Filed
Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration
No. 333-196334
Dated
October 14, 2016
VYCOR
MEDICAL, INC.
3,991,202
Shares of Common Stock Par Value $0.0001 Per Share
This
prospectus relates to the offering by the selling stockholders of
VYCOR MEDICAL
, INC. of up to 3,991,202 shares of our
common stock underlying Series A and Series B warrants, par value $0.0001 per share. We will not receive any proceeds from the
sale of common stock.
The
selling stockholders have advised us that they will sell the shares of common stock from time to time in broker’s transactions,
in the open market, on the OTCQB, in privately negotiated transactions or a combination of these methods, at market prices prevailing
at the time of sale, at prices related to the prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices. We will pay the expenses incurred
to register the shares for resale, but the selling stockholders will pay any underwriting discounts, commissions or agent’s
commissions related to the sale of their shares of common stock.
Our
common stock is traded on the OTCQB under the symbol “VYCO”. On September 29, 2016, the closing sale price of our
common stock was $0.35 per share.
You
should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement or amendment. We have not authorized
anyone to provide you with different information.
Investing
in these securities involves significant risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 5
Neither
the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the securities or passed
upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The
date of this prospectus is October 14, 2016.
The
information contained in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. This prospectus is included in the registration statement
that was filed by VYCOR MEDICAL, INC. with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The selling stockholders may not sell these
securities until the registration statement becomes effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it
is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY
INFORMATION AND RISK FACTORS
The
items in the following summary are described in more detail later in this prospectus. This summary provides an overview of selected
information and does not contain all the information you should consider before investing in the securities. Before making an
investment decision, you should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the “Risk Factors” section, the financial
statements, and the notes to the financial statements.
For
purposes of this prospectus, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references herein to “Vycor”,
“the Company”, “we,” “us,” and “our,” refer to VYCOR MEDICAL, INC., a Delaware
corporation.
SUMMARY
OF THE COMPANY
This
summary provides an overview of selected information and does not contain all the information on the Company you should consider.
Therefore, this should be read in conjunction with the more detailed information set out in this prospectus, the business and
other information provided in the SEC filings included as Exhibits, and matters set forth under “Risk Factors.”
Business
Overview
The
Company was formed as a limited liability company under the laws of the State of New York on June 17, 2005 as “Vycor Medical
LLC”. On August 14, 2007, we converted into a Delaware corporation and changed our name to “Vycor Medical, Inc.”.
The Company’s listing went effective on February 2009 and on November 29, 2010 Vycor completed the acquisition of substantially
all of the assets of NovaVision, Inc. (“NovaVision”) and on January 4, 2012 Vycor, through its wholly-owned NovaVision
subsidiary, completed the acquisition of all the shares of Sight Science Limited (“Sight Science”), a previous competitor
to NovaVision.
Vycor
is dedicated to providing the medical community with innovative and superior surgical and therapeutic solutions and operates two
distinct business units within the medical device industry. Vycor Medical designs, develops and markets medical devices for use
in neurosurgery. NovaVision provides non-invasive rehabilitation therapies for those who have vision disorders resulting from
neurological brain damage such as that caused by a stroke. Both businesses adopt a minimally or non-invasive approach. Both technologies
have strong sales growth potential, address large potential markets and have the requisite regulatory approvals. The Company has
57 issued or allowed patents and a further 13 pending. The Company leverages joint resources across the divisions to operate in
a cost-efficient manner.
The
Company periodically engages in discussions with potential strategic partners for or purchasers of each or both of our operating
divisions.
Vycor
Medical
Vycor
Medical designs, develops and markets medical devices for use in neurosurgery. Vycor Medical’s ViewSite Brain Access System
(“VBAS”) is a next generation retraction and access system that was fully commercialized in early 2010 and is the
first significant technological change to brain tissue retraction in over 50 years in contrast to significant development in most
other neuro-surgical technologies. Vycor Medical is ISO 13485:2003 compliant, and VBAS has U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance and CE Marking
for Europe (Class III) for brain and spine surgeries, and regulatory approvals in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Korea, Japan,
Russia and Taiwan.
We
believe VBAS offers several advantages over other brain retractor systems, commonly known as ribbon or blade retractors that are
metallic, including having the potential to significantly reduce brain tissue trauma that arises from excessive pressure at the
edges of the blade. The design of VBAS can minimize the size of the brain entry access necessary for surgical procedures, and
is believed to significantly reduce the pressure and hence trauma on the surrounding brain tissue.
NovaVision
NovaVision
provides non-invasive, computer-based rehabilitation targeted at a substantial and largely un-addressed market of people who have
lost their sight as a result of stroke or other brain injury. NovaVision addresses a significant target market, estimated at approximately
$2 billion in each of the U.S. and the EU and over $13 billion globally.
NovaVision
has a family of therapies that both restore and compensate for lost vision:
●
|
Restoration
of vision: NovaVision’s VRT and Sight Science’s Neuro-Eye Therapy (NeET), aim to improve visual sensitivity in
a person’s blind area. VRT delivers a series of light stimuli along the border of the patient’s visual field loss.
These programmed light sequences stimulate the border zone between the “seeing” and “blind” visual
fields, repetitively challenging the visual cortex in the border zone with a large number of stimuli over the course of time.
NeET targets deep within the blind area by repeated stimulation, allowing patients to detect objects within the blind field.
|
|
|
●
|
Compensation
and re-training: Normal eye movements are also affected after brain injury adding to the problems of blindness. NeuroEyeCoach
provides a complementary therapy to VRT and NeET, which re-trains a patient to move their eyes, re-integrate left and right
vision and to make the most of their remaining visual field.
|
VRT
and NeuroEyeCoach are therefore highly complementary and are provided in an Internet-delivered suite to ensure broad benefits
to NovaVision’s patients.
NovaVision
also has models of VRT and NeuroEyeCoach for physicians and rehabilitation clinics, as well as VIDIT, a diagnostic program that
enables therapists to perform high-resolution visual field tests in less than ten minutes.
NovaVision’s
VRT is the only medical device aimed at the restoration of vision lost as a result of neurological damage which has FDA 510(k)
clearance to be marketed in the U.S; and NeuroEyeCoach is registered in the US as a Class I 510(k) exempt device. VRT, NEC and
NeET have CE Marking for the EU. NovaVision has 41 granted and 2 pending patents worldwide.
Competition
The
VBAS device is both a brain access system and a retractor and is therefore unique with no direct competitors. Competitive manufacturers
of brain retractors include Cardinal Health (V. Mueller line), Aesculap, Integra Life Science and Codman (Division of Johnson
& Johnson). Nico Corporation has a brain access device specifically designed to work with its Myriad resection and suction
product.
NovaVision
provides restoration therapies (VRT and NeET) and compensation or saccadic therapies (NeuroEyeCoach) for those suffering vision
loss as a result of neurological trauma. The other therapy type for this condition is substitution (optical aids such as prisms)
and is not considered by NovaVision as competition.
In
restoration, competition has been reduced through NovaVision’s acquisition of Sight Science and there are a few very small
companies or entities offering some form of vision rehabilitation product in Germany. Within compensation there are no real direct
competitors. Other companies in the general rehabilitation space include RevitalVision, PositScience and Dynavision. In the professional
market, NovaVision competes with aggregator products or those that provide a range of non-specific therapies, such a Rehacom,
Sanet Vision Integrator and Bioness BITS. NovaVision’s products are dedicated to vision.
The
Market For the Company’s Products And Therapies
VBAS
is used for craniotomy procedures. Based on statistics from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), management
estimates 700,000 such procedures are performed in the US annually. Of this, management believe approximately 225,000 (32 percent)
are addressable by the VBAS range currently, with another 100,000 (total of 325,000 or 46 percent) addressable by an expanded
future range. Management estimates, for the global market, there exists a current addressable market of approximately 1,100,000
procedures with another 500,000 addressable by an expanded VBAS range.
The
market for NovaVision’s therapies comprises those suffering from vision loss resulting from neurological trauma such as
stroke or other brain injury. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) estimates there are approximately 8 million Americans
who have previously had a stroke incident, with 795,000 additional strokes occurring annually; adjusting for repeat strokes and
deaths, there are 481,000 new stroke survivors each year. Additionally, approximately 5.3 million Americans live with the long-term
effects of a TBI, with 275,000 hospitalizations each year. The most recent scientific research estimates that approximately 28.5%
experience some visual impediment and 20.5% of these patients experience a permanent visual field deficit, reducing mobility and
other activities of daily living. The target market for VRT and NeET is this 20.5% subset of patients who have suffered a permanent
visual field deficit; NeuroEyeCoach addresses all 28.5% of patients who experience visual impediments. Management estimates that
the addressable target market for its therapies is approximately 2.9 million people in the US, approximately 2.8 million people
in Europe and approximately 12.9 million people throughout the rest of the world.
Our
Growth Strategy
Vycor
Medical
Vycor
Medical’s growth strategy includes:
1.
Increasing U.S. market penetration through broader hospital coverage and targeted direct physician marketing. Vycor Medical’s
sales and marketing strategy is to penetrate a well-defined target market of 4,500 neurosurgeons. Vycor markets direct to surgeons
as well as marketing and distributing through independent distributors, with a focus both on adding new hospitals and expanding
to additional surgeons in hospitals where VBAS is already approved, and to expand usage to a broader range of procedures. In order
to expand its direct marketing and deepening its penetration, Vycor is exploring the creation of a Centers of Excellence medical
education campaign and to that end will be finalizing new surgeon education and training materials including detailed videos produced
with surgeons at Weill Cornell. Vycor is pursuing a policy of continually evaluating and upgrading its distributors as well as
adding additional distributors in regions where it has little to no presence.
2.
Provision of more Clinical and Scientific Data supporting the products superiority over the current standard-of-care blade retractors
and to demonstrate VBAS’ potential for cost savings. Clinical and scientific data (in the form of peer reviewed articles,
clinical studies and other reports and case studies) are critical in driving adoption, and in turn revenues, further and faster
by demonstrating VBAS’ superiority as a minimally invasive access system which helps VBAS move further up the hospital cost/benefit
curve. To date the Company has already had 10 Peer Reviewed studies and 4 other clinical papers and anticipates further studies
to be published.
3.
International Market Growth
Vycor
Medical utilizes select medical device distributors with experience in neurosurgical devices in their countries or regions. VBAS
has full regulatory approvals in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Europe (EU – Class III), Korea, Japan and Taiwan and
is seeking or has partial regulatory approvals in India, Russia and Vietnam. Vycor Medical is actively pursuing new distribution
agreements in the countries where it does not have any in place.
4.
New Product Development
New
Product Development is targeted at both driving the use of its existing VBAS product range through ancillary products and modalities
that will facilitate the product’s use and through new product extensions to broaden VBAS applicability to procedures currently
not addressed by the existing product line.
Vycor
is modifying its existing VBAS product suite to make it more easy to integrate with Image Guidance Systems (IGS) by re-engineering
VBAS so that the entire range of 12 devices, excluding the VBASmini, will be able to more easily accommodate pointers from all
the main IGS manufacturers. Increasingly, all major neuro centers have image guidance systems, and where this is in place over
90% of surgeries are carried out using IGS and management strongly believes that the existing VBAS rigid structure lends itself
well to being incorporated into this increasing trend.
NovaVision
While
speech, physical, and occupational therapies are the long-standing treatment standards for stroke and TBI survivors, VRT is the
first and only FDA-cleared clinical component of vision restoration to physically enhance the visual field after a stroke or brain
injury. Increasingly the healthcare community, partly driven by strong lobbying by stroke associations worldwide, are recognizing
that vision is not only a significant issue post stroke or brain injury, but that visual field loss can have a significant impact
on the success of other rehabilitation modalities and the quality of life.
Our
strategic vision for NovaVision has been to develop and provide a clinically supported, affordable and scalable visual therapy
solution offering that provides broad benefits to those suffering visual impairment following neurological brain damage; and to
offer solutions for both patients and physicians alike. Following a prolonged development program, aimed at broadening patient
benefits, significantly reducing cost and making our therapies affordable and scalable, NovaVision was able to launch its Internet-delivered
therapy suite in the US in June 2015 and in Europe in December 2015.
NovaVision
has four routes-to-market aimed at patients and professionals, comprising: direct-to-patient; rehabilitation centers and clinics;
stroke associations and support groups; and physicians. Given the company’s limited resources NovaVision is initially focusing
on direct-to-patient, with a website lead-driven inbound and outbound marketing strategy targeted at prospective patients and
relatives. Website metrics – particularly for the US and more recently Germany – are strong, showing good growth in
traffic and rankings, and have been effective in generating leads. Our analysis of the campaign metrics in the US (including Google
Ads) over the last 6 months have highlighted some key improvements that needed to be implemented which we are carrying out and
which we believe could have a material impact on our lead generation.
Following
the pilot launch of our NovaVision Center Model, comprising a vision diagnostics program and the NeuroEyeCoach training program,
we are substantially broadening the delivery and licensing model in response to feedback from clinics. The new Center Model will
have a complete suite for the professional market, including options for software download, CD Rom, Cloud based and Hardware delivery
with flexible and cost-effective pricing options, and will be offered in both the US and Europe.
Manufacturing
Vycor
Medical uses a sub-contract manufacturer to manufacture, package, label and sterilize its VBAS products. The Company is in the
process of migrating all its VBAS manufacturing to Life Science Outsourcing, Inc. in Brea, California that is FDA-registered and
meets ISO standards and certifications.
Intellectual
Property
Patents
Vycor
Medical maintains a portfolio of patent protection on its methods and apparatus for its Brain and Spine products and technology
in the form of issued patents and applications, both domestically and internationally, with a total of 16 granted/allowed and
11 pending patents.
NovaVision
maintains a portfolio of patent protection on its methods and apparatus in the form of issued patents and applications, both domestically
and internationally, with a total of 41 granted and 2 pending patents (including Sight Science).
NovaVision’s
VRT is the only medical device aimed at the restoration of vision lost as a result of neurological damage which has FDA 510(k)
clearance to be marketed in the U.S; and NeuroEyeCoach is registered in the US as a Class I 510(k) exempt device.
Trademarks
VYCOR
MEDICAL
is a registered trademark and
VIEWSITE
is a common law trademark.
NovaVision
maintains a portfolio of registered trademarks for
NOVAVISION, NOVAVISION VRT
,
VRT VISION RESTORATION THERAPY
and
NEUROEYECOACH, amongst others, along with relevant logos, both in the US and internationally.
Employees
We
currently have 12 employees.
Websites
The
Company operates websites at www.vycormedical.com, www.novavision.com,www.novavisionvrt.com, www.neuroeyecoach.com and www.sightscience.com.
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
prospectus contains forward-looking statements. This prospectus includes statements regarding our plans, goals, strategies, intent,
beliefs or current expectations. These statements are expressed in good faith and based upon a reasonable basis when made, but
there can be no assurance that these expectations will be achieved or accomplished. These forward looking statements can be identified
by the use of terms and phrases such as “believe,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,”
“target,” “estimate,” “expect,” and the like, and/or future-tense or conditional constructions
“may,” “could,” “should,” etc. Items contemplating or making assumptions about, actual or
potential future sales, market size, collaborations, and business opportunities also constitute such forward-looking statements.
Although
forward-looking statements in this report reflect the good faith judgment of our management, forward-looking statements are inherently
subject to known and unknown risks, business, economic and other risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to be materially
different from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Readers are urged not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update any forward- looking statements
in order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this report, other than as may be required by applicable
law or regulation. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in our reports filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect
our business, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize,
or if the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those expected or projected.
CORPORATE
ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER
The
Company maintains its designated office at 6401 Congress Ave., Suite 140, Boca Raton, FL 33487. The Company’s telephone
number is 561-558-2020.
THE
OFFERING
This
prospectus will be utilized in connection with the re-sale of 3,991,202 shares which could be potentially issued in the future
as of the result of the sale of common stock and the prospective exercise of certain investor warrants and placement agent warrants
which were issued in connection with the Company’s recent stock offering. The Company will not receive any proceeds from
any sales of these shares.
Common
stock currently outstanding
|
11,116,077
shares
(1)
|
|
|
Common
stock offered by the selling stockholders
|
3,991,202
shares
|
(1)
Shares of common stock outstanding as of September 29, 2016.
Use
of proceeds
|
We
will not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock offered by this prospectus.
|
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The
following selected consolidated statement of operations data contains consolidated statement of operations data and consolidated
balance sheet for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The consolidated statement
of operations data and balance sheet data were derived from the audited consolidated financial statements. All share amounts are
restated to reflect a one-for-150 reverse stock split which became effective January 15, 2013. Such financial data should be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to the consolidated financial statements and with “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
|
|
12/31/2015
|
|
|
12/31/2014
|
|
|
12/31/2013
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,138,634
|
|
|
$
|
1,250,292
|
|
|
$
|
1,089,374
|
|
Net comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(2,315,379
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,162,031
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,410,116
|
)
|
Net comprehensive loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
Weighted average no. shares
|
|
|
10,839,335
|
|
|
|
10,270,657
|
|
|
|
6,324,175
|
|
Stockholders’
equity (deficit)
|
|
$
|
1,145,722
|
|
|
$
|
2,888,902
|
|
|
$
|
(3,315,243
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,022,731
|
|
|
$
|
3,813,743
|
|
|
$
|
2,115,250
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
877,009
|
|
|
$
|
924,841
|
|
|
$
|
5,430,492
|
|
The
following selected data contains statement of operations data and balance sheet for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and June
30, 2015. The statement of operations data and balance sheet data were derived from the financial statements for the periods.
Such financial data should be read in conjunction with the unaudited financial statements and the notes to the financial statements
for said periods and with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
|
|
As
of
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
As
of
June 30, 2015
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
1,682,239
|
|
|
$
|
2,755,089
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,024,412
|
|
|
$
|
791,597
|
|
Total Stockholders’
Equity
|
|
$
|
657,827
|
|
|
$
|
1,963,492
|
|
Statement of Operations
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
379,406
|
|
|
$
|
286,018
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
$
|
622,822
|
|
|
$
|
710,130
|
|
Net Comprehensive Loss
|
|
$
|
(302,442
|
)
|
|
$
|
(401,191
|
)
|
Basis and Diluted Loss
Per Share
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
11,007,522
|
|
|
|
10,819,691
|
|
RISK
FACTORS
Investing
in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as the financial
and other information in this Prospectus, before deciding to invest in our securities. If any of the following risks actually
occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the
value of our securities could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment in our securities.
Risks
Related to Our Financials
We
do not have a significant operating history and have not achieved profitable operations. If we are unable to achieve profitable
operations, you may lose your entire investment.
Our
independent auditors, Paritz & Co., P.A., certified public accountants, have expressed substantial doubt concerning our ability
to continue as a going concern. We have incurred losses since our inception, including a net loss of $2,250,420 for the year ended
December 31, 2015 and of $832,923 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, and we expect to incur additional losses in the future.
We have incurred negative cash flows from operations since inception. As of June 30, 2016 the Company had a stockholders’
equity of $657,827 and cash and cash equivalents of $87,709. Since we have no record of profitable operations, there is high a
possibility that you may suffer a complete loss of your investment.
The
absence of significant operating history for us makes forecasting our revenue and expenses difficult, and we may be unable to
adjust our spending in a timely manner to compensate for unexpected revenue shortfalls or unexpected expenses.
As
a result of the absence of profitable operating history for us, it is difficult to accurately forecast our future revenue. In
addition, we have limited meaningful historical financial data upon which to base planned operating expenses. Current and future
expense levels are based on our operating plans and estimates of future revenue. Revenue and operating results are difficult to
forecast because they generally depend on our ability to promote and sell our products and revenues can fluctuate due the timing
impact of larger orders. As a result, we may be unable to adjust our spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected
revenue shortfall, which would result in further losses. We may also be unable to expand our operations in a timely manner to
adequately meet demand to the extent it exceeds expectations.
Our
limited operating history does not afford investors a sufficient history on which to base an investment decision.
We
were formed on June 17, 2005. Vycor Medical’s products were only fully launched at the beginning of 2010 and NovaVision’s
therapies were re-launched following re-development in June 2015 in the US and December 2015 in Europe.W e are therefore currently
in the relatively early stages of marketing our products and therapies. There can be no assurance at this time that we will ever
operate profitably or that we will have adequate working capital to meet our obligations as they become due. Investors must consider
the risks and difficulties frequently encountered by early stage companies, particularly in rapidly evolving markets. Such risks
include the following:
●
|
competition;
|
|
|
●
|
need
for acceptance of products and therapies — there can be no assured market for our products and therapies and there is
no guarantee of orders or of surgeon, physician or patient acceptance;
|
|
|
●
|
ability
to continue to develop and extend brand identity;
|
|
|
●
|
ability
to anticipate and adapt to a competitive market;
|
|
|
●
|
ability
to effectively manage rapidly expanding operations;
|
|
|
●
|
amount
and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to expansion of our business, operations, and infrastructure;
and
|
|
|
●
|
dependence
upon key personnel to market and sell our products and the loss of one of our key managers may adversely affect the marketing
of our products.
|
We
cannot be certain that our business strategy will be successful or that we will successfully address these risks. In the event
that we do not successfully address these risks, our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations could
be materially and adversely affected.
Our
revenue is dependent upon acceptance of our products and therapies by the market. The failure of such acceptance will cause us
to curtail or cease operations.
Our
revenue comes from the sale of our products and therapies. As a result, we will continue to incur operating losses until such
time as sales of our products and therapies reach a mature level and we are able to generate sufficient revenue from the sale
of our products and therapies to meet our operating expenses. There can be no assurance that customers will adopt our technology
and products, or that businesses and prospective customers will agree to pay for our products and therapies. In the event that
we are not able to significantly increase the number of customers that purchase our products and therapies, or if we are unable
to charge the necessary prices, our financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected.
We
will need to raise additional funds to continue bring products to market and operate.
Our
current funds are only sufficient to allow us to operate for a limited period of time. We will require additional funds in order
to continue our operations after we exhaust our available funding. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 the aggregate of cash
used in operating activities was $382,882, or an average monthly “burn rate” of approximately $64,000. The cash and
cash equivalent balance of $87,709 at June 30, 2016 is therefore equivalent to a little more than one month of “burn rate”.
This does not take into account any future sales growth and/or future cost cutting. There have been no significant changes in
the operations of the Company since June 30, 2016 and none are anticipated in the next six months which would have a significant
impact on the “burn rate”. Beyond this period the Company believes it will not have enough cash to meet its various
cash needs unless the Company is able to obtain additional cash from the issuance of debt or equity securities. There is no assurance
that additional funds from the issuance of equity or debt will be available for the Company to finance its operations on acceptable
terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may have to further reduce costs (including marketing costs)
or consider ceasing some or all of its operations.
The
majority of the assets on our balance sheet comprise assets that are subject to annual accounting impairment review and therefore
may be subject to write-downs which will affect both the balance sheet and net profit or loss.
The
assets on our balance sheet include patents, software, and trademarks which are reviewed for impairment by the Company annually
in accordance with the authoritative guidance. Impairment is recognized when the estimated undiscounted cash flows associated
with the asset or group of assets is less than their carrying value. If impairment exists, an adjustment is made to write the
asset down to its fair value, and a loss is recorded as the difference between the carrying value and fair value. We will review
these assets as part of the preparation of the financial statements for 2016 and, if an impairment exists, would be required to
recognize an impairment to some or all of these assets which would increase the losses for the year and reduce the value of the
assets on the balance sheet.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
existing products and therapies may not gain sufficient acceptance in the marketplace, or may take longer to gain acceptance than
expected or may face regulatory delays.
Uncertainty
exists as to whether our products and therapies will be fully accepted by the market without additional clinical evaluations and
more widespread doctor acceptance, or that the time taken to gain regulatory approval or acceptance may be longer than expected.
A number of factors may limit the market acceptance of our products and therapies, including the availability of alternative products
and therapies and the price of our products and therapies relative to alternative products and therapies.
There
is a risk that development of finalization of development of new products takes longer than expected, or that longer than expected
regulatory processes in certain jurisdictions may slow the time period to full commercialization.
There
is a risk that surgeons will be encouraged to continue to use multiple-use devices, such as standard blade retractors, instead
of our single use devices, or alternative techniques or other tubular constructions or retractors. Our VBAS device is designed
to be used only once and then discarded. Vycor Medical’s competitors include multiple use devices such as metal blade retractors.
The multiple use devices are significantly less expensive on a per use basis than our single use devices. We are assuming that,
notwithstanding the difference in price, surgeons will elect to use our devices because of their perception that our devices will
permit safer and less invasive surgery. However, hospitals, medical insurance providers, health maintenance organizations and
others approving surgical costs may decide that the cost outweighs the benefit. In addition, surgeons may opt to use other devices.
While Vycor Medical intends to continue to build clinical and other scientific data demonstrating the cost benefit of VBAS over
other methodologies, this data may not be conclusive or may be viewed as insufficient by hospitals or physicians.
In
the US, NovaVision’s therapies require physician prescriptions, and physicians may not be persuaded by the effectiveness
of our therapies to prescribe them to their patients, given the price compared to the physician perception of the therapy benefit.
Whilst NovaVision intends to continue to implement strategies to increase awareness of its therapies, and their benefits, and
has significantly reduced their cost to patients through its development program, there is no assurance that this strategy will
be successful, particularly in that the target audience (for both physicians and patients) is very large and diverse and the patient
audience tends to be both medically and financially challenged, requiring multiple methods and routes to access it. In the majority
of cases there is no insurance reimbursement for NovaVision’s therapies, so patients are required to pay themselves.
The
marketing expenditures required to achieve the level of awareness domestically and internationally may also be too high. NovaVision’s
VRT therapy usually takes 6 months to complete, requiring patients to carry out the therapy twice a day (for an hour total), 6
days a week. Patients have to be persuaded that this level of intense therapy is justified for the anticipated benefit, but there
is no assurance that sufficient numbers of patients will be convinced to enable a successful market to develop for the therapy.
Some
of our competitors are more established and better capitalized than we are and we may be unable to establish market share.
Some
of our competitors are well-known, more established and better capitalized than we are. As such, they may have at their disposal
greater marketing strength and economies of scale and, as they may have additional products which they sell to the same customers,
have greater presence with these customer. They may also have more resources to expend on research and development to create more
innovative products in competition with ours. Competition will also likely increase as or when the clinical and cost benefits
of the Company’s products and therapies are established and proven. Accordingly, we may not be successful in competing with
them for market share.
Sales
may not produce profits.
We
may be forced to sell our products and therapies at a lower price than anticipated due to a variety of reasons, including without
limitation selling prices of comparable products by our competitors and budget or financial constraints of our customers. Further,
we may sell fewer products or therapies than anticipated, and the costs associated with each unit, including costs of manufacturing,
delivery and commissions, may be greater than anticipated. As a result, there is a risk that costs associated with the sales of
our products and therapies may be greater than we anticipated and that sales may fail to yield profitability.
International
sales of our VBAS product tend to vary from period-to-period and are less predictable than domestic sales.T his can cause a material
impact (either positive or negative) on VBAS revenues in a given quarter. Although international distributors generally commit
to purchases of minimum quantities of product and we work with them to increase sales in their markets, there is no assurance
that these minimums will be met, or that sales generated in a market in any one year might be repeated in subsequent years. In
addition, Vycor Medical’s realized sales price for international sales tends to be lower than in the US. This is because
Vycor Medical always partners with a distributor in international markets who will take on the marketing and distribution costs
in return for a lower sale price.I n addition, end market pricing in some international markets is lower than in the US. Notwithstanding,
international sales are a key component of Vycor Medical’s growth strategy and the profitability of these sales have yet
to be determined.T he Company may not be able to attract suitable distribution partners in all the markets it wishes to enter.
A
key component of NovaVision’s growth strategy has been the development of a lower cost delivery model which significantly
lowers the price of its therapy to patients. This has also resulted in significantly lower realized sales prices to on a per patient
basis. While management believes that cost to the patient is a key decision factor in utilizing the product, there is no assurance
that lowered cost will automatically lead to more widespread product adoption.
We
might incur substantial expense to develop products that, once commercialized, are never sufficiently successful.
Our
growth strategy requires the successful development and launch of new or updated products for Vycor Medical and new or updated
therapies for NovaVision. Although management will take every precaution to ensure that such expenditure is only on new or updated
products and therapies with a high likelihood of achieving commercial success, there can be no assurance that this will be the
case. The causes for failure of new or updated products and therapies once commercialized are numerous, including:
●
|
market
demand for the product or therapy proves to be smaller than market research suggested;
|
|
|
●
|
competitive
products or therapies with superior performance either on the market or commercialized at the same time or soon after;
|
|
|
●
|
product
or therapy development turns out to be more costly than anticipated or takes longer;
|
|
|
●
|
product
or therapy requires significant adjustment post commercialization, rendering the project uneconomic or extending considerably
the likely investment return period;
|
|
|
●
|
additional
regulatory requirements which extend the time to launch and increase the overall costs of the development;
|
|
|
●
|
patent
conflicts or unenforceable intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
●
|
neurosurgeons
and other physicians may be unwilling to adapt to new products and therapies, which will slow new product adoption;
|
|
|
●
|
new
products and therapies may be dependent, to a greater or lesser extent, on the successful outcomes of clinical studies. These
may cost more, take longer to complete, the outcomes maybe inconclusive, and it may be difficult to achieve publication in
an important journal; and
|
|
|
●
|
other
factors that could make the product uneconomical.
|
We
might incur substantial expense to develop products that are never successfully developed and commercialized.
We
have incurred and may continue to incur research and development and other expenses in developing new medical devices and therapies.
The potential products and therapies to which we devote resources might never be successfully developed or fully commercialized
by us for numerous reasons, including:
●
|
inability
to develop products and therapies that address our customers’ needs;
|
|
|
●
|
competitive
products with superior performance;
|
|
|
●
|
additional
regulatory requirements which render the development uneconomic or prevent our ability to gain regulatory approval;
|
|
|
●
|
patent
conflicts or unenforceable intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
●
|
demand
for the particular product; and
|
|
|
●
|
other
factors that could make the product uneconomical.
|
Incurring
significant expenses for a potential product or therapy that is not successfully developed and/or commercialized could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, prospects and share price.
We
may not be successful in entering into strategic relationships.
One
of the principal elements of our strategy has been to develop the business to the point where they would be attractive for strategic
partnerships with other entities or potential acquirers of either or both of our operating divisions. We may or may not be able
to find suitable partners for or acquirers of either or both of our operating division, or may not be able to enter into transactions
that are on terms which are beneficial to the Company.
We
cannot be certain that we will obtain and be able to maintain patents for our devices and technology or that such patents will
protect us from competitors.
We
believe that our success and competitive position will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patents for our devices,
which is both costly and time consuming. We have 57 issued patents covering both NovaVision, Sight Science and Vycor Medical.
We still are in the process of prosecuting 13 others. Patent Offices typically requires 12-24 months or more to process a patent
application. There can be no assurance that the remainder of our patent applications will be approved. However we have not waited
for the approval of all the patent applications before launching sales of our devices and therapies. There can be no assurance
regarding how long it will take the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to decide whether to approve our patent applications or how
long it will take foreign patent offices to grant us patents. There can be no assurance that any patent issued or licensed to
us will provide us with protection against competitive products and therapies or otherwise protect our commercial viability, or
that challenges will not be instituted against the validity or enforceability of any of our patents or, if instituted, that such
challenges will not be successful. The cost of litigation to uphold the validity of a patent and enforce it against infringement
can be substantial and we do not have patent insurance. Even issued patents may later be modified or revoked by the Patent and
Trademark Office or in legal proceedings. Patent applications in the United States are maintained in secrecy until the patent
issues and, since publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature tends to lag behind actual discoveries, we
cannot be certain that we were the first creator of the inventions covered by our pending patent applications or the first to
file patent applications on such inventions.
We
are in the process of finalizing a manufacturing migration for VBAS that could result in unexpected expenses or inventory shortages.
We
are in the process of finalizing a two-year manufacturing migration project for VBAS which will result in all the units being
manufactured by Accent and then packaged and completed by LSO, these suppliers being located close to each other in California.
The process of finalization could result in unexpected additional expenses and could also result in inventory shortages for certain
models if not completed to plan.
Vycor
Medical will be dependent on two key vendors to manufacture our products, once this migration is complete.
Vycor
Medical is dependent on Life Science Outsourcing, Inc. (“LSO”) and Accent Plastics Limited (“Accent”)
to provide engineering, contract manufacturing and logistical support to manufacture our products. We are dependent upon their
manufacture of our products in accordance with our specifications and delivering them on a timely basis.
If
either supplier fails to manufacture and/or deliver our products as specified, or decides to no longer manufacture for the Company,
we may need to locate another manufacturer. We can offer no assurances that we will be successful in finding an alternate manufacturer
and negotiating acceptable terms with them on a timely basis without impact on our manufacturing and delivery schedule.
Both
manufacturers are subject to regulatory requirements and certifications. Loss of such certification would affect our ability to
deliver products.
Vycor
Medical’s relatively low volumes limit the ability to lower manufacturing costs.
Although
the gross margins for Vycor Medical’s products are acceptable, manufacturing costs are volume-dependent. As the VBAS range
comprises 14 different sizes, costs will only reduce further once volumes for each of the 14 sizes increase.
We
will need additional distribution and marketing partners to help us market our products.
At
this time, we have a small number of sales and marketing personnel and limited distribution and marketing channels that we will
need to expand in the future. Vycor Medical has contracted with independent medical device distributors and representatives that
collectively have field salespeople who call on neurosurgery departments both in the US and internationally. To implement our
growth plan we need to expand the US and international scope of our sales and distribution. Given the relatively small size of
our company and the fact that our products and therapies are new with currently limited sales, there is no assurance that we will
be able to attract successful distributors to contract with us. There is also no assurance that the contracted distributors or
potential new distributors will be successful in promoting and selling our products and therapies.
In
addition, monitoring international distributors and interfacing with potential international customers and other partners is made
harder given the size of our company.
We
will need to increase the size of our organization, and may experience difficulties in managing growth.
We
are a small company with minimal employees. Future growth will impose significant added responsibilities on employees and members
of management, including the need to identify, recruit, maintain and integrate new managers and employees. Our future financial
performance and its ability to compete effectively will depend, in part, on its ability to manage any future growth effectively.
The
loss of our key personnel could adversely affect our business. We may not be able to hire and retain qualified personnel to support
our growth and if we are unable to retain or hire such personnel in the future, our ability to improve our products and implement
our business objectives could be adversely affected.
Our
success depends to a significant extent upon the efforts of our senior management team and other key personnel. The loss of the
services of such personnel could adversely affect our business and our ability to implement our growth plan.W e cannot assure
you that the services of the members of our management team will continue to be available to us, or that we will be able to find
a suitable replacement for any of them. We do not have key man insurance on any members of our management team. If any member
of our management team were to become incapacitated or die and we are unable to replace them for a prolonged period of time, we
may be unable to carry out our long term business plan and our future prospect for growth, and our business, may be harmed.
Also,
because of the nature of our business, our success is dependent upon our ability to attract, train, manage and retain sales, marketing
and other qualified personnel.T here is substantial competition for qualified personnel, and an inability to recruit or retain
qualified personnel may impact our ability to implement our strategy to grow our business and compete effectively in our industry.
Even
though our current products and therapies are approved by regulatory authorities, if we or our suppliers fail to comply with ongoing
regulatory requirements, or if we experience unanticipated problems with our products or therapies, these products or therapies
could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market.
Any
product or therapy which we obtain marketing approval, along with the manufacturing processes, post-approval clinical data and
promotional activities for such product or therapy, will be subject to continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA and
other regulatory bodies. In particular we and our suppliers are required to comply with the Quality System Regulation, or QSR,
for the manufacture of our products and delivery of our therapies which cover the methods and documentation of the design, testing,
production, control, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, storage and shipping of any product or therapy for which we obtain
marketing approval. The FDA enforces the GMP and QSR through unannounced inspections. We and our third party manufacturers and
suppliers will have to successfully complete such inspections. Failure by us or one of our suppliers, with statutes and regulations
administered by the FDA and other regulatory bodies, or failure to take adequate response to any observations, could result in,
among other things, any of the following enforcement actions:
●
|
warning
letters or untitled letters;
|
|
|
●
|
fines
and civil penalties;
|
|
|
●
|
unanticipated
expenditures;
|
|
|
●
|
withdrawal
or suspension of approval by the FDA or other regulatory bodies;
|
|
|
●
|
product
recall or seizure;
|
|
|
●
|
orders
for physician notification or device repair, replacement or refund;
|
|
|
●
|
interruption
of production;
|
|
|
●
|
operating
restrictions;
|
|
|
●
|
injunctions;
and
|
|
|
●
|
criminal
prosecution.
|
If
any of these actions were to occur it would harm our reputation and cause our product or therapy sales and profitability to suffer.
Furthermore, our key component suppliers may not currently be or may not continue to be in compliance with applicable regulatory
requirements.
If
the FDA determines that our promotional materials, training or other activities constitutes promotion of an unapproved use, it
could request that we cease or modify our training or promotional materials or subject us to regulatory enforcement actions. It
is also possible that other federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities might take action if they consider our training
or other promotional materials to constitute promotion of an unapproved use, which could result in significant fines or penalties
under other statutory authorities, such as laws prohibiting false claims for reimbursement.
Moreover,
any modification to a device that has received FDA approval that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that
would constitute a major change in its intended use, design or manufacture, requires a new approval from the FDA. If the FDA disagrees
with any determination by us that new approval is not required, we may be required to cease marketing or to recall the modified
product until we obtain approval. In addition, we could also be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties.
In
addition, we may be required to conduct costly post-market testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of our products,
and we will be required to report adverse events and malfunctions related to our products. Later discovery of previously unknown
problems with our products, including unanticipated adverse events or adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, manufacturing
problems, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements such as QSR or GMP, may result in restrictions on such products or
manufacturing processes, withdrawal of the products from the market, voluntary or mandatory recalls, fines, suspension of regulatory
approvals, product seizures, injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
Further,
healthcare laws and regulations may change significantly in the future. Any new healthcare laws or regulations may adversely affect
our business. A review of our business by courts or regulatory authorities may result in a determination that could adversely
affect our operations. Also, the healthcare regulatory environment may change in a way that restricts our operations.
In
Europe, the relevant European authorities could hold imports from us and remove CE marking for violating their rules and regulations.
We could get a warning from a European Competent Authority or its Notified Body and we would be obligated to fix the problem and
follow up with either the Notified Body or Competent Authorities.Similarly, in other international markets for which Vycor Medical’s
products currently have full or partial regulatory approval (Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, Korea and Russia), the relevant
regulatory body could place a hold on imports from us and could revoke any licenses held for violations of its rules and regulations.
The relevant regulatory body could issue a warning the first time around and we would be obligated to fix the problem and follow
up, or regulations could change invalidating our approvals.
Because
product liability is inherent in the medical devices industry and insurance is expensive and difficult to obtain, we may be exposed
to large lawsuits.
Our
business exposes us to potential product liability risks, which are inherent in the manufacturing, marketing and sale of medical
devices. While we will take precautions we deem to be appropriate to avoid product liability suits against us, there can be no
assurance that we will be able to avoid significant product liability exposure. Product liability insurance for the medical products
industry is generally expensive. While we have product liability coverage for our Vycor Medical devices, and product liability
and professional indemnity insurance for our NovaVision and Sight Science therapies, there can be no assurance that we will be
able to continue to obtain such coverage on acceptable terms, or that any insurance policy will provide adequate protection against
potential claims. A successful product liability claim brought against us may exceed any insurance coverage secured by us and
could have a material adverse effect on our results or ability to continue marketing our products.
The
other insurances we have are Directors and Officers Liability Insurance and certain commercial liability and personal property
insurances at present. We may have exposure in the event of loss or damage to our properties.
We
have not established any reserve funds for potential warranty claims. If we experience an increase in warranty claims or if our
repair and replacement costs associated with warranty claims increase significantly, it would have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.
Because
the healthcare industry is subject to changing policies and procedures, we may find it difficult to continue to compete in an
uncertain environment.
The
health care industry is subject to changing political, economic and regulatory influences that may affect the procurement practices
and operations of healthcare industry participants. During the past several years government regulation of the healthcare industry
has changed significantly in several countries. Healthcare industry participants may react to new policies by curtailing or deferring
use of new treatments for disease, including treatments that would use our devices. This could substantially impair our ability
to successfully marker our products, which would have a material adverse effect on our performance.
The
market success of our products and therapies may be dependent in part upon third-party reimbursement policies that are often subject
to change.
Our
ability to successfully penetrate the market for our products and therapies may to some extent depend on the availability of reimbursement
to individuals for rehabilitation therapies and to hospitals for neurosurgical procedures from third-party payers, such as governmental
programs, private insurance and private health plans. There is no guarantee that this will not change in the future or that applicable
levels of reimbursement to individuals and hospitals, if any, will be high enough to allow us to charge a reasonable profit margin.
Vycor Medical’s products are not specifically reimbursed by third party payers, they are part of the overall procedure cost
and therefore some hospitals may view this as an increase in cost. If levels of reimbursement are decreased in the future, the
demand for our products could diminish or our ability to sell our products on a profitable basis could be adversely affected.
NovaVision’s therapies are not generally reimbursed by third party payers, although this is sometimes available to patients
on a case-by-case basis.
We
may be affected by health care reform.
The
U.S. Government, various state governments and European and Asian governments may enact various types of health care reform in
order to control growing health care costs. We are presently uncertain as to the effects on our business of the certain legislation
which has been previously enacted and are unable to predict what legislative proposals will be adopted in the future, if any.
Risks
Related to Share Ownership
We
are subject to compliance with securities law, which exposes us to potential liabilities, including potential rescission rights.
We
have offered and sold our Common Stock to investors pursuant to certain exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act of 1933, as well as those of various state securities laws. The basis for relying on such exemptions is factual; that is,
the applicability of such exemptions depends upon our conduct and that of those persons contacting prospective investors and making
the offering. We have not received a legal opinion to the effect that any of our prior offerings were exempt from registration
under any federal or state law. Instead, we have relied upon the operative facts as the basis for such exemptions, including information
provided by investors themselves.
If
any prior offering did not qualify for such exemption, an investor would have the right to rescind its purchase of the securities
if it so desired. It is possible that if an investor should seek rescission, such investor would succeed. A similar situation
prevails under state law in those states where the securities may be offered without registration in reliance on the partial preemption
from the registration or qualification provisions of such state statutes under the National Securities Markets Improvement Act
of 1996. If investors were successful in seeking rescission, we would face severe financial demands that could adversely affect
our business and operations. Additionally, if we did not in fact qualify for the exemptions upon which it has relied, we may become
subject to significant fines and penalties imposed by the SEC and state securities agencies.
Fountainhead
Capital Management Limited (“Fountainhead”) is a substantial minority shareholder and their interests may differ from
other stockholders.
As
of September 29, 2016, Fountainhead (together with parties affiliated to Fountainhead) beneficially owned, in the aggregate, approximately
45.7% of our Voting Share Capital, including Common Stock and Preferred D Shares convertible into Common Stock. As a result, they
are holders of a substantial minority of the outstanding shares (prior to the Offering) and they may be able to influence the
outcome of stockholder votes on various matters, including the election of directors and extraordinary corporate transactions,
including business combinations. Their interests may differ from other stockholders.F ountainhead has committed to subscribe for
its pro-rata share of the Offering and, dependent on the take-up of the Offering by other shareholders, this may result in Fountainhead
and affiliated parties beneficially owning more than 50% of the Voting Share Capital.T wo of the Company’s members of management
and the board of directors (David Cantor and Peter C. Zachariou) serve as investment managers of Fountainhead and one of the Company’s
members of management and board of directors (Adrian Liddell) serves as an advisor to Fountainhead.
Our
share price could be volatile and our trading volume may fluctuate substantially.
The
price of our common shares has been and may in the future continue to be extremely volatile, with the sale price fluctuating from
a low of $0.20 to a high of $2.65 since September 1, 2014. Many factors could have a significant impact on the future price of
our common shares, including:
|
our
inability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, whether through the issuance of equity securities or debt;
|
|
our
failure to successfully implement our business objectives and strategic growth plans;
|
|
compliance
with ongoing regulatory requirements;
|
|
market
acceptance of our products;
|
|
changes
in government regulations;
|
|
general
economic and market conditions and other external factors;
|
|
actual
or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial and operating results; and
|
|
the
degree of trading liquidity in our common shares.
|
The
availability of a large number of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock may, upon their issuance, lead to dilution of
existing stockholders.
We
are authorized to issue 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share. As of September 29, 2016, 11,116,077 shares
of Common Stock were issued and outstanding and approximately 8 million shares are reserved for issuance for warrants, options,
preferred shares and deferred compensation. The remaining shares may be issued by our board of directors without further stockholder
approval. The issuance of large numbers of shares, possibly at below market prices, would be likely to result in substantial dilution
to the interests of other stockholders. In addition, issuances of large numbers of shares may adversely affect the market price
of our Common Stock.
Further,
our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share of which as of September
30, 2016, 270,307 shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding. The board of directors is authorized to provide for the
issuance of these unissued shares of preferred stock in one or more series, and to fix the number of shares and to determine the
rights, preferences and privileges thereof. Accordingly, the board of directors may issue preferred stock that convert into large
numbers of shares of Common Stock and consequently lead to further dilution of other shareholders. There is also a large number
of warrants and options outstanding which, if fully exercised, would increase the number of outstanding shares by approximately
6.7 million. The weighted average issue price for the exercise of these warrants and options is $2.32. In addition, if fully converted,
the Company’s outstanding convertible debentures and accrued interest would increase the number of outstanding shares by
approximately 235,926. The Preferred D Shares are convertible into approximately 1.3 million shares.
We
have never paid cash dividends and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future.
We
have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common shares. We currently plan to retain any earnings to finance the growth
of our business rather than to pay cash dividends. Payments of any cash dividends in the future will depend on our financial condition,
results of operations and capital requirements, as well as other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
Our
Common Stock is subject to the “Penny Stock” rules of the SEC and the trading market in our securities is limited,
which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.
The
Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for
the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price
of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules
require:
That
a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and The broker or dealer receives from the
investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.
In
order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:
Obtain
financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and Make a reasonable determination that the transactions
in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be
capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
The
broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission
relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:
Sets
forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and That the broker or dealer received a signed,
written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.
Generally,
brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make
it more difficult for investors to dispose of our Common Stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.
Disclosure
also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the
commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the
rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to
be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny
stocks.
Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) sales practice requirements may limit a shareholder’s ability
to buy and sell our Common Stock.
In
addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an
investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that
customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make
reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other
information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced
securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend
that their customers buy our Common Stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on
the market for our shares.
Our
stock is thinly traded, so you may be unable to sell your shares at or near the quoted bid prices if you need to sell a significant
number of your shares.
The
shares of our Common Stock are thinly-traded on the OTCQB, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our Common
Stock at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent.A s a consequence, there may be periods
of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which
has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share
price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our Common Stock will develop
or be sustained, or that current trading levels will be sustained. Due to these conditions, we can give you no assurance that
you will be able to sell your shares at or near bid prices or at all if you need money or otherwise desire to liquidate your shares.
Shares
eligible for future sale may adversely affect the market.
From
time to time, certain of our stockholders may be eligible to sell all or some of their shares of Common Stock by means of ordinary
brokerage transactions in the open market pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act, subject to certain limitations.
In general, pursuant to amended Rule 144, non-affiliate stockholders may sell freely after six months subject only to the current
public information requirement. Affiliates may sell after six months subject to the Rule 144 volume, manner of sale (for equity
securities), current public information and notice requirements. Any substantial sales of our Common Stock pursuant to Rule 144
may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our Common Stock.
We
could issue additional Common Stock, which might dilute the book value of our Common Stock.
Our
Board of Directors has authority, without action or vote of our shareholders, to issue all or a part of our authorized but unissued
shares. Such stock issuances could be made at a price that reflects a discount or a premium from the then-current trading price
of our Common Stock. In addition, in order to raise capital, we may need to issue securities that are convertible into or exchangeable
for our Common Stock. These issuances would dilute the percentage ownership interest, which would have the effect of reducing
your influence on matters on which our shareholders vote, and might dilute the book value of our Common Stock. You may incur additional
dilution if holders of stock warrants or options, whether currently outstanding or subsequently granted, exercise their options,
or if warrant holders exercise their warrants to purchase shares of our Common Stock.
Our
Common Stock could be further diluted as the result of the issuance of convertible securities, warrants or options.
In
the past, we have issued convertible securities (such as convertible debentures and notes), warrants and options in order to raise
capital or as compensation for services and incentive compensation for our employees and directors. As of September 29, 2016 the
Company has outstanding (a) $300,000 of convertible debt outstanding, which if fully converted together with accrued interest
would result in the issuance of an additional 235,926 shares of Company Common Stock and (b) warrants and options to purchase
6.7 million shares of Company Common Stock.W e have shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of certain
of these securities and may increase the shares reserved for these purposes in the future. Our issuance of these convertible securities,
options and warrants could affect the rights of our stockholders, could reduce the market price of our Common Stock or could result
in adjustments to exercise prices of outstanding warrants (resulting in these securities becoming exercisable for, as the case
may be, a greater number of shares of our Common Stock), or could obligate us to issue additional shares of Common Stock to certain
of our stockholders.A ll of these actions could serve to dilute the interests of the holders of our Common Stock
If
we fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, the price of our Common Stock may be adversely affected.
Our
internal control over financial reporting may have weaknesses and conditions that could require correction or remediation, the
disclosure of which may have an adverse impact on the price of our Common Stock.W e are required to establish and maintain appropriate
internal controls over financial reporting.F ailure to establish those controls, or any failure of those controls once established,
could adversely affect our public disclosures regarding our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.I
n addition, management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting may identify weaknesses and conditions
that need to be addressed in our internal controls over financial reporting or other matters that may raise concerns for investors.A
ny actual or perceived weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting or
disclosure of management’s assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting may have an adverse impact on the
price of our Common Stock.
We
are required to comply with certain provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and if we fail to comply in a
timely manner, our business could be harmed and our stock price could decline.
Rules
adopted by the SEC pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require an annual assessment of internal controls
over financial reporting, and for certain issuers an attestation of this assessment by the issuer’s independent registered
public accounting firm.T he standards that must be met for management to assess the internal controls over financial reporting
as effective are evolving and complex, and require significant documentation, testing, and possible remediation to meet the detailed
standards.W e expect to incur expenses and to devote resources to Section 404 compliance on an ongoing basis.I t is difficult
for us to predict how long it will take or costly it will be to complete the assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting for each year and to remediate any deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. As
a result, we may not be able to complete the assessment and remediation process on a timely basis.I n addition, although attestation
requirements by our independent registered public accounting firm are not presently applicable to us we could become subject to
these requirements in the future and we may encounter problems or delays in completing the implementation of any resulting changes
to internal controls over financial reporting.I n the event that our President or Chief Financial Officer determine that our internal
control over financial reporting is not effective as defined under Section 404, we cannot predict how regulators will react or
how the market prices of our shares will be affected; however, we believe that there is a risk that investor confidence and share
value may be negatively affected.
USE
OF PROCEEDS
This
prospectus relates to the resale of our common stock that may be offered and sold from time to time by the selling stockholders.
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock in this offering.
DETERMINATION
OF OFFERING PRICE
All
shares of our common stock being offered will be sold by the selling stockholders without our involvement. It is our expectation
that the selling shareholders will sell their shares at the market prices prevailing from time-to-time.
DILUTION
The
common stock to be sold by the selling shareholders is common stock that is currently issued or will be issued to our shareholders
upon exercise of certain Warrants issued by the Company. Accordingly, there will be no dilution to our existing shareholders from
these sales, other than from the exercise of the Warrants.
SELLING
STOCKHOLDERS
The
following table sets forth the number of shares of Company common stock owned and issuable on the exercise of warrants beneficially
owned, as of the date of this prospectus, by the selling stockholders prior to the offering contemplated by this prospectus, the
number of shares which are issuable on the exercise of warrants beneficially owned by each selling stockholder which is being
offered by this prospectus and the number of shares which are issuable on the exercise of warrants beneficially owned which each
selling stockholder would own beneficially if all such offered shares are sold. None of the selling stockholders is known to us
to be a registered broker-dealer or an affiliate of a registered broker-dealer. Each of the selling stockholders has acquired
his, her or its shares solely for investment and not with a view to or for resale or distribution of such securities. Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities.
|
|
Shares
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
of
|
|
|
Percentage
of
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Shares
of
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
|
Owned
Prior to
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Owned
After
|
|
|
Owned
After
|
|
|
|
the
Offering (2)
|
|
|
to
be Sold (3)
|
|
|
the
Offering
|
|
|
this
Offering
|
|
Name (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abrams,
Dennis IRA/ RBC Capital Markets Corp. F.B.O.
|
|
|
22,224
|
|
|
|
22,224
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Altieri, Francis IRA/
RBC Capital Markets Corp. F.B.O
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Bagley, Jr. Theodore
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Behar, Michael Roth
IRA / RBC Capital Markets Corp. F.B.O.
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Bob Bridges
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Dell’Aera, Mario
|
|
|
178,890
|
|
|
|
178,890
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Herbranson, Dale E.
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Jenkins, Steven IRA
/ RBC Capital Markets Corp. LLC Cust
|
|
|
33,336
|
|
|
|
33,336
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Mathias, William
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
McLoughlin, Mick
|
|
|
111,112
|
|
|
|
111,112
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Moroney, Robert and
Carole R. JTTEN
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Pileggi, Kenneth W.
IRA / RBC Capital Markets Corp. FBO
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Scott, Duncan
|
|
|
16,668
|
|
|
|
16,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Timothy H. Shear DEC
of Trust DTD 1/6/1994
|
|
|
8,334
|
|
|
|
8,334
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Skutt, Glenn Richard
& Lesley Howard JTTEN
|
|
|
27,780
|
|
|
|
27,780
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Takada, Hideo
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Teicher, Howard
|
|
|
4,168
|
|
|
|
4,168
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Abbott, Dennis IRA
/ RBC Capital Markets Corp. FBO
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Wallitt, Steve
|
|
|
16,668
|
|
|
|
16,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Giordano, Nicholas
|
|
|
33,334
|
|
|
|
33,334
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Abrams, Mark
|
|
|
138,890
|
|
|
|
138,890
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Richards, Donald J.
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Iacobello, Paul &
Gina
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Fountainhead Capital
Partners Limited
|
|
|
794,280
|
|
|
|
794,280
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Steven R. Antico
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Alan Antokal
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
The Apregan Family
Trust DTD 2/11/98
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Peter Backus
|
|
|
100,002
|
|
|
|
100,002
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Michael G. Cadwell
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Richard A. Cloyd
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Jason Cohen
|
|
|
83,334
|
|
|
|
83,334
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Chad Critchley
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Scott Cunningham
|
|
|
16,668
|
|
|
|
16,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Duncan Scott
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Donald P. Favre
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
RBC Capital Markets
Corp. FBO Susan A Izard IRA
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Alistair Eric Maccallum
Laband
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Steven L. Lew
|
|
|
3,890
|
|
|
|
3,890
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
James P. Little
|
|
|
22,224
|
|
|
|
22,224
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Raylan Loggins
|
|
|
16,668
|
|
|
|
16,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Michael Lutze
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Ulrich Otto
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
David Rush
|
|
|
111,112
|
|
|
|
111,112
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
William C. Slater
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Timothy Shear Dec of
Trust DTD 1/6/1974
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Salman Wakil
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Orville A. White
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Chris Hayden
|
|
|
22,224
|
|
|
|
22,224
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Hugo Were
|
|
|
83,334
|
|
|
|
83,334
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Stephan Forstmann
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Altshuler, Howard
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
RBC Capital Markets
LLC FBO Michael A Boulus IRA
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Brickley, Robert J.
|
|
|
8,334
|
|
|
|
8,334
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
DiBenedetto, Robert
D.
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Fogle, Richard
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Kaspar, Mark
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
MacKenzie, Kevin M.
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Nesland, Brett
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Rey 1998 Family Trust
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Sweeney, David
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Trafford, John
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Ufheil, David A.
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Simon, Michael &
Mary
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Boltz, Willliam
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Sedberry, Erica Pitman
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Apgar, Christopher
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Shankara, Srinivas
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
11,112
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Scheuer, Ricardon &
Silvia Suarez
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Barba, Randolph
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Bell, Stephen
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Cranshire Capital Master
Fund LTD
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
41,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Intracoastal Capital,
LLC
|
|
|
13,888
|
|
|
|
13,888
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Fisher, Patricia
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Gissler, Donald
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
RBC Capital Markets
LLC FBO Gregory J Carter IRA
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Hoffman, Michael L.
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Kayman, Rob
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
King, David
|
|
|
6,668
|
|
|
|
6,668
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Koncsics, Tom
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Kytomaa, Harri
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
RBC Capital Markets
LLC Linda Friedman Roth IRA
|
|
|
2,778
|
|
|
|
2,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Prayaga, Sankar and
Prayaga Gayathri JTTEN
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Todd Channell Trust
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Richard Hoffman
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Hugh Campbell
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Fraser Campbell
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Boris and Alexandra
Smirnoff
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Nadejda Kassatkina
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Irina Pavlova
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Apex Technology Ventures,
LLC
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Robert S. Prag
|
|
|
44,446
|
|
|
|
44,446
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
JSL Kids Partners
|
|
|
72,224
|
|
|
|
72,224
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Thomas Varga TTEE Prag
Children’s Trust FBO Andrew Prag
|
|
|
15,278
|
|
|
|
15,278
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Thomas Varga TTEE Prag
Children’s Trust FBO Robert Prag Jr.
|
|
|
15,278
|
|
|
|
15,278
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
RBC Capital Markets
LLC FBO Jane Ellis
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
55,556
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Guri Dauti
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
27,778
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
3,991,202
|
|
|
|
3,991,202
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
(1)
|
All
shares are owned of record and beneficially unless otherwise indicated. Beneficial ownership information for the selling stockholders
is provided as of September 29, 2016, based upon information provided by the selling stockholders or otherwise known to us.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Represents
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Series A and Series B Warrants.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Assumes
the sale of all shares of common stock registered pursuant to this prospectus. The selling stockholders are under no obligation
known to us to sell any shares of common stock at this time.
|
PLAN
OF DISTRIBUTION
Each
Selling Stockholder (the
“Selling Stockholders
”) of the securities and any of their pledgees, assignees and
successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their securities covered hereby on the principal Trading Market
or any other stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the securities are traded or in private transactions. These sales
may be at fixed or negotiated prices. A Selling Stockholder may use any one or more of the following methods when selling securities:
●
|
ordinary
brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
|
|
|
●
|
block
trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the securities as agent but may position and resell a portion of the
block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
|
|
|
●
|
purchases
by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
|
|
|
●
|
an
exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
|
|
|
●
|
privately
negotiated transactions;
|
|
|
●
|
settlement
of short sales;
|
|
|
●
|
in
transactions through broker-dealers that agree with the Selling Stockholders to sell a specified number of such securities
at a stipulated price per security;
|
|
|
●
|
through
the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise;
|
|
|
●
|
a
combination of any such methods of sale; or
|
|
|
●
|
any
other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.
|
The
Selling Stockholders may also sell securities under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities
Act
”), if available, rather than under this prospectus.
Broker-dealers
engaged by the Selling Stockholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive
commissions or discounts from the Selling Stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of securities,
from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, but, except as set forth in a supplement to this Prospectus, in the case of an
agency transaction not in excess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 2440; and in the case of a
principal transaction a markup or markdown in compliance with FINRA IM-2440.
In
connection with the sale of the securities or interests therein, and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, the Selling
Stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage
in short sales of the securities in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The Selling Stockholders may also sell securities
short and deliver these securities to close out their short positions, or loan or pledge the securities to broker-dealers that
in turn may sell these securities. The Selling Stockholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers
or other financial institutions or create one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or
other financial institution of securities offered by this prospectus, which securities such broker-dealer or other financial institution
may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).
The
Selling Stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the securities may be deemed to be “underwriters”
within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers
or agents and any profit on the resale of the securities purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts
under the Securities Act. Each Selling Stockholder has informed the Company that it does not have any written or oral agreement
or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the securities.
The
Company is required to pay certain fees and expenses incurred by the Company incident to the registration of the securities. The
Company has agreed to indemnify the Selling Stockholders against certain losses, claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilities
under the Securities Act.
Because
Selling Stockholders may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, they will be subject
to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act including Rule 172 thereunder. In addition, any securities covered
by this prospectus which qualify for sale pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act may be sold under Rule 144 rather than
under this prospectus. The Selling Stockholders have advised us that there is no underwriter or coordinating broker acting in
connection with the proposed sale of the resale securities by the Selling Stockholders.
We
agreed to keep this prospectus effective until the earlier of (i) the date on which the securities may be resold by the Selling
Stockholders without registration and without regard to any volume or manner-of-sale limitations by reason of Rule 144, without
the requirement for the Company to be in compliance with the current public information under Rule 144 under the Securities Act
or any other rule of similar effect or (ii) all of the securities have been sold pursuant to this prospectus or Rule 144 under
the Securities Act or any other rule of similar effect. The resale securities will be sold only through registered or licensed
brokers or dealers if required under applicable state securities laws. In addition, in certain states, the resale securities covered
hereby may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the
registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with.
Under
applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the resale securities may not
simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the common stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined
in Regulation M, prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the Selling Stockholders will be subject to applicable
provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of
purchases and sales of securities of the common stock by the Selling Stockholders or any other person. We will make copies of
this prospectus available to the Selling Stockholders and have informed them of the need to deliver a copy of this prospectus
to each purchaser at or prior to the time of the sale (including by compliance with Rule 172 under the Securities Act).
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED
Our
authorized capital stock consists of 25,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share, the rights and preferences of which may be established from time to time by our
board. As of September 29, 2016, there were 11,116,077 shares of common stock and one (1) share of Series C Preferred Stock and
270,307 shares of Series D Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
Common
Stock
Holders
of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters voted upon by our stockholders, including the election
of directors, and do not have cumulative voting rights. Subject to the rights of holders of any then outstanding shares of our
preferred stock, our common stockholders are entitled to any dividends that may be declared by our board. Holders of our common
stock are entitled to share ratably in our net assets upon our dissolution or liquidation after payment or provision for all liabilities
and any preferential liquidation rights of our preferred stock then outstanding. Holders of our common stock have no preemptive
rights to purchase shares of our stock. The shares of our common stock are not subject to any redemption provisions and are not
convertible into any other shares of our capital stock. All outstanding shares of our common stock are, and the shares of common
stock to be issued in the offering will be, upon payment therefor, fully paid and non-assessable. The rights, preferences and
privileges of holders of our common stock will be subject to those of the holders of any shares of our preferred stock we may
issue in the future.
Between
January 2 and April 25, 2014, the Company completed the sale of $5,000,000 in Units comprising Common Stock and Warrants (the
“Units”) to accredited investors (the “Investors”) in a private placement (the “Placement”).
Each Unit was priced at $1.80 and comprised one share of Company Common Stock (the “Shares”), a series A warrant (the
“
Series A Warrants
”) to purchase 0.5 shares of common stock and a series B warrant (the “
Series B
Warrants
” and together with the Series A Warrants, the “Warrants”) to purchase 0.5 shares of common stock
(the “
Units
”). Each Investor received (i) 3-year detachable Series A Warrants to purchase a number of shares
of Common Stock equal to 50% of the number of Shares purchased by such investor and (ii) 3-year detachable Series B Warrants to
purchase a number of shares of Common Stock equal to 50% of the number of Shares purchased by such investor. The Series A Warrants
have an exercise price per share of $2.05 (subject to adjustment as provided therein). The Series B Warrants have an exercise
price per share of $3.08. The Warrants are subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends or recapitalizations. In the
aggregate, the Company issued 2,777,808 shares of Common Stock, Series A Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,388,919 shares
of Common Stock and Series B Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,388,919 shares of Common Stock.
Fountainhead
Capital Management Limited (“Fountainhead”), the Company’s largest shareholder with approximately 40.0% of the
Common Stock as of September 29, 2016, additionally converted a total of $1,426,542 of accrued consulting fees into an investment
in Units under the Placement, comprising 792,523 shares of Common Stock, Series A Warrants to purchase 396,262 shares of Common
Stock and Series B Warrants to purchase 396,262 shares of Common Stock.
Based
on the subscription terms applicable to the holders of the Company’s previously-issued Series C Convertible Preferred Stock,
such holders were given the option of exchanging their investment in such unconverted Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and
the related warrants into the securities which are the subject of the Placement, based on the amount of their investment in the
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and the related warrants. On February 24, 2014, the holders of 15.15 shares of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock (representing an aggregate investment of $757,700) exchanged their Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and related
warrants for an aggregate of 420,838 shares of Common Stock, Series A Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 210,420 shares of Common
Stock and Series B Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 210,420 shares of Common Stock.
Under
the terms of the Placement Agent agreement with Garden State Securities, Inc., the Company issued an aggregate of 402,030 Placement
Agent Warrants, on almost identical terms to the Series A Warrants.
Preferred
Stock
Our
board may, from time to time, authorize the issuance of one or more classes or series of preferred stock without stockholder approval.
Subject to the provisions of our certificate of incorporation and limitations prescribed by law, our board is authorized to adopt
resolutions to issue shares, establish the number of shares, change the number of shares constituting any series, and provide
or change the voting powers, designations, preferences and relative rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions on shares
of our preferred stock, including dividend rights, terms of redemption, conversion rights and liquidation preferences, in each
case without any action or vote by our stockholders. One of the effects of undesignated preferred stock may be to enable our board
to discourage an attempt to obtain control of our company by means of a tender offer, proxy contest, merger or otherwise. The
issuance of preferred stock may adversely affect the rights of our common stockholders by, among other things:
●
|
Restricting
dividends on the common stock;
|
●
|
diluting
the voting power of the common stock;
|
●
|
impairing
the liquidation rights of the common stock; or
|
●
|
delaying
or preventing a change in control without further action by the stockholders.
|
Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock
At
this time, there is one (1) share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. Each share of Series C Preferred
Convertible Stock is convertible (at the Holder’s option or mandatorily upon the occurrence of certain events) into 14,815
shares of the Company’s Common Stock (at $3.75 per share).
Series
D Convertible Preferred Stock
At
this time, there are 270,307 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series D”) issued and outstanding. Series
D shares that are convertible into Company Common Shares at a price of $2.15. The Series D carry a cumulative preferred dividend
of 7% per annum, payable in cash or Series D at the Company’s option. On the second (2nd) anniversary of the date of issuance
of the Series D, the dividend rate is increased to 12% per annum. The Company is able to redeem the Series D at par at any time,
at its sole option.
MARKET
FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Market
Information
Beginning
on July 20, 2009, our Common Stock was quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (now the OTCQB) under the symbol “VYCO”.
The
following table shows the high and low prices of our common shares on the OTC Bulletin Board (now the OTCQB) for each quarter
for fiscal years 2014 and 2015 and the first two quarters of 2016. The following quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without
retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions:
Period
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
January
1, 2014-March 31, 2014
|
|
|
$
|
3.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
April 1, 2014-June
30, 2014
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
July 1, 2014-September
30, 2014
|
|
|
$
|
3.12
|
|
|
$
|
2.06
|
|
October 1, 2014-December
31, 2014
|
|
|
$
|
2.37
|
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
January 1, 2015-March
31, 2015
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
April 1, 2015-June
30, 2015
|
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
July 1, 2015-September
30, 2015
|
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
October 1, 2015-December
31, 2015
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
January 1, 2016-March
31, 2016
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
April 1, 2016-June
31, 2016
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
The
market price of our common stock, like that of other technology companies, is highly volatile and is subject to fluctuations in
response to variations in operating results, announcements of technological innovations or new products, or other events or factors.
Our stock price may also be affected by broader market trends unrelated to our performance.
Holders
As
of September 29, 2016, there were approximately 133 record holders of our common stock and there were 11,116,077 shares of our
common stock issued and outstanding. Please see SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT for information
related to the holdings of certain beneficial owners and management of the Company.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
Our
transfer agent is Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc., 3200 Cherry Creek Dr. South, Suite 430, Denver, CO 80209, tel. (303) 282-4800.
Dividend
Policy
We
have never paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Common Stock in
the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings to fund ongoing operations and future capital requirements of our
business. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent
upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems
relevant.
The
Securities Enforcement and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990
The
Securities and Exchange Commission has also adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions
in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered
on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the Nasdaq system, provided that current price and volume information with
respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system).
A
purchaser is purchasing penny stock which limits the ability to sell the stock. The shares offered by this prospectus constitute
penny stock under the Securities and Exchange Act. The shares will remain penny stocks for the foreseeable future. The classification
of penny stock makes it more difficult for a broker-dealer to sell the stock into a secondary market, which makes it more difficult
for a purchaser to liquidate his/her investment. Any broker-dealer engaged by the purchaser for the purpose of selling his or
her shares in us will be subject to Rules 15g-1 through 15g-10 of the Securities and Exchange Act. Rather than creating a need
to comply with those rules, some broker-dealers will refuse to attempt to sell penny stock.
The
penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, to deliver
a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Commission, which:
●
|
contains
a description of the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading;
|
●
|
contains
a description of the broker’s or dealer’s duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the
customer with respect to a violation to such duties or other requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended;
|
●
|
contains
a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including “bid” and “ask” prices for penny
stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price;
|
●
|
contains
a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions;
|
●
|
defines
significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading penny stocks; and
|
●
|
contains
such other information and is in such form (including language, type, size and format) as the Securities and Exchange Commission
shall require by rule or regulation;
|
The
broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, to the customer:
●
|
the
bid and offer quotations for the penny stock;
|
●
|
the
compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction;
|
●
|
the
number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity
of the market for such stock; and
|
●
|
monthly
account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account.
|
In
addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the
broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive
the purchaser’s written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement to transactions
involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement. These disclosure requirements will have
the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our stock because it will be subject to these penny stock
rules. Therefore, stockholders may have difficulty selling their securities.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information Stock
Option
Plan
The
Company adopted the Vycor Medical, Inc Employee, Director, and Consultant Stock Plan (the “Plan”) as of February 13,
2008. The Plan provides for both incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options to be granted to employees, officers,
consultants, independent contractors, directors and affiliates of the Company. The board of directors establishes the terms and
conditions of all stock option grants, subject to the Plan and applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Incentive stock
options must be granted at an exercise price not less than the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. The options
granted to participants owning more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding voting stock must be granted at an exercise price
not less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. The options expire on the date determined by
the board of directors, but may not extend mare than 10 years from the grant date, while incentive stock options granted to participants
owning more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding voting stock expire five years from the grant date. The vesting period
for employees is generally over three years. The vesting Period for non-employees is determined based on the services being provided.
The maximum number of shares of stock which may be delivered under the plan shall automatically increase by a number sufficient
to cause the number of shares covered by the plan to equal 10% of the total number of shares of stock then outstanding on a fully
diluted basis.
Under
ASC Topic 718, the Company estimates the fair value of option awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model. The grant
date fair value is recognized over the option vesting period, the period during which an employee is required to provide service
in exchange for the award. No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite
service. Under these standards, compensation cost for employee cost for employee stock-based awards is based on the estimated
grant- date fair value and recognized over the vesting period of the applicable award on a straight-line basis. As of September
29, 2016, there were options outstanding under the Stock Option Plan to purchase 6,007,048 outstanding at an average exercise
price of $2.57 per share.
Stock
appreciation rights may be granted either on a stand-alone basis or in conjunction with all or part of any other stock options
granted under the plan. As of September 29, 2016 there were no awards of any stock appreciation rights.
Reports
We
are subject to certain reporting requirements and will furnish annual financial reports to our stockholders, certified by our
independent accountants, and will furnish unaudited quarterly financial reports in our quarterly reports filed electronically
with the SEC. All reports and information filed by us can be found at the SEC website, www.sec.gov.
INTEREST
OF NAMED EXPERT AND COUNSEL
The
Law Offices of Robert L. B. Diener, 41 Ulua Place, Haiku, HI 96708 was retained for the purpose of preparing this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 3 to the registration statement on Form S-1, rendering the legal opinion attached as an exhibit relative to the
validity of the common stock to be issued pursuant to this Registration Statement and for an opinion letter to the auditor which
was required to complete the audit enclosed herein. As payment for said service, the Law Office of Robert L. B. Diener was paid
a total of $2,500. The Law Offices of Robert L. B. Diener is not receiving any contingent interest, fee or shares in the Company.
The
Law Office of Robert L. B. Diener may be retained for additional legal services in the future at fees to be agreed upon.
The
financial statements of Vycor Medical, Inc., as provided herein, have been audited by an independent registered public accounting
firm. The audit firm that has provided the audited financials is Paritz & Co., P.A., 15 Warren St., Hackensack NJ 07601. Paritz
& Co., P.A. is not receiving any contingent interest, fee or shares in the Company.
INFORMATION
WITH RESPECT TO THE REGISTRANT
Business
Overview
The
Company was formed as a limited liability company under the laws of the State of New York on June 17, 2005 as “Vycor Medical
LLC”. On August 14, 2007, we converted into a Delaware corporation and changed our name to “Vycor Medical, Inc.”.
The Company’s listing went effective on February 2009 and on November 29, 2010 Vycor completed the acquisition of substantially
all of the assets of NovaVision, Inc. (“NovaVision”) and on January 4, 2012 Vycor, through its wholly-owned NovaVision
subsidiary, completed the acquisition of all the shares of Sight Science Limited (“Sight Science”), a previous competitor
to NovaVision.
Vycor
is dedicated to providing the medical community with innovative and superior surgical and therapeutic solutions and operates two
distinct business units within the medical device industry. Vycor Medical designs, develops and markets medical devices for use
in neurosurgery. NovaVision provides non-invasive rehabilitation therapies for those who have vision disorders resulting from
neurological brain damage such as that caused by a stroke. Both businesses adopt a minimally or non-invasive approach. Both technologies
have strong sales growth potential, address large potential markets and have the requisite regulatory approvals. The Company has
57 issued or allowed patents and a further 13 pending. The Company leverages joint resources across the divisions to operate in
a cost-efficient manner.
The
Company periodically engages in discussions with potential strategic partners for or purchasers of each or both of our operating
divisions.
Vycor
Medical
Vycor
Medical designs, develops and markets medical devices for use in neurosurgery. Vycor Medical’s ViewSite Brain Access System
(“VBAS”) is a next generation retraction and access system that was fully commercialized in early 2010 and is the
first significant technological change to brain tissue retraction in over 50 years in contrast to significant development in most
other neuro-surgical technologies. Vycor Medical is ISO 13485:2003 compliant, and VBAS has U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance and CE Marking
for Europe (Class III) for brain and spine surgeries, and regulatory approvals in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Korea, Japan,
Russia and Taiwan.
We
believe VBAS offers several advantages over other brain retractor systems, commonly known as ribbon or blade retractors that are
metallic, including having the potential to significantly reduce brain tissue trauma that arises from excessive pressure at the
edges of the blade. The design of VBAS can minimize the size of the brain entry access necessary for surgical procedures, and
is believed to significantly reduce the pressure and hence trauma on the surrounding brain tissue.
NovaVision
NovaVision provides non-invasive, computer-based
rehabilitation targeted at a substantial and largely un-addressed market of people who have lost their sight as a result of stroke
or other brain injury. NovaVision addresses a significant target market, estimated at approximately $2 billion in each of the U.S.
and the EU and over $13 billion globally.
NovaVision has a family of therapies that both
restore and compensate for lost vision:
●
|
Restoration of vision: NovaVision’s VRT and Sight Science’s Neuro-Eye Therapy (NeET), aim to improve visual sensitivity in a person’s blind area. VRT delivers a series of light stimuli along the border of the patient’s visual field loss. These programmed light sequences stimulate the border zone between the “seeing” and “blind” visual fields, repetitively challenging the visual cortex in the border zone with a large number of stimuli over the course of time. NeET targets deep within the blind area by repeated stimulation, allowing patients to detect objects within the blind field.
|
|
|
●
|
Compensation and re-training: Normal eye movements are also affected after brain injury adding to the problems of blindness. NeuroEyeCoach provides a complementary therapy to VRT and NeET, which re-trains a patient to move their eyes, re-integrate left and right vision and to make the most of their remaining visual field.
|
VRT and NeuroEyeCoach are therefore highly
complementary and are provided in an Internet-delivered suite to ensure broad benefits to NovaVision’s patients.
NovaVision also has models of VRT and NeuroEyeCoach
for physicians and rehabilitation clinics, as well as VIDIT, a diagnostic program that enables therapists to perform high-resolution
visual field tests in less than ten minutes.
NovaVision’s VRT is the only medical
device aimed at the restoration of vision lost as a result of neurological damage which has FDA 510(k) clearance to be marketed
in the U.S; and NeuroEyeCoach is registered in the US as a Class I 510(k) exempt device. VRT, NEC and NeET have CE Marking for
the EU. NovaVision has 41 granted and 2 pending patents worldwide.
Competition
The VBAS device is both a brain access system
and a retractor and is therefore unique with no direct competitors. Competitive manufacturers of brain retractors include Cardinal
Health (V. Mueller line), Aesculap, Integra Life Science and Codman (Division of Johnson & Johnson). Nico Corporation has a
brain access device specifically designed to work with its Myriad resection and suction product.
NovaVision provides restoration therapies (VRT
and NeET) and compensation or saccadic therapies (NeuroEyeCoach) for those suffering vision loss as a result of neurological trauma.
The other therapy type for this condition is substitution (optical aids such as prisms) and is not considered by NovaVision as
competition.
In restoration, competition has been reduced
through NovaVision’s acquisition of Sight Science and there are a few very small companies or entities offering some form
of vision rehabilitation product in Germany. Within compensation there are no real direct competitors. Other companies in the general
rehabilitation space include RevitalVision, PositScience and Dynavision. In the professional market, NovaVision competes with aggregator
products or those that provide a range of non-specific therapies, such a Rehacom, Sanet Vision Integrator and Bioness BITS. NovaVision’s
products are dedicated to vision.
The Market For the Company’s Products
And Therapies
VBAS is used for craniotomy procedures. Based
on statistics from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), management estimates 700,000 such procedures are performed
in the US annually. Of this, management believe approximately 225,000 (32 percent) are addressable by the VBAS range currently,
with another 100,000 (total of 325,000 or 46 percent) addressable by an expanded future range. Management estimates, for the global
market, there exists a current addressable market of approximately 1,100,000 procedures with another 500,000 addressable by an
expanded VBAS range.
The market for NovaVision’s therapies
comprises those suffering from vision loss resulting from neurological trauma such as stroke or other brain injury. The U.S. Centers
for Disease Control (CDC) estimates there are approximately 8 million Americans who have previously had a stroke incident, with
795,000 additional strokes occurring annually; adjusting for repeat strokes and deaths, there are 481,000 new stroke survivors
each year. Additionally, approximately 5.3 million Americans live with the long-term effects of a TBI, with 275,000 hospitalizations
each year. The most recent scientific research estimates that approximately 28.5% experience some visual impediment and 20.5% of
these patients experience a permanent visual field deficit, reducing mobility and other activities of daily living. The target
market for VRT and NeET is this 20.5% subset of patients who have suffered a permanent visual field deficit; NeuroEyeCoach addresses
all 28.5% of patients who experience visual impediments. Management estimates that the addressable target market for its therapies
is approximately 2.9 million people in the US, approximately 2.8 million people in Europe and approximately 12.9 million people
throughout the rest of the world.
Our Growth Strategy
Vycor Medical
Vycor Medical’s growth strategy includes:
1. Increasing U.S. market penetration through
broader hospital coverage and targeted direct physician marketing. Vycor Medical’s sales and marketing strategy is to penetrate
a well-defined target market of 4,500 neurosurgeons. Vycor markets direct to surgeons as well as marketing and distributing through
independent distributors, with a focus both on adding new hospitals and expanding to additional surgeons in hospitals where VBAS
is already approved, and to expand usage to a broader range of procedures. In order to expand its direct marketing and deepening
its penetration, Vycor is exploring the creation of a Centers of Excellence medical education campaign and to that end will be
finalizing new surgeon education and training materials including detailed videos produced with surgeons at Weill Cornell. Vycor
is pursuing a policy of continually evaluating and upgrading its distributors as well as adding additional distributors in regions
where it has little to no presence.
2. Provision of more Clinical and Scientific
Data supporting the products superiority over the current standard-of-care blade retractors and to demonstrate VBAS’ potential
for cost savings. Clinical and scientific data (in the form of peer reviewed articles, clinical studies and other reports and case
studies) are critical in driving adoption, and in turn revenues, further and faster by demonstrating VBAS’ superiority as
a minimally invasive access system which helps VBAS move further up the hospital cost/benefit curve. To date the Company has already
had 10 Peer Reviewed studies and 4 other clinical papers and anticipates further studies to be published.
3. International Market Growth
Vycor Medical utilizes select medical device
distributors with experience in neurosurgical devices in their countries or regions. VBAS has full regulatory approvals in Australia,
Brazil, Canada, China, Europe (EU – Class III), Korea, Japan and Taiwan and is seeking or has partial regulatory approvals
in India, Russia and Vietnam. Vycor Medical is actively pursuing new distribution agreements in the countries where it does not
have any in place.
4. New Product Development
New Product Development is targeted at both
driving the use of its existing VBAS product range through ancillary products and modalities that will facilitate the product’s
use and through new product extensions to broaden VBAS applicability to procedures currently not addressed by the existing product
line.
Vycor is modifying its existing VBAS product
suite to make it more easy to integrate with Image Guidance Systems (IGS) by re-engineering VBAS so that the entire range of 12
devices, excluding the VBASmini, will be able to more easily accommodate pointers from all the main IGS manufacturers. Increasingly,
all major neuro centers have image guidance systems, and where this is in place over 90% of surgeries are carried out using IGS
and management strongly believes that the existing VBAS rigid structure lends itself well to being incorporated into this increasing
trend.
NovaVision
While speech, physical, and occupational therapies
are the long-standing treatment standards for stroke and TBI survivors, VRT is the first and only FDA-cleared clinical component
of vision restoration to physically enhance the visual field after a stroke or brain injury. Increasingly the healthcare community,
partly driven by strong lobbying by stroke associations worldwide, are recognizing that vision is not only a significant issue
post stroke or brain injury, but that visual field loss can have a significant impact on the success of other rehabilitation modalities
and the quality of life.
Our strategic vision for NovaVision has been
to develop and provide a clinically supported, affordable and scalable visual therapy solution offering that provides broad benefits
to those suffering visual impairment following neurological brain damage; and to offer solutions for both patients and physicians
alike. Following a prolonged development program, aimed at broadening patient benefits, significantly reducing cost and making
our therapies affordable and scalable, NovaVision was able to launch its Internet-delivered therapy suite in the US in June 2015
and in Europe in December 2015.
NovaVision has four routes-to-market aimed
at patients and professionals, comprising: direct-to-patient; rehabilitation centers and clinics; stroke associations and support
groups; and physicians. Given the company’s limited resources NovaVision is initially focusing on direct-to-patient, with
a website lead-driven inbound and outbound marketing strategy targeted at prospective patients and relatives. Website metrics –
particularly for the US and more recently Germany – are strong, showing good growth in traffic and rankings, and have been
effective in generating leads. Our analysis of the campaign metrics in the US (including Google Ads) over the last 6 months have
highlighted some key improvements that needed to be implemented which we are carrying out and which we believe could have a material
impact on our lead generation.
Following the pilot launch of our NovaVision
Center Model, comprising a vision diagnostics program and the NeuroEyeCoach training program, we are substantially broadening the
delivery and licensing model in response to feedback from clinics. The new Center Model will have a complete suite for the professional
market, including options for software download, CD Rom, Cloud based and Hardware delivery with flexible and cost-effective pricing
options, and will be offered in both the US and Europe.
Manufacturing
Vycor Medical uses a sub-contract manufacturer
to manufacture, package, label and sterilize its VBAS products. The Company is in the process of migrating all its VBAS manufacturing
to Life Science Outsourcing, Inc. in Brea, California that is FDA-registered and meets ISO standards and certifications.
Intellectual Property
Patents
Vycor Medical maintains a portfolio of patent
protection on its methods and apparatus for its Brain and Spine products and technology in the form of issued patents and applications,
both domestically and internationally, with a total of 16 granted/allowed and 11 pending patents.
NovaVision maintains a portfolio of patent
protection on its methods and apparatus in the form of issued patents and applications, both domestically and internationally,
with a total of 41 granted and 2 pending patents (including Sight Science).
NovaVision’s VRT is the only medical
device aimed at the restoration of vision lost as a result of neurological damage which has FDA 510(k) clearance to be marketed
in the U.S; and NeuroEyeCoach is registered in the US as a Class I 510(k) exempt device.
Trademarks
VYCOR MEDICAL
is a registered trademark
and
VIEWSITE
is a common law trademark.
NovaVision maintains a portfolio of registered
trademarks for
NOVAVISION, NOVAVISION VRT
,
VRT VISION RESTORATION THERAPY
and NEUROEYECOACH, amongst others, along
with relevant logos, both in the US and internationally.
OTHER
Employees
We currently have 12 employees.
Websites
The Company operates websites at www.vycormedical.com,
www.novavision.com and www.sightscience.com
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are subject from time to time to litigation,
claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business. As of October 5, 2016, we were not a party to any material litigation,
claim or suit whose outcome could have a material effect on our financial statements.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
The Company leases approximately 10,000 sq.
ft. located at 6401 Congress Ave., Suite 140, Boca Raton, FL 33487 from Catexor Limited Partnership for a gross rent of $14,260
plus sales tax per month. The term of the lease is 5 years and 6 months terminating July 2017.
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of our financial condition
and results of operation for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016
and 2015 should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes to those statements that are included elsewhere
in this report. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties,
such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth under the “Risk
Factors,” “Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Our Business” sections in
this Form S-1. We use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,”
“continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” “may,”
“will,” “should,” “could,” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Uses of estimates in the preparation
of financial statements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimated.
To the extent management’s estimates prove to be incorrect, financial results for future periods may be adversely affected.
Significant estimates and assumptions contained in the accompanying consolidated financial statements include management’s
estimate of the allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable, amortization of intangible assets, and the fair values of options
and warrant included in the determination of debt discounts and share based compensation.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company maintains cash balances at various
financial institutions. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. Cash
balances may at times exceed the FDIC insured limits. Cash also includes a US investment account in a money market backed by government
securities up to 105% of the account balance. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months
or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Included within cash are deposits paid by patients, held by the Company until the
patient returns the VRT device or chinrest at the end of therapy. At December 31, 2015 and 2014 patient deposits amounted to $27,183
and $32,869, respectively, and are included in other current liabilities.
Fixed assets
The Company records fixed assets at cost and
calculates depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets, which is estimated to be between
three and seven years. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are charged to expense when incurred. Replacements and major renewals
are capitalized
Derivative Liability
The Company accounted for the 34,723 Series
A Warrants issued in connection with the 2014 Offering (all as defined in Note 10), the holders of which had not waived their anti-dilution
rights (as detailed further in Note 10) in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40-15-7D, whereby under that provision,
because they had anti-dilution rights, they did not meet the criteria for equity treatment and must be recorded as a liability.
Accordingly, the Company classified the warrant instrument as a liability at its fair value and adjusted the instrument to fair
value at each reporting period. This liability was subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date until exercised or until
the anti-dilution provisions contained within the warrant agreements expired, and was classified in the balance sheet as a current
liability. Any change in fair value of the warrant liability was recognized in the Company’s statement of operations as other
income (loss). The anti-dilution provisions expired on June 11, 2015 and accordingly the liability has been extinguished.
Income taxes
We use the asset and liability method of accounting
for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” Under this method, income tax expense is recognized
for the amount of: (i) taxes payable or refundable for the current year and (ii) deferred tax consequences of temporary differences
resulting from matters that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates
is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided to
reduce the deferred tax assets reported if based on the weight of the available positive and negative evidence, it is more likely
than not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
ASC Topic 740.10.30 clarifies the accounting
for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a tax return. ASC Topic 740.10.40 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in
interim periods, disclosure, and transition. We have no material uncertain tax positions for any of the reporting periods presented.
Patents and Other Intangible Assets
The Company capitalizes legal and related costs
associated with the establishment and enhancement of patents for its products once patents have been applied for. Costs associated
with the development of the patented item or processes are charged to research and development costs as incurred. The capitalized
costs are amortized over the life of the patent. The Company reviews intangible assets on an annual in accordance with the authoritative
guidance. Trademarks have an indefinite life and are reviewed annually by management for impairment in accordance with the authoritative
guidance.
Software Development Costs
The authoritative accounting guidance requires
software development costs to be capitalized upon completion of the preliminary project stage. Accordingly, direct internal and
external costs associated with the development of the features and functionality of the Company’s software, incurred during
the application development stage, are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated life of five
years.
Revenue Recognition
Vycor Medical generates revenue from the sale
of its surgical access system to hospitals and other medical professionals. Vycor Medical records revenue when a completed contract
for the sale exists, the product is invoiced and shipped to the customer. Vycor Medical does not provide for product returns or
warranty costs.
NovaVision generates revenues from various
programs, therapy services and other sources such as license sales. Therapy services revenues represent fees from NovaVision’s
vision restoration therapy software, eye movement training software, diagnostic software, clinic set up and training fees, and
the professional and support services associated with the therapy. NovaVision provides vision restoration therapy directly to patients.
The typical vision restoration therapy consists of six modules, performed on average over 6 months. A patient contract comprises
set-up fees and monthly therapy fees. Set-up fees are recognized at the outset of the contract and therapy revenue is recognized
ratably over the therapy period. Patient therapy is restricted to being completed by a patient within a specified time frame. NovaVision’s
saccadic training software is generally completed within 2-4 weeks and revenue is therefore recognized fully at commencement.
Deferred revenue results from patients paying
for the therapy in advance of receiving the therapy.
Accounts Receivable
The Company’s accounts receivable are
due from the hospitals and distributors in the case of Vycor Medical, and from patients directly for therapy or physicians for
diagnostic products in the case of NovaVision. Accounts receivable are due once products have been delivered or at the time the
therapy is initiated; however, for NovaVision therapy patients sometimes credit is extended through various payment plans based
on individual financial conditions, generally not to exceed the 9 or 10 month therapy period. The outstanding balances are stated
net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company determines its allowance by considering a number of factors, including the
length of time accounts receivable are past due, and the customer’s ability to pay its obligations. The Company writes off
accounts receivable when they become uncollectible.
Inventory
Inventories are stated at the weighted average
cost method. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price, in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs to complete
and dispose of the product. If the Company identifies excess, obsolete or unsalable items, its inventories are written down to
their realizable value in the period in which the impairment is first identified. The provision for inventory for the years ended
December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $12,633 and $2,567, respectively. Shipping and handling costs incurred for inventory purchases and
product shipments are recorded in cost of sales.
Foreign Currency
The Euro is the local currency of the country
in which NovaVision GmbH conducts its operations and is considered the functional currency of this entity; the GB Pound is the
local currency of the country in which Sight Science Limited conducts its operations and is considered the functional currency
of this entity. All balance sheet amounts are translated to U.S. dollars using the U.S. exchange rate at the balance sheet date
except for the equity section which is translated at historical rates. Operating statement amounts are translated using an average
exchange rate for the period of operations. Foreign currency translation effects are accumulated as part of the accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and included in shareholders’ (deficit) in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Educational marketing and advertising
expenses
The Company may incur costs for the education
of customers on the uses and benefits of its products. The Company will include education, marketing and advertising expense as
a component of selling, general and administrative costs as such costs are incurred.
Contractual Obligations
As a “smaller reporting company”
as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the Year Ended December
31, 2015 to the Year Ended December 31, 2014
Revenue and Gross Margin:
|
|
Segment Information
|
|
|
|
Twelve months ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
885,481
|
|
|
$
|
893,028
|
|
|
|
-1
|
%
|
NovaVision
|
|
$
|
253,153
|
|
|
$
|
357,264
|
|
|
|
-29
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
1,138,634
|
|
|
$
|
1,250,292
|
|
|
|
-9
|
%
|
Cost of Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
(107,528
|
)
|
|
$
|
(112,604
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
NovaVision
|
|
$
|
(56,590
|
)
|
|
$
|
(43,696
|
)
|
|
|
-30
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(164,118
|
)
|
|
$
|
(156,300
|
)
|
|
|
-5
|
%
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
777,953
|
|
|
$
|
780,424
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
NovaVision
|
|
$
|
196,563
|
|
|
$
|
313,568
|
|
|
|
-37
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
974,516
|
|
|
$
|
1,093,992
|
|
|
|
-11
|
%
|
Vycor Medical recorded revenue of $885,481
from the sale of its products for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $7,548 from 2014. This reflected weak sales in
particular in the US in July and August which recovered in September. Gross margin of 88% was achieved in 2015 versus 87% in 2014.
NovaVision recorded revenues of $253,153 for
the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $104,411from 2014, and gross margin of 86%, compared to 88% for 2014. NovaVision’s
US revenues for the first six months of 2015 were impacted by the delayed launch of the new Internet-delivered therapy suite. Since
the launch in the U.S. in late June, NovaVision has achieved a reduction in price to patients of 65%, from $2,500 for a six-month
course of VRT alone to $900 for VRT and NeuroEyeCoach together. Given the price reduction, the company anticipated an initial decrease
in revenues as volumes ramp up due to the new affordable and scalable therapy suite. New patient starts in the US for the second
six months following the launch increased by 139% over the first six months of 2015 and by 57% over the second six months of 2014.
Foreign exchange differences in Europe accounted for $25,939 of the revenue decrease, with the remainder mainly accounted for by
lower license fees as NovaVision migrates to the new model, and lower sales of chinrests, an activity which is being phased out.
The Internet-delivered therapy suite was launched in Europe in December 2015.
Research and Development Expense:
Research and development expenses were $71,512
in 2015 compared to $69,114 for 2014. Capitalized software development costs in NovaVision for the year ended December 31, 2015
and 2014 were $32,843 and $124,660, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company’s VRT 7.0 program was
completed and is now being utilized by patients.
General and Administrative Expenses:
General and administrative expenses decreased
by $854,737 to $2,533,684 in 2015 from $3,388,421 in 2014. Included within General and Administrative Expenses are non-cash charges
for share based compensation as the result of amortizing employee and non-employee shares, warrants and options which have been
issued by the Company over various periods. The charge for 2015 was $274,502, a decrease of $102,160 from $376,662 in 2014. Also
included within General and Administrative Expenses are Sales Commissions, which decreased by $46,771 to $167,546; which related
to a change in Company policy in 2014. The remaining General and Administrative expenses decreased by $705,806 from $2,797,442
to $2,112,440. An analysis of the change in cash and non-cash G&A is shown in the table below:
|
|
Cash G&A
|
|
|
Non-Cash G&A
|
|
2014 offering costs and expenses
|
|
|
(589,208
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Payroll
|
|
|
(1,629
|
)
|
|
|
25,011
|
|
Investor relations and road show costs
|
|
|
(17,004
|
)
|
|
|
(90,647
|
)
|
Legal, professional and other consulting
|
|
|
(70,384
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales, marketing and travel
|
|
|
41,902
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(72,769
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Board, financial and scientific advisory
|
|
|
3,286
|
|
|
|
(36,524
|
)
|
Total change
|
|
|
(705,806
|
)
|
|
$
|
(102,160
|
)
|
Interest Expense:
Interest comprises expense on the Company’s
debt and insurance policy financing. Related Party Interest expense for 2015 decreased following debt repayment or conversion to
$0 from $80,093 in 2014. Other Interest expense for 2015 decreased following debt repayment or conversion by $2,917 to $47,710
from $50,627 for 2014.
Comparison of the Three Months
Ended June 30, 2016 to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Revenue and Gross Margin:
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
333,085
|
|
|
$
|
221,258
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
NovaVision
|
|
$
|
46,321
|
|
|
$
|
64,760
|
|
|
|
-28
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
379,406
|
|
|
$
|
286,018
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
288,812
|
|
|
$
|
193,743
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
NovaVision
|
|
$
|
42,508
|
|
|
$
|
58,294
|
|
|
|
-27
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
331,320
|
|
|
$
|
252,037
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
Vycor Medical recorded revenue of $333,085
from the sale of its products for the three months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $111,827, or 51%, over the same period in
2015. This reflected increased sales in the US and internationally. Gross margin of 87% was recorded for the three months ended
June 30, 2016 compared to 88% for the same period in 2015.
NovaVision recorded revenues of $46,321 for
the three months ended June 30, 2016, a decrease of $18,439 over the same period in 2015, and gross margin of 92%, compared to
90% for the same period in 2015. The U.S. accounted for $3,716 of the decrease with the balance in Europe, where the Internet-delivered
model was launched 6 months later than the U.S. Since the launch in the U.S. of the Internet-delivered model, NovaVision has achieved
a reduction in price to patients of 65%, from $2,500 for a six-month course of VRT alone to $900 for VRT and NeuroEyeCoach together.
Given the price reduction, the company anticipated an initial decrease in revenues as volumes ramp up due to the new affordable
and scalable therapy suite. New patient starts in the U.S. for the three months ended June 30, 2016 increased by 64% over the same
period in 2015. The Internet-delivered therapy suite was launched in Europe in December 2015, where similar price reductions have
been achieved. New patient starts in Europe for the three months ended June 30, 2016 increased by 41% over the same period in 2015.
Research and Development Expense:
Research and development (“R&D”)
expenses were $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to $15,673 for the same period in 2015. Capitalized software
development costs for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were $0 and $13,989, respectively.
General and Administrative Expenses:
NovaVision recorded revenues of $46,321 for the three months ended June 30, 2016, a decrease of $18,439 over the same period in
2015, and gross margin of 92%, compared to 90% for the same period in 2015. The U.S. accounted for $3,716 of the decrease with
the balance in Europe, where the Internet-delivered model was launched 6 months later than the U.S. Since the launch in the U.S.
of the Internet-delivered model, NovaVision has achieved a reduction in price to patients of 65%, from $2,500 for a six-month course
of VRT alone to $900 for VRT and NeuroEyeCoach together. Given the price reduction, the company anticipated an initial decrease
in revenues as volumes ramp up due to the new affordable and scalable therapy suite. New patient starts in the U.S. for the three
months ended June 30, 2016 increased by 64% over the same period in 2015. The Internet-delivered therapy suite was launched in
Europe in December 2015, where similar price reductions have been achieved. New patient starts in Europe for the three months ended
June 30, 2016 increased by 41% over the same period in 2015.
An analysis of the change in cash and non-cash
G&A is shown in the table below:
|
|
Cash G&A
|
|
|
Non-Cash
G&A
|
|
Investor relations and road show costs
|
|
|
(50,534
|
)
|
|
|
14,999
|
|
Other (travel/regulatory/premises)
|
|
|
(29,721
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Board, financial and scientific advisory
|
|
|
(24,588
|
)
|
|
|
27,875
|
|
Sales, marketing and travel
|
|
|
(21,942
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Legal, professional and other consulting
|
|
|
16,620
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Payroll
|
|
|
10,668
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total change
|
|
|
(99,497
|
)
|
|
|
42,874
|
|
Interest Expense:
Interest comprises expense on the Company’s
debt and insurance policy financing. Interest expense for 2016 increased by $1,611 to $13,453 from $11,842 for 2015. The increase
includes interest on Related Party of $1,247.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2016 to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Revenue and Gross Margin:
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
682,006
|
|
|
$
|
480,107
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
NovaVision
|
|
$
|
97,486
|
|
|
$
|
134,463
|
|
|
|
-27
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
779,492
|
|
|
$
|
614,570
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
575,420
|
|
|
$
|
412,794
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
NovaVision
|
|
$
|
88,747
|
|
|
$
|
116,102
|
|
|
|
-24
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
664,167
|
|
|
$
|
528,896
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Vycor Medical recorded revenue of $682,006
from the sale of its products for the six months ended June 30, 2016, an increase of $201,899, or 42%, over the same period in
2015. This reflected increased sales in the US and internationally. Gross margin of 84% was recorded for the three months ended
June 30, 2016 compared to 86% for the same period in 2015; the difference in margin is mainly attributed to costs related to the
migration to a new manufacturer and the manufacturing of the VBASMini.
NovaVision recorded revenues of $97,486 for
the six months ended June 30, 2016, a decrease of $36,977 over the same period in 2015, and gross margin of 91%, compared to 86%
for the same period in 2015. The U.S. accounted for $5,421 of the decrease with the balance in Europe, where the Internet-delivered
model was launched 6 months later than the U.S. Since the launch in the U.S. in late June, NovaVision has achieved a reduction
in price to patients of 65%, from $2,500 for a six-month course of VRT alone to $900 for VRT and NeuroEyeCoach together. Given
the price reduction, the company anticipated an initial decrease in revenues as volumes ramp up due to the new affordable and scalable
therapy suite. New patient starts in the US for the six months ended June 30, 2016 increased by 68% over the same period in 2015.
The Internet-delivered therapy suite was launched in Europe in December 2015, where similar price reductions have been achieved.
New patient starts in Europe for the six months ended June 30, 2016 increased by 28% over the same period in 2015.
Research and Development Expense:
Research and development (“R&D”)
expenses were $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to $38,898 for the same period in 2015. Capitalized software
development costs for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were $0 and $26,486, respectively.
General
and Administrative Expenses
:
General
and administrative expenses decreased by $46,206 to $1,340,846 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $1,387,052 for the
same period in 2015. Included within General and Administrative Expenses are non-cash charges for share based compensation as
the result of amortizing employee and non-employee shares, warrants and options which have been issued by the Company over various
periods. The charge for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $347,950, an increase of $209,488 over $138,462 in 2015. Also included
within General and Administrative Expenses are Sales Commissions, which increased by $8,890 to $94,108. The remaining General
and Administrative expenses decreased by $264,584 from $1,163,372 to $898,792.
An analysis of the change in cash and non-cash
G&A is shown in the table below:
|
|
Cash G&A
|
|
|
Non-Cash G&A
|
|
Investor relations and road show costs
|
|
|
(80,108
|
)
|
|
|
(10,326
|
)
|
Payroll
|
|
|
(71,487
|
)
|
|
|
(20,114
|
)
|
Other (travel/regulatory/premises)
|
|
|
(70,401
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Board, financial and scientific advisory
|
|
|
(64,371
|
)
|
|
|
239,928
|
|
Legal, professional and other consulting
|
|
|
11,030
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales, marketing and travel
|
|
|
10,753
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total change
|
|
|
(264,584
|
)
|
|
|
209,488
|
|
Interest Expense:
Interest
comprises expense on the Company’s debt and insurance policy financing. Interest expense for 2016 increased by $1,753 to
$25,435 from $23,682 for 2015. The increase includes interest on Related Party of $1,247.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
The following table shows cash flow and liquidity
data for the periods ended June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
87,709
|
|
|
$
|
347,477
|
|
|
$
|
(259,768
|
)
|
Accounts receivable, inventory and other current assets
|
|
$
|
551,084
|
|
|
$
|
511,216
|
|
|
$
|
39,868
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
$
|
(1,024,413
|
)
|
|
$
|
(877,009
|
)
|
|
$
|
(147,404
|
)
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
(385,620
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,316
|
)
|
|
$
|
(367,304
|
)
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
145,525
|
|
|
$
|
(85,300
|
)
|
|
$
|
230,825
|
|
Going Concern
The Company’s financial statements have
been presented on a basis that contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course
of business and assumes the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred losses since its inception, including
a net loss of $921,241 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, and the Company expects to continue to incur additional losses in
the future, including additional development costs, costs related to marketing and manufacturing expenses. The Company has incurred
negative cash flows from operations since inception. As of June 30, 2016 the Company had a stockholders’ equity of $657,827
and cash and cash equivalents of $87,709. The Company believes it would not have enough cash to meet its various cash needs unless
the Company is able to obtain additional cash from the issuance of debt or equity securities. There is no assurance that additional
funds from the issuance of equity will be available for the Company to finance its operations on acceptable terms. If adequate
funds are not available, the Company may have to delay development or commercialization of products or technologies that the Company
would otherwise seek to commercialize, or cease some or all of its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the
possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that
may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2016,
we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Seasonality
Our operating results are not affected by seasonality.
Inflation
Our business and operating results are not
affected in any material way by inflation.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Securities and Exchange Commission issued
Financial Reporting Release No. 60, “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies” suggesting
that companies provide additional disclosure and commentary on their most critical accounting policies. In Financial Reporting
Release No. 60, the Securities and Exchange Commission has defined the most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most
important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and operating results, and require management to make its most
difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. See
“Uses of estimates in the preparation of financial statements” above.
CHANGES AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Since inception until the present time, the
principal independent accounting firm for the Company has not resigned, declined to stand for reelection or been dismissed. We
have no disagreements with our independent registered public accounting firm on any matter of accounting principles or with any
financial statement disclosures.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS
AND CONTROL PERSONS
Our Directors and Executive Officers
Set forth below is certain
biographical information concerning our current executive officers and directors. We currently have two executive officers as described
below.
Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
Position/Title
|
|
Age
|
Adrian Christopher Liddell
|
|
Chairman of the Board and a Director
|
|
58
|
Peter C. Zachariou
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and a Director
|
|
55
|
David Marc Cantor
|
|
President and a Director
|
|
50
|
Steven Girgenti
|
|
Director
|
|
70
|
Oscar Bronsther, M.D.
|
|
Director
|
|
64
|
Lowell Rush
|
|
Director
|
|
59
|
Pascale Heuberger
|
|
Director
|
|
45
|
Peter
C. Zachariou,
55, was appointed a Director of the Company in May 2010, Executive Vice President in September 2010 and Chief
Executive Officer on January 2, 2014. He is an investment manager for Fountainhead Capital Management Limited, an investment company
based in Jersey, Channel Islands, which invests in, raises capital for and provides strategic advice to growth companies in healthcare
and other sectors. For the past 20 years, Mr. Zachariou has been an active investor in a variety of companies and industries, both
public and private, specializing in workouts and capital formation. Mr. Zachariou’s investments and activities have predominantly
been in U.S. emerging and growth companies across a broad range of industry sectors. He has also been proprietor and operator of
several businesses in the U.K. and U.S. in the manufacturing, retail and leisure industries.
David
Marc Cantor,
50, has been President of the Company since September 2010 and a Director since January 2010. He is an investment
manager of Fountainhead Capital Management Limited, an investment company based in Jersey, Channel Islands, which invests in, raises
capital for and provides strategic advice to growth companies across a broad range of sectors. Mr. Cantor has over 22 years experience
in Investment Banking with a focus on Mergers and Acquisitions and Equity Capital Raisings. Prior to Fountainhead from 2001 –
2005 he was at Citigroup Capital Markets where he was Co-head of its European Business Development Group and subsequently European
Head of its Diversified Industrials and Aerospace activities. Prior to Citigroup he was a Managing Director in M&A at Donaldson
Lufkin & Jenrette and worked at Lehman Brothers both in New York and London in both the Equity Capital and M&A groups.
Mr. Cantor has a BSc with Honours from City Business School, London.
Adrian
Christopher Liddell,
58, has been Chairman of the Board and a Director of the Company since January 2010, and serves as
the Company’s CFO. He is an advisor to Fountainhead Capital Management Limited, an investment company based in Jersey, Channel
Islands, which invests in, raises capital for and provides strategic advice to growth companies in healthcare and other sectors.
Mr. Liddell has over 30 years of strategic, corporate and financial advisory and company investment experience. From 2003-2006,
Mr. Liddell was an investment advisor at Phoenix Equity Partners, a European private equity fund. From 1998 to 2003, Mr. Liddell
served as Managing Director, Mergers & Acquisitions at Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette and then Citigroup in London. From 1984
to 1998, Mr. Liddell held various positions at Samuel Montagu & Co, and Lehman Brothers in London. Mr. Liddell qualified as
a Chartered Accountant in 1984 and holds an MA from Christ’s College, University of Cambridge.
Steven
Girgenti
, 70, has been a director since November 2008 and is Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee and of
the Compensation Committee. He is presently the Managing Partner of Medi-Pharm Consulting, LLC providing strategic services to
a number of medical device, pharmaceutical and diagnostic businesses. Steve was formerly President, CEO, Director and Co-Founder
of DermWorx, a specialty pharmaceutical company dedicated to solutions for dermatological conditions. Steve was also the Worldwide
Chairman of Ogilvy Healthworld, a leading global healthcare communications network with 55 offices in 36 countries. The network
has more than 1,000 brand assignments from nearly 200 clients worldwide, providing strategic marketing and communications services
to many of the world’s leading healthcare companies. Mr. Girgenti founded Healthworld in 1986 and, under his leadership,
the company made numerous acquisitions to expand and diversify the business. Healthworld went public in 1997. In 1998, and again
in 1999, Business Week named Healthworld one of the “Best Small Corporations in America”. In 1999, Forbes listed Healthworld
as one of the “200 Best Small Companies”. Mr. Girgenti was recognized as “Entrepreneur of the Year” by
NASDAQ in 1999, and was named Med Ad News’ first “Medical Advertising Man of the Year” in 2000. In 2010 he was
inducted into the Medical Advertising Hall of Fame. In addition to Vycor Medical, Mr. Girgenti is a presently Executive Chairman
of BioAffinity Technologies, Inc. (formerly known as Biomoda, Inc.) and has served as a Director of Burren Pharmaceuticals and
Pharmacon International. He is also Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors for the Mt. Sinai Hospital Prostate Disease and Research
Center in New York City, and is on the Board of Directors for Jack Martin Fund, a Mt. Sinai Hospital affiliated charitable organization
devoted to pediatric oncology research. He graduated from Columbia University and has worked in the pharmaceutical industry since
1968 for companies such as Bristol-Myers Squibb, Carter Wallace and DuPont, as well as advertising agencies that specialize in
healthcare. During his career, Steve has held positions in marketing research, product management, new product planning and commercial
development.
Oscar
Bronsther, M.D., F.A.C.S,
64, has been a director since November 2011. Dr. Bronsther is Chief Executive Officer of MetaStat,
Inc. (OTCBB: MTST), a development stage life sciences company that develops and commercializes diagnostic products for the early
and reliable prediction and treatment of systemic metastasisis. Dr Bronsther is also currently Clinical Professor at George Washington
University, Washington, DC and has served in that capacity since 2002. He had previously served as an Associate Professor at the
University of Rochester, Rochester, NY (1994-2001), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (1989-1994) and University of California
San Diego (1984), and Chairman, Section of General Surgery at Inova Fairfax Hospital. Since 2002, he has served as a Board Member,
National Board Member and Director of Transplant Services of Kaiser Permanente Medical Group. Dr. Bronsther is a graduate of the
University of Rochester (B.A. 1973) and Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, N.Y. (M.D. 1978). He did post-graduate work at Downstate
Medical Center (Research Assistant 1975; Kidney Transplant Fellowship 1983-1984), Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, N.Y (Residency
1978-1983) and Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Boston, MA (Research Fellowship 1980-1981). He resides in Potomac, MD.
Lowell
Rush
, 59, was appointed a Director in April 2013 and is Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Rush has extensive experience
in financial management and operational development, and since December 2013 has been Chief Financial Officer of Ft. Lauderdale-based
Direct Insite Corp. (OTCQB:DIRI), a leading provider of cloud-based e-invoicing solutions. Previously, he was Chief Operating Officer
of Miami-based Cosmetic Dermatology, Inc., and held positions as: CFO of Bijoux Terner, LLC (2008-2010); CFO of Little Switzerland,
Inc. (2006-2008); and VP Sales Operations of Rewards Network, Inc. He is a CPA with an MBA in International Business, who has also
held financial management roles at multi-national companies Sunglass Hut International, Burger King Corporation and Knight-Ridder,
Inc. He began his career with the accounting firms Ernst & Young and Deloitte & Touche.
Pascale
Heuberger
, 43, has been our director since October 2007. She is presently the founder and President of Rougemont Management
Services LLC. From 2002-2006, she was a financial officer for John R. Mangiardi, MD, PC and from 2001 - 2002, she was the Assistant
CEO at Hirslanden-Group Management AG, Zurich. Ms. Heuberger holds a Diploma from the Swiss Business Administration School.
All of our directors hold
office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their respective successors have been elected or qualified. Officers
serve at the discretion of the board of directors. There are no family relationships among our directors or executive officers.
There is no arrangement or understanding between or among our officers and directors pursuant to which any director or officer
was or is to be selected as a director or officer, and there is no arrangement, plan or understanding as to whether non-management
stockholders will exercise their voting rights to continue to elect the current board of directors.
None of our directors and
executive officers have during the past five years:
●
|
had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
|
●
|
been convicted in a criminal proceeding and is not subject to a pending criminal proceeding;
|
●
|
been subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities or banking activities;
|
●
|
or been found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.
|
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our Company has three committees
of its Board of Directors—(a) a Nominating and Governance Committee (b) a Management Compensation Committee and (c) an Audit
Committee. The Board of Directors has approved charters for each committee. Steven Girgenti is Chairman of the Nominating and Governance
Committee and the Management Compensation Committee, and Lowell Rush is a member. Lowell Rush is Chairman of the Audit Committee
and Steven Girgenti and Adrian Liddell are members. The Committees are intended to operate consistent with applicable NASDAQ governance
requirements.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation
None of our executive officers
serves as a member of the Board of Directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more of its executive
officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors. There are no family relationships between our officers and directors. Each
director is elected at our annual meeting of stockholders and holds office until the next annual meeting of stockholders, or until
his successor is elected and qualified. At the date of this prospectus, the Company is not engaged in any transactions, either
directly or indirectly, with any persons or organizations considered promoters.
Identification of Significant Employees
The Company does not presently
have any significant employees other than the named officers and directors.
Corporate Code of Conduct and Ethics
On September 25, 2007,
the Company adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics applicable to the Board of Directors, management and all employees of the Company.
Officers and Directors Indemnification
Under our Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws of the corporation, the Company may indemnify an officer or director who is made a party to any proceeding,
including a lawsuit, because of his or her position, if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed
to be in the Company’s best interest. The Company may advance expenses incurred in defending a proceeding. To the extent
that the officer or director is successful on the merits in a proceeding as to which he or she is to be indemnified, the Company
must indemnify the officer or director against all expenses incurred, including attorney’s fees. With respect to a derivative
action, indemnity may be made only for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in defending the proceeding, and if the officer
or director is judged liable, then only by a court order. The indemnification coverage is intended to be to the fullest extent
permitted by applicable laws.
Regarding indemnification
for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, which may be permitted to officers or directors under applicable state
law, the Company is informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, indemnification is against public
policy, as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
Employment Agreements and Executive Compensation
Effective
September 30, 2010, the Company entered into virtually identical employment agreements with David Cantor to serve as the Company’s
President and Peter C. Zachariou to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Each employment agreement continued until
August 30, 2011 and was then automatically extended unless terminated by either party, and provided that the executives receive
no compensation for services rendered under the agreements.
Effective
January 2, 2014, the Company entered into: amended employment agreements with Peter Zachariou and David Cantor to serve as the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President respectively; and an employment agreement with Adrian Liddell to serve as
the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. Each agreement continues for a period of twelve months and is then automatically extended
unless terminated by either party. The agreements provide for no monthly compensation to be payable, but a deferred compensation
payable of $110,000 for each individual, subject to certain conditions and milestones being met.
In
March 2016 the Board of Directors approved the issuance of options to purchase 220,000 shares of Company Common Stock pursuant
to the Vycor Medical, Inc. 2008 Stock Option Plan to each of Peter C. Zachariou, David Cantor and Adrian Liddell, such options
to vest immediately upon issuance. The exercise price of the options is based upon 110% of the closing price of the Company’s
Common Stock the day prior to issuance, and the options are exercisable for a period of three years from issuance
Compensation of Directors
Each of our independent
directors is entitled to receive $7,000 in cash or stock at the option of the company per quarter. No other directors of the Company
receive compensation for their service to the Company.
Other
In February 2010 the
Company entered into a Consulting Agreement (“
Consulting Agreement
”) with Fountainhead Capital Management (“
Fountainhead
”),
which has been amended on several occasions, most recently as of September 30, 2015. Under the terms of the Consulting Agreement,
Fountainhead provides a variety of strategic advisory services to the Company related to its business and overall strategic plan.
Specifically, Fountainhead assists the Company in: the preparation of strategic plans, the identification and evaluation of possible
acquisitions and product additions; identifying potential banks and investors, governance, compliance and negotiations with third
parties. Fountainhead does not have the authority to bind the Company. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, the Company pays Fountainhead
a monthly retainer of $10,000, of which up to $5,000 is payable in cash and the remainder in restricted Common Stock payable quarterly.
Effective September 30, 2015 Fountainhead elected to take all its retainer in Common Stock.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following is a summary
of the compensation we paid for each of the last two years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively (i) to the persons who
acted as our principal executive officer during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and (ii) to the person who acted as our
next most highly compensated executive officer other than our principal executive officer who was serving as an executive officer
as of the end of our last fiscal year.
Name and
Principal
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
|
|
|
Non-
Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
|
|
|
All other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Peter Zachariou
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
CEO
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
David Cantor
|
|
2014
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
President
|
|
2015
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
OUTSTANDING EQUITY
AWARDS
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
|
|
Option Awards
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options (#)
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable (1)
|
|
|
Option
Exercise Price
($)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration Date
|
Kenneth T. Coviello
|
|
2/15/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
$
|
20.25
|
|
|
2/12/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heather N. Vinas
|
|
2/15/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,223
|
|
|
$
|
20.25
|
|
|
2/12/2018
|
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
Plan category
|
|
Number of
securities
to be issued
upon
exercise of outstanding
options,
warrants and rights
(a)
|
|
|
Weighted-
average
exercise price of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
|
|
|
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
6,667
|
|
|
$
|
20.25
|
|
|
|
17,676
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
3,333
|
|
|
|
28.50
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
20.70
|
|
|
|
17,676
|
|
(1) As of December 31, 2015
Warrants Issued to Management
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Exercisable
Warrants
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Exercisable
Warrants
|
|
|
Warrant
Exercise Price
($)
|
|
|
Warrant
Expiration
Date
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreements
Effective September 30,
2010, the Company entered into virtually identical employment agreements with David Cantor to serve as the Company’s Interim
President and Peter C. Zachariou to serve as the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer. Each employment agreement continued
until August 30, 2011 and was then automatically extended unless terminated by either party, and provided that the executives receive
no compensation for services rendered under the agreements.
Effective January 2, 2014,
the Company entered into: amended employment agreements with Peter Zachariou and David Cantor to serve as the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and President respectively; and an employment agreement with Adrian Liddell to serve as the Company’s Chief
Financial Officer. Each agreement continues for a period of twelve months from the date of the Initial Closing or until the appointment
of a replacement (with agreed transition periods) and is then automatically extended unless terminated by either party. The agreements
provide for no monthly compensation to be payable, but a deferred compensation payable of $110,000 for each individual, subject
to certain conditions being met. The compensation will be payable in cash or Restricted Shares of the Company’s Common Stock.
Compensation of Directors
During 2015 the Company
adopted a Deferred Compensation Plan for directors whereby the directors may defer their director’s compensation to the January
15th following the termination of their service as a director. The Deferred Compensation Plan came into effect on January 1, 2016.
During the period January 1, 2016 through September 29, 2016, we granted Steven Girgenti, Oscar Bronsther, M.D. and Lowell Rush
a total of 30,001, 21,145 and 21,145 shares of the Company’s Common Stock respectively for their service to the Board of
Directors under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Each of Mr. Girgenti, Dr. Bronsther and Mr. Rush are entitled to receive $7,000
in cash or stock at the option of the company per quarter. No other directors of the Company receive compensation for their service
to the Company other than as disclosed under
Employment Agreements
above.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets
forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our voting securities by (i) any person or group owning more
than 5% of any class of voting securities, (ii) each director, (iii) our chief executive officer and president and (iv) all executive
officers and directors as a group as of September 29, 2016. Unless noted, the address for the following beneficial owners and management
is 6401 Congress Ave., Suite 140, Boca Raton, FL 33487.
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Beneficial Owner
(1)
|
|
|
Class
(2)
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Steven Girgenti
|
|
|
79,801
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Oscar Bronsther, M.D
|
|
|
61,300
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Lowell Rush
|
|
|
49,337
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Pascale Mangiardi
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Common Stock
|
|
Adrian Liddell
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
%
|
Common Stock
|
|
David Cantor
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
1.94
|
%
|
Common Stock
|
|
Peter Zachariou
|
|
|
431,239
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
%
|
Series D Preferred
|
|
Peter Zachariou
|
|
|
69,487
|
|
|
|
25.71
|
%
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
All executive officers and
|
|
|
1,061,677
|
|
|
|
8.80
|
%
|
|
|
directors as a group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred
|
|
All executive officers and
|
|
|
69,487
|
|
|
|
25.71
|
%
|
Stock
|
|
directors as a group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Fountainhead Capital
|
|
|
6,497,818
|
|
|
|
49.36
|
%
|
|
|
Management Limited Portman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
House Hue Street, St. Helier,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jersey JB4 5RP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock
|
|
Fountainhead Capital Management Limited Portman House Hue Street, St. Helier, Jersey JB4 5RP
|
|
|
188,363
|
|
|
|
69.69
|
%
|
* Less than 1%
(1)
|
In determining beneficial ownership of our Common Stock and Series D Preferred Stock, the number of shares shown includes shares which the beneficial owner may acquire upon exercise of debentures, warrants and options which may be acquired within 60 days. In determining the percent of Common Stock or Series D Preferred Stock owned by a person or entity on September 29, 2016, (a) the numerator is the number of shares of the class beneficially owned by such person or entity, including shares which the beneficial ownership may acquire within 60 days of exercise of debentures, warrants and options, and (b) the denominator is the sum of (i) the total shares of that class outstanding on September 29, 2016 (11,116,077 shares of Common Stock, one share of Series C Preferred Stock and 270,306 shares of Series D Preferred Stock) and (ii) the total number of shares that the beneficial owner may acquire upon exercise of the debentures, warrants and options. Unless otherwise stated, each beneficial owner has sole power to vote and dispose of its shares.
|
|
|
(2)
|
In addition, in determining the percent of common stock owned by a person or entity on September 29, 2016, (a) the numerator is the number of shares of the class beneficially owned by such person and includes shares which the beneficial owner may acquire within 60 days upon conversion or exercise of a derivative security, and (b) the denominator is the sum of (i) the shares of that class outstanding on September 29, 2016 (11,116,077 shares of Common Stock, one share of Series C Preferred Stock and 270,306 shares of Series D Preferred Stock) and (ii) the total number of shares that the beneficial owner may acquire upon conversion or exercise of a derivative security within such 60 day period. Unless otherwise stated, each beneficial owner has sole power to vote and dispose of the shares.
|
TRANSACTIONS
WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS
AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Related Party Transactions
2014 Private Placement Offering
Under the terms of the Offering, there were
certain agreements with Related Parties:
(a)
Debt Amendment
and Repayment
. Fountainhead and Peter Zachariou agreed to extend the maturity of all of the Company’s debt obligations
due to them as of August 9, 2013 (aggregating $2,247,037) to January 2, 2017, subject to the earlier repayment of such debt upon
the occurrence of certain specified conditions. Fountainhead and Peter Zachariou further released all security interests associated
with any of the obligations and agreed to forebear declaring any event of default under the obligations for a period of 24 months
following the date of the Initial Closing. During January and February 2014, also under the terms of the Offering, debt obligations
arising since August 9, 2013 were repaid as follows: Fountainhead - $91,519; Peter Zachariou - $20,000; David Cantor -
$15,000.
(b)
Employment of Chief
Executive Officer and Employment Agreements.
Effective as of January 2, 2014, our board of directors appointed Peter C. Zachariou,
our Executive Vice President, to the additional role as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Also effective as of the January
2, 2014 the Company entered into separate, but largely identical Employment Agreements with Mr. Zachariou, Adrian Liddell and David
Cantor. Mr. Zachariou’s Employment Agreement commences on the Effective Date and terminates six months following the appointment
of a successor Chief Executive Officer; Mr. Liddell’s Employment Agreement commences on the Effective Date and terminates
upon the appointment of a successor Chief Financial Officer; and Mr. Cantor’s Employment Agreement commences on the Effective
Date and terminates upon the appointment of a successor. The aforementioned Employment Agreements provide for annual compensation
of $110,000, payment of which is deferred for 12 months from the Effective Date and is subject to the achievement of certain enumerated
milestone conditions. Each of these Employment Agreements supersede any prior employment agreements or arrangements between the
respective parties.
(c)
Amendment to Consulting
Agreement.
Effective as of January 2, 2014, the Company and Fountainhead amended their Consulting Agreement to extend the term
of the Consulting Agreement to January 2, 2015. As of January 2014, the monthly retainer payable to Fountainhead was reduced to
$10,000 per month, payable $5,000 in cash and the remainder payable in Company Common Stock at the end of each quarter until the
occurrence of specified milestones.
(d)
Conversion Agreement.
Effective as of January 2, 2014, the Company and Fountainhead entered into a Conversion Agreement whereby Fountainhead agreed to
convert all amounts accrued as of the date of the Initial Closing into an investment in that amount in the Offering. Pursuant to
the terms of this agreement, Fountainhead converted $1,426,542 of accrued consulting fees into the Units.
Other Related Party Transactions
During the period January 2015 to September
29, 2016, in accordance with the terms the Consulting Agreement, the Company issued 100,002 shares of Common Stock (valued at $180,000)
and made cash fee payments of $30,000 to Fountainhead.
On August 5, 2014, the Company entered into
a series of agreements with Fountainhead, along with certain other related and non- related parties (together, the “Fountainhead
Parties”), to exchange all of the parties’ $2,355,587 of debt into an equivalent amount of Company preferred equity.
Under the terms of the exchange, the Fountainhead Parties received 235,590 of newly-issued Company Series D Convertible Preferred
shares (“Series D”) that are convertible into Company Common Shares at a price of $2.15. The Series D carry a cumulative
preferred dividend of 7% per annum, payable in cash or Series D at the Company’s option. On the second (2nd) anniversary
of the date of issuance of the Series D, the dividend rate is increased to 12% per annum. The Company is able to redeem the Series
D at par at any time, at its sole option. The Fountainhead Parties will receive a number of warrants equivalent to 75% of the Company
Common Shares issuable on conversion of the Series D, exercisable at $3.08 per share for a period of three (3) years from the date
of issuance. If the Series D has not then been redeemed or converted within three years from date of issuance, the Fountainhead
Parties will receive additional warrants equivalent to 50% of the shares of the Company Common Shares issuable on conversion of
the Series D that they then hold, exercisable at the then market price.
At the same time, in a transaction not related
to the aforementioned exchange of securities, Fountainhead entered into an agreement with the Company preventing Fountainhead from
selling any Company Common Shares currently held by Fountainhead below $4.50 per share. In return, the Company agreed to extend
the life of certain of Fountainhead’s existing warrants expiring in 2015 to the expiration date as the warrants being issued
under the exchange.
During the period February 2015 to August 2016
the Company paid an aggregate of 33,146 shares of Preferred D Stock, valued at $331,490, representing preferred stock dividends,
to related parties. The Preferred D shares are convertible on their terms at $2.15 per share of Common Stock into 154,167 shares
During the period ended June 30, 2016, the
Company issued unsecured loan notes to Fountainhead for a total of $140,000. The loan notes bear interest at a rate of 10% and
are due on demand or by their one-year anniversary.
During the period ended June 30, 2016, the
Company issued unsecured loan notes to Peter Zachariou for a total of $45,000. The loan notes bear interest at a rate of 10% and
are due on demand or by their one-year anniversary
There were no other related party transactions
during the year ended December 31, 2015 or the subsequent period through October 5, 2016.
Director Independence
As of September 1, 2015, of our seven (7) directors,
Steven Girgenti, Oscar Bronsther, Lowell Rush and Pascale Mangiardi are considered “independent” in accordance with
Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. The remaining three (3) directors are not considered “independent”.
Therefore a majority of the board is independent.
EXPERTS
Our financial statements
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 along with the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity and cash flows in this prospectus have been audited by Paritz & Co., P.C., of Hackensack, New Jersey,
independent registered public accounting firm, to the extent and for the periods set forth in their report, and are set forth in
this prospectus in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of them as experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Our filings are available to the public at
the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference
Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Further information on the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the
SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
We have filed a registration statement on Form
S-1 with the SEC under the Securities Act for the common stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus does not contain all
of the information set forth in the registration statement, certain parts of which have been omitted in accordance with the rules
and regulations of the SEC. For further information, reference is made to the registration statement and its exhibits. Whenever
we make references in this prospectus to any of our contracts, agreements or other documents, the references are not necessarily
complete and you should refer to the exhibits attached to the registration statement for the copies of the actual contract, agreement
or other document.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN MATERIAL BY REFERENCE
The Company does not elect to incorporate any
material by reference.
DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION
FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s
Policy on Indemnification
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities
arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers, and controlling persons of the company pursuant
to any provisions contained in its Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that, in the
opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense
of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities
being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of registrant’s legal counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether indemnification is against public policy
as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our consolidated financial
statements are included with this prospectus. These financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States and are expressed in US dollars.
Index to Financial Statements
Fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and December
31, 2014 (audited)
Three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and
June 30, 2015 (unaudited).
Paritz
& Company, P.A.
|
15
Warren Street, Suite 25
Hackensack,
New Jersey 07601
(201)342-7753
Fax:
(201) 342-7598
E-Mail:
paritz @paritz.com
|
Certified
Public Accountants
|
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the Members of the Audit Committee and
Board
of directors of Vycor Medical, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We
have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Vycor Medical, Inc. and Subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of December
31, 2015 and 2014, and the related statements of comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each
of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2015. The Company’s management is responsible for these financial
statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Vycor
Medical, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each
of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
The
accompanying financial statements referred to above have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.
The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon, among other things, its successful execution of its
plan of operations and ability to raise additional financing. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to raise additional
capital or sell any of its products or services at a profit. As discussed in note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has
incurred a net loss since inception, including a net loss of $2,082,643 for the year ended December 31, 2015 and the Company expect
to continue to incur additional losses in the future, including additional development cost, cost related to marketing and manufacturing
expenses. The Company has incurred negative cash flows from operations since inception. As of December 31, 2015, the Company has
stockholders’ equity of $1,145,722 and cash and cash equivalents of $347,477. The Company believes it would not have enough
cash to meet its needs unless the Company is able to obtain additional cash from the issuance of debt or equity securities. These
factors, among others, raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty
/s/ Paritz & Company, P.A.
|
|
Hackensack,
New Jersey
March
29, 2016
VYCOR MEDICAL,
INC.
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
347,477
|
|
|
$
|
1,891,658
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,711 and $2,721
|
|
|
106,340
|
|
|
|
123,815
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
292,538
|
|
|
|
336,021
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
112,338
|
|
|
|
217,800
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
858,693
|
|
|
|
2,569,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets, net
|
|
|
521,105
|
|
|
|
582,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible and Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
251,157
|
|
|
|
251,157
|
|
Patents, net of accumulated amortization
|
|
|
323,138
|
|
|
|
345,113
|
|
Website, net of accumulated amortization
|
|
|
19,548
|
|
|
|
12,576
|
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
49,090
|
|
|
|
53,169
|
|
Total Intangible and Other assets
|
|
|
642,933
|
|
|
|
662,015
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
2,022,731
|
|
|
$
|
3,813,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
250,367
|
|
|
$
|
221,703
|
|
Accrued interest: Other
|
|
|
88,634
|
|
|
|
40,634
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
222,258
|
|
|
|
320,927
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,792
|
|
Notes payable: Other
|
|
|
315,750
|
|
|
|
321,785
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
877,009
|
|
|
|
924,841
|
|
|
|
|
-18,316
|
|
|
|
1,644,453
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 252,336 and 235,560 issued and outstanding as at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 respectively
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2015 and 2014, 11,032,560 and 10,879,899 shares issued and 10,929,226 and 10,776,565 outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014 respectively
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
|
24,346,057
|
|
|
|
23,903,793
|
|
Treasury Stock (103,334 shares of Common Stock as at December 31, 2015 and 2014 respectively, at cost)
|
|
|
-1,033
|
|
|
|
-1,033
|
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
|
|
(23,332,538
|
)
|
|
|
(21,082,118
|
)
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
132,108
|
|
|
|
67,148
|
|
Total Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
1,145,722
|
|
|
|
2,888,902
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
$
|
2,022,731
|
|
|
$
|
3,813,743
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial
statements
VYCOR MEDICAL, INC.
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Loss
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,138,634
|
|
|
$
|
1,250,292
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
|
|
164,118
|
|
|
|
156,300
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
974,516
|
|
|
|
1,093,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
71,512
|
|
|
|
69,114
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
360,334
|
|
|
|
368,605
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,533,684
|
|
|
|
3,388,421
|
|
Total Operating expenses
|
|
|
2,965,530
|
|
|
|
3,826,140
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(1,991,014
|
)
|
|
|
(2,732,148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: Related Party
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(80,093
|
)
|
Interest expense: Other
|
|
|
(47,710
|
)
|
|
|
(50,627
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on foreign currency exchange
|
|
|
(63,711
|
)
|
|
|
(105,685
|
)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(682,039
|
)
|
Loss on extension of warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(146,488
|
)
|
Change in fair value derivative liability
|
|
|
19,792
|
|
|
|
(252,633
|
)
|
Total Other Income (expense)
|
|
|
(91,629
|
)
|
|
|
(1,317,565
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Before Credit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
(2,082,643
|
)
|
|
|
(4,049,713
|
)
|
Credit for income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
(2,082,643
|
)
|
|
|
(4,049,713
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(167,777
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net Loss available to common shareholders
|
|
|
(2,250,420
|
)
|
|
|
(4,049,713
|
)
|
Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
(64,959
|
)
|
|
|
(112,318
|
)
|
Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
(2,315,379
|
)
|
|
|
(4,162,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding – Basic and Diluted
|
|
|
10,839,335
|
|
|
|
10,270,657
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial
statements
Vycor Medical, Inc.
Statement of Stockholders’
Equity (Deficiency)
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Preferred - Series C
|
|
|
Preferred-Series D
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Add’l Paid-in
|
|
|
Accum
|
|
|
Accum OCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Defecit
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2014
|
|
|
6,757,225
|
|
|
$
|
675
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
(103,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,762,689
|
|
|
$
|
(17,032,405
|
)
|
|
$
|
(45,170
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,315,243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock for board and consulting fees
|
|
|
131,505
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
292,507
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
292,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation for consulting services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,522
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of shares and warrants pursuant to offering
|
|
|
2,777,808
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,387,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,387,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares issued in exchange for debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,559
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,037,602
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,037,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revaluation of warrants on extension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,488
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
146,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issuance for conversion of preferred shares
|
|
|
420,838
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(162,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162,017
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issuance for accrued consulting fees
|
|
|
792,523
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,097,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,097,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of derivative liability to equity
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,336,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,336,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
112,318
|
|
|
|
112,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for year ended December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,049,713
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,049,713
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2014
|
|
|
10,879,899
|
|
|
$
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
235,559
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
(103,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,903,793
|
|
|
$
|
(21,082,118
|
)
|
|
$
|
67,148
|
|
|
$
|
2,888,902
|
|
Issuance of stock for board and consulting fees
|
|
|
152,661
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
244,985
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
245,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation for consulting service
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,492
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation issued to employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,011
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,777
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,776
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
167,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
64,960
|
|
|
|
64,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for year ended December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,250,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,250,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
11,032,560
|
|
|
$
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
252,336
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
(103,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,346,057
|
|
|
($
|
23,332,538
|
)
|
|
$
|
132,108
|
|
|
$
|
1,145,722
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial
statements
VYCOR MEDICAL, INC.
Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
For the year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(2,082,643
|
)
|
|
|
(4,049,713
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
99,291
|
|
|
|
128,381
|
|
Depreciation of fixed assets
|
|
|
269,672
|
|
|
|
254,608
|
|
Inventory provision
|
|
|
12,633
|
|
|
|
2,567
|
|
Inventory write-off
|
|
|
20,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
274,502
|
|
|
|
376,662
|
|
(Gain) loss on foreign exchange
|
|
|
63,711
|
|
|
|
105,685
|
|
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
(19,792
|
)
|
|
|
252,633
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
682,039
|
|
Loss on extension of warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
146,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
17,475
|
|
|
|
88,845
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
10,046
|
|
|
|
(131,663
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
184,726
|
|
|
|
(88,356
|
)
|
Accrued interest to related party
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(255,034
|
)
|
Accrued interest other
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
(90,617
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
28,665
|
|
|
|
(32,321
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(98,669
|
)
|
|
|
(90,973
|
)
|
Security Deposit
|
|
|
4,079
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(1,167,500
|
)
|
|
|
(2,700,769
|
)
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of fixed assets
|
|
|
(210,023
|
)
|
|
|
(130,845
|
)
|
Purchase of website
|
|
|
(18,010
|
)
|
|
|
(13,842
|
)
|
Acquisition of patents
|
|
|
(66,276
|
)
|
|
|
(26,455
|
)
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(294,309
|
)
|
|
|
(171,142
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of Common stock and Warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of Notes Payable: Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
83,486
|
|
Repayment of Notes Payable to Related Party
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(126,519
|
)
|
Repayment of Notes Payable - Other
|
|
|
(85,300
|
)
|
|
|
(231,337
|
)
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(85,300
|
)
|
|
|
4,725,630
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
6,636
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(1,544,181
|
)
|
|
|
1,860,355
|
|
Cash at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,891,658
|
|
|
|
31,303
|
|
Cash at end of year
|
|
|
347,477
|
|
|
|
1,891,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid:
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
462,194
|
|
Non-Cash Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends satisfied in new preferred stock
|
|
$
|
167,777
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial
statements
1.
FORMATION AND BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Business Description
Vycor Medical, Inc. (the “Company”)
designs, develops and markets neurological medical devices and therapies through two operating divisions: Vycor Medical and NovaVision.
Vycor Medical focuses on brain and cervical surgical access systems for sale to hospitals and medical professionals; NovaVision
focuses on neuro-stimulation therapies and diagnostic devices for the treatment and screening of vision field loss resulting from
neurological damage.
2.
GOING CONCERN
The Company’s financial statements
have been presented on a basis that contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course
of business and assumes the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred losses since its inception, including
a net loss of $2,082,643 for the year ended December 31, 2015, and the Company expects to continue to incur additional losses in
the future, including additional development costs, costs related to marketing and manufacturing expenses. The Company has incurred
negative cash flows from operations since inception. As of December 31, 2015 the Company had a stockholders’ equity of $1,145,722
and cash and cash equivalents of $347,477. The Company believes it would not have enough cash to meet its various cash needs unless
the Company is able to obtain additional cash from the issuance of debt or equity securities. There is no assurance that additional
funds from the issuance of equity will be available for the Company to finance its operations on acceptable terms. If adequate
funds are not available, the Company may have to delay development or commercialization of products or technologies that the Company
would otherwise seek to commercialize, or cease some or all of its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the
possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that
may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
3.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Vycor Medical, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, NovaVision, Inc. (a Delaware corporation), NovaVision
GmbH (a German corporation) and Sight Science Limited (a UK corporation), both wholly owned subsidiaries of NovaVision, Inc. The
Company is headquartered in Boca Raton, FL. All material inter-company accounts, transactions, and balances have been eliminated
in consolidation. Certain reclassifications and format changes have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year
presentation.
Revenue Recognition
Vycor Medical generates revenue
from the sale of its surgical access system to hospitals and other medical professionals. Vycor Medical records revenue when a
completed contract for the sale exists, the product is invoiced and shipped to the customer. Vycor Medical does not provide for
product returns or warranty costs.
NovaVision generates revenues from
various programs, therapy services and other sources such as license sales. Therapy services revenues represent fees from NovaVision’s
vision restoration therapy software, eye movement training software, diagnostic software, clinic set up and training fees, and
the professional and support services associated with the therapy. NovaVision provides vision restoration therapy directly to patients.
The typical vision restoration therapy consists of six modules, performed on average over 6 months in the U.S. and U.K. and 10
months in Germany. A patient contract comprises set-up fees and monthly therapy fees. Set-up fees are recognized at the outset
of the contract and therapy revenue is recognized ratably over the therapy period. Patient therapy is restricted to being completed
by a patient within a specified time frame. NovaVision’s saccadic training software is generally completed within 2-4 weeks
and revenue is therefore recognized fully at commencement.
Deferred revenue results from patients
paying for the therapy in advance of receiving the therapy.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company maintains cash balances
at various financial institutions. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to
$250,000. Cash balances may at times exceed the FDIC insured limits. Cash also includes a US investment account in a money market
backed by government securities up to 105% of the account balance. The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity
of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Included within cash are deposits paid by patients, held by the
Company until the patient returns the VRT device or chinrest at the end of therapy. At December 31, 2015 and 2014 patient deposits
amounted to $27,183 and $32,869, respectively, and are included in Other Current Liabilities.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts Receivable
We have a policy of reserving for
uncollectible accounts based on our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable.
We extend credit to our customers based on an evaluation of their financial condition and other factors. We generally do not require
collateral or other security to support accounts receivable. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintain
an allowance for potential bad debts if required. We determine whether an allowance for doubtful accounts is required by evaluating
specific accounts where information indicates the customers may have an inability to meet financial obligations. In these cases,
we use assumptions and judgment, based on the best available facts and circumstances, to record a specific allowance for those
customers against amounts due to reduce the receivable to the amount expected to be collected. These specific allowances are re-evaluated
and adjusted as additional information is received. The amounts calculated are analyzed to determine the total amount of the allowance.
We may also record a general allowance as necessary. Direct write-offs are taken in the period when we have exhausted our efforts
to collect overdue and unpaid receivables or otherwise evaluate other circumstances that indicate that we should abandon such efforts.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower
of cost determined using the weighted average cost method or market. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price, in the
ordinary course of business, less estimated costs to complete and dispose of the product. If the Company identifies excess, obsolete
or unsalable items, its inventories are written down to their realizable value in the period in which the impairment is first identified.
The provision for inventory obsolescence for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $12,633 and $2,567, respectively. Shipping
and handling costs incurred for inventory purchases and product shipments are recorded in cost of sales in the Company’s
consolidated statements of operations.
Foreign Currency
The Euro is the local currency of
the country in which NovaVision GmbH conducts its operations and is considered the functional currency of this entity; the GB Pound
is the local currency of the country in which Sight Science Limited conducts its operations and is considered the functional currency
of this entity. All balance sheet amounts are translated to U.S. dollars using the U.S. exchange rate at the balance sheet date
except for the equity section which is translated at historical rates. Operating statement amounts are translated using an average
exchange rate for the period of operations. Foreign currency translation effects are accumulated as part of the accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and included in stockholders’ equity in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Educational marketing and
advertising expenses
The Company may incur costs for
the education of customers on the uses and benefits of its products. The Company will include education, marketing and advertising
expense as a component of selling, general and administrative costs as such costs are incurred.
Income taxes
We use the asset and liability method
of accounting for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.” Under this method, income tax expense
is recognized for the amount of: (i) taxes payable or refundable for the current year and (ii) deferred tax consequences of temporary
differences resulting from matters that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in
tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided
to reduce the deferred tax assets reported if based on the weight of the available positive and negative evidence, it is more likely
than not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
ASC Topic 740.10.30 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740.10.40 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. We have no material uncertain tax positions for any of the reporting periods presented.
Fixed assets
Fixed assets are stated at cost
less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided for on a straight-line basis over the useful lives of the assets. Expenditures
for additions and improvements are capitalized; repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Derivative Liability
The Company has accounted for the
34,723 Series A Warrants issued in connection with the 2014 Offering (all as defined in Note 10), the holders of which had not
waived their anti-dilution rights (as detailed further in Note 10) in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40-15-7D,
whereby under that provision, because they had anti-dilution rights, they did not meet the criteria for equity treatment and must
be recorded as a liability. Accordingly, the Company classified the warrant instrument as a liability at its fair value and adjusted
the instrument to fair value at each reporting period. This liability was subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date
until exercised or until the anti-dilution provisions contained within the warrant agreements expired, and was classified in the
balance sheet as a current liability. Any change in fair value of the warrant liability was recognized in the Company’s statement
of operations as other income (loss). The anti-dilution provisions expired on June 11, 2015 and accordingly the liability has been
extinguished.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for
impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. For assets that are to be held and
used, impairment is recognized when the estimated undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset or group of assets is less
than their carrying value. If impairment exists, an adjustment is made to write the asset down to its fair value, and a loss is
recorded as the difference between the carrying value and fair value. Fair values are determined based on quoted market values,
discounted cash flows or internal and external appraisals, as applicable. Assets to be disposed of are carried at the lower of
carrying value or estimated net realizable value.
Research and Development
The Company expenses all research
and development costs as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the amounts charged to research and development
expenses were $71,512 and $69,114, respectively.
Software Development Costs
The Company accounts for software
development costs in accordance with ASC 350-40, whereby all costs incurred during the preliminary stage of a development project
should be charged to expense as incurred. Capitalization of costs begins after the preliminary stage has been completed, management
commits to funding the project, it is probable that the project will be completed, and the software will be used for its intended
function. All post-implementation costs are charged to expense as incurred. Accordingly, direct internal and external costs associated
with the development of the features and functionality of the Company’s software, incurred during the application development
stage, are capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method of the estimated life of five years. The Company acquired internally
developed software valued at $540,000 as part of the acquisition of the assets of NovaVision, Inc. on November 30, 2010 and $363,472
as part of the acquisition of the assets of Sight Science Limited on January 4, 2012. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and
2014, the amounts capitalized for software development were $32,843 and $124,660 respectively, for the Company’s VRT 7.0
and NeuroEyeCoach programs.
Uses of estimates in the preparation
of financial statements
The preparation of consolidated
financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimated. To the extent
management’s estimates prove to be incorrect, financial results for future periods may be adversely affected. Significant
estimates and assumptions contained in the accompanying consolidated financial statements include management’s estimate of
the allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable, amortization of intangible assets, and the fair values of options and warrants
included in the determination of debt discounts and share based compensation.
Stock Compensation
The Company recognizes the cost
of all share-based payments under the relevant authoritative accounting guidance. Share-based payments include any remuneration
paid by the Company in shares of the Company’s common stock or financial instruments that grant the recipient the right to
acquire shares of the Company’s common stock. For share-based payments to employees, which consist only of awards made under
the stock option plan described below, the Company accounts for the payments in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 718,
“Stock Compensation”. Share-based payments to consultants, service providers and other non-employees are accounted
for under in accordance with ASC Topic 718, ASC Topic 505, “Equity Payments to Non-Employees” or other applicable authoritative
guidance.
Convertible Instruments
We evaluate and account for conversion
options embedded in convertible instruments in accordance with ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging Activities”.
Applicable GAAP requires companies
to bifurcate conversion options from their host instruments and account for them as free standing derivative financial instruments
according to certain criteria. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded
derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract, (b) the
hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured at fair value
under other GAAP with changes in fair value reported in earnings as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms
as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative instrument.
We account for convertible instruments
(when we have determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments) as follows:
We record when necessary, discounts to convertible notes for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in debt instruments
based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction
and the effective conversion price embedded in the note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of
the related debt to their stated date of redemption. The embedded conversion option in connection with our convertible debt could
not be exercised unless and until we completed a Qualifying Financing transaction. Accordingly, we determined based on authoritative
guidance that the embedded conversion option is deemed to be a contingent conversion rather than active conversion option that
did not require accounting recognition at the commitment dates of the issuances of the Notes.
Common Stock Purchase Warrants
and Other Derivative Financial Instruments
We classify as equity any contracts
that require physical settlement or net-share settlement or provide us a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in our own
shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement) provided that such contracts are indexed to our own stock as defined in ASC
815-40 (“Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity”). We classify as assets or liabilities any contracts that require
net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside our
control) or give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).
We assess classification of our common stock purchase warrants and other free standing derivatives at each reporting date to determine
whether a change in classification between assets and liabilities is required.
Fair Value Measurements
We adopted the provisions of ASC
Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which defines fair value as used in numerous accounting pronouncements,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements.
The estimated fair value of certain
financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses are carried
at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying
amounts of our short and long term credit obligations approximate fair value because the effective yields on these obligations,
which include contractual interest rates taken together with other features such as concurrent issuances of warrants and/or embedded
conversion options, are comparable to rates of returns for instruments of similar credit risk.
ASC 820 defines fair value as the
exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous
market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes
a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 — quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 — quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable
Level 3 — inputs that are
unobservable (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)
Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per share is computed
by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share
is computed giving effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common
shares consist of incremental shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants and conversion of preferred stock and
convertible debt. Such potentially dilutive shares are excluded when the effect would be to reduce a net loss per share. No dilution
adjustment has been made to the weighted average outstanding common shares in the periods presented because the assumed exercise
of outstanding options and warrants and the conversion of preferred stock and debt would be anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the
potential shares of common stock that are not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share:
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
Stock options outstanding™
|
|
|
25,557
|
|
|
|
25,557
|
|
Warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
6,007,048
|
|
|
|
5,911,715
|
|
Debentures convertible into common stock
|
|
|
215,908
|
|
|
|
171,138
|
|
Preferred shares convertible into common stock
|
|
|
1,188,471
|
|
|
|
1,110,438
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,436,983
|
|
|
|
7,218,848
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time new accounting
pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other standard setting bodies that may have an impact
on the Company’s accounting and reporting. The Company believes that such recently issued accounting pronouncements and other
authoritative guidance for which the effective date is in the future will not have an impact on its accounting or reporting or
that such impact will not be material to its financial position, results of operations and cash flows when implemented.
4.
NOTES PAYABLE
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014
Other Notes Payable consists of:
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
On March 25, 2011 the Company issued a term note for $300,000 to EuroAmerican Investment Corp. (“EuroAmerican”). The term note bears interest at 16% per annum and was due June 25, 2011. In connection with the loan the Company also issued EuroAmerican warrants to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share for a period of three (3) years. On June 25, 2011 the due date for this note was extended to September 25, 2011 and the Holder was granted the right to convert all or any amount of the principal face amount of the debenture then outstanding and accrued interest into shares of common stock of the Company an adjusted conversion price of $1.80 per share, subject to adjustment and does not require bifurcation. The due date for this note has been extended to December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance policy finance agreements. During the period ended December 31, 2015 the Company made payments of $85,800. The notes are due over the next twelve months.
|
|
|
15,750
|
|
|
21,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Notes Payable
|
|
|
315,750
|
|
|
321,786
|
|
5.
SEGMENT REPORTING, GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
(a) Business segments
The Company operates in two business segments: Vycor
Medical, which focuses on devices for neurosurgery; and NovaVision, which focuses on neuro stimulation therapies and diagnostic
devices for the treatment and screening of vision field loss. Set out below are the revenues, gross profits and total assets for
each segment.
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
333,085
|
|
|
$
|
221,258
|
|
|
$
|
682,006
|
|
|
$
|
480,107
|
|
NovaVision
|
|
$
|
46,321
|
|
|
$
|
64,760
|
|
|
$
|
97,486
|
|
|
$
|
134,463
|
|
|
|
$
|
379,406
|
|
|
$
|
286,018
|
|
|
$
|
779,492
|
|
|
$
|
614,570
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
288,812
|
|
|
$
|
193,743
|
|
|
$
|
575,420
|
|
|
$
|
412,794
|
|
NovaVision
|
|
$
|
42,508
|
|
|
$
|
58,294
|
|
|
$
|
88,747
|
|
|
$
|
116,102
|
|
|
|
$
|
331,320
|
|
|
$
|
252,037
|
|
|
$
|
664,167
|
|
|
$
|
528,896
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Total Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
911,025
|
|
|
$
|
1,150,291
|
|
NovaVision
|
|
|
771,214
|
|
|
|
872,440
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,682,239
|
|
|
$
|
2,022,731
|
|
(b) Geographic information. The
Company operates in two geographic segments, the United States and Europe. Set out below are the revenues, gross profits and total
assets for each segment.
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
356,170
|
|
|
$
|
248,059
|
|
|
$
|
728,476
|
|
|
$
|
531,998
|
|
Europe
|
|
$
|
23,236
|
|
|
$
|
37,959
|
|
|
$
|
51,016
|
|
|
$
|
82,572
|
|
|
|
$
|
379,406
|
|
|
$
|
286,018
|
|
|
$
|
779,492
|
|
|
$
|
614,570
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
309,318
|
|
|
$
|
217,977
|
|
|
$
|
616,556
|
|
|
$
|
456,328
|
|
Europe
|
|
$
|
22,002
|
|
|
$
|
34,060
|
|
|
$
|
47,611
|
|
|
$
|
72,568
|
|
|
|
$
|
331,320
|
|
|
$
|
252,037
|
|
|
$
|
664,167
|
|
|
$
|
528,896
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Total Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,399,124
|
|
|
$
|
1,699,589
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
283,115
|
|
|
|
323,142
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,682,239
|
|
|
$
|
2,022,731
|
|
6.
FIXED ASSETS
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014,
Fixed Assets and the estimated lives used in the computation of depreciation are as follows:
Depreciation expense for the years
ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $269,672 and $254,608 respectively, including $8,629 and $14,383 respectively for Therapy
Devices which is allocated to Cost of Sales.
|
|
Estimated Useful Lives
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
3 years
|
|
$
|
132,452
|
|
$
|
136,356
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
6,206
|
|
|
6,206
|
|
Purchased Software
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
27,706
|
|
|
24,993
|
|
Molds and Tooling
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
381,397
|
|
|
234,230
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
26,028
|
|
|
20,079
|
|
Therapy Devices
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
99,324
|
|
|
86,286
|
|
Internally Developed Software
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
1,174,912
|
|
|
1,143,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,848,025
|
|
|
1,652,068
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
(1,326,920
|
)
|
|
(1,069,634
|
)
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
|
$
|
521,105
|
|
$
|
582,434
|
|
7.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014,
Intangible Assets consists of:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Amortized intangible assets: Patent (8 years useful life)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying Amount
|
|
$
|
865,639
|
|
|
$
|
799,362
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
(542,501
|
)
|
|
|
(454,249
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
323,138
|
|
|
$
|
345,113
|
|
Amortized intangible assets: Website (5 years useful life)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying Amount
|
|
$
|
50,760
|
|
|
$
|
32,750
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
$
|
(31,212
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,174
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
19,548
|
|
|
$
|
12,576
|
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
$
|
251,157
|
|
|
$
|
251,157
|
|
Intangible asset amortization expense
for the periods ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $99,291and $128,381, respectively.
8.
EQUITY
Equity Transactions
During January to December 2015,
the Company issued: 12,180 shares of Common Stock (valued at $20,000) to Steven Girgenti, 15,145 shares of Common Stock (valued
at $20,000) to Oscar Bronsther and 15,145 shares of Common Stock (valued at $20,000) to Lowell Rush in consideration for services
provided to the Board of Directors; and 5,023 shares of Common Stock (valued at $7,500) to Alvaro Pasual-Leone, 8,270 shares of
Common Stock (valued at $12,500) to Josef Zihl and 6,153 shares of Common Stock (valued at $7,500) to each of Jason Barton and
Jose Romano in respect of their roles as members of the NovaVision, Inc. Scientific Advisory Board.
During January to December 2015,
in accordance with the terms the Consulting Agreement, the Company issued 49,819 shares of Common Stock (valued at $90,000) to
Fountainhead.
During 2015, in accordance with
the terms of investor relations advisory agreements, the Company issued 27,779 shares of Common Stock (valued at $50,000) to Acorn
Partners, LLC and 6,994 shares of Common Stock (valued at $10,000) to Liolios Group Inc.
During 2015, Series D Preferred
Stock, convertible into shares of Common Stock at $2.15, was issued in respect of Preferred Dividends as follows: 11,691 shares
of Series D Preferred Stock (valued at $116,915), convertible into 54,377 shares of Common Stock to Fountainhead; 4,313 shares
of Series D Preferred Stock (valued at $43,130), convertible into 20,060 shares of Common Stock to Peter Zachariou; and 773 shares
of Series D Preferred Stock (valued at $7,731), convertible into 3,595 shares of Common Stock to Craig Kirsch.
Outstanding Warrants and Options
The details of the outstanding rights,
options and warrants and value of such rights, options and warrants are as follows:
STOCK WARRANTS:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
exercise
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
price
per share
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
|
|
|
1,404,599
|
|
|
$
|
3.39
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
5,226,120
|
|
|
$
|
2.61
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled or expired
|
|
|
(719,004
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.46
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
|
|
|
5,911,715
|
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.56
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled or expired
|
|
|
(4,667
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
6,007,048
|
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
STOCK OPTIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
exercise
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
price
per
share
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
|
|
|
5,557
|
|
|
$
|
20.25
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled or expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
|
|
|
5,557
|
|
|
$
|
20.25
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled or expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
25,557
|
|
|
$
|
5.97
|
|
As of December 31, 2015, the weighted-average
remaining contractual life of outstanding warrants and options is 1.25 and 2.18 years, respectively.
9.
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock Option Plan
Under ASC Topic 718, the Company
estimates the fair value of option awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model. The grant date fair value is recognized
over the option vesting period, the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. No
compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. Under these standards,
compensation cost for employee cost for employee stock-based awards is based on the estimated grant-date fair value and recognized
over the vesting period of the applicable award on a straight-line basis.
For the years ended December 31,
2015 and 2014, the Company recognized share-based compensation of $25,011 and $0, respectively for the issuance of stock options.
Stock appreciation rights may be granted either on a stand alone basis or in conjunction with all or part of any other stock options
granted under the plan. As of December 31, 2015 there were no awards of any stock appreciation rights.
The Company from time to time issues
common stock, stock options or common stock warrants to acquire services or goods from non-employees. Common stock, stock options
and common stock warrants issued to other than employees or directors are recorded on the basis of their fair value, which is measured
as of the “measurement date” using an option pricing model. The “measurement date” for options and warrants
related to contracts that have substantial disincentives to non-performance is the date of the contract, and for all other contracts
is the vesting date. Expense related to the options and warrants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the
period over which services are to be received or the life of the option or warrant.
Non-Employee Stock Compensation
Aggregate stock-based compensation
expense charged to operations for stock and warrants granted to the above non-employees for the year ended December 31, 2015 was
$249,492. As of December 31, 2015, there was $0 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to warrant and stock awards and
non-vested options.
Stock-based Compensation Valuation
Methodology
Stock-based compensation resulting
from the issuance of Common Stock is calculated by reference to the valuation of the Stock on the date of issuance, the expense
being recognized as the compensation is earned. Stock-based compensation expenses related to employee options and warrants granted
to non-employees are recognized as the stock options and warrants are earned. The fair value of the stock options or warrants granted
is estimated at the grant date, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and the expense is recognized on a straight-line
basis over the shorter of the period over which services are to be received or the life of the option or warrant. The grant date
fair value of employee share options and similar instruments is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the basis
of the fair value of the underlying common stock on the measurement date, adjusted for the unique characteristics of those equity
instruments, using the assumptions noted in the table below. The fair value of the common stock is determined by the then-prevailing
private placement purchase price. Expected volatility was based on the historical volatility of a peer group of publicly traded
companies. The expected term of options and warrants was based upon the life of the option, and the risk-free rate used was based
on the U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity rate.
The stock compensation expensed
during the year ended December 31, 2015 resulted only from the issuance of Common Stock valued on the date of issuance. The following
assumptions were used in calculations of the Black-Scholes option pricing model for warrant-based stock compensation in year ended
December 31, 2015:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
1.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
Expected life
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
101
|
%
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
Vycor Common Stock fair value
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
10.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company has adopted ASC 820
for its financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period. The adoption
of ASC 820 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Under the terms of the Offering,
during the period January 2 to April 25, 2014, in five separate closings, a total of 2,397,631 Series A Warrants and Placement
Agent Warrants were issued as part of the Offering, which carried anti-dilution rights. Effective May 15, 2014 these anti-dilution
rights were waived for all but 34,723 of the Series A Warrants and for all of the Placement Agent Warrants. The Company accounts
for the Series A Warrants in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40-15-7D, whereby under that provision, because
they have anti-dilution rights, they do not meet the criteria for equity treatment and must be recorded as a liability. Accordingly,
the Company classifies the warrant instrument as a liability at its fair value and adjusts the instrument to fair value at each
reporting period. The anti-dilution provisions expired on June 11, 2015 and accordingly the liability has been extinguished.
The following table presents information
about the Company’s liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (the Series A Warrants described above)
as of September 30, 2014 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs the Company utilized to determine such
fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical
liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable such as quoted prices, interest rates
and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the liability, and includes situations
where there is little, if any, market activity for the liability:
Description
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant Liability
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Description
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant Liability
|
|
$
|
19,792
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
19,792
|
|
The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances for the liabilities measured using fair significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
Balance at January 1, 2014
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Issuance of Series A Warrants and Placement Agent Warrants as part of Offering Units on January 2, January 31, February 24, February 28 and March 31, April 25, 2014
|
|
|
2,103,195
|
|
Change in fair value during period
|
|
|
252,633
|
|
Reclassification to equity from waiver of anti-dilution on May 15, 2014
|
|
|
(2,336,036
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
19,792
|
|
Change in fair value during period
|
|
|
(19,792
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The following assumptions were used in calculations of
the Monte Carlo Simulation model for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
0.56-.73%
|
|
|
|
0.58-0.93%
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
1.65 years
|
|
|
|
2.09 – 3.00 years
|
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
90-93%
|
|
|
|
71-97%
|
|
Vycor Common Stock fair value
|
|
|
$1.59-1.84
|
|
|
|
$1.79-$2.70
|
|
11. INCOME TAXES
Loss Before Taxes
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
1,706,722
|
|
|
$
|
3,646,424
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
375,921
|
|
|
|
403,289
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,082,643
|
|
|
$
|
4,049,713
|
|
The reconciliation of income tax expense at
the U.S. statutory rate of 35% in 2015 and 2014, to the Company’s effective tax rate is as follows:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
US statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(728,925
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,417,399
|
)
|
Tax difference between foreign and U.S.
|
|
|
28,528
|
|
|
|
28,909
|
|
Change in Valuation Allowance
|
|
$
|
(700,397
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,388,490
|
)
|
Tax Provision
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
The Company has incurred net operating losses
since inception. The Company has not reflected any tax benefit related to such net operating losses in the financial statements.
Prior to August 15, 2007 the Company was a limited liability company and losses were passed through to the individual members,
therefore the Company only has potential tax benefits from the date it became a ‘C’ corporation.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects
of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company and its subsidiaries’ deferred tax assets at December
31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
Operating loss carry-forward
|
|
$
|
5,600,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,800,000
|
|
Deferred tax asset before Valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
5,600,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,800,000
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
(5,600,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,800,000
|
)
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
In assessing the realization of deferred tax
assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income.
The authoritative guidance requires a valuation
allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets reported if, based on the weight of the evidence, it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Based on the level of historical taxable losses and projections
of future taxable income (losses) over the periods in which the deferred tax assets can be realized, management currently believes
that it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of these deductible differences. Accordingly, management
has determined that a 100% valuation allowance is appropriate at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
Net Operating Loss Carry-Forwards
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company
had U.S. accumulated losses for tax purposes of approximately $16,000,000 and $13,800,000 respectively, which may be carried forward
and offset against U.S. taxable income, and which expire during the tax years 2027 through 2032.
Federal tax laws impose significant restrictions
on the utilization of net operating loss carry-forwards and in the event of a change in ownership of the Company, as defined by
the Internal Revenue Code Section 382. The Company’s net operating loss carry-forwards may be subject to the above limitations.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company
had German accumulated losses for tax purposes of approximately $688,000 and $740,000 respectively, which may be carried forward
and offset against German taxable income subject to certain restrictions and limitations. Such carry-forwards are subject to certain
restrictions and limitations in the event of changes in the NovaVision GmbH’s ownership.
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company
had UK accumulated losses for tax purposes of approximately $199,000 and $180,000 respectively, which may be carried forward and
offset against UK taxable income subject to certain restrictions and limitations.
Tax Rates
The applicable US income tax rate for the Company
for both of the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was 35%. Non-US subsidiaries are taxed according to the tax laws in their
respective country of residence. The German applicable rate for both of the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was 31.58%;
the UK applicable rate for both the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was 20%.
US income taxes and foreign withholding taxes
were not provided for on undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries. The Company intends to reinvest these
earnings indefinitely in its foreign subsidiaries. If these earnings were distributed to US in the form of dividends or otherwise,
after the repayment of intercompany debt, the Company would be subject to additional US income taxes (subject to an adjustment
for foreign tax credits) and foreign withholding taxes.
Uncertain Tax Position
The Company has recorded no liability for income
taxes associated with unrecognized tax benefits at the date of adoption and has not recorded any liability associated with unrecognized
tax benefits during 2015 and 2014. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any interest or penalty in regard to any unrecognized
benefit.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease
The Company leases approximately 10,000 sq.
ft. located at 6401 Congress Ave., Suite 140, Boca Raton, FL 33487 from Catexor Limited Partnership for a gross rent of $14,260
plus sales tax per month. The term of the lease is 5 years and 6 months terminating July, 2017. The Company’s subsidiaries
in Germany and the UK occupy properties on short-term lease agreements. Rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
was $204,445 and $202,083 respectively
Potential German tax liability
In June 2012 the Company’s German subsidiary
received a preliminary assessment for Magdeburg City trade tax of approximately €75,000 (approximately $94,000). This assessment
is for the 2010 fiscal year and relates to the Company’s acquisition of the assets of the former NovaVision, Inc. An initial
assessment for corporate tax for the same period has been preliminarily reduced to zero. The Company has not accepted this trade
tax assessment and is in discussion with the relevant tax authorities with a view to its reduction. The tax authorities have agreed
to suspend the assessment pending the outcome of certain court hearings, and the Company has agreed to make limited monthly payments
on account. To the extent that this assessment (either a higher or a reduced amount) is ultimately confirmed by the tax authorities,
the Company believes it has a very strong claim against certain professional advisors which would offset the liability in full.
Accordingly, the Company has made no provision for this liability years ended December 31 2015 and 2014 respectively, other than
recording the monthly payments as an expense.
Potential China Patent Infringement
The Company was made aware in 2012 that a competitor
had been granted a patent for related technology, and appeared to be entering the market with products that infringe the Company’s
own issued patent. Following investigation, the Company initiated an invalidation of the competitor’s patent; in March 2014
the Patent Re-examination Board issued an Examination Decision invalidating all the claims of the competitor’s patent. The
competitor appealed the decision, but the Company has contested the appeal. A final decision on the appeal is pending. The Company
has, in the interim, also prepared to enforce its own patent against this competitor, however this competitor appears to have abandoned
its product offering, making an enforcement action moot for the time being. The Company has also been made aware that a second
competitor has filed a patent application for related technology and also may be producing a product that potentially infringes
the Company’s patent, and has filed documents with the State Intellectual Property Office opposing grant of the patent application.
As a general rule the Company intends to take all necessary action to protect its patent portfolio. As with all patent infringement
actions, there is some risk that the accused infringer will not be found to infringe the claims, and an additional risk that the
accused infringer will successfully challenge the validity of the asserted claims.
13. CONSULTING AND OTHER AGREEMENTS
The following agreements were entered into
or remained in force during the year ended December 31, 2015:
Consulting Agreement with Fountainhead
Effective as of January 2, 2014, the Company
and Fountainhead amended their Consulting Agreement to extend the term of the Consulting Agreement to January 2, 2015, such Agreement
being automatically extended on the same terms unless terminated by either party. During fiscal year 2015, a monthly fee was payable
to Fountainhead in the amount of $10,000 per month, payable $5,000 in cash and the remainder payable in Company Common Stock deliverable
at the end of each fiscal quarter. Effective September 2015, Fountainhead agreed to receive all of the fees in Common Stock.
Investor Relations Agreements
In January 2015, as amended in May 2015, the
Company entered into a twelve month agreement, subject to early termination, to provide financial advisory, strategic business
planning and professional relations services, with Acorn Management Partners (“Acorn”). Under the terms of the Agreement,
as amended in May and July 2015, Acorn received a total of $53,000 in cash and $50,000 in shares of Restricted Common Stock during
the period. The Acorn Agreement was terminated in October 2015.
In August 2015, the Company entered into a
three month agreement to provide investor relations advisory and consulting services, with Liolios Group, Inc. (“Liolios”).
Under the terms of the Liolios Agreement, Liolios received $15,000 in cash and $10,000 in Restricted Common Stock. The Liolios
agreement was terminated at the end of the three month period.
14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Peter Zachariou, director and David Cantor,
director are investment managers of Fountainhead Capital Management which is a related party due to the size of its shareholding.
Adrian Liddell, Chairman is a consultant for Fountainhead Capital Management.
During 2015, in accordance with the terms the
Consulting Agreement, the Company issued 49,819 shares of Common Stock (valued at $90,000) to Fountainhead.
During 2015 Preferred D Stock, convertible
into shares of Common Stock, was issued in respect of Preferred Dividends as follows: 11,691 shares of Preferred D Stock (valued
at $116,915), convertible into 54,377 shares of Common Stock to Fountainhead; and 4,313 shares of Preferred D Stock (valued at
$43,130), convertible into 20,060 shares of Common Stock to Peter Zachariou.
There were no other related party transactions
during the year ended December 31, 2015.
15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
There are no material subsequent events.
VYCOR MEDICAL, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
87,709
|
|
|
$
|
347,477
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,711 and $2,711
|
|
|
222,636
|
|
|
|
106,340
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
239,696
|
|
|
|
292,538
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
88,748
|
|
|
|
112,338
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
638,789
|
|
|
|
858,693
|
|
Fixed assets, net
|
|
|
457,693
|
|
|
|
521,105
|
|
Intangible and Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
251,157
|
|
|
|
251,157
|
|
Patents, net of accumulated amortization
|
|
|
274,506
|
|
|
|
323,138
|
|
Website, net of accumulated amortization
|
|
|
17,253
|
|
|
|
19,548
|
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
42,841
|
|
|
|
49,090
|
|
Total Intangible and Other assets
|
|
|
585,757
|
|
|
|
642,933
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
1,682,239
|
|
|
$
|
2,022,731
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
155,181
|
|
|
$
|
250,367
|
|
Accrued interest: Other
|
|
|
113,814
|
|
|
|
88,634
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
258,264
|
|
|
|
222,258
|
|
Notes payable: Related Party
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Notes payable: Other
|
|
|
312,153
|
|
|
|
315,750
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
1,024,412
|
|
|
|
877,009
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 261,168 and 252,336 issued and outstanding as at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 respectively
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, 11,158,069 and 11,032,560 shares issued and 11,054,735 and 10,929,226 outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 respectively
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
|
24,782,310
|
|
|
|
24,346,057
|
|
Treasury Stock (103,334 shares of Common Stock as at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 respectively, at cost)
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
|
|
(1,033
|
)
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
|
|
(24,253,779
|
)
|
|
|
(23,332,538
|
)
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
129,187
|
|
|
|
132,108
|
|
Total Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
657,827
|
|
|
|
1,145,722
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
$
|
1,682,239
|
|
|
$
|
2,022,731
|
|
See accompanying notes
to financial statements
VYCOR MEDICAL, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(unaudited)
|
|
For the three months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
379,406
|
|
|
$
|
286,018
|
|
|
$
|
779,492
|
|
|
$
|
614,570
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
|
|
48,086
|
|
|
|
33,981
|
|
|
|
115,325
|
|
|
|
85,674
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
331,320
|
|
|
|
252,037
|
|
|
|
664,167
|
|
|
|
528,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,672
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
38,898
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
66,310
|
|
|
|
86,708
|
|
|
|
129,595
|
|
|
|
169,357
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
556,512
|
|
|
|
607,750
|
|
|
|
1,340,846
|
|
|
|
1,387,052
|
|
Total Operating expenses
|
|
|
622,822
|
|
|
|
710,130
|
|
|
|
1,470,441
|
|
|
|
1,595,307
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(291,502
|
)
|
|
|
(458,093
|
)
|
|
|
(806,274
|
)
|
|
|
(1,066,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: Other
|
|
|
(12,206
|
)
|
|
|
(11,842
|
)
|
|
|
(24,188
|
)
|
|
|
(23,682
|
)
|
Interest expense: Related Party
|
|
|
(1,247
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,247
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gain (loss) on foreign currency exchange
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
17,723
|
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
|
|
(74,147
|
)
|
Change in fair value derivative liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
31,945
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19,792
|
|
Total Other Income (expense)
|
|
|
(13,861
|
)
|
|
|
37,826
|
|
|
|
(26,649
|
)
|
|
|
(78,037
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Before Credit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
(305,363
|
)
|
|
|
(420,267
|
)
|
|
|
(832,923
|
)
|
|
|
(1,144,448
|
)
|
Credit for income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
(305,363
|
)
|
|
|
(420,267
|
)
|
|
|
(832,923
|
)
|
|
|
(1,144,448
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(88,318
|
)
|
|
|
(82,446
|
)
|
Net Loss available to common shareholders
|
|
|
(305,363
|
)
|
|
|
(420,267
|
)
|
|
|
(921,241
|
)
|
|
|
(1,226,894
|
)
|
Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
(305,363
|
)
|
|
|
(420,267
|
)
|
|
|
(832,923
|
)
|
|
|
(1,144,448
|
)
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
|
19,076
|
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
|
(80,577
|
)
|
Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
(302,442
|
)
|
|
|
(401,191
|
)
|
|
|
(830,002
|
)
|
|
|
(1,225,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss Per Share Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding – Basic and Diluted
|
|
|
11,007,522
|
|
|
|
10,819,691
|
|
|
|
10,971,203
|
|
|
|
10,806,338
|
|
See accompanying notes
to financial statements
VYCOR MEDICAL, INC.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(832,923
|
)
|
|
|
(1,144,448
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
50,927
|
|
|
|
41,700
|
|
Depreciation of fixed assets
|
|
|
83,395
|
|
|
|
132,418
|
|
Inventory provision
|
|
|
2,544
|
|
|
|
15,162
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
347,950
|
|
|
|
138,460
|
|
(Gain) loss on foreign exchange
|
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
|
74,147
|
|
Unrealized gain on change in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(19,792
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(116,299
|
)
|
|
|
10,342
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
50,299
|
|
|
|
35,570
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
59,468
|
|
|
|
65,259
|
|
Accrued interest related party
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accrued interest other
|
|
|
23,934
|
|
|
|
23,803
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(95,186
|
)
|
|
|
(97,137
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
34,298
|
|
|
|
(33,638
|
)
|
Security Deposit
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
Cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(382,882
|
)
|
|
|
(751,904
|
)
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of fixed assets
|
|
|
(20,231
|
)
|
|
|
(26,486
|
)
|
Purchase of website
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,250
|
)
|
Acquisition of patents
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(66,276
|
)
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(20,231
|
)
|
|
|
(96,012
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of Notes Payable - Related Party
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Repayment of Notes Payable - Other
|
|
|
(39,475
|
)
|
|
|
(40,280
|
)
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
145,525
|
|
|
|
(40,280
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(2,180
|
)
|
|
|
7,256
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(259,768
|
)
|
|
|
(880,940
|
)
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
|
347,477
|
|
|
|
1,891,658
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
|
87,709
|
|
|
|
1,010,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends satisfied in new preferred stock
|
|
$
|
88,318
|
|
|
$
|
82,446
|
|
See Accompanying Notes
to Financial Statements
VYCOR MEDICAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2016
(unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements of the
Company present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of Vycor Medical, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”)
for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange
Commission. In accordance with those rules and regulations certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in comprehensive
financial statements have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2015 derives from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all the information and footnotes required
by GAAP. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
The consolidated financial statements for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results
to be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform
to the current presentation.
2. GOING CONCERN
The Company’s financial statements have
been presented on a basis that contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course
of business and assumes the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred losses since its inception, including
a net loss of $832,923 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, and the Company expects to continue to incur additional losses in
the future, including additional development costs, costs related to marketing and manufacturing expenses. The Company has incurred
negative cash flows from operations since inception. As of June 30, 2016 the Company had a stockholders’ equity of $657,827
and cash and cash equivalents of $87,709. The Company believes it would not have enough cash to meet its various cash needs unless
the Company is able to obtain additional cash from the issuance of debt or equity securities. There is no assurance that additional
funds from the issuance of equity will be available for the Company to finance its operations on acceptable terms or at all. If
adequate funds are not available, the Company may have to delay development or commercialization of products or technologies that
the Company would otherwise seek to commercialize, or cease some or all of its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt
about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect
the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities
that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of Vycor Medical, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, NovaVision, Inc. (a Delaware corporation), NovaVision GmbH
(a German corporation) and Sight Science Limited (a UK corporation), both wholly owned subsidiaries of NovaVision, Inc. The Company
is headquartered in Boca Raton, FL. All material inter-company accounts, transactions, and profits have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain reclassifications and format changes have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time new accounting pronouncements
are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other standard setting bodies that may have an impact on the Company’s
accounting and reporting. The Company believes that such recently issued accounting pronouncements and other authoritative guidance
for which the effective date is in the future will not have an impact on its accounting or reporting or that such impact will not
be material to its financial position, results of operations and cash flows when implemented.
Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing
net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed
giving effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares
consist of incremental shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants and conversion of preferred stock and convertible
debt. Such potentially dilutive shares are excluded when the effect would be to reduce a net loss per share. No dilution adjustment
has been made to the weighted average outstanding common shares in the periods presented because the assumed exercise of outstanding
options and warrants and the conversion of preferred stock and debt would be anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the potential
shares of common stock that are not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share:
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Stock options outstanding
|
|
|
705,557
|
|
|
|
25,557
|
|
Warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
6,007,048
|
|
|
|
6,007,048
|
|
Debentures convertible into common stock
|
|
|
229,204
|
|
|
|
215,908
|
|
Preferred shares convertible into common stock
|
|
|
2,444,275
|
|
|
|
1,188,471
|
|
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
|
59,083
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,445,167
|
|
|
|
7,436,984
|
|
4. NOTES PAYABLE
Related Party Notes Payable
As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 Related Party Notes Payable
consists of:
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
In the period the Company issued promissory notes to Fountainhead Capital Management Limited and Peter Zachariou for $185,000. The notes bear interest at 10% per annum and are payable on the earlier of one year or five days following the delivery of written demand for payment by the Payee.
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Related Party Notes Payable
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other Notes Payable
As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, Other Notes Payable consists
of:
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
On March 25, 2011 the Company issued a term note for $300,000 to EuroAmerican Investment Corp. (“EuroAmerican”). The term note bears interest at 16% per annum and was due June 25, 2011. In connection with the loan the Company also issued EuroAmerican warrants to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share for a period of three (3) years. On June 25, 2011 the due date for this note was extended to September 25, 2011 and the Holder was granted the right to convert all or any amount of the principal face amount of the debenture then outstanding and accrued interest into shares of common stock of the Company an adjusted conversion price of $1.80 per share, subject to adjustment and does not require bifurcation. The due date for this note has been extended to December 31, 2017.
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance policy finance agreements. During the period ended June 30, 2016 the Company made payments of $41,066. The notes are due over the next twelve months.
|
|
|
12,153
|
|
|
|
15,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Notes Payable:
|
|
|
312,153
|
|
|
|
315,750
|
|
The company assesses the value of the beneficial
conversion feature of its convertible debt by determining the intrinsic value of such conversion, under ASC 470, at the time of
issuance. At the time of issuance of the convertible debt instruments set out above, the fair value of the stock was either the
same or less than the conversion price, and so there was no value attributable to any beneficial conversion feature.
5. SEGMENT REPORTING, GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
(a) Business segments
The Company operates in two business segments:
Vycor Medical, which focuses on devices for neurosurgery; and NovaVision, which focuses on neuro stimulation therapies and diagnostic
devices for the treatment and screening of vision field loss and which includes Sight Science. Set out below are the revenues,
gross profits and total assets for each segment.
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
333,085
|
|
|
$
|
221,258
|
|
|
$
|
682,006
|
|
|
$
|
480,107
|
|
NovaVision
|
|
$
|
46,321
|
|
|
$
|
64,760
|
|
|
$
|
97,486
|
|
|
$
|
134,463
|
|
|
|
$
|
379,406
|
|
|
$
|
286,018
|
|
|
$
|
779,492
|
|
|
$
|
614,570
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
288,812
|
|
|
$
|
193,743
|
|
|
$
|
575,420
|
|
|
$
|
412,794
|
|
NovaVision
|
|
$
|
42,508
|
|
|
$
|
58,294
|
|
|
$
|
88,747
|
|
|
$
|
116,102
|
|
|
|
$
|
331,320
|
|
|
$
|
252,037
|
|
|
$
|
664,167
|
|
|
$
|
528,896
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Total Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vycor Medical
|
|
$
|
911,025
|
|
|
$
|
1,150,291
|
|
NovaVision
|
|
|
771,214
|
|
|
|
872,440
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,682,239
|
|
|
$
|
2,022,731
|
|
(b) Geographic information
The Company operates in two geographic segments,
the United States and Europe. Set out below are the revenues, gross profits and total assets for each segment.
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
356,170
|
|
|
$
|
248,059
|
|
|
$
|
728,476
|
|
|
$
|
531,998
|
|
Europe
|
|
$
|
23,236
|
|
|
$
|
37,959
|
|
|
$
|
51,016
|
|
|
$
|
82,572
|
|
|
|
$
|
379,406
|
|
|
$
|
286,018
|
|
|
$
|
779,492
|
|
|
$
|
614,570
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
309,318
|
|
|
$
|
217,977
|
|
|
$
|
616,556
|
|
|
$
|
456,328
|
|
Europe
|
|
$
|
22,002
|
|
|
$
|
34,060
|
|
|
$
|
47,611
|
|
|
$
|
72,568
|
|
|
|
$
|
331,320
|
|
|
$
|
252,037
|
|
|
$
|
664,167
|
|
|
$
|
528,896
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Total Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,399,124
|
|
|
$
|
1,699,589
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
283,115
|
|
|
|
323,142
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,682,239
|
|
|
$
|
2,022,731
|
|
6. EQUITY
Preferred Stock
During the six months ended June 30, 2016,
the Company paid an aggregate of 8,831 shares of Preferred D Stock, valued at $88,318, representing preferred stock dividends.
The Preferred D shares are convertible on their terms at $2.15 per share of Common Stock into 41,074 shares. An aggregate of 8,424
shares of Preferred D Stock dividends were in respect of related parties (See Note 11).
Common Stock and Stock Grants
During January to June 2016, the Company granted
59,083 shares of Common Stock (valued at $36,000) to non-employee Directors. Under the terms of the Directors Deferred Compensation
Plan, the receipt of these shares is deferred until the January 15
th
following the termination of their services as
a director.
During January to June 2016, the Company issued
32,254 shares of Common Stock (valued at $20,000) to members of the NovaVision, Inc. Scientific Advisory Board in respect of their
services.
During January to June 2016, in accordance
with the terms the Consulting Agreement, the Company issued 33,333 shares of Common Stock (valued at $60,000) to Fountainhead.
In April 2016, the Company entered into a Consulting
Agreement with Techmed Inc. and issued 9,921 share of Common Stock (valued at $6,250) under the agreement.
In May 2016, the Company entered into a Consulting
Agreement with Valeo Consulting and issued 50,000 share of Common Stock (valued at $27,500) under the agreement.
Warrants and Options
The details of the outstanding warrants and
options are as follows:
STOCK WARRANTS:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
exercise price per share
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
|
|
|
5,911,715
|
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.56
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled or expired
|
|
|
(4,667
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
6,007,048
|
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled or expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2016
|
|
|
6,007,048
|
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
STOCK OPTIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
exercise price per share
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2014
|
|
|
5,557
|
|
|
$
|
20.25
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled or expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
25,557
|
|
|
$
|
20.25
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
680,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled or expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2016
|
|
|
705,557
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
As of June 30, 2016, the weighted-average remaining
contractual life of outstanding warrants and options is 0.76 and 3.89 years, respectively.
7. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock Option Plan
Under ASC Topic 718, the Company estimates
the fair value of option awards on the date of grant using an option pricing model. The grant date fair value is recognized over
the option vesting period, the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. No compensation
cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. Under these standards, compensation
cost for employee cost for employee stock-based awards is based on the estimated grant-date fair value and recognized over the
vesting period of the applicable award on a straight-line basis.
For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and
2015, the Company recognized share-based compensation of $198,200 and $25,011, respectively, for employee stock options.
Stock appreciation rights may be granted either
on a stand alone basis or in conjunction with all or part of any other stock options granted under the plan. As of June 30, 2016
there were no awards of any stock appreciation rights.
Non-Employee Stock Compensation
The Company from time to time issues common
stock, stock options or common stock warrants to acquire services or goods from non-employees. Common stock, stock options and
common stock warrants issued to other than employees or directors are recorded on the basis of their fair value, which is measured
as of the “measurement date” using an option pricing model. The “measurement date” for options and warrants
related to contracts that have substantial disincentives to non-performance is the date of the contract, and for all other contracts
is the vesting date. Expense related to the options and warrants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the
period over which services are to be received or the life of the option or warrant.
Aggregate stock-based compensation expense
charged to operations for stock and warrants granted to non-employees for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $149,750.
Stock-based Compensation Valuation Methodology
Stock-based compensation resulting from the
issuance of Common Stock is calculated by reference to the valuation of the Stock on the date of issuance, the expense being recognized
as the compensation is earned. Stock-based compensation expenses related to employee options and warrants granted to non-employees
are recognized as the stock options and warrants are earned. The fair value of the stock options or warrants granted is estimated
at the grant date, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and the expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
shorter of the period over which services are to be received or the life of the option or warrant. The grant date fair value of
employee share options and similar instruments is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the basis of the fair
value of the underlying common stock on the measurement date, adjusted for the unique characteristics of those equity instruments,
using the assumptions noted in the table below. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of a peer group of publicly
traded companies. The expected term of options and warrants was based upon the expected life of the option or warrant, and the
risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity rate.
The following assumptions were used in calculations
of the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
1.07
|
%
|
Expected life
|
|
|
1.5 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
95
|
%
|
|
|
101
|
%
|
Vycor Common Stock fair value
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company has adopted ASC 820 for its financial
assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period. The adoption of ASC 820 did not
have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Under the terms of the Offering during the
period January 2 to April 25, 2014, in five separate closings, a total of 2,397,631 Series A Warrants and Placement Agent Warrants
were issued, which carried anti-dilution rights. Effective May 15, 2014 these anti-dilution rights were waived for all but 34,723
of the Series A Warrants and for all of the Placement Agent Warrants. The Company accounted for the Series A Warrants in accordance
with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40-15-7D, whereby under that provision, because they had anti-dilution rights, they did
not meet the criteria for equity treatment and needed to be recorded as a liability. Accordingly, the Company classified the warrant
instrument as a liability at its fair value and adjusted the instrument to fair value at each reporting period. The anti-dilution
provisions expired on June 11, 2015 and accordingly the liability was extinguished at that date.
The following table presents information about
the Company’s liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (the 34,723 Series A Warrants above) as of
June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs the Company utilized to determine
such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable such as quoted prices,
interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the liability, and includes
situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the liability:
Description
|
|
June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Warrant Liability
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
The table below provides a reconciliation of
the beginning and ending balances for the liabilities measured using fair significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Balance at start of period
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
19,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value to June 11, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
Extinguishment of liability June 11, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,277
|
)
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The fair value of the Series A Warrants Warrants
was determined using a Monte Carlo Simulation. This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected
price volatility, which is based on the historical volatility of a peer group of publicly traded companies. Changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value of the warrants and the Company’s results of operations
could be impacted.
The following assumptions were used in calculations
of the Monte Carlo Simulation model for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.56-.73%
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1.65 years
|
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
90-93%
|
|
Vycor Common Stock fair value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1.59-1.84
|
|
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease
The Company leases approximately 10,000 sq.
ft located at 6401 Congress Ave., Suite 140, Boca Raton, FL 33487 from Catexor Limited Partnership for a gross rent of $15,439
plus sales tax per month. The term of the lease is 5 years and 6 months terminating July, 2017. The Company’s subsidiaries
in Germany and the UK occupy properties on short term lease agreements. Rent expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and
2015 was $53,654 and $47,211 respectively.
Potential German tax liability
In June 2012 the Company’s German subsidiary
received a preliminary assessment for Magdeburg City trade tax of approximately €75,000 (approximately $85,000). This assessment
is for the 2010 fiscal year and relates to the Company’s acquisition of the assets of the former NovaVision, Inc. An initial
assessment for corporate tax for the same period has been preliminarily reduced to zero. The Company has not accepted this trade
tax assessment and is in discussion with the relevant tax authorities with a view to its reduction. The tax authorities have agreed
to suspend the assessment pending the outcome of certain court hearings, and the Company has agreed to make limited monthly payments
on account. To the extent that this assessment (either a higher or a reduced amount) is ultimately confirmed by the tax authorities,
the Company believes it has a very strong claim against certain professional advisors which would offset the liability in full.
Accordingly, the Company has made no provision for this liability in the six months ended June 30, 2016 and the year ended December
31, 2015 respectively, other than recording the monthly payments as an expense.
Potential Patent Infringement
The Company was made aware in 2012 that a competitor
had been granted a patent for related technology, and appeared to be entering the market with products that infringe the Company’s
own issued patent. Following investigation, the Company initiated an invalidation of the competitor’s patent; in March 2014
the Patent Re-examination Board issued an Examination Decision invalidating all the claims of the competitor’s patent. The
competitor appealed the decision, but the Company has contested the appeal. A final decision on the appeal is pending. The Company
has, in the interim, also prepared to enforce its own patent against this competitor, however this competitor appears to have abandoned
its product offering, making an enforcement action moot for the time being. The Company has also been made aware that a second
competitor has filed a patent application for related technology and also may be producing a product that potentially infringes
the Company’s patent, and has filed documents with the State Intellectual Property Office opposing grant of the patent application.
As a general rule the Company intends to take all necessary action to protect its patent portfolio. As with all patent infringement
actions, there is some risk that the accused infringer will not be found to infringe the claims, and an additional risk that the
accused infringer will successfully challenge the validity of the asserted claims.
10. CONSULTING AND OTHER AGREEMENTS
The following agreements were entered into
or remained in force during the six months ended June 30, 2016:
Under the terms of an amended Consulting Agreement
between the Company and Fountainhead, Fountainhead is paid a monthly retainer of $10,000 per month, payable $5,000 in cash and
$5,000 payable in Company Common Stock at the end of each quarter. Effective September 2015, Fountainhead agreed to receive all
of the fees in Common Stock.
In
January 2015, as amended in May 2015, the Company entered into a twelve month agreement, subject to early termination, to provide
financial advisory, strategic business planning and professional relations services, with Acorn Management Partners (“Acorn”).
Under the terms of the Agreement, as amended in May and July 2015, Acorn received a total of $53,000 in cash and $50,000 in shares
of Restricted Common Stock during the period. The Acorn Agreement was terminated in October 2015.
In
May 2016 the Company entered into a Consultancy agreement with Valeo Consulting LLC to assist in the raising of capital and related
financial matters by dealing with potential investors, banks and brokers on behalf of the Company. Under the agreement the Company
issued 50,000 shares of Vycor Common Stock on execution and 50,000 on August 1, 2016.
11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Peter
Zachariou, director and David Cantor, director are investment managers of Fountainhead Capital Management which is a related party
due to the size of its shareholding. Adrian Liddell, Chairman is a consultant for Fountainhead Capital Management.
During the period ended June 30, 2016, in accordance
with the terms of the Consulting Agreement, the Company issued 33,333 shares of Common Stock (valued at $60,000) to Fountainhead.
During the six months ended June 30, 2016,
the Company paid an aggregate of 8,424 shares of Preferred D Stock, valued at $84,248 representing preferred stock dividends to
related parties. The Preferred D shares are convertible on their terms at $2.15 per share of Common Stock into 39,181 shares.
During the period ended June 30, 2016, the
Company issued unsecured loan notes to Fountainhead for a total of $140,000. The loan notes bear interest at a rate of 10% and
are due on demand or by their one-year anniversary.
During the period ended June 30, 2016, the
Company issued unsecured loan notes to Peter Zachariou for a total of $45,000. The loan notes bear interest at a rate of 10% and
are due on demand or by their one-year anniversary
12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company evaluated subsequent events through
the date the financial statements were issued and filed with this Form 10Q:
In August 2016 the Company issued 50,000 shares
of Vycor Common Stock (valued at $13,200) to Valeo Consulting LLC under the terms of the Consultancy Agreement.
In August 2016 the Company paid an aggregate
of 9,140 shares of Preferred D Stock, valued at $91,409, representing preferred stock dividends. The Preferred D shares are convertible
on their terms at $2.15 per share of Common Stock into 42,512 shares. An aggregate of 8,718 shares of Preferred D Stock dividends
were in respect of related parties.
This prospectus is part of a registration statement
we filed with the SEC. You should rely only on the information or representations provided in or incorporated by reference into
this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone else to provide you with different information. You should not assume that the information
in this prospectus or any supplement is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of those documents.
No dealer, salesperson or any other person
has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations other than those contained in or incorporated by reference
in this prospectus in connection with the offer made by this prospectus, and, if given or made, such information or representations
must not be relied upon as having been authorized by us. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any security other than the securities offered hereby, nor does it constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation
of any offer to buy any of the shares offered by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorized,
or in which the person making such offer or solicitation is not qualified to do so, or to any person to whom it is unlawful to
make such offer or solicitation.
Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor
any sale made hereunder shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that the information contained herein is correct
as of any time subsequent to the date hereof.
The date of this prospectus is October 14,
2016.
Vycor Medical (QB) (USOTC:VYCO)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Dez 2024 até Jan 2025
Vycor Medical (QB) (USOTC:VYCO)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jan 2024 até Jan 2025