Item 2.01
|
Completion of Acquisition or Disposition
of Assets.
|
OVERVIEW
As
used in this report, unless otherwise indicated, the terms “we” and “us” refer to China Teletech Holding
Inc., a Florida corporation (“China Teletech”), its wholly-owned subsidiary Strategic Services Group Ltd., a British
Virgin Islands company (“SSGL”), 51%-owned subsidiary Liaoning Kunchengyuan Internet Technology Co. Ltd. (formerly
known as Liaoning Kuncheng Education Investment Co. Ltd.) (“Kuncheng”), and 51%-owned subsidiary Liaoning Kunyuan
Internet Technology Co. Ltd (“Kunyuan”). As of the date of this report, each of Kuncheng and Kunyuan is a foreign
investment limited liability entity (“FIE”) organized pursuant to PRC laws.
As
of the date of this report, 51% of Kuncheng is held by China Teletech, 43.9% held by Mr. Yang, and the remaining 5.1% held by
Zefeng Sun. As of the date of this Report, China Teletech is a 51% owner of Kunyuan upon closing of the Kuncheng Share Exchange,
and Kuncheng a 49% holder.
HISTORY
We
were incorporated as Avalon Development Enterprises, Inc. on March 29, 1999, under the laws of the State of Florida. From
inception until January 2007, we engaged in the business of acquiring commercial property which later expanded to include building
cleaning, maintenance services, and equipment leasing as supporting ancillary services and sources of revenue. On January
10, 2007, the Company, Global Telecom Holdings, Ltd., a British Virgin Islands company (“GTHL”), and the shareholders
of GTHL, entered into a share exchange agreement, pursuant to which the Company issued 39,817,500 restricted shares of its common
stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) to the shareholders of GTHL in exchange for all of the issued
and outstanding capital stock of GTHL. Following the transaction on March 27, 2007, GTHL became our wholly-owned
subsidiary and we changed our name to Guangzhou Global Telecom Holdings, Inc. and succeeded to the business of GTHL.
In
2007, we established four subsidiaries; namely, Zhengzhou Global Telecom Equipment Limited (“ZGTE”), Macau Global Telecom
Company Limited (“MGT”), Huantong Telecom Hongkong Holding Limited (“HTHKH”), and Huantong Telecom Singapore
Company PTE Limited (“HTS”) with capital of RMB 500,000, Macau Dollar 300,000, Hong Kong Dollar 100 and Singapore Dollar
200,000, respectively. Simultaneously, we established a subsidiary; namely, Guangzhou Huantong Telecom Technology and Consultant
Services, Ltd (“GHTTCS”) with capital of RMB 8,155,730. Pursuant to stock purchase agreements dated April 9, 2008 and
July 29, 2008 (the “Stock Purchase Agreements”), respectively, the Company acquired 50% of the issued and outstanding
shares of Beijing Lihe Jiahua Technology and Trading Company Ltd (“BLJ”) and 51% of the issued and outstanding shares
of Guangzhou Renwoxing Telecom Co., Ltd. (“GRT”), a limited liability company incorporated in China from the respective
shareholders of BLJ and GRT (the “Shareholders”). Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreements, the Shareholders
agreed to sell and transfer the proportion of the shares to the Company for a purchase consideration of US$300,000 and US$291,833
respectively.
In
2009 and 2010, the Company disposed of CHTTCS, ZGTE, MGT and BLJ due to their loss in operations. HTHKH and HTS were not able
to commence operations since its inception, so the Company deregistered them in 2010.
Acquisition
of China Teletech Limited
On
March 30, 2012, the Company completed a share exchange transaction with China Teletech Limited, a British Virgin Islands corporation
(“CTL”), by entering into a share exchange agreement dated March 30, 2012 with CTL and the former shareholders of CTL.
CTL
is a British Virgin Islands Company, incorporated on January 30, 2008 under the British Virgin Islands Business Act 2004.
Its primary business operations were concluded through two wholly owned subsidiaries located in China, namely, (a) Shenzhen
Rongxin Investment Co., Ltd. (“Shenzhen Rongxin”) and (b) Guangzhou Rongxin Science and Technology Limited
(“Guangzhou Rongxin”).
Pursuant
to the share exchange agreement dated March 30, 2012, we acquired all the outstanding capital stock of CTL from the former shareholders
of CTL in exchange for the issuance of 40,000,000 shares of our Common Stock. The shares issued to the former shareholders of
CTL constituted approximately 68.34% of our issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock immediately upon the commutation of
the share exchange transaction. As a result of the share exchange, CTL became our wholly owned subsidiary and Dong Liu and Yuan
Zhao, the former shareholders of CTL, became our principal shareholders.
In
connection with the share exchange, Yankuan Li resigned as our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Chairman of the Board of
Directors, effective as of March 30, 2012. At the same time, Dong Liu, Yuan Zhao, Yau Kwong Lee and Kwok Ming Wai Andrew were
appointed as our directors. Ms. Yankuan Li remained President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company.
Sale
of the Company’s Wholly-Owned Subsidiary, Guangzhou Global Telecommunication Company Limited
On
June 30, 2012, we entered into a sales and purchase agreement with Mr. Zhu Sui Hui (“Mr. Hui”) pursuant to which we
sold all the capital stock of Guangzhou Global Telecommunication Company Limited (“GGT”), our wholly-owned subsidiary,
to Mr. Hui for RMB 5,000, or approximately $800 (the “GGT Spin-Off”). Both parties agreed to unconditionally waive
the current accounts payable or receivable balances between the Company (and its subsidiaries) and GGT. Before the GGT Spin-Off,
GGT was engaged in the trading and distribution of cellular phones and accessories, prepaid calling cards, and rechargeable store-value
cards.
Disposition
of the Company’s variable interest entity, Shenzhen Rongxin Investment Co., Ltd.
On
September 30, 2012, CTL entered into an agreement with a related party of us, Liu Yong, brother of Mr. Liu Dong, the Company’s
former Chairman, to dispose of the variable interest entity Shenzhen Rongxin Investment Co., Ltd for a cash consideration of US$1,579.
Sale
of the Company’s Subsidiary, GRT
On
June 30, 2013, the Company’s subsidiary, GTHL, entered into an agreement with an independent third party to spin off its
51% owned subsidiary GRT for a cash consideration of US$3,232.
Deregistration
of the Company’s Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries, Guangzhou Rongxin Science and Technology Limited
On
December 30, 2013, the Company had its subsidiary, Guangzhou Rongxin deregistered due to ceased operations.
Following
the deregistration of Guangzhou Rongxin, the Company became a shell company with no operations until the Company entered into
the Jinke Share Exchange Agreement (defined below) with Jinke (defined below).
Sale
of the Company’s Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries Global Telecom Holdings Limited and China Teletech Limited
On
January 1, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with an independent third party to dispose of GTHL and CTL for a cash consideration
of US$2,000.
Share
Exchange with Jinke
On
January 28, 2015, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Jinke Share Exchange Agreement”) with
Shenzhen Jinke Energy Development Co., Ltd., a company organized under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“Jinke”),
and Guangyuan Liu, the holder of 97% of the equity interest of Jinke (the “Mr. Liu”), pursuant to which the Company
acquired 51% of the issued and outstanding equity securities of Jinke (the “Jinke Share Exchange”). In connection
with the Jinke Share Exchange, Mr. Guangyuan Liu was appointed a director of the Company.
Pursuant
to the Jinke Share Exchange Agreement, the Company agreed to issue an aggregate of 20,000,000 shares of its Common Stock to Mr.
Liu in exchange for 51% of the issued and outstanding securities of Jinke. Of the 20,000,000 shares to be issued by the Company,
16,000,000 were issued on October 6, 2014 (“Jinke Issued Shares”) and delivered to Mr. Liu and his designee prior
to closing and 4,000,000 were to be issued and delivered at closing. The Jinke Share Exchange closed on January 28, 2015. The
remaining 4,000,000 shares were never issued to Mr. Liu.
Incorporation
of Strategic Services Group Limited
On
November 8, 2016, SSGL was incorporated in the British Virgin Islands as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. SSGL is an
investment holding company with no business operation since its incorporation.
Rescission
Agreement with Jinke
On
November 15, 2016, the Company, Jinke and the Jinke Shareholder entered into a certain mutual rescission agreement (the “Rescission
Agreement”), whereby the parties agreed to rescind the Jinke Exchange Agreement and unwind the Jinke Share Exchange as if
it had never occurred, for a consideration of 10,000,000 newly issued restricted shares (the “Rescission Shares”)
of the Common Stock to be issued to Mr. Liu upon closing of the transactions contemplated in the Rescission Agreement. Pursuant
to the Rescission Agreement, Mr. Liu would return and surrender the Jinke Issued Shares and the Company would issue the Rescission
Shares to Mr. Liu. Mr. Liu also resigned as a director pursuant to the Rescission Agreement, effective as of November 15, 2016.
As of the date of this Report, Mr. Liu has not returned and surrendered the Jinke Issued Shares and the Company has not issued
the Rescission Shares.
Kuncheng
Share Exchange Agreement with Kuncheng
On
November 15, 2016, the Company, Kuncheng and Mr. Yang, the principal shareholder of Kuncheng, entered into the Kuncheng Share
Exchange Agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to purchase 51% of the equity ownership in Kuncheng, for a purchase price
of an aggregate of 30,000,000 shares of Common Stock issued to Mr. Yang (the “Kuncheng Share Exchange”).
In
connection with the Kuncheng Share Exchange, Kuncheng shall appoint additional members to the Board of Directors of the Company
(the “Board”) including Mr. Yang, upon Closing (defined below). As of the date of this report, Mr. Yang was appointed
a director of the Board.
As
of the date of this report, the Company and Mr. Yang completed the closing of the Kuncheng Share Exchange and the Company has
completed the registration of the transfer of Kuncheng’s ownership with the relevant PRC governmental authorities (the “Closing”).
10,000,000 additional shares were issued and delivered upon closing of the Kuncheng Share Exchange, and the remaining 20,000,000
shares were issued at the Closing.
Registration
of Kunyuan
On
April 19, 2017, Liaoning Kunyuan Internet Technology Co. Ltd. (“Kunyuan”) was registered under the laws of the People’s
Republic of China as a JV. Effective June 2, 2017, Kunyuan changed its registration to become an FIE. As of the date of this report,
Kuncheng holds 49% and China Teletech holds 51% of the ownership in Kunyuan. As of the date of this report, Kunyuan has no significant
business activities or operations.
The
corporate structure of China Teletech subsequent to the closing of the Kunyuan Share Exchange is illustrated as follows:
The
address of our principal executive offices and corporate offices is Liwan District, No.145 Enzhou Big Lane, B2 Fuli Square, 8th
Zhongshan Road, Unit 505, 5/F, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. Our telephone number is 00852-6873-3117.
PRINCIPAL
TERMS OF THE KUNCHENG SHARE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT
On
November 15, 2016, China Teletech, Kuncheng and Mr. Yang entered into the Kuncheng Share Exchange Agreement pursuant to which
China Teletech agreed to issue an aggregate of 30,000,000 shares of its Common Stock, to Mr. Yang in exchange for 51% of the issued
and outstanding securities of Kuncheng. Prior to the Kuncheng Share Exchange, Mr. Yang was a 94.9% shareholder of Kuncheng. At
the closing of the Kuncheng Share Exchange, Mr. Yang is now a 43.9% shareholder of Kuncheng.
Both
China Teletech and Kuncheng believed that the acquisition transaction is in the best interest of their respective shareholders.
China Teletech believed that the acquisition would enhance the value of the Company through the acquisition of a majority equity
interest in Kuncheng’s viable business, and Kuncheng believed that such transaction would afford Kuncheng access to the
U.S. capital market and other possible financial resources. Prior to the execution of the Kuncheng Share Exchange Agreement, no
material relationship had existed between China Teletech and its affiliates, on the one hand, and Kuncheng and its affiliates,
on the other.
10,000,000
shares of Common Stock were issued and delivered on January 3, 2017, prior to the closing of the Kuncheng Share Exchange. The
Kuncheng Share Exchange closed on the date of this Report, and the remaining 20,000,000 shares of Common Stock were issued to
Mr. Yang. Because the Company is a non-PRC shareholder of Kuncheng, it must take steps to register its foreign ownership.
As of May 26, 2017, Kuncheng has obtained approval from the relevant PRC governmental authorities including but not limited to,
(1) changing the registration of ownership of Kuncheng to reflect the transfer of the 51% equity interest to China Teletech, and
(2) changing Kuncheng’s registration from a PRC entity to an FIE.
In
connection with the Kuncheng Share Exchange, Mr. Yang was appointed a director of the Board, effective as of the closing of the
Kuncheng Share Exchange.
BUSINESS
Prior
to entering into the Kuncheng Share Exchange with Kuncheng and Mr. Yang, we were a shell company with no operations. As of the
date of this report which is the closing of the transactions underlying the Kuncheng Acquisition, we are a holding company with
substantially all of our operations located in the PRC through our 51% equity ownership of Kuncheng. Through Kuncheng, we are
now an education service company that provides education investment, education management and operation of education institutions,
and international education programs.
Established
in March 30, 2016, Kuncheng is a limited liability company primarily focused on investing in education programs and operating
and managing education institutions.
Kuncheng
entered into a certain Project Transfer Agreement on April 20, 2016 (the “Project Transfer Agreement”) with
Shenyang Aidesi Education School, d/b/a Shenyang International A-Level Center (the “Center”) to acquire the right
of operating and managing the Center for a consideration of RMB 3,485,250 (approximately US$ 535,000). The Center is a
private, non-corporation entity registered/organized under the laws of the People’s Republic of China, and was
established in May 2011. The consideration was fully paid by Kuncheng, to Gu Wei and Yang Weida, who control the Center and
are referred to as “sponsors” of the Center according to PRC laws and regulations. The Center has a registered
capital of RMB 500,000, of which 30% was previously paid in by Gu Wei, and 70% by Yang Weida. Kuncheng is not a
“sponsor” to the Center. Following the Project Transfer Agreement, Gu Wei and Yang Weida continue to be the
Center’s sponsors and no change of ownership or control of the Center is registered with the competent PRC government
bureaus and/or agencies. After acquiring the right to manage and operate the Center, Kuncheng’s main operation
currently is focused on operating and managing the Center, and the revenue mainly comes from the tuition and boarding income
of the Center’s International A-level program and the tutoring program. The Center does not currently have a valid
private school operating permit and its permit has expired since March 2016. The Center is in the process of obtaining a
valid private school operating permit from the relevant local education bureau. We are operating the Center and may also be
subject to relevant penalties. For risks related to operating the Center without a valid private school operating permit, see
detailed discussion in the Risk Factors - Risks Related To Our Business - The private school operating permit of the Center
that we operate and manage, is currently expired and we may be deemed operating a school illegally and may be subject
to administrative penalties.
Following
the transfer of the right to operate and manage the Center’s programs (“Project Transfer”), Kuncheng has been
operating the Center’s International A-level program and the tutoring program. Teachers employed by the Center prior to
the Project Transfer by Kuncheng are now employed by Kuncheng.
Our
Program
Currently,
our primary programs are International A-Level preparation program, and English tutoring program. Students who are accepted into
our International A-Level Exam preparation program and later have completed our International A-Level Exam preparation courses
plan to take the A-level Testing administered by Edexcel. Students who are not accepted into our International A-Level Exam preparation
program will have the opportunity to take part in our tutoring program until we deem them ready to begin our International A-Level
Exam preparation courses.
Our
teachers are primarily licensed teachers, with either an English language undergraduate degree, a relevant degree to the subject
matter they are teaching, or a teaching undergraduate degree. We employ both A-level course teachers and language tutors.
A-level
and International A-level
The
A Level (Advanced Level) is a subject-based qualification conferred as part of the General Certificate of Education, as well as
a school leaving qualification offered by the educational bodies in the United Kingdom and the educational authorities of British
Crown dependencies to students completing secondary or pre-university education. Obtaining A Level or equivalent qualifications
is generally required for university entrance.
International
A-level testing is similar to that offered by the educational bodies in the United Kingdom and the educational authorities of
British Crown dependencies, but instead are offered outside of the UK and British Crown dependencies and mainly administered globally
by Cambridge International Examiners and Edexcel. International A-level testing is recognized for university entrance.
Students
can take A-level courses at any age. They mainly involve studying the theory of a subject combined with some investigative work,
and are usually studied full-time over two years.
Edexcel
International A-level Testing
Edexcel,
now known as Pearson - London Examinations, is a multinational education and examination body owned by Pearson. Pearson Edexcel,
the only privately owned examination board in the UK, is part of Pearson PLC, and regulates school examinations under the British
Curriculum and offers qualifications for schools on the international and regional scale. Edexcel is the UK’s largest awarding
organization offering academic and vocational qualifications in schools, colleges and work places in the UK and abroad, and also
recognized internationally. Edexcel International A-level qualifications are only available outside of the UK, the Channel Islands
and the Isle of Man.
Edexcel
offers a variety of academic qualifications including GCSEs and A levels, as well as some vocational qualifications, including
NVQs and Functional Skills. Edexcel A Level is one of the most respected qualifications in the world leading to university study.
It is the most widely studied qualification by UK students aged 16-18 and the most referenced qualification by top-ranked UK institutions
for progression onto university education and accepted by the world’s leading research universities. Edexcel A Level is recognized
by many universities including the top 100 universities in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings universities,
such as Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), California Institute of Technology (Caltech), John Hopkins University and
the University of Toronto. Available in over 40 subjects, Edexcel A-level curriculum give students the chance to develop intellectually
as they explore the different subjects. Our Center uses preparation materials and teacher support of Edexcel A-level and our students
take the qualification tests at Edescel International A-level testing centers.
Shenyang
University Cooperation Agreement
Effective
November 30, 2016, the Foreign Language Education Center of Shenyang University, a comprehensive university first established
in 1906, and Liaoning Boqiao Study Abroad Co. Ltd. (“Boqiao”) entered into a certain Cooperation Agreement with Boqiao
to establish and co-operate the Center (the “University Cooperation Agreement”). Boqiao is an affiliated party of
Gu Wei, the Center’s sponsor, of whom Boqiao and the Center are under common control. Pursuant to the University Cooperation
Agreement, the Foreign Language Education Center of Shenyang University provides the classrooms for the Center, for an annual
fee.
We
currently operate out of the Foreign Language School of Shenyang University, where we sublease our office and ten classrooms from
Boqiao. For detailed information regarding the sublease, refer to Business – Properties below.
A-Level
Preparation Courses
We
provide test preparation courses for Edexcel International A-level testing to Chinese students who aspire to study in overseas
and international universities via the Center. Our International A-level program was designed to specifically address the needs
of these students in terms of both language and academics. The preparation courses we offer are basic mathematics, economics,
biology, accounting, art and design, chemistry, physics and others. Currently our Center is located in Shenyang, the capital of
Liaoning Province, and we mainly serve the three provinces in Northeast China, Heilongjiang, Liaoning, and Jilin.
To
qualify for enrollment in our A-level Program, students are tested in three subjects, English, Mathematics, Science and are required
to attend an interview conducted in English. Qualified students may immediately enroll in our A-level Program on a full-time basis.
Those who do not qualified can elect to take tutoring classes until they qualify for our A-level program. Full-time students do
not enroll in other high school diploma programs or PRC high schools. We do not offer PRC high school diplomas or any high school
diploma equivalents to students in our A-level Program.
Annual
tuition for full-time students enrolled in our A-level program is currently RMB 92,000, and subject to future changes. Students
with outstanding performance in the enrollment qualification may receive a RMB 20,000 scholarship. The Center also provides boarding
to students with such needs.
As
of the date of this report, there are approximately 25 students enrolled in our A-level program for the school year of 2016-2017.
The number of students have enrolled in our A-level program has increased steadily in the
last six school years, 8 in 2011, 11 in 2012, 15 in 2013, 18 in 2014, and 22 in 2015.
Of
those students who have completed their A-level preparation courses, taken the tests, and applied for universities abroad, 32
students have received offers from UK universities, 16 from US universities, 18 from Canadian universities, and 35 from Australian
universities.
We
recommend our application preparation business partners to our students in the A-level program with applying to universities abroad,
and do not provide application preparation services to our students.
Tutoring
We
also provide English language tutoring and subject tutoring to students who do not immediately qualify for enrollment in our A-level
program, and preparation for IELTS, TOEFL and English testing taking courses. Upon successfully completing English language tutoring
and/or subject tutoring, a student will be qualified to enroll in our A-level preparation courses. Currently, approximately 10
students are enrolled in our tutoring program.
Marketing
We
selectively employ a variety of marketing methods to enhance the brand recognition of our programs. Currently, most of our student
enrollments came from word-of-mouth and recruitment from our business partners who specialize in searching for and placing students
who wish to study abroad for their higher education degrees. We plan to continue to take measures to increase word-of-mouth referrals
which have been key to bringing in new students and building our brand. In addition, we also advertise in print and broadcast
media, social media such as wechat.
Industry
China’s
Private Education Market
Driven
by rapid economic growth, urbanization and higher per capita disposable income of urban households, China has experienced significant
growth in the private education market. According to the Frost & Sullivan Report, China’s private education market reached
RMB 1,057.7 billion (US$163.3 billion) in 2015, and is expected to further grow at a CAGR of 15.4% to RMB 2,161.8 billion
(US$333.7 billion) in 2020.
China’s
A-Level Education Market
The
Chinese Ministry of Education reports that 523,700 Chinese students went abroad to study in 2015, representing a 13.9% increase
over 2014 levels but marks the second consecutive year – after 11.1% growth in 2014 – of growth levels below the 19.1%
average annual growth over the past four decades. The percentage of students heading abroad for an undergraduate degree has also
been increasing in recent years. In 2016, the percentage of Chinese students heading abroad for an undergraduate degree is 27.7%,
according to Qide Education.
More
and more Chinese students are considering pursuing an undergraduate degree abroad in recent years. Consequently, the students’
demand for preparation courses with respect to entrance to undergraduate programs abroad has rapidly and steadily increased. There
are a number of international testing courses for entrance to undergraduate programs globally, with A-level, International Baccalaureate,
and Advanced Placement being the three major ones. The number of schools that offer A-level courses, increasing at a consistent
double digit rate in the last few years, and so have testing centers. As of September 2016, China has 318 registered A Level testing
centers, including 169 testing centers authorized by Cambridge International Examiners and 149 testing centers authorized by Edexcel
of Pearson. A Level is currently the most popular international courses for Chinese students, since the schools in China that
offer A-Level, IB or AP, about half of these schools offer A Level courses.
In
2016, the total number of students from mainland China who enrolled in the Cambridge A-Level related courses (including AS, A-Level,
and IGCSE) is 71, 651, which is a 15% increase over 2015, far exceeding the global growth rate of 10%. Out of the 71,651 students,
approximately 31,000 students took Cambridge A-Level courses, which is an 11% increase over 2015.
China’s
English Education Market
There
are more opportunities for people in China to use English in their daily lives and significant and increasing demand among the
Chinese population for improving their general English proficiency, owing to continued globalization, improvements in the standard
of living and increasing demand from Chinese consumers for overseas services and products. According to the Frost & Sullivan
Report, as of December 31, 2015, the population of K-12 students, college students and working adults in China reached
180.2 million, 26.3 million and 774.5 million, respectively, and the frequency of overseas travelling of residents
in China reached 133.6 million times during 2015. All of these groups have potentially significant demand for English education.
However, primarily due to the exam-driven curriculum design, China’s compulsory education system is unable to adequately enhance
individuals’ English proficiency and address the large potential English education demand.
According
to the Report, people value quality of teachers, lesson format and brand reputation as the top considerations when selecting English
education providers. In particular, the majority of the participants prefer small group or one-on-one lesson over large group
lesson formats for English education.
China’s
English education market in terms of gross billings grew from RMB79.5 billion (US$12.3 billion) in 2010 to RMB153.4 billion
(US$23.7 billion) in 2015, representing a CAGR of 14.0%, and is expected to further increase to RMB445.8 billion (US$68.8 billion)
in 2020, representing a CAGR of 23.8% from 2015.
Competition
The
private education especially foreign testing preparation sector in China is rapidly evolving, highly fragmented and competitive,
and we expect competition in this sector to persist and intensify. We face intense competition in the A-level and English language
programs we offer and the geographic market in which we operate. For example, we face regional competition for our A Level Training
Program from several local competitors such as Dalian Lingying International School, Shenyang Foreign Language School, and Shenyang
Peinuo Education, that focus on offering A-Levels courses to high school aged students in Northeastern region, including several
local international schools.
We
do not currently offer classes online but the increasing use of the internet and advances in internet- and computer-related technologies,
such as web video conferencing and online testing simulators, are eliminating geographic and cost-entry barriers to providing
private educational services. As a result, many of our international competitors that offer online test preparation and training
courses may be able to more effectively penetrate the China market. Many of these international competitors have strong education
brands, and students and parents in China may be attracted to the offerings of our international competitors based in the country
that the student wishes to study in or in which the selected language is widely spoken. In addition, many smaller companies are
able to use the Internet to quickly and cost-effectively offer their programs, services and products to a large number of students
with less capital expenditure than previously required.
Growth
Strategy
In
addition to organic growth via enhanced student experience and maintaining our high reaching standard while enrolling more students,
we intend to focus on expanding our operation by strategic acquisition of schools such as PRC high schools. Our goals are:
|
1.
|
Acquire up to four
schools from 2017-2018, in Liaoning, Jilin and Helongjian;
|
|
2.
|
Acquire up to 6
schools from 2019-2020, in Liaoning, Jilin and Helongjian
|
|
3.
|
Acquire up to 9
schools in 2021-2022, in in Liaoning, Jilin and Helongjian and certain regions in Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanxi and Inner
Mongolia.
|
Intellectual
Property
The
Center’s Chinese name is 爱得思, which is the Chinese name used by Pearson’s Edexcel in the PRC
market. The Center had chosen when the Center registered in 2011, and before Pearson acquired Edexcel. After Pearson acquired
Edexcel, Pearson had approached the Center to suggest it change its legal entity name, but has not taken any legal actions as
of the date of this report. The management believes that the risk of Pearson bringing a trademark infringement case against the
Center is de minimus. Additionally, the Center is in the process of changing its registered corporate name.
Seasonality
Our
industry is typically
affected by seasonality, primarily due to the period of the delivery
of education services in each school year. Each school year is comprised of two semesters. The first semester starts in the third
quarter and the second semester starts in the first quarter.
We have experienced higher gross revenue growth in the third
quarter of the calendar year since our inception in March 2016, but due to our limited operating history, the seasonal trends
that we have experienced in the past may not be indicative of our future operating results. Our financial condition and results
of operations for future periods may continue to fluctuate. As a result, the trading price of our common stock may fluctuate from
time to time due to seasonality.
PRC
Government Regulations
We
require a number of approvals, licenses and certificates in order to operate our business. Our principal approvals, licenses and
certificates are set forth below.
The
Center is required to have a private education institution license for offering non-degree education to students. The Center’s
private education permit expired in March 2016, and the Center are in the process of obtaining the private school operating permit.
As of the date of this report, the relevant local education bureau, Shenyang Education Bureau has not issued any warning, administrative
penalty or other measures against the Center. For risks related to operating the Center without a valid private school operating
permit, see detailed discussion in the Risk Factors - Risks Related To Our Business - The private school operating permit of the
Center we operate and manage, is currently expired and we may be deemed operating a school illegally and may be subject to administrative
penalties.
Regulations
on Private Education
The
principal laws and regulations governing private education in China consist of the
Education Law of the PRC
, the
Law
for Promoting Private Education (2003)
and the
Implementation Rules for the Law for Promoting Private Education
(2004)
, and the
Regulations on Chinese-Foreign Cooperation in Operating Schools
. Below is a summary of the relevant
provisions of these regulations.
Education
Law of the PRC
On
March 18, 1995, the National People’s Congress enacted the
Education Law of the PRC
. The Education Law
sets forth provisions relating to the fundamental education system of the PRC, including a system of preschool, primary, secondary
(including middle and high schools) and higher education and a system of awarding certificates or diplomas. The
Education
Law
stipulates that the government formulates plans for the development of education, and establishes and operates schools
and other institutions of education. Under the
Education Law
, enterprises, social organizations and individuals are
encouraged to operate schools and other types of educational organizations in accordance with PRC laws and regulations. Meanwhile,
no organization or individual may establish or operate a school or any other institution of education for profit-making purposes.
However, private schools may be operated for “reasonable returns,” as described in more detail below.
The
Law for Promoting Private Education (2003) and the Implementation Rules for the Law for Promoting Private Education (2004)
The
Law
for Promoting Private Education (2003)
became effective on September 1, 2003. The
Implementation Rules for
the Law for Promoting Private Education (2004)
became effective on April 1, 2004. Under these regulations, “private
schools” are defined as schools established by non-governmental organizations or individuals using non-government funds.
According
to PRC laws and regulations, entities and individuals who establish private schools are commonly referred to as “sponsors”
instead of “owners” or “shareholders.” The economic substance of “sponsorship” with respect
of private schools is substantially similar to that of ownership with regard to legal, regulatory and tax matters. The main differences
between sponsorship and equity ownership can be found in the specific provisions of the laws and regulations applicable to sponsors
and owners, as follows:
|
●
|
Right
to receive a return on investment. Either sponsors or owners shall have the right to receive a return on investment. However,
the portion of after-tax profits that can be distributed by a company to its owner is different from that distributed by a
school to its sponsor. Under the PRC
Company Law
, a company is required to allocate 10% of its after-tax profits
to statutory reserve funds, while under the
Law for Promoting Private Education
and the
Implementation
Rules for the Law for
Promoting Private Education
, a school that requires reasonable returns is required to
allocate no less than 25% of its annual net profit or annual increased net assets to its development fund as well as make
allocation for mandatory expenses as required by applicable laws and regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Right
to the distribution of residual properties upon termination and liquidation. Under the PRC
Company Law
, properties
that remain upon termination and liquidation of a company after payment of relevant fees and compensations are to be distributed
to its owners. With respect to a school, the
Law for Promoting Private Education
provides that
such distribution be made in accordance with other relevant laws and regulations. However, since there have been no other
relevant laws and regulations addressing the distribution of residual properties upon termination and liquidation of a private
school, such distribution shall be made to the sponsors after payment of relevant fees and compensations since the sponsors
bear the investment benefits and risks.
|
Despite
the above differences between sponsorship and ownership, the sponsor of a private school has effective control over such private
school under the
Law for Promoting Private Education
through controlling the executive council or board of directors
of such school, which is the decision-making body of the school. Through the school’s decision-making body, the sponsor
exercises a broad range of powers, including (i) the appointment and dismissal of the school principal, (ii) the amendment
of articles of association of the school and formulation of rules and regulations of the school, (iii) the adoption of development
plans and approval of annual work plans, (iv) raising funds for school operations and adoption of budgets and final accounts,
(v) making decisions on the size and compensation of the staff, (vi) making decisions on the division, merger or termination
of the school, and (vii) making decisions on other important matters of the school. In addition, through controlling the decision-making body,
the sponsor also has the power to use and manage the properties of the school in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.
In
addition, under the
Law for Promoting Private Education (2003)
, private schools providing certifications or diplomas,
pre-school education, other culture education (including K-12 education) and self-study aids are subject to approval by the education
authorities, while private schools engaging in occupational training are subject to approval by the authorities in charge of labor
and social welfare.
A
duly approved private school will be granted a private school operating permit, and shall be registered with the Ministry of Civil
Affairs or its local bureaus as a privately run non-enterprise institution. In addition, schools and their learning centers must
make filings with the MOE and the Ministry of Civil Affairs or their local bureaus.
Under
the above regulations, private schools have the same status as public schools, though private schools are prohibited from providing
military, police, political and other kinds of education that are of a special nature. Government-run schools that provide compulsory
education are not permitted to be converted into private schools. In addition, operation of a private school is highly regulated.
For example, the items and amounts of fees charged by a private school providing certifications or diplomas shall be approved
by the governmental pricing authority and be publicly disclosed.
Private
schools are divided into three categories: private schools established with donated funds; private schools that require reasonable
returns and private schools that do not require reasonable returns. While private education is treated as a public welfare undertaking
under the regulations, in the case of private schools choosing to require “reasonable returns,” sponsors of these
schools may choose to require “reasonable returns” from the annual net balance of the school after deduction of costs,
donations received, government subsidies, if any, the reserved development fund and other expenses required by the regulations.
The
election to establish a private school requiring reasonable returns shall be provided in the articles of association of the school.
The percentage of the school’s annual net balance that can be distributed as a reasonable return shall be determined by
the school’s board of directors, taking into consideration the following factors: (i) items and criteria for the school’s
fees, (ii) the ratio of the school’s expenses used for educational activities and improving the educational conditions
to the total fees collected; and (iii) the admission standards and educational quality. Such information and the decision
to distribute reasonable returns is also required to be filed with the approval authorities within 15 days from the decision made
by the board. However, none of the current PRC laws and regulations provides a formula or guidelines for determining “reasonable
returns.” In addition, none of the current PRC laws and regulations sets forth different requirements or restrictions on
a private school’s ability to operate its education business based on such school’s status as a school that requires
reasonable returns or a school that does not require reasonable returns.
At
the end of each fiscal year, every private school is required to allocate a certain amount to its development fund for the construction
or maintenance of the schools or procurement or upgrade of educational equipment. In the case of a private school that requires
reasonable returns, this amount shall be no less than 25% of the annual net income of the school, while in the case of a private
school that does not require reasonable returns, this amount shall be not less than 25% of the annual increase in the net assets
of the school, if any. Under the Implementation Rules for the Law for Promoting Private Education in 2004, or the 2004 Implementing
Rules, private schools, whether requiring reasonable returns or not, may enjoy preferential tax treatment. The 2004 Implementing
Rules provide that the relevant authorities under the State Council may introduce preferential tax treatments and related policies
applicable to private schools requiring reasonable returns. To date, however, no separate policies, regulations or rules have
been introduced by the authorities in this regard.
As
of the date of this report, the Center’s private school operating permit has expired in March 2016 and the Center is in
the process of obtaining its private school operating permit with the local bureau of education as required by PRC regulations.
Kuncheng has the right to operate and manage the Center, including directly receiving the revenue generated by tuition and board
fees, but does not and will not be the sponsor of the Center.
Regulations
on Chinese-foreign cooperation in operating schools
Chinese-foreign
cooperation in operating schools or training programs is specifically governed by the Regulations on Operating Chinese-foreign
Schools, promulgated by the State Council in 2003 and the Implementing Rules for the Regulations on Operating Chinese-foreign
Schools, or the Implementing Rules, which were issued by the MOE in 2004.
The
regulations on Operating Chinese-foreign Schools and its Implementing Rules encourage substantive cooperation between overseas
educational organizations with relevant qualifications and experience in providing high-quality education and Chinese educational
organizations to jointly operate various types of schools in the PRC, with such cooperation in the areas of higher education and
occupational education being encouraged. Chinese-foreign cooperative schools are not permitted, however, to engage in compulsory
education and military, police, political and other kinds of education that are of a special nature in the PRC.
Permits
for Chinese-foreign Cooperation in Operating Schools can be obtained from education authorities or from the authorities that regulate
labor and social welfare in the PRC.
Foreign
investment in educational service industry
Under
the
Foreign Investment Industries Guidance Catalog (2015)
, or Foreign Investment Catalog, which was amended and promulgated
by the National Development and Reform Commission, or NDRC, and the MOFCOM in March 2015 and became effective on April 10, 2015,
foreign investment is encouraged in non-academic vocational training institutions. Preschool education, senior high school education
and higher education in grades 10 to 12 are in a restricted industry, meaning foreign educational organizations with relevant
qualifications and experience and Chinese educational organizations are only allow to operate senior high schools in cooperative
ways in the PRC. Any foreign investment in higher education and senior high school education has to take the form of a cooperative
joint venture. Foreign investment is banned from compulsory education, which means grades 1 to 9. Foreign investment is allowed
in after-school tutoring services and training services which do not grant certificates or diplomas.
Employment
Laws
We
are subject to laws and regulations governing our relationship with our employees, including: wage and hour requirements, working
and safety conditions, and social insurance, housing funds and other welfare. These include local labor laws and regulations,
which may require substantial resources for compliance.
China’s
National Labor Law, which became effective on January 1, 1995, and China’s National Labor Contract Law, which became effective
on January 1, 2008, permit workers in both state and private enterprises in China to bargain collectively. The National Labor
Law and the National Labor Contract Law provide for collective contracts to be developed through collaboration between the labor
union (or worker representatives in the absence of a union) and management that specify such matters as working conditions, wage
scales, and hours of work. The laws also permit workers and employers in all types of enterprises to sign individual contracts,
which are to be drawn up in accordance with the collective contract. The National Labor Contract Law has enhanced rights
for the nation’s workers, including permitting open-ended labor contracts and severance payments. The legislation requires
employers to provide written contracts to their workers, restricts the use of temporary labor and makes it harder for employers
to lay off employees. It also requires that employees with fixed-term contracts be entitled to an indefinite-term contract
after a fixed-term contract is renewed once or the employee has worked for the employer for a consecutive ten-year period.
We
are required by PRC laws and regulations to pay various statutory employee benefits, including pensions, housing funds, medical
insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated governmental agencies for
the benefit of our employees. Except for housing funds, we are in compliance with payment of all other employment related insurance
on behalf of our employees.
Tax
Pursuant
to the Provisional Regulation of China on Value Added Tax and their implementing rules, all entities and individuals that are
engaged in the sale of goods, the provision of repairs and replacement services and the importation of goods in China are generally
required to pay VAT at a rate of 17.0% of the gross sales proceeds received, less any deductible VAT already paid or borne by
the taxpayer. Further, when exporting goods, the exporter is entitled to a portion of or all the refund of VAT that it has already
paid or borne.
The
Center has deregistered its Taxpayer Identification Number with Shenyang Huanggu District effective as of September 2016, after
which Kuncheng has been remitting taxes for the operation of our A-level program.
Foreign
Currency Exchange
The
principal regulations governing foreign currency exchange in China are the Foreign Exchange Administration Regulations promulgated
by the State Council, as amended on August 5, 2008, or the Foreign Exchange Regulations. Under the Foreign Exchange Regulations,
the Renminbi is freely convertible for current account items, including the distribution of dividends, interest payments, trade
and service-related foreign exchange transactions. Conversion of Renminbi for capital account items, such as direct investments,
loans, repatriation of investments and investments in securities outside of China, however, is still subject to the approval of
the PRC State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE. Foreign-invested enterprises may only buy, sell and/or remit foreign
currencies at those banks authorized to conduct foreign exchange business after providing valid commercial documents and, in the
case of capital account item transactions, obtaining approval from the SAFE. Capital investments by foreign-invested enterprises
outside of China are also subject to limitations, which include approvals by the Ministry of Commerce, the SAFE and the State
Reform and Development Commission.
Dividend
Distributions
Under
applicable PRC regulations, enterprises in China may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in
accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, enterprises in China is required to set aside at least
10.0% of its after-tax profit based on PRC accounting standards each year as its statutory general reserves until the accumulative
amount of such reserves reach 50.0% of its registered capital. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. The board
of directors of enterprise has the discretion to allocate a portion of its after-tax profits to staff welfare and bonus funds,
which may not be distributed to equity owners except in the event of liquidation.
Kuncheng
has never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain any future earnings for use in the operation
and expansion of our business. Consequently, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock to our stockholders
for the foreseeable future.
Properties
Our
corporate office is located at Liwan District, No.145 Enzhou Big Lane, B2 Fuli Square, 8th Zhongshan Road, Unit 505, 5/F, Guangzhou,
Guangdong, China. This office is free of charge as provided by Ms. Yankuan Li, our President and Chief Executive Officer.
We
currently sublease properties, covering ten classrooms and one room used for office, at Foreign Language Education Center of Shenyang
University, from Boqiao, for approximately RMB 30,000 (approximately US$4,353). The sublease terminates on November 30, 2017,
the same date as the termination of the University Cooperation Agreement, upon which we plan on entering into a separate lease
agreement directly with Foreign Language Education Center of Shenyang University, for the same properties. We may not be able
to sublease or lease the same properties after the sublease termination on November 30, 2017, in which case we will search for
other suitable facilities. For detailed discussion related to such risk, refer to Risk Factors – We currently sublease our
classrooms from Boqiao, and may not be able to enter into a lease or sublease agreement for similar terms upon expiration of the
sublease agreement.
We
believe that our current facilities are adequate and suitable for our operations.
Employees
As
of the date of this report, we had 25 employees, of which 19 are full time and 6 are part time. None of our employees are
covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We have not experienced any work stoppages and we consider our relations with our
employees to be good.
Legal
Proceedings
On
October 9, 2014, Dong Liu, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, commenced an action individually and on behalf
of the Company, against Yankuan Li, the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and director, Jiewen Li, Yuan Zhao,
a director of the Company, and Jane Yu, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. In this action,
Dong
Liu v. Yankuan Li et al., New York County Supreme Court, Index No. 653084/2014
, Dong Liu asserted claims sounding in fraud,
civil conspiracy to commit fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.
Mr.
Liu never served the complaint on the individual defendants. Instead, on November 3, 2014, Dong Liu, by order to show cause,
moved for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to enjoin the Company from proceeding with a merger with Jinke,
granting Dong Liu unfettered access to the Company’s books and records and permitting him to serve the individual defendants
by a method other than those permitted by the New York State Civil Practice and Laws or the Hague Convention on Service Abroad
of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters. On November 6, 2014, the New York Supreme Court
denied the temporary restraining order and set up a briefing schedule to determine the preliminary injunction.
On
February 18, 2015, the court issued a decision denying Dong Liu’s motion for a preliminary injunction and granting the defendants’
motion by dismissing the complaint without prejudice. Since that time, plaintiff has made no effort to re-plead the case or challenge
the ruling. Under New York court rules, plaintiff’s time to re-argue the motion or serve notice to appeal has expired.
Except
as described above, Kuncheng is not involved in any material legal proceedings outside of the ordinary course of its business.
RISK
FACTORS
In
addition to the other information contained and referred to in this report, you should consider carefully the following factors
when evaluating our business. Any of these risks, or the occurrence of any of the events described in these risk factors, could
cause our actual future results, performance or achievements to be materially different from or could materially adversely affect
our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, other risks or uncertainties not presently known to us
or that we currently do not deem material could arise, any of which could also materially adversely affect us.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
RISK
FACTORS
An
investment in our common stocks involves significant risks. You should carefully consider all of the information in this report,
including the risks and uncertainties described below, before making an investment in our common stocks. Any of the following
risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In any such case, the
market price of our common stocks could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business and Industry
We
have a limited operating history with our current business model, which makes it difficult to predict our future prospects and
financial performance.
We
have a short operating history with our current business model, since Kuncheng was established in March 2016. Our business has
generated limited gross revenues, and may not produce significant gross revenues in the near term, or at all, which may harm our
ability to obtain additional financing and may require us to reduce or discontinue our operations. If we do generate significant
gross billings and revenues in the future, we expect it will be largely from tuition revenues, and our enrollment student body
is relatively small and at its development stage. You must consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and difficulties
we may encounter as an early
-
stage operating company in a new and rapidly evolving industry. We may not be able to successfully
address these risks and difficulties, which could significantly harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
If
we are not able to continue to attract students to enroll in our A-level program and our English language courses, and attract
students to take their A-level testing at our Center, our business and prospects will be materially and adversely affected.
The
success of our business largely depends on the number of students enrolled in our current schools and in any new schools we may
establish or acquire in the future, as well as on the amount of tuition our students and parents are willing to pay. Our ability
to continue to attract students to enroll in our A-level program and our English language courses, and attract students to take
their A-level testing at our Center, are critical to the continued success and growth of our business. This in turn will depend
on several factors, including our ability to effectively market our Center to a broader base of prospective students, continue
to develop, adapt or enhance our existing programs to respond to market changes and student demands, expand our geographic reach,
and manage our growth while maintain consistent and high teaching quality and support services to meet the evolving demands of
our existing or prospective students and respond to the increasing competition in the market. We must also respond effectively
to competitive pressures. If we are unable to continue to attract students to while maintaining consistent and high teaching quality,
our gross revenue and net revenues may decline, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations. The success of our business largely depends on the number of students enrolled in our current schools
and in any new schools we may establish or acquire in the future, as well as on the amount of tuition our students and parents
are willing to pay. Therefore, our ability to continue to attract students to enroll in our schools is critical to the continued
success and growth of our business.
If
fewer Chinese students choose to study abroad, especially in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, demand for our
international program may decline.
One
of the principal drivers of the growth of our international program is the increasing number of Chinese students who choose to
study abroad, especially in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, reflecting the growing demand for higher education
in overseas countries by Chinese students. As such, any restrictive changes in immigration policy, terrorist attacks, geopolitical
uncertainties and any international conflicts involving these countries could increase the difficulty for Chinese students to
obtain student visas to study overseas, or decrease the appeal of studying in such countries to Chinese students. Any significant
change in admission standards adopted by overseas educational institutions could also affect the demand for overseas education
by Chinese students. If overseas education institutions significantly reduce their reliance on or acceptance of admission and
assessment tests, such as TOEFL, IELTS or the Scholastic Assessment Test, or the SAT, the difficulty for Chinese students to meet
the new admission standards could significantly increase, which could in turn negatively affect the demand for overseas education
by Chinese students. Additionally, Chinese students may also become less attracted to studying abroad due to other reasons, such
as improving domestic educational or employment opportunities associated with increased economic development in China. These factors
could cause declines in the demand for our international program, which may adversely affect our revenue and profitability.
We
face significant competition and we may fail to compete effectively.
The
test preparation education sector in China is rapidly evolving, highly fragmented and competitive, and we expect competition in
this sector to persist and intensify. See “Business—Competition” for more information relating to the competitive
landscape of the industry in which we compete. Competition could result in loss of market share and revenue, lower profit margins
and limitations on our future growth. Some of our competitors have much longer operating history and experience than we do, and/or
are bigger in student enrollment and/or capital resources. These competitors may devote greater resources, financial or otherwise,
than we can to student recruitment, campus development and brand promotion and respond more quickly than we can to changes in
student demands and market needs. Our student enrollment and retention may decrease due to intense competition. We may be required
to reduce tuition and other fees or increase spending in response to competition in order to attract or retain students or pursue
new market opportunities. As a result, our revenue, profit and profit margin may decrease. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to compete successfully against current or future competitors. If we are unable to maintain our competitive position or otherwise
fail to respond to competitive pressures effectively, we may lose market share and our business, financial condition and results
of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
We
may not be able to manage our business expansion and strategic acquisitions effectively.
We
plan to continue to expand our presence through organic growth and strategic acquisitions. In particular, to support our continued
growth and to strengthen our market share in the region in which we currently operate, we need to establish or acquire new schools.
We also need to establish or acquire new schools in other regions to expand geographically. Expansion has resulted, and will continue
to result, in substantial demands on our management and on our operational, technological and other resources. To manage our expected
growth, we will be required to expand our existing managerial, operational, technological and financial systems. We also need
to expand, train, manage and retain our growing employee base. Significant financial resources may also be needed to support our
planned growth. We cannot assure you that our current and planned managerial, operational, technological and financial systems
will be adequate to support our future operations, or that we will be able to effectively and efficiently manage the growth of
our operations or recruit and retain qualified personnel. There is no assurance that we will obtain financial resources at commercial
terms that are acceptable to us on a timely basis, or at all, to support our planned growth. Any failure to effectively and efficiently
manage our expansion may materially and adversely affect our ability to capitalize on new business opportunities, which in turn
may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
In
addition, as a core part of our growth strategy, we intend to pursue selective strategic acquisitions and maximize synergies through
integration of acquired entities. Our strategic acquisitions involve substantial risks and uncertainties, including:
|
●
|
our ability to identify
and acquire targets in a cost-effective manner;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our ability to obtain
approval from relevant government authorities for the acquisitions and to comply with applicable rules and regulations for
acquisitions, including those relating to the transfer of school properties and facilities relating to the acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our ability to obtain
financing to support our acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our ability to generate
sufficient revenue to offset the costs and expenses of acquisitions, including the possibility of failure to achieve the intended
revenue and other benefits expected from the acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
potential ongoing
financial obligations in connection with the acquisitions, including any expenses in connection with impairment of goodwill
recognized in connection with the acquisitions and potential unforeseen or hidden liabilities of any acquired entity, such
as litigation claims or tax liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the diversion of
resources and management attention from our existing businesses; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
potential loss of,
or harm to, employee or customer relationships as a result of ownership changes in the acquired entities.
|
If
any one or more of these risks or uncertainties materializes or if any of the strategic objectives we contemplate are not achieved,
our strategic acquisitions may not be beneficial to us and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
We
may not be able to successfully integrate businesses that we acquire, which may cause us to lose anticipated benefits from such
acquisitions and to incur significant additional expenses.
One
of our growth strategies is to grow by acquisitions of additional schools. It is challenging to integrate business operations
and management philosophies of acquired schools. The benefits of our future acquisitions depend in significant part on our ability
to integrate management, operations, technology and personnel. The integration of acquired schools is a complex, time-consuming
and expensive process that, without proper planning and implementation, could significantly disrupt our business and operations.
The main challenges involved in integrating acquired entities include the following:
|
●
|
consolidating service
offerings;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
retaining qualified
education professionals of any acquired entity;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
consolidating and
integrating corporate information technology and administrative infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
ensuring and demonstrating
to our students and their parents that the acquisitions will not result in any adverse changes to our brand image, reputation,
service quality or standards;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
preserving strategic,
marketing or other important relationships of any acquired entity and resolving potential conflicts that may arise with our
key relationships; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
minimizing the diversion
of our management’s attention from ongoing business concerns.
|
We
may not successfully integrate our operations and the operations of schools we acquire in a timely manner, or at all, and we may
not realize the anticipated benefits or synergies of the acquisitions to the extent, or in the timeframe, we anticipated, which
may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If
we are not able to continue to engage, train and retain qualified teachers, we may not be able to maintain consistent teaching
quality on our platform, and our business, financial conditions and operating results may be materially and adversely affected.
Our
teachers are critical to the learning experience of our students and our reputation. We seek to engage highly qualified teachers
with strong English and teaching skills. We must provide competitive pay and other benefits, such as flexibility in lesson scheduling
to attract and retain them. We must also provide ongoing training to our teachers to ensure that they stay abreast of changes
in course materials, student demands and other changes and trends necessary to teach effectively. Furthermore, as we continue
to develop new course contents and lesson formats, we may need to engage additional teachers with appropriate skill sets or backgrounds
to deliver instructions effectively. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to effectively engage and train such teachers quickly,
or at all. Further, given other potential more attractive opportunities for our quality teachers, over time some of them may choose
to leave our platform. For teachers who advanced to a rating of between three and five stars in the first quarter of 2015, approximately
63% of them were still with us and opened teaching slots on our platform in the first quarter of 2016. We have not experienced
major difficulties in engaging, training or retaining qualified teachers in the past, however, we may not always be able to engage,
train and retain enough qualified teachers to keep pace with our growth while maintaining consistent education quality. We may
also face significant competition in engaging qualified teachers from our competitors or from other opportunities that are perceived
as more desirable. A shortage of qualified teachers, a decrease in the quality of our teachers’ performance, whether actual or
perceived, or a significant increase in the cost to engage or retain qualified teachers would have a material adverse effect on
our business and financial conditions and results of operations.
The
private school operating permit of the Center that we operate and manage is currently expired and we may be deemed operating a
school illegally and may be subject to administrative penalties.
Operating
a private school in the PRC requires the school to be duly approved and be granted a private school operating permit, and shall
register the private school with the Ministry of Civil Affairs or its local bureaus as a privately run non-enterprise institution.
In addition, schools and their learning centers must make filings with the MOE and the Ministry of Civil Affairs or their local
bureaus. The Center which we operate and manage, had obtained the private school operating permit but the permit expired in March
2016. The Center is in the process of reinstating the private school operating permit for our Center but there is no guarantee
that we will be granted such a permit. Although there are no specific regulations that specifically state the consequences of
operating a private school without duly approval from the relevant PRC government bureaus and without a valid operating permit,
the Center’s lack of valid operating permit may cause us to be deemed as operating a private school illegally by the relevant
PRC government bureaus, and consequently may be required to cease operation of the Center and may also face administrative penalties.
All the foregoing will result in a negative impact on our financial conditions and operating results.
The
Center deregistered its taxpayer identification number at Shenyang Huanggu District, and was approved in September 2016.
The
Center does not currently have a valid taxpayer identification number. Kuncheng has been operating the International A-level program
and has remitted all relevant taxes and filed for relevant tax returns have been remitted and filed for tax return since the Center
deregistered its taxpayer identification number. In the event that the local tax authorities deem that taxes should have been
remitted by the Center itself and not by Kuncheng, then there may be negative regulatory consequences such as administrative penalties
and fines, which would negatively impact our results of operations and financial results.
If
former and/or current students demand tuition refund, our results of operation will be negatively impacted.
Students
have previously demanded tuition refund for various reasons including a previous scholarship program at the Center failed. We
are not certain if such former students or current students would demand tuition refunds from us in the future. If they so demand
tuition refunds, our reputation and results of operation will be negatively impacted.
We
face significant competition, and if we fail to compete effectively, we may lose our market share or fail to gain additional market
share, which would adversely impact our business and financial conditions and operating results.
The
study aboard testing preparation and English language education market in China is fragmented, rapidly evolving and highly competitive.
We face competition in study aboard testing preparation and English language education and other specialized areas of English
education, from existing online and offline education companies. In the future, we may also face competition from new entrants
into the English education market.
Some
of our competitors may be able to devote more resources than we can to the development and promotion of their education programs
and respond more quickly than we can to changes in student demands, market trends or new technologies. In addition, some of our
competitors may be able to respond more quickly to changes in student preferences or engage in price-cutting strategies. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors. If we are unable to maintain our
competitive position or otherwise respond to competitive pressure effectively, we may lose market share or be forced to reduce
our fees for course packages, either of which would adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
If
we fail to successfully execute our growth strategies, our business and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.
Our
growth strategies include further enhancing our brand image to grow our student base and increase student enrollments, increasing
our market penetration amongst study aboard testing preparation and English language students, expanding our course offerings,
enhancing our teaching methods, improving the learning experience of our students, and advancing our technology. We may not succeed
in executing these growth strategies due to a number of factors, including the following:
|
●
|
we may fail to further promote our programs;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
we may not be successful in effectively delivering
and promoting our group lessons with English tutors;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
we may not be able to engage, train and retain
a sufficient number of qualified teachers and other key personnel;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
we may not be able to identify suitable targets
for acquisitions and partnership.
|
If
we fail to successfully execute our growth strategies, we may not be able to maintain our growth rate and our business and prospects
may be materially and adversely affected as a result.
Higher
labor costs, inflation and implementation of stricter labor laws in the may adversely affect our business, financial conditions
and results of operations.
Labor
costs in China have increased with China’s economic development, particularly in the large cities where our offices are based.
Rising inflation in China is also putting pressure on wages and the average wage level for our employees has also increased in
recent years. In addition, we are required by PRC laws and regulations to pay various statutory employee benefits, including pensions,
housing funds, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated
governmental agencies for the benefit of our employees. We expect that our labor costs, including wages and employee benefits,
will continue to increase. Unless we are able to pass on these increased labor costs to our students by increasing prices for
our courses or improving the utilization of our staff, our profitability and results of operations may be materially and adversely
affected. Furthermore, the PRC government has promulgated new laws and regulations to enhance labor protections in recent years,
such as the Labor Contract Law and the Social Insurance Law. As the interpretation and implementation of these new laws and regulations
are still evolving, our employment practice may not at all times be deemed in compliance with the new laws and regulations. For
instance, we began outsourcing part of our marketing and sales functions to independent third party suppliers who provide management
and business outsourcing services to us in December 2015. There remains a degree of uncertainty as to whether this service
outsourcing arrangement will be deemed a labor dispatch arrangement under current PRC laws and regulations. If the authorities
take the view that this outsourcing arrangement constitutes labor dispatch and thus violates relevant labor laws, we may be ordered
to terminate this outsource arrangement and may even be fined or have our business license revoked if the relevant authorities
deem such arrangement constitutes a serious violation of the PRC laws and regulations. If we are subject to penalties or incur
significant liabilities in connection with labor disputes or investigation, our business and profitability may be adversely affected.
Some
students may decide not to continue taking our courses for a number of reasons, including a perceived lack of improvement in their
English proficiency or general dissatisfaction with our programs, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition,
results of operations and reputation.
The
success of our business depends in large part on our ability to retain our students by delivering a satisfactory learning experience
and improving their English proficiency. If students feel that we are not providing them the experience they are seeking, they
may choose not to renew their existing packages. For example, our education programs may fail to significantly improve a student’s
English proficiency. There are no standard assessments or tests to measure the effectiveness of our lessons or teaching methods,
and our ability to improve the English proficiency of our students is largely dependent upon the interests, efforts and time commitment
of each student. Student and, for K-12 students, parent satisfaction with our programs may decline for a number of reasons,
many of which may not reflect the effectiveness of our lessons and teaching methods. A student’s learning experience may also
suffer if his or her relationship with our teachers and teaching assistants does not meet expectations. We have observed an increase
in forfeiture rate historically, which may negatively impact the perceived effectiveness of our curriculum and the level of student
engagement on our platform. For a discussion of our student base and engagement level, see “Business—Our Strengths—Rapidly-increasing
student base and engagement.” If a significant number of students fail to significantly improve their English proficiency
after taking our lessons or if their learning experiences with us are unsatisfactory, they may not purchase additional lessons
from us or refer other students to us and our business, financial condition, results of operations and reputation would be adversely
affected.
Capacity
constraints of our school facilities could cause us to lose students to our competitors.
The
educational facilities of our schools are limited in space and size. We may not be able to admit all qualified students who would
like to enroll in our educational programs due to the capacity constraints of our current school facilities. If we fail to expand
our physical capacity as quickly as the demand for our services grows, or if we otherwise fail to grow by establishing or acquiring
additional schools and campuses, we could lose potential students to our competitors, and our results of operations and business
prospects could suffer as a result.
We
may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property.
Unauthorized
use of any of our intellectual property may adversely affect our business and reputation. We rely on a combination of copyright,
trademark and trade secrets laws to protect our intellectual property rights. Nevertheless, third-parties may obtain and use our
intellectual property without due authorization. The practice of intellectual property rights enforcement action by Chinese regulatory
authorities is in its early stage of development and is subject to significant uncertainty. We may also need to resort to litigation
and other legal proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights. Any such action, litigation or other legal proceedings
could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention and resources and could disrupt our business.
In addition, there is no assurance that we will be able to enforce our intellectual property rights effectively or otherwise prevent
others from the unauthorized use of our intellectual property. Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property could materially
and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The
Center’s choice of its Chinese registered name may result in a potential trademark infringement claim brought against us
by Pearson
.
The
Center’s Chinese name is “爱得思,” which is the Chinese named used by Pearson’s Edexcel
in the PRC market. After Pearson acquired Edexcel, was chosen before Pearson acquired Edexcel. Pearson had previously approached
the Center to suggest it change its legal entity name, and may bring a potential claim for trademark infringement against us in
the PRC. For more detailed information, refer to Item 2.01 – Business – Intellectual Property. Defending a potential
trademark infringement claim is costly in financial resources and the time of our executives and employees, and we may be required
to change our registered name, all of which would result in negative impact on our financial performance and results of operation.
We
may encounter disputes from time to time relating to our use of intellectual property of third parties.
We
cannot be certain that third parties will not claim that our business infringes upon or otherwise violates patents, copyrights
or other intellectual property rights that they hold. We cannot assure you that third parties will not claim that our courses
and marketing materials, online courses, products, and platform or other intellectual property developed or used by us infringe
upon valid copyrights or other intellectual property rights that they hold. We may be subject to claims by educational institutions
and organizations, content providers and publishers, competitors and others on the grounds of intellectual property rights infringement,
defamation, negligence or other legal theories based on the content of the materials that we or our teachers distribute or use
in our business operation. These types of claims have been brought, sometimes successfully, against print publications and educational
institutions in the past. We may encounter disputes from time to time over rights and obligations concerning intellectual property,
and we may not prevail in those disputes.
Any
claims against us, with or without merit, could be time consuming and costly to defend or litigate, divert our management’s attention
and resources or result in the loss of goodwill associated with our brand. If a lawsuit against us is successful, we may be required
to pay substantial damages and/or enter into royalty or license agreements that may not be based upon commercially reasonable
terms, or we may be unable to enter into such agreements at all. We may also lose, or be limited in, the rights to offer some
of our programs, parts of our platform and products or be required to make changes to our course materials or websites. As a result,
the scope of our course materials could be reduced, which could adversely affect the effectiveness of our curriculum, limit our
ability to attract new students, harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
position.
We
may not be able to achieve the benefits we expect from recent and future acquisitions, and recent and future acquisitions may
have an adverse effect on our ability to manage our business.
We
have made and intend to continue to make acquisitions or equity investments in additional businesses that complement our existing
business. We may not be able to successfully integrate acquired businesses and we may not have control over the businesses or
operations of our minority equity investments, the value of which may decline over time. As a result, our business and operating
results could be harmed. In addition, if the businesses we acquire or invest in do not subsequently generate the anticipated financial
performance or if any goodwill impairment test triggering event occurs, we may need to revalue or write down the value of goodwill
and other intangible assets in connection with such acquisitions or investments, which would harm our results of operations. In
addition, we may be unable to identify appropriate acquisition or strategic investment targets when it is necessary or desirable
to make such acquisition or investment to remain competitive or to expand our business. Even if we identify an appropriate acquisition
or investment target, we may not be able to negotiate the terms of the acquisition or investment successfully, finance the proposed
transaction or integrate the relevant businesses into our existing business and operations.
We
currently sublease our classrooms from Boqiao, and may not be able to enter into a lease or sublease agreement for similar terms
upon expiration of the sublease agreement.
As
of the date of this report, we sublease all ten of our classrooms and an office from Boqiao, who leases the same properties with
Foreign Language Education Center of Shenyang University pursuant to the University Cooperation Agreement. Boqiao is an affiliated
party of Gu Wei, the Center’s sponsor, of whom Boqiao and the Center are under common control. Our sublease agreement with
Boqiao shall expire on November 30, 2017, the same date that the University Cooperation Agreement terminates. We may not be able
to enter into a separate lease agreement with Shenyang University upon expiration of our sublease agreement with Boqiao, which
may cause interruptions to our business operations; or we may not be able to lease classrooms at a comparable rate as we currently
have, and our results of operation will be negatively impacted.
If
our senior management is unable to work together effectively or efficiently or if we lose their services, our business may be
severely disrupted.
Our
success heavily depends upon the continued services of our management. In particular, we rely on the expertise and experience
of Mr. Yang, our founder and chief executive officer. If Mr. Yang or one or more of our senior management were unable or
unwilling to continue in their present positions, we might not be able to replace them easily or at all, and our business, financial
condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. If Mr. Yang or any of our senior management joins
a competitor or forms a competing business, we may lose students, teachers, and other key professionals and staff members.
If any dispute arises between our officers and us, we may have to incur substantial costs and expenses in order to enforce such
agreements in China or we may be unable to enforce them at all.
Our
results of operations are subject to seasonal fluctuations.
Our
industry generally experiences seasonality, reflecting a combination of traditional education industry patterns. Seasonal fluctuations
have affected, and are likely to continue to affect, our business. In general, our industry experiences lower gross revenue growth
in the first quarter of each year due to the Chinese New Year holiday, and our industry enjoys higher gross revenue growth in
the first and third quarters of a calendar year where the academic semesters begin and enrollments primarily occur. We have experienced
higher gross revenue growth in the third quarter of the calendar year since our inception, but due to our limited operating history,
the seasonal trends that we have experienced in the past may not be indicative of our future operating results. Our financial
condition and results of operations for future periods may continue to fluctuate. As a result, the trading price of our common
stock may fluctuate from time to time due to seasonality.
We
have limited insurance coverage for our operations in China, which could expose us to significant costs and business disruption.
We
do not maintain any liability insurance or property insurance policies covering students, equipment and facilities for injuries,
death or losses due to fire, earthquake, flood or any other disaster. Consistent with customary industry practice in China, we
do not maintain business interruption insurance, nor do we maintain key-man life insurance. We maintain medical insurance for
our management in China. As the insurance industry in China is still in an early stage of development, insurance companies in
China currently offer limited business-related insurance products. We do not maintain business interruption insurance. We cannot
assure you that our insurance coverage is sufficient to prevent us from any loss or that we will be able to successfully claim
our losses under our current insurance policy on a timely basis, or at all. If we incur any loss that is not covered by our insurance
policies, or the compensated amount is significantly less than our actual loss, our business, financial condition and results
of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
If
additional remedial measures are imposed on the Big Four PRC-based accounting firms, and our independent registered public accounting
firm, in administrative proceedings brought by the SEC alleging the firms’ failure to meet specific criteria set by the SEC, we
could be unable to timely file future financial statements in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act.
In
December 2012, the SEC instituted administrative proceedings under Rule 102(e)(1)(iii) of the SEC’s Rules of Practice against
the Big Four PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, alleging that these firms
had violated U.S. securities laws and the SEC’s rules and regulations thereunder by failing to provide to the SEC the firms’ audit
work papers with respect to certain PRC-based companies that are publicly traded in the United States. Rule 102(e)(1)(iii)
authorizes the SEC to deny any person, temporarily or permanently, the ability to practice before the SEC if found by the SEC,
after notice and opportunity for a hearing, to have willfully violated any such laws or rules and regulations. On January 22,
2014, the administrative law judge, or the ALJ, presiding over the matter rendered an initial decision that each of the firms
had violated the SEC’s rules of practice by failing to produce audit workpapers to the SEC. The initial decision censured each
of the firms and barred them from practicing before the SEC for a period of six months. On February 12, 2014, the Big Four
PRC-based accounting firms appealed the ALJ’s initial decision to the SEC. The ALJ’s decision does not take effect unless and
until it is endorsed by the SEC. On February 6, 2015, the four China-based accounting firms each agreed to a censure and
to pay a fine to the SEC to settle the dispute and avoid suspension of their ability to practice before the SEC and audit U.S.-listed
companies. The settlement required the firms to follow detailed procedures and to seek to provide the SEC with access to Chinese
firms’ audit documents via the China Securities Regulation Commission, or the CSRC, in response to future document requests by
the SEC made through the CSRC. If the Big Four and all other PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered
public accounting firm, fail to comply with the documentation production procedures that have been prescribed in the settlement
agreement or if there is a failure of the process between the SEC and the CSRC, the SEC retains authority to impose a variety
of additional remedial measures on the firms, such as imposing penalties on the firms and restarting the proceedings against the
firms, depending on the nature of the failure.
In
the event that the SEC restarts the administrative proceedings, depending upon the final outcome, listed companies in the United
States with major PRC operations may find it difficult or impossible to retain auditors in respect of their operations in the
PRC, which could result in financial statements being determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange
Act, including possible delisting. Moreover, any negative news about the proceedings against these audit firms may cause investor
uncertainty regarding PRC-based, United States-listed companies and the market price of our Common Stock may be adversely affected.
If
the accounting firms are subject to additional remedial measures, our ability to file our financial statements in compliance with
SEC requirements could be adversely impacted. A determination that we have not timely filed financial statements in compliance
with SEC requirements could ultimately lead to the termination of the registration of our Common Stock under the Exchange Act,
which would substantially reduce or effectively terminate the trading of our Common Stock.
Adverse
capital and credit market conditions may significantly affect our ability to meet liquidity needs, access to capital and cost
of capital.
The
capital and credit markets have previously experienced extreme volatility and disruption, including, among other things, extreme
volatility in securities prices, severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, ratings downgrades of certain investments
and declining valuations of others. Governments have taken unprecedented actions intended to address extreme market conditions
that have included severely restricted credit and declines in real estate values. In some cases, the markets have exerted downward
pressure on availability of liquidity and credit capacity for certain issuers. While historically these conditions have not impaired
our ability to utilize our current credit facilities and finance our operations or obtaining advances from our shareholders, there
can be no assurance that there will not be deterioration in financial markets and confidence in major economies such that our
ability to access credit markets and finance our operations might be impaired. Without sufficient liquidity, we may be forced
to curtail our operations and any planned expansion. Adverse market conditions may limit our ability to replace, in a timely manner,
maturing liabilities and access the capital necessary to operate and grow our business. As such, we may be forced to delay raising
capital or bear an unattractive cost of capital which could decrease our profitability and significantly reduce our financial
flexibility. The tightening of credit in financial markets could adversely affect the ability of our customers to obtain financing
for purchases of our products and could result in a decrease in or cancellation of orders for our products. Our results of operations,
financial condition, cash flows and capital position could be materially adversely affected by disruptions in the financial markets.
Our
stock price may be negatively affected if we become subject to the recent scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity involving
U.S. listed Chinese companies.
Recently,
U.S. public companies that have substantially all of their operations in China, particularly companies like us which have completed
share exchanges or reverse merger transactions, have been the subject of intense scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity by
investors, financial commentators and regulatory agencies, such as the SEC. Much of the scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity
has centered around financial and accounting irregularities and mistakes, a lack of effective internal controls over financial
accounting, inadequate corporate governance policies or a lack of adherence thereto and, in many cases, allegations of fraud.
As a result of the scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity, the publicly traded stock of many U.S.-listed Chinese companies
has sharply decreased in value and, in some cases, has become virtually worthless. Many of these companies are now subject to
shareholder lawsuits and SEC enforcement actions, and are conducting internal and external investigations into the allegations.
It is not clear what effect this sector-wide scrutiny, criticism and negative publicity will have on our Company, our business
and our stock price. If we become the subject of any unfavorable allegations, whether such allegations are proven to be true or
untrue, we will have to expend significant resources to investigate such allegations and/or defend our company. This situation
will be costly and time consuming and distract our management from growing our company. If such allegations are not proven to
be groundless, our company and business operations will be severely negatively affected and your investment in our stock could
be rendered worthless.
Our
independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
We
have accumulated deficit of $683,030 as of December 31, 2016 and $774,829 as of June 30, 2017, we have incurred a net loss
of $683,030 for the period of March 30, 2016 to December 31, 2016 and of $91,800 for the six months ended June 30, 2017. We
do not have sufficient cash to pay PRC taxes and repay loans. The future of our company is dependent upon future profitable
operations from Kuncheng and the continuing financial support from our stockholders or other capital sources. Our management
will need to seek additional financing in the future. In addition, the presence of the going concern explanatory paragraph
may have an adverse impact on our relationship with third parties with whom we do business, including our customers, vendors
and employees and could make it challenging and difficult for us to raise additional debt or equity financing to the extent
needed, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about our company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Although there are
no assurances that our plans will be realized, our management believes that we will be able to continue operations in the
future.
Additionally,
we cannot assure you that we will be able to generate net profits or positive cash flow from operating activities in the future.
Our ability to achieve profitability will depend in large part on our ability to increase our operating margin, either by growing
our revenues at a rate faster than our operating expenses increase, or by reducing our operating expenses, especially our sales
and market expenses, as a percentage of our net revenues. Accordingly, we intend to continue to invest in our branding and marketing
activities to attract new students. As a result of the foregoing, we believe that we may continue to incur net losses for a period
of time in the future.
Risks
Relating to Our Corporate Structure
The
draft Foreign Investment Law proposes sweeping changes to the PRC foreign investment legal regime and will likely to have a significant
impact on businesses in China controlled by foreign invested enterprises primarily through contractual arrangements, such as our
business.
On
January 19, 2015, MOFCOM published a draft of the PRC Law on Foreign Investment (Draft for Comment), or the Foreign Investment
Law, which is open for public comments until February 17, 2015. At the same time, MOFCOM published an accompanying explanatory
note of the draft Foreign Investment Law, or the Explanatory Note, which contains important information about the draft Foreign
Investment Law, including its drafting philosophy and principles, main content, plans to transition to the new legal regime and
treatment of business in China controlled by
foreign invested enterprises
,
or FIEs, primarily through
contractual arrangements. The draft Foreign Investment Law is intended to replace the current foreign investment legal regime
consisting of three laws: the Sino-Foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-Foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise
Law and the Wholly Foreign-Invested Enterprise Law, as well as detailed implementing rules. The draft Foreign Investment Law proposes
significant changes to the PRC foreign investment legal regime and may have a material impact on Chinese companies listed or to
be listed overseas. The proposed Foreign Investment Law is to regulate FIEs the same way as PRC domestic entities, except
for those FIEs that operate in industries deemed to be either “restricted” or “prohibited” in a “Negative
List.” Because the Negative List has yet to be published, it is unclear whether it will differ from the current list
of industries subject to restrictions or prohibitions on foreign investment (including our industry). The draft Foreign Investment
Law also provides that only FIEs operating in industries on the Negative List will require entry clearance and other approvals
that are not required of PRC domestic entities. As a result of the entry clearance and approvals, certain FIE’s operating
in industries on the Negative List may not be able to continue to conduct their operations through contractual arrangements.
There
is substantial uncertainty regarding the draft Foreign Investment Law, including, among others, what the actual content of the
law will be as well as the adoption timeline or effective date of the final form of the law. While such uncertainty exists, we
cannot determine whether the new foreign investment law, when it is adopted and becomes effective, will not have a material positive
or negative impact on our corporate structure and business.
RISKS
RELATED TO DOING BUSINESS IN CHINA
Substantially
all of our assets are located in the PRC and substantially all of our revenues are derived from our operations in China, and changes
in the political and economic policies of the PRC government could have a significant impact upon the business we may be able
to conduct in the PRC and accordingly on the results of our operations and financial condition.
Our
business operations may be adversely affected by the current and future political environment in the PRC. The Chinese government
exerts substantial influence and control over the manner in which we must conduct our business activities. Our ability to operate
in China may be adversely affected by changes in Chinese laws and regulations, including those relating to taxation, import and
export tariffs, raw materials, environmental regulations, land use rights, property and other matters. Under the current government
leadership, the government of the PRC has been pursuing economic reform policies that encourage private economic activities and
greater economic decentralization. There is no assurance, however, that the government of the PRC will continue to pursue these
policies, or that it will not significantly alter these policies from time to time without advance notice.
Our
operations are subject to PRC laws and regulations that are sometimes vague and uncertain. Any changes in such PRC laws and regulations,
or the interpretations thereof, may have a material and adverse effect on our business.
The
PRC’s legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system prevalent in the United
States, decided legal cases have little value as precedent in China. There are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation
and application of PRC laws and regulations, including but not limited to, governmental approvals required for conducting business
and investments, laws and regulations governing the battery industry, national security-related laws and regulations and export/import
laws and regulations, as well as commercial, antitrust, patent, product liability, environmental laws and regulations, consumer
protection, and financial and business taxation laws and regulations.
The
Chinese government has been developing a comprehensive system of commercial laws, and considerable progress has been made in introducing
laws and regulations dealing with economic matters such as foreign investment, corporate organization and governance, commerce,
taxation and trade. However, because these laws and regulations are relatively new, and because of the limited volume of published
cases and judicial interpretation and their lack of force as precedents, interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations
involve significant uncertainties. New laws and regulations that affect existing and proposed future businesses may also be applied
retroactively.
PRC
regulations relating to acquisitions of PRC companies by foreign entities may create regulatory uncertainties that could restrict
or limit our ability to operate, including our ability to pay dividends. Our failure to obtain the prior approval of the China
Securities Regulatory Commission, or the CSRC, for any offering of our common stock could have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results, reputation and trading price of our common stock.
The
PRC State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or “SAFE,” issued a public notice in November 2005, known as Circular
75, concerning the use of offshore holding companies in mergers and acquisitions in China. The public notice provides that if
an offshore company controlled by PRC residents intends to acquire a PRC company, such acquisition will be subject to registration
with the relevant foreign exchange authorities. The public notice also suggests that registration with the relevant foreign exchange
authorities is required for any sale or transfer by the PRC residents of shares in an offshore holding company that owns an onshore
company. The PRC residents must each submit a registration form to the local SAFE branch with respect to their ownership interests
in the offshore company, and must also file an amendment to such registration if the offshore company experiences material events,
such as changes in the share capital, share transfer, mergers and acquisitions, spin-off transactions or use of assets in China
to guarantee offshore obligations. If any PRC resident stockholder of an offshore holding company fails to make the required SAFE
registration and amended registration, the onshore PRC subsidiaries of that offshore company may be prohibited from distributing
their profits and the proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to the offshore entity. In May 2011,
the SAFE promulgated new operational rules, known as Notice 19, for the implementation of Circular 75. Failure to comply with
the SAFE registration and amendment requirements of Circular 75, as applied by SAFE in accordance with Notice 19 could result
in liability under PRC laws for evasion of applicable foreign exchange restrictions. Because of uncertainty of how the SAFE notice
will be further interpreted and enforced, we cannot be sure how it will affect our business operations or future plans. For example,
our subsidiaries’ ability to conduct foreign exchange activities, such as the remittance of dividends and foreign currency-denominated
borrowings, may be subject to compliance with the SAFE notice by our PRC resident beneficial holders. Failure by our PRC resident
beneficial holders could subject these PRC resident beneficial holders to fines or legal sanctions, restrict our overseas or cross-border
investment activities, limit our subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions or pay dividends or affect our ownership structure,
which could adversely affect our business and prospects.
On
August 8, 2006, the PRC Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”), joined by the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration
Commission of the State Council, the State Administration of Taxation, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the
China Securities Regulatory Commission and SAFE, released a substantially amended version of the Provisions for Foreign Investors
to Merge with or Acquire Domestic Enterprises (the “Revised M&A Regulations”), which took effect on September
8, 2006. These rules significantly revised China’s regulatory framework governing onshore-to-offshore restructurings and
foreign acquisitions of domestic enterprises. These rules implemented greater PRC government attention to cross-border merger,
acquisition and other investment activities, by confirming MOFCOM as a key regulator for issues related to mergers and acquisitions
in China and requiring MOFCOM approval of a broad range of merger, acquisition and investment transactions. Further, the rules
established reporting requirements for acquisition of control by foreigners of companies in key industries, and reinforce the
ability of the Chinese government to monitor and prohibit foreign control transactions in key industries.
If
the CSRC or another PRC regulatory agency subsequently determines that CSRC approval was required for any transaction not receiving
prior approval, we may face regulatory actions or other sanctions from the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies. These regulatory
agencies may impose fines and penalties on our operations in the PRC, limit our operating privileges in the PRC, delay or restrict
the repatriation of the proceeds from an offering of securities into the PRC, or take other actions that could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as the trading price
of our common stock. The CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies also may take actions requiring us, or making it advisable for
us, to halt any offering before settlement and delivery of the securities offered. Consequently, if investors engage in market
trading or other activities in anticipation of and prior to settlement and delivery, they do so at the risk that settlement and
delivery may not occur.
Also,
if later the CSRC requires that we obtain its approval for any transaction not receiving prior approval, we may be unable to obtain
a waiver of the CSRC approval requirements, if and when procedures are established to obtain such a waiver. Any uncertainties
and/or negative publicity regarding this CSRC approval requirement could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of
our common stock.
Furthermore,
the Circular on establishing the Security Review System for Merger and Acquisition of Domestic Enterprise by Foreign Investors
was promulgated by the General Office of the State Council on February 3, 2011 and the Ministry of Commerce issued the corresponding
implementation rules on August 25, 2011, as supplemented further in June 17, 2014. According to these rules, a foreign investor’s
acquisitions of Chinese companies in the fields of military, energy and resources, infrastructure, important agricultural products,
infrastructure, transport service, key technology and major equipment manufacturing, and other restricted fields requires security
review by both the National Development and Reform Commission and the relevant local government entities.
Complying
with the requirements of the above rules to complete such transactions could be time-consuming, and any required approval processes
may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such transactions, which could also affect our ability to expand our business.
We
face uncertainty from China’s Circular on Strengthening the Administration of Enterprise Income Tax on Non-Resident Enterprises’
Share Transfer (“Circular 698”) that was released in December 2009 with retroactive effect from January 1, 2008.
The
Chinese State Administration of Taxation (SAT) released a circular (Guoshuihan No. 698 - Circular 698) on December 15, 2009 that
addresses the transfer of shares by nonresident companies. Circular 698, which is effective retroactively to January 1, 2008,
may have a significant impact on many companies that use offshore holding companies to invest in China. Circular 698, which
provides parties with a short period of time to comply its requirements, indirectly taxes foreign companies on gains derived from
the indirect sale of a Chinese company. Where a foreign investor indirectly transfers equity interests in a Chinese resident
enterprise by selling the shares in an offshore holding company, and the latter is located in a country or jurisdiction where
the effective tax burden is less than 12.5% or where the offshore income of his, her, or its residents is not taxable, the foreign
investor is required to provide the tax authority in charge of that Chinese resident enterprise with the relevant information
within 30 days of the transfers. Moreover, where a foreign investor indirectly transfers equity interests in a Chinese resident
enterprise through an abuse of form of organization and there are no reasonable commercial purposes such that the corporate income
tax liability is avoided, the PRC tax authority will have the power to re-assess the nature of the equity transfer in accordance
with PRC’s “substance-over-form” principle and deny the existence of the offshore holding company that is used
for tax planning purposes.
The
SAT issued Bulletin of the State of Taxation [2011] No. 24 (Bulletin) on March 28, 2011, in which various issues regarding the
tax administration for non-PRC resident enterprises and clarifications on Circular 698 were addressed. The Bulletin defined some
parameters stipulated in Circular 698, which, if a non-resident enterprise were to fall under, would be subject to the Circular
requirements including that (a) “foreign investor (party with effective control)” applies to all foreign investors
who have indirectly transferred a Chinese resident enterprise and (b) that “effective tax burden” refers to the effective
tax imposed on the gains on the share transfer transaction per se. However, the SAT is expected to issue further clarification
and guidance with regard to how to decide “abuse of form of organization” and “reasonable commercial purpose,”
which can be utilized by us to determine if we comply with Circular 698.
If
we fail to comply with the requirements under Circular 698 and the Bulletin, we may become at risk of being taxed and we may also
be required to expend valuable resources to comply with Circular 698 and the Bulletin or to establish that we should not be taxed,
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The
foreign currency exchange rate between U.S. Dollars and Renminbi could adversely affect our financial condition.
To
the extent that we need to convert U.S. Dollars into Renminbi for our operational needs, our financial position and the price
of our common stock may be adversely affected should the Renminbi appreciate against the U.S. Dollar at that time. Conversely,
if we decide to convert Renminbi into U.S. Dollars for the operational needs or paying dividends on our common stock, the dollar
equivalent of our earnings from our subsidiaries in China would be reduced should the dollar appreciate against the Renminbi.
Until
1994, the Renminbi experienced a gradual but significant devaluation against most major currencies, including dollars, and there
was a significant devaluation of the Renminbi on January 1, 1994 in connection with the replacement of the dual exchange rate
system with a unified managed floating rate foreign exchange system. Since 1994, the value of the Renminbi relative to the U.S.
Dollar has remained stable and has appreciated slightly against the U.S. Dollar. Countries, including the United States, have
argued that the Renminbi is artificially undervalued due to China’s current monetary policies and have pressured China to
allow the Renminbi to float freely in world markets. In July 2005, the PRC government changed its policy of pegging the value
of the Renminbi to the dollar. Under the new policy the Renminbi is permitted to fluctuate within a narrow and managed band against
a basket of designated foreign currencies. While the international reaction to the Renminbi revaluation has generally been positive,
there remains significant international pressure on the PRC government to adopt an even more flexible currency policy, which could
result in further and more significant appreciation of the Renminbi against the dollar.
Inflation
in the PRC could negatively affect our profitability and growth.
While
the PRC economy has experienced rapid growth, such growth has been uneven among various sectors of the economy and in different
geographical areas of the country. Rapid economic growth can lead to growth in the money supply and rising inflation. According
to the National Bureau of Statistics of China, China’s Average consumer Price Index was 2.6% in 2013. If prices for our
products and services rise at a rate that is insufficient to compensate for the rise in the costs of supplies such as raw materials,
it may have an adverse effect on our profitability.
Furthermore,
In order to control inflation in the past, the PRC government has imposed controls on bank credits, limits on loans for fixed
assets and restrictions on state bank lending. In January 2010, the Chinese government took steps to tighten the availability
of credit including ordering banks to increase the amount of reserves they hold and to reduce or limit their lending. The implementation
of such policies may impede economic growth. In October 2004, the People’s Bank of China, the PRC’s central bank,
raised interest rates for the first time in nearly a decade and indicated in a statement that the measure was prompted by inflationary
concerns in the Chinese economy. In April 2006, the People’s Bank of China raised the interest rate again. Repeated rises
in interest rates by the central bank would likely slow economic activity in China which could, in turn, materially increase our
costs and also reduce demand for our products and services.
Because
our funds are held in banks that do not provide insurance, the failure of any bank in which we deposit our funds could affect
our ability to continue in business.
Banks
and other financial institutions in the PRC do not provide insurance for funds held on deposit. A significant portion of our assets
are in the form of cash deposited with banks in the PRC, and in the event of a bank failure, we may not have access to our funds
on deposit. Depending upon the amount of money we maintain in a bank that fails, our inability to have access to our cash could
impair our operations, and, if we are not able to access funds to pay suppliers, employees and other creditors, we may be unable
to continue in business.
Failure
to comply with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act could subject us to penalties and other adverse consequences.
As
our ultimate holding company is a Florida corporation, we are subject to the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which
generally prohibits United States companies from engaging in bribery or other prohibited payments to foreign officials for the
purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Foreign companies, including some that may compete with us, are not subject to these
prohibitions. Corruption, extortion, bribery, pay-offs, theft and other fraudulent practices may occur from time-to-time in the
PRC. We can make no assurance, however, that our employees or other agents will not engage in such conduct for which we might
be held responsible. If our employees or other agents are found to have engaged in such practices, we could suffer severe penalties
and other consequences that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Dividends
payable by us to our foreign investors and any gain on the sale of our shares may be subject to taxes under PRC tax laws.
If
dividends payable to our shareholders are treated as income derived from sources within China, then the dividends that shareholders
receive from us, and any gain on the sale or transfer of our shares, may be subject to taxes under PRC tax laws.
In
January 2009, the State Administration of Taxation promulgated the Provisional Measures for the Administration of Withholding
of Enterprise Income Tax for Non-resident Enterprises (“Measures”), pursuant to which, the entities which have the
direct obligation to make the following payment to a non-resident enterprise shall be the relevant tax withholders for such non-resident
enterprise, and such payment includes: incomes from equity investment (including dividends and other return on investment), interests,
rents, royalties, and incomes from assignment of property as well as other incomes subject to enterprise income tax received by
non-resident enterprises in China. Further, the Measures provides that in case of equity transfer between two non-resident enterprises
which occurs outside China, the non-resident enterprise which receives the equity transfer payment shall, by itself or engage
an agent to, file tax declaration with the PRC tax authority located at place of the PRC company whose equity has been transferred,
and the PRC company whose equity has been transferred shall assist the tax authorities to collect taxes from the relevant non-resident
enterprise. However, it is unclear whether the Measures refer to the equity transfer by a non-resident enterprise which is a direct
or an indirect shareholder of the said PRC company. Given these Measures, there is a possibility that we may have an obligation
to withhold income tax in respect of the dividends paid to non-resident enterprise investors.
Because
our business is located in the PRC, we may have difficulty establishing adequate management, legal and financial controls, which
are required in order to comply with U.S. securities laws.
PRC
companies have historically not adopted a western style of management and financial reporting concepts and practices, which includes
strong corporate governance, internal controls and, computer, financial and other control systems. Most of our middle and top
management staff are not educated and trained in the Western system, and we may have difficulty in hiring new employees in the
PRC with such training. In addition, we may have difficulty in hiring and retaining a sufficient number of qualified employees
to work in the PRC. As a result of these factors, we may experience difficulty in establishing management, legal and financial
controls, collecting financial data and preparing financial statements, books of account and corporate records and instituting
business practices that meet Western standards. Therefore, we may, in turn, experience difficulties in implementing and maintaining
adequate internal controls as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This may result in significant deficiencies
or material weaknesses in our internal controls which could impact the reliability of our financial statements and prevent us
from complying with SEC rules and regulations and the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Any such deficiencies, weaknesses
or lack of compliance could have a materially adverse effect on our business.
Investors
may experience difficulties in effecting service of legal process, enforcing foreign judgments or bringing original actions in
China based upon U.S. laws, including the federal securities laws or other foreign laws against us or our management.
Most
of our current operations, including the manufacture and distribution of our products, are conducted in China. Moreover, most
of our directors and officers are nationals and residents of China Mainland or Hong Kong: Ms. Jane Yu, Ms. Li Yankuan, Mr. Kunyuan
Yang, Mr. Zhao Yuan are residents of China Mainland. All or substantially all of the assets of these persons are located outside
the United States and in the PRC. As a result, it may not be possible to effect service of process within the United States or
elsewhere outside China upon these persons. In addition, uncertainties exist as to whether the courts of China would recognize
or enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained against us or such officers and/or directors predicated upon the civil liability
provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof, or be competent to hear original actions brought
in China against us or such persons predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof.
Contract
drafting, interpretation and enforcement in China involve significant uncertainties.
We
have entered into numerous contracts governed by PRC law, many of which are material to our business. As compared with contracts
in the United States, contracts governed by PRC law tend to contain less detail and are not as comprehensive in defining contracting
parties’ rights and obligations. As a result, contracts in China are more vulnerable to disputes and legal challenges. In
addition, contract interpretation and enforcement in China is not as developed as in the United States, and the result of any
contract dispute is subject to significant uncertainties. Therefore, we cannot assure that we will not be subject to disputes
under our material contracts, and if such disputes arise, we cannot assure that we will prevail.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR CAPITAL STRUCTURE
There
is no active trading market for our Common Stock, and there is no assurance of an established public trading market, which would
adversely affect the ability of our investors to sell their securities in the public market.
Our
common stock is currently traded on the Over the Counter Pink market where we expect it to remain in the foreseeable future. Broker-dealers
often decline to trade in OTC Pink stocks given the factors that the markets for such securities are often limited, the stocks
are more volatile, and the risk to investors is greater. These factors may reduce the potential market for our common stock by
reducing the number of potential investors. This may make it more difficult for investors in our common stock to sell shares to
third parties or to otherwise dispose of their shares. This could cause our stock price to decline. We currently do not intend
to apply to list on NASDAQ Capital Market or the NYSE MKT, but if we do decide to apply, there is no guarantee that we will meet
the specific listing standards of NASDAQ or NYSE MKT.
The
market price and trading volume of shares of our Common Stock may be volatile.
When
and if an active market develops for our securities, the market price of our Common Stock could fluctuate significantly for many
reasons, including reasons unrelated to our specific performance, such as reports by industry analysts, investor perceptions,
or announcements by our competitors regarding their own performance, as well as general economic and industry conditions. For
example, to the extent that other large companies within our industry experience declines in their share price, our share price
may decline as well. Fluctuations in operating results or the failure of operating results to meet the expectations of public
market analysts and investors may negatively impact the price of our securities. Quarterly operating results may fluctuate in
the future due to a variety of factors that could negatively affect revenues or expenses in any particular quarter, including
vulnerability of our business to a general economic downturn; changes in the laws that affect our products or operations; competition;
compensation related expenses; application of accounting standards; and our ability to obtain and maintain all necessary regulatory
and industry certifications and/or approvals to conduct our business. In addition, when the market price of a company’s
shares drops significantly, shareholders could institute securities class action lawsuits against the Company. A lawsuit against
us could cause us to incur substantial costs and could divert the time and attention of our management and other resources.
If
we fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, the price of our Common Stock may be adversely affected.
We
are required to establish and maintain appropriate internal controls over financial reporting. Failure to establish those controls,
or any failure of those controls once established, could adversely impact our public disclosures regarding our business, financial
condition or results of operations. Any failure of these controls could also prevent us from maintaining accurate accounting records
and discovering accounting errors and financial frauds. Rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 require annual assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. The standards that must be met for management
to assess the internal control over financial reporting as effective complex, and require significant documentation, testing and
possible remediation to meet the detailed standards. We may encounter problems or delays in completing activities necessary to
make an assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. If we cannot assess our internal control over financial reporting
as effective, investor confidence and share value may be negatively impacted.
In
addition, management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting may identify weaknesses and conditions that
need to be addressed in our internal controls over financial reporting or other matters that may raise concerns for investors.
Any actual or perceived weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting or
disclosure of management’s assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting may have an adverse impact on the
price of our common stock.
Compliance
with changing regulations of corporate governance and public disclosure will result in additional expenses.
Changing
laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and related SEC regulations, have created uncertainty for public companies and significantly increased the costs and risks associated
with accessing the public markets and public reporting. For example, on January 30, 2009, the SEC adopted rules requiring companies
to provide their financial statements in interactive data format using the eXtensible Business Reporting Language, or XBRL. Our
management team will need to invest significant management time and financial resources to comply with both existing and evolving
standards for public companies, which will lead to increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management
time and attention from revenue generating activities to compliance activities.
Our
Common Stock may be considered a “penny stock,” and thereby be subject to additional sale and trading regulations
that may make it more difficult to sell.
Our
Common Stock may be considered to be a “penny stock” if it does not qualify for one of the exemptions from the definition
of “penny stock” under Section 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act for 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”),
once, and if, it starts trading. Our Common Stock may be a “penny stock” if it meets one or more of the following
conditions (i) the stock trades at a price less than $5.00 per share; (ii) it is NOT traded on a “recognized” national
exchange; (iii) it is NOT quoted on the Nasdaq Capital Market, or even if so, has a price less than $5.00 per share; or (iv) is
issued by a company that has been in business less than three years with net tangible assets less than $5 million.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The
information contained in this report, including in the documents incorporated by reference into this report, includes some statement
that are not purely historical and that are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited
to, statements regarding our and our management’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future,
including our financial condition, results of operations, and the expected impact of the Kuncheng Share Exchange on the parties’
individual and combined financial performance. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations
of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipates,”
“believes,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,”
“may,” “might,” “plans,” “possible,” “potential,” “predicts,”
“projects,” “seeks,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions,
or the negatives of such terms, may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement
is not forward-looking.
The
forward-looking statements contained in this report are based on current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments
and the potential effects on the parties and the transaction. There can be no assurance that future developments actually affecting
us will be those anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond
the parties’ control) or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from
those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those risk factors set forth in
this report under the sections entitled “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations,” and “Business.”
Should
one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of the parties’ assumptions prove incorrect, actual
results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to
update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as
may be required under applicable securities laws.
ADDITIONAL
DISCLOSURE
For
additional information that would be required if the Company were filing a general form for registration of securities on Form
10, see Item 2.02 for “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,”
and Item 3.02 for a description of the Company’s securities post-Kuncheng Share Exchange and related discussion of market
price, all incorporated by reference herein. Required disclosure regarding the impact of the Kuncheng Share Exchange on the Company’s
directors, executive officers, control persons and related compensation and beneficial ownership issues are addressed in Item
5.02, incorporated by reference herein. Attention is also directed to Item 9.01, which provides the audited financial statements
of Kuncheng as of June 30, 2017 and for the period from June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.