Note 1 - Organization and Nature of Operations
Arête Industries, Inc. ("Arête" or the "Company"), is a Colorado corporation that was incorporated on July 21, 1987. The Company seeks to focus on acquiring interests in traditional oil and gas ventures, and seek properties that offer profit potential from overlooked and by-passed reserves of oil and natural gas, which may include shut-in wells, in-field development, stripper wells, re-completion and re-working projects. In addition, the Company's strategy includes purchase and sale of acreage prospective for oil and natural gas and seeking to obtain cash flow from the sale and farm out of such prospects.
Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of presentation
These statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP") for interim financial information. They do not include all information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. However, except as disclosed herein, there has been no material change in the information disclosed in the notes to financial statements included in Arête's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the SEC. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position as of March 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015, and the results of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the quarters ended March, 31, 2016, and 2015. Operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year. The Company's 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K includes certain definitions and a summary of significant accounting policies and should be read in conjunction with this Form 10-Q.
In connection with the preparation of its unaudited condensed financial statements, the Company evaluated events subsequent to the balance sheet date of March 31, 2016, through the filing date of this report.
Liquidity and Management's Plans
The Company has reported net operating losses during the three months ended March 31, 2016, and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. The Company also has negative working capital at March 31, 2016, and is currently in default with two of its creditors for which it has notes payable. This recent history of operating losses, negative working capital and defaults, along with the recent decrease in commodity prices, may adversely affect the Company's ability to access the capital it needs to continue operations on terms acceptable to the Company when such capital is needed. However, due to the Company's capital raise through the use of it's Series A2 Preferred Stock (Note 6 - Stock transactions and preferred stock dividends), its entry into an extension of some of its key notes payable to long-term debt (Note 7 - Notes and advances payable) and the acquisition of additional producing wells and properties at the end of fiscal year 2015, the Company believes that it has sufficient ability to raise additional capital to fund its current operations over, at least, 12 months from the report date of this filing and therefore, that it has mitigated substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Still, the Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish its business plan and continue to secure other sources of financing and attain continuously profitable operations. The Company continues to pursue additional sources of financing but there can be no assurance that such financing will be completed on terms favorable to the Company, if at all.
Use of estimates
Preparation of the Company's financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make various assumptions, judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Changes in these assumptions, judgments and estimates will occur as a result of the passage of time and the occurrence of future events and, accordingly, actual results could differ from amounts initially established.
The most significant areas requiring the use of assumptions, judgments and estimates relate to the volumes of natural gas and oil reserves used in calculating depreciation, depletion and amortization ("DD&A"), the amount of expected future cash flows used in determining possible impairments of oil and gas properties and the amount of future capital costs used in these calculations. Assumptions, judgments and estimates also are required in determining future asset retirement obligations and impairments of undeveloped properties.
Oil and Gas producing activities
The Company's oil and gas exploration and production activities are accounted for using the successful efforts method. Under this method, all property acquisition costs and costs of exploratory and development wells are capitalized when incurred, pending determination of whether the well has proved reserves. If an exploratory well does not result in proved reserves, the costs of drilling the well are charged to expense and included within cash flows from investing activities in the Statements of Cash Flows. The costs of development wells are capitalized whether productive or nonproductive. Oil and gas lease acquisition costs are also capitalized.
Other exploration costs, including certain geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals for oil and gas leases, are charged to expense as incurred. The sale of a partial interest in a proved property is accounted for as a cost recovery and no gain or loss is recognized as long as this treatment does not significantly affect the unit-of-production DD&A rate. A gain or loss is recognized for all other sales of proved properties and is classified in other operating revenues. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and renewals and betterments are capitalized to the appropriate property and equipment accounts.
The Company estimates the expected undiscounted future cash flows of its oil and gas properties and compares such undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to determine if the carrying amount is recoverable. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, the Company will adjust the carrying amount of the oil and gas properties to fair value. The factors used to determine fair value include, but are not limited to, recent sales prices of comparable properties, the present value of estimated future cash flows, net of estimated operating and development costs using estimates of reserves, future commodity pricing, future production estimates, anticipated capital expenditures and various discount rates commensurate with the risk and current market conditions associated with realizing the expected cash flows projected. Once incurred, a write-down may not be reversed in a later period. For the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded impairment expense of $252,000 and $0, respectively, against its oil and gas properties.
The provision for DD&A of oil and gas properties is calculated based on proved reserves on a field-by-field basis using the unit-of-production method. Natural gas is converted to barrel equivalents, BOE, at the rate of six Mcf of natural gas to one barrel of oil. Estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, which are net of estimated salvage values, are taken into consideration.
Unproved oil and gas properties are periodically assessed for impairment on a project-by-project basis. These impairment assessments are affected by the results of exploration activities, commodity price outlooks, planned future sales or expirations of all or a portion of such projects. If the estimated future net cash flows attributable to such projects are not expected to be sufficient to fully recover the costs invested in each project, the Company will recognize an impairment loss at that time. There was no provision for impairment recorded against its unproved property at March 31, 2016 and 2015.
Revenue recognition
The Company records revenues from the sale of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids ("NGL") when delivery to the purchaser has occurred and title has transferred. The Company uses the sales method to account for gas imbalances. Under this method, revenue is recorded on the basis of gas actually sold by the Company. In addition, the Company will record revenue for its share of gas sold by other owners that cannot be volumetrically balanced in the future due to insufficient remaining reserves. The Company also reduces revenue for other owners' gas sold by the Company that cannot be volumetrically balanced in the future due to insufficient remaining reserves. The Company's remaining over and under produced gas balancing positions are considered in the Company's proved oil and gas reserves. Gas imbalances at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were not material.
Earnings per share
Basic net income (loss) per share of common stock is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and other dilutive securities. The only potentially dilutive securities for the diluted earnings per share calculations consist of Series A2 preferred stock that is convertible into common stock at an exchange price of $2.00 per common share. As of March 31, 2016, the convertible preferred stock had an aggregate liquidation preference of $2,720,000 and was convertible to 1,360,000 shares of common stock. These shares were excluded from the earnings per share calculation because they would be anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
Three month period ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholder's – Basic
|
|
$
|
(688,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
(304,510
|
)
|
Plus: Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net loss available to common shareholder's – Diluted
|
|
$
|
(688,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
(304,510
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic
|
|
|
14,295,400
|
|
|
|
12,810,000
|
|
Add: Dilutive effect of stock options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Add: Dilutive effect of preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted
|
|
|
14,295,400
|
|
|
|
12,810,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
New accounting pronouncements
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." ASU 2016-01 changes certain guidance related to the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted for the majority of the update, but is permitted for two of its provisions. The Company is evaluating the new guidance and has not determined the impact this standard may have on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases." ASU 2016-02 requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases currently classified as operating leases and makes certain changes to the way lease expenses are accounted for. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and for interim periods beginning the following year. This update should be applied using a modified retrospective approach, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the new guidance and has not determined the impact this standard may have on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). This ASU amends the principal versus agent guidance in ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which was issued in May 2014 ("ASU 2014-09"). Further, in April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. This ASU also amends ASU 2014-09 and is related to the identification of performance obligations and accounting for licenses. The effective date and transition requirements for both of these amendments to ASU 2014-09 are the same as those of ASU 2014-09, which was deferred for one year by ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date. That is, the guidance under these standards is to be applied using a full retrospective method or a modified retrospective method, as outlined in the guidance, and is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted only for annual periods, and interim period within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this standard and assessing its impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In August 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments." ASU 2016-15 provides cash flow statement guidance for debt payments or debt Extinguishment costs, settlement of Zero-Coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of Corporate-Owned Life Insurance Policies, including Bank-Owned Life Insurance Policies, distributions received from equity method investees, beneficial interests in securitization transactions and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. This update is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this standard and assessing its impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
Note 3 - Oil and Gas Properties
The following table sets forth information concerning the Company's oil and gas properties:
|
|
March 31,
2016
|
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties at cost, net of impairment
|
|
$
|
8,431,283
|
|
|
$
|
8,683,273
|
|
Unproved oil and gas properties at cost, net of impairment
|
|
|
154,972
|
|
|
|
154,836
|
|
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(3,378,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,223,000
|
)
|
Oil and gas properties, net
|
|
$
|
5,208,255
|
|
|
$
|
5,615,109
|
|
During the three month period ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded depletion expense of $155,000 and $202,225, respectively. The Company recorded impairment expense of $252,000 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Acquisitions
In 2011, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement ("DNR and Tindall PSA") and other related agreements and documents with Tucker Family Investments, LLLP, which is refered to as "Tucker"; DNR Oil & Gas, Inc. which is refered to as "DNR"; and Tindall Operating Company, which is refered to as "Tindall", and collectively are refered to as the "Sellers", for the purchase of certain oil and gas operating properties in Colorado, Kansas, Wyoming, and Montana. DNR is owned primarily by an officer and director of the Company, Charles B. Davis, and he is an affiliate of Tucker and Tindall. The consideration for the purchase was determined by bargaining between management of the Company and Mr. Davis, and the Company used reports of independent engineering firms to analyze the purchase price. The base purchase price was paid in full on September 29, 2011.
On January 19, 2016, but effective December 31, 2015, (the "Effective Date") the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with Tucker, DNR and Tindall regarding the DNR and Tindall PSA and other related matters. In consideration of the amounts indicated below, the parties (i) terminated Exhibits C and C-2 to the DNR and Tindall PSA for all purposes; (ii) extinguished all liabilities of the Company under Exhibit C of the DNR and Tindall PSA including $250,000 related to the increase in oil prices after the acquisition; (iii) agreed that the promissory note of $792,151 due to DNR (See Note 7 – Notes and Advances Payable) and accrued interest thereon was paid in full; and (iv) released each other against any and all claims which have been raised or could have been raised among them. Specifically, Exhibits C and C-2 to the DNR and Tindall PSA related to potential payments that would have needed to have been made by the Company in the event oil prices increased to certain levels and related to certain payments to have been made by the Company in the event it sold certain properties purchased under the DNR and Tindall PSA. Exhibits C and C-2 were terminated and extinguished (including any amounts owed thereunder including an alleged amount of $250,000 under Exhibit C to the DNR and Tindall PSA) in exchange for 25 fully paid nonassessable restricted shares of our 7% Series A2 Convertible Preferred Stock. Consideration to pay the above promissory note in full consisted of the issuance to DNR of 65 fully paid, nonassessable restricted shares of its 7% Series A2 Convertible Preferred Stock, and paying DNR $303,329 in cash, which was paid during the three month period ended March 31, 2016. A description of the terms of the 7% Series A2 Convertible Preferred Stock, including its terms of conversion into shares of the Company's common stock is set forth below in Note 6 - Stock transactions and preferred stock dividends. The Company recorded an expense of $141,099 included in other operating expense in the statement of operations at December 31, 2015, as a result of this transaction. At March 31, 2016, the Company's only remaining liabilities to DNR are related to oil and gas operations and are in Accounts payable – DNR Oil & Gas, Inc. on the balance sheet.
On December 30, 2015, the Company completed an asset acquisition pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement executed on November 25, 2015, but effective December 1, 2015 (the "Wellstar Purchase and Sale Agreement ") with Wellstar Corporation (the "Seller"), an unaffiliated corporation. The assets acquired were producing oil and gas leases in Sumner County, Kansas and Kimball County, Nebraska (collectively, the "Properties" and individually, the "Padgett Properties" and the "Nebraska Properties"). The Company acquired 51% of Seller's interest (ranging from 47% to 100% of the working interests) in the Padgett Properties and acquired 100% of the Seller's interest (100% of the working interests) in the Nebraska Properties for aggregate consideration of $1,100,000 and the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of the Company's restricted common stock valued at $0.10 per share at the date of closing, or $100,000.
Note 4 – Fair Value Measurements
FASB ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures", establishes a framework for measuring fair value. That framework provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB ASC 820 are described as follows:
|
-
|
Level 1 – Observable inputs, such as unadjusted quoted prices in active markets, for substantially identical assets and liabilities.
|
|
-
|
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 for similar assets and liabilities. These include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. If the asset or liability has a specified or contractual term, the input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
|
|
-
|
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, generally requiring a significant amount of judgment by management. The assets or liabilities fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
|
The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Further, although the Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.
Upon completion of wells, the Company records an asset retirement obligation at fair value using Level 3 assumptions.
Nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis upon impairment. The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the Company's assets and liabilities at fair value:
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
5,053,283
|
|
The Following table sets forth a reconciliation of the change in fair value of the Company's proved oil and gas properties from December 31, 2015 to March 31, 2016:
Balance December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
5,460,273
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
10
|
|
DD&A expense
|
|
|
(155,000
|
)
|
Balance at March 31, 2016, prior to impairment
|
|
|
5,305,283
|
|
Pre-tax non-cash impairment
|
|
|
(252,000
|
)
|
Balance March 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
5,053,283
|
|
The carrying amounts of other financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, account payables, accrued liabilities and long term debt in our balance sheet approximates fair value as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Note 5 - Income taxes
The book to tax temporary differences resulting in deferred tax assets and liabilities are primarily net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $8.3 million which expire in 2018 through 2035. A 100% valuation allowance has been established against the deferred tax assets, as utilization of the loss carry forwards and realization of other deferred tax assets cannot be reasonably assured. For the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Company did not recognize any income tax benefit due to the valuation allowance.
The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, based upon the technical merits of the position. As of March 31, 2016, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits.
Note 6 - Stock transactions and preferred stock dividends
Common stock
There were no shares of common stock issued during the three month period ended March 31, 2016.
Preferred stock
On December 11, 2015, the Company began a private placement of its Series A2 7% Preferred Convertible Stock with a maximum amount of 600 shares at $10,000 per share or $6,000,000. At March 31, 2016, the Company had sold subscriptions equal to $1,820,000 (182 shares) and issued to DNR 90 shares fully paid ($900,000), nonassessable restricted shares of its 7% Series A2 Convertible Preferred Stock as part of the consideration for a settlement agreement entered into with DNR.
Note 7 - Notes and advances payable
Notes payable consist of the following as of the date indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Officers, directors and affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, interest 7.0%, due January 2019 (1)
|
|
|
40,498
|
|
|
|
43,803
|
|
Collateralized note payable (2)
|
|
|
120,728
|
|
|
|
120,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total officers, directors and affiliates
|
|
|
161,226
|
|
|
|
164,531
|
|
Less: Current portion of officers, directors, and affiliates
|
|
|
134,116
|
|
|
|
13,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of officers, directors, and affiliates
|
|
$
|
27,110
|
|
|
$
|
151,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrelated parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, interest at 7.5%, due April 2016 (3)
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Note payable, due March 2017 (4)
|
|
|
167,348
|
|
|
|
169,660
|
|
Note payable, interest variable (see below) due June 28, 2018 (5)
|
|
|
591,995
|
|
|
|
616,105
|
|
Note payable, interest at 7.0%, due August 2016 (6)
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
Notes payable, interest at 7.0%, due January 2017 (7)
|
|
|
30,141
|
|
|
|
32,606
|
|
Notes payable, interest at 7.0%, due January 2016, Extended to May 2016 (8)
|
|
|
183,000
|
|
|
|
183,000
|
|
Notes payable, interest at 4.957%, due October 2017 (9)
|
|
|
22,253
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrelated parties
|
|
|
1,156,737
|
|
|
|
1,163,371
|
|
Less: Current portion of unrelated parties
|
|
|
349,956
|
|
|
|
989,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of unrelated parties
|
|
$
|
806,781
|
|
|
$
|
173,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
On January 1, 2014, we memorialized certain short-term liabilities with one of our directors, Charlie Davis, into a formal promissory note. This not accrues interest at a rate of 7.0% with monthly payments equal to $1,316 (principal and interest) and will mature on January 1, 2019.
|
|
(2)
|
On April 29, 2013, the Company executed a promissory note under which the Company agreed to pay Apex Financial Services Corp, a Colorado corporation, ("Apex") the principal sum of $1,000,000, with interest accruing at an annual rate of 7.5%, with principal and interest due on May 31, 2014, and subsequently extended to March 31, 2017. The Company also agreed to assign 75% of its operating income from its oil and gas operations and any lease or well sale or any other asset sales to Apex to secure the debt. Apex is 100% owned by the CEO, director, and shareholder of the Company, Nicholas L. Scheidt. The Company borrowed the full amount of principal on the note, and also paid a loan fee of $10,000. In the event of default on the note and failure to cure the default in ten days, Apex may accelerate payment and the annual interest rate on the note will accrue at 18%. Default includes failure to pay the note when due or if the Company borrows any other monies or offers security in the Company or in the collateral securing the note prior to the note being paid in full.
|
|
(3)
|
On March 28, 2012, the Company executed a promissory note with Pikerni, LLC ("Pikerni"). This note was extended and amended on April 1, 2015. The note accrues interest at 7.5% and is payable quarterly. The maturity date of the note is April 1, 2016, with principal payments of $5,000 due on June 30, 2015, September 30, 2015, December 31, 2015, and March 31, 2016, and the remaining principal balance of $80,000 due on April 1, 2016. At March 31, 2016, the Company was in default on this note. The Company is currently negotiating an amendment with Pikerni to cure the default.
|
|
(4)
|
On March 28, 2012, the Company executed a Promissory Note with Fairfield Management Group, LLC, subsequently assigned to Donald Prosser (former CFO and Director) ("Prosser") during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. The note has a principal balance of $150,000, accrues interest at 7.5% payable monthly and has a maturity date of March 31, 2016, which was subsequently extended to March 31, 2017.
|
On December 31, 2013, the Company executed a promissory note with Prosser for $28,500. This note accrues interest at a rate of 7.0% with monthly payments equal to $564 (principal and interest) and matures on January 1, 2019.
|
(5)
|
On January 28, 2014, we entered into a line of credit loan agreement for $1,500,000 due January 15, 2015, subsequently extended to June 28, 2018. The terms of the note are as follows: 1) the accrued interest is payable monthly starting February 28, 2014, 2) the interest rate is variable based on an index calculated based on a prime rate as published by the Wall Street Journal index (currently 3.5%) plus an add on index with the current and minimum rate of 6.5%, the note has draw provisions and is collateralized by the wells and leases owned by the Company, a certificate of deposit for $500,000 at CityWide Banks pledged by a related party, and 5) the personal guarantee of Nicholas Scheidt, Chief Executive Officer. The amount eligible for borrowing on the Credit Facility is limited to the lesser of (i) 65% of the Company's PV10 value of its carbon reserves based upon the most current engineering reserve report or (ii) 48 month cumulative cash flow based upon the most current engineering reserve report. In addition to the borrowing base limitation, the Company is required to maintain and meet certain affirmative and negative covenants and conditions in order to draw advances on the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility contains certain representations, warranties, and affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the Company, which are customarily applicable to senior secured loan facilities. Key covenants include limitations on indebtedness, restricted payments, creation of liens on oil and gas properties, hedging transactions, mergers and consolidations, sales of assets, use of loan proceeds, change in business, and change in control. At March 31, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants. The above-referenced promissory note contains customary default and acceleration provisions and provides for a default interest rate of 21% per annum. In addition, the Credit Facility contains customary events of default, including: (a) failure to pay any obligations when due; (b) failure to comply with certain restrictive covenants; (c) false or misleading representations or warranties; (d) defaults of other indebtedness; (e) specified events of bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings; (f) one or more final, non-appealable judgments in excess of $50,000 that is not covered by insurance; (g) change in control (25% threshold); (h) negative events affecting the Guarantor; and (i) lender in good faith believes itself insecure. In an event of default arising from the specified events, the Credit Facility provides that the commitments thereunder will terminate and the Lender may take such other actions as permitted including, declaring any principal and accrued interest owed on the line of credit to become immediately due and payable. The Credit Facility is secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Company, pursuant to a Security Agreement, Deed of Trust and Assignment of As-Extracted Collateral entered into between the Company and Citywide Banks
|
|
(6)
|
On August 15, 2014, the Company redeemed the remaining 10 shares of Series A-1 Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding for consideration of $77,500, of which $15,500 was paid in cash and the remaining amount as a promissory note for $62,000. The note accrues interest at 7% per annum, payable in two installments as follows;
|
|
a.
|
A payment of $31,000, plus accrued and unpaid interest was payable on August 15, 2015
|
|
b.
|
A payment of $31,000, plus accrued and unpaid interest shall be payable on August 15, 2016
|
The Company did not make the August 15, 2015 principal payment and is currently in default on this note. The Company is negotiating new terms with the note holder.
|
(7)
|
On December 31, 2013, the Company executed a promissory note with Pikerni for $49,500. This note accrues interest at a rate of 7.0% with monthly payments equal to $980 (principal and interest) and matures on January 1, 2019.
|
|
(8)
|
In June 2013, in connection with the conversions of Series A-1 Preferred Stock by Burlingame Equity Investors II, LP and Burlingame Equity Investors Master Fund, LP, the Company issued unsecured promissory notes in the original principal amounts of $48,000 and $552,000, respectively, with interest at 7% per annum payable quarterly and all unpaid interest and principal due on July 23, 2014. We have agreed with the holders of these two existing notes to extend the maturity date of the notes to June 18, 2018.
|
|
(9)
|
On March 1, 2016, the Company executed a Commercial Premium Finance Agreement – Promissory Note in the amount of $25,976 to finance one of its insurance policies. This note accrues interest at a rate of 4.957% and matures on October 17, 2016 with monthly payments equal to $3,247 (principal and interest).
|
Note 8 - Asset retirement obligations
A reconciliation of the Company's asset retirement obligations ("ARO") at March 31, 2016, is as follows:
Balance, December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
995,197
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
23,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2016
|
|
|
1,018,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
(419,094
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term asset retirement obligations
|
|
$
|
599,645
|
|
Note 9 - Subsequent events
On September 29, 2016, a complaint was filed against the Company and two others in the Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, entitled Eric Langan, Paul McNulty, Patricia Quick, Stony Point Fund, L.P., and Jeffrey H. Wallen, D.D.S., P.C. vs. Arête Industries, Inc., Don Prosser, and Charles Davis. The complaint alleges that defendants Prosser and Davis made certain material representations to the plaintiffs in connection with the alleged purchase by the plaintiffs of $555,000 in common stock of the Company. The complaint alleges that the alleged misrepresentations were deliberate and requests damages against all of the defendants to compensate the plaintiffs for their alleged injuries resulting from the alleged misrepresentations, including punitive damages. The Company and the other defendants believe the action is entirely without merit and intend to vigorously defend the proceeding.