NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BUSINESS AND ORGANIZATION
Roberts Realty Investors, Inc.
(“Roberts Realty”), a Georgia corporation, was formed on July 22, 1994 to serve as a vehicle for investments in, and
ownership of, a professionally managed real estate portfolio of multifamily apartment communities. Roberts Realty owns and manages
its real estate assets as a self-administered, self-managed equity real estate investment trust, or REIT.
Roberts Realty conducts all of
its operations and owns all of its assets in and through Roberts Properties Residential, L.P., a Georgia limited partnership (the
“operating partnership”), and the operating partnership’s wholly owned subsidiary, which is a Georgia limited
liability company. Roberts Realty controls the operating partnership as its sole general partner and had an 80.20% ownership interest
in the operating partnership at June 30, 2014 and an 84.74% ownership interest in the operating partnership at June 30, 2013.
At June 30, 2014, Roberts Realty
owned the following real estate assets, all of which are located in the north Atlanta metropolitan area:
|
·
|
three tracts of land totaling 71 acres, zoned for 584 multifamily apartment units, that are in
various phases of development and construction; and
|
|
·
|
two tracts of land totaling 11 acres that are held for sale, including a 1.3-acre tract which has
subsequently been sold for $700,000 (see Note 3 – Real Estate Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations and Note 11
– Subsequent Event).
|
Management’s Business
Plan.
Roberts Realty intends to focus exclusively on developing, constructing, and managing high quality multifamily apartment
communities for cash flow and long-term capital appreciation. As part of its future business and growth plan, Roberts Realty expects
to acquire existing multifamily apartment communities and to concentrate its acquisitions on well-located Class B apartment communities
in the southeastern United States that can be upgraded and repositioned in their respective markets.
Roberts Realty’s primary
liquidity requirements are related to its continuing negative operating cash flow and maturing short-term debt. Roberts Realty’s
negative operating cash flow is primarily due to its ownership of five tracts of land that do not produce ongoing revenue but incur
carrying costs of interest expense and real estate taxes. Roberts Realty is using its current cash balance to meet its short-term
liquidity requirements, including general and administrative expenses, principal reductions on its debt, and funding carrying costs
and improvements at its existing properties. Roberts Realty has the ability to defer property development costs, if necessary,
to meet its short-term liquidity requirements. As of July 18, 2014, Roberts Realty had three loans with a total principal balance
of $10,374,636 that are scheduled to mature within the next 12 months: (a) the $1,874,636 Highway 20 land loan that matures on
October 8, 2014; (b) the $5,500,000 North Springs land loan that matures on October 17, 2014 (which Roberts Realty can extend
to January 17, 2015 through a 3-month extension option by paying a 1.0% extension fee); and (c) the $3,000,000 Bradley Park land
loan that matures on April 1, 2015.
Management’s primary objectives
for the remainder of 2014 are to sell the North Springs transit-oriented property and to continue to develop the Bradley Park,
Northridge, and Highway 20 properties while continuing to reduce the company’s debt and decrease its negative operating cash
flow.
Roberts Realty intends to use
the sales proceeds from the North Springs property, which has an independent appraised value of $16,350,000, to pay off its $5,500,000
land loan. Management intends to renew, refinance, or repay the Highway 20 and Bradley Park loans as they come due and to extend
their maturity dates at least 12 months, if necessary. Management believes that its long history of operating and developing multifamily
apartment communities, its current plans to sell the North Springs property or use it in a joint venture and to continue developing
its remaining land, will allow it to successfully extend or obtain alternative funding to repay or refinance these loans.
If Roberts Realty does not sell
the North Springs property as it intends, or Roberts Realty is unable to extend, refinance, or find alternative funding to repay,
the North Springs, Highway 20, and Bradley Park loans at maturity, it might be compelled to dispose of one or more of its properties
on disadvantageous terms or it might be forced to return these properties to the respective lenders in satisfaction of the debt
secured by these properties, which could result in significant losses.
However, Roberts Realty believes
that this is an opportune time to create new multifamily apartment communities and that it can create value for its shareholders
as it has historically done through developing, constructing, and managing high quality multifamily apartment communities for cash
flow and long-term capital appreciation. Roberts Realty intends to continue moving forward with the development and construction
of its Bradley Park, Northridge, and Highway 20 multifamily apartment communities, although it cannot make substantial progress
on constructing and leasing up these apartment communities until it raises the necessary equity and obtains the required construction
loans. Management currently estimates that it will need approximately $17,325,000 of additional equity and $53,129,000 of debt
to complete the construction of the Bradley Park, Northridge, and Highway 20 multifamily apartment communities.
Roberts Realty is in discussions
with possible joint venture participants such as pension funds, life insurance companies, hedge funds, sovereign wealth funds,
other foreign investors, and local investors regarding providing the additional equity for the development and construction of
the Bradley Park, Northridge, and Highway 20 multifamily apartment communities. Roberts Realty may also form a new affiliate that
would raise private equity for the specific purpose of purchasing one or more of the remaining land parcels and constructing multifamily
apartment communities. Roberts Realty may also sell one or more of these land parcels to Roberts Properties, Inc. (“Roberts
Properties”), which is wholly-owned by Mr. Charles S. Roberts, the President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the
Board of Roberts Realty, or to a newly formed affiliate of Roberts Properties that would raise private equity for the specific
purpose of purchasing one or more of the remaining land parcels and constructing multifamily apartment communities.
If Roberts Realty is unable to
sell the North Springs property, find a joint venture partner, or raise private equity as it intends, Roberts Realty will be unable
to carry out its planned development and construction program and execute its business plan, which might result in significant
losses. Roberts Realty cannot provide any assurance that it will be able to raise the equity and obtain the debt needed to complete
the construction of any new multifamily communities.
As previously reported, in addition
to the above objectives, Roberts Realty continues to work on strategic alternatives that would maximize shareholder value through
a sale, merger, other business combination, or recapitalization. Roberts Realty has engaged in discussions with both private companies
and individuals regarding these alternatives, including parties that have expressed a desire to become a public company through
a transaction with Roberts Realty. To date, Roberts Realty has not entered into any definitive agreement for such a transaction.
Management continues to pursue and work diligently on any such transaction that would reward shareholders and maximize their value,
although Roberts Realty is unable to provide any assurance that such a transaction will be consummated.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Roberts Realty’s management
has prepared the accompanying interim unaudited financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in conformity with the rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements reflect
all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature that are necessary to fairly state the interim financial statements. The results
of operations for the interim periods do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for the year ending December
31, 2014. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Roberts Realty’s audited financial
statements and the accompanying notes in Roberts Realty’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Roberts Realty has omitted from these notes to condensed consolidated financial statements some of the disclosures contained in
the notes to the audited financial statements included in its annual report. In the condensed consolidated financial statements
included in this report, Roberts Realty has made certain reclassifications of prior year’s balances with respect to discontinued
operations and real estate assets held for sale to conform to the current presentation.
Holders of operating partnership
units generally have the right to require the operating partnership to redeem their units for shares of Roberts Realty common stock.
Upon submittal of units for redemption, the operating partnership has the option either (a) to acquire those units in exchange
for shares, currently on the basis of 1.647 shares for each unit submitted for redemption (the “Conversion Factor”),
or (b) to pay cash for those units at their fair market value, based upon the then current trading price of the shares and using
the same exchange ratio. Roberts Realty has adopted a policy of issuing shares in exchange for all units submitted for redemption.
In July 2013, the operating partnership
privately offered to investors who held both units of the operating partnership and shares of common stock the opportunity to contribute
shares to the operating partnership in exchange for units, provided that the investors were “accredited investors”
under SEC Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act. This opportunity remains open to those accredited investors. Consistent
with the Conversion Factor noted above, the offering of units uses a “Contribution Factor” such that an accredited
investor who contributes shares to the operating partnership will receive one unit for every 1.647 shares contributed.
The noncontrolling interest of
the unitholders in the operating partnership on the accompanying balance sheets is calculated by multiplying the noncontrolling
interest ownership percentage at the balance sheet date by the operating partnership’s net assets (total assets less total
liabilities). The noncontrolling interest ownership percentage is calculated at any point in time by dividing (x) (the number of
units outstanding multiplied by 1.647) by (y) the total number of shares plus (the number of units outstanding multiplied by 1.647).
The noncontrolling interest ownership percentage will change as additional shares and/or units are issued or as units are redeemed
for shares of Roberts Realty common stock or as Roberts Realty common stock is contributed to the operating partnership and units
are issued in accordance with the Contribution Factor. The noncontrolling interest of the unitholders in the income or loss of
the operating partnership on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations is calculated based on the weighted
average percentage of units outstanding during the period, which was 19.82% for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 15.31%
for the three months ended June 30, 2013; and 19.88% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 15.38% for the six months ended
June 30, 2013. There were 1,508,519 units outstanding as of June 30, 2014 and 1,519,036 units outstanding as of December 31, 2013.
The noncontrolling interest of the unitholders was $2,992,777 at June 30, 2014 and $3,328,791 at December 31, 2013.
Under Financial Accounting Standards
Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810,
Consolidation
, Roberts Realty
records noncontrolling interest in the operating partnership on its condensed consolidated balance sheets at the greater of its
carrying amount or redemption value at the end of each reporting period. Any changes in the value from period to period are charged
to “additional paid-in-capital”.
The following table details the
components of noncontrolling interest related to unitholders in the operating partnership for the six months ended June 30, 2014
and 2013 (see Note 5 – Shareholders’ Equity – Earnings per Share):
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
3,328,791
|
|
|
$
|
2,674,390
|
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(313,905
|
)
|
|
|
(34,143
|
)
|
Redemptions of noncontrolling partnership units
|
|
|
(14,570
|
)
|
|
|
(33,100
|
)
|
Adjustments to noncontrolling interest in operating partnership
|
|
|
(7,539
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
2,992,777
|
|
|
$
|
2,607,052
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements.
Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02;
Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(“ASU 2013-02”)
.
In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-02.
The objective of this ASU is to improve the reporting of reclassifications of various components out of accumulated other comprehensive
income and requires an entity to disaggregate the total change of each component of other comprehensive income either on the face
of the income statement or as a separate disclosure in the accompanying notes to the financial statements. The guidance in
ASU 2013-02 became effective for Roberts Realty beginning January 1, 2013. The implementation of this pronouncement did not
have a material impact on Roberts Realty’s consolidated financial statements.
3. REAL ESTATE ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
FASB ASC Topic 360-10,
Property,
Plant and Equipment – Overall
requires a long-lived asset to be classified as “held for sale” in the period
in which certain criteria are met. Roberts Realty classifies real estate assets and their related liabilities as held for sale
after the following conditions have been satisfied: (1) the receipt of approval from its board of directors to sell the asset,
(2) the initiation of an active program to sell the asset, and (3) the asset is available for immediate sale and it is probable
that the sale of the asset will be completed within one year. When assets are classified as held for sale, they are recorded at
the lower of the assets’ carrying amount or fair value, less the estimated selling costs.
Roberts Realty periodically classifies
real estate assets as held for sale, and these assets and their liabilities are stated separately on the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets. The real estate assets held for sale and the liabilities related to real estate assets held for sale
as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:
|
|
Real Estate Assets Held for Sale
|
Land Parcels
|
|
6/30/14
|
|
12/31/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Springs Land
|
|
$
|
11,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,000,000
|
|
Commercial Site in Johns Creek
(1)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Assets Held for Sale
|
|
$
|
11,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,500,000
|
|
|
|
Liabilities Related to
Real Estate Assets Held for Sale
|
|
|
6/30/14
|
|
12/31/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Springs Land Loan
|
|
$
|
5,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,500,000
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
76,328
|
|
|
|
61,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities Related to Real Estate Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held for Sale
|
|
$
|
5,576,328
|
|
|
$
|
5,561,579
|
|
|
(1)
|
Roberts Realty sold the Johns Creek commercial site for $700,000
on July 17, 2014. See Note 11 – Subsequent Event.
|
On February 7, 2013,
Roberts Realty sold a 20.6-acre portion of the Peachtree Parkway land for $7,590,000 ($7,090,000 net of a $500,000 payment required
to release a restrictive covenant on the property). See Note 7 – Related Party Transactions. Roberts Realty used $7,000,200
of the sale proceeds to repay the Peachtree Parkway loan. Roberts Realty recorded a $1,214,192 gain on this sale.
On March 20, 2013, Roberts Realty
sold the remaining 1.5 acres of the Peachtree Parkway land for $450,000. Roberts Realty recorded a $39,741 gain on this sale.
Roberts Realty reports the results
of operations and the gains or losses from operating properties that are disposed of in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 360-10,
Property, Plant and Equipment – Overall
. These assets and their liabilities are separately stated on the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheets as assets or liabilities related to discontinued operations. Gains and losses, the results
of operations, interest expense, and all expenses related to the retirement of debt from operating properties that are disposed
of are included in discontinued operations in the period incurred and are shown separately in the condensed consolidated statements
of operations as loss from discontinued operations.
The following table summarizes
the discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited):
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
231,397
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
488,606
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
40,633
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
76,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
272,030
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
564,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
30,705
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
64,688
|
|
Repairs and maintenance
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
22,484
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
48,110
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
35,680
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
67,638
|
|
Marketing, insurance and other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,957
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
24,031
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15,204
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
22,427
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
33,638
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
95,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
148,668
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
322,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(195,180
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(384,665
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred financing & leasing costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5,753
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(11,484
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(200,868
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(396,075
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS FROM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(77,506
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(153,255
|
)
|
On November 5, 2013, Roberts Realty
completed the transfer of the Bassett retail center to the lender in satisfaction of the $2,406,883 in debt secured by the property,
which completed Roberts Realty’s exit from the office and retail business. Roberts Realty recorded a $63,721 loss on the
extinguishment of debt related to this transaction.
On October 30, 2013, Roberts Realty
sold its Northridge Office Building for $5,280,000. At the closing, Roberts Realty paid off the $2,422,533 Northridge Office Building
loan. Roberts Realty recorded a $1,764,676 gain on this sale.
On August 6, 2013, Roberts Realty completed
the transfer of the Spectrum retail center to the lender, in satisfaction of the $4,691,528 in debt secured by the property. Roberts
Realty recorded a $298,543 loss on the extinguishment of debt related to this transaction.
As a result of the dispositions of the
Bassett and Spectrum retail centers and the sale of the Northridge Office Building, Roberts Realty has classified these operating
properties as discontinued operations as outlined in the tables above.
4. NOTES PAYABLE
Land Loans
The operating partnership
is the borrower and Roberts Realty is the guarantor for the loans secured by Roberts Realty’s land parcels. The outstanding
principal balances of these loans at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows (in order of maturity date):
Land Parcel
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Rate as of
|
|
|
Principal Outstanding
|
|
Securing Loan
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
6/30/14
|
|
|
6/30/14
|
|
|
12/31/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highway 20
(1)
|
|
|
10/08/14
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,565,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,600,000
|
|
Bradley Park
|
|
|
4/1/15
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Land Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,565,000
|
|
|
|
5,600,000
|
|
North Springs
(2) (3)
|
|
|
10/17/14
|
|
|
|
13.00
|
%
|
|
|
5,500,000
|
|
|
|
5,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Land Loans for Real Estate Assets Held for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,500,000
|
|
|
|
5,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,065,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,100,000
|
|
|
(1)
|
On July 17, 2014, the Highway 20 land loan was paid down by $690,364.
See Note 11 – Subsequent Event.
|
|
(2)
|
The North Springs land loan can be extended to January 17, 2015 through
a 3-month extension option by paying a 1.0% extension fee. Upon the sale of the North Springs property, Roberts Realty will pay
a 1% exit fee to the lender.
|
|
(3)
|
The North Springs land loan is classified as liabilities related
to real estate assets held for sale in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. See Note 3 – Real Estate Assets Held for
Sale and Discontinued Operations.
|
Maturing Short-Term Debt.
As of July 18, 2014, Roberts Realty has three loans with a total principal balance of $10,374,636 that mature within the next 12
months. For an explanation of management’s plan to address Roberts Realty’s maturing short-term debt, see Note 1
– Business and Organization – Management’s Business Plan.
5. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Redemption of Units for Shares.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, 10,517 units were redeemed for 17,323 shares. During the three months ended
June 30, 2013, 13,069 operating partnership units were redeemed for 21,525 shares, and during the six months ended June 30, 2013,
15,599 operating partnership units were redeemed for 25,692 shares. Each redemption was reflected in the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements based on the closing price of Roberts Realty’s shares on the date of redemption. See Note
2 – Basis of Presentation.
Treasury Stock.
Roberts
Realty did not repurchase any shares during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
Restricted Stock.
Shareholders
of Roberts Realty approved and adopted the 2006 Roberts Realty Investors, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan (the “Plan”) in
August 2006. The Plan provides for the grant of stock awards to employees, directors, consultants, and advisors, including employees
of Roberts Properties, Inc. and Roberts Properties Construction, Inc. (“Roberts Construction,” and together with Roberts
Properties, the “Roberts Companies”). Mr. Charles S. Roberts, the President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman
of the Board of Roberts Realty, owns all of the outstanding stock of the Roberts Companies. Under the Plan as amended, Roberts
Realty may grant up to 654,000 shares of restricted common stock, subject to the anti-dilution provisions of the Plan. The maximum
number of shares of restricted stock that may be granted to any one individual during the term of the Plan may not exceed 20% of
the aggregate number of shares of restricted stock that may be issued. The Plan is administered by the compensation committee of
Roberts Realty’s board of directors.
FASB ASC Topic 718,
Compensation
– Stock Compensation
, requires share-based compensation costs to be measured at the date of grant based on the fair value
of the award and to be recognized in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations as an expense on a straight
line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period.
There was no restricted stock
activity during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. No unvested shares of restricted stock were outstanding
at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Compensation expense related to restricted stock was $0 for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2014; $1,677 for the three months ended June 30, 2013; and $18,630 for the six months ended June
30, 2013. No unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock will be recognized in future periods as of June 30,
2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Earnings Per Share.
The
following table shows the reconciliations of loss available for common shareholders and the weighted average number of shares used
in Roberts Realty’s basic and diluted earnings per share computations. The effect of the operating partnership units and
the related income are not included in the diluted earnings per share calculations because they are not dilutive. See Note 2 –
Basis of Presentation.
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations available for common shareholders – basic
|
|
$
|
(644,879
|
)
|
|
$
|
(500,633
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,265,093
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58,170
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(159,410
|
)
|
|
|
(90,503
|
)
|
|
|
(313,905
|
)
|
|
|
(10,572
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations – diluted
|
|
|
(804,289
|
)
|
|
|
(591,136
|
)
|
|
|
(1,578,998
|
)
|
|
|
(68,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations for common shareholders – basic
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(65,640
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(129,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(11,866
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(23,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations – diluted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(77,506
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(153,255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss – diluted
|
|
$
|
(804,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
(668,642
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,578,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
(221,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares – basic and diluted
|
|
|
10,061,062
|
|
|
|
10,662,226
|
|
|
|
10,053,489
|
|
|
|
10,652,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of units
|
|
|
2,486,658
|
|
|
|
1,926,961
|
|
|
|
2,494,231
|
|
|
|
1,936,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares – assuming the conversion of all units to shares
|
|
|
12,547,720
|
|
|
|
12,589,187
|
|
|
|
12,547,720
|
|
|
|
12,589,187
|
|
6. SEGMENT REPORTING
FASB ASC Topic 280-10,
Segment
Reporting – Overall
, established standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about operating segments
in annual financial statements. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information
is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing
performance. Roberts Realty’s chief operating decision maker is Mr. Roberts, its President.
Roberts Realty develops, constructs,
owns, and manages multifamily apartment communities and owns land. Although Roberts Realty previously owned and managed two retail
centers and an office building, it completed its exit from the office and retail business in 2013. See Note 3 – Real
Estate Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. Roberts Realty does not currently own any operating multifamily communities
and did not own any operating multifamily communities in 2013. Roberts Realty had three reportable operating segments during 2013:
|
1.
|
the retail/office segment, which consisted of two operating retail centers and an office building
(see Note 3 – Real Estate Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations);
|
|
2.
|
the land segment, which consists of various tracts of land; and
|
|
3.
|
the corporate segment, which consists primarily of operating cash, cash equivalents, and miscellaneous
other assets.
|
The following tables summarize the
operating results and total assets of Roberts Realty’s reportable segments as of and for the three and six months ended June
30, 2014 and 2013. The retail/office segment was composed of the Bassett and Spectrum retail centers, along with the Northridge
Office Building. See Note 3 – Real Estate Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations for more detailed information.
The land segment is composed of (a) three tracts of land totaling 71 acres that are in various phases of development and construction,
and (b) two tracts of land held for sale totaling 11 acres. See Note 3 – Real Estate Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued
Operations and Note 11 – Subsequent Event. The corporate segment consists primarily of cash and cash equivalents, miscellaneous
other assets, and general and administrative expenses.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail/Office
|
|
Land
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues from consolidated entities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
179,620
|
|
|
|
324,195
|
|
|
|
503,815
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses from consolidated entities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
179,620
|
|
|
|
325,392
|
|
|
|
505,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(301,050
|
)
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
(299,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(480,670
|
)
|
|
|
(323,619
|
)
|
|
|
(804,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss from discontinued operations
(Note 3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(480,670
|
)
|
|
|
(323,619
|
)
|
|
|
(804,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(95,269
|
)
|
|
|
(64,141
|
)
|
|
|
(159,410
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss available for common shareholders
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(385,401
|
)
|
|
$
|
(259,478
|
)
|
|
$
|
(644,879
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at June 30, 2014
|
|
$
|
66,000
|
|
|
$
|
24,345,742
|
|
|
$
|
2,299,742
|
|
|
$
|
26,711,484
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail/Office
|
|
Land
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues from consolidated entities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
83,636
|
|
|
|
354,228
|
|
|
|
437,864
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses from consolidated entities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
83,636
|
|
|
|
354,405
|
|
|
|
438,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(153,212
|
)
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(153,101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(236,848
|
)
|
|
|
(354,288
|
)
|
|
|
(591,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss from discontinued operations
(Note 3)
|
|
|
(77,506
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(77,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss
|
|
|
(77,506
|
)
|
|
|
(236,848
|
)
|
|
|
(354,288
|
)
|
|
|
(668,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(11,866
|
)
|
|
|
(36,262
|
)
|
|
|
(54,241
|
)
|
|
|
(102,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss available for common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(65,640
|
)
|
|
$
|
(200,586
|
)
|
|
$
|
(300,047
|
)
|
|
$
|
(566,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at June 30, 2013
|
|
$
|
11,276,478
|
|
|
$
|
23,941,635
|
|
|
$
|
147,120
|
|
|
$
|
35,365,233
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail/Office
|
|
Land
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues from consolidated entities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
322,383
|
|
|
|
672,134
|
|
|
|
994,517
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses from consolidated entities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
322,383
|
|
|
|
673,515
|
|
|
|
995,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(593,773
|
)
|
|
|
4,710
|
|
|
|
(589,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(916,156
|
)
|
|
|
(662,842
|
)
|
|
|
(1,578,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss from discontinued operations
(Note 3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(916,156
|
)
|
|
|
(662,842
|
)
|
|
|
(1,578,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(182,132
|
)
|
|
|
(131,773
|
)
|
|
|
(313,905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss available for common shareholders
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(734,024
|
)
|
|
$
|
(531,069
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,265,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at June 30, 2014
|
|
$
|
66,000
|
|
|
$
|
24,345,742
|
|
|
$
|
2,299,742
|
|
|
$
|
26,711,484
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail/Office
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,587
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,587
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues from consolidated entities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,587
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
3,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
172,184
|
|
|
|
790,196
|
|
|
|
962,380
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses from consolidated entities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
172,184
|
|
|
|
790,465
|
|
|
|
962,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
890,037
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
890,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
721,440
|
|
|
|
(790,182
|
)
|
|
|
(68,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated loss from discontinued operations
(Note 3)
|
|
|
(153,255
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(153,255
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net (loss) income
|
|
|
(153,255
|
)
|
|
|
721,440
|
|
|
|
(790,182
|
)
|
|
|
(221,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(23,571
|
)
|
|
|
110,958
|
|
|
|
(121,530
|
)
|
|
|
(34,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated (loss) income available for common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(129,684
|
)
|
|
$
|
610,482
|
|
|
$
|
(668,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
(187,854
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at June 30, 2013
|
|
$
|
11,276,478
|
|
|
$
|
23,941,635
|
|
|
$
|
147,120
|
|
|
$
|
35,365,233
|
|
7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with the
Roberts Companies and Their Affiliates
Roberts Realty enters into contractual
commitments in the normal course of business with the Roberts Companies. The contracts between Roberts Realty and the Roberts Companies
relate to the development and construction of real estate assets, and from time to time, the acquisition or disposition of real
estate. The board of directors has adopted a policy that all conflicting interest transactions must be authorized by a majority
of the disinterested directors, but only if there are at least two directors who are disinterested with respect to the matter at
issue. Under the charter for the audit committee of Roberts Realty’s board of directors, related party transactions are also
subject to review and oversight by the audit committee.
Roberts Realty, its predecessor
limited partnerships, and other limited partnerships sponsored by Mr. Charles S. Roberts have previously entered into agreements
with Roberts Properties and Roberts Construction to provide these same services for 20 apartment communities with a total of 4,648
units that were sold for a total sales price of $431,701,143. All of these communities were sold for a substantial profit.
Design and Development Agreements
with Roberts Properties
. Roberts Properties provides various development services that include market studies; business plans;
assistance with permitting, land use and zoning issues, easements, and utility issues; as well as exterior design, finish selection,
and interior design. Roberts Realty has entered into a design and development agreement with Roberts Properties for the project
listed in the following table.
|
|
Total
Contract
Amount
|
|
Amounts
Incurred from
1/1/13 to 6/30/13
|
|
Amounts
Incurred from
1/1/14 to 6/30/14
|
|
Remaining
Contractual
Commitment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highway 20
|
|
|
$
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
87,500
|
|
|
$
|
302,500
|
|
Construction Contracts with
Roberts Construction.
Roberts Realty has entered into cost plus contracts with Roberts Construction for the Bradley Park, Northridge,
North Springs, and Highway 20 properties. Under these contracts, Roberts Realty will pay Roberts Construction the cost of constructing
the project plus 5% for overhead and 5% for profit. Progress payments are paid monthly to Roberts Construction based on the work
that has been completed. No amounts were incurred on these contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2014. The following table
lists the amounts incurred on these contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
|
|
Amounts
Incurred for
Labor and Materials
Costs from
1/1/13 to 6/30/13
|
|
Amounts
Incurred for
5% Profit and
5% Overhead from
1/1/13 to 6/30/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bradley Park
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Northridge
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
North Springs
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Highway 20
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
999
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
Other Payments.
At the
request of Roberts Realty, Roberts Construction performed repairs and maintenance on the land parcels, the retail centers, and
the office building, as well as tenant improvements for new leases at the retail centers. See Note 3 – Real Estate Assets
Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, Roberts Realty paid $139,525 and $84,800
in cost reimbursements to Roberts Construction for these services.
Roberts Realty entered into a
reimbursement arrangement for services provided by Roberts Properties, effective February 4, 2008, as amended January
1, 2014. Under the terms of this arrangement, Roberts Realty reimburses Roberts Properties the cost of providing consulting services
in an amount equal to an agreed-upon hourly billing rate for each employee multiplied by the number of hours that the employee
provided services to Roberts Realty. Roberts Realty believes that this reimbursement arrangement allows Roberts Realty to obtain
services from experienced and knowledgeable personnel without having to bear the cost of employing them on a full-time basis. Under
this arrangement, Roberts Realty incurred costs of $282,176 and $107,117 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The increase in 2014 was partially due to Roberts Properties providing additional services that replaced the services of a full-time
temporary contractor that Roberts Realty had retained for 2013, which resulted in a net savings to Roberts Realty. Additionally,
Roberts Properties received cost reimbursements of $23,505 and $5,643 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively
for operating costs and other expenses of Roberts Realty.
Office Leases.
During the
six months ended June 30, 2014, Roberts Realty did not lease any office space to the Roberts Companies and, accordingly, recognized
no rental income. On October 30, 2013, Roberts Realty sold its Northridge Office Building to the Fulton County Board of Education,
an unrelated third party, for $5,280,000. Prior to the sale, Roberts Realty leased office space in the Northridge Office Building
to the Roberts Companies. During 2013, Roberts Properties leased 4,431 rentable square feet and Roberts Construction leased 1,920
rentable square feet. Both leases had a rental rate of $17.00 per rentable square foot.
Roberts Realty recognized total
rental income from Roberts Properties and Roberts Construction of $53,984 for the six months ended June 30, 2013.
Sublease of Office Space.
On October 30, 2013, Roberts Realty sold its Northridge Office Building to the Fulton County Board of Education for $5,280,000
and paid off its $2,422,533 Northridge Office Building loan. This sale also reduced Roberts Realty’s negative operating cash
flow by approximately $210,000 per year. The Fulton County Board of Education will occupy 100% of the building and as a condition
of closing, required that Roberts Realty vacate the building by February 28, 2014, which was later extended to April 5, 2014. Consequently,
Roberts Realty was required to seek new office space in another building. On February 19, 2014, Roberts Realty entered into a sublease
for 1,817 square feet of office space with Roberts Capital Partners, LLC. The sublease had a commencement date of April 7, 2014.
Roberts Capital Partners, LLC is owned by Mr. Charles S. Roberts, Roberts Realty’s Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer, and President. The rental rates and lease term are the same rental rates and lease term that Roberts Capital Partners,
LLC has with KBS SOR Northridge LLC, the unrelated third party owner of the building. Roberts Capital Partners, LLC is liable to
the building owner for the full three-year term of its lease; however, Roberts Realty negotiated a 90-day right to terminate its
sublease as described below. The sublease has a three-year term, with a one-year option, which provides for rental rates of $16.50
per square foot in Year 1, $17.25 per square foot in Year 2, $18.00 per square foot in Year 3, and $18.75 per square foot for the
Year 4 option. Roberts Realty has the right to terminate the sublease upon 90 days notice by paying (a) a minimum of 12 months
of rent under the sublease, plus (b) an early termination amount, which will be the lesser of (x) the next 12 months of rent due
under the sublease or (y) the remaining amounts due under the term of the sublease, as calculated on the early termination
date. Roberts Realty believes the favorable terms of its sublease provides it with significant flexibility in successfully implementing
its business plan. Roberts Realty paid a security deposit of $20,577 upon the execution of the lease and has paid $9,494 in rent
during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Release of Restrictive Covenant
on Peachtree Parkway Property.
On February 7, 2013, Roberts Realty sold 20.6 acres of the Peachtree Parkway property to Lennar
Multifamily Investors, LLC (“Lennar”), an unrelated third party, for $7,590,000. When Roberts Realty purchased the
Peachtree Parkway property in December 2004, it assumed and became bound by a pre-existing restrictive covenant on the property
that was already recorded in the Gwinnett County, Georgia real estate records (the “Restrictive Covenant”) in favor
of Roberts Construction. The Restrictive Covenant provided that if the owner of the Peachtree Parkway property developed it for
residential use, Roberts Construction would be engaged as the general contractor for the project on a cost plus basis and would
be paid the cost of constructing the project plus 5% overhead and 5% profit. Lennar informed Roberts Realty that it would not use
Roberts Construction as the general contractor. The sales contract stated that Lennar would not enter into the sales contract unless
the Restrictive Covenant was terminated no later than the closing date at no cost to Lennar. After being advised by Lennar of this
requirement, the audit committee of Roberts Realty’s board of directors negotiated with Roberts Construction for the release
of the Restrictive Covenant. Roberts Construction agreed in the sales contract to give up its contractual rights to be the general
contractor for the project and to release the Restrictive Covenant on the closing date for a payment of $500,000 from the purchase
price to be paid by Lennar. On February 7, 2013, the closing occurred and Roberts Construction received the payment for
releasing the Restrictive Covenant. Roberts Realty used the remaining $7,000,200 of the sale proceeds to repay the Peachtree Parkway
loan and recorded a $1,214,192 gain on the sale.
|
8.
|
IMPAIRMENT LOSS ON REAL ESTATE ASSETS
|
Roberts Realty periodically evaluates
its real estate assets, on a property-by-property basis, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 360-10,
Property, Plant, and Equipment
–
Overall
.
FASB ASC Topic 360-10 requires
impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations and land parcels when indicators of impairment are present
and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. The
expected future cash flows depend on estimates made by management, including (1) changes in the national, regional, and/or local
economic climates, (2) rental rates, (3) competition, (4) operating costs, (5) occupancy, (6) holding period, and (7) an estimated
construction budget. A change in the assumptions used to determine future economic events could result in an adverse change in
the value of a property and cause an impairment to be recorded in the future. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, actual
results could differ materially from those estimates. Roberts Realty’s determination of fair value is based on a discounted
future cash flow analysis, which incorporates available market information as well as other assumptions made by Roberts Realty’s
management, evaluation of appraisals, and other applicable valuation techniques. Because the factors Roberts Realty’s management
uses in generating these cash flows are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter its assumptions, Roberts
Realty may not achieve the discounted or undiscounted future operating and residual cash flows it estimates in its impairment analyses
or those established by appraisals, and Roberts Realty may be required to recognize future impairment losses on its properties
held for use.
Non-Cash Impairments on Operating
Real Estate Assets
. Roberts Realty had no operating assets during the 2014 period. As of June 30, 2013, Roberts Realty determined
that the carrying amounts of its operating real estate assets were recoverable and, accordingly, did not record an impairment loss
on its operating assets during the period. See Note 3 – Real Estate Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.
Non-Cash Impairments on Land
Parcels
. As of June 30, 2014 and 2013, Roberts Realty determined that the carrying amount of its land parcels was recoverable.
Accordingly, Roberts Realty did not record an impairment loss on its land parcels during either of these periods.
9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FASB ASC Topic 820,
Fair Value
Measurement and Disclosures
, defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. The objective of fair
value is to determine the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset. FASB ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels:
|
·
|
Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that
are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities;
|
|
·
|
Level 2 – observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted
in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and
|
|
·
|
Level 3 – unobservable inputs that are used when little or
no market data is available.
|
The fair value hierarchy gives
the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, Roberts Realty uses
valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible.
Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret Level 2 and 3 inputs in determining fair value of financial and non-financial assets
and liabilities. Accordingly, the fair values presented in the financial statements may not reflect the amounts ultimately realized
on a sale or other disposition of these assets. Roberts Realty held no assets required to be measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Assets measured at fair value
on a nonrecurring basis consist of real estate assets that have incurred non-cash impairment losses so that their carrying value
is equal to or less than their estimated fair value. These real estate assets, including land held for sale, are valued using sales
activity for similar assets, current offers and contracts, and using inputs management believes are consistent with those that
unrelated market participants would use. The fair values of these assets are determined using widely accepted valuation techniques,
including (1) discounted cash flow analysis, which considers, among other things, sales assumptions, cost structure and discount
rates, and (2) comparable sales activity. The valuation technique and related inputs vary with the specific facts and circumstances
of each real estate asset. Roberts Realty held no assets required to be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June
30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Roberts Realty has entered into
various contracts for the development and construction of its real estate assets. The contracts with Roberts Properties and Roberts
Construction are described in Note 7 – Related Party Transactions. The construction contracts require Roberts Realty
to pay Roberts Construction the labor and materials costs of the project plus 5% overhead and 5% profit.
Roberts Realty has also entered
into architectural and engineering contracts with unrelated third parties for the Bradley Park and Northridge apartment communities.
At June 30, 2014, outstanding commitments on these contracts totaled $334,818.
Roberts Realty and the operating
partnership are subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the resolution
of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the final outcome of these matters will not have
a material adverse effect on Roberts Realty’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
As a result of the mergers of
various predecessor limited partnerships into the operating partnership, the former partners of those predecessor limited partnerships
received operating partnership units. Holders of units have the right to require the operating partnership to redeem their units
for shares, subject to certain conditions. Upon submittal of units for redemption, the operating partnership will have the option
either (a) to pay cash for those units at their fair market value, which will be based upon the then current trading price of the
shares, or (b) to acquire those units in exchange for shares (on a 1.647-for-one basis). Roberts Realty has adopted a policy that
it will issue shares in exchange for all future units submitted for redemption. At June 30, 2014, there were 1,508,519 units outstanding
that could be exchanged for 2,484,565 shares, subject to certain conditions.
Under Roberts Realty’s
bylaws, it is obligated to indemnify its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences arising as a result of its officers
and directors serving in these capacities. The maximum potential amount of future payments Roberts Realty could be required to
make under this indemnification arrangement is unlimited. Roberts Realty currently has a directors and officers liability insurance
policy that may limit its exposure and enable it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. Because of the insurance policy
coverage, Roberts Realty believes the estimated fair value of this indemnification arrangement is minimal, and accordingly, Roberts
Realty has recorded no liabilities for this indemnification arrangement as of June 30, 2014.
Under various federal, state,
and local environmental laws and regulations, Roberts Realty may be required to investigate and clean up the effects of hazardous
or toxic substances at its properties, including properties that have previously been sold. The preliminary environmental assessments
of Roberts Realty’s current properties have not revealed any environmental liability that Roberts Realty believes would have
a material adverse effect on its business, assets, or results of operations, nor is Roberts Realty aware of any such environmental
liability.
11.
SUBSEQUENT
EVENT
Sale of Johns Creek Commercial
Site
. On July 17, 2014, Roberts Realty sold its 1.3-acre Johns Creek commercial site for $700,000, and its book value was $500,000.
Roberts Realty used the net sale proceeds of $690,364 to pay down its $2,565,000 Highway 20 land loan, which reduced the outstanding
principal balance of that loan to $1,874,636. Roberts Realty expects to recognize a gain on the sale of approximately $195,100.