Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Texas Gulf Energy, Incorporated (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. Intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements required to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include all information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. However, the information furnished reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments and other adjustments described herein that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the
results for the interim periods.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 included in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended. The Company’s business is cyclical due to the scope and
timing of projects implemented by its customer base, who are primarily in the energy sector. Planned maintenance projects at many
of the Company’s customers’ facilities are typically scheduled in the Spring and the Fall, when the demand for energy
is lower. The Company’s business can also be affected by seasonal weather conditions, including hurricanes, snowstorms, abnormally
low or high temperatures or other inclement weather, which can result in reduced activities. Accordingly, results for any interim
period may not necessarily be indicative of results for the fiscal year or future operating results.
Going Concern
The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis, which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business
for the foreseeable future. The Company has incurred losses resulting in an accumulated deficit of $1,631,290 as of June
30, 2014, and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business, raising substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating
profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities
arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve
months with existing cash on hand, loans and or private placements of common stock.
Taxes
The effective tax rate was 37% for the six months ended June
30, 2014 from a benefit of 32% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 due to the Company recording a change in the valuation allowance
increasing the allowance to 100% for the period ended June 30, 2014. The Company recorded an income tax expense of $370,225 and
benefit of $516,689 for the periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Note 2 – Recently Issued Statements of Financial Accounting
Standards
The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements
that are in effect and that may impact its unaudited consolidated financial statements. The Company does not believe that
there are any new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
Note 3 – Convertible Debt
Fishbone Notes
On February 3, 2012, the Company issued two convertible promissory
notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $1,283,126 (the “Notes”), to the owners of Fishbone Solutions, Ltd. (“Fishbone”),
in exchange for all of the equity interests in Fishbone. On the closing date of the acquisition of Fishbone, the Company issued
the Notes to the equity-holders of Fishbone in the proportional principal amounts directed by the equity-holders. The Notes accrue
interest at the rate of 0.19% per annum, and the principal and accrued interest of the Notes are payable only through the conversion
of the Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $ 0.00001 per share (“Common Stock”), at $0.12
per share.
Pursuant to the terms of the Notes, the Fishbone equity-holders
agreed to limit conversions and sales of the Common Stock issued by the Company upon conversion of the Notes as follows:
(a)
|
No conversions or sales until the one year anniversary of the issuance of the Notes (February 3, 2013);
|
(b)
|
No more than fifteen percent (15%) of the principal amount and accrued interest of each Note from the one year anniversary through the day before the two year anniversary of the issuance of the Notes (February 3, 2014);
|
(c)
|
An additional fifteen percent (15%) from the two year anniversary until the day before the three year anniversary of the issuance of the Notes; (February 3, 2015); and
|
(d)
|
The entire remaining balance of principal and accrued interest and unpaid interest becoming due, and the Notes automatically converting, on the three year anniversary of issuance of the Notes, at which time all limitations on sale by the holders of the Notes will be lifted.
|
The Notes may also become due and fully convertible in the event
of a liquidation event or change of control of the Company. During 2013, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of Fishbone
and two other subsidiaries of the Company, pursuant to which the buyer assumed $597,000 in principal amount of the Notes and $103,649
in principal amount the Notes, plus accrued interest of $2,087, was converted into Common Stock at $0.12 per share. On February
6, 2014, the Company issued 1,861,240 shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of $223,349 in principal and $103 in accrued interest
of the remaining Note.
The Company’s outstanding convertible debt was $362,622
as of June 30, 2014 and $585,971 as of December 31, 2013.
Note 4 - Lines of Credit
On February 29, 2012, International Plant Services, LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company (“IPS”), entered into an accounts receivable purchase and sale agreement with a merchant
bank, under which the merchant bank allowed IPS to draw up to $3 million. This facility was most recently renewed on May 1, 2014,
with the merchant bank now allowing IPS up to $500,000 in availability. Under the purchase and sale agreement, IPS can sell all
right, title and interest in its accounts receivables to the merchant bank for the total face amount of the receivable invoices
purchased, less a discount of 15%. Upon collection of a sold receivable, the merchant bank remits a rebate to IPS of between 10%
and 14.30% of the receivable invoice face amount, depending on how long it takes to collect the receivable. The sooner a purchased
receivable is collected, the greater the rebate received by IPS. If a receivable is not collected within 90 days, IPS may be required
to repurchase the unpaid receivable for a price of $0.90 for each $1.00 invoiced. The Company has guaranteed all of the obligations
of IPS under the facility. As of June 30, 2014, the balance due under the purchase agreement was $247,343, and $252,657 was available.
This agreement can be terminated at any time with written notice by IPS or by the merchant bank without written notice.
On September 18, 2013, the Company entered into a receivable
purchase and sale agreement with the same merchant bank, under which the merchant allowed the Company to draw up to $1.5 million.
Under the purchase and sale agreement, the Company can sell all rights, title and interests in its accounts receivables, which
do not include the IPS receivables, for the face amount of the receivable invoices purchased, less a discount of 15%. Upon collection
of a sold receivable, the merchant bank was required to remit a rebate to the Company of an amount between 10% and 14.30% of the
receivable invoice face amount, depending on how long it takes to collect the receivable. The sooner a purchased receivable is
collected, the greater the rebate received by the Company. If a receivable is not collected within 90 days, the Company may be
required to repurchase the receivables for $.90 for each $1.00 invoiced. This facility was most recently renewed on May 1, 2014,
but the Company has no outstanding balances as of June 30, 2014.
Note 5 - Notes Payable
The Company assumed a $422,529 loan due to a former shareholder
of Fishbone in 2012 that matured in June 2013. That loan was paid in full as of June 30, 2014.
The Company financed the purchase of its insurance coverage
with a loan with an annual interest rate of 4.45%. That loan was paid in full as of June 30, 2014.
On January 1, 2012, the Company entered into a three year consulting
agreement with a consultant. The consulting agreement provides for compensation to the consultant of $12,000 per month for the
remainder of the term of the agreement, even if the agreement is terminated by the consultant under certain circumstances. The
consultant terminated the agreement in December 2013, and demanded payment for the remaining term of the agreement. As a result,
even though the Company disputes the basis for such payment and believes that it may have claims against the consultant to offset
such amount, the Company recorded a note payable of $144,000 on December 31, 2013, of which there is a balance of $96,000 as of
June 30, 2014.
Note 6 - Stock Based Compensation
The Company charged stock based compensation cost against income
in the amount of $186,300 and $373,170 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, for vesting of shares
of Common Stock awarded by the Company during prior year.
Note 7 – Earnings (Loss)
Per Share
Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed
by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods
presented. The calculation of basic earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2014 includes the weighted average of
common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings
of an entity, such as convertible preferred stock or convertible debt. Dilutive securities existed for the six months ended June
30, 2014 in the form of 10,000,000 Series B Preferred Stock, convertible into 58,823,529 shares of Common Stock and a convertible
note of $362,622, convertible at $0.12 per share into 3,021,850 shares of Common Stock, which could have a dilutive effect on loss
per share. However, in periods where losses are reported, the weighted-average number of shares outstanding excludes equivalents,
because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Note 8 – Contingencies
Various legal actions, claims, and other contingencies arise
in the normal course of our business. Contingencies are recorded in the consolidated financial statements, or are otherwise disclosed,
in accordance with ASC 450-20, “Loss Contingencies”. Specific reserves are provided for loss contingencies to the extent
we conclude that a loss is both probable and estimable. We use a case-by-case evaluation of the underlying data and update our
evaluation as further information becomes known, and the known claims as of this date are as follows:
Civil Action 4:12-CV-00055; Renato Acain
et al vs. International Plant Services LLC et al.
IPS was sued by fifty-five (55) Filipino workers, alleging violations
of RICO and other fiduciary errors. The suit was instituted on May 27, 2011, and subsequently removed to the United States District
Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division on January 6, 2012. The plaintiffs are seeking relief in the form of unspecified
monetary relief. The United States District Court remanded the case to the 113
th
District Court of Texas on September
15, 2012. Subsequently, the judge in the 113
th
District Court dismissed the case. The plaintiffs appealed the dismissal
to the Texas Court of Appeals, First District. The matter was submitted on April 29, 2014, with no oral argument permitted. The
court has yet to issue a ruling. The Company believes this lawsuit is without merit.
Cause No. 4:13-cv-00505, Michael Rushing, Stephanie Rushing,
Penn Rushing and Florence Rushing v. Texas Gulf Energy, Inc. on behalf of CS Bankers V, LLC, Texas Gulf Fabricators, Inc., David
Mathews, Craig Crawford and Timothy Connolly, United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
The Company originally filed for a Declaratory Judgment against
the Rushings, alleging that the Rushings failed to perform relative to a letter of intent with Texas Gulf Fabricators, Inc., or
alternatively, that the letter of intent was not enforceable. The Company also filed a conversion action against the Rushings
for removing property from a fabrication facility. The Rushing family filed two separate counterclaims in the underlying
state court actions before removing both actions to federal court in March 2013. On April 13, 2013, the Federal Court denied
jurisdiction and remanded the matter back to the 270
th
District Court of Harris County, Texas in proceedings known as:
(i) Cause No. 2013-00543; Texas Gulf Energy, Inc. on behalf of CS Bankers V, LLC and Texas Gulf Fabricators, Inc. vs. Penn Rushing,
et al and (ii) Cause No. 2013-004690; Texas Gulf Energy, Inc. vs. Penn Rushing, et al. The matters were recently consolidated in
Cause No. 2013-004690. The Rushings' allegations include fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary
duty, conversion, equitable estoppel and securities law violations.
These claims relate to a letter of intent and foreclosure
proceeding on a fabrication shop in Baytown, Texas. The Rushings have not disclosed the amount of damages sought. The Company
may be required to pay for the defense of former employees of the Company and a former consultant to the Company who are named
defendants in the suit. The Company believes the Rushing's claims are without merit and intends to pursue its claims and defenses
vigorously.
Based on the Company’s knowledge as of the date of this
filing, the Company believes that any amounts exceeding its recorded accruals should not materially affect its financial position,
results of operations or liquidity. It is the opinion of management that the eventual resolution of the above claims is unlikely
to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or operating results. However, the results of litigation
are inherently unpredictable and the possibility exists that the ultimate resolution of one or more of these matters could result
in a negative material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
The Company has received notification that a legal action has
been initiated with the Republic of the Philippines, Department of Labor and Employment, National Labor Relations Commissions by
Benjamin A. Villejo against IPS, MBC Human Resources Corporation (“MBC”), a Philippines corporation, and Nida P. Sarmiento,
President of MBC. The action alleges that wages and food allowances are owed to Mr. Villejo. MBC is majority owned and controlled
by Noureddine Ayed and Karim Ayed, who are majority shareholders of the Company. IPS and the Company have agreements with MBC to
provide the training and processing of guest workers from the Philippines and to pay MBC a fee based upon hours worked by the guest
workers. The Company believes that Mr. Villejo’s claim is without merit and intends to vigorously defend IPS.
Note 9 – Related Party Transactions
The Company's two majority owners as of June 30, 2014 maintain
a 74.8 % voting control of the Company. The Company utilizes corporations owned by the majority stockholders to provide certain
services to the Company, which include the following:
|
•
|
Testing
|
|
•
|
Recruiting
|
|
•
|
Mobilization
|
|
•
|
Training
|
|
•
|
Lodging
|
|
•
|
Facilities
|
|
•
|
Foreign payroll
|
Management believes that the amounts
paid for these services are at or below those rates that the Company would pay to unrelated third parties and that the interests
of the Company’s stockholders are best served by continuing to use these services provided by these companies.
The Company primarily utilizes a foreign company affiliated
by common ownership for testing, recruiting, mobilization and training the Company’s foreign workforce for construction projects.
The Company pays $ 1.40 per hour billed by these employees for all of these services. Total charges these services for the six
months ended June 30, 2014 was $2,600.
Note 10 – Significant Customers
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company derived
a significant amount of revenue from three customers, comprising 29%, 27%, and 14% of the total revenue for the period, respectively, compared
to three customers during the six months ended June 30, 2013, comprising 14%, 10%, and 8% of the total revenue for the period,
respectively.
Note 11 – Dispositions
On November 22, 2013, the Company closed
a disposition pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, two of its subsidiaries
at the time, Fishbone Solutions, Inc. (“FSI”) and Texas Gulf Industrial Services, Inc. (“TGIS”), and TGE
Industrial Services, LLC (the “Buyer”). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company sold substantially all
of the assets of FSI and TGIS to the Buyer.
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2014
|
|
|
June 30,
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
7,954,254
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
859,083
|
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
859,083
|
|