The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 1 - BUSINESS
Overview
Environmental Quality Management, Inc. (“EQ”),
an Ohio corporation, was formed on September 24, 1990 under the name “Professional Environmental Quality, Inc.” and
changed its name to “Environmental Quality Management, Inc.” on September 26, 1990. On February 7, 2011, EQ consummated
a “reverse business combination” transaction with Beacon Energy Holdings, Inc. (“Beacon”), a Delaware
corporation, and Beacon Acquisition, Inc. (“Acquisition Sub”), an Ohio corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Beacon. EQ merged with and into Acquisition Sub with the result that, on February 7, 2011, EQ became a subsidiary of Beacon (the
“Beacon Merger”). Following the Beacon Merger, the former stockholders of EQ owned 78% of the merged company and the
former stockholders of Beacon owned 22% of the merged company.
Following the Beacon Merger, Beacon changed its name to “EQM
Technologies & Energy, Inc.”, which together with its subsidiaries is referred to herein as the “Company”
or “EQM”. As a result of the Beacon Merger, EQ’s former stockholders acquired a majority of EQM’s common
stock and EQ’s officers and directors became the officers and directors of EQM. For accounting purposes, the Beacon Merger
has been treated as an acquisition of Beacon by EQ, whereby EQ was deemed to be the accounting acquirer. The historical condensed
consolidated financial statements prior to February 7, 2011 are those of EQ. In connection with the Beacon Merger, EQ has restated
its statements of stockholders’ equity and redeemed preferred stock on a recapitalization basis so that all equity accounts
are now presented as if the recapitalization had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented.
EQM’s common stock is quoted on the OTCQB Marketplace
under the symbol “EQTE”.
The Company is a leading full service provider of environmental
consulting, engineering, program management, clean technology, remediation and construction management and technical services
to government and commercial business. The Company’s solutions span the entire life cycle of consulting and engineering
projects and are designed to help public and private sector organizations manage and control their environmental risks
and comply with regulatory requirements. The Company has longstanding relationships and multi-year contracts with numerous
federal agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”), the U.S. Department of Defense and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as well as private sector clients across numerous industries. The Company’s focus areas include
air and emissions, water and wastewater, industrial hygiene and safety, and emergency response and hazardous waste site cleanup.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2014, the Company’s
cash on hand was $917,155. The Company incurred a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $1,295,155 for the three months
ended March 31, 2014. At March 31, 2014, the Company’s accumulated deficit was $10,110,029 and it had total equity of $970,142.
The Company has historically met its liquidity requirements through the sale of equity and debt securities, operations and its
revolving credit facility.
During three months ended March 31, 2014, cash flows provided by operating activities were $812,278, consisting
primarily of a decrease in accounts receivable of $3,092,413, partially offset by a net loss of $1,299,703 and a decrease in accounts
payable and accrued expenses of $2,072,223.
During three months ended March 31, 2014, cash flows provided
by investing activities were $1,241,808, consisting primarily of $1,245,542 that the Company received in January 2014 as contingent
consideration in connection with sale of its biodiesel production facility and related assets in January 2013 related to the reinstatement
of the federal biodiesel blender’s tax credit with respect to the year 2012.
During three months ended March 31, 2014, cash flows used in
financing activities were $3,511,292, consisting primarily of $3,445,733 of net repayments to the Company’s revolving credit
facility and $60,624 paid for debt financing costs.
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 1 – BUSINESS, continued
Liquidity and Capital Resources, continued
As of March 31, 2014, the Company had a deficit in working
capital of $875,031.
Management believes that the Company’s cash balances on
hand ($917,155 at March 31, 2014), cash flows expected to be generated from operations and borrowings available under the Company’s
credit facility will be sufficient to fund the Company’s net cash requirements through March 2015. However, in order to execute
the Company’s long-term growth strategy, which may include selected acquisitions of businesses that may bolster the expansion
of the Company’s environmental services business, the Company may need to raise additional funds through public or private
equity offerings, debt financings, or other means.
On January 21, 2014, the Company entered into a memorandum of
understanding (the “Sullivan MOU”) with Sullivan International Group, Inc. (“Sullivan”) regarding a potential
merger. Sullivan, headquartered in San Diego, CA, is a privately-held professional services firm providing applied science, environmental,
and technology services to the commercial and government sectors. The Sullivan MOU, which is non-binding and subject to the satisfactory
completion of a mutual due diligence review, provides that the Company will negotiate and enter into a merger agreement pursuant
to which Sullivan would merge with and into a subsidiary of the Company. The Company and Sullivan are in the process of negotiating
a merger agreement.
The Company currently has Private Placement Notes with an aggregate
obligation of $5,047,838 outstanding as of March 31, 2014 (as discussed in Note 6). The Private Placement Notes were modified on
December 31, 2013 to extend their maturities to April 30, 2015.
The Company also has a Loan Agreement with a balance of $2,713,797
outstanding as of March 31, 2014 (as discussed in Note 5), which expires on April 15, 2015. On April 8, 2014, in connection with
an amendment to the Loan Agreement effective April 1, 2014, among other modifications, the bank (i) increased by $1,000,000 the
amount of revolving loan availability through May 31, 2014 for the fiscal quarters ending on March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014,
and (ii) set the fixed asset coverage ratio at 0.75 to 1 and 1.2 to 1, for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2014 and ending
thereafter, respectively.
On March 26, 2013, the Company received a letter from the Air
Force seeking reimbursement of approximately $3.69 million related to the FOB Hope Project (as discussed in Note 7). The Company’s
management believes that it will be successful in defending its position with the Air Force. However, if the Company is not successful
in defending its position, the outcome would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”)
for interim financial information and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of
normal accruals) considered for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31,
2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014. The condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2013 and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”) on April 14, 2014.
As a result of the December 31, 2012 entry into an agreement
to sell its biodiesel production facility and related assets, the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2014 and
December 31, 2013 and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 present
the results and accounts of the Biodiesel Production business as discontinued operations. All prior periods presented in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations discussed herein have been restated to conform
to such presentation.
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Net Loss per Common Share
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available
to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per
share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during
the period. Potential common shares consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options (using
the treasury stock method) and the conversion of the Company’s convertible preferred stock, convertible notes payable, and
warrants (using the if-converted method). The computation of basic loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and
2013 excludes potentially dilutive securities. At March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company excluded potentially dilutive securities
of 32,128,323
and 28,436,651, respectively, because their inclusion would be antidilutive. As a result, the computations
of net loss per share for each period presented is the same for both basic and fully diluted. Weighted average shares outstanding
includes warrants to purchase 176,817 shares of common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.01 in accordance with Accounting
Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260, “Earnings per Share”, as the shares underlying these warrants can
be issued for little consideration.
Potentially dilutive securities outlined in the table below
have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share because the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
|
|
At March 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Private Placement Notes – principal
|
|
|
12,619,595
|
|
|
|
12,619,595
|
|
Private Placement Notes – accrued interest
|
|
|
3,467,102
|
|
|
|
2,173,727
|
|
Series B Stock
|
|
|
8,571,429
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Series B Stock – accrued dividends
|
|
|
165,477
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Series A Stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,571,429
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
4,297,400
|
|
|
|
4,046,900
|
|
Warrant to purchase common stock
|
|
|
2,007,320
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Sandoval Shares
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
Total potentially dilutive securities
|
|
|
32,128,323
|
|
|
|
28,436,651
|
|
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash on deposit with financial institutions, and accounts receivable. At times,
the Company’s cash in banks is in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. The Company has not experienced any loss as a result
of these deposits. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, one customer, who was a government customer, accounted for 29% and
44%, respectively, of the Company’s trade receivables. The Company has not experienced losses on the accounts for this customer,
and management believes that the Company’s risk resulting from this concentration is limited because this customer represents
an agency of the U.S. federal government. The Company does not generally require collateral or other security to support client
receivables. The Company monitors its exposure for credit losses and maintains allowances for anticipated losses, as required.
Fair Value Measurements
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities, approximate fair value due to the short-term
nature of these instruments.
Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount
that would be received upon the sale of an asset or payment to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
Fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing
an asset or liability. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the inputs in measuring fair value as follows:
|
·
|
Level 1.
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
·
|
Level 2.
|
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly.
|
|
·
|
Level 3.
|
Significant unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by market data.
|
The assets or liability’s fair value measurement within
the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following table
provides a summary of the assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets or
Liabilities
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
for Similar
Assets or
Liabilities in
Active
Markets
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
Derivative Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
2,071
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2.071
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
$
|
6,067
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,067
|
|
The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in
the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2014
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
6,067
|
|
Aggregate fair value of conversion features upon issuance
|
|
|
-
|
|
Change in fair value of conversion features
|
|
|
(3,996
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
2,071
|
|
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Fair Value Measurements, continued
The derivative conversion feature liabilities are measured
at fair value using the Black-Scholes pricing model and are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The significant
assumptions and valuation methods that the Company used to determine fair value and the change in fair value of the Company’s
derivative financial instruments are provided below:
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
Stock price
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
32.0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Weighted average contractual term
|
|
|
1.1 years
|
|
Level 3 liabilities are valued using unobservable inputs to
the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the derivative liabilities. For fair value
measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the Company’s accounting and finance department, which
reports to the Chief Financial Officer, determines its valuation policies and procedures. The development and determination of
the unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements and fair value calculations are the responsibility of the Company’s
accounting and finance department with support from the Company’s consultants and are approved by the Chief Financial Officer.
Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the derivative liabilities
for which there is no current market such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. Changes
in fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are analyzed each period based on changes in
estimates or assumptions and recorded as appropriate.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to
value Level 3 financial liabilities at inception and on subsequent valuation dates. This model incorporates transaction details
such as the Company’s stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as volatility.
A significant decrease in the volatility or a significant decrease in the Company’s stock price,
in isolation, would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement. Changes in the values of the derivative liabilities
are recorded in change in fair value of derivative liabilities within other expense (income) on the Company’s consolidated
statements of operations. As the Company’s common stock does not have sufficient trading volume, the Company determines volatility
by measuring the volatility of a representative group of its peers. At March 31, 2014, the peer group consisted solely of companies
operating in the environmental services sector.
As of March 31, 2014, there were no transfers in or out of
Level 3 from other levels in the fair value hierarchy.
In accordance with the provisions of ASC 815, “Derivatives
and Hedging Activities” (“ASC 815”), the Company presented the conversion feature liabilities at fair value
on its consolidated balance sheet, with the corresponding changes in fair value recorded in the Company’s consolidated statement
of operations for the applicable reporting periods. The Company computed the fair value of the derivative liability at the reporting
dates of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The Company determined that the conversion feature included
an implied downside protection feature. As such, upon initially recording the derivative liabilities during 2011, the Company
performed a Monte-Carlo simulation and concluded that the value of the downside protection feature is de minimis and the use of
the Black-Scholes valuation model was considered to be a reasonable method to value the conversion feature derivative liability.
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, continued
Fair Value Measurements, continued
The fair value of the Company’s common stock was derived
from the valuation of the Company using a combination of the discounted cash flows method and comparable companies’ methods
that included multiples based upon the last twelve months and forward revenues and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization (“EBITDA”). Management determined that the results of its valuation are reasonable. The term represents
the remaining contractual term of the derivative. The volatility rate was developed based on analysis of the historical volatility
rates of several other similarly situated companies (using a number of observations that was at least equal to or exceeded the
number of observations in the life of the derivative financial instrument at issue). The risk free interest rates were obtained
from publicly available US Treasury yield curve rates. The dividend yield is zero because the Company has not paid dividends and
does not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.
Income Taxes
Tax benefits are recognized only for tax positions that are
more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount
of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement. A liability for “unrecognized tax
benefits” is recorded for any tax benefits claimed in the Company’s tax returns that do not meet these recognition
and measurement standards. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, no liability for unrecognized tax benefits was required
to be reported. The guidance also discusses the classification of related interest and penalties on income taxes. The Company’s
policy is to record interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. No interest or penalties
were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
Management’s Evaluation of Subsequent Events
Management evaluates events that have occurred after the balance
sheet date but before the financial statements are issued. Based upon the evaluation, management did not identify any recognized
or nonrecognized subsequent events that would have required adjustment or disclosure in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 – INVESTMENT IN GAS ASSETS
On September 13, 2013, the Company formed
EQGP, LLC (“EQGP”) for the purpose of creating a joint venture with third party investors to develop certain landfill
gas assets acquired by the Company in connection with its acquisition of all of the capital stock of Vertterre Corp., a mechanical
and electrical engineering services firm (“Vertterre”), on December 27, 2012 (the “Landfill Gas Facility”).
On October 3, 2013, EQGP was capitalized with investments of $475,000 (representing a 63.3% ownership stake in EQGP) and $275,000
from EQ and certain third parties, respectively. On October 3, 2013, Vertterre sold its wholly-owned subsidiary that owned the
Landfill Gas Facility, Grand Prairie Landfill Gas Production, LLC (“GPLGP”), to EQGP and third party investors for
no consideration, for the purpose of facilitating the investment by EQGP and its third party partners in developing, constructing
and operating a landfill gas to electricity facility in Grand Prairie, Texas. The Company will provide engineering services and
equipment to GPLGP. On October 3, 2013, EQGP contributed $750,000 in cash to GPLGP.
As of March 31, 2014, GPLGP is in the
process of engineering, planning and permitting for the Landfill Gas Facility, with estimated completion projected during the
third quarter of 2014.
EQGP’s ownership stake in GPLGP consists of 13.07% of the Class A membership interests and 33.33%
of the Class B membership interests. The overall membership interests consist 50% of Class A membership interests and 50% of Class
B membership interests. (The Company’s total effective ownership interest in GPLGP is 29.37%). EQGP contributed $750,000
to GPLGP for these ownership interests and others have contributed $2,120,000 to GPLGP for their interests. In addition, GPLGP
will issue to a third party a note payable for $1,100,000 bearing interest at 10% per annum to provide construction financing for
the Landfill Gas Facility.
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 3 – INVESTMENT IN GAS ASSETS, continued
Pursuant to the terms of the GPLGP operating
agreement, cash flows generated by the Landfill Gas Facility will be distributed as provided below:
|
·
|
First,
the loans will be repaid (first to interest, then to principal);
|
|
·
|
Next,
the Class A Members will receive their accrued preferred return amount of 10% on the
outstanding balance of Class A membership interest (as defined in the GPLGP operating
agreement);
|
|
·
|
Next,
the Class A Members will receive all of their original aggregate capital contributions;
and
|
|
·
|
Next,
to and among the members in accordance with their allocated percentages.
|
In its accounting for the investment in the Landfill Gas Facility,
the Company has reflected EQGP on a consolidated basis since the Company has control over EQGP. The interests of the minority
members were reflected within noncontrolling interests in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company has applied
the equity method of accounting for EQGP’s investment in GPLGP, since EQGP does not control GPLGP.
Accordingly, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013,
the Company has recorded a loss on the investment in GPLGP of $12,405 and $0, respectively, which is included in other income,
net, and a net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests of $4,548 and $0, respectively, reflected in the consolidated statements
of operations.
The components of our investment in the
joint venture are summarized below:
Investment in joint venture, January 1, 2014
|
|
$
|
610,027
|
|
Investment in Landfill Gas Facility
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity in net loss of Landfill Gas Facility for the three months ended March 31, 2014
|
|
|
(12,405
|
)
|
Investment in joint venture, March 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
597,622
|
|
As of March 31, 2014, the investment in the Landfill Gas Facility
was $597,622 and was reflected within other assets, and noncontrolling interests of $219,082 was reflected as noncontrolling interests,
on the consolidated balance sheet.
The following table is a summary of key financial data for
EQGP as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2014:
Current assets
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
$
|
597,622
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
12,405
|
|
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 4 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On December 31, 2012, in connection with the execution of the
Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2012 (the “Biodiesel Purchase Agreement”), with Delek Renewables,
LLC (“Biodiesel Buyer”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Delek US Holdings, Inc., pursuant to which the Company sold to
Biodiesel Buyer its biodiesel production facility and related assets, constituting substantially all of the assets of the Company’s
former Biodiesel Production segment, the assets, liabilities and operating results of the Biodiesel Production segment were reclassified
to discontinued operations.
There were no results of discontinued operations during the
three months ended March 31, 2014. Results of discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 are as follows:
|
|
For the three months
ended March 31, 2013
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
35,958
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
$
|
(386,437
|
)
|
Loss before tax
|
|
$
|
(64,949
|
)
|
Loss, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(65,119
|
)
|
There were no assets and liabilities included
in discontinued operations as of March 31, 2014.
NOTE 5 – LOAN AGREEMENT
On September 28, 2012, EQ and EQE entered into a loan agreement
(as amended, the “Loan Agreement”) with a bank (the “Bank”) providing for a revolving credit facility and
a letter of credit facility. On February 27, 2013, EQ, EQE and Vertterre (together, the “Borrowers”) entered into a
First Amendment to Loan Agreement with the Bank to add Vertterre as a borrower under the Loan Agreement. On December 31, 2013,
the Borrowers entered into a Second Amendment to Loan Agreement to extend the termination date under the Loan Agreement to April
15, 2015 and obtain a consent by the Bank to the Note Modifications (as described in Note 6 – Convertible Promissory Notes),
among other matters. On April 8, 2014, the Borrowers entered into a Third Amendment to Loan Agreement to increase by $1,000,000
the amount of revolving loan availability through May 30, 2014, change the required fixed charge coverage ratio for the fiscal
quarter ending on March 31, 2014 and ending thereafter to 0.75 to 1 and 1.2 to 1, respectively, and increase the annual capital
expenditures threshold from $250,000 to $500,000, among other things. The Loan Agreement provides for maximum borrowings under
the credit facility of up to $10,000,000, including a letter of credit sub-limit of $2,000,000. Funds drawn under the revolving
credit facility bear interest at the one month London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), plus 3.0% (interest rate of
3.15% as of March 31, 2014). The Loan Agreement is secured by the assets of the Borrowers, is guaranteed by the Company and the
subsidiaries of Vertterre (supported by a pledge of all issued and outstanding stock of EQ, Vertterre and Vertterre’s subsidiaries)
and expires on April 15, 2015.
The Loan Agreement contains a variety of affirmative and negative
covenants, including, but not limited to, financial covenants that (i) require the Borrowers to maintain specified fixed charge
coverage ratios, and (ii) limit certain capital expenditures by the Borrowers to $250,000 per fiscal year. Fees under the Loan
Agreement include (i) a $750 per month collateral monitoring fee, (ii) an unused commitment fee of 0.25% per annum, and (iii) a
letter of credit fee of 2.0% per annum.
As of March 31, 2014, the available borrowing base under the
Loan Agreement totaled approximately $4,750,000, including $1,500,000 attributable to obligations under outstanding letters of
credit. As of March 31, 2014, $2,713,797 was outstanding under the Loan Agreement.
As of and for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014, the
Borrowers were in compliance with all financial covenants under the Loan Agreement.
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES
Private Placement Notes
On March 15, 2011 (“March 15 Notes”),
May 13, 2011 (“May 13 Notes”), December 30, 2011 (“December 30 Notes”) and March 30, 2012 (“March
2012 Note”), pursuant to the terms of note purchase agreements by and between the Company and each investor (each a “Private
Placement Note Purchase Agreement”), the Company completed the sale of $2,500,000, $500,000, $1,858,879, and $188,959 aggregate
principal amount of subordinated convertible notes (collectively, the “Private Placement Notes”), respectively, to
accredited investors in private placements. The aggregate amount of accrued and unpaid interest under the Private Placement Notes
as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $1,397,620 and $1,255,320, respectively.
The March 15 Notes bear interest at a rate of 15% per annum
and the May 13 Notes, December 30 Notes and March 2012 Note bear interest at a rate of 10% per annum, with such rate set to increase
to 15% effective upon the original maturity date of such notes prior to the Note Modifications discussed below (May 13, 2014 for
the May 13 Notes, and December 30, 2014 for the December 30 Notes and the March 2012 Note). The Private Placement Notes are due
and payable on April 30, 2015, and are unsecured and subordinate to the Company’s obligations to its senior lender. The principal
and accrued interest of the Private Placement Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, into a total of 12,619,595 and
3,467,102
shares, respectively, as of March 31, 2014, and 12,619,595 and 3,137,724 shares, respectively, as of December
31, 2013, at a conversion price of $0.40 per share (subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Private Placement
Notes). More specifically, the weighted average down round ratchet provision compensates the holder for certain dilutive events.
The Private Placement Notes also provide for customary events of default, the occurrence of which may result in all of the Private
Placement Notes then outstanding becoming immediately due and payable.
At any time after the one-year anniversary after the issuance
of a March 15 Note or May 13 Note, if and only if the Company’s common stock has traded at an average price per share that
is above two times the conversion price for 60 consecutive days, the Company may, in its discretion, convert any March 15 Note
or May 13 Note into shares of the Company’s common stock in full satisfaction of such March 15 Note or May 13 Note. Additionally,
in connection with the sale of the May 13 Notes, the Company and the holders of the May 13 Notes entered into a registration rights
agreement, dated as of May 13, 2011, providing for certain piggyback registration rights with respect to the shares of common
stock underlying the May 13 Notes.
At any time after the one-year anniversary after the issuance
of a December 30 Note or the March 2012 Note, the Company may, at its discretion, convert any December 30 Note or the March 2012
Note into shares of its common stock in full satisfaction of such December 30 Note or the March 2012 Note if (i) the common stock
is trading on a national securities exchange, (ii) the shares underlying the December 30 Note or March 2012 Note have been registered
for resale with the SEC and the resale registration statement is effective, (iii) the average weekly trading volume of the common
stock over the preceding three-months is equal to at least 1% of the total issued and outstanding shares of common stock, and
(iv) the average closing price or last sale price per share of common stock has been at least two times the then-effective conversion
price for any 60 consecutive trading days during the preceding six months. Pursuant to the purchase agreements entered into
in connection with the sale of the December 30 Notes and March 2012 Note, the Company agreed to certain covenants, including but
not limited to a covenant that the Company will prepare and file with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-3 or such other
available form covering the resale of the shares of its common stock issuable upon the conversion of the December 30 Notes and
March 2012 Note and shall cause such registration statement to become effective on or before June 30, 2014. Additionally,
in connection with the sale of the December 30 Notes and March 2012 Note, the Company and the holders of the December 30 Notes
and March 2012 Note entered into a registration rights agreement, dated as of December 30, 2011 and amended on March 30, 2012,
providing for certain demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to the shares of common stock underlying the December
30 Notes and March 2012 Note.
On December 31, 2013, the Company modified all of its Private
Placement Notes in aggregate principal amount of $5,047,838, principally in order to (i) extend their maturity dates to April
30, 2015 and (ii) increase the interest rate on their unpaid principal balance to 15% per annum effective upon each of their respective
original maturity dates (the “Note Modifications”). The other principle terms of the Private Placement Notes remained
the same. The Note Modifications were accounted for as a modification of debt.
In consideration for the Note Modifications, the Company issued
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,932,321 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share
(subject to adjustment) to the holders of the Private Placement Notes (the “Private Placement Warrants”). The grant
date fair value of the Private Placement Warrants issued of $145,175 was capitalized as debt issuance costs and is being amortized
over the remaining term of the Private Placement Notes.
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES, continued
Accounting for Convertible Promissory Notes
Pursuant to the terms of the Private Placement Notes, the applicable
conversion prices are subject to adjustment in the event that the Company subsequently issues common stock or other equity or
debt securities convertible into common stock at a price less than such conversion price. More specifically, the weighted average
down round ratchet provision compensates the holder for certain dilutive events. The Company bifurcated the conversion option
derivative from its debt host in accordance with ASC 815. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded
an additional derivative liability of $0 and $617, respectively, for the accrued interest on the Private Placement Notes, which
also was convertible. The Company amortized the respective discounts over the original terms of the notes, using the effective
interest method. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, $103,922 and $105,812, respectively, of the note and accrued
interest discount was amortized and charged to interest expense.
As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, after the mark-to-market
adjustment, the aggregate fair value of the conversion liability was $2,071 and $6,067, respectively, representing the fair value
of the conversion feature of both the principal and the interest for the Private Placement Notes.
Convertible promissory notes consist of:
|
|
As of March 31, 2014
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
Balance, Net
of Discount
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
Balance, Net
of Discount
|
|
March 15 Notes
|
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
49,500
|
|
|
$
|
2,450,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 13 Notes
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
5,762
|
|
|
|
494,238
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
17,611
|
|
|
|
482,389
|
|
December 30 Notes
|
|
|
1,858,879
|
|
|
|
106,714
|
|
|
|
1,752,165
|
|
|
|
1,858,879
|
|
|
|
140,411
|
|
|
|
1,718,468
|
|
March 2012 Note
|
|
|
188,959
|
|
|
|
4,491
|
|
|
|
184,468
|
|
|
|
188,959
|
|
|
|
5,938
|
|
|
|
183,021
|
|
Total convertible promissory notes, net
|
|
$
|
5,047,838
|
|
|
$
|
116,967
|
|
|
$
|
4,930,871
|
|
|
$
|
5,047,838
|
|
|
$
|
213,460
|
|
|
$
|
4,834,378
|
|
Future minimum principal payments of these convertible promissory
notes are as follows:
For the Twelve Months Ended March 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
2016
|
|
|
5,047,838
|
|
Total, gross
|
|
$
|
5,047,838
|
|
Less: discount
|
|
|
(116,967
|
)
|
Total, net
|
|
$
|
4,930,871
|
|
As of March 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with the
terms of the Private Placement Notes.
NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various claims, legal actions and
regulatory proceedings arising from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Other than the matters set forth below, in
the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our combined financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES,
continued
Legal Proceedings, continued
Energy Solutions Claim
During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company was notified
that Energy Solutions Government Group, Inc. (“Energy Solutions”), which was engaged by the Company and Sullivan for
subcontract services, is seeking a total of $2,567,472 from the Company and Sullivan, of which the Company’s portion is $1,258,061.
The Company believes that the services allegedly performed by Energy Solutions were unapproved and not part of the Company’s
agreement with Energy Solutions. The Company and Sullivan have been negotiating a potential settlement with Energy Solutions and
have reached a tentative agreement in principal under which the Company and Sullivan would pay Energy Solutions $1,657,283. The
Company’s portion of such payment would be $697,735, which amount has been accounted for under accrued expenses as of March
31, 2014.
Environmental Restoration Claim
Environmental Restoration (“ER”), which is a subcontractor
of EQM, pursuant to a notice received on November 8, 2013, has alleged damages of $3 million on the basis that it was guaranteed
more work under its subcontract agreement for ERRS Region 6 than it actually received. The Company believes that this claim is
without merit and that it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to pay any amount in connection with this claim.
The Company is in regular communications with ER regarding their claim. This matter is still pending as of March 31, 2014.
Investigation Regarding FOB Hope Project
In August 2007, the Company initiated an internal investigation
regarding potential billing for unallowable costs in connection with its construction of a forward operating base in Iraq beginning
in 2006 (the “FOB Hope Project”). The Company completed the FOB Hope Project in March 2008. The Company submitted its
findings to the Office of the Department of Defense Inspector General and the Company was admitted into the Department of Defense
Voluntary Disclosure Program, which provides participants with certain protections and rights related to possible contract violations.
The Company answered all questions of, and submitted all information requested by, the Federal government concerning this matter.
On March 26, 2013, the Company received a letter from the Department of the Air Force informing the Company that the Air Force
Civil Engineer Center is seeking reimbursement of approximately $3.69 million, based on approximately $440,409 in overbillings
that it disclosed as part of the Voluntary Disclosure Program and an additional approximately $3.25 million in unallowable costs
as determined by a verification investigation conducted by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”). The Air Force
has requested that payment be made promptly and informed the Company that the Defense Finance and Accounting Services payment office
may initiate procedures to offset the amount of the requested reimbursement against any payments otherwise due to the Company.
The letter advises the Company that if it believes that the requested reimbursement is invalid or the amount is incorrect, the
Company should contact the sender to discuss. Beyond what has already been accrued, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the
amount that will ultimately be paid under this claim. As a result, an unfavorable outcome may have a material impact on the Company’s
operations. The Company is in regular communications with the DCAA regarding their claim. This matter is still pending as of March
31, 2014.
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES,
continued
Legal Proceedings, continued
Investigation Regarding FOB Hope Project, continued
Pursuant to an agreement with the Air Force, the Company began
making payments on the disclosed $440,409 in overbillings, with $220,113 paid through March 31, 2014, an additional $184,181 to
be paid over the remainder of 2014 and $35,932 to be paid in 2015. The Company has filed a challenge with the Air Force through
their attorney on the remaining $3.25 million claim and is awaiting a response from the Air Force. As of March 31, 2014, the Company
has included within accrued expenses and other current liabilities, within the consolidated balance sheet, a total of $220,296
for amounts that are due in regard to the FOB Hope Project, which represents the agreed upon overbillings obligation amount of
$440,409 less the payments of $220,113 made through March 31, 2014.
FOB Hope Project Claim for Equitable Adjustment
In 2008, the Company filed a request with the U.S. Air Force
for an equitable adjustment in connection with the FOB Hope Project (the “Air Force Claim”). The Company completed
the FOB Hope Project in March 2008. The Air Force Claim is being reviewed, but the Company has not been provided with a
specific time line for final resolution of the Air Force Claim and the Company is not able to determine the amount that might
be received in connection with the Air Force Claim. The Company do not believe that the results of this matter will have a material
effect on its operations.
Memorandum of Understanding with Sullivan International
Group, Inc.
On January 21, 2014, the Company entered into the Sullivan MOU
regarding a potential merger. The Sullivan MOU, which is non-binding and subject to the satisfactory completion of a mutual due
diligence review, provides that the Company will negotiate and enter into a merger agreement pursuant to which Sullivan would merge
with and into a subsidiary of the Company. The Company and Sullivan are in the process of negotiating a merger agreement.
The Sullivan MOU contains a binding exclusivity provision in
which Sullivan has agreed that for 180 days it will not enter into another agreement with a third party with respect to the acquisition
or sale of Sullivan or a material part of its assets, or engage in any related discussions with a third party. This
exclusivity provision is extended automatically for an additional 180 days if the Company enters into a letter of intent or similar
agreement with an underwriter or placement agent with respect to the financing. On March 26, 2013, the Company entered into an
engagement letter with Roth Capital Partners, LLC to explore financing opportunities, with Monarch Capital Group, LLC acting as
a co-manager. As a result, the exclusivity provision of the Sullivan MOU has been extended according to its terms.
Notwithstanding the above, the MOU does not preclude the Company
from continuing to pursue or close other potential acquisition candidates.
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 8 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
Stock Options
The fair value of stock options is amortized
on a straight line basis over the requisite service periods of the respective awards. Stock based compensation expense related
to stock options was $35,033 and $47,366 for three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and was reflected in selling,
general and administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of March 31, 2014, the unamortized
value of options was $11,969. As of March 31, 2014, the unamortized portion will be expensed over a period of 0.2 years.
The following table is a summary of activity
under the Company’s 2011 Stock Option Plan:
|
|
Number of
Options
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
Options outstanding at January 1, 2014
|
|
|
4,306,400
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
7.5 years
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(9,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Options outstanding at March 31, 2014
|
|
|
4,297,400
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
7.3 years
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at January 1, 2014
|
|
|
3,129,200
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
7.5 years
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
872,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(6,750
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2014
|
|
|
3,994,950
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
7.2 years
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Warrants to Purchase Common Stock
The following table is a summary of activity
for the warrants issued by the Company:
|
|
Number of
Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life in
Years
|
Warrants outstanding at January 1, 2014
|
|
|
2,184,138
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
9.6 years
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at March 31, 2014
|
|
|
2,184,138
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
9.3 years
|
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 9 – MAJOR CUSTOMERS
The Company’s two largest customers,
representing work performed under government contracts, accounted for approximately 45%, and 4% of consolidated revenues, respectively,
during the three months ended March 31, 2014, and accounted for 37% and 25% of consolidated revenues, respectively, during the
three months ended March 31, 2013.
NOTE 10 - RELATED PARTIES
Argentum Capital Partners II, L.P., Argentum Capital Partners,
L.P., Walter Barandiaran and Daniel Raynor
Mr. Barandiaran serves as the Company’s
Chairman of the Board. Mr. Barandiaran and Mr. Raynor are co-managing members of Argentum Investments, LLC, which is the managing
member of Argentum Partners II, LLC, which is the general partner of ACP II. Additionally, Mr. Barandiaran is the President and
Mr. Raynor is the chairman of B.R. Associates, Inc., which is the general partner of Argentum Capital Partners, L.P. (“ACP”).
As of March 31, 2014, ACP II, ACP, Mr. Barandiaran and Mr. Raynor, collectively, owned 21,313,086 shares of the Company’s
common stock, 952,381 shares of Series B Stock (convertible into 8,571,429 shares of the Company’s common stock) and Private
Placement Warrants to purchase 648,605 shares of the Company’s common stock.
The Company and Argentum Equity Management,
LLC (“Argentum Management”), an affiliate of ACP II, are parties to a Management Services Agreement (the “Management
Services Agreement”), dated July 1, 2012, pursuant to which the Company engaged Argentum Management to provide certain management
services to the Company, including serving as a consultant with respect to periodic reviews of its business, operations, and strategic
direction; assisting the Board in corporate governance, personnel, compensation, and other matters; providing the Company with
assistance in identifying and analyzing potential mergers, acquisitions and financing transactions; and providing the Company with
the services of its Chairman of the Board, among other things. In consideration of the performance of these services, the Management
Services Agreement provides for the payment of minimum annual fees to Argentum Management as follows: $120,000 for the period January
1, 2013 to December 31, 2013, $150,000 for the period January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, and $180,000 for the period January
1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. The annual fee is payable in monthly installments in arrears in cash. The Management Services Agreement
will continue in effect until the earlier of (i) the date as of which Argentum Management or one or more of its affiliates no longer
collectively control, in the aggregate, at least 20% of the Company’s equity interests (on a fully diluted basis), or (ii)
such earlier date as the Company and Argentum Management may mutually agree. On September 27, 2013, Argentum Management agreed
to waive $40,000 of its annual fee for the year end December 31, 2013.
On March 15, 2011, ACP, ACP II, Mr. Barandiaran, and two trusts
controlled by Mr. Raynor purchased March 15 Notes. On May 13, 2011, ACP purchased a May 13 Note. On December 30, 2011, ACP
II, Mr. Barandiaran, and a trust controlled by Mr. Raynor purchased December 30 Notes. The current amount of principal and accrued
and unpaid interest outstanding on each of these notes is presented in the table below.
On December 31, 2013, in consideration of the Note Modification
(as described in Note 6 – Convertible Promissory Notes), ACP II, ACP, Mr. Barandiaran and Mr. Raynor were issued Private
Placement Warrants to purchase 326,889, 187,867, 71,049, and 62,800 shares of the Company’s common stock each at an exercise
price of $0.25 per share, respectively.
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 10 - RELATED PARTIES, continued
Jack Greber
Mr. Greber is a director and Senior Vice President
of EPA Programs and Business Development of the Company and served as the Company’s President from 2000 through November
2011 and Chief Executive Officer from March 2008 to November 2011. As of March 31, 2014, Mr. Greber owned 3,058,314
shares
of the Company’s common stock and Private Placement Warrants to purchase 296,044 shares of the Company’s common stock.
On March 15, 2011, Mr. Greber purchased a
March 15 Note. On December 30, 2011, Mr. Greber purchased a December 30 Note. On March 30, 2012, the Company issued to Mr. Greber
a March 2012 Note. The current amount of principal and accrued and unpaid interest outstanding on each of these notes is presented
in the table below.
On December 31, 2013, in consideration of the Note Modification
(as described in Note 6 – Convertible Promissory Notes), Mr. Greber was issued Private Placement Warrants to purchase 296,044
shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share.
Jon Colin, Robert Galvin, and Kurien Jacob
Jon Colin serves as the Company’s interim
Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company. Robert R. Galvin serves as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer
and Kurien Jacob serves as a director of the Company. As of March 31, 2014, Messrs. Colin, Galvin and Jacob, collectively, owned
706,424 shares of the Company’s common stock and Private Placement Warrants to purchase 101,733 shares of the Company’s
common stock.
On March 15, 2011, Messrs. Galvin and Jacob
purchased March 15 Notes. On May 13, 2011, Mr. Colin purchased a May 13 Note. The current amount of principal and accrued and
unpaid interest outstanding on each of these notes is presented in the table below.
On December 31, 2013, in consideration of the Note Modification
(as described in Note 6 – Convertible Promissory Notes), Messrs. Colin, Galvin and Jacob were issued Private Placement Warrants
to purchase 46,933, 27,400, and 27,400 shares of the Company’s common stock each at an exercise price of $0.25 per share,
respectively.
Related Party Holdings
As of March 31, 2014, the following principal
and interest amounts were outstanding on notes held by the following related parties:
|
|
March 15 Notes
|
|
|
May 13 Notes
|
|
|
December 30 Notes
|
|
|
March 2012 Notes
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Argentum Capital Partners II, L.P.
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
93,333
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,015,556
|
|
|
$
|
231,885
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Argentum Capital Partners, L.P.
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
93,333
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,625
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Walter Barandiaran
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
31,111
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
101,556
|
|
|
$
|
23,189
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Daniel Raynor
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
31,111
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,417
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Jack Greber
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
|
$
|
116,667
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
376,944
|
|
|
$
|
86,069
|
|
|
$
|
188,959
|
|
|
$
|
38,369
|
|
Robert Galvin
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,556
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Jon Colin
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
29,250
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Kurien Jacob
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,556
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
EQM TECHNOLOGIES & ENERGY, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 10 - RELATED PARTIES, continued
Related Party Holdings, continued
As of December 31, 2013, the following notes were outstanding
and held by the following related parties:
|
|
March 15 Notes
|
|
|
May 13 Notes
|
|
|
December 30 Notes
|
|
|
March 2012 Notes
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Argentum Capital Partners II, L.P.
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
85,167
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,015,556
|
|
|
$
|
206,496
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Argentum Capital Partners, L.P.
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
85,167
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
13,375
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Walter Barandiaran
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
28,389
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
101,556
|
|
|
$
|
20,650
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Daniel Raynor
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
28,389
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,167
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Jack Greber
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
|
$
|
106,458
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
376,944
|
|
|
$
|
76,645
|
|
|
$
|
188,959
|
|
|
$
|
33,645
|
|
Robert Galvin
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,194
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Jon Colin
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
26,750
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Kurien Jacob
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,194
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|