Item
1. Business.
Forward-Looking
Statements
Certain
statements contained in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties. When used herein, the terms “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “believes,”
and similar expressions as they relate to Kentucky First Federal Bancorp or its management are intended to identify such forward looking
statements. Kentucky First Federal Bancorp’s actual results, performance or achievements may materially differ from those expressed
or implied in the forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that could cause or contribute to such material differences include,
but are not limited to, general economic conditions, prices for real estate in the Company’s market areas, interest rate environment,
competitive conditions in the financial services industry, changes in law, governmental policies and regulations, rapidly changing technology
affecting financial services, the potential effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the local and national economic environment, on our customers
and on our operations (as well as any changes to federal, state and local government laws, regulations and orders in connection with
the pandemic), and the other matters mentioned in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as required by applicable law or
regulation, the Company does not undertake the responsibility, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to release publicly the result
of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statements
or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
General
References
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Kentucky First, and where appropriate,
collectively to Kentucky First, First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky.
Kentucky
First Federal Bancorp. Kentucky First Federal Bancorp (“Kentucky First” or the “Company”) was incorporated
as a mid-tier holding company under the laws of the United States on March 2, 2005 upon the completion of the reorganization of First
Federal Savings and Loan Association of Hazard (“First Federal of Hazard”) into a federal mutual holding company form of
organization (the “Reorganization”). On that date, Kentucky First also completed its minority stock offering and its concurrent
acquisition of Frankfort First Bancorp, Inc. (“Frankfort First Bancorp”) and its wholly owned subsidiary First Federal Savings
Bank of Kentucky, Frankfort, Kentucky (“First Federal of Kentucky”) (the “Merger”). Following the Reorganization
and Merger, the Company has operated First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky (collectively, the “Banks”) as
two independent, community-oriented savings institutions.
On
December 31, 2012, Kentucky First acquired CFK Bancorp, Inc., the savings and loan holding company for Central Kentucky Federal Savings
Bank, a federally chartered savings bank located in Danville, Kentucky. Central Kentucky Federal Savings Bank was merged into First Federal
of Kentucky and now operates as a division of First Federal of Kentucky under the name “Central Kentucky Federal Savings Bank”
through its two offices in Danville, Kentucky and its Lancaster, Kentucky branch. With the acquisition, the Company expanded its customer
base in the central Kentucky area with an institution that shared its community banking orientation and thrift heritage and enjoyed a
favorable reputation within the new Danville-Lancaster market area.
Kentucky
First’s and First Federal of Hazard’s executive offices are located at 655 Main Street, Hazard, Kentucky, 41702 and the telephone
number for investor relations is (888) 818-3372.
At
June 30, 2021, Kentucky First had total assets of $338.1 million, deposits of $226.8 million and stockholders’ equity of $52.3
million. The discussion in this Annual Report on Form 10-K relates primarily to the businesses of First Federal of Hazard and First Federal
of Kentucky, as Kentucky First’s operations consist primarily of operating the Banks and investing funds retained in the Reorganization.
First
Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky are subject to examination and comprehensive regulation by the Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency and their deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund, which is administered by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation. Both of the Banks are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, which is one of the 12 regional
banks in the FHLB System. See “Regulation and Supervision.”
First
Federal Savings and Loan Association of Hazard. First Federal of Hazard was formed as a federally chartered mutual savings and
loan association in 1960. First Federal of Hazard operates from a single office located at 655 Main Street, Hazard, Kentucky as a community-oriented
savings and loan association offering traditional financial services to consumers in Perry and surrounding counties in eastern Kentucky.
It engages primarily in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and using such funds to originate, when available,
loans secured by first mortgages on owner-occupied, residential real estate and occasionally other loans secured by real estate. To the
extent there is insufficient loan demand in its market area, and where appropriate under its investment policies, First Federal of Hazard
has historically invested in mortgage-backed and investment securities, although since the reorganization, First Federal of Hazard has
been purchasing whole loans and participations in loans originated at First Federal of Kentucky. At June 30, 2021, First Federal of Hazard
had total assets of $90.8 million, net loans of $83.7 million, total mortgage-backed and other securities of $145,000, deposits of $48.5
million and total capital of $18.4 million.
First
Federal Savings Bank of Kentucky. First Federal of Kentucky is a federally chartered savings bank, which is primarily engaged
in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and originating primarily adjustable-rate loans secured by first mortgages
on owner-occupied and nonowner-occupied one- to four-family residences in Franklin, Boyle, Garrard and other counties in Kentucky. First
Federal of Kentucky also originates, to a lesser extent, home equity loans and loans secured by churches, multi-family properties, professional
office buildings and other types of property. At June 30, 2021, First Federal of Kentucky had total assets of $249.8 million, net loans
of $214.1 million, total mortgage-backed and other securities of $350,000, deposits of $183.8 million and total capital of $31.2 million.
First
Federal of Kentucky’s main office is located at 216 W. Main Street, Frankfort, Kentucky 40602 and its main telephone number is
(502) 223-1638.
Market
Areas
First
Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky operate in three distinct market areas.
First
Federal of Hazard’s market area consists of Perry County, where the business office is located, as well as the surrounding counties
of Letcher, Knott, Breathitt, Leslie and Clay Counties in eastern Kentucky. The economy in its market area has been distressed in recent
years. The local economy depends on the coal industry and other industries, such as health care and manufacturing. Still, the economy
in First Federal of Hazard’s market area continues to lag behind the economies of Kentucky and the United States. In the most recent
available data, using information from the Commonwealth of Kentucky Economic Development and the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics,
median household income in Perry County averaged $33,640 compared to personal income of $50,589 in Kentucky and $62,843 in the United
States. Total population in Perry County has declined approximately 1,560 or 5.5% over the last four years to approximately 26,000. However,
as a regional economic center, Hazard tends to draw consumers and workers who commute from surrounding counties. Employment in the market
area, particularly in Perry County, consists primarily of education and health services (26.0%), the trade, transportation and utilities
industry (20.3%), professional and business services (7.8%), and financial activities (2.8%). During the last five years, the unemployment
rate (not seasonally adjusted) has been higher than most regions, and in July 2021, was 6.5%, compared to 4.7% in Kentucky and 5.7% in
the United States.
First
Federal of Kentucky’s primary lending area includes the Kentucky counties of Franklin, Boyle, Garrard and surrounding counties,
with the majority of lending originated on properties located in Franklin and Boyle Counties.
Franklin
County has a population of approximately 52,000, of which approximately 27,000 live within the city of Frankfort, which serves as the
capital of Kentucky. The primary employer in the area is government, which employs about 36.3% of the workforce followed by the education
and health services sector (9.9%), followed by the trade, transportation and utilities sector (9.7%), professional and business services
(9.4%), leisure and hospitality industries (8.6%), and manufacturing (8.4%.). The unemployment rate was 4.5% for July 2021 after having
experienced an unemployment rate which had ranged from 4.4% to 9.0% in prior years. The median household income in Franklin County averaged
$56,274.
Boyle
County has a population of approximately 30,000. The education and health services sector, which employs about 21.7% of the work force,
is the largest employer, while the trade, transportation and utilities sector and manufacturing sector are the next largest employers
with approximately 18.6% and 13.3% of the workforce, respectively. Centre College is one of the larger employers in the community. The
unemployment rate was 5.0% in July 2021, while the per capita income in Boyle County for 2019 (the most recent period for which information
is available) averaged $46,382.
Lending
Activities
General.
Our loan portfolio consists primarily of one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. As opportunities arise, we also offer loans
secured by churches, commercial real estate, and multi-family real estate. We also offer loans secured by deposit accounts and, through
First Federal of Kentucky, home equity loans. Substantially all of our loans are made within the Banks’ respective market areas.
Residential
Mortgage Loans. Our primary lending activity is the origination of mortgage loans to enable borrowers to purchase or refinance
existing homes in the Banks’ respective market areas. At June 30, 2021, residential mortgage loans totaled $249.3 million, or 83.2%,
of our total loan portfolio. We offer a mix of adjustable-rate and fixed-rate mortgage loans with terms up to 30 years. Adjustable-rate
loans have an initial fixed term of one, three, five or seven years. After the initial term, the rate adjustments on most of First Federal
of Kentucky’s adjustable-rate loans are indexed to the National Average Contract Interest Rate for Major Lenders on the Purchase
of Previously Occupied Homes. The interest rates on these mortgages are adjusted once a year, with limitations on adjustments generally
of one percentage point per adjustment period, and a lifetime cap of five percentage points. We determine loan fees charged, interest
rates and other provisions of mortgage loans on the basis of our own pricing criteria and competitive market conditions. Some loans originated
by the Banks have an additional advance clause which allows the borrower to obtain additional funds at prevailing interest rates, subject
to managements’ approval.
At
June 30, 2021, the Company’s loan portfolio included $241.9 million in adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans, or 97.0%, of
the Company’s residential mortgage loan portfolio.
The
retention of adjustable-rate loans in the portfolio helps reduce our exposure to increases in prevailing market interest rates. However,
there are unquantifiable credit risks resulting from potential increases in costs to borrowers in the event of upward repricing of adjustable-rate
loans. It is possible that during periods of rising interest rates, the risk of default on adjustable-rate loans may increase due to
increases in interest costs to borrowers. Further, although adjustable-rate loans allow us to increase the sensitivity of our interest-earning
assets to changes in interest rates, the extent of this interest sensitivity is limited by the initial fixed-rate period before the first
adjustment and the periodic and lifetime interest rate adjustment limitations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that yields on
our adjustable-rate loans will fully adjust to compensate for increases in our cost of funds. Finally, adjustable-rate loans may decrease
at a pace faster than decreases in our cost of funds, resulting in reduced net income.
While
one- to four-family residential real estate loans are normally originated with up to 30-year terms, such loans typically remain outstanding
for substantially shorter periods because borrowers often prepay their loans in full upon sale of the mortgaged property or upon refinancing
the original loan. Therefore, average loan maturity is a function of, among other factors, the level of purchase and sale activity in
the real estate market, prevailing interest rates and the interest rates payable on outstanding loans. As interest rates declined and
remained low over the past few years, we have experienced high levels of loan repayments and refinancings.
The
Banks offer various programs for the purchase and refinance of one- to four-family loans. Most of these loans have loan-to-value ratios
of 80% or less, based on an appraisal provided by a state licensed or certified appraiser. For owner-occupied properties, the borrower
may be able to borrow up to 95% of the value if they secure and pay for private mortgage insurance or they may be able to obtain a second
mortgage (at a higher interest rate) in which they borrow up to 90% of the value. The Boards of Directors of the Banks may approve a
loan above the 80% loan-to-value ratio without such enhancements.
Construction
Loans. We originate loans for a term of one year or less to individuals to finance the construction of residential dwellings
for personal use or for use as rental property. On a case-by-case basis we consider construction loans on other than owner-occupied,
residential property. At June 30, 2021, construction loans totaled $5.4 million, or 1.8%, of our total loan portfolio. Our construction
loans generally provide for the payment of interest only during the construction phase, which is usually less than one year. Loans generally
can be made with a maximum loan to value ratio of 80% of the appraised value. Funds are disbursed as progress is made toward completion
of the construction based on site inspections by qualified bank staff.
Construction
financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate.
Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion
of construction or development and the estimated cost (including interest) of construction. During the construction phase, a number of
factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If the estimate of construction costs proves to be inaccurate, we may be required to
advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit completion of the development. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate,
we may be confronted, at or before the maturity of the loan, with a project having a value which is insufficient to assure full repayment.
As a result of the foregoing, construction lending often involves the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in
part, on the success of the ultimate project rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. If
we are forced to foreclose on a project before or at completion due to a default, there can be no assurance that we will be able to recover
the unpaid balance and accrued interest on the loan, as well as related foreclosure and holding costs.
Multi-Family
Loans. We offer mortgage loans secured by multi-family property (residential real estate comprised of five or more units.) At
June 30, 2021, multi-family loans totaled $19.8 million, or 6.6%, of our total loan portfolio. We originate multi-family real estate
loans for terms of generally 25 years or less. Loan amounts generally do not exceed 80% of the appraised value and tend to range much
lower.
Nonresidential
Loans. As opportunities arise, we offer mortgage loans secured by nonresidential real estate, which is generally secured by commercial
office buildings, churches, and properties used for other purposes. At June 30, 2021, nonresidential real estate loans totaled $35.5
million, or 11.9% of our total loan portfolio. We originate nonresidential real estate loans for terms of generally 25 years or less
and loan amounts generally do not exceed 80% of the appraised value and tend to range much lower.
Loans
secured by multi-family and nonresidential real estate generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than one-
to four-family residential mortgage loans. Of primary concern in multi-family and nonresidential real estate lending is the borrower’s
creditworthiness and the feasibility and cash flow potential of the project. Payments on loans secured by income properties often depend
on successful operation and management of the properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater extent than
residential real estate loans to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. To monitor cash flows on income properties,
we require borrowers and/or loan guarantors to provide annual financial statements on larger multi-family and commercial real estate
loans. In reaching a decision on whether to make a multi-family or nonresidential real estate loan, we consider the net cash flow of
the project, the borrower’s expertise, credit history and the value of the underlying property.
Commercial
Non-mortgage Loans. At June 30, 2021, commercial non-mortgage loans totaled $2.3 million, or 0.7%, of our total loan portfolio.
We do not emphasize commercial non-mortgage loans, which may be secured by vehicles used in business or by inventory and equipment of
the business or may be unsecured, although we do originate such loans on a limited basis and generally require a pre-existing relationship
with the Bank. These loans are made only to businesses in our local market and we generally require personal guarantees of well-established
individuals for these loans. Commercial loans involve an even greater degree of risk than real estate loans.
Consumer
Lending. Our consumer loans include home equity lines of credit, loans secured by savings deposits, automobile loans and unsecured
or personal loans. At June 30, 2021, our consumer loan balance totaled $8.9 million, or 3.0%, of our total loan portfolio. Of the consumer
loan balance at June 30, 2021, $7.2 million were home equity loans, $1.1 million were loans secured by savings deposits and $628,000
were automobile or unsecured loans. Our home equity loans are made on the security of residential real estate and have terms of up to
15 years. Most of our home equity loans are second mortgages subordinate only to first mortgages also held by the bank and do not exceed
80% of the estimated value of the property, less the outstanding principal of the first mortgage, although we do offer home equity loans
up to 90% of the value less the balance of the first mortgage at a premium rate to qualified borrowers. These loans are not secured by
private mortgage insurance. Our home equity loans require the monthly payment of 1.0% to 2.0% of the unpaid principal until maturity,
when the remaining unpaid principal, if any, is due. Home equity loans bear variable rates of interest indexed to the prime rate for
loans with 80% or less loan-to-value ratio, and 2% above the prime rate for loans with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 80%. Interest
rates on these loans can be adjusted monthly. At June 30, 2021, the total outstanding home equity loans amounted to 2.4% of the Company’s
total loan portfolio.
Loans
secured by savings are originated for up to 90% of the depositor’s savings account balance. The interest rate is varying percentage
points above the rate paid on the savings account, and the account must be pledged as collateral to secure the loan. At June 30, 2021,
loans on savings accounts totaled 0.4% of the Company’s total loan portfolio.
Consumer
loans generally entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans which are unsecured
or secured by rapidly depreciable assets. Automobile and unsecured loans at June 30, 2021, totaled 0.2% of the Company’s total
loan portfolio.
Loan
Originations, Purchases and Sales. Loan originations come from a number of sources. The primary source of loan originations are
our in-house loan originators, and to a lesser extent, advertising and referrals from customers and real estate agents. First Federal
of Kentucky sells fixed-rate loans with longer maturities to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (“FHLB-Cincinnati”).
We earn income on the loans sold through fees we charge on the origination, interest spread premiums earned when we sell the loans, and
loan servicing fees on an on-going basis, because servicing rights are retained on such loans. At June 30, 2021, $18.3 million in loans
were being serviced by First Federal of Kentucky for the FHLB-Cincinnati.
Loan
Approval Procedures and Authority. Our lending activities follow written, nondiscriminatory, underwriting standards and loan
origination procedures established by each Bank’s Board of Directors and management. Each Bank’s loan committee can approve
or deny loans on one- to four-family properties totaling $500,000 or less. First Federal of Hazard’s loan committee consists of
its two senior officers, while First Federal of Kentucky’s loan approval process allows for various combinations of experienced
bank officers to approve or deny loans which are one- to four-family properties. Loans that do not conform to this criteria must be submitted
to the Board of Directors or Loan Committee composed of at least three directors, for approval.
It
is the Company’s practice to record a lien on the real estate securing a loan. The Banks generally do not require title insurance,
although it may be required for loans made in certain programs. The Banks do require fire and casualty insurance on all security properties
and flood insurance when the collateral property is located in a designated flood hazard area.
Loans
to One Borrower. The maximum amount either Bank may lend to one borrower and the borrower’s related entities is limited,
by regulation, to generally 15% of that Bank’s stated capital and the allowance for loan losses. At June 30, 2021, the regulatory
limit on loans to one borrower was $4.5 million for First Federal of Hazard and $2.8 million for First Federal of Kentucky. Neither of
the banks had lending relationships in excess of their respective lending limits. However, loans or participations in loans may be sold
among the Banks, which may allow a borrower’s total loans with the Company to exceed the limit of either individual bank.
Loan
Commitments. The Banks issue commitments for the funding of mortgage loans. Generally, these commitments exist from the time
the underwriting of the loan is completed and the closing of the loan. Generally, these commitments are for a maximum of 30 or 60 days
but management routinely extends the commitment if circumstances delay the closing. Management reserves the right to verify or re-evaluate
the borrower’s qualifications and to change the rates and terms of the loan at that time.
If
conditions exist whereby either Bank experiences a significant increase in loans outstanding or commits to originate loans that are riskier
than a typical one- to four-family mortgage, management and the boards will consider reflecting the anticipated loss exposure in a separate
liability. As residential loans are approved in the normal course of business, and those loans are underwritten to the standards of the
Banks, management does not believe alteration of the allowance for loan losses is warranted. At June 30, 2021, no commitment losses were
reflected in a separate liability.
Both
Banks offer construction loans that either have a separate construction period of one year or less, approved with a simultaneous commitment
for permanent financing, or a loan that has a construction phase of one year or less that is convertible to permanent financing.
Interest
Rates and Loan Fees. Interest rates charged on mortgage loans are primarily determined by competitive loan rates offered in our
market areas and our yield objectives. Mortgage loan rates reflect factors such as prevailing market interest rate levels, the supply
of money available to the savings industry and the demand for such loans. These factors are in turn affected by general economic conditions,
the monetary policies of the federal government, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the general supply of
money in the economy, tax policies and governmental budget matters.
We
receive fees in connection with late payments on our loans. Depending on the type of loan and the competitive environment for mortgage
loans, we may charge an origination fee on all or some of the loans we originate. We may also offer a menu of loans whereby the borrower
may pay a higher fee to receive a lower rate or to pay a smaller or no fee for a higher rate.
Delinquencies.
When a borrower fails to make a required loan payment, we take a number of steps to have the borrower cure the delinquency and restore
the loan to current status. We make initial contact with the borrower when the loan becomes 15 days past due. Subsequently, bank staff,
under the direct supervision of senior management and with consultation by the Banks’ attorneys, attempt to contact the borrower
and determine their status and plans for resolving the delinquency. However, once a delinquency reaches 90 days, management considers
foreclosure and, if the borrower has not provided a reasonable plan (such as selling the collateral, securing a commitment from another
lender to refinance the loan or submitting a plan to repay the delinquent principal, interest, escrow, and late charges) the foreclosure
suit may be initiated. In some cases, management may delay initiating the foreclosure suit if, in management’s opinion, the Banks’
chance of loss is minimal (such as with loans where the estimated value of the property greatly exceeds the amount of the loan) or if
the original borrower is deceased or incapacitated. If a foreclosure action is initiated and the loan is not brought current, paid in
full, or refinanced with another lender before the foreclosure sale, the real property securing the loan is sold at foreclosure. The
Banks are represented at the foreclosure sale and in most cases will bid an amount equal to the Banks’ investment (including interest,
advances for taxes and insurance, foreclosure costs, and attorney’s fees). If another bidder outbids the Bank, the Bank’s
investment is received in full. If another bidder does not outbid the Banks, the Banks acquire the property and attempt to sell it to
recover their investment.
A
borrower’s filing for bankruptcy can alter the methods available to the Banks to seek collection. In such cases, the Banks work
closely with legal counsel to resolve the delinquency as quickly as possible.
We
may consider loan workout arrangements with certain borrowers under certain conditions. Management of each bank provides a report to
its board of directors on a monthly basis of all loans more than 60 days delinquent, including loans in foreclosure, and all property
acquired through foreclosure.
Investment
Activities
We
have legal authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various federal
agencies and state and municipal governments, mortgage-backed securities and certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions.
We also are required to maintain an investment in FHLB-Cincinnati stock, the level of which is largely dependent on our level of borrowings
from the FHLB.
At
June 30, 2021, our investment portfolio consisted of mortgage-backed securities issued and guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and
Ginnie Mae with stated final maturities of 30 years or less. The Company held no equity position with Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Our
investment objectives are to provide an alternate source of low-risk investments when loan demand is insufficient, to provide and maintain
liquidity, to maintain a balance of high quality, diversified investments to minimize risk, to provide collateral for pledging requirements,
to establish an acceptable level of interest rate risk, and to generate a favorable return. The Banks’ Board of Directors has the
overall responsibility for each institution’s investment portfolio, including approval of investment policies. The management
of each Bank may authorize investments as prescribed in each of the Bank’s investment policies.
Bank
Owned Life Insurance
First
Federal of Kentucky owns several Bank Owned Life Insurance policies totaling $2.7 million at June 30, 2021. The purpose of these policies
is to offset future escalation of the costs of non-salary employee benefit plans such as First Federal of Kentucky’s defined benefit
retirement plan and First Federal of Kentucky’s health insurance plan. The lives of certain key Bank employees are insured, and
First Federal of Kentucky is the sole beneficiary and will receive any benefits upon the employee’s death. The policies were purchased
from four highly-rated life insurance companies. The design of the plan allows for the cash value of the policy to be designated as an
asset of First Federal of Kentucky. The asset’s value will increase by the crediting rate, which is a rate set by each insurance
company and is subject to change on an annual basis. The growth of the value of the asset will be recorded as other operating income.
Management does not foresee any expense associated with the plan. Because this is a life insurance product, current federal tax laws
exempt the income from federal income taxes.
Bank
owned life insurance is not secured by any government agency nor are the policies’ asset values or death benefits secured specifically
by tangible property. Great care was taken in selecting the insurance companies, and the bond ratings and financial condition of these
companies are monitored on a quarterly basis. The failure of one of these companies could result in a significant loss to First Federal
of Kentucky. Other risks include the possibility that the favorable tax treatment of the income could change, that the crediting rate
will not be increased in a manner comparable to market interest rates, or that this type of plan will no longer be permitted by First
Federal of Kentucky’s regulators. This asset is considered illiquid because, although First Federal of Kentucky may terminate the
policies and receive the original premium plus all earnings, such an action would require the payment of federal income taxes on all
earnings since the policies’ inception.
Deposit
Activities and Other Sources of Funds
General.
Deposits, loan repayments and maturities, redemptions, sales and repayments of investment and mortgage-backed securities are the
major sources of our funds for lending and other investment purposes. Loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while
deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general interest rates and money market conditions.
Deposit
Accounts. The vast majority of our depositors are residents of the Banks’ respective market areas. Deposits are attracted
from within our market areas through the offering of passbook savings and certificate accounts, and, at First Federal of Kentucky, checking
accounts and individual retirement accounts (“IRAs”). We do not utilize brokered funds. Deposit account terms vary according
to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining
the terms of our deposit accounts, we consider the rates offered by our competition, profitability to us, asset liability management
and customer preferences and concerns. We review our deposit mix and pricing on an ongoing basis as needed.
Borrowings.
First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky borrow from the FHLB-Cincinnati to supplement their supplies of investable
funds and to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. The Federal Home Loan Bank functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for
member financial institutions. As members, each Bank is required to own capital stock in the FHLB-Cincinnati and is authorized to apply
for advances on the security of such stock and certain of our mortgage loans and other assets (principally securities which are obligations
of, or guaranteed by, the United States), provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made under
several different programs, each having its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount
of advances are based either on a fixed percentage of an institution’s net worth or on the Federal Home Loan Bank’s assessment
of the institution’s creditworthiness.
Subsidiary
Activities
The
Company has no other wholly owned subsidiaries other than First Federal of Hazard and Frankfort First Bancorp. Frankfort First Bancorp
has one subsidiary, First Federal of Kentucky.
As
federally chartered savings institutions, the Banks are permitted to invest an amount equal to 2% of assets in subsidiaries, with an
additional investment of 1% of assets where such investment serves primarily community, inner-city and community-development purposes.
Under such limitations, as of June 30, 2021, First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky were authorized to invest up to $2.7
million and $7.5 million, respectively, in the stock of or loans to subsidiaries, including the additional 1% investment for community,
inner-city and community development purposes.
Competition
We
face significant competition for the attraction of deposits and origination of loans. Our most direct competition for deposits has historically
come from the banks and credit unions operating in our market areas and, to a lesser extent, from other financial services companies,
such as investment brokerage firms. We also face competition for depositors’ funds from money market funds and other corporate
and government securities. Several of our competitors are significantly larger than us and, therefore, have significantly greater resources.
We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend
of consolidation in the financial services industry. Technological advances, for example, have lowered the barriers to enter new market
areas, allowed banks to expand their geographic reach by providing services over the Internet and made it possible for non-depository
institutions to offer products and services that traditionally have been provided by banks. Changes in federal law permit affiliation
among banks, securities firms and insurance companies, which promotes a competitive environment in the financial services industry. Competition
for deposits and the origination of loans could limit our growth in the future.
According
to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), at June 30, 2021, the latest date for which data is available, First
Federal of Hazard had a deposit market share of 7.5% in Perry County. Its largest competitors, Hazard Bancorp (Peoples Bank & Trust
Company of Hazard,) 1st Trust Bank, Inc., and Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (Community Trust Bank, Inc.) had Perry County
deposit market shares of 36.8%, 26.1% and 27.2%, respectively. First Federal of Hazard’s competition for loans comes primarily
from financial institutions in its market area and, to a lesser extent, from other financial services providers, such as mortgage companies
and mortgage brokers. Competition for loans also comes from the increasing number of non-depository financial services companies entering
the mortgage market, such as insurance companies, securities companies and specialty finance companies.
First
Federal of Kentucky’s principal competitors for deposits in its market area are other banking institutions, such as commercial
banks and credit unions, as well as mutual funds and other investments. First Federal of Kentucky principally competes for deposits
by offering a variety of deposit accounts, convenient business hours and branch locations, customer service and a well-trained
staff. According to the FDIC, at June 30, 2021, First Federal of Kentucky had deposit market share of 8.5%, 7.6% and 17.5% for the
Kentucky counties of Franklin, Boyle and Garrard. Its largest competitors for depositors are the Boyle Bancorp, Inc. (The Farmers
National Bank of Danville) at 23.2%, Wesbanco Bank, Inc. (Wesbanco) at 18.1% and Community Trust Bancorp, Inc., (Community Trust
Bank) at 6.9% market share in the three-county area. Wesbanco Bank, Inc., Boyle Bancorp, Inc., and Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. had
assets at June 30, 2021, of $17.0 billion, $791.2 million and $5.5 billion, respectively. The Bank also faces considerable
competition from credit unions including the Commonwealth Credit Union ($1.7 billion in assets) and the Kentucky Employees Credit
Union ($92.0 million in assets). First Federal of Kentucky competes for loans with other depository institutions, as well as
specialty mortgage lenders and brokers and consumer finance companies. First Federal of Kentucky principally competes for loans on
the basis of interest rates and the loan fees it charges, the types of loans it originates and the convenience and service it
provides to borrowers. In addition, First Federal of Kentucky believes it has developed strong relationships with the businesses,
real estate agents, builders and general public in its market area.
Personnel
At
June 31, 2021, we had 59 full-time employees and three part-time employees, none of whom was represented by a collective bargaining unit.
We believe our relationship with our employees is good.
Regulation
and Supervision
General.
First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky are subject to extensive regulation, examination and supervision by the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), as their primary federal regulator, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC),
as insurer of deposits. First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky are each members of the Federal Home Loan Bank System and
their deposit accounts are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) of the FDIC. First Federal of Hazard and
First Federal of Kentucky must each file reports with the OCC and the FDIC concerning their activities and financial condition in addition
to obtaining regulatory approvals before entering into certain transactions such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other financial
institutions. There are periodic examinations by the OCC and, under certain circumstances, the FDIC to evaluate First Federal of Hazard’s
and First Federal of Kentucky’s safety and soundness and compliance with various regulatory requirements. The Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board), the agency that regulates and supervises bank and savings and loan holding companies,
supervises and regulates Kentucky First and First Federal MHC. Kentucky First and First Federal MHC, as savings and loan holding companies,
are required to file certain reports with, and are subject to examination by, and otherwise are required to comply with the rules and
regulations of the Federal Reserve Board. This regulatory structure is intended primarily for the protection of the DIF and depositors.
The
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act) significantly changed the financial regulatory regime
in the United States. Since the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, U.S. banks and financial services firms have been subject to enhanced
regulation and oversight. Several provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act remain subject to further rulemaking, guidance, and interpretation
by the federal banking agencies.
Enacted
in 2018, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 (EGRRCPA) amended certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank
Act. EGRRCPA provides limited regulatory relief to certain financial institutions, while preserving the existing framework under which
U.S. financial institutions are regulated. In addition to amending the Dodd-Frank Act, EGRRCPA also includes several provisions that
positively affect smaller banking institutions (e.g., those with less than $10 billion in assets) like the Banks. Specific provisions
of the EGRRCPA that benefit smaller banks include modifications to the “qualified mortgage” criteria under the “ability
to repay” rules for certain mortgages that are held and maintained on the Bank’s retained portfolio as well as relief from
certain capital requirements with the creation of a “community bank leverage ratio.” See “Federal Savings Association
Regulation – Capital Requirements.”
Certain
of the regulatory requirements that are applicable to First Federal of Hazard, First Federal of Kentucky, Kentucky First and First Federal
MHC are described below. This discussion does not purport to be a complete description of the laws and regulations involved, and is qualified
in its entirety by the actual laws and regulations. Moreover, laws and regulations are subject to changes by the U.S. Congress or the
regulatory agencies as applicable.
Regulation
of Federal Savings Associations
Business
Activities. Federal law and regulations, primarily the Home Owners’ Loan Act and the regulations of the OCC, govern the
activities of federal savings associations, such as First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky. These laws and regulations
delineate the nature and extent of the activities in which federal savings associations may engage. In particular, certain lending authority
for federal savings associations (e.g., commercial, nonresidential real property loans and consumer loans) is limited to a specified
percentage of the association’s capital or assets.
Branching.
Federal savings associations are authorized to establish branch offices in any state or states of the United States and its territories,
subject to the approval of the OCC.
Capital
Requirements. Federal regulations require insured depository institutions, including federal savings associations to meet four
minimum capital standards: a 4.0% Tier 1 leverage ratio; a 4.5% common equity Tier 1 ratio; a 6.0% Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
ratio; and an 8% Total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio. These requirements were effective January 1, 2015, and are the result of
a final rule implementing recommendations of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel III) and certain requirements of the Dodd
Frank Act. The regulations also include a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% above the regulatory minimum capital requirements,
which must consist entirely of common equity Tier 1 capital and result in the following minimum ratios: (1) a common equity Tier 1 capital
ratio of 7.0%, (2) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%, and (3) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. The capital conservation buffer requirement
was phased in beginning in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and increased by that amount each year until fully implemented
in January 2019. An institution will be subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases and paying discretionary
bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount.
Tier
1 capital is generally defined as common stockholders’ equity (including retained earnings), certain non-cumulative perpetual preferred
stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles other than certain
mortgage servicing rights and credit card relationships. The regulations eliminate the inclusion of certain instruments, such as trust
preferred securities, from Tier 1 capital. Instruments issued before May 19, 2010, are grandfathered for companies with consolidated
assets of $15 billion or less. The components of Tier 2 capital currently include cumulative preferred stock, long-term perpetual preferred
stock, mandatory convertible securities, subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock, the allowance for loan and lease losses
limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and up to 45% of unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with
readily determinable fair market values. Overall, the amount of Tier 2 capital included as part of total capital cannot exceed 100% of
core capital. Total capital is defined as core capital and supplementary capital, less certain specified deductions from total capital
such as reciprocal holdings of depository institution capital, instruments and equity investments. For purposes of determining the amount
of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets, recourse obligations, residual interests and direct
credit substitutes, are multiplied by a risk-weight factor of 0% to 150%, as assigned by the capital regulation based on the risks believed
inherent in the type of asset.
The
EGRRCPA required the federal banking agencies, including the OCC, to establish a “community bank leverage ratio” (CBLR) for
qualifying community banking organizations having less than $10 billion in average total consolidated assets and a leverage ratio of
greater than 9%. The CBLR is an alternative framework that permits qualifying institutions to calculate a leverage ratio to measure capital
adequacy. Institutions opting into the CBLR framework are not be required to calculate or report risk-based capital and are deemed to
have met the “well capitalized” ratio requirements and be in compliance with the generally applicable capital rule if they
meet the CBLR ratio. The CBLR ratio is the ratio of a banking organization’s Tier 1 capital to its average total consolidated assets
as reported on the banking organization’s applicable regulatory filings. The federal agencies a final rule, effective January 1,
2020, that set the CBLR at 9%. The CARES Act directed the federal banking agencies to issue an interim rule temporarily lowering the
CBLR ratio to 8% which the agencies did with a transition back to 9% by year-ended 2021. The Banks elected to use the CBLR framework
effective for the quarter ended March 31, 2020. As of June 30, 2021, the capital levels of First Federal of Hazard and First Federal
of Kentucky exceed the minimum required capital amounts for capital adequacy. See Note K-Stockholders’ Equity and Regulatory Capital
in notes to financial statements.
Prompt
Corrective Regulatory Action. Federal law requires the federal banking agencies to take “prompt corrective action”
should an insured depository institution fail to meet certain capital adequacy standards. Prompt corrective action regulations provide
five capital classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically
undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval
is required to accept broker deposits. The OCC is required to take certain supervisory actions against undercapitalized federal savings
associations, the severity of which depends upon the association’s degree of undercapitalization. In addition, numerous mandatory
supervisory actions become immediately applicable to an undercapitalized association, including, but not limited to, increased monitoring
by regulators and restrictions on growth, capital distributions and expansion. The OCC could also take any one of a number of discretionary
supervisory actions, including the issuance of a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors. Significantly
and undercapitalized associations are subject to additional mandatory and discretionary measures.
Loans
to One Borrower. Federal law provides that federal savings associations are generally subject to the limits on loans to one borrower
applicable to national banks. Subject to certain exceptions, a federal savings association may not make a loan or extend credit to a
single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of its unimpaired capital and surplus. An additional amount may be lent, equal
to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if secured by specified readily-marketable collateral.
Standards
for Safety and Soundness. As required by statute, the federal banking agencies have adopted Interagency Guidelines prescribing
Standards for Safety and Soundness. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use
to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the OCC determines that a federal
savings association fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the OCC may require the institution to submit an acceptable
plan to achieve compliance with the standard.
Limitation
on Capital Distributions. OCC regulations impose limitations upon all capital distributions by a federal savings association,
including cash dividends, payments to repurchase its shares and payments to shareholders of another institution in a cash-out merger.
Under the regulations, an application to and the prior approval of the OCC is required before any capital distribution if, among other
circumstances the association will not remain an “eligible” savings association (i.e., generally, well capitalized
and with examination and Community Reinvestment Act ratings in the two top categories), the total capital distributions for the calendar
year exceed net income for that year plus the amount of retained net income for the preceding two years, Federal savings association
is directly or indirectly controlled by a mutual savings and loan holding company or the distribution would otherwise be contrary to
a statute, regulation or agreement with the. In addition, the federal savings association must provide 30 days prior notice to the Federal
Reserve Board of the capital distribution if, like First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky, it is a subsidiary of a holding
company. If First Federal of Hazard’s or First Federal of Kentucky’s capital were ever to fall below its regulatory requirements
or the OCC notified it that it was in need of increased supervision, its ability to make capital distributions could be restricted. In
addition, the OCC could prohibit a proposed capital distribution that would otherwise be permitted by the regulation, if the agency determines
that such distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.
Qualified
Thrift Lender Test. Federal law requires federal savings associations to meet a qualified thrift lender test. Under the test,
a federal savings association is required to either qualify as a “domestic building and loan association” under the Internal
Revenue Code or maintain at least 65% of its “portfolio assets” (total assets less: (i) specified liquid assets up to 20%
of total assets; (ii) intangibles, including goodwill; and (iii) the value of property used to conduct business) in certain “qualified
thrift investments” (primarily residential mortgages and related investments, including certain mortgage-backed securities, education
loans, credit card loans and small business loans) in at least 9 months out of each 12-month period.
A
savings association that fails the qualified thrift lender test is immediately subject to certain operating restrictions, including restrictions
on new activities, branching and the payment of dividends. The Dodd-Frank Act also specifies that failing the qualified thrift lender
test is a violation of law that could result in an enforcement action. Failure to correct the violation within 12 months will cause the
association’s savings and loan holding company to register as and be deemed a bank holding company. At June 30, 2021, First Federal
of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky were in compliance with the qualified thrift lender test in each of the prior 12 months.
Transactions
with Related Parties. Federal law limits the authority of First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky to lend to, and
engage in certain other transactions (collectively, “covered transactions”), with “affiliates” (e.g.,
any company that controls or is under common control with an insured depository institution, including Kentucky First, First Federal
MHC and their non-savings institution subsidiaries). The aggregate amount of covered transactions with any individual affiliate is limited
to 10% of the capital and surplus of the savings association. The aggregate amount of covered transactions with all affiliates is limited
to 20% of the savings association’s capital and surplus. Loans and other specified transactions with affiliates are required to
be secured by collateral in an amount and of a type described in federal law. The purchase of low-quality assets from affiliates is generally
prohibited. Transactions with affiliates must be on terms and under circumstances that are at least as favorable to the association as
those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated companies. In addition, savings associations are prohibited
from lending to any affiliate that is engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and no federal savings
association may purchase the securities of any affiliate other than a subsidiary. Transactions between sister depository institutions
that are 80% or more owned by the same holding company are exempt from the quantitative limits and collateral requirements.
The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 generally prohibits a company from making loans to its executive officers and directors. However, that law
contains a specific exception for loans by a depository institution to its executive officers and directors in compliance with federal
banking laws. Under such laws, First Federal of Hazard’s and First Federal of Kentucky’s authority to extend credit to executive
officers, directors and 10% shareholders (“insiders”), as well as entities such persons control, is limited. The law restricts
both the individual and aggregate amount of loans First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky may make to insiders based, in
part, on First Federal of Hazard’s and First Federal of Kentucky’s respective capital positions and requires certain board
approval procedures to be followed. Such loans must be made on terms, including rates and collateral, substantially the same as, and
follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated
persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or any other unfavorable features. There are additional restrictions
applicable to loans to executive officers.
Enforcement.
The OCC has primary enforcement responsibility over federal savings associations and has the authority to bring actions against
the institution and all institution-affiliated parties, including stockholders, and any attorneys, appraisers and accountants who knowingly
or recklessly participate in wrongful action likely to have an adverse effect on an insured institution. Formal enforcement actions may
range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and desist order to removal of officers and/or directors to appointment of a
receiver or conservator or termination of deposit insurance. Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and can amount to $25,000
per day, or even $1 million per day in especially egregious cases. The FDIC has authority to recommend to the OCC that enforcement action
to be taken with respect to a particular savings association. If action is not taken by the OCC, the FDIC has authority to take such
action under certain circumstances. Federal law also establishes criminal penalties for certain violations of law.
Assessments.
Federal savings associations pay assessments to the OCC to fund its operations. The general assessments, paid on a semi-annual
basis, are based upon the savings association’s total assets, including consolidated subsidiaries, its financial condition and
the complexity of its portfolio.
Insurance
of Deposit Accounts. The deposits of both First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky are insured up to applicable
limits by the DIF administered by the FDIC. Deposit insurance per account owner is currently $250,000. Under the FDIC’s risk-based
assessment system, insured depository are assigned a risk category based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels and certain
other factors. An institution’s assessment rate depends upon the category to which it is assigned, and certain adjustments specified
by FDIC regulations. Institutions deemed less risky pay lower assessments. The FDIC may adjust the scale uniformly, except that no adjustment
can deviate more than two basis points from the base scale without notice and comment. No institution may pay a dividend if in default
of the federal deposit insurance assessment. Assessment rates currently range from 1.5 to 30 basis points of total average assets (excluding
PPP loans) less average tangible equity.
The
FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments. A significant increase in insurance premiums would likely have an adverse effect
on the operating expenses and results of operations of the Banks. Management cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in
the future.
Federal
Home Loan Bank System. First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank System,
which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides a central credit facility primarily for member
institutions. As members of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky are each
required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in that Federal Home Loan Bank. First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky
were in compliance with this requirement with investments in Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati stock at June 30, 2021, of $2.0 million
and $4.5 million, respectively.
Reserve
Requirements. Federal Reserve Board regulations require insured depository institutions to maintain non-interest earning reserves
against their transaction accounts (primary interest-bearing and regular checking accounts). Required reserves must be in the form of
vault cash and if vault cash does not fully satisfy the required reserves, requirements may be satisfied in the form of a balance maintained
with the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank. The Federal Reserve Board generally makes annual adjustments to the tiered cash reserve requirements,
however, effective March 26, 2020, the reserve requirement was set to zero for all depository institutions.
Community
Reinvestment Act. All insured depository institutions, including federal savings associations have a continuing and affirmative
obligation consistent with safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of their entire community, including low and moderate
income neighborhoods. The Community Reinvestment Act does not establish specific lending requirements or programs, nor does it limit
an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community
consistent with the Community Reinvestment Act. The Community Reinvestment Act requires the OCC, in connection with its examination of
a savings association, to assess the association’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record
into account in its evaluation of certain applications made by such association, including applications for mergers and acquisitions,
and applications to open, relocate or close a branch or facility.
The
Community Reinvestment Act requires public disclosure of an institution’s rating and requires the OCC to provide a written evaluation
of an institution’s Community Reinvestment Act performance utilizing a four-tiered descriptive rating system. First Federal of
Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky each received a “Satisfactory” rating as a result of their most recent Community Reinvestment
Act assessments.
Holding
Company Regulation
General.
Kentucky First and First Federal MHC are savings and loan holding companies within the meaning of federal law. As such, they
are registered with the Federal Reserve Board and are subject to Federal Reserve Board regulations, examinations, supervision, reporting
requirements and regulations concerning corporate governance and activities. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has enforcement authority
over Kentucky First and First Federal MHC and their non-savings association subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits
the Federal Reserve Board to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to First Federal of Hazard and/or
First Federal of Kentucky.
Restrictions
Applicable to Mutual Holding Companies. Federal law and Federal Reserve Board regulations, limit the activities of a mutual holding
company, such as First Federal MHC, to the following: (1) investing in the stock of insured savings association and acquiring them by
means of a merger or acquisition; (2) investing in a corporation the capital stock of which may be lawfully purchased by a savings association
under federal law; (3) furnishing or performing management services for a savings association subsidiary of a savings and loan holding
company; (4) conducting an insurance agency or escrow business; (5) holding, managing or liquidating assets owned or acquired from
a savings association subsidiary of the savings and loan holding company; (6) holding or managing properties used or occupied by a savings
association subsidiary of the savings and loan holding company; (7) acting as trustee under deed of trust; (8) any activity permitted
for multiple savings and loan holding companies by Federal Reserve Board regulations and; (9) any activity permitted by the Federal Reserve
Board for bank holding companies and financial holding companies
Federal
law prohibits a savings and loan holding company, including a federal mutual holding company, from directly or indirectly, or through
one or more subsidiaries, acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of another savings association, or its holding company, without
prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Board. Federal law also prohibits a savings and loan holding company from acquiring or
retaining control of a depository institution that is not insured by the FDIC. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire
savings associations, the Federal Reserve Board must consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the company
and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the insurance funds, the convenience and needs of the community
and competitive factors.
The
Federal Reserve Board is prohibited from approving any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling
savings associations in more than one state, except: (1) the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan
holding companies, and (2) the acquisition of a savings institution in another state if the laws of the state of the target savings
association specifically permit such acquisitions. The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate savings and loan holding
company acquisitions.
Capital
Requirements. Savings and loan holding companies are generally subject to consolidated capital requirements. The Federal Reserve
Board has provided a “Small Bank Holding Company” exception to its consolidated capital requirements, and EGRRCP directed
the Federal Reserve Board to increase the asset threshold for the exception to $3.0 billion, which was done in 2018. Consequently, savings
and loan holding companies of less than $3.0 billion of assets, such as First Federal, MHC and Kentucky First, are exempt from consolidated
capital requirements unless otherwise directed by the Federal Reserve Board in individual.
Source
of Strength. Federal Reserve Board regulations require savings and loan holding companies to act as a source of financial and
managerial strength to their subsidiary savings associations. The Dodd-Frank Act codified the requirement that savings and loan holding
companies act as a source of financial strength to their insured depository institution subsidiaries. As a result, savings and loan holding
companies are expected to commit resources to support subsidiary savings associations, including at times when the savings and loan holding
company may not be in a financial position to provide such resources.
Dividends.
The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, which expressed
the Federal Reserve Board’s view that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that the company’s
net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earning retention that is consistent with the
company’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Federal Reserve Board also indicated that it would
be inappropriate for a company experiencing serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends. Furthermore, under the prompt
correction action regulations, the Federal Reserve Board may prohibit a bank holding company from paying any dividends if the holding
company’s insured depository institution subsidiary is classified as “undercapitalized.” See “Federal Savings
Association Regulation – Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action.”
Stock
Holding Company Subsidiary Regulation. Federal Reserve Board regulations govern the two-tier mutual holding company form of organization
and subsidiary stock holding companies that are controlled by mutual holding companies. Kentucky First is the stock holding company subsidiary
of First Federal MHC. Kentucky First is only permitted to engage in activities that are permitted for First Federal MHC subject to the
same restrictions and conditions.
Waivers
of Dividends by First Federal MHC. Federal Reserve Board regulations require First Federal MHC to notify the Federal Reserve
Board if it proposes to waive the right to receive dividends declared by Kentucky First. The Dodd-Frank Act specified that dividends
may be waived if certain conditions are met, including that the Federal Reserve Board does not object after being given written notice
of the dividend and proposed waiver. The Federal Reserve Board may not object to such a waiver (i) if the mutual holding company involved
has, prior to December 1, 2009, reorganized into a mutual holding company structure, engaged in a minority stock offering and waived
dividends it had a right to receive; (ii) the board of directors of the mutual holding company expressly determines that a waiver of
the dividend is consistent with its fiduciary duties to members and (iii) the waiver would not be detrimental to the safe and sound operation
of the savings association subsidiaries of the holding company. Beginning with the dividend paid in September 2012, First Federal MHC
has annually sought member approval to obtain Federal Reserve Board approval to waive the MHC’s dividends from the Company. This
effort has been successful each year, including an approval in 2021, which will cover quarterly dividends of $0.10 per common share through
May 2022. It is expected that First Federal MHC will continue to waive future dividends, except to the extent dividends are needed to
fund First Federal MHC’s continuing operations, subject to the ability of First Federal MHC to obtain regulatory approval of its
requests to waive dividends and to its ability to obtain member approval of dividend waivers. For more information, see Item 1A, “Risk
Factors – Our ability to pay dividends is subject to the ability of First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky to make
capital distributions to Kentucky First and the waiver of dividends by First Federal MHC.”
Conversion
of First Federal MHC to Stock Form. Federal Reserve Board regulations permit First Federal MHC to convert from the mutual form
of organization to the capital stock form of organization. In a conversion transaction, a new holding company would be formed as successor
to First Federal MHC, its corporate existence would end, and certain depositors would receive the right to subscribe for additional shares
of the new holding company. In a conversion transaction, each share of common stock held by stockholders other than First Federal MHC
would be automatically converted into a number of shares of common stock of the new holding company based on an exchange ratio determined
at the time of conversion that ensures that stockholders other than First Federal MHC own the same percentage of common stock in the
new holding company as they owned in us immediately before conversion. Under Federal Reserve Board regulations, stockholders other than
First Federal MHC would not be diluted because of any dividends waived by First Federal MHC (and waived dividends would not be considered
in determining an appropriate exchange ratio, provided that the mutual holding company involved was formed, engaged in a minority offering
and waived dividends prior to December 1, 2009), in the event First Federal MHC converts to stock form. First Federal MHC was formed,
engaged in a minority stock offering and waived dividends prior to December 1, 2009. The total number of shares held by stockholders
other than First Federal MHC after a conversion transaction also would be increased by any purchases by stockholders other than First
Federal MHC in the stock offering conducted as part of the conversion transaction.
Acquisition
of Control. Under the federal Change in Bank Control Act, a notice must be submitted to the Federal Reserve Board if any person
(including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire “control” of a savings and loan holding company or savings
association. An acquisition of “control” can occur upon the acquisition of 10% or more of the voting stock of a savings and
loan holding company or savings association or as otherwise defined by the Federal Reserve Board. Under the Change in Bank Control Act,
the Federal Reserve Board has 60 days from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including
the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer and the anti-trust effects of the acquisition. Any company that so acquires control
would then be subject to regulation as a savings and loan holding company.
Future
Legislation. Federal and state legislatures may introduce legislation that will impact the financial services industry. In addition,
federal banking agencies may introduce regulatory initiatives that are likely to impact the financial services industry, generally. Such
initiatives may include proposals to expand or contract the powers of savings and loan holding companies and/or depository institutions
or proposals to substantially change the financial institution regulatory system. Such legislation could change banking statutes and
the operating environment of the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. If enacted, such legislation could increase or decrease
the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities, or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations,
credit unions, and other financial institutions. The Company cannot predict whether any such legislation will be enacted, or, if enacted,
the effect that it or any implementing regulations would have on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. A change
in statutes, regulations, or regulatory policies applicable to Kentucky First or any of its subsidiaries could have a material effect
on the business of the Company.
Federal
and State Taxation
General.
We report our income on a fiscal year basis using the cash method of accounting. See Note H-Federal Income Taxes in the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the change in accounting method available through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Federal
Taxation. The federal income tax laws apply to us in the same manner as to other corporations with some exceptions, including
particularly the reserve for bad debts discussed below. The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as a summary and does
not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to us. Our federal income tax returns are subject to examination
for years 2017 and later. The federal statutory tax rate was 21% for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.
On
December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted, which amended the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, reducing tax rates and
modifying certain policies, credits, and deductions for individuals and businesses. Included in this legislation was a reduction of the
federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act also added limitations on the deductibility of business
interest expense. While this limitation should not impact the deductibility of the Company’s interest expense, the limitation could
impact our commercial borrowers. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act also includes changes to personal income taxes, including: (i) a lower
limit on the deductibility of mortgage interest on single-family residential mortgages; (ii) the elimination of interest deductions for
home equity loans; and (iii) a limitation on the deductibility of property taxes and state and local income taxes.
For
fiscal years beginning before June 30, 1996, thrift institutions that qualified under certain definitional tests and other conditions
of the Internal Revenue Code were permitted to use certain favorable provisions to calculate their deductions from taxable income for
annual additions to their bad debt reserve. A reserve could be established for bad debts on qualifying real property loans, generally
secured by interests in real property improved or to be improved, under the percentage of taxable income method or the experience method.
The reserve for nonqualifying loans was computed using the experience method. Federal legislation enacted in 1996 repealed the reserve
method of accounting for bad debts and the percentage of taxable income method for tax years beginning after 1995 and require savings
institutions to recapture or take into income certain portions of their accumulated bad debt reserves. First Federal of Hazard did not
qualify for such favorable tax treatment for any years through 1996. Approximately $5.2 million of First Federal of Kentucky First’s
accumulated bad debt reserves would not be recaptured into taxable income unless Frankfort First makes a “non-dividend distribution”
to Kentucky First as described below. If First Federal of Hazard or First Federal of Kentucky makes “non-dividend distributions”
to us, the distributions will be considered to have been made from First Federal of Hazard’s and First Federal of Kentucky’s
unrecaptured tax bad debt reserves, including the balance of their reserves as of December 31, 1987, to the extent of the “non-dividend
distributions,” and then from First Federal of Kentucky’s supplemental reserve for losses on loans, to the extent of those
reserves, and an amount based on the amount distributed, but not more than the amount of those reserves, will be included in First Federal
of Kentucky’s taxable income. Non-dividend distributions include distributions in excess of First Federal of Kentucky’s current
and accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for federal income tax purposes, distributions in redemption of stock, and distributions
in partial or complete liquidation. Dividends paid out of First Federal of Kentucky’s current or accumulated earnings and profits
will not be so included in First Federal of Kentucky’s taxable income.
The
amount of additional taxable income triggered by a non-dividend distribution is an amount that, when reduced by the tax attributable
to the income, is equal to the amount of the distribution. Therefore, if First Federal of Kentucky makes a non-dividend distribution
to us, approximately one and one-half times the amount of the distribution not in excess of the amount of the reserves would be includable
in income for federal income tax purposes, assuming a 21% federal corporate income tax rate. First Federal of Kentucky does not intend
to pay dividends in the future that would result in a recapture of any portion of its bad debt reserves.
State
Taxation. Although First Federal MHC and Kentucky First are subject to the Kentucky corporation income tax and state corporation
license tax (franchise tax), the corporation license tax is repealed effective for tax periods ending on or after December 31, 2005.
Gross income of corporations subject to Kentucky income tax is similar to income reported for federal income tax purposes except that
dividend income, among other income items, is exempt from taxation. For First Federal MHC and Kentucky First tax years beginning July
1, 2005, the corporations are subject to an alternative minimum income tax. Corporations must pay the greater of the income tax, the
alternative tax or $175. The corporations can choose between two methods to calculate the alternative minimum; 9.5 cents per $100 of
the corporation’s gross receipts, or 75 cents per $100 of the corporation’s Kentucky gross profits. Kentucky gross profits
means Kentucky gross receipts reduced by returns and allowances attributable to Kentucky gross receipts, less Kentucky cost of goods
sold. The corporations, in their capacity as holding companies for financial institutions, do not have a material amount of cost of goods
sold. Although the corporate license tax rate is 0.21% of total capital employed in Kentucky, a bank holding company, as defined in Kentucky
Revised Statutes 287.900, is allowed to deduct from its taxable capital, the book value of its investment in the stock or securities
of subsidiaries that are subject to the bank franchise tax.
First
Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky are exempt from both the Kentucky corporation income tax and corporation license tax.
However, both institutions are instead subject to the Savings and loan tax, an annual tax imposed on federally or state-chartered savings
and loan associations, savings banks and other similar institutions operating in Kentucky. The tax is 0.1% of taxable capital stock held
as of January 1 each year. Taxable capital stock includes an institution’s undivided profits, surplus and general reserves
plus savings accounts and paid-up stock less deductible items. Deductible items include certain exempt federal obligations and Kentucky
municipal bonds. Financial institutions which are subject to tax both within and without Kentucky must apportion their net capital.
On
March 26, 2019, HB 354 was enacted which sunsets the Savings and Loan Tax after 2020 and subjects financial institutions to the corporate
income tax beginning January 1, 2021. Effective January 1, 2021, the Savings and Loan Tax no longer applies to financial institutions.
Item
1A. Risk Factors.
Interest
Rate Risk
Rising
interest rates may hurt our profits and asset values.
In
response to the COVID-19 virus pandemic, the Federal Reserve Board’s Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) decreased interest
rates to near zero in March 2020. The low interest rate environment remained in effect at June 30, 2021, and the FOMC announced at its
September 2021 meeting that it could commence increasing interest rates in 2022.
If
interest rates rise, our net interest income may decline in the short term since, due to the generally shorter terms of interest-bearing
liabilities, interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities, increases more quickly than interest income earned on interest-earning
assets, such as loans and investments. In addition, rising interest rates may hurt our income because of reduced demand for new loans
and refinancing loans may in turn result in reduced interest and fee income earned on new loans and loan refinancings. While we believe
that modest interest rate increases will not significantly hurt our interest rate spread over the long term due to our high level of
liquidity and the presence of a significant amount of adjustable-rate mortgage loans in our loan portfolio, interest rate increases may
initially reduce our interest rate spread until such time as our loans and investments reprice to higher levels.
Changes
in interest rates also affect the value of our interest-earning assets, and in particular our securities portfolio. Generally, the value
of fixed-rate securities fluctuates inversely with changes in interest rates. Unrealized gains and losses on securities available for
sale are reported as separate components of equity. Decreases in the fair value of securities available for sale resulting from increases
in interest rates therefore could have an adverse effect on stockholders’ equity.
Risks
Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associated Economic Slowdown
The
ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and measures intended to prevent its spread could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition, and such effects will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and are difficult
to predict.
Global
health concerns relating to the COVID-19 outbreak and related government actions taken to reduce the spread of the virus have been weighing
on the macroeconomic environment, and the outbreak has significantly increased economic uncertainty and reduced economic activity. The
outbreak has resulted in authorities implementing numerous measures to try to contain the virus, such as travel bans and restrictions,
quarantines, shelter in place or stay-at-home orders and business limitations and shutdowns. Such measures have significantly contributed
to rising unemployment and negatively impacted consumer and business spending. Local jurisdictions have subsequently lifted stay-at-home
orders and moved to phased reopening of businesses, capacity restrictions and health and safety recommendations that encourage continued
physical distancing and teleworking have limited the ability of businesses to return to pre-pandemic levels of activity. The United States
government has taken steps to attempt to mitigate some of the more severe anticipated economic effects of the virus, including the passage
of the CARES Act, but there can be no assurance that such steps will be effective or achieve their desired results in a timely fashion.
The
outbreak has adversely impacted and is likely to further adversely impact our workforce and operations and the operations of our borrowers,
customers and business partners. In particular, we may experience financial losses due to a number of operational factors impacting us
or our borrowers, customers or business partners, including but not limited to:
|
●
|
Demand
for our products and services may decline, making it difficult to grow assets and income;
|
|
●
|
Credit
losses resulting from financial stress being experienced by our borrowers as a result of the outbreak and related governmental actions,
particularly in the hospitality, energy, retail and restaurant industries, but across other industries as well;
|
|
●
|
If
the economy is unable to substantially reopen, and high levels of unemployment continue for an extended period of time, loan delinquencies,
problem assets, and foreclosures may increase, resulting in increased charge-offs and reduced income;
|
|
●
|
Collateral
for loans, especially real estate, may decline in value, which could cause loan losses to increase;
|
|
●
|
Our
allowance for loan losses may have to be increased if borrowers experience financial difficulties beyond forbearance periods, which
will adversely affect our net income;
|
|
●
|
The
net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors may decline, impairing their ability to honor commitments to us;
|
|
●
|
As
the result of the decline in the Federal Reserve Board’s target federal funds rate, the yield on our assets may decline to
a greater extent than the decline in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities, reducing our net interest margin and spread and reducing
net income;
|
|
●
|
A
material decrease in net income or a net loss over several quarters could result in a decrease in the rate of our quarterly cash
dividend;
|
|
●
|
Operational
failures due to changes in our normal business practices necessitated by the outbreak and related governmental actions.
|
|
●
|
Increased
cyber and payment fraud risk, as cybercriminals attempt to profit from the disruption, given increased online and remote activity;
|
|
●
|
A
prolonged weakness in economic conditions resulting in a reduction of future projected earnings could result in our recording a valuation
allowance against our current outstanding deferred tax assets;
|
|
●
|
We
rely on third party vendors for certain services and the unavailability of a critical service due to the COVID-19 outbreak could
have an adverse effect on us; and
|
|
●
|
Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation premiums may increase if the agency experiences additional resolution costs.
|
The
pandemic has introduced increasing uncertainty around the local and national economy. Regulatory treatment of loan deferrals has been
changed to encourage loan deferrals. Although the deferrals may lessen credit losses in the long run, they make our credit metrics less
transparent, timely and useful. The increased volume of loan related work including processing deferrals, processing PPP loan requests
and changing regulations increases inherent credit risks, and loans with deferred payments are more likely to default in the future.
The Company believes there could be potential stresses on liquidity management as a direct result of the COVID-19 pandemic. As customers
manage their own liquidity stress, we could experience an increase in the utilization of existing lines of credit.
The
spread of COVID-19 has caused us to modify our business practices (including restricting employee travel, and developing work from home
and social distancing plans for our employees), and we may take further actions as may be required by government authorities or as we
determine are in the best interests of our employees, customers and business partners. There is no certainty that such measures will
be sufficient to mitigate the risks posed by the virus or will otherwise be satisfactory to government authorities.
The
extent to which the coronavirus outbreak impacts our business, results of operations and financial condition will depend on future developments,
which are highly uncertain and are difficult to predict, including, but not limited to, the duration and spread of the outbreak, its
severity, the actions to contain the virus or treat its impact, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions
can resume. Even after the COVID-19 outbreak has subsided, we may continue to experience materially adverse impacts to our business as
a result of the virus’s global economic impact, including the availability of credit, adverse impacts on our liquidity and any
recession that has occurred or may occur in the future.
There
are no comparable recent events that provide guidance as to the effect the spread of COVID-19 as a global pandemic may have, and, as
a result, the ultimate impact of the outbreak is highly uncertain and subject to change. We do not yet know the full extent of the impacts
on our business, our operations or the global economy as a whole.
Risks
Related to Our Lending Activities
If
our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our results of operations would be negatively affected.
In
determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, we analyze our loss and delinquency experience by loan categories and we consider
the effect of existing economic conditions. In addition, we make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan
portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for
the repayment of many of our loans. If the actual results are different from our estimates, or our analyses are incorrect, our allowance
for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, which would require additions to our allowance
and would decrease our net income. Our emphasis on loan growth and on increasing our portfolio, as well as any future credit deterioration,
will require us to increase our allowance further in the future. In addition, our banking regulators periodically review our allowance
for loan losses and could require us to increase our provision for loan losses. Any increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan
charge-offs as required by regulatory authorities may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
A
large percentage of our loans are collateralized by real estate and disruptions in the real estate market may result in losses and hurt
our earnings.
Approximately
96.3% of our loan portfolio at June 30, 2021 was comprised of loans collateralized by real estate. Disruptions in the real estate market
could significantly impair the value of our collateral and our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. The real estate collateral
in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower and may deteriorate in value during the
time the credit is extended. If real estate values decline, it will become more likely that we would be required to increase our allowance
for loan losses. If during a period of reduced real estate values, we are required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan to satisfy
the debt or to increase our allowance for loan losses, it could materially reduce our profitability and adversely affect our financial
condition.
Our
concentration of residential mortgage loans exposes us to increased lending risks.
At
June 30, 2021, $224.1 million, or 74.8%, of our loan portfolio was secured by one-to-four family real estate, all of which is located
in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and we intend to continue this type of lending in the foreseeable future. One-to-four family residential
mortgage lending is generally sensitive to regional and local economic conditions that significantly impact the ability of borrowers
to meet their loan payment obligations, making loss levels difficult to predict. A decline in residential real estate values as a result
of a downturn in the local housing markets or in the markets in neighboring states in which we originate residential mortgage loans could
reduce the value of the real estate collateral securing these types of loans. Declines in real estate values could cause some of our
residential mortgages to be inadequately collateralized, which would expose us to a greater risk of loss if we seek to recover on defaulted
loans by selling the real estate collateral.
The
distressed economy in First Federal of Hazard’s market area could hurt our profits and slow our growth.
Our
banks operate in three distinct market areas. First Federal of Hazard’s market area consists of Perry and surrounding counties
in eastern Kentucky. The economy in this market area has been distressed in recent years due to the decline in the coal industry on which
the economy has been dependent. While the region has seen improvement in the economy from the influx of other industries, such as health
care and manufacturing, the competition provided by new methods of extracting natural gas has recently hurt the coal industry. As a consequence,
the economy in First Federal of Hazard’s market area continues to lag behind the economies of Kentucky and the United States and
First Federal of Hazard has experienced insufficient loan demand in its market area. Moreover, the slow economy in First Federal of Hazard’s
market area will limit our ability to grow our asset base in that market.
Strong
competition within our market areas could hurt our profits and slow growth.
Although
we consider ourselves competitive in our market areas, we face intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. Price
competition for loans and deposits might result in our earning less on our loans and paying more on our deposits, which reduces net interest
income. Some of the institutions with which we compete have substantially greater resources than we have and may offer services that
we do not provide. We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and
the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Our profitability will depend upon our continued ability to
compete successfully in our market areas.
Risks
Related to Our Business and Industry Generally
We
expect that the implementation of a new accounting standard could require us to increase our allowance for loan losses and may have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has adopted a new accounting standard that will be effective for the Kentucky
First, First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023. This standard, referred to as
Current Expected Credit Loss, or CECL, will require financial institutions to determine periodic estimates of lifetime expected credit
losses on loans, and provide for the expected credit losses as allowances for loan losses. This will change the current method of providing
allowances for loan losses that are probable, which we expect could require us to increase our allowance for loan losses, and will likely
greatly increase the data we would need to collect and review to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses. Any
increase in our allowance for loan losses, or expenses incurred to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses,
may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Ineffective
liquidity management could adversely affect our financial results and condition.
Effective
liquidity management is essential for the operation of our business. We require sufficient liquidity to meet customer loan requests,
customer deposit maturities/withdrawals, payments on our debt obligations as they come due and other cash commitments under both normal
operating conditions and other unpredictable circumstances causing industry or general financial market stress. Our access to funding
sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities on terms that are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us
specifically or the financial services industry or economy generally. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity
sources include a downturn in the geographic markets in which our loans and operations are concentrated or difficult credit markets.
Our access to deposits may also be affected by the liquidity needs of our depositors. In particular, a majority of our liabilities are
checking accounts and other liquid deposits, which are payable on demand or upon several days’ notice, while by comparison, a substantial
majority of our assets are loans, which cannot be called or sold in the same time frame. Although we have historically been able to replace
maturing deposits and advances as necessary, we might not be able to replace such funds in the future, especially if a large number of
our depositors seek to withdraw their accounts, regardless of the reason. A failure to maintain adequate liquidity could materially and
adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.
We
may be adversely affected by recent changes in U.S. tax laws and regulations.
Changes
in tax laws contained in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was enacted in December 2017, include a number of provisions that will
have an impact on the banking industry, borrowers and the market for residential real estate. Included in this legislation were: (i) a
lower limit on the deductibility of mortgage interest on single-family residential mortgage loans, (ii) the elimination of interest deductions
for home equity loans, (iii) a limitation on the deductibility of business interest expense and (iv) a limitation on the deductibility
of property taxes and state and local income taxes.
The
recent changes in the tax laws may have an adverse effect on the market for, and valuation of, residential properties, and on the demand
for such loans in the future, and could make it harder for borrowers to make their loan payments. If home ownership becomes less attractive,
demand for mortgage loans could decrease. The value of the properties securing loans in our loan portfolio may be adversely impacted
as a result of the changing economics of home ownership, which could require an increase in our provision for loan losses, which would
reduce our profitability and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Regulation
of the financial services industry is undergoing major changes, and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.
We
are subject to extensive government regulation, supervision and examination. Such regulation, supervision and examination governs the
activities in which we may engage, and is intended primarily for the protection of the deposit insurance fund and our depositors.
In
2010 and 2011, in response to the financial crisis and recession that began in 2008, significant regulatory and legislative changes
resulted in broad reform and increased regulation affecting financial institutions. The Dodd-Frank Act has created a significant
shift in the way financial institutions operate and has restructured the regulation of depository institutions by merging the Office
of Thrift Supervision, which previously regulated the Banks, into the OCC, and assigning the regulation of savings and loan holding
companies, including the Company and the MHC, to the Federal Reserve Board. The Dodd-Frank Act also created the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau to administer consumer protection and fair lending laws, a function that was formerly performed by the depository
institution regulators. As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the federal banking regulators have proposed new consolidated capital
requirements that will limit our ability to borrow at the holding company level and invest the proceeds from such borrowings as
capital in the Banks that could be leveraged to support additional growth. The Dodd-Frank Act contains various other provisions
designed to enhance the regulation of depository institutions and prevent the recurrence of a financial crisis such as that which
occurred in 2008 and 2009. The full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our business and operations may not be known for years until
final regulations implementing the legislation are adopted. The Dodd-Frank Act may have a material impact on our operations,
particularly through increased regulatory burden and compliance costs. Any future legislative changes could have a material impact
on our profitability, the value of assets held for investment or the value of collateral for loans. Future legislative changes could
also require changes to business practices and potentially expose us to additional costs, liabilities, enforcement action and
reputational risk. In addition to the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, the federal regulatory agencies recently have begun to take
stronger supervisory actions against financial institutions that have experienced increased loan losses and other weaknesses as a
result of the recent economic crisis. These actions include the entering into of written agreements and cease and desist orders that
place certain limitations on their operations. Federal banking regulators recently have also been using with more frequency their
ability to impose individual minimal capital requirements on banks, which requirements may be higher than those imposed under the
Dodd-Frank Act or which would otherwise qualify the bank as being “well capitalized” under the OCC’s prompt
corrective action regulations. If we were to become subject to a supervisory agreement or higher individual capital requirements,
such action may have a negative impact on our ability to execute our business plans, as well as our ability to grow, pay dividends,
repurchase stock or engage in mergers and acquisitions and may result in restrictions in our operations. See “Regulation
and Supervision—Regulation of Federal Savings Associations—Capital Requirements” for a discussion of
regulatory capital requirements.
We
may be subject to more stringent capital requirements which could result in lower returns on equity, require the raising of additional
capital, and limit our ability to pay dividends or repurchase shares of our common stock.
In
July 2013, the OCC and the Federal Reserve Board approved a new rule that will substantially amend the regulatory risk-based capital
rules applicable to First Federal of Hazard, First Federal of Kentucky and Kentucky First. The final rule implements the “Basel
III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rule includes new minimum risk-based capital
and leverage ratios, which became effective for First Federal of Hazard, First Federal of Kentucky and Kentucky First on January 1, 2015,
and refines the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating these ratios. The new minimum capital
requirements are: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 to risk-based assets capital ratio of 6% (increased
from 4%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 8% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. The final rule also
establishes a “capital conservation” buffer of 2.5%, and will result in the following minimum ratios: (i) a common equity
Tier 1 capital ratio of 7%; (ii) a Tier 1 to risk-based assets capital ratio of 8.5%; and (iii) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. The new
capital conservation buffer requirement was phased in beginning in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and increased each
year until fully implemented in January 2019. An institution will be subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases,
and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations will establish a maximum percentage
of eligible retained income that can be utilized for such actions. As of June 30, 2021, the capital levels of First Federal of Hazard
and First Federal of Kentucky exceed the required capital amounts according to the Community Bank Leverage Ratio regulations and we believe
they also meet the fully-phased in minimum capital requirements. See Note K-Stockholders’ Equity and Regulatory Capital of Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The
application of more stringent capital requirements for us could among other things, result in lower returns on equity, require the raising
of additional capital, and result in regulatory actions constraining us from paying dividends or repurchasing shares if we were unable
to comply with such requirements. See “Regulation and Supervision—Regulation of Federal Savings Associations—Capital
Requirements.”
We
are subject to certain risks in connection with our use of technology.
Our
security measures may not be sufficient to mitigate the risk of a cyber attack. Communications and information systems are essential
to the conduct of our business, as we use such systems to manage our customer relationships, our general ledger and virtually all other
aspects of our business. Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage, and transmission of confidential and other information
in our computer systems and networks. Although we take protective measures and endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant, the
security of our computer systems, software, and networks may be vulnerable to breaches, unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses,
or other malicious code and cyber attacks that could have a security impact. If one or more of these events occur, this could jeopardize
our or our customers’ confidential and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems
and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations or the operations of our customers or counterparties.
We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities
or other exposures, and we may be subject to litigation and financial losses that are either not insured against or not fully covered
through any insurance maintained by us. We could also suffer significant reputational damage.
Security
breaches in our Internet banking activities could further expose us to possible liability and damage our reputation. Any compromise of
our security also could deter customers from using our Internet banking services that involve the transmission of confidential information.
We rely on standard Internet security systems to provide the security and authentication necessary to effect secure transmission of data.
These precautions may not protect our systems from compromises or breaches of our security measures, which could result in significant
legal liability and significant damage to our reputation and our business.
Our
security measures may not protect us from systems failures or interruptions.
While
we have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit the impact of systems failures and interruptions, there can be no assurance
that such events will not occur or that they will be adequately addressed if they do. In addition, we outsource certain aspects of our
data processing and other operational functions to certain third-party providers. If our third-party providers encounter difficulties,
or if we have difficulty in communicating with them, our ability to adequately process and account for transactions could be affected,
and our business operations could be adversely impacted. Threats to information security also exist in the processing of customer information
through various other vendors and their personnel.
The
occurrence of any failures or interruptions may require us to identify alternative sources of such services, and we cannot assure you
that we could negotiate terms that are as favorable to us, or could obtain services with similar functionality as found in our existing
systems without the need to expend substantial resources, if at all. Further, the occurrence of any systems failure or interruption could
damage our reputation and result in a loss of customers and business, could subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or could expose
us to legal liability. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We
must keep pace with technological change to remain competitive.
Financial
products and services have become increasingly technology-driven. Our ability to meet the needs of our customers competitively, and in
a cost-efficient manner, is dependent on the ability to keep pace with technological advances and to invest in new technology as it becomes
available, as well as related essential personnel. In addition, technology has lowered barriers to entry into the financial services
market and made it possible for financial technology companies and other non-bank entities to offer financial products and services traditionally
provided by banks. The ability to keep pace with technological change is important, and the failure to do so, due to cost, proficiency
or otherwise, could have a material adverse impact on our business and therefore on our financial condition and results of operations.
If
we are required to impair our goodwill, intangibles, or other long lived assets, our financial condition and results of operations would
be adversely affected.
Pursuant
to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other and ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment,
we are required to perform an annual impairment review of goodwill, intangibles and other long lived assets which could result in an
impairment charge if it is determined that the carrying value of the assets are in excess of the fair value. We perform the impairment
test annually during our fourth fiscal quarter. Goodwill, intangibles and other long lived assets are also tested more frequently if
changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events indicates that a potential impairment exists. When changes in circumstances, such
as changes in the variables associated with the judgments, assumptions and estimates made in assessing the appropriate fair value indicate
the carrying amount of certain assets may not be recoverable, the assets are evaluated for impairment. If actual operating results differ
from these assumptions, it may result in an asset impairment. As of June 30, 2020, management early adopted ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill
and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the required method for estimating the fair
value of the Company. Future write-downs of intangibles and other long lived assets could affect certain of the financial covenants under
our debt agreements, could restrict our financial flexibility, and would impact our results of operations.
Risks
Related to Our Holding Company Structure
First
Federal MHC owns a majority of our common stock and is able to exercise voting control over most matters put to a vote of stockholders,
including preventing sale or merger transactions you may like or a second-step conversion by First Federal MHC.
First
Federal MHC owns a majority of our common stock and, through its Board of Directors, is able to exercise voting control over most matters
put to a vote of stockholders. As a federally chartered mutual holding company, the board of directors of First Federal MHC must ensure
that the interests of depositors of First Federal of Hazard are represented and considered in matters put to a vote of stockholders of
Kentucky First. Therefore, the votes cast by First Federal MHC may not be in your personal best interests as a stockholder. For example,
First Federal MHC may exercise its voting control to prevent a sale or merger transaction in which stockholders could receive a premium
for their shares, prevent a second-step conversion transaction by First Federal MHC or defeat a stockholder nominee for election to the
Board of Directors of Kentucky First. However, implementation of a stock-based incentive plan will require approval of Kentucky First’s
stockholders other than First Federal MHC. Federal Reserve Board regulations would likely prevent an acquisition of Kentucky First other
than by another mutual holding company or a mutual institution.
Our
ability to pay dividends is subject to the ability of First Federal of Hazard and First Federal of Kentucky to make capital distributions
to Kentucky First and the waiver of dividends by First Federal MHC.
Our
long-term ability to pay dividends to our stockholders is based primarily upon the ability of the Banks to make capital distributions
to Kentucky First, and also on the availability of cash at the holding company level in the event earnings are not sufficient to pay
dividends according to the cash dividend payout policy. Under Office of the Comptroller of the Currency safe harbor regulations, the
Banks may each distribute to Kentucky First capital not exceeding net retained income for the current calendar year and the prior two
calendar years. First Federal MHC owns a majority of Kentucky First’s outstanding stock. First Federal MHC has historically waived
its right to dividends on the Kentucky First common shares it owns, in which case the amount of dividends paid to public stockholders
is significantly higher than it would be if First Federal MHC accepted dividends. First Federal MHC is not required to waive dividends,
but Kentucky First expects this practice to continue, subject to member and regulatory approval annually. First Federal MHC is required
to obtain a waiver from the Federal Reserve Board allowing it to waive its right to dividends.
The
Federal Reserve Board in 2011 issued regulations that govern the activities of Kentucky First and First Federal MHC and the regulations
were implemented in the fourth quarter of 2011. Under Section 239.8(d) of the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation MM governing dividend
waivers, a mutual holding company may waive its right to dividends on shares of its subsidiary if the mutual holding company gives written
notice of the waiver to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Board does not object. For a company such as First Federal
MHC that waived dividends prior to December 1, 2009, the Federal Reserve Board may not object to a dividend waiver if such waiver would
not be detrimental to the safety and soundness of the savings association subsidiary and the board of directors of the mutual holding
company expressly determines that such dividend waiver is consistent with the board’s fiduciary duties to the members of the mutual
holding company.
To
address concerns with respect to the conflict of interest created by dividend waivers, Regulation MM requires the board of directors
of the mutual holding company to adopt a resolution that describes the conflict of interest that exists because of a director’s
ownership of stock in the subsidiary declaring the dividends and any actions the mutual holding company board have taken to eliminate
the conflict of interest, such as the directors’ waiving their right to receive dividends. Also, the resolution must contain an
affirmation that a majority of the mutual members eligible to vote have, within the 12 months prior to the declaration date of the dividend,
voted to approve the waiver of dividends.
First
Federal MHC has received Federal Reserve Board approval to waive quarterly dividends totaling $0.40 per share annually beginning with
the dividend paid on September 28, 2012 and continuing through the dividend payable in the third quarter of 2022. It is expected that
First Federal MHC will continue to waive future dividends, except to the extent dividends are needed to fund First Federal MHC’s
continuing operations, subject to the ability of First Federal MHC to obtain regulatory approval of its requests to waive dividends and
to its ability to obtain member approval of dividend waivers.
We
cannot predict whether members will continue to approve annual dividend waiver requests or whether the Federal Reserve Board will grant
future dividend waiver requests and, if granted, there can be no assurance as to the conditions, if any, the Federal Reserve Board will
place on future dividend waiver requests by grandfathered mutual holding companies such as First Federal MHC. If First Federal MHC is
unable to waive the receipt of dividends, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders may be substantially impaired and the amounts
of any such dividends may be significantly reduced.