HNDI Handeni Gold Inc (CE)

The following discussion of our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations for the three months and the six months ended November 30, 2016 and 2015 should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes for the three months and six months ended November 30, 2016 and 2015 included herewith and our audited consolidated financial statements as at May 31, 2016 and 2015 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 as filed with the SEC. All financial information in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A” or the “discussion”) is expressed and prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. All dollar references are to the U.S. dollar, the Company’s reporting currency, unless otherwise noted. Some numbers in this MD&A have been rounded to the nearest thousand for discussion purposes.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This MD&A contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions with respect to the Company’s activities and future financial results, which are made based upon management’s current expectations and beliefs. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding the Company’s capital needs, business plans and expectations. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Management disclaims any obligation to publicly update these statements, or disclose any difference between its actual results and those reflected in these statements. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. Our principal area of focus is the Handeni Gold Project located in the Handeni district, within the Tanga region of the Republic of Tanzania in East Africa, in which we have interests in mineral claims through prospecting licenses (“PLs”) and/or primary mining licenses (“PMLs”) issued by the government of the Republic of Tanzania.

None of our mineral claims contain any substantiated mineral deposits, resources or reserves of minerals to date. Exploration has been carried out on these claims, in particular the eight PLs in the Handeni District. Accordingly, additional exploration of these mineral claims is required before any conclusion can be drawn as to whether any commercially viable mineral deposit may exist on any of our mineral claims. Our plan of operations is to continue exploration and drilling work when funds are available in order to ascertain whether our mineral claims warrant further advanced exploration to determine whether they possess commercially exploitable deposits of minerals. We will not be able to determine whether or not any of our mineral claims contain a commercially exploitable mineral deposit, resource or reserve, until appropriate exploratory work has been completed and an economic evaluation based on that work concludes economic viability.

We are considered an exploration or exploratory stage company, because we are involved in the examination and investigation of land that we believe may contain valuable minerals, for the purpose of discovering the presence of ore, if any, and its extent. There is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on the properties underlying our mineral claim interests, and considerable further exploration will be required before a final evaluation as to the economic and legal feasibility for our future exploration is determined.

Illegal artisanal activity on the Company’s license areas is a continuous and remaining concern to the company’s interests in the Handeni district. During the past 2 years illegal artisanal activities on our properties seriously interfered with the company’s exploration programs as outlined in our quarterly reports. The Company has and is addressing this issue with responsible local, regional and central government authorities on a continuous basis. The Company was given assurances by the Ministry of Energy and Minerals (the “MEM”) that illegal artisanal miners would be removed from our target areas, including Mjembe and Target 5 following an agreed date of November 24, 2015, then postponed to April 2, 2016.In June 2016, illegal miners were removed by governmental authorities and the police force from two of our target areas namely Ngwila and Mjembe. The Company is establishing a base camp on the Mjembe site to continue with exploration and to secure the site from interference by illegal artisanal miners. Although the Company is relieved that the Tanzanian government acted to protect our legal interests, we are of the opinion that much more needed to be done to address the illegal artisanal problem with the aim of having a long term solution. The Company will continue to follow all available legal structures to protect our exploration assets whilst at the same time work with authorities and artisanal miners to further the interest of both parties based on a secure legal framework. Not Handeni Gold Inc. or Tanzania as a country can afford the sterilization of its mining assets by unbridled illegal artisanal activity as it is currently conducted.

Our Mineral Claims

Handeni District Gold Project

Location and Access

The Handeni Gold properties lie within the historic Handeni artisanal gold mining district, located in Tanga Province, roughly 175 km northwest of Tanzania’s largest city, Dar Es Salaam, and 100 km southwest of the more northerly coastal city of Tanga (Fig. 1). The road from Dar Es Salaam to Tanga is paved; the secondary road that heads northwest from this road to the town of Handeni, a distance of 65 km, has recently been paved. The Handeni properties are located roughly 35 km south of the town of Handeni along a secondary gravel road. From this point, a number of dirt roads head south across various portions of the Handeni property and beyond. Driving time from Dar Es Salaam to the Handeni Gold properties is approximately five hours, depending on traffic and the weather.

14

Fig. 1: Location Map: Handeni Property in Tanzania.

Prospecting Licenses (PLs)

Currently, our primary focus is on the undivided 100% legal, beneficial and registerable interest in and to eight PLs, located in the Handeni District of Tanzania. The total area held by the Company in the Handeni district is now approximately 236.65 km ² (Fig. 2a, b) (Table 1).

Fig. 2(a). Outline of Handeni Gold PLs in the Handeni district (prior to 2016 reduction). An area containing 32 PMLs is represented in black.

Fig. 2(b). Outline of Handeni Gold PLs in the Handeni district (following 2016 reduction to date). See Fig. 2a for colour codes with license numbers.

15

Table 1: Status of Handeni Gold Prospecting Licenses.

During September, October and November of 2016, the company reduced the areas of 4 of our PL’s (namely PL6742/2010, PL6743/2010, PL6744/2010 and PL6779/2010) by approximately 50%. Combined with the additional 4 PL’s that we are holding (Table 1) the company is now prospecting an area of approximately 236,65km ² in the Hnadeni district.

To expand its operations to the Lake Victoria gold fields, the company applied for a prospecting license (PL11157/2016) bordering an active mining site with the ore zone potentially extending to the PL of interest. Due to the potential of illegal artisanal miners interfering with prospecting activities on this property, the company declined the offer for the license received from the Ministry of Energy and Minerals.

Primary Mining Licenses (PMLs)

On November 30, 2011, the Company acquired from Handeni Resources a 100% interest in primary mining licenses covering an area of approximately 2.67 square kilometers to the east of Magambazi Hill (Figs. 2 and 4). To comply with the laws and regulations of the Republic of Tanzania whereby foreign companies may not own PMLs, on July 19, 2012, the Company:

An enlargement of the “excluded area” as delineated on Fig. 2 is presented below (Fig. 3). An area within the outline of the 32 PML’s without a PML number (Fig. 3) has now been confirmed to be part of PL6743/2010. The block of 32 PMLs, shown in grey below, belongs to the Company as described above and are being explored.

Fig. 3: Exclusion areas within PL6743/2010. Note area in white within PML’s is part of PL6743/2010.

West of the western border of PL 6743/2010 are several more PMLs that do not belong to the Company. The area colored in green (Fig. 3) is a unitized block of four PMLs that were apparently acquired by Canaco Resources Inc. (“CRI”) (now East Africa Metals Inc.) from their owners.

16

Handeni District Project

We obtained a Technical Report on the Handeni Property (the “Handeni Report”), dated April 25, 2011, as prepared at our request by Avrom E. Howard, MSc, FGA, PGeol (Ontario), Principal Consultant at Nebu Consulting LLC. Mr. Howard is a Qualified Person in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 “Standards for Disclosure of Mineral Projects” and its Companion Policy (collectively, “NI 43-101”) and is a Practicing Professional Geologist registered with the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (registration number 0380).

Subsequent to the publishing of the April 25, 2011 NI 43-101 report by Mr. Howard, the Company produced numerous in-house technical reports and is in the process of compiling an updated NI 43-101 report that will include the updated model for mineralization on our Handeni property. The drilling conducted by the Company was done implementing and following Quality Control and Quality Assessment procedures recommended by SRK (Stephen, Robertson and Kirsten).

Property Description

General

Exploration, mining and related activities is regulated and controlled under the Mining Act of 1998 (revised in 2010) (the “Mining Act”).

Tanzania is Africa’s fourth leading gold producer, with several major companies producing and exploring for gold, mostly in northwestern Tanzania, south of Lake Victoria, in an area informally known as the Lake Victoria gold belt.

The Handeni Property

The increase in gold prices at the turn of the century and consequent increase in artisanal gold mining activity in the Handeni area led to the discovery of deposits of placer gold, in turn leading in 2003 to a classic gold rush. The discovery and mining of lode deposits followed, soon after, along with the growth of a shanty mining town at the northern base of Magambazi Hill.

Between 2005 and 2010, IPP Gold carried out exploration over its Prospecting Reconnaissance License leading to the upgrading of its holdings from one PLR to four PL’s of 800 km ² , in August 2010. Exploration work included airborne magnetic and radiometric surveys, ground magnetic surveys, reconnaissance geological mapping, soil sampling, pitting and trenching. It is these four PLs that were acquired by the Company from IPP Gold under the September 2010 agreement. Geological Setting Regional Geology Regional geological mapping programs led to the recognition of several major litho-structural provinces from Archean to recent age in Tanzania. The Archean craton covers most of the western two thirds of the country, roughly bounded to the east by the East African Rift. Archean rocks host all of the country’s kimberlite pipes and contained lode diamond deposits, and most of its lode gold deposits. The Archean basement terrain is bounded to the east and west by a series of Proterozoic mobile belts; this area, particularly that to the east, hosts most of the country’s wide variety of colored gemstone deposits. Some recent research suggests that portions of this assumed Proterozoic terrane may actually consist of Archean crust that has undergone a later phase of higher grade metamorphism.

The Handeni district forms part of the Tanzanian Mozambique belt. The belt was subjected to four tectonothermal events at 830-800Ma, ~760Ma, 630-580Ma and 560-520Ma. All except the last attained upper amphibolite / granulite grade metamorphic conditions.

Property Geology

The Handeni area is situated in the Palaeoproterozoic, Usugaran/Ubendian Metamorphic Terrane of Tanzania, along the northern extension of the north-trending Proterozoic Mozambique Mobile Belt.

The geology of the Handeni area comprises amphibolite to granulite facies metamorphic rocks interpreted to originally have formed a sequence of ultramafic to felsic volcanic flows, black shales and quartz-bearing sedimentary rocks. It is furthermore interpreted to comprise a metamorphosed/overprinted eastern extension/remnant of the Lake Victoria cratonic greenstone belt. High grade metamorphism has converted these original lithologies to a variety of metamorphic equivalents, including biotite-hornblende-garnet-pyroxene gneiss, migmatitic augen garnet- hornblende-pyroxene gneiss, quartzo-feldspathic hornblende-biotite-pyroxene gneiss, pyroxene-hornblende-biotite-garnet granulite and others.

Recent research by geologists from the University of Western Australia suggests that much of what has previously been considered to be of Proterozic age (Usagaran System) may in fact be overprinted Archean crust. This hypothesis has been invoked to help interpret the geology within which gold in this area is found and as the basis for an analogy between this gold mineralization and that found in less metamorphosed, bona fide Archean rocks in the Lake Victoria gold district, a few hundred km to the northwest. However, this is a hypothesis only, one that may be used for exploration modeling purposes but one that still requires more work.

Mineralization

The Handeni property is at an early stage of exploration. There are no known mineral resources or reserves on the Handeni property, nor are there any known economically mineable deposits on the property. Gold is found within garnet-amphibolite zones within biotite-feldspar gneiss at three k n o w n locations in the Company’s property, locations where historical lode gold occurrences have been documented. Gold occurs in quartz veins as well as within the garnet amphibolites adjacent to the quartz veins. Proof of this association is informally corroborated by the testimony of local, illegal artisanal miners, who recover gold both from quartz veins and gold-bearing gneiss that is not quartz vein bearing. Gold in the Company’s property has also been documented in soils and placers, at a variety of locations, as well.

17

Our geophysical and structural geological interpretation on which the drilling program conducted in 2012 was based, supported the mineralization model described above in broad terms.

Whereas gold was known in the Handeni area prior to the arrival in 2005 of the Company’s predecessor, IPP Gold, there is no history of any formal exploration in the area aside from limited work at Magambazi Hill itself and the work conducted in recent years by Canaco (East African Metals) in the region.

Handeni Gold’s intensive early exploration program following the Company’s September 2010 agreement with IPP achieved the following in terms of mineralization on the properties:

Exploration conducted during the past six months included:

The company is currently focusing exploration on its Mjembe target area (Target 7). Our evaluation of the Mjembe target areas is that gold is present in rocks formed during ductile, transitional and brittle deformation episodes – a classical example of mobilization and remobilization of gold over a long term period of geological deformation and metamorphism. Exploration on Target 7 (Mjembe) was highly successful and 3 potential drill sites have been delineated within the larger Mjembe target area. A limited grab sampling program was conducted on illegal artisanal sites within the Mjembe target. The results in these primary source rocks are highly encouraging with visible gold present in many of the samples. Twelve grab samples (12 kg each) on illegal artisanal mine dumps yielded gold values of between 2 and 7 grams per ton. These mine dumps are providing minimum values for gold as they represent an un-concentrated mixture of “ore zone”, hanging wall and foot wall material. HNDI is currently planning an exploration shaft to enable the company to gain a better understanding of the nature of the structural geology on the Mjembe-1 project as well as to conduct bulk sampling on the mineralization zone. Whole rock samples collected from a 60 m long and up to 10 m deep trench dug on our Mjembe-1 target yielded gold values of up to 6,1 g/t on specific horizons. The trench provided the necessary geological input to effectively determine the position of the exploration shaft.

18

Compliance with Government Regulation

We are subject to local laws and regulation governing the exploration, development, mining, production, importing and exporting of minerals; taxes; labor standards; occupational health; waste disposal; protection of the environment; mine safety; toxic substances; and other matters. We require licenses and permits to conduct exploration and mining operations. Amendments to current laws and regulations governing operations and activities of mining companies or more stringent implementation thereof could have a material adverse impact on our Company. Applicable laws and regulations will require us to make certain capital and operating expenditures to initiate new operations. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to close an operation once it is started until a particular problem is remedied or to undertake other remedial actions. This would have a material adverse effect on our results and financial condition.

Four of our mineral interests in Tanzania are currently held under PLs granted pursuant to the Mining Act for an initial period of three years and are renewable in two successive periods of two years only. The remaining four PL’s are being held under the 2010 Mining Act and are valid for an initial period of 4 years (the initial period expiring in 2018 (Table 2)). Following this the first renewal is for 3 years and the second renewal for 2 years, each renewal accompanied by a mandatory relinquishment of at least 50% of the license area. The application fees are $300 on initial application and $300 for each renewal. There is a preparation fee of $500 applicable on each license. The annual rent for the licenses are $100/km ² (initial period), $150/km ² (1 ^st renewal) and $200/km ² (2 ^nd renewal).

All PLs in Tanzania require the holder to employ and train local residents, typically amounting to $5,000 per year, and make exploration expenditures, as set out in the Mining Act. At each renewal, at least 50% of our licensed area must be relinquished. If we wish to keep the relinquished one-half portion, we must file a new application for the relinquished portion.

The geographical area covered by a PL may contain one or more previously granted PML’s. A PML is a mining license granted only to a Tanzanian citizen consisting of an area of not to exceed 10 hectares. Once a PL is granted, no additional PMLs can be granted within the geographical area covered by the PL. The PL is subject to the rights of previously granted and existing PMLs. The holder of a PL will have to work around the geographical area of the PML unless the PL holder acquires the PML and any rights to the land covered by the PML.

We must hold a mining license to carry out mining activities, which are granted only to the holder of a PL covering a particular area. A mining license is granted for a period of 25 years or the life of the mine. It is renewable after 10 years for a period not exceeding 15 years. Other than the PMLs being held under Handeni Resources, we do not hold any mining licenses, only PLs. An application for the 32 PMLs being held under agreement by Handeni Resources to be changed into a mining license (ML) is underway. Prospecting and mining license holders must submit regular reports in accordance with mining regulations. Upon commercial production, the government of Tanzania imposes a royalty on the gross value of all production at the rate of 3% of all gold produced. The applicable regulatory body in Tanzania is the Ministry of Energy and Minerals.

In July 1999, environmental management and protection regulations under the Mining Act came into force. An environmental impact statement and an environmental management plan must accompany special mining license, mining license and gemstone mining license applications for mineral rights. In addition to the establishment of environmental regulations, the Tanzanian government has improved management procedures for effective monitoring and enforcement of these regulations by strengthening the institutional capacity, especially in the field offices. The government has provided rules for the creation of reclamation funds to reinstate land to alternative uses after mining and it has developed guidelines for mining in restricted areas, such as forest reserves, national parks, near sources of water and other designated areas. These regulations have not had any material effect on our operations to date.

19

Competition

We operate in a highly competitive industry, competing with other mining and exploration companies, and institutional and individual investors, which are actively seeking minerals exploration properties throughout the world together with the equipment, labour and materials required to exploit such properties. Many of our competitors have financial resources, staff and facilities substantially greater than ours. The principal area of competition is encountered in the financial ability to cost effectively acquire prime minerals exploration prospects and then exploit such prospects. Competition for the acquisition of minerals exploration properties is intense, with many properties available in a competitive bidding process in which we may lack technological information or expertise available to other bidders. Therefore, we may not be successful in acquiring, exploring and developing profitable properties in the face of this competition. No assurance can be given that a sufficient number of suitable minerals exploration properties will be available for acquisition, exploration and development.

Employees

Other than our directors and executive officers, we had approximately three full-time equivalent employees and consultants located in Tanzania as of November 30, 2016. We also utilize independent geologists and consultants on a contract basis to conduct the work programs on our mineral properties in order to carry out our plan of operations.

Research and Development Expenditures

We have not incurred any research or development expenditures since our incorporation.

Subsidiaries

The Company has two subsidiaries, both of which are Tanzanian companies: (i) HG Limited (formerly DLM Tanzania Limited); and (ii) Douglas Lake Tanzania Limited, which is inactive.

Plan of Operations

Our plan of operations through our fiscal year ending May 31, 2017 is to continue to focus on the exploration of our Handeni mineral property in Tanzania, and the budget for this plan requires approximately $0.6 million for our plan of the exploration work, $100,000 for mineral licenses fees and a minimum of $0.5 million for our general and administration expenses, professional and consulting fees and other operating expenses.

Handeni Gold Inc. has clearly identifiable goals for its exploration program in Tanzania, which has been adapted to reflect recent changes in the situation on the ground and our exploration activities:

Other low cost exploration activities being conducted on a continuous basis on the Company’s Handeni licenses include:

The estimated budget for the completion of these exploration programs is provided below:

20

Our exploration efforts are severely restricted by a cash-flow problem as well as by the efforts to curb the activity of illegal artisanal mining activities. To this extent the company has only spent limited funding on exploration of our planned 2017 and 2016 operations. Solving the illegal artisanal mining situation on the Mjembe target has now enabled the company to focus our efforts on this target which is well defined and the target that will most likely yield further positive results with a relatively low input of cash.

For the six months ended November 30, 2016, the Company spent $285,000 in operations. At November 30, 2016, we had cash of $49,000 and a working capital deficit of $459,000. In addition, we have a total of $130,000 funds available to be withdrawn pursuant to a facility agreement with a related party. We assume $457,000 of payables due to related parties would not be demanded to pay in the fiscal year. As such, we estimated that we will still need a minimum of $787,000 additional funds in order to cover our planned operations over the fiscal year ending May 31, 2017. Our actual expenditures may exceed our estimations.

We anticipate that we will not generate any revenues for so long as we are an exploration stage company. Accordingly, we will be required to obtain additional financing in order to pursue our plan of operations.

We believe that external debt financing will not be an alternative for funding our next fiscal year exploration, as we do not have significant tangible assets to secure any debt financing. Therefore, we anticipate that additional funding will be in the form of further related parties debt financing and/or equity financing from the sale of our common stock. We cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to obtain sufficient financing to fund our acquisition and exploration program going forward. In the absence of sufficient funding, we will not be able to continue acquisition and exploration of mineral claims and we will be forced to abandon our mineral claims and our plan of operations. Even if we are successful in obtaining financing to fund our acquisition and exploration program, there is no assurance that we will obtain the funding necessary to pursue any advanced exploration of any mineral claims.

Three Months Ended November 30, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended November 30, 2015

Our net loss for the three months ended November 30, 2016 was $116,000, compared to $180,000 for the same period ended November 30, 2015, the difference is mainly due to our operating expenses for the three months ended November 30, 2016 decreased by $65,000 to $115,000 from $180,000 for the same period ended November 30, 2015. The main operating expenses changes are as follows:

21

Six Months Ended November 30, 2016 Compared to Six Months Ended November 30, 2015

Our net loss for the six months ended November 30, 2016 was $253,000, compared to $316,000 for the same period ended November 30, 2015, the difference is mainly due to gain on disposal of equipment increased by $25,000 for the six months ended November 30, 2016 and our operating expenses for the six months ended November 30, 2016 decreased by $41,000 to $285,000 from $326,000 for the same period ended November 30, 2015. The main operating expenses changes are as follows:

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has been reviewing its budgets for its current business needs and its further exploration. We estimate that our total expenditures for our fiscal year ending May 31, 2017 are approximately $1.2 million, as outlined above under the heading “Plan of Operations”. For the six months ended November 30, 2016, the Company spent $285,000 in operations. At November 30, 2016, we had cash of $49,000 and a working capital deficit of $459,000. We believe that we have insufficient capital to fund our plan of operations.

On January 16, 2016, the Company entered into a credit facility agreement with a private company controlled by our Chairman of the Board of Directors. The funding is in the form of an interest-free unsecured loan to the Company of up to $360,000 due December 31, 2018. A maximum amount of $30,000 may be drawn by the Company per calendar month. As of the date of this report, we received a total of $250,000, with $110,000 available to be withdrawn pursuant to this facility agreement.

We have not generated revenues since the date of inception on January 5, 2004, and our cash has been generated primarily from the sale of our securities and loans from related parties. We anticipate that we will not generate any revenue in near future. We anticipate that additional funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock, related parties debt financing, joint ventures or some combination of these or other means. We believe that external debt financing will not be an alternative at this stage for funding additional phases of our exploration as we do not have significant tangible assets to secure any debt financing.

We cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding to continue our acquisition and exploration program going forward. If we are not able to obtain financing in the amounts required or on terms that are acceptable to us, we may be forced to scale back, or abandon, our plan of operations. Even if we are successful in obtaining equity and/or debt financing to fund our acquisition and exploration program, there is no assurance that we will obtain the funding necessary to pursue any advanced exploration of any mineral claims. If we do not continue to obtain additional funding, we will be forced to abandon our mineral claims and our plan of operations.

22

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities decreased by $54,000 to $178,000 during the six months ended November 30, 2016, as compared to $232,000 during the same period in 2015.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash provided in investing activities was $35,000 during the six months ended November 30, 2016 (the six months ended November 30, 2015: 10,000) due to proceeds from disposal of automobile vehicles.

Net Cash from Financing Activities

During the six months ended November 30, 2016, we received $140,000 (the six months ended November 30, 2015: $270,000) in loans pursuant to facility agreements with related parties. We have funded our business to date primarily from sales of our common stock and loans from related parties.

There are no assurances that we will be able to achieve further sales of our common stock or any other form of additional financing. If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue our plan of operations, then we will not be able to continue our exploration of the property underlying our mineral claim interest and our venture will fail.

Going Concern

We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue any extensive exploration activities. The Company has not generated any revenues and has accumulated losses of $118 million since inception to November 30, 2016. In addition, we had working capital deficit of $459,000 as of November 30, 2016.

Future Financings

We anticipate continuing to rely on equity sales of our common shares, debt financing from our related parties, and/or other financing in order to continue to fund our business operations through our fiscal year ending May 31, 2017. Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to our existing shareholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of our equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our planned exploration activities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.

Related Party Transactions

The details of related party transactions are disclosed in footnote 8 of our Company’s interim unaudited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2016 (Item 1, above).

Segment Disclosures

The Company operates in one reportable segment, located in Tanzania Africa, being the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. The details of segment disclosures are disclosed in footnote 12 of our Company’s interim unaudited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2016 (Item 1, above).

Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has had a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Contractual Obligations

23

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

We regularly evaluate the accounting policies and estimates that we use to prepare our consolidated financial statements. In general, management’s estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management.

The critical accounting policies are disclosed in footnote 2 of our Company’s interim unaudited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2016 (Item 1, above).

We believe the critical accounting policies require us to make significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.