K92 Mining Inc. (“
K92” or
the “
Company”) (TSX:
KNT;
OTCQB:
KNTNF) is pleased to announce results
from the updated resource estimate completed on the Kora and Judd
deposits, at its producing Kainantu Gold Mine in Papua New Guinea.
The resource estimate is based on surface and underground
exploration diamond drilling and underground face sampling. The
focus of exploration at Kora and Judd since the previous resource
estimates (previous effective date of October 31, 2021 for Kora and
December 31, 2021 for Judd) has been predominantly on resource
growth.
Kora and Judd Deposit Mineral Resource
Estimate Highlights
- Kora Measured and Indicated
Resource of 2.3 million ounces at 10.24 g/t gold equivalent
(“AuEq”)(1), representing an +8%
increase from the previous resource estimate of 2.1 million ounces
in October 2021.
- Kora Inferred Resource has
increased substantially to 3.9 million ounces at 8.60 g/t AuEq,
representing a +58% increase from the previous resource estimate of
2.5 million ounces in October 2021. This has resulted primarily
from successful drilling of the southern extensions of the K1 and
K2 lodes.
- Judd Measured and Indicated
Resource of 0.35 million ounces at 8.68 g/t
AuEq(1), representing an increase
of +167% from the previous resource estimate of 0.13 million ounces
in December 2021.
- Judd Inferred Resource of
0.56 million ounces at 7.72 g/t AuEq, representing a +211% increase
from the previous resource estimate of 0.18 million ounces in
December 2021. The increase in the Judd resource has been the
result of a significant amount of drilling since the last resource,
with drill defined strike length extended +130% since the end of
2021.
- Significant component of
the updated Kora and Judd Mineral Resource are high grade (see Fig
3, 4, 7 and 8).
- Excellent reconciliation
between mill feed and the updated resource model with a 1%
difference in gold ounces. Depletion from the previous resource
based on production was approximately 900 kt at 10.4 g/t AuEq (7.9
g/t Au, 0.68% Cu, 12 g/t Ag) or 300 koz AuEq contained
metal(2).
Resource Growth Opportunities and
Exploration Targets
- Significant expansion
potential at both the Kora and Judd vein systems. The Kora vein
system is open along strike and at depth, with exploration focused
on Kora, Kora South and Kora Deeps target areas. The Judd vein
system is open in all directions, with drilling focused on Judd,
Judd South and Judd Deeps target areas. Drilling plans to commence
at Kora South Deeps and Judd South Deeps in 2024 (see Fig 10 and
11).
- In addition to the Kora and
Judd vein systems, there are multiple near-mine high-priority
exploration areas including: Arakompa, Maniape and Karempe.
Drilling at Arakompa is planned to commence in late-2023 / Q1 2024
(see Fig 12).
- Multiple highly prospective
porphyry targets also being explored, with drilling at the A1
Porphyry target underway. The Blue Lake Porphyry deposit which
hosts a 10.8 million ounces AuEq / 4.7 billion pounds inferred
resource (see August 9, 2022 press release) is open at depth and
the Company plans to follow-up with a third, deeper
program.
- Currently up to 11 drill
rigs operating and in October 2023, K92 increased its exploration
budget to a record of US$20 million.
Note (1): Cut-Off of
3 g/t gold equivalent.Note (2): Based on production recorded from
the beginning of Q4 2021 to the end of Q3 2023.
Table 1 – Global Kora and Judd Mineral
Resource (Effective Date September 12, 2023, 3 g/t gold equivalent
cut-off)
|
Tonnes |
Gold |
Silver |
Copper |
AuEq |
|
Mt |
g/t |
moz |
g/t |
moz |
% |
kt |
g/t |
moz |
Kora |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured |
3.7 |
8.74 |
1.0 |
20.5 |
2.5 |
1.21 |
45.0 |
10.96 |
1.3 |
Indicated |
3.1 |
6.99 |
0.7 |
21.9 |
2.2 |
1.31 |
41.3 |
9.40 |
1.0 |
Total M&I |
6.9 |
7.94 |
1.8 |
21.1 |
4.7 |
1.25 |
86.2 |
10.24 |
2.3 |
Inferred |
14.3 |
5.60 |
2.6 |
28.7 |
13.2 |
1.62 |
231.2 |
8.60 |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Judd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured |
0.4 |
9.05 |
0.12 |
19.0 |
0.25 |
0.80 |
3.2 |
10.58 |
0.14 |
Indicated |
0.8 |
6.37 |
0.17 |
15.6 |
0.42 |
0.73 |
6.2 |
7.76 |
0.21 |
Total M&I |
1.2 |
7.24 |
0.29 |
16.7 |
0.67 |
0.75 |
9.4 |
8.68 |
0.35 |
Inferred |
2.3 |
6.27 |
0.45 |
15.8 |
1.15 |
0.76 |
17.2 |
7.72 |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kora and Judd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured |
4.1 |
8.77 |
1.2 |
20.4 |
2.7 |
1.17 |
48.2 |
10.92 |
1.5 |
Indicated |
4.0 |
6.86 |
0.9 |
20.6 |
2.6 |
1.19 |
47.4 |
9.05 |
1.2 |
Total M&I |
8.1 |
7.83 |
2.0 |
20.5 |
5.3 |
1.18 |
95.6 |
10.00 |
2.6 |
Inferred |
16.5 |
5.69 |
3.0 |
27.0 |
14.3 |
1.50 |
248.3 |
8.48 |
4.5 |
- The Independent and Qualified
Person responsible for the Mineral Resource estimate is Simon Tear,
P.Geo. of H & S Consultants Pty. Ltd., Sydney, Australia, and
the effective date of the estimate is September 12, 2023.
- Mineral Resources are not Mineral
Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
- Geological interpretation has
generated a series of narrow, sub-vertical vein structures based on
delineated wireframes on 10m, 20m and 25m spaced cross sections.
The design of the lode wireframes is based on a combination of
logged geology, Au, Cu & Ag assay grades and locally on a
nominal minimum mining width of 5.2m, all coupled with geological
sense.
- Resources were compiled at 3 g/t
gold equivalent cut-off grades for Kora and Judd.
- Density (t/m3) was modelled using
Ordinary Kriging on 2,778 sample measurements. Areas within the
mineral wireframes where no density grades were interpolated had
average default values inserted at appropriate levels.
- Reported tonnage and grade figures
are rounded from raw estimates to reflect the order of accuracy of
the estimate.
- Minor variations may occur during
the addition of rounded numbers.
- Estimations used metric units
(metres, tonnes and g/t).
- Gold equivalents are calculated as AuEq = Au g/t + Cu%*1.6481+
Ag g/t*0.0114. Gold price US$1,700/oz; Silver US$22.5/oz; Copper
US$4.00/lb. Metal payabilities and recoveries are incorporated into
the AuEq formula. Recoveries of 95% for copper and 80% for silver
were used.
John Lewins, K92 Chief Executive Officer and
Director, stated, “The updated Kora and Judd Resource estimate has
significantly exceeded our expectations for both the Measured and
Indicated resource and the Inferred resource. The combined Kora and
Judd Measured and Indicated resource increased +13%, net of
depletion, to 8.1 million tonnes at 10.00 g/t AuEq for 2.6 million
ounces AuEq, and the Inferred resource increased +70%, net of
depletion, to 16.5 million tonnes at 8.48 g/t AuEq for 4.5 million
ounces AuEq. When comparing the updated resource model’s depletion
to mill actuals, Kainantu has delivered a gold reconciliation
in-line with the updated resource model within 1%.
Importantly, the resource growth was also
achieved expeditiously, over a period of less than two years and at
discovery cost of less than US$7.5 per ounce gold equivalent. This
was driven by the strong continuity of the Kora and Judd vein
systems, with almost all holes intersecting the mineralized
structure.
Looking ahead, exploration at the Kora and Judd
vein systems will remain a major focus, with drilling targeting
multiple highly prospective target areas concurrently, including
Kora, Kora South, Kora Deeps, Judd, Judd South and Judd Deeps. Kora
Deeps and Judd Deeps have only recently commenced drilling from the
twin incline, and the initial reported results from this area via
Judd underground development in late-Q3 have been very promising,
including 4.6 m at 14.89 g/t AuEq and 6.8 m at 11.77 g/t AuEq from
channel sampling in an area previously sparsely drilled and
interpreted to be waste. Later in 2024, exploration plans to
commence at Kora South Deeps and Judd South Deeps, also from the
twin incline.
Beyond the Kora and Judd vein systems, there are
multiple highly prospective areas for resource growth near mine
infrastructure, including Arakompa, Maniape and Karempe.
Exploration pad construction at Arakompa, which hosts a historic
resource of 800 koz at 9.0 g/t Au, is underway with plans to
commence drilling near-term. Porphyry exploration continues to
progress, with drilling underway at A1 and plans for follow-up
drilling at the Blue Lake Porphyry in the medium term. Blue Lake
hosts an Inferred Resource of 10.8 moz AuEq or 4.7 blbs CuEq.
Recently, in October 2023, K92 increased its
exploration expenditure guidance to US$20 million. This was driven
by our conviction in the geological potential of the Kainantu
Project and we look forward to announcing results from multiple
target areas near-term in addition to operational announcements as
we transform Kainantu into a Tier 1 Mid-Tier producer over the next
18 months with construction of the Stage 3 and 4 Expansions
underway.”
Key Assumptions and
Parameters
Underground drilling consists of diamond core
for a range of core sizes depending on the length of hole and
expected ground conditions. Sampling is sawn half core under
geological control and generally ranges between 0.5m to 1.0m.
Underground face sampling is completed for every fired round and is
to industry standard. QAQC data indicated no significant issues
with the sampling or the accuracy of the on-site analysis. Current
core recovery of the mineral zone is +95%, with initial drilling
recoveries around the 90% mark.
Geological logging is consistent and is based on
a full set of logging codes covering lithology, alteration, and
mineralization. All sampling and analytical work for the mine
exploration program is performed by Intertek Testing Services (PNG)
LTD, an independent accredited laboratory that is located on site.
External check assays for QA/QC purposes are performed at SGS
Australia Pty Ltd in Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
The geological interpretation of the vein
systems is represented as 3D wireframe solids snapped to a
combination of diamond drillhole data and underground face sampling
(see Fig 1 and 5). Definition of the wireframes is based on
identified gold (and copper and silver) mineralization in drill
core nominally at a 0.1-0.2 g/t Au gold cut-off in conjunction with
geological control/sense and current mining widths. The Kora Link
is a broader zone of more variably continuous mineralization and
butts onto both the K1 and K2 lodes in various places. A total of 4
lodes were delineated for the Judd deposit, with a dominant J1 lode
and subordinate parallel lodes for J2, J3 and J1W.
The wireframes were used to extract 1-metre
‘best-fit’ composites (minimum of 0.5m) from the drillhole &
sampling database for gold, copper and silver. A total of 30,791
composites were used in the grade interpolation, 24,925 for Kora
and 5,866 for Judd. A gold top cut of 1000 g/t was applied to K2, a
400 g/t top cut was applied to the Kora Link and a 400 g/t top cut
was applied for the Judd composites. A top cut of 300 g/t was
applied to the silver composites but no top cuts was applied to the
copper composites. Variography was good for the mined areas of K1
and J1 (due to the face sampling) but only moderate to poor for
other areas, as would likely be expected for the style of
mineralization.
Grade interpolation of the composite data was
completed using Ordinary Kriging with a block size of 1m (X
direction) by 5m (Y direction) by 5m (Z direction). A larger block
size check model for Kora indicated no evidence of over-smoothing
of the gold grade with the smaller block size. A check model
excluding the face sampling data indicated no significant
difference in gold grade for the measured and indicated estimates
at Kora.
Density data was modelled using Ordinary Kriging
on a total of 2,778 sample measurements for the different lodes.
Density values were determined using the weight in air/weight in
water method (Archimedes Principle) on single pieces of
representative core. Default average density values were applied to
the different lodes where there was a lack of modelled data.
Average density for the global estimates are 2.77t/m3 for Kora and
2.61t/m3 for Judd.
A three-pass search strategy was used for the
grade interpolation. Search ellipse parameters are listed below. 4
search domains with varying ellipsoid orientations were used for
both of K1 and K2 with the search ellipse orientations generally
reflecting the subtle changes in dip and strike of the vein
systems. The much smaller Kora Link Lode required only 2 search
domains as did the J1 and J2 lodes at Judd.
Table 2 – Mineral Resource Search
Ellipse Pass Specifications
Pass No |
X radius(m) |
Y radius(m) |
Z radius(m) |
Min Data |
Min Octants |
Max Data |
1 |
2 |
25 |
25 |
12 |
4 |
32 |
2 |
4 |
50 |
50 |
12 |
4 |
32 |
3 |
12 |
125 |
125 |
6 |
2 |
32 |
Allocation of the classification of the Mineral
Resources is derived from the search pass numbers produced from the
grade interpolation which essentially is a function of the
drillhole and face sample data point distribution. Additional
considerations were included in the assessment of the
classification; in particular, the geological understanding and
complexity of the deposit, sample recovery, quality of the QAQC
sampling and outcomes, density data, check models and
reconciliation with production. Defined shapes were used to better
define the Measured Resource distribution (i.e. the removal of the
‘spotted dog’ effect).
Table 3 – Resource Classification by
Pass Category
Pass Category |
Resource Classification |
1 |
Measured |
2 |
Indicated |
3 |
Inferred |
All material mined within the mineral wireframes
up to the effective date has been removed from the resource model.
Gold reconciliation of the new resource model with the global mill
feed material up to the end of the third quarter for 2023 has been
reasonably good with the difference in gold ounces from the mill
being within ~1% of that estimated by the model.
The Inferred Mineral Resources in this estimate
have a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated
Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It
is reasonably expected that the majority of the Inferred Mineral
Resource could be updated to an Indicated Mineral Resource with
continued exploration.
Gold equivalents are calculated as AuEq = Au g/t
+ Cu%*1.6481+ Ag g/t*0.0114. Gold price US$1,700/oz; Silver
US$22.5/oz; Copper US$4.00/lb. Metal payabilities and recoveries
are incorporated into the AuEq formula. Recoveries of 95% for
copper and 80% for silver.
The estimate of Mineral Resources may be
materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title,
taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
Mineral Resources, which are not Mineral
Reserves, do not have demonstrated economic viability.
It is anticipated that the updated Mineral
Resource estimate will not result in a material change to the
mineral reserve estimate set forth in the Technical Report entitled
“Independent Technical Report, Kainantu Gold Mine Integrated
Development Plan, Kainantu Project, Papua New Guinea” with an
effective date of January 1, 2022 (the “IDP Technical Report”). In
addition, the increase to the Measured and Indicated mineral
resources and inferred mineral resources will not materially impact
the design parameters and conclusions outlined in the Kainantu
Stage 3 Expansion Definitive Feasibility Study Case or Kainantu
Stage 4 Expansion Preliminary Economic Assessment Case of the IDP
Technical Report. However, as a result of the updated Mineral
Resource estimate, the Company expects the potential mine life to
be extended for both the Stage 3 Expansion Definitive Feasibility
Study Case and Stage 4 Expansion Preliminary Economic Assessment
Case.
Qualified Persons
K92 mine geology manager and mine exploration
manager, Andrew Kohler, MAIG, a qualified person under the meaning
of Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure
for Mineral Projects, has reviewed and is responsible for the
technical content of this news release. Data verification by Mr.
Kohler includes significant time onsite reviewing drill core, face
sampling, underground workings, and discussing work programs and
results with geology and mining personnel.
Simon Tear, P.Geo of H & S Consultants Pty.
Ltd. of Sydney, Australia is a Qualified Person as defined under NI
43-101 for the Mineral Resource estimate discussed above. Mr. Tear
has reviewed and approved the contents of this press release in
relation to the Mineral Resources.
About K92
K92 Mining Inc. is engaged in the production of
gold, copper and silver at the Kainantu Gold Mine in the Eastern
Highlands province of Papua New Guinea, as well as exploration and
development of mineral deposits in the immediate vicinity of the
mine. The Company declared commercial production from Kainantu in
February 2018 and is in a strong financial position. A maiden
resource estimate on the Blue Lake copper-gold porphyry project was
completed in August 2022. K92 is operated by a team of mining
company professionals with extensive international mine-building
and operational experience.
On Behalf of the Company,
John Lewins, Chief Executive Officer and
Director
For further information, please contact David
Medilek, P.Eng., CFA, President at +1-604-416-4445
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION: This news release includes certain “forward-looking
statements” under applicable Canadian securities legislation. Such
forward-looking statements include, without limitation: (i) the
results of the Kainantu Mine Definitive Feasibility Study, and the
Kainantu 2022 Preliminary Economic Assessment, including the Stage
3 Expansion, a new standalone 1.2 mtpa process plant and supporting
infrastructure; (ii) statements regarding the expansion of the mine
and development of any of the deposits; (iii) the Kainantu Stage 4
Expansion, operating two standalone process plants, larger surface
infrastructure and mining throughputs; and (iv) the potential
extended life of the Kainantu Mine.
All statements in this news release that address
events or developments that we expect to occur in the future are
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are
statements that are not historical facts and are generally,
although not always, identified by words such as “expect”, “plan”,
“anticipate”, “project”, “target”, “potential”, “schedule”,
“forecast”, “budget”, “estimate”, “intend” or “believe” and similar
expressions or their negative connotations, or that events or
conditions “will”, “would”, “may”, “could”, “should” or “might”
occur. All such forward-looking statements are based on the
opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements
are made. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on
estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are
beyond our ability to control, that may cause our actual results,
level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially
different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking
information. Such factors include, without limitation, Public
Health Crises, including the COVID-19 virus; changes in the price
of gold, silver, copper and other metals in the world markets;
fluctuations in the price and availability of infrastructure and
energy and other commodities; fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates; volatility in price of our common shares; inherent
risks associated with the mining industry, including problems
related to weather and climate in remote areas in which certain of
the Company’s operations are located; failure to achieve
production, cost and other estimates; risks and uncertainties
associated with exploration and development; uncertainties relating
to estimates of mineral resources including uncertainty that
mineral resources may never be converted into mineral reserves; the
Company’s ability to carry on current and future operations,
including development and exploration activities; the timing,
extent, duration and economic viability of such operations,
including any mineral resources or reserves identified thereby; the
accuracy and reliability of estimates, projections, forecasts,
studies and assessments; the Company’s ability to meet or achieve
estimates, projections and forecasts; the availability and cost of
inputs; the availability and costs of achieving the Stage 3
Expansion or the Stage 4 Expansion; the ability of the Company to
achieve the inputs the price and market for outputs, including
gold, silver and copper; failures of information systems or
information security threats; political, economic and other risks
associated with the Company’s foreign operations; geopolitical
events and other uncertainties, such as the conflicts in Ukraine,
Israel and Palestine; compliance with various laws and regulatory
requirements to which the Company is subject to, including
taxation; the ability to obtain timely financing on reasonable
terms when required; the current and future social, economic and
political conditions, including relationship with the communities
in Papua New Guinea and other jurisdictions it operates; other
assumptions and factors generally associated with the mining
industry; and the risks, uncertainties and other factors referred
to in the Company’s Annual Information Form under the heading “Risk
Factors”.
Estimates of mineral resources are also
forward-looking statements because they constitute projections,
based on certain estimates and assumptions, regarding the amount of
minerals that may be encountered in the future and/or the
anticipated economics of production. The estimation of mineral
resources and mineral reserves is inherently uncertain and involves
subjective judgments about many relevant factors. Mineral resources
that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability. The accuracy of any such estimates is a function of the
quantity and quality of available data, and of the assumptions made
and judgments used in engineering and geological interpretation,
Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future
performance, and actual results and future events could materially
differ from those anticipated in such statements. Although we have
attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those contained in the
forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause
actual results to differ materially from those that are
anticipated, estimated, or intended. There can be no assurance that
such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and
future events could differ materially from those anticipated in
such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue
reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any
intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise, except as required by law.
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. READERS
CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL
RESOURCES
Information concerning the properties and
operations of K92 has been prepared in accordance with Canadian
standards under applicable Canadian securities laws and may not be
comparable to similar information for United States companies. The
terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated
Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” used in this
presentation are Canadian mining terms as defined in the Definition
Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by the
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
(“CIM”) on May 10, 2014 and incorporated by
reference in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure
for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). While the
terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated
Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” are recognized
and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not
defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”). As such, certain
information contained in this presentation concerning descriptions
of mineralization and resources under Canadian standards is not
comparable to similar information made public by United States
companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of
the SEC. An “Inferred Mineral Resource” has a great amount of
uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal
feasibility. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral
Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility
studies. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “Inferred
Mineral Resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher confidence
category through additional exploration drilling and technical
evaluation. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any
part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” exists or is economically or
legally mineable. Under United States standards, mineralization may
not be classified as a “Reserve” unless the determination has been
made that the mineralization could be economically and legally
produced or extracted at the time the Reserve estimation is made.
Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the
Measured or Indicated Mineral Resources will ever be converted into
Mineral Reserves. In addition, the definitions of “Proven Mineral
Reserves” and “Probable Mineral Reserves” under CIM standards
differ from the standards of the SEC. Historical results or
feasibility models presented herein are not guarantees or
expectations of future performance.
Figure 1 – Kora Resource Lode Wireframes
Long Section, Cross Section and Plan View
Figure 2 – K1 and K2 Resource Category
Long Sections
Figure 3 – K1 Resource Long
Section
(Resource Statement is for 3 g/t AuEq Cut-off
only)
Figure 4 – K2 Resource Long
Section
(Resource Statement is for 3 g/t AuEq Cut-off
only)
Figure 5 – Judd Resource Lode Wireframes
Long Section, Cross Section and Plan View
Figure 6 – J1 and J2 Resource Category
Long Sections
Figure 7 – J1 Resource Long
Section
(Resource Statement is for 3 g/t AuEq Cut-off
only)
Figure 8 – J2 Resource Long
Section
(Resource Statement is for 3 g/t AuEq Cut-off
only)
Figure 9 – Kora-Judd Vein System Long
Section
Figure 10 – Kora-Irumafimpa Vein System
Long Section
Figure 11 – Judd Vein System Long
Section
Figure 12 – Near Mine
Exploration Targets
Suite 488 - 1090 West Georgia StreetVancouver,
British ColumbiaCanada V6E 3V7
Telephone: +1 (604) 416-4445Facsimile: +1 (604)
608-9110www.k92mining.com
Photos accompanying this announcement are available
at:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/1cab52c2-e973-4240-9122-cd94f7c68417
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/e2b27c69-54bd-46ca-94ba-9434e5dd7027
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/43b6b440-a7e8-4898-9ff8-a820ae2205e4
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/111e024d-2d37-4ed4-b471-8d9bc4dacdf6
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/8df4f5a0-87f7-49f8-a3e4-d584097825e5
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/3b37c494-955c-44f9-aa03-13c07543f910
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/77201feb-c03c-4d65-99b0-85b69edb7c14
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/b62c23c1-3fdc-40a2-ae16-5e36cc70868a
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/9e2aefb1-96a3-44d5-915c-37dd1547574e
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/6bb8b6a5-877e-4a7f-acaa-c93e8f115dc6
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/642fb879-a484-4ec8-a542-a1201b09949b
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/df8bd013-0921-4e87-9a29-f91e92c93db7
K92 Mining (TSX:KNT)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Fev 2025 até Mar 2025
K92 Mining (TSX:KNT)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Mar 2024 até Mar 2025