An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. Public Shareholders should consider carefully all of the risks described below, together with the other information contained in this Report, before
making a decision to invest in our units. If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition and operating results may be materially adversely affected. In that event, the trading price of our securities could decline, and
Public Shareholders could lose all or part of their investment.
Risks Relating to our Search for, and Consummation of or Inability to Consummate, a Partnering Transaction
Our shareholders may not be afforded an opportunity to vote on our proposed Partnering Transaction, which means we may complete our Partnering Transaction even though a
majority of our shareholders do not support such a transaction.
We may choose not to hold a shareholder vote to approve our Partnering Transaction if the Partnering Transaction would not require shareholder approval under applicable law or stock exchange listing requirements.
Except for as required by applicable law or stock exchange requirements, the decision as to whether we will seek shareholder approval of a proposed Partnering Transaction or will allow shareholders to sell their shares to us in a tender offer
will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors, such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise require us to seek shareholder approval. Accordingly, we may
complete our Partnering Transaction even if holders of a majority of our Ordinary Shares do not approve of the Partnering Transaction we complete.
Our Public Shareholders’ only opportunity to affect the investment decision regarding a potential Partnering Transaction may be limited to the exercise of their right to
redeem their shares from us for cash.
Our Public Shareholders will not be provided with an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of our Partnering Transaction. Since our board of directors may complete a Partnering Transaction without
seeking shareholder approval, Public Shareholders may not have the right or opportunity to vote on the Partnering Transaction, unless we seek such shareholder vote. Accordingly, our Public Shareholders’ only opportunity to affect the investment
decision regarding our Partnering Transaction may be limited to exercising their redemption rights within the period of time (which will be at least 20 business days) set forth in our tender offer documents mailed to them in which we describe our
Partnering Transaction.
If we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction, our Initial Shareholders and management team have agreed to vote in favor of such Partnering Transaction,
regardless of how our Public Shareholders vote.
Our Initial Shareholders hold 20% of the outstanding voting power of our Ordinary Shares (not including the Forward Purchase Shares). Our Initial Shareholders and management team also may from time to time purchase
Class A Ordinary Shares prior to our Partnering Transaction. Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provides that, if we seek shareholder approval of a Partnering Transaction, such Partnering Transaction will be approved
if we receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares voted at such meeting, including the Founder Shares and the Performance Shares. As a result, in addition to the Founder Shares and Performance Shares, we would need 12,640,500, or
45%, of the 28,090,000 Public Shares sold in our Initial Public Offering to be voted in favor of a Partnering Transaction in order to have our Partnering Transaction approved (assuming all outstanding shares are voted). Accordingly, if we seek
shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction, the agreement by our Initial Shareholders and management team to vote in favor of our Partnering Transaction will increase the likelihood that we will receive the requisite shareholder approval
for such Partnering Transaction.
The ability of our Public Shareholders to redeem their shares for cash may make our financial condition unattractive to a potential partnering candidate, which may make it
difficult for us to enter into a Partnering Transaction with a partnering candidate.
We may seek to enter into a Partnering Transaction agreement with a prospective partnering candidate that requires as a closing condition that we have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. If too many
Public Shareholders exercise their redemption rights, we would not be able to meet such closing condition and, as a result, would not be able to proceed with the Partnering Transaction. Furthermore, in no event will we redeem our Public Shares in
an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001. Consequently, if accepting all properly submitted redemption requests would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 or make us unable to satisfy a
minimum cash condition as described above, we would not proceed with such redemption and the related Partnering Transaction and may instead search for an alternate Partnering Transaction.
Prospective partnering candidates will be aware of these risks and, thus, may be reluctant to enter into a Partnering Transaction with us.
In evaluating a prospective target business for our initial Partnering Transaction, our management may rely on the availability of all of the funds from the sale of the
Forward Purchase Securities to be used as part of the consideration to the sellers in the initial Partnering Transaction. If the sale of the Forward Purchase Securities does not close, we may lack sufficient funds to consummate our initial
Partnering Transaction.
On June 30, 2021, we entered into a Forward Purchase Agreement with an affiliate of our Sponsor, Corsair V Financial Services Capital Partners, L.P., pursuant to which such investor committed to purchase in the
aggregate, up to 10,000,000 units, with each unit consisting of one Class A ordinary share and one-third of one warrant to purchase one Class A ordinary share at $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment, at a purchase price of $10.00 per unit, in
private placements to occur concurrently, and only in connection with, the closing of our initial Partnering Transaction. The obligations of the investor under the Forward Purchase Agreement will not depend on whether any Class A Ordinary Shares
are redeemed by our Public Shareholders. The obligations of such investor to purchase the Forward Purchase Securities are subject to the approval, prior to our entering into a definitive agreement for our initial Partnering Transaction, of its
investment committee and the Forward Purchase Agreement contains customary closing conditions. However, if the sale of the Forward Purchase Securities does not close, we may lack sufficient funds to consummate
our initial Partnering Transaction.
The requirement that we complete our Partnering Transaction by July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable, or such later date as approved by holders of a majority of the
voting power of our outstanding Ordinary Shares that are voted at a meeting to extend such date, voting together as a single class) may give potential partnering candidates leverage over us in negotiating a Partnering Transaction and may limit
the time we have in which to conduct due diligence on potential Partnering Transaction candidates, in particular as we approach our dissolution deadline, which could undermine our ability to complete our Partnering Transaction on terms that would
produce value for our shareholders.
Any potential partnering candidate with which we enter into negotiations concerning a Partnering Transaction will be aware that we must complete our Partnering Transaction by July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as
applicable). Consequently, such partnering candidate may obtain leverage over us in negotiating a Partnering Transaction, knowing that if we do not complete our Partnering Transaction with that particular partnering candidate, we may be unable to
complete our Partnering Transaction with any partnering candidate. This risk will increase as we get closer to the timeframe described above. In addition, we may have limited time to conduct due diligence and may enter into our Partnering
Transaction on terms that we would have rejected upon a more comprehensive investigation.
Our search for a Partnering Transaction, and any partnering candidate with which we ultimately consummate a Partnering Transaction, may be materially adversely affected by the
coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and volatility of debt and equity markets.
While COVID-19 cases have recently waned, if there is a resurgence of COVID-19 or the occurrence of other significant global events (such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters or a significant outbreak of other
infectious diseases), we may be unable to complete a Partnering Transaction. We may experience restricted travel, limited ability to have meetings with potential investors or target company personnel, or vendors and services providers may be
unavailable to negotiate and consummate a Partnering Transaction in a timely manner.
In addition, our ability to consummate a Partnering Transaction may be dependent on the ability to raise equity and debt financing, which may be impacted by a resurgence of COVID-19 and other events (such as
terrorist attacks, natural disasters or a significant outbreak of other infectious diseases), including as a result of increased market volatility, decreased market liquidity and third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable to us
or at all.
If the disruptions posed by COVID-19 or other matters of global concern re-emerge for an extended period, our ability to consummate a Partnering Transaction, or the operations of a partnering candidate with which we
ultimately consummate a Partnering Transaction, may be materially adversely affected.
We may not be able to complete our Partnering Transaction by July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable), in which case we would cease all operations except for the
purpose of winding up and we would redeem our Public Shares and liquidate.
We may not be able to find a suitable partnering candidate and complete our Partnering Transaction by July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable). Our ability to complete our Partnering Transaction may be
negatively impacted by general market conditions, volatility in the capital and debt markets, rising interest rates and the other risks described herein. For example, the outbreak of COVID-19 and its variants spread both in the U.S. and globally
and, while the continued impact of the outbreak on us will depend on future developments, it could limit our ability to complete our Partnering Transaction, including as a result of increased market volatility, decreased market liquidity and
third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable to us or at all. Additionally, the outbreak of COVID-19 and its variants may negatively impact businesses we may seek to acquire. In addition, the U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit
concerns have increased the possibility of credit-rating downgrades and economic slowdowns, or a recession in the United States.
If we have not completed our Partnering Transaction within such time period, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten
business days thereafter, redeem the Public Shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account (net of Permitted
Withdrawals and up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding Public Shares, which redemption will completely extinguish Public Shareholders’ rights as shareholders (including the right to
receive further liquidating distributions, if any), and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining shareholders and our board of directors, liquidate and dissolve, subject in each
case, to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. If we are required to wind-up, liquidate the trust account and distribute such amount therein, pro rata, to our
Public Shareholders, as part of any liquidation process, such winding up, liquidation and distribution must comply with the applicable provisions of the Companies Act. In that case, Public Shareholders may be forced to wait beyond July 6, 2023
(or October 6, 2023, as applicable) before the redemption proceeds of our trust account become available to them, and they receive the return of their pro rata portion of the funds from our trust account. We have no obligation to return funds to
Public Shareholders prior to the date of our redemption or liquidation unless we consummate our Partnering Transaction prior thereto and only then in cases where Public Shareholders have sought to redeem their Class A Ordinary Shares. Only upon
our redemption or any liquidation will Public Shareholders be entitled to distributions if we are unable to complete our Partnering Transaction.
We currently maintain all of our working capital cash and cash equivalents with one financial institution and, therefore, our cash and cash equivalents could be adversely
affected if the financial institution in which we hold our cash and cash equivalents fails.
We currently maintain all of our working capital cash and cash equivalents with one financial institution. At the current time, our cash balance with such financial institution is below the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation insurance (“FDIC Insurance”) limit. As a result of the recent inability of certain businesses with accounts at Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) to gain access to their deposits and the greater focus on the concerns of potential failures of
other financial institutions, in the future, we may consider diversifying a portion of our cash and cash equivalents with other financial institutions in order to reduce the risks associated with maintaining all of our cash and cash equivalents
at one financial institution. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the failure of one or more of the financial institutions in which our cash and cash equivalents are held, the resulting inability for us to obtain the return of our funds from any of
those financial institutions, or any other adverse condition suffered by any of those financial institutions, could impact access to our cash or cash equivalents and could adversely impact our operating liquidity and financial performance.
Adverse developments affecting the financial services industry, such as actual events or concerns involving liquidity, defaults or non-performance by financial institutions,
could adversely affect our ability to consummate a partnering transaction.
Actual events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services
industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. For example, on March 10, 2023,
SVB was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) as receiver. Similarly, on March 12, 2023, Signature Bank and Silvergate Capital Corp. were
each swept into receivership. While the U.S. Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury Department, and the FDIC have agreed to guarantee all deposits, above and beyond the limit on insured deposits of $250,000, at these banks, including SVB, there can
be no assurance that there will not be additional bank failures or issues in the broader U.S. financial system, which may have an impact on the broader capital markets and, in turn, our ability to access those markets in connection with any
potential partnering transaction, as well as our search for a potential partnering candidate.
If we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction, our Sponsor, Initial Shareholders, directors, executive officers, advisors and their affiliates may elect to
purchase shares or public warrants from Public Shareholders, which may influence a vote on a proposed Partnering Transaction and reduce the public “float” of our Class A Ordinary Shares.
If we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our Partnering Transaction pursuant to the tender offer rules, our Sponsor, Initial Shareholders,
directors, executive officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase shares or public warrants in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market either prior to or following the completion of our Partnering Transaction, although they
are under no obligation to do so. However, other than as expressly stated herein, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions and have not formulated any terms or conditions for any such transactions. None
of the funds in the trust account will be used to purchase shares or public warrants in such transactions.
In the event that our Sponsor, Initial Shareholders, directors, executive officers, advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from Public Shareholders who have already elected
to exercise their redemption rights, such selling shareholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. The purpose of any such purchase of shares could be to vote such shares in favor of the Partnering
Transaction and thereby increase the likelihood of obtaining shareholder approval of the Partnering Transaction or to satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a partnering candidate that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a
certain amount of cash at the closing of our Partnering Transaction, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. The purpose of any such purchase of public warrants could be to reduce the number of public warrants
outstanding or to vote such warrants on any matters submitted to the warrantholders for approval in connection with our Partnering Transaction. Any such purchase of our securities may result in the completion of our Partnering Transaction that
may not otherwise have been possible. We expect any such purchase will be reported pursuant to Section 13 and Section 16 of the Exchange Act to the extent such purchasers are subject to such reporting requirements.
In addition, if such purchases are made, the public “float” of our Class A Ordinary Shares or public warrants and the number of beneficial holders of our securities may be reduced, possibly making it difficult to
obtain or maintain the quotation, listing or trading of our securities on a national securities exchange.
If we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction and we do not conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, and if any individual Public Shareholders
or a “group” of shareholders are deemed to hold in excess of 15% of our Class A Ordinary Shares, such Public Shareholders will lose the ability to redeem all such shares in excess of 15% of our Class A Ordinary Shares.
If we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our Partnering Transaction pursuant to the tender offer rules, our Amended and Restated Memorandum
and Articles of Association provides that a public shareholder, together with any affiliate of such shareholder or any other person with whom such shareholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act),
will be restricted from seeking redemption rights with respect to more than an aggregate of 15% of the shares sold in our Initial Public Offering without our prior consent, which we refer to as the “Excess Shares.” However, we would not be
restricting our shareholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including Excess Shares) for or against our Partnering Transaction. Public Shareholders’ inability to redeem the Excess Shares will reduce their influence over our ability to
complete our Partnering Transaction and Public Shareholders could suffer a material loss on their investment in us if they sell Excess Shares in open market transactions. Additionally, Public Shareholders will not receive redemption distributions
with respect to the Excess Shares if we complete our Partnering Transaction. And as a result, Public Shareholders will continue to hold that number of shares exceeding 15% and, in order to dispose of such shares, would be required to sell their
shares in open market transactions, potentially at a loss.
Because of our limited resources and the significant competition for Partnering Transaction opportunities, it may be more difficult for us to complete our Partnering
Transaction. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will
expire worthless.
We expect to encounter competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including private investors (which may be individuals or investment partnerships), other blank check companies and
other entities, domestic and international, competing for the types of businesses we intend to acquire. Many of these individuals and entities are well-established and have extensive experience in identifying and effecting, directly or
indirectly, acquisitions of companies operating in or providing services to various industries. Many of these competitors possess similar or greater technical, human and other resources to ours or more local industry knowledge than we do and our
financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe there are numerous partnering candidates we could potentially acquire with the cash held in our trust account, our ability to
compete with respect to the acquisition of certain partnering candidates that are sizable will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain
partnering candidates. Furthermore, we are obligated to offer holders of our Public Shares the right to redeem their shares for cash at the time of our Partnering Transaction in conjunction with a shareholder vote or via a tender offer.
Partnering candidates will be aware that this may reduce the resources available to us for our Partnering Transaction. Any of these obligations may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a Partnering Transaction. If we
do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
If the cash held outside the trust account is insufficient to allow us to operate for at least until July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable), it could limit the
amount available to fund our search for a partnering candidate or candidates and complete our Partnering Transaction, and we will depend on loans from our Sponsor or management team to fund our search and to complete our Partnering Transaction.
As of December 31, 2022, we had approximately $307,000 in cash held outside the trust account to fund our working capital requirements. We believe that the funds available to us outside of the trust account are
sufficient to allow us to operate for at least until July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable); however, we cannot assure Public Shareholders that our estimate is accurate. We could use a portion of the funds available to us to pay fees to
consultants to assist us with our search for a partnering candidate. We could also use a portion of the funds as a down payment or to fund a no-shop provision (a provision in letters of intent or merger agreements designed to keep partnering
candidates from shopping around for transactions with other companies or investors on terms more favorable to such partnering candidates) with respect to a particular proposed Partnering Transaction, although we do not have any current intention
to do so. If we entered into a letter of intent or merger agreement where we paid for the right to receive exclusivity from a partnering candidate and were subsequently required to forfeit such funds (whether as a result of our breach or
otherwise), we might not have sufficient funds to continue searching for, or conduct due diligence with respect to, a partnering candidate.
If we are required to seek additional capital, we would need to borrow funds from our Sponsor, management team or other third parties to operate or may be forced to liquidate. Neither our Sponsor, members of our
management team nor any of their affiliates is under any obligation to advance funds to us in such circumstances. Any such advances would be repaid only from funds held outside the trust account or from funds released to us upon completion of our
Partnering Transaction. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into Private Placement Warrants of the post-Partnering Transaction entity at a price of $1.50 per private placement warrant at the option of the lender. The warrants would
be identical to the Private Placement Warrants. Prior to the completion of our Partnering Transaction, we do not expect to seek loans from parties other than our Sponsor or an affiliate of our Sponsor as we do not believe third parties will be
willing to loan such funds and provide a waiver against any and all rights to seek access to funds in our trust account. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction because we do not have sufficient funds available to us, we will be forced
to cease operations and liquidate the trust account. Consequently, our Public Shareholders may only receive an estimated $10.00 per share, or possibly less, on our redemption of our Public Shares, and our warrants will expire worthless.
There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
In connection with the assessment of going concern considerations in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic 205-40, “Presentation of Financial
Statements—Going Concern,” we have until July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable) to consummate a Partnering Transaction. It is uncertain that we will be able to consummate a Partnering Transaction by this time. If a Partnering
Transaction is not consummated by this date, or we have not executed a letter of intent, agreement in principle or definitive agreement for a Partnering Transaction by such date (and subsequently extended such deadline to October 6, 2023),
there will be a mandatory liquidation and subsequent dissolution of the Company. We have determined that the liquidity condition and mandatory liquidation, should a Partnering Transaction not occur, and potential subsequent dissolution raises
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. No adjustments have been made to the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities should we be required to liquidate after July 6, 2023. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Going Concern and Capital Resources.”
Subsequent to the completion of our Partnering Transaction, we may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have
a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and the price of our securities, which could cause Public Shareholders to lose some or all of their investment.
Even if we conduct extensive due diligence on a partnering candidate with which we combine, we cannot assure Public Shareholders that this diligence will identify all material issues that may be present with a
particular partnering candidate, that it would be possible to uncover all material issues through a customary amount of due diligence, or that factors outside of the partnering candidate and outside of our control will not later arise. As a
result of these factors, we may be forced to later write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our reporting losses. Even if our due diligence successfully identifies
certain risks, unexpected risks may arise and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity,
the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth or other covenants to which we may be subject as a
result of assuming pre-existing debt held by a partnering candidate or by virtue of our obtaining debt financing to partially finance the Partnering Transaction or thereafter. Accordingly, any shareholders or warrant holders who choose to remain
shareholders or warrant holders following the Partnering Transaction could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such shareholders or warrant holders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they are able to
successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws that the proxy
solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the Partnering Transaction contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.
We may not hold an annual general meeting until after the consummation of our Partnering Transaction, which could delay the opportunity for our shareholders to appoint
directors.
In accordance with the NYSE’s corporate governance requirements, we are not required to hold an annual general meeting until no later than one year after our first fiscal year end following our listing on the NYSE.
There is no requirement under the Companies Act for us to hold annual or extraordinary general meetings to appoint directors. Until we hold an annual general meeting, Public Shareholders may not be afforded the opportunity to appoint directors
and to discuss company affairs with management. Our board of directors is divided into three classes with only one class of directors being appointed in each year and each class (except for those directors appointed prior to our first general
meeting) serving a three-year term. In addition, as holders of our Class A Ordinary Shares, our Public Shareholders will not have the right to vote on the appointment of directors until after the consummation of our Partnering Transaction. Only
holders of Founder Shares will have the right to appoint directors in any general meeting held prior to or in connection with the completion of our Partnering Transaction.
Public Shareholders will not be permitted to exercise their warrants unless we register and qualify the underlying Class A Ordinary Shares or certain exemptions are available.
If the issuance of the Class A Ordinary Shares upon exercise of the warrants is not registered, qualified or exempt from registration or qualification under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws,
holders of warrants will not be entitled to exercise such warrants and such warrants may have no value and expire worthless. In such event, holders who acquired their warrants as part of a purchase of units will have paid the full units purchase
price solely for the Class A Ordinary Shares included in the units.
We have not registered, and do not intend to register the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act or any state securities laws at this time. However, under the terms of
the warrant agreement, we have agreed that, as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 15 business days, after the closing of our Partnering Transaction, we will use our commercially reasonable efforts to file with the SEC a
post-effective amendment to the registration statement covering the registration under the Securities Act of the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants and thereafter will use our commercially reasonable efforts to cause
the same to become effective within 60 business days following our Partnering Transaction and to maintain a current prospectus relating to the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants until the expiration of the warrants in
accordance with the provisions of the warrant agreement.
We cannot assure Public Shareholders that we will be able to do so if, for example, any facts or events arise which represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement or
prospectus, the financial statements contained or incorporated by reference therein are not current or correct or the SEC issues a stop order.
If the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act, under the terms of the warrant agreement, holders of warrants who seek to exercise their warrants
will not be permitted to do so for cash and, instead, will be required to do so on a cashless basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act or another exemption.
In no event will warrants be exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis, and we will not be obligated to issue any shares to holders seeking to exercise their warrants, unless the issuance of the shares upon such
exercise is registered or qualified under the securities laws of the state of the exercising holder, or an exemption from registration or qualification is available.
If our Class A Ordinary Shares are at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of “covered securities” under Section 18(b)(1) of the
Securities Act, we may, at our option, not permit holders of warrants who seek to exercise their warrants to do so for cash and, instead, require them to do so on a cashless basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act; in the
event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement or register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under applicable state securities laws, and in the event we do not so elect, we will use
our commercially reasonable efforts to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under applicable state securities laws to the extent an exemption is not available.
In no event will we be required to net cash settle any warrant, or issue securities (other than upon a cashless exercise as described above) or other compensation in exchange for the warrants in the event that we are
unable to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under the Securities Act or applicable state securities laws.
Public Shareholders may only be able to exercise their public warrants on a “cashless basis” under certain circumstances, and if they do so, they will receive fewer Class A
Ordinary Shares from such exercise than if they were to exercise such warrants for cash.
The warrant agreement provides that in the following circumstances holders of warrants who seek to exercise their warrants will not be permitted to do for cash and will, instead, be required to do so on a cashless
basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act: (i) if the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act in accordance with the terms of the warrant agreement; (ii) if
we have so elected and the Class A Ordinary Shares is at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of “covered securities” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities
Act; and (iii) if we have so elected and we call the public warrants for redemption. If Public Shareholders exercise their public warrants on a cashless basis, they would pay the warrant exercise price by surrendering the warrants for that number
of Class A Ordinary Shares equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of Class A Ordinary Shares underlying the warrants, multiplied by the excess of the “fair market value” of our Class A Ordinary Shares (as defined
in the next sentence) over the exercise price of the warrants by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value” is the average reported closing price of the Class A Ordinary Shares for the 10 trading days ending on the third trading day prior
to the date on which the notice of exercise is received by the warrant agent or on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of warrants, as applicable. In no event will the warrants be exercisable in connection with this redemption
feature for more than 0.361 Class A Ordinary Shares per warrant (subject to adjustment). As a result, Public Shareholders would receive fewer Class A Ordinary Shares from such exercise than if they were to exercise such warrants for cash.
Our ability to require holders of our warrants to exercise such warrants on a cashless basis after we call the warrants for redemption or if there is no effective registration
statement covering the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of these warrants will cause holders to receive fewer Class A Ordinary Shares upon their exercise of the warrants than they would have received had they been able to pay the
exercise price of their warrants in cash.
If we call the warrants for redemption, holders will have the option to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis under certain circumstances. If holders choose to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis, the
number of Class A Ordinary Shares received by a holder upon exercise will be fewer than it would have been had such holder exercised his or her warrant for cash. For example, if the holder is exercising 875 public warrants at $11.50 per share
through a cashless exercise when the Class A Ordinary Shares have a fair market value of $17.50 per share when there is no effective registration statement, then upon the cashless exercise, the holder will receive 300 Class A Ordinary Shares. The
holder would have received 875 Class A Ordinary Shares if the exercise price was paid in cash. This will have the effect of reducing the potential “upside” of the holder’s investment in our company because the warrant holder will hold a smaller
number of Class A Ordinary Shares upon a cashless exercise of the warrants they hold.
The grant of registration rights to our Initial Shareholders and holders of our Private Placement Warrants may make it more difficult to complete our Partnering Transaction,
and the future exercise of such rights may adversely affect the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares.
Pursuant to the agreement entered into concurrently with the issuance and sale of the securities in our Initial Public Offering, our Initial Shareholders and their permitted transferees can demand that we register
the Founder Shares, the Performance Shares and the Class A Ordinary Shares into which such Founder Shares and Performance Shares are convertible, holders of our Private Placement Warrants and their permitted transferees can demand that we
register the Class A Ordinary Shares and the warrants (and the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of such warrants) underlying such Private Placement Warrants, and holders of Private Placement Warrants that may be issued upon
conversion of working capital loans may demand that we register the Class A Ordinary Shares and the warrants (and the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of such warrants) underlying such Private Placement Warrants.
Pursuant to the Forward Purchase Agreement, we will use our reasonable best efforts (i) to file within 30 days after the closing of the initial Partnering Transaction a registration statement with the SEC for a
secondary offering of the Forward Purchase Shares and the Forward Purchase Warrants (and underlying Class A Ordinary Shares), (ii) to cause such registration statement to be declared effective promptly thereafter but in no event later than 60
days after the initial filing, (iii) to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement until the earliest of (A) the date on which the purchaser or its assignees cease to hold the securities covered thereby, and (B) the date all of the
securities covered thereby can be sold publicly without restriction or limitation under Rule 144 under the Securities Act and (iv) after such registration statement is declared effective, cause us to conduct firm commitment underwritten
offerings, subject to certain limitations. In addition, the Forward Purchase Agreement provides for certain “piggy-back” registration rights to the holders of Forward Purchase Securities to include their securities in other registration
statements filed by us.
We will bear the cost of registering these securities. The registration and availability of such a significant number of securities for trading in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of
our Class A Ordinary Shares. In addition, the existence of the registration rights may make our Partnering Transaction more costly or difficult to conclude. This is because the shareholders of the partnering candidate may increase the equity
stake they seek in the combined entity or ask for more cash consideration to offset the negative impact on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares that is expected when the Class A Ordinary Shares owned by our Initial Shareholders,
holders of our Private Placement Warrants, holders of our working capital loans or their respective permitted transferees are registered.
Because we are neither limited to evaluating a partnering candidate in a particular industry sector nor have we selected any specific partnering candidate with which to pursue
our Partnering Transaction, Public Shareholders will be unable to ascertain the merits or risks of any particular partnering candidate’s operations.
Our efforts to identify a prospective Partnering Transaction candidate will not be limited to a particular industry, sector or geographic region. While we may pursue a Partnering Transaction opportunity in any
industry or sector, we intend to capitalize on the ability of our management team to identify, acquire and operate a business or businesses that can benefit from our management team’s established global relationships and operating experience. Our
management team has extensive experience in identifying and executing strategic investments globally and has done so successfully in a number of sectors, including financial services. Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of
Association prohibits us from effectuating a Partnering Transaction solely with another blank check company or similar company with nominal operations. Because we have not yet selected any specific partnering candidate with respect to a
Partnering Transaction, there is no basis to evaluate the possible merits or risks of any particular partnering candidate’s operations, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition or prospects. To the extent we complete our
Partnering Transaction, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business operations with which we combine. For example, if we combine with a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of sales or
earnings, we may be affected by the risks inherent in the business and operations of a financially unstable or a development stage entity. Although our officers and directors will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular partnering
candidate, we cannot assure Public Shareholders that we will properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors or that we will have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside of our
control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a partnering candidate. We also cannot assure Public Shareholders that an investment in our units will ultimately prove to be more
favorable to them than a direct investment, if such opportunity were available, in a partnering candidate. Accordingly, any shareholders or warrant holders who choose to remain shareholders or warrant holders following the Partnering Transaction
could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such shareholders or warrant holders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our
officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the
Partnering Transaction contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.
Although we have identified general criteria and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective partnering candidates, we may enter into our Partnering
Transaction with a partnering candidate that does not meet such criteria and guidelines, and as a result, the partnering candidate with which we enter into our Partnering Transaction may not have attributes entirely consistent with our general
criteria and guidelines.
Although we have identified general criteria and guidelines for evaluating prospective partnering candidates, it is possible that a partnering candidate with which we enter into our Partnering Transaction will not
have all of these positive attributes. If we complete our Partnering Transaction with a partnering candidate that does not meet some or all of these guidelines, such combination may not be as successful as a combination with a business that does
meet all of our general criteria and guidelines. In addition, if we announce a prospective Partnering Transaction with a partnering candidate that does not meet our general criteria and guidelines, a greater number of shareholders may exercise
their redemption rights, which may make it difficult for us to meet any closing condition with a partnering candidate that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. In addition, if shareholder approval of the
transaction is required by law, or we decide to obtain shareholder approval for business or other legal reasons, it may be more difficult for us to attain shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction if the partnering candidate does not
meet our general criteria and guidelines. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to Public
Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We may issue additional Class A Ordinary Shares or preference shares to complete our Partnering Transaction or under an employee incentive plan after completion of our
Partnering Transaction. We may also issue Class A Ordinary Shares upon the conversion of the Founder Shares at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our Partnering Transaction as a result of the anti-dilution provisions contained in our
Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association. Any such issuances would dilute the interest of our shareholders and likely present other risks.
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association authorizes the issuance of up to 380,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares, par value $0.0001 per share, 1,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares, par value, $0.0001
per share, 50,000,000 Class F Ordinary Shares, par value $0.0001 per share, and 1,000,000 preference shares, par value $0.0001 per share. As of March 15, 2023, there were 351,910,000, 750,000, and 48,595,500 authorized but unissued Class A
Ordinary Shares, Class B Ordinary Shares, and Class F Ordinary Shares, respectively, available for issuance. The Class F Ordinary Shares are automatically convertible into Class A Ordinary Shares concurrently with or immediately following the
consummation of our Partnering Transaction, initially at a one-for-one ratio but subject to adjustment as set forth herein and in our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association. As of December 31, 2022, there are no preference
shares issued and outstanding.
We may issue a substantial number of additional Class A Ordinary Shares or preference shares to complete our Partnering Transaction or under an employee incentive plan after completion of our Partnering Transaction.
We may also issue a substantial and potentially unlimited number of additional Class A Ordinary Shares in accordance with the terms of the Performance Shares, as the Performance Shares are not subject to a conversion limitation in the event of
increases in the price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. Further, our board of directors (in consultation with our Sponsor) may make a one-time election following our Initial Public Offering and prior to the consummation of a Partnering
Transaction, may elect to forfeit all of its Performance Shares, require us to effect a share split of the Founder Shares and deliver a number of Founder Shares equal to the number of Performance Shares it forfeits.
In addition, we may also issue Class A Ordinary Shares to redeem the warrants or upon conversion of the Founder Shares at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our Partnering Transaction as a result of the
anti-dilution provisions as set forth therein. However, our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provides, among other things, that prior to our Partnering Transaction, we may not issue additional shares that would entitle
the holders thereof to (i) receive funds from the trust account or (ii) vote together as a single class with our then outstanding Public Shares (a) on any Partnering Transaction or (b) to approve an amendment to our Amended and Restated
Memorandum and Articles of Association to (x) extend the time we have to consummate a Partnering Transaction beyond July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable) or (y) amend the foregoing provisions. These provisions of our Amended and
Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, like all provisions of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, may be amended with a shareholder vote. The issuance of additional ordinary or preference shares:
|
• |
may significantly dilute the equity interest of investors in our Initial Public Offering (which dilutive effect would increase as the price of our Class A Ordinary Shares increases on a year-over-year basis, in respect of shares issued
upon conversion of the Performance Shares);
|
|
• |
may subordinate the rights of holders of Class A Ordinary Shares if preference shares are issued with rights senior to those afforded our Class A Ordinary Shares;
|
|
• |
could cause a change in control if a substantial number of Class A Ordinary Shares is issued, which may affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation
or removal of our present officers and directors; and
|
|
• |
may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our units, Class A Ordinary Shares and/or warrants.
|
Our Initial Shareholders will receive additional Class A Ordinary Shares if we issue certain shares to consummate a Partnering Transaction.
The Founder Shares will automatically convert into Class A Ordinary Shares concurrently with or immediately following the consummation of our Partnering Transaction on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment for
share splits, share dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like, and subject to further adjustment as provided herein. In the case that additional Class A Ordinary Shares or Equity-Linked Securities are issued or deemed issued in
connection with our Partnering Transaction (including the Forward Purchase Shares, but not including the Forward Purchase Warrants or any Class A Ordinary Shares issuable with respect to Performance Shares), the number of Class A Ordinary Shares
issuable upon conversion of all Founder Shares will equal, in the aggregate, on an as-converted basis, 5% of the total number of as-converted Class A Ordinary Shares outstanding after such conversion (or 20% of the total number of as-converted
Class A Ordinary Shares outstanding, to the extent our board of directors elects the promote conversion), including the total number of Class A Ordinary Shares issued, or deemed issued or issuable upon conversion or exercise of any Equity-Linked
Securities or rights issued or deemed issued, by the Company in connection with or in relation to the consummation of the Partnering Transaction (including the Forward Purchase Securities); provided that
such conversion of Founder Shares into Class A Ordinary Shares will never occur on a less than one-for-one basis.
Resources could be wasted in researching Partnering Transactions that are not completed, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or
merge with another business. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our
warrants will expire worthless.
We anticipate that the investigation of each specific partnering candidate and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial
management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If we decide not to complete a specific Partnering Transaction, the costs incurred up to that point for the proposed transaction likely would not be
recoverable. Furthermore, if we reach an agreement relating to a specific partnering candidate, we may fail to complete our Partnering Transaction for any number of reasons including those beyond our control. Any such event will result in a loss
to us of the related costs incurred which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may only receive their
pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We may issue notes or other debt securities, or otherwise incur substantial debt, to complete a Partnering Transaction, which may adversely affect our leverage and financial
condition and thus negatively impact the value of our shareholders’ investment in us.
Although we have no commitments as of the date of this Report to issue any notes or other debt securities, we may choose to incur substantial debt to complete our Partnering Transaction. We and our officers have
agreed that we will not incur any indebtedness unless we have obtained from the lender a waiver of any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to the monies held in the trust account. As such, no issuance of debt will affect the per
share amount available for redemption from the trust account. Nevertheless, the incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative effects, including:
|
• |
default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues after a Partnering Transaction are insufficient to repay our debt obligations;
|
|
• |
acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we make all principal and interest payments when due if we breach certain covenants that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves without a waiver
or renegotiation of that covenant;
|
|
• |
our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt is payable on demand;
|
|
• |
our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if the debt contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain such financing while the debt is outstanding;
|
|
• |
our inability to pay dividends on our Class A Ordinary Shares;
|
|
• |
using a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce the funds available for dividends on our Class A Ordinary Shares if declared, expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions and
other general corporate purposes;
|
|
• |
limitations on our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry in which we operate;
|
|
• |
increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation; and
|
|
• |
limitations on our ability to borrow additional amounts for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of our strategy and other purposes and other disadvantages compared to our competitors who
have less debt.
|
We may only be able to complete one Partnering Transaction with the cash held in our trust account, which will cause us to be solely dependent on a single business which may
have a limited number of products or services. This lack of diversification may negatively impact our operations and profitability.
The net proceeds from our Initial Public Offering and the private placement of warrants provided us with $285,226,827 currently held in the trust account that we may use to complete our Partnering Transaction. In
addition, prior to the consummation of our Initial Public Offering, we entered into a Forward Purchase Agreement with an affiliate, Corsair V Financial Services Capital Partners, L.P., pursuant to which such investor committed to purchase in the
aggregate, up to 10,000,000 units, with each unit consisting of one Class A ordinary share and one-third of one warrant to purchase one Class A ordinary share at $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment, at a purchase price of $10.00 per unit, in
private placements to occur concurrently, and only in connection with, the closing of our initial Partnering Transaction. The obligations of the investor under the Forward Purchase Agreement will not depend on whether any Class A Ordinary Shares
are redeemed by our Public Shareholders. The obligations of such investor to purchase the Forward Purchase Securities are subject to the approval, prior to our entering into a definitive agreement for our initial Partnering Transaction, of its
investment committee and the Forward Purchase Agreement contains customary closing conditions. The proceeds from the sale of Forward Purchase Securities, if any, may be used as part of the consideration to the sellers in our initial Partnering
Transaction, expenses in connection with our initial Partnering Transaction or for working capital in the post-transaction company. There can be no assurance that the purchase of the Forward Purchase Agreement will close.
We may effectuate our Partnering Transaction with a single partnering candidate or multiple partnering candidates simultaneously or within a short period of time. However, we may not be able to effectuate our
Partnering Transaction with more than one partnering candidate because of various factors, including the existence of complex accounting issues and the requirement that we prepare and file pro forma financial statements with the SEC that present
operating results and the financial condition of several partnering candidates as if they had been operated on a combined basis. By completing our Partnering Transaction with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may subject us to
numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments. Further, we would not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to
complete several Partnering Transactions in different industries or different areas of a single industry.
Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be:
|
• |
solely dependent upon the performance of a single business, property or asset, or
|
|
• |
dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.
|
This lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory risks, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate
subsequent to our Partnering Transaction.
We may attempt to simultaneously complete Partnering Transactions with multiple prospective partnering candidates, which may hinder our ability to complete our Partnering
Transaction and give rise to increased costs and risks that could negatively impact our operations and profitability.
If we determine to simultaneously acquire several businesses that are owned by different sellers, we will need for each of such sellers to agree that our purchase of its business is contingent on the simultaneous
closings of the other Partnering Transactions, which may make it more difficult for us, and delay our ability, to complete our Partnering Transaction. With multiple Partnering Transactions, we could also face additional risks, including
additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence investigations (if there are multiple sellers) and the additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of the operations and services or
products of the acquired companies in a single operating business. If we are unable to adequately address these risks, it could negatively impact our profitability and results of operations.
We may attempt to complete our Partnering Transaction with a private company about which little information is available, which may result in a Partnering Transaction with a
company that is not as profitable as we suspected, if at all.
In pursuing our Partnering Transaction strategy, we may seek to effectuate our Partnering Transaction with a privately held company. Very little public information generally exists about private companies, and we
could be required to make our decision on whether to pursue a potential Partnering Transaction on the basis of limited information, which may result in a Partnering Transaction with a company that is not as profitable as we suspected, if at all.
We do not have a specified maximum redemption threshold. The absence of such a redemption threshold may make it possible for us to complete our Partnering Transaction with
which a substantial majority of our shareholders or warrant holders do not agree.
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association does not provide a specified maximum redemption threshold, except that in no event will we redeem our Public Shares in an amount that would cause our
net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001. In addition, our proposed Partnering Transaction may impose a minimum cash requirement for: (i) cash consideration to be paid to the partnering candidate or its owners, (ii) cash for working capital
or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the retention of cash to satisfy other conditions. As a result, we may be able to complete our Partnering Transaction even though a substantial majority of our Public Shareholders do not agree with the
transaction and have redeemed their shares or, if we seek shareholder approval of our Partnering Transaction and do not conduct redemptions in connection with our Partnering Transaction pursuant to the tender offer rules, have entered into
privately negotiated agreements to sell their shares to our Sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or any of their affiliates. In the event the aggregate cash consideration we would be required to pay for all Class A Ordinary Shares that are
validly submitted for redemption plus any amount required to satisfy cash conditions pursuant to the terms of the proposed Partnering Transaction exceed the aggregate amount of cash available to us, we will not complete the Partnering Transaction
or redeem any shares in connection with such Partnering Transaction, all Class A Ordinary Shares submitted for redemption will be returned to the holders thereof, and we instead may search for an alternate Partnering Transaction.
In order to effectuate a Partnering Transaction, special purpose acquisition companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and other
governing instruments, including their warrant agreements. We cannot assure Public Shareholders that we will not seek to amend our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association or governing instruments in a manner that will make it
easier for us to complete our Partnering Transaction that our shareholders may not support.
In order to effectuate a Partnering Transaction, special purpose acquisition companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and governing instruments, including their warrant
agreements. For example, special purpose acquisition companies have amended the definition of Partnering Transaction, increased redemption thresholds and extended the time to consummate a Partnering Transaction and, with respect to their
warrants, amended their warrant agreements to require the warrants to be exchanged for cash and/or other securities. Amending certain provisions of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association requires the approval of a special
resolution, under Cayman Islands law which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of at least two-thirds of the shareholders who attend and vote at a general meeting of the company, and amending our warrant agreement requires a vote of
holders of at least 50% of the public warrants that vote on such amendment and, solely with respect to any amendment to the terms of the Private Placement Warrants or any provision of the warrant agreement with respect to the Private Placement
Warrants, 50% of the number of the then outstanding Private Placement Warrants. In addition, our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association requires us to provide our Public Shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their
Public Shares for cash if we propose an amendment to our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our Public Shares if we do not complete a Partnering
Transaction by July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable) or with respect to any other material provisions relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-Partnering Transaction activity. To the extent any of such amendments would be deemed to
fundamentally change the nature of the securities we would register, or seek an exemption from registration for, the affected securities. We may seek to amend our charter or governing instruments or extend the time to consummate a Partnering
Transaction in order to effectuate our Partnering Transaction.
The provisions of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association that relate to our pre-Partnering Transaction activity (and corresponding provisions of the
agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account) may be amended with the approval of at least two-thirds of the shareholders who attend and vote at a general meeting of the company, which is a lower amendment threshold than that
of some other special purpose acquisition companies. It may be easier for us, therefore, to amend our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association to facilitate the completion of a Partnering Transaction that some of our
shareholders may not support.
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provides that any of its provisions related to Partnering Transaction activity (including the requirement to deposit proceeds of our Initial Public
Offering and the private placement of warrants into the trust account and not release such amounts except in specified circumstances, and to provide redemption rights to Public Shareholders as described herein) may be amended if approved by
special resolution, under Cayman Islands law which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of at least two-thirds of the shareholders who attend and vote at a general meeting of the company, and corresponding provisions of the trust agreement
governing the release of funds from our trust account may be amended if approved by holders of 65% of our Ordinary Shares who attend and vote at a general meeting of our company for that purpose. In all other instances, our Amended and Restated
Memorandum and Articles of Association may be amended by holders of a majority of the voting power of our outstanding Ordinary Shares entitled to vote thereon, subject to applicable provisions of applicable stock exchange rules. Our Initial
Shareholders, who, with their Founder Shares and Performance Shares, will collectively hold 20% of the voting power of our Ordinary Shares prior to the completion of a Partnering Transaction, may participate in any vote to amend our Amended and
Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association and/or trust agreement and will have the discretion to vote in any manner they choose. As a result, we may be able to amend the provisions of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of
Association which govern our pre-Partnering Transaction behavior more easily than some other special purpose acquisition companies, and this may increase our ability to complete a Partnering Transaction with which Public Shareholders do not
agree.
Our shareholders may pursue remedies against us for any breach of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association.
Our Sponsor, executive officers and directors have agreed, pursuant to written agreements with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association to modify
the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our Public Shares if we do not complete our Partnering Transaction by July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable) or with respect to any other material provisions relating to
shareholders’ rights or pre-Partnering Transaction activity, unless we provide our Public Shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their Class A Ordinary Shares upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal
to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account (net of Permitted Withdrawals and up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of
then outstanding Public Shares. Our shareholders are not parties to, or third-party beneficiaries of, these agreements and, as a result, will not have the ability to pursue remedies against our Sponsor, executive officers or directors for any
breach of these agreements. As a result, in the event of a breach, our shareholders would need to pursue a shareholder derivative action, subject to applicable law.
We may be unable to obtain additional financing to complete our Partnering Transaction or to fund the operations and growth of a partnering candidate, which could compel us
to restructure or abandon a particular Partnering Transaction. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for
distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
Although we believe that the cash currently held in our trust account, together with the sale of the Forward Purchase Securities, will be sufficient to allow us to complete our Partnering Transaction, because we have
not yet selected any specific partnering candidate we cannot ascertain the capital requirements for any particular transaction. If the cash held in our trust account, together with the sale of any Forward Purchase Securities, proves to be
insufficient, either because of the size of our Partnering Transaction, the depletion of the cash held outside the trust account in search of a partnering candidate, the obligation to redeem for cash a significant number of shares from
shareholders who elect redemption in connection with our Partnering Transaction, the sale of the Forward Purchase Securities does not close or the terms of negotiated transactions to purchase shares in connection with our Partnering Transaction,
we may be required to seek additional financing or to abandon the proposed Partnering Transaction. We cannot assure Public Shareholders that such financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. The current economic environment has
made it especially difficult for companies to obtain acquisition financing. To the extent that additional financing proves to be unavailable when needed to complete our Partnering Transaction, we would be compelled to either restructure the
transaction or abandon that particular Partnering Transaction and seek an alternative partnering candidate. If we do not complete our Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the
trust account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless. In addition, even if we do not need additional financing to complete our Partnering Transaction, we may require such financing to
fund the operations or growth of the partnering candidate. The failure to secure additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the continued development or growth of the partnering candidate. None of our officers, directors or
shareholders is required to provide any financing to us in connection with or after our Partnering Transaction.
Our Initial Shareholders control a substantial interest in us and thus may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that
our Class A ordinary shareholders do not support.
Our Initial Shareholders, with their Founder Shares and their Performance Shares, hold approximately 20% of the voting power of our Ordinary Shares prior to the completion of a Partnering Transaction. Accordingly,
they may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that our Class A ordinary shareholders do not support, including amendments to our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of
Association. Further, pursuant to a Letter Agreement with our Sponsor, we have agreed not to enter into a definitive agreement regarding a Partnering Transaction without the prior written consent of our Sponsor. As a result, we may not be
permitted to enter into a Partnering Transaction that our Board believes to be in the shareholders’ best interests. Further, for so long as any Performance Shares remain outstanding, we may not, without the prior or written consent of the holders
of a majority of the Performance Shares then outstanding take certain actions such as to (i) change our fiscal year, (ii) increase the number of directors on the Board, (iii) pay any dividends or effect any split on any of our Ordinary Shares or
make any distributions of cash, securities or any other property, (iv) adopt any shareholder rights plan, (v) acquire any entity or business with assets at a purchase price greater than 10% or more of our total assets measured in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States or the accounting standards then used by us in the preparation of our financial statements or (vi) issue any Class A Ordinary Shares in excess of 20% of our then outstanding Class A
Ordinary Shares or that would otherwise require a shareholder vote pursuant to the rules of the stock exchange on which the Class A Ordinary Shares are then listed or (vii) make a rights offering to all or substantially all of the holders of
Class B Ordinary Shares or issue additional Class B Ordinary Shares. As a result, the holders of the Performance Shares may be able to prevent us from taking such actions that the Board believes is in our interest.
If our Initial Shareholders purchase any units in our Initial Public Offering or if our Initial Shareholders purchase any additional Class A Ordinary Shares in the aftermarket or in privately negotiated transactions,
this would increase their control. Neither our Initial Shareholders nor, to our knowledge, any of our officers or directors, have any current intention to purchase additional securities, other than as disclosed in this Report. Factors that would
be considered in making such additional purchases would include consideration of the current trading price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. In addition, our board of directors, whose members were elected by our Sponsor, is and will be divided into
three classes, each of which will generally serve for a terms for three years with only one class of directors being elected in each year. We may not hold an annual meeting of shareholders to elect new directors prior to the completion of our
Partnering Transaction, in which case all of the current directors will continue in office until at least the completion of the Partnering Transaction. If there is an annual meeting, as a consequence of our “staggered” board of directors, only a
minority of the board of directors will be considered for election and our Initial Shareholders, because of their ownership position, will have considerable influence regarding the outcome. Accordingly, our Initial Shareholders will continue to
exert control at least until the completion of our Partnering Transaction.
Because we must furnish our shareholders with partnering candidate financial statements, we may lose the ability to complete an otherwise advantageous Partnering Transaction
with some prospective partnering candidates.
The federal proxy rules require that the proxy statement with respect to the vote on a Partnering Transaction include historical and pro forma financial statement disclosure. We will include the same financial
statement disclosure in connection with our tender offer documents, whether or not they are required under the tender offer rules. These financial statements may be required to be prepared in accordance with, or be reconciled to, accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), or international financial reporting standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”), depending on the circumstances and the historical financial
statements may be required to be audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”). These financial statement requirements may limit the pool of potential partnering candidates we
may acquire because some partnering candidates may be unable to provide such financial statements in time for us to disclose such statements in accordance with federal proxy rules and complete our Partnering Transaction within the prescribed time
frame.
Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may make it more difficult for us to effectuate our Partnering Transaction, require substantial financial and management
resources, and increase the time and costs of completing a Partnering Transaction.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls beginning with this Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2022. Only in the event we are
deemed to be a large accelerated filer or an accelerated filer, and no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, will we be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal
control over financial reporting. Further, for as long as we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal control over
financial reporting. The fact that we are a newly organized company established for the purpose of identifying a company to partner with in order to effectuate a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar
Partnering Transaction makes compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act particularly burdensome on us as compared to other public companies because a partnering candidate with which we seek to complete our Partnering Transaction
may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of its internal controls. The development of the internal control of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time
and costs necessary to complete any such Partnering Transaction.
Provisions in our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in
the future for our Class A Ordinary Shares and could entrench management.
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association contains provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that shareholders may consider to be in their best interests. These provisions
include a staggered board of directors, the ability of the board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new classes of preference shares, and potential payments owed with respect to our Performance Shares, which may make the removal of
management more difficult and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.
If we effect our Partnering Transaction with a company located outside of the United States, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may adversely affect us.
If we pursue a partnering candidate with operations or opportunities outside of the United States for our Partnering Transaction, we may face additional burdens in connection with investigating, agreeing to and
completing such Partnering Transaction, and if we effect such Partnering Transaction, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may negatively impact our operations.
If we pursue a partnering candidate with operations or opportunities outside of the United States for our Partnering Transaction, we would be subject to risks associated with cross-border Partnering Transactions,
including in connection with investigating, agreeing to and completing our Partnering Transaction, conducting due diligence in a foreign jurisdiction, having such transaction approved by any local governments, regulators or agencies and changes
in the purchase price based on fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
If we effect our Partnering Transaction with such a company, we would be subject to any special considerations or risks associated with companies operating in an international setting, including any of the following:
|
• |
costs and difficulties inherent in managing cross-border business operations;
|
|
• |
rules and regulations regarding currency redemption;
|
|
• |
complex corporate withholding taxes on individuals;
|
|
• |
laws governing the manner in which future Partnering Transactions may be effected;
|
|
• |
exchange listing and/or delisting requirements;
|
|
• |
tariffs and trade barriers;
|
|
• |
regulations related to customs and import/export matters;
|
|
• |
local or regional economic policies and market conditions;
|
|
• |
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
• |
challenges in managing and staffing international operations;
|
|
• |
tax issues, such as tax law changes and variations in tax laws as compared to the United States;
|
|
• |
currency fluctuations and exchange controls;
|
|
• |
challenges in collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
• |
cultural and language differences;
|
|
• |
employment regulations;
|
|
• |
underdeveloped or unpredictable legal or regulatory systems;
|
|
• |
protection of intellectual property;
|
|
• |
social unrest, crime, strikes, riots and civil disturbances;
|
|
• |
regime changes and political upheaval;
|
|
• |
terrorist attacks and wars; and
|
|
• |
deterioration of political relations with the United States.
|
We may not be able to adequately address these additional risks. If we were unable to do so, we may be unable to complete such Partnering Transaction, or, if we complete such Partnering Transaction, our operations
might suffer, either of which may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A potential partnering candidate’s business could be affected by political instability, including relating to Ukraine and related sanctions or export controls
imposed by the U.S., EU, UK, or other governments.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine along with the responses of the governments of the United States, EU member states, the United Kingdom, and other nations have the potential to materially adversely affect a potential
target business’ operations or assets in or (direct or indirect) dealings with parties organized or located within Ukraine, Russia, and Belarus. Due to geopolitical developments, the United States, European Union, United Kingdom, and other
nations have announced or threatened new sanctions and export restrictions targeting Russian and Belarusian individuals and entities, as well as disputed territories within Ukraine. Russia and its allies have and may continue to respond with
countermeasures, which could further restrict the partnering candidate business’ operations in or related to the foregoing countries. It is unclear how long existing restrictions (and countermeasures) will remain in place or whether new
restrictions (or countermeasures) may be imposed. Existing restrictions have negatively impacted the Russian economy, and there can be no guarantee that existing (or new) restrictions or countermeasures will not materially adversely affect the
Russian (or global) economy. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse impact on a potential partnering candidate business’ financial condition, results of operations or prospects.
Failure of the U.S. federal government to manage its fiscal matters or to raise or further suspend the debt ceiling, and changes in the amount of federal debt, may negatively
impact the economic environment and adversely impact our results of operations or those of a potential target.
The U.S. federal government has established a limit on the level of federal debt that it can have outstanding, often referred to as the debt ceiling. Congress has authority to raise or suspend the debt ceiling and to
approve the funding of U.S. federal government operations within the debt ceiling, and has done both frequently in the past, often on a relatively short-term basis. On January 19, 2023, the U.S. reached its borrowing limit and currently faces a
risk of defaulting on its debt. Generally, if effective legislation to manage the level of federal debt is not enacted and the debt ceiling is reached in any given year, the federal government may suspend its investments for certain government
accounts, among other available options, in order to prioritize payments on its obligations. It is anticipated that the U.S. federal government will be able to fund its operations through approximately mid-2023. However, contention among
policymakers, among other factors, may hinder the enactment of policies to further increase the borrowing limit or to address the debt balance in a timely manner. If Congress does not raise the debt ceiling, it may increase the risk of default by
the U.S. on its obligations, of a credit rating downgrade of the U.S. federal government and of other economic dislocations. Such circumstances, or the perceived risk of such circumstances, could consequently have a material adverse effect on the
financial markets and economic conditions in the U.S. and globally. If economic conditions severely deteriorate, they could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or prospects and those of a potential
target business. These risks may also adversely impact our overall liquidity, our borrowing costs or the market price of our securities.
Risks Relating to our Securities
The ability of our Public Shareholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares may not allow us to complete the most desirable Partnering
Transaction or optimize our capital structure.
At the time we enter into an agreement for our Partnering Transaction, we will not know how many shareholders may exercise their redemption rights, and therefore will need to structure the transaction based on our
expectations as to the number of shares that will be submitted for redemption. If our Partnering Transaction agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the trust account to pay the purchase price, or requires us to have a minimum
amount of cash at closing, we will need to reserve a portion of the cash in the trust account to meet such requirements, or arrange for third party financing. In addition, if a larger number of shares is submitted for redemption than we initially
expected, we may need to restructure the transaction to reserve a greater portion of the cash in the trust account or arrange for third party financing. Raising additional third party financing may involve dilutive equity issuances or the
incurrence of indebtedness at higher than desirable levels. The above considerations may limit our ability to complete the most desirable Partnering Transaction available to us or optimize our capital structure.
The ability of our Public Shareholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares could increase the probability that our Partnering
Transaction would be unsuccessful and that Public Shareholders would have to wait for liquidation in order to redeem their shares.
If our Partnering Transaction agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the trust account to pay the purchase price, or requires us to have a minimum amount of cash at closing, the probability that our
Partnering Transaction would be unsuccessful is increased. If our Partnering Transaction is unsuccessful, Public Shareholders would not receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account until we liquidate the trust account. If
Public Shareholders are in need of immediate liquidity, they could attempt to sell their shares in the open market; however, at such time our shares may trade at a discount to the pro rata amount per share in the trust account. In either
situation, Public Shareholders may suffer a material loss on their investment or lose the benefit of funds expected in connection with their exercise of redemption rights until we liquidate or they are able to sell their shares in the open
market.
If a shareholder fails to receive notice of our offer to redeem our Public Shares in connection with our Partnering Transaction, or fails to comply with the procedures for
tendering its shares, such shares may not be redeemed.
We will comply with the proxy rules or tender offer rules, as applicable, when conducting redemptions in connection with our Partnering Transaction. Despite our compliance with these rules, if a shareholder fails to
receive our proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable, such shareholder may not become aware of the opportunity to redeem its shares. In addition, proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable, that we will furnish to
holders of our Public Shares in connection with our Partnering Transaction will describe the various procedures that must be complied with in order to validly tender or submit Public Shares for redemption. For example, we intend to require our
Public Shareholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights, whether they are record holders or hold their shares in “street name,” to, at the holder’s option, either deliver their share certificates to our transfer agent, or to deliver their
shares to our transfer agent electronically prior to the date set forth in the proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable. In the case of proxy materials, this date may be up to two business days prior to the date on which the vote
on the proposal to approve the Partnering Transaction is to be held. In addition, if we conduct redemptions in connection with a shareholder vote, we intend to require a public shareholder seeking redemption of its Public Shares to also submit a
written request for redemption to our transfer agent two business days prior to the vote in which the name of the beneficial owner of such shares is included. In the event that a shareholder fails to comply with these or any other procedures
disclosed in the proxy or tender offer materials, as applicable, its shares may not be redeemed.
Public Shareholders will not have any rights or interests in funds from the trust account, except under certain limited circumstances. Therefore, to liquidate their
investment, Public Shareholders may be forced to sell their Public Shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.
Our Public Shareholders are entitled to receive funds from the trust account only upon the earlier to occur of: (i) our completion of a Partnering Transaction, and then only in connection with those Class A Ordinary
Shares that such shareholder properly elected to redeem, subject to the limitations described herein, (ii) the redemption of any Public Shares properly tendered in connection with a shareholder vote to amend our Amended and Restated Memorandum
and Articles of Association to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our Public Shares if we do not complete our Partnering Transaction by July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable) or with respect to any other
material provisions relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-Partnering Transaction activity, and (iii) the redemption of our Public Shares if we do not complete a Partnering Transaction by July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable), subject
to applicable law and as further described herein. In addition, if we do not complete a Partnering Transaction by July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable), Cayman Islands law may require that we submit a plan of dissolution to our
then-existing shareholders for approval prior to the distribution of the cash held in our trust account. In that case, Public Shareholders may be forced to wait beyond July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable) before they receive funds
from our trust account. In no other circumstances will a public shareholder have any right or interest of any kind in the trust account. Holders of warrants will not have any right to the cash held in the trust account with respect to the
warrants. Accordingly, to liquidate their investment, they may be forced to sell their Public Shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.
The NYSE may delist our securities from trading on its exchange, which could limit Public Shareholders’ ability to make transactions in our securities and subject us to
additional trading restrictions.
Our units, Class A Ordinary Shares and warrants are currently listed on the NYSE. We cannot assure Public Shareholders that our securities will continue to be listed on the NYSE in the future or prior to our
Partnering Transaction. In order to continue listing our securities on the NYSE prior to our Partnering Transaction, we must maintain certain financial, distribution and share price levels. Generally, we must maintain a minimum average global
market capitalization and a minimum number of holders of our securities. Additionally, in connection with our Partnering Transaction, we will be required to demonstrate compliance with the NYSE’s initial listing requirements, which are more
rigorous than NYSE’s continued listing requirements, in order to continue to maintain the listing of our securities on the NYSE. For instance, our share price would generally be required to be at least $4.00 per share and our shareholder’s equity
would generally be required to be at least $5.0 million. We cannot assure Public Shareholders that we will be able to meet those initial listing requirements at that time.
If the NYSE delists our securities from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities could be quoted on an over-the-counter
market. If this were to occur, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:
|
• |
a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;
|
|
• |
reduced liquidity for our securities;
|
|
• |
a determination that our Class A Ordinary Shares are a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our Class A Ordinary Shares to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the
secondary trading market for our securities;
|
|
• |
a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and
|
|
• |
a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
|
The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.”
Because our units, Class A Ordinary Shares and warrants are currently listed on the NYSE, our units, Class A Ordinary Shares and warrants qualify as covered securities under the statute. Although the states are preempted from regulating the sale
of our securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate companies if there is a suspicion of fraud, and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate or bar the sale of covered securities in a
particular case. While we are not aware of a state having used these powers to prohibit or restrict the sale of securities issued by blank check companies, other than the State of Idaho, certain state securities regulators view blank check
companies unfavorably and might use these powers, or threaten to use these powers, to hinder the sale of securities of blank check companies in their states. Further, if we were no longer listed on the NYSE, our securities would not qualify as
covered securities under the statute and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities.
Public Shareholders will not be entitled to protections normally afforded to investors of many other blank check companies.
Since the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants are intended to be used to complete a Partnering Transaction with a partnering candidate that has not been
selected, we may be deemed to be a “blank check” company under the United States securities laws. However, because we had net tangible assets in excess of $5,000,000 upon the completion of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the Private
Placement Warrants and we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, including an audited balance sheet demonstrating this fact, we are exempt from rules promulgated by the SEC to protect investors in blank check companies, such as Rule 419.
Accordingly, investors are not afforded the benefits or protections of those rules. Among other things, this means we have a longer period of time to complete our Partnering Transaction than do companies subject to Rule 419. Moreover, if our
Initial Public Offering were subject to Rule 419, that rule would prohibit the release of any interest earned on funds held in the trust account to us unless and until the funds in the trust account were released to us in connection with our
completion of a Partnering Transaction.
If third parties bring claims against us, the cash held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by shareholders may be less than
$10.00 per share.
Our placement of funds in the trust account may not protect those funds from third party claims against us. Although we will seek to have all vendors, service providers, prospective partnering candidates and other
entities with which we do business (other than our independent registered public accounting firm) execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the trust account for the benefit of
our Public Shareholders, such parties may not execute such agreements, or even if they execute such agreements they may not be prevented from bringing claims against the trust account, including, but not limited to, fraudulent inducement, breach
of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain advantage with respect to a claim against our assets, including the funds held in the trust
account. If any third party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in the trust account, our management will perform an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will only enter into an agreement with a
third party that has not executed a waiver if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be significantly more beneficial to us than any alternative. The underwriters of our Initial Public Offering will not execute agreements
with us waiving such claims to the monies held in the trust account.
Examples of possible instances where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third party consultant whose particular expertise or skills are believed by management to
be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver. In addition, there is no guarantee that such entities will
agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the trust account for any reason. Upon redemption of our Public Shares,
if we do not complete our Partnering Transaction within the prescribed timeframe, or upon the exercise of a redemption right in connection with our Partnering Transaction, we will be required to provide for payment of claims of creditors that
were not waived that may be brought against us within the 10 years following redemption.
Accordingly, the per-share redemption amount received by Public Shareholders could be less than the $10.00 per public share initially held in the trust account, due to claims of such creditors. Pursuant to the Letter
Agreement, our Sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a third party for services rendered or products sold to us, or a prospective partnering candidate with which we have entered into a written letter
of intent, confidentiality or other similar agreement or Partnering Transaction agreement, reduce the amount of funds in the trust account to below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per public share and (ii) the actual amount per public share held in the
trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account, if less than $10.00 per public share due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, less taxes payable, provided that such
liability will not apply to any claims by a third party or prospective partnering candidate who executed a waiver of any and all rights to the monies held in the trust account (whether or not such waiver is enforceable) nor will it apply to any
claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of our Initial Public Offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.
However, we have not asked our Sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations, nor have we independently verified whether our Sponsor has sufficient funds to satisfy its indemnity obligations and we believe
that our Sponsor’s only assets are securities of our company. Therefore, we cannot assure Public Shareholders that our Sponsor would be able to satisfy those obligations. As a result, if any such claims were successfully made against the trust
account, the funds available for our Partnering Transaction and redemptions could be reduced to less than $10.00 per public share. In such event, we may not be able to complete our Partnering Transaction, and Public Shareholders would receive
such lesser amount per share in connection with any redemption of their Public Shares. None of our officers or directors will indemnify us for claims by third parties including, without limitation, claims by vendors and prospective partnering
candidates.
The securities in which we invest the cash held in the trust account could bear a negative rate of interest, which could reduce the interest income available for payment of
taxes or reduce the value of the assets held in trust such that the per share redemption amount received by shareholders may be less than $10.00 per share.
The net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and certain proceeds from the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, in the amount of $285,226,827, are held in an interest-bearing trust account. The cash held in the
trust account may only be invested in direct U.S. Treasury obligations having a maturity of 185 days or less, or in certain money market funds which invest only in direct U.S. Treasury obligations. While short-term U.S. Treasury obligations
currently yield a positive rate of interest, they have briefly yielded negative interest rates in recent years. Central banks in Europe and Japan pursued interest rates below zero in recent years, and the Open Market Committee of the Federal
Reserve has not ruled out the possibility that it may in the future adopt similar policies in the United States. In the event of very low or negative yields, the amount of interest income (net of Permitted Withdrawals) would be reduced. In the
event that we are unable to complete our initial Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders are entitled to receive their pro-rata share of the cash held in the trust account, plus any interest income. If the balance of the trust account is
reduced below $280,900,000 as a result of negative interest rates, the amount of funds in the trust account available for distribution to our Public Shareholders may be reduced below $10.00 per share.
Our directors may decide not to enforce the indemnification obligations of our Sponsor, resulting in a reduction in the amount of funds in the trust account available for
distribution to our Public Shareholders.
In the event that the cash in the trust account is reduced below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per share and (ii) the actual amount per public share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust
account if less than $10.00 per public share due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case less taxes payable, and our Sponsor asserts that it is unable to satisfy its obligations or that it has no indemnification obligations
related to a particular claim, our independent directors would determine whether to take legal action against our Sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations. While we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action
on our behalf against our Sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business judgment and subject to their fiduciary duties may choose not to do so in any
particular instance. If our independent directors choose not to enforce these indemnification obligations, the amount of funds in the trust account available for distribution to our Public Shareholders may be reduced below $10.00 per share.
If, after we distribute the cash in the trust account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up
petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, a bankruptcy or insolvency court may seek to recover such cash, and the members of our board of directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors, thereby
exposing the members of our board of directors and us to claims of punitive damages.
If, after we distribute the cash in the trust account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up petition is filed against us that is not
dismissed, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy or insolvency laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy or insolvency
court could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our shareholders. In addition, our board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or having acted in bad faith, by paying Public Shareholders
from the trust account prior to addressing the claims of creditors, thereby exposing itself and us to claims of punitive damages.
If, before distributing the cash in the trust account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up
petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority over the claims of our shareholders and the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our shareholders in connection with
our liquidation may be reduced.
If, before distributing the cash in the trust account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up petition is filed against us that is not
dismissed, the cash held in the trust account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy or insolvency law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of our shareholders.
To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our shareholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.
Our shareholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against us to the extent of distributions received by them upon redemption of their shares.
If we are forced to enter into an insolvent liquidation, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed as an unlawful payment if it was proved that immediately following the date on which the
distribution was made, we were unable to pay our debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. As a result, a liquidator could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our shareholders. Furthermore, our directors may be viewed
as having breached their fiduciary duties to us or our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, thereby exposing themselves and our company to claims, by paying Public Shareholders from the trust account prior to addressing the claims of
creditors. We cannot assure Public Shareholders that claims will not be brought against us for these reasons. We and our directors and officers who knowingly and willfully authorized or permitted any distribution to be paid out of our share
premium account while we were unable to pay our debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business would be guilty of an offence and may be liable to a fine of $18,293 and to imprisonment for five years in the Cayman Islands.
Certain agreements related to our Initial Public Offering may be amended without shareholder approval.
Each of the agreements related to our Initial Public Offering to which we are a party, other than the warrant agreement and the investment management trust agreement, may be amended without shareholder approval. Such
agreements are: the Letter Agreement among us and our Sponsor, officers and directors; the registration and shareholder rights agreement among us and our Initial Shareholders; the private placement warrants purchase agreement between us and our
Sponsor; the administrative services agreement among us, our Sponsor and an affiliate of our Sponsor; and the Forward Purchase Agreement between us and an affiliate of our Sponsor. These agreements contain various provisions that our Public
Shareholders might deem to be material. For example, our Letter Agreement and the underwriting agreement contain certain lock-up provisions with respect to the Founder Shares, Private Placement Warrants and other securities held by our Sponsor,
officers and directors. Amendments to such agreements would require the consent of the applicable parties thereto and would need to be approved by our board of directors, which may do so for a variety of reasons, including to facilitate our
Partnering Transaction. While we do not expect our board of directors to approve any amendment to any of these agreements prior to our Partnering Transaction, it may be possible that our board of directors, in exercising its business judgment and
subject to its fiduciary duties, chooses to approve one or more amendments to any such agreement. Any amendment entered into in connection with the consummation of our Partnering Transaction will be disclosed in our proxy solicitation or tender
offer materials, as applicable, related to such Partnering Transaction, and any other material amendment to any of our material agreements will be disclosed in a filing with the SEC. Any such amendments would not require approval from our
shareholders, may result in the completion of our Partnering Transaction that may not otherwise have been possible, and may have an adverse effect on the value of an investment in our securities. For example, amendments to the lock-up provision
discussed above may result in our Initial Shareholders selling their securities earlier than they would otherwise be permitted, which may have an adverse effect on the price of our securities.
In addition, pursuant to the terms of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, the powers, preferences or relative, participating, optional or other special rights of the Performance Shares
may be amended only with the prior vote or written consent of the holders of a majority of the Performance Shares then outstanding, voting separately as a single class, without the need to seek approval from any other class of our Ordinary
Shares, even in situations where the amendment to the terms of the Performance Shares may adversely impact such other class of Ordinary Shares.
We may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner that may be adverse to holders of public warrants for amendments necessary for the warrants to be classified as equity. As
a result, the exercise price of Public Shareholders’ warrants could be increased, the exercise period could be shortened and the number of Class A Ordinary Shares purchasable upon exercise of a warrant could be decreased, all without Public
Shareholders’ approval.
Our warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants
may be amended without the consent of any shareholder or warrant holder for the purpose of (i) curing any ambiguity or to correct any defective provision or mistake, (ii) adjusting the provisions relating to cash dividends on Class A Ordinary
Shares as contemplated by and in accordance with the warrant agreement or (iii) adding or changing any provisions with respect to matters or questions arising under the warrant agreement as the parties to the warrant agreement may deem necessary
or desirable and that the parties deem to not adversely affect the rights of the registered holders of the warrants; provided that the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding
public warrants that vote to amend the warrant agreement, after at least 10 days’ notice that an amendment is being sought, is required to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders. Although our ability to
amend the terms of the public warrants with such 50% consent of is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the warrants, convert the warrants into cash or shares (at a
ratio different than initially provided), shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of Class A Ordinary Shares purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.
We may redeem Public Shareholders’ unexpired warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to Public Shareholders, thereby making their warrants
worthless.
We have the ability to redeem outstanding warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant; provided that the
closing price of our Class A Ordinary Shares equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for share splits, share capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending
on the third trading day prior to proper notice of such redemption; provided that on the date we give notice of redemption, we will not redeem the warrants unless an effective registration statement under
the Securities Act covering the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants is effective and a current prospectus relating to those Class A Ordinary Shares is available throughout the 30-day redemption period, except if the
warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis and such cashless exercise is exempt from registration under the Securities Act. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to
register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding warrants could force Public Shareholders to (i) exercise their warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time
when it may be disadvantageous for them to do so, (ii) sell their warrants at the then-current market price when they might otherwise wish to hold their warrants or (iii) accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding
warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of their warrants. The Forward Purchase Warrants are redeemable on the same terms as the warrants offered as part of the units sold in our Initial Public
Offering. None of the Private Placement Warrants will be redeemable by us for cash so long as they are held by their initial purchasers or their permitted transferees.
In addition, we have the ability to redeem the outstanding warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.10 per warrant if, among other things, the Reference Value
equals or exceeds $10.00 per share (as adjusted for share sub-divisions, share capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like). In such a case, the holders will be able to exercise their warrants prior to redemption for a number
of our Class A Ordinary Shares determined based on the redemption date and the fair market value of our Class A Ordinary Shares. The value received upon exercise of the warrants (1) may be less than the value the holders would have received if
they had exercised their warrants at a later time where the underlying share price is higher and (2) may not compensate the holders for the value of the warrants, including because the number of Ordinary Shares received is capped at 0.361 of our
Class A Ordinary Shares per warrant (subject to adjustment) irrespective of the remaining life of the warrants.
Our warrants may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares and make it more difficult to effectuate our Partnering Transaction.
We issued warrants to purchase 9,363,333 Class A Ordinary Shares as part of the units offered in our Initial Public Offering and, simultaneously with the closing of our Initial Public Offering, we issued in a private
placement an aggregate of 5,412,000 Private Placement Warrants each exercisable to purchase one Class A ordinary share at $11.50 per share. We may also issue up to 3,333,333 Forward Purchase Warrants pursuant to the Forward Purchase Agreements,
if any. In addition, if our Sponsor or an affiliate of our Sponsor or certain of our officers and directors makes any working capital loans, such lender may convert those loans into up to an additional 1,500,000 Private Placement Warrants, at the
price of $1.50 per private placement warrant. To the extent we issue Class A Ordinary Shares to effectuate a business transaction, the potential for the issuance of a substantial number of additional Class A Ordinary Shares upon exercise of these
warrants could make us a less attractive acquisition vehicle to a partnering candidate. Such warrants, when exercised, will increase the number of issued and outstanding Class A Ordinary Shares and reduce the value of the Class A Ordinary Shares
issued to complete the business transaction. Therefore, our warrants may make it more difficult to effectuate a business transaction or increase the cost of acquiring the partnering candidate.
Our warrants are accounted for as a warrant liability and were recorded at fair value upon issuance with changes in fair value each period reported in earnings, which may have
an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares or may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial Partnering Transaction.
Following the consummation of our Initial Public Offering and the concurrent issuance of the Private Placement Warrants to our Sponsor, we accounted for the 14,775,333 warrants issued in connection with our Initial
Public Offering in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40. Such guidance provides that because our warrants do not meet the criteria for equity treatment thereunder, each warrant must be recorded as a liability. Accordingly, we
classified each of the warrants as a liability at its fair value which will be estimated using an internal valuation model. Our valuation model utilizes inputs such as assumed share prices, volatility, discount factors and other assumptions and
may not be reflective of the price at which such warrants can be settled. The impact of changes in the fair value of our warrants on our earnings may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. In addition,
potential targets may seek a blank check company that does not have warrants that are accounted for as a warrant liability, which may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial Partnering Transaction with a target business.
Because each unit contains one-third of one warrant and only a whole warrant may be exercised, the units may be worth less than units of other special purpose acquisition
companies.
Each unit contains one-third of one warrant. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, no fractional warrants will be issued upon separation of the units, and only whole units will trade. If, upon exercise of the warrants,
a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, we will, upon exercise, round down to the nearest whole number the number of Class A Ordinary Shares to be issued to the warrant holder. This is different from other
offerings similar to ours whose units include one share and one warrant to purchase one whole share. We have established the components of the units in this way in order to reduce the dilutive effect of the warrants upon completion of a
Partnering Transaction since the warrants will be exercisable in the aggregate for one-third of the number of shares compared to units that each contain a whole warrant to purchase one share, thus making us, we believe, a more attractive merger
partner for partnering candidates. Nevertheless, this unit structure may cause our units to be worth less than if it included a warrant to purchase one whole share.
Risks Relating to our Sponsor and Management Team
Past performance by our management team and their affiliates may not be indicative of future performance of an investment in us.
Information regarding performance by, or businesses associated with, our management team, or businesses associated with them, is presented for informational purposes only. Past performance by our management team is
not a guarantee either (i) of success with respect to any Partnering Transaction we may consummate or (ii) that we will be able to locate a suitable candidate for our Partnering Transaction. Public Shareholders should not rely on the historical
record of the performance of our management team or businesses associated with them, as indicative of our future performance of an investment in us or the returns we will, or is likely to, generate going forward.
We may seek Partnering Transaction opportunities in industries or sectors that may be outside of our management’s areas of expertise.
We will consider a Partnering Transaction outside of our management’s areas of expertise if a Partnering Transaction candidate is presented to us and we determine that such candidate offers an attractive Partnering
Transaction opportunity for our company. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in any particular Partnering Transaction candidate, we cannot assure Public Shareholders that we will adequately ascertain or assess all
of the significant risk factors. We also cannot assure Public Shareholders that an investment in our units will not ultimately prove to be less favorable to them in our Initial Public Offering than a direct investment, if an opportunity were
available, in a Partnering Transaction candidate.
We are dependent upon our executive officers and directors and their loss could adversely affect our ability to operate.
Our operations are dependent upon a relatively small group of individuals and, in particular, our executive officers and directors. We believe that our success depends on the continued service of our officers and
directors, at least until we have completed our Partnering Transaction. In addition, our executive officers and directors are not required to commit any specified amount of time to our affairs and, accordingly, will have conflicts of interest in
allocating their time among various business activities, including identifying potential Partnering Transactions and monitoring the related due diligence. We do not have an employment agreement with, or key-man insurance on the life of, any of
our directors or executive officers. The unexpected loss of the services of one or more of our directors or executive officers could have a detrimental effect on us.
Our ability to successfully effect our Partnering Transaction and to be successful thereafter will be dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel, some of whom may join us
following our Partnering Transaction. The loss of key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
Our ability to successfully effect our Partnering Transaction is dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel. The role of our key personnel in the partnering candidate, however, cannot presently be ascertained.
Although some of our key personnel may remain with the partnering candidate in senior management or advisory positions following our Partnering Transaction, it is likely that some or all of the management of the partnering candidate will remain
in place. While we intend to closely scrutinize any individuals we engage after our Partnering Transaction, we cannot assure Public Shareholders that our assessment of these individuals will prove to be correct. These individuals may be
unfamiliar with the requirements of operating a company regulated by the SEC, which could cause us to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar with such requirements.
Our key personnel may negotiate employment or consulting agreements with a partnering candidate in connection with a particular Partnering Transaction, and a particular
Partnering Transaction may be conditioned on the retention or resignation of such key personnel. These agreements may provide for them to receive compensation following our Partnering Transaction and as a result, may cause them to have conflicts
of interest in determining whether a particular Partnering Transaction is the most advantageous.
Our key personnel may be able to remain with our company after the completion of our Partnering Transaction only if they are able to negotiate employment or consulting agreements in connection with the Partnering
Transaction. Such negotiations would take place simultaneously with the negotiation of the Partnering Transaction and could provide for such individuals to receive compensation in the form of cash payments and/or our securities for services they
would render to us after the completion of the Partnering Transaction. Such negotiations also could make such key personnel’s retention or resignation a condition to any such agreement. The personal and financial interests of such individuals may
influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a partnering candidate, subject to their fiduciary duties under Cayman Islands law.
We may have a limited ability to assess the management of a prospective partnering candidate and, as a result, may affect our Partnering Transaction with a partnering
candidate whose management may not have the skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company.
When evaluating the desirability of effecting our Partnering Transaction with a prospective partnering candidate, our ability to assess the partnering candidate’s management may be limited due to a lack of time,
resources or information. Our assessment of the capabilities of the partnering candidate’s management, therefore, may prove to be incorrect and such management may lack the skills, qualifications or abilities we suspected. Should the partnering
candidate’s management not possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to manage a public company, the operations and profitability of the post-combination business may be negatively impacted. Accordingly, any shareholders or
warrant holders who choose to remain shareholders or warrant holders following the Partnering Transaction could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such shareholders or warrant holders are unlikely to have a remedy for such
reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim
under securities laws that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the Partnering Transaction contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.
The officers and directors of an acquisition candidate may resign upon completion of our Partnering Transaction. The loss of a partnering candidate’s key personnel could
negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
The role of an acquisition candidate’s key personnel upon the completion of our Partnering Transaction cannot be ascertained at this time. Although we contemplate that certain members of an acquisition candidate’s
management team will remain associated with the acquisition candidate following our Partnering Transaction, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not wish to remain in place.
Our executive officers and directors will allocate their time to other businesses thereby causing conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time to devote to
our affairs. This conflict of interest could have a negative impact on our ability to complete our Partnering Transaction.
Our executive officers and directors are not required to, and will not, commit their full time to our affairs, which may result in a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our operations and our search
for a Partnering Transaction and their other businesses. We do not intend to have any full-time employees prior to the completion of our Partnering Transaction. Each of our executive officers and directors is engaged in several other business
endeavors for which he may be entitled to substantial compensation, and our executive officers and directors are not obligated to contribute any specific number of hours per week to our affairs. Our independent directors also serve as officers
and board members for other entities. If our executive officers’ and directors’ other business affairs require them to devote substantial amounts of time to such affairs in excess of their current commitment levels, it could limit their ability
to devote time to our affairs which may have a negative impact on our ability to complete our Partnering Transaction. For a complete discussion of our executive officers’ and directors’ other business affairs, please see “Directors, Executive
Officers and Corporate Governance—Officers and Directors.”
Our officers and directors presently have, and any of them in the future may have, additional, fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities and, accordingly, may
have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.
Until we consummate our Partnering Transaction, we intend to engage in the business of identifying and combining with one or more businesses. Each of our officers and directors presently has, and any of them in the
future may have, additional fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities pursuant to which such officer or director is or will be required to present a Partnering Transaction opportunity to such entity subject to their fiduciary duties
under Cayman Islands law. Accordingly, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. These conflicts may not be resolved in our favor and a potential partnering candidate
may be presented to another entity prior to its presentation to us.
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law: (i) no individual serving as a director or an officer shall have any duty, except, and
to the extent expressly assumed by contract, to refrain from engaging directly or indirectly in the same or similar business activities or lines of business as us; and (ii) we renounce any interest or expectancy in, or in being offered an
opportunity to participate in, any potential transaction or matter which may be a corporate opportunity for any director or officer, on the one hand, and us, on the other.
For a complete discussion of our executive officers’ and directors’ business affiliations and the potential conflicts of interest that Public Shareholders should be aware of, please see “Directors, Executive Officers
and Corporate Governance—Officers and Directors,” “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Conflicts of Interest” and “Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions, and Director Independence.”
Our executive officers, directors, security holders and their respective affiliates may have competitive pecuniary interests that conflict with our interests.
We have not adopted a policy that expressly prohibits our directors, executive officers, security holders or affiliates from having a direct or indirect pecuniary or financial interest in any investment to be
acquired or disposed of by us or in any transaction to which we are a party or have an interest. In fact, we may enter into a Partnering Transaction with a partnering candidate that is affiliated with our Sponsor, our directors or executive
officers, although we do not intend to do so, or we may acquire a partnering candidate through an affiliated joint acquisition with one or more affiliates of Corsair Capital and/or one or more investors in Corsair Capital or one of its
affiliates. Nor do we have a policy that expressly prohibits any such persons from engaging for their own account in business activities of the types conducted by us. Accordingly, such persons or entities may have a conflict between their
interests and ours.
The personal and financial interests of our directors and officers may influence their motivation in timely identifying and selecting a partnering candidate and completing a Partnering Transaction. Consequently, our
directors’ and officers’ discretion in identifying and selecting a suitable partnering candidate may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether the terms, conditions and timing of a particular Partnering Transaction are appropriate
and in our shareholders’ best interest. If this were the case, it would be a breach of their fiduciary duties to us as a matter of Cayman Islands law and we or our shareholders might have a claim against such individuals for infringing on our
shareholders’ rights. However, we might not ultimately be successful in any claim we may make against them for such reason.
We may engage in a Partnering Transaction with one or more partnering candidates that have relationships with entities that may be affiliated with our Sponsor, executive
officers, directors or existing holders which may raise potential conflicts of interest.
In light of the involvement of our Sponsor, executive officers and directors with other entities, we may decide to acquire one or more businesses affiliated with our Sponsor, executive officers, directors or existing
holders. Our directors also serve as officers and board members for other entities, including, without limitation, those described under “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Conflicts
of Interest.” Such entities may compete with us for Partnering Transaction opportunities. Our Sponsor, officers and directors are not currently aware of any specific opportunities for us to complete our Partnering Transaction with any entities
with which they are affiliated, and there have been no substantive discussions concerning a Partnering Transaction with any such entity or entities. Although we will not be specifically focusing on, or targeting, any transaction with any
affiliated entities, we would pursue such a transaction if we determined that such affiliated entity met our criteria for a Partnering Transaction as set forth in “Business—Effecting Our Partnering
Transaction” and such transaction was approved by a majority of our independent and disinterested directors. Despite our agreement to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or an independent accounting firm regarding the
fairness to our company from a financial point of view of a Partnering Transaction with one or more domestic or international businesses affiliated with our Sponsor, executive officers, directors or existing holders, potential conflicts of
interest still may exist and, as a result, the terms of the Partnering Transaction may not be as advantageous to our Public Shareholders as they would be absent any conflicts of interest.
Moreover, we may pursue an affiliated joint acquisition opportunity with one or more affiliates of Corsair Capital and/or one or more investors in Corsair Capital or one of its affiliates. Any such parties may
co-invest with us in the partnering candidate at the time of our Partnering Transaction, or we could raise additional funds to complete the Partnering Transaction by issuing to such parties a class of equity or Equity-Linked Securities.
Accordingly, such persons or entities may have a conflict between their interests and ours.
Since our Sponsor, executive officers and directors will lose their entire investment in us if our Partnering Transaction is not completed (other than with respect to Public
Shares they may acquire), a conflict of interest may arise in determining whether a particular partnering candidate is appropriate for our Partnering Transaction.
On January 8, 2021, one of our affiliates purchased an aggregate of (a) 2,300,000 Founder Shares in exchange for a capital contribution of $6,250, or approximately $0.0027 per share and (b) 120,000 Performance Shares
for a capital contribution of $18,750, or approximately $0.1563 per share, and on January 21, 2021 (x) exchanged 130,000 Founder Shares on a one for one basis for Performance Shares and (y) surrendered 157,500 Founder Shares. Such Founder Shares
and Performance Shares were assigned to our Sponsor on January 28, 2021. On April 30, 2021, our Sponsor surrendered 575,000 Founder Shares for no consideration, such that as of June 30, 2021, there were 1,437,500 Founder Shares and 250,000
Performance Shares issued and outstanding. On July 15, 2021, the underwriter purchased an additional 3,090,000 Units pursuant to the partial exercise of the over-allotment option. As a result, the Sponsor subsequently forfeited 33,000 Class F
Ordinary Shares on July 15, 2021. The Founder Shares will be worthless if we do not complete a Partnering Transaction. In addition, our Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 5,412,000 Private Placement Warrants for an aggregate purchase price of
$8,118,000, or $1.50 per private placement warrant. The Private Placement Warrants will also be worthless if we do not complete our Partnering Transaction. The personal and financial interests of our executive officers and directors may influence
their motivation in identifying and selecting a Partnering Transaction, completing a Partnering Transaction and influencing the operation of the business following the Partnering Transaction. This risk may become more acute as the 24-month
anniversary of the closing of our Initial Public Offering nears, which is the deadline for our completion of a Partnering Transaction.
We may be a passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,” which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. investors.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year (or portion thereof) that is included in the holding period of a U.S. Holder of our Class A Ordinary Shares or warrants, the U.S. Holder may be subject to adverse U.S. federal
income tax consequences and may be subject to additional reporting requirements. Our PFIC status for our current and subsequent taxable years may depend on whether we qualify for the PFIC start-up exception. Depending on the particular
circumstances the application of the start-up exception may be subject to uncertainty, and there cannot be any assurance that we will qualify for the start-up exception. Accordingly, there can be no assurances with respect to our status as a PFIC
for our current taxable year or any subsequent taxable year. Our actual PFIC status for any taxable year, however, will not be determinable until after the end of such taxable year (and, in the case of the start-up exception, potentially not
until after the two taxable years following our current taxable year). If we determine we are a PFIC for any taxable year, we expect to provide to a U.S. Holder such information as the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) may require, including a
PFIC Annual Information Statement, in order to enable the U.S. Holder to make and maintain a “qualified electing fund” election, but there can be no assurance that we will provide such required information on a timely basis or at all, and such
election would be unavailable with respect to our warrants in all cases. We urge U.S. investors to consult their tax advisers regarding the possible application of the PFIC rules.
Public Shareholders may be treated as receiving taxable constructive distributions for U.S. federal income tax purposes even though they do not receive a corresponding cash
distribution. In addition, in the event we complete our Partnering Transaction with a U.S. company and certain other conditions are met, non-U.S. investors may be subject to withholding taxes, and we may have withholding obligations, with respect
to any such constructive distribution.
The terms of the warrants provide for an adjustment to the number of Class A Ordinary Shares for which warrants may be exercised or to the exercise price of the warrants in certain events. When certain adjustments
are made, depending on the circumstances, Public Shareholders may be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as receiving a constructive distribution from us even though no cash distributions are made. In addition, it is possible that the
conversion of Performance Shares into Class A Ordinary Shares could similarly result in a constructive distribution to Public Shareholders.
Moreover, if we complete our Partnering Transaction with a U.S. company and certain other conditions are met, non-U.S. investors may be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax in respect of any such constructive
distribution with respect to our warrants or shares, and we or another withholding agent may be liable for any failure to withhold and remit any tax due to the appropriate taxing authority, even though no contemporaneous cash distributions are
made.
General Risk Factors
If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be
restricted, which may make it difficult for us to complete our Partnering Transaction.
If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, our activities may be restricted, including:
|
• |
restrictions on the nature of our investments; and
|
|
• |
restrictions on the issuance of securities,
|
each of which may make it difficult for us to complete our Partnering Transaction. In addition, we may have imposed upon us burdensome requirements, including:
|
• |
registration as an investment company with the SEC;
|
|
• |
adoption of a specific form of corporate structure; and
|
|
• |
reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements and other rules and regulations that we are not subject to.
|
In order not to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, unless we can qualify for an exclusion, we must ensure that we are engaged primarily in a business other than investing,
reinvesting or trading of securities and that our activities do not include investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading “investment securities” constituting more than 40% of our assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash
items) on an unconsolidated basis. Our business will be to identify and complete a Partnering Transaction and thereafter to operate the post-transaction business or assets for the long term. We do not plan to buy businesses or assets with a view
to resale or profit from their resale. We do not plan to buy unrelated businesses or assets or to be a passive investor.
We do not believe that our anticipated principal activities will subject us to the Investment Company Act. To this end, the cash held in the trust account may only be invested in United States “government securities”
within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act having a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under the Investment Company Act which invest only in
direct U.S. government treasury obligations. Pursuant to the trust agreement, the trustee is not permitted to invest in other securities or assets. By restricting the investment of the cash held in the trust account to these instruments, and by
having a business plan targeted at acquiring and growing businesses for the long term (rather than on buying and selling businesses in the manner of a merchant bank or private equity fund), we intend to avoid being deemed an “investment company”
within the meaning of the Investment Company Act. Our Initial Public Offering was not intended for persons who are seeking a return on investments in government securities or investment securities. The trust account is intended as a holding place
for funds pending the earliest to occur of either: (i) the completion of our Partnering Transaction; (ii) the redemption of any Public Shares properly tendered in connection with a shareholder vote to amend our Amended and Restated Memorandum and
Articles of Association to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our Public Shares if we do not complete our Partnering Transaction by July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable); and (iii) absent a Partnering
Transaction by July 6, 2023 (or October 6, 2023, as applicable) or with respect to any other material provisions relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-Partnering Transaction activity, our return of the funds held in the trust account to our
Public Shareholders as part of our redemption of the Public Shares. If we do not invest the cash held in the trust account as discussed above, we may be deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act. If we were deemed to be subject to the
Investment Company Act, compliance with these additional regulatory burdens would require additional expenses for which we have not allotted funds and may hinder our ability to complete a Partnering Transaction. If we do not complete our
Partnering Transaction, our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
Changes in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely affect our business, including our ability to negotiate and complete our
Partnering Transaction, and results of operations.
We are subject to laws and regulations enacted by national, regional and local governments. In particular, we will be required to comply with certain SEC and other legal requirements. Compliance with, and monitoring
of, applicable laws and regulations may be difficult, time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and application may also change from time to time and those changes could have a material adverse effect on our
business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and applied, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our ability to negotiate and
complete our Partnering Transaction, and results of operations.
We are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent accounting or investment banking firm, and consequently, Public Shareholders may have no assurance from an
independent source that the price we are paying for the business is fair to our shareholders from a financial point of view.
Unless we complete our Partnering Transaction with an affiliated entity, we are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent accounting firm or independent investment banking firm that the price we are
paying is fair to our shareholders from a financial point of view. If no opinion is obtained, our shareholders will be relying on the judgment of our board of directors, who will determine fair market value based on standards generally accepted
by the financial community. Such standards used will be disclosed in our proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, related to our Partnering Transaction.
We are an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure
requirements available to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.
We are an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to
other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor internal controls attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure
obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute
payments not previously approved. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years, although circumstances could cause us to lose that
status earlier, including if the market value of our Class A Ordinary Shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 before that time, in which case we would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following
December 31. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading
prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had
a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company
can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition
period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the
new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period
difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
Additionally, we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other
things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which (1) the market value of our Class A Ordinary Shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $250
million as of the prior June 30th, or (2) our annual revenues exceeded $100 million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our Class A Ordinary Shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th. To
the extent we take advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison of our financial statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.
Because we are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, Public Shareholders may face difficulties in protecting their interests, and their ability to protect their
rights through the U.S. Federal courts may be limited.
We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. As a result, it may be difficult for Public Shareholders to effect service of process within the United States upon our directors or
officers, or enforce judgments obtained in the United States courts against our directors or officers.
Our corporate affairs will be governed by our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, the Companies Act (as the same may be supplemented or amended from time to time) and the common law of the
Cayman Islands. We will also be subject to the federal securities laws of the United States. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to
us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from
English common law, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are
different from what they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different body of securities laws as compared to the United States, and certain states,
such as Delaware, may have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholders derivative action in a Federal court of the United States.
We have been advised by Maples and Calder (Cayman) LLP, our Cayman Islands legal counsel, that the courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely (i) to recognize or enforce against us judgments of courts of the United
States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state; and (ii) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, to impose liabilities against us predicated upon the civil
liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state, so far as the liabilities imposed by those provisions are penal in nature. In those circumstances, although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman
Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, the courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce a foreign money judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without retrial on the merits based on the principle that a
judgment of a competent foreign court imposes upon the judgment debtor an obligation to pay the sum for which judgment has been given provided certain conditions are met. For a foreign judgment to be enforced in the Cayman Islands, such judgment
must be final and conclusive and for a liquidated sum, and must not be in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same matter, impeachable on the grounds of fraud or obtained in a
manner, or be of a kind the enforcement of which is, contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands (awards of punitive or multiple damages may well be held to be contrary to public policy). A Cayman Islands Court may stay
enforcement proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.
As a result of all of the above, Public Shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders
than they would as Public Shareholders of a United States company.
Cyber incidents or attacks directed at us could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or financial loss.
We depend on digital technologies, including information systems, infrastructure and cloud applications and services, including those of third parties with which we may deal. Sophisticated and deliberate attacks on,
or security breaches in, our systems or infrastructure, or the systems or infrastructure of third parties or the cloud, could lead to corruption or misappropriation of our assets, proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data. As an
early stage company without significant investments in data security protection, we may not be sufficiently protected against such occurrences. We may not have sufficient resources to adequately protect against, or to investigate and remediate
any vulnerability to, cyber incidents. It is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them, could have adverse consequences on our business and lead to financial loss.
We are a company with no operating history and no revenues established for the purpose of identifying a company to partner with in order to effectuate a merger, share
exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar Partnering Transaction, and Public Shareholders have no basis on which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective.
We are a blank check company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands and all of our activities to date have been related to our formation, our Initial Public Offering and our search for a business
combination target. Because we lack an operating history, Public Shareholders have no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective of completing our initial business combination. If we fail to complete our initial
business combination, we will never generate any operating revenues.
We may reincorporate in another jurisdiction in connection with our Partnering Transaction, and the laws of such jurisdiction may govern some or all of our future material
agreements and we may not be able to enforce our legal rights.
In connection with our Partnering Transaction, we may relocate the home jurisdiction of our business from the Cayman Islands to another jurisdiction. If we determine to do this, the laws of such jurisdiction may
govern some or all of our future material agreements. The system of laws and the enforcement of existing laws in such jurisdiction may not be as certain in implementation and interpretation as in the United States. The inability to enforce or
obtain a remedy under any of our future agreements could result in a significant loss of business, business opportunities or capital.
We employ a mail forwarding service, which may delay or disrupt our ability to receive mail in a timely manner.
Mail addressed to the Company and received at its registered office will be forwarded unopened to the forwarding address supplied by Company to be dealt with. None of the Company, its directors, officers, advisors or
service providers (including the organization which provides registered office services in the Cayman Islands) will bear any responsibility for any delay howsoever caused in mail reaching the forwarding address, which may impair Public
Shareholders’ ability to communicate with us.