UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-QSB
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
fiscal Quarter ended March 31, 2008
[
] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT
OF 1934
For the
transition period from to
Commission file
number:
000-31987
TEXHOMA ENERGY,
INC.
(Name of
small business issuer in its charter)
Nevada
|
20-4858058
|
(State
of organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
100
Highland Park Village
Dallas, Texas
75205
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(214)
295-3380
(Registrant's telephone number)
Check
whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for
such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X]
No [ ].
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ]
No [X].
At May 5,
2008, there were 245,112,224 shares of the issuer’s common stock
outstanding.
PART I – FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements.
TEXHOMA
ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
March 31,
2008 and September 30, 2007
ASSETS
|
|
March
2008
|
|
|
September
2007
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
36,670
|
|
|
$
|
44,785
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
219,088
|
|
Accounts
receivable-miscellaneous
|
|
|
20,801
|
|
|
|
185,350
|
|
Accounts
receivable-net oil and gas production
|
|
|
254,141
|
|
|
|
248,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Current Assets
|
|
|
311,703
|
|
|
|
698,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and Gas Properties and related assets, net of depletion and depreciation
of $2,632,590 and $2,333,426 at March 31, 2008 and September
30, 2007, respectively
|
|
|
4,455,004
|
|
|
|
4,556,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Assets
|
|
|
328,793
|
|
|
|
615,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
$
|
5,095,500
|
|
|
$
|
5,870,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
752,642
|
|
|
$
|
502,875
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
402,223
|
|
|
|
1,202,438
|
|
Notes
payable related parties
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
453,432
|
|
Convertible
notes payable
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
1,454,865
|
|
|
|
2,158,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long
term notes payable
|
|
|
7,934,881
|
|
|
|
8,155,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies (Note 9)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 1,000
shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2008 and September
30,
2007
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 245,112,224 and
231,162,224 shares issued and outstanding at March
31,
2008 and September 30, 2007,
respectively
|
|
|
245,112
|
|
|
|
231,162
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
10,298,074
|
|
|
|
10,330,166
|
|
Retained
deficit
|
|
|
(14,837,433
|
)
|
|
|
(15,005,216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders’ Deficit
|
|
|
(4,294,246
|
)
|
|
|
(4,443,887
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
$
|
5,095,500
|
|
|
$
|
5,870,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial
statements
TEXHOMA
ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the
three and six months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|
Six
months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenues
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Oil
and gas interests
|
|
$
|
429,125
|
|
$
|
437,537
|
|
$
|
846,715
|
|
$
|
915,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
|
429,125
|
|
|
437,537
|
|
|
846,715
|
|
|
915,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and gas exploration
|
|
|
106,940
|
|
|
243,983
|
|
|
344,507
|
|
|
350,720
|
|
Gross
Margin
|
|
|
322,185
|
|
|
193,554
|
|
|
502,208
|
|
|
564,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion
and depreciation
|
|
|
133,918
|
|
|
149,349
|
|
|
299,164
|
|
|
366,815
|
|
General
and administrative expenses
|
|
|
360,700
|
|
|
128,395
|
|
|
20,368
|
|
|
374,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
(172,433
|
)
|
|
(84,190
|
)
|
|
182,676
|
|
|
( 176,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
(loss) on sale of furniture and equipment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
accretion gain (expense)
|
|
|
(7,835
|
)
|
|
273,626
|
|
|
81,842
|
|
|
802,755
|
|
Loss
on investment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(54,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(250,000
|
)
|
Gain
on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
420,083
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
3,270
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
7,347
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(244,540
|
)
|
|
(290,636
|
)
|
|
(520,295
|
)
|
|
(587,904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other income (expense)
|
|
|
(202,375
|
)
|
|
(67,740
|
)
|
|
(14,893
|
)
|
|
(27,802
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(374,808
|
)
|
|
(151,930
|
)
|
|
167,783
|
|
|
(204,590
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(374,808
|
)
|
$
|
(151,930
|
)
|
$
|
167,783
|
|
$
|
(204,590
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
246,701,263
|
|
|
181,662,252
|
|
|
238,975,367
|
|
|
181,662,252
|
|
Diluted
weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
238,975,367
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Basic
diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
See
accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial
statements.
TEXHOMA
ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
For
the six months ended March 31, 2008 and for the year ended September 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Preferred
Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
Preferred
|
|
Contributed
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
Stock
|
|
Capital
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
[Deficit]
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2006
|
|
181,662,252
|
|
|
$
|
181,662
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10,527,155
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
$
|
(12,817,295
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,108,478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
issued June 7, 2007 at $0.0125 per share
|
|
18,000,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
Shares
issued June 7,2007 at $0.0125 per share
|
|
4,800,000
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
Shares
issued, June 10, 2007 for management agreement at $0.02 per
share
|
|
15,200,000
|
|
|
|
15,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,000
|
|
Shares
issued July 1, 2007 for services agreement at $0.02 per
share
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Shares
issued July 9, 2007 at $0.0125 per share
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
Shares
issued August 13, 2007 for management agreement at $0.02 per
share
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Shares
issued August 13, 2007 for management agreement at $0.001 per
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net
loss at September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,187,921
|
)
|
|
|
(2,187,921
|
)
|
Stock
accretion for warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(958,989
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(958,989
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2007
|
|
231,162,252
|
|
|
|
231,162
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10,330,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,005,216
|
)
|
|
|
(4,443,887
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
issued October 30, 2007 for settlement agreement at
$0.006
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Transfer
agent rounding adjustment
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
retired for settlement agreement at $0.01 per share
|
|
(5,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,000
|
)
|
Shares
issued January 18, 2006 for management agreement at $0.006 per
share
|
|
18,200,000
|
|
|
|
18,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,200
|
|
Shares
issued January 2, 2008 for services agreement at $0.006 per
share
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Net
income at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,783
|
|
|
|
167,783
|
|
Stock
accretion for warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
|
245,112,224
|
|
|
|
245,112
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10,298,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,837,433
|
)
|
|
|
(4,294,246
|
)
|
See
accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial
statements
TEXHOMA
ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
For
the three and six months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007
|
|
|
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six
months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(374,808
|
)
|
|
$
|
(151,930
|
)
|
|
$
|
167,783
|
|
|
$
|
(204,590
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to
net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion
|
|
|
133,286
|
|
|
|
146,585
|
|
|
|
297,900
|
|
|
|
364,050
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
80,350
|
|
|
|
82,482
|
|
|
|
160,700
|
|
|
|
162,200
|
|
Stock
issued for services
|
|
|
62,200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
63,700
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock
accretion (gain) loss
|
|
|
7,835
|
|
|
|
(273,626
|
)
|
|
|
(81,842
|
)
|
|
|
(802,755
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
26,275
|
|
|
|
114,885
|
|
|
|
159,290
|
|
|
|
262,417
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
187,721
|
|
|
|
63,495
|
|
|
|
249,767
|
|
|
|
(4,582
|
)
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
(50,645
|
)
|
|
|
69,480
|
|
|
|
(800,215
|
)
|
|
|
(
7,526
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
127,500
|
|
|
|
(12,000
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
95,214
|
|
|
|
51,371
|
|
|
|
344,583
|
|
|
|
(242,786
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and gas property investments and related
|
|
|
(126,969
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(197,864
|
)
|
|
|
(8,900
|
)
|
Decline
in value of investments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(126,969
|
)
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
(197,864
|
)
|
|
|
241,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
from affiliates
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
Loan
repayment to affiliates
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(403,432
|
)
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
Notes
payable proceeds
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Repayment
of notes payable
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
|
|
(68,423
|
)
|
|
|
(220,399
|
)
|
|
|
(188,680
|
)
|
Issuances
of stock for services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
|
|
(63,223
|
)
|
|
|
(373,831
|
)
|
|
|
(198,480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(32,149
|
)
|
|
|
42,148
|
|
|
|
(227,112
|
)
|
|
|
(200,166
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
68,910
|
|
|
|
247,563
|
|
|
|
263,873
|
|
|
|
489,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
36,761
|
|
|
$
|
289,711
|
|
|
$
|
36,761
|
|
|
$
|
289,711
|
|
See
accompanying summary of accounting policies and notes to financial
statements
TEXHOMA
ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the
six months ended March 31, 2008
1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
-
Texhoma Energy, Inc. is engaged in the exploration for and the production of
hydrocarbons, more commonly known as the exploration and production of crude oil
and natural gas. In March 2006, Texhoma incorporated a subsidiary in
Delaware, Texaurus Energy, Inc. for the same purposes.
Organization and Basis of
Presentation
– Texhoma’s securities are registered with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in the United States of America and its securities currently
trade under the symbol “TXHE.OB” on the U.S. Over the Counter Bulletin
Board.
The
financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
Use of Estimates
– Texhoma’s
financial statement preparation requires that management make estimates and
assumptions which affect the reporting of assets and liabilities and the related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in order to report these
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
The
primary estimates made by management included in these financial statements are
the impairment reserves applied to various long-lived assets and the fair value
of its stock tendered in various non-monetary transactions.
Cash and Cash Equivalents -
Cash includes all highly liquid investments that are readily convertible
to known amounts of cash and have original maturities of three months or
less.
Restricted Cash –
Texaurus
maintained residual cash from the proceeds of the Laurus Fund note in a
restricted account for as long as Texaurus shall have any obligations to
Laurus.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
-
SFAS No. 107,
Disclosures about Fair Values of
Financial Instruments
(FAS 107), requires disclosing fair values to the
extent practicable for financial instrument, which are recognized or
unrecognized in the balance sheet. For certain financial instruments, including
cash, accounts payable, and accrued expenses and short term debt, it was assumed
that the carrying value does not materially differ from fair
value. The fair value of debt was determined based upon current rates
at which Texhoma could borrow funds with similar maturities
remaining.
Property and Equipment-
Property and equipment are recorded at cost less impairment. Depreciation
is computed using the straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of two to
five years.
Texhoma’s
subsidiary depletes its oil and gas property based upon the estimated remaining
proved reserves as determined by a third party petroleum and geology consulting
firm. Based upon those estimations, the total proven reserves for the
leaseholds were as follows:
Field
|
|
Total
Proven Reserves
|
|
Remaining
at March 31, 2008
|
|
Depletion
rate for March 31, 2008
|
|
Depletion
rate for March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barnes
Creek
|
|
73,310
|
|
46,435
|
|
5.3%
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edgerly
|
|
210,574
|
|
50,060
|
|
1%
|
|
1.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Little
White Lakes
|
|
27,673
|
|
8,093
|
|
11.1%
|
|
11.4%
|
Long-Lived Assets
- The
Company's accounting policy regarding the assessment of the recoverability of
the carrying value of long-lived assets, including property, equipment and
purchased intangible assets with finite lives, is to review the carrying value
of the assets if the facts and circumstances suggest that they may be impaired.
If this review indicates that the carrying value will not be recoverable, as
determined based on the projected undiscounted future cash flows, the carrying
value is reduced to its estimated fair value.
Income Taxes
- Management
evaluates the probability of the realization of its deferred income tax
assets. The Company has estimated a $2,496,000 deferred income tax
asset at March 31, 2008 relating to net operating loss carryforwards and
deductible temporary differences. Of that amount, an estimated
$131,000 is related to the net operating gain generated for the six months ended
March 31, 2008. Management determined that because the Company has
not yet generated taxable income, because of the change in control that has
occurred in the past and the fact that certain losses have been generated
outside of the United States, it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will
not be realized from these operating loss carryforwards and deductible temporary
differences. Accordingly, the deferred income tax asset
is offset by a full valuation allowance.
If the
Company begins to generate taxable income, management may determine that some or
all of the deferred income tax asset may be recognized. Recognition
of the asset could increase after tax income in the future. The net
operating tax loss carry forward of approximately $5,239,000 expires from 2011
to 2025. The future utilization of the net operating losses is
uncertain.
Earnings or
(
Loss) Per Share
- Per SFAS
No. 128,
Earnings per Share
(FAS 128), earnings per share (or loss per share), is computed by
dividing the earnings (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of
common stock shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per
share reflects the potential dilution of securities by including other potential
common stock, including stock options and warrants, in the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the period.. Therefore
because including options and warrants issued would have an anti-dilutive effect
on the loss per share, only the weighted average (loss) per share is reported
for periods that report a loss.
Share-Based Payment
- In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,
Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation
(FAS 123(R)). Accordingly, Texhoma measures all stock-based
compensation awards using a fair value method and the correlating expense is
reflected in its financial statements as services are performed.
The
effects of FAS No. 123(R) on Texhoma’s results of operations and
financial position are dependent upon a number of factors, including the number
of employee stock options outstanding and unvested, the number of stock-based
awards which may be granted in the future, the life and vesting features of
stock-based awards which may be granted in the future, the future market value
and volatility of Texhoma’s stock, movements in the risk free rate of interest,
award exercise and forfeiture patterns, and the valuation model used to estimate
the fair value of each award.. In addition, Texhoma utilizes restricted stock
units as a key component of its ongoing employee stock-based compensation plan.
These awards generally are recognized at their fair value, equal to the quoted
market price of Texhoma’s common stock on the date of issuance, and this amount
is amortized over the vesting period of the shares of restricted stock held by
the grantee
2. PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
No
acquisitions of oil and gas properties were made during the six months ended
March 31, 2008.
3. SHARE
CAPITAL
Common Stock
- In May 2007,
4,800,000 shares of our common stock, at $0.0125, were subscribed for in
consideration for $60,000.
In May
2007, Valeska Energy Corp. entered into a management agreement with Texhoma for
a minimum period of three months. Mr. Dan Vesco is the Chief
Executive Officer of Valeska. In exchange for these services, Valeska
was issued 15,200,000 shares of Texhoma’s stock as payment and
retainer. On June 8, 2007, Capersia transferred 1,000,000 shares of
Texhoma stock to Mr. William Simmons and 1,000,000 shares to Valeska Energy
Corp.
In June
2007, 18,000,000 shares of our common stock were purchased at $0.0125 per share
by Hobart Global Ltd., a British Virgin Islands corporation in exchange for
$225,000.
In July
2007, additional shares of common stock were sold to Camecc A/S, a Norwegian
company for $12,500 or $0.0125 per share and another 500,000 shares were issued
to Mr. Ibrahim Nafi Onat in consideration for his entry into a Consulting
Agreement with us.
On or
about August 13, 2007, we entered into a Second Amendment to Management Services
Agreement with Valeska Energy Corp. (“Valeska” and the “Second
Amendment”).
Pursuant
to the Second Amendment, we and Valeska agreed to extend the term of the
Management Services Agreement until September 30, 2008, and to pay Valeska the
following consideration in connection with agreeing to perform the services
required by the original Management Services Agreement, and in consideration for
allowing Daniel Vesco and William M. Simmons (who has since resigned) to serve
as Directors of the Company, bringing on personnel to assist the Company with
the day to day operations of the Company, and helping bring the Company current
in its filings (the “Services”):
|
|
1,000
shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock (discussed
below);
|
|
|
A
monthly fee of $20,000 per month during the extended term of the Second
Amendment, plus reasonable and actual costs incurred by Valeska (or
individuals or designees brought on by Valeska, including lodging, car
rental and telephone expenses therewith) in connection with such
Services;
|
|
|
10,000,000
restricted shares of the Company’s common stock; and
|
|
|
60,000,000
options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, which shall have
a cashless exercise provision, shall be valid for a period of three years
from their grant date, and shall have an exercise price of $0.02 per share
which was greater than 110% of the trading price of the Company’s common
stock on the Pinksheets on the day of such
grant.
|
On or
about October 30, 2007, we entered into a Cooperation Agreement and Mutual
Release with our former consultant Terje Reiersen (“Reiersen” and the “Reiersen
Release”). Pursuant to the Reiersen Release, Reiersen agreed to
release us, our current and former officers, agents, directors, servants,
attorneys, representatives, successors, employees and assigns from any and all
rights, obligations, claims, demands and causes of action in contract or tort,
under any federal or state law, whether known or unknown, relating to his
services with the Company or the Company in general for any matter whatsoever
other than in connection with any claims against any former officers or
Directors of the Company, which claims Reiersen assigned to the
Company. In connection with the Reiersen Release, we paid Reiersen
$2,500 and issued Reiersen 250,000 restricted shares of our common
stock.
As
discussed below, in conjunction with the settlement agreement with Frank Jacobs,
5,000,000 shares of the Company stock owned by Mr. Jacobs were
retired.
4. STOCK
OPTIONS
Pursuant
to the Company's 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") options were issued at
an exercise price of $0.13 per share, which was equal to the average of the
highest ($0.125) and lowest ($0.111) quoted selling prices of the Company's
common stock on June 1, 2006, multiplied by 110%.
Options
that remain outstanding at March 31, 2008 include 2,000,000 options to purchase
shares to a consultant of the Company. The options granted were
not pursuant to the Plan. The options have an exercise price of $0.13
per share, vest at a rate of 250,000 options every three months and expire if
unexercised on June 1, 2009.
60,000,000
options were also granted to Valeska Energy Corp. on August 13, 2007 in
conjunction with the second amendment to the terms of their management agreement
at $0.02 per share and vested immediately. The options expire if
unexercised on August 13, 2010.
The
following is a summary of the option activity during the six months ended March
31, 2008:
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at October 1, 2007
|
|
62,000,000
|
|
$0.0235
|
Granted
and Expired
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Balance
at March 31, 2008
|
|
62,000,000
|
|
$0.0235
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
costs associated with the issuance of options to purchase shares of common stock
to employees, directors or consultants is measured at fair value at the date of
issuance based upon the options vested and expensed during the current
period.
As of
March 31, 2008, 61,500,000 of the options were vested. Based on our
knowledge as of the date of this filing, we have not applied a forfeiture rate
of the vested options. We reduced the accrual for option expense by
$7,850 in our current financial statements. The trading price of our stock was
$0.003 per share on March 31, 2008. The Black-Scholes option model
with the following assumptions: weighted average risk-free interest
rate of 4.25%, estimated volatility of 271%, weighted-average expected life of
2.35 years and no expected dividend yield, resulted in a fair value per option
of $0.006.
5.
RELATED PARTIES
On
December 7, 2004, the Company borrowed $50,000 from a related party, MFS
Technology. The loan is evidenced by a convertible promissory note, see
Note 6 for additional information.
In June
2007, Valeska Energy Corp. entered into a management agreement with Texhoma for
a minimum period of three months. Mr. Dan Vesco is the Chief
Executive Officer of Valeska. In exchange for these services, Valeska
was issued 15,200,000 shares of Texhoma’s stock as payment and
retainer. On June 8, 2007, Capersia transferred 1,000,000 shares of
Texhoma stock to Mr. William Simmons and 1,000,000 shares to Valeska Energy
Corp.
In July
2007 and January 2008, an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares were issued to Mr.
Ibrahim Nafi Onat in consideration for his entry into a consulting agreement
with us.
On or
about August 13, 2007, we entered into a Second Amendment to Management Services
Agreement with Valeska Energy Corp. (“Valeska” and the “Second
Amendment”).
Pursuant
to the Second Amendment, we and Valeska agreed to extend the term of the
Management Services Agreement, as well as engage Daniel Vesco and William M.
Simmons to serve as Directors of the Company until September 30, 2008, for the
following consideration
|
|
1,000
shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock;
|
|
|
A
monthly fee of $20,000 per month during the extended term of the Second
Amendment, plus reasonable and actual costs incurred by Valeska (or
individuals or designees brought on by Valeska, including lodging, car
rental and telephone expenses therewith) in connection with such
Services;
|
|
|
10,000,000
restricted shares of the Company’s common stock; and
|
|
|
60,000,000
options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, which shall have
a cashless exercise provision, shall be valid for a period of three years
from their grant date, and had an exercise price of $0.02 per share, equal
to greater than 110% of the trading price of the Company’s common stock on
the Pinksheets on the day of such
grant.
|
All of
the above transactions may have been entered into at terms which may not have
been available to unrelated parties.
6. NOTES
PAYABLE AND CONVERTIBLE LOANS
On
December 7, 2004, the Company borrowed $50,000 from a related
party. The loan is evidenced by a convertible promissory
note. The loan bears interest at 5% per annum calculated 6 months
after the advancement of funds. $25,000 was due on June 7, 2005 and
the remaining balance, plus interest was due on December 7, 2005. The
loan has not been repaid, extended or converted. The lender has the option
during the term of the loan, and any extension, to convert the principle and
interest into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per
share.
The
Laurus Master Fund, Ltd (“Laurus”) note accrues interest at the Prime Rate plus
two percent (2.0%) as published in The Wall Street Journal, but shall not at any
time be less than eight percent (8.0%). Payments of accrued interest
and principal equal eighty (80%) of the Net Revenue paid to Texaurus in respect
of oil, gas and/or other hydrocarbon production in which Texaurus has an
interest and each payment is applied first to accrued interest due and then to
the principal balance of the note
On or
about October 19, 2006, we issued a Promissory Note to Mr. Frank Jacobs, our
then Director, in the amount of $493,643.77, which amount represented funds
advanced to the Company by Mr. Jacobs during the 2006 calendar year and
management fees owed to Mr. Jacobs for his services to the Company during the
2006 calendar year (the “Jacobs' Note”). The Jacobs' Note bears interest at the
rate of 6% per annum until paid, and is payable by the Company at any time on
demand. The Jacobs' Note may be pre-paid at any time without penalty. Any
amounts not paid on the Jacobs' Note when due shall bear interest at the rate of
15% per annum. As discussed below, the Jacobs Note and all affiliated
notes have been forgiven.
On or
about June 5, 2007, we entered into an Agreement with Jacobs Oil & Gas
Limited (“Jacobs”), pursuant to which Jacobs agreed that no interest would be
due from us and/or accrue on the principal or accrued interest to date on his
outstanding Promissory Note for the period of one (1) year from the date of the
Agreement and that he would not attempt collection of the principal
and/or accrued interest on such note for a period of one (1) year.
The
Company also entered into a Security Agreement with Mr. Jacobs under which
Agreement the Board of Directors ratified the assignment of 200,000 shares of
the common stock of Morgan Creek Energy Corp., which shares were held by the
Company, to Mr. Jacobs as security for the money that was owed to Mr. Jacobs
under the Jacobs' Note.
On or
about November 2, 2007, we entered into a First Amendment to Securities Purchase
Agreement, Secured Term Note and Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus (the
“First Amendment”). Pursuant to the First Amendment, Laurus agreed
to:
|
(a)
|
waive
any default which may have occurred as a result of our failure to become
current in our filings with the Commission, contingent upon bringing our
filings current prior to December 15, 2007, which we
did;
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
amend
the terms of the Laurus Note to provide that a “Change of Control” of
Texaurus under the Note, which requires approval of Laurus, includes any
change in Directors such that Daniel Vesco and William M. Simmons are no
longer Directors of Texaurus; and
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
amend
the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus to provide that
the date we are required to gain effectiveness of a registration statement
registering the shares of common stock issuable in connection with the
exercise of the Laurus Warrant in the Company is amended to no later than
April 30, 2008, and that the effective date of any additional registration
statements required to be filed by us in connection with the Registration
Rights Agreement, shall be thirty (30) days from such filing
date. In the future, we currently anticipate offering Laurus
cashless exercise rights in connection with the Texhoma Warrant in lieu of
registering such shares on a Registration Statement; however, there can be
no assurance that Laurus will accept such cashless exercise rights in lieu
of registration.
|
On or
about November 28, 2007, we entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual
Release (the “Agreement”) by and between the Company, Frank A. Jacobs, our
former officer and Director (“Jacobs”), and Jacobs Oil & Gas Limited, a
British Columbia corporation (“JOGL” and collectively with Jacobs, the “Jacobs
Parties”), Clover Capital, a creditor of the Company (“Clover”), Capersia Pte.
Ltd., a Singapore company and a significant stockholder of the Company
(“Capersia”), Peter Wilson, an individual and a former Director of the Company
(“Wilson”), and Sterling Grant Capital, Inc., a British Columbia
corporation,
controlled by Mr. Wilson (“SGC” and collectively with Clover, Capersia and
Wilson, the “Non-Jacobs Parties,” and with the Jacobs Parties, the “Interested
Parties”). We had various disputes with the Interested Parties
relating to the issuances of and transfers of various shares of our common stock
and various of the Interested Parties had alleged that we owed them
consideration (the “Disputes”). We entered into the Agreement to
settle the Disputes with the Interested Parties.
In
consideration for the Company agreeing to enter into the Agreement, the Jacobs
Parties agreed to the following terms: the Jacobs Parties would return to the
Company for cancellation 5,000,000 of the 7,500,000 shares purchased by Jacobs
in March 2006 (the “Jacobs Shares”); all debt owed by Texhoma to the Jacobs
Parties, known or unknown, was discharged and forgiven, including the total
outstanding amount of the approximately $500,000 Promissory Note owed to Frank
A. Jacobs by the Company (the “Jacobs Note”); the Company owes Jacobs no rights
to contribution and/or indemnification in connection with Jacobs employment with
the Company; Jacobs agreed to certify the accuracy and correctness of the
Company’s previously prepared annual and interim financial statements and
periodic reports, relating to the time period of his employment from
approximately January 2005 to June 2007; the Jacobs Parties agreed they have no
interest in and will not interfere with the issuance of or any subsequent
transfers of shares to or from Lucayan Oil and Gas Investments, Ltd. (the “LOGI
Shares”), a Bahamas corporation; Jacobs agreed to use his best efforts to answer
the Company’s questions and produce documents in the future regarding operations
and financials of the Company; Jacobs agreed that he no longer holds any
exercisable options of the Company; the Voting Agreement entered into between
various parties in June 2007, including Jacobs, remains in full affect and force
against Jacobs; and Jacobs has no interest in any shares other than the
aforementioned 2,500,000 shares.
Additionally,
in consideration for the Company agreeing to enter into the Agreement, the
Non-Jacobs Parties agreed to the following terms: any and all debts owed by
Texhoma to Clover, which purportedly totaled approximately $60,000, Capersia,
which purportedly totaled $60,000 or any of the Non-Jacobs Parties (including
approximately $20,000 purportedly owed to Wilson) was discharged and forgiven;
the Non-Jacobs Parties agreed that they have no interest in and will not
interfere with the issuance of the LOGI Shares; the Voting Agreement remains in
full force and effect against Capersia; and in connection with the 30,000,000
shares of Company stock in Capersia’s possession received through Texhoma’s
previous purchase of a 40% interest in Black Swan Petroleum Pty. Ltd. (the
“Capersia Shares”), Capersia will not transfer shares in excess of 2% of
Texhoma’s then outstanding shares in any three (3) month period, until the
second anniversary of the Agreement.
As a
result of the Agreement, the Company was able to settle approximately $640,000
in debt which it purportedly owed to the various Interested Parties and to
settle any and all other claims which such parties, in return for the
consideration discussed above, which mainly consisted of assigning the rights to
the 200,000 shares of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. stock to Frank A. Jacobs, which
shares had an approximate value of $92,000 based on the trading price of Morgan
Creek Energy Corp.’s common stock on the date of the Agreement of
$0.46. The extinguishment of this debt resulted in a gain of
approximately $370,000 for us.
On or
about November 28, 2007, we entered into a Subscription Agreement with Pagest
Services SA, a Swiss Company, pursuant to which we agreed to sell two units
consisting of $125,000 in Convertible Promissory Notes with a conversion price
of $0.0125 per share, convertible at the option of Purchaser, into the Company’s
common stock, and Class A and Class B Warrants to purchase 5,000,000 shares of
common stock with an exercise price of $0.02 and $0.03 per share, respectively,
exercisable for a period of two years from the date of the Subscription
Agreement (the “Units”). One Unit was sold immediately to the
Purchaser, and one Unit was sold on December 19,
2007. The Convertible Promissory Notes bear interest at the rate of
2% per annum, until paid in full, which amount will increase to 15% per annum,
upon the occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined in the Convertible
Promissory Notes). The Convertible Promissory Notes are due on the
first anniversary of the date they are sold, with the first $125,000 in
Convertible Promissory Notes being due on November 28, 2008, unless converted
into shares of our common stock. In the event that our common stock
trades on the market or exchange on which it then trades, at a trading price of
more than $0.02 per share, for any 10 day trading period, the Convertible
Promissory Note will automatically convert into shares of our common stock at
the rate of one share for each $0.0125 owed to the subscriber. We
also agreed to provide the subscriber piggy-back registration rights in
connection with the sale of the Units.
7. NET
GAIN (LOSS) PER SHARE
Restricted
shares and warrants are included in the computation of the weighted average
number of shares outstanding during the periods presented that reflect a
gain. The net loss per common share is calculated by dividing the
consolidated loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during
the periods. The inclusion of options and warrants in the calculation
would be anti-dilutive, and they are excluded from the computation presented in
the financial statements for periods of loss.
8. WARRANTS
The
following is a summary of the warrant activity during the six months ended March
31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding,
October 1, 2007
|
|
11,687,500
|
|
$0.04
|
Granted
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
0.025
|
Outstanding
at March 31, 2008
|
|
21,687,500
|
|
$0.033
|
Costs
attributable to the issuance of share purchase warrants are measured at fair
value at the date of issuance and offset with a corresponding increase in
additional Paid-in-Capital at the time of issuance. When the warrant
is exercised, the receipt of consideration is an increase in shareholders’
equity.
We
granted 10,000,000 warrants during the six months ended March 31,
2008 at exercise prices of $0.02 and $0.03 per share.
The
trading price of our stock was $0.003 per share on March 31,
2003. Outstanding warrants were issued at $0.02 to
$0.04 resulting in a weighted average price of $0.033 per
share. The Black-Scholes option model with the following
assumptions: weighted average risk-free interest rate of 4.25%,
estimated volatility of 271%, weighted-average expected life of 2.39 years and
no expected dividend yield, resulted in a fair value per warrant of
$0.0055.
The fair
value of the warrants granted and vested during the six months ended March 31,
2008, based upon the Black-Scholes option pricing model was a
decrease of $81,842 from the expense at September 30, 2007and as such we
reflected the reduction to expense previously reported in our current financial
statements.
9.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As
discussed in prior years filings, management wound down operations in Thailand
and Australia after unsuccessful drilling in the Concession of Black Swan
Petroleum. A determination has not been made as to the financial or
legal consequence to Texhoma or its officers or its shareholders, for subsequent
obligations, if any, to persons or governmental entities which may arise from
doing business or owning or leasing property in Thailand and
Australia.
10.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In April
2008, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release with
William M. Simmons and Valeska (the “Simmons Release”). Pursuant to
the Simmons Release, Mr. Simmons agreed to resign as an officer and Director of
the Company, and of Texaurus, effective April 22, 2008, and of Valeska and
agreed to serve as a consultant to the Company on a limited basis for a period
of six months following such resignation. Additionally, Mr. Simmons
and the Company agreed to mutually release each other and our assigns from any
and all rights, obligations, claims, demands or causes of action, known or
unknown relating to any issue whatsoever in connection with the Simmons
Release. We also agreed to issue Mr. Simmons 6,500,000 shares of
common stock in connection with his entry into the Settlement
Agreement,
which shares have not been issued to date, and have not been included in the
number of issued and outstanding shares disclosed throughout this
report.
11.
GOING CONCERN ISSUES
We cannot
provide any assurances that the Company will be able to secure sufficient funds
to satisfy the cash requirements for the next 12 months. The inability to secure
additional funds would have a material adverse effect on the
Company.
These
financial statements are presented on the basis that the Company will continue
as a going concern. Other than the previously disclosed
impairments, no adjustments have been made to these financial statements to give
effect to valuation adjustments that may be necessary in the event the Company
is not able to continue as a going concern. The effect of those
adjustments, if any, could be substantial.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which
contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The
Company reported net income of $168,000 for the six months ended
March 31, 2008 but has incurred $14,837,000 in cumulative
losses. Further, the Company has inadequate working capital to
maintain or develop its operations, and is dependent upon funds from its
stockholders and third party financing.
These
factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as
a going concern. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of these
uncertainties. There is no assurance that the Company will receive
the necessary loans required to funds its exploration plans.
* * * * *
* * * *
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of
Operations.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
ALL
STATEMENTS IN THIS DISCUSSION THAT ARE NOT HISTORICAL ARE FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 21E OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, AS AMENDED. STATEMENTS PRECEDED BY, FOLLOWED BY OR THAT OTHERWISE INCLUDE
THE WORDS "BELIEVES", "EXPECTS", "ANTICIPATES", "INTENDS", "PROJECTS",
"ESTIMATES", "PLANS", "MAY INCREASE", "MAY FLUCTUATE" AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS OR
FUTURE OR CONDITIONAL VERBS SUCH AS "SHOULD", "WOULD", "MAY" AND "COULD" ARE
GENERALLY FORWARD-LOOKING IN NATURE AND NOT HISTORICAL FACTS. THESE
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS WERE BASED ON VARIOUS FACTORS AND WERE DERIVED
UTILIZING NUMEROUS IMPORTANT ASSUMPTIONS AND OTHER IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD
CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INCLUDE THE INFORMATION CONCERNING OUR
FUTURE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE, BUSINESS STRATEGY, PROJECTED PLANS AND OBJECTIVES.
THESE FACTORS INCLUDE, AMONG OTHERS, THE FACTORS SET FORTH BELOW UNDER THE
HEADING "RISK FACTORS." ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE THAT THE EXPECTATIONS REFLECTED IN
THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE REASONABLE, WE CANNOT GUARANTEE FUTURE
RESULTS, LEVELS OF ACTIVITY, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS. MOST OF THESE FACTORS
ARE DIFFICULT TO PREDICT ACCURATELY AND ARE GENERALLY BEYOND OUR CONTROL. WE ARE
UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO PUBLICLY UPDATE ANY OF THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS TO
REFLECT EVENTS OR CIRCUMSTANCES AFTER THE DATE HEREOF OR TO REFLECT THE
OCCURRENCE OF UNANTICIPATED EVENTS. READERS ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE
RELIANCE ON THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. REFERENCES IN
THIS FORM 10-QSB, UNLESS ANOTHER DATE IS STATED, ARE TO MARCH 31,
2008. AS USED HEREIN, THE “COMPANY,” “TEXHOMA,” “WE,” “US,” “OUR” AND
WORDS OF SIMILAR MEANING REFER TO TEXHOMA ENERGY, INC. AND ITS WHOLLY OWNED
DELAWARE SUBSIDIARY, TEXAURUS ENERGY, INC., UNLESS OTHERWISE
STATED.
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Business
History
Texhoma
Energy, Inc. (“we,” “us,” the “Company”, and “Texhoma”), was originally formed
as a Nevada corporation on September 28, 1998 as Pacific Sports Enterprises,
Inc. and on September 20, 2004, we changed our name to Texhoma Energy, Inc. in
connection with our change in business focus to oil and gas exploration and
production.
On
February 2, 2006, we executed a Sale and Purchase Agreement (the “Clovelly SPA”)
with Sterling Grant Capital, Inc. pursuant to which we acquired a 5% (five
percent) working interest in the Clovelly South prospect (bringing our total
working interest to 11%) located in Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. As a result,
the Company agreed to fund the work program for the Clovelly South project in
accordance with the Joint Operating Agreement for the property. The
Allain-Lebreton No. 2 well was drilled and plugged and abandoned in September
2006.
On March
15, 2006, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Texaurus Energy, Inc., which was formed
in March 2006 as a Delaware corporation ("Texaurus"), entered into a Sales and
Purchase Agreement with Structured Capital Corp., a Texas corporation to
purchase certain oil and gas leases in Vermillion Parish, Louisiana. The 8%
working interest (5.38167% net revenue interest) in the Intracoastal City field
was acquired for a) two million five hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000) and
b) the issuance of 37,500,000 shares of our common stock.
On March
28, 2006 Texaurus entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement ("Securities
Purchase Agreement") with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus"); a Registration
Rights Agreement with Laurus; issued Laurus a Common Stock Purchase Warrant;
entered into a Master Security Agreement with Laurus;
sold
Laurus a Secured Term Note in the amount of $8,500,000, and entered into various
other agreements. Additionally, in connection with the closing, we issued Laurus
a Common Stock Purchase Warrant to purchase up to 10,625,000 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $0.04 per share.
The
Secured Term Note (the "Note") in the amount of $8,500,000, which was sold by
Texaurus to Laurus in connection with the Closing, is due and payable in three
years from the Closing on March 27, 2009 (the "Maturity Date"), and bears
interest at the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate (the "Prime Rate"), plus two
percent (2%) (the "Contract Rate"), based on a 360 day year, payable monthly in
arrears, beginning on April 1, 2006, provided however that the Contract Rate
shall never be less than eight percent (8%).
The Note
provides for payments of principal and interest on the funds to be made monthly
and applied to interest first, beginning June 1, 2006, through the Maturity
Date. The amount of these monthly principal payments is equal to eighty percent
(80%) of the gross production revenue received by Texaurus, relating to all oil
and gas properties owned by Texaurus, for the prior calendar month, provided
that the payments shall increase to one hundred percent (100%) of such gross
production revenue if an Event of Default occurs (as defined in the
Note).
In
addition Laurus can acquire up to 961 shares of Texaurus’ common stock at an
exercise price of $0.001 per share, representing 49% of Texaurus’ outstanding
common stock. This will be valued at Fair Market Value as of the date
of the transaction.
In
connection with the Closing, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement
with Laurus, by which we agreed to file a registration statement covering the
shares exercisable in connection with the Texhoma Warrant within sixty (60) days
of the date of the Closing, and that such registration statement would be
effective within one hundred and eighty (180) days of the Closing date, which
registration statement we have not filed to date, due to the fact
that we were not current in our filings with the Commission until December 15,
2007. In November 2007, we entered into the First Amendment to
Securities Purchase Agreement, Secured Term Note and Registration Rights
Agreement with Laurus, to amend the Registration Rights Agreement, which
requires us to gain effectiveness of a registration statement covering the
shares exercisable in connection with the Texhoma Warrant to April 30,
2008. In the future, we currently anticipate offering Laurus cashless
exercise rights in connection with the Texhoma Warrant in lieu of registering
such shares on a Registration Statement; however, there can be no assurance that
Laurus will accept such cashless exercise rights in lieu of
registration.
The
Securities Purchase Agreement and Laurus March 2006 funding is described in
greater detail below under “March 2006 Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
Funding.”
On March
28, 2006, with an effective date of January 1, 2006, Texaurus closed a Sales
& Purchase Agreement to purchase certain interests in the Barnes Creek gas
field and the Edgerly field from Kilrush Petroleum, Inc. Texaurus paid the
$5,225,000 purchase price with proceeds received from its sale of the Secured
Term Note with Laurus.
Significant Transactions
Affected During 2007 and 2008:
Management Services
Agreement
On or
about May 15, 2007, we entered into a Management Services Agreement with Valeska
Energy Corp. (“Valeska”), whose Chief Executive Officer is Daniel Vesco, our
Chief Executive Officer, which was subsequently amended on or about June 1, 2007
(collectively the “Management Agreement”).
Pursuant
to the Management Agreement, we agreed to enter into a Joint Venture agreement
with Valeska (the “Joint Venture”), described below; Valeska agreed to provide
management services and act as our Management Consultant, for a monthly fee of
$10,000 (plus expenses), which has since been increased, or 15% of any revenue
we generate, whichever is greater (excluded however, are asset sales and/or
income of a capital nature); and we also issued Valeska 15,200,000 restricted
shares of our common stock. The Management Agreement was amended
to issue Valeska an additional 18,200,000 shares of our common stock
upon such time as we are able to bring our public reporting requirements current
with the Commission and seek reinstatement on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin
Board, which has occurred to date, and which shares have been issued to Valeska
to date. These shares will be valued at Fair Market Value using the most
appropriate valuation method. The Management Agreement was for a term
of three months, beginning May 1, 2007 and the amended agreement dated August,
2007 is described below.
Joint Venture
Agreement
On or
about May 15, 2007, we entered into a Joint Venture Relationship Agreement with
Valeska (the “Joint Venture Agreement”), pursuant to which we and Valeska agreed
to form a new Texas limited partnership (the “Joint Venture”), of which Valeska
will serve as general partner. The Joint Venture Agreement contemplates that
Valeska will cause funds to be invested, arrange financial and strategic
partnerships, and that both parties would bring investment opportunities to the
Joint Venture. Pursuant to the Joint Venture Agreement, Valeska has
co-investment rights in the Joint Venture. Any distributions from the Joint
Venture will be paid first to Valeska and the Company, in an amount equal to 8%
to Valeska and 2% to the Company, subject to investor approval; then to any
investors as negotiated therewith; and finally Valeska and the Company will
share any remaining distributions, with Valeska receiving 80% of such
distributions and the Company receiving 20% of such distributions.
The Joint
Venture Agreement also provides that Valeska has the right to require us to
purchase its interest in the Joint Venture at any time, in exchange for shares
of our common stock. In the event that Valeska exercises this right, the
valuation of the Joint Venture will be valued in a negotiated manner or at 30%
greater than the gross acquisition cost of any property acquired by the Joint
Venture, and the number of shares exchangeable for such interest will be equal
to the market price of our shares of common stock on the date that such right is
exercised by Valeska.
Additionally,
we have the right, pursuant to the Joint Venture Agreement, to veto any deal
which Valeska proposes to include in the Joint Venture.
Voting
Agreement
On or
about June 5, 2007, certain of our largest shareholders, including Capersia Pte.
Ltd.; Frank A. Jacobs, our former officer and Director; and Valeska Energy,
Inc., which is controlled by and is majority owned by Daniel Vesco,
the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company (“Valeska”
and collectively the “Shareholders”) entered into a Voting Agreement (the
“Voting Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Voting Agreement
the Shareholders agreed that for the Term of the Voting Agreement, as defined
below, no Shareholder would vote any of the shares of common stock (the
“Shares”) which they hold for (i.e. in favor of) the removal of William M.
Simmons (who has since resigned as a Director) or Daniel Vesco, our Directors
(the “New Directors”). The Shareholders also agreed that in the event
of any shareholder vote of the Company (either by Board Meeting, a Consent to
Action with Meeting, or otherwise) relating to the removal of the New Directors;
the re-election of the New Directors; and/or the increase in the number of
directors of the Company during the Term of the Voting Agreement, that such
Shareholders would vote their Shares against the removal of the New Directors;
for the re-election of such
New
Directors; and/or vote against the increase in the number of directors of the
Company, without the unanimous consent of the New Directors,
respectively.
The
Voting Agreement further provided that in the event that either of the New
Directors breaches his fiduciary duty to the Company, including, but not limited
to such Director’s conviction of an act or acts constituting a felony or other
crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, theft or fraud; such Director’s
gross negligence in connection with his service to the Company as a Director
and/or in any executive capacity which he may hold; and/or if any Shareholder
becomes aware of information which would lead a reasonable person to believe
that such Director has committed fraud or theft from the Company, or a violation
of the Securities laws, the Voting Agreement shall not apply, and the
Shareholders may vote their shares as they see fit.
The Term
of the Voting Agreement is until June 5, 2009 (the “Term”). The
Shareholders agreed to enter into the Voting Agreement in consideration for the
New Directors agreeing to serve the Company as Directors of the
Company.
On or
about July 12, 2007, another one of our significant shareholders, Lucayan Oil
and Gas Investments, Ltd. (“LOGI”), which is 50% owned by Max Maxwell, our
former President and Director, entered into a Voting Agreement with us, which
was amended by a First Amendment to Voting Agreement, which provided that the
shares of common stock held by LOGI would be subject to the identical terms of
our June 5, 2007 Voting Agreement with the Shareholders.
Consulting
Agreement
Effective
July 1, 2007, we entered into a Consulting Agreement with Ibrahim Nafi Onat, our
Director (the “Consulting Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Onat agreed to
serve as our Director and Vice President of Operations for an initial term of
twelve (12) months, which term is renewable month to month thereafter with the
mutual consent of the parties. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement
we agreed to pay Mr. Onat $2,500 per month during the term of the Consulting
Agreement, to issue him 500,000 restricted shares of common stock valued at the
market price on the date of issuance, in connection with his entry into the
Consulting Agreement and 500,000 restricted shares of common stock assuming he
is still employed under the Consulting Agreement at the expiration of six (6)
months from the effective date of the Consulting Agreement, which he was, and
which shares have been issued to date (the “Six Month
Issuance”).
On or
about August 13, 2007, we entered into a Second Amendment to Management Services
Agreement with Valeska Energy Corp. (“Valeska” and the “Second
Amendment”).
Pursuant
to the Second Amendment, we and Valeska agreed to extend the term of the
Management Services Agreement until September 30, 2008, and to pay Valeska the
following consideration in connection with agreeing to perform the services
required by the original Management Services Agreement, and in consideration for
allowing Daniel Vesco and William M. Simmons to serve as Directors of the
Company, bringing on personnel to assist the Company with the day to day
operations of the Company, and help bring the Company current in its filings
(the “Services”):
|
·
|
1,000
shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock;
|
|
·
|
A
monthly fee of $20,000 per month during the extended term of the Second
Amendment, plus reasonable and actual costs incurred by Valeska (or
individuals or designees brought on by Valeska, including lodging, car
rental and telephone expenses therewith) in connection with such
Services;
|
|
·
|
10,000,000
restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, which have been issued to
date; and
|
|
·
|
60,000,000
options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, which have a
cashless exercise provision, are valid for a period of three years from
their grant date, and have an exercise price of greater than 110% of the
trading price of the Company’s common stock on the Pinksheets on the day
of such grant, which exercise price is equal to $0.02 per
share.
|
The
Company and Valeska plan on entering into a new Management Services Agreement in
the future, subsequent to the filing of this report which may materially change
the terms of the Management Services
Agreement
currently in effect. The Company plans to promptly file a Form 8-K to
report the entry into the Management Services Agreement, assuming such agreement
is entered into in the future.
On or
about November 2, 2007, we entered into a First Amendment to Securities Purchase
Agreement, Secured Term Note and Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus (the
“First Amendment”). Pursuant to the First Amendment, Laurus agreed
to:
|
(a)
|
waive
any default which may have occurred as a result of our failure to become
current in our filings with the Commission, assuming that we become
current in our filings prior to December 15, 2007;
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
amend
the terms of the Laurus Note to provide that a “Change of Control” of
Texaurus under the Note, which requires approval of Laurus, includes any
change in Directors such that Daniel Vesco and William M. Simmons are no
longer Directors of Texaurus; and
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
amend
the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus to provide that
the date we are required to gain effectiveness of a registration statement
registering the shares of common stock issuable in connection with the
exercise of the Laurus Warrant in the Company is amended to no later than
April 30, 2008, and that the effective date of any additional registration
statements required to be filed by us in connection with the Registration
Rights Agreement, shall be thirty (30) days from such filing
date. In the future, we currently anticipate offering Laurus
cashless exercise rights in connection with the Texhoma Warrant in lieu of
registering such shares on a Registration Statement; however, there can be
no assurance that Laurus will accept such exercise rights in lieu of
registration.
|
On or
about November 28, 2007, we entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual
Release (the “Jacobs Agreement”) by and between the Company, Frank A. Jacobs,
our former officer and Director (“Jacobs”), and Jacobs Oil & Gas Limited, a
British Columbia corporation (“JOGL” and collectively with Jacobs, the “Jacobs
Parties”), Clover Capital, a creditor of the Company (“Clover”), Capersia Pte.
Ltd., a Singapore company and a significant stockholder of the Company
(“Capersia”), Peter Wilson, an individual and a former Director of the Company
(“Wilson”), and Sterling Grant Capital, Inc., a British Columbia corporation,
controlled by Mr. Wilson (“SGC” and collectively with Clover, Capersia and
Wilson, the “Non-Jacobs Parties,” and with the Jacobs Parties, the “Interested
Parties”). We had various disputes with the Interested Parties
relating to the issuances of and transfers of various shares of our common stock
and various of the Interested Parties had alleged that we owed them
consideration (the “Disputes”). We entered into the Jacobs Agreement
to settle the Disputes with the Interested Parties.
In
consideration for the Jacobs Agreement, the Jacobs Parties agreed
to: return to the Company for cancellation 5,000,000 of the 7,500,000
shares purchased by Jacobs in March 2006 (the “Jacobs Shares”), which shares
have been cancelled to date; discharge and forgive all debt owed by Texhoma
to the Jacobs Parties, known or unknown, including the total
outstanding amount of the approximately $500,000 Promissory Note owed to Frank
A. Jacobs by the Company (the “Jacobs Note”); the Company owes Jacobs no rights
to contribution and/or indemnification in connection with Jacobs employment with
the Company; Jacobs also certified the accuracy and correctness of the Company’s
previously prepared annual and interim financial statements and periodic
reports, relating to the time period of his employment from the period ending
September 30, 2005 to the period ending March 31, 2007; the Jacobs Parties
agreed they have no interest in and will not interfere with the issuance of or
any subsequent transfers of shares to or from Lucayan Oil and Gas Investments,
Ltd. (the “LOGI Shares”), a Bahamas corporation; Jacobs agreed to use his best
efforts to answer the Company’s questions and produce documents in the future
regarding operations and financials of the Company; Jacobs agreed that he no
longer holds any exercisable options of the Company; the Voting Agreement
entered into between various parties in June 2007, including Jacobs, remains in
full affect and force against Jacobs; and Jacobs has no interest in any shares
other than the aforementioned 2,500,000 shares.
Additionally,
in consideration for the Company agreeing to enter into the Jacobs Agreement,
the Non-Jacobs Parties agreed to the following terms: any and all debts owed by
Texhoma to Clover, which purportedly totaled approximately $60,000, Capersia,
which purportedly totaled $60,000 or any of the Non-Jacobs Parties (including
approximately $20,000 purportedly owed to Wilson) was discharged and forgiven;
the Non-Jacobs Parties agreed that they have no interest in and will not
interfere with the issuance of the LOGI Shares; the Voting Agreement remains in
full force and effect against Capersia; and in
connection
with the 30,000,000 shares of Company stock in Capersia’s possession received
through Texhoma’s previous purchase of a 40% interest in Black Swan Petroleum
Pty. Ltd. (the “Capersia Shares”), Capersia will not transfer shares in excess
of 2% of Texhoma’s then outstanding shares in any three (3) month period, until
the second anniversary of the Jacobs Agreement.
Lastly,
in consideration for the Jacobs Parties and the Non-Jacobs Parties agreeing to
the terms of the agreement, Texhoma agreed; Jacobs will retain the
remaining 2,500,000 shares of Company stock and Capersia will retain the
aforementioned 30,000,000 shares of Company stock free and clear of any claims
to such shares by the Company; and JOGL shall retain all rights to the 200,000
shares of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. (“Morgan Creek”) shares held in trust by
JOGL as collateral for the promissory note issued to JOGL by the Company (the
“Jacobs Note” and “Morgan Creek Shares”), the Company will release all claims to
said shares or any additional shares of Morgan Creek that the Company may be due
as a result of stock splits or share distributions.
Further,
pursuant to the Jacobs Agreement, the Interested Parties agreed to release the
Company from any and all rights, obligations, claims, demands and causes of
action, known or unknown, asserted or unasserted relating to the Disputes or the
Company or its current or former Directors, and the Company agreed to release
the Jacobs Parties and the Non-Jacobs Parties from any and all rights,
obligations, claims, demands, and causes of action arising from or relating to
the Capersia Shares, Jacobs’ employment with the Company, the Jacobs Note, the
Jacobs Shares, the Morgan Creek shares, and the LOGI Shares.
As a
result of the Jacobs Agreement, the Company settled approximately $640,000 in
debt which it purportedly owed to the various Interested Parties and to settle
any and all other claims which such parties, in return for the consideration
discussed above, with the release of 200,000 shares of Morgan Creek Energy Corp.
stock to Frank A. Jacobs, which shares had an approximate value of $92,000 based
on the trading price of Morgan Creek Energy Corp.’s common stock on the date of
the Jacobs Agreement of $0.46.
In April
2008, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release with
William M. Simmons and Valeska (the “Simmons Release”). Pursuant to
the Simmons Release, Mr. Simmons agreed to resign as an officer and Director of
the Company and Texaurus and Valeska and agreed to serve as a consultant to the
Company on a limited basis for a period of six months following such
resignation. Additionally, Mr. Simmons and the Company agreed to
mutually release each other and our assigns from any and all rights,
obligations, claims, demands or causes of action, known or unknown relating to
any issue whatsoever in connection with the Simmons Release. We also
agreed to issue Mr. Simmons 6,500,000 shares of common stock in connection with
his entry into the Settlement Agreement, which shares have not been issued to
date, and have not been included in the number of issued and outstanding shares
disclosed throughout this report.
Through
the Company’s conversations and discussions with Laurus regarding the Company’s
inability to file its required registration statement within the time periods
set forth in the First Amendment, the Company agreed to grant Laurus warrants to
purchase an additional 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an
exercise price of $0.02 per share. However, as of the date of this
filing, the Company has not finalized this anticipated grant and as such, the
grant is not reflected in the Company’s financial statements contained
herein.
Plan of
Operations
The
Company’s current plan of operations for the next twelve (12) months is to
increase the liquidity of the Company by working to decrease the Company’s
current liabilities.
We
believe that we can continue operations for the next ninety days by reducing
general and administrative costs and negotiating extended payment options with
our creditors. We anticipate needing to raise approximately $500,000 in the next
twelve months to repay our current liabilities. There can be no
assurance that we will be successful. Additionally, due to the fact
that the assets held by Texaurus are not generating the level of revenue as
originally anticipated, and that our liabilities owed to Laurus are far in
excess of the value of our assets, we may need to raise additional capital in
Texaurus to repay the Laurus Note and/or for working capital purposes in the
future, which funds may be raised through the sale of debt and/or equity in
Texaurus. Furthermore, due to the fact that our liabilities are
greater than our assets and we do not believe that such assets will generate a
sufficient amount of revenue to repay our obligations to
Laurus,
we believe that the only way we will be able to satisfy our debt owed to Laurus
would be to enter into an acquisition or merger in the future, which we do not
currently have any plans to enter into or agreements
regarding. Additionally, Laurus and/or entities affiliated with
Laurus have expressed an interest in providing us additional funding in the
future in connection with a potential acquisition target, assuming it believes
such financing would be in its best interest following customary due diligence,
of which there can be no assurance. If we are able to find a
potential acquisition target and if Laurus and/or entities affiliated with
Laurus commit to loan us additional funds, we anticipate such funding having a
dilutive effect on our existing shareholders. Furthermore, there can
be no assurance that in the event we are able to successfully complete a new
acquisition and related funding, that we will generate sufficient revenues, if
any, to repay the Laurus debt and/or meet our current operating expenses and
current liabilities. In the event we are unable to repay the Laurus
debt in the future, we will likely be forced to curtail our operations and/or
may be forced to cease our filings with the Commission and/or petition for
bankruptcy protection.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 COMPARED TO THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 2007
Revenues
were $429,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 compared with $438,000 for
the quarter ended March 31, 2007, a decrease in revenues of $9,000 or 2% from
the prior period. Revenues were the result of our interest in various
oil and gas properties and as such actual production varies from month to month
and quarter to quarter.
We
incurred oil and gas exploration expenses of $107,000 for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008, compared to $244,000 for the quarter ended March 31,
2007. The Company’s properties underwent workovers during the fiscal
quarter ended December 31, 2007, and as a result the joint operating costs of
the producing properties were reduced for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as
compared with the same quarter in 2007 as the properties had less
operations.
Depletion
and depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 was $134,000
as compared to $149,000 for the same quarter of 2007, a decrease of
$15,000. The reduction in depletion reflects the declining depletion
asset base for the properties based upon their declining production
lives.
We
incurred $361,000 in general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008, compared to $128,000 for the same period in 2007, an increase of
$233,000 from the prior period. The majority of the increase is the
result of the issuance of 18,200,000 shares of our common stock to Valeska in
connection with and pursuant to the terms of the Management
Agreement.
In
connection with our raising the necessary capital funding to pursue the planned
oil and gas purchases we issued stock warrants to new subscribers of our common
stock as well and our lenders. Stock accretion expense was computed
based upon the Black-Scholes modeling and recorded as warrants were
issued. As a result of the continued Black Scholes modeling, we
recognized $8,000 in related stock accretion expense for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008 as compared with a stock accretion gain
of $274,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
We
recorded an impairment in our investment in Morgan Creek Energy of $54,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared with none for the same period in
2008, in connection with the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release we entered
into with our former officer and Director, Frank Jacobs, described above,
pursuant to which Mr. Jacobs retained the Morgan Creek Energy shares which he
held, which shares were previously held by him in trust for our benefit. In
conjunction with the release received from Mr. Jacobs in connection
with the amounts that we purportedly owed him, we recorded a $50,000 gain on the
extinguishment of debt for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared
with no extinguishment of debt for the same period ended March 31,
2007.
We
incurred net interest expense of $245,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2008, in connection with the payment of interest on the Laurus Note
as compared with net interest expense of $291,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2007.
We
reported a net loss of $375,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as compared
to a net loss of $152,000 for the same quarter in 2007, an increase in net loss
of $223,000 from the prior period. The main
reasons
for the increase in net loss were the increase in general and administrative
expense in connection with the issuance of our common stock to Valeska and the
change from a stock accretion gain to a stock accretion expense associated with
options issued based upon the Black Scholes computations for the three months
ended March 31, 2008, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2007, as
described in greater detail above.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 2007
Revenues
were $847,000 for the six month period ended March 31, 2008 compared with
$915,000 for the six month period ended March 31, 2007, a decrease in revenues
of $68,000 from the prior period. Revenues were the result of our
interest in various oil and gas properties and as such actual production varies
from month to month and quarter to quarter.
We
incurred oil and gas exploration expenses of $345,000 for the six months ended
March 31, 2008, compared to $351,000 for the same period ended March 31,
2007.
Depletion
and depreciation expense for the six months ended March 31, 2008 was $299,000 as
compared to $367,000 for the same six months of 2007, a decrease of
$68,000. The reduction in depletion reflects the declining depletion
asset base for the properties based upon their declining production
lives.
We
incurred $20,000 in general and administrative expenses for the six month period
ended March 31, 2008, compared to $374,000 for the same period in 2007, a
decrease of $354,000 from the prior period. The majority of the
decrease is the result of the stock accretion income reported per the Black
Scholes computation methods of $586,000, netted with the issuance of 18,200,000
shares of our common stock to Valeska in connection with and pursuant to the
terms of the Management Agreement, and increased legal and accounting expenses
incurred in conjunction with efforts to bring our regulatory reporting current
with the SEC.
In
connection with our raising the necessary capital funding to pursue the planned
oil and gas purchases we issued stock warrants to new subscribers of our common
stock as well and our lenders. Stock accretion expense was computed
based upon the Black-Scholes modeling and recorded as warrants were
issued. As a result of the continued Black Scholes modeling, we
recognized an $82,000 stock accretion gain for the six months ended March 31,
2008 as compared with an $803,000 stock accretion gain for the six months ended
March 31, 2007.
We
recorded an impairment in our investment in Morgan Creek Energy of $250,000 for
the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared with none for the same period in
2008, in connection with the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release we entered
into with our former officer and Director, Frank Jacobs, described above,
pursuant to which Mr. Jacobs retained the Morgan Creek Energy shares which he
held, which shares were previously held by him in trust for our
benefit
In
conjunction with the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release we entered into
with our former officer and Director, Frank Jacobs, Mr. Jacobs
forgave amounts that we purportedly owed him. We recorded a $420,000
gain on the extinguishment of debt for the six month period ended March 31, 2008
as compared with no extinguishment of debt for the same period ended March 31,
2007.
We
incurred net interest expense of $520,000 for the six months ended March 31,
2008, mainly in connection with the payment of interest on the Laurus
Note as compared with net interest expense of $588,000 for the six months ended
March 31, 2007.
We
reported net income of $168,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2008 as
compared to a net loss of $205,000 for the same period in 2007, an increase in
net income of $373,000 from the prior period. The main reasons for
the increase in income were the decrease in general and administrative expenses,
the fact that there was no loss on investment during the six months ended March
31, 2008, and the gain on extinguishment of debt, offset by the decrease in
stock accretion gain for the six months ended March 31, 2008, compared to the
six months ended March 31, 2007.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As
of March 31, 2008, we had total assets of $5,096,000, consisting of
cash of $37,000, accounts receivable of $275,000, net oil and gas
properties of $4,455,000 and other assets of $329,000.
We had
current liabilities of $1,455,000, consisting of $753,000 of accounts payable,
$402,000 of accrued expenses, $50,000 of notes payable to related parties, and
$250,000 of convertible notes payable, relating to the notes sold in November
and December 2007, as described below, and a long term note payable of
$7,935,000 at March 31, 2008. On December 7, 2004, the Company
borrowed $50,000 from a related party, MFS Technology. The loan is
evidenced by a convertible promissory note. The loan bears interest
at 5% per annum calculated 6 months after the advancement of
funds. $25,000 was due on June 7, 2005 and the remaining balance,
plus interest was due on December 7, 2005. The loan has not been
repaid, extended or converted. The lender has the option during the term of the
loan, and any extension, to convert the principle and interest into shares of
common stock at a conversion price of $0.30 per share.
We had
negative working capital of $1,143,000 and a retained deficit of $14,837,000 at
March 31, 2008.
For the
six months ended March 31, 2008, cash of $345,000 was provided by our operating
activities and we used $198,000 in our investing
activities. Cash provided by operating activities consisted
mainly of $168,000 of net income and non cash items of $440,000, offset by a net
reduction in liabilities of $263,000.
We used
$198,000 in our investing activities for the six months ended March 31, 2008,
solely due to oil and gas property investments.
We used
$374,000 in our financing activities for the six months ended March 31, 2008,
due to proceeds of $250,000 from notes payable sold in November and December
2007 and repayment of a portion of the note payable to Laurus of
$220,000, offset by the forgiveness of affiliate loans of $403,000, which amount
was forgiven by our former officer and Director, Frank Jacobs in connection with
the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, described above.
FUNDING
TRANSACTIONS:
We raised
an aggregate of $297,500 through the sale of 23,800,000 shares of common stock
at $0.0125 per share between May and July 2007.
We raised
an aggregate of $250,000 through the sale of two convertible notes with warrants
to an investor in November and December 2007.
We used
the majority of the funding to pay our general and administrative expenses and
certain acquisitions including the purchase of the Leases from Sunray and the
Management Agreement with Valeska, as described above.
We
believe that we currently have sufficient funds to repay the interest on the
Secured Term Note with Laurus, through the payment of production payments on the
properties owned by Texaurus. We are not able to repay the principal
which is approximately $7,900,000 (less any future payments of
principal we are able to make) on March 27, 2009, and we can provide no
assurances that funds will be available when the Note is due.
The
Company remains reliant on raising further equity funds to grow, and continued
oil and gas operations could be impaired by limitations on our access to capital
markets. In the event that we or Texaurus do not generate the amount of revenues
from our oil and gas properties which we anticipate, and/or we or Texaurus
decide to purchase additional oil and gas properties and are required to raise
additional financing, we may have to scale back our operations which would have
a material adverse impact upon our ability to pursue our business plan. There
can be no assurance that capital from outside sources will be available. If such
financing is available, it may involve issuing securities senior
to Texhoma common stock, the common stock of Texaurus, additional
shares of the common stock of Texaurus or equity financings which are dilutive
to holders of our common stock, which failure may also cause us to scale back or
curtail implementing our business plan.
We have
no current commitments from our officers and Directors or any of our
shareholders to supplement our operations or provide us with financing in the
future. If we are unable to raise additional capital from conventional sources
and/or additional sales of stock in the future, we may be forced to curtail or
cease our operations. Even if we are able to continue our operations, the
failure to obtain financing could have a substantial adverse effect on our
business and financial results.
RISK
FACTORS
You
should carefully consider the following risk factors and other information in
our latest annual report on Form 10-KSB before deciding to become a holder of
our Common Stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business and
financial results could be negatively affected to a significant
extent.
WE
WILL NEED ADDITIONAL FINANCING TO CONTINUE OUR BUSINESS PLAN AND DRILL AND STUDY
ADDITIONAL WELLS. IF WE ARE UNABLE TO RAISE THE FINANCING WE MAY BE
FORCED TO SCALE BACK OR ABANDON OUR BUSINESS PLAN.
WE
OWE LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD., A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF MONEY WHICH WE DO NOT
HAVE.
We raised
$8,500,000 from the sale of a Secured Term Note to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
("Laurus") in March 2006 and approximately $7,900,000 of the amount
was used to purchase the Intracoastal City property, the interests in
the Barnes Creek gas field , the Edgerly field and to pay closing costs and fees
in connection with the funding transaction.
We raised
an aggregate of $297,500 through the sale of 23,800,000 shares of common stock
at $0.0125 per share between May and July 2007. We raised an
aggregate of $250,000 through the sale of two units consisting of Convertible
Promissory Notes with a conversion price of $0.0125 per share, convertible at
the option of Purchaser, into the Company’s common stock, and Class A and Class
B Warrants to purchase 5,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price
of $0.02 and $0.03 per share, respectively, exercisable for a period of two
years from the date of the Subscription Agreement (the “Units”)
We may
not have sufficient funds to continue to pay the interest payments required on
the Secured Term Note with Laurus, through the payment of production payments on
the properties owned by Texaurus on an ongoing basis. We are
currently in negotiations with Laurus to amend the terms of the Secured Term
Note, which there can be no assurance will be amended. Additionally,
we will need to repay the principal balance on March 27, 2009, which is
$7,900,000 (minus any future payments of principal on the Note), which funds we
do not currently have and which we can provide no assurances will be available
when the Note is due. As such, if we are unable to come to terms with
Laurus regarding the amendment and/or revision of the terms of the Secured Term
Note, we will likely not be able to continue our business operations past March
27, 2009. Not including these substantial funds we will require we
also require approximately $300,000 of additional capital to continue our
planned oil and gas operations and seek out new acquisitions.
Finally,
we may choose to spend additional monies on the purchases of oil and gas
properties in the future. Depending on the decisions of our management, the
volatility of the prices of oil and/or gas, our exploration activities, and/or
potential liability, and the amount of money we receive from the sale of oil and
gas, if any, we may need to raise additional capital substantially faster than
six months, which we currently estimate such previously borrowed monies will
last. We do not currently have any additional commitments or identified sources
of additional capital from third parties or from our officers, directors or
majority shareholders. We can provide no assurance that additional financing
will be available on favorable terms, if at all. If we are not able to raise the
capital necessary to continue our business operations, we may be forced to
abandon or curtail our business plan and/or suspend our exploration
activities.
Additionally,
we cannot be sure that in the future we will find any commercial quantities of
oil and/or gas on our properties, that our current properties will continue to
produce or that current production will be sufficient to repay the interest (or
principal) on the Laurus Note. If we fail to raise money, we could be forced to
abandon or curtail our business operations, which could cause any investment in
the Company to become worthless.
BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT
THE COMPANY HAS LIABILITIES FAR IN EXCESS OF ITS ASSETS; THE ASSETS OF TEXAURUS
HAVE NOT, OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS, BEEN GENERATING SUFFICIENT REVENUE TO
PAY THE ACCRUED INTEREST ON THE LAURUS NOTE OR THE EXPENSES OF TEXAURUS; AND
BECAUSE OF THE SIGNIFICANT DOWNWARD PRESSURE ON THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK, THE
COMPANY’S MANAGEMENT IS CONSIDERING VARIOUS OPTIONS WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT
LIMITED TO, DEREGISTERING WITH THE SEC, SEEKING INVESTMENT IN TEXAURUS
FROM
ENTITIES OTHER THAN TEXHOMA AND PURSUING OPPORTUNITIES OUTSIDE AND DISTINCT FROM
TEXHOMA.
As of
March 31, 2008, the Company had total liabilities of $9,389,746 and total assets
of only $5,095,500. The Company does not believe that the Texaurus assets will
generate sufficient revenue in the future to enable the Company to repay the
Laurus Note. Additionally, over the past several months, the production payments
payable to the Company from the Texaurus assets have not been sufficient to pay
the accrued interest on the Laurus Note, and the Company can provide no
assurances that such production payments will be sufficient to repay the
interest on the Laurus Note in the future, and/or that the Company will not be
in default of such note. The Company does not believe that it will be able to
raise sufficient additional capital through the sale of equity, if at all, as
there is downward pressure on the Company’s common stock. Currently, there is
significant downward pressure on the Company’s common stock on the
Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board, which the Company believes is making it
difficult to create a trading market and preventing it from raising additional
funding through equity financings on acceptable terms to the Company. If the
Company’s current management believes that the Company will not be able to repay
the Laurus Note and/or interest thereon, and/or if the Company’s common stock
continues to have significant downward pressure, the Company’s management may
choose to pursue opportunities outside of the Company that may be in competition
with the Company or impact the Company in a negative manner. If that were to
happen, it is possible that the Company would cease filing reports with the
Commission and /or the value of the Company’s common stock could become
worthless. Additionally, in the future, the Company’s current management may
work outside of the Company to start a new company with similar operations as
the Company if they believe that the Company will not be able to repay the
Laurus Note and/or not be able to raise capital on acceptable
terms.
WE
OWE LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD., A SUBSTANTIAL
AMOUNT OF MONEY
WHICH WE DO NOT HAVE.
In
connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement, Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
("Laurus"), purchased an $8,500,000 Secured Term Note from Texaurus, which we
have guaranteed, and which bears interest at the rate of 8% per year (as of
February 6, 2007), which is due and payable on March 27, 2009, and which
principal and interest is repayable by way of production payments equal to 80%
of the gross production revenue received by Texaurus in connection with the
Intracoastal City Field, the Edgerly Field and the Barnes Creek
Properties.
There can
be no assurance that we will have sufficient funds to pay any principal or
interest on the Note when due on March 27, 2009, if such repayment amount is not
sufficiently covered by the payment of production proceeds to Laurus, as
described above, and we do not currently believe that such production payments
will be sufficient to repay such Note or such interest as of the date of this
filing. If we do not have sufficient funds to pay the total remaining amount of
the Note (after taking into account payments of principal, which we may not have
sufficient funds to pay) when due, we will be in default and Laurus may take
control of substantially all of our assets (as described in more detail under
"Risks Relating to the Company's Securities"). As a result, we will need to
raise or otherwise generate approximately $8,500,000 to repay the Note (not
including any adjustments for payment of principal in connection with production
payments paid by Texaurus) by March 27, 2009. If we fail to raise this money, we
could be forced to abandon or curtail our business operations, which could cause
any investment in the Company to become worthless.
OUR
ESTIMATES OF RESERVES COULD HAVE FLAWS, OR MAY NOT ULTIMATELY TURN OUT TO BE
CORRECT OR COMMERCIALLY EXTRACTABLE AND AS A RESULT, OUR FUTURE REVENUES AND
PROJECTIONS COULD BE INCORRECT.
Estimates
of reserves and of future net revenues prepared by different petroleum engineers
may vary substantially depending, in part, on the assumptions made and may be
subject to adjustment either up or down in the future. Our actual amounts of
production, revenue, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses, and
quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves may vary substantially from
the estimates. Oil and gas reserve estimates are necessarily inexact
and involve matters of subjective engineering judgment. In addition, any
estimates of our future net revenues and the present value thereof are based on
assumptions derived in part from historical price and cost information, which
may not reflect current and future values,
and/or
other assumptions made by us that only represent our best estimates. If these
estimates of quantities, prices and costs prove inaccurate, we may be
unsuccessful in expanding our oil and gas reserves base with our acquisitions.
We have been advised by the petroleum engineer for the Company that the Texaurus
assets may require further impairment than the amount which has been
recognized. During the year ended September 30, 2006, we recognized
an impairment in connection with the estimated future value of the Texaurus
assets of $2,682,000. We will update our disclosure regarding any
additional impairment in the future when such information is
available. Additionally, if declines in and instability of oil and
gas prices occur, then additional write downs in the capitalized costs
associated with our oil and gas assets may be required. Because of the nature of
the estimates of our reserves and estimates in general, we can provide no
assurance that additional or further reductions to our estimated proved oil and
gas reserves and estimated future net revenues will not be required in the
future, and/or that our estimated reserves will be present and/or commercially
extractable. If our reserve estimates are incorrect, the value of our common
stock could decrease and we may be forced to write down the capitalized costs of
our oil and gas properties.
WE
RELY HEAVILY ON DANIEL VESCO, OUR OFFICER AND DIRECTOR, AND IF HE WERE TO
LEAVE, WE COULD FACE SUBSTANTIAL COSTS IN SECURING A SIMILARLY QUALIFIED OFFICER
AND DIRECTOR.
Our
success depends upon the personal efforts and abilities of Daniel Vesco, our
Chief Executive Officer and Director. Our ability to operate and implement our
exploration activities is heavily dependent on the continued service of Mr.
Vesco and our ability to attract qualified contractors and consultants on an
as-needed basis.
We face
continued competition for such contractors and consultants, and may face
competition for the services of Mr. Vesco in the future. We do not have an
employment contract with Mr. Vesco, nor do we currently have any key man
insurance on Mr. Vesco. Mr. Vesco is our driving force and is responsible for
maintaining our relationships and operations. We cannot be certain that we will
be able to retain Mr. Vesco and/or attract and retain such contractors and
consultants in the future. The loss of Mr. Vesco, and/or our inability to
attract and retain qualified contractors and consultants on an as-needed basis
could have a material adverse effect on our business and
operations.
BECAUSE
OF THE SPECULATIVE NATURE OF OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION, THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL RISK
THAT NO ADDITIONAL COMMERCIALLY EXPLOITABLE OIL OR GAS WILL BE FOUND AND THAT
OUR BUSINESS WILL FAIL.
The
search for commercial quantities of oil as a business is extremely risky. We
cannot provide investors with any assurance that our properties contain
commercially exploitable quantities of oil and/or gas.
The
exploration expenditures to be made by us may not result in the discovery of
commercial quantities of oil and/or gas and problems such as unusual or
unexpected formations and other conditions involved in oil and gas exploration,
and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts. If we are unable to find
commercially exploitable quantities of oil and gas, and/or we are unable to
commercially extract such quantities, we may be forced to abandon or curtail our
business plan, and as a result, any investment in us may become
worthless.
OUR
TOTAL AMOUNT OF ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING SHARE AMOUNTS MAY BE INCORRECT, AND WE
MAY HAVE OUTSTANDING SHARES WHICH ARE UNACCOUNTED FOR.
We have
become aware of a subscription agreement relating to the sale of certain shares
of our common stock in February 2005, which shares have not been issued to date,
and which subscription agreement we have been unable to verify as of the date of
this filing. As a result of the subscription agreement, and our
previous failure to issue shares in connection with such subscription agreement,
we may have potential liability for such shareholder’s loss of liquidity and/or
the decline in the value of our common stock. Additionally, there may
be other subscription agreements which we are not aware of relating to the sale
of our common stock, which sales and issuances are not currently reflected with
our Transfer Agent and/or in the number of outstanding shares of common stock
disclosed throughout this report. As a result, we may have a larger number of
shares outstanding than we currently show on our shareholders list. This
difference, if present, may force us to revise our filings and/or may mean that
the ownership percentage of
certain
shares of common stock disclosed throughout this report is
incorrect. If we are required to issue additional shares of common
stock in the future relating to previous subscription agreements which our
current management was and/or is not aware, it could cause substantial dilution
to our existing shareholders and/or we could face potential liability in
connection with our failure to issue such shares when originally
subscribed.
BECAUSE
OF THE INHERENT DANGERS INVOLVED IN OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION, THERE IS A RISK
THAT WE MAY INCUR LIABILITY OR DAMAGES AS WE CONDUCT OUR BUSINESS OPERATIONS,
WHICH COULD FORCE US TO EXPEND A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF MONEY IN CONNECTION WITH
LITIGATION AND/OR A SETTLEMENT.
The oil
and natural gas business involves a variety of operating hazards and risks such
as well blowouts, pipe failures, casing collapse, explosions, uncontrollable
flows of oil, natural gas or well fluids, fires, spills, pollution, releases of
toxic gas and other environmental hazards and risks. These hazards and risks
could result in substantial losses to us from, among other things, injury or
loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property, natural resources and
equipment, pollution or other environmental damage, cleanup responsibilities,
regulatory investigation and penalties and suspension of operations. In
addition, we may be liable for environmental damages caused by previous owners
of property purchased and leased by us. As a result, substantial liabilities to
third parties or governmental entities may be incurred, the payment of which
could reduce or eliminate the funds available for exploration, development or
acquisitions or result in the loss of our properties and/or force us to expend
substantial monies in connection with litigation or settlements. As such, there
can be no assurance that any insurance obtained by us will be adequate to cover
any losses or liabilities. We cannot predict the availability of insurance or
the availability of insurance at premium levels that justify our purchase. The
occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against could
materially and adversely affect our financial condition and operations. We may
elect to self-insure if management believes that the cost of insurance, although
available, is excessive relative to the risks presented. In addition, pollution
and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. The occurrence of an
event not fully covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations, which could lead to any
investment in us becoming worthless.
WE
REQUIRE SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONAL FINANCING TO CONTINUE OUR EXPLORATION AND
DRILLING ACTIVITIES, WHICH FINANCING IS OFTEN HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON THE CURRENT
MARKET PRICE FOR OIL AND GAS, WHICH WE ARE UNABLE TO PREDICT.
Our
growth and continued operations could be impaired by limitations on our access
to capital markets. If the market for oil and/or gas were to weaken for an
extended period of time, our ability to raise capital would be substantially
reduced. There can be no assurance that capital from outside sources will be
available, or that if such financing is available, that it will not involve
issuing securities senior to the common stock or equity financings which will be
dilutive to holders of common stock. Such issuances, if made, would likely cause
a decrease in the value of our common stock.
THE
MARKET FOR OIL AND GAS IS INTENSELY COMPETITIVE, AND AS SUCH, COMPETITIVE
PRESSURES COULD FORCE US TO ABANDON OR CURTAIL OUR BUSINESS PLAN.
The
market for oil and gas exploration services is highly competitive, and we only
expect competition to intensify in the future. Numerous well-established
companies are focusing significant resources on exploration and are currently
competing with us for oil and gas opportunities. Additionally, there are
numerous companies focusing their resources on creating fuels and/or materials
which serve the same purpose as oil and gas, but are manufactured from renewable
resources. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will be able to
compete successfully or that competitive pressures will not adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition. If we are not able to
successfully compete in the marketplace, we could be forced to curtail or even
abandon our current business plan, which could cause any investment in us to
become worthless.
WE
MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY MANAGE OUR GROWTH, WHICH COULD LEAD TO OUR
INABILITY TO IMPLEMENT OUR BUSINESS PLAN.
Our
growth is expected to place a significant strain on our managerial, operational
and financial resources, especially considering that we currently only have two
Directors and a small number of executive officers and employees. Further, as we
enter into additional contracts, we will be required to manage multiple
relationships with various consultants, businesses and other third parties.
These requirements will be exacerbated in the event of our further growth or in
the event that the number of our drilling and/or extraction operations
increases. There can be no assurance that our systems, procedures and/or
controls will be adequate to support our operations or that our management will
be able to achieve the rapid execution necessary to successfully implement our
business plan. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, our business,
results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected, which
could lead to us being forced to abandon or curtail our business plan and
operations.
THE
PRICE OF OIL AND NATURAL GAS HAS HISTORICALLY BEEN VOLATILE AND IF IT WERE TO
DECREASE SUBSTANTIALLY, OUR PROJECTIONS, BUDGETS, AND REVENUES WOULD BE
ADVERSELY EFFECTED, AND WE WOULD LIKELY BE FORCED TO MAKE MAJOR CHANGES IN OUR
OPERATIONS.
Our
future financial condition, results of operations and the carrying value of our
oil and natural gas properties depend primarily upon the prices we receive for
our oil and natural gas production. Oil and natural gas prices historically have
been volatile and likely will continue to be volatile in the future, especially
given current world geopolitical conditions. Our cash flows from operations are
highly dependent on the prices that we receive for oil and natural gas. This
price volatility also affects the amount of our cash flows available for capital
expenditures and our ability to borrow money or raise additional capital. The
prices for oil and natural gas are subject to a variety of additional factors
that are beyond our control. These factors include:
o
the level of consumer demand for oil and natural gas;
|
|
o
the domestic and foreign supply of oil and natural gas;
|
|
o
the ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries ("OPEC") to agree to and maintain oil price and production
controls;
|
|
o
the price of foreign oil and natural gas;
|
|
o
domestic governmental regulations and taxes;
|
|
o
the price and availability of alternative fuel sources;
|
|
o
weather conditions;
|
|
o
market uncertainty due to political conditions in oil and natural gas
producing regions, including the Middle East; and
|
|
o
worldwide economic conditions.
|
These
factors as well as the volatility of the energy markets generally make it
extremely difficult to predict future oil and natural gas price movements with
any certainty. Declines in oil and natural gas prices would not only reduce our
revenue, but could reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we can produce
economically and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect upon our
financial condition, results of operations, oil and natural gas reserves and the
carrying values of our oil and natural gas properties. If the oil and natural
gas industry experiences significant price declines, we may be unable to make
planned expenditures, among other things. If this were to happen, we may be
forced to abandon or curtail our business operations, which would cause the
value of an investment in us to decline in value, or become
worthless.
OUR
OPERATIONS ARE HEAVILY DEPENDENT ON CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, WHICH WE
ARE UNABLE TO PREDICT, AND WHICH MAY CHANGE IN THE FUTURE, CAUSING US TO EXPEND
SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONAL CAPITAL.
Public
interest in the protection of the environment has increased dramatically in
recent years. Our oil and natural gas production and our processing, handling
and disposal of hazardous materials, such as hydrocarbons and naturally
occurring radioactive materials (if any) are subject to stringent regulation. We
could incur significant costs, including cleanup costs resulting from a release
of hazardous material, third-party claims for property damage and personal
injuries fines and sanctions, as a result of any violations or liabilities under
environmental or other laws. Changes in or more stringent enforcement of
environmental laws could force us to expend additional operating costs and
capital expenditures to stay in compliance.
Various
federal, state and local laws regulating the discharge of materials into the
environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment,
directly impact oil and gas exploration, development and production operations,
and consequently may impact our operations and costs. These regulations include,
among others, (i) regulations by the Environmental Protection Agency and various
state agencies regarding approved methods of disposal for certain hazardous and
non-hazardous wastes; (ii) the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
and analogous state laws which regulate the removal or remediation of previously
disposed wastes (including wastes disposed of or released by prior owners or
operators), property contamination (including groundwater contamination), and
remedial plugging operations to prevent future contamination; (iii) the Clean
Air Act and comparable state and local requirements which may result in the
gradual imposition of certain pollution control requirements with respect to air
emissions from our operations; (iv) the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 which contains
numerous requirements relating to the prevention of and response to oil spills
into waters of the United States; (v) the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
which is the principal federal statute governing the treatment, storage and
disposal of hazardous wastes; and (vi) state regulations and statutes governing
the handling, treatment, storage and disposal of naturally occurring radioactive
material.
Management
believes that we are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental
laws and regulations. To date, we have not expended any material amounts to
comply with such regulations, and management does not currently anticipate that
future compliance will have a materially adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, if we are
deemed to not be in compliance with applicable environmental laws, we could be
forced to expend substantial amounts to be in compliance, which would have a
materially adverse effect on our financial condition. If this were to happen,
any investment in us could be lost.
THE
COMPANY HAS ESTABLISHED PREFERRED STOCK WHICH CAN BE DESIGNATED BY THE COMPANY'S
BOARD OF DIRECTORS WITHOUT SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL AND HAS ESTABLISHED SERIES A
PREFERRED STOCK, WHICH GIVES THE HOLDERS MAJORITY VOTING POWER OVER THE
COMPANY.
The
Company has 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, and 1,000 shares of
Series A Preferred Stock authorized. Shares of preferred stock of the Company
may be issued from time to time in one or more series, each of which shall have
distinctive designation or title as shall be determined by the Board of
Directors of the Company ("Board of Directors") prior to the issuance of any
shares thereof. The preferred stock shall have such voting powers, full or
limited, or no voting powers, and such preferences and relative, participating,
optional or other special rights and such qualifications, limitations or
restrictions thereof as adopted by the Board of Directors. Because the Board of
Directors is able to designate the powers and preferences of the preferred stock
without the vote of a majority of the Company's shareholders, shareholders of
the Company will have no control over what designations and preferences the
Company's preferred stock will have. As a result of this, the Company's
shareholders may have less control over the designations and preferences of the
preferred stock and as a result the operations of the Company.
THE
COMPANY HAS ESTABLISHED SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK, WHICH GIVES THE HOLDERS
MAJORITY VOTING POWER OVER THE COMPANY.
The
Company has 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock authorized. All outstanding
shares of Series A Preferred stock, which are all currently held by Valeska
Energy Corp., the beneficial owner of which is
William
M. Simmons, the President and Director of the Company, can vote in aggregate on
all shareholder matters equal to fifty-one percent (51%) of the total vote.
Because of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Valeska Energy Corp., will
effectively exercise voting control over the Company. As a result of this, the
Company's shareholders will have less control over the operations of the
Company.
DANIEL
VESCO, OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CAN EXERCISE VOTING CONTROL OVER CORPORATE
DECISIONS.
Daniel
Vesco (through his personal beneficial ownership and through his voting control
over Valeska Energy Corp. (“Valeska”)) beneficially owns 44,400,000 shares of
common stock, additionally; Valeska holds all 1,000 shares of our outstanding
shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which Series A Preferred Stock, votes in
aggregate, a number of voting shares equal to 51% of our total outstanding
shares of voting stock. As a result, Mr. Vesco will exercise control
in determining the outcome of all corporate transactions or other matters,
including the election of directors, mergers, consolidations, the sale of all or
substantially all of our assets, and also the power to prevent or cause a change
in control. The interests of Mr. Vesco may differ from the interests of the
other stockholders and thus result in corporate decisions that are adverse to
other shareholders.
THE
REMOVAL OF MR. VESCO AS A DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY IS PROTECTED BY VOTING
AGREEMENTS ENTERED INTO WITH THE COMPANY’S MAJORITY SHAREHOLDERS.
Certain
of the Company’s majority shareholders, including Capersia Pte. Ltd., Lucayan
Oil and Gas Investments, Ltd., Frank A. Jacobs (the Company’s former Chief
Executive Officer and Director) and Valeska Energy Corp. (the “Voting
Shareholders”) entered into Voting Agreements whereby they agreed that they
would not vote the aggregate of 71,874,000 shares of common stock which they
hold for (i.e. in favor of) the removal of Mr. Simmons (who has since resigned)
or Mr. Vesco (the “New Directors”) until the expiration of the agreements on
June 5, 2009. The Voting Shareholders also agreed that in the event
of any shareholder vote of the Company (either by Board Meeting, a Consent to
Action without Meeting, or otherwise) relating to the removal of the New
Directors; the re-election of the New Directors; and/or the increase in the
number of directors of the Company during the term of the Voting Agreements,
that such Voting Shareholders would vote their shares against the removal of the
New Directors; for the re-election of such New Directors; and/or vote against
the increase in the number of directors of the Company, without the unanimous
consent of the New Directors, respectively. The Voting Agreements
also included a provisions whereby in the event that either of the New Directors
breaches his fiduciary duty to the Company, including, but not limited to such
New Director’s conviction of an act or acts constituting a felony or other crime
involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, theft or fraud; such New Director’s gross
negligence in connection with his service to the Company as a Director and/or in
any executive capacity which he may hold; and/or if any Voting Shareholder
becomes aware of information which would lead a reasonable person to believe
that such New Director has committed fraud or theft from the Company, or a
violation of the Securities laws (each a “Breach of Fiduciary Duty”),
this voting requirement set forth above shall not apply. As a result
of the Voting Agreements, it will likely be impossible for the shareholders of
the Company to remove Mr. Vesco as a Director of the Company, unless a Breach of
Fiduciary Duty occurs, and even then, due to Valeska’s ownership of the Series A
Preferred Stock (as described above), it will likely be impossible for Mr. Vesco
to be removed as a Director of the Company.
THE
INTERESTS OF MR. VESCO, OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MAY DIFFER FROM THE
INTERESTS OF OUR OTHER SHAREHOLDERS, AND HE MAY ALSO COMPETE WITH THE COMPANY OR
ENTER INTO TRANSACTIONS SEPARATE FROM THE COMPANY.
Mr.
Vesco, our Chief Executive Officer, is involved in business interests separate
from his involvement with the Company, including but not limited to Valeska
Energy Corp., which business and/or companies may also operate in the oil and
gas industry similar to and/or in competition with the Company. Mr. Vesco is
under no obligation to include us in any transactions which he undertakes. As a
result, we may not benefit from connections he makes and/or agreements he enters
into while employed by us, and he, or companies he is associated with,
including, but not limited to Valeska, may profit from transactions which they
undertake while we do not. As a result, he may find it more lucrative
or beneficial to cease serving as an officer or Director of the Company in the
future and may resign from the Company at that time. Furthermore, while employed
by us, shareholders should keep in mind that he is under no obligation to
share his
contacts and/or enter into favorable contracts and/or agreements he may come
across with the Company, and as a result may choose to enter into such contracts
or agreements through companies which he owns, which are not affiliated with us,
and from which we will receive no benefit. Finally, certain of
the agreements he may enter into on our behalf may benefit him more than us,
including, but not limited to the Management Agreement, pursuant to which the
Company currently pays Valeska $20,000 per month.
RISKS RELATING TO THE COMPANY'S
SECURITIES
A
DEFAULT BY US UNDER THE SECURED TERM NOTE, TEXHOMA WARRANT OR TEXAURUS WARRANT,
WOULD ENABLE LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD., TO TAKE CONTROL OF SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF
OUR ASSETS.
The
Secured Term Note, Texhoma Warrant and Texaurus Warrant, are secured by Laurus
by a continuing security interest in all of our assets, including without
limitation, our cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, deposit accounts,
inventory, equipment, goods, fixtures and other tangible and intangible assets,
which we own or at any time in the future may acquire rights, title or interest
to. As a result, if we default under any provision of the Note, Texhoma Warrant
or Texaurus Warrant or we fail to pay any amounts due to Laurus, Laurus may take
control of substantially all of our assets. If this were to happen, we could be
left with no revenue producing assets, and the value of our common stock could
become worthless.
WE
MAY BE REQUIRED TO PAY PENALTIES TO LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD. UNDER THE
REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT, WHICH COULD FORCE US TO EXPEND A SUBSTANTIAL
AMOUNT OF THE MONEY WE HAVE PREVIOUSLY RAISED.
We
granted Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., registration rights to the shares issuable to
Laurus in connection with the Texhoma Warrant, pursuant to a Registration Rights
Agreement In the future, we currently anticipate offering
Laurus cashless exercise rights in connection with the Texhoma Warrant in lieu
of registering such shares on a Registration Statement; however, there can be no
assurance that Texhoma will accept such cashless registration
rights. We agreed pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement to
use our best efforts to file the Registration Statement by May 29, 2006 (60 days
after the Closing) and to obtain effectiveness of such registration statement by
September 25, 2006 (180 days after the Closing), neither of which deadlines we
have met; however, pursuant to the First Amendment (described above), Laurus
agreed to amend the date we are required to have gained effectiveness of the
Registration Statement by, to April 30, 2008, which date was not met; however,
Laurus has not notified us that we are in default of the Registration Rights
Agreement, and as stated above, we hope to remove the registration requirement
associated with the Texhoma Warrants all together and instead give Laurus
cashless exercise rights to the shares issuable in connection with the exercise
of the Texhoma Warrants. Moving forward, should Laurus fail to waive
our registration requirement, and such failure is deemed to be a default under
the Note, we could be forced to pay penalties to Laurus. As a result, we could
be forced to abandon or scale back our current planned operations and/or raise
additional capital, which could cause substantial dilution to our existing
shareholders.
THE
TEXHOMA WARRANT CONTAINS PROVISIONS WHEREBY LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD. MAY HOLD
MORE THAN 4.99% OF OUR COMMON STOCK, PROVIDED THEY PROVIDE US SEVENTY-FIVE (75)
DAYS NOTICE OR AN EVENT OF DEFAULT OCCURS.
Although
Laurus may not exercise its Texhoma Warrant if such exercise would cause it to
own more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock, the Texhoma Warrant also
contains provisions which provide for the 4.99% limit to be waived provided that
Laurus provides us with 75 days notice of its intent to hold more than 4.99% of
our common stock or upon the occurrence of an event of default (as defined under
the Note). As a result, if we receive 75 days notice from Laurus and/or an event
of default occurs, Laurus may fully exercise the Texhoma Warrant and fully
convert the Texhoma Warrant into shares of our common stock. If this were to
happen, it would cause immediate and substantial dilution to our existing
shareholders and if it were to happen when our Registration Statement covering
Laurus' securities has been declared effective, the subsequent sale of such
shares in the marketplace, if affected, could cause the trading value of our
common stock, if any, to decrease substantially.
IF
AN EVENT OF DEFAULT OCCURS UNDER THE NOTE, TEXHOMA WARRANT OR TEXAURUS WARRANT
OR ANY OF THE RELATED AGREEMENTS, WE COULD BE FORCED TO IMMEDIATELY PAY THE
AMOUNTS DUE UNDER THE NOTE.
The
Secured Term Note, Texhoma Warrant and Texaurus Warrant include provisions
whereby Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., may make the amounts outstanding under the
Note due and payable if an event of default occurs under the Note, which events
of default include:
|
o
|
our
failure to pay amounts due under the
Note;
|
|
o
|
breach
of any covenants under the Note, if not cured in the time periods
provided;
|
|
o
|
breach
of any warranties found in the
Note;
|
|
o
|
the
occurrence of any default under any agreement, which causes any contingent
obligation to become due prior to its stated maturity or to become
payable;
|
|
o
|
any
change or occurrence likely to have a material adverse effect on the
business, assets, liabilities, financial condition, our operations or
prospects;
|
|
o
|
an
indictment or other proceedings against us or any executive officer;
or
|
|
o
|
a
breach by us of any provision of the Securities Purchase Agreement, or any
other Related Agreement entered into in connection with the sale of the
Notes.
|
If any
event of default were to occur under the Note and Laurus was to make the entire
amount of the Note immediately due and payable, and we did not have sufficient
funds on hand to pay such amounts, we could be forced to sell some or all of our
assets at less than fair market value, and/or abandon or curtail our business
plan and operations.
THE
ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXERCISE OF THE TEXHOMA WARRANT
WILL CAUSE IMMEDIATE AND SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION.
Once we
are able to file a registration statement covering the shares of common stock
issuable in connection with the exercise of the Texhoma Warrant, which we do not
anticipate being able to file until such time as we are current in our filings,
the issuance of common stock upon exercise of the Texhoma Warrant will result in
immediate and substantial dilution to the interests of other stockholders since
Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., may ultimately receive and sell the full amount
issuable on exercise of the Texhoma Warrant, which has an exercise price of
$0.04 per share, currently more than the average trading value of our common
stock during the past thirty days. Although Laurus may not exercise its warrant
if such conversion or exercise would cause it to own more than 4.99% of our
outstanding common stock (unless Laurus provides us 75 days notice and/or an
event of default occurs, this restriction does not prevent Laurus from
exercising some of its holdings, selling those shares, and then converting the
rest of its holdings, while still staying below the 4.99% limit. In this way,
Laurus could sell more than this limit while never actually holding more shares
than this limit prohibits. If Laurus chooses to do this, it will likely cause
the value of our common stock to decline in value (if such common stock is
trading at more than $0.04 per share prior to such sales) and will likely also
cause substantial dilution to our common stock.
WE
WILL INCUR SIGNIFICANT INCREASED COSTS AS A RESULT OF OPERATING AS A FULLY
REPORTING COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH SECTION 404 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT, AND
OUR MANAGEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED TO DEVOTE SUBSTANTIAL TIME TO NEW COMPLIANCE
INITIATIVES.
Moving
forward, we anticipate incurring significant legal, accounting and other
expenses in connection with our status as a fully reporting public company. The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act") and new rules subsequently
implemented by the SEC have imposed various new requirements on public
companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices. As
such, our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial
amount of time to these new compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and
regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make
some activities more time-consuming and costly. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal controls
for financial reporting and disclosure of controls and procedures. In
particular, for our next Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, we were required to
perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal controls over
financial reporting to allow
management
to report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial
reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. For
fiscal year 2009, Section 404 will require us to obtain a report from our
independent registered public accounting firm attesting to the assessment made
by management. Our testing, or the subsequent testing by our
independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our
internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material
weaknesses. Our compliance with Section 404 will require that we incur
substantial accounting expense and expend significant management efforts. We
currently do not have an internal audit group, and we will need to hire
additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company
experience and technical accounting knowledge. Moreover, if we are not able to
comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, or if we or our
independent registered public accounting firm identifies deficiencies in our
internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material
weaknesses, the market price of our stock could decline, and we could be subject
to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which
would require additional financial and management resources.
IF
WE ARE LATE IN FILING OUR QUARTERLY OR ANNUAL REPORTS WITH THE SEC, WE MAY BE
DE-LISTED FROM THE OVER-THE-COUNTER BULLETIN BOARD.
Pursuant
to Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board ("OTCBB") rules relating to the timely filing
of periodic reports with the SEC, any OTCBB issuer which fails to file a
periodic report (Form 10-QSB's or 10-KSB's) by the due date of such report (not
withstanding any extension granted to the issuer by the filing of a Form
12b-25), three (3) times during any twenty-four (24) month period is
automatically de-listed from the OTCBB. Such removed issuer would not be
re-eligible to be listed on the OTCBB for a period of one-year, during which
time any subsequent late filing would reset the one-year period of de-listing.
If we are late in our filings three times in any twenty-four (24) month period
and are de-listed from the OTCBB, our securities may become worthless and we may
be forced to curtail or abandon our business plan.
THE
MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK MAY CONTINUE TO BE VOLATILE, ILLIQUID AND SPORADIC,
IF WE HAVE A MARKET AT ALL.
The
market for our common stock on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (and prior to
that on the Pinksheets) has historically been volatile, illiquid and sporadic
and is subject to wide fluctuations in response to several factors, including,
but not limited to:
|
(1)
|
actual
or anticipated variations in our results of operations;
|
|
(2)
|
our
ability or inability to generate new revenues;
|
|
(3)
|
increased
competition; and
|
|
(4)
|
conditions
and trends in the oil and gas exploration industry and the market for oil
and gas and petroleum based
products.
|
Our
common stock is traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol
"TXHE." In recent years, the stock market in general has experienced extreme
price fluctuations that have oftentimes been unrelated to the operating
performance of the affected companies. Similarly, the market price of our common
stock may fluctuate significantly based upon factors unrelated or
disproportionate to our operating performance. These market fluctuations, as
well as general economic, political and market conditions, such as recessions,
interest rates or international currency fluctuations may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.
INVESTORS
MAY FACE SIGNIFICANT RESTRICTIONS ON THE RESALE OF OUR COMMON STOCK DUE TO
FEDERAL REGULATIONS OF PENNY STOCKS.
Our
common stock will be subject to the requirements of Rule 15(g)9, promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act as long as the price of our common stock is
below $4.00 per share. Under such rule, broker-dealers who recommend low-priced
securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors
must satisfy special sales practice requirements, including a requirement that
they make an individualized written suitability determination for the purchaser
and receive the purchaser's consent prior to the transaction. The Securities
Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990, also requires
additional disclosure in connection with any trades involving a stock defined as
a penny stock. Generally, the Commission defines a penny stock as any equity
security not traded on an exchange or
quoted on
NASDAQ that has a market price of less than $4.00 per share. The required penny
stock disclosures include the delivery, prior to any transaction, of a
disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated
with it. Such requirements could severely limit the market liquidity of the
securities and the ability of purchasers to sell their securities in the
secondary market. In addition, various state securities laws impose restrictions
on transferring "penny stocks" and as a result, investors in the common stock
may have their ability to sell their shares of the common stock
impaired.
Other
Considerations
There are
numerous factors that affect our business and the results of its operations.
Sources of these factors include general economic and business conditions,
federal and state regulation of business activities, the level of demand for the
Company’s product or services, the level and intensity of competition in the
industry and the pricing pressures that may result, the Company’s ability to
develop new services based on new or evolving technology and the market’s
acceptance of those new services, the Company’s ability to timely and
effectively manage periodic product transitions, and geographic sales mix of any
particular period, and the ability to continue to improve infrastructure
including personnel and systems, to keep pace with the growth in its overall
business activities.
Item
3. Controls and Procedures.
(a)
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our Chief Executive and
Principal Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our
"disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Evaluation Date"), have concluded
that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to
disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Our controls were not effective because we failed
to complete the required audit of Black Swan in compliance with GAAP, and failed
to timely file our 2005, 2006 and 2007 quarterly and annual
reports.
Moving
forward, our current management intends to allocate sufficient resources to
allow us to timely file our periodic and current reports with the
Commission.
(b)
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in
our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal year reported by
this Form 10-QSB, that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Management
of the Company is not aware of any legal proceedings contemplated by any
governmental authority or other party involving the Company or its subsidiaries
or its properties other than those described below. No director, officer or
affiliate of the Company is (i) a party adverse to the Company in any legal
proceedings; or (ii) has an adverse interest to the Company in any legal
proceedings. Management is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or
that have been threatened against the Company, its subsidiaries or its
properties, other than those described below.
The
Company has been threatened with arbitration by ORX Resources, Inc. in
connection with funds which ORX believes it is due in connection with fees and
expenses owed by the Company in connection with the Clovelly Joint
Venture. Our former President and Director, Max Maxwell, formerly
served as Vice President and Director of ORX. ORX has not filed any
formal proceeding against the Company, and the Company hopes to work with
ORX to settle this matter and avoid any formal legal
proceedings.
Matrixx
Resource Holdings Inc. (“Matrixx”) claims the Company owes it approximately
$60,000 in connection with funds that it paid for a backend interest in two of
the Company’s wells on its Manville property, which wells were eventually found
to be dry. The Company believes however, that it does not owe Matrixx the return
of any funds in connection with such payments, as the wells were dry and as such
there was no interest to transfer to Matrixx. In addition, the Company believes
that Matrixx owes it approximately $16,000 in connection with additional fees
and expenses which were paid by the Company, but attributable to Matrixx’s
interest, and which were in addition to the $60,000 previously paid by Matrixx.
While the parties are currently in discussions regarding such debt and we have
been threatened with litigation by Matrixx, neither the Company nor Matrixx has
filed any formal legal proceedings in connection with such debts to
date.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
In
January 2008, Ibrahim Nafi Onat, our Director vested an aggregate of
500,000 shares of our restricted common stock, pursuant to the terms of his
Consulting Agreement. We claim an exemption from registration
afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, for the above issuance,
since the issuance did not involve a public offering, the recipient took the
securities for investment and not resale and the Company took appropriate
measures to restrict transfer. No underwriters or agents were involved in the
issuance and no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid by the
Company.
In
January 2008, we cancelled 5,000,000 shares of common stock originally held by
Frank Jacobs, our former officer and Director, pursuant to the Settlement
Agreement and Mutual Release entered into in November 2007, as described in
greater detail above.
In
January 2008, we issued an aggregate of 18,200,000 restricted shares of common
stock to Valeska in consideration for Valeska reaching certain goals pursuant to
the Management Services Agreement, including us becoming current in our periodic
reporting requirements and trading our common stock on the Over-The-Counter
Bulletin Board. We claim an exemption from registration afforded by
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, for the above issuance, since the
issuance did not involve a public offering, the recipient took the securities
for investment and not resale and the Company took appropriate measures to
restrict transfer. No underwriters or agents were involved in the issuance and
no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid by the Company.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item
5. Other Information.
None.
Item
6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
of Exhibit
|
|
|
3.1(t)
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation increasing the authorized shares
of common stock to 300,000,000 shares
|
|
|
3.2(13)
|
Series
A Preferred Stock Designation
|
|
|
10.1(1)
|
Sale
and Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2006, by and between
Sterling Grant Capital Inc. and Texhoma Energy, Inc.
|
|
|
10.2(1)
|
Letter
Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2005 by and between Pacific Spinner
Limited and Texhoma Energy, Inc.
|
|
|
10.3(2)
|
Sales
and Purchase Agreement with Structured Capital Corp.
|
|
|
10.4(2)
|
Sales
& Purchase Agreement with Kilrush Petroleum
|
|
|
10.5(2)
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement
|
|
|
10.6(2)
|
Secured
Term Note
|
|
|
10.7(2)
|
Warrant
Agreement (Texaurus)
|
|
|
10.8(2)
|
Warrant
Agreement (Texhoma)
|
|
|
10.9(2)
|
Registration
Rights Agreement
|
|
|
10.10(2)
|
Stock
Pledge Agreement
|
|
|
10.11(2)
|
Side
Letter Agreement
|
|
|
10.12(2)
|
Guaranty
of Texaurus
|
|
|
10.13(2)
|
Personal
Guaranty of Frank Jacobs
|
|
|
10.14(2)
|
Warrant
with Energy Capital Solutions, LLC
|
|
|
10.15(2)
|
Frank
Jacobs Subscription Agreement
|
|
|
10.16(5)
|
Sales
and Purchase Agreement with Structured Capital Corp.
|
10.17(6)
|
First
Amendment to Sales and Purchase Agreement
|
|
|
|
10.18(6)
|
Mortgage,
Security Agreement, Finance Statement and Assignment of
Production
|
|
|
|
|
10.19(6)
|
Collateral
Assignment
|
|
|
|
|
10.16(7)
|
Debt
Conversion Agreement with Lucayan Oil and Gas Investments,
Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
10.17(7)
|
Note
with Lucayan Oil and Gas Investments, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
10.18(8)
|
Promissory
Note to Frank Jacobs
|
|
|
|
|
10.19(8)
|
Security
Agreement with Frank Jacobs
|
|
|
|
|
10.20(10)
|
Letter
Agreement with Matrixx Resource Holdings Inc. regarding the sale of the
Clovelly Prospect
|
|
|
|
|
10.21(11)
|
Agreement
Regarding Frank A. Jacobs’ Note
|
|
|
|
|
10.22(11)
|
Joint
Venture Relationship Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
10.23(11)
|
Management
Services Agreement with Valeska and Amendment thereto
|
|
|
|
|
10.24(12)
|
Jacobs
Oil & Gas Limited Promissory Note
|
|
|
|
|
10.25(13)
|
Voting
Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
10.26(13)
|
Voting
Agreement with LOGI
|
|
|
|
|
10.27(13)
|
First
Amendment to Voting Agreement with LOGI
|
|
|
|
|
10.28(13)
|
Cooperation
Agreement and Mutual Release
|
|
|
|
10.28(13)
|
Consulting
Agreement with Ibrahim Nafi Onat
|
|
|
10.29(14)
|
Promissory
Note and Security Agreement with Polaris
|
|
|
10.30(16)
|
Second
Amendment to Management Services Agreement
|
|
|
10.31(17)
|
Option
Agreement
|
|
|
10.32(18)
|
Cooperation
Agreement and Mutual Release with Terje Reiersen
|
|
|
10.33(18)
|
First
Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement, Secured Term Note and
Registration Rights Agreement with Laurus
|
|
|
10.34(19)
|
Settlement
Agreement and Mutual Release
|
|
|
31.1*
|
Certificate
of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
32.1*
|
Certificate
of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
* Filed
herewith.
(t)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on September 22,
2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(1)
|
Filed
as exhibits to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on
February 14, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(2)
|
Filed
as exhibits to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April
4, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(3)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filing, filed with the Commission on April
5, 2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(4)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 13, 2006,
and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(5)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on April 4, 2006,
and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(6)
|
Filed
as exhibits to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on April 26, 2006,
and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(7)
|
Filed
as exhibits to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on May 24, 2006,
and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(8)
|
Filed
as exhibits to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on February 13,
2007, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(9)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on June 21, 2007,
and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(10)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on May 25, 2007,
and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(11)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on June 8, 2007,
and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(12)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on October 20,
2006, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(13)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on July 30, 2007,
and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(14)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on June 13, 2007,
and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(15)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on May 17, 2004,
and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(16)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 10-KSB, filed with the Commission on August 21,
2007, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(17)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 10-QSB, filed with the Commission on September
11, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
(18)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Form 10-KSB, filed with the Commission on November 9,
2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
(19)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to our Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on
December 12, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
TEXHOMA
ENERGY, INC.
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel
Vesco
|
|
Daniel
Vesco
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
Date:
May 15, 2008
|
In
accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURE
|
TITLE
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel
Vesco
|
|
|
Daniel
Vesco
|
Chief
Executive Officer,
|
May
15, 2008
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer,
|
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer) and
|
|
|
Director
|
|
Texhoma Energy (CE) (USOTC:TXHE)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Mai 2024 até Jun 2024
Texhoma Energy (CE) (USOTC:TXHE)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jun 2023 até Jun 2024