the Series A Preferred Stock (the
Senior Preferred Stock
). Immediately thereafter, we
anticipate that the Senior Preferred Stock will be converted
into shares of our common stock (the
Conversion
). At the
present time, we do not know the number of shares of our common
stock that will be issued to the USG upon the Conversion nor can
we provide any assurance that the Series T Preferred Stock
will be exchanged for the Senior Preferred Stock or that the
Conversion will occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are negotiating with our primary lender to restructure
$55.0 million of senior debt and $15.0 million of
subordinated debt.
|
|
|
|
We are seeking to engage in one or more private
and/or
public offerings of common
and/or
convertible preferred stock.
|
|
|
|
We have commenced an exchange offer (the
Exchange Offer
)
pursuant to which we are offering to exchange newly issued
shares of our common stock for any and all issued and
outstanding Depositary Shares.
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
We have mailed a separate Notice of Solicitation of Voting
Instructions and Special Meeting and accompanying proxy
statement (the
Preferred Proxy Statement
) to holders of
our Depositary Shares, seeking their voting instructions to vote
to approve the Preferred Stock Amendments and the Preferred
Stock Issuance.
|
We believe that the Amendments will benefit the holders of our
common stock. If the Authorized Share Increase and the Common
Stock Issuance are not approved, we will not be able to convert
the Senior Preferred Stock into shares of common stock. If the
Conversion does not occur, we will not be able to strengthen our
TCE and Tier 1 Common as planned. In addition, if the
Conversion does not occur, we anticipate that adjustments will
be made to decrease the Conversion price and increase the
dividend rate of the Senior Preferred Stock.
We believe the Reverse Stock Split will allow us to restore our
common stock price to a normalized trading level, which will
enhance liquidity. The Reverse Stock Split will also allow us to
reduce certain of our transaction costs (e.g., proxy
solicitation fees). The Preferred Stock Change will provide the
board of directors with important flexibility to adopt
amendments to our Certificate (including certificates of
designation for series of preferred stock) that affect only the
terms of preferred stock, which is consistent with the
boards current flexibility to create new series of
preferred stock.
The Dividend Blocker Amendment, if it becomes effective, will
allow us to pay dividends on our common stock even if full
dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock have not been
paid or declared and set apart for payment, which we believe
will enhance the price and liquidity of our common stock. It
will also allow us to issue preferred stock ranking equally with
the Series A Preferred Stock that will be authorized to pay
cumulative dividends without the approval of the holders of the
Depositary Shares. The Director Amendment, if it becomes
effective, will eliminate the possibility that non-exchanging
holders of Depositary Shares could exercise a level of influence
and control over the governance and the management of our
company that is disproportionate to their remaining economic
interest. The Preferred Stock Issuance, if it becomes effective,
will help us increase our TCE and our Tier 1 Common because
upon the Conversion, the shares of Senior Preferred Stock will
be converted into shares of our common stock.
The board of directors has unanimously approved and declared
advisable each of the Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal
and unanimously recommends that you grant a proxy to the
individuals named on the enclosed proxy card to approve each of
the Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal.
If you are a record holder of common stock that was not issued
in the Exchange Offer and is outstanding and entitled to vote on
the Record Date, you are urged to complete, date and sign the
enclosed proxy card and promptly return it in the enclosed
postage-prepaid envelope or vote by telephone or Internet by
following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card. If you
hold your common stock through a bank, broker, custodian or
other nominee, please contact your bank, broker, custodian or
other nominee to instruct it to grant a proxy on your behalf
with respect to each of the Amendments and the Adjournment
Proposal.
If you held Depositary Shares, we previously sent you a copy of
this proxy statement in connection with the Exchange Offer.
ANY PREVIOUSLY GRANTED PROXY INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN WITH
RESPECT TO YOUR DEPOSITARY SHARES WILL NOT HAVE ANY EFFECT
WITH RESPECT TO SHARES OF COMMON STOCK THAT WERE NOT ISSUED
IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER. IN ORDER TO TAKE ACTION ON THE AMENDMENTS
AND THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL WITH RESPECT TO SHARES OF
COMMON STOCK THAT WERE NOT ISSUED IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER, YOU
MUST COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN
IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE OR VOTE BY
TELEPHONE OR INTERNET BY FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE
ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.
The proxy statement enclosed with this letter provides you with
important information about the matters for which we are seeking
your proxy. We encourage you to read the entire proxy statement
carefully. You may also obtain additional information about us
from documents we have filed with the SEC and on our website at
www.midwestbanc.com
. Click on About Us, and
then Investor Relations-SEC Filings.
A copy of
the proxy
7
statement is available at www.envisionreports.com/MBHI for
registered holders and www.edocumentview.com/MBHI for beneficial
owners.
Regardless of the number of shares you own, your proxy is
important.
Please complete, date and sign the
enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed
envelope so that we receive your response on or before
February 22, 2010. You may also grant your proxy over the
Internet or by telephone on or before the Proxy Deadline. Please
review the instructions on the enclosed proxy card regarding
each of these options.
Thank you for your continued support of Midwest.
Sincerely,
Roberto R. Herencia
President
Percy L. Berger
Chairman
8
Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
501 West North Avenue
Melrose Park, IL 60160
Notice of Solicitation of Voting Instructions and Special
Meeting
To the holders of Depositary Shares representing shares of
Series A Noncumulative Redeemable Convertible Perpetual
Preferred Stock of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
This proxy statement is being delivered to the holders of the
depositary shares which represent a
1/100th interest
in a share of Series A Noncumulative Redeemable Convertible
Perpetual Preferred Stock (the
Depositary Shares
) of
Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
(Midwest)
, in connection with
the Exchange Offer (as defined in the attached proxy statement).
In order to participate in the Exchange Offer, you will be
required to grant your Proxy Instructions (as defined below) in
respect of the shares of common stock that may be issued to you
in the Exchange Offer in favor of the following proposed
amendments to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation (the
Certificate
) and the certificate of
designation for our Series A Preferred Stock (as defined
below) and the issuance of shares of our common stock to the
United States Department of the Treasury
(USG)
, all of
which have been unanimously approved and declared advisable by
the board of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock of
Midwest from 64 million to four billion (the
Authorized
Share Increase
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
to (i) effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at
any time prior to December 31, 2010 at one of four reverse
split ratios,
1-for-100,
1-for-150,
1-for-200,
or
1-for-250,
as determined by the board of directors in its sole discretion
and (ii) if and when the reverse stock split is effected,
reduce the number of authorized shares of our common stock by
the reverse split ratio determined by the board of directors
(the
Reverse Stock Split
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the voting rights of shares of common stock with
respect to any amendment to the Certificate (including any
certificate of designation related to any series of preferred
stock) that relates solely to the terms of one or more
outstanding series of preferred stock, if such series of
preferred stock is entitled to vote, either separately or
together as a class with the holders of one or more other such
series, on such amendment (the
Preferred Stock
Change
); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the issuance of shares of our common stock to the USG
upon the conversion of the Senior Preferred Stock (as defined
below) into shares of our common stock (the
Common Stock
Issuance
, and together with the Authorized Share Increase,
the Reverse Stock Split and the Preferred Stock Change, the
Common Stock Amendments
); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the requirement that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
full dividends on all outstanding shares of the Series A
Noncumulative Redeemable Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock
(the
Series A Preferred Stock
) must have been
declared and paid or declared and set aside for the then current
dividend period before we may pay any dividend on, make any
distributions relating to, or redeem, purchase, acquire or make
a liquidation payment relating to our common stock or any other
securities junior to the Series A Preferred Stock;
|
|
|
|
if full dividends are not declared and paid in full on the
Series A Preferred Stock, dividends with respect to all
series of stock ranking equally with the Series A Preferred
Stock will be declared on a proportional basis, such that no
series is paid a greater percentage of its stated dividend than
any other equally ranking series;
|
|
|
|
a series of preferred stock ranking equally with the
Series A Preferred Stock cannot be issued without the
approval of holders of the Depositary Shares if the certificate
of designation for such parity preferred stock will provide that
the dividends on the parity preferred stock will
cumulate; and
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
no dividends shall be paid or declared on any particular series
of preferred stock unless dividends are paid or declared pro
rata on all shares of outstanding preferred stock which rank
equally as to dividends with such particular series
(collectively the
Dividend Blocker Amendment
);
|
to eliminate the right of holders of Series A Preferred
Stock to elect two directors if dividends have not been paid for
six quarterly dividend periods, whether or not consecutive (the
Director Amendment
and, together with the Dividend
Blocker Amendment, the
Preferred Stock Amendments
and,
together with the Common Stock Amendments, the
Amendments
); and
|
|
|
|
|
to adjourn, postpone or continue the special meeting if
necessary or appropriate to permit further solicitation of
proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
special meeting to approve the Amendments (the
Adjournment
Proposal
and, together with the Amendments, the
Stockholder Proposals
).
|
The effectiveness of any Common Stock Amendment or Preferred
Stock Amendment is not conditioned on the approval of any other
Common Stock Amendment or Preferred Stock Amendment.
We are soliciting your Proxy Instructions in respect of the
shares of common stock that you will receive if we accept any of
your Depositary Shares representing our Series A Preferred
Stock for exchange in the Exchange Offer.
A special meeting of the holders of our common stock will be
held on Monday, February 22, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., at
Dominican University Priory Campus, 7200 West Division, River
Forest, Illinois, at which time the holders of our common stock
will be asked to consider the Amendments. The record date for
the special meeting will be on or after the settlement date for
the Exchange Offer, which is currently expected to be
January 15, 2010 (the
Record Date
).
Even if holders of our common stock approve the Amendments, the
board of directors reserves the right to elect to abandon any or
all of the Amendments if it determines, in its sole discretion,
that such Amendment is no longer in the best interests of
Midwest and its stockholders.
As described in our preliminary prospectus included in our
registration statement on
Form S-4
(Registration
No. 333-160985),
initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC)
on August 3, 2009 (the
Prospectus
), of
which the enclosed proxy statement is a part, we will not accept
your Depositary Shares for exchange unless you follow the
procedures contained in the letter of transmittal related to the
applicable Exchange Offer (the
Letter of Transmittal
) to
instruct the Voting Trustee (as defined below) of the Voting
Trust (as defined below) to grant an irrevocable proxy to the
individuals designated by Midwest in the Voting
Trust Agreement (as defined below) to vote to approve each
of the Stockholder Proposals in respect of the common stock to
be issued to you in the Exchange Offer (the
Proxy
Instructions
). If we accept your Depositary Shares for
exchange in the Exchange Offer, your Proxy Instructions will
become irrevocable, and you will not be able to change your
vote.
By tendering your Depositary Shares in the Exchange Offer in
accordance with the Letter of Transmittal, you irrevocably
(i) approve all of the Stockholder Proposals,
(ii) grant your Proxy Instructions to Illinois Stock
Transfer Company, as trustee (the
Voting Trustee
) of the
voting trust (the
Voting Trust
) established pursuant to
the voting trust agreement, dated as of December 3, 2009
(the
Voting Trust Agreement
), (iii) subject to
and effective upon acceptance for exchange of your tendered
Depositary Shares, agree to the terms of the Voting
Trust Agreement and (iv) acknowledge that by tendering
your Depositary Shares, you will become a party to the Voting
Trust Agreement. The shares of common stock issued pursuant
to the Exchange Offer will be delivered to the Voting Trust on
the settlement date of the Exchange Offer to be held in trust.
The Voting Trustee, pursuant to the terms of the Voting
Trust Agreement, will execute and deliver an irrevocable
proxy in respect of such shares of common stock to the
individuals named in the Voting Trust Agreement to vote in
favor of the Stockholder Proposals. The shares of common stock
exchanged for your tendered Depositary Shares will thereafter
within one business day be released from the Voting Trust and
will be distributed to the Depositary Trust Company for
distribution to you.
10
We are soliciting Proxy Instructions pursuant to the Letter of
Transmittal from holders of Depositary Shares. Only holders of
record of Depositary Shares, who validly tendered their
securities pursuant to the Exchange Offer, are entitled to grant
Proxy Instructions pursuant to the Letter of Transmittal with
respect to the Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal.
Accordingly, if you are a holder of Depositary Shares, in order
to give your Proxy Instruction in respect of the shares of
common stock to be issued to you pursuant to the Exchange Offer,
you must tender your Depositary Shares and give your Proxy
Instructions by complying with the requirements and following
the procedures set forth in the Letter of Transmittal. In order
to participate in the Exchange Offer, you must grant your Proxy
Instructions pursuant to the Letter of Transmittal.
If you hold your Depositary Shares through a bank, broker,
custodian or other nominee and wish to participate in the
Exchange Offer, please contact your bank, broker, custodian or
other nominee to instruct it to tender your Depositary Shares in
accordance with the instructions in the Prospectus and the
Letter of Transmittal and grant your Proxy Instructions pursuant
to the Letter of Transmittal. Due to the time required for your
bank, broker, custodian or other nominee to complete the
required actions on your part, we urge you to contact your bank,
broker, custodian or other nominee at least five business days
prior to the expiration date of the Exchange Offer.
The board of directors has unanimously approved and declared
advisable each of the Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal
and unanimously recommends that you follow the procedures
contained in the Letter of Transmittal to give your Proxy
Instructions to approve each of the Amendments and the
Adjournment Proposal.
By order of the Board of Directors
JoAnn
Sannasardo Lilek
Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
December 3, 2009
11
Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
501 West North Avenue
Melrose Park, IL 60160
Notice of Solicitation of Proxies and a Special Meeting
Dear Common Stockholder:
This proxy statement is being delivered to you in connection
with the solicitation on behalf of the board of directors of
proxies from the holders of our common stock. The board of
directors is requesting that the holders of our common stock on
the Record Date described below grant a proxy authorizing the
individuals named on the enclosed proxy card to vote to approve
the following amendments to our amended and restated certificate
of incorporation (the
Certificate
) and the certificate of
designation for our Series A Preferred Stock (as defined
below) and the issuance of shares of our common stock to the
United States Department of the Treasury
(USG)
, all of
which have been unanimously approved and declared advisable by
the board of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock of
Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
(Midwest)
, from
64 million to four billion (the
Authorized Share
Increase
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
to (i) effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at
any time prior to December 31, 2010 at one of four reverse
split ratios,
1-for-100,
1-for-150,
1-for-200,
or
1-for-250,
as determined by the board of directors in its sole discretion
and (ii) if and when the reverse stock split is effected,
reduce the number of authorized shares of our common stock by
the reverse split ratio determined by the board of directors
(the
Reverse Stock Split
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the voting rights of shares of common stock with
respect to any amendment to the Certificate (including any
certificate of designation related to any series of preferred
stock) that relates solely to the terms of one or more
outstanding series of preferred stock, if such series of
preferred stock is entitled to vote, either separately or
together as a class with the holders of one or more other such
series, on such amendment (the
Preferred Stock
Change
); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the issuance of shares of our common stock to the USG
upon the conversion of the Senior Preferred Stock (as defined
below) into shares of our common stock (the
Common Stock
Issuance
, and together with the Authorized Share Increase,
the Reverse Stock Split, and the Preferred Stock Change, the
Common Stock Amendments
); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the requirement that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
full dividends on all outstanding shares of the Series A
Noncumulative Redeemable Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock
(the
Series A Preferred Stock
) must have been
declared and paid or declared and set aside for the then current
dividend period before we may pay any dividend on, make any
distributions relating to, or redeem, purchase, acquire or make
a liquidation payment relating to our common stock or any other
securities junior to the Series A Preferred Stock;
|
|
|
|
if full dividends are not declared and paid in full on the
Series A Preferred Stock, dividends with respect to all
series of stock ranking equally with the Series A Preferred
Stock will be declared on a proportional basis, such that no
series is paid a greater percentage of its stated dividend than
any other equally ranking series; and
|
|
|
|
a series of preferred stock ranking equally with the
Series A Preferred Stock cannot be issued without the
approval of holders of the Depositary Shares if the certificate
of designation for such parity preferred stock will provide that
the dividends on the parity preferred stock will cumulate
(collectively the
Dividend Blocker Amendment
); and
|
|
|
|
no dividends shall be paid or declared on any particular series
of preferred stock unless dividends are paid or declared pro
rata on all shares of outstanding preferred stock which rank
equally as to dividends with such particular series
(collectively the
Dividend Blocker Amendment
);
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the right of holders of Series A Preferred
Stock to elect two directors if dividends have not been paid for
six quarterly dividend periods, whether or not consecutive (the
Director Amendment
and, together with the Dividend
Blocker Amendment, the
Preferred Stock Amendments
and,
together with the Common Stock Amendments, the
Amendments
); and
|
|
|
|
to adjourn, postpone or continue the special meeting if
necessary or appropriate to permit further solicitation of
proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
special meeting to approve the Amendments (the
Adjournment
Proposal
and, together with the Amendments, the
Stockholder Proposals
).
|
The effectiveness of any Common Stock Amendment or Preferred
Stock Amendment is not conditioned on the approval of any other
Common Stock Amendment or Preferred Stock Amendment.
A special meeting of the holders of our common stock will be
held on Monday, February 22, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., at
Dominican University Priory Campus, 7200 West Division, River
Forest, Illinois, at which time the holders of our common stock
will be asked to consider the Amendments. The record date for
the special meeting will be on or after the settlement date for
the Exchange Offer, which is currently expected to be
January 15, 2010 (the
Record Date
).
Even if holders of our common stock approve the Amendments, the
board of directors reserves the right to elect to abandon any or
all of the Amendments if it determines, in its sole discretion,
that such Amendment is no longer in the best interests of
Midwest and its stockholders.
Your proxy will be voted at the special meeting in accordance
with the instructions given by means of the enclosed proxy card.
We are soliciting proxies from the holders of record of our
common stock that was not issued in the Exchange Offer (as
defined in the attached proxy statement) to authorize the
individuals designated by Midwest in the enclosed proxy card to
vote to approve each of the Stockholder Proposals described
above. Only holders of record of our common stock outstanding as
of the close of business on the record date (the
Record
Date
), which will be the settlement date of the Exchange
Offer (as defined in the attached proxy statement), are entitled
to grant a proxy with respect to the Stockholder Proposals.
If you are a record holder of common stock that was not issued
in the Exchange Offer and that is outstanding and entitled to
vote on the Record Date, you are urged to complete, date and
sign the enclosed proxy card and promptly return it in the
enclosed postage-prepaid envelope or vote by telephone or
Internet by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy
card. To be counted, your properly completed written proxy card
must be received prior to February 22, 2010. If you hold
your common stock through a bank, broker, custodian or other
nominee, please contact your bank, broker, custodian or other
nominee to instruct it to grant a proxy on your behalf with
respect to each of the Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal.
If you held Depositary Shares, we previously sent you a copy of
this proxy statement in connection with the Exchange Offer.
ANY PREVIOUSLY GRANTED PROXY INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN WITH
RESPECT TO YOUR DEPOSITARY SHARES WILL NOT HAVE ANY EFFECT
WITH RESPECT TO SHARES OF COMMON STOCK THAT WERE NOT ISSUED
IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER. IN ORDER TO TAKE ACTION ON THE AMENDMENTS
AND THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL WITH RESPECT TO SHARES OF
COMMON STOCK THAT WERE NOT ISSUED IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER, YOU
MUST COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN
IT PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE OR VOTE BY
TELEPHONE OR INTERNET BY FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE
ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.
Regardless of the number of shares you own, your proxy is
important.
If you hold your shares through a
bank, broker, custodian or other nominee, please contact your
bank, broker, custodian or other nominee to instruct it to
submit a proxy on your behalf. Due to the time required for your
nominee to complete the required actions on your part, we urge
you to contact your nominee at least five business days prior to
February 22, 2010.
13
The board of directors has unanimously approved and declared
advisable the Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal and
unanimously recommends that you grant a proxy to the individuals
named on the enclosed proxy card vote to approve each of the
Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal.
|
|
|
How You Can Vote:
|
|
Registered Holders
:
If you hold your
shares of common stock in your own name as of the Record Date
that were not issued or in the Exchange Offer, you may vote your
proxy by marking, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and
returning it as soon as possible using the enclosed envelope or
you may vote by Internet or telephone.
|
|
|
|
By Internet:
go to
www.investorvote.com/MBHI
and follow the steps on the
secure website.
|
|
|
|
By Phone:
call toll free
1-800-652-VOTE
and follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your validation details are located on the proxy card.
Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be
received by 1:00 a.m., Central Time, on February 22,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Holders
: If your shares are held in the
name of a broker, bank or other holder of record, you must
follow the instructions you receive from the holder of record to
vote your shares.
|
By order of the Board of Directors
A copy of
the proxy statement is available at www.envisionreports.com/MBHI
for registered holders and www.edocumentview.com/MBHI for
beneficial owners.
Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
December 3, 2009
14
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
|
|
|
C-1
|
|
|
|
|
D-1
|
|
|
|
|
E-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
15
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains statements that are considered
forward looking statements within the meaning of
United States securities laws. Forward-looking statements,
including statements about industry trends, managements
future expectations and other matters that do not relate
strictly to historical facts, are based on assumptions by
management, and are often identified by such forward-looking
terminology as expect, look,
believe, anticipate,
estimate, seek, may,
will, trend, target, and
goal or similar statements or variations of such
terms.
Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and
uncertainties, which change over time, and are based on
managements expectations and assumptions at the time the
statements are made. Forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future results. Managements expectations and
assumptions, and the continued validity of the forward-looking
statements, are subject to change due to a broad range of
factors affecting the national and global economies, the equity,
debt, currency and other financial markets, as well as factors
specific to Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
(Midwest
or the
Company)
and its subsidiaries, including Midwest Bank and
Trust Company (referred to herein as
Midwest Bank
or
the
Bank
). These risks, uncertainties and other factors
include, without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
risks and uncertainties related to the Exchange Offer, including
|
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully execute the Exchange Offer,
including securing the exchange of a significant number of
Depositary Shares;
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully implement and achieve the other
goals of our multi-component capital plan (our Capital
Plan) that is designed to increase our common equity
capital, the success of which is dependent on a successful
Exchange Offer; and
|
|
|
|
whether we will need to materially modify our Capital Plan in
the future;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the effect of the recently enacted Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008, the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, the implementation by the United
States Department of the Treasury
(USG)
and federal
banking regulators of a number of programs to address capital
and liquidity issues in the banking system and additional
programs that will apply to us in the future, all of which may
have significant effects on us and the financial services
industry;
|
|
|
|
the effect on our profitability if interest rates fluctuate as
well as the effect of our customers changing use of our
deposit products;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that our wholesale funding sources may prove
insufficient to replace deposits at maturity and support
potential growth;
|
|
|
|
inaccessibility of funding sources on the same terms on which we
have historically relied if we are unable to maintain our
current capital ratings;
|
|
|
|
the risk that our allowance for loan losses may prove
insufficient to absorb probable losses in our loan portfolio;
|
|
|
|
possible volatility in loan charge-offs and recoveries between
periods;
|
|
|
|
the decline in commercial and residential real estate sales
volume and the likely potential for continuing illiquidity in
the real estate market, including within the Chicago
metropolitan area;
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with the high concentration of commercial
real estate loans in our portfolio;
|
|
|
|
the uncertainties in estimating the fair value of developed real
estate and undeveloped land in light of declining demand for
such assets and continuing illiquidity in the real estate market;
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with management changes and employee
turnover;
|
|
|
|
the uncertainties with respect to the future utilization of our
deferred tax assets;
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
negative developments and disruptions in the credit and lending
markets, including the impact of the ongoing credit crisis on
our business and on the businesses of our customers as well as
other banks and lending institutions with which we have
commercial relationships;
|
|
|
|
a continuation of the recent unprecedented volatility in the
capital markets;
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with implementing our business strategy,
including our ability to preserve and access sufficient capital
to execute on our strategy;
|
|
|
|
rising unemployment and its impact on our customers
savings rates and their ability to service debt obligations;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic and capital market conditions,
interest rates, our debt credit ratings, deposit flows, loan
demand, including loan syndication opportunities and competition;
|
|
|
|
changes in legislation or regulatory and accounting
requirements, principles, policies or guidelines affecting our
business, including the results of regulatory examinations; and
|
|
|
|
other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and
technological factors impacting our operations.
|
Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is
expressed in our forward-looking statements and from our
historical financial results due to the factors discussed
elsewhere in this proxy statement or disclosed in our other SEC
filings. Forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as
representing our expectations or beliefs as of any date
subsequent to the time this proxy statement is filed with the
SEC. The factors discussed herein are not intended to be a
complete summary of all risks and uncertainties that may affect
our businesses. Though we strive to monitor and mitigate risk,
we cannot anticipate all potential economic, operational and
financial developments that may adversely impact our operations
and our financial results.
Forward-looking statements should not be viewed as predictions,
and should not be the basis upon which you determine whether to
participate in the Exchange Offer or how to vote on the
Stockholder Proposals. Any investor in Midwest should consider
all risks and uncertainties disclosed in our SEC filings
described below under the heading Where You Can Find More
Information, all of which are accessible on the SECs
website at
http://www.sec.gov.
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY SOLICITATION MATERIALS
AND THE PROXY SOLICITATION
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Who is soliciting my Proxy Instructions or proxy?
|
|
|
|
A:
|
|
The board of directors of Midwest is providing these proxy
solicitation materials to you in connection with its
solicitation of Proxy Instructions (as defined below) and
proxies to vote to approve certain amendments to our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation (the
Certificate
)
and the certificate of designation for our Series A
Preferred Stock (as defined below), to authorize the issuance of
shares of our common stock to the USG (as defined below) upon
the conversion of the Senior Preferred Stock (as defined below)
into shares of our common stock and to adjourn the special
meeting, if necessary (collectively, the Stockholder Proposals).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The board is providing this proxy statement and the accompanying
proxy card to holders of our common stock that was not issued in
the Exchange Offer shortly after the Record Date (as defined
below).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The board of directors is providing this proxy statement, which
forms a part of the preliminary prospectus included in our
registration statement on
Form S-4
(Registration
No. 333-160985),
initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(
SEC
) on August 3, 2009 (the
Prospectus
) and
the letter of transmittal related to the Exchange Offer (as
defined below) (the
Letter of Transmittal
) to holders of
Depositary Shares (each as defined below) eligible to tender
their Depositary Shares (as defined below) in exchange for
common stock in the Exchange Offer beginning on or about
December 3, 2009.
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
This proxy statement, the Prospectus, the Letter of
Transmittal and the Notice of Solicitation of Voting
Instructions and a Special Meeting will also be available at
www.envisionreports.com/MBHI for registered holders and
www.edocumentview.com/MBHI for beneficial owners.
This proxy
statement contains important information for you to consider
when deciding how to vote on these matters. Please read it
carefully.
|
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Who is entitled to give Proxy Instructions or a proxy?
|
|
|
|
A:
|
|
The record date (the
Record Date
) for determining holders
of common stock entitled to give their proxy with respect to
this solicitation will be on or after the settlement date of the
Exchange Offer which is currently expected to be
January 15, 2010. Upon expiration of the Exchange Offer,
this date will become fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holders of common stock that was not issued in the Exchange
Offer on the Record Date will be entitled to give a proxy using
the enclosed proxy card or to vote online or by phone with
respect to the Stockholder Proposals (as defined below). You may
give your proxy on behalf of all such shares owned by you as of
the Record Date that are held directly in your name as the
stockholder of record on the Record Date. If you hold such
shares of common stock on the Record Date through a bank,
broker, custodian or other nominee, you may instruct your bank,
broker, custodian or other nominee to give a proxy on your
behalf.
|
|
|
|
If you hold any depositary shares
(Depositary Shares)
representing our Series A Noncumulative Redeemable
Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock (the
Series A Preferred
Stock
) that are the subject of the Exchange Offer, you will
be entitled to give (and must give) Proxy Instructions to
approve the Stockholder Proposals if you tender your Depositary
Shares, and they are accepted for exchange in the Exchange
Offer. Your Depositary Shares will be accepted only if you
follow the procedures contained in the Letter of Transmittal to
grant your Proxy Instructions to approve the Amendments and the
Adjournment Proposal. If you hold your Depositary Shares through
a bank, broker, custodian or other nominee, you must instruct
your bank, broker or other nominee to grant your Proxy
Instructions on your behalf.
|
|
|
|
You will be able to give or withhold a proxy, or abstain, on
each proposal for every share of common stock that you hold on
the Record Date, unless you are a holder of Depositary Shares,
who will not be able to take action on the matters described in
this proxy statement except to give your Proxy Instructions to
approve the Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal pursuant to
the Letter of Transmittal.
|
|
Q:
|
|
What am I being asked to give my Proxy Instructions or proxy
to?
|
|
A:
|
|
You are being asked to give your Proxy Instructions or proxy
with respect to the following proposed amendments to our
Certificate and the certificate of designation for our
Series A Preferred Stock and the Common Stock Issuance (as
defined below), in each case, that have been unanimously
approved and declared advisable by the board of directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock of
Midwest from 64 million to four billion shares (the
Authorized Share Increase
);
|
|
|
|
to (i) effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at
any time prior to September 30, 2010 at one of four reverse
split ratios,
1-for-100,
1-for-150,
1-for-200,
or
1-for-250,
as determined by the board of directors in its sole discretion
and (ii) if and when the reverse stock split is effected,
reduce the number of authorized shares of our common stock by
the reverse split ratio determined by the board of directors
(the
Reverse Stock Split
);
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the voting rights of shares of common stock with
respect to any amendment to the Certificate (including any
certificate of designation related to any series of preferred
stock) that relates solely to the terms of one or more
outstanding series of preferred stock, if such series of
preferred stock is entitled to vote, either separately or
together as a class with the holders of one or more other such
series, on such amendment (the
Preferred Stock
Change
); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the issuance of shares of our common stock to the USG
upon the conversion of the Senior Preferred Stock (as defined
below) into shares of our common stock (the
Common Stock
Issuance
, and
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
together with the Authorized Share Increase, the Reverse Stock
Split and the Preferred Stock Change, the
Common Stock
Amendments
); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the requirement that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
full dividends on all outstanding shares of the Series A
Preferred Stock must have been declared and paid or declared and
set aside for the then current dividend period before we may pay
any dividend on, make any distributions relating to, or redeem,
purchase, acquire or make a liquidation payment relating to our
common stock or any other securities junior to the Series A
Preferred Stock;
|
|
|
|
if full dividends are not declared and paid in full on the
Series A Preferred Stock, dividends with respect to all
series of stock ranking equally with the Series A Preferred
Stock will be declared on a proportional basis, such that no
series is paid a greater percentage of its stated dividend than
any other equally ranking series;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a series of preferred stock ranking equally with the
Series A Preferred Stock cannot be issued without the
approval of holders of the Depositary Shares if the certificate
of designation for such parity preferred stock will provide that
the dividends on the parity preferred stock will
cumulate; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
no dividends shall be paid or declared on any particular series
of preferred stock unless dividends are paid or declared pro
rata on all shares of outstanding preferred stock which rank
equally as to dividends with such particular series
(collectively the
Dividend Blocker Amendment
);
|
|
|
|
|
|
to eliminate the right of holders of Series A Preferred
Stock to elect two directors if dividends have not been paid for
six quarterly dividend periods, whether or not consecutive (the
Director Amendment
and, together with the Dividend
Blocker Amendment, the
Preferred Stock Amendments
, and
together with the Common Stock Amendments, the
Amendments
); and
|
|
|
|
to adjourn, postpone or continue the special meeting if
necessary or appropriate to permit further solicitation of
proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
special meeting to approve the Amendments (the
Adjournment
Proposal
and, together with the Amendments, the
Stockholder Proposals
).
|
Even if holders of our common stock approve the Amendments, the
board of directors reserves the right to elect to abandon any or
all of the Amendments if it determines, in its sole discretion,
that such Amendment is no longer in the best interests of
Midwest and its stockholders.
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What is the recommendation of the board of directors?
|
|
A:
|
|
The board unanimously recommends that you give your Proxy
Instructions pursuant to the Letter of Transmittal or your
proxy, as the case may be, to vote in favor of each of the
Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal.
|
|
Q:
|
|
Will there be a special meeting of the holders of the common
stock?
|
|
|
|
|
|
A:
Yes
. A special meeting of the holders of
our common stock will be held on Monday, February 22, 2010,
at 9:00 a.m., at Dominican University Priory Campus,
7200 West Division, River Forest, Illinois, at which time
the holders of our common stock will be asked to consider and
vote on the Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal.
|
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What portion of shares must give their approval in order to
adopt the Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal?
|
|
A:
|
|
The affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of
common stock outstanding as of the Record Date (which includes
shares of common stock issued in respect of Depositary Shares in
the Exchange Offer) is required to approve each of the
Amendments, except for the Common Stock Issuance which must be
approved by the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the
shares of common stock represented and entitled to vote at the
special meeting. The Adjournment Proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the common
stock represented and entitled to vote at the special meeting.
|
19
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
What options do I have with respect to the Stockholder
Proposals?
|
|
A:
|
|
If you are a holder of Depositary Shares and you wish to tender
your shares in the Exchange Offer, then you
must
follow
the procedures contained in the Letter of Transmittal to give
your Proxy Instructions to approve the Stockholder Proposals
(which is equivalent to a vote for each Amendment and the
Adjournment Proposal).
|
|
|
|
If you hold shares of common stock that were not issued in the
Exchange Offer, with respect to such shares of common stock, you
may give a proxy authorizing the individuals designated by
Midwest on the enclosed proxy card to vote FOR, AGAINST (which
is equivalent to a vote against (or vote by phone on the
Internet) each Amendment, except the Common Stock Issuance), or
to ABSTAIN on each Stockholder Proposal. If you give a proxy to
abstain, the abstention will have the same effect as a vote
against each Stockholder Proposal.
|
|
Q:
|
|
How can I submit my Proxy Instructions if I am a holder of
Depositary Shares that is participating in the Exchange
Offer?
|
|
A:
|
|
If you are a holder of record of Depositary Shares and you wish
to tender your shares in the Exchange Offer, then you need only
comply with the requirements for participating in the Exchange
Offer set forth in the Prospectus and the Letter of Transmittal
to tender your shares and to give your Proxy Instructions to
approve the Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal (which
instructions will become irrevocable following expiration of the
Exchange Offer).
|
|
|
|
|
|
By tendering your Depositary Shares in the Exchange Offer in
accordance with the Letter of Transmittal, you irrevocably
(i) agree and consent to all of the Stockholder Proposals,
(ii) instruct Illinois Stock Transfer Company, as trustee
(the
Voting Trustee
) of the voting trust (the
Voting
Trust
) established pursuant to the voting trust agreement,
dated as of December 3, 2009 (the
Voting
Trust Agreement
) to grant an irrevocable proxy to the
individuals designated by Midwest in the Voting
Trust Agreement to vote to approve each of the Amendments
and the Adjournment Proposal in respect of the common stock to
be issued to you in the Exchange Offer (the
Proxy
Instructions
), (iii) subject to and effective upon
acceptance for exchange of your tendered Depositary Shares,
agree to the terms of the Voting Trust Agreement and
(iv) acknowledge that by tendering your Depositary Shares,
you will become a party to the Voting Trust Agreement. The
shares of common stock issued pursuant to the Exchange Offer
will be delivered to the Voting Trust on the settlement date of
the Exchange Offer to be held in trust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Voting Trustee, pursuant to the terms of the Voting
Trust Agreement, will execute and deliver a proxy in
respect of such common stock to the individuals named in the
Voting Trust Agreement to vote in favor of the Amendments
and the Adjournment Proposal. The shares of common stock
exchanged for your tendered Depositary Shares will thereafter
within one business day be released from the Voting Trust and
will be distributed to Depository Trust Company for
distribution to you.
|
|
|
|
If you currently hold Depositary Shares that are held by a bank,
broker, custodian or other nominee, you are considered the
beneficial owner of the shares, and these proxy materials,
together with the Prospectus, are being forwarded to you by your
bank, broker, custodian or other nominee. When you contact your
bank, broker, custodian or other nominee promptly to instruct it
to tender your Depositary Shares, you must also instruct it to
give your Proxy Instructions and agree to be bound by the Voting
Trust Agreement, in each case, pursuant to the Letter of
Transmittal (which will result in your Proxy Instruction
becoming irrevocable following the expiration date of the
Exchange Offer).
|
|
Q:
|
|
How can I submit my proxy if I am a holder of common stock
that was not issued in the Exchange Offer?
|
|
|
|
Registered Holders
:
If you hold your
shares of common stock in your own name as of the Record Date
that were not issued in the Exchange Offer, you may vote your
proxy by marking, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card and
returning it as soon as possible using the enclosed envelope or
you may vote by Internet or telephone.
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
By Internet:
go to
www.investorvote.com/MBHI
and follow the steps on the
secure website.
|
|
|
|
By Phone:
call toll free
1-800-652-VOTE
and follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.
|
|
|
|
Your validation details are located on the proxy card.
|
|
|
|
If you hold shares of common stock as of the Record Date that
were not issued in the Exchange Offer and the shares are held by
a bank, broker, custodian or other nominee, you are considered
the beneficial owner of the shares, and these proxy materials,
together with a voting instruction form, are being forwarded to
you by your bank, broker, custodian or other nominee and you
must submit your proxy via your bank, broker or other nominee.
Depending upon your bank, broker, custodian or other nominee,
you may be able to vote either by toll-free telephone or by
Internet. Please refer to the enclosed voting instruction form
sent by your nominee for instructions on how to vote by
Internet. You may also submit your proxy by signing, dating and
returning any voting instruction form or other method of voting
made available by your bank, broker, custodian or other nominee.
|
|
Q:
|
|
What happens if I am the holder of record and do not submit
my Proxy Instructions or proxy?
|
|
A:
|
|
If you are a holder of Depositary Shares and you wish to tender
your shares in the Exchange Offer, but do not follow the
procedures contained in the Letter of Transmittal to agree to be
bound by the Voting Trust Agreement and to provide your
Proxy Instructions, we will not accept any Depositary Shares
that you have tendered for exchange and you will remain a holder
of Depositary Shares on the Record Date.
|
|
|
|
If you are a record holder of shares of common stock that were
not issued in the Exchange Offer and you do not return your
proxy card or vote online or by phone, that will have the same
effect as a vote against each Stockholder Proposal, except the
Common Stock Issuance and the Adjournment Proposal.
|
|
Q:
|
|
What happens if I am a beneficial owner of common stock and
do not tell my broker how to vote?
|
|
A:
|
|
If you are a beneficial holder of shares of common stock that
were not issued in the Exchange Offer and your broker does not
have discretion to vote on a matter, a broker
non-vote occurs if you do not provide the record holder of
your common stock, such as a bank, broker, custodian or other
nominee, with voting instructions on a matter.
|
|
|
|
For the Reverse Stock Split, a bank, broker, custodian or other
nominee who does not receive instructions from a beneficial
holder of common stock will be entitled to give a proxy for the
beneficial holders shares at the brokers discretion,
and may grant a proxy to vote to approve this proposal.
|
|
|
|
Banks, brokers, custodians and other nominees who do not receive
voting instructions from beneficial owners will not be entitled
to exercise discretion with respect to the Authorized Share
Increase, the Preferred Stock Change, the Common Stock Issuance,
the Preferred Stock Amendments or the Adjournment Proposal. A
failure to provide voting instructions on the Authorized Share
Increase, the Preferred Stock Change, any of the Preferred Stock
Amendments or the Adjournment Proposal will be equivalent to a
vote against them, as the case may be.
|
|
Q:
|
|
What if I am a record holder and I dont indicate a
decision with respect to some of the Stockholder Proposals?
|
|
A:
|
|
If you are a record holder and you return a signed proxy card
(or vote online or by phone) or the Letter of Transmittal
without indicating your decision on a Stockholder Proposal, you
will be deemed to have given your Proxy Instructions or your
proxy, as the case may be, in accordance with the boards
recommendation, authorizing the individuals designated by
Midwest to vote in favor of each of the Amendments and the
Adjournment Proposal.
|
|
Q:
|
|
What is the deadline for sending my Proxy Instructions or
proxy?
|
|
A:
|
|
If you are a holder of Depositary Shares and you wish to
participate in the Exchange Offer, you must have validly
tendered your Depositary Shares and given your Proxy
Instructions to approve the Amendments by following the
procedures contained in the Letter of Transmittal prior to the
expiration date of the Exchange
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
Offer, which is set forth in the Prospectus and the Letter of
Transmittal. This deadline may be extended by us in accordance
with applicable law. We are not providing for guaranteed
delivery procedures and therefore you must allow sufficient time
to comply with the other procedures set forth in the Prospectus
and the Letter of Transmittal prior to the expiration date of
the Exchange Offer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other holders of our common stock as of the Record Date must
return their proxy prior to the date of the special meeting
(February 22, 2010). If you hold your shares of common
stock through a bank, broker, custodian or other nominee, due to
the time required for your nominee to complete the required
actions on your part, we urge you to contact your bank, broker,
custodian or other nominee at least five business days prior to
February 22, 2010.
|
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Can I change or revoke my Proxy Instructions or proxy?
|
|
A:
|
|
If you have tendered Depositary Shares for exchange into common
stock in connection with the Exchange Offer and we accept your
Depositary Shares for exchange, then your Proxy Instructions
will become irrevocable, and you will be unable to change or
revoke your Proxy Instructions after we have accepted your
Depositary Shares for exchange. You may withdraw your Depositary
Shares at any time prior to the expiration date of the Exchange
Offer. Valid withdrawal of your tender will automatically revoke
your Proxy Instructions with respect to the common stock that
would have been issued in exchange for such Depositary Shares.
|
|
|
|
If you are a record holder on the Record Date of shares of
common stock that were not issued in the Exchange Offer, you may
change or revoke your proxy at any time before the vote on each
of the Amendments at the special meeting. If you wish to change
or revoke your previously given proxy, you may do so by:
|
|
|
|
sending in a new proxy card with a later date;
|
|
|
|
submitting a new proxy by telephone or
Internet; or
|
|
|
|
attending the meeting and voting in person.
|
|
|
|
If you are a beneficial owner of common stock and wish to change
the voting instructions given to your bank, broker, custodian or
other nominee, you will need to follow the procedures
established by them in order to revoke your voting instructions.
|
|
Q:
|
|
Is my proxy card confidential?
|
|
A:
|
|
All proxies, ballots and vote tabulations are kept confidential
for registered stockholders. If you hold your shares in street
name or through an employee benefit plan, your vote already
receives confidential treatment and you do not need to request
confidential treatment in order to maintain the confidentiality
of your vote.
|
|
|
|
The confidential voting policy will not apply in the event of a
proxy contest or other solicitation based on an opposition proxy
statement.
|
|
Q:
|
|
Is Midwest conducting any other proxy solicitations?
|
|
A:
|
|
Yes
. In connection with the Exchange Offer, we
mailed a separate Notice of Solicitation of Voting Instructions
and Special Meeting and a proxy statement to the holders of
Depositary Shares, asking them to give a voting instruction to
vote on the Preferred Stock Amendments and the issuance of the
Senior Preferred Stock. Giving your voting instruction with
respect to the matters described in the Preferred Proxy
Statement will not affect your Proxy Instructions with respect
to the Stockholder Proposals, and giving your Proxy Instructions
with respect to the Stockholder Proposals will not affect your
voting instructions with respect to the matters described in the
Preferred Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
|
Each of the Preferred Proxy Statement and this proxy statement
contain important information that you should read carefully.
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
If you were a holder of Depositary Shares on the record date for
the Preferred Proxy Statement and you are tendering your
Depositary Shares in connection with the Exchange Offer, in
addition to following the procedures contained in the Letter of
Transmittal to acknowledge and agree to be bound by the Voting
Trust Agreement and give your Proxy Instructions to approve
the Amendments, you must also give instructions to execute and
deliver a proxy to the individuals designated by Midwest to vote
to approve the proposals described in the Preferred Proxy
Statement in order to have your Depositary Shares accepted for
exchange. For more information, please see the Preferred Proxy
Statement.
|
|
Q:
|
|
How can I access Midwests proxy solicitation materials
and annual report electronically?
|
|
|
|
A:
|
|
Midwests 2008 annual report are available on
Midwests website at
www.midwestbanc.com
. Click on
About Us, and then Investor
Relations SEC Filings.
A copy of the proxy
statement is available at www.envisionreports.com/MBHI for
registered holders and www.edocumentview.com/MBHI for beneficial
owners.
|
|
|
|
Q:
|
|
Who can help answer my questions?
|
|
A:
|
|
If you have any questions about how to give or revoke your Proxy
Instructions or your proxy, as the case may be, or need
additional copies of any relevant documentation, you should
contact:
|
MORROW & CO., LLC
470 West Avenue
Stamford, CT 06902
Banks and Brokerage Firms, Please Call:
(203) 658-9400
Holders Call Toll Free:
(800) 483-1314
23
INFORMATION
ON VOTING SECURITIES
Each share of common stock not issued in the Exchange Offer that
is issued and outstanding as of the close of business on the
Record Date, which will be the settlement date for the Exchange
Offer, will be eligible to deliver a proxy with respect to the
Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal. Each share of common
stock issued in the Exchange Offer will be issued and
outstanding on the Record Date and will be entitled to vote on
the Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal but will be subject
to an irrevocable proxy delivered by the Voting Trustee in favor
of the Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal. Approval of each
of the Amendments requires the affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the shares of common stock outstanding as of the
close of business on the Record Date, except for the Common
Stock Issuance which must be approved by the affirmative vote of
holders of a majority of the shares of common stock represented
and entitled to vote at the special meeting. The Adjournment
Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the common stock represented and entitled to vote at
the special meeting. A vote AGAINST or an ABSTAIN will be
counted as a vote against the Authorized Share Increase, the
Reverse Stock Split, the Common Stock Issuance, the Preferred
Stock Change, the Preferred Stock Amendments or the Adjournment
Proposal, as the case may be.
The number of shares of common stock that are issued and
outstanding on the Record Date and entitled to approve the
Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal will depend on the
number of Depositary Shares that are accepted for exchange in
the Exchange Offer. Holders of Depositary Shares that tender
their Depositary Shares in the Exchange Offer and grant a Proxy
Instruction in favor of the Amendments and the Adjournment
Proposal will not know the results of the Exchange Offer or the
total number of shares of common stock that will be issued in
exchange for Depositary Shares at the time they make their
decision. The table below shows the approximate number of shares
of common stock that are expected to be issued and outstanding
on the Record Date and entitled to approve the Amendments and
the Adjournment Proposal, based on the number of shares of
common stock issued and outstanding prior to commencement of the
Exchange Offer and depending on the level of participation in
the Exchange Offer as described below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Numbers of Shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
To be Issued in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and
|
|
Respect of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Exchange Offer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the
|
|
In Respect of
|
|
To be Issued and
|
|
Required to
|
Level of Participation
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Depositary
|
|
Outstanding as of
|
|
Approve the
|
in the Exchange Offer(1)(7)
|
|
Offer
|
|
Shares
|
|
the Record Date
|
|
Proposals
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
25%(2)
|
|
|
28,116
|
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
31,470
|
|
|
|
15,735
|
|
50%(3)
|
|
|
28,116
|
|
|
|
6,708
|
|
|
|
34,824
|
|
|
|
17,412
|
|
66
2
/
3
%(4)
|
|
|
28,116
|
|
|
|
8,944
|
|
|
|
37,060
|
|
|
|
18,530
|
|
75%(5)
|
|
|
28,116
|
|
|
|
10,063
|
|
|
|
38,179
|
|
|
|
19,090
|
|
100%(6)
|
|
|
28,116
|
|
|
|
13,417
|
|
|
|
41,533
|
|
|
|
20,767
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Does not account for the treatment of fractional shares under
the terms of the Exchange Offer.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Assumes pro rata participation by 25% of the Depositary Shares.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Assumes pro rata participation by 50% of the Depositary Shares.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Assumes pro rata participation by
66
2
/
3
%
of the Depositary Shares.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Assumes pro rata participation by 75% of the Depositary Shares.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Assumes pro rata participation by 100% of Depositary Shares.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
In the case of the 25% participation scenario, the number of
shares of common stock to be issued in respect of the Depositary
Shares was determined by multiplying the number of Depositary
Shares by the number of shares of common stock anticipated to be
issued in respect of each Depositary Share, resulting in the
following: 431,250 Depositary Shares x 7.78 shares of
common stock per Depositary Share equals approximately
3.35 million shares of common stock. This procedure was
followed for each of the other participation scenarios.
|
24
BACKGROUND
OF THE TRANSACTIONS
Capital
Plan
As described in greater detail below, we are conducting the
Exchange Offer as part of our larger capital plan, which we
refer to as our Capital Plan, which is designed to
increase our common equity capital so that we may withstand
continued and potentially more adverse economic conditions and
credit scenarios that financial institutions, including larger
community banking institutions such as Midwest, currently face
and may continue to face in the foreseeable future. Our decision
to engage in the Exchange Offer, as well as the other components
of our Capital Plan, reflects the adverse effect that the severe
downturn in the real estate and housing markets has had on our
financial condition and capital base, as well as our assessment
of current regulatory expectations of adequate levels of common
equity capital. The Exchange Offer is a critical initial step
toward achieving the goals of our Capital Plan. We believe it
will be difficult, or impossible, to raise additional capital
through the other components of our Capital Plan unless we first
successfully complete the Exchange Offer.
Economic
Disruption and Effect on Midwest
Presently, the disruptions in the mortgage, real estate, credit,
and housing markets, both locally and nationally, that began in
the latter half of 2007 continue to have a major negative impact
on real estate and related industries, including residential and
commercial real estate development and lending, which has led to
a decrease in residential home sales and residential home
values, and a decrease in commercial real estate values and
declines in the financial condition of borrowers and their cash
flows. These disruptions continue to have a significant negative
impact on our loan portfolio, resulting in a significant
deterioration in credit quality and an increase in loan losses
and our allowance for loan losses. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, we reported net loan charge-offs of
$30.6 million and as of September 30, 2009 reported
nonaccrual loans equal to 7.9% of total loans. We believe it is
likely that the credit quality of our loan portfolio will
further deteriorate through the end of 2009. In addition, we
have experienced significant impairment charges and have
realized losses on investments in government sponsored
enterprises as the housing market declined. These events,
coupled with taking on increased debt and preferred stock
obligations in order to finance our acquisition of Northwest
Suburban in October 2007, have negatively impacted our capital
base and have left us vulnerable to continuing asset quality
deterioration. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
for a further discussion of our recent financial results.
Regulatory
Expectations After the Results of SCAP
Our decision to engage in the Exchange Offer and under our
Capital Plan was also motivated by the results of the
Supervisory Capital Assessment Program, or the SCAP,
which consisted of a review of the capital of the 19 largest
U.S. banking institutions by Federal banking regulators.
The SCAP was instituted by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (the
Federal Reserve)
, the FDIC and the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency as part of the
implementation of the USGs Capital Assistance Program, or
the CAP, which has been discontinued. Based on the
SCAP review, Federal banking regulators determined that 10 of
the 19 banking institutions needed to raise additional capital
and to submit a capital plan to their Federal banking regulators
by June 8, 2009 for their review.
Even though we were not included in the group of 19 banking
institutions reviewed under the SCAP, we have closely assessed
the announced SCAP results, particularly noting that
(1) the SCAP credit loss assumptions applied to regional
banking institutions included in the SCAP are based on a more
adverse economic and credit scenario and (2) Federal
banking regulators are focused on the composition of regulatory
capital. Specifically, the regulators have indicated that voting
common equity should be the dominant element of Tier 1
capital and have established a 4% Tier 1 common ratio as a
threshold for determining capital needs.
Although the SCAP results are not applicable to us, we believe
they do express general regulatory expectations. As of
September 30, 2009, Midwest was under capitalized based on
a ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 7.95%, a
ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6.05%
and a ratio of Tier 1
25
capital to average tangible assets of 4.26%. Additionally, the
Bank remained well-capitalized as of September 30, 2009.
Notwithstanding these capital ratios, we believe an improvement
in the composition of our regulatory capital is necessary in
order to adequately position us in a continued and potentially
more adverse economic and credit scenario. Accordingly, through
the Exchange Offer and the other capital enhancement proposals
of our Capital Plan, we seek to substantially increase our
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets
(Tier 1 Common Ratio)
and tangible common equity to
tangible assets ratio
(TCE)
. Our Tier 1 common ratio
and TCE were (1.24)% and (1.01)%, respectively, as of
September 30, 2009. See Regulatory Capital
Ratios Non-GAAP Reconciliation of Certain
Ratios to Stockholders Equity for a reconciliation
of TCE and other ratios and a discussion of our use of non-GAAP
financial measures in this document. The completion of the
Exchange Offer would increase our Tier 1 common equity by
up to approximately $34.5 million to 0.14%, and our TCE by
up to approximately $34.5 million, or (0.02)%, on a pro
forma basis as of September 30, 2009 assuming the High
Participation Scenario (as defined under Unaudited Pro
Forma Financial Information) is achieved. See
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information for a
discussion of our pro forma capital ratios and the significant
assumptions that should be taken into consideration in assessing
these pro forma ratios. The successful completion of the other
components of our Capital Plan described below would further
increase our Tier 1 common equity and TCE.
Other
Components of the Capital Plan
This Exchange Offer is a critical component of our Capital Plan
that we have adopted in order to, among other things, improve
our common equity capital and raise additional capital to enable
us to better withstand and respond to adverse market conditions.
Presently, the principal capital improvement components of the
Capital Plan include:
|
|
|
|
|
effecting the Exchange Offer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
seeking an exchange by the USG of our existing Series T
Preferred Stock with an aggregate liquidation preference of
$84.784 million for another class of convertible preferred stock
to be issued to the USG, and to thereafter convert this new
class of preferred stock into shares of common stock, subject to
the adequate completion of the other components of our Capital
Plan as determined solely by the USG;
|
|
|
|
|
|
negotiating with our primary lender to restructure $55.0 million
of senior debt and $15.0 million of subordinated debt; and
|
|
|
|
seeking to engage in one or more private and/or public offerings
of common and/or convertible preferred stock.
|
In addition, our Capital Plan contemplates a number of
additional actions that we have taken or expect to take, such as
costs reduction initiatives through reductions in force, salary
reductions and other expense control activities.
We believe the successful completion of our Capital Plan would
substantially improve our capital position. However, we can
offer no assurances that we will be able to successfully
complete all or any of the proposals contemplated under our
Capital Plan, or that our Capital Plan will not need to be
materially modified in the future.
We have received non-binding indications of interest from
potential investors to invest additional equity capital in the
Company, in each case up to $190 million or more; however,
there can be no assurance that we will receive a commitment from
these or other parties prior to the scheduled expiration of the
Exchange Offer, and any such commitment may be subject to
conditions that we may be unable to satisfy. Additionally, we
have been in advanced discussions with USG regarding the terms
of a proposed transaction pursuant to which the USG would
exchange outstanding shares of our Series T Preferred Stock
for a new series of convertible preferred stock and thereafter
convert this new class of preferred stock into common stock.
Although the USG has delivered to us a letter expressing its
willingness to consent to such a transaction, the definitive
terms of such a transaction with the USG have not yet been
finalized. Such definitive terms are expected to include
conditions the satisfaction of which will be solely determinable
by the USG. Accordingly, you should not
26
assume that the Capital Plan or any portion of the Capital Plan
will be completed in whole, in part or as presently contemplated
when deciding whether to participate in the Exchange Offer.
In addition, we may act opportunistically to raise further
Tier 1 common equity or increase our Tier 1 common
ratio through sales of non-core assets and businesses and, if
necessary, the further issuance of common equity for cash.
The capital issuances as a result of the Exchange Offer,
together with any additional transactions in our Capital Plan
involving the issuance of equity securities, will be highly
dilutive to our common stockholders and may affect the market
price of our Common Stock.
The success of our overall Capital Plan is dependent on the
success of our Exchange Offer. We view this Exchange Offer as a
critical initial step toward achieving the Capital Plans
principal objective of increasing our common equity capital so
that we may withstand continued and potentially more adverse
economic conditions, as currently being experienced and as
assumed under the SCAP as applied to regional banking
institutions. Moreover, the potential investors who have
provided non-binding indications of interest to invest
additional equity capital in the Company have noted that a
successful completion of the Exchange Offer would be one of
their conditions to any potential investment, and the USG has
indicated that the completion of the Exchange Offer would be one
of the conditions to its permitting the conversion into common
stock of any of the Senior Preferred Stock proposed to be issued
to the USG in exchange for its Series T Preferred Stock.
Accordingly the greater the number of Depositary Shares that are
tendered and accepted in the Exchange Offer the better our
chances will be to successfully realize the other components of
our Capital Plan. If there is not a high level of participation
in the Exchange Offer, it may be difficult, or impossible, to
complete the other components of our Capital Plan. If we are not
able to successfully complete a substantial portion of our
Capital Plan, our business, and the value of our securities, may
be materially and adversely affected, and it will be more
difficult for us to meet the capital requirements expected of us
by our primary banking regulators.
Senior
Preferred Stock
Another important component of our Capital Plan relates to the
issuance of the Senior Preferred Stock (as defined below) to the
USG. We sold 84,875 shares of our Series T Preferred
Stock to the USG for $84.784 million in December of 2008
and issued a warrant which allows the USG to purchase
4.282 million shares of our common stock for $2.97 per
share (the
Warrant
) under the USGs Capital Purchase
Program. We are engaged in discussions with the USG to exchange
the shares of Series T Preferred Stock for a new series of
our preferred stock (the
Preferred Stock Issuance
).
Although the USG has expressed its willingness to consent to
such a transaction, the specific terms of any potential
transaction with the USG are subject to further negotiations
between the Company and the USG, and the specific terms are
expected to include conditions the satisfaction of which will be
solely determined by the USG. We anticipate that the new series
of preferred stock will rank senior as to dividend rights,
including cumulative dividend rights, and rights on liquidation,
winding-up
and dissolution to the Series A Preferred Stock (the
Senior Preferred Stock
). Immediately thereafter, we
anticipate that the Senior Preferred Stock will be converted
into shares of our common stock (the
Conversion
). At the
present time, we do not know the number of shares of our common
stock that will be issued to the USG upon the Conversion nor can
we provide any assurance that the Series T Preferred Stock
will be exchanged for the Senior Preferred Stock or that the
Conversion will occur.
The board of directors of Midwest is authorized under our
Certificate to issue up to one million shares of preferred stock
having a par value of $0.01 per share. The board of directors
has the authority to issue the preferred stock in one or more
series and to fix the number of shares constituting such series,
the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of
each such series and the qualifications, limitations or
restrictions thereof without any further vote or action by
common stockholders. The board intends to authorize the issuance
of the Senior Preferred Stock which will have the following
attributes. The following is a summary of what we anticipate
will be the proposed terms of such securities based upon our
discussions with the USG and on the
27
term sheet for securities to be issued under CAP posted on the
USGs website at
www.financialstability.gov/roadtostability/capitalassistance.html
and check on CAP Term Sheet.
The summary is not a complete recitation of all the terms, and
is subject to further changes by the USG. Although the USG has
expressed its willingness to consent to such a transaction, the
specific terms of any potential transaction with the USG are
subject to further negotiations between the Company and the USG,
and the specific terms are expected to include conditions the
satisfaction of which will be solely determined by the USG.
We intend to consummate the Conversion immediately after the
completion of the Preferred Stock Issuance.
Exchanging our Series T Preferred Stock for convertible
preferred shares, and then converting such shares to common
stock would result in the U.S. government acquiring a
significant interest in us, which may have an adverse effect on
operations and the market price of our common stock. Likewise,
the potential issuance of a significant amount of common stock
or equity convertible into our common stock to a private
investor or group of private investors may have the same effect.
Exchanging our Series T Preferred Stock for convertible
preferred shares and then converting such shares to common stock
will result in the USG having the ability to exercise
significant influence on matters submitted to stockholders for
approval, including the election of directors and certain
transactions, if the USG has voting rights with respect to these
shares. These The USG may also transfer all, or a portion, of
its shares to another person or entity and, in the event of such
a transfer, that person or entity could become a significant
stockholder of us. In addition, any issuance of a large amount
of common equity or equity convertible into common to a private
investor or group of investors may pose similar risks.
The Senior Preferred Stock when issued will qualify as
Tier 1 Capital and will be issued in the form of cumulative
convertible preferred stock. The Senior Preferred Stock will pay
a cumulative annual dividend at a rate of 9% until converted
into common stock. The conversion of the Senior Preferred Stock
into common stock will be at a price to be agreed upon by the
USG and the Company.
The outstanding Senior Preferred Stock may be converted in whole
or in part at the option of Midwest into shares of our common
stock, subject to the approval of the applicable primary federal
regulator. We expect that the shares also will be convertible at
the option of the USG upon specified corporate events, such as
certain sales, mergers or changes of control. Upon any
conversion, we would also pay any accrued and unpaid dividends
in either cash or in shares of common stock valued for this
purpose at the closing price on the second preceding trading day.
The outstanding Senior Preferred Stock will be non-voting, other
than as to class voting rights on matters that could adversely
affect the shares and if dividends are not paid in full for six
dividend quarters, whether or not consecutive, the USG will have
the right to elect two additional directors to Midwests
board. The right to elect directors would end when full
dividends have been paid for four consecutive dividend periods.
We expect that for so long as the Senior Preferred Stock is
outstanding or the USG owns any common stock of Midwest, common
stock dividends may not exceed $0.01 per quarter, without the
approval of the USG. In addition, we anticipate that for so long
as the USG owns any Senior Preferred Stock, the USG will have to
approve any share repurchases and no dividends may be declared
or paid on any junior preferred shares, preferred shares ranking
pari passu, or common shares, and no such shares may be
repurchased or redeemed, unless all accrued and unpaid dividends
on the Senior Preferred Stock are fully paid. We will be
required to file a shelf registration statement for the common
stock to be issued upon the Conversion, will grant registration
rights to the USG and will apply to Nasdaq to list the shares of
common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market.
We believe that following the Conversion, the USG will agree to
take reasonable steps to sell a minimum of 20% of the common
stock during each of the following years that it may hold such
shares and that Midwest will have the right to seek to
repurchase the common shares following the Conversion at a price
equal to the greater of the Conversion price and the current
market price (calculated based on the average closing price
28
during the 20 trading day period beginning on the day after
notice of repurchase is given). However, any such repurchase
must be made with the proceeds of a common stock offering or
additions to retained earnings.
Midwest and its covered officers and employees will have to
agree to comply with the USGs rules, regulations and
guidance with respect to executive compensation, transparency,
accountability and monitoring, as published and in effect at the
time of the investment closing. At the present time, Midwest is
complying with the USGs existing rules and regulations
with respect to executive compensation. Midwest has announced
that it suspended its only executive bonus program
its management incentive compensation plan.
Therefore, Midwest does not have a bonus plan subject to the
executive compensation plan rules. In addition, Midwest did not
pay bonuses to its top five senior executive officers for 2008.
As required by these rules, the Company does not pay severance
to its SEOs and the next five most highly compensated employees.
Midwest does not have sufficient shares of common stock
authorized to cover the Conversion. As a consequence, Midwest is
seeking approval for the issuance of new common shares pursuant
to the Authorized Share Increase and the Common Stock Issuance.
If the Authorized Share Increase and the Common Stock Issuance
are not approved, we anticipate that the Conversion price for
the Senior Preferred Stock will be reduced and that the dividend
rate on the Senior Preferred Stock will increase.
Preferred
Stock Amendments and Preferred Stock Issuance
We are also seeking separate approval from our holders of our
Depositary Shares to approve the Preferred Stock Amendments and
the issuance of the Senior Preferred Stock to the USG.
Under Delaware law and our Certificate, the affirmative vote of
holders, as of the close of business on the record date for the
Preferred Proxy Statement, of two-thirds of the Depositary
Shares, voting as a class, are required to approve each of the
Dividend Blocker Amendment, the Director Amendment and the
Preferred Stock Issuance.
We anticipate that the USG will vote its Series T Preferred
Stock in the same proportion as the Depositary Shares, whether
such shares vote in the same class with or as a separate class
from the Series T Preferred Stock, with respect to the
Preferred Stock Issuance and the fourth bullet point under the
Dividend Blocker Amendment. The USG will not vote with respect
to any other Preferred Stock Amendments or the Common Stock
Amendments.
For additional information regarding the Preferred Stock
Amendments, please refer to the Preferred Proxy Statement.
AUTHORIZED
SHARE INCREASE
On August 25, 2009, the board of directors adopted
resolutions (1) declaring that an amendment to
Midwests Certificate to increase the number of authorized
shares of our common stock from 64 million to four billion
shares was advisable and (2) directing that a proposal to
approve the Authorized Share Increase be submitted to the
holders of our common stock for their approval.
The form of the proposed amendment to our Certificate to
increase the number of authorized shares is attached to this
proxy statement as
Annex A
. The Authorized Share
Increase will increase the number of authorized shares of our
common stock from 64 million shares to four billion shares.
We will use the newly authorized shares to effectuate the
Conversion. We will also use shares of our common stock when we
consummate the Exchange Offer. We do not know at the present
time exactly how many shares of common stock will be issued in
the Exchange Offer. The remaining authorized but unissued shares
of common stock will be used for general corporate purposes. As
with our existing shares of common stock, none of the newly
authorized shares of common stock will have preemptive rights.
29
Even if the stockholders approve the Authorized Share Increase,
the board of directors reserves its right to elect to abandon
the Authorized Share Increase, if it determines, in its sole
discretion, that the Authorized Share Increase is no longer in
the best interests of Midwest and its stockholders.
If the Authorized Share Increase or the Common Stock Issuance is
not approved, we anticipate that the Conversion price for the
Senior Preferred Stock will be reduced, and that the dividend
rate on the Senior Preferred Stock will increase.
The issuance of the Senior Preferred Stock to the USG in
exchange for our Series T Preferred Stock is an important
component of our Capital Plan. See Background of the
Transactions, for a discussion of the reasons for the
Capital Plan and the terms of the Senior Preferred Stock.
Background
and Reasons for the Conversion of Senior Preferred Stock into
Shares of Common Stock and Increase in Authorized Shares of
Common Stock
We are discussing with the USG a possible exchange of the shares
of Series T Preferred Stock for the Senior Preferred Stock.
Immediately thereafter, we anticipate that the Conversion will
be consummated thereby converting the Senior Preferred Stock
into shares of our common stock.
Through the Exchange Offer and the other capital enhancement
proposals of our Capital Plan, we seek to substantially increase
our Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets
(Tier 1 Common Ratio)
and tangible common equity to
tangible assets ratio
(TCE)
. Our Tier 1 common ratio
and TCE were (1.24)% and (1.01)%, respectively, as of
September 30, 2009, See Regulatory Capital
Ratios Non-GAAP Reconciliation of Certain
Ratios to Stockholders Equity for a reconciliation
of TCE and other ratios and a discussion of our use of non-GAAP
financial measures in this document.
We anticipate that the Conversion will require more shares of
common stock than are currently authorized and available for
issuance under our Certificate. Accordingly, we need to amend
our Certificate in order to increase the number of authorized
shares of common stock so there will be sufficient authorized
common stock to issue in connection with the Conversion.
We are proposing to increase the number of shares of common
stock authorized for issuance to four billion shares. Some of
these newly authorized shares may be used for general corporate
purposes. Management believes that, to the extent the increase
in authorized shares is not used to effectuate the Conversion,
as described above, the Authorized Share Increase will maintain
Midwests flexibility to respond efficiently to future
business and financing needs and other opportunities.
Effect of
the Authorized Share Increase on Stockholders
As of the date of this proxy statement, we are authorized to
issue up to 64 million shares of common stock. If the
Authorized Share Increase is approved, we will file a
certificate of amendment with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware to amend our Certificate to increase the
number of shares of common stock we are authorized to issue to
four billion shares. This will not change the number of shares
of common stock that you own, but we will have the power to
issue a significant number of additional shares of common stock
which, if issued, would result in substantial dilution to your
current ownership. We contemplate issuing a significant amount
of common stock to accomplish the goals of our Capital Plan. The
issuance of even a portion of the additional common stock
contemplated under our Capital Plan will be dilutive,
potentially significantly, to holders of our common stock,
including participants in the Exchange Offer. For a discussion
of the terms of the Senior Preferred Stock and the restrictions
which may be imposed upon holders of our common stock, including
the right of the USG to elect directors and the possible
restructuring of executive compensation plans in order to comply
with the USG rules, see Background of the
Transactions Senior Preferred Stock.
Conversion
of Senior Preferred Stock into Common Stock
We will issue some of the newly authorized shares to effectuate
the Conversion thereby converting the Senior Preferred Stock
into shares of common stock. Our common stock is currently
listed on the NASDAQ
30
Global Market, and we intend to apply for the listing of these
additional shares on the NASDAQ Global Market. The remaining
newly authorized shares of common stock will remain unissued and
may be used for general corporate purposes in the future.
If our stockholders do not approve the Authorized Share
Increase, the Conversion will not be effectuated. If we are
unable to convert the Senior Preferred Securities into common
stock, we will be unable to fully realize the anticipated
benefits of our Capital Plan.
If the Authorized Share Increase or the Common Stock Issuance is
not approved, we anticipate that the Conversion price will be
reduced, thereby increasing the number of shares of common stock
the USG will acquire upon the Conversion and that the dividend
rate on the Senior Preferred Stock will increase.
Effect on
Voting Power of Holders of Common Stock
The Senior Preferred Stock when issued will generally vote as a
separate class. The Senior Preferred Stock will not, however, be
entitled to vote on any of the Amendments or the Adjournment
Proposal. Therefore, the conversion of the Senior Preferred
Stock into shares of common stock will only affect the voting
power of holders of common stock with respect to matters that as
a matter of Delaware law require a class vote of holders of
common stock in that the currently existing common stock may
have the ability, in a class vote, to block the adoption of a
proposal. After the Conversion, the current holders of common
stock would vote on such matters with the USG as the holder of
common stock issued upon the Conversion, if the USG has voting
rights with respect to those shares.
After approval of the Authorized Share Increase, we will have
the following approximate numbers of shares of common stock
issued and outstanding based on the levels of participation in
our Exchange Offer indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
Number of Issued and
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Issued and
|
|
Outstanding Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Shares of
|
|
Common Stock after
|
|
|
Level of participation
|
|
Common Stock as of the
|
|
the Consummation of
|
|
|
in the Exchange Offer(1)
|
|
Record Date
|
|
the Exchange Offer
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousands of shares)
|
|
(Thousands of shares)
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
28,116
|
|
|
|
31,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
28,116
|
|
|
|
34,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
2
/
3
%
|
|
|
28,116
|
|
|
|
37,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
28,116
|
|
|
|
38,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
28,116
|
|
|
|
41,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The same assumptions and methods of calculation as set forth in
footnotes (2)-(7) to the table on page 24 above apply to
the levels of participation in the table above.
|
Following approval of the Authorized Share Increase and the
Common Stock Issuance and the consummation of the Conversion,
and assuming 100% participation in the Exchange Offer, we
anticipate that the holders of our common stock outstanding as
of the Record Date will lose significant voting power with
respect to their ability to veto matters that require a vote of
holders of common stock voting as a class.
Significant
Stockholders
After the approval of the Authorized Share Increase and the
Common Stock Issuance and consummation of the Conversion, we
expect that the USG will be a significant stockholder.
31
Authorized
but Unissued Shares
In addition, after approval of the Authorized Share Increase, we
will have the following approximate number of authorized but
unissued shares, depending on the levels of participation in the
Exchange Offer indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Number of
|
|
|
|
Authorized but
|
|
|
|
Unissued Shares of
|
|
|
|
Common Stock after
|
|
|
|
Approval of the
|
|
Level of Participation
|
|
Authorized Share
|
|
in the Exchange Offer(1)
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
(Thousands of shares)
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
3,968,530
|
|
50%
|
|
|
3,965,176
|
|
66
2
/
3
%
|
|
|
3,962,940
|
|
75%
|
|
|
3,961,821
|
|
100%
|
|
|
3,958,467
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The same assumptions and methods of calculation as set forth in
footnotes (1) and (2) to the table on page 24
above apply to the levels of participation in the tables above
and each amount was then subtracted from four billion, the
number of shares of common stock that Midwest would be
authorized to issue after approval of the Authorized Share
Increase and the Common Stock Issuance.
|
Any authorized but unissued shares of common stock would be
available for issuance at the discretion of the board of
directors from time to time for corporate purposes subject to
any shares reserved for issuance. We believe that the
availability of the additional shares would provide us with
additional flexibility to meet business and financing needs as
they arise. However, if we issue any of the newly authorized
shares, existing holders of our common stock may be diluted.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Delaware law and our Certificate, holders of our common
stock will not be entitled to dissenters rights or
appraisal rights with respect to the Authorized Share Increase.
Required
Vote and Recommendation
Under Delaware law and our Certificate, the affirmative vote of
holders of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding
as of the Record Date is required to approve the Authorized
Share Increase. In connection with the Exchange Offer, the
holders of Depositary Shares participating in the Exchange Offer
will have granted their Proxy Instructions with respect to the
Authorized Share Increase in accordance with the procedures set
forth in the Letter of Transmittal and following the Record
Date, the shares of common stock issued in respect of such
Depositary Shares will be subject to an irrevocable proxy
granted by the Voting Trustee in favor of the Authorized Share
Increase.
The board unanimously recommends approval of the Authorized
Share Increase.
32
REVERSE
STOCK SPLIT
On August 25, 2009, the board of directors adopted
resolutions (1) declaring that an amendment to our
Certificate to effect a reverse stock split, as described below,
was advisable and (2) directing that a proposal to approve
the Reverse Stock Split be submitted to the holders of our
common stock for their approval.
The form of the proposed amendment to Midwests Certificate
to effect the Reverse Stock Split is attached to this proxy
statement as
Annex B
. If approved by our
stockholders, the Reverse Stock Split would permit (but not
require) the board of directors to effect a reverse stock split
of our common stock at any time prior to December 31, 2010
at one of four reverse split ratios,
1-for-100,
1-for-150,
1-for-200,
or
1-for-250,
as determined by the board of directors in its sole discretion.
We believe that leaving the ratio to the discretion of the board
of directors (provided that it is one of the four proposed
ratios) will provide Midwest with the flexibility to implement
the Reverse Stock Split in a manner designed to maximize the
anticipated benefits for our stockholders. In determining a
ratio, if any, following the receipt of stockholder approval,
the board of directors may consider, among other things, factors
such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the historical trading price and trading volume of our common
stock;
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of our common stock outstanding, including
the number of shares of our common stock issued in the Exchange
Offer and as a result of the Conversion (if the Authorized Share
Increase and the Common Stock Issuance are approved);
|
|
|
|
the then-prevailing trading price and trading volume of our
common stock and the anticipated impact of the Reverse Stock
Split on the trading market for our common stock;
|
|
|
|
the anticipated impact of a particular ratio on our ability to
reduce administrative and transactional costs; and
|
|
|
|
prevailing general market and economic conditions.
|
Even if the stockholders approve the Reverse Stock Split, the
board of directors reserves its right to elect to abandon the
Reverse Stock Split, including any or all proposed reverse stock
split ratios, if it determines, in its sole discretion, that the
Reverse Stock Split is no longer in the best interests of
Midwest and its stockholders.
Depending on the ratio for the Reverse Stock Split determined by
the board of directors, 100, 150, 200 or 250 shares of
existing common stock, as determined by the board of directors,
will be combined into one share of common stock. The number of
shares of common stock issued and outstanding will therefore be
reduced, depending upon the reverse stock split ratio determined
by the board of directors. The amendment to the Certificate that
is filed to effect the Reverse Stock Split, if any, will include
only the reverse split ratio determined by the board of
directors to be in the best interests of stockholders and all of
the other proposed amendments at different ratios will be
abandoned.
If the Reverse Stock Split is effected, we will also
proportionately reduce the number of authorized shares of our
common stock, as described below in Authorized
Shares. Accordingly, we are also proposing to adopt
amendments to our Certificate to reduce the total number of
authorized shares of common stock, depending on the reverse
split ratio determined by the board of directors. The amendment
to the Certificate that is filed, if any, will include only the
total number of authorized shares of common stock determined by
the board of directors to be in the best interests of
stockholders and all of the other proposed amendments for
different numbers of authorized shares will be abandoned. If the
board of directors abandons the Reverse Stock Split, it will
also abandon the related reduction in the number of authorized
shares.
The Reverse Stock Split, if approved by our stockholders, would
become effective upon the filing (the
Effective Time
) of
a certificate of amendment to our Certificate with the Secretary
of State of the State of Delaware. The exact timing of the
filing of the Reverse Stock Split will be determined by the
board of directors based on its evaluation as to when such
action will be the most advantageous to Midwest and its
stockholders. In addition, the board of directors reserves the
right, notwithstanding stockholder approval and without further
action by the stockholders, to elect not to proceed with the
Reverse Stock Split if, at any time
33
prior to filing the certificate of amendment, the board of
directors, in its sole discretion, determines that it is no
longer in Midwests best interests and the best interests
of its stockholders to proceed with the Reverse Stock Split. If
a certificate of amendment effecting the Reverse Stock Split has
not been filed with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware by the close of business on December 31, 2010, the
board of directors will abandon the Reverse Stock Split.
To avoid the existence of fractional shares of our common stock,
stockholders of record who would otherwise hold fractional
shares as a result of the Reverse Stock Split will be entitled
to receive cash (without interest) in lieu of such fractional
shares from our agent. The total amount of cash that will be
paid to holders of fractional shares following the Reverse Stock
Split will be an amount equal to the net proceeds (after
customary brokerage commissions, other expenses and applicable
withholding taxes) attributable to the sale of such fractional
shares following the aggregation and sale by our agent of all
fractional shares otherwise issuable. Holders of fractional
shares as a result of the Reverse Stock Split will be paid such
proceeds on a pro rata basis, depending on the fractional amount
of shares that they owned.
Background
and Reasons for the Reverse Stock Split
The board is submitting the Reverse Stock Split to stockholders
for approval with the primary intent of increasing the price of
our common stock to make our common stock more attractive to a
broader range of institutional and other investors. We believe
the Reverse Stock Split will also allow us to restore our common
stock price to a normalized trading level, which will enhance
liquidity. In addition to increasing the price of our common
stock, the Reverse Stock Split would also reduce certain of our
costs, such as proxy solicitation fees. Accordingly, for these
and other reasons discussed below, we believe that effecting the
Reverse Stock Split is in Midwests and our
stockholders best interests.
We believe that the Reverse Stock Split will make our common
stock more attractive to a broader range of institutional and
other investors, as we have been advised that the current market
price of our common stock may affect its acceptability to
certain institutional investors, professional investors and
other members of the investing public. Many brokerage houses and
institutional investors have internal policies and practices
that either prohibit them from investing in low-priced stocks or
tend to discourage individual brokers from recommending
low-priced stocks to their customers. In addition, some of those
policies and practices may function to make the processing of
trades in low-priced stocks economically unattractive to
brokers. Moreover, because brokers commissions on
low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the
stock price than commissions on higher-priced stocks, the
current average price per share of common stock can result in
individual stockholders paying transaction costs representing a
higher percentage of their total share value than would be the
case if the share price were substantially higher. We believe
that the Reverse Stock Split will make our common stock a more
attractive and cost effective investment for many investors,
which will enhance the liquidity of the holders of our common
stock.
Nasdaq Rule 5450 provides that in order for Midwest to
maintain its listing of common stock on the Nasdaq Global
Market, the common stock must, among other things, maintain a
minimum bid price per share of $1.00. If a company fails to meet
the continued listing requirement for minimum bid price for a
period of 30 consecutive trading days, Nasdaq will notify the
issuer of the deficiency and the company will have a period of
180 calendar days from such notification to achieve compliance.
Companies listed on the Nasdaq Global Market, like Midwest, are
provided one automatic
180-day
period to regain compliance, which they can do by achieving a
$1.00 closing bid price for a minimum of ten consecutive
business days. If Midwest cannot regain compliance in that time,
Midwest can seek to transfer to the Nasdaq Capital Market in
order to take advantage of the Capital Markets second
180-day
compliance period, provided it is in compliance with all other
Capital Market inclusion requirements (except for the bid price
requirement).
34
The Company received a letter from Nasdaq on September 15,
2009, notifying it of its failure to maintain a minimum closing
bid price of $1.00 per share on its common stock over the
preceding 30 consecutive business days as required by Nasdaq
Marketplace Rule 5450(a)(1), (the
Bid Price Rule
).
The letter stated that the Company had until March 15, 2010
to demonstrate compliance by maintaining a minimum closing bid
price of at least $1.00 for a minimum of ten consecutive
business days. The Nasdaq letter was issued in accordance with
standard Nasdaq procedures.
If the Company does not regain compliance with the Bid Price
Rule by March 15, 2010, Nasdaq will notify the Company that
its common stock is subject to delisting from Nasdaq. In that
event, the Company may be eligible for an additional grace
period if it can transfer its common stock from the Nasdaq
Global Market to the Nasdaq Capital Market. To do this, the
Company must meet the Markets initial listing criteria
except for the bid price requirement. To take advantage of this
alternative, the Company must file an application to transfer
its common stock to the Nasdaq Capital Market. If the
application is approved, Nasdaq will notify the Company that it
has been granted an additional 180 calendar day compliance
period. If the Company is not eligible for an additional
compliance period, Nasdaq will provide the Company with written
notification that its common stock will be delisted. At that
time, the Company may appeal Nasdaqs determination to
delist its common stock to a Hearings Panel.
The deficiency letter has no effect on the listing of the
Companys common stock at this time and its common stock
will continue to trade on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol MBHI.
Also, in the future we could fall out of compliance with other
minimum criteria for continued listing, including minimum market
capitalization, minimum stockholders equity and minimum
public float. A failure to meet any of these other continued
listing requirements could result in delisting. Delisting would
have an adverse effect on the liquidity of our common stock and,
as a result, the market price for our common stock might become
more volatile. Delisting could also make it more difficult for
us to raise additional capital. Although we expect that quotes
for our common stock would continue to be available on the OTC
Bulletin Board or on the Pink Sheets, such
alternatives are generally considered to be less efficient
markets, and our stock price, as well as the liquidity of our
common stock, may be adversely impacted as a result.
Reducing the number of outstanding shares of our common stock
through the Reverse Stock Split is intended, absent other
factors, to increase the per share market price of our common
stock. However, other factors, such as our financial results,
market conditions and the market perception of our business may
adversely affect the market price of our common stock. As a
result, there can be no assurance that the Reverse Stock Split,
if completed, will result in the intended benefits described
above, that the market price of our common stock will increase
following the Reverse Stock Split or that the market price of
our common stock will not decrease in the future. Additionally,
we cannot assure you that the market price per share of our
common stock after a Reverse Stock Split will increase in
proportion to the reduction in the number of shares of our
common stock outstanding before the Reverse Stock Split.
Accordingly, the total market capitalization of our common stock
after the Reverse Stock Split may be lower than the total market
capitalization before the Reverse Stock Split.
In addition to increasing the price of our common stock, we
believe that a Reverse Stock Split will provide Midwest and its
stockholders with other benefits. Currently, the fees that we
pay to list our shares on the NASDAQ Global Market are based on
the number of shares we have outstanding. Also, the fees that we
pay for custody and clearing services, the fees that we pay to
the SEC to register securities for issuance and the costs of our
proxy solicitations are all based on or related to the number of
shares being held, cleared or registered as applicable. Reducing
the number of shares that are outstanding and that will be
issued in the future may reduce the amount of fees and tax that
we pay to these organizations and agencies, as well as other
organizations and agencies that levy charges based on the number
of shares rather than the value of the shares.
Effect of
the Reverse Stock Split on Holders of Outstanding Common
Stock
Shares of common stock issued and outstanding prior to the
Exchange Offer, as well as shares of common stock issued in
exchange for Depositary Shares in connection with the Exchange
Offer and issued upon the Conversion, will be affected by the
Reverse Stock Split as common stock. The number of shares of
common
35
stock that will be affected by the Reverse Stock Split depends
on the number of Depositary Shares that are tendered and
accepted for exchange into common stock in connection with the
Exchange Offer. The table below shows the approximate number of
shares of common stock that are expected to be affected by the
Reverse Stock Split, assuming the Authorized Share Increase is
approved, and depending on the levels of participation in the
Exchange Offer indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Issued and
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
that will be
|
Level of Participation
|
|
Affected by the
|
in the Exchange Offer(1)
|
|
Reverse Stock Split
|
|
|
(Thousands of shares)
|
|
25%
|
|
|
31,470
|
|
50%
|
|
|
34,824
|
|
66
2
/
3
%
|
|
|
37,060
|
|
75%
|
|
|
38,179
|
|
100%
|
|
|
41,533
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The same assumptions and methods of calculation as set forth in
footnotes (1) and (2) to the table on page 24
above apply to the levels of participation in the table above.
|
Depending on the ratio for the Reverse Stock Split determined by
the board of directors, 100, 150, 200 or 250 shares of
existing common stock, as determined by the board of directors,
will be combined into one new share of common stock. The number
of shares of common stock issued and outstanding will therefore
be reduced, depending upon the reverse stock split ratio
determined by the board of directors. The table below shows the
number of authorized and issued (or reserved for issuance)
shares of common stock that will result from the listed
hypothetical reverse stock split ratios (without giving effect
to the treatment of fractional shares), depending on the levels
of participation in the Exchange Offer indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Number of Shares of
|
|
|
Common Stock Issued and
|
|
|
Outstanding Plus Shares of
|
|
|
Common Stock Reserved for Issuance
|
Level of Participation
|
|
Following the Reverse Stock Split
|
in the Exchange Offer(1)
|
|
1 for 100
|
|
1 for 150
|
|
1 for 200
|
|
1 for 250
|
|
|
(Thousands of shares)
|
|
25%
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
50%
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
66
2
/
3
%
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
75%
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
100%
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Calculated by applying the applicable Reverse Stock Split ratio
to the numbers derived in the immediately preceding table.
|
The actual number of shares outstanding after giving effect to
the Reverse Stock Split, if implemented, will depend on the
reverse stock split ratio that is ultimately determined by the
board of directors, whether the Authorized Share Increase and
the Common Stock Issuance are approved and the Conversion is
consummated and, the number of Depositary Shares that are
tendered and accepted for exchange in connection with the
Exchange Offer.
If approved and effected, the Reverse Stock Split will be
realized simultaneously and in the same ratio for all of our
common stock. The Reverse Stock Split will affect all holders of
our common stock uniformly
36
and will not affect any stockholders percentage ownership
interest in Midwest, except that as described below in
Fractional Shares, record holders of
common stock otherwise entitled to a fractional share as a
result of the Reverse Stock Split will receive a cash payment in
lieu of such fractional share. These cash payments will reduce
the number of post-Reverse Stock Split holders of our common
stock to the extent there are currently stockholders who would
otherwise receive less than one share of common stock after the
Reverse Stock Split. In addition, the Reverse Stock Split will
not affect any stockholders proportionate voting power
(subject to the treatment of fractional shares).
The Reverse Stock Split may result in some stockholders owning
odd lots of less than 100 shares of common
stock. Odd lot shares may be more difficult to sell, and
brokerage commissions and other costs of transactions in odd
lots are generally somewhat higher than the costs of
transactions in round lots of even multiples of
100 shares.
After the Effective Time, our common stock will have new
Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures
(CUSIP)
numbers, which is a number used to identify our
equity securities, and stock certificates with the older CUSIP
numbers will need to be exchanged for stock certificates with
the new CUSIP numbers by following the procedures described
below.
Beneficial
Holders of Common Stock (i.e. stockholders who hold in street
name)
Upon the Reverse Stock Split, we intend to treat shares held by
stockholders through a bank, broker, custodian or other nominee,
in the same manner as registered stockholders whose shares are
registered in their names. Banks, brokers, custodians or other
nominees will be instructed to effect the Reverse Stock Split
for their beneficial holders holding our common stock in street
name. However, these banks, brokers, custodians or other
nominees may have different procedures than registered
stockholders for processing the Reverse Stock Split and making
payment for fractional shares. If a stockholder holds shares of
our common stock with a bank, broker, custodian or other nominee
and has any questions in this regard, stockholders are
encouraged to contact their bank, broker, custodian or other
nominee.
Registered
Book-Entry Holders of Common Stock (i.e.
stockholders that are registered on the transfer agents
books and records but do not hold stock certificates)
Certain of our registered holders of common stock may hold some
or all of their shares electronically in book-entry form with
the transfer agent. These stockholders do not have stock
certificates evidencing their ownership of the common stock.
They are, however, provided with a statement reflecting the
number of shares registered in their accounts.
If a stockholder holds registered shares in book-entry form with
the transfer agent, the stockholder will be sent a transmittal
letter by our transfer agent after the Effective Time and will
need to return a properly completed and duly executed
transmittal letter in order to receive any cash payment in lieu
of fractional shares or any other distributions, if any, that
may be payable to holders of record following the Reverse Stock
Split.
Holders
of Certificated Shares of Common Stock
Stockholders holding shares of our common stock in certificated
form will be sent a transmittal letter by the transfer agent
after the Effective Time. The letter of transmittal will contain
instructions on how a stockholder should surrender his, her or
its certificate(s) representing shares of our common stock (the
Old Certificates
) to the transfer agent in exchange for
certificates representing the appropriate number of whole shares
of post-Reverse Stock Split common stock (the
New
Certificates
). No New Certificates will be issued to a
stockholder until such stockholder has surrendered all Old
Certificates, together with a properly completed and executed
letter of transmittal, to the transfer agent. No stockholder
will be required to pay a transfer or other fee to exchange his,
her or its Old Certificates. Stockholders will then receive a
New Certificate(s) representing the number of whole shares of
common stock that they are entitled as a result of the Reverse
Stock Split. Until surrendered, we will deem outstanding Old
Certificates held by stockholders to be cancelled and only to
represent the number of whole shares of post-Reverse Stock Split
common stock to which these stockholders are entitled and the
right to receive cash with respect to any fractional shares of
post reverse
37
stock split common stock. Any Old Certificates submitted for
exchange, whether because of a sale, transfer or other
disposition of stock, will automatically be exchanged for New
Certificates. If an Old Certificate has a restrictive legend on
the back of the Old Certificate(s), the New Certificate will be
issued with the same restrictive legends that are on the back of
the Old Certificate(s). If a stockholder is entitled to a
payment in lieu of any fractional share interest, such payment
will be made as described below under
Fractional Shares.
Stockholders should not destroy any stock certificate(s) and
should not submit any stock certificate(s) until requested to do
so.
Fractional
Shares
We do not currently intend to issue fractional shares in
connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Therefore, we do not
expect to issue certificates representing fractional shares.
Stockholders of record who would otherwise hold fractional
shares because the number of shares of common stock they hold
before the Reverse Stock Split is not evenly divisible by the
split ratio ultimately determined by the board of directors will
be entitled to receive cash (without interest and subject to
applicable withholding taxes) in lieu of such fractional shares
from our agent. Our agent will aggregate all fractional shares
following the Reverse Stock Split and sell them into the market.
The total amount of cash that will be paid to holders of
fractional shares following the Reverse Stock Split will be an
amount equal to the net proceeds (after customary brokerage
commissions and other expenses) attributable to such sale.
Holders of fractional shares as a result of the Reverse Stock
Split will be paid such proceeds on a pro rata basis, depending
on the fractional amount of shares that they owned.
If a stockholder who holds shares in certificated form is
entitled to a payment in lieu of any fractional share interest,
the stockholder will receive a check as soon as practicable
after the Effective Time and after the stockholder has submitted
an executed transmittal letter and surrendered all Old
Certificates, as described above in Holders of
Certificated Shares of Common Stock. If a stockholder
holds shares of our common stock with a bank, broker, custodian
or other nominee, those stockholders should contact their bank,
broker, custodian or other nominee for information on the
treatment and processing of fractional shares by their bank,
broker, custodian or other nominee. By signing and cashing the
check, stockholders will warrant that they owned the shares of
common stock for which they received a cash payment. The cash
payment is subject to applicable federal, state and foreign
income tax and state abandoned property laws. Stockholders will
not be entitled to receive interest for the period of time
between the Effective Time and the date payment is received.
Authorized
Shares
If and when the board of directors elects to effect the Reverse
Stock Split, we will also reduce the number of authorized shares
of common stock in proportion to the reverse stock split ratio.
The reduction in the number of authorized shares would be
effected by the filing of the certificate of amendment to our
Certificate, as discussed above. The table below shows the
number to which authorized shares of common stock will be
reduced resulting from the listed hypothetical reverse stock
split ratios indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Authorized Shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
Following the Reverse Stock Split
|
|
|
If the Authorized Share
|
|
|
Increase is Approved
|
|
|
(Thousands of shares)
|
|
1 for 100
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
1 for 150
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
1 for 200
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
1 for 250
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
If the Authorized Share Increase or the Common Stock Issuance
are not approved, the Conversion will not be consummated. The
actual number of authorized shares after giving effect to the
Reverse Stock Split, if implemented, will depend on the reverse
stock split ratio that is ultimately determined by the board of
directors and whether the Authorized Share Increase is approved.
38
As a result of the reduction in authorized shares of common
stock, the same proportion of authorized but unissued shares to
shares authorized and issued (or reserved for issuance) would be
maintained if the board of directors elects to effect the
Reverse Stock Split. The table below shows the total number of
authorized but unissued shares of common stock that is expected
to result from the capital reduction resulting from the listed
hypothetical reverse stock split ratios (without giving effect
to the treatment of fractional shares), assuming approval of the
Authorized Share Increase and depending on the levels of
participation in the Exchange Offer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Number of Authorized but
|
|
|
Unissued Shares of Common Stock
|
Level of Participation
|
|
Following the Reverse Stock Split
|
in the Exchange Offer(1)
|
|
1 for 100
|
|
1 for 150
|
|
1 for 200
|
|
1 for 250
|
|
|
(Thousands of shares)
|
|
25%
|
|
|
39,685
|
|
|
|
26,457
|
|
|
|
19,843
|
|
|
|
15,874
|
|
50%
|
|
|
39,652
|
|
|
|
26,435
|
|
|
|
19,826
|
|
|
|
15,861
|
|
75%
|
|
|
39,629
|
|
|
|
26,420
|
|
|
|
19,815
|
|
|
|
15,852
|
|
66.67%
|
|
|
39,618
|
|
|
|
26,412
|
|
|
|
19,809
|
|
|
|
15,847
|
|
100%
|
|
|
39,585
|
|
|
|
26,390
|
|
|
|
19,792
|
|
|
|
15,834
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The approximate number of authorized but unissued shares of
common stock following the Reverse Stock Split was calculated by
subtracting the number of shares of common stock outstanding
plus shares of common stock reserved for issuance (as described
on page 24) from the number of authorized shares of common
stock following the Reverse Stock Split (as described in the
previous table).
|
The actual number of authorized but unissued shares of common
stock after giving effect to the Reverse Stock Split, if
implemented, will depend on the reverse stock split ratio that
is ultimately determined by the board of directors and whether
the Authorized Share Increase is approved. If the Reverse Stock
Split is abandoned by the board of directors, we will also
abandon the reduction in the number of authorized shares.
Effect of
the Reverse Stock Split on Options, Restricted Stock Awards,
Warrants, and Convertible or Exchangeable Securities
Based upon the reverse stock split ratio determined by the board
of directors, proportionate adjustments are generally required
to be made to the per share exercise price and the number of
shares issuable upon the exercise or conversion of all
outstanding options, warrants, convertible or exchangeable
securities entitling the holders to purchase, exchange for, or
convert into, shares of common stock, including the
Series A Preferred Stock, the Warrant and the Senior
Preferred Stock. This would result in approximately the same
aggregate price being required to be paid under such options,
warrants, convertible or exchangeable securities upon exercise,
and approximately the same value of shares of common stock being
delivered upon such exercise, exchange or conversion,
immediately following the Reverse Stock Split as was the case
immediately preceding the Reverse Stock Split. The number of
shares deliverable upon settlement or vesting of restricted
stock awards will be similarly adjusted. The number of shares
reserved for issuance pursuant to these securities will be
reduced proportionately based upon the reverse stock split ratio
determined by the board of directors.
Accounting
Matters
The proposed amendments to our Certificate will not affect the
par value of our common stock per share, which will remain at
$0.01. As a result, as of the Effective Time, the stated capital
attributable to common stock on our balance sheet will be
reduced proportionately based on the reverse stock split ratio
(including a retroactive adjustment of prior periods), and the
additional paid-in capital account will be credited with the
amount by which the stated capital is reduced. Reported per
share net income or loss will be higher because there will be
fewer shares of common stock outstanding.
39
Certain
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Reverse Stock
Split
The following summary describes certain material
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Stock
Split to holders of our common stock.
Unless otherwise specifically indicated herein, this summary
addresses the federal income tax consequences only to a
beneficial owner of our common stock that is a citizen or
individual resident of the United States, a corporation
organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state
thereof or the District of Columbia or otherwise subject to
U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis in
respect of our common stock (a
U.S. holder
). This
summary does not address all of the tax consequences that may be
relevant to any particular investor, including tax
considerations that arise from rules of general application to
all taxpayers or to certain classes of taxpayers or that are
generally assumed to be known by investors. This summary also
does not address the tax consequences to (i) persons that
may be subject to special treatment under U.S. federal
income tax law, such as banks, insurance companies, thrift
institutions, regulated investment companies, real estate
investment trusts, tax-exempt organizations,
U.S. expatriates, persons subject to the alternative
minimum tax, traders in securities that elect to mark to market
and dealers in securities or currencies, (ii) persons that
hold our common stock as part of a position in a
straddle or as part of a hedging,
conversion or other integrated investment
transaction for federal income tax purposes, or
(iii) persons that do not hold our common stock as
capital assets (generally, property held for
investment).
This summary is based on the provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended
(IRC)
, U.S. Treasury
regulations, administrative rulings and judicial authority, all
as in effect as of December 3, 2009. Subsequent
developments in U.S. federal income tax law, including
changes in law or differing interpretations, which may be
applied retroactively, could have a material effect on the
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the Reverse Stock
Split.
Each prospective investor should consult its own tax advisor
regarding the U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign
income and other tax consequences of the Reverse Stock Split.
If a partnership (or other entity classified as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is the beneficial
owner of our common stock, the U.S. federal income tax
treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend
on the status of the partner and the activities of the
partnership. Partnerships that hold our common stock, and
partners in such partnerships, should consult their own tax
advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences
of the Reverse Stock Split.
U.S.
Holders
The Reverse Stock Split should be treated as a recapitalization
for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, except as
described below with respect to cash in lieu of fractional
shares, no gain or loss will be recognized upon the Reverse
Stock Split. Accordingly, the aggregate tax basis in the common
stock received pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split should equal
the aggregate tax basis in the common stock surrendered
(excluding the portion of the tax basis that is allocable to any
fractional share), and the holding period for the common stock
received should include the holding period for the common stock
surrendered.
A U.S. holder who receives cash in lieu of a fractional
share of our common stock pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split
should recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the
difference between the amount of cash received and the
U.S. holders tax basis in the shares of our common
stock surrendered that is allocated to such fractional share of
our common stock. Such capital gain or loss should be long term
capital gain or loss if the U.S. holders holding
period for our common stock surrendered exceeded one year at the
Effective Time. The deductibility of net capital losses by
individuals and corporations is subject to limitations.
U.S. Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding.
Information returns generally will
be required to be filed with the Internal Revenue Service
(
IRS
) with respect to the receipt of cash in lieu of a
fractional share of our common stock pursuant to the Reverse
Stock Split in the case of certain U.S. holders. In
addition, U.S. holders may be subject to a backup
withholding tax (at the current applicable rate of 28%) on the
payment of such cash if they do not provide their taxpayer
identification numbers in the manner required or otherwise fail
to comply with applicable backup withholding tax rules. Backup
withholding is not an
40
additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules may be refunded or allowed as a credit against
the U.S. holders federal income tax liability, if
any, provided the required information is timely furnished to
the IRS.
Non-U.S.
Holders
The discussion in this section is addressed to
non-U.S. holders.
A
non-U.S. holder
is a beneficial owner of our common stock who is a foreign
corporation or a non-resident alien individual.
Generally,
non-U.S. holders
will not recognize gain or loss for U.S. income tax
purposes upon the Reverse Stock Split. In particular, gain or
loss will not be recognized for U.S. federal income tax
purposes with respect to cash received in lieu of a fractional
share provided that (a) such gain or loss is not
effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in
the United States (or, if certain income tax treaties apply, is
not attributable to a
non-U.S. holders
permanent establishment in the United States), (b) with
respect to
non-U.S. holders
who are individuals, such
non-U.S. holders
are present in the United States for less than 183 days in
the taxable year of the Reverse Stock Split and other conditions
are met, and (c) such
non-U.S. holders
comply with certain certification requirements.
U.S. Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Tax.
In general, backup withholding and
information reporting will not apply to a payment of cash in
lieu of a fractional share of our common stock to a
non-U.S. holder
pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split if the
non-U.S. holder
certifies under penalties of perjury that it is a
non-U.S. holder
and the applicable withholding agent does not have actual
knowledge to the contrary. Backup withholding is not an
additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules may be refunded or allowed as a credit against
the
non-U.S. holders
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that
certain required information is timely furnished to the IRS. In
certain circumstances the amount of cash paid to a
non-U.S. holder
in lieu of a fractional share of our common stock, the name and
address of the beneficial owner and the amount, if any, of tax
withheld may be reported to the IRS.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Delaware law and our Certificate, holders of our common
stock will not be entitled to dissenters rights or
appraisal rights with respect to the Reverse Stock Split.
Required
Vote and Recommendation
Under Delaware law and our Certificate, the affirmative vote of
holders of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding
as of the Record Date is required to approve the Reverse Stock
Split. In connection with the Exchange Offer, the holders of
Depositary Shares participating in the Exchange Offer will have
granted their Proxy Instructions with respect to the Reverse
Stock Split in accordance with the procedures set forth in the
Letter of Transmittal and following the Record Date, the shares
of common stock issued in respect of such Depositary Shares will
be subject to an irrevocable proxy granted by the Voting Trustee
in favor of the Reverse Stock Split.
The board unanimously recommends approval of the Reverse
Stock Split.
PREFERRED
STOCK CHANGE
On August 25, 2009, the board of directors adopted
resolutions (1) declaring that an amendment to our
Certificate to eliminate certain voting rights of shares of
common stock, as described below, and (2) directing that a
proposal to approve the Preferred Stock Change be submitted to
holders of our common stock for their approval.
The form of the proposed amendment to our Certificate to effect
the Preferred Stock Change is attached as
Annex C
.
The Preferred Stock Change would eliminate the voting rights of
shares of common stock with respect to any amendment to the
Certificate (including any certificate of designation related to
any series of preferred stock) that relates solely to the terms
of one or more outstanding series of preferred stock, if such
41
series of preferred stock is entitled to vote, either separately
or together as a class with the holders of one or more other
such series, on such amendment. The Preferred Stock Change only
affects the rights of our common stockholders. Shares of common
stock issued and outstanding prior to the Exchange Offer, as
well as shares of common stock issued in exchange for Depositary
Shares in connection with the Exchange Offer, will be affected
by the Preferred Stock Change. Therefore, the number of shares
of common stock that will be affected by the Preferred Stock
Change depends on the number of Depositary Shares that are
tendered and accepted for exchange into common stock in
connection with the Exchange Offer.
The table below shows the approximate number of shares of common
stock that are expected to be affected by the Preferred Stock
Change, depending on the levels of participation in the Exchange
Offer indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Number of Shares of
|
|
|
Common Stock That are
|
Level of Participation
|
|
Expected to be Affected by the
|
in the Exchange Offer(1)
|
|
Preferred Stock Change
|
|
|
(Thousands of shares)
|
|
25%
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
50%
|
|
|
6,708
|
|
66
2
/
3
%
|
|
|
8,944
|
|
75%
|
|
|
10,063
|
|
100%
|
|
|
13,417
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The same assumption and method of calculation set forth in
footnotes (1) and (2) to the first table on
page 24 above apply to the levels of participation in the
table above.
|
Even if the stockholders approve the Preferred Stock Change, the
board of directors reserves the right to elect to abandon the
Preferred Stock Change, if it determines, in its sole
discretion, that the Preferred Stock Change is no longer in the
best interests of Midwest and its stockholders.
Background
and Reasons for the Preferred Stock Change
Under Delaware law, the holders of shares of our common stock
are currently entitled to vote on any amendments to our
Certificate, including any amendment to a certificate of
designation related to a series of preferred stock. In addition,
pursuant to Section 242(b) of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware, under certain amendments, we are
required to seek the approval of a majority of the holders of
each class of stock eligible to vote to make any such changes to
our Certificate. Therefore, we are required to engage in a
lengthy proxy solicitation and incur the costs of holding a
meeting of holders of common stock or soliciting their written
consents to make changes to our Certificate, even if these
changes are only being made to certificates of designation for
preferred stock adopted by the board of directors pursuant to
discretion granted to it in our Certificate.
In addition, we believe that allowing the board of directors the
discretion and flexibility to adopt amendments to our
Certificate (including certificates of designation for a series
of preferred stock) that relate solely to the terms of preferred
stock with only the consent of the board and the holders of such
series of preferred stock is important and consistent with the
board of directors discretion and flexibility to adopt a
certificate of designation and create a new series of preferred
stock without the approval of the holders of common stock.
Accordingly, the board of directors recommends approval of the
Preferred Stock Change.
Effect of
the Preferred Stock Change on Stockholders
Currently, Midwests Certificate provides that the holders
of outstanding shares of common stock have one vote in respect
of each share of common stock held by him or her of record in
the books on Midwest on all matters voted upon by stockholders.
Pursuant to Section 242(b)(1) of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware, any changes to Midwests
Certificate must be approved by a majority of the
outstanding
42
stock entitled to vote thereon, and a majority of the
outstanding stock of each class entitled to vote thereon as a
class.
If the Preferred Stock Change is approved, we would file a
certificate of amendment to our Certificate with the Secretary
of State of the State of Delaware providing that the holders of
common stock will not be entitled to vote with respect to any
amendment to the Certificate (including any certificate of
designation related to any series of preferred stock) that
relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of
preferred stock, if such series of preferred stock is entitled
to vote, either separately or together as a class with the
holders of one or more other such series of affected preferred
stock.
Therefore, holders of common stock would no longer be entitled
to vote on or consent to, and we would not be required to seek
their vote on or consent to, any changes to our Certificate or
certificates of designation that relate solely to the terms of
the preferred stock, so long as the holders of affected
preferred stock are entitled to vote or consent to such changes.
Holders of common stock would retain the power to vote on or
consent to all other matters that they are currently entitled to
vote or consent on, including the election of directors.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Delaware law and our Certificate, holders of our common
stock will not be entitled to dissenters rights or
appraisal rights with respect to the Preferred Stock Change.
Required
Vote and Recommendation
Under Delaware law and our Certificate, the affirmative vote of
holders of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding
as of the Record Date is required to approve the Preferred Stock
Change. In connection with the Exchange Offer, the holders of
Depositary Shares participating in the Exchange Offer will have
granted their Proxy Instructions with respect to the Preferred
Stock Change in accordance with the procedures set forth in the
Letter of Transmittal and following the Record Date, the shares
of common stock issued in respect of such Depositary Shares will
be subject to an irrevocable proxy granted by the Voting Trustee
in favor of the Preferred Stock Change.
The board unanimously recommends approval of the Preferred
Stock Change.
COMMON
STOCK ISSUANCE
Our stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Market.
Rule 5635(d) of the NASDAQ Global Market requires us to
obtain stockholder approval to issue common stock (other than in
a public offering) if (1) the shares of common stock will
have upon issuance voting power equal to 20% or more of the
voting power outstanding before the issuance of the securities
exercisable for common stock, or (2) the number of shares
of common stock to be issued will be upon issuance equal to 20%
or more of the number of shares of common stock outstanding
before the issuance of the securities exercisable for common
stock, in each case if such shares are issued at the less than
the greater of market value or book value. In addition, Nasdaq
Rule 5635(b) also requires stockholder approval of a
transaction that would result in a change of control of Midwest.
Nasdaq generally considers the acquisition by a stockholder of
20% or more of the common stock of a company as a change of
control.
Assuming the Conversion of the Senior Preferred Stock is
effectuated we expect that the issuance of shares of common
stock to the USG would satisfy both of these tests and,
therefore, the Common Stock Issuance must be approved by the
holders of our common stock.
Given the uncertainty in the number of shares of common stock we
will issue upon the consummation of the Conversion, the
Conversion may result in the issuance of 20% or more of the
outstanding common stock of the Company or 20% or more of the
voting power of the Companys outstanding stock in exchange
for the Senior Preferred Stock having a value that is less than
the greater of the book value or market value of the shares, and
could result in the USG acquiring or having the right to acquire
20% or more of the outstanding
43
common stock in the Conversion. Therefore, to comply with
Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5635, the Company is seeking
stockholder approval for the potential issuance of shares of
common stock in the Conversion so that the Company will have
flexibility to enter into and close such a transaction on a
timely basis.
Generally, under published Nasdaq interpretative guidance,
general authorizations by the stockholders for purposes of
Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5635 will be effective only if
limited to transactions which are completed within three months
of the approval. The three month requirement only applies to the
initial issuance of the shares of common stock or other
securities exercisable for or convertible into common stock.
Nasdaq interpretative guidance also requires us to include a
maximum potential discount in stockholder proposals such as this
one. The terms of the Conversion will be determined by the board
of directors and will depend upon discussions with the USG and
prevailing market conditions.
If the issuance of common stock in the Conversion results or
would result in the USG beneficially owning 20% or more of the
common stock following the issuance of common stock, then
stockholder approval of this proposal also will constitute
approval of any change in control or potential change in control
for purposes of Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5635 and no
additional approval will be solicited.
As of the date of this proxy statement, except as otherwise
disclosed in this proxy statement, the Company does not have any
specific plans, arrangements or contracts with any third party,
which alone or when aggregated with subsequent transactions,
would contemplate or require the Company to issue shares of its
common stock or other securities exercisable for or convertible
into common stock in excess of 20% of its outstanding common
stock or voting power and at a price that would be less than the
book or market value of the Companys common stock as of
such date or that would result in a change in control of the
Company. If any material plans, arrangements or contracts
regarding securities issuances subject to this proposal arise
after the date of this proxy statement and prior to the actual
vote on this proposal, the Company will notify its stockholders
and make revised proxy solicitation materials publicly available
in accordance with SEC rules. These materials will include a new
proxy card, if necessary.
The board of directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR the
Common Stock Issuance, for purposes of complying with Nasdaq
Marketplace Rule 5635, to authorize the Company to issue
shares of the Companys common stock in exchange for the
Senior Preferred Stock upon such terms as the board of directors
shall deem to be in the best interests of the Company, provided
that (i) not more than 110 million shares of common
stock may be issued in the exchange, (ii) the Company will
issue for the Senior Preferred Stock a number of shares of
common stock having a dollar value that is not more than
$75 million and not less than $5 million,
(iii) the dollar value per share of common stock used in
determining this exchange ratio will be not less than $0.10 per
share, and (iv) the issuance of shares of common stock
pursuant to the Conversion shall occur not later than the date
three months after the date of the approval of the Conversion by
the stockholders of the Company. In the event that the
Conversion terms fall outside the above parameters, we may be
required to seek a separate stockholder approval under Nasdaq
Marketplace Rule 5635 prior to issuing the shares of common
stock upon conversion of the Senior Preferred Stock.
The issuance and sale of shares of our common stock to the USG
would have a dilutive effect on an existing stockholders
percentage voting power in us. The dilution caused by such
issuances could also lead to a decrease in the market price of
our common stock. In addition, the issuance our common stock to
the USG would give the USG a significant proportionate ownership
of our outstanding common stock. Should the proposed issuance
occur, the USG, as our largest shareholder may have significant
influence over corporate actions requiring stockholder approval,
such as the election of directors, amendment of our charter
documents and the approval of merger or significant asset sale
transaction if the USG has voting rights with respect to such
shares.
If we do not obtain stockholder approval as described in this
proxy statement, we will not complete the Conversion since doing
so would not be in compliance with Nasdaqs Marketplace
Rules, and such non-compliance could result in the delisting of
our common stock from the Nasdaq Global Market. Accordingly, if
we do not obtain stockholder approval, we may not complete the
Preferred Stock Issuance.
44
Even if our stockholders approve the proposed issuance, we can
provide no assurance that such issuance will actually take
place. In addition, we expect that the USG will impose certain
conditions which we must meet before the USG would consider
consummating the proposed transaction. There can be no assurance
that the USG will not exercise its discretion and consummate the
transaction, or that we will meet all of the USGs
conditions therefor.
If the Authorized Share Increase or the Common Stock Issuance is
not approved, we anticipate that the Conversion price for the
Senior Preferred Stock will be reduced and that the dividend
rate on the Senior Preferred Stock will increase.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Delaware law and our Certificate, holders of our common
stock will not be entitled to dissenters rights or
appraisal rights with respect to the Common Stock Issuance.
Required
Vote and Recommendation
Under Rule 5635, the affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the shares of common stock present and entitled to
vote at the special meeting is required to approve the Common
Stock Issuance. In connection with the Exchange Offer, the
holders of Depositary Shares participating in the Exchange Offer
will have granted their Proxy Instructions with respect to the
Common Stock Issuance in accordance with the procedures set
forth in the Letter of Transmittal and following the Record
Date, the shares of common stock issued in respect of such
Depositary Shares will be subject to an irrevocable proxy
granted by the Voting Trustee in favor of the Common Stock
Issuance.
The board unanimously recommends approval of the Common Stock
Issuance.
DIVIDEND
BLOCKER AMENDMENT
On August 25, 2009, the board of directors unanimously
adopted resolutions (1) declaring that an amendment to the
Certificate and the certificate of designation of the
Series A Preferred Stock modifying certain rights of the
Series A Preferred Stock was advisable and
(2) directing that a proposal to approve the Dividend
Blocker Amendment be submitted to our stockholders for their
approval.
The form of the proposed amendment to our Certificate and the
certificate of designation of the Series A Preferred Stock
to reflect the changes imposed by the Dividend Blocker Amendment
is attached to this proxy statement as
Annex D
.
Currently, our Certificate and the certificate of designation of
the Series A Preferred Stock provide that, as to a dividend
payment date, unless Midwest pays or declares and sets apart for
payment full dividends on shares of Series A Preferred
Stock, Midwest may not declare, set apart or pay dividends on,
make any distributions relating to, or redeem, purchase, acquire
or make any liquidation payment relating to, shares of stock of
any class or series that is junior to that Series A
Preferred Stock anytime during the next succeeding dividend
period. In addition, Midwest may not declare, pay or set apart
dividends for the holders of common stock before full dividends
have been declared, paid or set apart on the Series A
Preferred Stock. The certificate of designation of the
Series A Preferred Stock also currently requires Midwest to
declare dividends proportionally on all securities ranking
equally with the Series A Preferred Stock if dividends are
not paid in full on the Series A Preferred Stock. The
certificate of designation provides that Midwest may not issue a
series of preferred stock that is on parity with the
Series A Preferred Stock without the approval of the
holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, if the dividends
on the parity preferred stock will be cumulative. Our
Certificate provides that no dividends shall be paid or declared
on any particular series of preferred stock unless dividends are
paid or declared pro rata on all shares of outstanding preferred
stock which rank equally as to dividends with such particular
series.
45
If approved, the Dividend Blocker Amendment will eliminate the
requirement that:
|
|
|
|
|
full dividends on all outstanding shares of the Series A
Preferred Stock must have been declared and paid or declared and
set aside for the then current dividend period before we may pay
any dividend on, make any distributions relating to, or redeem,
purchase, acquire or make a liquidation payment relating to our
common stock or any other securities junior to the Series A
Preferred Stock;
|
|
|
|
if full dividends are not declared and paid in full on the
Series A Preferred Stock, dividends with respect to all
series of stock ranking equally with the Series A Preferred
Stock will be declared on a proportional basis, such that no
series is paid a greater percentage of its stated dividend than
any other equally ranking series;
|
|
|
|
a series of preferred stock ranking equally with the
Series A Preferred Stock cannot be issued without the
approval of holders of the Depositary Shares if the certificate
of designation for such parity preferred stock will provide that
the dividends on the parity preferred stock will
cumulate; and
|
|
|
|
no dividends shall be paid or declared on any particular series
of preferred stock unless dividends are paid or declared pro
rata on all shares of outstanding preferred stock which rank
equally as to dividends with such particular series.
|
The proposed Dividend Blocker Amendment will not change the
other terms of any series of Series A Preferred Stock
relating to dividends, including the rate at which dividends
accrue or the payment dates for dividends.
Even if the stockholders approve the Dividend Blocker Amendment,
the board of directors reserves its right to elect to abandon
the Dividend Blocker Amendment, if it determines, in its sole
discretion, that the Dividend Blocker Amendment is no longer in
the best interests of Midwest and its stockholders.
Background
and Reasons for the Dividend Blocker Amendment
The Dividend Blocker Amendment is integral to our goal of making
Midwest a better capitalized bank on a TCE and Tier 1
Common basis. The Dividend Blocker Amendment will permit the
board greater flexibility in reinstating the common dividend
without incurring additional dividend expense related to any
Depositary Shares that remain outstanding after the settlement
of the Exchange Offer. We believe this would permit us to
strengthen our common stock and significantly enhance our
ability to maximize the efficiency of Midwests capital
structure going forward. The board believes that reinstating the
common dividend is an important corporate objective, as it will
make our common stock more attractive to a number of
institutional investors, some of which are prohibited from
investing in stock that does not pay a dividend. Making our
common stock more attractive to these investors, as well as
other investors who wish to realize returns on their investment
through dividends, we believe will increase the price and
liquidity of our common stock and strengthen our common stock as
a long-term investment instrument. The Dividend Blocker
Amendment permits this and at the same time saves the expense of
paying dividends on any remaining Depositary Shares.
Under an agreement previously entered into with the USG when it
acquired the Series T Preferred Stock, Midwest is not
permitted to pay dividends on our common stock without the prior
consent of the USG. Upon the Conversion, we believe that we will
be able to pay a $0.01 per share quarterly dividend on our
common stock without the prior approval of the USG. While we
have no current plans to reinstate the common dividend, we
believe that payment of a dividend could potentially enhance the
value of our common stock in the market. The annual cost of a
dividend of $0.01 per share for example, assuming consummation
of all of the Exchange Offer would be $105,000 per quarter (if
no reverse stock split is effected), assuming 100% participation
in the Exchange Offer. However, if the Dividend Blocker
Amendment is not approved, this cost would increase by the
amount of dividends payable in respect of the Series A
Preferred Stock that remains outstanding after the Exchange
Offer.
46
On May 6, 2009, we suspended the payment of dividends on
our Series A Preferred Stock and deferred the payment of
dividends on our Series T Preferred Stock and announced we
would be suspending dividends on our trust preferred securities.
The table below demonstrates the amount of dividends on
Series A Preferred Stock that would be payable annually
assuming the stated levels of participation in the Exchange
Offer if the Dividend Blocker Amendment is not approved.
Potentially paying out such a large amount of preferred
dividends would add significantly to the cost of a $0.01 common
dividend and is inconsistent with our goal of strengthening TCE
and Tier 1 Common.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Series A Preferred
|
|
|
Dividend Payments
|
Level of Participation in
|
|
(Assuming Dividend Blocker
|
the Exchange Offer(1)(7)
|
|
Amendment is not Approved)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
25%(2)
|
|
$
|
2,508.0
|
|
50%(3)
|
|
|
2,229.4
|
|
66
2
/
3
%(4)
|
|
|
1,622.0
|
|
75%(5)
|
|
|
836.0
|
|
100%(6)
|
|
|
-0-
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Does not account for the treatment of fractional shares under
the terms of the Exchange Offer.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Assumes pro rata participation by the Depositary Shares up to an
aggregate liquidation preference of approximately
$10.781 million (25% of the maximum $43.125 million
liquidation preference or liquidation amount of Depositary
Shares subject to the Exchange Offer).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Assumes pro rata participation by the Depositary Shares up to
an aggregate liquidation preference of approximately
$21.563 million (50% of the maximum $43.125 million
liquidation preference or liquidation amount of Depositary
Shares subject to the Exchange Offer).
|
|
(4)
|
|
Assumes pro rata participation by the Depositary Shares up to an
aggregate liquidation preference of approximately
$28.751 million
(66
2
/
3
%
of the maximum $43.125 million liquidation preference or
liquidation amount of Depositary Shares subject to the Exchange
Offer).
|
|
(5)
|
|
Assumes pro rata participation by the Depositary Shares (up to
an aggregate liquidation preference of approximately
$32.343 million (75% of the maximum $43.125 million
liquidation preference or liquidation amount of Depositary
Shares subject to the Exchange Offer).
|
|
(6)
|
|
Assumes pro rata participation by the Depositary Shares
representing the aggregate liquidation preference of Depositary
Shares subject to the Exchange Offer ($43.125 million).
|
|
(7)
|
|
In the case of the 25% participation scenario, annual
Series A Preferred Dividends are determined by calculating
the pro rata non-participation rate for the Depositary Shares
(which is 75%), and multiplying (i) 75% by (ii) the
aggregate liquidation preference of the Depositary Shares
outstanding by (iii) the dividend rate (7.75%). A similar
calculation was used for each of the other participation
scenarios in the table above.
|
In addition, eliminating the clauses in the certificate of
designation for the Series A Preferred Stock and our
Certificate requiring that dividends be declared on a
proportional basis with respect to all equally ranking series of
preferred stock and the requirement that the holders of the
Depositary Shares must approve issues of parity preferred stock
with cumulative dividend rights will also give us more
flexibility in future financings involving preferred stock, as
new series of preferred stock could be issued that give the
holders thereof preferential rights to dividends and without the
approval of the holders of the Depositary Shares. We think this
additional flexibility to effect financings involving preferred
stock is important to our ability to optimize our capital
structure going forward.
We believe that a large majority of the holders of Depositary
Shares will find the economic terms of the Exchange Offer
attractive and will tender their securities. If, as we
anticipate, more than two-thirds of the Depositary Shares are
tendered in the Exchange Offer, and the Dividend Blocker
Amendment is approved in
47
accordance with the terms of the certificate of designation and
the Certificate and Delaware law, only a fraction of our current
holders of Depositary Shares who continue to hold Depositary
Shares after the Exchange Offer will be affected by this change
in the terms of their securities.
To the extent that the Dividend Blocker Amendment provides
further encouragement to holders to tender their Depositary
Shares in the Exchange Offer, this is also positive for Midwest,
as greater participation in the Exchange Offer will lead to an
improved capital structure by increasing our TCE and Tier 1
Common. We believe this will improve public and market
perception of our financial strength.
Effect of
the Dividend Blocker Amendment on Stockholders
Upon effectiveness of the Dividend Blocker Amendment, the
Depositary Shares will no longer be entitled to receive
dividends prior to payment of dividends to holders of common
stock or parity preferred stock. Additionally, new series of
parity preferred stock could be created which would have
cumulative dividend rights.
Depositary Shares that are tendered and accepted for exchange in
the Exchange Offer will be exchanged for shares of common stock
on the settlement date of the Exchange Offer. Therefore,
although holders of these securities will be entitled to vote on
the Preferred Stock Amendments as holders of Depositary Shares
because the Record Date will occur prior to the settlement date,
they will only be affected by the Dividend Blocker Amendment, if
approved, as holders of common stock. Holders of any Depositary
Shares that are not tendered, or that are not accepted for
exchange, in the Exchange Offer will be affected by these
amendments as holders of Depositary Shares.
Approximately 28,116,312 shares of common stock were issued
and outstanding as of the close of business on December 3,
2009. Each of these shares of common stock will be affected by
the Dividend Blocker Amendment. The proposed Dividend Blocker
Amendment would eliminate each of the other restrictions
described above and allow Midwest to declare and pay dividends
on shares of common stock or any other series of junior stock or
make other payments to holders of junior or parity stock without
paying or setting apart for payment any dividends on shares of
Series A Preferred Stock.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Delaware law and our Certificate, holders of our common
stock are not entitled to dissenters rights or appraisal
rights with respect to the Dividend Blocker Amendment.
Required
Vote and Recommendation
Under Delaware law and our Certificate, the affirmative vote of
holders as of the close of business on the Record Date of a
majority of the common stock, voting as a class, are required to
approve the Dividend Blocker Amendment. The Dividend Blocker
Amendment will also have to be approved by holders of two-thirds
of the Depositary Shares. The USG, as holder of the
Series T Preferred Stock, must approve the fourth bullet
point under the Dividend Blocker Amendment.
The board unanimously recommends approval of the Dividend
Blocker Amendment.
DIRECTOR
AMENDMENT
On August 25, 2009, the board of directors unanimously
adopted resolutions (1) declaring that an amendment to the
Certificate and the certificate of designation of the
Series A Preferred Stock, modifying the right of holders of
Series A Preferred Stock to appoint directors if dividends
had not been declared in six quarterly dividend periods was
advisable and (2) directing that a proposal to approve the
Director Amendment be submitted to our stockholders for their
approval.
The form of the proposed amendment to the Certificate and the
certificate of designation of the Series A Preferred Stock
to modify the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock to
reflect the changes imposed by the Director Amendment is
attached to this proxy statement as
Annex E
.
48
Currently, the certificate of designation of the Series A
Preferred Stock provides that, if dividends on the Series A
Preferred Stock remain unpaid for six quarterly dividend
periods, whether or not consecutive, the number of directors on
the board of directors will automatically increase by two and
the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, voting as a single
class together with any other series of preferred stock
similarly affected, will be entitled to elect two directors. The
term of these two directors will end, and the number of
directors on the board of directors will automatically decrease
by two, at such time as all dividends on shares of the
Series A Preferred Stock have been paid in full or declared
and set apart for payment for at least four consecutive
quarterly periods following non-payment of a dividend (and
cumulative dividends have been paid in full with respect to an
equally ranked series of cumulative preferred stock).
If the Director Amendment is approved, the right in the
certificate of designation of holders of Series A Preferred
Stock to elect two directors if dividends have not been paid for
six consecutive quarters, whether or not consecutive, will
terminate.
Even if the stockholders approve the Director Amendment, the
board of directors reserves its right to elect to abandon the
Director Amendment, if it determines, in its sole discretion,
that the Director Amendment is no longer in the best interests
of Midwest and its stockholders.
Background
and Reasons for the Director Amendment
On May 6, 2009, we suspended the payment of dividends on
our Series A Preferred Stock and deferred the payment of
dividends on our Series T Preferred Stock and announced we
would be suspending dividends on our trust preferred securities.
If the Director Amendment is not approved, and dividends are not
paid on Depositary Shares for six quarterly dividend periods
whether or not consecutive, the holders of our Depositary Shares
remaining after the consummation of the Exchange Offer, voting
as a single class, will be able to appoint two additional
directors to the board of directors. The board of directors is
currently composed of eight directors and, given the possibility
that only a fraction of our current holders of Depositary Shares
could remain outstanding upon completion of the Exchange Offer,
the right to appoint two additional directors would afford the
remaining Depositary Shares a disproportionate influence over
our governance and decision-making when compared to their
economic investment.
This is especially true given that we expect the Exchange Offer
to significantly reduce the number of outstanding Depositary
Shares. If the Director Amendment is approved by holders of
two-thirds of the Depositary Shares, we believe it very likely
that the approving holders of the Depositary Shares will have
tendered their Depositary Shares in the Exchange Offer, thereby
reducing the number of outstanding Depositary Shares by at least
two-thirds and perhaps more. The more successful the Exchange
Offer is, the more disproportionate the influence of the
non-tendering holders of Depositary Shares would be, potentially
creating an incentive for holders not to tender their shares in
the Exchange Offer. This incentive is removed if the Director
Amendment is approved.
Effect of
the Director Amendment on Stockholders
Upon the filing of the proposed Director Amendment with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, the Series A
Preferred Stock will no longer have the right to appoint
directors to Midwests board upon Midwests failure to
pay dividends for six quarterly dividend periods.
As noted above, Depositary Shares that are tendered and accepted
for exchange in the Exchange Offer will be exchanged for shares
of common stock on the settlement date of the Exchange Offer.
Therefore, although holders of these securities will be entitled
to vote on the Preferred Stock Amendments as holders of
Depositary Shares because the Record Date will occur prior to
the settlement date, they will only be affected by the Director
Amendment, if approved, as holders of common stock. Holders of
any Depositary Shares that are not tendered, or that are not
accepted for exchange, in the Exchange Offer will be affected by
these amendments as holders of Depositary Shares.
49
Approximately 28,116,312 shares of common stock were issued
and outstanding as of the close of business on December 3,
2009. Each of these shares of common stock will be affected by
the Preferred Stock Amendments because the Director Amendment,
if approved, ensures that management of Midwest remains with a
board of directors elected by the holders of the common stock in
the event that Midwest determines that it is not in the best
interest of stockholders to pay dividends on the Depositary
Shares.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Delaware law and our Certificate, holders of our common
stock are not entitled to dissenters rights or appraisal
rights with respect to the Director Amendment.
Required
Vote and Recommendation
Under Delaware law and our Certificate, the affirmative written
vote of holders as of the close of business on the Record Date
of a majority of the common stock, voting as a class, are
required to approve the Director Amendment. The Director
Amendment will also have to be approved by holders of two-thirds
of the Depositary Shares.
The board unanimously recommends approval of the Director
Amendment.
ADJOURNMENT
PROPOSAL
If at the special meeting the number of shares of the common
stock present or represented and voting in favor of the
Amendments is insufficient to approve any of the Amendments, we
may move to adjourn, postpone or continue the special meeting in
order to enable our board to continue to solicit additional
proxies in favor of the Amendments. In that event the proxies
will then be asked to vote only upon the adjournment,
postponement or continuation proposal and not the Amendments.
We are asking the holders of our common stock to authorize a
vote in favor of adjourning, postponing or continuing the
special meeting and any later adjournments. If the adjournment,
postponement or continuation proposal is approved, we could
adjourn, postpone or continue the special meeting, and any
adjourned session of the special meeting, to use the additional
time to solicit additional proxies in favor of the Amendments,
including the solicitation from stockholders who have previously
voted against such proposals. Among other things, approval of
the adjournment, postponement or continuation proposal could
mean that, even if holders of common stock vote against the
Amendments, we could adjourn, postpone or continue the special
meeting without a vote on the Amendments and seek to convince
stockholders to change their proxies so that the proxies could
vote the Amendments in favor of the Amendments.
The adjournment, postponement or continuation proposal requires
that holders of more of the common stock vote in favor of the
adjournment, postponement or continuation proposal than vote
against the proposal. Accordingly, broker non-votes will have no
effect on the outcome of this proposal. No proxy that is
specifically marked AGAINST the Amendments will be voted in
favor of the adjournment, postponement or continuation proposal,
unless it is specifically marked FOR the Adjournment Proposal.
Our board of directors believes that if the number of shares of
common stock present or represented at the special meeting and
voting in favor of the Amendments is insufficient to approve the
proposals, it is in the best interests of stockholders to enable
the board, for a limited period of time, to continue to seek to
obtain a sufficient number of additional votes to approve the
Amendments.
Required
Vote and Recommendation
Approval of the proposal to vote to adjourn, postpone or
continue the special meeting will require the affirmative vote
of the majority of the votes cast at the special meeting, even
if less than a quorum is represented.
The board unanimously recommends approval of the Adjournment
Proposal.
50
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth certain selected consolidated
financial data at or for the periods indicated. In accordance
with the authoritative guidance for the disposal of long-lived
assets (ASC
360-10-05),
the results of operations and gain on sale of Midwest Bank of
Western Illinois are shown in the Companys statements of
income for 2004 and 2005 as discontinued operations.
The selected financial data as of September 30, 2009 and
2008, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008, is derived from our unaudited financial
statements which, in the opinion of management, contain all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments)
necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and
results of operations for the periods and dates presented. The
data should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. Results
presented for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
results to be expected for the full year or any other future
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts and
ratios
|
|
|
Statement of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
118,063
|
|
|
$
|
143,927
|
|
|
$
|
187,661
|
|
|
$
|
193,869
|
|
|
$
|
159,262
|
|
|
$
|
112,244
|
|
|
$
|
91,962
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
59,964
|
|
|
|
76,793
|
|
|
|
100,695
|
|
|
|
111,237
|
|
|
|
83,980
|
|
|
|
50,797
|
|
|
|
41,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
67,134
|
|
|
|
86,966
|
|
|
|
82,632
|
|
|
|
75,282
|
|
|
|
61,447
|
|
|
|
50,182
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
71,453
|
|
|
|
52,367
|
|
|
|
72,642
|
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
|
|
12,025
|
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
Noninterest income (loss)
|
|
|
14,295
|
|
|
|
(54,328
|
)
|
|
|
(50,596
|
)
|
|
|
15,477
|
|
|
|
14,551
|
|
|
|
(6,245
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
68,378
|
|
|
|
151,671
|
|
|
|
177,074
|
|
|
|
71,395
|
|
|
|
58,640
|
|
|
|
60,319
|
|
|
|
46,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes and discontinued operations
|
|
|
(67,437
|
)
|
|
|
(191,233
|
)
|
|
|
(213,346
|
)
|
|
|
21,823
|
|
|
|
19,168
|
|
|
|
(7,914
|
)
|
|
|
203
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(55,617
|
)
|
|
|
(28,530
|
)
|
|
|
(55,073
|
)
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
(6,325
|
)
|
|
|
(2,869
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(123,054
|
)
|
|
|
(162,702
|
)
|
|
|
(158,273
|
)
|
|
|
18,577
|
|
|
|
17,746
|
|
|
|
(1,589
|
)
|
|
|
3,072
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,533
|
|
|
|
(696
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(123,054
|
)
|
|
|
(162,702
|
)
|
|
|
(158,273
|
)
|
|
|
18,577
|
|
|
|
17,746
|
|
|
|
5,944
|
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and premium accretion
|
|
|
(4,702
|
)
|
|
|
2,506
|
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders(11)
|
|
$
|
(127,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,208
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162,001
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,048
|
|
|
$
|
17,529
|
|
|
|
5,898
|
|
|
$
|
2,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share (basic) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Earnings per share (basic) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Earnings per share (basic)
|
|
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
|
(5.93
|
)
|
|
|
(5.82
|
)
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
Earnings per share (diluted) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
|
(5.93
|
)
|
|
|
(5.82
|
)
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
Earnings per share (diluted) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Earnings per share (diluted)
|
|
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
|
(5.93
|
)
|
|
|
(5.82
|
)
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
Book value at end of period
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
|
|
5.89
|
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
|
|
11.94
|
|
|
|
11.65
|
|
|
|
9.91
|
|
|
|
7.66
|
|
Tangible book value at end of period (non-GAAP measure)(10)
|
|
|
(1.25
|
)
|
|
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
|
|
5.56
|
|
|
|
7.97
|
|
|
|
9.78
|
|
|
|
7.49
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts and
ratios
|
|
|
Selected Financial Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets from continuing operations(1)
|
|
|
(4.50
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.90
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.32
|
)%
|
|
|
0.58
|
%
|
|
|
0.67
|
%
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)%
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
Return on average equity from continuing operations(2)
|
|
|
(61.15
|
)
|
|
|
(58.64
|
)
|
|
|
(46.65
|
)
|
|
|
6.13
|
|
|
|
7.04
|
|
|
|
(0.95
|
)
|
|
|
2.17
|
|
Dividend payout ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
73.04
|
|
|
|
67.95
|
|
|
|
162.38
|
|
|
|
279.59
|
|
Average equity to average assets
|
|
|
7.36
|
|
|
|
10.06
|
|
|
|
9.27
|
|
|
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
9.57
|
|
|
|
7.29
|
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
6.26
|
|
|
|
8.30
|
|
|
|
9.21
|
|
|
|
11.92
|
|
|
|
16.97
|
|
|
|
13.27
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
8.04
|
|
|
|
10.07
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
|
12.97
|
|
|
|
18.07
|
|
|
|
14.65
|
|
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)(3)(4)(5)
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
3.32
|
|
|
|
3.31
|
|
|
|
2.82
|
|
Loan to deposit ratio(5)
|
|
|
96.04
|
|
|
|
99.25
|
|
|
|
104.02
|
|
|
|
100.66
|
|
|
|
99.44
|
|
|
|
88.62
|
|
|
|
73.07
|
|
Net overhead expense to average assets(5)(6)
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
|
|
4.52
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
Efficiency ratio(5)(7)
|
|
|
91.63
|
|
|
|
154.70
|
|
|
|
144.87
|
|
|
|
68.29
|
|
|
|
60.55
|
|
|
|
75.44
|
|
|
|
72.79
|
|
Loan Quality Ratios(5):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans at the end of year
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
Provision for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
3.80
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
2.86
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
Net loans charged off to average total loans
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to total loans at the end of year(8)
|
|
|
7.90
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
2.43
|
|
|
|
1.99
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets(9)
|
|
|
6.06
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
0.78
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
0.43
|
x
|
|
|
0.65
|
x
|
|
|
0.73
|
x
|
|
|
0.54
|
x
|
|
|
0.54
|
x
|
|
|
2.25
|
x
|
|
|
1.74
|
x
|
Rates of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock
Dividends(12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including deposit interest
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(1.42
|
)
|
|
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
Excluding deposit interest
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
(3.82
|
)
|
|
|
(2.76
|
)
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
3,583,377
|
|
|
$
|
3,570,212
|
|
|
$
|
3,692,782
|
|
|
$
|
2,942,046
|
|
|
$
|
2,307,608
|
|
|
$
|
2,236,813
|
|
Total earning assets(5)
|
|
|
3,392,458
|
|
|
|
3,176,629
|
|
|
|
3,195,408
|
|
|
|
3,266,461
|
|
|
|
2,617,894
|
|
|
|
2,126,227
|
|
|
|
1,807,609
|
|
Average assets
|
|
|
3,653,203
|
|
|
|
3,685,013
|
|
|
|
3,661,209
|
|
|
|
3,181,990
|
|
|
|
2,635,138
|
|
|
|
2,305,086
|
|
|
|
2,310,594
|
|
Loans(5)
|
|
|
2,454,101
|
|
|
|
2,494,225
|
|
|
|
2,509,759
|
|
|
|
2,474,327
|
|
|
|
1,946,816
|
|
|
|
1,349,996
|
|
|
|
1,097,299
|
|
Allowance for loan losses(5)
|
|
|
83,506
|
|
|
|
39,428
|
|
|
|
44,432
|
|
|
|
26,748
|
|
|
|
23,229
|
|
|
|
17,760
|
|
|
|
16,217
|
|
Deposits(5)
|
|
|
2,555,189
|
|
|
|
2,513,004
|
|
|
|
2,412,791
|
|
|
|
2,458,148
|
|
|
|
1,957,810
|
|
|
|
1,523,384
|
|
|
|
1,501,646
|
|
Borrowings(5)
|
|
|
777,078
|
|
|
|
829,024
|
|
|
|
817,041
|
|
|
|
821,063
|
|
|
|
652,774
|
|
|
|
538,480
|
|
|
|
320,636
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
207,237
|
|
|
|
305,834
|
|
|
|
375,164
|
|
|
|
287,242
|
|
|
|
216,126
|
|
|
|
137,423
|
|
Tangible stockholders equity(non-GAAP measure)(5)(10)
|
|
|
88,413
|
|
|
|
113,101
|
|
|
|
212,289
|
|
|
|
197,713
|
|
|
|
196,481
|
|
|
|
213,447
|
|
|
|
134,315
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Net income divided by average assets.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Net income divided by average equity.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Net interest income, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, divided by
average earning assets.
|
52
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
The following table reconciles reported net interest income on a
fully tax-equivalent basis for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
$
|
67,134
|
|
|
$
|
86,966
|
|
|
$
|
82,632
|
|
|
$
|
75,282
|
|
|
$
|
61,447
|
|
|
$
|
50,182
|
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment to net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
|
4,286
|
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, fully tax-equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
$
|
69,362
|
|
|
$
|
89,587
|
|
|
$
|
86,244
|
|
|
$
|
79,568
|
|
|
$
|
64,075
|
|
|
$
|
52,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No tax-equivalent adjustment is included for the 2009 periods as
a result of the Companys current tax position.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Reflects continuing operations due to the sale of bank
subsidiary on September 30, 2005.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Noninterest expense less noninterest income, excluding security
gains or losses, divided by average assets.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Noninterest expense excluding amortization of intangible assets
and foreclosed properties expense divided by noninterest income,
excluding security gains or losses, plus net interest income on
a fully tax-equivalent basis.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Includes total nonaccrual, impaired and all other loans
90 days or more past due.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Includes total nonaccrual and all other loans 90 days or
more past due, trouble-debt restructured loans and foreclosed
properties.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Stockholders equity less goodwill, core deposit intangible
and other intangible assets. Management believes that tangible
stockholders equity (non-GAAP measure) is a more useful
measure since it excludes the balances of intangible assets. The
following table reconciles reported stockholders equity to
tangible stockholders equity for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
180,239
|
|
|
$
|
207,237
|
|
|
$
|
305,834
|
|
|
$
|
375,164
|
|
|
$
|
287,242
|
|
|
$
|
216,126
|
|
|
$
|
137,423
|
|
Core deposit intangible and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
|
|
(15,274
|
)
|
|
|
14,683
|
|
|
|
17,044
|
|
|
|
11,273
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
2,217
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
|
|
160,407
|
|
|
|
79,488
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
88,413
|
|
|
$
|
113,011
|
|
|
$
|
212,289
|
|
|
$
|
197,713
|
|
|
$
|
196,481
|
|
|
$
|
213,447
|
|
|
$
|
134,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
Prior periods with earnings were restated as required by the
authoritative guidance for determining whether instruments
granted in share-based payment transactions are participating
securities (ASC 260), which was effective on January 1,
2009, to allocate earnings available to common stockholders to
restricted shares of common stock that are considered
participating securities.
|
|
(12)
|
|
For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to combined
fixed charges and preferred stock dividends, earnings are the
sum of (a) income (loss) before income taxes and
discontinued operations and (b) fixed charges; and fixed
charges are the sum of: (x) interest cost, including
interest on deposits, (y) that portion of rent expense
estimated to be representative of the interest factor and
(z) amortization of issuance costs on trust preferred
securities. The preferred stock dividend amounts represent
pre-tax earnings required to cover dividends on Series A
Preferred Stock and Series T Preferred Stock.
|
53
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following selected unaudited pro forma financial information
has been presented to give effect to and show the pro forma
impact of the Exchange Offer, on Midwests balance sheet as
of September 30, 2009, and also describes the impact of the
Exchange Offer on Midwests earnings for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for
illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily indicate the
financial position or results that would have been realized had
the Exchange Offer been completed as of the dates indicated or
that will be realized in the future when and if the Exchange
Offer is consummated. Additionally, no effect is given to the
other capital enhancement and capital raising objectives of our
Capital Plan, including any possible new equity investments and
any exchange of Series T Preferred Stock for a new series
of convertible preferred stock and the subsequent conversion of
this new class of preferred stock into common stock. Although we
have received non-binding indications of interest from potential
investors concerning potential equity investments, we have no
binding commitments from these firms at this time. Additionally,
although the USG has delivered to us a letter expressing its
willingness to consent to an exchange of its Series T
Preferred Stock, the definitive terms of such a transaction with
the USG have not been finalized. Accordingly, no assurances can
be made that possible new equity investments, the exchange
transaction with the USG or any other component of our Capital
Plan will be completed. The selected unaudited pro forma
financial information has been derived from, and should be read
in conjunction with, the summary historical consolidated
financial information included elsewhere in this document and
Midwests historical consolidated financial statements and
included herein beginning on
page F-1.
Unaudited
Pro Forma Balance Sheets
The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheets of Midwest
as of September 30, 2009 have been presented as if the
Exchange Offer had been completed on September 30, 2009. We
have shown the pro forma impact of a High Participation
Scenario and a Low Participation Scenario
prepared using the assumptions set forth below, although we can
offer no assurance that the levels of participation in the
Exchange Offer under the High Participation Scenario or Low
Participation Scenario will be realized.
The High Participation Scenario assumes the exchange
of 80% of the outstanding Depositary Shares for common stock at
an assumed value assigned to each Depositary Share of $2.80 and
a Relevant Price of $0.36.
The Low Participation Scenario assumes the exchange
of 50% of the outstanding Depositary Shares into common stock at
an assumed value assigned to each Depositary Share of $2.80 and
a Relevant Price of $0.36.
The pro forma impact to stockholders equity, additional
paid-in capital and retained earnings generated by the Exchange
Offer in both the High Participation Scenario and the Low
Participation Scenario were determined based on $0.36, the
closing price of Midwests common stock on December 1,
2009 on the Nasdaq. The actual determination with respect to
shares issued in the Exchange Offer will be made using the
closing price of Midwests common stock on the Nasdaq on
the day the investors and Midwest are legally committed to the
Exchange Offer (Commitment Date).
54
HIGH
PARTICIPATION SCENARIO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Shares for
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Stock(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
32,278
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,278
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
295,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
327,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,440
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
2,454,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,454,101
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(83,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
2,370,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,370,595
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
40,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,589
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
20,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,980
|
|
Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
49,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
330,901
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
330,901
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
2,224,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,224,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
2,555,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,555,189
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
31,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,363,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,363,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
107
|
(2)
|
|
|
408
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
385,219
|
|
|
|
2,929
|
|
|
|
388,148
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(191,726
|
)
|
|
|
(3,036
|
)(3)
|
|
|
(194,762
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(4,032
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,032
|
)
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents proposed partial exchange of outstanding Depositary
Shares.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents par value of 10,733,333 shares of common stock
at $.01 par value. Exchange results in no net proceeds to
the Company.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents premium over the closing price of Depositary Shares
on December 1, 2009.
|
56
LOW
PARTICIPATION SCENARIO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Shares for
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Stock(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
32,278
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,278
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
295,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
327,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,440
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
2,454,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,454,101
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(83,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
2,370,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,370,595
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
40,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,589
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
20,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,980
|
|
Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
49,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
330,901
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
330,901
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
2,224,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,224,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
2,555,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,555,189
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
31,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,363,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,363,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
67
|
(2)
|
|
|
368
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
385,219
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
387,050
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(191,726
|
)
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)(3)
|
|
|
(193,624
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(4,032
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,032
|
)
|
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents partial exchange of outstanding Depositary Shares.
|
57
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents par value of 6,708,333 shares of common stock at
$.01 par value. Exchange results in no net proceeds to the
Company.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents premium over the closing price of Depositary Shares
on December 1, 2009.
|
Pro Forma
Earnings Implications
The following presents the pro forma impact of the Exchange
Offer on certain statement of income items and earnings per
share (EPS) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 and the quarter ended September 30,
2009 as if the Exchange Offer had been completed on
January 1, 2008. We have calculated the pro forma
information below by (1) eliminating all of the actual
dividends paid to holders of Preferred Stock in 2008 and in the
first three quarters of 2009, and (2) assuming that
the new shares of Common Stock issuable in the Exchange Offer
were issued on January 1, 2008. We have shown the pro forma
impact of a High Participation Scenario and a
Low Participation Scenario using the assumptions set
forth below, although we can offer no assurance that the levels
of participation in the Exchange Offer under the High
Participation Scenario or Low Participation Scenario will be
realized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(158,273
|
)
|
|
$
|
(157,357
|
)(1)
|
|
$
|
(157,357
|
)(1)
|
|
$
|
(123,054
|
)
|
|
$
|
(123,054
|
)(1)
|
|
$
|
(123,054
|
)(1)
|
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
386
|
(2)
|
|
|
386
|
(2)
|
|
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
3,867
|
(2)
|
|
|
3,867
|
(2)
|
Series A conversion premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,036
|
(3)
|
|
|
1,898
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(162,001
|
)
|
|
$
|
(160,779
|
)
|
|
$
|
(159,641
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
(126,921
|
)
|
|
$
|
(126,921
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
27,854
|
|
|
|
38,587
|
(4)
|
|
|
34,562
|
(5)
|
|
|
27,936
|
|
|
|
38,669
|
(4)
|
|
|
34,644
|
(5)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding dilutive
|
|
|
27,854
|
|
|
|
38,587
|
(4)
|
|
|
34,562
|
(5)
|
|
|
27,936
|
|
|
|
38,669
|
(4)
|
|
|
34,644
|
(5)
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(5.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.62
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.66
|
)
|
Dilutive
|
|
|
(5.82
|
)
|
|
|
(4.17
|
)
|
|
|
(4.62
|
)
|
|
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
|
(3.28
|
)
|
|
|
(3.66
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes imputed earnings of $916,000 for 2008 based on an
average Fed Funds rate of 1.94% for the period prior to actual
date of Series T Preferred Stock proceeds.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Pro forma assumes no preferred dividend on Series A
Preferred Stock.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents estimated premium on exchange of Series A
Preferred Stock, payable as a special stock dividend.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Increase in common shares outstanding due to
10,733,333 shares as a result of Exchange Offer.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Increase in common shares outstanding due to
6,708,333 shares as a result of Exchange Offer.
|
58
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth the carrying amount of our
capitalization, as of September 30, 2009, on an actual
basis and on a pro forma basis to reflect: (i) completion
of the Exchange Offer under the High Participation Scenario (as
defined under Unaudited Pro Forma Financial
Information above) and (ii) completion of the
Exchange Offer under the Low Participation Scenario (as defined
under Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information
above), although we can offer no assurance that the levels of
participation in the Exchange Offer under the High Participation
Scenario or the Low Participation Scenario will be realized.
Additionally, no effect is given to the other capital
enhancement and capital raising objectives of our Capital Plan,
including any possible new equity investments and any exchange
of Series T Preferred Stock for a new series of convertible
preferred stock and the subsequent conversion of this new class
of preferred stock into Common Stock. Although we have received
non-binding indications of interest from potential investors
concerning potential equity investments, we have no binding
commitments from these firms at this time. Additionally,
although the USG has delivered to us a letter expressing its
willingness to consent to an exchange of its Series T
Preferred Stock, the definitive terms of such a transaction with
the USG have not yet been finalized. Accordingly, no assurances
can be made that possible new equity investments, the exchange
transaction with the USG or any other component of our Capital
Plan will be completed. This table should be read in conjunction
with the information set forth under Selected Financial
Data and Unaudited Pro Forma Financial
Information and our consolidated unaudited financial
statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
included elsewhere in this prospectus beginning on
page F-1.
HIGH
PARTICIPATION SCENARIO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Shares for
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Stock(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
130,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
107
|
(2)
|
|
|
408
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
385,219
|
|
|
|
2,929
|
(2)
|
|
|
388,148
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(191,726
|
)
|
|
|
(3,036
|
)(3)
|
|
|
(194,762
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(4,032
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,032
|
)
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
311,067
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
311,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents proposed partial exchange of outstanding Depositary
Shares,
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents par value of 10,733,333 shares of common stock
at $.01 par value. Exchange results in no net proceeds to
the Company.
|
59
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents premium over the closing price of Depositary Shares
on December 1, 2009.
|
LOW
PARTICIPATION SCENARIO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Shares for
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Stock(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
130,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Common stock
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
67
|
(2)
|
|
|
368
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
385,219
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
(2)
|
|
|
387,050
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(191,726
|
)
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)(3)
|
|
|
(193,624
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(4,032
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,032
|
)
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
311,067
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
311,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents proposed partial exchange of outstanding Depositary
Shares.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents par value of 6,708,333 shares of common stock at
$.01 par value. Exchange results in no net proceeds to the
Company.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents premium over the closing price of Depositary Shares
on December 1, 2009.
|
60
REGULATORY
CAPITAL RATIOS
Midwest is subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by
the Federal Reserve. Capital adequacy is measured, in part,
based on two risk-based capital ratios, the Tier 1 Capital
and Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2 Capital) ratios.
Tier 1 Capital consists of core capital, while Total
Capital also includes supplementary capital items such as
subordinated debt and loan loss reserves. Both measures of
capital adequacy are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted
assets.
Midwests risk-weighted assets are principally derived from
application of the risk-based capital guidelines related to the
measurement of credit risk, under which on-balance sheet assets
and the credit equivalent amount of certain off-balance sheet
exposures (such as financial guarantees, unfunded lending
commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives) are assigned to
one of several prescribed risk weight categories based upon the
perceived credit risk associated with the obligor, or if
relevant, the guarantor, the nature of the collateral, or
external credit ratings. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a
measure for market risk on covered trading account positions,
and all foreign exchange and commodity positions whether or not
carried in the trading account. Excluded from risk-weighted
assets are any assets, such as goodwill and deferred tax assets,
to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital.
Midwest is also subject to a Leverage Ratio requirement, a
non-risk-based measure of capital adequacy, which is defined as
Tier 1 Capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted
average assets.
To be adequately-capitalized under federal bank
regulatory agency definitions, a banking organization must have
a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of at least 4%, a Total Capital
Ratio of at least 8%, a Leverage Ratio of at least 3% (or 4% if
the bank holding company is not a 1 rated
institution), and not be subject to an Federal Reserve directive
to maintain higher capital levels. As noted in the following
table, Midwest was not adequately-capitalized under
federal bank regulatory agency definitions at September 30,
2009 (due to its total risk-based capital ratio) and was
adequately capitalized at December 31, 2008.
Midwest
Regulatory Capital Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
Dec. 31, 2008
|
|
Capital Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage
|
|
|
4.26
|
%
|
|
|
6.90
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
|
|
8.30
|
%
|
Total Capital
|
|
|
7.95
|
%
|
|
|
10.07
|
%
|
Tier 1 Common
|
|
|
(1.24
|
)%
|
|
|
1.98
|
%
|
61
The following table sets forth Midwests regulatory capital
ratios, as of September 30, 2009, on an as
reported basis, as well as the basis point impacts to the
ratios under pro forma bases. The pro forma bases present:
(i) completion of the Exchange Offer under the Low
Participation Scenario (as defined under Unaudited Pro
Forma Financial Information above) and
(ii) completion of the Exchange Offer under the High
Participation Scenario (as defined under Unaudited Pro
Forma Financial Information above). This table should be
read in conjunction with the information set forth under
Selected Financial Data and Unaudited Pro
Forma Financial Information and our consolidated unaudited
financial statements for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009 included elsewhere in this prospectus
beginning on
page F-1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Offer
|
|
Pro Forma for
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
the Exchange
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
(Low)
|
|
Offer (High)
|
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
|
Capital Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
Total Capital
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
Tier 1 Common
|
|
|
(1.24
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
Tangible
Common Equity (TCE) and Tier 1 Common
Midwests management believes TCE and Tier 1 Common
are useful because they are measures utilized by its regulators
and market analysts in evaluating a companys financial
condition and capital strength.
TCE, as defined by the Company, represents common equity less
goodwill and intangible assets. Other companies may calculate
TCE in a manner different from Midwest. Midwests TCE was
$(35.0) million at September 30, 2009 and
$89.5 million at December 31, 2008.
The Companys TCE Ratio (TCE divided by tangible assets
(see below Components of Capital Under Regulatory
Guidelines)) was (1.01)% at September 30, 2009, and
2.58% at December 31, 2008, respectively.
Also, in conjunction with the conclusion of the Supervisory
Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), banking regulators have
developed a new measure of capital called Tier 1 Common
defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements
including qualified perpetual preferred stock, qualifying
minority interest in subsidiaries and qualifying trust preferred
securities.
The Companys Tier 1 Common Ratio (Tier 1 Common
divided by risk-weighted assets) was (1.24)% at
September 30, 2009, and 1.98% at December 31, 2008,
respectively.
62
Non-GAAP Reconciliation
of Certain Ratios to Stockholders Equity
TCE and related ratios are non-GAAP measures. A reconciliation
of Midwests total stockholders equity to TCE is
included in the table below.
HIGH
PARTICIPATION SCENARIO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Shares for
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Stock(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
180,239
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
180,239
|
|
Preferred equity
|
|
|
(123,436
|
)
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
(88,936
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity
|
|
|
56,803
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
91,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
(35,023
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,500
|
|
|
$
|
(523
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$
|
2.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.35
|
|
Tangible book value per common share
|
|
|
(1.25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
$
|
3,452,304
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,452,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common stockholders equity/tangible assets
|
|
|
(1.01
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents proposed partial exchange of outstanding Depositary
Shares.
|
63
LOW
PARTICIPATION SCENARIO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Shares for
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Stock(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
180,239
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
180,239
|
|
Preferred equity
|
|
|
(123,436
|
)
|
|
|
21,563
|
|
|
|
(101,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity
|
|
|
56,803
|
|
|
|
21,563
|
|
|
|
78,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
(35,023
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,563
|
|
|
$
|
(13,461
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$
|
2.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.25
|
|
Tangible book value per common share
|
|
|
(1.25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets
|
|
$
|
3,452,304
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,452,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common stockholders equity/tangible assets
|
|
|
(1.01
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents proposed partial exchange of outstanding Depositary
Shares.
|
64
Components
of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines
Tier 1 Common and related ratios are non-GAAP measures. A
reconciliation of Midwests common stockholders
equity to Tier 1 Common is included in the tables below.
HIGH
PARTICIPATION SCENARIO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Shares for
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Stock(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Tier 1 Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
56,803
|
|
|
$
|
34,500
|
|
|
$
|
91,303
|
|
Less: Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
Less: Goodwill
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
Less: Disallowed tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Prior service cost and decrease in projected benefit
obligation
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
Plus: Unrealized losses on securities
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
Less: Unrealized losses on equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tier 1 Common
|
|
|
(30,991
|
)
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualifying perpetual preferred securities
|
|
|
123,436
|
|
|
|
(34,500
|
)
|
|
|
88,936
|
|
Qualifying trust preferred securities
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
151,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
83,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,506
|
|
Reserve for unfunded commitments
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
Disallowed allowance
|
|
|
(53,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,644
|
)
|
Qualifying subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Unrealized gains on equity securities
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
198,903
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
198,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents proposed partial exchange of outstanding Depositary
Shares.
|
65
LOW
PARTICIPATION SCENARIO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Shares for
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Stock(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Tier 1 Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
56,803
|
|
|
$
|
21,563
|
|
|
$
|
78,366
|
|
Less: Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
Less: Goodwill
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
Less: Disallowed tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Prior service cost and decrease in projected benefit
obligation
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
Plus: Unrealized losses on securities
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
Less: Unrealized losses on equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tier 1 Common
|
|
|
(30,991
|
)
|
|
|
21,563
|
|
|
|
(9,429
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualifying perpetual preferred securities
|
|
|
123,436
|
|
|
|
(21,563
|
)
|
|
|
101,874
|
|
Qualifying trust preferred securities
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
151,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
83,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,506
|
|
Reserve for unfunded commitments
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
Disallowed allowance
|
|
|
(53,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,644
|
)
|
Qualifying subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Unrealized gains on equity securities
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
198,903
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
198,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents proposed partial exchange of outstanding Depositary
Shares.
|
66
Ratios of
Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low Participation
|
|
|
High Participation
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro-Forma
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro-Forma
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro-Forma
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro-Forma
|
|
|
(Loss) income before taxes and discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
(213,346
|
)
|
|
$
|
(211,820
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67,437
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67,437
|
)
|
|
$
|
(213,346
|
)
|
|
$
|
(211,820
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67,437
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67,437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and amortization of capitalized costs of
indebtedness
|
|
$
|
100,695
|
|
|
$
|
100,695
|
|
|
$
|
59,964
|
|
|
$
|
59,964
|
|
|
$
|
100,695
|
|
|
$
|
100,695
|
|
|
$
|
59,694
|
|
|
$
|
59,964
|
|
Estimated interest within rental expense
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
5,025
|
|
|
|
3,075
|
|
|
|
2,577
|
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
5,025
|
|
|
|
4,606
|
|
|
|
2,577
|
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed charges
|
|
$
|
106,559
|
|
|
$
|
104,609
|
|
|
$
|
63,160
|
|
|
$
|
62,702
|
|
|
$
|
106,559
|
|
|
$
|
106,140
|
|
|
$
|
63,160
|
|
|
$
|
62,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(5,025
|
)
|
|
|
(3,075
|
)
|
|
|
(2,577
|
)
|
|
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
|
(5,025
|
)
|
|
|
(4,606
|
)
|
|
|
(2,577
|
)
|
|
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings
|
|
$
|
(111,812
|
)
|
|
$
|
(110,286
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,854
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,854
|
)
|
|
$
|
(111,812
|
)
|
|
$
|
(110,286
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,854
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,854
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed charges
|
|
|
106,559
|
|
|
|
104,609
|
|
|
|
63,160
|
|
|
|
62,702
|
|
|
|
106,559
|
|
|
|
106,140
|
|
|
|
63,160
|
|
|
|
62,702
|
|
Interest expense on deposits
|
|
|
66,025
|
|
|
|
66,025
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
66,025
|
|
|
|
66,025
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed charges excluding deposit interest
|
|
$
|
40,534
|
|
|
$
|
38,584
|
|
|
$
|
25,880
|
|
|
$
|
25,422
|
|
|
$
|
40,534
|
|
|
$
|
40,115
|
|
|
$
|
25,880
|
|
|
$
|
25,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock
dividends:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including deposit interest
|
|
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
|
(1.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
Excluding deposit interest
|
|
|
(2.76
|
)
|
|
|
(2.86
|
)
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
(2.76
|
)
|
|
|
(2.75
|
)
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
67
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
The Companys principal business is conducted by the Bank
which provides of a full range of community-based financial
services, including commercial and retail banking. The
profitability of the Companys operations depends primarily
on its net interest income, provision for loan losses,
noninterest income, noninterest expenses, and income taxes. Net
interest income is the difference between the income the Company
receives on its loan and securities portfolios and its cost of
funds, which consists of interest paid on deposits and
borrowings. The provision for loan losses reflects the cost of
credit risk in the Companys loan portfolio. Noninterest
income consists of service charges on deposit accounts,
securities gains or losses or impairments, net trading profits
or losses, gains or losses on sales of loans, insurance and
brokerage commissions, trust income, increase in cash surrender
value of life insurance, gains on sale of property and
extinguishment of debt, and other noninterest income.
Noninterest expenses include salaries and employee benefits,
occupancy and equipment expenses, professional services,
marketing expenses, amortization of intangible assets, goodwill
impairment, loss on extinguishment of debt, merger-related
expenses, and other noninterest expenses. The Company is subject
to state and federal income taxes.
Net interest income is dependent on the amounts of and yields on
interest-earning assets as compared to the amounts of and rates
on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is
sensitive to changes in market interest rates and is dependent
on the Companys asset/liability management procedures to
react appropriately to such changes. The provision for loan
losses is based upon managements assessment of the
collectibility of the loan portfolio under current economic
conditions. Noninterest expenses are influenced by the growth of
operations. Growth in the number of account relationships
directly affects such expenses as data processing costs,
supplies, postage, and other miscellaneous expenses. The
provision for income taxes is affected by tax law and
regulation, accounting principles and policies, and income tax
strategies. See Note 2 and Note 22 of the Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 included in this proxy statement
beginning on
page F-27.
The following discussion and analysis is intended as a review of
significant factors affecting the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company for the periods indicated.
The discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto and the
Selected Consolidated Financial Data presented herein. In
addition to historical information, the following
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements
that involve risks and uncertainties. The Companys actual
results could differ significantly from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors
discussed herein.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. By their nature,
changes in these assumptions and estimates could significantly
affect the Companys financial position or results of
operations. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Discussed below are those critical accounting policies that are
of particular significance to the Company.
Allowance for Loan Losses:
The allowance for
loan losses represents managements estimate of probable
credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Estimating the
amount of the allowance for loan losses requires significant
judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and
timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans,
estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on
historical loss experience, and consideration of current
economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible
to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the
largest asset type on the consolidated balance sheet. Loan
losses are charged off against the allowance, while recoveries
of amounts previously charged off are
68
credited to the allowance. A provision for loan losses is
charged to operations based on managements periodic
evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, as well as other
pertinent factors.
The Companys methodology for determining the allowance for
loan losses represents an estimation performed pursuant to the
authoritative guidance for contingencies (ASC 450) and loan
impairments (ASC
310-10-35).
The allowance reflects expected losses resulting from analyses
developed through specific credit allocations for individual
loans and historical loss experience for each loan category. The
specific credit allocations are based on regular analyses of all
loans over $300,000 where the internal credit rating is at or
below a predetermined classification. These analyses involve a
high degree of judgment in estimating the amount of loss
associated with specific loans, including estimating the amount
and timing of future cash flows and collateral values. The
allowance for loan losses also includes consideration of
concentrations and changes in portfolio mix and volume and other
qualitative factors. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an
integral part of their examinations, may require the Company to
make additions to the allowance based on their judgment about
information available to them at the time of their examinations.
There are many factors affecting the allowance for loan losses;
some are quantitative while others require qualitative judgment.
The process for determining the allowance (which management
believes adequately considers all of the potential factors which
potentially result in credit losses) includes subjective
elements and, therefore, may be susceptible to significant
change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management
estimates, additional provisions for credit losses could be
required that could adversely affect the Companys earnings
or financial position in future periods.
A loan is impaired when full payment of all principal and
interest under the original loan terms is not expected.
Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of
similar nature such as residential mortgage and consumer loans
and on an individual basis for other loans. If a loan is
impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the
loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future
cash flows using the loans existing rate or at the fair
value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the
collateral.
Income Taxes:
The Company recognizes expense
for federal and state income taxes currently payable as well as
for deferred federal and state taxes for estimated future tax
effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets
and liabilities and amounts reported in the consolidated balance
sheets, as well as loss carryforwards and tax credit
carryforwards. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent
upon generating sufficient taxable income in either the
carryforward or carryback periods to cover net operating losses
generated by the reversal of temporary differences. A valuation
allowance is provided by way of a charge to income tax expense
if it is determined that it is not more likely than not that
some or all of the deferred tax asset will be realized. If
different assumptions and conditions were to prevail, the
valuation allowance may not be adequate to absorb unrealized
deferred taxes and the amount of income taxes payable may need
to be adjusted by way of a charge or credit to expense.
Furthermore, income tax returns are subject to audit by the IRS
and state taxing authorities. Income tax expense for current and
prior periods is subject to adjustment based upon the outcome of
such audits. The Company believes it has adequately accrued for
all probable income taxes payable. Accrual of income taxes
payable and valuation allowances against deferred tax assets are
estimates subject to change based upon the outcome of future
events.
The Company has entered into tax allocation agreements with its
subsidiary entities included in the consolidated US federal and
unitary and combined state income tax returns. These agreements
govern the timing and amount of income tax payments required by
the various entities.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) released authoritative guidance for
uncertainty in income taxes (ASC 740), which clarifies the
accounting and reporting for uncertainties in the application of
income tax laws, providing a comprehensive model for the
financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and
disclosure of income tax positions taken or expected to be taken
in income tax returns. The Companys adoption of this
guidance on January 1, 2007 did not have a material impact
on the Companys consolidated financial position and
results of operations. See Note 22 Income Taxes
of the Notes to the consolidated financial statements for more
details.
69
Evaluation of Securities for
Impairment:
Securities are classified as
held-to-maturity
when the Company has the ability and intent to hold those
securities to maturity. Accordingly, they are stated at cost
adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of
discounts. Securities are classified as
available-for-sale
when the Company may decide to sell those securities due to
changes in market interest rates, liquidity needs, changes in
yields or alternative investments, and for other reasons. They
are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net
of taxes, reported in other comprehensive income (loss).
Interest income is reported net of amortization of premium and
accretion of discount. Realized gains and losses on the
disposition of securities
available-for-sale
are based on the net proceeds and the adjusted carrying amounts
of the securities sold, using the specific identification
method. Declines in the fair value of
held-to-maturity
and
available-for-sale
securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than
temporary are recognized in earnings as realized losses. In
estimating other than temporary losses, management considers
(1) the length of time and extent to which the fair value
has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and
ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer
for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated
recovery in fair value.
Goodwill Impairment:
The Company operates in
one operating segment as defined in the authoritative guidance
for segment reporting (ASC 280), community banking, currently
does not have a system to report internally its operating income
below that level and does not provide such information to its
CEO, the companys chief operating decision maker. For this
reason, the Company performs its goodwill impairment test as one
reporting unit at the consolidated Company level. Consistent
with our policy, we conducted annual impairment testing for
goodwill in the third quarter ended September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008. Based on the Companys review in
connection with the 2009 annual test, the Company determined
that the $78.9 million goodwill recorded on the
September 30, 2009 balance sheet was not impaired. Based on
the Companys prior year annual test performed at
September 30, 2008, the Company had determined goodwill was
impaired and recorded an $80.0 million impairment to reduce
the goodwill balance to $78.9 million. A summary of the
methodologies employed to conduct the Companys testing at
September 30, 2009, the underlying assumptions used, and
how the methodologies employed compared with those used in the
prior year test is set forth under Financial
Condition at September 30, 2009 Goodwill.
A similar summary and discussion of the Companys testing
at September 30, 2008 is set forth below.
For the 2008 annual impairment test, the methods for estimating
the value of the Company under Step 1 of the goodwill impairment
test included a weighted average of the discounted cash flow
method, the guideline company method and the guideline
transaction method. The discounted cash flow method computes the
discounted value of both projected annual cash flows and an
assumed terminal value. The guideline company and guideline
transaction methods use publicly available information on
selected peer banks and recent sales of controlling interests in
comparable banks to estimate the fair value of the Company. This
process allows us to determine an appropriate implied control
premium which serves to adjust the Companys market
capitalization to an estimated fair value utilized in connection
with our annual goodwill impairment evaluation.
In Step 2 of the test, the Company estimated the fair value of
assets and liabilities in the same manner as if a purchase of
the reporting unit was taking place from a market participant
perspective, which includes estimating the fair value of other
intangibles. The fair value estimation methodology selected for
our most significant assets and liabilities was based on our
observations and knowledge of methodologies typically and
currently utilized by market participants, the structure and
characteristics of the asset and liability in terms of cash
flows and collateral, and the availability and reliability of
significant inputs required for a selected methodology and
comparative data to evaluate the outcomes. Specifically, we
selected the income approach for loans, retail certificates of
deposit, core deposit intangibles and the market approach for
branch properties. The income approach was deemed appropriate
for the assets and liabilities noted above due to the limited
current comparable market transaction data available. The market
approach was deemed appropriate for the branch properties due to
the nature of the underlying real and personal property. The
fair value of borrowings was estimated to be book value since
borrowing rates approximated market rates at that time.
In Step 1 the Company used the discounted cash flow method under
the income approach weighted at 50%, the guideline public
company method weighted at 30% and the guideline transaction
method weighted at 20%. The weightings were determined by
professional judgment based upon the relative strengths of each
of
70
the three methods as it relates to the quality and quantity of
available and verifiable information. In Step 2 we did not use
multiple approaches to estimate the fair value of any given
asset or liability category; therefore, no weightings were
incorporated into our methodology in this step.
Material assumptions used in the fair value estimate include
projected earnings, effective tax rates, market discount rates,
terminal residual values, composition of market comparables and
the weighting of computational method results in Step 1 testing.
Changes in any of these assumptions can have a material effect
on the impairment estimate. In particular, changes in projected
earnings and market bank stock levels have a material effect on
the Step 1 estimated fair values. As a financial institution,
the fair value estimates in Step 2 are sensitive to changes in
market interest rates, especially on the values of longer term
assets and liabilities. Gross loans represented 68% of total
assets as of September 30, 2008. A 1% change in estimated
loan fair values would have created a $25 million or 14%
change in the total fair value estimate of the Company as of the
September 30, 2008 testing date. Core deposit intangible
fair values increase with increases in market interest rates.
The fair value of long term borrowings with fixed interest rates
increases as market rates decline and decreases as market rates
increase.
Prior year assumptions and methodologies used for goodwill
impairment testing relied upon the Companys market
capitalization adjusted for estimated control premiums. In the
September 2007 annual test, the Companys market
capitalization was 22% larger than its book equity before
factoring in an implied control premium. Due to the downward
pressure on bank earnings and bank stock prices caused by the
difficult economy, the 2008 annual goodwill impairment test was
the first time Step 1 of our goodwill impairment test indicated
a possible impairment; as a consequence Step 2 detailed testing
was determined to be necessary.
Accounting
Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
established the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification
tm
(Codification or ASC) as the single
source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be
applied by nongovernmental entities (ASC 105). Rules and
interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are
also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The
Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and
reporting standards. All other
non-grandfathered,
non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification
will become
non-authoritative.
Following the Codification, the FASB will not issue new
standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or
Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue
Accounting Standards Updates (ASU), which will serve
to update the Codification, provide background information about
the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the
changes to the Codification.
GAAP is not intended to be changed as a result of the
FASBs Codification project, but it will change the way the
guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes
will have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP
in their financial statements and in their accounting policies
for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has
implemented the Codification in this proxy statement by
providing references to the Codification topics.
In September 2006, the SEC issued guidance in the process of
quantifying financial statement misstatements
(ASC 250-10-S99-2).
This guidance requires registrants to quantify an error under
two methods: (1) quantify the misstatement based on the
amount of the error originating in the current-year income
statement (Rollover Approach) and (2) quantify
the misstatement based on the effects of correcting the
misstatement existing in the balance sheet at the end of the
current-year irrespective of the misstatements year(s)
origination (Iron Curtain Approach). Consequently, a
registrants financial statements would require adjustment
when either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that
is material, after considering all relevant quantitative and
qualitative factors. This guidance was effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years ending after
November 15, 2006. The application of this guidance as of
January 1, 2007 did not have any impact on the
Companys results of operations or financial position.
In December 2007, the FASB reversed the authoritative guidance
for business combinations (ASC 805), which modifies the
accounting for business combinations and requires, with limited
exceptions, the acquirer in
71
a business combination to recognize all of the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in the
acquire at the acquisition-date, at fair value. This guidance
also requires certain contingent assets and liabilities acquired
as well as contingent consideration to be recognized at fair
value. In addition, the statement requires payments to third
parties for consulting, legal, audit, and similar services
associated with an acquisition to be recognized as expenses when
incurred rather than capitalized as part of the cost of the
acquisition. This guidance is effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and early adoption
is not permitted. The adoption of this guidance on
January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations or consolidated financial
position.
The Company adopted the authoritative guidance for fair value
measurements (ASC 820) on January 1, 2008, which
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. This guidance applies to other ASC topics that
require or permit fair value measurements. Accordingly, this
guidance does not require any new financial assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value. In February 2008, the
FASB delayed the effective dates of this guidance for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring
basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008. In October 2008, the FASB amended this
guidance, which clarifies the application of fair value
measurements in an inactive market and provides an illustrative
example to demonstrate how the fair value of a financial asset
is to be determined when the market for that financial asset is
not active. This amendment became effective for the
Companys interim financial statements as of
September 30, 2008 and did not significantly impact the
methods by which the Company determines the fair values of its
financial assets. On April 9, 2009, the FASB amended the
authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and
disclosures (ASC 820), which requires increased analysis
and management judgment to estimate fair value if an entity
determines that either the volume
and/or
level
of activity for an asset or liability has significantly
decreased or price quotations or observable inputs are not
associated with orderly transactions. Valuation techniques such
as an income approach might be appropriate to supplement or
replace a market approach in those circumstances. This guidance
requires entities to disclose in interim and annual periods the
inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value along
with any changes in valuation techniques and related inputs
during the period. This guidance is effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Accordingly, the
Company included these new disclosures beginning April 1,
2009. See Note 10 Fair Value to the
Companys unaudited consolidated financial statements for
more information.
In June 2008, the FASB provided guidance for determining whether
an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is
indexed to an entitys own stock (ASC
815-405).
This guidance applies to any freestanding financial instrument
or embedded feature that has all of the characteristics of a
derivative or freestanding instrument that is potentially
settled in an entitys own stock (with the exception of
share-based payment awards within the scope of the authoritative
guidance for stock compensation (ASC 718)). To meet the
definition of indexed to own stock, an
instruments contingent exercise provisions must not be
based on (a) an observable market, other than the market
for the issuers stock (if applicable), or (b) an
observable index, other than an index calculated or measured
solely by reference to the issuers own operations, and the
variables that could affect the settlement amount must be inputs
to the fair value of a
fixed-for-fixed
forward or option on equity shares. This guidance is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this
guidance on January 1, 2009, did not have a material effect
on the Companys results of operations or consolidated
financial position.
On June 16, 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance
for determining whether instruments granted in share-based
payment transactions are participating securities (ASC 260).
This guidance addresses whether instruments granted in
share-based payment transactions are participating securities
prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the
earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the
two-class method. This guidance is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Accordingly, the Company adopted the provisions this
guidance effective January 1, 2009 and computed earnings
per share using the two-class method for all periods presented.
Upon adoption, the Company is required to retrospectively adjust
earnings per share data to conform to the provisions in this
guidance.
72
In December 2008, the FASB amended authoritative guidance
regarding disclosures by public entities about transfers of
financial assets (ASC 860) and interests in variable
entities (ASC 810), which requires additional disclosures about
transfers of financial assets and the involvement with variable
interest entities. These additional disclosures are intended to
provide greater transparency about a transferors
continuing involvement with transferred assets and variable
interest entities. This guidance is effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this
guidance on January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect
on the Companys results of operations or consolidated
financial position.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB amended the authoritative
guidance for interim disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments (ASC 825), which relates to fair value disclosures
in public entity financial statements for financial instruments.
This guidance increases the frequency of fair value disclosures
from annual only to quarterly. This guidance is effective for
interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations or consolidated financial
position, but enhanced required disclosures. Accordingly, the
Company included these new disclosures beginning April 1,
2009. See Note 10 Fair Value to the
Companys unaudited consolidated financial statements for
more information.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance
that reverses the recognition and reporting requirements for
other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities (ASC 320). This new guidance
revises the recognition and reporting requirements for
other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities. This guidance eliminates the
ability and intent to hold provision for debt
securities and impairment is considered to be other than
temporary if a company (i) intends to sell the security,
(ii) more likely than not will be required to sell the
security before recovering its cost, or (iii) does not
expect to recover the securitys entire amortized cost.
This guidance also eliminates the probability
standard relating to the collectibility of cash flows and
impairment is considered to be other than temporary if the
present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less
than the amortized cost (credit loss).
Other-than-temporary
losses also need to be separated between the amount related to
credit loss (which is recognized in current earnings) and the
amount related to all other factors (which is recognized in
other comprehensive income). This guidance is effective for
interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
adoption of this guidance on April, 2009 did not have a material
effect on the Companys results of operations or
consolidated financial position.
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance establishing
principles and requirements for subsequent events (ASC 855).
This guidance establishes general standards of accounting for
and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date
but before financial statements are issued or are available to
be issued. This guidance is based on the same principles as
those that currently exist in the auditing standards. An entity
must disclose the date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated and whether that date is the date the financial
statements were issued or available to be issued. This guidance
also requires disclosure of subsequent events that keep the
financial statements from being misleading. This guidance is
effective for interim or annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on
June 30, 2009 did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations or consolidated financial
position.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment
of FASB Statement No. 140. This guidance eliminates
the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, introduces
the concept of a participating interest, which will
limit the circumstances where the transfer of a portion of a
financial asset will qualify as a sale, assuming all other
derecognition criteria are met, it clarifies and amends the
derecognition criteria for determining whether a transfer
qualifies for sale accounting, and requires additional
disclosures. The Company does not believe that the adoption of
SFAS No. 166 on January 1, 2010 will have a
material effect on the Companys results of operations or
consolidated financial position. This authoritative guidance has
not yet been incorporated within the FASBs Codification.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),
which eliminates the quantitative approach previously required
for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest
entity. If an enterprise is required to consolidate an entity as
a result of the initial application of this standard, it should
describe the transition method(s) applied and shall disclose the
amount and classification in its statement of financial position
of the consolidated assets or liabilities by the transition
method(s) applied. If an enterprise is required to deconsolidate
an entity as a result of the initial application of this
standard, it
73
should disclose the amount of any cumulative effect adjustment
related to deconsolidation separately from any cumulative effect
adjustment related to consolidation of entities. The Company
does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 167 on
January 1, 2010 will have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations or consolidated financial
position. This authoritative guidance has not yet been
incorporated within the FASBs Codification.
Recent
Developments
On October 22, 2009, we entered into a forbearance
agreement with the lender under our revolving and term loan
facilities, pursuant to which, among other things, the lender
agreed to forbear from exercising the rights and remedies
available to it as a consequence of certain continuing events of
default, except for the continued imposition of the default
rates of interest. The forbearance is effective for the period
beginning July 3, 2009 until March 31, 2010, or
earlier if, among other things, we breach representations and
warranties contained in, or default on our obligations under,
the forbearance agreement, or we default on certain obligations
under our loan agreements (other than with respect to certain
financial and regulatory covenants). See
Financial Condition at September 30,
2009 Deposits and Borrowed Funds
Revolving and Term Loan Facilities; Events of Default for
additional information on our forbearance agreement and
associated risks of not completing all or a substantial portion
of our Capital Plan.
The Banks primary regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago and the Illinois Department of Financial and
Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, have recently
completed a safety and soundness examination of the Bank. As a
result of that examination, we expect that the Federal Reserve
Bank and the Division of Banking will request that the Bank
enter into a formal supervisory action requiring it to take
certain steps intended to improve its overall condition. Such a
supervisory action could require the Bank, among other things,
to: implement the capital restoration plan described below to
strengthen the Banks capital position; develop a plan to
improve the quality of the Banks loan portfolio by
charging off loans and reducing its position in assets
classified as substandard; develop and implement a
plan to enhance the Banks liquidity position; and enhance
the Banks loan underwriting and workout remediation teams.
The final supervisory action may contain other conditions and
targeted time frames as specified by the regulators.
We believe that the successful completion of all or a
significant portion of the Capital Plan will enable the Bank to
meet the requirements of any formal supervisory action with the
regulators and will ensure that the Bank is able to comply with
applicable bank regulations. However, the successful completion
of all or any portion of the Capital Plan is not assured, and if
the Company or the Bank is unable to comply with the terms of
the anticipated supervisory action or any other applicable
regulations, the Company and the Bank could become subject to
additional, heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our
regulators were to take such additional actions, the Company and
the Bank could become subject to various requirements limiting
the ability to develop new business lines, mandating additional
capital,
and/or
requiring the sale of certain assets and liabilities. Failure of
the Company to meet these conditions could lead to further
enforcement action on behalf of the regulators. The terms of any
such additional regulatory actions could have a materially
adverse effect on the business of the Bank and the Company.
On August 10, 2009, we announced that Brogan Ptacin and
Kelly J. OKeeffe, each an Executive Vice President of
Midwest Bank, had resigned from Midwest Bank effective
August 14, 2009. Messrs. Ptacin and
OKeeffes responsibilities were assigned to other
members of management.
On July 28, 2009, we announced the adoption of our Capital
Plan. See Background of the Transactions.
On July 28, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Bank and
the Company accepted the resignation of three directors,
reducing the Boards from eleven to eight members. On
September 21, 2009, we announced the death of director
Thomas A. Rosenquist. The boards of the Company and the Bank now
have seven members.
On May 6, 2009, the we announced that Roberto R. Herencia
was named president and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and the Bank, replacing J. J. Fritz, who became senior executive
vice president of the Company. Mr. Herencia, who also was
appointed to the board of directors of the Company, was formerly
president and director of Banco Popular North America based in
Chicago and executive vice president of Popular, Inc., the
parent company. Under Mr. Herencias direction, the
Company immediately tightened its loan underwriting and pricing
criteria, began aggressive balance sheet repositioning
activities, and developed a
74
comprehensive capital plan. Actions the Company has taken to
tighten its loan underwriting include tightening debt coverage
capacity and loan to value advance rates; enhancing stress
testing of new loans assuming both interest rate and credit risk
changes; determining the adequacy of prior loan repayment
sources in both the current market and potential future more
adverse markets; increasing the focus on secondary source of
repayment capacity over and above collateral; requiring
increased equity for lending transactions; and strengthening
credit risk review of guarantor liquidity and financial net
worth to support potential additional needs for equity or
capital to support loan transactions. In addition, the Bank has
identified select industries where there are perceived higher
levels of increased risk or less stability to determine current
loan exposure to these markets and determine proactive steps to
mitigate risk or exit certain industries or credit
relationships. These activities are designed to right-size the
Company by reducing the loan portfolio, both in the aggregate
and within the select industry portfolios noted above, thereby
reducing risk-weighted assets commensurate with the decreasing
amount of available capital. As a result of these activities,
the Company reported asset reductions for the second and third
quarters of 2009 and reductions in risk-weighted assets as
defined for regulatory capital purposes.
We also announced on May 6, 2009, that the Board of
Directors made the decision to suspend the dividend on the
$43.1 million of Series A Preferred Stock; defer the
dividend on the $84.8 million of Series T Preferred
Stock; and defer interest payments on $60.8 million of its
junior subordinated debentures as permitted by the terms of such
debentures. We have no current plans to resume dividend payments
in respect of the Series A Preferred Stock or the
Series T Preferred Stock or interest payments in respect of
its junior subordinated debentures.
In response to the financial crises affecting the overall
banking system and financial markets, on October 3, 2008,
the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, EESA, was
enacted. Under the EESA, the U.S. Treasury has the
authority to, among other things, purchase mortgages, mortgage
backed securities and certain other financial instruments from
financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing and
providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets.
On October 3, 2008 the Troubled Asset Relief Program, TARP,
became effective. The TARP gave the U.S. Treasury authority
to deploy up to $700 billion into the financial system with
an objective of improving liquidity in capital markets. On
October 14, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced plans to
direct $250 billion of this authority into preferred stock
investments in financial institutions. The general terms of this
preferred stock program are as follows for a participant: pay 5%
dividends on the U.S. Treasurys preferred stock for
the first five years and 9% dividends thereafter; cannot
increase common stock dividends for three years while
U.S. Treasury is an investor without their permission; the
U.S. Treasury receives warrants entitling it to buy a
participants common stock equal to 15% of the
U.S. Treasurys total initial investment in the
participant; and the participating companys executives
must agree to certain compensation restrictions, and
restrictions on the amount of executive compensation which is
tax deductible and other detailed terms and conditions. The
terms of this preferred stock program could reduce investment
returns to participating companies stockholders by
restricting dividends to common stockholders, diluting existing
stockholders interests, and restricting capital management
practices. The TARP capital purchase program, CPP, is a
voluntary program designed to help healthy institutions build
capital to support the U.S. economy by increasing the flow
of financing to U.S. businesses and consumers.
Although the Company then exceeded all applicable regulatory
capital requirements, it submitted an application for
participation in the CPP and, on December 5, 2008, it sold
84,784 shares of Series T Preferred Stock to the
U.S. Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of
$84.784 million and issued a warrant to the
U.S. Treasury which will allow it to acquire
4,282,020 shares of its common stock for $2.97 per share.
The Series T Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1
capital and will pay cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per
annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum thereafter. The
Series T Preferred Stock may be redeemed by the Company
after three years. Prior to the end of three years, the
Series T Preferred Stock may be redeemed by the Company
only with proceeds from the sale of qualifying equity
securities. The senior preferred stock is non-voting, other than
class voting rights on certain matters that could amend the
rights of or adversely affect the stock.
75
If the Company completes one or more qualified equity offerings
on or prior to December 31, 2009 that result in its receipt
of aggregate gross proceeds of not less than
$84.784 million, which is equal to 100% of the aggregate
liquidation preference of the Series T Preferred Stock, the
number of shares of common stock underlying the warrant then
held by the selling securityholders will be reduced by 50% to
2,141,010 shares. The number of shares for which the
warrant may be exercised and the exercise price applicable to
the warrant will be proportionately adjusted in the event the
Company pays stock dividends or makes distributions of its
common stock, subdivide, combine or reclassify outstanding
shares of its common stock. As part of our Capital Plan, we
intend to seek the exchange of the Series T Preferred Stock
for another class of convertible preferred stock to be issued to
the U.S. Treasury. See Background of the
Transactions.
The EESA included a provision for an increase in the amount of
deposits insured by the FDIC to $250,000 until December 2009. On
October 14, 2008, the FDIC announced a new program, the
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, that provides unlimited
deposit insurance on funds in noninterest-bearing transaction
deposit accounts not otherwise covered by the existing deposit
insurance limit of $250,000. The Company has elected to
participate in the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program and
incur a 10 basis point surcharge as a cost of
participation. The behavior of depositors in regard to the level
of FDIC insurance could cause the Companys existing
customers to reduce the amount of deposits held at the Company,
or could cause new customers to open deposit accounts. The level
and composition of the Companys deposit portfolio directly
impacts its funding cost and net interest margin.
The EESA followed, and has been followed by, numerous actions by
the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Congress, U.S. Treasury,
the FDIC, the SEC and others to address the current liquidity
and credit crisis that has followed the
sub-prime
meltdown that commenced in 2007. These measures include
homeowner relief that encourage loan restructuring and
modification; the establishment of significant liquidity and
credit facilities for financial institutions and investment
banks; the lowering of the federal funds rate; emergency action
against short selling practices; a temporary guaranty program
for money market funds; the establishment of a commercial paper
funding facility to provide back-stop liquidity to commercial
paper issuers; and coordinated international efforts to address
illiquidity and other weaknesses in the banking sector.
On February 17, 2009, President Barack Obama signed the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, ARRA, more
commonly known as the economic stimulus or economic recovery
package. ARRA includes a wide variety of programs intended to
stimulate the economy and provide for extensive infrastructure,
energy, health and education needs. In addition, ARRA imposes
new executive compensation and corporate governance limits on
current and future participants in TARP, including the Company,
which are in addition to those previously announced by
U.S. Treasury. The new limits remain in place until the
participant has redeemed the preferred stock sold to
U.S. Treasury, which is now permitted under ARRA without
penalty and without the need to raise new capital, subject to
U.S. Treasurys consultation with the recipients
appropriate federal regulator.
Among the provisions in the ARRA are restrictions affecting
financial institutions that are participating in the CPP. These
provisions are set forth in the form of amendments to the EESA.
The amendments provide that during the period in which any TARP
obligation is outstanding (other than those relating to
warrants), TARP recipients are subject to standards for
executive compensation and corporate governance to be set forth
in regulations to be issued by the U.S. Treasury. Among
these provisions included in ARRA are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
a limitation on incentive compensation paid or accrued to the
top five executive officers based on the amount of TARP funds
that the Company received. Under the provision, incentive
compensation paid to such individuals may not exceed one-third
of the individuals annual compensation. It must be paid in
restricted stock that does not fully vest during the period in
which any obligation arising from financial assistance provided
under TARP remains outstanding;
|
|
|
|
an expansion of the prohibitions on certain golden parachute
payments to cover any severance payment for a departure for any
reason (subject to certain limited exceptions) made to the
senior executives named in the 2009 proxy statement and the next
five highest paid employees;
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
a requirement that the chief executive officer and chief
financial officer provide a written certification of compliance
with certain executive compensation and corporate governance
provisions in annual securities filings;
|
|
|
|
a requirement that companies adopt a company-wide policy
regarding excessive or luxury expenditures as they relate to
entertainment, renovations to offices or facilities, and
aviation and other transportation services; and
|
|
|
|
a requirement that companies permit a separate non-binding
stockholder vote to approve the compensation of senior executive
officers.
|
See Business Supervision and
Regulation Recent Developments for
further discussion of recent developments concerning regulatory
restrictions or executive compensation.
In 2009, the FDIC increased premium assessments to maintain
adequate funding of the Deposit Insurance Fund. Assessment rates
set by the FDIC, effective March 1, 2009, generally range
from 12 to 45 basis points; however, these rates may be
adjusted upward or downward if the institution has unsecured
debt or secured liabilities. As a result, assessment rates for
institutions may range from 7 basis points to
77.5 basis points. These increases in premium assessments
have increased the Companys expenses. In addition, on
May 22, 2009, the FDIC board agreed to impose an emergency
special assessment of 5 basis points on all banks (based on
June 30, 2009 assets) to restore the Deposit Insurance Fund
to an acceptable level. The assessment was paid on
September 30, 2009 and was in addition to the increase in
premiums discussed above. The cost of this emergency special
assessment was $1.7 million. On November 12, 2009, the
FDIC issued new assessment regulations that require FDIC-insured
institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009 their estimated
quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth
quarter 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012; however
certain financial institutions, including the Bank, were
exempted from the new prepayment regulations and will continue
to pay their risk-based assessments on a quarterly basis.
2008
Developments
The Company recognized a non-cash, non-operating,
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $47.8 million at September 30,
2008 on certain FNMA and FHLMC preferred equity securities
similar to the impairment charge of $17.6 million taken in
the first quarter of 2008. In September 2008, the Company sold a
portion of its FNMA and FHLMC preferred equity securities
recognizing a $16.7 million loss. It also recognized an
impairment charge $80.0 million on its goodwill intangible
asset based upon an appraisal by an independent third party. The
decline in value was primarily the result of a decline in market
capitalization. During 2008, the Company recognized net loan
charge-offs of $54.1 million and recorded a
$71.8 million loan loss provision, reflecting
managements updated assessments of impaired loans and
concerns about the continued deterioration of economic
conditions. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company also
incurred a $7.1 million loss on the early extinguishment of
debt arising from the prepayment of $130.0 million in FHLB
advances, and recognized a $15.2 million gain on the sale
of real estate.
On December 16, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company
and the Bank elected Percy L. Berger Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Company and the Bank effective
December 31, 2008. Mr. Berger replaced Homer J.
Livingston, Jr. who resigned as a Director and Chairman
effective December 31, 2008.
2007
Developments
On October 1, 2007, the Company completed its acquisition
of Northwest Suburban in a cash and stock merger transaction. At
acquisition, Northwest Suburban had total assets of
$546.2 million. The agreement and plan of merger provided
that the Companys stock comprised up to 45% of the
purchase price, at an exchange ratio of 2.4551 shares of
Company common stock for each Northwest Suburban common share,
and that the remainder be paid in cash at the rate of $42.75 for
each share of Northwest Suburban common stock. The Company
issued 3.7 million shares of common stock, paid
$81.2 million in cash, and incurred $414,000 in costs that
were capitalized for a total purchase price of
$136.7 million. Mr. Dennis M. OHara, a director
of Northwest Suburban, joined the Board of Directors of the
Company and the Bank upon closing. Mr. John G. Eilering,
Northwest Suburbans Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
joined the Bank as Area President
77
Northwest. Mr. Stephan L. Markovits, President of Northwest
Suburban joined the Bank as Executive Vice President
Commercial Lending. The systems conversions were successfully
completed during the weekend of October 27. The Company
used the proceeds from a $75.0 million term note under a
borrowing facility it has with a correspondent bank to pay for a
portion of the cash requirement of the acquisition. The term
note had an initial rate of one-month LIBOR plus 140 basis
points and matures on September 28, 2010.
This acquisition added five more branches and made the Company,
based on deposits, the 17th largest bank in the Chicago
area as well as expanding the Companys geographic
footprint in the northwest suburbs. Northwest Suburbans
branch locations in Des Plaines, Lakemoor, Lake Zurich, Mount
Prospect, and North Barrington provide a complimentary
addition to the Companys branches in northwest Cook,
DuPage, Kane, Lake, and McHenry counties. In addition, the
Company believes that this acquisition will contribute to
expansion and diversification of its loan portfolio, its deposit
base, and its noninterest income. All key sales professionals
from Northwest Suburban were retained.
In December 2007, the Company raised $41.4 million in new
equity capital, net of issuance costs, through an offering of
1,725,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a
share of its Series A noncumulative redeemable convertible
perpetual preferred stock, at $25.00 per depositary share. The
infusion of capital strengthened the Companys balance
sheet as well as allowed it to partially pay down balances
outstanding on its term note and revolving line of credit and
contribute capital to the Bank.
Consolidated
Results of Operations
Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Three
and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and Three Months
Ended June 30, 2009
Set forth below are highlights of the third quarter of 2009
results compared to the third quarter of 2008 and the second
quarter of 2009.
Basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 was $1.52 compared to $5.76 for the
comparable period in 2008 and $2.78 for the second quarter of
2009. Net loss for the third quarter of 2009 was
$41.3 million compared to $76.5 million loss in the
second quarter of 2009 and loss of $159.7 million for the
third quarter of 2008. The results of the second quarter of 2009
included a $57.9 million tax charge due to a valuation
allowance on deferred tax assets and an $8.1 million tax
charge related to the liquidation of bank owned life insurance
which was partly offset by the $4.3 million in net gains on
the securities portfolio repositioning.
The annualized return on average assets for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 was (4.49)% compared to (17.25)%
for the similar period in 2008 and (8.38)% for the second
quarter of 2009. The annualized return on average equity for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 was (78.30)% compared
to (181.60)% for the similar period in 2008 and (103.60)% for
the second quarter of 2009.
Net interest income decreased 28.0% to $15.9 million in the
third quarter of 2009 compared to $22.2 million in the
third quarter of 2008 and was 24.3% lower than the second
quarter of 2009. Similarly, the net interest margin decreased to
1.83% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to 2.52% in the
second quarter of 2009 and 2.77% in the third quarter of 2008,
as a result of repositioning the securities portfolio into
shorter term lower yielding securities in the second quarter of
2009, the net reversals of interest income related to the
increase in nonaccrual loans, the decrease in loan balances, and
the increase in low-yielding interest-bearing deposits due from
banks.
The provision for credit losses was $37.5 million in the
third quarter of 2009 compared to $42.2 million for the
comparable period in 2008 and $20.8 million in the second
quarter of 2009. The increase in provision for credit losses in
the third quarter of 2009 was due to the large increase in
nonaccrual loans. See Financial Condition
Allowance for Loan Losses.
Noninterest income was $3.7 million in the third quarter of
2009 compared to ($60.5) million in the third quarter of
2008 and $7.3 million in the second quarter of 2009. The
third quarter of 2008 included
78
$16.7 million in securities losses and a $47.8 million
securities impairment loss. The second quarter of 2009 included
$4.3 million of net gains on the securities portfolio
repositioning.
Noninterest expenses decreased $80.6 million to
$22.5 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to
$103.0 million in the third quarter of 2008 and were
$2.0 million lower than the $24.4 million in the
second quarter of 2009. The third quarter of 2008 included an
$80.0 million goodwill impairment charge. The Company also
completed its annual goodwill impairment study as of
September 30, 2009 and determined that goodwill was not
impaired. The decline in noninterest expense of
$2.0 million in the third quarter of 2009 reflects the
impact of the cost reduction efforts, which began late in the
second quarter of 2009. Excluding one time impacts, salaries and
benefits were $1.8 million lower compared to the second
quarter reflecting a reduction in force of 77 full-time
equivalent (FTE) employees (116 FTE employees, or a
21.6% reduction year to date), salary reductions for remaining
employees, and suspension of the Companys 401(k)
contribution. The decrease in noninterest expenses compared to
the previous quarter was also due to the FDIC insurance special
assessment of $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Set forth below are highlights of the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 results compared to the results for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
$123.1 million, or $4.57 per basic and diluted share,
compared to $162.7 million, or $5.93 per basic and diluted
share, for the same period in 2008. The annualized return on
average assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
was (4.50)% compared to (5.90)% for the similar period in 2008.
The results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
included a $57.9 million tax charge due to a valuation
allowance on its deferred tax assets and an $8.1 million
tax charge related to the liquidation of bank owned life
insurance which was partly offset by the $4.6 million in
net gains on the securities portfolio mainly due to the
repositioning. The results of the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 included impairment charges on
securities and goodwill of $65.4 million and
$80.0 million, respectively, net losses on securities
transactions and extinguishement of debt of $16.6 million
and $7.1 million, respectively, and a gain on the sale of
property of $15.2 million. The annualized return on average
equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
(61.15)% compared to (58.64)% for the similar period in 2008.
Net interest income decreased 13.5% to $58.1 million in the
first nine months of 2009 compared to $67.1 million in the
first nine months of 2008 largely due to the repositioning the
securities portfolio into shorter term lower yielding securities
in the second quarter of 2009 and the net interest reversals
related to the increase in nonaccrual loans. The net interest
margin was 2.30% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to 2.83% for the similar period of 2008.
The provision for credit losses was $71.5 million in the
first nine months of 2009 compared to $52.4 million for the
comparable period in 2008 due to a large increase in nonaccrual
loans. Noninterest income increased to $14.3 million in the
first nine months of 2009 compared to ($54.3) million in
the same period of 2008. The increase in cash surrender value of
life insurance decreased $1.3 million compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. Noninterest expenses
decreased to $68.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $151.7 million for the
similar period of 2008. FDIC insurance expense increased
$3.9 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2009 to $6.0 million compared to the same period in 2008
due to the FDIC insurance special assessment of
$1.7 million and increased regular quarterly FDIC premiums.
The increase in foreclosed properties expense of
$3.6 million and $1.5 million increase in professional
services expenses were partly offset by the decrease in salaries
and benefits expense of $4.7 million.
79
Net
Interest Income
The following table sets forth the average balances, net
interest income on a tax equivalent basis and average yields and
rates for the Companys interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities for the indicated periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits due from banks
|
|
$
|
303,890
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,005
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
$
|
59,551
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable(1)
|
|
|
637,198
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
654,531
|
|
|
|
7,823
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
|
|
|
626,489
|
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
Exempt from federal income taxes(1)
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
4.85
|
|
|
|
60,688
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
5.82
|
|
|
|
43,005
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
3.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
639,588
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
715,219
|
|
|
|
8,706
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
|
|
|
669,494
|
|
|
|
5,069
|
|
|
|
3.03
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
|
|
27,999
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
29,694
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
|
30,301
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
527,661
|
|
|
|
7,015
|
|
|
|
5.32
|
|
|
|
544,013
|
|
|
|
8,145
|
|
|
|
5.99
|
|
|
|
549,168
|
|
|
|
6,770
|
|
|
|
4.93
|
|
Commercial real estate loans(1)(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
1,620,388
|
|
|
|
22,416
|
|
|
|
5.53
|
|
|
|
1,639,444
|
|
|
|
24,919
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
1,675,704
|
|
|
|
24,608
|
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
Agricultural loans(2)(3)
|
|
|
8,350
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
6.37
|
|
|
|
6,531
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
6.31
|
|
|
|
9,991
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
6.57
|
|
Consumer real estate loans(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
343,128
|
|
|
|
3,640
|
|
|
|
4.24
|
|
|
|
314,377
|
|
|
|
4,119
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
|
|
|
343,898
|
|
|
|
3,708
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
Consumer installment loans(2)(3)
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
6.42
|
|
|
|
8,288
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
6.85
|
|
|
|
5,996
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
6.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2,505,134
|
|
|
|
33,294
|
|
|
|
5.32
|
|
|
|
2,512,653
|
|
|
|
37,428
|
|
|
|
5.96
|
|
|
|
2,584,757
|
|
|
|
35,348
|
|
|
|
5.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
3,476,611
|
|
|
$
|
35,135
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,263,571
|
|
|
$
|
46,345
|
|
|
|
5.68
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,344,103
|
|
|
$
|
40,662
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
Noninterest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
34,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
40,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(67,605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,211
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
165,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-earning assets
|
|
|
173,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,650,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,682,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,660,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
179,094
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
|
$
|
194,416
|
|
|
$
|
422
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
178,231
|
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
Money-market demand and savings accounts
|
|
|
344,203
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
393,745
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
358,791
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,765,654
|
|
|
|
10,493
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
1,487,827
|
|
|
|
13,695
|
|
|
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
1,658,904
|
|
|
|
11,267
|
|
|
|
2.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,288,951
|
|
|
|
11,385
|
|
|
|
1.99
|
|
|
|
2,075,988
|
|
|
|
15,301
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
2,195,926
|
|
|
|
12,210
|
|
|
|
2.22
|
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased, FRB discount window advances, and
repurchase agreements
|
|
|
297,693
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
403,025
|
|
|
|
3,901
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
|
|
|
319,397
|
|
|
|
3,249
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
3,065
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
|
|
|
348,315
|
|
|
|
2,779
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
342,637
|
|
|
|
3,035
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,827
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
60,766
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
5.69
|
|
|
|
60,816
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
7.35
|
|
|
|
9,404
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
4.08
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
4.94
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
777,120
|
|
|
|
7,808
|
|
|
|
4.02
|
|
|
|
891,510
|
|
|
|
8,434
|
|
|
|
3.78
|
|
|
|
801,450
|
|
|
|
7,397
|
|
|
|
3.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
3,066,071
|
|
|
$
|
19,193
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,967,498
|
|
|
$
|
23,735
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,997,376
|
|
|
$
|
19,607
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
%
|
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
341,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
335,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
333,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
33,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
374,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
209,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,650,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,682,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,660,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (tax equivalent)(1)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,942
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,610
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,055
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
Net interest income(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.72
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
113.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109.98
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Adjusted for 35% tax rate and adjusted for the
dividends-received deduction, except for the quarters ended
September 30, and June 30, 2009 as a result of the
Companys current tax position.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance; however,
these loans are not earning any interest.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes loan fees of $528, $900, and $574 for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008, and
June 30, 2009, respectively.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes construction loans.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The following table reconciles reported net interest income on a
tax equivalent basis for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
15,942
|
|
|
$
|
22,153
|
|
|
$
|
21,055
|
|
Tax equivalent adjustment to net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, tax equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
15,942
|
|
|
$
|
22,610
|
|
|
$
|
21,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Not adjusted for 35% tax rate or for the dividends-received
deduction.
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits due from banks
|
|
$
|
123,838
|
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,840
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable(1)
|
|
|
631,184
|
|
|
|
13,091
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
686,517
|
|
|
|
26,901
|
|
|
|
5.22
|
|
Exempt from federal income taxes(1)
|
|
|
34,443
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
61,388
|
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
5.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
665,627
|
|
|
|
14,076
|
|
|
|
2.82
|
|
|
|
747,905
|
|
|
|
29,616
|
|
|
|
5.28
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
|
|
29,986
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
29,397
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans(1)(2)(3)
|
|
|
535,755
|
|
|
|
20,336
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
|
|
510,213
|
|
|
|
24,282
|
|
|
|
6.35
|
|
Commercial real estate loans(1)(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
1,653,125
|
|
|
|
71,230
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
1,638,120
|
|
|
|
77,716
|
|
|
|
6.33
|
|
Agricultural loans(2)(3)
|
|
|
8,622
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
6,029
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
6.41
|
|
Consumer real estate loans(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
340,959
|
|
|
|
10,914
|
|
|
|
4.27
|
|
|
|
313,247
|
|
|
|
12,950
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
|
Consumer installment loans(2)(3)
|
|
|
5,951
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
6.61
|
|
|
|
9,843
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
6.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2,544,412
|
|
|
|
103,191
|
|
|
|
5.41
|
|
|
|
2,477,452
|
|
|
|
115,745
|
|
|
|
6.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
3,363,863
|
|
|
$
|
118,063
|
|
|
|
4.68
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,271,594
|
|
|
$
|
146,185
|
|
|
|
5.96
|
%
|
Noninterest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
49,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
39,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(57,517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,584
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
258,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-earning assets
|
|
|
289,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,653,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,685,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
176,893
|
|
|
$
|
683
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
|
$
|
208,949
|
|
|
$
|
1,660
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
Money-market demand and savings accounts
|
|
|
351,563
|
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
401,377
|
|
|
|
4,209
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,681,472
|
|
|
|
34,436
|
|
|
|
2.73
|
|
|
|
1,468,836
|
|
|
|
44,632
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,209,928
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
2,079,162
|
|
|
|
50,501
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased, FRB discount window advances and
repurchase agreements
|
|
|
316,893
|
|
|
|
9,747
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
418,992
|
|
|
|
12,048
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
348,462
|
|
|
|
9,129
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
|
|
|
319,943
|
|
|
|
8,698
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,814
|
|
|
|
1,851
|
|
|
|
4.06
|
|
|
|
60,749
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
3.92
|
|
|
|
10,073
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
6.14
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
59,927
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
804,769
|
|
|
|
22,684
|
|
|
|
3.76
|
|
|
|
877,911
|
|
|
|
26,292
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
3,014,697
|
|
|
$
|
59,964
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,957,073
|
|
|
$
|
76,793
|
|
|
|
3.46
|
%
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
335,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
324,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
34,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
369,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
269,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,653,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,685,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (tax equivalent)(1)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
69,392
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
Net interest income(5)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
67,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
111.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Adjusted for 35% tax rate and adjusted for the
dividends-received deduction, except for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 as a result of the Companys
current tax position
|
|
(2)
|
|
Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance; however,
these loans are not earning any interest.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes loan fees of $1,580 and $2,288 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes construction loans.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The following table reconciles reported net interest income on a
tax equivalent basis for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended, September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
$
|
67,134
|
|
Tax equivalent adjustment to net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, tax equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
58,099
|
|
|
$
|
69,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Not adjusted for 35% tax rate or for the dividends-received
deduction.
|
Net interest income is the difference between interest income
and fees on earning assets and interest expense on deposits and
borrowings. Net interest margin represents net interest income
as a percentage of average earning assets during the period.
Net interest income decreased by $6.2 million, or 28.0%, to
$15.9 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the
same period in 2008 and decreased by $5.1 million compared
to the previous quarter. Net interest income declined by
$9.0 million, or 13.5%, to $58.1 million in the first
nine months of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. As a
result of the securities portfolio repositioning in the second
quarter, reversals of interest income related to the increase in
nonaccrual loans, and the decrease in loan balances, the net
interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, decreased to 1.83%
for the third quarter of 2009 compared to 2.52% for the second
quarter of 2009 and 2.77% for the third quarter of 2008. The net
interest margin declined to 2.30% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to 2.83% for the same period in
2008, as a result of the securities portfolio repositioning in
the second quarter of 2009, reversals of interest income related
to the increase in nonaccrual loans, and the lower yields earned
on loans. Due to the Companys
83
current tax position, the net interest margin for the 2009
periods does not reflect a fully taxable-equivalent adjustment.
Trends
in Interest-earning Assets
Yields on average interest-earning assets decreased by
164 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 compared to
the third quarter of 2008, while average balances on
interest-earning assets increased by $213.0 million, mainly
as the result of the increase in interest-bearing deposits due
from banks. Yields on average interest-earning assets decreased
by 82 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2009.
Yields on average earning assets decreased 128 basis points
in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the similar period
in 2008, while average balances increased $92.3 million.
The decrease in yields was primarily due to the decrease in the
overall market rates impacting variable rate loans, interest
foregone on nonaccruing loans, and the decline in interest
income on securities due to the securities portfolio
repositioning into shorter term, lower yielding securities.
Average yields on loans for the third quarter of 2009 decreased
by 15 basis points to 5.32% compared to the second quarter
of 2009 and were 64 basis points lower compared to the same
period in 2008. For the first nine months of 2009, average
yields on loans decreased by 82 basis points to 5.41%
compared to the same period of 2008. This decline in yields was
primarily due to the re-pricing of the variable rate loans
resulting from decreases in the prime rate which was partially
mitigated by interest rate floors. Average loans decreased by
$7.5 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2009
compared to the same period in 2008 and decreased by
$79.6 million compared to the second quarter of 2009.
Average loans increased by $67.0 million in the first nine
months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Yields on average securities decreased in the third quarter of
2009 compared to the prior quarter and the same period in 2008
by 208 basis points and 392 basis points,
respectively, due largely to the repositioning of the securities
portfolio into shorter term lower, yielding securities. Average
securities decreased by $75.6 million in the third quarter
of 2009 compared to the similar period in 2008 and decreased by
$29.9 million compared to the second quarter of 2009,
mainly due to sales. Yields on average securities decreased by
246 basis points in the first nine months of 2009 compared
to the similar period in 2008 and average balances decreased by
$82.3 million.
During second quarter of 2009, the Company repositioned its
securities portfolio to lower capital requirements associated
with higher risk-weighted assets, restructure expected cash
flows, reduce credit risk, and enhance the Banks asset
sensitivity. The Company sold $538.1 million of its
securities portfolio with an average yield of 3.94% and average
life of slightly over two years. These securities were sold in
the open market at a net gain of $4.3 million. The Company
purchased $571.0 million of U.S. Treasury bills and
Government National Mortgage Association mortgage-backed
securities. The average yield on these securities is 0.43% with
an average life of less than six months.
Trends
in Interest-bearing Liabilities
The Companys cost of funds decreased by 12 basis
points on a linked-quarter basis as a result of decreased rates
paid on interest-bearing deposits. Average interest-bearing
liabilities increased by $68.7 million for the third
quarter of 2009 compared to the prior quarter. Yields on average
interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 70 basis points
due to the lower costs of interest-bearing deposits, while
average balances increased $98.6 million in the third
quarter of 2009 compared to the similar period in 2008. When
compared to the first nine months of 2008, the cost of funds
decreased by 81 basis points to 2.65% for the first nine
months of 2009 due to the lower costs of interest-bearing
deposits, while average interest-bearing liabilities increased
$57.6 million.
Average interest-bearing deposits increased by
$213.0 million, while average rates decreased 96 basis
points in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the similar
period of 2008. Average rates paid on interest-bearing deposits
decreased by 23 basis points to 1.99% for the third quarter
of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2009, but average
balances increased by $93.0 million. Yields on average
interest-bearing deposits decreased by 99 basis points in
the first nine months of 2009 compared to the similar period in
2008, and
84
average balances increased by $130.8 million. Most of the
decrease in average rates was in certificates of deposit that
matured and re-priced at lower rates.
Average interest-bearing demand deposit, money market, and
savings accounts decreased by $13.7 million for the third
quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2009 and
decreased by $64.9 million compared to the third quarter of
2008. On a
year-to-date
basis, average interest-bearing demand deposit, money market,
and savings accounts decreased by $81.9 million compared to
2008.
The costs of average borrowings increased by 24 basis
points in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period
in 2008, while average balances decreased by
$114.4 million. Less reliance on borrowings was largely due
to increased funds from deposits. Average borrowings decreased
by $24.3 million in the third quarter of 2009 over the
second quarter of 2009, while average rates paid increased by
33 basis points to 4.02% due to the increase to the default
rates on the revolving and term notes payable. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, average borrowings
decreased by $73.1 million and average rates paid decreased
by 23 basis points, largely due to decreases in short-term
LIBOR rates.
Noninterest
Income
Set forth below is a summary of the third quarter 2009
noninterest income activity compared to the third quarter of
2008 and second quarter of 2009.
The annualized noninterest income to average assets ratio was
0.40% for the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared to (6.54)% for the same period in 2008 and 0.80% for
the three months ended June 30, 2009, as a result of the
changes in noninterest income discussed below. Noninterest
income was $3.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, an increase of $64.2 million over
the comparable period in 2008. Noninterest income for third
quarter of 2008 included losses on securities transactions of
$16.7 million and an impairment charge on securities of
$47.8 million. Noninterest income for the third quarter of
2009 was $3.6 million lower than the second quarter of
2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to the net gains
less impairment charges on the securities portfolio
repositioning of $3.5 million recognized in the second
quarter of 2009.
Service charges on deposits in the third quarter of 2009 were
flat at $2.0 million when compared to the same period in
2008 and the second quarter of 2009. Insurance and brokerage
commissions for the three months ended September 30, 2009
decreased by $180,000, or 40.2%, to $268,000 when compared to
the third quarter of 2008, and decreased by $70,000 when
compared to the second quarter of 2009. These decreases are
mostly due to the difficult economy. Trust income decreased by
$114,000 in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third
quarter of 2008 due to the decreased value of trust assets under
management but increased by $41,000 compared to the second
quarter of 2009. Income from the increase in the cash surrender
value of life insurance decreased by $911,000 and $491,000 for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the
similar period in 2008 and the second quarter of 2009,
respectively, reflecting the liquidation of the bank owned life
insurance during the second quarter of 2009.
Set forth below is a summary of the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 noninterest income activity compared to
the same period in 2008.
The annualized noninterest income to average assets ratio was
0.52% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to (1.97)% for the same period in 2008, as a result of the
changes in noninterest income discussed below. Noninterest
income was $14.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, an increase of $68.6 million over
the comparable period in 2008. In the first nine months of 2008,
the Company recognized an impairment charge on securities of
$65.4 million, net losses of $16.6 million on
securities transactions, and a gain on the sale of property of
$15.2 million.
Service charges on deposits in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 were flat at $5.9 million when
compared to the same period in 2008. Insurance and brokerage
commissions for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
decreased by $765,000, or 45.2%, when compared to the same
period in 2008, mostly due to the difficult economy causing a
lower volume of transactions. Trust income decreased by $467,000
in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in
2008, partially due to market value decreases and
85
loss of accounts. Trust income is largely based on a percentage
of assets under management. Income from the increase in the cash
surrender value of life insurance decreased by 49.4% to
$1.3 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the similar period in 2008,
reflecting the liquidation of the bank owned life insurance in
the second quarter of 2009.
Noninterest
Expenses
Set forth below is a summary of the third quarter 2009
noninterest expenses compared to the third quarter of 2008 and
the second quarter of 2009.
The annualized noninterest expenses to average assets ratio was
2.44% for the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared to 11.16% for the same period in 2008 and 2.76% for the
three months ended June 30, 2009, as a result of the
changes in noninterest expense discussed below. Total
noninterest expenses decreased by $80.6 million, to
$22.5 million during the third quarter of 2009 compared to
$103.0 million for the similar period in 2008. Noninterest
expenses for third quarter of 2008 included a goodwill
impairment charge of $80.0 million. The decline in
noninterest expense of $2.0 million in the third quarter of
2009 compared to the second quarter of 2009 reflects the impact
of the cost reduction efforts, which began late in the second
quarter of 2009. Excluding one time impacts, salaries and
benefits were $1.8 million lower compared to the second
quarter reflecting a reduction in force of 77 full-time
equivalent (FTE) employees (116 FTE employees, or a
21.6% reduction year to date), salary reductions for remaining
employees, and the suspension of the Companys 401(k)
contribution. The decrease in noninterest expenses compared to
the previous quarter was also due to the FDIC insurance special
assessment of $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Salaries and benefits expense decreased by $3.6 million, or
28.5%, during the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third
quarter of 2008 and by $2.9 million, or 24.5%, compared to
the second quarter of 2009, due to the cost reduction
initiatives described above as well as the decrease in incentive
and stock based compensation expenses. Occupancy and equipment
expense was relatively flat during the third quarter of 2009 at
$3.2 million compared to the similar period in 2008, but
decreased by $181,000, or 5.4%, compared to the second quarter
of 2009, mainly due to decreased rent and maintenance expenses.
Professional services expense rose by $822,000 to
$2.8 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the
third quarter of 2008. Professional services expense increased
by $948,000 compared to the second quarter of 2009. This
increase was due to the increased legal and consulting fees
related to capital plan activities, the goodwill study, and loan
portfolio credit-loss studies. Marketing expenses in the third
quarter of 2009 were $374,000 lower than in the third quarter of
2008 and $138,000 lower than the second quarter of 2009, as
certain programs were scaled back or put on hold in order to
control costs. Foreclosed properties expense increased in the
third quarter of 2009 by $3.1 million and $2.6 million
compared to the third quarter of 2008 and second quarter of
2009, respectively, due to the increase in foreclosed properties
and the write-down of certain properties to current fair value
less costs to sell. The average balance of foreclosed properties
was $20.8 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared to
$18.7 million for the second quarter of 2009.
Set forth below is a summary of noninterest expenses for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same
period in 2008.
The annualized noninterest expenses to average assets ratio was
2.50% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to 5.52% for the same period in 2008. Total noninterest expenses
decreased $83.3 million to $68.4 million during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
$151.7 million for the similar period in 2008. The Company
recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $80.0 million
and a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of
$7.1 million resulting from the prepayment of
$130.0 million in advances from the FHLB in 2008.
Salaries and benefits expense decreased by $4.7 million, or
12.8%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to the same period in 2008, which was due in large part
to decrease of $2.9 million in incentive expense and
$1.4 million in stock-based compensation expense. This
decrease was also due to the reduction in force of 130 FTE
employees from September 30, 2008, salary reductions for
remaining employees, and the suspension of the Companys
401(k) contribution. Occupancy and equipment
86
expense increased by $573,000, or 6.2%, during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 to $9.8 million compared to
the similar period in 2009 mainly due to increased rent and
maintenance expenses. Professional services expense rose by $1.5
million, or 27.7%, to $6.8 million in the first nine months
of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 due to higher legal,
including legal expenses related to problem loan workouts, and
consulting expenses related to capital plan activities, the
goodwill study, and loan portfolio credit-loss studies.
Marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 were $1.2 million, or 34.1% lower than in the same
period in 2008, as certain programs were scaled back or put on
hold in an effort to control costs. Foreclosed properties
expense increased in the nine months ended September 30,
2009 by $3.6 million compared to the same period in 2008,
due to the increase in foreclosed properties and the write-down
of certain properties to updated fair values less costs to sell.
Foreclosed properties were $21.0 million at
September 30, 2009 compared to $12.0 million at year
end 2008. FDIC insurance expense increased $3.9 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to
$6.0 million compared to the same period in 2008 due to the
special assessment of $1.7 million and increased regular
quarterly FDIC premiums.
Income
Taxes
The Company recorded income tax expense of $966,000 and an
income tax benefit of $23.9 million for the quarters ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded
income tax expense of $55.6 million compared to an income
tax benefit of $28.5 million for the same period of 2008.
The change in the effective tax rate reflects $57.9 million
related to the recognition of a valuation allowance on deferred
tax assets and the $8.1 million tax charge related to the
liquidation of bank owned life insurance in the second quarter
of 2009. The Companys marginal tax rate is approximately
40%; however, under current conditions the Company would expect
to offset any tax benefits earned with similar increases in the
valuation allowance.
87
The difference between the provision for income taxes in the
consolidated financial statements and amounts computed by
applying the current federal statutory income tax rate of 35% to
income before income taxes is reconciled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Income taxes computed at the statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(14,105
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(64,262
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(23,603
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(66,931
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Tax-exempt interest income on securities and loans
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
General business credits
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit due to state
operating loss
|
|
|
(2,388
|
)
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
(2,137
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(2,607
|
)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
(2,898
|
)
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Life insurance cash surrender value increase, net of premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(922
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Liquidation of bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,924
|
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received deduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
17,397
|
|
|
|
(43.2
|
)
|
|
|
14,851
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
75,259
|
|
|
|
(111.7
|
)
|
|
|
14,851
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
Nondeductible costs and other, net
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(23,891
|
)
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
55,617
|
|
|
|
(82.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(28,530
|
)
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company increased the total valuation allowance by
$16.9 million to $76.9 million against its existing
net deferred tax assets during the third quarter of 2009. The
valuation allowance includes $1.6 million recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive loss fully offsetting deferred
taxes which were established for securities available for sale
and for the SERP program. The Companys primary deferred
tax assets relate to its allowance for loan losses, net
operating losses (NOLs) and impairment charges
relating to FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock holdings. Under
generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation allowance
is required to be recognized if it is more likely than
not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized. In
making that determination, management is required to evaluate
both positive and negative evidence including recent historical
financial performance, forecasts of future income, tax planning
strategies and assessments of the current and future economic
and business conditions. The Company performs and updates this
evaluation on a quarterly basis.
In conducting its regular quarterly evaluation, the Company made
a determination to maintain the valuation allowance as of
September 30, 2009 based primarily upon the existence of a
three year cumulative loss derived by combining the pre-tax
income (loss) reported during the two most recent annual periods
(calendar years ended 2007 and 2008) with managements
current projected results for the year ending 2009. This three
year cumulative loss position is primarily attributable to
significant provisions for loan losses incurred and currently
forecasted during the three years ending 2009 and losses
realized during 2008 on its FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock
holdings. The Companys current financial forecasts
indicate that taxable income will be generated in the future.
However, the existing deferred tax benefits may not be fully
realized due to statutory limitations on their utilization based
on the Companys planned capital restructuring. The
creation and subsequent addition to the valuation allowance,
although it increased tax expense for the second
88
and third quarters and similarly reduced tangible book values,
did not have an effect on the Companys cash flows. The
remaining net deferred tax assets of $4.1 million are
supported by available tax planning strategies. The Company
expects valuation allowance adjustments equal to any tax expense
or benefits earned; therefore, it expects an effective rate of
0% in the near term.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company liquidated its
$85.8 million investment in bank owned life insurance in
order to reduce the Companys investment risk and its
risk-weighted assets which favorably impacted the Banks
regulatory capital ratios. The $16.3 million increase in
cash surrender value of the policies since the time of purchase
was treated as ordinary income for tax purposes. Additionally, a
10% IRS excise tax was incurred as a result of the liquidation.
As a result, the Company recorded federal tax expense of
$6.9 million and an additional state tax expense of
$1.2 million in the second quarter of 2009 for this
transaction.
Financial
Condition at September 30, 2009
The Company has improved the quality of the Banks balance
sheet over the past two quarters through building of loan loss
reserves, repositioning of the securities portfolio to provide a
high level of liquidity and re-assessing the valuation of its
deferred tax assets, while maintaining the Banks
regulatory capital ratios as the Company executes a complex and
comprehensive Capital Plan.
Set forth below are balance sheet highlights at
September 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets decreased $26.1 million at September 30,
2009 compared to year end 2008 and were down $39.2 million
compared to September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents increased $264.4 million at
September 30, 2009 compared to year end 2008 and were up
$214.0 million compared to September 30, 2008
improving the liquidity position.
|
|
|
|
Total loans decreased $55.7 million to $2.5 billion at
September 30, 2009 compared to year end 2008 and by
$40.1 million over the third quarter of 2008, partly due to
stricter underwriting standards and charge-offs.
|
|
|
|
The $85.8 million investment in bank owned life insurance
was liquidated during the second quarter of 2009 in order to
reduce the Companys investment risk and the Banks
regulatory capital requirement.
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009, the Company established a valuation
allowance of $60.0 million against its existing net
deferred tax assets. The Company increased the valuation
allowance by $16.9 million to $76.9 million against
its existing net deferred tax assets during the third quarter of
2009.
|
|
|
|
Deposits increased by $142.4 million to $2.6 billion
at September 30, 2009 compared to year end 2008 and
increased by $42.2 million when compared to
September 30, 2008, mainly as a result of successful
certificate of deposit promotions.
|
Set forth below are asset quality highlights at
September 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
The downturn in the commercial and residential real estate
markets continued to have a material negative impact on the
Companys loan portfolio, resulting in a significant
deterioration in credit quality and an increase in loan losses
and its allowance for loan losses. The Company believes it is
likely that the credit quality of its loan portfolio will
further deteriorate through the end of 2009.
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans were 7.90% of total loans at September 30,
2009, up from 2.43% of total loans at year end and 2.42% at
September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed properties increased from $12.0 million at year
end to $21.0 million at September 30, 2009, mainly due
to the foreclosure action on three large loan relationships.
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
Loan delinquencies of
30-89 days
were 3.24% of loans at September 30, 2009, up from 1.03% at
December 31, 2008 and 0.99% at September 30, 2008, due
to the continued deterioration of economic conditions.
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets were 6.06% of total assets at
September 30, 2009, up from 2.36% at year end and 1.91% at
September 30, 2008, as a result of the increase in
nonaccrual loans and foreclosed properties.
|
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses was 3.40% of total loans as of
September 30, 2009, versus 1.77% at year end 2008 and 1.58%
at September 30, 2008, due to a $69.7 million
provision in the first nine months of 2009 with net charge-offs
of $30.6 million during that period.
|
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans ratio was
43.07% at September 30, 2009, 72.72% at year end, and
65.20% for the corresponding period of 2008.
|
Loans
Average total loans decreased $79.6 million during the
third quarter of 2009. From June 30, 2009 to
September 30, 2009, loans outstanding declined
$105.2 million, primarily due to stricter underwriting
standards. Average loans yielded 5.32% in the third quarter of
2009, compared to 5.47% in the second quarter of 2009, with 82%
of all loans tied to prime having interest rate floors in place
and 78% of those loans currently at their floors.
The following table sets forth the composition of the
Companys loan portfolio on a source of repayment basis as
of the indicated dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
1,045,533
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,090,078
|
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
324,074
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
366,178
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
744,464
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
729,729
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
227,966
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
194,673
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
5,583
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
107,124
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
123,161
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross
|
|
|
2,454,744
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,510,151
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
$
|
2,454,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,509,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans decreased $55.7 million at September 30,
2009 from December 31, 2008. Total loans decreased by
$105.2 million from the second quarter of 2009. Set forth
below are other highlights of the loan portfolio. The Company
expects to see continued portfolio declines in the near term due
to its emphasis on underwriting and pricing discipline begun in
the second quarter of 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans decreased $44.5 million to
$1.0 billion as of September 30, 2009 from
December 31, 2008 and comprise 42.6% of the loan portfolio.
|
|
|
|
Construction loans decreased by $42.1 million to
$324.1 million, or 13.2% of the loan portfolio, as of
September 30, 2009 from $366.2 million and 14.6% at
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans increased by $14.7 million to
$744.5 million, or 30.3% of the loan portfolio, as of
September 30, 2009 from $729.7 million and 29.1% at
year end.
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans increased by $33.3 million to
$228.0 million, or 9.3% of the loan portfolio, as of
September 30, 2009 from $194.7 million at year end.
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans decreased by $16.0 million to
$107.1 million as of September 30, 2009 from
$123.2 million at year end.
|
|
|
|
The Company does not hold any
sub-prime
loans in its residential mortgage portfolio.
|
Allowance
for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses has been established to provide
for those loans that may not be repaid in their entirety for a
variety of reasons. The allowance is maintained at a level
considered by management to be adequate to provide for probable
incurred losses. The allowance is increased by provisions
charged to earnings and is reduced by charge-offs, net of
recoveries. The provision for loan losses is based upon past
loan loss experience and managements evaluation of the
loan portfolio under current economic conditions. Loans are
charged to the allowance for loan losses when, and to the
extent, they are deemed by management to be uncollectible. The
allowance for loan losses is comprised of allocations for
specific loans and a historical loss based portion for all other
loans.
Following is a summary of activity in the allowance for loan
losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
63,893
|
|
|
$
|
22,606
|
|
|
$
|
44,432
|
|
|
$
|
26,748
|
|
Provision charged to operations
|
|
|
36,700
|
|
|
|
41,950
|
|
|
|
69,700
|
|
|
|
51,765
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(17,723
|
)
|
|
|
(25,224
|
)
|
|
|
(32,268
|
)
|
|
|
(40,472
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
1,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off
|
|
|
(17,087
|
)
|
|
|
(25,128
|
)
|
|
|
(30,626
|
)
|
|
|
(39,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at end of period
|
|
$
|
83,506
|
|
|
$
|
39,428
|
|
|
$
|
83,506
|
|
|
$
|
39,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded a provision for loan losses of
$36.7 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009 reflecting managements assessment of impaired loans,
specific reserves associated with loans identified as impaired
during the quarter, the migration of loans not specifically
analyzed for impairment into higher credit risk rating
categories, and the continued deterioration of economic
conditions.
A provision for loan losses of $69.7 million was taken for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
$51.8 million for the similar period in 2008, reflecting
managements updated assessments of impaired loans and the
continued deterioration of economic conditions. The Company had
net charge-offs of $30.6 million for the first nine months
of 2009 compared to $39.1 million for the same period in
2008.
The Company had a reserve for losses on unfunded commitments of
$2.1 million at September 30, 2009, up from
$1.1 million at December 31, 2008 and $793,000 at
September 30, 2008.
The following table sets forth certain asset quality ratios
related to the allowance for loan losses on a
quarter-to-date
basis as of the indicated dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
Net loans charged off to average loans during quarter
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
|
|
2.39
|
%
|
|
|
3.98
|
%
|
Provision for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
5.93
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
|
6.69
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
Allowance to nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
0.43
|
x
|
|
|
0.73
|
x
|
|
|
0.65
|
x
|
The Company recognizes that credit losses will be experienced
and the risk of loss will vary with, among other things; general
economic conditions; the type of loan being made; the
creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan; and
in the case of a collateralized loan, the quality of the
collateral. The allowance for loan losses represents the
Companys estimate of the amount deemed necessary to
provide for probable losses existing in the portfolio. In making
this determination, the Company analyzes the ultimate
collectibility
91
of the loans in its portfolio by incorporating feedback provided
by internal loan staff. Each loan officer grades his or her
individual commercial credits and the Companys loan review
personnel independently review the officers grades.
In the event that the loan is downgraded during this review, the
loan is included in the allowance analysis at the lower grade.
On a quarterly basis, management of the Bank meets to review the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
Estimating the amount of the allowance for loan losses requires
significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the
amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired
loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on
historical loss experience, and consideration of current
economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible
to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the
largest asset type on the consolidated balance sheet. Loan
losses are charged off against the allowance, while recoveries
of amounts previously charged off are credited to the allowance.
A provision for loan losses is charged to operations based on
managements periodic evaluation of the factors previously
mentioned, as well as other pertinent factors.
The Companys methodology for determining the allowance for
loan losses represents an estimation performed pursuant to the
authoritative guidance for contingencies (ASC 450) and loan
impairments (ASC
310-10-35).
The allowance reflects expected losses resulting from analyses
developed through specific credit allocations for individual
loans and historical loss experience for each loan category. The
specific credit allocations are based on regular analyses of all
loans over $300,000 where the internal credit rating is at or
below a predetermined classification. These analyses involve a
high degree of judgment in estimating the amount of loss
associated with specific loans, including estimating the amount
and timing of future cash flows and collateral values. The
allowance for loan losses also includes consideration of
concentrations, changes in portfolio mix and volume, loan risk
ratings and other qualitative factors.
During the third quarter of 2009, steps were taken to improve
the credit review function. The Company strengthened its
portfolio review process, tracking of credit trends and
documentation of exceptions. The Company devoted additional
resources to its loan workout unit and engaged an independent
firm to actively manage problem loans.
With the additional resources devoted to the loan workout area,
management has sharpened its understanding of the factors
impacting the primary and secondary sources of repayment and
collateral support, and has used this information in the risk
ratings and other classifications utilized in the computation of
the allowance for loan losses. In determining loan specific
reserves in the allowance for loan losses, the Company generally
assigns average discounts of
20-35%
to
independent appraisal values, dependent upon loan and collateral
type. These discount rates have been adjusted upward in recent
periods based upon the rapid deterioration in the current
Chicago commercial real estate market. As a result, although the
Companys allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
ratio dropped to 43% as of September 30, 2009, from a range
of
58-62%
during December 2008 through June 2009, specific reserves to
loans analyzed for possible impairment increased to 20% from 7%
as of December 31, 2008 and 15% as of June 30, 2009.
In the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a provision
for loan losses of $36.7 million and recognized net loan
charge-offs totaling $17.1 million. Nonaccrual loans
increased $98.9 million compared to the prior quarter to
$193.9 million, or 7.9 percent of loans. As nonaccrual
loans have increased throughout 2009, the provision for loan
losses has been double net charge-offs for each quarter
reflecting this deterioration and the ratio of allowance for
loan losses to loans increased significantly to 3.40% at
September 30, 2009, from 2.50% at June 30, 2009 and
1.58% at September 30, 2008.
Management computes and provides to the Board of Directors
various allowance for loan loss and other credit quality ratios
as one tool to assist in comparing and understanding changes
from previous periods and to the relative performance of its
peers. These reviews are performed to better understand changes
in credit quality over time and to determine the reasonableness
of the level of the allowance for loan losses. Although these
ratios provide useful benchmarks, this analysis is just one tool
used to determine that the level of the allowance for loan
losses is adequate.
92
There are many factors affecting the allowance for loan losses;
some are quantitative while others require qualitative judgment.
The process for determining the allowance (which management
believes adequately considers all of the factors which
potentially result in credit losses) includes subjective
elements and, therefore, the allowance may be susceptible to
significant change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from
management estimates, additional provisions for loan losses
could be required that may adversely affect the Companys
earnings or financial position in future periods.
Key lending personnel have been re-assigned to the
Companys special assets (loan workout) group in the second
quarter of 2009. The Bank has devoted additional resources to
its workout unit and engaged an independent firm to actively
manage problem loans.
Nonaccrual
Loans and Nonperforming Assets
Nonaccrual loans increased by $132.8 million to
$193.9 million at September 30, 2009 from
December 31, 2008. Nonperforming assets were
$214.9 million at September 30, 2009 compared to
$84.1 million at December 31, 2008. The Company had
$11.0 million in troubled-debt restructuring to one
borrower as of December 31, 2008 which went to nonaccrual
status during the third quarter of 2009.
The following table sets forth information on the Companys
nonaccrual loans and nonperforming assets as of the indicated
dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
$
|
23,653
|
|
|
$
|
3,559
|
|
|
$
|
13,038
|
|
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied
|
|
|
56,715
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
26,836
|
|
Commercial real estate owner occupied
|
|
|
22,423
|
|
|
|
14,244
|
|
|
|
17,611
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
55,920
|
|
|
|
20,726
|
|
|
|
24,444
|
|
Vacant land
|
|
|
24,962
|
|
|
|
6,550
|
|
|
|
5,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and commercial real estate
|
|
|
183,673
|
|
|
|
55,389
|
|
|
|
87,385
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
8,032
|
|
|
|
5,315
|
|
|
|
5,584
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
10,204
|
|
|
|
5,715
|
|
|
|
7,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
193,877
|
|
|
|
61,104
|
|
|
|
95,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trouble debt restructured loans (commercial real
estate non-owner occupied)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,006
|
|
|
|
11,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
|
193,877
|
|
|
|
72,110
|
|
|
|
106,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
20,980
|
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
|
|
19,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
214,857
|
|
|
$
|
84,128
|
|
|
$
|
125,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to loans
|
|
|
7.90
|
%
|
|
|
2.43
|
%
|
|
|
3.71
|
%
|
Nonperforming assets to loans and foreclosed properties
|
|
|
8.68
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
|
Nonperforming assets to assets
|
|
|
6.06
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
3.52
|
|
There were no impaired and other loans 90 days past due and
accruing at September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, or
September 30, 2008.
Nonaccrual commercial loans increased by $20.1 million from
December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009, in part due
to the following relationships:
|
|
|
|
|
a $6.2 million loan relationship secured by business assets
and retail and office buildings to a company that markets to
real estate agents and brokers;
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
a $6.5 million loan to a company that markets to real
estate agents and brokers that has been negatively affected by
the real estate downturn;
|
|
|
|
a $2.8 million loan relationship with an energy company
currently operating under a forbearance agreement;
|
|
|
|
a $2.8 million loan relationship with a full-service
tradeshow display company where the recent death of the
principal caused a disruption in its business operations. This
borrower is currently operating under a forbearance agreement;
|
|
|
|
a $2.8 million ($0.6 million commercial and industrial
and $2.2 million commercial real estate) loan relationship
with a full-service tradeshow display company secured by
business assets where the recent death of the principal caused a
disruption in its business operations. This borrower is
currently operating under a forbearance agreement; and
|
|
|
|
a $0.8 million loan relationship secured by retail and
office properties to a banker.
|
Nonaccrual commercial real estate and construction loans
increased by $108.2 million from December 31, 2008 to
September 30, 2009, due in large part to the following
relationships:
|
|
|
|
|
a $12.6 million loan relationship related to a construction
project for several projects in and near Lake County, Illinois;
|
|
|
|
a $11.0 million loan relationship with collateral located
in a western suburb of Chicago, consisting of improved lots on
25 acres. The property value has declined and there are
currently no units under contract. The guarantors have limited
liquidity and net worth and continue efforts to raise equity to
fund the real estate investment;
|
|
|
|
a $9.5 million loan relationship that consists of several
loans for various commercial properties in Cook County,
Illinois. Third party real estate management and marketing firms
have been engaged by the borrower. The management company is
focusing on stabilizing buildings, renewing leases and seeking
new tenants. The properties securing the loans have experienced
increased vacancies and resulting decreases in operating income
to provide sufficient cash flow to meet contractual loan
payments. The guarantor has limited liquidity;
|
|
|
|
a $8.6 million loan relationship secured with 26 acres
of property on in McHenry County. The borrowers plans to
sell portions of the property have taken longer than expected.
The guarantor adds only limited financial support;
|
|
|
|
a $6.5 million loan relationship, of which
$2.5 million has been charged off, secured with a project
located in Cook County experiencing slow sales. The properties
securing the loans have not sold with the borrower now renting
properties at a level that is not sufficient to meet contractual
loan payments. There are multiple guarantors who have limited
liquidity;
|
|
|
|
a $5.3 million loan relationship secured with property
where the development has stalled and the guarantor is
considering alternative strategies to sell or liquidate the
assets. The guarantor is currently providing contractual
payments; however, in the future their liquidity position will
no longer enable them to continue to meet loan repayment terms;
|
|
|
|
a $4.9 million loan relationship to a residential
homebuilder originated in 2003 for a commercial property in a
western suburb of Chicago which has been stalled due to on-going
litigation with the local municipality. Total credit exposure to
this customer is $8.6 million;
|
|
|
|
a $4.1 million loan relationship secured by three single
family residences with a contractor for the development of those
properties in northern suburbs of Chicago which have been slow
to sell; and
|
|
|
|
a $2.4 million ($1.5 million commercial real estate
and $0.9 million vacant land) loan relationship secured by
single and multi-family residences and vacant land impacted by
local economic conditions.
|
94
In addition to the loans summarized above, at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had
$74.8 million and $71.0 million of loans that are
currently performing, which, however, have been internally
assigned higher credit risk ratings. The higher risk ratings are
primarily due to internally identified specific or collective
credit characteristics including decreased capacity to repay
loan obligations due to adverse market conditions, a lack of
borrower or guarantors capital capacity and reduced
collateral valuations securing the loans as a secondary source
of repayment. These loans continue to accrue interest.
Management does not expect losses on these loans, but recognizes
that a higher level of scrutiny is prudent under the
circumstances.
Foreclosed properties were $21.0 million at
September 30, 2009, an increase of $9.0 million
compared to year end mainly due to three new properties:
$5.1 million related to multiple properties including
vacant land parcels and an office building, $995,000 related to
residential property, and $913,000 related to commercial and
residential properties. Certain foreclosed properties were
written down to current fair value less costs to sell during the
third quarter of 2009 and a corresponding charge of
$2.6 million was recorded in foreclosed properties expense.
Securities
The Company manages its securities portfolio to provide a source
of both liquidity and earnings. The investment policy is
developed in conjunction with established asset/liability
committee directives. The investment policy is reviewed by
senior management of the Company in terms of its objectives,
investment guidelines and consistency with overall Company
performance and risk management goals. The investment policy is
formally reviewed and approved annually by the Board of
Directors. The asset/liability committee of is responsible for
reporting and monitoring compliance with the investment policy.
Reports are provided to the asset/liability committee and the
Board of Directors of the Company on a regular basis.
The following tables set forth the composition of the
Companys securities portfolio by major category as of
September 30, 2009. No securities classified as
held-to-maturity
were held at September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
451,785
|
|
|
$
|
451,792
|
|
|
|
73.1
|
%
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential(1)
|
|
|
147,043
|
|
|
|
147,003
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities(2)
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities(3)
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
14,979
|
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
618,551
|
|
|
$
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes obligations of FHLMC.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
Securities
available-for-sale
are carried at fair value, with related unrealized net gains or
losses, net of deferred income taxes, recorded as an adjustment
to other comprehensive loss. At September 30, 2009,
unrealized losses on securities
available-for-sale
were $3.0 million compared to unrealized losses of
$2.4 million, or $1.4 million net of taxes, at
December 31, 2008. A deferred income tax adjustment to the
carrying value was not recorded as a result of the
Companys tax position at September 30, 2009.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company repositioned its
securities portfolio to lower capital requirements associated
with higher risk-weighted assets, restructure expected cash
flows, reduce credit risk,
95
and enhance the Banks asset sensitivity. The Company sold
$538.1 million of its securities portfolio with an average
yield of 3.94% and average life of slightly over two years. The
securities sold included U.S. government-sponsored entities
debentures, mortgage-backed securities, and municipal bonds.
These securities were sold in the open market at a net gain of
$4.3 million. The Company purchased $571.0 million of
U.S. Treasury bills and Government National Mortgage Association
mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on these
securities is 0.43% with an average life of less than six
months. The Company reinvested and will continue to reinvest
into higher-yielding securities as opportunities present
themselves.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company still held
$27.6 million in five securities, including municipal bonds
and U.S. government-sponsored entities mortgage-backed
securities, that were ear-marked for sale under this portfolio
repositioning program. Consistent with that program and the
Companys stated intent to sell these securities, and the
Company recognized a $740,000
other-than-temporary
impairment charge during the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company continued to hold two
of the five securities with balances totaling $2.0 million,
which included a municipal bond and a mortgage-backed security
of a U.S. government-sponsored entity that were identified
for sale under this portfolio repositioning program, which were
not impaired as of that date. The three securities sold during
the third quarter resulted in a net gain of $136,000.
During the second quarter of 2009, as a part of its
repositioning program, the Company sold its entire portfolio of
securities
held-to-maturity
of $27.7 million at a net gain of $117,000.
Securities
available-for-sale
decreased by $6.4 million to $615.5 million at
September 30, 2009 from December 31, 2008. Set forth
below are other highlights of the securities portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and obligations of
U.S. government-sponsored entities increased by
$186.4 million to $451.8 million, or 73.1% of the
portfolio, at September 30, 2009 compared to
$265.4 million at year end. At September 30, 2009, the
Companys holdings in this category consisted of only
U.S. Treasury bills with maturities of less than four
months.
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored entity
mortgage-backed securities decreased $134.9 million, from
$283.7 million at December 31, 2008 to
$148.8 million at September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Equity securities increased $2.9 million to
$3.9 million at September 30, 2009 from
December 31, 2008 as a result of the increase in fair
market value.
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities decreased by
$4.4 million to $10.9 million at September 30,
2009 from $15.2 million at December 31, 2008 as a
result of a sale transaction.
|
|
|
|
The securities portfolio does not contain any
sub-prime
or
Alt-A mortgage-backed securities.
|
Certain
available-for-sale
securities were temporarily impaired at September 30, 2009,
primarily due to changes in interest rates as well as current
economic conditions that appear to be cyclical in nature. With
respect to the largest unrealized loss position, the Company has
approximately 155.8% senior collateral coverage related to
this security. The unrealized losses on equity securities relate
to the preferred equity securities issued by FNMA which were
rated Ca and C by Moodys and S&P, respectively, as of
September 30, 2009. The dividend on these equity securities
were suspended beginning in late 2008.
The Company does not intend to sell nor would it be required to
sell the temporarily impaired securities before recovering their
amortized cost. See Note 5 Securities to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements for more details.
Cash
Surrender Value of Life Insurance
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company liquidated its
entire $85.8 million investment in bank owned life
insurance in order to reduce the Companys investment risk
and risk-weighted assets, which favorably impacted the
Banks regulatory capital ratios. The $16.3 million
increase in cash surrender value of the policies since the time
of purchase was treated as ordinary income for tax purposes.
Additionally, a 10%
96
IRS excise tax was incurred as a result of the liquidation. The
Company recorded a tax expense of $8.1 million in the
second quarter of 2009 for this transaction.
Goodwill
Goodwill was $78.9 million at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008. Consistent with established policy, an
annual review for goodwill impairment as of September 30,
2009 was conducted with the assistance of a nationally
recognized third party valuation specialist. Based upon that
review, the Company determined that the $78.9 million
goodwill recorded on the September 30, 2009 balance sheet
was not impaired.
As a result of our previous annual test performed at
September 30, 2008, the Company determined goodwill was
impaired and recorded an $80.0 million impairment to reduce
the goodwill balance to $78.9 million. Under the
authoritative guidance for intangibles goodwill and
other (ASC 350), a goodwill impairment test could be triggered
between annual testing dates if an event occurred or
circumstances changed that would more likely than not reduce the
fair value of goodwill below the carrying amount. During each of
the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009,
management considered whether events and circumstances would
require an interim test of goodwill impairment. Management
concluded that it was not more likely than not that these events
and changes in circumstances, both individually and in the
aggregate, reduced the fair value of the Companys single
reporting unit below its carrying amount. Managements
analysis was based on and considered changes in the key
indicators and inputs consistent with those included in our
previous annual review such as stock price, estimated control
premium, future available cash flows, market multiples, business
strategy, credit quality metrics, loan growth, core deposits and
regulatory capital requirements along with interest rates,
credit spreads and collateral values.
Following is a summary of the methodologies employed to conduct
the Companys testing at September 30, 2009, the
underlying assumptions and related rationale in the context of
current facts and circumstances, and how the methodologies
employed compared with those used in the prior year test.
The Company operates in one operating segment, community
banking, as defined in the authoritative guidance for segment
reporting (ASC 280) and currently does not internally
report its operating income below that level or provide such
information to its CEO, the companys chief operating
decision maker. For this reason, the Company performs its
goodwill impairment test as one reporting unit at the
consolidated Company level.
The methods for estimating the value of the Company under Step 1
of the goodwill impairment test included a weighted average of
the discounted cash flow method, the guideline company method
and the guideline transaction method. The discounted cash flow
method computes the discounted value of both projected annual
cash flows and an assumed terminal value. The guideline company
and guideline transaction methods use publicly available
information on selected peer banks and recent sales of
controlling interests in comparable banks to estimate the fair
value of the Company. This process allows the Company to
determine an appropriate implied control premium which serves to
adjust the Companys market capitalization to an estimated
fair value utilized in connection with the Companys annual
goodwill impairment evaluation. The Company used the discounted
cash flow method under the income approach weighted at 50%, the
guideline public company method weighted at 30% and the
guideline transaction method weighted at 20%. The weightings
were determined by professional judgment based upon the relative
strengths of each of the three methods as it relates to the
quality and quantity of available and verifiable information.
Management worked closely with the third party valuation
specialist throughout the valuation process. Management provided
necessary information to this third party and reviewed the
methodologies and assumptions used including loan and deposit
growth, regulatory capital requirements and the Companys
business strategy.
A reconciliation was performed of the fair value estimate to the
Companys publicly traded market capitalization using the
thirty day average closing prices of its common and preferred
stock through the valuation date. The implied control premium
derived by comparing the Companys market capitalization to
the Step 1 fair value estimate was determined to be within a
reasonable range of actual control premiums observed
97
in recently completed transactions in an industry peer group.
The results of this reconciliation supported the reasonableness
of the fair value estimate used in the goodwill impairment test.
In Step 1 of the analysis, it was determined that the fair value
estimate was less than the carrying value of the single
reporting unit. However, in Step 2 of the test it was determined
that the decline in the fair value was attributable to a decline
in the fair values of the assets of the single reporting unit
and an increase in the fair values of liabilities, not to a
decline in the value of the goodwill. In general, as a result of
the Step 2 analysis, management concluded the decrease in the
fair value is primarily attributable to prolonged weak economic
conditions and the impact these conditions have had on the fair
value of the Companys loan portfolio and decreases in
market interest rates.. The decline in interest rates caused the
increase in the fair value of borrowings structured in previous
periods when market interest rates were higher. These two
factors more than account for the drop in the Companys
fair value, leaving goodwill unimpaired. A discussion of the
Step 2 test assumptions, methods and results is presented below.
In Step 2 of the test, the Company estimated the fair value of
assets and liabilities in the same manner as if a purchase of
the reporting unit was taking place from a market participant
perspective, which includes estimating the fair value of other
intangibles. The fair value estimation methodology selected for
the Companys most significant assets and liabilities was
based on the Companys observations and knowledge of
methodologies typically and currently utilized by market
participants, the structure and characteristics of the asset and
liability in terms of cash flows and collateral, and the
availability and reliability of significant inputs required for
a selected methodology and comparative data to evaluate the
outcomes. Specifically, the Company selected the income approach
for performing loans, retail certificates of deposit, core
deposit intangibles, and borrowings, and the market approach for
branch properties. The Company estimated fair values separately
for nonaccrual loans and loans
60-89 days
past due. The income approach was deemed appropriate for the
assets and liabilities noted above due to the limited current
comparable market transaction data available. The market
approach was deemed appropriate for the branch properties and
foreclosed properties due to the nature of the underlying real
and personal property. In Step 2, the Company did not use
multiple approaches to estimate the fair value of any given
asset or liability category; therefore, no weightings were
incorporated into the Companys methodology in this step.
Net loans were $2.4 billion or 66.9% of Company assets as
of September 30, 2009. The estimated fair value of net
loans was $86.8 million or 3.7% below book value. In
computing this estimated fair value, performing loans were
separated into fixed and variable components, floors and
collateral coverage ratios were considered, and appropriate
comparable market discount rates were used to compute fair
values using a discounted cash flow approach. A 40% discount was
applied to nonaccrual loans based upon recent Company charge-off
experience and a 10% discount was applied to loans
60-89 days
past due and accruing.
The core deposit intangible asset fair value was estimated by
computing the expected future cost savings from holding low cost
deposits and resulted in a fair value estimate
$12.3 million above book value. Estimated fair value for
the Companys branch facilities was $7.1 million above
book value based upon values determined from the most recent
appraisals received adjusted for estimated property value
declines from appraisal dates to September 30, 2009.
The fair values of the Companys liabilities were estimated
using price estimates from a nationally known dealer for 82% of
borrowings, and discounted cash flows reflecting the effects of
credit spreads for the remaining borrowings and time and
brokered deposits. The fair value estimate for all liabilities
was $41.3 million above book carrying value. Time and
brokered deposits were determined to have a net fair value
$14.7 million over book carrying value and borrowings
accounted for the remaining $26.6 million.
Although Step 1 of the impairment test showed the fair value of
stockholders equity was $88.2 million below the book
carrying value, thereby requiring Step 2 testing, the Step 2
results indicated the estimated fair values of other assets and
liabilities net were $113.0 million below the book carrying
amounts and therefore none of that decrease was attributable to
the $78.6 million of goodwill on the books as of at
September 30, 2009.
98
Material assumptions used in the fair value estimate include
projected earnings, projected balance sheet and capital levels,
effective tax rates, market discount rates, terminal residual
values, composition of market comparables and the weighting of
computational method results in Step 1 testing. Changes in any
of these assumptions can have a material effect on the fair
value used in the goodwill impairment evaluation. In particular,
changes in projected earnings and market bank stock levels have
a material effect on the Step 1 estimated fair values. As a
financial institution, the fair value estimates in Step 2 are
extremely sensitive to changes in market interest rates and
credit spreads, especially on the values of longer term fixed
rate assets and liabilities. As noted above, net loans
represented 66.9% of total assets as of September 30, 2009.
Using the September 30, 2009 impairment study values, a 1%
change in loan fair values up or down due to market interest
rates or changes in credit spreads would change the net loan
fair value by $23.7 million. Core deposit intangible fair
values increase with increases in market interest rates. The
fair value of long term borrowings with fixed interest rates
increases as market rates decline and decreases as market rates
increase.
The assumptions and methodologies used for annual goodwill
impairment testing for September 30, 2009 as discussed
above, were similar to those used in the prior year and the same
third party valuation specialist was used; however, since
interest rates continued to decline, credit spreads had widened
and asset quality had materially changed, the evaluation of loan
fair values was more granular and involved segregating the loan
balances into much finer groups for valuation purposes including
segregating
60-89 day
past due loans and assigning a 10% discount rate on them.
In the fourth quarter of 2009 the Company will perform another
goodwill impairment test if, in its assessment, it determines
any events have occurred or circumstances have changed
(triggering events) during that quarter that would more likely
than not reduce the fair value of goodwill below the carrying
amount.
Deposits
and Borrowed Funds
The following table sets forth the composition of the
Companys deposits as of the indicated dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand
|
|
$
|
330,901
|
|
|
$
|
334,495
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
|
176,597
|
|
|
|
176,224
|
|
Money-market
|
|
|
206,653
|
|
|
|
208,484
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
134,539
|
|
|
|
129,101
|
|
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000
|
|
|
878,695
|
|
|
|
689,896
|
|
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more
|
|
|
403,149
|
|
|
|
435,687
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit
|
|
|
424,655
|
|
|
|
438,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,224,288
|
|
|
|
2,078,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,555,189
|
|
|
$
|
2,412,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits(1)
|
|
$
|
848,690
|
|
|
$
|
848,304
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand,
money market, and savings.
|
Total deposits of $2.6 billion at September 30, 2009
represented an increase of $142.4 million, or 5.9%, from
December 31, 2008. Changes in the Companys deposits
are noted below.
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits were $330.9 million at
September 30, 2009, $3.6 million less than the
$334.5 million level at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits increased 7.0%, or $146.0 million
to $2.2 billion at September 30, 2009 compared to
December 31, 2008.
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposits, which consist of noninterest-bearing demand,
interest-bearing demand, money market, and savings, increased
slightly to $848.7 million at September 30, 2009 from
$848.3 million at December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit under $100,000 increased
$188.8 million, or 27.4%, from December 31, 2008 to
$878.7 million at September 30, 2009, as a result of
successful promotions which allowed the Company to build
liquidity.
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit over $100,000 decreased by
$32.5 million from December 31, 2008 to
$403.1 million at September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposits through the CDARS and Internet networks
were $139.0 million at September 30, 2009 compared to
$41.6 million at December 31, 2008. These networks
allow the Company to access other deposit funding sources.
|
|
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit decreased $14.2 million,
or 3.2%, to $424.7 million at September 30, 2009
compared to year end 2008. The brokered certificates of deposit
are comprised of underlying certificates of deposits in
denominations of less than $100,000.
|
The Company continues to participate in the FDICs
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. This program consists of
two components. The first is the Transaction Account Guarantee
Program where all noninterest-bearing transaction deposit
accounts, including all personal and business checking deposit
accounts, and NOW accounts, which are capped at a rate no higher
than 0.50%, are fully guaranteed, through June 30, 2010,
regardless of dollar amount. All other deposit accounts continue
to be covered by the FDICs expanded deposit insurance
limit of $250,000 through December 31, 2013. The second
component is the Debt Guarantee Program, which guarantees newly
issued senior unsecured debt. The Company has not issued any
such debt and currently does not plan to issue, any such debt.
In 2009, the FDIC increased premium assessments to maintain
adequate funding of the Deposit Insurance Fund. Assessment rates
set by the FDIC, effective March 1, 2009, generally range
from 12 to 45 basis points; however, these rates may be
adjusted upward or downward if the institution has unsecured
debt or secured liabilities. As a result, assessment rates for
institutions may range from 7 basis points to
77.5 basis points. These increases in premium assessments
increased the Companys expenses.
On May 22, 2009, the FDIC board agreed to impose an
emergency special assessment of 5 basis points on all banks
(based on June 30, 2009 assets) to restore the Deposit
Insurance Fund to an acceptable level. The assessment, which was
paid on September 30, 2009, is in addition to the increase
in premiums discussed above. The cost of this emergency special
assessment to the Company was $1.7 million. On
November 12, 2009, the FDIC issued new assessment
regulation that require FDIC-insured institutions to prepay on
December 30, 2009 their estimated quarterly risk-based
assessments for the fourth quarter 2009 and for all of 2010,
2011 and 2012; however certain financial institutions, including
the Bank, were exempted from the new prepayment regulations and
will continue to pay their risk-based assessments on a quarterly
basis. The Company expects its FDIC insurance expense to
increase by approximately $600,000 quarterly starting in the
fourth quarter of 2009.
The Company competes for core deposits in the highly competitive
Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area. Competitive pricing has
made it difficult to maintain and grow these types of deposits.
The level of competition for core deposits is not expected to
ease in the near term. The Companys recent campaigns
include certificates of deposit promotions and core product
promotions. The Company continues to pursue on-line account
opening process to facilitate the growth of core deposit
relationships.
100
Borrowed funds are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
$
|
8,600
|
|
|
$
|
8,600
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
777,078
|
|
|
$
|
817,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company utilizes securities sold under repurchase agreements
as a source of funds that do not increase the Companys
reserve requirements. The Company had $297.7 million in
securities sold under repurchase agreements at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. These
repurchase agreements are with primary dealers and have fixed
rates ranging from 2.76% to 4.65% and maturities of
approximately eight to nine years with call provisions ranging
from three months to one year. The Company has collateralized
the repurchase agreements with various securities totaling
$365.6 million at September 30, 2009.
In addition, the repurchase agreements with one of the
repurchase agreement counterparties permit that counterparty to
terminate the repurchase agreements if the Bank does not
maintain its well-capitalized status. At September 30,
2009, the repurchase agreements with those provisions totaled
$262.7 million with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.76%
to 4.65%, maturities ranging from approximately 7.5 to
8.5 years, and call provisions (at the counterpartys
option) ranging from three months to one year. Due to the
relatively high fixed rates on these borrowings as compared to
currently low market rates of interest, the Bank would incur
substantial costs to unwind these repurchase agreements if
terminated prior to their maturities. Accordingly, if the Bank
does not maintain its well-capitalized status and the
counterparty exercises its option to terminate one or more of
these repurchase agreements prior to maturity, the associated
unwind costs could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations and financial condition.
The Bank is a member of the FHLB. At September 30, 2009,
total FHLB advances were $340.0 million compared to
$380.0 million at year end. Such advances have fixed rates
ranging from 2.45% to 4.47% and maturities ranging from
approximately eight to nine years and various call provisions
ranging from three months to two years. The Company has
collateralized the advances with various securities totaling
$115.0 million and first mortgage and home equity loans
totaling $237.5 million at September 30, 2009.
Revolving
and Term Loan Facilities; Events of Default
The Companys credit agreements with a correspondent bank
at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted
of a revolving line of credit, a term note, and a subordinated
debenture in the amounts of $8.6 million,
$55.0 million, and $15.0 million, respectively.
The revolving line of credit had a maximum availability of
$8.6 million, an outstanding balance of $8.6 million
as of September 30, 2009, an interest rate at
September 30, 2009 of one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis
points with an interest rate floor of 7.25%, and matured on
July 3, 2009. The term note had an interest rate of
one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis points at September 30,
2009 and matures on September 28, 2010. The subordinated
debt had an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 350 basis
points at September 30, 2009, matures on March 31,
2018, and qualifies as Tier 2 capital.
The revolving line of credit and term note included the
following financial covenants at September 30, 2009:
(1) the Bank must not have nonperforming loans (loans on
nonaccrual status and 90 days or more past due and
troubled-debt restructured loans) in excess of 3.00% of total
loans, (2) the Bank must report a quarterly profit,
excluding charges related to acquisitions, and (3) the Bank
must remain well capitalized. At September 30, 2009, the
Company was in violation of financial covenants (the
Financial Covenant Defaults).
101
The Company did not make a required $5.0 million principal
payment on the term note due on July 1, 2009 under the
covenant waiver for the third quarter of 2008. On July 8,
2009, the lender advised the Company that such non-compliance
constitutes a continuing event of default under the loan
agreements (the Contingent Waiver Default). The
Companys decision not to make the $5.0 million
principal payment, together with its previously announced
decision to suspend the dividend on its Series A preferred
stock and defer the dividends on its Series T preferred
stock and interest payments on its trust preferred securities,
were made in order to retain cash and preserve liquidity and
capital at the holding company.
The revolving line of credit matured on July 3, 2009, and
the Company did not pay to the lender all of the aggregate
outstanding principal on the revolving line of credit on such
date. The failure to make such payment constitutes an additional
event of default under the credit agreements (the Payment
Default; the Contingent Wavier Default, the Financial
Covenant Defaults and the Payment Default are hereinafter
collectively referred to as the Existing Events of
Default).
As a result of the occurrence and the continuance of the
Existing Events of Default, the lender notified the Company
that, as of July 8, 2009, the interest rate on the
revolving line of credit increased to the default interest rate
of 7.25%, and the interest rate under the term note agreement
increased to the default interest rate of 30 day LIBOR plus
455 basis points. The Company also did not make a required
$5.0 million principal payment on the term note due on
October 1, 2009 under the covenant waiver for the third
quarter of 2008.
As a result, and as a result of the other Existing Events of
Default, the lender possesses certain rights and remedies,
including the ability to demand immediate payment of amounts due
totaling $63.6 million plus accrued interest or foreclose
on the collateral supporting the credit agreements, being 100%
of the stock of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, the
Bank.
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance
agreement (Forbearance Agreement) with its lender
that provides for a forbearance period through March 31,
2010, during which time the Company will continue to pursue
completion of its Capital Plan. Management believes that the
Forbearance Agreement provides the Company sufficient time to
complete all major elements of the Capital Plan; however there
can be no assurance that any or all major elements of the
Capital Plan will be completed in a timely manner or at all.
During the forbearance period, the Company is not obligated to
make interest and principal payments in excess of funds held in
a deposit security account (which will be funded with $325,000),
and while retaining all rights and remedies within the credit
agreements, the lender has agreed not to demand payment of
amounts due or begin foreclosure proceedings in respect of the
collateral (which consists primarily of all the stock of the
Bank), and has agreed to forbear from exercising the rights and
remedies available to it in respect of existing defaults and
future compliance with certain covenants through March 31,
2010. As part of the Forbearance Agreement, the Company entered
into a tax refund security agreement under which it agreed to
deliver to the lender the expected proceeds to be received in
connection with an outstanding Federal income tax refund in the
approximate amount of $2.1 million. These proceeds, when
received, will be placed in the deposit security account, and
will be available for interest and principal payments. The
Forbearance Agreement may terminate prior to March 31, 2010
if the Company defaults under any of its representations,
warranties or obligations contained in either the Forbearance
Agreement or credit agreements (other than with respect to
certain financial and regulatory covenants), or the Bank becomes
subject to receivership by the FDIC or the Company becomes
subject to other bankruptcy or insolvency type proceeding.
Although the lender is not exercising all of its rights and
remedies while the forbearance period is in effect (other than
continuing to impose default rates of interest), the lender has
not waived, or committed to waive, the Existing Events of
Default or any other default or event of default.
Upon the expiration of the forbearance period, the principal and
interest payments that were due under the revolving line of
credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers,
at the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into will once
again become due, along with such other amounts as may have
become due during the forbearance period. Absent successful
completion of a significant portion of the objectives under its
Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would not be able to
meet any demands from the lender for payment of amounts then due
at the expiration of the forbearance period, and the lender
would have the right to exercise the rights and remedies
available to it as a consequence, including foreclosing on the
102
shares of the Banks capital stock held by the Company,
which, if such an event were to occur, would have a material
adverse affect on the Companys business and results of
operations.
Capital
Resources
Stockholders equity decreased $125.6 million from
December 31, 2008 to $180.2 million at
September 30, 2009, largely due to the $123.1 million
net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Total capital to average risk-weighted assets decreased to 7.95%
at September 30, 2009 from 10.07% at December 31,
2008, primarily as a result of the decrease in Tier 1
capital. The Banks total capital to average risk-weighted
assets decreased to 10.17% at September 30, 2009 from
10.54% at December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of the
decrease in Tier 1 capital.
The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital
requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital
adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action regulations
involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain
off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting
practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject
to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk
weightings and other factors, and the regulators can lower
classifications in certain areas. Failure to meet regulatory
capital requirements could prompt regulatory action that could
have a direct material adverse effect on the financial
statements.
The prompt corrective action regulations provide five
classifications for banks, including well capitalized,
adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly
undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized, although these
terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If
adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is not required to
accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital
distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and
plans for capital restoration are required.
The Company was undercapitalized and the Bank was categorized as
well capitalized as of September 30, 2009.
The risk-based capital information for the Company is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
2,502,626
|
|
|
$
|
2,878,087
|
|
Average assets
|
|
|
3,650,053
|
|
|
|
3,590,313
|
|
Capital components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
180,239
|
|
|
$
|
305,834
|
|
Plus: Guaranteed trust preferred securities
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
Less: Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
(12,964
|
)
|
|
|
(14,683
|
)
|
Less: Goodwill
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
Less: Disallowed tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,748
|
)
|
Less: SERP prior service cost and decrease in projected benefit
obligation
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Unrealized (gains) losses on securities, net of tax
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
Plus: Unrealized losses on equity securities, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital
|
|
|
151,445
|
|
|
|
238,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
83,506
|
|
|
|
44,432
|
|
Reserve for unfunded commitments
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
Disallowed allowance
|
|
|
(53,644
|
)
|
|
|
(9,406
|
)
|
Qualifying subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Unrealized gains on equity securities, net of tax
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
198,903
|
|
|
$
|
289,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
Capital levels and minimum required levels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required
|
|
|
Minimum Required
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
for Capital Adequacy
|
|
|
to be Well Capitalized
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets Company
|
|
$
|
198,903
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
%
|
|
$
|
200,210
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
253,635
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
|
199,432
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
249,291
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets Company
|
|
|
151,445
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
100,105
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
221,297
|
|
|
|
8.88
|
|
|
|
99,716
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
149,574
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Tier I common capital to risk-weighted assets Company
|
|
|
(30,991
|
)
|
|
|
(1.24
|
)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
221,297
|
|
|
|
8.88
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Tier I capital to average assets Company
|
|
|
151,445
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
146,002
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
221,297
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
145,642
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
182,053
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required
|
|
|
Minimum Required
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
for Capital Adequacy
|
|
|
to be Well Capitalized
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets Company
|
|
$
|
289,967
|
|
|
|
10.07
|
%
|
|
$
|
230,247
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
301,993
|
|
|
|
10.54
|
|
|
|
229,244
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
$
|
286,555
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets Company
|
|
|
238,873
|
|
|
|
8.30
|
|
|
|
115,123
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
236,054
|
|
|
|
8.24
|
|
|
|
114,622
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
171,933
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Tier I common capital to risk-weighted assets Company
|
|
|
57,125
|
|
|
|
1.98
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
236,054
|
|
|
|
8.24
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Tier I capital to average assets Company
|
|
|
238,873
|
|
|
|
6.65
|
|
|
|
143,613
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
|
236,054
|
|
|
|
6.60
|
|
|
|
143,000
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
178,750
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
On July 28, 2009, the Company announced that it had
developed a detailed capital plan and timeline for execution.
The capital plan was adopted in order to, among other things,
improve the Companys common equity capital and raise
additional capital to enable it to better withstand and respond
to adverse market conditions. Management has completed, or is in
the process of completing, a number of steps as part of the
Capital Plan, including cost reduction initiatives, broadened
investment banking support to assist with the Capital Plan,
undertaking an offer to exchange the Companys
Series A Depositary Shares for common stock, negotiations
to restructure the senior and subordinated debt, and possible
capital raising activities. See Recent Developments for more
details.
The Company believes the successful completion of its Capital
Plan would substantially improve its capital position; however,
no assurances can be made that the Company will be able to
successfully complete all, or any portion of its Capital Plan,
or that the Capital Plan will not be materially modified in the
future. The Companys decision to implement its Capital
Plan reflects the adverse effect that the severe downturn in the
commercial and residential real estate markets has had on the
Companys financial condition and capital base, as well as
its assessment of current regulatory expectations of adequate
levels of common equity capital. If the Company is not able to
successfully complete a substantial portion of its Capital Plan,
the Company expects that its business, and the value of its
securities, will be materially and adversely affected, and it
will be more difficult for the Company to meet the capital
requirements expected of it by its primary banking regulators.
104
The Banks primary regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago and the Illinois Department of Financial and
Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, have recently
completed a safety and soundness examination of the Bank. As a
result of that examination, the Company expects that the Federal
Reserve Bank and the Division of Banking will request that the
Bank enter into a formal supervisory action requiring it to take
certain steps intended to improve its overall condition. Such a
supervisory action could require the Bank, among other things,
to: implement the capital restoration plan described above to
strengthen the Banks capital position; develop a plan to
improve the quality of the Banks loan portfolio by
charging off loans and reducing its position in assets
classified as substandard; develop and implement a
plan to enhance the Banks liquidity position; and enhance
the Banks loan underwriting and workout remediation teams.
The final supervisory action may contain other conditions and
targeted time frames as specified by the regulators.
The Company believes that the successful completion of all or a
significant portion of the Capital Plan will enable the Bank to
meet the requirements of any formal supervisory action with the
regulators and will ensure that the Bank is able to comply with
applicable bank regulations. However, the successful completion
of all or any portion of the capital plan is not assured and if
the Company or the Bank is unable to comply with the terms of
the anticipated supervisory action or any other applicable
regulations, the Company and the Bank could become subject to
additional, heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our
regulators were to take such additional actions, the Company and
the Bank could become subject to various requirements limiting
the ability to develop new business lines, mandating additional
capital,
and/or
requiring the sale of certain assets and liabilities. Failure of
the Company to meet these conditions could lead to further
enforcement action on behalf of the regulators. The terms of any
such additional regulatory actions could have a materially
adverse effect on the business of the Bank and the Company.
Liquidity
The Company manages its liquidity position of the Bank with the
objective of maintaining access to sufficient funds to respond
to the needs of depositors and borrowers and to take advantage
of earnings enhancement opportunities. At September 30,
2009, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
$327.4 million. The Bank expanded its liquidity during
2009. Liquid assets, including cash held at the Federal Reserve
Bank and unencumbered securities, improved from the second
quarter of 2009 by $86.5 million during the third quarter
of 2009 to $324.6 million compared to $36.1 million at
December 31, 2008.
In addition to the normal cash flows from its securities
portfolio, and repayments and maturities of loans and
securities, the Bank utilizes other short-term,
intermediate-term and long-term funding sources such as
securities sold under agreements to repurchase and overnight
funds purchased from correspondent banks.
The FHLB provides an additional source of liquidity which has
been used by the Bank since 1999. The Bank also has various
funding arrangements with commercial and investment banks in the
form of Federal funds lines, repurchase agreements, and
internet-based and brokered certificate of deposit programs. The
Bank maintains these funding arrangements to achieve favorable
costs of funds, manage interest rate risk, and enhance liquidity
in the event of deposit withdrawals. The FHLB advances and
repurchase agreements are subject to the availability of
collateral. The Bank has collateralized the FHLB advances with
various securities totaling $115.0 million and first
mortgage and home equity loans totaling $237.5 million and
the repurchase agreements with various securities totaling
$365.6 million at September 30, 2009. The Company
believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet its current and
future near-term liquidity needs; however, no assurances can be
made that the Companys liquidity position will not be
materially, adversely affected in the future. See Risk
Factors We may not be able to access sufficient and
cost-effective sources of liquidity necessary to fund our
operations and meet our payment obligations under our existing
funding commitments, including the repayment of our brokered
deposits.
The Company monitors and manages its liquidity position on
several levels, which include estimated loan funding
requirements, estimated loan payoffs, securities portfolio
maturities or calls, and anticipated depository buildups or
runoffs.
Certain
available-for-sale
securities were temporarily impaired at September 30, 2009,
primarily due to changes in interest rates as well as current
economic conditions that appear to be cyclical in nature. The
105
Company does not intend to sell nor would it be required to sell
the temporarily impaired securities before recovering their
amortized cost. See Note 5 Securities to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements for more details.
The Companys liquidity position is further enhanced by
monthly principal and interest payments received from a majority
of the loan portfolio.
The Company continues to seek opportunities to diversify the
customer base, enhance the product suite, and improve the
overall liquidity position. The Company has developed analytical
tools to help support the overall liquidity forecasting and
contingency planning. In addition, the Company has developed a
more efficient collateral management process which has
strengthened the Banks liquidity.
The Company announced on May 6, 2009, that the board of
directors made the decision to suspend the dividend on the
$43.1 million of Series A noncumulative redeemable
convertible perpetual preferred stock; defer the dividend on the
$84.8 million of Series T preferred stock; and take
steps to defer interest payments on $60.8 million of its
junior subordinated debentures as permitted by the terms of such
debentures. Since the May 6th announcement, the
Company has begun to defer interest on its junior subordinated
debentures. The accrued interest payable on junior subordinated
debentures was $1.1 million through September 30,
2009. The Company has no current plans to resume dividend
payments in respect of the Series A preferred stock or the
Series T preferred stock or interest payments in respect of
its junior subordinated debentures.
The Companys holding companys liquidity position is
affected by the amount of cash and other liquid assets on hand,
payment of interest and dividends on debt and equity instruments
issued by the holding company (all of which have been recently
suspended or deferred), capital it injects into the Bank, any
redemption of debt for cash issued by the holding company,
proceeds it raises through the issuance of debt
and/or
equity instruments through the holding company, if any, and
dividends received from the Bank. The Companys future
liquidity position may be adversely affected if one or a
combination of the following events occurs: the Bank continues
to experience net losses and, accordingly, is unable or
prohibited by the Companys regulators to pay a dividend to
the holding company sufficient to satisfy our holding
companys cash flow needs, the Company deems it advisable
or is required by the Federal Reserve to use cash at the holding
company to support the capital position of the Bank, the Bank
fails to remain well-capitalized and, accordingly,
the regulators require the Bank to obtain prior approval to
renew its existing brokered deposits or originate additional
brokered deposits, the Bank is required to provide additional
collateral against its FHLB borrowings and is unable to do so,
or the Company has difficulty raising cash at the holding
company level through the issuance of debt or equity instruments
or accessing additional sources of credit.
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance
agreement with the lender under its revolving and term loan
facilities, pursuant to which, among other things, the lender
agreed to forbear from exercising the rights and remedies
available to it as a consequence of certain continuing events of
default, except for continuing to impose default rates of
interest. The forbearance is effective for the period beginning
July 3, 2009 until March 31, 2010, or earlier if,
among other things, the Company breaches representations and
warranties contained in the forbearance agreement, or the
Company defaults on certain obligations under the forbearance
agreement or credit agreements (other than with respect to
certain financial and regulatory covenants) or the Bank becomes
subject to receivership by the FDIC or the Company becomes
subject to other bankruptcy or insolvency type proceedings.
Upon the expiration of the forbearance period, the principal and
interest payments that were due under the revolving line of
credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers,
at the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into will once
again become due and payable, along with such other amounts as
may have become due during the forbearance period. Absent
successful completion of all or a significant portion of the
Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would not be able to
meet any demands for payment of amounts then due at the
expiration of the forbearance period. If the Company is unable
to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources of
financing on acceptable terms, it may have a material adverse
effect on the Companys business and results of operations.
106
Interest
Rate Sensitivity Analysis
The Company performs a net interest income analysis as part of
its asset/liability management practices. Net interest income
analysis measures the change in net interest income in the event
of hypothetical parallel shifts in interest rates. This analysis
assesses the risk of change in net interest income in the event
of sudden and sustained 1.0% and 2.0% increases in market
interest rates. The table below presents the Companys
projected changes in net interest income for the various rate
shock levels at September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively. As result of current market conditions, 1.0%
and 2.0% decreases in market interest rates are not applicable
for either time period as those decreases would result in some
interest rate assumptions falling below zero. Nonetheless, the
Companys net interest income could decline in those
scenarios as yields on earning assets could continue to adjust
downward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Interest Income Over One Year Horizon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guideline
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
+200 bp
|
|
$
|
16,631
|
|
|
|
26.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,274
|
|
|
|
8.23
|
%
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)%
|
+100 bp
|
|
|
7,793
|
|
|
|
12.20
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
−100 bp
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
−200 bp
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
As shown above, at September 30, 2009, the effect of an
immediate 200 basis point increase in interest rates would
increase the Companys net interest income by 26.04%, or
$16.6 million. Overall net interest income sensitivity
remains within the Companys and recommended regulatory
guidelines.
In a rising rate environment, yields on floating rate loans and
investment securities are expected to re-price upwards more
quickly than the cost of funds. Due to a portion of the
Banks variable-rate loans being at rate floors, yields on
variable-rate loans are not expected to adjust upwards as
quickly or the full extent as market interest rates.
2008
Compared to 2007
The Company had a net loss of $158.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008. This loss was mainly attributed to
the recognition of impairment charges on its securities and
goodwill of $65.4 million and $80.0 million,
respectively, and a $71.8 million provision for loan
losses. Set forth below are some highlights of 2008 results
compared to 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss was $158.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to net income of
$18.6 million for the prior year.
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share for the year ended
December 31, 2008 were both $(5.82) compared to $0.71 for
2007.
|
|
|
|
The return on average assets was (4.32)% for 2008 compared to a
0.58% for 2007.
|
|
|
|
The return on average equity was (46.65)% in 2008 compared to a
6.13% in 2007.
|
|
|
|
Top line revenue (net interest income plus noninterest income)
decreased by $61.7 million, or 62.9%, to $36.4 million
for 2008 compared to $98.1 million in the prior year.
Excluding the gains, losses and impairment charges on securities
and the gain on sale of property, top line revenue increased
5.2%, or $5.1 million.
|
Net Interest Income.
Net interest income on a
fully tax-equivalent basis increased $3.3 million, or 3.9%,
to $89.6 million in 2008 from $86.2 million in 2007.
This increase was due to interest expense decreasing to a
greater extent than interest income due to the drops in the
federal funds and prime rates. The Federal Open Market Committee
(FOMC) cut the federal funds rate target by
225 basis points during 2008. As a result, the Company
aggressively re-priced its deposits downward and benefited from
the decreases in the federal
107
funds rate. The Northwest Suburban acquisition completed on
October 1, 2007 also contributed to this increase. The
Companys net interest margin (tax equivalent net interest
income as a percentage of earning assets) decreased to 2.75% for
2008 compared to 3.02% for 2007. The increase in nonaccrual
loans and decrease in dividends on FNMA and FHLMC preferred
stock contributed to the decline in the net interest margin.
Impairment charges on FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock and net
charge-offs partially offset the overall increase in earning
assets.
Trends in fully tax equivalent interest income and average
earning assets include:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income decreased $7.2 million to
$190.3 million in 2008 compared to $197.5 million in
2007. Average earning assets increased by $398.4 million
($498.3 million of earning assets were acquired through the
Northwest Suburban acquisition on October 1, 2007) but
average yields decreased by 107 basis points.
|
|
|
|
Interest income on loans decreased $4.0 million to
$151.4 million in 2008 from $155.3 million in 2007 due
to a 134 basis point drop in yield despite an increase of
$394.4 million in average loans; $439.2 million in
loans were acquired in the Northwest Suburban acquisition on
October 1, 2007. The decline in loan yield was primarily
due to the re-pricing of variable-rate loans resulting from
decreases in the prime rate as well as the increase in
nonaccrual loans. Most new and renewing loans beginning in the
fourth quarter of 2008 have floors in place which will help
mitigate future margin contraction.
|
|
|
|
Interest income on securities decreased $2.6 million to
$37.8 million in 2008 from $40.4 million in 2007 as a
result of a decrease in yields from 5.55% in 2007 to 5.20% while
average securities increased slightly. The decline in securities
yield was primarily due to the decrease in dividends on FNMA and
FHLMC preferred stock in the second half of the year.
|
|
|
|
Dividend income on FHLB stock was $333,000 in 2007 compared to
none in 2008.
|
Trends in interest expense and average interest-bearing
liabilities include:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased $10.5 million to
$100.7 million in 2008 from $111.2 million in 2007.
Average balances on interest-bearing liabilities increased by
$398.1 million in 2008 to $3.0 billion compared to
$2.6 billion in the prior year while rates paid decreased
94 basis points to 3.40% during 2008 compared to 4.34% in
2007.
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposits decreased by $10.7 million to
$66.0 million in 2008 from $76.7 million in 2007.
Average interest-bearing deposits increased $240.2 million
to $2.1 billion in 2008 compared to $1.9 billion in
the prior year; $405.4 million in interest-bearing deposits
were acquired in the Northwest Suburban acquisition on
October 1, 2007. Average rates paid on interest-bearing
deposits decreased by 98 basis points to 3.15% in 2008
compared to 4.13% in the prior year.
|
|
|
|
Average interest-bearing core deposits (interest-bearing demand
deposit, money market, and savings accounts) increased
$16.4 million in 2008 compared to 2007 and average rates
paid decreased 115 basis points.
|
|
|
|
Average certificates of deposit less than $100,000 increased by
$21.8 million and average rates paid decreased by
90 basis points. Average certificates of deposit greater
than $100,000 increased $202.0 million in 2008 and average
rates paid decreased 109 basis points. Average brokered
deposits increased by $144.8 million in 2008 compared to
the prior year.
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on borrowings increased slightly to
$34.7 million in 2008 from $34.5 million in 2007.
Average borrowings increased by $157.9 million to
$866.7 million in 2008 compared to $708.8 million in
the prior year, primarily as a result of the Companys
asset growth exceeding deposit growth and the $81.2 million
cash used for the Northwest Suburban acquisition in October 2007.
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase increased by $2.2 million in
2008 as a result of the increases in average balances of
$86.1 million, even as the average rates decreased
39 basis points.
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on FHLB advances decreased by $2.9 million
in 2008 compared to the prior year while average balances
increased by $17.8 million during the same period. Average
rates paid on FHLB advances dropped by 113 basis points in
2008 to 3.53% compared to 4.66% in 2007. In March 2008, the
Company prepaid $130.0 million of FHLB advances at a
weighted average rate of 4.94% and recognized a loss on the
early extinguishment of debt of $7.1 million. The Company
replaced these borrowings at a weighted average rate of 2.57% in
the second quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
Average junior subordinated debentures decreased by
$5.4 million in 2008 compared to the prior year while rates
paid decreased by 190 basis points. The Company acquired
$10.3 million in junior subordinated debentures at LIBOR
plus 2.70% through the Northwest Suburban acquisition on
October 1, 2007, but redeemed $15.5 million at LIBOR
plus 3.45% in November 2007.
|
|
|
|
Average notes payable, including revolving, term and
subordinated notes, increased by $59.3 million in 2008
compared to the prior year. The Company used the proceeds from a
$75.0 million term note it has with a correspondent bank to
pay the cash portion of the Northwest Suburban acquisition.
|
|
|
|
Short-term LIBOR rates, to which many of the Companys
borrowings are indexed, did not decline as quickly as prime and
other short-term rates which dropped quickly in late 2008 as the
economy faltered.
|
Provision for Loan Losses.
The provision for
loan losses increased by $66.9 million to
$71.8 million in 2008 from $4.9 million in 2007; the
large 2008 provision reflected the deterioration in credit
quality of the portfolio as economic conditions reduced:
(i) the borrowers ability to make debt service payments;
and (ii) the value of the underlying collateral for many
loans. As of December 31, 2008, the allowance for loan
losses totaled $44.4 million, or 1.77% of total loans, and
73% of nonaccrual loans compared to $26.7 million, or 1.08%
of total loans, and 54% of nonaccrual loans at December 31,
2007.
Noninterest Income.
The Companys total
noninterest income was $(50.6) million in 2008 compared to
$15.5 million in 2007. In 2008 losses on securities of
$82.0 million were mostly related to sales and impairments
recorded on FHLMC and FNMA preferred stock holdings. The Company
also recorded a gain on the sale of a branch of
$15.2 million in the first quarter. Ignoring those items,
noninterest income for 2008 would have been $16.2 million
or $746,000 million higher than 2007. Other changes in
noninterest income are noted below:
|
|
|
|
|
$1.0 million increase in service charges on deposits as a
result of the increased deposit base from the Northwest Suburban
acquisition;
|
|
|
|
$446,000 increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance
reflecting the addition of $12.9 million of such insurance
acquired with Northwest Suburban;
|
|
|
|
$234,000 decrease in trust income due mostly to the drop in
trust asset values from the difficult economy and the departure
of trust customers;
|
|
|
|
$263,000 decrease in insurance and brokerage commissions mostly
attributable to the difficult economy and the departure of
employees; and
|
|
|
|
$518,000 decrease in gains on sale of loans resulting from the
outsourcing of residential mortgage origination operations in
mid-2007.
|
Noninterest Expense.
The Companys total
noninterest expense increased by $106.6 million, to
$178.0 million in 2008, from $71.4 million in 2007.
Noninterest expense for 2008 included an $80.0 million
non-cash goodwill impairment charge and a $7.1 million loss
on the early extinguishment of debt. Without those items,
noninterest expense for 2008 would have been $90.8 million
or 27.2% higher than 2007. Noninterest expense as a percentage
of average assets was 4.86% for 2008 or 2.48% without the
goodwill impairment charge and loss on extinguishment of debt,
which management believes is a better measure of noninterest
expense. This compares to 2.24% for 2007. Other changes in
noninterest expense are noted below:
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits increased $8.2 million or
19.4% reflecting the additions to management and employees from
the Northwest Suburban acquisition, some key additions to the
management team and separation benefits of $1.2 million
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy and equipment increased $3.2 million in 2008
compared to the prior year reflecting the five additional
branches acquired in the Northwest Suburban acquisition;
|
|
|
|
Professional services increased $3.1 million in 2008 due to
an increase in loan workout legal fees and consulting expense;
|
|
|
|
Marketing expenses increased by $397,000 or 17.2% in 2008
compared to the prior year as deposit retention and Company
image campaigns were increased;
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed properties expense increased by $298,000 in 2008
compared to the prior year as a result of the increase in
properties;
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets increased by $659,000 as a
direct result of the increase in intangible assets from the
Northwest Suburban acquisition in October 2007; and
|
|
|
|
Non-capitalized merger related expense was $271,000 in 2008
compared to $1.3 million in 2007; and
|
|
|
|
Other expense increased $4.6 million or 51.8% in 2008
compared to the prior year. The Company was granted a one-time
credit to offset FDIC premiums as a result of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (Reform Act).
This one-time credit artificially reduced the Companys
2007 FDIC insurance expense, but the credit was fully utilized
by the end of 2007, and as a result of the expiration of that
credit and the addition of the Northwest Suburban deposits in
late 2007, the Company incurred an FDIC insurance expense
increase of $2.4 million in 2008. Additions to reserves for
off-balance sheet losses related to letters of credit were
$877,000 for 2008 compared to none for 2007.
|
|
|
|
The efficiency ratio was 144.87% for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to 68.29% in 2007.
|
Federal and State Income Tax.
The
Companys consolidated income tax rate varies from
statutory rates. The Company recorded income tax benefit of
$55.1 million in 2008 compared to expense of
$3.2 million in 2007. Set forth below is a reconciliation
of the effective tax rate for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 to statutory rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Income taxes computed at the statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(74,671
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,638
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Tax-exempt interest income on securities and loans
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(771
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
General business credits
|
|
|
(661
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit due to state
operating loss
|
|
|
(4,419
|
)
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
Life insurance cash surrender value increase, net of premiums
|
|
|
(1,195
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(1,072
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
Dividends received deduction
|
|
|
(642
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
27,733
|
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuity proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Nondeductible costs and other, net
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(55,073
|
)
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
Compared to 2006
Set forth below are some highlights of 2007 results compared to
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
Net income was $18.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to $17.7 million for the
prior year.
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended
December 31, 2007 were both $0.71 compared to basic
earnings per share of $0.75 and diluted of $0.74 for 2006.
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
The return on average assets was 0.58% for 2007 compared to a
0.67% for 2006.
|
|
|
|
The return on average equity was 6.13% in 2007 compared to a
7.04% in 2006.
|
|
|
|
Top line revenue (net interest income plus noninterest income)
increased by $8.3 million, or 9.2%, to $98.1 million
for 2007 compared to $89.8 million in the prior year.
|
|
|
|
The carrying cost of the previously disclosed Large Problem
Credit continued to have a substantial negative impact on
earnings, reducing net income by approximately $0.10 per diluted
share in 2007. The Large Problem Credit accounted for
$29.0 million of nonaccrual loans at year end 2007.
|
Net Interest Income.
Net interest income on a
fully tax-equivalent basis increased $6.7 million, or 8.4%,
to $86.2 million in 2007 from $79.6 million in 2006.
The Northwest Suburban acquisition contributed to the increase
in the net interest income for the year ended December 31,
2007 along with loan growth, but interest expense increased to a
greater extent. The Companys net interest margin (tax
equivalent net interest income as a percentage of earning
assets) decreased to 3.02% for 2007 compared to 3.32% for 2006.
Trends in fully tax equivalent interest income and average
earning assets include:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income increased $33.9 million to
$197.5 million in 2007 compared to $163.5 million in
2006. Average earning assets increased by $464.1 million
($498.3 million of earning assets were acquired through the
Northwest Suburban acquisition on October 1, 2007) and
average yields increased by 8 basis points.
|
|
|
|
Interest income on loans increased $31.2 million to
$155.3 million in 2007 from $124.1 million in 2006 due
to an increase of $429.8 million in average loans;
$439.2 million in loans were acquired in the Northwest
Suburban acquisition on October 1, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Interest income on securities increased $2.3 million to
$40.4 million in 2007 from $38.1 million in 2006 as a
result of an increase in yields on securities from 5.39% in 2006
to 5.55% while average securities increased $21.2 million,
or 3.0%.
|
Trends in interest expense and average interest-bearing
liabilities include:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense increased $27.3 million to
$111.2 million in 2007 from $84.0 million in 2006.
Average balances on interest-bearing liabilities increased by
$436.4 million in 2007 to $2.6 billion compared to
$2.1 billion in the prior year while rates paid increased
39 basis points to 4.34% during 2007 compared to 3.95% in
2006.
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposits increased by $19.2 million to
$76.7 million in 2007 from $57.5 million in 2006.
Average interest-bearing deposits increased $273.0 million
to $1.9 billion in 2007 compared to $1.6 billion in
the prior year; $405.4 million in interest-bearing deposits
were acquired in the Northwest Suburban acquisition on
October 1, 2007. Average rates paid on interest-bearing
deposits increased by 50 basis points to 4.13% in 2007
compared to 3.63% in the prior year.
|
|
|
|
Average interest-bearing core deposits (interest-bearing demand
deposit, money market, and savings accounts) increased
$71.6 million in 2007 compared to 2006 and average rates
paid increased 46 basis points.
|
|
|
|
Average certificates of deposit less than $100,000 decreased by
$34.0 million while average rates paid increased by
65 basis points. Average certificates of deposit greater
than $100,000 increased $247.1 million in 2007 and average
rates paid increased 27 basis points. Average brokered
deposits increased by $129.4 million in 2007 compared to
the prior year.
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on borrowings increased by $8.1 million to
$34.5 million in 2007 from $26.5 million in 2006.
Average borrowings increased by $163.4 million to
$708.8 million in 2007 compared to $545.4 million in
the prior year, primarily a result of the Companys asset
growth exceeding deposit growth and $81.2 million cash used
for the Northwest Suburban acquisition.
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase increased by $1.2 million in
2007 as a result of the increases in average balances of
$48.4 million.
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on FHLB advances increased by $5.0 million
in 2007 compared to the prior year while average balances
increased by $88.4 million during the same period. Average
rates paid on FHLB advances rose by 37 basis points in 2007
to 4.66% compared to 4.29% in 2006.
|
|
|
|
Average junior subordinated debentures decreased by
$5.3 million in 2007 compared to the prior year while rates
paid increased by 18 basis points. The Company acquired
$10.3 million in junior subordinated debentures at LIBOR
plus 2.70% through the Northwest Suburban acquisition, and
redeemed $15.5 million at LIBOR plus 3.45% in November 2007.
|
|
|
|
Average notes payable increased by $21.2 million in 2007
compared to the prior year. The Company used the proceeds from a
$75.0 million term note it has with a correspondent bank to
pay the cash portion of the Northwest Suburban acquisition. The
term note has an initial rate of one-month LIBOR plus
140 basis points.
|
Provision for Loan Losses.
The provision for
loan losses decreased by $7.2 million to $4.9 million
in 2007 from $12.1 million in 2006; the 2006 provision
reflected the deterioration in the credit quality of the Large
Problem Credit.
The Company recorded a $5.5 million provision for loan
losses and charged off $7.5 million of Large Problem Credit
loans in the fourth quarter of 2006. The Company recorded a loan
loss provision of $5.0 million relating to this problem
relationship in the second quarter of 2006. Net outstandings for
the Large Problem Credit increased by $3.2 million from
December 31, 2006 to $29.0 million representing 59.0%
of total nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2007.
As of December 31, 2007, the allowance for loan losses
totaled $26.7 million, or 1.08% of total loans, and was
equal to 54.4% of nonaccrual loans compared to
$23.2 million, or 1.19% of total loans, and 54.2% of
nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2006. The allowance was
increased by $2.8 million as a result of the Northwest
Suburban acquisition.
Noninterest Income.
The Companys total
noninterest income was $15.5 million in 2007 compared to
$14.6 million in 2006. Noninterest income as a percentage
of average assets was 0.49% for 2007 compared to 0.55% for the
prior year. The changes in noninterest income are noted below:
|
|
|
|
|
$964,000 increase in service charges on deposits as a result of
an increased deposit base;
|
|
|
|
$669,000 increase in the cash surrender value of life insurance
reflecting an addition of $12.9 million of such insurance
acquired from Northwest Suburban;
|
|
|
|
$938,000 increase in trust income reflecting an entire
years earnings from the trust assets under management
previously acquired from Royal American on July 1, 2006;
|
|
|
|
$297,000 increase in insurance and brokerage commissions mostly
as a result of increased annuity sales;
|
|
|
|
$317,000 decrease in gains on sale of loans resulting from the
outsourcing of residential mortgage origination operations;
|
|
|
|
$1.3 million gain on extinguishment of debt in
2006; and
|
|
|
|
$624,000 decrease in trading profits.
|
Noninterest Expense.
The Companys total
noninterest expense increased by $12.8 million, or 21.8%,
to $71.4 million in 2007 from $58.6 million in 2006.
Noninterest expense as a percentage of average assets was 2.24%
for 2007 compared to 2.22% for 2006. Other changes in
noninterest expense are noted below
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits increased $7.7 million
reflecting the additions to management and employees from the
Royal American and Northwest Suburban acquisitions;
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
Non-capitalized merger related expense was $1.3 million in
2007 compared to $1.6 million in 2006;
|
|
|
|
Occupancy and equipment increased $2.4 million in 2007
compared to the prior year reflecting the additional branches
acquired in the Royal American and Northwest Suburban
acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
Marketing expenses increased by $260,000 in 2007 compared to the
prior year due to increased marketing activity;
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets increased by $700,000; and
|
|
|
|
Professional services increased $499,000 in 2007 due to an
increase in loan workout legal fees and consulting expense.
|
The efficiency ratio was 68.29% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to 60.55% in 2006.
Federal and State Income Tax.
The
Companys consolidated income tax rate varies from
statutory rates. The Company recorded income tax expense of
$3.2 million in 2007 compared to $1.4 million in 2006.
Set forth below is a reconciliation of the effective tax rate
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 to statutory
rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Income taxes computed at the statutory rate
|
|
$
|
7,638
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,709
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Tax-exempt interest income on securities and loans
|
|
|
(771
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1,171
|
)
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
General business credits
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit due to state
operating loss
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(676
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
Income tax reserve reversal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(591
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
Life insurance cash surrender value increase, net of premiums
|
|
|
(1,072
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
(838
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
Dividends received deduction
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1,106
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
Annuity proceeds
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Stock based compensation, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
Interest-Earning
Assets and Interest-Bearing Liabilities
The following table sets forth the average balances, net
interest income and expense and average yields and rates for the
Companys interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities for the indicated periods on a tax-equivalent basis
assuming a 35.0% tax rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits due from banks
|
|
$
|
17,320
|
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
|
|
1.89
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,124
|
|
|
$
|
839
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,009
|
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable(1)
|
|
|
667,324
|
|
|
|
34,282
|
|
|
|
5.14
|
|
|
|
669,154
|
|
|
|
36,901
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
|
|
|
613,485
|
|
|
|
32,593
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
Exempt from federal income taxes(1)
|
|
|
60,704
|
|
|
|
3,563
|
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
|
|
58,844
|
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
|
|
5.93
|
|
|
|
93,347
|
|
|
|
5,492
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
728,028
|
|
|
|
37,845
|
|
|
|
5.20
|
|
|
|
727,998
|
|
|
|
40,392
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
|
|
|
706,832
|
|
|
|
38,085
|
|
|
|
5.39
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
|
|
29,975
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
|
|
24,697
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
18,105
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
6.14
|
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
6.16
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans(1)(3)(4)
|
|
|
513,321
|
|
|
|
31,475
|
|
|
|
6.13
|
|
|
|
452,438
|
|
|
|
34,105
|
|
|
|
7.54
|
|
|
|
296,533
|
|
|
|
23,219
|
|
|
|
7.83
|
|
Commercial real estate loans(1)(3)(4)(6)
|
|
|
1,639,442
|
|
|
|
102,112
|
|
|
|
6.23
|
|
|
|
1,336,421
|
|
|
|
100,954
|
|
|
|
7.55
|
|
|
|
1,110,828
|
|
|
|
83,891
|
|
|
|
7.55
|
|
Agricultural loans(1)(3)(4)
|
|
|
6,287
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
6.41
|
|
|
|
3,406
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
7.87
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
7.78
|
|
Consumer real estate loans(3)(4)(6)
|
|
|
314,917
|
|
|
|
16,754
|
|
|
|
5.32
|
|
|
|
285,999
|
|
|
|
19,207
|
|
|
|
6.72
|
|
|
|
240,601
|
|
|
|
16,207
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
Consumer installment loans(3)(4)
|
|
|
9,103
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
6.87
|
|
|
|
10,432
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
7.55
|
|
|
|
8,502
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
7.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2,483,070
|
|
|
|
151,369
|
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
|
2,088,696
|
|
|
|
155,322
|
|
|
|
7.44
|
|
|
|
1,658,920
|
|
|
|
124,139
|
|
|
|
7.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
3,258,393
|
|
|
$
|
190,282
|
|
|
|
5.84
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,859,965
|
|
|
$
|
197,481
|
|
|
|
6.91
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,395,894
|
|
|
$
|
163,548
|
|
|
|
6.83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
57,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
61,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
39,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(28,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,977
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
334,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-earning assets
|
|
|
402,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,661,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,181,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,635,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
200,869
|
|
|
$
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
$
|
182,276
|
|
|
$
|
3,366
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
%
|
|
$
|
150,503
|
|
|
$
|
1,759
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
Money-market demand accounts and savings accounts
|
|
|
384,496
|
|
|
|
4,994
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
386,722
|
|
|
|
9,949
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
346,933
|
|
|
|
7,571
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
Time deposits less than $100,000
|
|
|
619,828
|
|
|
|
25,106
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
598,012
|
|
|
|
29,603
|
|
|
|
4.95
|
|
|
|
631,993
|
|
|
|
27,202
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
|
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
|
|
|
891,354
|
|
|
|
33,948
|
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
689,335
|
|
|
|
33,774
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
442,199
|
|
|
|
20,455
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
|
Public funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,703
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
4.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,096,547
|
|
|
|
66,025
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
|
|
|
1,856,345
|
|
|
|
76,692
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
|
1,583,331
|
|
|
|
57,518
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements
|
|
|
390,399
|
|
|
|
15,326
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
|
|
|
304,269
|
|
|
|
13,131
|
|
|
|
4.32
|
|
|
|
255,843
|
|
|
|
11,913
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
FHLB advance
|
|
|
335,039
|
|
|
|
11,824
|
|
|
|
3.53
|
|
|
|
317,232
|
|
|
|
14,769
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
|
|
228,811
|
|
|
|
9,808
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
60,758
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
66,114
|
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
7.98
|
|
|
|
60,776
|
|
|
|
4,741
|
|
|
|
7.80
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
10,550
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
6.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
58,689
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
18,205
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated note payable
|
|
|
11,311
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
866,746
|
|
|
|
34,670
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
708,827
|
|
|
|
34,545
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
|
|
|
545,430
|
|
|
|
26,462
|
|
|
|
4.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
2,963,293
|
|
|
$
|
100,695
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,565,172
|
|
|
$
|
111,237
|
|
|
|
4.34
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,128,761
|
|
|
$
|
83,980
|
|
|
|
3.95
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
$
|
326,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
274,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
220,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
32,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
358,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
339,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,661,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,181,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,635,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (tax equivalent)(1)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
89,587
|
|
|
|
2.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
86,244
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
79,568
|
|
|
|
2.88
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (tax equivalent)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.32
|
%
|
Net interest income(2)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
86,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
75,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.67
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
%
|
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
109.96
|
%
|
|
|
111.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Adjusted for 35% tax rate and adjusted for the
dividends-received deduction where applicable.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Not adjusted for 35% tax rate or for the dividends-received
deduction.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balances; however,
these loans are not earning any interest.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes loan fees (in thousands) of $2,866, $2,747, and $3,113
for 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The following table reconciles reported net interest income on a
tax equivalent basis for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
86,966
|
|
|
$
|
82,632
|
|
|
$
|
75,282
|
|
Tax-equivalent adjustment to net interest income
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
|
4,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, fully tax-equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
89,587
|
|
|
$
|
86,244
|
|
|
$
|
79,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes construction loans.
|
Changes
in Interest Income and Expense
The changes in net interest income from period to period are
reflective of changes in the interest rate environment, changes
in the composition of assets and liabilities as to type and
maturity (and the inherent
115
interest rate differences related thereto), and volume changes.
Later sections of this discussion and analysis address the
changes in maturity composition of loans and investments and in
the asset and liability repricing gaps associated with interest
rate risk, all of which contribute to changes in net interest
margin.
The following table sets forth an analysis of volume and rate
changes in interest income and interest expense of the
Companys average interest-earning assets and average
interest-bearing liabilities for the indicated periods on a
tax-equivalent basis assuming a 35.0% tax rate. The table
distinguishes between the changes related to average outstanding
balances (changes in volume holding the interest rate constant)
and the changes related to average interest rates (changes in
average rate holding the outstanding balance constant). The
change in interest due to both volume and rate has been
allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the
relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in
each.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008 Compared to 2007
|
|
|
2007 Compared to 2006
|
|
|
|
Change Due to
|
|
|
Change Due to
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing due from banks
|
|
$
|
(512
|
)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(521
|
)
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
Securities taxable
|
|
|
(2,619
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(2,518
|
)
|
|
|
4,308
|
|
|
|
3,037
|
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
Securities exempt from federal income taxes
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(2,001
|
)
|
|
|
(2,047
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
(2,630
|
)
|
|
|
4,231
|
|
|
|
(6,861
|
)
|
|
|
10,886
|
|
|
|
11,782
|
|
|
|
(896
|
)
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
20,626
|
|
|
|
(19,468
|
)
|
|
|
17,063
|
|
|
|
17,041
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Agricultural loans
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Consumer real estate loans
|
|
|
(2,453
|
)
|
|
|
1,810
|
|
|
|
(4,263
|
)
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,049
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Consumer installment loans
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
(7,199
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,850
|
|
|
$
|
(34,049
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,933
|
|
|
$
|
33,628
|
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
(1,389
|
)
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
(1,704
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,607
|
|
|
$
|
429
|
|
|
$
|
1,178
|
|
Money market demand accounts and savings accounts
|
|
|
(4,955
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(4,898
|
)
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
Time deposits of less than $100,000
|
|
|
(4,497
|
)
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
(5,544
|
)
|
|
|
2,401
|
|
|
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
|
3,921
|
|
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
8,646
|
|
|
|
(8,472
|
)
|
|
|
13,319
|
|
|
|
12,044
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
Public funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(531
|
)
|
|
|
(531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements
|
|
|
2,195
|
|
|
|
3,462
|
|
|
|
(1,267
|
)
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
|
|
(918
|
)
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
(2,945
|
)
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
(3,736
|
)
|
|
|
4,961
|
|
|
|
4,057
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
(1,579
|
)
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
|
|
(1,177
|
)
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
1,459
|
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated note payable
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
(10,542
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,822
|
|
|
$
|
(26,364
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,257
|
|
|
$
|
19,338
|
|
|
$
|
7,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
|
|
$
|
3,343
|
|
|
$
|
11,028
|
|
|
$
|
(7,685
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,676
|
|
|
$
|
14,290
|
|
|
$
|
(7,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
Financial
Condition
Set forth below are some balance sheet highlights at
December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets decreased $122.6 million, or 3.3%, mainly as a
result of the securities and goodwill impairment charges as well
as loan charge-offs.
|
|
|
|
Loans increased $35.4 million, or 1.4%, reflecting internal
growth. Without charged off loans of $55.8 million and
transfers of $10.4 million into foreclosed properties, loan
growth would have been $101.6 million, or 4.1%.
|
|
|
|
Securities decreased by $96.3 million, or 12.9%, following
impairment charges on certain FHLMC and FNMA preferred equity
securities.
|
|
|
|
Deposits decreased by $45.4 million, or 1.9%.
|
Set forth below are some asset quality highlights at
December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses was 1.77% of total loans at
December 31, 2008 versus 1.08% at December 31, 2007.
The allowance for loan losses increased by $17.7 million,
reflecting managements updated assessments of impaired
loans and concerns about the continued deterioration of economic
conditions.
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans increased to 2.43% of total loans at
December 31, 2008 from 1.99% at December 31, 2007. The
Large Problem Credit accounted for $6.1 million, or 10.0%,
of the $61.1 million in nonaccrual loans at
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
Allowance to nonaccrual loans coverage 0.73x for 2008 compared
to 0.54x for 2007.
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off to average total loans were 2.18% for 2008
compared to 0.20% for 2007.
|
Loans
The following table sets forth the composition of the
Companys loan portfolio as of the indicated dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2007(1)(2)
|
|
|
2006(3)
|
|
|
2005(3)
|
|
|
2004(3)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
1,090,078
|
|
|
$
|
1,079,631
|
|
|
$
|
376,944
|
|
|
$
|
201,284
|
|
|
$
|
184,558
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
366,178
|
|
|
|
464,583
|
|
|
|
424,181
|
|
|
|
358,785
|
|
|
|
270,836
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
729,729
|
|
|
|
627,928
|
|
|
|
761,742
|
|
|
|
496,819
|
|
|
|
411,535
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
194,673
|
|
|
|
142,158
|
|
|
|
147,366
|
|
|
|
115,429
|
|
|
|
100,322
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
|
|
10,689
|
|
|
|
9,373
|
|
|
|
4,273
|
|
|
|
4,377
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
123,161
|
|
|
|
149,703
|
|
|
|
227,762
|
|
|
|
174,184
|
|
|
|
126,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross
|
|
|
2,510,151
|
|
|
|
2,474,692
|
|
|
|
1,947,368
|
|
|
|
1,350,774
|
|
|
|
1,097,675
|
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
(778
|
)
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2,509,759
|
|
|
|
2,474,327
|
|
|
|
1,946,816
|
|
|
|
1,349,996
|
|
|
|
1,097,299
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(44,432
|
)
|
|
|
(26,748
|
)
|
|
|
(23,229
|
)
|
|
|
(17,760
|
)
|
|
|
(16,217
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
$
|
2,465,327
|
|
|
$
|
2,447,579
|
|
|
$
|
1,923,587
|
|
|
$
|
1,332,236
|
|
|
$
|
1,081,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer real estate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,672
|
|
|
$
|
1,912
|
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Source of repayment classification.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period
presentation.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Collateral-based classification.
|
117
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company revised its
classification of commercial loans and commercial real estate
loans, changing its prior practice of classifying as commercial
real estate loans all loans to a business that included real
estate as collateral (collateral-based
classification). The classification of construction, home
equity, and residential mortgages were also reviewed. The new
method of presentation (source of repayment
classification) recognizes that loans to owner-occupied
businesses engaged in manufacturing, sales
and/or
services are commercial loans, regardless of whether real estate
is taken as collateral. These loans generally have a lower risk
profile than traditional commercial real estate loans. They are
primarily dependent on the borrowers business- generated
cash flows for repayment, not on the conversion of real estate
that may be pledged as collateral. Loans related to rental
income producing properties and properties intended to be sold
will continue to be classified as commercial real estate loans.
Completing this change in methodology involved a
loan-by-loan
review of the Companys commercial and commercial real
estate loans. The new presentation methodology was implemented
only as of December 31, 2007 and prospectively, as it is
impracticable to apply it to prior years data.
Set forth below are other highlights of changes in the loan
portfolio at December 31, 2008 compared to
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans increased $35.4 million, or 1.4%. Without
charged off loans of $55.8 million and transfers of
$10.4 million into foreclosed properties, loan growth would
have been $101.6 million, or 4.1%.
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans increased $10.4 million, or 1.0%.
|
|
|
|
Construction loans decreased by $98.4 million, or 21.2%.
|
|
|
|
A reduction in construction lending that began earlier in the
2008 continued throughout the year with construction and land
development loans declining to 14.6% of the total loan
portfolio, down from 18.8% one year ago.
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans rose by $101.8 million, or
16.2%.
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans increased $52.5 million, or 36.9%.
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans decreased $4.4 million, or 40.8%.
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans decreased $26.5 million, or
17.7%.
|
|
|
|
The Company had loan growth in the latter part of the fourth
quarter of 2008 which was facilitated by the new capital raised
in December 2008 under the TARP program. In addition, most new
and renewing loans beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 have
floors in place which will help mitigate future margin
contraction.
|
There were no loans held for sale at December 31, 2008 and
2007. In July 2007, the Company entered into a joint marketing
arrangement with a leading privately held mortgage bank in
Chicago and exited the mortgage banking business resulting in no
loans held for sale at year-end 2007. Management believes that
this arrangement enabled the Company to provide better pricing
to its customers while also providing the Company with a high
quality source of additional loan volume.
The Company attempts to balance the types of loans in its
portfolio with the objective of managing risk. Some of the risks
the Company evaluates in its lending business include:
|
|
|
|
|
The primary risks associated with commercial loans are the
quality of the borrowers management, financial strength
and cash flow resources, and the impact of local economic
factors.
|
|
|
|
Risks associated with real estate loans include concentrations
of loans in a certain loan type, such as commercial or
residential, and fluctuating land and property values.
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans also have risks associated with concentrations of
loans in a single type of loan, as well as the risk a borrower
may become unemployed as a result of deteriorating economic
conditions.
|
|
|
|
The Company does not hold any
sub-prime
loans in its portfolio.
|
118
Loan
Maturities
The following table sets forth the remaining maturities, based
upon contractual dates, for selected loan categories (source of
repayment classification) as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
1-5 Years
|
|
|
Over 5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Less
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
498,986
|
|
|
$
|
453,690
|
|
|
$
|
56,074
|
|
|
$
|
61,859
|
|
|
$
|
19,469
|
|
|
$
|
1,090,078
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
324,696
|
|
|
|
10,442
|
|
|
|
31,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366,178
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
265,978
|
|
|
|
410,443
|
|
|
|
38,823
|
|
|
|
14,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729,729
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
7,237
|
|
|
|
13,403
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
101,987
|
|
|
|
194,673
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
2,636
|
|
|
|
3,274
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
23,975
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
44,443
|
|
|
|
45,869
|
|
|
|
123,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross
|
|
|
1,107,990
|
|
|
|
915,227
|
|
|
|
198,597
|
|
|
|
121,012
|
|
|
|
167,325
|
|
|
|
2,510,151
|
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
1,107,990
|
|
|
$
|
915,227
|
|
|
$
|
198,597
|
|
|
$
|
121,012
|
|
|
$
|
167,325
|
|
|
$
|
2,509,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
Loans
The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued at the time a
loan is 90 days past due unless the credit is well-secured
and in process of collection. Past due status is based on
contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on
nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of
principal or interest is considered doubtful. All interest
accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on
nonaccrual or charged off is reversed against interest income.
The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis
or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual.
A loan is returned to accrual status when all the principal and
interest amounts contractually due are current and future
payments are reasonably assured.
Under the authoritative guidance for impairments (ASC
310-10-35)
the Company currently defines loans that are individually
evaluated for impairment to include all loans over $300,000
where the internal credit rating is at or below a predetermined
classification. All other smaller balance loans with similar
attributes are evaluated for impairment in total.
The classification of a loan as impaired or nonaccrual does not
necessarily indicate that the principal is uncollectible, in
whole or in part. Subject to the de minimus level noted
above, the Company makes a determination as to the
collectibility on a
case-by-case
basis based upon the specific facts of each situation. The
Company considers both the adequacy of the collateral and the
other resources of the borrower in determining the steps to be
taken to collect impaired or nonaccrual loans. Alternatives that
are typically considered to collect impaired or nonaccrual loans
are foreclosure, collection under guarantees, loan
restructuring, or judicial collection actions.
Loans that are considered to be impaired are reduced to the
present value of expected future cash flows or to the fair value
of the related collateral, adjusted for selling and other
discounts, by allocating a portion of the allowance to such
loans. If these allocations require an increase to be made to
the allowance for loan losses, such increases are included in
the provision for loan losses charged to expense.
119
The following table sets forth information on the Companys
nonaccrual loans and nonperforming assets as of the indicated
dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired and other loans 90 days past due and accruing
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual and impaired loans not accruing
|
|
$
|
61,104
|
|
|
$
|
49,173
|
|
|
$
|
42,826
|
|
|
$
|
7,905
|
|
|
$
|
9,296
|
|
Troubled-debt restructuring
|
|
|
11,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
|
|
11,154
|
|
|
|
8,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
84,128
|
|
|
$
|
51,393
|
|
|
$
|
45,466
|
|
|
$
|
19,059
|
|
|
$
|
17,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans to total loans
|
|
|
2.43
|
%
|
|
|
1.99
|
%
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
|
|
0.85
|
%
|
Total nonperforming assets to total loans and foreclosed
properties
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
2.33
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
Total nonperforming assets to total assets
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
0.78
|
|
In addition to the loans summarized above, on December 31,
2008, the Company had $71.0 million of loans currently
performing that have been internally assigned higher credit risk
ratings. The higher risk ratings are primarily due to internally
identified specific or collective credit characteristics
including decreased capacity to repay loan obligations due to
adverse market conditions, a lack of borrower or
guarantors capital capacity and reduced collateral
valuations securing the loans as a secondary source of
repayment. These loans continue to accrue interest. Management
does not expect losses on these loans, but recognizes that a
higher level of scrutiny is prudent under the circumstances.
Similarly rated loans were $43.0 million as of
September 30, 2008 and $3.5 million as of
December 31, 2007.
Interest payments on impaired loans are generally applied to
principal, unless the loan principal is considered to be fully
collectible, in which case interest is recognized on a cash
basis. During 2008, 2007, and 2006, the Company recognized
interest income on impaired loans of $836,000,
$1.4 million, and $2.9 million, respectively.
Nonaccrual loans increased $11.9 million to
$61.1 million at December 31, 2008 from
$49.2 million at December 31, 2007. This increase in
nonaccrual loans is net of $53.3 million of nonaccrual
loans charged-off during the year and reflects the continued
deterioration of economic conditions. The three largest
relationships added in 2008 to nonaccrual status and outstanding
at December 31, 2008, included a relationship including
$13.5 million in loans secured by residential condominiums
to a developer, a relationship with $9.0 million in loans
secured by commercial property, vacant land and a single family
residence to a real estate investor, and $2.5 million in
loans secured by retail and office properties to real estate
developers. Nonaccrual loan relationships with over
$3.0 million in outstanding balances representing
$28.6 million or 47% of total nonaccrual loan balances as
of December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
a $13.5 million loan relationship secured by residential
condominiums to a developer. This balance represents our total
exposure to this customer. Based upon estimated collateral
values, the Company has $0.9 million in the specific loan
loss reserve for these loans as of December 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
a $9.0 million loan relationship secured by commercial
property, vacant land and a single family residence to a real
estate investor. The Company has an additional $1.9 million
in available credit to this customer and has $1.4 million
in the specific loan loss reserve for these loans as of
December 31, 2008, based upon estimated collateral
values; and
|
|
|
|
a $6.1 million loan relationship secured by a single family
residence to a building contractor also described as the Large
Problem Credit. The Company has an additional $1.6 million
in credit exposure to this customer and has $0.3 million in
the specific loan loss reserve for these loans as of
December 31, 2008, based upon estimated collateral values.
|
120
In 2008, the Company charged off $11.6 million of loan
balances related to the previously announced Large Problem
Credit, reduced outstanding balances on these loans by a net
$5.7 million through the sale of assets, and took title to
a substantial piece of real estate previously serving as
collateral at an estimated net realizable value of
$5.3 million. At December 31, 2008, total outstanding
loan balances related to the Large Problem Credit represented
$6.1 million, or 10.0%, of nonaccrual loans. While the
current carrying value of these loans at December 31, 2008
reflects managements best current estimate of net
realizable value, there can be no assurance that additional
losses may not be incurred.
Foreclosed properties increased to $12.0 million in 2008
from $2.2 million in 2007 mainly as a result of the
$5.3 million Large Problem Credit property and a
condominium development property. Foreclosed properties are
carried at their estimated net realizable value.
Total nonperforming assets increased by $32.7 million from
$51.4 million in 2007 to $84.1 million in 2008. The
Company had $11.0 million in troubled-debt restructuring to
a real estate developer that was secured by retail and office
buildings as of December 31, 2008 and none as of
December 31, 2007. In order to improve the collectibility
of the troubled-debt restructuring, the Company restructured the
terms of the debt by terminating the forbearance agreement and
lowering the interest rates including changing them from fixed
to floating rates. No additional commitments were outstanding on
the troubled-debt restructured loans as of December 31,
2008. These troubled-debt restructured loans were still accruing
and no allowance was allocated at December 31, 2008.
Analysis
of Allowance for Loan Losses
The Company recognizes that credit losses will be experienced
and the risk of loss will vary with, among other things; general
economic conditions; the type of loan being made; the
creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan; and
in the case of a collateralized loan, the quality of the
collateral. The allowance for loan losses represents the
Companys estimate of the amount deemed necessary to
provide for probable future losses to be incurred in the
portfolio. In making this determination, the Company analyzes
the ultimate collectibility of the loans in its portfolio by
incorporating feedback provided by internal loan staff.
On a quarterly basis, management of the Bank meets to review the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Each loan officer
grades his or her individual commercial credits and the
Companys independent loan review personnel review the
officers grades. In the event that the loan is downgraded
during this review, the loan is included in the allowance
analysis at the lower grade. The grading system is in compliance
with the regulatory classifications, and the allowance is
allocated to the loans based on the regulatory grading, except
in instances where there are known differences (e.g., collateral
value is nominal).
Estimating the amount of the allowance for loan losses requires
significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the
amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired
loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on
historical loss experience, and consideration of current
economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible
to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the
largest asset type on the consolidated balance sheet. Loan
losses are charged off against the allowance, while recoveries
of amounts previously charged off are credited to the allowance.
A provision for loan losses is charged to operations based on
managements periodic evaluation of the factors previously
mentioned, as well as other pertinent factors.
The Companys methodology for determining the allowance for
loan losses represents an estimation performed pursuant to the
authoritative guidance for contingencies (ASC 450) and loan
impairments (ASC
310-10-35).
The allowance reflects expected losses resulting from analyses
developed through specific credit allocations for individual
loans and historical loss experience for each loan category. The
specific credit allocations are based on regular analyses of all
loans over $300,000 where the internal credit rating is at or
below a predetermined classification. These analyses involve a
high degree of judgment in estimating the amount of loss
associated with specific loans, including estimating the amount
and timing of future cash flows and collateral values. The
allowance for loan losses also includes consideration of
concentrations and changes in portfolio mix and volume and other
qualitative factors. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an
integral part
121
of their examinations, may require the Company to make additions
to the allowance based on their judgment about information
available to them at the time of their examinations.
There are many factors affecting the allowance for loan losses;
some are quantitative while others require qualitative judgment.
The process for determining the allowance (which management
believes adequately considers all of the potential factors which
potentially result in credit losses) includes subjective
elements and, therefore, may be susceptible to significant
change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management
estimates, additional provisions for credit losses could be
required that could adversely affect the Companys earnings
or financial position in future periods.
The following table sets forth loans charged off and recovered
by type of loan and an analysis of the allowance for loan losses
for the indicated periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Average total loans
|
|
$
|
2,483,070
|
|
|
$
|
2,088,696
|
|
|
$
|
1,658,920
|
|
|
$
|
1,210,873
|
|
|
$
|
984,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans at end of year
|
|
$
|
2,509,759
|
|
|
$
|
2,474,327
|
|
|
$
|
1,946,816
|
|
|
$
|
1,349,996
|
|
|
$
|
1,097,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
$
|
61,104
|
|
|
$
|
49,173
|
|
|
$
|
42,826
|
|
|
$
|
7,905
|
|
|
$
|
9,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
26,748
|
|
|
$
|
23,229
|
|
|
$
|
17,760
|
|
|
$
|
16,217
|
|
|
$
|
14,459
|
|
Addition resulting from acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,767
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
11,475
|
|
|
|
5,092
|
|
|
|
5,912
|
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
Consumer real estate loans(1)
|
|
|
3,846
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Commercial real estate loans(1)
|
|
|
40,389
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
4,401
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
Agricultural loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer installment loans
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
55,849
|
|
|
|
5,975
|
|
|
|
10,809
|
|
|
|
2,519
|
|
|
|
2,148
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Consumer real estate loans(1)
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Commercial real estate loans(1)
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
Agricultural loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer installment loans
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
54,081
|
|
|
|
4,139
|
|
|
|
9,825
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
71,765
|
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
|
|
12,050
|
|
|
|
2,589
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance at end of the year
|
|
$
|
44,432
|
|
|
$
|
26,748
|
|
|
$
|
23,229
|
|
|
$
|
17,760
|
|
|
$
|
16,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average total loans
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
Allowance to total loans at end of year
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
Allowance to nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
x
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes construction loans.
|
The provision for loan losses increased $66.9 million to
$71.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
from $4.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2007, reflecting managements updated assessments of
impaired loans and concerns about the continued deterioration of
economic conditions. The allowance for
122
loan losses was $44.4 million at December 31, 2008 and
$26.7 million at December 31, 2007. Total recoveries
on loans previously charged off were $1.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Net charge-offs increased $49.9 million to
$54.1 million, or 2.18% of average loans, in 2008 compared
to $4.1 million, or 0.20% of average loans in 2007.
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans ratio was 0.73x at
December 31, 2008 and 0.54x at December 31, 2007.
The following table sets forth the Companys allocation of
the allowance for loan losses by types of loans (collateral
based classification) as of the indicated dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
8,829
|
|
|
|
20.80
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,369
|
|
|
|
21.52
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,156
|
|
|
|
19.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,727
|
|
|
|
14.54
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,124
|
|
|
|
16.72
|
%
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
24,518
|
|
|
|
65.79
|
|
|
|
19,336
|
|
|
|
65.15
|
|
|
|
16,166
|
|
|
|
65.35
|
|
|
|
7,807
|
|
|
|
69.24
|
|
|
|
6,837
|
|
|
|
68.92
|
|
Agricultural
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Consumer real estate
|
|
|
6,258
|
|
|
|
12.67
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
12.64
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
14.10
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
15.76
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
13.90
|
|
Consumer installment
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
4,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
44,432
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
26,748
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
23,229
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,760
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,217
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to concerns about the collectibility of loan balances that
could grow due to letter of credit draw downs, the Company
increased the accrual for losses on unfunded commitments to
$1.1 million at December 31, 2008 from $233,000 at
December 31, 2007.
The Company uses an internal asset classification system as a
means of reporting problem and potential problem assets. At each
scheduled Bank Board of Directors meeting, a watch list is
presented, showing significant loan relationships listed by
internal risk rating as Special Mention, Substandard, and
Doubtful. Set forth below is a discussion of each of these
classifications.
Special Mention:
A special mention extension
of credit is defined as having potential weaknesses that deserve
managements close attention. If left uncorrected, these
potential weaknesses may, at some future date, result in the
deterioration of the repayment prospects for the credit or the
institutions credit position. Special mention credits are
not considered as part of the classified extensions of credit
category and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to
warrant classification. They are currently protected but are
potentially weak. They constitute an undue and unwarranted
credit risk.
Loans in this category have some identifiable problem but, in
managements opinion, offer no immediate risk of loss. An
extension of credit that is not delinquent also may be
identified as special mention. These loans are classified due to
Bank managements actions or the servicing of the loan. The
lending officer may be unable to properly supervise the credit
because of an inadequate loan or credit agreement. There may be
questions regarding the condition of
and/or
control over collateral. Economic or market conditions may
unfavorably affect the obligor in the future. A declining trend
in the obligors operations or an imbalanced position in
the balance sheet may exist, although it is not to the point
that repayment is jeopardized. Another example of a special
mention credit is one that has other deviations from prudent
lending practices.
If the Bank may have to consider relying on a secondary or
alternative source of repayment, then collection may not yet be
in jeopardy, but the loan may be considered special mention.
Other trends that indicate that the loan may deteriorate further
include such red flags as continuous overdrafts,
negative trends on a financial statement, such as a deficit net
worth, a delay in the receipt of financial statements, accounts
receivable ageings, etc. These loans on a regular basis can be
30 days or more past due. Judgments, tax liens, delinquent
real estate taxes, cancellation of insurance policies and
exceptions to Bank policies are other red flags.
123
Substandard:
A substandard extension of credit
is one inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and
paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if
any. Extensions of credit so classified must have a well-defined
weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the
debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that
the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not
corrected. In other words, there is more than a normal risk of
loss. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of
substandard credits, does not have to exist in individual
extensions of credit classified substandard.
The likelihood that a substandard loan will be paid from the
primary source of repayment may also be uncertain. Financial
deterioration is underway and very close attention is warranted
to insure that the loan is collected without a loss. The Bank
may be relying on a secondary source of repayment, such as
liquidating collateral, or collecting on guarantees. The
borrower cannot keep up with either the interest or principal
payments. If the Bank is forced into a subordinated or unsecured
position due to flaws in documentation, the loan may also be
substandard. If the loan must be restructured, or interest rate
concessions made, it should be classified as such. If the bank
is contemplating foreclosure or legal action, the credit is
likely substandard.
Doubtful:
An extension of credit classified
doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified
substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses
make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of
currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly
questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is
extremely high; however, because of certain important and
reasonably specific pending factors that may work to the
advantage of and strengthen the credit, its classification as an
estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be
determined. Pending factors may include a proposed merger or
acquisition, liquidation proceedings, capital injection,
perfecting liens on additional collateral, or refinancing plans.
If the primary source of repayment is gone, and there is doubt
as to the quality of the secondary source, then the loan will be
considered doubtful. If a court suit is pending, and is the only
means of collection, a loan is generally doubtful. As stated
above, the loss amount in this category is often undeterminable,
and the loan is classified doubtful until said loss can be
determined.
The Companys determination as to the classification of its
assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to
review by the Banks primary regulators in the course of
its regulatory examinations, which can order the establishment
of additional general or specific loss allowances. There can be
no assurance that regulators, in reviewing the Companys
loan portfolio, will not request the Company to materially
increase its allowance for loan losses. Although management
believes that adequate specific and general loan loss allowances
have been established, actual losses are dependent upon future
events and, as such, further additions to the level of specific
and general loan loss allowances may become necessary. The
Companys allowance for loan losses at December 31,
2008 is considered by management to be adequate.
The Company holds certain loans that are accounted for under the
authoritative guidance for loans and debt securities acquired
with deteriorated credit quality (ASC
310-30-05),
which addresses accounting for differences between contractual
cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an
investors initial investment in loans or debt securities
acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at
least in part, to credit quality. It includes loans acquired in
purchase business combinations and applies to all
nongovernmental entities. This guidance does not apply to loans
originated by the Company. The Companys assessment
identified $5.9 million in acquired loans to which the
application of the provisions of this guidance was required. As
a result of the application of
SOP 03-3,
the Company recorded purchase accounting adjustments reflecting
a reduction in loans of $2.0 million related to acquired
impaired loans, thus reducing the carrying value of these loans
to $3.9 million as of December 31, 2007. See
Note 3 Business Combinations to the
consolidated financials statements. The carrying value of these
loans was $778,000 as of December 31, 2008, and there
continues to be no allowance for loan losses regarding these
loans. The Company does not consider prepayments in the
determination of contractual or expected cash flows.
Securities
The Company manages its securities portfolio to provide a source
of both liquidity and earnings. The Company has an
asset/liability committee which develops current investment
policies based upon its operating
124
needs and market circumstances. The investment policy of the
Bank is reviewed by senior financial management of the Company
in terms of its objectives, investment guidelines and
consistency with overall Company performance and risk management
goals. The Banks investment policy is formally reviewed
and approved annually by its Board of Directors. The
asset/liability committee of the Bank is responsible for
reporting and monitoring compliance with the investment policy.
Reports are provided to the Banks Board of Directors and
the Board of Directors of the Company on a regular basis.
The following tables set forth the composition of the
Companys securities portfolio by major category as of the
indicated dates. The securities portfolio as of
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 has been categorized as
either
available-for-sale
or
held-to-maturity
in accordance with the authoritative guidance for
investments debt and equity securities (ASC 320).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and obligations of U.S. government-sponsored
entities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
263,483
|
|
|
$
|
265,435
|
|
|
$
|
263,483
|
|
|
$
|
265,435
|
|
|
|
40.3
|
%
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
57,309
|
|
|
|
56,664
|
|
|
|
58,560
|
|
|
|
57,927
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
29,016
|
|
|
|
29,124
|
|
|
|
281,592
|
|
|
|
283,679
|
|
|
|
310,608
|
|
|
|
312,803
|
|
|
|
47.4
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,176
|
|
|
|
15,241
|
|
|
|
19,176
|
|
|
|
15,241
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
30,267
|
|
|
$
|
30,387
|
|
|
$
|
624,309
|
|
|
$
|
621,949
|
|
|
$
|
654,576
|
|
|
$
|
652,336
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and obligations of U.S. government-sponsored
entities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
181,983
|
|
|
$
|
183,613
|
|
|
$
|
181,983
|
|
|
$
|
183,613
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
%
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
60,985
|
|
|
|
61,400
|
|
|
|
62,239
|
|
|
|
62,668
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
36,347
|
|
|
|
35,644
|
|
|
|
383,633
|
|
|
|
379,040
|
|
|
|
419,980
|
|
|
|
414,684
|
|
|
|
54.4
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,139
|
|
|
|
65,979
|
|
|
|
85,139
|
|
|
|
65,979
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,095
|
|
|
|
20,849
|
|
|
|
22,095
|
|
|
|
20,849
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
37,601
|
|
|
$
|
36,912
|
|
|
$
|
733,835
|
|
|
$
|
710,881
|
|
|
$
|
771,436
|
|
|
$
|
747,793
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and obligations of U.S. government-sponsored
entities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,958
|
|
|
$
|
6,958
|
|
|
$
|
6,958
|
|
|
$
|
6,958
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
|
97,167
|
|
|
|
96,987
|
|
|
|
98,853
|
|
|
|
98,684
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
44,245
|
|
|
|
42,990
|
|
|
|
444,392
|
|
|
|
434,108
|
|
|
|
488,637
|
|
|
|
477,098
|
|
|
|
75.5
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,131
|
|
|
|
41,521
|
|
|
|
41,131
|
|
|
|
41,521
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,034
|
|
|
|
10,407
|
|
|
|
11,034
|
|
|
|
10,407
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
45,931
|
|
|
$
|
44,687
|
|
|
$
|
600,682
|
|
|
$
|
589,981
|
|
|
$
|
646,613
|
|
|
$
|
634,668
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
As of December 31, 2008, the Company held no securities of
a single issuer with a book value exceeding 10% of
stockholders equity other than those of the
U.S. government or government-sponsored entities.
The total fair value of the securities portfolio was
$652.3 million as of December 31, 2008, or 99.7% of
amortized cost. The total fair value of the securities portfolio
was $747.8 million and $634.7 million as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Securities
available-for-sale
are carried at fair value, with related unrealized net gains or
losses, net of deferred income taxes, recorded as an adjustment
to equity capital. At December 31, 2008, unrealized losses
on securities
available-for-sale
were $2.4 million, or $1.4 million net of taxes,
compared to $23.0 million, or $13.9 million net of
taxes, at December 31, 2007. The Company recognized an
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $17.6 million at March 31, 2008
on certain FNMA and FHLMC preferred equity securities with a
cost basis of $85.1 million. In September 2008, the Company
sold $16.9 million of the remaining $67.5 million
recognizing a $16.7 million loss. The Company recognized an
additional
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $47.8 million at September 30,
2008 on the remaining securities and thereby reduced the
amortized cost to their fair value of $2.7 million.
Management believes this impairment was primarily attributable
to economic conditions at that time, FNMA and FHLMC being placed
into the Federal Housing Finance Agencys conservatorship,
and the discontinued dividend payments. Since recovery did not
appear likely in the near future, the Company recognized the
impairment losses. See Note 4 Securities
of the Notes to the consolidated financial statements for more
details on the Companys securities portfolio. The
securities portfolio does not contain any
sub-prime
or
Alt-A mortgage-backed securities.
The Companys securities
available-for-sale
portfolio decreased $88.9 million, or 12.5%, in 2008
compared to 2007 mainly as a result of the impairment charges
and sales of the FNMA and FHLMC preferred equity securities. The
Company also changed the mix of its securities portfolio to
improve earnings through the sale of certain mortgage-backed
securities and the investment in higher-yielding
U.S. government-sponsored entities notes during 2008. Set
forth below is a summary of the change in the
available-for-sale
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and obligations of
U.S. government-sponsored entities increased by
$81.8 million to $265.4 million, or 40.3% of the
securities portfolio, at December 31, 2008 compared to
$183.6 million at year end 2007.
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency and government-sponsored entity
mortgage-backed securities decreased 25.2%, or
$95.4 million, from $379.0 million at
December 31, 2007 to $283.7 million at
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
As noted above, the Company recognized a impairment charges of
$65.4 million on the FHLMC and FNMA preferred equities in
2008 bringing the amortized cost to $2.7 million. During
2008, $16.9 million in equity securities were sold at a
loss of $16.7 million. Equity securities were $930,000 at
December 31, 2008 compared to $66.0 million at
December 31, 2007. Equity securities included capital
securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities.
|
|
|
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions decreased
$4.7 million to $56.7 million at December 31,
2008 from $61.4 million at December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Other bonds decreased by $5.6 million to $15.2 million
at December 31, 2008 compared to $20.8 million at
December 31, 2007. Other bonds include high grade corporate
bonds primarily issued by financial institutions.
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
decreased $7.3 million, or 19.5%, from $37.6 million
at December 31, 2007 to $30.3 million at
December 31, 2008, due to paydowns and sales of
mortgage-backed securities as permitted under the authoritative
guidance for investments and debt and equity securities (ASC
320). These securities sold had paid down to less than 15% of
their original face value.
There were no trading securities held at December 31, 2008
or December 31, 2007. When acquired, the Company holds
trading securities and derivatives on a short-term basis based
on market and liquidity conditions.
126
Investment
Maturities and Yields
The following tables set forth the contractual or estimated
maturities of the components of the Companys securities
portfolio as of December 31, 2008 and the weighted average
yields. The table assumes estimated fair values for
available-for-sale
securities and amortized cost for
held-to-maturity
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After One But
|
|
|
After Five But
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within One Year
|
|
|
Within Five Years
|
|
|
Within Ten Years
|
|
|
After Ten Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale-Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and obligations of U.S. government-sponsored
entities
|
|
$
|
7,687
|
|
|
|
2.81
|
%
|
|
$
|
52,617
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
%
|
|
$
|
205,131
|
|
|
|
5.34
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
265,435
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
|
|
|
8,135
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
|
|
|
36,034
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
11,813
|
|
|
|
4.08
|
|
|
|
56,664
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
27,795
|
|
|
|
5.40
|
|
|
|
255,884
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,679
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
|
Equity securities(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,745
|
|
|
|
4.53
|
|
|
|
3,063
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
8,433
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
15,241
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
36,164
|
|
|
|
4.82
|
%
|
|
$
|
320,381
|
|
|
|
3.98
|
%
|
|
$
|
244,228
|
|
|
|
5.09
|
%
|
|
$
|
21,176
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
621,949
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
4.02
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,016
|
|
|
|
4.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,016
|
|
|
|
4.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
29,467
|
|
|
|
4.42
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
30,267
|
|
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Equity securities, although they do not have a maturity date,
are included in the after ten years column.
|
Deposits
The following table sets forth the changes in deposits as of the
periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand
|
|
$
|
334,495
|
|
|
$
|
321,317
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
|
176,224
|
|
|
|
226,225
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
208,484
|
|
|
|
291,501
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
129,101
|
|
|
|
129,476
|
|
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000
|
|
|
689,896
|
|
|
|
633,022
|
|
Certificates of deposit over $100,000
|
|
|
435,687
|
|
|
|
511,743
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit
|
|
|
438,904
|
|
|
|
344,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,078,296
|
|
|
|
2,136,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
2,412,791
|
|
|
$
|
2,458,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits(1)
|
|
$
|
848,304
|
|
|
$
|
968,519
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand, money
market, and savings.
|
127
Set forth below is a summary of the change in the Companys
deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits decreased by $45.4 million, or 1.8%;
noninterest-bearing deposits increased by $13.2 million
while interest-bearing deposits decreased by $58.5 million.
|
|
|
|
Core deposits, which include noninterest-bearing demand,
interest-bearing demand, money market, and savings deposits,
decreased $120.2 million, or 12.4%.
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposits less than $100,000 increased 9.0% or
$56.9 million.
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit over $100,000 decreased
$76.1 million, or 14.9%.
|
|
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit increased $94.0 million,
or 27.3%. The Company purchased brokered certificates of deposit
in order to move away from purchasing Federal funds during the
financial system disruption. The underlying certificates of
deposits of the brokered certificates of deposit are in
denominations of less than $100,000.
|
The Company continues to participate in the FDICs
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. This program consists of
two components. The first is the Transaction Account Guarantee
Program where all noninterest-bearing transaction deposit
accounts, including all personal and business checking deposit
accounts, and NOW accounts, which are capped at a rate no higher
than 0.50% are fully guaranteed, through December 31, 2009,
regardless of dollar amount. All other deposit accounts continue
to be covered by the FDICs expanded deposit insurance
limit of $250,000 through December 31, 2009. The second
component is the Debt Guarantee Program, which guarantees newly
issued senior unsecured debt.
In 2009, the FDIC plans to increase premium assessments to
maintain adequate funding of the Deposit Insurance Fund.
Assessment rates set by the FDIC effective March 1, 2009
range from 12 to 45 basis points. These increases in
premium assessments will increase the Companys expenses.
See Business Supervision and Regulation-FDIC
Insurance Premiums on Deposit Accounts.
On May 22, 2009, the FDIC board agreed to impose an
emergency special assessment of 20 basis points on all
banks to restore the Deposit Insurance Fund to an acceptable
level. The assessment, which was payable on September 30,
2009, is in addition to a planned increase in premiums and a
change in the way regular premiums are assessed. This emergency
special assessment for the Company was $1.7 million based
on June 30, 2009 data.
The Company competes for core deposits in the heavily-banked
Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area. Competitive pricing has
made it difficult to maintain and grow these types of deposits.
The level of competition for core deposits is not expected to
ease in the near term. To overcome this challenge, the Company
has changed and expanded staffing and management at its banking
centers and initiated a number of customer outreach initiatives.
The Company is also pursuing a new on-line account opening
process to further develop the growth of core deposit
relationships. The Companys Big Bank Relief
marketing campaign is focused on building relationships.
The Companys recent campaigns have been promoting
relationship savings accounts and other core products. In
conjunction with this strategy, the Banks retail incentive
program has shifted its focus to relationship building, with
incentives being paid for cross-selling achievements.
Relationship building, along with a continued focus on providing
excellent customer service, is key to solidifying and growing
the Banks customer base.
128
The following table sets forth the average amount of and the
average rate paid on deposits by category for the indicated
periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
326,104
|
|
|
|
13.46
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
274,819
|
|
|
|
12.90
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
220,706
|
|
|
|
12.23
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
200,869
|
|
|
|
8.29
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
182,276
|
|
|
|
8.55
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
150,503
|
|
|
|
8.34
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
Savings and money market accounts
|
|
|
384,496
|
|
|
|
15.87
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
386,722
|
|
|
|
18.15
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
346,933
|
|
|
|
19.23
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
Time Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit, less than $100,000(1)
|
|
|
619,829
|
|
|
|
25.58
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
598,012
|
|
|
|
28.06
|
|
|
|
4.95
|
|
|
|
631,993
|
|
|
|
35.03
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
|
Certificates of deposit, over $100,000(1)(2)
|
|
|
891,354
|
|
|
|
36.80
|
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
689,335
|
|
|
|
32.34
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
442,199
|
|
|
|
24.51
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
|
Public funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,703
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
4.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total time deposits
|
|
|
1,511,183
|
|
|
|
62.38
|
|
|
|
3.91
|
|
|
|
1,287,347
|
|
|
|
60.40
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
|
|
|
1,085,895
|
|
|
|
60.19
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
2,422,652
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
2.73
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,131,164
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.60
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,804,037
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Certificates of deposit exclusive of public funds.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes brokered deposits.
|
The following table summarizes the maturity distribution of
certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or more as of the
dates indicated. These deposits have been made by individuals,
businesses, and public and other
not-for-profit
entities, most of which are located within the Companys
market area.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
402,122
|
|
|
$
|
308,259
|
|
|
$
|
271,994
|
|
Over three months through six months
|
|
|
172,417
|
|
|
|
241,765
|
|
|
|
63,168
|
|
Over six months through twelve months
|
|
|
229,867
|
|
|
|
230,985
|
|
|
|
160,478
|
|
Over twelve months
|
|
|
70,185
|
|
|
|
75,598
|
|
|
|
58,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
874,591
|
|
|
$
|
856,607
|
|
|
$
|
553,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
Borrowings
The following table summarizes the Companys borrowings as
of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,000
|
|
|
$
|
66,000
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
283,400
|
|
|
|
201,079
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
|
|
323,439
|
|
|
|
319,883
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
|
|
60,724
|
|
|
|
65,812
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
817,041
|
|
|
$
|
821,063
|
|
|
$
|
652,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys borrowings include overnight federal funds
purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, FHLB
advances, junior subordinated debentures, and commercial bank
notes payable and subordinated debt. The following tables set
forth categories and the balances of the Companys
borrowings for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,000
|
|
|
$
|
66,000
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of year
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
Maximum amount outstanding(1)
|
|
$
|
184,500
|
|
|
$
|
109,000
|
|
|
$
|
95,000
|
|
Average amount outstanding
|
|
|
77,000
|
|
|
|
35,630
|
|
|
|
29,474
|
|
Weighted average interest rate during year(2)
|
|
|
2.62
|
%
|
|
|
5.13
|
%
|
|
|
5.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Based on amounts outstanding at each month end during the year.
|
|
(2)
|
|
During 2008, the federal funds target rate decreased by
225 basis points.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
297,650
|
|
|
$
|
283,400
|
|
|
$
|
201,079
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of year
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
|
4.21
|
%
|
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
Maximum amount outstanding(1)
|
|
$
|
394,764
|
|
|
$
|
317,118
|
|
|
$
|
294,599
|
|
Average amount outstanding
|
|
|
311,346
|
|
|
|
268,639
|
|
|
|
226,369
|
|
Weighted average interest rate during year
|
|
|
4.26
|
%
|
|
|
4.21
|
%
|
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Based on amount outstanding at month end during each year.
|
The Bank is a member of the FHLB. Membership requirements
include common stock ownership in the FHLB. At December 31,
2008, the majority of the FHLB advances have various call
provisions ranging from three months to two years. The Bank is
currently in compliance with the FHLBs membership
requirements.
130
The following table sets forth categories and the balances of
the Companys FHLB advances as of the indicated dates or
for the indicated periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
FHLB advances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
380,000
|
|
|
$
|
323,439
|
|
|
$
|
319,883
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of year
|
|
|
3.38
|
%
|
|
|
4.49
|
%
|
|
|
4.54
|
%
|
Maximum amount outstanding(1)
|
|
$
|
380,000
|
|
|
$
|
323,439
|
|
|
$
|
319,883
|
|
Average amount outstanding
|
|
|
335,039
|
|
|
|
317,232
|
|
|
|
228,811
|
|
Weighted average interest rate during year
|
|
|
3.53
|
%
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Based on amount outstanding at month end during each year.
|
The Companys credit agreements with a correspondent bank
at December 31, 2008 consisted of a revolving line of
credit, a term note loan, and subordinated debenture in the
amounts of $8.6 million, $55.0 million, and
$15.0 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2008, the revolving line of credit had a
maximum availability of $25.0 million, an interest rate of
one-month LIBOR plus 155 basis points, and at
December 31, 2008, matured on March 3, 2009. During
the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company utilized the proceeds
from a $75.0 million term note loan to pay for the cash
requirements of the Northwest Suburban acquisition. On
March 31, 2008, the Company converted $15.0 million of
this term note into subordinated debt and further reduced the
remaining term note balance to $55.0 million. The resulting
term note had an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus
155 basis points at December 31, 2008 and matures on
September 28, 2010.
At December 31, 2008, the subordinated debt had an interest
rate of one-month LIBOR plus 350 basis points and matures
on March 31, 2018, and qualifies as Tier 2 capital.
The revolving line of credit and term note included the
following covenants at December 31, 2008: (1) the Bank
must not have nonperforming loans (loans on nonaccrual status
and 90 days or more past due and troubled-debt restructured
loans) in excess of 3.00% of total loans, (2) the Bank must
report a quarterly profit, excluding charges related to
acquisitions, and (3) the Bank must remain well
capitalized. The Company was in compliance with these debt
covenants at December 31, 2008.
As a result of the effects of recent economic conditions, the
increase in nonperforming assets, and the impairment charges on
goodwill and the FNMA and FHLMC preferred securities, the
Company sought covenant waivers on two occasions since
December 31, 2007. First, the lender waived a covenant
violation in the first quarter of 2008 resulting from the
Companys net loss recognized in that period. Second, the
lender waived a covenant violation in the third quarter of 2008
resulting from the Companys net loss recognized in that
period, contingent upon the Company making accelerated principal
payments under the aforementioned term loan agreement. See
Note 14 Credit Agreement of the Notes to the
consolidated financial statements for more details. Since
December 31, 2008, the Company has incurred additional
covenant violations and has been subject to default rates of
interests. See Risk Factors The Company is
party to loan agreements that require it to observe certain
covenants that limit its flexibility in operating its business;
and it has recently breached covenants under its loan
agreements, which , as a result, have given its lenders the
right to take certain courses of actions that have been and,
with respect to unexercised rights, would be significantly
detrimental to holders of the Companys securities.
At December 31, 2008, the Company had $60.8 million in
junior subordinated debentures owed to unconsolidated trusts
that were formed to issue trust preferred securities.
131
The following table details the unconsolidated trusts and their
common and trust preferred securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatory
|
|
Optional
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
Redemption
|
Issuer
|
|
Issue Date
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Date
|
|
Date(1)
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBHI Capital Trust III
|
|
December 19, 2003
|
|
$
|
9,279
|
|
|
$
|
9,279
|
|
|
LIBOR+3.00%
|
|
December 30, 2033
|
|
December 30, 2008
|
MBHI Capital Trust IV
|
|
December 19, 2003
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
LIBOR+2.85%
|
|
January 23, 2034
|
|
January 23, 2009
|
MBHI Capital Trust V
|
|
June 7, 2005
|
|
|
20,619
|
|
|
|
20,619
|
|
|
LIBOR+1.77%
|
|
June 15, 2035
|
|
June 15, 2010
|
Royal Capital Trust I
|
|
March 30, 2004
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
6.62% until
July 23, 2009;
then
LIBOR+2.75%
|
|
July 23, 2034
|
|
July 23, 2009
|
Unamortized purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accounting adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northwest Suburban
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Trust I
|
|
May 18, 2004
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
LIBOR+2.70%
|
|
July 23, 2034
|
|
July 23, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,791
|
|
|
$
|
60,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Redeemable at option of the Company.
|
Capital
Resources
The Company monitors compliance with bank and bank-holding
company regulatory capital requirements, focusing primarily on
risk-based capital guidelines. Under the risk-based capital
method of capital measurement, the ratio computed is dependent
upon the amount and composition of assets recorded on the
balance sheet and the amount and composition of
off-balance-sheet items, in addition to the level of capital.
Included in the risk-based capital method are two measures of
capital adequacy: Tier 1, or core capital, and total
capital, which consists of Tier 1 plus Tier 2 capital.
See Business Supervision and
Regulation Bank Holding Company Regulation for
definitions of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital and
Note 16 to the Notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
The following tables set forth the Companys capital ratios
as of the indicated dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-Based Capital Ratios December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
238,873
|
|
|
|
8.30
|
%
|
|
$
|
258,862
|
|
|
|
9.21
|
%
|
|
$
|
266,753
|
|
|
|
11.92
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital minimum requirement
|
|
|
115,123
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
112,457
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
89,492
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
289,967
|
|
|
|
10.07
|
|
|
|
285,843
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
|
290,158
|
|
|
|
12.97
|
|
Total capital minimum requirements
|
|
|
230,247
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
224,914
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
178,984
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
2,878,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,811,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,237,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2008, the Company issued 84,784 shares of
Series T fixed cumulative perpetual preferred stock at
$1,000 per share to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP CPP
raising $84.8 million in capital, which qualifies for
Tier I capital.
In October 2007, the Company issued 3.7 million shares of
common stock as a result of the Northwest Suburban acquisition
increasing capital by $55.1 million. In December 2007, the
Company issued 1,725,000 depositary shares each representing
1/100th of a share of its Series A noncumulative
redeemable convertible perpetual preferred stock at $25.00 per
share through a public offering raising net new equity capital
of $41.4 million.
In July 2006, the Company issued 2.9 million shares of
common stock as a result of the Royal American acquisition
increasing capital by $63.8 million. In August 2005, the
Company issued 3.5 million new common shares through a
public offering raising a net amount of new capital of
$67.9 million.
132
The Company includes $59.0 million for 2008 and 2007 and
$64.0 million for 2006 of trust preferred securities in
Tier I capital based on regulatory limitations.
Liquidity
The Company manages its liquidity position with the objective of
maintaining access to sufficient funds to respond to the needs
of depositors and borrowers and to take advantage of earnings
enhancement opportunities. At December 31, 2008, the
Company had cash and cash equivalents of $63.1 million. In
addition to the normal inflow of funds from its securities
portfolio, and repayments and maturities of loans and
securities, the Company utilizes other short-term,
intermediate-term and long-term funding sources such as
securities sold under agreements to repurchase and overnight
funds purchased from correspondent banks.
The FHLB provides an additional source of liquidity which has
been used by the Bank since 1999. The Bank also has various
funding arrangements with commercial and investment banks in the
form of Federal funds lines, repurchase agreements, and brokered
certificate of deposit programs. The Bank maintains these
funding arrangements to achieve favorable costs of funds, manage
interest rate risk, and enhance liquidity in the event of
deposit withdrawals. The FHLB advances and repurchase agreements
are subject to the availability of collateral. The Company
believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet its current and
future liquidity needs.
The Company monitors and manages its liquidity position on
several levels, which vary depending upon the time period. As
the time period is expanded, other data is factored in,
including estimated loan funding requirements, estimated loan
payoffs, securities portfolio maturities or calls, and
anticipated depository buildups or runoffs.
The Company classifies the majority of its securities as
available-for-sale,
thereby maintaining significant liquidity. Certain
available-for-sale
securities were temporarily impaired at December 31, 2008,
primarily due to changes in interest rates as well as current
economic conditions that appear to be cyclical in nature. The
Company has both the intent and ability to hold each of the
temporarily impaired securities for the time necessary to
recover its amortized cost. See the Securities
section and Risk Factors for more details. The
Companys liquidity position is further enhanced by the
structuring of a majority of its loan portfolio interest
payments as monthly.
The Companys cash flows are comprised of three
classifications: cash flows from operating activities, cash
flows from investing activities, and cash flows from financing
activities. See Statement of Cash Flows in the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
The Company continues to seek opportunities to diversify the
customer base, enhance the product suite, and improve the
overall liquidity position. The Company has developed analytical
tools to help support the overall liquidity forecasting and
contingency planning. In addition, the Company is developing a
more efficient collateral management process which will further
strengthen the Companys liquidity.
133
Contractual
Obligations, Commitments, and Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
2-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deposits without a stated maturity
|
|
$
|
848,304
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
848,304
|
|
Consumer and brokered certificates of deposits
|
|
|
1,406,407
|
|
|
|
143,367
|
|
|
|
14,702
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564,487
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
|
|
14,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,801
|
|
FIN 48 liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
2,314,841
|
|
|
$
|
191,116
|
|
|
$
|
17,083
|
|
|
$
|
727,593
|
|
|
$
|
2,378
|
|
|
$
|
3,253,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Duration of liability is not determinable.
|
The following table details the amounts and expected maturities
of significant commitments as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
2-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Lines of Credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
104,884
|
|
|
$
|
13,098
|
|
|
$
|
5,319
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
123,434
|
|
Consumer real estate
|
|
|
26,757
|
|
|
|
37,496
|
|
|
|
33,252
|
|
|
|
54,481
|
|
|
|
151,986
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
235,855
|
|
|
|
18,364
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
3,238
|
|
|
|
259,222
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
43,934
|
|
|
|
11,602
|
|
|
|
3,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,032
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
68,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commitments
|
|
$
|
479,643
|
|
|
$
|
80,560
|
|
|
$
|
43,832
|
|
|
$
|
60,072
|
|
|
$
|
664,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset/Liability
Management
The business of the Company and the composition of its
consolidated balance sheet consist of investments in
interest-earning assets (primarily loans, mortgage-backed
securities, and other securities) that are primarily funded by
interest-bearing liabilities (deposits and borrowings). All of
the financial instruments of the Company as of December 31,
2008 were held for
other-than-trading
purposes. Such financial instruments have varying levels of
sensitivity to changes in market rates of interest. The
Companys net interest income is dependent on the amounts
of and yields on its interest-earning assets as compared to the
amounts of and rates on its interest-bearing liabilities. Net
interest income is therefore sensitive to changes in market
rates of interest.
The Companys asset/liability management strategy is to
maximize net interest income while limiting exposure to risks
associated with changes in interest rates. This strategy is
implemented by the Companys ongoing analysis and
management of its interest rate risk. A principal function of
asset/liability management is
134
to coordinate the levels of interest-sensitive assets and
liabilities to manage net interest income fluctuations within
limits in times of fluctuating market interest rates.
Interest rate risk results when the maturity or repricing
intervals and interest rate indices of the interest-earning
assets, interest-bearing liabilities, and off-balance-sheet
financial instruments are different, thus creating a risk that
will result in disproportionate changes in the value of and the
net earnings generated from the Companys interest-earning
assets, interest-bearing liabilities, and off-balance-sheet
financial instruments. The Companys exposure to interest
rate risk is managed primarily through the Companys
strategy of selecting the types and terms of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities that generate favorable
earnings while limiting the potential negative effects of
changes in market interest rates. Because the Companys
primary source of interest-bearing liabilities is customer
deposits, the Companys ability to manage the types and
terms of such deposits may be somewhat limited by customer
maturity preferences in the market areas in which the Company
operates. Over the past decade, hundreds of new bank branches
have opened in the Companys marketplace. Deposit pricing
is competitive with promotional rates frequently offered by
competitors. Ongoing competition for core and time deposits are
driving up yields paid. Borrowings, which include FHLB advances,
short-term borrowings, and long-term borrowings, are generally
structured with specific terms which, in managements
judgment, when aggregated with the terms for outstanding
deposits and matched with interest-earning assets, reduce the
Companys exposure to interest rate risk. The rates, terms,
and interest rate indices of the Companys interest-earning
assets result primarily from the Companys strategy of
investing in securities and loans (a substantial portion of
which have adjustable rates). This permits the Company to limit
its exposure to interest rate risk, together with credit risk,
while at the same time achieving a positive interest rate spread
from the difference between the income earned on
interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing
liabilities.
Management uses a duration model for the Banks internal
asset/liability management. The model uses cash flows and
repricing information from loans and certificates of deposit,
plus repricing assumptions on products without specific
repricing dates (e.g., savings and interest-bearing demand
deposits), to calculate the durations of the Banks assets
and liabilities. Securities are stress tested, and the
theoretical changes in cash flow are key elements of the
Companys model. The model also projects the effect on the
Companys earnings and theoretical value for a change in
interest rates. The model computes the duration of the
Banks rate sensitive assets and liabilities, a theoretical
market value of the Banks rate sensitive assets and
liabilities and the effects of rate changes on the Banks
earnings and market value. The Banks exposure to interest
rates is reviewed on a monthly basis by senior management and
the Companys Board of Directors.
Effects
of Inflation
Interest rates are significantly affected by inflation, but it
is difficult to assess the impact, since neither the timing nor
the magnitude of the changes in the various inflation indices
coincide with changes in interest rates. Inflation does impact
the economic value of longer term, interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, but the Company attempts to limit
its long-term assets and liabilities, as indicated in the tables
set forth under Financial Condition and
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk.
135
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company performs a net interest income analysis as part of
its asset/liability management practices. Net interest income
analysis measures the change in net interest income in the event
of hypothetical changes in interest rates. This analysis
assesses the risk of change in net interest income in the event
of sudden and sustained 1.0% and 2.0% increases in market
interest rates. The tables below present the Companys
projected changes in net interest income for the various rate
shock levels at December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively. As result of current market conditions, 1.0%
and 2.0% decreases in market interest rates are not applicable
for 2008 as those decreases would result in some deposit
interest rate assumptions falling below zero. Nonetheless, the
Companys net interest income could decline in those
scenarios as yields on earning assets could continue to adjust
downward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Interest Income Over One Year Horizon
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Guideline
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
+ 200 bp
|
|
$
|
6,274
|
|
|
|
8.23
|
%
|
|
$
|
(2,161
|
)
|
|
|
(2.36
|
)%
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)%
|
+ 100 bp
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
−100 bp
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
−200 bp
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(3,507
|
)
|
|
|
(3.83
|
)
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
As shown above, at December 31, 2008, the effect of an
immediate 200 basis point increase in interest rates would
increase the Companys net interest income by 8.23%, or
$6.3 million. Overall net interest income sensitivity
remains within the Companys and recommended regulatory
guidelines.
The changes in the Companys net interest income
sensitivity were due, in large part, to the addition of
optionality on both sides of the balance sheet. The changes in
net interest income over the one year horizon for
December 31, 2008 under the 1.0% and 2.0% increases in
market interest rates scenarios are reflective of this
optionality. In a rising rate environment, yields on floating
rate loans and investment securities are expected to re-price
upwards more quickly than the cost of funds. The Company
believes it manages such volatility to acceptable levels and is
being appropriately compensated for the additional risk.
The Company does not have any
sub-prime
or
Alt-A mortgage-backed securities in its securities portfolio nor
does it have any
sub-
prime
loans.
136
Gap
analysis is used to determine the
repricing characteristics of the Companys assets and
liabilities. The following table sets forth the interest rate
sensitivity of the Companys assets and liabilities as of
December 31, 2008, and provides the repricing dates of the
Companys interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities as of that date, as well as the Companys
interest rate sensitivity gap percentages for the periods
presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-3
|
|
|
4-12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
1-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
|
|
$
|
1,735
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,735
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale,
at fair value
|
|
|
224,510
|
|
|
|
106,857
|
|
|
|
186,407
|
|
|
|
104,175
|
|
|
|
621,949
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity,
at amortized cost
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
4,378
|
|
|
|
13,947
|
|
|
|
10,283
|
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
31,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,698
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
1,211,502
|
|
|
|
338,705
|
|
|
|
876,678
|
|
|
|
82,874
|
|
|
|
2,509,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
1,471,104
|
|
|
$
|
449,940
|
|
|
$
|
1,077,032
|
|
|
$
|
197,332
|
|
|
$
|
3,195,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
15,860
|
|
|
$
|
47,580
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,784
|
|
|
$
|
176,224
|
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
18,764
|
|
|
|
56,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,429
|
|
|
|
208,484
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
11,619
|
|
|
|
34,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,625
|
|
|
|
129,101
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
524,127
|
|
|
|
883,728
|
|
|
|
156,621
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1,564,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
570,370
|
|
|
|
1,022,456
|
|
|
|
156,621
|
|
|
|
328,849
|
|
|
|
2,078,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
50,481
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
169,081
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
637,650
|
|
|
|
817,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
739,451
|
|
|
$
|
1,032,766
|
|
|
$
|
156,621
|
|
|
$
|
966,499
|
|
|
$
|
2,895,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitivity gap
|
|
$
|
731,653
|
|
|
$
|
(582,826
|
)
|
|
$
|
920,411
|
|
|
$
|
(769,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
300,071
|
|
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap
|
|
$
|
731,653
|
|
|
$
|
148,827
|
|
|
$
|
1,069,238
|
|
|
$
|
300,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitivity gap to total assets
|
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
|
|
(16.3
|
)%
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
(21.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap to total assets
|
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
29.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
The chart above shows the Company was asset sensitive or had a
positive Gap in the short-term
(0-3 months)
meaning a greater amount of interest-earning assets are
repricing or maturing than the amount of interest-bearing
liabilities during the same time period. A positive gap
generally indicates the Company is positioned to benefit from a
rising interest rate environment. The cumulative interest
sensitivity Gap is still positive but substantially decreased in
the 4-12 month period, indicating the Companys GAP
position is much more closely matched through that time period
and rate changes would theoretically have much less effect on
net interest income. In the 1-5 year period the cumulative
interest sensitivity Gap becomes much more positive
137
again showing the Companys benefit from rising interest
rates would increase. The Gap position does not necessarily
indicate the level of the Companys interest rate
sensitivity or the impact to net interest income because the
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are
repricing off of different indices.
Mortgage-backed securities, including adjustable rate mortgage
pools, are included in the above table based on their estimated
principal paydowns obtained from outside analytical sources.
Loans are included in the above table based on contractual
maturity or contractual repricing dates. Deposits are based on
managements analysis of industry trends and customer
behavior.
Computations of the prospective effects of hypothetical interest
rate changes are based on numerous assumptions, including
relative levels of market interest rates, loan prepayments and
deposit decay rates. These computations should not be relied
upon as indicative of actual results. Actual values may differ
from those projections set forth above, should market conditions
vary from assumptions used in preparing the analyses. Further,
the computations do not contemplate any actions the Company may
undertake in response to changes in interest rates. The
Gap analysis is based upon assumptions as to when
assets and liabilities will reprice in a changing interest rate
environment. Because such assumptions can be no more than
estimates, certain assets and liabilities indicated as maturing
or otherwise repricing within a stated period may, in fact,
mature or reprice at different times and at different volumes
than those estimated. Also, the renewal or repricing of certain
assets and liabilities can be discretionary and subject to
competitive and other pressures. Therefore, the gap table
included above does not and cannot necessarily indicate the
actual future impact of general interest rate movements on the
Companys net interest income. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Asset/Liability Management.
138
BUSINESS
The
Company
Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc., the Company, a Delaware corporation
founded in 1983, is a community-based bank holding company
headquartered in Melrose Park, Illinois. Through its wholly
owned subsidiaries, the Company provides a wide range of
services, including traditional banking services, personal and
corporate trust services, and insurance brokerage and retail
securities brokerage services. The Companys principal
operating subsidiary is Midwest Bank and Trust Company, the
Bank, an Illinois state bank that operates 23 banking centers
throughout the Chicago metropolitan area. The Company operates
in one business segment, community banking, providing a full
range of services to individual and corporate customers. Midwest
Financial and Investment Services, Inc., a subsidiary of the
Bank, is a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, FINRA,
registered broker/dealer that provides securities brokerage and
insurance services to customers of the Bank.
The Company focuses on establishing and maintaining long-term
relationships with customers and is committed to providing for
the financial services needs of the communities it serves. In
particular, the Company continues to emphasize its relationships
with individual customers and
small-to-medium-sized
businesses. The Company actively evaluates the credit needs of
its markets, including low- and moderate-income areas, and
offers products that are responsive to the needs of its customer
base. The markets served by the Company provide a mix of real
estate, commercial and industrial, and consumer lending
opportunities, as well as a stable core deposit base. The
Company has expanded its trust administration and trust services
activities along with broker/dealer activities.
Recent
Developments
On October 22, 2009, we entered into a forbearance
agreement with the lender under our revolving and term loan
facilities, pursuant to which, among other things, the lender
agreed to forbear from exercising the rights and remedies
available to it as a consequence of certain continuing events of
default, except for the continued imposition of the default
rates of interest. The forbearance is effective for the period
beginning July 3, 2009 until March 31, 2010, or
earlier if, among other things, we breach representations and
warranties contained in, or default on our obligations under,
the forbearance agreement, or we default on certain obligations
under our loan agreements (other than with respect to certain
financial and regulatory covenants). See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Financial Condition at September 30,
2009 Deposits and Borrowed Funds
Revolving and Term Loan Facilities; Events of Default for
additional information on the Companys forbearance
agreement and associated risks of not completing all or a
substantial portion of the Capital Plan.
The Banks primary regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago and the Illinois Department of Financial and
Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, have recently
completed a safety and soundness examination of the Bank. As a
result of that examination, we expect that the Federal Reserve
Bank and the Division of Banking will request that the Bank
enter into a formal supervisory action requiring it to take
certain steps intended to improve its overall condition. Such a
supervisory action could require the Bank, among other things,
to: implement the capital restoration plan described below to
strengthen the Banks capital position; develop a plan to
improve the quality of the Banks loan portfolio by
charging off loans and reducing its position in assets
classified as substandard; develop and implement a
plan to enhance the Banks liquidity position; and enhance
the Banks loan underwriting and workout remediation teams.
The final supervisory action may contain other conditions and
targeted time frames as specified by the regulators.
We believe that the successful completion of all or a
significant portion of the Capital Plan will enable the Bank to
meet the requirements of any formal supervisory action with the
regulators and will ensure that the Bank is able to comply with
applicable bank regulations. However, the successful completion
of all or any portion of the Capital Plan is not assured, and if
the Company or the Bank is unable to comply with the terms of
the anticipated supervisory action or any other applicable
regulations, the Company and the Bank could become subject to
additional, heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our
regulators were to take such
139
additional actions, the Company and the Bank could become
subject to various requirements limiting the ability to develop
new business lines, mandating additional capital,
and/or
requiring the sale of certain assets and liabilities. Failure of
the Company to meet these conditions could lead to further
enforcement action on behalf of the regulators. The terms of any
such additional regulatory actions could have a materially
adverse effect on the business of the Bank and the Company.
On August 10, 2009, we announced that Brogan Ptacin and
Kelly J. OKeeffe, each an Executive Vice President of
Midwest Bank, had resigned from Midwest Bank effective
August 14, 2009. Messrs. Ptacin and
OKeeffes responsibilities were assigned to other
members of management.
On July 28, 2009, we announced the implementation of our
Capital Plan. See Background of the Transactions.
On July 28, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Bank and
the Company accepted the resignation of three directors,
reducing the Boards from eleven to eight members. On
September 21, 2009, we announced the death of director
Thomas A. Rosenquist. The boards of the Company and the Bank now
have seven members.
On May 6, 2009, the we announced that Roberto R. Herencia
was named president and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and the Bank, replacing J. J. Fritz, who became senior executive
vice president of the Company. Mr. Herencia, who also was
appointed to the board of directors of the Company, was formerly
president and director of Banco Popular North America based in
Chicago and executive vice president of Popular, Inc., the
parent company. Under Mr. Herencias direction, the
Company immediately tightened its loan underwriting and pricing
criteria, began aggressive balance sheet repositioning
activities, and developed a comprehensive capital plan. Actions
the Company has taken to tighten its loan underwriting include
tightening debt coverage capacity and loan to value advance
rates; enhancing stress testing of new loans assuming both
interest rate and credit risk changes; determining the adequacy
of prior loan repayment sources in both the current market and
potential future more adverse markets; increasing the focus on
secondary source of repayment capacity over and above
collateral; requiring increased equity for lending transactions;
and strengthening credit risk review of guarantor liquidity and
financial net worth to support potential additional needs for
equity or capital to support loan transactions. In addition, the
Bank has identified select industries where there are perceived
higher levels of increased risk or less stability to determine
current loan exposure to these markets and determine proactive
steps to mitigate risk or exit certain industries or credit
relationships. These activities are designed to right-size the
Company by reducing the loan portfolio, both in the aggregate
and within the select industry portfolios noted above, thereby
reducing risk-weighted assets commensurate with the decreasing
amount of available capital. As a result of these activities,
the Company reported asset reductions for the second and third
quarters of 2009 and reductions in risk-weighted assets as
defined for regulatory capital purposes.
We also announced on May 6, 2009, that the Board of
Directors made the decision to suspend the dividend on the
$43.1 million of Series A Preferred Stock; defer the
dividend on the $84.8 million of Series T Preferred
Stock; and defer interest payments on $60.8 million of its
junior subordinated debentures as permitted by the terms of such
debentures. We have no current plans to resume dividend payments
in respect of the Series A Preferred Stock or the
Series T Preferred Stock or interest payments in respect of
its junior subordinated debentures.
In response to the financial crises affecting the overall
banking system and financial markets, on October 3, 2008,
the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, EESA, was
enacted. Under the EESA, the United States Treasury Department,
the U.S. Treasury, has the authority to, among other
things, purchase mortgages, mortgage backed securities and
certain other financial instruments from financial institutions
for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the
U.S. financial markets.
On October 3, 2008 the Troubled Asset Relief Program, TARP,
became effective. The TARP gave the U.S. Treasury authority
to deploy up to $700 billion into the financial system with
an objective of improving liquidity in capital markets. On
October 14, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced plans to
direct $250 billion of this authority into preferred stock
investments in financial institutions. The general terms of this
preferred stock program are as follows for a participant: pay 5%
dividends on the U.S. Treasurys preferred stock for
the
140
first five years and 9% dividends thereafter; cannot increase
common stock dividends for three years while U.S. Treasury
is an investor without their permission; the U.S. Treasury
receives warrants entitling it to buy a participants
common stock equal to 15% of the U.S. Treasurys total
initial investment in the participant; and the participating
companys executives must agree to certain compensation
restrictions, and restrictions on the amount of executive
compensation which is tax deductible and other detailed terms
and conditions. The terms of this preferred stock program could
reduce investment returns to participating companies
stockholders by restricting dividends to common stockholders,
diluting existing stockholders interests, and restricting
capital management practices. The TARP capital purchase program,
CPP, is a voluntary program designed to help healthy
institutions build capital to support the U.S. economy by
increasing the flow of financing to U.S. businesses and
consumers.
Although the Company then exceeded all applicable regulatory
capital requirements, it submitted an application for
participation in the CPP and, on December 5, 2008, it sold
84,784 shares of Series T Preferred Stock to the
U.S. Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of
$84.784 million and issued a warrant to the
U.S. Treasury which will allow it to acquire
4,282,020 shares of its common stock for $2.97 per share.
The Series T Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1
capital and will pay cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per
annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum thereafter. The
Series T Preferred Stock may be redeemed by the Company
after three years. Prior to the end of three years, the
Series T Preferred Stock may be redeemed by the Company
only with proceeds from the sale of qualifying equity
securities. The senior preferred stock is non-voting, other than
class voting rights on certain matters that could amend the
rights of or adversely affect the stock.
If the Company completes one or more qualified equity offerings
on or prior to December 31, 2009 that result in its receipt
of aggregate gross proceeds of not less than
$84.784 million, which is equal to 100% of the aggregate
liquidation preference of the Series T Preferred Stock, the
number of shares of common stock underlying the warrant then
held by the selling securityholders will be reduced by 50% to
2,141,010 shares. The number of shares for which the
warrant may be exercised and the exercise price applicable to
the warrant will be proportionately adjusted in the event the
Company pays stock dividends or makes distributions of its
common stock, subdivide, combine or reclassify outstanding
shares of its common stock. As part of our Capital Plan, we
intend to seek the exchange of the Series T Preferred Stock
for another class of convertible preferred stock to be issued to
the U.S. Treasury. See Background of the
Transactions.
The EESA included a provision for an increase in the amount of
deposits insured by the FDIC to $250,000 until December 2009. On
October 14, 2008, the FDIC announced a new program, the
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, that provides unlimited
deposit insurance on funds in noninterest-bearing transaction
deposit accounts not otherwise covered by the existing deposit
insurance limit of $250,000. The Company has elected to
participate in the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program and
incur a 10 basis point surcharge as a cost of
participation. The behavior of depositors in regard to the level
of FDIC insurance could cause the Companys existing
customers to reduce the amount of deposits held at the Company,
or could cause new customers to open deposit accounts. The level
and composition of the Companys deposit portfolio directly
impacts its funding cost and net interest margin.
The EESA followed, and has been followed by, numerous actions by
the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Congress, U.S. Treasury,
the FDIC, the SEC and others to address the current liquidity
and credit crisis that has followed the
sub-prime
meltdown that commenced in 2007. These measures include
homeowner relief that encourage loan restructuring and
modification; the establishment of significant liquidity and
credit facilities for financial institutions and investment
banks; the lowering of the federal funds rate; emergency action
against short selling practices; a temporary guaranty program
for money market funds; the establishment of a commercial paper
funding facility to provide back-stop liquidity to commercial
paper issuers; and coordinated international efforts to address
illiquidity and other weaknesses in the banking sector.
On February 17, 2009, President Barack Obama signed the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, ARRA, more
commonly known as the economic stimulus or economic recovery
package. ARRA includes a wide variety of programs intended to
stimulate the economy and provide for extensive infrastructure,
energy, health and education needs. In addition, ARRA imposes
new executive compensation and
141
corporate governance limits on current and future participants
in TARP, including the Company, which are in addition to those
previously announced by U.S. Treasury. The new limits
remain in place until the participant has redeemed the preferred
stock sold to U.S. Treasury, which is now permitted under
ARRA without penalty and without the need to raise new capital,
subject to U.S. Treasurys consultation with the
recipients appropriate federal regulator. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Recent
Developments for a discussion of ARRA provisions affecting
financial institutions.
In 2009, the FDIC increased premium assessments to maintain
adequate funding of the Deposit Insurance Fund. Assessment rates
set by the FDIC, effective March 1, 2009, generally range
from 12 to 45 basis points; however, these rates may be
adjusted upward or downward if the institution has unsecured
debt or secured liabilities. As a result, assessment rates for
institutions may range from 7 basis points to
77.5 basis points. These increases in premium assessments
have increased the Companys expenses. In addition, on
May 22, 2009, the FDIC board agreed to impose an emergency
special assessment of 5 basis points on all banks (based on
June 30, 2009 assets) to restore the Deposit Insurance Fund
to an acceptable level. The assessment was paid on
September 30, 2009 and was in addition to the increase in
premiums discussed above. The cost of this emergency special
assessment was $1.7 million. On November 12, 2009, the
FDIC issued new assessment regulations that require FDIC-insured
institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009 their estimated
quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth
quarter 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012; however
certain financial institutions, including the Bank, were
exempted from the new prepayment regulations and will continue
to pay their risk-based assessments on a quarterly basis.
On September 29, 2009, the FDIC issued a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking that, if adopted, would require FDIC-insured
institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based
assessments for the fourth quarter 2009 and for all of 2010,
2011 and 2012, but would supplant the proposed additional
special assessment for 2009.
2008
Developments
The Company recognized a non-cash, non-operating,
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $47.8 million at September 30,
2008 on certain FNMA and FHLMC preferred equity securities
similar to the impairment charge of $17.6 million taken in
the first quarter of 2008. In September 2008, the Company sold a
portion of its FNMA and FHLMC preferred equity securities
recognizing a $16.7 million loss. It also recognized an
impairment charge of $80.0 million on its goodwill
intangible asset based upon an appraisal by an independent third
party. The decline in value was primarily the result of a
decline in market capitalization. During 2008, the Company
recognized net loan charge-offs of $54.1 million and
recorded a $71.8 million loan loss provision, reflecting
managements updated assessments of impaired loans and
concerns about the continued deterioration of economic
conditions. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company also
incurred a $7.1 million loss on the early extinguishment of
debt arising from the prepayment of $130.0 million in FHLB
advances, and recognized a $15.2 million gain on the sale
of real estate.
On December 16, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company
and the Bank elected Percy L. Berger Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Company and the Bank effective
December 31, 2008. Mr. Berger replaced Homer J.
Livingston, Jr. who resigned as a Director and Chairman of
the Company and the Bank effective December 31, 2008.
2007
Developments
On October 1, 2007, the Company completed its acquisition
of Northwest Suburban Bancorp, Inc., Northwest Suburban, in a
cash and stock merger transaction. At acquisition, Northwest
Suburban had total assets of $546.2 million. The agreement
and plan of merger provided that the Companys stock
comprised up to 45% of the purchase price, at an exchange ratio
of 2.4551 shares of Company common stock for each Northwest
Suburban common share, and that the remainder be paid in cash at
the rate of $42.75 for each share of Northwest Suburban common
stock. The Company issued 3.7 million shares of common
stock, paid $81.2 million in cash, and incurred $414,000 in
costs which were capitalized for a total purchase price of
$136.7 million. The Company used the proceeds from a
$75.0 million term note under a borrowing facility it
142
has with a correspondent bank to pay for a portion of the cash
requirement of the acquisition. The term note had an initial
rate of one-month LIBOR plus 140 basis points and matures
on September 28, 2010.
This acquisition added five more branches and made the Company,
based on deposits, the 17th largest bank in the Chicago
area as well as expanding the Companys geographic
footprint in the northwest suburbs. Northwest Suburbans
branch locations in Des Plaines, Lakemoor, Lake Zurich, Mount
Prospect, and North Barrington provided a complimentary
addition to the Companys branches in northwest Cook, Kane,
Lake, and McHenry counties. In addition, the Company believes
that this acquisition contributed to the expansion and
diversification of its loan portfolio, its deposit base, and its
noninterest income.
In December 2007, the Company raised $41.4 million in new
equity capital, net of issuance costs, through an offering of
1,725,000 depositary shares, including the over-allotment
exercised by the underwriters, each representing 1/100th of
a share of its Series A noncumulative redeemable
convertible perpetual preferred stock, at $25.00 per depositary
share. The infusion of capital strengthened the Companys
balance sheet as well as allowed it to partially pay down
balances outstanding on its term note and revolving line of
credit and contribute capital to the Bank.
Strategy
The current near term strategy of the Company is to preserve,
restructure and restore capital in order to realize future
community banking opportunities in the Chicago MSA. To take
advantage of the growth prospects in Chicago, the Company must
first address preservation of capital through a disciplined
business approach. The Company is very focused on its existing
customers and pursuing new core deposit customers. The Company
will consider lending to existing customers under redefined
target market criteria and risk acceptance criteria.
The Company plans on improving pre-tax pre-provision income by
right-sizing the organization and taking an aggressive approach
to expense reduction. Management is implementing such steps
along with actions to restructure and restore capital. Cost
reduction initiatives are expected to eliminate $15 million
in expenses on an annualized basis when compared to 2008
expenses excluding large non-run rate items (goodwill impairment
and loss on extinguishment of debt) This is being accomplished
through a reduction in full time equivalent (FTE) employees
(116 FTE employees, or a 22 percent reduction for the
first nine months ended September 30, 2009), salary
reductions for remaining employees, suspension of the
Companys 401(k) contribution, as well as elimination of
discretionary projects and initiatives and an increased focus on
expense control.
The Company has restructured the special assets group.
Management has devoted additional resources to this group and
engaged an independent firm to actively manage problem loans so
that the Company is properly organized and staffed to address a
portfolio that has experienced significant growth since December
2008.
The Company has a fifty year history of serving communities in
the Chicago MSA. Once the Companys capital position is
restored it will have the ability to further serve the needs of
new and existing local community business customers that allowed
the Midwest to become a $3.5 billion Chicago community bank.
143
Certain information with respect to the Bank and the
Companys nonbank subsidiaries as of September 30,
2009, is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Banking
|
|
Company Subsidiaries
|
|
Headquarters
|
|
Market Area
|
|
Centers or Officer
|
|
|
Banks:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midwest Bank and Trust Company
|
|
Elmwood Park, IL
|
|
Algonquin, Bensenville, Bloomingdale,
Chicago, Des Plaines, Downers Grove,
Elgin, Elmwood Park, Franklin Park,
Glenview, Hinsdale, Inverness,
Long Grove, McHenry,Melrose Park,
Mount Prospect, Norridge,
North Barrington, Roselle, and Union
|
|
|
23
|
|
Non-banks:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBTC Investment Company
|
|
Las Vegas, NV
|
|
*
|
|
|
2
|
|
Midwest Funding, L.L.C.
|
|
Melrose Park, IL
|
|
**
|
|
|
1
|
|
MBHI Capital Trust III
|
|
Melrose Park, IL
|
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
MBHI Capital Trust IV
|
|
Melrose Park, IL
|
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
MBHI Capital Trust V
|
|
Melrose Park, IL
|
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Capital Trust I
|
|
Melrose Park, IL
|
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
Northwest Capital Trust I
|
|
Melrose Park, IL
|
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
Midwest Financial and Investment Services, Inc.
|
|
Elmwood Park, IL
|
|
****
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Provides additional investment portfolio management to the Bank.
|
|
**
|
|
Provides real estate management services to the Bank.
|
|
***
|
|
The trust is a statutory business trust formed as a financing
subsidiary of the Company.
|
|
****
|
|
Provides securities brokerage services.
|
History
The
Bank
Midwest Bank and Trust Company was established in 1959 in
Elmwood Park, Illinois to provide community and commercial
banking services to individuals and businesses in the
neighboring western suburbs of Chicago. The Company has pursued
growth opportunities through acquisitions and the establishment
of new branches. The more recent are described below.
|
|
|
|
|
On July 1, 2006, the Company completed its acquisition of
Royal American. The Company issued 2.9 million common
shares, paid $64.6 million in cash, and incurred $795,000
in costs that were capitalized for a total purchase price of
$129.2 million. Royal American Bank merged into the Bank on
July 1, 2006. Royal American had total assets of
$561.2 million.
|
|
|
|
On October 1, 2007, the Company completed its acquisition
of Northwest Suburban. The Company issued 3.7 million
common shares, paid $81.2 million in cash, and incurred
$414,000 in costs which were capitalized for a total purchase
price of $136.7 million. Mount Prospect National Bank
merged into the Bank on October 1, 2007. Northwest Suburban
had total assets of $546.2 million.
|
|
|
|
During December 2008, the Company closed two unprofitable
branches located in Addison and Lake Zurich, Illinois. The
Company also took steps to relocate its Bucktown and Michigan
Avenue Chicago branches and to open a second branch in the
downtown Chicago business district.
|
Non-bank
Subsidiaries
The Companys non-bank subsidiaries were established to
support the retail and commercial banking activities of the Bank.
144
In August 2002, the Bank established MBTC Investment Company.
This subsidiary was capitalized through the transfer of
investment securities from the Bank and was formed to diversify
management of that portion of the Companys securities
portfolio. In May 2006, MBTC Investment Company established
Midwest Funding, L.L.C. This subsidiary holds real estate assets.
In July 2006, the Bank acquired Midwest Financial and Investment
Services, Inc., Midwest Financial, a registered bank-affiliated
securities broker-dealer and registered investment advisor,
through the Royal American merger. Midwest Financial is
registered with the SEC as a broker-dealer and is a member of
FINRA. It operates a general securities business as an
introducing broker-dealer.
The Company formed four statutory trusts between October 2002
and June 2005 to issue $54.0 million in floating-rate trust
preferred securities. Through the Royal American merger in July
2006, the Company acquired a statutory trust that in March 2004
had issued $10.0 million in trust preferred securities
which have a fixed rate until the optional redemption date of
July 23, 2009 and a floating rate thereafter until
maturity. Through the Northwest Suburban merger in October
2007, the Company acquired a statutory trust that in May 2004
had issued $10.0 million in floating-rate trust preferred
securities. These offerings were pooled private placements
exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to
Section 4(2) thereunder. In November 2007, the Company
redeemed $15.0 million in trust preferred securities
originally issued through MBHI Capital Trust II. The
Company has provided a full, irrevocable, and unconditional
subordinated guarantee of the obligations of the five existing
trusts under the preferred securities. The Company is obligated
to fund dividends on these securities before it can pay
dividends on its shares of common and preferred stock. See
Note 13 to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. These five trusts and their trust preferred
securities are detailed below as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatory
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
Redemption
|
Issuer
|
|
Issue Date
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Date
|
|
Date(1)
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBHI Capital Trust III
|
|
December 19, 2003
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
|
LIBOR+3.00%
|
|
December 30, 2033
|
|
December 30, 2008
|
MBHI Capital Trust IV
|
|
December 19, 2003
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
LIBOR+2.85%
|
|
January 23, 2034
|
|
January 23, 2009
|
MBHI Capital Trust V
|
|
June 7, 2005
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
LIBOR+1.77%
|
|
June 15, 2035
|
|
June 15, 2010
|
Royal Capital Trust I
|
|
March 30, 2004
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
6.62% until
July 23, 2009;
LIBOR+2.75%
thereafter
|
|
July 23, 2034
|
|
July 23, 2009
|
Northwest Suburban Capital Trust I
|
|
May 18, 2004
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
LIBOR+2.70%
|
|
July 23, 2034
|
|
July 23, 2009
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Redeemable at option of the Company.
|
Markets
The largest segments of the Companys customer base live
and work in relatively mature markets in Cook, DuPage, Kane,
Lake, and McHenry Counties. The Company considers its primary
market areas to be those areas immediately surrounding its
offices for retail customers and generally within a
10-20 mile
radius for commercial relationships. The Bank operates 23
banking centers in the Chicago metropolitan area. The
communities in which the Banks offices are located have a
broad spectrum of demographic characteristics. These communities
include a number of densely populated areas as well as suburban
areas, and some extremely high-income areas as well as many
middle-income and some
low-to-moderate
income areas.
Competition
The Company competes in the financial services industry through
the Bank and Midwest Financial. The financial services business
is highly competitive. The Company encounters strong direct
competition for deposits, loans, and other financial services
with the Companys principal competitors including other
commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations,
mutual funds, money market funds, finance companies, credit
unions, mortgage companies, insurance companies and agencies,
private issuers of debt obligations and suppliers of other
investment alternatives, such as securities firms.
145
Several major multi-bank holding companies operate in the
Chicago metropolitan market. Generally, these financial
institutions are significantly larger than the Company and have
access to greater capital and other resources. Over the past few
years, several hundred new bank branches have opened in the
Companys marketplace. Deposit pricing is competitive with
promotional rates frequently offered by competitors. In
addition, many of the Companys non-bank competitors are
not subject to the same degree of regulation as that imposed on
bank holding companies, federally insured banks, and
Illinois-chartered banks. As a result, such non-bank competitors
have advantages over the Company in providing certain services.
The Company addresses these competitive challenges by creating
market differentiation and by maintaining an independent
community bank presence with local decision-making within its
markets. The Bank competes for deposits principally by offering
depositors a variety of deposit programs, convenient office
locations and hours, and other services. The Bank competes for
loan originations primarily through the interest rates and loan
fees charged, the efficiency and quality of services provided to
borrowers, the variety of loan products, and a trained staff of
professional bankers.
The Chicago market is highly competitive making it more
difficult to retain and attract customer relationships. The
Company recognizes this and has initiatives to address the
competition. Part of the Companys marketing strategy is to
create a performance-driven sales environment, increase activity
in its branches, launch a renewed promotional image, and build
and market a strong private banking program. The Company
competes for qualified personnel by offering competitive levels
of compensation, management and employee cash incentive
programs, and by augmenting compensation with stock options and
restricted stock grants pursuant to its stock and incentive
plan. Attracting and retaining high quality employees is
important in enabling the Company to compete effectively for
market share.
Products
and Services
Deposit
Products
Management believes the Bank offers competitive deposit products
and programs which address the needs of customers in each of the
local markets served. These products include:
Checking and Interest-bearing Checking
Accounts.
The Company has developed a range of
different checking account products (e.g., Free Checking and
Business Advantage Checking) designed and priced to meet
specific target segments of the local markets served by each
branch.
Savings and Money Market Accounts.
The Company
offers multiple types of money market accounts and savings
accounts (e.g., Relationship Savings which offers higher rates
with deeper banking relationships).
Time Deposits.
The Company offers a wide range
of innovative time deposits (including traditional and Roth
Individual Retirement Accounts), usually offered at premium
rates with special features to protect the customers
interest earnings in changing interest rate environments.
Lending
Services
The Companys loan portfolio consists of commercial loans,
construction loans, commercial real estate loans, consumer real
estate loans, and consumer loans. Management emphasizes credit
quality and seeks to avoid undue concentrations of loans to a
single industry or based on a single class of collateral. The
Company generally requires personal guarantees of the principal
except on cash secured, state or political subdivision, or
not-for-profit
organization loans. The Company has focused its efforts on
building its lending business in the following areas:
Commercial Loans.
Commercial and industrial
loans are made to small-to medium-sized businesses that are sole
proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations. Generally,
these loans are secured with collateral including accounts
receivable, inventory and equipment. The personal guarantees of
the principals may also be required. Frequently, these loans are
further secured with real estate collateral. Beginning with the
fourth quarter of 2007, owner-occupied commercial real estate
loans, where
146
repayment is not dependent on the real estate collateral, were
reclassified as commercial loans where previously they were
included in the commercial real estate classification.
Construction Loans.
Construction loans include
loans for land development and for commercial and residential
development and improvements. The majority of these loans are
in-market to known and established borrowers. During the past
two years, these types of loans decreased as a percentage of the
loan portfolio to 14.6% at December 31, 2008 from 21.8% at
December 31, 2006.
Commercial Real Estate Loans.
Commercial real
estate loans are loans secured by real estate including
farmland, multifamily residential properties, and other
nonfarm-nonresidential properties. These loans are generally
short-term balloon loans, with fixed or adjustable rate
mortgages and terms of one to five years.
Consumer Real Estate Loans.
Consumer real
estate loans are made to finance residential units that will
house from one to four families. While the Company originates
both fixed and adjustable rate consumer real estate loans, most
medium-term fixed-rate loans originated pursuant to Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac guidelines were sold in the secondary market. In
the normal course of business, the Company retains one-to
five-year adjustable rate loans. The Company exited the
residential mortgage origination business in June 2007.
Home equity lines of credit, included within the Companys
consumer real estate loan portfolio, are secured by the
borrowers home and can be drawn at the discretion of the
borrower. These lines of credit are generally at variable
interest rates. Home equity lines, combined with the outstanding
loan balance of prior mortgage loans, generally do not exceed
80% of the appraised value of the underlying real estate
collateral.
Consumer Loans.
Consumer loans (other than
consumer real estate loans) are collateralized loans to
individuals for various personal purposes such as automobile
financing.
Lending officers are assigned various levels of loan approval
authority based upon their respective levels of experience and
expertise. Loan approval is also subject to the Companys
formal loan policy, as established by the Banks Board of
Directors. The Banks loan policies establish lending
authority and limits on an individual and committee basis. The
loan approval process is designed to facilitate timely decisions
while adhering to policy parameters and risk management targets.
ATMs
The Bank maintains a network of 30 ATM sites generally located
within the Banks local market. All ATMs are owned by the
Bank. Twenty-six of the ATM sites are located at various banking
centers and four are maintained off-site. The Bank is a member
of the STAR, Allpoint/STARsf, and MoneyPass Networks. The
Banks participation in the STARsf/Allpoint and MoneyPass
networks allows customers to have surcharge free access to their
accounts at thousands of ATMs nationwide.
Trust Activities
The Bank offers personal and corporate trust, employee benefit
trust, land trust, and agencies, custody, and escrow services.
As of September 30, 2008, the Bank maintained trust
relationships holding an aggregate market value of
$151.4 million in assets and administered 1,573 land
trust accounts.
Insurance
and Securities Brokerage
The Banks subsidiary, Midwest Financial is registered with
the SEC as a broker-dealer and is a member of FINRA. Midwest
Financial operates a general securities business as an
introducing broker-dealer. The area served by Midwest Financial
is the Chicago metropolitan area. It holds neither customer
accounts nor customers securities. Licensed brokers serve
all branches and provide insurance and investment-related
services, including securities trading, financial planning,
mutual funds sales, fixed and variable rate annuities,
147
and tax-exempt and conventional unit trusts. This activity
furthers one of the Companys strategic goals of increasing
revenues from investment sources to enhance the Companys
profitability.
Employees
As of September 30, 2009, the Company and its subsidiaries
had 420 full-time equivalent employees compared to
536 full-time equivalent employees at December 31,
2008. Management considers its relationship with its employees
to be good.
Properties
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
Companys principal office and bank branches as of
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Leased or
|
|
Location
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Office of the Company and Midwest Bank and
Trust Company Banking Office
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 West North Avenue
Melrose Park, Illinois 60160
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
$
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
Other Midwest Bank and Trust Company Banking Offices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1606 North Harlem Avenue
Elmwood Park, Illinois 60607
|
|
|
1959
|
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
2045 East Algonquin Road
Algonquin, Illinois 60102
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
1000 Tower Lane #125
Bensenville, Illinois 60106
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
236 West Lake Street
Bloomingdale, Illinois 60108
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
1001 Johnson Drive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buffalo Grove, Illinois 60089
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
61 East Van Buren
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, Illinois 60605
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
4012 North Pulaski Road
Chicago, Illinois 60641
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
7227 West Addison Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, Illinois 60634
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
2130 West North Avenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, Illinois 60647
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
500 West Monroe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, Illinois 60601
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2,557
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
1545 Ellinwood Ave
Des Plaines, Illinois 60016
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
5,384
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
927 Curtiss Street
Downers Grove, Illinois 60515
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
645 Tollgate Road
Elgin, Illinois 60123
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
9668 Franklin Avenue
Franklin Park, Illinois 60131
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
1441 Waukegan Road
Glenview, Illinois 60025
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
500 West Chestnut Street
Hinsdale, Illinois 60521
|
|
|
1991
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Leased or
|
|
Location
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1604 West Colonial Parkway
Inverness, Illinois 60067
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
1190 Old McHenry Road
Long Grove, Illinois 60047
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
5555 Bull Valley Road
McHenry, Illinois 60050
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
50 N. Main Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
1730 Park Street
Naperville, Illinois 60563
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
8301 West Lawrence
Norridge, Illinois 60656
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
444 N. Rand Road North
Barrington, Illinois 60010
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
505 North Roselle Road
Roselle, Illinois 60172
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
17622 Depot Street
Union, Illinois 60180
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Land is leased and building is owned.
|
Management believes that the facilities are of sound
construction, in good operating condition, appropriately
insured, and adequately equipped for carrying on the business of
the Company. During June 2009, the Company closed two
unprofitable branches located in Island Lake and Lakemoor,
Illinois.
Legal
Proceedings
The Company and its subsidiaries are from time to time parties
to various legal actions arising in the normal course of
business. Management believes that there is no proceeding
pending against the Company or any of its subsidiaries which, if
determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect on
the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
Supervision
and Regulation
Bank holding companies and banks are extensively regulated under
federal and state law. References under this heading to
applicable statutes or regulations are brief summaries of
portions thereof which do not purport to be complete and which
are qualified in their entirety by reference to those statutes
and regulations. Any change in applicable laws or regulations
may have a material adverse effect on the business of commercial
banks and bank holding companies, including the Company and the
Bank. However, management is not aware of any current
recommendations by any regulatory authority which, if
implemented, would have or would be reasonably likely to have a
material effect on the liquidity, capital resources or
operations of the Company or the Bank. Finally, please remember
that the supervision, regulation and examination of banks and
bank holding companies by bank regulatory agencies are intended
primarily for the protection of depositors rather than
stockholders of banks and bank holding companies.
Recent
Developments
In response to the financial crisis affecting the overall
banking system and financial markets, on October 3, 2008,
the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
(EESA), was enacted. EESA authorized the Secretary
of the U.S. Treasury to, among other things, purchase
mortgages, mortgage-backed securities and certain other
financial instruments from financial institutions pursuant to
the Troubled Asset Relief Program
149
(TARP) for the purpose of stabilizing and providing
liquidity to the U.S. financial markets. On
October 14, 2008, the U.S. Treasury, pursuant to its
authority under TARP, announced the public company Capital
Purchase Program (CPP), pursuant to which the
U.S. Treasury would provide capital to viable financial
institutions through the purchase of preferred stock on
standardized terms, which includes issuing warrants to the
U.S. Treasury for future purchases of common stock.
As indicated above, on December 5, 2008, the Company sold
84,784 shares of Series T Preferred Stock to the
U.S. Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of
$84.784 million and issued a warrant to the
U.S. Treasury to acquire 4,282,020 shares of its
common stock for $2.97 per share pursuant to the Letter
Agreement between the Company and the U.S. Treasury. As a
financial institution participating in the CPP, the Company is
subject and must agree to certain restrictions, including
restrictions on dividends, stock redemptions and repurchases,
and executive compensation.
Prior to the earlier of the third anniversary of the CPP
investment or the date on which the U.S. Treasurys
CPP investment has been fully redeemed or transferred, the
financial institution may not increase common dividends without
the consent of the U.S. Treasury. In addition, the
financial institution may not pay dividends on common stock
unless the financial institution has paid dividends on the CPP
preferred stock. If the financial institution does not pay
dividends on the senior preferred stock for six dividend
periods, the U.S. Treasury will have the right to elect two
members to the board of directors. On May 6, 2009, the
Company determined to defer dividend payments on the
Series T Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury
under the CPP.
Prior to the earlier of the third anniversary of the CPP
investment or the date on which the U.S. Treasurys
CPP investment has been fully redeemed or transferred, the
financial institution may not repurchase other equity securities
or trust preferred securities without the consent of the
U.S. Treasury, except repurchases in the ordinary course
related to employee benefit plans in a manner consistent with
past practice, certain market-making and related transactions by
a broker-dealer subsidiary of the financial institution, certain
custodian or trustee transactions for another beneficial owner,
or certain agreements pre-dating participation in the CPP.
On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, (ARRA), more
commonly known as the economic stimulus or economic recovery
package. Among other things, ARRA imposes executive compensation
and corporate governance limits on current and future
participants in TARP, including the Company, through amendments
to EESA executive compensation provisions. The new limits remain
in place until the participant has redeemed the preferred stock
sold to U.S. Treasury, which is now permitted under ARRA
without penalty and without the need to raise new capital,
subject to U.S. Treasurys consultation with the
recipients appropriate federal banking regulator.
In general, the executive compensation rules applicable to
financial institutions pursuant to EESA, as amended by ARRA, and
the interim final rules promulgated thereunder, include the
following restrictions, requirements and provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
Prohibition on executive compensation agreements that encourage
senior executive officers and certain other highly compensated
employees to take unnecessary and excessive risks;
|
|
|
|
Recovery of incentive compensation payments paid to senior
executive officers and certain other highly compensated
employees if such payments are subsequently determined to be
based on materially inaccurate financial results;
|
|
|
|
Prohibition on making golden parachute payments to senior
executive officers and certain other highly compensated
employees;
|
|
|
|
Limitation on the federal tax deduction for compensation paid to
senior executive officers of $500,000.
|
|
|
|
Restrictions on paying or accruing any bonus, retention award or
incentive compensation to certain highly compensated employees,
subject to certain exceptions for (i) amounts payable in
long-term restricted stock that does not fully vest until
repayment of TARP assistance or (ii) payments required to
be made pursuant to written employment contracts executed on or
before February 11, 2009;
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
Requirement that participating financial institutions establish
an independent compensation committee of its board of directors
to review, discuss and evaluate employee compensation plans;
|
|
|
|
Requirement that participating financial institutions create a
company-wide policy regarding excessive or luxury expenditures;
|
|
|
|
Requirement that participating financial institutions permit a
separate, nonbinding shareholder vote to approve the
compensation of executive officers;
|
|
|
|
Requirement that the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the participating financial institution provide a
written certification of compliance with certain executive
compensation and corporate governance procedures in annual
securities filings; and
|
|
|
|
Provision allowing U.S. Treasury to review bonuses,
retention awards and other compensation paid to senior executive
officers before the enactment of ARRA to determine whether any
payments were inconsistent with the executive compensation
restrictions of EESA, as amended, or TARP were otherwise
contrary to the public interest.
|
The Company has agreed that, until such time as the
U.S. Treasury ceases to own any of the Companys debt
or equity securities acquired pursuant to the Letter Agreement,
the Company will take all necessary actions to ensure that its
benefit plans with respect to its senior executive officers and
certain other highly compensated officers comply with
Section 111(b) of EESA as implemented by any guidance or
regulation under EESA.
In addition, the Company expects that its participation in the
CPP will subject it to increased oversight by the
U.S. Treasury, federal banking regulators and Congress.
Under the terms of the CPP, the U.S. Treasury has the power
to unilaterally amend the terms of the purchase agreement to the
extent required to comply with changes in applicable federal law
and to inspect the Companys corporate books and records
through its primary federal regulator.
On January 12, 2009, the FDIC announced that state
nonmember institutions should implement a process to monitor the
use of capital injections, liquidity support
and/or
financing guarantees obtained through recent financial stability
programs established by the U.S. Treasury, the FDIC and the
Federal Reserve. In particular, the FDIC indicated that the
monitoring processes should help determine how participation in
these federal programs has assisted institutions in supporting
prudent lending
and/or
supporting efforts to work with existing borrowers to avoid
unnecessary foreclosures. The FDIC has encouraged institutions
to include a summary of this information in stockholder and
public reports, annual reports and financial statements, as
applicable. While the Company is not subject to this directive,
it is foreseeable that similar requirements may be imposed on
the Company by its primary federal regulator.
In addition, Congress may adopt legislation impacting financial
institutions that obtain funding under the CPP or change lending
practices that legislators believe led to the current economic
situation. Such provisions could restrict or require changes to
the Companys lending or governance practices or increase
governmental oversight of our businesses. See Item 1.
Business Supervision and Regulation and
Item 1A. Risk Factors The impact on us of
recently enacted legislation and government programs to
stabilize the financial markets cannot be predicted at this
time.
EESA followed, and has been followed by, numerous actions by the
Federal Reserve, the U.S. Congress, U.S. Treasury, the
FDIC, the SEC and others to address the current liquidity and
credit crisis that commenced in 2007. These measures include
homeowner relief that encourages loan restructuring and
modification, the establishment of significant liquidity and
credit facilities for financial institutions and investment
banks, the lowering of the federal funds rate, emergency action
against short selling practices, a temporary guaranty program
for money market funds, the establishment of a commercial paper
funding facility to provide back-stop liquidity to commercial
paper issuers, and coordinated international efforts to address
illiquidity and other weaknesses in the banking sector.
On February 25, 2009, the U.S. Treasury announced the
Capital Assistance Program (CAP), pursuant to its
authority under EESA, applicable to publiclyheld companies. CAP
consists of two components. First, the
151
U.S. Treasury would conduct a coordinated supervisory
capital assessment exercise for each banking organization whose
assets exceed $100 billion. Second, the U.S. Treasury
may purchase mandatory convertible preferred stock from
qualifying financial institutions in order to create a bridge to
private capital in the future. CAP is supplemental to the
various programs enacted by the U.S. Government and does
not replace any existing program. Pursuant to CAP, qualifying
institutions may issue mandatory convertible securities in an
amount up to 2% of the institutions risk-weighted assets.
In addition, institutions participating in the CPP and that have
issued preferred under the CPP, in an amount up to 3% or
risk-weighted assets, may apply to issue mandatory convertible
securities under CAP in an amount up to 5% of risk-weighted
assets, so long as proceeds from the issuance of the mandatory
convertible securities are used to redeem the original CPP
investment. CAP participants must agree to a similar set of
restrictions as those under CPP, including restrictions on
executive compensation, dividends, stock redemptions and
repurchases. On November 9, 2009, the U.S. Treasury
announced that the CAP had been closed with no investments
having been made by the U.S. Treasury under the program.
Bank
Holding Company Regulation
The Company is registered as a bank holding company
with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
Federal Reserve) and, accordingly, is subject to
supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve under the Bank
Holding Company Act and the regulations issued thereunder
(collectively referred to as the BHC Act). The
Company is required to file with the Federal Reserve periodic
reports and such additional information as the Federal Reserve
may require pursuant to the BHC Act. The Federal Reserve
examines the Company and the Bank, and may examine the
Companys other subsidiaries.
The BHC Act requires prior Federal Reserve approval for, among
other things, the acquisition by a bank holding company of
direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the
voting shares or substantially all the assets of any bank, or
for a merger or consolidation of a bank holding company with
another bank holding company. With certain exceptions, the BHC
Act prohibits a bank holding company from acquiring direct or
indirect ownership or control of voting shares of any company
which is not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging
directly or indirectly in any activity other than banking or
managing or controlling banks or performing services for its
authorized subsidiaries. A bank holding company may, however,
engage in or acquire an interest in a company that engages in
activities which the Federal Reserve has determined, by
regulation or order, to be so closely related to banking or
managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident
thereto, such as performing functions or activities that may be
performed by a trust company, or acting as an investment or
financial advisor. The Federal Reserve, however, expects bank
holding companies to maintain strong capital positions while
experiencing growth. In addition, the Federal Reserve, as a
matter of policy, may require a bank holding company to be
well-capitalized at the time of filing an
acquisition application and upon consummation of the acquisition.
Under the BHC Act, the Company and the Bank are prohibited from
engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with an
extension of credit, lease, sale of property or furnishing of
services. This means that, except with respect to traditional
banking products, the Company may not condition a
customers purchase of one of its services on the purchase
of another service.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act allows bank holding companies to
elect to become financial holding companies. Financial Holding
Companies may engage in, or become affiliates with companies
engaging in, a full range of financial activities, including
banking, certain insurance activities, securities activities and
merchant banking activities.
Under the Illinois Banking Act, any person (or person acting in
concert) who acquires 25% or more of the Companys stock
may be required to obtain the prior approval of the Illinois
Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (the
IDFPR). Under the Change in Bank Control Act, a
person may be required to obtain prior approval from the Federal
Reserve before acquiring the power to directly or indirectly
control the management, operations or policies of the Company or
before acquiring 10% or more of any class of its outstanding
voting stock.
152
It is the policy of the Federal Reserve that the Company is
expected to act as a source of financial and managerial strength
to the Bank and to commit resources to support the Bank. The
Federal Reserve takes the position that in implementing this
policy, it may require the Company to provide such support when
the Company otherwise would not consider it advisable to do so.
The Federal Reserve has adopted risk-based capital requirements
for assessing bank holding company capital adequacy. These
standards define regulatory capital and establish minimum ratios
in relation to assets, both on an aggregate basis and as
adjusted for credit risks and off-balance-sheet exposures. The
Federal Reserves risk-based guidelines apply on a
consolidated basis to any bank holding company with consolidated
assets of $500 million or more. The risk-based guidelines
also apply on a consolidated basis to any bank holding company
with consolidated assets of less than $500 million if the
holding company is engaged in significant nonbanking activities
either directly or through a nonbank subsidiary; conducts
significant off-balance-sheet activities (including
securitization and asset management or administration) either
directly or through a nonbank subsidiary; or has a material
amount of debt or equity securities outstanding (other than
trust preferred securities) that are registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Under the Federal Reserves capital guidelines, bank
holding companies are required to maintain a minimum ratio of
qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8%, of which
4% must be in the form of Tier 1 capital. The Federal
Reserve also requires a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1
capital to total assets of 3% for strong bank holding companies,
defined as those bank holding companies rated a composite
1 under the rating system used by the Federal
Reserve. For all other bank holding companies, the minimum ratio
of Tier 1 capital to total assets is 4%. Under its capital
adequacy guidelines, the Federal Reserve emphasizes that the
foregoing standards are supervisory minimums and that banking
organizations are expected to operate well above the minimum
ratios. Bank holding companies with supervisory, financial,
operational or managerial weaknesses, as well as those that are
anticipating or experiencing significant growth, are expected to
maintain capital positions substantially above the minimum
levels.
The Federal Reserves capital guidelines classify bank
holding company capital into two categories. Tier 1, or
core capital, generally is defined as the sum of
eligible core capital elements, less any amounts of goodwill and
other items that are required to be deducted in accordance with
the Federal Reserve capital guidelines. Eligible Tier 1 or
core capital elements consist of qualifying common
stockholders equity, qualifying noncumulative perpetual
preferred stock (including related surplus), senior perpetual
preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP
(including related surplus), minority interests related to
qualifying common or noncumulative perpetual preferred stock
directly issued by a consolidated U.S. depository
institution or foreign bank subsidiary, and restricted core
capital elements. Tier 1 capital must represent at least
50% of a bank holding companys qualifying total capital.
In addition, applicable capital regulations require that the
majority of Tier 1 capital must consist of common stock.
For purposes of determining bank holding company Tier 1
capital, restricted core capital elements include cumulative
perpetual preferred stock (including related interests),
minority interests related to qualified perpetual preferred
stock directly issued by a consolidated U.S. depository
institution or foreign bank subsidiary, minority interests
related to qualifying common stockholders, equity or perpetual
preferred stock issued by a consolidated subsidiary that is
neither a U.S. depository institution or a foreign bank,
and qualifying trust preferred securities.
The Federal Reserve capital guidelines limit the amount of
restrictive core elements that a bank holding
company may include in Tier 1 capital. Until March 31,
2011, the aggregate amount of restrictive core
elements consisting of cumulative perpetual preferred stock
(including related surplus) and qualifying trust preferred
securities that a bank holding company may include in
Tier 1 capital is limited to 25% of the sum of
(i) qualifying common stockholder equity,
(ii) qualifying noncumulative and cumulative perpetual
preferred stock (including related surplus),
(iii) qualifying minority interest in the equity accounts
of consolidated subsidiaries and (iv) qualifying trust
preferred securities.
After March 31, 2011, the aggregate amount of all
restricted core capital elements that may be included by a bank
holding company as Tier 1 capital must not exceed 25% of
the sum of all core capital elements, including restricted core
capital elements, net of goodwill less any associated deferred
tax liability.
153
The excess of restricted core capital not included in
Tier 1 may generally be included in the Tier 2 capital
calculation. After March 31, 2011, however, the aggregate
of excess qualifying trust preferred securities, excess
Class C minority interests, term subordinated debt
(excluding mandatory convertible debt) and limited life
preferred stock that may be treated as Tier 2 capital is
limited to 50% of Tier 1 capital. Amounts of these
instruments in excess of this limit, although not included in
Tier 2 capital, will be taken into consideration by the
Federal Reserve in its overall assessment of a bank holding
companys funding and financial condition.
Eligible Tier 2 capital, or supplementary
capital, includes allowance for loan and lease losses
(subject to limitations); perpetual preferred stock and related
surplus, hybrid capital instruments, perpetual debt and
mandatory convertible debt securities; term subordinated debt
and intermediate-term preferred stock, including related surplus
(subject to limits); and unrealized holding gains on equity
securities (subject to limitations). The maximum amount of
Tier 2 capital that may be included in a bank holding
companys total capital is limited to 100% of Tier 1
capital, net of goodwill, other intangible assets, interest-only
strips receivables and nonfinancial equity investments that are
required to be deducted under the Federal Reserve capital
guidelines.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had regulatory
capital that did not meet the Federal Reserves minimum
requirements due to the Companys total capital to
risk-weighted assets ratio of 7.95%. The Company had a
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 6.05% and a
leverage ratio of 4.26%. See Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Capital Resources.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 implemented legislative reforms
intended to prevent corporate and accounting fraud. In addition
to the establishment of a new accounting oversight board which
enforces auditing, quality control and independence standards
and is funded by fees from all publicly traded companies, the
legislation and the related regulations restrict the providing
of both auditing and consulting services by accounting firms. To
ensure auditor independence, any nonaudit services being
provided to an audit client require preapproval by the
companys audit committee. In addition, audit partners must
be rotated. The legislation and the related regulations require
the principal chief executive officer and the principal chief
financial officer to certify to the accuracy of periodic reports
filed with the SEC and subject such officers to civil and
criminal penalties if they knowingly or willfully violate this
certification requirement. In addition, legal counsel is
required to report evidence of a material violation of the
securities laws or a breach of fiduciary duty by a company to
its chief executive officer or its chief legal officer, and if
such officer does not appropriately respond, legal counsel is to
report such evidence to the audit committee or other similar
committee of the board of directors or the board itself.
The legislation provides for disgorgement of bonuses issued to
top executives prior to restatement of a companys
financial statements if such restatement was due to corporate
misconduct. Executives are also prohibited from insider trading
during pension fund blackout periods, and loans to
company executives are restricted. Pursuant to the legislation
and related regulations, public companies must immediately
disclose any material changes in their financial condition or
operations. Directors and executive officers must also provide
information for most changes in ownership in a companys
securities within two business days of the change.
The legislation and the related regulations also increase the
oversight of, and codifies certain requirements relating to,
audit committees of public companies and how such committees
interact with a companys registered public accounting
firm. Audit committee members must be independent and are barred
from accepting consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees
from the company. In addition, companies must disclose whether
at least one member of the committee is a financial
expert as defined by the SEC and, if not, why not. The SEC
has also prescribed rules requiring inclusion of an internal
control report and assessment by management in the annual report
to stockholders. The registered public accounting firm issues an
audit report expressing an opinion on the fair presentation of
the financial statements and on the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting.
As a bank holding company, the Company is primarily dependent on
dividend distributions from its operating subsidiaries for its
income. Federal and state statutes and regulations impose
restrictions on the payment of dividends by the Company and the
Bank.
154
Federal Reserve policy provides that, as a general matter, a
bank holding company should eliminate, defer or severely limit
the payment of dividends if (i) the bank holding
companys net income over the prior four quarters is not
sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (ii) the bank
holding companys prospective rate of earnings retention is
not consistent with the bank holding companys capital
needs and overall current and prospective financial condition;
and (iii) the bank holding company will not meet, or is in
danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy
ratios. The Federal Reserve may find that the bank holding
company is operating in an unsafe and unsound manner if the bank
holding company does not comply with the Federal Reserve
dividend policy and may use its enforcement powers to limit or
prohibit the payment of dividends by bank holding companies.
Delaware law also places certain limitations on the ability of
the Company to pay dividends. For example, if the capital of the
bank holding company has been diminished to an amount less than
the aggregate amount of capital represented by the issued and
outstanding stock, a dividend may not be paid until the
deficiency in capital is repaired. Because a major source of the
Companys revenues is dividends the Company receives and
expects to receive from the Bank, the Companys ability to
pay dividends to stockholders is likely to be dependent on the
amount of dividends paid by the Bank. No assurance can be given
that the Bank will pay such dividends to the Company on its
stock. Because the Bank had a net loss of $151.1 million in
2008, the Bank will only be able to pay dividends in 2009 upon
receipt of regulatory approval. In addition, under the terms of
the Companys decision to defer dividend payments on the
Series T Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury
under the CPP, the Company will only be able to pay common stock
dividends with the approval of the U.S. Treasury.
Bank
Regulation
Under Illinois law, the Bank is subject to supervision and
examination by the IDFPR. The Bank is a member of the Federal
Reserve System and as such is also subject to examination by the
Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve also supervises compliance
with the provisions of federal law and regulations, which place
restrictions on loans by member banks to their directors,
executive officers and other controlling persons. The Bank is
also a member of the FHLB of Chicago and may be subject to
examination by the FHLB of Chicago. Any affiliates of the Bank
and the Company are also subject to examination by the Federal
Reserve and the IDFPR.
The deposits of the Bank are insured by the FDIC Deposit
Insurance Fund (DIF), under the provisions of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA), and the Bank is,
therefore, also subject to supervision and examination by the
FDIC. The FDIA requires that the appropriate federal regulatory
authority approve any merger
and/or
consolidation by or with an insured bank, as well as the
establishment or relocation of any bank or branch office. The
FDIA also gives the Federal Reserve and other federal bank
regulatory agencies the power to issue cease and desist orders
against banks, holding companies or persons regarded as
institution affiliated parties. A cease and desist
order can either prohibit such entities from engaging in certain
unsafe and unsound banking activity or can require them to take
certain affirmative action.
Furthermore, banks are affected by the credit policies of the
Federal Reserve, which regulates the national supply of bank
credit. Such regulation influences the overall growth of bank
loans, investments and deposits and may also affect interest
rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. The monetary
policies of the Federal Reserve have had a significant effect on
the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are
expected to continue to do so in the future.
As discussed above, under Illinois law the Bank is subject to
supervision and examination by the IDFPR, and, as a member of
the Federal Reserve System, by the Federal Reserve. Each of
these regulatory agencies conducts routine, periodic
examinations of the Bank and the Company.
Financial
Institution Regulation
Transactions with Affiliates.
Transactions
between a bank and its holding company or other affiliates are
subject to various restrictions imposed by state and federal
regulatory agencies. Such transactions include loans and other
extensions of credit, purchases of securities and other assets
and payments of fees or other
155
distributions. In general, these restrictions limit the amount
of transactions between a bank and an affiliate of such bank, as
well as the aggregate amount of transactions between a bank and
all of its affiliates, impose collateral requirements in some
cases and require transactions with affiliates to be on terms
comparable to those for transactions with unaffiliated entities.
Dividend Limitations.
As a state member bank,
the Bank may not, without the approval of the Federal Reserve,
declare a dividend if the total of all dividends declared in a
calendar year exceeds the total of its net income for that year
and the retained net income of the prior two calendar years,
less any required transfers to the surplus account. Under
Illinois law, the Bank may not pay dividends in an amount
greater than its net profits then on hand, after deducting
losses and bad debts. For the purpose of determining the amount
of dividends that an Illinois bank may pay, bad debts are
defined as debts upon which interest is past due and unpaid for
a period of six months or more, unless such debts are
well-secured and in the process of collection.
In addition to the foregoing, the ability of the Company and the
Bank to pay dividends may be affected by the various minimum
capital requirements and the capital and noncapital standards
established under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvements Act of 1991, (FDICIA), as described below. The
right of the Company, its stockholders and its creditors to
participate in any distribution of the assets or earnings of its
subsidiaries is further subject to the prior claims of creditors
of the respective subsidiaries.
Capital Requirements.
State member banks are
required by the Federal Reserve to maintain certain minimum
capital levels. The Federal Reserves capital guidelines
for state member banks require state member banks to maintain a
minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-weighted
assets of 8%, of which at least 4% must be in the form of
Tier 1 capital. In addition, the Federal Reserve requires a
minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of
3% for strong banking institutions (those rated a composite
1 under the Federal Reserves rating system)
and a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total
assets of 4% for all other banks.
At September 30, 2009, the Bank has a Tier 1 capital
to risk-weighted assets ratio and a total capital to
risk-weighted assets ratio which meet the above requirements.
The Bank has a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio
of 8.88% and a total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of
10.17%. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Capital Resources.
Standards for Safety and Soundness.
The
Federal Reserve and the other federal bank regulatory agencies
have adopted a set of guidelines prescribing safety and
soundness standards pursuant to FDICIA. The guidelines establish
general standards relating to internal controls and information
systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit
underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and
compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines
require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices
to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the
guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an
unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as
excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or
disproportionate to the services performed by an executive
officer, employee, director or principal stockholder. In
addition, the Federal Reserve adopted regulations that
authorize, but do not require, the Federal Reserve to order an
institution that has been given notice by the Federal Reserve
that it is not satisfying any of such safety and soundness
standards to submit a compliance plan. If, after being so
notified, an institution fails to submit an acceptable
compliance plan or fails in any material respect to implement an
accepted compliance plan, the Federal Reserve must issue an
order directing action to correct the deficiency and may issue
an order directing other actions of the types to which an
undercapitalized association is subject under the prompt
corrective action provisions of FDICIA. If an institution
fails to comply with such an order, the Federal Reserve may seek
to enforce the order in judicial proceedings and to impose civil
money penalties. The Federal Reserve and the other federal bank
regulatory agencies also adopted guidelines for asset quality
and earnings standards.
A range of other provisions in FDICIA include requirements
applicable to closure of branches; additional disclosures to
depositors with respect to terms and interest rates applicable
to deposit accounts; uniform regulations for extensions of
credit secured by real estate; restrictions on activities of and
investments by state-chartered banks; modification of accounting
standards to conform to generally accepted accounting
principles, including the reporting of off-balance-sheet items
and supplemental disclosure of estimated fair market value
156
of assets and liabilities in financial statements filed with the
banking regulators; increased penalties in making or failing to
file assessment reports with the FDIC; greater restrictions on
extensions of credit to directors, officers and principal
stockholders; and increased reporting requirements on
agricultural loans and loans to small businesses.
In addition, the federal banking agencies adopted a final rule,
which modified the risk-based capital standards to provide for
consideration of interest rate risk when assessing the capital
adequacy of a bank. Under this rule, the Federal Reserve and the
FDIC must explicitly include a banks exposure to declines
in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest
rates as a factor in evaluating a banks capital adequacy.
The federal banking agencies also have adopted a joint agency
policy statement providing guidance to banks for managing
interest rate risk. The policy statement emphasizes the
importance of adequate oversight by management and a sound risk
management process. The assessment of interest rate risk
management made by the banks examiners will be
incorporated into the banks overall risk management rating
and used to determine the effectiveness of management.
As part of their ongoing supervisory monitoring process, the
federal regulatory agencies use certain criteria to identify
institutions that are potentially exposed to significant loan
concentration risks. In 2007, the regulatory agencies issued new
guidelines relating to commercial real estate (CRE), lending
risks. An institution experiencing rapid growth in CRE lending,
having notable exposure to a specific type of CRE or approaching
or exceeding the specified CRE supervisory criteria may be
subjected to further supervisory analysis. Because these are
guidelines, the supervisory monitoring criteria do not
constitute limits on an institutions lending activity but
rather serve as high-level indicators to identify institutions
potentially exposed to CRE concentration risk. The criteria do
not constitute a safe harbor for institutions if
other risk indicators are present. Existing capital adequacy
guidelines require an institution to hold capital commensurate
with the level and nature of the risks to which it is exposed.
Regulatory agencies may consider the level and nature of
inherent risk in an institutions CRE portfolio along with
other factors to determine if an institution is maintaining an
adequate capital level to serve as a buffer against unexpected
losses and can require such an institution to develop a plan for
reducing its CRE concentrations or for increasing or maintaining
capital appropriate to the level and nature of its lending
concentration risk.
Prompt Corrective Action.
FDICIA requires the
federal banking regulators to take prompt corrective action with
respect to depository institutions that fall below minimum
capital standards and prohibits any depository institution from
making any capital distribution that would cause it to be
undercapitalized. Institutions that are not adequately
capitalized may be subject to a variety of supervisory actions,
including but not limited to, restrictions on growth, investment
activities, capital distributions and affiliate transactions,
and will be required to submit a capital restoration plan which,
to be accepted by the regulators, must be guaranteed in part by
any company having control of the institution (such as the
Company). In other respects, FDICIA provides for enhanced
supervisory authority, including greater authority for the
appointment of a conservator or receiver for undercapitalized
institutions. The capital-based prompt corrective action
provisions of FDICIA and their implementing regulations apply to
FDIC-insured depository institutions. However, federal banking
agencies have indicated that, in regulating bank holding
companies, the agencies may take appropriate action at the
holding company level based on their assessment of the
effectiveness of supervisory actions imposed on subsidiary
insured depository institutions pursuant to the prompt
corrective action provisions of FDICIA.
FDIC Insurance Premiums on Deposit
Accounts.
The Bank is required to pay deposit
insurance premiums based on the risk it poses to the DIF. The
FDIC has authority to raise or lower assessment rates on insured
deposits in order to achieve statutorily required reserve ratios
in the insurance funds and to impose special additional
assessments.
On February 8, 2006, President Bush signed into law the
Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the Reform
Act). Pursuant to the Reform Act, the FDIC merged the Bank
Insurance Fund, (BIF), and the Savings Association
Insurance Fund, (SAIF), to form the DIF on
March 31, 2006. The FDIC maintains the DIF by assessing
depository institutions an insurance premium. The FDIC annually
sets the reserve level of the DIF within a statutory range
between 1.15% and 1.50% of insured deposits. The FDIC set the
reserve level
157
at 1.25% for 2008. If the reserve level of the insurance fund
falls below 1.15%, or is expected to do so within six months,
the FDIC must adopt a restoration plan that will restore the DIF
to a 1.15% ratio generally within five years. If the reserve
level exceeds 1.35%, the FDIC may return some of the excess in
the form of dividends to insured institutions.
Effective January 1, 2007 the FDIC introduced a new
risk-based system for deposit insurance premium assessments.
This risk-based assessment system established four Risk
Categories. Risk Category I includes
well-capitalized
institutions that are financially sound with only a few minor
weaknesses. Approximately 95% of
FDIC-insured
institutions fall within Risk Category I. In 2008 Risk Category
I institutions paid quarterly assessments for deposit insurance
at annual rates of 5 to 7 basis points for every $100 of
deposit accounts. The 2008 rates for FDIC-insured institutions
that were assigned Risk Categories II, III and IV paid
an annual rate of 7, 28 and 43 basis points, respectively,
for every $100 of deposit accounts.
During 2008, the FDIC determined that the DIF reserve ratio had
fallen below the minimum 1.15% threshold and therefore announced
a DIF reserve restoration plan. In connection with this
restoration plan, the FDIC increased the 2009 first quarter DIF
premium assessment rates uniformly by 7 basis points.
Therefore, FDIC-insured institutions that are assigned as Risk
Category I will pay a first quarter 2009 assessment of between
12 and 14 basis points for every $100 of deposit accounts.
FDIC-insured institutions that are assigned Risk Categories
II, III and IV will pay a first quarter 2009
assessment of 17, 35 and 50 basis points, respectively.
On February, 27, 2009, the FDIC Board of Directors adopted a new
final rule that modifies the risk-based assessment fee system
applied to FDIC insured financial institutions. The new final
rule established new base assessment rates beginning on
March 1, 2009. The new initial base assessment rates are as
follows:
Initial
Base Assessment Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Category I
|
|
Risk Category II
|
|
Risk Category III
|
|
Risk Category IV
|
|
12-16
|
|
22
|
|
32
|
|
45
|
In addition, the new final rule introduced three possible
adjustments to the base assessment rates. The new final rule
provides for a possible adjustments that decreases the base
assessment rate up to five basis points for long-term unsecured
debt, including senior unsecured debt (other than debt
guaranteed under the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program) and
subordinated debt and, for small institutions, a portion of
Tier 1 capital. The new rule also provides for a potential
adjusted increase of the base assessment rate in an amount of up
to 50% of an institutions prior assessment rate for
secured liabilities that exceed 25% of its domestic deposits. In
addition, a possible adjustment to the base rate assessment of
up to an additional deposits in excess of 10% of their domestic
deposits.
After applying all possible adjustments, minimum and maximum
total assessment rates for each risk category are as follows:
Total
Base Assessment Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk
|
|
|
Risk
|
|
|
Risk
|
|
|
Risk
|
|
|
|
Category I
|
|
|
Category II
|
|
|
Category III
|
|
|
Category IV
|
|
|
Initial Base Assessment Rate
|
|
|
12-16
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Unsecured Debt Adjustment
|
|
|
(5-0)
|
|
|
|
(5-0)
|
|
|
|
(5-0)
|
|
|
|
(5-0)
|
|
Secured Liability Adjustment
|
|
|
0-8
|
|
|
|
0-11
|
|
|
|
0-16
|
|
|
|
0-22.5
|
|
Brokered Deposit Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-10
|
|
|
|
0-10
|
|
|
|
0-10
|
|
Total Base Assessment Rate
|
|
|
7-24.0
|
|
|
|
17-43.0
|
|
|
|
27-58.0
|
|
|
|
40-77.5
|
|
In addition to the new final rule regarding base rate
assessments, the FDIC, on May 22, 2009, adopted a final
rule with respect to an emergency assessment to be imposed on
insured depository institutions (Emergency Assessment
Rule) to bolster the DIF. Pursuant to the Emergency
Assessment Rule, the emergency assessment will levy an
assessment of five basis points of each insured depository
institutions assets, less its Tier 1 capital, as of
June 30, 2009. This emergency assessment was collected
September 30, 2009. The FDIC has indicated that it is
probable that an additional emergency assessment will be
necessary in the fourth quarter of 2009. On September 29,
158
2009, the FDIC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that, if
adopted, would require FDIC-insured institutions to prepay their
estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth
quarter 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012, but would
supplant the proposed additional special assessment for 2009.
In addition to the FDIC insurance program, the Bank is required
to pay a Financing Corporation, (FICO) assessment (on a
semi-annual basis) in order to share in the payment of interest
due on bonds used to provide liquidity to the savings and loan
industry in the 1980s. During 2008, the Banks FICO
assessment totaled $275,000, or 1.12 basis points of its
insured deposits.
The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any insured
depository institution, including the Bank, if it determines
after a hearing that the institution has engaged or is engaging
in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound
condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable
law, regulation, order or any condition imposed by an agreement
with the FDIC. It also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily
during the hearing process for the permanent termination of
insurance, if the institution has no tangible capital. If
deposit insurance is terminated, the accounts at the institution
at the time of the termination, less subsequent withdrawals,
shall continue to be insured for a period of six months to two
years, as determined by the FDIC. There are no pending
proceedings to terminate the deposit insurance of the Bank. The
management of the Bank does not know of any practice, condition
or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.
On October 3, 2008, the EESA was signed into law. EESA
included a provision for an increase in the amount of deposits
insured by the FDIC to $250,000 until December 2009. Pursuant to
the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act, signed by President
Obama on May 20, 2009, the $250,000 limit has been extended
to December 31, 2013. On October 14, 2008, the FDIC
announced a new program, the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee
Program (TLGP), which provides unlimited deposit
insurance on funds in non-interest-bearing transaction deposit
accounts otherwise covered by the existing deposit insurance
limit of $250,000. The Bank has elected to participate in the
program and will be assessed a 10 basis point surcharge for
its participation through December 31, 2009. On
August 26, 2009, the FDIC extended the transaction deposit
account program until June 30, 2010. The fees for
participating in the program after December 31, 2009, will
range from 15 basis points to 25 basis points based on
the institutions Risk Category. Institutions currently
participating in the program have the opportunity to opt out of
the extension by electing to do so on or before November 2,
2009. The Bank has elected to participate in the extended
program.
Another component of the TLGP is a voluntary program whereby the
FDIC will temporarily guarantee newly issued senior unsecured
debt of an eligible financial institution up to 125% of the par
or face value of a debt that is scheduled to mature before
October 31, 2009. The FDIC implemented an additional
assessment for institutions that elected to participate in the
Debt Guarantee program. The Debt Guarantee Program also allowed
for financial institutions to opt out from coverage. The Company
elected to participate in the Debt Guarantee Program, but it has
not issued any debt under this program.
Federal Reserve System.
The Bank is subject to
Federal Reserve regulations requiring depository institutions to
maintain non-interest-earning reserves against their transaction
accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking accounts). The
Federal Reserve regulations generally require 3% reserves on the
first $44.4 million of transaction accounts and 10% on the
remainder. The first $10.3 million of otherwise reservable
balances (subject to adjustments by the Federal Reserve) are
exempted from the reserve requirements. The Bank is in
compliance with the foregoing requirements.
Community Reinvestment.
Under the Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA), a financial institution has
a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with the
safe and sound operation of such institution, to help meet the
credit needs of its entire community, including low- and
moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish
specific lending requirements or programs for financial
institutions, nor does it limit an institutions discretion
to develop the types of products and services that it believes
are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the
CRA. However, institutions are rated on their performance in
meeting the needs of their communities. Performance is judged in
three areas: (a) a lending test, to evaluate the
institutions record of making loans in its assessment
areas; (b) an investment test, to evaluate the
institutions record of investing in community development
projects, affordable housing and programs
159
benefiting low- or moderate-income individuals and businesses;
and (c) a service test to evaluate the institutions
delivery of services through its branches, ATMs and other
offices. The CRA requires each federal banking agency, in
connection with its examination of a financial institution, to
assess and assign one of four ratings to the institutions
record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take
such record into account in its evaluation of certain
applications by the institution, including applications for
charters, branches and other deposit facilities, relocations,
mergers, consolidations, acquisitions of assets or assumptions
of liabilities and savings and loan holding company
acquisitions. The CRA also requires that all institutions make
public disclosure of their CRA ratings. The Bank received a
satisfactory rating on its most recent CRA
performance evaluation.
Brokered Deposits.
Well-capitalized
institutions are not subject to limitations on brokered
deposits, while an adequately capitalized institution is able to
accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits only with a waiver
from the FDIC and subject to certain restrictions on the yield
paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions are
generally not permitted to accept brokered deposits.
Enforcement Actions.
Federal and state
statutes and regulations provide financial institution
regulatory agencies with great flexibility to undertake
enforcement action against an institution that fails to comply
with regulatory requirements, particularly capital requirements.
Possible enforcement actions range from the imposition of a
capital plan and capital directive to civil money penalties,
cease and desist orders, receivership, conservatorship or the
termination of deposit insurance.
Bank Secrecy Act and USA Patriot Act.
In 1970,
Congress enacted the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting
Act, commonly known as the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).
The BSA requires financial institutions to maintain records of
certain customers and currency transactions and to report
certain domestic and foreign currency transactions, which may
have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax or regulatory
investigations or proceedings. Under this law, financial
institutions are required to develop a BSA compliance program.
In 2001, the President signed into law comprehensive
anti-terrorism legislation commonly known as the USA Patriot
Act. The USA Patriot Act requires financial institutions to
assist in detecting and preventing international money
laundering and the financing of terrorism.
The U.S. Treasury has adopted additional rules and
regulations in order to implement the USA Patriot Act. Under
these regulations, law enforcement officials communicate names
of suspected terrorists and money launderers to financial
institutions so as to enable financial institutions to promptly
locate accounts and transactions involving those suspects.
Financial institutions receiving names of suspects must search
their account and transaction records for potential matches and
report positive results to the U.S. Treasurys
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). Each
financial institution must designate a point of contact to
receive information requests. These regulations outline how
financial institutions can share information concerning
suspected terrorist and money laundering activity with other
financial institutions under the protection of a statutory safe
harbor if each financial institution notifies FinCEN of its
intent to share information.
The U.S. Treasury has also adopted regulations intended to
prevent money laundering and terrorist financing through
correspondent accounts maintained by U.S. financial
institutions on behalf of foreign banks. Financial institutions
are required to take reasonable steps to ensure that they are
not providing banking services directly or indirectly to foreign
shell banks. In addition, banks must have procedures in place to
verify the identity of the persons with whom they deal, and
financial institutions must undertake additional due diligence
when circumstances warrant and in the case of money service
businesses.
Interstate Banking and Branching
Legislation.
Under the Interstate Banking and
Efficiency Act of 1994 (the Interstate Banking Act),
bank holding companies are allowed to acquire banks across state
lines subject to various requirements of the Federal Reserve. In
addition, under the Interstate Banking Act, banks are permitted,
under some circumstances, to merge with one another across state
lines and thereby create a main bank with branches in separate
states. After establishing branches in a state through an
interstate merger transaction, a bank may establish and acquire
additional branches at any location in the state where any bank
involved in the interstate merger could have established or
acquired branches under applicable federal and state law.
160
The State of Illinois has adopted legislation opting
in to interstate bank mergers, and allows
out-of-state
banks to enter the Illinois market through de novo branching or
through branch-only acquisitions if Illinois state banks are
afforded reciprocal treatment in the other state. It is
anticipated that this interstate merger and branching ability
will increase competition and further consolidate the financial
institutions industry.
Insurance Powers.
Under state law, a state
bank is authorized to act as agent for any fire, life or other
insurance company authorized to do business in the State of
Illinois. Similarly, the Illinois Insurance Code was amended to
allow a state bank to form a subsidiary for the purpose of
becoming a firm registered to sell insurance.
Such sales of insurance by a state bank may only take place
through individuals who have been issued and maintain an
insurance producers license pursuant to the Illinois
Insurance Code.
State banks are prohibited from assuming or guaranteeing any
premium on an insurance policy issued through the bank.
Moreover, state law expressly prohibits tying the provision of
any insurance product to the making of any loan or extension of
credit and requires state banks to make disclosures of this fact
in some instances. Other consumer oriented safeguards are also
required.
Insurance products are sold through Midwest Financial, a
subsidiary of the Bank acquired in 2006 through the acquisition
of Royal American Corporation. Midwest Financial is registered
with, and subject to examination by, the Illinois Department of
Insurance.
Securities Brokerage.
Midwest Financial, a
registered bank-affiliated securities broker-dealer and
registered investment advisor, operates a general securities
business as an introducing broker-dealer. It is registered with
the SEC as a broker-dealer and is a member of FINRA.
Consumer Compliance.
The Bank has been
examined for consumer compliance on a regular basis. The Bank is
subject to many federal consumer protection statutes and
regulations including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair
Housing Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act,
the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act. Among other things, these acts:
|
|
|
|
|
require lenders to disclose credit terms in meaningful and
consistent ways;
|
|
|
|
prohibit discrimination against an applicant in any consumer or
business credit transaction;
|
|
|
|
prohibit discrimination in housing-related lending activities;
|
|
|
|
require certain lenders to collect and report applicant and
borrower data regarding loans for home purchases or improvement
projects;
|
|
|
|
require lenders to provide borrowers with information regarding
the nature and cost of real estate settlements;
|
|
|
|
prohibit certain lending practices and limit escrow account
amounts with respect to real estate transactions; and
|
|
|
|
prescribe possible penalties for violations of the requirements
of consumer protection statutes and regulations.
|
Federal Fair Lending Laws.
The federal fair
lending laws prohibit discriminatory lending practices. The
Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits discrimination against an
applicant in any credit transaction, whether for consumer or
business purposes, on the basis of race, color, religion,
national origin, sex, marital status, age (except in limited
circumstances), receipt of income from public assistance
programs or good-faith exercise of any rights under the Consumer
Credit Protection Act. Under the Fair Housing Act, it is
unlawful for any lender to discriminate in its housing-related
lending activities against any person because of race, color,
religion, national origin, sex, handicap or familial status.
Among other things, these laws prohibit a lender from denying or
discouraging credit on a discriminatory basis, making
excessively low appraisals of property based on racial
considerations, or charging excessive rates or imposing more
stringent loan terms or conditions on a discriminatory basis. In
addition to private actions by aggrieved borrowers or applicants
for actual and punitive damages, the U.S. Department of
Justice and other regulatory agencies can take enforcement
action seeking injunctive and other equitable relief for alleged
violations.
161
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act.
The Federal Home
Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) grew out of public
concern over credit shortages in certain urban neighborhoods.
One purpose of HMDA is to provide public information that will
help show whether financial institutions are serving the housing
credit needs of the neighborhoods and communities in which they
are located. HMDA also includes a fair lending
aspect that requires the collection and disclosure of data about
applicant and borrower characteristics as a way of identifying
possible discriminatory lending patterns and enforcing
anti-discrimination statutes. HMDA requires institutions to
report data regarding applications for loans for the purchase or
improvement of
one-to-four
family and multi-family dwellings, as well as information
concerning originations and purchases of such loans. Federal
bank regulators rely, in part, upon data provided under HMDA to
determine whether depository institutions engage in
discriminatory lending practices.
The appropriate federal banking agency, or, in some cases,
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, enforces
compliance with HMDA and implements its regulations.
Administrative sanctions, including civil money penalties, may
be imposed by supervisory agencies for violations of this act.
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act.
The
Federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
(RESPA) requires lenders to provide borrowers with
disclosures regarding the nature and cost of real estate
settlements. RESPA also prohibits certain abusive practices,
such as kickbacks, and places limitations on the amount of
escrow accounts. Violations of RESPA may result in imposition of
penalties, including: (1) civil liability equal to three
times the amount of any charge paid for the settlement services
or civil liability of up to $1,000 per claimant, depending on
the violation; (2) awards of court costs and
attorneys fees; and (3) fines of not more than
$10,000 or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.
Truth in Lending Act.
The federal Truth in
Lending Act is designed to ensure that credit terms are
disclosed in a meaningful way so that consumers may compare
credit terms more readily and knowledgeably. As result of the
act, all creditors must use the same credit terminology and
expressions of rates, and disclose the annual percentage rate,
the finance charge, the amount financed, the total of payments
and the payment schedule for each proposed loan.
On July 14, 2008, the Federal Reserve Board approved a
final rule, which will become effective on July 1, 2009,
amending Regulation Z (Truth in Lending) to prohibit
unfair, abusive or deceptive home mortgage lending practices and
restricts certain other mortgage practices. The final rule also
establishes advertising standards and requires certain mortgage
disclosures to be given to consumers earlier in the transaction.
The final rule adds four new protections for a newly defined
category of higher-priced mortgage loans secured by
a consumers principal dwelling. For loans in this
category, these protections will: (1) prohibit a lender
from making a loan without regard to borrowers ability to
repay the loan from income and assets other than the homes
value; (2) require creditors to verify the income and
assets they rely upon to determine repayment ability;
(3) ban any prepayment penalty if the payment can change in
the initial four years (and for certain other higher-priced
loans, the prepayment penalty period cannot last for more than
two years); and (4) require creditors to establish escrow
accounts for property taxes and homeowners insurance for
all first-lien mortgage loans.
In addition to the rules governing higher-priced loans, the
rules adopted new protections for loans secured by a
consumers principal dwelling, regardless of whether the
loan is considered to be a higher-priced mortgage
loan. Under the new rules: (1) creditors and mortgage
brokers are prohibited from coercing a real estate appraiser to
misstate a homes value; (2) companies that service
mortgage loans are prohibited from engaging in certain
practices, such as pyramiding late fees; (3) servicers are
required to credit consumers loan payments as of the date
of receipt and provide a payoff statement within a reasonable
time of request; (4) creditors must provide a good-faith
estimate of the loan costs, including a schedule of payments,
within three days after a consumer applies for any mortgage loan
secured by a consumers principal dwelling, such as a home
improvement loan or a loan to refinance an existing loan; and
(5) consumers cannot be charged any fee until after they
receive the early disclosures, except a reasonable fee for
obtaining the consumers credit history.
For all mortgages, the new rules also set additional advertising
standards. Advertising rules now require additional information
about rates, monthly payments, and other loan features. The
final rule bans seven
162
deceptive or misleading advertising practices, including
representing that a rate or payment is fixed when it
can change.
Violations of the Truth in Lending Act may result in regulatory
sanctions and in the imposition of both civil and, in the case
of willful violations, criminal penalties. Under certain
circumstances, the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z of
the Federal Reserve Act also provide a consumer with a right of
rescission, which if exercised would require the creditor to
reimburse any amount paid by the consumer to the creditor or to
a third party in connection with the offending transaction,
including finance charges, application fees, commitment fees,
title search fees and appraisal fees. Consumers may also seek
actual and punitive damages for violations of the Truth in
Lending Act.
Fair Credit Reporting Act.
In connection with
the passage of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions (FACT)
Act, the Banks federal regulator issued final rules and
guidelines, effective November 1, 2008, requiring the Bank
to adopt and implement a written identity theft prevention
program, paying particular attention to 26 identified
red flag events. The program must also assess the
validity of address change requests for card issuers and for
users of consumer reports to verify the subject of a consumer
report in the event of notice of an address discrepancy.
The FACT Act also gives consumers the ability to challenge the
Bank with respect to credit reporting information provided by
the Bank. The new rule also prohibits the Bank from using
certain information it may acquire from an affiliate to solicit
the consumer for marketing purposes unless the consumer has been
give notice and an opportunity to opt out of such solicitation
for a period of five years.
Federal Home Loan Bank System.
The Bank is a
member of the Federal Home Loan Bank system, which consists of
12 regional FHLBs. The FHLB system provides a central credit
facility primarily for member institutions. The Bank, as a
member of the FHLB of Chicago (FHLBC), is required
to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in FHLBC in an
amount at least equal to 1% of the aggregate principal amount of
its unpaid residential mortgage loans and similar obligations at
the beginning of each year, or 1/20 of its advances (borrowings)
from the FHLBC, whichever is greater. At September 30,
2009, the Bank had advances from the FHLBC with aggregate
outstanding principal balances of $340 million, and the
Banks investment in the FHLBC stock of $17.0 million
was at its minimum requirement. FHLB advances must be secured by
specified types of collateral and are available to member
institutions primarily for funding purposes.
Regulatory directives, capital requirements and net income of
the FHLBs affect their ability to pay dividends to the Bank. In
addition, FHLBs are required to provide funds to cover certain
obligations and to fund the resolution of insolvent thrifts and
to contribute funds for affordable housing programs. These
requirements could reduce the amount of dividends that the FHLBs
pay to their members and could also result in the FHLBs imposing
a higher rate of interest on advances to their members.
In October 2007, the FHLBC announced that it entered into a
consensual cease and desist order with its regulator which
prohibits it from redeeming or repurchasing any capital stock
from members or declaring dividends on its capital stock without
prior approval. The FHLBC announced in October 2007 that it
would suspend dividends on its stock and no dividends have been
declared or paid since that time. In July 2008, the FHLBC
announced that it had received regulatory approval to make
limited redemptions of its capital stock. The redemptions are
limited to capital stock purchased in connection with member
borrowing advances which will be redeemed when the advances are
paid.
Monetary
Policy and Economic Conditions
The earnings of banks and bank holding companies are affected by
general economic conditions and by the fiscal and monetary
policies of federal regulatory agencies, including the Federal
Reserve. Through open market transactions, variations in the
discount rate and the establishment of reserve requirements, the
Federal Reserve exerts considerable influence over the cost and
availability of funds obtainable for lending or investing.
The above monetary and fiscal policies and resulting changes in
interest rates have affected the operating results of all
commercial banks in the past and are expected to do so in the
future. Banks and their respective holding company cannot fully
predict the nature or the extent of any effects which fiscal or
monetary policies may have on their business and earnings.
163
MANAGEMENT
Executive
Officers and Directors
Listed below are the executive officers and directors of the
Company as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s) Held
|
|
Percy L. Berger
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of the Company and the Bank
|
Roberto R. Herencia
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the
Bank, Director of the Company and the Bank
|
Barry I. Forrester
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Director of the Company and the Bank
|
Robert J. Genetski
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Director of the Company and the Bank
|
Gerald F. Hartley
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
Director of the Company and the Bank
|
E. V. Silveri
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
Director of the Company and the Bank
|
Monsignor Kenneth Velo
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Director of the Company and the Bank
|
J. J. Fritz
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Senior Executive Vice President of the Company
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and CFO of the Company and the Bank
|
Mary C. Ceas
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Human Resources
|
Jan R. Thiry
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of the Bank
|
Thomas J. Bell, III
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of the
Company
|
Thomas A. Caravello
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of the Bank
|
Bruno P. Costa
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operations and Technology
Officer of the Bank
|
Jonathan P. Gilfillan
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Division Head of Commercial Real
Estate Lending of the Bank
|
Thomas H. Hackett
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of the Bank
|
Stephan L. Markovits
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of the Bank
|
Dennis M. Motyka
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of the Bank
|
David Taylor
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of the Bank
|
Percy L. Berger, CPA
, was elected chairman of the board
of the Company and the Bank effective December 31, 2008 and
has served as a director of the Company and the Bank since May
2008. Mr. Berger is the founder and managing partner of
Dempster Group, a middle-market private equity investment firm.
He is chairman of the board and chief executive officer of NEATT
Wireless, LLC, a regional wireless telecommunications company.
Mr. Berger founded Green Leaf Ridge Company, a private
equity investment firm in 1998. Mr. Berger is a former vice
chairman and director of Dynix.com. He also served as a director
of PrimeCo Wireless Communication, LLC and Chicagos
Lincoln Park Zoo. He is currently a director of NorthShore
University Health System. Mr. Berger was managing director,
senior vice president and senior client manager at Bank of
America, and its predecessor bank, NationsBanc, NA in the
midwest. During his career, Mr. Berger served in
progressively increasing capacities as a corporate banker in
Continental Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, and Chemical Bank (now
JPMorgan Chase). Mr. Berger is a member of the Illinois
Society of Certified Public Accountants and The American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Roberto R. Herencia
assumed the roles of President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank, and was
appointed to the board of directors of the Company on
May 15, 2009. He was formerly president and director of
Banco Popular North America based in Chicago and executive vice
president of Popular, Inc., the parent company.
Mr. Herencia spent 17 years at Banco Popular. In
addition to serving as executive vice president of Popular, Inc.
since 1997, and president and director of Banco Popular
North America since December 2001, he
164
served as chief operating officer, senior credit officer and
reported to Populars CFO in charge of capital markets,
M&A and rating agencies between 1991 and 2001. Prior to
joining Popular, Mr. Herencia spent 10 years in a
variety of senior positions at The First National Bank of
Chicago, including serving as head of the emerging markets
division and operations in Latin America. He was directly
involved in the restructure, workout and debt for equity swaps
of public and private sector credits in Latin America.
Barry I. Forrester, CFA
, has served as a director of the
Company since May 2005 and as a director of the Bank since June
2005. He has been a private investor since 2004. Previously, he
had worked over 14 years as an investment banker
specializing in providing corporate finance services to
financial institutions including public offerings of equity and
debt, mergers and acquisitions, and
mutual-to-stock
conversion transactions. He served clients through positions at
William Blair & Company from 2000 through 2004, ABN
AMRO Incorporated from 1997 to 2000, and EVEREN Securities, Inc.
(including predecessors Kemper Securities and Blunt
Ellis & Loewi) from 1989 to 1997. Prior thereto he was
a financial analyst with Crowe Chizek and Company, LLP. He was a
director of Eagle Savings Bank from January 2006 to June 2007.
He holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and is a
member of the CFA Institute and CFA Society of Chicago.
Robert J. Genetski, PhD
, has served as director of the
Company since June 2005. He has also served as a director of the
Bank since 2004. He has been president of Robert
Genetski & Associates, Inc. since 1991. He also serves
as a director of DNP Select Income Fund. He has previously
taught at the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business,
New York University, and Wheaton College.
Gerald F. Hartley, CPA
, has served as a director of the
Company and chairman of the audit committee since June 2003.
Mr. Hartley was named director of the Bank in February
2004. Mr. Hartley has over 40 years experience in
financial, accounting, and auditing responsibilities. He served
as a director of Republic Bank of Chicago and Republic Bancorp
Co. from August 2000 through May 2003. Previously, he spent
35 years in the public accounting profession, primarily
with Crowe Chizek and Company, LLP, dealing with community-based
banks and bank holding companies. Mr. Hartley served as a
member of the AICPA Committee on Bank Accounting and Auditing
and as a director of the Illinois CPA Society.
E. V. Silveri
served as chairman of the board of the
Company from 1983 until December 31, 2007. Mr. Silveri
was elected a director of the Bank in 1972 and served as
chairman of the board of the Bank from 1975 until
December 31, 2007. He was also a member of the board of
directors of Midwest Bank of Hinsdale, and served as chairman of
First Midwest Data Corp from 1991 to 2002. Since 1984,
Mr. Silveri has been the president and also a director of
Go-Tane Service Stations, Inc., a firm he co-founded in 1966.
Monsignor Kenneth Velo
has served as a director of the
Company since June 2005. He has served as a director of the Bank
since 2004. He has been a priest in the Archdiocese of Chicago
since 1973 and named Monsignor in 1996. He has been the head of
the Office of Catholic Collaboration of DePaul University
serving in the capacity of senior executive since 2001. He has
also been president of The Big Shoulders Fund since 2003.
Monsignor Velo was president of Catholic Extension, a national
organization funding more than 75 dioceses in the United
States of America. He is a member of the board of
Childrens Memorial Hospital and serves on the board of
Trustees of Fenwick College Preparatory School as well as other
civic and community efforts.
J. J. Fritz
previously served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and Chief Executive Officer of
the Bank since January 29, 2009. He was named Director and
Executive Vice President of the Company and Director, President,
and Chief Operating Officer of the Bank in July 2006.
Mr. Fritz was also named director, president, and chief
executive officer of Midwest Financial in July 2006.
Mr. Fritz and other investors founded Royal American in
1991, where he served as chairman and chief executive officer,
after he served as chief executive officer of First Chicago Bank
of Mt. Prospect. His lengthy career in the Chicago metropolitan
area also includes positions at Northern Trust, First National
Bank of Libertyville and Continental Illinois National Bank.
JoAnn S. Lilek
was named Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank in March
2008. Ms. Lilek was Chief Financial Officer for DSC
Logistics, a Chicago-based national supply chain management
firm. Before joining DSC, Lilek had a 23 year career at
ABNAmro North American
165
Inc. where her positions included Executive Vice President
reporting directly to the Chairman, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer Wholesale Banking North America and
Group Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller.
Mary C. Ceas, SPHR
, was named Senior Vice
President Human Resources of the Company in 2000.
Previously, Ms. Ceas was Vice President Human
Resources since 1997 and served as Director Training
and Development from 1995 to 1997.
Jan R. Thiry, CPA
was named Chief Accounting Officer of
the Company effective March 15, 2007. Mr. Thiry was
also named director of Midwest Financial in June 2007 and
director and secretary of MBTC Investment Company in March 2008.
Mr. Thiry was hired in December 2006 as Senior Vice
President and Controller of the Company and the Bank. He served
as senior vice president and controller of CIB Marine
Bancshares in Pewaukee, Wisconsin from 1999 to 2006.
Mr. Thiry has also held senior positions at M&I
Corporation and Security Bank in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Additionally, he was a senior auditor at KPMG LLP.
Mr. Thiry is a member of the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants and the Financial Managers Society.
Sheldon Bernstein
was named Executive Vice President of
the Bank in January 2005. He previously served as Senior Vice
President of the Company from 2001 to 2005. Mr. Bernstein
has served as President of the Bank, Cook County Region from
2000 to 2004. From 2000 through 2002, he served as Chief
Operating Officer of the Bank. Previously, Mr. Bernstein
served as Executive Vice President-Lending of the Bank since
1993. He was also served as director of Midwest Financial and
Investment Services, Inc. from 2002 to 2005. Mr. Bernstein
was a director of First Midwest Data Corp from 2001 to 2002.
Thomas J. Bell, III
was named Executive Vice
President and Chief Investment Officer of the Company in
December 2008. Mr. Bell previously served as Senior Vice
President for ABN AMRO North America Inc., a Chicago-based bank
holding company for the LaSalle Banks. In his fourteen years of
service at ABN AMRO, Mr. Bell contributed to multiple
disciplines within the asset and liability management, capital
markets and treasury functions. Prior to ABN AMRO/LaSalle,
Mr. Bell spent several years with the Federal Reserve Bank
of Chicago.
Thomas A. Caravello
was named Executive Vice President
and Chief Credit Officer of the Bank in January 2005.
Mr. Caravello was named manager, president, and chief
executive officer of Midwest Funding, L.L.C. in May 2006. He has
served as Senior Vice President Credit
Administration from 2003 to 2005. Previously he served as Vice
President Credit Administration from 1998 to 2003.
Bruno P. Costa
was named Executive Vice President and
Chief Operations and Technology Officer of the Bank in January
2005. He served as President of the Information Services
Division of the Bank from 2002 to 2005. Mr. Costa served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of First Midwest Data
Corp. from 1995 to 2002. He held various management positions at
the Bank since 1983.
Jonathan Gilfillan
was named Executive Vice President and
Division Head of Commercial Real Estate Lending of the Bank
in July 2008. Mr. Gilfillan previously served as Senior
Vice President for Park National Bank since 2007. Prior to
joining Park National, Mr. Gilfillan spent his career at
LaSalle Bank NA, where he had been specializing in CRE lending
since 1992.
Thomas H. Hackett
was named Executive Vice President of
the Bank in November 2003. Mr. Hackett was named manager
and vice president of Midwest Funding, L.L.C. in May 2006. He
previously was division manager at Banc One, Chicago, Illinois
from 2002 to 2003. Prior, he was first vice president of
American National Bank of Chicago from 1997 to 2002. He has also
served in similar capacities at First Chicago/NBD, Park Ridge,
IL, NBD of Woodridge and Heritage Bank of Woodridge, Illinois.
Stephan L. Markovits
was named Executive Vice President
of the Bank in October 2007. Mr. Markovits previously was
president of Northwest Suburban Bancorp, Inc. from 2003 to 2007.
He also held various management positions at Plains Bank of
Illinois from 1998 to 2003.
Dennis M. Motyka
was named Executive Vice President of
the Bank and director of Midwest Financial in October 2005. He
previously was senior vice president and director of banking
centers for Cole Taylor Bank
166
in Rosemont from 2002 to 2005. He served as senior vice
president and Illinois regional manager for LaSalle Bank in
Chicago from 1996 to 2002. He also held positions with Comerica
Bank and Affiliated Bank, both in Franklin Park, as well as with
Western National Bank in Cicero.
David Taylor
was named Executive Vice President of the
Banks wealth management group in August 2008.
Mr. Taylor previously held management positions at Bank of
America US Trust Wealth Management (formerly LaSalle Bank)
for 11 years. Mr. Taylor began his career in 1989 with
Pioneer Bank & Trust Company.
Director
Independence
The board of directors (after receiving a recommendation from
the corporate governance and nominating committee) determined on
February 24, 2009 that Messrs. Berger, Forrester,
Hartley, OHara, Rizza, Rosenquist, Silveri, and
Dr. Genetski and Monsignor Velo are independent
directors as such term is defined in Rule 4200(a)(15)
of the Nasdaq listing standards. A copy of our director
independence standards is available at
www.midwestbanc.com
About Us
Corporate Info Governance.
When making the independence determinations, both the corporate
governance and nominating committee and the board of directors
reviewed the information relating to transactions certain
directors had in the ordinary course of business with the
Company and the Bank (see Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions for a discussion of these
transactions). After considering this information, both the
committee and the board concluded that these transactions would
not interfere with the exercise of independent judgment of these
directors in carrying out their responsibilities as directors of
the Company.
Independent directors may meet in executive session, without
management, at any time, and are regularly scheduled for such
executive sessions four times a year.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Roberto Herencia, president and chief executive officer of the
Company and the Bank, serves on the board of directors of the
Company and the Bank. Each of the directors of the Company is
also a director of the Bank.
Determinations regarding compensation of the employees of
Midwest and the Bank are made by the compensation committee of
the board of directors, who are all independent directors.
Additionally, there were no compensation committee interlocks
during 2008, which generally means that no executive officer of
Midwest served as a director or member of the compensation
committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers
served as a director or member of our compensation committee.
167
Directors
Compensation
The following table summarizes the compensation earned by or
paid to non-employee directors in 2008, and the amount recorded
as expense in the Companys 2008 financial statements with
respect to restricted stock awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name(a)(1)
|
|
($)(b)(2)
|
|
|
($(c)(3)(4)
|
|
|
($)(d)
|
|
|
($)(e)
|
|
|
(f)(5)
|
|
|
($)(g)
|
|
|
($)(b)
|
|
|
Percy Berger
|
|
$
|
44,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,643
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,643
|
|
Angelo DiPaolo
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
Barry I. Forrester
|
|
|
82,125
|
|
|
|
8,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,442
|
|
Robert Genetski
|
|
|
75,250
|
|
|
|
9,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,125
|
|
Gerald F. Hartley
|
|
|
87,000
|
|
|
|
8,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,317
|
|
Homer J. Livingston, Jr.
|
|
|
76,000
|
|
|
|
115,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,917
|
|
Dennis M. OHara
|
|
|
70,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,250
|
|
Thomas A. Rosenquist
|
|
|
68,000
|
|
|
|
22,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,510
|
|
Joseph R. Rizza
|
|
|
58,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,500
|
|
E. V. Silveri
|
|
|
66,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,500
|
|
Kenneth J. Velo
|
|
|
64,250
|
|
|
|
9,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,125
|
|
Leon Wolin
|
|
|
28,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,250
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Executive officers who serve as directors (Messrs. Giancola
and Fritz during 2008) do not receive any directors
fees. Mr. Wolin retired as a director on May 7, 2008.
Mr. Livingston resigned as a director effective
December 31, 2008.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Board and committee meeting fees or paid in 2008 totaled
$777,125, which includes fees paid for service on the boards and
committees of the Company and the Bank. Each director serves as
a director of the Bank. Each director receives a $15,000
retainer from each of the Company and the Bank and $1,000 for
each board meeting attended. Committee members receive the
following fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$750 per meeting attended for the audit committee (eleven
meetings in 2008); and
|
|
|
|
$500 per meeting attended for the compensation (seven meetings
in 2008), corporate governance and nominating (six meetings in
2008), strategic planning (six meetings in 2008), asset
liability (ten meetings in 2008), enterprise risk management
(three meetings in 2008) and trust (four meetings in
2008) committees.
|
Committee chairmen receive the following fees for serving as
chairmen:
|
|
|
|
|
audit committee (Hartley) $18,000; and compensation
(Velo); corporate governance and nominating (Livingston in 2008;
Rosenquist in 2009); strategic planning (Forrester); asset
liability (Forrester); trust (Rosenquist); and enterprise risk
management (Genetski) $2,500 each.
|
|
|
|
On December 11, 2007, the board of directors elected
Mr. Livingston, chairman of the board of directors of
Midwest and the Bank, effective January 1, 2008. The
compensation committee of the board of directors of Midwest
granted 15,000 restricted shares of Midwest common stock
effective January 1, 2008 to Mr. Livingston as
permitted under Midwests Stock and Incentive Plan. A total
of 5,000 shares vested on January 1, 2008. The
remaining shares were forfeited because Mr. Livingston
resigned as a director effective December 31, 2008. The
compensation committee of the board of directors granted
Mr. Berger 30,000 restricted shares on January 1,
2009, when he became chairman of the board. These shares will
vest on January 1, 2010 provided he is still serving as
chairman of the board of directors of Midwest on that date and
will vest earlier upon a
change-in-control.
In addition,
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
the board of directors determined that for 2009, Mr. Berger
would receive a quarterly retainer of $24,000 for each quarter
and no other directors fees.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
The amounts in column (c) reflect the dollar amount of
restricted stock awards recognized for financial statement
reporting purposes for the year ended December 31, 2008, in
accordance with the authoritative guidance for stock
compensation (ASC 718) and thus may include amounts from
awards granted in and prior to 2008. Assumptions used in the
calculation of these amounts are included in
Note 20 Stock Compensation and Restricted Stock
Awards to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008, included in our annual report on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on March 11, 2009.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Under our stock and incentive plan, each person elected or
appointed to serve as a non-employee director (except for a
non-employee director who is elected or appointed in connection
with an acquisition by Midwest) receives a restricted stock
award of 3,000 shares of our common stock.
Messrs. Hartley, Livingston, Forrester, Genetski, Velo and
Rosenquist each received a restricted stock award for
3,000 shares of common stock; these shares have vested.
Mr. Berger received a restricted stock award for
3,000 shares of common stock upon his election as a
director. 1,000 shares have vested and 1,000 shares
will vest following the 2009 and 2010 annual meetings, provided
he is still serving as a director following each such meeting.
During the period of restriction, the directors have voting
rights and receive dividends with respect to the shares which
are restricted.
|
|
(5)
|
|
We offer our directors a deferred compensation plan. The plan
permits directors to elect, prior to the year in which the
directors fees will be paid, to defer a specified portion
of the directors fees into a common stock account or a
money market account. Deferred fees will be credited to the
directors common stock account as of the last day of each
calendar quarter based upon the closing price of our common
stock on the last trading day for such quarter. Eligible
directors who do not elect to participate in the plan will
continue to receive cash compensation for attendance at board or
committee meetings for the Company and the Bank. Directors are
not eligible to receive deferred shares or cash until they cease
serving as a director. Amounts deferred are not taxable until
the director receives the cash or stock.
|
Executive
Compensation
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis addresses the following
topics: the members and role of our compensation committee; our
compensation-setting process; our compensation philosophy and
policies regarding executive compensation; our
compensation-setting process; the components of our executive
compensation program; and our compensation decisions for 2008
and for the first quarter of 2009.
Executive
Summary
2008 was the most challenging year that Midwest has ever
faced. Due to the economic crisis in the U.S. and other
factors, Midwest experienced a substantial loss and its stock
price declined precipitously. Midwests financial
performance for 2008 is reflected in the total compensation paid
to executives. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
On January 29, 2009, J. J. Fritz, formerly the chief
operating officer of Midwest, was appointed president and chief
executive officer of Midwest, replacing James J. Giancola.
Mr. Fritz assumed these positions without any salary or
benefit increase.
|
|
|
|
The chief executive officer and all executive vice presidents as
a group (15 people), the executive officer group, did not
receive bonuses (whether in the form of cash, restricted stock
or options) based upon our 2008 performance.
|
|
|
|
The maximum total incentive compensation approved for all
participants in Midwests 2008 management incentive plan
has decreased by 47% from 2007 payouts and was only 43% of the
2008 targeted amount.
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock held by employees, including members
of the executive officer group, has declined in value along with
the decline in Midwests stock price.
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
The 2009 management incentive plan will not provide for any
bonuses to the executive officer group members unless earnings
exceed targeted earnings per share.
|
|
|
|
Even if targeted earnings per share are exceeded, the maximum
bonus pool will only be 75% of the 2007 targeted bonus pool.
|
|
|
|
If targeted earnings per share are not met, executive officer
group members will not participate in the bonus pool and the
payout will not exceed 20% of the 2007 target bonus pool and 20%
of the 2008 target bonus pool.
|
|
|
|
We increased base salaries for the executive officer group, on
average, by 3% for 2009 (except for Mr. Giancola and
Mr. Fritz whose base salaries were not increased),
reflecting both merit and market-based
cost-of-living
adjustments.
|
|
|
|
In order to more closely align the interest of employees with
those of our stockholders, the committee approved a one-time
grant of stock options to employees which will vest in
3 years. Members of the executive officer group did not
receive stock option awards.
|
In addition to the above, on December 5, 2008, Midwest
issued $84.78 million of preferred stock and warrants to
the U.S. Department of the Treasury, under the Capital
Purchase Program, or the CPP, enacted under the Troubled Asset
Relief Program.
|
|
|
|
|
As required by the terms of the CPP, our executive officers
subject to these rules entered into agreements with Midwest that
amended our executive compensation arrangements. These
amendments are described below.
|
|
|
|
The compensation committee met with Midwests senior risk
officers in February 2009 to review Midwests incentive
compensation arrangements and risks. The risk assessment is
described in more detail under Incentive Compensation Plan
CPP Risk Assessment below.
|
Committee
Members and Independence
As of April 2009, the compensation committee consisted of
Monsignor Velo (Chairman), Messrs. Berger, Forrester, Rizza
and Rosenquist. The committee currently consists of
Messrs. Berger, Forrester, Silveri and Velo. The members of
the committee are independent directors as such term
is defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq listing
standards currently in effect. A copy of the committee charter
is available at our website www.midwestbanc.com
About Us Corporate Info Governance.
Committee
Meetings
The committee meets as often as necessary to perform its duties
and responsibilities. It held seven meetings during 2008 and has
held two meetings so far during 2009. Monsignor Velo works with
our chief executive officer and our senior vice
president human resources to establish the meeting
agenda. The committee typically meets with these officers,
outside counsel and, where appropriate, outside advisors. The
committee also meets in executive session without management.
Many of our compensation decisions relating to 2008 performance
were made in the first quarter of 2009. However, our
compensation planning process neither begins nor ends with any
particular committee meeting. Compensation decisions are
designed to promote our fundamental business objectives and
strategy. Business and succession planning, evaluation of
management performance, and consideration of the business
environment are year-round processes.
The committee receives and reviews materials in advance of each
meeting. These materials include information that management
believes will be helpful to the committee as well as materials
that the committee has specifically requested. Depending on the
agenda for the particular meeting, these materials may include:
|
|
|
|
|
calculations and reports on levels of achievement of individual
and corporate performance objectives;
|
|
|
|
reports on our strategic objectives and budgets for future
periods;
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
information on the executive officers stock ownership,
option holdings and restricted stock holdings, vested and
unvested;
|
|
|
|
information regarding equity compensation plan dilution;
|
|
|
|
estimated values of restricted stock awards;
|
|
|
|
tally sheets setting forth the total compensation of the named
executive officers, including base salary, cash incentives,
equity awards, perquisites and other compensation and any
amounts payable to the executives upon voluntary or involuntary
termination, early or normal retirement, under the supplemental
executive retirement plan or following a
change-in-control
of Midwest;
|
|
|
|
information regarding compensation programs and compensation
levels at study groups of companies identified by our
compensation consultant and reviewed and approved by the
committee; and
|
|
|
|
reports on our performance relative to peer companies.
|
Philosophy
and Policies
We believe that the skills, abilities and commitment of our
senior executives are essential to our long-term success and
competitiveness. The primary goal of our compensation program is
to attract, retain and motivate talented individuals who can
assist us in delivering high performance to our stockholders and
customers. This philosophy is intended to align the interests of
management with those of our stockholders.
A variety of compensation elements is used to attract, retain
and motivate talented individuals who can assist us in
delivering high performance to our stockholders and customers.
These include:
|
|
|
|
|
base salary,
|
|
|
|
annual incentives,
|
|
|
|
performance-accelerated restricted stock awards,
|
|
|
|
employment and
change-in-control
agreements,
|
|
|
|
retirement plans and supplemental executive retirement
plans, and
|
|
|
|
welfare benefits.
|
The allocation of each component varies by executive and is set
to balance appropriately for each executive at-risk pay and
fixed compensation. We have developed a compensation philosophy
of providing market competitive salaries and incentive awards
that, when combined with base salaries, rewards performance that
exceeds objectives with above-market total compensation,
performance below objectives with below-market total
compensation, and performance that meets objectives with
at-market total compensation. We accomplish this through annual
and long-term incentive awards and provide that the awards vary
significantly with performance.
At the core of our compensation philosophy is our guiding belief
that pay should be directly linked to performance. This
philosophy has guided many compensation related decisions:
|
|
|
|
|
A substantial portion of executive officer compensation (33% at
target to 44% at maximum in 2008) was contingent on, and
variable with, achievement of objective corporate
and/or
individual performance objectives. No executive officer group
member received incentive compensation awards for 2008.
|
|
|
|
We provide performance-accelerated equity awards to improve the
relationship between long-term compensation and performance and
to align more closely management and stockholders interests.
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
We offer employment agreements and transitional employment
agreements to our senior officers which are designed to:
|
|
|
|
mitigate the concerns of
change-in-control
transactions on key officers allowing them to focus on the
business,
|
|
|
|
discourage the adoption of policies that may serve to entrench
management over the long-term interests of the
stockholders, and
|
|
|
|
protect our business with non-competition or non-solicitation
provisions.
|
|
|
|
We offer a supplemental executive retirement plan for the
purpose of providing retirement benefits to certain of our
senior officers in order to promote a balance between the
executives retirement compensation and short-term cash
compensation encouraging executive retention and long-term
careers with our company.
|
We also believe that total compensation and accountability
should generally increase with position and responsibility.
Consistent with this philosophy:
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation is higher for individuals with greater
responsibility and greater ability to influence our achievement
of targeted results and strategic initiatives.
|
|
|
|
As position and responsibility increases, a greater portion of
the executive officers total compensation is
performance-based pay contingent on the achievement of
performance objectives.
|
|
|
|
Equity-based compensation is higher for persons with higher
levels of responsibility, making a significant portion of their
total compensation dependent on long-term stock appreciation.
|
Program
Design
We have developed a compensation program which is comprised of
components typically offered to executives by financial
institutions similar to us. The committee recognizes that
attracting and retaining key executives is critical to our long
term success. The committee has set certain guidelines regarding
the compensation of our executive officers. Each executive
officer is reviewed annually and that officers
compensation is based on the committees assessment of that
individuals contribution to the Company.
Compensation
Decisions Should Promote the Interests of
Stockholders
We believe that compensation should focus management on
achieving strong short-term (annual) performance in a manner
that supports and ensures our long-term success and
profitability. The cash incentive portion of our incentive
program is designed to encourage executives to meet annual
performance targets while the restricted stock award portion of
the incentive program encourages the achievement of objectives
on a one year performance cycle, with vesting in three years if
the objectives are not met. We believe that restricted stock
awards create long-term incentives that align the interest of
management with the long-term interests of stockholders.
Compensation
Disclosures Should be Clear and Complete
We have decided that all aspects of executive compensation
should be clearly and comprehensibly disclosed in plain English.
We believe that compensation disclosures should provide all of
the information necessary to permit stockholders to understand
our compensation philosophy, our compensation-setting process
and how much our executives are paid.
Managements
Role in the Compensation-Setting Process
Management plays a significant role in the compensation-setting
process. The most significant aspects of managements role
are suggesting business performance targets and objectives;
formulating individual performance objectives; evaluating
employee performance; and recommending salary levels, cash
incentives and restricted stock awards. The senior vice
president human resources and chief executive
officer work with
172
Monsignor Velo in establishing the agenda for committee
meetings. Management also prepares meeting information for each
committee meeting.
The chief executive officer and the senior vice
president human resources participate in committee
meetings at the committees request to provide background
information regarding our strategic objectives; the chief
executive officers evaluation of the performance of the
senior officers; and compensation recommendations as to the
senior officers (other than himself). The chief executive
officer does not participate in those portions of the committee
meetings where his compensation is reviewed and approved.
Committee
Advisors
The committee charter grants the committee the sole and direct
authority to hire and terminate its advisors and compensation
consultants and approve their compensation. These advisors
report directly to the committee. Midwest pays the
committees advisors and consultants. The committee uses
the services of a compensation consultant to identify specific
study groups of companies and to provide research regarding
compensation programs, compensation levels and performance among
the companies in the study groups (see discussion below at
Benchmarking ).
The committee engaged The Delves Group to serve as a consultant
for 2008 and 2009. The Delves Group has provided consulting
services to the committee since 2005. The committee has
determined that The Delves Group is independent because it has
not performed any other work for Midwest other than providing
advice to the committee and has no prior relationship with
management. The Delves Group reports directly to the committee
but is authorized to communicate with the senior vice
president human resources to obtain information. The
Delves Group will not do any work for Midwest except as
authorized by the committee.
During 2008, The Delves Group was engaged to evaluate the
effectiveness and structure of our executive compensation
programs and practices. This included a market review of
competitive compensation levels as well as a review of our
annual incentive plan. The committee directed the consultant to
design study groups of companies and to provide a research
report regarding compensation levels and compensation programs
at those companies. The consultant in its report indicated that
our base salaries and cash incentive targets were below market.
In response thereto, the committee recommended and the board
approved adjustments to the base salary levels for our key
employees during 2008 and adjusted the payout percentages for
cash incentives for the 2009 management incentive plan.
Participation
in Capital Purchase Program
On December 5, 2008, Midwest completed the sale to the
U.S. Treasury of $84.78 million of newly issued
non-voting cumulative perpetual preferred shares as part of the
Treasurys Capital Purchase Program, CPP. To finalize
Midwests participation in the CPP, Midwest and the
U.S. Treasury entered into a Letter Agreement, including
the Securities Purchase Agreement Standard Terms.
Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, Midwest sold to
the U.S. Treasury the preferred shares and a warrant to
purchase 4,282,020 common shares of the Company, at an exercise
price of $2.97 per share (subject to certain anti-dilution and
other adjustments).
In the Securities Purchase Agreement, Midwest agreed that, until
such time as the U.S. Treasury ceases to own any preferred
shares or the warrant, Midwest will (i) take all necessary
action to ensure that its benefit plans with respect to its
senior executive officers (as defined in the Securities Purchase
Agreement) comply with Section 111(b) of Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008, or EESA, as implemented by the
U.S. Treasury regulations issued under Section 111(b)
of EESA and in effect as of December 5, 2008 (the date of
the sale of the preferred shares and the warrant to the
Treasury), or the CPP executive compensation rules, and
(ii) not adopt any benefit plans with respect to, or which
cover, the Companys senior executive officers that do not
comply with EESA.
On December 5, 2008, the Midwest senior executive officers
subject to the CPP executive compensation rules were: James
Giancola, J.J. Fritz, JoAnn Lilek, Brogan Ptacin and Kelly
OKeeffe. Prior to December 5, 2008, as required by
the Securities Purchase Agreement, the senior executive officers
amended their
173
compensation arrangements with Midwest to ensure that these
arrangements complied with the CPP executive compensation rules.
In these amendments, each officer:
|
|
|
|
|
agreed that he or she would not be able to receive a golden
parachute payment (any payment to a senior executive officer
upon his involuntary termination of employment or in connection
with any bankruptcy filing, insolvency or receivership of
Midwest that equals or exceeds three times his or her average
annual salary for the five-year period preceding the
officers severance from employment) during the period that
the U.S. Treasury holds any debt or equity position in
Midwest acquired pursuant to the CPP;
|
|
|
|
agreed that all bonus and incentive compensation paid while the
U.S. Treasury owns any debt or equity acquired pursuant to
the CPP is subject to recovery by Midwest if such payments are
based on materially inaccurate financial statements or any other
materially inaccurate performance metric; and
|
|
|
|
acknowledged that Midwests compensation committee would be
reviewing the bonus and incentive compensation arrangements
annually to ensure that such arrangements did not encourage the
officer to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten
the value of Midwest.
|
Midwest also agreed that it would limit the annual federal tax
deduction for compensation paid to each senior executive officer
to $500,000.
As of March 26, 2009, Midwests senior executive
officers subject to the CPP executive compensation rules are:
J.J. Fritz, JoAnn Lilek, Brogan Ptacin, Kelly OKeeffe and
Sheldon Bernstein.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, or ARRA,
which was passed by Congress and signed by the President on
February 17, 2009, retroactively amends the
Section 111(b) of EESA and directs the U.S. Treasury
to adopt rules amending its CPP executive compensation rules.
The ARRA executive compensation standards remain in effect
during the period in which any obligation arising from financial
assistance provided under the CPP remains outstanding excluding
any period during which the U.S. Treasury holds only the
Midwest warrant. The ARRA executive compensation standards apply
to Midwests senior executive officers (as defined in the
ARRA), and (in some situations) other employees.
In general, the executive compensation rules applicable to
financial institutions pursuant to EESA, as amended by ARRA, and
the interim final rules promulgated thereunder, include the
following restrictions, requirements and provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
prohibition on executive compensation agreements that encourage
senior executive officers and certain other highly compensated
employees to take unnecessary and excessive risks;
|
|
|
|
recovery of incentive compensation payments paid to senior
executive officers and certain other highly compensated
employees if such payments are subsequently determined to be
based on materially inaccurate financial results;
|
|
|
|
prohibition on making golden parachute payments to senior
executive officers and certain other highly compensated
employees;
|
|
|
|
limitation on the federal tax deduction for compensation paid to
senior executive officers of $500,000.
|
|
|
|
restrictions on paying or accruing any bonus, retention award or
incentive compensation to certain highly compensated employees,
subject to certain exceptions for (i) amounts payable in
long-term restricted stock that does not fully vest until
repayment of TARP assistance or (ii) payments required to
be made pursuant to written employment contracts executed on or
before February 11, 2009;
|
|
|
|
requirement that participating financial institutions establish
an independent compensation committee of its board of directors
to review, discuss and evaluate employee compensation plans;
|
|
|
|
requirement that participating financial institutions create a
company-wide policy regarding excessive or luxury expenditures;
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
requirement that participating financial institutions permit a
separate, nonbinding shareholder vote to approve the
compensation of executive officers;
|
|
|
|
requirement that the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the participating financial institution provide a
written certification of compliance with certain executive
compensation and corporate governance procedures in annual
securities filings; and
|
|
|
|
provision allowing U.S. Treasury to review bonuses,
retention awards and other compensation paid to senior executive
officers before the enactment of ARRA to determine whether any
payments were inconsistent with the executive compensation
restrictions of EESA, as amended, or TARP were otherwise
contrary to the public interest.
|
Midwest has agreed that, until such time as the
U.S. Treasury ceases to own any of the Companys debt
or equity securities, Midwest will take all necessary actions to
ensure that its benefit plans with respect to its senior
executive officers and certain other highly compensated officers
comply with Section 111(b) of EESA as implemented by any
guidance or regulation under EESA.
In light of these new ARRA and EESA requirements governing
executive compensation, the committee has begun a review of
existing policies, programs and arrangements and will implement
additional or take appropriate steps to modify existing
policies, programs and arrangements as necessary to comply with
the new regulations, including with respect to 2009 executive
compensation.
Annual
Evaluation
During the first quarter of 2009, the committee evaluated the
performance of members of the executive officer group
(15 people), in order to determine the cash incentive
compensation and their restricted stock awards for 2008. As
indicated above, the committee determined that no bonuses
(whether in the form of cash, restricted stock or options) would
be paid to members of the executive officer group. Adjustments
to the base salaries of all senior officers for 2009 were
determined in December of 2008. All of these committee actions
were subsequently approved by the board of directors.
Performance
Objectives
In February of 2009, the chief executive officer prepared (at
the committees request) a series of performance goals for
2009 for himself. At its February meeting, the committee
reviewed these performance goals, suggested changes, and
approved the basic format, goals and percentages which have been
approved by the board of directors.
For other members of the executive officer group, the process
begins with establishing individual and corporate performance
objectives during the first quarter of each fiscal year. The
committee engages in an active dialogue with the chief executive
officer concerning strategic objectives and performance targets
and reviews the appropriateness of the financial measures used
in incentive plans and the degree of difficulty in achieving
specific performance targets. The target measures and the amount
of the awards are set on a yearly basis by the committee. The
2009 performance objectives have been finalized.
Benchmarking
We do not believe it is appropriate to establish compensation
levels primarily based on benchmarking. However, it is our
belief that information regarding pay practices at other
companies is useful in two respects. First, we recognize that
our compensation practices must be competitive in the
marketplace especially in light of the competitive nature of the
Chicago market. Second, this marketplace information is one of
the many factors that we consider in assessing the
reasonableness of compensation.
Accordingly, the committee reviews compensation levels for our
named executive officers and other senior officers against
compensation levels at the companies in a study group identified
by our compensation consultant.
175
The compensation consultant provided the committee with
information regarding compensation programs and compensation
levels at the median and 75th percentiles among companies
in this study group described below.
To remain consistent from year to year, the committee currently
intends to use this study group (same industry, high growth and
geographic) as part of the annual marketplace study. The
specific companies included in each group may change based on
their size, relevance or other pertinent factors.
Decisions on compensation levels for members of the executive
group are based on the committees assessment of each
executives contribution to our success as well as median
competitive market compensation levels determined by the
consultant. The review of median competitive data includes both
a
component-by-component
analysis as well as a total compensation review for each of our
executive officers. In determining competitive compensation
levels, we reviewed survey data for similarly sized financial
institutions. Included in the analysis for 2008 awards were data
from the following seven Chicago-market peer community banks:
Amcore Financial, PrivateBancorp, Taylor Capital Group, First
Midwest Bancorp, Inc., Old Second Bancorp, MB Financial, Inc.,
and Wintrust Financial Corporation. The median asset size of the
Chicago-market peer group was $5.2 billion, with an
observed range from $2.5 to $10.0 billion.
Targeted
Compensation Levels
Together with the performance objectives, targeted total
compensation levels are established (i.e., maximum achievable
compensation) for each of our senior officers. In making this
determination, we are guided by the compensation philosophy
described above. We also consider historical compensation
levels, competitive pay practices at the companies in the study
group, and the relative compensation levels among our senior
officers. We may also consider industry conditions, corporate
performance versus a peer group of companies and the overall
effectiveness of our compensation program in achieving desired
performance levels.
Performance
Pay
Under the terms of their employment agreements for 2008,
Mr. Giancola and Mr. Fritz were eligible for
performance based awards with a range from zero to 70% of their
base salaries in cash and the other executive officer group
members were eligible for performance based awards ranging from
zero to 80% of their base salaries in a combination of cash and
stock.
As targeted total compensation levels are determined, we also
determine the portion of total compensation that will be
contingent, performance-based pay. Performance-based pay
generally includes awards made under our incentive plan for
achievement of specified performance objectives. For 2008, no
incentive compensation was paid to the executive officers.
Committee
Effectiveness
The committee reviews, on an annual basis, its performance and
the effectiveness of our compensation program in obtaining
desired results.
Base
Salary
We believe that base salaries are a key element in attracting
and retaining our management team. We, therefore, target base
salaries at the competitive median level for companies of
similar size, performance and industry. In determining
individual salaries, the committee considers in
addition to market median data and study group data
the scope of the executives responsibilities, individual
contributions, experience in the position, our financial
performance, historical compensation and the relative
compensation levels among our executive officers. Salary ranges
and individual salaries for executive officers are reviewed
annually, and adjusted from time to time to take into account
outstanding performance, promotions, and updated competitive
information. While there are no specific performance weightings
established, salary recommendations are based on performance
criteria such as:
|
|
|
|
|
our financial performance with a balance between long- and
short-term growth in earnings, revenue, and asset growth;
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
the executives role in development and implementation of
long-term strategic plans;
|
|
|
|
responsiveness to changes in the financial institution
marketplace; and
|
|
|
|
growth and diversification of the Company.
|
The committee also considers the minimum base salaries set for
the chief executive officer of the Company (Mr. Giancola
during 2008) and chief operating officer of the Bank
(Mr. Fritz during 2008) in their employment agreements.
Set forth below is a table showing the 2009 base salary of each
officer who was a named executive officer as of March 31,
2009 and the increase over 2008.
Base
Salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Base Salary
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
(Increase Over 2008)
|
|
J.J. Fritz
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
$
|
331,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0
|
)
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
|
|
343,200
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
(13,200
|
)
|
Brogan M. Ptacin
|
|
Executive Vice President, the Bank
|
|
|
277,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,680
|
)
|
Kelly OKeeffe
|
|
Executive Vice President, the Bank
|
|
|
243,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,367
|
)
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
Executive Vice President, the Bank
|
|
|
222,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,477
|
)
|
In setting these base salaries, we considered:
|
|
|
|
|
the compensation philosophy and guiding principles described
above;
|
|
|
|
the experience and industry knowledge of the named executive
officers and the quality and effectiveness of their leadership;
|
|
|
|
all of the components of executive compensation, including base
salary, incentive compensation, including restricted stock
awards, retirement and other benefits under the SERP, and other
benefits and perquisites;
|
|
|
|
competitive market pay and performance levels;
|
|
|
|
the mix of performance pay to total compensation;
|
|
|
|
internal pay equity among our senior executives;
|
|
|
|
the base salary paid to the officers in comparable positions at
companies in the study group, using the median as our point of
reference; and
|
|
|
|
the base salary of the chief executive officer of the Company is
subject to conditions in his employment agreement.
|
The committee believes that increases in future total
compensation should be more heavily weighted toward the cash and
stock incentive components rather than salary to promote a pay
for performance compensation framework.
Annual
Management Incentive Compensation Program
Annual incentives are paid to motivate and reward exceptional
performance for the year. Our management incentive compensation
plan provides officers and key employees an opportunity to earn
an annual cash incentive compensation and a stock incentive
compensation for achieving specified, performance-based goals
177
established for the fiscal year. Awards to executive officers
are based upon the committees review and discussion with
our chief executive officer concerning his evaluation of each
executives performance during the year relative to
specific goals developed at the beginning of the year. These
goals are position specific and include a mix of individual,
corporate, and where relevant business
unit measures. These performance objectives allow the named
executive officers and other members of the executive officer
group to earn a cash and stock incentive compensation (50%/50%
mix) up to a specified percentage of their base salary if
the Company or their particular business unit achieves
established goals.
The incentive compensation for each of the executive officer
group members (except the chief executive officer of the Company
and chief operating officer of the Bank during 2008) are
recommended by management, and reviewed, revised as appropriate,
and approved by the committee and then the board of directors.
For 2008, the incentive compensation for our chief executive
officer and the chief executive officer of the Bank were
recommended by the committee and approved by the board of
directors. In reviewing annual incentive awards, the committee
takes into account both competitive median annual incentive
values as well as the impact of annual incentive awards on total
compensation.
Under our management incentive plan, the amount of incentives
(cash and restricted stock) to be awarded for 2008 depended upon
an assessment of Company-wide financial performance, business
unit or department performance, an assessment of the
executives individual contribution to Midwests
performance and a subjective adjustment, if any, by the committee
Messrs. Giancolas and Fritzs incentive awards
were determined based upon their achievement of performance
goals approved by the committee and the board of directors.
Midwest had to meet a minimum earnings per share target of $0.52
for incentives to be paid. Because this target was not met, no
incentive awards were made to Messrs. Giancola and Fritz.
For all other members of the executive officer group, bonuses
were calculated based on Company-wide performance scores (with a
60% weighting assigned to Company-wide performance) and
individual performance which may include business unit or
department performance (with a 40% weighting assigned to
individual performance) and any subjective adjustments.
For example, if an officers target bonus amount was
$150,000, and Company-wide performance was scored at 90% and his
or her individual performance was scored at 95%, the officer
would earn a bonus of $138,000 ($150,000 x ((60% x 90%) + (40% x
95%)), prior to any committee adjustment.
The threshold, target and maximum amounts that could have been
payable to the named executive officers for 2008 are set forth
in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table under Estimated
Possible Payouts under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards.
The lower end of the range reflects the fact that we will not
always achieve all of our performance objectives. The higher end
of the range was established assuming that in some years,
Company-wide and business unit or department performance, as
well as the contributions of individual officers to that
performance, may be extraordinary and exceed our expectations.
No discretionary bonuses were awarded for 2008.
For 2008, the committee introduced into its method for
evaluating Company-wide performance an objective, balanced,
scorecard approach. Under this approach, the committee selected
a balanced set of quantitative measures. Absolute targets were
set based upon Company-wide performance including: earnings per
share, non-performing assets and the growth of core deposits and
loans. Relative targets were set based upon comparing
Midwests performance relative to local peers. The
committee viewed performance in these areas to be most important
to the Companys continued growth and success. Local peer
institutions are: Amcore Financial, Inc., First Midwest Bancorp,
Inc., MB Financial, Inc., Old Second Bancorp, Inc.,
PrivateBancorp, Inc., Taylor Capital, Inc., and Wintrust
Financial Corp.
In order for incentive compensation to be paid for Company-wide
performance, Midwest had to meet a minimum earnings per share
target of $0.52. Because this target was not met, no incentive
awards were made for Company-wide performance.
Taking into account the Companys performance, the
committee did not grant incentive awards to either
Mr. Giancola or Mr. Fritz for 2008. For the other
named executive officers (and the other members of the executive
officer group), the zero Company-wide score meant that they
would not receive an incentive award
178
attributable to Company-wide performance and that the award, if
any, would be entirely dependent on business unit or department
performance and individual performance.
Due to Midwests performance in 2008, the committee
determined that other named executive officers and all of the
other executive officer group members would not receive
incentive awards for 2008.
Incentive awards were made to other employees based upon the
business unit or department performance and individual
performance. This resulted in a 2008 incentive award payout
equal to 47% of the 2007 incentive award payouts and only 43% of
the 2008 targeted payout amount. In addition, the committee
decided to award stock options to certain employees except for
the executive officer group members.
Ms. Lilek received a stock award in 2008 as an inducement
to accept employment with Midwest. Her award is described in the
compensation tables below.
The targeted levels of maximum incentive compensation as a
percentage of base salary for 2008 for the named executive
officers are specified below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
Compensation at
|
|
|
Compensation at
|
|
|
Compensation at
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target Performance
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
Performance Level(3)
|
|
|
Level
|
|
|
Performance Level
|
|
|
J. J. Fritz(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
Joann Sannasardo Lilek(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
Brogan M. Ptacin(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
Kelly OKeeffe(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
Sheldon Bernstein(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
James Giancola(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The incentive compensation ranges for Messrs. Fritz and
Giancola for 2008 were set pursuant to their employment
agreements and range between zero to 70%. They were also
eligible for stock awards as approved by the committee.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The named executive officers are eligible to receive incentive
compensation (50% cash; 50% performance-accelerated restricted
stock) up to the specified percentage of their base salary if
Midwest and/or their business unit, as applicable, achieve
specific performance objectives. If the performance exceeds the
threshold level but is less than the target level, the incentive
compensation is prorated, and if performance exceeds the target
level but is less than the outstanding level, the incentive
compensation is prorated. The incentive compensation for these
individuals is determined partly by reference to the results
achieved by Midwest and partly by the results achieved by the
divisions that they lead. The objectives for individual
divisions are set at different levels.
|
|
(3)
|
|
There is no threshold performance level established in the
incentive plan.
|
On February 23, 2009, the compensation committee approved
the Midwest 2009 management incentive plan, or the 2009 Plan,
and recommended approval to the board of directors of Midwest.
On February 24, 2009, the board of directors of Midwest
approved the 2009 Plan. The 2009 Plan provides employees an
opportunity to earn annual cash incentive compensation for
achieving specified, performance-based goals established for the
fiscal year. These goals are position specific and include a mix
of corporate, individual, and where relevant, business unit
measures. The performance objectives allow the employee to earn
cash incentive compensation up to a specified percentage of his
or her base salary. Two criteria must be met to earn an
incentive payment. First, established corporate goals relating
to earnings per share, core deposit and fee income growth must
be met for the 2009 Plan to fund, and second, the employee must
achieve his or her individual performance goals. Awards to
executive officer group members may be made only if earnings
exceed budgeted earnings per share and other specific goals are
achieved. If earnings exceed budgeted earnings per share and
other specific goals are achieved, executive awards will be
based upon the compensation committees review and
discussion with Midwests chief executive officer
concerning his evaluation of each executives performance
during the year relative to specific goals developed at the
beginning of the year. The
179
primary corporate goals for the Plan in 2009 include earnings
per share, core deposit growth and fee income growth.
The plan applies to various executive officers of Midwest
including: JoAnn Lilek, executive vice president and chief
financial officer of Midwest; Brogan Ptacin
executive vice president of Midwest Bank; Kelly
OKeeffe executive vice president of Midwest
Bank; and Sheldon Bernstein executive vice president
of Midwest Bank.
The incentive award for J.J. Fritz, president and chief
executive officer of Midwest, is governed by his employment
agreement. The employment agreement provides that he will be
eligible for a performance based incentive bonus in accordance
with mutually agreed upon goals and objectives established by
the board of directors. On February 24, 2009, the board of
directors of Midwest, acting on the recommendation of the
compensation committee, approved Mr. Fritzs 2009
performance goals. The amount of the bonus to be awarded to him
will depend upon the extent to which these performance goals are
met. These performance goals will be based primarily on the
achievement of target goals relating to financial and
operational targets, including, among others, earnings per
share, budgeted financial performance, risk management, improved
credit quality, and maintaining good regulatory relations with
sufficient capital to insure safety and soundness while
supporting the longer-term, strategic goals of Midwest. The
compensation committee will determine to what extent the
performance goals have been satisfied. The committee will then
recommend to the board of directors the amount of the bonus to
be paid to Mr. Fritz.
Equity
Based Compensation
We believe that equity compensation is the most effective means
of creating a long-term link between the compensation provided
to officers and other key management personnel with gains
realized by the stockholders. We have elected to use
performance-accelerated restricted stock awards as our equity
compensation vehicle.
In 2005 with the assistance of the consultant, the committee
designed a performance-based, executive long-term incentive
program. Under this program, the committee decided to award a
mix of performance-accelerated options and
performance-accelerated restricted stock. The intention was to
encourage employees to create stockholder value through both the
prospect of higher stock values anticipated from achieving
performance goals and the vesting structure which encourages
employees to achieve the performance goals as soon as possible.
This program was also intended to both ensure a closer alignment
between long-term compensation and performance, and reduce the
dilutive impact to stockholders of service vested equity grants.
During 2006 and 2007, the timing of equity award vesting was
determined by performance on two measures: earnings per share
and return on assets. For 2006 and 2007 performance, the
committee and the board elected to award only performance
accelerated restricted stock. If the performance targets were
met, the awards would vest in three years; if not, the awards
would vest in five years. The performance targets for 2006 and
2007 were not met.
When initially setting incentive awards granted in January 2008
for performance in 2007, the committee determined that the
incentive awards would be made in the form of cash (50%) and
performance-accelerated restricted stock awards (50%). The
committee also determined that the timing of vesting for these
restricted stock awards would be based on one performance
measure: earnings per share for 2008. The awards would vest in
approximately three years if the performance target was met and
in five years if it was not met. The 2008 performance measure
was not met so these awards will vest in 2013.
When setting incentive awards to be granted in 2009 for
performance in 2008, the committee determined that awards would
be made in the form of cash and restricted stock awards. These
restricted stock awards will vest in three years. The committee
also determined that in order to more closely align the interest
of employees with those of our stockholders, the committee
approved a one-time grant of stock options to employees which
will vest in three years.
180
The committee developed guidelines, set forth below, in awarding
equity based compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
To promote closer alignment between long-term compensation and
performance, equity awards will be performance based.
|
|
|
|
The amount of shares available for awards to employees should
equal a target maximum percentage consistent with comparable
group medians (in most situations) and should not exceed
12-13%.
|
|
|
|
Awards in any given year (absent unusual circumstances) should
not exceed 1.5% of the issued and outstanding shares of our
common stock.
|
|
|
|
Outstanding awards of restricted stock (absent unusual
circumstances) should not exceed 5% of the issued and
outstanding shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
|
As part of its philosophy, the committee is opposed to equity
plans that contain evergreen features (automatic yearly
increases of shares covered by the plan) or permit repricing of
previously granted awards.
|
For 2008, no incentive compensation awards (whether in the form
of cash, restricted stock or options) were made to the members
of the executive officer group (15 people).
Variable
Performance-Based Pay as a Percentage of Potential
Compensation
We place great emphasis on variable performance-based
compensation. However, because no incentive awards were made to
executive officers for 2008, none of their 2008 compensation was
variable-performance based.
Severance
Arrangements
None of our named executive officers has any arrangement that
provides for payment of severance payments except as may be
provided in their employment or transitional employment
agreements discussed below, under the captions Employment
Agreements and Transitional Employment
Agreements. We do offer a severance program in which all
eligible employees participate that does not discriminate in
favor of the senior officers, including the named executive
officers. Severance arrangements are subject to the CPP
executive compensation rules described under Participation
in the Capital Purchase Program above.
Employment
Agreements and Transitional Employment Agreements
When reviewing compensation matters and developing compensation
packages for executive officers during 2008, the committee takes
into consideration that the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries have entered into an employment agreements with
Messrs. Giancola and Fritz and transitional employment
agreements with each of the other named executive officers and
certain other officers. For a discussion of these agreements,
Executive Compensation as described under
Participation in Capital Program above,
Employment Agreements and Transitional
Employment Agreements. Under our employment agreements and
our transitional employment agreements with the other named
executive officers, the executive officers are entitled to
receive certain payments upon a
change-in-control.
Our stock plan provides that upon a change in control (as
defined in the plan) all unvested stock options and restricted
stock awards shall immediately become vested. For a discussion
of post-employment termination payments, see Executive
Compensation as described under Participation in
Capital Program above and Potential Payments Upon
Termination of Employment or
Change-in-Control.
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan and Retirement Benefits
The committee also considers that we have implemented a
supplemental executive retirement plan, the SERP, for the
purpose of providing retirement benefits to certain officers of
the Company and its subsidiaries. The annual retirement benefit
available under the SERP is calculated to range from 20% to 35%
of final salary (as defined in the SERP agreement) at normal
retirement age of 65 and is payable over 15 years. For a
further
181
discussion of the SERP, see Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan. The amounts accrued for the benefit of
the named executive officers for 2008 are set out in column
(h) of the Summary Compensation Table.
401(k)
Plan
We offer a 401(k) salary reduction plan to almost all of our
employees under which participants may elect to make tax
deferred contributions. We contribute 1% more than the
employees contribution up to a maximum of 5% (e.g., if the
employee contributes 3% of his salary, we contribute an amount
equal to 4% of the employees salary). The amounts
contributed to the plan for the benefit of the named executive
officers for 2008 are set out in column (i) of the
Summary Compensation Table.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The board of directors, based upon a recommendation from the
compensation committee, approved the Midwest Employee Stock
Purchase Plan in 2008. The plan is offered to employees in order
to encourage and facilitate the purchase of shares of Company
common stock by our employees by offering shares at a discount
to the market price. Employees will be permitted to purchase the
common stock through accumulated payroll deductions. We believe
that the acquisition of shares of our common stock by employees
allows us to offer additional incentives to existing employees
and to attract and retain key personnel.
Additional
Benefits
Executive officers participate in other employee benefit plans
generally available to all employees on the same terms as
similarly situated employees. In addition, certain executive
officers receive certain other additional perquisites that are
described in column (i) of the Summary Compensation Table.
The committee requested that Midwest disclose all perquisites
provided to the executives shown in the table even if the
perquisites fall below the disclosure thresholds under SEC rules.
Incentive
Compensation Plan CPP Risk Assessment
The CPP executive compensation rules require that Midwests
compensation committee, within 90 days following the
December 5, 2008 (the closing of Midwests
participation in the CPP), perform a review of Midwests
incentive compensation programs with Midwests senior risk
officers to ensure that the programs do not encourage the senior
executive officers subject to the CPP executive compensation
rules to take unnecessary or excessive risk that threaten the
value of Midwest.
Midwests only incentive compensation program available to
its executive officer group (15 people in total) is its
management incentive plan. Cash and restricted stock awards have
been made to the plan participants in 2005, 2006 and 2007 based
upon their performance and that of Midwest. In 2008, no awards
were made under the plan to the members of the executive officer
group. The 2009 plan provides that no payments will be made to
the chief executive officer or any other executive officer group
member unless earnings exceed targeted earnings per share. If
earnings exceed targeted earnings per share, incentives will be
paid on a graduated percentage of excess earnings not to exceed
an amount equal to 75% of the management incentive plans
customary target payout level.
The compensation committee met with Midwests senior risk
officers in February 2009 to identify any features of the
Midwests incentive compensation plan that would encourage
the senior executive officers to take unnecessary and excessive
risks that threaten the value of Midwest.
The compensation committee reviewed the incentive compensation
plan design features as part of its assessment. The features
that were reviewed included the mix of salary and
incentive compensation, the incentive compensation performance
measures themselves, the relationship between the performance
measures and the corresponding incentive payouts and the use of
equity in incentive awards.
With respect to the plan, the committee believed that incentive
goals (earnings per share, core deposit growth and fee income
growth) had been set at achievable, yet challenging, levels. The
committee also concluded that the payment of a portion of the
incentives in cash was appropriate and consistent with past
182
practices and market practice. The committee also noted that it
had exercised downward discretion for incentive payments on an
informal basis for 2008 as the committee deemed appropriate
based on the circumstances.
With respect to the features of Midwests long-term
incentive plan, the compensation committee concluded that the
mix of restricted stock unit awards and stock
options was appropriate since there are advantages and
disadvantages to every form of equity award. The committee also
concluded that the earnings target was in the best long-term
interests of stockholders, and that it did not encourage senior
executive officers to take unnecessary or excessive risks
through short-term actions that could influence stock price.
The committee concluded that none of the features of the
management incentive plan encourages executive officers to take
unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten
Midwests value. The committee intends to undertake this
review at least twice a year.
Compensation
Policies
Set forth below is a discussion of other policies that impact
our compensation decisions.
Internal
Pay Equity
We believe that internal equity is an important factor to be
considered in establishing compensation for the officers. We
have not established a policy regarding the ratio of total
compensation of the chief executive officer to that of the other
officers, but we do review compensation levels to ensure that
appropriate equity exists. We intend to continue to review
internal compensation equity and may adopt a formal policy in
the future if we deem such a policy to be appropriate.
The
Tax Deductibility of Compensation Should be Maximized Where
Appropriate
Midwest generally seeks to maximize the deductibility for tax
purposes of all elements of compensation. Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the Code,
generally disallows a tax deduction to public corporations for
non-qualifying compensation in excess of $1.0 million. We
review compensation plans in light of applicable tax provisions,
including Section 162(m) and Section 409A of the Code,
and may revise compensation plans from time to time to maximize
deductibility. However, we may approve compensation that does
not qualify for deductibility when we deem it to be in the best
interests of Midwest.
The committee will continue to evaluate the impact of
Section 162(m) and Section 409A and to consider
compensation policies and programs appropriate for an
organization of the Companys size and history in an effort
to address the potential impact. The committee may determine
that it is appropriate to continue to compensate an executive
above the 162(m) limit for various reasons, including in
circumstances of outstanding corporate or executive achievement.
As a result of our participation in CPP, we agreed to be subject
to amendments to Section 162(m) which limit the
deductibility of all compensation, including performance based
compensation, to $500,000 per executive with respect to any
taxable year during which the U.S. Treasury retains its
investment in Midwest. CPP executive compensation rules provide
for application of the $500,000 limitation on a pro rata basis
with respect to calendar years during which the
U.S. Treasury held its investment for less than the full
year, as was the case in 2008 when the U.S. Treasury held
the investment for less than one month.
When our board of directors determined to participate in CPP, it
was aware of, factored into its analysis and agreed to, the
potential increased after-tax cost of our executive compensation
program that would arise because of the $500,000 deduction
limitation. As a result, while the committee will remain mindful
of the deduction limitation, it has concluded that the $500,000
deduction limitation will not be a significant factor in its
decision-making with respect to the compensation of our
executive officers.
183
Financial
Restatement
It is the board of directors policy that the compensation
committee will, to the extent permitted by governing law, have
the sole and absolute authority to make retroactive adjustments
to any cash or equity based incentive compensation paid to
executive officers and certain other officers where the payment
was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results
that were subsequently the subject of a restatement. Where
applicable, the Company will seek to recover any amount
determined to have been inappropriately received by the
individual executive.
In addition, under the CPP we must condition the payment of
bonus and incentive compensation paid to the senior executive
officers based on financial statements or financial performance
to repayment if such financial statements or performance figures
later prove to be materially inaccurate. ARRA expands this rule
so that it applies to the five senior executive officers and the
next twenty highest paid employees.
Timing
of Stock Option Grants and Restricted Stock Awards
Midwest has adopted a policy on stock option grants and
restricted stock awards that includes the following provisions
relating to the timing of the award:
|
|
|
|
|
Except for inducement grants for new executives, we determined
all restricted stock awards and stock option grants at a
compensation committee meeting held during the first quarter of
2009.
|
|
|
|
Midwest executives do not have any role in selecting the grant
date.
|
|
|
|
The grant date of the stock options and restricted stock is
always the date of approval of the grants (unless a later date
is determined by the committee).
|
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table discloses information concerning the
compensation of the named executive officers during the years
ending December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
($)(c)
|
|
|
($)(d)
|
|
|
($)(e)(1)
|
|
|
($)(f)(2)
|
|
|
($)(g)(3)
|
|
|
(4)(h)
|
|
|
($)(f)(4)
|
|
|
($)(j)
|
|
|
J.J. Fritz(5)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
331,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
86,021
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
402,908
|
|
|
$
|
81,700
|
|
|
$
|
902,129
|
|
President and Chief Operating
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
315,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
809,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,981
|
|
|
|
115,497
|
|
|
|
81,174
|
|
|
|
1,386,646
|
|
Officer, Midwest Bank
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
144,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,163
|
|
|
|
698,257
|
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek(6)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
253,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,489
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
319,995
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brogan M. Ptacin(5)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
243,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,631
|
|
|
|
40,684
|
|
|
|
452,641
|
|
Executive Vice President,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
225,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
25,830
|
|
|
|
41,061
|
|
|
|
494,583
|
|
Midwest Bank
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
103,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,381
|
|
|
|
281,996
|
|
Kelly J. OKeeffe(5)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
234,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,059
|
|
|
|
40,418
|
|
|
|
541,889
|
|
Executive Vice President,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
223,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
25,830
|
|
|
|
43,410
|
|
|
|
469,246
|
|
Midwest Bank
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
103,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,668
|
|
|
|
271,283
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
212,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,465
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,499
|
|
|
|
19,856
|
|
|
|
325,966
|
|
Executive Vice President,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
203,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,937
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
59,564
|
|
|
|
16,244
|
|
|
|
344,737
|
|
Midwest Bank
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
194,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,192
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
75,158
|
|
|
|
389,210
|
|
James J. Giancola*
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
601,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
842,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,170
|
|
|
|
483,210
|
|
|
|
2,149,319
|
|
Former President and Chief
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
585,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,960
|
|
|
|
245,870
|
|
|
|
119,546
|
|
|
|
1,939,632
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
560,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
921,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
218,871
|
|
|
|
86,158
|
|
|
|
2,036,294
|
|
Daniel R. Kadolph*
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
109,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,225
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,110
|
|
|
|
155,150
|
|
|
|
281,455
|
|
Former Executive Vice President and
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
181,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,216
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
14,571
|
|
|
|
16,276
|
|
|
|
256,197
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
164,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,953
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
13,052
|
|
|
|
75,880
|
|
|
|
294,095
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mr. Giancola served as president and chief executive
officer of Midwest during 2008. Mr. Fritz replaced him in
these positions on January 29, 2009. Mr. Kadolph
served as executive vice president and chief
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
financial officer until February 12, 2008. He served as
executive vice president and chief administrative officer until
July 7, 2008. Payments made to Mr. Kadolph reflect his
compensation through July 7, 2008 and his severance
payments thereafter.
|
|
(1)
|
|
The amounts in column (e) reflect the dollar amount
recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, in accordance
with the authoritative guidance for stock compensation (ASC
718) of restricted stock awards and thus may include
amounts from awards granted in and prior to 2006. Assumptions
used in the calculation of these amounts are included in
Note 20 Stock Compensation and Restricted Stock
Awards to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008, included in our annual report on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on March 11, 2009.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The amounts in column (f) reflect the dollar amount
recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, in accordance
with the authoritative guidance for stock compensation (ASC
718), of stock option awards and thus includes amounts from
awards granted in and prior to 2006. Assumptions used in the
calculation of this amount are included in
Note 20 Stock Compensation and Restricted Stock
Awards to our audited financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008, included in our annual report on
Form 10-K
with the SEC on March 11, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The amounts in column (g) reflect the cash awards to the
named individuals under our management incentive compensation
plan, which is discussed in further detail under the heading
Annual Management Incentive Compensation Program
above.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The following tables provide information related to column
(i) All Other Compensation (automobile allowance,
club membership fees, matching contributions to our 401(k) plan,
health club, and insurance expenses (long-term disability).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Club Fees
|
|
401(k)
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Health Club
|
|
Insurance
|
|
Other
|
|
J. J. Fritz
|
|
$
|
7,455
|
|
|
$
|
19,470
|
|
|
$
|
16,575
|
|
|
$
|
28,122
|
|
|
$
|
1,416
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,662
|
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brogan M. Ptacin
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
10,436
|
|
|
|
12,198
|
|
|
|
14,920
|
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly J. OKeeffe
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
9,989
|
|
|
|
11,711
|
|
|
|
13,863
|
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
4,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,600
|
|
|
|
3,278
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Giancola
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
|
|
6,875
|
|
|
|
21,515
|
|
|
|
36,088
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,799
|
*
|
Daniel R. Kadolph
|
|
|
2,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,459
|
|
|
|
2,354
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
144,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Club Fees
|
|
401(k)
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Health Club
|
|
Insurance
|
|
Other
|
|
J. J. Fritz
|
|
$
|
6,918
|
|
|
$
|
22,242
|
|
|
$
|
15,750
|
|
|
$
|
33,540
|
|
|
$
|
1,224
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brogan M. Ptacin
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
9,846
|
|
|
|
11,288
|
|
|
|
16,749
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly J. OKeeffe
|
|
|
3,135
|
|
|
|
11,565
|
|
|
|
11,153
|
|
|
|
16,257
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
3,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,192
|
|
|
|
1,632
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Giancola
|
|
|
2,562
|
|
|
|
39,200
|
|
|
|
21,350
|
|
|
|
54,634
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Daniel R. Kadolph
|
|
|
5,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,888
|
|
|
|
1,861
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Club Fees
|
|
401(k)
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Health Club
|
|
Insurance
|
|
Other
|
|
J. J. Fritz
|
|
$
|
4,988
|
|
|
$
|
1,064
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,211
|
|
|
$
|
7,800
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brogan M. Ptacin
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
2,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,755
|
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly J. OKeeffe
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,168
|
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
3,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,855
|
|
|
|
8,656
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
James J. Giancola
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,592
|
|
|
|
59,740
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel R. Kadolph
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,250
|
|
|
|
7,939
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Midwest has determined it made an error in the original
W-2
reporting for James J. Giancola relating to restricted stock
awards vesting in 2005, 2006 and 2007. It failed to include
income related to the vesting of restricted stock in
Mr. Giancolas
W-2s
which
resulted in the failure to report non-cash income that should
have been included in the
W-2s.
Due to
these reporting failures, Midwest did not withhold sufficient
funds from Mr. Giancolas compensation or pay such
funds as withholding to federal and state taxing authorities,
which have now been paid. Midwest has paid $415,799 to
Mr. Giancola to settle this matter.
|
|
**
|
|
In 2006, we amended our officers personal day policy
(which had allowed officers to accumulate their personal days
and to be paid for them upon termination of the officers
employment). As part of these revisions, we distributed the
funds accrued under the plan to the officer participants.
|
|
(5)
|
|
2006 compensation was from July 1, 2006 to
December 31, 2006. Mr. Fritzs compensation in
column (h) reflects the fact that he vested in his SERP
during 2008.
|
|
(6)
|
|
2008 compensation was from March 17, 2008 to
December 31, 2008.
|
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
The following table presents information relating to non-stock
grants of incentive plan awards, stock based incentive plan
awards and awards of options, restricted stock and similar
instruments under plans that are performance based which were
granted in 2008.
The table also shows the equity based compensation awards
granted in 2008 that are not performance based where the payout
or future value is tied to the Companys stock price and
not to other performance criteria. We did not grant any stock
options to the named executive officers during 2008.
The awards described below (f) (h) were made in
2008 based upon 2007 performance. No awards were made for 2008
performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
or Base
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Price of
|
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
or Units
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Name(a)
|
|
Date(b)
|
|
|
($)(c)
|
|
|
($)(d)
|
|
|
($)(e)
|
|
|
(#)(f)
|
|
|
(#)(g)
|
|
|
(#)(h)
|
|
|
(#)(i)
|
|
|
(#)(j)
|
|
|
($/Sh)(k)
|
|
|
(l)
|
|
|
J. J. Fritz
|
|
|
3/10/08
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
232,050
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
|
3/10/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,900
|
|
|
|
132,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,214
|
|
|
|
94,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brogan M. Ptacin
|
|
|
3/10/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,410
|
|
|
|
106,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,864
|
|
|
|
76,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly J. OKeeffe
|
|
|
3/10/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,870
|
|
|
|
93,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,479
|
|
|
|
66,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
3/10/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,761
|
|
|
|
84,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,829
|
|
|
|
60,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Giancola
|
|
|
3/10/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts in columns (c)-(e) represent possible payouts under the
incentive plan for 2008 while shares listed in columns (f)-(h)
represent restricted stock awards under the incentive plan
awarded in 2008 for 2007 performance. For a discussion of our
incentive plan awards, see Annual Management Incentive
Compensation Program.
|
186
Outstanding
Equity Awards At Fiscal Year-End
The following table summarizes for each named executive officer
the information regarding outstanding stock and option awards at
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
Shares, Units
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock that
|
|
|
Stock that
|
|
|
or Other
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Rights that
|
|
|
that Have
|
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
|
Vested ($)
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
Not Vested
|
|
Name(s)
|
|
Exercisable(b)
|
|
|
(c)(2)
|
|
|
(#)(d)
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
Date(f)
|
|
|
(g)(2)
|
|
|
(h)(1)
|
|
|
Vested (#)(i)
|
|
|
($)(j)
|
|
|
J. J. Fritz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,902
|
(3)
|
|
|
16,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Fritz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Fritz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,163
|
(3)
|
|
|
12,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brogan M. Ptacin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brogan M. Ptacin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,947
|
(5)
|
|
|
4,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brogan M. Ptacin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,964
|
(5)
|
|
|
11,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly J. OKeeffe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly J. OKeeffe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
(6)
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly J. OKeeffe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,792
|
(6)
|
|
|
8,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
|
|
4/14/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.09
|
|
|
|
1/28/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.83
|
|
|
|
8/2/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
|
|
3/29/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.90
|
|
|
|
3/27/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.03
|
|
|
|
7/1/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.43
|
|
|
|
7/1/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
(7)
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,526
|
(7)
|
|
|
3,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,068
|
(7)
|
|
|
7,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Giancola
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Giancola
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,316
|
(8)
|
|
|
41,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Giancola
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
15,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Giancola
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,326
|
(8)
|
|
|
25,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Market values are based on the closing price of our common stock
($1.40) on December 31, 2008 (the last trading day of
2008) as reported by Nasdaq.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Unvested options and restricted stock awards vest following a
change-in-control.
|
|
(3)
|
|
11,902 shares vest on July 1, 2011; 6,000 shares
vest on December 29, 2011 and 9,163 shares vest on
January 28, 2013.
|
|
(4)
|
|
5,000 shares vested on March 17, 2009.
|
|
(5)
|
|
30,000 shares vest on July 1, 2011; 2,947 shares
vest on December 29, 2011 and 7,964 shares vest on
January 28, 2013.
|
|
(6)
|
|
30,000 shares vest on July 1, 2011; 1,684 shares
vest on December 29, 2011 and 5,792 shares vest on
January 28, 2013.
|
|
(7)
|
|
2,500 shares vest on July 1, 2010; 2,526 shares
vest on December 29, 2011 and 5,068 shares will vest
on January 28, 2013.
|
|
(8)
|
|
30,000 shares vested on January 1, 2009. The remaining
shares will be forfeited on March 30, 2009 when
Mr. Giancolas employment with Midwest ends.
|
187
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested in Last Fiscal Year
The following table summarizes for each named executive officer
the number of shares acquired and amounts received upon exercise
of options and vesting of restricted stock for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Acquired
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
Shares Acquired
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
|
on Exercise (#)
|
|
|
on Exercise ($)
|
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
|
on Vesting ($)
|
|
Name(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)(1)
|
|
|
(#)(d)
|
|
|
(e)(2)
|
|
|
J. J. Fritz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brogan M. Ptacin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly OKeeffe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Giancola
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
Daniel R. Kadolph
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The amount represents the aggregate amount realized determined
by subtracting the exercise price of the options from the market
price on the date the options were exercised.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The amount represents the aggregate amount realized determined
by multiplying the number of shares by the market value as of
the vesting date.
|
Pension
Benefits Table
The following table sets forth for each named executive officer
the specified years of credited service and the estimated
present value of accumulated benefits under our supplemental
executive retirement plan. The benefits information regarding
the supplemental executive retirement plans can be found under
the heading Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Years
|
|
|
Present Value of
|
|
|
Payments During
|
|
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
|
Credited Service
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Name(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(#)(c)
|
|
|
Benefit ($)(d)
|
|
|
($)(e)
|
|
|
J. J. Fritz
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
571,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brogan M. Ptacin
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
58,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly OKeefe
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
75,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
441,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Giancola(1)
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
686,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel R. Kadolph(2)
|
|
|
SERP
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mr. Giancolas employment with Midwest ended on
March 30, 2009. Under the terms of his SERP, he is entitled
to receive a yearly early retirement benefit of $105,263 for
15 years.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. Kadolphs employment with Midwest ended on
July 7, 2008. He is fully vested in the early termination
benefit under his SERP.
|
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation
The named executive officers did not receive any non-tax
qualified deferred compensation that Midwest is obligated to pay
during 2008.
188
Equity
Compensation Plan Information as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
be Issued Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding
|
|
|
|
of Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Securities Reflected in
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants, and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants, and Rights
|
|
|
Column (a))
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
|
|
|
959,272
|
|
|
|
15.50
|
|
|
|
1,881,507
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
18.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
989,272
|
|
|
|
15.60
|
|
|
|
1,881,507
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The Companys Stock and Incentive Plan permits
3,900,000 shares for issuance as either incentive stock
options, nonqualified stock options, or restricted shares. As of
December 31, 2008, 980,516 options were exercised.
|
Employment
Agreements
Employment Agreement with Roberto R.
Herencia.
Effective May 15, 2009,
Mr. Herencia was appointed president and chief executive
officer of Midwest and the Bank as well as to the board of
directors of Midwest and the Bank. At that time, Mr. Fritz,
the then-current president and chief executive officer of
Midwest and the Bank, became senior executive vice president of
Midwest.
Mr. Herencia entered into an employment agreement with
Midwest and the Bank, pursuant to which he receives a base
salary of $500,000 per year. Upon the termination of
Mr. Herencias employment, he will be entitled to
(i) payment of any earned but unpaid base salary accrued
through and including the date of termination; (ii) payment
of any earned but unpaid annual bonus from a prior fiscal year,
(iii) payment of accrued paid time off;
(iv) reimbursement of any unreimbursed business expenses,
incurred prior to the date of termination, plus (v) any
vested benefits accrued under Midwests employee benefits
through the date of termination (collectively (i)-(v) being the
Accrued Compensation).
Mr. Herencia may terminate his agreement for good reason
(as defined in the agreement). If Mr. Herencia is
terminated without cause or terminates his employment for good
reason, he shall, in addition to his Accrued Compensation, be
entitled to his base salary for a period of twelve months
following the date of termination, plus continuation of medical,
dental and vision coverage at active employee rates for that
same period. In addition, he shall become fully vested in
certain restricted stock awards outstanding at that time as
contemplated by the agreement (the RSA Award). To
the extent that Section 111 of EESA and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder as amended by
Section 7001 of ARRA and the rules and regulations to be
promulgated thereunder limit Midwests ability to pay such
payments and benefits or to allow the vesting of the RSA Award,
such payments and benefits will be paid
and/or
provided (and the RSA Award will vest) at such time as they are
permitted under EESA and ARRA.
Mr. Herencia has agreed that for a one-year period
following the termination of his employment, he will not solicit
employees of Midwest or customers of Midwest.
Employment Agreement with J. J. Fritz.
On
May 6, 2009, the Company announced that J.J. Fritz, the
Companys then-current president and chief executive
officer of the Company and the Bank, would become senior
executive vice president of the Company on May 15, 2009.
Additionally, Mr. Fritz resigned as a director of the
Company and the Bank effective May 15, 2009. Also, on
May 15, 2009, the Company entered into a new employment
agreement with Mr. Fritz terminating his old agreement.
Under the new agreement, Mr. Fritz will receive a base
salary of $331,500 per year until May 14, 2012. His base
salary did not change. His old agreement terminated on
November 1, 2010 and provided him with an option at that
date to receive a lump-sum payment equal to one years base
salary.
189
As provided in his old agreement, the new agreement requires the
Company to provide Company-paid health insurance coverage, to be
no less comprehensive than the health insurance coverage
provided to all other employees, for Mr. Fritz and his
spouse until such time as he and his spouse reach age sixty-five
or such later date as necessary for Medicare eligibility.
In the event that Mr. Fritzs employment is terminated
by the Company prior to May 14, 2012, unless such
termination by the Company is for cause (as defined in the
agreement), Mr. Fritz shall continue to receive the
compensation and benefits as provided in the agreement until
May 14, 2012. In the event Mr. Fritz is terminated for
cause or he terminates his employment for any reason, the
Company shall have no obligation to make any payment to him
under the agreement other than an amount equal to his base
salary on a prorated basis to the date of termination.
Mr. Fritz has agreed to comply with certain
non-solicitation and non-compete provisions for a one-year
period from the last day on which he receives a timely payment
of his base salary (the Restriction Period).
Because of the Companys participation in the EESA
Programs, Mr. Fritz and the Company have agreed to amend
the agreement if, and as may be, required by the regulatory
guidance issued pursuant to the EESA and the ARRA. In this
regard, the agreement, as amended, shall impose the minimum
level of limitations on payments under the agreement as are
required to permit the Company to comply with the limitations on
executive compensation under the EESA Programs.
If any amounts or benefits due or payable pursuant to the
agreement are not payable during the period the Company
participates in the EESA Programs, the Companys
obligations, absent such restrictions, shall continue, and all
payments and benefits which would otherwise have been paid or
provided shall be immediately paid and provided as soon as
legally permissible. The Company, however, shall not be
obligated to make such payments or provide such benefits if it
is prohibited from doing so by EESA or ARRA or the rules and
regulations issued, or to be issued, thereunder.
Agreement with JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek.
On
February 15, 2008, Midwest announced that JoAnn S. Lilek
had been appointed to serve as executive vice president and
chief financial officer of the Company effective March 17,
2008. Ms. Lilek has entered into a letter agreement with
Midwest concerning the terms of her employment which provide
that: (i) her salary will be $330,000 per year for 2008;
(ii) she will receive an award of 5,000 restricted
shares of Company common stock which vested on March 17,
2009 because she was still employed by Midwest; (iii) she
will be eligible to participate in Midwests management
incentive plan and stock and incentive plan; and (iv) she
will be eligible to receive one year of severance if she is
terminated without cause. The Company has entered into a
Transitional Employment Agreement with Ms. Lilek and she
will participate in Midwests supplemental executive
retirement plan
Transitional
Employment Agreements
The Company and certain subsidiaries of the Company have entered
into separate transitional employment agreements with certain of
the named executive officers (Ms. Lilek and
Messrs. Ptacin, OKeeffe and Bernstein) and certain
other officers of the Companys subsidiaries. The
agreements are designed to mitigate the impact of
change-in-control
transactions on the performance of key officers and executives.
In the event of a
change-in-control
(generally, the acquisition of 50% or more of the fair market
value of our stock or our voting power, the change in a majority
of the members of our board of directors under certain
circumstances or the sale of more than 50% of the assets of the
Company or the relevant subsidiary), the agreements require the
Company, the relevant subsidiary or any successor, as the case
may be, to continue the employment of the affected officers for
either 12 or 24 months in their respective positions and at
their respective salaries (including the payment of
directors fees, if any) with the right to participate in
new or continuing incentive, benefit and other plans.
In the event the employment of an officer is terminated by
(1) the officer for good reason during one to
two years following the
change-in-control
(e.g., a material reduction in salary, a material diminution in
authority, duties or responsibility, or a material change in the
geographic location at which the employee performs services)
(subject to the requirement that certain officers must wait
90 days following the initial
190
existence of one of the good reason conditions to exercise such
right of termination), or (2) by an acquirer for any reason
other than death, disability or cause, the acquirer is obligated
to continue the affected officers salary (including the
payment of directors fees, if any) for 12 or
24 months after the termination of employment and the
affected officer is prohibited from soliciting customers and
employees of the Company for 12 months or 24 months,
respectively.
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan
The Company has implemented a supplemental executive retirement
plan, the SERP, for the purpose of providing certain retirement
benefits to those executive and other corporate officers of the
Company and its subsidiaries approved by the board of directors.
The annual retirement benefit available under the SERP is
calculated to range from 20% to 35% of final salary (as defined
in the SERP agreement) at normal retirement age of 65 and is
payable over 15 years. Benefits are payable in various
forms in the event of normal retirement, early retirement,
death, disability, and separation from service, subject to
certain conditions defined in the plan. The SERP also provides
for the payment of certain death benefits. The SERP also
provides for lump sum payment of the present value of a
percentage of SERP benefits if employment is terminated
following a
change-in-control.
All of the named executive officers participate in the SERP. In
addition, 35 other officers also participate in the SERP. For
information relating to the amounts we contributed to the SERPs
in 2008 for the named executive officers, see column (h) in
the Summary Compensation Table.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination of Employment or
Change-in-Control
The tables below in this section reflect the amount of
compensation to each of our named executive officers as of
December 31, 2008 in the event of termination of such
executives employment. The amount of compensation payable
to each named executive officer upon voluntary termination,
early retirement, involuntary
not-for-cause
termination, termination for cause, termination following a
change-in-control
and in the event of disability or death of the executive is
shown below. The amounts shown assume that such termination was
effective as of December 31, 2008 and thus includes amounts
earned through such time and are estimates of the amounts which
would be paid out to the executives upon their termination. The
actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time
of such executives separation from the Company.
Payments
Made Upon Termination
Regardless of the manner in which a named executive
officers employment terminates, he or she is entitled to
receive amounts earned during his or her term of employment.
Such amounts include:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-equity incentive compensation earned under our management
incentive compensation;
|
|
|
|
Amounts contributed under our 401(k) plan;
|
|
|
|
Unused earned vacation; and
|
|
|
|
Amounts accrued and vested through the officers
SERP. No benefit is paid if employment is terminated
for cause.
|
If Mr. Fritzs employment is terminated by the Company
without cause prior to November 1, 2010, he will receive
his base salary and incentive compensation for a period of three
years.
Payments
Made Upon Retirement
In the event of retirement of a named executive, in addition to
earned non-equity incentive compensation, 401(k) contributions
and unused vacation, he or she will receive the following
amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
All stock options fully vest and must be exercised within one
year from the date of normal retirement (age 65). Options
must be exercised within three months from date of early
retirement (age 55).
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
At normal retirement all outstanding restrictions are lifted on
performance accelerated restricted stock. Outstanding restricted
shares are forfeited if executive retires before age 65.
|
|
|
|
At normal retirement, a percentage of final salary as defined by
the executives SERP is paid in monthly installments over
fifteen years. An amount equal to an increasing percentage of
the executives normal benefit amount is paid at early
retirement beginning at age 60 (50% at age 60, 60% at
age 61, 70% at age 62, 80% at age 63, and 90% at
age 64).
|
Payments
Made Upon Death or Disability
In the event of the death or disability of a named executive, in
addition to earned non-equity incentive compensation, 401(k)
contributions and unused vacation, he or she will receive the
following amounts.
|
|
|
|
|
All stock options fully vest and must be exercised within one
year.
|
|
|
|
All outstanding restrictions are lifted on performance
accelerated restricted stock and the shares fully vest.
|
|
|
|
If the executive terminates employment due to a disability, a
percentage of current salary as defined by the executives
SERP is paid in monthly installments over fifteen years
beginning the month following the executives
65th birthday.
|
|
|
|
Under the SERP, if the executive dies while in active service
death benefits will be provided by way of a compensatory
split-dollar life insurance arrangement in an amount equal to
the age 65 accrual balance. If the executive dies during
payment of a benefit the remaining benefits will be paid to the
executives beneficiary. If the executive dies after
termination of employment but before the benefit starts, the
beneficiary will be paid the same benefits that the executive
was entitled to prior to death.
|
In the event of Mr. Fritzs death, his estate will
continue to receive his base salary for 90 days along with
employer paid health insurance coverage for his spouse through
age 65.
Payments
Made Upon a
Change-in-Control
We have entered into employment agreements or transitional
employment agreements with each named executive officer. If an
executives employment is terminated following a
change-in-control
or the executive terminates his employment in certain
circumstances defined in the agreement, in addition to earned
non-equity incentive compensation, 401(k) contributions and
unused vacation, he will receive the following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
All stock options fully vest.
|
|
|
|
All outstanding restrictions are lifted on performance
accelerated restricted stock and the shares fully vest.
|
|
|
|
Under the SERP, the executive is paid the present value of a
percentage of the age 65 projected benefit.
|
|
|
|
The named executives, except Mr. Fritz, have entered into
transitional employment agreements which provide for a payment
equal to two times annual salary and cash incentive
compensation. They are also eligible to continue insurance
benefits under COBRA at the employee cost sharing rate for two
years.
|
|
|
|
Mr. Fritzs employment agreement provides a monthly
payment equal to 1/12th of his average total annual
compensation for the last three years of full time employment
payable for a period of 35 months. He is also eligible for
employer paid health insurance coverage for himself and his wife
through age 65. These payments may not exceed 299% of his
base amount (as defined in Section 280G(b)(3) of the Code.
|
Employment
Terminations of Named Executive Officers
Mr. Giancola served as president and chief executive
officer of Midwest during 2008. He was replaced by
Mr. Fritz on January 29, 2009, and continued as an
employee of Midwest until March 30, 2009. A description
192
of the payments made or owed to Mr. Giancola as of his date
of termination is contained under the subcaption
Employment Agreement with James J. Giancola above.
Mr. Kadolph served as executive vice president and chief
financial officer of Midwest until February 12, 2008. He
served as executive vice president and chief administrative
officer of Midwest until July 7, 2008. On August 6,
2008, Midwest and Mr. Kadolph reached an agreement on his
severance which provides, among other things, that (1) he
will receive 39 weeks of severance for a total of $139,577,
plus an additional 13 weeks of severance if he has not
found employment at the end of the 39 week period;
(2) the Company will pay his monthly COBRA premiums during
the severance period; (3) he is fully vested in his early
termination benefit under his SERP; (4) he was paid the
fair market value (as of July 7, 2008) of his 7,001
unvested shares of restricted stock; and (5) Midwest will
pay for tax planning and executive outplacement services for him
of up to $17,500 and will transfer title to him of his Company
car.
EESA
and ARRA
The following tables (and the preceding discussion) do not
reflect the limitation on the timing or amount of payments upon
departure from Midwest for any reason which may be imposed by
the EESA or ARRA.
The following table shows the potential payments upon
termination or change of control of Midwest for J. J. Fritz as
if such events had occurred on December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not for
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Benefits and
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
Early
|
|
|
Normal
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
(Change-in-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Upon Separation
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Control)
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management incentive compensation plan
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Benefits & Perquisites:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock awards(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,891
|
|
|
|
37,891
|
|
|
|
37,891
|
|
401(k) plan(2)
|
|
|
69,484
|
|
|
|
69,484
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
69,484
|
|
|
|
69,484
|
|
|
|
69,484
|
|
|
|
69,484
|
|
|
|
69,484
|
|
Retirement plans including SERP(3)
|
|
|
631,049
|
|
|
|
631,049
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
631,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746,174
|
|
|
|
1,262,099
|
|
|
|
1,200,847
|
|
Health and welfare benefits(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
36,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,003
|
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
Disability income(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
413,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance benefits(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582,875
|
|
Excise tax and
gross-up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
994,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,084,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued vacation pay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
700,533
|
|
|
$
|
700,533
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1,731,927
|
|
|
$
|
69,484
|
|
|
$
|
1,978,538
|
|
|
$
|
1,785,066
|
|
|
$
|
1,893,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects the value of all unvested stock option and restricted
stock awards shares that would vest.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reflects the value of Mr. Fritzs 401(k) plan.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of qualified and
non-qualified retirement plans to which Mr. Fritz would be
entitled.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of all future
premiums which will be paid on behalf of Mr. Fritz under
our health and welfare benefit plans.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of all future
payments which Mr. Fritz would be entitled to receive under
our disability program. Mr. Fritz would be entitled to
receive such benefits until he reaches age 65.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The amount reflected under the heading Death
reflects the estimated present value of the proceeds payable to
Mr. Fritzs beneficiaries upon his death.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Mr. Fritz does not qualify for normal retirement based on
his age.
|
193
The following table shows the potential payments upon
termination or change of control of Midwest for
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek as if such events had occurred on
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not for
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
Early
|
|
|
Normal
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
(Change-in-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Control)
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management incentive compensation plan
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Benefits & Perquisites:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock awards(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
401(k) plan(2)
|
|
|
11,899
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
11,899
|
|
|
|
11,899
|
|
|
|
11,899
|
|
|
|
11,899
|
|
|
|
11,899
|
|
Retirement plans including SERP(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657,340
|
|
|
|
760,729
|
|
|
|
1,636,005
|
|
Health and welfare benefits(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability income(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
676,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance benefits(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
Excise tax and
gross-up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
330,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued vacation pay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,899
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
341,899
|
|
|
$
|
11,899
|
|
|
$
|
1,353,124
|
|
|
$
|
1,455,796
|
|
|
$
|
2,314,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects the value of all unvested stock option and restricted
stock awards shares that would vest.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reflects the value of Ms. Lileks 401(k) plan.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of qualified and
non-qualified retirement plans to which Ms. Lilek would be
entitled.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of all future
premiums which will be paid on behalf of Ms. Lilek under
our health and welfare benefit plans.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of all future
payments which Ms. Lilek would be entitled to receive under
our disability program. Ms. Lilek would be entitled to
receive such benefits until she reaches age 65.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The amount reflected under the heading Death
reflects the estimated present value of the proceeds payable to
Ms. Lileks beneficiaries upon her death.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Ms. Lilek does not qualify for either early retirement or
normal retirement based on her age.
|
194
The following table shows the potential payments upon
termination or change of control of Midwest for Brogan M. Ptacin
as if such events had occurred on December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not for
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Benefits and
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
Early
|
|
|
Normal
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
(Change-in-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Upon Separation
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Control)
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management incentive compensation plan
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Benefits & Perquisites:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock awards(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,275
|
|
|
|
57,275
|
|
|
|
57,275
|
|
401(k) plan(2)
|
|
|
48,628
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
48,628
|
|
|
|
48,628
|
|
|
|
48,628
|
|
|
|
48,628
|
|
|
|
48,628
|
|
Retirement plans including SERP(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453,776
|
|
|
|
501,007
|
|
|
|
1,374,745
|
|
Health and welfare benefits(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability income(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance benefits(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534,000
|
|
Excise tax and
gross-up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
133,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued vacation pay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
48,628
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
182,128
|
|
|
$
|
48,628
|
|
|
$
|
1,119,006
|
|
|
$
|
1,413,706
|
|
|
$
|
2,014,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects the value of all unvested stock option and restricted
stock awards shares that would vest.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reflects the value of Mr. Ptacins 401(k) plan.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of qualified and
non-qualified retirement plans to which Mr. Ptacin would be
entitled.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of all future
premiums which will be paid on behalf of Mr. Ptacin under
our health and welfare benefit plans.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of all future
payments which Mr. Ptacin would be entitled to receive
under our disability program. Mr. Ptacin would be entitled
to receive such benefits until he reaches age 65.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The amount reflected under the heading Death
reflects the estimated present value of the proceeds payable to
Mr. Ptacins beneficiaries upon his death.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Mr. Ptacin does not qualify for either early retirement or
normal retirement based on his age.
|
195
The following table shows the potential payments upon
termination or change of control of Midwest for
Kelly J. OKeeffe as if such events had occurred
on December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not for
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Benefits and
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
Early
|
|
|
Normal
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
(Change-in-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Upon Separation
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Control)
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management incentive compensation plan
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Benefits & Perquisites:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock awards(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,466
|
|
|
|
52,466
|
|
|
|
52,466
|
|
401(k) plan(2)
|
|
|
43,396
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
43,396
|
|
|
|
43,396
|
|
|
|
43,396
|
|
|
|
43,396
|
|
|
|
43,396
|
|
Retirement plans including SERP(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446,174
|
|
|
|
439,491
|
|
|
|
1,303,893
|
|
Health and welfare benefits(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability income(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
806,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance benefits(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
468,436
|
|
Excise tax and
gross-up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
117,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
468,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued vacation pay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
43,396
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
160,505
|
|
|
$
|
43,396
|
|
|
$
|
1,035,781
|
|
|
$
|
1,342,149
|
|
|
$
|
1,868,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects the value of all unvested stock option and restricted
stock awards shares that would vest.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reflects the value of Mr. OKeeffes 401(k) plan.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of qualified and
non-qualified retirement plans to which Mr. OKeeffe
would be entitled.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of all future
premiums which will be paid on behalf of Mr. OKeeffe
under our health and welfare benefit plans.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of all future
payments which Mr. OKeeffe would be entitled to
receive under our disability program. Mr. OKeeffe
would be entitled to receive such benefits until he reaches
age 65.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The amount reflected under the heading Death
reflects the estimated present value of the proceeds payable to
Mr. OKeeffes beneficiaries upon his death.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Mr. OKeeffe does not qualify for either early
retirement or normal retirement based on his age.
|
196
The following table shows the potential payments upon
termination or change of control of Midwest for Sheldon
Bernstein as if such events had occurred on December 31,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involuntary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not for
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Benefits and
|
|
Voluntary
|
|
|
Early
|
|
|
Normal
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
|
For Cause
|
|
|
(Change-in-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Upon Separation
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Control)
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
Compensation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management incentive compensation plan
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Benefits & Perquisites:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock awards(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,132
|
|
|
|
14,132
|
|
|
|
14,132
|
|
401(k) plan(2)
|
|
|
274,998
|
|
|
|
274,998
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
274,998
|
|
|
|
274,998
|
|
|
|
274,998
|
|
|
|
274,998
|
|
|
|
274,998
|
|
Retirement plans including SERP(3)
|
|
|
500,759
|
|
|
|
500,759
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
500,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505,741
|
|
|
|
834,590
|
|
|
|
738,436
|
|
Health and welfare benefits(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability income(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance benefits(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,006
|
|
Excise tax and
gross-up
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
106,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued vacation pay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
775,757
|
|
|
$
|
775,757
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
881,759
|
|
|
$
|
274,998
|
|
|
$
|
1,227,542
|
|
|
$
|
1,392,639
|
|
|
$
|
1,451,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects the value of all unvested stock option and restricted
stock awards shares that would vest.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reflects the value of Mr. Bernsteins 401(k) plan.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of qualified and
non-qualified retirement plans to which Mr. Bernstein would
be entitled.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of all future
premiums which will be paid on behalf of Mr. Bernstein
under our health and welfare benefit plans.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of all future
payments which Mr. Bernstein would be entitled to receive
under our disability program. Mr. Bernstein would be
entitled to receive such benefits until he reaches age 65.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The amount reflected under the heading Death
reflects the estimated present value of the proceeds payable to
Mr. Bernsteins beneficiaries upon his death.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Mr. Bernstein does not qualify for normal retirement based
on his age.
|
197
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information as of
September 30, 2009, for: (1) those people believed by
management to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of our
common stock; (2) members of the board of directors of
Midwest; and (3) certain executive officers of Midwest. The
table includes, with respect to directors, the year in which
each became a director of Midwest. The table also sets forth the
amount of our common stock (and Depositary Shares) and the
percent thereof beneficially owned by each director and
executive officer and by all executive officers as a group.
Ownership information is based upon information furnished by the
respective individuals. On December 5, 2008, Midwest
completed the sale to the USG of $84.78 million of its
non-voting cumulative perpetual preferred shares as part of the
USGs Capital Purchase Program, and issued the Warrant to
the USG to purchase 4,282,020 shares of Midwest common
stock for $2.97 per share. The Warrant shares represent
approximately 15% of the shares of common stock outstanding as
of September 30, 2009. The shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of the warrant are assumed to be outstanding
for purposes of determining the percentage of shares
beneficially owned by the USG. The USG has no voting rights at
this time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director of
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Name(1)
|
|
Since
|
|
|
Owned(2)
|
|
|
Class
|
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percy L. Berger
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Roberto R. Herencia
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
198,412
|
(4)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Barry I. Forrester
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert J. Genetski
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
17,711
|
(6)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gerald F. Hartley
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
*
|
|
E. V. Silveri
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
|
2,254,287
|
(8)
|
|
|
8.07
|
|
Kenneth Velo
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
9,202
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Non-Director,
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,475
|
(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mary C. Ceas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,591
|
(9)(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Sheldon Bernstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,062
|
(9)(11)(12)
|
|
|
*
|
|
J. J. Fritz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,612
|
(10)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas A. Caravello
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,355
|
(9)(11)(15)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Bruno P. Costa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,883
|
(9)(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas J. Bell, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,312
|
(13)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas H. Hackett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,445
|
(9)(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Stephan L. Markovits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,409
|
(9)(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dennis M. Motyka
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,592
|
(9)(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jan R. Thiry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,997
|
(9)(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jonathan P. Gilfillan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
(9)
|
|
|
*
|
|
David Taylor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,240
|
(9)(14)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. 401(k) Plan and Trust
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,595
|
(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,990,268
|
(16)
|
|
|
10.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Less than one percent.
|
|
(1)
|
|
The address of each principal stockholder is 501 West North
Avenue, Melrose Park, Illinois 60160.
|
198
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Unless otherwise stated below, each person has sole voting and
investment power with respect to all such shares.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes 1,000 shares of restricted stock, which will vest
following the 2010 annual meetings, provided, Mr. Berger is
still serving as a director and 30,000 shares of restricted
stock, which will vest on January 1, 2010, provided
Mr. Berger is serving as Chairman of the Board of Directors.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes 198,412 shares of restricted stock, which will
vest on December 31, 2009 or such later date as may be
required in order to comply with Section 111(b)(3)(D) of
ESSA as amended by Section 7001 of ARRA and the rules and
regulations to be promulgated thereunder.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes 11,500 shares held by a trust for which
Mr. Forrester acts as trustee and 5,000 shares held in
an IRA account for the benefit of Mr. Forrester and
3,500 shares held in an IRA account for the benefit of
Mr. Forresters spouse.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes 10,671 shares held in an IRA account for the
benefit of Dr. Genetski.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes 19,500 shares held in an IRA account for the
benefit of Mr. Hartley and 2,000 shares held by trusts
for which Mr. Hartley acts as trustee.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Includes 12,312 shares held by trusts for which
Mr. Silveri acts as trustee; 52,074 shares held
directly by Mr. Silveris spouse; 3,150 shares
held by trusts for which Mr. Silveris spouse acts as
trustee; and 1,307,056 shares held by Go-Tane Service
Stations, Inc., a company controlled by Mr. Silveri, and
the Go-Tane Pension Plan.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Includes shares of restricted stock, which will vest on
July 1, 2010 as follows: Costa
2,000 shares; Ceas 1,000 shares;
Bernstein, and Caravello 2,500 shares each; and
Hackett 1,500 shares. Includes shares of
restricted stock, which will vest on December 31, 2011 as
follows: Costa 2,526 shares, Ceas
842 shares, Bernstein 2,526 shares,
Caravello 2,526 shares, Hackett
1,684 shares and Motyka 1,684 shares.
Includes 10,000 shares of restricted stock held by
Markovits which will vest on October 1, 2012. Includes
shares of restricted stock which will vest on January 28,
2013 as follows: Costa 4,344 shares;
Ceas 2,896 shares; Bernstein
5,062 shares; Caravello 5,068 shares,
Hackett 2,896 shares, Markovits
2,896 shares, Motyka 3,620 shares and
Thiry 2,896 shares. Includes 7,500 shares
of restricted stock held by Gilfillan which will vest on
July 7, 2013. Includes 10,000 shares of restricted
stock held by Taylor which will vest on August 19, 2013.
Includes 2,000 shares of restricted stock held by Ceas
which will vest on February 23, 2012. Include shares
subject to currently exercisable options as follows:
Ceas 20,398 shares; Bernstein
55,928 shares; Caravello 4,500 shares;
Costa 58,101 shares; and Hackett
3,000 shares.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Includes 11,902 shares of restricted stock which will vest
on July 1, 2011, 6,000 shares of restricted stock
which will vest on December 29, 2011, 91,163 shares of
restricted stock which will vest on January 28, 2013,
1,500 shares held in an IRA account for the benefit of
Mr. Fritz, 7,500 shares held by a trust for which
Mr. Fritz acts as trustee, and 116 shares held by
Mr. Fritz spouse.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Includes shares held in Midwests 401(k) Plan as follows:
Ceas 3,540 shares; Bernstein
1,740 shares; Caravello 2,678 shares;
Costa 712 shares; Hackett
2,365 shares; Lilek 975 shares;
Motyka 1,258 shares; Thiry
3,526 shares; and 119,595 shares held by other
employees.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Includes 17,300 shares held by a trust for which
Mr. Bernstein acts as trustee.
|
|
(13)
|
|
Includes 2,000 shares held by trusts for which
Mr. Bell acts as trustee.
|
|
(14)
|
|
Includes 6,240 shares held by Mr. Taylors spouse.
|
|
(15)
|
|
Includes Depositary Shares are convertible at the holders
option at any time and at the option of Midwest (if certain
conditions are met) five years after the issuance date into the
following number of shares of common stock:
Mr. Rosenquist 12,165 shares and
Mr. Caravello 3,333 shares.
|
|
(16)
|
|
Includes an aggregate 141,937 shares subject to currently
exercisable options (which are also included in the totals
above) and 136,389 shares (which are also included in the
totals above), held in the Companys 401(k) Plan, for which
American Stock Transfer Company, acts as trustee. The trustee
under the 401(k) Plan has sole voting and investment power with
respect to such shares.
|
199
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The board of directors has adopted a policy concerning the
approval of related party transactions transactions
between the Company and its subsidiaries and our related
parties, our directors, officers or principal stockholders, and
their respective family members and businesses they control.
Except as noted below, any related party transaction may be
consummated or may continue only if:
|
|
|
|
|
the corporate governance and nominating committee shall approve
or ratify such transaction in accordance with the guidelines set
forth in the policy; or
|
|
|
|
the transaction is approved or ratified by a majority of the
disinterested, independent members of our board (the
independent directors); or
|
|
|
|
the transaction involves compensation approved by our
compensation committee or the board of directors.
|
All related party transactions where the amount involved is less
than $100,000 may be approved by our chief executive officer and
if so approved shall be presented for ratification to the
committee or a majority of the independent directors.
All loans to a related party shall be approved by the board of
directors of the Bank as required by Regulation O of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and by a
majority of the independent directors. Any loan to a related
party: (i) must be made in the ordinary course of business;
(ii) must be made on substantially the same terms,
including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at
the time for comparable loans with persons not related to us;
and (iii) must not involve more than the normal risk of
collectibility or present other unfavorable features.
All related party transactions approved by our chief executive
officer must be submitted for ratification by the committee or a
majority of the independent directors. All other related party
transactions (except loans approved as discussed above) shall be
submitted for approval to the committee or a majority of the
independent directors. After such approval, management must
update the committee and the full board of directors as to any
material change to those proposed transactions.
All related party transactions are to be disclosed in our
applicable filings as required by the Securities Act of 1933 and
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Exchange Act, and
related rules. Furthermore, all related party transactions shall
be disclosed to the audit committee and to the full board of
directors.
Some of our executive officers and directors are, and have been
during the preceding year, clients of the Bank and some of our
executive officers and directors are direct or indirect owners
of 10% or more of the equity of entities which are, or have been
in the past, clients of the Bank. As such clients, they have had
transactions in the ordinary course of business of the Bank,
including borrowings, all of which transactions are or were on
substantially the same terms (including interest rates and
collateral on loans) as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with nonaffiliated persons. At
December 31, 2008, the Companys directors, executive
officers, and their business interests had loans outstanding,
whose individual aggregate indebtedness to the Bank exceeded
$120,000, totaling approximately $47.3 million in the
aggregate, which represented 15.5% of total stockholders
equity as of that date. All such loans were approved in
conformity with the guidelines established by bank regulatory
agencies. In addition, such loans were made in the ordinary
course of business, were made on substantially the same terms,
including interest rate and collateral, as those prevailing at
the time for comparable loans with persons not related to us,
and, in the opinion of management, did not involve more than the
normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable
features.
During 2008, the Company paid $7,500 for subscription to an
economic service provided by Dr. Robert J. Genetski.
The Company made payments totaling $1.4 million in 2008 to
DiPaolo Company, a company controlled by Angelo DiPaolo, a
director of the Company until July 28, 2009, for
construction services described below. The Company also made
payments totaling $127,000 for the purchases of bank owned
vehicles and services on bank owned vehicles performed by Joe
Rizza Ford, a company controlled by Joseph Rizza, a director of
200
the Company until July 28, 2009 (which represented less
than 1% of the consolidated gross revenues of these entities).
On December 29, 2005, the Bank entered into a lease for a
branch office in Franklin Park, Illinois with Crossings
Commercial, LLC, an entity controlled by Angelo DiPaolo. The
lease is for fifteen years and provides for annual rental
payments of approximately $43,500 on average. However, if
another tenant enters into a lease at this facility for a square
foot rental less than what the Bank is paying, the annual rental
for the Bank will be reduced to this amount.
In the first quarter of 2008, the board of directors (including
all of the independent directors) approved an agreement with the
DiPaolo Company pursuant to which the DiPaolo Company made
repairs at one of the Banks branches. The total contract
award is $1.5 million. The Company received three other
bids for this project. Management, after reviewing all of the
bids, concluded that the DiPaolo Company made the best bid for
the work.
OTHER
MATTERS
Submission
of Future Stockholder Proposals
The next annual meeting of stockholders of Midwest will be in
2010. Under SEC rules, a stockholder who intends to present a
proposal at the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders and who
wishes the proposal to be included in the proxy statement for
that meeting must submit the proposal in writing to the
Corporate Secretary of Midwest at 501 West North Avenue,
Melrose Park, IL 60160. The proposal must be received no later
than December 8, 2009.
Stockholders who do not wish to follow the SEC rules in
proposing a matter for action at the 2010 annual meeting must
notify Midwest in writing of the information required by the
provisions of Midwests by-laws dealing with stockholder
proposals. The notice must be delivered to Midwests
Corporate Secretary by January 10, 2009. You can obtain a
copy of Midwests by-laws by writing to the Corporate
Secretary at the above address.
Cost of
Proxy Solicitation
Midwest pays the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to
soliciting proxies by mail, Midwest may solicit proxies by
personal interview, telephone and similar means. No director,
officer or employee of Midwest will be specially compensated for
these activities. Midwest also intends to request that brokers,
banks and other nominees solicit proxies from their principals
and will pay the brokers, banks and other nominees certain
expenses they incur for such activities. Midwest has retained
Morrow & Co., LLC, a proxy soliciting firm, to assist
in the solicitation of proxies, for an estimated fee of $30,000
plus reimbursement of certain
out-of-pocket
expenses.
WHERE YOU
MAY FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any
reports, proxy statements, or other information filed by Midwest
at the SECs public reference room in
Washington, D.C., which is located at the following
address: Public Reference Room, 100 F Street N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You can request copies of these
documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the
SEC at this address. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the operation of the SECs
public reference rooms. Reports, proxy statements and other
information filed by Midwest are also available to the public
from document retrieval services on the Internet at the
SECs website at
http://ww.sec.gov
.
Midwests SEC filings are also available and at the
SECs Internet website
(
http://www.sec.gov
).
Midwests filings with the SEC are also available at its
website at
www.midwestbanc.com
and the offices of the
Nasdaq Global Market. For further information on obtaining
copies of our public filings at the Nasdaq Global Market, you
should call
(212) 656-5060
or visit the Nasdaq Global Market website
http://www.nasdaq.com
.
201
ANNEX A
AUTHORIZED SHARE INCREASE
FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
The undersigned officer of Midwest Banc Holdings Inc., a
corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
Corporation), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:
FIRST:
The name of the Corporation is Midwest
Banc Holdings, Inc.
SECOND:
The first paragraph of Section 4
of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
The total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall
have authority to issue is four billion one million
(4,001,000,000), divided into two classes as follows: one
million (1,000,000) of which shall be preferred stock,
$0.01 par value (the Preferred Stock), and four
billion (4,000,000,000) of which shall be common stock
$0.01 par value (the Common Stock).
THIRD:
The foregoing amendment was duly
adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
FOURTH:
The foregoing amendment shall be
effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware.
A-1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate
of Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer, this
[ ] day of
[ ],
2009.
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
Name:
Title:
A-2
ANNEX B
REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
The undersigned officer of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc., a
corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
Corporation), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:
FIRST:
The name of the Corporation is Midwest
Banc Holdings, Inc.
SECOND:
At the Effective Time, the first
paragraph of Section 4 of the Amended Restated Certificate
of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be hereby amended to
read in its entirety as follows:
The total number of shares of stock which the corporation shall
have authority to issue
is million
( ,000,000), divided into two classes as follows: one
million (1,000,000) of which shall be preferred stock,
$0.01 par value (the Preferred Stock),
and million
( ,000,000) of which shall be common stock
$0.01 par value (the Common Stock). Upon the
filing and effectiveness (the Effective Time)
pursuant to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
(the DGCL) of this certificate of amendment to the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
corporation, each [100] [150] [200] [250] shares of the
Corporations Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share,
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time
shall be combined into one (1) validly issued, fully paid
and non-assessable share of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per
share, without any further action by the corporation or the
holder thereof, subject to the treatment fractional share
interests as described below (the Reverse Stock
Split). No fractional shares of Common Stock shall be
issued in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders
who otherwise would be entitled to receive fractional shares of
Common Stock shall be entitled to receive cash (without interest
or deduction) from the corporations transfer agent in lieu
of such fractional share interests upon the submission of a
transmittal letter by a stockholder holding the shares in
book-entry form and, where shares are held in certificated form,
upon the surrender of the stockholders Old Certificates
(as defined below), in an amount equal to the proceeds
attributable to the sale of such fractional shares following the
aggregation and sale by the corporations transfer agent of
all fractional shares otherwise issuable. Each certificate that
immediately prior to the Effective Time represented shares of
Common Stock (Old Certificates), shall thereafter
represent that number of shares of Common Stock into which the
shares of common stock represented by the Old Certificate shall
have been combined, subject to the elimination of fractional
share interests as described above.
THIRD:
The foregoing amendment was duly
adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
FOURTH:
The foregoing amendment shall be
effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware.
B-1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate
of Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer, this
[ ] day of
[ ],
2009.
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
Name:
Title:
B-2
ANNEX C
PREFERRED STOCK CHANGE
FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
The undersigned officer of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc., a
corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
Corporation), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:
FIRST:
The name of the Corporation is Midwest
Banc Holdings, Inc.
SECOND:
Section 4 of the Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation shall
be hereby amended by deleting paragraph number 3 under the
heading CLASS II: COMMON STOCK and replacing it with the
following:
3. Subject to the provisions of any applicable law or
except as otherwise provided by the resolution or resolutions
providing for the issue of any series of Preferred Stock, the
holders of outstanding shares of Common Stock shall exclusively
possess voting power for the election of directors and for all
other purposes; each holder of record of shares of Common Stock
being entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock
standing in his name on the books of the corporation; provided,
however, that, except as otherwise required by law, holders of
Common Stock shall not be entitled to vote on any amendment to
this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
(including any certificate relating to shares of Preferred Stock
contemplated or authorized by Section 4) that relates
solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of
Preferred Stock if the holders of such affected series are
entitled, either separately or together as a class with the
holders of one or more other such series, to vote thereon
pursuant to this Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation (including any certificate relating to shares of
Preferred Stock contemplated or authorized by this
Section 4 or the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware).
THIRD:
The foregoing amendment was duly
adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
FOURTH:
The foregoing amendment shall be
effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware.
C-1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate
of Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer, this
[ ] day of
[ ],
2009.
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
Name:
Title:
C-2
ANNEX D
DIVIDEND BLOCKER AMENDMENT
FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
The undersigned officer of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc., a
corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
Corporation), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:
FIRST:
The name of the Corporation is Midwest
Banc Holdings, Inc.
SECOND:
Section 6, subsections (c),
(d) and (e) of the certificate of designation of the
Series A Noncumulative Redeemable Convertible Perpetual
Preferred Stock of the Corporation are hereby deleted in their
entirety.
THIRD:
The second to the last sentence of
section 5(b) of the certificate of designation for the
Series A Noncumulative Redeemable Convertible Perpetual
Preferred Stock is hereby amended to read as follows:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, except as otherwise required by
law, the Corporation may, without the consent of any Holder,
(x) authorize, increase the authorized amount of, or issue
shares of Parity Stock and Junior Stock or (y) increase the
amount of authorized shares of Series A Preferred Stock or
issue any additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock;
provided, however, that with respect to clause (x) such
Parity Stock or Junior Stock, as the case may be, does not rank
senior to the Series A Preferred Stock as to dividend
rights or rights upon liquidation,
winding-up
or dissolution of the Corporation; provided further, that the
consent of the Holders shall not be needed to authorize,
increase the authorized amount of, or issue Parity Stock whether
or not the dividends are cumulative.
FOURTH:
Section 4 of the Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is
hereby amended by deleting in its entirety paragraph number 2
under the heading CLASS I: PREFERRED STOCK.
FIFTH:
The foregoing amendment was duly
adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
SIXTH:
The foregoing amendment shall be
effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware.
D-1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate
of Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer, this
[ ] day of
[ ],
2009.
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
Name:
Title:
D-2
ANNEX E
DIRECTOR AMENDMENT
FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
The undersigned officer of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc., a
corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
Corporation), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:
FIRST:
The name of the Corporation is Midwest
Banc Holdings, Inc.
SECOND:
Section 5, subsections (c)
and (d) of the certificate of designation of the
Series A Noncumulative Redeemable Convertible Perpetual
Preferred Stock of the Corporation are hereby deleted in their
entirety.
THIRD:
The foregoing amendment was duly
adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
FOURTH:
The foregoing amendment shall be
effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State
of Delaware.
E-1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate
of Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized officer, this
[ ] day of
[ ],
2009.
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
Name:
Title:
E-2
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AT AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
F-1
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
(In thousands, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
32,278
|
|
|
$
|
61,330
|
|
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
|
|
|
295,162
|
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
327,440
|
|
|
|
63,065
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
(securities pledged to creditors: $480,614 at September 30,
2009 and $482,224 at December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
621,949
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
(fair value: $30,387 at December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
652,216
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
31,698
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
2,454,101
|
|
|
|
2,509,759
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(83,506
|
)
|
|
|
(44,432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
2,370,595
|
|
|
|
2,465,327
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,675
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
40,589
|
|
|
|
38,313
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
20,980
|
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
14,683
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
49,505
|
|
|
|
129,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
3,570,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
330,901
|
|
|
$
|
334,495
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
2,224,288
|
|
|
|
2,078,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
2,555,189
|
|
|
|
2,412,791
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
777,078
|
|
|
|
817,041
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
31,624
|
|
|
|
34,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,363,891
|
|
|
|
3,264,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized; Series A, $2,500 liquidation preference,
17,250 shares issued and outstanding at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008; Series T, $1,000
liquidation preference, 84,784 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 64,000,000 shares
authorized; 29,847,092 shares issued and 28,116,312
outstanding at September 30, 2009 and
29,530,878 shares issued and 27,892,578 outstanding at
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
385,219
|
|
|
|
383,491
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(191,726
|
)
|
|
|
(66,325
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(4,032
|
)
|
|
|
(2,122
|
)
|
Treasury stock, at cost (1,730,780 shares at
September 30, 2009 and 1,638,300 shares at
December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
305,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,544,130
|
|
|
$
|
3,570,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-2
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
33,294
|
|
|
$
|
37,364
|
|
|
$
|
103,191
|
|
|
$
|
115,562
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
7,739
|
|
|
|
13,091
|
|
|
|
25,776
|
|
Exempt from federal income taxes
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
Dividends from Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
551
|
|
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
35,135
|
|
|
|
45,888
|
|
|
|
118,063
|
|
|
|
143,927
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
11,385
|
|
|
|
15,301
|
|
|
|
37,280
|
|
|
|
50,501
|
|
Federal funds purchased and FRB discount window advances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
9,698
|
|
|
|
9,998
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
3,065
|
|
|
|
2,779
|
|
|
|
9,129
|
|
|
|
8,698
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
1,851
|
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
19,193
|
|
|
|
23,735
|
|
|
|
59,964
|
|
|
|
76,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
15,942
|
|
|
|
22,153
|
|
|
|
58,099
|
|
|
|
67,134
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
37,450
|
|
|
|
42,200
|
|
|
|
71,453
|
|
|
|
52,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(21,508
|
)
|
|
|
(20,047
|
)
|
|
|
(13,354
|
)
|
|
|
14,767
|
|
Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
1,918
|
|
|
|
5,860
|
|
|
|
5,834
|
|
Net gains (losses) on securities transactions
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
(16,652
|
)
|
|
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
(16,596
|
)
|
Impairment loss on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,801
|
)
|
|
|
(740
|
)
|
|
|
(65,387
|
)
|
Losses on sales of loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
Insurance and brokerage commissions
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
Trust fees
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
911
|
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
Gain on sale of property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,196
|
|
Other
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income (loss)
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
|
|
(60,512
|
)
|
|
|
14,295
|
|
|
|
(54,328
|
)
|
Noninterest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
8,948
|
|
|
|
12,515
|
|
|
|
31,890
|
|
|
|
36,570
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
3,175
|
|
|
|
3,211
|
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
|
|
9,203
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
2,838
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
6,830
|
|
|
|
5,350
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,121
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
3,098
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
Merger related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
FDIC insurance
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
5,986
|
|
|
|
2,099
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
|
|
7,056
|
|
|
|
7,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
22,450
|
|
|
|
103,046
|
|
|
|
68,378
|
|
|
|
151,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(40,301
|
)
|
|
|
(183,605
|
)
|
|
|
(67,437
|
)
|
|
|
(191,232
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
(23,891
|
)
|
|
|
55,617
|
|
|
|
(28,530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(41,267
|
)
|
|
|
(159,714
|
)
|
|
|
(123,054
|
)
|
|
|
(162,702
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends and premium accretion
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
2,506
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(42,556
|
)
|
|
$
|
(160,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(1.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(1.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-3
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
|
$
|
300,762
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
102,762
|
|
|
$
|
(13,917
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
$
|
375,164
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($145.3125 per share) on Series A
preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,506
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.26 per share) on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,404
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of 16,500 stock options,
net of tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Issuance of 226,324 shares restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162,702
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162,702
|
)
|
Prior service cost, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
Net increase in fair value of securities classified as
available-
for-sale,
net of income taxes and reclassification adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160,478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
303,221
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(69,850
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,693
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
$
|
207,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
|
$
|
383,491
|
|
|
$
|
5,229
|
|
|
$
|
(66,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
$
|
305,834
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($48.4375 per share) on Series A
preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared ($9.72 per share) on Series T
preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
Issuance of 19,965 shares of common stock to employee stock
purchase plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Issuance of 166,568 shares of common stock to
directors deferred compensation plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Issuance of 334,882 shares of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accreted discount on Series T preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
Repurchase of 10,695 shares of common stock under benefit
plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123,054
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123,054
|
)
|
Prior service cost including income taxes adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
Income taxes adjustment on decrease in value of projected
benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
Net decrease in fair value of securities classified as
available-
for-sale
including income taxes adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124,964
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
385,219
|
|
|
$
|
5,229
|
|
|
$
|
(191,726
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,032
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
$
|
180,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-4
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(123,054
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162,702
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities
Depreciation
|
|
|
3,096
|
|
|
|
3,107
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
69,700
|
|
|
|
51,765
|
|
Amortization of core deposit and other intangibles
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities, net
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
Realized (gain) loss on sale of securities, net
|
|
|
(4,637
|
)
|
|
|
16,596
|
|
Impairment loss on securities
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
65,387
|
|
Net loss on sales of loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Gain on sale of property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,196
|
)
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,121
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
(1,332
|
)
|
|
|
(2,634
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
48,706
|
|
|
|
(14,259
|
)
|
Loss on disposition of foreclosed properties, net
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
Valuation loss on foreclosed properties
|
|
|
2,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred stock based compensation
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
Change in other assets
|
|
|
29,517
|
|
|
|
(16,774
|
)
|
Change in other liabilities
|
|
|
(2,471
|
)
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
25,433
|
|
|
|
15,616
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
573,741
|
|
|
|
108,770
|
|
Sales of securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
27,856
|
|
|
|
4,443
|
|
Redemption of Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank
stock
|
|
|
4,046
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Maturities of securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
1,007,865
|
|
|
|
107,585
|
|
Principal payments on securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
49,537
|
|
|
|
42,496
|
|
Principal payments on securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
2,430
|
|
Purchases of securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
(1,621,933
|
)
|
|
|
(244,043
|
)
|
Purchases of Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,535
|
)
|
Loan originations and principal collections, net
|
|
|
11,698
|
|
|
|
(68,969
|
)
|
Sale of mortgage loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,789
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,259
|
|
Proceeds from disposition of foreclosed properties
|
|
|
1,989
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Liquidation of bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
86,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(5,372
|
)
|
|
|
(2,694
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
137,903
|
|
|
|
(29,225
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
|
142,587
|
|
|
|
55,185
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234,600
|
|
Repayments on borrowings
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
|
|
(167,075
|
)
|
Preferred cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(1,660
|
)
|
|
|
(2,506
|
)
|
Common cash dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,076
|
)
|
Change in federal funds purchased, FRB discount window advances,
and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66,750
|
)
|
Repurchase of common stock under stock and incentive plan
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common under stock and incentive plan
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
101,039
|
|
|
|
42,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
264,375
|
|
|
|
28,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
63,065
|
|
|
|
84,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
327,440
|
|
|
$
|
113,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
61,237
|
|
|
$
|
78,685
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-5
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
NOTE 1
|
BASIS OF
PRESENTATION
|
The consolidated financial statements of Midwest Banc Holdings,
Inc. (the Company) included herein are unaudited;
however, such statements reflect all adjustments (consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion
of management, necessary for a fair presentation for the interim
periods. The financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America for interim financial information and
with the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
The annualized results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the
results expected for the full year ending December 31,
2009. Certain items in the prior year financial statements were
reclassified to conform to the current years presentation.
Such reclassifications had no effect on net income.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
FORBEARANCE
AGREEMENT
|
The Companys credit agreements with a correspondent bank
at September 30, 2009 included a revolving line of credit
and term note. The Company was in violation of the financial
covenants contained in the revolving line of credit and term
note. The Company also did not make a required principal payment
on the term note due on July 1, 2009 and did not pay all of
the aggregate outstanding principal on the revolving line of
credit that matured July 3, 2009. On July 8, 2009, the
lender advised the Company that the non-compliance and failure
to make the principal payments constitute events of default. See
Note 15 Credit Agreements.
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance
agreement (Forbearance Agreement) with its lender
that provides for a forbearance period through March 31,
2010, during which time the Company will continue to pursue
completion of its previously disclosed capital plan. Management
believes that the Forbearance Agreement provides the Company
sufficient time to complete all major elements of the capital
plan; however there can be no assurance that any or all major
elements of the capital plan will be completed in a timely
manner or at all. During the forbearance period, the Company is
not obligated to make interest and principal payments in excess
of funds held in a deposit security account (which will be
funded with $325,000), and while retaining all rights and
remedies under the credit agreements, the lender has agreed not
to demand payment of amounts due or begin foreclosure
proceedings in respect of the collateral, which consists
primarily of all the stock of the Companys principal
subsidiary, Midwest Bank and Trust Company, and has agreed
to forbear from exercising the rights and remedies available to
it in respect of existing defaults and future compliance with
certain covenants through March 31, 2010. As part of the
Forbearance Agreement, the Company entered into a tax refund
security agreement under which it agreed to deliver to the
lender the expected proceeds to be received in connection with
an outstanding Federal income tax refund in the approximate
amount of $2.1 million. These proceeds, when received, will
be placed in the deposit security account, and will be available
for interest and principal payments. The Forbearance Agreement
may terminate prior to March 31, 2010 if the Company
defaults under any of its representations, warranties or
obligations contained in either the Forbearance Agreement or
credit agreements, or the Bank becomes subject to receivership
by the FDIC or the Company becomes subject to other bankruptcy
or insolvency type proceeding.
Upon the expiration of the forbearance period, the principal and
interest payments that were due under the revolving line of
credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers,
at the time the Forbearance Agreement was entered into will once
again become due and payable, along with such other amounts as
may have become due during the forbearance period. Absent
successful completion of all or a significant portion of the
Capital Plan, the Company expects that it would not be able to
meet any demands for payment of amounts then due at the
expiration of the forbearance period. If the Company is unable
to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources of
financing on acceptable terms, it may have a material adverse
effect on the Companys business and results of operations.
F-6
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 3
|
REGULATORY
ACTIONS
|
The Banks primary regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago and the Illinois Department of Financial and
Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, have recently
completed a safety and soundness examination of the Bank. As a
result of that examination, the Company expects that the Federal
Reserve Bank and the Division of Banking will request that the
Bank enter into a formal supervisory action requiring it to take
certain steps intended to improve its overall condition. Such a
supervisory action could require the Bank, among other things,
to: implement the previously disclosed capital plan to
strengthen the Banks capital position; develop a plan to
improve the quality of the Banks loan portfolio by
charging off loans and reducing its position in assets
classified as substandard; develop and implement a
plan to enhance the Banks liquidity position; and enhance
the Banks loan underwriting and workout remediation teams.
The final supervisory action may contain other conditions and
targeted time frames as specified by the regulators.
The Company believes that the successful completion of all or a
significant portion of the Capital Plan will enable the Bank to
meet the requirements of any formal supervisory action with the
regulators and will ensure that the Bank is able to comply with
applicable bank regulations. However, the successful completion
of all or any portion of the capital plan is not assured and if
the Company or the Bank is unable to comply with the terms of
the anticipated supervisory action or any other applicable
regulations, the Company and the Bank could become subject to
additional, heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our
regulators were to take such additional actions, the Company and
the Bank could become subject to various requirements limiting
the ability to develop new business lines, mandating additional
capital,
and/or
requiring the sale of certain assets and liabilities. Failure of
the Company to meet these conditions could lead to further
enforcement action on behalf of the regulators. The terms of any
such additional regulatory actions, orders or agreements could
have a materially adverse effect on the business of the Bank and
the Company.
|
|
NOTE 4
|
NEW
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has
established the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification
tm
(Codification or ASC) as the single
source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be
applied by nongovernmental entities (ASC 105). Rules and
interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are
also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The
Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and
reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC
accounting literature not included in the Codification will
become non-authoritative. Following the Codification, the Board
will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB
Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts.
Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates
(ASU), which will serve to update the Codification,
provide background information about the guidance and provide
the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification.
GAAP is not intended to be changed as a result of the
FASBs Codification project, but it will change the way the
guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes
will have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP
in their financial statements and in their accounting policies
for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has
implemented the Codification in this quarterly report by
providing references to the Codification topics.
In December 2007, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance
for business combinations (ASC 805), which modifies the
accounting for business combinations and requires, with limited
exceptions, the acquirer in a business combination to recognize
all of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interests in the acquiree at the
acquisition-date, at fair value. This guidance also requires
certain contingent assets and liabilities acquired as well as
contingent consideration to be recognized at fair value. In
addition, this guidance requires payments to third parties for
consulting, legal, audit, and similar services associated with
an acquisition to be recognized as expenses when incurred rather
than capitalized as part of the cost of
F-7
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the acquisition. This guidance is effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and early adoption
is not permitted. The adoption of this guidance on
January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations or consolidated financial
position.
In June 2008, the FASB provided guidance for determining whether
an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is
indexed to an entitys own stock (ASC
815-40-15).
This guidance applies to any freestanding financial instrument
or embedded feature that has all of the characteristics of a
derivative or freestanding instrument that is potentially
settled in an entitys own stock (with the exception of
share-based payment awards within the scope of the authoritative
guidance for stock compensation (ASC 718)). To meet the
definition of indexed to own stock, an
instruments contingent exercise provisions must not be
based on (a) an observable market, other than the market
for the issuers stock (if applicable), or (b) an
observable index, other than an index calculated or measured
solely by reference to the issuers own operations, and the
variables that could affect the settlement amount must be inputs
to the fair value of a
fixed-for-fixed
forward or option on equity shares. This guidance is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and
interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this
guidance on January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect
on the Companys results of operations or consolidated
financial position.
On June 16, 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance
for determining whether instruments granted in share-based
payment transactions are participating securities (ASC 260).
This guidance addresses whether instruments granted in
share-based payment transactions are participating securities
prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the
earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the
two-class method. This guidance is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Accordingly, the Company adopted the provisions of this
guidance effective January 1, 2009 and computed earnings
per share using the two-class method for all periods presented.
Upon adoption, the Company retrospectively adjusted earnings per
share data to conform to the provisions in this guidance.
In December 2008, the FASB amended the authoritative guidance
regarding disclosures by public entities about transfers of
financial assets (ASC 860) and interests in variable
interest entities (ASC 810), which requires additional
disclosures about transfers of financial assets and the
involvement with variable interest entities. These additional
disclosures are intended to provide greater transparency about a
transferors continuing involvement with transferred assets
and variable interest entities. This guidance is effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The adoption
of this guidance on January 1, 2009 did not have a material
effect on the Companys results of operations or
consolidated financial position.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB amended the authoritative
guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures (ASC 820),
which requires increased analysis and management judgment to
estimate fair value if an entity determines that either the
volume
and/or
level
of activity for an asset or liability has significantly
decreased or price quotations or observable inputs are not
associated with orderly transactions. Valuation techniques such
as an income approach might be appropriate to supplement or
replace a market approach in those circumstances. This guidance
requires entities to disclose in interim and annual periods the
inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value along
with any changes in valuation techniques and related inputs
during the period. This guidance is effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Accordingly, the
Company included these new disclosures beginning April 1,
2009. See Note 10 Fair Value for more
information.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB amended the authoritative
guidance for interim disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments (ASC 825), which relates to fair value disclosures
in public entity financial statements for financial instruments.
This guidance increases the frequency of fair value disclosures
from annual only to quarterly. This guidance is effective for
interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations or consolidated financial
F-8
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
position, but enhanced required disclosures. Accordingly, the
Company included these new disclosures beginning April 1,
2009. See Note 10 Fair Value for more
information.
On April 9, 2009, the FASB issued new authoritative
guidance that revises the recognition and reporting requirements
for
other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities (ASC 320). This guidance
eliminates the ability and intent to hold provision
for debt securities and impairment is considered to be other
than temporary if a company (i) intends to sell the
security, (ii) more likely than not will be required to
sell the security before recovering its cost, or (iii) does
not expect to recover the securitys entire amortized cost.
This guidance also eliminates the probability
standard relating to the collectibility of cash flows and
impairment is considered to be other than temporary if the
present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less
than the amortized cost (credit loss).
Other-than-temporary
losses also need to be separated between the amount related to
credit loss (which is recognized in current earnings) and the
amount related to all other factors (which is recognized in
other comprehensive income). This guidance is effective for
interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
adoption of this guidance on April 1, 2009 did not have a
material effect on the Companys results of operations or
consolidated financial position.
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance establishing
principles and requirements for subsequent events (ASC 855).
This guidance establishes general standards of accounting for
and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date
but before financial statements are issued or are available to
be issued. This guidance is based on the same principles as
those that currently exist in the auditing standards. An entity
must disclose the date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated and whether that date is the date the financial
statements were issued or available to be issued. This guidance
also requires disclosure of subsequent events to keep the
financial statements from being misleading. This guidance is
effective for interim or annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance on
June 30, 2009 did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations or consolidated financial
position.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment
of FASB Statement No. 140. This guidance eliminates
the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, introduces
the concept of a participating interest, which will
limit the circumstances where the transfer of a portion of a
financial asset will qualify as a sale, assuming all other
derecognition criteria are met, it clarifies and amends the
derecognition criteria for determining whether a transfer
qualifies for sale accounting, and requires additional
disclosures. The Company does not believe that the adoption of
SFAS No. 166 on January 1, 2010 will have a
material effect on the Companys results of operations or
consolidated financial position. This authoritative guidance has
not yet been incorporated within the FASBs Codification.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),
which eliminates the quantitative approach previously required
for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest
entity. If an enterprise is required to consolidate an entity as
a result of the initial application of this standard, it should
describe the transition method(s) applied and shall disclose the
amount and classification in its statement of financial position
of the consolidated assets or liabilities by the transition
method(s) applied. If an enterprise is required to deconsolidate
an entity as a result of the initial application of this
standard, it should disclose the amount of any cumulative effect
adjustment related to deconsolidation separately from any
cumulative effect adjustment related to consolidation of
entities. The Company does not believe that the adoption of
SFAS No. 167 on January 1, 2010 will have a
material effect on the Companys results of operations or
consolidated financial position. This authoritative guidance has
not yet been incorporated within the FASBs Codification.
F-9
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The amortized cost and fair value of securities
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
451,785
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
451,792
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential(1)
|
|
|
147,043
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
147,003
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities residential(2)
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities(3)
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
14,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,115
|
)
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
618,551
|
|
|
$
|
1,809
|
|
|
$
|
(4,817
|
)
|
|
$
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of the Government National Mortgage
Association (GNMA).
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes obligations of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (FHLMC).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes issues from Federal National Mortgage Association
(FNMA) and FHLMC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury and U.S. government-sponsored
entities(1)
|
|
$
|
263,483
|
|
|
$
|
1,952
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
265,435
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
57,309
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
56,664
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities(1)(2)
|
|
|
281,592
|
|
|
|
3,363
|
|
|
|
(1,276
|
)
|
|
|
283,679
|
|
Equity securities(3)
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,819
|
)
|
|
|
930
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
19,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,935
|
)
|
|
|
15,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
624,309
|
|
|
$
|
5,556
|
|
|
$
|
(7,916
|
)
|
|
$
|
621,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
1,251
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,263
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities(1)(2)
|
|
|
29,016
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
29,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
30,267
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of the FHLMC and FNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
F-10
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company repositioned its
securities portfolio to lower capital requirements associated
with higher risk-weighted assets, restructure expected cash
flows, reduce credit risk, and enhance the Banks asset
sensitivity. The Company sold $538.1 million of its
securities portfolio with an average yield of 3.94% and average
life of slightly over two years, including $27.7 million of
securities classified as
held-to-maturity.
The securities sold consisted of U.S. government-sponsored
entities debentures, mortgage-backed securities, and municipal
bonds. These securities were sold in the open market at a net
gain of $4.3 million; $117,000 of this gain was related to
securities classified as
held-to-maturity.
The Company purchased $571.0 million of U.S. Treasury
bills and Government National Mortgage Association
mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on these
securities is 0.43% with an average life of less than six months.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company still held
$27.6 million in five securities, including municipal bonds
and U.S. government-sponsored entities mortgage-backed
securities, that were identified for sale under this portfolio
repositioning program. Consistent with that program and the
Companys stated intent to sell these securities, the
Company recognized a $740,000
other-than-temporary
impairment charge on June 30, 2009. As of
September 30, 2009, the Company continued to hold two of
the five securities with balances totaling $2.0 million,
which included a municipal bond and a mortgage-backed security
of a U.S. government-sponsored entity that were identified
for sale under this portfolio repositioning program, which were
not impaired as of that date.
The following is a summary of the fair value of securities
held-to-maturity
and
available-for-sale
with unrealized losses and an aging of those unrealized losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
49,997
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
49,997
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential(1)
|
|
|
51,656
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,656
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities(2)
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
(4,115
|
)
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
(4,115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
102,484
|
|
|
|
(702
|
)
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
(4,115
|
)
|
|
|
113,348
|
|
|
|
(4,817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
102,484
|
|
|
$
|
(702
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,864
|
|
|
$
|
(4,115
|
)
|
|
$
|
113,348
|
|
|
$
|
(4,817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
F-11
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
34,293
|
|
|
$
|
(886
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,293
|
|
|
$
|
(886
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities U.S. government-sponsored entities(1)
|
|
|
60,117
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
39,778
|
|
|
|
(1,078
|
)
|
|
|
99,895
|
|
|
|
(1,276
|
)
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities(2)
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
(1,819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
(1,819
|
)
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
3,746
|
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
11,495
|
|
|
|
(3,648
|
)
|
|
|
15,241
|
|
|
|
(3,935
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
99,055
|
|
|
|
(3,190
|
)
|
|
|
51,273
|
|
|
|
(4,726
|
)
|
|
|
150,328
|
|
|
|
(7,916
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities U.S. government-sponsored entities(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,521
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
20,521
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,521
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
20,771
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
99,305
|
|
|
$
|
(3,190
|
)
|
|
$
|
71,794
|
|
|
$
|
(4,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
171,099
|
|
|
$
|
(7,946
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
The unrealized loss on
available-for-sale
securities is included in other comprehensive loss on the
consolidated balance sheets. Management has concluded that no
individual unrealized loss as of September 30, 2009,
identified in the preceding table, represents
other-than-temporary
impairment. The Company does not intend to sell nor would it be
required to sell the securities shown in the table with
unrealized losses before recovering their amortized cost.
F-12
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Major classifications of loans (source of repayment basis) are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
1,045,533
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,090,078
|
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
324,074
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
366,178
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
744,464
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
729,729
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
227,966
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
194,673
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
5,583
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
107,124
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
123,161
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross
|
|
|
2,454,744
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,510,151
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
$
|
2,454,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,509,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 7
|
ALLOWANCE
FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
Following is a summary of activity in the allowance for loan
losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
63,893
|
|
|
$
|
22,606
|
|
|
$
|
44,432
|
|
|
$
|
26,748
|
|
Provision charged to operations
|
|
|
36,700
|
|
|
|
41,950
|
|
|
|
69,700
|
|
|
|
51,765
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(17,723
|
)
|
|
|
(25,224
|
)
|
|
|
(32,268
|
)
|
|
|
(40,472
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
1,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off
|
|
|
(17,087
|
)
|
|
|
(25,128
|
)
|
|
|
(30,626
|
)
|
|
|
(39,085
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at end of period
|
|
$
|
83,506
|
|
|
$
|
39,428
|
|
|
$
|
83,506
|
|
|
$
|
39,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for credit losses reflected on the consolidated
statements of operations includes the provision for loan losses
and the provision for unfunded commitment losses as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
$
|
36,700
|
|
|
$
|
41,950
|
|
|
$
|
69,700
|
|
|
$
|
51,765
|
|
Provision for unfunded commitment losses
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
$
|
37,450
|
|
|
$
|
42,200
|
|
|
$
|
71,453
|
|
|
$
|
52,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to
impaired loans. Information with respect to impaired loans and
the amount of the allowance for loan losses allocated thereto is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Impaired loans for which no allowance for loan losses is
allocated
|
|
$
|
52,519
|
|
Impaired loans with an allocation of the allowance for loan
losses
|
|
|
139,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
191,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses allocated to impaired loans
|
|
$
|
38,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
Average impaired loans
|
|
$
|
103,051
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8
|
GOODWILL
AND INTANGIBLES
|
The following table presents the carrying amount and accumulated
amortization of intangible assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit and other intangibles
|
|
$
|
21,091
|
|
|
$
|
(8,127
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,964
|
|
|
$
|
21,091
|
|
|
$
|
(6,408
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,683
|
|
The amortization of intangible assets was $573,000 and
$1.7 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively. At September 30,
2009, the projected amortization of intangible assets for the
years ending December 31, 2009 through 2013 and thereafter
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
2,292
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,918
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,752
|
|
The weighted average remaining amortization period for the core
deposit intangibles is approximately seven years as of
September 30, 2009.
The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount
of goodwill and other intangibles during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
78,862
|
|
|
$
|
14,683
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
78,862
|
|
|
$
|
12,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Consistent with established policy, an annual review for
goodwill impairment as of September 30, 2009 was conducted
with the assistance of a nationally recognized third party
valuation specialist. Based upon that review, the Company
determined that the $78.9 million goodwill recorded on the
September 30, 2009 balance sheet was not impaired.
|
|
NOTE 9
|
OFF-BALANCE-SHEET
RISK
|
The Company is a party to financial instruments with
off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet
financing needs of customers. Since many commitments to extend
credit expire without being used, the amounts below do not
necessarily represent future cash commitments. These financial
instruments include lines of credit, letters of credit, and
commitments to extend credit. These are summarized as follows as
of September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Lines of Credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
81,610
|
|
|
$
|
5,632
|
|
|
$
|
5,238
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,480
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
31,528
|
|
|
|
23,031
|
|
|
|
27,983
|
|
|
|
31,051
|
|
|
|
113,593
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
207,627
|
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
2,655
|
|
|
|
4,740
|
|
|
|
218,038
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
43,836
|
|
|
|
3,220
|
|
|
|
2,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,884
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
12,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commitments
|
|
$
|
377,523
|
|
|
$
|
34,899
|
|
|
$
|
38,704
|
|
|
$
|
37,777
|
|
|
$
|
488,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, commitments to extend credit
included $12.9 million of fixed rate loan commitments.
These commitments are due to expire within 30 to 90 days of
issuance and have rates ranging from 6.25% to 7.25%.
Substantially all of the unused lines of credit are at
adjustable rates of interest.
The Company had a reserve for losses on unfunded commitments of
$2.1 million at September 30, 2009, up from
$1.1 million at December 31, 2008 and $793,000 at
September 30, 2008.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company began deferring
payment of dividends on the $84.8 million of Series T
cumulative preferred stock and deferring interest payments on
$60.8 million of its junior subordinated debentures as
permitted by the terms of such debentures. The deferred interest
payments on the Companys junior subordinated debentures
are accrued in the period in which the payments would have been
made which were $1.1 million through September 30,
2009.. The dividends on the Series T cumulative preferred
stock are recorded only when declared. The cumulative amount of
dividends not declared was $2.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009.
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in
various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, any
liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial position
or results of operations.
The Company adopted the authoritative guidance for fair value
measurement (ASC 820) on January 1, 2008. This
guidance defines fair value as the exchange price that would be
received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit
price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the
asset or liability in an orderly transaction between willing
market participants on the measurement date. This guidance also
establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to
maximize the use of observable inputs and
F-15
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair
value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be
used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the
entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
|
|
|
|
Level 2:
Significant other observable
inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are
not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
|
|
Level 3:
Significant unobservable inputs
that reflect a companys own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an
asset or liability.
|
The Companys
available-for-sale
investment securities are the only financial assets that are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis; it does not hold
any financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a
recurring basis. The fair values of
available-for-sale
securities are determined by obtaining either quoted prices on
nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing,
which is a mathematical technique widely used to value debt
securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the
specific securities but rather by relying on these
securities relationship to other benchmark quoted
securities. If quoted prices or matrix pricing are not
available, the fair value is determined by an adjusted price for
similar securities including unobservable inputs.
The fair values of the
available-for-sale
securities were measured at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 using the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices or
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets in
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
451,792
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
451,792
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential(1)
|
|
|
147,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities residential(2)
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities(3)
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,538
|
|
|
|
7,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
615,543
|
|
|
$
|
3,871
|
|
|
$
|
604,346
|
|
|
$
|
7,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and of U.S.
government-sponsored entities(4)
|
|
$
|
265,435
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
265,435
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
56,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities(1)(4)
|
|
|
283,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities(3)
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
15,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,808
|
|
|
|
8,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
621,949
|
|
|
$
|
930
|
|
|
$
|
612,586
|
|
|
$
|
8,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes obligations of FHLMC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes obligations of FHLMC and FNMA.
|
The following is a summary of changes in the fair value of other
bonds that were measured using significant unobservable inputs
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
8,881
|
|
|
$
|
9,286
|
|
|
$
|
8,433
|
|
|
$
|
10,479
|
|
Paydowns received
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(1,483
|
)
|
|
|
(6,436
|
)
|
|
|
(940
|
)
|
|
|
(7,629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
7,326
|
|
|
$
|
2,850
|
|
|
$
|
7,326
|
|
|
$
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain of the Companys impaired loans are measured using
the fair value of the underlying collateral on a non-recurring
basis. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired,
management measures impairment in accordance with the
authoritative guidance for loan impairments (ASC
310-10-35).
At September 30, 2009, $139.1 million of the loans
considered impaired were evaluated based on the fair value of
the collateral compared to $41.3 million at
December 31, 2008. The fair value of the collateral is
determined by obtaining an observable market price or by
obtaining an appraised value with management applying selling
and other discounts to the underlying collateral value. If a
current appraised value is not available, the fair value of the
impaired loan is determined by an adjusted appraised value
including unobservable cash flows.
The fair values of the impaired loans based on the fair value of
the collateral were measured at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 using the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices or
|
|
Significant
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets in
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Assets at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
100,362
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,362
|
|
Assets at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
37,098
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,098
|
|
Loans which are measured for impairment using the fair value of
collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a gross carrying
amount of $139.1 million, with an associated valuation
allowance of $38.8 million for a fair value of
$100.4 million at September 30, 2009. At
December 31, 2008, loans measured for impairment using the
fair value of collateral had a carrying amount of
$41.3 million, with an associated valuation allowance of
$4.2 million for a fair value of $37.1 million. The
provision for loan losses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, included $48.7 million of specific
allowance allocations for impaired loans.
The methods and assumptions used to determine fair values for
each class of financial instrument are presented below.
F-17
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial
instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
327,440
|
|
|
$
|
327,440
|
|
|
$
|
63,065
|
|
|
$
|
63,065
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
615,543
|
|
|
|
621,949
|
|
|
|
621,949
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
|
|
30,387
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
31,698
|
|
|
|
31,698
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
2,370,595
|
|
|
|
2,283,820
|
|
|
|
2,465,327
|
|
|
|
2,485,011
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
9,506
|
|
|
|
9,506
|
|
|
|
13,302
|
|
|
|
13,302
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
|
330,901
|
|
|
|
330,901
|
|
|
|
334,495
|
|
|
|
334,495
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
2,224,288
|
|
|
|
2,238,968
|
|
|
|
2,078,296
|
|
|
|
2,008,100
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
8,357
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
334,776
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
369,376
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
371,126
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
|
|
410,992
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
26,510
|
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
|
|
56,572
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
9,904
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
53,007
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
7,128
|
|
|
|
7,128
|
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
The remaining other assets and liabilities of the Company are
not considered financial instruments and are not included in the
above disclosures. The fair value adjustment of
off-balance-sheet items including loan commitments was not
considered material due to their short-term nature and variable
rates of interest.
The methods and assumptions used to determine fair values for
each class of financial instrument are presented below.
A test for goodwill impairment was conducted as of
September 30, 2009 with the assistance of a nationally
recognized third party valuation specialist. In Step 2 of that
test, the Company estimated the fair value of assets and
liabilities in the same manner as if a purchase of the reporting
unit was taking place from a market participant perspective.
Management worked closely with the third party valuation
specialist throughout the valuation process, provided necessary
information and reviewed and approved the methodologies,
assumptions and conclusions.
The fair value estimation methodology selected for our most
significant assets and liabilities was based on our observations
and knowledge of methodologies typically and currently utilized
by market participants, the structure and characteristics of the
asset and liability in terms of cash flows and collateral, and
the availability and reliability of significant inputs required
for a selected methodology and comparative data to evaluate the
outcomes.
The carrying amount is equivalent to the estimated fair value
for cash and cash equivalents, Federal Reserve Bank and Federal
Home Loan Bank stock, and accrued interest receivable and
payable. The fair values of securities are determined by
obtaining either quoted prices on nationally recognized
securities exchanges or matrix pricing. The Company selected the
income approach for performing loans, retail
F-18
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
certificates of deposit and borrowings. The Company estimated
discounted fair values separately for nonaccrual loans and loans
60-89 days
past due. The income approach was deemed appropriate for the
assets and liabilities noted above due to the limited current
comparable market transaction data available.
Net loans were $2.4 billion or 67% of Company assets as of
September 30, 2009. The estimated fair value of net loans
was $86.8 million or 3.7% below book value. In computing
this estimated fair value, performing loans were broken into
fixed and variable components, floors and collateral coverage
ratios were considered, and appropriate comparable market
discount rates were used to compute fair values using a
discounted cash flow approach. A 40% discount was applied to
nonaccrual loans based upon recent Company charge-off experience
and a 10% discount was applied to loans
60-89 days
past due.
There is no readily available market for a significant portion
of the Companys financial instruments. Accordingly, fair
values are based on various factors relative to expected loss
experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics,
and other factors. The assumptions and estimates used in the
fair value determination process are subjective in nature and
involve uncertainties and significant judgment and, therefore,
fair values cannot be determined with precision. Changes in
assumptions could significantly affect these estimated values.
Further discussion of material assumptions used in the fair
value estimates and the effect of certain changes in material
assumptions on those values is included in
Note 8 Goodwill and Intangibles.
|
|
NOTE 11
|
STOCK
COMPENSATION AND RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
|
Under the Companys Stock and Incentive Plan (the
Plan), officers, directors, and key employees may be
granted incentive stock options to purchase the Companys
common stock at no less than 100% of the market price on the
date the option is granted. Options can be granted to become
exercisable immediately or after a specified vesting period or
may be issued subject to performance targets. In all cases, the
options have a maximum term of ten years. The Plan also permits
the issuance of nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock, and restricted stock units. The Plan
authorizes a total of 3,900,000 shares for issuance. There
are 1,636,778 shares remaining for issuance under the Plan
at September 30, 2009. It is the Companys policy to
issue new shares of its common stock in conjunction with the
exercise of stock options or grants of restricted stock.
No employee stock options were exercised during the first nine
months of 2009. Total employee stock options outstanding at
September 30, 2009 were 548,581 with exercise prices
ranging between $1.15 and $22.03, with a weighted average
exercise price of $8.11, and expiration dates between 2010 and
2019. During the first nine months of 2009, 288,693 stock
options were granted with an exercise price of $1.15, which will
vest over a three-year service period.
Information about option grants follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Value Per Share
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
379,371
|
|
|
$
|
14.28
|
|
|
$
|
4.80
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
288,693
|
|
|
|
1.15
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(119,483
|
)
|
|
|
10.88
|
|
|
|
3.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
548,581
|
|
|
|
8.11
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Employee compensation expense for stock options previously
granted was recorded in the consolidated statement of operations
based on the grants vesting schedule. Forfeitures of stock
option grants are estimated for those stock options where the
requisite service is not expected to be rendered. The grant-date
fair value for each grant was calculated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. The following table reflects the
assumptions used to determine the grant-date fair value stock
options granted in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.78
|
%
|
Expected option life
|
|
|
7.5 years
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
52.54
|
%
|
Employee compensation expense related to stock options was
$14,000 and $42,000 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to $5,000 and
$16,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, respectively. The total compensation cost related to
nonvested stock options not yet recognized was $132,000 at
September 30, 2009 and the weighted average period over
which this cost is expected to be recognized is 28 months.
Under the Plan, officers, directors, and key employees may also
be granted awards of restricted shares of the Companys
common stock. Holders of restricted shares are entitled to
receive non-forfeitable cash dividends paid to the
Companys common stockholders and have the right to vote
the restricted shares prior to vesting. The existing restricted
share grants vest over various time periods not exceeding five
years and some may be accelerated subject to achieving certain
performance targets. Compensation expense for the restricted
shares equals the market price of the related stock at the date
of grant and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
expected vesting period. All restricted shares had a grant-date
fair value equal to the market price of the underlying common
stock at date of grant.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the
Company recognized $156,000 and $876,000 in compensation expense
related to the restricted stock grants compared to $688,000 and
$2.3 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively. The total compensation
cost related to nonvested restricted shares not yet recognized
was $1.4 million at September 30, 2009 and the
weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be
recognized is 32 months.
Information about restricted shares outstanding and activity
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
609,901
|
|
|
$
|
16.42
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
334,882
|
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(47,896
|
)
|
|
|
15.80
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(210,951
|
)
|
|
|
17.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
685,936
|
|
|
|
8.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 12
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
|
The Company and various members of senior management have
entered into a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(SERP). The SERP is an unfunded plan that provides
for guaranteed payments, based on a percentage of the
individuals final salary, for 15 years after
age 65. The benefit amount is reduced if the individual
retires prior to age 65.
Effective April 1, 2008, the SERP agreements with employees
constituted a pension plan under the authoritative guidance for
compensation retirement plans (ASC 715). The
objective of this guidance is to recognize the compensation cost
of pension benefits (including prior service cost) over that
employees approximate service period. Included in salaries
and benefits expense in the statements of income was $319,000
and $956,000 of expense related to the SERP for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively,
compared to $310,000 and $1.3 million, for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The
expense related to the SERP for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 of $742,000 was calculated under the
authoritative guidance for deferred compensation arrangements
(ASC 710). The prior service cost amortization expense was
$71,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The
benefit obligation was $7.2 million and $6.4 million
as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
The following is a summary of changes in the benefit obligation
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
6,403
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
618
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
267
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
7,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The difference between the provision for income taxes in the
consolidated financial statements and amounts computed by
applying the current federal statutory income tax rate of 35% to
income before income taxes is reconciled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes computed at the statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(14,105
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(64,262
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(23,603
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(66,931
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Tax-exempt interest income on securities and loans
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(617
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
General business credits
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit due to state
operating loss
|
|
|
(2,388
|
)
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
(2,137
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(2,607
|
)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
(2,898
|
)
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Life insurance cash surrender value increase, net of premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(922
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Liquidation of bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,924
|
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received deduction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
17,397
|
|
|
|
(43.2
|
)
|
|
|
14,851
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
75,259
|
|
|
|
(111.7
|
)
|
|
|
14,851
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
Nondeductible costs and other, net
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(23,891
|
)
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
55,617
|
|
|
|
(82.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(28,530
|
)
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognizes interest related to unrecognized tax
benefits and penalties, if any, in income tax expense.
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a tax
expense of $966,000. This expense relates primarily to the
adjustment made to the net deferred tax asset as a result of the
reduced ability to use available tax planning strategies.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company liquidated its
$85.8 million investment in bank owned life insurance in
order to reduce the Companys investment risk and the
Banks regulatory capital requirement. The
$16.3 million increase in cash surrender value of the
policies since the time of purchase is treated as ordinary
income for tax purposes. Additionally, a 10% IRS excise tax was
incurred as a result of the liquidation. As a result, the
Company recorded federal tax expense of $6.9 million and an
additional state tax expense of $1.2 million in the second
quarter of 2009 for this transaction.
The Company increased the total valuation allowance by
$16.9 million to $76.9 million against its existing
net deferred tax assets during the quarter. The valuation
allowance includes $1.6 million recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive loss fully offsetting deferred taxes which
were established for securities available for sale and for the
SERP program. The Companys primary deferred tax assets
relate to its
F-22
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
allowance for loan losses, net operating losses
(NOLs) and impairment charges relating to FNMA
and FHLMC preferred stock holdings. Under generally accepted
accounting principles, a valuation allowance is required to be
recognized if it is more likely than not that such
deferred tax assets will not be realized. In making that
determination, management is required to evaluate both positive
and negative evidence including recent historical financial
performance, forecasts of future income, tax planning strategies
and assessments of the current and future economic and business
conditions. The Company performs and updates this evaluation on
a quarterly basis.
In conducting its regular quarterly evaluation, the Company made
a determination to maintain the valuation allowance as of
September 30, 2009 based primarily upon the existence of a
three year cumulative loss derived by combining the pre-tax
income (loss) reported during the two most recent annual periods
(calendar years ended 2007 and 2008) with managements
current projected results for the year ending 2009. This three
year cumulative loss position is primarily attributable to
significant provisions for loan losses incurred and currently
forecasted during the three years ending 2009 and losses
realized during 2008 on its FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock
holdings. The Companys current financial forecasts
indicate that taxable income will be generated in the future.
However, the existing deferred tax benefits may not be fully
realized due to statutory limitations on their utilization based
on the Companys planned capital restructuring. The
creation and subsequent addition to the valuation allowance,
although it increased tax expense for the second and third
quarters and similarly reduced tangible book values, did not
have an effect on the Companys cash flows. The remaining
net deferred tax assets of $4.1 million are supported by
available tax planning strategies.
An Illinois Department of Revenue audit has commenced for the
Company for the years 2006 and 2007. The Company has also been
notified that Royal American Corporation will be audited by the
IRS for the carryback of its separate company loss for 2006 to
2004. The Company is responsible for all taxes related to Royal
American including periods prior to its acquisition. The Company
does not anticipate any adjustments as a result of these audits
that would result in significant change to its financial
position. It is reasonably possible that the gross balance of
unrecognized tax benefits may change within the next twelve
months.
Years that remain subject to examination include 2006 to present
for federal, 2005 to present for Illinois, 2005 to present for
Indiana, and 2005 to present for federal and Illinois for
various acquired entities.
F-23
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 14
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(41,267
|
)
|
|
$
|
(159,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
(123,054
|
)
|
|
$
|
(162,702
|
)
|
Less: Series A preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
2,506
|
|
Series T preferred stock dividends(1)
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series T preferred stock discount accretion
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(42,556
|
)
|
|
$
|
(160,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
(165,208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
27,953
|
|
|
|
27,859
|
|
|
|
27,936
|
|
|
|
27,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(1.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
27,953
|
|
|
|
27,859
|
|
|
|
27,936
|
|
|
|
27,851
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of restricted stock(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average common shares
|
|
|
27,953
|
|
|
|
27,859
|
|
|
|
27,936
|
|
|
|
27,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(1.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.57
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes $824 in dividends declared in first quarter of 2009 and
$1,060 and $2,661 in cumulative dividends not declared for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
No adjustment for unvested restricted shares was included in the
computation of loss available to common stockholders for any
period there was a loss. See Note 4 New
Accounting Pronouncements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
No shares of stock options or restricted stock were included in
the computation of diluted earnings per share for any period
there was a loss.
|
Options to purchase 548,581 shares at $8.11 were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
421,322 shares at $14.10 were not included for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008 because the option
exercise prices were greater than the average market price of
the common stock and the options were, therefore, anti-dilutive.
The warrant to purchase 4,282,020 shares at an exercise
price of $2.97 was not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the warrants exercise price was
greater than the average market price of common stock and was,
therefore, anti-dilutive. A total of 685,936 shares of
restricted stock for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 615,637 shares of restricted
stock for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008 were not included in the computation of diluted shares
because of the anti-dilutive effect. The shares that would be
issued if the Series A noncumulative redeemable convertible
perpetual preferred stock were converted are not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 because of their
anti-dilutive effect.
F-24
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 15
|
CREDIT
AGREEMENTS
|
The Companys credit agreements with a correspondent bank
at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted
of a revolving line of credit, a term note, and a subordinated
debenture in the amounts of $8.6 million,
$55.0 million, and $15.0 million, respectively.
The revolving line of credit had a maximum availability of
$8.6 million, an outstanding balance of $8.6 million
as of September 30, 2009, an interest rate at
September 30, 2009 of one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis
points with an interest rate floor of 7.25%, and matured on
July 3, 2009. The term note had an interest rate of
one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis points at September 30,
2009 and matures on September 28, 2010. The subordinated
debt had an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 350 basis
points at September 30, 2009, matures on March 31,
2018, and qualifies as Tier 2 capital.
The revolving line of credit and term note included the
following financial covenants at September 30, 2009:
(1) Midwest Bank and Trust Company (the
Bank) must not have nonperforming loans (loans on
nonaccrual status and 90 days or more past due and
troubled-debt restructured loans) in excess of 3.00% of total
loans, (2) the Bank must report a quarterly profit,
excluding charges related to acquisitions, and (3) the Bank
must remain well capitalized. At September 30, 2009, the
Company was in violation of financial convenants (the
Financial Covenant Defaults).
The Company did not make a required $5.0 million principal
payment on the term note due on July 1, 2009 under the
covenant waiver for the third quarter of 2008. On July 8,
2009, the lender advised the Company that such non-compliance
constitutes a continuing event of default under the loan
agreements (the Contingent Waiver Default). The
Companys decision not to make the $5.0 million
principal payment, together with its previously announced
decision to suspend the dividend on its Series A preferred
stock and defer the dividends on its Series T preferred
stock and interest payments on its trust preferred securities,
were made in order to retain cash and preserve liquidity and
capital at the holding company.
The revolving line of credit matured on July 3, 2009, and
the Company did not pay to the lender all of the aggregate
outstanding principal on the revolving line of credit on such
date. The failure to make such payment constitutes an additional
event of default under the credit agreements (the Payment
Default; the Contingent Wavier Default, the Financial
Covenant Defaults and the Payment Default are hereinafter
collectively referred to as the Existing Events of
Default).
As a result of the occurrence and the continuance of the
Existing Events of Default, the lender notified the Company
that, as of July 8, 2009, the interest rate on the
revolving line of credit increased to the then current default
interest rate of 7.25%, which represents the current interest
rate floor, and the interest rate under the term loan agreement
increased to the default interest rate of 30 day LIBOR plus
455 basis points. The Company also did not make a required
$5.0 million principal payment on the term note due on
October 1, 2009 under the covenant waiver for the third
quarter of 2008.
As a result, and as a result of the other Existing Events of
Default, the lender possesses certain rights and remedies,
including the ability to demand immediate payment of amounts due
totaling $63.6 million plus accrued interest or foreclose
on the collateral supporting the credit agreements, being 100%
of the stock of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary, the
Bank.
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance
agreement with its lender that provides for a forbearance period
through March 31, 2010. See Note 2
Forbearance Agreement.
F-25
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 16
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
The Company has performed an evaluation of events that have
occurred subsequent to September 30, 2009 and through
November 9, 2009 (the date of the filing of this
Form 10-Q).
There have been no subsequent events that occurred during such
period that would require disclosure in this
Form 10-Q,
other than those that are described in Note 2
Forbearance Agreement, Note 3 Regulatory
Actions, and Note 15 Credit Agreements, or
would be required to be recognized in the Consolidated Financial
Statements as of or for the three- and nine- month periods
ending September 30, 2009.
F-26
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AT AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
|
|
|
|
|
F-72
|
|
|
|
|
F-74
|
|
F-27
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
61,330
|
|
|
$
|
70,111
|
|
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
|
14,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
63,065
|
|
|
|
84,499
|
|
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value
|
|
|
621,949
|
|
|
|
710,881
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$30,387 at December 31, 2008 and $36,912 at
December 31, 2007)
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
|
|
37,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
652,216
|
|
|
|
748,482
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
|
|
31,698
|
|
|
|
29,264
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
2,509,759
|
|
|
|
2,474,327
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(44,432
|
)
|
|
|
(26,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
2,465,327
|
|
|
|
2,447,579
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
84,675
|
|
|
|
81,166
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
38,313
|
|
|
|
41,821
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
14,683
|
|
|
|
17,044
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
78,862
|
|
|
|
160,407
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
129,355
|
|
|
|
80,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,570,212
|
|
|
$
|
3,692,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
334,495
|
|
|
$
|
321,317
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
2,078,296
|
|
|
|
2,136,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
2,412,791
|
|
|
|
2,458,148
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,000
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
283,400
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
|
|
323,439
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
|
|
60,724
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
34,546
|
|
|
|
38,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,264,378
|
|
|
|
3,317,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see note 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A, $2,500 liquidation preference, 17,250 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007
Series T, $1,000 liquidation preference, 84,784 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008 and none issued
at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 64,000,000 shares
authorized; 29,530,878 shares issued and 27,892,578
outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 29,275,687 shares
issued and 27,803,794 outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
383,491
|
|
|
|
300,762
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings
|
|
|
(66,325
|
)
|
|
|
102,762
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,122
|
)
|
|
|
(13,917
|
)
|
Treasury stock, at cost (1,638,300 shares at
December 31, 2008 and 1,471,893 shares at
December 31, 2007)
|
|
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
305,834
|
|
|
|
375,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,570,212
|
|
|
$
|
3,692,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-28
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
151,120
|
|
|
$
|
155,044
|
|
|
$
|
123,854
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
33,157
|
|
|
|
34,787
|
|
|
|
30,325
|
|
Exempt from federal income taxes
|
|
|
2,316
|
|
|
|
2,269
|
|
|
|
3,570
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Dividend income from Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan
Bank stock
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
187,661
|
|
|
|
193,869
|
|
|
|
159,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
66,025
|
|
|
|
76,692
|
|
|
|
57,518
|
|
Federal funds purchased and FRB discount window advances
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
13,262
|
|
|
|
11,302
|
|
|
|
10,387
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
11,824
|
|
|
|
14,769
|
|
|
|
9,808
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
4,741
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
100,695
|
|
|
|
111,237
|
|
|
|
83,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
86,966
|
|
|
|
82,632
|
|
|
|
75,282
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
71,765
|
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
|
|
12,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
15,201
|
|
|
|
77,741
|
|
|
|
63,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
7,742
|
|
|
|
6,697
|
|
|
|
5,733
|
|
Net (losses) gains on securities transactions
|
|
|
(16,596
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
Impairment loss on securities
|
|
|
(65,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trading profits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
(Loss) gains on sale of loans
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
Insurance and brokerage commissions
|
|
|
2,024
|
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
|
|
1,990
|
|
Trust
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
919
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
3,063
|
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
Gain on sale of property
|
|
|
15,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest (loss) income
|
|
|
(50,596
|
)
|
|
|
15,477
|
|
|
|
14,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
50,389
|
|
|
|
42,215
|
|
|
|
34,476
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
12,714
|
|
|
|
9,482
|
|
|
|
7,076
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
8,590
|
|
|
|
5,470
|
|
|
|
4,971
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
7,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
2,309
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
Merger related
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13,467
|
|
|
|
8,871
|
|
|
|
7,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
177,951
|
|
|
|
71,395
|
|
|
|
58,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(213,346
|
)
|
|
|
21,823
|
|
|
|
19,168
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(55,073
|
)
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(158,273
|
)
|
|
|
18,577
|
|
|
|
17,746
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(162,001
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,048
|
|
|
$
|
17,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(5.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(5.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-29
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
134,857
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92,121
|
|
|
$
|
(3,013
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,606
|
)
|
|
$
|
(454
|
)
|
|
$
|
216,126
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.51 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,060
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,060
|
)
|
Issuance of 2,865,933 shares of stock upon acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
63,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,767
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of 151,894 stock options,
net of tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
Purchase of 204,188 treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,770
|
)
|
|
|
(4,770
|
)
|
Reclassification of restricted stock in conjunction with the
adoption of FAS 123(R)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,013
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 347,179 shares of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture of 9,250 shares of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,547
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,746
|
|
Net increase in fair value of securities classified as
available-for-sale, net of income taxes and reclassification
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
200,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,273
|
)
|
|
|
(5,344
|
)
|
|
|
287,242
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($11.84 per share) on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.52 per share) on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,418
|
)
|
Issuance of 17,250 shares of preferred stock, net of
issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,441
|
|
Issuance of 3,680,725 shares of stock upon acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
54,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,990
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of 36,443 stock options,
net of tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
Purchase of 661,500 treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,392
|
)
|
|
|
(9,392
|
)
|
Issuance of 59,700 shares of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,577
|
|
Net decrease in fair value of securities classified as
available-for-sale, net of income taxes and reclassification
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
300,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,917
|
)
|
|
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
|
375,164
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($193.75 per share) on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,342
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.26 per share) on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,404
|
)
|
Issuance of 84,784 shares of preferred stock
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,555
|
|
Issuance of warrant to purchase 4,282,020 shares of common
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of 16,500 stock options,
net of tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Issuance of 24,168 shares of common stock to employee stock
purchase plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Issuance of 278,324 shares of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accreted discount on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,897
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158,273
|
)
|
Prior service cost resulting from the application of
SFAS No. 87, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(433
|
)
|
Net decrease in the projected benefit obligation, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
Net increase in fair value of securities classified as
available-for-sale, net of income taxes and reclassification
adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146,478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
|
$
|
383,491
|
|
|
$
|
5,229
|
|
|
$
|
(66,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
$
|
305,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-30
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(158,273
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,577
|
|
|
$
|
17,746
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
4,206
|
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
2,546
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
71,765
|
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
|
|
12,050
|
|
Amortization of other intangibles and purchase accounting
adjustments
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of trading securities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities, net
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
Realized loss (gain) on sales of securities
|
|
|
16,596
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
Impairment loss on securities
|
|
|
65,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sales of trading securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(624
|
)
|
Net gain on sales of mortgage loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(760
|
)
|
Originations of loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,800
|
)
|
|
|
(61,163
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,915
|
|
|
|
61,163
|
|
Loss on sale of loans
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of property
|
|
|
(15,196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss of early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
7,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
(3,509
|
)
|
|
|
(3,063
|
)
|
|
|
(2,394
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(43,757
|
)
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
5,373
|
|
Loss on sale of other real estate, net
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned stock based compensation
|
|
|
2,897
|
|
|
|
3,085
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Change in other assets
|
|
|
(12,122
|
)
|
|
|
7,602
|
|
|
|
(15,943
|
)
|
Change in other liabilities
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(14,569
|
)
|
|
|
10,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
17,016
|
|
|
|
23,871
|
|
|
|
34,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
108,770
|
|
|
|
189,495
|
|
|
|
101,730
|
|
Redemption of Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank
stock
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
Sales of securities held-to maturity
|
|
|
4,262
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
137,725
|
|
|
|
93,571
|
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
Principal payments on securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
50,875
|
|
|
|
69,254
|
|
|
|
77,164
|
|
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(270,533
|
)
|
|
|
(428,468
|
)
|
|
|
(80,771
|
)
|
Purchases of Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank
stock
|
|
|
(4,974
|
)
|
|
|
(3,128
|
)
|
|
|
(8,931
|
)
|
Maturities of securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
4,435
|
|
Principal payments on securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
2,966
|
|
|
|
5,665
|
|
|
|
8,829
|
|
Purchase of mortgage loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,776
|
)
|
|
|
(10,014
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of mortgages
|
|
|
5,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan originations and principal collections, net
|
|
|
(103,298
|
)
|
|
|
(85,378
|
)
|
|
|
(98,312
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of branch property
|
|
|
18,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,403
|
|
Cash paid, net of cash and cash equivalents in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71,658
|
)
|
|
|
(41,044
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of other real estate
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
Investment in life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,926
|
)
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(3,889
|
)
|
|
|
(3,869
|
)
|
|
|
(5,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(52,804
|
)
|
|
|
(237,099
|
)
|
|
|
(26,909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
|
|
|
(44,997
|
)
|
|
|
29,324
|
|
|
|
(32,218
|
)
|
Payments of junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated
trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
|
|
289,600
|
|
|
|
192,500
|
|
|
|
365,000
|
|
Repayments on borrowings
|
|
|
(234,075
|
)
|
|
|
(120,000
|
)
|
|
|
(200,000
|
)
|
Preferred cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(3,342
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Common cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(11,076
|
)
|
|
|
(13,004
|
)
|
|
|
(11,439
|
)
|
Change in federal funds purchased and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(66,750
|
)
|
|
|
91,151
|
|
|
|
(95,729
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock to employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock and warrant
|
|
|
84,784
|
|
|
|
41,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,392
|
)
|
|
|
(4,770
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of treasury stock under stock option plan
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
14,354
|
|
|
|
197,195
|
|
|
|
22,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(21,434
|
)
|
|
|
(16,033
|
)
|
|
|
29,933
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
84,499
|
|
|
|
100,532
|
|
|
|
70,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
63,065
|
|
|
$
|
84,499
|
|
|
$
|
100,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
103,436
|
|
|
$
|
109,483
|
|
|
$
|
80,191
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
10,100
|
|
|
|
2,811
|
|
Dividends declared not paid
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,672
|
|
|
$
|
3,258
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash assets acquired
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
624,270
|
|
|
$
|
619,835
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497,622
|
|
|
$
|
515,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net noncash assets acquired
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
126,648
|
|
|
$
|
104,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents acquired
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,066
|
|
|
$
|
24,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-31
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
Note 1
|
Nature of
Operations
|
Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the Company) is a bank
holding company organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware. Through its commercial bank and non-bank subsidiaries,
the Company provides a full line of financial services to
corporate and individual customers located in the greater
Chicago metropolitan area. These services include demand, time,
and savings deposits; lending; brokerage and insurance products;
and trust services. While the Companys management monitors
the revenue streams of the various products and services,
operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on
a Company-wide basis. The Company operates in one business
segment, community banking, providing a full range of services
to individual and corporate customers. The following disclosures
are all related to continuing operations. The Company acquired
Northwest Suburban Bancorp., Inc. and Royal American Corporation
effective October 1, 2007 and July 1, 2006,
respectively. See Note 3 Business Combinations
for more details.
|
|
Note 2
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of Presentation:
The consolidated
financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Midwest Bank and
Trust Company (the Bank). Included in the Bank
are its wholly owned subsidiaries MBTC Investment Company,
Midwest Funding, L.L.C., and Midwest Financial and Investment
Services, Inc. (formerly known as Royal American Investment
Services, Inc.). Significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of the
consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are
particularly susceptible to change are the allowance for loan
losses, income taxes, and the fair value of financial
instruments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Cash and cash
equivalents include cash, deposits with other financial
institutions under 90 days, and federal funds sold. The
Bank is required to maintain reserve balances in cash or on
deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank, based on a percentage of
deposits. The total of those reserve balances was
$3.0 million at December 31, 2008.
Securities:
Securities are classified as
held-to-maturity when the Company has the ability and the
positive intent to hold those securities to maturity.
Accordingly, they are stated at cost adjusted for amortization
of premiums and accretion of discounts. Securities are
classified as available-for-sale when the Company may decide to
sell those securities due to changes in market interest rates,
liquidity needs, changes in yields or alternative investments,
and for other reasons. They are carried at fair value with
unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported in other
comprehensive income. Interest income is reported net of
amortization of premium and accretion of discount. Realized
gains and losses on disposition of securities available-for-sale
are based on the net proceeds and the adjusted carrying amounts
of the securities sold, using the specific identification
method. Trading securities are carried at fair value. Realized
and unrealized gains and losses on trading securities are
recognized in the statement of income as they occur. No trading
securities were held at December 31, 2008 or 2007. Declines
in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale
securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than
temporary, if any, are reflected in earnings as realized losses.
In estimating other-than-temporary losses, management considers
(1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair
value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition
and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent
and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the
issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in fair value.
Loans:
Loans are reported net of the allowance
for loan losses and deferred fees. Impaired loans are carried at
the present value of expected future cash flows or the fair
value of the related collateral, if the loan is considered to be
collateral dependent. Interest on loans is included in interest
income over the term of the
F-32
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
loan based upon the principal balance outstanding. The accrual
of interest on loans is discontinued at the time the loan
becomes 90 days past due unless the credit is well-secured
and in process of collection. Past due status is based on
contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on
nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of
principal or interest is considered doubtful. All interest
accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on
nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. The interest on
these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery
method, until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are
returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest
amounts contractually due are brought current and future
payments are reasonably assured.
Deferred Loan Fees and Costs:
Loan origination
fees and origination costs are deferred and amortized over the
life of the loan as an adjustment to yield.
Allowance for Loan Losses:
The allowance for
loan losses represents managements estimate of probable
credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Estimating the
amount of the allowance for loan losses requires significant
judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and
timing of expected future cash flows and collateral values on
impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans
based on historical loss experience, and consideration of
current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be
susceptible to significant change. Loan losses are charged off
against the allowance, while recoveries of amounts previously
charged off are credited to the allowance. A provision for loan
losses is charged to operations based on managements
periodic evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, as well
as other pertinent factors.
The Companys methodology for determining the allowance for
loan losses represents an estimation pursuant to Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, and
SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan. The allowance reflects expected
losses resulting from analyses developed through specific credit
allocations for individual loans and historical loss experience
for each loan category. The specific credit allocations are
based on regular analyses of all loans over $300,000 where the
internal credit rating is at or below a predetermined
classification. These analyses involve a high degree of judgment
in estimating the amount of loss associated with specific loans,
including estimating the amount and timing of future cash flows
and collateral values. The allowance for loan losses also
includes consideration of concentrations and changes in
portfolio mix and volume, and other qualitative factors. In
addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their
examinations, may require the Company to make additions to the
allowance based on their judgment about information available to
them at the time of their examinations.
There are many factors affecting the allowance for loan losses;
some are quantitative while others require qualitative judgment.
The process for determining the allowance includes subjective
elements and, therefore, may be susceptible to significant
change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management
estimates, additional provision for loan losses could be
required that could adversely affect earnings or financial
position in future periods.
A loan is impaired when full payment under the loan terms is not
expected. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance
loans of a similar nature such as residential mortgage and
consumer loans and on an individual basis for other loans that
exceed a set threshold. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the
allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the
present value of estimated future cash flows using the
loans existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if
repayment is expected solely from the collateral.
Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance:
The
Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain
executive and other officers. Life insurance is recorded at its
cash surrender value or the amount that can be realized.
Premises and Equipment:
Premises and equipment
are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Provisions for depreciation and amortization,
included in operating expenses, are computed on the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets ranging from three to thirty-nine years.
F-33
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to income as
incurred; significant improvements are capitalized.
Foreclosed Properties:
Real estate acquired in
settlement of loans is recorded at fair value when acquired,
establishing a new cost basis. Expenditures that increase the
fair value of properties are capitalized as an adjustment to the
cost basis. If fair value declines below the cost basis, a
valuation allowance is recorded through expense.
Core Deposit and Other Intangibles:
Other
intangible assets consist of core deposit and acquired customer
relationship intangible assets arising from whole bank, branch,
and non-bank acquisitions. They are initially measured at fair
value and then are amortized on an accelerated method over their
estimated useful lives.
Goodwill:
Goodwill results from business
acquisitions and represents the excess of the purchase price
over the fair value of acquired net tangible assets and
identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is not amortized but
assessed at least annually, at September 30, for
impairment, and any such impairment is recognized in the period
it is identified.
Income Taxes:
Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for temporary differences between the
financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the
Companys assets and liabilities. Deferred taxes are
recognized for the estimated taxes ultimately payable or
recoverable based on enacted tax laws. Changes in enacted tax
rates and laws are reflected in the financial statements in the
periods they occur. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a
valuation allowance when, in the judgment of management, it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred
tax assets will not be realized.
Securities Sold Under Agreements to
Repurchase:
All securities sold under agreements
to repurchase represent amounts advanced by various primary
dealers. Securities are pledged to secure these liabilities.
Transfers of Financial Assets:
Transfers of
financial assets are accounted for as sales only when control
over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred
assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have
been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains
the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking
advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred
assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective
control over the transferred assets through an agreement to
repurchase them before their maturity.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments and
Derivatives:
Fair values of financial
instruments, including derivatives, are estimated using relevant
market information and other assumptions. Fair value estimates
involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment
regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other
factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for
particular items. There is no readily available market for a
significant portion of the Companys financial instruments.
Accordingly, fair values are based on various factors relative
to expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk
characteristics, and other factors. The assumptions and
estimates used in the fair value determination process are
subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and significant
judgment. As a consequence, fair values cannot be determined
with precision. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions
could significantly affect these estimates.
Stock Compensation:
Employee compensation cost
relating to share-based payment transactions, including grants
of employee stock options and restricted stock awards, are
measured at fair value and recognized in the financial
statements as prescribed by SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 123(R) in 2006 using the modified prospective
method. Employee compensation expense for stock options and
restricted stock granted is recorded in the consolidated income
statement based on the grants vesting schedule.
Forfeitures of stock options and restricted stock grants are
estimated for those grants where the requisite service is not
expected to be rendered. The grant-date fair value for each
stock options grant is calculated using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model.
F-34
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Comprehensive Income:
Comprehensive income
includes both net income and other comprehensive income
elements, including the change in unrealized gains and losses on
securities available-for-sale as well as the prior service cost
and unrealized gains and losses related to the projected benefit
obligation of the Supplemental Executive Retirement plan, net of
tax.
Earnings Per Common Share:
Basic earnings per
common share is net income available to common stockholders
divided by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share
includes the dilutive effect of additional potential common
shares issuable under stock options, the warrant, and restricted
stock awards as well as under the if converted
method for the noncumulative redeemable convertible perpetual
preferred stock. Earnings and dividends per share are restated
for all stock splits and dividends through the date of issue of
the financial statements.
Dividend Restriction:
Banking regulations
require the Company and the Bank to maintain certain capital
levels and may limit the dividends paid by the Bank to the
Company or by the Company to stockholders. The Company will only
be able to pay dividends with the approval of the
U.S. Treasury Department.
Reclassifications:
Certain items in the prior
year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the
current years presentation. Such reclassifications had no
effect on net income.
Accounting
Pronouncements:
In June 2006, the FASB released FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting
and reporting for uncertainties in the application of income tax
laws, providing a comprehensive model for the financial
statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure
of income tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income
tax returns. The Companys adoption of FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007 did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial position and results of
operations. See Note 22 Income Taxes for more
details.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements, to provide guidance in
the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements.
SAB No. 108 requires registrants to quantify an error
under two methods: (1) quantify the misstatement based on
the amount of the error originating in the current-year income
statement (Rollover Approach) and (2) quantify
the misstatement based on the effects of correcting the
misstatement existing in the balance sheet at the end of the
current-year irrespective of the misstatements year(s)
origination (Iron Curtain Approach). Consequently, a
registrants financial statements would require adjustment
when either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that
is material, after considering all relevant quantitative and
qualitative factors. SAB No. 108 was effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years ending after
November 15, 2006. The application of SAB No. 108 as
of January 1, 2007 did not have any impact on the
Companys results of operations or financial position.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, on January 1, 2008, which defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP,
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements
where the FASB had previously concluded in those pronouncements
that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute.
Accordingly, SFAS No. 157 does not require any new
financial assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. In
February 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. FAS 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157. This
FSP delays the effective dates of SFAS No. 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring
basis (at least annually) to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008. In October 2008, the FASB issued Staff
Position
157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a
Market That Is Not Active (FSP
No. 157-3),
which clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in an
inactive market and provides an illustrative example to
demonstrate how the fair value of a financial asset
F-35
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
is to be determined when the market for that financial asset is
not active. FSP
No. 157-3
became effective for the Companys interim financial
statements as of September 30, 2008 and did not
significantly impact the methods by which the Company determines
the fair values of its financial assets. The adoption of
SFAS No. 157 did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations or consolidated financial
position. See Note 17 Fair Value for more
information.
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations, which replaces the current
standard on business combinations, modifies the accounting for
business combinations and requires, with limited exceptions, the
acquirer in a business combination to recognize all of the
assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interests in the acquire at the acquisition-date, at fair value.
SFAS No. 141(R) also requires certain contingent
assets and liabilities acquired as well as contingent
consideration to be recognized at fair value. In addition, the
statement requires payments to third parties for consulting,
legal, audit, and similar services associated with an
acquisition to be recognized as expenses when incurred rather
than capitalized as part of the cost of the acquisition.
SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and early adoption
is not permitted.
In June 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) on Issue
No. 07-5,
Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is
Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock (EITF
No. 07-5).
EITF
No. 07-5
provides guidance for determining whether an equity-linked
financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an
entitys own stock. EITF
No. 07-5
applies to any freestanding financial instrument or embedded
feature that has all of the characteristics of a derivative or
freestanding instrument that is potentially settled in an
entitys own stock (with the exception of share-based
payment awards within the scope of SFAS 123(R)). To meet
the definition of indexed to own stock, an
instruments contingent exercise provisions must not be
based on (a) an observable market, other than the market
for the issuers stock (if applicable), or (b) an
observable index, other than an index calculated or measured
solely by reference to the issuers own operations, and the
variables that could affect the settlement amount must be inputs
to the fair value of a fixed-for-fixed forward or
option on equity shares. EITF
No. 07-5
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company
does not anticipate a material effect on its results of
operations or consolidated financial position from adopting EITF
No. 07-5.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures by Public Entities
(Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests
in Variable Interest Entities (FSP
No. FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8). FSP
No. FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 amends SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishment of Liabilities and
FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, requiring additional disclosures about transfers
of financial assets and the involvement with variable interest
entities. These additional disclosures are intended to provide
greater transparency about a transferors continuing
involvement with transferred assets and variable interest
entities. FSP
No. FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of FSP
No. FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8 did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations or consolidated financial
position.
In June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position
EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities
(FSP
EITF 03-6-1),
which addresses whether instruments granted in share-based
payment transactions are participating securities prior to
vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings
allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class
method described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of
SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share.
The Company adopted FSP
EITF 03-6-1
on January 1, 2009. The consolidated statement of
operations and all basic and diluted earnings per share for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 have been
restated to give effect to an allocation of income to
participating securities. This allocation reduced income
available to common stockholders and decreased both basic and
diluted earnings per share by $0.01 for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006. Note 23 has been updated
to reflect the restated amounts
F-36
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and the unaudited earnings per share information in Notes 3
and 26 have been revised to reflect the impact of the change in
accounting.
|
|
Note 3
|
Business
Combinations
|
Northwest
Suburban Bancorp, Inc.
On October 1, 2007, the Company acquired Northwest Suburban
Bancorp, Inc. (Northwest Suburban), in a cash and
stock merger transaction. The agreement and plan of merger
provided that the Companys stock comprise up to 45% of the
purchase price, at an exchange ratio of 2.4551 shares of
Company common stock for each Northwest Suburban common share,
and that the remainder be paid in cash at the rate of $42.75 for
each share of Northwest Suburban common stock. The Company
issued 3.7 million shares of common stock, paid
$81.2 million in cash, and incurred $414,000 in acquisition
costs which were capitalized for a total purchase price of
$136.7 million at the closing on October 1, 2007. The
Company used the proceeds from a $75.0 million term note it
has under a borrowing facility with a correspondent bank to pay
for a portion of the cash requirement of the acquisition.
Northwest Suburban was merged into the Company, thus canceling
100% of Northwest Suburbans voting shares outstanding.
The acquisition of Northwest Suburban constituted a business
combination under SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations, and was accounted for using the purchase
method. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the
respective assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on
their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. The
excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets
acquired was recorded as goodwill, which is not deductible for
tax purposes. The purchase price allocation was finalized in the
third quarter of 2008. The results of operations of Northwest
Suburban have been included in the Companys results of
operations since October 1, 2007, the date of acquisition.
The following are the adjustments made to record the transaction
and to adjust Northwest Suburbans assets and liabilities
to their estimated fair values at acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Purchase price of Northwest Suburban:
|
|
|
|
|
Market value of the Companys stock issued
|
|
$
|
55,137
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
81,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
|
136,300
|
|
Capitalized costs
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost
|
|
$
|
136,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical net assets of Northwest Suburban
|
|
$
|
52,388
|
|
Fair market value adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
Loans
|
|
|
(970
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
80,550
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
8,061
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
(2,140
|
)
|
Severance
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Deferred taxes on purchase accounting adjustment
|
|
|
(2,490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to record the transaction
|
|
$
|
136,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
from Northwest Suburban at October 1, 2007, including the
adjustments made to record the transaction and to adjust the
assets and liabilities to their estimated fair values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northwest
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Suburban
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
10,066
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,066
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
57,920
|
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
57,597
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
437,452
|
|
|
|
(970
|
)
|
|
|
436,482
|
|
Cash value of life insurance
|
|
|
12,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,884
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
17,553
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
19,279
|
|
Core deposit intangible, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,061
|
|
|
|
8,061
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,550
|
|
|
|
80,550
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
7,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
545,292
|
|
|
|
89,044
|
|
|
|
634,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
468,520
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
470,660
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
6,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,170
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
Other liabilities (including severance)
|
|
|
4,404
|
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
|
|
6,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
492,904
|
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
|
|
497,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired less liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
52,388
|
|
|
$
|
84,326
|
|
|
$
|
136,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal
American Corporation
Effective July 1, 2006, the Company acquired Royal American
Corporation (Royal American), a bank holding
company, in a cash and stock merger transaction. At acquisition,
Royal American had total assets of $561.2 million. The
Companys stock comprised approximately 50% of the purchase
price, at an exchange ratio of 3.58429 shares of Company
common stock for each Royal American common share, and the
remainder was paid in cash at the rate of $80 for each share of
Royal American common stock. The Company issued 2.9 million
common shares, paid $64.6 million in cash, and incurred
$795,000 in costs which were capitalized for a total purchase
price of $129.2 million. Royal American was merged into the
Company, thus canceling 100% of Royal Americans voting
shares outstanding.
The acquisition of Royal American constituted a business
combination under SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations, and was accounted for using the purchase
method. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the
respective assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on
their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. The
excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets
acquired was recorded as goodwill, which is not deductible for
tax purposes. The purchase price allocation was finalized in the
first quarter of 2007. The results of operations of Royal
American have been included in the Companys results of
operations since July 1, 2006, the date of acquisition.
F-38
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the adjustments made to record the transaction
and to adjust Royal Americans assets and liabilities to
their estimated fair values at July 1, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Purchase price of Royal American:
|
|
|
|
|
Market value of the Companys stock issued
|
|
$
|
63,767
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
64,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
|
128,379
|
|
Capitalized costs
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost
|
|
$
|
129,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical net assets of Royal American
|
|
$
|
44,606
|
|
Fair market value adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
(2,837
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
78,597
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
10,488
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
41
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advance
|
|
|
146
|
|
Junior subordinated debenture
|
|
|
204
|
|
Deferred taxes on purchase accounting adjustment
|
|
|
(3,938
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to record the transaction
|
|
$
|
129,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
from Royal American at July 1, 2006, including the
adjustments made to record the transaction and to adjust the
assets and liabilities to their estimated fair values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royal
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
American
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
24,363
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,363
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
16,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,487
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
497,376
|
|
|
|
(2,837
|
)
|
|
|
494,539
|
|
Cash value of life insurance
|
|
|
12,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,467
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
Core deposit intangible, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,488
|
|
|
|
10,488
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,597
|
|
|
|
78,597
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
557,909
|
|
|
|
86,289
|
|
|
|
644,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
467,878
|
|
|
|
(1,867
|
)
|
|
|
466,011
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
4,854
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
10,106
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
3,938
|
|
|
|
4,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
513,303
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
515,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired less liabilities assumed
|
|
$
|
44,606
|
|
|
$
|
84,568
|
|
|
$
|
129,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following are the unaudited pro forma consolidated results
of operations of the Company for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 as though Northwest Suburban and
Royal American had been acquired as of January 1, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
96,429
|
|
|
$
|
106,061
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
16,983
|
|
|
|
20,386
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
Included in the pro forma results of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were merger-related
expenses, primarily
change-in-control
and severance payments, investment banker, legal and audit fees,
net of tax of $4.3 million and $6.8 million,
respectively.
F-40
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The amortized cost and fair value of securities
available-for-sale and held-to-maturity are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury and U.S. government-sponsored
entities(1)
|
|
$
|
263,483
|
|
|
$
|
1,952
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
265,435
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
57,309
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
56,664
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities(1)(2)
|
|
|
281,592
|
|
|
|
3,363
|
|
|
|
(1,276
|
)
|
|
|
283,679
|
|
Equity securities(3)
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,819
|
)
|
|
|
930
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
19,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,935
|
)
|
|
|
15,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
624,309
|
|
|
$
|
5,556
|
|
|
$
|
(7,916
|
)
|
|
$
|
621,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
1,251
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,263
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities(1)(2)
|
|
|
29,016
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
29,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
30,267
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (FHLMC) and Federal National Mortgage Association
(FNMA).
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes obligations of the Government National Mortgage
Association (GNMA).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes issues from government-sponsored entities (FNMA and
FHLMC).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government-sponsored entities(1)
|
|
$
|
181,983
|
|
|
$
|
1,630
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
183,613
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
60,985
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
61,400
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities(1)(2)
|
|
|
383,633
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(4,651
|
)
|
|
|
379,040
|
|
Equity securities(3)
|
|
|
85,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,160
|
)
|
|
|
65,979
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
22,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,246
|
)
|
|
|
20,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
733,835
|
|
|
$
|
2,238
|
|
|
$
|
(25,192
|
)
|
|
$
|
710,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
1,254
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,268
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities(1)(2)
|
|
|
36,347
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
35,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
37,601
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
(711
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of the FHLMC and FNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes obligations of the GNMA.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes issues from government-sponsored entities (FNMA and
FHLMC).
|
F-41
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary of the fair value of securities
held-to-maturity and available-for-sale with unrealized losses
and the time period of those unrealized losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
34,293
|
|
|
$
|
(886
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,293
|
|
|
$
|
(886
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities(1)
|
|
|
60,117
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
39,778
|
|
|
|
(1,078
|
)
|
|
|
99,895
|
|
|
|
(1,276
|
)
|
Equity securities(2)
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
(1,819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
(1,819
|
)
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
3,746
|
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
11,495
|
|
|
|
(3,648
|
)
|
|
|
15,241
|
|
|
|
(3,935
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
99,055
|
|
|
|
(3,190
|
)
|
|
|
51,273
|
|
|
|
(4,726
|
)
|
|
|
150,328
|
|
|
|
(7,916
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,521
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
20,521
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,521
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
20,771
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
99,305
|
|
|
$
|
(3,190
|
)
|
|
$
|
71,794
|
|
|
$
|
(4,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
171,099
|
|
|
$
|
(7,946
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of the FHLMC and FNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes issues from government-sponsored entities (FNMA and
FHLMC).
|
F-42
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
5,121
|
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,900
|
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,021
|
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities(1)
|
|
|
39,127
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
331,054
|
|
|
|
(4,469
|
)
|
|
|
370,181
|
|
|
|
(4,651
|
)
|
Equity securities(2)
|
|
|
65,979
|
|
|
|
(19,160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,979
|
|
|
|
(19,160
|
)
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
10,479
|
|
|
|
(603
|
)
|
|
|
10,370
|
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
20,849
|
|
|
|
(1,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
120,706
|
|
|
|
(19,980
|
)
|
|
|
351,324
|
|
|
|
(5,212
|
)
|
|
|
472,030
|
|
|
|
(25,192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,105
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
8,105
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,394
|
|
|
|
(657
|
)
|
|
|
26,394
|
|
|
|
(657
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,499
|
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
34,499
|
|
|
|
(711
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
120,706
|
|
|
$
|
(19,980
|
)
|
|
$
|
385,823
|
|
|
$
|
(5,923
|
)
|
|
$
|
506,529
|
|
|
$
|
(25,903
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of the FHLMC and FNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes issues from government-sponsored entities (FNMA and
FHLMC).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes obligations of the GNMA.
|
The unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities is
included, net of tax, in other comprehensive loss on the
consolidated balance sheets. Management does not believe any
individual unrealized loss as of December 31, 2008,
identified in the preceding table, represents
other-than-temporary impairment. These unrealized losses are
primarily attributable to the current credit environment and
turmoil in the market for securities related to the housing
industry. The Company has both the intent and ability to hold
each of the securities shown in the table for the time necessary
to recover its amortized cost.
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized loss for U.S. government-sponsored
entities mortgage-backed securities relate primarily to
debt securities issued by FNMA and FHLMC. Each of these
securities has a stated maturity date. FNMA has an issuer rating
of Aaa by Moodys and a long-term issuer default rating of
AAA by Fitch. FHLMC has senior secured and unsecured debt
ratings of Aaa by Moodys and a long-term issuer default
rating of AAA by Fitch. These mortgage-backed securities are
notes with a weighted average maturity of approximately
26 years and a weighted average interest rate of 4.06%.
|
|
|
|
The unrealized losses on corporate and other debt securities
relate to securities which were rated A- or better by either
Moodys or S&P as of December 31, 2008. These
debt securities have a weighted average maturity of
approximately 19 years and a weighted average interest rate
of 3.35%.
|
F-43
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge
of $17.6 million at March 31, 2008 on certain FNMA and
FHLMC preferred equity securities with a cost basis of
$85.1 million. In September 2008, the Company sold
$16.9 million of the remaining $67.5 million
recognizing a $16.7 million loss. The Company recognized an
additional other-than-temporary impairment charge of
$47.8 million at September 30, 2008 on the remaining
securities and thereby reduced the amortized cost to their fair
value of $2.7 million. Management believes this impairment
was primarily attributable to economic conditions at that time,
FNMA and FHLMC being placed into the Federal Housing Finance
Agencys conservatorship and the discontinued dividend
payments. Since recovery did not appear likely in the near
future, the Company recognized the impairment losses.
Securities with an approximate carrying value of
$623.7 million and $600.2 million at December 31,
2008 and 2007 were pledged to secure public deposits,
borrowings, and for other purposes as required or permitted by
law. Included in securities pledged at December 31, 2008
and 2007 are $113.5 million and $183.9 million,
respectively, which have been pledged for FHLB borrowings.
The amortized cost and fair value of securities by contractual
maturity at December 31, 2008 are shown below. Expected
maturities will differ from contractual maturities because
borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with
or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
8,243
|
|
|
$
|
8,369
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
63,791
|
|
|
|
64,497
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
244,611
|
|
|
|
244,228
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
23,323
|
|
|
|
20,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,968
|
|
|
|
337,340
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
281,592
|
|
|
|
283,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
621,560
|
|
|
|
621,019
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
624,309
|
|
|
$
|
621,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
29,016
|
|
|
|
29,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
30,267
|
|
|
$
|
30,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale and the
realized gross gains and losses are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales
|
|
$
|
108,770
|
|
|
$
|
189,495
|
|
|
$
|
101,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
|
(17,111
|
)
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains (losses) on securities transactions
|
|
$
|
(16,786
|
)
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As permitted under SFAS No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, certain
securities held-to-maturity, where a substantial portion of
their principal outstanding was collected and had a carrying
value of $4.3 million were sold in 2008 at a gain of
$151,000 and securities held-to-maturity with a carrying value
of $2.1 million were sold in 2007 at a loss of $30,000.
These securities had paid down to less than 15% of their
original face value.
Major classifications of loans are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
1,090,078
|
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,079,631
|
|
|
|
43.6
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
366,178
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
464,583
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
729,729
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
627,928
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
194,673
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
142,158
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
6,332
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
10,689
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
123,161
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
149,703
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross
|
|
|
2,510,151
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,474,692
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
$
|
2,509,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,474,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period
presentation.
|
During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company revised its
classification of commercial loans and commercial real estate
loans, changing its prior practice of classifying as commercial
real estate loans all loans to businesses that included real
estate as collateral (collateral-based
classification). The classification of construction, home
equity, and residential mortgages were also reviewed. The new
method of presentation (source of repayment
classification) recognizes that loans to owner-occupied
businesses engaged in manufacturing, sales
and/or
services are commercial loans regardless of whether real estate
is taken as collateral. These loans generally have a lower risk
profile than traditional commercial real estate loans. They are
primarily dependent on the borrowers business-generated
cash flows for repayment, not on the conversion of real estate
that may be pledged as collateral. Loans related to rental
income producing properties and properties intended to be sold
will continue to be classified as commercial real estate loans.
Completing this change in methodology involved a
loan-by-loan
review of the Companys commercial and commercial real
estate loans.
F-45
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company reclassified $5.0 million and $1.9 million
in overdraft deposits to loans as of December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
Statement of Position
03-3,
Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired
in a Transfer
(SOP 03-3)
addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash
flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an
investors initial investment in loans or debt securities
acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at
least in part, to credit quality. It includes loans acquired in
purchase business combinations and applies to all
nongovernmental entities.
SOP 03-3
does not apply to loans originated by the Company. The
Companys assessment of loans acquired in the acquisition
of Northwest Suburban as of October 1, 2007 identified
$5.9 million in acquired loans to which the application of
the provisions of
SOP 03-3
was required. As a result of the application of
SOP 03-3,
the Company recorded purchase accounting adjustments reflecting
a reduction in loans of $2.0 million related to acquired
impaired loans, thus reducing the carrying value of these loans
to $3.9 million as of December 31, 2007. The carrying
value of these loans was $778,000 as of December 31, 2008,
and there continues to be no allowance for loan losses regarding
these loans. The Company does not consider prepayments in the
determination of contractual or expected cash flows.
The following is the carrying value by source of repayment
category for loans subject to
SOP 03-3:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
531
|
|
|
$
|
726
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying value
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
|
$
|
3,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of changes in the accretable yield
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The full contractual payment was received on a loan originally
accounted for under
SOP 03-3,
and goodwill was reduced in second quarter of 2008 by the
remaining fair value adjustment of that loan.
|
|
Note 6
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Certain executive officers, directors, and their related
interests are loan customers of the Bank. These loans were made
under comparable terms as for non-related parties and were
determined to be arms-length
F-46
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
transactions. A summary of loans made by the Bank to or for the
benefit of directors, executive officers, and their related
interests is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
40,984
|
|
New loans
|
|
|
12,213
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(5,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
47,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7
|
Allowance
for Loan Losses
|
The following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan
losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
26,748
|
|
|
$
|
23,229
|
|
Addition resulting from acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,767
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
71,765
|
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(55,849
|
)
|
|
|
(5,975
|
)
|
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off
|
|
|
(54,081
|
)
|
|
|
(4,139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
44,432
|
|
|
$
|
26,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to
impaired loans. Information with respect to impaired loans and
the related allowance for loan losses is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Impaired loans for which no allowance for loan losses is
allocated
|
|
$
|
21,784
|
|
|
$
|
15,490
|
|
Impaired loans with an allocation of the allowance for loan
losses
|
|
|
43,180
|
|
|
|
43,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
64,964
|
|
|
$
|
59,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses allocated to impaired loans
|
|
$
|
4,546
|
|
|
$
|
14,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Average impaired loans
|
|
$
|
57,058
|
|
|
$
|
54,956
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans on a cash basis
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
1,432
|
|
Interest payments on impaired loans are generally applied to
principal, unless the loan principal is considered to be fully
collectible, in which case interest is recognized on a cash
basis.
Nonaccrual loans were $61.1 million and $49.2 million
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. There were
no loans past due 90 days but still accruing as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007. There was $11.0 million in
troubled-debt restructured loans as of December 31, 2008
and none as of December 31, 2007.
F-47
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In order to improve the collectibility of the troubled-debt
restructuring, the Company restructured the terms of the debt by
lifting the forebearance agreement and lowering the interest
rates including changing them from fixed to floating rates. No
additional commitments were outstanding on the troubled-debt
restructured loans as of December 31, 2008. These
troubled-debt restructured loans were still accruing and no
allowance was allocated at December 31, 2008.
|
|
Note 8
|
Premises
and Equipment
|
Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
$
|
14,456
|
|
|
$
|
15,609
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
33,992
|
|
|
|
35,686
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
28,696
|
|
|
|
26,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost
|
|
|
77,144
|
|
|
|
77,804
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(38,831
|
)
|
|
|
(35,983
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
38,313
|
|
|
$
|
41,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 28, 2008, the Company sold two pieces of real
property for $18.4 million creating a pre-tax gain of
$15.2 million. The properties (a building with a parking
lot and a second parking lot) are located in the Bucktown area
of Chicago at 1601 North Milwaukee Avenue and
1617-1622
North Damen Avenue. The Company will continue to operate its
existing Milwaukee Avenue branch in Bucktown through a
continuing occupancy arrangement with the buyer after which it
expects to relocate to a new branch in close proximity to the
existing branch location in the second quarter of 2009. The
Company pays $75,000 per month to rent the Milwaukee Avenue
space and has vacated the Damen Avenue parking lot. The Company
is responsible for one-half of the real estate taxes and the
premiums for casualty and liability insurance on the Milwaukee
Avenue property during the occupancy period.
|
|
Note 9
|
Goodwill
and Core Deposit Intangibles
|
The following table presents the carrying amount and accumulated
amortization of intangible assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortizing intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangibles
|
|
$
|
21,091
|
|
|
$
|
(6,408
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,683
|
|
|
$
|
21,091
|
|
|
$
|
(4,047
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,044
|
|
The amortization of intangible assets was $2.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008. At December 31,
2008, the projected amortization of intangible assets is
$2.3 million, $2.2 million, $1.9 million,
$1.8 million, $1.7 million for the years ending
December 31, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, respectively,
and $4.8 million in total for the subsequent years. The
weighted average amortization period for the core deposit
intangibles is approximately eight years as of December 31,
2008.
F-48
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount
of goodwill and other intangibles during the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
160,407
|
|
|
$
|
17,044
|
|
|
$
|
79,488
|
|
|
$
|
11,273
|
|
Addition resulting from acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,550
|
|
|
|
8,061
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(80,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,702
|
)
|
Purchase price adjustment(1)
|
|
|
(1,545
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible retired(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(588
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
78,862
|
|
|
$
|
14,683
|
|
|
$
|
160,407
|
|
|
$
|
17,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
On January 3, 2003, the Company purchased Big Foot
Financial Corp. As a result of this acquisition, the Company had
unrecognized tax benefits related to employee severance payments
and acquisition costs. These unrecognized tax benefits were
recognized in the first quarter of 2007, when the statute of
limitations for Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audit
of the final short period return closed. These unrecognized tax
benefits, totaling $429,000, were credited to the core deposit
intangible created as a result of the acquisition. A reversal of
$283,000 in tax liability established on the date of acquisition
was also credited to the core deposit intangible in the first
quarter of 2007. During the third quarter of 2007, the core
deposit intangible was increased by $124,000 due to an
adjustment related the estimated tax liability established on
the date of acquisition. Goodwill was reduced in the second
quarter of 2008 by the remaining fair value adjustment of a loan
accounted for under
SOP 03-3
for which full contractual payment was received. Goodwill was
also adjusted in the third quarter of 2008 for the final
purchase price allocation for the Northwest Suburban acquisition.
|
Goodwill is not amortized but assessed at least annually for
impairment, and any impairment recognized in the period it is
identified. As of September 30, 2008, based upon the
guidelines contained in SFAS No. 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets, it was determined that the
fair value of the Companys assets and liabilities was
lower than amounts recorded in the Companys financial
statements. Accordingly, the Company recognized a goodwill
impairment charge of $80.0 million. Management believes
this impairment was primarily attributable to the weakened
economic conditions at that time as well as lower market
valuations for banking institutions. The method for estimating
the value of the Company included a weighted average of the
discounted cash flows method, the guideline company method, and
the guideline transaction methods. The Company cannot assure
that it will not be required to take goodwill impairment charges
in the future.
Interest-bearing time deposits in denominations of $100,000 and
greater were $874.6 million as of December 31, 2008
and $856.6 million as of December 31, 2007. Interest
expense related to deposits in denominations of $100,000 and
greater was $33.9 million for 2008, $33.8 million for
2007, and $20.5 million for 2006.
F-49
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Certificates of deposit have scheduled maturities for the years
2009 through 2013 and thereafter as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,406,407
|
|
2010
|
|
|
104,617
|
|
2011
|
|
|
38,751
|
|
2012
|
|
|
13,742
|
|
2013
|
|
|
959
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,564,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11
|
Securities
Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
|
The Company has repurchase agreements with brokerage firms,
which are in possession of the underlying securities. The same
securities are returned to the Company at the maturity of the
agreements. The following summarizes certain information
relative to these borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
$
|
297,650
|
|
|
$
|
283,400
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at year end
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
|
4.21
|
%
|
Maximum amount outstanding as of any month end
|
|
$
|
394,764
|
|
|
$
|
317,118
|
|
Average amount outstanding
|
|
|
311,346
|
|
|
|
268,639
|
|
Approximate weighted average rate during the year
|
|
|
4.26
|
%
|
|
|
4.21
|
%
|
At December 31, 2008, securities sold under agreements to
repurchase are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-Sponsored
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities Obligations and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Repurchase
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Original Term
|
|
Liability
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Cost
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Over 3 years
|
|
$
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
$
|
365,449
|
|
|
$
|
368,714
|
|
F-50
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 12
|
Advances
from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2.12
|
%
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3.53
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3.38
|
%
|
|
$
|
380,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, the majority of the Federal Home Loan
Bank advances have various call provisions ranging from three
months to two years. Various securities are pledged as
collateral as discussed in Note 4 Securities.
In addition, the Company has collateralized the advances with a
blanket lien arrangement at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
Note 13
|
Junior
Subordinated Debentures
|
At December 31, 2008, the Company had $60.8 million in
junior subordinated debentures owed to unconsolidated trusts
that were formed to issue trust preferred securities. The trust
preferred securities offerings were pooled private placements
exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to
Section 4(2) thereunder. The Company has provided a full,
irrevocable, and unconditional subordinated guarantee of the
obligations of these trusts under the preferred securities. The
Company is obligated to fund dividends on these securities
before it can pay dividends on shares of its common stock and
preferred stock. The Company is not deemed to have a controlling
financial interest in these variable interest entities, and
therefore is required to deconsolidate them.
The following table details the unconsolidated trusts and their
common and trust preferred securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatory
|
|
Optional
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
Redemption
|
Issuer
|
|
Issue Date
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Date
|
|
Date(1)
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBHI Capital Trust III
|
|
December 19, 2003
|
|
$
|
9,279
|
|
|
$
|
9,279
|
|
|
LIBOR+3.00%
|
|
December 30, 2033
|
|
December 30, 2008
|
MBHI Capital Trust IV
|
|
December 19, 2003
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
LIBOR+2.85%
|
|
January 23, 2034
|
|
January 23, 2009
|
MBHI Capital Trust V
|
|
June 7, 2005
|
|
|
20,619
|
|
|
|
20,619
|
|
|
LIBOR+1.77%
|
|
June 15, 2035
|
|
June 15, 2010
|
Royal Capital Trust I
|
|
April 30, 2004
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
6.62% until July 23,
|
|
July 23, 2034
|
|
July 23, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009; then
LIBOR+2.75%
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accounting adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northwest Suburban Capital Trust I
|
|
May 18, 2004
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
LIBOR+2.70%
|
|
July 23, 2034
|
|
July 23, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,791
|
|
|
$
|
60,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Redeemable at option of the Company.
|
F-51
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company acquired $10.3 million in junior subordinated
debentures at LIBOR plus 2.70% through the acquisition of
Northwest Suburban effective October 1, 2007 and redeemed
$15.5 million in junior subordinated debentures at LIBOR
plus 3.45% on November 7, 2007.
|
|
Note 14
|
Credit
Agreements
|
The Companys credit agreements with a correspondent bank
at December 31, 2008 consisted of a revolving line of
credit, a term note loan, and a subordinated debenture in the
amounts of $8.6 million, $55.0 million, and
$15.0 million, respectively.
The revolving line of credit has a maximum availability of
$25.0 million, $16.4 million available at
December 31, 2008, an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus
155 basis points, and matures on April 3, 2009. During
the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company utilized the proceeds
from a $75.0 million term note loan to pay for the cash
requirements of the Northwest Suburban acquisition. On
March 31, 2008, the Company converted $15.0 million of
this term note into subordinated debt and further reduced the
remaining term note balance to $55.0 million. The resulting
term note had an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus
155 basis points at December 31, 2008 and matures on
September 28, 2010. The subordinated debt had an interest
rate of one-month LIBOR plus 350 basis points at
December 31, 2008, matures on March 31, 2018, and
qualifies as Tier 2 capital.
The revolving line of credit and term note included the
following covenants at December 31, 2008: (1) the Bank
must not have nonperforming loans (loans on nonaccrual status
and 90 days or more past due and troubled-debt restructured
loans) in excess of 3.00% of total loans, (2) the Bank must
report a quarterly profit, excluding charges related to
acquisitions, and (3) the Bank must remain well
capitalized. The Company was in compliance with these debt
covenants at December 31, 2008.
As a result of the effects of recent economic conditions, the
increase in nonperforming assets, and the impairment charges on
goodwill and the FNMA and FHLMC preferred securities, the
Company sought covenant waivers on two occasions since
December 31, 2007. First, the lender waived a covenant
violation in the first quarter of 2008 resulting from the
Companys net loss recognized in that period. Second, the
lender waived a covenant violation in the third quarter of 2008
resulting from the Companys net loss recognized in that
period, contingent upon the Company making accelerated principal
payments under the aforementioned term loan agreement in the
amounts and on or prior to the dates shown below:
July 1, 2009 $5.0 million
October 1, 2009 $5.0 million
January 4, 2010 $5.0 million
Previously, no principal payments were due under the term loan
agreement until the final maturity date of September 28,
2010. The waiver further provides that if the Company raises
$15.0 million in new capital pursuant to an offering of
common or convertible preferred stock, then the Company shall
not be obligated to make any of the accelerated principal
payments specified above that fall due after the date on which
the Company receives such $15.0 million in new capital
until the final maturity date of September 28, 2010. The
Company has the capacity to satisfy all payment obligations
outlined above.
In the event the lender declares the Company to be in default of
any covenants, the Company has 30 days to cure the default,
or the correspondent bank could, at its option, call the term
note and any amounts outstanding on the revolving line of credit
due and payable or increase the rate on those loans by 300 basis
points.
F-52
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 15
|
Preferred
Stock and Warrant
|
Series T
In December 2008, the Company raised
$84.8 million in new equity through an offering of
84,784 shares of Series T fixed rate cumulative
perpetual preferred stock and issued a warrant to purchase
4,282,020 shares of common stock at $2.97 per share to the
U.S. Treasury Department (Treasury) under the
Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) Capital
Purchase Program. The Series T preferred stock has a
cumulative dividend rate of 5.00% per annum of the stated
liquidation preference for five years and increases to 9.00%
thereafter.
The Series T preferred stock qualifies as Tier 1
capital. The Company may redeem the Series T preferred
stock at its liquidation preference ($1,000 per share) plus
accrued and unpaid dividends under the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, subject to the Treasurys
consultation with the Companys appropriate federal
regulator.
Prior to the third anniversary of the Treasurys purchase
of the Series T preferred stock, unless the preferred stock
has been redeemed or the Treasury has transferred all of the
Series T preferred stock to third parties, the consent of
the Treasury will be required for the Company to (i) pay
any dividend on its common stock or (ii) repurchase its
common stock or other equity or capital securities, including
trust preferred securities, other than in connection with
benefit plans consistent with past practice and certain other
circumstances specified in the Purchase Agreement. The
Series T preferred stock will be non-voting except for the
class voting rights on matters that would adversely affect the
rights of the holders of the Series T preferred stock.
Warrant
The warrant has a
10-year
term
and is immediately exercisable upon its issuance, with an
initial per share exercise price of $2.97. The warrant provides
for the adjustment of the exercise price and the number of
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise pursuant to
customary anti-dilution provisions, such as upon stock splits or
distributions of securities or other assets to holders of common
stock, and upon certain issuances of common stock at or below a
specified price relative to the initial exercise price. If the
Company receives aggregate gross cash proceeds of not less than
$84.784 million from qualified equity offerings on or prior
to December 31, 2009, the number of shares of common stock
issuable pursuant to Treasurys exercise of the warrant
will be reduced by one half of the original number of shares,
taking into account all adjustments, underlying the warrant.
Series A
In December 2007, the Company raised
$41.4 million in new equity capital, net of issuance costs,
through an offering of 1,725,000 depositary shares each
representing 1/100th of a share of its Series A
noncumulative redeemable convertible perpetual preferred stock,
at $25.00 per depositary share. The depositary shares have a
dividend rate of 7.75% per annum of the stated liquidation
preference, which is initially equivalent to $1.937500 per year
and $0.484375 per quarter per depositary share. Dividends are
noncumulative and are payable if, when and as declared by the
Companys board of directors.
The depositary shares are convertible, at the option of the
holder, at any time into the number of shares of the
Companys common stock equal to $25.00 divided by the
conversion price then in effect. The depositary shares are
convertible, at the option of the Company, on or after the fifth
anniversary of the issue date, into the number of shares of the
Companys common stock equal to $25.00 divided by the
conversion price then in effect. The current conversion price is
$15.00. The Company may exercise this conversion option only if
its common stock price equals or exceeds 130% of the then
prevailing conversion price for at least 20 trading days in a
period of 30 consecutive trading days and the Company has paid
full dividends on the depositary shares for four consecutive
quarters.
The depositary shares are redeemable, at the option of the
Company, on or after the fifth anniversary of the issue date,
for $25.00 per share, plus declared and unpaid dividends, if
any, provided that the payment of dividends for prior periods
has been approved by the Federal Reserve Board.
F-53
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The preferred stock outstanding has preference over the
Companys common stock with respect to the payment of
dividends and distribution of the Companys assets in the
event of a liquidation or dissolution. The holders of preferred
stock have no voting rights, except in certain circumstances.
|
|
Note 16
|
Capital
Requirements
|
The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital
requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Under
capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action, banks must meet specific capital
guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets,
liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated
under regulatory accounting practices. Prompt corrective action
provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure
capital adequacy require banks and bank holding companies to
maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier 1
capital to risk-weighted assets and Tier 1 capital to
average assets. If a bank does not meet these minimum capital
requirements, as defined, bank regulators can initiate certain
actions that could have a direct material effect on the
banks financial statements. Management believes that, as
of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company and the Bank met
all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.
As of December 31, 2008, the most recent Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation notification categorized the Bank as well
capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action. There are no conditions or events since that
notification that management believes have changed the
institutions categories. To be categorized as well
capitalized, banks must maintain minimum total risk-based,
Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios.
The risk-based capital information for the Company is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
2,878,087
|
|
|
$
|
2,811,423
|
|
Average assets
|
|
|
3,590,313
|
|
|
|
3,721,444
|
|
Capital components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
305,834
|
|
|
$
|
375,164
|
|
Plus: Guaranteed trust preferred securities
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
Less: Core deposit and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
(14,683
|
)
|
|
|
(17,044
|
)
|
Less: Goodwill
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
(160,407
|
)
|
Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(32,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Plus: Unrealized losses on securities, net of tax
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
|
|
13,917
|
|
Less: Unrealized losses on equity securities, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
|
|
(11,768
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital
|
|
|
238,873
|
|
|
|
258,862
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
44,432
|
|
|
|
26,748
|
|
Reserve for unfunded commitments
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Disallowed allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(9,406
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Qualifying subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
289,967
|
|
|
$
|
285,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The actual capital amounts and ratios for the Company and the
Bank are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital
|
|
|
To Be Well
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adequacy Purposes
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
$
|
289,967
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
230,247
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
301,993
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
229,244
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
286,555
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
238,873
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
115,123
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
236,054
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
114,622
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
171,933
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
238,873
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
143,613
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
236,054
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
143,000
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
178,750
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
$
|
285,843
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
224,814
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
351,352
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
223,959
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
279,949
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
258,862
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
112,457
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
324,370
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
111,980
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
167,969
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
258,862
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
148,858
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
324,370
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
148,407
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
185,508
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
Note 17
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurement, on January 1, 2008.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price
that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a
liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous
market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction
between willing market participants on the measurement date.
SFAS No. 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy
which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when
measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of
inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the
entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
|
|
|
|
Level 2:
Significant other observable
inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are
not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
|
|
Level 3:
Significant unobservable inputs
that reflect a companys own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an
asset or liability.
|
The Companys
available-for-sale
investment securities are the only financial assets that are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis; it does not hold
any financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a
recurring basis. The fair values of
available-for-sale
securities are determined by obtaining either quoted prices on
nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix pricing,
which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to
value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted
prices for the specific
F-55
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
securities but rather by relying on these securities
relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. If quoted
prices or matrix pricing are not available, the fair value is
determined by an adjusted price for similar securities including
unobservable inputs. The fair values of the
available-for-sale
securities were measured at December 31, 2008 using the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Quoted Prices or
|
|
Significant
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Identical Assets in
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
at December 31,
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
2008
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
621,949
|
|
|
$
|
930
|
|
|
$
|
612,586
|
|
|
$
|
8,433
|
|
The following is a summary of changes in the fair value of the
available-for-sale
securities that were measured using significant unobservable
inputs for the year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
10,479
|
|
Paydowns received
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(2,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
8,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys impaired loans that are measured using the
fair value of the underlying collateral are measured on a
non-recurring basis. Once a loan is identified as individually
impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with
SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan. At December 31, 2008,
$41.3 million of the total impaired loans were evaluated
based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the
collateral is determined by obtaining an observable market price
or by obtaining an appraised value with management applying
selling and other discounts to the underlying collateral value.
If an appraised value is not available, the fair value of the
impaired loan is determined by an adjusted appraised value
including unobservable cash flows.
At December 31, 2008, the fair values of the impaired loans
based on the fair value of the collateral were measured using
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices or
|
|
Significant
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets in
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
2008
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
37,098
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,098
|
|
Loans which are measured for impairment using the fair value of
collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a gross carrying
amount of $41.3 million, with an associated valuation
allowance of $4.2 million for a fair value of
$37.1 million at December 31, 2008. The provision for
loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2008, included
$39.0 million of specific allowance allocations for
impaired loans.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which
the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction
between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation
sale. The methods and assumptions used to determine fair values
for each class of financial instrument are presented below.
The carrying amount is equivalent to the estimated fair value
for cash and cash equivalents, federal funds purchased, Federal
Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, accrued interest
receivable and payable,
F-56
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
due from and to broker, noninterest-bearing deposits, short-term
borrowings, and variable rate loans, interest-bearing deposits,
or notes payable that reprice frequently and fully. The fair
values of securities are determined by obtaining either quoted
prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or matrix
pricing. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate
loans or deposits with infrequent repricing or repricing limits,
and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, fair value
is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates
applied to the estimated life and credit risk. Fair values for
impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis
or underlying collateral values. The fair value of fixed rate
debt is based on current rates for similar financing. The fair
value of off-balance-sheet items, loan commitments, is not
material.
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial
instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
63,065
|
|
|
$
|
63,065
|
|
|
$
|
84,499
|
|
|
$
|
84,499
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
621,949
|
|
|
|
621,949
|
|
|
|
710,881
|
|
|
|
710,881
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
30,267
|
|
|
|
30,387
|
|
|
|
37,601
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
31,698
|
|
|
|
31,698
|
|
|
|
29,264
|
|
|
|
29,264
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
2,465,327
|
|
|
|
2,485,011
|
|
|
|
2,447,579
|
|
|
|
2,452,466
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
13,302
|
|
|
|
13,302
|
|
|
|
14,519
|
|
|
|
14,519
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
|
334,495
|
|
|
|
334,495
|
|
|
|
321,317
|
|
|
|
321,317
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
2,078,296
|
|
|
|
2,008,100
|
|
|
|
2,136,831
|
|
|
|
2,000,618
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,000
|
|
|
|
81,000
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
369,376
|
|
|
|
283,400
|
|
|
|
305,394
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
380,000
|
|
|
|
410,992
|
|
|
|
323,439
|
|
|
|
339,108
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
|
|
56,572
|
|
|
|
60,724
|
|
|
|
61,154
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
|
|
11,014
|
|
|
|
11,014
|
|
The remaining other assets and liabilities of the Company are
not considered financial instruments and are not included in the
above disclosures.
There is no readily available market for a significant portion
of the Companys financial instruments. Accordingly, fair
values are based on various factors relative to expected loss
experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics,
and other factors. The assumptions and estimates used in the
fair value determination process are subjective in nature and
involve uncertainties and significant judgment and, therefore,
fair values cannot be determined with precision. Changes in
assumptions could significantly affect these estimated values.
F-57
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 18
|
Off-Balance-Sheet
Risk and Concentrations of Credit Risk
|
In the normal course of business and to meet financing needs of
customers, the Company is a party to financial instruments with
off-balance-sheet risk. Since many commitments to extend credit
expire without being used, the amounts below do not necessarily
represent future cash commitments. These financial instruments
include lines of credit, letters of credit, and commitments to
extend credit. These are summarized as of December 31, 2008
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Lines of credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
104,884
|
|
|
$
|
13,098
|
|
|
$
|
5,319
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
123,434
|
|
Consumer real estate
|
|
|
26,757
|
|
|
|
37,496
|
|
|
|
33,252
|
|
|
|
54,481
|
|
|
|
151,986
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
235,855
|
|
|
|
18,364
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
3,238
|
|
|
|
259,222
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
43,934
|
|
|
|
11,602
|
|
|
|
3,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,032
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
68,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments
|
|
$
|
479,643
|
|
|
$
|
80,560
|
|
|
$
|
43,832
|
|
|
$
|
60,072
|
|
|
$
|
664,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, commitments to extend credit included
$26.0 million of fixed rate loan commitments. These
commitments are due to expire within 30 to 90 days of
issuance and have rates ranging from 5.25% to 8.00%.
Substantially all of the unused lines of credit are at
adjustable rates of interest.
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in
various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, any
liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial position
or results of operations.
The Bank leases a portion of its premises. The leases expire in
various years through the year 2029. Future rental commitments
under these noncancelable operating leases for the years 2009
through 2013 and thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,529
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
14,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense included in occupancy and equipment expense was
$2.1 million, $1.3 million, and $1.1 million for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
Occupancy expense has been reduced by $566,000, $494,000, and
$475,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and
2006 due to rental income received on leased premises.
F-58
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 20
|
Stock
Compensation and Restricted Stock Awards
|
Under the Companys Stock and Incentive Plan (the
Plan), officers, directors, and key employees may be
granted incentive stock options to purchase the Companys
common stock at no less than 100% of the market price on the
date the option is granted. Options can be granted to become
exercisable immediately or in installments of 25% a year on each
of the first through the fourth anniversaries of the grant date
or may be issued subject to performance targets. In all cases,
the options have a maximum term of ten years. The Plan also
permits the issuance of nonqualified stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, and restricted stock
units. The Plan authorizes a total of 3,900,000 shares for
issuance. There are 1,881,507 shares remaining for issuance
under the Plan at December 31, 2008. It is the
Companys policy to issue new shares of its common stock in
conjunction with the exercise of stock options or grants of
restricted stock.
During 2008, 16,500 employee stock options were exercised.
Total employee stock options outstanding at December 31,
2008 were 379,371 with exercise prices ranging between $8.83 and
$22.03, with a weighted average exercise price of $14.28, and
expiration dates between 2009 and 2015. No stock options have
been granted since 2005.
Information about option grants follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Value per Share
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
687,942
|
|
|
$
|
13.83
|
|
|
$
|
4.57
|
|
Granted during 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during 2006
|
|
|
(151,894
|
)
|
|
|
13.03
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
Forfeited during 2006
|
|
|
(19,000
|
)
|
|
|
18.46
|
|
|
|
6.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
517,048
|
|
|
|
13.90
|
|
|
|
4.58
|
|
Granted during 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during 2007
|
|
|
(36,443
|
)
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
Forfeited during 2007
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
15.21
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
479,152
|
|
|
|
14.03
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
|
Granted during 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised during 2008
|
|
|
(16,500
|
)
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
|
|
3.01
|
|
Forfeited during 2008
|
|
|
(83,281
|
)
|
|
|
13.56
|
|
|
|
4.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
379,371
|
|
|
|
14.28
|
|
|
|
4.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at year end are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
475,548
|
|
|
$
|
13.45
|
|
2007
|
|
|
451,652
|
|
|
|
13.70
|
|
2008
|
|
|
355,871
|
|
|
|
13.94
|
|
F-59
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Options outstanding at December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Range of Exercise Price
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
$ 8.83-10.59
|
|
|
157,121
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
157,121
|
|
|
$
|
9.66
|
|
$10.75-14.90
|
|
|
93,750
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
|
|
93,750
|
|
|
|
13.71
|
|
$18.34-22.03
|
|
|
128,500
|
|
|
|
5.33
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
20.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at year end
|
|
|
379,371
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
355,871
|
|
|
|
13.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of the
options outstanding and exercisable were $1.8 million and
$1.7 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of
options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006 was $50,000, $116,000, and $647,000, respectively.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment, in the first quarter of 2006 using the modified
prospective application. Employee compensation expense for stock
options previously granted was recorded in the consolidated
income statement based on the grants vesting schedule.
Forfeitures of stock option grants are estimated for those stock
options where the requisite service is not expected to be
rendered. The grant-date fair value for each grant was
calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using
the following weighted-average assumptions as of grant date. The
following table reflects the only grant (those options granted
in 2005) included in employee compensation expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
$
|
5.50
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.05
|
%
|
Expected option life
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
22.06
|
%
|
For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, employee
compensation expense related to stock options was $19,000 and
$22,000, respectively. The total compensation cost related to
nonvested stock options not yet recognized was $13,600 at
December 31, 2008 and the weighted average period over
which this cost is expected to be recognized is 18 months.
Under the Plan, officers, directors, and key employees may also
be granted awards of restricted shares of the Companys
common stock. Holders of restricted shares are entitled to
receive cash dividends paid to the Companys common
stockholders and have the right to vote the restricted shares
prior to vesting. The existing restricted share grants vest over
various time periods not exceeding five years and some may be
accelerated subject to achieving certain performance targets.
Compensation expense for the restricted shares equals the market
price of the related stock at the date of grant and is amortized
on a straight-line basis over the vesting period assuming
certain performance targets are met when applicable. All
restricted shares had a grant-date fair value equal to the
market price of the underlying common stock at date of grant.
F-60
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Information about restricted share grants follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value per Share
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
178,700
|
|
|
$
|
18.97
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
347,179
|
|
|
|
22.61
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(36,000
|
)
|
|
|
18.97
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(9,250
|
)
|
|
|
19.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
480,629
|
|
|
|
21.59
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
59,700
|
|
|
|
14.99
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(84,709
|
)
|
|
|
20.85
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(7,226
|
)
|
|
|
20.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
448,394
|
|
|
|
20.87
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
278,324
|
|
|
|
9.45
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(42,996
|
)
|
|
|
17.77
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(73,821
|
)
|
|
|
16.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
609,901
|
|
|
|
16.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, the
Company recognized $2.9 million, $3.1 million, and
$2.2 million, respectively, in compensation expense related
to the restricted stock grants. The Company realized a tax
benefit of $3,000 and $54,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The total fair
value of shares outstanding was $10.0 million as of
December 31, 2008. The total fair value of shares vested
during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
was $764,000, $1.8 million, and $683,000, respectively. The
total compensation cost related to nonvested restricted shares
not yet recognized was $4.6 million at December 31,
2008 and the weighted average period over which this cost is
expected to be recognized is 37 months.
|
|
Note 21
|
Other
Employee Benefit Plans
|
The Company maintains a 401(k) plan covering substantially all
employees. Eligible employees may elect to make tax deferred
contributions within a specified range of their compensation as
defined in the plan. The Company contributes 1% more than the
employees contribution up to a maximum 5% employer
contribution. Contributions to the plan are expensed currently
and were $1.2 million, $1.1 million, and $812,000 for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively.
The Company and various members of senior management have
entered into a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(SERP). The SERP is an unfunded plan that provides
for guaranteed payments, based on a percentage of the
individuals final salary, for 15 years after
age 65. The benefit amount is reduced if the individual
retires prior to age 65.
Effective April 1, 2008, the SERP agreements with employees
constituted a pension plan under SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions. The
objective of SFAS No. 87 is to recognize the
compensation cost of pension benefits (including prior service
cost) over that employees approximate service period. The
benefit obligation was $6.4 million and $3.5 million
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and is
included in other liabilities. Expense of $1.8 million,
$1.1 million, and $451,000 was recorded for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, and has
been included in salaries and employee benefits expense in the
statements of operations.
F-61
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary of changes in the benefit obligation
for the year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
3,477
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
611
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
224
|
|
Amendment(1)
|
|
|
192
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
776
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
391
|
|
Pre-application of SFAS No. 87 expense
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
6,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects acceleration of benefits to a participant.
|
The following is a summary of the net periodic costs for the
year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
224
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
71
|
|
Amendment
|
|
|
192
|
|
Pre-application of SFAS No. 87 expense
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following are the weighted-average assumptions used to
determine the benefit obligation at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Benefit obligation
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
The Company weighted-average assumptions were determined at
December 31, 2008, the measurement date, based on common
benchmarks used for measuring benefit liabilities, the
Moodys As corporate bond rate and Citigroup pension
liability discount rate.
The Company recognized a $477,000 reduction associated with the
prior service in accumulated other comprehensive income as of
April 1, 2008. The prior service cost amortization expense
for 2008 was $44,000, net of tax; $433,000 was unamortized as of
December 31, 2008. The prior service cost amortization
expense is projected to be $95,000 for 2009. The Company
recognized a $240,000 actuarial loss in accumulated other
comprehensive income as of December 31, 2008.
F-62
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
2010
|
|
|
173
|
|
2011
|
|
|
280
|
|
2012
|
|
|
430
|
|
2013
|
|
|
486
|
|
Years 2014 - 2018
|
|
$
|
4,239
|
|
The Company has purchased life insurance policies on various
members of management. The Company is the beneficiary of these
life insurance policies, which have an aggregate death benefit
of approximately $217.0 million at December 31, 2008.
In addition, the policies had aggregate cash surrender values of
approximately $84.7 million at December 31, 2008 and
$81.2 million at December 31, 2007.
The provision for income taxes from continuing operations
consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(11,316
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,923
|
|
|
$
|
7,307
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(36,756
|
)
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
|
|
(4,846
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(7,001
|
)
|
|
|
(1,580
|
)
|
|
|
(1,039
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(55,073
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,246
|
|
|
$
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-63
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The difference between the provision for income taxes in the
consolidated financial statements and amounts computed by
applying the current federal statutory income tax rate of 35% to
income before income taxes is reconciled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Income taxes computed at the statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(74,671
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,638
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,709
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Tax-exempt interest income on securities and loans
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(771
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1,171
|
)
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
General business credits
|
|
|
(661
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(665
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit due to state
operating loss
|
|
|
(4,419
|
)
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(676
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
Income tax reserve adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(591
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
Life insurance cash surrender value increase, net of premiums
|
|
|
(1,195
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(1,072
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
(838
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
Dividends received deduction
|
|
|
(642
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1,106
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
27,733
|
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuity proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Stock based compensation, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Nondeductible costs and other, net
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
(55,073
|
)
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net deferred tax asset, included in other assets and other
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets,
consisted of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
911
|
|
|
$
|
8,742
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
17,543
|
|
|
|
10,519
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
4,675
|
|
|
|
3,116
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
13,446
|
|
|
|
3,999
|
|
Income from partnerships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Deferred tax credits
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
Nonaccrual loan interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,326
|
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
25,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
64,175
|
|
|
|
29,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
|
|
(1,087
|
)
|
FHLB stock dividends
|
|
|
(1,526
|
)
|
|
|
(1,536
|
)
|
Amortizing intangible assets
|
|
|
(4,729
|
)
|
|
|
(5,960
|
)
|
Loss from partnerships
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(7,679
|
)
|
|
|
(9,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
56,496
|
|
|
$
|
20,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company believes it
is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will be
realized and, therefore, no allowance was considered necessary.
F-64
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized Income
|
|
|
|
Tax Benefits
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,122
|
|
|
$
|
1,238
|
|
Additions based on tax positions taken in current year
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
Additions (reductions) based on tax positions taken in prior
year additions
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
Reductions due to statute of limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at end of period
|
|
$
|
3,261
|
|
|
$
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on
January 1, 2007. The adoption of this standard did not have
an impact on the Companys consolidated financial position
and results of operations. The Company recognizes interest
accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties, if
any, in income tax expense. As of the date of adoption, the
Company had approximately $20,000 of interest accrued for
potential income tax exposures and $526,000 of unrecognized tax
benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax
rate and $429,000 of unrecognized tax benefits that, if
recognized, would not affect the effective tax rate. During the
year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recognized
approximately $20,000 in interest expense. At December 31,
2007, the Company had approximately $40,000 of interest accrued
for potential income tax exposures and $729,000 of unrecognized
tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax
rate. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company
recognized approximately $127,000 in interest expense and
$91,000 of penalty. At December 31, 2008, the Company had
approximately $167,000 of interest and $91,000 of penalty
accrued for potential income tax exposures and $2.1 million
of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect
the effective tax rate.
On January 3, 2003, the Company purchased Big Foot
Financial Corp. As a result of the acquisition, the Company had
various unrecognized tax benefits related to the acquisition.
These unrecognized tax benefits were recognized in the first
quarter of 2007, when the statute of limitations for IRS audit
of the final short period return closed. These unrecognized tax
benefits, totaling $429,000, were credited to a core deposit
intangible created at the acquisition.
The Company is currently being audited by the Illinois
Department of Revenue for the years 2003 through 2005. Thus it
anticipates that it is reasonably possible within twelve months
of December 31, 2008, that significant changes in the
balance of the unrecognized tax benefit of up to
$1.4 million may occur as a result of settlement of the
Illinois income tax audit. The primary issue under exam is fully
reserved for and relates to the exclusion from taxable income of
interest on certain state-qualified U.S. obligations. The
Company does not anticipate any adjustments that would result in
a significant change to its financial position. An IRS audit for
the years 2002 to 2005 was completed during the second quarter
of 2007 and there were no changes made to the reported tax
amounts for those years. Years that remain subject to
examination include Federal from 2006 to present, Illinois from
2003 to present, 2005 to present for Indiana, and 2005 to
present for Federal and Illinois for various acquired entities.
F-65
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 23
|
Earnings
Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(158,273
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,577
|
|
|
$
|
17,746
|
|
Series A preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
3,342
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series T preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series T discount accretion
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(162,001
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,048
|
|
|
$
|
17,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
27,854
|
|
|
|
25,426
|
|
|
|
23,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(5.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
27,854
|
|
|
|
25,426
|
|
|
|
23,348
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
Dilutive effect of restricted stock(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Dilutive effect of warrant(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average common shares
|
|
|
27,854
|
|
|
|
25,580
|
|
|
|
23,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(5.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
No dilutive shares from stock options or restricted stock were
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for
any period there was a loss.
|
|
(2)
|
|
No adjustment for unvested restricted shares was included in the
computation of loss available to common stockholders for any
period there was a loss. See Note 2 New
Accounting Pronouncements.
|
Options to purchase 379,371 shares at a weighted average
exercise price of $14.28 and 117,750 shares at $20.56 were
not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share
for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, because the options exercise price was
greater than the average market price of the common stock and
the options were, therefore, anti-dilutive. The warrant to
purchase 4,282,020 shares at an exercise price of $2.97 was
not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share
because the warrants exercise price was greater than the
average market price of common stock and was, therefore,
anti-dilutive. The dilutive effect of the 609,901 shares of
restricted stock was not included because of the anti-dilutive
effect for the year ended December 31, 2008. Because of the
anti-dilutive effect, the shares that would be issued if the
Series A noncumulative redeemable convertible perpetual
preferred stock were converted are not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007.
F-66
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 24
|
Other
Comprehensive Income
|
Changes in other comprehensive income or loss components and
related taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses on securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
(61,540
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,221
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,063
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) recognized in
income
|
|
|
16,747
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for impairment losses recognized in
income
|
|
|
65,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of unrealized gains on securities transferred from
available-for-sale
to
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
20,299
|
|
|
|
(12,260
|
)
|
|
|
2,209
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
(7,831
|
)
|
|
|
4,616
|
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in fair value of securities classified
as
available-for-sale,
net of income taxes and reclassification adjustments
|
|
|
12,468
|
|
|
|
(7,644
|
)
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
Prior service cost related to benefit obligation
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss related to the projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
(391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net changes in benefit obligation
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
11,795
|
|
|
$
|
(7,644
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-67
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 25
|
Parent
Company Financial Statements
|
The following are condensed balance sheets and statements of
operations and cash flows for the Company, without subsidiaries:
CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
43,469
|
|
|
$
|
2,118
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
358,480
|
|
|
|
501,292
|
|
Loan to subsidiary
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
15,820
|
|
|
|
10,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
447,769
|
|
|
$
|
513,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
$
|
8,600
|
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,791
|
|
|
|
60,724
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,544
|
|
|
|
5,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
141,935
|
|
|
|
138,256
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
305,834
|
|
|
|
375,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
447,769
|
|
|
$
|
513,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
22,311
|
|
|
$
|
4,032
|
|
|
$
|
10,477
|
|
Interest from subsidiaries
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees from subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
240
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(7,519
|
)
|
|
|
(6,645
|
)
|
|
|
(4,741
|
)
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
(8,037
|
)
|
|
|
(3,330
|
)
|
|
|
(5,662
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed
income of subsidiaries
|
|
|
7,823
|
|
|
|
(5,002
|
)
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
7,599
|
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
|
|
3,904
|
|
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(173,695
|
)
|
|
|
20,202
|
|
|
|
12,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(158,273
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,577
|
|
|
$
|
17,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-68
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(158,273
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,577
|
|
|
$
|
17,746
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
|
|
|
173,695
|
|
|
|
(20,202
|
)
|
|
|
(12,528
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Change in other assets
|
|
|
(5,794
|
)
|
|
|
2,971
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
Change in other liabilities
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
(3,766
|
)
|
|
|
3,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
11,676
|
|
|
|
(2,261
|
)
|
|
|
11,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid, net of cash and cash equivalents in acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,557
|
)
|
|
|
(65,286
|
)
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
(17,000
|
)
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Loan advances to subsidiary
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing investing activities
|
|
|
(47,000
|
)
|
|
|
(87,632
|
)
|
|
|
(65,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolving note payable
|
|
|
24,600
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from term note payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on revolving note payable
|
|
|
(18,500
|
)
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on term note payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash common dividends paid
|
|
|
(11,076
|
)
|
|
|
(13,003
|
)
|
|
|
(11,439
|
)
|
Cash preferred dividends paid
|
|
|
(3,342
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock and warrant
|
|
|
84,784
|
|
|
|
41,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,392
|
)
|
|
|
(4,770
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common and treasury stock under stock
option plan
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
76,675
|
|
|
|
(76,720
|
)
|
|
|
(14,226
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
41,351
|
|
|
|
(13,173
|
)
|
|
|
(68,098
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
2,118
|
|
|
|
15,291
|
|
|
|
83,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
43,469
|
|
|
$
|
2,118
|
|
|
$
|
15,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-69
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 26
|
Quarterly
Results of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
Year Ended,
|
|
2008
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
50,795
|
|
|
$
|
47,244
|
|
|
$
|
45,888
|
|
|
$
|
43,734
|
|
|
$
|
187,661
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
28,579
|
|
|
|
24,479
|
|
|
|
23,735
|
|
|
|
23,902
|
|
|
|
100,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
22,216
|
|
|
|
22,765
|
|
|
|
22,153
|
|
|
|
19,832
|
|
|
|
86,966
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
4,415
|
|
|
|
41,950
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
71,765
|
|
Noninterest income (loss)
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
|
|
4,394
|
|
|
|
(60,512
|
)
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
|
|
(50,596
|
)
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
28,609
|
|
|
|
20,368
|
|
|
|
103,296
|
|
|
|
25,678
|
|
|
|
177,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(10,003
|
)
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
|
|
(183,605
|
)
|
|
|
(22,114
|
)
|
|
|
(213,346
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(4,587
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(23,891
|
)
|
|
|
(26,543
|
)
|
|
|
(55,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(5,416
|
)
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
(159,714
|
)
|
|
|
4,429
|
|
|
|
(158,273
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(6,251
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,557
|
|
|
$
|
(160,549
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,138
|
|
|
$
|
(162,001
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(5.82
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
(5.82
|
)
|
Certain infrequent items are reflected in the quarterly results
of 2008. The Company recognized a non-cash, non-operating,
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $47.8 million at September 30,
2008 on certain FNMA and FHLMC preferred equity securities
similar to the impairment charge of $17.6 million taken in
the first quarter of 2008. In September 2008, the Company sold a
portion of its FNMA and FHLMC preferred equity securities
recognizing a $16.7 million loss. The income tax benefits
related to the first and third quarter 2008 losses on FNMA and
FHLMC securities were appropriately recognized as capital losses
in those periods. As a result of subsequent law changes,
$16.6 million in tax benefits were recognized in the fourth
quarter of 2008 for losses reported in the third quarter of 2008.
During the third and fourth quarters of 2008, the Company
recorded $42.0 million and $20.0 million in loan loss
provision, respectively, reflecting managements updated
assessments of impaired loans and concerns about the continued
deterioration of economic conditions. The Company also
recognized an impairment charge of $80.0 million on its
goodwill intangible asset during the third quarter of 2008 based
upon an appraisal by an independent third party. During the
first quarter of 2008, the Company incurred a $7.1 million
loss on the early extinguishment of debt arising from the
prepayment of $130.0 million in FHLB advances and
recognized a $15.2 million gain on the sale of real estate.
F-70
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
Year Ended,
|
|
2007
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
44,766
|
|
|
$
|
46,492
|
|
|
$
|
47,174
|
|
|
$
|
55,437
|
|
|
$
|
193,869
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
25,706
|
|
|
|
26,523
|
|
|
|
26,827
|
|
|
|
32,181
|
|
|
|
111,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
19,060
|
|
|
|
19,969
|
|
|
|
20,347
|
|
|
|
23,256
|
|
|
|
82,632
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
3,720
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
|
|
4,161
|
|
|
|
15,477
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
17,081
|
|
|
|
16,644
|
|
|
|
16,245
|
|
|
|
21,425
|
|
|
|
71,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
5,054
|
|
|
|
6,185
|
|
|
|
6,002
|
|
|
|
4,582
|
|
|
|
21,823
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
5,107
|
|
|
|
4,836
|
|
|
|
4,222
|
|
|
|
18,577
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
4,333
|
|
|
$
|
5,017
|
|
|
$
|
4,751
|
|
|
$
|
3,947
|
|
|
$
|
18,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Earnings per share for the quarters and fiscal years have been
calculated separately. Accordingly, quarterly amounts may not
add to the annual amounts because of differences in the average
common shares outstanding during each period.
|
|
|
Note 27
|
Subsequent
Events
|
As disclosed in Note 13 of the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, the Company
was in violation of covenants under its revolving line of credit
and term note (collectively, the Credit Agreements)
relating to the level of nonperforming loans and the failure to
report a quarterly profit, as of June 30, 2009; did not
make a required $5.0 million principal payment due on
July 1, 2009 under the covenant waiver for the third
quarter of 2008, for which the Company was advised by its Lender
that such noncompliance constituted a continuing event of
default; and did not pay the Lender all of the aggregate
outstanding principal on the revolving line of credit at its
maturity date of July 3, 2009, which constituted an
additional event of default under the Credit Agreements. On
July 3, 2009, the aggregate commitment under the revolving
line of credit was reduced from $15 million to
$8.6 million. The Company also did not make a required
$5.0 million principal payment due on October 1, 2009.
As a result, the Lender possesses certain rights and remedies,
including the ability to demand immediate payment of amounts due
totaling $63.6 million plus accrued interest or foreclose
on the collateral supporting the Credit Agreements, being 100%
of the stock of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiary,
Midwest Bank and Trust Company.
Forbearance Agreement:
On October 22,
2009, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement with its
Lender through March 31, 2010, during which time the
Company will actively pursue completion of its Capital Plan,
discussed below. Management believes that the Forbearance
Agreement provides the Company sufficient time to complete all
major elements of the Capital Plan. During the forbearance
period, the Company is not obligated to make interest and
principal payments in excess of funds held in a deposit security
account (which will be initially funded with $325,000), and
while retaining all rights and remedies within the
F-71
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Credit Agreements, the Lender has agreed not to demand payment
of amounts due or begin foreclosure proceedings in respect of
the collateral, and has agreed to forbear from exercising the
rights and remedies available to it in respect of existing
defaults and future compliance with certain covenants through
March 31, 2010. As part of the Forbearance Agreement, the
Company entered into a Tax Refund Security Agreement under which
it agreed to deliver to the Lender the proceeds received in
connection with an outstanding Federal income tax refund in the
approximate amount of $2.1 million. These proceeds, when
received, will be placed in the deposit security account, and
will be available for interest and principal payments. The
Forbearance Agreement may terminate prior to March 31, 2010
if the Company defaults under any of its representations,
warranties or obligations contained in either the Forbearance
Agreement or Credit Agreements, or the Bank becomes subject to
receivership by the FDIC or the Company becomes subject to other
bankruptcy or insolvency type proceeding.
Capital Plan:
As disclosed in the
Companys
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, on
July 28, 2009, the Company announced that it had developed
a detailed capital plan and timeline for execution (the
Capital Plan). The Capital Plan was adopted in order
to, among other things, improve the Companys common equity
capital and raise additional capital to enable it to better
withstand and respond to adverse market conditions. Management
has completed, or is in the process of completing a number of
significant steps as part of the Capital Plan. Steps already
completed include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Cost reduction initiatives, including a reduction in force of
over 100 employees, completed by September 30, 2009,
salary reductions, suspension of certain benefits, elimination
of discretionary projects and initiatives and an increased focus
on expense control;
|
|
|
|
Retained independent consultants to refine cumulative credit
loss projections through 2010;
|
|
|
|
Engaged investment banking support to assist with the Capital
Plan;
|
Significant elements of the Capital Plan currently underway but
not yet completed include:
|
|
|
|
|
Preparing an offer to holders of the Companys outstanding
Depositary Shares, each representing
1/100th fractional
interest in a share of the Companys Series A
noncumulative redeemable convertible perpetual preferred stock,
to exchange their Depositary Shares for shares of the
Companys common stock;
|
|
|
|
Negotiating with the Companys Lender to restructure
$55.0 million senior debt and $15.0 million
subordinated debt;
|
|
|
|
Filed an application seeking an investment by the
U.S. Treasury pursuant to its Capital Assistance Program
(CAP) that would be used to redeem the
$84.8 million outstanding preferred stock issued to the
U.S. Treasury under its Capital Purchase Program
(CPP) in 2008. The Company would seek to convert the
CAP preferred stock to common stock following issuance of the
CAP preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury (subject to
regulatory approval). A condition precedent to the redemption of
the $84.8 million outstanding preferred stock issued under
the CPP is the payment of the deferred dividends.
|
The Company is pursuing a new common equity raise, the proceeds
of which will be used for general corporate purposes, including
injecting capital into the Bank.
The Companys decision to implement its Capital Plan
reflects the adverse effect of the severe downturn in the
commercial and residential real estate markets on the
Companys financial condition and capital base, as well as
its assessment of current regulatory expectations of adequate
levels of common equity capital. The Company believes the
successful completion of its Capital Plan would substantially
improve its capital position and provides the ability to
restructure or otherwise satisfy all amounts due under the
Credit Agreements; however, no assurances can be made that the
Company will be able to successfully complete all,
F-72
MIDWEST
BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
or any portion of its Capital Plan, or that the Capital Plan
will not be materially modified in the future. If the Company is
not able to successfully complete a substantial portion of its
Capital Plan, its business, and the value of its
stockholders equity, may be materially and adversely
affected, and it will be more difficult for the Company to meet
the capital requirements expected of it by its primary banking
regulators and to renegotiate the Credit Agreements. The
material adverse consequences of not successfully executing the
Capital Plan prior to termination of the forbearance period
include the inability to meet a potential demand for payment by
the Lender under the Credit Agreements at the end of the
forbearance period, and the potential foreclosure on the
underlying collateral.
Regulatory Matters:
The Banks primary
regulators, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the
Illinois, Division of Banking, have recently completed a safety
and soundness examination of the Bank. As a result of that
examination, the Company expects that the Federal Reserve Bank
and the Division of Banking will request that the Bank enter
into a formal supervisory action requiring it to take certain
steps intended to improve its overall condition. Such a
supervisory action could require the Bank, among other things,
to: implement the capital restoration plan described above to
strengthen the Banks capital position; develop a plan to
improve the quality of the Banks loan portfolio by
charging off loans and reducing its position in assets
classified as substandard; develop and implement a
plan to enhance the Banks liquidity position; and enhance
the Banks loan underwriting and workout remediation teams.
The final supervisory action may contain other conditions and
targeted time frames as specified by the regulators.
If the Company or the Bank are unable to comply with the terms
of the anticipated supervisory action or any other applicable
regulations, the Company and the Bank could become subject to
additional, heightened supervisory actions and orders. If our
regulators were to take such additional actions, the Company and
the Bank could become subject to various requirements limiting
the ability to develop new business lines, mandating additional
capital,
and/or
requiring the sale of certain assets and liabilities. Failure of
the Company to meet these conditions could lead to further
enforcement action on behalf of the regulators. The terms of any
such additional regulatory actions, orders or agreements could
have a materially adverse effect on the business of the Bank and
the Company.
F-73
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Midwest Banc
Holdings, Inc.:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. and its
subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible
for these financial statements, for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in Managements Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting (not presented herein) under
Item 9A of the Companys 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial
statements and on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted
our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its accounting for participating
securities in the computation of earnings per share to the
two-class method.
As described in Note 27, on October 22, 2009, the
Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement with its lender as
a result of previous covenant violations and events of default.
In addition, it is expected that the Company will be subject to
formal supervisory action by its primary regulators.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
F-74
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 11, 2009, except with respect to our opinion on the
consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to the
effects of the change in accounting for participating securities
in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class
method discussed in Note 2, as to which the date is
July 31, 2009, and except with respect to our opinion on
the consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to
the subsequent events discussed in Note 27, as to which the
date is October 23, 2009.
F-75
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
501 West North Avenue
Melrose Park, Illinois 60160
VOTE BY INTERNET www.investorvote.com/MBHI
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information.
Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain
your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
OTE BY PHONE 1-800-652-VOTE
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Have your proxy card in hand
when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or
return it to
INSTRUCTIONS
To vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN the proposals, check the appropriate box below and sign, date and
return this proxy card. If no box is marked below with respect to a proposal, and this proxy card
is signed, dated and returned, the undersigned will be deemed voted for the proposal.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE
AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD
PROMPTLY
USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE
|
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND
DATED.
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the following proposals:
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Proposal to approve the number of authorized shares of common stock of
Midwest from 64 million to four billion shares as set forth in
Annex A
to the
proxy statement.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Proposal to (i) effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at
any time prior to December 31, 2010 at one of four reverse split ratios,
1-for-100, 1-for-150, 1-for-200, or 1-for-250, as determined by the board of
directors in its sole discretion and (ii) if and when the reverse stock
split is effected, reduce the number of authorized shares of our common
stock by the reverse split ratio determined by the board of directors
as set
forth in
Annex B
to the proxy statement.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Proposal to eliminate the voting rights of shares of common stock with respect to any amendment to the Certificate
(including any certificate of designation related to any series of preferred stock) that relates solely to the terms of
one or more outstanding series of preferred stock, if such series of preferred stock is entitled to vote, either
separately or together as a class with the holders of one or more
other such series, on such amendment as set forth in
Annex C
to the proxy statement.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Proposal to approve the issuance of shares of
our common stock to the USG upon the conversion of the Senior Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock as described in the proxy statement.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Proposal to eliminate the requirement that:
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o full dividends on all outstanding shares of the Series A Noncumulative Redeemable Convertible Perpetual
Preferred Stock must have been declared and paid or declared and set aside for the then current dividend period before
we may pay any dividend on, make any distributions relating to, or redeem, purchase, acquire or make a liquidation
payment relating to our common stock or any other securities junior to the Series A Preferred Stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o if full dividends are not declared and paid in full on the Series A Preferred Stock, dividends with respect to all
series of stock ranking equally with the Series A Preferred Stock will be declared on a proportional basis, such that no
series is paid a greater percentage of its stated dividend than any other equally ranking series;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o a series of preferred stock ranking equally with the Series A Preferred Stock cannot be issued without the approval of
holders of the Depositary Shares if the certificate of designation for such parity preferred stock will provide that the
dividends on the parity preferred stock will cumulate; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o no dividends shall be paid or declared on any particular series of preferred stock unless dividends are paid or declared
pro rata on all shares of outstanding preferred stock which rank
equally as to dividends with such particular series as set forth in
Annex D
to the proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Proposal to eliminate the right of holders of Series A Preferred Stock to elect two directors if dividends have not
been paid for six quarterly dividend periods, whether or not
consecutive and, as set forth in
Annex E
to the proxy statement.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Proposal to adjourn the special meeting as described in the proxy statement.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as name appears above. When shares are held by joint
tenants, both should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, trustee
or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation please sign in
full corporate name by President or other authorized officer. If a
partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature (Joint Owners)
|
Date
|
|
|
Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
501 West North Avenue
Melrose Park, Illinois 60160
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the proxy statement in connection with the
Common Stock Amendments, the Preferred Stock Amendments and the
Adjournment Proposal and votes FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN, with respect to all of the common
stock of Midwest Inc. held by the undersigned, to the approval of the proposals set forth
herein at the special meeting of the Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc., to be held on _,
_, 2009, at a.m., at .
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Materials for the Proposed Amendments:
Proxy Statement is available at www.investorvote.com/MBHI.
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints ,
___and _, each of them his or her true and
lawful agents and proxies with full power of substitution in
each, to vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN on behalf of all of the
shares I hold as of the record date, in accordance with the
instructions given herein.
You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the
appropriate boxes, SEE REVERSE SIDE, but you need not mark any
boxes if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of
Directors recommendations.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be used in the manner
directed herein. If no direction is made, this proxy will be
used to vote FOR each of the Common Stock Amendments and the
Preferred Stock Amendments and the Adjournment Proposal.
NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears herein. Joint owners
should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as
such.
IF NO BOXES ARE MARKED, THIS PROXY WILL BE USED IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED ON THE
REVERSE SIDE.
CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
|
Midwest Banc Hlds (MM) (NASDAQ:MBHI)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jan 2025 até Fev 2025
Midwest Banc Hlds (MM) (NASDAQ:MBHI)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Fev 2024 até Fev 2025