UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM SD
Specialized Disclosure Report
Mobileye Global Inc.
(Exact name of the registrant as specified
in its charter)
| Delaware |
001-41541 |
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation) |
(Commission
File Number) |
| |
c/o Mobileye B.V.
Har Hotzvim, Shlomo Momo HaLevi Street
1
Jerusalem, Israel |
9777015 |
| (Address
of principal executive offices) |
(Zip
code) |
| |
Liz Cohen-Yerushalmi
+972-2-541-7333 |
| (Name
and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report.) |
Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which
this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:
| x | Rule 13p-1
under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1
to December 31, 2023 |
| ¨ | Rule 13q-1
under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13q-1) for the fiscal year ended _________ |
| SECTION 1 – | CONFLICT
MINERALS DISCLOSURE |
| Item 1.01 | Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report |
Conflict Minerals Disclosure
This Specialized Disclosure Report on Form SD and the Conflict
Minerals Report, filed as Exhibit 1.01 hereto, are publicly available at https://ir.mobileye.com/financial-information/sec-filings
as well as the SEC’s EDGAR database at www.sec.gov. The information contained on the Company’s website is not
a part of this Form SD and is not deemed incorporated by reference into this Form SD or any other public filing made with the
SEC.
The Conflict Minerals Report required by Item 1.01 is filed as Exhibit 1.01
to this Form SD.
SECTION 3 – EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1.01 – Conflict Minerals Report as required by Items 1.01 and 1.02 of this Form SD.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.
| Mobileye Global Inc. |
|
| (Registrant) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| By: |
/s/ Professor Amnon Shashua |
|
May 30, 2024 |
|
| |
Professor Amnon Shashua |
|
Date |
|
| |
Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
|
Exhibit 1.01
Conflict
Minerals Report
Mobileye Global Inc.
in
accord with Rule 13p-1
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
This Conflict Minerals Report (Report) of Mobileye Global Inc. (“Mobileye”
or “we”) for the year ended December 31, 2023 is presented to comply with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Rule). The Rule was adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to implement reporting requirements
related to “conflict minerals,” defined by the SEC as columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, gold, wolframite, and their
derivatives, which are currently limited to tantalum, tin, and tungsten.
The Rule imposes certain reporting obligations on SEC registrants
whose products contain conflict minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of their products (referred to as “conflict
minerals”). For products that contain necessary conflict minerals, the registrant must conduct in good faith a reasonable country
of origin inquiry designed to determine whether any of the necessary conflict minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
(DRC) or an adjoining country (collectively, the “Covered Countries”). If, based on such inquiry, the registrant knows or
has reason to believe that any of the necessary conflict minerals originated or may have originated in a Covered Country and may not be
solely from recycled or scrap sources, the registrant must conduct due diligence to determine if the necessary conflict minerals directly
or indirectly financed or benefited armed groups (as defined by the SEC in Form SD) in the Covered Countries.
Forward-Looking Statements
We caution that any forward-looking statements (as such term is defined
in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) contained in this Conflict Minerals Report involve risks and uncertainties and
are subject to change based on various factors, many of which are beyond our control. Among the factors that could cause actual results
to differ materially are the risks and uncertainties set forth in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on February 23, 2024. We are not under any obligation and do not intend to make publicly available any update
or other revisions to any of the forward-looking statements contained in this Conflict Minerals Report to reflect circumstances existing
after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of future events even if experience or future events make it clear that any
expected results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements will not be realized.
Overview of Mobileye’s Responsible Minerals Program and Commitment
to Responsible Sourcing
As set forth in our Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy, Mobileye
is committed to the responsible sourcing of conflict minerals, which we define as sourcing done in an ethical and sustainable manner that
safeguards the human rights of everyone in our global supply chain. Mobileye’s responsible minerals program examines human rights
risks in Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (CAHRAs) globally, as defined by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD) Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, Third Edition,
and related Supplements on Tin, Tantalum and Tungsten and on Gold (collectively, “OECD Guidance”).
Many of our hardware products contain tantalum, tin, tungsten and/or
gold ("3TG") necessary to the functionality or production of those products. Conflict minerals are obtained from sources worldwide,
and our desire is not to eliminate those originating in the Covered Countries and other CAHRAs, but rather to obtain conflict minerals
from sources that do not directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups or contribute to human rights abuses. We believe that
it is important for us and other companies to support responsible in-region mineral sourcing from the Covered Countries and other CAHRAs
and to not negatively affect the economies of such countries.
Products and Supply Chain Description
Mobileye systems that may contain necessary conflict minerals, and
which are covered in this Report, include:
| · | our Mobileye EyeQTM System-on-Chips (“SoCs”), such
as our EyeQ TM 2, EyeQ TM 3, EyeQ TM 4, EyeQ TM 5 and EyeQ TM6 SoCs; |
| · | our Mobileye SuperVisionTM system; and |
| · | our aftermarket product portfolio, including Mobileye 8 Connect and Shield+ |
Mobileye sells products
that are manufactured for us by other companies and products that include ready-made component parts that we purchase from third parties. Although
many of our hardware products contain conflict minerals, we do not purchase ore or unrefined conflict minerals from mines. We are many
steps removed in the supply chain from the mining of minerals and are therefore considered a “downstream” purchaser. We purchase
materials used in our products from a large network of suppliers; some of those materials contribute necessary conflict minerals to our
products. The origin of minerals cannot be determined with any certainty once the ores are smelted, refined, and converted to ingots,
bullion, or other derivatives. The smelters and refiners (referred to as “facilities”) are consolidating points for ore and
are in the best position in the total supply chain to know the origin of the ores. We rely on our suppliers to assist with our reasonable
country of origin inquiry and due diligence efforts, including the identification of smelters and refiners, for the minerals contained
in the materials which they supply to us.
Design of Responsible Minerals Program
The design of Mobileye’s responsible minerals program is in conformity
with the OECD Guidance specifically as it relates to our position in the minerals supply chain as a “downstream” purchaser.
Summarized below are the design components of our responsible minerals program as they relate to the five-step framework from the OECD
Guidance.
| 1. | Maintain strong company management systems: |
| · | Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy: Maintain a supply chain policy for minerals originating from CAHRAs, including conflict
minerals originating from the Covered Countries. This policy outlines our commitment to responsible mineral sourcing from CAHRAs, our
commitment to exercise due diligence consistent with the OECD Guidance, and expectations that our suppliers have similarly established
due diligence programs. Our policy is publicly available and can be found at https://ir.mobileye.com/corporate-governance/governance-overview. |
| · | Internal Responsible Minerals team: Our responsible minerals team monitors our Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy. We
review such efforts with our senior management from our Operations team. |
| · | Supply chain control system: Employ a supply chain system of controls and transparency through due diligence tools such as
the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT), a regularly updated 3TG sourcing BI report and survey designed by the Responsible Minerals
Initiative (RMI) to identify the smelters and refiners that process the necessary conflict minerals contained in our products and the
country of origin of those conflict minerals. We employ a database to assess due diligence information and maintain records relating to
our responsible minerals program for at least five years, in accordance with the OECD Guidance. |
| · | Supplier engagement: Feature requirements related to responsible minerals sourcing in our standard template for supplier contracts
and specifications so that current and future suppliers are obligated to comply with our policies on responsible minerals sourcing, including
participation in a supply chain survey and related due diligence activities. We communicate our Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy and
contractual requirements to relevant suppliers annually. |
| · | Company grievance mechanism: Employees, suppliers, and other stakeholders can direct any questions or concerns relating to
our responsible minerals program to: conflictminerals@mobileye.com. Employees also may report any concerns through our internal whistleblower
reporting mechanism. |
| 2. | Identify and assess risks in our supply chain: |
| · | Identify smelters and refiners in our supply chain: Identify direct suppliers that supply products to Mobileye that may contribute
necessary conflict minerals to our products. Conduct an annual supply chain survey requesting those direct suppliers to provide a conflict
minerals declaration, using the CMRT, designed to identify the conflict minerals contained in the products they supply to Mobileye, the
smelters and refiners that processed those conflict minerals, and the country of origin of those conflict minerals. We evaluate the completeness
and accuracy of the suppliers’ survey responses and contact suppliers whose survey response we identified as having contained incomplete
or potentially inaccurate information to seek additional clarifying information. |
| · | Identify the scope of the risk assessment: Our risk assessment is designed to identify risks in our supply chain. This includes
direct suppliers not meeting our contractual requirements related to conflict minerals as well as smelters and refiners that are not conformant
to a responsible mineral assurance program or that we have reason to believe may source conflict minerals from the Covered Countries.
We document mineral country of origin information for the smelters and refiners identified by the supply chain survey, as provided from
sources including the supply chain survey, responsible mineral assurance programs, and from publicly available sources such as smelter
and refiner websites. |
| · | Assess due diligence practices of smelters and refiners: Compare smelters and refiners identified by the supply chain survey
against the list of facilities that are conformant to a responsible mineral assurance program such as the RMI’s Responsible Minerals
Assurance Program (RMAP), and other RMI cross-recognized, independent third-party audit programs. Information regarding RMAP as well as
a list of RMI cross-recognized independent third-party audit programs can be found on the RMI’s website: http://www.responsiblemineralsinitiative.org/minerals-due-diligence/recognized-standards-or-programs/. |
| 3. | Execute a strategy to respond to identified risks: |
| · | Report findings to senior management: Provide progress reports to our Operations team senior management summarizing information
gathered during our annual supply chain survey, results from the risk assessment process and status of our risk mitigation efforts. |
| · | Devise and adopt a risk management plan: Maintain a risk management plan that includes due diligence reviews of suppliers,
smelters and refiners that may be sourcing or processing conflict minerals from Covered Countries and other CAHRAs which may not be from
recycled or scrap sources. Our due diligence measures are significantly based on responsible mineral assurance programs that evaluate
the procurement practices of the smelters and refiners that process and provide those conflict minerals to our supply chain. |
| · | Implement a risk management plan: Perform risk mitigation efforts to bring suppliers into conformity with our Responsible Minerals
Sourcing Policy or contractual requirements, which efforts may include working with direct suppliers to consider an alternative source
for the necessary conflict minerals |
| · | Ongoing risk monitoring: Monitor and track suppliers, smelters and refiners identified as not meeting the requirements set
forth in our Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy or contractual requirements to determine their progress in meeting those requirements. |
| 4. | Support the development and implementation of independent third-party audits of smelters’ and refiners’ sourcing: |
| · | Support responsible mineral assurance programs that carry out independent third-party audits of smelter and refiner facilities, such
as the RMAP, through our membership in the RMI. |
| 5. | Report on supply chain due diligence: |
| · | Publicly communicate our Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy on our company website at https://ir.mobileye.com/corporate-governance/governance-overview. |
| · | File a Form SD annually with the SEC. This information is publicly available on our company website at https://ir.mobileye.com/financial-information/sec-filings. |
The content of any website referred to in this Report is included for
general information only and is not incorporated by reference in this Report.
Description of Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry Efforts
For 2023, our reasonable country of origin inquiry (RCOI) efforts for
conflict minerals included conducting a supply chain survey of our direct suppliers (referred to as “surveyed suppliers”)
using the CMRT. The supply chain surveys requested our suppliers to identify the smelters and refiners and countries of origin of the
conflict minerals in products they supply to us. We compared the smelters and refiners identified in the surveys against the lists of
facilities which are conformant to a responsible mineral assurance program, such as the RMAP or RMI cross-recognized programs. RMAP and
RMI cross-recognized programs provided country of origin data for conformant smelters and refiners, including on an aggregate basis in
certain cases. We documented country of origin information for the smelter and refiner facilities identified by surveyed suppliers as
provided from sources including the supply chain survey and responsible mineral assurance programs.
Results of Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry Efforts
For 2023, Mobileye conducted a supply chain survey of 43 suppliers
that we determined may contribute necessary conflict minerals to our products.
The results of our RCOI as of May 1, 2024 are as follows:
| · | 100% of surveyed suppliers provided a CMRT in response to our supply chain survey request. |
| · | The surveyed suppliers identified 223 operational smelter and refiner facilities which may process the necessary conflict minerals
contained in the products provided to us. |
| · | We know or have reason to believe that a portion of the conflict minerals processed by at least 36 of these 223 smelters and refiners
may have originated in the Covered Countries and may not be solely from recycled or scrap sources. |
Conclusion Based on Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry
We have concluded in good faith that during 2023:
| a) | Mobileye manufactured and contracted with others to manufacture products as to which conflict minerals are necessary to the functionality
or production of our products. |
| b) | Based on our RCOI, we know or have reason to believe that a portion of the necessary conflict minerals contained in our products originated
or may have originated in the Covered Countries and know or have reason to believe that those necessary conflict minerals may not be solely
from recycled or scrap sources. |
As a result of the above conclusion and pursuant to the Rule, we undertook
due diligence measures on the source and chain of custody of the necessary conflict minerals in our products which we had reason to believe
may have originated from the Covered Countries and which may not have come from recycled or scrap sources. There is significant overlap
between our RCOI efforts and our due diligence measures performed.
Description of Due Diligence Measures Performed
Below is a description of the measures performed for this reporting
period, as of May 1 , 2024, to exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of the necessary conflict minerals contained
in our products:
| · | Conducted a supply chain survey of suppliers which we identified may be supplying Mobileye with products that contain necessary conflict
minerals using the CMRT, requesting country of origin information regarding the necessary conflict minerals and identification of smelters
and refiners that process such minerals. |
| · | Contacted surveyed suppliers on responses to supply chain surveys that we identified as having contained incomplete or potentially
inaccurate information to seek additional clarifying information. |
| · | Received a CMRT from 100% of our surveyed suppliers in response to our supply chain survey request. |
| · | Compared smelters and refiners identified by surveyed suppliers against the list of facilities that are conformant to a responsible
mineral assurance program. |
| · | Monitored and tracked surveyed suppliers, and smelters and refiners identified by surveyed suppliers, which we identified as not meeting
our Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy or contractual requirements, to determine their progress in meeting those requirements. |
| · | Performed risk mitigation efforts with surveyed suppliers we identified as not in conformity with our Responsible Minerals Sourcing
Policy or contractual requirements by working with them to bring them into compliance. |
Results of our Due Diligence Measures
Inherent Limitations on Due Diligence Measures
As a downstream purchaser of products which contain conflict minerals,
our due diligence measures can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance regarding the source and chain of custody of the necessary
conflict minerals. Our due diligence processes are based on the necessity of seeking data from our direct suppliers and those suppliers
seeking similar information within their supply chains to identify the original sources of the necessary conflict minerals. We also
rely, to a large extent, on information collected and provided by responsible mineral assurance programs. Such sources of information,
as well as any publicly available sources, may yield inaccurate or incomplete information and may be subject to fraud.
Another complicating factor is the unavailability of country of origin
and chain of custody information from our suppliers on a continuous, real-time basis. The supply chain of commodities such as conflict
minerals is a multi-step process operating more or less on a daily basis, with ore being delivered to smelters and refiners, with smelters
and refiners smelting or refining ores into metal containing derivatives such as ingots, with the derivatives being shipped, sold and
stored in numerous market locations around the world and with distributors and purchasers holding varying amounts of the derivatives in
inventory for use. Since we do not have direct contractual relationships with smelters and refiners, we rely on our direct suppliers
and the entire supply chain to gather and provide specific information about the date when the ore is smelted into a derivative and later
shipped, stored, sold, and first entered the stream of commerce. We directly seek sourcing data on a periodic basis from our direct suppliers
as well as certain smelters and refiners. We seek to use contract provisions requiring the suppliers to promptly update us in the
event the sourcing data changes. Our due diligence processes are ongoing throughout the year.
Surveyed Supplier Due Diligence Results
Mobileye evaluated the accuracy and completeness of the responses to
our supply chain surveys by our surveyed suppliers. We identified 6 surveyed suppliers whose initial survey response contained incomplete
or potentially inaccurate information. We used various methods to identify the incomplete or inaccurate information in the surveyed supplier’s
response, including verification checks conducted by third-party software or by members of our internal Responsible Minerals team. When
an incomplete or inaccurate response was identified, we contacted the applicable surveyed supplier, identified the incomplete or inaccurate
information, and requested that the surveyed supplier correct the incomplete or potentially inaccurate information and provide an updated
response. All 6 surveyed suppliers provided an updated CMRT which we determined, using the same evaluation criteria, to be complete and
accurate.
Upon receiving a survey response identified to be complete and accurate
based on our evaluation criteria, we further evaluated each response for conformity with our Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy or contractual
requirements. These requirements include that our surveyed suppliers must maintain a publicly available conflict minerals sourcing policy,
provide a CMRT upon our request, and use smelters and refiners which are either conformant to a responsible mineral assurance program
or have begun participating in such a program. We identified surveyed suppliers which were not fully compliant with all applicable requirements
and monitored and tracked these suppliers’ progress in meeting the applicable requirements. We performed risk mitigation efforts
by contacting each supplier, identifying action items that we requested the supplier complete, and asking the supplier to provide an updated
CMRT. Our risk mitigation efforts are specifically related to meeting our Responsible Minerals Sourcing Policy or contractual requirements,
with the goal of bringing each surveyed supplier into compliance with such requirements.
As a result of these supplier due diligence activities, Mobileye determined
that approximately 98% (42 out of 43) of the surveyed suppliers are, as of May 1 2024 in compliance with the Mobileye Responsible
Minerals Sourcing Requirements for 2023.
Smelter and Refiner Due Diligence Results
As of May 1, 2024, an aggregate of 223 operational smelters and
refiners were identified by our surveyed suppliers as facilities that may process the necessary conflict minerals contained in the products
these surveyed suppliers provided to Mobileye.
Mobileye conducted due diligence on the smelters and refiners reported
during our survey process. Our due diligence activities are dominated by a continual process to determine and monitor whether the identified
smelters and refiners are operational and therefore may contribute necessary conflict minerals to our final products, and whether they
are conformant to a responsible mineral assurance program or have begun participating in such a program. We sought reliable information
on the source and chain of custody of the conflict minerals processed by such facilities, including from publicly available sources, with
the goal to determine if any of these facilities processed conflict minerals that may have originated from the Covered Countries and other
CAHRAs, and may not be solely from recycled or scrap sources.
If a smelter or refiner in our supply chain was not yet conformant
to a responsible mineral assurance program or had not yet begun participating in such a program, Mobileye and other RMI member companies
proactively attempted to contact such facilities to request country of origin information for the conflict minerals the facilities processed,
as well as to encourage and assist their participation in a responsible mineral assurance program. We monitored and tracked smelters and
refiners which we identified as not being conformant to a responsible mineral assurance program or not having begun participating in such
a program.
We identified 4 smelter and refiner facilities reported in our supply
chain that were not conformant to a responsible mineral assurance program. These facilities were the focus of our smelter and refiner
due diligence activities for this reporting period and, as a result of our activities, we reasonably concluded that as of May 1,
2024:
| · | Two of these 4 smelter and refiner facilities have begun participating in a responsible mineral assurance program but are not yet
conformant. Based on Mobileye’s due diligence, we have no reason to believe these facilities sourced conflict minerals from the
Covered Countries. |
| · | The remaining 2 facilities are not participating in a responsible mineral assurance program and we have asked our suppliers to enroll
them or remove them from our supply chain. These smelters became non-compliant after Feb 1st 2024. |
As a result of our due diligence activities summarized above, we determined
the following as of May 1, 2024:
| · | 99% of the 223 smelters and refiners identified by our surveyed suppliers are either conformant to a responsible mineral assurance
program or have begun participating in such a program. |
| · | All 36 smelters and refiners which we know or have reason to believe may source conflict minerals from the Covered Countries, which
may not be solely from recycled or scrap sources, are conformant to a responsible mineral assurance program. |
| · | We have no reason to believe that any of the 223 smelter and refiner facilities directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups
in the Covered Countries. |
Below is a summary of the mineral country of origin information collected
as of May 1, 2024 as a result of our due diligence activities:
Table 1
| Country |
Mineral |
| Algeria |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Andorra |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Antigua and Barbuda |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Argentina |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Australia |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Austria |
Gold |
|
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Azerbaijan |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Bahamas |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Bangladesh |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Barbados |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Belarus |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
|
| Belgium |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Benin |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Bolivia |
Gold |
|
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Botswana |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Brazil |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Bulgaria |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Burkina Faso |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Burundi** |
|
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Cambodia |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Cameroon |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Canada |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
|
| Cayman Islands |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Chile |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| China |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Chinese Taipei |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Colombia |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Congo, Democratic Republic of the** |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Costa Rica |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Côte d'Ivoire |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Croatia |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Curacao |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Cyprus |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Czech Republic |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
|
| Denmark |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Dominican Republic |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Ecuador |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Egypt |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| El Salvador |
Gold |
Tantalum |
|
|
| Estonia |
Gold |
Tantalum |
|
|
| Ethiopia |
|
Tantalum |
|
|
| Fiji |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Finland |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| France |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
|
| French Guiana |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Georgia |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Germany |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Ghana |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Greece |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Grenada |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Guatemala |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Guinea |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Guyana |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Honduras |
|
|
Tin |
|
| Hong Kong |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
|
| Hungary |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Iceland |
|
|
|
|
| India |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Indonesia |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
|
| Ireland |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Israel |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Italy |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Jamaica |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Japan |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Jordan |
|
|
Tin |
|
| Kazakhstan |
Gold |
|
|
Tungsten |
| Kenya |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Korea, Republic of |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Kuwait |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Kyrgyzstan |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Latvia |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Lebanon |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Liberia |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Liechtenstein |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Lithuania |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Luxembourg |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Macao |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Madagascar |
|
Tantalum |
|
|
| Malaysia |
Gold |
|
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Mali |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Malta |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Mauritania |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Mauritius |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Mexico |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Monaco |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Mongolia |
Gold |
|
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Morocco |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Mozambique |
Gold |
Tantalum |
|
|
| Myanmar |
|
|
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Namibia |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Netherlands |
Gold |
|
Tin |
Tungsten |
| New Zealand |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Nicaragua |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Niger |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Nigeria |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Norway |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Oman |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Pakistan |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Panama |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Papua New Guinea |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Peru |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Philippines |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Poland |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Portugal |
Gold |
|
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Puerto Rico |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Romania |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Russia |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Rwanda** |
|
Tantalum |
|
Tungsten |
| Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Saudi Arabia |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Senegal |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Serbia |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Sierra Leone |
|
Tantalum |
|
|
| Singapore |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Sint Maarten |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Slovakia |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Slovenia |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| South Africa |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Spain |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| St Vincent and Grenadines |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Sudan |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Suriname |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Sweden |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Switzerland |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Tajikistan |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Tanzania** |
Gold |
|
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Thailand |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Trinidad and Tobago |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Tunisia |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Turkey |
Gold |
|
|
Tungsten |
| Turks and Caicos |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Uganda** |
|
|
|
Tungsten |
| Ukraine |
Gold |
|
|
|
| United Arab Emirates |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| United Kingdom |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| United States of America |
Gold |
Tantalum |
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Uruguay |
Gold |
|
Tin |
|
| Uzbekistan |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Vietnam |
Gold |
|
Tin |
Tungsten |
| Zambia** |
Gold |
|
|
|
| Zimbabwe |
Gold |
|
|
|
**Covered Countries
Summary of Smelter and Refiner Status
The table below summarize, by mineral, the numbers of operational smelter
and refiner facilities, identified by our surveyed suppliers, that as of May 1, 2024:
| (i) | are conformant to a responsible mineral assurance program (referred to as “Conformant”); |
| (ii) | have begun participating in a responsible mineral assurance program (referred to as “Active”; as noted above, we have
no reason to believe, based on our due diligence, that these facilities process conflict minerals originating from the Covered Countries);
or |
| (iii) | are not participating in the responsible mineral assurance program
(referred to as “Not Participating”; as noted above, we have no reason to believe, based on our due diligence, that these
facilities process conflict minerals originating from the Covered Countries). |
Status of Identified Smelters and Refiners
| Status | |
| Metal | |
Conformant | | |
Active | | |
Not Participating | | |
Grand Total | |
| Gold | |
| 91 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 95 | |
| Tantalum | |
| 32 | | |
| 0 | | |
| | | |
| 32 | |
| Tin | |
| 65 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 0 | | |
| 65 | |
| Tungsten | |
| 31 | | |
| | | |
| 0 | | |
| 31 | |
| Grand Total | |
| 219 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 2 | | |
| 223 | |
The table below (Table 2) lists the facilities which, to the extent
known, processed the necessary conflict minerals in our products based on responses received from our surveyed suppliers as of May 1,
2024. Mobileye conducts no direct transactions and has no contractual relationship with these smelter and refiner facilities nor their
sources of ore.
Table 2
| Metal |
Smelter or Refiner Name |
Country |
| Gold |
Abington Reldan Metals, LLC* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Gold |
Advanced Chemical Company** |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Gold |
Agosi AG* |
GERMANY |
| Gold |
Aida Chemical Industries Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex (AMMC)* |
UZBEKISTAN |
| Gold |
AngloGold Ashanti Corrego do Sitio Mineracao* |
BRAZIL |
| Gold |
Argor-Heraeus S.A.* |
SWITZERLAND |
| Gold |
Asahi Pretec Corp.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Asahi Refining Canada Ltd.* |
CANADA |
| Gold |
Asahi Refining USA Inc.* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Gold |
Asaka Riken Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Augmont Enterprises Private Limited |
INDIA |
| Gold |
Aurubis AG* |
GERMANY |
| Gold |
Bangalore Refinery** |
INDIA |
| Metal |
Smelter or Refiner Name |
Country |
| Gold |
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Central Bank of the Philippines)* |
PHILIPPINES |
| Gold |
Boliden Ronnskar* |
SWEDEN |
| Gold |
C. Hafner GmbH + Co. KG* |
GERMANY |
| Gold |
CCR Refinery - Glencore Canada Corporation* |
CANADA |
| Gold |
Chimet S.p.A.* |
ITALY |
| Gold |
Chugai Mining* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Daye Non-Ferrous Metals Mining Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Gold |
Dowa* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
DSC (Do Sung Corporation)* |
KOREA, REPUBLIC OF |
| Gold |
Eco-System Recycling Co., Ltd. East Plant* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Eco-System Recycling Co., Ltd. North Plant* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Eco-System Recycling Co., Ltd. West Plant* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
GGC Gujrat Gold Centre Pvt. Ltd. |
INDIA |
| Gold |
Gold by Gold Colombia* |
COLOMBIA |
| Gold |
Gold Refinery of Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Gold |
Great Wall Precious Metals Co., Ltd. of CBPM* |
CHINA |
| Gold |
Heimerle + Meule GmbH* |
GERMANY |
| Gold |
Heraeus Germany GmbH Co. KG* |
GERMANY |
| Gold |
Heraeus Metals Hong Kong Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Gold |
Inner Mongolia Qiankun Gold and Silver Refinery Share Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Gold |
Ishifuku Metal Industry Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Istanbul Gold Refinery* |
TURKEY |
| Gold |
Italpreziosi* |
ITALY |
| Gold |
Japan Mint* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Jiangxi Copper Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Gold |
JX Nippon Mining & Metals Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Kazzinc* |
KAZAKHSTAN |
| Gold |
Kennecott Utah Copper LLC* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Gold |
KGHM Polska Miedz Spolka Akcyjna* |
POLAND |
| Gold |
Kojima Chemicals Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Korea Zinc Co., Ltd.* |
KOREA, REPUBLIC OF |
| Gold |
L'Orfebre S.A.* |
ANDORRA |
| Gold |
LS MnM Inc.* |
KOREA, REPUBLIC OF |
| Gold |
LT Metal Ltd.* |
KOREA, REPUBLIC OF |
| Gold |
Materion* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Gold |
Matsuda Sangyo Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Metal Concentrators SA (Pty) Ltd.* |
SOUTH AFRICA |
| Gold |
Metalor Technologies (Hong Kong) Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Metal |
Smelter or Refiner Name |
Country |
| Gold |
Metalor Technologies (Singapore) Pte., Ltd.* |
SINGAPORE |
| Gold |
Metalor Technologies (Suzhou) Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Gold |
Metalor Technologies S.A.* |
SWITZERLAND |
| Gold |
Metalor USA Refining Corporation* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Gold |
Metalurgica Met-Mex Penoles S.A. De C.V.* |
MEXICO |
| Gold |
Mitsubishi Materials Corporation* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
MKS PAMP SA* |
SWITZERLAND |
| Gold |
MMTC-PAMP India Pvt., Ltd.* |
INDIA |
| Gold |
Nadir Metal Rafineri San. Ve Tic. A.S.* |
TURKEY |
| Gold |
Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Combinat* |
UZBEKISTAN |
| Gold |
NH Recytech Company* |
KOREA, REPUBLIC OF |
| Gold |
Nihon Material Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Ogussa Osterreichische Gold- und Silber-Scheideanstalt GmbH* |
AUSTRIA |
| Gold |
Ohura Precious Metal Industry Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Planta Recuperadora de Metales SpA* |
CHILE |
| Gold |
PT Aneka Tambang (Persero) Tbk* |
INDONESIA |
| Gold |
PX Precinox S.A.* |
SWITZERLAND |
| Gold |
Rand Refinery (Pty) Ltd.* |
SOUTH AFRICA |
| Gold |
REMONDIS PMR B.V.* |
NETHERLANDS |
| Gold |
Royal Canadian Mint* |
CANADA |
| Gold |
SAFINA A.S.* |
CZECHIA |
| Gold |
SEMPSA Joyeria Plateria S.A.* |
SPAIN |
| Gold |
Shandong Gold Smelting Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Gold |
Shandong Zhaojin Gold & Silver Refinery Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Gold |
Sichuan Tianze Precious Metals Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Gold |
Solar Applied Materials Technology Corp.* |
TAIWAN, PROVINCE OF CHINA |
| Gold |
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
SungEel HiMetal Co., Ltd.* |
KOREA, REPUBLIC OF |
| Gold |
T.C.A S.p.A* |
ITALY |
| Gold |
Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Tokuriki Honten Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
TOO Tau-Ken-Altyn* |
KAZAKHSTAN |
| Gold |
Torecom* |
KOREA, REPUBLIC OF |
| Gold |
Umicore S.A. Business Unit Precious Metals Refining* |
BELGIUM |
| Gold |
United Precious Metal Refining, Inc.* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Gold |
Valcambi S.A.* |
SWITZERLAND |
| Gold |
WEEEREFINING* |
FRANCE |
| Gold |
Western Australian Mint (T/a The Perth Mint)* |
AUSTRALIA |
| Metal |
Smelter or Refiner Name |
Country |
| Gold |
WIELAND Edelmetalle GmbH* |
GERMANY |
| Gold |
Yamakin Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Yokohama Metal Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Gold |
Zhongyuan Gold Smelter of Zhongjin Gold Corporation* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
AMG Brasil* |
BRAZIL |
| Tantalum |
D Block Metals, LLC* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Tantalum |
F&X Electro-Materials Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
FIR Metals & Resource Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
Global Advanced Metals Aizu* |
JAPAN |
| Tantalum |
Global Advanced Metals Boyertown* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Tantalum |
Hengyang King Xing Lifeng New Materials Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
Jiangxi Dinghai Tantalum & Niobium Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
Jiangxi Tuohong New Raw Material* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
JiuJiang JinXin Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
Jiujiang Tanbre Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
Jiujiang Zhongao Tantalum & Niobium Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
KEMET de Mexico* |
MEXICO |
| Tantalum |
Materion Newton Inc.* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Tantalum |
Metallurgical Products India Pvt., Ltd.* |
INDIA |
| Tantalum |
Mineracao Taboca S.A.* |
BRAZIL |
| Tantalum |
Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Tantalum |
Ningxia Orient Tantalum Industry Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
NPM Silmet AS* |
ESTONIA |
| Tantalum |
QuantumClean* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Tantalum |
Resind Industria e Comercio Ltda.* |
BRAZIL |
| Tantalum |
RFH Yancheng Jinye New Material Technology Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
Taki Chemical Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Tantalum |
TANIOBIS Co., Ltd.* |
THAILAND |
| Tantalum |
TANIOBIS GmbH* |
GERMANY |
| Tantalum |
TANIOBIS Japan Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Tantalum |
TANIOBIS Smelting GmbH & Co. KG* |
GERMANY |
| Tantalum |
Telex Metals* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Tantalum |
Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC* |
KAZAKHSTAN |
| Tantalum |
XIMEI RESOURCES (GUANGDONG) LIMITED* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
XinXing HaoRong Electronic Material Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tantalum |
Yanling Jincheng Tantalum & Niobium Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Metal |
Smelter or Refiner Name |
Country |
| Tin |
Alpha* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Tin |
Aurubis Beerse* |
BELGIUM |
| Tin |
Aurubis Berango* |
SPAIN |
| Tin |
Chenzhou Yunxiang Mining and Metallurgy Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tin |
Chifeng Dajingzi Tin Industry Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tin |
China Tin Group Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tin |
CRM Fundicao De Metais E Comercio De Equipamentos Eletronicos Do Brasil Ltda* |
BRAZIL |
| Tin |
CRM Synergies* |
SPAIN |
| Tin |
CV Ayi Jaya* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
CV Venus Inti Perkasa* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
Dowa* |
JAPAN |
| Tin |
DS Myanmar* |
MYANMAR |
| Tin |
EM Vinto* |
BOLIVIA (PLURINATIONAL STATE OF) |
| Tin |
Estanho de Rondonia S.A.* |
BRAZIL |
| Tin |
Fabrica Auricchio Industria e Comercio Ltda.* |
BRAZIL |
| Tin |
Fenix Metals* |
POLAND |
| Tin |
Gejiu Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tin |
Guangdong Hanhe Non-Ferrous Metal Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tin |
HuiChang Hill Tin Industry Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tin |
Jiangxi New Nanshan Technology Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tin |
Luna Smelter, Ltd.* |
RWANDA |
| Tin |
Magnu's Minerais Metais e Ligas Ltda.* |
BRAZIL |
| Tin |
Malaysia Smelting Corporation (MSC)* |
MALAYSIA |
| Tin |
Metallic Resources, Inc.* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Tin |
Mineracao Taboca S.A.* |
BRAZIL |
| Tin |
Minsur* |
PERU |
| Tin |
Mitsubishi Materials Corporation* |
JAPAN |
| Tin |
O.M. Manufacturing (Thailand) Co., Ltd.* |
THAILAND |
| Tin |
O.M. Manufacturing Philippines, Inc.* |
PHILIPPINES |
| Tin |
Operaciones Metalurgicas S.A.* |
BOLIVIA (PLURINATIONAL STATE OF) |
| Tin |
PT Aries Kencana Sejahtera* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Artha Cipta Langgeng* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT ATD Makmur Mandiri Jaya* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Babel Inti Perkasa* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Babel Surya Alam Lestari* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Bangka Prima Tin* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Bangka Serumpun* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Belitung Industri Sejahtera* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Bukit Timah* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Cipta Persada Mulia* |
INDONESIA |
| Metal |
Smelter or Refiner Name |
Country |
| Tin |
PT Menara Cipta Mulia* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Mitra Stania Prima* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Mitra Sukses Globalindo* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Premium Tin Indonesia* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Prima Timah Utama* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Putera Sarana Shakti (PT PSS)* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Rajawali Rimba Perkasa* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Rajehan Ariq* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Refined Bangka Tin* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Stanindo Inti Perkasa* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Sukses Inti Makmur (SIM)* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Timah Tbk Kundur* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Timah Tbk Mentok* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Tinindo Inter Nusa* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
PT Tommy Utama* |
INDONESIA |
| Tin |
Resind Industria e Comercio Ltda.* |
BRAZIL |
| Tin |
Rui Da Hung* |
TAIWAN, PROVINCE OF CHINA |
| Tin |
Super Ligas* |
BRAZIL |
| Tin |
Thaisarco* |
THAILAND |
| Tin |
Tin Smelting Branch of Yunnan Tin Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tin |
Tin Technology & Refining* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Tin |
White Solder Metalurgia e Mineracao Ltda.* |
BRAZIL |
| Tin |
Yunnan Chengfeng Non-ferrous Metals Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tin |
Yunnan Yunfan Non-ferrous Metals Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
A.L.M.T. Corp.* |
JAPAN |
| Tungsten |
Asia Tungsten Products Vietnam Ltd.* |
VIET NAM |
| Tungsten |
China Molybdenum Tungsten Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Chongyi Zhangyuan Tungsten Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Cronimet Brasil Ltda* |
BRAZIL |
| Tungsten |
Fujian Xinlu Tungsten Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Ganzhou Jiangwu Ferrotungsten Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Ganzhou Seadragon W & Mo Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Global Tungsten & Powders LLC* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Tungsten |
Guangdong Xianglu Tungsten Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
H.C. Starck Tungsten GmbH* |
GERMANY |
| Tungsten |
Hubei Green Tungsten Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Hunan Chenzhou Mining Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Hunan Shizhuyuan Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd. Chenzhou Tungsten Products Branch* |
CHINA |
| Metal |
Smelter or Refiner Name |
Country |
| Tungsten |
Japan New Metals Co., Ltd.* |
JAPAN |
| Tungsten |
Jiangwu H.C. Starck Tungsten Products Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Jiangxi Gan Bei Tungsten Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Jiangxi Tonggu Non-ferrous Metallurgical & Chemical Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Jiangxi Xinsheng Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Jiangxi Yaosheng Tungsten Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Kennametal Fallon* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Tungsten |
Kennametal Huntsville* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Tungsten |
Lianyou Metals Co., Ltd.* |
TAIWAN, PROVINCE OF CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Malipo Haiyu Tungsten Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Masan High-Tech Materials* |
VIET NAM |
| Tungsten |
Niagara Refining LLC* |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| Tungsten |
Philippine Chuangxin Industrial Co., Inc.* |
PHILIPPINES |
| Tungsten |
TANIOBIS Smelting GmbH & Co. KG* |
GERMANY |
| Tungsten |
Wolfram Bergbau und Hutten AG* |
AUSTRIA |
| Tungsten |
Xiamen Tungsten (H.C.) Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| Tungsten |
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.* |
CHINA |
| † | Smelter and refiner facility names and locations as reported by the RMI as of May 1, 2024. |
| * | Denotes smelters and refiners which are conformant to a responsible mineral assurance program as of May 1, 2024. |
| ** | Denotes smelters and refiners which are participating in a responsible mineral assurance program as of May 1, 2024. |
Conclusion and Future Due Diligence
Measures
The facilities reported in Table 2 processed the necessary conflict
minerals in our products based on responses received from 100% of our surveyed suppliers as of May 1, 2024. As of May 1, 2024,
99% of the reported smelter and refiner facilities are conformant or are participating in a responsible mineral assurance program. All
smelters and refiners which we know or have reason to believe may source conflict minerals from the Covered Countries which may not be
solely from recycled or scrap sources are conformant to a responsible mineral assurance program as of May 1, 2024. We have no reason
to believe that any of the reported smelter and refiner facilities directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups in the Covered
Countries. We are continuing to engage in the activities described above in “Design of Responsible Minerals Program” and we
are continuing to follow up with suppliers that are not meeting our requirements as well as contacting smelters and refiners that are
not yet conformant to a responsible mineral assurance program. We are encouraging and assisting such smelters and refiners to become conformant
to a responsible mineral assurance program, thus supporting our efforts to build ethical and socially responsible supply chains for our
company.
Our efforts to determine the mine or location of origin of the necessary
conflict minerals in all our products with the greatest possible specificity consisted of the due diligence measures described in this
Report. In particular, we relied on the information made available by responsible mineral assurance programs for the smelters and refiners
in our supply chain because such programs review and audit whether sufficient evidence exists regarding the mine and/or location of origin
of the conflict minerals that the audited smelter and refiner facilities have processed.
Mobileye Global (NASDAQ:MBLY)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Mai 2024 até Jun 2024
Mobileye Global (NASDAQ:MBLY)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jun 2023 até Jun 2024
