Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share
data)
1. Business
Everyday Health, Inc. (the “Company”)
operates a leading digital marketing and communications platform for healthcare marketers seeking to engage and influence consumers
and healthcare professionals. The Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware in January 2002 as Agora Media Inc., and changed
its name to Waterfront Media Inc. in January 2004. In January 2010, the Company changed its name to Everyday Health, Inc. to better
align its corporate identity with the
Everyday Health
brand.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. The results of operations for companies acquired are included
in the consolidated financial statements from the effective date of the acquisition. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Interim Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) on
the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 and, in the opinion of management,
include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position,
results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. The results of operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2016 or any other future periods, due to seasonality and other business factors. Certain information and note
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted under the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto for
the year ended December 31, 2015, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March
11, 2016.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial
statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates
on historical experience, current business factors and other available information. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions, including those related to revenue recognition and deferred
revenue, allowance for doubtful accounts, internal software development costs and website development costs, valuation of long-lived
assets, goodwill and other intangible assets, certain accrued liabilities, income taxes and stock-based compensation.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made
to the prior period financial statements to conform to the September 30, 2016 presentation.
Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue
The Company generates its revenue from (i)
advertising and sponsorships and (ii) premium services, including consumer subscriptions, SaaS-based licensing fees and other licensing
fees. Advertising revenue is recognized in the period in which the advertisement is delivered. Revenue from sponsorships, which
includes time and materials based creative services, is recognized over the period the Company substantially satisfies its contractual
obligations as required under the respective sponsorship agreements. When contractual arrangements contain multiple elements, revenue
is allocated to each element based on its relative fair value determined using prices charged when elements are sold separately.
In instances where individual deliverables are not sold separately, or when third-party evidence is not available, fair value is
determined based on management’s best estimate of selling price.
Subscriptions are generally paid in advance
on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis. Subscription revenue, after deducting refunds and charge-backs, is recognized on a straight-line
basis ratably over the subscription periods. SaaS and other licensing revenue is generally recognized on a straight-line basis
ratably over the life of the contract.
Deferred revenue relates to: (i) subscription
fees for which amounts have been collected but for which revenue has not been recognized, and (ii) advertising and sponsorship
fees and licensing fees billed in advance of when the revenue is to be earned.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues consists principally of
the expenses associated with aggregating the total audience across the Company’s websites, including (i) royalty expenses
for licensing content for certain websites and for the portion of advertising revenue the Company pays to the owners of certain
other websites, and (ii) media costs associated with audience aggregation activities. Cost of revenues also includes market research
incentives, direct mail marketing and fulfillment costs, data fees for our SaaS-based platform, as well as out-of-pocket costs
related to creative services and costs associated with subscription fees for premium services, ad serving and other expenses.
Media costs consist primarily of fees paid
to online publishers, Internet search companies and other media channels for search engine and database marketing, and display
advertising. These media activities are attributable to revenue-generating and audience aggregation events, designed to increase
the audience to the websites the Company operates and grow the Company’s registered user base.
Comprehensive Loss
The Company has no items of other comprehensive
loss, and accordingly net loss is equal to comprehensive loss for all periods presented.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Due to their short-term maturities, the
carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable and accrued expenses, approximate fair value. Cash equivalents principally consist of the Company’s investment in
U.S. Treasury securities and other highly liquid money market funds. The fair value of these investment funds is based on quoted
market prices, which are Level 1 inputs, pursuant to the fair value accounting standard, which establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and requires disclosures about fair value measurements by establishing a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value. The fair value of the Company’s debt approximates the recorded amounts as the interest
rates on the credit facilities are based on market interest rates.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from three to five
years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or
the estimated useful life of the improvement.
The Company incurs costs to develop software
for internal use. The Company expenses all costs that relate to the planning and post-implementation phases of development as product
development expense. Costs incurred in the application development phase, consisting principally of payroll and related benefits,
are capitalized. Upon completion, the capitalized costs are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful
lives, which is generally three years.
The Company also incurs costs to develop
its websites and mobile applications. The Company expenses all costs that relate to the planning and post-implementation phases
of development as product development expense. Costs incurred in the application development phase, consisting principally of third-party
consultants and related charges, and the costs of content determined to provide a future economic benefit, are capitalized. Upon
completion, the capitalized costs are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, which is generally
three years.
The Company reviews property and equipment
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable.
There were no indicators of impairment of the Company’s property and equipment during the nine months ended September 30,
2016. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, an impairment charge of $1,416 was recorded related to certain
software development projects which the Company decided not to move forward with. The $1,416 charge is included in product development
expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Segment Information
The Company and its subsidiaries are organized
in a single operating segment, providing digital health marketing and communications solutions, and the Company also has one reportable
segment. Substantially all of the Company’s revenues are derived from U.S. sources.
Recent Accounting Standards
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amended guidance for reporting discontinued operations. Under the new guidance, only
disposals that represent a strategic shift having a material impact on an entity’s operations and financial results shall
be reported as discontinued operations, with expanded disclosures. The Company adopted this amended guidance as of January 1, 2016,
noting no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued an accounting
standards update amending revenue recognition guidance and requiring more detailed disclosures to enable users of financial statements
to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In August
2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of the revenue recognition guidance to reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2017. Early adoption is permitted for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is continuing to evaluate
its method of adoption and the impact this accounting standard, and related amendments and interpretations, will have on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance
on stock compensation accounting requiring that a performance target that affects vesting and could be achieved after the requisite
service period should be treated as a performance condition. Historically GAAP did not contain explicit guidance on how to account
for such share-based payments. The Company adopted this amended guidance as of January 1, 2016, noting no material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In April 2015, the FASB issued updated guidance
on the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. The new guidance requires an entity to present such costs in
the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of debt issuance
costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. The Company adopted the amendment retrospectively effective January 1,
2016. As a result of the retrospective adoption, the Company reclassified the unamortized deferred financing costs previously recorded
in other assets, including $1,998 and $1,888 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, to long-term debt in
the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The adoption of this guidance had no impact on the Company’s consolidated
statements of operations.
In April 2015, the FASB issued new authoritative
accounting guidance on customer’s accounting for fees paid in a cloud computing arrangement, which provides guidance to customers
about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license,
the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software
licenses. If the arrangement does not include a software license, it should be accounted for as a service contract. The revised
guidance was effective as of January 1, 2016 and is applied prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified
after the effective date. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements and related disclosures.
In September 2015, the FASB issued updated
guidance on business combinations accounting requiring the acquirer to recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified
during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Previously, such adjustments
were required to be retrospectively recorded in prior period financial information. The Company adopted this amended guidance as
of January 1, 2016, noting no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In November 2015, the FASB issued updated
guidance on balance sheet classification of deferred taxes, requiring all deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any related
valuation allowance, to be classified as non-current on the balance sheet. The classification change for all deferred taxes as
non-current simplifies entities’ processes as it eliminates the need to separately identify the net current and net non-current
deferred tax asset or liability in each jurisdiction and allocate valuation allowances. This guidance is effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods, with earlier application permitted. The Company
elected to early adopt this guidance on a retrospective basis beginning in the quarter ended December 31, 2015.
In February 2016, the FASB issued updated
guidance on leases which, for operating leases, requires a lessee to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception
of short-term leases) at the commencement date: a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments
arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s
right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with earlier application permitted. The Company is
currently evaluating the effects of the adoption and has not yet determined the impact the revised guidance will have on the consolidated
financial statements and related disclosures.
In March 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance
on the accounting for employee share-based payments which requires all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to be recognized
in the income statement instead of as additional paid-in capital, with prospective application required. The guidance also changes
the classification of such tax benefits or tax deficiencies on the consolidated statement of cash flows from a financing activity
to an operating activity, with prospective application required. Additionally, the guidance changes the classification of employee
taxes paid when an employer withholds shares for tax-withholding purposes on the consolidated statement of cash flows from an operating
activity, previously included in the changes in accounts payable, to a financing activity, with retrospective application required.
This amended guidance will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those
annual periods, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of the adoption and has not yet
determined the impact the revised guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In August 2016, the FASB issued updated
guidance related to the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments. This guidance addresses eight specific cash
flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are
presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. For public entities, the update becomes effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the effects of adoption and has not yet determined the impact the revised guidance will have on the consolidated financial
statements and related disclosures.
3. Acquisitions
Tea Leaves Health, LLC
In August 2015, the Company acquired 100%
of the limited liability company membership interests of Tea Leaves Health, LLC (“Tea Leaves”), a provider of a SaaS-based
marketing and analytics platform for hospital systems to identify and engage consumers and physicians. The purchase price was valued
at $29,893, consisting of (i) $15,000 in cash paid at closing; (ii) 327,784 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at
$3,893, issued at closing and held in escrow for potential post-closing working capital and/or indemnification claims; and (iii)
$11,000 to be paid within six months of closing in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination of cash and
shares of the Company’s common stock, in the Company’s sole discretion. As a result of $355 working capital and purchase
price adjustments, the fair value of the total consideration amounts to $29,538. In February 2016, the Company entered into an
amendment to the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement between the Company, Tea Leaves and the other parties thereto. The amendment
effected certain modifications to the payment terms of the deferred portion of the guaranteed consideration and the terms of the
potential earn-out payment. With respect to the deferred portion of the guaranteed consideration initially scheduled to be paid
within six months of closing, the payment schedule was amended and $5,000 was paid in cash during the three months ended March
31, 2016 and the remaining $5,828 deferred purchase price and related interest was paid in cash during the three months ended June
30, 2016, satisfying the guaranteed portion of the purchase price obligations in full.
In addition to the purchase price, the former
members of Tea Leaves are eligible to receive an additional $20,000 based on the achievement of a specified financial target as
of December 31, 2016, which, if earned, will be paid in the first quarter of 2017. If earned, the payment will be settled 50% in
cash and 50% in shares of the Company’s common stock (see Note 11). The February 2016 amendment permits the former members
of Tea Leaves to promptly receive $5,000 of the total $20,000 earn-out if the specified financial target is achieved at any time
prior to December 31, 2016, and such amount is not subject to forfeiture. If the $5,000 payment is made prior to December 31, 2016,
the remaining $15,000 of the earn-out remains subject to achievement of the financial target as of December 31, 2016, and will
be paid in the first quarter of 2017, if earned. If the $5,000 payment is not made as the financial target is not met during 2016,
but is met as of December 31, 2016, the full $20,000 earn-out payment will be paid in the first quarter of 2017. The earn-out payment
is contingent upon the continued employment with the Company of certain former members of Tea Leaves, and the Company records such
earn-outs as compensation expense. The Company accrued $3,530 and $10,589 in compensation expense related to the earn-out during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, which together with $5,882 accrued during 2015 is reflected in
accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2016. Of the $10,589 earn-out
accrued during 2016, $7,412 is included in product development expense, $2,118 is included in sales and marketing expense, and
$1,059 is included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2016.
The acquisition was accounted for as a business
combination and, accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on the respective fair values. The results of operations of Tea Leaves have been included in the consolidated financial statements
of the Company from August 6, 2015, the closing date of the acquisition.
The following table summarizes the allocation
of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values.
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
778
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
19
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
3,404
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
3,410
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
23,159
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(993
|
)
|
Total consideration paid
|
|
$
|
29,538
|
|
Goodwill recognized as a result of the Tea
Leaves acquisition is primarily attributable to expected synergies from enabling the Company to offer an integrated suite of software
and media solutions that will allow hospital systems to target both consumers and physicians. All of the goodwill is expected to
be deductible for tax purposes.
Cambridge BioMarketing Group, LLC
In March 2015, the Company acquired 100%
of the limited liability company membership interests of Cambridge BioMarketing Group, LLC (“Cambridge”), a provider
of strategic launch and marketing solutions for orphan and rare disease products, for a total purchase price of $32,273, of which
$24,273 was paid in cash at closing. The remaining $8,000 obligation at closing was comprised of convertible notes that could either
convert into shares of the Company’s common stock or be paid in cash at the discretion of the Company. The Company paid the
$8,000 obligation in cash in May 2015. As a result of $216 working capital and other purchase price adjustments, the fair value
of the total consideration amounts to $32,057. In addition to the purchase price described above, the former members of Cambridge
were eligible to receive up to an additional $5,000 in cash based on Cambridge’s achievement of certain revenue and Adjusted
EBITDA targets for 2015. This earn-out payment was contingent upon the continued employment with the Company of certain former
members of Cambridge at the time the earn-out payment was due. The Company records such earn-outs as compensation expense for the
applicable periods, with all but $87 of the $5,000 having been accrued during 2015. During the three months ended March 31, 2016,
the Company paid $5,000 in cash and recorded the remaining $87 expense related to this earn-out.
The acquisition was accounted for as a
business combination and, accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on the respective fair values. The results of operations of Cambridge have been included in the consolidated financial
statements of the Company from March 20, 2015, the closing date of the acquisition.
The following table summarizes the allocation
of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values.
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
4,406
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
137
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
783
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
15,360
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
14,280
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(2,659
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Total consideration paid
|
|
$
|
32,057
|
|
Goodwill recognized as a result of the
Cambridge acquisition is primarily attributable to expected synergies from broadening the Company’s strategic marketing and
communications solutions to pharmaceutical brands targeting orphan and rare diseases. All of the goodwill is expected to be deductible
for tax purposes.
4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
During the nine months ended September 30,
2016, goodwill decreased by $172 during the subsequent measurement period from purchase price adjustments related to the Tea Leaves
acquisition (see Note 3).
The carrying value of the Company’s
goodwill was $165,099 as of September 30, 2016. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis as of October 1, and whenever
events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. Application of the impairment test
requires judgment and results in impairment being recognized if the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. No indicators
of impairment were noted during or since the Company’s last evaluation of goodwill at October 1, 2015. Similarly, the Company’s
definite-lived intangible assets with a net carrying value of $39,775 at September 30, 2016, consisting principally of trade names
and customer relationships, is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value
of the asset may not be recoverable. There were no indicators of impairment of the Company’s definite-lived intangible assets
during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.
Definite-lived intangible assets consist
of the following:
|
|
September 30, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
Gross
carrying
amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
|
|
Net
carrying
amount
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
remaining
useful
life
(1)
|
|
|
Gross
carrying
amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
|
|
Net
carrying
amount
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
remaining
useful
life
(1)
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
40,090
|
|
|
$
|
(16,467
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,623
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
$
|
40,090
|
|
|
$
|
(14,206
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,884
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
24,985
|
|
|
|
(9,415
|
)
|
|
|
15,570
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
24,985
|
|
|
|
(7,123
|
)
|
|
|
17,862
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
Other intangibles
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
65,727
|
|
|
$
|
(25,952
|
)
|
|
$
|
39,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,075
|
|
|
$
|
(21,329
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The calculation of the weighted-average remaining useful life is based on weighting the net book value of each asset in its group, and applying the weight to its respective remaining amortization period.
|
Amortization expense relating to the definite-lived
intangible assets totaled $1,541 and $1,695 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $4,623 and
$4,623 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Future amortization expense of the intangible
assets is estimated to be as follows:
Year ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
2016 (October 1st to December 31st)
|
|
$
|
1,541
|
|
2017
|
|
|
6,156
|
|
2018
|
|
|
5,848
|
|
2019
|
|
|
5,667
|
|
2020
|
|
|
5,645
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
14,918
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
39,775
|
|
5. Long-Term Debt
The Company entered into a credit
facility agreement with a syndicated bank group in March 2014, which replaced its then-existing credit facility. The new
credit facility consisted of a revolver (“Revolver”) with a maximum borrowing limit of $35,000 and a term loan
(“Term Loan”) of $40,000. In November 2014, in connection with an acquisition, the credit facility was amended
and restated to, among other things, (i) increase the maximum borrowing limit of the Revolver from $35,000 to $55,000;
(ii) increase the Term Loan from $39,000 outstanding as of such date to $60,000; (iii) extend the maturity date of the
Term Loan and the due date of principal on the Revolver from March 2019 to November 2019; and (iv) effect certain
modifications to the covenants and terms set forth in the credit facility agreement. In March 2015, the amended and restated
credit facility was further amended twice to, among other things, (i) consent to the acquisition of Cambridge; (ii) increase
the Term Loan from $59,250 outstanding as of such date to $67,750; (iii) increase the maximum borrowing limit of the
Revolver from $55,000 to $82,250; and (iv) effect certain modifications to the covenants and terms set forth in the
credit facility agreement. In August 2015, the Company entered into a third amendment to the credit facility to modify a
certain defined term; however, all other material terms and conditions of the credit facility remained unchanged by the
August 2015 amendment. In February 2016 and September 2016, the Company entered into further
amendments to the credit facility (as amended, the “Credit Facility”), which effected certain
modifications to the financial covenants and terms set forth in the Credit Facility.
The repayment terms of the Revolver provide
for quarterly interest payments, with the principal being due in full in November 2019. The repayment terms of the Term Loan provide
for quarterly interest and principal payments, with a maturity date of November 2019. On an annual basis, a calculation is performed
to determine excess cash flow, as defined in the Credit Facility agreement, which could result in a mandatory prepayment of excess
cash flow in addition to the aforementioned scheduled Term Loan payments. In April 2016, the Company paid $4,494 as a mandatory
prepayment of excess cash flow, treated as a reduction to the Term Loan principal balance. The interest rate on the Credit Facility
is equal to the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus a variable rate ranging from 2.75% to 4.0% depending on the Company’s
consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Facility agreement, and there is a 0.50% commitment fee on the unused portion
of the Revolver. As of September 30, 2016, the interest rate on the Credit Facility was 4.90%. As of September 30, 2016, there
was $56,481 outstanding on the Term Loan and $60,000 outstanding on the Revolver, with $22,250 available to be drawn on the Revolver.
The Credit Facility contains certain financial
and operational covenants, including requirements to maintain a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum
consolidated leverage ratio, each as defined in the Credit Facility agreement, as well as restrictions on certain types of dispositions,
mergers and acquisitions, indebtedness, investments, liens and capital expenditures, issuance of capital stock and the Company’s
ability to pay dividends. The Credit Facility is secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the Company’s
existing and future assets. The Company was in compliance with the financial and operational covenants of the Credit Facility as
of September 30, 2016.
During the years ended December 31, 2015
and December 31, 2014, the Company incurred financing costs totaling $792 and $2,899, respectively. During the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred financing costs of $220 and $575, respectively in connection with the February 2016
and September 2016 amendments to the Credit Facility. The long-term debt balances as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015
in the accompanying balance sheets are presented net of unamortized deferred financing costs of $1,998 and $1,888, respectively.
6. Common Stock and Preferred Stock
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31,
2015, there were no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.
In April 2014, in connection with the closing
of the Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”), the Company filed an amended and restated certificate of incorporation
with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware that amended and restated in its entirety the Company’s certificate
of incorporation to, among other things, increase the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock that the Company
is authorized to issue to 90,000,000, eliminate all references to the various series of preferred stock that were previously authorized
(including certain protective measures held by the various series of preferred stock), and to authorize up to 10,000,000 shares
of undesignated preferred stock that may be issued from time to time with terms to be set by the Company’s Board of Directors,
which rights could be senior to those of the Company’s common stock.
7. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has granted non-statutory stock
options and restricted stock unit awards to employees, directors and consultants of the Company pursuant to its 2003 Stock Option
Plan, as amended (the “2003 Plan”), and 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which became effective
immediately upon the signing of the underwriting agreement related to the IPO in March 2014. Upon the effectiveness of the 2014
Plan, no additional equity awards have been or will be granted under the 2003 Plan. The 2014 Plan provides for the grant of stock
options, restricted stock units, and other awards based on the Company’s common stock.
As of September 30, 2016, 381,893 shares
have been reserved for issuance under the 2014 Plan. The number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2014
Plan is subject to an automatic increase on January 1 of each year through January 1, 2024, by the lesser of (a) 4% of the total
number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year and (b) a number
of shares determined by the Board of Directors.
Stock Options
The following table summarizes stock option
activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016:
|
|
Number of
options
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
exercise
price
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
remaining
contractual
life (years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
5,991,945
|
|
|
$
|
10.21
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
|
|
$
|
442
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
28,300
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(85,646
|
)
|
|
|
5.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(376,098
|
)
|
|
|
13.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016
|
|
|
5,558,501
|
|
|
$
|
10.02
|
|
|
|
4.76
|
|
|
$
|
2,316
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2016
|
|
|
4,644,603
|
|
|
$
|
9.47
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
|
|
$
|
2,251
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of options and
the total intrinsic value of the options exercised were $390 and $122, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2016,
and $112 and $112, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2015. Proceeds from the exercise of options and the total
intrinsic value of the options exercised were $494 and $146, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, and $1,881
and $1,388, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
The weighted-average fair value per share
at date of grant for options granted was $2.25 and $5.36 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The
fair value of options granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and recognized in
expense over the vesting period of the options using the graded attribution method.
The following table presents the weighted-average
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of options granted in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
39.12
|
%
|
|
|
43.40
|
%
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.48
|
%
|
|
|
1.73
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
The expected stock price volatilities are
estimated based on historical realized volatilities of comparable publicly traded company stock prices over a period of time commensurate
with the expected term of the option award. The expected life represents the period of time for which the options granted are expected
to be outstanding. The Company used the simplified method for determining expected life for options qualifying for treatment due
to the limited history the Company currently has with option exercise activity. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S.
Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected term of the options on the grant date.
Total stock-based compensation expense related
to stock options was $597 and $1,471 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $1,769 and $4,940
for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
At September 30, 2016, there was approximately
$1,555 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 1.02 years. The total fair value of stock options vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was
$3,189 and $5,183, respectively.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards
The Company’s restricted stock unit
awards (“RSUs”) are agreements to issue shares of the Company’s common stock to employees in the future, upon
the satisfaction of certain vesting conditions, which cause them to be subject to risk of forfeiture and restrict the award-holder’s
ability to sell or otherwise transfer such RSUs until they vest. Generally, the Company’s RSU grants vest over three years
from the grant date, or in certain instances over a shorter period, subject to continued employment on the applicable vesting dates.
The following table summarizes the unvested RSU activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2016:
|
|
Number of
RSUs
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
548,840
|
|
|
$
|
11.97
|
|
Granted
(1)
|
|
|
2,176,243
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(935,349
|
)
|
|
|
6.90
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(111,446
|
)
|
|
|
10.58
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2016
|
|
|
1,678,288
|
|
|
$
|
6.57
|
|
|
(1)
|
RSUs granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 includes the grant of 40,000 units of performance-based RSUs that are dependent upon the Company meeting certain performance criteria. The Company has adjusted stock-based compensation expense recognized to-date to reflect estimated performance related to these awards.
|
The total grant-date fair value of RSUs
vested during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $655 and $5,394, respectively. The total grant-date fair value
of RSUs vested during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $0 and $26, respectively. The fair value of RSUs granted
is recognized in expense over the vesting period using the graded attribution method. Total stock-based compensation expense related
to RSUs was $2,120 and $1,343 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $8,576 and $2,867 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
At September 30, 2016, there was approximately
$5,226 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested RSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 1.12 years.
2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The ESPP, which became effective immediately
upon the signing of the underwriting agreement related to the IPO in March 2014, authorized the issuance of 500,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock pursuant to purchase rights granted to employees. The number of shares of common stock reserved for
issuance under the ESPP will automatically increase on January 1 of each calendar year from January 1, 2015 through January 1,
2024 by the least of (a) 1% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar
year, (b) 400,000 shares and (c) a number determined by the Board of Directors that is less than (a) and (b). Unless otherwise
determined by the Board of Directors, common stock will be purchased for participating employees at a price per share equal to
the lower of (a) 85% of the fair market value of a share of the common stock on the first date of an offering, or (b) 85% of the
fair market value of a share of the common stock on the date of purchase. Generally, all regular employees may participate in the
ESPP and may contribute, through payroll deductions, up to 15% of their earnings toward the purchase of common stock under the
ESPP. Under the terms of the ESPP, there are defined limitations as to the amount and value of common stock that can be purchased
by each employee.
The Company’s first offering period
ended in May 2016. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, employees purchased 176,592 shares of common stock pursuant
to the ESPP at a weighted-average exercise price of $5.11. As of September 30, 2016, 555,568 shares of common stock were reserved
for future issuance under the ESPP. The second offering period commenced in May 2016, with the same terms as the first offering
period.
For the three months ended September 30,
2016 and 2015, charges incurred under the ESPP totaled $294 and $158, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016
and 2015, charges incurred under the ESPP totaled $501 and $409, respectively.
There was $714 of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to purchase rights under the ESPP as of September 30, 2016. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of less than one year.
8. Net Loss per Common Share
Basic net loss per common share is computed
by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period.
Diluted net loss per common share is computed
by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period, adjusted to reflect potentially
dilutive securities. Potentially dilutive securities consist of incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock
options, restricted stock units, and warrants using the treasury stock method, and employee withholdings to purchase common stock
under the ESPP. Due to the net losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company had such potentially
dilutive securities outstanding which were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per common share, as the effects
would have been anti-dilutive. Accordingly, the basic and diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding are the
same for the following periods presented:
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(5,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,718
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,836
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted
|
|
|
33,458,212
|
|
|
|
32,138,214
|
|
|
|
33,184,814
|
|
|
|
31,807,776
|
|
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
The Company has excluded its outstanding
stock options, restricted stock units and warrants, as well as employee withholdings under the ESPP, from the calculation of diluted
net loss per common share during the periods in which such securities were anti-dilutive. The following table presents the total
weighted-average number of such securities during the periods presented:
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
43,782
|
|
|
|
43,782
|
|
|
|
43,782
|
|
|
|
87,738
|
|
Stock option awards
|
|
|
5,659,013
|
|
|
|
6,344,941
|
|
|
|
5,753,044
|
|
|
|
6,287,716
|
|
RSU awards
|
|
|
1,695,206
|
|
|
|
629,432
|
|
|
|
1,441,946
|
|
|
|
428,260
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
526,822
|
|
|
|
66,157
|
|
|
|
359,485
|
|
|
|
69,102
|
|
Total weighted-average anti-dilutive securities
|
|
|
7,924,823
|
|
|
|
7,084,312
|
|
|
|
7,598,257
|
|
|
|
6,872,816
|
|
9. Income Taxes
The Company’s interim and annual tax
provision is generally comprised of a deferred tax provision pertaining to basis differences in indefinite lived intangible assets
that cannot be offset by current year deferred tax assets, as well as, to a much lesser extent, a current tax provision for federal,
state, local and foreign taxes. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company calculated its full year 2016
estimated income tax provision and recorded the pro-rated tax provision in the quarters, referred to herein as the discrete method.
The Company concluded that it was within the exception under the interim tax accounting guidance, which requires the use of the
estimated Annual Effective Tax Rate (“AETR”) method, because the Company’s full year forecast of income before
taxes is at or near breakeven. Further, normal deviations in the projected full year income would result in disproportionate and
material changes to the interim tax provisions under the AETR method. During 2015, the Company recorded the interim tax provision
using the AETR method for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015 but determined during the quarter ended September
30, 2015 that the AETR method was no longer yielding a reliable interim tax provision and, accordingly, began using the discrete
method indicated above.
The Company’s deferred tax assets
relate primarily to net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and to a smaller extent stock based compensation and other
items. The Company has provided a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets to the extent the Company has determined that
it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax assets will not be realizable. In determining realizability, the Company
considered various factors including historical profitability and reversing temporary differences, exclusive of indefinite-lived
intangibles. The Company’s deferred tax liabilities arose primarily from basis differences in indefinite-lived intangible
assets that cannot be offset by current year deferred tax assets.
At December 31, 2015, the Company had approximately
$104,042 of NOL carryforwards available to offset future taxable income, which expire from 2024 through 2033. The full utilization
of these losses in the future is dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate taxable income and may also be limited
due to ownership changes, as defined under the provisions of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The
Company’s NOL carryforwards at December 31, 2015 included $7,517 of income tax deductions related to equity compensation
that are greater than the compensation recognized for financial reporting, which will be reflected as a credit to additional paid-in
capital as realized.
The Company is subject to taxation in the
U.S. and various federal, state, local and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is not subject to U.S. federal, state or non-U.S.
income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2010. However, to the extent U.S. federal and state NOL carryforwards
are utilized, the use of NOLs could be subject to examination by the tax authorities. The Company believes that it has appropriate
support for the income tax positions taken and to be taken on its tax returns and that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate
for all open years based on assessment of many factors, including past experience and interpretations of tax law. The Company regularly
assesses the adequacy of its income tax contingencies in accordance with the tax accounting guidance. As a result, the Company
may adjust its income tax contingency liabilities for the impact of new facts and developments, such as changes in interpretations
of relevant tax law and assessments from taxing authorities.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to certain claims
that have arisen in the ordinary conduct of business. Based on the advice of counsel and an assessment of the nature and status
of any potential claim, and taking into account any accruals the Company may have established for them, the Company currently believes
that any liabilities ultimately resulting from such claims will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
11. Subsequent Events
Merger Agreement
On October 21, 2016, the Company entered
into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Ziff Davis, LLC (“Parent”), Project
Echo Acquisition Corp., a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Purchaser”), and, solely for purposes of Section
9.11 thereof, j2 Global, Inc. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, Purchaser
commenced a tender offer on November 2, 2016 to purchase all of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company at a purchase
price of $10.50 per share in cash, without interest, subject to any withholding of taxes required by applicable law (the “Offer”).
The Merger Agreement provides, among other things, that, on the first business day after Purchaser accepts for payment and pays
for such number of shares validly tendered and not properly withdrawn pursuant to the Offer, subject to the satisfaction or waiver
of the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Purchaser will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”),
the separate existence of Purchaser will cease and the Company will continue as the surviving corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Parent.
The Board of Directors of the Company unanimously
approved the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer and the Merger.
The Offer is subject to the satisfaction
or waiver of a number of conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, including, among other things: (i) that the number of shares
validly tendered and not properly withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the Offer must represent at least one share more than
50% of the sum of (x) the total number of shares outstanding at the time of the expiration of the Offer plus (y) the aggregate
number of shares issuable to holders of the Company’s stock options from which the Company has received notices of exercise
prior to the expiration of the Offer (and as to which shares have not yet been issued to such exercising holders of stock options)
plus (z) the aggregate number of shares issuable upon the deemed exercise of any warrants pursuant to the Merger Agreement, and
(ii) the expiration or early termination of any applicable waiting period (and any extension thereof) under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended. The obligations of Parent and Purchaser to complete the Offer and the Merger are
not subject to any financing condition.
Additional information about the Merger
Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Offer and the Merger, is set forth in the Form 8-K filed with
the SEC on October 21, 2016 and the Schedule 14D-9 filed with the SEC on November 2, 2016.
Tea Leaves Purchase Agreement Amendment
On October 17, 2016, the Company entered
into a second amendment to the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement between the Company, Tea Leaves and the other parties thereto
(as amended, the “Purchase Agreement”). This amendment modified the terms of the potential earn-out payment, such that
the entire earn-out payment due to the former members of Tea Leaves, if earned, may be paid in cash at the Company’s election.
All other terms and conditions of the Purchase Agreement remained unchanged by the amendment.