This prospectus relates
to the resale of up to 30,000,000 shares of our common stock to be offered by the selling stockholder, GHS Investments, LLC (“GHS”).
These 30,000,000 shares of common stock consist of up to 30,000,000 shares of common stock issuable to GHS under the terms of a
Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 27, 2018.
Our registration of the shares
of common stock covered by this prospectus does not mean that the selling stockholder will offer or sell any of such shares of
common stock. The selling stockholder may sell the shares of common stock covered by this prospectus in a number of different ways
and at varying prices. For additional information on the possible methods of sale that may be used by the selling stockholders,
you should refer to the section of this prospectus entitled “Plan of Distribution”. We will not receive any of the
proceeds from the sale of common stock by the selling stockholders.
GHS is an underwriter within
the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares may be deemed
to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with such sales. In such event,
any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed
to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act of 1933. We will bear all costs, expenses and fees in connection
with the registration of the common stock. The selling stockholder will bear all commissions and discounts, if any, attributable
to its sales of our common stock.
Our common stock is quoted
on the OTCQB tier of the electronic over-the-counter marketplace operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. On May 8, 2019, the last reported
sales price for our common stock was $0.073 per share.
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights
information contained elsewhere in this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that you should consider in making
your investment decision. Before investing in our common stock, you should carefully read this entire prospectus, including our
financial statements and the related notes and the information set forth under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in each case included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Unless
the context otherwise requires, references to “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company”
in this prospectus mean Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. on a consolidated basis with its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Rocky Mountain High Brands,
Inc.
Overview
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc. is a Nevada corporation. RMHB currently operates through its parent company, three wholly-owned subsidiaries
and one minority-owned subsidiary, which the Company controls. All subsidiaries are consolidated for financial reporting purposes:
|
•
|
Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc., an active Nevada corporation
(Parent)
|
|
•
|
Wellness For Life Colorado, Inc. (“WFLC”) (f/k/a Rocky
Mountain Hemp Company and Wellness For Life, Inc.), an active Colorado corporation (Subsidiary)
|
|
•
|
Eagle Spirit Land & Water Company (“Eagle Spirit”),
an active Oklahoma corporation (Subsidiary)
|
|
•
|
Rocky Mountain High Water Company, LLC (“WaterCo”),
an active Delaware limited liability
company
(Subsidiary-consolidated beginning November
12, 2016)
|
|
•
|
FitWhey Brands Inc. (“FitWhey”), an active Nevada corporation
(Subsidiary)
|
|
•
|
Rocky Mountain High Clothing Company, Inc., an inactive Texas Corporation
(Subsidiary)
|
|
•
|
Smarterita, LLC, an inactive Texas limited liability company (Subsidiary)
|
RMHB is a lifestyle brand
management company that markets primarily CBD and hemp-infused products to health-conscious consumers. Our products span various
categories including beverage, food, fitness, and skin care. RMHB also markets a naturally high alkaline spring water and a water-based
protein drink with caffeine and B vitamins. All products comply with federal regulations on hemp products and contain 0.0% tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC), the psychoactive constituent of cannabis.
In March 2018, the Company
launched the HEMPd brand with gummies, water soluble drops, capsules, tinctures, lotions, and salves. The Company introduced four
flavors of CBD-infused waters in 12 oz. cans in November 2018.
In July 2018, the Company
acquired the assets of BFIT Brands, LLC and formed a new subsidiary, FitWhey Brands LLC. FitWhey markets a line-up of five water-based
protein drinks that include caffeine and B vitamins.
During 2017 and 2018,
the Company continued to market its lineup of naturally flavored hemp-infused functional beverages, as well as hemp-infused 2oz.
Mango Energy Shots and Mixed Berry Energy Shots through the first half of 2018. The Company plans to introduce updated offerings
of hemp seed extract-infused functional beverages in the second quarter of 2019 under the name of Rocky Mountain.
Corporate History
Rocky Mountain High Brands
Inc. October 23, 2014 to present – Articles of Amendment filed with the State of Nevada f/k/a Totally Hemp Crazy Inc.
July
17, 2014 to October 23, 2014 – Articles of Amendment filed with the State of Nevada
f/k/a Republic of Texas
Brands Incorporated November 2011 to July 17, 2014 – Articles of Amendment filed with the State of Nevada
f/k/a Legends Food Corporation
May 2011 to November 2011 – Articles of Amendment filed with the State of Nevada
f/k/a Precious Metals Exchange Corp. –
Articles of Amendment filed with the State of Nevada on December 23, 2008
f/k/a Stealth Industries,
Inc. – Articles of Amendment filed with the State of Minnesota on October 25, 1999 (name change). Articles of Incorporation
filed with the State of Nevada on October 30, 2000 (Change of Domicile; Merger with Stealth Industries, Inc. (Minnesota)
f/k/a Assisted Living Corporation
– Articles of Amendment filed with the State of Minnesota on November 3, 1993 (name change) f/k/a Electric Reel Corporation
of America, Inc. -- Articles of Incorporation filed with the State of Minnesota on August 15, 1968
Acquisitions
Rocky Mountain High Water Company
LLC
In July 2016, the Company
entered into a business alliance with Poafpybitty Family, LLC to launch Eagle Spirit Spring Water, a line of purified, high-alkaline
spring water sourced from Native American tribal land in Oklahoma.
The agreement calls for
the Company to pay a royalty on each gallon of water collected at the spring. Production of filtered spring water filled bottles
commenced in August 2016 and sales began in October 2016.
In consideration for the 20-year
water and surface rights, and a related 10-year renewal option, the Company paid Poafpybitty Family, LLC cash payments of $22,500
and issued a warrant for 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $.03 per share over a three-year period
beginning July 27, 2016.
The agreement grants the Company
an exclusive right to develop land adjacent to the spring for commercial purposes as agreed to by both parties. Additionally, the
Company has agreed to grow hemp for experimental or commercial purposes on the land within three years.
On November 12, 2016, the
agreement with the Poafpybitty Family was amended to give the Company a controlling voting interest of 75% of WaterCo, while
the Poafpybitty Family received a majority 51% of the equity interest. The amended agreement is being accounted for as a
step-acquisition, with the resulting goodwill of $59,163 included in other assets. During the six months ended December 31,
2017, the Company obtained an outside valuation of the rights to use the land and obtain the water described in the
agreement. As a result of that analysis and the continued operating losses by the Company’s spring water business, the
Company determined that its investment, including the related goodwill, was fully impaired. The Company recorded an
impairment expense of $59,163 as of November 12, 2017. As a result of the step-acquisition, beginning on November 12, 2016
the operations of WaterCo are consolidated in the financial statements of RMHB.
FitWhey Brands Inc. (acquisition
of the assets of BFIT Brands, LLC)
In July 2018, the Company
purchased the assets of BFIT Brands, LLC, an Arizona-based company. The acquired assets include the cash, accounts receivable,
inventory, FitWhey software, trademark, and formulas of BFIT’s FitWhey branded water-based protein drinks containing caffeine
and a vitamin-B pack. The Company paid $230,438 including common stock issued to the owners of BFIT of $75,000, forgiveness of
a note receivable of $80,000 plus accrued interest of $438, and $75,000 to be paid to the owners of BFIT over time based on 5%
of net sales of FitWhey products. The acquisition includes $98,297 of assets including cash, accounts receivable, inventory, and
prepaid production costs and $132,141 of intangible assets, including the FitWhey software, trademark, formulas, and goodwill.
The Company is obtaining an outside valuation of these assets.
Our Transactions with GHS
Secured Promissory
Notes
We have eight Secured Promissory
Notes issued and outstanding to GHS in the amounts set forth below. The Notes bear interest at an annual rate of ten percent (10%),
and are secured by all of our assets. A summary of the Notes as currently issued, the amounts due as of May 3, 2019 and due dates
of the Notes are as follows:
Note
|
Principal
Amount Owing
|
Accrued
Interest Owing
|
Due
Date
|
First
Note (issued Jul 24, 2018)
|
$157,500.00
|
$13,894.52
|
December
1, 2019
|
Second
Note (issued August 9, 2018)
|
$157,500.00
|
$13,204.11
|
January
1, 2020
|
Third
Note (issued August 30, 2018)
|
$105,000.00
|
$8,198.63
|
February
1, 2020
|
Fourth
Note (issued September 14, 2018)
|
$131,250.00
|
$9,708.90
|
March
1, 2020
|
Fifth
Note (issued September 28, 2018)
|
$55,000.00
|
$3,797.26
|
March
1, 2020
|
Sixth
Note (issued October 12, 2018)
|
$52,500.00
|
$3,480.82
|
April
1, 2020
|
Seventh
Note (issued May 3, 2019)
|
$105,000.00
|
$1,121.92
|
February
3, 2020
|
Eighth
Note (issued May 16, 2019)
|
$157,500.00
|
$1,121.92
|
February
16, 2020
|
Ninth
Note (issued June 7, 2019)
|
$105,000.00
|
$115.07
|
February
16, 2020
|
Totals
|
$1,026,250.00
|
$54,643.15
|
March
7, 2020
|
Events of default under the
Notes include: (i) failure to pay installments when due, (ii) failure to timely deliver shares of common stock in the event that
we
have elected such conversion and sent notice of such to GHS, (iii) breach of representations
or warranties made in the Notes, (iv) receivership, bankruptcy, or liquidation, (v) our failure to comply with the reporting requirements
of the Exchange Act, and (vi) failure to maintain OTC quotation of our common stock.
In the event of our default,
the GHS Note will bear interest at an annual rate of 20% and the balances due under the Notes will be accelerated. Further, a
default penalty of 50% will apply to the outstanding balances and GHS may, as a secured creditor, enforce its lien on our assets
and liquidate them under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. The Notes are not currently in default. The Notes are convertible
at prices ranging from $0.03 to $0.05 per share. GHS’s ability to convert the Notes is limited such that: (i) no conversion
may be effected to the extent that, following such conversion, GHS would own more that 9.99% of our issued and outstanding common
stock; and (ii) for so long as we are not in default under any of the Notes, GHS may not convert, in any calendar month, any portion
of a Note in excess of $50,000. In addition, for so long as we are not in default under any of the Notes, GHS may not, on any
individual trading day, re-sell an amount of shares of common stock received upon conversion of all Notes that is in excess of
fifteen percent (15%) of the total trading volume for such trading day.
Securities Purchase Agreement
With GHS
On June 27, 2018, we entered into
a Securities Purchase Agreement with GHS which provides for GHS’s purchase of up to $15,000,000 worth of our common stock
(the “SPA”). We have previously registered for resale 16,000,000 shares of common stock to be purchased by GHS under
the SPA. To date, we have put a total of 16,000,000 shares to GHS under the SPA for total proceeds to us of approximately $2,194,349.
We are now registering for resale
by GHS up to 30,000,000 additional shares of common stock to be purchased by GHS under the SPA. Under the SPA, GHS has agreed to
purchase up to $15,000,000 worth of our common stock over a period of twenty-four (24) months. Sales of common stock to GHS under
SPA shall be initiated from time to time by our issuance of individual Put Notices to GHS. The price of shares put to GHS under
each Put Notice shall be eighty-two (82%) percent of the “Market Price,” which is the lowest traded price of our common
stock during the ten (10) consecutive trading days preceding the date of the Put Notice. However, in the event that (i) the lowest
volume-weighted average price (“VWAP”) of our common stock for any given trading day during the ten (10) trading days
following a Put Notice (the “Trading Period”) is less than 82% of the Market Price used to determine the Purchase Price
in connection with the Put and (ii) as of the end of such Trading Period, GHS still holds shares issued pursuant to such Put Notice
(the “Trading Period Shares”), then we will be required to issue such additional shares of common stock, on the trading
day immediately following the Trading Period, as may be necessary to adjust the Purchase Price for that portion of the Put represented
by the Trading Period Shares to equal the lowest VWAP during the Trading Period.
The amount and timing of each Put
Notice will be subject to certain limitations: (i) a new Put Notice may not be issued until the prior put has closed, (ii) there
must be a
minimum
of eight (8) trading days between each Put Notice, (iii) no Put
Notice will be effective to the extent that, following the closing of the put, GHS and its affiliates would own more than 9.99%
of our common stock; (iv) the
maximum
dollar amount of each put will not exceed
two
times (2x) the average of the daily trading dollar volume for our common stock during the ten (10) trading days preceding
the put date; and (v) no put will be made in an amount greater than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000).
Our ability to use the SPA facility
is conditioned upon, among other things, the effectiveness of a registration statement registering the resale by GHS of the shares
of common stock issuable under the SPA. Our obligations in this regard are governed by a Registration Rights Agreement with GHS
dated June 27, 2018 (the “RRA”). The RRA requires us to file a Registration Statement for GHS’s resale of the
Registrable Securities with thirty (30) days, and to use our best efforts to secure effectiveness of the Registration Statement
with ninety (90) days after filing. Once the Registration Statement is effective, we are required to maintain its effectiveness,
by appropriate amendments and/or prospectus supplements, until the earlier to occur of the following: (A) GHS has sold all the
Registrable Securities; or (B) GHS has no right to acquire any additional shares of common stock under the SPA.
A total of 30,000,000 shares
issuable under the SPA are being offered under this Prospectus. At a price of $0.04264 (82% of our market price as of June 11,
2019), a sale of all of these shares to GHS would represent total proceeds to us of $1,279,200. Our actual sale prices to GHS,
however, will be determined by reference to the trading price of our common stock in the market, with GHS receiving a discount
from the market trading price as indicated above. Because market prices of our common stock are subject to constant fluctuations,
the actual amount to be received by us upon sale of the 30,000,000 shares being offered could vary substantially from the listed
offering amount for shares issuable under the SPA. If our stock price were to decrease, the total proceeds available to us upon
sale of the shares being offered under this Prospectus could correspondingly decrease substantially. Please see “Future
Liquidity Requirements” on page 20 for an illustration of the total proceeds which would be received under a range of assumed
trading prices.
Our principal executive offices
are located at 9101 LBJ Freeway, Suite 200, Dallas, TX 75243. Our telephone number is (800) 260-9062. The Company’s website
address is
http://www.rockymountainhighbrands.com
. Information contained on the Company’s website is not incorporated
into this prospectus. Annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments
to those reports are available free of charge through the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) website at
http://www.sec.gov
as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. These reports are
also available on the Company’s website.
Summary of the
Offering
Common stock offered by the selling shareholder
|
|
30,000,000 shares
of common stock, consisting of up to 30,000,000 shares of common stock issuable to GHS under the terms of a Securities Purchase
Agreement dated June 27, 2018.
|
|
|
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering
|
|
135,061,000
shares,
assuming all shares issuable to GHS under the Securities Purchase Agreement are issued by us
.
|
|
|
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock offered by the selling stockholders.
|
|
|
|
Risk factors
|
|
See “Risk Factors” beginning on page
9
of this prospectus and the other information included in this prospectus for a discussion
of factors you should carefully consider before investing in our securities.
|
|
|
|
OTCQB trading symbol
|
|
RMHB
|
Unless we indicate otherwise,
all information in this prospectus is based on 105,598,650 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of May 8, 2019, and
excludes shares issuable upon conversion of convertible notes and shares issuable upon the conversion of outstanding warrants
and options.
RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common
stock involves a high degree of risk. Prospective investors should carefully consider the risks described below and other information
contained in this prospectus, including our financial statements and related notes before purchasing shares of our common stock.
There are numerous and varied risks, known and unknown, that may prevent us from achieving our goals. If any of these risks actually
occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading
price of our common stock could decline and investors in our common stock could lose all or part of their investment.
We have a limited operating
history and operate in a new industry, and we may not succeed.
The hemp oil and beverage businesses
are highly competitive and risky, and competition from companies much bigger than us could adversely affect our operating results.
We compete with many national,
regional and local businesses. We could experience increased competition from existing or new companies in the hemp oil and beverage
channels, which could create increasing pressures to grow ours. If we are unable to maintain our competitive position, we could
experience downward pressure on prices, lower demand for our products, reduced margins, the inability to take advantage of new
business opportunities and the loss of channel share, which would have an adverse effect on our operating results. Other factors
that could affect our business are:
|
•
|
National, regional or local economic conditions
|
|
•
|
Disposable purchasing power
|
|
•
|
Demographic trends; and
|
|
•
|
The price of special ingredients that go into our products.
|
We may fail to successfully
implement our growth strategy, which includes direct-to-consumer as well as brick and mortar channels.
Our success as a national brand
requires that we successfully compete online through our proprietary websites, Amazon, and eBay and place our products in national
and local retailers through our distribution network. Failure to achieve sales in any of these areas will have an adverse effect
on our growth.
The hemp oil and beverage
industries are affected by consumer preferences and perceptions. Changes in these preferences and perceptions may lessen the demand
for our products, which would reduce sales and harm our business.
The hemp oil and beverage businesses
are affected by changes in consumer tastes, national, regional and local economic conditions, and demographic trends. If consumer
demand for our brand categories should decrease, our business would suffer.
Increases in the cost of ingredients
and raw materials could materially affect our operating results.
Our principal products contain
hemp oil. Increases in the cost of hemp oil as well as other ingredients such as natural sweeteners, or other raw materials such
as aluminum, which we use for our beverage cans, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Significant price
increases, market conditions, weather, acts of God and other disasters could materially affect our operating results.
Increases in ingredients,
raw materials, labor, and other costs could adversely affect our profitability and operating results.
An increase in our operating
costs could adversely affect our profitability. Factors such as inflation, poor hemp harvests, increased labor costs, and increased
energy costs may adversely affect our operating profits. Many of the factors affecting costs are beyond our control and we may
not be able to pass these increased costs along to our customers.
We do not have long-term contracts
with our suppliers, and as a result they could seek to significantly increase prices or fail to deliver.
We typically do not rely on
long-term arrangements with our suppliers. Although
we
have not experienced significant
problems with our suppliers, our suppliers may implement significant price increases or may not meet our requirements in a timely
fashion, if at all. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Any prolonged disruption in
the operations of any of our co-packing and fulfillment facilities could harm our business.
We generally operate through
co-packing agreements. All of our hemp oil-based gummies, capsules, tinctures, water soluble drops, lotions, and salves are produced
by co-packers in Colorado and direct-to-consumer orders are filled in Dallas. Our newly-formulated beverage products are co-packed
at third-party production facilities in the Dallas area. As a result, any prolonged disruption in the operations of any of these
facilities, whether due to technical or labor difficulties, destruction or damage to the facility, real estate issues or other
reasons, could result in increased costs and reduced revenues and our profitability and prospects could be harmed.
Loss
of key personnel or our inability to attract and retain new qualified personnel could hurt our business and inhibit our ability
to operate and grow successfully.
Our ability to successfully
grow our brands hinges on our ability to attract and retain professionals with talent, integrity, enthusiasm and loyalty. If we
are unable to attract or retain key personnel, our profitability and growth potential could be harmed.
We may not be able to
adequately protect our intellectual property, which could harm the value of our brands and branded products and adversely affect
our business.
We depend in large part on our
brands and branded products and believe that they are very important to our business, as well as on our proprietary hemp infused
processes. We rely on a combination of trademarks, copyrights, service marks, trade secrets and similar intellectual property rights
to protect our brand and branded products. The success of our business depends on our continued ability to use our existing trademarks
and service marks in order to increase brand awareness and further develop our branded products in both domestic and international
markets. We have registered certain trademarks and have other trademark registrations pending in the United States. We may not
be able to adequately protect our trademarks and our use of these trademarks may result in liability for trademark infringement,
trademark dilution or unfair competition. We may from time to time be required to institute litigation to enforce our trademarks
or other intellectual property rights, or to protect our trade secrets. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion
of resources and could negatively affect our sales, profitability and prospects regardless of whether
we
are able to successfully enforce our rights.
We are subject to extensive
government regulation, and our failure to comply with existing or increased regulations could adversely affect our business and
operating results. We are subject to numerous federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations, including those relating
to:
|
•
|
The production of beverages and other products
|
|
•
|
The preparation and sale of
food and
beverage products
|
|
•
|
Environmental protection
|
|
•
|
FDA and state agricultural requirements
|
|
•
|
The use of hemp, which is subject to federal regulations
|
|
•
|
Interstate commerce and taxation laws
|
|
•
|
Working and safety conditions,
minimum
wage and other labor requirements
|
Our annual and quarterly financial
results are subject to significant fluctuations depending on various factors, many of which are beyond our control, which could
adversely affect our ability to satisfy our debt obligations as they become due.
Our sales and operating results
can vary significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year depending on various factors, many of which are beyond our control.
These factors include:
|
•
|
Variations in the timing and volume of our sales
|
|
•
|
The timing of expenditures in anticipation of future sales
|
|
•
|
Sales promotions by us and our competitors
|
|
•
|
Changes in competitive and economic conditions generally
|
Consequently, our results of
operations may decline quickly and significantly in response to changes in order patterns or rapid decreases in demand for our
products. We anticipate that fluctuations in operating results will continue in the future. The Company's operating results may
vary. We may incur net losses. The Company expects to experience variability in its revenues and net income. While we intend to
implement our business plan to the fullest extent we can, we may experience net losses.
Factors expected to contribute
to this variability include, among other things:
|
•
|
The regulatory environment concerning hemp and food and beverage production
|
|
•
|
Climate, seasonality and environmental factors
|
|
•
|
Consumer demand for the Company’s products
|
|
•
|
Competition in products
|
You should further consider,
among other factors, our prospects for success in light of the risks and uncertainties encountered by companies that, like us,
are in their early stages. For example, unanticipated expenses, problems, and technical difficulties may occur and they may result
in material delays in the operation of our business, in particular with respect to our new products. We may not successfully address
these risks and uncertainties or successfully implement our operating strategies. If we fail to do so, it could materially harm
our business to the point of having to cease operations and could impair the value of our common stock to the point investors may
lose their entire investment.
These factors, among others,
raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.
We will require additional
capital to finance our operations in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed and could be dilutive
to existing stockholders.
We will require additional capital
for future operations. We estimate those requirements to approximate $1,500,000. We plan to finance operations and capital requirements
with funds generated from the following sources:
|
•
|
Capital raised through equity and debt offerings
|
|
•
|
Available cash and cash investments
|
|
•
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
Current conditions in the capital
markets are such that traditional sources of capital may not be available to us when needed or may be available only on unfavorable
terms. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions
and a number of other factors, many of which are outside our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly,
we
cannot assure you that
we
will be able to successfully raise additional capital
at all or on terms that are acceptable to us. If
we
cannot raise additional capital
when needed, it may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Further, if
we
raise capital by issuing stock, the holdings of our existing stockholders
will be diluted.
If we raise capital by issuing
debt securities, such debt securities would rank senior to our common stock upon our bankruptcy or liquidation. In addition, we
may raise capital by issuing equity securities that may be senior to our common stock for the purposes of dividend and liquidating
distributions, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Finally, upon bankruptcy or liquidation, holders
of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive a distribution of
our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of our existing
stockholders or reduce the market price of our common stock, or both.
Our stock price has been extremely
volatile and our common stock is not listed on a national stock exchange; as a result, stockholders may not be able to resell their
shares at or above the price paid for them.
The market price of our common
stock has been extremely volatile and could be subject to significant fluctuations due to changes in sentiment in the market regarding
our operations or business prospects, among other factors. Further, our common stock is not listed on a national stock exchange;
we intend to list the common stock on a national stock exchange once we meet the entry criteria. An active public market for our
common stock currently exists on the OTC Markets (www.otcmarkets.com) but may not be sustained. Therefore, stockholders may not
be able to sell their shares at or above the price they paid for them.
Among the factors that could
affect our stock price are:
|
•
|
Industry trends and the business success of our vendors
|
|
•
|
Actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial and operating results and operating results that vary from the expectations of our management or of securities analysts and investors
|
|
•
|
Our failure to meet the expectations of the investment community and changes in investment community recommendations or estimates of our future operating results
|
|
•
|
Announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions, dispositions, financings, product developments and other materials events by us or our competitors
|
|
•
|
Regulatory and legislative developments
|
|
•
|
General market conditions
|
|
•
|
Other domestic and international macroeconomic factors unrelated to our performance
|
|
•
|
Additions or departures of key personnel
|
Sales by our stockholders
of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could adversely affect the market price of our common
stock.
A substantial portion of our
total outstanding shares of common stock may be sold into the market at any time. Some of these shares are owned by executive officers
and directors, and
we
believe that such holders have no current intention to sell
a significant number of shares of our stock. If all of the major stockholders were to decide to sell large amounts of stock over
a short period of time such sales could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business
is doing well.
Our financial statements
may not be comparable to those of other companies.
Pursuant to Section 107(b) of
the JOBS Act,
we
have elected to use the extended transition period for complying
with new or revised accounting standards under Section 102(b)(2) of The JOBS Act. This election allows us to delay the adoption
of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards
apply to private companies. As a result, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company
effective dates, and our stockholders and potential investors may have difficulty in analyzing our operating results if comparing
us to such companies.
The success of our new and
existing products and services is uncertain
.
We have committed, and expect
to continue to commit, significant resources and capital to develop and market existing product enhancements and new products.
These products are relatively untested, and
we
cannot assure you that
we
will achieve market acceptance for these products, or other new products that
we
may
offer in the future. Moreover, these and other new products may be subject to significant competition with offerings by new and
existing competitors. In addition, new products and enhancements may pose a variety of technical challenges and require us to attract
additional qualified employees. The failure to successfully develop and market these new products or enhancements could seriously
harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is dependent
upon continued market acceptance by consumers
.
We are substantially dependent
on continued market acceptance of our products by consumers. Although
we
believe that
our products in the United States are gaining better consumer acceptance,
we
cannot
predict the future growth rate and size of this market.
If we are able to expand our
operations, we may be unable to successfully manage our future growth.
Since we initiated product sales
in 2015, we have added additional subsidiaries and product lines. These additions have placed substantial strain on our management,
operational, financial, and other resources. If we are able to continue expanding our operations in the United States and in other
countries where we believe our products will be successful, as planned, we may experience periods of rapid growth, which will require
additional resources. Any such growth could place increased strain on our management, operational, financial and other resources,
and we will need to train, motivate, and manage employees, as well as attract management, sales, finance and accounting, international,
technical, and other professionals. In addition, we will need to expand the scope of our infrastructure and our physical resources.
Any failure to expand these areas and implement appropriate procedures and controls in an efficient manner and at a pace consistent
with our business objectives could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Any future litigation could
have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, and financial condition and liquidity. The company holds Directors
& Officers insurance with a liability limit of $2,000,000, which may not be sufficient to cover a claim.
Despite our significant efforts
in quality control and preservation, we will face risks of litigation from customers, employees and others in the ordinary course
of business, which may divert our financial and management resources. Any adverse litigation or publicity may negatively impact
our financial condition and results of operations.
Claims of illness or injury
relating to food and beverage quality or handling are common in our industry. While
we
believe
our co-packer and fulfillment partners processes and high standards of quality control will minimize these instances, there is
always a risk of occurrence, and so despite our best efforts to regulate quality control, litigation may occur. In that event,
our financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be harmed.
From time to time we may be
subject to litigation, including potential stockholder derivative actions. Risks associated with legal liability are difficult
to assess and quantify, and their existence and magnitude can remain unknown for significant periods of time. The Company holds
Directors and Officers insurance with a liability limit of $2,000,000, which may not be sufficient to cover a potential claim.
While neither Nevada law nor our articles of incorporation or bylaws require us to indemnify or advance expenses to our officers
and directors involved in such a legal action, we expect that we would do so to the extent permitted by Nevada law.
Our prior operating results
may not be indicative of our future results.
You should not consider prior
operating results with respect to revenues, net income, or any other measure to be indicative of our future operating results.
The timing and amount of future revenues will depend almost entirely on our ability to sell our products to new customers. Our
future operating results will depend upon many other factors, including:
|
•
|
The level of product and price competition,
|
|
•
|
Our success in expanding our business network and managing our growth,
|
|
•
|
Our ability to develop and market product enhancements and new products,
|
|
•
|
The timing of product enhancements, activities of and acquisitions by competitors,
|
|
•
|
The ability to hire additional qualified employees, and
|
|
•
|
The timing of such hiring and our ability to control costs.
|
We have only two outside Board
Directors, which could create conflicts of interests and pose risks from a corporate governance perspective.
Our Board of Directors consists
primarily of current executive officers, which means that
we
have only two outside
or independent directors. The lack of independent directors may prevent the Board from being independent from management in its
judgments and decisions and its ability to pursue the Board responsibilities without undue influence. For example, an independent
Board can serve as a check on management, which can limit management taking unnecessary risks. Furthermore, the lack of a sufficient
number of independent directors creates the potential for conflicts between management and the diligent independent decision-making
process of the Board. In this regard, our lack of an independent compensation committee presents the risk that our executive officers
on the Board may have influence over his/their personal compensation and benefits levels that may not be commensurate with our
financial performance. Furthermore, our lack of outside directors deprives our company of the benefits of various viewpoints and
experience when confronting the challenges
we
face. With only two independent directors
on the Board of Directors, it will be difficult for the Board to fulfill its traditional role as overseeing management.
Our preferred stock may have
rights senior to those of our common stock which could adversely affect holders of common stock.
Our articles of incorporation
give our Board of Directors the authority to issue additional series of preferred stock without a vote or action by our stockholders.
The Board also has the authority to determine the terms of preferred stock, including price, preferences, and voting rights. The
rights granted to holders of preferred stock in the future may adversely affect the rights of holders of our common stock. Any
such authorized class of preferred stock may have a liquidation preference – a pre-set distribution in the event of a liquidation
– that would reduce the amount available for distribution to holders of common stock or superior dividend rights that would
reduce the amount of dividends that could be distributed to common stockholders. In addition, an authorized class of preferred
stock may have voting rights that are superior to the voting rights of the holders of our common stock.
We are an emerging growth
company and, as a result of the reduced disclosure and governance requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, our common
stock may be less attractive to investors.
We are an emerging growth company,
as defined in the JOBS Act, and
we
are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions
from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies, but not to emerging growth companies, including, but
not limited to, a requirement to present only
two
years of audited financial statements,
an exemption from the auditor attestation requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure about executive
compensation arrangements pursuant to the rules applicable to smaller reporting companies and no requirement to seek non-binding
advisory votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements, although some of these exemptions are available to us
as a smaller reporting company (i.e. a company with less than $75 million of its voting equity held by non-affiliates). We have
elected to adopt these reduced disclosure requirements. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive
as a result of our taking advantage of these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result of
our choices, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.
We do not expect to pay any
cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We intend to retain our future
earnings, if any, in order to reinvest in the development and growth of our business and, therefore, do not intend to pay dividends
on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board
of directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, and such other factors as
our board of directors deems relevant. Accordingly, investors may need to sell their shares of our common stock to realize a return
on their investment, and they may not be able to sell such shares at or above the price paid for them.
We can sell additional shares
of common stock without consulting stockholders and without offering shares to existing stockholders, which would result in dilution
of existing stockholders’ interests in RMHB and could depress our stock price.
Our Articles of Incorporation,
as amended, authorize 200,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 105,598,650 are outstanding as of May 8, 2019; 20,000,000 of
preferred stock, of which 1,000,000 shares of series A preferred stock are designated and no shares are issued and outstanding;
7,000,000 shares of series B preferred stock are designated and no shares are issued and outstanding; 2,000,000 shares of series
C preferred stock are designated and no shares are issued and outstanding; 2,000,000 of series D preferred stock are designated
and no shares are issued and outstanding; and 789,474 shares of Series E preferred stock are designated and no shares are issued
and outstanding. Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue additional shares of our common stock and preferred stock. Although
our Board of Directors intends to utilize its reasonable business judgment to fulfill its fiduciary obligations to our then existing
stockholders in connection with any future issuance of our capital stock, the future issuance of additional shares of our common
stock or preferred stock convertible into common stock would cause immediate, and potentially substantial, dilution to our existing
stockholders, which could also have a material effect on the market value of the shares.
Further, our shares do not have
preemptive rights, which mean we can sell shares of our common stock to other persons without offering purchasers in this offering
the right to purchase their proportionate share of such offered shares. Therefore, any additional sales of stock by us could dilute
an existing stockholder’s ownership interest in our company.
You will experience future
dilution as a result of future equity offerings
We may in the future offer additional
shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock. Although no assurances can
be given that we will consummate a financing, in the event we do, or in the event we sell shares of common stock or other securities
convertible into shares of our common stock in the future, additional and substantial dilution will occur. In addition, investors
purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights superior to investors in this offering.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our financial statements
and accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” set forth in the beginning
of this Prospectus, and see “Risk Factors” beginning on page 9 for a discussion of certain risk factors applicable
to our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that
may occur in future periods.
Overview
The Company generates revenue
from finished product sales to distributors (resellers), retailers and consumers. The wholesale market for the Company’s
products includes all retailers in the convenience and grocery store channels as well as a number of specialty retail niche markets
including health food, “smoke shop,” and novelty stores. Additionally, the Company has an online retail presence on
Amazon.com and via our Company websites.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Financial Summary
The Company’s sales for the three
months ended March 31, 2019 were $76,429 compared to net sales of $50,909 for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
The Company’s net loss for the three
months ended March 31, 2019 was $1,263,260 compared to a net loss of $2,332,064 for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
Sales
For the three months ended March 31, 2019
sales were $76,429 compared to net sales of $50,909 for the three months ended March 31, 2018, an increase of $25,520 or 50%.
The sales increase was driven by the incremental sales of our HEMPd product line-up, which was launched in late March 2018 and
our newly-acquired FitWhey branded protein beverages, partially offset by a decrease in sales of our hemp-infused functional beverages.
Sales were lower than expected due to production issues at the Company’s beverage co-packer. These issues delayed the production
and delivery of HEMPd and private label beverages into the second quarter of 2019. We also experienced a decrease in sales of
our natural spring water due to production-related issues with our water co-packer. In the three months ended March 31, 2019 sales
consisted of approximately 80% online sales, 2% distributor sales, and18% direct to retailer sales, compared to approximately
53% online sales, 37% distributor sales, and 10% direct to retailer sales for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
Cost of Sales
For the three months ended March 31, 2019
cost of sales was $75,730 or 99% of sales, compared to $66,990 or 132% of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2018 an increase
of $8,740 or 13%. For the three months ended March 31, 2019 cost of sales increased as a result of increased sales and decreases
as a percent of sales as a result of improved production and freight cost controls in 2019 over the prior year.
Operating Expenses
For the three months ended March 31, 2019,
operating expenses were $1,166,030 or 1526% of sales, compared to $1,150,340 or 2260% of sales for the three months ended March
31, 2018. Areas in which the Company experienced significant changes in operating expenses are discussed below.
General and Administrative
For the three months ended March 31, 2019,
general and administrative expenses were $956,640 or 1252% of sales, compared to $1,080,518 or 2122% of sales for the three months
ended March 31, 2018, a decrease of $123,878 or 11%. The decrease in general and administrative expenses in 2018 was primarily
driven by decreases
in officer compensation, partially offset by increases in
legal
expenses and research and development costs.
Advertising and Marketing
For the three months ended March 31, 2019,
advertising and marketing expenses were $209,390 or 274% of sales, compared to $69,822 or 137% of sales for the three months ended
March 31, 2018, an increase of $139,568 or 200%. The increase in advertising and marketing expenses in 2019 was result of expenditures
for our HEMPd product line-up, which was launched in late March 2018, and the newly-acquired FitWhey branded protein beverages.
Other (Income) Expense
Interest Expense
For the three months ended March 31, 2019,
interest expense was $293,386, compared to $2,817,128 for the three months ended March 31, 2018, a decrease of $2,523,742. The
decrease in interest expense, which includes the amortization of the discount on convertible debt, and the excess of the beneficial
conversion feature on certain convertible notes payable, was due to decreased debt levels and activity in 2019.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
For the three months ended March 31, 2018,
the Company recorded a net loss on extinguishment of debt of $196,500 related to the settlement of convertible debt. There was
no gain or loss on extinguishment of debt for the three months ended March 31, 2019.
Gain on Change in Fair Value of Derivative
Liability
For the three months ended March 31, 2019,
the Company recorded a gain on the change in fair value of derivative liability of $195,457 compared to a gain of $1,847,985 for
the three months ended March 31, 2018. In 2019 the gain resulted from the decrease in the price of the Company’s underlying
stock, which is used to calculate the fair value of the related derivative liability, from the beginning of the three-month period
to the end of the period, and the lack of variable rate convertible notes payable in 2019.
Income Taxes
For the three months ended March 31, 2019
and March 31, 2018, the Company recorded no income tax provision due to a full valuation allowance provided on deferred tax assets
resulting from net operating losses.
Year Ended December 31,
2018 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2017
Financial Summary
The Company’s sales for
the year ended December 31, 2018 were $379,238 compared to $141,289 for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The Company’s net loss
for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $3,355,937 compared to a net loss of $11,643,339 for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Sales
For the year ended December
31, 2018, sales were $379,238 compared to $141,289 for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $237,949 or 168%. The sales
increase was driven by the introduction of our new line of HEMPd products in March 2018, sales of FitWhey products, and increased
sales of our high alkaline natural spring water. These sales increases were partially offset by the decrease in sales of our Rocky
Mountain High branded hemp-infused energy drinks as the Company sold off remaining inventory in anticipation of the 2019 rebranding
of these drinks. For the year ended December 31, 2018, sales by channel were 21% distributor, 12% retailer, and 67% online compared
to the year ended December 31, 2017 during which sales by channel were 24% distributor, 15% retailer, and 61% online.
Cost of Sales
For the year ended
December 31, 2018, cost of sales was $410,818 or 108% of sales, versus $297,487 or 211% of sales for the year ended December
31, 2017, an increase of $113,331 or 38%. In 2018 the Company recorded inventory obsolescence expense of $25,145 compared to
$165,271 in 2017. In 2018 the obsolescence expense related primarily to E-Juice and vape products that the Company no longer
carries. In 2017 the obsolescence expense was comprised of the write-down of the remaining hemp-infused beverage and shots
inventory to reflect selling price reductions.
Operating Expenses
For the year ended December
31, 2018, operating expenses were $4,523,108, compared to $7,407,789 for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $2,884,681
or 38%. Areas in which the Company experienced significant changes in operating expenses are discussed below.
General and Administrative
For the year ended
December 31, 2018, general and administrative expenses were $3,689,175 or 973% of sales, compared to $6,465,861 or 4576% of
sales for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $2,776,686 or 42%. The decrease in general and administrative
expenses in 2018 was driven by decreases in compensation expense to former members of the Board of Directors and bad debt
expense, partially offset by increases in legal expenses.
Advertising and Marketing
For the year ended December
31, 2018, advertising and marketing expenses were $833,933 or 220% of sales, compared to $882,765 or 625% of sales for the year
ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $48,832 or 6%. The decrease in advertising and marketing expenses in 2018 was a result of
management’s decision to decrease advertising and marketing expenditures on the Company’s hemp-infused beverages and
energy shots, partially offset by an increase in costs related to the launch of the new HEMPd products and advertising for the
newly-acquired FitWhey brand. Additionally, in 2017 the Company executed a large marketing contract with a third-party promoter
and issued stock to a distributor in exchange for promotional activity.
Impairment Expense
During the year ended December
31, 2017, the Company recorded an impairment expense of $59,163 related to its investment in Rocky Mountain High Water Company.
This represented a 100% impairment on this investment. There was no impairment recorded in 2018.
Other (Income) Expense
Interest Expense
For the year ended December
31, 2018, interest expense was $1,275,693, compared to $2,700,221 for the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $1,424,528
or 53%. The decrease in interest expense, which includes the amortization of the discount on convertible debt, beneficial conversion
features on convertible debt, interest on Series C Preferred Stock, and interest on newly issued convertible debt was due to decreased
debt activity in 2018.
Gain (Loss) on Extinguishment of Debt
For the year ended December
31, 2018, the Company recorded a net loss on extinguishment of debt of $191,138 related to the settlement of convertible debt.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a net gain on extinguishment of debt of $1,200,092 related to the
settlement of convertible debt.
Gain on Change in Redemption Value of Series
C Preferred Stock
For the year ended December
31, 2017, the Company recorded a gain of $834,242 on the change in redemption value of Series C Preferred Stock related to the
valuation of these shares. There was no change in redemption value in 2018 as the Series C Preferred Stock was cancelled in October
2017 as part of a legal settlement with the holder.
Gain on Lawsuit Judgment and Legal Settlement
For the year ended December
31, 2018, the Company recorded a $654,289 gain on a lawsuit judgment against the Company’s former Chairman of the Board,
a $34,435 gain related to the settlement of a lawsuit with Statewide Beverage, and a gain on a judgment against the holder of our
Series A Preferred Stock of $1,000, which represented the par value of the 1,000,000 shares. There were no such gains in 2017.
Gain (Loss) on Change in Fair Value of
Derivative Liability
For the year ended December
31, 2018, the Company recorded a gain on the change in fair value of derivative liability of $1,975,858 compared to a loss of $3,413,465
for the year ended December 31, 2017. In 2018 the gain resulted from the decrease in the price of the Company’s underlying
stock, which is used to calculate the fair value of the related derivative liability, from the beginning of the nine-month period
to the end of the period and a decrease in the balance of variable rate convertible notes payable. In 2017 the gain resulted from
an increase in the risk-free interest rate and the Company’s stock volatility factors that are inputs in the derivative liability
calculation.
Income Taxes
For the years ended December
31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company recorded no income tax provision due to a full valuation allowance provided on deferred
tax assets resulting from net operating losses.
Six Months Ended December 31, 2017 Compared
to Six Months Ended December 31, 2016
Financial Summary
The Company’s sales for
the six months ended December 31, 2017 were $59,653 compared to $320,338 for the six months ended December 31, 2016.
The Company’s net loss
for the six months ended December 31, 2017 was $5,507,781 compared to a net loss of $3,140,693 for the six months ended December
31, 2016.
Sales
For the six months ended December
31, 2017, sales were $59,653 compared to $320,338 for the six months ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $260,685 or 81%. The
sales decrease was driven primarily by the lack of funding for inventory production, direct sales support, and advertising and
promotion of the Company’s products. Also, in 2017 the Company has reduced prices on its existing drinks and shots inventory
in order to clear out existing inventory and prepare for the launch of its new HEMPd product line. The prior year sales amount
included a large sale to a distributor. In the six months ended December 31, 2017 sales consisted of approximately 68% online sales,
22% retailer sales, and 10% distributor sales, compared to 97% distributor sales and 3% online sales for the six months ended December
31, 2016.
Cost of Sales
For the six months ended December
31, 2017, cost of sales was $173,043 or 290% of sales, versus $127,476 or 40% of sales for the six months ended December 31, 2016,
an increase of $45,567 or 36%. In 2017 the Company recorded inventory obsolescence expense of $93,110 compared to $28,837 in 2016,
resulting in a high cost of sales percentage. In 2017 the obsolescence expense was comprised of the write-down of the remaining
hemp-infused beverage and shots inventory to reflect selling price reductions. In 2016, the obsolescence expense was due to the
write-off of the Company’s expired brownie inventory.
Operating Expenses
For the six months ended December
31, 2017, operating expenses were $2,744,840 or 4,214% of sales, compared to $2,602,148 or 812% of sales for the six months ended
December 31, 2016, an increase of $142,692 or 6%. Areas in which the Company experienced significant changes in operating expenses
are discussed below.
General and Administrative
For the six months ended
December 31, 2017, general and administrative expenses were $2,567,486 or 4,304% of sales, compared to $1,853,089 or 579% of
sales for the six months ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $714,396 or 39%. The increase in general and administrative
expenses in 2017 was driven by fees and penalties paid on convertible debt.
Advertising and Marketing
For the six months ended December
31, 2017, advertising and marketing expenses were $118,191 or 198% of sales, compared to $749,059 or 234% of sales for the six
months ended December 31, 2016, a decrease of $630,868 or 84%. The decrease in advertising and marketing expenses in 2017 was driven
by the lack of funding for advertising and promotional expenditures and the decreased need to advertise and promote the Company’s
existing products in anticipation of the launch of the new product line.
Impairment Expense
During the six months ended
December 31, 2017, the Company recorded an impairment expense of $59,163 related to its investment in Rocky Mountain High Water
Company. This represented a 100% impairment on this investment. There was no impairment recorded during the six months ended December
31, 2016.
Other (Income) Expense
Interest Expense
For the six months ended December
31, 2017, interest expense was $2,054,438, compared to $398,648 for the six months ended December 31, 2016, an increase of $1,655,790
or 415%. The increase in interest expense, which includes the amortization of the discount on convertible debt, beneficial conversion
features on convertible debt, interest on Series C Preferred Stock, and interest on newly issued convertible debt was due to increased
debt activity in 2017.
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
For the six months ended December
31, 2017, the Company recorded a gain of $1,200,092 on the extinguishment of debt. The gain was a result of the amendment of two
convertible notes into non-convertible notes. There was no change gain or loss on the extinguishment of debt during the six months
ended December 31, 2016.
Loss on Change in Fair Value of Derivative
Liability
For the six months ended
December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a loss on the change in fair value of derivative liability of $1,795,205 compared to
a loss of $332,759 during the six months ended December 31, 2016. In 2017 the loss resulted from the increase in convertible
debt and the related increase in the value of the conversion features, partially offset by the decrease in the price of the
Company’s underlying stock, which is used to calculate the fair value of the related derivative liability, over the
period from July 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. The smaller loss in 2016 resulted from the relative stability of the price of
the Company’s common stock between July 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017.
Income Taxes
For the six months ended December
31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded no income tax benefit due to a full valuation allowance provided on deferred tax assets
resulting from net operating losses.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
As of March 31, 2019, the Company had current
assets of $1,175,447, consisting of cash of $277,455, accounts receivable (net) of $9,909, inventory of $439,066, and prepaid
expenses and other current assets of $449,017. As of March 31, 2019,
the
Company
had current liabilities of $2,137,658, consisting of accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $631,595, convertible
notes payable (net) of $760,346, notes payable of $34,346, accrued interest of $43,164, deferred revenue of $466,300, and derivative
liability of $201,907.
Cash flows from operating activities
Net cash used in operating activities during
the three months ended March 31, 2019 was $1,350,130 compared to $997,793 used during the three months ended March 31, 2018. The
change was principally driven by a buildup of inventory and prepaid expenses and other current assets in anticipation of production
runs in the second quarter of 2019 compared to 2018.
Cash flows from investing activities
There were no investing activities during
the three months ended March 31, 2019 compared to $32,270 during the three months ended March 31, 2018. In 2018, the Company invested
$31,220 in new software for the HEMPd brand.
Cash flows from financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
during the three months ended March 31, 2019 was $1,013,899 compared to $1,594,026 during the three months ended March 31, 2018.
In 2019, proceeds of $1,017,046 were from the issuance of common stock compared to $1,470,000 in 2018. Also in 2019, the Company
repaid $3,147 on notes payable. In 2018, the Company received proceeds of $300,000 related to the issuance of convertible notes
payable, repaid $172,932 of convertible notes payable, and repaid $3,042 on notes payable.
Outstanding Material Indebtedness
Recently, the Company’s operations
have been funded primarily through the private sales of common stock or the issuance of convertible promissory notes, which are
convertible to common stock at a fixed price of $0.10 or at a discount to market price (as defined in the agreements) of 50%.
As of March 31, 2019, the Company had total notes payable outstanding of $794,692 (net of discount).
On October 12, 2017 the Company executed
an Equity Financing Agreement (“EFA”) with GHS Investments LLC (“GHS”). Under the agreement, GHS has committed
to purchase up $12 million of the Company’s common stock over a 24-month period at a 20% discount off the market price,
as defined in the agreement. The agreement contains certain restrictions on the timing of the stock purchases and required the
Company to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to register the common
shares issuable under the agreement. On November 1, 2017, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 to register 15,000,000
common shares to be resold by GHS. On February 9, 2018 the Company received a Notice of Effectiveness from the SEC on an amended
Form S-1 registering 12,500,000 common shares. The Company began stock sales to GHS on February 13, 2018 and has since sold all
12,500,000 shares to GHS.
On June 27, 2018, the Company entered into
a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) with GHS, which provides for GHS to purchase up to $15,000,000 of the Company’s
common stock over a 24-month period based on a contractually agreed upon market discount. The SPA replaces the EFA the Company
entered into with GHS on October 12, 2017. On August 8, 2018, the Company filed a registration statement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to register up to 16,000,000 shares of our common stock to be purchased by GHS under the
SPA. The registration statement became effective on October 10, 2018. Management believes the SPA, along with bridge financing
from GHS, will provide sufficient cash flows until cash flows from operations become consistently positive.
Known Trends and Uncertainties Expected to Have
a Material Impact on Revenues
We expect our revenues
to increase materially during the remainder
of 2019 and in 2020
, primarily due to anticipated
sales under our private label manufacturing contract with CBD Alimentos SA de CV (“CBD Alimentos”), which will purchase
our inventory through its sister company CBD Life. The initial order from CBD Life is expected to ship late in the second quarter
or early third quarter of 2019 with additional orders to follow. We received the initial purchase order and deposit of $466,300
in December 2018. We also expect to begin shipping product under our private label agreement with Green Lotus in the second quarter
of 2019. Lastly, we expect revenue growth from our new HEMPd branded CBD-infused flavored and unflavored waters and other HEMPd
branded products. Revenue from the new HEMPd products is inherently difficult to project and will depend on the level of market
acceptance and market penetration that can be achieved for these new products.
The Company is in discussions
with two separate national distribution companies as well as other regional distributors that are interested in carrying the Company’s
products. The Company expects to execute supply agreements with one or more of these distributors in the second quarter of 2019.
Future Liquidity Requirements
The Company’s
anticipated operational shortfall for the next twelve months is $1,000,000 to $1,500,000. We plan to utilize the SPA executed with
GHS in June 2018 to raise the required capital.
The Company expects the SPA with GHS to cover the
operational shortfall over the next twelve months. In the event that the SPA does not provide adequate funding, either for contractual,
market, or other reasons, the Company would seek funding from other financing sources as it has done in the past. There are no
guarantees the Company would be able to source such incremental funding. In this case, the Company would have to curtail its expansion
plans.
Below is a summary of the potential total
proceeds to be received under the SPA under a range of trading prices, including our $0.052 June 11, 2019 closing price and prices
which are 30% greater and lesser than such price in order to reflect a range of possibilities depending on the price fluctuations
which are typical of our common stock:
|
|
@
82% of
Close
|
|
@
82% of
Close
(+30%)
|
|
@82%
of
Close
(-30%)
|
Closing Stock Price
– June 11, 2019
|
|
$
|
.052
|
|
|
$
|
.052
|
|
|
$
|
.052
|
As Adjusted for Discount
|
|
$
|
.04264
|
|
|
$
|
.05543
|
|
|
$
|
.02985
|
Registered Shares
|
|
|
30,000,000
|
|
|
|
30,000,000
|
|
|
|
30,000,000
|
Total Proceeds
|
|
$
|
1,279,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,662,960
|
|
|
$
|
895,440,060
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2018, there were no off-balance
sheet arrangements.
Going Concern
The Company has a shareholders’
deficit of $702,555, an accumulated deficit of $35,018,351 as of December 31, 2018, and has generated operating losses since inception.
These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. The Company’s
continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate revenues and its ability to continue raising capital
from third parties. Management believes the SPA will provide sufficient cash flows until cash flows from operations become consistently
positive.
Critical Accounting Policies
and Estimates
In December 2001, the SEC requested
that all registrants list their most “critical accounting polices” in the Management Discussion and Analysis. The SEC
indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of a company’s
financial condition and results, and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result
of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We do not believe that the following accounting
policies currently fit this definition:
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the
financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. Certain of the Company’s estimates could be affected by external conditions, including
those unique to its industry, and general economic conditions. It is possible that these external factors could have an effect
on the Company’s estimates that could cause actual results to differ from its estimates. The Company re-evaluates all of
its accounting estimates at least quarterly based on these conditions and record adjustments when necessary.
Revenue Recognition
The Company follows the
guidance of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,”
as amended. We record revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, product delivery has occurred, the selling price
to the customer is fixed or determinable and collectability of the revenue is reasonably assured. The Company has not experienced
any significant returns from customers and accordingly, in management’s opinion, no reserve for returns has been provided.
Payments received prior to shipment of goods are recorded as deferred revenue.
Accounts Receivable and
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable
The Company has a policy
of reserving for uncollectible accounts based on the best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts
receivable. We extend credit to customers based on an evaluation of their financial condition and other factors. The Company generally
does not require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable and perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers
and maintain an allowance for potential bad debts if required.
It is determined whether
an allowance for doubtful accounts is required by evaluating specific accounts where information indicates the customers may have
an inability to meet financial obligations. In these cases,
we
use assumptions and
judgment, based on the best available facts and circumstances, to record a specific allowance for those customers against amounts
due to reduce the receivable to the amount expected to be collected. These specific allowances are re-evaluated and adjusted as
additional information is received. The amounts calculated are analyzed to determine the total amount of the allowance. The Company
may also record a general allowance as necessary.
Direct write-offs are
taken in the period when we have exhausted our efforts to collect overdue and unpaid receivables or otherwise evaluate other circumstances
that indicate the collectability of receivables.
Inventories
Inventories, which
consist of the Company’s finished products held for resale, raw materials, and packaging, are stated at the lower of cost,
determined using the first-in, first-out, and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price, in the
ordinary course of business, less estimated costs to dispose of the product.
If the Company identifies
excess, obsolete or unsalable items, its inventories are written down to their realizable value in the period in which the impairment
is first identified. Shipping and handling costs incurred for inventory purchases and product shipments are recorded in cost of
sales in the Company’s statements of operations.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted the
provisions of ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which defines fair value as used in numerous
accounting pronouncements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements.
The estimated fair value
of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses
are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.
The carrying amounts of our short and long-term credit obligations approximate fair value because the effective yields on these
obligations, which include contractual interest rates taken together with other features such as concurrent issuances of warrants
and/or embedded conversion options, are comparable to rates of returns for instruments of similar credit risk.
ASC 820 defines fair value
as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC
820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the
use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair
value:
|
•
|
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
•
|
Level 2 — quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable.
|
|
•
|
Level 3 — inputs that are unobservable (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions).
|
The derivative liability,
which relates to the conversion feature of convertible debt and common stock warrants and options, is classified as a Level 3 liability,
and is the only financial liability measure at fair value on a recurring basis.
The change in the Level 3 financial instruments is as
follows:
Balance, June 30, 2017
|
|
|
$
|
5,072,579
|
Issued
|
|
|
|
4,017,623
|
Exercises/Conversions
|
|
|
$
|
(5,276,018)
|
Change in fair value
recognized in operations
|
|
|
$
|
1,795,205
|
Balance, December 31, 2017
|
|
|
$
|
5,609,389
|
Issued
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
Exercises/Conversions
|
|
|
$
|
(3,257,359)
|
Change in fair value recognized in operations
|
|
|
$
|
(1,975,858)
|
Balance, December 31, 2018
|
|
|
$
|
376,172
|
The estimated fair value of the derivative instruments
was valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following assumptions as of December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017:
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
Estimated dividends
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
106%
|
|
|
165%
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
1.39%
|
Expected term
|
|
|
.1
to 4.0 years
|
|
|
1
to 4.8 years
|
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment
is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided for on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of
the assets. Expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized; repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates intangible
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable.
The Company assesses the recoverability of the assets based on the undiscounted future cash flow and recognizes an impairment loss
when the estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to result from the use of the asset plus the net proceeds expected from
disposition of the asset, if any, are less than the carrying value of the asset. When the Company identifies an impairment, it
reduces the carrying amount of the asset to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach or, when available
and appropriate, to comparable market values. During the six months and year ended December 31, 2017 the Company recorded an impairment
charge on the goodwill related to the acquisition of Rocky Mountain High Water Company in the amount of $59,163. As of December
31, 2018 and 2017, the goodwill related to this acquisition is fully impaired. No impairment charges were recorded during the year
ended December 31, 2018.
Share-Based Payments
Share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the financial statements based on their fair
values, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required
to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).
The Company issued restricted
stock to consultants and employees for various services. Cost for these transactions are measured at the fair value of the consideration
received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of the common stock
is to be measured at the earlier of (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity
instruments is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete.
Convertible Instruments
The Company evaluates and
accounts for conversion options embedded in convertible instruments in accordance with ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging Activities.”
Applicable GAAP requires companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as freestanding
derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics
and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of
the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not
re-measured at fair value under other GAAP with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument
with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument.
Preferred Stock
We apply the guidance enumerated
in ASC 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” when determining the classification and measurement of preferred
stock. Preferred shares subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified as liability instruments and are measured at fair
value. We classify conditionally redeemable preferred shares (if any), which includes preferred shares that feature redemption
rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely
within our control, as temporary equity. At all other times, we classify our preferred shares in shareholders’ equity. Our
preferred shares do not feature any redemption rights within the holders’ control or conditional redemption features not
within our control. Accordingly, unless otherwise noted, all issuances of preferred stock are presented as a component of consolidated
shareholders’ equity (deficit).
Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements
In February 2016, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02,
Leases (Topic
840)
, which requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a right-of-use asset, representing their right to use the underlying
asset for the lease term, and a lease liability for all leases with terms greater than 12 months. The guidance also requires qualitative
and quantitative disclosures designed to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02
is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-02 will have
on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued
ASU 2016-13,
Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326)
, which requires the immediate recognition of management’s
estimates of current and expected credit losses. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2021. The Company
is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this guidance on our financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB
issued ASU 2017-01,
Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805)
, which clarifies the definition
of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted
for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 is required to be applied prospectively and will be effective
for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. The impact on our consolidated financial statements will depend on the facts and circumstances
of any specific future transactions.
In May 2018, the FASB issued
ASU 2018-09,
Compensation-Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting
. This ASU amends the scope of modification
accounting for share-based payment arrangements, provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based
payment awards an entity is required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718. This update is effective for the Company beginning
January 1, 2021. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2018-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2018, the FASB issued
ASU 2018-07,
Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting
. The
guidance is intended to reduce the complexity associated with issuers’ accounting for share-based payment transactions for
acquiring goods and services. The ASU is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2022. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact that ASU 2018-07 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Derivatives and Hedging
(Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite
Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling
Interests with a Scope Exception
. The guidance is intended to reduce the complexity associated with issuers’ accounting
for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. Specifically, a down round feature (as defined)
would no longer cause a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or an embedded conversion option) to be accounted for
as a derivative liability at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in current earnings. The amendments in this ASU are
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2018-11 will have
on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB
issued ASU 2018-13,
Fair Value Measurements: Disclosure Framework Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement
.
This update modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820. The ASU is effective for the Company
beginning January 1, 2021. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2018-13 will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
Current Product Offerings
The Company’s Wellness For Life Colorado,
Inc. subsidiary currently markets the following lineup of CBD-infused products under the HEMPd brand:
|
•
|
CBD-Infused Waters – The Company’s initial production
run of CBD-Infused waters consisted of 12 oz. cans each containing 5mg of CBD. The Company raised the CBD content to 20mg per can
in its March 2019 production run.
|
|
•
|
Gummies – Each bottle contains 30
gummies
containing 25mg of full plant hemp extract in assorted flavors. Gummies are made to be chewed and ingested for absorption
for hemp absorption.
|
|
•
|
Water Soluble Concentrate – Each bottle contains 1,500mg
of full plant hemp extract. Consumers place approximately 8 drops of this water-soluble concentrate in 12-16 oz. of water for a
daily dose of hemp.
|
|
•
|
Tinctures – Each bottle contains 300mg of full plant hemp
extract. Consumers place these drops under their tongue. Flavors include tangerine, lemon, and spearmint.
|
|
•
|
Capsules – Each bottle contains 30 capsules containing 25mg
of full plant hemp extract. The capsules are swallowed for ingestion and hemp absorption.
|
|
•
|
Triple Relief Salve – Each jar contains 250mg of full plant
hemp extract. The salve is used directly on skin for pain relief in muscles, bones and joints.
|
|
•
|
Serenity Hemp Lotion – Each bottle contains 250mg of full
plant hemp extract. Lotion is meant to be applied to any part of the skin for absorption into your body.
|
Under its Rocky Mountain High Brands name,
the Company marketed a lineup of five hemp-infused 16 oz. beverages in 2017 and 2018, including:
|
•
|
Naturally Flavored Citrus Energy Drink - A citrus energy drink
that contains 100mg of hempseed extract and is complemented with ginseng and guarana extract, caffeine and other ingredients
|
|
•
|
Naturally Flavored Mango Energy Drink - A mango energy drink that
contains 100mg of hempseed extract and is complemented with ginseng and guarana extract, caffeine and other ingredients.
|
|
•
|
Low Calorie Coconut Energy
Lime
- A low-calorie coconut lime energy drink that contains 100mg of hempseed extract and is complemented with ginseng and guarana
extract, caffeine and other ingredients.
|
|
•
|
Naturally Flavored Lemonade - A lemonade drink that contains 100mg
of hempseed extract and is complemented with ginseng extract and other ingredients.
|
|
•
|
Naturally Flavored Black Tea - A black tea drink that contains
100mg of hempseed extract and is complemented with black tea and ginseng extract and other ingredients.
|
RMHB sold its remaining inventory of these products
in March 2019.
Our Eagle Spirit Land
and Water Company currently markets its naturally high alkaline spring water in two sizes: a 500ml (16.9 oz.) plastic bottle sold
in cases of 24 and a 1-liter bottle sold in cases of 12. The Company also previously sold a 10-liter (2.64-gallon) Bag in a Box
product.
Private Label
CBD Life
In December 2017, the
Company executed a three-year Master Manufacturing Agreement with CBD Alimentos SA de CV (“CBD-Alimentos”), a Mexican
food and beverage distributor. Under the agreement (as amended), CBD Alimentos, through its sister company, CBD Life, will be our
exclusive distributor in Mexico for all of our CBD-infused energy and functional beverages. In turn,
we
will be CBD Alimentos’ exclusive supplier of such products. The beverages supplied to CBD Alimentos will be private
label products made to order for CBD Alimentos, and
we
will cooperate on laboratory
and taste-testing of each batch of beverages at the co-packing facility. In accordance with the Agreement, RMHB opened a separate
operating bank account for all deposits made by CBD Alimentos towards the purchase of ingredients and packaging. CBD Alimentos
is required to maintain a positive cash balance in the account at all times. The Company will have full unilateral authority to
disburse funds from the bank account to vendors, suppliers, co-packers and the Company solely for the purposes of production and
the Company’s margin on the sale. CBD Alimentos’ initial purchase order, including a deposit of $466,300 was received
in December 2018. Due to ingredient and packaging sourcing delays, production did not commence in 2018 as expected. The Company’s
initial production run of 2,000,000 cans is expected to be completed in June 2019.
Green Lotus
On February 21, 2019 the Company
entered into a Beverage Manufacture and Supply Agreement with Texas Wellness Center, LLC
,
a marketer and distributor of
hemp and CBD products under the
“
Green Lotus” brand. Under the Agreement, the Company will be the exclusive
supplier to Texas Wellness for hemp-infused beverages for the Green Lotus brand. The Company will produce a Green Lotus Premium
Sparkling Hemp Water in Watermelon and Grapefruit flavors, each containing 25mg of naturally occurring cannabinoids. Texas Wellness
will supply the hemp-derived ingredients for the beverages, and Rocky Mountain High Brands will provide all other materials necessary
for the production, processing, batching, labeling, and packaging of the beverages. The Agreement runs for an initial term of three
years, with subsequent automatic annual renewals. The Agreement may be terminated upon 180 days written notice. The Company’s
initial production run of 100,000 cans is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2019.
Upcoming Product Offerings
The Company is currently
updating the formulations of its hemp-infused drinks under the Rocky Mountain brand name and will reintroduce them in the second
quarter of 2019. These drinks will contain 250mg of hemp seed extract and be carbonated.
The Company’s
WFLC subsidiary plans to introduce hemp-infused flavored waters under the HEMPd brand name in the second quarter of 2019. These
drinks will contain 250mg of hemp seed extract be sold exclusively to our national distributor.
The Company’s Eagle Spirit subsidiary plans to
launch the Spirit Water brand in 2019.
The Company plans to continually
update and improve its product offerings in accordance with consumer demand, changes in federal and local regulations, and internal
research and development. Ongoing research and development costs are not expected to be material.
Sales Channels
The Company sells its products
to retailers, distributors, and online directly to consumers via Amazon and the Company’s websites: www.HEMPd.com, www.EagleSpiritWater.com,
and www.LiveRockyMountainHigh.com. For the year ended December 31, 2018, sales by channel were 21% distributor, 12% retailer, and
67% online. In 2018 the Company’s
two
largest customers represented 12% and
7% of sales.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, sales by channel were
24% distributor, 15% retailer, and 61% online. In 2017 the Company’s
two
largest
customers represented 21% and 12% of sales. For the six months ended December 31, 2017, sales by channel were 10% distributor,
22% retailer, and 68% online. In the same period the Company’s two largest customers each represented 6% of sales.
Outsourced Production and Storage Services
In May 2016, the
Company executed a one-year agreement with MBA Beverage to coordinate the manufacturing of our hemp-infused beverage products.
MBA Beverage acted as our outsourced supply-chain management and coordinated every aspect of the manufacturing process. The contract
expired in May 2017 and was not renewed.
Through early 2018, Blues
City Brewery, LLC (“Blues City”) in Memphis, Tennessee, a subsidiary of City Brewing Company, LLC, completed all beverage
production and canning. Blues City is an FDA registered facility that is audited annually to ensure compliance with FDA GMP (Good
Manufacturing Practices) for food safety. MBA Beverage schedules beverage production with Blues City. Upon completion of the production,
the Company stored finished product at Blues City, awaiting sale. The Company did not contract with Blues City directly.
On January 9, 2019
the Company executed an agreement with Optimus Fulfill LLC in Coppell Texas to co-pack beverages. The agreement terminates on December
31, 2024. The Company will utilize other co-packers as necessary to supplement Optimus’ production capabilities.
The Company utilizes numerous
vendors to collaborate on product formulation. All formulas developed for the Company through outside vendors are the property
of the Company.
Our naturally high
alkaline spring water is cold-filtered and packaged by a third-party water processor, Water Event Pure Water Solutions (“Water
Event”).
On February 24, 2018
the Company executed an Amazon Brand Development and Launch Agreement with BuyDMi, Inc. (DBA GoodforYou.com) for the new HEMPd
product line. Under this contract GoodforYou.com is creating an Amazon page for the initial 17 HEMPd products, converting all HEMPd
products to Amazon Prime offerings, providing customer phone and email support, managing inventory forecasting, shipping, storage,
and returns, and launching sponsored ad campaigns. The Company cancelled this contract in December 2018 and is currently performing
these functions through other less expensive vendors.
On March 20, 2018
the Company executed a Fulfillment and Customer Support Services Agreement with GoodforYou.com for the new HEMPd product line.
Under this contract GoodforYou.com managed inventory and providing storage, shipping, and customer support services. The Company
cancelled this contract in December 2018 and is currently performing these functions through other less expensive vendors.
Regulatory
Requirements
We are subject to numerous
federal, state, local, and foreign laws and regulations, including those relating to:
|
•
|
The production of beverages and other related products;
|
|
•
|
The preparation and sale of beverage;
|
|
•
|
Environmental protection;
|
|
•
|
Interstate commerce and taxation laws; and
|
|
•
|
Workplace and safety conditions,
minimum
wage and other labor requirements
|
The Company’s
hemp and CBD products are derived from industrial hemp, not marijuana. There is a clear scientific distinction between the two
plants: The Company’s products contain less than 0.3% tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”), the psychoactive compound
found in marijuana. (Most marijuana contains over 10% THC). There is also a clear legal distinction between the two plants. While
marijuana is illegal under U.S. federal law, the industrial hemp used in our products is 100% legal at the federal level. It is
grown under a duly-licensed state agricultural pilot program conducted by the Colorado Department of Agriculture, as authorized
by the 2014 U.S. Farm Bill. The Farm Bill explicitly exempts hemp products from the definition of “marijuana” and explicitly
exempts hemp products from the purview and regulation of the Controlled Substances Act. Furthermore, the 2016 Omnibus Appropriations
Act specifically instructs federal agencies not to interfere with the transport or sale of pilot program hemp products such as
the ones sold by the Company. The 2018 Farm Bill specifically removed hemp from Schedule 1 of the Controlled Substances Act. The
law also prohibits states from interfering with the transportation of hemp and hemp products from one state to another.
Our beverage products are
not subject to direct FDA approval as the FDA does not perform review testing or approval of food, beverages or dietary supplements.
The FDA requires that we manufacture our products in commercial manufacturing facilities that are annually audited to ensure that
they pass inspection based on Good Manufacturing Practices for food safety.
Employees and Independent
Contractors
The Company currently
has four officers and three non-officer employees. The Company uses independent contractors, when necessary, to support operational
or back-office functions.
Implications of
Emerging Growth Company Status
As a company with less
than $1 billion in revenue in our last fiscal year, we are defined as an “emerging growth company” under the Jumpstart
Our Business Startups (“JOBS”) Act. We will retain “emerging growth company” status until the earliest
of:
|
•
|
The last day of the fiscal year during which our annual revenues are equal to or exceed $1 billion;
|
|
•
|
The last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of our first sale of common stock pursuant to a registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which
we
refer to in this document as the Securities Act;
|
|
•
|
The date on which
we
have issued more than $1 billion in nonconvertible debt in a previous three-year period; or
|
|
•
|
The date on which
we
qualify as a large accelerated filer under Rule 12b-2 adopted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (i.e., an issuer with a public float of $700 million that has been filing reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Exchange Act for at least 12 months).
|
|
•
|
As an emerging growth company,
we
may take advantage of specified reduced disclosure and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to SEC reporting companies. For so long as
we
remain an emerging growth company
we
will not be required to:
|
|
•
|
Have an auditor report on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2002;
|
|
•
|
Comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (i.e., an auditor discussion and analysis);
|
|
•
|
Submit certain executive compensation matters to stockholder non-binding advisory votes;
|
|
•
|
Submit for stockholder approval golden parachute payments not previously approved;
|
|
•
|
Disclose certain executive compensation related items, as
we
will be subject to the scaled disclosure requirements of a smaller reporting company with respect to executive compensation disclosure; and
|
|
•
|
Present more than
two
years of audited financial statements and
two
years of selected financial data in a registration statement for our initial public offering of our securities.
|
Pursuant to Section 107(b)
of the JOBS Act, we have elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards under
Section 102(b)(2) of The JOBS Act. This election allows us to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have
different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As a result, our financial
statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides
that our decision to opt into the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.
Because the worldwide
market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates, or public float, is below $75 million,
we
are also a “smaller reporting company” as defined under the Exchange Act. Some of the foregoing reduced disclosure
and other requirements are also available to us because
we
are a smaller reporting
company and may continue to be available to us even after
we
are no longer an emerging
growth company under the JOBS Act but remain a smaller reporting company under the Exchange Act. As a smaller reporting company
we
are not required to:
|
•
|
Have an auditor report on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; and
|
|
•
|
Present more than
two
years of audited financial statements in our registration statements and annual reports on Form 10-K and present any selected financial data in such registration statements and annual reports.
|
Intellectual
Property
We currently
hold the following trademarks related to our products:
Properties
At present, we do not own any real property.
As of December 31, 2018, we leased approximately 7,000 square feet of office space at 9101 LBJ Freeway, Suite 200, Dallas, Texas
75243. Our lease period began on September 1, 2016 and terminates on August 31, 2019. Payments under the lease are as follows:
Lease Period
|
|
Base Rent (monthly)
|
9/1/2016 to 8/31/2017
|
|
|
$
|
7,715.00
|
9/1/2017 to 8/31/2018
|
|
|
$
|
7,972.17
|
9/1/2018 to 8/31/2019
|
|
|
$
|
8,229.33
|
In connection with the new lease, we also
purchased used office furniture from the landlord and financed this purchase with a note payable in the amount of $40,122 with
an interest rate of 0% and monthly payments of $1,114 over thirty-six monthly installments.
On January 18, 2018, the RMHC entered
into a 12-month office use agreement for office space in Denver, Colorado. Monthly payments are $91. This agreement renewed on
January 19, 2019 for another 12-month period.
The Company leases the following
warehouse space on a month-to-month basis:
|
•
|
Water Event, Carrollton, Texas – We
lease space for both hemp-infused beverages and spring water. The Company also stores small quantities of ice barrels and other
packaging at this location. As of March 30, 2019, the Company held no inventory at this location.
|
|
•
|
American Fitness Wholesale, Tempe, Arizona
– We lease space on a month-to-month basis for FitWhey beverages at this location.
|
|
•
|
Pet
Healthy Brands, Dallas, Texas – We lease space on a month-to-month basis for packaging and ingredients at this location.
|
Our monthly
rent varies depending on how much inventory is stored. Inventory levels fluctuate based on production and sales.
The Company is currently
evaluating its growth requirements and researching alternatives to lower its recurring expenses for warehouse space.
Legal Proceedings
Rocky Mountain High
Brands, Inc. v Lyonpride Music, LLC, United States District Court Northern District of Texas, 3:18-cv-00045-C, now Lyonpride Music
LLC v Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc., Before the American Arbitration Association, 01-18-0003-1428.
The Company filed
a suit against Lyonpride Music, LLC (“Lyonpride”) for fraud and for declaratory relief with respect to a contract between
the parties. Lyonpride is seeking monetary damages from the Company for breach of contract and the Company is seeking monetary
damages against Lyonpride. The case has been referred to binding arbitration as referenced above. The parties are conducting discovery.
Dallas County Texas,
Case Number DC-17-15441 filed November 8, 2017. Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. f/k/a Republic of Texas Brands, Inc. Plaintiff,
vs. Jerry Grisaffi, Joe Radcliffe, LSW Holdings, LLC, Lily Li, Epic Group One, LLC, Kenneth Radcliffe, Dennis Radcliffe, Phil Uhrik,
Michael Radcliffe, Frank Izzo, Morgan Albright, John Garrison, BB Winks, LLC, Crackerjack Classic, LLC, and Universal Consulting,
LLC.
The Company sought
the return of our Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A”) issued to Jerry Grisaffi (“Grisaffi”), RMHB’s
former Chairman of the Board, and common stock issued to certain other defendants or later obtained by certain other defendants
for little or no consideration paid to the Company. The Company alleged, among other things, that Grisaffi breached his fiduciary
duty to the Company by issuing these Series A shares to himself and common stock to himself and others. RMHB also sought to void
the Indemnification and Release Agreement (“Indemnification”) between the Company and Grisaffi that was executed in
June 2017.
Grisaffi filed a counterclaim
against the Company seeking payment for two promissory notes allegedly owed to him, as well as relief under the Indemnification.
Those notes have been accounted for in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Those counterclaim matters had been
proactively addressed in the Company’s original suit, seeking to void the Indemnification and the two notes based on, among
other things, fraud of Grisaffi. Grisaffi had also filed a derivative suit within the main lawsuit. The Company filed a motion
to dismiss the derivative suit and on August 3, 2018 the Trial Court entered an Order Dismissing Derivative Claims, dismissing
the derivative suit with prejudice. That Order is final.
In June 2018 LSW Holdings,
LLC (“LSW”) and Lily Li (“Li”) filed counterclaims against the Company, generally seeking an increase of
voting rights of the Series A shares to 1200:1, a declaration that the Series A shares were validly issued to Grisaffi, challenging
the authorized share increase of the Company, claiming securities fraud by the Company with respect to the Series A Shares purchased
from Grisaffi and other common stock allegedly purchased by LSW and Li, as well as fraud, breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation
by the Company. LSW seeks $10,000,000 in damages from the Company, for the $3,500,000 which was paid to Grisaffi for the Series
A shares and for which LSW claims to be the responsibility of the Company to cover, and the remaining $6,500,000 for money allegedly
spent by LSW in “developing a distribution system in China” and other alleged “investments” of Li and LSW
in the Company. LSW and Li also sought exemplary damages.
On August 30, 2018,
the Trial Court entered a final judgment and order in the Company’s favor and against Grisaffi. On August 29, 2018, after
a show cause hearing, the Trial Court entered an order sanctioning Grisaffi for his repeated and unexcused refusals to make discovery
in the case. As a sanction, the Trial Court struck Grisaffi’s pleadings in the case and, on August 30, 2018, entered a Default
Judgment against him. Under the Trial Court’s Default Judgment:
|
1.
|
The Court entered a monetary judgment against
Grisaffi and in favor of the Company in the amount of $3,500,000 for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and conversion with respect
to the Series A preferred stock.
|
|
2.
|
The Court declared that the Employment Agreement
with Grisaffi dated April 1, 2013 was void
ab initio
and unenforceable, and that all stock and promissory notes issued in
connection with the Employment Agreement were also void
ab initio
and of no force and effect, including but not limited
to:
|
|
a.
|
The 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued to Grisaffi;
|
|
b.
|
The Convertible Promissory Note issued to Grisaffi in the principal amount of $184,300 dated
April 1, 2016; and
|
|
c.
|
The Convertible Promissory Note issued to Grisaffi in the principal amount of $200,150 dated
June 19, 2017.
|
|
3.
|
The Court declared that Grisaffi’s sale
of the Series A Preferred Stock to LSW was made with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors and was thus a fraudulent
transfer under Texas law.
|
|
4.
|
The Court declared that the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Li and the 11,000,000
shares of common stock issued to Epic One Group, LLC were made without lawful consideration, and constituted breaches of fiduciary
duty by Grisaffi.
|
|
5.
|
The Court declared that an Indemnification was procured through
fraud and breach of fiduciary duty and is therefore void and unenforceable.
|
|
6.
|
The Court ruled that Grisaffi shall take nothing by his counterclaims in the case.
|
Furthermore, the
Court ruled that our continuing claims against the other defendants in the case were to be severed and docketed under a separate
cause of action and case number. We have continued to pursue our claims against the other defendants in the below referenced case.
The judgment and
order entered August 30, 2018 concludes our litigation in district court as against Grisaffi. On September 4, 2018, Mr. Grisaffi
filed a Notice of Appeal in the case against him.
In The Court Of Appeals For The Fifth
District Of Texas Dallas, Texas, Jerry Grisaffi, Appellant v. Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc, f/k/a Republic of Texas Brands,
Inc., Appellee, No. 05-18-01020-CV.
Grisaffi has filed
an appeal of the Default Judgment, and submitted his brief on or about February 28, 2019. The Company is preparing its brief which
is currently due April 1, 2019. Grisaffi did not appeal the Order Dismissing Derivative Claims. Grisaffi only seeks in his appeal
to reverse in part the Default Judgment by striking the paragraph awarding monetary damages, leaving the remainder of the Default
Judgment intact.
Dallas County Texas,
Case Number DC-18-13491. Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. f/k/a Republic of Texas Brands, Inc. Plaintiff, vs. Joe Radcliffe, LSW
Holdings, LLC, Lily Li, Epic Group One, LLC, Kenneth Radcliffe, Dennis Radcliffe, Phil Uhrik, Michael Radcliffe, Frank Izzo, Morgan
Albright, John Garrison, BB Winks, LLC, Crackerjack Classic, LLC, and Universal Consulting, LLC.
This is the surviving
case of the above case, having been severed on September 12, 2018. In this case, on October 26, 2018 the Court granted our Motion
For Summary Judgment, per a Summary Judgment Order, against LSW, holding that all Series A Preferred Shares in RMHB, including
the shares issued to Grisaffi and later sold by him to LSW evidenced by Stock Certificate N0. 604 issued by RMHB, to LSW Holdings
LLC in the amount of 1,000,000 shares, were
void ab initio
, and any potential rights thereunder were terminated as of July
11, 2014, when the bankruptcy court signed the Order Confirming Debtor’s Amended Plan of Reorganization. The Series A Preferred
Shares have no legal force or effect. The Court also granted a take nothing judgment against LSW on counterclaim Counts 1, 2 and
3. The Company’s transfer agent has cancelled the Series A Preferred Shares. Later, on November 26, 2018, the Court entered
an Order of Sanctions against Li and LSW. In the Order of Sanctions, and in response to Li and LSW’s repeated refusals to
make proper discovery in the case, the Court struck the pleadings of these parties and ruled that RMHB was entitled to take a default
judgment against them.
On February 4, 2019, the
Court entered its Default Judgment against Li and LSW. In the Default Judgment, the Court ruled as follows:
|
1.
|
The Employment Agreement with Grisaffi dated
April 1, 2013 was void
ab initio
and unenforceable, and that all stock or other instruments issued on the basis or authority
of that Employment Agreement were also void
ab initio
and of no force and effect;
|
|
2.
|
The Series A Preferred Shares that RMHB issued
to Grisaffi and later sold by Grisaffi to LSW were void
ab initio
and any potential rights or remedies thereunder were terminated
on July 11, 2014 pursuant to the Order Confirming Debtor’s Amended Plan of Reorganization;
|
|
3.
|
Grisaffi’s issuance and transfer to
himself of the 1,000,000 Series A Preferred Shares, and his subsequent transfer of those shares to LSW Holdings, were fraudulent
transfers and are voided and set aside;
|
|
4.
|
Grisaffi breached his fiduciary duties to
RMHB by, among other things: (i), purporting to sell the Series A Preferred Shares to LSW, (ii) causing the issuance of 11,000,000
shares of common stock to Epic Group One, LLC, and 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Li for no consideration, and (iii) causing
the issuance of 113,688,625 shares to the Radcliffe Group at deeply discounted prices;
|
|
5.
|
LSW and Li knowingly participated in Grisaffi’s
breaches of fiduciary duty and are therefore jointly and severally liable for all damages and equitable relief arising from such
breaches;
|
|
6.
|
The issuance of 10,000,000 shares of common
stock to Li was not authorized by the Board of Directors and was both void
ab initio
and a fraudulent conveyance;
|
|
7.
|
RMHB is entitled to recover all damages proximately
resulting from the improper issuance of the 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Li;
|
|
8.
|
Li did not perform and materially breached her agreement to raise money for RMHB;
|
|
9.
|
The 10,000,000 shares of purported common stock issued to Li belongs
to RMHB and Li has no further rights or remedies arising out of or related to the 10,000,000 shares;
|
|
10.
|
By virtue of their actions described above,
Li and LSW have taken advantage of RMHB and have unjustly enriched themselves at Rocky Mountain High Brands’ expense, and
RMHB is entitled to full restitution of all its losses and damages;
|
|
11.
|
LSW Holdings and Li engaged in a civil conspiracy
with Grisaffi to commit the wrongs against RMHB described above, and RMHB is entitled to recover from them actual, consequential,
and special damages resulting from such wrongs, including their knowing participation in Grisaffi’s breaches of fiduciary
duty, breaches of contract, receipt of fraudulent conveyances, and unjust enrichments.
|
|
12.
|
The torts against RMHB committed by LSW Holdings
and Li were aggravated by fraud and malice, and RMHB is therefore entitled to exemplary damages.
|
|
13.
|
LSW Holdings and Li shall take nothing by their counterclaims; and
|
|
14.
|
RMHB is entitled to court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees from LSW Holdings and Li.
|
The amount of damages
and attorneys’ fees to be awarded to RMHB and against LSW Holdings and Li will be determined in a trial currently scheduled
for June 3, 2019. We are continuing to pursue our claims against the remaining defendants in the case, which will be adjudicated
at trial, currently scheduled for June 3, 2019.
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc. v La Dolce Vita Trust and Christine Guthrie, In Her Capacity As Trustee, In The 382
nd
District Court of Rockwall County, Texas, Cause No. 1-18-1608.
This is a case whereby
the Company is attempting to collect on the Default Judgment obtained against Grisaffi. More specifically the Company is requesting
the Court to order the La Dolce Vita Trust to turnover fraudulently transferred assets and for additional relief necessary to enforce
the Company’s judgment against Grisaffi.
Chet – 5 Broadcasting,
Inc. v Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc., Supreme Court of the State of New Your, County of Ulster, Case No. 18-4416.
The Plaintiff sued
the Company, seeking $21,000.00 in damages for breach of contract. The Company is contesting that claim in its entirety and has
filed a counterclaim against the Plaintiff for an unspecified amount of damages. This case is new and the parties have not yet
conducted any discovery.
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of April
22, 2019, the name, age and positions of our executive officers and directors.
NAME
|
AGE
|
POSITION
|
Michael Welch
|
65
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
Jens Mielke
|
52
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
David Seeberger
|
63
|
Director and Vice President, Legal
|
|
|
|
Charles Smith
|
62
|
Director and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
Winton Morrison
|
80
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Dean Blythe
|
60
|
Director
|
The business background and certain other
information about our directors and executive officers is set forth below:
MICHAEL WELCH – CHAIRMAN OF THE
BOARD, PRESIDENT, AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Michael Welch joined
the Company in January 2016 as Chief Financial Officer. He was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer in February 2016.
In September 2017 Mr. Welch was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors.
Mr. Welch brings more than
thirty years of executive and financial management experience to the Rocky Mountain High Brands team. Prior to joining RMHB, Mr.
Welch served as CFO Managing Partner for Aventine Hill Partners, a professional services firm from July 2014 to December 2015.
Mr. Welch served as Chief Financial Officer and Consultant for multiple small cap companies in Dallas, Texas from June 2011 to
June 2014. Mr. Welch was the Chief Financial Officer and one of the founders of Stephan Pyles Concepts, a Dallas-based, privately-held
restaurant holding company from February 2005 to May 2011.
In the late 90’s,
Mr. Welch was part of the founders group of Resources Global Professionals (RGP), a publicly-traded, international consulting firm
that was initially owned by Deloitte. Prior to his involvement with RGP, for more than ten years Mr. Welch was employed by Landmark
Land Company, a publicly traded multi-state real estate developer and operator of golf and tennis resorts and hotels, commercial
and residential real estate, life insurance, mortgage and savings and loans. His positions included Chief Operating Officer, Vice
President of Management Systems, and Controller. Mr. Welch also served as Chief Financial Officer of Oak Tree Savings Bank, a subsidiary
of Landmark Land Company and a statewide savings and loan based in New Orleans, LA.
Mr. Welch is an alumnus
of the audit staff at Deloitte and joined the firm immediately after earning a Bachelor of Business Administration from the University
of Oklahoma. Mr. Welch is a Louisiana CPA (inactive status) and has recently completed a term on a not-for-profit board. Mr. Welch
currently serves on an Advisory Board for a privately held services company with which he directed a management-led buyout from
the founder of the company. Mr. Welch serves on the Board of Directors of the U.S. Hemp Roundtable.
JENS MIELKE – CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
Jens Mielke joined the Company
in August 2016 as Chief Financial Officer.
Mr. Mielke has over 28
years’ experience in accounting and finance leadership positions. Prior to joining RMHB, Mr. Mielke was National Partner,
Technical Accounting for Aventine Hill Partners, a Texas-based professional services firm. He founded and led that firm’s
Technical Accounting Group where he provided technical accounting and finance services to public and private clients. Prior to
Aventine Hill, Mr. Mielke was Chief Financial Officer for a high-growth, publicly-traded retailer, but spent the majority of his
career at Deloitte where he was audit partner in the firm’s Dallas office. He also previously served as senior financial
analyst at PepsiCo’s corporate headquarters in Purchase, NY. His experience includes working with public and private companies
in strategic management, accounting, financial reporting, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, investor relations, initial and secondary
public offerings, mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, process improvement and systems implementations.
Mr. Mielke received his
Master and Bachelor of Business Administration degrees from Southern Methodist University.
DAVID SEEBERGER – DIRECTOR
AND VICE PRESIDENT, LEGAL
David Seeberger joined
the Company in March 2016 as Vice President, Legal. In September 2017 Mr. Seeberger was appointed to the Board of Directors.
Mr. Seeberger received
his B.A. from Grinnell College in Grinnell, Iowa and earned his J.D. from the University of Toledo - College of Law in Toledo,
Ohio. Mr. Seeberger is admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of Texas and the United States District Courts for the Northern
and Eastern Districts of Texas. He has also practiced in other State and Federal Courts on a pro hoc basis. Mr. Seeberger is also
admitted to practice before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Mr. Seeberger’s legal
experience spans in excess of twenty-five years of professional practice within the Dallas, Texas area. Mr. Seeberger has been
privileged to associate with and has been a partner in various small law firms throughout his legal career – for the past
decade, Mr. Seeberger has been in private practice, and maintains membership in the State Bar of Texas and the Dallas Bar Association.
Mr. Seeberger’s career
has included all areas of corporate and small business - due diligence, corporate and business litigation as well as the areas
associated therewith, including general legal counsel for corporate, real estate and commercial bankruptcy proceedings and corporate
turnaround efforts. Mr. Seeberger is an AV Preeminent rated attorney resulting from the AV Preeminent-Peer Review Rating as conducted
by Martindale-Hubbell. Mr. Seeberger has been engaged, contracted with, or employed by RMHB since 2012.
CHARLES SMITH – DIRECTOR,
CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER, AND PRESIDENT OF EAGLE SPIRIT LAND AND WATER COMPANY
Charles (Chuck) Smith
joined the Company in February 2016 as a Director and Chief Operating Officer. In November 2016, Mr. Smith was also appointed President
of Eagle Spirit Land & Water Company.
Within the last six
years, Mr. Smith has served in several key strategic roles entailing a wide-range of corporate governance. During the time period
from 2007 to 2014, Mr. Smith served as a Managing Partner and Managing Member of San Carlos Associates, a multi-million-dollar
investment entity located in Dallas, Texas. In addition, until the properties recently sold in 2011, Mr. Smith served as a former
Managing Partner and Managing member to several investment partnerships in Midland and El Paso, Texas, with indicated values that
exceed $30 million. These properties included Cornerstone Village and Villa De Madison. Similarly, Mr. Smith currently retains
a partnership interest and maintains a consulting relationship at Sawyers Mill in Arlington, Texas – an entity that he has
maintained a relationship with since the early 1990’s.
Mr. Smith graduated with
honors from University of Texas at Dallas with a Bachelor's Degree in Economics and Finance. He has been an active participant
in real estate investment opportunities for almost 35 years.
WINTON MORRISON – INDEPENDENT
DIRECTOR
Winton “Win”
Morrison joined the Company in February 2016 as a Director.
Mr. Morrison is Principal
Broker and Owner of Win Morrison Realty. Mr. Morrison spent many years as an IBM executive, based in the former IBM Kingston facility.
He operated his own retail business for a time (the Snowflake Ski Shop), and also worked as an antique dealer for most of his adult
life. Mr. Morrison opened the Kingston office of Win Morrison Realty in 1982. Win Morrison Realty now has five offices to serve
the region. Currently, the company is actively pursuing expansion into other locations within other parts of the region.
DEAN BLYTHE – INDEPENDENT
DIRECTOR
Dean Blythe joined the
Company in March 2018 as a Director.
Mr. Blythe is the Founder
and Managing Partner of TDF Resources, an advisory and investment firm he founded in January 2009 that provides advisory, management,
and transaction services to public and private companies across a wide spectrum of industries. Mr. Blythe served on the Board
of Directors of Journal Communications, Inc., an NYSE-listed company, from 2013 until its sale in 2015. Mr. Blythe served
on the Board of Directors of Total Outdoor Corp. from 2011 to 2013 and served as its Co-President and Chief Financial Officer from
2012 to 2013. From 2001 to 2009, Mr. Blythe was with Harte-Hanks, Inc., a NYSE-listed direct and targeted marketing services
company. He served in various roles at Harte-Hanks, including as a member of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive
Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Vice President – Legal. Prior to joining Harte-Hanks,
Mr. Blythe served as Senior Vice President – Corporate Development & General Counsel of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc.,
a NYSE-listed company, and its predecessor, Argyle Television, Inc. Mr. Blythe previously served on the Boards of Directors of
Argyle Security, Inc., where he chaired its Audit Committee, and New Vision Television, Inc.
Mr. Blythe holds a Juris Doctor
degree from Duke University and a Bachelor of Science degree from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships
between or among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.
Involvement in Certain
Legal Proceedings
To the best of our knowledge,
during the past ten years, none of the following occurred with respect to a present or former director, executive officer, or employee:
(1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either
at the time of the bankruptcy or within
two
years prior to that time other than the
Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding of the Company in 2013 - 2014; (2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to
a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment
or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily
enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities;
and (4) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission
to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.
On December 16, 2013
the Company filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas
Division, Case Number 13-36434-bjh-11. In early 2013, the Company sought to acquire a barbeque company and sought to raise capital
and entered into an agreement with Empire Capital LLC (“Empire”) to assist in the raising of capital for the acquisition.
By late 2013, the acquisition had fallen through due to the inability to obtain the needed financing. Empire then sued the Company
claiming it was owed approximately $200,000 for its services on behalf of the Company along with additional damages. The Company
disputed the claims and filed the Chapter 11 bankruptcy to restructure its current indebtedness and to provide a framework for
moving forward. On May 22, 2014 the Company filed its Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization, and on July 2, 2014 a hearing
was held and the Plan of Reorganization was confirmed by written order of the Bankruptcy Court dated July 11, 2014.
The material terms of
the Order Confirming Debtor’s Plan of Reorganization (the “Bankruptcy Order”) are contained within the Amended
Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”). The Plan was a consensual plan, in that a majority of all creditors in all classes
and the equity holders voting voted to accept the Plan. The fundamental material terms of the Plan relate to the allowance or disallowance
of claims and treatment of allowed claims and classes of claims, and then to the means for execution of the Plan.
The Plan created five
classes of creditors. The Plan contained a separate and distinct obligation of the Company for each of the classes of creditors.
The treatment of the Company’s obligation for each class was set forth in Article 5 of the Plan. The Class 1 Claimants consisted
of allowed administrative claims and were to be paid in full on the effective date of the Plan. The only Class 1 Claimant was the
Debtor’s attorney,
who
was paid in full after Court approval of his fee application.
Class 2 Claimants consisted of allowed non-insider general unsecured claims. Those Class 2 Claimants were to be paid in full on
their claims by receiving 5% of their allowed claim on the effective date of the Plan, and the remainder in 60 equal monthly payments.
The Class 3 Claimants consisted of allowed insider general unsecured claims. The Class 3 Claimants consisted of three claimants
and their claims were resolved by the issuance of stock of the Debtor. Class 4 Claimants consisted of the allowed claims of the
Empire Group, as defined in Class 4. The Class 4 Claimants consisted of four claimants and their claims were resolved by the settlement
of pending bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy litigation and other matters with the Class 4 Claimants, which included the return of
shares of Debtor’s stock to treasury by one claimant of that Class and the issuance of other shares and delivery of a payment
of $50,000.00 to another claimant of that Class. Class 5 Claimants consisted of allowed equity interest holders, and those claimants
retained their shares of stock in the Debtor.
The means for execution
of the Plan are set forth in Article 6 of the Plan, which contains the matters to be addressed by the Company, primarily those
dealing with the obligations to the classes of creditors.
Committees of the Board
On February 5, 2019, the
Board of Directors formed three committees of the Board of Directors: Executive Committee, Litigation Committee, and the Nominations
Committee. Michael Welch, Charles Smith, David Seeberger, and Dean Blythe are members of each of these committees. Until further
determination by the Board, the full Board of Directors will continue to undertake the duties of the Audit Committee and Compensation
Committee. Prior to this meeting, there were no committees of the Board of Directors.
Nominating Committee
On February 5, 2019 our Board
of Directors formed a nominating committee with Michael Welch, Charles Smith, David Seeberger, and Dean Blythe as members. Currently,
no written charter governs the director nomination process. When evaluating director nominees, our directors consider the following
factors:
|
•
|
The appropriate size of our Board of Directors;
|
|
•
|
Our needs with respect to the particular talents and experience of our directors;
|
|
•
|
The knowledge, skills and experience of nominees, including experience
in finance, administration or public service, in light of prevailing business conditions and the knowledge, skills and experience
already possessed by other members of the Board;
|
|
•
|
Experience in political affairs;
|
|
•
|
Experience with accounting rules and practices; and
|
|
•
|
The desire to balance the benefit of continuity with the periodic
injection of the fresh perspective provided by new Board members.
|
Our goal is to assemble a Board that brings
together a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high quality business and professional experience. In doing so, the
Board will also consider candidates with appropriate non-business backgrounds.
Other than the foregoing,
there are no stated
minimum
criteria for director nominees, although the Board may
also consider such other factors as it may deem are in our best interests as well as our stockholders. In addition, the Board identifies
nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board willing to continue in service. Current members of the Board with
skills and experience that are relevant to our business and
who
are willing to continue
in service are considered for re-nomination. If any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service or if the Board decides
not to re-nominate a member for re-election, the Board then identifies the desired skills and experience of a new nominee in light
of the criteria above. Current members of the Board are polled for suggestions as to individuals meeting the criteria described
above. The Board may also engage in research to identify qualified individuals. To date,
we
have not engaged third parties to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying potential nominees, although
we
reserve the right in the future to retain a third-party search firm, if necessary. The Board does not typically consider
shareholder nominees because it believes that its current nomination process is sufficient to identify directors
who
serve our best interests.
Audit Committee
We do not have a separately
designated standing audit committee. The entire Board of Directors performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written
charter governs the actions of the Board when performing the functions of what would generally be performed by an audit committee.
The Board approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and interacts with the independent accountants to discuss
issues related to financial reporting. In addition, the Board reviews the scope and results of the audit with the independent accountants,
reviews with management and the independent accountants our annual operating results, considers the adequacy of our internal accounting
procedures and considers other auditing and accounting matters including fees to be paid to the independent auditor and the performance
of the independent auditor.
Advisory Board to the
Board of Directors
In March 2018 the Board of Directors formed
an informal Advisory Board consisting of non-employee members who provide advice to the Board of Directors. The Advisory Board
was dissolved on October 31, 2018.
Code of Conduct
In August 2017 the Company
adopted a Code of Conduct for all directors, officers, employees, and contractors.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We are a reporting company
and file annual, quarterly and special reports, and other information with the SEC. Copies of the reports and other information
may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can request copies
of such documents by writing to the SEC and paying a fee for the copying cost. You may obtain information on the operation of the
Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a web site at
http://www.sec.gov
that contains
reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC.
This prospectus is part
of a registration statement on Form S-1 that we filed with the SEC. Certain information in the registration statement has been
omitted from this prospectus in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. We have also filed exhibits and schedules
with the registration statement that are excluded from this prospectus. For further information you may:
|
·
|
read a copy of the registration statement, including the exhibits
and schedules, without charge at the SEC’s Public Reference Room; or
|
|
·
|
obtain a copy from the SEC upon payment of the fees prescribed by the SEC.
|
Index to Financial Statements Required by Article 8
of Regulation S-X:
Audited Financial Statements:
F-1
|
Report of Prager Metis, CPAs, LLC, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-2
|
Report of Paritz & Company, P.A., Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-3
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017
|
F-4
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and the six months ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
|
F-5
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and the six months ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
|
F-6
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017
|
F-7
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s Deficit for the six months ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
|
F-8
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
Unaudited
Financial Statements:
F-24
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (unaudited);
|
F-25
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 (unaudited);
|
F-26
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 (unaudited);
|
F-27
|
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders’ Deficit for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 (unaudited);
|
F-28
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of
Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial
Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet of Rocky Mountain Brands, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2018, and the related consolidated statement of operations,
stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred
to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements
have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company has a shareholders’ deficit of $702,555, an accumulated deficit of $35,018,351 as of December 31,
2017, and has generated operating losses since inception. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3 to the
accompanying financial statements. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from
the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with
the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required
to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are
required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures
to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing
procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Prager Metis CPA’s LLC
|
|
|
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018.
|
|
|
Hackensack, New Jersey
|
April 12, 2019
|
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial
Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet of Rocky Mountain Brands, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2017, and the related consolidated statement of operations,
stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the six months ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred
to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
the six months ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated
financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with
the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required
to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are
required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures
to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing
procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The accompanying financial statements
have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company has a shareholders’ deficit, an accumulated deficit, and a working capital deficit as of December
31, 2017, and has generated operating losses since inception. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt regarding the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described
in Note 3 to the accompanying financial statements. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Paritz & Company, P.A.
|
|
|
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.
|
|
|
Hackensack, New Jersey
|
April 2, 2018
|
|
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
613,686
|
|
|
$
|
16,983
|
Accounts Receivable,
net of allowance of $5,275 and $195,632, respectively
|
|
|
17,324
|
|
|
|
2,844
|
Inventory
|
|
|
146,722
|
|
|
|
82,312
|
Prepaid
Expenses and Other Current Assets
|
|
|
388,074
|
|
|
|
634,722
|
TOTAL
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
1,165,806
|
|
|
|
736,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment,
net
|
|
|
34,280
|
|
|
|
35,681
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
148,647
|
|
|
|
—
|
Other
Assets
|
|
|
26,245
|
|
|
|
29,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
$
|
1,374,978
|
|
|
$
|
801,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable and
Accrued Liabilities
|
|
$
|
505,214
|
|
|
$
|
750,807
|
Related Party Convertible
Notes Payable, net of debt discount
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
174,456
|
Convertible Notes Payable,
net of debt discount
|
|
|
666,596
|
|
|
|
677,698
|
Notes Payable
|
|
|
37,493
|
|
|
|
549,936
|
Redemption Value of
Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Accrued Interest
|
|
|
25,758
|
|
|
|
81,248
|
Deferred Revenue
|
|
|
466,300
|
|
|
|
—
|
Derivative
Liability
|
|
|
376,172
|
|
|
|
5,609,389
|
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
2,077,533
|
|
|
|
7,843,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock - Series A - Par Value of
$.001; 1,000,000 shares designated; No shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and
1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
Preferred Stock - Series B - Par Value of
$.001; 7,000,000 shares designated; No shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Preferred Stock - Series C - Par Value of
$.001; 2,000,000 shares designated; No shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Preferred Stock - Series D - Par Value of
$.001; 2,000,000 shares designated; No shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and December
31, 2017
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Preferred Stock - Series E - Par Value of
$.001; 789,474 shares designated; No shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Common Stock - Par Value of
$.001; 4,000,000,000 shares authorized as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017; 1,891,617,372 shares
issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2018; 1,159,706,457 shares issued and outstanding as
of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
1,891,617
|
|
|
|
1,159,706
|
Additional Paid-In
Capital
|
|
|
32,424,179
|
|
|
|
23,459,809
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
(35,018,351
|
)
|
|
|
(31,662,414)
|
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
(702,555
|
)
|
|
|
(7,041,899)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
$
|
1,374,978
|
|
|
$
|
801,635
|
The
Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Consolidated Financial Statements
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
379,238
|
|
|
$
|
141,289
|
|
|
$
|
59,653
|
|
|
$
|
320,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
385,673
|
|
|
|
132,216
|
|
|
|
79,933
|
|
|
|
98,639
|
Inventory
Obsolescence
|
|
|
25,145
|
|
|
|
165,271
|
|
|
|
93,110
|
|
|
|
28,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit (Loss)
|
|
|
(31,580
|
)
|
|
|
(156,198
|
)
|
|
|
(113,390
|
)
|
|
|
192,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and Administrative
|
|
|
3,689,175
|
|
|
|
6,465,861
|
|
|
|
2,567,486
|
|
|
|
1,853,089
|
Advertising and Marketing
|
|
|
833,933
|
|
|
|
882,765
|
|
|
|
118,191
|
|
|
|
749,059
|
Impairment
Expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
59,163
|
|
|
|
59,163
|
|
|
|
—
|
Total
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
4,523,108
|
|
|
|
7,407,789
|
|
|
|
2,744,840
|
|
|
|
2,602,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Operations
|
|
|
(4,554,688
|
)
|
|
|
(7,563,987
|
)
|
|
|
(2,858,230
|
)
|
|
|
(2,409,286)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
(Income)/Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
1,275,693
|
|
|
|
2,700,221
|
|
|
|
2,054,438
|
|
|
|
398,648
|
(Gain) Loss on Extinguishment
of Debt
|
|
|
191,138
|
|
|
|
(1,200,092
|
)
|
|
|
(1,200,092
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
(Gain) Loss on Change
in Redemption Value of Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(834,242
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
(Gain) Loss on Lawsuit
Judgment and Legal Settlement
|
|
|
(689,724
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
(Gain)
Loss on Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability
|
|
|
(1,975,858
|
)
|
|
|
3,413,465
|
|
|
|
1,795,205
|
|
|
|
332,759
|
Total
Other (Income) Expenses
|
|
|
(1,198,751
|
)
|
|
|
4,079,352
|
|
|
|
2,649,551
|
|
|
|
731,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Before Income
Tax Provision
|
|
|
(3,355,937
|
)
|
|
|
(11,643,339
|
)
|
|
|
(5,507,781
|
)
|
|
|
(3,140,693)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Tax Provision
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
$
|
(3,355,937
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,643,339
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,507,781
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,140,693)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss per
Common Share - Basic and Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.00)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
1,605,719,345
|
|
|
|
813,528,472
|
|
|
|
855,469,994
|
|
|
|
629,289,895
|
The
Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Consolidated Financial Statements
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(3,355,937
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,643,339
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,507,781
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,140,693)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
456,007
|
|
|
|
1,976,388
|
|
|
|
468,291
|
|
|
|
409,062
|
Stock-based
payments to vendors
|
|
|
80,445
|
|
|
|
548,084
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
465,267
|
Warrants
and options issued for services rendered
|
|
|
108,205
|
|
|
|
1,846,944
|
|
|
|
180,163
|
|
|
|
407,447
|
Non-cash
interest expense
|
|
|
1,160,857
|
|
|
|
2,700,220
|
|
|
|
2,054,438
|
|
|
|
398,649
|
Fees and
penalties on debt
|
|
|
120,251
|
|
|
|
729,929
|
|
|
|
729,929
|
|
|
|
—
|
Gain on
change in redemption value of Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(834,242
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Gain on
lawsuit judgment and legal settlement
|
|
|
(689,724
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
(Gain) Loss
on change in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
(1,975,858
|
)
|
|
|
3,413,465
|
|
|
|
1,795,205
|
|
|
|
332,759
|
(Gain)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
191,138
|
|
|
|
(1,200,092
|
)
|
|
|
(1,200,092
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
Bad debt
expense
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
246,520
|
|
|
|
61,554
|
|
|
|
—
|
Loss on
disposal of equipment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15,912
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43,221
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
|
|
34,423
|
|
|
|
25,211
|
|
|
|
13,116
|
|
|
|
18,691
|
Impairment
expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
59,163
|
|
|
|
59,163
|
|
|
|
—
|
Inventory
obsolescence
|
|
|
25,145
|
|
|
|
165,271
|
|
|
|
93,110
|
|
|
|
28,837
|
Changes in operating
assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
(16,017
|
)
|
|
|
13,064
|
|
|
|
(1,131
|
)
|
|
|
(242,052)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(89,556
|
)
|
|
|
(29,312
|
)
|
|
|
49,273
|
|
|
|
43,260
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
(22,076
|
)
|
|
|
(169,470
|
)
|
|
|
3,966
|
|
|
|
164,928
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(12,765
|
)
|
|
|
(7,569
|
)
|
|
|
(11,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,431)
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(211,156
|
)
|
|
|
194,531
|
|
|
|
375,462
|
|
|
|
284,253
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
466,300
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
NET
CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(3,728,782
|
)
|
|
|
(1,949,322
|
)
|
|
|
(836,334
|
)
|
|
|
(789,802)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
in other assets
|
|
|
(31,220
|
)
|
|
|
(4,252
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(39,774)
|
Cash
acquired in business acquisition
|
|
|
15,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
of property and equipment
|
|
|
(18,307
|
)
|
|
|
(10,705
|
)
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
|
(36,635)
|
Disposal
of property and equipment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
—
|
NET
CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(33,915
|
)
|
|
|
(14,125
|
)
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
|
|
(76,409)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of convertible notes
|
|
|
877,500
|
|
|
|
590,000
|
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
330,000
|
Repayment
of convertible notes
|
|
|
(172,932
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Proceeds
from issuance of related party convertible notes
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
289,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,600
|
Repayment
of related party convertible notes
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Proceeds
from issuance of notes payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
440,000
|
|
|
|
440,000
|
|
|
|
35,960
|
Repayment
of notes payable
|
|
|
(14,672
|
)
|
|
|
(11,831
|
)
|
|
|
(6,194
|
)
|
|
|
(4,193)
|
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
3,669,504
|
|
|
|
543,200
|
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
456,650
|
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
4,359,400
|
|
|
|
1,825,369
|
|
|
|
762,306
|
|
|
|
919,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE
(DECREASE) IN CASH
|
|
|
596,703
|
|
|
|
(138,078
|
)
|
|
|
(74,692
|
)
|
|
|
52,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
- BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
16,983
|
|
|
|
155,061
|
|
|
|
91,675
|
|
|
|
102,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
- END OF PERIOD
|
|
$
|
613,686
|
|
|
$
|
16,983
|
|
|
$
|
16,983
|
|
|
$
|
155,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
56,742
|
|
|
$
|
1,654
|
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
|
$
|
705
|
Cash paid for taxes
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock issued for conversion of debt
|
|
$
|
4,000,604
|
|
|
$
|
3,056,572
|
|
|
$
|
3,055,140
|
|
|
$
|
188,023
|
Common
stock issued for acquisition
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
Common
stock issued as part of legal settlement
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,439,975
|
|
|
$
|
1,439,975
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
Debt
and accrued interest converted for common stock
|
|
$
|
499,053
|
|
|
$
|
3,951,186
|
|
|
$
|
3,889,083
|
|
|
$
|
442,633
|
Derivative
liability relieved upon conversion of related debt
|
|
$
|
3,021,935
|
|
|
$
|
5,310,518
|
|
|
$
|
5,276,018
|
|
|
$
|
318,125
|
Derivative
liability incurred for debt discount
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,676,772
|
|
|
$
|
4,017,622
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
Beneficial
conversion feature recognized as debt discount
|
|
$
|
1,351,790
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
212,771
|
Series
C Preferred Stock redeemed for common stock
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,661,424
|
|
|
$
|
1,661,424
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
The
Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Consolidated Financial Statements
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Consolidated
Statement of Shareholders' Deficit for the Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock A
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock C
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
APIC
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
|
Equity/(Deficit)
|
Balance
- December 31, 2017
|
|
|
1,159,706,457
|
|
|
$
|
1,159,706
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23,459,809
|
|
|
$
|
(31,662,414
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,041,899)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for cash
|
|
|
386,051,448
|
|
|
|
386,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,283,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,669,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for compensation
|
|
|
13,597,469
|
|
|
|
13,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
issued for stock option exercises
|
|
|
29,096,402
|
|
|
|
29,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options issued for
compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued upon
conversion of convertible notes
|
|
|
289,370,558
|
|
|
|
289,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,731,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,021,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares to vendors for
services rendered
|
|
|
8,150,531
|
|
|
|
8,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for acquisition
|
|
|
7,462,688
|
|
|
|
7,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares returned as
part of lawsuit judgment and legal settlement
|
|
|
(1,818,181
|
)
|
|
|
(1,818
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,818)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial conversion
feature recognized on convertible notes payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,554,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,554,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss for the year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,355,937
|
)
|
|
|
(3,355,937)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
- December 31, 2018
|
|
|
1,891,617,372
|
|
|
$
|
1,891,617
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
32,424,179
|
|
|
$
|
(35,018,351
|
)
|
|
$
|
(702,555)
|
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Consolidated
Statement of Shareholders' Deficit for the Year Ended December 31, 2017
(Unaudited)
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Preferred
Stock A
|
|
Preferred
Stock C
|
|
Preferred
Stock E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
APIC
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
Equity/(Deficit)
|
Balance
- December 31, 2016
|
|
|
735,080,314
|
|
|
$
|
735,081
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
14,727,383
|
|
|
$
|
(20,019,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,555,611)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for cash
|
|
|
24,682,293
|
|
|
|
24,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
518,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for compensation
|
|
|
700,550
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
789,474
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
29,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant exercise
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares converted
to common shares
|
|
|
789,474
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(789,474
|
)
|
|
|
(789
|
)
|
|
|
14,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued upon
conversion of convertible notes
|
|
|
323,331,050
|
|
|
|
323,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,872,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,195,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options issued
to Board members and employees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,642,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,642,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares to vendors for
services rendered
|
|
|
28,622,776
|
|
|
|
28,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,266,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,294,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued as part
of a legal settlement
|
|
|
45,000,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,356,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,401,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial conversion
feature recognized on convertible notes payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss for the year ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(11,643,339
|
)
|
|
|
(11,643,339)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
- December 31, 2017
|
|
|
1,159,706,457
|
|
|
$
|
1,159,706
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23,459,809
|
|
|
$
|
(31,662,414
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,041,899)
|
The
Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Consolidated Financial Statements
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Consolidated
Statement of Shareholders' Deficit for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Preferred
Stock A
|
|
Preferred
Stock C
|
|
Preferred
Stock E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
APIC
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
Equity/(Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - June 30, 2017
|
|
|
786,525,118
|
|
|
$
|
786,525
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
18,062,830
|
|
|
$
|
(26,154,633
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,304,278)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for cash
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
789,474
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
14,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares converted
to common shares
|
|
|
789,474
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(789,474
|
)
|
|
|
(789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options issued
to Board members and employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued upon
conversion of convertible notes
|
|
|
321,291,865
|
|
|
|
321,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,626,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,947,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options issued
for services rendered
|
|
|
5,600,000
|
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued as part
of a legal settlement
|
|
|
45,000,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,394,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,439,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the
six months ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5,507,781
|
)
|
|
|
(5,507,781)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
- December 31, 2017
|
|
|
1,159,706,457
|
|
|
$
|
1,159,706
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23,459,809
|
|
|
$
|
(31,662,414
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,041,899)
|
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Consolidated
Statement of Shareholders' Deficit for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Preferred
Stock A
|
|
Preferred
Stock C
|
|
Preferred
Stock E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
APIC
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
Equity/(Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - June 30, 2016
|
|
|
537,989,764
|
|
|
$
|
537,990
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
12,366,476
|
|
|
$
|
(16,878,382
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,972,916)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for cash
|
|
|
41,485,294
|
|
|
|
41,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
456,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for compensation
|
|
|
11,933,557
|
|
|
|
11,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for services
rendered
|
|
|
15,701,363
|
|
|
|
15,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued upon
conversion of convertible notes
|
|
|
75,761,502
|
|
|
|
75,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cashless warrant exercise
|
|
|
45,408,834
|
|
|
|
45,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued as part
of a legal settlement
|
|
|
6,800,000
|
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
499,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial conversion
feature on convertible related party notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the
six months ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,140,693
|
)
|
|
|
(3,140,693)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
- December 31, 2016
|
|
|
735,080,314
|
|
|
$
|
735,081
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
14,727,383
|
|
|
$
|
(20,019,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,555,611)
|
The
Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Consolidated Financial Statements
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE
1 – General
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc. (“RMHB” or the “Company”) is incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada.
On July 17, 2014, the Company changed its name from Republic of Texas Brands Incorporated to Totally Hemp Crazy, Inc and on October
23, 2014, the Company changed its name to Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc.
RMHB
currently operates through its parent company, three wholly-owned subsidiaries and one minority-owned subsidiary, which the Company
controls. All subsidiaries are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
RMHB
is a lifestyle brand management company that markets primarily CBD and hemp-infused products to health-conscious consumers. Our
products span various categories including beverage, food, fitness, and skin care. RMHB also markets a naturally high alkaline
spring water and a water-based protein drink with caffeine and B vitamins. All products comply with federal regulations on hemp
products and contain 0.0% tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive constituent of cannabis.
In
March 2018, the Company launched the HEMPd brand with gummies, water soluble drops, capsules, tinctures, lotions, and salves.
The Company introduced four flavors of CBD-infused waters in 12 oz. cans in November 2018.
In
July 2018, the Company acquired the assets of BFIT Brands, LLC and formed a new subsidiary, FitWhey Brands Inc. FitWhey markets
a line-up of five water-based protein drinks that include caffeine and B vitamins.
During
2017 and 2018, the Company continued to market its lineup of naturally flavored hemp-infused functional beverages, as well as
hemp-infused 2oz. Mango Energy Shots and Mixed Berry Energy Shots through the first half of 2018. The Company plans to introduce
updated offerings of hemp seed extract-infused functional beverages in the second quarter of 2019 under the name of Rocky Mountain.
NOTE
2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries.
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of the financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain of the Company’s estimates could be affected by external
conditions, including those unique to its industry, and general economic conditions. It is possible that these external factors
could have an effect on the Company’s estimates that could cause actual results to differ from its estimates. The Company
re-evaluates all of its accounting estimates at least quarterly based on these conditions and record adjustments when necessary.
Cash
The
Company considers all short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity at the date of purchase of three months or
less to be cash equivalents.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable
The
Company has a policy of reserving for uncollectible accounts based on the best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses
in our existing accounts receivable. We extend credit to customers based on an evaluation of their financial condition and other
factors. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable and perform ongoing
credit evaluations of customers and maintain an allowance for potential bad debts if required.
It
is determined whether an allowance for doubtful accounts is required by evaluating specific accounts where information indicates
the customers may have an inability to meet financial obligations. In these cases,
we
use
assumptions and judgment, based on the best available facts and circumstances, to record a specific allowance for those customers
against amounts due to reduce the receivable to the amount expected to be collected. These specific allowances are re-evaluated
and adjusted as additional information is received. The amounts calculated are analyzed to determine the total amount of the allowance.
The Company may also record a general allowance as necessary.
Direct
write-offs are taken in the period when we have exhausted our efforts to collect overdue and unpaid receivables or otherwise evaluate
other circumstances that indicate the collectability of receivables.
Inventories
Inventories,
which consist of the Company’s finished products held for resale, raw materials, and packaging, are stated at the lower
of cost, determined using the first-in, first-out, and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling
price, in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs to dispose of the product.
If
the Company identifies excess, obsolete or unsalable items, its inventories are written down to their realizable value in the
period in which the impairment is first identified. Shipping and handling costs incurred for inventory purchases and product shipments
are recorded in cost of sales in the Company’s statements of operations.
Fair
Value Measurements
The
Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which defines fair value
as used in numerous accounting pronouncements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair
value measurements.
The
estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable
and accrued expenses are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature
of these instruments. The carrying amounts of our short and long-term credit obligations approximate fair value because the effective
yields on these obligations, which include contractual interest rates taken together with other features such as concurrent issuances
of warrants and/or embedded conversion options, are comparable to rates of returns for instruments of similar credit risk.
ASC
820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price)
in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may
be used to measure fair value:
|
•
|
Level
1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
•
|
Level
2 — quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs
that are observable.
|
|
•
|
Level
3 — inputs that are unobservable (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on
assumptions).
|
The
derivative liability, which relates to the conversion feature of convertible debt and common stock warrants and options, is classified
as a Level 3 liability, and is the only financial liability measure at fair value on a recurring basis.
The
change in the Level 3 financial instruments is as follows:
Balance, June 30, 2017
|
|
$
|
5,072,579
|
Issued
|
|
|
4,017,623
|
Exercises/Conversions
|
|
$
|
(5,276,018)
|
Change in fair value recognized in operations
|
|
$
|
1,795,205
|
Balance, December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
5,609,389
|
Issued
|
|
$
|
—
|
Exercises/Conversions
|
|
$
|
(3,257,359)
|
Change in fair value recognized in operations
|
|
$
|
(1,975,858)
|
Balance, December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
376,172
|
The
estimated fair value of the derivative instruments was valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following
assumptions as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Estimated dividends
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
106%
|
|
|
165%
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
2.41%
|
|
|
1.39%
|
Expected term
|
|
|
.1 to 4.0 years
|
|
|
1
to 4.8 years
|
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided for on a straight-line basis over the
useful lives of the assets. Expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized; repairs and maintenance are expensed
as incurred.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The
Company evaluates intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of
an asset may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of the assets based on the undiscounted future cash flow
and recognizes an impairment loss when the estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to result from the use of the asset
plus the net proceeds expected from disposition of the asset, if any, are less than the carrying value of the asset. When the
Company identifies an impairment, it reduces the carrying amount of the asset to its estimated fair value based on a discounted
cash flow approach or, when available and appropriate, to comparable market values. During the six months and year ended December
31, 2017 the Company recorded an impairment charge on the goodwill related to the acquisition of Rocky Mountain High Water Company
in the amount of $59,163. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the goodwill related to this acquisition is fully impaired. No impairment
charges were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Share-based
Payments
Share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the financial statements
based on their fair values, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. That expense is recognized over the period during which an
employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting
period).
The
Company issued restricted stock to consultants and employees for various services. Cost for these transactions are measured at
the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.
The value of the common stock is to be measured at the earlier of (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the
counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete.
Convertible
Instruments
The
Company evaluates and accounts for conversion options embedded in convertible instruments in accordance with ASC 815 “Derivatives
and Hedging Activities.” Applicable GAAP requires companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments
and account for them as freestanding derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. The criteria include circumstances
in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related
to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative
instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under other GAAP with changes in fair value reported in earnings
as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative
instrument.
Preferred
Stock
We
apply the guidance enumerated in ASC 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” when determining the classification
and measurement of preferred stock. Preferred shares subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified as liability instruments
and are measured at fair value. We classify conditionally redeemable preferred shares (if any), which includes preferred shares
that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of
uncertain events not solely within our control, as temporary equity. At all other times, we classified our preferred shares in
stockholders’ equity. Our preferred shares do not feature any redemption rights within the holders’ control or conditional
redemption features not within our control. Accordingly, unless otherwise noted, all issuances of preferred stock are presented
as a component of consolidated stockholders’ equity (deficit).
Revenue
From Contracts with Customers
During the year ended December 31, 2017 the
Company recognized revenue in accordance with ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition.” Revenue was considered realized or realizable
and earned when all of the following criteria were met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) product delivery
has occurred, (3) the selling price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and (4) collectability of the revenue is reasonably
assured.
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU
2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” and all the related amendments, which are also codified into ASC 606.
The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
The following table represents sales by sales
channel for each of the periods:
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
December 31, 2017
(Unaudited)
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
(Unaudited)
|
Online
|
|
|
$
|
254,316
|
|
|
$
|
84,404
|
|
|
$
|
40,646
|
|
|
$
|
9,610
|
Distributor
|
|
|
|
78,853
|
|
|
|
32,551
|
|
|
|
5,753
|
|
|
|
310,728
|
Retailer
|
|
|
|
46,069
|
|
|
|
24,334
|
|
|
|
13,254
|
|
|
|
—
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
379,238
|
|
|
$
|
141,289
|
|
|
$
|
59,653
|
|
|
$
|
320,338
|
All sales for all periods presented
were to domestic customers.
Due to the nature of the Company’s revenue
from contracts with customers, the Company does not have material contract assets or liabilities that fall under the scope of ASC
606.
The Company’s revenues accounted for
under ASC 606, generally, do not require significant estimates or judgments based on the nature of the Company’s revenue
streams. The sales prices are generally fixed at the point of sale and all consideration from contracts is included in the transaction
price. The Company’s contracts do not include multiple performance obligations or material variable consideration.
Advertising
and Marketing
Advertising
and marketing expenses are charged to operations as incurred.
Income
Taxes
The
Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.”
Under this method, income tax expense is recognized for the amount of: (i) taxes payable or refundable for the current year and
(ii) deferred tax consequences of temporary differences resulting from matters that have been recognized in an entity’s
financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply
to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred
tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the
enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the deferred tax assets reported if based on the weight of the available
positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
ASC
Topic 740.10.30 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements
and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740.10.40 provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company has no material uncertain tax positions.
Segments
The Company has determined that
it operates one reportable operating segment. This determination was made based on the management approach, as described in FASB
ASC 280, “Reportable Segments.” The management approach is based on an entity’s internal organization and the
information that the chief operating decision maker uses to make decisions about operating matters. It also takes into consideration
the nature of products, production processes, types and classes of customers, distribution methods, the Company’s regulatory
environment, and whether discrete financial information is available for reportable segments.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Unless
otherwise noted, we have elected to use the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards
under Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act. This allows us to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have
different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As a result of our
election, our financial statements may not be comparable with other public companies.
In
February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
2016-02,
Leases (Topic 840)
, which requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet a right-of-use asset, representing
their right to use the underlying asset for the lease term, and a lease liability for all leases with terms greater than 12 months.
The guidance also requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures designed to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash
flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact that ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In
June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,
Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326)
, which requires the immediate recognition
of management’s estimates of current and expected credit losses. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company beginning January
1, 2021. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this guidance on our financial statements.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01,
Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805)
,
which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether
transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 is required to be applied
prospectively and will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. The impact on our consolidated financial statements
will depend on the facts and circumstances of any specific future transactions.
In
May 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-09,
Compensation-Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting
. This ASU amends
the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements, provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms
or conditions of share-based payment awards an entity is required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718. This update
is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2021. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2018-09 will have
on its consolidated financial statements.
In
June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07,
Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based
Payment Accounting
. The guidance is intended to reduce the complexity associated with issuers’ accounting for share-based
payment transactions for acquiring goods and services. The ASU is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2022. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2018-07 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In
July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11,
Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480):
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II)
Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain
Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception
. The guidance is intended to reduce the complexity
associated with issuers’ accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. Specifically,
a down round feature (as defined) would no longer cause a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or an embedded conversion
option) to be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in current earnings.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact
that ASU 2018-11 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In
August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13,
Fair Value Measurements: Disclosure Framework Changes to the Disclosure Requirements
for Fair Value Measurement
. This update modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820. The
ASU is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2021. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2018-13 will
have on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE
3 – Going Concern
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets
and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has a shareholders’ deficit of
$702,555, an accumulated deficit of $35,018,351 as of December 31, 2018, and has generated operating losses since
inception. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going
concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate revenues and its
ability to continue raising capital from third parties.
On
June 27, 2018, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) with GHS Investments, LLC (“GHS”),
which provides for GHS to purchase up to $15,000,000 of the Company’s common stock over a 24-month period based on a contractually
agreed upon market discount. In October 2018 the Company began sales of common stock to GHS under the SPA. Management believes
the SPA will provide sufficient cash flows until cash flows from operations become consistently positive.
NOTE
4 – Inventory
As of December
31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, inventory consists of the following:
|
|
December
31,
2018
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
Finished inventory
|
|
$
|
84,730
|
|
|
$
|
77,517
|
|
Raw materials and packaging
|
|
|
61,992
|
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
146,722
|
|
|
$
|
82,312
|
|
NOTE
5 – Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
As
of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, prepaid expenses and other current assets consists of the
following:
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Prepaid officers’ compensation
|
|
$
|
291,617
|
|
|
$
|
445,149
|
Prepaid directors’ compensation
|
|
|
29,442
|
|
|
|
147,207
|
Prepaid marketing expenses
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
13,750
|
Other prepaid expenses and current assets
|
|
|
64,265
|
|
|
|
28,616
|
Total
|
|
$
|
388,074
|
|
|
$
|
634,722
|
NOTE
6 – Property and Equipment
As of
December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, property and equipment consists of the following:
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Vehicles
|
|
$
|
29,598
|
|
|
$
|
29,598
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
41,422
|
|
|
|
42,538
|
Personal computers
|
|
|
17,901
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
88,921
|
|
|
|
74,515
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
54,641
|
|
|
|
38,834
|
Total
|
|
$
|
34,280
|
|
|
$
|
35,681
|
NOTE
7 – Acquisitions
Rocky
Mountain High Water Company LLC
In
July 2016, the Company entered into a business alliance with Poafpybitty Family, LLC to launch Eagle Spirit Spring Water, a line
of purified, high-alkaline spring water sourced from Native American tribal land in Oklahoma. The agreement calls for the Company
to pay a royalty on each gallon of water collected at the spring. Production of filtered spring water filled bottles commenced
in August 2016 and sales began in October 2016.
In
consideration for the 20-year water and surface rights, and a related 10-year renewal option, the Company paid Poafpybitty Family,
LLC cash payments of $22,500 and issued a warrant for 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $.03 per
share over a three-year period beginning July 27, 2016.
The
agreement grants the Company an exclusive right to develop land adjacent to the spring for commercial purposes as agreed to by
both parties. Additionally, the Company has agreed to grow hemp for experimental or commercial purposes on the land within three
years.
On
November 12, 2016, the agreement with the Poafpybitty Family was amended to give the Company a controlling voting interest of
75% of WaterCo, while the Poafpybitty Family received 51% of the equity interest. The amended agreement is being accounted for
as a step-acquisition, with the resulting goodwill of $59,163 included in other assets. During the six months ended December 31,
2017, the Company obtained an outside valuation of the rights to use the land and obtain the water described in the agreement.
As a result of that analysis and the continued operating losses by the Company’s spring water business, the Company determined
that its investment, including the related goodwill, was fully impaired. The Company recorded an impairment expense of $59,163
as of November 12, 2017. As a result of the step-acquisition, beginning on November 12, 2016 the operations of WaterCo are consolidated
in the financial statements of RMHB.
FitWhey
Brands Inc. (acquisition of the assets of BFIT Brands, LLC)
On July 25, 2018, the Company
purchased the assets of BFIT Brands, LLC, an Arizona-based company. The acquired assets include the cash, accounts receivable,
inventory, FitWhey trademark, recipes and formulas of BFIT’s FitWhey branded water-based protein drinks containing caffeine
and a vitamin-B pack. The Company paid $230,438 including common stock issued to the owners of BFIT of $75,000, forgiveness of
a note receivable of $80,000 plus accrued interest of $438, and $75,000 to be paid to the owners of BFIT over time based on 5%
of net sales of FitWhey products. No liabilities were assumed by the Company in the transaction.
The purchase price of the
assets of BFIT Brands, LLC assets was preliminarily allocated as follows:
Purchase Price
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
Note payable and accrued interest forgiven
|
|
|
80,438
|
Earnout liability
|
|
|
75,000
|
Total
|
|
$
|
230,438
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
15,612
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
5,763
|
Inventory
|
|
|
76,922
|
Software
|
|
|
31,000
|
Formulas
|
|
|
12,500
|
Trademark
|
|
|
2,500
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
86,141
|
Total
|
|
$
|
230,438
|
The Company is obtaining
an outside valuation of these assets.
The
following represents the unaudited pro forma statement of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2018 had FitWhey
been acquired on January 1, 2018:
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2018
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
448,685
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
465,400
|
Inventory Obsolescence
|
|
|
25,145
|
Gross Loss
|
|
|
(41,860)
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
4,577,323
|
Loss From Operations
|
|
|
(4,619,183)
|
Other Expenses
|
|
|
535,142
|
Loss Before Income Tax Provision
|
|
|
(5,154,325)
|
Income Tax Provision
|
|
|
—
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(5,154,325)
|
Net Loss Per Common Share-Basic and Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.00)
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
1,605,719,345
|
NOTE
8 – Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
As
of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of the
following:
|
|
December
31,
2018
|
|
December
31,
2017
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
308,717
|
|
|
$
|
373,882
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
25,500
|
|
|
|
215,026
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
170,997
|
|
|
|
161,899
|
Total
|
|
$
|
505,214
|
|
|
$
|
750,807
|
NOTE
9 – Related Party Convertible Notes Payable
As
of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company’s related party convertible notes payable
consists of the following:
|
|
Interest
Rate
|
|
Term
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
Related
party convertible
notes payable
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
179,000
|
Discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,544)
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
174,456
|
As
of December 31, 2017, the related party convertible notes include two notes payable to LSW Holdings, LLC (“LSW”)
in the amounts of $79,000 and $100,000. They are convertible to shares of the Company’s common stock at 50% of market price,
as defined in the notes payable agreements. These notes were reclassified to Convertible Notes Payable during 2018 upon the termination
of Lily Li, Executive Vice President, who is also the managing partner of LSW.
The
Company has determined that the conversion feature embedded in the notes referred to above that contain a potential variable conversion
amount constitutes a derivative which has been bifurcated from the note and recorded as a derivative liability, with a corresponding
discount recorded to the associated debt. The excess of the derivative value over the face amount of the note is recorded immediately
to interest expense at inception. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the six months ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, the Company recorded interest expense of $0, $0, $44,901 and $0, respectively, at the inception of the notes relating to
the excess of derivative value over the face of the notes.
For
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded interest
expense on these notes, including amortization of the discount, of $3,499, $345,239, $262,613 and $160,089, respectively.
NOTE
10 – Convertible Notes Payable
As
of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company’s convertible notes payable consists of the
following:
|
|
Interest Rates
|
|
Terms
|
|
Conversion Rates
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
GHS Investments, LLC (fixed conversion)
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
.3-.6 years
|
|
|
$
|
0.005
|
|
|
$
|
871,079
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
GHS Investments, LLC (variable conversion)
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
182,545
|
LSW Holdings, LLC (variable conversion)
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
179,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
Other convertible notes (fixed conversion)
|
|
|
6%-8%
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.02-0.024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other convertible notes (variable conversion)
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
844,450
|
Discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(383,483
|
)
|
|
|
(349,297)
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
666,596
|
|
|
$
|
677,698
|
(a) 50%
discount off the lowest trading price for the common stock during the 10 trading days prior to conversion
($0.003).
(b)
50% discount on the average of the 3 lowest closing bid prices during the 10 trading days prior to
conversion ($0.008).
(c)
45% discount off the lowest trading price for the common stock during the 20 trading days prior to
conversion ($0.003).
The
Company has determined that the conversion feature embedded in the notes referred to above that contain a potential variable conversion
amount constitutes a derivative which has been bifurcated from the note and recorded as a derivative liability, with a corresponding
discount recorded to the associated debt. The excess of the derivative value over the face amount of the note is recorded immediately
to interest expense at inception. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the six months ended December 31, 2018 and
2017,
$0, $1,446,168,
$1,179,140 and $0, respectively, was recorded at the
inception of the notes relating to the excess of derivative value over the face of the notes.
As
of June 30, 2017, our former Chairman of the Board held two notes payable with principal amounts of $200,150 and $184,300. The
$200,150 note, which was due on December 19, 2017, converts at 50% of the average of the 3 lowest bid prices of the common stock
during the 10 days prior to the conversion. The $184,300 note, which was renewed through December 30, 2017, is convertible at
$.01 with an anti-dilutive clause that becomes effective with any dilution of the Company’s common stock greater than 1%
of the shares outstanding at the time of split. Both notes accrue interest at 6%. During the six months ended December 31, 2017,
$384,450 of related party convertible notes payable were reclassified as convertible notes payable due to Mr. Grisaffi’s
resignation. Both of Mr. Grisaffi’s convertible notes payable were voided by a District Court in Dallas, County Texas in
2018 and were derecognized in the financial statements.
For
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, interest expense on these notes,
including amortization of the discount, was $1,255,081, $1,140,238,
$543,164, and $77,743, respectively.
All
tangible and intangible assets of the Company are pledged as security.
NOTE
11 – Notes Payable
As
of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company’s notes payable consists of the
following:
|
|
Interest
Rates
|
|
Term
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
Notes
payable
|
|
0%
- 6%
|
|
|
.7
–.8 years
|
|
|
$
|
37,493
|
|
|
$
|
549,936
|
As
of December 31, 2018, notes payable includes three notes: two non-interest bearing notes totaling $30,000 that originated prior
to the Company’s 2014 bankruptcy proceedings and a three-year note executed on September 1, 2016 relating to the purchase
of used office furniture and equipment from our landlord. The Company executed the note payable in the amount of $40,122 at an
interest rate of 0% and with monthly payments of $1,115. The Company imputed interest on the note and recorded a discounted note
balance of $36,634 on September 1, 2016. The term of the note is three years. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017 and June 30, 2017
the balance on this note was $7,493, $19,936 and $26,130, respectively.
On
November 30, 2017 the Company amended two notes payable to GHS in the aggregate principal amount of $500,000. The notes, which
were originally made on October 12 and November 2, 2017 and included conversion prices at 20% discount off market price, as defined
in the agreements. The amendments removed the conversion features in the notes. Upon amendment, the Company recorded a loss on
extinguishment of these notes of $15,256. As of December 31, 2017 the notes, which were previously included in convertible notes
payable are included in notes payable. The notes were amended to become convertible notes in 2018 and as of December 31, 2018
are included in convertible notes payable.
For
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and the six months ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded interest
expense on these notes of $931, $1,407, $493 and $710, respectively.
NOTE
12 – Deferred Revenue
In
December 2017, the Company executed a three-year Master Manufacturing Agreement with CBD Alimentos SA de CV (“CBD-Alimentos”),
a Mexican food and beverage distributor. Under the agreement (as amended), CBD Alimentos, through its sister company, CBD Life,
will be our exclusive distributor in Mexico for all of our CBD-infused energy and functional beverages. In turn, we will be CBD
Alimentos’ exclusive supplier of such products. The beverages supplied to CBD Alimentos will be private label products made
to order for CBD Alimentos, and we will cooperate on laboratory and taste-testing of each batch of beverages at the co-packing
facility. In accordance with the Agreement, RMHB opened a separate operating bank account for all deposits made by CBD Alimentos
towards the purchase of ingredients and packaging. CBD Alimentos is required to maintain a positive cash balance in the account
at all times. The Company will have full unilateral authority to disburse funds from the bank account to vendors, suppliers, co-packers
and the Company solely for the purposes of production and the Company’s margin on the sale. CBD Alimentos’ initial
purchase order, including a deposit of $466,300 was received in December 2018. The $466,300 is accounted for as Deferred Revenue
as of December 31, 2018 as production and delivery of finished product had not yet been completed.
NOTE
13 – Shareholders’ Deficit
Common Stock
As
of December 31, 2018, the Company has 4,000,000,000 shares of common stock authorized and 1,891,617,372 shares issued and outstanding.
On
March 14, 2017 the Board of Directors and the holders of a majority of the voting capital stock of the Company increased the Company’s
common stock authorization from 800,000,000 to 950,000,000 and on September 19, 2017 the authorization was increased to 4,000,000,000
shares.
During
the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company issued 733,729,095 shares of common stock, including 289,370,558 for convertible
notes payable conversions, 13,597,469 for director and employee compensation, 29,096,402 for option exercises, 8,150,531 for
vendor services rendered, 7,462,688 for the FitWhey acquisition, and 386,051,447 for cash. In September 2018, the Company
also cancelled 1,818,180 shares of common stock as part of a legal settlement.
During
the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company issued 424,626,143 shares of common stock, including 323,331,050 for convertible
notes payable conversions, 1,500,000 for warrant exercises, 30,112,800 for services rendered, 45,000,000 as part of a legal settlement,
and 24,682,293 for cash.
During
the six months ended December 31, 2017 the Company issued 373,181,339 shares of common stock, including 321,291,865 for convertible
notes payable conversions, 45,000,000 as part of a legal settlement, 789,474 for the conversion from Series E Preferred Shares,
5,600,000 for services rendered, and 500,000 for cash.
During
the six months ended December 31, 2016 the Company issued 197,090,550 shares of common stock for convertible notes payable conversions,
warrant exercises, compensation, cash purchases, services rendered, and a legal settlement.
On
March 17, 2017, our Board of Directors approved the Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. 2017 Incentive Plan (the “2017 Incentive
Plan”). The purpose of the Incentive Plan is to provide a means for the Company to continue to attract, motivate and retain
management, key employees, consultants and other independent contractors, and to provide these individuals with greater incentive
for their service to the Company by linking their interests in the Company’s success with those of the Company and its shareholders.
Initially, the Board authorized 35,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be included in the Plan. The Board of
Directors awards these shares at its sole discretion.
On
July 14, 2017 the Board of Directors increased the authorized shares in the 2017 Incentive Plan to 65,000,000.
On
December 19, 2017 the Board of Directors increased the authorized shares in the 2017 Incentive Plan to 100,000,000.
Preferred
Stock
As
of December 31, 2018 the Company has 20,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock authorized and 12,789,474 designated through the various
Series described below. The remaining 7,210,526 remain undesignated.
Series
A Preferred Stock
The
Company has 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock designated.
From
July 11, 2014 to February 28, 2017, our former Chairman of the Board held all of the1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series
A Preferred Stock. He transferred these shares to LSW Holdings, LLC (“LSW”) on February 28, 2017. As of December 31,
2017, LSW held all of these shares.
On
March 13, 2017, the Board of Directors approved a Certificate of Designation for our Series A Preferred Stock. This document revises
and restates the rights, preferences and features of our Series A Preferred Stock, which consists of 1,000,000 shares, all of
which are issued and outstanding. Holders of our Series A Preferred Stock were formerly entitled to cast 400 votes for every share
held, and shares of Series A Preferred Stock were convertible to common stock at a rate of 100 shares of common stock for every
share of Series A Preferred Stock. Following the filing of the Certificate of Designation, holders of Series A Preferred Stock
were entitled to cast 1,200 votes for every share held, and shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are convertible to
common stock at a rate of 1,200 shares of common stock for every share of Series A Preferred Stock.
On
July 5, 2017, the Company again amended the Certificate of Designation for our Series A Preferred Stock. The amendment changed
the conversion ratio of our Series A Preferred Stock from 1,200 shares of common stock for every share of Series A Preferred stock
to 100 shares of common stock for every share of Series A Preferred Stock. The amendment was approved by the Company’s Board
of Directors and LSW, the holder of our Series A Preferred Stock.
On
July 24, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Certificate of Designation for the Series A
Preferred Stock that changed the voting rights back to 400 votes from 1,200 for every share of Series A Preferred Stock.
On
August 30, 2018 in the case entitled
Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. f/k/a Republic of Texas Brands, Inc. Plaintiff, vs. Jerry
Grisaffi, et al,
a judgment by the District Court in Dallas County, Texas voided the Series A Preferred Stock
ab initio
.
The shares were cancelled on October 26, 2018 and as of December 31, 2018 are no longer issued and outstanding.
Series
B Preferred Stock
The
Company has 7,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock designated and none outstanding as of December 31, 2018, December 31,
2017 and June 30, 2017.
Series
C Preferred Stock
The
Company amended its Articles of Incorporation as of November 13, 2015 to designate 2,000,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock,
which are 12% interest bearing, cumulative, exchangeable, non-voting, convertible preferred stock of the Company. Each Series
C Preferred share is convertible 50 shares of common stock.
On
November 16, 2015, the holder of a convertible note aggregating $1,107,607 of principal and accrued interest, agreed to a dollar
for dollar exchange for same number of Series C Preferred Stock shares. As of June 30, 2017, there were 1,107,607 shares of Series
C Preferred shares outstanding and the related redemption value of these shares was classified as a current liability. On October
6, 2017, the Company and the holder reached a legal settlement whereby the Company agreed to an exchange of the Preferred C Stock
back to the originating note payable in accordance with the terms of the Exchange Agreement. The holder then assigned the note
to GHS in exchange for $1,000,000 consideration paid to him by GHS. As of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, there are no
Series C Preferred Stock shares outstanding. Interest expense recognized on these shares for the year ended December 31, 2017
and the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $121,598, $43,506, $158,836, respectively.
Series
D Preferred Stock
The
Company amended its Articles of Incorporation as of March 21, 2016 to designate 2,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock,
a non-voting, non-interest bearing convertible preferred stock. Each Series C preferred share is convertible to 100 shares of
common stock. As of December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017, there are no Series D preferred shares outstanding.
Series
E Preferred Stock
On
September 19, 2017, the Board of Directors designated a new Series E Preferred Stock. Holders of Series E Preferred Stock are
entitled to cast 2,000 votes per share of Series E Preferred Stock on any proposal to increase our authorized capital stock, with
no other voting rights. Series E Preferred Stock is convertible to common stock on a 1:1 basis. On the same day, the Board granted
Michael Welch, Chairman of the Board 789,474 shares of Series E Preferred stock as payment for his deferred compensation. On October
31, 2017, Mr. Welch converted his 789,474 shares of Series E Preferred Stock to 789,474 shares of common stock. As of December
31, 2018, December 31, 2017, there are no shares of Series E Preferred Stock outstanding.
Warrants
During
the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company granted no common stock warrants and none were exercised or forfeited. As of December
31, 2018, there were 12,650,000 warrants outstanding. Exercise prices range from $.001 to $.02 per share.
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company granted 12,150,000 common stock warrants and none were exercised. As part of a legal
settlement, 55,096,825 warrants were returned to the Company and cancelled on October 6, 2017. As of December 31, 2017 there were
650,000 warrants outstanding.
During
the six months ended December 31, 2017, the Company granted 12,000,000 common stock warrants and none were exercised. As part
of a legal settlement, 55,096,825 warrants were returned to the Company and cancelled on October 6, 2017.
During
the six months ended December 31, 2016, the Company granted 9,037,500 common stock warrants and 38,026,204 were exercised.
Options
During
the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company issued 13,566,768 options to purchase common stock. The options have an exercise
price of $.003 and vested immediately. During the year ended December 31, 2018, 35,100,000 options were exercised and none were
forfeited. As of December 31, 2018, there were 46,256,768 options outstanding. Exercise prices range from $.003 to $.045 per share.
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 67,790,000 options to purchase common stock. The options have an exercise
price ranging from $.003 to $.045 and vested immediately. During the year ended December 31, 2017, no options were exercised and
none were forfeited. As of December 31, 2017, there were 67,790,000 options outstanding. Exercise prices range from $.001 to $.045
per share.
During
the six months ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 39,440,000 options to purchase common stock. The options have an exercise
price ranging from $.001 and $.003 and vested immediately.
There
were no options granted or outstanding during the six months ended December 31, 2016.
NOTE 14 - Concentrations
For the year ended December 31, 2018,
the Company’s two largest customers represented 12% and 7% of sales. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company’s
two largest customers represented 21% and 12% of sales. For the six months ended December 31, 2017, the Company’s two largest
customers each represented 6% of sales. For the six months ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s two largest customers
represented 75% and 1% of sales.
NOTE
15 – Income Taxes
The
reconciliation of income tax benefit at the U.S. statutory rate of 21% to the Company’s effective rate for the year
ended December 31, 2018, the year ended December 31, 2017, and the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as
follows:
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Six Months Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Six Months Ended December 31, 2016
|
U.S federal statutory rate
|
|
|
(21
|
%)
|
|
|
(34
|
%)
|
|
|
(34%)
|
|
(34%)
|
State income tax, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(0.0
|
%)
|
|
|
(0.0
|
%)
|
|
|
(0.0%)
|
|
(0.0%)
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34%
|
|
34%
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
The
tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s net deferred tax liability as of December 31, 2018
and December 31, 2017 consist of the following:
Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
Net Operating Losses
|
|
$
|
3,990,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,440,000
|
Less: Valuation Allowance
|
|
$
|
(3,990,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,440,000)
|
Deferred Tax Assets – Net
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
As
of December 31, 2018, the Company has approximately $19,000,000 of federal and state net operating loss carryovers (“NOLs”),
which begin to expire in 2028. Utilization of the NOLs may be subject to limitation under the Internal Revenue Code Section 382
should there be a greater than 50% ownership change as determined under regulations.
In
assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation
of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled
reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based
on the assessment, management has established a full valuation allowance against the entire deferred tax asset relating to NOLs
for every period because it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The
Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were remeasured to reflect the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax
rate from 34% to 21%, resulting in a deferred tax expense of approximately $2,000,000 for the year and six months ended December
31, 2017 that is still fully valued against as of December 31, 2018. This expense is attributable to the Company being in a net
deferred tax asset position at the time of remeasurement. As the company maintains fully valuation allowance, this amount can
be seen on the rate reconciliation as an adjustment to deferred tax asset and corresponding valuation allowance.
On
December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law making significant changes
to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a federal corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% for
tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the transition of U.S international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial
system, and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings. We have estimated our provision
for income taxes in accordance with the Tax Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing but have kept the full valuation
allowance. As a result have recorded no income tax expense during the six months ended December 31, 2017, the period in which
the legislation was enacted.
On
December 22, 2017, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) was issued to address the application of US GAAP
in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared, or analyzed (including computations)
in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act. The deferred tax expense recorded
in connection with the remeasurement of deferred tax assets is a provisional amount and a reasonable estimate at December 31,
2018 based upon the best information currently available. The ultimate impact may differ from these provisional amounts, possibly
materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes in interpretations and assumptions the Company has made,
additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, and actions the Company may take as a result of the Tax Act. Any subsequent
adjustment to these amounts will be recorded to current tax expense in the quarter of 2018 when the analysis is complete. The
accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed in 2018.
In
assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation
of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled
reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based
on the assessment, management has established a full valuation allowance against the entire deferred tax asset relating to NOLs
for every period because it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
NOTE
16 – Commitments
Office
Leases
The
Company has a three-year lease for corporate office space. The lease commenced on September 1, 2016 with monthly payments of $7,715
in year one, $7,972 in year two, and $8,229 in year three. The lease is being accounted for on a straight-line basis over its
term.
On
January 18, 2018, WFLC entered into a 12-month office use agreement for office space in Denver, Colorado. Monthly payments are
$91. The lease was renewed for another 12 months in January 2019. Monthly payments remained $91.
Other
Leases
The
Company rents storage space from various third parties on a month-to-month basis.
Employee
Agreements
The
Company has entered into employment agreements with the following Board members and officers:
In
2014, the Company entered into a five-year employment agreement with David M. Seeberger, Vice President and General Counsel. Under
the agreement,
we
agreed to compensate Mr. Seeberger at a rate of $120,000 per year
and to bonus obligations based on the profitability of the Company. We also agreed to grant Mr. Seeberger an option to purchase
2,000,000 shares of common stock for par value at any time after January 1, 2015. On February 1, 2018, the Company entered into
a new three-year employment agreement with Mr. Seeberger. The new agreement includes base compensation of $120,000 per year and
discretionary bonuses as approved by the Board of Directors.
In
January 2016, the Company entered into a five-year employment agreement with Michael Welch, Chief Financial Officer. Under the
agreement,
we
agreed to compensate Mr. Welch at a rate of $120,000 per year and to
pay a bonus based on the profitability of the Company. Mr. Welch also became Chief Executive Officer on March 1, 2016. His salary
was increased to $150,000 per year. In addition, Mr. Welch received 10,000,000 warrants for common stock at a price of $.001 on
January 4, 2016 that were exercisable on July 25, 2016. On February 1, 2018, the Company entered into a new three-year employment
agreement with Mr. Welch. The new agreement includes base compensation of $150,000 per year and discretionary bonuses as approved
by the Board of Directors.
On
December 18, 2017, the Company entered into a five-year employment agreement with John Blackington, Chief Commercialization Officer.
The agreement includes base compensation of $140,000 per year, 7,000,000 common stock options, an annual bonus of up to 30%, and
discretionary bonuses as approved by the Board of Directors. The contract was terminated effective February 6, 2019.
On
February 1, 2018, the Company entered into a three-year employment agreement with Jens Mielke, Chief Financial Officer. The agreement
includes base compensation of $140,000 per year and discretionary bonuses as approved by the Board of Directors.
On
February 1, 2018, the Company entered into a three-year employment agreement with Charles Smith, Chief Operating Officer. The
agreement includes base compensation of $120,000 per year and discretionary bonuses as approved by the Board of Directors.
Other
Commitments
Under
the terms of the agreement with the Poafpybitty Family, the Company is required to pay them the lesser of 3% of the sales of Rocky
Mountain High Water Company or $30,000 per year.
NOTE
17 – Legal Proceedings
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc. v Lyonpride Music, LLC, United States District Court Northern District of Texas, 3:18-cv-00045-C, now
Lyonpride Music LLC v Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc., Before the American Arbitration Association, 01-18-0003-1428.
The
Company filed a suit against Lyonpride Music, LLC (“Lyonpride”) for fraud and for declaratory relief with respect
to a contract between the parties. Lyonpride is seeking monetary damages from the Company for breach of contract and the Company
is seeking monetary damages against Lyonpride. The case has been referred to binding arbitration as referenced above. The parties
are conducting discovery.
Dallas
County Texas, Case Number DC-17-15441 filed November 8, 2017. Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. f/k/a Republic of Texas Brands,
Inc. Plaintiff, vs. Jerry Grisaffi, Joe Radcliffe, LSW Holdings, LLC, Lily Li, Epic Group One, LLC, Kenneth Radcliffe, Dennis
Radcliffe, Phil Uhrik, Michael Radcliffe, Frank Izzo, Morgan Albright, John Garrison, BB Winks, LLC, Crackerjack Classic, LLC,
and Universal Consulting, LLC.
The
Company sought the return of our Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A”) issued to Jerry Grisaffi (“Grisaffi”),
RMHB’s former Chairman of the Board, and common stock issued to certain other defendants or later obtained by certain other
defendants for little or no consideration paid to the Company. The Company alleged, among other things, that Grisaffi breached
his fiduciary duty to the Company by issuing these Series A shares to himself and common stock to himself and others. RMHB also
sought to void the Indemnification and Release Agreement (“Indemnification”) between the Company and Grisaffi that
was executed in June 2017.
Grisaffi
filed a counterclaim against the Company seeking payment for two promissory notes allegedly owed to him, as well as relief under
the Indemnification. Those notes have been accounted for in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Those
counterclaim matters had been proactively addressed in the Company’s original suit, seeking to void the Indemnification
and the two notes based on, among other things, fraud of Grisaffi. Grisaffi had also filed a derivative suit within
the main lawsuit. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the derivative suit and on August 3, 2018 the Trial Court entered an Order
Dismissing Derivative Claims, dismissing the derivative suit with prejudice. That Order is final.
In
June 2018 LSW Holdings, LLC (“LSW”) and Lily Li (“Li”) filed counterclaims against the Company, generally
seeking an increase of voting rights of the Series A shares to 1200:1, a declaration that the Series A shares were validly issued
to Grisaffi, challenging the authorized share increase of the Company, claiming securities fraud by the Company with respect to
the Series A Shares purchased from Grisaffi and other common stock allegedly purchased by LSW and Li, as well as fraud, breach
of contract and negligent misrepresentation by the Company. LSW seeks $10,000,000 in damages from the Company, for the $3,500,000
which was paid to Grisaffi for the Series A shares and for which LSW claims to be the responsibility of the Company to cover,
and the remaining $6,500,000 for money allegedly spent by LSW in “developing a distribution system in China” and other
alleged “investments” of Li and LSW in the Company. LSW and Li also sought exemplary damages.
On
August 30, 2018, the Trial Court entered a final judgment and order in the Company’s favor and against Grisaffi. On August
29, 2018, after a show cause hearing, the Trial Court entered an order sanctioning Grisaffi for his repeated and unexcused refusals
to make discovery in the case. As a sanction, the Trial Court struck Grisaffi’s pleadings in the case and, on August 30,
2018, entered a Default Judgment against him. Under the Trial Court’s Default Judgment:
|
1.
|
The Court entered a monetary judgment against Grisaffi and in favor
of the Company in the amount of $3,500,000 for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and conversion with respect to the Series
A preferred stock.
|
|
2.
|
The Court declared that the Employment Agreement with Grisaffi dated April 1, 2013 was void
ab initio
and
unenforceable, and that all stock and promissory notes issued in connection with the Employment Agreement were also void
ab
initio
and of no force and effect, including but not limited to:
|
a.
The 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued to Grisaffi;
b.
The Convertible Promissory Note issued to Grisaffi in the principal amount of $184,300 dated April 1, 2016; and
c.
The Convertible Promissory Note issued to Grisaffi in the principal amount of $200,150 dated June 19, 2017.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
The Court declared that Grisaffi’s sale of the Series A Preferred Stock to LSW was made with actual intent to hinder,
delay, or defraud creditors and was thus a fraudulent transfer under Texas law.
|
|
4.
|
The Court declared that the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Li and the 11,000,000 shares of common stock
issued to Epic One Group, LLC were made without lawful consideration, and constituted breaches of fiduciary duty by Grisaffi.
|
|
5.
|
The Court declared that an Indemnification was procured through fraud and breach of fiduciary duty and is therefore void
and unenforceable.
|
|
6.
|
The Court ruled that Grisaffi shall take nothing by his counterclaims in the case.
|
Furthermore,
the Court ruled that our continuing claims against the other defendants in the case were to be severed and docketed under a separate
cause of action and case number. We have continued to pursue our claims against the other defendants in the below referenced case.
The
judgment and order entered August 30, 2018 concludes our litigation in district court as against Grisaffi. On September 4, 2018,
Mr. Grisaffi filed a Notice of Appeal in the case against him.
In
The Court Of Appeals For The Fifth District Of Texas Dallas, Texas, Jerry Grisaffi, Appellant v. Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc,
f/k/a Republic of Texas Brands, Inc., Appellee, No. 05-18-01020-CV.
Grisaffi
has filed an appeal of the Default Judgment, and submitted his brief on or about February 28, 2019. The Company is preparing its
brief which is currently due April 1, 2019. Grisaffi did not appeal the Order Dismissing Derivative Claims. Grisaffi only seeks
in his appeal to reverse in part the Default Judgment by striking the paragraph awarding monetary damages, leaving the remainder
of the Default Judgment intact.
Dallas
County Texas, Case Number DC-18-13491. Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. f/k/a Republic of Texas Brands, Inc. Plaintiff, vs. Joe
Radcliffe, LSW Holdings, LLC, Lily Li, Epic Group One, LLC, Kenneth Radcliffe, Dennis Radcliffe, Phil Uhrik, Michael Radcliffe,
Frank Izzo, Morgan Albright, John Garrison, BB Winks, LLC, Crackerjack Classic, LLC, and Universal Consulting, LLC.
This
is the surviving case of the above case, having been severed on September 12, 2018. In this case, on October 26, 2018 the Court
granted our Motion For Summary Judgment, per a Summary Judgment Order, against LSW, holding that all Series A Preferred Shares
in RMHB, including the shares issued to Grisaffi and later sold by him to LSW evidenced by Stock Certificate N0. 604 issued by
RMHB, to LSW Holdings LLC in the amount of 1,000,000 shares, were
void ab initio
, and any potential rights thereunder were
terminated as of July 11, 2014, when the bankruptcy court signed the Order Confirming Debtor’s Amended Plan of Reorganization.
The Series A Preferred Shares have no legal force or effect. The Court also granted a take nothing judgment against LSW on counterclaim
Counts 1, 2 and 3. The Company’s transfer agent has cancelled the Series A Preferred Shares. Later, on November 26, 2018,
the Court entered an Order of Sanctions against Li and LSW. In the Order of Sanctions, and in response to Li and LSW’s repeated
refusals to make proper discovery in the case, the Court struck the pleadings of these parties and ruled that RMHB was entitled
to take a default judgment against them.
On
February 4, 2019, the Court entered its Default Judgment against Li and LSW. In the Default Judgment, the Court ruled as follows:
|
1.
|
The
Employment Agreement with Grisaffi dated April 1, 2013 was void
ab initio
and unenforceable, and that all stock or
other instruments issued on the basis or authority of that Employment Agreement were also void
ab initio
and of no
force and effect;
|
|
2.
|
The
Series A Preferred Shares that RMHB issued to Grisaffi and later sold by Grisaffi to LSW were void
ab initio
and any
potential rights or remedies thereunder were terminated on July 11, 2014 pursuant to the Order Confirming Debtor’s Amended
Plan of Reorganization;
|
|
3.
|
Grisaffi’s
issuance and transfer to himself of the 1,000,000 Series A Preferred Shares, and his subsequent transfer of those shares to
LSW Holdings, were fraudulent transfers and are voided and set aside;
|
|
4.
|
Grisaffi
breached his fiduciary duties to RMHB by, among other things: (i), purporting to sell the Series A Preferred Shares to LSW,
(ii) causing the issuance of 11,000,000 shares of common stock to Epic Group One, LLC, and 10,000,000 shares of common stock
to Li for no consideration, and (iii) causing the issuance of 113,688,625 shares to the Radcliffe Group at deeply discounted
prices;
|
|
5.
|
LSW
and Li knowingly participated in Grisaffi’s breaches of fiduciary duty and are
therefore jointly and severally liable for all damages and equitable relief arising from
such breaches;
|
|
6.
|
The
issuance of 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Li was not authorized by the Board of Directors and was both void
ab initio
and a fraudulent conveyance;
|
|
7.
|
RMHB
is entitled to recover all damages proximately resulting from the improper issuance of the 10,000,000 shares of common stock
to Li;
|
|
8.
|
Li
did not perform and materially breached her agreement to raise money for RMHB;
|
|
9.
|
The
10,000,000 shares of purported common stock issued to Li belongs to RMHB and Li has no further rights or remedies arising
out of or related to the 10,000,000 shares;
|
|
10.
|
By
virtue of their actions described above, Li and LSW have taken advantage of RMHB and have unjustly enriched themselves at
Rocky Mountain High Brands’ expense, and RMHB is entitled to full restitution of all its losses and damages;
|
|
11.
|
LSW
Holdings and Li engaged in a civil conspiracy with Grisaffi to commit the wrongs against RMHB described above, and RMHB is
entitled to recover from them actual, consequential, and special damages resulting from such wrongs, including their knowing
participation in Grisaffi’s breaches of fiduciary duty, breaches of contract, receipt of fraudulent conveyances, and
unjust enrichments.
|
|
12.
|
The
torts against RMHB committed by LSW Holdings and Li were aggravated by fraud and malice, and RMHB is therefore entitled to
exemplary damages.
|
|
13.
|
LSW
Holdings and Li shall take nothing by their counterclaims; and
|
|
14.
|
RMHB
is entitled to court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees from LSW Holdings and Li.
|
The
amount of damages and attorneys’ fees to be awarded to RMHB and against LSW Holdings and Li will be determined in a trial
currently scheduled for June 3, 2019. We are continuing to pursue our claims against the remaining defendants in the case, which
will be adjudicated at trial, currently scheduled for June 3, 2019.
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc. v La Dolce Vita Trust and Christine Guthrie, In Her Capacity As Trustee, In The 382
nd
District
Court of Rockwall County, Texas, Cause No. 1-18-1608.
This
is a case whereby the Company is attempting to collect on the Default Judgment obtained against Grisaffi. More specifically the
Company is requesting the Court to order the La Dolce Vita Trust to turnover fraudulently transferred assets and for additional
relief necessary to enforce the Company’s judgment against Grisaffi.
Chet
– 5 Broadcasting, Inc. v Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc., Supreme Court of the State of New Your, County of Ulster, Case
No. 18-4416.
The
Plaintiff sued the Company, seeking $21,000.00 in damages for breach of contract. The Company is contesting that claim in its
entirety and has filed a counterclaim against the Plaintiff for an unspecified amount of damages. This case is new and the parties
have not yet conducted any discovery.
NOTE
18 – Other Income/Expenses
Gain/Loss
on Extinguishment of Debt
For
the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded a net loss on extinguishment of debt of $191,138 related to the settlement
of convertible notes payable. During the year ended and six months ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a net gain on
extinguishment of debt of $1,200,092 related to the settlement of convertible notes payable. There was no gain or loss on the
extinguishment of debt during the six months ended December 31, 2016.
Gain
on Change in Redemption Value of Series C Preferred Stock
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a gain of $834,242 on the change in redemption value of Series C Preferred
Stock related to the valuation of these shares. There was no change in redemption value for the year ended December 31, 2018 as
the Series C Preferred Stock was cancelled in October 2017 as part of a legal settlement with the holder. There was no change
in redemption value for six months ended December 31, 2016.
Gain
on Lawsuit Judgment and Legal Settlement
In
August 2018, the Company recorded a $654,289 gain related to the lawsuit judgment the Company received against Jerry Grisaffi,
our former Chairman of the Board. The Company de-recognized two notes payable to Mr. Grisaffi, plus accrued interest, in the amount
of $418,865, and de-recognized the related derivative liability of $235,424.
In
September 2018, the Company executed a settlement with Statewide Beverage and recorded a gain on legal settlement of $34,435.
As part of the settlement, the Company received 1,818,180 of its common shares that had previously been issued to the owners of
Statewide Beverage and cancelled them. The Company also recorded the extinguishment of liabilities that had been recorded at the
time of the sale of product to Statewide Beverage in 2016.
In
November 2018, the Company recorded a gain related to the lawsuit judgment the Company received against LSW in the amount of $1,000
related to a court order to void the Series A Preferred Stock initially issued to the Company’s former Chairman of the Board
and later purchased by LSW. The $1,000 gain represents the par value of the 1,000,000 shares cancelled.
NOTE
19 – Subsequent Events
Between
January 1 and April 12, 2019 the Company issued 191,774,799 shares of common stock, including 35,000,000 for convertible notes
payable conversions, 508,062 for employee compensation, and 156,266,737 for cash.
Holders
of convertible notes payable converted $155,981 of outstanding principal between January 1, 2019 and April 12, 2019.
On
January 31, 2019 43,715,482 options were forfeited by former members of the Board of Directors. On February 28, 2019, 851,286
options were forfeited by former consultants.
On
March 19, 2019, the Board of Directors authorized a reverse split of the Company’s common stock on a one-for-twenty basis.
Upon effectiveness, the Company’s authorized common stock will decrease from 4,000,000,000 to 200,000,000.
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
March
31, 2019
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
277,455
|
|
|
$
|
613,686
|
Accounts Receivable,
net of allowance of $2,544 and $5,275, respectively
|
|
|
9,909
|
|
|
|
17,324
|
Inventory
|
|
|
439,066
|
|
|
|
146,722
|
Prepaid
Expenses and Other Current Assets
|
|
|
449,017
|
|
|
|
388,074
|
TOTAL
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
1,175,447
|
|
|
|
1,165,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment,
net
|
|
|
30,119
|
|
|
|
34,280
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
141,899
|
|
|
|
148,647
|
Other
Assets
|
|
|
16,767
|
|
|
|
26,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
$
|
1,364,232
|
|
|
$
|
1,374,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
and Accrued Liabilities
|
|
$
|
631,595
|
|
|
$
|
505,214
|
Convertible Notes
Payable, net of debt discount
|
|
|
760,346
|
|
|
|
666,596
|
Notes Payable
|
|
|
34,346
|
|
|
|
37,493
|
Accrued Interest
|
|
|
43,164
|
|
|
|
25,758
|
Deferred Revenue
|
|
|
466,300
|
|
|
|
466,300
|
Derivative
Liability
|
|
|
201,907
|
|
|
|
376,172
|
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
2,137,658
|
|
|
|
2,077,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock - Series A - Par Value of
$.001; 1,000,000 shares designated; No shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Preferred Stock - Series B - Par Value
of $.001; 7,000,000 shares designated; No shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Preferred Stock - Series C - Par Value of
$.001; 2,000,000 shares designated; No shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Preferred Stock - Series D - Par Value of
$.001; 2,000,000 shares designated; No shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Preferred Stock - Series E - Par Value of
$.001; 789,474 shares designated; No shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and December 31,
2018
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
Common Stock - Par Value of $.001; 200,000,000
shares authorized; 104,169,609 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2019; 94,580,869 shares issued and outstanding
as of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
104,170
|
|
|
|
94,581
|
Additional Paid-In
Capital
|
|
|
35,404,015
|
|
|
|
34,221,215
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
(36,281,611
|
)
|
|
|
(35,018,351)
|
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
(773,426
|
)
|
|
|
(702,555)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
$
|
1,364,232
|
|
|
$
|
1,374,978
|
The
Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Consolidated Financial Statements
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
March
31, 2019
|
|
March
31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
76,429
|
|
|
$
|
50,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of Sales
|
|
|
75,730
|
|
|
|
66,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit (Loss)
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
(16,081)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and Administrative
|
|
|
956,640
|
|
|
|
1,080,518
|
Advertising
and Marketing
|
|
|
209,390
|
|
|
|
69,822
|
Total
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
1,166,030
|
|
|
|
1,150,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Operations
|
|
|
(1,165,331
|
)
|
|
|
(1,166,421)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
(Income)/Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
293,386
|
|
|
|
2,817,128
|
(Gain) Loss on Extinguishment
of Debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
196,500
|
(Gain)
Loss on Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability
|
|
|
(195,457
|
)
|
|
|
(1,847,985)
|
Total
Other (Income) Expenses
|
|
|
97,929
|
|
|
|
1,165,643)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Before Income
Tax Provision
|
|
|
(1,263,260
|
)
|
|
|
(2,332,064)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Tax Provision
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
$
|
(1,263,260
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,332,064)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
per Common Share - Basic and Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
99,757,126
|
|
|
|
68,366,399
|
The
Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Consolidated Financial Statements
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
March
31, 2019
|
|
March
31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
$
|
(1,263,260
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,332,064)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
71,826
|
|
|
|
224,090
|
Stock-based
payments to vendors
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
61,500
|
Non-cash
interest expense
|
|
|
303,691
|
|
|
|
2,762,497
|
Fees
and penalties on debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
120,251
|
Gain
on change in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
(195,457
|
)
|
|
|
(1,847,985)
|
Loss
on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
196,500
|
Bad
debt expense
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense
|
|
|
10,909
|
|
|
|
4,681
|
Changes in operating
assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
7,366
|
|
|
|
(7,448)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(292,344
|
)
|
|
|
11,152
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(128,767
|
)
|
|
|
27,296
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
9,478
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
126,379
|
|
|
|
(228,252)
|
NET
CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(1,350,130
|
)
|
|
|
(997,793)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
in other assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(31,220)
|
Acquisition
of property and equipment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,050)
|
NET
CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(32,270)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of convertible notes
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
Repayment
of convertible notes
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(172,932)
|
Repayment
of notes payable
|
|
|
(3,147
|
)
|
|
|
(3,042)
|
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
1,017,046
|
|
|
|
1,470,000
|
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
1,013,899
|
|
|
|
1,594,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE
(DECREASE) IN CASH
|
|
|
(336,231
|
)
|
|
|
563,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
- BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
613,686
|
|
|
|
16,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
- END OF PERIOD
|
|
$
|
277,455
|
|
|
$
|
580,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
$
|
10,305
|
|
|
$
|
54,631
|
Cash
paid for taxes
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock issued for conversion of debt
|
|
$
|
171,342
|
|
|
$
|
3,371,994
|
Debt
and accrued interest converted for common stock
|
|
$
|
156,876
|
|
|
$
|
444,918
|
Derivative
liability relieved upon conversion of related debt
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,941,860
|
Beneficial
conversion feature recognized as debt discount
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,328,740
|
The
Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Consolidated Financial Statements
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders' Deficit for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Preferred
Stock A
|
|
Preferred
Stock C
|
|
Preferred
Stock E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
APIC
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
Equity/
(Deficit)
|
Balance
- December 31, 2018
|
|
|
94,580,869
|
|
|
$
|
94,581
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
34,221,215
|
|
|
$
|
(35,018,351
|
)
|
|
$
|
(702,555)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for
cash
|
|
|
7,813,337
|
|
|
|
7,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,009,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,017,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for
compensation
|
|
|
25,403
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued upon
conversion of convertible notes
|
|
|
1,750,000
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2019
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,263,260
|
)
|
|
|
(1,263,260)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
- March 31, 2019
|
|
|
104,169,609
|
|
|
$
|
104,170
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
35,404,015
|
|
|
$
|
(36,281,611
|
)
|
|
$
|
(773,426)
|
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders' Deficit for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Preferred
Stock A
|
|
Preferred
Stock C
|
|
Preferred
Stock E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
APIC
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
Equity/
(Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31,
2017
|
|
|
1,159,706,457
|
|
|
$
|
1,159,706
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23,459,809
|
|
|
$
|
(31,662,414
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,041,899)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for
cash
|
|
|
135,149,014
|
|
|
|
135,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,334,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,470,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for
compensation
|
|
|
39,693,807
|
|
|
|
39,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued upon
conversion of convertible notes
|
|
|
168,805,244
|
|
|
|
168,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,203,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,371,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares to vendors
for services rendered
|
|
|
5,925,423
|
|
|
|
5,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial conversion
feature recognized on convertible notes payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,328,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,328,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for
the three months ended March 31, 2018
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,332,064
|
)
|
|
|
(2,332,064)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
- March 31, 2018
|
|
|
1,509,279,945
|
|
|
$
|
1,509,280
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
31,498,734
|
|
|
$
|
(33,994,478
|
)
|
|
$
|
(985,464)
|
The
Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Consolidated Financial Statements
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1 – General
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc. (“RMHB” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada.
On July 17, 2014, the Company changed its name from Republic of Texas Brands Incorporated to Totally Hemp Crazy, Inc and on October
23, 2015, the Company changed its name to Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc.
RMHB
currently operates through its parent company, three wholly-owned subsidiaries and one minority-owned subsidiary, which the Company
controls. All subsidiaries are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
RMHB
is a consumer goods company that specializes in developing, manufacturing, marketing, and distributing high-quality, health conscious,
cannabidiol (“CBD”) and hemp- infused products that span various categories including beverage, food, fitness, skin
care and more. RMHB also markets a naturally high alkaline spring water and a water-based whey protein and energy drink as part
of our brand portfolio.
In
March 2018, the Company launched the HEMPd brand with tinctures, gummies, water soluble drops, capsules, lotions, salves, and
E-juice liquids. In October 2018, the Company introduced CBD-infused waters in four flavors and plans to introduce additional
HEMPd product offerings in the future. HEMPd products are marketed through the Company’s Rocky Mountain Hemp Company subsidiary.
In November 2018, the Company discontinued sales of its vape-related products.
On
July 25, 2018 the Company acquired the assets of BFIT Brands, LLC (“BFIT”), an Arizona limited liability company.
These assets include the cash, accounts receivable, inventory, FitWhey trademark, recipes and formulas of BFIT’s FitWhey
branded water-based protein drinks containing caffeine and a vitamin-B pack.
The
Company continues to market its naturally flavored hemp-infused functional beverage, Mango Energy. RMHB also bottles and distributes
its naturally high alkaline spring water under the name Eagle Spirit Spring Water.
NOTE
2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America for interim financial statements and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of Regulation S-X of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not contain
all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual
financial statements. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
contain all the adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) to present the financial position of the
Company as of March 31, 2019 and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations
for the three months ended March 31, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or
any future period. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and related notes thereto included in the Company’s form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 filed with the SEC on
April 15, 2019.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries.
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of the financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain of the Company’s estimates could be affected by external
conditions, including those unique to its industry, and general economic conditions. It is possible that these external factors
could have an effect on the Company’s estimates that could cause actual results to differ from its estimates. The Company
re-evaluates all of its accounting estimates at least quarterly based on these conditions and record adjustments when necessary.
Cash
The
Company considers all short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity at the date of purchase of three months or
less to be cash equivalents.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company follows the guidance of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts
with Customers,” as amended. It records revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, product delivery has
occurred, the selling price to the customer is fixed or determinable and collectability of the revenue is reasonably assured.
The Company has not experienced any significant returns from customers and accordingly, in management’s opinion, no reserve
for returns has been provided. Payments received prior to shipment of goods are recorded as deferred revenue.
The
following table represents sales by sales channel for each of the periods:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
March
31, 2019
|
|
March
31, 2018
|
Online
|
|
$
|
60,960
|
|
|
$
|
26,982
|
Distributor
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
|
|
18,836
|
Retailer
|
|
|
14,048
|
|
|
|
5,091
|
Total
|
|
$
|
76,429
|
|
|
$
|
50,909
|
All
sales for all periods presented were to domestic customers.
Due
to the nature of the Company’s revenue from contracts with customers, the Company does not have material contract assets
or liabilities that fall under the scope of ASC 606.
The
Company’s revenues accounted for under ASC 606, generally, do not require significant estimates or judgments based on the
nature of the Company’s revenue streams. The sales prices are generally fixed at the point of sale and all consideration
from contracts is included in the transaction price. The Company’s contracts do not include multiple performance obligations
or material variable consideration.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable
The
Company has a policy of reserving for uncollectible accounts based on the best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses
in our existing accounts receivable. We extend credit to customers based on an evaluation of their financial condition and other
factors. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable and perform ongoing
credit evaluations of customers and maintain an allowance for potential bad debts if required.
It
is determined whether an allowance for doubtful accounts is required by evaluating specific accounts where information indicates
the customers may have an inability to meet financial obligations. In these cases,
we
use assumptions and judgment, based on the best available facts and circumstances, to record a specific allowance for those customers
against amounts due to reduce the receivable to the amount expected to be collected. These specific allowances are re-evaluated
and adjusted as additional information is received. The amounts calculated are analyzed to determine the total amount of the allowance.
The Company may also record a general allowance as necessary.
Direct
write-offs are taken in the period when we have exhausted our efforts to collect overdue and unpaid receivables or otherwise evaluate
other circumstances that indicate the collectability of receivables.
Inventories
Inventories,
which consist only of the Company’s finished products held for resale, are stated at the lower of cost, determined using
the first-in, first-out, and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price, in the ordinary course
of business, less estimated costs to dispose of the product.
If
the Company identifies excess, obsolete or unsalable items, its inventories are written down to their realizable value in the
period in which the impairment is first identified. Shipping and handling costs incurred for inventory purchases and product shipments
are recorded in cost of sales in the Company’s statements of operations.
Fair
Value Measurements
The
Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which defines fair value
as used in numerous accounting pronouncements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair
value measurements.
The
estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable
and accrued expenses are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature
of these instruments. The carrying amounts of our short- and long-term credit obligations approximate fair value because the effective
yields on these obligations, which include contractual interest rates taken together with other features such as concurrent issuances
of warrants and/or embedded conversion options, are comparable to rates of returns for instruments of similar credit risk.
ASC
820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price)
in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may
be used to measure fair value:
|
•
|
Level
1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
•
|
Level
2 — quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs
that are observable.
|
|
•
|
Level
3 — inputs that are unobservable (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on
assumptions).
|
The
derivative liability, which relates to the conversion feature of convertible debt and common stock warrants and options, is classified
as a Level 3 liability, and is the only financial liability measure at fair value on a recurring basis.
The
change in the Level 3 financial instrument is as follows:
Balance, December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
376,172
|
Issued during the three months ended March 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
21,192
|
Exercises/Conversions
|
|
$
|
—
|
Change in fair value recognized in operations
|
|
$
|
(195,457)
|
Balance, March 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
201,907
|
The
estimated fair value of the derivative instruments was valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following
assumptions as of March 31, 2019:
Estimated Dividends
|
|
|
None
|
Expected Volatility
|
|
|
66.7%
|
Risk Free Interest Rate
|
|
|
2.396%
|
Expected term
|
|
|
.1
to 3.75 years
|
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided for on a straight-line basis over the
useful lives of the assets. Expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized; repairs and maintenance are expensed
as incurred.
Leases
The Company accounts for leases
in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Topic 840
Leases
. In February 2016, the FASB
issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
, which requires lessees to recognize
on the balance sheet a right-of-use asset, representing their right to use the underlying asset for the lease term, and a lease
liability for all leases with terms greater than 12 months. The guidance also requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures
designed to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 was effective for calendar
year-end public companies on January 1, 2019. The Company’s status as an emerging growth company allows it to defer the
adoption of this standard by one year and the Company has elected to do so. The Company plans to adopt this new standard on January
1, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Capitalized
Software
Direct
costs related to software development, including coding, website application development, infrastructure development and graphics
development, are capitalized and included in other assets. Amortization is provided for on a straight-line basis over the useful
life of the software. Costs related to planning, content development, and operating and maintaining software are expensed as incurred.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The
Company evaluates intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of
an asset may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of the assets based on the undiscounted future cash flow
and recognizes an impairment loss when the estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to result from the use of the asset
plus the net proceeds expected from disposition of the asset, if any, are less than the carrying value of the asset. When the
Company identifies an impairment, it reduces the carrying amount of the asset to its estimated fair value based on a discounted
cash flow approach or, when available and appropriate, to comparable market values. No impairment charges were recorded during
the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.
Share-based
Payments
Share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the financial statements
based on their fair values, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. That expense is recognized over the period during which an
employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting
period). The Company had no common stock options or common stock equivalents granted or outstanding for all periods presented.
The
Company issued restricted stock to consultants and employees for various services. Cost for these transactions are measured at
the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.
The value of the common stock is to be measured at the earlier of (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the
counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete.
Convertible
Instruments
The
Company evaluates and accounts for conversion options embedded in convertible instruments in accordance with ASC 815 “Derivatives
and Hedging Activities.” Applicable GAAP requires companies to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments
and account for them as freestanding derivative financial instruments according to certain criteria. The criteria include circumstances
in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related
to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative
instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value under other GAAP with changes in fair value reported in earnings
as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative
instrument.
Preferred
Stock
We
apply the guidance enumerated in ASC 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” when determining the classification
and measurement of preferred stock. Preferred shares subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified as liability instruments
and are measured at fair value. We classify conditionally redeemable preferred shares (if any), which includes preferred shares
that feature redemption rights that are either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of
uncertain events not solely within our control, as temporary equity. At all other times, we classified our preferred shares in
stockholders’ equity. Our preferred shares do not feature any redemption rights within the holders’ control or conditional
redemption features not within our control. Accordingly, unless otherwise noted, all issuances of preferred stock are presented
as a component of consolidated shareholders’ deficit.
Advertising
Advertising
and marketing expenses are charged to operations as incurred.
Income
Taxes
The
Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.”
Under this method, income tax expense is recognized for the amount of: (i) taxes payable or refundable for the current year and
(ii) deferred tax consequences of temporary differences resulting from matters that have been recognized in an entity’s
financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply
to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred
tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the
enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the deferred tax assets reported if based on the weight of the available
positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
ASC
Topic 740.10.30 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements
and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740.10.40 provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company has no material uncertain tax positions.
NOTE
3 – Going Concern
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and
the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has a shareholders’ deficit of $773,426 and
an accumulated deficit of $36,281,611 as of March 31, 2019 and has generated operating losses since inception. These factors,
among others, raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation
as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate revenues and its ability to continue raising capital.
On
June 27, 2018, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) with GHS Investments, LLC (“GHS”),
which provides for GHS to purchase up to $15,000,000 of the Company’s common stock over a 24-month period based on a contractually
agreed upon market discount. The SPA replaces the Equity Financing Agreement the Company entered into with GHS on October 12,
2017. On August 8, 2018, the Company filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
to register up to 16,000,000 shares of our common stock to be purchased by GHS under the SPA. The registration statement became
effective on October 10, 2018 and the Company sold all the available shares under the SPA. On May 15, 2019, the Company filed
a registration statement for 30,000,000 shares to be purchased by GHS. Management believes the SPA, along with bridge financing
from GHS, will provide sufficient cash flows until cash flows from operations become consistently positive.
NOTE
4 – Inventory
Inventory
consists of the following:
|
|
March
31, 2019
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
Finished inventory
|
|
$
|
64,367
|
|
|
$
|
84,730
|
Raw materials and packaging
|
|
|
374,699
|
|
|
|
61,992
|
Total
|
|
$
|
439,066
|
|
|
$
|
146,722
|
NOTE
5 – Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets consist of the following:
|
|
March
31, 2019
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
Prepaid officers’ compensation
|
|
$
|
253,233
|
|
|
$
|
291,617
|
Prepaid directors’ compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29,442
|
Prepaid production
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
_____--
|
Other prepaid expenses and current assets
|
|
|
39,784
|
|
|
|
67,015
|
Total
|
|
$
|
449,017
|
|
|
$
|
388,074
|
NOTE
6 – Property and Equipment
Property
and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
March
31, 2019
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
Vehicles
|
|
$
|
29,598
|
|
|
$
|
29,598
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
45,322
|
|
|
|
41,422
|
Personal computers
|
|
|
17,901
|
|
|
|
17,901
|
|
|
|
92,821
|
|
|
|
88,921
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
62,702
|
|
|
|
54,641
|
Total
|
|
$
|
30,119
|
|
|
$
|
34,280
|
For
the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, depreciation expense was $4,161 and $4,681, respectively.
NOTE
7 – Acquisition
FitWhey
Brands Inc. (acquisition of the assets of BFIT Brands, LLC)
On
July 25, 2018, the Company purchased the assets of BFIT Brands, LLC, an Arizona-based company. The acquired assets include the
cash, accounts receivable, inventory, FitWhey trademark, recipes and formulas of BFIT’s FitWhey branded water-based protein
drinks containing caffeine and a vitamin-B pack. The Company paid $230,438 including common stock issued to the owners of BFIT
of $75,000, forgiveness of a note receivable of $80,000 plus accrued interest of $438, and $75,000 to be paid to the owners of
BFIT over time based on 5% of net sales of FitWhey products. No liabilities were assumed by the Company in the transaction.
The
purchase price of the assets of BFIT Brands, LLC assets was preliminarily allocated as follows:
Purchase Price
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
Note payable and accrued interest forgiven
|
|
|
80,438
|
|
Earnout liability
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
230,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
15,612
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
5,763
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
76,922
|
|
Software
|
|
|
31,000
|
|
Formulas
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
Trademark
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
86,141
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
230,438
|
|
The
Company is obtaining an outside valuation of these assets.
The
following represents the unaudited pro forma statement of operations of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2018
had FitWhey been acquired on January 1, 2018:
Sales
|
|
$
|
89,018
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
129,171
|
Gross Loss
|
|
|
(40,453)
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
1,158,299
|
Loss From Operations
|
|
|
(1,198,452)
|
Other Expenses
|
|
|
1,165,643
|
Loss Before Income Tax Provision
|
|
|
(2,364,095)
|
Income Tax Provision
|
|
|
—
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(2,364,095)
|
Net Loss Per Common Share-Basic and Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.03)
|
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
68,366,399
|
NOTE
8 – Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
440,502
|
|
|
$
|
308,717
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
25,500
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
164,093
|
|
|
|
170,997
|
Total
|
|
$
|
631,595
|
|
|
$
|
505,214
|
NOTE
9 – Convertible Notes Payable
Convertible
notes payable consist of the following:
|
|
Interest
Rates
|
|
Term
|
|
Conversion
Rates
|
|
March
31, 2019
|
|
December
31,
2018
|
GHS Investments, LLC (fixed
conversion)
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
.1
- .3
years
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
$
|
715,098
|
|
|
$
|
871,079
|
LSW Holdings, LLC (variable conversion)
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
179,000
|
|
|
|
179,000
|
Discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,752
|
)
|
|
|
(383,483)
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
760,346
|
|
|
$
|
666,596
|
|
(a)
|
50%
discount on the average of the 3 lowest closing bid prices during the 10 trading days
prior to conversion ($0.053).
|
For
the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, interest expense on these notes, including amortization of the discount, was $293,189
and $375,546, respectively.
All
tangible and intangible assets of the Company are pledged as security.
NOTE
10 – Notes Payable
Notes
payable consist of the following:
|
|
Interest
Rate
|
|
Term
|
|
March
31, 2019
|
|
December
31,
2018
|
Notes
payable
|
|
0
%
|
|
|
.6
years
|
|
|
$
|
34,346
|
|
|
$
|
37,493
|
As
of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, notes payable includes three notes: two non-interest bearing notes totaling $30,000 that
originated prior to the Company’s 2014 bankruptcy proceedings and a three-year note executed on September 1, 2016 relating
to the purchase of used office furniture and equipment from our landlord. The Company executed the note payable in the amount
of $40,122 at an interest rate of 0% and with monthly payments of $1,115. The Company imputed interest on the note and recorded
a discounted note balance of $36,634.
For
the three months ended March 2019 and 2018, interest expense on the furniture and equipment note was $197 and $631, respectively.
NOTE
11 – Deferred Revenue
In
December 2017, the Company executed a three-year Master Manufacturing Agreement with CBD Alimentos SA de CV (“CBD-Alimentos”),
a Mexican food and beverage distributor. Under the agreement (as amended), CBD Alimentos, through its sister company, CBD Life,
will be our exclusive distributor in Mexico for all of our CBD-infused energy and functional beverages. In turn,
we
will be CBD Alimentos’ exclusive supplier of such products. The beverages supplied to CBD Alimentos will be private
label products made to order for CBD Alimentos, and
we
will cooperate on laboratory
and taste-testing of each batch of beverages at the co-packing facility. In accordance with the Agreement, RMHB opened a separate
operating bank account for all deposits made by CBD Alimentos towards the purchase of ingredients and packaging. CBD Alimentos
is required to maintain a positive cash balance in the account at all times. The Company has full unilateral authority to disburse
funds from the bank account to vendors, suppliers, co-packers and the Company solely for the purposes of production and the Company’s
margin on the sale. CBD Alimentos’ initial purchase order, including a deposit of $466,300 was received in December 2018.
The $466,300 is accounted for as Deferred Revenue as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 as production and delivery of finished
product had not yet been completed.
NOTE
12 – Shareholders’ Deficit
Common
Stock
As
of March 31, 2019, the Company has 200,000,000 shares of common stock authorized and 104,169,609 shares issued and outstanding.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2019 the Company issued 9,588,740 shares of common stock, including 1,750,000 shares for convertible
notes payable conversions, 7,813,337 shares for cash, and 25,403 shares for compensation.
Preferred
Stock
The
Company has 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized as of March 31, 2019, of which 12,789,474 are specifically designated
to a series of preferred stock and 7,210,526 remain undesignated.
Series
A Preferred Stock
The
Company has 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock designated, of which none were outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and December
31, 2018. LSW Holdings LLC was the holder of these shares. Lily Li, who was the Company’s Executive Vice President until
April 5, 2018, is the Managing Member of LSW and, in that capacity, had the authority to direct voting and investment decisions
with regard to its holdings in the Company. On October 26, 2018 these shares were ruled void
ab initio
by a District Court
in Dallas County, Texas. The Company cancelled these shares effective that date.
Series
B Preferred Stock
The
Company has 7,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock designated, of which none were outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and December
31, 2018.
Series
C Preferred Stock
The
Company has 2,000,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock designated, of which none were outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and December
31, 2018. Series C Preferred Stock is 12% interest bearing, cumulative, exchangeable, non-voting, convertible preferred stock
of the Company. Each Series C Preferred share is convertible to 2.5 shares of common stock.
Series
D Preferred Stock
The
Company has 2,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock designated, of which none were outstanding as of March 31, 2019 and December
31, 2018. Series D Preferred Stock is a non-voting, non-interest bearing convertible preferred stock. Each Series D preferred
share is convertible to 5 shares of common stock.
Series
E Preferred Stock
On
September 19, 2017, the Board of Directors approved a new Series E Preferred Stock. Holders of Series E Preferred Stock are entitled
to cast 100 votes per share of Series E Preferred Stock on any proposal to increase our authorized capital stock, with no other
voting rights. Series E Preferred Stock is convertible to common stock on a 20:1 basis. On the same day, the Board granted our
Chairman 789,474 shares of Series E Preferred stock as payment for his deferred compensation. On October 31, 2017, Mr. Welch converted
his 789,474 shares of Series E Preferred Stock to 39,474 shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 there
were no shares outstanding.
Warrants
During
the three months ended March 31, 2019 the Company granted no common stock warrants, none were exercised, and none were cancelled.
Options
During
the three months ended March 31, 2019 the Company granted to a new employee 500,000 options to purchase common stock with a term
of three years and an exercise price of $.06. None of the options were vested as of March 31, 2019. No options were exercised
and none were cancelled during the three months ended March 31, 2019.
NOTE
13– Concentrations
During
the three months ended March 31, 2019 the Company’s two largest customers accounted for approximately 17% and 2% of sales,
respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company’s two largest customers accounted for approximately
28% and 12% of sales, respectively.
NOTE
14 – Income Taxes
The
reconciliation of income tax benefit at the U.S. statutory rate of 21% to the Company’s effective rate for the periods presented
is
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2019
|
|
|
March 31, 2018
|
U.S. federal statutory rate
|
|
|
(21
|
%)
|
|
|
(21%)
|
State income tax, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(0.0
|
%)
|
|
|
(0.0%)
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
21%
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0%
|
The
tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s net deferred tax liability as of March 31, 2019 and
December 31, 2018 are:
|
|
March
31 2019
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
Deferred
Tax Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Operating Losses
|
|
$
|
4,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,990,000
|
Less:
Valuation Allowance
|
|
$
|
(4,200,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,990,000)
|
Deferred
Tax Assets – Net
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
As
of March 31, 2018 the Company had approximately $20,000,000 of federal and state net operating loss carryovers (“NOLs”),
which begin to expire in 2028. Utilization of the NOLs may be subject to limitation under the Internal Revenue Code Section 382
should there be a greater than 50% ownership change as determined under regulations.
In
assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation
of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled
reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based
on the assessment, management has established a full valuation allowance against the entire deferred tax asset relating to NOLs
for every period because it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
On
December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law making significant changes
to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a federal corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% for
tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, the transition of U.S international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial
system, and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of foreign earnings. We have estimated our provision
for income taxes in accordance with the Tax Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing but have kept the full valuation
allowance. As a result the Company has recorded no income tax expense during the three months ended March 31, 2019.
The
Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were remeasured to reflect the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax
rate from 34% to 21%, resulting in a deferred tax expense of approximately $2,000,000 in 2017 that is still fully valued against
as of March 31, 2019. This expense is attributable to the Company being in a net deferred tax asset position at the time of remeasurement.
As the company maintains fully valuation allowance, this amount can be seen on the rate reconciliation as an adjustment to deferred
tax asset and corresponding valuation allowance.
NOTE
15 – Commitments
Office
Leases
The
Company has a three-year lease for corporate office space. The lease commenced on September 1, 2016 with monthly payments of $7,715
in year one, $7,972 in year two and $8,229 in year three. The lease is being accounted for on a straight-line basis over its term.
On
January 18, 2018, the RMHC entered into a 12-month office use agreement for office space in Denver, Colorado. Monthly payments
are $91. The lease was renewed for another 12 months in January 2019. Monthly payments remained $91.
Other
Leases
The
Company rents storage space from various third parties on a month-to-month basis.
NOTE
16 – Legal Proceedings
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc. v Lyonpride Music, LLC, United States District Court Northern District of Texas, 3:18-cv-00045-C, now
Lyonpride Music LLC v Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc., Before the American Arbitration Association, 01-18-0003-1428.
The
Company filed a suit against Lyonpride Music, LLC (“Lyonpride”) for fraud and for declaratory relief with respect
to a contract between the parties. Lyonpride is seeking monetary damages from the Company for breach of contract and the Company
is seeking monetary damages against Lyonpride. The case has been referred to binding arbitration as referenced above. The parties
are conducting discovery.
Dallas
County Texas, Case Number DC-17-15441 filed November 8, 2017. Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. f/k/a Republic of Texas Brands,
Inc. Plaintiff, vs. Jerry Grisaffi, Joe Radcliffe, LSW Holdings, LLC, Lily Li, Epic Group One, LLC, Kenneth Radcliffe, Dennis
Radcliffe, Phil Uhrik, Michael Radcliffe, Frank Izzo, Morgan Albright, John Garrison, BB Winks, LLC, Crackerjack Classic, LLC,
and Universal Consulting, LLC.
The
Company sought the return of our Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A”) issued to Jerry Grisaffi (“Grisaffi”),
RMHB’s former Chairman of the Board, and common stock issued to certain other defendants or later obtained by certain other
defendants for little or no consideration paid to the Company. The Company alleged, among other things, that Grisaffi breached
his fiduciary duty to the Company by issuing these Series A shares to himself and common stock to himself and others. RMHB also
sought to void the Indemnification and Release Agreement (“Indemnification”) between the Company and Grisaffi that
was executed in June 2017.
Grisaffi
filed a counterclaim against the Company seeking payment for two promissory notes allegedly owed to him, as well as relief under
the Indemnification. Those notes have been accounted for in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Those counterclaim
matters had been proactively addressed in the Company’s original suit, seeking to void the Indemnification and the two notes
based on, among other things, fraud of Grisaffi. Grisaffi had also filed a derivative suit within the main lawsuit. The Company
filed a motion to dismiss the derivative suit and on August 3, 2018 the Trial Court entered an Order Dismissing Derivative Claims,
dismissing the derivative suit with prejudice. That Order is final.
In
June 2018 LSW Holdings, LLC (“LSW”) and Lily Li (“Li”) filed counterclaims against the Company, generally
seeking an increase of voting rights of the Series A shares to 60:1, a declaration that the Series A shares were validly issued
to Grisaffi, challenging the authorized share increase of the Company, claiming securities fraud by the Company with respect to
the Series A Shares purchased from Grisaffi and other common stock allegedly purchased by LSW and Li, as well as fraud, breach
of contract and negligent misrepresentation by the Company. LSW seeks $10,000,000 in damages from the Company, for the $3,500,000
which was paid to Grisaffi for the Series A shares and for which LSW claims to be the responsibility of the Company to cover,
and the remaining $6,500,000 for money allegedly spent by LSW in “developing a distribution system in China” and other
alleged “investments” of Li and LSW in the Company. LSW and Li also sought exemplary damages.
On
August 30, 2018, the Trial Court entered a final judgment and order in the Company’s favor and against Grisaffi. On August
29, 2018, after a show cause hearing, the Trial Court entered an order sanctioning Grisaffi for his repeated and unexcused refusals
to make discovery in the case. As a sanction, the Trial Court struck Grisaffi’s pleadings in the case and, on August 30,
2018, entered a Default Judgment against him. Under the Trial Court’s Default Judgment:
|
1.
|
The
Court entered a monetary judgment against Grisaffi and in favor of the Company in the
amount of $3,500,000 for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and conversion with respect
to the Series A preferred stock.
|
|
2.
|
The
Court declared that the Employment Agreement with Grisaffi dated April 1, 2013 was void
ab initio
and unenforceable, and that all stock and promissory notes issued in
connection with the Employment Agreement were also void
ab initio
and of no force
and effect, including but not limited to:
|
|
a.
|
The
1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued to Grisaffi;
|
|
b.
|
The
Convertible Promissory Note issued to Grisaffi in the principal amount of $184,300 dated
April 1, 2016; and
|
|
c.
|
The
Convertible Promissory Note issued to Grisaffi in the principal amount of $200,150 dated
June 19, 2017.
|
|
3.
|
The
Court declared that Grisaffi’s sale of the Series A Preferred Stock to LSW was
made with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors and was thus a fraudulent
transfer under Texas law.
|
|
4.
|
The
Court declared that the issuance of 500,000 shares of common stock to Li and the 550,000
shares of common stock issued to Epic One Group, LLC were made without lawful consideration,
and constituted breaches of fiduciary duty by Grisaffi.
|
|
5.
|
The
Court declared that an Indemnification was procured through fraud and breach of fiduciary
duty and is therefore void and unenforceable.
|
|
6.
|
The
Court ruled that Grisaffi shall take nothing by his counterclaims in the case.
|
Furthermore,
the Court ruled that our continuing claims against the other defendants in the case were to be severeissued to Epic One Group,
LLC were made without lawful consideration, and constituted breaches of fiduciary duty by Grisaffi.d and docketed under a separate
cause of action and case number. We have continued to pursue our claims against the other defendants in the below referenced case.
The
judgment and order entered August 30, 2018 concludes our litigation in district court as against Grisaffi. On September 4, 2018,
Mr. Grisaffi filed a Notice of Appeal in the case against him.
In
The Court Of Appeals For The Fifth District Of Texas Dallas, Texas, Jerry Grisaffi, Appellant v. Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc,
f/k/a Republic of Texas Brands, Inc., Appellee, No. 05-18-01020-CV.
Grisaffi
has filed an appeal of the Default Judgment, and submitted his brief on or about February 28, 2019. The Company is preparing its
brief which is currently due April 1, 2019. Grisaffi did not appeal the Order Dismissing Derivative Claims. Grisaffi only seeks
in his appeal to reverse in part the Default Judgment by striking the paragraph awarding monetary damages, leaving the remainder
of the Default Judgment intact.
Dallas
County Texas, Case Number DC-18-13491. Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. f/k/a Republic of Texas Brands, Inc. Plaintiff, vs. Joe
Radcliffe, LSW Holdings, LLC, Lily Li, Epic Group One, LLC, Kenneth Radcliffe, Dennis Radcliffe, Phil Uhrik, Michael Radcliffe,
Frank Izzo, Morgan Albright, John Garrison, BB Winks, LLC, Crackerjack Classic, LLC, and Universal Consulting, LLC.
This
is the surviving case of the above case, having been severed on September 12, 2018. In this case, on October 26, 2018 the Court
granted our Motion For Summary Judgment, per a Summary Judgment Order, against LSW, holding that all Series A Preferred Shares
in RMHB, including the shares issued to Grisaffi and later sold by him to LSW evidenced by Stock Certificate N0. 604 issued by
RMHB, to LSW Holdings LLC in the amount of 1,000,000 shares, were
void ab initio
, and any potential rights thereunder were
terminated as of July 11, 2014, when the bankruptcy court signed the Order Confirming Debtor’s Amended Plan of Reorganization.
The Series A Preferred Shares have no legal force or effect. The Court also granted a take nothing judgment against LSW on counterclaim
Counts 1, 2 and 3. The Company’s transfer agent has cancelled the Series A Preferred Shares. Later, on November 26, 2018,
the Court entered an Order of Sanctions against Li and LSW. In the Order of Sanctions, and in response to Li and LSW’s repeated
refusals to make proper discovery in the case, the Court struck the pleadings of these parties and ruled that RMHB was entitled
to take a default judgment against them.
On
February 4, 2019, the Court entered its Default Judgment against Li and LSW. In the Default Judgment, the Court ruled as follows:
|
1.
|
The
Employment Agreement with Grisaffi dated April 1, 2013 was void
ab initio
and
unenforceable, and that all stock or other instruments issued on the basis or authority
of that Employment Agreement were also void
ab initio
and of no force and effect;
|
|
2.
|
The
Series A Preferred Shares that RMHB issued to Grisaffi and later sold by Grisaffi to
LSW were void
ab initio
and any potential rights or remedies thereunder were terminated
on July 11, 2014 pursuant to the Order Confirming Debtor’s Amended Plan of Reorganization;
|
|
3.
|
Grisaffi’s
issuance and transfer to himself of the 1,000,000 Series A Preferred Shares, and his
subsequent transfer of those shares to LSW Holdings, were fraudulent transfers and are
voided and set aside;
|
|
4.
|
Grisaffi
breached his fiduciary duties to RMHB by, among other things: (i), purporting to sell
the Series A Preferred Shares to LSW, (ii) causing the issuance of 550,000 shares of
common stock to Epic Group One, LLC, and 500,000 shares of common stock to Li for no
consideration, and (iii) causing the issuance of 5,684,432 shares to the Radcliffe Group
at deeply discounted prices;
|
|
5.
|
LSW
and Li knowingly participated in Grisaffi’s breaches of fiduciary duty and are
therefore jointly and severally liable for all damages and equitable relief arising from
such breaches;
|
|
6.
|
The
issuance of 500,000 shares of common stock to Li was not authorized by the Board of Directors
and was both void
ab initio
and a fraudulent conveyance;
|
|
7.
|
RMHB
is entitled to recover all damages proximately resulting from the improper issuance of
the 500,000 shares of common stock to Li;
|
|
8.
|
Li
did not perform and materially breached her agreement to raise money for RMHB;
|
|
9.
|
The
500,000 shares of purported common stock issued to Li belongs to RMHB and Li has no further
rights or remedies arising out of or related to the 500,000 shares;
|
|
10.
|
By
virtue of their actions described above, Li and LSW have taken advantage of RMHB and
have unjustly enriched themselves at Rocky Mountain High Brands’ expense, and RMHB
is entitled to full restitution of all its losses and damages;
|
|
11.
|
LSW
Holdings and Li engaged in a civil conspiracy with Grisaffi to commit the wrongs against
RMHB described above, and RMHB is entitled to recover from them actual, consequential,
and special damages resulting from such wrongs, including their knowing participation
in Grisaffi’s breaches of fiduciary duty, breaches of contract, receipt of fraudulent
conveyances, and unjust enrichments.
|
|
12.
|
The
torts against RMHB committed by LSW Holdings and Li were aggravated by fraud and malice,
and RMHB is therefore entitled to exemplary damages.
|
|
13.
|
LSW
Holdings and Li shall take nothing by their counterclaims; and
|
|
14.
|
RMHB
is entitled to court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees from LSW Holdings and
Li.
|
The
amount of damages and attorneys’ fees to be awarded to RMHB and against LSW Holdings and Li will be determined in a trial
currently scheduled for June 3, 2019. We are continuing to pursue our claims against the remaining defendants in the case, which
will be adjudicated at trial, currently scheduled for June 3, 2019.
Rocky
Mountain High Brands, Inc. v La Dolce Vita Trust and Christine Guthrie, In Her Capacity As Trustee, In The 382nd District Court
of Rockwall County, Texas, Cause No. 1-18-1608.
This
is a case whereby the Company is attempting to collect on the Default Judgment obtained against Grisaffi. More specifically the
Company is requesting the Court to order the La Dolce Vita Trust to turnover fraudulently transferred assets and for additional
relief necessary to enforce the Company’s judgment against Grisaffi.
Chet
– 5 Broadcasting, Inc. v Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc., Supreme Court of the State of New Your, County of Ulster, Case
No. 18-4416.
The
Plaintiff sued the Company, seeking $21,000 in damages for breach of contract. The Company is contesting that claim in its entirety
and has filed a counterclaim against the Plaintiff for an unspecified amount of damages. This case is new and the parties have
not yet conducted any discovery.
NOTE
17 – Subsequent Events
Between
April 1, 2019 and May 16, 2019 the Company issued 1,425,571 shares of common stock, all of which were for cash.
On
April 22, 2019 the reverse split of the Company’s stock, at a ratio of one share for every 20 shares, was effective. All
common stock share and per share amounts in this document reflect this reverse split.
On
May 3, 2019, the Company issued a new Convertible Promissory Note to GHS Investments, LLC (“GHS”) in the amount of
$105,000. The note bears interest at an annual rate of ten percent (10%), is secured by all of our assets, and is convertible
to shares of our common stock at a price of $0.05 per share. The note matures on February 3, 2020.
On
May 6, 2019, the Company amended seven Convertible Promissory Notes to GHS with an aggregate principal amount of $715,098. The
amendment extends the due dates of the notes originally ranging from April to July 2019 to dates ranging from December 2019 to
April 2020. The amendment also changed the fixed conversion price of each of the notes to $.05.
On
May 16, 2019, the Company issued a new Convertible Promissory Note to GHS in the amount of $157,500. The note bears interest at
an annual rate of ten percent (10%), is secured by all of our assets, and is convertible to shares of our common stock at
a price of $0.05 per share. The note matures on February 16, 2020.