Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ]
No [X]
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ]
No [X]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ].
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference
in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer or a small. See
definition of “large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
The
aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates on January 22, 2014
(based on the closing stock price on the OTC Bulletin Board) on such date was approximately $7,871,443.
As
of January 22, 2014 the Registrant had the following number of shares of its capital stock outstanding: 36,023,206 shares of Common
Stock and 1 share of Series 1 Preferred Voting Stock, par value $0.0001, representing 13 exchangable shares of the Registrant’s
subsidiary, CardioGenics ExchangeCo Inc., which are exchangeable into 24,176,927 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
This Annual Report
on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“
Securities Act
”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “
Exchange
Act
”). Such statements are based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Any statements contained
herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Words such as “may,”
“will,” “should,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,”
“strategy,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “intends”
and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our discussions relating to our liquidity and capital
resources, our business strategy, our competition, and the future of our market segment, our acquisition of CardioGenics Inc.,
an Ontario Canada corporation
(“CardioGenics”
), among others, contain such statements. Our actual results and
the timing of certain events may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.
Our forward-looking
statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are based on management’s current views and assumptions regarding future events
and speak only as of their dates. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by the federal securities laws. Unless the context
requires otherwise, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” refer to CardioGenics Holdings Inc., our
predecessors and subsidiaries. Our acquisition of CardioGenics as discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is sometimes referred
to as the “CardioGenics Acquisition.”
COMPANY
Overview
Prior to the CardioGenics
Acquisition, our primary business was providing financial and investment information to the investment community which we had
been doing since 1989. In July 2009, we consummated the CardioGenics Acquisition and the main focus of our business was changed
to the development of products targeting the immunoassay segment of the point-of-care in-vitro diagnostic (“IVD”)
testing market. In order to better reflect the new focus of our business, we changed our name to CardioGenics Holdings Inc. in
October 2009.
CardioGenics was
founded in Toronto, Canada in 1997 by Dr. Yahia Gawad to develop technology and products targeting the immunoassay segment of
the IVD testing market. These include:
●
|
|
The
QL Care Analyzer (the
“QLCA”
), a state-of-the-art proprietary Point-of-Care
(
“POC”
) immunoassay analyzer;
|
●
|
|
A
series of immunoassay test products to detect cardiac markers (the
“Cardiovascular
Tests”
); and,
|
●
|
|
Paramagnetic
beads developed through its proprietary method, which improves their light collection
(the
“Beads”
).
|
We are a Nevada
corporation. Our address is 6295 Northam Drive, Unit 8, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4V 1W8, and our telephone number is 905-673-8501.
Our
Industry
CardioGenics IVD POC Testing
Markets
IVD Market
In-vitro diagnostics
(IVD) refers to testing that aims for the identification of disease states outside the body, using samples such as body fluids
(blood, urine) and tissues (biopsies and tissue sections). The IVD is a well established market, offering essential products (tests,
components and machinery) used by physicians and clinical chemistry personnel to assess disease conditions. According to the latest
Enterprise Analysis Corporation report in 2013, the world market for IVD products is estimated at $52.8 Billion in 2012 with an
average growth rate of 8.4% in the last preceding 12 years. Further, the market is expected to grow an average of 5.5% over the
next 5 years. North America, Europe, Africa, Middle East and Japan make up 86% of the total IVD market.
Immunoassay
Market
According
to the report, the 2012 immunoassay testing market still represents the largest segment of the IVD market by revenue amounting
to $13.9 billion. The fastest growing segments of the IVD market are Anatomic Pathology (8.3%), Clinical Molecular (7.2%), Point-of-Care
(7.0%) and Immunoassay (6.7%). The immunoassays field is now mature. Companies continue to develop new immunoassays and immunoassay
instrument platforms to further improve the sensitivity of the assays and expand the potential of immunoassays for the future.
Point-Of-Care
(POC) Testing Market
Point-Of-Care
(POC) testing refers to testing performed outside of a centralized facility, with results available within minutes. POC testing
is divided into personal use tests, such as pregnancy tests, and professional use tests, that are administered in a physician’s
office or hospital emergency ward. Our tests will compete in the professional use testing market sector.
According to the
same Enterprise Analysis Corporation report in 2013, the market for the POC is estimated at $5,346 million with 7% growth over
the prior year. It is anticipated that most of the growth will come from increased use of cardiac markers and new assays for cancer
markers and diabetes markers.
There is a wide
perception that POC tests are more expensive than lab-based tests and that patient test results are lost to the historical record.
There is also the perception that once the patient leaves the acute care area, the baseline POC tests done in that unit are of
little value because the POC testing results do not correlate with lab-based systems.
The impact of
POC testing on improving patients’ care is clear and has been well documented. Further, the impact of POC testing on saving
healthcare resources was also demonstrated by numerous agencies and institutions.
Two critical characteristics are necessary
for POC test products to become more prevalent; POC testing results must correlate with lab results and the POC devices must be
more consistent and robust in delivering those results.
Cardiovascular
Disease Testing Market
Cardiac markers
are proteins released from heart muscle when it is damaged as a result of a heart attack (myocardial infarction), when the blood
supply to part of the heart is interrupted. Physicians use cardiac markers in two ways; to diagnose a cardiac event in a hospital
emergency room or within the hospital or to evaluate a risk of a cardiovascular event occurring. The routine markers of myocardial
infarction – CK-MB, troponin and myoglobin and recently BNP are used in the acute care and tests such as cholesterol are
used to evaluate risk.
Until recently,
Troponin and CK-MB were the lead cardiac markers. Brain Natriuetic Pepetide (BNP) was recently introduced to differentiate between
a myocardial infarction and heart failure. A number of companies are focused on developing new cardiac markers.
According to a
recently published market report, the market for Cardiac POC products is estimated at approximately US$ 2 billion in 2011 and
rose by 9% over the prior year. This was driven by the introduction of new products and increase adoption of POC products by both
healthcare providers and patients. Despite the many positive aspects of POC testing, the report stresses that there are many key
challenges in the marketing of POC products as healthcare providers need evidence that POC diagnostics provide lab-quality results
and benefits, in terms of clinical usefulness, convenience and cost in order to adopt them.
Magnetic
Particles Market
Magnetic particles,
or beads, are widely used as the solid phase for binding tests, both immunoassay and DNA binding. Magnetic beads are important
for automating and simplifying the methods used for isolation and detection of biomolecules in both research and routine clinical
laboratories. Eight of the top ten (10) IVD companies employ magnetic particles in their fully automated analyzers.
An independent
2006 market research report, prepared for CardioGenics by Adventus Research Inc. (the “Adventus Report”) and sponsored
by the National Research Council of Canada (NRC), estimated the market for magnetic beads for immunoassays and molecular diagnostics
to be approximately $900 million (between $833 million and $1.3 billion). This report of market size estimates did not include
magnetic beads produced in-house by some of the IVD test manufacturers or beads produced for research applications. The Adventus
Report was conducted using several methods, including interviews with leading particle-manufacturers and the end-users, published
industry reports and data from leading IVD manufacturers.
As stated in the
Adventus Report, according to Dynal, a leading magnetic beads manufacturer, the largest part of its Molecular Systems’ business
is OEM sales of magnetic beads to IVD companies. Dynal stated that “the IVD market is very large and still growing. Further,
the magnetic bead-based part of this market is growing at an even higher rate per year”. According to Dynal, magnetic beads
are now the gold standard for immunoassay testing, as opposed to older technologies such as microtitre plate based tests. Nucleic
acid testing makes up a smaller portion of the IVD market, but is fast growing (currently USD 2 billion). Magnetic beads are the
most common solid phase employed in this market.
Furthermore, according
to Dynal, as stated in the Adventus Report, end-user business rather than OEM business (referred to as functionalized and naked
beads markets respectively) goes to research and routine laboratories within Genomics, Expression Profiling and Proteomics. The
market size for Genomics, including DNA and RNA extraction and purification products was USD 300 million in 2001. According to
the same Enterprise Analysis Corporation report in 2013 the market size of molecular diagnostics was estimated to be USD 3.8 billion
in 2012.
As stated in the
Adventus Report, according to Gen-Probe, which is a leading DNA clinical testing company, other markets that are employing magnetic
beads as a solid phase are growing also. Magnetic particles are used for Separation of Microorganisms in Food and Water Testing
and also for HLA testing for organ transplantation.
Our
Products
The CardioGenics Products
QL Care
Analyzer
The QLCA represents
a shift in the design of point-of-care (POC) analyzers. The QLCA is a small, portable, stand-alone and completely automated POC
immunoassay analyzer. The QLCA has successfully miniaturized lab. test technology, and combined it with a simplified mechanical
design and proprietary triggering mechanism.
The QLCA uses
a proprietary self-metering cartridge to perform immunoassay tests at the POC. Each cartridge is pre-loaded with our beads, which
have been coated with specific proteins which result in binding the target marker. A few drops of whole blood added to the Cartridge
initiate the binding reaction and the chemiluminescent reaction needed to deliver sensitive and accurate test results. Operation
of the QLCA does not require specialized training and testing can be completed in 15 minutes.
POC immunoassay
analyzers are not new; however, none of the commercial analyzers can replicate the sensitivity and accuracy of a test done in
a medical lab. The QLCA was designed specifically to deliver the required laboratory sensitivity and accuracy. The QLCA employs
chemical light generation or “chemiluminescence”
(“CL”
), the same technology used in the centralized
medical labs. The QLCA uses a patented automated electronic process to trigger CL, which enhances light collection, speeds up
marker binding and increases sensitivity. Further, the QLCA employs several other proprietary technologies to deliver lab-quality
test results.
We have rigorously
tested the QLCA protocols and have compared our test results against medical laboratory test data. Based on these internal test
results, we have consistently met or exceeded the sensitivity standards of medical laboratory immunoassay equipment.
Cardiovascular
Tests
To support the
use of the QLCA, we have developed four immunoassay tests designed to identify cardiac markers in the blood at the time of a heart
attack.
Test
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
Troponin
I (TnI)
|
|
●
|
TnI
testing is the current routine testing for a heart attack.
|
|
|
●
|
TnI
is a heart muscle protein, released in the bloodstream shortly after a heart attack (myocardial infarction or MI).
|
|
|
●
|
Current
laboratory analyzers cannot detect TnI before 4-6 hours after the onset of symptoms, when TnI concentration in the blood
reaches its detection threshold.
|
|
|
●
|
Our test will take only
15 minutes to deliver quantitative results, allowing physicians to obtain much more rapid results and therefore accelerate
patient triage.
|
|
|
|
|
Plasminogen Activator
Inhibitor Type-1 (PAI-1)
|
|
●
|
This
test will help to optimize the performance of a heart drug (
“tPA”
or tissue Plasminogen Activator), a clot buster used as the first line of therapy for
MI patients.
|
|
|
●
|
This
proprietary whole blood test will quantify PAI-1 levels within 15 minutes.
|
|
|
●
|
Forty percent of patients
do not respond to tPA, a fact recognized only after the “golden hour” (the time period in which permanent heart
damage can be prevented) has passed.
|
|
|
|
|
Heart
Failure Risk Stratification (HFRS)
|
|
●
|
We
have discovered a family of related proteins that are released into the bloodstream during
heart failure.
|
|
|
●
|
We
are developing a proprietary test, the Heart Failure Risk Stratification or HFRS test to stratify the risk of death in patients
with heart failure, thus permitting the initiation of appropriate therapy at an early stage.
|
|
|
|
|
Heart
Failure Genomics Risk (HFGR)
|
|
●
|
We
are developing a proprietary HFGR test that predicts the response of heart failure patients
to routinely administered drugs.
|
|
|
●
|
The
need to measure the precise response to these drugs in a timely manner would minimize the trial and error methods now used
by doctors to optimize drugs best suited to each patient.
|
These tests are
designed to be administered during the diagnostic and management process of patients with heart disease. The full scope of our
core technologies, our self metering cartridge as well as the know-how we have developed over the years are covered under our
patent applications.
Currently, our
TnI test product is in pilot testing. Once the pilot testing is concluded, testing for regulatory approval will be initiated.
We expect this testing to be completed during the fiscal year ending October 31, 2014. The filing for U.S. and European regulatory
approval is expected before the end of 2014. Upon receipt of FDA approval, we intend to market the QLCA and the Cardiovascular
Tests through a major IVD distributor. We have initiated preliminary discussions with several of the Tier 1 IVD companies, and
we anticipate that we will commence negotiations with one or more distribution partners before we receive FDA approval
.
In accordance with industry practice, we intend to enter into a license agreement with our distribution partner for the
manufacture and distribution of our products.
Paramagnetic
Beads
Clinical and research
laboratories use paramagnetic particles as a solid surface in heterogeneous immunoassay tests. Paramagnetic (magnetic) beads are
the most common solid phase employed during immunoassays tests in these laboratories. The process of phase separation (separation
of the magnetic beads) is done by application of an electromagnetic field. The majority of centralized laboratory testing involve
the measurement of light generated on the surface of paramagnetic beads coated with biological material as the outcome of the
measurement.
Our Magnetic Beads
represent a significant product advance. Most paramagnetic beads are made of iron oxide, and all are traditionally black or brown.
We have developed proprietary process for plating the beads with a layer of silver, making them white, and more sensitive to light.
Our production process is also significantly less expensive than those used by our competitors. We have internally tested our
Beads against all commercially available beads, and have found our silver-coated Beads to be five times more sensitive than traditional
black or brown magnetic particles. The results of this testing was presented and published in an international conference.
On January 19,
2009 CardioGenics Inc., one of our Canadian subsidiaries, entered into a Supply, Development & Distribution Agreement with
Merck Chimie S.A.S. (“Merck Chimie”) (the “Merck Agreement”), pursuant to which CardioGenics is required
to furnish Merck Chimie with certain quantities of CardioGenics’ proprietary silver-coated paramagnetic beads (the “CardioGenics
Test Samples”), which Merck Chimie is then required to encapsulate, on a test-basis, using Merck Chimie’s proprietary
encapsulation process. After Merck Chimie selects the best encapsulation process, Merck Chimie agreed to then establish the manufacturing
parameters for the final encapsulated beads (the “Merck Encapsulated Beads”) and thereafter scale-up production for
commercial distribution of the Merck Encapsulated Beads. Currently, Merck Chimie has concluded that magnetic beads encapsulated
in CardioGenics meet the product specifications for commercial products. Marketing these magnetic beads has not commenced yet
as both Merck Chemie and Cardiogenics have not agreed on the terms of final agreement.
Pursuant to the
current executed Merck Agreement, Merck Chimie has the exclusive right, for ten (10) years, to distribute the Merck Encapsulated
Beads on a worldwide basis, with CardioGenics receiving 30% of the net sales proceeds of the Merck Encapsulated Beads and Merck
receiving 70% of such net sales proceeds. Merck is responsible for manufacturing and distributing the Merck Encapsulated Beads.
The company is in process of renegotiating the agreement with Merck Chimie in order to ensure sale of product.
Our
Strategy
The success of our business depends
on our ability to obtain the requisite financing and be able to:
|
●
|
complete
the development and testing of our QLCA and our cardiovascular tests;
|
|
●
|
obtain
FDA approval of our QLCA and the cardiovascular tests;
|
|
●
|
develop
further tests that can be run on our QLCA;
|
|
●
|
commercialize
our Beads.
|
We will require
additional funds in order to implement our full business strategy. Accordingly, we will need to raise additional funds through
public or private financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements. We do not anticipate generating any significant revenue
until after the FDA has approved our OLCA and first cardiovascular test and Merck Chimie initiates commercializing our Beads pursuant
to our agreement with them.
Since our strength
is product development and innovation, our strategy is focused on exploiting this strength. In terms of product development and
innovation, we employ our internal resources to develop our products through the various phases of development. We also rely on
external service providers to supplement our internal talents in product development.
We will outsource
product manufacturing. In terms of the QLCA, both the cartridge assembly as well as the analyzer assembly will be contracted out
to different OEM providers with the facilities and expertise to deliver quality products. We will maintain a quality control process
to ensure that the products meet the predetermined specifications.
Product marketing
and distribution will be achieved through partnerships with global companies with wide reach. As we have done with our magnetic
beads, the QLCA will be marketed by a third party through licensing and distribution agreements. Notwithstanding this strategy,
we also intend to evaluate the feasibility of directly marketing our magnetic beads and QLCA to appropriate end-users and may
use such direct marketing efforts to supplement the efforts of our future distribution partner(s).
We are also focusing
on protecting our intellectual property and know how though maintaining a patent filing process on a global basis as well as maintaining
confidentiality agreements with our staff, employees and service providers under contractual agreements.
Although we believe
in these strategies, goals and targets, we cannot guarantee that we will be successful in implementing them or that, even if implemented;
they will be effective in creating a profitable business. In addition, we are dependent on having sufficient cash to carry out
our strategies.
Regulation
CardioGenics
Products
Our QL Analyzer,
Cartridge and Tests are classified as medical devices. Our beads are reagents of medical testing equipment. Accordingly, they
are subject to a number of regulations in the jurisdictions where our products will be sold.
United States
The testing, production
and sale of IVD products are subject to regulation by numerous state and federal government authorities, principally the FDA.
Pursuant to the
U.S.
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
(“FD&C Act”), the FDA regulates the preclinical and clinical
testing, manufacture, labeling, distribution and promotion of medical devices.
Medical devices
are classified into three categories, Class I, Class II or Class III. The classification of a device is based on the level of
control necessary to assure the safety and effectiveness of the device. Generally, the complexity of the submission and the approval
times are based on the regulatory class of the device. Device classification depends on the intended use and also the indications
for use of the device. Classification is also based on the risk the device poses to the patient and/or the user. Class I devices
include devices with the lowest risk, and Class III devices are those with the greatest risk. Class I devices are subject to general
control, Class II devices are subject to general controls and special controls, and Class III devices are subject to general controls
and must receive a Premarket Assessment or PMA by the FDA.
Before some Class
I and most Class II devices can be introduced in the market, either the manufacturer or distributor of the device is required
to follow the pre-market notification process described in section 510(k) of the FD&C Act. A 510(k) is a pre-marketing submission
made to the FDA to demonstrate that the device to be marketed is as safe and effective, and is substantially equivalent to a legally
marketed device. Applicants must compare their 510(k) device to one or more similar devices currently on the US market and support
their claims for substantial equivalency. The FDA requires a rigorous demonstration of substantial equivalency. It generally takes
three to six months from submission to obtain 510(k) clearance. If any device cleared through 510(k) is modified or enhanced,
or if there is a change of use of the device, a new amended 510(k) application must be submitted.
According to FDA
regulations and our management team’s prior experiences with submissions of similar products, our QLCA and launch product
(TnI) will be classified as a Class II device and will be subjected to the 510(K) process. Further, a second test product of ours
(HFRS) will also be subjected to the same 510(K) process. As for both tests, predicate devices are commercially available. For
other test products, depending on the claims and with a prior agreement with the FDA, the submissions would be either a PMA or
510(K). We have not yet approached the FDA for that purpose.
Canada
Health Canada
sets out the requirements governing the sale, importation and advertisement of medical devices. These regulations are intended
to ensure that medical devices distributed in Canada are both safe and effective. We are also required to comply with certain
procedures for the disposal of waste products under the Canadian Code of Practice for the Management of Biological Waste (the
“Code”). We believe we are currently in compliance with all required Code provisions.
Europe
Our products will
be subject to registration under the EU Medical Device Directives for in-vitro diagnostic products.
Other countries
Our products will
be subject to the regulations of any country where they are sold, and we will make the necessary applications for approval on
a country-by-country basis.
Competition
CardioGenics Competitors
Numerous
companies provide Point Of Care (POC) products, many with cardiovascular test offerings. However, in terms of
quantitative
POC products, few companies operate in this space with marketed devices. These include:
●
|
|
Biosite
Diagnostics Incorporated;
|
●
|
|
Response
Biomedicals Corp.;
|
●
|
|
Roche
POC division; and
|
●
|
|
i-Stat
division of Abbott Diagnostics
|
The
first 2 companies employ fluorescence measurements in their platforms whereas Roche employs both Fluorescence and spectroscopic
methods for detection, while i-Stat employs electrochemical testing. We believe that our technology and products in development
will offer superior products to the POC market. None of the above companies offer chemiluminescence in its platform, a technology
that is well-recognized for its superiority as evidenced by its dominance in the laboratory testing market. We believe that harnessing
chemiluminescence in our QLCA will fulfill the clinical demands for fast and accurate quantitative results at patient bedsides.
Research and Development
Our
efforts are focused on the development of our QLCA and our cardiovascular tests and the commercialization of our beads. Over the
years 2013 and 2012 we incurred net expenses of $419,364 and $522,953 respectively on those efforts.
Website Technical Information
Our
CardioGenics website (www.cardiogenics.com) and the website of our wholly owned subsidiary, LuxSpheres (www.luxspheres.com), are
maintained by us internally and are hosted by DreamHost, which has hosting facilities located in Brea, California.
Employees
As of October
31, 2013, we had seven 7 employees,
none of whom have an employment agreement with
the Company.
Acquisition of CardioGenics
On July 31, 2009
we completed the acquisition of CardioGenics by CardioGenics ExchangeCo Inc.
(“ExchangeCo”
), our Ontario, Canada
subsidiary, pursuant to the terms of a Share Purchase Agreement dated May 22, 2009 among ExchangeCo, JAG Media Holdings, Inc.,
CardioGenics and CardioGenics’ principal stockholder, Yahia Gawad (the
“Share Purchase Agreement”
). CardioGenics
is considered the acquirer in the transaction for accounting and financial reporting purposes.
In connection
with the acquisition, ExchangeCo acquired all of the outstanding common shares of CardioGenics (the
“CardioGenics Common
Shares”
), excluding 173,869 CardioGenics Common Shares in the aggregate owned by two (2) minority stockholders of CardioGenics
(the
“Dissenting Stockholders”
), in consideration for the issuance of 422,183,610 shares of our common stock
to the CardioGenics stockholders at the closing, as further described below (the
“Share Consideration”
). On
January 3, 2014 the Dissenting Shareholders elected to exchange their shares in CardioGenics Inc. for 296,538 common shares of
CardioGenics Holdings Inc. which is the same number of shares to which they would have been entitled had they exercised their
option July 31, 2009. In consideration for the surrender of their CardioGenics Common Shares, the CardioGenics stockholders had
the option to receive at the closing their pro-rata allocation of the Share Consideration in the form of (a) our common shares
or (b) “Exchangeable Shares” of ExchangeCo, which are exchangeable into our common shares in accordance with the terms
of a Voting and Exchange Trust Agreement dated July 6, 2009 among JAG Media, ExchangeCo, and WeirFoulds LLP, as trustee and the
rights and preferences of the Exchangeable Shares. Those CardioGenics stockholders who elected to receive directly our common
shares were issued, in the aggregate, 145,528,195 common shares at the closing and those CardioGenics stockholders who elected
to receive Exchangeable Shares were issued 16 Exchangeable Shares at the closing, which are exchangeable at any time into 276,655,415
of our common shares, in the aggregate. The Share Consideration issued at the closing provided the CardioGenics stockholders with
direct and indirect ownership of approximately 85% of our outstanding common stock, on a fully diluted basis.
Immediately prior
to the closing, all CardioGenics debenture holders converted their debentures into CardioGenics Common Shares in accordance with
the terms of their respective debentures, as required by the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement. Accordingly, such former debenture
holders became CardioGenics stockholders for purposes of the acquisition and received their pro-rata allotment of the Share Consideration
in the form of JAG Common Shares and/or Exchangeable Shares at the closing in consideration for the surrender of the CardioGenics
Common Shares they received upon conversion of their debentures.
Also prior to
the closing, CardioGenics closed on an equity investment round of financing totaling $2,715,000. These equity investors in CardioGenics
became CardioGenics stockholders for purposes of the acquisition and received their pro-rata allotment of the Share Consideration
in the form of our common shares.
All of our common
shares received by CardioGenics stockholders in exchange for their CardioGenics Common Shares were not be registered for resale
and, therefore, were subjected to the rights and restrictions of Rule 144. All Exchangeable Shares received by CardioGenics stockholders
in exchange for their CardioGenics Common Shares (and any of our common shares into which such Exchangeable Shares may be exchanged)
also may not be registered for resale prior to six (6) months following the closing and, therefore shall remain subject to the
rights and restrictions of Rule 144 prior to any such registration.
Also at the closing,
all holders of CardioGenics warrants entitling the holders to purchase CardioGenics Common Shares at various prices exchanged
their CardioGenics warrants for warrants to purchase, in the aggregate, 36,148,896 of our common shares at exercise prices of
$0.047 per share, in accordance with the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement and the respective warrants. The terms of these
newly issued warrants did not include any registration rights for the warrant holders. CardioGenics had no options to acquire
CardioGenics Common Shares outstanding as of the closing.
At the closing,
our then current directors resigned as directors of JAG Media and its subsidiaries after appointing their successors and our then
current officers also resigned as officers and executives of JAG Media and its subsidiaries. After their resignation and the closing,
our former directors entered into consulting agreements with the Company pursuant to which they are rendered various services
to assist us in connection with certain transition matters. Each consulting agreement was for a term of 18 months, with each party
receiving 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, issued pursuant to our 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as compensation
for their services under the consulting agreements.
Following the
closing, a majority of our stockholders approved, by written consent, an amendment to our articles of incorporation, which provided
for (a) a change in our corporate name from
“JAG Media Holdings, Inc.”
to
“CardioGenics Holdings Inc.”
and (b) an increase in the number of our authorized JAG Common Shares from 500,000,000 to 650,000,000.
Financing Arrangements
None.
Increase in Authorized Shares
In October 2009
a majority of our stockholders approved, by written consent, an amendment to our articles of incorporation, which provided for,
among other matters, an increase in the number of our authorized shares of common stock from 500,000,000 to 650,000,000. The 650,000,000
authorized shares of our common stock were subsequently reduced to 65,000,000 authorized shares of common stock pursuant to a
reverse stock split implemented by the Company on June 18, 2010, as further described below. On October 17, 2012 a majority of
our stockholders approved an amendment to our articles of incorporation, which provided for, among other matters, an increase
in the number of our authorized shares of common stock from 65,000,000 to 150,000,000. On January 17, 2013 the Company filed a
Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized common shares to 150,000,000
and de-authorize the Company’s Class B common stock.
Reverse Stock Split
As authorized
by our Board of Directors, on June 18, 2010, we filed a “Certificate of Change” with the Nevada Secretary of State’s
Office, which effected a 1:10 share consolidation of our outstanding and authorized shares of common stock. As a result of this
share consolidation, our authorized shares of common stock was reduced from 650,000,000 to 65,000,000 and our outstanding shares
of common stock as of such date were consolidated in accordance with the 1:10 share consolidation ratio.
Facilities
See “Item 2.—Properties.”
Legal Proceedings
See “Item 3.—Legal Proceedings.”
Where You Can Find More Information
About Us
We are required
to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You can read and copy any
of this information at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 on official business
days during the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling
the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. This information is also available from the SEC’s website at
http://www.sec.gov
. We will
also gladly send any filing to you upon your written request to Dr. Yahia Gawad, our Chief Executive Officer, at 6295 Northam
Drive, Unit 8, Mississauga, Ontario L4V 1W8.
ITEM 1A. RISK
FACTORS
Risks Related
to Our Business and Industry
The requirements
of being a public company may strain our resources and distract our management
As a public company,
we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These requirements place a strain
on our systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect
to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures
and internal controls for financial reporting. Management has identified the following material weaknesses in our internal
controls over financial reporting; 1) lack of resources to account for complex and unusual transactions and 2) there is no effective
segregation of duties, which includes monitoring controls, between the members of management.
We are also required
to document and test our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. If we
fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented
or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal
controls over financial reporting in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
In order to maintain
and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, significant
resources and management oversight will be required. This may divert management’s attention from other business concerns,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition,
we may need to hire additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting
knowledge, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so in a timely fashion.
We have
not earned any material revenues in our CardioGenics business unit since its incorporation and only have a limited operating history
in its current business, which raise doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our CardioGenics
business unit has a limited operating history in its current business and must be considered in the development stage. It has
not generated any material revenues since its inception and we will, in all likelihood, continue to incur operating expenses without
significant revenues until we complete development of our Cardiovascular Tests and commercialize our QLCA and the Cardiovascular
Tests. The primary source of funds for our CardioGenics business unit has been the sale of common stock. We cannot assure that
we will be able to generate any significant revenues or income. These circumstances make us dependent on additional financial
support until profitability is achieved. There is no assurance that we will ever be profitable and we have not yet achieved profitable
operations. These factors raise substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.
We need
to raise additional financing to support the research and development of our CardioGenics business but we cannot be sure that
we will be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us when needed. If we are unable to obtain additional financing
to meet our needs, our operations may be adversely affected or terminated.
Our ability to
develop new test products for our QLCA is dependent upon our ability to raise significant additional financing when needed. If
we are unable to obtain such financing, we will not be able to fully develop and commercialize our platform and technology. Our
future capital requirements will depend upon many factors, including:
●
|
|
continued
scientific progress in our research and development programs;
|
●
|
|
cost
and timing of conducting clinical trials and seeking regulatory approvals and patent
prosecutions;
|
●
|
|
competing
technological and market developments;
|
●
|
|
our
ability to establish additional collaborative relationships; and
|
●
|
|
the
effect of commercialization activities and facility expansions if and as required.
|
We have limited
financial resources and to date, no material cash flow from the operations of our CardioGenics business unit and we are dependent
for funds on our ability to sell our common stock, primarily on a private placement basis. There can be no assurance that we will
be able to obtain financing on that basis in light of factors such as the market demand for our securities, the state of financial
markets generally and other relevant factors. Any sale of our common stock in the future will result in dilution to existing stockholders.
Furthermore, there is no assurance that we will not incur debt in the future, that we will have sufficient funds to repay any
future indebtedness or that we will not default on our future debts, jeopardizing our business viability. Finally, we may not
be able to borrow or raise additional capital in the future to meet our needs or to otherwise provide the capital necessary to
continue the development of our technology, which might result in the loss of some or all of your investment in our common stock.
We may acquire
other businesses, license rights to technologies or products, form alliances, or dispose of or spin-off businesses, which could
cause us to incur significant expenses and could negatively affect profitability.
We may pursue
acquisitions, technology licensing arrangements, and strategic alliances, or dispose of or spin-off some of our businesses, as
part of our business strategy. We may not complete these transactions in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, or at all,
and may not realize the expected benefits. If we are successful in making an acquisition, the products and technologies that are
acquired may not be successful or may require significantly greater resources and investments than originally anticipated. We
may not be able to integrate acquisitions successfully into our existing business and could incur or assume significant debt and
unknown or contingent liabilities. We could also experience negative effects on our reported results of operations from acquisition
or disposition-related charges, amortization of expenses related to intangibles and charges for impairment of long-term assets.
The expiration
or loss of patent protection and licenses may affect our future revenues and operating income.
Much of our business
relies on patent and trademark and other intellectual property protection. Although most of the challenges to our intellectual
property would likely come from other businesses, governments may also challenge intellectual property protections. To the extent
our intellectual property is successfully challenged, invalidated, or circumvented or to the extent it does not allow us to compete
effectively, our business will suffer. To the extent that countries do not enforce our intellectual property rights or to the
extent that countries require compulsory licensing of our intellectual property, our future revenues and operating income will
be reduced. Our principal patents and trademarks are described in greater detail in the sections captioned, “Patents, Trademarks,
and Licenses.”
Competitors’
intellectual property may prevent us from selling our products or have a material adverse effect on our future profitability and
financial condition.
Competitors may
claim that one or more of our products infringe upon their intellectual property. Resolving an intellectual property infringement
claim can be costly and time consuming and may require us to enter into license agreements. We cannot guarantee that we would
be able to obtain license agreements on commercially reasonable terms. A successful claim of patent or other intellectual property
infringement could subject us to significant damages or an injunction preventing the manufacture, sale or use of our affected
products. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and financial condition.
We may not
be able to adequately protect our intellectual property
We believe the
patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property we use are important to our business, and any unauthorized use of such
intellectual property by third parties may adversely affect our business and reputation. We rely on the intellectual property
laws and contractual arrangements with our employees, business partners and others to protect such intellectual property rights.
Filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing patents on all of our technologies and products throughout the world would be prohibitively
expensive. Competitors may, without our authorization, use our intellectual property to develop their own competing technologies
and products in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection. These technologies and products may not be covered
by any of our patent claims or other intellectual property rights. Furthermore, the validity, enforceability and scope of protection
of intellectual property in some countries where we may conduct business is uncertain and still evolving, and these laws may not
protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.
Many companies
have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending their intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions.
Many countries, including certain countries in Europe, have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled
to grant licenses to third parties (for example, the patent owner has failed to “work” the invention in that country
or the third party has patented improvements). In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against government
agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish
the value of the patent. Moreover, litigation involving patent or other intellectual property matters in the United States or
in foreign countries may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, which could result in substantial
costs and diversion of our resources, and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject
to numerous governmental regulations and it can be costly to comply with these regulations and to develop compliant products and
processes.
Our products are
subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), and numerous international, federal, and state
authorities. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals to market a medical device can be costly and time-consuming, and approvals
might not be granted for future products, or additional uses of existing products, on a timely basis, if at all. Delays in the
receipt of, or failure to obtain approvals for, future products, or additional uses of existing products, could result in delayed
realization of product revenues, reduction in revenues, and in substantial additional costs. In particular, in the United States
our products are regulated under the 1976 Medical Device Amendments to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, which is administered
by the FDA. We believe that the FDA will classify our products as “Class II” devices, thus requiring us to submit
to the FDA a pre-market notification form or 510(k). The FDA uses the 510(k) to substantiate product claims that are made by medical
device manufacturers prior to marketing. In our 510(k) notification, we must, among other things, establish that the product we
plan to market is “substantially equivalent” to (1) a product that was on the market prior to the adoption of
the 1976 Medical Device Amendment or (2) a product that the FDA has previously cleared.
The FDA review
process of a 510(k) notification can last anywhere from three to six months or even longer, and the FDA must issue a written order
finding “substantial equivalence” before a company can market a medical device. We are currently developing a group
of cardiovascular tests that we will have to clear with the FDA through the 510(k) notification procedures. These test products
are crucial for our success and if we do not receive 510(k) clearance for a particular product, we will not be able to market
these products in the United States, which will have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability and financial condition.
In addition, no
assurance can be given that we will remain in compliance with applicable FDA and other regulatory requirements once clearance
or approval has been obtained for a product. We must incur expense and spend time and effort to ensure compliance with these complex
regulations. Possible regulatory actions could include warning letters, fines, damages, injunctions, civil penalties, recalls,
seizures of our products and criminal prosecution. These actions could result in, among other things: substantial modifications
to our business practices and operations; refunds, recalls, or seizures of our products; a total or partial shutdown of production
while we or our suppliers remedy the alleged violation; the inability to obtain future pre-market clearances or approvals; and,
withdrawals or suspensions of current products from the market. Any of these events could disrupt our business and have a material
adverse effect on our revenues, profitability and financial condition.
Changes
in third-party payor reimbursement regulations can negatively affect our business.
By regulating
the maximum amount of reimbursement they will provide for blood testing services, third-party payors, such as HMOs, pay-per-service
insurance plans, Medicare and Medicaid, can indirectly affect the pricing or the relative attractiveness of our diagnostic products.
For example, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services set the level of reimbursement of fees for blood testing services
for Medicare beneficiaries. If third-party payors decrease the reimbursement amounts for blood testing services, it may decrease
the amount that physicians and hospitals are able to charge patients for such services. Consequently, we would either need to
charge less for our products or incur a reduction in our profit margins. If the government and third-party payors do not provide
for adequate coverage and reimbursement levels to allow health care providers to use our products, the demand for our products
will decrease.
Laws and
regulations affecting government benefit programs could impose new obligations on us, require us to change our business practices,
and restrict our operations in the future.
Our industry is
also subject to various federal, state, and international laws and regulations pertaining to government benefit program reimbursement,
price reporting and regulation, and health care fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback and false claims laws, the Medicaid Rebate
Statute, the Veterans Health Care Act, and individual state laws relating to pricing and sales and marketing practices. Violations
of these laws may be punishable by criminal and/or civil sanctions, including, in some instances, substantial fines, imprisonment,
and exclusion from participation in federal and state health care programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, and Veterans Administration
health programs. These laws and regulations are broad in scope and they are subject to evolving interpretations, which could require
us to incur substantial costs associated with compliance or to alter one or more of our sales or marketing practices. In addition,
violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect
on our revenues, profitability, and financial condition.
Our research
and development efforts may not succeed in developing commercially successful products and technologies, which may cause our revenue
and profitability to decline.
To remain competitive,
we must continue to launch new products and technologies. To accomplish this, we must commit substantial efforts, funds, and other
resources to research and development. A high rate of failure is inherent in the research and development of new products and
technologies. We must make ongoing substantial expenditures without any assurance that its efforts will be commercially successful.
Failure can occur at any point in the process, including after significant funds have been invested.
Promising new
product candidates may fail to reach the market or may only have limited commercial success because of efficacy or safety concerns,
failure to achieve positive clinical outcomes, inability to obtain necessary regulatory approvals, limited scope of approved uses,
excessive costs to manufacture, the failure to establish or maintain intellectual property rights, or infringement of the intellectual
property rights of others. Even if we successfully develop new products or enhancements or new generations of our existing products,
they may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing customer preferences, changing industry standards, or competitors’ innovations.
Innovations may not be accepted quickly in the marketplace because of, among other things, entrenched patterns of clinical practice
or uncertainty over third-party reimbursement. We cannot state with certainty when or whether any of our products under development
will be launched or whether any products will be commercially successful. Failure to launch successful new products or new uses
for existing products may cause our products to become obsolete, causing our revenues and operating results to suffer.
New products
and technological advances by our competitors may negatively affect our results of operations.
Our products face
intense competition from our competitors’ products. Competitors’ products may be safer, more effective, more effectively
marketed or sold, or have lower prices or superior performance features than our products. We cannot predict with certainty the
timing or impact of the introduction of competitors’ products.
We depend
on key members of our management and scientific staff and, if we fail to retain and recruit qualified individuals, our ability
to execute our business strategy and generate sales would be harmed.
We are highly
dependent on the principal members of our management and scientific staff. The loss of any of these key personnel, including in
particular Dr. Yahia Gawad, our Chief Executive Officer, might impede the achievement of our business objectives. We may not be
able to continue to attract and retain skilled and experienced scientific, marketing and manufacturing personnel on acceptable
terms in the future because numerous medical products and other high technology companies compete for the services of these qualified
individuals. We currently do not maintain key man life insurance on any of our employees.
The manufacture
of many of our products is a highly exacting and complex process, and if we or one of our suppliers encounter problems manufacturing
products, our business could suffer.
The manufacture
of many of our products is a highly exacting and complex process, due in part to strict regulatory requirements. Problems may
arise during manufacturing for a variety of reasons, including equipment malfunction, failure to follow specific protocols and
procedures, problems with raw materials, natural disasters, and environmental factors. In addition, we may use single suppliers
for certain products and materials. If problems arise during the production of a batch of product, that batch of product may have
to be discarded. This could, among other things, lead to increased costs, lost revenue, damage to customer relations, time and
expense spent investigating the cause and, depending on the cause, similar losses with respect to other batches or products. If
problems are not discovered before the product is released to the market, recall and product liability costs may also be incurred.
To the extent we or one of our suppliers experience significant manufacturing problems, this could have a material adverse effect
on our revenues and profitability.
Significant
safety issues could arise for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and financial condition.
All medical devices
receive regulatory approval based on data obtained in controlled testing environments of limited duration. Following regulatory
approval, these products will be used over longer periods of time with many patients. If new safety issues arise, we may be required
to change the conditions of use for a product. For example, we may be required to provide additional warnings on a product’s
label or narrow its approved use, either of which could reduce the product’s market acceptance. If serious safety issues
with one of our products arise, sales of the product could be halted by us or by regulatory authorities. Safety issues affecting
suppliers’ or competitors’ products also may reduce the market acceptance of our products.
In addition, in the ordinary course
of business, we may be the subject of product liability claims and lawsuits alleging that our products or the products of other
companies that we promote, or may be incorporated in our products, have resulted or could result in an unsafe condition for or
injury to patients. Product liability claims and lawsuits and safety alerts or product recalls, regardless of their ultimate outcome,
may have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and financial condition, as well as on our ability to attract and
retain customers. Product liability losses are self-insured.
The international
nature of our business subjects us to additional business risks that may cause our revenue and profitability to decline.
Since we intend
to market our products internationally, our business will be subject to risks associated with doing business internationally.
The risks associated with any such operations outside the United States include:
●
|
|
changes
in foreign medical reimbursement policies and programs;
|
●
|
|
multiple
foreign regulatory requirements that are subject to change and that could restrict our
ability to manufacture, market, and sell our products;
|
●
|
|
differing
local product preferences and product requirements;
|
●
|
|
trade
protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;
|
●
|
|
difficulty
in establishing, staffing, and managing foreign operations;
|
●
|
|
differing
labor regulations;
|
●
|
|
potentially
negative consequences from changes in or interpretations of tax laws;
|
●
|
|
political
and economic instability;
|
●
|
|
inflation,
recession and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange and interest rates; and,
|
●
|
|
compulsory
licensing or diminished protection of intellectual property.
|
These risks may,
individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.
Other factors
can have a material adverse effect on our future profitability and financial condition.
Many other
factors can affect our profitability and financial condition, including:
●
|
|
Changes
in or interpretations of laws and regulations including changes in accounting standards,
taxation requirements and environmental laws in domestic or foreign jurisdictions.
|
●
|
|
Changes
in the rate of inflation (including the cost of raw materials, commodities, and supplies),
interest rates and the performance of investments held by us.
|
●
|
|
Changes
in the creditworthiness of counterparties that transact business with or provide services
to us or to our distributors.
|
●
|
|
Changes
in business, economic, and political conditions, including: war, political instability,
terrorist attacks in the U.S. and other parts of the world, the threat of future terrorist
activity in the U.S. and other parts of the world and related military action; natural
disasters; the cost and availability of insurance due to any of the foregoing events;
labor disputes, strikes, slow-downs, or other forms of labor or union activity; and,
pressure from third-party interest groups.
|
●
|
|
Changes
in our business units and investments and changes in the relative and absolute contribution
of each to earnings and cash flow resulting from evolving business strategies, changing
product mix, changes in tax rates both in the U.S. and abroad and opportunities existing
now or in the future.
|
●
|
|
Changes
in the buying patterns of a major distributor, retailer, or wholesale customer resulting
from buyer purchasing decisions, pricing, seasonality, or other factors, or other problems
with licensors, suppliers, distributors, and business partners.
|
●
|
|
Difficulties
related to our information technology systems, any of which could adversely affect business
operations, including any significant breakdown, invasion, destruction, or interruption
of these systems.
|
●
|
|
Changes
in credit markets impacting our ability to obtain financing for our business operations.
|
●
|
|
Legal
difficulties, any of which could preclude or delay commercialization of products or adversely
affect profitability, including claims asserting statutory or regulatory violations,
adverse litigation decisions, and issues regarding compliance with any governmental consent
decree.
|
Risks Related
to Our Capital Structure
Our
stockholders may experience significant dilution from the exercise of warrants to purchase shares of our Common Stock
.
The Company currently
has outstanding warrants to purchase 8,332,500 shares of our Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $0.10 to $1.00 per share.
Accordingly, if such warrants are exercised, in whole or in part, prior to their expiration dates, you may experience substantial
dilution upon exercise of these warrants. In addition, the likelihood of such dilution may be accelerated if the price of our
Common Stock increases to a level greater than the exercise price of these warrants.
Future Issuance
of Our Common Stock Could Dilute Current Stockholder or Adversely Affect the Market.
Future issuances
of our common stock could be at values substantially below the price paid by the current holders of our common stock. In addition,
common stock could be issued to fend off unwanted tender offers or hostile takeovers without further stockholder approval. Sales
of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or even just the prospect of such sales, could depress the prevailing
market price of our common stock and our ability to raise equity capital in the future.
The
market for our common stock is limited
.
Our common stock
is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. Trading activity in our stock has fluctuated and at times been limited. We cannot guarantee
that a consistently active trading market for our stock will continue, especially while we remain on the OTC Bulletin Board.
Shares eligible
for future sale may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
From time to time,
certain of our stockholders may be eligible to sell some or all of their shares of our common stock by means of ordinary brokerage
transactions in the open market pursuant to Rule 144, promulgated under the Securities Act, subject to certain limitations. In
general, pursuant to Rule 144, non-affiliate stockholders may sell freely after six months subject only to the current public
information requirement (which disappears after one year). Affiliates may sell after six months subject to the Rule 144
volume, manner of sale, current public information and notice requirements. The eventual availability for sale of substantial
amounts of our common stock under Rule 144 could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our securities and cause you to
lose most, if not all, of your investment in our business.
We expect volatility in the price
of our common stock, which may subject us to securities litigation and thereby divert our resources which may materially affect
our profitability and results of operations or force us to cease operations.
The market for
our common stock may be characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our
share price will be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. In the past, plaintiffs have often initiated
securities class action litigation against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We
may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and liabilities,
could divert management’s attention and resources, and could ultimately force us to cease operations whereby you could lose
your entire investment.
Because
our common stock currently trades below $5.00 per share and is quoted on the OTCBB, our common stock is considered by the SEC
to be a “penny stock,” which adversely affects our liquidity
.
Our common stock
does not currently qualify for listing on any national securities exchange, and we do not anticipate that it will qualify for
such a listing in the short-term future. If our common stock continues to be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board or is traded on
the Pink Sheets or other over-the-counter markets, and if the trading price of our common stock remains less than $5.00 per share,
our common stock is considered a “penny stock,” and trading in our common stock is subject to the requirements of
Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act. Under this rule, brokers or dealers who recommend low-priced securities to persons other than
established customers and accredited investors must satisfy special sales practice requirements. The broker or dealer must make
an individualized written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written consent prior
to the transaction. SEC regulations also require additional disclosure in connection with any trades involving a penny stock,
including the delivery, prior to any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and its
associated risks. These requirements could severely limit the liquidity of such securities in the secondary market because few
brokers or dealers are likely to undertake these compliance activities. In addition to the applicability of the penny stock rules,
another risk associated with trading in penny stocks may be large price fluctuations.
Our
amended charter contains provisions that may discourage an unaffiliated party to take us over
.
Without further
stockholder action, our Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of additional shares of our common stock as well as preferred
stock with special voting rights by class or with more than one vote per share, to a “white knight” in order to deter
a potential buyer. This might have the effect of preventing or discouraging an attempt by a party unable to obtain the approval
of our Board of Directors to take over or otherwise gain control of us.
Terms of
subsequent financings may adversely impact your investment
.
We may have to
raise equity, debt or preferred stock financing in the future. Your rights and the value of your investment in our Common Shares
could be reduced. For example, if we issue secured debt securities, the holders of the debt would have a claim against our assets
that would be prior to the rights of stockholders until the debt is paid. Interest on these debt securities would increase costs
and negatively impact operating results.
Preferred stock
could be issued in series from time to time with such designations, rights, preferences, and limitations as needed to raise capital.
The terms of preferred stock could be more advantageous to those investors than to the holders of our Common Shares. Our articles
of incorporation do not provide stockholders the pre-emptive right to buy shares from the company. As a result, you will not have
the automatic ability to avoid dilution in your percentage ownership of the company.
Control
of our stock is now held by the former CardioGenics shareholders.
As of January
22, 2014, the prior shareholders of CardioGenics (which includes our current named directors and officers) own, directly or indirectly,
approximately 81.3% of our outstanding common stock. While their percentage would decline over time if, and to the extent, new
shares of our common stock are issued, you should expect these persons to exert continuing influence over all matters requiring
shareholder approval, including the election of directors. You may have little to no practical control over such matters.
It is not
likely that we will pay dividends on the common stock or any other class of stock
We intend to retain
any future earnings for the operation and expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common
stock, or any other class of stock, in the foreseeable future. Stockholders should look solely to appreciation in the market price
of our Common Shares to obtain a return on investment.
Our
stockholders ownership of our common stock may be in doubt due to possible naked short selling of our common stock
.
We believe, but
cannot confirm, that speculators may have engaged in a practice commonly known as a “naked short” sale of our common
stock, which means that certain brokers may be permitting their short selling customers to sell shares of our common stock that
their customers do not own and may have failed to borrow and therefore deliver the shares sold to the purchaser of the shares.
We have from time to time been included by NASDAQ on the Regulation SHO Threshold Security List, which is indicative of a significant
amount of naked shorting in the stock. Because naked shorting may result in an artificial depression of our stock price, our stockholders
could lose all or part of their investment in our common stock. As a result of this naked short selling, there may be a substantial
number of purchasers who believe they are our stockholders, but who in fact would not be stockholders since their brokers may
never have received any shares of our common stock for their account. In addition, investors who believe they are our stockholders
may not have received a stock dividend to which they are entitled or may have been deprived of the right to vote some or all of
their shares.
We are classified
as an “emerging growth company” as well as a “smaller reporting company” and we cannot be certain if the
reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies will make our common stock
less attractive to investors.
We are an “emerging
growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements
that are applicable to other public companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our
periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive
compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We cannot predict if investors
will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock
less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.
Section 107 of
the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided
in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging
growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private
companies.
We could remain
an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year
in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as
defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates
exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, or (iii) the date on which
we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period.
Notwithstanding
the above, we are also currently a smaller reporting company. In the event that we are still considered a smaller reporting company,
at such time we ceased being an emerging growth company, the disclosure we will be required to provide in our SEC filings will
increase, but will still be less than it would be if we were not considered either an emerging growth company or a smaller reporting
company. Specifically, similar to other emerging growth companies, a smaller reporting companies are able to provide simplified
executive compensation disclosures in their filings; are exempt from the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
requiring that independent registered public accounting firms provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting; and have certain other decreased disclosure obligations in their SEC filings. Decreased disclosures
in our SEC filings due to our status as an emerging growth company or a smaller reporting company may make it harder for investors
to analyze our results of operations and financial prospects.
Existing
stockholders could experience substantial dilution upon the issuance of common stock pursuant to the equity line with Dutchess
Opportunity Fund, II, LP.
Our equity line
with Dutchess Opportunity Fund, II, LP (Dutchess) contemplates our issuance of up to $5,000,000 of shares of our common stock
to Dutchess, subject to certain restrictions and obligations. If the terms and conditions of the equity line are satisfied, and
we choose to exercise our put rights to the fullest extent permitted and sell $5,000,000 of shares of our common stock to Dutchess
pursuant to this prospectus, our existing stockholders’ ownership will be diluted by such sales.
Dutchess will pay less than the
then-prevailing market price for our common stock under the equity line.
The common stock
to be issued to Dutchess pursuant to the equity line will be purchased at 95% of the daily volume weighted average price of our
common stock during a five (5) day pricing period beginning on the date of delivery of the put notice under the equity line. Therefore,
Dutchess,
has a financial incentive to sell our common stock upon receiving the shares to realize the profit equal
to the difference between the discounted price paid by Dutchess and the market price. If Dutchess
sells the shares,
the price of our common stock could decrease.
We may not be able to access
sufficient funds under the equity line when needed.
Our ability to
put shares to Dutchess and obtain funds under the equity line is limited by the terms and conditions in the Investment Agreement,
including restrictions on when we may exercise our put rights, restrictions on the amount we may put to Dutchess at any one time,
which is determined in part by the trading volume of our common stock. In addition, we do not expect the equity line to satisfy
all of our funding needs, even if we are able and choose to take full advantage of the equity line. In order for us to access
the equity line with Dutchess, we are first required to register for resale the shares of common stock which may be issued to
Dutchess under the equity line. We have not filed a registration statement in connection with the Dutchess Equity and currently
we do not know when or if such registration will be filed.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
Not Applicable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our executive
and administrative headquarters are currently located at 6295 Northam Drive, Units 7 & 8, and 9 Mississauga, Ontario L4V 1W8
Canada. We rent this space at a cost of US$ 49,639 per year.
The servers for
our websites are housed at separate locations as described above. See
“Item 1.—Business—Website Technical
Information.”
We believe that our facilities are adequate for our current needs and that, if our lease is not renewed
on commercially reasonable terms, we will be able to locate suitable new office space and obtain a suitable replacement for our
executive and administrative headquarters.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On April 22, 2009,
CardioGenics was served with a statement of claim in the Province of Ontario, Canada, from a prior contractor claiming compensation
for wrongful dismissal and ancillary causes of action including payment of monies in realization of his investment in CardioGenics,
with an aggregate claim of $514,000 (the “
Lawsuit
”). On January 3, 2014 the Company settled the Lawsuit for
an amount equal to $10,000 plus 700,000 common shares. At October 31, 2013 the Company accrued a “Settlement of Lawsuit”
expense in the amount of $199,000.
ITEM 4. MINE
SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
October 31, 2013
and 2012
The accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-K and Article 8 of Regulation
S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and include the results of CardioGenics, Inc. and its subsidiaries
and JAG Media Holdings, Inc and its subsidiaries (“JAG Media”) (from July 31, 2009, date of acquisition) which are
collectively referred to as the “Company.”
CardioGenics Inc. (“CardioGenics”)
was incorporated on November 20, 1997 in the Province of Ontario, Canada, and carries on the business of development and commercialization
of diagnostic test products for the In-Vitro Diagnostics testing market. CardioGenics has several test products that are in various
stages of development. In the last quarter of 2011 CardioGenics commenced selling one of these products, but has generated no
significant revenue therefrom.
On July 31, 2009, CardioGenics
acquired the business of JAG Media Holdings, Inc. (“JAG Media”). The business acquired is that of gathering and compiling
financial and investment information from various financial institutions and other Wall Street professionals. Revenues of the
acquired business of JAG media are generated by releasing such financial information to subscribers in a consolidated format on
a timely basis through facsimile transmissions and a web site. Further, software focused on streaming video solutions was acquired
through the acquisition of JAG Media by CardioGenics. Historically, further development of this software had been limited as a
result of JAG Media’s lack of financial resources.
On February 11, 2010,
the Company entered into an LLC Membership Interest Purchase Agreement with Rothcove Partners LLS (“Rothcove”) pursuant
to which the Company sold its interest in JAG Media to Rothcove.
References herein to
CardioGenics common shares has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio of 20.957 established in the Share
Purchase Agreement related to the acquisition of JAG Media.
On October 27, 2009,
the name of the Company was changed from Jag Media Holdings, Inc. to CardioGenics Holdings, Inc.
On April 23, 2010, the
Company’s Board of Directors approved a reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding common shares. The total authorized
shares of common stock was at the same time reduced to 65,000,000. The Board of Directors selected a ratio of one-for-ten and
the reverse stock split was effective on June 20, 2010. Trading of the Company’s common stock on the Over-The-Counter Capital
Market on a split adjusted basis began at the open of trading on June 21, 2010. The reverse stock split affected all shares of
the Company’s common stock, as well as options to purchase the Company’s common stock and other equity incentive awards
and warrants that were outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the reverse stock split. All references to common
shares and per-share data for prior periods have been retroactively restated to reflect the reverse stock split as if it had occurred
at the beginning of the earliest period presented.
On January 17, 2013,
the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized common
shares to 150,000,000 and de-authorize the Company’s Class B common stock.
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October
31, 2013 and 2012
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been prepared using the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable
to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal
course of business.
The Company has incurred
operating losses and has experienced negative cash flows from operations since inception. The Company has a deficit accumulated
at October 31, 2013 of approximately $45 million. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient
to cover its operating costs and to allow it to continue as a going concern. The Company has funded its activities to date almost
exclusively from debt and equity financings. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue
as a going concern.
The Company will continue
to require substantial funds to continue research and development, including preclinical studies and clinical trials of its products,
and to commence sales and marketing efforts, if the FDA and other regulatory approvals are obtained. In order to meet its operating
cash flow requirements Management’s plans include financing activities such as private placements of its common stock and
issuances of convertible debt instruments. Management is also actively pursuing industry collaboration activities including product
licensing and specific project financing.
While the Company believes
it will be successful in obtaining the necessary financing to fund its operations, meet revenue projections and manage costs,
there are no assurances that such additional funding will be achieved and that it will succeed in its future operations. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts
of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.
3.
|
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
|
(a)
|
Principles
of Consolidation
|
The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company and its 100% owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and
balances have been eliminated.
|
(b)
|
Development
Stage Company
|
The accompanying financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the guidance for development stage enterprises.
|
(c)
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
The Company considers
all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
|
(d)
|
Government
Grants and Investment Tax Credits Receivable
|
The Company’s
accounts include claims for investment tax credits relating to scientific research activities of the Company prior to the acquisition
described in Note 1. The qualification and recording of this activity for investment tax credit purposes is established by Canadian
Income Tax authorities when the income tax returns for the period are assessed. The credit has been recognized in the consolidated
statement of operations in the year in which the expenses were incurred.
Subsequent to the acquisition
described in Note 1, the Company no longer qualifies to receive substantial refunds of Investment Tax Credits (“ITCs”)
resulting from scientific research. Currently the majority of ITCs resulting from scientific research are carried forward to a
time when the company becomes tax paying at which time said ITCs are applicable against taxes payable.
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October
31, 2013 and 2012
|
(e)
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property under capital
leases and the related obligation for future lease payments are initially recorded at an amount equal to the lesser of fair value
of the property or equipment and the present value of those lease payments. Property and equipment is depreciated using methods
and rates as follows:
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
20% declining balance
|
Lab Equipment
|
|
20% declining balance
|
Computer Equipment – Hardware
|
|
30% declining balance
|
Computer Equipment – Software
|
|
50% declining balance
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
Straight-line over the lesser of the life of the asset or the life
of the lease
|
Capitalized
patent costs represent legal and application costs incurred to establish patents. Capitalized patent costs are amortized on a
straight line method over the related patent term. As patents are abandoned, the net book value of the patent is written off.
|
(g)
|
Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
|
The
Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets under the guidance of standards for the impairment or disposal of long-lived
assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. For long-lived assets
to be held and used, the Company recognizes an impairment loss only if its carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds its
fair value. The carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows
expected to result from the use and eventual disposal of the asset.
|
(h)
|
Research
and Development Costs
|
Expenditures for research
and development are expensed as incurred and include, among other costs, those related to the production of prototype products,
including payroll costs. Amounts expected to be received from governments under Scientific Research Tax Credit arrangements are
offset against current expenses. The Company recognizes revenue from restricted grants in the period in which the Company has
incurred the expenditures in compliance with the specific restrictions.
The Company utilizes
the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in the authoritative guidance. Under the liability method, deferred
taxes are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities
using tax rates expected to be in effect during the years in which the basis differences reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded
when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As there is no certainty that the Company
will generate taxable income in the foreseeable future to utilize tax losses accumulated to date, no provision for ultimate tax
reduction has been made in these financial statements.
On November 1, 2007,
the Company adopted the guidance issued for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes which provides detailed guidance for the
financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial
statements. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized
upon the adoption of the guidance and in subsequent periods. The Company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties related
to unrecognized tax benefits within operations as income tax expense. Upon adoption, there were no adjustments required.
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October
31, 2013 and 2012
|
(j)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The Company follows
the authoritative guidance for stock-based compensation which requires that new, modified and unvested share-based payment transactions
with employees, such as grants of stock options and restricted stock, be recognized in the financial statements based on their
fair value at the grant date and recognized as compensation expense over their vesting periods. The Company has also considered
the related guidance of the SEC. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options and shares issued as compensation to employees
and directors as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model and restricted stock based on the per share value.
The Company also follows the guidance for equity instruments that are issued to other than employees for acquiring, or in conjunction
with selling, goods or services for equity instruments issued to consultants which provides guidance on transactions in which
(1) the fair value of the equity instruments is more reliably measurable than the fair value of the goods or services received
and (2) the counterparty receives shares of stock, stock options, or other equity instruments in settlement of the entire transaction
or, if the transaction is part cash and part equity instruments, in settlement of the portion of the transaction for which the
equity instruments constitute the consideration. Options issued with a nominal exercise price in exchange for services rendered
were measured at the fair value of the underlying services rendered on the date of grant. The expense was recorded to the consolidated
statements of operations with a corresponding increase in share capital with no additional increase in the number of shares as
they were legally not yet exercised.
|
(k)
|
Net
Loss Per Common Share
|
Basic loss per share
is computed by dividing loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period.
The computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share does not assume conversion, exercise or contingent exercise of securities
that would have an anti-dilutive effect on earnings (loss) per share.
|
(l)
|
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
Other comprehensive
income (loss), which includes only foreign currency translation adjustments, is shown in the consolidated statements of changes
in equity (deficiency).
|
(m)
|
Concentration
of Credit Risk
|
The Company maintains
cash balances, at times, with financial institutions in excess of amounts insured by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation
and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Management monitors the soundness of these institutions and has not experienced
any collection losses with these financial institutions.
The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. By their nature, these estimates are subject to uncertainty and the
effect on the consolidated financial statements of changes in such estimates in future periods could be material.
|
(o)
|
Foreign
Currency Translation
|
The Company maintains
its accounting records for its Canadian operations in Canadian dollars. Transactions in United States dollars (“USD”)
are translated into Canadian dollars at rates in effect at the date of the transaction and gains or losses on such transactions
are recorded at the time of settlement in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company’s
reporting currency is the United States Dollar. Foreign denominated assets and liabilities of the Company are translated into
USD at the prevailing exchange rates in effect at the end of the reporting period, the historical rate for stockholders’
equity (deficiency) and a weighted average of exchange rate in effect during the period for expenses, gains and losses. Adjustments
that arise from translation into the reporting currency are recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) component
of stockholders’ equity (deficiency).
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October
31, 2013 and 2012
|
(p)
|
Financial
Instruments
|
The carrying values
of cash and cash equivalents, other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values due to
their short-term nature. Long-term debt and convertible debentures approximate their fair value based upon recent issuances of
the underlying debt.
Revenue included in
these consolidated financial statements is derived from sales of paramagnetic beads and is recognized on shipment to customers.
|
(r)
|
Effects
of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
In December 2011, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU 2011-11 requires
an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of financial statements to understand
the effect of those arrangements on its financial position, and to allow investors to better compare financial statements prepared
under U.S. GAAP with financial statements prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The new standards
are effective for annual periods beginning January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Retrospective application
is required. The Company will implement the provisions of ASU 2011-11 beginning in fiscal 2014.
In February 2013, the
FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income. ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of other accumulated income by
component. In addition, ASU 2013-02 requires presentation, either on the face of the income statement or in the notes, of significant
amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by respective line items of net income, but only if the amounts
required to be reclassified in their entirety in the same reporting period. For amounts that are not required to be reclassified
in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional details
about those amounts. The amendments in ASU 2013-02 will be effective prospectively for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2012 and interim periods within those annual periods. The accounting update will be applicable to the Company beginning
in the first quarter of fiscal year 2014. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2013-02 to have a material effect on
the consolidated financial statement presentation.
|
(s)
|
Derivative
Instruments
|
The Company’s
derivative liabilities are related to embedded conversion features of the Notes Payable. For derivative instruments that are accounted
for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting
date, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings each reporting period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes model to value
the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates and the value is re-assessed at the end of each reporting
period, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified
in the consolidated balance sheets as current or non-current based on whether or not the net-cash settlement of the derivative
instrument could be required within twelve months of the consolidated balance sheet date.
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October 31, 2013
and 2012
|
(t)
|
Beneficial
Conversion Charge
|
The intrinsic value
of beneficial conversion features arising from the issuance of convertible debentures with conversion rights that are in-the-money
at the commitment date is recorded as debt discount and amortized to interest expense over the term of the debentures. The intrinsic
value of a beneficial conversion feature is determined after initially allocating an appropriate portion of the proceeds received
from the sale of the debentures to any detachable instruments, such as warrants, included in the sale or exchange based on relative
fair values.
4.
|
|
Property
and Equipment
|
The costs and accumulated
depreciation and amortization of property and equipment are summarized as follows:
|
|
October 31
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
$
|
12,120
|
|
|
$
|
12,120
|
|
Lab Equipment
|
|
|
168,481
|
|
|
|
168,328
|
|
Computer Hardware
|
|
|
19,490
|
|
|
|
19,490
|
|
Computer Software
|
|
|
8,433
|
|
|
|
8,433
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
91,269
|
|
|
|
91,269
|
|
Total Property and Equipment
|
|
|
299,793
|
|
|
|
299,640
|
|
Less Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
246,297
|
|
|
|
231,813
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net
|
|
$
|
53,496
|
|
|
$
|
67,827
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense amounted to $14,484 and $18,305 for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The costs and accumulated
amortization of patents are summarized as follows:
|
|
October
31
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents
|
|
$
|
144,022
|
|
|
$
|
128,336
|
|
Less: Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
(25,590
|
)
|
|
|
(18,305
|
)
|
Patents, Net
|
|
$
|
118,432
|
|
|
$
|
110,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Life
|
|
|
17
Years
|
|
|
|
17
Years
|
|
Amortization expense
amounted to $7,285 and $6,882 for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Amortization expense is expected to
be approximately $7,300 per year for the years ended October 31, 2014 through 2017. During the years ended October 31, 2013 and
2012, the Company wrote off approximately $0 and $24,905 of net book value of patents, respectively, for abandoned patents.
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October
31, 2013 and 2012
The amount due to shareholders
is due on demand and carries interest at 10% per annum. On February 27, 2013, the amount due to a shareholder was converted into
Series A Convertible Debenture Units. (See Note 14.)
The Company adopted
the provisions of the guidance for uncertainty in income taxes on November 1, 2007. The guidance clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statement, and prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. It also provides guidance on de-recognition classification, interest and penalties accounting in interim periods disclosure
and transition.
Based on the Company’s
evaluation, management has concluded that there are no significant tax positions requiring recognition in the consolidated financial
statements.
The Company has incurred
losses in Canada since inception which have generated net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes. The net operating
loss carryforwards arising from Canadian sources as of October 31, 2013 were $9,126,000 (2012 - $6,319,184) which will expire
from 2014 through 2033.
All fiscal years except
2013 have been assessed; however, claims relating to research and development credits are open for review for the fiscal years
ended October 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, and July 2009.
As of October 31, 2013
and 2012, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards from US sources of approximately $41,040,000 and $40,713,000, respectively,
available to reduce future Federal taxable income which will expire from 2020 through 2033. With certain exceptions, the Company
is no longer subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2008.
Internal Revenue Code
Section 382 (section “382”) imposes a limitation on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences
an ownership change. In general, an ownership change may occur from certain transactions that increase the ownership of 5% stockholders
in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three year period. If an ownership change occurs, utilization
of the NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation. The annual limitation under section 382 is calculated by multiplying the
value of the stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may
be carried over to later years. The Company has historically been in a loss position and, therefore, the Section 382 limitation
may not be relevant for the current period.
For the years ended
October 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate principally due to the net operating
losses for which no benefit was recorded.
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October
31, 2013 and 2012
As of October 31, 2013
and 2012, the Company’s deferred tax assets consisted of the effects of temporary differences attributable to the following:
|
|
October
31
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
$
|
(18,951
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,600
|
)
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
16,600,883
|
|
|
|
15,589,530
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange
|
|
|
17,861
|
|
|
|
16,601
|
|
Investment tax credits
|
|
|
402,189
|
|
|
|
381,836
|
|
Transitional tax debits
|
|
|
(25,076
|
)
|
|
|
(25,076
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
|
16,976,906
|
|
|
|
15,948,291
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
(16,976,906
|
)
|
|
|
(15,948,291
|
)
|
Net Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
A reconciliation of
the Canadian combined statutory rate to the Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012 is
as follows:
|
|
October
31
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory rate
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
Decrease in income tax rate resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate differences
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Changes in tax rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(18.4
|
)%
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(22.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)%
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
8.
|
|
Accounts
Payable and Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
October
31
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$
|
253,618
|
|
|
$
|
149,258
|
|
Income Tax Reserve
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Research and Development
|
|
|
34,901
|
|
|
|
70,560
|
|
Investor Relations
|
|
|
20,602
|
|
|
|
21,164
|
|
Patent Application Costs
|
|
|
10,430
|
|
|
|
10,736
|
|
Legal Fees
|
|
|
273,731
|
|
|
|
263,702
|
|
Settlement of Lawsuit
|
|
|
199,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accounting Fees
|
|
|
37,833
|
|
|
|
70,715
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,050,115
|
|
|
$
|
786,135
|
|
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October
31, 2013 and 2012
9.
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The Company follows
the guidance for stock-based compensation. Stock-based employee compensation related to stock options for each of the years ended
October 31, 2013 and 2012 amounted to $-0-.
The following is a summary
of the common stock options granted, forfeited or expired and exercised under the Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding – October 31, 2011
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forfeited/expired
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding
– October 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forfeited/expired
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding
– October 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
Options typically vest
immediately at the date of grant. As such, the Company does not have any unvested options or unrecognized compensation expense
at October 31, 2013 and 2012.
The fair value of each
option granted is estimated on grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model which takes into account as of the grant
date the exercise price and expected life of the option, the current price of the underlying stock and its expected volatility,
expected dividends on the stock and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the option. The Company granted no stock options
during the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012.
The following table
summarizes information on stock options outstanding at October 31, 2013:
Options
Outstanding and Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
at
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
October 31, 2013
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
For
the Year Ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Fair Value of Options Granted
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Cash Received for Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The intrinsic value
is calculated as the difference between the market value as of October 31, 2013 and the exercise price of the shares. The market
value as of October 31, 2013 was $0.19 as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board.
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October
31, 2013 and 2012
10.
|
|
Capital
Lease Obligations
|
The Company finances
certain equipment acquisitions through a capital lease agreement that expired in 2013. Future minimum rental payments under capital
leases and related information in years subsequent to October 31, 2013 are presented in the table below:
|
|
October
31
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Total amount payable in equal monthly installments of
$500
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
On November 19, 2012,
the Company entered into an agreement (“Line”) with JMJ Financial (“Lender”) whereby the Company may borrow
up to $350,000 from the Lender in increments of $50,000. The Line is subject to an original issue discount of $50,000. Advances
under the Line (“Notes”) have a maturity date of one year from the date of the advance. If the advance is repaid within
three months the advance is interest free. If not repaid within three months, the advance may not be repaid before maturity and
carries interest at 5%. The Lender has the right at any time to convert all or part of the outstanding principal and accrued interest
(and any other fees) into shares of fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock of the Company at a price equal to the
lesser of $0.23 and 60% of the lowest trade price in the 25 trading days previous to the conversion. Unless agreed in writing
by the parties, at no time will the Lender convert any amount owing under the Line into common stock that would result in the
Lender owing more than 4.99% of the common stock outstanding.
A summary of the Notes
at October 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
|
|
October 31, 2013
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
Convertible Note Payable, due June 27, 2014
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Convertible Note Payable, due September 26, 2014
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Debt Discount – value attributable to conversion feature attached
to notes, net of accumulated amortization of $11,983
|
|
|
(48,017
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11,983
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
11,983
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Long-term portion
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
As described in further
detail in Note 12, “Derivative Liabilities”, the Company determines the fair value of the embedded derivatives and
records them as a discount to the Notes and as a derivative liability. The discount to the Notes is amortized to Loss in Change
in Value of Derivative Liability over the life of the Note or until conversion. The amount charged to Loss in Change in Value
of Derivative Liability for the year was $116,663. Upon conversion of the Notes and related interest and original issue discount
to Common Stock, any remaining unamortized discount is charged to financing expense. During the year ended October 31, 2013, Notes
in the principal amount of $75,000 plus interest and original issue discount totaling $16,882 were exchanged for 919,847 common
shares.
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October
31, 2013 and 2012
12.
|
|
Derivative
Liabilities
|
Convertible notes -
embedded conversion features:
The Notes meet the definition
of a hybrid instrument, as defined in ASC 815. The hybrid instrument is comprised of a i) a debt instrument, as the host contract
and ii) an option to convert the debentures into common stock of the Company, as an embedded derivative. The embedded derivatives
derive their value based on the underlying fair value of the Company’s common stock. The embedded derivatives are not clearly
and closely related to the underlying host debt instrument since the economic characteristics and risk associated with these derivatives
are based on the common stock fair value.
The Company determines
the fair value of the embedded derivatives and records them as a discount to the Notes and a derivative liability. The Company
recognized a derivative liability of $135,000 during the year ended October 31, 2013. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of
the embedded derivative are immediately recognized in earnings and classified as a gain or loss on the embedded derivative financial
instrument in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The Company estimated
the fair value of the embedded derivatives using a Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: conversion price $0.084
per share according to the agreements; risk free interest rate of .11%; expected life of 1 year; expected dividend of zero; a
volatility factor of 170 to 195%, as of October 31, 2013. The expected lives of the instruments are equal to the contractual term
of the conversion option. The expected volatility is based on the historical price volatility of the Company’s common stock.
The risk-free interest rate represents the U.S. Treasury constant maturities rate for the expected life of the related conversion
option. The dividend yield represents anticipated cash dividends to be paid over the expected life of the conversion option.
13.
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
As defined by the Accounting
Standard Codification (ASC), fair value measurements and disclosures establish a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements
based on the type of inputs used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach and cost approach). The
levels of hierarchy are described below:
|
●
|
Level
1: Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities.
|
|
●
|
Level
2: Inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly; these include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities
in active markets, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly-quoted
intervals.
|
|
●
|
Level
3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions, as
there is little, if any, related market activity.
|
The following table
summarizes the financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 31, 2013, segregated by the level
of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Increase
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Reduction)
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets or
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Fair Value
|
Balance
Sheet
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
October 31, 2013
|
|
|
Recorded at
|
Location
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
October 31, 2013
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability on Notes Payable
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
$
|
99,702
|
|
|
$
|
99,702
|
|
$
|
-
|
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October
31, 2013 and 2012
The Company utilizes
the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model to estimate the fair value of the derivative liability associated with the convertible
note obligation. The Company considers them to be Level 3 instruments. The following table shows the weighted average assumptions
the Company used to develop the fair value estimates for the determination of the derivative liability at October 31, 2013:
Fair value
|
|
|
$0.139-.140
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
170-197%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
—
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
.66-.90
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
.11%
|
|
The table below sets
forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liability, or derivative liabilities related
to the senior secured convertible notes and warrants, for the year ended October 31, 2013.
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Additions to derivative instruments
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
116,663
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(151,961
|
)
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
99,702
|
|
In February 2013, a
shareholder loan in the amount of $100,000 was converted on a dollar-for-dollar basis for Series A Convertible Debenture Units
(the “A Units”). Each A Unit includes a debenture having a term of three years, bearing interest at 10%, and a warrant
having a term of three years. The debentures are convertible at any time into common shares of the Company’s stock at a
price of $0.25 per share. The warrants entitle the holder to purchase 2 times the number of common shares of the Company’s
stock allowed in conjunction with the debentures at a price of $0.25 per share at any time up to three years.
In February 2013, loans
from shareholder/directors in the amount of $188,584 were converted on a dollar-for-dollar basis for Series A Convertible Debenture
Units (the “A Units”). Each A Unit includes a debenture having a term of three years, bearing interest at 10%, and
a warrant having a term of three years. The debentures are convertible at any time into common shares of the Company’s stock
at a price of $0.25 per share. The warrants entitle the holder to purchase 2 times the number of common shares of the Company’s
stock allowed in conjunction with the debentures at a price of $0.25 per share at any time up to three years.
In May 2013 the Company
sold Series B Convertible Debenture Units (the “B Units”) in the amount of $500,000. Each B Unit includes a debenture
having a term of three years, bearing interest at 10%, and a warrant having a term of three years. The debentures are convertible
at any time into common shares of the Company’s stock at a price of $0.25 per share. The warrants entitle the holder to
purchase 1.5 times the number of common shares of the Company’s stock allowed in conjunction with the debentures at a price
of $0.15 at any time up to three years.
In June 2013 the Company
sold Series B Convertible Debenture Units (the “B Units”) in the amount of $148,653 to officers and/or directors.
Each B Unit includes a debenture having a term of three years, bearing interest at 10%, and a warrant having a term of three years.
The debentures are convertible at any time into common shares of the Company’s stock at a price of $0.25 per share. The
warrants entitle the holder to purchase 1.5 times the number of common shares of the Company’s stock allowed in conjunction
with the debentures at a price of $0.15 at any time up to three years.
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October 31, 2013
and 2012
The Company allocated
proceeds of $306,900 to the fair value of the warrants using a Black Scholes model with the following assumptions: conversion
price $0.25 or $0.15 per share according to the agreements; risk free interest rate of .18%; expected life of 3 years; expected
dividend of zero; a volatility factor of 176 to 195%, as of October 31, 2013 and the remaining $343,996 to the fair value of the
Series B Convertible Debentures. Based on the excess of the aggregate fair value of the common shares that would have been issued
if the Series B Convertible Debentures had been converted immediately over the proceeds allocated to the Series B Convertible
Debentures, the investors received a beneficial conversion feature that had an aggregate intrinsic value of $343,996 as of the
commitment date. Accordingly, the Company recorded an increase in additional paid-in capital and debt discount of $650,896 in
connection with the issuance of the Series B Convertible Debentures and warrants.
A summary of the Debentures
at October 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
|
|
October
31, 2013
|
|
|
October
31, 2012
|
|
Series A Convertible Debentures Payable, interest at
10% per annum to maturity at February 27, 2016
|
|
$
|
288,584
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Series B Convertible Debentures Payable, interest at 10% per annum
to maturity at May 31, 2016
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Series B Convertible Debentures Payable, interest at 10% per annum
to maturity at June 3, 2016
|
|
|
148,653
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Debt Discount
|
|
|
(634,047
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
303,190
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Long-term portion
|
|
$
|
303,190
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Debt discount is amortized
to Interest Expense over the life of the Debentures. The amount amortized to Interest Expense for the year ended October 31, 2013
was $112,609.
Equity Instruments
Issued for Services Rendered
During the years ended
October 31, 2000 through 2006, CardioGenics Inc. issued stock options with a nominal exercise price in exchange for services rendered
to CardioGenics Inc. The fair value of each stock option was measured at the fair value of the underlying services on the date
of grant. The fair value of each grant was charged to the related expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company assumed
options outstanding at JAG Media entitling the employees to purchase 75,000 common shares of the Company’s stock at a price
of $0.20 per share to August 31, 2011. The Company issued options to employees entitling the employees to purchase 200,000 common
shares of the Company’s stock at a price of $3.40 per share to July 31, 2019, based upon change of control provisions in
their employment agreements. All these options were immediately vested. The fair value of the 275,000 options was included in
the purchase price. During 2011, these options were re-priced at $0.01 per share and subsequently exercised.
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October 31, 2013
and 2012
On August 1, 2009, the
Company issued options to a consultant entitling the consultant to purchase 30,000 common shares of the Company’s stock
at a price of $0.90 per share to July 31, 2019. These options were immediately vested.
|
|
October
31,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding warrants are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued to consultant August 1, 2009, entitling
the holder to purchase 1 common share in the company at an exercise price of $0.90 per common share up to and including July
31, 2017
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
287,085
|
|
Issued to Flow Capital Advisors Inc. on settlement of lawsuit
in August 2011, entitling the holder to purchase 1 common share in the Company at an exercise price of $0.30 per common share
up to and including August 23, 2016
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Issued to Flow Capital Advisors Inc. on settlement of lawsuit
August 2011, entitling the holder to purchase 1 common share in the Company at an exercise price of $0.50 per common share
up to and including August 23, 2016
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Issued to Flow Capital Advisors Inc. on settlement of lawsuit
August 2011, entitling the holder to purchase 1 common share in the Company at an exercise price of $0.75 per common share
up to and including August 23, 2016
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Issued to Flow Capital Advisors Inc. on settlement of lawsuit
August 2011, entitling the holder to purchase 1 common share in the Company at an exercise price of $1.00 per common share
up to and including August 23, 2016
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Issued to Flow Capital Advisors Inc. on settlement of lawsuit
August 2011, entitling the holder to purchase 1 common share in the Company at an exercise price of $0.75 per common share
up to and including August 23, 2016
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Issued to consultants in September 2011 entitling the holders
to purchase 1 common share in the Company at an exercise price of $0.10 per common share up to and including March 20, 2013
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Issued to consultants in September 2011 entitling the holders
to purchase 1 common share in the Company at an exercise price of $0.34 per common share up to and including March 20, 2013
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
Issued to consultants in September 2011 entitling the holders
to purchase 1 common share in the Company at an exercise price of $0.50 per common share up to and including March 20, 2013
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Issued to debenture holders February 2013 entitling the
holders to purchase 1 common share in the Company at an exercise price of $0.25 per common share up to and including February
27, 2016
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issued to debenture holders May 2013 entitling the holders
to purchase 1 common share in the Company at an exercise price of $0.15 per common share up to and including June 3, 2016
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issued to debenture holders June 2013 entitling the holders
to purchase 1 common share in the Company at an exercise price of $0.15 per common share up to and including June 3, 2016
|
|
|
232,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issued to consultants August 5, 2013, entitling the holders
to purchase 2,500,000 common shares in the company at an exercise price of $0.15 per common share up to and including August
4, 2023
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issued to consultants August 5, 2013, entitling the holders
to purchase 1,500,000 common shares in the company at an exercise price of $0.10 per common share up to and including August
4, 2023
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issued to consultant September 3, 2013, entitling the holder
to purchase 500,000 common shares in the company at an exercise price of $0.50 per common share up to and including July 31,
2018
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issued to shareholder October 29, 2013, entitling the
holder to purchase 250,000 common shares in the company at an exercise price of $0.15 per common share up to and including
October 29, 2016
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Warrants outstanding
|
|
|
8,332,500
|
|
|
|
6,287,085
|
|
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October 31, 2013
and 2012
16
.
|
|
Authorized Share Capital
|
On September 30, 2009,
the Company’s articles of incorporation were amended to increase the total number of common shares authorized for issuance
from 500,000,000 shares to 650,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.00001 per share. On April 23, 2010, the Company’s
Board of Directors approved a reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding common shares. The total authorized shares was
at the same time reduced to 65,000,000. The Board of Directors selected a ratio of one-for-ten and the reverse split was effective
June 20, 2010. As a result, the total number of shares of all classes of capital stock authorized for issuance by the Company
decreased from 700,440,000 shares to 70,044,000 shares with a par value of $.00001 per share, of which 5,000,000 shares are authorized
for issuance as preferred stock, 65,000,000 shares are authorized for issuance as common stock, 40,000 shares are authorized for
issuance as Series 2 Class B common stock and 4,000 shares are authorized for issuance as Series 3 Class B common stock. On January
17, 2013 the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized
common shares to 150,000,000 and de-authorize the Company’s Class B common stock.
17.
|
|
Issuance
of Common Stock
|
During the year ended
October 31, 2013 and 2012 the Company issued the following common shares:
|
|
Year
Ended October 31, 2013
|
|
|
Year
Ended October 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
#
of shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
#
of shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Issuance to third parties for services rendered
|
|
|
907,582
|
|
|
$
|
257,025
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Issuance to third parties for cash
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
$
|
262,500
|
|
Issuance to third parties on exercise of conversion of notes payable
|
|
|
919,847
|
|
|
$
|
91,882
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The fair value of shares
issued for services rendered were measured at the fair value of the services rendered on the date rendered.
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October 31, 2013
and 2012
18.
|
|
Redemption
of Class B Common Stock
|
On or about February
28, 2011 CardioGenics Holdings Inc. (“Holdings”) mailed notices to the holders of its outstanding Series 2 Class B
Common Stock (the “Series 2 Shares”) and Series 3 Class B Common Stock (the “Series 3 Shares”), which
notify such stockholders that Holdings has elected to redeem all outstanding Series 2 Shares and Series 3 Shares in accordance
with their terms. The Redemption Date is April 4, 2011 and the Redemption Price is par value, $0.00001 per share.
Holdings has established
a trust account with TD Bank Canada, which account will hold proceeds sufficient to redeem the issued and outstanding Series 2
Shares and Series 3 Shares. Accordingly, notwithstanding that any certificate for Series 2 Shares or Series 3 Shares called for
redemption shall not have been surrendered for cancellation, all Series 2 Shares and Series 3 Shares called for redemption shall
no longer be deemed outstanding, and all rights with respect to such Series 2 Shares and Series 3 Shares shall forthwith on the
Redemption Date cease and terminate, except only the right of the holders thereof to receive the pro-rata amount payable of the
Series 2 Shares and Series 3 Shares, without interest.
On September 27, 2013,
CardioGenics Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) entered into an investment agreement (the “Investment Agreement”)
with Dutchess Opportunity Fund, II, LP (the “Investor”), whereby the Company may sell, and the Investor is obligated
to purchase, up to $5 million (the “Put Offering”) of the Company’s common, par value $0.00001 per share (the
“Common Stock”). The purchase price of any shares of Common Stock sold pursuant to the Put Offering shall be determined
by the lowest daily volume weighted average price during the applicable pricing period. Any shares of Common Stock sold in the
Put Offering will be sold pursuant to a registration statement to be filed by the Company pursuant to the terms of a registration
rights agreement (as defined below). Any shares of Common Stock sold pursuant to the Put Offering will be sold directly to the
Investor without a placement agent, underwriter, broker or dealer.
The following table
sets forth the computation of weighted-average shares outstanding for calculating basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
Years
Ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares - basic
|
|
|
57,171,924
|
|
|
|
55,629,034
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Weighted-average shares - diluted
|
|
|
57,171,924
|
|
|
|
55,629,034
|
|
Basic earnings per share
(“EPS”) and diluted EPS for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012 have been computed by dividing the net loss
available to common stockholders for each respective period by the weighted average shares outstanding during that period. All
outstanding options, warrants and shares to be issued upon the exercise of the outstanding options and warrants and conversion
of debt representing 12,896,786 and 6,317,085 incremental shares, respectively, have been excluded from the years ended October
31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, computation of diluted EPS as they are antidilutive given the net losses generated.
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October
31, 2013 and 2012
21.
|
|
Commitments
and Contingent Liabilities
|
Lease
The Company has entered
into an operating lease agreement for the use of operating space.
Aggregate minimum annual
lease commitments of the Company under the non-cancelable operating lease as of October 31, 2013 are as follows. (The Company
is required in addition to pay a proportionate share of building operational expenses.) :
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
49,639
|
|
2015
|
|
|
49,891
|
|
2016
|
|
|
51,152
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
42,627
|
|
Total
Minimum Lease Payments
|
|
$
|
193,309
|
|
Lease expense amounted
to $60,513 and $76,602 for the years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The preceding data reflects
existing leases and does not include replacements upon their expiration. In the normal course of business, operating leases are
generally renewed or replaced by other leases.
Lawsuit
On April 22, 2009, the
Company was served with a statement of claim from a former employee claiming compensation for wrongful dismissal and ancillary
causes of action including payment of monies in realization of his investment in the Company, with an aggregate claim of $514,000.
The suit was settled subsequent to October 31, 2013 (see Note 23).
22.
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
October
31,
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
28,116
|
|
|
$
|
18,221
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of shareholder loan and accrued expenses to debentures
|
|
|
255,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Conversion of notes payable including principle, interest
and original issue discount
|
|
|
91,882
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Value of beneficial conversion feature and warrants issued
with debentures issued
during the year
|
|
|
746,656
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
CardioGenics Holdings Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
October 31, 2013
and 2012
|
a)
|
Issuance
of Common Shares
|
On November 15, 2013,
the Company issued 200,000 common shares at a price of $0.25 per share for cash consideration of $50,000. The investor also received
warrants entitling the shareholder to purchase 125,000 common shares at a price of $0.15 per share for a term of three (3) years.
On January 3, 2014,
the Company settled a suit from a former employee who claimed compensation for wrongful dismissal and ancillary causes of action
including payment of monies in realization of his investment in the Company for an amount equal to $10,000 plus 700,000 common
shares. At October 31, 2013 the Company accrued a Settlement of Lawsuit expense in the amount of $199,000.
|
c)
|
Non-controlling
Interest
|
On January 3, 2014,
shareholders of Cardiogenics Inc. that had at July 31, 2009 opted not to exchange their shares in Cardiogenics Inc. for shares
in Cardiogenics Holdings Inc. elected to exchange their shares in Cardiogenics Inc. for 296,538 common shares of Cardiogenics
Holdings Inc. which is the same number of shares to which they would have been entitled had they exercised their option July 31,
2009.