The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these condensed consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
1. |
Description of Business |
Intrusion Inc. (together
with its condensed consolidated subsidiaries, the “Company”, “Intrusion”, “Intrusion Inc.”, “we”,
“us”, “our”, or similar terms) was organized in Texas in September 1983 and reincorporated in Delaware in October
1995. Our principal executive offices are located at 101 East Park Boulevard, Suite 1200, Plano, Texas 75074, and our telephone number
is (972) 234-6400. Our website URL is www.intrusion.com.
The Company develops, sells
and supports products that protect any-sized company or government organization by fusing advanced threat intelligence with real-time
mitigation to kill cyberattacks as they occur – including Zero-Days. The Company markets and distributes the Company’s solutions
through value-added resellers, managed service providers and a direct sales force. The Company’s end-user customers include U.S.
federal government entities, state and local government entities, and companies ranging in size from mid-market to large enterprises.
TraceCop (“TraceCop™”)
and Savant (“Savant™”) are registered trademarks of Intrusion Inc. The Company has applied
for trademark protection for the Company’s new INTRUSION Shield cybersecurity solution.
The accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Item
10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial
statements. All adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for
the interim periods have been made and are of a recurring nature unless otherwise disclosed herein. The results of operations for such
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for a full year. These condensed consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 31,
2023. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company calculates the
fair value of its assets and liabilities which qualify as financial instruments and includes this additional information in the notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements when the fair value is different from the carrying value of these financial instruments.
The estimated fair value of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their carrying amounts due to the relatively
short maturity of these instruments. Notes payable and financing and operating leases approximate fair value as they bear market rates
of interest. None of these instruments are held for trading purposes.
Going Concern
The accompanying financial
statements have been prepared assuming that the company will continue as a going concern. As of March 31, 2023, the Company had cash and
cash equivalents of $0.4 million and a working capital deficit of $12.6 million. In addition, the Company has incurred net operating losses
during the last three years. The Company’s principal sources of cash for funding operations in 2022 was through the issuance of
the two Streeterville notes which contributed $9.3 million, net of issuance costs and $6.4 million from the sale and issuance of common
stock and warrants. The Streeterville notes discussed in Note 4 have maturities of September 10, and December 29, 2023. These conditions
raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. Management plans to fund the operations of the
Company through additional debt or equity financing. If the Company is not able to obtain additional debt or equity financing, the Company
may be unable to implement the Company’s business plan, fund its liquidity needs or even continue its operations. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets and liabilities that may be necessary
if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
The audit opinion that accompanied
the Company’s financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, was qualified in that the Company’s auditors
expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
3. |
Right-of-use Asset and Leasing Liabilities |
The Company has operating
and finance leases where it records the right-of-use assets and a related lease liability as required under ASC 842. The lease liabilities
are determined by the net present value of total lease payments and amortized over the life of the lease. All obligations under the Company’s
lease agreements are designed to terminate with the last scheduled payment. The Company’s leases are for the following types of
assets:
|
· |
Computer hardware and copy machines- The Company’s finance lease right-of-use assets consist of computer hardware and copy machines. These leases have a three-year life and are in various stages of completion. |
|
· |
Office space - The Company’s operating lease right-of-use assets include its rental agreements for its offices in Plano, TX, and a data service center in Allen, TX. The Plano operating lease liability expires this year. The data service center operating lease liability has a life of two years and seven months as of March 31, 2023. |
In accordance with ASC 842,
the Company has elected practical expedients to combine lease and non-lease components, which consist principally of common area maintenance
charges, for all classes of underlying assets and to exclude leases with an initial term of 12 months or less.
As the implicit rate is not
readily determinable for the Company's lease agreements, the Company uses an estimated incremental borrowing rate to determine the initial
present value of lease payments. This discount rate for the leases approximates the federal reserve’s prime rate.
For the three months ended
March 21, 2023, and 2022, the Company had $86 and $75 thousand, respectively, in lease payments related to operating leases and had $14
and $7 thousand, respectively, in lease payments related to financing leases.
Schedule of Items Appearing on the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations (in thousands):
Lease cost table | |
| | |
| |
| |
Three Months Ended | |
| |
March 31, 2023 | | |
March 31, 2022 | |
Operating expense: | |
| | | |
| | |
Amortization Expense – Finance ROU | |
$ | 166 | | |
$ | 166 | |
Lease expense – Operating ROU | |
$ | 77 | | |
$ | 95 | |
Other expense: | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest Expense – Finance ROU | |
$ | 6 | | |
$ | 7 | |
Future minimum lease obligations consisted of the following as of
March 31, 2023 (in thousands):
Future minimum lease obligations | | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
Operating | | |
Finance | | |
| |
Period ending December 31, | | |
ROU Leases | | |
ROU Leases | | |
Total | |
Remaining 2023 | | |
$ | 217 | | |
$ | 661 | | |
$ | 878 | |
2024 | | |
| 123 | | |
| 8 | | |
| 131 | |
2025 | | |
| 115 | | |
| 3 | | |
| 118 | |
Thereafter | | |
| – | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
| | |
$ | 455 | | |
$ | 672 | | |
$ | 1,127 | |
Less Interest* | | |
| (16 | ) | |
| (9 | ) | |
| | |
| | |
$ | 439 | | |
$ | 663 | | |
| | |
* Interest is imputed for operating ROU leases and classified as lease expense and is included in operating expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
On March 10, 2022,
Intrusion Inc. entered into an unsecured loan agreement with Streeterville Capital, LLC whereby the Company could draw up to $10.0
million in two separate tranches of $5.0 million through the issuance of two separate promissory notes of $5.4 million each, with an
initial interest rate of 7%, subject to some increases in the case of, among other things, an event of default. On March 10, 2022,
the Company received $4.6
million in net funds from the first tranche (Note 1) pursuant to a promissory note executed contemporaneously with the execution of
the loan agreement. On June 29, 2022, the Company received an additional $4.7
million in net funds from the second tranche (Note 2) pursuant to a promissory note. Each note has an 18-month maturity, may be
prepaid subject to varying prepayment premiums, and may be redeemed at any time after six months into the term of such note in
amounts up to $0.5 million per calendar month upon the noteholder’s election. The Company has the option, in its sole
discretion, to satisfy any redemption demands in cash or shares of its common stock that will be issued in an amount equal to the
dollar amount of the redemption demand divided by the number that represents 85% of the average of the two lowest daily volume
weighted average prices of common stock over a fifteen-day trailing period. This option to settle in shares at a 15% discount is
deemed a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). Any remaining indebtedness at maturity is payable in cash.
The loan agreement and accompanying
notes are subject to standard and customary events of default, including, without limitation, the Company’s continued listing on
the Nasdaq or New York Stock Exchange. While the notes remain outstanding, the Company will be subject to certain conditions and restrictions,
including, without limitation the following: the noteholder’s right to consent to any future variable rate transactions (excluding
ATMs, equity offerings, or private placements without market adjustable features) and any debt (excluding bank loans, lines of credit,
mortgagees, leases, or asset backed loans); the noteholder’s right to participate in any debt or equity financings, excluding (ATMs,
loans, lines of credit, mortgagees, leases, or asset backed loans); a prohibition on the Company’s ability to extend or enter into
any agreement restricting its ability to issue common stock under the notes; as well as a prohibition on its ability to permit any other
lender to participate alongside the noteholder via any debt financing structures.
The Company evaluated the
Note 1 and Note 2 in accordance with ASC 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” because the promissory note (1)
embodies an option redemption obligation, (2) may require the Company to settle the optional redemption obligation by issuing a variable
number of its common shares, and (3) is based solely on a fixed monetary amount known at inception.
The lender does not benefit
if the fair value of the Company’s Common Stock increases and does not bear the risk that the fair value of the Company’s
Common Stock might decrease. In accordance with ASC 480, the promissory notes have been recorded as a liability and the company is recording
interest expense over the term of the promissory note is being recorded using the interest method from ASC 835-30, to accrete the carrying
amount of the promissory note up to the redemption common stock settlement amount.
On March 10, 2022, the Company
recorded debt issue costs of $0.7 million to be amortized over the 18-month term associated with the Note 1. On June 29, 2022, the Company
recorded debt issue costs of $0.7 million to be amortized over the 18-month term associated with the Note 2. As of March 31, 2023, the
balance of unamortized debt issuance costs for both notes were $0.6 million. For the period ended March 31, 2023, and 2022, the Company
recorded $0.3 million and $37 thousand for amortization of the debt issue costs, respectively, related to both notes to interest expense
in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
For the period ended March
31, 2023, and 2022, the Company recorded $0.3 million and $23 thousand, respectively of interest expense in the accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The interest recorded associated with the unsecured promissory notes increases the associated notes
payable on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The balances on the notes payable mature in September and December
2023. The effective interest rate of the notes payable including amortization of the debt issuance costs and accretion of BCF is 23.9%.
On January 11, 2023, the
Company amended the promissory notes issued pursuant to the unsecured loan agreement with Streeterville Capital, LLC whereby the
noteholder agreed to waive their redemption rights through March 31, 2023, in exchange for a fee equal to 3.75% of the outstanding
principal balance which increased the outstanding indebtedness due at maturity with Streeterville Capital, LLC and increased the
associated debt issuance costs recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets by $0.4 million. Subsequent to March 31, 2023,
no redemptions have been made to date.
5. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
The Company is periodically
involved in various litigation claims asserted in the normal course of its business. The Company believes these actions are routine and
incidental to the business. While the outcome of these actions cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that any
will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business.
Class Action Litigation
On April 16, 2021, a class
action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, captioned Celeste v. Intrusion
Inc. et al., Case No. 4:21-cv-00307 (E.D. Tex.) against the Company, the Company’s now-former chief financial officer, and now-former
chief executive officer alleging, among other things, that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements or omissions about the
Company’s business, operations, and prospects in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, as well as Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Celeste lawsuit
claimed compensatory damages and legal fees.
On May 14, 2021, a related
class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, captioned Neely v. Intrusion
Inc., et al., Case No. 4:12-cv-00374 (E.D. Tex.) against the Company, the Company’s now-former chief financial officer, and now-former
chief executive officer. The Neely lawsuit alleged the same violations under the federal securities laws as those alleged in the Celeste
lawsuit. The Neely lawsuit also sought compensatory damages and legal fees.
On November 23, 2021, the
Court consolidated the Celeste and Neely actions, and appointed a lead plaintiff and lead plaintiff’s counsel. The lead plaintiff
filed his amended complaint on February 7, 2022. The amended complaint named the following additional parties as named defendants: Mr.
Michael Paxton, a former director and executive officer; Mr. Gary Davis, a former officer; Mr. Joe Head, the current chief technology
officer, and a former director; and Mr. James Gero, a current director and chair of the compensation committee.
The parties to the consolidated
action held a mediation on April 5, 2022, at the conclusion of which the parties executed a settlement term sheet setting forth the material
terms associated with the resolution of the action, subject to the preparation of formal documents and a plan of distribution approved
by the Court. The settlement agreement was subject to certain terms and conditions and received final approval by the Court on December
16, 2022. At that time, a final judgment was entered dismissing the case, with the Court retaining jurisdiction over the action for purposes
of enforcing the terms of the class settlement agreement. The $3.3 million settlement was paid by the Company’s insurance provider
under its insurance policy as the Company’s retention had previously been exhausted.
The lead plaintiff in the
class action filed a motion for distribution of settlement funds on February 21, 2023. The Court approved the parties’ class action
settlement and plan of allocation on March 22, 2023, and cancelled the previously rescheduled March 31, 2023, hearing on the motion for
distribution, all remaining matters in the class action then-pending having been fully and finally adjudicated.
Securities Investigation
On August 8, 2021, the Company
received a notification from the Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Enforcement, that it was investigating captioned In the
Matter of Intrusion Inc. and requesting the Company produce certain documents and information. On November 9, 2021, the Securities and
Exchange Commission served a subpoena to the Company in connection with this investigation which formally requested substantially similar
information as in the prior request. The Company is continuing to comply with the requests and is cooperating in the investigation. The
Company can offer no assurances as to the outcome of this investigation or its potential effect on the Company or its results of operations.
Stockholder Derivative Claim
On June 3, 2022, a verified
stockholder derivative complaint was filed in U.S. District Court, District of Delaware by plaintiff Nathan Prawitt (the “Plaintiff
Stockholder”) on behalf of Intrusion against certain of the Company’s current and former officers and directors (the “Defendants”).
Plaintiff alleges that Defendants through various actions breached their fiduciary duties, wasted corporate assets, and unjustly enriched
Defendants by (a) incurring costs and expenses in connection with the ongoing SEC investigation, (b) incurring costs and expenses to defend
the Company with respect to the consolidated class action, (c) settling class-wide liability with respect to the consolidated class action,
as well as ancillary claims regarding sales of the Company’s common stock by certain of the Defendants. The Plaintiff is seeking
remedial actions including improvements in the Company’s corporate governance and internal control policies and reimbursement of
legal costs. While the Company is not a named defendant, but a nominal plaintiff in the stockholder derivative claim, the Company will
be providing the financial and other assistance for each of the Defendants that the Company is obligated to provide under the Company’s
Articles of Incorporation, the Company’s Bylaws, as well as individual indemnifications agreements that are in effect between, the
Company and each of the Defendants.
In addition to these legal
proceedings, the Company is subject to various other claims that may arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe
that any claims exist where the outcome of such matters would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated
financial position, operating results, or cash flows. However, there can be no assurance such legal proceedings will not have a material
impact on the Company’s future results.
ATM Offering
In August of 2021, the Company
engaged B. Riley Securities, Inc. to act as sales agent under the Company’s at-the-market program, which allows us to potentially
sell up to $50.0 million of its common stock using a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed on August 5, 2021. On March 31, 2023,
the date we filed our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, the Company became subject of the offering
limits in General Instruction I.B.6 of Form S-3. As a result, the Company filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus
relating to the registration of offerings under the program that reduced the amount the Company may sell to aggregate proceeds of up to
$15 million.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2023, the Company has received proceeds of approximately $21 thousand net of fees from the sale of common
stock pursuant to the program. As of March 31, 2023, the Company has received proceeds of approximately $7.5 million net of fees from
the sales of 1,845 thousand shares of common stock since the inception of the program.
7. |
Stock-Based Compensation |
The Company accounts for
stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, which requires that compensation
related to all stock-based awards be recognized in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Stock-based compensation cost is valued
at fair value at the date of grant, and the grant date fair value is recognized as expense over each award’s requisite service period
with a corresponding increase to equity based on the terms of each award and the appropriate accounting treatment under ASC 718.
The Company has three stock-based
compensation plans as of March 31, 2023, and 2022. These plans include the 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan
and the 2005 Stock incentive plan. These plans are discussed in detail in our Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2022, filed with the SEC.
The Company grants stock
from both the 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan and the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan. These plans provide a means through which the Company may
attract and retain key personnel and to provide a means whereby directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors of the Company
can acquire and maintain an equity interest in the Company, or be paid incentive compensation, including incentive compensation measured
by reference to the value of common stock, thereby strengthening their commitment to the welfare of the Company and aligning their interests
with those of the Company’s stockholders.
During the periods ended
March 31, 2023, and 2022, the Company did not issue any Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs). The Company recognized compensation expense related
to its RSAs of $0.1 and $0.2 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2023, there was $0.1 million unrecognized compensation cost related
to unvested RSAs.
During the periods ended
March 31, 2023, the Company granted 561 thousand stock options. During the period ended March 31, 2022, the Company granted 167.5 thousand
stock options. During the periods ended March 31, 2023, and 2022 the Company recognized compensation expense related to its stock option
awards of $(4) thousand and $0.2 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2023, there was $1.0 million unrecognized compensation cost related
to unvested stock options.
The
following table summarizes the activities for the Company’s stock options for the three months ended March 31, 2023:
Schedule of stock option activities | | |
| | |
| |
| | |
March 31, 2023 | |
| | |
Number of Options (in thousands) | | |
Weighted-Average Exercise Price | |
Outstanding at beginning of period | | |
| 668 | | |
$ | 5.22 | |
Granted | | |
| 561 | | |
| 1.24 | |
Exercised | | |
| (67 | ) | |
| .48 | |
Forfeited | | |
| (54 | ) | |
| 9.54 | |
Cancelled | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Expired | | |
| – | | |
| – | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2023 | | |
| 1,108 | | |
$ | 3.28 | |
Options exercisable at March 31, 2023 | | |
| 337 | | |
$ | 10.77 | |
Valuation Assumptions
The fair values of employee
stock option awards were estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
Valuation assumptions for stock-based compensation | |
| | |
| |
| |
For Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 | | |
For Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Weighted average grant date fair value | |
$ | 1.08 | | |
$ | 3.34 | |
Weighted average assumptions used: | |
| | | |
| | |
Expected dividend yield | |
| 0.0% | | |
| 0.0% | |
Risk-free interest rate | |
| 3.69% | | |
| 0.88% | |
Expected volatility | |
| 115.4% | | |
| 133.0% | |
Expected life (in years) | |
| 6.5 | | |
| 6.6 | |
Expected volatility is based
on historical volatility and in part on implied volatility. The expected term considers the contractual term of the option as well as
historical exercise and forfeiture behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based on the rates in effect on the grant date for U.S. Treasury
instruments with maturities matching the relevant expected term of the award.
The Company generally recognizes
product revenue upon shipment or after meeting certain performance obligations. These products can include hardware, software subscriptions
and consulting services. The Company also offers software on a subscription basis subject to software as a service (“SAAS”).
Warranty costs and sales returns have not been material.
The Company recognizes sales
of its consulting services in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 606 whereby revenue from contracts with customers are recognized once the
criteria under the five steps below have been met:
|
i) |
identification of the contract with a customer; |
|
ii) |
identification of the performance obligations in the contract; |
|
iii) |
determination of the transaction price; |
|
iv) |
allocation of the transaction price to the separate performance obligations; and |
|
v) |
recognize revenue upon satisfaction of a performance obligation. |
Consulting services generally
include reporting and are typically done monthly, and revenue is matched accordingly. Product sales may include maintenance and customer
support allocated revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of the delivered goods and services based on a selling price
hierarchy using the relative selling price method. All product offering and service offering market values are readily determined based
on current and prior stand-alone sales. The Company defers and recognizes maintenance, updates and support revenue over the term of the
contract period, which is generally one year.
Normal
payment terms offered to customers, distributors and resellers are net 30 days domestically. The Company does not offer payment terms
that extend beyond one year and rarely does it extend payment terms beyond its normal terms. If certain customers do not meet its credit
standards, the Company typically requires payment in advance to limit its credit exposure.
Shipping and handling costs
are billed to the customer and included in revenue. Shipping and handling expenses are included in the cost of revenue. The Company has
elected to account for shipping and handling costs as fulfillment costs after the customer obtains control of the goods.
With the Company’s
newest product, INTRUSION Shield, the Company began offering software on a subscription basis. INTRUSION Shield
is a hosted arrangement subject to software as a service (“SaaS”) guidance under ASC 606. SaaS arrangements are accounted
for as subscription services, not arrangements that transfer a license of intellectual property.
The Company utilizes the
five-step process, mentioned above, per FASB ASC Topic 606 to recognize sales and will follow that directive, also, to define revenue
items as individual and distinct. INTRUSION Shield services provided to its customers for a fixed monthly subscription fee
include:
|
· |
Access to Intrusion’s proprietary software and database to detect and prevent unauthorized access to its clients’ information networks; |
|
· |
Use of all software, associated media, printed materials, data, files, online documentation, and any equipment that Intrusion provides for customers to access the INTRUSION Shield; and |
|
· |
Tech support, post contract customer support (PCS) includes daily program releases or corrections provided by Intrusion without additional charge. |
INTRUSION Shield
contracts provide for no other services, and our customers have no rebates or return rights, nor are any such rights anticipated to be
offered as part of this service.
The Company satisfies its
performance obligation when the INTRUSION Shield solution is available to detect and prevent unauthorized access to a client’s
information networks. Revenue should be recognized monthly over the term of the contract. The Company’s standard initial contract
terms automatically renew unless notice is given 30 days before renewal. Upfront payment of fees is deferred and amortized into income
over the period covered by the contract.
The Company’s accounts
receivable represents unconditional contract billings for sales per contracts with customers and are classified as current. As of March
31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, we had accounts receivable balances of $0.5 million in both periods. We did not recognize an allowance
for doubtful accounts as of March 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, respectively.
The Company classifies our
contract assets as receivables because the Company generally has an unconditional right to payment for our sales or services performed
at the end of the reporting period. As a result, the Company had no material contract assets as of March 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022.
Contract liabilities consist
of cash payments in advance of the Company satisfying performance obligations and recognizing revenue. The Company currently classifies
deferred revenue as a contract liability.
The following table presents
changes in the Company’s contract liability during the period ended March 31, 2023, and the year ended December 31, 2022 (in thousands):
Schedule of contract liability | |
| | |
| |
| |
March 31, 2023 | | |
December 31, 2022 | |
Balance at beginning of period | |
$ | 455 | | |
$ | 560 | |
Additions | |
| 255 | | |
| 1,877 | |
Revenue recognized | |
| (544 | ) | |
| (1,982 | ) |
Balance at end of period | |
$ | 166 | | |
$ | 455 | |
9. |
Capitalized Software Development |
The Company capitalizes internally
developed software using the Agile software development methodology which allows the Company to accurately track, and record costs associated
with new software development and enhancements.
Pursuant to ASC Topic 350-40
Internal Use Software Accounting Capitalization, certain development costs related to the Company’s products during the application
development stage are capitalized as part of property and equipment. Costs incurred in the preliminary stages of development are expensed
as incurred. The preliminary stage includes such activities as conceptual formulation of alternatives, evaluation of alternatives, determination
of existence of needed technology, and the final selection of alternatives. Once the application development stage is reached, internal
and external costs are capitalized until the software is complete and ready for its intended use. Capitalized internal use software is
amortized on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life, which is generally three years.
The Company reports two separate
net loss per share numbers, basic and diluted. Basic net loss attributable to common stockholders per share is computed by dividing net
loss attributable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
net loss attributable to common stockholders per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders for the
period by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period. The common stock
equivalents include all common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, options and vesting of restricted stock awards. The
aggregate number of common stock equivalents excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation for the periods ended March 31,
2023, and 2022 totaled 2,057 and 925 thousand shares, respectively. Since the Company is in a net loss position for the periods ended
March 31, 2023, and 2022, basic and dilutive net loss per share is the same.
11. |
Correction of Immaterial Errors |
During the year ending December 31, 2022, management
identified and corrected certain immaterial errors in the Company’s historical financial statements associated with the cost of
revenues provided by a subcontractor. The errors understated the cost of revenue and overstated the sales and marketing operating expenses
by equal amounts in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The error had no impact on operating losses, net losses, and
net loss per share nor any other financial statement amount. Further these errors had no impact on the consolidated balance sheets, statements
of changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and statement of cash flows. These corrections do not affect any of the metrics used
to calculate and evaluate management’s compensation and had no impact on bonuses, commissions, stock-based compensation, or any
other employee renumeration. Historical amounts have been corrected and are presented on a comparable basis.
The below table presents the effect of the correction
for the period ended March 31, 2022:
Schedule of effect of the correction | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 | |
| |
As Reported | | |
Adjustments | | |
As Corrected | |
Revenue | |
$ | 1,835 | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 1,835 | |
Cost of Revenue | |
| 654 | | |
| 249 | | |
| 903 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Gross Profit | |
| 1,181 | | |
| (249 | ) | |
| 932 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating Expenses | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Sales and marketing | |
| 1,455 | | |
| (249 | ) | |
| 1,206 | |
Research and development | |
| 1,650 | | |
| – | | |
| 1,650 | |
General and administrative | |
| 2,060 | | |
| – | | |
| 2,060 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating Loss | |
$ | (3,984 | ) | |
$ | – | | |
$ | (3,984 | ) |