UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
ý
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2012
or
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from __________________
to _________________
Commission File Number
0-51589
NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES, INC.
|
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
04-3693643
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
855 Enfield Street, Enfield, Connecticut
|
06082
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
(860) 253-5200
|
(Issuer’s telephone number)
|
Not Applicable
|
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. (See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large
accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated
filer
o
Smaller Reporting Company
ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
ý
The Issuer had 5,807,684 shares of common stock,
par value $0.01 per share, outstanding as of August 10, 2012.
NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES,
INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Part I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements.
NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
June 30,
2012
|
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
8,492
|
|
|
$
|
9,666
|
|
Interest-bearing demand deposits with other banks
|
|
|
58,195
|
|
|
|
52,398
|
|
Money market mutual funds
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
66,938
|
|
|
|
62,064
|
|
Investments in available-for-sale securities, at fair value
|
|
|
57,822
|
|
|
|
61,587
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $5,815 as of June 30, 2012
and $5,697 as of March 31, 2012
|
|
|
559,562
|
|
|
|
552,246
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
6,026
|
|
|
|
6,161
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
4,744
|
|
|
|
4,741
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
10,456
|
|
|
|
10,371
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
16,783
|
|
|
|
16,783
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
|
3,651
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
733,022
|
|
|
$
|
726,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
73,887
|
|
|
$
|
69,412
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
513,601
|
|
|
|
511,856
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
587,488
|
|
|
|
581,268
|
|
Advanced payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
|
32,508
|
|
|
|
33,044
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
3,929
|
|
|
|
3,927
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
28,477
|
|
|
|
27,752
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
5,106
|
|
|
|
5,637
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
660,338
|
|
|
|
653,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share: 1,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common stock, par value $.01 per share: 19,000,000 shares authorized;
6,947,012 shares issued at June 30, 2012 and 6,945,591 shares
issued at March 31, 2012
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
60,020
|
|
|
|
60,001
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
24,573
|
|
|
|
23,942
|
|
Unearned ESOP shares, 147,641 shares at June 30, 2012 and
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
(1,476
|
)
|
|
|
(1,476
|
)
|
Treasury stock, 1,139,328 shares at June 30, 2012 and 998,967 shares at
March 31, 2012, at cost
|
|
|
(11,121
|
)
|
|
|
(9,625
|
)
|
Unearned shares, stock-based plans, no shares at June 30,
2012 and March 31, 2012
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
72,684
|
|
|
|
73,370
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
733,022
|
|
|
$
|
726,502
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per
share amounts)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Interest and dividend income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on loans
|
|
$
|
7,460
|
|
|
$
|
7,518
|
|
Interest and dividends on securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
Interest on federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits and
dividends on money market mutual funds
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Total interest and dividend income
|
|
|
7,905
|
|
|
|
8,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
Interest on advanced payments by borrowers for
taxes and insurance
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Interest on subordinated debentures
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Interest on securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
2,517
|
|
Net interest and dividend income
|
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
5,560
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Net interest and dividend income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
5,348
|
|
|
|
5,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Gain on securities, net
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies.
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
Noninterest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
2,114
|
|
|
|
2,268
|
|
Occupancy and equipment expense
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
Advertising and promotion
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Data processing expense
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
FDIC insurance assessment
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Stationery and supplies
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Write-down of other real estate owned
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Merger related expenses
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
4,721
|
|
|
|
4,591
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
|
$
|
779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
Dividends per share
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
|
$
|
779
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
961
|
|
|
$
|
1,185
|
|
The accompanying notes are
an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Condensed Consolidated
Statements Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
For the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2012 and 2011
(in thousands except for
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Based
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
ESOP
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2011
|
|
|
6,938,087
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
59,876
|
|
|
$
|
20,091
|
|
|
$
|
(1,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
(386
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,431
|
)
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
70,691
|
|
Compensation cost for stock-based incentive plans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Dividends paid ($0.03 per share)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
779
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2011
|
|
|
6,938,087
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
59,909
|
|
|
$
|
20,691
|
|
|
$
|
(1,714
|
)
|
|
$
|
(352
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,431
|
)
|
|
$
|
592
|
|
|
$
|
71,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2012
|
|
|
6,945,591
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
60,001
|
|
|
$
|
23,942
|
|
|
$
|
(1,476
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(9,625
|
)
|
|
$
|
459
|
|
|
$
|
73,370
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Compensation cost for stock-based incentive plans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Dividends paid ($0.03 per share)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
Treasury stock purchases (140,361 shares)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2012
|
|
|
6,947,012
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
60,020
|
|
|
$
|
24,573
|
|
|
$
|
(1,476
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(11,121
|
)
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
|
$
|
72,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are
an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
|
$
|
779
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of fair value adjustments
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Accretion of securities, net
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Gain on sales and calls of investments, net
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Writedown of other real estate owned
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Gain on sale of loans, net
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Loans originated for sale
|
|
|
(4,222
|
)
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of loans for sale
|
|
|
4,202
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of other real estate owned
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Change in deferred loan origination costs, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
Decrease in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
1,716
|
|
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
Compensation cost for stock option plan
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Compensation cost for stock-based incentive plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
3,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(10,373
|
)
|
|
|
(7,493
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
6,134
|
|
|
|
6,179
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
8,452
|
|
|
|
4,296
|
|
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Loan originations and principal collections, net
|
|
|
(7,707
|
)
|
|
|
(3,510
|
)
|
Purchases of loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Proceeds from sale of loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
Capital expenditures - premises and equipment
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(3,056
|
)
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
The accompanying notes
are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
(continued)
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in demand, NOW, MMDA and savings accounts
|
|
|
8,427
|
|
|
|
14,964
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in time deposits
|
|
|
(2,207
|
)
|
|
|
6,420
|
|
Net increase in advanced payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
Principal payments on Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
|
(536
|
)
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
Net increase in securities sold under agreement to repurchase
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
3,870
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(1,496
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Payments of cash dividends on common stock
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
6,082
|
|
|
|
25,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,874
|
|
|
|
30,115
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
62,064
|
|
|
|
43,612
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
66,938
|
|
|
$
|
73,727
|
|
Supplemental disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
2,185
|
|
|
$
|
2,534
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Loans transferred to other real estate owned
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes
are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES,
INC.
Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 – Nature of Operations
New England Bancshares,
Inc. (“New England Bancshares,” or the “Company”) is a Maryland corporation and the bank holding company
for New England Bank (the “Bank”). The principal asset of the Company is its investment in the Bank. The Company was
organized in 2005 in connection with the “second-step” mutual-to-stock conversion of Enfield Mutual Holding Company.
The Bank, incorporated
in 1999, is a Connecticut chartered commercial bank headquartered in Enfield, Connecticut. The Bank’s deposits are insured
by the FDIC. The Bank is engaged principally in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and investing those
deposits primarily in residential real estate loans, commercial real estate loans, and commercial loans, and to a lesser extent,
construction and consumer loans.
On May 31, 2012, the Company executed a
definitive merger agreement with United Financial Bancorp, Inc. (“United Financial”) under which United Financial will
acquire the Company in a transaction valued then at $91 million based on United Financial’s 20 day volume weighted average
stock price of $15.89 as of May 30, 2012.
Under the terms of the definitive merger
agreement, at the effective time of the merger, each share of the Company’s common stock will be converted to 0.9575 of a
share of United Financial common stock. The consideration received by the Company’s stockholders is intended to qualify as
a tax-free transaction. The transaction has been approved by the boards of directors of both the Company and United Financial.
NOTE 2 – Basis of
Presentation
The accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America for interim financial statements and the instructions to Form 10-Q, and accordingly do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments
necessary, consisting of only normal recurring accruals, to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company for the periods presented. In preparing the interim financial statements, management is required to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and
expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. The interim results of operations presented
are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the year ending March 31, 2013 or any interim period.
While management believes
that the disclosures presented are adequate so as not to make the information misleading, it is suggested that these condensed
consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s
Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012.
The condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of March 31, 2012 was derived from the Company’s audited financial statements, but does not include all
the disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
NOTE 3 – Earnings
per Share (EPS)
Basic EPS is computed by
dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted
into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. As of June 30, 2012,
110,563 shares were anti-dilutive for the three month period, compared to 148,563 anti-dilutive shares for the three month period
ended June 30, 2011. Anti-dilutive shares are stock options with exercise prices in excess of the weighted-average market value
for the same period and are not included in the determination of diluted earnings per share. Unallocated common shares held by
the Bank’s employee stock ownership plan are not included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for
purposes of calculating both basic and diluted EPS.
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per-Share
|
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to unvested shares
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income and income available to common stockholders
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
5,687,051
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
90,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common stockholders and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assumed conversions
|
|
$
|
801
|
|
|
|
5,777,546
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
779
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to unvested shares
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income and income available to common stockholders
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
|
5,939,177
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
66,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common stockholders and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assumed conversions
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
|
|
6,005,447
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
NOTE 4 – Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued
ASU 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International
Financial Reporting Standards.” The amendments in this ASU explain how to measure fair value. They do not require additional
fair value measurements and are not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial
reporting. The amendments in this ASU are to be applied prospectively. The amendments are effective during interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact
on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB
issued ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” The objective of this ASU is to improve the comparability,
consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income.
Under this ASU, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components
of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive
statements. An entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other
comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. An entity
is required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from
other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive
income are presented. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively. The amendments are effective for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of
this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, the
FASB issued ASU 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other”, an update to ASC 350, “Intangibles –
Goodwill and Other.” ASU 2011-08 simplifies how entities, both public and nonpublic, test goodwill for impairment. The amendments
in this update permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not the fair value
of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step
goodwill impairment test described in ASC 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than
50 percent. For public and nonpublic entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment
tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance
is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
In September 2011, the
FASB issued ASU 2011-09, “Disclosures About an Employer’s Participation in a Multiemployer Plan,” which amends
ASC 715-80, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits - Multiemployer Plans,” and requires additional separate disclosures
for multiemployer pension plans and multiemployer other postretirement benefit plans. This objective of this ASU is to help users
of financial statements assess the potential future cash flow implications relating to an employer’s participation in multiemployer
pension plans. The disclosures also will indicate the financial health of all of the significant plans in which the employer participates
and assist a financial statement user to access additional information that is available outside the financial statements. The
amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The amendments
should be applied retrospectively for all prior periods presented. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance
will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2011, the FASB
issued ASU 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” This ASU is to enhance current disclosures.
Entities are required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for
offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting
arrangement. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods
within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative
periods presented. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
In December 2011, the FASB
issued ASU 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation
of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05.”
The amendments in this update defer those changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassifications out of accumulated
other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. All other
requirements in ASU 2011-05 are not affected by this update. The amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2011. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 5 – Stock-Based
Incentive Plan
At June 30, 2012, the Company
maintained a stock-based incentive plan and an equity incentive plan. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, compensation
cost for the Company’s stock plans was measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and was recognized over
the service period, which was the vesting period. The compensation cost that has been charged against income in the three months
ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 for the granting of stock options under the plans was $6,000 and $33,000, respectively. The Company
did not grant any options during the three months ended June 30, 2012. During the three months June 2011, the Company granted 20,000
stock options.
There was no compensation
cost charged against income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 for the granting of restricted stock. The compensation cost
that has been charged against income for the granting of restricted stock awards under the plan for the three months ended June
30, 2011 was $34,000.
NOTE 6 – Loans
A summary of the balances
of loans follows:
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family
|
|
$
|
121,216
|
|
|
$
|
125,636
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
36,078
|
|
|
|
37,724
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
299,366
|
|
|
|
289,057
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
9,639
|
|
|
|
9,772
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
97,995
|
|
|
|
94,668
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
564,294
|
|
|
|
556,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(5,815
|
)
|
|
|
(5,697
|
)
|
Net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
559,562
|
|
|
$
|
552,246
|
|
The Company has transferred
a portion of its originated commercial real estate loans and commercial loans to participating lenders. The amounts transferred
have been accounted for as sales and therefore not included in the Company’s accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The
Company and participating lenders share ratably in any gains and losses that may result from a borrower’s lack of compliance
with contractual terms of the loan. The Company continues to service the loans on behalf of the participating lenders and, as such,
collects cash payments from the borrowers, remits payments (net of servicing fees) to participating lenders and disburses required
escrow funds to relevant parties. At June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, the Company was servicing loans for participants aggregating
$13.5 million and $13.3 million, respectively.
NOTE 7 – Allowance
for Loan Losses and Impaired Assets
Analysis and Determination
of the Allowance for Loan Losses
.
We maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb probable losses inherent in the existing
portfolio. When a loan, or portion thereof, is considered uncollectible and reasonably estimable, it is charged against the allowance.
Recoveries of amounts previously charged-off are added to the allowance when collected. The adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management. Based on management’s judgment, the allowance for loan losses covers
all known losses and inherent losses in the loan portfolio.
Our methodology for assessing
the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses consists of specific allowances for identified problem loans and a general
valuation allowance on the remainder of the loan portfolio. Although we determine the amount of each element of the allowance separately,
the entire allowance for loan losses is available for the entire portfolio.
Specific Allowances
for Identified Problem Loans.
We establish an allowance on identified problem loans based on factors including, but not limited
to: (1) the borrower’s ability to repay the loan; (2) the type and value of the collateral; (3) the strength of our collateral
position; and (4) the borrower’s repayment history.
General Valuation Allowance
on the Remainder of the Portfolio.
We also establish a general allowance by applying loss factors to the remainder of the loan
portfolio to capture the inherent losses associated with the lending activity. This general valuation allowance is determined by
segregating the loans by loan category and assigning loss factors to each category. The loss factors are determined based on our
historical loss experience, delinquency trends and management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio. Based
on management’s judgment, we may adjust the loss factors due to: (1) changes in lending policies and procedures; (2) changes
in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary market area; (3) credit quality trends; (4) collateral
value; (5) loan volumes and concentrations; (6) seasoning of the loan portfolio; (7) recent loss experience in particular segments
of the portfolio; (8) duration of the current business cycle; and (9) bank regulatory examination results. Loss factors are re-evaluated
quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current real estate environment.
Activity in the allowance
for loan losses is summarized below:
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Home
Equity
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Consumer
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial
Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance March 31, 2012
|
|
$
|
789
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
2,794
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
1,923
|
|
|
$
|
5,697
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
Charge Offs
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Balance June 30, 2012
|
|
$
|
817
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
2,232
|
|
|
$
|
5,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
738
|
|
|
$
|
154
|
|
|
$
|
1,981
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
|
$
|
5,686
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
Charge Offs
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Balance June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
1,969
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
2,802
|
|
|
$
|
5,597
|
|
The following table presents
the balance in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and based on impairment evaluation method as of June 30, 2012:
|
|
Individually
Evaluated for
Impairment
|
|
|
Collectively
Evaluated for
Impairment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 Family Residential
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
459
|
|
|
$
|
817
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
2,564
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
2,232
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
2,053
|
|
|
$
|
3,762
|
|
|
$
|
5,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 Family Residential
|
|
$
|
2,152
|
|
|
$
|
119,064
|
|
|
$
|
121,216
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
36,078
|
|
|
|
36,078
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
3,665
|
|
|
|
295,701
|
|
|
|
299,366
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,639
|
|
|
|
9,639
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
95,465
|
|
|
|
97,995
|
|
Total loan balances
|
|
$
|
8,347
|
|
|
$
|
555,947
|
|
|
$
|
564,294
|
|
The following table presents
the balance in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and based on impairment evaluation method as of March 31, 2012:
|
|
Individually
Evaluated for
Impairment
|
|
|
Collectively
Evaluated for
Impairment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 Family Residential
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
789
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
2,587
|
|
|
|
2,794
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
|
|
1,923
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
$
|
5,103
|
|
|
$
|
5,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 Family Residential
|
|
$
|
1,247
|
|
|
$
|
124,389
|
|
|
$
|
125,636
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
37,724
|
|
|
|
37,724
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
9,961
|
|
|
|
279,096
|
|
|
|
289,057
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,772
|
|
|
|
9,772
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
4,103
|
|
|
|
90,565
|
|
|
|
94,668
|
|
Total loan balances
|
|
$
|
15,311
|
|
|
$
|
541,546
|
|
|
$
|
556,857
|
|
There have been no significant
changes in the Company’s methodology for evaluating the allowance for loan losses.
Risk Characteristics
by Portfolio Segment.
Loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate have historically been the least risky
loan type. However they are affected by declines in the general residential housing market, unemployment and under-employment,
and the tightening of lending requirements and standards. Loans secured by commercial real estate, including multi-family loans,
generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Of primary
concern in commercial real estate lending is the borrower’s creditworthiness and the feasibility and cash flow potential
of the project. Payments on loans secured by income properties often depend on successful operation and management of the properties.
As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater extent than residential real estate loans to adverse conditions
in the real estate market or the economy. Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of
loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy
of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost (including interest)
of construction. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If the estimate of
construction costs proves to be inaccurate, we may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit
completion of the building. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, we may be confronted, at or before the maturity of
the loan, with a building having a value which is insufficient to assure full repayment. Commercial loans are of higher risk and
typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business.
As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial loans may depend substantially on the success of the business
itself. Further, any collateral securing such loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in
value. Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that
are unsecured or secured by assets that depreciate rapidly. In such cases, repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan
may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan and the remaining deficiency often does not warrant further
substantial collection efforts against the borrower. In addition, consumer loan collections depend on the borrower’s continuing
financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.
Credit Risk Management.
Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Our
strategy for credit risk management focuses on having well-defined credit policies and uniform underwriting criteria and providing
prompt attention to potential problem loans.
When a borrower fails
to make a required loan payment, we take a number of steps to have the borrower cure the delinquency and restore the loan to current
status. We make initial contact with the borrower when the loan becomes 15 days past due. If payment is not received by the 30
th
day of delinquency, additional letters and phone calls generally are made. Typically, when the loan becomes 60 days past due, we
send a letter notifying the borrower that we may commence legal proceedings if the loan is not paid in full within 30 days. Generally,
loan workout arrangements are made with the borrower at this time; however, if an arrangement cannot be structured before the loan
becomes 90 days past due, we will send a formal demand letter and, once the time period specified in that letter expires, commence
legal proceedings against any real property that secures the loan or attempt to repossess any business assets or personal property
that secures the loan. If a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not brought current, paid in full or refinanced before
the foreclosure sale, the real property securing the loan generally is sold at foreclosure.
We consider repossessed
assets and loans that are 90 days or more past due to be non-performing assets. Past due status is based on contractual terms of
the loan. When a loan becomes 90 days delinquent, the loan is placed on non-accrual status at which time the accrual of interest
ceases and an allowance for any uncollectible accrued interest is established and charged against operations. Typically, payments
received on a non-accrual loan are applied to the outstanding principal and interest as determined at the time of collection of
the loan. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current
and future payments are reasonably assured.
Management informs
the Boards of Directors monthly of the amount of loans delinquent more than 90 days, all loans in foreclosure and all foreclosed
and repossessed property that we own.
Banking regulations require
us to review and classify our assets on a regular basis. In addition, the Connecticut Department of Banking and FDIC have the authority
to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are three classifications for problem assets:
substandard, doubtful and loss. “Substandard assets” must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized
by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. “Doubtful assets”
have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation
in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable and there is a high possibility of loss. An
asset classified “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution
is not warranted. The regulations also provide for a “special mention” category, described as assets that do not currently
expose us to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving
our close attention. When we classify an asset as substandard or doubtful, we establish a specific allowance for loan losses. If
we classify an asset as loss, we charge off an amount equal to 100% of the portion of the asset classified as loss.
The following table shows
the risk rating grade of the loan portfolio broken-out by type as of June 30, 2012. There were no loans rated doubtful or loss
as of June 30, 2012.
|
|
Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Home Equity
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Grade:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
281,999
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
89,671
|
|
|
$
|
371,670
|
|
Special mention
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,681
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
8,162
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
10,686
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
6,843
|
|
|
|
22,496
|
|
Not formally rated
|
|
|
116,516
|
|
|
|
35,859
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,591
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
161,966
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
121,216
|
|
|
$
|
36,078
|
|
|
$
|
299,366
|
|
|
$
|
9,639
|
|
|
$
|
97,995
|
|
|
$
|
564,294
|
|
The following table shows
the risk rating grade of the loan portfolio broken-out by type as of March 31, 2012. There were no loans rated doubtful or loss
as of March 31, 2012.
|
|
Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Home Equity
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Grade:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
266,757
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
86,360
|
|
|
$
|
353,117
|
|
Special mention
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,896
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
9,252
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
14,404
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
6,952
|
|
|
|
25,983
|
|
Not formally rated
|
|
|
121,351
|
|
|
|
37,414
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,740
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
168,505
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
125,636
|
|
|
$
|
37,724
|
|
|
$
|
289,057
|
|
|
$
|
9,772
|
|
|
$
|
94,668
|
|
|
$
|
556,857
|
|
Impaired Loans.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to
collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors
considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting
scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally
are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case
basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay,
the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal
and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value
of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price,
or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
The following table shows
the Company’s impaired loans at June 30, 2012.
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
Related
Allowance
|
|
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
With no related allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family
|
|
$
|
2,654
|
|
|
$
|
3,206
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,795
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
6,240
|
|
|
|
7,418
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,375
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
3,431
|
|
|
|
4,344
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,323
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Total impaired with no related
allowance recorded
|
|
$
|
12,591
|
|
|
$
|
15,239
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
12,626
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family
|
|
$
|
2,152
|
|
|
$
|
2,215
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
1,232
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
3,665
|
|
|
|
3,665
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
1,709
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Total impaired with an
allowance recorded
|
|
$
|
8,347
|
|
|
$
|
8,410
|
|
|
$
|
2,053
|
|
|
$
|
5,499
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family
|
|
$
|
4,806
|
|
|
$
|
5,421
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
3,027
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
9,905
|
|
|
|
11,083
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
9,933
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
5,961
|
|
|
|
6,874
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
5,032
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
20,938
|
|
|
$
|
23,649
|
|
|
$
|
2,053
|
|
|
$
|
18,125
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
The following table shows
the Company’s impaired loans at March 31, 2012.
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
Related
Allowance
|
|
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family
|
|
$
|
936
|
|
|
$
|
973
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,843
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
8,510
|
|
|
|
8,590
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,458
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
3,214
|
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Total impaired with no related
allowance recorded
|
|
$
|
12,660
|
|
|
$
|
13,530
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10,011
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
3,792
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
2,156
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Total impaired with an
allowance recorded
|
|
$
|
2,651
|
|
|
$
|
2,784
|
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
$
|
7,468
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family
|
|
$
|
1,247
|
|
|
$
|
1,362
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
3,313
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
9,961
|
|
|
|
10,072
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
9,250
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
4,103
|
|
|
|
4,880
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
4,638
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
15,311
|
|
|
$
|
16,314
|
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
$
|
17,479
|
|
|
$
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquencies.
The following table
provides information about delinquencies in our loan portfolio as of June 30, 2012.
|
|
30-59
Days
|
|
|
Greater
Than 60-89
Days
|
|
|
Greater
Than
90 Days
|
|
|
Total
Past Due
|
|
|
90 Days
or More and
Accruing
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
loans
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-4 family
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
1,684
|
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,391
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
5,810
|
|
|
|
8,281
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,318
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
3,112
|
|
|
|
5,505
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,906
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,286
|
|
|
$
|
2,076
|
|
|
$
|
10,673
|
|
|
$
|
16,035
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
14,882
|
|
The following table provides information
about delinquencies in our loan portfolio as of March 31, 2012.
|
|
30-59
Days
|
|
|
Greater
Than
60-89 Days
|
|
|
Greater
Than
90 Days
|
|
|
Total
Past Due
|
|
|
90 Days
or More and
Accruing
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$
|
2,771
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,217
|
|
|
$
|
4,988
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,734
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,702
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
7,830
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,141
|
|
Home equity loans
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
3,545
|
|
|
|
5,340
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,072
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,326
|
|
|
$
|
1,509
|
|
|
$
|
10,869
|
|
|
$
|
18,704
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
15,173
|
|
Troubled Debt Restructuring.
The Bank did not restructure any troubled debt during the quarter ended June 30, 2012.
NOTE 8 – Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment Losses
The following table summarizes
gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the investments have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012:
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
June 30, 2012:
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Debt securities issued by states of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of the states
|
|
$
|
9,024
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
1,517
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
10,541
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other U.S. government corporations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and agencies
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
6,866
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
7,475
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
15,890
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
2,126
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
18,016
|
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Total temporarily impaired and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other than temporarily impaired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities
|
|
$
|
15,890
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
2,639
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
18,529
|
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities issued by states of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of the states
|
|
$
|
3,212
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,212
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other U.S. government corporations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and agencies
|
|
|
11,219
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
12,721
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
6,469
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
|
20,900
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
23,633
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Other-than-temporarily impaired securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Total temporarily impaired and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other than temporarily impaired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities
|
|
$
|
20,900
|
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
$
|
3,105
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
24,005
|
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
Management has assessed
the securities which are classified as available-for-sale and in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2012 and determined the
decline in fair value below amortized cost to be temporary, except for those securities described below. In making this determination
management considered the period of time the securities were in a loss position, the percentage decline in comparison to the securities’
amortized cost, the financial condition of the issuer and the Company’s ability and intent to hold these securities until
their fair value recovers to their amortized cost. Management believes the decline in fair value is primarily related to the current
interest rate environment and not to the credit deterioration of the individual issuer, except for those securities described below.
Management evaluates securities
for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant
such evaluation. The investment securities portfolio is generally evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment under ASC 320-10,
“
Investments – Debt and Equity Securities
.” However, certain purchased beneficial interests, including
non-agency mortgage-backed securities and pooled trust preferred securities are evaluated using ASC 325-40,
“Beneficial
Interests in Securitized Financial Assets.”
For those debt securities
for which the fair value of the security is less than its amortized cost and the Company does not intend to sell such security
and it is more likely than not that it will not be required to sell such security prior to the recovery of its amortized cost basis
less any credit losses, ASC 320-10 requires that the credit component of the other-than-temporary impairment losses be recognized
in earnings while the noncredit component is recognized in other comprehensive loss, net of related taxes.
Activity related to the
credit component recognized in earnings on debt securities held by the Company for which a portion of other-than-temporary impairment
was recognized in other comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 is as follows:
|
|
Non-Agency
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance, April 1, 2012
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
Additions for the credit component on debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
in which other-than-temporary impairment was
|
|
|
|
|
not previously recognized
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2012
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
In accordance with ASC
320-10, the Company estimated the portion of loss attributable to credit using a discounted cash flow model. Significant inputs
for the non-agency mortgage-backed securities included the estimated cash flows of the underlying collateral based on key assumptions,
such as default rate, loss severity and prepayment rate. Assumptions used can vary widely from loan to loan, and are influenced
by such factors as loan interest rate, geographical location of the borrower, borrower characteristics and collateral type. The
present value of the expected cash flows was compared to the Company’s holdings to determine the credit-related impairment
loss. Based on the expected cash flows derived from the model, the Company expects to recover the remaining unrealized losses on
non-agency mortgage-backed securities. Significant assumptions used in the valuation of non-agency mortgage-backed securities were
as follows as of June 30, 2012.
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Prepayment rates
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
20.1
|
%
|
Default rates
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
Loss severity
|
|
|
46.7
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
NOTE 9 – Fair Value
Measurement Disclosures
The following table
presents the fair value disclosures of assets and liabilities in accordance with ASC 820-10 which became effective for the Company’s
consolidated financial statements on April 1, 2008. The fair value hierarchy established by this guidance is based on observable
and unobservable inputs participants use to price an asset or liability. ASC 820-10 has prioritized these inputs into the
following fair value hierarchy:
Level
1 Inputs
– Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are available at the
measurement date.
Level
2 Inputs
– Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices
for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived
principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.
Level
3 Inputs
– Unobservable inputs for determining the fair value of the asset or liability and are based on the entity’s
own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use to price the asset or liability.
The following summarizes assets measured
at fair value on a recurring basis for the period ending:
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting date Using:
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
Level 1
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Level 2
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Level 3
|
|
June 30, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities issued by the U.S.
Treasury and other U.S.
government corporations and
agencies
|
|
$
|
4,611
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
4,261
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Debt securities issued by states of
the United States and political
subdivisions of the states
|
|
|
26,529
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
25,282
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
26,682
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,682
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
57,822
|
|
|
$
|
1,178
|
|
|
$
|
56,225
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities issued by the U.S.
Treasury and other U.S.
government corporations and
agencies
|
|
$
|
6,470
|
|
|
$
|
1,369
|
|
|
$
|
5,101
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Debt securities issued by states of
the United States and political
subdivisions of the states
|
|
|
25,361
|
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
|
23,420
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
29,756
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
29,746
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
61,587
|
|
|
$
|
3,320
|
|
|
$
|
58,267
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Under certain circumstances
we make adjustments to fair value for our assets and liabilities although they are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis.
The following table presents the financial instruments carried on the consolidated balance sheet by caption and by level in the
fair value hierarchy at June 30, 2012, for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded.
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
6,294
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,294
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,225
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7,225
|
|
The following
are the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities at June 30, 2012:
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
66,938
|
|
|
$
|
66,938
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
66,938
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
57,822
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
56,228
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
57,822
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
559,562
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
569,813
|
|
|
|
569,813
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
587,488
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
591,639
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
591,639
|
|
Advanced payments by borrowers for taxes
and insurance
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
32,508
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
34,607
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
34,607
|
|
Securities sold under agreements
to repurchase
|
|
|
28,477
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28,478
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28,478
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
3,929
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
Due to Broker
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following are the
carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities at March 31, 2012:
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
62,064
|
|
|
$
|
62,064
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
62,064
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
61,587
|
|
|
|
3,320
|
|
|
|
58,267
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
61,587
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
552,246
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
564,037
|
|
|
|
564,037
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
581,268
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
585,961
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
585,961
|
|
Advanced payments by borrowers for taxes
and insurance
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
33,044
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
35,314
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
35,314
|
|
Securities sold under agreements
to repurchase
|
|
|
27,752
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
27,753
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
27,753
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
3,927
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
Due to Broker
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 10 – OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
Other comprehensive income for the quarters ended
June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Effects
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
(150
|
)
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains in net income
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
Other comprehensive benefit – director fee continuation plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Effects
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
665
|
|
|
$
|
(217
|
)
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains in net income
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Other comprehensive benefit – director fee continuation plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
|
$
|
(197
|
)
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income consists of the following as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes
(1)
|
|
$
|
618
|
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
Unrecognized director fee plan benefits, net of tax
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
|
$
|
459
|
|
(1)
The June 30 and March 31, 2012
ending balance includes $113,000 and $82,000, respectively of unrealized losses in which other-than-temporary impairment has been
recognized.
Item 2.
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations
.
The following analysis
discusses changes in the financial condition and results of operations at and for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011,
and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, appearing
in Part I, Item 1 of this document.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report
contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the
safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is
including this statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain
assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Company, are generally identified by use of the words
“believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project”
or similar expressions. By identifying these forward-looking statements for you in this manner, we are alerting you to the possibility
that our actual results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results and financial condition
indicated in these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to
differ from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include, among others, those discussed under “Risk Factors”
in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and Part II, Item 1A of this Report on Form 10-Q, as well
as the following factors: interest rates, general economic conditions, legislation and regulations, monetary and fiscal policies
of the U.S. government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the quality or composition of the
loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in the Company’s
market area, accounting principles and guidelines, and our ability to recognize enhancements related to our acquisition within
expected time frames. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance
should not be placed on such statements.
Except as required
by applicable law and regulation, the Company does not undertake – and specifically disclaims any obligation – to
publicly release the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
Merger Agreement With United Financial Bancorp,
Inc.
On May 30, 2012, the Company entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with United Financial Bancorp, Inc. (“United Financial”),
the holding company of United Bank, pursuant to which the Company will merge with and into United Financial, with United Financial
as the surviving entity (the “Merger”). In addition, the Bank will merge with and into United Bank, with United Bank
as the surviving entity. Additional information regarding the Merger is provided in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012 under the heading “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations— Merger Agreement With United Financial Bancorp, Inc.” and the Company’s other filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Comparison of Financial
Condition at June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012
Assets
Total assets were $733.0
million at June 30, 2012, an increase of $6.5 million compared to $726.5 million at March 31, 2012. The increase in total assets
was primarily due to a $4.9 million increase in cash and cash equivalents and a $7.3 million increase in net loans, partially offset
by a $3.8 million decrease in investment securities.
Liabilities
Total liabilities were
$660.3 million at June 30, 2012, an increase of $7.2 million compared to $653.1 million at March 31, 2012. The increase in total
liabilities was caused primarily by a $6.2 million increase in total deposits and a $1.3 million increase in advance payments by
borrowers for taxes and insurance, partially offset by the $536,000 decrease in FHLB advances. At June 30, 2012, deposits are comprised
of savings accounts totaling $84.4 million, money market deposit accounts totaling $123.7 million, demand and NOW accounts totaling
$93.2 million, and certificates of deposits totaling $286.3 million. The Company’s core deposits, which the Company considers
to be all deposits except for certificates of deposits, increased to 51.3% of total deposits at June 30, 2012 from 50.4% at March
31, 2012.
Stockholders’ Equity
Total stockholders’
equity decreased $700,000 to $72.7 million at June 30, 2012 from $73.4 million at March 31, 2012. The decrease was primarily caused
by share repurchases of $1.5 million and dividends paid of $170,000 partially offset by net income of $801,000 and an increase
in other comprehensive income of $160,000.
Comparison of Operating
Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011
General
The Company’s results
of operations depend primarily on net interest and dividend income, which is the difference between the interest and dividend income
earned on its interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest expense on its interest-bearing liabilities,
such as deposits and borrowings. The Company also generates noninterest income, primarily from fees and service charges. Gains
on sales of securities and increases in cash surrender value of life insurance policies are additional sources of noninterest income.
The Company’s noninterest expense primarily consists of employee compensation and benefits, occupancy and equipment expense,
FDIC insurance assessments, advertising and promotion, data processing, professional fees and other operating expense.
Net Income
For the three months
ended June 30, 2012, the Company reported net income of $801,000, compared to $779,000 for the year ago period. Basic and diluted
income per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 were $0.14 each, compared to $0.13 each for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.
Excluding acquisition related expenses of $510,000, net income would have been $1.3 million, or $0.23 per diluted share, for the
quarter ended June 30, 2012.
Net Interest and Dividend
Income
Net interest and dividend
income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 totaled $5.7 million and $5.6 million, respectively. The Company’s
net interest margin was 3.45% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 3.53% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The
decrease in the net interest margin for the quarter was primarily due to a 35 basis point decrease in the rate earned on interest-earning
assets and an increase in average interest-earning assets of $34.7 million, partially offset by a $22.6 million increase in average
interest-bearing liabilities and a 30 basis point decrease in the yield paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The changes to the
yield on average interest-earning assets and the rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities caused the Company’s interest
rate spread to decrease from 3.28% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 to 3.23% for the quarter ended June 30, 2012.
Interest and dividend
income amounted to $7.9 million and $8.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease
in interest and dividend income resulted from a decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets, partially offset by an
increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets. The yield earned on average interest-earning assets decreased 35 basis
points to 4.75% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from 5.10% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Average interest-earning
assets were $676.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to $642.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.
The increase in average interest-earning assets was caused primarily by a $7.6 million increase in average interest bearing demand
deposits with other banks and a $28.6 million increase in net loans, partially offset by a $1.2 million decrease in average investment
securities.
Interest expense for
the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $2.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The decrease in interest expense resulted
from a decrease in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, partially offset by an increase in the average balance
of interest-bearing liabilities. The average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 1.52% for the quarter ended
June 30, 2012 from 1.82% for the year ago period, due primarily to the decrease in rates paid on certificates of deposit, money
market deposit accounts and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and a decrease in FHLB advances which generally have
higher rates. The average rate paid on certificates of deposit decreased from 2.40% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 to 2.07%
for the current year quarter as market rates have decreased for this type of deposit. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased
$22.6 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 from $555.9 million to $578.5 million primarily due to a $23.2 million increase
in average interest-bearing deposits and a $5.3 million increase in average repurchase agreement accounts partially offset by a
$6.1 million decrease in average FHLB advances.
Average Balance Sheet
The following table presents
information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income and dividends
from average interest-earning assets and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities and the resulting average yields
and costs. The yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balances of
assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented, and are presented on an annualized basis.
|
|
For the Quarters Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold, interest-bearing
deposits and marketable
equity securities
|
|
$
|
54,914
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
|
$
|
47,345
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
Investments in available-for-sale
securities, other than mortgage-backed
and mortgage-related securities
(1)
|
|
|
29,889
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
|
|
|
26,064
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
|
Mortgage-backed and mortgage-related
securities
|
|
|
27,584
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
32,592
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and Bankers’ Bank stock
|
|
|
4,415
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
4,741
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
560,123
|
|
|
|
7,480
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
|
|
|
531,487
|
|
|
|
7,515
|
|
|
|
5.67
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
676,925
|
|
|
|
8,012
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
|
|
|
642,229
|
|
|
|
8,161
|
|
|
|
5.10
|
|
Noninterest-earning assets
|
|
|
39,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
10,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
727,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
691,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
$
|
83,401
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
%
|
|
$
|
77,743
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
18,807
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
16,603
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
124,805
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
107,108
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
Certificate accounts
|
|
|
287,070
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
289,465
|
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
514,083
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
490,919
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and
subordinated debentures
|
|
|
36,617
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
3.32
|
|
|
|
42,722
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
Advanced payments by borrowers for taxes and
insurance
|
|
|
2,204
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
25,582
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
20,248
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
578,486
|
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
555,926
|
|
|
|
2,517
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
|
68,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
7,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
654,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
72,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
727,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
691,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and dividend income/net
interest rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,815
|
|
|
|
3.23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,644
|
|
|
|
3.28
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.53
|
%
|
Ratio of interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
117.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Reported on a tax equivalent
basis, using a 34% tax rate.
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table sets
forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest and dividend income. The rate column shows the effects attributable
to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in
volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this
table, changes attributable to changes in both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately based
on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.
|
|
Quarter Ended
June 30, 2012
Compared to
Quarter Ended
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
Due to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Both
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold, interest-bearing
deposits and marketable equity securities
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
Investments in available-for-sale securities,
other than mortgage-backed and
mortgage-related securities
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage-backed and mortgage-related
securities
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and Bankers’ Bank stock
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
(1,675
|
)
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
(2,198
|
)
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Certificate accounts
|
|
|
(956
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
Total Deposits
|
|
|
(1,261
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and
subordinated debentures
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Advanced payments by borrowers for taxes
and insurance
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
(1,234
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
918
|
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
Increase in net interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
(964
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,651
|
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for
loan losses for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were $360,000 and $359,000, respectively. The additions to the allowance
for loan losses reflected continued growth in the commercial loan portfolio and the challenging economic climate.
Noninterest Income
For the quarter ended
June 30, 2012, noninterest income was $904,000 compared to $580,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Affecting noninterest
income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were gains of $197,000 on the sales of securities and $120,000 in gains on the
sale of loans.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense
for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 was $4.7 million compared to $4.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The increase
was due largely to $510,000 in merger related expenses, partially offset by a $154,000 decrease in salaries and benefits, a $77,000
decrease in occupancy and equipment expense, a $71,000 decrease in the FDIC insurance assessment and a $52,000 decrease in the
write-down of other real estate owned. The Company’s efficiency ratio improved from 74.8% for the quarter ended June 30,
2011 to 71.4% for the current year quarter. Without the merger related expenses, the efficiency ratio would have improved to 63.7%
this quarter.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Company recorded
income tax expense of $730,000 and $411,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, with effective tax rates
of 47.7% and 34.5%, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate is due to merger related expenses that are not tax deductible.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
The term liquidity
refers to the ability of the Company to meet current and future short-term financial obligations. The Company further defines liquidity
as the ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to fund loan originations, deposit withdrawals and operating expenses. Liquidity
management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. The Bank’s primary sources of liquidity are deposits,
scheduled amortization and prepayments of loan principal and mortgage-related securities, funds provided by operations and borrowings.
The Bank can borrow funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank based on eligible collateral of loans and securities. The Bank had Federal
Home Loan Bank borrowings as of June 30, 2012 of $32.5 million, with unused borrowing capacity of $30.5 million.
The Company’s
primary investing activities are the origination of loans and the purchase of mortgage and investment securities. During the three
months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 the Company originated loans, net of principal paydowns, of approximately $7.8 million and
$3.5 million, respectively. Purchases of investment securities totaled $10.4 million and $7.5 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Loan repayment and
maturing investment securities are a relatively predictable source of funds. However, deposit flows, calls of investment securities
and prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are strongly influenced by interest rates, general and local economic conditions
and competition in the marketplace. These factors reduce the predictability of the timing of these sources of funds. Total deposits
were $587.5 million at June 30, 2012, a $6.2 million increase from the $581.3 million balance at March 31, 2012.
At June 30, 2012,
the Company had outstanding commitments to originate $23.9 million of loans, and unused lines of credit and undvanced funds on
construction loans of approximately $54.2 million. In addition, the Company had $2.6 million of commercial letters of credit. Management
of the Bank anticipates that the Bank will have sufficient funds to meet its current loan commitments. Retail certificates of deposit
scheduled to mature in one year or less totaled $135.3 million, or 23.0% of total deposits at June 30, 2012. The Company relies
on competitive rates, customer service and long-standing relationships with customers to retain deposits. Based on the Company’s
experience with deposit retention and current retention strategies, management believes that, although it is not possible to predict
future terms and conditions upon renewal, a significant portion of such deposits will remain with the Company.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company and the
Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject. The Company’s capital amounts and ratios as of June
30, 2012 are presented in the following table.
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
New England Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Required
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Tier 1 Capital
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
$
|
58,385
|
|
|
|
8.23
|
%
|
Total Risk-Based Capital
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
$
|
64,200
|
|
|
|
11.96
|
%
|
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
$
|
58,385
|
|
|
|
10.87
|
%
|
The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios
as of June 30, 2012 are presented in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital
|
|
|
Prompt Corrective
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adequacy Purposes
|
|
|
Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
|
|
$
|
61,334
|
|
|
|
11.42
|
%
|
|
$
|
42,969
|
|
|
|
>
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
53,711
|
|
|
|
>
10.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
|
|
|
55,519
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
|
|
21,484
|
|
|
|
>
4.0
|
|
|
|
32,227
|
|
|
|
>
6.0
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
|
|
|
55,519
|
|
|
|
7.83
|
|
|
|
28,365
|
|
|
|
>
4.0
|
|
|
|
35,456
|
|
|
|
>
5.0
|
|
Management is not
aware of any known trends, events or uncertainties that will have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Company’s
or the Bank’s liquidity, capital or operations, nor is management aware of any current recommendations by regulatory authorities
which, if implemented, would have a material effect on the Company’s or the Bank’s liquidity, capital or operations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course
of operations, the Bank engages in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
are not recorded in its financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate
and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan
commitments, lines of credit and letters of credit.
For the three months
ended June 30, 2012, the Bank did not engage in off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 3.
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Interest Rate Risk Management
The Bank manages the interest
rate sensitivity of its interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets in an effort to minimize the adverse effects of
changes in the interest rate environment. Deposit accounts typically react more quickly to changes in market interest rates than
mortgage loans because of the shorter maturities of deposits. As a result, sharp increases in interest rates may adversely affect
the Bank’s earnings while decreases in interest rates may beneficially affect its earnings. To reduce the potential volatility
of its earnings, the Bank has sought to improve the match between asset and liability maturities and rates, while maintaining an
acceptable interest rate spread. Also, the Bank attempts to manage its interest rate risk through: its investment portfolio; an
increased focus on commercial and multi-family and commercial real estate lending, which emphasizes the origination of shorter-term
adjustable-rate loans; and efforts to originate adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans. In addition, the Bank sells a portion
of its originated long-term, fixed-rate one- to four-family residential loans in the secondary market. The Bank currently does
not participate in hedging programs, interest rate swaps or other activities involving the use of off-balance sheet derivative
financial instruments.
The Bank has an Asset/Liability
Committee, which includes members of both the board of directors and management, to communicate, coordinate and control all aspects
involving asset/liability management. The committees establishes and monitors the volume, maturities, pricing and mix of assets
and funding sources with the objective of managing assets and funding sources to provide results that are consistent with liquidity,
growth, risk limits and profitability goals.
Net Interest Income Simulation
Analysis
The Bank analyzes its interest
rate sensitivity position to manage the risk associated with interest rate movements through the use of interest income simulation.
The matching of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to which such assets and liabilities are “interest
sensitive.” An asset or liability is said to be interest rate sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature or
reprice within that time period.
The Bank’s goal is
to manage asset and liability positions to moderate the effects of interest rate fluctuations on net interest income. Interest
income simulations are completed quarterly and presented to the Asset/Liability Committee. The simulations provide an estimate
of the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income under a range of assumptions. The numerous assumptions used in
the simulation processes are reviewed by the Asset/Liability Committee on a quarterly basis. Changes to these assumptions can significantly
affect the results of the simulation. The simulations incorporate assumptions regarding the potential timing in the repricing of
certain assets and liabilities when market rates change and the changes in spreads between different market rates. The simulation
analyses incorporate managements’ current assessment of the risk that pricing margins will change adversely over time due
to competition or other factors.
The simulation analyses
are only an estimate of the Bank’s interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time. The Bank continually reviews
the potential effect changes in interest rates could have on the repayment of rate sensitive assets and funding requirements of
rate sensitive liabilities.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures.
The Company’s
management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness
of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in
the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)
(1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2)
is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There has been no
change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter
that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
.
The Company is not
involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. Such
routine legal proceedings, in the aggregate, are believed by management to be immaterial to the Company’s financial condition
or results of operations.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
.
There have been no material
changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,
2012. The risks described in our Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks not presently known to the
Company, or that we currently deem immaterial, may also adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition or results
of operations.
Item 2.
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
.
The Company repurchased
140,361 shares of its common stock in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 as follows:
For the three
months ended
June 30, 2012
|
|
Total shares
repurchased
|
|
|
Average
price paid
per share
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares
that May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or Programs
|
|
April
|
|
|
137,600
|
|
|
$
|
10.66
|
|
|
|
329,496
|
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
May
|
|
|
2,761
|
|
|
|
10.62
|
|
|
|
332,257
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
June
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
332,257
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
140,361
|
|
|
$
|
10.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company’s stock
repurchase program was authorized August 29, 2011 to repurchase 332,257 shares of the Company’s outstanding shares. Stock
repurchases were made from time to time and were effected through open market purchases, block trades and in privately negotiated
transactions.
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
.
None.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
Item 5.
Other Information
.
None.
Item 6.
Exhibits
.
|
2.1
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between New England Bancshares, Inc. and United Financial Bancorp, Inc.
(4)
|
|
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation of New England Bancshares, Inc.
(1)
|
|
3.2
|
Bylaws of New England Bancshares, Inc.
(2)
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen stock certificate of New England Bancshares, Inc.
(2)
|
|
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
(3)
|
|
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
(3)
|
|
32.1
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
(3)
|
|
32.2
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
(3)
|
|
101
|
Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30,
2012 and March 31, 2012, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended June 30,
2012 and 2011, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and
(iv) the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3)
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated by reference into this document from the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (No. 333-128277) as filed on September
13, 2005.
|
|
(2)
|
Incorporated by reference into this document from Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on October 11, 2007.
|
|
(3)
|
This information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
(4)
|
Incorporated by reference into this document from Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K as filed by New England Bancshares, Inc. with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 31, 2012.
|
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of
the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
August 14, 2012
|
By
:/s/ Jeffrey J. Levitsky
|
|
Jeffrey J. Levitsky
|
|
Interim Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(principal financial officer)
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
August 14, 2012
|
By
:/s/ David J. O’Connor
|
|
David J. O’Connor
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
New England Bancshares, Inc. (MM) (NASDAQ:NEBS)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Dez 2024 até Jan 2025
New England Bancshares, Inc. (MM) (NASDAQ:NEBS)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Jan 2024 até Jan 2025