Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
For
the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Note
1 – Nature of the Business
Rightscorp,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on April 9, 2010, and
its fiscal year end is December 31. The Company is the parent company of Rightscorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation formed on January
20, 2011 (“Rightscorp Delaware”). On October 25, 2013, the Company acquired Rightscorp Delaware in a transaction treated
as a reverse acquisition, and the business of Rightscorp Delaware became the business of the Company.
The
Company has developed products and intellectual property rights relating to providing data and analytics regarding copyright infringement
on the Internet. The Company is dedicated to the vision that digital creative works should be protected economically so that the
next generation of great music, movies, video games and software can be made and their creators can prosper. The Company has a
patent-pending, proprietary method for gathering and analyzing infringement data and for solving copyright infringement by collecting
payments from illegal downloaders via notifications sent to their ISP’s.
Note
2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Going
Concern
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which
contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As
reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred
a net loss of $1,355,747, and used cash in operations of $807,530, and at December 31, 2016, the Company had a stockholders’
deficit of $2,092,060. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern
within one year after the date that financial statements are issued. The Company’s financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
At
December 31, 2016, the Company had cash of $5,047. Management believes that the Company will need at least another $500,000 to
$1,000,000 in 2017 to fund operations based on our current operating plans. Management’s plans to continue as a going concern
include raising additional capital through borrowings and/or the sale of common stock. No assurance can be given that any future
financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company
is able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt financing, or
cause substantial dilution for our stock holders, in case of an equity financing.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
financial statements include the accounts of Rightscorp Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary Rightscorp Delaware. Intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Significant
estimates include accounting for potential liabilities, and the assumptions made in valuing share-based instruments issued for
services, and derivative liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all cash, certificates of deposit and other highly-liquid investments with original maturities of three months
or less, when purchased, to be cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015 the Company had no cash equivalents.
Property
and equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives of three
years. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred while renewals and betterments are capitalized.
Gains and losses on disposals are included in the consolidated statements of operations.
Management
assesses the carrying value of property and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value
may not be recoverable. If there is indication of impairment, management prepares an estimate of future cash flows expected to
result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If these cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset,
an impairment loss is recognized to write down the asset to its estimated fair value. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and
2015, the Company did not recognize any impairments for its property and equipment.
Revenues
Copyright
settlement revenue
The
Company provides a service to copyright owners under which copyright owners retain the Company to identify and collect settlement
payments from Internet users who have infringed on their copyrights. Revenue is recognized when the Company collects a fee from
an infringer which acts as a settlement of the infringement liability. Generally, the Company has agreed to remit 50% of such
collections to the copyright holder. The Company also provides services to copyright holders. Service fee revenue is recognized
when the service has been provided.
Consulting
revenue
Revenue
is recognized in the period services are rendered and earned under service arrangements with clients where service fees are fixed
or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.
Dependence
on Major Customers
For
the year ended December 31, 2015, our contract with BMG Rights Management accounted for approximately 76% of our sales, and our
contract with Warner Bros. Entertainment accounted for 13% of our sales. For the year ended December 31, 2016, our contract with
Recording Industry Association of America accounted for approximately 44% of our sales, and our contract with BMG Rights Management
accounted for 23% of our sales. Our standard contracts with customers are for initial terms which vary in length, typically between
three months and one year, and renewals are at the discretion of the parties, or in some cases renew automatically in one month
increments, subject to the right of either party to terminate upon 30 days’ notice.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible
temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are
the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by
a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred
tax assets will be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates
on the date of enactment.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company periodically grants stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions as compensation
for services rendered. The Company accounts for stock option and stock warrant grants to employees based on the authoritative
guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board where the value of the award is measured on the date of grant and
recognized over the vesting period. The Company accounts for stock option and stock warrant grants to non-employees in accordance
with the authoritative guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board where the value of the stock compensation is determined
based upon the measurement date at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which
the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges generally
are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance
requirements by the non-employee, option or warrant grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge
is recorded in the period of the measurement date.
The
fair value of the Company’s common stock option and warrant grants is estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model,
which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the common stock options,
and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes option pricing model,
and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model could materially affect compensation
expense recorded in future periods.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The
Company evaluates its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify
as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument
is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported
in the statements of operations. The Company uses a probability weighted average Black-Scholes-Merton model to value the derivative
instruments. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities
or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance
sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within
12 months of the balance sheet date.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Under
current accounting guidance, fair value is defined as the price at which an asset could be exchanged or a liability transferred
in a transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability.
Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where
observable prices or parameters are not available, valuation models are applied. A fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs
used in measuring fair value into three broad levels as follows:
Level
1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level
2 – Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, are observable either directly or indirectly.
Level
3 – Unobservable inputs based on the Company’s assumptions.
The
Company is required to use observable market data if such data is available without undue cost and effort. As of December 31,
2016, the amounts reported for cash, accrued liabilities and accrued interest approximated fair value because of their short-term
maturities.
Derivative
liabilities of $280,316 and $1,210,430 were valued using Level 2 inputs as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Basic
and diluted loss per share
Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of outstanding
common shares during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss applicable to common stockholders
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding
if all dilutive potential common shares had been issued. Potential common shares are excluded from the computation when their
effect is anti-dilutive.
At
December 31, 2016 and 2015, the dilutive impact of outstanding stock options for 900,000 and 970,000 shares, respectively, and
outstanding warrants for 46,958,072 and 35,310,140 shares, respectively, have been excluded because their impact on the loss per
share is anti-dilutive.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts
with Customers. ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition
guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. Under ASU
2014-09, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services and is recognized in an amount that
reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard
requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
The FASB has recently issued ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-11, ASU 2016-12, and ASU 2016-20 all of which clarify certain
implementation guidance within ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15,
2017. Early adoption is permitted only in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods
therein. The standard can be adopted either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method),
or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application
(the cumulative catch-up transition method). The Company is currently in the process of analyzing the information necessary to
determine the impact of adopting this new guidance on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The Company
will adopt the provisions of this statement in the first quarter of fiscal 2018. NOTE: Add a description of the method the registrant
expects to use (i.e. full retrospective or modified retrospective) if determined.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to record a right of use asset and a corresponding
lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for all interim
and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective transition
approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest
period presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the expected impact that the standard could
have on its financial statements and related disclosures.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued the ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting. The amendments in this ASU require, among other things, that all income tax effects of awards be recognized
in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. The ASU also allows for an employer to repurchase more of an employee’s
shares than it can today for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting and allows for a policy election
to account for forfeitures as they occur. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual
period. The Company is currently evaluating the expected impact that the standard could have on its financial statements and related
disclosure
Other
recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact
on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial statements.
Note
3 – Fixed Assets
As
of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, fixed assets consisted of the following:
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Computer equipment and fixtures
|
|
$
|
312,756
|
|
|
$
|
312,756
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(258,643
|
)
|
|
|
(170,236
|
)
|
Fixed assets, net
|
|
$
|
54,113
|
|
|
$
|
142,520
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $88,407 and $114,652, respectively.
Note
4 – Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
As
of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, accounts payable and accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
862,860
|
|
|
$
|
683,488
|
|
Due to copyright holders
|
|
|
601,421
|
|
|
|
414,688
|
|
Accrued settlement
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Accrued payroll
|
|
|
180,894
|
|
|
|
62,908
|
|
Insurance premium financing payable
|
|
|
40,802
|
|
|
|
46,780
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,885,977
|
|
|
$
|
1,407,864
|
|
In
November 2014, the Company was named as defendant in a class action complaint (see
John Blaha v. Rightscorp, Inc
in Note
10). In August 2015 the Company reached a preliminary settlement in the matter and at December 31, 2015 and 2016, has accrued
a settlement of $200,000 related to this, which is net of expected insurance proceeds of $250,000. The $200,000 settlement was
paid on January 7, 2017, and the insurance company paid $250,000 on January 7, 2017 (see Note 11).
Note
5 - Notes Payable
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, a third-party shareholder loaned the Company $50,000 for working capital purposes. The $50,000
is due on demand, unsecured, and interest is at 4% per year. In addition, the note holder received warrants to purchase
500,000 shares of common stock. The warrants are exercisable at $0.02 per share, have a term of three years, and were 100% vested
upon issuance. As a result, the Company recorded a note discount of $16,691 to account for the relative fair value of the warrants.
As the note payable is due on demand, the note discount was expensed immediately.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued additional warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock to the note
holder. The warrants are exercisable at $0.02 per share, have a term of one year, and were 100% vested upon issuance. The Company
determined that the fair value of the warrants was $13,363 which was expensed immediately.
Note
6 – Derivative Liabilities
In
September 2014, the Company issued warrants exercisable into 17,892,000 shares of common stock in relation to the sale of 11,928,000
shares of its common stock. The warrants had a term of five years and an exercise price of $0.25 per share, subject to adjustment,
as defined, if the Company issues securities at a price lower than the exercise price of these warrants in the future (see Note
7). At December 31, 2015, 15,792,000 of these warrants were outstanding. During the year ended December 31, 2016, 6,580,000 of
these warrants were exercised, and at December 31, 2016, 9,212,000 of these warrants were outstanding.
Pursuant
to FASB authoritative guidance on determining whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own
stock, instruments, which do not have fixed settlement provisions, are deemed to be derivative instruments. The exercise price
of the warrants issued in September 2014 did not have fixed settlement provisions because their exercise prices could be lowered
if the Company issues securities at lower prices in the future. In accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, the Company
determined that the exercise feature of the warrants was not considered to be indexed to the Company’s own stock, and bifurcated
the exercise feature of the warrants and recorded a derivative liability. The derivative liability is re-measured at the end of
every reporting period with the change in fair value reported in the statement of operations.
At
December 31, 2015, the fair value of the derivative liabilities was $1,210,430. During the year ended December 31, 2016, 6,580,000
warrants accounted for as derivative liabilities were exercised and as such their corresponding fair value at the exercise date
of $302,754 was extinguished from the derivative liabilities balance. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the fair value
of the derivative liabilities decreased by $627,360, and at December 31, 2016, the fair value of the derivative liabilities was
$280,316.
At
December 31, 2016 and 2015, the fair value of the derivative liabilities were determined through use of a probability-weighted
Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model based on the following assumptions:
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
172
|
%
|
|
|
274
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected life
|
|
|
2.7 years
|
|
|
|
4.5 years
|
|
To
estimate the expected volatility, the Company used historical volatility calculated using daily closing prices for its common
stock over periods that match the expected term of the warrants. The risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by
the Federal Reserve Bank. The expected life of the exercise feature of the warrants was based on the remaining term of the warrants.
The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has not customarily paid dividends in the past and does not
expect to pay dividends in the future.
Note
7 – Common Stock
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company sold units to accredited investors for an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of its
common stock at $0.05 per share and warrants to purchase 10,000,000 shares of its common stock for total gross proceeds of $500,000.
The warrants have a term of three years and an exercise price of $0.10 per share.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 6,956,218 shares of its common stock upon the exercise of 6,680,000 warrants
issued in connection with the sale of common stock in 2014, and the exercise of 276,218 warrants issued for services in 2012 and
2013. The total proceeds from the exercise of the warrants was $69,563.
During
the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company entered into securities purchase agreements with 11 accredited investors pursuant
to which the Company sold an aggregate of 10,320,000 shares of common stock for $0.10 per share and warrants to purchase 10,320,000
shares of common stock for total proceeds of $1,032,000. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.15 per share and have a term
of three years.
During
the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 6,450,000 shares of its common stock with a fair value of $759,560 to employees
and consultants for services rendered. The shares were valued at market prices, which ranged from $0.09 per share to $0.15 per
share, on the date the shares were granted.
Note
8 – Stock Options and Warrants
Options
During
the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company granted options to purchase 970,000 shares of common stock with exercise prices
ranging from $0.15 to $0.25 per share to employees of the Company. The stock options generally vest between two and three years.
The fair value of these options was determined to be $194,201 using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model based on the
following assumptions: (i) volatility rate ranging from 180% to 207%, (ii) discount rate ranging from 1.5% to 1.71%, (iii) zero
expected dividend yield, and (iv) expected life of 5 to 10 years.
During
the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded compensation costs of $38,614 and $84,589, respectively, relating
to the vesting of stock options. As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate value of unvested options was $3,303, which will be amortized
through June, 2017.
The
stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows:
|
|
Number of Options
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
|
|
Balance outstanding, January 1, 2015
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
9.64
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
970,000
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
5.99
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited/expired
|
|
|
(360,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
8.88
|
|
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2015
|
|
|
970,000
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
6.71
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited/expired
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2016
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2016
|
|
|
106,664
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
At
December 31, 2016, the Company’s outstanding and exercisable options had no intrinsic value. On January 4, 2017, 750,000
of the options outstanding at December 31, 2016 were cancelled.
Warrants
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued warrants exercisable into 19,000,000 shares of common stock. Warrants exercisable
into 10,000,000 shares of common stock were issued with 10,000,000 shares of common stock (see Note 7) and warrants exercisable
into 1,000,000 shares of common stock were issued to a note holder (see Note 5).
In
addition, the Company issued warrants for services to purchase 8,000,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $0.15 per share,
with a term of three years, and 100% vested upon issuance. The Company determined that the award is a certainty and the service
performance and its future benefit were not assured, and so the fair value of the 8,000,000 warrants calculated to be $330,210
was expensed immediately.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded compensation costs of $75,022 relating to the vesting of other stock warrants.
During
the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company granted warrants to purchase 4,850,000 shares of common stock with exercise prices
ranging from $0.15 to $0.25 per share to employees of the Company and consultants. In September 2015, in conjunction with the
issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock to accredited investors, the Company issued warrants exercisable into 10,320,000
shares of common stock. The warrants have a term of three years and an exercise price of $0.15 per share. During the year ended
December 31, 2015, the Company recorded compensation costs of $349,110 relating to the vesting of other stock warrants
For
the years ending December 31, 2016 and 2015, the fair value of warrant awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing
model with the following assumptions:
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
121
|
%
|
|
|
134% to 144
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.08
|
%
|
|
|
1.2% to 1.5
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected life
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
3 to 5 years
|
|
To
estimate the expected volatility, the Company used historical volatility calculated using daily closing prices for its common
stock over periods that match the expected term of the warrants. The risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by
the Federal Reserve Bank. The expected life of the exercise feature of the warrants was based on the remaining term of the warrants.
The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has not customarily paid dividends in the past and does not
expect to pay dividends in the future.
As
of December 31, 2016, the aggregate value of unvested warrants was $10,191, which will be amortized through June, 2017.
A
summary of the Company’s warrant activity during the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 is presented below:
|
|
Number of Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term
|
|
Balance outstanding, January 1, 2015
|
|
|
22,450,140
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
15,170,000
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
3.07
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(600,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited/expired
|
|
|
(1,710,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2015
|
|
|
35,310,140
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
19,000,000
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(6,956,218
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
2,65
|
|
Forfeited/expired
|
|
|
(395,850
|
)
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance outstanding, December 31, 2016
|
|
|
46,958,072
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2016
|
|
|
46,458,072
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
4,25
|
|
At
December 31, 2016, the Company’s outstanding and exercisable warrants had an intrinsic value of $225,897.
Note
9 - Income Taxes
Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets
as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are summarized below.
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
$
|
3,837,00
|
|
|
$
|
3,300,000
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
216,000
|
|
|
|
417,000
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
4,053,000
|
|
|
|
3,717,000
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(4,053,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,717,000
|
)
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
In
assessing the potential realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon
the Company attaining future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. As of December
31, 2016 and 2015, management was unable to determine if it is more likely than not that the Company’s deferred tax assets
will be realized, and has therefore recorded an appropriate valuation allowance against deferred tax assets at such dates.
No
federal tax provision has been provided for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 due to the losses incurred during such
periods. Reconciled below is the difference between the income tax rate computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate and
the effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
U.S federal statutory income tax
|
|
|
(34.00
|
)%
|
|
|
(34.00
|
)%
|
State tax, net of federal tax benefit
|
|
|
(5.80
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.80
|
)%
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
At
December 31, 2016, the Company has available net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of approximately
$8.8 million and $8.3 million, respectively, which, if not utilized earlier, expire through 2036.
Note
10 – Commitments & Contingencies
Legal
proceeding
John
Blaha v. Rightscorp, Inc
, C.D. Cal. (Original Complaint Filed November 21, 2014; First Amended Complaint Filed March 9, 2015).
Nature
of Matter: This matter seeks relief for alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. § 227). The
action is brought on behalf of the individual named plaintiff as well as on behalf of a putative nationwide classes.
Progress
of Matter to Date: This matter was previously captioned with Karen J. Reif and Isaac Nesmith as lead plaintiffs. On March 9, 2015,
plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint replacing the lead plaintiffs, dropping their second and third causes of action for
Violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq.) and Violations of the Rosenthal Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act (Cal. Civ. Code § 1788 et seq.) (and dropping associated putative class claims), and naming BMG
Rights Management (US) LLC and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. as additional defendants.
The
First Amended Complaint also contained a cause of action for Abuse of Process. In response to the Abuse of Process claim, defendants
brought a special motion to strike the claim under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. Defendants’ anti-SLAPP motion
was granted on May 8, 2015. Pursuant to the Court’s May 8, 2015 Order, the Abuse of Process claim (and associated putative
class claim) was stricken from the case and plaintiff was ordered to pay defendants’ attorney’s fees incurred in bringing
the anti-SLAPP motion.
Following
the dismissal of Plaintiff’s Abuse of Process claim, the parties agreed to mediate the dispute and reached a settlement
in principal. On June 24, 2016, the Court issued an order granting plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of class
action settlement. On August 1, 2016, notice was sent to the class. A hearing regarding final approval of the settlement was
held November 14, 2016 and the settlement was approved. The Company has recorded a reserve for the estimated settlement
of $200,000 related to this, which is net of expected insurance proceeds of $250,000.
WINDSTREAM
SERVICES, LLC Plaintiff V. BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT (US) LLC, et al. Defendant, S.D. NY. (Original Complaint Filed June 27, 2016).
Nature
of Matter:
This matter is a Civil action seeking declaratory relief under 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq. and 28 U.S.C.
§§ 2201, et seq. Rightscorp was named as an additional Defendant in this matter. Plaintiff is seeking declaratory relief
that it is not liable for the copyright infringements of its customers.
Progress
of Matter to Date:
Company waived service of process on July 6, 2016. A pre-trial conference has yet to be scheduled. The
Company believes the case is without merit. This matter has been settled.
Note
11 – Subsequent Event
On
January 7, 2017, BMG Rights Management (US) LLC advanced us $200,000, which was used to pay off the settlement (see
John Blaha
v. Rightscorp, Inc
in Note 10).
On
March 18, 2017, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Cecil Kyte, the Company’s chief executive officer.
Upon execution of the employment agreement, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock, and 10-year options to purchase
5,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.05, 1,000,000 of which will vest immediately, and the remaining 4,000,000
of which will vest monthly in 48 equal monthly installments (each of 83,333 options) commencing on February 14, 2018.