NOTES
TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1
|
ORGANIZATION
AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
|
Organization
and Nature of Business
Code
Green Apparel Corp., formerly known as Gold Standard Mining Corp. (the “
Company
”) was incorporated in Nevada
on December 11, 2007 as Fluid Solutions, Inc. On May 6, 2009, Fluid Solutions, Inc. acquired all of the outstanding capital stock
of Gold Standard Mining Corp., a Wyoming corporation (“
GS Wyoming
”), in exchange for 100,669,998 shares of
its common stock pursuant to an Exchange Agreement dated May 6, 2009 with that corporation and its shareholders. Concurrently
with the acquisition, Pantelis Zachos, its Chief Executive Officer and a director, tendered 59,400,000 shares of common stock
back to Fluid Solutions, Inc. for retirement.
On
May 18, 2009, Fluid Solutions, Inc. changed its name to “
Gold Standard Mining Corp.
” and effected a 3.3 to
1 forward stock split. This split has been retroactively reflected in these financial statements.
As
of the date that the Company acquired GS Wyoming, GS Wyoming’s principal asset was rights under an Exchange Agreement, dated
February 9, 2009, pursuant to which GS Wyoming had agreed to acquire Rosszoloto Co. Ltd., a limited liability company organized
under the laws of Russia (“
Rosszoloto
”), in a stock exchange. Rosszoloto is engaged in the business of gold
mining in the Amur region of Russia near the border between Russia and China. The Company completed the acquisition of Rosszoloto
in June 2010. The Company issued a total of 100,669,998 shares of common stock to the shareholders of GS Wyoming.
In
the spring of 2011, during the course of preparation of financial statements of the Company, the Board of Directors concluded
that the Company could not get the financial information regarding Rosszoloto necessary for the financial statements of the Company,
including Rosszoloto, to be audited. Based on this, in May 2011, the Company rescinded the acquisition of Rosszoloto and has treated
the transaction as never having occurred. In connection with such rescission, the Company received back 51,499,998 shares of its
common stock that were issued to acquire GS Wyoming.
On
July 17, 2012, Gold Standard Mining Corp. changed its name to “
J.D. Hutt Corporation
” as it sought to engage
in opportunities outside of mining and natural resource exploration. From that time, and for a period of nearly two years, the
Company’s operations consisted of seeking other opportunities. On April 26, 2014, and with the appointment of George Powell
as its CEO and Director, the Company officially changed its business model to offer eco-friendly corporate apparel primarily constructed
from recycled textiles. To better reflect the Company’s change in business direction, the Company officially changed its
name to “
Code Green Apparel Corp.
” on May 15, 2015.
The
Company is a publicly held Nevada corporation, whose common stock trades on the OTC Market Group, Inc.’s Pink Sheets under
the trading symbol, “
CGAC.
”
Basis
of Presentation and Going Concern
The
accompanying unaudited interim condensed financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (“
GAAP
”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form
10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP
for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016. For further information, refer to the financial statements
and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
The
Company has generated only limited revenues from operations since inception. Since inception, it has incurred
significant losses to date, and as of September 30, 2016, has a working capital deficit of approximately $1,800,000, and an
accumulated deficit of approximately $12,800,000. The Company’s ability to continue its operations is uncertain and is
dependent upon its ability to implement a business plan sufficient to generate a positive cash flow and/or raise capital to
fund its operations.
These
financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities that might be
necessary should the Company be unable to continue operations in the normal course of business.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and timing of revenues and expenses,
the reported amounts and classification of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. These
estimates and assumptions are based on the Company’s historical results as well as management’s future expectations.
The Company’s actual results could vary materially from management’s estimates and assumptions. Additionally, interim
results may not be indicative of the Company’s results for future interim periods, or the Company’s annual results.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash
and cash equivalents include cash on hand and cash in time deposits, certificates of deposit and all highly liquid debt instruments
with original maturities of three months or less.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. The Company periodically reviews its inventories for indications
of slow movement and obsolescence and records an allowance when it is deemed necessary.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes gross sales when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title transfer has occurred, the price is fixed
or readily determinable, and collection is probable. It recognizes revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) 605, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”).
Stock
Based Compensation
The
Company from time to time issues shares of common stock for services. These issuances have been valued at the estimated fair market
value of the services since its stock is thinly traded and the Company has raised minimal cash from sales of stock.
Disclosure
About Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company estimates that the fair value of all financial instruments at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 do not differ materially
from the aggregate carrying values of its financial instruments recorded in the accompanying condensed balance sheets. The estimated
fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.
Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value, and accordingly, the estimates
are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The
Company evaluates its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify
as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument
is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported
in the statements of operations. For stock-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing
model to value the derivative instruments. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should
be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are
classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument
could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
The
Company has determined that certain convertible debt instruments outstanding as of the date of these financial statements include
an exercise price “
reset
” adjustment that qualifies as derivative financial instruments under the provisions
of ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in an Entity’s Own Stock (“
ASC 815-40
”). Certain of
the convertible debentures have a variable exercise price, thus are convertible into an indeterminate number of shares for which
we cannot determine if we have sufficient authorized shares to settle the transaction with. Accordingly, the embedded conversion
option is a derivative liability and is marked to market through earnings at the end of each reporting period. Any change in fair
value during the period recorded in earnings as “
Other income (expense) - gain (loss) on change in derivative liabilities.
”
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements
Using Fair Value Hierarchy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Derivative
liability – December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
824,468
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
824,468
|
|
Derivative
liability – September 30, 2016
|
|
$
|
961,428
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
961,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
824,468
|
|
Initial
measurement at issuance date of the notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431,118
|
|
Change
in derivative liability during the nine months ended September 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294,158
|
)
|
Balance
at September 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
961,428
|
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic
earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur
if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Any anti-dilutive effects
on net income (loss) per share are excluded. The Company has no potentially dilutive securities outstanding at September 30,
2016.
Income
Taxes
Provisions
for income taxes are based on taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred taxes on temporary differences between
the amount of taxable income and pretax financial income and between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported
amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the financial statements at currently
enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized
or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision
for income taxes.
In
assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon generation
of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences such as loss carry-forwards and tax credits become
deductible. Management considers projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment and ensuring
that the deferred tax asset valuation allowance is adjusted as appropriate.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
January 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update which requires, among other things, that entities measure equity investments
(except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) at fair
value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Under the standard, entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized
holding gains and losses on equity securities classified today as available for sale as a component of other comprehensive income.
For equity investments without readily determinable fair values the cost method of accounting is also eliminated, however subject
to certain exceptions, entities will be able to elect to record equity investments without readily determinable fair values at
cost, less impairment and plus or minus adjustments for observable price changes, with all such changes recognized in earnings.
This new standard does not change the guidance for classifying and measuring investments in debt securities and loans. The standard
is effective for us on July 1, 2018 (the first quarter of our 2019 fiscal year). The Company is currently evaluating the anticipated
impact of this standard on our financial statements.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) to increase transparency and comparability among organizations
by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements.
Topic 842 affects any entity that enters into a lease, with some specified scope exemptions. The guidance in this Update supersedes
Topic 840, Leases. The core principle of Topic 842 is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from
leases. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability)
and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For public companies, the amendments
in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal
years. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations
(Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)
that clarifies how to apply revenue recognition guidance related to whether an entity
is a principal or an agent. ASU 2016-08 clarifies that the analysis must focus on whether the entity has control of the goods
or services before they are transferred to the customer and provides additional guidance about how to apply the control principle
when services are provided and when goods or services are combined with other goods or services. The effective date for ASU 2016-08
is the same as the effective date of ASU 2014-09
as amended by
ASU 2015-14
,
for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including
interim periods
within those years.
The Company has not yet determined the impact
of
ASU 2016-08 on its
consolidated
financial
statements.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation, or ASU No. 2016-09. The areas for simplification
in this Update involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences,
classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. For public entities,
the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those
annual periods. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim
period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity
that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. Amendments related to the timing of when excess
tax benefits are recognized, minimum statutory withholding requirements, forfeitures, and intrinsic value should be applied using
a modified retrospective transition method by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period
in which the guidance is adopted. Amendments related to the presentation of employee taxes paid on the statement of cash flows
when an employer withholds shares to meet the minimum statutory withholding requirement should be applied retrospectively. Amendments
requiring recognition of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies in the income statement and the practical expedient for estimating
expected term should be applied prospectively. An entity may elect to apply the amendments related to the presentation of excess
tax benefits on the statement of cash flows using either a prospective transition method or a retrospective transition method.
We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU No. 2016-09 on our consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations
and Licensing
, which provides further guidance on identifying performance obligations and improves the operability and understandability
of licensing implementation guidance. The effective date for ASU 2016-10 is the same as the effective date of ASU 2014-09 as amended
by ASU 2015-14
,
for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including
interim periods
within those years.
The Company has not yet determined the impact
of
ASU 2016-10 on its
consolidated
financial
statements.
In
June 2016, the Company issued a $200,000 promissory note in connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement, see Note 8. The
note carries interest at 10% per annum and is due on June 23, 2018. The total outstanding principal amount of the note was
$200,000 at September 30, 2016. The accrued interest on the note was $5,425 at
September 30, 2016.
In
July 2016, the Company issued a promissory note in the amount of $82,500, which accrues interest at the rate of 12% per annum,
calculated yearly. The note is due on December 31, 2016, and a monthly late fee of $5,000 is payable for each month that the note
is past due. The note contains an original issue discount in the amount of $7,500. The remaining balance due at September 30,
2016 and December 31, 2015 was $82,500 and $-0-, respectively. There is no stated interest.
In
September 2016, the Company issued a promissory note with a term of six months, which accrues interest at 12% per annum, in
the amount of $10,000. The note contains an original issue discount in the amount of $650. The
remaining balance due at September 30, 2016 was $9,145.
On
May 1, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with Anubis Capital Partners, a business advisor. The agreement calls for
monthly payments of $2,500 in service fees along with the issuance of a $500,000 fully earned convertible note that accrues
interest at 8% per annum, convertible into common stock at a 50% discount to market. During December 2015, the Company issued
25,000,000 shares of common stock in conversion of $212,500 of principal on this convertible debt. At September 30, 2016 and
December 31, 2015, $20,000 and $50,000 was owed in service fees, accrued interest was $82,847 and $65,581 and the outstanding
convertible debt was $287,500 and $287,500, respectively.
During
the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued $173,500 of convertible notes. The convertible notes carry interest at
10% per annum, have a conversion rate equal to a 50% discount to market, and were due 24 months from the date of issuance,
June 2016 through September 2016. The note holders had the option to convert into shares of the Company’s common stock
after 180 days at 50% of the market price. During the second quarter of 2015, the Company issued 14,660,440 shares
of common stock upon conversion of the convertible notes. At September 30, 2016 and
December 31, 2015 the accrued and unpaid interest on the convertible notes was $12,027.
During
December 2015, the Company issued a one year convertible note in the amount of $175,000. The convertible note is due in
one year and contains a prepayment penalty of $25,000. The remaining balance outstanding at September 30, 2016 was
$175,000.
During
June 2016, the Company issued a one year convertible note in the principal amount of $121,325. The convertible note is due in
one year and contains an original issue discount in the amount of $15,825. The balance due at September 30,
2016 was $91,237.
During
September 2016, the Company issued a one year convertible note in the principal amount of $63,825. The convertible note is
due in one year and contains an original issue discount in the amount of $13,825. The balance due at September 30, 2016
was $62,641.
Derivative
Liability
On
May 1, 2014, the Company secured $500,000 in the form of a convertible promissory note. The note bears interest at the rate
of 8% per annum until it matures, or until there is an event of default. The note matured on May 1, 2015 and is currently in
default. The holder has the option to convert any balance of principal and interest into common stock of the Company. The
rate of conversion for the note is calculated as the lowest of the 20 trading closing prices immediately preceding such
conversion, discounted by 50%. A total of $287,500 remains outstanding as of September 30, 2016, and a total of $212,500 was
converted into 25,000,000 shares of common stock.
On
December 3, 2015, the Company secured $175,000 in the form of a convertible promissory note. The note does not bear interest
until or unless there is an event of default. The note matures on December 3, 2016. The holder has the option to convert any
balance of principal into common stock of the Company. The rate of conversion for the note is calculated as the lowest of the
10 trading closing prices immediately preceding such conversion, discounted by 32.5%. The balance of this note was $175,000
as of September 30, 2016. The beneficial conversion feature has a value of $212,500 at September 30, 2016.
On
June 15, 2016, the Company secured $105,500 from the sale of a convertible promissory note, which contained a $15,825
original issue discount, bringing the principal amount of the note to $121,325. The note bears interest at 12% per annum. The
note matures on June 15, 2017. The holder has the option to convert any balance of principal into common stock of the Company
after the initial 180 days. The rate of conversion for this note is calculated as the average of the three lowest closing
prices of the Company’s common stock during the 20 trading days immediately preceding such conversion, discounted by
50%. The outstanding balance of this note was $76,132 as of September 30, 2016. The beneficial conversion feature has a value
of $154,755 at September 30, 2016.
On
September 23, 2016, the Company secured $55,500 from the sale of a convertible promissory note, which contained an
$8,325 original issue discount, bringing the principal amount of the note to $63,825. The note bears interest at 12% per
annum. The note matures on September 23, 2017. The holder has the option to convert any balance of principal into common
stock of the Company after the initial 180 days. The rate of conversion for this note is calculated as the average of the
three lowest closing prices of the Company’s common stock during the 20 trading days immediately preceding such
conversion, discounted by 50%. The outstanding balance of this note was $49,119 as of September 30, 2016. The beneficial
conversion feature has a value of $106,250 at September 30, 2016.
Due
to the variable conversion price associated with these convertible promissory notes, the Company has determined that the conversion
feature is considered a derivative liability. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company
record the fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the Convertible Promissory Note and to adjust the fair value
as of each subsequent balance sheet date.
The
initial fair values of the embedded debt derivatives of $500,842, $227,746, $322,660 and $108,458 were charged to current period
operations as interest expenses. The fair value of the described embedded derivative was determined using the Black-Scholes Model
with the following assumptions:
(1) risk free interest
rate of
|
0.10% to 0.45%
|
(2) dividend yield of
|
0%;
|
(3) volatility factor of
|
248% to 435%;
|
(4) an expected life of the conversion
feature of
|
365 days; and
|
(5) estimated fair value of the Company’s
common stock of
|
$0.006 to $0.008 per share.
|
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a loss in fair value of derivative of $136,960.
The
following table represents the Company’s derivative liability activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016:
Balance
at December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
824,468
|
|
Initial
measurement at issuance date of the notes
|
|
|
431,118
|
|
Initial
measurement due to insufficient shares available for issuance
|
|
|
—
|
|
Change
in derivative liability during the nine months ended September 30, 2016
|
|
|
(294,158
|
)
|
Balance
September 30, 2016
|
|
$
|
961,428
|
|
NOTE 4
|
Derivative
financial instruments
|
The
following table presents the components of the Company’s derivative financial instruments associated with convertible
promissory notes (See Note 3) which have no observable market data and are derived using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model measured at fair value on a recurring basis, using Level 1 and 3 inputs to the fair value hierarchy, at September 30,
2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Embedded
conversion features
|
|
$
|
961,428
|
|
|
$
|
824,468
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Insufficient
shares
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Derivative
financial instruments
|
|
$
|
961,428
|
|
|
$
|
824,468
|
|
These derivative financial instruments arise as a result of applying
ASC 815 Derivative and Hedging
(“
ASC 815
”),
which requires the Company to make a determination whether an equity-linked financial instrument, or embedded feature, is indexed
to the entity’s own stock. This guidance applies to any freestanding financial instrument or embedded features that have
the characteristics of a derivative, and to any freestanding financial instruments that are potentially settled in an entity’s
own stock.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company had outstanding notes with embedded conversion features and the Company
did not, at this date, have a sufficient number of authorized and available shares of common stock to settle the outstanding contracts
which triggered the requirement to account for these instruments as derivative financial instruments until such time as the Company
has sufficient authorized shares.
Laguna
Beach Office
The
Company is obligated under a commercial real estate lease agreement with World Properties, L.P. The lease is for a term of 60
months which began February 1, 2016 and expires January 31, 2021. The lease calls for current monthly rental payments of $3,438.
Dallas
Office
The
Company is obligated under a commercial real estate sublease agreement with Granite One West, Ltd. The sublease is for a term
of seven months which began on August 1, 2016 and expires on February 28, 2017. The lease calls for current monthly rental payments
of $2,200.
Rental
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was $35,337 and $9,500, respectively. Future minimum rental payments
for the remaining terms are as follows:
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
2016 (three months)
|
|
$
|
16,914
|
|
2017
|
|
|
45,656
|
|
2018
|
|
|
41,256
|
|
2019
|
|
|
41,256
|
|
2020
|
|
|
41,256
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,438
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
189,776
|
|
NOTE 6
|
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
On
January 10, 2016, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to its President and CEO, George J.
Powell, III as a bonus in consideration for his efforts throughout the 2015 fiscal year. The shares had a fair market value
of $30,000, $0.003 per share.
On
January 10, 2016, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to its then newly appointed Director and
COO, Thomas Witthuhn, as a signing bonus for his appointment to the Company’s Board of Directors. The shares had a fair
market value of $30,000, $0.003 per share.
On
January 10, 2016, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to Anubis Capital Partners as a bonus and
in consideration for strategic advisory services rendered throughout the 2015 fiscal year. The shares had a fair market value
of $15,000, $0.003 per share.
On
June 15, 2016, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to an unrelated party as partial payment of
the Asset Purchase Agreement, see Note 6. The shares had a fair market value of $30,000, $0.006 per share.
During
June 2016, the Company issued 7,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to unrelated parties pursuant to employment services,
see Note 7. The shares had a fair market value of $42,000, $0.006 per share.
Series
A Preferred Stock
On
May 22, 2015, the Company designated a series of Series A Preferred Stock. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are not
be entitled to receive dividends paid on the Company’s common stock. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are not
entitled to any liquidation preferences. The shares of the Series A Preferred Stock have no conversion rights. The Series A Preferred
Stock provide the holder thereof the power to vote on all shareholder matters (including, but not limited to at every meeting
of the stockholders of the Company and upon any action taken by stockholders of the Company with or without a meeting) equal to
fifty-one percent (51%) of the total vote. Following the third anniversary of the original issuance of the Series A Preferred
Stock, the Company has the option with (a) the unanimous consent or approval of all members of the Board of Directors of the Company;
(b) the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock; and (c) the approval of any
interest or option holder(s) of such Series A Preferred Stock, to redeem any and all outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred
Stock by paying the holders a redemption price of $100 per share.
Series
B Preferred Stock
On
December 7, 2015, the Company designated a series of Series B Preferred Stock. The Series B Preferred Stock have an original issue
price and liquidation preference (pro rata with the common stock) of $10.00 per share. The Series B Preferred Stock provides the
holders thereof the right to convert such shares of Series B Preferred Stock into common stock on a 100-for-one basis, provided
that no conversion can result in the conversion of more than that number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock, if any, such that,
upon such conversion, the aggregate beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock of any such holder and all persons
affiliated with any such holder as described in Rule 13d-3 is more than 4.99% of the Company’s common stock then outstanding
(the “Maximum Percentage”). For so long as any shares of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock remain issued and
outstanding, the holders thereof are entitled to vote that number of votes as equals the number of shares of common stock into
which such holder’s aggregate shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are convertible, subject to the Maximum Percentage.
On
December 7, 2015, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange”) with its shareholder, Dr. Eric H.
Scheffey, whereby Dr. Scheffey exchanged forty million (40,000,000) shares of the Company’s restricted common stock for
40,000 shares of the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock.
On
January 4, 2016, the Company issued 25,000 shares of its restricted Series B Preferred Stock to Dr. Scheffey in connection
with the Subscription Agreement as dated December 7, 2015 (the January 1, 2016 payment) and received $250,000. The intrinsic
value, the difference between the subscription price and the underlying price of the common stock on the date of the
subscription agreement, has been valued at $250,000. Accordingly, this discount attributable to beneficial conversion
privilege of preferred stock has been recorded as a dividend in the current period and an increase in additional paid-in
capital.
The
accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern,
which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company
has had only limited revenues since inception. Since inception, it has incurred significant losses to date, and as of
September 30, 2016, has a working capital deficit of approximately $1,800,000 and has an accumulated deficit of
approximately $12,800,000. The Company’s ability to continue its operations is uncertain and is dependent upon its
ability to implement a business plan sufficient to generate a positive cash flow and/or raise capital to fund its operations.
These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities that
might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue operations in the normal course of business.
NOTE 8
|
ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
|
Effective
on June 23, 2016, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with 10Star LLC (“
10Star
” and the “
Purchase
Agreement
”), pursuant to which, the Company purchased certain contracts, relating to 10Star’s “
On the
Border
” and “
7-Eleven
” accounts (the “
Purchased Accounts
”).
The
purchase price paid for the Assets at closing on June 23, 2016, was (a) $50,000 in cash; (b) 5 million shares of restricted
common stock; and (c) an unsecured promissory note in the amount of $200,000 (the “
Promissory Note
”). The
total purchase price of $280,000 is presented on the current balance sheet as “Purchased contract” as of
September 30, 2016, net of $30,000 of accumulated amortization.
The
parties agreed to certain post-closing requirements in connection with the Acquisition. We agreed that Chase Daniel, the
Chief Executive Officer and majority owner of 10Star, would be invited to serve as a member of the Company’s Board of
Directors, subject to the Board of Directors confirming his qualifications, for a period of not less than one (1) year from
the closing, which appointment was effective on June 23, 2016. The Company agreed to provide Mr. Daniel, upon payment in full
of the Promissory Note, a commission equal to 3% of all net sales (gross sales generated by us, less (i) returns,
(ii) discounts, (iii) adjustments, and (iv) allowances) shipped by us (and paid for by customers), relating to the
Purchased Accounts, payable monthly in arrears. The Company agreed to keep complete and accurate books and records showing
all net sales with respect to the Purchased Accounts and to allow Mr. Daniel audit and inspection rights in connection
therewith. In the event any audit reveals a shortfall, we are required to immediately pay such shortfall, with any amount not
immediately paid accruing interest at the rate of 15% per annum until paid, and we are required to reimburse Mr. Daniel for
the cost of such audit in the event any shortfall is greater than 5% of the amount of commissions paid in the prior 12
months.
Amounts
due under the Promissory Note accrue interest at the rate of 10% per annum (12% upon the occurrence of an event of default),
with all interest payable on the maturity date of the Promissory Note, June 23, 2018, provided that the amounts owed under
the Promissory Note can be pre-paid in whole or part at any time prior to maturity. Until the earlier of (a) the maturity
date of the Promissory Note; and (b) the date the Promissory Note is paid in full, the Company is required to pay 10Star
fifty percent (50%) of the Gross Profits generated by the Company in connection with the Purchased Accounts.
NOTE 9
|
EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENTS
|
In
connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into executive employment agreements with Aaron Luna and
William Joseph (J.B.) Hill, to serve as Executive Vice Presidents of the Company in May 2016, in anticipation of
the Acquisition.
The
employment agreements with Aaron Luna and William Joseph (J.B.) Hill, as Executive Vice Presidents of the Company, entered into
with such executives at closing, each have substantially similar terms, including an effective date of April 1, 2016, an initial
term of one year (automatically renewable thereafter for additional one year terms in the event neither party provides the other
notice of non-renewal at least 30 days prior to the end of the then term). Both agreements include a base salary as determined
by the Board of Directors in its sole and absolute discretion in addition to an equity consideration of 3.75 million restricted
shares of common stock to Mr. Luna and 3.25 million restricted shares of common stock to Mr. Hill (the “
Restricted Shares
”),
which Restricted Shares are subject to forfeiture and cancellation until March 31, 2017, pursuant to Restricted Stock Award Agreements,
which provide that if the executive’s employment is terminated due to death, the end of the term of the employment agreement,
for cause, or by the executive for any reason other than good reason (as defined in the agreements), the vesting of the Restricted
Shares ceases on the date of termination and any unvested Restricted Shares are forfeited, provided that if the executive’s
employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive for good reason, any Restricted Shares that are scheduled to
vest during the period through the end of the initial term or the then current extension term, if any, vest immediately. In addition
to the base salary described above, the executives receive a commission on our net sales (gross sales less (i) returns, (ii) discounts,
(iii) adjustments, (iv) allowances, and (v) any and all payments made to 10Star in accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement)(“
Net
Sales
”), to accounts other than the Purchased Accounts, determined on a case-by-case basis in the reasonable discretion
of the Company; and a commission equal to 1.50% of all Net Sales shipped by us (and paid by customers), for the Purchased Accounts,
due monthly in arrears.