UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC
20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x |
ANNUAL
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 |
or
¨ |
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition
period from _______________.to _______________.
Commission file number
000-54074
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS,
INC.
(Exact name of Registrant
as specified in its charter)
Nevada |
|
26-0685980 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
16795 Von Karman
Avenue, Suite 240
Irvine, CA 92606
(Address of principal
executive offices - Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone
number, including area code: 949-525-4634
Securities registered
pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered
pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock
Indicate
by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
¨ No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x
No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No
¨
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference
in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨ |
Accelerated filer ¨ |
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨ (Do not
check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No
x
The aggregate market value of the common
stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $15,389,340 as of the end of the Registrant's second fiscal quarter
(based on the closing sale price for the common stock on the OTC Markets on June 30, 2014). For purposes of this disclosure, shares
of common stock held or controlled by executive officers and directors of the Registrant and by persons who hold more than 5%
of the outstanding shares of common stock have been treated as shares held by affiliates. However, such treatment should not be
construed as an admission that any such person is an “affiliate” of the Registrant. The Registrant has no non-voting
common equity.
As of March 26, 2015, there were 13,943,108 shares of the Registrant's
common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED
BY REFERENCE
None.
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report includes forward-looking statements.
We have based these statements on our beliefs and assumptions, which we base on information currently available to us. These forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible
or assumed future results of operations, our total market opportunity and our business plans and objectives set forth under the
sections entitled "Business" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees
of performance. Our future results and requirements may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.
Many of the factors that will determine these results and requirements are beyond our control. In addition to the risks and uncertainties
discussed in "Business" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,"
investors should consider those discussed under "Risk Factors."
These forward-looking statements speak
only as of the date of this report. We do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in
our business, anticipated results of our operations, strategy or planned capital expenditures, or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
Item 1. Business
History
The Company was organized on August 7,
2007 under the laws of the State of Nevada, as Fashion Net, Inc. whose business was to act as a fashion marketing/consulting
company for specialty apparel goods. On June 30, 2010, the Board of Directors determined to change the direction of the Company’s
business to develop a search and recommendation engine for mobile web sites and native mobile applications. In connection with
this change of direction, on April 12, 2010, the Company changed its name to “Mimvi, Inc.”
Adaptive Media Acquisition and Merger
On July 1, 2013 (the “Closing Date”),
Mimvi, Inc., entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) whereby the Company’s wholly
owned subsidiary, Adaptive Media Acquisition Co., Inc., an Oregon corporation, merged with and into Adaptive Media, Inc., an Oregon
corporation (“Adaptive Media”) formed on May 14, 2012, Adaptive Media was engaged in the business of Internet, mobile,
and video advertising (the “Merger”). On the Closing Date, the parties executed all documents and filed the Plan of
Merger with the Oregon Secretary of State. Upon consummation of the Merger, the Adaptive Media shareholders were issued 1,116,667
shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Mimvi constituting approximately 29.9% of the outstanding stock of the
Company, and Mimvi shareholders retained approximately 70.1% of the Company.
Following the Merger, the Company changed
its name to Adaptive Medias, Inc. on November 6, 2013 in order to better and more fully emphasis the Company’s mission of
providing a complete, end-to-end supply-side platform for mobile, desktop video and online display advertising and the wind-down
of the former Mimvi initiatives. In connection with the name change, effective on November 19, 2013, the Company’s ticker
symbol was changed to ADTM.
Ember Acquisition and Merger
On December 4, 2013, the Company, entered
into an Agreement and Plan of Merger whereby the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Ember Acquisition Co., Inc., a Delaware
corporation, merged with and into Ember, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ember”). Upon consummation of the Merger,
the Ember shareholders were issued 233,334 shares of common stock, constituting approximately 5.3% of the outstanding stock of
the Company. The Merger caused Ember to become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Ember acquisition included ad-server
and real-time-bidding technology and the employment of Ember’s engineers.
Media Graph Acquisition and Merger
On July 15, 2014, the Company executed
a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with OneScreen, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“OneScreen”),
Media Graph, Inc., a Nevada corporation and OneScreen’s spun-off former subsidiary (“Media Graph”), and the
shareholders of Media Graph (the “Selling Shareholders”), effective June 30, 2014, whereby the Company acquired certain
assets of OneScreen, which immediately prior thereto were held by Media Graph, in exchange for 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock (the “Acquisition”). On July 15, 2014, the parties to the Agreement executed the First Amendment to the
Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Amendment”), which (i) amended the effective date of the Agreement to July 15, 2014,
(ii) limited the scope of Section 5.04 of the Agreement to apply only to the Restricted Selling Shareholders, as defined in the
Amendment, and (iii) added the Selling Shareholders as a signatory to the Agreement.
Reverse Stock Split
On April 14, 2014, the shareholders of
the Company authorized its Board of Directors to effectuate a reverse stock split, in the Board’s discretion (the “Reverse
Stock Split”), which was ultimately declared effective by the Board of Directors as of the close of business on July 14,
2014. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, every 30 issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock was changed
and converted into one share of common stock. Following the Reverse Stock Split, the Company continues to have 300,000,000 shares
of common stock authorized for issuance, but the number of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock was reduced
from 192,364,735 shares to 6,412,225 shares. As required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB”) Accounting
Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 260-10-55-12 “Earnings per Share” all share and per-share
computations presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the accompanying consolidated financial statements are based on
the new number of shares after the Reverse Stock Split.
Overview
Adaptive Medias, Inc. is a technology
company based in Irvine, CA that focuses on providing digital video and mobile solutions for publishers, video content owners
who need an easy, efficient, centralized solution for video content management, delivery, syndication and one of the only end-to-end
monetization platforms driven by programmatic algorithms. The platform offers an HTML5 (Fully Responsive)/Flash-friendly video
player but is player agnostic and provides premium content for publishers who need digital video to offer to their audiences or
to supplement their video libraries. The Company grew organically and through three acquisitions over the past 18 months and has
now integrated the different platforms that were acquired.
We believe that Adaptive Medias, through
its core platform and technology enables its customers to provide their audiences with mobile experiences and premium video content
and to monetize those audiences by serving and optimizing relevant brand advertisements while maintaining the user experience.
Our operations are organized into a single
reportable segment. During our most recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, we generated net revenues of $5,075,226 and a
net loss of $18,849,726 (and a net loss of $7,553,175 before charges related to the depreciation and amortization, impairment
of goodwill and intangibles and stock-based compensation).
See Item 8 of Part II for more information
on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and our consolidated statements of operations, statements
of stockholders' equity (deficit), and statements of cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2014.
Our fiscal year end is December 31. Our corporate headquarters as of March 26, 2015 are located at 16795 Von Karman Avenue, Suite
240, Irvine, California 92606. Our website address is www.adaptivem.com. The information contained on or that may be obtained
from our website is not a part of this report.
Industry Overview
Consumers and audiences are increasingly watching video on
mobile devices:
| · | According
to eMarketer two-thirds of the U.S. population watches digital video and
the time spent watching digital video is growing aggressively
(+56% year over year). |
| · | Cisco
projects that in four years, 75% of the world’s mobile traffic will be video. |
Advertisers and marketers are following this growth.
| · | According
to eMarketer the share of US cross-device digital video ad campaigns rose from just 17%
to 51% between the first quarter of 2014 and the fourth quarter of 2014. |
| · | eMarketer
also estimates that mobile ad spending will reach $64 billion during 2015 with a target
of $158 billion by 2018. |
Business Overview
Adaptive Medias, Inc: focuses on providing
digital video and mobile technology and service solutions for publishers and content owners who need an easy, efficient, centralized
solution for video content management, delivery, syndication and monetization. The platform offers an HTML5 (Fully Responsive)/Flash-friendly
Video Player but is player agnostic and provides premium content for publishers who need digital video to offer to their audiences
or to supplement their video libraries.
Customers pay a fee for the core Media
Graph platform which allows the customer to upload and encode content and then store, manage, program and serve that content to
their audiences. In addition, the core platform allows Adaptive Medias to provide the following options and supporting services:
| · | The
platform comes with a video player or the customer can use its player. The Company’s
proprietary mobile-first player was designed for mobile devices, as compared to players
that were originally designed as a desktop video player and then repurposed. |
| · | The
platform services allow the customer to use the customer’s own advertising relationships,
supplement those advertising campaigns with Adaptive Medias advertising orders or have
Adaptive Medias fully-manage the advertising process on the customer’s behalf. |
| · | The
platform provides content syndication and audience buying services – for content
owners that may have unfilled advertising campaigns and need additional reach. |
| · | In
addition, if publishers need premium video content or need to supplement their libraries
with additional video content, Adaptive Medias platform provides the ability to select
from collections of content or to license the content from other third parties. |
Competition
Publishers and video content owners that
want to engage audiences across mobile and other devices with video experiences are challenged with fragmented technology solutions
and providers. They often have to acquire a content management system, content delivery network, desktop video player, mobile
video player, an adserver, and ads from adnetworks or advertising exchanges via real-time-bidding (RTB) technology from multiple
vendors and they may also incur other internal costs and inefficiencies to integrate the services so that they will continue working
together.
As a result many vendors in the market
provide components of the Adaptive Medias platform without providing the entire simplified platform or providing a video player
that is mobile-first, that is designed for mobile devices and able to self-adapt to the particular mobile device the individual
is using.
Our competitors include companies that
provide online video players such as JW Player, CMS platform and desktop video players such as Ooyala and BrightCove, adserver
and advertising network and service providers such as Tremor Video and FreeWheel, content delivery network providers such as Akamai,
and video content licensing services such as NDM or AOL.
While we believe that the end-to-end solution
provided by our Media Graph platform competes well with the products and services offered by these competitors, many of our competitors
are more established in the industry than we are and have greater financial and personnel resources than we do. We do not represent
a significant competitive presence in the industry.
Business Development
Our business development efforts are focused
on three main areas:
| · | publishers
and content owners that have video content and need an easy, efficient, centralized technology
platform solution for video content management, delivery, syndication and monetization; |
| · | white-label
partners of websites that provide desktop or display-oriented advertising services to
hundreds or thousands of websites and that need to provide a technology platform with
video solutions or mobile solutions to supplement the services they currently provide
to their website owners; and |
| · | syndication
partners that have branded video content (i.e. video sponsored by or produced by brand
advertisers) that need a player and platform to syndicate the content and reach additional
audiences. |
Separately but related, we focus on having
relationships with Advertising Networks and Exchanges to assist our Publishers and Content owners in monetizing their content
and audiences.
Recent Changes to Management
Effective as of January 26, 2015, Qayed
Shareef was terminated by the Board of Directors from his positions as Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, due
to pending criminal charges against Mr. Shareef and his inability to effectively continue to perform his obligations. Effective
as of March 11, 2015, Omar Akram was appointed as our President and Chief Financial Officer.
Employees
As of March 26, 2015, the Company had
approximately 30 employees and several consultants.
Intellectual Properties &
Licenses
Our success and ability to compete are
substantially dependent upon our internally developed technology and expertise.
We rely on patent, copyright, trade secret,
and trademark law to protect our technology. We currently have one provisional patent application pending. We also believe that
factors such as the technological and creative skills of our personnel, and new product developments and enhancements are essential
to establishing and maintaining a technology leadership position. There can be no assurance that others will not develop technologies
that are similar or superior to our technology.
Our success will depend in part upon our
ability to protect our intellectual property rights. We cannot be certain that other parties will not contest our intellectual
property rights.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following important factors, and
the factors described elsewhere in this report or in our other filings with the SEC, could affect (and in some cases have affected)
our business, operations, financial results or financial condition and could cause our results of operations to be materially
different from estimates or expectations. Other risks and uncertainties, of which we are currently unaware may also affect our
results or operations adversely.
An investment in our securities is highly
speculative in nature and involves an extremely high degree of risk. A prospective investor should consider the possibility of
the loss of the investor's entire investment and evaluate all information about us and the risk factors discussed below in relation
to his financial circumstances before investing in our securities.
Risks Related to the Company's Operations
Our intellectual property is valuable,
and our inability to protect it could reduce the value of our products, services, and brand.
We currently do not have patents for any
of our technology. Although we seek to obtain patent protection for our innovations, it is possible we may not be able to protect
some of these innovations. Furthermore, there is always the possibility, despite our efforts, that the scope of the protection
gained will be insufficient or that an issued patent may be deemed invalid or unenforceable. The efforts we have taken to protect
our proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective.
Any significant impairment of our intellectual
property rights could harm our business and our ability to compete. Also, protecting our intellectual property rights may be costly
and time consuming. Any increase in the unauthorized use of our intellectual property could make it more expensive to do business
and harm our operating results.
We have limited financial resources
and are dependent on raising additional funds to support future operations.
As of December 31, 2014, we had $2,255,784
in cash and $4,072,155 in total current assets and we had total current liabilities of $4,649,595. The latter represents the total
amount of accounts payable and accrued expenses that we owed and which are due for payment as of December 31, 2014. We have limited
funds to pay all of our current liabilities. Should one or more of our creditors demand immediate payment in-full, we are not
likely to have the resources to pay or satisfy any such claims. If the Company cannot continue to raise additional funds it could
face a risk of insolvency.
We have incurred continued operating
losses and we lack a history of operations upon which an investor can assess our business and plans.
For the year ended December 31, 2014,
we incurred $18,849,726 in net losses and $8,462,981 in net losses for the year ended December 31, 2013. We anticipate that we
will likely incur significant additional losses in the future as well.
Our insolvent financial condition also may create a risk that
we may be forced to file for protection under applicable bankruptcy laws or state insolvency statutes. We also may face the risk
that a receiver may be appointed. We face that risk and other risks resulting from our current financial condition.
For these and other reasons, we anticipate
that unless we can obtain sufficient capital from an outside source and do so in the very near future, we may be unable to continue
to operate as a corporation, continue to meet our filing obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise satisfy
our obligations to our stock transfer agent, our accountants, our legal counsel, our EDGAR filing agent, and many others.
For these and other reasons, our management
recognizes the adverse difficulties and continuing severe challenges we face. Apart from the funds that we have raised during
the year ended December 31, 2014, we have no committed source of financing and there can be no assurance that we will receive
any additional financing or funding from any source or if any financing should be obtained, that existing shareholders will not
incur substantial, immediate, and permanent dilution of their existing investment.
Going Concern Uncertainties
As of December 31, 2014, we have only
limited working capital with which to pursue our business plan. The amount of capital required to sustain operations until we
achieve positive cash flow from operations is subject to future events and uncertainties. It will be necessary for us to secure
additional working capital through sales of our common stock and/or debt financing, and there can be no assurance that such funding
will be available in the future. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
As of and for the years ended December
31, 2014 and 2013, our independent registered public accounting firm has issued a going concern qualification as part of their
audit report included herein and included in our 2014 consolidated financial statements.
Our common stock is subordinate to
existing and future debt.
All of our common stock is and will remain
subordinate to the claims of our existing and future creditors. As of December 31, 2014, we had $ 4,686,991 reflected as total
liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. These existing claims together with likely additional debts, obligations, and other
commitments that we give to others in the future, will be superior to any rights and interests of our stockholders.
Significant control of the Company
is held by management and principal shareholders.
Our officers, directors and principal
stockholders (greater than 5% stockholders) collectively control approximately 45% of our common shares (including stock options
and warrants) as of March 26, 2015. As a result, any person who acquires our common shares will likely have little or no ability
to influence or control the Company.
Due to a limited public market our
common stock may not be easily sold.
There is a limited trading market for
our common shares, and there is no guarantee that a continuous liquid trading market will develop. All of our common shares are
traded only on the OTC Bulletin Board and the OTCQB and there can be no assurance that the common shares will ever gain any liquid
trading volumes in any other market or gain listing on any stock exchange.
Our business is difficult to evaluate
because we have a limited operating history.
We have a history of operating losses and we have incurred
significant net losses in each of the last two years. . For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had net revenues of
$5,075,226 and $1,030,267 and incurred net losses of $18,849,726 and $8,462,981, respectively. These losses, among other things,
have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, stockholders’ equity,
net current assets and working capital.
We will need to generate significant additional
revenue and/or cost reductions to achieve profitability. While management believes that we may achieve profitability in the future,
there can be no assurance that we will do so. Our ability to generate and sustain significant additional revenues or achieve profitability
will depend upon numerous factors outside of our control, including sales of our advertising and software products and reduction
of our debt obligations.
Our stock price is likely to be highly
volatile because of several factors, including a limited public float.
The market price of our stock is likely
to be highly volatile because there has been a relatively thin trading market for our stock, which causes trades of small blocks
of stock to have a significant impact on our stock price. You may not be able to re-buy or re-sell our common stock easily following
periods of volatility because of the market's reaction to volatility.
Other factors that could cause such volatility
may include, among other things:
| · | announcements
concerning our strategy; |
| · | general
market conditions. |
Because our common stock is considered
a "penny stock" any investment in our common stock is considered to be a high-risk investment and is subject to restrictions
on marketability.
Our common stock is currently quoted on
the OTC Bulletin Board and the OTCQB and is considered a "penny stock." The OTC Bulletin Board and the OTCQB is generally
regarded as a less efficient trading market than the NASDAQ Capital Market.
The SEC has adopted rules that regulate
broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in "penny stocks." Penny stocks generally are equity securities
with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ
system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the
exchange or system). The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt
from those rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, which specifies information about penny
stocks and the nature and significance of risks of the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with
bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and any salesperson in the transaction, and
monthly account statements indicating the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. In addition, the penny
stock rules require that, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the broker-dealer must
make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's
written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the
secondary market for our common stock.
Since our common stock is subject to the
regulations applicable to penny stocks, the market liquidity for our common stock could be adversely affected because the regulations
on penny stocks could limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our common stock and thus your ability to sell our common stock
in the secondary market.
The Company may issue more shares which
will result in substantial dilution.
Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes
the issuance of a maximum of 300,000,000 shares of common stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our Board of Directors
has the power to issue any or all of such authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval. To the extent that additional
shares of common stock or preferred stock are issued, dilution to the interests of our stockholders will occur and the rights
of the holders of common stock might be materially and adversely affected.
FINRA sales practice requirements may
also limit a stockholder's ability to buy and sell our stock.
In addition to the “penny stock”
rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has adopted rules that require that in recommending
an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that
customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make
reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer's financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information.
Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will
not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that
their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the
market for our shares.
Our internal controls may be inadequate,
which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public.
Our management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial
officer and effected by the Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that
in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management
and directors, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use
or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
We have never paid dividends on our
common stock.
We have never paid dividends on our common
stock and do not presently intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that any funds available for payment
of dividends will be re-invested into the Company to further its business strategy.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
We lease two offices in Irvine, California.
The first lease, for the premises located at 23 Mauchly, Suite 106, Irvine will expire in July 2015. We pay rent monthly at the
rate of $1,710. We do not intend to renew this lease. We entered into a new lease on January 7, 2014 for the premises located
at 16795 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 240, Irvine, California, 92606, our headquarters. The lease has a 39 month term and calls for
monthly rent of $11,050, including common area charges. The premises are suitable for our current operations.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In July 2013, the Company became aware
that a default judgment had been entered against Mimvi (now Adaptive Medias, Inc.) in favor of Mario Armando Wilson and against
the Company in the amount of $62,141 and the balance has been accruing interest. In 2014, the Company and Mr. Wilson reached a
settlement agreement in which the Company granted Mr. Wilson 19,629 unregistered shares of stock and a commitment that the shares
will be tradeable on June 3, 2015 at a value of $74,000 with any shortfall being paid in cash.
The Company was in an arbitration case
entitled Felix Chan v. Mimvi (now Adaptive Medias, Inc.) which was proceeding before the American Arbitration Association.
On December 12, 2014, the Arbitrator issued an award against the Company in the amount of $348,803 which has been accrued as of
December 31, 2014. The Company is exploring options to have the award set-aside or reduced.
On September 20, 2013, Eric Rice, a former
employee, sued the Company (Rice v. Adaptive Medias, etc., et al., LASC No. LC100816, Van Nuys Superior Court). The complaint
alleges that the Company breached Mr. Rice's employment agreement and made misrepresentations when the Company terminated Mr.
Rice. The complaint does not specify the amount of alleged damages. The Company denies any breach or misrepresentation, and the
Company denies that it owes Mr. Rice anything. The Company has filed a cross-complaint against Mr. Rice for damages and other
relief. Discovery is underway.
On July 29, 2013, Khoi Senderowicz filed
a lawsuit against the Company and two other individuals, Andrew Linton and Kasian Franks (Senderowicz v. Franks, etc., et al.,
Case No. RG13689457, Alameda County Superior Court). The suit alleges breach of leases for real property and damages to real property
and seeks $353,894 in alleged damages. The Company has responded to the Complaint and denied all claims and damages.
In April of 2014,
the Company became aware that a lawsuit was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, California
by Amanda Besemer, who was an Advisory Board member of Mimvi from 2010-2012. Ms. Besemer seeks damages equivalent to $400,000
of stock or the cash equivalent of such related to the termination of the Advisory Board role. The Company has responded to the
Complaint and denied the allegations. The Company has been informed that the case in Santa Clara has been dismissed and that Ms.
Besemer intends to refile the case in Southern California. As yet, the case has not been refiled.
On January 27,
2015, the Company has become aware of a recent cross-complaint filed by the former CEO of OneScreen. (Patel v. OneScreen, Adaptive
Media, Inc and Qayed Shareef). The Company believes it has sufficient defenses against any of the claims in this matter and
intends to vigorously defend its position.
The Company does
not believe the ultimate outcome of these proceedings will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information: Our common
stock is quoted under the symbol "ADTM" on the OTC Bulletin Board and the OTCQB, a quotation service that displays sale
prices, and volume information for transactions with market makers in over-the-counter ("OTC") equity securities. All
such quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commissions and may not necessarily represent
actual transactions. Trading in our common stock is limited and sporadic and there can be no assurance that any liquid trading
market will develop or, if it does develop, that it can be maintained.
The high and low bid quotations for our
common stock for each of the quarters of our fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are set forth in the table below:
| |
Price Range | |
| |
High($) | | |
Low($) | |
| |
| | |
| |
Quarter ended March 31, 2013 | |
$ | 13.20 | | |
$ | 4.20 | |
Quarter ended June 30, 2013 | |
$ | 7.20 | | |
$ | 2.10 | |
Quarter ended September 30, 2013 | |
$ | 4.80 | | |
$ | 1.50 | |
Quarter ended December 31, 2013 | |
$ | 3.60 | | |
$ | 2.10 | |
Quarter ended March 31, 2014 | |
$ | 4.50 | | |
$ | 2.10 | |
Quarter ended June 30, 2014 | |
$ | 4.20 | | |
$ | 2.40 | |
Quarter ended September 30, 2014 | |
$ | 4.30 | | |
$ | 1.70 | |
Quarter ended December 31, 2014 | |
$ | 5.45 | | |
$ | 2.31 | |
Holders: According to the
records of Adaptive Medias’ transfer agent, Adaptive Medias had 351 stockholders of record as of March 26, 2015 and it believes
there are a substantially greater number of beneficial holders. This number does not include an indeterminate number of shareholders
whose shares are held by brokers in street name.
Dividends: We have not paid
any dividends to date, and we have no intention of paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The
declaration and payment of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and to certain limitations imposed
under the Nevada Revised Statutes. The timing, amount and form of dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, our results
of operation, financial condition, cash requirements and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.
Equity Compensation
Plan Information
The Company’s shareholders approved
the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) on November 2, 2010. The Plan provides for the grant
of non-statutory or incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and other stock-based
awards to the Company’s employees, Officers, Directors or consultants. The Company’s Board of Directors administers
the 2010 Plan, selects the individuals to whom options will be granted, determines the number of options to be granted, and the
term and exercise price of each option. Stock options granted pursuant to the terms of the 2010 Plan generally cannot be granted
with an exercise price of less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of the grant. The term of the options granted under
the 2010 Plan cannot be greater than 10 years. Options vest at varying rates generally over three to five years along with performance
based options.
In September 2013, our Board of Directors
approved an increase in the number of shares issuable pursuant to the 2010 Plan to 15,000,000. In December 2013, our Board of
Directors approved an amendment to the 2010 Plan which increased the number of shares issuable pursuant to the 2010 Plan by 15,000,000
to 30,000,000 shares. Both amendments have also been approved by the Company’s shareholders. Upon completion of the Reverse
Stock Split on April 14, 2014, the Company continues to have 30,000,000 shares issuable pursuant to the 2010 Plan.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding
the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2014.
| |
Number of securities to be Issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants And rights | | |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding
options, warrants and rights | | |
Number of securities remaining available for
future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column(a)) | |
| |
(a) | | |
(b) | | |
(c) | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | |
| 1,477,977 | (1) | |
$ | 1.11 | | |
| 28,522,023 | |
Total | |
| 1,477,977 | | |
$ | 1.11 | | |
| 28,522,023 | |
(1) Consists of our Amended and Restated
2010 Stock Incentive Plan, the material terms of which are described in Note 7 of the Notes to Financial Statements in Part II,
Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Plan provides for the grant of non-statutory or incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, and other stock-based awards to the Company’s employees, officers, directors or
consultants. The Board of Directors administers the Plan, selects the individuals to whom awards will be granted, determines the
number of awards to be granted, and the term and exercise price of each award. Stock options granted pursuant to the terms of
the Plan are generally granted with an exercise price of 100% of the fair market value on the date of the grant (110% for awards
issued to a 10% or more stockholder). The term of the options granted under the Plan cannot be greater than 10 years; 5 years
for a 10% or more stockholder. Options vest at varying rates. An aggregate of 30,000,000 shares are reserved under the Plan, of
which 28,522,023 shares were available for future grant at December 31, 2014.
Performance Graph
We are a smaller reporting company as
defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.
Issuances of Unregistered Securities
During the year ended December 31, 2014
the Company issued 555,309 shares of its common stock to several consultants in exchange for services rendered with an aggregate
fair value of $2,145,026 or $3.86 per share on average. Additionally, the Company issued and sold 3,239,780 shares of its common
stock to several accredited investors for an aggregate purchase price of $7,289,500 or $2.25 per share on average. In the same
period the Company issued 46,667 shares of common stock to the holder of a convertible promissory note at $2.25 per share upon
the conversion of the promissory note with a fair market value of $105,000. During the period the Company issued 64,993 shares
of its common stock for settlement of $195,879 of accounts payable. Finally the Company issued 5,000,000 of its common stock in
connection with merger transactions with a fair value of $15,000,000 or $3.00 per share on average.
During the twelve months ended December
31, 2014, most of the stock purchase agreements wherein the Company sold and issued common shares to accredited investors provided
for warrants to purchase common stock of the Company with strike prices that range from $2.25 to $15.00, at 100% warrant coverage.
All of the foregoing securities transactions were made in reliance upon an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act, and Regulation D promulgated thereunder in that the transactions involved private offerings of our unregistered
securities, we did not make a public offering or sale of our securities, the investors were either accredited or unaccredited
but sophisticated, and the investors represented to us that they were acquiring the securities for investment purposes and for
their own accounts, and not with an eye toward further distribution.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
As a "smaller reporting company" as defined by Item
10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide information required by this Item.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements that involve
risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can
identify forward-looking statements by terminology including, "could" "may", "will", "should",
"expect", "plan", "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "predict",
"potential" and the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions.
Actual events or results may differ materially.
While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions
upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual
results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future
performance suggested in this Annual Report.
Factors Affecting Our Performance
We believe that the growth of our business and our future success
depend on various opportunities, challenges and other factors, including the following:
Investment in Growth
During 2014, Adaptive Medias focused on
stabilizing and integrating the technology platform consisting of multiple legacy systems. With the acquisitions of Adaptive Media
and Ember and the business combination with Media Graph Inc., we needed to take a moment to insure all of our technology stack
properly works and is capable of handling the growth we are starting to experience. With the stabilization behind us, we plan
to invest in additional business development resources to drive awareness and adoption of the platform to targeted customers.
We also plan to invest in additional features and technology such as data visualization and insights and optimization tools that
will further increase the value of the platform to current and future customers. We also intend to continue investing in research
and development related to further streamlining the content marketplace service. The goal of these development efforts will be
to maximize market penetration across our multiple streams of income within the video and mobile landscapes while improving the
user experience. We also believe that as both our publisher and demand side sales teams becomes more seasoned, we will experience
an increase in sales productivity.
Technology Enhancements and Customer
Satisfaction
We will continue to make improvements
to our technology platform. We will be focusing our development efforts in two main categories. The first effort will be to increase
performance for our publishing partners through improved efficiency, higher fill rates and reduced Cost Per Thousand (“CPM”)
impressions. The second effort will be a collaborative solution with the agencies and advertisers that could include planning,
content monetization and strategic partnership opportunities. Both of these efforts will have the overarching goal of increasing
our customer satisfaction and thus increasing our customer retention.
Ability to Increase Penetration
in All Channels and All Devices
Our future performance is dependent on
our continued ability to penetrate and grow our revenue in mobile and video channels but to also serve the needs of our customers
that need help with display advertising. These revenues will come from both the publisher side through our RTB platform driving
inventory monetization and through direct agency and advertiser contracts. Video and mobile represent the fastest growing channels
currently, but we also see a significant opportunity in rich media and high impact display ads. Mobile device growth is eclipsing
desktop growth. We are seeing an increase in requests for cross device targeting. We are working on a unique, non-Personal Identity
Identifier (“PII”) solution based on our data store that will allow us to successfully identify users regardless of
which device they are on.
Seasonality
In the advertising industry, companies
commonly experience seasonal fluctuations in revenue. For example, many advertisers allocate the largest portion of their budgets
to the fourth quarter of the calendar year to coincide with increased holiday purchasing. Historically, the fourth quarter of
the year reflects our highest level of advertising activity, and the first quarter reflects the lowest level of such activity.
We expect our revenue to continue to fluctuate based on seasonal factors that affect the advertising industry as a whole.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar
Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (Topic 740). ASU 2013-11 requires that unrecognized tax benefits be presented in
the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or
a tax credit carryforward, except in certain circumstances. When those circumstances exist, the unrecognized tax benefit should
be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The Company adopted
this guidance effective January 1, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB and the International
Accounting Standards Board jointly issued ASU No. 2014-9, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which clarifies the principles
for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards.
The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services
to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods
and services. This ASU is effective for public entities for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early
adoption is not permitted under U.S. GAAP and retrospective application is permitted, but not required. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No.
2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statement-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability
to Continue as a Going Concern, which provides guidance under U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether
there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures.
In doing so, the amendments should reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. This ASU is effective for
all entities and for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2014-15 is not expected to have a significant impact on
the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in our consolidated
financial statements and related notes. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial
statements included with this report. We have identified below our critical accounting policies and estimates that we believe
require the greatest amount of judgment. These estimates and judgments have a significant impact on our consolidated financial
statements. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant
estimates and judgments and that we believe are the most critical to fully understand and evaluate our reported financial results
include the following:
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when earned
and related costs of sales and expenses when incurred. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605-10-S99,
Revenue Recognition, Overall, SEC Materials ("Section 605-10-S99"). Section 605-10-S99 requires that four basic criteria
must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services
rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Cost of revenue consists of the
cost of the purchased goods and labor related to the corresponding sales transaction. When a right of return exists, the Company
defers revenues until the right of return expires. The Company recognizes revenue from services at the time the services are completed.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The Company’s
accounts receivable primarily consist of trade receivables. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts that is based
on historical trends, customer knowledge, any known disputes, and the aging of the accounts receivable balances combined with
management’s estimate of future potential recoverability. Receivables are written off against the allowance after all attempts
to collect a receivable have failed. The Company believes its allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2014 and 2013
is adequate, but actual write-offs could exceed the recorded allowance.
Equity Instruments Issued to Non-Employees
for Acquiring Goods or Services
Issuances of the Company’s
common stock or warrants for acquiring goods or services are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair
value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date for the fair value of the
equity instruments issued to consultants or vendors is determined at the earlier of: (i) the date at which a commitment for performance
to earn the equity instruments is reached (a “performance commitment” which would include a penalty considered to
be of a magnitude that is a sufficiently large disincentive for nonperformance) or (ii) the date at which performance is complete.
When it is appropriate for the Company to recognize the cost of a transaction during financial reporting periods prior to the
measurement date, for purposes of recognition of costs during those periods, the equity instrument is measured at the then-current
fair values at each of those interim financial reporting dates
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are stated at cost. Expenditures
of costs incurred to renew or extend the term of a recognized intangible asset and materially extend the useful life are capitalized.
When assets are sold or otherwise written off due to asset impairment, the cost and the related accumulated amortization are removed
from the accounts and any realized gain or loss is recognized at that time. Useful lives of intangible assets are periodically
evaluated for reasonableness and the assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount may no longer be recoverable.
Amortization is computed primarily on
the straight-line method for financial statement purposes over the estimated useful lives of the related intangible assets. Estimated
useful lives will vary based on the nature of the intangible asset.
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350-30-65,
the Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Intangible assets were comprised of websites, customer lists, developed technology and
trade names. Factors the Company considers to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:
|
1) |
Significant underperformance
relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; |
|
2) |
Significant changes in
the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and |
|
3) |
Significant negative industry
or economic trends. |
When the Company determines that the carrying
value of intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment and
the carrying value of the asset cannot be recovered from projected undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment
charge. The Company measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined
by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Significant management judgment is required
in determining whether an indicator of impairment exists and in projecting cash flows.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation is accounted
for based on the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 718 which requires recognition in the consolidated financial statements of the
cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or
director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). FASB ASC Topic 718
also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date
fair value of the award.
Pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 505-50, for
share-based payments to consultants and other third parties, compensation expense is determined at the “measurement date.”
The expense is recognized over the vesting period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation
expense remains uncertain. The Company initially records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting
date.
Year Ended December 31, 2014 compared
with Year Ended December 31, 2013
Revenue
For the year ended December 31, 2014,
revenue was $5,075,226 compared to $1,030,267 for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $4,044,959 or 393%. This increase
was due to the successful growth of the Company’s advertising business along with acquisitions we consummated in 2014 and
2013. We believe the Company’s revenue growth will continue to accelerate in 2015.
Operating Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2 014,
our operating expenses increased to $19,941,879 from $8,278,881 for the year ended December 31 2013, an increase of $11,662,998
or 141%.
For the year ended December 31, 2014,
the overall increase in the operating expenses was substantially due to the increase in general and administrative expenses, legal
and professional fees, research and development, selling expenses, and impairment of intangibles, offset by a decrease in stock
compensation expense. In 2014, general and administrative expenses increased to $4,044,468 from $2,197,784 for the year ended
December 31, 2013, an increase of $1,846,684 or 84%, primarily due to the expansion in the number of employees and consultants
required to operate a growing business as the Company matured into a revenue-stage company from a development-stage one. We expect
general and administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars in future periods.
Legal and professional fees in 2014 rose
to $1,506,016 from $1,121,661 in 2013, an increase of $384,355 or 34%, due to a significant acquisition, numerous financing activities,
expenses related to legacy obligations of the Company, and expenses related to public-company compliance. Impairment of intangibles
increased in 2014 to $8,604,315 from $342,610 in the previous year, an increase of $8,261,705 or 2411% due to the write-off of
certain intangibles associated with the Media Graph and the Adaptive Media transactions.
Selling expenses in 2014 increase to $1,712,328
from $0, an increase of $1,712,328 or 100%, due to a significant effort in securing additional revenue. We expect sales and marketing
expenses to increase in absolute dollars in future periods, but at a slower growth rate.
Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased to $1,485,384 from $206,416, and increase of $1,278,968 or 620%, due to the acquisition of several fixed assets and
intangibles in connection with the Media Graph transaction, along with the acquisitions consummated in 2013. We expect depreciation
and amortization to increase in absolute dollars in future periods.
In addition, a portion of the general
and administrative expenses and legal and professional fees incurred in 2014 and 2013 were paid in the form of our restricted
common stock and are reflected in the consolidated financial statements under stock compensation expense. In the event that
individuals or consultants who provided services on behalf of the Company were compensated in stock, all of the common shares
issued were priced at fair value based on the closing price of our stock on the date of issuance. All of the options issued were
priced using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Stock based compensation expense decreased in 2014 to $1,206,852 from $4,154,665
in 2013, a decrease of $2,947,813 or 71%. The decrease in 2014 was a result of a decrease in the use of stock and stock options
as compensation from the prior year, as well as the granting of stock and options to a reduced pool of employees and consultants.
Research and development expenses consist
of software engineering costs for employees and consultants that are developing specific Adaptive Medias products. For the year
ended December 31, 2014, the research and development expenses increased to $1,381,873 from $255,745 for the year ended December
31, 2013, an increase of $1,126,128 or 440%. This increase is due primarily to a shift of the business model resulting from the
acquisition of Media Graph, Inc. in July 2014. We expect research and development expenses to increase in absolute dollars in
future periods.
For the year ended December 31, 2014,
the Company had a loss on extinguishment of debt of $19,379 compared to a gain of $15,988 for the year ended December 31, 2013,
an increase in losses of $35,367 primarily due to unfavorable settlements of certain debt obligations of the Company.
For the year ended December 31, 2014,
the interest expense decreased to $42,171 compared to $486,396 for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $444,225 or
91%. In 2013, we recorded amortization of debt discount related to the agreement with Gemini Master Fund.
Net Loss
For the year ended December 31, 2014,
we incurred a loss of $18,849,726 or $2.04 per share - basic and diluted, compared to a net loss of $8,462,981, or $2.52 per share
- basic and diluted for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $10,386,745 or 123%. See above for the detailed explanations
of the each category of expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2014, we had $2,255,784
cash available and $4,072,155 of total current assets consisting of prepaid expenses of $61,478 and accounts receivable of $1,754,893.
We had total current liabilities of $ 4,649,595 consisting of accounts payable and accrued expenses.
We currently have limited funds to pay
our accounts payable and accrued expenses. Should one or more of our creditors seek or demand immediate payment in-full, we are
not likely to have the resources to pay or satisfy any such claims. Thus, we face the risk of defaulting on our obligations to
our creditors with the consequential legal and other costs that would adversely impact our ability to continue our existence.
Our insolvent financial condition also
may create a risk that we may be forced to file for protection under applicable bankruptcy laws or state insolvency statutes.
We also may face the risk that a receiver may be appointed. We face that risk and other risks resulting from our current financial
condition.
During the year ended December 31, 2014,
we raised $7,289,500 in equity financing, however, this does not alleviate our current financial position, nor does it enable
us to sustain our current operations. For these and other reasons, we anticipate that unless we can obtain sufficient capital
from an outside source and do so in the very near future, we may be unable to continue to operate, continue to meet our filing
obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise satisfy our obligations to our employees, consultants, and
others.
For these and other reasons, our management
recognizes the adverse difficulties and continuing severe challenges we face. We have no committed sources of financing. Apart
from the limited funds that we have received from selling our securities there can be no assurance that we will receive any financing
or funding from any source or if any financing should be obtained, that existing shareholders will not incur substantial, immediate,
and permanent dilution of their existing investment.
The following is a summary of the Company's
cash flows provided by or used in operating, investing, and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
For the Year Ended |
| |
December 31, 2014 | | |
December 31, 2013 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Net cash used in operating activities | |
$ | (4,471,775 | ) | |
$ | (2,827,966 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net cash used in investing activities | |
$ | (300,504 | ) | |
$ | (2,491 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | |
$ | 7,005,875 | | |
$ | 2,789,359 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash | |
$ | 2,233,596 | | |
$ | (41,098 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash - beginning of year | |
$ | 22,188 | | |
$ | 63,286 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash - end of year | |
$ | 2,255,784 | | |
$ | 22,188 | |
Going Concern Uncertainties
The Company has a history of operating losses and has incurred
significant net losses in each fiscal year since its inception. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had net revenues
of $5,075,226 and $1,030,267 and incurred net losses of $18,849,726 and $8,462,981, respectively. We will need to generate significant
additional revenue and/or cost reductions to achieve profitability. While management believes that we may achieve profitability
in the future, there can be no assurance that we will do so. Our ability to generate and sustain significant additional revenues
or achieve profitability will depend upon numerous factors outside of our control, including sales of our advertising and software
products and reduction of our debt obligations.
It may be necessary for us to secure additional
working capital through loans or sales of common stock, and there can be no assurance that such funding will be available in the
future. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our independent registered
public accounting firm has issued a "going concern" qualification as part of their report on our consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2014, which is contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Capital Expenditures
We have not incurred any material capital
expenditures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any off-balance
sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in
financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that would
be considered material to investors.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk.
Not Applicable
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
See pages beginning with page F-1.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under
the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and includes those policies and procedures that:
· |
Pertain to the maintenance
of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; |
· |
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our
management and Directors; and |
· |
Provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect
on the consolidated financial statements. |
We believe that our processes and controls
provide reasonable assurance for the consolidated financial statement preparation and presentation. However, because of inherent
limitations in the size of the Company’s organization, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements.
Our management assessed the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, management used the criteria
set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated
Framework. Based on such assessment, our President (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
and accounting officer) determined that, as of December 31, 2014, our internal control over financial reporting is not effective.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures.
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)
that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and
forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
We carried out an evaluation under the
supervision and with the participation of management, including our President and Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2014, the
end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Based on that evaluation, our
President and Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
not effective during the 2014 fiscal year at a reasonable assurance level, as a result of material weaknesses primarily related
to a lack of a sufficient number of personnel with appropriate training and experience in GAAP and a proper segregation of duties
based on our size and available resources. These material weaknesses are due to an insufficient numbers of properly trained and
experienced personnel available to independently test the design of our key controls at the financial activity level as well as
the insufficient operations of information technology general controls in identifying a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies,
which may result in a reasonable possibility that a more than an inconsequential misstatement of the consolidated financial statements
would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. While Management has reviewed the consolidated financial statements and
underlying information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in detail and believes the procedures performed are adequate
to fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in all material respects,
the deficiency in accounting personnel that existed in fiscal year 2014 could have led to an error in the original accounting
of the estimated fair market value of certain security instruments.
Remediation of Material Weaknesses.
A material weakness is a control deficiency
(within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard No. 5), or combination
of control deficiencies, that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected. While management believes that the Company’s consolidated financial statements
previously filed in the Company’s SEC reports have been properly recorded and disclosed in accordance with GAAP, we have
designed and plan to implement, or in some cases have already implemented, the specific remediation initiatives described below:
· |
We plan to retain additional
accounting personnel and continue to enhance our internal finance and accounting organizational structure. |
|
|
· |
We have hired a third party consultant
who has the required background and experience in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
and with SEC rules and regulations. |
|
|
· |
We are in the process of further enhancing
the supervisory procedures to include additional levels of analysis and quality control reviews within the accounting and
financial reporting functions. |
|
|
· |
We are in the process of strengthening
our internal policies and enhancing our processes for ensuring consistent treatment and recording of reserve estimates, performing
impairment analyses, and that validation of our conclusions regarding significant accounting policies and their application
to our business transactions are carried out by personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and
training. |
While we now believe that these material
weaknesses are currently being addressed, we will continue our remediation efforts during fiscal year 2015.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
No changes in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting have come to management's attention during the Company's last fiscal quarter that have materially affected,
or are likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information as to the directors and executive officers of the
Company is as follows:
Name |
|
Position |
|
Director
Since |
|
Jim Waltz (1) |
|
Acting Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
Omar Akram (2) |
|
SVP, Product & Technology, President, Chief Financial
Officer and Director |
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
Bryan Nguyen (3) |
|
Chief Technology Officer |
|
July 1, 2014 |
|
Bruce Wiseman (4) |
|
Director |
|
May 7, 2014 |
|
Mark Lambert (5) |
|
Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee |
|
September 1, 2014 |
|
Background of Directors and Executive
Officers
(1)
Jim Waltz, 45, was appointed Acting Chief Operating Officer in January 2015. Since August 2010,
Mr. Waltz has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Beanstock Media, a leading advertising-technology company, where he heads
business strategy and execution using his hands-on knowledge of the inner workings of the technology and his strategic vision
of the ad serving and ad network worlds to connect consumers with rich, engaging and relevant interactive ad content. Prior to
joining Beanstock Media, Mr. Waltz held senior positions, including President, Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of Sales,
at Traffic MarketPlace, AdModus and DoubleClick, respectively.
(2) Omar Akram, 44, Vice President of
Product & Technology was appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors as of December 31, 2013 and on March 11, 2015
was appointed the position of President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Akram attended California State University, Long Beach
and has fifteen years of experience in the technology industry. Mr. Akram has expertise in multiple life-cycle methodologies from
conception to completion and a strong background in ad platforms, operations, targeting technology, product implementation, e-commerce,
and overall site monetization strategy. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Akram served as a Director of Product Development at
Tactara from March 2012 until January 2013, where he primarily built out the Display RTB platform; Senior Product Development
Manager at SpinMedia from December 2011 until April 2012, where he managed an Ad Production team consisting of developers and
designers; and Senior Product/Project Development Manager at Epic Marketplace from April 2009 until November 2011, where he was
responsible for successfully migrating the core Ad-Serving platform to a white labeled solution, deploying a data warehousing/
BI solution, and migrating the company’s Ad-Serving platform to a cloud vendor Because of his long experience in the technology
industry during which time he assisted with the development of technology products for the market we serve, we determined that
Mr. Akram should be appointed to the Board of Directors.
(3) Bryan Nguyen, 39, Chief Technology
Officer, has nearly two decades of experience in computer science and has worked in many high-tech industries, including e-commerce,
online banking, IT, online advertising and big data. Prior to joining the Company in February 2014, Mr. Nguyen served as Ad Server
Architect at MyBuys from July 2011 until February 2014, Director of Technology at Traffic Marketplace from July 2009 until July
2011, and Senior Software Engineer/Java Architect at Connexus March 2007 until June 2009. Nguyen graduated from UC Berkeley with
a degree in Computer Science.
(4)Bruce Wiseman, 50, Director, has over
25 years of experience in operational and financial roles at companies including: Disney, Yahoo Search Marketing, Veoh, Fox Audience
Network, Rubicon, Adconion Media Group and Price Waterhouse. Since August 2013, he has run his own consulting business, Wiseman
& Associates, helping businesses that are going through significant growth and change make good operational and financial
decisions and build frameworks for aligning strategic, operational and financial goals. Mr. Wiseman served as Chief Operating
Officer (Global) at Adconion Media Group from February 2012 until August 2013, Chief Operating Officer (North America) at Adconion
Media Group from March 2011 until February 2012, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
at Fox Audience Network from October 2009 until March 2011. Because of his extensive experience in strategic, operational and
financial leadership, we determined that Mr. Wiseman should be appointed to the Board of Directors.
(5) Mark
Lambert, 50, Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee is currently Chief Financial Officer
of ClearSlide, which is a cloud-based SaaS platform for streamlining and improving the communications and document sharing process
used by sales teams and businesses. Mr. Lambert has over 20 years of financial experience at companies including GAP, 3Com, Yahoo,
Tell-me, Connexus and Blurb. Prior to joining ClearSlide in June 2012, Mr. Lambert served as Chief Financial Officer at Blurb
from March 2010 until June 2012, and Chief Financial Officer at Connexus Corporation from 2007 until 2012. Because of his valuable
experience software publishing and his financial expertise, we determined that Mr. Lambert should be appointed to the Board of
Directors.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships between any director or executive
officer.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
None.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of The
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Except as set forth below, we believe
that, during fiscal 2014, our Directors, executive officers and 10% stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.
In making this statement, we have relied upon examination of the copies of Forms 3, 4 and 5, and amendments thereto, provided
to Adaptive Medias, Inc. and the written representations of its directors and executive officers.
James Batmasian, a beneficial owner of
greater than 10% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock, failed to timely file one Form 3 and one Schedule 13D reporting
his acquisition of 1,777,778 shares of common stock. Mr. Batmasian filed such Form 3 and Schedule 13D on October 23, 2014.
Audit Committee and Audit Committee
Financial Expert
The Company is not a "listed company"
under SEC rules and is therefore not required to have an audit committee comprised of independent directors. The Company has an
audit committee that performs these main functions: (1) selection and oversight of the Company's independent accountant; (2) establishment
of procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters;
and (3) engagement of outside advisors. The Company's Board of Directors has determined that at least one member of the Audit
Committee, Mr. Mark Lambert is an "audit committee financial expert" within the meaning of the rules and regulations
of the SEC. The Board of Directors believes that Mr. Mark Lambert has sufficient knowledge and experience necessary to fulfill
the duties and obligations of the audit committee and is independent.
Stockholder Nominations
We do not now have, nor have we had in
the past, procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.
Code of Ethics
A code of ethics relates to written standards
that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:
| · | Honest
and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of
interest between personal and professional relationships; |
| · | Full,
fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that are
filed with, or submitted to, the SEC and in other public communications made by an issuer; |
| · | Compliance
with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; |
| · | The
prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons
identified in the code; and |
| · | Accountability
for adherence to the code. |
The Company has not adopted a corporate
code of ethics that applies to its executive officers, however it intends to do so in 2015.
Conflicts of Interest
Certain conflicts of interest may exist
between the Company and its management, and conflicts may develop in the future. The Company has not established policies or procedures
for the resolution of current or potential conflicts of interest between the Company, its officers and directors or affiliated
entities. There can be no assurance that management will resolve all conflicts of interest in favor of the Company, and conflicts
of interest may arise that can be resolved only through the exercise by management their best judgment as may be consistent with
their fiduciary duties. Management will try to resolve conflicts to the best advantage of all concerned.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth summary
information concerning compensation paid or accrued for services rendered to the Company in all capacities for the fiscal years
2014 and 2013 to (i) the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and (ii) the Company’s other executives who were serving
as executive officers at the end of fiscal year 2014.
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
Stock | | |
Option | | |
All Other | | |
| |
Name and Principal | |
| |
Salary | | |
Bonus | | |
Awards | | |
Awards | | |
Compensation | | |
Total | |
Position | |
Year | |
($) | | |
($) | | |
($)(5) | | |
($)(5) | | |
($) | | |
($) | |
Qayed Shareef (1) | |
2014 | |
$ | 153,333 | | |
$ | 116,326 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 269,659 | |
Chief Executive Officer | |
2013 | |
$ | 47,030 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 47,030 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Omar Akram (2) | |
2014 | |
$ | 122,917 | | |
$ | 5,000 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 17,620 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 145,537 | |
VP, Product & Technology | |
2013 | |
$ | 47,750 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 9,735 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 57,485 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Abdul Parmach (3) | |
2014 | |
$ | 80,000 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | | | |
$ | 13,788 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 93,788 | |
Principal Accounting Officer | |
2013 | |
$ | 34,375 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 7,704 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 42,079 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Bryan Nguyen (4) | |
2014 | |
$ | 166,625 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 30,000 | | |
$ | 18,315 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 214,940 | |
Chief Technology Officer | |
2013 | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 1,431 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 1,431 | |
(1) Mr. Shareef became Chief Executive
Officer in July 2013. His employment agreement called for a base salary of $10,000 per month for the period of January 1 through
August 31, 2014. Starting on September 1, 2014 his base salary was increased to $18,333 per month. On January 21, 2014, the Company’s
Board of Directors, voting without Mr. Shareef, determined to amend (the “Amendment”) Mr. Shareef’s Executive
Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”) in order to award him a bonus of $16,667 per
month, payable on the first day of each month, from February through July 2014. On July 11, 2014, the Company’s Board of
Directors, determined Mr. Shareef eligible for an ongoing annual bonus of $30,000 based on achieving the second half of the year
revenue goal, as set forth by the Board. In connection with this disposition, Mr. Shareef was awarded $16,325. Effective as of
January 26, 2015, Qayed Shareef was terminated by the Board of Directors from his positions as Chief Executive Officer and Director
of Adaptive Medias, Inc
(2) Mr. Akram’s compensation is
$12,500 per month. His employment agreement called for a base salary of $8,333 per month for the period of January 1 through July
15, 2014. Starting on July 16, 2014 his base salary was increased to $12,500 per month.
On July 26, 2013, he was granted the option
to purchase 16,667 shares with an exercise price of $2.70 per share.
(3) Mr. Parmach’s compensation is
$7,083 per month. He was appointed as the Company’s Principal Accounting Officer on August 16, 2013. His employment agreement
called for a base salary of $6,250 per month for the period of January 1 through June 30, 2014. Starting on July 1, 2014 his base
salary was increased to $7,083 per month. On July 26, 2013, Mr. Parmach was granted the option to purchase 15,000 shares with
an exercise price of $2.70 per share. On July 1, 2014, Mr. Parmach was granted the option to purchase 1,667 shares with an exercise
price of $2.55 per share. Effective as of March 9, 2015, Abdul Parmach resigned as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company
(4)
Bryan Nguyen became Chief Technology Officer in July 2014. His employment agreement called for a base salary of $15,500 per month.
On September 9, 2013 he was granted the option to purchase 3,333 shares with an exercise price of $3.00. On February 2, 2014 he
was granted the option to purchase 33,333 shares with an exercise price of $2.55. In March 2014, Mr. Nguyen transitioned from
the role of Chief Technology Officer to Senior Developer to focus on the data insight needs of the Company.
(5) These amounts reflect the value determined
by the Company for accounting purposes for these awards with respect to the current fiscal year and do not reflect whether the
recipient has actually realized a financial benefit from the awards (such as by exercising stock options). This column represents
the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options and warrants granted during fiscal year 2014 and 2013 to each of the named
executive officers, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude
the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The assumptions made when calculating the amounts
in this table are found in Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
The Company may change or increase salaries
as the Company's profits and cash flow allow. The amount of any increase in salaries and compensation for existing officers has
not been determined at this time and the number and dollar amount to be paid to additional management staff that will likely be
employed have not been determined.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year End
The following table shows all outstanding equity awards held
by our named executive officers at December 31, 2014.
| |
| | |
Number of securities | | |
| | |
|
| |
Number of securities | | |
underlying | | |
| | |
|
| |
underlying unexercised | | |
unexercised | | |
Option | | |
|
| |
options | | |
options | | |
exercise price | | |
|
Name | |
(#) exercisable | | |
(#) unexercisable | | |
($) | | |
Option expiration date |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Qayed Shareef | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
$ | - | | |
- |
Omar Akram | |
| 6,445 | (1) | |
| 10,222 | (1) | |
$ | 2.70 | | |
7/26/2023 |
Abdul Parmach | |
| 6,095 | (2) | |
| 8,905 | (2) | |
$ | 2.70 | | |
7/26/2023 |
Abdul Parmach | |
| 0 | (3) | |
| 1,667 | (3) | |
$ | 2.25 | | |
7/1/2024 |
Bryan Nguyen | |
| 2,085 | (4) | |
| 1,248 | (4) | |
$ | 3.00 | | |
9/9/2023 |
Bryan Nguyen | |
| 0 | (5) | |
| 33,333 | (5) | |
$ | 2.55 | | |
2/18/2024 |
(1) An option was
granted to Mr. Akram on July 26, 2013 for 16,667 shares at an exercise price of $2.70 per share. Twenty-five percent of the
options vest on the 1-year anniversary, and the remaining 75% vest monthly over 36 months, assuming continued employment with
Adaptive Medias. Upon a change of control of the Company, 100% of the unvested options become immediately exercisable. |
(2) An option was granted to
Mr. Parmach on July 26, 2013 for 15,000 shares at an exercise price of $2.70 per share. Twenty-five percent of the options
vest on the 1-year anniversary, and the remaining 75% vest monthly over 36 months, assuming continued employment with Adaptive
Medias. Upon a change of control of the Company, 100% of the unvested options become immediately exercisable. |
(3) An option was granted to
Mr. Parmach on July 1, 2014 for 1,667 shares at an exercise price of $2.25 per share. Twenty-five percent of the options vest
on the 1-year anniversary, and the remaining 75% vest monthly over 36 months, assuming continued employment with Adaptive
Medias. Upon a change of control of the Company, 100% of the unvested options become immediately exercisable. |
(4) An option was granted to
Mr. Nguyen on September 09, 2013 for 3,333 shares at an exercise price of $3.00 per share. The options vest equally over a
period of 24 months, assuming continued employment with Adaptive Medias. Upon a change of control of the Company, 100% of
the unvested options become immediately exercisable. |
(5) An option was granted to
Mr. Nguyen on February 18, 2014 for 33,333 shares at an exercise price of $2.55 per share. Twenty-five percent of the options
vest on the 1-year anniversary, and the remaining 75% vest monthly over 36 months, assuming continued employment with Adaptive
Medias. Upon a change of control of the Company, 100% of the unvested options become immediately exercisable. |
Director Compensation
The following table sets forth summary information concerning
compensation paid or accrued for services rendered to the Company in all capacities for 2014 fiscal year by the Company’s
directors.
| |
| |
Fees Earned or | | |
Stock | | |
Option | | |
All Other | | |
| |
| |
| |
Paid in Cash | | |
Awards | | |
Awards | | |
Compensation | | |
Total | |
Name | |
Year | |
($) | | |
($)(3) | | |
($)(3) | | |
($) | | |
($) | |
| |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Qayed Shareef | |
2014 | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Omar Akram | |
2014 | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
Vice President, Product & Technology and Director | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Bruce Wiseman (1) | |
2014 | |
$ | 60,000 | | |
$ | 42,616 | | |
$ | 5,911 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 108,527 | |
Director | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Mark Lambert (2) | |
2014 | |
$ | 3,333 | | |
$ | 23,648 | | |
$ | 5,911 | | |
$ | | | |
$ | 32,892 | |
Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
(1) Effective May 7, 2014, Bruce Wiseman
was appointed by the Company's Board of Directors as a member thereof. The monthly salary for the services rendered is $7,500.
On July 1, 2014 he was granted 33,334 shares of restricted stock. On September 1, 2014 he was granted an option to purchase 16,667
shares of common stock with an exercise price of $2.14 per share. The stock and the option vest in equal monthly increments over
a period of one year, assuming continued engagement as a Director with Adaptive Medias. Upon a change of control of the Company,
100% of the unvested options become immediately exercisable.
(2) Effective September 1, 2014, Mark
Lambert was appointed by the Company's Board of Directors as a member thereof and as Chairman of the Audit Committee. The quarterly
salary for the services rendered is $2,500. September 1, 2014 he was granted 33,334 shares of restricted stock .On September 1,
2014 he was granted the Option to purchase 16,667 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $2.14 per share. The stocks
and option vest in equal monthly increments over a period of one year, assuming continued engagement as a Director with Adaptive
Medias. Upon a change of control of the Company, 100% of the unvested stock and options become immediately exercisable.
(3) These amounts reflect the value determined by the Company
for accounting purposes for these awards with respect to the current fiscal year and do not reflect whether the recipient has
actually realized a financial benefit from the awards (such as by exercising stock options). This column represents the aggregate
grant date fair value of stock options and warrants granted during the 2014 fiscal year to each of the directors, in accordance
with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures
related to service-based vesting conditions. The assumptions made when calculating the amounts in this table are found in Note
7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth information
relating to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock by those persons beneficially holding more than 5% of
the Company's common stock, by the Company's directors and named executive officers, and by all of the Company's Directors and
executive officers as a group as of March 26, 2015.
Beneficial ownership and percentage ownership
are determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Under these rules, beneficial ownership generally includes any shares
as to which the individual or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power and includes any shares that an individual
or entity has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of on or before May 26, 2015, which is 60 days from March 26, 2015, through
the exercise of any option, warrant, conversion privilege or similar right. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned
by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of our common stock that could be issued upon the exercise of
outstanding options and warrants that are exercisable on or before May 26, 2015 are considered to be outstanding. These shares,
however, are not considered outstanding as of March 26, 2015 when computing the percentage ownership of each other person.
To our knowledge, except as indicated
in the footnotes to the following table and subject to state community property laws where applicable, all beneficial owners named
in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. Percentage
of ownership is based on our shares of common stock outstanding as of March 26, 2015.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | |
Amount and Nature Of Beneficial Ownership | | |
Percent of Class (1) | |
Holders of Greater Than 5%: | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Jim Batmasian Investments Limited | |
| 1,950,778 | | |
| 11 | % |
Onescreen Partners Inc. | |
| 1,228,500 | | |
| 7 | % |
Onescreen Partners B Inc. | |
| 1,217,500 | | |
| 7 | % |
Onescreen Inc. | |
| 1,000,000 | | |
| 6 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Directors and Named Executive Officers: | |
| | | |
| | |
Omar Akram, President, CFO, Vice President Product & Technology and Director (1) | |
| 66,001 | | |
| 0 | % |
Bruce Wiseman, Director (2) | |
| 135,503 | | |
| 1 | % |
Jim Waltz, Acting Chief Operating Officer | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | % |
Mark Lambert, Director (3) | |
| 50,001 | | |
| 0 | % |
Bryan H. Nguyen, Chief Technology Officer (4) | |
| 45,001 | | |
| 0 | % |
| |
| | | |
| | |
All Directors and Officers as a group (5 persons) | |
| 296,506 | | |
| 2 | % |
Omar Akram, President, CFO, Vice President Product & Technology
and Director (1): Mr. Akram’s beneficial ownership includes options to purchase 16,667 shares at an exercise price of $2.70
per share.
Bruce Wiseman, director (2): Mr. Wiseman’s beneficial
ownership includes options to purchase 16,667 shares at an exercise price of $2.14 per share and restricted stock grants for 25,000
shares.
Mark Lambert, Director (3): Mr. Lambert’s beneficial
ownership includes options to purchase 16,667 shares at an exercise price of $2.14 per share and restricted stock grants for 25,000
shares.
Bryan H. Nguyen, Chief Technology Officer (4): Mr. Nguyen's
beneficial ownership includes options to purchase 3,334 shares at an exercise price of $2.70 per share and option to purchase
33,334 shares at an exercise price of $2.55 per share.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
A description of the Company’s Amended
and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan is provided in Item 5 under the heading “Equity Compensation Plan Information”
and is incorporated herein by reference.
Changes in Control Arrangements
Upon a change of control, some employee
stock options may be subject to accelerated vesting.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Other than the employment compensation
described above in “Executive Compensation” and the transactions described below, since January 1, 2013 there has
not been, nor is there currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which the Company is or will be
a party in which the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of the Company’s total
assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years; and in which any related person of Adaptive Medias, Inc. had or will
have a direct or indirect material interest, as contemplated by Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act.
| · | On
April 1, 2014, the Company entered into an Independent Contractor Master Agreement with
Bruce Wiseman, director of the Company, pursuant to which Mr. Wiseman provides various
operational, analytical and decision-support consulting services to the Company at an
hourly rate of $300 per hour, 50% of which is payable monthly in cash and 50% of which
is payable quarterly in the form of restricted stock. During 2014, $250,721 in cash compensation
was earned by Mr. Wiseman pursuant to this agreement and 77,168 shares of common stock
were issued to Mr. Wiseman at a value on the grant date of $242,985. The agreement may
be terminated by either party upon 2 weeks’ notice. |
| · | On
October 1, 2014, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with Norman Brodeur,
a beneficial owner of greater than 10% of the Company’s outstanding stock, pursuant
to which Mr. Brodeur provides management and business consulting services, primarily
in connection with identifying and evaluating prospective strategic business opportunities
and alliances and managing prospective investor relations in exchange for a fee of $16,000
per month. The agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days’ notice. |
Director Independence
Our common stock is currently quoted on
the OTC Bulletin Board, or the OTCBB, and OTCQB. Since neither the OTCBB nor the OTCQB has its own rules for director independence,
we use the definition of independence established by the NYSE Amex (formerly the American Stock Exchange). Under applicable NYSE
Amex rules, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of our Board, that person
does not have a relationship which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities
of a director. We periodically review the independence of each director. Pursuant to this review, at this time one of our directors,
is independent.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The following table sets forth fees billed
to us by our independent auditors for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 for (i) services rendered for the audit of our
annual consolidated financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial statements, (ii) services rendered that are
reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements that are not reported as
Audit Fees, and (iii) services rendered in connection with tax preparation, compliance, advice and assistance.
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Audit fees | |
$ | 78,575 | | |
$ | 45,250 | |
Audit-related fees | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Tax fees | |
| 1,100 | | |
| - | |
All other fees | |
| 17,320 | | |
| - | |
Total fees | |
$ | 96,995 | | |
$ | 45,250 | |
Audit Fees: Represents fees
for professional services provided for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, services that are performed
to comply with generally accepted auditing standards, and review of our consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly
reports and services in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.
During the year ended December 31, 2014,
the Company was billed $78,575 in audit fees by Ramirez Jimenez International CPAs.
During the year ended December 31, 2013,
the Company was billed $6,000 in audit fees by Ramirez Jimenez International CPAs and $39,250 by GBH CPAs.
Audit-Related Fees: Represents the fees for assurance
and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements.
The Audit Committee of the Company and
approves all auditing services and the terms thereof and non-audit services (other than non-audit services published under Section
10A(g) of the Exchange Act or the applicable rules of the SEC or the Pubic Company Accounting Oversight Board) to be provided
to us by the independent auditor; provided, however, the pre-approval requirement is waived with respect to the provisions of
non-audit services for us if the "de minimus" provisions of Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act are satisfied.
Tax Fees : This represents professional services
rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
All Other Fees : Our auditor was paid $17,320 in
other fees for professional services during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Exhibit
Number |
|
Description |
3.1 |
|
Articles
of Incorporation filed with Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on August 7, 2007 (1) |
3.2 |
|
Bylaws
(1) |
|
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on March 4, 2010 (2) |
3.4 |
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on April 12, 2012 (3) |
5.1 |
|
2,000,000
shares of Common Stock registered pursuant to 2013 Consultant Stock Plan (4) |
10.1 |
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated December 28, 2012 (5) |
10.2 |
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement and Issuance of Convertible Notes issued May 21, 2013 (6) |
10.3 |
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger with Adaptive Medias, Inc., dated July 1, 2013 (7) |
10.4 |
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger with Adaptive Medias, Inc., dated December 4, 2013 (8) |
10.5 |
|
$100,000
Secured Promissory Note, dated January 21, 2014 (9) |
10.6 |
|
Stock
Pledge Agreement for 18,628,900 shares, dated January 21, 2014 (9) |
10.7 |
|
Stock
Purchase Agreement whereby Kasian Franks purchased 10,000,000 shares of the Company, dated January 8, 2010 (10) |
10.8 |
|
Stock
Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, OneScreen, Inc. and Media Graph, Inc., dated as of June 30, 2014 (11) |
99.1 |
|
2013
Consultant Stock Plan, dated October 5, 2013 (4) |
99.2 |
|
Amended
and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, dated October 5, 2012 (4) |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
Powers
of Attorney* |
31.1 |
|
Certification
of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 15d-15(e), under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934* |
31.2 |
|
Certification
of the Company’s Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 15d-15(e), under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934* |
32.1 |
|
Certification
of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document* |
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Schema* |
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Calculation Linkbase* |
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Definition Linkbase* |
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Label Linkbase* |
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension
Presentation Linkbase* |
*Filed herewith
(1) |
Filed with the SEC on October
3, 2008 as an exhibit to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1, which exhibit is incorporated herein by
reference. |
(2) |
Filed with the SEC on April 16, 2012 as
an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 10-K, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(3) |
Filed with the SEC on April 10, 2013 as
an exhibit to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(4) |
Filed with the SEC on February 25, 2013
as an exhibit to the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(5) |
Filed with the SEC on January 7, 2013 as
an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(6) |
Filed with the SEC on May 28, 2013 as an
exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(7) |
Filed with the SEC on July 2, 2013 as an
exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(8) |
Filed with the SEC on December 9, 2013
as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(9) |
Filed with the SEC on January 21, 2014
as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(10) |
Filed with the SEC on February 1, 2010
as an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference. |
(11) |
Filed with the SEC on July 17, 2014 as
an exhibit to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K, which is incorporated herein by reference. |
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. Financial Statements
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements at Item 8 herein.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.
|
|
ADAPTIVE
MEDIAS, INC. |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
March 26, 2015 |
By: |
/s/
Omar Akram |
|
|
Omar Akram
President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities
and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Omar Akram |
|
President,
Chief Financial Officer |
|
March
26, 2015 |
Omar
Akram |
|
and
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Bruce Wiseman* |
|
Director |
|
March
26, 2015 |
Bruce
Wiseman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Mark Lambert* |
|
Director |
|
March
26, 2015 |
Mark
Lambert |
|
|
|
|
* Omar Akram, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign
this report on behalf of the directors of the Registrant above whose typed names appear, pursuant to powers of the attorney executed
by such director and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
By: |
/s/ Omar Akram |
|
|
Omar Akram, Attorney-in-Fact |
|
INDEX OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 AND 2013
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
To: The Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Adaptive Medias, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of Adaptive Medias, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. Adaptive Medias, Inc.’s
management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our
audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate
in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Adaptive Medias, Inc. as of December
31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for years then ended in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company has incurred losses from operations, had negative working capital of $577,440 and an accumulated
deficit of $40,172,716 at December 31, 2014, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s
plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
RAMIREZ JIMENEZ INTERNATIONAL CPAs
Irvine, California
March 26, 2015
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| |
December 31, | | |
December 31, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Assets | |
| | | |
| | |
Current assets: | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash | |
$ | 2,255,784 | | |
$ | 22,188 | |
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $242,632 and $15,393, at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively | |
| 1,754,893 | | |
| 609,993 | |
Prepaid expenses | |
| 61,478 | | |
| 126321 | |
Total current assets | |
| 4,072,155 | | |
| 758,502 | |
Furniture and fixtures, net | |
| 72,476 | | |
| 2,044 | |
Other assets: | |
| | | |
| | |
Intangible assets, net | |
| 8,018,170 | | |
| 2,878,440 | |
Deposits | |
| 34,843 | | |
| 5,793 | |
Total other assets | |
| 8,053,013 | | |
| 2,884,233 | |
Total assets | |
$ | 12,197,644 | | |
$ | 3,644,779 | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | |
| | | |
| | |
Current liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
$ | 4,649,595 | | |
$ | 1,711,179 | |
Convertible notes payable | |
| - | | |
| 300,000 | |
Total current liabilities | |
| 4,649,595 | | |
| 2,011,179 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Other liabilities | |
| 37,396 | | |
| - | |
Total liabilities | |
| 4,686,991 | | |
| 2,011,179 | |
Stockholders' Equity: | |
| | | |
| | |
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized; 13,869,771 and 4,963,022 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively | |
| 13,866 | | |
| 4,963 | |
Additional paid in capital | |
| 47,669,503 | | |
| 22,943,002 | |
Common stock payable | |
| - | | |
| 8,625 | |
Accumulated deficit | |
| (40,172,716 | ) | |
| (21,322,990 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | |
| 7,510,653 | | |
| 1,633,600 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | |
$ | 12,197,644 | | |
$ | 3,644,779 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
| |
For the years ended | |
| |
December 31, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Revenue | |
$ | 5,075,226 | | |
$ | 1,030,267 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cost of revenue | |
| 3,940,350 | | |
| 743,959 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Gross profit | |
| 1,134,876 | | |
| 286,308 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Operating expenses: | |
| | | |
| | |
Legal and professional fees | |
| 1,506,016 | | |
| 1,121,661 | |
Research and development | |
| 1,381,873 | | |
| 255,745 | |
General and administrative expenses | |
| 4,044,468 | | |
| 2,197,784 | |
Selling expenses | |
| 1,712,328 | | |
| - | |
Depreciation and amortization | |
| 1,485,384 | | |
| 206,416 | |
Stock compensation expense | |
| 1,206,852 | | |
| 4,154,665 | |
Impairment of intangibles | |
| 8,604,315 | | |
| 342,610 | |
Loss on disposal on equipment | |
| 643 | | |
| - | |
Total operating expenses | |
| 19,941,879 | | |
| 8,278,881 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Loss from operations | |
| (18,807,003 | ) | |
| (7,992,573 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Other (income) expense: | |
| | | |
| | |
Other income | |
| (18,827 | ) | |
| - | |
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt | |
| 19,379 | | |
| (15,988 | ) |
Interest expense | |
| 42,171 | | |
| 486,396 | |
Total other expense | |
| 42,723 | | |
| 470,408 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | (18,849,726 | ) | |
$ | (8,462,981 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted | |
$ | (2.04 | ) | |
$ | (2.52 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted | |
| 9,233,075 | | |
| 3,355,003 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
| |
| | |
| | |
Additional | | |
Common | | |
| | |
Total | |
| |
Common Stock | | |
Paid-in | | |
Stock | | |
Accumulated | | |
Stockholders’ | |
| |
Shares | | |
Amount | | |
Capital | | |
Payable | | |
Deficit | | |
Equity | |
Balance, January 1, 2013 | |
| 2,068,990 | | |
| 2,069 | | |
| 12,062,615 | | |
| 8,625 | | |
| (12,860,009 | ) | |
| (786,700 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Stock-based compensation / common shares issued for services | |
| 360,589 | | |
| 361 | | |
| 4,154,304 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 4,154,665 | |
Amortization of debt discount | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 424,600 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 424,600 | |
Common shares issued for cash-less exercise of warrants | |
| 95,834 | | |
| 96 | | |
| 2,779 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 2,875 | |
Common shares issued for cash | |
| 915,278 | | |
| 915 | | |
| 2,364,085 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 2,365,000 | |
Common shares issued for settlement of accounts payable | |
| 144,643 | | |
| 145 | | |
| 577,660 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 577,805 | |
Stock issued for merger and acquisition | |
| 1,351,465 | | |
| 1,351 | | |
| 3,297,985 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 3,299,336 | |
Common shares issued for conversion/debt | |
| 26,223 | | |
| 26 | | |
| 58,974 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 59,000 | |
Net loss | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (8,462,981 | ) | |
| (8,462,981 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2013 | |
$ | 4,963,022 | | |
$ | 4,963 | | |
$ | 22,943,002 | | |
$ | 8,625 | | |
$ | (21,322,990 | ) | |
$ | 1,633,600 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Stock-based compensation / common shares issued for services | |
| 555,309 | | |
| 549 | | |
| 2,144,477 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 2,145,026 | |
Stock issued for merger | |
| 5,000,000 | | |
| 5,000 | | |
| 14,995,000 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 15,000,000 | |
Common shares issued for cash | |
| 3,239,780 | | |
| 3,240 | | |
| 7,286,260 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 7,289,500 | |
Common stock payable | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (8,625 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (8,625 | ) |
Common shares issued for conversion/debt | |
| 46,667 | | |
| 47 | | |
| 104,953 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 105,000 | |
Common shares issued for settlement of accounts payable | |
| 64,993 | | |
| 67 | | |
| 195,811 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 195,878 | |
Net loss | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (18,849,726 | ) | |
| (18,849,726 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2014 | |
$ | 13,869,771 | | |
$ | 13,866 | | |
$ | 47,669,503 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (40,172,716 | ) | |
$ | 7,510,653 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| |
For the year ended | |
| |
December 31, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Cash flows from operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | (18,849,726 | ) | |
$ | (8,462,981 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss | |
| | | |
| | |
to net cash used in operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Depreciation | |
| 25,117 | | |
| 447 | |
Amortization of intangibles | |
| 1,460,267 | | |
| 205,969 | |
Allowance for bad debts | |
| 326,398 | | |
| 15,393 | |
Impairment of intangibles | |
| 8,604,315 | | |
| 342,610 | |
Common stock issued for services / interest | |
| 2,145,026 | | |
| 4,154,665 | |
Amortization of debt discount on notes payable | |
| - | | |
| 424,600 | |
(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt | |
| 19,379 | | |
| (15,988 | ) |
Loss on disposal on equipment | |
| 643 | | |
| - | |
Change in operating assets and liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts receivable | |
| (1,471,298 | ) | |
| (466,224 | ) |
Prepaid expenses | |
| 64,843 | | |
| 376,108 | |
Deposits | |
| (29,050 | ) | |
| 10,761 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses related parties | |
| - | | |
| (10,790 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
| 3,194,915 | | |
| 597,464 | |
Other liabilities | |
| 37,396 | | |
| - | |
Net cash flows used in operating activities | |
| (4,471,775 | ) | |
| (2,827,966 | ) |
Cash flows from investing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Purchase of property and equipment | |
| (14,079 | ) | |
| (2,491 | ) |
Purchase of intangibles | |
| (286,425 | ) | |
| | |
Net cash flows used in investing activities | |
| (300,504 | ) | |
| (2,491 | ) |
Cash flows from financing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Payments of convertible notes payable | |
| (275,000 | ) | |
| (223,700 | ) |
Proceeds from convertible note | |
| - | | |
| 582,700 | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | |
| 7,289,500 | | |
| 2,365,000 | |
Cash acquired in acquisition | |
| - | | |
| 65,359 | |
Common stock payable | |
| (8,625 | ) | |
| - | |
Net cash flows provided by financing activities | |
| 7,005,875 | | |
| 2,789,359 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net (decrease) increase in cash | |
| 2,233,596 | | |
| (41,098 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash, beginning of year | |
| 22,188 | | |
| 63,286 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash, end of year | |
$ | 2,255,784 | | |
$ | 22,188 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash paid during the year for: | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest | |
$ | 42,171 | | |
$ | - | |
Income taxes | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Discount on convertible notes | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 424,600 | |
Common stock issued for conversion of debt | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 59,000 | |
Common stock issued to satisfy accounts payable | |
$ | 195,878 | | |
$ | 577,805 | |
Common stock issued for cash-less warrant exercise | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 2,875 | |
Increase (decrease) in prepaid common stock compensation | |
$ | 346,667 | | |
$ | - | |
Issuance of common stock for repayment of convertible note | |
$ | 105,000 | | |
$ | - | |
Common stock issued for merger/acquisition consideration | |
$ | 15,000,000 | | |
$ | 3,299,336 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
Note 1 – Organization and Nature
of Business
Adaptive Medias, Inc., formerly known
as “Mimvi, Inc.,” formerly known as “Fashion Net, Inc.” (“Adaptive Medias” or the “Company”),
was formed on August 7, 2007 under the laws of the State of Nevada. On November 6, 2013, the Company changed its name to Adaptive
Medias, Inc. in order to better and more fully demonstrate the Company’s emphasis on providing a supply-side platform for
mobile, video and online display advertising. In connection with the name change, effective on November 6, 2013, the Company’s
ticker symbol was changed to ADTM.
The Company is a technology company that
focuses on providing digital video and mobile solutions for publishers and content owners who need an easy, efficient, centralized
solution for video content management, delivery, syndication and monetization. The platform provides the Company’s proprietary,
mobile-first video player that was designed to optimize playback in mobile devices but allows customers to use their own or third
party video players. The platform also (1) allows customers to serve advertisements that are direct-by their own sales teams or
sold by the Company or a combination, and (2) provides premium content for publishers who need digital video to offer to their
audiences to supplement the customers’ own video library.
The Company grew organically and through
three acquisitions over the past 18 months and invested in integrated the different platforms that were acquired.
Adaptive Media, Inc. Transaction
On July 1, 2013, the Company entered into
an agreement whereby it acquired Adaptive Media as a wholly owned subsidiary. Adaptive Media shareholders were issued 1,116,667
share of common stock constituting approximately 30% of the then outstanding stock of the Company. The following table summarizes
the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition and the allocation of the
purchase price to the fair value of net assets acquired:
Cash | |
$ | 65,359 | |
Accounts receivable, net | |
| 159,162 | |
Other | |
| 15,346 | |
Intangible assets | |
| 2,552,214 | |
Deposits | |
| 1,554 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | |
| (281,135 | ) |
Total purchase price allocated | |
$ | 2,512,500 | |
Ember, Inc. Transaction
On December 4, 2013, the Company acquired
Ember, Inc. (“Ember”). Ember shareholders were issued 233,334 shares of common stock, constituting approximately 5.3%
of the outstanding stock of the Company.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition and the allocation of the purchase price to the fair value
of net assets acquired:
Assembled Workforce | |
$ | 97,000 | |
Developed Software | |
| 236,000 | |
Goodwill | |
| 188,000 | |
Total purchase price allocated | |
$ | 521,000 | |
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
Media Graph Transaction
On July 15, 2014, the Company executed
a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with OneScreen, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“OneScreen”),
Media Graph, Inc., a Nevada corporation and OneScreen’s spun-off former subsidiary (“Media Graph”), and the
shareholders of Media Graph (the “Selling Shareholders”), effective June 30, 2014, whereby the Company acquired certain
assets of OneScreen, which immediately prior thereto were held by Media Graph, in exchange for 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock (the “Acquisition”). On July 15, 2014, the parties to the Agreement executed the First Amendment to the
Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Amendment”), which (i) amended the effective date of the Agreement to July 15, 2014,
(ii) limited the scope of Section 5.04 of the Agreement to apply only to the Restricted Selling Shareholders, as defined in the
Amendment, and (iii) added the Selling Shareholders as a signatory to the Agreement.
The following table summarizes the estimated
fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition and the allocation of the purchase price
to the fair value of net assets acquired:
Fixed assets | |
$ | 82,112 | |
Intangibles | |
| 6,320,000 | |
Goodwill | |
| 8,597,888 | |
Total purchase price allocated | |
$ | 15,000,000 | |
Going Concern
The Company’s consolidated financial
statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern
which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has
not yet established an ongoing source of revenue sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern.
As of December 31, 2014, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $40,172,716 and generated net losses in 2014 and 2013. The
ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating
losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease or reduce
its operations.
In order to continue as a going concern,
the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. As of December 31, 2014, the Company has continued to
raise funds through the sale of its equity securities to obtain additional operating capital. The Company is dependent upon its
ability, and will continue to attempt, to secure additional equity and/or debt financing until the
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
Company can earn revenue and realize positive
cash flow from its operations. There are no assurances that the Company will be
successful in earning revenue and realizing
positive cash flow from its operations. Without sufficient financing it would be unlikely that the Company will continue as a
going concern.
Based on the Company’s current rate
of cash outflows, cash on hand and proceeds from the recent sale of equity securities, management believes that its current cash
will not be sufficient to meet the anticipated cash needs for working capital for the next 12 months.
The Company’s plans with respect
to its liquidity issues include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
1) |
Continue
to raise financing through the sale of its equity and/or debt securities; |
|
2) |
Continue
to issue restricted stock for compensation due to consultants and for its legacy accounts payable in lieu of cash payments;
and |
|
3) |
Seek additional
capital in the public equity markets to continue its operations as it rolls out its current products in development, respond
to competitive pressures, develops new products and services, and supports new strategic partnerships. The Company is currently
evaluating additional equity financing opportunities and may execute them when appropriate. However, there can be no assurances
that the Company can consummate such a transaction, or consummate a transaction at favorable pricing. |
The ability of the Company to continue
as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and
eventually secure other sources of financing and achieve profitable operations. These consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification
of liabilities that might result from this uncertainty.
Note 2 – Basis of Presentation
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
of America, and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and reflect all adjustments, consisting
of normal recurring adjustments, which management believes are necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
On April 14, 2014, the shareholders of
the Company authorized its Board of Directors to effectuate a reverse stock split, effective as of the close of business on July
14, 2014. As a result of the reverse stock split, every thirty issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock
was changed and converted into one share of common stock. Following the reverse stock split, the Company continues to have 300,000,000
shares of common stock authorized for issuance. As required by the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB”)
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 260-10-55-12 “Earnings per Share” all share and
per-share computations presented in these consolidated financial statements are based on the new number of shares after the reverse
stock split.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements
include the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made
to amounts in prior periods to conform to the current period presentation. All reclassifications have been applied consistently
to the periods presented.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when earned
and related costs of sales and expenses when incurred. The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 605-10-S99, Revenue
Recognition, Overall, SEC Materials ("Section 605-10-S99"). Section 605-10-S99 requires that four basic criteria
must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services
rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Cost of revenue consists of the
cost of the purchased goods and labor related to the corresponding sales transaction. When a right of return exists, the Company
defers revenues until the right of return expires. The Company recognizes revenue from services at the time the services are completed.
Net Loss Per Share Calculation
Net loss per share is provided in accordance
with FASB ASC 260-10, Earnings per Share. Basic net loss per common share ("EPS") is computed by dividing
net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average shares outstanding, assuming all
dilutive potential common shares were issued, unless doing so is anti-dilutive. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding
for computing basic and diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were 9,233,075 and 3,355,003 respectively.
Potential dilutive common shares amount to 4,357,604 and 5,159,744 in 2014 and 2013, respectively, and were not used in the calculation
of diluted EPS as the impact would be anti-dilutive.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of websites,
customer lists, content and publisher relationships, developed technology and trade names and are stated at cost. Expenditures
of costs incurred to renew or extend the term of a recognized intangible asset and materially extend the useful life are capitalized.
When assets are sold or otherwise written off due to asset impairment, the cost and the related accumulated amortization are removed
from the accounts and any realized gain or loss is recognized at that time. Useful lives of intangible assets are periodically
evaluated for reasonableness and the assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount may no longer be recoverable.
Internal Use Software Development Costs
The Company incurs costs to develop software
for internal use. The Company expenses all costs that relate to the planning and post implementation phases of development as
research and development expense. The Company capitalizes costs when preliminary efforts are successfully completed, management
has authorized and committed project funding, and it is probable that the project will be completed and will be used as intended.
Costs incurred for enhancements that are expected to result in additional material functionality are capitalized. The Company
capitalized $286,425 and $0 in internal use software costs during the years ended December 31 2014 and 2013, respectively, which
are included in intangible assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Amortization commences when the software
is ready for its intended use and the amortization period is the estimated useful life of the related asset, which is generally
two to three years. Amortization expense totaled $21,705 and $0 for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
Intangible Assets – Goodwill
The Company's goodwill associated with
its acquisitions is not amortized. Management reviews goodwill for impairment at least on an annual basis and at other times when
existing conditions raise substantial questions about their recoverability. An impairment charge is recognized in the period which
management determines that the assets are impaired. Recoverability is assessed based on the carrying amount of the asset and its
fair value which is generally determined based on the sum of the undiscounted cash flows that are expected to result from the
use and the eventual disposal of the asset, as well as specific appraisal in certain instances. An impairment loss is recognized
when the carrying amount is not recoverable and exceeds fair value.
Convertible Notes Payable
The Company evaluated the embedded conversion
features within the convertible debt issued in 2013 under FASB ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” and
determined that neither the embedded conversion feature nor the warrants qualified for derivative accounting. Additionally, the
instruments were evaluated under FASB ASC Topic 470-20 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options” for
consideration of any beneficial conversion features.
It was concluded that a beneficial conversion
feature existed for the convertible debt due to the relative fair value of the warrants issued with the debt.
The fair value of the warrants granted
as a portion of the placement fee in connection with the convertible debt issued in 2013 were estimated to be $74,955 at the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions: market value of the stock on the grant date
was $0.1250; risk-free interest rate of 3.90%; dividend yield of 0%; volatility factor of 400%; weighted average expected life
of 3 years; expected forfeiture rate of 0%.
The total debt discount recorded on the
date of issuance was $424,600 (warrant relative fair value of approximately $222,221 and the beneficial conversion feature was
approximately $202,379) which was amortized to interest expense over the term of the note. The Company had amortized $424,600
to interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013.
On February 10, 2014, the Company and
Gemini Master Fund Ltd. (“Gemini”) settled the obligations contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement and due under
the convertible note payable and cancelled the 133,334 warrants in exchange for: (i) the conversion of $105,000 of note principal
at $0.075 per share, for a total of 46,667 shares of Company common stock, pursuant to the terms of the Note; and (ii) a cash
payment of $275,000. The terms of this settlement were memorialized in the Settlement and General Release Agreement which settled
all outstanding obligations with Gemini.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for its income taxes
in accordance with Income Taxes Topic of the FASB ASC 740, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for
future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax
rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations in the period that includes
the enactment date.
The Company also follows ASC 740-10-25,
which provides detailed guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions
recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes”.
ASC 740-10-25 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement
of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest
and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company believes it is no longer subject to income
tax examinations for the years prior to 2011.
Stock Based Compensation
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation
in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 Stock Compensation, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation
expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and employee stock
purchases related to an employee stock purchase plan based on the estimated fair values.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
For non-employee stock-based compensation,
the Company applies FASB ASC Topic 505 Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, which requires stock-based compensation
related to non-employees to be accounted for based on the fair value of the related stock or options or the fair value of the
services on the grant date, whichever is more readily determinable in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a
Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (Topic 740). ASU 2013-11 requires that unrecognized tax benefits
be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar
tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except in certain circumstances. When those circumstances exist, the unrecognized tax
benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The
Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 did not have a significant impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB and the International
Accounting Standards Board jointly issued ASU No. 2014-9, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which clarifies the
principles for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting
Standards. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods
or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for
those goods and services. This ASU is effective for public entities for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15,
2016. Early adoption is not permitted under U.S. GAAP and retrospective application is permitted, but not required. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No.
2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statement-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's
Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which provides guidance under U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to
evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related
footnote disclosures. In doing so, the amendments should reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. This
ASU is effective for all entities and for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2014-15 is not expected to have a significant
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Note 3 – Intangible Assets
The following table summarizes the intangible assets as of
December 31, 2014 and 2013.
| |
Useful
Lives | |
December 31, 2014 | | |
December 31, 2013 | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
Websites | |
2 years | |
$ | 11,297 | | |
$ | 11,296 | |
Customer lists | |
1 years | |
| 306,505 | | |
| 306,505 | |
Developed technology | |
3 years | |
| 4,883,034 | | |
| 410,416 | |
Trade names | |
3 years | |
| 85,607 | | |
| 85,607 | |
| |
| |
| 5,286,443 | | |
| 813,824 | |
Less: accumulated amortization | |
| |
$ | (1,666,237 | ) | |
$ | (205,969 | ) |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Identifiable intangibles, net | |
| |
| 3,620,206 | | |
| 607,855 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Goodwill | |
| |
| 4,397,964 | | |
| 2,270,585 | |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Intangible assets, net | |
| |
$ | 8,018,170 | | |
$ | 2,878,440 | |
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
For the years ended December 31, 2014, the amortization for
intangible assets was $1,460,267 and $205,969, respectively. The amortization expense for the years ending December 31, 2015,
2016 and 2017 are expected to be approximately $ 2,551,365, $2,245,488, and $489,590, respectively.
During 2014, the Company determined that
the intangible assets associated with the Adaptive Media transaction were partially impaired and $87,207 was recognized as impairment
of intangibles in the accompanying 2014 consolidated statement of operations as its fair value is less than its carrying book
value. The goodwill associated with this transaction was also impaired in the amount of $61,892.
During 2014, the Company determined that
the intangible assets associated with the Media Graph transaction were partially impaired and $2,292,599 was recognized as impairment
of intangibles in the accompanying 2014 consolidated statement of operations, as their fair value is less than their carrying
book value. The goodwill associated with this transaction was also impaired for $6,162,617.
The Company also recorded an impairment
charge in the amount of $342,610 during 2013 relating an acquisition made in 2012.
Note 4 – Income Taxes
The Company
had net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) as of December 31, 2014 of approximately $35.5 million for
federal tax purposes and approximately $34.7 million for state tax purposes, portions of which are expiring at various years
through 2034. The Company may be able to utilize its NOLs to reduce future federal and state income tax liabilities. However,
these NOLs are subject to various limitations under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 382. IRC Section 382 limits
the use of NOLs to the extent there has been an ownership change of more than 50 percentage points. In addition, the NOL carryforwards
are subject to examination by the taxing authority and could be adjusted or disallowed due to such exams. Although the Company
has not undergone an IRC Section 382 analysis, it is possible that the utilization of the NOLs could be significantly limited.
Components of net deferred tax assets
(liabilities), including a valuation allowance, are as follows at December 31:
| |
December 31, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Net operating loss carryforwards | |
| 14,119,000 | | |
| 4,043,000 | |
Stock-based compensation | |
| 3,972,000 | | |
| 3,244,000 | |
Other | |
| 124,000 | | |
| (236,000 | ) |
Valuation allowance | |
| (18,215,000 | ) | |
| (7,051,000 | ) |
Total deferred tax assets | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
The change in the valuation allowance
for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $11,164,000 and $5,522,115, respectively. In assessing the recovery
of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax
assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable
income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversals of
future deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a
result, management determined it was more likely than not the deferred tax assets would not be realized as of December 31, 2014
and 2013, and recorded a full valuation allowance.
Reconciliation between the statutory rate and the effective
tax rate is as follows at December 31, 2014:
| |
December 31, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
Tax provision at statutory federal rate | |
| 34 | % | |
| 34 | % |
State Income tax expense, net of federal benefit | |
| 4 | % | |
| 6 | % |
True up beginning deferreds | |
| 0 | % | |
| 37 | % |
Change in valuation allowance | |
| (27 | )% | |
| (65) | % |
Permanent differences | |
| (11 | )% | |
| (10) | % |
Other | |
| (0 | )% | |
| (2) | % |
Effective tax rate | |
| (0 | )% | |
| 0 | % |
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
Note 5 – Notes Payable
Convertible Notes
On May 21, 2013, the Company and Gemini
entered into a Security Purchase Agreement for the purchase and sale of a convertible promissory note agreement for a principal
amount of $425,000 with an original issue discount of $25,000, a legal fee payment requirement of $5,000 and a placement
agent fee of $32,000 for net proceeds of $363,000. A portion of the placement agent fee was paid through the issuance of
22,000 warrants to purchase common stock of the Company. The value of these warrants was estimated at $74,955 using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following inputs: discount rate of 3.90%, volatility of 400% and a term of three years.
The maturity date was December 31,
2013 with an annual interest rate of 8%. At any time after the issuance date until the note was no longer outstanding,
this note was convertible, in whole or in part, into 141,667 shares of common stock of the Company at a per share price of
$3.00, at the option of the holder subject to certain conversion limitations. Concurrently with the issuance of such note, the
holder was granted a warrant to purchase 133,334 shares of the Company’s common stock with a strike price of $7.50,
subject to certain potential adjustments to the strike price and including a cash-less exercise provision. The fair value of these
warrants was estimated at $222,221 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following inputs: Discount Rate
of 3.90% and Volatility of 400% and a term of three years.
On December 16, 2013 the Company amended
the note agreement such that:
(a) the Company would immediately
pay $100,000 to Holder (the “Payment”), and such Payment would not be subject to any prepayment premium;
(b) Holder would convert $59,000
of unpaid principal into the common stock of the Company at $2.25 per share;
(c) the conversion price contemplated
by the original documents would be changed to equal $2.25 per share;
(d) the total outstanding balance
of the loan contemplated by the original documents would be reduced to $300,000; and
(e) the maturity date contemplated
by the original documents would be extended from December 31, 2013 until May 31, 2014.
The respective discounts were being amortized
over the period from the commitment date until the notes become convertible by the holder and all such discounts were fully amortized
by December 31, 2013.
As of December 31, 2013, outstanding convertible
notes payable were $300,000. As of December 31, 2014, there were no outstanding convertible notes payable balance. On February
10, 2014, the Company and Gemini settled the obligations under the convertible note payable and cancelled the 133,334 warrants
in exchange for: (i) the conversion of $105,000 of note principal at $2.25 per share, for a total of 46,667 shares of Company
common stock, and (ii) a cash payment of $275,000. The terms of this settlement were memorialized in the Settlement and General
Release Agreement. This agreement settled all outstanding obligations with Gemini. In connection with this transaction, the Company
recognized a loss on the settlement of the debt in the amount of $79,014.
On May 15, 2013, the Company entered into
an unsecured convertible note agreement with a principal amount of $75,000 and paid financing fees of $4,000 for net
proceeds of $71,000. The maturity date was September 1, 2013 with an annual interest rate of 10%. As of December
31, 2013, this note was paid in-full.
On June 14, 2013, the Company entered
into a convertible note agreement with a principal amount of $35,000 and paid financing fees of $2,500 for net proceeds
of $32,500. The maturity date of this note was July 1, 2013 with an annual interest of 10%. As of December 31,
2013, this note was paid in-full.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
Short-Term Advances
During the year ended December 31, 2013,
the Company received short term advances in aggregate amount of $41,200 from two parties with no formal payment arrangements
and no interest requirements. As of December 31, 2013, the $41,200 had been paid in-full.
Note 6 – Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Preferred Stock
The Company's articles of incorporation authorize the Company
to issue up to 50,000,000 preferred shares of $0.001 par value, having preferences to be determined by the Board
of Directors for dividends, and liquidation of the Company's assets. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no preferred
shares outstanding.
Common Stock
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the
Company had 300,000,000, $0.001 par value shares of common stock authorized. The holders are entitled to one vote for each share
on matters submitted to a vote to shareholders, and to share pro rata in all dividends payable on common stock after payment of
dividends on any preferred shares having preference in payment of dividends.
During the year ended December 31, 2014
the Company issued 555,309 shares of its common stock to various consultants in exchange for services rendered with an aggregate
fair value of $2,145,026 or $3.86 per share on average. The Company also issued and sold 3,239,780 shares of its common stock
to several accredited investors for an aggregate purchase price of $7,289,500 or $2.25 per share on average. The Company issued
64,993 shares of its common stock for settlement of $195,879 of accounts payable or $3.01 per share on average. The Company issued
5,000,000 shares of its common stock in connection with merger transactions with a fair value of $15,000,000 or $3.00 per share
on average. Finally, in the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 46,667 shares of its common stock in connection with
a convertible note with a fair value of $105,000 or $2.25 per share.
The total number of shares outstanding
as of December 31, 2014 was 13,869,771.
During the year ended December 31, 2013
the Company issued 360,589 shares of its common stock to various consultants in exchange for services rendered with an aggregate
fair value of $4,154,665 or $11.52 per share on average. The Company also issued 95,834 shares of its common stock to consultants
in a cash-less exercise of warrants. Additionally, the Company issued and sold 915,278 shares of its common stock to several accredited
investors for an aggregate purchase price of $2,365,000 or $2.58 per share on average. The Company issued 144,643 shares of its
common stock for settlement of $577,805 of accounts payable or $3.99 per share on average. The Company issued 1,351,465 shares
of its common stock in connection with merger transactions with a fair value of $3,299,336 or $2.44 per share on average. This
number includes 6,667 shares held in escrow in connection to the transaction with Lone Wolf, Inc., and 16,293 shares that were
issued as part of the transaction with Ember, Inc. that were canceled on December 31, 2013. Finally, in the year ended December
31, 2013, the Company issued 26,223 shares of its common stock in connection with a convertible note with a fair value of $59,000
or $2.25 per share.
The total number of shares outstanding
as of December 31, 2013 was 4,963,022.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
Note 7 – Warrants and Options
Stock Option Plans
The Company’s shareholders approved
the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) on November 2, 2010. The Plan provides for the grant
of non-statutory or incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and other stock-based
awards to the Company’s employees, Officers, Directors or consultants. The Company’s Board of Directors administers
the 2010 Plan, selects the individuals to whom options will be granted, determines the number of options to be granted, and the
term and exercise price of each option. Stock options granted pursuant to the terms of the 2010 Plan generally cannot be granted
with an exercise price of less than 100% of the fair market value on the date of the grant. The term of the options granted under
the 2010 Plan cannot be greater than 10 years. Options vest at varying rates generally over three to five years along with performance
based options.
In September 2013, the Company approved
the increase in the number of shares issuable pursuant to the 2010 Plan to 15,000,000. In December 2013, the Company’s Board
of Directors approved an amendment to the Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan which increased the number of shares
issuable pursuant to the Plan by 15,000,000 to 30,000,000 shares. Both amendments have also been approved by the Company’s
shareholders. Upon completion of the Reverse Stock Split on April 14, 2014, the Company continues to have 30,000,000 shares issuable
pursuant to the 2010 Plan.
During the year ended December 31, 2014, options for 1,058,770
shares had been granted, with 0 shares exercised, 122,849 shares forfeited and cancelled and 1,477,977 outstanding and 28,522,023
shares available for future grant. Shares authorized under the amended 2010 Plan will be available for issuance pursuant to options
or awards granted under the Plan.
During the year ended December 31, 2013,
options for 774,750 shares had been granted, with 10,000 shares exercised, 567,528 forfeited and 542,056 outstanding and 29,457,944
shares available for future grant.
The following
table reflects the option activity during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
| |
Common | | |
Average | |
| |
Shares | | |
Exercise Price | |
| |
| | |
| |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2012 | |
| 344,834 | | |
$ | 12.60 | |
Granted | |
| 774,750 | | |
| 4.80 | |
Exercised | |
| (10,000 | ) | |
| 6.00 | |
Forfeited, cancelled, expired | |
| (567,528 | ) | |
| 9.30 | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013 | |
| 542,056 | | |
$ | 3.60 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| 1,058,770 | | |
| 0.00 | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Forfeited, cancelled, expired | |
| (122,849 | ) | |
| 2.59 | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 | |
| 1,477,977 | | |
$ | 1.11 | |
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company issued
774,750 options to purchase its common stock while recording stock compensation expense for all of the options of $2,551,367 using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 3-5 years, risk free interest rate ranging
from 0.07% ~ $0.75%, a dividend yield of 0% and a volatility rate of 400%
For the year ended December 31, 2014,
the Company granted 1,058,770 options to purchase its common stock while recording stock compensation expense for these options
of $471,043 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 5 years, risk free interest
rate ranging from 1.50% ~ 1.51%, a dividend yield of 0% and a volatility rate ranging from 133% ~ 145%. In that same period, 122,849
stock options were cancelled by the Company as they had been issued to certain consultants and employees who no longer provided
services to the Company.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
For
the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded $2,145,026 and $2,551,367as stock compensation expense for these
options, respectively. Of the total in 2014, $1,206,852 is reflected
as stock compensation expense and $938,174 is reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses.
2013 Consultant Stock Plan
The Company’s Board of Directors
adopted the 2013 Consultant Stock Plan (the “2013 Plan”) on February 5, 2013 and reserved 2,000,000 shares
of the Company’s common stock for issuance thereunder. During the year ended December 31, 2013, all 2,000,000 shares were
issued under this 2013 Plan.
Warrants
The following table reflects warrant activity during the years
ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
| |
Warrants for | | |
Weighted | |
| |
Common | | |
Average | |
| |
Shares | | |
Exercise Price | |
Outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2012 | |
| 574,667 | | |
$ | 9.90 | |
Granted | |
| 1,335,959 | | |
$ | 4.20 | |
Exercised – cash | |
| (66,667 | ) | |
$ | 3.00 | |
Exercised - cash-less exercise | |
| (95,834 | ) | |
$ | 3.00 | |
Forfeited, cancelled, expired | |
| (197,166 | ) | |
$ | 6.00 | |
Outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2013 | |
| 1,550,959 | | |
$ | 4.80 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| 1,462,002 | | |
$ | 3.00 | |
Exercised – cash | |
| - | | |
$ | - | |
Exercised - cash-less exercise | |
| - | | |
$ | - | |
Forfeited, cancelled, expired | |
| (133,334 | ) | |
$ | 2.25 | |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 | |
| 2,879,627 | | |
$ | 4.00 | |
During the year ended December 31, 2013,
the Company issued 1,335,959 warrants to purchase its common stock and recorded deferred financing cost for 133,333 warrants
with an estimated fair value of $4,955 and debt discount of $222,221 for 133,334 warrants using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 3 years, risk free interest rate ranging from 3.90%,
a dividend yield of 0% and a volatility rate of 400% (see Note 5). The remaining warrants were issued with the sale
of common stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2014,
the Company issued 1,462,002 warrants to purchase its common stock. The warrants are non-forfeitable as of December 31, 2014.
In that same period, 133,334 warrants were cancelled in connection with a settlement of a note payable (see Note 5).
As of December 31, 2014, the Company maintained
total outstanding warrants to purchase 2,879,627 shares of its common stock at an average exercise price of $4.00 per share.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
Note 8– Commitments and Contingencies
Office Lease Agreements
The Company leases office space in Irvine, California under
two leases that expire at various dates through March 2017. The current monthly rent was approximately $13,100 per month.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
leases as of December 31, 2014 are as follows:
Years ending December 31, |
2015 | |
$ | 148,644 | |
2016 | |
$ | 140,400 | |
2017 | |
$ | 36,075 | |
Total: | |
$ | 325,119 | |
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2103 rent expense
was $135,533 and $82,824, respectively.
Minimum Fees
On July 1, 2014, the Company entered into
an agreement to purchase bandwidth for a period of 18 months with a total minimum amount of $413,775 due. Under the agreement,
the Company expensed $139,810 during the year ended December 31, 2014, of which $23,189 was paid and $116,621 is included in accounts
payable at December 31, 2014.
Legal Proceedings
In July 2013, the Company became aware
that a default judgment had been entered against Mimvi (now Adaptive Medias, Inc.) in favor of Mario Armando Wilson and against
the Company in the amount of $62,141 and the balance has been accruing interest. In 2014, the Company and Mr. Wilson reached a
settlement agreement in which the Company granted Mr. Wilson 19,629 unregistered shares of stock and a commitment that the shares
will be tradeable on June 3, 2015 at a value of $74,000 with any shortfall being paid in cash.
The Company was in an arbitration case
entitled Felix Chan v. Mimvi (now Adaptive Medias, Inc.) which was a proceeding before the American Arbitration Association.
On December 12, 2014, the Arbitrator issued an award against the Company in the amount of $348,803 and such amount has been accrued
as of December 31, 2014. The Company is exploring options to have the award set-aside or reduced.
On September 20, 2013, Eric Rice, a former
employee, sued the Company (Rice v. Adaptive Medias, etc., et al., LASC No. LC100816, Van Nuys Superior Court). The complaint
alleges that the Company breached Mr. Rice's employment agreement and made misrepresentations when the Company terminated Mr.
Rice. The complaint does not specify the amount of alleged damages. The Company denies any breach or misrepresentation, and the
Company denies that it owes Mr. Rice anything. The Company has filed a cross-complaint against Mr. Rice for damages and other
relief. Discovery is underway.
On July 29, 2013, Khoi Senderowicz filed
a lawsuit against the Company and two other individuals, Andrew Linton and Kasian Franks (Senderowicz v. Franks, etc., et al.,
Case No. RG13689457, Alameda County Superior Court). The suit alleges breach of leases for real property and damages to real property
and seeks $353,894 in alleged damages. The Company has responded to the Complaint and denied all claims and damages.
In April of 2014, the Company became
aware that a lawsuit was filed against the Company in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, California by Amanda Besemer,
who was an Advisory Board member of Mimvi from 2010-2012. Ms. Besemer seeks damages equivalent to $400,000 of stock or the cash
equivalent of such related to the termination of the Advisory Board role. The Company has responded to the Complaint and denied
the allegations. The Company has been informed that the case in Santa Clara has been dismissed and that Ms. Besemer intends to
refile the case in Southern California. As yet, the case has not been refiled.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014
and 2013
On November 7,
2014, a former employee notified the Company of a disagreement over compensation and other matters. A complaint has not been filed
and the former employee has expressed interest in settling the matter informally. The Company continues discovery and discussions
with the former employee.
The Company has
become aware of a claim by U-Chef, a creditor of OneScreen, in the amount of $93,237 (Ratatouille dba U-Chef v. OneScreen).
The Company's position is that this case has no merit and intends to vigorously defend against it.
On
January 27, 2015, the Company became aware of a recent cross-complaint filed by the former CEO of OneScreen. (Patel v. OneScreen,
Adaptive Media, Inc and Qayed Shareef). The Company's position is that this case has
no merit and intends to vigorously defend against it.
The Company does
not believe the ultimate outcome of these proceedings will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements.
Note 9– Concentrations
The following table reflects the concentration
of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively:
| |
Concentration for the years ended | |
| |
December 31, | |
| |
2014 | | |
2013 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Customer 1 | |
| 16 | % | |
| - | |
Customer 2 | |
| 15 | % | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Customer 3 | |
| | | |
| 5 | % |
Customer 4 | |
| | | |
| 4 | % |
Included in accounts receivable was $585,673
from these two (2) customers as of December 31, 2014.
Included in accounts receivable was $194,082
from the two customers as of December 31, 2013
Note 10 – Related party transactions
Effective October 1, 2014, the Company
contracted with its majority stockholder to provide consulting services. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized
$58,000 of expense for services rendered by the consultant, $42,000 of which was paid and $16,000 was included in accounts payable
as of December 31, 2014.
Effective April 1, 2014, the Company contracted
with a consultant to perform services requested by the Company on a non-exclusive basis. On May 7, 2014, this consultant was appointed
by the Company’s Board of Directors as a member thereof. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized $493,706
of expense for services rendered by this consultant/Director, $228,202 of which was paid in cash, $242,985 of which was paid with
restricted stock and $22,519 of which was included in accounts payable as of December 31, 2014.
Note 11- Subsequent Events
The Company follows the guidance in FASB
ASC Topic 855. Subsequent Events (“ASC 855”), which provides guidance to establish general standards
of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the consolidated financial statements
are issued or are available to be issued. ASC 855 sets forth (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which management
of a reporting entity evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the consolidated
financial statements, (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the
balance sheet date in its consolidated financial statements, and (iii) the disclosures that an entity should make about events
or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date.
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
Effective as of January 26, 2015,
the Chief Executive Officer was terminated by the Board of Directors from his position as Chief Executive Officer and Director.
The Board of Directors has established a committee of five individuals to actively search for a qualified successor Chief Executive
Officer.
Effective as of January 25, 2015,
the Company appointed an Acting Chief Operating Officer of the Company pursuant to a consulting agreement.
Effective as of March 9, 2015, the Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company resigned.
Effective as of March 11, 2015, Omar
Akram, a Director, was appointed President and Chief Financial Officer.
Issuance of Common Stock
Between January 1, 2015 and March 26,
2015, the Company issued 73,337 shares of common stock to various consultants and employees for services rendered with a fair
value of $203,698 or $2.77 per share on average.
Exhibit 24.1
ADAPTIVE MEDIAS, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each undersigned officer and/or director
of Adaptive Medias, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby make, constitute and appoint Omar Akram,
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and any other person holding the position of President or Chief Financial
Officer of the Company from time to time, or any one of them and each acting alone, as attorney-in-fact and agent of the undersigned,
each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, with the full power to execute, on behalf of the undersigned and to file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder:
| (i) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) with respect to the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2014; |
| (ii) | any and all amendments and exhibits to the Form 10-K, including this power of attorney; and |
| (iii) | any and all other documents to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or any state
securities commission or other regulatory authority, including any applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory
body, with respect to the Form 10-K, |
with full power and authority
to do and perform any and all acts and things whatsoever necessary, appropriate or desirable to be done in the premises, or in
the name, place and stead of the said director and/or officer, hereby ratifying and approving the acts of said attorney.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have subscribed to the above
as of March 20, 2015.
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
/s/ Omar Akram |
|
President (Principal Executive Officer), Chief |
Omar Akram |
|
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
and Director |
|
|
|
/s/ Bruce Wiseman |
|
Director |
Bruce Wiseman |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark Lambert |
|
Director |
Mark Lambert |
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
I, Omar Akram, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report
on 10-K of Adaptive Medias, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change
in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date:
March 26, 2015 |
/s/
Omar Akram |
|
|
Omar Akram |
|
|
President and Principal
Executive Officer |
|
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
I, Omar Akram, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report
on 10-K of Adaptive Medias, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change
in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date:
March 26, 2015 |
/s/
Omar Akram |
|
|
Omar Akram |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial
Officer) |
|
Exhibit 32.1
Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
(Subsections (A) and (B) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code)
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Adaptive Medias, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:
March 26, 2015 |
/s/
Omar Akram |
|
|
Omar Akram |
|
|
President and Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
|
Adaptive Medias (CE) (USOTC:ADTM)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jun 2024 até Jul 2024
Adaptive Medias (CE) (USOTC:ADTM)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jul 2023 até Jul 2024