Serengeti Resources Inc. (SIR:
TSX-V) ("Serengeti" or "the Company") is pleased to
report results from a recently completed historical data
compilation and modelling exercise completed for the Top Cat
property, which is under option from the Pinchi Group [see
Serengeti press release dated July 23, 2019] (the “Top Cat
Option”). Top Cat covers approximately 240 sq. km. in north-central
BC. The property adjoins the western margin of Sun Metals' and
Teck's Lorraine claim groups, approximately 10km north of the
Lorraine copper-gold deposit. Upon completion of the 2019 field
mapping and sampling program at Top Cat (see Serengeti press
release dated November 5, 2019), Serengeti completed a detailed
historical data compilation which resulted in the accumulation of
632 rock, and 4,547 soil samples; 69 drillhole logs and related
assays from Cat Mountain; and various geophysical surveys dating
back to 1974. Serengeti also completed platinum group element
(“PGE”) analysis on a sample from Nova, and petrographic analysis
on samples from Nova and Cat Mountain. The Nova sample returned
elevated palladium values clearly correlated with copper.
Cat Mountain DDH Compilation, 3D
Modelling and Targeting
Cat Mountain has seen over 10,000 metres of
drilling in 69 drill holes completed between 1977 and 2007. Most
holes are located within the Bet (western) and Hoffman (eastern)
zones which are characterized by quartz-magnetite ± chalcopyrite-Au
veins and as copper replacements in volcanic rocks. Highlights from
historical drilling are included in Table 1, below. The Bet and
Hoffman zones occur within a strong magnetic high anomaly along the
eastern contact of the Hogem Batholith with volcanics of the
Quesnel Terrane. Northeast and northwest-striking faults crosscut
and transpose mineralized zones, which is supported by soil
geochemical data.
Table
1: Highlights from compiled historical Cat
Mountain DDH results ¹
Hole ID |
From (m) |
To (m) |
Interval (m) ² |
Au g/t ³ |
Cu % |
Zone |
Comments |
CAT-89-01 |
7.0 |
91.9 |
84.9 |
0.38 |
0.11 |
Bet Zone |
K-feldspar altered augite phyric volcanics |
including |
15.1 |
66.1 |
51 |
0.60 |
0.17 |
including |
28.5 |
28.7 |
0.2 |
54.10* |
0.28 |
Oxidized vein breccia |
CAT-89-04 |
6.1 |
52.7 4 |
46.6 |
0.36 |
0.16 |
Bet Zone |
Augite phyric volcanics ; magnetite veins |
CAT-90-01 |
15.0 |
133.0 |
118.0 |
0.51 |
0.10 |
Bet Zone |
Volcanics ; variable intrusive dykes |
including |
96.0 |
97.4 |
1.4 |
63.10* |
0.60 |
Massive magnetite-pyrite vein |
CAT-90-03 |
3.0 |
87.0 |
84.0 |
0.30 |
0.47 |
Bet Zone |
Syenite dominant; volcanics |
including |
3.0 |
29.0 |
26.0 |
0.87 |
0.07 |
and |
35.0 |
77.0 |
42.0 |
0.05 |
0.88 |
CAT-90-04 |
6.0 |
74.0 |
68.0 |
0.21 |
0.03 |
Bet Zone |
Augite phyric and latite volcanics |
CAT-90-08 |
138.0 |
194.0 |
56.0 |
0.41 |
0.03 |
Hoffman Fault |
Latite volcanics; variable intrusive dykes |
including |
160.0 |
170.0 |
10.0 |
1.63 |
0.05 |
CAT-91-16 |
36.0 |
58.0 |
22.0 |
0.03 |
0.30 |
Southeast Cat |
Ash and lapilli tuff volcanics |
CAT-91-26 |
88.0 |
114.0 |
26.0 |
0.26 |
0.02 |
Southeast Cat |
Fault zone in ash and lapilli tuff volcanics |
CAT-94-01 |
3.1 |
98.5 |
95.4 |
1.15 |
0.15 |
Bet Zone |
Sheared/faulted andesite flows |
including |
3.1 |
31.2 |
28.1 |
0.96 |
0.43 |
and |
69.3 |
78.0 |
8.7 |
7.89 |
0.11 |
CAT-94-03 |
76.0 |
78.0 |
2.0 |
62.24* |
0.01 |
Bet Zone |
Andesite flows; variable intrusive dykes |
CAT-94-04 |
3.1 |
61.0 |
57.9 |
1.11 |
0.16 |
Bet Zone |
Andesite flows; variable intrusive dykes |
CAT-04-08 |
3.3 |
68.0 |
64.7 |
0.77 |
0.12 |
Bet Zone |
Witch Lake volcanics; variable intrusive dykes |
and |
90.0 |
136.0 |
46.0 |
0.41 |
0.05 |
and |
182.0 |
256.0 |
74.0 |
0.18 |
0.03 |
CAT-04-09 |
3.0 |
68.0 |
65.0 |
0.43 |
0.16 |
Bet Zone |
K-feldspar altered Witch Lake volcanics |
and |
244.0 |
276.0 |
32.0 |
0.63 |
0.10 |
CAT-05-11 |
10.0 |
16.0 |
6.0 |
0.17 |
1.00 |
Hoffman Zone |
Variably-altered Witch Lake volcanics |
CAT-05-13 |
8.0 |
20.0 |
12.0 |
0.07 |
0.77 |
Hoffman Zone |
CAT-05-14 |
8.0 |
40.0 |
32.0 |
0.04 |
0.28 |
Hoffman Zone |
CAT-05-17 |
24.0 |
70.0 |
46.0 |
0.11 |
0.24 |
Hoffman Zone |
CAT-07-24 |
14.0 |
82.7 |
68.7 |
0.14 |
0.21 |
Hoffman Zone |
Historical Cat Mountain Drilling Results
Notes:
- Results reported above were
compiled by Serengeti Resources from historical analytical
certificates appended to assessment reports filed with the Ministry
of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources.
- Interval lengths do not necessarily
represent true widths of mineralized zones.
- Individual assay results for gold
were capped at 10.0 g/t for compositing purposes.
- EOH: End of hole.
Following the data compilation work, a 3D
geological model was developed with Leapfrog Geo in order to
determine whether known mineralization may be related to a buried
porphyry system. Economic and trace element geochemical data and
regional geophysics were combined with the drilling data to
determine the significance of historical work with respect to
targeting goals. Conclusions resulting from the geological model
include:
- Historical results indicate that a
porphyry system may exist at Cat Mountain based on the association
of Cu and Au in drill holes, presence of multiple intrusive phases,
details of soil geochemistry, and presence of quartz-magnetite ±
chalcopyrite-Au veins;
- The Bet and Hoffman zones are
characterized by moderately to steeply northeast dipping shear
structures (the “Bet Shear” and “Hoffman Shear”, respectively)
which are dominated by quartz-magnetite ± chalcopyrite-Au
veins;
- The Bet Shear is located within a
northwest-trending zone of moderate magnetics which occurs between
two strongly magnetic lobes, the eastern of which is partially
represented by the Hoffman zone;
- The Bet Shear is open along strike
to the northwest, defining a newly recognized target area which has
not been drill tested;
- There is an association between
Au-Cu drill hole intercepts with moderate to low magnetic intensity
and magnetic discontinuities;
- Cu, Mo, W, As and Sb in soils,
which among other elements may be used to vector toward porphyry
systems, define two anomalous zones bisected by the Hoffman Fault
and supports a theory of dextral movement along the Fault which is
substantiated by magnetics;
- Cu-Mo-W in soil anomalism defines a
new target zone (“South Cat”) associated with a dissected magnetic
lobe approximately 900 metres south of the Bet zone near the
contact with the Hogem Batholith. South Cat has never been drilled
and represents a newly recognized target area.
Serengeti is continuing to advance the targeting
model at Cat Mountain through analysis of downhole trace element
data and additional modelling, and is planning to complete a series
of deep-penetrating induced-polarization (“IP”) profiles in 2020 to
assess the validity of conclusions outlined above and define
targets for future drill testing.
Nova PGE Analysis, Petrography and
Targeting
Nova is located in the northern Top Cat property
area and is largely overlain by till locally containing angular
mineralized magnetite-sulphide bearing “skarn” boulders. The
area is characterized by three or more intense magnetic anomalies
measuring up to 500m by 800m each. Historical boulder samples
assay up to 0.52% Cu, 0.327 g/t Au, 4.4 g/t Ag, 0.071 g/t Pt and
0.498 g/t Pd (BCMEMPR Assessment Report 37051).
Platinum-group element (“PGE”) analysis
completed on a magnetite-sulphide “skarn” boulder (“PGE-skarn
sample”) collected by Serengeti proximally west of the central
magnetic anomaly recently returned 1.39% Cu, 0.69 g/t Au,
6.45 g/t Ag, 0.21 g/t Pt and 1.38 g/t Pd.
Petrographic analysis of the PGE-skarn sample
describes a massive skarn dominated by actinolite with lesser
magnetite-(ilmenite) and apatite, with a few skeletal interstitial
grains of hornblende, scattered patches of chalcopyrite and less
abundant bornite altered to covellite. Actinolite is largely
interpreted as an alteration product, and when considered with the
presence of primary and secondary magnetite associated with copper
minerals, suggests magnetic features at Nova may represent the
presence of a Cu-Au-PGE bearing pyroxenite or skarn-hosted
system.
Soil sampling completed in 2019 identified a
strong Cu-Ag anomaly along the fringe of one of the magnetic
anomalies, and an interpreted south-southwestern glacial ice flow
direction supports the hypothesis that mineralized till boulders
may be sourced from “plug”-like magnetic features following the
northwestern trend observed at Nova.
Please click the following link to view updated
map images of Nova and Cat
Mountain: https://serengetiresources.com/projects/top-cat-2/
Qualified person
The field and analytical programs described
herein were supervised by Serengeti Resources staff and the
technical information in this news release has been prepared in
accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements as set out in
National Instrument 43-101, and reviewed by the company's qualified
person, David W. Moore, P.Geo., President and CEO of Serengeti
Resources, who has supervised the preparation of, and approved, the
scientific and technical information in the news release.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
David W. Moore, P.
Geo.President, CEO and Director
About Serengeti Resources
Inc.
Serengeti is a mineral exploration company
managed by an experienced team of professionals with a solid track
record of exploration success. The Company is currently advancing
its majority-owned, advanced Kwanika copper-gold project and
exploring its extensive portfolio of properties in north-central
British Columbia. A number of these other projects are available
for option or joint venture and additional information can be found
on the Company’s website at www.serengetiresources.com.
Quality Assurance/Quality
Control
Sample analysis for the 2019 Top Cat program was
completed at Bureau Veritas Minerals Laboratory in Vancouver, BC,
which is ISO 9001:2015 and 17025 accredited. Copper and silver
analyses were determined by MA250 which is an ultra-trace ICP-MS
method following four-acid digestion and is capable of determining
up to 10,000 ppm Cu and 200,000 ppb Ag; Au was determined by FA430,
a lead collection, Fire Assay/AAS method using a 30-gram sub-sample
and has an upper detection limit of 10 ppm Au. Overlimit Cu
analyses were determined by MA370 which is an ore-grade ICP-ES
method following four-acid digestion and has a lower detection
limit of 0.001% Cu; overlimit Au analyses were determined by FA530,
a lead collection, Fire Assay/gravimetric method using a 30-gram
sub-sample and has a lower detection limit of 0.9 ppm Au. Platinum
and palladium analyses were determined by FA350, a lead collection,
Fire Assay/ICP-ES method using a 50-gram sub-sample with lower
detection limits of 3ppb for Pt, and 2ppb for Pd, and upper
detection limits of 10ppm for Pt and Pd. The field program was
supervised by Serengeti Resources Inc. staff and the technical
information in this news release has been prepared in accordance
with Canadian regulatory requirements as set out in National
Instrument 43-101, and reviewed by the Company’s qualified person,
David W. Moore, P. Geo., President and CEO of Serengeti Resources
Inc. who has supervised the preparation of and approved the
scientific and technical information in this news release.
Cautionary Statement
This document contains “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities
regulations. All statements other than statements of historical
fact herein, including, without limitation, statements regarding
exploration plans and other future plans and objectives, are
forward-looking statements that involve various risks and
uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will
prove to be accurate and future events and actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from our expectations as well as a comprehensive list of
risk factors are disclosed in the Company’s documents filed from
time to time via SEDAR with the Canadian regulatory agencies to
whose policies we are bound. Forward-looking statements are based
on the estimates and opinions of management on the date the
statements are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to
update forward-looking statements should conditions or our
estimates change, other than as required by law and readers are
further advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its
Regulation Services Provider accepts responsibility for the
adequacy or accuracy of this release.
For further information, please
contact:Serengeti Resources Inc. Suite 520 – 800
West Pender St., Vancouver, BC, V6C 2V6 Tel: 604-605-1300 / Email:
info@serengetiresources.com / Website:
www.serengetiresources.com
Serengeti Resources (TSXV:SIR)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Nov 2024 até Dez 2024
Serengeti Resources (TSXV:SIR)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Dez 2023 até Dez 2024