Alio Gold Inc. (TSX, NYSE AMERICAN: ALO) (“Alio
Gold” or the “Company”) today reported its second quarter 2018
financial and operational results. The Company will host a
conference call at 11:00am EDT today to discuss the results and the
details of the call can be found at the end of the release.
Second Quarter Overview and Recent
Developments
- Completed the acquisition of Rye Patch Gold, including the
Florida Canyon Mine, on May 25, 2018
- Produced 19,190 ounces1 of gold at an all-in sustaining cost1,2
(“AISC”) of $1,314 per ounce
- Updated Mineral Reserve5 estimate at the San Francisco Mine
shows proven and probable mineral reserves were 854,472 ounces of
gold (55.5 million tonnes at 0.49 g/t gold) as of July 1, 2018
- Implemented interim mine plan at San Francisco to slow waste
stripping rates and focus on profitable production while
negotiating with mining contractor
- Suspended development work at the Ana Paula project temporarily
to focus capital expenditures on operating mines
- Restructured debt facility with Macquarie Bank
“We were pleased to complete the acquisition of
Rye Patch Gold during the quarter, adding a second operating mine
to our portfolio,” said Greg McCunn, Chief Executive Officer. “With
two similar open pit, heap leach operations we believe that we will
be able to leverage our expertise across the mines to focus on
improving the operations to deliver cash flow. Disciplined capital
allocation is a priority, particularly in the current gold price
environment. As a result, we have made the decision to temporarily
suspend development work at Ana Paula while we focus on improving
our operations to unlock opportunities to increase efficiencies,
lower costs and generate cash flow.
At the San Francisco Mine we are negotiating
with our mining contractor to slow down the waste stripping on
Phases 6 and 7 and reduce the mining rate to focus on generating
cash flow in the current gold price environment.
The Florida Canyon Mine continues to ramp-up
subsequent to the re-start of the mine last year. With the
integration underway we are in the early stages of assessing the
site’s systems, processes and capabilities to ensure we are able to
execute on the revised mine plan that will be detailed in an
updated 43-101 technical report. The report is expected to be
completed by the end of 2018 and we anticipate that the report will
include an update to the reserves and resources and an analysis of
various opportunities to increase production and lower costs.
As a result of the changes at the San Francisco
Mine we will not meet our guidance for 2018 of between 90,000 and
100,000 ounces of gold production. With work continuing at Florida
Canyon on an updated mine plan we do not expect to provide
production and cost guidance for the remainder of 2018. Our focus
is on improving operations at these two assets to generate cash
flow and develop a fully executable plan for 2019.”
Mining and Processing
($ thousands, except where indicated) |
Three months endedJune 30 |
Six months ended June
30 |
2018* |
2017 |
2018* |
2017 |
Gold sold (ounces) |
|
20,126 |
|
|
21,495 |
|
37,575 |
|
|
47,544 |
Silver sold (ounces) |
|
13,334 |
|
|
10,332 |
|
19,160 |
|
|
22,231 |
Metal revenues |
$ |
26,233 |
|
|
27,069 |
|
49,571 |
|
|
59,375 |
Production costs, excl. depreciation and depletion |
$ |
20,700 |
|
|
16,071 |
|
36,214 |
|
|
35,433 |
Net earnings (loss) from operations |
$ |
(106 |
) |
|
7,751 |
|
3,545 |
|
|
17,531 |
Net earnings (loss) |
$ |
3,284 |
|
|
3,512 |
|
6,514 |
|
|
9,554 |
Net earnings (loss) per share, basic |
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
0.10 |
|
0.12 |
|
|
0.27 |
Cash flows from operating activities** |
$ |
(8,290 |
) |
|
2,772 |
|
(10,116 |
) |
|
12,515 |
By-product cash costs3 (per ounce) |
$ |
1,018 |
|
|
740 |
|
956 |
|
|
737 |
AISC2 (per ounce) |
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
954 |
|
1,290 |
|
|
896 |
Average realized gold price per gold ounce |
$ |
1,293 |
|
|
1,252 |
|
1,311 |
|
|
1,241 |
* Figures include Florida Canyon financial and operational data
from May 25, 2018 to June 30, 2018** After changes in non-cash
working capital
Financial performance
Metal revenues decreased to $26.2 million
compared to $27.1 million during Q2 2017, as a result of fewer
ounces sold.
Production costs, which comprise the full cost
of operations excluding depreciation and depletion, form a
component of cost of sales and increased to $20.7 million compared
to $16.1 million during Q2 2017. The increase was primarily as a
result of increased tonnage moved at the San Francisco pit,
increase in cyanide consumption and additional costs from Florida
Canyon.
Depletion and depreciation costs were $1.2
million compared to $0.8 million during Q2 2017.
Earnings for the Company were $3.3 million, or
$0.05 per share compared to $3.5 million, or $0.10 per share during
Q2 2017. The decrease was primarily a result of lower earnings from
operations.
Corporate and administrative expenses increased
to $4.4 million compared to $2.5 million during Q2 2017 as a result
primarily of Rye Patch transaction costs.
Cash used by operating activities was $8.3
million compared to cash provided by operating activities of $2.8
million during Q2 2017. The decrease was primarily due to a
reduction in trade payables and an increase in income taxes
paid.
Cash and cash equivalents, and short-term
investments at June 30, 2018, were $29.7 million. During the
quarter, the Company used $8.3 million in cash from operations. At
the San Francisco Mine the Company invested $3.3 million. At the
Ana Paula Project the Company invested $4.7 million. The Company
also incurred $1.9 million of expenditures related to the Rye Patch
transaction and received $11.0 million from the Rye Patch
acquisition.
Working capital4 at June 30, 2018 was $78.2
million.
San Francisco Mine (100%-owned)
The San Francisco Mine produced 14,466 gold
ounces and 7,661 silver ounces compared to 22,011 gold ounces and
10,332 silver ounces during Q2 2017. Gold and silver production was
lower as a result of fewer ounces deposited and lower recoveries on
the heap leach pads.
The Mine’s by-product cash cost was $950 per
ounce while AISC was $1,172 per ounce. During Q2 2017 by-product
cash cost was $740 per ounce and AISC was $870 per ounce. The
increase in cash cost and AISC was due to an increase in tonnage
mined and fewer ounces produced.
The dual cut-off strategy deployed in January
2018 to increase the grade of crusher feed ore has not been
successful as crusher feed grade in Q2 2018 was 0.46 g/t compared
to a plan of 0.59 g/t. The underperformance of gold grade is due to
higher than expected levels of dilution which may partly be
attributable to increased blast movement due to finer blasting, as
well as to ore control modeling. In May 2018, an updated resource
model was prepared for San Francisco as well as refined ore control
modelling techniques. In June and July 2018, crusher feed is
tracking closely to grades predicted by the new ore control model.
The Company has initiated a full technical review of the pit
operations at San Francisco and expects to refine its operations
over the remainder of the year.
While the technical review is underway, the
Company has developed an interim mine plan which reduces capital
stripping and focuses mining on more profitable ounces to maintain
cash neutral operations. The interim mine plan is subject to
negotiations with the mining contractor. As a result of the reduced
capital stripping, access to ore will be limited during the second
half of the year and production guidance of 90,000 to 100,000
ounces of gold for 2018 will not be met.
The Mineral Reserve estimates at San Francisco
from April 1, 2017 was updated as of July 1, 2018 utilizing the
latest available information, including mining depletion over the
period and infill and grade-control drilling carried out as part of
the mining operations during the period. Mining depletion of
Mineral Reserves was partly offset by expansion of the reserves in
Phases 6 through 9 of the San Francisco Pit. Total proven and
probable mineral reserves totaled 854,472 ounces of gold (55.5
million tonnes at 0.49 g/t) as of July 1, 2018, an approximate
decrease of 74,228 ounces of gold or 8% from April 1, 2017.
The complete mineral reserve and mineral
resource data can be found at the end of this news release.
Florida Canyon Mine (100%-owned)
The Florida Canyon Mine produced 4,724 gold
ounces and 4,142 silver ounces subsequent to the completion of the
acquisition of Rye Patch Gold on May 25, 2018. The gold and silver
production for the full Q2 2018 was 11,587 ounces and 8,734 ounces,
respectively, compared to 10,846 ounces and 5,709 ounces,
respectively in Q1 2018.
Updated 43-101 Technical
Report
An updated National Instrument 43-101 technical
report (“43-101”) for Florida Canyon is expected to be completed by
the end of 2018. The 43-101 will incorporate all the drilling to
date and further metallurgical testwork will be undertaken with the
expectation of converting a portion of the mineral resources into
mineral reserves. The 43-101 will also study various optimization
initiatives that may provide a positive return on capital, which
may include:
- upgrading and improving the crushing circuit
- increasing pumping capacity
- optimizing pit sequencing, including the Radio Tower pit,
and
- expanding the heap leach pad.
Radio Tower Access
The Company continues to advance discussions
with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Union Pacific
Railway (UP), Pershing County and a local radio station to remove
two communication towers located on the Radio Tower portion of the
Florida Canyon orebody. The FAA tower is in the process of being
decommissioned and is expected to be dismantled and removed by the
end of 2018. A new location for the UP tower has been selected and
the permitting and design work is underway with removal expected by
the end of 2018. Sites for the Pershing county communication
station and local radio station have been selected and are being
readied for relocation. The result of the removal of the
communication towers will be access to the, currently expected,
highest-grade portion of the Florida Canyon orebody.
Ana Paula Project
(100%-owned)
All development work including the construction
of the underground decline, the completion of the definitive
feasibility study and the undertaking of further exploration work
have been temporarily suspended as a result of the recent decline
in the gold price and the integration of the Florida Canyon Mine.
The Company’s focus in the near-term will be on allocating capital
as required to it’s two operating mines.
Macquarie Debt Facility
The Company restructured the existing debt
facility, with Macquarie Bank Limited (“Macquarie”), which was
scheduled to be repaid in December 2018. As of June 30, 2018 the
outstanding principal of $15 million will be repaid, in twelve
quarterly payments of $1.25 million in principal together with
accrued interest, ending in June 2021. The first principal and
interest payment will be made September 30, 2018. The facility has
an interest rate of LIBOR + 8% and is secured by a general security
agreement and guarantee by Alio Gold.
Conference Call
The Company will release its 2018 second quarter
results prior to the market open on August 10, 2018, followed by a
conference call and webcast at 11:00am (EDT).
Second
quarter 2018 conference call and webcast details: |
Date: |
|
Friday, August 10,
2018 |
Time: |
|
11:00am (EDT) |
Toll Free (US and
Canada): |
|
(855) 427-9509 |
Outside North
America: |
|
(210) 229-8822 |
Conference ID: |
|
7099318 |
Webcast: |
|
https://edge.media-server.com/m6/p/p84uiih9 |
Replay: |
|
To be available at
http://www.aliogold.com |
Please refer to the Company's financial
statements, related notes and accompanying Management Discussion
and Analysis for a full review of the San Francisco and Florida
Canyon operations and Ana Paula project. This can be viewed on the
Company’s website at www.aliogold.com, on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
About Alio Gold
Alio Gold is a growth-oriented gold mining
company, focused on exploration, development and production in
Mexico and the USA. Its principal assets include its
100%-owned and operating San Francisco Mine in Sonora, Mexico, its
100%-owned and operating Florida Canyon Mine in Nevada, USA and its
100%-owned development stage Ana Paula Project in Guerrero, Mexico.
The Company also has a portfolio of other exploration properties
located in Mexico and the USA.
Footnotes:
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
|
Production and costs
include the San Francisco Mine and, for the period of May 25, 2018
to June 30, 2018, the Florida Canyon Mine |
|
|
|
|
2) |
|
|
Non-GAAP Measure:
All-in sustaining cost per gold ounceThe Company has adopted an
all-in sustaining cost per ounce on a by-product basis performance
measure which is calculated based on the guidance note issued by
the World Gold Council. Management uses this information as an
additional measure to evaluate the Company’s performance and
ability to generate cash.All-in sustaining costs on a by-product
basis include total production cash costs, corporate and
administrative expenses, sustaining capital expenditures and
accretion for site reclamation and closure costs. These reclamation
and closure costs represent the gradual unwinding of the discounted
liability to rehabilitate the area around the mine at the end of
the mine life. The Company believes this measure to be
representative of the total costs associated with producing gold;
however, this performance measure has no standardized meaning. As
such, there are likely to be differences in the method of
computation when compared to similar measures presented by other
issuers.The following table provides a reconciliation of the all-in
sustaining cost per gold ounce on a by-product basis to the
consolidated financial statements for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2018: |
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
Production costs |
$ |
20,700 |
|
$ |
16,071 |
|
$ |
36,214 |
|
$ |
35,433 |
|
Corporate and administrative expenses (1) |
|
2,476 |
|
|
1,748 |
|
|
4,589 |
|
|
3,073 |
|
Sustaining capital expenditures (2) |
|
3,344 |
|
|
2,799 |
|
|
7,758 |
|
|
4,360 |
|
Accretion for site reclamation and closure |
|
141 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
217 |
|
|
114 |
|
Less: By-product silver credits |
|
(217 |
) |
|
(172 |
) |
|
(310 |
) |
|
(380 |
) |
All-in
sustaining costs |
|
26,444 |
|
|
20,503 |
|
|
48,468 |
|
|
42,600 |
|
Divided by gold sold (ozs) |
|
20,126 |
|
|
21,495 |
|
|
37,575 |
|
|
47,544 |
|
All-in sustaining cost per gold ounce on a by-product
basis |
$ |
1,314 |
|
$ |
954 |
|
$ |
1,290 |
|
$ |
896 |
|
|
(1) |
|
Corporate and
administrative expenses have been adjusted for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2018, to remove Rye Patch transaction costs
of $1.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2018, sustaining capital expenditures include
deferred stripping of $2.5 million and $5.2 million, respectively
(three and six months ended June 30, 2017 - $0.7 million and $0.9
million, respectively). |
3) |
|
|
Non-GAAP Measure: Cash cost per gold ounce and cash cost per gold
ounce on a by-product basisCash cost per gold ounce and cash cost
per gold ounce on a by-product basis are non-GAAP performance
measures that management uses to assess the Company’s performance
and its expected future performance. The Company has included the
non-GAAP performance measures of cash cost per gold ounce and cash
cost per gold ounce on a by-product basis throughout this document.
In the gold mining industry, these are common performance measures
but they do not have any standardized meaning. As such, they are
unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other
issuers.Management believes that, in addition to conventional
measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, certain investors use
this information to evaluate the Company’s performance and ability
to generate cash flow. Accordingly, presentation of these measures
is to provide additional information and should not be considered
in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance
prepared in accordance with GAAP.The cash cost per gold ounce is
calculated by dividing the operating production costs by the total
number of gold ounces sold. The cash cost per gold ounce on a
by-product basis is calculated by deducting the by-product silver
credits per gold ounce sold from the cash cost per gold ounce. The
following table provides a reconciliation of the cash cost per gold
ounce and cash cost per gold ounce on a by-product basis to the
consolidated financial statements for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2018: |
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2017 |
|
Production costs |
$ |
20,700 |
|
$ |
16,071 |
|
$ |
36,214 |
|
$ |
35,443 |
|
Divided by gold sold (ozs) |
|
20,126 |
|
|
21,495 |
|
|
37,575 |
|
|
47,544 |
|
Cash cost per gold ounce |
|
1,029 |
|
|
748 |
|
|
964 |
|
|
745 |
|
Less: By-product silver credits per gold ounce (1) |
|
(11 |
) |
|
(8 |
) |
|
(8 |
) |
|
(8 |
) |
Cash cost per gold ounce on a by-product
basis |
$ |
1,018 |
|
$ |
740 |
|
$ |
956 |
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
(1) |
|
Management determined
that silver metal revenues, when compared to gold metal revenues,
are immaterial and therefore considered a by-product of the
production of gold. For the three and six months ended June 30,
2018, total by-product silver credits were $0.2 million and $0.3
million, respectively (three months and six months ended June 30,
2017 - $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For further
details on the calculation of production costs, refer to the notes
to the consolidated financial statements for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2018. Cash cost per gold ounce and cash cost
per gold ounce on a by-product basis are not necessarily indicative
of earnings from operations or cash flow from operations as
determined under GAAP. Other companies may calculate these measures
differently. |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Working
capital is calculated by deducting current liabilities from current
assets. |
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Mineral
reserves and mineral resources as of July 1, 2018: |
Reserves and Resources
Tables
Proven and probable in-situ gold ounces as of April 1,
2017 |
928,700 |
Mined ounces depleted from reserves (April 1, 2017 to July 1,
2018) |
-136,000 |
Additions from discovered ounces and converted resources |
+74,000 |
Other net changes within resource/reserve estimation |
-12,228 |
Proven and probable in-situ gold ounces as of July 1,
2018 |
854,472 |
ALIO GOLD INC.SAN
FRANCISCO MINE: GOLD RESERVES AND RESOURCES
As of July 1, 2018
|
Proven |
Probable |
Proven & Probable |
|
MetricTonnes |
Aug/t |
Contained Au Ounces |
Metric Tonnes |
Aug/t |
Contained Au Ounces |
Metric Tonnes |
Aug/t |
Contained Au Ounces |
San Francisco |
17,757,023 |
0.518 |
273,741 |
23,359,785 |
0.540 |
405,239 |
41,116,808 |
0.514 |
678,980 |
La Chicharra Pit |
5,328,803 |
0.522 |
89,489 |
1,835,220 |
0.437 |
25,804 |
7,164,023 |
0.501 |
115,292 |
TOTAL |
23,085,826 |
0.489 |
363,230 |
25,195,005 |
0.532 |
431,043 |
48,280,831 |
0.512 |
794,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low-grade stockpile |
7,199,000 |
0.260 |
60,200 |
|
|
|
7,199,000 |
0.260 |
60,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured |
Indicated |
Measured & Indicated |
|
MetricTonnes |
Aug/t |
Contained Au Ounces |
Metric Tonnes |
Aug/t |
Contained Au Ounces |
Metric Tonnes |
Aug/t |
Contained Au Ounces |
San Francisco |
33,041,153 |
0.547 |
580,545 |
38,485,816 |
0.557 |
688,856 |
71,526,969 |
0.552 |
1,269,403 |
La Chicharra Pit |
6,674,718 |
0.550 |
118,028 |
6,019,509 |
0.500 |
96,766 |
12,694,227 |
0.526 |
214,794 |
Total |
39,715,871 |
0.547 |
698,574 |
44,505,325 |
0.549 |
785,621 |
84,221,196 |
0.548 |
1,484,197 |
|
Inferred |
|
MetricTonnes |
Au g/t |
Contained Au Ounces |
San Francisco |
1,725,608 |
0.528 |
29,293 |
La Chicharra Pit |
222,238 |
0.462 |
3,301 |
Total |
1,947,846 |
0.520 |
32,594 |
Figures may not total due to
rounding
Alio Gold Reserve and Resource Reporting
Notes as of July 1, 2018:
- All Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources have been calculated
in accordance with the standards of the Canadian Institute of
Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum and National Instrument 43-101, or
the AusIMM JORC equivalent.
- All Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral
Reserves.
- Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability.
- Mineral Reserves are estimated using appropriate recovery rates
and US$ commodity prices of $1,250 per ounce of gold
- Mineral Resources are estimated using US$ commodity prices of
$1,350 per ounce of gold
Scientific and technical information contained
in this news release with respect to the San Francisco Mine was
reviewed and approved by Jorge Lozano, a “qualified person” as
defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for
Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). Information regarding data
verification, surveys and investigations, exploration information,
quality assurance programs and quality control measures, and a
summary of sample analytical or testing procedures for the San
Francisco Mine are contained in the Company’s annual information
form for the year ended December 31, 2017, dated March 14, 2018,
and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov (the
“AIF”). Also included in the AIF is a description of the key
assumptions, parameters and methods not included in this news
release that are used to estimate mineral reserves and resources
and a general discussion of the extent to which the estimates may
be affect by any known environmental, permitting, legal, title,
taxation, socio-political, marketing or other relevant factors.
Cautionary Note to United States
Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated and Inferred
Resources
The terms "mineral resource", "measured mineral
resource", "indicated mineral resource", "inferred mineral
resource" used herein are Canadian mining terms used in accordance
with NI 43-101 under the guidelines set out in the Canadian
Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and Petroleum (the "CIM")
Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the
CIM Council, as may be amended from time to time. These definitions
differ from the definitions in the United States Securities &
Exchange Commission ("SEC") Industry Guide 7. In the United States,
a mineral reserve is defined as a part of a mineral deposit which
could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time
the mineral reserve determination is made.
While the terms "mineral resource", "measured
mineral resource," "indicated mineral resource", and "inferred
mineral resource" are recognized and required by Canadian
regulations, they are not defined terms under standards in the
United States and normally are not permitted to be used in reports
and registration statements filed with the SEC. As such,
information contained herein concerning descriptions of
mineralization and resources under Canadian standards may not be
comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies in
SEC filings.
Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves
do not have demonstrated economic viability. With respect to
"indicated mineral resource" and "inferred mineral resource", there
is a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and a great
uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot
be assumed that all or any part of a "measured mineral resource",
"indicated mineral resource" or "inferred mineral resource" will
ever be upgraded to a higher category.
Accordingly, information herein containing
descriptions of our mineral deposits may not be comparable to
similar information made public by US companies subject to the
reporting and disclosure requirements under US federal securities
laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.
Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements and information contained in
this news release constitute “forward-looking statements” within
the meaning of applicable U.S. securities laws and “forward-looking
information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities
laws, which we refer to collectively as “forward-looking
statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements and
information regarding possible events, conditions or results of
operations that are based upon assumptions about future economic
conditions and courses of action. All statements and information
other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking
statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of words such as “seek”, “expect”,
“anticipate”, “budget”, “plan”, “estimate”, “continue”, “forecast”,
“intend”, “believe”, “predict”, “potential”, “target”, “may”,
“could”, “would”, “might”, “will” and similar words or phrases
(including negative variations) suggesting future outcomes or
statements regarding an outlook.
Forward-looking statements in this news release
include, but are not limited to, estimates, forecasts and
statements with respect to project development risks and estimated
future, operations, production and cash costs, including the
Company’s projection that it will not meet its 2018 guidance of
between 90,000 and 100,000 ounces, that it will not be in a
position to provide updated 2018 production and cost guidance in
2018 and that it will provide a fully-executable plan for 2019
operations later in 2018; future trends, plans, strategies,
objectives and expectations, including with respect to operational
efficiencies, cash flow, costs, capital requirements, availability
of financing, production, exploration and reserves and resources;
projected production at the Company’s San Francisco Property,
Florida Canyon Property and Ana Paula Project, including estimated
internal rate of return and projected production, exploitation
activities and potential; the completion, timing, content and
expected results and outcomes of the 43-101 in respect of the
Florida Canyon Mine; the completion, timing and outcome of the
Company’s radio tower removal and relocation operations at the
Florida Canyon Mine site; and future operations and projected
operational updates to the Company’s mineral resource projects, ,
including the Company’s plans to maintain cash neutral operations
by reducing capital stripping and mining rate and refining
operations to focus mining on more profitable ounces at San
Francisco for the remainder of 2018.
Such forward-looking statements are based on a
number of material factors and assumptions, including, but not
limited to: the successful implementation of the Company’s
operational strategies and mine plans and the impact of these
strategies and plans on the Company and its mineral projects,
including the Company’s ability to complete the 43-101 in respect
of the Florida Canyon Mine in accordance with the currently
anticipated specifications and timing; the successful completion of
development projects, planned expansions or other projects within
the timelines anticipated and at anticipated production levels,
including the successful implementation of the Company’s interim
mine plan at the San Francisco Project; the accuracy of reserve and
resource, grade, mine life, cash cost, net present value and
internal rate of return estimates and other assumptions,
projections and estimates made in the technical reports for the San
Francisco Property, Florida Canyon Property and the Ana Paula
Project; that mineral resources can be developed as planned;
interest and exchange rates; that required financing and permits
will be obtained; general economic conditions; that labour
disputes, flooding, ground instability, fire, failure of plant,
equipment or processes to operate are as anticipated and other
risks of the mining industry will not be encountered; that
contracted parties provide goods or services in a timely manner;
that there is no material adverse change in the price of gold,
silver or other metals; competitive conditions in the mining
industry; title to mineral properties costs; and changes in laws,
rules and regulations applicable to the Company. Forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors which may cause actual results, performance or
achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from those
anticipated in such forward-looking statements. The Company
believes the expectations reflected in such forward-looking
statements are reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these
expectations will prove to be correct and you are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained
herein.
Some of the risks and other factors which could
cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in
the forward-looking statements contained in this news release
include, but are not limited to: the failure of the Company to
successfully implement its operational and exploration strategies
and mine plans as currently anticipated, or the failure of these
plans and strategies to have the desired results on the Company and
its mineral projects; continued or sustained decreases in the price
of gold; competition with other companies with greater financial
and human resources and technical facilities; risks associated with
doing business in Mexico; maintaining compliance with governmental
regulations and expenses associated with such compliance; ability
to hire, train, deploy and manage qualified personnel in a timely
manner; ability to obtain or renew required government permits;
failure to discover new reserves, maintain or enhance existing
reserves or develop new operations; risks and hazards associated
with exploration and mining operations; accessibility and
reliability of existing local infrastructure and availability of
adequate infrastructures in the future; environmental regulation;
land reclamation requirements; ownership of, or control over, the
properties on which the Company operates; maintaining existing
property rights or obtaining new rights; inherent uncertainties in
the process of estimating mineral reserves and resources; reported
reserves and resources may not accurately reflect the economic
viability of the Company’s properties; uncertainties in estimating
future mine production and related costs; risks associated with
expansion and development of mining properties; currency exchange
rate fluctuations; directors’ and officers’ conflicts of interest;
inability to access additional capital; problems integrating new
acquisitions and other problems with strategic transactions; legal
proceedings; uncertainties related to the repatriation of funds
from foreign subsidiaries; no dividend payments; volatile share
price; negative research reports or analyst’s downgrades and
dilution; and other factors contained in the section entitled “Risk
Factors” in the Company’s AIF.
Although the Company has attempted to identify
important factors that could cause actual results or events to
differ materially from those described in the forward-looking
statements, you are cautioned that this list is not exhaustive and
there may be other factors that the Company has not identified.
Furthermore, the Company undertakes no obligation to update or
revise any forward-looking statements included in this news release
if these beliefs, estimates and opinions or other circumstances
should change, except as otherwise required by applicable law.
Source: ALO
For further information, please
contact:Lynette GouldVice President, Investor
Relations604-638-8976lynette.gould@aliogold.com
Neither the TSX nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX) nor
the New York Stock Exchange MKT accepts responsibility for the
adequacy or accuracy of this news release.
Alio Gold (AMEX:ALO)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Dez 2024 até Jan 2025
Alio Gold (AMEX:ALO)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jan 2024 até Jan 2025