Introductory Note
As previously disclosed, on March 25, 2021, MSG Networks Inc., a Delaware corporation (MSG Networks), entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSG Entertainment) and Broadway Sub Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of MSG Entertainment
(Merger Sub). The Merger Agreement provides that, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, (a) Merger Sub will be merged with and into MSG Networks (the
Merger), with MSG Networks surviving and continuing as the surviving corporation in the Merger, and (b) (i) each share of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of MSG Networks (MSGN
Class A Common Stock) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger will be automatically converted into the right to receive a number of shares of Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, of MSG Entertainment (MSGE Class A Common Stock) such that each holder of record of shares of MSGN Class A Common Stock will have the right to receive,
in the aggregate, such number of shares of MSGE Class A Common Stock equal to the total number of shares of MSGN Class A Common Stock held of record immediately prior to the effective time multiplied by 0.172, with such
product rounded up to the next whole share, and (ii) each share of Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of MSG Networks (MSGN Class B Common Stock) issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the effective time will be automatically converted into the right to receive, in the aggregate, a number of shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of MSG Entertainment (MSGE
Class B Common Stock) such that each holder of record of shares of MSGN Class B Common Stock will have the right to receive, in the aggregate, a number of shares of MSGE Class B Common Stock
equal to the total number of shares of MSGN Class B Common Stock held of record immediately prior to the effective time multiplied by 0.172, with such product rounded up to the next whole share, in each case except for shares
held by MSG Entertainment, Merger Sub or any of the MSG Entertainment subsidiaries or MSG Networks or any of the MSG Networks subsidiaries as treasury stock (in each case not held on behalf of third parties). On June 4, 2021, MSG Entertainment
and MSG Networks filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) a joint proxy statement/prospectus (the Definitive Proxy Statement) with respect to the special meetings of MSG
Entertainment and MSG Networks stockholders, each scheduled to be held on July 8, 2021, in connection with the Merger.
Litigation Related to the Merger
As of July 1,
2021, eleven complaints have been filed in connection with the Merger.
Six complaints were filed by purported stockholders of MSG Networks in the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York (together, the MSGN NY Federal Actions). On May 7, 2021, a purported stockholder filed a complaint captioned Shiva Stein v. MSG Networks
Inc. et al., 21-cv-04126. On May 21, 2021, a purported stockholder filed a complaint captioned Jiaming Wang v. MSG Networks
Inc. et al., 21-cv-04578. On May 30, 2021, a purported stockholder filed a complaint captioned Marc Waterman v. MSG Networks Inc., et
al., 21-cv-04814. On June 21, 2021, a purported stockholder filed a complaint captioned Ezriel Tauber v. MSG Networks Inc., et al., 21-cv-05445. On June 24, 2021, a purported stockholder filed a complaint captioned Jerome Anderson v. MSG Networks Inc., et al., 21-cv-05534. On June 25, 2021, a purported stockholder filed a complaint captioned Joseph Sheridan v. MSG Networks Inc., et al., 21-cv-05575. All six complaints are similar. Each complaint names MSG Networks and the MSG Networks board members as defendants. The Stein, Wang, and
Waterman complaints allege, among other things, that the registration statement on Form S-4 filed by MSG Entertainment on May 7, 2021 (which was amended on June 2, 2021) in
connection with the Merger is materially incomplete and misleading in violation of Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder. The
Tauber, Anderson and Sheridan complaints allege that the Definitive Proxy Statement is materially incomplete and misleading in violation of the Exchange Act. All six complaints seek, among other relief, an injunction preventing
the closing of the Merger unless and until the defendants disclose material information allegedly omitted from the registration statement or Definitive Proxy Statement, rescission of the Merger Agreement to the extent already implemented (or
awarding of rescissory damages), damages, and an award of attorneys and experts fees.
Two additional disclosure complaints were filed by
purported stockholders of MSG Networks in federal district courts (together with the MSGN NY Federal Actions, the MSGN Federal Actions). On June 25, 2021, a complaint captioned Patrick Plumley v. MSG Networks
Inc. et al., 21-cv-00909, was filed by a purported stockholder of MSG Networks in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. On June 28, 2021, a
complaint captioned Matthew Whitfield v. MSG Networks Inc. et al., 21-cv-02868, was filed by a purported stockholder of MSG Networks in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The complaints are similar. The complaints name MSG Networks and the MSG Networks board members as defendants and allege that the Definitive Proxy Statement is materially incomplete and
2