Notes
to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Note 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Health Discovery Corporation (“HDC”
or the “Company”) is a machine learning company that uses advanced mathematical techniques to analyze large amounts
of data to uncover patterns that might otherwise be undetectable. The Company operates primarily in the field of molecular diagnostics
where such tools are critical to scientific discovery. The terms artificial intelligence and machine learning are sometimes used
to describe pattern recognition tools. HDC’s mission is to use its patents, intellectual prowess, and clinical partnerships
principally to identify patterns that can advance the science of medicine, as well as to advance the effective use of our technology
in other diverse business disciplines, including the high-tech, financial, and healthcare technology markets.
Our historical foundation lies in the
molecular diagnostics field where we have made a number of discoveries that may play a role in developing more personalized approaches
to the diagnosis and treatment of certain diseases. However, our Support Vector Machines (“SVM”) assets in particular
have broad applicability in many other fields. Intelligently applied, HDC’s pattern recognition technology can be a portal
between enormous amounts of otherwise undecipherable data and truly meaningful discovery.
Our Company’s principal asset
is its intellectual property, which includes advanced mathematical algorithms called SVM, as well as biomarkers that we discovered
by applying our SVM techniques to complex genetic and proteomic data. Biomarkers are biological indicators or genetic expression
signatures of certain disease states. Our intellectual property is protected by 31 patents that have been issued or are currently
pending around the world.
Our business model has evolved over
time to respond to business trends that intersect with our technological expertise and our capacity to professionally manage these
opportunities. In the beginning, we sought only to use our SVMs internally in order to discover and license our biomarker signatures
to various diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies. Today, our commercialization efforts include: utilization of our discoveries
and knowledge to help develop diagnostic and prognostic predictive tests; licensing of the SVM technologies directly to diagnostic
companies; and, the potential formation of new ventures with domain experts in other fields where our pattern recognition technology
holds commercial promise.
The accompanying interim financial statements
included in this report are unaudited but reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented for Health Discovery Corporation
(“the Company”). All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The accounting principles followed by the Company
and the methods of applying these principles conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”). Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results of a full year’s operations and should
be read in conjunction with the financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Estimates and assumptions
In preparing financial statements in conformity
with GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements.
Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates due to risks and uncertainties, including uncertainty in the current
economic environment due to the recent outbreak of a novel strain of the coronavirus (“COVID-19”).
Segments
Our chief executive officer and president,
in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance, views our operations and manages our business as one
operating segment.
Note 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Valuation of Common Stock Warrants Liability
The Company has, from time to time beginning
in 2014, issued convertible preferred stock, preferred stock warrants, common stock, common stock warrants, and fully vested options
to purchase shares of common stock in excess of its available shares of underlying stock to be issued.
In the event the number of shares or warrants of common stock
granted exceeds the number of shares available if the holders exercised all of the previously issued outstanding options and warrants,
the Company accounts for this excess as a common stock warrants liability, which
is adjusted to fair value at the end of each reporting period. If and when the Company authorizes sufficient shares of common stock
and preferred stock, the common stock warrants liability is reclassified to equity at the fair value of the liability at the date
of reclassification. The Company accounts for the reclassification from equity to liability (or vice versa) similar to a
modification of a share-based payment award.
See further discussion in Note 6 –
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) and Note 7– Common Stock Warrants Liability.
Stock-based Compensation
Stock-based compensation cost is measured
at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line
method.
Valuation and Amortization
Method – The fair value of stock awards that do not contain a market condition target are estimated on the grant date
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The fair value of options that contain a market condition, such as a specified hurdle
price, is estimated on the grant date using a probability weighted fair value model similar to a lattice valuation model.
Both the Black-Scholes and the probability weighted valuation models require assumptions and estimates of expected volatility,
expected life, expected dividend yield and expected risk-free interest rates.
Expected Term –
The expected term of the award represents the period that the Company’s stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding
and was determined based on historical experience, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting
schedules, and forfeitures due to departure prior to the end of the vesting schedule.
Expected Volatility –
Volatility is a measure of the amounts by which a financial variable such as stock price has fluctuated (historical volatility)
or is expected to fluctuate (expected volatility) during a period. The Company uses the historical volatility, employing a prior
period equivalent to the expected term to estimate expected volatility
Risk-Free Interest Rate
– The Company bases the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes valuation method on the implied yield currently
available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equivalent to the expected term of a stock award.
Note 3 – NET INCOME (LOSS)
PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”)
is computed by dividing income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
for the period. Diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive
potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares include
outstanding stock options, convertible promissory notes payable, convertible preferred stock, and warrants.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings
per share was as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Net income (loss), in thousands
|
|
$
|
1,412
|
|
|
$
|
2,124
|
|
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic
|
|
|
393,553,617
|
|
|
|
301,718,989
|
|
|
|
391,113,557
|
|
|
|
286,967,608
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options and warrants
|
|
|
10,999,091
|
|
|
|
58,668,829
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
42,822,730
|
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
15,398,551
|
|
|
|
94,306,253
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
94,306,253
|
|
Series D preferred stock
|
|
|
20,991,891
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
- diluted
|
|
|
440,943,150
|
|
|
|
454,694,071
|
|
|
|
391,113,557
|
|
|
|
424,096,591
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.004
|
|
|
$
|
0.007
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
0.007
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.003
|
|
|
|
0.005
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.005
|
|
The dilutive effect of 82,440,220 and
20,834,604, and 167,223 and 2,443,590, options and warrants were excluded from diluted weighted average shares during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, and the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, because the
strike or conversion price was below the average share price during the related period.
In addition, the dilutive effect of
35,158,452 options and warrants, 15,398,551 common shares issuable under convertible debt, and 20,991,891 common shares issuable
under convertible Series D preferred stock have been excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average shares during the
six months ended June 30, 2020 as to include them would have been anti-dilutive as a result of the net loss.
Note 4 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION and
other EQUITY BASED PAYMENTS
In connection with their election to the
Company’s Board of Directors at the Annual Shareholder Meeting and in recognition of their continuing contributions to the
Company, on June 1, 2020, the Company granted to certain of the directors each a one-time cash payment of $20,000 as well
as an option to purchase 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Additionally, the Chairman of the Board and the
President and Chief Operating Officer were each granted an option to purchase 5,000,000 shares and 4,500,000, respectively, of
the Company’s common stock. The option grants are consistent with what has been granted to other board members and management
of the Company. The options immediately vest, have an exercise price of $0.0138 and expire on June 1, 2030. The exercise price
is based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the option grant. The fair value of each option
granted was $0.0125 and was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions:
dividend yield at 0%, risk-free interest rate of 1.84%, an expected life of 5 years, and volatility of 147%. The aggregate value
of $268,000 related to the options granted was charged to stock-based compensation expense during the second quarter of 2020.
As of June 30, 2020, there was no
unrecognized cost related to stock option grants. As the market closing price was $0.013 on June 30, 2020, there was
no aggregate intrinsic value of all options and warrants outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2020.
Stock-based compensation expense recorded
in the financial statements was the following (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
513
|
|
The following schedule summarizes stock
option information as of December 31, 2019 and June 30, 2020.
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2019
|
|
|
42,375,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.0308
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
21,500,000
|
|
|
|
0.0138
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding and exercisable, June 30, 2020
|
|
|
63,875,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.0245
|
|
The Company has outstanding the following
common stock warrants:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2019
|
|
|
74,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.0328
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
41,983,871
|
|
|
|
0.0103
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding, June 30, 2020
|
|
|
115,983,781
|
|
|
$
|
0.0247
|
|
Note 5 – PATENTS
The Company’s principal asset is
its intellectual property, which includes advanced mathematical algorithms called Support Vector Machines (“SVM”),
as well as biomarkers that we discovered by applying its SVM techniques to complex genetic and proteomic data. Biomarkers are biological
indicators or genetic expression signatures of certain disease states. The Company’s intellectual property is protected by
31 patents that have been issued or are currently pending around the world.
Initial costs paid to purchase patents are capitalized and amortized
using the straight-line method over the remaining life of the patent. Amortization charged to operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2019 totaled $66,000 and $131,000, respectively. There was no amortization charged to operations for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2020. Patent costs have been fully amortized as of June 30, 2020 and December 31,
2019.
Note 6 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY(DEFICIT)
Authorized capital
On May 27, 2020, the Company held
its Annual Shareholder Meeting. One of the proposals presented by the Company in its proxy statement was an approval to amend the
Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 450,000,000 to 900,000,000
and to increase the number of authorized shares of preferred stock from 45,000,000 to 90,000,000. This proposal received a majority
of votes and was therefore approved by the shareholders.
Series D Preferred Stock
The Company’s Series D preferred
stock has the following rights and preferences:
Dividend rights: The holders
of Series D preferred stock shares pari passu with the holders of common stock in dividends payable to stockholders.
Voting rights: Each share
of Series D preferred stock is entitled to vote on all matters submitted to stockholder vote and each share has a number of
votes equal to ten votes for the same number of shares of common stock into which it is then convertible.
Conversion rights: Each
share of Series D preferred stock is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a 1:1 ratio at the option
of the holder or on the ten-year anniversary of issuance, whichever occurs first.
Liquidation rights: In
the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the Series D holders receive
distribution on a pari passu basis with the holders of other preferred stock holders after payment of the Preferred Stock
dividends payable to the Series A Preferred Stockholders and before any payments to common stockholders.
In February 2020, the Company effected
the conversion of its $200,000 outstanding promissory note, plus accrued interest of $16,688, into shares of its Series D
Preferred Stock. The note holders retain their outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate of 41,983,781 shares of the Company’s
common stock at a weighted average price of $0.0103. Each warrant expires on July 31, 2029.
Common Stock
On June 1, 2020, the Chairman of the
Board and the Company entered into an agreed upon settlement whereby accrued wages of $212,500 were immediately converted into
15,398,551 shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.0138.
All of these issuances of equity securities
were made in reliance upon exemptions from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.
Note 7 – COMMON STOCK WARRANTS LIABILITY
The common stock warrants liability is
recorded based upon the vested number of warrants or other equity-linked instruments outstanding which exceed the number of authorized
shares available to meet the assumed exercise or conversion of such instruments at each reporting period.
During the three months ended June 30,
2020, the Company recorded other income of $2.2 million related to the change in common stock warrants liability. In the six months
ended June 30, 2020, the Company recorded other income of $992,000 related to the reduction of the common stock warrants liability.
At June 30, 2020, the common stock warrants liability is zero as the Company has adequate authorized shares available to meet
the assumed exercise or conversion of its issued options, warrants, convertible debt and convertible preferred stock.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the Company’s
common stock warrants liability for the six months ended June 30, 2020:
|
|
Warrant Liability
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
1,898
|
|
Change in fair value of common stock warrants liability
|
|
|
(992
|
)
|
Reclassification of common stock warrants liability to equity
|
|
|
(906
|
)
|
Balance at June 30, 2020
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
As of June 30, 2020, the Company had 179,858,781 options and
warrants outstanding with exercise prices varying from $0.003 to $0.070.
Note 8 – CONVERTIBLE DEBT
On June 1, 2020, an additional $212,000
in accrued wages was converted into a convertible promissory note. The promissory note is convertible into common stock of the
Company at a conversion price of $0.0138. The conversion price is based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock
on June 1, 2020. The promissory note bears interest at an annual rate of 8%.
Note 9 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The carrying values of our prepaid expenses,
accounts payable, accrued wages, and accrued liabilities approximate their recorded values due to the short-term nature of these
instruments.
Note 10 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases
The Company does not own any real property. The
Company leases approximately 600 square feet of office space in Atlanta, Georgia, pursuant to a short-term lease as of August 2019.
The Company currently pays base rent in the amount of $2,539 per month. The Company also leases approximately 400 square feet of
office space in Berwyn, Pennsylvania, pursuant to a short-term lease as of November 2019. The Company currently pays base
rent in the amount of $1,078 per month.
Legal Proceedings
Intel Matter
In September 2016, the Company initiated
an Interference proceeding between the Company and Intel Corporation (“Intel”) with United States Patent and Trademark
Office (“USPTO”) for Interference between the Company’s pending patent application covering SVM-Recursive Feature
Elimination (“SVM-RFE”) and Intel’s Patent No. 7,685,077, entitled “Recursive Feature Eliminating
Method based on a Support Vector Machine”.
On February 27, 2019, the USPTO ruled
in favor of the Company on the SVM-RFE Patents. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the USPTO issued its decision, finding that
the Company is entitled to claim exclusive rights to the SVM-RFE technology. The decision, issued by Administrative Patent Judge
James Moore, ordered Intel’s patent to be cancelled. The decision also dismissed Intel’s motions challenging the validity
of the Company’s pending claims and issued patents covering SVM-RFE.
On July 23, 2020, the Company filed
an infringement lawsuit against Intel. This infringement suit pertains to the Company’s SVM-RFE. The lawsuit was filed in
the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division.
Quirk and Bear Matter
On February 7, 2020, two shareholders
of the Company, William F. Quirk, Jr. (“Quirk”) and Cindy Bear (“Bear”), filed a motion for a temporary
restraining order and preliminary injunction in DeKalb County Superior Court. Among the items in the motion, Quirk and Bear requested
to have a special meeting of the shareholders and Quirk and Bear alleged misconduct by the Company and its directors.
On March 2, 2020, having received
no relief, Quirk and Bear dismissed their action in DeKalb County and filed a new lawsuit in Fulton County Superior Court based
on substantially similar allegations and seeking similar relief. On March 5, 2020, the Fulton County court denied their emergency
motion for a temporary restraining order against the Company and set an evidentiary hearing on Quirk and Bear’s motion for
a preliminary injunction for March 27, 2020. This hearing was postponed due to COVID-19. On May 5, 2020, Fox Rothschild
LLP moved to withdraw as counsel for Quirk and Bear abruptly and without notice. On May 13, 2020, the Court entered an order
granting the law firm’s withdrawal as counsel. As of May 13, 2020, Quirk and Bear are representing themselves pro se.
On June 18, 2020, the Company was
successful in its motion to transfer this action to the Business Division of Fulton County.
The Company denies all allegations
of improper conduct in the complaint and will continue to defend itself against all allegations. As a result, the Company
has incurred expenses totaling $33,000 and $185,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, related to
legal fees associated with this litigation. Although the Company believes that it will ultimately be successful in its defense,
there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in its defense. Should Quirk and Bear be successful, the outcome
could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Note 11 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Fair Value Measurement
On August 28, 2018, Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements
for Fair Value Measurement.” The new standard modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820,
“Fair Value Measurement.” Certain requirements were removed such as the amount of and reasons for transfers between
Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, certain requirements were modified and certain disclosures were added such as
the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value
measurements held at the end of the reporting period. This standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2021.
The Company is currently evaluating the effects this standard will have, if any, on its financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
Financial Instruments – Credit
Losses
In November 2019, the FASB issued
ASU No. 2019-10 which provides a framework to stagger effective dates for future major accounting standards and amends the
effective dates for certain new accounting standards, including ASU No. 2016-13, “Credit Losses,” to give implementation
relief. The new standard, as amended, will replace the incurred loss impairment methodology under current GAAP with a methodology
that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to
inform credit loss estimates. The Company will be required to use a forward-looking expected credit loss model for accounts receivable,
loans, and other financial instruments. Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities will also be recorded through
an allowance for credit losses rather than as a reduction in the amortized cost basis of the securities. The standard will be adopted
upon the effective date for the Company beginning January 1, 2023. Adoption of the standard will be applied using a modified
retrospective approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the effective date to align the Company’s
credit loss methodology with the new standard. The Company is currently evaluating the effects this standard will have, if any,
on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Income Taxes
On December 18, 2019, the FASB issued
ASU No. 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” This new guidance simplifies
the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions such as the exception to the incremental approach for intra period
tax allocation when there is a loss from continuing operations and income/gain from other items; and the exception to the general
methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period when a year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated loss for the year.
The new guidance also simplifies the accounting for income taxes under certain circumstances such as requiring that an entity recognize
a franchise tax that is partially based on income as an income-based tax and account for any incremental amount incurred as a non-income-based
tax; requiring that an entity evaluate when a step up in the tax basis of goodwill should be considered part of a business combination
in which the book goodwill was originally recognized and when it should be considered a separate transaction; and requiring that
an entity reflect the effect of an enacted change in tax laws or rates in the annual effective tax rate computation in the interim
period that includes the enactment date. This standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2021. The Company is
currently evaluating the effects this standard will have, if any, on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Note 12 – FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND GOING CONCERN
The Company has prepared its financial
statements on a “going concern” basis, which presumes that it will be able to realize our assets and discharge our
liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future.
The Company’s ability to continue
as a going concern is dependent upon our licensing arrangements with third parties, achieving profitable operations, obtaining
additional financing and successfully bringing the Company’s technologies to the market. The outcome of these matters
cannot be predicted at this time. The Company’s financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and
do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classifications of the assets and liabilities that might be necessary should
the Company be unable to continue in business.
If the going concern assumption was
not appropriate for the Company’s financial statements then adjustments would be necessary in the carrying value of assets
and liabilities, the reported expenses and the balance sheet classifications used. Such adjustments may be material.
At June 30, 2020, the Company had
$1.66 million cash on hand. As a result, the Company estimates cash will be depleted by the fourth quarter of 2022 if the
Company does not generate sufficient cash to support operations.
The Company’s plan to have sufficient
cash to support operations is comprised of generating revenue through providing services related to those patents, pursuing infringement
opportunities and obtaining additional equity or debt financing.
The Company believes the funds received from the NeoGenomics
arbitration award will allow the Company to maintain operations until fourth quarter 2022. While the Company believes these efforts
should increase the value of the Company, there is no guarantee the Company will be successful in these efforts.
Note 13 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 23, 2020, the Company filed a patent infringement
lawsuit against Intel. This infringement suit pertains to the Company’s SVM-RFE. The lawsuit was filed in the United States
District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division.