An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. Public Shareholders should consider carefully all of the risks described below, together with the other
information contained in this Report, before making a decision to invest in our units. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition and operating results may be materially adversely affected. In that event, the trading
price of our securities could decline, and Public Shareholders could lose all or part of their investment.
Risks Relating to our Search for, and Consummation of or Inability to Consummate, a Partnering Transaction
Our shareholders may not be afforded an opportunity to vote on our proposed Partnering Transaction, which means we may
complete our Partnering Transaction even though a majority of our shareholders do not support such a transaction.
We may choose not to hold a shareholder vote to approve our Partnering Transaction if the Partnering Transaction would not require shareholder approval under
applicable law or stock exchange listing requirements. Except for as required by applicable law or stock exchange requirements, the decision as to whether we will seek shareholder approval of a proposed Partnering Transaction or will allow
shareholders to sell their shares to us in a tender offer will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors, such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise
require us to seek shareholder approval. Accordingly, we may complete our Partnering Transaction even if holders of a majority of our Ordinary Shares do not approve of the Partnering Transaction we complete.
Our Public Shareholders’ only opportunity to affect the investment decision regarding a potential Partnering Transaction may
be limited to the exercise of their right to redeem their shares from us for cash.
Our Public Shareholders will not be provided with an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of our Partnering Transaction. Since our board of directors
may complete a Partnering Transaction without seeking shareholder approval, Public Shareholders may not have the right or opportunity to vote on the Partnering Transaction, unless we seek such shareholder vote. Accordingly, our Public
Shareholders’ only opportunity to affect the investment decision regarding our Partnering Transaction may be limited to exercising their redemption rights within the period of time (which will be at least 20 business days) set forth in our tender
offer documents mailed to them in which we describe our Partnering Transaction.
If we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction, our Initial Shareholders and management team have agreed to
vote in favor of such Partnering Transaction, regardless of how our Public Shareholders vote.
Our Initial Shareholders hold 20% of the outstanding voting power of our Ordinary Shares (not including the Forward Purchase Shares). Our Initial Shareholders and
management team also may from time to time purchase Class A Ordinary Shares prior to our Partnering Transaction. Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provides that, if we seek shareholder approval of a Partnering
Transaction, such Partnering Transaction will be approved if we receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares voted at such meeting, including the Founder Shares and the Performance Shares. As a result, in addition to the Founder
Shares and Performance Shares, we would need 12,640,500, or 45%, of the 28,090,000 Public Shares sold in our Initial Public Offering to be voted in favor of a Partnering Transaction in order to have our Partnering Transaction approved (assuming
all outstanding shares are voted). Accordingly, if we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction, the agreement by our Initial Shareholders and management team to vote in favor of our Partnering Transaction will increase the
likelihood that we will receive the requisite shareholder approval for such Partnering Transaction.
The ability of our Public Shareholders to redeem their shares for cash may make our financial condition unattractive to
potential partnering candidate, which may make it difficult for us to enter into a Partnering Transaction with a partnering candidate.
We may seek to enter into a Partnering Transaction agreement with a prospective partnering candidate that requires as a closing condition that we have a minimum net
worth or a certain amount of cash. If too many Public Shareholders exercise their redemption rights, we would not be able to meet such closing condition and, as a result, would not be able to proceed with the Partnering Transaction. Furthermore,
in no event will we redeem our Public Shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001. Consequently, if accepting all properly submitted redemption requests would cause our net tangible assets to be less
than $5,000,001 or make us unable to satisfy a minimum cash condition as described above, we would not proceed with such redemption and the related Partnering Transaction and may instead search for an alternate Partnering Transaction.
Prospective partnering candidates will be aware of these risks and, thus, may be reluctant to enter into a Partnering Transaction with us.
In evaluating a prospective target business for our initial Partnering Transaction, our management may rely on the
availability of all of the funds from the sale of the Forward Purchase Securities to be used as part of the consideration to the sellers in the initial Partnering Transaction. If the sale of the Forward Purchase Securities does not close, we may
lack sufficient funds to consummate our initial Partnering Transaction.
On June 30, 2021, we entered into a Forward Purchase Agreement with an affiliate, Corsair V Financial Services Capital Partners, L.P., pursuant to which such investor
committed to purchase in the aggregate, up to 10,000,000 units, with each unit consisting of one Class A ordinary share and one-third of one warrant to purchase one Class A ordinary share at $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment, at a purchase
price of $10.00 per unit, in private placements to occur concurrently, and only in connection with, the closing of our initial Partnering Transaction. The obligations of the investor under the Forward Purchase Agreement will not depend on whether
any Class A Ordinary Shares are redeemed by our Public Shareholders. The obligations of such investor to purchase the Forward Purchase Securities are subject to the approval, prior to our entering into a definitive agreement for our initial
Partnering Transaction, of its investment committee and the Forward Purchase Agreement contains customary closing conditions. However, if the sale of the Forward Purchase Securities does not close, we may lack
sufficient funds to consummate our initial Partnering Transaction.
The requirement that we complete our Partnering Transaction by October 6, 2023 (or such later date as approved by holders of a
majority of the voting power of our outstanding Ordinary Shares that are voted at a meeting to extend such date, voting together as a single class) may give potential partnering candidates leverage over us in negotiating a Partnering Transaction
and may limit the time we have in which to conduct due diligence on potential Partnering Transaction candidates, in particular as we approach our dissolution deadline, which could undermine our ability to complete our Partnering Transaction on
terms that would produce value for our shareholders.
Any potential partnering candidate with which we enter into negotiations concerning a Partnering Transaction will be aware that we must complete our Partnering
Transaction by October 6, 2023. Consequently, such partnering candidate may obtain leverage over us in negotiating a Partnering Transaction, knowing that if we do not complete our Partnering Transaction with that particular partnering candidate,
we may be unable to complete our Partnering Transaction with any partnering candidate. This risk will increase as we get closer to the timeframe described above. In addition, we may have limited time to conduct due diligence and may enter into
our Partnering Transaction on terms that we would have rejected upon a more comprehensive investigation.
Our search for a Partnering Transaction, and any partnering candidate with which we ultimately consummate a Partnering
Transaction, may be materially adversely affected by the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and the status of debt and equity markets.
The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected, and other events (such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters or a significant outbreak of other infectious diseases)
could adversely affect, economies and financial markets worldwide, and the business of any potential partnering candidate with which we consummate a Partnering Transaction could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, we may be unable
to complete a Partnering Transaction if concerns relating to COVID-19 continue to restrict travel, limit the ability to have meetings with potential investors or the target company’s personnel, or vendors and services providers are unavailable to
negotiate and consummate a transaction in a timely manner. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our search for a Partnering Transaction will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new
information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. If the disruptions posed by COVID-19 or other matters of global concern continue for an extensive period of
time, our ability to consummate a Partnering Transaction, or the operations of a partnering candidate with which we ultimately consummate a Partnering Transaction, may be materially adversely affected.
In addition, our ability to consummate a Partnering Transaction may be dependent on the ability to raise equity and debt financing, which may be impacted by COVID-19
and other events (such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters or a significant outbreak of other infectious diseases), including as a result of increased market volatility, decreased market liquidity and third-party financing being unavailable
on terms acceptable to us or at all.
We may not be able to complete our Partnering Transaction by October 6, 2023, in which case we would cease all operations
except for the purpose of winding up and we would redeem our Public Shares and liquidate.
We may not be able to find a suitable partnering candidate and complete our Partnering Transaction by October 6, 2023. Our ability to complete our Partnering
Transaction may be negatively impacted by general market conditions, volatility in the capital and debt markets and the other risks described herein. For example, the outbreak of COVID-19 and its variants continues to spread both in the U.S. and
globally and, while the extent of the impact of the outbreak on us will depend on future developments, it could limit our ability to complete our Partnering Transaction, including as a result of increased market volatility, decreased market
liquidity and third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable to us or at all. Additionally, the outbreak of COVID-19 and its variants may negatively impact businesses we may seek to acquire. If we have not completed our Partnering
Transaction within such time period, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the Public Shares, at a per-share price,
payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account (net of Permitted Withdrawals and up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses),
divided by the number of then outstanding Public Shares, which redemption will completely extinguish Public Shareholders’ rights as shareholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), and (iii) as promptly as
reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining shareholders and our board of directors, liquidate and dissolve, subject in each case, to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of
creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. If we are required to wind-up, liquidate the trust account and distribute such amount therein, pro rata, to our Public Shareholders, as part of any liquidation process, such winding up,
liquidation and distribution must comply with the applicable provisions of the Companies Act. In that case, Public Shareholders may be forced to wait beyond October 6, 2023 before the redemption proceeds of our trust account become available to
them, and they receive the return of their pro rata portion of the funds from our trust account. We have no obligation to return funds to Public Shareholders prior to the date of our redemption or liquidation unless we consummate our Partnering
Transaction prior thereto and only then in cases where Public Shareholders have sought to redeem their Class A Ordinary Shares. Only upon our redemption or any liquidation will Public Shareholders be entitled to distributions if we are unable to
complete our Partnering Transaction.
If we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction, our Sponsor, Initial Shareholders, directors, executive
officers, advisors and their affiliates may elect to purchase shares or public warrants from Public Shareholders, which may influence a vote on a proposed Partnering Transaction and reduce the public “float” of our Class A Ordinary Shares.
If we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our Partnering Transaction pursuant to the tender
offer rules, our Sponsor, Initial Shareholders, directors, executive officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase shares or public warrants in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market either prior to or following the
completion of our Partnering Transaction, although they are under no obligation to do so. However, other than as expressly stated herein, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions and have not formulated
any terms or conditions for any such transactions. None of the funds in the trust account will be used to purchase shares or public warrants in such transactions.
In the event that our Sponsor, Initial Shareholders, directors, executive officers, advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions
from Public Shareholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling shareholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. The purpose of any such purchase of shares could be to vote
such shares in favor of the Partnering Transaction and thereby increase the likelihood of obtaining shareholder approval of the Partnering Transaction or to satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a partnering candidate that requires us
to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing of our Partnering Transaction, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. The purpose of any such purchase of public warrants could be to reduce the
number of public warrants outstanding or to vote such warrants on any matters submitted to the warrantholders for approval in connection with our Partnering Transaction. Any such purchase of our securities may result in the completion of our
Partnering Transaction that may not otherwise have been possible. We expect any such purchase will be reported pursuant to Section 13 and Section 16 of the Exchange Act to the extent such purchasers are subject to such reporting requirements.
In addition, if such purchases are made, the public “float” of our Class A Ordinary Shares or public warrants and the number of beneficial holders of our securities
may be reduced, possibly making it difficult to obtain or maintain the quotation, listing or trading of our securities on a national securities exchange.
If we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction and we do not conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer
rules, and if any individual Public Shareholders or a “group” of shareholders are deemed to hold in excess of 15% of our Class A Ordinary Shares, such Public Shareholders will lose the ability to redeem all such shares in excess of 15% of our
Class A Ordinary Shares.
If we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our Partnering Transaction pursuant to the tender
offer rules, our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provides that a public shareholder, together with any affiliate of such shareholder or any other person with whom such shareholder is acting in concert or as a “group”
(as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking redemption rights with respect to more than an aggregate of 15% of the shares sold in our Initial Public Offering without our prior consent, which we refer to as
the “Excess Shares.” However, we would not be restricting our shareholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including Excess Shares) for or against our Partnering Transaction. Public Shareholders’ inability to redeem the Excess Shares will
reduce their influence over our ability to complete our Partnering Transaction and Public Shareholders could suffer a material loss on their investment in us if they sell Excess Shares in open market transactions. Additionally, Public
Shareholders will not receive redemption distributions with respect to the Excess Shares if we complete our Partnering Transaction. And as a result, Public Shareholders will continue to hold that number of shares exceeding 15% and, in order to
dispose of such shares, would be required to sell their shares in open market transactions, potentially at a loss.
Because of our limited resources and the significant competition for Partnering Transaction opportunities, it may be more
difficult for us to complete our Partnering Transaction. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to
Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We expect to encounter competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including private investors (which may be individuals or investment
partnerships), other blank check companies and other entities, domestic and international, competing for the types of businesses we intend to acquire. Many of these individuals and entities are well-established and have extensive experience in
identifying and effecting, directly or indirectly, acquisitions of companies operating in or providing services to various industries. Many of these competitors possess similar or greater technical, human and other resources to ours or more local
industry knowledge than we do and our financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe there are numerous partnering candidates we could potentially acquire with the net
proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, our ability to compete with respect to the acquisition of certain partnering candidates that are sizable will be limited by our available financial resources.
This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain partnering candidates. Furthermore, we are obligated to offer holders of our Public Shares the right to redeem their shares for cash at the time
of our Partnering Transaction in conjunction with a shareholder vote or via a tender offer. Partnering candidates will be aware that this may reduce the resources available to us for our Partnering Transaction. Any of these obligations may place
us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a Partnering Transaction. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are
available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
If the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering not being held in the trust account are insufficient to allow us to operate
for at least until October 6, 2023, it could limit the amount available to fund our search for a partnering candidate or candidates and complete our Partnering Transaction, and we will depend on loans from our Sponsor or management team to fund
our search and to complete our Partnering Transaction.
As of December 31, 2021, we had approximately $882,000 in cash held outside the trust account to fund our working capital requirements. We believe that the funds
available to us outside of the trust account are sufficient to allow us to operate for at least until October 6, 2023; however, we cannot assure Public Shareholders that our estimate is accurate. We could use a portion of the funds available to
us to pay fees to consultants to assist us with our search for a partnering candidate. We could also use a portion of the funds as a down payment or to fund a no-shop provision (a provision in letters of intent or merger agreements designed to
keep partnering candidates from shopping around for transactions with other companies or investors on terms more favorable to such partnering candidates) with respect to a particular proposed Partnering Transaction, although we do not have any
current intention to do so. If we entered into a letter of intent or merger agreement where we paid for the right to receive exclusivity from a partnering candidate and were subsequently required to forfeit such funds (whether as a result of our
breach or otherwise), we might not have sufficient funds to continue searching for, or conduct due diligence with respect to, a partnering candidate.
If we are required to seek additional capital, we would need to borrow funds from our Sponsor, management team or other third parties to operate or may be forced to
liquidate. Neither our Sponsor, members of our management team nor any of their affiliates is under any obligation to advance funds to us in such circumstances. Any such advances would be repaid only from funds held outside the trust account or
from funds released to us upon completion of our Partnering Transaction. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into Private Placement Warrants of the post-Partnering Transaction entity at a price of $1.50 per private placement warrant
at the option of the lender. The warrants would be identical to the Private Placement Warrants. Prior to the completion of our Partnering Transaction, we do not expect to seek loans from parties other than our Sponsor or an affiliate of our
Sponsor as we do not believe third parties will be willing to loan such funds and provide a waiver against any and all rights to seek access to funds in our trust account. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction because we do not have
sufficient funds available to us, we will be forced to cease operations and liquidate the trust account. Consequently, our Public Shareholders may only receive an estimated $10.00 per share, or possibly less, on our redemption of our Public
Shares, and our warrants will expire worthless.
Subsequent to the completion of our Partnering Transaction, we may be required to take write-downs or write-offs,
restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and the price of our securities, which could cause Public Shareholders to lose some or all of their
investment.
Even if we conduct extensive due diligence on a partnering candidate with which we combine, we cannot assure Public Shareholders that this diligence will identify all
material issues that may be present with a particular partnering candidate, that it would be possible to uncover all material issues through a customary amount of due diligence, or that factors outside of the partnering candidate and outside of
our control will not later arise. As a result of these factors, we may be forced to later write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our reporting losses. Even if our due
diligence successfully identifies certain risks, unexpected risks may arise and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have an
immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth or other covenants
to which we may be subject as a result of assuming pre-existing debt held by a partnering candidate or by virtue of our obtaining debt financing to partially finance the Partnering Transaction or thereafter. Accordingly, any shareholders or
warrant holders who choose to remain shareholders or warrant holders following the Partnering Transaction could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such shareholders or warrant holders are unlikely to have a remedy for such
reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim
under securities laws that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the Partnering Transaction contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.
We may not hold an annual general meeting until after the consummation of our Partnering Transaction, which could delay the
opportunity for our shareholders to appoint directors.
In accordance with the NYSE’s corporate governance requirements, we are not required to hold an annual general meeting until no later than one year after our first
fiscal year end following our listing on the NYSE. There is no requirement under the Companies Act for us to hold annual or extraordinary general meetings to appoint directors. Until we hold an annual general meeting, Public Shareholders may not
be afforded the opportunity to appoint directors and to discuss company affairs with management. Our board of directors is divided into three classes with only one class of directors being appointed in each year and each class (except for those
directors appointed prior to our first general meeting) serving a three-year term. In addition, as holders of our Class A Ordinary Shares, our Public Shareholders will not have the right to vote on the appointment of directors until after the
consummation of our Partnering Transaction. Only holders of Founder Shares will have the right to appoint directors in any general meeting held prior to or in connection with the completion of our Partnering Transaction.
Public Shareholders will not be permitted to exercise their warrants unless we register and qualify the underlying Class A
Ordinary Shares or certain exemptions are available.
If the issuance of the Class A Ordinary Shares upon exercise of the warrants is not registered, qualified or exempt from registration or qualification under the
Securities Act and applicable state securities laws, holders of warrants will not be entitled to exercise such warrants and such warrants may have no value and expire worthless. In such event, holders who acquired their warrants as part of a
purchase of units will have paid the full units purchase price solely for the Class A Ordinary Shares included in the units.
We have not registered, and do not intend to register the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act or any state
securities laws at this time. However, under the terms of the warrant agreement, we have agreed that, as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 15 business days, after the closing of our Partnering Transaction, we will use our
commercially reasonable efforts to file with the SEC a post-effective amendment to the registration statement covering the registration under the Securities Act of the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants and thereafter
will use our commercially reasonable efforts to cause the same to become effective within 60 business days following our Partnering Transaction and to maintain a current prospectus relating to the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of
the warrants until the expiration of the warrants in accordance with the provisions of the warrant agreement.
We cannot assure Public Shareholders that we will be able to do so if, for example, any facts or events arise which represent a fundamental change in the information
set forth in the registration statement or prospectus, the financial statements contained or incorporated by reference therein are not current or correct or the SEC issues a stop order.
If the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act, under the terms of the warrant agreement, holders of
warrants who seek to exercise their warrants will not be permitted to do so for cash and, instead, will be required to do so on a cashless basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act or another exemption.
In no event will warrants be exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis, and we will not be obligated to issue any shares to holders seeking to exercise their
warrants, unless the issuance of the shares upon such exercise is registered or qualified under the securities laws of the state of the exercising holder, or an exemption from registration or qualification is available.
If our Class A Ordinary Shares are at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of
“covered securities” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may, at our option, not permit holders of warrants who seek to exercise their warrants to do so for cash and, instead, require them to do so on a cashless basis in accordance
with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act; in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement or register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under applicable state securities laws,
and in the event we do not so elect, we will use our commercially reasonable efforts to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under applicable state securities laws to the extent an exemption is not available.
In no event will we be required to net cash settle any warrant, or issue securities (other than upon a cashless exercise as described above) or other compensation in
exchange for the warrants in the event that we are unable to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under the Securities Act or applicable state securities laws.
Public Shareholders may only be able to exercise their public warrants on a “cashless basis” under certain circumstances, and
if they do so, they will receive fewer Class A Ordinary Shares from such exercise than if they were to exercise such warrants for cash.
The warrant agreement provides that in the following circumstances holders of warrants who seek to exercise their warrants will not be permitted to do for cash and
will, instead, be required to do so on a cashless basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act: (i) if the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act in accordance
with the terms of the warrant agreement; (ii) if we have so elected and the Class A Ordinary Shares is at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of “covered
securities” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act; and (iii) if we have so elected and we call the public warrants for redemption. If Public Shareholders exercise their public warrants on a cashless basis, they would pay the warrant
exercise price by surrendering the warrants for that number of Class A Ordinary Shares equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of Class A Ordinary Shares underlying the warrants, multiplied by the excess of the
“fair market value” of our Class A Ordinary Shares (as defined in the next sentence) over the exercise price of the warrants by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value” is the average reported closing price of the Class A Ordinary
Shares for the 10 trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the notice of exercise is received by the warrant agent or on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of warrants, as applicable. In no event
will the warrants be exercisable in connection with this redemption feature for more than 0.361 Class A Ordinary Shares per warrant (subject to adjustment). As a result, Public Shareholders would receive fewer Class A Ordinary Shares from such
exercise than if they were to exercise such warrants for cash.
Our ability to require holders of our warrants to exercise such warrants on a cashless basis after we call the warrants for
redemption or if there is no effective registration statement covering the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of these warrants will cause holders to receive fewer Class A Ordinary Shares upon their exercise of the warrants than they
would have received had they been able to pay the exercise price of their warrants in cash.
If we call the warrants for redemption, holders will have the option to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis under certain circumstances. If holders choose to
exercise their warrants on a cashless basis, the number of Class A Ordinary Shares received by a holder upon exercise will be fewer than it would have been had such holder exercised his or her warrant for cash. For example, if the holder is
exercising 875 public warrants at $11.50 per share through a cashless exercise when the Class A Ordinary Shares have a fair market value of $17.50 per share when there is no effective registration statement, then upon the cashless exercise, the
holder will receive 300 Class A Ordinary Shares. The holder would have received 875 Class A Ordinary Shares if the exercise price was paid in cash. This will have the effect of reducing the potential “upside” of the holder’s investment in our
company because the warrant holder will hold a smaller number of Class A Ordinary Shares upon a cashless exercise of the warrants they hold.
The grant of registration rights to our Initial Shareholders and holders of our Private Placement Warrants may make it more
difficult to complete our Partnering Transaction, and the future exercise of such rights may adversely affect the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares.
Pursuant to the agreement entered into concurrently with the issuance and sale of the securities in our Initial Public Offering, our Initial Shareholders and their
permitted transferees can demand that we register the Founder Shares, the Performance Shares and the Class A Ordinary Shares into which such Founder Shares and Performance Shares are convertible, holders of our Private Placement Warrants and
their permitted transferees can demand that we register the Class A Ordinary Shares and the warrants (and the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of such warrants) underlying such Private Placement Warrants, and holders of Private
Placement Warrants that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans may demand that we register the Class A Ordinary Shares and the warrants (and the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of such warrants) underlying such
Private Placement Warrants.
Pursuant to the Forward Purchase Agreement, we will use our reasonable best efforts (i) to file within 30 days after the closing of the initial Partnering Transaction
a registration statement with the SEC for a secondary offering of the Forward Purchase Shares and the Forward Purchase Warrants (and underlying Class A Ordinary Shares), (ii) to cause such registration statement to be declared effective promptly
thereafter but in no event later than 60 days after the initial filing, (iii) to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement until the earliest of (A) the date on which the purchaser or its assignees cease to hold the securities
covered thereby, and (B) the date all of the securities covered thereby can be sold publicly without restriction or limitation under Rule 144 under the Securities Act and (iv) after such registration statement is declared effective, cause us to
conduct firm commitment underwritten offerings, subject to certain limitations. In addition, the Forward Purchase Agreement provides for certain “piggy-back” registration rights to the holders of Forward Purchase Securities to include their
securities in other registration statements filed by us.
We will bear the cost of registering these securities. The registration and availability of such a significant number of securities for trading in the public market
may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. In addition, the existence of the registration rights may make our Partnering Transaction more costly or difficult to conclude. This is because the shareholders of the
partnering candidate may increase the equity stake they seek in the combined entity or ask for more cash consideration to offset the negative impact on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares that is expected when the Class A Ordinary
Shares owned by our Initial Shareholders, holders of our Private Placement Warrants, holders of our working capital loans or their respective permitted transferees are registered.
Because we are neither limited to evaluating a partnering candidate in a particular industry sector nor have we selected any
specific partnering candidate with which to pursue our Partnering Transaction, Public Shareholders will be unable to ascertain the merits or risks of any particular partnering candidate’s operations.
Our efforts to identify a prospective Partnering Transaction candidate will not be limited to a particular industry, sector or geographic region. While we may pursue a
Partnering Transaction opportunity in any industry or sector, we intend to capitalize on the ability of our management team to identify, acquire and operate a business or businesses that can benefit from our management team’s established global
relationships and operating experience. Our management team has extensive experience in identifying and executing strategic investments globally and has done so successfully in a number of sectors, including financial services. Our Amended and
Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association prohibits us from effectuating a Partnering Transaction solely with another blank check company or similar company with nominal operations. Because we have not yet selected or approached any
specific partnering candidate with respect to a Partnering Transaction, there is no basis to evaluate the possible merits or risks of any particular partnering candidate’s operations, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, financial
condition or prospects. To the extent we complete our Partnering Transaction, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business operations with which we combine. For example, if we combine with a financially unstable business or an
entity lacking an established record of sales or earnings, we may be affected by the risks inherent in the business and operations of a financially unstable or a development stage entity. Although our officers and directors will endeavor to
evaluate the risks inherent in a particular partnering candidate, we cannot assure Public Shareholders that we will properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors or that we will have adequate time to complete due diligence.
Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a partnering candidate. We also cannot assure Public Shareholders that an
investment in our units will ultimately prove to be more favorable to them than a direct investment, if such opportunity were available, in a partnering candidate. Accordingly, any shareholders or warrant holders who choose to remain shareholders
or warrant holders following the Partnering Transaction could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such shareholders or warrant holders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully
claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws that the proxy solicitation or
tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the Partnering Transaction contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.
Although we have identified general criteria and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective
partnering candidates, we may enter into our Partnering Transaction with a partnering candidate that does not meet such criteria and guidelines, and as a result, the partnering candidate with which we enter into our Partnering Transaction may
not have attributes entirely consistent with our general criteria and guidelines.
Although we have identified general criteria and guidelines for evaluating prospective partnering candidates, it is possible that a partnering candidate with which
we enter into our Partnering Transaction will not have all of these positive attributes. If we complete our Partnering Transaction with a partnering candidate that does not meet some or all of these guidelines, such combination may not be as
successful as a combination with a business that does meet all of our general criteria and guidelines. In addition, if we announce a prospective Partnering Transaction with a partnering candidate that does not meet our general criteria and
guidelines, a greater number of shareholders may exercise their redemption rights, which may make it difficult for us to meet any closing condition with a partnering candidate that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of
cash. In addition, if shareholder approval of the transaction is required by law, or we decide to obtain shareholder approval for business or other legal reasons, it may be more difficult for us to attain shareholder approval of our Partnering
Transaction if the partnering candidate does not meet our general criteria and guidelines. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that
are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We may issue additional Class A Ordinary Shares or preference shares to complete our Partnering Transaction or under an
employee incentive plan after completion of our Partnering Transaction. We may also issue Class A Ordinary Shares upon the conversion of the Founder Shares at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our Partnering Transaction as a result
of the anti-dilution provisions contained in our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association. Any such issuances would dilute the interest of our shareholders and likely present other risks.
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association authorizes the issuance of up to 380,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares, par value $0.0001 per share,
1,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares, par value, $0.0001 per share, 50,000,000 Class F Ordinary Shares, par value $0.0001 per share, and 1,000,000 preference shares, par value $0.0001 per share. As of March 15, 2022, there were 351,910,000, 750,000,
and 48,595,500 authorized but unissued Class A Ordinary Shares, Class B Ordinary Shares, and Class F Ordinary Shares, respectively, available for issuance. The Class F Ordinary Shares are automatically convertible into Class A Ordinary Shares
concurrently with or immediately following the consummation of our Partnering Transaction, initially at a one-for-one ratio but subject to adjustment as set forth herein and in our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association. As
of December 31, 2021, there are no preference shares issued and outstanding.
We may issue a substantial number of additional Class A Ordinary Shares or preference shares to complete our Partnering Transaction or under an employee incentive plan
after completion of our Partnering Transaction. We may also issue a substantial and potentially unlimited number of additional Class A Ordinary Shares in accordance with the terms of the Performance Shares, as the Performance Shares are not
subject to a conversion limitation in the event of increases in the price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. Further, our board of directors (in consultation with our Sponsor) may make a one-time election following our Initial Public Offering and
prior to the consummation of a Partnering Transaction, may elect to forfeit all of its Performance Shares, require us to effect a share split of the Founder Shares and deliver a number of Founder Shares equal to the number of Performance Shares
it forfeits.
In addition, we may also issue Class A Ordinary Shares to redeem the warrants or upon conversion of the Founder Shares at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time
of our Partnering Transaction as a result of the anti-dilution provisions as set forth therein. However, our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provides, among other things, that prior to our Partnering Transaction, we
may not issue additional shares that would entitle the holders thereof to (i) receive funds from the trust account or (ii) vote together as a single class with our then outstanding Public Shares (a) on any Partnering Transaction or (b) to approve
an amendment to our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association to (x) extend the time we have to consummate a Partnering Transaction beyond October 6, 2023 or (y) amend the foregoing provisions. These provisions of our Amended
and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, like all provisions of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, may be amended with a shareholder vote. The issuance of additional ordinary or preference shares:
|
• |
may significantly dilute the equity interest of investors in our Initial Public Offering (which dilutive effect would increase as the price of our Class A Ordinary Shares increases on a year-over-year basis, in respect of shares issued
upon conversion of the Performance Shares);
|
|
• |
may subordinate the rights of holders of Class A Ordinary Shares if preference shares are issued with rights senior to those afforded our Class A Ordinary Shares;
|
|
• |
could cause a change in control if a substantial number of Class A Ordinary Shares is issued, which may affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation
or removal of our present officers and directors; and
|
|
• |
may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our units, Class A Ordinary Shares and/or warrants.
|
Our Initial Shareholders will receive additional Class A Ordinary Shares if we issue certain shares to consummate a Partnering
Transaction.
The Founder Shares will automatically convert into Class A Ordinary Shares concurrently with or immediately following the consummation of our Partnering Transaction on
a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment for share splits, share dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like, and subject to further adjustment as provided herein. In the case that additional Class A Ordinary Shares or
Equity-Linked Securities are issued or deemed issued in connection with our Partnering Transaction (including the Forward Purchase Shares, but not including the Forward Purchase Warrants or any Class A Ordinary Shares issuable with respect to
Performance Shares), the number of Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon conversion of all Founder Shares will equal, in the aggregate, on an as-converted basis, 5% of the total number of as-converted Class A Ordinary Shares outstanding after
such conversion (or 20% of the total number of as-converted Class A Ordinary Shares outstanding, to the extent our board of directors elects the promote conversion), including the total number of Class A Ordinary Shares issued, or deemed issued
or issuable upon conversion or exercise of any Equity-Linked Securities or rights issued or deemed issued, by the Company in connection with or in relation to the consummation of the Partnering Transaction (including the Forward Purchase
Securities); provided that such conversion of Founder Shares into Class A Ordinary Shares will never occur on a less than one-for-one basis.
Resources could be wasted in researching Partnering Transactions that are not completed, which could materially adversely
affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are
available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We anticipate that the investigation of each specific partnering candidate and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and
other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If we decide not to complete a specific Partnering Transaction, the costs incurred up to that point for the
proposed transaction likely would not be recoverable. Furthermore, if we reach an agreement relating to a specific partnering candidate, we may fail to complete our Partnering Transaction for any number of reasons including those beyond our
control. Any such event will result in a loss to us of the related costs incurred which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction,
our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We may issue notes or other debt securities, or otherwise incur substantial debt, to complete a Partnering Transaction, which
may adversely affect our leverage and financial condition and thus negatively impact the value of our shareholders’ investment in us.
Although we have no commitments as of the date of this Report to issue any notes or other debt securities, we may choose to incur substantial debt to complete our
Partnering Transaction. We and our officers have agreed that we will not incur any indebtedness unless we have obtained from the lender a waiver of any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to the monies held in the trust account. As
such, no issuance of debt will affect the per share amount available for redemption from the trust account. Nevertheless, the incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative effects, including:
|
• |
default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues after a Partnering Transaction are insufficient to repay our debt obligations;
|
|
• |
acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we make all principal and interest payments when due if we breach certain covenants that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves without a waiver
or renegotiation of that covenant;
|
|
• |
our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt is payable on demand;
|
|
• |
our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if the debt contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain such financing while the debt is outstanding;
|
|
• |
our inability to pay dividends on our Class A Ordinary Shares;
|
|
• |
using a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce the funds available for dividends on our Class A Ordinary Shares if declared, expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions and
other general corporate purposes;
|
|
• |
limitations on our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry in which we operate;
|
|
• |
increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation; and
|
|
• |
limitations on our ability to borrow additional amounts for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of our strategy and other purposes and other disadvantages compared to our competitors who
have less debt.
|
We may only be able to complete one Partnering Transaction with the proceeds of our Initial Public Offering, the sale of the
Private Placement Warrants, which will cause us to be solely dependent on a single business which may have a limited number of products or services. This lack of diversification may negatively impact our operations and profitability.
The net proceeds from our Initial Public Offering and the private placement of warrants provided us with $280,950,832 that we may use to complete our Partnering
Transaction. In addition, prior to the consummation of our Initial Public Offering, we entered into a Forward Purchase Agreement with an affiliate, Corsair V Financial Services Capital Partners, L.P., pursuant to which such investor committed to
purchase in the aggregate, up to 10,000,000 units, with each unit consisting of one Class A ordinary share and one-third of one warrant to purchase one Class A ordinary share at $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment, at a purchase price of
$10.00 per unit, in private placements to occur concurrently, and only in connection with, the closing of our initial Partnering Transaction. The obligations of the investor under the Forward Purchase Agreement will not depend on whether any
Class A Ordinary Shares are redeemed by our Public Shareholders. The obligations of such investor to purchase the Forward Purchase Securities are subject to the approval, prior to our entering into a definitive agreement for our initial
Partnering Transaction, of its investment committee and the Forward Purchase Agreement contains customary closing conditions. The proceeds from the sale of Forward Purchase Securities, if any, may be used as part of the consideration to the
sellers in our initial Partnering Transaction, expenses in connection with our initial Partnering Transaction or for working capital in the post-transaction company. There can be no assurance that the purchase of the Forward Purchase Agreement
will close.
We may effectuate our Partnering Transaction with a single partnering candidate or multiple partnering candidates simultaneously or within a short period of time.
However, we may not be able to effectuate our Partnering Transaction with more than one partnering candidate because of various factors, including the existence of complex accounting issues and the requirement that we prepare and file pro forma
financial statements with the SEC that present operating results and the financial condition of several partnering candidates as if they had been operated on a combined basis. By completing our Partnering Transaction with only a single entity,
our lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments. Further, we would not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike
other entities which may have the resources to complete several Partnering Transactions in different industries or different areas of a single industry.
Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be:
|
• |
solely dependent upon the performance of a single business, property or asset, or
|
|
• |
dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.
|
This lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory risks, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the
particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to our Partnering Transaction.
We may attempt to simultaneously complete Partnering Transactions with multiple prospective partnering candidates, which may
hinder our ability to complete our Partnering Transaction and give rise to increased costs and risks that could negatively impact our operations and profitability.
If we determine to simultaneously acquire several businesses that are owned by different sellers, we will need for each of such sellers to agree that our purchase of
its business is contingent on the simultaneous closings of the other Partnering Transactions, which may make it more difficult for us, and delay our ability, to complete our Partnering Transaction. With multiple Partnering Transactions, we could
also face additional risks, including additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence investigations (if there are multiple sellers) and the additional risks associated with the subsequent
assimilation of the operations and services or products of the acquired companies in a single operating business. If we are unable to adequately address these risks, it could negatively impact our profitability and results of operations.
We may attempt to complete our Partnering Transaction with a private company about which little information is available,
which may result in a Partnering Transaction with a company that is not as profitable as we suspected, if at all.
In pursuing our Partnering Transaction strategy, we may seek to effectuate our Partnering Transaction with a privately held company. Very little public information
generally exists about private companies, and we could be required to make our decision on whether to pursue a potential Partnering Transaction on the basis of limited information, which may result in a Partnering Transaction with a company that
is not as profitable as we suspected, if at all.
We do not have a specified maximum redemption threshold. The absence of such a redemption threshold may make it possible for
us to complete our Partnering Transaction with which a substantial majority of our shareholders or warrant holders do not agree.
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association does not provide a specified maximum redemption threshold, except that in no event will we redeem our
Public Shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001. In addition, our proposed Partnering Transaction may impose a minimum cash requirement for: (i) cash consideration to be paid to the partnering
candidate or its owners, (ii) cash for working capital or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the retention of cash to satisfy other conditions. As a result, we may be able to complete our Partnering Transaction even though a substantial
majority of our Public Shareholders do not agree with the transaction and have redeemed their shares or, if we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction and do not conduct redemptions in connection with our Partnering Transaction
pursuant to the tender offer rules, have entered into privately negotiated agreements to sell their shares to our Sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or any of their affiliates. In the event the aggregate cash consideration we would be
required to pay for all Class A Ordinary Shares that are validly submitted for redemption plus any amount required to satisfy cash conditions pursuant to the terms of the proposed Partnering Transaction exceed the aggregate amount of cash
available to us, we will not complete the Partnering Transaction or redeem any shares in connection with such Partnering Transaction, all Class A Ordinary Shares submitted for redemption will be returned to the holders thereof, and we instead may
search for an alternate Partnering Transaction.
In order to effectuate a Partnering Transaction, special purpose acquisition companies have, in the recent past, amended
various provisions of their charters and other governing instruments, including their warrant agreements. We cannot assure Public Shareholders that we will not seek to amend our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association or
governing instruments in a manner that will make it easier for us to complete our Partnering Transaction that our shareholders may not support.
In order to effectuate a Partnering Transaction, special purpose acquisition companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and
governing instruments, including their warrant agreements. For example, special purpose acquisition companies have amended the definition of Partnering Transaction, increased redemption thresholds and extended the time to consummate a Partnering
Transaction and, with respect to their warrants, amended their warrant agreements to require the warrants to be exchanged for cash and/or other securities. Amending certain provisions of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of
Association requires the approval of a special resolution, under Cayman Islands law which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of at least two-thirds of the shareholders who attend and vote at a general meeting of the company, and amending
our warrant agreement requires a vote of holders of at least 50% of the public warrants that vote on such amendment and, solely with respect to any amendment to the terms of the Private Placement Warrants or any provision of the warrant agreement
with respect to the Private Placement Warrants, 50% of the number of the then outstanding Private Placement Warrants. In addition, our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association requires us to provide our Public Shareholders with
the opportunity to redeem their Public Shares for cash if we propose an amendment to our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our Public Shares if we do
not complete a Partnering Transaction by October 6, 2023 or with respect to any other material provisions relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-Partnering Transaction activity. To the extent any of such amendments would be deemed to
fundamentally change the nature of the securities we would register, or seek an exemption from registration for, the affected securities. We may seek to amend our charter or governing instruments or extend the time to consummate a Partnering
Transaction in order to effectuate our Partnering Transaction.
The provisions of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association that relate to our pre-Partnering
Transaction activity (and corresponding provisions of the agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account) may be amended with the approval of at least two-thirds of the shareholders who attend and vote at a general meeting of the
company, which is a lower amendment threshold than that of some other special purpose acquisition companies. It may be easier for us, therefore, to amend our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association to facilitate the completion
of a Partnering Transaction that some of our shareholders may not support.
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provides that any of its provisions related to Partnering Transaction activity (including the
requirement to deposit proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the private placement of warrants into the trust account and not release such amounts except in specified circumstances, and to provide redemption rights to Public Shareholders as
described herein) may be amended if approved by special resolution, under Cayman Islands law which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of at least two-thirds of the shareholders who attend and vote at a general meeting of the company, and
corresponding provisions of the trust agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account may be amended if approved by holders of 65% of our Ordinary Shares who attend and vote at a general meeting of our company for that purpose. In
all other instances, our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association may be amended by holders of a majority of the voting power of our outstanding Ordinary Shares entitled to vote thereon, subject to applicable provisions of
applicable stock exchange rules. Our Initial Shareholders, who, with their Founder Shares and Performance Shares, will collectively hold 20% of the voting power of our Ordinary Shares prior to the completion of a Partnering Transaction, may
participate in any vote to amend our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association and/or trust agreement and will have the discretion to vote in any manner they choose. As a result, we may be able to amend the provisions of our
Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association which govern our pre-Partnering Transaction behavior more easily than some other special purpose acquisition companies, and this may increase our ability to complete a Partnering
Transaction with which Public Shareholders do not agree.
Our shareholders may pursue remedies against us for any breach of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association.
Our Sponsor, executive officers and directors have agreed, pursuant to written agreements with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our Amended and Restated
Memorandum and Articles of Association to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our Public Shares if we do not complete our Partnering Transaction by October 6, 2023 or with respect to any other material provisions
relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-Partnering Transaction activity, unless we provide our Public Shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their Class A Ordinary Shares upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in
cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account (net of Permitted Withdrawals and up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the
number of then outstanding Public Shares. Our shareholders are not parties to, or third-party beneficiaries of, these agreements and, as a result, will not have the ability to pursue remedies against our Sponsor, executive officers or directors
for any breach of these agreements. As a result, in the event of a breach, our shareholders would need to pursue a shareholder derivative action, subject to applicable law.
We may be unable to obtain additional financing to complete our Partnering Transaction or to fund the operations and growth of
a partnering candidate, which could compel us to restructure or abandon a particular Partnering Transaction. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the
trust account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
Although we believe that the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering, the sale of the Private Placement Warrants and the Forward Purchase Securities will be
sufficient to allow us to complete our Partnering Transaction, because we have not yet selected any specific partnering candidate we cannot ascertain the capital requirements for any particular transaction. If the net proceeds of our Initial
Public Offering, the sale of the Private Placement Warrants and the Forward Purchase Securities prove to be insufficient, either because of the size of our Partnering Transaction, the depletion of the available net proceeds in search of a
partnering candidate, the obligation to redeem for cash a significant number of shares from shareholders who elect redemption in connection with our Partnering Transaction the sale of the Forward Purchase Securities does not close or the terms of
negotiated transactions to purchase shares in connection with our Partnering Transaction, we may be required to seek additional financing or to abandon the proposed Partnering Transaction. We cannot assure Public Shareholders that such financing
will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. The current economic environment has made it especially difficult for companies to obtain acquisition financing. To the extent that additional financing proves to be unavailable when needed to
complete our Partnering Transaction, we would be compelled to either restructure the transaction or abandon that particular Partnering Transaction and seek an alternative partnering candidate. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our
Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless. In addition, even if we do not need additional
financing to complete our Partnering Transaction, we may require such financing to fund the operations or growth of the partnering candidate. The failure to secure additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the continued
development or growth of the partnering candidate. None of our officers, directors or shareholders is required to provide any financing to us in connection with or after our Partnering Transaction.
Our Initial Shareholders control a substantial interest in us and thus may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring
a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that our Class A ordinary shareholders do not support.
Our Initial Shareholders, with their Founder Shares and their Performance Shares, hold approximately 20% of the voting power of our Ordinary Shares prior to the
completion of a Partnering Transaction. Accordingly, they may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that our Class A ordinary shareholders do not support, including amendments to our
Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association. Further, pursuant to a Letter Agreement with our Sponsor, we have agreed not to enter into a definitive agreement regarding a Partnering Transaction without the prior written consent of
our Sponsor. As a result, we may not be permitted to enter into a Partnering Transaction that our Board believes to be in the shareholders’ best interests. Further, for so long as any Performance Shares remain outstanding, we may not, without the
prior or written consent of the holders of a majority of the Performance Shares then outstanding take certain actions such as to (i) change our fiscal year, (ii) increase the number of directors on the Board, (iii) pay any dividends or effect any
split on any of our Ordinary Shares or make any distributions of cash, securities or any other property, (iv) adopt any shareholder rights plan, (v) acquire any entity or business with assets at a purchase price greater than 10% or more of our
total assets measured in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States or the accounting standards then used by us in the preparation of our financial statements or (vi) issue any Class A Ordinary Shares in excess
of 20% of our then outstanding Class A Ordinary Shares or that would otherwise require a shareholder vote pursuant to the rules of the stock exchange on which the Class A Ordinary Shares are then listed or (vii) make a rights offering to all or
substantially all of the holders of Class B Ordinary Shares or issue additional Class B Ordinary Shares. As a result, the holders of the Performance Shares may be able to prevent us from taking such actions that the Board believes is in our
interest.
If our Initial Shareholders purchase any units in our Initial Public Offering or if our Initial Shareholders purchase any additional Class A Ordinary Shares in the
aftermarket or in privately negotiated transactions, this would increase their control. Neither our Initial Shareholders nor, to our knowledge, any of our officers or directors, have any current intention to purchase additional securities, other
than as disclosed in this Report. Factors that would be considered in making such additional purchases would include consideration of the current trading price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. In addition, our board of directors, whose members
were elected by our Sponsor, is and will be divided into three classes, each of which will generally serve for a terms for three years with only one class of directors being elected in each year. We may not hold an annual meeting of shareholders
to elect new directors prior to the completion of our Partnering Transaction, in which case all of the current directors will continue in office until at least the completion of the Partnering Transaction. If there is an annual meeting, as a
consequence of our “staggered” board of directors, only a minority of the board of directors will be considered for election and our Initial Shareholders, because of their ownership position, will have considerable influence regarding the
outcome. Accordingly, our Initial Shareholders will continue to exert control at least until the completion of our Partnering Transaction.
Because we must furnish our shareholders with partnering candidate financial statements, we may lose the ability to complete
an otherwise advantageous Partnering Transaction with some prospective partnering candidates.
The federal proxy rules require that the proxy statement with respect to the vote on a Partnering Transaction include historical and pro forma financial statement
disclosure. We will include the same financial statement disclosure in connection with our tender offer documents, whether or not they are required under the tender offer rules. These financial statements may be required to be prepared in
accordance with, or be reconciled to, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), or international financial reporting standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”), depending
on the circumstances and the historical financial statements may be required to be audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”). These financial statement requirements may
limit the pool of potential partnering candidates we may acquire because some partnering candidates may be unable to provide such financial statements in time for us to disclose such statements in accordance with federal proxy rules and complete
our Partnering Transaction within the prescribed time frame.
Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may make it more difficult for us to effectuate our Partnering
Transaction, require substantial financial and management resources, and increase the time and costs of completing a Partnering Transaction.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls beginning with this Report on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2021. Only in the event we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer or an accelerated filer, and no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, will we be required to comply with the independent registered public
accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal control over financial reporting. Further, for as long as we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm
attestation requirement on our internal control over financial reporting. The fact that we are a newly organized company established for the purpose of identifying a company to partner with in order to effectuate a merger, share exchange, asset
acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar Partnering Transaction makes compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act particularly burdensome on us as compared to other public companies because a partnering candidate with
which we seek to complete our Partnering Transaction may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of its internal controls. The development of the internal control of any such entity to achieve
compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete any such Partnering Transaction.
Provisions in our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit
the price investors might be willing to pay in the future for our Class A Ordinary Shares and could entrench management.
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association contains provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that shareholders may consider
to be in their best interests. These provisions include a staggered board of directors, the ability of the board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new classes of preference shares, and potential payments owed with respect to our
Performance Shares, which may make the removal of management more difficult and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.
If we effect our Partnering Transaction with a company located outside of the United States, we would be subject to a variety
of additional risks that may adversely affect us.
If we pursue a partnering candidate with operations or opportunities outside of the United States for our Partnering Transaction, we may face additional burdens in
connection with investigating, agreeing to and completing such Partnering Transaction, and if we effect such Partnering Transaction, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may negatively impact our operations.
If we pursue a partnering candidate with operations or opportunities outside of the United States for our Partnering Transaction, we would be subject to risks
associated with cross-border Partnering Transactions, including in connection with investigating, agreeing to and completing our Partnering Transaction, conducting due diligence in a foreign jurisdiction, having such transaction approved by any
local governments, regulators or agencies and changes in the purchase price based on fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
If we effect our Partnering Transaction with such a company, we would be subject to any special considerations or risks associated with companies operating in an
international setting, including any of the following:
|
• |
costs and difficulties inherent in managing cross-border business operations;
|
|
• |
rules and regulations regarding currency redemption;
|
|
• |
complex corporate withholding taxes on individuals;
|
|
• |
laws governing the manner in which future Partnering Transactions may be effected;
|
|
• |
exchange listing and/or delisting requirements;
|
|
• |
tariffs and trade barriers;
|
|
• |
regulations related to customs and import/export matters;
|
|
• |
local or regional economic policies and market conditions;
|
|
• |
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
• |
challenges in managing and staffing international operations;
|
|
• |
tax issues, such as tax law changes and variations in tax laws as compared to the United States;
|
|
• |
currency fluctuations and exchange controls;
|
|
• |
challenges in collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
• |
cultural and language differences;
|
|
• |
employment regulations;
|
|
• |
underdeveloped or unpredictable legal or regulatory systems;
|
|
• |
protection of intellectual property;
|
|
• |
social unrest, crime, strikes, riots and civil disturbances;
|
|
• |
regime changes and political upheaval;
|
|
• |
terrorist attacks and wars; and
|
|
• |
deterioration of political relations with the United States.
|
We may not be able to adequately address these additional risks. If we were unable to do so, we may be unable to complete such Partnering Transaction, or, if we
complete such Partnering Transaction, our operations might suffer, either of which may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A potential target’s business could be affected by political instability, including relating to Ukraine and
related sanctions or export controls imposed by the U.S., EU, UK, or other governments.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine along with the responses of the governments of the United States, EU member states, the United Kingdom, and other nations have the
potential to materially adversely affect a potential target business’s operations or assets in or (direct or indirect) dealings with parties organized or located within Ukraine, Russia, and Belarus. Due to recent geopolitical developments, the
United States, European Union, United Kingdom, and other nations have announced or threatened new sanctions and export restrictions targeting Russian and Belarusian individuals and entities, as well as disputed territories within Ukraine. Russia
and its allies may respond with countermeasures, which could further restrict the target business’s operations in or related to the foregoing countries. It is unclear how long existing restrictions (and countermeasures) will remain in place or
whether new restrictions (or countermeasures) may be imposed. Existing restrictions have negatively impacted the Russian economy, and there can be no guarantee that existing (or new) restrictions or countermeasures will not materially adversely
affect the Russian (or global) economy. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse impact on a potential target business’s financial condition, results of operations, or prospects.
Risks Relating to our Securities
The ability of our Public Shareholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares may not
allow us to complete the most desirable Partnering Transaction or optimize our capital structure.
At the time we enter into an agreement for our Partnering Transaction, we will not know how many shareholders may exercise their redemption rights, and therefore will
need to structure the transaction based on our expectations as to the number of shares that will be submitted for redemption. If our Partnering Transaction agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the trust account to pay the
purchase price, or requires us to have a minimum amount of cash at closing, we will need to reserve a portion of the cash in the trust account to meet such requirements, or arrange for third party financing. In addition, if a larger number of
shares is submitted for redemption than we initially expected, we may need to restructure the transaction to reserve a greater portion of the cash in the trust account or arrange for third party financing. Raising additional third party financing
may involve dilutive equity issuances or the incurrence of indebtedness at higher than desirable levels. The above considerations may limit our ability to complete the most desirable Partnering Transaction available to us or optimize our capital
structure.
The ability of our Public Shareholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares could
increase the probability that our Partnering Transaction would be unsuccessful and that Public Shareholders would have to wait for liquidation in order to redeem their shares.
If our Partnering Transaction agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the trust account to pay the purchase price, or requires us to have a minimum
amount of cash at closing, the probability that our Partnering Transaction would be unsuccessful is increased. If our Partnering Transaction is unsuccessful, Public Shareholders would not receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust
account until we liquidate the trust account. If Public Shareholders are in need of immediate liquidity, they could attempt to sell their shares in the open market; however, at such time our shares may trade at a discount to the pro rata amount
per share in the trust account. In either situation, Public Shareholders may suffer a material loss on their investment or lose the benefit of funds expected in connection with their exercise of redemption rights until we liquidate or they are
able to sell their shares in the open market.
If a shareholder fails to receive notice of our offer to redeem our Public Shares in connection with our Partnering
Transaction, or fails to comply with the procedures for tendering its shares, such shares may not be redeemed.
We will comply with the proxy rules or tender offer rules, as applicable, when conducting redemptions in connection with our Partnering Transaction. Despite our
compliance with these rules, if a shareholder fails to receive our proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable, such shareholder may not become aware of the opportunity to redeem its shares. In addition, proxy materials or tender
offer documents, as applicable, that we will furnish to holders of our Public Shares in connection with our Partnering Transaction will describe the various procedures that must be complied with in order to validly tender or submit Public Shares
for redemption. For example, we intend to require our Public Shareholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights, whether they are record holders or hold their shares in “street name,” to, at the holder’s option, either deliver their share
certificates to our transfer agent, or to deliver their shares to our transfer agent electronically prior to the date set forth in the proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable. In the case of proxy materials, this date may be up
to two business days prior to the date on which the vote on the proposal to approve the Partnering Transaction is to be held. In addition, if we conduct redemptions in connection with a shareholder vote, we intend to require a public shareholder
seeking redemption of its Public Shares to also submit a written request for redemption to our transfer agent two business days prior to the vote in which the name of the beneficial owner of such shares is included. In the event that a
shareholder fails to comply with these or any other procedures disclosed in the proxy or tender offer materials, as applicable, its shares may not be redeemed.
Public Shareholders will not have any rights or interests in funds from the trust account, except under certain limited
circumstances. Therefore, to liquidate their investment, Public Shareholders may be forced to sell their Public Shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.
Our Public Shareholders are entitled to receive funds from the trust account only upon the earlier to occur of: (i) our completion of a Partnering Transaction, and
then only in connection with those Class A Ordinary Shares that such shareholder properly elected to redeem, subject to the limitations described herein, (ii) the redemption of any Public Shares properly tendered in connection with a shareholder
vote to amend our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our Public Shares if we do not complete our Partnering Transaction by October 6, 2023 or with
respect to any other material provisions relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-Partnering Transaction activity, and (iii) the redemption of our Public Shares if we do not complete a Partnering Transaction by October 6, 2023, subject to
applicable law and as further described herein. In addition, if we do not complete a Partnering Transaction by October 6, 2023, Cayman Islands law may require that we submit a plan of dissolution to our then-existing shareholders for approval
prior to the distribution of the proceeds held in our trust account. In that case, Public Shareholders may be forced to wait beyond October 6, 2023 before they receive funds from our trust account. In no other circumstances will a public
shareholder have any right or interest of any kind in the trust account. Holders of warrants will not have any right to the proceeds held in the trust account with respect to the warrants. Accordingly, to liquidate their investment, they may be
forced to sell their Public Shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.
The NYSE may delist our securities from trading on its exchange, which could limit Public Shareholders’ ability to make
transactions in our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions.
Our units, Class A Ordinary Shares and warrants are currently listed on the NYSE. We cannot assure Public Shareholders that our securities will continue to be listed
on the NYSE in the future or prior to our Partnering Transaction. In order to continue listing our securities on the NYSE prior to our Partnering Transaction, we must maintain certain financial, distribution and share price levels. Generally, we
must maintain a minimum average global market capitalization and a minimum number of holders of our securities. Additionally, in connection with our Partnering Transaction, we will be required to demonstrate compliance with the NYSE’s initial
listing requirements, which are more rigorous than NYSE’s continued listing requirements, in order to continue to maintain the listing of our securities on the NYSE. For instance, our share price would generally be required to be at least $4.00
per share and our shareholder’s equity would generally be required to be at least $5.0 million. We cannot assure Public Shareholders that we will be able to meet those initial listing requirements at that time.
If the NYSE delists our securities from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, we expect our
securities could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:
|
• |
a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;
|
|
• |
reduced liquidity for our securities;
|
|
• |
a determination that our Class A Ordinary Shares are a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our Class A Ordinary Shares to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the
secondary trading market for our securities;
|
|
• |
a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and
|
|
• |
a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
|
The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities,
which are referred to as “covered securities.” Because our units, Class A Ordinary Shares and warrants are currently listed on the NYSE, our units, Class A Ordinary Shares and warrants qualify as covered securities under the statute. Although the
states are preempted from regulating the sale of our securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate companies if there is a suspicion of fraud, and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate
or bar the sale of covered securities in a particular case. While we are not aware of a state having used these powers to prohibit or restrict the sale of securities issued by blank check companies, other than the State of Idaho, certain state
securities regulators view blank check companies unfavorably and might use these powers, or threaten to use these powers, to hinder the sale of securities of blank check companies in their states. Further, if we were no longer listed on the NYSE,
our securities would not qualify as covered securities under the statute and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities.
Public Shareholders will not be entitled to protections normally afforded to investors of many other blank check companies.
Since the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants are intended to be used to complete a Partnering Transaction with
a partnering candidate that has not been selected, we may be deemed to be a “blank check” company under the United States securities laws. However, because we had net tangible assets in excess of $5,000,000 upon the completion of our Initial
Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants and we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, including an audited balance sheet demonstrating this fact, we are exempt from rules promulgated by the SEC to protect investors in blank
check companies, such as Rule 419. Accordingly, investors will not be afforded the benefits or protections of those rules. Among other things, this means we will have a longer period of time to complete our Partnering Transaction than do
companies subject to Rule 419. Moreover, if our Initial Public Offering were subject to Rule 419, that rule would prohibit the release of any interest earned on funds held in the trust account to us unless and until the funds in the trust account
were released to us in connection with our completion of a Partnering Transaction.
If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption
amount received by shareholders may be less than $10.00 per share.
Our placing of funds in the trust account may not protect those funds from third party claims against us. Although we will seek to have all vendors, service providers,
prospective partnering candidates and other entities with which we do business (other than our independent registered public accounting firm) execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies
held in the trust account for the benefit of our Public Shareholders, such parties may not execute such agreements, or even if they execute such agreements they may not be prevented from bringing claims against the trust account, including, but
not limited to, fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain advantage with respect to a claim against our assets,
including the funds held in the trust account. If any third party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in the trust account, our management will perform an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will
only enter into an agreement with a third party that has not executed a waiver if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be significantly more beneficial to us than any alternative. The underwriters of our Initial Public
Offering will not execute agreements with us waiving such claims to the monies held in the trust account.
Examples of possible instances where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third party consultant whose particular
expertise or skills are believed by management to be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver. In
addition, there is no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the trust
account for any reason. Upon redemption of our Public Shares, if we do not complete our Partnering Transaction within the prescribed timeframe, or upon the exercise of a redemption right in connection with our Partnering Transaction, we will be
required to provide for payment of claims of creditors that were not waived that may be brought against us within the 10 years following redemption.
Accordingly, the per-share redemption amount received by Public Shareholders could be less than the $10.00 per public share initially held in the trust account, due to
claims of such creditors. Pursuant to the Letter Agreement, our Sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a third party for services rendered or products sold to us, or a prospective partnering candidate
with which we have entered into a written letter of intent, confidentiality or other similar agreement or Partnering Transaction agreement, reduce the amount of funds in the trust account to below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per public share and
(ii) the actual amount per public share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account, if less than $10.00 per public share due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, less taxes payable, provided that such liability will not apply to any claims by a third party or prospective partnering candidate who executed a waiver of any and all rights to the monies held in the trust account (whether or
not such waiver is enforceable) nor will it apply to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of our Initial Public Offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
However, we have not asked our Sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations, nor have we independently verified whether our Sponsor has sufficient funds to
satisfy its indemnity obligations and we believe that our Sponsor’s only assets are securities of our company. Therefore, we cannot assure Public Shareholders that our Sponsor would be able to satisfy those obligations. As a result, if any such
claims were successfully made against the trust account, the funds available for our Partnering Transaction and redemptions could be reduced to less than $10.00 per public share. In such event, we may not be able to complete our Partnering
Transaction, and Public Shareholders would receive such lesser amount per share in connection with any redemption of their Public Shares. None of our officers or directors will indemnify us for claims by third parties including, without
limitation, claims by vendors and prospective partnering candidates.
The securities in which we invest the proceeds held in the trust account could bear a negative rate of interest, which could
reduce the interest income available for payment of taxes or reduce the value of the assets held in trust such that the per share redemption amount received by shareholders may be less than $10.00 per share.
The net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and certain proceeds from the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, in the amount of $280,950,832, are held in an
interest-bearing trust account. The proceeds held in the trust account may only be invested in direct U.S. Treasury obligations having a maturity of 185 days or less, or in certain money market funds which invest only in direct U.S. Treasury
obligations. While short-term U.S. Treasury obligations currently yield a positive rate of interest, they have briefly yielded negative interest rates in recent years. Central banks in Europe and Japan pursued interest rates below zero in recent
years, and the Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve has not ruled out the possibility that it may in the future adopt similar policies in the United States. In the event of very low or negative yields, the amount of interest income (net
of Permitted Withdrawals) would be reduced. In the event that we are unable to complete our initial Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders are entitled to receive their pro-rata share of the proceeds held in the trust account, plus any
interest income. If the balance of the trust account is reduced below $280,900,000 as a result of negative interest rates, the amount of funds in the trust account available for distribution to our Public Shareholders may be reduced below $10.00
per share.
Our directors may decide not to enforce the indemnification obligations of our Sponsor, resulting in a reduction in the amount
of funds in the trust account available for distribution to our Public Shareholders.
In the event that the proceeds in the trust account are reduced below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per share and (ii) the actual amount per public share held in the trust
account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account if less than $10.00 per public share due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case less taxes payable, and our Sponsor asserts that it is unable to satisfy its
obligations or that it has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our independent directors would determine whether to take legal action against our Sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations. While we currently
expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against our Sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business judgment and subject to
their fiduciary duties may choose not to do so in any particular instance. If our independent directors choose not to enforce these indemnification obligations, the amount of funds in the trust account available for distribution to our Public
Shareholders may be reduced below $10.00 per share.
If, after we distribute the proceeds in the trust account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up
petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, a bankruptcy or insolvency court may seek to recover such proceeds, and the members of our board of directors may be viewed as having breached
their fiduciary duties to our creditors, thereby exposing the members of our board of directors and us to claims of punitive damages.
If, after we distribute the proceeds in the trust account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or
winding-up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy or insolvency laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent
conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy or insolvency court could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our shareholders. In addition, our board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or
having acted in bad faith, by paying Public Shareholders from the trust account prior to addressing the claims of creditors, thereby exposing itself and us to claims of punitive damages.
If, before distributing the proceeds in the trust account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up
petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority over the claims of our shareholders and the per-share amount that would otherwise
be received by our shareholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.
If, before distributing the proceeds in the trust account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or
winding-up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy or insolvency law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third
parties with priority over the claims of our shareholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our shareholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.
Our shareholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against us to the extent of distributions received by them
upon redemption of their shares.
If we are forced to enter into an insolvent liquidation, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed as an unlawful payment if it was proved that
immediately following the date on which the distribution was made, we were unable to pay our debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. As a result, a liquidator could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our
shareholders. Furthermore, our directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to us or our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, thereby exposing themselves and our company to claims, by paying Public Shareholders from
the trust account prior to addressing the claims of creditors. We cannot assure Public Shareholders that claims will not be brought against us for these reasons. We and our directors and officers who knowingly and willfully authorized or
permitted any distribution to be paid out of our share premium account while we were unable to pay our debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business would be guilty of an offence and may be liable to a fine of $18,293 and to
imprisonment for five years in the Cayman Islands.
Certain agreements related to our Initial Public Offering may be amended without shareholder approval.
Each of the agreements related to our Initial Public Offering to which we are a party, other than the warrant agreement and the investment management trust agreement,
may be amended without shareholder approval. Such agreements are: the underwriting agreement; the Letter Agreement among us and our Sponsor, officers and directors; the registration and shareholder rights agreement among us and our Initial
Shareholders; the private placement warrants purchase agreement between us and our Sponsor; and the administrative services agreement among us, our Sponsor and an affiliate of our Sponsor. These agreements contain various provisions that our
Public Shareholders might deem to be material. For example, our Letter Agreement and the underwriting agreement contain certain lock-up provisions with respect to the Founder Shares, Private Placement Warrants and other securities held by our
Sponsor, officers and directors. Amendments to such agreements would require the consent of the applicable parties thereto and would need to be approved by our board of directors, which may do so for a variety of reasons, including to facilitate
our Partnering Transaction. While we do not expect our board of directors to approve any amendment to any of these agreements prior to our Partnering Transaction, it may be possible that our board of directors, in exercising its business judgment
and subject to its fiduciary duties, chooses to approve one or more amendments to any such agreement. Any amendment entered into in connection with the consummation of our Partnering Transaction will be disclosed in our proxy solicitation or
tender offer materials, as applicable, related to such Partnering Transaction, and any other material amendment to any of our material agreements will be disclosed in a filing with the SEC. Any such amendments would not require approval from our
shareholders, may result in the completion of our Partnering Transaction that may not otherwise have been possible, and may have an adverse effect on the value of an investment in our securities. For example, amendments to the lock-up provision
discussed above may result in our Initial Shareholders selling their securities earlier than they would otherwise be permitted, which may have an adverse effect on the price of our securities.
In addition, pursuant to the terms of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, the powers, preferences or relative, participating, optional or
other special rights of the Performance Shares may be amended only with the prior vote or written consent of the holders of a majority of the Performance Shares then outstanding, voting separately as a single class, without the need to seek
approval from any other class of our Ordinary Shares, even in situations where the amendment to the terms of the Performance Shares may adversely impact such other class of Ordinary Shares.
We may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner that may be adverse to holders of public warrants for amendments necessary
for the warrants to be classified as equity. As a result, the exercise price of Public Shareholders’ warrants could be increased, the exercise period could be shortened and the number of Class A Ordinary Shares purchasable upon exercise of a
warrant could be decreased, all without Public Shareholders’ approval.
Our warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us. The warrant
agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any shareholder or warrant holder for the purpose of (i) curing any ambiguity or to correct any defective provision or mistake, (ii) adjusting the provisions
relating to cash dividends on Class A Ordinary Shares as contemplated by and in accordance with the warrant agreement or (iii) adding or changing any provisions with respect to matters or questions arising under the warrant agreement as the
parties to the warrant agreement may deem necessary or desirable and that the parties deem to not adversely affect the rights of the registered holders of the warrants, provided that the approval by the
holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants that vote to amend the warrant agreement, after at least 10 days’ notice that an amendment is being sought, is required to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the
registered holders. Although our ability to amend the terms of the public warrants with such 50% consent of is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the warrants, convert
the warrants into cash or shares (at a ratio different than initially provided), shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of Class A Ordinary Shares purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.
We may redeem Public Shareholders’ unexpired warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to Public
Shareholders, thereby making their warrants worthless.
We have the ability to redeem outstanding warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, provided that the closing price of our Class A Ordinary Shares equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for share splits, share capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any
20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to proper notice of such redemption provided that on the date we give notice of redemption. We will not redeem the
warrants unless an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants is effective and a current prospectus relating to those Class A Ordinary Shares is available
throughout the 30-day redemption period, except if the warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis and such cashless exercise is exempt from registration under the Securities Act. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may
exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding warrants could force Public Shareholders to (i) exercise their
warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for them to do so, (ii) sell their warrants at the then-current market price when they might otherwise wish to hold their warrants or (iii) accept the nominal
redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of their warrants. The Forward Purchase Warrants are redeemable on the same terms as the warrants
offered as part of the units sold in our Initial Public Offering. None of the Private Placement Warrants will be redeemable by us for cash so long as they are held by their initial purchasers or their permitted transferees.
In addition, we have the ability to redeem the outstanding warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.10 per
warrant if, among other things, the Reference Value equals or exceeds $10.00 per share (as adjusted for share sub-divisions, share capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like). In such a case, the holders will be able to
exercise their warrants prior to redemption for a number of our Class A Ordinary Shares determined based on the redemption date and the fair market value of our Class A Ordinary Shares. The value received upon exercise of the warrants (1) may be
less than the value the holders would have received if they had exercised their warrants at a later time where the underlying share price is higher and (2) may not compensate the holders for the value of the warrants, including because the number
of Ordinary Shares received is capped at 0.361 of our Class A Ordinary Shares per warrant (subject to adjustment) irrespective of the remaining life of the warrants.
Our warrants may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares and make it more difficult to
effectuate our Partnering Transaction.
We issued warrants to purchase 9,363,333 Class A Ordinary Shares as part of the units offered in our Initial Public Offering and, simultaneously with the closing of
our Initial Public Offering, we issued in a private placement an aggregate of 5,412,000 Private Placement Warrants each exercisable to purchase one Class A ordinary share at $11.50 per share. We may also issue up to 3,333,333 Forward Purchase
Warrants pursuant to the Forward Purchase Agreements, if any. In addition, if our Sponsor or an affiliate of our Sponsor or certain of our officers and directors makes any working capital loans, such lender may convert those loans into up to an
additional 1,500,000 Private Placement Warrants, at the price of $1.50 per private placement warrant. To the extent we issue Class A Ordinary Shares to effectuate a business transaction, the potential for the issuance of a substantial number of
additional Class A Ordinary Shares upon exercise of these warrants could make us a less attractive acquisition vehicle to a partnering candidate. Such warrants, when exercised, will increase the number of issued and outstanding Class A Ordinary
Shares and reduce the value of the Class A Ordinary Shares issued to complete the business transaction. Therefore, our warrants may make it more difficult to effectuate a business transaction or increase the cost of acquiring the partnering
candidate.
Our warrants are accounted for as a warrant liability and were recorded at fair value upon issuance with changes in fair value
each period reported in earnings, which may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares or may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial Partnering Transaction.
Following the consummation of our Initial Public Offering and the concurrent issuance of the Private Placement Warrants to our Sponsor, we accounted for the 14,775,333
warrants issued in connection with our Initial Public Offering in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40. Such guidance provides that because our warrants do not meet the criteria for equity treatment thereunder, each warrant must
be recorded as a liability. Accordingly, we classified each of the warrants as a liability at its fair value which will be estimated using an internal valuation model. Our valuation model utilizes inputs such as assumed share prices, volatility,
discount factors and other assumptions and may not be reflective of the price at which such warrants can be settled. The impact of changes in the fair value of our warrants on our earnings may have an adverse effect on the market price of our
Class A Ordinary Shares. In addition, potential targets may seek a blank check company that does not have warrants that are accounted for as a warrant liability, which may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial Partnering
Transaction with a target business.
Because each unit contains one-third of one warrant and only a whole warrant may be exercised, the units may be worth less
than units of other special purpose acquisition companies.
Each unit contains one-third of one warrant. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, no fractional warrants will be issued upon separation of the units, and only whole
units will trade. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, we will, upon exercise, round down to the nearest whole number the number of Class A Ordinary Shares to be issued to the
warrant holder. This is different from other offerings similar to ours whose units include one share and one warrant to purchase one whole share. We have established the components of the units in this way in order to reduce the dilutive effect
of the warrants upon completion of a Partnering Transaction since the warrants will be exercisable in the aggregate for one-third of the number of shares compared to units that each contain a whole warrant to purchase one share, thus making us,
we believe, a more attractive merger partner for partnering candidates. Nevertheless, this unit structure may cause our units to be worth less than if it included a warrant to purchase one whole share.
Risks Relating to our Sponsor and Management Team
Past performance by our management team and their affiliates may not be indicative of future performance of an investment in
us.
Information regarding performance by, or businesses associated with, our management team, or businesses associated with them, is presented for informational purposes
only. Past performance by our management team is not a guarantee either (i) of success with respect to any Partnering Transaction we may consummate or (ii) that we will be able to locate a suitable candidate for our Partnering Transaction. Public
Shareholders should not rely on the historical record of the performance of our management team or businesses associated with them, as indicative of our future performance of an investment in us or the returns we will, or is likely to, generate
going forward.
We may seek Partnering Transaction opportunities in industries or sectors that may be outside of our management’s areas of
expertise.
We will consider a Partnering Transaction outside of our management’s areas of expertise if a Partnering Transaction candidate is presented to us and we determine that
such candidate offers an attractive Partnering Transaction opportunity for our company. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in any particular Partnering Transaction candidate, we cannot assure Public Shareholders
that we will adequately ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors. We also cannot assure Public Shareholders that an investment in our units will not ultimately prove to be less favorable to them in our Initial Public Offering than
a direct investment, if an opportunity were available, in a Partnering Transaction candidate.
We are dependent upon our executive officers and directors and their loss could adversely affect our ability to operate.
Our operations are dependent upon a relatively small group of individuals and, in particular, our executive officers and directors. We believe that our success depends
on the continued service of our officers and directors, at least until we have completed our Partnering Transaction. In addition, our executive officers and directors are not required to commit any specified amount of time to our affairs and,
accordingly, will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time among various business activities, including identifying potential Partnering Transactions and monitoring the related due diligence. We do not have an employment agreement
with, or key-man insurance on the life of, any of our directors or executive officers. The unexpected loss of the services of one or more of our directors or executive officers could have a detrimental effect on us.
Our ability to successfully effect our Partnering Transaction and to be successful thereafter will be dependent upon the
efforts of our key personnel, some of whom may join us following our Partnering Transaction. The loss of key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
Our ability to successfully effect our Partnering Transaction is dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel. The role of our key personnel in the partnering
candidate, however, cannot presently be ascertained. Although some of our key personnel may remain with the partnering candidate in senior management or advisory positions following our Partnering Transaction, it is likely that some or all of the
management of the partnering candidate will remain in place. While we intend to closely scrutinize any individuals we engage after our Partnering Transaction, we cannot assure Public Shareholders that our assessment of these individuals will
prove to be correct. These individuals may be unfamiliar with the requirements of operating a company regulated by the SEC, which could cause us to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar with such requirements.
Our key personnel may negotiate employment or consulting agreements with a partnering candidate in connection with a
particular Partnering Transaction, and a particular Partnering Transaction may be conditioned on the retention or resignation of such key personnel. These agreements may provide for them to receive compensation following our Partnering
Transaction and as a result, may cause them to have conflicts of interest in determining whether a particular Partnering Transaction is the most advantageous.
Our key personnel may be able to remain with our company after the completion of our Partnering Transaction only if they are able to negotiate employment or consulting
agreements in connection with the Partnering Transaction. Such negotiations would take place simultaneously with the negotiation of the Partnering Transaction and could provide for such individuals to receive compensation in the form of cash
payments and/or our securities for services they would render to us after the completion of the Partnering Transaction. Such negotiations also could make such key personnel’s retention or resignation a condition to any such agreement. The
personal and financial interests of such individuals may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a partnering candidate, subject to their fiduciary duties under Cayman Islands law.
We may have a limited ability to assess the management of a prospective partnering candidate and, as a result, may affect our
Partnering Transaction with a partnering candidate whose management may not have the skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company.
When evaluating the desirability of effecting our Partnering Transaction with a prospective partnering candidate, our ability to assess the partnering candidate’s
management may be limited due to a lack of time, resources or information. Our assessment of the capabilities of the partnering candidate’s management, therefore, may prove to be incorrect and such management may lack the skills, qualifications
or abilities we suspected. Should the partnering candidate’s management not possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to manage a public company, the operations and profitability of the post-combination business may be negatively
impacted. Accordingly, any shareholders or warrant holders who choose to remain shareholders or warrant holders following the Partnering Transaction could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such shareholders or warrant holders
are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able
to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the Partnering Transaction contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.
The officers and directors of an acquisition candidate may resign upon completion of our Partnering Transaction. The loss of a
partnering candidate’s key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
The role of an acquisition candidate’s key personnel upon the completion of our Partnering Transaction cannot be ascertained at this time. Although we contemplate that
certain members of an acquisition candidate’s management team will remain associated with the acquisition candidate following our Partnering Transaction, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not wish to
remain in place.
Our executive officers and directors will allocate their time to other businesses thereby causing conflicts of interest in
their determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs. This conflict of interest could have a negative impact on our ability to complete our Partnering Transaction.
Our executive officers and directors are not required to, and will not, commit their full time to our affairs, which may result in a conflict of interest in allocating
their time between our operations and our search for a Partnering Transaction and their other businesses. We do not intend to have any full-time employees prior to the completion of our Partnering Transaction. Each of our executive officers and
directors is engaged in several other business endeavors for which he may be entitled to substantial compensation, and our executive officers and directors are not obligated to contribute any specific number of hours per week to our affairs. Our
independent directors also serve as officers and board members for other entities. If our executive officers’ and directors’ other business affairs require them to devote substantial amounts of time to such affairs in excess of their current
commitment levels, it could limit their ability to devote time to our affairs which may have a negative impact on our ability to complete our Partnering Transaction. For a complete discussion of our executive officers’ and directors’ other
business affairs, please see “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Officers and Directors.”
Our officers and directors presently have, and any of them in the future may have, additional, fiduciary or contractual
obligations to other entities and, accordingly, may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.
Until we consummate our Partnering Transaction, we intend to engage in the business of identifying and combining with one or more businesses. Each of our officers and
directors presently has, and any of them in the future may have, additional fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities pursuant to which such officer or director is or will be required to present a Partnering Transaction opportunity
to such entity subject to their fiduciary duties under Cayman Islands law. Accordingly, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. These conflicts may not be resolved
in our favor and a potential partnering candidate may be presented to another entity prior to its presentation to us.
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law: (i) no individual serving as a
director or an officer shall have any duty, except, and to the extent expressly assumed by contract, to refrain from engaging directly or indirectly in the same or similar business activities or lines of business as us; and (ii) we renounce any
interest or expectancy in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, any potential transaction or matter which may be a corporate opportunity for any director or officer, on the one hand, and us, on the other.
For a complete discussion of our executive officers’ and directors’ business affiliations and the potential conflicts of interest that Public Shareholders should be aware of, please see
“Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Officers and Directors,” “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Conflicts of Interest”
and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.”
Our executive officers, directors, security holders and their respective affiliates may have competitive pecuniary interests
that conflict with our interests.
We have not adopted a policy that expressly prohibits our directors, executive officers, security holders or affiliates from having a direct or indirect pecuniary or
financial interest in any investment to be acquired or disposed of by us or in any transaction to which we are a party or have an interest. In fact, we may enter into a Partnering Transaction with a partnering candidate that is affiliated with
our Sponsor, our directors or executive officers, although we do not intend to do so, or we may acquire a partnering candidate through an affiliated joint acquisition with one or more affiliates of Corsair Capital and/or one or more investors in
Corsair Capital or one of its affiliates. Nor do we have a policy that expressly prohibits any such persons from engaging for their own account in business activities of the types conducted by us. Accordingly, such persons or entities may have a
conflict between their interests and ours.
The personal and financial interests of our directors and officers may influence their motivation in timely identifying and selecting a partnering candidate and
completing a Partnering Transaction. Consequently, our directors’ and officers’ discretion in identifying and selecting a suitable partnering candidate may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether the terms, conditions and timing
of a particular Partnering Transaction are appropriate and in our shareholders’ best interest. If this were the case, it would be a breach of their fiduciary duties to us as a matter of Cayman Islands law and we or our shareholders might have a
claim against such individuals for infringing on our shareholders’ rights. However, we might not ultimately be successful in any claim we may make against them for such reason.
We may engage in a Partnering Transaction with one or more partnering candidates that have relationships with entities that
may be affiliated with our Sponsor, executive officers, directors or existing holders which may raise potential conflicts of interest.
In light of the involvement of our Sponsor, executive officers and directors with other entities, we may decide to acquire one or more businesses affiliated with our
Sponsor, executive officers, directors or existing holders. Our directors also serve as officers and board members for other entities, including, without limitation, those described under “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Conflicts of Interest.” Such entities may compete with us for Partnering Transaction opportunities. Our Sponsor, officers and directors are not currently aware of any specific opportunities for us to
complete our Partnering Transaction with any entities with which they are affiliated, and there have been no substantive discussions concerning a Partnering Transaction with any such entity or entities. Although we will not be specifically
focusing on, or targeting, any transaction with any affiliated entities, we would pursue such a transaction if we determined that such affiliated entity met our criteria for a Partnering Transaction as set forth in “Business—Effecting Our Partnering Transaction” and such transaction was approved by a majority of our independent and disinterested directors. Despite our agreement to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm
or an independent accounting firm regarding the fairness to our company from a financial point of view of a Partnering Transaction with one or more domestic or international businesses affiliated with our Sponsor, executive officers, directors or
existing holders, potential conflicts of interest still may exist and, as a result, the terms of the Partnering Transaction may not be as advantageous to our Public Shareholders as they would be absent any conflicts of interest.
Moreover, we may pursue an affiliated joint acquisition opportunity with one or more affiliates of Corsair Capital and/or one or more investors in Corsair Capital or
one of its affiliates. Any such parties may co-invest with us in the partnering candidate at the time of our Partnering Transaction, or we could raise additional proceeds to complete the Partnering Transaction by issuing to such parties a class
of equity or Equity-Linked Securities. Accordingly, such persons or entities may have a conflict between their interests and ours.
Since our Sponsor, executive officers and directors will lose their entire investment in us if our Partnering Transaction is
not completed (other than with respect to Public Shares they may acquire), a conflict of interest may arise in determining whether a particular partnering candidate is appropriate for our Partnering Transaction.
On January 8, 2021, one of our affiliates purchased an aggregate of (a) 2,300,000 Founder Shares in exchange for a capital contribution of $6,250, or approximately
$0.0027 per share and (b) 120,000 Performance Shares for a capital contribution of $18,750, or approximately $0.1563 per share, and on January 21, 2021 (x) exchanged 130,000 Founder Shares on a one for one basis for Performance Shares and (y)
surrendered 157,500 Founder Shares. Such Founder Shares and Performance Shares were assigned to our Sponsor on January 28, 2021. On April 30, 2021, our Sponsor surrendered 575,000 Founder Shares for no consideration, such that as of June 30,
2021, there were 1,437,500 Founder Shares and 250,000 Performance Shares issued and outstanding. On July 15, 2021, the underwriter purchased an additional 3,090,000 Units pursuant to the partial exercise of the over-allotment option. As a result,
the Sponsor subsequently forfeited 33,000 Class F Ordinary Shares on July 15, 2021. The Founder Shares will be worthless if we do not complete a Partnering Transaction. In addition, our Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 5,412,000 Private
Placement Warrants for an aggregate purchase price of $8,118,000, or $1.50 per private placement warrant. The Private Placement Warrants will also be worthless if we do not complete our Partnering Transaction. The personal and financial interests
of our executive officers and directors may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a Partnering Transaction, completing a Partnering Transaction and influencing the operation of the business following the Partnering Transaction.
This risk may become more acute as the 24-month anniversary of the closing of our Initial Public Offering nears, which is the deadline for our completion of a Partnering Transaction.
We may be a passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,” which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences
to U.S. investors.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year (or portion thereof) that is included in the holding period of a U.S. Holder of our Class A Ordinary Shares or warrants, the U.S.
Holder may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences and may be subject to additional reporting requirements. Our PFIC status for our current and subsequent taxable years may depend on whether we qualify for the PFIC start-up
exception. Depending on the particular circumstances the application of the start-up exception may be subject to uncertainty, and there cannot be any assurance that we will qualify for the start-up exception. Accordingly, there can be no
assurances with respect to our status as a PFIC for our current taxable year or any subsequent taxable year. Our actual PFIC status for any taxable year, however, will not be determinable until after the end of such taxable year (and, in the case
of the start-up exception, potentially not until after the two taxable years following our current taxable year). If we determine we are a PFIC for any taxable year, we expect to provide to a U.S. Holder such information as the Internal Revenue
Service (the “IRS”) may require, including a PFIC Annual Information Statement, in order to enable the U.S. Holder to make and maintain a “qualified electing fund” election, but there can be no assurance that we will provide such required
information on a timely basis or at all, and such election would be unavailable with respect to our warrants in all cases. We urge U.S. investors to consult their tax advisers regarding the possible application of the PFIC rules.
Public Shareholders may be treated as receiving taxable constructive distributions for U.S. federal income tax purposes even
though they do not receive a corresponding cash distribution. In addition, in the event we complete our Partnering Transaction with a U.S. company and certain other conditions are met, non-U.S. investors may be subject to withholding taxes, and
we may have withholding obligations, with respect to any such constructive distribution.
The terms of the warrants provide for an adjustment to the number of Class A Ordinary Shares for which warrants may be exercised or to the exercise price of the
warrants in certain events. When certain adjustments are made, depending on the circumstances, Public Shareholders may be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as receiving a constructive distribution from us even though no cash
distributions are made. In addition, it is possible that the conversion of Performance Shares into Class A Ordinary Shares could similarly result in a constructive distribution to Public Shareholders.
Moreover, if we complete our Partnering Transaction with a U.S. company and certain other conditions are met, non-U.S. investors may be subject to U.S. federal
withholding tax in respect of any such constructive distribution with respect to our warrants or shares, and we or another withholding agent may be liable for any failure to withhold and remit any tax due to the appropriate taxing authority, even
though no contemporaneous cash distributions are made.
General Risk Factors
If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to institute burdensome
compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted, which may make it difficult for us to complete our Partnering Transaction.
If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, our activities may be restricted, including:
|
• |
restrictions on the nature of our investments; and
|
|
• |
restrictions on the issuance of securities,
|
each of which may make it difficult for us to complete our Partnering Transaction. In addition, we may have imposed upon us burdensome requirements, including:
|
• |
registration as an investment company with the SEC;
|
|
• |
adoption of a specific form of corporate structure; and
|
|
• |
reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements and other rules and regulations that we are not subject to.
|
In order not to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, unless we can qualify for an exclusion, we must ensure that we are engaged
primarily in a business other than investing, reinvesting or trading of securities and that our activities do not include investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading “investment securities” constituting more than 40% of our assets
(exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Our business will be to identify and complete a Partnering Transaction and thereafter to operate the post-transaction business or assets for the long term. We do
not plan to buy businesses or assets with a view to resale or profit from their resale. We do not plan to buy unrelated businesses or assets or to be a passive investor.
We do not believe that our anticipated principal activities will subject us to the Investment Company Act. To this end, the proceeds held in the trust account may only
be invested in United States “government securities” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act having a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under
the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations. Pursuant to the trust agreement, the trustee is not permitted to invest in other securities or assets. By restricting the investment of the proceeds to
these instruments, and by having a business plan targeted at acquiring and growing businesses for the long term (rather than on buying and selling businesses in the manner of a merchant bank or private equity fund), we intend to avoid being
deemed an “investment company” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act. Our Initial Public Offering was not intended for persons who are seeking a return on investments in government securities or investment securities. The trust account
is intended as a holding place for funds pending the earliest to occur of either: (i) the completion of our Partnering Transaction; (ii) the redemption of any Public Shares properly tendered in connection with a shareholder vote to amend our
Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our Public Shares if we do not complete our Partnering Transaction by October 6, 2023; and (iii) absent a Partnering
Transaction by October 6, 2023 or with respect to any other material provisions relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-Partnering Transaction activity, our return of the funds held in the trust account to our Public Shareholders as part of our
redemption of the Public Shares. If we do not invest the proceeds as discussed above, we may be deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act. If we were deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act, compliance with these additional
regulatory burdens would require additional expenses for which we have not allotted funds and may hinder our ability to complete a Partnering Transaction. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may only receive
their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
Changes in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely affect our business,
including our ability to negotiate and complete our Partnering Transaction, and results of operations.
We are subject to laws and regulations enacted by national, regional and local governments. In particular, we will be required to comply with certain SEC and other
legal requirements. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws and regulations may be difficult, time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and application may also change from time to time and those
changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and applied, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, including our ability to negotiate and complete our Partnering Transaction, and results of operations.
We are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent accounting or investment banking firm, and consequently, Public
Shareholders may have no assurance from an independent source that the price we are paying for the business is fair to our shareholders from a financial point of view.
Unless we complete our Partnering Transaction with an affiliated entity, we are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent accounting firm or independent
investment banking firm that the price we are paying is fair to our shareholders from a financial point of view. If no opinion is obtained, our shareholders will be relying on the judgment of our board of directors, who will determine fair market
value based on standards generally accepted by the financial community. Such standards used will be disclosed in our proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, related to our Partnering Transaction.
We are an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take
advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our
performance with other public companies.
We are an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various
reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor internal controls attestation requirements of Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and
shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years, although
circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of our Class A Ordinary Shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 before that time, in which case we would no longer be an emerging
growth company as of the following December 31. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our
reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until
private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial
accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. We
have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or
revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which
has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
Additionally, we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain reduced
disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which (1) the market value of our Class A
Ordinary Shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $250 million as of the prior June 30th, or (2) our annual revenues exceeded $100 million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our Class A Ordinary Shares held by non-affiliates
exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th. To the extent we take advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison of our financial statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.
Because we are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, Public Shareholders may face difficulties in protecting
their interests, and their ability to protect their rights through the U.S. Federal courts may be limited.
We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. As a result, it may be difficult for Public Shareholders to effect service of process
within the United States upon our directors or officers, or enforce judgments obtained in the United States courts against our directors or officers.
Our corporate affairs will be governed by our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, the Companies Act (as the same may be supplemented or
amended from time to time) and the common law of the Cayman Islands. We will also be subject to the federal securities laws of the United States. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders
and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial
precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities
of our directors under Cayman Islands law are different from what they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different body of securities laws as compared
to the United States, and certain states, such as Delaware, may have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholders derivative action
in a Federal court of the United States.
We have been advised by Maples and Calder (Cayman) LLP, our Cayman Islands legal counsel, that the courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely (i) to recognize or
enforce against us judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state; and (ii) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, to impose
liabilities against us predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state, so far as the liabilities imposed by those provisions are penal in nature. In those circumstances, although
there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, the courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce a foreign money judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without retrial
on the merits based on the principle that a judgment of a competent foreign court imposes upon the judgment debtor an obligation to pay the sum for which judgment has been given provided certain conditions are met. For a foreign judgment to be
enforced in the Cayman Islands, such judgment must be final and conclusive and for a liquidated sum, and must not be in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same matter, impeachable
on the grounds of fraud or obtained in a manner, or be of a kind the enforcement of which is, contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands (awards of punitive or multiple damages may well be held to be contrary to public
policy). A Cayman Islands Court may stay enforcement proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.
As a result of all of the above, Public Shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the
board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as Public Shareholders of a United States company.
Cyber incidents or attacks directed at us could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or
financial loss.
We depend on digital technologies, including information systems, infrastructure and cloud applications and services, including those of third parties with which we
may deal. Sophisticated and deliberate attacks on, or security breaches in, our systems or infrastructure, or the systems or infrastructure of third parties or the cloud, could lead to corruption or misappropriation of our assets, proprietary
information and sensitive or confidential data. As an early stage company without significant investments in data security protection, we may not be sufficiently protected against such occurrences. We may not have sufficient resources to
adequately protect against, or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to, cyber incidents. It is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them, could have adverse consequences on our business and lead to financial loss.
We are a company with no operating history and no revenues established for the purpose of identifying a company to partner
with in order to effectuate a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar Partnering Transaction, and Public Shareholders have no basis on which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective.
We are a blank check company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands and all of our activities to date have been related to our formation, our Initial Public
Offering and our search for a business combination target. Because we lack an operating history, Public Shareholders have no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective of completing our initial business
combination. If we fail to complete our initial business combination, we will never generate any operating revenues.
We may reincorporate in another jurisdiction in connection with our Partnering Transaction, and the laws of such jurisdiction
may govern some or all of our future material agreements and we may not be able to enforce our legal rights.
In connection with our Partnering Transaction, we may relocate the home jurisdiction of our business from the Cayman Islands to another jurisdiction. If we determine
to do this, the laws of such jurisdiction may govern some or all of our future material agreements. The system of laws and the enforcement of existing laws in such jurisdiction may not be as certain in implementation and interpretation as in the
United States. The inability to enforce or obtain a remedy under any of our future agreements could result in a significant loss of business, business opportunities or capital.
We employ a mail forwarding service, which may delay or disrupt our ability to receive mail in a timely manner.
Mail addressed to the Company and received at its registered office will be forwarded unopened to the forwarding address supplied by Company to be dealt with. None of
the Company, its directors, officers, advisors or service providers (including the organization which provides registered office services in the Cayman Islands) will bear any responsibility for any delay howsoever caused in mail reaching the
forwarding address, which may impair Public Shareholders’ ability to communicate with us.
We identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2021. If we are unable to develop and maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner,
which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2021. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that during the period covered by this Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective as of December 31, 2021, because of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that
there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis.
Specifically, the Company’s management concluded that our control around the interpretation and accounting for certain
complex equity instruments issued by the Company was not effectively designed or maintained. This material weakness resulted in the restatement of the Company’s balance sheet as of July 6, 2021 for the period ended September 30, 2021.
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. We continue to
evaluate steps to remediate the material weakness. These remediation measures may be time consuming and costly and there is no assurance that these initiatives will ultimately have the intended effects. If we identify any new material
weaknesses in the future, any such newly identified material weakness could limit our ability to prevent or detect a misstatement of our accounts or disclosures that could result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial
statements. In such case, we may be unable to maintain compliance with securities law requirements regarding timely filing of periodic reports in addition to applicable stock exchange listing requirements, investors may lose confidence in our
financial reporting and our stock price may decline as a result. We cannot assure Public Shareholders that the measures we have taken to date, or any measures we may take in the future, will be sufficient to avoid potential future material
weaknesses.