ITEM
1. BUSINESS
Overview
On
January 19, 2010 we were incorporated as Cumberland Hills Ltd. in the State of Nevada. On August 26, 2013, we changed our name
to American Heritage International Inc., increased our authorized common stock from 200,000,000 shares, par value $0.001, to 500,000,000
shares, par value $0.001, and authorized the issuance of up to 20,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. On August 26, 2013, we designated
a class of Preferred Stock entitled Series “A” Convertible Preferred Stock, consisting of 15,300 shares, par value
$0.001. Holders of Series “A” Convertible Preferred Stock will participate on an equal basis per-share with holders
of our common stock in any distribution upon winding up, dissolution, or liquidation. Holders of Series “A” Preferred
Stock may convert their shares into shares of our common stock on the basis of 10,000 shares of common stock for every 1 share
of Series “A” Preferred Stock converted. Holders are further entitled to vote together with the holders of our common
stock on all matters submitted to shareholders at a rate of 10,000 votes for each share held.
On
August 28, 2013, we entered into an Agreement of Conveyance, Transfer and Assignment of Assets and Assumption of Obligations (the
“Sale Agreement”) with our prior officer and director and a non-affiliated investor. Pursuant to the Sale Agreement,
we transferred all assets and business operations associated with our paper products business in exchange for assumption of all
obligations associated with that business and the cancellation of $112,841 of debt owing to our prior officer and director and
non-affiliated investor. Furthermore, our former officer and director agreed to return to treasury and cancel 46,500,000 shares
held by him; and a shareholder agreed to forfeit the right to 4,000,000 common shares not yet issued but due to him. Also, our
former officer and director agreed to transfer 36,000,000 common shares to our newly appointed officers/directors. These transactions
resulted in a change of control of our company. The cancellation of debt, net of property and equipment transferred, totaling
$109,698, was recorded as additional paid-in capital. As a result of this agreement, we are no longer pursuing our paper products
business.
Contemporaneously,
on August 28, 2013, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with American Heritage
LLC and its principals. Under the Purchase Agreement, we acquired certain intellectual property related to the electronic cigarette
business in exchange for 15,300 shares of our newly created Series “A” Convertible Preferred Stock valued at $25,000
in total. We intend to take advantage of the rapid growth of the electronic cigarette industry and become one of the market leaders.
We have taken delivery of our first order of electronic cigarettes and are in the process of fulfilling sales orders.
Business
Electronic
Cigarettes
An
electronic cigarette, or e-cigarette, was invented in 2003 by Chinese pharmacist Hon Lik, with the intent to provide a satisfying
and safe alternative for the delivery of nicotine. This delivery is through the lungs via an atomized water and nicotine cartridge
with a device that looks, feels, and tastes like a traditional tobacco cigarette. The device uses heat, or in some cases ultrasonic,
to vaporize a propylene glycol- or glycerin-based liquid solution into an aerosol mist, similar to the way a nebulizer or humidifier
vaporizes solutions for inhalation.
It
provides the customer with an alternative to traditional cigarettes without the negative and health issues associated with the
smoking of tobacco products. The product allows the smoker to smoke practically everywhere, while reducing the risks to the smoker’s
health, and the people around them. Additionally, the electronic cigarette saves the smoker money, as it is a more cost effective
alternative to tobacco products.
Since
its introduction, the electronic cigarette technology has undergone numerous changes. Despite the upgrades, many companies in
the industry still use older technologies. Original variants required the user to inject the liquid nicotine formula manually,
while early self-contained cartridges leak. Currently there are now over seven manufacturers in China and over forty companies
marketing variants of electronic cigarettes.
Most
electronic cigarettes are designed to resemble actual tobacco smoking implements, such as cigarettes, cigars, or pipes, but many
take other device forms, often used designs are those more practical to house the mechanisms involved. Many are also reusable,
with replaceable and refillable parts, but some models are disposable. Some companies market the product as a smoking cessation
device, but this can be controversial as it opens up legal issues in marketing. We prefer to market it for what it really is,
an alternative to smoking tobacco based cigarettes.
Electronic
cigarettes generally consist of three primary components: a cartridge, an atomizer, and a battery unit. Some designs implement
a disposable integrated cartridge/atomizer component known as a cartomizer. Most reusable electronic cigarette models are manufactured
according to some standard for their connections, making their components interchangeable.
The
cartridge is a small, usually disposable, plastic container with openings on each end. It generally houses an absorbent, sponge-like
material saturated with the liquid solution to be vaporized. The mouthpiece is constructed so that the vapor produced can flow
past the solution container to reach the user's mouth. When the liquid in the cartridge has been depleted, the user can replace
it with another pre-filled cartridge.
The
atomizer is a heating element that serves to vaporize the solution so it can be inhaled. It contains a filament whose efficiency
degrades over time due to a buildup of sediment, or "burns out" entirely, requiring replacement. This creates one of
the primary recurring expenses associated with electronic cigarettes.
To
deal with atomizer degradation and the associated expense, manufacturers introduced an integrated cartridge/atomizer component
that is more cheaply produced, known as a cartomizer. They are generally sold in packages of five or more. When their heating
elements degrade, they can be disposed of and replaced more cheaply than standalone atomizers.
Most
electronic cigarettes are powered by a lithium-ion rechargeable battery. The housing for the battery and electronic circuitry
is usually the largest component of an electronic cigarette. It is generally referred to simply as the battery. This unit may
contain an electronic airflow sensor for automated operation, or a button for manual operation. A timed cut-off switch (to prevent
overheating) and/or a colored LED may also be included here. To recharge their batteries, many different types of battery chargers
– such as AC outlet, car, and USB – are usually available. Some manufacturers also offer a "Portable Charging
Case," or "PCC", which contains a large rechargeable battery that is then used to charge a smaller battery within
the individual electronic cigarette. Another power option is direct USB power, which is available for most electronic cigarette
models. An USB-tethered module is attached to the cigarette in place of a battery, and must be plugged into a computer's USB port
or a USB AC adapter in order to operate.
Liquids
used to produce vapor in electronic cigarettes are also sold separately for use in refillable cartridges. Liquid is commonly known
as "nicotine solution" when it contains the actual nicotine component.
Liquid
solution consists of flavoring and/or nicotine dissolved in one or several hygroscopic components, which turns the water in the
solution into the smoke-like vapor when heated. The most commonly used hygroscopic components are propylene glycol, vegetable
glycerin or polyethylene glycol 400, usually referred to as PG, VG and PEG 400, respectively. All three are common food additives
and used in a variety of pharmaceutical formulations. Since concerns have been raised by various opponent groups regarding the
safety of inhaling these substances, it has been pointed out by proponents that PG has been used as an additive in asthma inhalers
and nebulizers since the 1950s, with no serious adverse side effects, and because of its water-retaining properties, is the compound
of choice for delivering atomized medication. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) include propylene glycol on its list
of substances Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS), and it meets the requirements of acceptable compounds within Title 21 of the
Code of Federal Regulations. We intend to avoid the controversies of propylene glycol by using vegetable glycerin.
Liquid
solutions containing nicotine are available in differing nicotine concentrations to suit user preferences. Concentrations range
from zero nicotine to high nicotine (24mg). Nicotine is an alkaloid found in the nightshade family of plants that constitutes
approximately 0.6–3.0% of the dry weight of tobacco, with biosynthesis taking place in the roots and accumulation occurring
in the leaves. According to the American Heart Association, nicotine addiction has historically been one of the hardest addictions
to break, while the pharmacological and behavioral characteristics that determine tobacco addiction are similar to those determining
addiction to heroin and cocaine. Nicotine content in cigarettes has slowly increased over the years, and one study found that
there was an average increase of 1.6% per year between the years of 1998 and 2005. This was found for all major market categories
of cigarettes.
Our
Products
Our
premium disposable electronic cigarettes are sold under the brand “American Heritage™” “America’s
Original E-Cig™” in four varieties: Platinum (24mg), Full Flavour Red (18mg), Cobalt Blue (9mg), and Emerald
Menthol (9mg). They are sold in single packs or variety packs containing three sticks. With a soft filter we feel we are at the
forefront in terms of realistic look and feel. American Heritage™ utilizes the most current technology in the industry and
uses food grade quality E-Juice produced in the United States . We believe that our premium disposable electronic cigarettes will
be the most effective, best tasting, highest quality, and easiest to use e-cigarettes in the marketplace. Marketed solely as an
alternative to traditional tobacco cigarettes, we intend that our products will be supported and used by entertainers and athletes,
and be an in demand product.
Our
premium electronic cigarette and its components work in conjunction as follows: user draws on the Electronic Cigarette, a sensor
detects inhalation, a microprocessor activates, igniting the lithium ion battery, the battery charges the heater, the heater vaporizes
the liquid nicotine held in vegetable glycerin, simultaneously the LED lights up and the user get the smoking experience.
Each
disposable electronic cigarette will be good for about 350 draws or puffs, and the battery will last approximately 300 charges.
Our
products contain only 4 ingredients versus the more than 4,000 ingredients and chemicals in cigarettes. Our products
are free of tar and other chemical substances which are produced in traditional cigarettes. Our products are non-flammable (products
do contain a lithium battery which carries certain risks if ignited) and our products lack the second-hand smoke that accompanies
traditional cigarettes. There is no danger of second hand smoke and it is reusable (rechargeable by an electric outlet or car
charger) so there is no problem with disposing of cigarette buds or ashes. The United States Food and Drug Administration (“
FDA
”)
has not fully studied the possible health effects of e-cigarette products. Although certain cities, businesses and providers of
transportation have banned the use of e-cigarettes, we believe we provide consumers an opportunity to smoke in additional places
without the social stigmas increasingly associated with traditional cigarettes.
We
plan to further develop our brand and increase sales by adding additional products on a regular basis. As a general rule with
mass retail distribution, the more available SKU’s (SKU refers to a Stock Keeping Unit, a unique identifier for each distinct
product that can be purchased) that the retailer or distributor can carry from a particular company, the more appealing it is
to increase business with the company.
Most
smokers enjoy the substantial and emotional feeling of smoking. Research reveals that the hand-to-mouth behavior associated with
smoking is habitual and very difficult to break, one reason why smoking cessation gums or patches have only limited effectiveness. We
provide smokers an experience similar to smoking a traditional cigarette without the fire, flame, tobacco, tar, carbon monoxide,
ash, stub or smell found in real cigarettes.
Operations
Electronic
cigarettes are a relatively new category that has only started to gain consumer traction in the past three years. The category
is comprised of 1st/2nd generation products, with only minor evolutions in product functionality and cosmetics since inception
to become “more real cigarette like” in taste, feel, and appearance. The products are expected to evolve annually,
and we believe will continue to improve in functionality over time. The existing products in their existing forms will likely
have another 1-2 years before further evolution is required. All major suppliers source virtually all of their components
from China, with a few suppliers sourcing flavoring systems in the United States. There are multiple sources for production
of electronic cigarettes in the People’s Republic of China, with most major competitors sourcing from 2-3 major factories,
the same ones utilized by us. Warehousing and transportation is performed and/or organized either by the producers, or set
up independently. Payments to manufacturers are typically 100% upfront with few brand owners enjoying terms of any kind. We
have negotiated terms of 50% down at time of purchase order with remainder due upon production completion. FEDEX, DHL,
container shipping, and other major global shippers and freight forwarders are all involved in the supply chain.
Manufacturing
We
currently do not have any written agreements in place to manufacture our products. We believe that it is important, however, to
maintain multiple sources, as to not create a complete dependence on one source, and we intend to open relationships with the
manufacturers that can create the high quality products we demand.
Currently,
there are seven primary manufacturers of Electronic Cigarettes in China, and as typical in Asia there will be more factories coming
on line as the product category continues to grow. Our manufacturer is the current leader in the manufacture of disposable premium
electronic cigarettes, with three factories in Shenzhen, a dedicated R&D team, full testing facilities, and a packaging plant.
Their R&D team includes engineers and chemists capable and proven in the creation of new, high quality products. We will source
the same product from another supplier to ensure redundancy of supply. The scale of our supplier is such that there is very
little risk of product shortage. Product quality is an issue with many of the smaller suppliers in the industry. We
have installed quality control procedures, testing and control mechanisms, and as a result, we have enjoyed essentially uninterrupted
high quality supply.
Our
Market
The
electronic cigarette market is a fast growth industry with significant sales opportunities. The industry is appealing from a business
standpoint as it boasts strong profit margins, repeatable purchases on a regular basis, and rapid growth potential as more people
are made aware of the product. Current advances in technology and quality of product have greatly accelerated the product category,
and as it continues to garner mainstream recognition the electronic cigarette market will continue to expand exponentially. The
market is unique, in that it is created by the vast and expanding demographic of tobacco cigarette market, of which its users
inevitably look for an alternative to smoking tobacco cigarettes.
Electronic
cigarettes have now been on the worldwide market for over seven years and in the United States market for about four years. Initially
a novelty product with minimal sales, in 2010, the electronic cigarette market was over $100 million in sales. The electronic
cigarette doubled in sales in 2011 to be a $200 million annual industry. As electronic cigarettes find their way into mass retail,
industry experts estimate that the market is worth nearly $2 billion; although that is just a fraction of the $91 billion-a-year
tobacco industry in the United States. Analysts at Wells Fargo recently estimated that e-cigarettes could replace regular cigarettes
within the next decade.
Electronic
cigarettes were historically an online business and sold in specialty retail. Over the past few years, the business has expanded
to traditional retail and is now one of the fastest growing segments in the convenience, gas, and drug channels, with distribution
in over 100,000 outlets in the United States. According to the Tobacco Vapor Electronic Cigarette Association, the United States
is the largest market at over $1 billion in revenue, doubling every year, comprising approximately 60% of global demand. The
United States traditional cigarette market is estimated at just over $91 billion annually, coming from 60 million smokers. According
to the national health review, approximately 20 million of these consumers try to quit every year, creating further growth impetus
for the electronic cigarette category.
The
United Kingdom is also a large market followed by various developed markets in Western Europe. However, there is no guarantee
that the global or US markets will continue to grow in the future as anticipated. Most developed markets world-wide are undeveloped,
with South America, Russia, China, and South East Asia holding great promise given the size of the smoking population. We believe
that the vast majority of electronic cigarette users are people trying to switch from regular cigarettes. The total cigarette
market is $720 billion annually coming from 1.3 billion smokers and 6 trillion cigarettes sold. One of the leading industry
analysts predict that electronic cigarettes will eclipse the size of the regular tobacco market within the next ten years, reaching
over $350 billion in size. Over the next ten years, the industry for tobacco cigarettes is expected to increase to over 1.7 billion
smokers worldwide, creating a $900 billion market. Phillip Morris alone sold over 235 billion cigarettes for a profit of $3.3
billion in 2009.
Distribution
methods of the products or services
Our
market approach in United States retail is via brokers and distributors as a way to scale our resources. We believe there is exponential
revenue growth potential for electronic cigarette companies that are able to penetrate mass retail distribution. The initial orders
are sizable, but more importantly the continued servicing of the retail channel with refill units creates residual sales that
compound. If we experience success with our SKUs the retailer is predisposed to look for new product entries from us.
Primary
sales channels will focus on the following distribution channels: grocery and convenience stores, gasoline services stations,
mass retailers, tobacco distributors, warehouse clubs, hotel and casino operations and travel industry distribution groups. To
support primary sales channels and generate market acceptance, direct to consumer channels will be pursued through Internet sales,
direct marketing to consumers, direct marketing to individually owned retail locations and multi-level marketing. We plan to employ
a force of independent brokers who will call on independent retailers to drive additional sales.
Our business operates an online direct to consumer
business and a United States retail business. All our products are available for sale on our ecommerce website at www.americanheritageonline.com. The
online business is comprised of consumers that direct buy via our ecommerce site. Our United States retail business was recently
added, and our products have experienced increased same store sales on a monthly basis, and continued distribution growth to new
outlets. Our first major distributor is Mr. Checkout which is a network of over 1,000 food and beverage distributors providing
direct-store-delivery to independent grocers & convenience stores in the US through a network of convenience store distributors,
wagon jobbers (small distributors), merchandisers and wholesale-to-distributor warehouse companies. Our premium brand of disposable
electronic cigarettes is now on the shelves of over 400 stores. Through these distributions, we have expanded our footprint in
California, Florida, Texas, and New Mexico while entering new markets in New York and Oklahoma.
We
will focus our sales efforts in this realm, and our relationships with high volume sales channels are an important aspect of our
advantage. Long-term relationships with sales channels are critical in the sales process. By having the relationships in place,
we should be able to get our products into the sales channels.
International
business also represents growth potential as we enter into distribution agreements with established partners in major markets
and explore alliances with major tobacco partners in key markets.
Marketing
We
have just begun our active marketing having received our first shipment in December of 2013. We have a leadership team with extensive
experience in the electronic cigarette industry and in brand building. We also have extensive search engine optimization
expertise, now that product has arrived on the shelves of major retail stores we have begun to roll out a much more extensive
online marketing campaign and looking to become one of the highest ranked sites online in electronic cigarettes. In addition
to online marketing, we have made important investments in point of sale marketing material, including permanent racks that enable
impactful displays to consumers and permanent premium product placements. After superior packaging, point of sale marketing
has the highest return on investment of any marketing activity.
We
have recently launched our “Spirit of America” marketing campaign, and have sponsored Bauman Racing in the biggest
off-road race in the United States; the General Tire Mint 400.
Competition
The
Internet marketplace for electronic cigarettes is very competitive with many brands being offered. Blu and Njoy are examples
of the major competitive brands which use the Internet and search engines such as Google placement and Google Keywords to
web search page placement. All electronic cigarettes work in the same way. Consequently, competition is based on availability, brand
development and recognition and price. The competitive environment in the electronic cigarette marketplace currently includes
over forty small companies marketing electronic cigarettes. As the industry begins to gain mainstream market acceptance, we anticipate
larger players will enter the industry.
Direct
Competition
The
largest direct competitors in the electronic cigarette market are:
|
•
|
NJoy
E-Cigarette
|
|
•
|
V2Cigs
|
|
•
|
Maya
|
|
•
|
Smoke
Stick
|
|
•
|
Vapor
Zone
|
|
•
|
Victory
|
|
•
|
Blu
Cig
|
We
believe that some of these competitors are undercapitalized and lack the resources to successfully find funding in a timely and
cost effective manner. Additionally, we believe that some of these competitors are missing a critical component to success, whether
it is lack of capital or management experience, or they lack a premium disposable electronic cigarette brand offering.
Sales
efforts for these companies have been focused on selling their products over the Internet as their main distribution point. Approximately
70% of the industry sales are executed over the Internet and fail to support the customers after the sale has completed. As a
result, their resources are directed to the aspects of online sales; writing blogs, SEO/SEM strategies, electronic reputation,
and the like. Recently a couple of companies have successfully penetrated the mass retail sector. We believe that the timing for
American Heritage™ to enter the marketplace is optimum.
Indirect
Competition
Indirect
competition comes directly from the tobacco cigarette industry. More than competition, it is the basis and foundation of the electronic
cigarette industry. It is a reasonable assumption, and more of an expectation, that an industry leader such as Phillip Morris
or RJ Reynolds will eventually enter the electronic cigarette industry. We have seen no indication that this is on the immediate
horizon, and we believe that they are waiting until the industry matures. We believe that the tobacco conglomerates will enter
the electronic cigarette market sometime in the next five years, and that entrance by acquisition will certainly be part of the
strategy.
Additional
indirect competitors include nicotine delivery systems that are already on the market, such as gums and patches. These are sold
more as smoking cessation products versus smoking alternatives.
Competitive
Edge
We
believe that our timing of entry into the electronic cigarette marketplace is optimum. Existing competitors have incurred significant
marketing costs simply to help generate product awareness, and have yet to generate brand awareness or loyalty. We can enter the
marketplace with a focus on branding, and build off of the product awareness campaigns our competitors have engaged in.
Additionally,
many of the competitors are burdened with a business model and inventory centered on older technologies. We expect to introduce
the latest and most efficient of electronic cigarette technology, and will be the format that finds mainstream market adoption
and success. Designed to address the deficiencies in pre-existing products, our products are not expected to leak, as each cartridge
has a built-in atomizer. Nicotine is self-contained in the cartridge, whereas other products require the consumer to inject the
liquid through an additional bottle. Nicotine amounts are already pre-measured and the product always stays fresh. Most of the
competition also uses propylene glycol as an active ingredient, which is the primary ingredient that has been a barrier to mainstream
acceptance. Our products use all natural vegetable glycerin, which is a critical competitive edge.
Key
Competitive Strengths
|
•
|
Our products incorporate
the most current electronic cigarette technology;
|
|
•
|
Our product technology
platform will be the mainstream preferred and accepted;
|
|
•
|
We use all-natural
vegetable glycerin;
|
|
•
|
Our cumulative experience
and network;
|
|
•
|
Our pre-existing,
long-term working relationships with mass retail distribution;
|
|
•
|
Our experience in
all aspects of product manufacture, marketing, and distribution;
|
|
•
|
Our ability to find
cost effective marketing and branding support from the sports and entertainment industries; and
|
|
•
|
Our access to highly
discounted traditional and electronic media outlets.
|
Intellectual
Property
We
currently use the following trademarks: American Heritage™ and America’s Original E-Cig™ in marketing our products.
Government
Regulation
Based
on the December 2010 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit’s decision in
Sottera, Inc. v. Food & Drug Administration
,
627 F.3d 891 (D.C. Cir. 2010), the United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) is permitted to regulate
electronic cigarettes as “tobacco products” under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009 (the
“Tobacco Control Act”).
Under
this Court decision, the FDA is not permitted to regulate electronic cigarettes as “drugs” or “devices”
or a “combination product” under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act unless they are marketed for therapeutic
purposes.
Because
we do not intend to market our electronic cigarettes for therapeutic purposes, our electronic cigarettes are subject to being
classified as “tobacco products” under the Tobacco Control Act. The Tobacco Control Act grants the FDA broad authority
over the manufacture, sale, marketing and packaging of tobacco products, although the FDA is prohibited from issuing regulations
banning all cigarettes or all smokeless tobacco products, or requiring the reduction of nicotine yields of a tobacco product to
zero.
The
Tobacco Control Act also requires establishment, within the FDA’s new Center for Tobacco Products, of a Tobacco Products
Scientific Advisory Committee to provide advice, information and recommendations with respect to the safety, dependence or health
issues related to tobacco products.
The
Tobacco Control Act imposes significant new restrictions on the advertising and promotion of tobacco products. For example, the
law requires the FDA to finalize certain portions of regulations previously adopted by the FDA in 1996 (which were struck down
by the Supreme Court in 2000 as beyond the FDA’s authority). As written, these regulations would significantly limit the
ability of manufacturers, distributors and retailers to advertise and promote tobacco products, by, for example, restricting the
use of color, graphics and sound effects in advertising, limiting the use of outdoor advertising, restricting the sale and distribution
of non-tobacco items and services, gifts, and sponsorship of events and imposing restrictions on the use for cigarette or smokeless
tobacco products of trade or brand names that are used for non-tobacco products. The law also requires the FDA to issue future
regulations regarding the promotion and marketing of tobacco products sold or distributed over the internet, by mail order or
through other non-face-to-face transactions in order to prevent the sale of tobacco products to minors.
It
is likely that the Tobacco Control Act could result in a decrease in tobacco product sales in the United States, including sales
of our electronic cigarettes.
While
the FDA has not yet mandated electronic cigarettes be regulated as tobacco products, during 2012, the FDA indicated that it intends
to regulate electronic cigarettes under the Tobacco Control Act through the issuance of deeming regulations that would include
electronic cigarettes under the definition of a “tobacco product” under the Tobacco Control Act subject to the FDA’s
jurisdiction. The FDA has announced that it will issue proposed deeming regulations by April 2013. As of the date of this report,
the FDA had not taken such action.
The
application of the Tobacco Control Act to electronic cigarettes could impose, among other things, restrictions on the content
of nicotine in electronic cigarettes, the advertising, marketing and sale of electronic cigarettes, the use of certain flavorings
and the introduction of new products. We cannot predict the scope of such regulations or the impact they may have on our company
specifically or the electronic cigarette industry generally, though if enacted, they could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
In
this regard, total compliance and related costs are not possible to predict and depend substantially on the future requirements
imposed by the FDA under the Tobacco Control Act. Costs, however, could be substantial and could have a material adverse effect
on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, failure to comply with the Tobacco Control Act and
with FDA regulatory requirements could result in significant financial penalties and could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations and ability to market and sell our products. At present, we are not able
to predict whether the Tobacco Control Act will impact us to a greater degree than competitors in the industry, thus affecting
our competitive position.
State
and local governments currently legislate and regulate tobacco products, including what is considered a tobacco product, how tobacco
taxes are calculated and collected, to whom and by whom tobacco products can be sold and where tobacco products may or may not
be smoked. Certain municipalities have enacted local ordinances which preclude the use of electronic cigarettes where traditional
tobacco burning cigarettes cannot be used and certain states have proposed legislation that would categorize electronic cigarettes
as tobacco products, equivalent to their tobacco burning counterparts. If these bills become laws, electronic cigarettes may lose
their appeal as an alternative to cigarettes; which may have the effect of reducing the demand for our products and as a result
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
As
a result of FDA import alert 66-41 (which allows the detention of unapproved drugs promoted in the U.S.), U.S. Customs has from
time to time temporarily and in some instances indefinitely detained products sent by Chinese suppliers. If the FDA modifies the
import alert from its current form which allows U.S. Customs discretion to release our products to us, to a mandatory and definitive
hold we will no longer be able to ensure a supply of saleable product, which will have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations and financial condition. However, we believe this FDA import alert will become less relevant to us as and
when the FDA regulates electronic cigarettes under the Tobacco Control Act.
At
present, neither the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act (which prohibits the use of the U.S. Postal Service to mail most tobacco
products and which amends the Jenkins Act, which would require individuals and businesses that make interstate sales of cigarettes
or smokeless tobacco to comply with state tax laws) nor the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (which governs how
cigarettes can be advertised and marketed) apply to electronic cigarettes. The application of either or both of these federal
laws to electronic cigarettes would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Tobacco
industry expects significant regulatory developments to take place over the next few years, driven principally by the World Health
Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (“FCTC”). The FCTC is the first international public
health treaty on tobacco, and its objective is to establish a global agenda for tobacco regulation with the purpose of reducing
initiation of tobacco use and encouraging cessation. Regulatory initiatives that have been proposed, introduced or enacted include:
|
•
|
the
levying of substantial and increasing tax and duty charges;
|
|
•
|
restrictions
or bans on advertising, marketing and sponsorship;
|
|
•
|
the
display of larger health warnings, graphic health warnings and other labeling requirements;
|
|
•
|
restrictions
on packaging design, including the use of colors and generic packaging;
|
|
•
|
restrictions
or bans on the display of tobacco product packaging at the point of sale, and restrictions or bans on cigarette vending machines;
|
|
•
|
requirements
regarding testing, disclosure and performance standards for tar, nicotine, carbon monoxide and other smoke constituents levels;
|
|
•
|
requirements
regarding testing, disclosure and use of tobacco product ingredients;
|
|
•
|
increased
restrictions on smoking in public and work places and, in some instances, in private places and outdoors;
|
|
•
|
elimination
of duty free allowances for travelers; and
|
|
•
|
encouraging
litigation against tobacco companies.
|
If
electronic cigarettes are subject to one or more significant regulatory initiates enacted under the FCTC, our business, results
of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Number
of total employees and number of full-time employees.
We
currently employ up to 5 full-time staff across all functions of finance, supply chain, legal, sales, marketing, and customer
service, all of whom work in North America. None of our staff are currently covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
We have had no labor-related work stoppages and we believe our relations with our staff are excellent.
Seasonality
of Business
There
is no seasonality in the business or major fluctuations in monthly demand.
Subsidiaries
We
currently do not have any subsidiaries.
Executive
Offices and Registered Agent
We
maintain offices, having an area of approximately 500 square feet, at Tivoli Village, 410 South Rampart, Suite 390, Las Vegas,
NV 89140, which we lease for $400 per month. The lease is on a one year contract with no long-term or other commitments or contracts.
We believe our offices are suitable and adequate to operate our business from at this time as they hold our inventory and provide
us with sufficient space to conduct our operations. We fully utilize our current premises. At the same time, we are
always looking for more efficient solutions and stronger infrastructures to support our operations. We are currently
exploring new integrated inventory, accounting, and operations ERP solutions to enable a stronger platform on which to rapidly
scale the business.
Our
registered transfer agent is Empire Stock Transfer Inc. located at 1859 Whitney Mesa Drive, Henderson, NV 89014. Their
telephone and fax numbers are: Tel: 702-818-5898, Fax: 702-974-1444.
Item
1B. RISK FACTORS
Much
of the information included in this report includes or is based upon estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are statements that relate to future events or future financial performance. In some cases, you
can identify forward-looking statements by the use of terminology such as “may”, “should”, “intend”,
“expect”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “project”,
“predict”, “potential”, or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.
Such forward-looking statements include any projections and estimates made by our management in connection with our business operations.
These statements speak only as of the date of this overview. While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions
upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual
results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future
performance suggested herein.
Such
estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties as outlined below. We caution
the reader that important factors in some cases have affected and, in the future, could materially affect actual results and cause
actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in any such estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements.
The
material assumptions supporting our forward-looking statements include, among other things: (1) our ability to obtain any necessary
financing on acceptable terms; (2) timing and amount of capital expenditures; (3) timely receipt of regulatory and exchange approvals;
(4) our management team’s ability to implement its business plan; (5) consumer’s willingness to switch to electronic
cigarettes; (6) effects of government regulation, including no changes to the regulations, freedom to commercialize our business
or tax structure regarding electronic cigarettes; and (7) general economic and financial market conditions.
Risks
Related to Our Business
If
we do not obtain additional financing, our business plans will be delayed and we may not achieve profitable operations.
We
expect that we will not be able to continue operations without obtaining additional funding or beginning to generate revenue.
Accordingly, we anticipate that funding will be needed for inventory and accounts receivable, general administrative expenses,
business development, marketing costs and support materials.
We
do not currently have any arrangements for financing and our obtaining additional financing will be subject to a number of factors,
including general market conditions, investor acceptance of our plan of operations and initial results from our business operations.
There is no assurance that any additional financing will be available or if available, on terms that will be acceptable to us.
Failure to raise additional financing will cause us to go out of business. If this happens, you could lose all or part of your
investment.
If
our resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain
a credit facility. The sale of additional equity securities could result in additional dilution to our stockholders. The incurrence
of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that
would restrict our operations. We cannot assure you that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us,
if at all.
If
we are unable to successfully develop and market our products or our products do not perform as expected, our business and financial
condition will be adversely affected.
With
the release of any new product, we are subject to the risks generally associated with new product introductions and applications,
including lack of market acceptance, delays in commercial implementation, and failure of products to perform as expected. In order
to introduce and market new or enhanced products successfully with minimal disruption in customer purchasing patterns, we must
manage the transition from existing products in the market. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in developing
and marketing, on a timely basis, product enhancements or products that respond to technological advances by others, that our
new products will adequately address the changing needs of the market or that we will successfully manage product transitions.
Further, failure to generate sufficient cash from operations or financing activities to develop or obtain improved products and
technologies could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We
cannot offer any assurance as to our future financial results. You may lose your entire investment.
Even
if we generate future revenues sufficient to expand operations, increased infrastructure costs and cost of goods sold and marketing
expenses could impair or prevent us from generating profitable returns. We recognize that if we are unable to generate
significant revenues from our business development, we will not be able to earn profits or potentially continue operations. There
is limited history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood that we will continue to be successful, and we may not
be able to generate significant revenues or ever achieve higher levels of profitability. If we are unsuccessful in addressing
these risks, our business will most likely fail.
Electronic
cigarettes may become subject to regulation by the FDA.
The
FDA did not appeal the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in
Sottera, Inc. v. Food & Drug Administration
(2010)
which held that e-cigarettes and other nicotine-containing products are not drugs or devices unless they are marketed
for therapeutic purposes. The Court held further that electronic cigarettes and other nicotine-containing products
can be regulated as “tobacco products” under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Consequently, the FDA may choose to
develop regulations governing the manufacture, marketing and sale of e-cigarettes.
Potential
FDA regulations, or significant costs to comply with potential FDA regulations could have a materially adverse effect on our company’s
operations and profitability. Recent reports suggest that the FDA may issue proposed regulations as early as October 2013. Failure
to comply with FDA regulatory requirements could result in significant financial penalties and could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations and ability to market and sell our products.
On
August 23, 2013, the Wall Street Journal reported that the FDA is considering a ban on online sales of electronic cigarettes,
although the FDA clarified that any such intention would be part of the agency’s rule making procedures. If the FDA implements
such a ban, our financial results would be materially adversely affected, as approximately 50% of our revenue is derived from
online sales.
We
will rely on a third-party for hosting and maintenance of our website. Any mismanagement or service interruptions could
significantly harm our business.
Our
website is hosted and maintained by a third party hosting service. Any mismanagement, service interruptions, or damage
to the data of our company or our customers, could result in the loss of customers, or other harm to our business.
New
product faces intense media attention and public pressure.
Our
product is new to the marketplace and since its introduction certain members of the media, politicians, government regulators
and advocate groups, including independent doctors have called for an outright ban of all electronic cigarettes, pending regulatory
review and a demonstration of safety. A ban of this type would likely have the effect of terminating our United States’
sales and marketing efforts of certain products which we may currently market or have plans to market in the future. Such a ban
would also likely cause public confusion as to which products are the subject of the ban and which are not and would have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and performance.
The
market for our products is uncertain and is still evolving.
Electronic
cigarettes, having recently been introduced to market, are at an early stage of development and are evolving rapidly and are characterized
by an increasing number of market entrants. Our future revenues and any future profits are substantially dependent upon the widespread
acceptance and use of electronic cigarettes. Rapid growth in the use of and interest in, electronic cigarettes is a recent phenomenon,
and may not continue on a lasting basis. The demand and market acceptance for these products is subject to a high level of uncertainty.
We
market a single class of products, which may be subject to certain government regulations, whose approval we may or may not be
able to achieve.
Electronic
cigarettes are new to the marketplace and may be subject to regulation as a drug, a medical device, a drug and medical device
and or as a tobacco product. Most electronic cigarettes are sold as a means of delivering nicotine to the body. The FDA is the
regulatory agency which oversees drugs, medical devices and tobacco; however at present it is unclear which, if any regulatory
process is required to market, and sell electronic cigarettes. To date the FDA has not established a definitive policy regulating
“electronic cigarettes” but is reviewing cases on a case by case basis. We intend to use reasonable efforts to file
for the appropriate approvals to allow us to sell our product in the United States, however we have no indication that at present
we will be able to afford to pursue regulatory approval and that if we are able to pursue said approval we have no assurances
that the outcome of said approval process will result in our products being approved by the FDA. Moreover, if the FDA establishes
a regulatory process that we are unable or unwilling to comply with our business, results of operations, financial condition and
prospects would be adversely affected.
The
anticipated costs of complying with future FDA regulations will be dependent on the rules issued by the FDA. Since
our products are manufactured by third parties, we anticipate that they will bear the initial investment of approval and will
pass those costs to us through price increases. If we need seek FDA approval, then based on several factors including either pre-market
approval or 510K application, we estimate an application could take between 6 to 24 months with a cost of $100,000 to $2 million.
If the device is deemed a drug and a device, we anticipate that the time and costs to comply with FDA regulations would be prohibitive
to the future operations of our company and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition. In addition, failure to comply with FDA regulatory requirements could result in significant financial penalties and
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and ability to market and
sell our products. (See section “Government Regulation.”)
Our
products contain nicotine which is considered to be a highly addictive substance.
Our
products contain nicotine, a chemical found in cigarettes and other tobacco products which is considered to be highly addictive.
The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, empowers the FDA to regulate the amount of nicotine found in tobacco products,
but may not require the reduction of nicotine yields of a tobacco product to zero. Any FDA regulation may require us to reformulate,
recall and or discontinue certain of the products we may sell from time to time, which may have a material adverse effect on our
ability to market our products and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations,
cash flows and/or future prospects.
We
may not successfully commercialize our disposable electronic cigarettes.
We
began marketing our electronic cigarettes in January of 2014. We derive revenues through: distributor sales, selling to wholesalers,
direct to retail distribution and through direct sales to customers over the Internet. Our success depends on our ability to continue
to serve our existing customers and by attracting new customers. Moreover, our ability to expand and commercialize our products
outside of the United States is critical to our business success. Our inability to continue to generate revenues through our sales
channels both in the United States and abroad would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition
and results of operations.
If
our products do not achieve market acceptance, we may not have sufficient financial resources to fund our operations or further
development.
There
can be no assurance that our products will prove to be an attractive alternative to conventional or competitive products in the
markets that we have identified for exploitation. In the event that a viable market for our product cannot be created as envisaged
by our business strategy or our product does not achieve market acceptance, we may need to commit greater resources than are currently
available to develop a commercially viable and competitive product. There can be no assurance that we would have sufficient financial
resources to fund such development or that such development would be successful. In addition, if our product does not generate
sufficient revenues, or we are unable to raise additional capital, we may be unable to fund our operations. Our ability to raise
additional funds will depend on financial, economic and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. There can be no assurance
that, when required, sufficient funds will be available to us on satisfactory terms.
Our
success is dependent upon our marketing efforts.
If
we are unable to generate significant market awareness for our products and our brands our operations may not generate sufficient
revenues for us to execute our business plan, generate revenues and achieve profitable operations.
We
rely, in part, on the efforts of our independent sales distributors and outside broker/dealer network to augment our internal
sales efforts and distribute our product to wholesalers and or retailers to generate revenues. No single distributor currently
accounts for a material percentage of our revenues and we believe that should any of these relationships terminate we would be
able to find suitable replacements, however any change in distributors or our ability to timely replace any given distributor
would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Our
commercial success depends significantly on our ability to develop and commercialize our products without infringing the intellectual
property rights of third parties.
Our
commercial success will depend, in part, on operating our business without infringing the patents or proprietary rights of third
parties. Third parties that believe we are infringing on their rights could bring actions against us claiming damages and seeking
to enjoin the development, marketing and distribution of our products. If we become involved in any litigation, it could consume
a substantial portion of our resources, regardless of the outcome of the litigation. If any of these actions are successful, we
could be required to pay damages and/or to obtain a license to continue to develop or market our products, in which case we may
be required to pay substantial royalties. However, any such license may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Ultimately, we could be prevented from commercializing a product or forced to cease some aspect of our business operations as
a result of patent infringement claims, which would harm our business.
Ruyan,
a Chinese company, has made certain public claims as to their ownership of a Chinese patent relating to an “Atomizing Electronic
Cigarette.” We currently purchase our products from Chinese manufacturers other than Ruyan. Should Ruyan’s patent
be valid and enforceable and cover the devices we purchase from our suppliers, we may be forced to pay more for our products or
we may be cut-off from our supply. Although our current suppliers have validated that our products do not infringe on Ruyan’s
patents, we may nevertheless face a potential action by Ruyan, which we may be forced to defend and which we may ultimately lose.
Should any of these events occur, they are likely to have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business as
a going concern.
R.J.
Reynolds, one of the largest tobacco companies in the world, has filed a patent application for a “Tobacco-Containing Smoking
Article.” If R.J. Reynolds patent is awarded and our products are found to be infringing on their patent, our business,
prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Neither
Ruyan or R.J. Reynolds has contacted us regarding any possible infringement of their intellectual property rights nor has any
party commenced or threatened to commence any legal action against us. If we are required to participate in litigation we may
not have the resources to fund the required litigation costs, which may adversely affect our business prospects, financial condition
and results of operations.
In
the event that patents belonging to Ruyan or R.J. Reynolds or others are enforceable against us, we may be required to obtain
a license to the covered intellectual property or substantially modify or redesign our existing product line in order to continue
operations. We can offer no assurance that a license would be available on acceptable terms or at all, or that we will be able
to revise our business model economically, efficiently or at all.
We
depend on third party suppliers and manufacturers for our electronic cigarette products.
We
do not own or control our supply chain our suppliers or our suppliers’ suppliers, other than Nicotine juice which is purchased
by us in the United States and shipped to our manufacturer for inclusion in our products, therefore we are unable to control or
ensure our supply of products or the consistency of those products. We depend on a third-party supplier and manufacturer for our
electronic cigarette products, which includes, but is not limited to, our electrical components and technology. Our customers
associate certain characteristics of our products including the weight, feel, draw, flavor, packaging and other unique attributes
of our products to the brands we market, distribute and sell. Any interruption in supply and or consistency of our products may
harm our relationships and goodwill with customers/distributors, and have a materially adverse effect on our cash flow and our
operations.
Any
failure to obtain the components, chemicals constituents and manufacturing services necessary for the production of our products
would have a material adverse effect on our business and prevent us from timely execution of our business plan and may result
in additional expenditures of time and money in seeking viable new sources of supply and manufacturer alternatives.
Moreover,
our inability to replicate those certain characteristics of our products, which our customers associate and enjoy, which are unique
to our brands, may cause a loss of customer loyalty, patronage and goodwill and which may have a material adverse effect on our
business.
We
use a Chinese manufacturer for the production of our products.
Our
supplier and product manufacturer is based in China. Should Chinese factories continue to draw public criticism for
exporting unsafe products, whether those products relate to us or not, we may be adversely and materially affected by the stigma
associated with Chinese production, which would affect our business operation, our revenues and our financial projections and
prospects.
Moreover,
products manufactured by our Chinese supplier that are not considered safe and or those products that do not comply with U.S.
safety and health standards may cause significant harm and or death to persons who use the product and subject us to liability
and potential legal claims and cause injury to our reputation, goodwill and operating results.
Product
exchanges, returns, warranty claims, defect and recalls may adversely affect our business.
Any
and all products are subject to customer service claims, malfunctions and defects, which may subject us to requests for product
exchanges, returns, warranty claims and recalls. If we are unable to maintain a certain degree of quality control of our products
we will incur costs of replacing and or recalling our products and servicing our customers. Any product returns, exchanges, and
or recalls we may make will have a material adverse effect on our business, our operations and our profitability and will likely
result in the loss of customers and goodwill.
Moreover
products that do not meet our quality control standards and or those products that do not comply with U.S. safety and health standards
or that may be defective may reduce the effectiveness, enjoyment and or cause harm to property, person and or death to persons
who use the product. Any such instance will likely result in claims against us and potentially subject us to liability and legal
claims which may cause injury to our reputation, goodwill and operating results.
Our
business may be affected if we are taxed like other tobacco products or if we are required to collect and remit sales tax on certain
of our internet sales.
Presently
our products are not taxed like cigarettes or other tobacco products, all of which have faced significant increases in the amount
of taxes collected on the sale of their products. Should state and federal governments and or taxing authorities impose taxes
similar to those levied against cigarettes and tobacco products on our products, it may have a material adverse effect on the
demand for our products. Moreover we may be unable to establish the systems and processes needed to track and submit the taxes
we collect through internet sales, which would limit our ability to market our products through our websites which would have
a material adverse effect on our revenues, operation and financial condition.
States
such as New York, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Georgia and North Carolina have begun collecting taxes on Internet sales where companies
have used independent contractors in those states to solicit sales from residents of those states. The requirement to collect,
track and remit taxes based on independent affiliate sales may require us to increase our prices, which may affect demand for
our products or conversely reduce our net profit margin; either of which would have a material adverse effect on our revenues,
financial condition and operating results.
We
may be unable to promote and maintain our brands.
We
believe that establishing and maintaining brand identities of our products is a critical aspect of attracting and expanding a
large customer/distributor base. Promotion and enhancement of our brands will depend largely on our success in continuing to provide
high quality products. If our customers and end users do not perceive our products to be of high quality, or if we introduce new
products or enter into new business ventures that are not favorably received by our customers/distributors and end users, we will
risk diluting our brand identities and decreasing their attractiveness to existing and potential customers.
Moreover,
in order to attract and retain customers/distributors and to promote and maintain our brand equity in response to competitive
pressures, we may have to increase substantially our financial commitment to creating and maintaining a distinct brand loyalty
among our customers. If we incur significant expenses in an attempt to promote and maintain our brands, our profitability will
likely be impaired.
We
may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which would adversely affect our results of operations.
If
we are successful in growing our business, we will need to significantly expand our operations, which could put significant strain
on our management and our operational and financial resources. To manage future growth, we will need to hire, train, and manage
additional employees. Concurrent with expanding our operational and marketing capabilities, we will also need to increase our
product development activities. We may not be able to support, financially or otherwise, future growth, or hire, train, motivate,
and manage the required personnel. Our failure to manage growth effectively could limit our ability to achieve our goals.
Our
success in managing our growth will depend in part on the ability of our executive officers to continue to implement and improve
our operational, management, information and financial control systems and to expand, train and manage our employee base, and
particularly to attract, expand, train, manage and retain a sales force to market our products on acceptable terms. Our inability
to manage growth effectively could cause our operating costs to grow at a faster pace than we currently anticipate, and could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We
face a risk of product liability claims and may not be able to obtain adequate insurance.
Our
business exposes us to potential liability risks that may arise from the clinical testing, manufacture, and sale of our products.
Substantial damage awards have been issued in certain jurisdictions against pharmaceutical and tobacco companies based on claims
for injuries allegedly caused by the use of pharmaceutical and tobacco products. Liability claims may be expensive to defend and
result in large judgments against us. We currently carry liability insurance, however there is no assurance that it will
continue to be available to us at an affordable price if at all. Our insurance may not reimburse us, or the coverage may not be
sufficient to cover claims made against us. We cannot predict any or all of the possible harms or side effects that may result
from the use of our current products or any future products and, therefore, the amount of insurance coverage we currently hold
may not be adequate to cover all liabilities we might incur. If we are sued for any injury allegedly caused by our products, our
liability could exceed our ability to pay the liability. Whether or not we are ultimately successful in any adverse litigation,
such litigation could consume substantial amounts of our financial and managerial resources, all of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and stock price.
We
face substantial and increasing competition.
We
face intense competition from direct and indirect competitors, including
“big pharma”, “big tobacco”,
and other known and established or yet to be formed electronic cigarette companies, each of whom pose a competitive threat
to our current business and future prospects. We expect competition to intensify in the future. Certain of these companies are
either currently competing with us or are focusing significant resources on providing products that will compete with our disposable
electronic cigarette product offerings in the future.
Our
principal competitors can be classified into three main categories: 1) pharmaceutical companies; 2) tobacco companies; and 3)
other electronic cigarette companies.
Pharmaceutical
companies market smoking cessation aids and alternative nicotine delivery products such as Glaxo SmithKline that market
Nicorette®
stop smoking chewing gum
Nicoderm®
the stop smoking patch and
Zyban
® a sustained release tablet, Pfizer
that markets
Chantix®
and
Nicotrol®
the nicotine inhaler.
Tobacco
companies, including Phillip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, and Lorillard, currently offer traditional tobacco products and may introduce
new tobacco based cigarettes and smoking devices. We also face competition from smaller tobacco companies that are much larger,
better funded, and more established than us.
Electronic
cigarette companies, that currently market competing products, include but are not limited to, Njoy, Blu, Vapor Corps, V2 Cigs,
Victory and others. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against any of the aforementioned competitors,
who may have greater resources, capital, experience, market penetration, sales and distribution channels than us. We have no assurances
that we will be able to compete with these competitors and that we will be successful in operating our business and increasing
profitability. Our inability to successfully compete against these or any of our competitors will have a material adverse effect
our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Litigation
and government regulation will dictate who will be our direct competitors and how we can market our products, if at all.
The
manner in which we are able to sell, market and distribute our products will likely be a result of new and existing U.S. FDA regulations,
and how those regulations affect us will likely be determined by a judgment from the Federal district court for the District of
Columbia and or other appellate courts.
If
a court of competent jurisdiction and or the FDA determines that our product is a smoking cessation device or a nicotine replacement
product and assuming we gain regulatory approval and or otherwise are able and required to market our products as drug products,
we will face intense competition from large pharmaceutical companies with far greater resources, capital, experience, market penetration,
sales and distribution channels than us. We have no assurances that we will be able to compete with these competitors and that
we will be successful in operating our business and increasing profitability.
Restrictions
on the use of our products may reduce the attractiveness and demand for our electronic cigarettes
Since
our product emits no smoke and no smell, it can be used in places where the use of traditional tobacco products, exclusive of
smokeless tobacco is prohibited. Should city, state or federal regulators, municipalities, local governments and private industry
likewise restrict the use of our electronic cigarette products from use in those same places where the use of tobacco products
is prohibited, our customers may reduce or otherwise cease using our products entirely, which would have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and performance.
Liability
for improper marketing, medical claims and labeling
As
a distributor and marketer of a product that the FDA may assert is a smoking cessation device and/or a tobacco product, we face
potential fines, sanctions, administrative actions, penalties, and other liability for: improper labeling, making improper claims,
referencing or publishing to its websites, marketing materials, advertisements, testimonials or representations that certain of
our products have the ability or potential to treat, cure or otherwise improve a medical condition, and or provide a healthier
alternative to other more traditional tobacco products.
Moreover,
if the FDA asserts we are a tobacco product, we may be required to follow federal and state tobacco labeling laws, and could face
potential fines, sanctions, administrative actions, penalties and other liability either civil and or criminal for any violations
thereof.
Any
violation of law with respect to our marketing materials, and or labeling could expose us to liability including but not limited
to fines, sanctions, administrative actions, penalties, civil actions and or criminal prosecution.
Internet
security poses a risk to our E-Commerce sales.
At
present, we generate revenues through the sale of our products through our website. We manage our website and e-commerce platform
internally and as a result any compromise of our security or misappropriation of proprietary information could have a material
adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. We rely on encryption and authentication
technology licensed from other companies to provide the security and authentication necessary to effect secure Internet transmission
of confidential information, such as credit and other proprietary information. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries
in the field of cryptography or other events or developments may result in a compromise or breach of the technology used by us
to protect client transaction data. Anyone who is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information
or cause material interruptions in our operations. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect
against security breaches or to minimize problems caused by security breaches. To the extent that our activities or the activities
of others involve the storage and transmission of proprietary information, security breaches could damage our reputation and expose
us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. For example the storage and loss of credit card numbers that may reside
on our servers and be used directly by us or by our service suppliers (ex. merchant account processors). Our security measures
may not prevent security breaches. Our failure to prevent these security breaches may result in consumer distrust and may result
in a loss of sales and resultantly a loss of revenues.
A
ruling in a federal district court and any subsequent appeals, will dictate what regulations we are required to follow, if any
in marketing certain of our products.
The
FDA has filed an appeal and an administrative stay has been granted in a ruling adverse to the FDA by the U.S District Court for
the District of Columbia titled Smoking Everywhere, Inc. v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et. al. case # 1:2009cv00771; in
which the judge ruled that the United States Food and Drug Administration does not have the authority to seize electronic cigarettes
because these products do not qualify as devices subject to the agency’s regulation. The appellate courts findings may serve
in defining which regulatory processes and regime that electronic cigarette companies will be required to follow in order to bring
these products to market. The courts’ ruling will likely have a significant and material impact on our business model.
The
application of the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act and/or the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act to electronic
cigarettes would have a material adverse effect on our business.
At
present, neither the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act (which prohibits the use of the U.S. Postal Service to mail most tobacco
products and which amends the Jenkins Act, which would require individuals and businesses that make interstate sales of cigarettes
or smokeless tobacco to comply with state tax laws) nor the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (which governs how
cigarettes can be advertised and marketed) apply to electronic cigarettes. The application of either or both of these federal
laws to electronic cigarettes could result in additional expenses, could prohibit us from selling products through the internet
and require us to change our advertising and labeling and method of marketing our products, any of which would have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The
FDA has issued an import alert which has limited our ability to import certain of our products.
As
a result of FDA import alert 66-41 (which allows the detention of unapproved drugs promoted in the U.S.), U.S. Customs has from
time to time temporarily and in some instances indefinitely detained products sent by Chinese suppliers. If the FDA modifies the
import alert from its current form which allows U.S. Customs discretion to release products to us, to a mandatory and definitive
hold we will not be able to ensure a supply of saleable product, which will have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
The
Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act grants the FDA authority to regulate tobacco products and how they are marketed
and sold.
On
June 22, 2009, the
Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act
(the “Act”) was signed into law. The effect
of this legislation on our business is presently unknown and may place limits on our ability to market and or distribute our products
and maintain or bring new products to market. The legislation may impose costly and resource intensive processes to gain regulatory
approval and there is no certainty that we will have the capital, resources necessary to comply with the regulation or that we
would be ultimately successful in receiving the necessary approvals to continue marketing our product in the United States.
Specifically,
the Act grants the FDA the authority to regulate tobacco products including, but not limited to how they are marketed, the level
of nicotine and the method for introducing new tobacco products to market. The legislation eliminates all flavoring other than
menthol, yet under the legislation the FDA is not empowered to ban certain tobacco products or require that the nicotine in tobacco
products be reduced to zero. While the legislation does not mention electronic cigarettes, it does suggest that nicotine and natural
tobacco flavoring are tobacco products under the law and, as such, electronic cigarettes may be covered under this Act.
In
the event a court of competent jurisdiction or the FDA declares certain of our products, namely electronic cigarettes, to be tobacco
products, we would thereafter be required to comply with the Act and the rules promulgated thereunder, in addition to any existing
and future tobacco laws and taxing regimes. The imposition of a tobacco tax on our products would make our products more expensive
and less competitive with products that carry no tax or a lesser tax. Imposing a tax on our products would make our product more
expensive to consumers and could have an adverse effect on the demand for our product and, consequently, our revenues.
If
our product is recognized as a tobacco product, we would become subject to current and future tobacco labeling laws and laws restricting
the sale of our product to persons under 18 years old. While we currently do not market our products to minors, unintentional
violations may subject us to fines and penalties.
Until
the FDA establishes the regulatory processes and regime, as provided for by the Act, we do not know how and to what degree we
will be regulated. Moreover, if the FDA establishes a regulatory process that we are unable or unwilling to comply with our business,
results of operations, financial condition and prospects would be adversely and materially affected. See section “Government
Regulation.”
Because
we do not market our electronic cigarettes for therapeutic purposes, our electronic cigarettes are subject to being classified
as “tobacco products” under the Tobacco Control Act. The Tobacco Control Act grants the FDA broad authority over the
manufacture, sale, marketing and packaging of tobacco products, although the FDA is prohibited from issuing regulations banning
all cigarettes or all smokeless tobacco products, or requiring the reduction of nicotine yields of a tobacco product to zero.
Among other measures, the Tobacco Control Act (under various deadlines):
|
•
|
increases
the number of health warnings required on cigarette and smokeless tobacco products, increases the size of warnings on packaging
and in advertising, requires the FDA to develop graphic warnings for cigarette packages, and grants the FDA authority to require
new warnings;
|
|
•
|
requires
practically all tobacco product advertising to eliminate color and imagery and instead consist solely of black text on white
background;
|
|
•
|
imposes
new restrictions on the sale and distribution of tobacco products, including significant new restrictions on tobacco product
advertising and promotion as well as the use of brand and trade names;
|
|
•
|
bans
the use of “light,” “mild,” “low” or similar descriptors on tobacco products;
|
|
•
|
gives
the FDA the authority to impose tobacco product standards that are appropriate for the protection of the public health (by,
for example, requiring reduction or elimination of the use of particular constituents or components, requiring product testing,
or addressing other aspects of tobacco product construction, constituents, properties or labeling);
|
|
•
|
requires
manufacturers to obtain FDA review and authorization for the marketing of certain new or modified tobacco products;
|
|
•
|
requires
pre-market approval by the FDA for tobacco products represented (through labels, labeling, advertising, or other means) as
presenting a lower risk of harm or tobacco-related disease;
|
|
•
|
requires
manufacturers to report ingredients and harmful constituents and requires the FDA to disclose certain constituent information
to the public;
|
|
•
|
mandates
that manufacturers test and report on ingredients and constituents identified by the FDA as requiring such testing to protect
the public health, and allows the FDA to require the disclosure of testing results to the public;
|
|
•
|
requires
manufacturers to submit to the FDA certain information regarding the health, toxicological, behavioral or physiologic effects
of tobacco products;
|
|
•
|
prohibits
use of tobacco containing a pesticide chemical residue at a level greater than allowed under federal law;
|
|
•
|
requires
the FDA to establish “good manufacturing practices” to be followed at tobacco manufacturing facilities;
|
|
•
|
requires
tobacco product manufacturers (and certain other entities) to register with the FDA; and
|
|
•
|
grants
the FDA the regulatory authority to impose broad additional restrictions.
|
The Tobacco Control Act
also requires establishment, within the FDA’s new Center for Tobacco Products, of a Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory
Committee to provide advice, information and recommendations with respect to the safety, dependence or health issues related to
tobacco products.
As
indicated above, the Tobacco Control Act imposes significant new restrictions on the advertising and promotion of tobacco products.
For example, the law requires the FDA to finalize certain portions of regulations previously adopted by the FDA in 1996 (which
were struck down by the Supreme Court in 2000 as beyond the FDA’s authority). As written, these regulations would significantly
limit the ability of manufacturers, distributors and retailers to advertise and promote tobacco products, by, for example, restricting
the use of color, graphics and sound effects in advertising, limiting the use of outdoor advertising, restricting the sale and
distribution of non-tobacco items and services, gifts, and sponsorship of events and imposing restrictions on the use for cigarette
or smokeless tobacco products of trade or brand names that are used for non-tobacco products. The law also requires the FDA to
issue future regulations regarding the promotion and marketing of tobacco products sold or distributed over the internet, by mail
order or through other non-face-to-face transactions in order to prevent the sale of tobacco products to minors.
It
is likely that the Tobacco Control Act could result in a decrease in tobacco product sales in the United States, including sales
of our electronic cigarettes.
While
the FDA has not yet mandated electronic cigarettes be regulated as tobacco products, during 2012, the FDA indicated that it intends
to regulate electronic cigarettes under the Tobacco Control Act through the issuance of deeming regulations that would include
electronic cigarettes under the definition of a “tobacco product” under the Tobacco Control Act subject to the FDA’s
jurisdiction. The FDA has announced that it will issue proposed deeming regulations by April 2013. As of the date of this report,
the FDA had not taken such action.
The
application of the Tobacco Control Act to electronic cigarettes could impose, among other things, restrictions on the content
of nicotine in electronic cigarettes, the advertising, marketing and sale of electronic cigarettes, the use of certain flavorings
and the introduction of new products. We cannot predict the scope of such regulations or the impact they may have on our company
specifically or the electronic cigarette industry generally, though if enacted, they could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition. In this regard, total compliance and related costs are not possible to
predict and depend substantially on the future requirements imposed by the FDA under the Tobacco Control Act. Costs, however,
could be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, failure to comply with the Tobacco Control Act and with FDA regulatory requirements could result in significant financial
penalties and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and ability
to market and sell our products. At present, we are not able to predict whether the Tobacco Control Act will impact us to a greater
degree than competitors in the industry, thus affecting our competitive position.
The
FDA regulates how products are marketed and used.
The
FDA regulates claims to diagnose, mitigate, prevent, treat or cure a disease. And the FDA in Smoking Everywhere v. FDA contends
that the
Intended Use of
electronic cigarettes is sufficient for the FDA to assert jurisdiction. If claims made at large
by our competitors and third parties, arise to the level to subject us to FDA regulation we may determine it is necessary to change
our business model and product to differentiate our product(s) and brand(s) so as not to be confused with those companies who
improperly market their products. If we are found to have improperly sold or marketed our products in violation of FDA rules,
laws or policies, we may be subject to disciplinary, regulatory or administrative actions, fines and or sanctions which may have
a material adverse effect on our operations, financial results and business prospects.
The
FDA regulates drugs and medical devices and if our products are considered either or both we may be subject to regulation and
may in fact have violated federal law in our previous sales and marketing efforts.
We
are engaged in marketing and selling efforts of disposable electronic cigarettes. We may have unknowingly and without intent failed
to comply with certain regulations relating to our product and the means by which we market and sell our products. Our efforts
may have been in violation of existing laws which may subject us to enforcement actions, sanctions, fines, administrative action
or other penalties, all which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, performance and results of operations.
If
we have improperly marketed and distributed certain of our products in violation of FDA Regulations we may be subject to disciplinary,
actions, administrative actions, sanctions and fines.
We
may be subject to disciplinary, administrative and or regulatory actions if the FDA and or a court of proper jurisdiction determine
that our products or the means by which we marketed and sold our products was affected without the proper regulatory approvals.
Any such disciplinary, regulatory or administrative actions, fines and/or sanctions may have a material adverse effect on our
operations, financial results and business prospects.
Changes
in governmental regulation may affect the countries in which we sell our products.
Foreign
jurisdictions have varying policies and laws with respect to the use of electronic cigarettes that vaporize nicotine. Countries
such as the United Kingdom do not restrict its use, while other countries, such as Thailand, have instituted a total ban. If countries
such as the United Kingdom reverse their stance or should other countries who have a neutral stance move towards prohibition,
it will have a direct impact on our ability to market our products and will have a material adverse effect on our business.
Actions
by the FDA adverse to our company and our products may restrict our ability to do business domestically and internationally.
The
FDA is the largest and most pervasive health regulator in the world. Should we be unable to comply with FDA regulations or should
the FDA refuse registration of our products and or should the FDA ban or prohibit the sale and/or marketing of our products, other
regulators from different countries may assume the same position with respect to our product, causing us substantial harm and
raise questions with respect to our ability to continue to operate our business in its current form or at all.
If
our third-party suppliers or contract manufacturers do not maintain appropriate standards of manufacturing in accordance with
GMP and other manufacturing regulations, our development and commercialization activities could suffer significant interruptions
or delays.
We
rely, and intend to continue to rely, on third-party suppliers and contract manufacturers to provide us with our products. These
suppliers and manufacturers must continuously adhere to GMP as well as any applicable corresponding manufacturing regulations
outside of the U.S. In complying with these regulations, we and our third-party suppliers and contract manufacturers must expend
significant time, money and effort in the areas of design and development, testing, production, record-keeping and quality control
to assure that our products meet applicable specifications and other regulatory requirements. Failure to comply with these requirements
could result in an enforcement action against us, including warning letters, the seizure of products, suspension or withdrawal
of approvals, shutting down of production and criminal prosecution. Any of these third-party suppliers or contract manufacturers
will also be subject to audits by the FDA and other regulatory agencies. If any of our third-party suppliers or contract manufacturers
fail to comply with GMP or other applicable manufacturing regulations, our ability to develop and commercialize our products could
suffer significant interruptions and delays.
We
have related party loans.
We
have financed a portion of our operations from capital which has been raised from advances from related parties. Such loans and
advances from related parties total $91,964 as of December 31, 2013. These loans are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on
demand. If we do not have adequate resources to pay back these loans and advances when demanded, we may have to obtain alternative
financings or default on these loans.
Risks
Related to our Common Stock
Penny
stock rules will limit the ability of our stockholders to sell their stock.
The
Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any equity security
that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain
exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers
who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor”
refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or
annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to
a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form
prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks
in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny
stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the
market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and
salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and
must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules
require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special
written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written
agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the
secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the
ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit
the marketability of our common stock.
We
may seek to raise additional funds, finance acquisitions or develop strategic relationships by issuing capital stock that would
dilute your ownership.
We
expect to continue to finance our operations, acquisitions and develop strategic relationships, by issuing equity securities,
which could significantly reduce the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders. Furthermore, any newly issued securities
could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our existing stock. Moreover, any issuances by us of equity securities
may be at or below the prevailing market price of our common stock and in any event may have a dilutive impact on your ownership
interest, which could cause the market price of stock to decline. We may also raise additional funds through the incurrence of
debt or the issuance or sale of other securities or instruments senior to our shares of common stock. The holders of any debt
securities or instruments we may issue would have rights superior to the rights of our common stockholders.
We
do not anticipate paying cash dividends for the foreseeable future, and therefore investors should not buy our stock if they wish
to receive cash dividends.
We
have never declared or paid any cash dividends or distributions on our common stock. We currently intend to retain any future
earnings to support operations and to finance expansion and, therefore, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our
common stock in the foreseeable future.
Because
our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and Nevada law limit the liability of our officers, directors, and others, shareholders
may have no recourse for acts performed in good faith.
Our
Articles of Incorporation contain specific provisions that eliminate the liability of directors for monetary damages to us and
our stockholders; further, we are prepared to give such indemnification to our existing and future directors and officers to the
extent provided by Nevada law. We may also have contractual indemnification obligations under any employment agreements we may
have with our officers and directors. The foregoing indemnification obligations could result in our incurring substantial expenditures
to cover the cost of settlement or damage awards against directors and officers, which we may be unable to recoup. These provisions
and resultant costs may also discourage us from bringing a lawsuit against existing and future directors and officers for breaches
of their fiduciary duties and may similarly discourage the filing of derivative litigation by our stockholders against our existing
and future directors and officers even though such actions, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our stockholders.
The
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, has adopted sales practice requirements which may also limit a shareholder’s
ability to buy and sell our stock.
In
addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an
investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that
customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make
reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other
information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced
securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend
that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on
the market for its shares.
Our
Board of Directors is authorized to issue additional shares of our stock which would dilute existing shareholders.
We
are currently authorized to authorize up to 500,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 99,000,000 shares are currently issued
and outstanding. Additional shares of our common stock may be issued by our board of directors for such consideration as they
may consider sufficient without seeking stockholder approval. The issuance of additional shares of common stock in the future
will reduce the proportionate ownership and voting power of current stockholders.