ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
Contractual Arrangements and Corporate Structure
Zhangmen Education Inc. is a Cayman Islands
holding company. It conducts its operations in China through its PRC subsidiary and consolidated variable interest entity, or the
VIE. Current PRC laws and regulations restrict foreign investment in companies that engage in value-added telecommunication services
and certain other businesses. Therefore, we have, through our subsidiary, entered into a series of contractual arrangements, as
amended and restated, with the VIE as well as its shareholder. We are regarded as the primary beneficiary of the VIE for accounting
purposes and to consolidate its operating results in our financial statements under the U.S. GAAP, to the extent the conditions for
consolidation of the VIE under U.S. GAAP are satisfied. Nonetheless, The VIE is owned by the nominee shareholder, not us. The
nominee shareholder is also a beneficial owner of the Company. Investors in our ADSs are purchasing equity securities of a Cayman
Islands holding company rather than equity securities issued by our subsidiaries and the VIE. Investors who are non-PRC residents
may never directly hold equity interests in the VIE under current PRC laws and regulations. Neither such investors nor the holding
company itself have an equity ownership in, direct investment in, or control of, through such ownership or investment, the VIE. As
used in this annual report, “we,” “us,” “our company,” or “our,” refers to Zhangmen
Education Inc. and its subsidiaries, and, in the context of describing our consolidated financial information, business operations
and operating data, our consolidated VIE, “Shanghai Zhangda” refers to “Shanghai Zhangda Education Technology Co.,
Ltd.” We refer to Shanghai Zhangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. (“Shanghai Zhangxinrui”) as the PRC subsidiary in the
context of describing of its activities. We refer to Shanghai Zhangda as the VIE in the context of describing its activities and
contractual arrangements with us. The VIE conducts operations in China, and the VIE is not an entity in which we own equity, and our
Company does not conduct operations by ourselves. The following chart shows our corporate structure, including our principal
subsidiaries and VIE as of the date of this annual report.
The VIE structure involves unique risks to
investors in the ADSs. In 2020, 2021 and 2022, the amount of net revenues generated by the VIEs (including the Former VIEs)
accounted for 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively, of our total net revenues. As of December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, total assets of
the VIEs (including the Former VIEs), excluding amounts due from other companies in the Group, equaled to 34.9%, 26.8% and 82.5% of our consolidated total
assets as of the same dates, respectively. As of the date of this annual report, to our best knowledge, the contractual agreements
with the VIE have not been tested in court of law in the PRC. If the PRC government deems that the contractual agreements with the
VIE does not comply with PRC regulatory restrictions on foreign investment in the relevant industries, or if these regulations or
the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to material penalties or be forced to
relinquish our interests in those operations or otherwise significantly change our corporate structure. We and our investors face
significant uncertainty about potential future actions by the PRC government that could affect the legality and enforceability of
the contractual arrangements with the VIE and, consequently, significantly affect our ability to consolidate the financial results
of the VIE and the financial performance of our company as a whole. The PRC regulatory authorities could further disallow the VIE
structure, which would likely result in a material change in our operations and the value of our securities or could significantly
limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities
to significantly decline or be worthless. For a detailed discussion of the risk and uncertainties associated with the VIE structure,
see “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factor—Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure—There are
substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws, regulations, and rules
relating to the agreements that establish the VIE structure for our operations in China, including potential future actions by the
PRC government, which could affect the enforceability of our contractual arrangements with the VIE and, consequently, significantly
affect our financial condition and results of operations performance. If the PRC government finds that the agreements that establish
the structure for operating certain of our operations in China do not comply with PRC regulations relating to the relevant
industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to
severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations” and the other risk factors discussed under
“Risk Factors—Risks relating to Our Corporate Structure.”
We face significant regulatory, liquidity and
enforcement risks and uncertainties as a company based in and primarily operating in China, including risks and uncertainties regarding
that the rules and regulations in China can change quickly with little advance notice, which could result in a material change in our
operations and/or the value of our securities or could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer
securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. We also face risks associated
with recent statements and regulatory actions by the PRC government, including those related to the use of variable interest entities,
education and after-school tutoring, anti-monopoly regulatory actions, as well as cybersecurity and data privacy. In particular, our business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospect have been and may continue to be materially and adversely affected by the actions
we have taken to date and consider taking to be in compliance with the Alleviating Burden Opinion and other applicable PRC regulatory
requirements. We have historically generated a significant portion of our net revenues from the Academic AST Business. In order to fully
comply with applicable PRC regulatory requirements adopted by the PRC government in the second half of 2021, we have terminated our Academic
AST Business. In September 2022, we entered into a definitive share purchase agreement with Eternal Zenith, an entity controlled by Mr.
Jiajun Wu, a senior management member of the Company affiliated with our controlling shareholder. Pursuant to such share purchase agreement,
Mr. Jiajun Wu, through Eternal Zenith, would acquire all of our K-12 Business, for a nominal consideration. The disposal of the K-12 Business,
together with the accompanying internal reorganization, are crucial steps for us to fully comply with the latest PRC regulatory requirements.
We will continue to closely monitor the evolving regulatory environment and make efforts to seek guidance from and cooperate with the
government authorities to comply with the Alleviating Burden Opinion and other applicable PRC regulatory requirements. For details, see
“Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry—Our compliance with the
Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education and the implementation
measures issued by the relevant PRC government authorities has materially and adversely affected and may continue to affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospect” for detailed discussion.
The PRC government may also intervene with or
influence our operations at any time by adopting new laws and regulations as the government deems appropriate to further regulatory, political
and societal goals, or may exert more control over offerings conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers, which
could result in a material change in our operations and/or the value of the securities we have previously registered for sale. The PRC
government has recently published new policies that significantly affected certain industries such as the education and internet industries,
and we cannot rule out the possibility that it will in the future release regulations or policies regarding our industry that could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any such action, once taken by the PRC government, could significantly
limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to
significantly decline or be worthless. See “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business
in China—Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available
to you and us” for detailed discussion.
Contractual Arrangements with The VIE and The VIE’s Shareholder
Current PRC laws and
regulations impose certain restrictions or prohibitions on foreign ownership of companies that engage in value-added telecommunication
services and certain other businesses. We are an exempted company with limited liability incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Shanghai
Zhangxinrui is our PRC subsidiary and considered a foreign-invested enterprise (or WFOE) under PRC Laws. To comply with PRC laws and regulations,
we conduct our business in China through Shanghai Zhangda (or the VIE), based on a series of contractual arrangements by and among Shanghai
Zhangxinrui, the VIE and its shareholder.
Our contractual arrangements
with the VIE and its shareholder allow us to (i) be considered as the primary beneficiary of the VIE, (ii) receive substantially all of
the economic benefits of the VIE, and (iii) have an exclusive call option to purchase all or part of the equity interests in the VIE when
and to the extent permitted by PRC law.
As a result of our direct
ownership in Shanghai Zhangxinrui and the contractual arrangements with the VIE, we are regarded as the primary beneficiary of the VIE
for accounting purposes. We have consolidated the financial results of the VIE in our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with U.S. GAAP, to the extent the conditions for consolidation of the VIE under U.S. GAAP are satisfied.
The following
is a summary of the contractual arrangements by and among Shanghai Zhangxinrui, the VIE and its shareholder. For the complete text of
these contractual arrangements, please see the copies filed as exhibits to this annual report.
In
the opinion of Tian Yuan Law Firm, our PRC legal counsel, as of the date of this annual report and save for the uncertainties disclosed
in this annual report:
|
● |
the ownership structures of
the VIE and Shanghai Zhangxinrui in China are not in violation of applicable PRC laws and regulations currently in effect; and |
|
● |
the contractual arrangements between Shanghai Zhangxinrui,
the VIE and its shareholder governed by PRC law are valid, binding and enforceable, and will not result in any violation of applicable
PRC laws and regulations currently in effect. |
However,
our PRC legal counsel has also advised us that there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current
and future PRC laws, regulations and rules. Accordingly, the PRC regulatory authorities may take a view that is contrary to the opinion
of our PRC legal counsel. It is uncertain whether any new PRC laws or regulations relating to variable interest entity structures will
be adopted or if adopted, what they would provide. If we or the VIE is found to be in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or
regulations, or fail to obtain or maintain any of the required permits or approvals, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities would have
broad discretion to take action in dealing with such violations or failures. We have been further advised by our PRC legal counsel that
if the PRC government authorities find that the agreements that establish the structure for operating our value-added telecommunication
services and other business do not comply with PRC government restrictions on foreign investment in such businesses, we could be subject
to severe penalties including being prohibited from continuing operations. Additionally, these contractual arrangements may not be as
effective as direct ownership in providing us with effective control over the VIE. If the VIE or its shareholder fail to perform their
respective obligations under such contractual arrangements, we could be limited in our ability to enforce such contractual arrangements
in the PRC and may have to incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. We may also have to
rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and claiming damages, which we cannot
assure will be effective. Additionally, the ability of our PRC subsidiary to pay dividends to us is limited by certain PRC legal restrictions
on the payment of dividends by PRC companies and foreign exchange control, among others, which prevent us from having unfettered access
to our PRC subsidiary’s and VIE’s revenues. Our access to the VIE’s revenues is also limited since we do not have direct
ownership in the VIE and have to rely on the payment of service fees by the VIE to our PRC subsidiary. See “Item 3. Key Information—3.D.
Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure—If the PRC government finds that the agreements that establish the
structure for operating certain of our operations in China do not comply with PRC regulations relating to the relevant industries, or
if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be
forced to relinquish our interests in those operations,” “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating
to Our Corporate Structure—Our current corporate structure and business operations may be affected by the Foreign Investment Law
and its Implementation Rules” and “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business
in China—Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available
to you and us.”
Exclusive
Management Services and Business Cooperation Agreement
Under
the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreements, Shanghai Zhangxinrui has agreed to provide the following services
to Shanghai Zhangda:
|
● |
provide
or designate any third-party to provide, among other things, license of technology and software, development, maintenance and update
of relevant software, design, installation and daily management, maintenance and update of computer network systems, hardware equipment
and databases, development and test of new offerings, employee professional support and training services, market survey and research
services, enterprise management consulting, lease of facilities and property and other business and technological support as needed
to Shanghai Zhangda; |
|
● |
the licensing of technology
and software legally owned by Shanghai Zhangxinrui; |
|
● |
the development, maintenance
and update of software involved in Shanghai Zhangda; |
|
● |
the design, installation, daily
management, maintenance and updating of computer network systems, hardware equipment and databases of Shanghai Zhangda; |
|
● |
the development
and test of new offerings, employee professional support and training services of Shanghai Zhangda; |
|
● |
the assistance in consultancy,
collection and research of technology and market information (excluding market research business that wholly foreign-owned enterprises
are prohibited from conducting under PRC law); |
|
● |
the provision of market
survey and research services; |
|
● |
the provision of enterprise
management consulting; |
|
● |
the leasing of facilities
and property; and |
|
● |
other business and technological
support as needed to Shanghai Zhangda from time to time to the extent permitted under PRC law. |
Shanghai
Zhangda agrees to pay service fees to Shanghai Zhangxinrui in an amount equal to the income of Shanghai Zhangda, deducting necessary
costs and expenses acknowledged by Shanghai Zhangxinrui. Without
the prior written consent of Shanghai Zhangxinrui, Shanghai Zhangda cannot accept services provided by, or establish similar cooperation
relationship with, any third-party. Shanghai Zhangxinrui has the exclusive ownership of all intellectual property rights created as a
result of the performance of this agreement. The exclusive management services and business cooperation agreement has an indefinite term,
unless otherwise terminated by Shanghai Zhangxinrui in its sole discretion with 30 days’ prior written notice or pursuant to the
mandatory requirement under PRC laws or regulations. Under no circumstances can Shanghai Zhangda terminate the exclusive management services
and business cooperation agreement without the written consent of Shanghai Zhangxinrui.
Equity
Interest Pledge Agreement
In
September 2022, Shanghai Zhangxinrui, Shanghai Zhangda and the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda entered into an equity pledge agreement.
Pursuant to the equity pledge agreement, the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda pledged all of his equity interests of Shanghai Zhangda
to Shanghai Zhangxinrui as security for performance of the obligations of Shanghai Zhangda and the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda, under
the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreement, the exclusive option agreement and power of attorney. During the
term of the equity pledge agreement, Shanghai Zhangxinrui has the right to receive all of Shanghai Zhangda’s dividends and profits
distributed on the pledged equity. If any of the specified events of default occurs, Shanghai Zhangxinrui, as pledgee, will have the
right to auction or sell all or part of the pledged equity interests in Shanghai Zhangda and will have priority in receiving the proceeds
from such disposal. Shanghai Zhangxinrui may transfer all or any of its rights and obligations under the equity pledge agreement to its
designee(s) at any time. Shanghai Zhangda and its shareholder undertake that, without the prior written consent of Shanghai Zhangxinrui,
they will not transfer, or create or allow any encumbrance on the pledged equity interests. The agreement will remain in effect until
the fulfillment of all the obligations under the exclusive management services and business
cooperation agreement, the exclusive option agreement and power of attorney.
We have completed the
registration of the equity interest pledge under the equity pledge agreement in relation to Shanghai Zhangxinrui and Shanghai Zhangda
with the relevant office of the State Administration for Market Regulation in accordance with the PRC Civil Code.
Exclusive Option
Agreement
In September 2022, Shanghai
Zhangxinrui, Shanghai Zhangda and the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda entered into an exclusive option agreement. Under the exclusive
option agreement, the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda has irrevocably granted Shanghai Zhangxinrui an exclusive call option to purchase,
or designate a third-party to purchase, all or any part of his equity interests in Shanghai Zhangda at a purchase price equal to the higher
of (i) actual capital contribution, and (ii) the lowest price permissible by the then-applicable PRC laws and regulations. Shanghai Zhangda
has irrevocably granted Shanghai Zhangxinrui an exclusive call option to purchase, or designate a third-party to purchase, all or any
part of its assets, at a purchase price equal to the lowest price permissible by the then-applicable PRC laws and regulations. Shanghai
Zhangda and the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda covenant that, without Shanghai Zhangxinrui’s prior written consent, they will not,
among other things, (i) amend Shanghai Zhangda’s articles of association or change Shanghai Zhangda’s registered capital
or change its equity interests structure; (ii) cause Shanghai Zhangda to enter into any material contract to which Shanghai Zhangda
is a party, except in the ordinary course of business; (iii) allow Shanghai Zhangda to incur, inherit, guarantee or permit any debts,
except for those payables incurred in the ordinary or usual course of business or those disclosed to and agreed by Shanghai Zhangxinrui;
(iv) merge or consolidate Shanghai Zhangda with any other entity or acquire or invest in any other entity; (v) distribute any
dividend; (vi) sell, transfer, mortgage or otherwise dispose of any of Shanghai Zhangda’s assets or allow any encumbrance of
any assets; or (vii) terminate, liquidate or dissolve Shanghai Zhangda unless otherwise provided by PRC laws and regulations. The
shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda covenants that, without Shanghai Zhangxinrui’s prior written consent, he will not, among other things,
(i) create any pledge or encumbrance on the equity interests in Shanghai Zhangda; (ii) sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of
his equity interests in Shanghai Zhangda. The exclusive option agreement remains effective until all of the equity interests in or all
of the assets of Shanghai Zhangda are transferred to Shanghai Zhangxinrui or its designee(s) in the manner provided in the exclusive option
agreements. Under no circumstances can Shanghai Zhangda or its shareholder unilaterally terminate the exclusive option agreement unless
otherwise provided by mandatory PRC laws and regulations.
Powers of Attorney
In September 2022, the
shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda granted an irrevocable power of attorney. Pursuant to the power of attorney, the shareholder of Shanghai
Zhangda irrevocably authorized Shanghai Zhangxinrui or its designee(s) to act on his behalf as proxy attorney, to the extent permitted
by law, to exercise all rights of shareholder concerning all the equity interest held by the shareholder in Shanghai Zhangda, including
but not limited to proposing to convene or attend shareholders meetings, receiving any notice about the convening of the shareholders
meeting and related procedures, signing written resolutions, voting at such meetings, nominating and appointing directors and selling,
transferring, pledging or disposing of all the equity held in part or in whole, and exercising all other rights as shareholder. The power
of attorney issued by the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda will remain in force for so long as the shareholder remains a shareholder of
Shanghai Zhangda.
Spousal Consent
Letters
In September 2022, the
spouse of the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda signed a spousal consent letter. Pursuant to the consent letter, the spouse of the shareholder
of Shanghai Zhangda unconditionally and irrevocably agreed that the equity interest in Shanghai Zhangda held by and registered in the
name of such shareholder be disposed of in accordance with the power of attorney, the equity pledge agreement, and the exclusive option
agreement described above, and that such shareholder may perform, amend or terminate such agreements without any additional consent of
his spouse. Additionally, the signing spouse agreed not to assert any rights over the equity interest in Shanghai Zhangda held by the
shareholder. In addition, in the event that the signing spouse obtain any equity interest in Shanghai Zhangda held by the shareholder
for any reason, she agrees to be bound by and sign any legal documents substantially similar to the contractual arrangements described
above, as may be amended from time to time.
Recent Regulatory Development
Cybersecurity Review Measures
On January 4, 2022, the CAC published the Revised
Cybersecurity Review Measures, which became effective on February 15, 2022 and repealed the Cybersecurity Review Measures promulgated
on April 13, 2020. The Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures provide that a critical information infrastructure operator purchasing network
products and services, and platform operators carrying out data processing activities, which affect or may affect national security, shall
apply for cybersecurity review and that a platform operator with more than one million users’ personal information aiming to list
abroad must apply for cybersecurity review.
According to consultation with the competent government
authorities, under the currently effective PRC laws and regulations, a company that has been listed on a foreign stock exchange before
the promulgation of the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures is not required to go through a cybersecurity review by the CAC to conduct
a securities offering or to maintain its listing status on the foreign stock exchange on which its securities have been listed. Based
on the consultation, we believe that, under the currently effective PRC laws and regulations, we are not required to go through a cybersecurity
review by the CAC to conduct a security offering or maintain our trading status in the U.S and therefore, we believe the Cybersecurity
Review Measures do not have any material adverse impact on our operation and future security offering as of the date of this annual report.
However, there remain substantial uncertainties on the interpretation and implementations of the Cybersecurity Review Measures. If the
CSRC, the CAC or other regulatory agencies later require that we obtain their approvals for our future offshore offerings, we may be unable
to obtain such approvals in a timely manner, or at all, and such approvals may be rescinded even if obtained. Any such circumstance could
significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities
to significantly decline or be worthless. In addition, implementation of industry-wide regulations affecting our operations could limit
our ability to attract new customers and/or users and cause the value of our securities to significantly decline. Therefore, investors
of our company and our business face potential uncertainty from actions taken by the PRC government affecting our business.
As of the date of this annual report, we have
not been involved in any investigations or become subject to a cybersecurity review initiated by the CAC based on the Cybersecurity Review
Measures, and we have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, sanctions in such respect or any regulatory objections to our trading
status from the CAC.
CSRC Filing Required for Overseas
Listing and Securities Offerings
On July 6, 2021, certain PRC regulatory authorities
issued Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down on Illegal Securities Activities. These opinions call for strengthened regulation over illegal
securities activities and supervision on overseas listings by China-based companies and propose to take effective measures, such as promoting
the development of relevant regulatory systems to deal with the risks and incidents faced by China-based overseas-listed companies.
Moreover, on February 17, 2023, the CSRC released
the Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies, or the Overseas Listing Trial Measures,
and five supporting guidelines, which came into effect on March 31, 2023. Pursuant to the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, domestic companies
that seek to offer or list securities overseas, both directly and indirectly, should fulfill the filing procedure and report relevant
information to the CSRC. Domestic companies that have been listed on a foreign stock exchange prior to the effective date of the Overseas
Listing Trial Measures are not required to complete filing with the CSRC to maintain its listing status on the foreign stock exchange,
but are required to file with the CSRC within three working days after such domestic company completes a security offering on the foreign
stock exchange on which its securities have been listed. Since the Overseas Listing Trial Measures was newly promulgated, its interpretation,
application and enforcement remain unclear. If the filing procedure with the CSRC under the Overseas Listing Trial Measures is required
for any future offerings, listing or any other capital raising activities by us, it is uncertain whether we could complete the filing
procedure in a timely manner, or at all. We have been closely monitoring regulatory developments in China regarding any necessary approvals
from the CSRC, the CAC, or other PRC regulatory authorities required for overseas listings. As of the date of this annual report, we
have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, sanction or regulatory objection from the CSRC.
Permission Required from the PRC Authorities for Our Operations
and Overseas Securities Offerings
Except as disclosed in “Item 3. Key
Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry—We face uncertainties with respect to
the development of regulatory requirements on operating licenses and permits for our business operations in China. Failure to renew
and maintain requested licenses or permits in a timely manner or obtain newly required ones could have a material adverse impact on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.” and “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk
Factors—Risk Relating to Our Business and Industry—Our compliance with the Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of
Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education and the implementation measures issued by the relevant PRC
government authorities has materially and adversely affected and may continue to affect our business, financial condition, results
of operations and prospect,” as advised by Tian Yuan Law Firm, our PRC legal counsel, we believe our PRC subsidiary and the
VIE have obtained all licenses and permits from the PRC government authorities that are necessary for our material business
operations in China, including, among others, the Radio and Television Program Production Operating License, Publication Operating
License, Value-added Telecommunications Business Operating License and Internet Culture Operating License. Given the uncertainties
of interpretation and implementation of relevant laws and regulations and the enforcement practice by relevant government
authorities, we or the VIE may be required to obtain additional licenses, permits, filings, or approvals for the business operations
in the future. If we or the VIE is found to be in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations, or fail to obtain or
maintain any of the required permits or approvals, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities would have broad discretion to take
actions in dealing with such violations or failures. In addition, if we or the VIE had inadvertently concluded that such approvals,
permits, registrations or filings were not required, or if applicable laws, regulations or interpretations change in a way that
requires us or the VIE to obtain such approval, permits, registrations or filings in the future, we or the VIE may be unable to
obtain such necessary approvals, permits, registrations or filings in a timely manner, or at all, and such approvals, permits,
registrations or filings may be rescinded even if obtained. Any such circumstance may subject us or the VIE to fines and other
regulatory, civil or criminal liabilities, and we or the VIE may be ordered by the competent government authorities to suspend
relevant operations, which would materially and adversely affect our business operations. For risks relating to licenses and
approvals required for our operations in China, see “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to
Our Business and Industry.”
In addition, the PRC government has recently indicated
an intent to exert more oversight over overseas securities offerings and published a series of laws and regulations to regulate such transactions.
In connection with our prior overseas offerings and trading status in the U.S., as of the date of this annual report, we (i) have not
been required to obtain any permission from or complete any filing with the CSRC, and (ii) have not been required to go through a cybersecurity
review by the CAC.
However, there are substantial uncertainties as
to how PRC governmental authorities will regulate overseas listings, tradings and offerings in general and whether we are required to
complete any filing or obtain any specific regulatory approval from the CSRC, the CAC or any other PRC governmental authorities for our
future overseas securities offerings. If we had inadvertently concluded that such filings or approvals were not required, or if applicable
laws, regulations or interpretations change in a way that requires us to complete such filings or obtain such approvals in the future,
we may be unable to fulfill such requirements in a timely manner, or at all, and such approvals may be rescinded even if obtained. Any
such circumstance could subject us to penalties, including fines, suspension of business and revocation of required licenses, significantly
limit or completely hinder our ability to continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly
decline or be worthless. For more detailed information, see “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating
to Our Business and Industry—The approval, filing or other requirements of the China Securities Regulatory Commission or other PRC
government authorities may be required under PRC law in connection with our issuance of securities overseas or to maintain the trading
status of our ADSs, and if required, we cannot predict whether or for how long we will be able to obtain such approval or complete such
filing or other requirements.”
Transfer of Funds and Other Assets
Under relevant PRC laws and regulations, we are
permitted to remit funds to the VIE through loans rather than capital contributions. In 2020, 2021 and 2022, we did not make any loans
to the Former VIEs or VIE, as the case may be. The VIE funds its operations primarily using cash generated from operating and financing
activities and interest-free advances from Zhangmen group companies. For more information, see “Item 3. Key Information—Condensed
Consolidating Schedule,” and our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
The following diagram summarizes how funds were
transferred among Zhangmen Education Inc., our subsidiaries, VIE and the Former VIEs prior to our internal reorganization in 2022.
The following diagram summarizes how funds were
transferred among Zhangmen Education Inc., our subsidiary, and the VIE following our internal reorganization in 2022.
As of December 31, 2022, Zhangmen Education Inc.
had not made any cumulative capital contributions to our PRC subsidiary through intermediate holding company. As of December 31, 2022,
the net amount of interest-free advances due from the VIE to Zhangmen Education Inc. under certain collection and payment agreements entered
into during the ordinary course of business was RMB133.3 million (US$19.3 million).
In 2020 and 2021, the PRC subsidiaries
charged service fees including value added tax to the VIEs (including and the Former VIEs) for the certain service provided, which
amounted to RMB417.5 million and RMB1,162.4 million, respectively. In 2020 and 2021, the settlement of such service fees by the VIE
(including the Former VIEs) to our PRC subsidiaries amounted to RMB256.2 million and nil, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, the
outstanding balance of service fees payables from the VIEs (including the Former VIEs) to our PRC subsidiaries was RMB1,400.5 million. As of
December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance of interest-free advances payables from the VIEs (including the Former VIEs) to our PRC
subsidiaries was RMB681.9 million. There were no other assets transferred among the VIEs (including the Former VIEs) and non-VIEs in 2020 and
2021.
In 2022, there was no service provided or assets
transferred between the VIE and non-VIE.
As advised by our PRC legal advisor, for any amounts
owed by the VIE to our PRC subsidiary under the VIE agreements, unless otherwise required by PRC tax authorities, we are able to settle
such amounts under the current effective PRC laws and regulations, provided that the VIE have sufficient funds to do so. Our PRC subsidiary
ispermitted to pay dividends to their shareholders, and eventually to Zhangmen Education Inc., only out of their retained earnings, if
any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Such payment of dividends by entities registered in China
is subject to limitations, which could result in limitations on the availability of cash to fund dividends or make distributions to shareholders
of our securities. For example, our PRC subsidiary and the VIE are required to make appropriations to certain statutory reserve funds
or may make appropriations to certain discretionary funds, which are not distributable as cash dividends except in the event of a solvent
liquidation of the companies. For more details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing
Business in China—We may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiary to fund any cash and financing
requirements we may have, and any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiary to make payments to us could have a material and adverse
effect on our ability to conduct our business.” Zhangmen Education Inc. has not previously declared or paid any cash dividend or
dividend in kind, and has no plan to declare or pay any dividends in the near future on our shares or the ADSs representing our ordinary
shares. We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to operate and expand our business.
As of the date of this annual report, we do not have cash management policies in place that dictate how funds are transferred between
Zhangmen Education Inc., our subsidiaries, the VIE and the investors. Rather, the funds can be transferred in accordance with the applicable
PRC laws and regulations discussed in this section. See “Item 8.—Financial Information—8.A. Consolidated Statements
and Other Financial Information—Dividend Policy.”
For the purpose of illustration, the below table
reflects the hypothetical taxes that might be required to be paid within China, assuming that: (i) we have taxable earnings, and (ii)
we determine to pay a dividend in the future:
| |
Taxation Scenario(1) | |
| |
Statutory
Tax
and Standard Rates | |
Taxation Scenario | |
| 100 | % |
Tax on earnings at statutory rate of 25% | |
| -25 | % |
Net earnings available for distribution | |
| 75 | % |
Withholding tax at standard rate of 10%(2) | |
| -7.5 | % |
Net distribution to Parent/Shareholders | |
| 67.5 | % |
Notes:
(1) |
The tax calculation has been simplified for the purpose of this example. The hypothetical book pre-tax earnings amount, which does not consider timing differences, is assumed to equal the taxable income in the PRC. |
(2) |
China’s Enterprise Income Tax Law imposes a withholding income tax of 10% on dividends distributed by a FIE to its immediate holding company outside of China. A lower withholding income tax rate of 5% is applied if the FIE’s immediate holding company is registered in Hong Kong or other jurisdictions that have a tax treaty arrangement with China, subject to a qualification review at the time of the distribution. For the purpose of this hypothetical example, this table has been prepared based on a taxation scenario under which the full withholding tax would be applied. |
The table above has been prepared under the assumption
that all profits of the VIE will be distributed as fees to our PRC subsidiary under tax neutral contractual arrangements. If in the future,
the accumulated earnings of the VIE exceed the fees paid to our PRC subsidiary, or if the current and contemplated fee structure between
the intercompany entities is determined to be non-substantive and disallowed by Chinese tax authorities, we have other tax-planning strategies
that can be deployed on a tax neutral basis.
Should all tax planning strategies fail, the VIE
could, as a matter of last resort, make a non-deductible transfer to our PRC subsidiary for the amounts of the stranded cash in the VIE.
This would result in the double taxation of earnings: one at the VIE level (for non-deductible expenses) and one at the PRC subsidiary
level (for presumptive earnings on the transfer). Such a transfer and the related tax burdens would reduce our after-tax income to approximately
67.5% of the pre-tax income. Our management is of the view that the likelihood that this scenario would happen is remote.
Condensed Consolidating Schedule
The following tables present the condensed consolidating
schedules of financial information for Zhangmen Education Inc.
In the condensed consolidating schedules as of
and for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, “Zhangmen” refers to Zhangmen Education Inc., a Cayman Islands
exempted company. “VIEs” refers to Shanghai Zhangda Education Technology Co., Ltd. (“Zhangda”), Shanghai Zhangshi
Education and Training Co., Ltd. (“Zhangshi”) and Shenzhen Zhangmenren Education Consultation Co., Ltd. (“Zhangmenren”)
and its subsidiaries. “VIE” refers to Zhangda. “Former VIEs” refers to Zhangshi and Zhangmenren and its subsidiaries.
“WFOEs” refers to Zhangmen’s wholly-owned Chinese subsidiaries, Shanghai Zhangneng Information Technology Co., Ltd.
(“Zhangneng”) , Shanghai Zhangxue Education Technology Co., Ltd. (“Shanghai Zhangxue”), Shanghai Zhangxinrui
Technology Co., Ltd. (“Shanghai Zhangxinrui”) and their subsidiaries. “Other subsidiary” refers
to Global Online Education HK Limited (“GOE HK”), which is a Hong Kong company and a 100% subsidiary owned by Zhangmen
Education Inc. “Other subsidiaries” refers to GOE HK and Zhangmen Technology HK Limited (“Zhangmen HK”),
both are Hong Kong companies and 100% subsidiaries owned by Zhangmen Education Inc.
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 | |
| |
Zhangmen | | |
WFOEs | | |
Other Subsidiary | | |
VIEs | | |
Eliminations | | |
Consolidated | |
| |
(RMB in thousands) | |
Revenue | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 215,750 | | |
| - | | |
| 215,750 | |
Cost of revenue | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (114,343 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (114,343 | ) |
Operating expenses | |
| (27,974 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (374,951 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (402,925 | ) |
Loss from operations | |
| (27,974 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (273,544 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (301,518 | ) |
Interest income, net | |
| 19,764 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 19,764 | |
Other income, net | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 479 | | |
| - | | |
| 479 | |
Fair value change of investments and derivatives | |
| 3,696 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 3,696 | |
Loss from investments in subsidiaries and VIE(1) | |
| (273,065 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 273,065 | | |
| - | |
Loss before provision for income tax | |
| (277,579 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (273,065 | ) | |
| 273,065 | | |
| (277,579 | ) |
Income tax expenses | |
| (2,883 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (2,883 | ) |
Net loss from continuing operations | |
| (280,462 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (273,065 | ) | |
| 273,065 | | |
| (280,462 | ) |
Deemed dividend | |
| (101,795 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (101,795 | ) |
Accretion of convertible redeemable preferred shares and redeemable ordinary shares | |
| (837,856 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (837,856 | ) |
Net loss from continuing operations available to ordinary shareholders of Zhangmen Education Inc. | |
| (1,220,113 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (273,065 | ) | |
| 273,065 | | |
| (1,220,113 | ) |
Loss from investments in disposal subsidiaries, former VIEs and former VIEs’ subsidiaries(1) | |
| (731,884 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 731,884 | | |
| - | |
Net (loss) income related to discontinued operations | |
| - | | |
| (629,783 | ) | |
| 40,000 | | |
| (142,101 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (731,884 | ) |
Net (loss) income available to ordinary shareholders of Zhangmen Education Inc. | |
| (1,951,997 | ) | |
| (629,783 | ) | |
| 40,000 | | |
| (415,166 | ) | |
| 1,004,949 | | |
| (1,951,997 | ) |
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 | |
| |
Zhangmen | | |
WFOEs | | |
Other Subsidiary | | |
VIEs | | |
Eliminations | | |
Consolidated | |
| |
| | |
| | |
(RMB in thousands) | | |
| | |
| |
Revenue | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 299,296 | | |
| - | | |
| 299,296 | |
Cost of revenue | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (137,503 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (137,503 | ) |
Operating expenses | |
| (70,069 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (356,816 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (426,885 | ) |
Loss from operations | |
| (70,069 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (195,023 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (265,092 | ) |
Interest income (expenses), net | |
| 3,016 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (28 | ) | |
| - | | |
| 2,988 | |
Other (expenses) income, net | |
| (7,372 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 30 | | |
| - | | |
| (7,342 | ) |
Fair value change of investments and derivatives | |
| 5,205 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 5,205 | |
Loss from investments in subsidiaries and VIE(1) | |
| (195,021 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 195,021 | | |
| - | |
Loss before provision for income tax | |
| (264,241 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (195,021 | ) | |
| 195,021 | | |
| (264,241 | ) |
Income tax expenses | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Net loss from continuing operations | |
| (264,241 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (195,021 | ) | |
| 195,021 | | |
| (264,241 | ) |
Accretion of convertible redeemable preferred shares and redeemable ordinary shares | |
| (2,217,489 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (2,217,489 | ) |
Net loss from continuing operations available to ordinary shareholders of Zhangmen Education Inc. | |
| (2,481,730 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (195,021 | ) | |
| 195,021 | | |
| (2,481,730 | ) |
Loss from investments in disposal subsidiaries, former VIEs and former VIEs’ subsidiaries(1) | |
| (912,879 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 912,879 | | |
| - | |
Net (loss) income related to discontinued operations | |
| - | | |
| (396,503 | ) | |
| 36,283 | | |
| (552,659 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (912,879 | ) |
Net (loss) income available to ordinary shareholders of Zhangmen Education Inc. | |
| (3,394,609 | ) | |
| (396,503 | ) | |
| 36,283 | | |
| (747,680 | ) | |
| 1,107,900 | | |
| (3,394,609 | ) |
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 | |
| |
Zhangmen | | |
WFOEs | | |
Other Subsidiaries | | |
VIEs | | |
Eliminations | | |
Consolidated | |
| |
| | |
| | |
(RMB in thousands) | | |
| | |
| |
Revenue | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 97,366 | | |
| - | | |
| 97,366 | |
Cost of revenue | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (39,410 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (39,410 | ) |
Operating expenses | |
| (22,412 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (134,526 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (156,938 | ) |
Loss from operations | |
| (22,412 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (76,570 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (98,982 | ) |
Interest income, net | |
| 305 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 595 | | |
| - | | |
| 900 | |
Other income, net | |
| 168 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 76 | | |
| - | | |
| 244 | |
Loss from investments in subsidiaries and VIE(1) | |
| (75,899 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 75,899 | | |
| - | |
Loss before provision for income tax | |
| (97,838 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (75,899 | ) | |
| 75,899 | | |
| (97,838 | ) |
Income tax expenses | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Net loss from continuing operations | |
| (97,838 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (75,899 | ) | |
| 75,899 | | |
| (97,838 | ) |
Net loss from continuing operations available to ordinary shareholders of Zhangmen Education Inc. | |
| (97,838 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (75,899 | ) | |
| 75,899 | | |
| (97,838 | ) |
Income from investments in disposal subsidiaries, former VIEs and former VIEs’ subsidiaries(1) | |
| 467,510 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (467,510 | ) | |
| - | |
Net income (loss) related to
discontinued operations | |
| 355,278 | | |
| (317,790 | ) | |
| (1,145,948 | ) | |
| 2,286,526 | | |
| (355,278 | ) | |
| 822,788 | |
Net income (loss) available to ordinary shareholders of Zhangmen Education Inc. | |
| 724,950 | | |
| (317,790 | ) | |
| (1,145,948 | ) | |
| 2,210,627 | | |
| (746,889 | ) | |
| 724,950 | |
Note:
(1) |
The eliminations are mainly related to the investment loss picked up from subsidiaries, VIEs and VIE’s subsidiaries. |
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 | |
| |
Zhangmen | | |
WFOEs | | |
Other Subsidiary | | |
VIEs | | |
Eliminations | | |
Consolidated | |
| |
(RMB in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
| 962 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 37,453 | | |
| - | | |
| 38,415 | |
Short-term investments | |
| 2,109,629 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 2,109,629 | |
Amounts due from Zhangmen Group Companies (1) | |
| - | | |
| 292,954 | | |
| 3,569 | | |
| 367,340 | | |
| (663,863 | ) | |
| - | |
Assets of disposal group | |
| - | | |
| 551,921 | | |
| 1,500,015 | | |
| 1,838,879 | | |
| (625,269 | ) | |
| 3,265,546 | |
Other assets | |
| 52 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 16,693 | | |
| - | | |
| 16,745 | |
Total assets | |
| 2,110,643 | | |
| 844,875 | | |
| 1,503,584 | | |
| 2,260,365 | | |
| (1,289,132 | ) | |
| 5,430,335 | |
Amounts due to Zhangmen Group Companies (1) | |
| - | | |
| 370,909 | | |
| - | | |
| 292,954 | | |
| (663,863 | ) | |
| - | |
Deferred revenue, current | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 179,189 | | |
| - | | |
| 179,189 | |
Refund liabilities | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 39,258 | | |
| - | | |
| 39,258 | |
Deficits of investments in subsidiaries and consolidated VIEs(2) | |
| 2,313,126 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (2,313,126 | ) | |
| - | |
Liabilities of disposal group | |
| - | | |
| 363,801 | | |
| 20,916 | | |
| 4,918,811 | | |
| - | | |
| 5,303,528 | |
Deferred revenue, non-current | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 74,855 | | |
| - | | |
| 74,855 | |
Other liabilities | |
| 17,840 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 35,988 | | |
| - | | |
| 53,828 | |
Total liabilities | |
| 2,330,966 | | |
| 734,710 | | |
| 20,916 | | |
| 5,541,055 | | |
| (2,976,989 | ) | |
| 5,650,658 | |
Total mezzanine equity and shareholders’ (deficit) equity | |
| (220,323 | ) | |
| 110,165 | | |
| 1,482,668 | | |
| (3,280,690 | ) | |
| 1,687,857 | | |
| (220,323 | ) |
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 | |
| |
Zhangmen | | |
WFOEs | | |
Other Subsidiary | | |
VIEs | | |
Eliminations | | |
Consolidated | |
| |
(RMB in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
| 1,124 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 334,557 | | |
| - | | |
| 335,681 | |
Short-term investments | |
| 63,757 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 63,757 | |
Amounts due from Zhangmen Group Companies (1) | |
| - | | |
| 2,082,352 | | |
| 517,210 | | |
| 588,783 | | |
| (3,188,345 | ) | |
| - | |
Assets of disposal group | |
| - | | |
| 505,398 | | |
| 1,939,437 | | |
| 338,808 | | |
| (660,859 | ) | |
| 2,122,784 | |
Other assets | |
| 553 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 4,281 | | |
| - | | |
| 4,834 | |
Total assets | |
| 65,434 | | |
| 2,587,750 | | |
| 2,456,647 | | |
| 1,266,429 | | |
| (3,849,204 | ) | |
| 2,527,056 | |
Amounts due to Zhangmen Group Companies (1) | |
| 4,213 | | |
| 1,101,495 | | |
| - | | |
| 2,082,637 | | |
| (3,188,345 | ) | |
| - | |
Deferred revenue | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 76,380 | | |
| - | | |
| 76,380 | |
Refund liabilities | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 64,592 | | |
| - | | |
| 64,592 | |
Deficits of investments in subsidiaries and consolidated VIEs(2) | |
| 908,253 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (908,253 | ) | |
| - | |
Liabilities of disposal group | |
| - | | |
| 174,632 | | |
| 2,776 | | |
| 3,043,062 | | |
| - | | |
| 3,220,470 | |
Other liabilities | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 12,646 | | |
| - | | |
| 12,646 | |
Total liabilities | |
| 912,466 | | |
| 1,276,127 | | |
| 2,776 | | |
| 5,279,317 | | |
| (4,096,598 | ) | |
| 3,374,088 | |
Total shareholders’ (deficit) equity | |
| (847,032 | ) | |
| 1,311,623 | | |
| 2,453,871 | | |
| (4,012,888 | ) | |
| 247,394 | | |
| (847,032 | ) |
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 | |
| |
Zhangmen | | |
WFOEs | | |
Other Subsidiaries | | |
VIEs | | |
Eliminations | | |
Consolidated | |
| |
(RMB in thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
| 6,464 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 125,444 | | |
| - | | |
| 131,908 | |
Short-term investments | |
| 20,894 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 20,894 | |
Amounts due from Zhangmen Group Companies(1) | |
| 133,264 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (133,264 | ) | |
| - | |
Other assets | |
| 34 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 3,669 | | |
| - | | |
| 3,703 | |
Total assets | |
| 160,656 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 129,113 | | |
| (133,264 | ) | |
| 156,505 | |
Amounts due to Zhangmen Group Companies(1) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 133,264 | | |
| (133,264 | ) | |
| - | |
Deficits of investments in subsidiaries and VIE(2) | |
| 83,900 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (83,900 | ) | |
| - | |
Deferred revenue | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 33,508 | | |
| - | | |
| 33,508 | |
Refund liabilities | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 15,688 | | |
| - | | |
| 15,688 | |
Other liabilities | |
| 188 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 30,553 | | |
| | | |
| 30,741 | |
Total liabilities | |
| 84,088 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 213,013 | | |
| (217,164 | ) | |
| 79,937 | |
Total shareholders’ equity (deficit) | |
| 76,568 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (83,900 | ) | |
| 83,900 | | |
| 76,568 | |
Notes:
(1) | The eliminations are
mainly related to the unpaid balance of service fees between WFOEs and VIEs and other interest-free
advances from/to the VIE(s). |
(2) | The eliminations are
mainly related to the investments to subsidiaries and VIEs. |
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 | |
| |
Zhangmen | | |
WFOEs | | |
Other Subsidiary | | |
VIEs | | |
Eliminations | | |
Consolidated | |
| |
(RMB in thousands) | |
Net cash generated from (used in) continuing operating activities | |
| 744 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (142,305 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (141,561 | ) |
Net cash (used in) generated from discontinued operating activities | |
| - | | |
| (566,404 | ) | |
| 484,190 | | |
| 568,060 | | |
| - | | |
| 485,846 | |
Net cash generated from (used in) operating activities | |
| 744 | | |
| (566,404 | ) | |
| 484,190 | | |
| 425,755 | | |
| - | | |
| 344,285 | |
Net cash (used in) generated from continuing investing activities(1) | |
| (2,193,891 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 117,955 | | |
| - | | |
| (2,075,936 | ) |
Net cash used in discontinued investing activities | |
| - | | |
| (363,049 | ) | |
| (705,154 | ) | |
| (348,218 | ) | |
| 698,128 | | |
| (718,293 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | |
| (2,193,891 | ) | |
| (363,049 | ) | |
| (705,154 | ) | |
| (230,263 | ) | |
| 698,128 | | |
| (2,794,229 | ) |
Net cash generated from financing continuing activities(1) | |
| 1,716,310 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,716,310 | |
Net cash generated from (used in) discontinued financing activities | |
| - | | |
| 641,896 | | |
| 56,232 | | |
| (2,025 | ) | |
| (698,128 | ) | |
| (2,025 | ) |
Net cash generated from (used in) financing activities(1) | |
| 1,716,310 | | |
| 641,896 | | |
| 56,232 | | |
| (2,025 | ) | |
| (698,128 | ) | |
| 1,714,285 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes | |
| (168,115 | ) | |
| - | | |
| 62,932 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (105,183 | ) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | |
| (644,952 | ) | |
| (287,557 | ) | |
| (101,800 | ) | |
| 193,467 | | |
| - | | |
| (840,842 | ) |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of the year | |
| 645,914 | | |
| 295,085 | | |
| 244,561 | | |
| 487,531 | | |
| - | | |
| 1,673,091 | |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of the year | |
| 962 | | |
| 7,528 | | |
| 142,761 | | |
| 680,998 | | |
| - | | |
| 832,249 | |
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 | |
| |
Zhangmen | | |
WFOEs | | |
Other Subsidiary | | |
VIEs | | |
Eliminations | | |
Consolidated | |
| |
(RMB in thousands) | |
Net cash used in continuing operating activities | |
| (72,690 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (325,600 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (398,290 | ) |
Net cash (used in) generated from
discontinued operating activities | |
| - | | |
| (443,974 | ) | |
| 3,961 | | |
| (2,260,442 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (2,700,455 | ) |
Net cash (used
in) generated from operating activities | |
| (72,690 | ) | |
| (443,974 | ) | |
| 3,961 | | |
| (2,586,042 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (3,098,745 | ) |
Net cash (used in) generated from continuing investing
activities(1) | |
| (478,881 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 666,282 | | |
| - | | |
| 187,401 | |
Net cash generated from discontinued
investing activities | |
| - | | |
| 334,332 | | |
| 832,939 | | |
| 76,900 | | |
| 2,480,746 | | |
| 3,724,917 | |
Net cash (used
in) generated from investing activities | |
| (478,881 | ) | |
| 334,332 | | |
| 832,939 | | |
| 743,182 | | |
| 2,480,746 | | |
| 3,912,318 | |
Net cash generated from continuing financing
activities(1) | |
| 560,842 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 380 | | |
| - | | |
| 561,222 | |
Net cash generated from discontinued
financing activities | |
| - | | |
| 539,150 | | |
| 345,903 | | |
| 1,583,339 | | |
| (2,480,746 | ) | |
| (12,354 | ) |
Net cash
generated from financing activities(1) | |
| 560,842 | | |
| 539,150 | | |
| 345,903 | | |
| 1,583,719 | | |
| (2,480,746 | ) | |
| 548,868 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes | |
| (9,109 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (47,634 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (56,743 | ) |
Net increase
(decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | |
| 162 | | |
| 429,508 | | |
| 1,135,169 | | |
| (259,141 | ) | |
| - | | |
| 1,305,698 | |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted
cash at beginning of the year | |
| 962 | | |
| 7,528 | | |
| 142,761 | | |
| 680,998 | | |
| - | | |
| 832,249 | |
Cash, cash equivalents
and restricted cash at end of the year | |
| 1,124 | | |
| 437,036 | | |
| 1,277,930 | | |
| 421,857 | | |
| - | | |
| 2,137,947 | |
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022 | |
| |
Zhangmen | | |
WFOEs | | |
Other Subsidiaries | | |
VIEs | | |
Eliminations | | |
Consolidated | |
| |
(RMB in thousands) | |
Net cash used in continuing operating activities | |
| (16,260 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (144,992 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (161,252 | ) |
Net cash used in discontinued operating
activities | |
| - | | |
| (263,620 | ) | |
| (123,423 | ) | |
| (427,476 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (814,519 | ) |
Net cash used
in operating activities | |
| (16,260 | ) | |
| (263,620 | ) | |
| (123,423 | ) | |
| (572,468 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (975,771 | ) |
Net cash generated from continuing
investing activities(1) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 42,863 | | |
| - | | |
| 42,863 | |
Net cash used in discontinued investing
activities | |
| (24,212 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (1,248,718 | ) | |
| (1,005,787 | ) | |
| 1,065,563 | | |
| (1,213,154 | ) |
Net cash used
in investing activities | |
| (24,212 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (1,248,718 | ) | |
| (962,924 | ) | |
| 1,065,563 | | |
| (1,170,291 | ) |
Net cash generated from
continuing financing activities | |
| 26 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 26 | |
Net cash (used in) generated from
discontinued financing activities | |
| - | | |
| (173,416 | ) | |
| - | | |
| 1,238,979 | | |
| (1,065,563 | ) | |
| - | |
Net cash
generated from (used in) financing activities | |
| 26 | | |
| (173,416 | ) | |
| - | | |
| 1,238,979 | | |
| (1,065,563 | ) | |
| 26 | |
Effect of exchange rate changes | |
| 45,786 | | |
| - | | |
| 94,211 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 139,997 | |
Net increase
(decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | |
| 5,340 | | |
| (437,036 | ) | |
| (1,277,930 | ) | |
| (296,413 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (2,006,039 | ) |
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted
cash at beginning of the year | |
| 1,124 | | |
| 437,036 | | |
| 1,277,930 | | |
| 421,857 | | |
| - | | |
| 2,137,947 | |
Cash, cash equivalents
and restricted cash at end of the year | |
| 6,464 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 125,444 | | |
| - | | |
| 131,908 | |
Note:
(1) | The eliminations are
mainly related to working capital from Zhangmen to its subsidiaries and the VIEs, and other
interest-free advances from/to Zhangmen to its subsidiaries and the VIEs. |
Restrictions on Foreign Exchange and the Ability
to Transfer Cash between Entities, Across Borders and to U.S. Investors
In the future, if and
when we become profitable, Zhangmen Education Inc.’s ability to pay dividends, if any, to its shareholders and ADS holders and
to service any debt it may incur will depend upon dividends paid by our PRC subsidiary. Under PRC laws and regulations, our PRC subsidiary
are subject to certain restrictions with respect to paying dividends or otherwise transferring any of their net assets offshore to Zhangmen
Education Inc. In particular, under the current effective PRC laws and regulations, dividends may be paid only out of distributable profits.
Distributable profits are the net profit as determined under PRC GAAP, less any recovery of accumulated losses and appropriations to
statutory and other reserves required to be made. Each of our PRC subsidiary is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits
each year, after making up previous years’ accumulated losses, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds, until the aggregate
amount of such a fund reaches 50% of its registered capital. As a result, our PRC subsidiary may not have sufficient distributable profits
to pay dividends to us in the near future.
Furthermore, if certain
procedural requirements are satisfied, the payment of current account items, including profit distributions and trade and service related
foreign exchange transactions, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from State Administration of Foreign Exchange
(the “SAFE”) or its local branches. However, where RMB is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China
to pay capital expenses, such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies, approval from or registration with competent
government authorities or its authorized banks is required. The PRC government may take measures at its discretion from time to time
to restrict access to foreign currencies for current account or capital account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system
prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends
in foreign currencies to our offshore intermediary holding companies or ultimate parent company, and therefore, our shareholders or investors
in our ADSs. Further, we cannot assure you that new regulations or policies will not be promulgated in the future, which may further
restrict the remittance of RMB into or out of the PRC. We cannot assure you, in light of the restrictions in place, or any amendment
to be made from time to time, that our current or future PRC subsidiary will be able to satisfy their respective payment obligations
that are denominated in foreign currencies, including the remittance of dividends outside of the PRC. If any of our subsidiaries incurs
debt on its own behalf in the future, the instruments governing such debt may restrict its ability to pay dividends to Zhangmen Education
Inc. In addition, our PRC subsidiary are required to make appropriations to certain statutory reserve funds, which are not distributable
as cash dividends except in the event of a solvent liquidation of the companies.
For PRC and United States
federal income tax consideration of an investment in the ADSs, see “Item 10. Additional Information—10.E. Taxation.”
Implication of the Holding Foreign Companies
Accountable Act
Trading in our securities
on U.S. markets, including the OTC market, may be prohibited under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (the “HFCAA”)
if the PCAOB determines that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely our auditor for two consecutive years. On December 16,
2021, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) issued the HFCAA Determination Report to notify the SEC
of its determinations that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered
in mainland China and Hong Kong (the “2021 Determinations”). As of the date of this annual report, our auditor is not included
in the report. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it was able to conduct inspections and investigations completely of PCAOB-registered
public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong in 2022. The PCAOB vacated its previous 2021 Determinations accordingly.
As a result, we do not expect to be identified as a “Commission-Identified Issuer” under the HFCAA for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2022 after we file our annual report on Form 20-F for such fiscal year. However, whether the PCAOB will continue to conduct
inspections and investigations completely to its satisfaction of PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China
and Hong Kong is subject to uncertainty and depends on a number of factors out of our, and our auditor’s, control, including positions
taken by authorities of the PRC. The PCAOB is expected to continue to demand complete access to inspections and investigations against
accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong in the future and states that it has already made plans to resume regular
inspections in early 2023 and beyond. The PCAOB is required under the HFCAA to make its determination on an annual basis with regards
to its ability to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms based in the mainland China and Hong Kong. The possibility of being
a “Commission-Identified Issuer” could continue to adversely affect the trading price of our securities.
Should the PCAOB again encounter impediments to inspections and investigations in mainland China or Hong Kong as a result of positions
taken by any authority in either jurisdiction, the PCAOB will make determinations under the HFCAA as and when appropriate. For details,
see “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China—The PCAOB had historically been unable to inspect our former
auditor in relation to their audit work performed for our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, which is
included elsewhere in this annual report. Recent developments with respect to audits of China-based companies may still also create uncertainty
about the ability of our current auditor to fully cooperate with the PCAOB’s inspection requests without the approval of the relevant
PRC authorities.”
3.A. [Reserved]
3.B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
3.C. Reason for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
3.D. Risk Factors
We face significant
regulatory, liquidity and enforcement risks and uncertainties as a company based in and primarily operating in China, including risks
and uncertainties regarding that the rules and regulations in China can change quickly with little advance notice, which could result
in a material change in our operations and/or the value of our securities or could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability
to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.
The PRC government may also intervene with or influence our operations at any time by adopting new laws and regulations as the government
deems appropriate to further regulatory, political and societal goals, or may exert more control over offerings conducted overseas and/or
foreign investment in China-based issuers, which could result in a material change in our operations and/or the value of the securities
we have previously registered for sale. We also face risks associated with recent statements and regulatory actions by the PRC government,
including those related to the use of variable interest entities, education and after-school tutoring, anti-monopoly regulatory actions,
as well as cybersecurity and data privacy.
You should carefully
consider all of the information in this annual report before making an investment in the ADSs. Below please find a summary of the principal
risks and uncertainties we face, organized under relevant headings. The operational risks associated with being based in and having operations
in mainland China also apply to operations in Hong Kong and Macau. While entities and businesses in Hong Kong and Macau operate under
different sets of laws from mainland China, the legal risks associated with being based in and having operations in mainland China could
apply to a company’s operations in Hong Kong and Macau, if the laws applicable to mainland China become applicable to entities
and business in Hong Kong and Macau in the future. As of the date of this Annual Report, we do not have operations in Hong Kong or Macau.
In particular, as we are a China-based company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, you should pay special attention to subsections headed
“Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China” and “Item 3. Key
Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure.”
Below please find a summary of the principal
risks we face, organized under relevant headings.
Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry
Risks and uncertainties
relating to our business and industry include, but are not limited to, the following:
| ● | Risks
associated with changes in our business strategies and offerings. For details, see “Item
3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks relating to Our Business and Industry—The
significant and ongoing changes in our business strategies and offerings may make it difficult
to evaluate our future prospects” on page 24 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks
associated with our compliance with the Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework
and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education and the implementation measures.
For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks relating
to Our Business and Industry—Our compliance with the Opinions on Further Alleviating
the Burden of Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education and
the implementation measures issued by the relevant PRC government authorities has materially
and adversely affected and may continue to affect our business, financial condition, results
of operations and prospect” on pages 25 to 26 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
our ability to continue to attract students to purchase our courses and to increase the spending
of our students. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks
relating to Our Business and Industry—If we are not able to continue to attract students
to purchase our courses and to increase the spending of our students, our business and prospects
will be materially and adversely affected” on page 26 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
our ability to maintain consistent quality or timely develop our educational content in a
cost-effective manner. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks
relating to Our Business and Industry—If we are unable to maintain consistent quality
or timely develop our educational content in a cost-effective manner to make them appealing
to existing and prospective students, our business and reputation may be materially and adversely
affected” on page 27 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
our ability to maintain and enhance the recognition of our brand. For details, see “Item
3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks relating to Our Business and Industry—Our
business depends on the continued success of our brand, and if we fail to maintain and enhance
the recognition of our brand, we may face difficulty attracting students to our STEAM courses, and our reputation and operating results may be harmed” on see page 27
of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
the significant competition we faced. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks relating to Our Business and Industry—We face significant
competition, which could increase our customer acquisition cost, cause us to lose students
to our competitors, lead to pricing pressure and loss of market shares, and significantly
reduce our net revenues” on page 28 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
our ability to continue to recruit, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified teachers.
For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks relating
to Our Business and Industry—If we are not able to continue to recruit, train and retain
a sufficient number of qualified teachers, our business, financial conditions and operating
results may be materially and adversely affected” on pages 28 and 29 of this
annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
students discontinuing taking our courses. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks relating to Our Business and Industry—Students may decide
not to continue taking our courses for a number of reasons, including a perceived lack of
improvement in their academic performance or general dissatisfaction with our courses, which
may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and reputation”
on see page 29 of this annual report. |
| ● | Uncertainties with
respect to the development of regulatory requirements on operating licenses and permits for
our business operations in China. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks relating to Our Business and Industry—We face uncertainties
with respect to the development of regulatory requirements on operating licenses and permits
for our business operations in China. Failure to renew and maintain requested licenses or
permits in a timely manner or obtain newly required ones due to adverse changes in regulations
or policies could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and
results of operations” on pages 29 and 30 of this annual report. |
Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure
Risks and uncertainties relating to our corporate
structure include, but are not limited to, the following:
| ● | Substantial uncertainties
regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws, regulations,
and rules relating to the agreements that establish the VIE structure for our operations
in China. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks
relating to Our Corporate Structure—There are substantial uncertainties regarding the
interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws, regulations, and rules relating
to the agreements that establish the VIE structure for our operations in China, including
potential future actions by the PRC government, which could affect the enforceability of
our contractual arrangements with the VIE and, consequently, significantly affect our financial
condition and results of operations performance. If the PRC government finds that the agreements
that establish the structure for operating certain of our operations in China do not comply
with PRC regulations relating to the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the
interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to severe
penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations” on pages 48
and 49 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
our reliance on contractual arrangements with the VIE and its shareholder for our business
operations. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information— D. Risk Factors—Risks
relating to Our Corporate Structure—We rely on contractual arrangements with the VIE
and its shareholder for our business operations, which may not be as effective as direct
ownership in providing operational control” on page 49 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
failure by the VIE or its shareholder to perform their obligations under our contractual
arrangements with them. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks
relating to Our Corporate Structure—Any failure by the VIE or its shareholder to perform
their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material and
adverse effect on our business” on page 50 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
the actual or potential conflicts of interest between the shareholder of the VIE and us.
For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks relating
to Our Corporate Structure—The shareholder of the VIE may have actual or potential
conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business and
financial condition” on page 50 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
the contractual arrangements in relation to the VIE being subject to scrutiny by the PRC
tax authorities. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks
relating to Our Corporate Structure—Contractual arrangements in relation to the VIE
may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and they may determine that we or our
PRC consolidated variable interest entities owe additional taxes, which could negatively
affect our financial condition and the value of your investmen” on page 51 of this
annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
our current corporate structure and business operations being affected by the Foreign Investment
Law and its Implementation Rules. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks relating to Our Corporate Structure—Our current corporate
structure and business operations may be affected by the Foreign Investment Law and its Implementation
Rules” on page 51 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
our inability to use and enjoy assets held by the VIE that are material to the operation
of certain portion of our business. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks relating to Our Corporate Structure—We may lose the ability
to use and enjoy assets held by the VIE that are material to the operation of certain portion
of our business if the entities go bankrupt or become subject to a dissolution or liquidation
proceeding” on page 52 of this annual report. |
Risks Relating to Doing Business in China
We are also subject to risks and uncertainties
relating to doing business in China in general, including, but are not limited to, the following:
| ● | Risks associated with
failure to obtain the approval, filing or other requirements of the China Securities Regulatory
Commission or other PRC government authorities in connection with the issuance of securities
overseas or maintenance of the trading status of our ADSs. For details, see “Item 3.
Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks relating to Doing Business in China—The
approval, filing or other requirements of the China Securities Regulatory Commission or other
PRC government authorities may be required under PRC law in connection with our issuance
of securities overseas or to maintain the trading status of our ADSs” on pages 53
and 54 of this annual report. |
| ● | Uncertainties in the
interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations. For details, see “Item
3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks relating to Doing Business in China—Uncertainties
in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections
available to you and us” on pages 54 and 55 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
the PRC government intervening or influencing our operations at any time, or exerting more
control over our future overseas offerings or foreign investments in us. For details, see
“Risk Factors—Risks relating to Doing Business in China—The PRC government
may intervene or influence our operations at any time, or may exert more control over our
future overseas offerings or foreign investments in us, which could result in a material
change in our operation and the value of our ADSs” on page 55 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
the difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing
actions in China against us or our management named in the annual report based on foreign
laws. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks relating
to Doing Business in China—You may experience difficulties in effecting service of
legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing actions in China against us or our
management named in the annual report based on foreign laws” on page 56 of this annual
report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
the historical inability of the PCAOB to inspect our former auditor and uncertainties about
the ability of our current auditor to fully cooperate with the PCAOB’s inspection.
For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks relating
to Doing Business in China—The PCAOB had historically been unable to inspect our former
auditor in relation to their audit work performed for our financial statements for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2020, which is included elsewhere in this annual report. Recent
developments with respect to audits of China-based companies may still create uncertainty
about the ability of our current auditor to fully cooperate with the PCAOB’s inspection
requests without the approval of the relevant PRC authorities” on page 56
of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
the potential inability of the PCAOB to inspect our auditor in the future. For details, see
“Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks relating to Doing Business
in China—Trading in our securities on U.S. markets, including the OTC market may be
prohibited under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, if the PCAOB
determines that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely our auditor for two consecutive
years” on page 57 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
failure of the custodians or authorized users of our controlling non-tangible assets to fulfill
their responsibilities. For details, see “Risk Factors—Risks relating to Doing
Business in China—The custodians or authorized users of our controlling non-tangible
assets, including chops and seals, may fail to fulfill their responsibilities, or misappropriate
or misuse these assets” on page 57 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
being classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC enterprise income tax purposes. For
details, see “Risk Factors—Risks relating to Doing Business in China—If
we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification
could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders or ADS holders”
on page 58 of this annual report. |
Risks Relating to Our Class A Ordinary Shares and Our ADSs
In addition to the risks described above, we
are subject to risks relating to our Class A ordinary shares and our ADSs, including, but are not limited to, the following:
| ● | Risks associated with
our PFIC status. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks
relating to Our Class A Ordinary Shares and Our ADSs—We believe that we were likely a passive
foreign investment company, or a PFIC, for our 2022 taxable year and we anticipate that we
will likely be a PFIC in 2023 and potentially also in future years, which will result in adverse federal income tax consequences to U.S. investors in the ADSs or ordinary
shares” on page 73 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
the volatility of the trading price of our ADSs. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D.
Risk Factors—Risks relating to Our Class A Ordinary Shares and Our ADSs—The trading
price of our ADSs has been volatile and may continue to be volatile, regardless of our operating
performance” on pages 65 and 66 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
failure of the securities or industry analysts to publish research or reports in favor of
us, or at all. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks
relating to Our Class A Ordinary Shares and Our ADSs—If securities or industry analysts
do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they adversely change their
recommendations regarding the ADSs, the trading price for the ADSs and trading volume could
decline” on page 66 of this annual report. |
| ● | Risks associated with
our dual-class voting structure that will your ability to influence corporate matters. For
details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks relating to
Our Class A Ordinary Shares and Our ADSs—Our dual-class voting structure will limit
your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any
change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view
as beneficial” on pages 66 and 67 of this annual report. |
Risks associated with our dual-class voting structure that
may adversely affect the trading market for our ADSs. For details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks
relating to Our Class A Ordinary Shares and Our ADSs—The dual-class structure of our ordinary shares may adversely affect the trading
market for our ADSs” on page 67 of this annual report.
Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry
The significant and ongoing changes in our business strategies
and offerings may make it difficult to evaluate our future prospects.
We historically generated a significant portion
of our revenue from after-school tutoring services for academic subjects included in China’s compulsory education system (the “Academic
AST Business”). In order to fully comply with applicable PRC regulatory requirements adopted by the PRC government in the second
half of 2021, we have terminated our Academic AST Business. In September 2022, we entered into a definitive share purchase agreement
with Eternal Zenith Limited (“Eternal Zenith”), an entity controlled by Mr. Jiajun Wu, a senior management member of the
Company affiliated with our controlling shareholder. Pursuant to such share purchase agreement, Mr. Jiajun Wu, through Eternal Zenith,
would acquire all of our K-12 after-school tutoring business, including all associated assets and liabilities (the “K-12 Business”),
for a nominal consideration. We are also in the process of transitioning to a business strategy that will be focused more on the offering
of STEAM courses and development of SaaS solutions and smart devices for students and educational institutions.
The changes in our business strategies and offerings
may have some or all of the following unintended effects:
| ● | Some users, students,
customers and business partners may not receive the changes in our business strategies and
offerings in a positive manner and relationships with these parties may be jeopardized; |
| ● | Our new products and
services may not be accepted by our users as we expect; |
| ● | Our new products and
services may not attract users and customers or generate the revenue required to succeed; |
| ● | The underlying assumptions
and estimates about our new business and the new markets that we attempt to enter into may
prove incorrect, which may cause our actual results of operations to fall short of our expectations; |
| ● | To the extent we enter
into new businesses, our previous operating history may be of limited use for investors to
evaluate our future performance and prospects; |
| ● | The development of
new products and services could be costly and time-consuming and requires us to make significant
investments in research and product development, develop new technologies, and increase sales
and marketing efforts, all of which may not be successful; |
| ● | Expenses will be incurred
in the implementation of the new business strategies and the implementation process may distract
us from achieving other fundamental business objectives; and |
| ● | The changes in organizational
structure that will be required to support the changes in our business strategies and offerings
may lead to dissatisfaction among employees which could make it more difficult for us to
retain key employees. |
If we are unable to successfully address these
risks and uncertainties, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Our compliance with the Opinions on
Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education and the implementation measures
issued by the relevant PRC government authorities has materially and adversely affected and may continue to affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospect.
The PRC private education industry, especially
the after-school tutoring sector, has experienced intense scrutiny and has been subject to significant regulatory changes recently that
had materially and adversely impacted businesses in such industry. In particular, the Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework
and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education jointly promulgated by the General Office of State Council and the General
Office of Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on July 24, 2021, or the Alleviating Burden Opinion, sets out a series of
operating requirements on after-school tutoring institutions, including, among other things, (i) local government authorities shall no
longer approve any new after-school tutoring institutions providing tutoring services on academic subjects for students in compulsory
education, or the Academic AST Institutions, and all the existing Academic AST Institutions shall be registered as non-profit institutions,
and local government authorities shall no longer approve any new after-school tutoring institutions providing tutoring services on academic
subjects for pre-school-age children and students in grade ten to twelve; (ii) online after-school tutoring institutions that have filed
with the local education administration authorities will be subject to review and re-approval procedures by competent government authorities,
and any failure to obtain such approval will result in the cancellation of its previous filing and ICP license; (iii) Academic AST Institutions
are prohibited from raising funds by listing on stock markets or conducting any capitalization activities and listed companies are prohibited
from investing in Academic AST Institutions through capital markets fund raising activities, or acquiring assets of Academic AST Institutions
by paying cash or issuing securities; (iv) foreign capital is prohibited from controlling or participating in any Academic AST Institutions
through mergers and acquisitions, entrusted operation, franchise or variable interest entities; (v) no advertisements for after-school
tutoring shall be published or broadcasted in the network platforms and billboards displayed in the mainstream media, new media, public
place and residential areas; (vi) government authorities will implement risk management and control for the pre-collection of fees by
after-school tutoring institutions with requirements such as setting up third-party custodians and risk reserves, and strengthen supervision
over loans regarding tutoring services; (vii) online tutoring for preschool-age children is prohibited, and offline academic subjects
(including foreign language) tutoring services for preschool-age children is also strictly prohibited; and (viii) non-academic tutoring
shall obtain approval from relevant government authorities. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulation
Relating to Private Education—Regulation Relating to After-school Tutoring and Educational Apps” for more details.
To implement the Alleviating Burden Opinion,
in September 2021, the Chinese Ministry of Education, or the MOE, published on its official website that the MOE, together with other
government authorities, issued a circular requiring all Academic AST Institutions to complete registration as non-profit organizations
by the end of 2021 and a circular requiring all online after-school tutoring institutions that have filed with the local education administration
authorities providing tutoring services on academic subjects to obtain the private school operating permit by the end of 2021, and all
Academic AST Institutions and online after-school tutoring institutions shall, before completing such registration or obtaining such
permit as applicable, suspend enrollment of students and charging fees. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business
Overview—Regulation—Regulation Relating to Private Education—Regulation Relating to After-school Tutoring and Educational
Apps” for more details.
In September 2022, we entered into a definitive
share purchase agreement with Eternal Zenith, an entity controlled by Mr. Jiajun Wu, a senior management member of the Company affiliated
with our controlling shareholder. Pursuant to such share purchase agreement, Mr. Jiajun Wu, through Eternal Zenith, would acquire all
of our K-12 Business, including all associated assets and liabilities, for a nominal consideration. The disposal of the K-12 Business,
together with the accompanying internal reorganization, are crucial steps for us to fully comply with the latest PRC regulatory requirements.
Due to the complexity and substantial uncertainty of the regulatory environment, we cannot assure you that our operations would be in
full compliance with applicable laws, regulations and policies, including the Alleviating Burden Opinion and its implementation measures,
including without limitation requirements on non-academic tutoring and pre-collection of fees, in a timely manner, or at all. It is also
uncertain whether certain of our services would be deemed as tutoring to preschoolers and thus not permitted under the Alleviating Burden
Opinion. We may become subject to fines or other penalties or be required to terminate certain operations, in which case our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected further. In addition, we may incur material
impairment and severance charges as well as other material costs and expenses resulting from tuition refunds, termination of leases,
and other actions we take in light of the latest regulatory developments, which may have material adverse impact on our financial condition,
results of operations and prospect.
The State Council promulgated the Amended Implementation
Rules for the Private Education Law, or the Amended Implementation Rules, which became effective on September 1, 2021, which provides,
among others, that a private school engaging in online education activities using internet technology shall obtain the relevant private
school operating permit. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulation
Relating to Private Education—The Law for Promoting Private Education and its Implementing Rules.” Further, the PRC government
authorities have issued several regulations aiming to strength its regulation of after-school tutoring institutions, including without
limitation the Opinion on the Regulation of the Development of After-school Training Institutions, the Opinions on Guiding and Regulating
the Orderly and Healthy Development of Educational Mobile Apps, or the Opinions on Educational Apps, the Administrative Measures for
After-School Tutoring Materials for Primary and Secondary School Students (for Trial Implementation), and the Administrative Measures
for Practitioners of the After-School Tutoring Institutions (for Trial Implementation). The MOE jointly with other government authorities
promulgated the Notice on Regulating Non-Academic After-school Training Institutions and the Opinions on Standardizing Non-Academic After-School
Tutoring for Primary and Secondary School Students respectively on March 3, 2022 and December 8, 2022, which raise certain compliance
requirements on non-academic after school tutoring institutions. On April 2, 2022, the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, together
with five other government authorities promulgated the Implementation Measures for the Establishment and Management of After-school Training
Institutions in Shanghai effective from April 15, 2022, which raise certain compliance requirements on establishment and management of
after-school tutoring institutions in Shanghai. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulation
Relating to Private Education—Regulation Relating to After-school Tutoring and Educational Apps” for more details. According
to our consultation with the local government authority which has jurisdiction over our non-academic tutoring services, the local government
authority acknowledged us that it has not started to accept application of private school operating permit for our provision of non-academic
tutoring services, and therefore, we have not obtained a private school operating permit for our provision of non-academic tutoring services.
We will closely monitor the regulatory development and take measures in a timely manner regarding application of private school operating
permit for our provision of non-academic tutoring services. Certain aspects of our existing online course business may be deemed to not
be in full compliance with the above-mentioned laws and regulations regarding online after school tutoring. The relevant governmental
authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing, and may from time to time conduct inspections on compliance
with, such laws and regulations and their related local rules. We have been making and will continue to make efforts to comply with such
regulations as well as requirement by relevant governmental authorities during such inspections. However, we cannot assure you that we
will be able to comply with such regulations and requirements in a timely manner, or at all. If we fail to comply with these regulations
and requirements, we may be subject to fines, regulatory orders to suspend our operations or other regulatory and disciplinary sanctions,
which may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
In addition, it is uncertain whether and how
the PRC government would promulgate additional laws, regulations and guidance regarding the online private education industry, including
those promulgated to apply more stringent social and ethical standards in the education sector in general or with respect to non-academic
tutoring services, and there is no assurance that we can comply with any such newly promulgated laws and regulations in a timely manner
or at all. Failure to regain compliance may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
For more details of the relevant laws and regulations, please refer to “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business
Overview—Regulation—Regulation Relating to Private Education.”
If we are not able to continue to attract
students to purchase our courses and to increase the spending of our students, our business and prospects will be materially and adversely
affected.
After the disposal of our K-12 Business, we generate
net revenues primarily from students paying for our STEAM courses and smart devices. Our ability to continue to attract students to purchase
these courses and new courses we may offer in the future and to increase their spending are critical to the continued success and growth
of our business. This in turn will depend on several factors, including our ability to recruit, train and retain high-quality teaching
staff, continue to develop, adapt or enhance the quality of our course offerings to meet the evolving demands of our existing or prospective
students, adapt our promotional activities to changes in market demand, comply with regulatory regime and practices, enhance our brand
equity and awareness to a broader base of potential customers, and provide a more localized, personalized and effective learning experience
to our students.
Our ability to retain existing students by delivering
a satisfactory learning experience is also critical to the success of our business. We may not succeed in improving our students’
learning ability, attitude, efforts and time and resource commitments of each student. Students may feel dissatisfied with the quality
of our educational content offerings and the teachers and student service staff they encounter during our courses or fail to perform
up to expectation after attending our courses. In addition, our courses may not be able to satisfy all of our students’ requirements.
Satisfaction with our courses may be affected by a number of factors, many of which may not relate to the quality or effectiveness of
our course offerings. If students feel that we are not providing them the learning experience they have subscribed for, they may choose
to withdraw from existing courses and seek refunds. In addition, the students who fail to improve their performance after attending our
programs or have unsatisfactory learning experiences with us may also choose not to refer other students to us, which in turn may adversely
affect the number of paid student enrollments.
All of these factors may contribute to reduced
student engagement and increased challenges in attracting and enrolling prospective students. We must also manage our growth while maintaining
consistent and high teaching quality, and respond effectively to competitive pressures. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain
students to purchase our courses and to increase the spending of our students, our net revenues may decline, which may have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we are unable to maintain consistent
quality or timely develop our educational content in a cost-effective manner to make them appealing to existing and prospective students,
our business and reputation may be materially and adversely affected.
We have developed an intelligent educational
content recommendation system that automatically generates bespoke course materials, which is empowered by our comprehensive content
library and big data capabilities. Our educational content development team work closely with our teachers on developing, updating and
improving our course materials to stay abreast of the latest educational trends in their respective subject areas. The adjustments, updates
and expansions of our existing education content offerings, development of new course materials and bespoke course materials generated
by our content recommendation system, may not be accepted by existing or prospective students. As we experience significant changes to
our business model and educational content development due to recent adverse regulatory changes, we are in the process of adapting our
faculty to hire teachers and employees with relevant experiences to execute our new strategies in educational content offerings. Even
if we are able to develop acceptable new course materials, we may not be able to introduce them as quickly as students require or as
quickly as our competitors introduce competing offerings. Furthermore, offering new courses materials or upgrading existing ones may
require us to spend significant resources and make significant investments in educational content development. If we are unsuccessful
in pursuing content development and upgrading opportunities due to the financial constraints, unable to attract product and content development
personnel, or encounter other related challenges, our ability to attract and retain students and our business and reputation may be materially
and adversely affected.
Our business depends on the continued
success of our brand, and if we fail to maintain and enhance the recognition of our brand, we may face difficulty attracting students
to our STEAM courses, and our reputation and operating results may be harmed.
We believe that market awareness of our brand
has contributed significantly to the success of our business. Maintaining and enhancing our brand is critical to our efforts to attract
students. Our ability to maintain and enhance brand recognition and reputation depends primarily on the perceived effectiveness and quality
of our services, as well as the success of our branding and marketing efforts. Failure to maintain and enhance our brand recognition,
particularly amid adverse regulatory changes that significantly affected our business, could have a material and adverse effect on our
business, operating results and financial condition. In recent years, we have devoted significant resources to our brand promotion efforts,
but we cannot assure you that these efforts will be successful. If we are unable to further enhance our brand recognition, or if our
brand image is negatively impacted by any negative publicity relating to our company, courses or teachers, regardless of its veracity,
we may not be able to attract students to our online after-school tutoring service successfully or efficiently, and our business and
results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
We face significant competition, which
could increase our customer acquisition cost, cause us to lose students to our competitors, lead to pricing pressure and loss of market
shares, and significantly reduce our net revenues.
The online education industry in China is competitive,
and we expect competition in this sector to persist. We face competition in each part of our service offerings, such as online courses,
from other online and offline educational service providers. Some of our current or future competitors may have longer operating histories,
greater brand recognition, or greater financial, technical or marketing resources than we do. In particular, for our STEAM courses, we
compete with other education service providers across a range of factors, including, among others, insights based on learning data and
empowered by data analytics capabilities, application of a wide range of advanced technology in different educational scenarios, functions
covering diversified educational scenarios and friendly user experience, effectiveness of customer services and sales and marketing efforts,
and track record, trust and brand recognition. Our competitors may adopt similar curricula and marketing approaches, with different pricing
and service packages that may have greater appeal than our offerings. In addition, some of our competitors may have more resources than
we do and may be able to devote greater resources than we can to the development and promotion of their products and services and respond
more quickly than we can to the changes in student preferences and market needs or new technologies. As a result, our course enrollment,
particularly for our STEAM courses, may decrease due to intense competition. If we reduce course fees or increase spending in response
to competition in order to retain or attract students and high quality teaching staff, or pursue new market opportunities, our net revenues
may decrease and our costs and expenses may increase as a result of such actions which may adversely affect our operating margins. If
we are unable to successfully compete for students, maintain or increase our level of course fees, attract and retain competent teaching
staff or other key personnel, maintain our competitiveness in terms of the quality of our education services in a cost-effective manner,
we may lose our market share and our financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.
If we are not able to continue to recruit,
train and retain a sufficient number of qualified teachers, our business, financial conditions and operating results may be materially
and adversely affected.
Our teachers are critical to maintaining the
quality of our course offerings, the learning experience of our students and our brand and reputation. We seek to recruit high-quality
teachers with strong education background and teaching skills who have a strong command of the subject areas to be taught and meet our
qualifications. As we mainly offer STEAM courses in online format, we require a sufficient number of teachers to deliver our courses.
The supply of teachers in China with the necessary experience and qualifications to teach our courses is limited, and we must provide
competitive pay and offer attractive career development opportunities to attract and retain them. As we experience significant changes
to our business model and educational content development due to recent adverse regulatory changes, we are in the process of adapting
our faculty to hire teachers and employees with relevant experiences to execute our new strategies in educational content offerings.
We cannot assure that we will be able to continue recruit and retain a sufficient number of quality teachers in the future, and if we
fail to do so, our teaching quality may be adversely affected. Departure of quality teachers may also reduce the attractiveness of our
course offerings and negatively impact our paid student enrollments. We need to also provide on-going training to our teachers,
particularly our part-time teachers, to ensure that they stay abreast of changes in course materials, student demands and other changes
and trends necessary to teach effectively. Furthermore, as we continue to develop new educational content, we may need to engage additional
high-quality teachers with appropriate skill sets or backgrounds to deliver instructions effectively. We cannot guarantee that we will
be able to effectively engage and train such teachers quickly, or at all. In addition, given other potentially more attractive opportunities
for our high-quality teachers, over time some of them may choose to leave us. In response to the recent regulatory developments, we have
further optimized our teachers’ utilization and adjusted the faculty structure to strategically increase the proportion of part-time
teachers. As a result, some of our teachers have left us. In the event such teachers join our competitors, students may decide to follow
such teachers and enroll in their courses offered through other online education companies, which may weaken our competitive position
in the industry.
In addition, we engage third-party service providers
through service agreements to help us recruit, train and manage teachers. If we are unable to enter into new agreements or extend existing
agreements with such third-party service providers on terms and conditions acceptable to us and in compliance with PRC regulatory
requirements, we may not be able to find alternative third-party service companies to provide similar services in a timely and reliable
manner, or at all. Although we have not experienced major difficulties in engaging, training or retaining high-quality teachers in the
past, we may not always be able to engage, train and retain a sufficient number of high-quality teachers to keep pace with our growth
and our expansion into more comprehensive grade, subject matter and course material coverage, while maintaining consistent education
quality. We may also face significant competition in engaging high-quality teachers from our competitors or from other opportunities
that are perceived as more desirable. A shortage of high-quality teachers, a decrease in the quality of our teachers’ performance,
whether actual or perceived, or a significant increase in the cost to engage or retain high-quality teachers would have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Students may decide not to continue
taking our courses for a number of reasons, including a perceived lack of improvement in their performance or general dissatisfaction
with our courses, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and reputation.
The success of our business
depends in large part on our ability to retain our students by delivering a satisfactory learning experience and improving their performance.
If students feel that we are not providing the experience they are seeking, they may choose to withdraw from existing courses and seek
refunds. For example, our courses and teachers may fail to significantly improve a student’s performance. Student satisfaction
with our programs may decline for a number of reasons, many of which may not reflect the effectiveness of our courses and teaching methods.
A student’s learning experience may also suffer if his or her relationship with our teachers does not meet expectations. If a significant
number of students fail to significantly improve their performance after taking our courses or if their learning experiences with us
are unsatisfactory, they may not purchase additional courses from us or refer other students to us and our business, financial condition,
results of operations and reputation would be adversely affected.
We adjusted the time
slots to offer after-school tutoring courses in order to fully comply with the recent regulatory requirements. Since we are no longer
allowed to provide tutoring services on academic subjects during national holidays, weekends and school breaks, certain of our students
withdrew from existing courses and sought refunds from us. Any refund payments that we were required to make to our students, as well
as the expenses we incurred for processing refunds, could be substantial and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations. A high volume of refunds may also generate negative publicity that could harm our reputation.
We face uncertainties with respect
to the development of regulatory requirements on operating licenses and permits for our business operations in China. Failure to renew
and maintain requested licenses or permits in a timely manner or obtain newly required ones could have a material adverse impact on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
As an online education
service provider, we are required to obtain and maintain all necessary approvals, licenses or permits and make all necessary registration
and filings applicable to our business operations in China, and we may be required to apply for and obtain additional licenses or permits
for our operations as the interpretation and implementation of current PRC laws and regulations are still evolving, and new laws and
regulations may also be promulgated.
We may be deemed to
provide certain services or conduct certain activities and thus be subject to certain licenses, approvals, permits, registrations and
filings, or be required to expand the scope of the licenses so obtained by us, due to the lack of official interpretations of certain
terms under internet related PRC regulations and laws.
For example, we print
and provide physical education materials to our students. If the government authorities deem our printing and provision of physical education
materials to students as “publication of books” under Administrative Regulations on Publishing, we may be required to engage
qualified publishers to publish such physical education materials, failure of which may subject us to penalties, including orders to
cease illegal activities, discontinuation of operations, correction order, condemnation, fines, civil and criminal liability. See “Item
4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulation Relating to Publishing.”
We offer our courses
online where the live audio/video data are transmitted through the platforms between the specific recipients instantly. In addition,
we also offer pre-recorded courses and certain other audio-video contents on our online platforms to our students. According
to relevant PRC laws and regulations, no entities or individuals may provide internet audio-visual program services without a License
for Online Transmission of Audio-Visual Programs (the “AVSP”) issued by the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio,
Film and Television, or the SAPPRFT (currently known as National Radio and Television Administration), or its local bureaus or completing
the relevant registration procedures with SAPPRFT or its local bureaus. Currently only state-owned or state-controlled entities are eligible
to apply for an AVSP. As of the date of this annual report, we do not hold an AVSP, and we have not been explicitly required by relevant
government authorities to obtain the AVSP, or to complete filings as an internet live-streaming platform. However, there is possibility
that the PRC government will change its view and find that our activities mentioned above or any other content offered by us fall within
the definition of “internet audio-visual programs” and thus require us to obtain the AVSP. We are, however, not eligible
to apply for such license since we are not a state-owned or state-controlled entity. If this were to occur, we may be subject to penalties,
fines, legal sanctions or an order to suspend the provision of our relevant services.
Furthermore, Shanghai
Zhangda, the VIE, currently holds a Value-added Telecommunications Business Operating License for certain internet information service,
or ICP License. However, we cannot assure you that the ICP Licenses held by the VIE can be updated in a timely manner or at all with
respect to business activities, websites and applications associated with our business operations because relevant laws and regulations
are constantly evolving and can be subject to differing interpretations by PRC government authorities. In addition, the Amended Implementation
Rules require that a private school engaging in online education activities using internet technology obtain the relevant private school
operating permit. As of the date of this annual report, we have not obtained a private school operating permit, which may be required
for our online education services. Moreover, the Opinions on Educational Apps require that education apps be filed with competent provincial
regulatory authorities for education. Following the Opinions on Educational Apps, we filed our education apps with relevant government
authorities. However, to implement the Alleviating Burden Opinion, the MoE requires all educational apps already filed to be refiled
to make sure they comply with relevant compliance requirements under the Alleviating Burden Opinion and we are in the process of preparing
for application of refiling of our educational apps. Failures to obtain or update such licenses and permits may subject us to fines,
confiscation of relevant gains, suspend the operations of our online platforms and other liabilities. Last but not least, due to the
ambiguity of the definition of “online publishing service,” and “internet live-streaming services”, the online
distribution of content, including our course materials, and our internet education services may be regarded as an “online publishing
service” or “internet live-streaming services” and therefore we may be required to obtain an Online Publishing License,
or to complete filings as an internet live-streaming platform.
As of the date of this
annual report, no fines or other penalties have been imposed on us for failure to obtain such additional licenses or permits, or to expand
the scope of our existing licenses and permits. However, there can be no assurance that once required, we will be able to obtain or maintain
all the required approvals, licenses, permits and complete or maintain all necessary filings, records, renewals, expansion of scope,
and registrations on a timely basis for our online after-school tutoring service, given the significant amount of discretion the PRC
authorities may have in interpreting, implementing and enforcing relevant rules and regulations, as well as other factors beyond our
control and anticipation. In addition, there can also be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our existing licenses, approvals,
registrations or permits. If we fail to obtain and maintain required permits, to expand scope of such permits obtained by us in a timely
manner or obtain or renew any permits and certificates, or fail to complete the necessary filings, records, renewals or registrations
on a timely basis, we may be subject to fines, confiscation of the gains derived from our non-compliant operations, suspension
of our non-compliant operations or claims for compensation of any economic loss suffered by our students or other relevant
parties, and our business, financial conditions and operational results may be materially and adversely affected.
We may not maintain profitability in
the future given our historical net losess positions.
We had net losses from
continuing operations of RMB280.5 million, RMB264.2 million and RMB97.8 million (US$14.2 million) in 2020, 2021 and 2022. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to generate or maintain net profits or positive cash flow from operating activities in the future. Our
ability to maintain profitability will depend in large part on our ability to generate sufficient revenues from our remaining and new
service offerings after the disposal of the K-12 Business, and our ability to manage our costs and operating expenses as a percentage
of our net revenues. Accordingly, we intend to continue to invest to attract new students, hire high-quality teachers and other personnel,
and strengthen our educational content development and data analytics capabilities to enhance student experience, in cost-effective manners.
As part of our business transition in order to adapt to the recent adverse regulatory changes to the online education industry in China,
we launched several new products and services, such as our education-centric SaaS solution and smart devices. These efforts may be costlier
than we expect, and our net revenues may not increase sufficiently to offset the expenses. We may continue to take actions and make investments
that do not generate optimal financial results and may even result in significantly increased operating and net losses in the short term
with no assurance that we will eventually achieve our intended long-term benefits or profitability. These factors, among others set out
in this “Risk Factors” section, may negatively affect our ability to achieve profitability in the near term, if at all.
We may not be successful in our strategies
to offer additional educational services such as STEAM courses.
After the disposal of
the K-12 Business, we primarily offer tutoring courses covering STEAM subjects. We also launched new service and product lines,
such as SaaS solutions and education-centric smart devices, as part of our business transition in order to adapt to the recent adverse
regulatory changes to the online education industry in China. Upgrades to our existing products and courses may not be well received
by our students and teachers, and newly introduced products and services may not achieve success as expected. Our lack of experience
and track record with these new products and services may adversely affect our prospects and our ability to compete with the existing
market players in any of these product and service categories. The development of new products, services and content could disrupt our
ongoing business, disrupt our management’s attention, be costly and time-consuming and require us to make significant investments
in research and product development, develop new technologies, and increase sales and marketing efforts, all of which may not be successful.
We cannot assure you that any of such new products or services will achieve market acceptance or generate sufficient revenues to offset
the costs and expenses incurred in relation to our development and promotion efforts. In addition, given significant uncertainties associated
with recent PRC regulatory developments in the private education industry, there is no guarantee that our STEAM courses offerings will
not be subject to PRC regulatory restrictions that may potentially lead to the material modifications or termination of such high school
and STEAM courses offerings. If we are unsuccessful in our expansion of STEAM after-school tutoring products or in our development of
additional educational services due to financial constraints, failure to attract qualified personnel, regulatory restrictions or other
reasons, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We may not be able to maintain or increase
our course fee levels.
After the disposal of
our K-12 Business, our results of operations are primarily affected by the pricing of our remaining course offerings. For many of these
course offerings, we have a limited track record and experience in managing their fee levels in a highly competitive market. We determine
our course fees primarily based on the demand for our course offerings, the cost of our operations, the course fees charged by our competitors,
our pricing strategy to gain market share and general economic conditions in the PRC. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to maintain
or increase our tuition levels in the future without adversely affecting the demand for our online course offerings.
If we are unable to conduct sales and
marketing activities cost-effectively, our results of operations and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.
We have incurred significant
sales and marketing expenses of continuing operations. We incurred RMB278.9 million, RMB231.9 million and RMB50.2 million (US$7.3 million)
in sales and marketing expenses of continuing operations in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. Our sales activities may not be well received
by students or customers, and may not result in the levels of sales that we anticipate and our trial lessons may not be attractive to
our prospective students and customers. Furthermore, we may not be able to achieve the operational efficiency necessary to increase the
revenues per sales and marketing staff. We also may not be able to retain or recruit experienced sales and marketing staff, or to efficiently
train junior staff. Further, marketing and branding approaches and tools in the online education market in China are evolving, especially
for mobile platforms. This further requires us to enhance our marketing and branding approaches and experiment with new methods to keep
pace with industry developments and student preferences. Failure to refine our existing marketing and branding approaches or to introduce
new marketing and branding approaches in a cost-effective manner may reduce our market share, cause our revenues to decline and negatively
impact our profitability.
Our advertising and promotional content
may subject us to penalties and other administrative actions.
Under PRC advertising,
pricing and anti-unfair competition laws and regulations, we are obligated to monitor our advertising and promotional content to ensure
that such content is true, accurate, not misleading and in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations. For example, the PRC
Pricing Law provides that an operator is prohibited from using false or misleading pricing methods to induce consumers or other operators
to enter into transactions with it. The PRC Anti-Unfair Competition Law prohibits business operators from making false or misleading
commercial promotions regarding its performance, functions, quality, sales, user feedback or accolades, to defraud or mislead customers.
In addition, education or training advertisements are further prohibited from containing content such as guarantees that a candidate
will pass the related examination or regarding the effect of education or training, recommendation and/or endorsement by scientific research
institutes, academic institutions, educational organizations, industry associations, professionals or beneficiaries using their name
or image. Further, the Alleviating Burden Opinion provides that no advertisements for after-school tutoring shall be published or broadcasted
in the network platforms and billboards displayed in the mainstream media, new media, public place and residential areas. Violation of
these laws and regulations may subject us to penalties, including fines, confiscation of relevant income, orders to cease dissemination
of the inappropriate advertisements and promotions, and orders to publish an announcement correcting the misleading information. We have
implemented internal review and employee training procedures to ensure the appropriateness of our advertising and promotional content.
However, there is no guarantee that such measures would always be effective in preventing potential violations, particularly in light
of the evolving laws and regulations and the increased regulatory scrutiny in recent periods. For example, historically we had been subject
to fines imposed by relevant governmental authority for making misleading advertisements and promotions (including with respect to certain
inappropriate advertisements concerning the enrollment, faculty, content, effectiveness and pricing of our courses) and had been ordered
to remove such advertisements and promotions. In circumstances involving serious violations by us, PRC government authorities may force
us to terminate our advertising and promotional operations or revoke our licenses. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B.
Business Overview—Regulation—Regulation Relating to Advertising, Pricing and Promotion.”
Relevant PRC regulatory
authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing the PRC Advertising Law, PRC Pricing Law, the PRC Anti-Unfair
Competition Law and the related rules and regulations. While we have made more efforts to ensure that our advertisements are in full
compliance with applicable PRC laws and regulations, we cannot assure you that all the content contained in our advertisements and promotions
is true and accurate as required by, and complies in all aspects with, such laws and regulations. We also cannot assure you that we can
rectify content that is deemed in violation of such laws and regulations, in a timely manner, or at all, especially given the uncertainty
in the interpretation of these PRC laws and regulations. If we are found to be in violation of such laws and regulations, we may be subject
to penalties and our reputation may be harmed, which may result in a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results
of operations and prospects.
Tuition refunds or potential refund
disputes may negatively affect our cash flows, financial condition, and reputation.
We generally offer refunds
for the remaining classes in a course to students who withdraw from such course, subject to certain conditions in the service contract
between us and each of our students. For Zhangmen Kids, if students withdraw from a course at any time, we offer refunds for any remaining
classes to the students after charging an administration fee. The number of refund requests and the amount of refunds could be affected
by a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, without limitation to, any change or development
in applicable PRC laws and regulations, dissatisfaction with our teaching quality and our educational content offerings, a perceived decline
in our teaching quality due to the departure of popular teachers, privacy concerns relating to our services and negative publicity regarding
us or online education in general. Any refund payments that we may be required to make to our students, as well as the expenses we could
incur for processing refunds and resolving refund disputes, could be substantial and could adversely affect our business operations and
financial condition. A high volume of refunds and refund disputes may also generate negative publicity that could harm our reputation.
In addition, we have
incurred and may continue to incur material impairment and severance charges as well as other material costs and expenses resulting from
tuition refunds and other actions we take in light of the latest regulatory developments, which may have material adverse impact on our
financial condition, results of operations and prospect.
If our AI programs or proprietary data
analytics algorithms, especially those related to real-time educational content generation, are flawed or ineffective, our business and
reputation could be harmed.
We rely on our proprietary
data analytics algorithms to analyze student practice exercises and academic assessment results data and based thereon to generate personalized
recommended quiz questions for students and teachers to aid in their learning and teaching, respectively, and to continually develop and
improve the educational content offered in our online after-school tutoring courses. Although we have invested substantially in the development
and continued improvement of our algorithms, we cannot assure you that our algorithms do not and will not carry any flaw or defect that
could compromise our data analysis results. Particularly, some of these flaws or defects may not become evident until the algorithm is
put to actual usage or after its continued failure to accurately generate on-point personalized study question recommendations.
Even if the algorithm is properly designed, its performance may be affected by the quality and volume of student learning performance
data we aggregated. We also expect to experience significant growth in the amount of data we need to process as we continue to develop
our business and grow our student base. As the amount of data and variables we process increases, the calculations that our algorithms
must process become increasingly complex and the likelihood of any defect or error increases. In addition, a significant component of
our online courses is powered by our AI programs, which address complex challenges such as autoscoring, practice exercise review and monitor
of in-class interactions. We may incur significant expenses to remediate any defects in our AI programs or data analytics algorithms,
or may not be able to correct them at all. Although we have not experienced any material defects to date, we cannot assure you that our
AI programs and algorithms are flawless. If any incidents of material defects took place, our student and teacher experiences with our
products and courses would be significantly harmed, and they may lose confidence and trust in our products and courses. As a result, we
may incur significant reputational damage and market share loss.
Our failure to protect our intellectual
property rights may undermine our competitive position, and litigation to protect our intellectual property rights or defend against third-party
allegations of infringement may be costly and ineffective.
We believe that our patents,
copyrights, trademarks and other intellectual property are essential to our success. We have devoted considerable time and energy to the
development and improvement of our websites, mobile apps, our system infrastructure and our course materials.
We rely primarily on
patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and other contractual restrictions for the protection of the intellectual property used
in our business. Nevertheless, these provide only limited protection and the actions we take to protect our intellectual property rights
may not be adequate. Furthermore, our pending intellectual property right applications may be rejected. Our trade secrets may become known
or be independently discovered by our competitors. Third parties may pirate our educational content and course materials developed in-house and
may infringe upon or misappropriate our other intellectual property. Infringement upon or the misappropriation of, our proprietary technologies
or other intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Although
we have taken measures to monitoring and policing the unauthorized use of our copyrighted course materials, policing the unauthorized
use of intellectual property rights can be difficult and expensive. For example, even though the contracts we entered into with our teachers
specify that we shall have sole ownership over intellectual properties relating to our course content, we and our teachers may be deemed
to have joint ownership over intellectual properties relating to our course content. Our teachers may continue to use these content in
our course materials if they resign with us and join our competitors, which may negatively impact the attractiveness of our courses to
prospective students, and our intellectual property rights for such content could be costly and time consuming to defend. Although the
agreements entered into with our teachers prohibit them from using our course content without our prior consent, we cannot ensure compliance
of teachers with such agreement.
Furthermore, litigation
may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary
rights of others. Such litigation may be costly and divert management’s attention away from our business. An adverse determination
in any such litigation would impair our intellectual property rights and may harm our business, prospects and reputation. The legal regime
relating to the recognition and enforcement of intellectual property rights in China is particularly limited, and does not protect intellectual
property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States. Legal proceedings to enforce our intellectual property
in China may progress slowly, during which time infringement may continue largely unimpeded. Enforcement of judgments in China is uncertain,
and even if we are successful in litigation, it may not provide us with an effective remedy. In addition, we have no insurance coverage
against litigation costs and would have to bear all costs arising from such litigation to the extent we are unable to recover them from
other parties. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
We may be involved in legal and other
disputes from time to time arising out of our operations, which may be expensive to defend and may disrupt our business and operations.
We have and may continue
to be involved in legal and other disputes in the ordinary course of our business, including allegations against us for disputes regarding
sales and marketing fees and computer leasing, and potential infringement of third-party copyrights or other intellectual property rights.
We may also encounter disputes from time to time over rights and obligations concerning intellectual property rights and other legal rights,
in particular third-party copyrights that may be infringed by us or the teachers and student service staff in our business operation,
and we may not prevail in those disputes. Our educational content is typically subject to internal review before being approved to launch
and our content monitoring personnel are responsible for monitoring content delivered in our courses. We have also adopted policies and
procedures to prohibit teachers, student service staff and other personnel from infringing upon third-party copyrights or, other intellectual
property rights. However, we cannot assure you that our efforts will be effective in preventing potential infringement of third-party
intellectual property rights or that teachers, student service staff or other personnel will not, against our policies, use third-party
copyrighted materials or intellectual property without proper authorization in our classes or on our applications or websites. The students
and teachers using our applications or websites may post unauthorized third-party content on our applications or websites, which we may
not be able to detect in time, or at all. We may incur liability for unauthorized duplication or distribution of materials posted on our
applications or websites or used in our classes. We have been, and may be in the future, subject to allegations on the grounds of intellectual
property rights infringement and other legal theories based on the content of the materials that we or teachers and student service staff
of our courses distribute or use in our business operation.
In November 2021, we
and certain of our current and former officers and directors were named as defendants a putative securities class action filed in federal
court alleging that we made material misstatements and omissions in our IPO registration statement. On April 12, 2022, the lead plaintiff
in the action filed an amended complaint, alleging violations of Section 11 and Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 based upon alleged
omissions in our IPO registration statement. We will have to defend against the putative securities class action lawsuit, including any
appeals of such lawsuits should its initial defense be unsuccessful. We have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which is
awaiting resolution by the court. The lawsuit is in its preliminary stages. We are currently unable to estimate the possible outcome or
loss or possible range of loss, if any, associated with the resolution of the lawsuit. In the event that its initial defense of the lawsuits
is unsuccessful, we cannot assure you that we will prevail in any appeal. Any adverse outcome of the case, including any plaintiff’s
appeal of a judgment in the lawsuits, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operation,
cash flows, and reputation. The litigation process may utilize a significant portion of our resources and divert management’s attention
from the day-to-day operations, all of which could harm our business.
Any claims against us,
with or without merit, could be time-consuming and costly to defend or litigate, divert our management’s attention and resources
or result in the loss of goodwill associated with our brand. The application and interpretation of China’s intellectual property
right laws and the procedures and standards for granting trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual property
rights in China, and the laws governing personal rights are still evolving and remain uncertain, and we cannot assure you that PRC courts
or regulatory authorities would agree with our analysis. If a lawsuit against us is successful, we may be required to pay substantial
damages and/or enter into royalty or license agreements with commercially unreasonable terms, or we may be unable to enter into such agreements
at all. We may also lose, or be limited in, the rights to offer some of our course offerings, parts of our products or be required to
make changes to our course materials, applications or other software. As a result, the scope of our course materials could be reduced,
which could adversely affect the effectiveness of our curriculum, limit our ability to attract new students, harm our reputation and have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
If our security measures are breached
or failed and result in unauthorized disclosure or unintended leakage of data, including confidential information of our teachers and
students, we could lose existing teachers and students, fail to attract new teachers and students and be exposed to protracted and costly
litigation.
Maintaining platform
security is of critical importance to us because we store and transmit proprietary and confidential information, which includes proprietary
and confidential student and teaching staff information, such as names, addresses, ID card number, bank account number and other personal
information, which is primarily stored in our digital database. To ensure the confidentiality and integrity of our data, we maintain a
comprehensive and rigorous data security program. For example, we anonymize and encrypt confidential personal information and take other
technological measures to ensure the secure processing, transmission and usage of data. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B.
Business Overview—Data Privacy and Security.” These measures, however, may not be as effective as we anticipate. As an online
education company, we face an increasing number of threats to our platform and computer systems, including unauthorized activity and access,
system viruses, worms, malicious code, denial of service attacks, phishing attacks, and organized cyberattacks, any of which could breach
our security and disrupt our platform and technology infrastructure. The techniques used by computer hackers and cyber criminals to obtain
unauthorized access to data or to sabotage computer systems change frequently and generally are not detected until after an incident has
occurred. We have implemented certain safeguards and processes to thwart hackers and protect the data in our platform and computer systems.
However, our efforts to maintain the security and integrity of our platform, and the cybersecurity measures taken by our third-party service
providers may be unable to anticipate, detect or prevent all attempts to compromise our systems. If our security measures are breached
or fail as a result of third-party action, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise, it could result in the loss or misuse of or authorized
third-party access to proprietary and confidential student, teacher, employee and company information, which could subject us to liability,
interrupt our business or adversely affect our reputation, potentially over an extended period of time.
Increased regulation
of data utilization practices, including self-regulation, under existing laws that limit our ability to collect, transfer and use data,
could have an adverse effect on our business. If we were to disclose data about our students, teachers, and student service staff in a
manner that was objectionable to them, our business reputation could be adversely affected, and we could face potential legal claims that
could impact our operating results. Failure to comply with these obligations could subject us to liability, and to the extent that we
need to alter our business model or practices to adapt to these obligations, we could incur additional expenses.
Any of these issues could
harm our reputation, adversely affect our ability to attract and enroll prospective students, adversely affect our ability to maintain
our filings, cause prospective students not to enroll or stay enrolled, or subject us to third-party lawsuits, regulatory fines or other
action or liability. Further, any reputational damage resulting from breach of our security measures could create distrust of our company
by prospective students or investors. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to protect us against the threat of
security measures breaches or to alleviate problems caused by such disruptions or breaches.
Because we collect, store, process and
use data, some of which contains sensitive personal information, we face concerns over the collection, improper use, storage or disclosure
of personal information, which could discourage current and potential users from using our services, damage our reputation, face regulatory
scrutiny, and in turn materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Concerns or claims about
our practices with regard to the collection, storage, processing or use of personal information or other privacy-related matters, even
if unfounded, could damage our reputation and results of operations. Under the Cybersecurity Law of China, the owners and administrators
of networks and network service providers have various personal information security protection obligations, including restrictions on
the collection, storage and use of personal information of users, and they are required to take steps to prevent personal data from being
divulged, stolen, or tampered with. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulation
Relating to Internet Information Security and Privacy Protection.”
Regulatory requirements
regarding the protection and privacy of data are constantly evolving and can be subject to differing interpretations or significant change,
making the extent of our responsibilities in that regard uncertain. For example, the Cybersecurity Law of the PRC became effective in
June 2017, but there are great uncertainties as to the interpretation and application of the law. It is possible that those regulatory
requirements may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our practices. In
addition, the Office of the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of
Public Security, and the State Administration for Market Regulation jointly issued an announcement on January 23, 2019 regarding
carrying out special campaigns against mobile internet application programs collecting and using personal information in violation of
applicable laws and regulations, which prohibits business operators from collecting personal information irrelevant to their services,
or forcing users to give authorization in disguised manner. Furthermore, the Cyberspace Administration of China issued the Provisions
on the Cyber Protection of Children’s Personal Information on August 22, 2019, which took effect on October 1, 2019. The
Provisions on the Cyber Protection of Children’s Personal Information requires, among others, that network operators who collect,
store, use, transfer and disclose personal information of children under the age of 14 shall establish special rules and user agreements
for the protection of children’s personal information, inform the children’s guardians in a noticeable and clear manner, and
shall obtain the consent of the children’s guardians. On August 17, 2021, the State Council promulgated the Regulations on Critical
Information Infrastructure Security Protection, which has become effective on September 1, 2021. On June 10, 2021, the Standing Committee
of the National People’s Congress promulgated the PRC Data Security Law, effective on September 1, 2021. On August 20, 2021, the
Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated the PRC Personal Information Protection Law, which has become effective
on November 1, 2021. On January 4, 2022, the CAC published the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures, which became effective on February
15, 2022 and repealed the Cybersecurity Review Measures promulgated on April 13, 2020. On January 4, 2022, the CAC published the Administrative
Provisions on Internet Information Service Algorithm Recommendation on its website, which became effective on March 1, 2022. On
July 7, 2022, the CAC promulgated the Security Assessment Measures for Outbound Data Transfer, which
became effective on September 1, 2022. These newly promulgated laws and regulations reflect
PRC government further attempts to strengthen the legal protection for the national network security, data security, the security of key
information infrastructure and the security of personal information protection. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B.
Business Overview—Regulation—Regulation Relating to Internet Information Security and Privacy Protection.”
We
have been taking and will continue to take reasonable measures to comply with such laws, regulations announcement and provisions, however,
as such laws, regulations, announcement and provisions are relatively new, we cannot assure you we can adapt our operations to it in a
timely manner. Evolving interpretations of such laws, regulations, announcements and provisions or any future regulatory changes might
impose additional restrictions on us generating and processing personal and behavioral data. We may be subject to additional regulations,
laws and policies adopted by the PRC government to apply more stringent social and ethical standards in data privacy resulting from the
increased global focus on this area. To the extent that we need to alter our business model or practices to adapt to these announcement
and provisions and future regulations, laws and policies, we could incur additional expenses. Any failure, or perceived failure,
by us, or by our third-party partners, to maintain the security of our user data or to comply with applicable privacy, cybersecurity,
data security and personal information protection laws, regulations, policies, contractual provisions, industry standards, and other requirements,
may result in civil or regulatory liability, including governmental or data protection authority enforcement actions and investigations,
fines, penalties, enforcement orders requiring us to cease operating in a certain way, litigation, or adverse publicity, and may require
us to expend significant resources in responding to and defending allegations and claims. Moreover, claims or allegations that we have
failed to adequately protect our users’ data, or otherwise violated applicable privacy, cybersecurity, data security and personal
information protection laws, regulations, policies, contractual provisions, industry standards, or other requirements, may result in damage
to our reputation and a loss of confidence in us by our students, teachers, or our partners, potentially causing us to lose course enrollments,
content providers, other business partners and revenues, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
The success and future growth of our
business will be affected by students’ acceptance of and market trends in integration of technology and education.
We operate at the intersection
of the education and technology industries, and our business model features integrating technology closely with education to provide a
more efficient and engaging learning experience, particularly as we strive to make significant business transitions from an online education
company focused on the K-12 sector to a technology company serving the broader education industry. However, the integration of technology
and education remains a relatively new concept in China, and there are limited proven methods to project user demand or preference or
available industry standards on which we can rely. In addition, even with the proliferation of internet and mobile devices in China, we
believe that some of our target students may still be inclined to choose traditional, face-to-face courses over online courses
as they find the former more intimate and reliable. We cannot assure you that our products and services will continue to be attractive
to our users in the future. If our online after-school tutoring courses, which utilize data insights and technology, become less appealing
to our users, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Any significant disruption to or failures
of our information technology systems, including events beyond our control, could reduce student satisfaction and could harm our reputation
and cause our online after-school tutoring service to be less attractive to our students.
The performance and reliability
of our information technology system is critical to our operations and reputation. Our network infrastructure is currently deployed and
our data is currently mainly maintained through several third-party internet data centers and cloud computing service providers in China.
Our operations depend on each of the data centers’ and service providers’ ability to protect its and our system in its facilities
against events such as damage or interruption from natural disasters, power or telecommunications failures, air quality issues, environmental
conditions, computer viruses or attempts to harm our systems, criminal acts and similar events, which events are beyond our control. If
our arrangements with such data centers and service providers are terminated or if there is a lapse of service or damage to any of their
facilities, we could experience interruptions in our service. Although we continually back up our databases on both real-time and delayed
bases, we may still lose important operating data or suffer disruption to our operations if there is a failure of the database system
or the backup system. We may be required to invest significant resources in protecting against the foregoing technological disruptions,
or to remediate problems and damages caused by such incidents, which could increase the cost of our business and in turn adversely affect
our financial conditions and results of operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to expand our information technology infrastructure
in a timely and cost-effective manner to meet the increasing demands of our business growth. Any interruptions in the accessibility of
or deterioration of the quality of access to our system could reduce teachers’ and students’ satisfaction and reduce the attractiveness
of our online high school after-school tutoring courses, which would result in reduction in the number of students enrolling such
courses. Although we have not experienced any significant disruptions to or failures of our information technology systems, we cannot
assure you that such disruptions or failures will not happen in the future.
In addition, we rely
on third-party mobile application distribution channels, such as Apple’s App Store and Android application stores, to distribute
our mobile applications to students and teachers. As such, the promotion, distribution and operation of our mobile applications are subject
to such distribution channels’ standard terms and policies for application developers, which are subject to the interpretation of,
and frequent changes by, these distribution channels. If third-party app stores or any other major distribution channel interprets or
changes its standard terms and conditions in a manner that is detrimental to us in the future, or terminate its existing relationship
with us, or if any third-party infringement claims are brought against our mobile applications, our mobile applications could be temporarily
or permanently removed from such third-party mobile application distribution channels and our business, financial condition and results
of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
If we fail to adopt new technologies
that are important to our business, in particular the technology upgrades related to live broadcasting and AI, our competitive position
and ability to generate revenues may be materially and adversely affected.
The technology used in
internet and value-added telecommunications services in general, and in online education services in particular, may evolve and change
over time. We believe our technologies are core to our success and are critical to the implementation of our business model, particularly
as we strive to make significant business transitions from an online education company focused on the K-12 sector to a technology company
serving the broader education industry. In particular, implementation of technologies to improve teaching efficiency is an important part
of our online high school tutoring courses and STEAM courses, and is critical to our ability to attract new students to enroll in
such courses. As an online education company, we must anticipate and adapt to such technological changes and adopt new technologies in
a timely fashion. We also rely on our data and technology capabilities to build and maintain our platform and infrastructure. We cannot
assure you that we can keep up with the fast pace of the technology industry, and continue to develop, innovate and utilize our proprietary
capabilities. In particular, the application of technology in education is still at an early stage and under exploration. Our technologies
may become obsolete or insufficient, and we may have difficulties in following and adapting to technological changes in the online education
industry in a timely and cost-effective manner. New solutions and technologies developed and introduced by competitors could render our
technology obsolete. Developing and integrating new technologies into our existing programs and algorithms could be expensive and time-consuming.
We may not succeed in developing and incorporating new technologies at all. If we fail to continue to develop, innovate and utilize our
technologies effectively and on a timely basis, our business, financial performance and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
We may need additional capital in the
future to pursue our business objectives. If we cannot obtain additional capital on acceptable terms, or at all, our business, financial
condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
We may need to raise
additional capital to respond to business challenges or opportunities, accelerate our growth, develop new offerings or enhance our technological
capacities. Due to the unpredictable nature of the capital markets and our industry, there can be no assurance that we will be able to
raise additional capital on terms favorable to us, or at all, if and when required. To the extent we need to raise additional capital
to fund our operations and respond to business opportunities, we may not be able to do so on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Such financings
may be on terms that are dilutive or potentially dilutive to our shareholders, and the prices at which new investors would be willing
to purchase our securities may be lower than the current market price per share of our ordinary shares. The holders of new securities
may also have rights, preferences, or privileges that are senior to those of existing stockholders. If new financing sources are required,
but are insufficient or unavailable, we may need to modify our growth and operating plans and business strategies based on available funding,
if any, which would harm our ability to grow our business.
We cannot assure you that we will not
be subject to liability claims for any inappropriate or illegal content offered as part of our online courses, which could cause us to
incur legal costs and damages our reputation.
Although we implement
various content monitoring procedures, we cannot assure you that there will be no inappropriate or illegal content included in our educational
content or applications and websites. In addition, our quiz questions designed internally based on our understanding of the relevant examination
requirements may be investigated by the regulatory authorities. We may face civil, administrative or criminal liability or legal or regulatory
sanctions, such as requiring us to restrict or discontinue our content, products or services, if an individual or corporate, governmental
or other entity believes that any of our educational content or content displayed on our applications and websites violates any laws,
regulations or governmental policies or infringes upon its legal rights. Even if such a claim were not successful, defending such a claim
may cause us to incur substantial costs. Moreover, any accusation of inappropriate or illegal content in our educational content offerings
or our applications and websites could lead to significant negative publicity, which could harm our reputation, business, financial condition
and results of operations.
The recognition of our brand may be
adversely affected by any negative publicity concerning us and our business, shareholders, affiliates, directors, officers, our employees,
teachers and student service staff, as well as the industry in which we operate, regardless of its accuracy, which could harm our reputation
and business.
We believe that the market
recognition of our brand has significantly contributed to the success of our business and that maintaining and enhancing our brand recognition
is critical to sustaining our competitive advantages. Negative publicity about us and our business, shareholders, affiliates, directors,
officers, teachers, student service staff, other employees, and other part-time workers, as well as the industry in which we operate,
can harm the recognition of our brand. Negative publicity, regardless of merits, could be related to a wide variety of matters, including
but not limited to:
| ● | alleged misconduct
or other improper activities committed by our students or our shareholders, affiliates, directors,
officers, teachers, student service staff, other employees, and other part-time workers,
including misrepresentation made by our employees during sales and marketing activities,
and other fraudulent activities to artificially inflate the popularity of our products, services
or course offerings; |
| ● | false or malicious
allegations or rumors about us or our shareholders, affiliates, directors, officers, teachers,
student service staff, other employees, teaching staff and other part-time workers; |
| ● | complaints by our
students and their parents about our course offerings; |
| ● | refund disputes of
course fees or disputes relating to tuition fee installment payments between us and our students
and their parents; |
| ● | lack of required
teaching qualifications; |
| ● | security breaches
or misuse of private user or transaction data or other information; |
| ● | employment-related
claims relating to alleged employment discrimination, wage and hour violations, as well as
outsourced or flexible staffing arrangements; and |
| ● | governmental and
regulatory investigations or penalties resulting from our failure to comply with applicable
laws, regulations and policies, including those adopted by the government to apply more stringent
social, ethical and environmental standards in connection with increased global focus on
these areas. |
In addition to traditional
media, there has been an increasing use of social media platforms and similar technologies in China, including instant messaging applications,
social media websites and other forms of internet-based communications that provide individuals with access to a broad audience of consumers
and other interested persons. The availability of information on instant messaging applications and social media platforms is virtually
immediate as is its impact without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction. The opportunity for dissemination of information,
including inaccurate information, is seemingly limitless and readily available. Information concerning our company, shareholders, affiliates,
directors, officers, teachers, student service staff, other employees, and other part-time workers, may be posted on such platforms at
any time. The risks associated with any such negative publicity or incorrect or misleading information cannot be completely eliminated
or mitigated and may materially harm the recognition of our brand, reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.
Failure to make adequate contributions
to various employee benefits plans as required by PRC regulations may subject us to penalties.
Companies operating in
China are required to participate in various government-sponsored employee benefit plans, including certain social insurance, housing
funds and other welfare-oriented payment obligations, and contribute to the plans in amounts equal to certain percentages of salaries,
including bonuses and allowances, of employees up to a maximum amount specified by the local government from time to time at locations
where our employees are based. The requirement of employee benefit plans has not been implemented consistently by the local governments
in China given the different levels of economic development in different locations. To efficiently administrate the contribution of employment
benefit plans of our employees in some cities, we engage third-party agents to make the contribution for our employees. Our failure in
making contributions to various employee benefit plans and in complying with applicable PRC labor-related laws may subject us to late
payment penalties, and we could be required to make up the contributions for these plans as well as to pay late fees and fines. If we
are subject to late fees or fines in relation to the underpaid employee benefits, our financial condition and results of operations may
be adversely affected. In addition, to the extent that we can make a reasonable estimate of the liability arising from our failure in
making full contributions to various employee benefit plans, we record a related contingent liability. However, the amount of our estimates
may be inaccurate, in which case our financial condition and cash flow may be adversely affected if we were to pay late fees or fines
in relation to the underpaid employee benefits.
If our senior management and other key
personnel are unable to work together effectively or efficiently or if we lose their services, our business may be severely affected.
The continued services
of our senior management and other key personnel are important to our continued success. In particular, we rely on the expertise and experience
of Mr. Yi Zhang, our founder, chairman and CEO. We also rely on the experience and services from other senior management. If we lose
any of such senior management, we might not be able to replace them easily or at all, and our business, financial condition and results
of operations may be materially and adversely affected. Since our initial public offering, our senior management has experienced certain
personnel changes. Competition for experienced management personnel in the online education industry is intense, the pool of qualified
candidates is limited, and we may not be able to retain the services of our senior executives or key personnel, or to attract and retain
high-quality senior executives or key personnel in the future. If any of our senior management joins a competitor or forms a competing
business, we may lose students, teaching staff, and other key professionals and staff members. Our senior management has entered into
employment agreements with us which contain confidentiality and non-compete clauses. However, if any dispute arises between
our senior management and us, we may have to incur substantial costs and expenses in order to enforce such agreements in China or we may
be unable to enforce them at all. As we have been a private company since our inception, our senior management also has limited experience
in managing internal control, financial reporting, and other regulatory and compliance matters of a public company.
Our success also depends
on our having highly trained content and product development, financial, technical, human resource, sales and marketing staff, management
personnel and qualified and dedicated teachers and student service staff. We will need to continue to hire additional personnel as our
business grows. A shortage in the supply of personnel with requisite skills or our failure to recruit them could impede our ability to
increase revenues from our existing courses, products and services, to launch new offerings and to expand our operations, and would have
an adverse effect on our business and financial results.
We have granted, and expect to continue
to grant, share-based awards under our share incentive plan, which may result in increased share-based compensation expenses.
We adopted share incentive
plans in 2018 and 2021, or the 2018 Plan and the 2021 Plan, respectively, for the purpose of granting share-based compensation awards
to employees, officers, directors and consultants to incentivize their performance and promote the success of our business. The maximum
aggregate number of ordinary shares that may be issued under the 2018 Plan and the 2021 Plan is 93,082,225 ordinary shares and 38,000,000
ordinary shares, respectively. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—6.B. Compensation—Share Incentive
Plan.” We recorded RMB20.5 million, RMB42.3 million and RMB9.1 million (US$1.3 million) in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively,
in share-based compensation expenses. We expect to continue to grant awards under our share incentive plan, which we believe is of significant
importance to our ability to attract and retain key personnel and employees. As a result, our expenses associated with share-based compensation
may increase, which may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
We are subject to risks related to third-party
payment processing.
We accept payments through
major third-party online payment channels in China. We may also be susceptible to fraud, user data leakage and other illegal activities
in connection with the various payment methods we offer. In addition, our business depends on the billing, payment and escrow systems
of the third-party payment service providers to maintain accurate records of payments by customers and collect such payments. If the quality,
utility, convenience or attractiveness of these payment processing and escrow services declines, or if we have to change the pattern of
using these payment services for any reason, the attractiveness of our company could be materially and adversely affected. We are also
subject to various rules, regulations and requirements, regulatory or otherwise, governing electronic funds transfers which could change
or be reinterpreted to make it difficult or impossible for us to comply. If we fail to comply with these rules or requirements, we may
be subject to fines and higher transaction fees and become unable to accept the current online payments solutions from our customers,
and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Business involving online
payment services is subject to a number of risks that could materially and adversely affect third-party online payment service providers’
ability to provide payment processing and escrow services to us, including:
| ● | dissatisfaction with these online payment services or decreased
use of their services; |
| ● | increasing competition, including from other established
Chinese internet companies, payment service providers and companies engaged in other financial technology services; |
| ● | changes to rules or practices applicable to payment systems
that link to third-party online payment service providers; |
| ● | breach of customers’ personal information and concerns
over the use and security of information collected from buyers; |
| ● | service outages, system failures or failures to effectively
scale the system to handle large and growing transaction volumes; |
| ● | increasing costs to third-party online payment service providers,
including fees charged by banks to process transactions through online payment channels, which would also increase our costs of revenues;
and |
| ● | failure to manage funds accurately or loss of funds, whether
due to employee fraud, security breaches, technical errors or otherwise. |
Our brand image, business and results of operations may be adversely
impacted by misconduct, improper activities and misuse of our product and service offerings by students, teaching staff and employees,
many of which are beyond our control.
Our teachers and student service staff engage
in real-time communications with our students. Our courses undergo multiple rounds of internal review and pilot testing before being broadly
released. We regularly and actively monitor our live courses, chat messages and other content and communications on our platform to ensure
that we are able to identify content that may be deemed inappropriate or in violation of laws, regulations and government policies. When
any inappropriate or illegal content is identified, we promptly remove the content. However, since we have limited control over the real-time
and offline activities of our students and teaching staff, to the extent any improper behavior is associated with our content, applications
or websites, our ability to protect our brand image and reputation may be limited. In addition, if any of our students or teaching staff
suffer or allege to have suffered physical, financial or emotional harm following contact initiated through our content, applications
or websites, we may face civil lawsuits or other liabilities initiated by the affected individual or governmental or regulatory actions
against us. In response to allegations of illegal or inappropriate activities conducted on our applications or websites or any negative
media coverage about us, PRC governmental authorities may intervene and hold us liable for non-compliance with PRC laws and regulations
concerning the dissemination of information on the internet and subject us to administrative penalties or other sanctions, such as requiring
us to restrict or discontinue some of the content, features and services provided through our applications or websites. As a result, our
business may suffer and our brand image, student and teacher base, results of operations and financial condition may be materially and
adversely affected.
We are exposed to the risk of other types of employee
fraud or other misconduct. Other types of employee misconduct include, but are not limited to, intentionally failing to comply with government
regulations, engaging in unauthorized activities when interacting with our students and during the course of their work, such as mishandling
student records and data, and making misrepresentation to our prospective students during marketing activities, all of which could harm
our business and reputation. It is not always possible to deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect
this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses, which could harm our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Increases in labor costs and compliance with stricter labor laws
in the PRC may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
The currently effective PRC Labor Contract Law
took effect from January 1, 2008 and was later amended on December 28, 2012. The PRC Labor Contract Law has reinforced the protection
of employees who, under the PRC Labor Contract Law, have the right, among others, to have written employment contracts, to enter into
employment contracts with no fixed term under certain circumstances, to receive overtime wages and to terminate or alter terms in labor
contracts. Furthermore, the PRC Labor Contract Law sets forth additional restrictions and increases the costs involved with dismissing
employees. To the extent that we need to significantly reduce our workforce, the PRC Labor Contract Law could adversely affect our ability
to do so in a timely and cost-effective manner, and our results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, for employees
whose employment contracts include noncompetition terms, the PRC Labor Contract Law requires us to pay monthly compensation after such
employment is terminated, which will increase our operating expenses. Because the PRC governmental authorities have introduced various
new labor-related regulations since the PRC Labor Contract Law took effect, and the interpretation and implementation of these regulations
are still evolving, our employment practices could violate the PRC Labor Contract Law and related regulations and could be subject to
related penalties, fines or legal fees. If we are subject to severe penalties or incur significant legal fees in connection with labor
law disputes or investigations, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
We cannot preclude the possibility that these
workers supplied by third-party service providers may be classified as “dispatched workers” or our employees by courts, arbitration
tribunals or government agencies. PRC labor laws and regulations impose stringent requirements on the use of employees of temp agencies,
who are known in China as “dispatched workers.” For example, the number of dispatched workers may not exceed 10% of its total
number of employees and the dispatched workers can only engage in temporary, auxiliary or substitutable work. However, since the application
and interpretation of the PRC Labor Contract Law and other related laws and regulations are limited and uncertain, we cannot assure you
our business operation will be deemed to be in full compliance with them. If we are found to be in violation of any requirements under
the Labor Contract Law, the Interim Provisions on Labor Dispatch or their related rules and regulations, we may be ordered by the labor
authority to rectify the non-compliance by entering into written employment contracts with the deemed “dispatched workers,”
or be subject to regulatory penalty, other sanction or liability or be subject to labor disputes.
Our results of operations are subject to seasonal fluctuations.
Our industry generally experiences seasonality,
reflecting a combination of traditional education industry patterns and new patterns associated with the online platform in particular.
Seasonal fluctuations have affected, and are likely to continue to affect, our business. We generally generate higher net revenues in
the second and fourth quarters in a given year because of the increased paid student enrollments for the spring and fall semesters. Overall,
the historical seasonality of our business has been relatively mild due to our rapid growth, but seasonality may increase in the future.
The seasonal trends that we have experienced in the past may not be indicative of our future operating results. Our financial condition
and results of operations for future periods may continue to fluctuate. As a result, the trading price of our ADSs may fluctuate from
time to time due to seasonality.
If we cannot maintain our corporate culture as we grow, we could
lose the innovation, collaboration and focus that contribute to our business.
We believe that a critical component of our success
is our corporate culture, which fosters innovation and has roots in a deep understanding of our students, teachers as well as the evolving
education industry in China. As we continue to expand and grow our business, we may find it difficult to maintain these valuable aspects
of our corporate culture. Any failure to preserve our culture could undermine our reputation in the marketplace and negatively impact
our ability to attract and retain employees and students, which would in turn jeopardize our future success.
We may be the subject of detrimental conduct by third parties
such as our competitors, including complaints to regulatory agencies and the public dissemination of malicious assessments of our business,
which could have a negative impact on our reputation and cause us to lose market share, students and revenues, and adversely affect the
price of our ADSs.
We have been, and in the future may be, the target
of anti-competitive, harassing or other detrimental conduct by third parties including our competitors. Such conduct may include complaints,
anonymous or otherwise, to regulatory agencies regarding our operations, accounting, business relationships, business prospects and business
ethics. Additionally, allegations, directly or indirectly against us, may be posted online by anyone, whether or not related to us, on
an anonymous basis. We may be subject to government or regulatory investigation as a result of such third-party conduct and may be required
to expend significant time and incur substantial costs to address such third-party conduct, and there is no assurance that we will be
able to conclusively refute each of the allegations within a reasonable period of time, or at all. Our reputation may also be materially
negatively affected as a result of the public dissemination of anonymous allegations or malicious statements about our business, which
in turn may cause us to lose students and revenues, and adversely affect the price of our ADSs.
We face risks related to natural and other disasters, health
epidemics, and other extraordinary events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which could significantly disrupt our operations.
Our business could be materially and adversely
affected by natural disasters, other health epidemics or other public safety concerns affecting the PRC, and particularly Shanghai. Natural
disasters may give rise to server interruptions, breakdowns, system failures, technology platform failures, internet failures or other
operation interruptions for us and our service providers, which could cause the loss or corruption of data or malfunction of software
or hardware as well as adversely affect our ability and the ability of our service providers to conduct daily operations and to deliver
our products and course offerings. Our business could also be adversely affected if employees of ours or our service providers are affected
by health epidemics. In addition, our results of operations could be adversely affected to the extent that any health epidemic harms the
Chinese economy in general.
The COVID-19 outbreak has created unique global
and industry-wide challenges, including challenges to our business. In early 2020, the COVID-19 outbreak resulted in the temporary closure
of many corporate offices and schools across China. Given the strict quarantine measures put in place during this period, normal economic
activity throughout China was sharply curtailed and normal in-school education was temporarily suspended. Substantially all of our revenues
and our workforce are concentrated in China. Consequently, to the extent that COVID-19 exerts long-term negative impact on the Chinese
economy, our results of operations and financial performance may be adversely affected.
While the outbreak of COVID-19 has come under
control in the PRC since the second quarter of 2020, there was a significant rise in COVID-19 cases, including the COVID-19 Delta and
Omicron variant cases, in various cities in China in early 2022. The local governments of the affected cities, including Shanghai, have
reinstated certain COVID-related measures, including travel restrictions and stay-at-home orders. Since we lease offices in certain Chinese
cities to support our online after-school tutoring service operation, research and development and daily operations, the COVID-19 outbreak
caused temporary office closures and rotation arrangements, resulting in lower work efficiency and productivity. We also incurred insignificant
costs in relation to the measures we took to contain the impact of the COVID outbreak, including purchasing personal protective equipment,
upgrading our technology system to support the growth in online courses, monitoring our employees’ health, and rotation arrangements
to avoid infection transmission. As China relaxes its “zero-COVID” policy, there has been a significant surge of COVID-19
cases in China. Future lockdowns or other restrictive measures that may be imposed, especially those imposed in major cities where we
have a significant presence, may have a material impact on our operations and financial condition. The future impact of the pandemic remains
highly uncertain and it may continue to adversely affect our revenues for an uncertain period of time. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts
our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in future periods will depend on the future developments of the COVID-19
outbreak, including any potential future variants of the virus, the effectiveness of the mass vaccination programs, the development in
medical treatment and other actions taken to contain its spread, which are highly uncertain and unpredictable. If there is not a material
recovery in the COVID-19 situation, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Our headquarters are located in Shanghai. Most
of our system hardware and back-up systems are hosted in facilities located in China and most of our service providers are located in
China. Consequently, if any natural disasters, health epidemics or other public safety concerns were to affect Shanghai, our operation
may experience material disruptions, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We currently have no business insurance coverage, which could
expose us to significant costs and business disruption.
We do not maintain any liability insurance or
property insurance policies covering students, equipment and facilities for injuries, death or losses due to fire, earthquake, flood or
any other disaster. Consistent with customary industry practice in China, we do not maintain business interruption insurance, nor do we
maintain key-man life insurance. We have determined that the costs of insuring for these risks and the difficulties associated with acquiring
such insurance on commercially reasonable terms make it impractical for us to have such insurance. Any uninsured business disruptions
may result in our incurring substantial costs and the diversion of resources, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations
and financial condition.
If we fail to develop and maintain an effective
system of internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately or report our financial results or prevent fraud
on a timely basis, and investor confidence and the trading price of our ADSs may be materially and adversely impacted.
In the course of auditing our consolidated financial
statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, we and our independent registered public accounting firms
identified one material weakness and other control deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. As defined in the
standards established by the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, a “material weakness” is a deficiency, or combination
of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The material weakness that has been identified
relates to lack of sufficient skilled staff with U.S. GAAP knowledge for the purpose of financial reporting and lack of formal accounting
policies and procedures manual to ensure proper financial reporting to comply with U.S. GAAP and SEC requirements. The material weakness,
if not timely remedied, may lead to significant misstatements in our consolidated financial statements in the future. Neither we nor
our independent registered public accounting firm undertook a comprehensive assessment of our internal control for purposes of identifying
and reporting material weakness and other control deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. Had we performed a formal
assessment of our internal control over financial reporting or had our independent registered public accounting firm performed an audit
of our internal control over financial reporting, additional deficiencies may have been identified.
Following the identification of the material
weakness, we have taken measures and plan to continue to take measures to remediate these control deficiencies. See “Item 15.
Controls and Procedures—Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” However, the
implementation of these measures may not fully address the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, and
we cannot conclude that they have been fully remediated. Our failure to correct the material weakness or our failure to discover and
address any other deficiencies could result in inaccuracies in our financial statements and impair our ability to comply with
applicable financial reporting requirements and related regulatory filings on a timely basis.
We have become a public company in the United
States subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, requires that we include
a report from management on our internal control over financial reporting in our annual report on Form 20-F beginning with our annual
report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. In addition, once we cease to be an “emerging growth company” as such
term is defined in the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting. Our management may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective.
Moreover, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent registered
public accounting firm, after conducting its own independent testing, may issue a report that is qualified if it is not satisfied with
our internal control over financial reporting or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if
it interprets the relevant requirements differently from us. In addition, as a result of becoming a public company, our reporting obligations
may place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources and systems for the foreseeable future. We may be
unable to timely complete our evaluation testing and any required remediation.
During the course of documenting and testing our
internal control procedures, in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404, we may identify other or more material weakness or deficiencies
in our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, if we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial
reporting, as these standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis
that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. Generally speaking, if we fail to achieve
and maintain an effective internal control environment, we could suffer material misstatements in our financial statements and fail to
meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could
in turn limit our access to capital markets, harm our results of operations and lead to a decline in the trading price of our ADSs. Additionally,
ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions. We may
also be required to restate our consolidated financial statements for prior periods.
We will incur increased costs as a result of being a public company.
We are a public company and expect to incur significant
legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently
implemented by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, impose various requirements on the corporate governance practices of public companies.
As a company with less than US$1.235 billion in revenues for our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company”
pursuant to the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements that are
otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include exemption from the auditor attestation requirement under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, in the assessment of the emerging growth company’s internal control
over financial reporting. The JOBS Act also permits an emerging growth company to delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until
such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of such transition period.
We expect these rules and regulations to increase
our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some corporate activities more time-consuming and costly. After we are no longer
an “emerging growth company,” we expect to incur significant expenses and devote substantial management effort toward ensuring
compliance with the requirements of Section 404 and the other rules and regulations of the SEC. For example, as a result of becoming a
public company, we will need to increase the number of independent directors and adopt policies regarding internal controls and disclosure
controls and procedures. We also expect that operating as a public company will make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain
director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher
costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. In addition, we will incur additional costs associated with our public company reporting
requirements. It may also be more difficult for us to find qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors or as executive officers.
We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules and regulations, and we cannot predict or estimate
with any degree of certainty the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.
Our operations depend on the performance of the internet infrastructure
and telecommunications networks in China.
The successful operation of our business depends
on the performance of the internet infrastructure and telecommunications networks in China. Almost all access to the internet is maintained
through state-owned telecommunications operators under the administrative control and regulatory supervision of the MIIT. Moreover, we
have entered into contracts with various subsidiaries of a limited number of telecommunications service providers at provincial level
and rely on them to provide us with data communications capacity through local telecommunications lines. We have limited access to alternative
networks or services in the event of disruptions, failures or other problems with China’s internet infrastructure or the telecommunications
networks provided by telecommunications service providers. We regularly serve a large number of students and teachers. With the expansion
of our business, we may be required to upgrade our technology and infrastructure to keep up with the increasing traffic on our online
applications and websites. However, we have no control over the costs of the services provided by telecommunications service providers.
If the prices we pay for telecommunications and internet services rise significantly, our results of operations may be materially and
adversely affected. If internet access fees or other charges to internet users increase, our user traffic may decline and our business
may be harmed.
We may not be able to achieve the benefits we expect from future
investments and acquisitions.
We may make equity investments in or acquisitions
of additional businesses, assets and technologies that complement our existing business in the future. This may include opportunities
to expand our offerings and strengthen our technology and data capabilities. If the businesses or assets we acquire or invest in do not
subsequently generate the anticipated financial performance or if any goodwill impairment test triggering event occurs, we may need to
revalue or write down the value of goodwill and other intangible assets in connection with such acquisitions or investments, which would
harm our results of operations. In addition, investments and acquisitions could result in the use of substantial amounts of cash, potentially
dilutive issuances of equity securities, significant amortization expenses related to intangible assets, significant diversion of management
attention and exposure to potential unknown liabilities of the acquired business. In addition, if we make equity investments in the future,
we cannot ensure that these companies will always comply with applicable laws and regulations in their business operations. Material non-compliance
by our investees may cause substantial harms to our reputations and the value of our investment. In addition, we may be unable to identify
appropriate acquisition or strategic investment targets when it is necessary or desirable to make such acquisition or investment to remain
competitive or to expand our business. Even if we identify an appropriate acquisition or investment target, we may not be able to successfully
negotiate the terms of the acquisition or investment, finance the proposed transaction or integrate the relevant businesses into our existing
business and operations. In the event that our investments and acquisitions are not successful, our results of operations and financial
condition may be materially and adversely affected.
Increasing focus with respect to environmental, social and governance
matters may impose additional costs on us or expose us to additional risks. Failure to comply with the laws and regulations on environmental,
social and governance matters may subject us to penalties and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation.
The PRC government and public advocacy groups
have been increasingly focused on environment, social and governance, or ESG, issues in recent years, making our business more sensitive
to ESG issues and changes in governmental policies and laws and regulations associated with environment protection and other ESG-related
matters. Investor advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, investment funds, and other influential investors are also increasingly
focused on ESG practices and in recent years have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments.
Regardless of the industry, increased focus from investors and the PRC government on ESG and similar matters may hinder access to capital,
as investors may decide to reallocate capital or to not commit capital as a result of their assessment of a company’s ESG practices.
In the PRC, there are comprehensive environmental regulations and policies governing electronic product manufacturing in general, and
the PRC may adopt more stringent standards in terms of ESG matters in the future. Any ESG concern or issue could increase our regulatory
compliance costs. If we do not adapt to or comply with the evolving expectations and standards on ESG matters from investors and the PRC
government or are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, regardless of whether there is
a legal requirement to do so, we may suffer from reputational damage and the business, financial condition, and the price of our ADSs
could be materially and adversely effected.
A severe and prolonged global economic recession and the slowdown
in the Chinese economy may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
COVID-19 had a severe and negative impact on the
Chinese and the global economy. Even before the outbreak of COVID-19, the global macroeconomic environment was facing numerous challenges.
The growth rate of the Chinese economy had already been slowing since 2012 compared to the previous decade and the trend may continue.
There is considerable uncertainty over the long-term effects of the expansionary monetary and fiscal policies which had been adopted by
the central banks and financial authorities of some of the world’s leading economies, including the United States and China. Unrest,
terrorist threats and the potential for war in the Middle East and elsewhere may increase market volatility across the globe. There have
also been concerns about the relationship between China and other countries, including the surrounding Asian countries, which may potentially
have economic effects. In particular, there is significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and China
with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs. It is unclear whether these challenges and uncertainties
will be contained or resolved and what effects they may have on the global political and economic conditions in the long term. Economic
conditions in China are sensitive to global economic conditions, as well as changes in domestic economic and political policies and the
expected or perceived overall economic growth rate in China. Any severe or prolonged slowdown in the global or Chinese economy may materially
and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material and adverse
effect on the value of your investment and our results of operations.
The conversion of Renminbi into foreign currencies,
including the U.S. dollar, is based on rates set by the People’s Bank of China. The Renminbi has fluctuated against the U.S. dollar
and other currencies, at times significantly and unpredictably. The value of Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies is
affected by changes in China’s political and economic conditions and by China’s foreign exchange policies, among other things.
We cannot assure you that Renminbi will not appreciate or depreciate significantly in value against the U.S. dollar and other currencies
in the future. It is difficult to predict how market forces or PRC or U.S. government policy may impact the exchange rate between Renminbi
and U.S. dollar in the future.
Significant revaluation of the Renminbi may have
a material and adverse effect on your investment. For example, to the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars we receive from the
initial public offering into Renminbi for our operations, appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would have an adverse effect
on the Renminbi amount we would receive from the conversion. Conversely, if we decide to convert our Renminbi into U.S. dollars for the
purpose of making payments for dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs or for other business purposes, appreciation of the U.S. dollar
against the Renminbi would have a negative effect on the U.S. dollar amount available to us.
Very limited hedging options are available in
China to reduce our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. We have entered into certain hedging transactions, including foreign exchange
forward contracts and foreign currency option contracts, in an effort to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. See “Item
11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Foreign exchange risk.” While we may continue to enter into
hedging transactions in the future, the availability and effectiveness of these hedges may be limited and we may not be able to adequately
hedge our exposure, or at all. In addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict
our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currency.
We face certain risks relating to the real properties that we
lease.
We lease real properties from third
parties primarily for our office in China, and the lease agreements for most of these leased properties have not been registered with
the PRC government authorities as required by PRC law. Although the failure to do so does not in itself invalidate the leases, we may
be ordered by the PRC government authorities to rectify such noncompliance and, if such noncompliance were not rectified within a given
period of time, we may be subject to fines imposed by PRC government authorities ranging from RMB1,000 and RMB10,000 for those of our
lease agreements that have not been registered with the relevant PRC government authorities. As of the date of this annual report, we
are not aware of any regulatory or governmental actions, claims or investigations being contemplated or any challenges by third parties
to our use of our leased properties the lease agreements of which have not been registered with the government authorities. However, we
cannot assure you that the government authorities will not impose fines on us due to our failure to register any of our lease agreements,
which may negatively impact our financial condition.
In addition, some of the ownership certificates
or other similar proof of certain leased properties have not been provided to us by the relevant lessors. Therefore, we cannot assure
you that such lessors are entitled to lease the relevant real properties to us. If the lessors are not entitled to lease the real properties
to us and the owners of such real properties decline to ratify the lease agreements between us and the respective lessors, we may not
be able to enforce our rights to lease such properties under the respective lease agreements against the owners. As of the date of this
annual report, we are not aware of any claim or challenge brought by any third parties concerning the use of our leased properties without
obtaining proper ownership proof. If our lease agreements are claimed as null and void by third parties who are the real owners of such
leased real properties, we could be required to vacate the properties, in the event of which we could only initiate the claim against
the lessors under relevant lease agreements for indemnities for their breach of the relevant leasing agreements. We cannot assure you
that suitable alternative locations are readily available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and if we are unable to relocate
our operations in a timely manner, our operations may be interrupted.
Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure
There are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation
and application of current and future PRC laws, regulations, and rules relating to the agreements that establish the VIE structure for
our operations in China, including potential future actions by the PRC government, which could affect the enforceability of our contractual
arrangements with the VIE and, consequently, significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations performance. If the
PRC government finds that the agreements that establish the structure for operating certain of our operations in China do not comply with
PRC regulations relating to the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the
future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations.
Foreign ownership in entities that provide value-added
telecommunication services (except for e-commerce, domestic multi-party communications, store-and-forward and call center), such as provision
of online course content, is subject to restrictions under current PRC laws and regulations. Specifically, foreign ownership of an internet
information service provider may not exceed 50%. We are an exempted company
with limited liability in the Cayman Islands. Shanghai Zhangxinrui, or our wholly foreign owned entity, or our WFOE, is our PRC subsidiary
and foreign-invested enterprise under PRC laws. To comply with PRC laws and regulations, we conduct such business activities in China
through Shanghai Zhangda, which is the VIE. Our WFOE has entered into a series of contractual arrangements with our VIE and its shareholder.
For a description of these contractual arrangements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.C. Organizational Structure—Contractual
Arrangements with The VIE and The VIE’s Shareholder.” As a result of these contractual arrangements, we exert control over
the VIE and consolidate financial results of the VIE in our financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The VIE holds the licenses, approvals
and key assets that are essential for our operations.
If the PRC government finds that our contractual
arrangements do not comply with its restrictions on foreign investment in the value-added telecommunication services, or if the PRC government
otherwise find that we are in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations or lack the necessary permits or licenses to
operate our business, the relevant governmental authorities would have broad discretion in dealing with such violation, including, without
limitation:
| ● | revoking the business licenses and/or operating licenses
of such entities; |
| ● | confiscating any of our income that they deem to be obtained
through illegal operations; |
| ● | discontinuing or placing restrictions or onerous conditions
on our operations; |
| ● | placing restrictions on our right to collect revenues; and |
| ● | shutting down our servers or blocking our application/software. |
Any
of these events could cause significant disruption to our business operations and severely damage our reputation, which would in turn
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, new PRC laws, regulations, and
rules may be promulgated with additional requirements, which will pose additional challenges to our corporate structure and contractual
arrangements. For example, the General Office of State Council and the General Office of Central Committee of the Communist Party of China
jointly promulgated the Alleviating Burden Opinion on July 24, 2021, which provides, among others, that (i) Academic AST Institutions
are prohibited from raising funds by listing on stock markets or conducting any capitalization activities; (ii) foreign capital is prohibited
from controlling or participating in any Academic AST Institutions through mergers and acquisitions, entrusted operation, joining franchise
or variable interest entities; (iii) online tutoring for preschool-age children is prohibited, and offline academic subjects (including
foreign language) tutoring services for preschool-age children is also strictly prohibited. The Alleviating Burden Opinion provides that
any violation of the foregoing shall be rectified.
We
have conducted a series of compliance measures regarding the Alleviating Burden Opinion and relevant implements, such as disposal of the
K-12 Business. We may take further necessary measures to comply with the current and future PRC laws and regulations. However, there are
substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future PRC laws and regulations. If occurrences
of any of these events results in our inability to direct the activities of the VIE in China that most significantly impact its economic
performance, and/or our failure to receive the economic benefits from our consolidated variable interest entities, we may not be able
to consolidate their financial results in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
We rely on contractual arrangements with the VIE and its shareholder
for our business operations, which may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing operational control.
We
have relied and expect to continue to rely on contractual arrangements with the VIE, and its shareholder to operate our business in China.
These contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership in providing us with control over the VIE. For example, the
VIE and its shareholder could breach their contractual arrangements with us by, among other things, failing to conduct the operations
of the VIE in an acceptable manner or taking other actions that are detrimental to our interests.
If
we had direct ownership of the VIE in China, we would be able to exercise our rights as a shareholder to effect changes in the board of
directors of the VIE, which in turn could implement changes, subject to any applicable fiduciary obligations, at the management and operational
level. However, under the current contractual arrangements, we rely on the performance by the VIE and its shareholder of their obligations
under the contracts to exercise control over the VIE. The shareholder of the VIE may not act in the best interests of our company or may
not perform his obligations under these contracts. Such risks exist throughout the period in which we intend to operate certain portion
of our business through the contractual arrangements with the VIE. If any dispute relating to these contracts remains unresolved, we will
have to enforce our rights under these contracts through the operations of PRC law and arbitration, litigation and other legal proceedings
and therefore will be subject to uncertainties in the PRC legal system. See “—Any failure by the VIE or its shareholder to
perform their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material and adverse effect on our business.”
Therefore, our contractual arrangements with the VIE may not be as effective in ensuring our control over the relevant portion of our
business operations as direct ownership would be.
Any failure by the VIE or its shareholder to perform their obligations
under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material and adverse effect on our business.
If
the VIE or its shareholder fail to perform their respective obligations under the contractual arrangements, we may have to incur substantial
costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. We may also have to rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including
seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and contractual remedies, which we cannot assure you will be sufficient or effective
under PRC law. For example, if the shareholder of the VIE were to refuse to transfer their equity interests in the VIE to us or our designee
if we exercise the purchase option pursuant to these contractual arrangements, or if he were otherwise to act in bad faith toward us,
then we may have to take legal actions to compel him to perform his contractual obligations.
All
the agreements under our contractual arrangements are governed by PRC law and provide for the resolution of disputes through arbitration
in China. Accordingly, these contracts would be interpreted in accordance with PRC law and any disputes would be resolved in accordance
with PRC legal procedures. The legal system in the PRC is not as developed as in some other jurisdictions, such as the United States.
As a result, uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. Meanwhile, there
are very few precedents and little formal guidance as to how contractual arrangements in the context of a consolidated variable interest
entity should be interpreted or enforced under PRC law. There remain significant uncertainties regarding the ultimate outcome of such
arbitration should legal action become necessary. In addition, under PRC law, rulings by arbitrators are final, parties cannot appeal
the arbitration results in courts, and if the losing parties fail to carry out the arbitration awards within a prescribed time limit,
the prevailing parties may only enforce the arbitration awards in PRC courts through arbitration award recognition proceedings, which
would require additional expenses and delay. In the event we are unable to enforce these contractual arrangements, or if we suffer significant
delay or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements, we may not be able to exert effective control over
the VIE, and our ability to conduct our business may be negatively affected. See “—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China—Uncertainties
in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to you and us.”
The shareholder of the VIE may have actual or potential conflicts
of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business and financial condition.
The
shareholder of the VIE may have actual or potential conflicts of interest with us. The shareholder may breach, or cause the VIE to breach,
or refuse to renew, the existing contractual arrangements we have with them and the VIE, which would have a material and adverse effect
on our ability to effectively control the VIE and receive economic benefits from it. For example, the shareholder may be able to cause
our agreements with the VIE to be performed in a manner adverse to us by, among other things, failing to remit payments due under the
contractual arrangements to us on a timely basis. We cannot assure you that when conflicts of interest arise the shareholder will act
in the best interests of our company or such conflicts will be resolved in our favor.
Currently,
we do not have any arrangements to address potential conflicts of interest between the shareholder and our company, except that we could
exercise our purchase option under the exclusive option agreements with the shareholder to request him to transfer all of his equity interests
in the VIE to a PRC entity or individual designated by us, to the extent permitted by PRC law. For individuals who are also our directors
and officers, we rely on them to abide by the laws of the Cayman Islands, which provide that directors and officers owe a fiduciary duty
to the company that requires them to act in good faith and in what they believe to be the best interests of the company and not to use
their position for personal gains. The shareholder of our VIE have executed powers of attorney to appoint our WFOE or a person designated
by our WFOE to vote on his behalf and exercise voting rights as shareholder of our respective VIE. If we cannot resolve any conflict of
interest or dispute between us and the shareholder of the VIE, we would have to rely on legal proceedings, which could result in disruption
of our business and subject us to substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.
Contractual arrangements in relation to the VIE may be subject
to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and they may determine that we or our PRC consolidated variable interest entities owe additional
taxes, which could negatively affect our financial condition and the value of your investment.
Under
applicable PRC laws and regulations, arrangements and transactions among related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC
tax authorities. We could face material and adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the contractual arrangements
in relation to the VIE were not entered into on an arm’s length basis in such a way as to result in an impermissible reduction in
taxes under applicable PRC laws, rules and regulations, and adjust income of the VIE in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer
pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in a reduction of expense deductions recorded by the VIE for PRC tax purposes, which
could in turn increase their tax liabilities without reducing corresponding PRC subsidiary’s tax expenses. In addition, the PRC
tax authorities may impose late payment fees and other penalties on the VIE for the adjusted but unpaid taxes according to the applicable
regulations. Our financial position could be materially and adversely affected if the VIE’s tax liabilities increase or if they
are required to pay late payment fees and other penalties.
Our current corporate structure and business operations may be
affected by the Foreign Investment Law and its Implementation Rules.
On
March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress promulgated the Foreign Investment Law, which took effect on January 1, 2020. Since
it is relatively new, uncertainties exist in relation to its interpretation and implementation. The Foreign Investment Law does not explicitly
classify whether variable interest entities that are controlled through contractual arrangements would be deemed as foreign invested enterprises
if they are ultimately “controlled” by foreign investors. However, it has a catch-all provision under definition of “foreign
investment” that includes investments made by foreign investors in China through other means as provided by laws, administrative
regulations or the State Council. Therefore it still leaves leeway for future laws, administrative regulations or provisions of the State
Council to provide for contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, and it remains uncertain whether our contractual arrangements
will be deemed to be in violation of the market access requirements for foreign investment in the PRC and if yes, how our contractual
arrangements should be dealt with.
The
Foreign Investment Law grants national treatment to foreign-invested entities, except for those foreign- invested entities that operate
in industries specified as either “restricted” or “prohibited” from foreign investment in the Special Administrative
Measures (Negative List) for Foreign Investment Access jointly promulgated by Ministry of Commerce, or MOFCOM, and the National Development
and Reform Commission as amended from time to time. The Foreign Investment Law provides that foreign-invested entities are barred from
operating in “prohibited” industries and will require market entry clearance and other approvals from relevant PRC government
authorities if operating in “prohibited” industries. On December 26, 2019, the Supreme People’s Court issued the Interpretations
on Certain Issues Regarding the Application of Foreign Investment Law, or the FIL Interpretations, which came into effect on January 1,
2020. In accordance with the FIL Interpretations, any claim to invalidate an investment agreement will be supported by courts if such
agreement is found to be entered into for purposes of making investments in the “prohibited industries” under the negative
list or for purposes of investing in “restricted industries” while failing to satisfy the conditions set out in the Negative
List. If our control over the VIE through contractual arrangements are deemed as foreign investment in the future, and any business of
the VIE is “restricted” or “prohibited” from foreign investment under the “negative list” effective
at the time, we may be deemed to be in violation of the Foreign Investment Law, the contractual arrangements that allow us to have control
over the VIE may be deemed as invalid and illegal, and we may be required to unwind such contractual arrangements and/or restructure our
business operations, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our business operation.
Furthermore,
if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions mandate further actions to be taken by companies with respect to existing contractual
arrangements, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all. Failure
to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with any of these or similar regulatory compliance challenges could materially and adversely
affect our current corporate structure and business operations.
We may lose the ability to use and enjoy assets held by the VIE
that are material to the operation of certain portion of our business if the entities go bankrupt or become subject to a dissolution or
liquidation proceeding.
As
part of our contractual arrangements with the VIE, the VIE holds certain assets that are material to the operation of certain portion
of our business, including licenses, permits, domain names and most of our IP rights. If the VIE goes bankrupt and all or part of their
assets become subject to liens or rights of third-party creditors, we may be unable to continue some or all of our business activities,
which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Under the contractual arrangements,
the VIE may not, in any manner, sell, transfer, mortgage or dispose of their assets or legal or beneficial interests in the business without
our prior consent. If the VIE undergoes a voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceeding, the independent third-party creditors may claim
rights to some or all of these assets, thereby hindering our ability to operate our business, which could materially and adversely affect
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Recently introduced economic substance legislation of the Cayman
Islands may adversely impact us or our operations.
The
Cayman Islands, together with several other non-European Union jurisdictions, has recently introduced legislation aimed at addressing
concerns raised by the Council of the European Union as to offshore structures engaged in certain activities which attract profits without
real economic activity. With effect from January 1, 2019, the International Tax Co-operation (Economic Substance) Law, 2018, or the Substance
Law, and issued Regulations and Guidance Notes came into force in the Cayman Islands introducing certain economic substance requirements
for “relevant entities” which are engaged in certain “relevant activities,” which in the case of exempted companies
incorporated before January 1, 2019, will apply in respect of financial years commencing July 1, 2019 and onwards. A “relevant entity”
includes an exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands; however, it does not include an entity that is tax resident outside the
Cayman Islands. Accordingly, for so long as we are a tax resident in China (being a jurisdiction outside the Cayman Islands), we are not
required to satisfy the economic substance test. Although it is presently anticipated that the Substance Law will have little material
impact on us and our operations, as the legislation is new and remains subject to further clarification and interpretation it is not currently
possible to ascertain the precise impact of these legislative changes on us and our operations.
Changes in China’s or global economic, political or social
conditions or government policies could have a material adverse effect on overall economic growth in China, which could materially and
adversely affect our business.
Substantially
all of our operations are conducted in China, and most of our assets are located in China. Accordingly, our business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects may be influenced to a significant degree by economic, political and social conditions in China generally.
The PRC economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects, including the level of development, growth rate,
level of government involvement and control of foreign exchange and allocation of resources. The PRC government exercises significant
control over China’s economic growth through allocating resources, controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations,
setting monetary policy, and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. In addition, the PRC government continues
to play a significant role in regulating industry development by imposing relevant industrial policies.
While
the PRC economy has experienced significant growth over the past decades, growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various
sectors of the economy. In addition, the rate of growth has been slowing since 2012, and the impact of COVID-19 on the Chinese and global
economies is likely to be severe. Any adverse changes in economic conditions in China, in the policies of the PRC government or in the
laws and regulations in China could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China. Such developments could adversely
affect our business and operating results, lead to reduction in demand for our solutions and services and adversely affect our competitive
position. The PRC government has implemented various measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of resources. Some
of these measures may benefit the overall PRC economy, but may have a negative effect on us. For example, our financial condition and
results of operations may be adversely affected by government control over capital investments or changes in tax regulations. In addition,
in the past, the PRC government has implemented certain measures, including interest rate adjustment, to control the pace of economic
growth. These measures may cause decreased economic activity in China, which may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
In addition, the increased global focus on social, ethical and environmental issues may lead to China’s adoption of more stringent
standards in these areas, which may adversely impact the operations of China-based companies including us.
In
addition, political tensions between the United States and China have escalated due to, among other things, trade disputes, the COVID-19
outbreak, sanctions imposed by the U.S. Department of Treasury on certain officials of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and
the central government of the PRC and the executive orders issued by the then U.S. President in August 2020 that prohibit certain transactions
with certain Chinese companies and their applications. Rising political tensions could reduce levels of trades, investments, technological
exchanges and other economic activities between the two major economies, which would have a material adverse effect on global economic
conditions and the stability of global financial markets. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business,
prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, there have been recent media reports on deliberations within the
U.S. government regarding potentially limiting or restricting China-based companies from accessing U.S. capital markets. If any such
deliberations were to materialize, the resulting legislation may have material and adverse impact on the stock performance of China-based
issuers listed in the United States.
Risks Relating to Doing Business in China
The approval, filing or other requirements
of the China Securities Regulatory Commission or other PRC government authorities may be required under PRC law in connection with our
issuance of securities overseas or to maintain the trading status of our ADSs, and if required, we cannot predict whether or for how
long we will be able to obtain such approval or complete such filing or other requirements.
The Regulations on Mergers
and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, purport to require offshore special purpose vehicles
that are controlled by PRC companies or individuals and that have been formed for the purpose of seeking a public listing on an overseas
stock exchange through acquisitions of PRC domestic companies or assets to obtain CSRC approval prior to publicly listing their securities
on an overseas stock exchange. The interpretation and application of the regulations remain unclear. If CSRC approval under the M&A
Rules is required, it is uncertain whether it would be possible for us to obtain the approval, and any failure to obtain or delay in
obtaining CSRC approval for our future issuance of securities overseas would subject us to sanctions imposed by the CSRC and other PRC
regulatory agencies.
Furthermore, on July 6, 2021,
relevant PRC government authorities promulgated the Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down on Illegal Securities Activities, which emphasized
the need to strengthen the administration over “illegal securities activities” and the supervision on overseas listings by
China-based companies, and proposed to take effective measures, such as promoting the construction of relevant regulatory systems to
deal with the risks and incidents faced by China-based overseas-listed companies, although such opinions did not specify the definition
of “illegal securities activities.” Such opinions further provided that the special provisions of the State Council on overseas
offerings and listings by those companies limited by shares will be revised and therefore the duties of domestic industry competent authorities
and regulatory agencies will be clarified.
On February 17, 2023, the CSRC released the Trial
Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies, or the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, and
five supporting guidelines, which came into effect on March 31, 2023. Pursuant to the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, domestic
companies that seek to offer or list securities overseas, both directly and indirectly, should fulfill the filing procedure and report
relevant information to the CSRC. In addition, domestic companies that have been listed on a foreign stock exchange prior to the effective
date of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures are required to file with the CSRC within three working days after such domestic company
completes a security offering on the foreign stock exchange on which its securities have been listed. Since the Overseas Listing Trial
Measures was newly promulgated, its interpretation, application and enforcement remain unclear. If the filing procedure with the CSRC
under the Overseas Listing Trial Measures is required for any future offerings, listing or any other capital raising activities by us,
it is uncertain whether we could complete the filing procedure in a timely manner, or at all.
Moreover, on January 4, 2022, the CAC published
the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures, which became effective on February 15, 2022. The Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures provide
that a critical information infrastructure operator purchasing network products and services, and platform operators carrying out data
processing activities, which affect or may affect national security, shall apply for cybersecurity review and that a platform operator
with more than one million users’ personal information aiming to list abroad must apply for cybersecurity review. There are substantial
uncertainties as to the interpretation, application, and enforcement of the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures and whether to conduct
a security offering or maintain our trading status of our ADSs will be subject to the cybersecurity review procedures.
In addition, we cannot guarantee that new rules
or regulations promulgated in the future will not impose any additional requirement on us or otherwise tightening the regulations on
companies with a VIE structure. If the CSRC or other relevant PRC regulatory agencies subsequently determine that prior approval or any
filing is required for any of our future offerings of securities overseas or to maintain the trading status of our ADSs, we cannot guarantee
that we will be able to obtain such approval or filing in a timely manner, or at all. The CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies also
may take actions requiring us, or making it advisable for us, not to proceed with such offering or maintain the trading status of our
ADSs. If we proceed with any of such offering or maintain the trading status of our ADSs without obtaining the CSRC’s or other
PRC regulatory agencies’ approval or filing to the extent it is required, or if we are unable to comply with any new approval or
filing requirements which might be adopted for offerings that we have completed prior to the publication of the above- referenced opinions,
we may face regulatory actions or other sanctions from the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies. These regulatory agencies may impose
fines and penalties on our operations in China, limit our ability to pay dividends outside of China, limit our operating privileges in
China, delay or restrict the repatriation of the proceeds from offering of securities overseas into China or take other actions that
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, as well as the trading
price of the ADSs.
Furthermore, if there are any other approvals, filings and/or other
administration procedures to be obtained from or completed with the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies as required by any new laws
and regulations for any of our future proposed offering of securities overseas or the trading of the ADSs, we cannot assure you that
we can obtain the required approval or complete the required filings or other regulatory procedures in a timely manner, or at all. Any
failure to obtain the relevant approvals or complete the filings and other relevant regulatory procedures may subject us to regulatory
actions or other sanctions from the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies, which may have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition or results of operations.
Uncertainties in the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws
and regulations could limit the legal protections available to you and us.
The
PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system, prior court decisions may be cited for
reference but have limited precedential value. The PRC legal system is evolving rapidly, and the interpretations of many laws, regulations
and rules may contain inconsistencies and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involves uncertainties.
Our
PRC subsidiary is a foreign-invested enterprises and are subject to laws and regulations applicable to foreign-invested enterprises as
well as various Chinese laws and regulations generally applicable to companies incorporated in China. However, since these laws and regulations
are relatively new and the PRC legal system continues to rapidly evolve, the interpretations of many laws, regulations and rules are
not always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involves uncertainties.
From
time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce our legal rights. However, since PRC administrative
and court authorities have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be more difficult
to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of protection we enjoy than in more developed legal systems.
Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules, some of which are not published on a timely
basis or at all, and which may have a retroactive effect. As a result, we may not be aware of our violation of any of these policies
and rules until sometime after the violation. In addition, any administrative and court proceedings in China may be protracted, resulting
in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention. Such uncertainties, including uncertainty over the scope and
effect of our contractual, property (including intellectual property) and procedural rights, and any failure to respond to changes in
the regulatory environment in China could materially and adversely affect our business and impede our ability to continue our operations.
The PRC government may intervene or influence
our operations at any time, or may exert more control over our future overseas offerings or foreign investments in us, which could result
in a material change in our operation and the value of our ADSs.
We conduct our business primarily through our
PRC subsidiary and VIE in China. Our operations in China are governed by PRC laws and regulations. The PRC government has significant
oversight and discretion over the operation of our business, and it may intervene or influence our operations at any time, which could
result in a material adverse change in our operation and the value of our ADSs.
The PRC government has recently indicated an
intent to exert more oversight over overseas offerings by and/or foreign investments in China-based issuers like us. For example, on
July 6, 2021, relevant PRC government authorities promulgated the Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down on Illegal Securities
Activities, which emphasized the need to strengthen the administration over “illegal securities activities” and the
supervision on overseas listings by China-based companies, and proposed to take effective measures, such as promoting the
construction of relevant regulatory systems to deal with the risks and incidents faced by China-based overseas-listed companies,
although such opinions did not specify the definition of “illegal securities activities.” Such opinions further provided
that the special provisions of the State Council on overseas offerings and listings by those companies limited by shares will be
revised and therefore the duties of domestic industry competent authorities and regulatory agencies will be clarified. On February
17, 2023, the CSRC released the Overseas Listing Trial Measures and five supporting guidelines, which came into effect on March 31,
2023. Pursuant to the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, domestic companies that seek to offer or list securities overseas, both
directly and indirectly, should fulfill the filing procedure and report relevant information to the CSRC. In addition, domestic
companies that have been listed on a foreign stock exchange prior to the effective date of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures are
required to file with the CSRC within three working days after such domestic company completes a security offering on the foreign
stock exchange on which its securities have been listed. Since the Overseas Listing Trial Measures was newly promulgated, its
interpretation, application and enforcement remain unclear. If the filing procedure with the CSRC under the Overseas Listing Trial
Measures is required for any future offerings, listing or any other capital raising activities by us, it is uncertain whether we
could complete the filing procedure in a timely manner, or at all.
In addition, on January 4, 2022, the CAC published
the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures, which became effective on February 15, 2022. The Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures provide
that a critical information infrastructure operator purchasing network products and services, and platform operators carrying out data
processing activities, which affect or may affect national security, shall apply for cybersecurity review and that a platform operator
with more than one million users’ personal information aiming to list abroad must apply for cybersecurity review. There are substantial
uncertainties as to the interpretation, application, and enforcement of the Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures and whether to conduct
a security offering or maintain our trading status in the U.S. will be subject to the cybersecurity review procedures.
It remains uncertain how PRC government authorities
will regulate overseas listing and trading in general and whether we are required to complete filing or obtain any specific regulatory
approvals from the CSRC, CAC or any other PRC government authorities for our overseas offerings. If the CSRC, CAC or other government
authorities later promulgate new rules or explanations requiring that we obtain their approvals for our future overseas offerings or
maintain the trading status of our ADS, we may be unable to obtain such approvals in a timely manner, or at all, and such approvals may
be rescinded even if obtained. Any such circumstance could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to continue to offer
securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. In addition, implementation
of industry-wide regulations affecting our operations could cause the value of our securities to significantly decline. Therefore, investors
of our company and our business face potential uncertainty from actions taken by the PRC government affecting our business.
You may experience difficulties in effecting
service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing actions in China against us or our management named in the annual report
based on foreign laws.
We are an exempted company with limited
liability incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands; however, we conduct substantially all of our operations in China and
most of our assets are located outside of the United States. In addition, all of our directors and executive officers are nationals
or residents of jurisdictions other than the United States and most of their assets are located outside the United States. See
“Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees – 6.A Directors and Senior Management” for the names of our
directors and executive officers. As a result, it may be difficult for you to effect service of process upon us or our management
named in the annual report inside mainland China. It may also be difficult for you to enforce in U.S. courts of the judgments
obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us and our officers and
directors. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Cayman Islands or the PRC would recognize or enforce
judgments of U.S. courts against us or such persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the
United States or any state.
The
recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are provided for under the PRC Civil Procedures Law. PRC courts may recognize and enforce
foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between China and the
country where the judgment is made or on principles of reciprocity between jurisdictions. China does not have any treaties or other forms
of written arrangement with the United States that provide for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. In addition,
according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law, the PRC courts will not enforce a foreign judgment against us or our directors and officers
if they decide that the judgment violates the basic principles of PRC laws or national sovereignty, security or public interest. As a
result, it is uncertain whether and on what basis a PRC court would enforce a judgment rendered by a court in the United States.
The PCAOB had historically been
unable to inspect our former auditor in relation to their audit work performed for our financial statements for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2020, which is included elsewhere in this annual report. Recent developments with respect to audits of China-based companies
may still create uncertainty about the ability of our current auditor to fully cooperate with the PCAOB’s inspection requests without
the approval of the relevant PRC authorities.
Our
former auditor, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP (“Deloitte”), is an independent public accounting
firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), or the PCAOB. Deloitte issued the audit report for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, which is included elsewhere in this annual report. Our former auditor is subject to laws in
the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional
standards. Since our former auditor is located in China, a jurisdiction where the PCAOB was historically unable to conduct inspections
without the approval of the relevant PRC authorities before 2022, our former auditor had not been inspected by the PCAOB.
The
lack of the PCAOB inspections in China in the past prevented the PCAOB from fully evaluating audits and quality control procedures of
our former auditor, depriving us and investors in our ADSs of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections. The past inability of the PCAOB
to conduct inspections of auditors in China made it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of such auditor’s audit procedures
or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of China that were subject to the PCAOB inspections.
On November 19, 2021, we engaged Marcum Asia
CPAs LLP (“Marcum Asia”, formerly known as Marcum Bernstein & Pinchuk LLP) as our independent registered public accounting
firm to replace Deloitte to audit our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. For more details,
see “Item 16.F. Change in Registration’s Certifying Accountant.” Marcum Asia is an independent registered public accounting
firm that is headquartered in Manhattan, New York. As an auditor of companies traded publicly in the United States, it issues the audit
report as of and for the years ended December 31, 2021, which is included elsewhere in this annual report. Our auditor is subject to
laws in the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional
standards. Marcum Asia is subject to inspection by the PCAOB on a regular basis with the last inspection in 2020. Our ability to retain
an auditor subject to PCAOB inspection and investigation, including but not limited to inspection of the audit working papers related
to us, may depend on the relevant positions of U.S. and Chinese regulators. Marcum Asia’s audit working papers related to us are
located in China. With respect to audits of companies with operations in China, such as the Company, there are uncertainties about the
ability of our auditor to fully cooperate with a request by the PCAOB for audit working papers in China without the approval of Chinese
authorities.
Trading in our securities on U.S. markets, including the OTC
market, may be prohibited under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA if the PCAOB determines that it is unable
to inspect or investigate completely our auditor for two consecutive years.
On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued the HFCAA
Determination Report to notify the SEC of its determinations that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered
public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong (the “2021 Determinations”). As of the date of this
annual report, our auditor is not included in the report. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it was able to secure complete
access to inspect and investigate PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong completely in
2022. The PCAOB vacated its previous 2021 Determinations accordingly. As a result, we do not expect to be identified as a Commission-Identified
Issuer under the HFCAA for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 after we file our annual report on Form 20-F for such fiscal year.
The PCAOB is expected to continue to demand complete access to inspections and investigations against accounting firms headquartered
in mainland China and Hong Kong in the future and states that it has already made plans to resume regular inspections in early 2023 and
beyond.Each year, the PCAOB will determine whether it can inspect and investigate completely accounting firms headquartered in mainland
China and Hong Kong.Furthermore, on June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed a bill known as the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies
Accountable Act, to amend Section 104(i) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to prohibit securities of any registrant from being listed
on any of the U.S. securities exchanges or traded over-the-counter if the auditor of the registrant is not subject to PCAOB inspection
for two consecutive years. On December 29, 2022, the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act was signed into law as part
of the fiscal year 2023 omnibus spending legislation. It requires the SEC to prohibit an issuer’s securities from trading on U.S.
markets if the SEC identifies such issuer to be a Commission-Identified Issuer for two consecutive years. Should the PCAOB again encounter
impediments to inspections and investigations in mainland China or Hong Kong as a result of positions taken by any authority in either
jurisdiction, the PCAOB will make determinations under the HFCAA as and when appropriate. This would substantially impair your ability
to sell or purchase our ADSs when you wish to do so, and the risk and uncertainty associated with trading prohibition would have a negative
impact on the price of our ADSs. Also, such a trading prohibition would significantly affect our ability to raise capital on terms acceptable
to us, or at all, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects.
The custodians or authorized users of our controlling non-tangible
assets, including chops and seals, may fail to fulfill their responsibilities, or misappropriate or misuse these assets.
Under the PRC law, legal documents for corporate
transactions, including agreements and contracts are executed using the chop or seal of the signing entity or with the signature of a
legal representative whose designation is registered and filed with relevant PRC market regulation administrative authorities.
In order to secure the use of our chops and seals,
we have established internal control procedures and rules for using these chops and seals. In any event that the chops and seals are
intended to be used, the responsible personnel will submit the application through our office automation system and the application will
be verified and approved by authorized employees in accordance with our internal control procedures and rules. In addition, in order
to maintain the physical security of our chops, we generally have them stored in secured locations accessible only to authorized employees.
Although we monitor such authorized employees, the procedures may not be sufficient to prevent all instances of abuse or negligence.
There is a risk that our employees could abuse their authority, for example, by entering into a contract not approved by us or seeking
to gain control of one of our subsidiaries or the VIE. If any employee obtains, misuses or misappropriates our chops and seals or other
controlling non-tangible assets for whatever reason, we could experience disruption to our normal business operations. We may have to
take corporate or legal action, which could involve significant time and resources to resolve and divert management from our operations.
If we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income
tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders or ADS holders.
Under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its
implementation rules, an enterprise established outside of the PRC with a “de facto management body” within China is considered
a “resident enterprise” and will be subject to the enterprise income tax on its global income at the rate of 25%. The implementation
rules define the term “de facto management body” as the body that exercises full and substantial control and overall management
over the business, productions, personnel, accounts and properties of an enterprise. In 2009, the State Administration of Taxation, or
the SAT, issued the Circular of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Relating to Identification of PRC-Controlled Overseas
Registered Enterprises as Resident Enterprises in Accordance with the De Facto Standards of Organizational Management, or SAT Circular
82, which provides certain specific criteria for determining whether the “de facto management body” of a PRC-controlled enterprise
that is incorporated offshore is located in China. Although this circular only applies to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises
or PRC enterprise groups, not those controlled by PRC individuals or foreigners, the criteria set forth in the circular may reflect SAT’s
general position on how the “de facto management body” text should be applied in determining the tax resident status of all
offshore enterprises. According to SAT Circular 82, an offshore incorporated enterprise controlled by a PRC enterprise or a PRC enterprise
group will be regarded as a PRC tax resident by virtue of having its “de facto management body” in China and will be subject
to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income only if all of the following conditions are met: (i) the primary location of the day-to-day
operational management is in China; (ii) decisions relating to the enterprise’s financial and human resource matters are made or
are subject to approval by organizations or personnel in China; (iii) the enterprise’s primary assets, accounting books and records,
company seals, and board and shareholder resolutions, are located or maintained in China; and (iv) at least 50% of voting board members
or senior executives habitually reside in China.
We believe none of our entities outside of China
is a PRC resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes. However, the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to determination by the
PRC tax authorities and uncertainties remain with respect to the interpretation of the term “de facto management body.” If
the PRC tax authorities determine that our company or any of our subsidiaries outside of China is a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise
income tax purposes, we could be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 25% on our worldwide income, which could materially reduce our net income,
and we may be required to withhold a 10% withholding tax from dividends we pay to our shareholders that are non-resident enterprises,
including the holders of our ADSs. In addition, non-resident enterprise shareholders (including the ADS holders) may be subject to PRC
tax at a rate of 10% on gains realized on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or Class A ordinary shares, if such income is treated
as sourced from within China. Furthermore, if we are deemed a PRC resident enterprise, dividends payable to our non-PRC individual shareholders
(including the ADS holders) and any gain realized on the transfer of ADSs or Class A ordinary shares by such shareholders may be subject
to PRC tax at a rate of 10% in the case of non-PRC enterprises or a rate of 20% in the case of non-PRC individuals unless a reduced rate
is available under an applicable tax treaty. It is unclear whether non-PRC shareholders of our company would be able to claim the benefits
of any tax treaties between their country of tax residence and the PRC in the event that we are treated as a PRC resident enterprise.
Any such tax may reduce the returns on your investment in the ADSs or Class A ordinary shares.
We face uncertainties with respect to indirect transfer of equity
interests in PRC resident enterprises by their non-PRC holding companies.
We face uncertainties regarding the reporting
on and consequences of previous private equity financing transactions involving the transfer and exchange of shares in our company by
non-resident investors. In February 2015, the State Administration of Taxation, or SAT, issued the Bulletin on Issues of Enterprise Income
Tax on Indirect Transfers of Assets by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises, or SAT Bulletin 7. Pursuant to SAT Bulletin 7, an “indirect
transfer” of PRC assets, including a transfer of equity interests in an unlisted non-PRC holding company of a PRC resident enterprise,
by non-PRC resident enterprises may be re-characterized and treated as a direct transfer of the underlying PRC assets, if such arrangement
does not have a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of avoiding payment of PRC enterprise income tax. As
a result, gains derived from such indirect transfer may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax, and the transferee or other person who
is obligated to pay for the transfer is obligated to withhold the applicable taxes, currently at a rate of 10% for the transfer of equity
interests in a PRC resident enterprise. On October 17, 2017, the SAT issued the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation
on Issues Concerning the Withholding of Non-resident Enterprise Income Tax at Source, or SAT Bulletin 37, which came into effect on December
1, 2017. The SAT Bulletin 37 further clarifies the practice and procedure of the withholding of nonresident enterprise income tax. We
also face uncertainties on the reporting and consequences of future private equity financing transactions, share exchanges or other transactions
involving the transfer of shares in our company by investors that are non-PRC resident enterprises.
The PRC tax authorities may pursue non-resident
enterprises involved in our previous or future private equity financing transactions with respect to a filing or the transferees with
respect to withholding obligation, and request our PRC subsidiary to assist in the filing. As a result, we and non-resident enterprises
in such transactions may become at risk of being subject to filing obligations or being taxed under SAT Bulletin 7 and SAT Bulletin 37,
and may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with them or to establish that we and our non-resident enterprises should
not be taxed under these regulations, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
If the calculation of our tax liability is successfully challenged
by the PRC tax authorities, we may be required to pay tax, interest and penalties in excess of our tax provisions.
In the ordinary course of our business, we are
subject to complex income tax and other tax regulations, and significant judgment is required in the determination of a provision for
income taxes. Although we believe our tax provisions are reasonable, if the PRC tax authorities successfully challenge our position and
we are required to pay tax, interest and penalties in excess of our tax provisions, our financial condition and results of operations
would be materially and adversely affected.
The M&A Rules and certain other PRC regulations establish
complex procedures for some acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign investors, which could make it more difficult for us to pursue
growth through acquisitions in China.
The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of
Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in 2006 and amended in 2009, and
some other regulations and rules concerning mergers and acquisitions established complex procedures and requirements for some acquisitions
of Chinese companies by foreign investors, including requirements in some instances that the MOFCOM be notified in advance of any change-of-control
transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise. Moreover, the Anti-Monopoly Law promulgated by the
Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress which became effective in 2008 and was last amended on June 24, 2022 requires
that transactions which are deemed concentrations and involve parties with specified turnover thresholds must be cleared by relevant
governmental authorities before they can be completed. In February 7, 2021, the Anti-monopoly Commission of the State Council, published
the Anti-Monopoly Guidelines for the Internet Platform Economy Sector that aims at specifying some of the circumstances under which an
activity of internet platforms may be identified as monopolistic act as well as classifying that concentrations involving variable interest
entities shall also be subject to anti-monopoly review. In addition, the security review rules issued by the MOFCOM that became effective
in September 2011 specify that mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors that raise “national defense and security” concerns
and mergers and acquisitions through which foreign investors may acquire de facto control over domestic enterprises that raise “national
security” concerns are subject to strict review by the MOFCOM, and the rules prohibit any activities attempting to bypass a security
review, including by structuring a transaction through a proxy or contractual control arrangement.
In the future, we may pursue potential strategic
acquisitions that are complementary to our business and operations. Complying with the requirements of the above-mentioned regulations
and other relevant rules to complete such transactions could be time-consuming, and any required approval processes, including obtaining
approval or clearance from MOFCOM, may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could affect our ability to
expand our business or maintain our market share.
Failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the registration
requirements for employee stock ownership plans or share option plans may subject the PRC plan participants or us to fines and other
legal or administrative sanctions.
In February 2012, the State Administration of
Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, promulgated the Notices on Issues Concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals
Participating in Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly Listed Company, replacing earlier rules promulgated in 2007. Pursuant to these
rules, PRC citizens and non-PRC citizens who reside in China for a continuous period of not less than one year and participate in any
stock incentive plan of an overseas publicly listed company are required to register with SAFE through a domestic qualified agent, which
could be the PRC subsidiaries of such overseas-listed company, and complete certain other procedures, unless certain exceptions are available.
In addition, an overseas-entrusted institution must be retained to handle matters in connection with the exercise or sale of stock options
and the purchase or sale of shares and interests. We and our executive officers and other employees who are PRC citizens or non-PRC citizens
living in China for a continuous period of not less than one year and have been granted options are subject to these regulations as our
company has become an overseas-listed company. Failure to complete SAFE registrations may subject them to fines of up to RMB300,000 for
entities and up to RMB50,000 for individuals and may also limit our ability to contribute additional capital into our PRC subsidiary
and our PRC subsidiary’s ability to distribute dividends to us. We also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability
to adopt additional incentive plans for our directors, executive officers and employees under PRC law. See “Item 4. Information
on the Company-4.B. Business Overview-Regulation-Regulation Relating to Foreign Exchange-Regulation on Stock Incentive Plans.”
In addition, the State Administration of Taxation
(“SAT”) has issued certain circulars concerning employee share options and restricted shares. Under these circulars, our
employees working in China who exercise share options or are granted restricted shares will be subject to PRC individual income tax.
Our PRC subsidiary have obligations to file documents related to employee share options or restricted shares with relevant tax authorities
and to withhold individual income taxes for those employees who exercise their share options. If our employees fail to pay or we fail
to withhold their income taxes according to relevant laws and regulations, we may face sanctions imposed by the tax authorities or other
PRC government authorities. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—4.B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulation
Relating to Foreign Exchange—Regulation on Stock Incentive Plans.”
PRC regulations relating to offshore investment activities by
PRC residents may limit our PRC subsidiary’s ability to change their registered capital or distribute profits to us or otherwise
expose us or our PRC resident beneficial owners to liability and penalties under PRC laws.
In July 2014, SAFE promulgated the Circular on
Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Control on Domestic Residents’ Offshore Investment and Financing and Roundtrip Investment
Through Special Purpose Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 37. SAFE Circular 37 requires PRC residents (including PRC individuals and PRC corporate
entities as well as foreign individuals that are deemed as PRC residents for foreign exchange administration purposes) to register with
SAFE or its local branches in connection with their direct or indirect offshore investment activities. SAFE Circular 37 further requires
amendment to the SAFE registrations in the event of any changes with respect to the basic information of the offshore special purpose
vehicle, such as change of a PRC individual shareholder, name and operation term, or any significant changes with respect to the offshore
special purpose vehicle, such as increase or decrease of capital contribution, share transfer or exchange, or mergers or divisions. SAFE
Circular 37 is applicable to our shareholders who are PRC residents and may be applicable to any offshore acquisitions that we make in
the future. According to the Notice on Further Simplifying and Improving Policies for the Foreign Exchange Administration of Direct Investment
released on February 13, 2015 by the SAFE, local banks will examine and handle foreign exchange registration for overseas direct investment,
including the initial foreign exchange registration and amendment registration, under SAFE Circular 37 from June 1, 2015. The PRC residents
shall, by themselves or entrusting accounting firms or banks, file with the online information system designated by SAFE with respect
to its existing rights under offshore direct investment each year prior to the requisite time.
If our shareholders who are PRC residents or
entities do not complete their registration with the local SAFE branches or qualified local banks or complete annual filing of its existing
rights under offshore direct investment, our PRC subsidiary may be prohibited from distributing to us its profits and proceeds from any
reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation, and we may be restricted in our ability to contribute additional capital to our
PRC subsidiary. Moreover, failure to comply with the SAFE registration described above could result in liability under PRC laws for evasion
of applicable foreign exchange restrictions.
We have used our best efforts to notify PRC residents
or entities who directly or indirectly hold shares in our Cayman Islands holding company and who are known to us as being PRC residents
or entities to complete the foreign exchange registrations and annual filings of its existing rights under offshore direct investment.
However, we may not be informed of the identities of all the PRC residents or entities holding direct or indirect interest in our company,
nor can we compel our beneficial owners to comply with SAFE registration requirements. We cannot assure you that all shareholders or
beneficial owners of ours who are PRC residents or entities have complied with, and will in the future make, obtain or update any applicable
registrations or approvals required by, SAFE regulations.
The failure or inability of such shareholders
or beneficial owners to comply with SAFE regulations, or failure by us to amend the foreign exchange registrations of our PRC subsidiary,
could subject us to fines or legal sanctions, restrict our overseas or cross-border investment activities, limit our PRC subsidiary’s
ability to make distributions or pay dividends to us or affect our ownership structure. As a result, our business operations and our
ability to distribute profits to you could be materially and adversely affected.
We may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid
by our PRC subsidiary to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have, and any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiary
to make payments to us could have a material and adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.
We are a Cayman Islands holding company and we
rely principally on dividends and other distributions on equity from our PRC subsidiary for our cash requirements, including the funds
necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders for services or any debt we may incur. If our PRC subsidiary
incur debt on its own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict its ability to pay dividends or make other
distributions to us. Under PRC laws and regulations, our PRC subsidiary, which is a foreign-owned enterprise, may pay dividends only
out of its respective accumulated profits as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, a foreign-owned
enterprise is required to set aside at least 10% of its accumulated after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund a certain statutory
reserve fund, until the aggregate amount of such fund reaches 50% of its registered capital. Such reserve funds cannot be distributed
to us as dividends. At its discretion, a foreign-owned enterprise may allocate a portion of its after-tax profits based on PRC accounting
standards to an enterprise expansion fund.
Our PRC subsidiary generate essentially all of
their revenue in Renminbi, which is not freely convertible into other currencies. As a result, any restriction on currency exchange may
limit the ability of our PRC subsidiary to use their Renminbi revenues to pay dividends to us.
The PRC government may continue to strengthen
its capital controls, and more restrictions and substantial vetting processes may be put forward by SAFE for cross-border transactions
falling under both the current account and the capital account. Any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiary to pay dividends
or make other kinds of payments to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that
could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct our business.
In addition, the Enterprise Income Tax Law and
its implementation rules provide that a withholding tax rate of up to 10% will be applicable to dividends payable by Chinese companies
to non-PRC-resident enterprises unless exempted or reduced according to treaties or arrangements between the PRC central government and
governments of other countries or regions where the non-PRC-resident enterprises are incorporated.
PRC regulation of loans to and direct investment in PRC entities
by offshore holding companies and governmental control of currency conversion may delay or prevent us from using the proceeds of the
initial public offering to make loans or additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiary and the VIE in China, which could materially
and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business.
We are an offshore holding company conducting
our operations in China through our PRC subsidiary and VIE. We may make loans to our PRC subsidiary and VIE subject to the approval from
or registration with governmental authorities and limitation on amount, or we may make additional capital contributions to our wholly
foreign-owned subsidiary in China. Any loans to our wholly foreign-owned subsidiary in China, which are treated as foreign-invested enterprises,
or FIEs, under PRC law, are subject to applicable foreign exchange loan registrations. In addition, an FIE shall use its capital pursuant
to the principle of authenticity and self-use within its business scope. The capital of an FIE shall not be used for the following purposes:
(i) directly or indirectly used for payment beyond the business scope of such FIE or the payment prohibited by relevant laws and regulations;
(ii) directly or indirectly used for investment in securities or investments in financial management other than banks’ principal-secured
products unless otherwise provided by relevant laws and regulations; (iii) the granting of loans to non-affiliated enterprises, except
where it is expressly permitted in the business license; and (iv) paying the expenses related to the purchase of real estate that is
not for self-use (except for the foreign-invested real estate enterprises).
SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration
of Foreign Exchange on Reforming the Administration of Foreign Exchange Settlement of Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprises, or SAFE
Circular 19, effective June 2015, in replacement of a former regulation. According to SAFE Circular 19, the flow and use of the RMB capital
converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital of a foreign-invested company is regulated such that RMB capital may not
be used for the issuance of RMB entrusted loans, the repayment of inter-enterprise loans or the repayment of bank loans that have been
transferred to a third party. Although SAFE Circular 19 allows RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital
of a foreign- invested enterprise to be used for equity investments within China, it also reiterates the principle that RMB converted
from the foreign currency-denominated capital of a foreign-invested company may not be directly or indirectly used for purposes beyond
its business scope. Thus, it is unclear whether SAFE will permit such capital to be used for equity investments in China in actual practice.
SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming and Standardizing the Foreign Exchange Settlement
Management Policy of Capital Account, or SAFE Circular 16, effective on June 9, 2016, which reiterates some of the rules set forth in
SAFE Circular 19, but changes the prohibition against using RMB capital converted from foreign currency-denominated registered capital
of a foreign-invested company to issue RMB entrusted loans to a prohibition against using such capital to issue loans to non-associated
enterprises. Violations of SAFE Circular 19 and SAFE Circular 16 could result in administrative penalties. SAFE Circular 19 and SAFE
Circular 16 may significantly limit our ability to transfer any foreign currency we hold, including the net proceeds from the initial
public offering, to our PRC subsidiary, which may adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our business in China.
On October 23, 2019, the SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Promoting the Convenience
of Cross-border Trade and Investment, or the SAFE Circular 28, which, among other things, allows all foreign-invested companies to use
Renminbi converted from foreign currency-denominated capital for equity investments in China, as long as the equity investment is genuine,
does not violate applicable laws, and complies with the negative list on foreign investment. However, since the SAFE Circular 28 is newly
promulgated, it is unclear how SAFE and competent banks will carry this out in practice.
In light of the various requirements imposed
by PRC regulations on loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies, we cannot assure you that we will
be able to complete the necessary government registrations or obtain the necessary government approvals on a timely basis, or at all,
with respect to future loans by us to our PRC subsidiary or VIE or with respect to future capital contributions by us to our PRC subsidiary.
If we fail to complete such registrations or obtain such approvals, our ability to use the proceeds from our initial public offering
and to capitalize or otherwise fund our PRC operations may be negatively affected, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity
and our ability to fund and expand our business.
Governmental control of currency conversion may limit our ability
to utilize our revenues effectively and affect the value of your investment.
The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility
of the Renminbi into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of China. We receive all of our revenues
in Renminbi. Under our current corporate structure, our Cayman Islands holding company may rely on dividend payments from our PRC subsidiary
to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account
items, including profit distributions, interest payments and trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions, can be made in
foreign currencies without prior approval of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE, by complying with certain procedural
requirements. Specifically, under the existing exchange restrictions, without prior approval of SAFE, cash generated from the operations
of our PRC subsidiary in China may be used to pay dividends to our company. However, approval from or registration with appropriate government
authorities is required where Renminbi is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of China to pay capital expenses such
as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. As a result, we need to obtain SAFE approval to use cash generated from
the operations of our PRC subsidiary and consolidated variable interest entities to pay off their respective debt in a currency other
than Renminbi owed to entities outside China, or to make other capital expenditure payments outside China in a currency other than Renminbi.
In light of the flood of capital outflows of
China in 2016 due to the weakening Renminbi, the PRC government has imposed more restrictive foreign exchange policies and stepped up
scrutiny of major outbound capital movement including overseas direct investment. More restrictions and substantial vetting processes
are put in place by SAFE to regulate cross-border transactions falling under the capital account. If any of our shareholders regulated
by such policies fails to satisfy the applicable overseas direct investment filing or approval requirement timely or at all, it may be
subject to penalties from the relevant PRC authorities. The PRC government may at its discretion further restrict access in the future
to foreign currencies for current account transactions. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient
foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders,
including holders of the ADSs.
It may be difficult for overseas regulators to conduct investigations
or collect evidence within China.
Shareholder claims or regulatory investigations
that are common in jurisdictions outside China are difficult to pursue as a matter of law or practicality in China. For example, in China,
there are significant legal and other obstacles to providing information needed for regulatory investigations or litigation initiated
outside China. Although the authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities
of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, such cooperation with the securities regulatory
authorities in the United States or other jurisdictions may not be efficient in the absence of a mutual and practical cooperation mechanism.
Furthermore, according to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, or Article 177, which became effective in March 2020, no overseas securities
regulator is allowed to directly conduct investigation or evidence collection activities within the territory of the PRC, and without
the consent by the Chinese securities regulatory authorities and the other competent governmental agencies, no entity or individual may
provide documents or materials related to securities business to any foreign party. In addition, the Overseas Listing Trial Measures
provides, among others, that domestic companies or individuals shall obtain consents from the CSRC and relevant competent authorities
before such domestic companies provide relevant documents and materials required by overseas securities regulators for investigation
and collection of evidence. While detailed interpretation of or implementation rules under Article 177 and the above-mentioned provision
of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures have yet to be promulgated, the inability of an overseas securities regulator to directly conduct
investigation or evidence collection activities within China and the required prior consent from the CSRC may further increase difficulties
you face in protecting your interests. See also “—Risks Relating to Our Class A Ordinary Shares and Our ADSs—You may
face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we
are incorporated under Cayman Islands law” for risks associated with investing in us as a Cayman Islands company.
Additional remedial measures could be imposed on certain PRC-based
accounting firms, including our former independent registered public accounting firm, in administrative proceedings instituted by the
SEC, as a result of which certain of financial statements may be determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange
Act, if at all.
In December 2012, the SEC brought administrative
proceedings against the PRC-based “big four” accounting firms, including our former independent registered public accounting
firm, alleging that they had violated U.S. securities laws by failing to provide audit work papers and other documents related to certain
other PRC-based companies under investigation by the SEC. On January 22, 2014, an initial administrative law decision was issued, censuring
and suspending these accounting firms from practicing before the SEC for a period of six months. The decision was neither final nor legally
effective until reviewed and approved by the SEC, and on February 12, 2014, the PRC-based accounting firms appealed to the SEC against
this decision. In February 2015, each of the four PRC-based accounting firms agreed to a censure and to pay a fine to the SEC to settle
the dispute and avoid suspension of their ability to practice before the SEC. The settlement required the firms to follow detailed procedures
to seek to provide the SEC with access to such firms’ audit documents via the CSRC. If the firms did not follow these procedures
or if there is a failure in the process between the SEC and the CSRC, the SEC could impose penalties such as suspensions, or it could
restart the administrative proceedings. Under the terms of the settlement, the underlying proceeding against the four PRC-based accounting
firms was deemed dismissed with prejudice four years after entry of the settlement. The four-year mark occurred on February 6, 2019.
While we cannot predict if the SEC will further challenge the four PRC-based accounting firms’ compliance with U.S. law in connection
with U.S. regulatory requests for audit work papers or if the results of such challenge would result in the SEC imposing penalties such
as suspensions.
In the event that the PRC-based “big four”
accounting firms become subject to additional legal challenges by the SEC or the PCAOB, depending upon the final outcome, listed companies
in the U.S. with major PRC operations may find it difficult or impossible to retain auditors in respect of their operations in the PRC,
which could result in our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2020 being determined to not be in compliance with the
requirements of the Exchange Act. Moreover, any negative news about any such future proceedings against
these audit firms may cause investor uncertainty regarding China-based, U.S.-listed companies and the trading price of the ADSs may be
adversely affected.
Litigation and negative publicity surrounding China-based companies
listed in the U.S. may result in increased regulatory scrutiny of us and negatively impact the trading price of our ADSs.
We believe that litigation and negative publicity
surrounding companies with operations in China that are listed in the U.S. have negatively impacted stock prices for such companies.
Various equity-based research organizations have published reports on China-based companies after examining, among other things, their
corporate governance practices, related party transactions, sales practices and financial statements that have led to special investigations
and stock suspensions on national exchanges. Any similar scrutiny of us, regardless of its lack of merit, could result in a diversion
of management resources and energy, potential costs to defend ourselves against rumors, decreases and volatility in the ADS trading price,
and increased directors and officers insurance premiums, and could have a material adverse effect upon our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
The ability of U.S. authorities to bring actions for violations
of U.S. securities law and regulations against us, our directors, executive officers or the expert named in this annual report may be
limited. Therefore, you may not be afforded the same protection as provided to investors in U.S. domestic companies.
The SEC, the U.S. Department of Justice, or the
DOJ, and other U.S. authorities often have substantial difficulties in bringing and enforcing actions against non-U.S. companies such
as us, and non-U.S. persons, such as our directors and executive officers in China. Due to jurisdictional limitations, matters of comity
and various other factors, the SEC, the DOJ and other U.S. authorities may be limited in their ability to pursue bad actors, including
in instances of fraud, in emerging markets such as China. We conduct our operations mainly in China and our assets are mainly located
in China and outside of the United States. In addition, a majority of our directors and executive officers reside within China. There
are significant legal and other obstacles for U.S. authorities to obtain information needed for investigations or litigation against
us or our directors, executive officers or other gatekeepers in case we or any of these individuals engage in fraud or other wrongdoing.
In addition, local authorities in China may be constrained in their ability to assist U.S. authorities and overseas investors in connection
with legal proceedings. As a result, if we, our directors, executive officers or other gatekeepers commit any securities law violation,
fraud or other financial misconduct, the U.S. authorities may not be able to conduct effective investigations or bring and enforce actions
against us, our directors, executive officers or other gatekeepers. Therefore, you may not be able to enjoy the same protection provided
by various U.S. authorities as it is provided to investors in U.S. domestic companies.
Risks Relating to Our Class
A Ordinary Shares and Our ADSs
The trading price of our ADSs has been volatile and may
continue to be volatile, regardless of our operating performance.
Our ADSs were listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(the “NYSE”), since our SEC-registered initial public offering in May 2021. We received a delisting notice from NYSE on June
2, 2022. On June 17, 2022, we were delisted from NYSE when the staff of the NYSE filed a Form 25 Notification of Delisting. Our ADSs
have been quoted on the OTC Pink Limited Information under the symbol “ZMENY” since the NYSE suspended the trading of our
ADSs on June 2, 2022.
The OTC Market is a significantly more limited
market than the NYSE. The quotation of our ADSs on the OTC Market may result in a less liquid market available for existing and potential
stockholders to trade our ADSs, could depress the trading price of our ADSs and could have a long-term adverse impact on our ability
to raise capital in the future.
Since our ADSs have been quoted
on the OTC market, the daily closing trading prices of our ADSs ranged from US$0.16 to US$0.649 per ADS up to the date of this
annual report. The trading price of the ADSs has been volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors beyond our control. This may
happen because of broad market and industry factors, including the performance and fluctuation of the market prices of other companies
with business operations located mainly in China that have listed their securities in the United States. In addition to market and industry
factors, the price and trading volume for the ADSs may be highly volatile for factors specific to our own operations, including the following:
| ● | actual or anticipated
variations in our revenues, earnings, cash flow and changes or revisions of our expected
results; |
| ● | fluctuations in
operating metrics; |
| ● | announcements
of new investments, acquisitions, strategic partnerships or joint ventures by us or our competitors; |
| ● | announcements
of new products, services and courses and expansions by us or our competitors; |
| ● | changes in financial
estimates by securities analysts; |
| ● | announcements of
studies and reports relating to the quality of our product, service and course offerings
or those of our competitors; |
| ● | changes in the
performance or market valuations of other online education companies; |
| ● | conditions in
the online education market; |
| ● | detrimental negative
publicity about us, our competitors or our industry; |
| ● | additions or departures
of key personnel; |
| ● | release of lockup
or other transfer restrictions on our outstanding equity securities or sales of additional
equity securities; |
| ● | regulatory developments
affecting us or our industry; |
| ● | general economic
or political conditions affecting China or elsewhere in the world; |
| ● | fluctuations of
exchange rates between the RMB and the U.S. dollar; and |
| ● | potential litigation
or regulatory investigations. |
Any of these factors may result in large and
sudden changes in the volume and price at which the ADSs will trade. Furthermore, the stock market in general experiences price and volume
fluctuations that are often unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies like us. These broad market and industry
fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our ADSs. Volatility or a lack of positive performance in the ADS price may also
adversely affect our ability to retain key employees, most of whom have been granted equity incentives.
In addition, the stock market in general, and
the trading prices for internet-related companies and companies with operations in China in particular, have experienced volatility that
often has been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. The securities of some China-based companies that have listed
their securities in the United States have experienced significant volatility since their initial public offerings in recent years, including,
in some cases, substantial declines in the trading prices of their securities. The trading performances of these companies’ securities
after their offerings may affect the attitudes of investors towards Chinese companies listed in the United States in general, which consequently
may impact the trading performance of the ADSs, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition, any negative news or perceptions
about inadequate corporate governance practices or fraudulent accounting, corporate structure or other matters of other Chinese companies
may also negatively affect the attitudes of investors towards Chinese companies in general, including us, regardless of whether we have
engaged in any inappropriate activities. In particular, the global financial crisis and the ensuing economic recessions in many countries
have contributed and may continue to contribute to extreme volatility in the global stock markets. These broad market and industry fluctuations
may adversely affect the trading price of the ADSs. Volatility or a lack of positive performance in the trading price of the ADSs may
also adversely affect our ability to retain key employees, most of whom have been granted options or other equity incentives.
In the past, shareholders of public companies
have often brought securities class action suits against companies following periods of instability in the trading price of their securities.
If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources
from our business and operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit, which could harm our results of operations.
Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future.
In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research
or reports about our business, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding the ADSs, the trading price for the ADSs and
trading volume could decline.
The trading market for the ADSs will be influenced
by research or reports that industry or securities analysts publish about our business. If one or more analysts who cover us downgrade
the ADSs, the trading price for the ADSs would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover us or fail to regularly
publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the trading price or trading volume
for the ADSs to decline.
Our dual-class voting structure will limit your ability to influence
corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares
and ADSs may view as beneficial.
Our authorized share capital is divided into
Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares (with certain shares remaining undesignated, with power for our directors to designate
and issue such classes of shares as they think fit). Holders of Class A ordinary shares are entitled to one vote per share, while holders
of Class B ordinary shares are entitled to thirty votes per share. Class A ordinary shares are represented by our ADSs. Each Class B
ordinary share is convertible into one Class A ordinary share at any time by the holder thereof, while Class A ordinary shares are not
convertible into Class B ordinary shares under any circumstances. The holder of Class B ordinary shares have the ability to control matters
requiring shareholders’ approval, including any amendment of our memorandum and articles of association. Any future issuances of
Class B ordinary shares may be dilutive to the voting power of holders of Class A ordinary shares. Any conversions of Class B ordinary
shares into Class A ordinary shares may dilute the percentage ownership of the existing holders of Class A ordinary shares within their
class of ordinary shares. Such conversions may increase the aggregate voting power of the existing holders of Class A ordinary shares.
In the event that we have multiple holders of Class B ordinary shares in the future and certain of them convert their Class B ordinary
shares into Class A ordinary shares, the remaining holders who retain their Class B ordinary shares may experience increases in their
relative voting power.
Mr. Yi Zhang, our founder, chairman of the board
of directors and chief executive officer, beneficially own all of our issued Class B ordinary shares. These Class B ordinary shares constitute
13.5% of our total issued and outstanding share capital and 82.4% of the aggregate voting power of our total issued and outstanding share
capital due to the disparate voting powers associated with our dual-class share structure. As a result of the dual-class share structure
and the concentration of ownership, holders of Class B ordinary shares have considerable influence over matters such as decisions regarding
mergers and consolidations, election of directors and other significant corporate actions. Such holders may take actions that are not
in the best interest of us or our other shareholders. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control
of our company, which could have the effect of depriving our other shareholders of the opportunity to receive a premium for their shares
as part of a sale of our company and may reduce the price of our ADSs. This concentrated control will limit your ability to influence
corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any potential merger, takeover or other change of control transactions that
holders of Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.
The dual-class structure of our ordinary shares may adversely
affect the trading market for our ADSs.
Certain shareholder advisory firms have announced
changes to their eligibility criteria for inclusion of shares of public companies on certain indices, including the S&P 500, to exclude
companies with multiple classes of shares and companies whose public shareholders hold no more than 5% of total voting power from being
added to such indices. In addition, several shareholder advisory firms have announced their opposition to the use of multiple class structures.
As a result, the dual class structure of our ordinary shares may prevent the inclusion of our ADSs representing Class A ordinary shares
in such indices and may cause shareholder advisory firms to publish negative commentary about our corporate governance practices or otherwise
seek to cause us to change our capital structure. Any such exclusion from indices could result in a less active trading market for our
ADSs. Any actions or publications by shareholder advisory firms critical of our corporate governance practices or capital structure could
also adversely affect the value of our ADSs.
We currently do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable
future and you must rely on price appreciation of our ADSs for return on your investment.
We currently intend to retain most, if not all,
of our available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, we do not expect to pay
any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, you should not rely on an investment in the ADSs as a source for any future
dividend income.
Our board of directors has complete discretion
as to whether to distribute dividends, subject to certain requirements of Cayman Islands law. In addition, our shareholders may by ordinary
resolution declare a dividend, but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our directors. Under Cayman Islands law, a Cayman
Islands exempted company may pay a dividend out of either profit or share premium account, provided that in no circumstances may a dividend
be paid if this would result in the company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. Even if
our board of directors decides to declare and pay dividends, the timing, amount and form of future dividends, if any, will depend on
our future results of operations and cash flow, our capital requirements and surplus, the amount of distributions, if any, received by
us from our subsidiaries, our financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
Accordingly, the return on your investment in the ADSs will likely depend entirely upon any future price appreciation of the ADSs. There
is no guarantee that the ADSs will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which you purchased the ADSs. You may not realize
a return on your investment in our ADSs and you may even lose your entire investment in the ADSs.
We have not determined a specific use for a portion of the net
proceeds from the initial public offering and we may use these proceeds in ways with which you may not agree.
We have not determined a specific use for a portion
of the net proceeds of the initial public offering, and our management have considerable discretion in deciding how to apply these proceeds.
You will not have the opportunity to assess whether the proceeds are being used appropriately before you make your investment decision.
You must rely on the judgment of our management regarding the application of the net proceeds of the initial public offering. We cannot
assure you that the net proceeds will be used in a manner that will improve our results of operations or increase the ADS price, nor
that these net proceeds will be placed only in investments that generate income or appreciate in value.
The sale or potential for sale of substantial amounts
of ADSs could adversely affect their trading price.
Sales of the ADSs in the public market, or the
perception that these sales could occur, could cause the trading price of the ADSs to decline. All ADSs sold in our initial public offering
are freely transferable by persons other than our “affiliates” without restriction or further registration under the Securities
Act. The remaining ordinary shares issued and outstanding have been available for sale, subject to volume and other restrictions as applicable
provided in Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act. To the extent ordinary shares are sold into the market, the trading price of
the ADSs could decline.
Certain holders of our Class A ordinary shares
may cause us to register under the Securities Act the sale of their shares. Registration of these shares under the Securities Act would
result in ADSs representing these shares becoming freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act immediately upon the effectiveness
of such registration. Sales of these registered shares in the form of ADSs in the public market could cause the price of our ADSs to
decline.
Techniques employed by short sellers may drive down the
trading price of the ADSs.
Short selling is the practice of selling securities
that the seller does not own but rather has borrowed from a third party with the intention of buying identical securities back at a later
date to return to the lender. The short seller hopes to profit from a decline in the value of the securities between the sale of the
borrowed securities and the purchase of the replacement shares, as the short seller expects to pay less in that purchase than it received
in the sale. As it is in the short seller’s interest for the price of the security to decline, many short sellers publish, or arrange
for the publication of, negative opinions regarding the relevant issuer and its business prospects in order to create negative market
momentum and generate profits for themselves after selling a security short. These short attacks have, in the past, led to selling of
shares in the market.
Public companies that have substantially all
of their operations in China have been the subject of short selling. Much of the scrutiny and negative publicity has centered on allegations
of a lack of effective internal control over financial reporting resulting in financial and accounting irregularities and mistakes, inadequate
corporate governance policies or a lack of adherence thereto and, in many cases, allegations of fraud. As a result, many of these companies
are now conducting internal and external investigations into the allegations and, in the interim, are subject to shareholder lawsuits
and/or enforcement actions by the SEC or other U.S. authorities.
It is not clear what effect such negative publicity
could have on us. If we were to become the subject of any unfavorable allegations, whether such allegations are proven to be true or
untrue, we could have to expend a significant amount of resources to investigate such allegations and/or defend ourselves. While we would
strongly defend against any such short seller attacks, we may be constrained in the manner in which we can proceed against the relevant
short seller by principles of freedom of speech, applicable state law or issues of commercial confidentiality. Such a situation could
be costly and time-consuming, and could distract our management from growing our business. Even if such allegations are ultimately proven
to be groundless, allegations against us could severely impact our business operations, and any investment in the ADSs could be greatly
reduced or even rendered worthless.
Our memorandum and articles of association contain anti-takeover
provisions that could have a material adverse effect on the rights of holders of our ordinary shares and the ADSs.
Our tenth amended and restated memorandum and
articles of association contain provisions to limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company or cause us to engage in
change-of-control transactions. These provisions could have the effect of depriving our shareholders of an opportunity to sell their
shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of our company in a tender
offer or similar transaction. Our board of directors has the authority, without further action by our shareholders, to issue preferred
shares in one or more series and to fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges and relative participating, optional or special
rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption
and liquidation preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with our ordinary shares, including Class
A ordinary shares represented by ADSs. Preferred shares could be issued quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in
control of our company or make removal of management more difficult. If our board of directors decides to issue preferred shares, the
price of the ADSs may fall and the voting and other rights of the holders of our ordinary shares and the ADSs may be materially and adversely
affected.
Our memorandum and articles of association and the deposit agreement
provide that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (or, if the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a particular dispute, the state courts in New York County, New York)
is the exclusive judicial forum within the U.S. for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising out of or relating
in any way to the federal securities laws of the United States, and any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating in any
way to the ADSs or the deposit agreement, which could limit the ability of holders of our ordinary shares, the ADSs or other securities
to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us, our directors and officers, the depositary, and potentially others.
Our memorandum and articles of association provide
that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (or, if the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a particular dispute, the state courts in New York County, New York) is the
exclusive forum within the United States for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising out of or relating in
any way to the federal securities laws of the United States, regardless of whether such legal suit, action, or proceeding also involves
parties other than our company. The deposit agreement provides that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York (or, if the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a particular
dispute, the state courts in New York County, New York) shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any suit, action or proceeding against
or involving us or the depositary, arising out of or relating in any way to the deposit agreement, including without limitation claims
under the Securities Act of 1933 arising out of or relating in any way to the deposit agreement. The enforceability of similar federal
court choice of forum provisions in other companies’ organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings in the United
States, and it is possible that a court could find this type of provision to be inapplicable or unenforceable. If a court were to find
the federal choice of forum provision contained in our memorandum and articles of association or the deposit agreement to be inapplicable
or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions. If upheld,
the forum selection clause in our memorandum and articles of association, as well as the forum selection provision in the deposit agreement,
may limit a security-holder’s ability to bring a claim against us, our directors and officers, the depositary, and potentially
others in his or her preferred judicial forum, and this limitation may discourage such lawsuits. Holders of our shares or the ADSs will
not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the regulations promulgated thereunder pursuant to the
exclusive forum provision in the memorandum and articles of association and deposit agreement.
The voting rights of holders of ADSs are limited by the terms
of the deposit agreement, and you may not be able to exercise your right to direct the voting of the underlying Class A ordinary shares
represented by your ADSs.
Holders of ADSs do not have the same rights as
our registered shareholders. As a holder of ADSs, you will not have any direct right to attend general meetings of our shareholders or
to cast any votes at such meetings. You will only be able to exercise the voting rights attached to the underlying Class A ordinary shares
represented by your ADSs indirectly by giving voting instructions to the depositary in accordance with the provisions of the deposit
agreement. Where any matter is to be put to a vote at a general meeting where we asked the depositary to solicit your instruction, then
upon receipt of your voting instructions, the depositary will try, as far as is practicable, to vote the underlying Class A ordinary
shares represented by your ADSs in accordance with your instructions, in the case of voting by poll, and in accordance with the voting
instructions received from a majority of ADS holders who provide voting instructions, in the case of voting by show of hands. You will
not be able to directly exercise your right to vote with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares unless you cancel and withdraw
the shares and become the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date for the general meeting.
When a general meeting is convened, you may not
receive sufficient advance notice of the meeting to withdraw the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs and become
the registered holder of such shares to allow you to attend the general meeting and to vote directly with respect to any specific matter
or resolution to be considered and voted upon at the general meeting. In addition, under our memorandum and articles of association,
for the purposes of determining those shareholders who are entitled to attend and vote at any general meeting, our directors may close
our register of members and/or fix in advance a record date for such meeting, and such closure of our register of members or the setting
of such a record date may prevent you from withdrawing the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs and from becoming
the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date, so that you would not be able to attend the general meeting or to vote
directly. Where any matter is to be put to a vote at a general meeting, upon our instruction the depositary will notify you of the upcoming
vote and will arrange to deliver our voting materials to you. We cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time
to ensure that you can instruct the depositary to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs.
In addition, the depositary
and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for their manner of carrying out your voting instructions.
This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to direct how the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs
are voted and you may have no legal remedy if the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs are not voted as you requested.
In addition, in your capacity as an ADS holder, you will not be able to call a shareholders’ meeting.
Further, under the deposit
agreement for the ADSs, if you do not vote, the depositary will give us a discretionary proxy to vote the Class A ordinary shares underlying
your ADSs at shareholders’ meetings if:
| ● | we have instructed
the depositary that we wish a discretionary proxy to be given; |
| ● | we
have confirmed to the depositary that there is no substantial opposition as to a matter to
be voted on at the meeting; and |
| ● | we
have confirmed to the depositary that a matter to be voted on at the meeting would not have
a material adverse impact on shareholders. |
The effect of this discretionary
proxy is that you cannot prevent our Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs from being voted under the circumstances described
above. This may adversely affect your interests and make it more difficult for ADS holders to influence the management of our company.
Holders of our Class A ordinary shares are not subject to this discretionary proxy.
You may not receive cash dividends or other
distributions if the depositary decides it is impractical to make them available to you.
The depositary will pay cash
distributions or other distributions on the ADSs only to the extent that we decide to make distributions on our Class A ordinary shares
or other deposited securities, and we do not have any present plan to pay any cash dividends on our Class A ordinary shares in the foreseeable
future. To the extent that there is a distribution, the depositary has agreed to pay you the cash dividends or other distributions it
or the custodian receives on our shares or other deposited securities after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions
in proportion to the number of shares your ADSs represent. However, the depositary may, at its discretion, decide that it is inequitable
or impractical to make a distribution available to any holders of ADSs. For example, the depositary may determine that it is not practicable
to distribute certain property through the mail, or that the value of certain distributions may be less than the cost of mailing them.
In these cases, the depositary may decide not to distribute such property to you.
You may be subject to limitations on transfer of your ADSs.
Your ADSs are transferable on the books of the
depositary. However, the depositary may close its books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient in connection with the
performance of its duties. The depositary may close its books from time to time for a number of reasons, including in connection with
corporate events such as a rights offering, during which time the depositary needs to maintain an exact number of ADS holders on its
books for a specified period. The depositary may also close its books in emergencies, and on weekends and public holidays. The depositary
may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of the ADSs generally when our share register or the books of the depositary are
closed, or at any time if we or the depositary thinks it is advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government
or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.
You may experience dilution of your holdings due to inability
to participate in rights offerings.
We may, from time to time, distribute rights
to our shareholders, including rights to acquire securities. Under the deposit agreement, the depositary will not distribute rights to
holders of ADSs unless the distribution and sale of rights and the securities to which these rights relate are either exempt from registration
under the Securities Act with respect to all holders of ADSs, or are registered under the provisions of the Securities Act. The depositary
may, but is not required to, attempt to sell these undistributed rights to third parties, and may allow the rights to lapse. We may be
unable to establish an exemption from registration under the Securities Act, and we are under no obligation to file a registration statement
with respect to these rights or underlying securities or to endeavor to have a registration statement declared effective. Accordingly,
holders of ADSs may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution of their holdings as a result.
You may face difficulties in protecting your interests,
and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited, because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.
We are an exempted company incorporated under
the laws of the Cayman Islands. Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Act (As
Revised) of the Cayman Islands and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against our directors,
actions by our minority shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed
by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial
precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from the common law of England, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority,
but are not binding, on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors under
Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedents in some jurisdictions in the
United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states,
such as Delaware, have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition,
Cayman Islands companies may not have the standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States.
Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies
like us have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of
these companies (other than the memorandum and articles of association of these companies, special resolutions of these companies, register
of mortgages and charges of these companies, and a list of current directors of these companies). Our directors have discretion under
our tenth amended and restated articles of association, to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records
may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult
for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders
in connection with a proxy contest.
As a result of all of the above, our public shareholders
may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of our board of directors
or controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States.
Certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders
may not be enforceable.
We
are a Cayman Islands exempted company and most of our assets are located in China. All of our current operations are conducted in China.
In addition, most of our current directors and senior executive officers are nationals and residents of jurisdictions other than the
United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the
United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise.
Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of China may render you unable to enforce
a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers.
ADSs holders may not be entitled to a jury trial with
respect to claims arising under the deposit agreement, which could result in less favorable outcomes to the plaintiff(s) in any such
action.
The deposit agreement governing the ADSs representing
our Class A ordinary shares provides that the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (or, if the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a particular dispute, in the state courts
in New York County, New York) shall have exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine claims arising out of or relating in any way to
the deposit agreement (including claims arising under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act) and in that regard, to the fullest extent
permitted by law, ADS holders waive the right to a jury trial of any claim they may have against us or the depositary arising out of
or relating to our shares, the ADSs or the deposit agreement, including any claim under the U.S. federal securities laws.
If we or the depositary opposed a jury trial
demand based on the waiver, the court would determine whether the waiver was enforceable based on the facts and circumstances of that
case in accordance with the applicable state and federal law. To our knowledge, the enforceability of a contractual pre-dispute jury
trial waiver in connection with claims arising under the federal securities laws has not been finally adjudicated by the United States
Supreme Court. However, we believe that a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision is generally enforceable, including under
the laws of the State of New York, which govern the deposit agreement. In determining whether to enforce a contractual pre-dispute jury
trial waiver provision, courts will generally consider whether a party knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waives the right to a
jury trial. We believe that this is the case with respect to the deposit agreement and the ADSs. It is advisable that you consult legal
counsel regarding the jury waiver provision before investing in the ADSs.
If you or any other holders or beneficial owners
of ADSs bring a claim against us or the depositary in connection with matters arising under the deposit agreement or the ADSs, including
claims under federal securities laws, you or such other holder or beneficial owner may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to
such claims, which may have the effect of limiting and discouraging lawsuits against us or the depositary, lead to increased costs to
bring a claim, limited access to information and other imbalances of resources between such holder and us, or limit such holder’s
ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that such holder finds favorable. If a lawsuit is brought against us or the depositary under
the deposit agreement, it may be heard only by a judge or justice of the applicable trial court, which would be conducted according to
different civil procedures and may result in different outcomes than a trial by jury would have had, including results that could be
less favorable to the plaintiff(s) in any such action.
Nevertheless, if this jury trial waiver provision
is not enforced, to the extend a court action proceeds, it would proceed under the terms of the deposit agreement with a jury trial.
No condition, stipulation or provision of the deposit agreement or ADSs shall relieve us or the depositary from our respective obligations
to comply with the Securities Act and the Exchange Act nor serve as a waiver by any holder or beneficial owner of ADSs of compliance
with the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
An ADS holder’s right to pursue claims against the depositary
is limited by the terms of the deposit agreement.
Under the deposit agreement, any legal suit,
action or proceeding against or involving us or the depositary, arising out of or relating in any way to the deposit agreement or the
transactions contemplated thereby or by virtue of owning the ADSs may only be instituted in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York (or, if the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York lacks subject matter jurisdiction
over a particular dispute, in the state courts in New York County, New York), and a holder of our ADSs, will have irrevocably waived
any objection which such holder may have to the laying of venue of any such proceeding, and irrevocably submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction
of such courts in any such action or proceeding. However, the enforceability of similar federal court choice of forum provisions in other
companies’ organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings in the United States, and it is possible that a court
could find this type of provision to be inapplicable or unenforceable. Accepting or consenting to this forum selection provision does
not represent you are waiving compliance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
Furthermore, investors cannot waive compliance with the U.S. federal securities laws and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
We
are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act and may take advantage of certain reduced reporting requirements.
As
a company with less than US$1.235 billion in revenues for our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company”
pursuant to the JOBS Act. Therefore, we may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements that are otherwise applicable
generally to public companies. These provisions include exemption from the auditor attestation requirement under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, or Section 404, in the assessment of the emerging growth company’s internal control over financial reporting and permission
to delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. As a result, if
we elect not to comply with such reporting and other requirements, in particular the auditor attestation requirements, our investors
may not have access to certain information they may deem important.
The
JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company does not need to comply with any new or revised financial accounting standards
until such date that a private company is otherwise required to comply with such new or revised accounting standards.
We
are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain provisions
applicable to U.S. domestic public companies.
Because
we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the securities rules and regulations
in the United States that are applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including:
|
● |
the rules under the Exchange
Act requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q |
|
● |
or current reports on Form
8-K; |
|
● |
the sections of the Exchange
Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents, or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act; |
|
● |
the sections of the Exchange
Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit
from trades made in a short period of time; |
|
● |
the selective disclosure rules
by issuers of material nonpublic information under Regulation FD; and |
|
● |
certain audit committee independence
requirements in Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. |
We
are required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year. Press releases relating to financial
results and material events are also furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish
to the SEC is less extensive and less timely compared to that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers. As a result,
you may not be afforded the same protections or information that would be made available to you were you investing in a U.S. domestic
issuer.
We
believe that we were likely a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for our 2022 taxable year, and we anticipate that we will likely be a PFIC in 2023 and
potentially also in future years, which will result in adverse federal income tax consequences to U.S. investors in the ADSs or
ordinary shares.
For
U.S. federal income tax purposes, a non-U.S. corporation, such as our company, will be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, if either
(1) 75% or more of its gross income for such year consists of certain types of “passive” income (the “income test”);
or (2) 50% or more of the value of its assets (generally determined on the basis of a quarterly average) during such year is attributable
to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income (the “asset test”). For purposes of the above calculations,
a non-U.S. corporation that owns (or is treated as owning for U.S. federal income tax purposes), directly or indirectly, at least 25%
by value of the shares of another corporation is treated as if it held its proportionate share of the assets of the other corporation
and received directly its proportionate share of the income of the other corporation.
Based
on the composition of our income and assets and the estimated value of our assets, which are based on the average price of the ADSs
in 2022, we believe that we were likely a PFIC for our taxable year ended December 31, 2022. Our PFIC status depends primarily on
the average value of our assets, which may be in determined, in large part, by reference to our market capitalization. Because our
market capitalization has declined substantially since our initial public offering, if the value of our assets is determined by
reference to our market capitalization and the market price of the ADSs does not increase sufficiently, we anticipate that we will
likely be a PFIC for our taxable year 2023, and may also be a PFIC in future taxable years.
If
we are or were a PFIC for any taxable year during which you hold or held ADSs or ordinary shares, (including 2022), we generally will
continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to you for all succeeding years during which you hold ADSs or ordinary shares. You generally
will be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences, including increased tax liability on disposition gains and “excess
distributions,” and additional reporting requirements. This will continue to be the case even if we cease to be a PFIC for a subsequent
taxable year, unless you make one of certain elections. See “Item 10. Additional Information—10.E Taxation—United States
Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations.”
We
incur increased costs as a result of being a public company, particularly after we cease to qualify as an “emerging growth company.”
We
are a public company and expect to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, impose various requirements on the corporate governance
practices of public companies. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make
some corporate activities more time-consuming and costly.
As
a result of becoming a public company, we have increased the number of independent directors and adopted policies regarding internal
controls and disclosure controls and procedures. We also believe that operating as a public company make it more difficult and more expensive
for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur
substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. In addition, we incur additional costs associated with our public
company reporting requirements. It is also more difficult for us to find qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive
officers. We are constantly evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules and regulations, and we cannot predict
or estimate with any degree of certainty the amount of additional costs we may further incur in the future.
In
addition, after we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” we expect to incur significant expenses and devote substantial
management effort toward ensuring compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the other rules
and regulations of the SEC.
ITEM 4.
INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
4.A.
History and Development of the Company
We
commenced our operations in China from June 2014 through Shenzhen Zhangmenren Education Consultation Co., Ltd., or Shenzhen Zhangmenren.
Our
holding company, Global Online Education Inc., was incorporated in November 2017 under the laws of the Cayman Islands, and later changed
its name to Zhangmen Education Inc. in April 2021. Shortly after its incorporation, Global Online Education Inc. established as a wholly
owned subsidiary in Hong Kong, Global Online Education HK Limited. Global Online Education HK Limited established two wholly-owned subsidiaries
in China, Shanghai Zhangxue Education Technology Co., Ltd., or Shanghai Zhangxue, and Shanghai Zhangneng Information Technology Co.,
Ltd., in April 2018 and March 2019, respectively.
In
November 2016 and February 2019, Shanghai Zhangda Education Technology Co., Ltd., or Shanghai Zhangda, and Shanghai Zhangshi Education
and Training Co., Ltd., or Shanghai Zhangshi, were established, respectively.
Due
to restrictions and prohibitions imposed by PRC laws and regulations on foreign ownership of companies that engage in the provision of
value-added telecommunication services and other restricted businesses, Shanghai Zhangxue entered into a series of contractual arrangements
with Shenzhen Zhangmenren, Shanghai Zhangda, and Shanghai Zhangshi, and their respectively shareholders. In April 2018, Shanghai Zhangxue
entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Shenzhen Zhangmenren and its shareholders. In September 2020, Shanghai Zhangxue
entered into a new series of contractual arrangements with Shenzhen Zhangmenren and its shareholders to replace the previous contractual
arrangements. In April 2018, Shanghai Zhangxue entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Shanghai Zhangda and its shareholders.
In February 2019, Shanghai Zhangxue entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Shanghai Zhangshi and its shareholders.
In
June 2021, our ADSs commenced trading on the NYSE under the symbol “ZME.” We raised, from our initial public offering and
from the underwriters’ exercise of option to purchase additional ADSs, approximately US$38,747,985 in net proceeds after deducting
underwriting commissions and the offering expenses payable by us.
We
terminated our Academic AST Business, as part of our efforts to fully comply with new PRC regulatory requirements adopted by the PRC
government in the second half of 2021.
In
June 2022, we received a delisting notice from NYSE. On June 28, 2022, we were delisted from the NYSE when the staff of the NYSE filed
a Form 25 Notification of Delisting. Our ADSs have been quoted on the OTC Pink Limited Information under the symbol “ZMENY”
since the NYSE suspended the trading of our ADSs on June 2, 2022.
In
September 2022, we entered in to a definitive share purchase agreement (the “Share Purchase Agreement”) with Eternal Zenith,
an entity controlled by Mr. Jiajun Wu, a senior management member of the Company affiliated with our controlling shareholder. Pursuant
to the Share Purchase Agreement, Mr. Jiajun Wu, through Eternal Zenith, would acquire all of our K-12 Business, including all associated
assets and liabilities, for a nominal consideration. In connection and concurrently with the execution of the Share Purchase Agreement,
we entered into a reorganization agreement (the “Reorganization Agreement”) with certain of our subsidiaries and variable
interest entities, pursuant to which all assets and liabilities of our non-K-12 business would be transferred to Shanghai Zhangda controlled
by Shanghai Zhangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. (“Shanghai Zhangxinrui”), a newly established company wholly-owned by the Company
through our Hong Kong holding company (the transactions set forth in the Reorganization Agreement, collectively, the “Internal
Reorganization”). Upon consummation of the Internal Reorganization, the K-12 Business would be solely conducted by the subsidiaries
and the variable interest entities controlled by GOE HK, all of which would then be acquired by Eternal Zenith. The disposal of the K-12
Business and the Internal Reorganization are crucial steps for us to fully comply with the latest PRC regulatory requirements. We have
also initiated a strategic shift to become an education company focused on the offering of STEAM courses and development of SaaS solutions
and smart devices since 2021.
In
September 2022, Shanghai Zhangxinrui, the WFOE, entered into a new series of contractual arrangements with Shanghai Zhangda, the VIE,
and its shareholder to replace the previous contractual arrangements. As a result of our direct ownership in Shanghai Zhangxinrui and
the contractual arrangements with the VIE, we are regarded as the primary beneficiary of the VIE for accounting purposes. We have consolidated
the financial results of the VIE in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, to the extent the conditions
for consolidation of the VIE under U.S. GAAP are satisfied. For more details and risks relating to the VIE structure, please see “—4.C.
Organizational Structure—Contractual Arrangements with The VIE and The VIE’s Shareholder” and “Item 3. Key Information—3.D.
Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure.”
Our
corporate headquarters is located at No.1666 North Sichuan Road, Gaobao Building, Hongkou District, Shanghai, The People’s Republic
of China. Our telephone number at this address is + 86 166 2851 3671. Our registered office in the Cayman Islands is located at Maples
Corporate Services Limited, PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands. Our agent for service of process in the
United States is Cogency Global Inc. located at 122 East 42nd Street, 18th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10168. Our principal website is www.zhangmenkid.com.
The information contained on our website is not a part of this annual report.
The
SEC maintains an internet site at www.sec.gov that contains reports, information statements, and other information regarding issuers
that file electronically with the SEC.
4.B.
Business Overview
We
are a leading online education company in China focused on the development of a comprehensive offering of STEAM courses, SaaS solutions
and smart devices to digitally empower the education industry.
We
have established a portfolio of well-recognized online education brands known for delivering exceptional learning outcomes to our students.
Over the years, we have successfully garnered wide recognition in the industry and established “Zhangmen” as a trusted online
education brand. The effectiveness of our tutoring services is demonstrated by the strong track record of significant academic improvement
and the outstanding performance of our students.
We
believe that above our deep industry expertise sits a differentiating theme of our company – a constant drive to deliver better
educational content and operational efficiency through data analytics and other advanced technology.
Since
our inception, we have been pursuing operational efficiency and scalability through building and optimizing our proprietary technology
infrastructure and business intelligence system. To streamline our operations, we have digitalized each critical step of our operations
and centralized our key operating functions, including student acquisition and conversion, curriculum development, and teacher management.
Powered by our centralized business intelligence system, we have optimized sales and marketing efficiency, achieved high student satisfaction
and retention, improved our teachers’ utilization and productivity. We aim to maximize lifetime value of each student with a variety of programs tailored to different age groups.
Our Offerings
Online
Tutoring Services
After
the disposal of the K-12 Business, we continued to offer tutoring services strategically focused on STEAM courses. Our STEAM courses
offering covers a diverse array of subjects, including language skills, arts, music and computer coding. We offer our STEAM courses to
students aged from 6 to 10 through Zhangmen Kids and Xiaoli. We generally collect tuition fees in full upon enrollment, and our tuition
fees are generally charged based on the number of class hours per paid course package.
|
● |
Zhangmen Kids.
In March 2018, we launched Zhangmen Kids, our online formative education services for children aged from 6 to 10. We offer a diverse
array of STEAM subjects through Zhangmen Kids, including arts and language skills. |
|
● |
Xiaoli. In August
2020, we launched Xiaoli, our online formative education services for children aged from 6 to 8. We offer a wide range of STEAM subjects
through Xiaoli, including arts, literacy, reading, computer coding, and others. Our in-house developed courses are pre-recorded utilizing
our proprietary course content, and delivered in the format of animation with AI-powered interactions, to provide knowledge to children
through vivid animation and interesting gamified features. |
Education-centric
SaaS Solutions
As
part of our business transition efforts, we recently launched our education-centric SaaS solutions, namely OutClass, which are aimed
to digitally empower the educational institutions in China and overseas. Currently, we are in an early stage of developing our OutClass
SaaS solutions.
Smart
Devices
We
have developed technology-driven smart devices to provide a seamless and enjoyable learning experience for users at all
ages, which primarily include Zhangmen Learning Pad and Zhangmen Translation Pen.
|
● |
Zhangmen Learning Pad.
With its intuitive interface and powerful hardware, Zhangmen Learning Pad is pre-installed with various functions, including
educational applications, e-books, dictionaries and interactive games, presenting students with a fun and interactive option to hone
their skills and expand their knowledge. |
|
● |
Zhangmen Translation
Pen. Equipped with the industry-leading optical recognition technology, Zhangmen Translation Pen provide users with
instant access to translation services anywhere and anytime. Users can simply scan the words with the translation pen, and it will
instantly display the translations on its built-in screen. |
Our Teachers
We
believe teachers are the pillars of the education industry. As of December 31, 2022, we had a pool of 257 part-time teachers. Teachers
are attracted to us primarily by our reputable brand name, large student base, well-established training programs, competitive compensation
package, flexible working hours and locations, as well as career development opportunities.
Recruitment
We
routinely recruit teachers through online recruiting channels, online advertisements, recruiting agencies and internal referrals from
our existing teachers. Candidates must go through our rigorous interview process to be qualified to become our teacher, including resume
screening, written tests, in-person interviews, and mock courses. We are highly selective in recruiting our teachers.
Training
Our training program begins with introducing
teaching virtues, education philosophy, professional competence and online teaching skills and focuses on improving their professional
knowledge of academic subjects, teaching service abilities, and personalized assessment of individual students’ performance. We
also offer on-the-job training programs to improve teaching skills, including training teachers to analyze students’ performance
based on their examination results and improving teaching plans, and allowing teachers to stay abreast of local curriculums.
Evaluation
and Career Development
Our
teachers are evaluated taking into consideration various quantitative and qualitative key performance indicators, or KPIs, including
student-teacher interactions, parent satisfaction rate and automatic system ratings. We have implemented an internal quality control
system to monitor their teaching quality. We utilize our AI technologies to monitor the performance of teachers for each course and provide
evaluation to teachers.
Our
promotion standard and career path are clear and transparent. To incentivize our teachers, they receive competitive compensation and
are promoted based on an evaluation of a set of KPIs on a semi-annual basis. We believe our teacher evaluation system not only nurtures
teachers, but also incentivize self-improvement.
Teaching
Support
We
empower our teachers with comprehensive smart teaching tools to set them free from prolonged administrative and operational matters so
that they can focus on their teaching.
Our
system can automatically generate class schedules based on the students’ requests and teachers’ availability. We have a comprehensive
content library that is constantly refined to align with localized curriculum and examination objectives. Leveraging our large database
and AI algorithm advantages, we automatically generate course materials and practice exercises based on the tags in relation to the students’
learning progress, allowing teachers to focus on teaching itself, which increases their overall efficiency and productivity.
Online
Education Platform
Our
online courses are offered through our PC terminal and mobile applications in a live streaming format, other than Xiaoli, which uses
pre-recorded videos. Students may attend online courses, review course materials, complete pre-class quizzes, watch past online courses,
and complete practice exercises and problem sets through these portals.
We
provide various interactive features to create an immersive learning experience. Students may raise questions to our teachers in class,
interact with other students through live-chat box, and contact our IT team to provide real-time technical support. Teachers may utilize
the interactive board to highlight specific text phrases or knowledge points to students.
We
have built a user-friendly interface for students accessing our online courses through our PC terminal and mobile apps. Our main mobile
apps include Zhangmen Kids and Xiaoli.
Tuition
Fees
Our
tuition fees are charged based on the number of class hours per paid course package for Zhangmen Kids. Our course fees are generally
collected in full upon enrollment. For Zhangmen Kids, if students withdraw from a course at any time, we offer refunds for any remaining
classes to the students after charging an administration fee. The tuition fees for Xiaoli courses are non-refundable as such pre-recorded
courses are delivered to students upon their enrollment.
Sales
and Marketing
Marketing
channels
We
are focused on promoting our Zhangmen brand to increase the overall effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts, mainly through
word-of-mouth referrals by our students and parents. We promote our platform through a variety of offline marketing and brand promotion
activities, such as precise marketing campaign events.
Sales
Process
Referrals
We
generate sales leads from word-of-mouth referrals by our students and parents. We believe our high- quality course offerings and satisfactory
student experience will continue to contribute to word-of-mouth referrals.
Trial
lessons
The
sales leads generated by our various marketing channels are initially handled by our tele-marketing teams. The primary function of our
tele-marketing personnel is to encourage prospective students who have registered their information on our online and mobile platforms
to sign-up for trial lessons, and to gather basic information and requirement of the students.
We
offer trial lessons to prospective students. In addition to giving prospective students a preview of our immersive learning experience,
we also use trial lessons to assess the learning progress of prospective students. Our system will automatically recommend suitable teachers
to students according to their respective characteristics and learning objectives. If the student is satisfied with the trial course,
our marketing team will facilitate the students and parents to complete the purchase of our course packages. Students who have enrolled
in one program can also select other programs based upon their evolving needs.
Our
Student Service Staff
After
a student has purchased a course package, the student is assigned to a student service staff member who will help with class scheduling
and address questions from the student and parents from time to time. The student service staff member will track the learning progress,
assist students with future lesson bookings and course selection to increase their activity level on our platform and regularly communicate
with our students and parents to solicit their feedback on our education program, such as teaching quality and learning experience. We
engage reputable third-party service providers to enlist ideal candidates for our student service staff. Applicants must go through our
interviews and written tests.
We
use various KPIs to measure the performance of our student service staff, including student-teacher interactions, parent satisfaction
rate and automatic system ratings. Our student service staff receive base salary and merit-based bonuses depending on the KPIs. We also
offer clear and transparent promotion standard and career path for them.
Technology
and Infrastructure
Our
products and technology team is responsible for maintaining the reliability of our network infrastructure, developing big data and AI
technologies, and operating and upgrading our business intelligent system.
Network
Infrastructure
We
have built a reliable and stable network infrastructure to ensure high availability and a low risk of downtime. We currently utilize
third-party clouds in China to host our network infrastructure. Our IT department regularly monitors the performance of our website,
mobile apps, and infrastructure to enable us to respond quickly to potential problems.
Big
Data and AI
Our
big data and AI technologies significantly improve the efficiency and precision of our content development and recommendation efforts.
Our
algorithm technologies, together with our natural language technologies, can generate problem sets, examination papers and knowledge
points recorded in our system. We have applied various AI and machine learning technologies in multiple areas, such as personalized course
recommendation. Our algorithm-based recommendation system provides the foundation for our capabilities to automatically generate course
materials. Through in-depth analysis of weaknesses and areas for improvement on class-wide and personal levels and the identification
of the underlying commonalities among questions in terms of difficulty levels and knowledge points, the recommendation system can recommend
course materials and practice exercises tailored to the academic weakness of each student, so as to maximize the effectiveness and efficiency
of learning. Through in-depth analysis of in-class interactions with students, teaching styles, feedback from students and teachers and
locations, the recommendation system can also recommend the most suitable teacher for each specific student based on their attributes.
Our
AI system evaluates each online course by analyzing student-teacher interaction frequency. We will review the lesson if the frequency
is lower than our standard, which is used to ensure the consistent high-quality of our online courses. Our AI system can also automatically
handle course scheduling, course material and practice exercise generation, and complaints from students and parents.
Business
Intelligence System
We
have adopted a business intelligence system which standardizes our operations and enables us to share insights accumulated across different
service offerings and quickly launch new service offerings.
We
have digitalized each critical step of our operations and centralized our key operating functions, including student acquisition and
conversion, curriculum development, and teacher management. We free our teachers from prolonged administrative and monotonous tasks,
allowing them to focus on their teaching and deliver an effective learning experience. Our system empowers our employees with automated
workflows, such as scheduling courses, analyzing student assignments, and tracking student feedback.
Data Privacy
and Security
We
are committed to protecting our students and parents’ personal information and privacy. We have established and implemented a strict
platform-wide policy on data collection, processing and usage. We collect personal information and other data that is related to the
services we provide, with students and parents’ prior consent.
To
ensure the confidentiality and integrity of our data, we maintain a comprehensive and rigorous data security program. We anonymize and
encrypt confidential personal information and take other technological measures to ensure the secure processing, transmission and usage
of data. We have also established stringent internal protocols under which we grant classified access to confidential personal data only
to limited employees with access authorization.
We
back up our core data on a real-time basis and other data on a daily basis in separate and various secured data back-up systems to minimize
the risk of data loss.
However,
due to laws and regulations in relation to data privacy and security are constantly evolving and can be subject to differing interpretations
or significant change, we cannot assure you that we can always be compliant with all such laws and regulations or at all. See “Item
3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry—Because we collect, store, process
and use data, some of which contains sensitive personal information, we face concerns over the collection, improper use, storage or disclosure
of personal information, which could discourage current and potential users from using our services, damage our reputation, face regulatory
scrutiny, and in turn materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
Content
Monitoring
We
implement strict monitoring procedures to remove inappropriate or illegal content from our live course, messages and other content on
our platform.
Our
dedicated content monitoring personnel are responsible for monitoring and preventing the release of inappropriate or illegal content
on our platform. When any inappropriate or illegal content is identified, we promptly remove the content.
Our
content monitoring team employs systematic monitoring procedures that include machine screening and manual review based on the latest
laws and regulations.
Competition
The
online education industry in China is competitive. We face competition for our tutoring service offerings from online and offline providers
of courses and educational content. We also face competition for our education-centric SaaS solution providers from providers of digital
solutions, and for our smart device offerings from manufacturers of hardware or smart devices.
We
compete primarily on the basis of the following factors:
| ● | quality
of contents and service; |
| ● | accumulated
user, student and customer bases; |
| ● | pricing
of current offerings and the development of new offerings; |
| ● | big
data and AI capabilities; and |
We
believe that we are well positioned to effectively compete on the basis of the factors listed above. However, some of our current or
future competitors may have longer operating histories, greater brand recognition, or greater financial, technical or marketing resources
than we do.
Intellectual
Property
Our
patents, trademarks, copyrights, domain names, trade secrets and other intellectual property rights distinguish our courses and services
from those of our competitors and contribute to our ability to compete in our target markets. We rely on a combination of copyright and
trademark law, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements with employees to protect our intellectual property rights. In
addition, under the employment agreements we enter into with our employees, they acknowledge that the intellectual property made by them
in connection with their employment with us are our property. We also regularly monitor any infringement or misappropriation of our intellectual
property rights.
As
of December 31, 2022, we have registered 6 domain names relating to our business, including our www.zhangmenkid.com website, 17
trademarks in China, and we have submitted 8 software copyright applications in China.
Insurance
We
do not maintain any liability insurance or property insurance policies covering students, equipment and facilities for injuries, death
or losses due to fire, earthquake, flood or any other disaster. Consistent with customary industry practice in China, we do not maintain
business interruption insurance, nor do we maintain key-man life insurance.
Seasonality
Our
results of operations are subject to seasonal fluctuations in market conditions. We generally generate higher net revenues in the second
and fourth quarters in a given year because of the increased paid student enrollments for the spring and fall semesters. Overall, the
historical seasonality of our business has been relatively mild due to our rapid growth but seasonality may increase in the future. Due
to our limited operating history, the seasonal trends that we have experienced in the past may not be indicative of our future operating
results.
Enforceability
of Civil Liabilities
Cayman
Islands
We
are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands as an exempted company with limited liability. We enjoy the following benefits:
| ● | political
and economic stability; |
| ● | an
effective judicial system; |
| ● | the
absence of exchange control or currency restrictions; and |
| ● | the
availability of professional and support services. |
However,
certain disadvantages accompany incorporation in the Cayman Islands. These disadvantages include, but are not limited to, the following:
| ● | the
Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws as compared to the United States and these securities laws provide significantly
less protection to investors; and |
| ● | Cayman
Islands companies may not have standing to sue before the federal courts of the United States. |
Our
constitutional documents do not contain provisions requiring that disputes, including those arising under the securities laws of the
United States, between us, our officers, directors and shareholders, be arbitrated.
Substantially
all of our operations are conducted in China, and a most of our assets are located in China. All of our directors and executive officers
are nationals or residents of jurisdictions other than the United States and a substantial portion of their assets are located outside
the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for a shareholder to effect service of process within the United States upon these
persons, or to enforce against us or them judgments obtained in United States courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability
provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States.
We
have appointed Cogency Global Inc. as our agent upon whom process may be served in any action brought against us under the securities
laws of the United States.
Maples
and Calder (Hong Kong) LLP, our Cayman Islands legal counsel has advised us that there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the
Cayman Islands would:
| ● | recognize
or enforce judgments of United States courts obtained against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions
of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States; or |
| ● | entertain
original actions brought in each respective jurisdiction against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the securities laws
of the United States or any state in the United States. |
We
have been advised by our Cayman Islands legal counsel, Maples and Calder (Hong Kong) LLP, that the courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely
(i) to recognize or enforce against us judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the
securities laws of the United States or any State; and (ii) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, to impose liabilities
against us predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any State, so far as the liabilities
imposed by those provisions are penal in nature. In those circumstances, although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands
of judgments obtained in the United States, the courts of the Cayman Islands, will, at common law, recognize and enforce a foreign money
judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without retrial on the merits based on the principle that a judgment of a competent
foreign court imposes upon the judgment debtor an obligation to pay the sum for which judgment has been given provided certain conditions
are met. For such a foreign judgment to be enforced in the Cayman Islands, such judgment must be final and conclusive and for a liquidated
sum, and must not be in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same matter,
impeachable on the grounds of fraud or obtained in a manner, and or be of a kind the enforcement of which is, contrary to natural justice
or the public policy of the Cayman Islands (awards of punitive or multiple damages may well be held to be contrary to public policy).
A Cayman Islands court may stay enforcement proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.
PRC
We
have been advised by Tian Yuan Law Firm, our PRC legal counsel, that there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the PRC would enforce
judgments of United States courts or Cayman courts obtained against us or these persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions
of the United States federal and state securities laws. Tian Yuan Law Firm has further advised us that the recognition and enforcement
of foreign judgments are provided for under PRC Civil Procedures Law. PRC courts may recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance
with the requirements of PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between China and the country where the judgment is made or
on reciprocity between jurisdictions. China does not have any treaties or other form of reciprocity with the United States or the Cayman
Islands that provide for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures
Law, courts in the PRC will not enforce a foreign judgment against us or our directors and officers if they decide that the judgment
violates the basic principles of PRC law or national sovereignty, security or public interest. As a result, it is uncertain whether and
on what basis a PRC court would enforce a judgment rendered by a court in the United States or in the Cayman Islands. Under the PRC Civil
Procedures Law, foreign shareholders may originate actions based on PRC law against us in the PRC, if they can establish sufficient nexus
to the PRC for a PRC court to have jurisdiction, and meet other procedural requirements, including, among others, the plaintiff must
have a direct interest in the case, and there must be a concrete claim, a factual basis and a cause for the suit. However, it would be
difficult for foreign shareholders to establish sufficient nexus to the PRC by virtue only of holding the ADSs or our Ordinary Shares.
Regulation
Regulation
Relating to Foreign Investment
On
March 15, 2019, the National People’s Congress promulgated the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020
and replaced the trio of laws regulating foreign investment in China, namely, the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the
Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law, together with their implementation
rules and ancillary regulations. The foreign-invested enterprises established prior to the effective of the Foreign Investment Law may
keep their corporate forms, among other things, within five years after January 1, 2020. Pursuant to the Foreign Investment Law, “foreign
investors” means natural persons, enterprises, or other organizations of a foreign country, “foreign-invested enterprises”,
or FIEs, means any enterprise established under PRC law that is wholly or partially invested by foreign investors and “foreign
investment” means any foreign investor’s direct or indirect investment in mainland China, including: (i) establishing FIEs
in mainland China either individually or jointly with other investors; (ii) obtaining stock shares, stock equity, property shares, other
similar interests in Chinese domestic enterprises; (iii) investing in new projects in mainland China either individually or jointly with
other investors; and (iv) making investment through other means provided by laws, administrative regulations, or State Council provisions.
The
Foreign Investment Law stipulates that China implements the management system of pre-establishment national treatment plus a negative
list to foreign investment and the government generally will not expropriate foreign investment, except under special circumstances,
in which case it will provide fair and reasonable compensation to foreign investors. Foreign investors are barred from investing in prohibited
industries on the negative list and must comply with the specified requirements when investing in restricted industries on that list.
When a license is required to enter a certain industry, the foreign investor must apply for one, and the government must treat the application
the same as one by a domestic enterprise, except where laws or regulations provide otherwise. In addition, foreign investors or FIEs
are required to file information reports and foreign investment shall be subject to the national security review. In addition, the Implementation
Rules of the Foreign Investment Law, effective on January 1, 2020, clarifies that the Foreign Investment Law and its implementation rules
also apply to investments by FIEs in China.
On
December 26, 2019, the Supreme People’s Court of China promulgated the Interpretations on Certain Issues Regarding the Application
of Foreign Investment Law, effective on January 1, 2020, pursuant to which “investment contracts” are defined as relevant
agreements formed as a result of direct or indirect investments in China by foreign investors, namely, foreign individuals, foreign enterprises
or other foreign organizations, including contracts for establishment of foreign investment enterprises, share transfer contracts, equity
transfer contracts, contracts for transfer of property or other similar interests, contracts for newly-built projects and etc. Any claim
to invalidate an investment contract will be supported by courts if such investment contract is decided to be entered into for purposes
of making foreign investments in the “prohibited industries” under the negative list or for purposes of investing in the
“restricted industries” without satisfaction of conditions set out in the negative list.
On
December 19, 2020, the NDRC and the MOFCOM jointly promulgated the Measures on the Security Review of Foreign Investment, effective on
January 18, 2021, which sets forth provisions concerning the security review mechanism on foreign investment, including the types of
investments subject to review, review scopes and procedures, among others. The Office of the Working Mechanism of the Security Review
of Foreign Investment (the “Office of the Working Mechanism”) will be established under the NDRC, who will carry out routine
work of security review on foreign investment. Foreign investor or relevant parties in China must declare the security review to the
Office of the Working Mechanism prior to (i) the investments in the military industry, military industrial supporting industry and other
fields relating to the security of national defense, and investments in areas surrounding military facilities and military industry facilities;
and (ii) investments in important agricultural products, important energy and resources, important equipment manufacturing, important
infrastructure, important transport services, important cultural products and services, important information technology and internet
products and services, important financial services, key technologies and other important fields relating to national security, and obtain
control in the target enterprise. Control exists when the foreign investor (i) holds over 50% equity interests in the target, (ii) has
voting rights that can materially impact on the resolutions of the board of directors or shareholders meeting of the target even when
it holds less than 50% equity interests in the target, or (iii) has material impact on the target’s business decisions, human resources,
accounting and technology, etc.
Regulation
Relating to Foreign Investment Restrictions
According
to the latest Special Administrative Measures for the Entry of Investment (Negative List), or the Negative List, promulgated by the Ministry
of Commerce, or the MOFCOM, and the National Development and Reform Commission, or the NDRC, effective on January 1, 2022, the provision
of value-added telecommunications services falls in the restricted industries and the percentage of foreign ownership cannot exceed 50%
(except for e-commerce, domestic multi-party communication, store-and-forward and call center). The latest negative list further provides
that domestic companies engaged in foreign investment prohibited business and intend to offer and list securities in overseas markets
shall obtain approval from relevant government authorities.
The
Regulations on Administration of Foreign-Invested Telecommunications Enterprises, or the FITE Regulations, the latest amendment of which
became effective on May 1, 2022, are the key regulations for foreign direct investment in telecommunications companies in China. The
FITE Regulations stipulates that the foreign investor of a telecommunications enterprise is prohibited from holding more than 50% of
the equity interest in an FIE that provides value-added telecommunications services, unless otherwise provided by the relevant laws and
regulations. Moreover, foreign investors that intend to invest in or establish a value-added telecommunications enterprise operating
the value-added telecommunications business must obtain approvals from MIIT, which retain considerable discretion in granting approvals.
On
July 13, 2006, the MIIT, issued the Circular on Strengthening the Administration of Foreign Investment in Value-added Telecommunications
Services, which requires that (i) foreign investors can only operate a telecommunications business in China through establishing a telecommunications
enterprise with a valid telecommunications business operation license; (ii) domestic license holders are prohibited from leasing, transferring
or selling telecommunications business operation licenses to foreign investors in any form, or providing any resource, sites or facilities
to foreign investors to facilitate the unlicensed operation of telecommunications business in China; (iii) value-added telecommunications
services providers or their shareholders must directly own the domain names and registered trademarks they use in their daily operations;
(iv) each value-added telecommunications services provider must have the necessary facilities for its approved business operations and
maintain such facilities in the geographic regions covered by its license; and (v) all value-added telecommunications services providers
should improve network and information security, enact relevant information safety administration regulations and set up emergency plans
to ensure network and information safety. The provincial communications administration bureaus, as local authorities in charge of regulating
telecommunications services, may revoke the value-added telecommunications business operation licenses of those who fail to comply with
the above requirements or fail to rectify such noncompliance within specified time limits.
Regulation
Relating to Value-added Telecommunications Services
On
September 25, 2000, the State Council issued the PRC Regulations on Telecommunications, or the Telecommunications Regulations, as last
amended on February 6, 2016, to regulate telecommunications activities in China. The Telecommunications Regulations divided the telecommunications
services into two categories, namely “infrastructure telecommunications services” and “value-added telecommunications
services.” Pursuant to the Telecommunications Regulations, operators of value-added telecommunications services, or VATS, must
first obtain a Value-added Telecommunications Business Operating License, or VATS License, from the MIIT or its provincial level counterparts.
On July 3, 2017, the MIIT promulgated the Administrative Measures on Telecommunications Business Operating Licenses, which set forth
more specific provisions regarding the types of licenses required to operate VATS, the qualifications and procedures for obtaining such
licenses and the administration and supervision of such licenses.
The
Classified Catalog of Telecommunications Services (2015 Version), or the 2015 MIIT Catalog, effective on March 1, 2016 and as amended
on June 6, 2019, defines information services as “the information services provided for users through public communications networks
or internet by means of information gathering, development, processing and the construction of the information platform.” Moreover,
information services continue to be classified as a category of VATS and are clarified to include information release and delivery services,
information search and query services, information community platform services, information real-time interactive services, and information
protection and processing services under the 2015 MIIT Catalog.
The
Administrative Measures on Internet Information Services, or the ICP Measures, promulgated by the PRC State Council and as last amended
on January 8, 2011, sets forth more specific rules on the provision of internet information services. According to the ICP Measures,
any company that engages in the provision of commercial internet information services must obtain a sub-category VATS License for Internet
Information Services, or the ICP License, from the relevant government authorities before providing any commercial internet information
services within the PRC. Pursuant to the above-mentioned regulations, “commercial internet information services” generally
refer to provision of specific information content, online advertising, web page construction and other online application services through
the internet for profit making purpose. According to the ICP Measures, internet information service providers cannot produce, duplicate,
publish or disseminate information that (i) is against any fundamental principles set out in the Constitution Law of China; (ii) endangers
the national security, leaks the national secrets, incites to overthrow the national power, or undermines the national unity; (iii) damages
the national honor or interests; (iv) incites the ethnic hatred and ethnic discrimination or undermines the solidarity among all ethnic
groups; (v) undermines the national policies on religions and advocates religious cults and feudal superstition; (vi) disseminates rumors
to disrupt the social order and undermines the social stability; (vii) disseminates the obscene materials, advocates gambling, violence,
killing and terrorism, or instigates others to commit crimes; (viii) humiliates or defames others or infringes the legitimate rights
and interests of others; and (ix) is otherwise prohibited by laws and regulations.
In
addition to the Telecommunications Regulations and the other regulations discussed above, the provision of commercial internet information
services on mobile internet apps is regulated by the Administrative Provisions on Mobile Internet Applications Information Services,
which was promulgated by the Cyberspace Administration of China, or the CAC, and last amended on June 14, 2022 which came into effect
on August 1, 2022. The providers of mobile internet applications are subject to requirements under these provisions, including acquiring
the qualifications and complying with other requirements provided by laws and regulations and being responsible for information security.
Regulation
Relating to Private Education
The
Education Law of PRC, or the Education Law, sets forth provisions relating to the fundamental education systems of China, including a
school system of pre-school education, primary education, secondary education and higher education, a system of nine-year compulsory
education and a system of education certificates. The Education Law stipulates that the government formulates plans for the development
of education, establishes and operates schools and other types of educational institutions, and in principle, enterprises, institutions,
social organizations and individuals are encouraged to operate schools and other types of educational organizations in accordance with
PRC laws and regulations.
On
December 28, 2002, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, or the SCNPC, promulgated the Law for Promoting Private
Education, or the Private Education Law, which was last amended on December 29, 2018. Pursuant to the Private Education Law, sponsors
of private schools may choose to establish non-profit or for-profit private schools at their own discretion and the establishment of
the private schools must be subject to approvals granted by relevant government authorities and registered with relevant registration
authorities.
On
April 7, 2021, the State Council promulgated the amended Regulations on the Implementation of the Law for Promoting Private Education
of the PRC, or the Amended Implementation Regulations of Private Education Law, which became effective on September 1, 2021. The Amended
Implementation Regulations of Private Education Law provides that, among others, carrying out online education activities using internet
technology is encouraged by the State and shall be in compliance with internet management related laws and regulations. A private school
engaging in online education activities using internet technology shall obtain relevant private school operating permit. Moreover, a
private school engaging in online education activities using internet technology shall establish and implement internet security management
systems and technical measures for security protection. Upon discovery of any information of which the release or transmission is prohibited
by relevant laws or regulations, the private school shall immediately stop the transmission thereof and take measures such as deletion
so as to prevent the information from spreading. Relevant records shall be kept and reported to the relevant competent authorities.
The
Amended Implementation Rules further stipulates that relevant government authorities shall enhance the supervision on the agreements
entered into between non-profit private schools and its related party and shall review such transaction on an annual basis.
Uncertainties
exist with respect to the interpretation and application of the existing and future laws and regulations governing the online private
education industry, and how the local government will promulgate implementing rules relating to the specific requirements applicable
to online education service providers like us. For potential risks on our business due to the Amended Implementation Regulations of Private
Education Law, see “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors-Risk Factors Related to Our Business and Industry—Our
compliance with the Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education
and the implementation measures issued by the relevant PRC government authorities has materially and adversely affected and may continue
to affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospect.”
Regulation
Relating to After-school Tutoring and Educational Apps
On
February 13, 2018, the MOE, the Ministry of Civil Affairs, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and the SAMR jointly promulgated
the Circular on Alleviating After-school Burden on Primary and Secondary School Students and Implementing Inspections on After-school
Training Institutions, pursuant to which the government authorities will carry out a series of inspections on after-school training institutions
and order those with material potential safety risks to suspend business for self-inspection and rectification and those without proper
establishment licenses or school operating permits to apply for relevant qualifications and certificates under the guidance of competent
government authorities. Moreover, after-school training institutions must file with the local education authorities and publicly present
the classes, courses, target students, class hours and other information relating to their academic training courses (primarily including
courses on Chinese and mathematics). After-school training institutions are prohibited from providing academic training services beyond
the scope or above the level of school textbooks, or organizing any academic competitions (such as Olympiad competitions) or level tests
for students of primary and secondary schools. In addition, primary and secondary schools may not reference the student’s performance
in the after-school training institutions as one of admission criteria.
On
August 6, 2018, the General Office of the State Council issued the Opinion on the Regulation of the Development of After-school Training
Institutions, or State Council Circular 80, which primarily regulates the after-school training institutions targeting students in elementary
and middle schools. State Council Circular 80 reiterates prior guidance that after-school training institutions must obtain a private
school operating permit, and further requires such institutions to meet certain minimum requirements. For example, after-school training
institutions are required to (i) have a training premise that satisfies specific safety criteria, with an average area per student of
no less than three square meters during the applicable training period; (ii) comply with relevant requirements relating to fire safety,
environmental protection, hygiene, food operation and others; (iii) purchase personal safety insurance for their students to reduce safety
risks; and (iv) avoid hiring any teachers who are working concurrently in primary or secondary schools, and ensure that teachers tutoring
in academic subjects (such as Chinese, mathematics, English, physics, chemistry and biology) have the corresponding teacher qualification
licenses. In addition, after-school training institutions are prohibited from carrying out exam- oriented training, training that goes
beyond the school syllabus, training in advance of the corresponding school schedule or any training activities associated with student
admission, and they are not allowed to organize any level test, rank examination or competition on academic subjects for primary and
secondary students. The training content of after-school training institutions cannot exceed the corresponding national curricular standards
and training progress shall not be more accelerated than the corresponding progress of local schools. According to State Council Circular
80, after-school training institutions are also required to disclose and file relevant information regarding the institution, including
their training content, schedule, targeted students and school timetable to the relevant education authority, and their training classes
may not end later than 8:30 p.m. each day or otherwise conflict with the teaching time of local primary and secondary schools. Course
fees can only be collected for courses in three months or shorter installments. Moreover, State Council Circular 80 requests that competent
local authorities formulate relevant local standards for after-school training institutions within their administrative area. If an overseas
listed after-school training institution publicizes overseas any periodical report, or any interim report on material adverse effect
on its operation, it must concurrently publish the information in Chinese on its official website (or on the disclosure platform for
securities exchange information in the absence of an official website). With respect to online education service providers, State Council
Circular 80 provides a principle that regulatory authorities of networking, culture, information technology, radio and television industries
should cooperate with regulatory authorities of education in supervising online education in their relevant industry. On May 6, 2020,
the General Office of the MOE promulgated the Notice on the Negative List of Advanced Trainings for Six Compulsory Education Subjects
(for Trial Implementation), which, in accordance with the State Council Circular 80, prohibits after-school training institutions from
providing advanced trainings that do not follow the formal school curricula to the students in primary school and secondary school, and
further defined activities that will be regarded as advanced training in the subjects of Chinese, mathematics, English, physics, chemistry
and biology.
To
strengthen the prevention and control of myopia among children and teenagers, the MOE, the SAMR, and certain other government authorities
issued the Comprehensive Implementation Plan for Myopia Control in Children and Teenagers in August 2018, which requires, among others,
that the schools (i) shall use electronic devices based on the principal of necessity, shall not rely on electronic devices for teaching
and homework assignment and shall rather assign paper-based homework in principle, and shall limit use of electronic devices to no more
than 30% of total teaching time; and (ii) shall strictly implement the learning and development guidelines for children aged from 3 to
6, pay attention to the importance of child life and play and avoid “primary school” teaching.
On
November 20, 2018, the General Office of the MOE, the General Office of the SAMR and the General Office of the Ministry of Emergency
Management jointly issued the Notice on Improving the Specific Governance and Rectification Mechanisms of After-school Education Institutions,
which provides that provincial regulatory authorities of education should be responsible for being filed with the training institutions
that use internet technology to provide online training and target primary and secondary school students. Provincial regulatory authorities
of education should supervise the online after-school training institutions based on the policies regulating the offline after-school
training institutions. In addition, online after-school training institutions are required to file the information of their courses,
such as names, contents, target students, syllabi and schedules with the relevant provincial regulatory authorities of education and
publish the name, photo, class schedule and certificate number of the teacher qualification license of each teacher on their websites.
On
December 25, 2018, the General Office of the MOE issued the Notice on Strictly Forbidding Harmful Apps in Primary and Secondary Schools,
which stipulates, among other things, that (i) local primary schools, secondary schools and education departments, should conduct comprehensive
investigations on Apps in their campus, and should call off using any Apps containing harmful contents (such as commercial advertisements
and internet games) or increasing the burden to the students, and (ii) a filing and reviewing system of learning Apps should be established.
On
August 10, 2019, the MOE, jointly with certain other PRC government authorities, issued the Opinions on Guiding and Regulating the Orderly
and Healthy Development of Educational Mobile Apps, or the Opinions on Educational Apps, which requires, among others, mobile Apps that
provide services for school teaching and management, student learning and student life, or home-school interactions, with school faculties,
students or parents as the main users and with education or learning as the main application scenarios, are educational Apps, which should
be filed with competent provincial regulatory authorities for education. The Opinions on Educational Apps also requires, among others,
that (i) each provider of educational Apps should obtain the ICP License or complete the ICP filing and obtain the certificate and the
grade evaluation report for graded protection of cybersecurity before the completion of filing; (ii) the educational Apps with main users
under the age of 18 should limit the use time of its App, specify the range of suitable ages, and strictly monitor the content in its
App; (iii) if any educational App will be introduced as a mandatory App to students in any school, such educational App should be approved
by the applicable school through its collective decision-making process and be filed with the competent regulatory authorities for education;
and (iv) the educational Apps selected by regulatory authorities for education and schools as the teaching or management tools are not
allowed to charge any fees to students or parents or offer any commercial advertisements or games. On November 11, 2019, the MOE issued
the Administrative Measures on Filing of Educational Mobile Apps. In 2020, the MOE established a public channel that can be used to submit
complaints with respect to educational apps and set a penalty points system based on the severity of the complaints. For serious complaints
substantiated by relevant government authorities, an appropriate number of penalty points is recorded for the relevant educational app
provider, and remedial measures also may be required. In the event that an educational app provider receives 12 or more penalty points
within 12 months or certain types of serious complaints, the MOE may revoke such provider’s filing, blacklist such provider, remove
its educational app from the app store, publicize the complaint or prohibit such provider from submitting any filings for six months.
Complaints can be made against both educational app providers and users regarding a variety of matters including failure to file or obtain
relevant permits; illegal or inappropriate information; inappropriate collection and use of personal information; and violation of relevant
requirements for primary and secondary schools and online after-school training programs.
On
September 19, 2019, the MOE, jointly with certain other PRC government authorities, issued the Guidance Opinions on Promoting the Healthy
Development of Online Education, which provides, among others, that (i) social forces are encouraged to establish online education institutions,
develop online education resources, and provide high-quality education services; and (ii) an online education negative list shall be
promulgated and industries not included in the negative list are open for all types of entities to enter into.
On
June 10, 2020, the General Office of MOE and the General Office of SAMR promulgated the Notice on Issuing the Form of Service Contract
for After-school Training Provided to Primary and Secondary School Students and amended on September 27, 2021, which requires the local
competent regulatory authorities to guide the relevant parties to use the form of service contract for after-school training activities
provided to primary and secondary school students. The form of service contract covers the obligations and rights of parties involved
in the after-school training, including detailed provisions on training fees, refund arrangement and default liabilities.
On
April 21, 2020, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Welfare and other government authorities jointly promulgated the Notice of
Implementing the Phased Measures of “Taking Certificate after Starting Career” for Certain Occupations under COVID-19, pursuant
to which all college graduates who are eligible for the teacher qualification examination and meet the requirements of teacher qualification
regarding ideological and political criteria, language skills and physical conditions are allowed to start to engage in the related work
of education before obtaining the teacher qualification licenses. The teacher qualification licenses would not be a mandatory precondition
for college graduates if they are hired prior to December 31, 2020.
On
October 13, 2020, the General Office of the MOE and the General Office of the SAMR jointly promulgated the Notice on the Centralized
Rectification of After-school Tutoring Institutions’ Illegal Acts of Infringing Consumers’ Rights by Using Unfair Standard
Terms. The Notice stipulates that local education and market regulation authorities shall increase the efforts for the investigation
of after-school tutoring institutions’ illegal acts which infringes consumers’ rights by using unfair standard terms to exempt
them from their own responsibility, increase consumers’ liability and exclude consumers’ legal rights.
The
Minors Protection Law issued by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on September 4, 1991, was recently amended
on October 17, 2020, which took effect on June 1, 2021. According to the amended Minors Protection Law, kindergartens and after-school
training institutions may not carry out primary school curriculum education for minors that are not yet school age, and online education
products and services which are targeted at minors shall not include any links to online games or push any advertisements and other information
irrelevant to teaching.
The
General Office of the MOE enacted the Notice of Strengthening the Management of Homework for Compulsory Education on April 8, 2021, which
requires that the local governments shall implement prohibition measures on leaving homework as an important part of the daily supervision
on after-school training institutions in accordance with relevant regulations, and in order to avoid reducing the burden in schools but
increasing the burden after-school, after-school training institutions shall not leave homework to primary and secondary school students.
On
July 24, 2021, the General Office of State Council and the General Office of Central Committee of the Communist Party of China jointly
promulgated the Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students in Compulsory Education,
or the Alleviating Burden Opinion, which provides that, among other things, (i) local government authorities shall no longer approve
new after-school tutoring institutions providing tutoring services on academic subjects for students in compulsory education, and the
existing after-school tutoring institutions providing tutoring services on academic subjects shall be registered as non-profit; (ii)
online after-school tutoring institutions that have filed with the local education administration authorities providing tutoring services
on academic subjects shall be subject to review and re-approval procedures by competent government authorities, and any failure to obtain
such approval will result in the cancellation of its previous filing and ICP license; (iii) Academic AST Institutions are prohibited
from raising funds by listing on stock markets or conducting any capitalization activities and listed companies are prohibited from investing
in Academic AST Institutions through capital markets fund raising activities, or acquiring assets of Academic AST Institutions by paying
cash or issuing securities; and (iv) foreign capital is prohibited from controlling or participating in any Academic AST Institutions
through mergers and acquisitions, entrusted operation, joining franchise or variable interest entities. Any violation of the foregoing
shall be rectified.
Moreover,
the Alleviating Burden Opinion specifies a series of operating requirements that after-school tutoring institutions must meet, including,
among other things, (i) after-school tutoring institutions shall not provide tutoring services on academic subjects during national holidays,
weekends and school breaks; (ii) for online tutoring, each session shall be no more than thirty minutes and the training shall end no
later than 9:00 p.m.; (iii) no advertisements for after-school tutoring shall be published or broadcasted in the network platforms and
billboards displayed in the mainstream media, new media, public place and residential areas; (iv) the provision of overseas education
courses is strictly prohibited; (v) fees charged for academic subjects tutoring in compulsory education shall be included into government-guided
price management, and excessive high fees and excessive profit-seeking behaviors will be suppressed; (vi) government authorities will
implement risk management and control for the pre-collection of fees by after-school tutoring institutions with requirements such as
setting up third-party custodians and risk reserves, and strengthen supervision over loans regarding tutoring services; (vii) online
tutoring for preschool-age children is prohibited, and offline academic subjects (including foreign language) tutoring services for preschool-age
children is also strictly prohibited; (viii) no more approval of new after-school tutoring institutions providing tutoring services on
academic subjects for pre-school-age children and students on grade ten to twelve will be granted; and (ix) administration and supervision
over academic subjects tutoring institutions for students on grade ten to twelve shall be implemented by reference to the relevant provisions
of the Alleviating Burden Opinion. On February 8, 2022, the MOE issued the 2022 Work Points of MOE, which specifies that administration
and supervision over academic subjects tutoring institutions for students on grade ten to twelve shall be strictly implemented by reference
to the relevant provisions of the Alleviating Burden Opinion.
On
July 28, 2021, the General Office of MOE promulgated the Notice on Further Clarifying the Scope of Academic Subjects and Non-Academic
Subjects of After-School Tutoring in the Compulsory Education, which specifies that according to the national curriculum on compulsory
education, when after-school institutions carry out tutoring, morality and rule of law, Chinese, history, geography, mathematics, foreign
language (including English, Japanese, Russian), physics, chemistry and biology are classified as academic subjects, while sports (or
sports and health), art (or music, art), and comprehensive practical activities (including information technology education, labor and
technology education) are classified as non-academic subjects.
On
August 25, 2021, the General Office of MOE issued the Administrative Measures for After-School Tutoring Materials for Primary and Secondary
School Students (for Trial Implementation), which provide that, among others, (i) after-school tutoring materials for primary and secondary
school students and staff preparing such tutoring materials shall meet certain requirements specified in such measures, which include,
among others, tutoring materials shall follow the national curriculum standard and shall not provide contents in advance of the school
curriculum; (ii) after-school tutoring institutions shall establish internal management system for the tutoring materials and the staff
preparing such tutoring materials; (iii) after-school tutoring institutions shall conduct internal review of the tutoring materials and
the local education administrations shall conduct external review of the tutoring materials; (iv) after-school tutoring institutions
may only use tutoring materials that have been internally and externally reviewed or if the materials have been officially published;
(v) after school tutoring institutions shall file with the relevant education administrations the tutoring materials and the staff preparing
such materials; (vi) after-school tutoring institutions in violation of the measures will be subject to rectification and shall not use
the relevant tutoring materials during the rectification period; if the after-school tutoring institution refuses to rectify within the
time limit or if the violation is severe, its private school operating permit may be revoked by the local education administration.
On
September 7, 2021, the MOE published on its official website that the MOE, together with two other government authorities, issued a circular
requiring all Academic AST Institutions to complete registration as non-profit by the end of 2021, and all Academic AST Institutions
shall, before completing such registration, suspend enrollment of students and charging fees.
On
September 18, 2021 the MOE further published on its official website that the General Office of MOE, together with five other government
authorities, issued a circular requiring all online after-school tutoring institutions that have filed with the local education administration
authorities providing tutoring services on academic subjects to obtain the private school operating permit by the end of 2021, and all
online after-school tutoring institutions shall, before obtain such permit, suspend enrollment of students and charging fees.
On
September 9, 2021, the General Office of MOE and the General Office of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Welfare jointly issued
the Administrative Measures for Practitioners of the After-School Tutoring Institutions (for Trial Implementation), which set out a series
of requirements for the after-school tutoring institutions with respect to their employed teachers, research staff and teaching assistants.
After-school tutoring institutions in violation of such requirements will be subject to rectification. If an after-school tutoring institution
violates the requirements several times or violates several requirements, such after-school tutoring institution is prohibited from enrollment
of students and shall not conduct tutoring activities during the rectification period; and if the after-school tutoring institution refuses
to rectify within the time limit or if the violation is severe, its private school operating permit may be revoked by the local education
administration.
On
October, 2021, the MOE jointly with certain other PRC government authorities, promulgated the Notice on Strengthening the Supervision
of After-School Tutoring Institutions Pre-collection of Fees, which requires the pre-collection of fees by Academic AST Institution and
non-Academic AST Institution shall be supervised. Local government will adopt bank custodians or risk reserves to control such risk with
the consideration of local situation.
On
March 3, 2022, the MOE jointly with SAMR and NDRC promulgated the Notice on Regulating Non-Academic After-school Training Institutions,
which provide that, among others, (i) non-academic after school tutoring institutions shall have the corresponding qualifications and
their staffs shall have the corresponding proofs for their profession; (ii) non-academic after school tutoring institutions shall ensure
that training contents and training methods are suitable for the age, mental and physical characteristics and cognitive level of students;
(iii) the training contents, training hours, charging items, charging standards and other information of non-academic after school tutoring
institutions shall be made public and subject to public supervision; (iv) non-academic after school tutoring institutions shall use the
form of service contract for after-school training activities provided to primary and secondary school students, strictly performing
contractual obligations and regulating its charging behaviors; (v) non-academic after school tutoring institutions’ unfair competition
by fictitious original prices, false discounts, false publicity, monopolistic behaviors and any form of price fraud are prohibited; (vi)
the pre-collection of fees by non-academic after school tutoring institutions shall be deposited to the special account for fee collection
and tuition fees shall not be collected in a lump sum, or in disguised form of recharging or measured cards for more than 60 classes
or for a course length of more than three months; and (vii) non-academic after school tutoring institutions shall comply with requirements
relating to premise, facilities and fire safety.
On
April 2, 2022, the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, together with five other government authorities promulgated the Implementation
Measures for the Establishment and Management of After-school Training Institutions in Shanghai, or the Shanghai Implementation Measures,
effective from April 15, 2022, which raise certain requirements on establishment and management of after-school tutoring institutions
in Shanghai, including, among other things, (i) after-school tutoring institutions providing online or offline academic subject tutoring
for students in compulsory education and high schools, and the tutoring in culture and art, sports, technology, and non-academic cultural
knowledge for students in compulsory education and preschool-age children are required to obtain the relevant private school operating
permit; (ii) academic and non-academic cultural knowledge after-school tutoring institutions shall be approved by the education administration
authorities at the district level; after-school tutoring institutions that provide tutoring services in culture and art, sports, science
and technology and other tutoring activities shall be approved by the education administration authorities together with the tourism,
sports, science and technology and other administrative authorities at the district level; (iii) after school tutoring institutions shall
use the form of service contract for after-school training activities provided to primary and secondary school students, implement the
training fee management policy formulated by the government, and cooperate with professional institutions such as commercial banks to
open a special account for pre-collection of fees; and (iv) after-school training institutions established before the Shanghai Implementation
Measures, intending to continue to provide tutoring in culture and art, sports, science and technology, and non-academic cultural knowledge
for compulsory education and preschool-age children, shall, before December 31, 2023 or before changing the relevant registration items,
follow the relevant laws, regulations, policies and the procedures to obtain the private school operating permit. On the same day, the
Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, together with three other government authorities promulgated the Guidelines for Basic Service
Requirements of After-school Training Institutions in Shanghai, effective from April 15, 2022, which details the basic service requirements
for after-school tutoring institutions in Shanghai, including, among other things, the requirements on the sponsors, premises, facilities,
internal management, practitioners, training content and plans, fee management etc. and provides that institutions providing online tutoring
should follow the PRC Cybersecurity Law and the Data Security Law, obtain the ICP License or complete the ICP filing and complete the
grade-based cybersecurity protection system filing at or above Grade III.
On
December 8, 2022, the MOE together with twelve other government authorities issued the Opinions on Standardizing Non-Academic After-School
Tutoring for Primary and Secondary School Students, which reiterates that local authorities shall identify corresponding competent authorities
for different tutoring categories and shall set forth basic standards for establishment and approval procedures for online and offline
tutoring institutions of the corresponding categories based on local conditions. In addition, the Opinions provide that local authorities
shall standardize daily operations and strengthen daily supervision of non-academic after-school tutoring, including: (1) in terms of
training content and training time, non-academic tutoring institutions shall not provide academic tutoring courses, and the training
time shall not conflict with the teaching time of local primary and secondary schools; the offline training shall end no later than 20:30,
and the online training shall end no later than 21:00; (2) in terms of price, non-academic tutoring institutions shall follow the principles
of fairness, legality and good faith, set prices according to training costs, market supply and demand, etc.; and such prices shall be
reported to the competent authorities and be made to the public; (3) in terms of pre-collection of fees, all fees collected by the tutoring
institution shall be put into the special account, and the training fees shall not be paid by training loans. The pre-collected fees
shall be included into supervision and shall not be collected for more than 60 classes, for a course length of more than three months
or over RMB5,000 in one time or in the form of recharge, card and other disguised charges; (4) all non-academic tutoring institutions
shall be included in the unified management through the National Platform for Supervision and Service of After-School Education and Training.
Our
current practice may be deemed to be not in full compliance with the above laws and regulations and we cannot assure you that we will
comply with the above laws and regulations in a timely manner or at all. For detailed discussion, please see “Item 3. Key Information—3.D.
Risk Factors—Our compliance with the Opinions on Further Alleviating the Burden of Homework and After-School Tutoring for Students
in Compulsory Education and the implementation measures issued by the relevant PRC government authorities has materially and adversely
affected and may continue to affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospect.”
Regulation
Relating to Online Transmission of Audio-Visual Programs
To
regulate the provision of audio-visual program services to the public via the internet, including through mobile networks, within the
territory of the PRC, the State Administration of Press Publication Radio Film and Television, or the SAPPRFT (currently known as National
Radio and Television Administration), and the MIIT jointly promulgated the Administrative Provisions on Internet Audio-Visual Program
Service, or the Audio-Visual Program Provisions, on December 20, 2007, which was last amended on August 28, 2015. Under the Audio-Visual
Program Provisions, “internet audio-visual program services” is defined as activities of producing, redacting and integrating
audio-visual programs, providing them to the general public via the internet, and providing service for other people to upload and transmit
audio-visual programs, and providers of internet audio- visual program services are required to obtain a License for Online Transmission
of Audio-Visual Programs issued by the SAPPRFT, or complete certain registration procedures with the SAPPRFT. In general, providers of
internet audio-visual program services must be either state-owned or state-controlled entities, and the business to be carried out by
such providers must satisfy the overall planning and guidance catalog for internet audio-visual program service determined by the SAPPRFT.
On March 10, 2017, the SAPPRFT issued the Provisional
Implementation of the Tentative Categories of Internet Audio-Visual Program Services, or the Categories, which revised the previous version
issued on March 17, 2010. According to the Categories, there are four categories of internet audio and video programs services which are
further divided into seventeen sub-categories. The third sub-category to the second category covers the making and editing of certain
specialized audio-visual programs concerning, among other things, educational content, and broadcasting such content to the general public
online.
Regulation Relating to Internet Live Streaming Services
On November 4, 2016, the CAC issued the Administrative
Regulation on Internet Live Streaming Services, effective from December 1, 2016, according to which, “internet live streaming”
is defined as the activities of continuously releasing real-time information to the public based on the internet in forms such as videos,
audios, images and texts, and “internet live-streaming service providers” are defined as the operators that provide internet
live-streaming platform service. In addition, the internet live-streaming service providers should take various measures during operation
of their services, such as examining and verifying the authenticity of the identification information, and file such information for records.
On July 12, 2017, the CAC issued a Notice on Development
of the Filing Work for Enterprises Providing Internet Live Streaming Services, which provides that all the companies providing internet
live streaming services should file with the local authority since July 15, 2017, otherwise the CAC or its local counterparts may impose
administrative sanctions on such companies.
Pursuant to the Circular on Tightening the Administration
of Internet Live Streaming Services jointly issued by the MIIT, the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, or the MOCT, and several other government
agencies on August 1, 2018, the live streaming services providers are required to file with the local public security authority within
30 days after they commence the service online.
Regulation Relating to Production and Distribution of Radio and
Television Programs
The Administrative Measures on the Production
and Operation of Radio and Television Programs, or the Radio and TV Programs Measures, promulgated by the SAPPRFT are applicable for establishing
institutions that produce and distribute radio and television programs or for the production of radio and television programs like programs
with a special topic, column programs, variety shows, animated cartoons, radio plays and television dramas and for activities like transactions
and agency transactions of program copyrights. Pursuant to the Radio and TV Programs Measures, any entity that intends to produce or operate
radio or television programs must first obtain the Permit for Production and Operation of Radio and TV Programs from the SAPPRFT or its
local branches.
Regulation Relating to Internet Culture Activities
The Interim Administrative Provisions on Internet
Culture, or the Internet Culture Provisions, which was promulgated by the Ministry of Culture, or MOC (currently known as the MOCT), on
February 17, 2011 and last amended on December 15, 2017, requires internet information services providers engaging in commercial “internet
culture activities” to obtain an internet culture business operating license from the MOC. “Internet cultural activity”
is defined under the Internet Culture Provisions as an act of provision of internet cultural products and related services, which includes
(i) the production, duplication, importation, and broadcasting of the internet cultural products; (ii) the online dissemination whereby
cultural products are posted on the internet or transmitted via the internet to end-users, such as computers, fixed-line telephones, mobile
phones, television sets and games machines, for online users’ browsing, use or downloading; and (iii) the exhibition and competition
of the internet cultural products. In addition, “internet cultural products” is defined under the Internet Culture Provisions
as cultural products produced, broadcast and disseminated via the internet, which mainly include internet cultural products especially
produced for the internet, such as online music entertainment, online games, online shows and plays (programs), online performances, online
works of art and online cartoons, and internet cultural products produced from cultural products such as music entertainment, games, shows
and plays (programs), performances, works of art, and cartoons through certain techniques and duplicating those to internet for dissemination.
On May 14, 2019, the General Office of MOCT promulgated
the Notice on Adjusting the Scope of Internet Culture Business Operating License and Further Standardize the Approval Work, which provides
that online music, online shows and plays, online performances, online works of art, online cartoons, displays and games are the activities
that fall in the scope of internet culture business operating license, and further clarifies that educational live streaming activities
are not deemed as online performances.
Regulation Relating to Online Publishing
On February 4, 2016, the State Administration
of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television, or the SAPPRFT (currently reformed into the State Administration of Press and Publication
(National Copyright Bureau) under the Propaganda Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China) and the MIIT jointly
issued the Administrative Provisions on Online Publishing Services, or the Online Publishing Provisions, which came into effect on March
10, 2016. Under the Online Publishing Provisions, any entity providing online publishing services shall obtain an Online Publishing Services
Permit. “Online publishing services” refer to the provision of online publications to the public through information networks;
and “online publications” refer to digital works with publishing features such as having been edited, produced or processed
and are available to the public through information networks, including: (i) written works, pictures, maps, games, cartoons, audio/video
reading materials and other original digital works containing useful knowledge or ideas in the field of literature, art, science or other
fields; (ii) digital works of which the content is identical to that of any published book, newspaper, periodical, audio/video product,
electronic publication or the like; (iii) network literature databases or other digital works, derived from any of the aforesaid works
by selection, arrangement, collection or other means; and (iv) other types of digital works as may be determined by the SAPPRFT.
Regulation Relating to Internet Information Security and Privacy
Protection
The PRC Constitution states that the PRC laws
protect the freedom and privacy of communications of citizens and prohibit infringement of such rights. PRC governmental authorities have
enacted laws and regulations on internet information security and protection of personal information from any abuse or unauthorized disclosure.
The Decisions on Maintaining Internet Security which was enacted by the SCNPC on December 28, 2000 and amended on August 27, 2009, may
subject violators to criminal punishment in the PRC for any effort to: (i) gain improper entry into a computer or system of strategic
importance; (ii) disseminate politically disruptive information; (iii) leak state secrets; (iv) spread false commercial information; or
(v) infringe intellectual property rights. The Ministry of Public Security, or MPS, has promulgated measures that prohibit use of the
internet in ways which, among other things, result in a leakage of state secrets or a spread of socially destabilizing content. If an
information service provider violates these measures, the MPS and the local security bureaus may revoke its operating license and shut
down its websites.
Pursuant to the Decision on Strengthening the
Protection of Online Information issued by the SCNPC on December 28, 2012, and the Order for the Protection of Telecommunication and Internet
User Personal Information issued by the MIIT on July 16, 2013, any collection and use of user personal information must be subject to
the consent of the user, abide by the principles of legality, rationality and necessity and be within the specified purposes, methods
and scopes. “Personal information” is defined as information that identifies a citizen, the time or location for his/her use
of telecommunication and internet services or involves privacy of any citizen such as his/her birth date, ID card number, and address.
An internet information service provider must also keep information collected strictly confidential, and is further prohibited from divulging,
tampering or destroying of any such information, or selling or providing such information to other parties. Any violation of the above
decision or order may subject the internet information service provider to warnings, fines, confiscation of illegal gains, revocation
of licenses, cancelation of filings, closedown of websites or even criminal liabilities.
Pursuant to the Notice of the Supreme People’s
Court, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and the MPS on Legally Punishing Criminal Activities Infringing upon the Personal Information
of Citizens, issued on April 23, 2013, and the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate
on Several Issues regarding Legal Application in Criminal Cases Infringing upon the Personal Information of Citizens, which was issued
on May 8, 2017 and took effect on June 1, 2017, the following activities may constitute the crime of infringing upon a citizen’s
personal information: (i) providing a citizen’s personal information to specified persons or releasing a citizen’s personal
information online or through other methods in violation of relevant national provisions; (ii) providing legitimately collected information
relating to a citizen to others without such citizen’s consent (unless the information is processed, not traceable to a specific
person and not recoverable); (iii) collecting a citizen’s personal information in violation of applicable rules and regulations
when performing a duty or providing services; or (iv) collecting a citizen’s personal information by purchasing, accepting or exchanging
such information in violation of applicable rules and regulations.
Pursuant to the Ninth Amendment to the Criminal
Law issued by the SCNPC on August 29, 2015, which became effective on November 1, 2015, any person or entity that fails to fulfill the
obligations related to internet information security administration as required by applicable laws and refuses to rectify upon orders
is subject to criminal penalty for the result of (i) any dissemination of illegal information in large scale; (ii) any severe effect due
to the leakage of the client’s information; (iii) any serious loss of criminal evidence; or (iv) other severe situation, and any
individual or entity that (x) sells or provides personal information to others in a way violating the applicable law, or (y) steals or
illegally obtain any personal information is subject to criminal penalty in severe situation.
Pursuant to the PRC Cybersecurity Law issued by
the SCNPC on November 7, 2016, effective as of June 1, 2017, “personal information” refers to all kinds of information recorded
by electronic or otherwise that can be used to independently identify or be combined with other information to identify individuals’
personal information, including but not limited to: individuals’ names, dates of birth, ID numbers, biologically identified personal
information, addresses and telephone numbers, etc. The PRC Cybersecurity Law also provides that: (i) to collect and use personal information,
network operators shall follow the principles of legitimacy, rightfulness and necessity, disclose rules of data collection and use, clearly
express the purposes, means and scope of collecting and using the information, and obtain the consent of the persons whose data is gathered;(ii)
network operators shall neither gather personal information unrelated to the services they provide, nor gather or use personal information
in violation of the provisions of laws and administrative regulations or the scopes of consent given by the persons whose data is gathered;
and shall dispose of personal information they have saved in accordance with the provisions of laws and administrative regulations and
agreements reached with users; and (iii) network operators shall not divulge, tamper with or damage the personal information they have
collected, and shall not provide the personal information to others without the consent of the persons whose data is collected. However,
if the information has been processed and cannot be recovered and thus it is impossible to match such information with specific persons,
such circumstance is an exception.
Pursuant to the Provisions on Internet Security
Supervision and Inspection by Public Security Organs, which was promulgated by the MPS on September 15, 2018 and became effective on November
1, 2018, the public security departments are authorized to carry out internet security supervision and inspection of the internet service
providers from the following aspects, among others: (i) whether the service providers have completed the recordation formalities for online
entities, and filed the basic information on and the changes of the accessing entities and users; (ii) whether they have established and
implemented the cybersecurity management system and protocols, and appointed the persons responsible for cybersecurity; (iii) whether
the technical measures for recording and retaining users’ registration information and weblog data are in place according to the
law; (iv) whether they have taken technical measures to prevent computer viruses, network attacks and network intrusion; (v) whether they
have adopted preventive measures to tackle the information that is prohibited to be issued or transmitted by the laws and administrative
regulations in the public information services; (vi) whether they provide technical support and assistance as required by laws to public
security departments to safeguard national security and prevent and investigate on terrorist activities and criminal activities; and (vii)
whether they have fulfilled the obligations of the grade-based cybersecurity protection and other obligations prescribed by the laws and
administrative regulations. In particular, public security departments shall also carry out supervision and inspection on whether an internet
service provider has taken required measures to manage information published by users, adopted proper measures to handle the published
or transmitted information that is prohibited to be published or transmitted, and kept the relevant records.
In addition, the Office of the Central Cyberspace
Affairs Commission, the MIIT, the MPS, and the SAMR jointly issued an Announcement of Launching Special Crackdown Against Illegal Collection
and Use of Personal Information by Apps on January 23, 2019 to implement special rectification works against mobile Apps that collect
and use personal information in violation of applicable laws and regulations, where business operators are prohibited from collecting
personal information irrelevant to their services, or forcing users to give authorization in a disguised manner. On November 28, 2019,
the National Internet Information Office, the MIIT, the MPS and the SAMR further jointly issued a notice to classify and identify illegal
collection and use of personal information.
On August 22, 2019, the Office of the Central
Cyberspace Affairs Commission issued the Provisions on the Cyber Protection of Children’s Personal Information, which took effect
on October 1, 2019. The Provisions on the Cyber Protection of Children’s Personal Information apply to the collection, storage,
use, transfer and disclosure of the personal information of children under the age of 14 via the internet. The Provisions on the Cyber
Protection of Children’s Personal Information require that network operators shall establish special rules and user agreements for
protection of personal information for children under the age of 14, inform their guardians in a noticeable and clear manner, and shall
obtain the consent of their guardians. When obtaining the consent of their guardians, network operators shall explicitly disclose several
matters, including, without limitation, the purpose, method and scope of collection, storage, use, transfer and disclosure of such personal
information, and methods for correcting and deleting such personal information. Provisions on the Cyber Protection of Children’s
Personal Information also require that when collecting, storing, using, transferring and disclosing such personal information, network
operators shall comply with certain regulatory requirements, including, without limitation, that network operators shall designate specific
personnel to take charge of the protection of such personal information and shall strictly grant information access authorization for
their staff to such personal information under the principle of minimal authorization.
Pursuant to the Notice on Promulgation of the
Rules on the Scope of Necessary Personal Information for Common Types of Mobile Internet Applications, which was promulgated by the CAC,
the MIIT and certain other government authorities on March 12, 2021 and became effective on May 1, 2021, “necessary personal information”
refers to the personal information necessary for ensuring the normal operation of an app’s basic functional services, without which
the app cannot achieve its basic functional services. For learning and education app, the basic functional services include, among others,
“online tutoring and online classes” and the necessary personal information is mobile phone numbers of registered users.
According to the PRC Civil Code which became effective
on January 1, 2021, a natural person has the right of privacy and the personal information of a natural person will be protected in accordance
with law. Information processors may not divulge or tamper with the personal information collected or stored by them and may not illegally
provide any natural person’s personal information to others without the consent of such natural person.
The SAMR promulgated the Measures for the Supervision
and Administration of Online Transactions, which took effect from May 1, 2021. The measures require that online transaction operators
shall not force customers, whether or not in a disguised manner, to consent to the collection and use of information not directly related
to their business activities by means of one-off general authorization, default authorization, bundling with other authorizations, or
the suspension of installation and use. Otherwise, such online transaction operator may be subject to fines and consequences under related
laws and regulations, including without limitation suspension of business for rectification and revocation of permits and licenses.
On June 10, 2021, the SCNPC promulgated the Data
Security Law of the PRC, which came into effect on September 1, 2021. The Data Security Law provides for data security and privacy obligations
on entities and individuals carrying out data activities. The Data Security Law also introduces a data classification and hierarchical
protection system based on the importance of data in economic and social development, as well as the degree of harm it will cause to national
security, public interests, or legitimate rights and interests of individuals or organizations when such data is tampered with, destroyed,
leaked, or illegally acquired or used. The appropriate level of protection measures is required to be taken for each respective category
of data. For example, a processor of important data shall designate the personnel and the management body responsible for data security,
carry out risk assessments for its data processing activities and file the risk assessment reports with the competent authorities. In
addition, the Data Security Law provides a national security review procedure for those data activities which may affect national security
and imposes export restrictions on certain data and information. No entity or individual within the territory of the PRC may provide foreign
judicial or law enforcement authorities with the data stored within the territory of the PRC without the approval of the competent PRC
authorities.
On August 20, 2021, the SCNPC promulgated the
Personal Information Protection Law, which became effective on November 1, 2021. The Personal Information Protection Law aims at protecting
the personal information rights and interests, regulating the processing of personal information, ensuring the orderly and free flow of
personal information in accordance with the law, and promoting the reasonable use of personal information, personal information refers
to any recorded information related to identified or identifiable natural persons, though it excludes anonymized information.
The Personal Information Protection Law also specified
the rules for handling sensitive personal information, which includes biometrics, religious beliefs, specific identities, medical health,
financial accounts, trails and locations, and personal information of teenagers under fourteen years old and other personal information,
which, upon leakage or illegal usage, may easily infringe the personal dignity or harm of safety of livelihood and property. Personal
information handlers shall bear responsibility for their personal information handling activities, and adopt necessary measures to safeguard
the security of the personal information they handle. Otherwise, the personal information handlers will be ordered for rectification or
suspension or termination of provision of services, confiscation of illegal income, subject to fines or other penalties. According to
the Personal Information Protection Law.
On January 4, 2022, the CAC published the Revised
Cybersecurity Review Measures, which took effect on February 15, 2022 and repeal the Cybersecurity Review Measures promulgated on April
13, 2020. The Revised Cybersecurity Review Measures provide that a critical information infrastructure operator purchasing network products
and services, and platform operators carrying out data processing activities, which affect or may affect national security, shall apply
for cybersecurity review and that a platform operator with more than one million users’ personal information aiming to list abroad
must apply for cybersecurity review.
On July 30, 2021, the State Council promulgated
the Regulations on Critical Information Infrastructure Security Protection, which went into effect on September 1, 2021. The regulations
provide that, among others, critical information infrastructure, or the CIIO, means important network facilities and information systems
in important industries such as public communications and information services, energy, transportation, water conservancy, finance, public
services, e-government, defense technology industry and others that may seriously harm national security, national economy, people’s
livelihood and public interests once damaged, disabled or its data disclosed. Operators shall, based on leveled system for cybersecurity
protection, adopt technical protection measures and other necessary measures to deal with cybersecurity security events, defend against
cyber-attack and criminal activities, to ensure the safe and stable operation of CIIO, maintain data integrity, confidentiality, and availability
pursuant to relevant laws, regulations and the mandatory requirements of national standards. Moreover, the competent supervisory departments
of relevant important industries abovementioned shall organize the recognition of the CIIO and promptly notify the operators and Public
Security Department of The State Council of the results of the identification.
On July 6, 2021, General Office of the State Council
of the PRC together with another authority jointly promulgated the Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down on Illegal Securities Activities,
or the Securities Activities Opinions, which called for the enhanced administration and supervision of overseas-listed China-based companies,
proposed to revise the relevant regulation governing the overseas issuance and listing of shares by such companies and clarified the responsibilities
of competent domestic industry regulators and government authorities. The Securities Activities Opinions also call for improving laws
and regulations on data security, cross-border data flow and management of confidential information.
On January 4, 2022, the CAC published the Administrative
Provisions on Internet Information Service Algorithm Recommendation on its website, or the Algorithm Recommendation Provisions, which
became effective on March 1, 2022 and raise certain new compliance requirements on internet information service providers using algorithm
recommendation technology. Specifically, the Algorithm Recommendation Provisions require that such service providers shall provide users
with options that are not specific to their personal characteristics, or provide users with convenient options to cancel algorithmic recommendation
services.
On July 7, 2022, the CAC promulgated the Security
Assessment Measures for Outbound Data Transfer, or the Outbound Data Transfer Measures, which became effective on September 1, 2022. The
Outbound Data Transfer Measures provide that a data processor providing data abroad in the following situations shall report security
assessment for its outbound data transfer to the CAC: (i) a data processor provides important data abroad; (ii) a critical information
infrastructure operator or a data processor processing the personal information of more than one million individuals provides personal
information abroad; (iii) a data processor, who has cumulatively provided personal information of 100,000 individuals or sensitive personal
information of 10,000 individuals abroad since January 1 of the previous year, provides personal information abroad; and (iv) other circumstances
prescribed by the CAC for which report for security assessment for outbound data transfers is required. According to the Guidelines on
Security Assessment Report for Outbound Data Transfer promulgated by the CAC, outbound data transfer means (i) a data processor transfers
or stores the data collected or generated during its operation within the PRC abroad, (ii) data collected and generated by a data processor
is stored within the PRC while offshore institutions or individuals are able to inquire, retrieve, download and obtain such data; and
(iii) other outbound data transfer activities prescribed by the CAC.
The CAC amended the Mobile Application Administrative
Provisions in June 2022, which became effective from August 1, 2022, and emphasized that mobile internet applications providers shall
comply with relevant provisions on the scope of necessary personal information when engaging in personal information processing activities.
Such application providers shall not compel the user to agree to the processing of personal information for any reason, and shall not
refuse the user to use its basic functions and services because the user does not agree to provide unnecessary personal information.
On June 27, 2022, the CAC promulgated the Administrative
Provisions on the Account Information of Internet Users, effective from August 1, 2022, or the Account Information Provisions, which applies
to the registration, use, and management of internet users’ account information by internet information service providers. The Account
Information Provisions also requires that the internet information service providers shall protect and process internet users’ account
information in accordance with law, and take measures to prevent unauthorized access and leakage, tampering, and loss of personal information.
The internet information service providers shall set up convenient complaints and reporting portals in prominent locations, publicize
complaints and reporting methods, improve mechanisms for acceptance, screening, disposal, and feedback, clarify processing procedures
and time limits for feedback, and promptly handle complaints and reports from users and the public.
Regulation Relating to Publishing
The Administrative Regulations on Publication,
promulgated by the State Council and most recently amended on November 29, 2020, applies to publication activities, i.e., the publishing,
printing, copying, importation or distribution of publications, including newspapers, periodicals, books, audio and video products and
electronic publications. According to the Administrative Regulations on Publication, any entity engaging in the activities of publishing,
printing, copying, importation or distribution of publications, shall obtain relevant permits of publishing, printing, copying, importation
or distribution of publications.
Under the Administrative Provisions on the Publications
Market, which was jointly promulgated by the SAPPRFT and the MOFCOM on May 31, 2016 and became effective on June 1, 2016, any enterprise
or individual who engages in publishing activities shall obtain a publishing license from SAPPRFT or its local counterpart. Without licensing,
such entity or individual may be ordered to cease illegal acts by the competent administrative department of publication and be concurrently
subject to fines.
Regulation Relating to Advertising, Promotion and Pricing
The principal regulations governing advertising
businesses in China are the PRC Advertising Law as last amended on April 29, 2021 and the Advertising Administrative Regulations issued
on October 26, 1987. These laws, rules and regulations require companies that engage in advertising activities to obtain a business license
that explicitly includes advertising in the business scope from the SAMR or its local branches.
Applicable PRC advertising laws, rules and regulations
contain certain prohibitions on the content of advertisements in China (including prohibitions on misleading content, superlative wording,
socially destabilizing content or content involving obscenities, superstition, violence, discrimination or infringement of the public
interest). Education and/or training advertisements shall not contain the following contents: (i) explicit or implicit guarantee for successful
enrolment to a higher grade, passing of examination, obtaining of degree qualification or passing certificate, or the effect of education
or training; (ii) explicit or implicit expression of participation by the relevant examination body or its personnel, personnel setting
examination questions in the education or training; and recommendation and/or endorsement by scientific research institutes, academic
institutions, educational organizations, industry associations, professionals or beneficiaries using their name or image. Advertisers,
advertising operators and advertising distributors are required by applicable PRC advertising laws, rules and regulations to ensure that
the content of the advertisements they prepare or distribute is true and in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. Violation
of these laws, rules and regulations may result in penalties, including fines, confiscation of advertising income, orders to cease dissemination
of the advertisements and orders to publish an advertisement correcting the misleading information. In circumstances involving serious
violations, the SAMR or its local branches may revoke the violator’s license or permit for advertising business operations. In addition,
advertisers, advertising operators or advertising distributors may be subject to civil liability if they infringe the legal rights and
interests of third parties, such as infringement of intellectual proprietary rights, unauthorized use of a name or portrait and defamation.
The Alleviating Burden Opinion requires that no
advertisements for after-school tutoring shall be published or broadcasted in the network platforms and billboards displayed in the mainstream
media, new media, public place and residential areas. Further, the SAMR jointly with other government authorities promulgated the Notice
on the Control of Advertisements for After-school Tutoring on November 3, 2021 which specifies such requirements under the Alleviating
Burden Opinion applies to advertisements for both academic and non-academic tutoring, and relevant local authorities shall implement measures
to achieve such requirements.
The PRC Pricing Law is promulgated by the SCNPC
on December 29, 1997 and became effective on May 1, 1998. Pursuant to the PRC Pricing Law, an operator is prohibited from using false
or misleading pricing methods to induce consumers or other operators to enter into transactions with it. Otherwise, such operator may
be subject to penalties, including orders to make correction, confiscation of illegal income, fines, orders to cease operation for rectification
or revocation of the business licenses.
In addition, the Anti-Unfair Competition Law promulgated
by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, last amended on April 23, 2019 require that business operators shall
not make false or misleading commercial promotion for the performance, functions, quality, sales, user evaluation, accolades etc. as to
defraud or mislead customers.
Regulation Relating to Intellectual Property Rights
Copyright and Software Registration
The SCNPC promulgated the PRC Copyright Law in
1990 and last revised it on November 11, 2020, effective on June 1, 2021. The amended Copyright Law extends copyright protection to internet
activities, products disseminated over the internet software products, audio-visual works and any other intellectual achievements which
comply with the characteristics of the works. In addition, there is a voluntary registration system administered by the China Copyright
Protection Center. To address the problem of copyright infringement related to the content posted or transmitted over the internet, the
National Copyright Administration, or the NCAC, and the MIIT jointly promulgated the Measures for Administrative Protection of Copyright
Related to Internet on April 29, 2005, which became effective on May 30, 2005.
On December 20, 2001, the State Council promulgated
the Computer Software Protection Regulations which came into effect on January 1, 2002 and was last amended on January 30, 2013. These
regulations are formulated for protecting the rights and interests of computer software copyright owners, encouraging the development
and application of computer software and promoting the development of software business. In order to further implement the Computer Software
Protection Regulations, the NCAC issued the Computer Software Copyright Registration Procedures on February 20, 2002, as amended on May
19, 2004, which applies to software copyright registration, license contract registration and transfer contract registration.
Patents
The SCNPC adopted the Patent Law of the PRC in
1984 and last amended it on October 17, 2020, effective on June 1, 2021. A patentable invention, utility model or design must meet three
conditions, namely novelty, inventiveness and practical applicability. Patents cannot be granted for scientific discoveries, rules and
methods for intellectual activities, methods used to diagnose or treat diseases, animal and plant varieties or methods of nuclear transformation
and substances obtained by means of nuclear transformation. The Patent Office under the National Intellectual Property Administration
is responsible for receiving, examining and approving patent applications. A patent is valid for a twenty-year term for an invention,
a ten-year term for a utility model and a fifteen-year term for a design, all starting from the application date. Except under certain
specific circumstances provided by law, any third-party user must obtain consent or a proper license from the patent owner to use the
patent, otherwise the use will constitute an infringement of the rights of the patent holder.
Trademark
Trademarks are protected by the PRC Trademark
Law, which was adopted in 1982, last revised in April 2019 and became effective in November 2019, as well as its implementation rules
adopted in 2002 and revised in 2014. The Trademark Office of National Intellectual Property Administration under the SAMR handles trademark
registrations and grants a protection term of ten years to registered trademarks which may be renewed for consecutive ten-year periods
upon request by the trademark owner. The PRC Trademark Law has adopted a “first-to-file” principle with respect to trademark
registration. Where a trademark for which a registration has been made is identical or similar to another trademark which has already
been registered or been subject to a preliminary examination and approval for use on the same kind of or similar commodities or services,
the application for registration of such trademark may be rejected. Any person applying for the registration of a trademark may not prejudice
the existing right first obtained by others, nor may any person register in advance a trademark that has already been used by another
party and has already gained a “sufficient degree of reputation” through such party’s use. An application for registration
of a malicious trademark not for use will be rejected and those who apply for trademark registration maliciously will be given administrative
penalties of warnings or fines according to the circumstances; those who file trademark lawsuits maliciously will be punished by the people’s
court according to applicable laws.
Domain Name
The Administrative Measures on Internet Domain
Names, or the Domain Name Measures, were promulgated by the MIIT on August 24, 2017, and came into effect on November 1, 2017. According
to the Domain Name Measures, any party that has domain name root servers, and the institution for operating domain name root servers,
the domain name registry and the domain name registrar within the territory of China, shall obtain a permit for this purpose from the
MIIT or the communications administration of the local province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the Central Government.
The registration of domain names is generally on a “first-apply-first-registration” basis and a domain name applicant will
become the domain name holder upon the completion of the application procedure.
On May 28, 2020, the National People’s Congress
approved the Civil Code of PRC, which took effect on January 1, 2021. Under the Civil Code, if an offender intentionally infringes upon
the intellectual property rights of others and the circumstance is severe, the infringed party shall have the right to request for the
corresponding punitive compensation.
Regulation Relating to Employment, Social Insurance
and Housing Fund
Employment
Pursuant to the PRC Labor Law effective from January 1, 1995 and last
amended on December 29, 2018 and the PRC Labor Contract Law effective from January 1, 2008 and amended on December 28, 2012, a written
labor contract shall be executed by an employer and an employee when the employment relationship is established, and an employer is under
an obligation to sign an unlimited-term labor contract with any employee who has worked for the employer for ten consecutive years. Furthermore,
if an employee requests or agrees to renew a fixed-term labor contract that has already been entered into twice consecutively, the resulting
contract must have an unlimited term, with certain exceptions. All employers must compensate their employees equal to at least the local
minimum wage standards. All employers are required to establish a system for labor safety and sanitation, strictly abide by state rules
and standards and provide employees with appropriate workplace safety training. In addition, the PRC government has continued to introduce
various new labor-related regulations after the PRC Labor Contract Law. Amongst other things, new annual leave requirements mandate that
annual leave ranging from 5 to 15 days is available to nearly all employees and further require that the employer compensate an employee
for any annual leave days the employee is unable to take in the amount of three times his daily salary, subject to certain exceptions.
Moreover, all PRC enterprises are generally required to implement a standard working time system of eight hours a day and forty hours
a week, and if the implementation of such standard working time system is not appropriate due to the nature of the job or the characteristics
of business operation, the enterprise may implement a flexible working time system or comprehensive working time system after obtaining
approvals from the relevant authorities.
Social Insurance
The Law on Social Insurance of the PRC, which
was promulgated on October 28, 2010 and amended on December 29, 2018, has established social insurance systems of basic pension insurance,
unemployment insurance, maternity insurance, work injury insurance and basic medical insurance, and has elaborated in detail the legal
obligations and liabilities of employers who do not comply with relevant laws and regulations on social insurance.
According to the Interim Regulations on the Collection
and Payment of Social Insurance Premiums, the Regulations on Work Injury Insurance, the Regulations on Unemployment Insurance and the
Trial Measures on Employee Maternity Insurance of Enterprises, enterprises in the PRC shall provide benefit plans for their employees,
which include basic pension insurance, unemployment insurance, maternity insurance, work injury insurance and basic medical insurance.
An enterprise must provide social insurance by going through social insurance registration with local social insurance authorities or
agencies, and shall pay or withhold relevant social insurance premiums for or on behalf of employees. On July 20, 2018, the General Office
of the State Council issued the Plan for Reforming the State and Local Tax Collection and Administration Systems, which stipulated that
the State Administration of Taxation, or the SAT, will become solely responsible for collecting social insurance premiums.
Housing Fund
According to the Administrative Regulations on
the Administration of Housing Fund, which was promulgated on April 3, 1999 and last amended on March 24, 2019, housing fund paid and deposited
both by employee themselves and their unit employer shall be owned by the employees. An employer should undertake registration of payment
and deposit of the housing fund in the housing fund management center and open a housing fund account on behalf of its employees in a
commissioned bank. Employers should timely pay and deposit housing fund contributions in full amount and late or insufficient payments
shall be prohibited.
Regulation Relating to Foreign Exchange
Regulation on Foreign Currency Exchange
The principal regulations governing foreign currency
exchange in China are the PRC Foreign Exchange Administration Regulations, or the Foreign Exchange Administration Regulations, which were
promulgated by the State Council on January 29, 1996 and last amended on August 5, 2008. Under the Foreign Exchange Administration Regulations,
Renminbi is generally freely convertible for payments of current account items, such as trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions
and dividend payments, but not freely convertible for capital account items, such as direct investment, loan or investment in securities
outside China, unless prior approval of SAFE or its local counterparts has been obtained.
On February 13, 2015, SAFE promulgated the Notice
on Further Simplifying and Improving Policies for the Foreign Exchange Administration of Direct Investment, or SAFE Notice 13. After SAFE
Notice 13 became effective on June 1, 2015, instead of applying for approvals regarding foreign exchange registrations of foreign direct
investment and overseas direct investment from SAFE, entities and individuals may apply for such foreign exchange registrations from qualified
banks. The qualified banks, under the supervision of SAFE, may directly review the applications and conduct the registration.
On March 30, 2015, SAFE promulgated the Notice
of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming the Administration of Foreign Exchange Settlement of Capital of Foreign-invested
Enterprises, or SAFE Circular 19, which became effective on June 1, 2015 and was amended on December 30, 2019. According to SAFE Circular
19, the foreign exchange capital of FIEs shall be subject to the Discretionary Foreign Exchange Settlement, which means that the foreign
exchange capital in the capital account of an FIE for which the rights and interests of monetary contribution have been confirmed by the
local foreign exchange bureau (or the book- entry registration of monetary contribution by the banks) can be settled at the banks based
on the actual operational needs of the FIE. The proportion of Discretionary Foreign Exchange Settlement of the foreign exchange capital
of an FIE is temporarily set at 100%. The Renminbi converted from the foreign exchange capital will be kept in a designated account and
if an FIE needs to make further payment from such account, it still needs to provide supporting documents and proceed with the review
process with the banks. Furthermore, SAFE Circular 19 stipulates that the use of capital by FIEs shall follow the principles of authenticity
and self-use within the business scope of enterprises. The capital of an FIE and capital in Renminbi obtained by the FIE from foreign
exchange settlement shall not be used for the following purposes: (i) directly or indirectly used for payments beyond the business scope
of the enterprises or payments as prohibited by relevant laws and regulations; (ii) directly or indirectly used for investment in securities
unless otherwise provided by the relevant laws and regulations; (iii) directly or indirectly used for issuance of RMB entrusted loans,
repayment of inter-enterprise loans (including advances by the third party) or repayment of bank loans that have been transferred to a
third party; or (iv) directly or indirectly used for expenses related to the purchase of real estate that is not for self-use (except
for the foreign-invested real estate enterprises).
The Circular on Reforming and Standardizing the
Foreign Exchange Settlement Management Policy of Capital Account, or SAFE Circular 16, was promulgated by SAFE on June 9, 2016. Pursuant
to SAFE Circular 16, enterprises registered in the PRC may also convert their foreign debts from foreign currency to Renminbi on a self-discretionary
basis. SAFE Circular 16 provides a unified standard for the conversion of foreign exchange under capital account items (including but
not limited to foreign currency capital and foreign debts) on a self- discretionary basis which applies to all enterprises registered
in the PRC. SAFE Circular 16 reiterates the principle that Renminbi converted from foreign currency-denominated capital of a company may
not be directly or indirectly used for purposes beyond its business scope or prohibited by PRC Laws, while such converted Renminbi shall
not be provided as loans to its non-associated enterprises.
On January 26, 2017, SAFE promulgated the Circular
on Further Improving Reform of Foreign Exchange Administration and Optimizing Genuineness and Compliance Verification, or Circular 3,
which stipulates several capital control measures with respect to the outbound remittance of profit from domestic entities to offshore
entities, including (i) under the principle of genuine transaction, banks shall check board resolutions regarding profit distribution,
the original version of tax filing records and audited financial statements; and (ii) domestic entities shall hold income to account for
previous years’ losses before remitting the profits. Moreover, pursuant to Circular 3, domestic entities shall make detailed explanations
of the sources of capital and utilization arrangements, and provide board resolutions, contracts and other proof when completing the registration
procedures in connection with an outbound investment. On October 23, 2019, SAFE promulgated the Notice for Further Advancing the Facilitation
of Cross-border Trade and Investment, or the SAFE Circular 28, which, among other things, allows all foreign-invested companies to use
Renminbi converted from foreign currency-denominated capital for equity investments in China, as long as the equity investment is genuine,
does not violate applicable laws, and complies with the negative list on foreign investment.
Regulation on Foreign Debt
A loan made by a foreign entity as direct or indirect
shareholder in an FIE is considered to be foreign debt in China and is regulated by various laws and regulations, including the Regulation
of the People’s Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration, the Interim Provisions on the Management of Foreign Debts,
the Statistical Monitoring of Foreign Debts Tentative Provisions, the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of Provisional Regulations
on Statistics and Supervision of Foreign Debt, and the Administrative Measures for Registration of Foreign Debts. Under these rules and
regulations, a shareholder loan in the form of foreign debt made to a PRC entity does not require the prior approval of SAFE. However,
such foreign debt must be registered with and recorded by SAFE or its local branches within 15 business days after entering into the foreign
debt contract. Pursuant to these rules and regulations, the maximum amount of the aggregate of (i) the outstanding balance of foreign
debts with a term not longer than one year, and (ii) the accumulated amount of foreign debts with a term longer than one year, of an FIE
shall not exceed the difference between its registered total investment and its registered capital, or Total Investment and Registered
Capital Balance.
On January 12, 2017, the People’s Bank of China, or PBOC, promulgated
the Notice of the People’s Bank of China on Full-coverage Macro-prudent Management of Cross-border Financing, or PBOC Circular 9,
which sets forth an upper limit for PRC entities, including FIEs and domestic enterprises, regarding their foreign debts. Pursuant to
PBOC Circular 9, PBOC establishes a cross-broader financing regulation system based on the capital or net assets of the micro main body
under macro prudential rules, and the legal entities and financial institutions established in PRC including the branches of foreign banks
registered in China but excluding government financing vehicles and real estate enterprise, may carry out cross-border financing of foreign
currency in accordance with relevant regulations of such system. PBOC Circular 9 provides that, among other things, the outstanding amount
of the foreign currency for the entities in cross-border financing shall be limited to the Upper Limit of the Risk Weighted Balance of
such entity, which shall be calculated according to the formula provided in PBOC Circular 9. PBOC Circular 9 also provides that during
the one-year period started from January 12, 2017, foreign-invested enterprises may choose one method to carry out cross-broader financing
in foreign currency either according to PBOC Circular 9 or according to the Interim Provisions on the Management of Foreign Debts. After
the end of such one-year period, the method of foreign-invested enterprises to carry out cross-broader financing in foreign currency will
be determined by PBOC and SAFE.
Regulation on Foreign Exchange Registration of Overseas Investment
by PRC Residents
SAFE issued the Circular on Relevant Issues Concerning
Foreign Exchange Control on Domestic Residents’ Offshore Investment and Financing and Roundtrip Investment Through Special Purpose
Vehicles, or SAFE Circular 37, to regulate foreign exchange matters in relation to the use of special purpose vehicles, or SPVs, by PRC
residents or entities to seek offshore investment and financing or conduct round trip investment in China. Under SAFE Circular 37, a SPV
refers to an offshore entity established or controlled, directly or indirectly, by PRC residents (including individuals and entities)
for the purpose of seeking offshore financing or making offshore investment, using legitimate onshore or offshore assets or interests,
while “round trip investment” refers to direct investment in China by PRC residents through SPVs, namely, establishing FIEs
to obtain the ownership, control rights and management rights. The term “control” under SAFE Circular 37 is broadly defined
as the operation rights, beneficiary rights or decision-making rights acquired by PRC residents in the offshore special purpose vehicles
by means of acquisition, trust, proxy, voting rights, repurchase, convertible bonds or other arrangements. SAFE Circular 37 provides that,
before making contribution into an SPV, PRC residents are required to complete foreign exchange registration with SAFE or its local branch.
SAFE promulgated the Notice on Further Simplifying and Improving Foreign Exchange Administration Policy on Direct Investment, which provides
that applications for foreign exchange registration of inbound foreign direct investments and outbound overseas direct investments, including
those required under SAFE Circular 37, will be filed with qualified banks instead of SAFE.
An amendment to the registration is required if
there is a material change with respect to the SPV registered, such as any change of basic information (including change of the PRC residents,
name and operation term), increases or decreases in investment amount, transfers or exchanges of shares, and mergers or divisions. Failure
to comply with the registration procedures set forth in SAFE Circular 37 and the subsequent notice, or making misrepresentation on or
failure to disclose controllers of the FIE that is established through round-trip investment, may result in restrictions being imposed
on the foreign exchange activities of the relevant FIE, including payment of dividends and other distributions, such as proceeds from
any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation, to its offshore parent or affiliate, and the capital inflow from the offshore
parent, and may also subject relevant PRC residents or entities to penalties under PRC foreign exchange administration regulations.
Regulation on Stock Incentive Plans
SAFE promulgated the Circular of the State Administration
of Foreign Exchange on Issues concerning the Administration of Foreign Exchange Used for Domestic Individuals’ Participation in
Equity Incentive Plans of Companies Listed Overseas, or the Stock Option Rules on February 15, 2012, replacing the previous rules issued
by SAFE in March 2007. Under the Stock Option Rules and other relevant rules and regulations, PRC citizens and non-PRC citizens who reside
in China for a continuous period of not less than one year and participate in any stock incentive plan of an overseas publicly listed
company are required to register with SAFE through a domestic qualified agent, which could be a PRC subsidiary of such overseas-listed
company, and complete certain other procedures, unless certain exceptions are available. The domestic qualified agent is required to amend
the SAFE registration with respect to the stock incentive plan if there is any material change to the stock incentive plan, the domestic
qualified or other material changes. In addition, an overseas-entrusted institution must be retained to handle matters in connection with
the exercise or sale of stock options and the purchase or sale of shares and interests.
In addition, the State Administration of Taxation
(“SAT”) has issued certain circulars concerning employee share options or restricted shares. Under these circulars, the employees
working in China who exercise share options or are granted restricted shares will be subject to PRC individual income tax. The PRC subsidiaries
of such overseas listed company have obligations to file documents related to employee share options or restricted shares with relevant
tax authorities and to withhold individual income taxes of those employees who exercise their share options. If the employees fail to
pay or the PRC subsidiaries fail to withhold their income taxes according to relevant laws and regulations, the PRC subsidiaries may face
sanctions imposed by the tax authorities or other PRC government authorities.
Regulation Relating to Taxation
Enterprise Income Tax
On March 16, 2007, the NPC enacted the Enterprise
Income Tax Law, which was last amended on December 29, 2018, and on December 6, 2007, the State Council promulgated the Implementing Rules
of the Enterprise Income Tax Law, which became effective on January 1, 2008 and was amended on April 23, 2019 (or collectively, the PRC
EIT Law). The PRC EIT Law applies a uniform 25% enterprise income tax rate to both FIEs and domestic enterprises, except where tax incentives
are granted to special industries and projects. Enterprises qualifying as “High and New Technology Enterprises” are entitled
to a preferential 15% enterprise income tax rate rather than the 25% statutory tax rate. The preferential tax treatment continues as long
as an enterprise can retain its “High and New Technology Enterprise” status.
Under the PRC EIT Law, an enterprise established
outside China with its “de facto management body” located in China is considered a “resident enterprise”, which
means it can be treated as a domestic enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes. A non-resident enterprise that does not have an establishment
or place of business in China, or has an establishment or place of business in China but the income of which has no actual relationship
with such establishment or place of business, shall pay enterprise income tax on its income deriving from inside China at the reduced
rate of enterprise income tax of 10% and such income tax shall be subject to withholding at the source, where the payer shall act as the
withholding agent. Dividends generated after January 1, 2008 and payable by an FIE in China to its foreign enterprise investors are subject
to a 10% withholding tax, unless any such foreign investor’s jurisdiction of incorporation has a tax treaty with China that provides
for a preferential withholding arrangement.
The Notice on Issues Concerning the Determination
of Chinese-Controlled Enterprises Registered Overseas as Resident Enterprises on the Basis of Their Bodies of Actual Management, or the
SAT Circular 82, provides certain specific criteria for determining whether the “de facto management body” of a PRC-controlled
enterprise that is incorporated offshore is located in China. According to the SAT Circular 82, an offshore incorporated enterprise controlled
by a PRC enterprise or a PRC enterprise group will be regarded as a PRC tax resident by virtue of having its “de facto management
body” in China, and will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on its global income only if all of the following conditions are
met: (i) the primary location of the day-to-day operational management is in the PRC; (ii) decisions relating to the enterprise’s
financial and human resource matters are made or are subject to approval by organizations or personnel in the PRC; (iii) the enterprise’s
primary assets, accounting books and records, company seals, and board and shareholder resolutions are located or maintained in the PRC;
and (iv) at least 50% of voting board members or senior executives habitually reside in the PRC.
Pursuant to the Arrangement between mainland China
and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect
to Taxes on Income, the withholding tax rate in respect to the payment of dividends by a mainland China enterprise to a Hong Kong enterprise
may be reduced to 5% from a standard rate of 10% if the Hong Kong enterprise directly holds at least 25% of the mainland China enterprise
and certain other conditions are satisfied. Pursuant to the Notice of the State Administration of Taxation on the Issues concerning the
Application of the Dividend Clauses of Tax Agreements, a Hong Kong resident enterprise must meet the following conditions, among others,
in order to apply the reduced withholding tax rate: (i) it must be a company; (ii) it must directly own the required percentage of equity
interests and voting rights in the mainland China resident enterprise; and (iii) it must have directly owned such required percentage
in the mainland China resident enterprise throughout the 12 months prior to receiving the dividends.
On February 3, 2015, the SAT issued the Bulletin
on Issues of Enterprise Income Tax on Indirect Transfers or Assets by Non-PRC Resident Enterprises, or SAT Bulletin 7, which extends its
tax jurisdiction to transactions involving the transfer of taxable assets through offshore transfer of a foreign intermediate holding
company. Pursuant to SAT Bulletin 7, where a non-resident enterprise indirectly transfers properties such as equity in PRC resident enterprises
without any justifiable business purposes and aiming to avoid the payment of enterprise income tax, such indirect transfer must be reclassified
as a direct transfer of equity in PRC resident enterprise. To assess whether an indirect transfer of PRC taxable properties has reasonable
commercial purposes, all arrangements related to the indirect transfer must be considered comprehensively and factors set forth in SAT
Bulletin 7 must be comprehensively analyzed in light of the actual circumstances. In addition, SAT Bulletin 7 has introduced safe harbors
for internal group restructurings and the purchase and sale of equity securities through a public securities market.
On October 17, 2017, the SAT issued the Announcement
of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Concerning the Withholding of Non-resident Enterprise Income Tax at Source, or SAT Bulletin
37, which further clarifies the practice and procedure of the withholding of non-resident enterprise income tax.
Value-Added Tax
Pursuant to the Provisional Regulations on PRC
Value-added Tax and its implementation regulations, unless otherwise specified by relevant laws and regulations, any entity or individual
engaged in the sale of services, intangible assets or immovable properties within the territory of China are also required to pay a value-added
tax, or VAT, for revenues generated from sales of products, while qualified input VAT paid on taxable purchase can be offset against such
output VAT.
Regulation Relating to M&A and Overseas
Listings
On August 8, 2006, six PRC regulatory agencies,
including the MOFCOM, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, the SAT, the SAMR, the China Securities Regulatory
Commission, or the CSRC, and SAFE jointly issued the Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign Investors,
or the M&A Rules, which became effective on September 8, 2006 and was amended on June 22, 2009. The M&A Rules requires in some
instances that the MOFCOM be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor takes control of a PRC
domestic enterprise where any of the following situations exist: (i) the transaction involves an important industry in China, (ii) the
transaction may affect national economic security, or (iii) the PRC domestic enterprise has a well-known trademark or historical Chinese
trade name in China. The M&A Rules, among other things, also require that (i) PRC entities or individuals obtain MOFCOM approval before
they establish or control an SPV overseas, provided that they intend to use the SPV to acquire their equity interests in a PRC company
at the consideration of newly issued share of the SPV, or Share Swap, and list their equity interests in the PRC company overseas by listing
the SPV in an overseas market; (ii) the SPV obtains MOFCOM’s approval before it acquires the equity interests held by the PRC entities
or PRC individual in the PRC company by Share Swap; and (iii) the SPV obtains CSRC approval before it lists overseas.
The M&A Rules further requires that the MOFCOM
be notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign investor acquires control of a PRC domestic enterprise
or a foreign company with substantial PRC operations, if certain thresholds under the Provisions on Thresholds for Prior Notification
of Concentrations of Undertakings, issued by the State Council, are triggered. Moreover, the Anti-Monopoly Law promulgated by the Standing
Committee of the NPC requires that transactions which are deemed concentrations and involve parties with specified turnover thresholds
be cleared by the MOFCOM before they can be completed.
On February 17, 2023, with the approval of the
State Council, the CSRC released the Trial Administrative Measures of Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies,
or the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, and five supporting guidelines, which came into effect on March 31, 2023. According to
the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, (1) domestic companies that seek to offer
or list securities overseas, both directly and indirectly, should fulfill the filing procedure and report relevant information to the
CSRC; (2) if the issuer meets both of the following conditions, the overseas offering and listing shall be determined as an indirect overseas
offering and listing by a domestic company: (i) any of the total assets, net assets, revenues or profits of the domestic operating entities
of the issuer in the most recent accounting year accounts for more than 50% of the corresponding figure in the issuer’s audited
consolidated financial statements for the same period; (ii) its major operational activities are carried out in China or its main places
of business are located in China, or the senior managers in charge of operation and management of the issuer are mostly Chinese citizens
or are domiciled in China; and (3) where a domestic company seeks to indirectly offer and list securities in an overseas market, the issuer
shall designate a major domestic operating entity responsible for all filing procedures with the CSRC, and where an issuer makes an application
for initial public offering and listing in an overseas market, the issuer shall submit filings with the CSRC within three business days
after such application is submitted.
On the same day, the CSRC held a press conference
for the release of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures and issued the Notice on Administration for the Filing of Overseas Offering and
Listing by Domestic Companies, which, among others, clarifies that (1) domestic companies that have been listed on a foreign stock exchange
prior to the effective date of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures are not required to go through the filing procedure immediately but
may be required to go through the filing procedure if future fund raising activities are involved; (2) a six-month transition period will
be granted to domestic companies which, prior to the effective date of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, have already obtained the
approval from overseas regulatory authorities or stock exchanges (such as the completion of hearing in the market of Hong Kong or the
completion of registration in the market of the United States), but have not completed the indirect overseas listing; if domestic companies
fail to complete the overseas listing within such six-month transition period, they are required to file with the CSRC according to the
requirements; and (3) the CSRC will solicit opinions from relevant regulatory authorities and complete the filing of the overseas listing
of companies with contractual arrangements which duly meet the compliance requirements, and support the development and growth of these
companies by enabling them to utilize two markets and two kinds of resources.
On February 24, 2023, the CSRC jointly with other
government authorities issued the Provisions on Strengthening Confidentiality and Archives Administration of Overseas Securities Offering
and Listing by Domestic Companies, or the Overseas Listing Archives Rules, as a supporting rule to the Overseas Listing Trial Measures,
which came into effect on March 31, 2023. Pursuant to the Overseas Listing Archives Rules, domestic companies that
seek to offer or list securities overseas directly or indirectly, and securities companies and securities related service providers
providing services to such domestic companies shall etablish confidentiality and archives administration system, adopt requisite measures
to perform the responsibilities of confidentiality and archives administration, and shall not divulge state secrets and state agencies’
work secrets, or harm state and public interests. The Overseas Listing Archives Rules provide, among others, that before providing or
disclosing any document or material which involve state secrets or state agencies’ work secrets, domectic companies shall apply
to the competent government authorities for approval and file with the secrecy administration authuroties for record.
Regulations on Anti-Monopoly
The Anti-Monopoly Law promulgated by the Standing
Committee of the National People’s Congress which became effective on August 1, 2008 and was last amended on June 24, 2022 and the
Interim Provisions on the Review of Concentrations of Undertakings promulgated by the SAMR which became effective on December 1, 2020
and was last amended on March 24, 2022 require that transactions which are deemed concentrations and involve parties with specified turnover
thresholds must be cleared by the SAMR before they can be completed. Where the participation in concentration of undertakings by way of
foreign-funded merger and acquisition of domestic enterprises or any other method which involves national security, the examination of
concentration of undertakings shall be carried out pursuant to the provisions of this Law and examination of national security shall be
carried out pursuant to the relevant provisions of the State. Failure to comply with above regulations may result in an order to stop
concentration, dispose the shares/assets or transfer the operation within a stipulated period, or adopt other necessary measures to reinstate
the pre-concentration status, or fines.
On February 7, 2021, the Anti-monopoly Commission
of the State Council issued the Anti-monopoly Guidelines for the Internet Platform Economy Sector that aims at specifying some of the
circumstances under which an activity of internet platforms may be identified as monopolistic act as well as classifying that concentrations
involving variable interest entities shall also be subject to anti-monopoly review.
Regulations on Anti Long-Arm Jurisdiction
The MOFCOM issued the Provisions on the List of
Unreliable Entities, or the MOFCOM Order No. 4 of 2020, on September 19, 2020. Pursuant to the MOFCOM Order No. 4 of 2020, the working
mechanism shall, according to the investigation results and by taking the following factors into comprehensive consideration, decide whether
or not to include a foreign entity concerned in the list of unreliable entities, and make an announcement on such inclusion: (i) the extent
of damage caused to China’s sovereignty, security and development interests; (ii) the extent of the damage to the legitimate rights
and interests of Chinese enterprises, other organizations or individuals; (iii) whether or not the international economic and trade rules
are followed; (iv) other factors that shall be taken into consideration. If a foreign entity is included in the list of unreliable entities,
the working mechanism may decide to take one or more of the following measures: (i) restricting or prohibiting the foreign entity from
engaging in import or export activities related to China; (ii) restricting or prohibiting the foreign entity’s investment within
the territory of China; (iii) restricting or prohibiting the entry of the foreign entity’s relevant personnel or transport vehicles
into the territory of China; (iv) restricting or cancelling the work permit, stay or residence qualification of the foreign entity’s
relevant personnel in China; (v) imposing a fine corresponding to the seriousness of the case against the foreign entity; (vi) Other necessary
measures.
On January 9, 2021, the MOFCOM promulgated the
Rules on Counteracting Unjustified Extra-Territorial Application of Foreign Legislation and Other Measures, or the MOFCOM Order No. 1
of 2021. Pursuant to the MOFCOM Order No. 1 of 2021, where a citizen, legal person or other organization of China is prohibited or restricted
by foreign legislation and other measures from engaging in normal economic, trade and related activities with a third State (or region)
or its citizens, legal persons or other organizations, he/she/it shall truthfully report such matters to the competent department of commerce
of the State Council within 30 days. The working mechanism will take following factors into overall account when assessing whether there
exists unjustified extra-territorial application of foreign legislation and other measures: (i) whether international law or the basic
principles of international relations are violated; (ii) potential impact on China’s national sovereignty, security and development
interests; (iii) potential impact on the legitimate rights and interests of the citizens, legal persons or other organizations of China;
(iv) other factors that shall be taken into account. If the working mechanism determine that there exists unjustified extra-territorial
application of foreign legislation and other measures, MOFCOM may issue an injunction that the relevant foreign legislation and other
measures shall not be accepted, executed, or observed. A citizen, legal person or other organization in China may apply for exemption
from compliance with an injunction.
4.C. Organizational Structure
The following chart shows our corporate structure,
including our principal subsidiaries and VIE as of the date of this annual report.
Note:
(1) | Mr. Yi Zhang, our founder, chairman and chief executive officer
is the sole shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda. |
Contractual Arrangements with The VIE and The
VIE’s Shareholder
Current PRC laws and
regulations impose certain restrictions or prohibitions on foreign ownership of companies that engage in value-added telecommunication
services and certain other businesses. We are an exempted company with limited liablity incorporated in the Cayman Islands. Shanghai Zhangxinrui
is our PRC subsidiary and considered a foreign-invested enterprise (or WFOE) under PRC Laws. To comply with PRC laws and regulations,
we conduct certain of our business in China through Shanghai Zhangda (or the VIE), based on a series of contractual arrangements by and
among Shanghai Zhangxinrui, the VIE and its shareholder.
Our contractual arrangements
with the VIE and its shareholder allow us to (i) be considered as the primary beneficiary of the VIE, (ii) receive substantially all of
the economic benefits of the VIE, and (iii) have an exclusive call option to purchase all or part of the equity interests in the VIE when
and to the extent permitted by PRC law.
As a result of our direct
ownership in Shanghai Zhangxinrui and the contractual arrangements with the VIE, we are regarded as the primary beneficiary of the VIE
for accounting purposes. We have consolidated the financial results of the VIE in our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with U.S. GAAP, to the extent the conditions for consolidation of the VIE under U.S. GAAP are satisfied.
The following is a summary
of the contractual arrangements by and among Shanghai Zhangxinrui, the VIE and its shareholder. For the complete text of these contractual
arrangements, please see the copies filed as exhibits to this annual report.
In the opinion of
Tian Yuan Law Firm, our PRC legal counsel, as of the date of this annual report and save for the uncertainties disclosed in this annual
report:
| ● | the
ownership structures of the VIE and Shanghai Zhangxinrui in China are not in violation of
applicable PRC laws and regulations currently in effect; and |
| ● | the
contractual arrangements between Shanghai Zhangxinrui, the VIE and its shareholder
governed by PRC law are valid, binding and enforceable, and will not result in any violation
of applicable PRC laws and regulations currently in effect. |
However, our PRC legal
counsel has also advised us that there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current and future
PRC laws, regulations and rules. Accordingly, the PRC regulatory authorities may take a view that is contrary to the opinion of our PRC
legal counsel. It is uncertain whether any new PRC laws or regulations relating to variable interest entity structures will be adopted
or if adopted, what they would provide. If we or the VIE is found to be in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations,
or fail to obtain or maintain any of the required permits or approvals, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities would have broad discretion
to take action in dealing with such violations or failures. We have been further advised by our PRC legal counsel that if the PRC government
authorities find that the agreements that establish the structure for operating our value-added telecommunication services and other business
do not comply with PRC government restrictions on foreign investment in such businesses, we could be subject to severe penalties including
being prohibited from continuing operations. Additionally, these contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct ownership
in providing us with effective control over the VIE. If the VIE or its shareholder fail to perform their respective obligations under
such contractual arrangements, we could be limited in our ability to enforce such contractual arrangements in the PRC and may have to
incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. We may also have to rely on legal remedies under
PRC law, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and claiming damages, which we cannot assure will be effective.
Additionally, the ability of our PRC subsidiary to pay dividends to us is limited by certain PRC legal restrictions on the payment of
dividends by PRC companies and foreign exchange control, among others, which prevent us from having unfettered access to our PRC subsidiary’s
and VIE’s revenues. Our access to the VIE’s revenues is also limited since we do not have direct ownership in the VIE and
have to rely on the payment of service fees by the VIE to our PRC subsidiary. See “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks
Relating to Our Corporate Structure—If the PRC government finds that the agreements that establish the structure for operating certain
of our operations in China do not comply with PRC regulations relating to the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation
of existing regulations change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those
operations,” “Item 3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Corporate Structure—Our current
corporate structure and business operations may be affected by the Foreign Investment Law and its Implementation Rules” and “Item
3. Key Information—3.D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in China—Uncertainties in the interpretation and
enforcement of PRC laws and regulations could limit the legal protections available to you and us.”
Exclusive Management
Services and Business Cooperation Agreement
Under the exclusive
management services and business cooperation agreements, Shanghai Zhangxinrui has agreed to provide the
following services to Shanghai Zhangda:
| ● | provide
or designate any third-party to provide, among other things, license of technology and software,
development, maintenance and update of relevant software, design, installation and daily
management, maintenance and update of computer network systems, hardware equipment and databases,
development and test of new offerings, employee professional support and training services,
market survey and research services, enterprise management consulting, lease of facilities
and property and other business and technological support as needed to Shanghai Zhangda; |
| ● | the licensing of technology and software legally owned by Shanghai Zhangxinrui; |
| ● | the development, maintenance and update of software involved in Shanghai Zhangda; |
| ● | the design, installation, daily management, maintenance and updating of computer network systems, hardware equipment and databases
of Shanghai Zhangda; |
| ● | the development and test of new offerings, employee professional
support and training services of Shanghai Zhangda; |
| ● | the assistance in consultancy, collection and research of technology and market information (excluding market research business that
wholly foreign-owned enterprises are prohibited from conducting under PRC law); |
| ● | the provision of market survey and research services; |
| ● | the provision of enterprise management consulting; |
| ● | the leasing of facilities and property; and |
| ● | other business and technological support as needed to Shanghai Zhangda from time to time
to the extent permitted under PRC law. |
Shanghai
Zhangda agrees to pay service fees to Shanghai Zhangxinrui in an amount equal to the income of Shanghai Zhangda, deducting necessary costs
and expenses acknowledged by Shanghai Zhangxinrui. Without the prior written consent of Shanghai Zhangxinrui, Shanghai
Zhangda cannot accept services provided by, or establish similar cooperation relationship with, any third-party. Shanghai Zhangxinrui
has the exclusive ownership of all intellectual property rights created as a result of the performance of this agreement. The exclusive
management services and business cooperation agreement has an indefinite term, unless otherwise terminated by Shanghai Zhangxinrui in
its sole discretion with 30 days’ prior written notice or pursuant to the mandatory requirement under PRC laws or regulations. Under
no circumstances can Shanghai Zhangda terminate the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreement without the written
consent of Shanghai Zhangxinrui.
Equity Interest
Pledge Agreement
In
September 2022, Shanghai Zhangxinrui, Shanghai Zhangda and the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda entered into an equity pledge agreement.
Pursuant to the equity pledge agreement, the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda pledged all of his equity interests of Shanghai Zhangda to
Shanghai Zhangxinrui as security for performance of the obligations of Shanghai Zhangda and the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda, under
the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreement, the exclusive option agreement and power of attorney. During the
term of the equity pledge agreement, Shanghai Zhangxinrui has the right to receive all of Shanghai Zhangda’s dividends and profits
distributed on the pledged equity. If any of the specified events of default occurs, Shanghai Zhangxinrui, as pledgee, will have the right
to auction or sell all or part of the pledged equity interests in Shanghai Zhangda and will have priority in receiving the proceeds from
such disposal. Shanghai Zhangxinrui may transfer all or any of its rights and obligations under the equity pledge agreement to its designee(s)
at any time. Shanghai Zhangda and its shareholder undertake that, without the prior written consent of Shanghai Zhangxinrui, they will
not transfer, or create or allow any encumbrance on the pledged equity interests. The agreement will remain in effect until the fulfillment
of all the obligations under the exclusive management services and business cooperation agreement, the exclusive option agreement and
power of attorney.
We have completed the
registration of the equity interest pledge under the equity pledge agreement in relation to Shanghai Zhangxinrui and Shanghai Zhangda
with the relevant office of the State Administration for Market Regulation in accordance with the PRC Civil Code.
Exclusive Option
Agreement
In September 2022, Shanghai
Zhangxinrui, Shanghai Zhangda and the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda entered into an exclusive option agreement. Under the exclusive
option agreement, the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda has irrevocably granted Shanghai Zhangxinrui an exclusive call option to purchase,
or designate a third-party to purchase, all or any part of his equity interests in Shanghai Zhangda at a purchase price equal to the higher
of (i) actual capital contribution, and (ii) the lowest price permissible by the then-applicable PRC laws and regulations. Shanghai Zhangda
has irrevocably granted Shanghai Zhangxinrui an exclusive call option to purchase, or designate a third-party to purchase, all or any
part of its assets, at a purchase price equal to the lowest price permissible by the then-applicable PRC laws and regulations. Shanghai
Zhangda and the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda covenant that, without Shanghai Zhangxinrui’s prior written consent, they will not,
among other things, (i) amend Shanghai Zhangda’s articles of association or change Shanghai Zhangda’s registered capital
or change its equity interests structure; (ii) cause Shanghai Zhangda to enter into any material contract to which Shanghai Zhangda
is a party, except in the ordinary course of business; (iii) allow Shanghai Zhangda to incur, inherit, guarantee or permit any debts,
except for those payables incurred in the ordinary or usual course of business or those disclosed to and agreed by Shanghai Zhangxinrui;
(iv) merge or consolidate Shanghai Zhangda with any other entity or acquire or invest in any other entity; (v) distribute any
dividend; (vi) sell, transfer, mortgage or otherwise dispose of any of Shanghai Zhangda’s assets or allow any encumbrance of
any assets; or (vii) terminate, liquidate or dissolve Shanghai Zhangda unless otherwise provided by PRC laws and regulations. The
shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda covenants that, without Shanghai Zhangxinrui’s prior written consent, he will not, among other things,
(i) create any pledge or encumbrance on the equity interests in Shanghai Zhangda; (ii) sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of
his equity interests in Shanghai Zhangda. The exclusive option agreement remains effective until all of the equity interests in or all
of the assets of Shanghai Zhangda are transferred to Shanghai Zhangxinrui or its designee(s) in the manner provided in the exclusive option
agreements. Under no circumstances can Shanghai Zhangda or its shareholder unilaterally terminate the exclusive option agreement unless
otherwise provided by mandatory PRC laws and regulations.
Powers of Attorney
In September 2022, the
shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda granted an irrevocable power of attorney. Pursuant to the power of attorney, the shareholder of Shanghai
Zhangda irrevocably authorized Shanghai Zhangxinrui or its designee(s) to act on his behalf as proxy attorney, to the extent permitted
by law, to exercise all rights of shareholder concerning all the equity interest held by the shareholder in Shanghai Zhangda, including
but not limited to proposing to convene or attend shareholders meetings, receiving any notice about the convening of the shareholders
meeting and related procedures, signing written resolutions, voting at such meetings, nominating and appointing directors and selling,
transferring, pledging or disposing of all the equity held in part or in whole, and exercising all other rights as shareholder. The power
of attorney issued by the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda will remain in force for so long as the shareholder remains a shareholder of
Shanghai Zhangda.
Spousal Consent
Letters
In September 2022, the
spouse of the shareholder of Shanghai Zhangda signed a spousal consent letter. Pursuant to the consent letter, the spouse of the shareholder
of Shanghai Zhangda unconditionally and irrevocably agreed that the equity interest in Shanghai Zhangda held by and registered in the
name of such shareholder be disposed of in accordance with the power of attorney, the equity pledge agreement, and the exclusive option
agreement described above, and that such shareholder may perform, amend or terminate such agreements without any additional consent of
his spouse. Additionally, the signing spouse agreed not to assert any rights over the equity interest in Shanghai Zhangda held by the
shareholder. In addition, in the event that the signing spouse obtain any equity interest in Shanghai Zhangda held by the shareholder
for any reason, she agrees to be bound by and sign any legal documents substantially similar to the contractual arrangements described
above, as may be amended from time to time.
4.D. Property, Plant and Equipment
Our principal
executive offices are located in Shanghai, China, and we have also leased offices in Xi’an, where we operate with an aggregate of
approximately 1,346 square meters as of December 31, 2022. We lease all of the facilities that we currently occupy from independent third
parties. We believe that the facilities that we currently lease are adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future.