All figures are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise
stated.
This news release contains forward-looking information
that is subject to risk factors and assumptions, please refer to
the sections on Material Assumptions & Risks and Cautionary
Note Regarding Forward-looking Information.
TORONTO, Nov. 16, 2016 /CNW/ - Centerra Gold Inc.
("Centerra") (TSX: CG) and Premier Gold Mines Limited ("Premier")
(TSX: PG) are pleased to announce the Feasibility Study results for
the Hardrock Project (the "Project") located in Geraldton, Ontario. On March 9, 2015, Centerra and Premier formed a
50/50 partnership (the "Partnership") for the joint ownership and
development of the Trans-Canada Property (now called the Greenstone
Gold Property) which includes the Hardrock Project, other deposits,
and exploration properties. The managing partner of the
Partnership is Greenstone Gold Mines GP Inc. (the "Managing
Partner" or "GGM" or the "Company").
The Feasibility Study for the Hardrock Project – Canada, with an effective date of October 2016 and an issue date of November 2, 2016, was prepared by G Mining
Services Inc. ("GMS") in collaboration with third party consulting
firms.
Highlights of the Feasibility Study results and life-of-mine
("LOM") plan on a 100% basis and on the assumption that the
Partnership is a standalone taxable Canadian entity are as
follows:
- Open-pit probable mineral reserves of 4.7 million contained
ounces of gold (141.7 million tonnes at average gold grade of 1.02
grams per tonne gold (g/t Au) using a cut-off grade of 0.33 g/t Au)
and includes 17.3% mining dilution;
- LOM gold production of 4.2 million ounces and 14.5 years of
operations;
- Average LOM annual gold production of 288,000 ounces;
- Mill throughput designed to operate at 27,000 tonnes per day
(t/d);
- Gold price assumption of US$1,250/oz, and an exchange rate of
CAD/USD 1.30;
- Initial capital cost of $1.25
billion (US$962 million),
which includes a contingency of $131
million (US$101 million);
- Total LOM sustaining capital1 of $257 million (US$198
million);
- Total operating cost of $20.95
per tonne and all-in sustaining cost1 of $780 per ounce (US$600 per ounce);
- After-tax payback period of 4.5 years; and
- After-tax net present value (NPV) at 5% discount rate of
$709 million (US$545 million), and an after-tax 14.4% project
internal rate of return ("IRR") on a pre-finance basis.
The Partnership has not made a development or construction
decision on the Project. Going forward, the Partnership
expects to evaluate programs to minimize the risk profile of the
Project including the advancement of permitting and First Nation
discussions, continue to advance discussions relating to project
financing and completing and submitting the Environmental
Assessments based on the Feasibility Study which would incorporate
comments already received from the agencies and affected
stakeholders. Budgets for these programs are currently being
developed by the Managing Partner for review.
The Partnership will be hosting a technical teach-in on this
Feasibility Study via a presentation, webcast and conference call,
today, Wednesday, November 16 at
5:00pm at the Toronto Board of Trade. Details of this
event can be found at the bottom of this news release.
Scott Perry, Chief Executive
Officer of Centerra Gold stated, "Finalizing the Feasibility Study
is an important milestone for the Project. The Feasibility
Study reflects the combined experience and efforts of GGM
management and the Partnership's consultants under the guidance of
a management committee made up of 50% Centerra and 50% Premier
representatives. The Hardrock Project clearly represents one of
Canada's largest undeveloped open
pit gold mines."
"The completion of this Feasibility Study is another major
milestone for Premier and sets the stage for the next steps to
develop this significant deposit," stated Ewan Downie, President and CEO of Premier Gold
Mines. "Our engagement with the representatives of the local
communities has been extremely positive and we look forward to
continued advancement of the Project with Centerra, under our
Greenstone Partnership Agreement, on behalf of all
stakeholders."
Project Economics
Over a period of 14.5 years, the
Project is expected to process 141.7 million tonnes at an average
grade of 1.02 g/t Au producing 4.2 million ounces of recovered gold
at an average all-in sustaining cost(1) of $780 per ounce sold.
Gold production is expected to average 356,000 ounces per year
for the first four full years of production (38 million tonnes
milled with an average head grade of 1.27 g/t Au).
The Feasibility Study includes mineral reserves for the open-pit
Hardrock deposit only. There may be a potential opportunity
to improve the LOM average grade by processing higher grade
material from the other Partnership deposits such as Brookbank or
the Hardrock underground resource. These opportunities are
currently being reviewed; however there are no assurances that
these additional deposits would be developed.
The key economic parameters and Feasibility Study results are
summarized in Table 1.
Table 1 Summary of Economic Parameters and Feasibility Study
Results
Gold price - base
case (US$/oz)
|
1,250
|
Exchange rate
(C$/US$)
|
1.30
|
Mine life
(years)
|
14.5
|
Tonnes of ore
(Mt)
|
141.7
|
Strip ratio
(Waste:Ore)
|
3.87:1
|
Design throughput
rate (t/d)
|
27,000
|
Average grade (g/t
Au)
|
1.02
|
Average gold recovery
(%)
|
90.2
|
Average annual gold
production (koz)
|
288
|
Total recovered gold
(koz)
|
4,193
|
Initial capital
expenditures (M $)
|
1,247
|
Sustaining capital (M
$)(1)
|
257
|
All-in sustaining
cost ($/oz)(1)
|
780
|
Project after-tax
NPV5% (M $)
|
709
|
Project after-tax IRR
(%)(2)
|
14.4
|
(1)
|
Non-GAAP
measure. See "Non-GAAP Measures"
|
(2)
|
The IRR is based on
an after-tax, pre-financing basis.
|
The Project after-tax NPV at a discount rate of 5% is estimated
to be $709 million. The
after-tax Project cash flow results in a 4.5-year payback period
from the commencement of commercial operations with an after-tax
IRR of 14.4% (after-tax and pre-financing basis). The total
after-tax cash flow over the Project life is estimated to be
$1,636 million.
The after-tax analysis and results in the study are based on a
standalone taxable Canadian entity and not a partnership.
However, the income or loss that is generated at the partnership
level will be reallocated to Centerra and Premier to be treated
independently. Therefore the after-tax economic assessment on
a standalone basis is only conceptual and does not reflect the
potential benefits of any historical Canadian tax positions held by
either Centerra or Premier (if any).
As contemplated in the Partnership Agreement entered into in
March 2015, Centerra agreed to make
capital contributions to the Partnership in the aggregate amount of
$185 million, half of which is paid
on behalf of Premier. The $185
million is subject to the satisfaction of certain
feasibility study results and project advancement criteria.
Centerra has contributed approximately $47.2
million in capital contributions to the Partnership as of
November 3, 2016, a portion of which
has been used to fund the completion of the Feasibility Study.
Once Centerra has funded the full amount of $185 million, future contributions will be on a
50/50 basis with Premier, pursuant to approved annual programs and
budgets.
The yearly estimated LOM cash flow is shown in Table 2.
Table 2 Life-of-Mine Cash
Flow
Year
|
Gold
Revenue 2 ($
M)
|
Operating
Cost ($ M)
|
Initial
Capital ($ M)
|
Sustaining
Capital1 ($
M)
|
Other3 ($ M)
|
Pre-tax
Cash
Flow ($ M)
|
Taxes ($
M)
|
After-tax
Cash
Flow ($ M)
|
-3
|
-
|
-
|
(50)
|
-
|
-
|
(50)
|
-
|
(50)
|
-2
|
-
|
-
|
(329)
|
-
|
-
|
(329)
|
-
|
(329)
|
-1
|
-
|
-
|
(624)
|
-
|
(1)
|
(625)
|
-
|
(625)
|
1
|
262
|
(106)
|
(244)
|
(1)
|
(7)
|
(96)
|
-
|
(96)
|
2
|
665
|
(228)
|
-
|
(50)
|
-
|
387
|
(29)
|
358
|
3
|
582
|
(238)
|
-
|
(32)
|
(1)
|
311
|
(31)
|
280
|
4
|
566
|
(238)
|
-
|
(18)
|
(1)
|
310
|
(41)
|
269
|
5
|
501
|
(235)
|
-
|
(26)
|
(1)
|
238
|
(36)
|
202
|
6
|
409
|
(232)
|
-
|
(16)
|
(2)
|
160
|
(18)
|
142
|
7
|
562
|
(240)
|
-
|
(33)
|
(7)
|
282
|
(68)
|
214
|
8
|
387
|
(226)
|
-
|
(31)
|
(2)
|
128
|
(26)
|
102
|
9
|
432
|
(221)
|
-
|
(30)
|
(6)
|
176
|
(46)
|
130
|
10
|
560
|
(215)
|
-
|
(15)
|
(10)
|
321
|
(92)
|
229
|
11
|
530
|
(202)
|
-
|
(3)
|
(7)
|
318
|
(90)
|
228
|
12
|
547
|
(188)
|
-
|
(0)
|
(9)
|
349
|
(102)
|
247
|
13
|
362
|
(159)
|
-
|
(2)
|
(7)
|
194
|
(54)
|
140
|
14
|
275
|
(129)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
146
|
(39)
|
107
|
15
|
156
|
(92)
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
65
|
(14)
|
50
|
16
|
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
43
|
42
|
(4)
|
37
|
Total
|
6,796
|
(2,950)
|
(1,247)
|
(257)
|
(16)
|
2,325
|
(689)
|
1,636
|
1.
|
Non-GAAP measure, see
discussion under "Non-GAAP Measures".
|
2.
|
Pre-production gold
sales (11,000 ounces) treated as credit against pre-production
costs in construction capital.
|
3.
|
Includes working
capital, reclamation fund and salvage value.
|
4.
|
Numbers may not add
due to rounding.
|
Sensitivities of the Project NPV to the gold price, discount
rate and other Project variables are presented in Table 3 and Table
4.
Table 3: After-Tax NPV Sensitivity to Discount Rate
Discount
Rate
|
After-Tax
Project NPV (M
$)
|
5%
|
709
|
6%
|
587
|
7%
|
481
|
8%
|
387
|
Table 4: After-Tax Sensitivity Analysis to NPV5%
and IRR
|
NPV5%
|
IRR
|
Feasibility Study
(FS)
Variable
|
-15% ($
M)
|
FS ($
M)
|
+15% ($
M)
|
-15%
(%)
|
FS (%)
|
+15%
(%)
|
Operating
Costs
|
873
|
709
|
543
|
16.3
|
14.4
|
12.4
|
Capital
Costs
|
824
|
709
|
590
|
17.4
|
14.4
|
12.1
|
Exchange Rate
(CAD/USD)
|
314
|
709
|
1,093
|
9.6
|
14.4
|
18.5
|
Gold Price
|
293
|
709
|
1,113
|
9.2
|
14.4
|
19.0
|
Geology & Mineral Resources
Geology
The Hardrock deposit is an epigenetic non-stratiform banded
iron-formation ("BIF") hosted gold deposit.
Mineral Resources
The in-pit mineral resources at the Hardrock deposit are
constrained within an optimized pit design shell using a cut-off
grade of 0.30 g/t Au. In addition to in-pit mineral
resources, underground mineral resources were estimated outside the
optimized pit design shell using a 2.0 g/t Au cut-off grade.
Combined open pit and underground indicated mineral resources total
146 million tonnes grading 1.36 g/t Au containing 6.4 million
ounces of gold. The Project open pit and underground Mineral
Resources are summarized in Table 5 Mineral Resource
Estimate. Mineral resources as presented are exclusive of
mineral reserves.
Table 5: Mineral Resource Estimate
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
Resource
Type
|
|
In-Pit >0.30 g/t Au
cut-off
|
Underground >2.00 g/t Au
cut-off
|
Total
|
Indicated
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
11.4
|
13.7
|
25.1
|
Grade (g/t
Au)
|
0.36
|
3.91
|
2.29
|
Au (koz)
|
131.2
|
1,719.9
|
1,851.1
|
Inferred(8)
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
0.2
|
21.5
|
21.7
|
Grade (g/t
Au)
|
0.87
|
3.57
|
3.55
|
Au (koz)
|
4.8
|
2,470.4
|
2,475.2
|
1.
|
CIM definitions were
followed for Mineral Resources.
|
2.
|
The effective date of
the estimate is August 11, 2016.
|
3.
|
Mineral Resources are
exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
|
4.
|
Density data was
established on a per zone basis and ranges from 2.72 to 3.26
g/cm3.
|
5.
|
In-pit Mineral
Resources are estimated within the Pit Design shell.
Parameters included (all amounts in Canadian dollars): reference
mining cost: $1.80/t, incremental bench cost ($/10 m bench):
$0.030/t, milling cost: $7.46/t, royalty: 3%, G&A: $1.42/t,
rehandling: $0.12/t, sustaining capital: $0.60/t, gold price:
$1,625/oz, milling recovery: 90%, pit slope: 55°.
|
6.
|
Mineral resources
that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
|
7.
|
Numbers may not add
due to rounding.
|
8.
|
Inferred mineral
resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence
and as to whether they can be mined economically. It cannot
be assumed that all or part of the inferred resources will ever be
converted to a higher category.
|
Mineral Reserves
Mineral reserves are based on indicated mineral resources within a
designed pit, and generated using Feasibility Study parameters for
gold price, exchange rate, metallurgical recovery, dilution, mine
design criteria, and operating costs. This generated an
estimated probable mineral reserve of 142 million tonnes with an
average grade of 1.02 g/t gold, containing 4.7 million ounces of
gold at a cut-off grade of 0.33 g/t gold, as shown in Table 6.
Table 6: Open Pit Mineral Reserve
Estimate(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
Category
|
Diluted(7) Ore
Tonnage (Mt)
|
Diluted(7) Gold
Grade
(g/t Au)
|
Contained Gold
(koz Au)
|
Proven
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Probable
|
141.7
|
1.02
|
4,647
|
Total
|
141.7
|
1.02
|
4,647
|
1.
|
CIM definitions were
followed for Mineral Reserves.
|
2.
|
Mineral Reserves are
estimated at a cut-off grade of 0.33 g Au/t.
|
3.
|
Mineral Reserves are
estimated using a long-term gold price of USD 1,250/oz and an
exchange rate of CAD/USD 1.30.
|
4.
|
A minimum mining
width of 5 metre was used.
|
5.
|
Bulk density of ore
is variable but averages 2.83 t/m3.
|
6.
|
The average strip
ratio is 3.87:1.
|
7.
|
Mining dilution
factor is 17.3%.
|
Mining
The Feasibility Study proposes conventional
open pit mining techniques with 10 metre benches using hydraulic
shovels. The open pit operation is planned to be owner
operated, with outsourcing of certain support activities.
Production drilling will be by blast hole drill rigs with both
rotary and down-the-hole ("DTH") drilling capability.
Drilling of 203 mm blast holes will be undertaken on a 6.0 m x 6.5
m pattern with one metre of sub-drill. The majority of the
loading in the pit will be carried out by three hydraulic face
shovels, two 26 m3 and one 19 m3 and two
front-end wheel loaders (21 m3). The shovels and
loaders will be matched with a fleet of 181 tonne payload mine
trucks. As the open pit is recovering resources from past
producing underground mines, the presence of mined-out stopes was
considered when designing the pits. Most of the underground
openings are backfilled with sand fill or rock fill.
Mining of the Hardrock main pit will occur in four phases with a
single phase for the smaller satellite pit to the east. Waste
rock will be disposed of in four distinct waste dumps with three
located around the pit and one further to the south. The open
pit generates 548.9 million tonnes of overburden and waste rock
(inclusive of historic tailings and underground backfill) for a
strip ratio of 3.87:1.
The key yearly mining metrics are outlined in Table 7.
Metallurgy & Processing
Metallurgical testing
spanned a period of four years and included mineralogy,
grindability, and gold recovery testwork performed by third party
consultants.
The processing options for the Project were selected based on
the results of this testwork and are well known technologies that
are currently used in the mining industry. The gold recovery
process consists of a crushing circuit (gyratory and cone), a
grinding circuit (high pressure grinding roll (HPGR) and ball
mill), pre-leach thickening, a leach and carbon-in-pulp (CIP)
circuit, cyanide destruction and tailings disposal, carbon elution
and electrowinning, carbon regeneration and a gold refinery.
The HPGR is designed to be energy efficient compared to other
conventional comminution methods particularly when the ore is
extremely competent. HPGR is expected to assist in reducing
GGM's operating costs and providing consistent predictable mill
tonnage throughput.
The processing plant is designed to operate at a throughput of
27,000 tonnes per day and the mill operation schedule is 24 hours
per day, 365 days per year, with an overall availability of
92%. The initial milling rate is expected to be 24,000 tonnes
per day in Year 1 and 2, which reflects the processing of high
grade material in Year 2, increasing to 27,000 tonnes per day from
Year 3 onward.
The yearly processing metrics are included in Table 7.
Table 7: Hardrock Project Life-of-Mine Mining and Processing
Plan Metrics
|
Mining
|
Processing
|
|
Year
|
Ore
Mined
(Mt)
|
Grade
(g/t)
|
Contained
Gold
(koz)
|
Waste
Mined
(Mt)
|
Total
Mined
(Mt)
|
Ore
Milled
(Mt)
|
Grade (g/t)
|
Contained
Gold
(koz)
|
Recovered
Gold
(koz)
|
|
|
-1
|
4.8
|
1.07
|
166
|
17.5
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
10.3
|
0.97
|
323
|
41.5
|
51.8
|
5.3
|
1.15
|
195
|
176
|
|
2
|
9.3
|
1.01
|
301
|
59.2
|
68.5
|
8.8
|
1.59
|
447
|
409
|
|
3
|
13.4
|
1.01
|
436
|
54.8
|
68.2
|
9.9
|
1.25
|
396
|
358
|
|
4
|
11.0
|
1.09
|
385
|
56.4
|
67.5
|
9.9
|
1.22
|
387
|
349
|
|
5
|
8.8
|
1.12
|
315
|
59.2
|
67.9
|
9.9
|
1.08
|
342
|
308
|
|
6
|
8.0
|
1.01
|
258
|
56.5
|
64.5
|
9.9
|
0.88
|
280
|
252
|
|
7
|
13.5
|
0.98
|
423
|
48.9
|
62.4
|
9.9
|
1.20
|
382
|
346
|
|
8
|
9.3
|
0.86
|
258
|
43.5
|
52.8
|
9.9
|
0.84
|
265
|
238
|
|
9
|
10.4
|
0.90
|
301
|
37.5
|
47.9
|
9.9
|
0.93
|
296
|
266
|
|
10
|
12.2
|
1.04
|
407
|
27.6
|
39.8
|
9.9
|
1.20
|
380
|
344
|
|
11
|
12.0
|
1.00
|
386
|
21.7
|
33.8
|
9.9
|
1.14
|
360
|
326
|
|
12
|
10.5
|
1.13
|
380
|
13.9
|
24.4
|
9.9
|
1.18
|
373
|
336
|
|
13
|
5.4
|
1.14
|
197
|
8.5
|
13.8
|
9.9
|
0.78
|
249
|
223
|
|
14
|
2.9
|
1.18
|
110
|
2.4
|
5.3
|
9.9
|
0.60
|
190
|
169
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
0.36
|
107
|
92
|
|
Total
|
141.7
|
1.02
|
4,647
|
548.9
|
690.6
|
141.7
|
1.02
|
4,647
|
4,193
|
|
The tailings management facility ("TMF") is planned to be
located approximately 5 kilometres southwest of the processing
plant site with a design capacity of 145 million tonnes.
Several experts were involved in evaluating various location
scenarios. The proposed location was selected following a
detailed analysis of options that considered environmental,
technical, economic, and socio-economic selection criteria.
Infrastructure
The Feasibility Study contemplates that
existing infrastructure within the footprint of the Project limits
will require relocation, including the Trans-Canada Highway Route
11, an existing Hydro One substation, the OPP Police station, a gas
station, and other properties. The relocation plans have been
discussed with the related parties and discussions are
continuing.
The existing Hydro One grid is insufficient for powering the
processing facilities and associated infrastructure. A 65 MW
natural gas-fired power plant will be constructed which will
include a natural gas pipeline originating from the existing
TransCanada PipeLines Limited Canadian Mainline pipeline directly
to the site power plant.
Capital Costs
The initial capital costs of
$1.25 billion during the
pre-production period include all direct and indirect costs for the
processing plant and related infrastructure, relocation of existing
facilities, mining equipment, and mining during the pre-production
period. The capital expenditure estimate base date is the end
of the second quarter 2016, and has been developed assuming an
owner-managed execution strategy. The peak construction and
mining workforce is estimated at 850 during the two-year
construction period. The breakdown of initial capital costs
is provided in Table 8.
Table 8: Initial Capital Cost
Initial Capital
Cost
|
Total Costs
($ M)
|
Infrastructure
|
63
|
Power &
Electrical
|
72
|
Water & Tailings
Management
|
80
|
Mobile
Equipment
|
178
|
Infrastructure
Relocation
|
46
|
Process
Plant
|
343
|
Construction Indirect
Costs
|
175
|
General Services –
Owner's Cost
|
60
|
Preproduction, Start
up, Commissioning
|
94
|
Contingency
|
131
|
Total Initial
Construction Capital Cost
|
1,242
|
Other Initial Capital
Costs
|
5
|
Total Initial
Capital Cost
|
1,247
|
Sustaining capital1 required during the LOM
operations for additional mine equipment purchases, mine equipment
capital repairs, mine civil works, tailings dam raises, and
additional infrastructure relocation is estimated in the
Feasibility Study at $257
million.
Operating Costs
The average operating cost is
$705 per ounce or $20.95 per tonne milled over the LOM. The
all-in sustaining cost1, which includes royalties,
closure, reclamation, and sustaining capital1 costs,
averages $780 per ounce sold.
The operations workforce peaks at 550 employees. Table
9 presents the LOM operating costs.
Table 9 Life-of-Mine Operating Cost Summary
Category
|
Total Costs
($ M)
|
Unit Cost
($/t milled)
|
Cost per
oz ($/oz
Au)
|
Mining
|
1,412
|
10.03
|
338
|
Processing
|
1,061
|
7.54
|
254
|
General &
Administrative Expenses
|
205
|
1.45
|
49
|
Transportation &
Refining
|
13
|
0.09
|
3
|
Royalties and
Other(2)
|
259
|
1.84
|
62
|
Total Operating
Cost
|
2,950
|
20.95
|
705
|
Closure &
Reclamation
|
54
|
0.38
|
13
|
Sustaining
Capital(1)
|
257
|
1.82
|
61
|
All-in Sustaining
Cost(1)
|
3,261
|
23.16
|
780
|
(1)
|
Non-GAAP
measure. See "Non-GAAP Measures".
|
(2)
|
A 3% net smelter
royalty ("NSR") is payable to Franco-Nevada Corporation.
|
Permitting
GGM has worked closely with federal and
provincial authorities to meet environmental regulatory
requirements. To support the regulatory submission, GGM has
carried out a multi-year field program to characterize the
environmental baseline conditions. Milestones have included
the acceptance of the Project Description and the provision of the
EIS Guidelines by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.
In addition, the Provincial Terms of Reference was approved
by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.
GGM submitted a draft Environmental Impact Study/Environmental
Assessment ("EIS/EA") in February
2016 and received comments from the various provincial and
federal regulatory agencies, as well as from other stakeholders.
The comments received related primarily to the location and
management of the tailings storage, the management and location of
the waste rock storage areas, and potential effects to water
quality. Responses to the comments will be incorporated into
the final EIS/EA submission scheduled to be made at the end of the
first quarter of 2017.
Community
GGM is committed to ongoing outreach
activities to provide local stakeholders, government agencies, and
affected aboriginal communities an understanding of the Project.
The Company engages in periodic public and community
information meetings and regular communication with its
stakeholders to discuss the Project and to obtain
feedback.
Next Steps
The Company expects to continue to evaluate
programs to de-risk the Project by advancing the following
activities throughout 2017:
- Submission of the final EA/EIA;
- Advance permitting activities;
- Continue consultation with community and First Nations
stakeholders;
- Advance negotiations for Long Term Benefit Arrangement
Agreements with First Nations communities; and
- Continue to advance discussions relating to project
financing.
Technical Report
A technical report for the Hardrock
Project will be prepared in accordance with National Instrument
43-101 and will be filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the
Company's websites within 45 days.
Material Assumptions & Risks
Material assumptions
or factors that have been used in the Mineral Reserve and Mineral
Resource estimates and the Hardrock Project Feasibility Study and
LOM plan include the following:
- a gold price of USD $1,250
per ounce,
- an exchange rates of 1.30
C$/US$
Other important assumptions (and corresponding risks) that are
implicit in the GGM's Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource
estimates and the Hardrock Project Feasibility Study and LOM plan
are as follows:
- all necessary permits, licenses, and approvals, including the
EA/EIS, are received in a timely manner,
- ore tonnes, grade and metallurgical recoveries at the Hardrock
Project will remain consistent with the LOM plan to achieve the
forecast gold production,
- tax and royalty rates will remain at current levels for the
life of the Hardrock Project,
- GGM will have sufficient uninterrupted power and water supply
during operations,
- no unplanned delays in or interruption of scheduled production
at the Hardrock Project, including due to labour disruptions, civil
unrest, natural phenomena, regulatory or political disputes,
equipment breakdown, or other developmental and operational risks,
and
- the Hardrock LOM plan does not make allowance for inflation,
changes in exchange rates and movements in gold prices.
Production and cost forecasts and capital estimates are
forward-looking information and are based on key assumptions and
subject to material risk factors.
Technical Teach-in
Date: Wednesday, November 16,
2016
Time: 5:00pm (EDT)
Place: Toronto Board of Trade -
Ridout room
Webcast
Link: please click the below link to access the teach-in via
webcast.
http://event.on24.com/r.htm?e=1308017&s=1&k=781CC2E1C111E0B6BDBAB7DBA0951279
Conference Call
Toll Free Dial-In Number: 1-(888)
231-8191
International Dial-In Number: 1-(647) 427-7450
This conference call will be available for 1 month following the
event
Playback Toll Free Dial-in Number: 1-(855) 859-2056
Playback International Dial-in Number: 1-(416) 849-0833
Passcode: 15469730
Qualified Person & QA/QC
The Feasibility Study was
completed by G Mining Services Inc. with the assistance of several
external consultants. Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource
estimates, LOM plan, and other scientific and technical information
in this news release were prepared in accordance with the standards
of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum and
National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects ("NI 43-101") and were prepared or supervised by Mr.
Réjean Sirois, Vice-President of Geology and Resources for G Mining
Services Inc., and Mr. Louis-Pierre
Gignac, Co-President of G Mining Services Inc., both of whom
are "Qualified Person" as defined by National Instrument 43-101 –
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").
Sample preparation, analytical techniques, laboratories used
and quality assurance-quality control protocols used during the
exploration drilling programs on the Hardrock Project have been
done consistent with industry standards and independent certified
assay labs have been used. Available quality control data
indicates that the gold assay data used for resource estimation are
reliable.
Non-GAAP Measures
This news release contains the
following non-GAAP financial measures: all-in sustaining costs and
sustaining capital. These financial measures do not have any
standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and are therefore unlikely
to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers,
even as compared to other issuers who may be applying the World
Gold Council ("WGC") guidelines, which can be found at
http://www.gold.org.
The Partnership believes that the use of these non-GAAP measures
will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders in
understanding the costs associated with producing gold,
understanding the economics of gold mining and the ability of the
project to generate free cash flow. However, the measures do have
limitations as analytical tools as they may be influenced by the
point in the life cycle of a specific mine and the level of
additional exploration or expenditures a company has to make to
fully develop the property. Accordingly, these non-GAAP
measures should not be considered in isolation.
Definitions
The following is a description of
the non-GAAP measures used in this news release. The definitions
are similar to the WGC's Guidance Note on these non-GAAP
measures:
- Sustaining capital is a capital expenditure necessary to
maintain levels of production. The sustaining capital expenditures
include maintaining the mine fleet, mill and other facilities so
that they function at levels consistent from year-to-year.
- All-in sustaining costs per ounce include all operating
costs, royalties, general and administrative expenses, sustaining
capital, closure and reclamation costs.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking
Information
Information contained in this news release and
the documents referred to herein which are not statements of
historical facts, may be "forward-looking information" for the
purposes of Canadian securities laws. Such forward looking
information involves risks, uncertainties and other factors that
could cause actual results, performance, prospects and
opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied
by such forward looking information. The words "expect",
"target", "estimate", "may", "will", and similar expressions
identify forward-looking information. These forward-looking
statements relate to, among other things, mineral reserve and
resource estimates, grades and recoveries, the evaluation of
programs to minimize the risk profile of the Project including the
submission of the final EA/EIA to regulators in support of mining
continued consultations with community and First Nations
stakeholders and advancing discussions relating to project
financing; development plans, mining methods and metrics including
strip ratio, recovery process and the expected performance of the
HPGR, mining and production expectations including expected cash
flows, capital cost estimates and expected LOM operating costs, the
expected payback period, receipt of government approvals and
licenses including the timing for submitting a response to the
EA/EIA, time frame for construction, financial forecasts including
net present value and internal rate of return estimates, tax and
royalty rates, expected costs relating to the relocation of certain
existing infrastructure, opportunities to improve the LOM average
grade from processing material from other Greenstone Gold Property,
including Brookbank and the Hardrock underground; and the
possibility of any benefit of historical tax positions held by
Centerra or Premier.
Forward-looking information is necessarily based upon a number
of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by
the Managing Partner, Centerra and Premier, are inherently subject
to significant political, business, economic and competitive
uncertainties and contingencies. There may be factors that
cause results, assumptions, performance, achievements, prospects or
opportunities in future periods not to be as anticipated, estimated
or intended. These factors include the following risks
relating to the Hardrock Project, Centerra and/or Premier:
(A) strategic, legal, planning and other risks, including the
risks for disagreement between the partners on how to explore,
develop, operate and finance the Project, political risk, risks
relating to aboriginal claims and consultation issues; resource
nationalism including the management of external stakeholder
expectations; the impact of changes in, or to the more aggressive
enforcement of laws, regulations and government practices; the
impact of changes to, the increased enforcement of, environmental
laws and regulations; potential defects of title to the property
that are not known as of the date hereof; the inability of the
Partnership and its partners to enforce their respective legal
rights in certain circumstances; risks related to anti-corruption
legislation; potential risks related to kidnapping or acts of
terrorism; (B) risks relating to financial matters, including the
ability of the partners to provide funding to the Partnership in
accordance with the terms of the Partnership Agreement; sensitivity
of the business to the volatility of gold prices; the
imprecision of mineral reserves and resources estimates; and the
assumptions they rely on; the accuracy of the production and cost
estimates; the ability to obtain financing for the Partnership or
by either partner; the impact of global financial conditions, the
impact of currency fluctuations, the effect of market conditions
on short-term investments, the ability of the partners
including Centerra to make payments to the Partnership depends on
the cash flow of its subsidiaries; and (C) risks related to
operational matters and geotechnical issues; the success of the
Partnership's future exploration and development activities,
including the financial and political risks inherent in carrying
out exploration activities; inherent risks associated with the use
of sodium cyanide in the mining operations; the adequacy of
insurance to mitigate operational risks; mechanical breakdowns; the
occurrence of any labour unrest or disturbance; the ability to
accurately predict decommissioning and reclamation costs, including
closure costs; the ability to attract and retain qualified
personnel; the ability to manage projects effectively and to
mitigate the potential lack of availability of contractors; budget
and timing overruns and project resources; potential delays in the
issuance of permits; potential opposition to the Hardrock Project
by local communities or civil groups related; potential material
increases in project development or operation costs due to
increases in key consumables, inflation, imposed demands for
infrastructure development or regulatory changes; the planning,
design and costing of the key project infrastructure such as power,
water and access.
There can be no assurances that forward-looking information and
statements will prove to be accurate, as many factors and future
events, both known and unknown could cause actual results,
performance or achievements to vary or differ materially, from the
results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements contained herein or
incorporated by reference. Accordingly, all such factors
should be considered carefully when making decisions with respect
to Centerra/Premier, and prospective investors should not place
undue reliance on forward-looking information.
Forward-looking information is as of November 16, 2016. Centerra/Premier assumes
no obligation to update or revise forward-looking information to
reflect changes in assumptions, changes in circumstances or any
other events affecting such forward looking information, except as
required by applicable law.
About Centerra
Centerra Gold Inc. is a Canadian-based
gold mining company focused on operating, developing, exploring and
acquiring gold properties in North
America, Asia and other
markets worldwide. Centerra is the largest Western-based gold
producer in Central Asia and
operates the Kumtor mine in the Kyrgyz
Republic and the Mount Milligan mine in British Columbia, Canada. Centerra's
shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the symbol
CG. The Company is based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
About Premier
Premier Gold Mines Limited is a
gold producer and respected exploration and development company
with a high-quality pipeline of precious metal projects in proven,
accessible and safe mining jurisdictions in Canada, the United
States, and Mexico.
________________________________
1 Non-GAAP measure, see discussion under "Non-GAAP
Measures".
SOURCE Premier Gold Mines Limited