Alio Gold Inc. (TSX, NYSE AMERICAN: ALO) (“Alio
Gold” or the “Company”), is pleased to report the results of an
updated Life of Mine Plan for it’s 100% owned Florida Canyon Mine
in Pershing County Nevada, USA. An associated NI 43-101
compliant technical report is being prepared by SRK Consulting and
will be filed on SEDAR no later than March 1, 2019.
Florida Canyon Life of Mine Plan
Highlights
- After-tax NPV5% of $105 million based on a $1,300 per ounce
gold price
- Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves of 1.01 million ounces
gold (85.9 million tonnes at 0.37 g/t gold) based on a pit designed
to maximize project economics at $1,250/oz gold price
- Near-term production growth: 47,4001 ounces produced in 2018
expected to increase to 62,200 ounces in 2019, and to an average of
75,000 ounces per year for the next 8 years
- Life of mine (“LOM”) gold production of 734,000 ounces with a
9.8 year mine life
- LOM free cash flow of $138 million, after tax, at $1,300/oz
gold
- Capital expenditures of $81.9 million expected over the LOM,
including replacement of mining fleet
- LOM cash costs of $903 per ounce of gold and all-in sustaining
costs of $1,058 per ounce of gold
- LOM gold recovery of 71%
- Potential for further production growth with the restart of the
Standard Mine, a past producing mine adjacent to Florida
Canyon
- Further strategic value to be studied in the sulphide deposit
underlying the oxide reserves
"This positive Life of Mine Plan confirms the
value of Florida Canyon that we saw when we acquired the mine last
year," said Greg McCunn, Chief Executive Officer. "The mine
produced 47,400 ounces of gold in 2018 and the ramp up progressed
well over the fourth quarter. In 2019, we expect Florida
Canyon to produce approximately 60,000 ounces of gold at a cash
cost of approximately $1,000/oz. We expect to spend
approximately $10 million in capital in 2019, including an
expansion to the leach pad and key infrastructure around the
crushing circuit to eliminate re-handling of the ore ahead of the
crusher, which we expect will reduce operating costs.
"We anticipate needing to begin replacing our
mining fleet in 2020. This Life of Mine Plan assumes we will
replace the existing CAT 785 fleet over a period of time with new
equipment. In 2019 we will be evaluating alternative options
to reduce the sustaining capital requirements as well as
potentially reducing the truck size to CAT 777’s to allow narrower
ramps in the pits.
"Additionally, we believe that there are a
number of opportunities to enhance the value of Florida Canyon that
we will evaluate in 2019 including the restart of the adjacent
Standard Mine and the strategic value of the sulphide deposit
underlying the oxide reserves."
Florida Canyon Overview
The Florida Canyon mine is located halfway
between Lovelock and Winnemucca in the state of Nevada. The mine
sits immediately adjacent to Interstate 80 and is located
approximately 210 kilometres northeast of Reno, Nevada. The Mine
operated between 1986 through 2004; and 2007 to 2011, recovering
over 2.3 million ounces of gold. The Standard Mine operated
between 2004 and 2007, and again between 2011 through the second
quarter of 2015. The Florida Canyon mine was re-started in 2017
with commercial production declared in December 2017. Alio
Gold holds a 100% interest in the Florida Canyon Mine through its
wholly-owned subsidiary Alio Gold US Inc.
Mineral Resource Estimate
The LOM Plan was developed based on the Measured
and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate prepared by SRK Consulting
dated July 31, 2018 (filed on SEDAR on November 30, 2018, see news
release dated October 18, 2018).
|
|
|
|
Florida Canyon: Oxide Resources (Inclusive of
Mineral Reserves)July 31, 2018 $1,350/oz
gold |
|
|
|
|
|
Measured |
Indicated |
Measured & Indicated |
|
Metric
Tonnes(000’s) |
Au
g/t |
Contained
AuOunces (000’s) |
Metric
Tonnes(000’s) |
Aug/t |
Contained
AuOunces (000’s) |
Metric
Tonnes(000’s) |
Aug/t |
Contained
AuOunces (000’s) |
Central Pit |
46,448 |
0.40 |
597 |
9,758 |
0.37 |
115 |
56,206 |
0.39 |
712 |
Main Pit |
27,983 |
0.37 |
331 |
9,100 |
0.34 |
100 |
37,083 |
0.36 |
431 |
Jasperoid Hill |
5,393 |
0.39 |
68 |
2,046 |
0.32 |
21 |
7,439 |
0.37 |
89 |
Radio Towers |
25,243 |
0.46 |
375 |
6,904 |
0.47 |
103 |
32,147 |
0.46 |
478 |
TOTAL |
105,068 |
0.41 |
1,371 |
27,807 |
0.38 |
339 |
132,875 |
0.40 |
1,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* See
Notes on Mineral Resources at end of this news release. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral Reserve Estimate
A Mineral Reserve Estimate was produced using a
combination of the ultimate pit design, cut-off grade, and
production schedule. The cut-off grade determines whether
material is processed as ore or disposed of as waste. The grade is
the gold fire assay grade of the material and the cut-off is the
value at which the revenue of the ore is more than the cost of
processing, general and administrative costs and associated
sustaining capital costs, less the differential haulage cost
between ore and waste. The cut-off grade used for Central, Central
North, Jasperoid Hill and Main mining areas was 0.17 g/t, while
Radio Towers cut-off was 0.21 g/t.
|
|
|
|
Florida Canyon: Oxide
Reserves November 1, 2018 $1,250/oz
gold |
|
|
|
|
|
Proven |
Probable |
Proven & Probable |
|
Metric
Tonnes(000’s) |
Au
g/t |
Contained
AuOunces (000’s) |
Metric
Tonnes(000’s) |
Aug/t |
Contained
AuOunces (000’s) |
Metric
Tonnes(000’s) |
Aug/t |
Contained
AuOunces (000’s) |
Central |
28,293 |
0.36 |
331 |
2,605 |
0.32 |
27 |
30,899 |
0.36 |
358 |
Central North |
5,725 |
0.37 |
68 |
2,018 |
0.37 |
24 |
7,744 |
0.37 |
92 |
Main |
20,496 |
0.33 |
217 |
4,932 |
0.31 |
49 |
25,428 |
0.33 |
267 |
Jasperoid Hill |
2,000 |
0.39 |
25 |
830 |
0.30 |
8 |
2,831 |
0.37 |
34 |
Radio Towers |
16,731 |
0.44 |
235 |
2,219 |
0.39 |
28 |
18,950 |
0.43 |
263 |
TOTAL |
73,246 |
0.38 |
876 |
12,605 |
0.34 |
136 |
85,852 |
0.37 |
1,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*See Notes
on Mineral Reserves at the end of this release. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining and Processing
Florida Canyon uses a standard open pit mining
method with conventional drilling and blasting to liberate ore and
waste. Ore is sourced from five primary areas: Main, Central,
Central North, Jasperoid Hill and Radio Towers. Waste is
hauled to three waste dump locations to minimize haulage
distances. The LOM strip ratio is estimated to be 1.03 tonnes
of waste per tonne of ore.
Ore is currently dumped onto a run-of-mine
stockpile where a front-end loader trams ore into a two stage, open
circuit crushing circuit. Ore is crushed to a P80 of
approximately 1.5 inches and agglomerated before being re-loaded
into haul trucks and stacked on conventional heap leach pads where
it is irrigated with cyanide solution. Gold is recovered from
solution in the form of doré via a conventional carbon-in-column
adsorption, stripping and electrowinning circuit. The doré is
transported off-site for further refining into gold and silver
metal. Gold recovery is estimated to be 71% based on
metallurgical testing as well as current and past operating
results.
In 2019, planned capital expenditures will be
employed to expand the existing leach pad as well as construct a
dump-pocket ahead of the primary crushing circuit. The
dump-pocket will eliminate the need for re-handling of ore ahead of
the crushing circuit, allowing haul trucks to direct dump ore.
Scheduling of Mineral Reserves was based on the
limitation of processing, approximately 8.7 million tonnes per
annum of ore through the crushing circuit. The LOM Plan is
summarized in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
Ore
Mined(Mt) |
Waste
Mined(Mt) |
Strip
Ratio(waste:ore) |
Gold
Grade(g/t) |
Gold
Produced(ounces) |
2019 |
8.62 |
4.01 |
0.47 |
0.34 |
62.2 |
2020 |
8.71 |
8.46 |
0.97 |
0.34 |
67.4 |
2021 |
8.71 |
10.71 |
1.23 |
0.37 |
73.3 |
2022 |
8.71 |
10.94 |
1.26 |
0.36 |
72.1 |
2023 |
8.71 |
8.70 |
1.00 |
0.40 |
79.3 |
2024 |
8.71 |
6.28 |
0.72 |
0.42 |
82.6 |
2025 |
8.71 |
12.42 |
1.43 |
0.35 |
68.6 |
2026 |
8.71 |
14.32 |
1.64 |
0.43 |
85.5 |
2027 |
8.71 |
8.27 |
0.95 |
0.36 |
70.8 |
2028 |
6.67 |
3.51 |
0.53 |
0.32 |
48.3 |
2029 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
24.1 |
Total |
84.96 |
87.62 |
1.03 |
0.37 |
734.2 |
Figures may not total due to rounding, totals
not exactly equal to Mineral Reserves as November and December 2018
production excluded from above (Footnote 2)
Operating Costs
Operating costs were estimated for the LOM Plan based partially
on first principles and partially on actual operating data from the
mine site. Unit costs were estimated as follows.
|
|
|
Operating Costs |
Units |
Value |
Mining |
$/t mined |
$1.93 |
Processing |
$/t processed |
$3.23 |
General & Administrative |
$M/annum |
$5.3 |
Mining costs were developed based on the
existing owner mining unit operations and estimated truck haulage
schedules and distances. As the existing truck fleet is
expected to be replaced, maintenance costs were based on first
principals for new equipment. Processing costs were estimated
based on current operations, with adjustments to the operating cost
following capital improvements to eliminate re-handling of ore
ahead of the crusher. Key cost drivers in the cash costs
are:
- Diesel Fuel Price $0.658/litre and 0.398 litres/tonne mined
consumption
- Explosives $0.562/kg and 0.185kg/tonne mined (blended ANFO and
heavy ANFO cost)
- Cyanide Cost $2.59/kg and 0.24 kg/tonne consumption
- Lime Cost $0.29/kg and 1.05 kg/tonne consumption
Unit costs were applied to the mine plan,
resulting in expected LOM cash cost expenditures of $663 million,
or $903/oz of gold produced.
In addition to cash costs, $3.48 per ounce of
gold has been allowed for charges from the refinery to refine doré
into saleable gold. This cost is based on the current
precious metals refining contract. In addition, Florida
Canyon production is subject to two royalties payable to third
parties based on gold revenues: a 2.5% Net Smelter Return
royalty and a 3.5% royalty based on Net Smelter Return less
allowable deductions. The two royalties equate to 4.6% of net
revenues at $1,300/oz gold price, or $60/oz.
Cash Costs and AISC per Gold Sold
($/oz)
|
|
|
|
Life-of-Mine($M) |
$/oz |
Mining |
332 |
453 |
Processing |
274 |
374 |
General & administrative |
56 |
76 |
Total cash costs |
662 |
903 |
Refining Charges |
3 |
4 |
Royalties (at $1,300/oz gold) |
44 |
60 |
Sustaining capital |
68 |
92 |
All-in Sustaining Costs |
777 |
1,058 |
|
|
|
* Figures
may not total due to rounding |
|
|
|
Capital costs for the LOM are anticipated to be
primarily for the replacement of the current mining equipment,
construction of additional leach pad capacity, upgrading process
equipment and improving crusher production and efficiency.
LOM capital was estimated at $81.9 million. A portion of these
costs are required to sustain operations ($67.7 million), while a
portion are targeted at reducing operating costs and improving
reliability ($5.5 million). A contingency was added to the
capital cost estimates where appropriate, totalling $8.7
million.
|
|
Capital Costs Estimates |
Life-of-Mine($M) |
Sustaining Capital |
67.7 |
Other Capital |
5.5 |
Contingency |
8.7 |
Total Capital Costs |
81.9 |
|
|
Sustaining capital is anticipated to be
predominantly for the replacement of the existing mining fleet
which is expected to start in 2020 and construction of four
expansions to the existing heap leach pad. Total anticipated
sustaining capital of $67.7 million over the LOM equates to $92/oz
of gold produced. Expected All-in-Sustaining Costs (“AISC”)
for the LOM are $777 million, or $1,058/oz of gold produced.
Cash Flow Estimates
Annual cash flows were estimated for the LOM
based on revenues projected at a long-term gold price of $1,300/oz
and totalled $954 million LOM. Historically, Florida Canyon
has produced approximately 0.88 ounces of silver for every ounce of
gold. Silver has not been modeled in the Mineral Reserve
Estimate and as such, no credit has been taken in this study for
silver revenue. In 2018, Florida Canyon generated
approximately $0.5 million in revenue from silver.
Expected AISC totalling $777 million as
described above were deducted from the revenues. In addition,
closure cost net of future bond releases was estimated based on
forecast disturbances at the end of the mine life totalling $16.8
million.
Estimates for taxes payable include the Nevada
Net Proceeds tax of 5% of taxable income, US Federal tax at 21% of
taxable income, property taxes and Nevada State Mining tax.
Free cash flow is defined as revenues less AISC,
non-sustaining capital, taxes and closure costs and totals an
expected $138 million LOM. Discounting these cashflows using
a 5% discount rate results in a net present value of $105 million
for the LOM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ Million) |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
2026 |
2027 |
2028 |
2029 |
2030 |
2031 |
2032 |
Total |
Revenue |
80.9 |
87.6 |
95.3 |
93.8 |
103.1 |
107.4 |
89.2 |
111.1 |
92.1 |
62.7 |
31.3 |
|
|
|
954.4 |
Mining |
27.3 |
33.6 |
36.2 |
36.3 |
34.3 |
32.3 |
37.5 |
44.6 |
31.3 |
18.9 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
332.5 |
Processing |
27.1 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
21.0 |
7.5 |
|
|
|
274.4 |
G&A |
5.3 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
2.7 |
|
|
|
56.0 |
Total Cash Costs |
59.8 |
66.3 |
68.9 |
69.0 |
67.0 |
65.0 |
70.2 |
77.3 |
64.0 |
45.2 |
10.2 |
|
|
|
662.9 |
Refining Charges |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
Royalties |
3.7 |
4.0 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
4.7 |
4.9 |
4.1 |
5.1 |
4.2 |
2.9 |
1.4 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
Sustaining Capital |
5.7 |
12.6 |
14.2 |
15.1 |
7.0 |
6.9 |
3.6 |
2.0 |
0.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
67.7 |
Total AISC |
69.4 |
83.1 |
87.7 |
88.7 |
79.1 |
77.1 |
78.1 |
84.8 |
69.1 |
48.3 |
11.7 |
|
|
|
777.1 |
Other Capital |
4.6 |
4.4 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
Tax |
1.6 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
8.7 |
Closure Costs |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.7 |
3.4 |
3.4 |
8.4 |
16.8 |
Free Cash Flow |
5.3 |
-1.1 |
4.6 |
2.7 |
22.7 |
28.4 |
10.4 |
25.8 |
22.6 |
14.1 |
17.7 |
-3.5 |
-3.5 |
-8.6 |
137.6 |
Discount Factor (5%) |
1.000 |
0.952 |
0.907 |
0.864 |
0.823 |
0.784 |
0.746 |
0.711 |
0.677 |
0.645 |
0.614 |
0.585 |
0.557 |
0.530 |
|
Net Present Value |
5.3 |
-1.0 |
4.2 |
2.4 |
18.7 |
22.2 |
7.8 |
18.4 |
15.3 |
9.1 |
10.9 |
-2.1 |
-2.0 |
-4.5 |
104.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Sensitivity to Gold
Prices
The net present value and LOM expected free cash
flow is sensitive to the long-term price of gold, as follows.
|
|
|
Gold Price |
NPV (5%) |
LOM Cashflow |
$/oz |
$ M |
$M |
1,200 |
51 |
71 |
1,250 |
78 |
105 |
1,300 |
105 |
138 |
1,350 |
131 |
170 |
1,400 |
156 |
202 |
1,450 |
181 |
233 |
1,500 |
205 |
263 |
|
|
|
Opportunities
A number of opportunities were outlined in the
LOM plan that could enhance operating efficiency and reduce
operating costs at the Florida Canyon Mine. In addition, the
Company expects to begin work in 2019 on two important
opportunities to enhance value.
Standard Mine
The Standard Mine is located approximately 4 km
south and immediately adjacent to Florida Canyon Mine. This
LOM Plan does not consider the Standard Mine in its Mineral
Resource, Reserve or production estimates. The open-pit
heap-leach mine operated between 2004 and 2007 as a run-of-mine
heap leach and then more recently from 2011 to 2015 with ore
crushing to a P80 of approximately 1.5 inches. Over this
period, the mine produced approximately 500,000 ounces of gold from
ore grading 0.62 g/t gold. In 2018, the Florida Canyon
operations continued to circulate non-cyanide bearing solution
through the Standard heap leach pad, trucking carbon to the Florida
Canyon refinery occasionally for stripping. Gold production
from Standard was approximately 1,000 ounces in 2018.
In 2019, the Company expects to complete
geological mapping focused on the current plan of operations
boundary in known satellite deposits. A non-43-101 compliant,
historical mineral resource estimate will be investigated with the
intent of bringing it up to current mineral resource standards
including building a geological model and updating the historic
resource models.
Sulphides Underlying the Existing Florida Canyon
Mineral Resource Area
Historical and more recent drilling in 2017 have
shown a significant amount of sulphide mineralization underlying
the oxide mineralization in the current Florida Canyon Mineral
Resource. In the historical drilling a total of 262 drill
holes (241 reverse circulation and 21 core) touched or penetrated
the sulfide body and yielded an average grade of 2.36 g/t gold in
the sulfide zone with gold values as high as 100 g/t in a northeast
oriented structural zone.
More recently, Rye Patch Gold completed scouting
drilling of the sulphide zone (see news release filed on its SEDAR
profile at www.sedar.com dated November 29, 2017). The
reverse circulation drill program was designed to test the
distribution of the sulphide body and validated the current
geologic model and ore controls. The three gold zones identified in
drill hole FCR-17-015 consist of 35.1 metres grading 2.08 g/t gold
starting at 88.4 metres, 57.9 metres grading 1.30 g/t gold starting
129.5 metres, and 15.2 metres grading 1.08 g/t gold starting at
236.2 metres. The grades reported are non-continuous in the
specified intervals, using a 1.0 g/t gold cut off. The drill
hole was located in an untested sulfide area between the Central
and Main pits. The intersections confirm the notion that the
mineralization has a similar structural geometry to the oxide zone
thus connecting the two zones. The multiple intercepts demonstrate
a substantial thickness and breadth of the sulphide zone.
Drill hole FCR-17-016 identified two gold zones
including 70.1 metres grading 2.94 g/t gold starting at 79.2 metres
and 56.4 metres grading 2.60 g/t gold starting at 164.6 metres,
also non-continuous using a 1.0 g/t gold cut off. The drill hole
was located along the northern portion of the sulfide body where
existing assay information suggested lower grade in the sulfide
zone. The drill hole shows the historic data will need more off-set
and twin drill holes to confirm grade distribution and tenor.
In 2019, the Company expects to evaluate
potential strategic partnerships to jointly investigate the
potential for producing a gold-bearing sulphide concentrate
suitable for treatment at other Nevada gold production
facilities.
Footnotes:
- Approximate 2018 gold production subject to finalization and
refinery adjustments
- Mineral Reserves were estimated based on surveyed pit surfaces
at November 1, 2019. The production schedule excludes actual
production from November 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. In
addition, gold production in the final years of operation include
recovery of gold in inventory in the heap leach pads as at November
1, 2018. As such, Mineral Reserves are not equal to scheduled
gold production LOM.
Notes on Mineral
Resources
- Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have
demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that any
part of the Mineral Resources estimated will be converted into a
Mineral Reserves estimate;
- Au recovery is based on a non-linear relationship to Au Fire
Assay grade and is evaluated on a block by block basis in the
resource model. To account for this variability, an NSR value
was calculated for each block and cutoffs were then applied to the
NSR;
- The resource model was constructed in US units, and quantities
and grades in the above table reflect conversion to metric units
for reporting where applicable. NSR cut-offs and costs in the notes
below are expressed in US$/short ton (ston);
- Resources are reported using a NSR cutoff grade of US$3.99/ston
for the Central area, US$4.09/ston for the Central N. and Jasperoid
Hill areas, US$3.94/ston for the Main and Radio Towers areas,
US$4.04/ston for the Radio Towers N. area, and US$3.99/ston for the
Radio Towers2 area. The variable NSR cutoffs reflect differences in
haulage cost;
- Resources in the table above are grouped by major mining
area. Central and Central N. were combined, as were all Radio
Towers mining areas.;
- Resources stated as contained within a potentially economically
minable open pit; pit optimization parameters are: US$1,350/toz Au,
an average Au Recovery of 61% for Radio Towers area and 67% for the
Central/Main area , US$2.80/toz Au Sales Cost, US$1.26/ston base
waste mining cost, variable haulage costs by mining area,
US$3.99/ston base mineralized material processing cost, 45°
pit slopes for in-situ rock, and a 37° pit slope for fill/dumps;
and
- Numbers in the table have been rounded to reflect the accuracy
of the estimate and may not sum due to rounding.
Notes on Mineral Reserves
- Mineral Reserves have an effective date of 1 November 2018. The
Qualified Person for the estimate is Mr. Justin Smith, P.E.,
SME-RM.
- The Mineral Reserves and Resources in this report were
estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and
Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves,
Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee
on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM Council.
- The reserve was developed using US units, and quantities and
grades in the above table reflect conversion to metric units for
reporting where applicable. Cut-offs and costs in the notes below
are expressed in ounces per short ton (oz/ston) and US$/short ton
($/ston);
- Reserves are reported within a designed pit using a cutoff of
0.006 oz/ston for the radio towers mining area and 0.005 oz/ston
for all other areas.
- The mineral reserves are based on a pit design which in turn
aligns with an ultimate pit shell selected from a Lerchs-Grossmann
pit optimization exercise. Key inputs for the reserve cutoff
calculation are:
- A metal price of $1,250/oz Au;
- Ore mining costs by area ranging from $1.42/ston to
$2.67/ston;
- Waste mining costs by area ranging from $1.24/ston to
$1.83/ston;
- Crushing and processing costs of $2.85/ston ore;
- General and administration costs of $1.02/ston milled;
- Pit slope angles varying from 32.5 to 45 degrees; and
- Process recoveries of 70%.
- Mining dilution is assumed to be 5% at zero grade;
- Ore loss is assumed to be 5%;
- The ultimate pit includes 88.8 million tonnes of waste for a
stripping ratio of 1.03 tonnes of waste per tonne of ore; and
- All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Qualified Persons
The resource estimate and related geologic
modeling were conducted by, or under the supervision of Tim Carew,
M.Sc. P.Geo. of SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc., Reno, Nevada. The mine
planning and related reserve estimate were conducted by, or under
the supervision of Justin Smith, P.E., SME-RM. of SRK Consulting
(U.S.), Inc., Reno, Nevada. The Capital Cost Estimates were
conducted by Kent Hartley, P.E. of SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc.,
Reno, Nevada with the exception of the 2019 capital cost budget,
which was completed by the Florida Canyon Mine site staff and
approved by the Alio Gold board of directors. The Operating
Cost Estimates and financial analysis were conducted by, or under
the supervision of Tom Bagan, P.E., MBA, SME-RM, of Thomas H.
Bagan, LLC., Sparks, Nevada. The metallurgical processing and
recovery estimates were conducted by, or under the supervision of
Jeffrey Woods, SME MMSA QP of Woods Process Services, Denver
Colorado.
Messer’s Carew, Smith, Hartley, Bagan and Woods
are Qualified Persons independent of Alio Gold for the purposes of
NI 43-101 and have reviewed and approved the technical content
contained herein.
Technical Report
A National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of
Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) Technical Report that
summarizes the results of the LOM Plan and incorporates the initial
mineral reserve statement for Florida Canyon will be filed within
45 days on SEDAR and on the Company’s website (the “Technical
Report”). For readers to fully understand the information in
this news release, they should read the Technical Report in its
entirety, including all qualifications, assumptions and exclusions
that relate to the LOM Plan. The Technical Report is intended to be
read as a whole, and sections should not be read or relied upon out
of context.
About Alio
Gold
Alio Gold is a growth-oriented gold mining
company, focused on exploration, development and production in
Mexico and the USA. Its principal assets include its
100%-owned and operating San Francisco Mine in Sonora, Mexico, its
100%-owned and operating Florida Canyon Mine in Nevada, USA and its
100%-owned development stage Ana Paula Project in Guerrero, Mexico.
The Company also has a portfolio of other exploration properties
located in Mexico and the USA.
Cautionary Note to United States
Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated and Inferred
Resources
The terms "mineral resource", "measured mineral
resource", "indicated mineral resource", "inferred mineral
resource" used herein are Canadian mining terms used in accordance
with NI 43-101 under the guidelines set out in the Canadian
Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and Petroleum (the "CIM")
Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the
CIM Council, as may be amended from time to time. These definitions
differ from the definitions in the United States Securities &
Exchange Commission ("SEC") Industry Guide 7. In the United States,
a mineral reserve is defined as a part of a mineral deposit which
could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time
the mineral reserve determination is made.
While the terms "mineral resource", "measured
mineral resource," "indicated mineral resource", and "inferred
mineral resource" are recognized and required by Canadian
regulations, they are not defined terms under standards in the
United States and normally are not permitted to be used in reports
and registration statements filed with the SEC. As such,
information contained herein concerning descriptions of
mineralization and resources under Canadian standards may not be
comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies in
SEC filings.
Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves
do not have demonstrated economic viability. With respect to
"indicated mineral resource" and "inferred mineral resource", there
is a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and a great
uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot
be assumed that all or any part of a "measured mineral resource",
"indicated mineral resource" or "inferred mineral resource" will
ever be upgraded to a higher category.
Accordingly, information herein containing
descriptions of our mineral deposits may not be comparable to
similar information made public by US companies subject to the
reporting and disclosure requirements under US federal securities
laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.
Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements and information contained in
this news release constitute “forward-looking statements” within
the meaning of applicable U.S. securities laws and “forward-looking
information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities
laws, which we refer to collectively as “forward-looking
statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements and
information regarding possible events, conditions or results of
operations that are based upon assumptions about future economic
conditions and courses of action. All statements and information
other than statements of historical fact may be forward-looking
statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of words such as “seek”, “expect”,
“anticipate”, “budget”, “plan”, “estimate”, “continue”, “forecast”,
“intend”, “believe”, “predict”, “potential”, “target”, “may”,
“could”, “would”, “might”, “will” and similar words or phrases
(including negative variations) suggesting future outcomes or
statements regarding an outlook.
Forward-looking statements in news release
include, but are not limited to, statements which relate to future
events. Such statements include estimates of future gold prices,
current and future gold production at the Florida Canyon Mine, the
LOM of the Florida Canyon Mine, revenue and cash flows generated by
the operation of the Florida Canyon Mine, operating, capital, cash,
closure and all in sustaining costs associated with the Florida
Canyon Mine, gold grades and recovery at the Florida Canyon Mine,
mining rates, strip ratios at the Florida Canyon Mine and future
taxes payable by the Company and its subsidiaries; the Florida
Canyon Mine mineral resource and reserve estimates; and estimates,
forecasts and statements with respect to mine plans and designs,
including with respect to the replacement of the Florida Canyon
mining fleet, the expansion to the leach pad and key infrastructure
around the crushing circuit at the Florida Canyon Mine and the
benefits expected to be derived therefrom, the restart of the
Standard Mine and potential future production growth resulting
therefrom, plans with respect to the sulphide deposit at the
Florida Canyon Mine and the benefits expected to be derived
therefrom and planned activities to improve reliability and
operating efficiency and reduce operating and sustaining capital
cost requirements at the Florida Canyon Mine.
Such forward-looking statements are based on a
number of material factors and assumptions, including, but not
limited to: the successful completion of development projects,
planned expansions or other projects within the timelines
anticipated and at anticipated production levels; the accuracy of
gold price, production, revenue, capital expenditure, cost, reserve
and resource, grade, mining, strip ratio, recovery, mine life, net
present value, and tax estimates and other assumptions, projections
and estimates made in respect of the Florida Canyon Mine; that
mineral resources can be developed as planned; interest and
exchange rates; that required financing and permits will be
obtained; general economic conditions, that labour disputes,
flooding, ground instability, fire, failure of plant, equipment or
processes to operate are as anticipated and other risks of the
mining industry will not be encountered; that contracted parties
provide goods or services in a timely manner; that there is no
material adverse change in the price of gold, silver or other
metals; competitive conditions in the mining industry; title to
mineral properties costs; and changes in laws, rules and
regulations applicable to the Company. Forward- looking statements
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
which may cause actual results, performance or achievements, or
industry results, to differ materially from those anticipated in
such forward-looking statements. The Company believes the
expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are
reasonable, but no assurance can be given that these expectations
will prove to be correct and you are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on forward-looking statements contained herein.
Some of the risks and other factors which could
cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in
the forward-looking statements contained in this news release
herein by reference include, but are not limited to: decreases in
the price of gold; competition with other companies with greater
financial and human resources and technical facilities; maintaining
compliance with governmental regulations and expenses associated
with such compliance; ability to hire, train, deploy and manage
qualified personnel in a timely manner; ability to obtain or renew
required government permits; failure to discover new reserves,
maintain or enhance existing reserves or develop new operations;
risks and hazards associated with exploration and mining
operations; accessibility and reliability of existing local
infrastructure and availability of adequate infrastructures in the
future; environmental regulation; land reclamation requirements;
ownership of, or control over, the properties on which the Company
operates; maintaining existing property rights or obtaining new
rights; inherent uncertainties in the process of estimating mineral
reserves and resources; reported reserves and resources may not
accurately reflect the economic viability of the Company’s
properties; uncertainties in estimating future mine production and
related costs; risks associated with expansion and development of
mining properties; currency exchange rate fluctuations; directors’
and officers’ conflicts of interest; inability to access additional
capital; problems integrating new acquisitions and other problems
with strategic transactions; legal proceedings; uncertainties
related to the repatriation of funds from foreign subsidiaries; no
dividend payments; volatile share price; negative research reports
or analyst’s downgrades and dilution; and other factors contained
in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s annual
information form dated March 14, 2018 and filed on the Company’s
SEDAR profile.
Although the Company has attempted to identify
important factors that could cause actual results or events to
differ materially from those described in the forward-looking
statements, you are cautioned that this list is not exhaustive and
there may be other factors that the Company has not identified.
Furthermore, the Company undertakes no obligation to update or
revise any forward-looking statements included in, or incorporated
by reference in, this news release if these beliefs, estimates and
opinions or other circumstances should change, except as otherwise
required by applicable law.
For further information, please
contact:Lynette GouldVice President, Investor
Relations604-638-8976lynette.gould@aliogold.com
Source: ALO
Neither the TSX nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX) nor
the New York Stock Exchange MKT accepts responsibility for the
adequacy or accuracy of this news release.
Alio Gold (AMEX:ALO)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jan 2025 até Fev 2025
Alio Gold (AMEX:ALO)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Fev 2024 até Fev 2025