Item 2. Code of Ethics.
(a) |
As of October 31, 2024, abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (the “Fund” or the “Registrant”) had adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the Registrant or a third party (the “Code of Ethics”). |
(c) |
There have been no amendments, during the period covered by this report, to a provision of the Code of Ethics. |
(d) |
During the period covered by this report, there were no waivers to the provisions of the Code of Ethics. |
(f) |
A copy of the Code of Ethics has been filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. |
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Registrant's Board of Trustees has determined
that John Sievwright, a member of the Board of Trustees’ Audit Committee, possesses the attributes, and has acquired such attributes
through means identified in instruction 2 of Item 3 to Form N-CSR to qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,”
and has designated Mr. Sievwright as the Audit Committee’s financial expert. Mr. Sievwright is considered to be an “independent”
trustee, as such term is defined in paragraph (a)(2) of Item 3 to Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) –
(d) Below is a table reflecting the fee information requested in Items 4(a) through (d):
Fiscal Year
Ended |
(a)
Audit Fees1 |
(b)
Audit-Related Fees2 |
(c)
Tax Fees3 |
(d)
All Other Fees4 |
October 31, 2024 |
$122,900 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Percentage approved pursuant to pre-approval exception5 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
October 31, 2023 |
$129,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Percentage approved pursuant to pre-approval exception5 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
1
“Audit Fees” are the aggregate fees billed for professional services for the audit of the Fund’s annual financial statements
and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
2
“Audit Related Fees” are the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance
of the audit or review of financial statements that are not reported under “Audit Fees”. These fees include offerings related
to the Fund’s common shares.
3
“Tax Fees” are the aggregate fees billed for professional services for tax advice, tax compliance, and tax planning. These
fees include: federal and state income tax returns, review of excise tax distribution calculations and federal excise tax return.
4
“All Other Fees” are the aggregate fees billed for products and services other than “Audit Fees”, “Audit-Related
Fees” and “Tax Fees”.
5
Pre-approval exception under Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X. The pre-approval exception for services provided directly to the Fund waives
the pre-approval requirement for services other than audit, review or attest services if: (A) the aggregate amount of all such services
provided constitutes no more than 5% of the total amount of revenues paid by the Fund to its accountant during the fiscal year in which
the services are provided; (B) the Fund did not recognize the services as non-audit services at the time of the engagement; and (C) the
services are promptly brought to the Audit Committee’s attention, and the Committee (or its delegate) approves the services before
the audit is completed.
(e)(1) |
The Registrant’s
Audit Committee (the “Committee”) has adopted a Charter that provides that the Committee shall annually select, retain
or terminate, and recommend to the Independent Trustees for their ratification, the selection, retention or termination, the
Registrant’s independent auditor and, in connection therewith, to evaluate the terms of the engagement (including compensation
of the independent auditor) and the qualifications and independence of the independent auditor, including whether the independent
auditor provides any consulting, auditing or tax services to the Registrant’s investment adviser (the “Adviser”)
or any sub-adviser, and to receive the independent auditor’s specific representations as to their independence, delineating
all relationships that may affect the independent auditor’s independence, including the disclosures required by PCAOB
Rule 3526 or any other applicable auditing standard. PCAOB Rule 3526 requires that, at least annually, the auditor:
(1) disclose to the Committee in writing all relationships between the auditor and its related entities and the Registrant and
its related entities that in the auditor’s professional judgment may reasonably be thought to bear on independence;
(2) confirm in the letter that, in its professional judgment, it is independent of the Registrant within the meaning of the
Securities Acts administered by the SEC; and (3) discuss the auditor’s independence with the audit committee. The
Committee is responsible for actively engaging in a dialogue with the independent auditor with respect to any disclosed
relationships or services that may impact the objectivity and independence of the independent auditor and for taking, or
recommending that the full Board take, appropriate action to oversee the independence of the independent auditor. The Committee
Charter also provides that the Committee shall review in advance, and consider approval of, any and all proposals by Management or
the Adviser that the Registrant, the Adviser or their affiliated persons, employ the independent auditor to render
“permissible non-audit services” to the Registrant and to consider whether such services are consistent with the
independent auditor’s independence. “Permissible non-audit services” include any professional services, including
tax services, provided to the Registrant by the independent auditor, other than those provided to the Registrant in connection with
an audit or a review of the financial statements of the Registrant. Permissible non-audit services may not include:
(i) bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the Registrant;
(ii) financial information systems design and implementation; (iii) appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or
contribution-in-kind reports; (iv) actuarial services; (v) internal audit outsourcing services; (vi) management
functions or human resources; (vii) broker or dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services; (viii) legal
services and expert services unrelated to the audit; and (ix) any other service the PCAOB determines, by regulation, is
impermissible. Pre-approval by the Committee of any permissible non-audit services is not required so long as:
(i) the aggregate amount of all such permissible non-audit services provided to the Registrant constitutes not more than 5% of
the total amount of revenues paid by the Registrant to its auditor during the fiscal year in which the permissible non-audit
services are provided; (ii) the permissible non-audit services were not recognized by the Registrant at the time of the
engagement to be non-audit services; and (iii) such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Committee and
approved by the Committee or its Delegate(s) prior to the completion of the audit. The Committee may delegate to one or more of
its members (“Delegates”) authority to pre-approve permissible non-audit services to be provided to the Registrant. Any
pre-approval determination of a Delegate shall be presented to the full Committee at its next meeting. Any pre-approval
determination of a Delegate shall be presented to the full Committee at its next meeting. Pursuant to this authority, the
Registrant’s Committee delegates to the Committee Chair, subject to subsequent ratification by the full Committee, up to a
maximum amount of $25,000, which includes any professional services, including tax services, provided to the Registrant by its
independent registered public accounting firm other than those provided to the Registrant in connection with an audit or a review of
the financial statements of the Registrant. The Committee shall communicate any pre-approval made by it or a Delegate to
the Adviser, who will ensure that the appropriate disclosure is made in the Registrant’s periodic reports required by
Section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), and other documents as required under the
federal securities laws. |
(e)(2) |
None of the services described in each of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item involved a waiver of the pre-approval requirement by the Audit Committee pursuant to Rule 2-01 (c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X. |
The following table shows the amount of fees that KPMG LLP
billed during the Fund’s last two fiscal years for non-audit services to the Registrant, and to the Adviser, and any entity controlling,
controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund (“Affiliated Fund Service Provider”):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
Total Non-Audit Fees
Billed to Fund |
|
|
Total Non-Audit Fees
billed to Adviser and
Affiliated Fund Service
Providers (engagements
related directly to the
operations and financial
reporting of the Fund) |
|
|
Total Non-Audit Fees
billed to Adviser and
Affiliated Fund Service
Providers (all other
engagements) |
|
|
Total |
|
October 31, 2024 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
629,124 |
|
|
$ |
629,124 |
|
October 31, 2023 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,171,994 |
|
|
$ |
1,171,994 |
|
“Non-Audit Fees billed to Fund” for both fiscal years represent
“Tax Fees” and “All Other Fees” billed to Fund in their respective amounts from the previous table.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
(a) |
The Registrant has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(58)(A)). |
As of the fiscal year ended October 31,
2024, the Audit Committee members were:
Nancy Yao
P. Gerald Malone
John Sievwright
Randolph Takian
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Included as part of the Report to Stockholders
filed under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for Open-End
Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants for Open-End
Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Proxy Disclosures for Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Remuneration Paid to Directors, Officers, and Others of
Open-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Advisory
Contract.
Included as part of the Report to Stockholders
filed under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 12. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for
Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Pursuant to the Registrant's Proxy Voting Policy
and Procedures, the Registrant has delegated responsibility for its proxy voting to its Adviser, provided that the Registrant's Board
of Trustees has the opportunity to periodically review the Adviser's proxy voting policies and material amendments thereto.
The proxy voting policies of the Registrant are
included herewith as Exhibit (c) and policies of the Adviser are included as Exhibit (d).
Item 13. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment
Companies.
(a)(1) PORTFOLIO MANAGER BIOGRAPHIES
The Fund is managed by abrdn’s
Global High Yield team which also draws on the expertise of abrdn’s Global Loans, US High Yield and European High Yield teams.
As of the date of filing this report, the members of the team having the most significant responsibility for day-to-day management
of the Fund are listed below.
Individual &
Position |
Past Business Experience |
Served on Fund Since |
Steven Logan
Head of European High Yield and Global Loans |
Steven Logan is Head of European High Yield and Global Loans and a portfolio manager on the abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund and Global High Yield strategies at abrdn. Steven has analysed and managed credit investments for over 30 years having previously worked at The Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co. Ltd, Standard Life Investments, Scottish Widows Investment Partnership, Aberdeen Asset Management and PGIM Fixed Income. Steven has a BA (Hons) in Banking and Finance from Birmingham City University. |
2024 (and previously, from 2017 to 2020) |
Matthew Kence
Investment Director – US High Yield and Global High Yield |
Matthew Kence is an Investment Director and is a Portfolio Manager on the abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund and the Global High Yield strategies at abrdn. He is also a member of the North American Fixed Income Leadership team. Matt joined the company in 2010 from Gannet Welsh & Kotler where he was a Vice President, Credit. Previously, Matt also worked for MFS Investment Management as a high yield analyst. Matt graduated with a BS Mechanical Engineering from Ohio University and received his MBA from the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley. |
2017 |
George Westervelt
Head of Global High Yield and Head of US High Yield Research |
George Westervelt is Head of Global High Yield and Head of US High Yield Research. George is one of the Portfolio Managers on the team that manages the Global High Yield strategies and is also a member of the North American Fixed Income Leadership team. He joined abrdn in 2009 as a Credit Analyst and joined the portfolio management group in 2011. Prior to joining abrdn, George worked at MFS Investment Management in Boston and Citigroup in New York. He earned a BA in English from the University of Vermont and is a CFA Charterholder. |
2022 |
(a)(2) OTHER ACCOUNTS
MANAGED BY PORTFOLIO MANAGERS.
The following chart summarizes information regarding
other accounts for which each portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities. Accounts are grouped into the following three
categories: (1) registered investment companies; (2) other pooled investment vehicles; and (3) other accounts. To the extent
that any of these accounts pay advisory fees that are based on account performance (“performance-based fees”), information
on those accounts is provided separately. The figures in the chart below for the category of “registered investment companies”
include the Fund. The “Other Accounts Managed” represents the accounts managed by the teams of which the portfolio manager
is a member. The information in the table below is as of October 31, 2024.
Name of Portfolio Manager | |
Type of Accounts | |
Other Accounts Managed | |
Total Assets ($M) | | |
Number of Accounts Managed for Which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance | | |
Total Assets for Which Advisory Fee is Based on Performance ($M) | |
Steven Logan1 | |
Registered Investment Companies | |
1 | |
$ | 1,108.36 | | |
| 0 | | |
$ | 0 | |
| |
Pooled Investment Vehicles | |
4 | |
$ | 814.93 | | |
| 0 | | |
$ | 0 | |
| |
Other Accounts | |
2 | |
$ | 198.84 | | |
| 0 | | |
$ | 0 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Matthew Kence2 | |
Registered Investment Companies | |
2 | |
$ | 1,191.28 | | |
| 0 | | |
$ | 0 | |
| |
Pooled Investment Vehicles | |
6 | |
$ | 1,807.93 | | |
| 0 | | |
$ | 0 | |
| |
Other Accounts | |
3 | |
$ | 560.60 | | |
| 0 | | |
$ | 0 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
George
Westervelt3 | |
Registered Investment Companies | |
3 | |
$ | 1,262.23 | | |
| 0 | | |
$ | 0 | |
| |
Pooled Investment Vehicles | |
6 | |
$ | 1,807.93 | | |
| 0 | | |
$ | 0 | |
| |
Other Accounts | |
3 | |
$ | 560.60 | | |
| 0 | | |
$ | 0 | |
1 Includes
accounts managed by the Euro High Yield and Global Loans teams, of which the portfolio manager is a member.
2 Includes
accounts managed by the Global High Yield, US Global Credit, Euro High Yield and Global Loans teams, of which the portfolio manager is
a member.
3 Includes
the abrdn Global Income Fund, Inc., a Registered Investment Company for which George Westervelt also serves as portfolio manager,
as well as accounts managed by the Global High Yield, US Global Credit, Euro High Yield and Global Loans teams, of which the portfolio
manager is a member.
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Adviser and its affiliates (collectively referred
to herein as “abrdn”) serve as investment advisers for multiple clients, including the Registrant and other investment companies
registered under the 1940 Act and private funds (such clients are also referred to below as “accounts”). The portfolio managers’
management of “other accounts” may give rise to potential conflicts of interest in connection with their management of the
Registrant’s investments, on the one hand, and the investments of the other accounts, on the other. The other accounts may have
the same investment objective as the Registrant. Therefore, a potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the identical investment
objectives, whereby the portfolio manager could favor one account over another. However, the Adviser believes that these risks are mitigated
by the fact that: (i) accounts with like investment strategies managed by a particular portfolio manager are generally managed in
a similar fashion, subject to exceptions to account for particular investment restrictions or policies applicable only to certain accounts,
differences in cash flows and account sizes, and similar factors; and (ii) portfolio manager personal trading is monitored to avoid
potential conflicts. In addition, the Adviser has adopted trade allocation procedures that require equitable allocation of trade orders
for a particular security among participating accounts.
In some cases, another account managed by the
same portfolio manager may compensate abrdn based on the performance-based fees with qualified clients. The existence of such a performance-based
fee may create additional conflicts of interest for the portfolio manager in the allocation of management time, resources and investment
opportunities.
Another potential conflict could include instances
in which securities considered as investments for the Registrant also may be appropriate for other investment accounts managed by the
Adviser or its affiliates. Whenever decisions are made to buy or sell securities for the Registrant and one or more of the other accounts
simultaneously, the Adviser may aggregate the purchases and sales of the securities and will allocate the securities transactions in a
manner that it believes to be equitable under the circumstances. As a result of the allocations, there may be instances where the Registrant
will not participate in a transaction that is allocated among other accounts. While these aggregation and allocation policies could have
a detrimental effect on the price or amount of the securities available to the Registrant from time to time, it is the opinion of the
Adviser that the benefits from the policies outweigh any disadvantage that may arise from exposure to simultaneous transactions. The Registrant
has adopted policies that are designed to eliminate or minimize conflicts of interest, although there is no guarantee that procedures
adopted under such policies will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.
With respect to non-discretionary model delivery
accounts (including UMA accounts) and discretionary SMA accounts, abrdn Inc. will utilize a third party service provider to deliver model
portfolio recommendations and model changes to the Sponsors. abrdn Inc. seeks to treat clients fairly and equitably over time, by delivering
model changes to our service provider and investment instructions for our other discretionary accounts to our trading desk, simultaneously
or approximately at the same time. The service provider will then deliver the model changes to each Sponsor on a when-traded, randomized
full rotation schedule. All Sponsors will be included in the rotation schedule, including SMA and UMA.
UMA Sponsors will be responsible for determining
how and whether to implement the model portfolio or model changes and implementation of any client specific investment restrictions. The
Sponsors are solely responsible for determining the suitability of the model portfolio for each model delivery client, executing trades
and seeking best execution for such clients.
As it relates to SMA accounts, abrdn Inc. will
be responsible for managing the account on the basis of each client’s financial situation and objectives, the day to day investment
decisions, best execution, accepting or rejecting client specific investment restrictions and performance. The SMA Sponsors will collect
suitability information and will provide a summary questionnaire for our review and approval or rejection. For dual contract SMAs, abrdn
Inc. will collect a suitability assessment from the client, along with the Sponsor suitability assessment. Our third party service provider
will monitor client specific investment restrictions on a day to day basis. For SMA accounts, model trades will be traded by the Sponsor
or may be executed through a “step-out transaction,”- or traded away- from the client’s Sponsor if doing so is consistent
with abrdn’s obligation to obtain best execution. When placing trades through Sponsor Firms (instead of stepping them out), we will
generally aggregate orders where it is possible and in the client’s best interests. In the event we are not comfortable that a Sponsor
can obtain best execution for a specific security and trading away is infeasible, we may exclude the security from the model.
Trading costs are not covered by the Wrap Program
fee and may result in additional costs to the client. In some instances, step-out trades are executed without any additional commission,
mark-up, or mark-down, but in many instances, the executing broker-dealer may impose a commission or a mark-up or mark-down on the trade.
Typically, the executing broker will embed the added costs into the price of the trade execution, making it difficult to determine and
disclose the exact added cost to clients. In this instance, these additional trading costs will be reflected in the price received for
the security, not as a separate commission, on trade confirmations or on account statements. In determining best execution for SMA accounts,
abrdn Inc. takes into consideration that the client will not pay additional trading costs or commission if executing with the Sponsor.
While UMA accounts are invested in the same strategies
as and may perform similarly to SMA accounts, there are expected to be performance differences between them. There will be performance
dispersions between UMAs and other types of accounts because abrdn does not have discretion over trading and there may be client specific
restrictions for SMA accounts.
abrdn may have already commenced trading for its
discretionary client accounts before the model delivery accounts have executed abrdn's recommendations. In this event, trades placed by
the model delivery clients may be subject to price movements, particularly with large orders or where securities are thinly traded, that
may result in model delivery clients receiving less favorable prices than our discretionary clients. abrdn has no discretion over transactions
executed by model delivery clients and is unable to control the market impact of those transactions.
Timing delays or other operational factors associated
with the implementation of trades may result in non-discretionary and model delivery clients receiving materially different prices relative
to other client accounts. In addition, the constitution and weights of stocks within model portfolios may not always be exactly aligned
with similar discretionary accounts. This may create performance dispersions within accounts with the same or similar investment mandate.
(a)(3)
DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION STRUCTURE
abrdn’s remuneration policies are designed
to support its business strategy as a leading international asset manager. The objective is to attract, retain and reward talented
individuals for the delivery of sustained, superior returns for abrdn’s clients and shareholders. abrdn operates in a highly
competitive international employment market, and aims to maintain its strong track record of success in developing and retaining talent.
abrdn’s policy is to recognize corporate
and individual achievements each year through an appropriate annual bonus scheme. The bonus is a single, fully discretionary variable
pay award. The aggregate value of awards in any year is dependent on the group’s overall performance and profitability. Consideration
is also given to the levels of bonuses paid in the market. Individual awards, which are payable to all members of staff, are determined
by a rigorous assessment of achievement against defined objectives.
The variable pay award is composed of a mixture
of cash and a deferred award, the portion of which varies based on the size of the award. Deferred awards are by default abrdn plc
shares, with an option to put up to 50% of the deferred award into funds managed by abrdn. Overall compensation packages are designed
to be competitive relative to the investment management industry. The information below is as of October 31, 2024.
Base Salary
abrdn’s policy is to pay a fair salary commensurate
with the individual’s role, responsibilities and experience, and having regard to the market rates being offered for similar roles
in the asset management sector and other comparable companies. Any increase is generally to reflect inflation and is applied in a manner
consistent with other abrdn employees; any other increases must be justified by reference to promotion or changes in responsibilities.
Annual Bonus
The Remuneration Committee determines the key performance
indicators that will be applied in considering the overall size of the bonus pool. In line with practices amongst other asset management
companies, individual bonuses are not subject to an absolute cap. However, the aggregate size of the bonus pool is dependent on
the group’s overall performance and profitability. Consideration is also given to the levels of bonuses paid in the market.
Individual awards are determined by a rigorous assessment of achievement against defined objectives, and are reviewed and approved by
the Remuneration Committee.
abrdn has a deferral policy which is intended to
assist in the retention of talent and to create additional alignment of executives’ interests with abrdn’s sustained performance
and, in respect of the deferral into funds managed by abrdn, to align the interest of portfolio managers with our clients.
Staff performance is reviewed formally at least
once a year. The review process evaluates the various aspects that the individual has contributed to abrdn, and specifically, in the case
of portfolio managers, to the relevant investment team. Discretionary bonuses are based on client service, asset growth and the performance
of the respective portfolio manager. Overall participation in team meetings, generation of original research ideas and contribution to
presenting the team externally are also evaluated.
In the calculation of a portfolio management team’s
bonus, abrdn takes into consideration investment matters (which include the performance of funds, adherence to the company investment
process, and quality of company meetings) as well as more subjective issues such as team participation and effectiveness at client presentations
through key performance indicator scorecards. To the extent performance is factored in, such performance is not judged against any
specific benchmark and is evaluated over the period of a year - January to December. The pre- or after-tax performance of an individual
account is not considered in the determination of a portfolio manager’s discretionary bonus; rather the review process evaluates
the overall performance of the team for all of the accounts the team manages.
Portfolio manager performance on investment matters
is judged over all of the accounts the portfolio manager contributes to and is documented in the appraisal process. A combination
of the team’s and individual’s performance is considered and evaluated.
Although performance is not a substantial portion
of a portfolio manager’s compensation, abrdn also recognizes that fund performance can often be driven by factors outside one’s
control, such as (irrational) markets, and as such pays attention to the effort by portfolio managers to ensure integrity of our core
process by sticking to disciplines and processes set, regardless of momentum and ‘hot’ themes. Short-terming is thus
discouraged and trading-oriented managers will thus find it difficult to thrive in the abrdn environment. Additionally, if any of
the aforementioned undue risks were to be taken by a portfolio manager, such trend would be identified via abrdn’s dynamic compliance
monitoring system.
In rendering investment
management services, the Adviser may use the resources of additional investment adviser subsidiaries of abrdn plc. These affiliates
have entered into a memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) pursuant to which investment professionals from each affiliate
may render portfolio management, research or trading services to abrdn clients. Each investment professional who renders portfolio
management, research or trading services under a MOU or personnel sharing arrangement (“Participating Affiliate”) must
comply with the provisions of the Advisers Act of 1940, the 1940 Act, the Securities Act of 1933, the Exchange Act, and the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and the laws of states or countries in which the Adviser does business or has clients. No
remuneration is paid by the Fund with respect to the MOU/personnel sharing arrangements.
(a)(4)
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the
Registrant Beneficially Owned by the Portfolio
Manager as of October 31, 2024 |
|
Steven Logan |
|
None |
Matthew Kence |
|
None |
George Westervelt |
|
None |
(b) Not applicable.
Item 14. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management
Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Period | |
(a) Total No. of Shares Purchased (1) | | |
(b) Average Price Paid per Share | | |
(c) Total No. of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | |
(d) Maximum No. of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | |
Month #1 (Nov. 1, 2023 – Nov. 30, 2023) | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,307,407 | |
Month #2 (Dec. 1, 2023– Dec. 31, 2023) | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,307,407 | |
Month #3 (Jan. 1, 2024 – Jan. 31, 2024) | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,307,407 | |
Month #4 (Feb. 1, 2024 – Feb. 29, 2024) | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,307,407 | |
Month #5 (Mar. 1, 2024 – Mar. 31, 2024) | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,307,407 | |
Month #6 (Apr. 1, 2024 – Apr. 30, 2024) | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,307,407 | |
Month #7 (May 1, 2024 – May 31, 2024) | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,307,407 | |
Month #8 (June 1, 2024 – June 30, 2024) | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,307,407 | |
Month #9 (Jul. 1, 2024 – Jul. 31, 2024) | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,307,407 | |
Month #10 (Aug. 1, 2024 – Aug. 31, 2024) | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,307,407 | |
Month #11 (Sep. 1, 2024– Sep. 30, 2024) | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,307,407 | |
Month #12 (Oct. 1, 2024 – Oct. 31, 2024) | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| 1,307,407 | |
Total | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
|
(1) |
On June 12, 2018, the Fund’s Board approved an open market share repurchase program (the “Program”). Under the terms of the Program, the Fund is permitted to repurchase, in the open market, up to 10% of its outstanding shares of common stock as of June 12, 2018. The Program allows the Fund to purchase, in the open market, its outstanding common shares, with the amount and timing of any repurchase determined at the discretion of the Fund's investment adviser. Such purchases may be made opportunistically at certain discounts to NAV per share in the reasonable judgment of management based on historical discount levels and current market conditions. On a quarterly basis, the Fund’s Board will receive information on any transactions made pursuant to this Program during the prior quarter. If shares are repurchased, the Fund reports repurchase activity on the Fund's website on a monthly basis. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2024, the Fund did not repurchase any shares through the Program. |
Item 15. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
During the period ended October 31, 2024, there were no material
changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant’s Board of Trustees.
Item 16. Controls and Procedures.
|
(a) |
The Registrant’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”) (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c)) are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of the report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a3(b)) and Rule 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d15(b)). |
|
(b) |
There were no changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d))) that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 17. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End
Management Investment Companies
Not applicable.
Item 18. Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation.
Not applicable.
Item 19. Exhibits.
Pursuant to Section 406
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has adopted rules requiring annual
disclosure of an investment company’s code of ethics applicable to its principal executive, principal financial and principal accounting
officers. The Funds have adopted this Code of Ethics (the “Code”) pursuant to these rules. The Code applies to the series
(each a “Fund”). The Code specifically applies to each Fund’s President/Principal Executive Officer and Treasurer/Principal
Financial Officer (“Covered Officers”) for the purpose of promoting:
The Covered Officers are integral
to the Funds’ goal of creating a culture of high ethical standards and commitment to compliance. In their roles, the Covered Officers
will refrain from engaging in any activity that may compromise their professional ethics or otherwise prejudice their ability to carry
out their duties to the Funds.’ They will act in good faith, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material
facts or allowing their independent judgment to be subordinated.
Certain conflicts of interest
arise out of the relationship between Covered Officers and each Fund and already are subject to conflict of interest provisions in the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”).
For example, Covered Officers may not individually engage in certain transactions (such as the purchase or sale of securities or other
property) with the Funds because of their status as “affiliated persons” of the Funds. Each Fund’s Adviser and Sub-adviser
(the “adviser(s)”) have adopted and implemented respective compliance programs and procedures that are designed to prevent,
or identify and correct, violations of these provisions. This Code does not, and is not intended to repeat or replace these programs and
procedures, and such conflicts fall outside of the parameters of this Code. Each Covered Officer should be sensitive to situations that
may give rise to actual as well as apparent conflicts of interest and should encourage his or her colleagues who provide service to the
Funds, whether directly or indirectly, to do the same.
Although typically not presenting
an opportunity for improper personal benefit, conflicts arise from, or as a result of, the contractual relationship between each Fund
and the investment adviser (and distributor to the Aberdeen open-end funds) of which the Covered Officers are also officers or employees.
As a result, this Code recognizes that the Covered Officers will, in the normal course of their duties (whether formally for the Fund
or the investment adviser or for both), be involved in establishing policies and implementing decisions that will have different effects
on the investment adviser, distributor and the Funds. The participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent in the
contractual relationship between the Funds and the Adviser and is consistent with the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties
as officers of each Fund. Thus, if performed in conformity with the provisions of the 1940 Act and the Advisers Act, such activities will
be deemed to have been handled ethically. In addition, it is recognized by the Funds’ Board that the Covered Officers may also be
officers or employees of the Funds.
Other conflicts of interest
are covered by this Code, even if such conflicts of interest are not subject to provisions in the 1940 Act and the Advisers Act. The overarching
principle is that the personal interest of a Covered Officer should not be placed improperly before the interest of the Funds. A defining
question is, “What is the long term interest of current shareholders?” The following list provides examples of conflicts of
interest under this Code, but Covered Officers should keep in mind that these examples are not exhaustive.
Any activity or relationship
that would present a conflict for a Covered Officer would likely also present a conflict for the Covered Officer if a member of the Covered
Officer’s family engages in such activity or has such a relationship. There are some conflict of interest situations that should
always be discussed with the Compliance Officer prior to their occurrence, or if foreseen, as soon as reasonably possible after discovery.
Examples of these include:
The Funds’ CCO is responsible
for applying this Code to specific situations in which questions are presented under it and has the authority to interpret this Code in
any particular situation. However, any approvals or Waivers sought by the President will be considered by the Funds’ Audit Committee.
The Funds will follow these
procedures in investigating and enforcing this Code.
The matters covered in the
Code are of the utmost importance to the Funds and their stockholders and are essential to each Fund’s ability to conduct its business
in accordance with its stated values. Each Covered Officer and each Executive Officer is expected to adhere to these rules (to the
extent applicable) in carrying out his or her duties for the Funds. The conduct of each Covered Officer and each Executive Officer can
reinforce an ethical atmosphere and positively influence the conduct of all officers, employees and agents of the Funds. A Fund will,
if appropriate, take action against any Covered Officer whose actions are found to violate the Code. Appropriate sanctions for violations
of the Code will depend on the materiality of the violation to the Fund.
Sanctions may include, among
other things, a requirement that the violator undergo training related to the violation, a letter or sanction or written censure by the
Board, the imposition of a monetary penalty, suspension of the violator as an officer of a Fund or termination of the employment of the
violator. If a Fund has suffered a loss because of violations of the Code, the Fund may pursue remedies against the individuals or entities
responsible.
This Code shall be the sole
code of ethics adopted by the Funds for the purposes of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and forms applicable
to registered investment companies thereunder. Insofar as other policies or procedures of the Funds, the Adviser, principal underwriter,
or other service providers govern or purport to govern the behavior or activities if the Covered Officers who are subject to this Code,
they are superseded by this Code to the extent that they overlap or conflict with the provisions of this Code. The Funds’ and Adviser’s
code of ethics under Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 are not part of this Code.
Any amendments to this Code
must be approved or ratified by a majority vote of the each Fund’s Board, including a majority of Independent Board members.
All reports and records prepared
or maintained pursuant to this Code will be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly. Except as otherwise
required by law or this Code, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the appropriate Board and its Counsel.
This Code is intended solely
for internal use by the Funds and does not constitute an admission, by or on behalf of the Funds, as to any fact, circumstance, or legal
conclusion. This Code is a statement of certain fundamental principles, policies, and procedures that govern the Covered Officers in the
conduct of each Fund’s business. It is not intended and does not create any rights in any employee, investor, supplier, creditor,
shareholder or any other person.
This is to certify that I have received a copy
of the Code of Ethics Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Code”) for the following Funds:
I have read and understand the Code. Moreover, I
agree to promptly report to the Chief Compliance Officer any violation or possible violation of this Code of which I become aware. I understand
that violation of the Code will be grounds for disciplinary action or dismissal.
Alan Goodson, Principal Executive Officer, and
Sharon Ferrari, Principal Financial Officer, of abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (the “Registrant”), each certify that:
This certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of Form N-CSR or as a separate disclosure document.
A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Registrant
and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Rules adopted by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)
require the Funds to disclose publicly its proxy voting policies and procedures, as well as its actual proxy votes. The SEC rules also
permit the Funds to delegate its proxy voting responsibilities to the Funds’ Investment Manager, Investment Adviser, and Sub-advisers
(collectively “the Advisers”). In connection with this ability to delegate proxy voting responsibilities, the SEC has adopted
rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, that require the Advisers to adopt and implement written proxy voting
policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that it votes proxies on behalf of its clients, when given such authority,
in the best interests of those clients.
Consistent with the SEC’s
requirements, the Funds have delegated responsibility for voting its proxy to the Funds’ Investment Manager, Investment Adviser
and Sub-advisers. The Advisers have adopted proxy voting policies and procedures to ensure the proper, and timely, voting of the proxies
on behalf of the Funds. Moreover, the Advisers will assist the Funds in the preparation of each Fund’s complete proxy voting record
on Form N-PX for the twelve-month period ended June 30, by no later than August 31 of each year.
Each Fund shall ensure that
its investment manager, investment adviser and sub-advisers are compliant with applicable rules and regulations. These rules and
regulations require, in part, that each Fund disclose how it votes each proxy. The rules and regulations also require that the Advisers
disclose that they have (1) adopted and implemented proxy voting policies; and (2) adopted procedures regarding how each portfolio
security is voted in relation to each Fund. The Adviser must disclose that the procedures are the following:
The Funds also shall disclose
to shareholders the policies and procedures that are used to determine how to vote proxies. The Funds include in the Funds’ statement
of additional information appropriate summary disclosure regarding the proxy voting policies and procedures of the Funds’ adviser
and sub-advisers, and any third party retained by the Funds’ investment adviser or sub-adviser to determine how to vote proxies.
In addition, as required by the financial statements’ requirements of Form N-1A and N-2, the Funds’ financial statements
must include a statement that a description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities
is available, without charge: (i) upon request, by calling a specified toll-free (or collect) telephone number; or (ii) on the
Funds’ website; and (iii) on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.
The Funds also shall file
with the SEC, on an annual basis, the complete proxy voting record of each Fund on Form N-PX for the twelve-month period ending June 30th,
by no later than August 31st of each year, which Report on Form N-PX shall be executed by the principal executive
officer of the each Fund. Each Fund’s proxy voting record on the Form N-PX Report shall be made available by each Fund, without
charge, upon request, by calling specified toll-free (or collect) telephone number (but is not available on the Funds’ website).
If a Fund receives a telephonic request for a proxy voting record, the Fund shall send the requested information disclosed in the Fund’s
most-recently filed Report on Form N-PX within three (3) business days of the receipt of the request for this information, by
first-class mail or other means designed to ensure equally prompt delivery.
Sub-advisers to the Funds
must have procedures and internal controls to ensure compliance with proxy voting regulations. Specifically, the sub-advisers must have
procedures for the reporting of proxy voting, and communicating changes in proxy voting policies to the Funds. Prior to Board approval
of new advisers, the Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) reviews the proxy voting policies and procedures of the sub-adviser.
The CCO ensures that any inadequate procedures or controls of a sub-adviser are reported to the Board and must be corrected in a timely
manner.
Where clients appoint abrdn Inc. to vote proxies on their behalf, policies
have been established to vote these proxies in the best interests of our clients.
We employ ISS as a service provider to facilitate electronic voting.
We require ISS to provide recommendations based on our own set of parameters tailored to abrdn’s assessment and approach, but remain
conscious that all voting decisions are our own on behalf of our clients. We consider ISS’s recommendations and those based on our
custom parameters as input to our voting decisions. We make use of the ISS standard research and recommendations and those based on our
own custom policy as input to our voting decisions. Where our analysts make a voting decision that is different from the recommendations
based on our custom policy they will provide a rationale for such a decisions which will be made publicly available in our voting disclosures.
In order to make proxy voting decisions, an abrdn analyst assesses
the resolutions at general meetings in our active investment portfolios. This analysis will be based on our knowledge of the company,
but will also make use of the custom and standard recommendations provided by ISS as described above. The product of this analysis will
be a final voting decision instructed through ISS and applied to all funds for which abrdn have been appointed to vote. For funds managed
by a sub-adviser, we may delegate to the sub-adviser the authority to vote proxies; however, the sub-adviser will be required to either
follow our policies and procedures or to demonstrate that their policies and procedures are consistent with ours, or otherwise implemented
in the best interest of clients.
There may be certain circumstances where abrdn Inc. may take a more
limited role in voting proxies. We will not vote proxies for client accounts in which the client contract specifies that abrdn Inc. will
not vote. We may abstain from voting a client proxy if the voting is uneconomic or otherwise not in clients’ best interests. For
companies held only in passively managed portfolios, abrdn Inc. custom recommendations provided by ISS will be used to automatically apply
our voting approach; we have scope to intervene to test that this delivers appropriate results, and will on occasions intrude to apply
a vote more fully in clients’ best interests. If voting securities are part of a securities lending program, we may be unable to
vote while the securities are on loan. However, we have the ability to recall shares on loan or to restrict lending when required, in
order to ensure all shares have voted. In addition, certain jurisdictions may impose share-blocking restrictions at various times which
may prevent abrdn Inc. from exercising our voting authority.
We recognize that there may be situations in which we vote at a company
meeting where we encounter a conflict of interest. Such situations include:
We have adopted procedures within our proxy voting process to identify
where a conflict exists. These procedures are designed to ensure that our voting decisions are based on our client’s best interests
and are not impacted by any conflict.
The implementation of this policy, along with conflicts of interest,
will be reviewed periodically by the Active Ownership team. abrdn’s Global ESG Principles & Voting Policies are published
on our website.
Clients may obtain a free copy of abrdn Inc.’s proxy voting policies
and procedures and/or proxy voting records for their account by contacting us at (215) 405-5700. abrdn publishes ESG Principles &
Voting Policies, which describe our approach to investment analysis, shareholder engagement and proxy voting across companies worldwide.
There are published on our website.
Clients that have not granted abrdn Inc. voting authority over securities
held in their accounts will receive their proxies in accordance with the arrangements they have made with their service providers.
Active Ownership and Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG)
considerations are a driver of our investment process, our investment activity, our client journey and our corporate influence.
Through engagement with the companies in which we invest, and by exercising
votes on behalf of our clients, we seek to improve the financial resilience and performance of our clients’ investments. Where we
believe change is needed, we endeavour to catalyse this through our stewardship capabilities.
As global investors, we are particularly aware that ESG structures
and frameworks vary across regions. Furthermore, what we expect of the companies in which we invest varies between different stages of
business development and the underlying history and nature of the company in question. We seek to understand each company’s individual
circumstances and so evaluate how it can best be governed and overseen. As such, we strive to apply the principles and policies set out
on these pages in response to the needs of that individual company at that particular time. Our heritage as a predominantly active
fund manager helps drive this bespoke approach to understanding good governance and risk management.
We have a clear perception of what we consider to be best practice
globally – as set out in this document. However we will reflect the nature of the business, our close understanding of individual
companies and regional considerations, where appropriate, in our approach to applying these policies, which are not exhaustive.
This document has received approval from the Head of Public Markets
and the Investment Vector’s Chief Sustainability Officer following consultation with various internal stakeholders.
We seek to integrate and appraise environmental, social and governance
factors in our investment process. Our aim is to generate the best long-term outcomes for our clients and we will actively take
steps as stewards and owners to protect and enhance the value of our clients’ assets.
Stewardship is a reflection of this bespoke approach to good governance
and risk management. We seek to understand each company’s specific approach to governance, how value is created through business
success and how investors’ interests are protected through the management of risks that materially impact business success.
This requires us to play our part in the governance process by being active stewards of companies, involved in dialogue with management
and non-executive directors where appropriate, understanding the material risks and opportunities – including those relating
to environmental and social factors and helping to shape the future success of the business.
abrdn is committed to exercising responsible ownership with a conviction
that companies adopting improving practices in corporate governance and risk management will be more successful in their core activities
and deliver enhanced returns to shareholders. As owners of companies, the process of stewardship is a natural part of our investment
approach as we seek to benefit from their long-term success on our clients’ behalf.
It is a central tenet of our active investment approach that we strive
to meet with the management and directors of our investee companies on a regular basis. The discussions we have cover a wide range
of topics, including: strategic, operational, and ESG issues and consider the long-term drivers of value. Engagement with companies
on ESG risks and opportunities is a fundamental part of our investment process. It is a process by which we can discuss how a company
identifies, prioritises and mitigates its key risks and optimises its most significant opportunities. As such, we regard
engagement as:
Proxy voting is an integral part of our active stewardship approach
and we seek to exercise voting rights in a manner in line with our clients’ best interests. We seek to ensure that voting
reflects our understanding of the companies in which we invest on behalf of our clients. We believe that voting is a vital mechanism
for holding boards and management teams to account, and is an important tool for escalation and shareholder action.
This
document includes our process and overarching policy guidelines which we apply when voting at general meetings. These policies
are not exhaustive and we evaluate our voting on a case by case basis. As a global investment firm we recognise the importance
of adopting a regional approach, taking into account differing and developing market practices. Where a policy is specific to one
region this is denoted. We endeavour to engage with companies regarding our voting decisions to maintain a dialogue on matters
of concern.
In line with our active ownership approach, we review the majority
of general meeting agendas convened by companies which are held in our active equity portfolios. Analysis is undertaken by a member
of our regional investment teams or our Active Ownership team and votes instructed following consideration of our policies, our
views of the company and our investment insights. To enhance our analysis we may engage with a company prior to voting to understand
additional context and explanations, particularly where there is deviation from what we believe to be best practice.
To
supplement our own analysis we make use of the benchmark research and recommendations provided by ISS, a provider of proxy voting
services. In the UK we also make use of the Investment Association’s (IA) Institutional Voting Information Service. We have
implemented regional voting policy guidelines with ISS which ISS applies to all meetings in order to produce customised vote recommendations.
These custom recommendations help identify resolutions which deviate from our expectations. They are also used to determine votes
where a company is held only in passive funds. Within our custom policies, however, we do specify numerous resolutions which should
be referred to us for active review. For example we will analyse all proposals marked by ISS as environmental or social proposals.
While it is most common for us to vote in line with a board’s voting recommendation we will vote our clients’ shares
against resolutions which are not consistent with their best interests. We may also vote against resolutions which conflict
with local governance guidelines, such as the IA in the UK. Although we seek to vote either in favour or against a resolution we
do make use of an abstain vote where this is considered appropriate. For example we may use an abstention to acknowledge some improvement,
but as a means to reserve our position in expectation that further improvement is needed before we can vote in favour. Where we
vote against a resolution we endeavour to inform companies of our rationale.
In exceptional circumstances we may attend
and speak at a shareholder meeting to reinforce our views to the company’s board.
We endeavour to vote all shares
for which we have voting authority. We may not vote when there are obstacles to do so, for example those impacting liquidity, such
as share- blocking, or where there is a significant conflict of interest. We use the voting platform of ISS to instruct our votes.
Where we lend stock on behalf of clients, and subject to the terms of client agreements, we hold the right to recall shares where
it is in clients’ interests and we take the view that it will impact the final vote to maintain full voting weight on a particular
meeting or resolution.
Our votes are disclosed publicly on our website one day after a general meeting has taken place.
We invest in companies to create the best outcome for our clients.
Companies must be clear about the drivers of their business success and their strategy for maintaining and enhancing it. Investment
is a forward-looking process; we seek to understand the opportunity for a business and its scope for future value-creation over
the long term. In order to do this, we need clarity on past business delivery and its drivers, and on the effective track record
of management; we require honest and open reporting to build confidence in that track record. We seek confidence that companies
and their management can maintain their competitive positioning and operational performance and subsequently enhance returns
for investors. A clear strategy and clarity about the drivers of operational success provides the lens through which we will consider
most corporate issues, not least assessing performance and risk management.
We believe effective board governance promotes the long-term success
and value creation of the company. The board should be responsible for establishing the company’s purpose and strategy, overseeing
management in their implementation of strategy and performance against objectives. The board should ensure a strong framework of
control and risk oversight, including material ESG risks. The board should assess and monitor culture and be engaged with the
workforce, shareholders and wider society.
Effective decision making requires a mix of skills around the table
and constructive debate between diverse and different-minded individuals. A range of skills, experience and perspectives should
be drawn together on the board. These include industry knowledge, experience from other sectors and relevant geographical knowledge.
Independence of thought plays a crucial role in the ability of a board to generate the debate and discussion that will challenge
management, help enhance business performance and improve decision-making. Board assessments will help the board ensure
it has the necessary mix of skills, diversity and quality of individuals to address the current risks and opportunities the company
faces. Unitary boards should comprise an appropriate combination of executive and non- executive directors such that no group of
individuals dominates decision-making. We expect the size of the board to reflect the size, nature and complexity of the business.
We also expect regular internal and external board evaluations which include an assessment of board composition and effectiveness.
Running businesses effectively for the long term requires effective
collaboration and cooperation, with no individual or small group having unfettered powers. Nor should they have dominant influence
over the way a business is run or over major decisions about its operations or future. There should be a division of responsibility
between board leadership and executive leadership of the business. We believe that there should be a division of roles at the top
of the organisation, typically between a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and an independent Chair.
Companies should be led and overseen by genuinely independent boards.
When looking at board composition we generally expect to see a majority of independent directors, with boards identifying their
independence classifications in the Annual Report. It is preferable to see an identified Senior Independent Director (SID) on the
board, who will lead the appraisal of and succession planning for the Chair. We expect SIDs to meet with investors and be a point
of contact for escalating concerns if required.
In assessing a director’s independence we will have due regard
for whether a director:
Regular refreshment of the non-executive portion of a board helps draw
in fresh perspectives, not least in the context of changes to business and emerging opportunities and risks. It also helps limit
the danger of group-think. Thoughtful and proactive succession planning is therefore needed for board continuity, to ensure that
a board is populated by individuals with an appropriate mix of skills, experience and perspective. We expect the board to implement
a formal process for the recruitment and appointment of new directors, and to provide transparency of this in the Annual Report.
We believe that companies that make progress in diversity and inclusion
(D&I) are better positioned for long-term sustainability and outperformance. Diversity of thought, paired with a culture of
inclusion, can help companies to tackle increasingly complex challenges and markets. We expect boards to report on how they promote
D&I throughout the business and believe that setting targets is important to addressing imbalances. We recognise the importance
of adopting a regional approach to diversity and inclusion, allowing us to press for progress with appropriate consideration
for the starting point. We have for several years, actively encouraged progress in gender diversity at all levels, and have expanded
our scope in relation to diversity and inclusion across geographies. In respect of ethnic diversity, this is coming increasingly
into focus as we encourage boards to progress in ensuring that their composition reflects their employee and customer bases.
Our regional specific policies are below. In determining our votes
we will take account of mitigating factors, such as the sudden departure of a female board member. We will also consider any clear
progress being made by the company on diversity and any assurance that diversity shortfalls will soon be addressed.
Individual directors need sufficient time to carry out their role effectively
and therefore we seek to ensure that all directors maintain an appropriate level of overall commitments such that allows them to be properly
diligent.
Boards should establish committees, populated by independent and appropriately
skilled non-executive directors, to oversee (as a minimum) the nomination, audit and remuneration processes. It may also be appropriate
for additional committees to be established, such as a risk or sustainability committee. These committees should report openly
on an annual basis about their activities and key decisions taken.
This committee has responsibility for leading the process for orderly
non-executive and senior management succession planning and recruitment, and for overseeing the composition of the board including skillset,
experience and diversity. We expect the committee to be comprised of a majority of independent directors with an independent Chair.
This committee has responsibility for
monitoring the integrity of the financial statements, reviewing the company’s internal financial controls and risk management
systems, reviewing the effectiveness of the company’s internal audit function and appointing auditors. While we prefer the
committee to be wholly independent, at minimum we expect the committee to be comprised of a majority of independent directors with
an independent Chair and at least one member having recent and relevant financial experience.
We expect to be able to hold
boards to account through engagement and regular director re-elections and directors should feel that they are accountable to investors.
We encourage individual, rather than bundled, director elections. While our preference is for directors to be subject to re-election
annually, we expect re-elections to take place at least every three years. Lengthier board mandates, while not uncommon in some
markets, risk divorcing directors from an appropriate sense of accountability. Directors and management should make themselves
available for discussions with major shareholders as we expect to have open dialogue to share our perspectives and gain confidence
that the individuals are carrying out their roles with appropriate vigour and diligence. A further important element of director
accountability to shareholders is that investors should have the right, both formal and informal, to propose and promote
individual directors to be considered for election to the board by all shareholders.
A company’s board should present a fair,
balanced and understandable assessment of the company’s position and prospects – financial and non-financial –
and of how it has fulfilled its responsibilities. We support the principle of full disclosure of relevant and useful information,
subject to issues of commercial confidentiality and prejudice. Boilerplate disclosure should be avoided. We encourage companies
to consider using the appropriate globally developed standards and would particularly encourage the use of those created by the
Taskforce for Climate related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), the Sustainability
Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Audited reporting and financial numbers should be
published ahead of any relevant shareholder meetings. We continue to monitor the evolving reporting landscape and consider new
reporting developments as they emerge, either voluntary or regulatory.
The board is responsible for determining the company’s risk appetite, establishing procedures to manage risk and for
monitoring the company’s internal controls. We expect boards to conduct robust assessments of the company’s material
risks and report to shareholders on risks, controls and effectiveness. The introduction of global accounting standards has led
to much greater investor confidence in the accounts produced by companies around the world. It has also assisted in creating consistency
of reporting across companies, enabling fairer comparisons between different operating businesses. We therefore encourage companies
seeking international investment to report under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) or US GAAP. As a firm abrdn
supports the continued development of high quality global accounting standards.
An independent audit, delivered by a respected
audit firm, is a required element for investor confidence in reporting by companies. We strongly favour meaningful, transparent
and informative auditor reports, giving us additional insights into the audit process and accounting outcomes. Audit fees must
be sufficient to pay for an appropriately in-depth assurance process. We would be concerned if a company sought to make savings
in this respect as the cost in terms of damage to audit effectiveness and confidence in the company’s accounts would be much
more substantial.
The independence of the auditor and the standard of their work, particularly in challenging management, should
be subject to regular assessment that is appropriately disclosed. Even when individuals carrying out the audit are refreshed,
we believe that the independence of the audit firm erodes over time and we will encourage a tender process and change of audit
firm where an engagement has lasted for an extended period. In order to demonstrate the level of independence, companies should
not have the same audit firm in place for more than 20 years.
The relationship with the auditor should be mediated through the
audit committee. Where we are significant shareholders, we expect to be consulted on plans to tender and replace auditors.
Remuneration policies and the overall levels
of pay should be aligned with strategy, attracting and retaining talent and incentivising the decisions and behaviours needed to
create long-term value. The component parts of remuneration should be structured so as to link rewards to corporate and individual
performance and they should be considered in the context of the remuneration policies when taken as a whole. We recognise the benefits
of simplicity in forming the policy, which should clearly link outcomes and expectations for those receiving the remuneration,
as well as external stakeholders. The structure should be transparent and understandable.
A company’s annual report
should contain an informative statement of remuneration policy which communicates clearly to stakeholders how it has developed
and evolved. This should include details of any stress testing that may have been undertaken to understand the policy outcomes
for different business scenarios. The remuneration committee should provide a clear description of the application of policy and
the outcomes achieved.
Base salary should be set at a level appropriate for the role and responsibility of the executive. We discourage
increases which are driven by peer benchmarking, and expect increases to be aligned with the wider workforce. Consideration
should also be given to the knock on impact to variable remuneration potential. Pension arrangements and benefits should be clearly
disclosed. We generally expect pension structures to be aligned with the wider workforce.
A company should structure variable,
performance- related pay to incentivise and reward management in a manner that is aligned with the company’s sustainable
performance and risk appetite over the long term. We expect all variable pay to be capped, preferably as a proportion of base salary.
In the UK we expect variable pay to be capped as a proportion of salary. In other markets, if variable pay is capped at a number
of shares, we expect the value of grants to be kept under review annually to ensure the value remains appropriate and is not excessive.
Performance metrics used to determine variable pay should be clearly
disclosed and aligned with the company’s strategy. A significant portion of performance metrics should seek to measure significant
improvements in the underlying financial performance of the company. We also encourage the inclusion of non-financial metrics linked
to targets which are aligned with the company’s progress on its ESG strategy. Where possible we expect these targets to be
quantifiable and disclosed.
Variable pay arrangements should incentivise participants to achieve above-average performance
through the use of challenging targets. We encourage sliding-scale performance measures and expect performance target ranges to
be disclosed to enable shareholders to assess the level of challenge and pay for performance alignment. We expect annual
bonus targets to be disclosed retrospectively and encourage the disclosure of long term incentive (LTI) targets at the beginning
of the performance period, but at minimum we expect retrospective disclosure. Where bonus or LTI targets are not disclosed due
to commercial sensitivity we expect an explanation of why the targets continue to be considered sensitive retrospectively and expect
some detail regarding the level of achievement vs target. Where a share price metric is being used, we expect this to be underpinned
by a challenging measure of underlying performance.
We encourage settlement of a portion of the annual bonus in shares which are
deferred for at least one year. We expect settlement of long term incentives to be in shares, with rationale provided for any awards
settled in cash. Long term incentives should have a performance period of no less than three years. In the UK we expect a further
holding period of two years to be applied, and we encourage this in other markets.
We do not generally support restricted
share schemes or value creation plans. We will consider supporting the use of restricted share plans which have been structured
consistent with the guidelines of the Investment Association.
We expect appropriate malus and clawback provisions to be applied
to variable remuneration plans.
We expect shareholding guidelines to be adopted for executive directors and encourage the adoption
of post- departure shareholding guidelines.
We expect details of any use of discretion to be disclosed and its use should
be justifiable, appropriate and clearly explained. We would expect policies to be sufficiently robust so that discretion is only
necessary in exceptional circumstances. We do not generally support exceptional awards, and are particularly sensitive to such
awards being granted to reward a corporate transaction.
We expect executive service contracts to provide for a maximum notice
period of 12 months. We will consider local best practice provisions related to severance arrangements when voting.
Non-executive
fees should reflect the role’s level of responsibility and time commitment. We do not support NED’s participation in
option or performance-related arrangements. However we do support the payment of fees in shares, particularly where conservation
of cash is an issue.
In the UK our expectations of companies are aligned with the Investment Association’s Principles of
Remuneration.
Where significant changes to remuneration arrangements are being considered, we would expect remuneration
committees to consult with their largest shareholders prior to finalising any changes. Where any increase to variable remuneration
is proposed, we would expect this to be accompanied by a demonstrable increase in the stretch of the targets. Furthermore we expect
any increases to remuneration to be subject to shareholder approval.
In response to the issues arising from the cost of living
crisis being experienced by many people in the UK, we expect companies to focus any additional help towards those members of the
workforce who need it most. We expect Remuneration Committees to take into account factors arising from the cost of living crisis
when deliberating over executive pay outcomes. We would be concerned by reputational issues arising from decisions made in these
unusual circumstances and may make this a factor in our voting decisions at relevant AGMs.
In line with the expectations
set out above we will generally vote against the appropriate resolution(s) where:
The interests of minority shareholders
must be protected and any major, or majority, investor should not enjoy preferential treatment. The structure of ownership or control
should minimise the potential for abuse of public shareholders.
Companies should not
make significant changes to their structure or nature without being fully transparent to their investors. Shareholders should have
the opportunity to vote on significant corporate activity, such as mergers and acquisitions. Where a transaction is with a related
party, only independent shareholders should have a vote. Even in markets where no vote is given to shareholders in these circumstances,
investors need transparent disclosure of the reasons for any such major change. Companies should expect that shareholders may want
to discuss and debate proposed developments
Diversification beyond the core skills of the business needs to be justified
as it is more often than not a distraction from operational performance. All major deals need to be clearly explained and justified
in the context of the pre- existing strategy and be subject to shareholder approval.
We will vote on corporate transactions
on a case by case basis.
We will generally support the payment of dividends but will scrutinise the proposed
level where it appears excessive given the company’s financial position.
The board carries
responsibility for prudent capital management and allocation.
We will consider capital raises which
are proposed for a specific purpose on a case by case basis but recognise that it can be beneficial for companies to have some
general flexibility to issue shares to raise capital. However we expect issuances to be limited to the needs of the business and
companies should not issue significant portions of shares unless offering these on a pro-rata basis to existing shareholders to
protect against inappropriate dilution of investments.
When considering our votes we will, however, take account of the company’s
circumstances and any further detail regarding proposed capital issuance authorities prior to voting.
Following changes
to the UK’s Pre-Emption Group Guidelines in November 2022, which reflect an increase on previous limits, we will hold
the Chair of the company accountable for any perceived misuse of the increased flexibility through a vote against their re-election.
Buyback We recognise that share buybacks can be a flexible means of returning cash to shareholders.
The nature of relations –
particularly any related party transactions (RPTs) – with parent or related companies, or other major investors, must be
disclosed fully. Related party transactions must be agreed on arm’s length terms and be made fully transparent. Where they
are material, they should be subject to the approval of independent shareholders.
While it is standard to see
proposals from companies to amend their articles of association or bylaws, we will review these on a case by case basis. When doing
so we expect full transparency of the proposed changes to be disclosed.
There should be no artificial
structures put in place to entrench management and protect companies from takeover. The best defence from hostile takeover is strong
operational delivery.
We are strong supporters of the principle
of ‘one share, one vote’ and therefore favour equal voting rights for all shareholders.
Shareholder meetings provide an important
opportunity to hold boards to account not only through voting on the proposed resolutions but also by enabling investors the opportunity
to raise questions, express views and emphasise concerns to the entire board. We may make a statement at a company’s AGM
as a means of escalation to reinforce our views to a company’s board.
We welcome the opportunity to attend meetings
virtually, being of the view that this can increase participation given obstacles such as location or meeting concentration. However
we are not supportive of companies adopting virtual-only meetings as we believe this format reduces accountability. Our preference
is for a hybrid meeting format to balance the flexibility of remote attendance with the accountability of an in-person meeting.
The effective management of risks extends to long-term issues that are hard to measure and whose timeframe
is uncertain and will include the management of environmental and social issues. We use the UN Global Compact’s four
areas of focus in assessing how companies are performing in this area.
Specifically we expect companies to be able to demonstrate
how they manage their exposures under the following headings.
It is generally accepted that
companies are responsible for the effects of their operations and products on the environment. The steps they take to assess and
reduce those impacts can lead to cost savings and reduce potential reputational damage. Companies are responsible for their impact
on the climate and they face increased regulation from world governments on activities that contribute to climate change.
We expect that companies will
Where we have serious concerns regarding a board’s actions, or
inaction, in relation to the environment we will consider taking voting action on an appropriate resolution.
We will use
the indicators within the Carbon Disclosure Project to identify companies which are not fulfilling their climate commitments. Where
appropriate we will take voting action to encourage better practice among companies which we deem to be laggards.
Companies that respect internationally
recognised labour rights and provide safe and healthy working environments for employees are likely to reap the benefits. This
approach is likely to foster a more committed and productive workforce, and help reduce damage to reputation and a company’s
license to operate. We expect companies to comply with all employment laws and regulations and adopt practices in line with the
International Labour Organization’s core labour standards. a minimum. In particular, companies will:
Where we have serious concerns regarding a board’s actions, or
inaction, in relation to labour and employment we will consider taking voting action on an appropriate resolution.
We recognise the impact that human-rights issues can have on our investments and the role we can play in stimulating
progress. We draw upon a number of international, legal and voluntary agreements for guidance on human-rights responsibilities
and compliance. Our primary sources are the International Bill of Rights and the core conventions of the International Labour Organisation
(ILO), which form the list of internationally agreed human rights, and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs),
which clarifies the roles of states and businesses. We encourage companies to use the UNGPs Reporting Framework and encourage disclosure
in line with this guidance. We expect companies to:
Where we have serious concerns regarding a board’s actions, or
inaction, in relation to human rights we will consider taking voting action on an appropriate resolution.
As institutions of wealth and influence, companies have a significant impact on the prosperity of their local communities
and the wider world. Having a robust code of ethics and ensuring professional conduct mean companies operate more effectively,
particularly when it comes to ethical principles governing decision- making. A company’s failure to conform to internationally
recognised standards of business ethics on matters such as bribery and corruption, can increase its risk of facing investigation,
litigation and fines. This could undermine its license to operate, and affect its reputation and image. We expect companies to
have policies in place to support the following:
Where we have serious concerns regarding a board’s actions,
or inaction, related to business ethics we will consider taking voting action on an appropriate resolution.
Our approach to vote analysis is consistent across active and quantitative
investment strategies
We are supportive of the steps being
taken by companies to provide transparent, detailed reporting of their ESG strategies and targets. While shareholder proposals
on environmental and social topics have been common on AGM agenda for several years, an increasing number of companies are presenting
management proposals, such as so called ‘say on climate’ votes, for shareholder approval. While we welcome the intention
of accountability behind these votes, we have reservations about the potential for them to limit the scope for subsequent investor
challenge and diminish the direct responsibility and accountability of the board and individual directors. We believe it is the
role of the board and the executive to develop and apply strategy, including ESG strategies, and we will continue to use existing
voting items to hold boards to account on the implementation of these strategies. As active investors we also regularly engage
with investee companies on ESG topics and find this dialogue to be the best opportunity to provide feedback.
We will review
the appropriateness of ‘say on climate’ votes and consider if other voting mechanisms should be applied to ensure both
Boards and Executives apply the appropriate rigour to initiate and deliver strategies to support the climate transition.
We are members of the Net Zero Asset Manager Initiatives
and this is reflected in our Active Ownership approach. We encourage the companies in which we invest to demonstrate a robust methodology
underpinning Paris aligned goals and targets and are supportive of resolutions that will help companies to achieve this. Once a
credible climate strategy is in place, we prioritise evidence of implementation over requests to re-draft strategies and targets
after only a year or two.
A growing number of resolutions call on companies to increase the transparency of their reporting
on climate- related lobbying. These proposals typically encompass direct lobbying undertaken by the company and indirect lobbying
undertaken by trade associations and other organisations of which it is a member or supporter. Lobbying contrary to the
objectives of the Paris Agreement is effective in creating climate policy inertia and impeding the transition to net zero economies.
We do not evaluate resolutions in isolation. Our approach recognises the links between corporate governance, strategy and
climate approach. Where a company’s operational response to climate change is inadequate, the effectiveness of board oversight
and corporate governance may also be called into question. We expect and encourage companies to:
Diversity & Inclusion
(D&I) is an important and growing theme for shareholder resolutions. In recent years resolutions have focussed on racial equity
audits, pay gap reporting, transparent disclosure of D&I metrics and assessments of the efficacy of D&I programmes.
A racial equity audit is an independent analysis of a company’s
business practices designed to identify practices that may have a discriminatory effect. We are supportive of racial equity audits
in relation to internal and external D&I programmes. It is appropriate that these programmes should have KPIs and audit mechanisms
in place to measure and evaluate outcomes. Some proposals request racial equity audits of provision of services. We are aware that
measuring provision of service is challenging and gathering racial data on customers can be difficult and inappropriate. There
are also multiple different factors that can influence service provision and which could be misconstrued as being racially
motivated. We will however, support resolutions which are not unduly prescriptive and allow companies to carry out audits within
a reasonable timeframe, at a reasonable cost, and excluding confidential or proprietary information. We consider standardised gender
pay gap disclosure to be an important tool for assessing how companies are addressing gender inequality. Reporting on gender pay
gaps across global operations can help companies to remain ahead of the regulatory curve. It also enables them to offer better
opportunities and remuneration for women around the world. We are therefore supportive of resolutions which are likely to deliver
these benefits. Proposals must be carefully drafted to achieve these outcomes. For instance, in the past we have been unable to
support resolutions which called for global median gender and racial pay gap reporting as it was unclear how this would reveal
potential pay disparities at a local level and how it could be implemented by companies with operations in jurisdictions where
collection of racial identity data is illegal.
In the US market we support public disclosure of EEO-1 forms by companies.
The EEO-1 form details a comprehensive breakdown of workforce by race and gender according to ten employment categories. The form
is submitted privately to the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on an annual basis. When publicly disclosed, it offers
investors and other stakeholders data in a standardised and comparable form. We have used our engagement programme to ask the
companies in which we invest to disclose this form for their US operations while making it central to our D&I voting approach
and supporting resolutions that request it.
In the Japanese market nuclear energy is a recurrent theme of shareholder
resolutions. The Japanese government is seeking to reduce the nation’s reliance on coal and its energy strategy presents safe nuclear
power generation as an important source of base-load power. In this context, resolutions which seek to limit or cease the nuclear operations
of an individual company do not appear to be in the best interests of shareholders and other stakeholders. The health & safety
risks associated with nuclear energy are high, must be managed carefully across the industry, and are an important consideration in our
voting.
This document is strictly for information purposes only and should not be considered as an offer,
investment recommendation, or solicitation, to deal in any of the investments or funds mentioned herein and does not constitute
investment research. abrdn does not warrant the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of the information and materials contained
in this document and expressly disclaims liability for errors or omissions in such information and materials.
Any research or analysis used in the preparation of this document
has been procured by abrdn for its own use and may have been acted on for its own purpose. The results thus obtained are made available
only coincidentally and the information is not guaranteed as to its accuracy. Some of the information in this document may contain projections
or other forward looking statements regarding future events or future financial performance of countries, markets or companies. These
statements are only predictions and actual events or results may differ materially. The reader must make their own assessment of the
relevance, accuracy and adequacy of the information contained in this document and make such independent investigations, as they may
consider necessary or appropriate for the purpose of such assessment. This material serves to provide general information and is not
meant to be investment, legal or tax advice for any particular investor. No warranty whatsoever is given and no liability whatsoever
is accepted for any loss arising whether directly or indirectly as a result of the reader, any person or group of persons acting on any
information, opinion or estimate contained in this document. abrdn reserves the right to make changes and corrections to any information
in this document at any time, without notice. This material is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written consent
of abrdn.
Applying ESG and sustainability criteria in the investment process may result in the exclusion of securities within the universe
of potential investments. The interpretation of ESG and sustainability criteria is subjective meaning that products may invest in companies
which similar products do not (and thus perform differently) and which do not align with the personal views of any individual investor.
Furthermore, the lack of common or harmonized definitions and labels regarding ESG and sustainability criteria may result in different
approaches by managers when integrating ESG and sustainability criteria into investment decisions. This means that it may be difficult
to compare strategies within ostensibly similar objectives and that these strategies will employ different security selection and exclusion
criteria. Consequently, the performance profile of otherwise similar vehicles may deviate more substantially than might otherwise be
expected. Additionally, in the absence of common or harmonized definitions and labels, a degree of subjectivity is required and this
will mean that a product may invest in a security that another manager or an investor would not.
abrdn plc is registered in Scotland
(SC286832) at 1 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 2LL.
N-2 - USD ($)
|
|
3 Months Ended |
12 Months Ended |
Dec. 17, 2024 |
Oct. 31, 2024 |
Jul. 31, 2024 |
[8],[9] |
Apr. 30, 2024 |
[8],[9] |
Jan. 31, 2024 |
[8],[9] |
Oct. 31, 2023 |
Jul. 31, 2023 |
[8],[9] |
Apr. 30, 2023 |
[8],[9] |
Jan. 31, 2023 |
[8],[9] |
Oct. 31, 2022 |
Jul. 31, 2022 |
[8],[9] |
Apr. 30, 2022 |
[8],[9] |
Jan. 31, 2022 |
[8],[9] |
Oct. 31, 2024 |
Oct. 31, 2023 |
Oct. 31, 2022 |
Oct. 31, 2021 |
Oct. 31, 2020 |
Oct. 31, 2019 |
Oct. 31, 2018 |
Oct. 31, 2017 |
Oct. 31, 2016 |
Oct. 31, 2015 |
Cover [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entity Central Index Key |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0001503290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment Flag |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
false
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N-CSR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entity Registrant Name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document Period End Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct. 31, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee Table [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder Transaction Expenses [Table Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shareholder transaction expenses |
|
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price)(1) |
[ ]% |
Offering expenses (as a percentage of offering price)(2) |
[ ]% |
Dividend reinvestment and optional cash purchase plan fees (per share for open-market purchases of common shares)(3) |
|
Fee for Open Market Purchases of Common Shares |
$0.02 (per share) |
Fee for Optional Shares Purchases |
$5.00 (max) |
Sales of Shares Held in a Dividend Reinvestment Account |
$0.12 (per share) and $25.00 (max) |
(1) If Common Shares or Preferred Shares are sold to or through underwriters, a prospectus or prospectus supplement will set forth any applicable sales load and the estimated offering expenses borne by the Fund.
(2) Offering expenses payable by the Fund will be deducted from the proceeds, before expenses, to the Fund.
(3) Shareholders who participate in the Fund's Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) may be subject to fees on certain transactions. The Plan Agent's (as defined under "Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase Plan" in the Fund’s Prospectus) fees for the handling of the reinvestment of dividends will be paid by the Fund; however, participating shareholders will pay a $0.02 per share fee incurred in connection with open-market purchases in connection with the reinvestment of dividends, capital gains distributions and voluntary cash payments made by the participant, which will be deducted from the value of the dividend. For optional share purchases, shareholders will also be charged a $2.50 fee for automatic debits from a checking/savings account, a $5.00 one-time fee for online bank debit and/or $5.00 for check. Shareholders will be subject to $0.12 per share fee and either a $10.00 fee (for batch orders) or $25.00 fee (for market orders) for sales of shares held in a dividend reinvestment account. Per share fees include any applicable brokerage commissions the Plan agent is required to pay. For more details about the Plan, see "Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase Plan" in the Fund’s Prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Load [Percent] |
[1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters Compensation [Percent] |
[2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Transaction Expenses [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Expenses [Table Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to Common Shares) |
Advisory fee(4) |
1.75% |
Interest expenses on bank borrowings(5) |
3.41% |
Dividends on Preferred Shares(6) |
0.44% |
Other expenses |
0.41% |
Total annual expenses |
6.01% |
Less: expense reimbursement(7) |
-0.16% |
Total annual expenses after expense reimbursement |
5.85% |
(4) The Adviser receives a monthly fee at an annual rate of 1.25% of the Fund’s average daily Managed Assets. The advisory fee percentage calculation assumes the use of leverage by the Fund as discussed in note (5) and (6). To derive the annual advisory fee as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets (which are the Fund’s total assets less all of the Fund’s liabilities including the liquidation preference on the Preferred Shares), the Fund’s average Managed Assets for the current fiscal year ended October 31, 2024 were multiplied by the annual advisory fee rate and then divided by the Fund’s average net assets for the same period.
(5) The percentage in the table is based on total borrowings of $240,000,000 (the balance outstanding under the Fund’s Credit Facility as of October 31, 2024, representing approximately 21.8% of the Fund’s Managed Assets) and an average interest rate during the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2024 of 6.83%. There can be no assurances that the Fund will be able to obtain such level of borrowing (or to maintain its current level of borrowing), that the terms under which the Fund borrows will not change, or that the Fund’s use of leverage will be profitable. The Fund currently intends during the next twelve months to maintain a similar proportionate amount of borrowings but may increase such amount to 33 1/3% of the average daily value of the Fund’s total assets.
(6) Based on 1,600,000 shares of Preferred Shares outstanding as of October 31, 2024 with an aggregate liquidation preference of $40 million and an annual dividend rate equal to 5.250% of such liquidation preference. The costs associated with the Preferred Shares are borne entirely by Common Shareholders.
(7) The Adviser contractually agreed to limit total "Other Expenses" of the Fund (excluding any interest, taxes, brokerage fees, short sale dividend and interest expenses and non-routine expenses) as a percentage of net assets attributable to common shares of the Fund to 0.25% per annum of the Fund's average daily net assets until September 20, 2025. The Fund may repay any such reimbursement from the Adviser, within three years of the reimbursement, provided that the following requirements are met: the reimbursements do not cause the Fund to exceed the lesser of the applicable expense limitation in the contract at the time the fees were limited or expenses are paid or the applicable expense limitation in effect at the time the expenses are being recouped by the Adviser. Because interest expenses and investment related expenses are not subject to the reimbursement agreement, interest expenses and investment related expenses are included in the “Total annual expenses after expense reimbursement” line item.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Fees [Percent] |
[3] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.75%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expenses on Borrowings [Percent] |
[4] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.41%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Expenses on Preferred Shares [Percent] |
[5] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.44%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual Expenses [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual Expenses [Percent] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.41%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Annual Expenses [Percent] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.01%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waivers and Reimbursements of Fees [Percent] |
[6] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.16%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Expense over Assets [Percent] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.85%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Example [Table Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example
The following examples illustrate the expenses you would pay on a $1,000 investment in common shares assuming that (i) all dividends and other distributions are reinvested at NAV (ii) the percentage amounts listed under “Total annual expenses” above remain the same in the years shown and (iii) a 5% annual portfolio total return.(1)
The following example does not include the sales load:
1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
$ 58 |
$ 176 |
$ 292 |
$ 571 |
(1) The examples above should not be considered representations of future expenses. Actual expenses may be higher or lower than those shown. The examples assume that all dividends and distributions are reinvested at net asset value. The Fund’s actual rate of return may be greater or less than the hypothetical 5% return shown in the examples. For more complete descriptions of certain of the Fund’s costs and expenses, see “Management of the Fund — Advisory Agreements” in the Fund’s Prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Example, Year 01 |
[7] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Example, Years 1 to 3 |
[7] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Example, Years 1 to 5 |
[7] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Example, Years 1 to 10 |
[7] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose of Fee Table , Note [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of the following table and the example below is to help you understand the fees and expenses that holders of Common Shares (“Common Shareholders”) would bear directly or indirectly. The expenses shown in the table under “Other expenses,” “Interest expenses on bank borrowings,” “Dividends on Preferred Shares,” “Total annual expenses” and “Total annual expenses after expense reimbursement” are based on the Fund’s capital structure as of October 31, 2024. As of October 31, 2024, the Fund had $280,000,000 of leverage outstanding through bank borrowings and Preferred Shares which represented 25.6% of the Managed Assets as of October 31, 2024. The table reflects Fund expenses as a percentage of net assets attributable to Common Shares. The following table should not be considered a representation of the Fund’s future expenses. Actual expenses may be greater or less than those shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis of Transaction Fees, Note [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a percentage of offering price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Highlights [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Securities [Table Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Period Ended) |
Title of Security |
Total Principal Amount Outstanding |
Aggregate Liquidation Preference |
Liquidation Preference Per Share |
Asset Coverage Per $1,000 of Principal Amount |
October 31, 2024 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 240,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 4,582 (1) |
October 31, 2024 |
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares |
$ 40,000,000 |
$ 40,000,000 |
$25.00 |
$ 3,927 (2) |
October 31, 2023 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 105,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 4,618 (1) |
October 31, 2023 |
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares |
$ 40,000,000 |
$ 40,000,000 |
$25.00 |
$ 3,344 (2) |
October 31, 2022 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 88,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,348 (1) |
October 31, 2022 |
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares |
$ 40,000,000 |
$40,000,000 |
$25.00 |
$ 2,302 (2) |
October 31, 2021 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 118,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,399 (1) |
October 31, 2021 |
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares |
$ 40,000,000 |
$40,000,000 |
$25.00 |
$ 2,538 (2) |
October 31, 2020 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 81,200,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,178 |
October 31, 2019 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 72,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,263 |
Fiscal Period Ended) |
Title of Security |
Total Principal Amount Outstanding |
Aggregate Liquidation Preference |
Liquidation Preference Per Share |
Asset Coverage Per $1,000 of Principal Amount |
October 31, 2018 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 83,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,217 |
October 31, 2017 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 83,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,402 |
October 31, 2016 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 83,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,305 |
October 31, 2015 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 90,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,166 |
(1) The asset coverage ratio for the Revolving Credit Facility is calculated by dividing net assets plus the amount of any borrowings, including Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares, for investment purposes by the amount of any senior securities, which includes the Revolving Credit Facility, and then multiplying by $1,000.
(2) The asset coverage ratio for the Fund's total leverage is calculated by dividing net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes by the amount of any borrowings, and then multiplying by $1,000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Securities Amount |
|
|
$ 240,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
$ 105,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
$ 88,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
$ 240,000,000
|
|
$ 105,000,000
|
|
$ 88,000,000
|
|
$ 118,000,000
|
|
$ 81,200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Securities Coverage per Unit |
|
|
$ 4,583
|
|
|
|
|
$ 4,618
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3,348
|
|
|
|
|
$ 4,583
|
|
$ 4,618
|
|
$ 3,348
|
|
$ 3,399
|
|
$ 3,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Liquidating Preference |
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
25
|
|
25
|
|
25
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Securities Average Market Value per Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 23.63
|
|
22.21
|
|
24.4
|
|
26.56
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Securities, Note [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Securities
The following table sets forth information about the Fund’s outstanding senior securities as of the end of each of the Fund’s last ten fiscal years. The Fund’s senior securities during this time period are comprised of borrowings which constitutes a “senior security” as defined in the 1940 Act. The information in this table for the fiscal years ended 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, and 2019 has been audited by KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. The Fund’s audited financial statements, including the report of KPMG LLP thereon, and accompanying notes thereto, are included in this Annual Report.
Fiscal Period Ended) |
Title of Security |
Total Principal Amount Outstanding |
Aggregate Liquidation Preference |
Liquidation Preference Per Share |
Asset Coverage Per $1,000 of Principal Amount |
October 31, 2024 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 240,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 4,582 (1) |
October 31, 2024 |
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares |
$ 40,000,000 |
$ 40,000,000 |
$25.00 |
$ 3,927 (2) |
October 31, 2023 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 105,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 4,618 (1) |
October 31, 2023 |
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares |
$ 40,000,000 |
$ 40,000,000 |
$25.00 |
$ 3,344 (2) |
October 31, 2022 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 88,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,348 (1) |
October 31, 2022 |
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares |
$ 40,000,000 |
$40,000,000 |
$25.00 |
$ 2,302 (2) |
October 31, 2021 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 118,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,399 (1) |
October 31, 2021 |
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares |
$ 40,000,000 |
$40,000,000 |
$25.00 |
$ 2,538 (2) |
October 31, 2020 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 81,200,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,178 |
October 31, 2019 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 72,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,263 |
Fiscal Period Ended) |
Title of Security |
Total Principal Amount Outstanding |
Aggregate Liquidation Preference |
Liquidation Preference Per Share |
Asset Coverage Per $1,000 of Principal Amount |
October 31, 2018 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 83,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,217 |
October 31, 2017 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 83,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,402 |
October 31, 2016 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 83,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,305 |
October 31, 2015 |
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility |
$ 90,000,000 |
-- |
-- |
$ 3,166 |
(1) The asset coverage ratio for the Revolving Credit Facility is calculated by dividing net assets plus the amount of any borrowings, including Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares, for investment purposes by the amount of any senior securities, which includes the Revolving Credit Facility, and then multiplying by $1,000.
(2) The asset coverage ratio for the Fund's total leverage is calculated by dividing net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes by the amount of any borrowings, and then multiplying by $1,000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Objectives and Practices [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Objectives and Policies
Investment Objectives
The Fund is a diversified, closed-end management investment company whose primary investment objective is to seek a high level of current income with a secondary objective of capital appreciation.
Principal Investment Strategy; Leverage
Depending on current market conditions and the Fund’s outlook over time, the Fund seeks to achieve its investment objectives by opportunistically investing primarily in loan and debt instruments (and loan-related or debt-related instruments, including repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements and derivative instruments) of issuers that operate in a variety of industries and geographic regions. The Fund expects to emphasize high current income, with a secondary emphasis on capital appreciation, by investing generally in senior secured floating rate and fixed rate loans and in second lien or other subordinated loans or debt instruments, including non-stressed and
stressed credit obligations, and related derivatives. Under normal market conditions, the Fund will invest at least 80% of its “Managed Assets” in any combination of the following credit obligations and related instruments: (i) senior secured floating rate and fixed rate loans (“Senior Loans”) (including those that, at the time of investment, are rated below investment grade by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (a “NRSRO”) or are unrated but deemed by the Advisers to be of comparable quality; these types of below investment grade instruments are commonly known as “junk” securities and are regarded as predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal); (ii) second lien or other subordinated or unsecured floating rate and fixed rate loans or debt (including those that, at the time of investment, could be considered “junk” securities as described above); (iii) other debt obligations, including high-yield, high-risk obligations (i.e., instruments that are commonly known as “junk” securities as described above) and “covenant lite” loans; (iv) structured products, including collateralized debt and loan obligations (collectively, “structured products”) that provide long or short exposure to other credit obligations; (v) swaps and other derivative instruments (including credit default, total return, index and interest rate swaps, options, forward contracts, futures contracts and options on futures contracts) that provide long or short exposure to other credit obligations; and (vi) short-term debt securities such as U.S. government securities, commercial paper and other money market instruments and cash equivalents (including shares of money market funds). Certain types of structured products, swaps and other derivative instruments provide short exposure to other credit obligations because the value of such instruments is inversely related to the value of one or more other credit obligations. “Managed Assets” are the total assets of the Fund (including any assets attributable to money borrowed for investment purposes, including proceeds from (and assets subject to) reverse repurchase agreements, any credit facility and any issuance of preferred shares or notes) minus the sum of the Fund’s accrued liabilities (other than Fund liabilities incurred for the purpose of leverage).
The Fund has no liquidity limitation or restriction, thus some or all its investments may be illiquid securities.
The Advisers have expertise in Senior Loans and subordinated debt instruments, including those of stressed and distressed issuers, and are responsible for the overall management of the Fund.
The Advisers seek to maximize risk adjusted returns, including by seeking to manage risk through shorting and other hedging strategies when deemed advisable by the Advisers. There can be no assurance that the Fund’s hedging strategies will succeed. The Advisers seek to achieve the Fund’s investment objectives while carefully evaluating risk/return within the capital structure of a company, as well as the industry and asset class. The Advisers look to maintain trading
flexibility and to preserve capital. They conduct thorough in-depth research and employ a disciplined investment philosophy and a consistent investment approach in their focus on credit opportunities. The Advisers’ investment teams use a robust credit process that includes research and analysis using a top-down/bottom-up approach to find mispriced or undervalued opportunities: from the top down, they consider macroeconomic themes of the overall credit market and industries, and from the bottom up, they conduct detailed fundamental analysis related to credit obligations of specific issuers, including examining issuers’ financials and operations, including sales, earnings, growth potential, assets, debt, management and competition. The Advisers also seek to understand historic and prospective industry trends affecting an investment opportunity.
The Fund can invest in both fixed-rate and floating-rate credit obligations.
When investing in credit obligations, the Fund may invest in the same securities or other credit obligations in which other accounts managed by the Advisers also invest. To the extent that the Advisers serve as an investment manager to other accounts in the future that have the same investment strategy as the Fund, investment opportunities within such strategy will, to the extent practicable, be allocated among the Fund and such other accounts on a pro rata basis or on such other basis as the Advisers determine to be fair and equitable to the Fund and such other accounts.
Investors should note that the investment advisory fee structure for other accounts managed by the Advisers may be different than the investment advisory fee structure for the Fund. The Fund offers an opportunity for its investors to have access to an investment strategy implemented by the Advisers, which normally is not directly available to retail investors, albeit only at the lower risk and return segment of the market.
The Advisers examine the material risks of an investment across a spectrum of considerations including financial metrics, regional and national conditions and industry specific factors. The Advisers may also consider the most material potential Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) risks and opportunities impacting issuers, where relevant. As ESG information is just one investment consideration, ESG considerations generally are not solely determinative in any investment decision made by the Advisers. The relevance of ESG factors to the investment process varies across issuers and instrument types. The Fund seeks to invest in securities of issuers that are expected to exhibit stable to improving credit characteristics based on industry trends, company positioning, and management strategy, taking into account the potential positive impact of any restructurings or other corporate reorganizations.
Leverage – The Fund is permitted to obtain leverage using any form or combination of financial leverage instruments, including reverse
repurchase agreements, credit facilities such as bank loans or commercial paper, and the issuance of preferred shares or notes. The Fund is permitted to obtain leverage using any form or combination of financial leverage instruments, including reverse repurchase agreements, credit facilities such as bank loans or commercial paper, and the issuance of preferred shares or notes.
The Fund is permitted to have financial leverage representing up to the maximum extent permitted by the 1940 Act. The 1940 Act generally prohibits the Fund from engaging in most forms of leverage representing indebtedness other than preferred shares unless immediately after such incurrence the Fund's total assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities (for these purposes, "total net assets") is at least 300% of the aggregate senior securities representing indebtedness (i.e., the use of leverage through senior securities representing indebtedness may not exceed 33 1/3% of the Fund's total net assets (including the proceeds from leverage)). Additionally, under the 1940 Act, the Fund generally may not declare any dividend or other distribution upon any class of its capital shares, or purchase any such capital shares, unless at the time of such declaration or purchase, this asset coverage test is satisfied. In addition, the 1940 Act limits the extent to which the Fund may issue preferred shares plus senior securities representing indebtedness to 50% of the Fund’s total assets (less the Fund’s liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities). Indebtedness associated with reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions may be aggregated with any other senior securities representing indebtedness for this purpose or be treated as derivatives transactions under the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, depending on the Fund’s election under applicable SEC requirements.
Portfolio Composition
Portfolio Construction Guidelines
In addition to the principal strategies noted above, the Fund follows the following portfolio construction guidelines The Fund will not invest in credit obligations or related instruments that, at the time of investment, are in default. The Fund may invest in credit obligations or related instruments that, at the time of investment, are likely to default. The credit obligations and related instruments in which the Fund may invest include mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities and securities whose value depends on the value of mortgage-backed or asset-backed securities. These types of investments present special risks. The Fund may act as a lender originating a Senior Loan.
Under normal market conditions, the Fund may also invest up to 20% of its Managed Assets in any combination of the following: (i) structured products that do not provide long or short exposure to other credit obligations; (ii) swaps and other derivative instruments
(including total return, index and interest rate swaps, options, warrants, forward contracts, futures contracts and options on futures contracts) that do not provide long or short exposure to other credit obligations; (iii) foreign currencies and foreign currency derivatives (including foreign currency related swaps, futures contracts and forward contracts) acquired for the purpose of hedging the currency risk arising from the credit obligations in the Fund's portfolio; and (iv) equity securities obtained through the conversion or exchange of convertible or exchangeable instruments, debt restructurings or bankruptcy proceedings and hedges on such positions. Structured products, swaps and other derivative instruments that do not provide long or short exposure to other credit obligations are those instruments whose reference or underlying assets or indices are not credit obligations or indices of credit obligations. Examples of such instruments include equity- and commodity-linked notes, total return swaps based on the value of an equity security and commodity futures contracts. The Fund may invest in such instruments in order, for example, (i) to seek current income or capital appreciation or (ii) to reduce the Fund's exposure solely to credit obligations. The Adviser believes that the flexibility afforded by being able to invest in such instruments may benefit the Fund by (i) allowing the Fund to invest in potentially attractive investment opportunities that are not credit obligations and (ii) increasing the mix of instruments in the Fund's portfolio which could reduce the overall risk of the Fund's portfolio. The Fund may use interest rate swaps to hedge the Fund’s liability with respect to its leverage. There can be no assurance that these benefits will be realized and such instruments may expose the Fund to risks not presented by credit obligations.
If the Fund receives equity securities in a debt restructuring or bankruptcy proceeding in an amount that would cause it to exceed the foregoing 20% limitation, the Fund will not be required to reduce its positions in such securities, or in any related hedges or any other investment, if the Adviser believes it would not be in the best interest of the Fund to do so.
Percentage limitations described in the Fund's prospectus are as of the time of investment by the Fund and may be exceeded after such time because of changes in the market value of the Fund's assets.
The Fund may not invest in a derivative (other than a credit default swap or a currency hedging instrument) if, immediately after the investment, derivatives (other than credit default swaps and currency hedging instruments) would represent more than 30% of the Fund's Managed Assets on a marked-to-market basis. The Fund may use derivative instruments for hedging, as well as speculative, purposes.
The Fund's policy of investing, under normal market conditions, in accordance with the foregoing portfolio construction guidelines, is not considered to be fundamental by the Fund and can be changed
without the vote of the Fund's shareholders by the Board with at least sixty (60) days written notice provided to shareholders.
Credit quality, liquidity and geographic origin of portfolio investments
The Fund may invest, without limitation, in credit obligations that are rated below investment grade by a NRSRO such as S&P or Moody’s or unrated credit obligations that are deemed by the Advisers to be of comparable quality, commonly known in either case as “junk” securities. Such securities are regarded as predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligations and involve significant risk exposure to adverse conditions. Any of the Fund’s investments may be issued, at the time of investment by the Fund, by “non-stressed” or “stressed” issuers. The Fund may invest in credit obligations of any maturity or duration. “Non-stressed issuers” generally refers to those issuers that are in compliance with respect to their financial obligations and are not stressed or distressed issuers. “Non-stressed obligations” generally refers to credit obligations issued by non-stressed issuers. “Stressed issuers” generally refers to those issuers that the market expects to become distressed issuers in the near future. “Stressed obligations” generally refers to credit obligations issued by stressed issuers. “Distressed issuers” generally refers to those issuers that are unable to service their debt. “Distressed obligations” generally refers to credit obligations issued by distressed issuers. The Fund does not intend to invest in credit obligations issued by issuers that, at the time of investment, the Advisers believe to be distressed issuers.
In making investments in accordance with the foregoing portfolio construction guidelines, the Fund may invest globally in U.S. and non-U.S. issuers’ obligations and such obligations may be U.S. dollar denominated as well as non-U.S. dollar denominated. The Fund typically seeks to limit its exposure to foreign currency risks by entering into forward transactions and other hedging transactions to the extent practical. There can be no assurance that the Fund’s currency hedging strategies will succeed. Under normal market conditions, the Fund expects to continue investing in both U.S. and non-U.S. issuers. The geographic areas of focus are subject to change from time to time and may be changed without notice to the Fund’s shareholders. There is no minimum or maximum limit on the amount of the Fund’s assets that may be invested in non-U.S. credit obligations generally or in emerging market credit obligations specifically.
The Fund may invest in loans and bonds issued by issuers of any size. The Fund’s focus with respect to borrower size is subject to change from time to time and may be changed without notice to the Fund’s shareholders. The Fund may invest in credit obligations at all levels of the capital structure. In investing in credit obligations, the Fund
focuses on senior secured debt and other senior debt (including senior unsecured debt issued by an issuer that has also issued senior secured debt). The Fund’s focus in this regard is subject to change from time to time and may be changed without notice to the Fund’s shareholders.
Portfolio Investments
The Fund’s investments (primarily in Senior Loans, subordinated loans and debt, other debt obligations, structured products and swaps – each of which is described in more detail below) may be all or substantially in investments that are generally considered to have a credit quality rated below investment grade by a nationally recognized statistical ratings organization (“NRSRO”) or unrated credit obligations that are deemed to be of comparable quality by the Advisers. Below investment grade securities (that is, securities rated Ba or lower by Moody’s Corporation (“Moody’s”) or BB or lower by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”)) are commonly referred to as “junk” securities and are regarded as predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligations and involve major risk exposure to adverse conditions. Generally, lower-grade securities provide a higher yield than higher-grade securities of similar maturity but are subject to greater risks, such as greater credit risk, greater market risk and volatility, greater liquidity concerns and potentially greater manager risk. Lower-grade securities are more susceptible to non-payment of interest and principal and default than higher-grade securities. Adverse changes in the economy or to the individual issuer often have a more significant impact on the ability of lower-grade issuers to make payments, meet projected goals or obtain additional financing. When an issuer of such securities is in financial difficulties, the Fund may incur additional expenditures or invest additional assets in an effort to obtain partial or full recovery on amounts due. Some of the securities held by the Fund, which may not be paying interest currently or may be in payment default, may be comparable to securities rated as low as C by Moody’s or CCC or lower by S&P. These securities are considered to have extremely poor prospects of ever attaining any real investment standing, to have a current identifiable vulnerability to default, to be unlikely to have the capacity to pay interest and repay principal when due in the event of adverse business, financial or economic conditions and/or to be in default or not current in the payment of interest or principal.
While all credit obligations tend to fluctuate inversely with changes in interest rates, the prices of lower-grade securities generally are less sensitive to changes in interest rates and are more sensitive to specific issuer developments or real or perceived general adverse economic changes than higher-grade securities. A projection of an economic downturn, for example, could cause a decline in prices of lower-grade securities because the advent of a recession could lessen the ability of a highly leveraged company to make principal and interest payments on its securities or obtain additional financing when necessary. A
significant increase in market interest rates or a general economic downturn could severely disrupt the market as well as the market values of such securities. Such securities also often experience more volatility in prices than higher-grade securities.
Unrated credit obligations are usually not as attractive to as many buyers as are rated credit obligations, a factor which may make unrated credit obligations less marketable. These factors may have the effect of limiting the availability of the credit obligations for purchase by the Fund and may also limit the ability of the Fund to sell such credit obligations at their fair value.
Few lower grade credit obligations are listed for trading on any national exchange, and issuers of lower grade credit obligations may choose not to have a rating assigned to their credit obligations by an NRSRO. As a result, the Fund’s portfolio may consist of a greater portion of unlisted or unrated credit obligations as compared with a fund that invests primarily in higher grade credit obligations.
The markets for lower-grade loans and debt credit obligations may be less liquid than the markets for higher-grade credit obligations. Liquidity relates to the ability to sell an obligation in a timely manner at a price which reflects the value of that obligation. To the extent that there is no established retail market for some of the lower-grade securities in which the Fund may invest, trading in such securities may be relatively inactive. Prices of lower-grade credit obligations may decline rapidly in the event a significant number of holders decide to sell. Changes in expectations regarding an individual issuer of lower-grade credit obligations generally could reduce market liquidity for such credit obligations and make their sale by the Fund more difficult, at least in the absence of price concessions. The effects of adverse publicity and investor perceptions may be more pronounced for securities for which no established retail market exists as compared with the effects on securities for which such a market does exist. An economic downturn or an increase in interest rates could severely disrupt the market for such credit obligations and adversely affect the value of outstanding credit obligations or the ability of the issuers to repay principal and interest. Further, the Fund may have more difficulty selling such credit obligations in a timely manner and at their stated value than would be the case for credit obligations for which an established retail market does exist.
During periods of reduced market liquidity or in the absence of readily available market quotations for lower-grade or other credit obligations held in the Fund's portfolio, the ability of the Fund to value the Fund's investments becomes more difficult and the judgment of the Advisers may play a greater role in the valuation of the Fund's investments due to the reduced availability of reliable objective data.
The Fund may invest in the credit obligations of stressed issuers, including obligations that are in covenant or payment default. Credit obligations that are or become stressed generally trade at prices
below par, thus creating opportunities for capital appreciation (or loss) as the values of such securities change over time. A security purchased at a deep discount may currently pay a very high effective yield. In addition, if the financial condition of the company improves, the underlying value of the obligation may increase, resulting in capital appreciation. If the company defaults on its credit obligations or remains in default, or if the plan of reorganization does not provide sufficient payments for debtholders, the deep discount credit obligations may stop generating income and lose value or become worthless. Such obligations are subject to a multitude of legal, industry, market, economic and governmental forces each of which make analysis of these companies inherently difficult. The Advisers rely on company management, outside experts, market participants and personal experience to analyze potential investments. There can be no assurance that any of these sources will provide credible information, or that the analysis of the Advisers will produce conclusions that lead to profitable investments for the respective portion of the Fund’s portfolio managed by each. The Fund relies on the Advisers' judgment, analysis and experience in evaluating the creditworthiness of an issuer. The amount of available information about the financial condition of certain lower-grade issuers may be less extensive than other issuers. In their analysis, the Advisers may consider the credit ratings of NRSROs in evaluating credit obligations although the Advisers do not rely primarily on these ratings. Credit ratings of NRSROs evaluate only the safety of principal and interest payments, not the market risk. In addition, ratings are general and not absolute standards of quality, and credit ratings are subject to the risk that the creditworthiness of an issuer may change and the NRSROs may fail to change such ratings in a timely fashion. A rating downgrade does not require the Fund to dispose of a security. The Advisers continuously monitor the issuers of credit obligations held in their respective managed portions of the Fund. Additionally, since most non-U.S. income credit obligations are not rated, the Fund will invest in such credit obligations based on the analysis of the Advisers without any guidance from published ratings. Because of the number of investment considerations involved in investing in lower-grade credit obligations and foreign income credit obligations, achievement of the Fund's investment objectives may be more dependent upon the credit analysis of the Advisers than is the case with investing in higher-grade credit obligations. Obligations of stressed issuers generally trade significantly below par and are considered speculative. The repayment of defaulted obligations is subject to significant uncertainties. Defaulted obligations might be repaid only after lengthy workout or bankruptcy proceedings or result in only partial recovery of cash payments or an exchange of the defaulted obligation for other debt or equity securities of the issuer or its affiliates, which may in turn be illiquid or speculative.
There are a number of significant risks inherent in the bankruptcy process. Many events in a bankruptcy are the product of contested
matters and adversary proceedings and are beyond the control of the creditors. There can be no assurance that a bankruptcy court would not approve actions that would be contrary to the interests of the Fund. A bankruptcy filing by an issuer may cause such issuer to lose its market position and key employees and otherwise become incapable of restoring itself as a viable entity, and its liquidation value may be less than its value was believed to be at the time of investment. In addition, the duration of a bankruptcy proceeding is difficult to predict and as such, a creditor’s return on investment can be adversely affected by delays while the plan of reorganization is being negotiated, approved by the creditors and confirmed by the bankruptcy court and until it ultimately becomes effective. The administrative costs in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding are frequently high and would be paid out of the debtor’s estate prior to any return to creditors. Further, in the early stages of the bankruptcy process it is often difficult to estimate the extent of any contingent claims that might be made and as such, there is a risk that the Fund’s influence with respect to the class of obligations it owns can be lost by increases in the number and amount of claims in that class or by different classification and treatment. A creditor, such as the Fund, can also lose its ranking and priority if it is determined that such creditor exercised “domination and control” over a debtor and other creditors can demonstrate that they have been harmed by such actions. In addition, certain claims have priority by law, such as claims for taxes, which may be substantial and could affect the ability of the Fund to be repaid.
In any investment involving stressed obligations, there is a risk that the transaction involving such debt obligations will be unsuccessful, take considerable time or will result in a distribution of cash or a new security or obligation in exchange for the stressed obligations, the value of which may be less than the Fund’s purchase price of such obligations. Furthermore, if an anticipated transaction does not occur, the Fund may be required to sell its investment at a loss. The Advisers seek to balance the benefits of deep discount credit obligations with the risks associated with investments in such obligations. While a diversified portfolio may reduce the overall impact of a deep discount obligation that is in default or loses its value, the risk cannot be eliminated. The Fund may sell portfolio securities without regard to the length of time they have been held to take advantage of new investment opportunities, when the Advisers believe the potential for high current income or capital appreciation has lessened, or for other reasons. The Fund’s portfolio turnover rate may vary from year to year.
Senior Loans
Senior Loans are business loans made to borrowers that may be corporations, partnerships or other entities that operate in a variety of industries and geographic regions. Senior Loans generally are negotiated between a borrower and several financial institution
lenders represented by one or more lenders acting as agent of all the lenders. The agent is responsible for negotiating the loan agreement that establishes the terms and conditions of the Senior Loan and the rights of the borrower and the lenders. The Fund may act as one of the original lenders originating a Senior Loan, may purchase portions of Senior Loans through assignments from lenders and may invest in participations in Senior Loans. Senior Loans have the most senior position in a borrower’s capital structure or share the senior position with other senior debt securities of the borrower. This capital structure position generally gives holders of Senior Loans a claim on some or all of the borrower’s assets that is senior to that held by unsecured creditors, subordinated debt holders and stockholders of the borrowers. Senior Loans also have contractual terms designed to protect lenders. The Fund will generally acquire Senior Loans of borrowers that, among other things, in the Advisers’ judgment, can make timely payments on their Senior Loans and that satisfy other credit standards established by the Advisers. Because of the protective features of Senior Loans, the Fund and the Advisers believe that Senior Loans of borrowers that are experiencing, or are more likely to experience, financial difficulty may represent attractive investment opportunities.
Interest rates on Senior Loans may be fixed or may float periodically. On floating rate Senior Loans, the interest rates typically are adjusted based on a base rate plus a premium or spread over the base rate. The base rate usually is a standard inter-bank offered rate, such as the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), the prime rate offered by one or more major U.S. banks, or the certificate of deposit rate or other base lending rates used by commercial lenders. Floating rate Senior Loans may adjust over different time periods, including daily, monthly, quarterly, semi-annually or annually. The Fund may use interest rate swaps and other investment practices to shorten the effective interest rate adjustment period of floating rate Senior Loans or to adjust the overall interest rate exposure of the Fund.
When interest rates rise, the values of fixed income securities generally decline. When interest rates fall, the values of fixed income securities generally increase. The prices of adjustable, variable or floating rate income securities tend to have less fluctuation in response to changes in interest rates, but will have some fluctuation particularly when the next interest rate adjustment on such security is further away in time or adjustments are limited in amount over time.
The Fund’s Senior Loan investments will typically be secured by specific assets of the borrower that qualify as collateral, such as trademarks, accounts receivable, inventory, buildings, real estate, franchises and common and preferred stock in its subsidiaries and affiliates. Collateral may also include guarantees or other credit support by affiliates of the borrower. In some cases, a Senior Loan may be secured only by stock of the borrower or its subsidiaries. The borrower may experience financial difficulty and/or the value of
collateral may decline over time. The loan agreement may or may not require the borrower to pledge additional collateral to secure the Senior Loan if the value of the initial collateral declines. In certain circumstances, the loan agreement may authorize the agent to liquidate the collateral and to distribute the liquidation proceeds pro rata among the lenders. As described below, the Fund may also invest in loans that are not secured by specific collateral. Investments in such unsecured loans involve a greater risk of loss.
Senior Loans also have contractual terms designed to protect lenders. Loan agreements often include restrictive covenants that limit the activities of the borrower. These covenants may include mandatory prepayment out of excess cash flows, restrictions on dividend payments, the maintenance of minimum financial ratios, limits on indebtedness and other financial tests. Breach of these covenants generally is an event of default and, if not waived by the lenders, may give lenders the right to accelerate principal and interest payments.
The proceeds of Senior Loans that the Fund will purchase typically will be used by borrowers to finance leveraged buyouts, recapitalizations, mergers, acquisitions, stock repurchases, debt refinancings and, to a lesser extent, for general operating and other purposes.
The Fund may purchase and retain in its portfolio Senior Loans of borrowers that have filed for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws or similar laws or that have had involuntary bankruptcy petitions filed against them by creditors. Investing in Senior Loans involves investment risk, and some borrowers default on their Senior Loan payments. The Fund attempts to manage these risks through selection of a varied portfolio of Senior Loans and analysis and monitoring of borrowers.
The Fund generally invests in a Senior Loan if, in the Advisers’ judgment, the borrower can meet its future payment obligations. The Advisers will perform their own independent credit analysis of the borrower in addition to utilizing information prepared and supplied by the agent or other lenders with respect to the portion of the Fund’s portfolio managed by each. When evaluating a borrower, the Advisers will consider many factors, including the borrower’s past and future projected financial performance. The Advisers also consider a borrower’s management, collateral and industry. The Fund generally acquires a collateralized Senior Loan if the Advisers believe that the collateral coverage equals or exceeds the outstanding principal amount of the Senior Loan. The Advisers continue to monitor a borrower on an ongoing basis for so long as the Fund continues to own the Senior Loan. Although the Advisers use their best judgment in selecting Senior Loans, there can be no assurance that such analysis will disclose factors that may impair the value of a Senior Loan. The Fund’s NAV of the Common Shares fluctuates as a result of changes in the credit quality of borrowers and other factors. A serious
deterioration in the credit quality of a borrower could cause a permanent decrease in the Fund’s NAV of the Common Shares.
There is no minimum rating or other independent evaluation of a borrower or its securities limiting the Fund’s investments. Although a Senior Loan may not be rated by a NRSRO at the time the Fund purchases the Senior Loan, NRSROs have become more active in rating Senior Loans, and at any given time a substantial portion of the Senior Loans in the Fund’s portfolio may be rated. There is no limit on the percentage of the Fund’s assets that may be invested in Senior Loans that are rated below investment grade or that are unrated but deemed by the Advisers to be of comparable quality.
Original Lender. When the Fund acts as an original lender, it may participate in structuring the Senior Loan. When the Fund is an original lender, it will have a direct contractual relationship with the borrower, may enforce compliance of the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement and may have rights with respect to any funds acquired by other lenders through set-off. Lenders typically also have full voting and consent rights under loan agreements. Certain actions of the borrower typically requires the vote or consent of the holders of some specified percentage of the outstanding principal amount of the Senior Loan. Certain decisions, such as reducing the amount of interest on or principal of a Senior Loan, releasing collateral, changing the maturity of a Senior Loan or a change in control of the borrower, frequently require the unanimous vote or consent of all lenders affected. The Fund intends never to act as the agent or principal negotiator or administrator of a Senior Loan, except to the extent it might be considered to be the principal negotiator of a loan negotiated by the Advisers for the Fund and/or one or more other registered investment companies managed by the Advisers.
The Fund will not act as an original lender for a loan if, after making such loan, loans originated by the Fund would exceed 5% of the Fund’s Managed Assets. The Fund will generally only act as an original lender for a loan if, among other things, in the Advisers’ judgment, the borrower can make timely payments on its loans and satisfy other credit standards established by the Advisers. The Advisers rely primarily on their own evaluation of the credit quality of such a borrower. As a result, the Fund is particularly dependent on the analytical abilities of the Advisers. Because of the nature of its investments, the Fund may be subject to allegations of lender liability and other claims. In addition, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) deems certain persons to be “underwriters” if they purchase a security from an issuer and later sell it to the public. Although it is not believed that the application of this Securities Act provision would cause the Fund to be engaged in the business of underwriting, a person who purchases an instrument from the Fund that was acquired by the Fund from the issuer of such instrument could allege otherwise. Under the Securities Act, an underwriter may
be liable for material omissions or misstatements in an issuer’s registration statement or prospectus.
The Fund will not originate a loan (i) to a borrower that is a portfolio company controlled by a fund managed by the Advisers or their affiliates or (ii) where a fund or account managed by the Advisers or their affiliates is the agent, principal negotiator or administrator of the loan, except to the extent that the Advisers or another registered investment company managed by the Advisers might be considered to be the principal negotiator of a loan it negotiates for the Fund and/or one or more other registered investment companies managed by the Advisers.
Senior Loan assignments and participations. The Fund may purchase Senior Loans by assignment from a lender in the original syndicate of lenders or from subsequent assignees. The purchaser of a loan through an assignment typically succeeds to all the rights and obligations under the loan agreement of the assigning lender and becomes a lender under the loan agreement. Assignments may, however, be arranged through private negotiations, and the rights and obligations acquired by the purchaser of an assignment may differ from, and be more limited than, those held by the assigning lender. The Fund may also purchase participations from lenders in the original syndicate making Senior Loans. When the Fund purchases an interest in a loan through a participation, the Fund will usually have a contractual relationship only with the lender selling the participation and not with the borrower. The Fund may have the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is entitled only from the lender selling the participation and only upon receipt by the lender of such payments from the borrower. As a result, the Fund may assume the credit risk of both the borrower and the lender selling the participation. In the event of insolvency of the lender selling a participation, the Fund may be treated as a general creditor of the lender.
In the case of a participation, the Fund generally will not have the right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the loan agreement, nor rights to any funds acquired by other lenders through set-off against the borrower. In addition, when the Fund holds a participation in a Senior Loan, it may not have the right to vote on whether to waive enforcement of any restrictive covenant breached by a borrower. Lenders voting in connection with a potential waiver of a restrictive covenant may have interests different from those of the Fund and may not consider the interests of the Fund. The Fund may not benefit directly from the collateral supporting a Senior Loan in which it has purchased the participation, although lenders that sell participations generally are required to distribute liquidation proceeds received by them pro rata among the holders of such participations.
The Fund generally will not have the right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the loan agreement, nor rights to any funds
acquired by other lenders through set-off against the borrower. In addition, when the Fund holds a Participation in a Senior Loan, it may not have the right to vote on whether to waive enforcement of any restrictive covenant breached by a borrower. Lenders voting in connection with a potential waiver of a restrictive covenant may have interests different from those of the Fund and may not consider the interests of the Fund. The Fund may not benefit directly from the collateral supporting a Senior Loan in which it has purchased the Participation, although lenders that sell Participations generally are required to distribute liquidation proceeds received by them pro rata among the holders of such Participations.
Second Lien or Other Subordinated or Unsecured Loans or Debt
The Fund may invest in second lien or other subordinated or unsecured loans or debt. Such loans or debt are made by public and private corporations and other non-governmental entities and issuers for a variety of purposes. As in the case of Senior Loans, the Fund may purchase interests in second lien or other subordinated or unsecured loans or debt through assignments or participations (each as described above).
Second lien loans are secured by a second priority security interest in or lien on specified collateral securing the borrower’s Senior Loans on a first lien basis. This means that Senior Loans are repaid in full with proceeds of the collateral before second lien loans are repaid. Second lien loans typically have less protections and rights as Senior Loans. Second lien loans are not (and by their terms cannot become) junior in lien priority to any obligation of the related borrower other than Senior Loans of such borrower. Second lien loans may have fixed or floating rate interest payments. Because second lien loans are secured on a junior basis to Senior Loans, they present a greater degree of investment risk but often pay interest at higher rates reflecting this additional risk. In addition, second lien loans of below investment grade quality share many of the risk characteristics of other non-investment grade securities.
Second lien and subordinated loans typically have greater price volatility than Senior Loans and may be less liquid.
Subordinated loans or debt may, and generally will, rank lower in priority of payment to Senior Loans and second lien loans of the borrower. Subordinated secured loans or debt typically are secured by a lower priority security interest in or lien on specified collateral, and typically have more subordinated protections and rights than Senior Loans and second lien loans. Subordinated loans may have fixed or adjustable floating rate interest payments. Because subordinated loans may rank lower as to priority of payment than Senior Loans and second lien loans of the borrower, they may present a greater degree of investment risk than Senior Loans and second lien loans but often pay interest at higher rates reflecting this additional risk. Other than their more subordinated status, such investments have many charac-
teristics and risks similar to Senior Loans and second lien loans discussed above. Subordinated interests of below investment grade quality share risks similar to those of below investment grade securities.
Unsecured loans or debt generally have lower priority in right of payment compared to holders of secured loans of the borrower. Unsecured loans are not secured by a security interest in or lien on specified collateral. Unsecured loans by their terms may be or may become subordinate in right of payment to other obligations of the borrower, including Senior Loans, second lien loans and other debt. Unsecured loans may have fixed or adjustable floating rate interest payments. Because unsecured loans are subordinate to the Senior Loans and secured debt of the borrower, they may present a greater degree of investment risk but often pay interest at higher rates reflecting this additional risk. Unsecured interests of below investment grade quality share risks similar to those associated with other below investment grade securities.
Structured Products
The Fund may also invest in structured products, including collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”), collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), structured notes, credit-linked notes and other types of structured products. Generally, investments in structured products are interests in entities organized and operated for the purpose of restructuring the investment characteristics of the underlying investment interests or securities. These investment entities may be structured as trusts or other types of pooled investment vehicles. This type of restructuring generally involves the deposit with or purchase by an entity of the underlying investments and the issuance by that entity of one or more classes of securities backed by, or representing interests in, the underlying investments or referencing an indicator related to such investments. The cash flow or rate of return on the underlying investments may be apportioned among the newly issued securities to create different investment characteristics, such as varying maturities, credit quality, payment priorities and interest rate provisions. The cash flow or rate of return on a structured product may be determined by applying a multiplier to the rate of total return on the underlying investments or referenced indicator. Application of a multiplier is comparable to the use of financial leverage, both being speculative techniques. Leverage magnifies the potential for gain and the risk of loss. As a result, a relatively small decline in the value of the underlying investments or referenced indicator could result in a relatively large loss in the value of a structured product. Holders of structured products bear risks of the underlying investment, index or reference obligation (including income risk, credit risk and market risk) and are subject to counterparty risk. Certain structured products may be terminated early by the issuer if it is unable to hedge its obligations under the product, which could result in a loss to the
Fund. In addition, the Fund may invest in other derivative instruments that are developed over time if their use would be consistent with the objectives of the Fund.
CDOs, CBOs and CLOs are types of asset-backed securities issued by special purpose vehicles created to reapportion the risk and return characteristics of a pool of assets. The underlying pool for a CLO, for example, may include domestic and foreign Senior Loans, senior unsecured loans and subordinate corporate loans, including loans that may be rated below investment grade or equivalent unrated loans. For CDOs, CBOs and CLOs, the cash flows are split into two or more portions, called tranches, varying in risk and yield. The assets, typically Senior Loans, are used as collateral supporting the various debt tranches issued by the special purpose vehicle. The key feature of these structures is the prioritization of the cash flows from a pool of underlying securities among the several classes of securities issued by a structured product. CBOs are structured debt securities backed by a diversified pool of high yield, public or private fixed income securities. These may be fixed pools or may be "market value" (or managed) pools of collateral. The riskiest portion is the "equity" tranche which bears the bulk of defaults from the bonds or loans in the trust and serves to protect to some degree the other, more senior tranches from default. Since it is partially protected from defaults, a senior tranche typically has higher ratings and lower yields than its underlying securities, and can be rated investment grade. Despite the protection from the equity tranche, the various tranches can experience substantial losses due to actual defaults, increased sensitivity to defaults due to collateral default and disappearance of protecting tranches, market anticipation of defaults, as well as aversion to such securities as a class.
Certain structured products may be thinly traded or have a limited trading market and may have the effect of increasing the Fund's illiquidity to the extent that the Fund, at a particular point in time, may be unable to find qualified buyers for, and may have difficulty valuing, these securities. CBOs, CLOs and other CDOs are typically privately offered and sold, and thus, are not registered under the securities laws. As a result, investments in CDOs may be characterized by the Fund as illiquid securities; however, an active dealer market may exist for CDOs allowing a CDO to be considered liquid in some circumstances. In addition to the general risks associated with fixed income securities discussed herein, CDOs carry additional risks including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or the collateral may go into default; (iii) the possibility that the CDOs are subordinate to other classes of obligations issued by the same issuer; and (iv) the complex structure
of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes with the issuer or unexpected investment results.
Structured notes are derivative securities for which the amount of principal repayment and/or interest payments is based on the movement of one or more "factors." These factors include, but are not limited to: currency exchange rates, interest rates (such as the prime lending rate or LIBOR), referenced bonds and stock indices. Some of these factors may or may not correlate to the total rate of return on one or more underlying instruments referenced in such notes. In some cases, the impact of the movements of these factors may increase or decrease through the use of multipliers or deflators. A credit-linked note is a derivative instrument that is an obligation between two or more parties where the payment of principal and/or interest is based on the performance of some obligation (a reference obligation).
The Fund may have the right to receive payments to which it is entitled only from the issuer of the structured product, and generally does not have direct rights against the issuer of, or the entity that sold, the assets underlying the structured product. While certain structured products enable the investor to acquire interests in a pool of securities without the brokerage and other expenses associated with directly holding such securities, investors in structured products generally pay their share of the structured product's administrative and other expenses.
Structured products may be private investment funds (structured as trusts or other types of pooled investment companies that are excluded from the definition of "investment company" under the 1940 Act by the operation of Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) thereof) or investment companies that are registered under the 1940 Act. Investment in such products involves operating expenses and fees that are in addition to the expenses and fees of the Fund, and such expenses and fees are borne indirectly by holders of the Fund's Common Shares.
Swaps
The Fund may enter into swap transactions, including credit default, total return, index and interest rate swap agreements, as well as options thereon, and may purchase or sell interest rate caps, floors and collars. A swap is a derivative in the form of an agreement to exchange the return generated by one instrument for the return generated by another instrument. A swap transaction involves swapping one or more investment characteristics of a security or a basket of securities with another party. The payment streams are calculated by reference to the investment characteristic(s) chosen applied to an agreed upon notional amount.
The Fund may write (sell) and purchase put and call swap options. A swap option, or swaption, is a contract that gives a counterparty the right (but not the obligation) to enter into a new swap agreement or to shorten, extend, cancel or otherwise modify an existing swap agreement, at some designated future time on specified terms.
Swaps generally do not involve the delivery of securities, other underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to swaps is limited to the net amount of payments that the Fund is contractually obligated to make. However, because some swap agreements have a leverage component, adverse changes in the value or level of the underlying asset, reference rate, or index can result in a loss substantially greater than the amount invested in the swap itself. If the other party to a swap defaults, the Fund's risk of loss consists of the net amount of payments that the Fund is contractually entitled to receive. Currency swaps usually involve the delivery of the entire principal value of one designated currency in exchange for the other designated currency. Therefore, the entire principal value of a currency swap is subject to the risk that the other party to the swap will default on its contractual delivery obligations. If there is a default by the counterparty, the Fund may have contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the transaction.
The Fund may engage in swaptions for hedging purposes, to manage and mitigate credit and interest rate risks and to gain exposure to credit obligations. The use of swaptions involves risks, including, among others, (i) changes in the market value of securities held by the Fund, and of swaptions relating to those securities may not be proportionate, (ii) there may not be a liquid market to sell a swaption, which could result in difficulty closing a position, (iii) swaptions can magnify the extent of losses incurred due to changes in the market value of the securities to which they relate and (iv) counterparty risk.
The Fund will usually enter into swaps on a net basis, i.e., the two payment streams are netted out in a cash settlement on the payment date or dates specified in the instrument, with the Fund receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments. The Fund may enter into over-the-counter derivatives transactions (swaps, caps, floors and puts).
It is possible that government regulation of various types of derivative instruments, including futures and swap agreements, may limit or prevent the Fund from using such instruments as part of its investment strategy, which could negatively impact the Fund.
Foreign Securities
The Fund may invest without limitation in securities of borrowers that are organized or located in countries other than the United States, including non-U.S. dollar denominated securities and may invest without limitation in obligations of issuers located in emerging market countries. The percentage of assets invested in securities of a
particular country or denominated in a particular currency will vary in accordance with the Fund's assessment of the relative yield, appreciation potential and the relationship of a country's currency to the U.S. dollar, which is based upon such factors as fundamental economic strength, credit quality and interest rate trends. Investments in securities of foreign issuers present certain risks not ordinarily associated with investments in securities of U.S. issuers, including that non-U.S. issuers may be subject to less rigorous accounting and reporting requirements than U.S. issuers, less rigorous regulatory requirements, different and perhaps not as well formulated and defined legal systems and laws relating to creditors' rights, the potential inability to enforce legal judgments and the potential for political, social and economic adversity. Investments by the Fund in non-U.S. dollar denominated investments will be subject to substantially similar risks to those associated with direct investment in securities of foreign issuers, and are subject to currency risk as well. Currency risk is the risk that fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and non-U.S. currencies may negatively affect an investment. The value of investments denominated in non-U.S. currencies may fluctuate based on changes in the value of those currencies relative to the U.S. dollar, and a decline in applicable foreign exchange rates could reduce the value of such investments held by the Fund. The Fund may also hold non-U.S. dollar denominated Senior Loans or other securities received as part of a reorganization or restructuring. In addition, the underlying issuers of certain depositary receipts, particularly unsponsored or unregistered depositary receipts, are under no obligation to distribute shareholder communications to the holders of such receipts, or to pass through to them any voting rights with respect to the deposited securities.
The foreign securities in which the Fund may invest may be issued by companies or governments located in emerging market countries. Investing in the securities of issuers operating in emerging markets involves a high degree of risk and special considerations not typically associated with investing in the securities of other foreign or U.S. issuers. Compared to the United States and other developed countries, emerging market countries may have relatively unstable governments, economies based on only a few industries and securities markets that trade a small number of securities. Securities issued by companies or governments located in emerging market countries tend to be especially volatile and may be less liquid than securities traded in developed countries. Securities in these countries have been characterized by greater potential loss than securities of companies and governments located in developed countries. Investments in the securities of issuers located in emerging markets could be affected by risks associated with expropriation and/or nationalization, political or social instability, pervasiveness of corruption and crime, armed conflict, the impact on the economy of civil war, religious or ethnic unrest and the withdrawal or non-renewal of any license enabling the Fund to trade in securities of a particular
country, confiscatory taxation, restrictions on transfers of assets, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards, less publicly available financial and other information, diplomatic development which could affect U.S. investments in those countries and potential difficulties in enforcing contractual obligations.
Since the Fund may invest in securities of foreign issuers denominated in the local currency, changes in foreign currency exchange rates will affect the value of securities in the Fund's portfolio and the unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments. In addition to changes in the value of the Fund's portfolio investments resulting from currency fluctuations, the Fund may incur costs in connection with conversions between various currencies. The Fund may also invest directly in currencies for hedging purposes. The Fund is subject to the risk that those currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. dollar. The values of the currencies of the emerging market countries in which the Fund may invest may be subject to a high degree of fluctuation due to changes in interest rates, the effects of monetary policies issued by the United States, foreign governments, central banks or supranational entities, the imposition of currency controls or due to other national or global political or economic developments. Foreign exchange dealers realize a profit based on the difference between the prices at which they are buying and selling various currencies. Thus, a dealer normally will offer to sell a foreign currency to the Fund at one rate, while offering a lesser rate of exchange should the Fund desire immediately to resell that currency to the dealer. The Fund conducts its foreign currency exchange transactions either on a spot (i.e., cash) basis at the spot rate prevailing in the foreign currency exchange market, or through entering into forward, futures or options contracts to purchase or sell foreign currencies. Therefore, the Fund's exposure to foreign currencies may result in reduced returns to the Fund. The Fund may also engage in foreign currency hedging transactions.
Investing in Euro-denominated (or other European currency-denominated) securities entails risk of being exposed to a currency that may not fully reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the disparate European economies. In addition, it is possible that the Euro could be abandoned in the future by countries that have already adopted its use. The effects of such an abandonment on the applicable country and the rest of the EMU are uncertain but could be negative and severe. Many European countries rely heavily upon export-dependent businesses and any change in the exchange rate between the Euro and the U.S. dollar can have either a positive or a negative effect upon corporate profits and the performance of investments in the European Union. Moreover, the possibility of one or more European countries exiting the EMU, or even of the collapse of the Euro as a common currency, has arisen. The effects of the collapse of the Euro, or of the exit of one or more countries from the EMU, on the United States and global economy and securities
markets are impossible to predict and any such events could have a significant adverse impact on the value and risk profile of the Fund's portfolio.
Foreign currency transactions. The Fund may enter into foreign exchange forward contracts ("forward contracts") for hedging or portfolio management purposes. A forward contract involves an obligation to purchase or sell a specific currency at a future date, which may be any fixed number of days from the date of the contract agreed upon by the parties, at a price set at the time of the contract. These contracts are traded in the interbank market conducted directly between currency traders (usually large, commercial and investment banks) and their customers. A non-deliverable currency forward contract is typically a short-term forward contract on a thinly traded non-convertible foreign currency where the profit and loss is the difference between a specified exchange rate and the spot rate at the time of settlement. A forward contract generally has no deposit requirement, and no commissions are charged at any stage for trades. By entering into a forward contract for the purchase or sale, for a fixed amount of dollars or other currency, of the amount of foreign currency involved in the underlying security transactions, the Fund may be able to protect itself against a possible loss resulting from an adverse change in the relationship between the U.S. dollar or other currency which is being used for the security purchase and the foreign currency in which the security is denominated during the period between the date on which the security is purchased or sold and the date on which payment is made or received. They may also be used to lock in the current exchange rate of the currency in which those securities anticipated to be purchased are denominated. At times, the Fund may enter into "cross-currency" hedging transactions involving currencies other than those in which securities that are held or proposed to be purchased are denominated. The Fund may also enter into currency swap transactions. A currency swap generally involves an agreement to pay interest streams in one currency based on a specified index in exchange for receiving interest streams denominated in another currency. Such swaps also usually involve initial and final exchanges of the designated currency that correspond to an agreed upon notional amount. Currency swaps usually involve the delivery of the entire principal value of one designated currency in exchange for the other designated currency. Therefore, the entire principal value of a currency swap is subject to the risk that the other party to the swap will default on its contractual delivery obligations.
The Fund may conduct its foreign currency exchange transactions either on a spot (i.e., cash) basis at the spot rate prevailing in the foreign currency exchange market, or through entering into forward contracts to purchase or sell foreign currencies. The Fund will not enter into forward contracts or maintain a net exposure to these contracts where the consummation of the contracts would obligate the Fund to deliver an amount of foreign currency in excess of the
value of the Fund's portfolio securities. When required by law, the Fund will cause its custodian bank to earmark cash or other liquid portfolio securities in an amount equal to the net amounts of the Fund's currency exposure under its forward contracts. If the value of the securities so earmarked declines, additional cash or liquid securities will be earmarked on a daily basis so that the value of such securities will equal the net amount of the Fund's currency exposure with respect to such contracts. Forward contracts may limit gains on portfolio securities that could otherwise be realized had they not been utilized and could result in losses. The contracts may also increase the Fund's volatility and may involve a significant amount of risk relative to the investment of cash.
Although the Fund values its assets daily in terms of U.S. dollars, it does not intend to convert its holdings of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars on a daily basis. It will, however, do so from time to time, and investors should be aware of the costs of currency conversion. Although foreign exchange dealers do not typically charge a separate fee for conversion, they do realize a profit based on the spread between the prices at which they are buying and selling various currencies. Thus, a dealer may offer to sell a foreign currency to the Fund at one rate, while offering a lesser rate of exchange should the Fund desire to resell that currency to the dealer.
Other Derivative Instruments
The Fund is permitted to use certain derivative instruments as portfolio management or hedging techniques. The Fund may seek to protect against possible adverse changes in the market value of securities held in or to be purchased for the Fund's portfolio, protect the Fund's unrealized gains, facilitate the sale of certain securities for investment purposes, protect against changes in currency exchange rates or adjust the exposure to a particular currency, manage the effective maturity or duration of the Fund's portfolio, or establish positions in the derivatives markets as a substitute for purchasing or selling particular securities. The Fund may also use derivative instruments to earn income. Among derivative instruments the Fund may utilize are forward contracts, options, futures contracts and options on futures contracts. In addition, the Fund may invest in other derivative instruments that are developed over time if their use would be consistent with the objectives of the Fund. However, currently, the Fund intends to use derivatives, primarily forward contracts, to hedge foreign currency risk, as described immediately above under “Foreign currency transactions”.
Derivative instruments have risks, including the imperfect correlation between the value of such instruments and the underlying assets, the possible default of the other party to the transaction and illiquidity of the derivative instrument. Furthermore, the ability to successfully use derivative instruments depends on the ability of the Fund to predict pertinent market movements, which cannot be assured. In addition,
transactions in such instruments may involve commissions and other costs, which may increase the Fund's expenses and reduce its return. Thus, the use of derivative instruments may result in losses greater than if they had not been used, may require the Fund to sell or purchase portfolio securities at inopportune times or for prices other than current market values, may limit the amount of appreciation the Fund can otherwise realize on an investment, or may cause the Fund to hold a security that it might otherwise sell. In addition, amounts paid as premiums and cash or other assets held in margin accounts with respect to derivative instruments are not otherwise available to the Fund for investment purposes.
When conducted outside the United States, transactions in derivative instruments may not be regulated as rigorously as in the United States, may not involve a clearing mechanism and related guarantees, and are subject to the risk of governmental actions affecting trading in, or the prices of, foreign securities, currencies and other instruments. The value of such positions also could be adversely affected by: (i) other complex foreign political, legal and economic factors; (ii) lesser availability than in the United States of data on which to make trading decisions; (iii) delays in the Fund's ability to act upon economic events occurring in foreign markets during non-business hours in the United States; (iv) the imposition of different exercise and settlement terms and procedures and margin requirements than in the United States and (v) lower trading volume and liquidity.
Equity Securities
Common stock generally represents an ownership or equity interest in an issuer, without preference over any other class of securities, including such issuer's debt securities, preferred stock and other senior equity securities. Common stocks are entitled to the income and increase in the value of the assets and business of the issuer after all its debt obligations and obligations to preferred stockholders are satisfied. Common stocks generally have voting rights. Common stocks fluctuate in price in response to many factors including historical and prospective earnings of the issuer, the value of its assets, general economic conditions, interest rates, investor perceptions and market liquidity. They may or may not pay dividends, as some issuers reinvest all of their profits back into their businesses, while others pay out some of their profits to stockholders as dividends, while others do not generate sufficient income to support a dividend.
Securities of other investment companies
The Fund may invest its assets in securities of other open- and closed-end investment companies, including affiliated registered investment companies to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. As a shareholder in an investment company, the Fund will bear its ratable share of that investment company's expenses, and will remain subject
to payment of the Fund's investment advisory and other fees and expenses with respect to assets so invested. Common Shareholders will therefore be subject to duplicative expenses to the extent that the Fund invests in other investment companies. Expenses will be taken into account when evaluating the merits of such investments. In addition, the securities of other investment companies may also be leveraged and will therefore be subject to certain leverage risks. The NAV and market value of leveraged securities will be more volatile and the yield to stockholders will tend to fluctuate more than the yield generated by unleveraged securities. Investment companies may have investment policies that differ from those of the Fund. If the Fund invests in securities issued by an investment company that are not credit obligations, such investment will only count toward the Fund's 80% portfolio guideline if the investment company itself has a policy to invest at least 80% of its assets in credit obligations.
Zero coupon bonds
Certain debt obligations purchased by the Fund may take the form of zero coupon bonds. A zero coupon bond is a bond that does not pay interest either for the entire life of the obligation or for an initial period after the issuance of the obligation. When held to its maturity, its return comes from the difference between the purchase price and its maturity value. A zero coupon bond is normally issued and traded at a deep discount from face value. Zero coupon bonds allow an issuer to avoid or delay the need to generate cash to meet current interest payments and, as a result, may involve greater market risk and credit risk than bonds that pay interest currently or in cash. The Fund would be required to distribute the income on any of these instruments as it accrues, even though the Fund will not receive all of the income on a current basis or in cash. Thus, the Fund may have to sell other investments, including when it may not be advisable to do so, to make income distributions to its shareholders. Distributions attributable to the Fund's "original issue discount" income accruing on zero coupon bonds, and of all other ordinary income, will generally be taxable to the Common Shareholders as ordinary income. As a consequence of selling investments in order to make distributions of "original issue discount" income and other income in respect of which the Fund has not received a corresponding amount of cash, the Fund may realize additional income that gives rise to additional distribution requirements; distributions of such additional income may be taxable to the Common Shareholders as ordinary income or as long-term capital gain depending on which investments are sold.
Repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements
The Fund may engage in repurchase agreements with broker-dealers, banks and other financial institutions to earn incremental income on temporarily available cash which would otherwise be uninvested. A repurchase agreement is a short-term investment in which the purchaser (i.e., the Fund) acquires ownership of a security and the
seller agrees to repurchase the obligation at a future time and set price, thereby determining the yield during the holding period. Repurchase agreements involve certain risks in the event of default by the other party. The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements with broker-dealers, banks and other financial institutions deemed to be creditworthy.
Repurchase agreements are required to be fully collateralized by the underlying securities and are considered to be loans under the 1940 Act. The Fund pays for such securities only upon physical delivery or evidence of book entry transfer to the account of a custodian or bank acting as agent. The seller under a repurchase agreement will be required to maintain the value of the underlying collateral securities marked-to-market daily at not less than the repurchase price. The underlying securities (normally securities of the U.S. government and its agencies or instrumentalities) may have maturity dates exceeding one (1) year.
The Fund may borrow through entering into reverse repurchase agreements under which the Fund sells portfolio investments to financial institutions such as banks and broker-dealers and generally agrees to repurchase them at a mutually agreed future date and price. Generally, the effect of a reverse repurchase agreement is that, during the term of the agreement, the Fund can obtain and reinvest all or most of the cash value of the portfolio investment it sold under the agreement and still be entitled to the returns associated with such portfolio investment—thereby resulting in a transaction similar to a borrowing and giving rise to leverage for the Fund. The Fund may utilize reverse repurchase agreements when it is anticipated that the interest income to be earned from the investment of the proceeds of the transaction is greater than the interest expense of the transaction.
In the event the buyer of securities under a reverse repurchase agreement files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, the Fund's use of the proceeds of the agreement may be restricted pending a determination by the other party, or its trustee or receiver, whether to enforce the Fund's obligation to repurchase the securities.
The Fund also expects to enter into other transactions that may give rise to a form of leverage including, among others, swaps, futures and forward contracts, options and other derivative transactions. However, these transactions may represent a form of economic leverage and will create risks. Further, the Fund may incur losses on such transactions (including the entire amount of the Fund’s investment in such transaction) even if they are covered.
When-issued and delayed delivery securities
The Fund may purchase and sell securities on a "when-issued" or "delayed delivery" basis whereby the Fund buys or sells a security with payment and delivery taking place in the future. The payment obligation and the interest rate are fixed at the time the Fund enters
into the commitment. No income accrues to the Fund on securities in connection with such transactions prior to the date the Fund actually takes delivery of such securities. These transactions are subject to market risk as the value or yield of a security at delivery may be more or less than the purchase price or the yield generally available on securities when delivery occurs. In addition, the Fund is subject to counterparty risk because it relies on the buyer or seller, as the case may be, to consummate the transaction, and failure by the other party to complete the transaction may result in the Fund missing the opportunity of obtaining a price or yield considered to be advantageous. When the Fund is the buyer in such a transaction, however, it will segregate cash and/or liquid securities having an aggregate value at least equal to the amount of such purchase commitments until payment is made. An increase in the percentage of the Fund's assets committed to the purchase of securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis may increase the volatility of the Fund's NAV.
Private placements and restricted securities
The Fund may invest in securities which are subject to restrictions on resale because they have not been registered under the Securities Act. These securities are generally referred to as private placements or restricted securities. Limitations on the resale of these securities may have an adverse effect on their marketability, and may prevent the Fund from disposing of them promptly at reasonable prices. The Fund may have to bear the expense of registering the securities for resale and the risk of substantial delays in effecting the registration.
The Fund has no liquidity limitation or restriction; thus, some or all of the Fund investments may be in illiquid securities. At times, private placements or restricted securities, as well as other securities in which the Fund may invest, may be deemed illiquid. Investments in illiquid securities tend to restrict the Fund's ability to dispose of instruments in a timely fashion and restrict the Fund's ability to take advantage of market opportunities.
Short sales
The Fund may engage in short sales. A short sale is a transaction in which the Fund sells an instrument that it does not own in anticipation that the market price will decline. To deliver the securities to the buyer, the Fund arranges through a broker to borrow the securities and, in so doing, the Fund becomes obligated to replace the securities borrowed at their market price at the time of replacement. When selling short, the Fund intends to replace the securities at a lower price and therefore, profit from the difference between the cost to replace the securities and the proceeds received from the sale of the securities. When the Fund makes a short sale, the proceeds it receives from the sale will be held on behalf of a broker until the Fund replaces the borrowed securities. The Fund may have to pay a premium to borrow the securities and must pay any dividends or
interest payable on the securities until they are replaced. The Fund's obligation to replace the securities borrowed in connection with a short sale will be secured by collateral deposited with the broker that consists of cash and/or liquid securities. Short sales involve certain risks and special considerations. If the Fund incorrectly predicts that the price of the borrowed security will decline, the Fund will have to replace the securities with securities with a greater value than the amount received from the sale. As a result, losses from short sales differ from losses that could be incurred from a purchase of a security, because losses from short sales may be unlimited, whereas losses from purchases can equal only the total amount invested.
Warrants
Warrants give holders the right, but not the obligation, to buy common stock of an issuer at a given price, usually higher than the market price at the time of issuance, during a specified period. The risk of investing in a warrant is that the warrant may expire prior to the market value of the common stock exceeding the price fixed by the warrant. Warrants have a subordinate claim on a borrower's assets compared with Senior Loans. As a result, the values of warrants generally are dependent on the financial condition of the borrower and less dependent on fluctuations in interest rates than are the values of many debt securities. The values of warrants may be more volatile than those of Senior Loans and this may increase the volatility of the Fund's NAV of the Common Shares.
Temporary investments
During the period in which the net proceeds of this offering are being invested, in order to keep the Fund's cash fully invested and, for defensive purposes, during periods in which the Advisers believe that changes in economic, financial or political conditions make it advisable to do so, the Fund may reduce its primary investment holdings (when taking a defensive position) and invest in certain short-term (less than one (1) year to maturity) and medium-term (not greater than five (5) years to maturity) debt securities or hold cash. The short-term and medium-term debt securities in which the Fund may invest consist of: (i) obligations of the U.S. government, its agencies or instrumentalities; (ii) bank deposits and bank obligations (including certificates of deposit, time deposits and bankers' acceptances) of U.S. or foreign banks denominated in any currency; (iii) floating rate securities and other instruments denominated in any currency issued by various governments or international development agencies; (iv) finance company and corporate commercial paper and other short-term corporate debt obligations of U.S. or foreign corporations; (v) repurchase agreements with banks and broker-dealers with respect to such securities; and (vi) shares of money market funds. The Fund intends to invest for these temporary purposes only in short-term and medium-term debt securities that the Advisers believe to be of high quality, i.e., subject to relatively low
risk of loss of interest or principal. In taking such positions, the Fund temporarily would not be pursuing and may not achieve its investment objectives. It is impossible to predict when, or for how long, the Fund will use these alternative strategies. There can be no assurance that such strategies will be successful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Factors [Table Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Factors
Market Risk. Market risk is the possibility that the market values of securities owned by the Fund will decline. The values of fixed income securities tend to fall as interest rates rise, and such declines tend to be greater among fixed income securities with longer remaining maturities. Market risk is often greater among certain types of fixed income securities, such as zero coupon bonds which do not make regular interest payments but are instead bought at a discount to their face values and paid in full upon maturity. As interest rates change, these securities often fluctuate more in price than securities that make regular interest payments and therefore subject the Fund to greater market risk than a fund that does not own these types of securities. The values of adjustable, variable or floating rate income securities tend to have less fluctuation in response to changes in interest rates, but will have some fluctuation particularly when the next interest rate adjustment on such security is further away in time or adjustments are limited in number or degree over time. The Fund has no policy limiting the maturity of credit obligations it purchases. Such obligations often have mandatory and optional prepayment provisions and because of prepayments, the actual remaining maturity of loans and debts may be considerably less than their stated maturity. Obligations with longer remaining maturities or durations generally expose the Fund to more market risk. When-issued and delayed delivery transactions are subject to changes in market conditions from the time of the commitment until settlement. This may adversely affect the prices or yields of the securities being purchased. The greater the Fund’s outstanding commitments for these securities, the greater the Fund’s exposure to market price fluctuations. Interest rate risk can be considered a type of market risk.
Credit Risk. Credit risk refers to the possibility that the issuer of a security will be unable to make timely interest payments and/or repay the principal on its debt. Because the Fund may invest, without limitation, in securities that are below investment grade, the Fund is subject to a greater degree of credit risk than a fund investing primarily in investment grade securities. Below investment grade securities (that is, securities rated Ba or lower by Moody’s or BB or lower by S&P) are commonly referred to as “junk” securities. Generally, lower-grade securities provide a higher yield than higher-grade securities of similar maturity but are subject to greater risks, such as greater credit risk, greater market risk and volatility, greater liquidity concerns and potentially greater manager risk. Such securities are generally regarded as predominantly speculative with
respect to the issuers’ capacities to pay interest or repay principal in accordance with their terms. Lower-grade securities are more susceptible to non-payment of interest and principal and default than higher-grade securities and are more sensitive to specific issuer developments or real or perceived general adverse economic changes than higher-grade securities. The market for lower-grade securities may also have less information available than the market for other securities, further complicating evaluations and valuations of such securities and placing more emphasis on the experience, judgment and analysis of the Advisers.
Credit obligations of stressed and distressed issuers (including those that are in covenant or payment default) are subject to a multitude of legal, industry, market, economic and governmental forces each of which make analysis of these companies inherently difficult. The Advisers rely on company management, outside experts, market research and personal experience to analyze potential investments. There can be no assurance that any of these sources will provide credible information, or that the Advisers’ analysis will produce conclusions that lead to profitable investments. Obligations of stressed and distressed issuers generally trade significantly below par and are considered speculative. The repayment of defaulted obligations is subject to significant uncertainties. Defaulted obligations might be repaid only after lengthy workout or bankruptcy proceedings or result in only partial recovery of cash payments or an exchange of the defaulted obligation for other debt or equity securities of the issuer or its affiliates, which may in turn be illiquid or speculative. There are a number of significant risks inherent in the bankruptcy process. Many events in a bankruptcy are the product of contested matters and adversary proceedings and are beyond the control of the creditors. A bankruptcy court may approve actions that would be contrary to the interests of the Fund. A bankruptcy filing by an issuer may cause such issuer to lose its market position and key employees and otherwise become incapable of restoring itself as a viable entity, and its liquidation value may be less than its value was believed to be at the time of investment. In addition, the duration of a bankruptcy proceeding is difficult to predict and, as such, a creditor’s return on investment can be adversely affected by delays while the plan of reorganization is being negotiated, approved by the creditors and confirmed by the bankruptcy court and until it ultimately becomes effective. The administrative costs in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding are frequently high and would be paid out of the debtor’s estate prior to any return to creditors. Further, in the early stages of the bankruptcy process it is often difficult to estimate the extent of any contingent claims that might be made and, as such, there is a risk that the Fund’s influence with respect to the class of obligations it owns could be lost by increases in the number and amount of claims in that class or by different classification and treatment. A creditor, such as the Fund, can also lose its ranking and priority if it is determined that such creditor exercised “domination
and control” over a debtor and other creditors can demonstrate that they have been harmed by such actions. In addition, certain claims have priority by law, such as claims for taxes, which may be substantial and could affect the ability of the Fund to be repaid.
In any investment involving stressed or distressed obligations, there is a risk that the transaction involving such debt obligations will be unsuccessful, take considerable time or will result in a distribution of cash or a new security or obligation in exchange for the stressed or distressed obligations, the value of which may be less than the Fund’s purchase price of such obligations. Furthermore, if an anticipated transaction does not occur, the Fund may be required to sell its investment at a loss. However, investments in equity securities obtained through debt restructurings or bankruptcy proceedings may be illiquid and thus difficult or impossible to sell.
Interest Rate and Income Risk. The income you receive from the Fund is based in large part on interest rates, which can vary widely over the short and long term. In a period of decreasing interest rates, your income from the Fund may decrease as well. The more the Fund invests in adjustable, variable or floating rate securities or in securities susceptible to prepayment risk, the greater the Fund’s income risk. Securities with longer durations are likely to be more sensitive to changes in interest rates, generally making them more volatile than securities with shorter durations. Lower rated fixed income securities have greater volatility because there is less certainty that principal and interest payments will be made as scheduled.
The risks attendant to changing interest rate environments have been, and continue to be, magnified in the current economic environment. To combat rising inflation, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System increased the federal funds rate several times in 2022 and 2023; however, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System decreased the federal funds rate in 2024, and the future of interest rates remains uncertain.
Prepayment or Call Risk. During periods of declining interest rates, it is possible that issuers of fixed income securities with high interest rates will prepay or “call” their securities before their maturity dates. In this event, the proceeds from the prepaid or called securities would likely be reinvested by the Fund in securities bearing the new, lower interest rates, resulting in a possible decline in the Fund’s income and distributions to shareholders.
Below Investment Grade (High-Yield or Junk Bond) Securities Risk. Fixed income securities rated below investment grade generally offer a higher current yield than that available from higher grade issues, but typically involve greater risk. These securities involve a greater risk of default, as they are especially sensitive to adverse changes in general economic conditions, to changes in the financial condition of their issuers and to price fluctuation in response to changes in interest rates. During periods of economic downturn or rising interest rates,
issuers of below investment grade instruments may experience financial stress that could adversely affect their ability to make payments of principal and interest and increase the possibility of default, and such negative impact can be sudden and significant. The secondary market for high-yield securities may not be as liquid as the secondary market for more highly rated securities, a factor which may have an adverse effect on the Fund’s ability to dispose of a particular security. There are fewer dealers in the market for high-yield securities than for investment grade obligations. The prices quoted by different dealers may vary significantly, and the spread between the bid and asked price is generally much larger for high-yield securities than for higher quality instruments. Under continuing adverse market or economic conditions, the secondary market for high-yield securities could contract further, independent of any specific adverse changes in the condition of a particular issuer, and these securities may become illiquid or less valuable even before a default occurs. In addition, adverse publicity and investor perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may also decrease the values and liquidity of below investment grade securities, especially in a market characterized by a low volume of trading. Unrated instruments involve the risk that the Advisers may not accurately evaluate the instrument’s comparative credit rating. As a result, the Fund’s investments in unrated instruments depend more heavily on the Advisers’ credit analysis than if the Fund invested in comparable rated instruments. Some unrated securities may not have an active trading market or may be difficult to value, and the Fund might have difficulty selling them at an acceptable price.
Risks of Senior Loans. There is less readily available and reliable information about most Senior Loans than is the case for many other types of instruments, including listed securities. Senior Loans are not listed on any national securities exchange or automated quotation system and as such, many Senior Loans are illiquid, meaning that the Fund may not be able to sell them quickly at a fair price. To the extent that a secondary market does exist for certain Senior Loans, the market is more volatile than for liquid, listed securities and may be subject to irregular trading activity, wide bid/ask spreads and extended trade settlement periods. The market for Senior Loans could be disrupted in the event of an economic downturn or a substantial increase or decrease in interest rates, resulting in fluctuations in the NAV of the Fund’s common shares (“Common Shares”) and difficulty in valuing the Fund’s portfolio of Senior Loans. Although the Advisers believe that the Fund’s investments in adjustable rate Senior Loans could limit fluctuations in the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares as a result of changes in interest rates, extraordinary and sudden changes in interest rates could nevertheless disrupt the market for such Senior Loans and result in fluctuations in the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares and difficulty in valuing the Fund’s portfolio of Senior Loans. Senior Loans, like most other debt obligations, are subject to the risk of default. Default in the payment of interest or principal on a Senior
Loan will result in a reduction of income to the Fund, a reduction in the value of the Senior Loan and a potential decrease in the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares. The risk of default will increase in the event of an economic downturn or a substantial increase in interest rates. The Advisers rely primarily on their own evaluation of borrower credit quality rather than on any available independent sources. As a result, the Fund is particularly dependent on the analytical abilities of the Advisers.
The Fund may acquire or hold Senior Loans of borrowers that are experiencing, or are more likely to experience, financial difficulty, including Senior Loans issued to highly leveraged borrowers or borrowers that have filed for bankruptcy protection. Borrowers may have outstanding debt obligations, including Senior Loans that are rated below investment grade. The Fund may invest a substantial portion of its assets in Senior Loans that are rated below investment grade or that are unrated at the time of purchase but are deemed by the Advisers to be of comparable quality. If a Senior Loan is rated at the time of purchase, the Fund may consider the rating when evaluating the Senior Loan but, in any event, does not view ratings as a determinative factor in investment decisions. As a result, the Fund is dependent on the credit analytical abilities of the Advisers. Because of the protective terms of Senior Loans, the Advisers believe that the Fund is more likely to recover more of its investment in a defaulted Senior Loan than would be the case for most other types of defaulted credit obligations. The values of Senior Loans of borrowers that have filed for bankruptcy protection or that are experiencing payment difficulty could be affected by, among other things, the assessment of the likelihood that the lenders ultimately will receive repayment of the principal amount of such Senior Loans, the likely duration, if any, of a lapse in the scheduled payment of interest and repayment of principal and prevailing interest rates. There is no assurance that the Fund will be able to recover any amount on Senior Loans of such borrowers or that sale of the collateral granted in connection with Senior Loans would raise enough cash to satisfy the borrower’s payment obligation or that the collateral can or will be liquidated. In the event of bankruptcy, liquidation may not occur and the bankruptcy court may not give lenders the full benefit of their senior position in the capital structure of the borrower.
The Fund may act as an original lender under Senior Loans or may acquire Senior Loans through assignments or participations. The Fund may make Senior Loans to, or acquire Senior Loans of, borrowers that, at the time of the making or acquisition of the loan by the Fund, are experiencing, or are likely to experience, financial difficulty (including highly leveraged borrowers) and such loans may constitute a material amount of the Fund’s portfolio. The Fund will not make Senior Loans to, or acquire Senior Loans of, borrowers that, at the time of the making or acquisition of the loan by the Fund, are in bankruptcy.
If the Fund acquires a Senior Loan through an assignment agreement, it will typically succeed to all the rights and obligations of the assigning institution and become a lender under the credit agreement with respect to the debt obligation purchased; however, its rights can be more restricted than those of the assigning institution, and, in any event, the Fund may not be able to unilaterally enforce all rights and remedies of the lenders under the loan agreement and with regard to any associated collateral. If the Fund acquires an interest in a Senior Loan through a participation agreement, the Fund will enter into a contractual relationship with the institution selling the participation, not with the borrower. In purchasing participations, the Fund generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement or any rights of setoff against the borrower, and the Fund may not directly benefit from the collateral supporting the debt obligation in which it has purchased the participation. As a result, the Fund will be exposed to the credit risk of both the borrower and the institution selling the participation. When purchasing a participation, the Advisers will analyze the credit risk posed by the institution selling the participation. The Advisers rely primarily on their own evaluation of the credit quality of such selling institutions rather than on any available independent sources. As a result, the Fund is particularly dependent on the analytical abilities of the Advisers. Because of the nature of its investments, the Fund may be subject to allegations of lender liability and other claims. In addition, the Securities Act deems certain persons to be “underwriters” if they purchase a security from an issuer and later sell it to the public. Although it is not believed that the application of this Securities Act provision would cause the Fund to be engaged in the business of underwriting, a person who purchases an instrument from the Fund that was acquired by the Fund from the issuer of such instrument could allege otherwise. Under the Securities Act, an underwriter may be liable for material omissions or misstatements in an issuer’s registration statement or prospectus.
In certain circumstances, Senior Loans may not be deemed to be securities, and in the event of fraud or misrepresentation by a borrower, lenders and purchasers of interests in loans, such as the Fund, will not have the protection of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, as would be the case for bonds or stocks. Instead, in such cases, lenders generally rely on the contractual provisions in the loan agreement itself, and common law fraud protections under applicable state law.
Leverage risks. The Fund’s leveraged capital structure creates special risks not associated with unleveraged funds having similar investment objectives and policies. The funds borrowed pursuant to the loan facility may constitute a substantial lien and burden by reason of their prior claim against the income of the Fund and against the net assets of the Fund in liquidation. The Fund is limited in its ability to declare dividends or other distributions in the event of default under the loan
facility. In the event of default under the loan facility, the lender has the right to cause a liquidation of the collateral (i.e., sell portfolio securities and other assets of the Fund) and, if any such default is not cured, the lender may be able to control the liquidation as well. The loan facility has a term of 364 days and is not a perpetual form of leverage; there can be no assurance that the loan facility will be available for renewal on acceptable terms, if at all.
The credit agreement governing the loan facility includes usual and customary covenants for this type of transaction. These covenants impose on the Fund asset coverage requirements, Fund composition requirements and limits on certain investments which are more stringent than those imposed on the Fund by the 1940 Act. The covenants or guidelines could impede the Fund’s Adviser or Sub-Adviser from fully managing the Fund’s portfolio in accordance with the Fund’s investment objective and policies. Furthermore, non-compliance with such covenants or the occurrence of other events could lead to the cancellation of the loan facility.
Covenant Lite Loans Risk. Covenant lite loans contain fewer maintenance covenants than traditional loans, or no maintenance covenants at all, and may not include terms that allow the lender to monitor the financial performance of the borrower and declare a default if certain criteria are breached. This may hinder the Fund’s ability to reprice credit risk associated with the borrower and reduce the Fund’s ability to restructure a problematic loan and mitigate potential loss. As a result, the Fund’s exposure to losses on such investments may be increased, especially during a downturn in the credit cycle.
Market events risk. The market values of securities or other assets will fluctuate, sometimes sharply and unpredictably, due to changes in general market conditions, overall economic trends or events, governmental actions or intervention, actions taken by the US Federal Reserve or foreign central banks, market disruptions caused by trade disputes, regional armed conflicts or other factors, political events within the U.S. and abroad, such as changes in the U.S. presidential administration and Congress, investor sentiment and other factors that may or may not be related to the issuer of the security or other asset. Economies and financial markets throughout the world are increasingly interconnected. Economic, financial, political or geopolitical events, trading and tariff arrangements, war, terrorism, natural disasters and other circumstances in one country or region could have profound impacts on global economies or markets. As a result, whether or not the Fund invests in securities of issuers located in or with significant exposure to the countries directly affected, the value and liquidity of the Fund's investments may be negatively affected. In addition, any spread of an infectious illness, public health threat or similar issue could reduce consumer demand or economic output, result in market closures, travel restrictions or quarantines, and generally have a significant impact on the world economy, which
in turn could adversely affect the Fund's investments. The impact of the recent U.S. elections on such policies remains uncertain and policies supported by the new administration (or the reversal of policies supported by the previous administration) could impact U.S. interest rates or inflation or otherwise impact the Fund.
Foreign Securities Risk. The Fund will invest in credit obligations, including loans, of issuers that are organized or located in countries other than the United States, including non-US dollar denominated securities. Investing in non-US issuers involves risks, including that non-US issuers may be subject to less rigorous accounting and reporting requirements than US issuers, less rigorous regulatory requirements, different legal systems and laws relating to creditors’ rights, the potential inability to enforce legal judgments, the potential for political, social and economic adversity and currency risk. These risks are heightened under adverse economic, market, geopolitical and other conditions.
Currency risk is the risk that fluctuations in the exchange rates between the US dollar and non-US currencies may negatively affect an investment. The value of investments denominated in non-US currencies may fluctuate based on changes in the value of those currencies relative to the US dollar, and a decline in such relative value could reduce the value of such investments held by the Fund.
Emerging Markets. The foreign securities in which the Fund may invest may be issued by companies or governments located in emerging market countries. Investing in the securities of issuers operating in emerging markets involves a high degree of risk and special considerations not typically associated with investing in the securities of other foreign or US issuers. Compared to the United States and other developed countries, emerging market countries may have relatively unstable governments, economies which may be more likely to take extra-legal action with respect to companies, industries, assets, or foreign ownership than those in more developed markets and therefore issuers of such emerging markets may be more affected by the performance of such industries or sectors. Emerging market economies may be based on only a few industries and securities markets that trade a small number of securities. Securities issued by companies or governments located in emerging market countries tend to be especially volatile (particularly during market closures due to local market holidays or other reasons) and may be less liquid than securities traded in developed countries. Securities in these countries have been characterized by greater potential loss than securities of companies and governments located in developed countries. Investments in the securities of issuers located in emerging markets could be affected by risks associated with expropriation and/or nationalization, political or social instability, pervasiveness of corruption and crime, armed conflict, the impact on the economy of civil war, religious or ethnic unrest and the withdrawal or non-renewal of any license enabling the Fund to trade
in securities of a particular country, confiscatory taxation, restrictions on transfers of assets, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards, less publicly available financial and other information, diplomatic development which could affect US investments in those countries, and potential difficulties in enforcing contractual obligations. International trade barriers or economic sanctions against foreign countries, organizations, entities and/or individuals in response to geopolitical tensions or conflicts may adversely affect the value of the Fund’s foreign holdings. The type and severity of sanctions and other similar measures are difficult to measure or predict. Emerging market countries generally have less developed legal, accounting and financial reporting systems than those in more developed markets, which may reduce the scope or quality of financial information available to investors. Moreover, it can be more difficult for investors to bring litigation or enforce judgments against issuers in emerging markets or for US regulators to bring enforcement actions against such issuers.
Foreign Currency Risk. Since the Fund may invest in credit obligations of foreign issuers denominated in the local currency, changes in foreign currency exchange rates will affect the value of credit obligations in the Fund’s portfolio and the unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments. In addition to changes in the value of the Fund’s portfolio investments resulting from currency fluctuations, the Fund may incur costs in connection with conversions between various currencies. The Fund may also invest directly in currencies for hedging purposes. The Fund is subject to the risk that those currencies will decline in value relative to the US dollar. The values of the currencies of the emerging market countries in which the Fund may invest may be subject to a high degree of fluctuation due to changes in interest rates, the effects of monetary policies of the United States, foreign governments, central banks or supranational entities, the imposition of currency controls or due to other national or global political or economic developments. Foreign exchange dealers realize a profit based on the difference between the prices at which they are buying and selling various currencies. Thus, a dealer normally will offer to sell a foreign currency to the Fund at one rate, while offering a lesser rate of exchange should the Fund desire immediately to resell that currency to the dealer. The Fund will conduct its foreign currency exchange transactions either on a spot (i.e., cash) basis at the spot rate prevailing in the foreign currency exchange market, or through entering into forward, futures or options contracts to purchase or sell foreign currencies. Therefore, the Fund’s exposure to foreign currencies may result in reduced returns to the Fund. The Fund may, from time to time, seek to protect the value of some portion or all of its portfolio holdings against currency risks by engaging in currency hedging transactions. Such transactions may include entering into forward currency exchange contracts, currency futures contracts and options on such futures contracts as well as purchasing put or call options on currencies, in US or foreign markets.
Currency hedging involves risks, including possible default by the other party to the transaction, illiquidity and, to the extent the view as to certain market movements is incorrect, the risk that the use of hedging could result in losses greater than if they had not been used. In addition, in certain countries in which the Fund may invest, currency hedging opportunities may not be available. The use of currency transactions can result in the Fund incurring losses because of the imposition of exchange controls, suspension of settlements or the inability of the Fund to deliver or receive a specified currency.
Investing in Euro-denominated (or other European currency-denominated) securities entails risk of being exposed to a currency that may not fully reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the disparate European economies. In addition, it is possible that the Euro could be abandoned in the future by countries that have already adopted its use. The effects of such an abandonment on the applicable country and the rest of the European Economic and Monetary Union (“EMU”) are uncertain but could be negative and severe. Many European countries rely heavily upon export-dependent businesses and any change in the exchange rate between the Euro and the US dollar can have either a positive or a negative effect upon corporate profits and the performance of investments in the European Union. The effects of the collapse of the Euro, or of the exit of one or more countries from the EMU, on the United States and global economy and securities markets are impossible to predict and any such events could have a significant adverse impact on the value and risk profile of the Fund’s portfolio.
The Fund computes and expects to continue to distribute its income in US dollars, and the computation of income is made on the date that the income is earned by the Fund at the foreign exchange rate in effect on that date. If the value of the foreign currencies in which the Fund receives its income falls relative to the US dollar between the date of earning of the income and the time at which the Fund converts the foreign currencies to US dollars, the Fund may be required to liquidate securities in order to make distributions if the Fund has insufficient cash in US dollars to meet distribution requirements. The liquidation of investments, if required, may have an adverse impact on the Fund’s performance.
Risks of Second Lien or Other Subordinated or Unsecured Loans or Debt. Second lien or other subordinated or unsecured loans or debt generally are subject to similar risks as those associated with investments in Senior Loans. In addition, because second lien or other subordinated or unsecured loans or debt are subordinated in payment and/or lower in lien priority to Senior Loans, they are subject to additional risk that the cash flow of the borrower and property securing the loan or debt, if any, may be insufficient to meet scheduled payments after giving effect to the senior secured obligations of the borrower. This risk is generally higher for subordinated unsecured loans or debt, which are not backed by a
security interest in any specific collateral. Second lien or subordinated loans or debt, both secured and unsecured, are expected to have greater price volatility than Senior Loans and may be less liquid. There is also a possibility that originators will not be able to sell participations in second lien loans and subordinated loans or debt, both secured and unsecured, which would create greater credit risk exposure. Second lien or other subordinated or unsecured loans or debt of below investment grade quality share risks similar to those associated with investments in other below investment grade securities and obligations.
Risks of Structured Products. The Fund may invest in structured products, including collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”), collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), structured notes, credit-linked notes and other types of structured products. Holders of structured products bear risks of the underlying investments, index or reference obligation and are subject to counterparty risk. The Fund may have the right to receive payments to which it is entitled only from the issuer of the structured product, and generally does not have direct rights against the issuer of, or the entity that sold, assets underlying the structured product. While certain structured products enable the investor to acquire interests in a pool of securities without the brokerage and other expenses associated with directly holding such securities, investors in structured products generally pay their share of the structured product’s administrative and other expenses. When investing in structured products, it is impossible to predict whether the underlying indices or prices of the underlying assets will rise or fall, but prices of the underlying indices and assets (and, therefore, the prices of structured products) will be influenced by the same types of political and economic events that affect particular issuers of securities and capital markets generally. Certain structured products may be thinly traded or have a limited trading market and may have the effect of increasing the Fund’s illiquidity to the extent that the Fund, at a particular point in time, may be unable to find qualified buyers for, and may have difficulty valuing, these securities.
CBOs, CLOs and other CDOs are typically privately offered and sold, and thus, are not registered under the securities laws. As a result, investments in CDOs may be characterized by the Fund as illiquid securities; however, an active dealer market may exist for CDOs allowing a CDO to be considered liquid in some circumstances. In addition to the general risks associated with fixed income securities discussed herein, CDOs carry additional risks including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or the collateral may go into default; (iii) the possibility that the CDOs are subordinate to other classes of obligations issued by the same issuer; and (iv) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the
time of investment and may produce disputes with the issuer or unexpected investment results.
Investments in structured notes involve risks including income risk, credit risk and market risk. Recent market conditions have magnified the risks related to an investment in structured products, including greater volatility, increased lack of liquidity and significant losses in value. Where the return on a structured note held by the Fund is based upon the movement of one or more factors, including currency exchange rates, interest rates, referenced bonds and stock indices, depending on the factor used and the use of multipliers or deflators, changes in interest rates and movement of the factor may cause significant fluctuations in the price of the structured note. Additionally, changes in the reference instrument or security may cause the interest rate on the structured note to be reduced to zero and any further changes in the reference instrument may then reduce the principal amount payable on maturity. Structured notes may be less liquid than other types of securities and more volatile than the reference instrument or security underlying the note.
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments risk. To the extent the Fund invests in asset-backed and mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) securities or other instruments, its exposure to prepayment and extension risks may be greater than other investments in fixed income instruments. Asset-backed securities are in particular subject to interest rate risk. Generally, asset-backed securities increase in value to a lesser extent when interest rates decline and generally decline in value to a similar or greater extent when interest rates rise. Asset-backed securities are also subject to liquidity, valuation and credit risk.
The value of, and income generated by, investments in mortgage-backed securities are subject to the risks of asset-backed securities in general and the real estate markets. Rising interest rates tend to extend the duration of mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments, making them more sensitive to changes in interest rates. In addition, mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments are subject to prepayment risk—the risk that borrowers may pay off their mortgages sooner than expected, particularly when interest rates decline. This can reduce the Fund’s returns because the Fund may have to reinvest that money at lower prevailing interest rates. Economic downturns, rises in unemployment and other developments that limit or reduce the activities of and demand for real estate spaces or heightened credit and default risks associated with underlying mortgages may adversely impact the value of, and income generated by, such securities. The Fund’s investments in other asset-backed instruments, such as securities backed by car loans, are subject to risks similar to those associated with mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) securities.
Privately issued asset-backed and mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments are typically not traded on an exchange and may have a limited market. Without an active trading market, these instruments may be particularly difficult to value given the complexities in valuing the underlying collateral. Unlike many mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments issued or guaranteed by the US government, its agencies and instrumentalities, or a government-sponsored enterprise (such as the Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae), asset-backed and mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments issued by private issuers do not have a government or government-sponsored enterprise guarantee and may, and frequently do, have less favorable collateral, credit risk or other characteristics. Although instruments issued by a government-sponsored enterprise are sometimes considered to carry an implicit guarantee from the US government, there can be no assurance that the US government would in fact guarantee such instruments.
Risks of Swaps. The Fund may enter into swap transactions, including credit default, total return, index and interest rate swap agreements, as well as options thereon, and may purchase or sell interest rate caps, floors and collars. Such transactions are subject to market risk, risk of default by the other party to the transaction (i.e., counterparty risk), risk of imperfect correlation and manager risk and may involve commissions or other costs. Swaps generally do not involve delivery of securities, other underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to swaps generally is limited to the net amount of payments that the Fund is contractually obligated to make, or in the case of the other party to a swap defaulting, the net amount of payments that the Fund is contractually entitled to receive. If the Advisers are incorrect in their forecast of market values, interest rates or currency exchange rates, the investment performance of the Fund would be less favorable than it would have been if these investment techniques were not used.
Counterparty Risk. Changes in the credit quality of the dealers that serve as the Fund’s counterparties with respect to derivatives, swaps or other transactions will affect the value of those instruments. In the event of a default by, or the insolvency of, a counterparty, the Fund may sustain losses or be unable to liquidate a derivative or swap position. Such risk is heightened in market environments where interest rates are changing, notably when rates are rising. The Fund and the Advisers seek to deal only with counterparties of high creditworthiness. All of the Fund’s bank or dealer counterparties (including bank or dealer derivative counterparties) will be subject to approval by the Advisers’ risk and compliance groups. The Advisers evaluate and monitor the creditworthiness of the Fund’s counterparties. Specifically, the Advisers’ risk and compliance personnel implement processes with respect to pre-approval, ongoing monitoring and parameters with respect to the Fund’s counterparty risk exposure. The
parameters and limitations that may be imposed depend on the creditworthiness of the Fund's counterparties and the nature of the transactions in which the Fund engages. The counterparty risk for cleared derivatives is generally lower than for uncleared over-the-counter derivative transactions since generally a clearing organization becomes substituted for each counterparty to a cleared derivative contract and, in effect, guarantees the parties’ performance under the contract as each party to a trade generally looks to the clearing organization for performance of financial obligations under the derivative contract. However, there can be no assurance that a clearing organization, or its members, will satisfy its obligations to the Fund. Counterparty risk also encompasses the risk of having concentrated exposure to one or more counterparties.
Financial Leverage Risk. The Fund is permitted to obtain leverage using any form or combination of financial leverage instruments, including reverse repurchase agreements, credit facilities such as bank loans or commercial paper, and the issuance of preferred shares or notes. The Fund intends to use leverage opportunistically and may choose to increase or decrease its leverage, or use different types or combinations of leveraging instruments, at any time based on the Fund’s assessment of market conditions and the investment environment.
There can be no assurance that a financial leveraging strategy will continue to be utilized by the Fund or that, if utilized, it will be successful during any period in which it is employed. Leverage creates risks for Common Shareholders, including the likelihood of greater volatility of NAV of the Common Shares and market price of, and distributions on, the Common Shares and the risk that fluctuations in the costs to borrow, or in the distribution or interest rates on any preferred shares or notes, may affect the return to Common Shareholders. To the extent the income derived from investments purchased with proceeds received from leverage exceeds the cost of leverage, the Fund’s distributions will be greater than if leverage had not been used. Conversely, if the income from the investments purchased with such proceeds is not sufficient to cover the cost of the financial leverage, the amount available for distribution to Common Shareholders will be less than if leverage had not been used. In the latter case, the Fund may nevertheless maintain its leveraged position if such action is deemed to be appropriate based on market conditions. The Fund has issued preferred shares. Holders of preferred shares will have rights to elect a minimum of two Trustees. This voting power may negatively affect Common Shareholders (or the interests of holders of preferred shares may differ from the interests of Common Shareholders). The use of leverage by the Fund may magnify the Fund’s losses when there is a decrease in the value of a Fund investment and even totally eliminate the Fund’s equity in its portfolio or a Common Shareholder’s equity in the Fund.
The costs of a financial leverage program (including the costs of offering preferred shares and notes) will be borne by Common Shareholders and consequently will result in a reduction of the NAV of the Common Shares. During periods in which the Fund is using leverage, the fees paid by the Fund for investment advisory services will be higher than if the Fund did not use leverage because the investment advisory fees paid will be calculated on the basis of the Fund’s Managed Assets, which includes proceeds from (and assets subject to) reverse repurchase agreements, any credit facility and any issuance of preferred shares or notes, so that the investment advisory fees payable to the Adviser will be higher when leverage is utilized. This will create a conflict of interest between the Advisers, on the one hand, and Common Shareholders, on the other hand. Fees and expenses in respect of financial leverage, as well as the investment advisory fee and all other expenses of the Fund, will be borne entirely by the Common Shareholders, and not by preferred shareholders, noteholders or any other leverage providers.
Any lender in connection with a credit facility may impose specific restrictions as a condition to borrowing. The credit facility fees may include, among other things, up front structuring fees and ongoing commitment fees (including fees on amounts undrawn on the facility) in addition to the traditional interest expense on amounts borrowed. The credit facility may involve a lien on the Fund’s assets. The Fund is currently a party to a credit facility. Similarly, to the extent the Fund issues additional preferred shares or notes, the Fund currently intends to seek a credit rating from one or more NRSROs on any preferred shares or notes it issues and the Fund may be subject to fees, covenants and investment restrictions required by the NRSRO as a result. Such covenants and restrictions imposed by a NRSRO or lender may include asset coverage or portfolio composition requirements that are more stringent than those imposed on the Fund by the 1940 Act. It is not anticipated that these covenants or restrictions will significantly impede the Advisers in managing the Fund’s portfolio in accordance with its investment objectives and policies. Nonetheless, if these covenants or guidelines are more restrictive than those imposed by the 1940 Act, the Fund may not be able to utilize as much leverage as it otherwise could have, which could reduce the Fund’s investment returns.
The Fund may enter into other transactions that may give rise to a form of leverage including, among others, swaps, futures and forward contracts, options and other derivative transactions. These transactions may represent a form of economic leverage and will create risks. The potential loss on derivative instruments may be substantial relative to the initial investment therein.
Sovereign debt securities risk. Investments in government debt securities involve special risks. Certain countries have historically experienced, and may continue to experience, high rates of inflation, volatile interest rates, exchange rate fluctuations, large amounts of
external debt, balance of payments and trade difficulties and extreme poverty and unemployment. The issuer or governmental authority that controls the repayment of a country’s debt may not be able or willing to repay the principal and/or interest when due in accordance with the terms of such debt. A debtor’s willingness or ability to repay principal and interest due in a timely manner may be affected by, among other factors, its cash flow situation and, in the case of a government debtor, the extent of its foreign reserves, the availability of sufficient foreign exchange on the date a payment is due, the relative size of the debt service burden to the economy as a whole, the government debtor’s policy towards the International Monetary Fund and the political constraints to which a government debtor may be subject.
Government debtors may default on their debt and may also be dependent on expected disbursements from foreign governments, multilateral agencies and others abroad to reduce principal and interest arrearages on their debt. The commitment on the part of these governments, agencies and others to make such disbursements may be conditioned on a debtor’s implementation of economic reforms and/or economic performance and the timely service of such debtor’s obligations. Failure to implement such reforms, achieve such levels of economic performance or repay principal or interest when due may result in the cancellation of such third parties’ commitments to lend funds to the government debtor, which may further impair such debtor’s ability or willingness to service its debts on a timely basis. Holders of government debt, potentially including the Fund, may be requested to participate in the rescheduling of such debt and to extend further loans to government debtors.
As a result of the foregoing, a government obligor may default on its obligations. If such an event occurs, the Fund may have limited legal recourse against the issuer and/or guarantor. Remedies must, in some cases, be pursued in the courts of the defaulting party itself, and the ability of the holder of foreign government debt securities to obtain recourse may be subject to the political climate in the relevant country.
Risks of Other Derivative Instruments. The Fund may utilize options, forward contracts, futures contracts and options on futures contracts. These instruments involve risks, including the imperfect correlation between the value of such instruments and the underlying assets, the possible default by the counterparty to the transaction (i.e., counterparty risk), illiquidity of the derivative instrument and, to the extent the prediction as to certain market movements is incorrect, the risk that the use of such instruments could result in losses greater than if they had not been used. In addition, transactions in such instruments may involve commissions and other costs, which may increase the Fund’s expenses and reduce its return. Amounts paid as premiums and cash or other assets held in margin accounts with
respect to such instruments are not otherwise available to the Fund for investment purposes.
Further, the use of such instruments by the Fund could create the possibility that losses on the instrument would be greater than gains in the value of the Fund’s position. In addition, futures and options markets could be illiquid in some circumstances, and certain over-the-counter options could have no markets. As a result, in certain markets, the Fund might not be able to close out a position without incurring substantial losses. To the extent that the Fund utilizes forward contracts, futures contracts or options transactions for hedging, such transactions should tend to minimize the risk of loss due to a decline in the value of the hedged position and, at the same time, limit any potential gain to the Fund that might result from an increase in value of the position. In addition, the daily variation margin requirements for futures contracts create a greater ongoing potential financial risk than would purchases of call options, in which case the market exposure is limited to the cost of the initial premium and transaction costs. Losses resulting from the use of hedging will reduce the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares, and possibly income, and the losses can be greater than if hedging had not been used. Forward contracts may limit gains on portfolio securities that could otherwise be realized had they not been utilized and could result in losses. The contracts may also increase the Fund’s volatility and may involve a significant amount of risk relative to the investment of cash. The use of put and call options may result in losses to the Fund, force the sale of portfolio securities at inopportune times or for prices other than at current market values, limit the amount of appreciation the Fund can realize on its investments or cause the Fund to hold a security it might otherwise sell. The Fund will be subject to credit risk with respect to the counterparties to any transactions in options, forward contracts, futures contracts or options on futures contracts. If a counterparty becomes bankrupt or otherwise fails to perform its obligations under a derivative contract due to financial difficulties, the Fund may experience significant delays in obtaining any recovery under the derivative contract in bankruptcy or other reorganization proceeding. The Fund may obtain only a limited recovery or may obtain no recovery in such circumstances.
When conducted outside the United States, transactions in options, forward contracts, futures contracts or options on futures contracts may not be regulated as rigorously as in the United States, may not involve a clearing mechanism and related guarantees, and are subject to the risk of governmental actions affecting trading in, or the prices of, foreign securities, currencies and other instruments. The value of such positions also could be adversely affected by: (i) other complex foreign political, legal and economic factors; (ii) lesser availability than in the United States of data on which to make trading decisions; (iii) delays in the Fund’s ability to act upon economic events occurring in foreign markets during non-business hours in the United States; (iv)
the imposition of different exercise and settlement terms and procedures and margin requirements than in the United States; and (v) lower trading volume and liquidity.
In October 2020, the SEC adopted Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act governing a registered investment company’s use of derivatives, short sales, reverse repurchase agreements, and certain other instruments. Under Rule 18f-4, a fund’s derivatives exposure is limited through a value-at-risk test and requires the adoption and implementation of a derivatives risk management program for certain derivatives users. However, subject to certain conditions, funds that do not invest heavily in derivatives may be deemed limited derivatives users and would not be subject to the full requirements of Rule 18f-4. Under the rule, when the Fund trades reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions, including certain tender option bonds, it needs to aggregate the amount of indebtedness associated with the reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions with the aggregate amount of any other senior securities representing indebtedness when calculating the Fund’s asset coverage ratio or treat all such transactions as derivatives transactions. In addition, under the rule, the Fund is permitted to invest in a security on a when-issued or forward-settling basis, or with a non-standard settlement cycle, and the transaction will be deemed not to involve a senior security (as defined under Section 18(g) of the 1940 Act), provided that, (i) the Fund intends to physically settle the transaction and (ii) the transaction will settle within 35 days of its trade date (the “Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision”). The Fund may otherwise engage in when-issued, forward-settling and non-standard settlement cycle securities transactions that do not meet the conditions of the Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision so long as the Fund treats any such transaction as a “derivatives transaction” for purposes of compliance with the rule. Furthermore, under the rule, the Fund is permitted to enter into an unfunded commitment agreement, and such unfunded commitment agreement will not be subject to the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act, if the Fund reasonably believes, at the time it enters into such agreement, that it will have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect to all such agreements as they come due. These requirements may limit the ability of the Fund to use derivatives, and reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions as part of its investment strategies. These requirements may increase the cost of the Fund’s investments and cost of doing business, which could adversely affect investors.
Lender Liability Risk. A number of US judicial decisions have upheld judgments for borrowers against lending institutions on the basis of various evolving legal theories, collectively termed “lender liability.” Generally, lender liability is founded on the premise that a lender has violated a duty (whether implied or contractual) of good faith, commercial reasonableness and fair dealing, or a similar duty owed to
the borrower or has assumed an excessive degree of control over the borrower resulting in the creation of a fiduciary duty owed to the borrower or its other creditors or shareholders. Because of the nature of its investments, the Fund may be subject to allegations of lender liability.
In addition, under common law principles that in some cases form the basis for lender liability claims, if a lender or bondholder (a) intentionally takes an action that results in the undercapitalization of a borrower to the detriment of other creditors of such borrower, (b) engages in other inequitable conduct to the detriment of such other creditors, (c) engages in fraud with respect to, or makes misrepresentations to, such other creditors or (d) uses its influence as a stockholder to dominate or control a borrower to the detriment of other creditors of such borrower, a court may elect to subordinate the claim of the offending lender or bondholder to the claims of the disadvantaged creditor or creditors, a remedy called “equitable subordination.”
Because affiliates of, or persons related to, the Advisers may hold equity or other interests in obligors of the Fund, the Fund could be exposed to claims for equitable subordination or lender liability or both based on such equity or other holdings.
NAV Discount Risk. Frequently, shares of closed-end investment companies, such as the Fund, trade at a price below their NAV, commonly referred to as a “discount.” Historically, shares of closed-end funds have traded at a discount to their NAV, and the Fund can provide no assurance that its Common Shares will trade at or above their NAV. The Fund’s Common Shares frequently trade at a discount to NAV.
Manager Risk. As with any managed fund, the Advisers may not be successful in selecting the best-performing investments or investment techniques in managing the Fund’s portfolio, and the Fund’s performance may lag behind that of similar funds.
Conflicts of Interest Risk. The portfolio managers' management of “other accounts” may give rise to potential conflicts of interest in connection with their management of a Fund's investments, on the one hand, and the investments of the other accounts, on the other. The other accounts may have the same investment objective as the Fund. Therefore, a potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the identical investment objectives, whereby the portfolio manager could favor one account over another. However, the Adviser (and Sub-Adviser) believes that these risks are mitigated by the fact that: (i) accounts with like investment strategies managed by a particular portfolio manager are generally managed in a similar fashion, subject to exceptions to account for particular investment restrictions or policies applicable only to certain accounts, differences in cash flows and account sizes, and similar factors; and (ii) portfolio manager personal trading is monitored to avoid potential conflicts. In
addition, the Adviser (and Sub-Adviser) has adopted trade allocation procedures that require equitable allocation of trade orders for a particular security among participating accounts. In some cases, another account managed by the same portfolio manager may compensate abrdn based on the performance of the portfolio held by that account. The existence of such a performance-based fee may create additional conflicts of interest for the portfolio manager in the allocation of management time, resources and investment opportunities.
Another potential conflict could include instances in which securities considered as investments for the Fund also may be appropriate for other investment accounts managed by the Adviser or its affiliates. Whenever decisions are made to buy or sell securities by the Fund and one or more of the other accounts simultaneously, the Adviser (and/or Sub-Adviser) may aggregate the purchases and sales of the securities and will allocate the securities transactions in a manner that it believes to be equitable under the circumstances. As a result of the allocations, there may be instances where the Fund will not participate in a transaction that is allocated among other accounts. While these aggregation and allocation policies could have a detrimental effect on the price or amount of the securities available to the Fund from time to time, it is the opinion of the Adviser (or Sub-Adviser) that the benefits from the policies outweigh any disadvantage that may arise from exposure to simultaneous transactions. The Trust has adopted policies that are designed to eliminate or minimize conflicts of interest, although there is no guarantee that procedures adopted under such policies will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.
From time to time, the Adviser and/or the Sub-adviser may seed proprietary accounts for the purpose of evaluating a new investment strategy that eventually may be available to clients through one or more product structures. Such accounts also may serve the purpose of establishing a performance record for the strategy. The management by the Adviser and/or the Sub-adviser of accounts with proprietary interests and nonproprietary client accounts may create an incentive to favor the proprietary accounts in the allocation of investment opportunities, and the timing and aggregation of investments. The Adviser's and Sub-adviser's proprietary seed accounts may include long-short strategies, and certain client strategies may permit short sales. A conflict of interest arises if a security is sold short at the same time as a long position, and continuous short selling in a security may adversely affect the stock price of the same security held long in client accounts. The Adviser and Sub-adviser have adopted various policies to mitigate these conflicts.
In addition, the 1940 Act limits the Fund's ability to enter into certain transactions with certain affiliates of the Advisers. As a result of these restrictions, the Fund may be prohibited from buying or selling any
security directly from or to any portfolio company of a fund managed by the Advisers or one of their affiliates. Nonetheless, the Fund may under certain circumstances purchase any such portfolio company's loans or securities in the secondary market, which could create a conflict for the Advisers between the interests of the Fund and the portfolio company, in that the ability of the Advisers to recommend actions in the best interest of the Fund might be impaired. The 1940 Act also prohibits certain “joint” transactions with certain of the Fund's affiliates (which could include other abrdn-managed Funds), which could be deemed to include certain types of investments, or restructuring of investments, in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different times). These limitations may limit the scope of investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to the Fund. The Board has approved policies and procedures reasonably designed to monitor potential conflicts of interest. The Board will review these procedures and any conflicts that may arise.
The Adviser (or Sub-adviser) or their respective members, officers, directors, employees, principals or affiliates may come into possession of material, non-public information. The possession of such information may limit the ability of the Fund to buy or sell a security or otherwise to participate in an investment opportunity. Situations may occur where the Fund could be disadvantaged because of the investment activities conducted by the Adviser (and Sub-adviser) for other clients, and the Adviser (or Sub-adviser) will not employ information barriers with regard to its operations on behalf of its registered and private funds, or other accounts. In certain circumstances, employees of the Adviser (or Sub-adviser) may serve as board members or in other capacities for portfolio or potential portfolio companies, which could restrict the Fund's ability to trade in the securities of such companies.
Repurchase Agreements and Reverse Repurchase Agreements Risk. The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements. In its purchase of repurchase agreements, the Fund does not bear the risk of a decline in the value of the underlying security unless the seller defaults under its repurchase obligation. In the event of the bankruptcy or other default of a seller of a repurchase agreement, the Fund could experience both delays in liquidating the underlying securities and losses, including possible decline in the value of the underlying security during the period while the Fund seeks to enforce its rights thereto, possible lack of access to income on the underlying security during this period, and expenses of enforcing its rights. A repurchase agreement effectively represents a loan from the Fund to the seller under the agreement.
The Fund’s use of reverse repurchase agreements involves many of the same risks involved in the Fund’s use of financial leverage, as the proceeds from reverse repurchase agreements generally will be invested in additional securities. There is a risk that the market value of the securities acquired in the reverse repurchase agreement may
decline below the price of the securities that the Fund has sold but remains obligated to repurchase. In addition, there is a risk that the market value of the securities retained by the Fund may decline. If the buyer of securities under a reverse repurchase agreement were to file for bankruptcy or experience insolvency, the Fund may be adversely affected. Also, in entering into reverse repurchase agreements, the Fund would bear the risk of loss to the extent that the proceeds of the reverse repurchase agreement are less than the value of the underlying securities. In addition, due to the interest costs associated with reverse repurchase agreements, the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares will decline, and, in some cases, the investment performance of the Fund would be less favorable than it would have been if the Fund had not used such instruments. A reverse repurchase agreement effectively represents a loan from the buyer to the Fund under the agreement.
Cybersecurity Risk. Cybersecurity incidents may allow an unauthorized party to gain access to Fund assets, customer data (including private shareholder information), or proprietary information, or cause the Fund, the Adviser and/or its service providers (including, but not limited to, Fund accountants, custodians, sub-custodians, transfer agents and financial intermediaries) to suffer data breaches, data corruption or lose operational functionality.
Other Risks
Investment risk. You may lose money by investing in the Fund, including the possibility that you may lose all of your investment. An investment in the Fund is not a deposit in a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency.
The Fund is intended to be a long-term investment vehicle and is not designed to provide investors with a means of speculating on short-term stock market movements. Investors should not consider the Fund a complete investment program.
Risks of investing in other investment companies. The Fund may acquire shares in other investment companies, including foreign investment companies to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. The market value of the shares of other investment companies may differ from the NAV of the particular fund. As a shareholder in an investment company, the Fund would bear its ratable share of that entity’s expenses, including its investment advisory and administration fees. At the same time, the Fund would continue to pay its own investment advisory fees and other expenses. As a result, the Fund and its Common Shareholders, in effect, will be absorbing two levels of fees with respect to investments in other investment companies.
Zero coupon securities risk. Certain debt obligations purchased by the Fund may take the form of zero coupon bonds. A zero coupon bond is a bond that does not pay interest either for the entire life of the obligation or for an initial period after the issuance of the obligation. When held to its maturity, its return comes from the difference between the purchase price and its maturity value. A zero coupon bond is normally issued and traded at a deep discount from face value. Zero coupon bonds allow an issuer to avoid or delay the need to generate cash to meet current interest payments and, as a result, may involve greater credit risk than bonds that pay interest currently or in cash. The Fund would be required to distribute the income on any of these instruments as it accrues, even though the Fund will not receive all of the income on a current basis or in cash. Thus, the Fund may have to sell other investments, including when it may not be advisable to do so, to make income distributions to its shareholders.
Distributions attributable to the Fund’s “original issue discount” income accruing on zero coupon bonds, and of all other ordinary income, will generally be taxable to the Common Shareholders as ordinary income. As a consequence of selling investments in order to make distributions of “original issue discount” income and other income in respect of which the Fund has not received a corresponding amount of cash, the Fund may realize additional income that gives rise to additional distribution requirements; distributions of such additional income may be taxable to the Common Shareholders as ordinary income or as long-term capital gain depending on which investments are sold.
Inflation risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be worth less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. To the extent that inflation occurs, it will reduce the real value of dividends paid by the Fund and the Fund’s Common Shares. Most emerging market countries, in particular, have experienced substantial, and in some periods extremely high and volatile, rates of inflation. Inflation and rapid fluctuations in inflation rates have had and may continue to have very negative effects on the economies and securities markets globally. In an attempt to control inflation, wage and price controls have been imposed at times in certain countries.
When-issued and delayed delivery securities risk. The Fund may purchase and sell securities on a “when-issued” or “delayed delivery” basis whereby the Fund buys or sells a security with payment and delivery taking place in the future. These transactions are subject to market risk as the value or yield of a security at delivery may be more or less than the purchase price or the yield generally available on securities when delivery occurs. In addition, the Fund is subject to counterparty risk because it relies on the buyer or seller, as the case may be, to consummate the transaction, and failure by the other party to complete the transaction may result in the Fund missing the
opportunity of obtaining a price or yield considered to be advantageous. When the Fund is the buyer in such a transaction, however, it will segregate cash and/or liquid securities having an aggregate value at least equal to the amount of such purchase commitments until payment is made. An increase in the percentage of the Fund’s assets committed to the purchase of securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis may increase the volatility of the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares.
Illiquid investments risk. The Fund’s investments in relatively illiquid investments and loans may restrict the ability of the Fund to dispose of its investments in a timely fashion and for fair value, as well as its ability to fairly value such investments and take advantage of market opportunities. The risks associated with illiquidity will be particularly acute in situations in which the Fund’s operations require cash, such as when the Fund pays dividends or distributions, and could result in the Fund borrowing to meet short-term cash requirements or incurring capital losses on the sale of illiquid investments.
Short sales risk. The Fund may engage in short sales. Short sales involve certain risks and special considerations. If the Fund incorrectly predicts that the price of the borrowed security will decline, the Fund will have to replace the securities with securities with a greater value than the amount received from the sale. As a result, losses from short sales differ from losses that could be incurred from a purchase of a security, because losses from short sales may be unlimited, whereas losses from purchases can equal only the total amount invested.
Equity securities risk. The value of equity securities, including common stock, preferred stock and convertible stock, will fluctuate in response to factors affecting the particular company, as well as broader market and economic conditions. An adverse event, such as an unfavorable earnings report, may depress the value of an issuer’s equity securities held by the Fund. The prices of equity securities fluctuate for several reasons, including changes in investors’ perceptions of the financial condition of an issuer or the general condition of the relevant market, or when political or economic events affecting the issuer occur. In addition, equity security prices may be particularly sensitive to interest rates fluctuations, as the cost of capital and borrowing costs change. Moreover, in the event of a company’s bankruptcy, claims of certain creditors, including bondholders, will have priority over claims of common stock holders and are likely to have varying types of priority over holders of preferred and convertible stock.
Warrants risk. The Fund may invest in warrants. The risk of investing in a warrant is that the warrant may expire prior to the market value of the common stock exceeding the price fixed by the warrant. Warrants have a subordinate claim on a borrower’s assets compared with Senior Loans. As a result, the values of warrants generally are dependent on the financial condition of the borrower and less
dependent on fluctuations in interest rates than are the values of many debt securities. The values of warrants may be more volatile than those of Senior Loans and this may increase the volatility of the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares.
Temporary investments risk. During periods in which the Advisers believe that changes in economic, financial or political conditions make it advisable to do so, the Fund may, for temporary defensive purposes, reduce its primary investment holdings and invest in certain short-term and medium-term debt securities or hold cash. The Fund intends to invest for temporary defensive purposes only in short-term and medium-term debt securities believed to be of high quality, which are expected to be subject to relatively low risk of loss of interest or principal. In taking such defensive position, the Fund temporarily would not be pursuing and may not achieve its investment objectives.
Tax risk. The Fund has elected to be treated as, and intends to continue to qualify each year as, a “regulated investment company” under the Code. Assuming the Fund qualifies as a regulated investment company, it generally will not be subject to US federal income tax on its “investment company taxable income” as that term is defined in the Code (which includes, among other items, dividends, taxable interest, original issue discount, market discount and the excess of any net short-term capital gains over net long-term capital losses, as reduced by certain deductible expenses), and net capital gain, that it distributes (including amounts that are treated as distributed and reinvested pursuant to the Plan, as described below) to shareholders, provided that, for each taxable year, the Fund distributes (or is treated as distributing) to its shareholders an amount at least equal to 90% of its investment company taxable income. The Fund intends to continue to distribute annually all or substantially all of its investment company taxable income and net capital gain. In order for the Fund to qualify as a regulated investment company in any taxable year, the Fund must also meet certain asset diversification tests and at least 90% of its gross income for such year must be comprised of certain types of qualifying income. If, for any taxable year, the Fund does not qualify as a regulated investment company, it will be treated as a corporation subject to US federal income tax on its net income and capital gains at the regular corporate tax rates (without a deduction for distributions to shareholders). In addition, shareholders will be subject to tax on distributions to the extent of the Fund’s current or accumulated earnings and profits. Accordingly, in such event, the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objectives would be adversely affected, and Common Shareholders would be subject to the risk of diminished investment returns.
Valuation risk. Unlike publicly traded common stock which trades on national exchanges, there is no central place or exchange for loans or fixed-income instruments to trade. Loans and fixed-income
instruments generally trade on an “over-the-counter” market which may be anywhere in the world where the buyer and seller can settle on a price. Due to the lack of centralized information and trading, the valuation of loans or fixed-income instruments may carry more risk than that of common stock. Uncertainties in the conditions of the financial market, unreliable reference data, lack of transparency and inconsistency of valuation models and processes may lead to inaccurate asset pricing. In addition, other market participants may value securities differently than the Fund. As a result, the Fund may be subject to the risk that when a loan or fixed-income instrument is sold in the market, the amount received by the Fund is less than the value of such loans or fixed-income instruments carried on the Fund’s books.
US government debt securities risk. US government debt securities have historically not involved the credit risks associated with investments in other types of debt securities, although, as a result, the yields available from US government debt securities are generally lower than the yields available from other securities. Like other debt securities, however, the values of US government securities change as interest rates fluctuate. Fluctuations in the value of portfolio securities will not affect interest income on existing portfolio securities but will be reflected in the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares. Since the magnitude of these fluctuations will generally be greater at times when the Fund’s average maturity is longer, under certain market conditions the Fund may, for temporary defensive purposes, accept lower current income from short-term investments rather than investing in higher yielding long-term securities.
Operational Risk. Your ability to transact with the Fund or the valuation of your investment may be negatively impacted because of the operational risks arising from factors such as processing errors and human errors, inadequate or failed internal or external processes, failures in systems and technology, changes in personnel, and errors caused by third-party service providers or trading counterparties. Although the Fund attempts to minimize such failures through controls and oversight, it is not possible to identify all of the operational risks that may affect the Fund or to develop processes and controls that completely eliminate or mitigate the occurrence of such failures. The Fund and its shareholders could be negatively impacted as a result.
Government intervention in the financial markets risk. In the past decade financial markets throughout the world have experienced increased volatility, depressed valuations, decreased liquidity and heightened uncertainty. Governmental and non-governmental issuers have defaulted on, or been forced to restructure, their debts. Federal Reserve or other US or non-US governmental or central bank actions, including interest rate increases or contrary actions by different governments, could negatively affect financial markets
generally, increase market volatility and reduce the value and liquidity of securities in which the fund invests.
Federal, state, and other governments, their regulatory agencies or self-regulatory organizations may take additional actions that affect the regulation of the securities or structured products in which the Fund invests, or the issuers of such securities or structured products, in ways that are unforeseeable. Borrowers under Senior Loans held by the Fund may seek protection under bankruptcy laws. Legislation or regulation may also change the way in which the Fund itself is regulated. Such legislation or regulation could limit or preclude the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objectives. The Advisers monitor developments and seek to manage the Fund’s portfolio in a manner consistent with achieving the Fund’s investment objectives, but there can be no assurance that they will be successful in doing so.
Anti-takeover provisions. The Fund’s Agreement and Declaration of Trust and By-Laws include provisions that could limit the ability of other entities or persons to acquire control of the Fund or convert the Fund to open-end status and delay or limit the ability of other persons to acquire control of the Fund. These provisions could deprive the Common Shareholders of opportunities to sell their Common Shares at a premium over the then-current market price of the Common Shares or at NAV. The Fund’s Board has determined that these provisions are in the best interests of shareholders generally.
ESG Integration Risk. To the extent the ESG factors are used to evaluate investments, the consideration of such factors may adversely affect the Fund’s performance. Not every ESG factor may be identified or evaluated for every investment. ESG characteristics may not be the only factors considered and, as a result, the issuers in which the Fund invests may not be issuers with favorable ESG characteristics or high ESG ratings. The application of ESG factors may result in the Fund performing differently than its benchmark index and other funds in its peer group that do not consider ESG factors or consider different ESG factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of Leverage [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of Leverage
The following table is furnished in response to requirements of the SEC. It is designed to, among other things, illustrate the effects of leverage through the use of senior securities, as that term is defined under Section 18 of the 1940 Act, on Common Share total return, assuming investment portfolio total returns (consisting of income and changes in the value of investments held in a Fund's portfolio) of -10%, -5%, 0%, 5% and 10%. The table below reflects the Fund's continued use of the revolving credit facility, and Preferred Shares as of October 31, 2024 as a percentage of total managed assets (including assets attributable to such leverage), the estimated annual effective Preferred Share dividend rate and interest expense rate payable by the Fund on such instruments (based on market conditions as of October 31, 2024), and the annual return that the Fund's portfolio must experience (net of expenses) in order to cover such costs. The information below does not reflect the Fund's use of certain other forms of economic leverage achieved through the use of other instruments or transactions not considered to be senior securities under the 1940 Act, such as covered credit default swaps or other derivative instruments, if any.
The assumed investment portfolio returns in the table below are hypothetical figures and are not necessarily indicative of the investment portfolio returns experienced or expected to be experienced by the Fund. Your actual returns may be greater or less than those appearing below. In addition, actual borrowing expenses
associated with reverse repurchase agreements (or dollar rolls or borrowings, if any) used by the Fund may vary frequently and may be significantly higher or lower than the rate used for the example below.
Assumed annual returns on the Fund's portfolio (net of expenses) |
(10%) |
(5%) |
0% |
5% |
10% |
Corresponding return of shareholder |
(15.5%) |
(8.8%) |
(2.1%) |
4.6% |
11.3% |
Based on estimated indebtedness of $280,000,000 (representing approximately 25.64% of the Fund's Managed Assets as of October 31, 2024), and a weighted average annual interest rate of 6.15% (effective weighted interest rate on the revolving credit facility and preferred shares as of October 31, 2024), the Fund's investment portfolio at fair value would have to produce an annual return of approximately 1.57% to cover annual interest payments on the estimated debt.
Share total return is composed of two elements—the distributions paid by a Fund to holders of Shares (the amount of which is largely
determined by the net investment income of the Fund after paying dividend payments on any preferred shares issued by the Fund and expenses on any forms of leverage outstanding) and gains or losses on the value of the securities and other instruments the Fund owns. As required by SEC rules, the table assumes that a Fund is more likely to suffer capital losses than to enjoy capital appreciation. For example, to assume a total return of 0%, a Fund must assume that the income it receives on its investments is entirely offset by losses in the value of those investments. This table reflects hypothetical performance of a Fund's portfolio and not the actual performance of the Fund's Shares, the value of which is determined by market forces and other factors.
Should the Fund elect to add additional leverage to its portfolio, any benefits of such additional leverage cannot be fully achieved until the proceeds resulting from the use of such leverage have been received by the Fund and invested in accordance with the Fund's investment objective and policies. As noted above, the Fund's willingness to use additional leverage, and the extent to which leverage is used at any time, will depend on many factors, including, among other things, the Adviser's assessment of the yield curve environment, interest rate trends, market conditions and other factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Dividend Payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ (1.2)
|
|
(1.2)
|
|
(1.2)
|
|
(1.2)
|
|
(1.4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Interest Rate [Percent] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.15%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of Leverage [Table Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed annual returns on the Fund's portfolio (net of expenses) |
(10%) |
(5%) |
0% |
5% |
10% |
Corresponding return of shareholder |
(15.5%) |
(8.8%) |
(2.1%) |
4.6% |
11.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return at Minus Ten [Percent] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.50%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return at Minus Five [Percent] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.80%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return at Zero [Percent] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.10%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return at Plus Five [Percent] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.60%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return at Plus Ten [Percent] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.30%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of Leverage, Purpose [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table is furnished in response to requirements of the SEC. It is designed to, among other things, illustrate the effects of leverage through the use of senior securities, as that term is defined under Section 18 of the 1940 Act, on Common Share total return, assuming investment portfolio total returns (consisting of income and changes in the value of investments held in a Fund's portfolio) of -10%, -5%, 0%, 5% and 10%. The table below reflects the Fund's continued use of the revolving credit facility, and Preferred Shares as of October 31, 2024 as a percentage of total managed assets (including assets attributable to such leverage), the estimated annual effective Preferred Share dividend rate and interest expense rate payable by the Fund on such instruments (based on market conditions as of October 31, 2024), and the annual return that the Fund's portfolio must experience (net of expenses) in order to cover such costs. The information below does not reflect the Fund's use of certain other forms of economic leverage achieved through the use of other instruments or transactions not considered to be senior securities under the 1940 Act, such as covered credit default swaps or other derivative instruments, if any.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Price [Table Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYSE Market Price(1) |
NAV at NYSE Market Price(1) |
Market Premium/(Discount) to NAV on Date of NYSE Market Price(1) |
Quarter Ended (2) |
High |
Low |
High |
Low |
High |
Low |
October 31, 2024 |
$ 6.64 |
$ 6.30 |
$ 6.65 |
$ 6.55 |
-0.15% |
-3.82% |
July 31, 2024 |
$ 6.99 |
$ 6.48 |
$ 6.83 |
$ 6.62 |
2.34% |
-2.11% |
April 30, 2024 |
$ 7.04 |
$ 6.46 |
$ 7.12 |
$ 6.70 |
-1.12% |
-3.58% |
January 31, 2024 |
$7.00 |
$ 5.89 |
$ 7.05 |
$ 6.51 |
-0.71% |
-9.52% |
October 31, 2023 |
$ 7.15 |
$ 5.62 |
$ 6.96 |
$ 6.47 |
2.73% |
-13.14% |
July 31, 2023 |
$ 6.98 |
$ 6.46 |
$ 7.06 |
$ 6.80 |
-0.43% |
-5.00% |
April 30, 2023 |
$ 8.50 |
$ 6.45 |
$ 7.38 |
$ 6.89 |
16.28% |
-6.66% |
January 31, 2023 |
$ 8.21 |
$ 6.32 |
$ 7.34 |
$ 6.65 |
12.16% |
-4.96% |
October 31, 2022 |
$ 8.72 |
$ 6.16 |
$ 7.80 |
$ 6.54 |
12.81% |
-5.81% |
July 31, 2022 |
$ 9.33 |
$ 7.57 |
$ 8.74 |
$ 7.11 |
6.75% |
3.13% |
April 30, 2022 |
$ 10.51 |
$ 9.34 |
$ 10.01 |
$ 8.80 |
7.68% |
2.64% |
January 31, 2022 |
$ 11.45 |
$ 9.62 |
$10.53 |
$ 9.94 |
8.94% |
-4.47% |
(1) Source: Bloomberg L.P.
(2) Data presented are with respect to a short period of time and are not indicative of future performance.
On December 17, 2024, the Fund’s NAV was $6.48 and the last reported sale price of a Common Share on the NYSE was $5.93, representing a discount to NAV of 8.49%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowest Price or Bid |
|
|
6.3
|
[8],[9] |
$ 6.48
|
$ 6.46
|
$ 5.89
|
5.62
|
[8],[9] |
$ 6.46
|
$ 6.45
|
$ 6.32
|
6.16
|
[8],[9] |
$ 7.57
|
$ 9.34
|
$ 9.62
|
$ 5.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highest Price or Bid |
|
|
6.64
|
[8],[9] |
6.99
|
7.04
|
7
|
7.15
|
[8],[9] |
6.98
|
8.5
|
8.21
|
8.72
|
[8],[9] |
9.33
|
10.51
|
11.45
|
7.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowest Price or Bid, NAV |
|
|
6.55
|
[8],[9] |
6.62
|
6.7
|
6.51
|
6.47
|
[8],[9] |
6.8
|
6.89
|
6.65
|
6.54
|
[8],[9] |
7.11
|
8.8
|
9.94
|
6.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highest Price or Bid, NAV |
|
|
$ 6.65
|
[8],[9] |
$ 6.83
|
$ 7.12
|
$ 7.05
|
$ 6.96
|
[8],[9] |
$ 7.06
|
$ 7.38
|
$ 7.34
|
$ 7.8
|
[8],[9] |
$ 8.74
|
$ 10.01
|
$ 10.53
|
$ 7.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highest Price or Bid, Premium (Discount) to NAV [Percent] |
|
|
(0.15%)
|
[8],[9] |
2.34%
|
(1.12%)
|
(0.71%)
|
2.73%
|
[8],[9] |
(0.43%)
|
16.28%
|
12.16%
|
12.81%
|
[8],[9] |
6.75%
|
7.68%
|
8.94%
|
3.71%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lowest Price or Bid, Premium (Discount) to NAV [Percent] |
|
|
(3.82%)
|
[8],[9] |
(2.11%)
|
(3.58%)
|
(9.52%)
|
(13.14%)
|
[8],[9] |
(5.00%)
|
(6.66%)
|
(4.96%)
|
(5.81%)
|
[8],[9] |
3.13%
|
2.64%
|
(4.47%)
|
(9.52%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Price |
|
$ 5.93
|
$ 6.49
|
|
|
|
|
$ 5.78
|
|
|
|
|
$ 6.37
|
|
|
|
|
$ 6.49
|
|
5.78
|
|
6.37
|
|
11.3
|
|
9.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV Per Share |
|
$ 6.48
|
$ 6.53
|
|
|
|
|
$ 6.52
|
|
|
|
|
$ 6.72
|
|
|
|
|
$ 6.53
|
|
$ 6.52
|
|
$ 6.72
|
|
$ 10.45
|
|
$ 10.15
|
$ 12.46
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Premium (Discount) to NAV [Percent] |
|
8.49%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.61%)
|
|
(11.35%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Securities [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Stock [Table Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Capital
The Fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares of beneficial interest at par value $0.001 per common share. As of October 31, 2024, there were 125,470,678 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
Offering costs incurred through October 31, 2024 as a result of the Fund’s Registration Statement effective with the SEC on May 30, 2024 are approximately $74,286. Associated offering costs with offerings made under such registration statement will be capitalized at the time of share issuance. The Statement of Assets and Liabilities reflects the remaining offering costs of $74,286 as deferred offering costs. Offering costs of $107,729 incurred through the Fund's previous Registration Statement were expensed to the Fund upon expiration
and are included in the Statement of Operations under line item Shelf Registration and At-The-Market offering expenses.
Additional shares of the Fund may be issued under certain circumstances, including pursuant to the Fund's Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase Plan. Additional information concerning the Automatic Dividend Reinvestment Plan is included within this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Risk. Market risk is the possibility that the market values of securities owned by the Fund will decline. The values of fixed income securities tend to fall as interest rates rise, and such declines tend to be greater among fixed income securities with longer remaining maturities. Market risk is often greater among certain types of fixed income securities, such as zero coupon bonds which do not make regular interest payments but are instead bought at a discount to their face values and paid in full upon maturity. As interest rates change, these securities often fluctuate more in price than securities that make regular interest payments and therefore subject the Fund to greater market risk than a fund that does not own these types of securities. The values of adjustable, variable or floating rate income securities tend to have less fluctuation in response to changes in interest rates, but will have some fluctuation particularly when the next interest rate adjustment on such security is further away in time or adjustments are limited in number or degree over time. The Fund has no policy limiting the maturity of credit obligations it purchases. Such obligations often have mandatory and optional prepayment provisions and because of prepayments, the actual remaining maturity of loans and debts may be considerably less than their stated maturity. Obligations with longer remaining maturities or durations generally expose the Fund to more market risk. When-issued and delayed delivery transactions are subject to changes in market conditions from the time of the commitment until settlement. This may adversely affect the prices or yields of the securities being purchased. The greater the Fund’s outstanding commitments for these securities, the greater the Fund’s exposure to market price fluctuations. Interest rate risk can be considered a type of market risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk. Credit risk refers to the possibility that the issuer of a security will be unable to make timely interest payments and/or repay the principal on its debt. Because the Fund may invest, without limitation, in securities that are below investment grade, the Fund is subject to a greater degree of credit risk than a fund investing primarily in investment grade securities. Below investment grade securities (that is, securities rated Ba or lower by Moody’s or BB or lower by S&P) are commonly referred to as “junk” securities. Generally, lower-grade securities provide a higher yield than higher-grade securities of similar maturity but are subject to greater risks, such as greater credit risk, greater market risk and volatility, greater liquidity concerns and potentially greater manager risk. Such securities are generally regarded as predominantly speculative with
respect to the issuers’ capacities to pay interest or repay principal in accordance with their terms. Lower-grade securities are more susceptible to non-payment of interest and principal and default than higher-grade securities and are more sensitive to specific issuer developments or real or perceived general adverse economic changes than higher-grade securities. The market for lower-grade securities may also have less information available than the market for other securities, further complicating evaluations and valuations of such securities and placing more emphasis on the experience, judgment and analysis of the Advisers.
Credit obligations of stressed and distressed issuers (including those that are in covenant or payment default) are subject to a multitude of legal, industry, market, economic and governmental forces each of which make analysis of these companies inherently difficult. The Advisers rely on company management, outside experts, market research and personal experience to analyze potential investments. There can be no assurance that any of these sources will provide credible information, or that the Advisers’ analysis will produce conclusions that lead to profitable investments. Obligations of stressed and distressed issuers generally trade significantly below par and are considered speculative. The repayment of defaulted obligations is subject to significant uncertainties. Defaulted obligations might be repaid only after lengthy workout or bankruptcy proceedings or result in only partial recovery of cash payments or an exchange of the defaulted obligation for other debt or equity securities of the issuer or its affiliates, which may in turn be illiquid or speculative. There are a number of significant risks inherent in the bankruptcy process. Many events in a bankruptcy are the product of contested matters and adversary proceedings and are beyond the control of the creditors. A bankruptcy court may approve actions that would be contrary to the interests of the Fund. A bankruptcy filing by an issuer may cause such issuer to lose its market position and key employees and otherwise become incapable of restoring itself as a viable entity, and its liquidation value may be less than its value was believed to be at the time of investment. In addition, the duration of a bankruptcy proceeding is difficult to predict and, as such, a creditor’s return on investment can be adversely affected by delays while the plan of reorganization is being negotiated, approved by the creditors and confirmed by the bankruptcy court and until it ultimately becomes effective. The administrative costs in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding are frequently high and would be paid out of the debtor’s estate prior to any return to creditors. Further, in the early stages of the bankruptcy process it is often difficult to estimate the extent of any contingent claims that might be made and, as such, there is a risk that the Fund’s influence with respect to the class of obligations it owns could be lost by increases in the number and amount of claims in that class or by different classification and treatment. A creditor, such as the Fund, can also lose its ranking and priority if it is determined that such creditor exercised “domination
and control” over a debtor and other creditors can demonstrate that they have been harmed by such actions. In addition, certain claims have priority by law, such as claims for taxes, which may be substantial and could affect the ability of the Fund to be repaid.
In any investment involving stressed or distressed obligations, there is a risk that the transaction involving such debt obligations will be unsuccessful, take considerable time or will result in a distribution of cash or a new security or obligation in exchange for the stressed or distressed obligations, the value of which may be less than the Fund’s purchase price of such obligations. Furthermore, if an anticipated transaction does not occur, the Fund may be required to sell its investment at a loss. However, investments in equity securities obtained through debt restructurings or bankruptcy proceedings may be illiquid and thus difficult or impossible to sell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate and Income Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate and Income Risk. The income you receive from the Fund is based in large part on interest rates, which can vary widely over the short and long term. In a period of decreasing interest rates, your income from the Fund may decrease as well. The more the Fund invests in adjustable, variable or floating rate securities or in securities susceptible to prepayment risk, the greater the Fund’s income risk. Securities with longer durations are likely to be more sensitive to changes in interest rates, generally making them more volatile than securities with shorter durations. Lower rated fixed income securities have greater volatility because there is less certainty that principal and interest payments will be made as scheduled.
The risks attendant to changing interest rate environments have been, and continue to be, magnified in the current economic environment. To combat rising inflation, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System increased the federal funds rate several times in 2022 and 2023; however, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System decreased the federal funds rate in 2024, and the future of interest rates remains uncertain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment or Call Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment or Call Risk. During periods of declining interest rates, it is possible that issuers of fixed income securities with high interest rates will prepay or “call” their securities before their maturity dates. In this event, the proceeds from the prepaid or called securities would likely be reinvested by the Fund in securities bearing the new, lower interest rates, resulting in a possible decline in the Fund’s income and distributions to shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below Investment Grade (High Yield or Junk Bond) Securities Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below Investment Grade (High-Yield or Junk Bond) Securities Risk. Fixed income securities rated below investment grade generally offer a higher current yield than that available from higher grade issues, but typically involve greater risk. These securities involve a greater risk of default, as they are especially sensitive to adverse changes in general economic conditions, to changes in the financial condition of their issuers and to price fluctuation in response to changes in interest rates. During periods of economic downturn or rising interest rates,
issuers of below investment grade instruments may experience financial stress that could adversely affect their ability to make payments of principal and interest and increase the possibility of default, and such negative impact can be sudden and significant. The secondary market for high-yield securities may not be as liquid as the secondary market for more highly rated securities, a factor which may have an adverse effect on the Fund’s ability to dispose of a particular security. There are fewer dealers in the market for high-yield securities than for investment grade obligations. The prices quoted by different dealers may vary significantly, and the spread between the bid and asked price is generally much larger for high-yield securities than for higher quality instruments. Under continuing adverse market or economic conditions, the secondary market for high-yield securities could contract further, independent of any specific adverse changes in the condition of a particular issuer, and these securities may become illiquid or less valuable even before a default occurs. In addition, adverse publicity and investor perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may also decrease the values and liquidity of below investment grade securities, especially in a market characterized by a low volume of trading. Unrated instruments involve the risk that the Advisers may not accurately evaluate the instrument’s comparative credit rating. As a result, the Fund’s investments in unrated instruments depend more heavily on the Advisers’ credit analysis than if the Fund invested in comparable rated instruments. Some unrated securities may not have an active trading market or may be difficult to value, and the Fund might have difficulty selling them at an acceptable price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of Senior Loans [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of Senior Loans. There is less readily available and reliable information about most Senior Loans than is the case for many other types of instruments, including listed securities. Senior Loans are not listed on any national securities exchange or automated quotation system and as such, many Senior Loans are illiquid, meaning that the Fund may not be able to sell them quickly at a fair price. To the extent that a secondary market does exist for certain Senior Loans, the market is more volatile than for liquid, listed securities and may be subject to irregular trading activity, wide bid/ask spreads and extended trade settlement periods. The market for Senior Loans could be disrupted in the event of an economic downturn or a substantial increase or decrease in interest rates, resulting in fluctuations in the NAV of the Fund’s common shares (“Common Shares”) and difficulty in valuing the Fund’s portfolio of Senior Loans. Although the Advisers believe that the Fund’s investments in adjustable rate Senior Loans could limit fluctuations in the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares as a result of changes in interest rates, extraordinary and sudden changes in interest rates could nevertheless disrupt the market for such Senior Loans and result in fluctuations in the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares and difficulty in valuing the Fund’s portfolio of Senior Loans. Senior Loans, like most other debt obligations, are subject to the risk of default. Default in the payment of interest or principal on a Senior
Loan will result in a reduction of income to the Fund, a reduction in the value of the Senior Loan and a potential decrease in the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares. The risk of default will increase in the event of an economic downturn or a substantial increase in interest rates. The Advisers rely primarily on their own evaluation of borrower credit quality rather than on any available independent sources. As a result, the Fund is particularly dependent on the analytical abilities of the Advisers.
The Fund may acquire or hold Senior Loans of borrowers that are experiencing, or are more likely to experience, financial difficulty, including Senior Loans issued to highly leveraged borrowers or borrowers that have filed for bankruptcy protection. Borrowers may have outstanding debt obligations, including Senior Loans that are rated below investment grade. The Fund may invest a substantial portion of its assets in Senior Loans that are rated below investment grade or that are unrated at the time of purchase but are deemed by the Advisers to be of comparable quality. If a Senior Loan is rated at the time of purchase, the Fund may consider the rating when evaluating the Senior Loan but, in any event, does not view ratings as a determinative factor in investment decisions. As a result, the Fund is dependent on the credit analytical abilities of the Advisers. Because of the protective terms of Senior Loans, the Advisers believe that the Fund is more likely to recover more of its investment in a defaulted Senior Loan than would be the case for most other types of defaulted credit obligations. The values of Senior Loans of borrowers that have filed for bankruptcy protection or that are experiencing payment difficulty could be affected by, among other things, the assessment of the likelihood that the lenders ultimately will receive repayment of the principal amount of such Senior Loans, the likely duration, if any, of a lapse in the scheduled payment of interest and repayment of principal and prevailing interest rates. There is no assurance that the Fund will be able to recover any amount on Senior Loans of such borrowers or that sale of the collateral granted in connection with Senior Loans would raise enough cash to satisfy the borrower’s payment obligation or that the collateral can or will be liquidated. In the event of bankruptcy, liquidation may not occur and the bankruptcy court may not give lenders the full benefit of their senior position in the capital structure of the borrower.
The Fund may act as an original lender under Senior Loans or may acquire Senior Loans through assignments or participations. The Fund may make Senior Loans to, or acquire Senior Loans of, borrowers that, at the time of the making or acquisition of the loan by the Fund, are experiencing, or are likely to experience, financial difficulty (including highly leveraged borrowers) and such loans may constitute a material amount of the Fund’s portfolio. The Fund will not make Senior Loans to, or acquire Senior Loans of, borrowers that, at the time of the making or acquisition of the loan by the Fund, are in bankruptcy.
If the Fund acquires a Senior Loan through an assignment agreement, it will typically succeed to all the rights and obligations of the assigning institution and become a lender under the credit agreement with respect to the debt obligation purchased; however, its rights can be more restricted than those of the assigning institution, and, in any event, the Fund may not be able to unilaterally enforce all rights and remedies of the lenders under the loan agreement and with regard to any associated collateral. If the Fund acquires an interest in a Senior Loan through a participation agreement, the Fund will enter into a contractual relationship with the institution selling the participation, not with the borrower. In purchasing participations, the Fund generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement or any rights of setoff against the borrower, and the Fund may not directly benefit from the collateral supporting the debt obligation in which it has purchased the participation. As a result, the Fund will be exposed to the credit risk of both the borrower and the institution selling the participation. When purchasing a participation, the Advisers will analyze the credit risk posed by the institution selling the participation. The Advisers rely primarily on their own evaluation of the credit quality of such selling institutions rather than on any available independent sources. As a result, the Fund is particularly dependent on the analytical abilities of the Advisers. Because of the nature of its investments, the Fund may be subject to allegations of lender liability and other claims. In addition, the Securities Act deems certain persons to be “underwriters” if they purchase a security from an issuer and later sell it to the public. Although it is not believed that the application of this Securities Act provision would cause the Fund to be engaged in the business of underwriting, a person who purchases an instrument from the Fund that was acquired by the Fund from the issuer of such instrument could allege otherwise. Under the Securities Act, an underwriter may be liable for material omissions or misstatements in an issuer’s registration statement or prospectus.
In certain circumstances, Senior Loans may not be deemed to be securities, and in the event of fraud or misrepresentation by a borrower, lenders and purchasers of interests in loans, such as the Fund, will not have the protection of the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws, as would be the case for bonds or stocks. Instead, in such cases, lenders generally rely on the contractual provisions in the loan agreement itself, and common law fraud protections under applicable state law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage risks [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage risks. The Fund’s leveraged capital structure creates special risks not associated with unleveraged funds having similar investment objectives and policies. The funds borrowed pursuant to the loan facility may constitute a substantial lien and burden by reason of their prior claim against the income of the Fund and against the net assets of the Fund in liquidation. The Fund is limited in its ability to declare dividends or other distributions in the event of default under the loan
facility. In the event of default under the loan facility, the lender has the right to cause a liquidation of the collateral (i.e., sell portfolio securities and other assets of the Fund) and, if any such default is not cured, the lender may be able to control the liquidation as well. The loan facility has a term of 364 days and is not a perpetual form of leverage; there can be no assurance that the loan facility will be available for renewal on acceptable terms, if at all.
The credit agreement governing the loan facility includes usual and customary covenants for this type of transaction. These covenants impose on the Fund asset coverage requirements, Fund composition requirements and limits on certain investments which are more stringent than those imposed on the Fund by the 1940 Act. The covenants or guidelines could impede the Fund’s Adviser or Sub-Adviser from fully managing the Fund’s portfolio in accordance with the Fund’s investment objective and policies. Furthermore, non-compliance with such covenants or the occurrence of other events could lead to the cancellation of the loan facility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenant Lite Loans Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenant Lite Loans Risk. Covenant lite loans contain fewer maintenance covenants than traditional loans, or no maintenance covenants at all, and may not include terms that allow the lender to monitor the financial performance of the borrower and declare a default if certain criteria are breached. This may hinder the Fund’s ability to reprice credit risk associated with the borrower and reduce the Fund’s ability to restructure a problematic loan and mitigate potential loss. As a result, the Fund’s exposure to losses on such investments may be increased, especially during a downturn in the credit cycle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market events risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market events risk. The market values of securities or other assets will fluctuate, sometimes sharply and unpredictably, due to changes in general market conditions, overall economic trends or events, governmental actions or intervention, actions taken by the US Federal Reserve or foreign central banks, market disruptions caused by trade disputes, regional armed conflicts or other factors, political events within the U.S. and abroad, such as changes in the U.S. presidential administration and Congress, investor sentiment and other factors that may or may not be related to the issuer of the security or other asset. Economies and financial markets throughout the world are increasingly interconnected. Economic, financial, political or geopolitical events, trading and tariff arrangements, war, terrorism, natural disasters and other circumstances in one country or region could have profound impacts on global economies or markets. As a result, whether or not the Fund invests in securities of issuers located in or with significant exposure to the countries directly affected, the value and liquidity of the Fund's investments may be negatively affected. In addition, any spread of an infectious illness, public health threat or similar issue could reduce consumer demand or economic output, result in market closures, travel restrictions or quarantines, and generally have a significant impact on the world economy, which
in turn could adversely affect the Fund's investments. The impact of the recent U.S. elections on such policies remains uncertain and policies supported by the new administration (or the reversal of policies supported by the previous administration) could impact U.S. interest rates or inflation or otherwise impact the Fund.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Securities Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Securities Risk. The Fund will invest in credit obligations, including loans, of issuers that are organized or located in countries other than the United States, including non-US dollar denominated securities. Investing in non-US issuers involves risks, including that non-US issuers may be subject to less rigorous accounting and reporting requirements than US issuers, less rigorous regulatory requirements, different legal systems and laws relating to creditors’ rights, the potential inability to enforce legal judgments, the potential for political, social and economic adversity and currency risk. These risks are heightened under adverse economic, market, geopolitical and other conditions.
Currency risk is the risk that fluctuations in the exchange rates between the US dollar and non-US currencies may negatively affect an investment. The value of investments denominated in non-US currencies may fluctuate based on changes in the value of those currencies relative to the US dollar, and a decline in such relative value could reduce the value of such investments held by the Fund.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging Markets [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emerging Markets. The foreign securities in which the Fund may invest may be issued by companies or governments located in emerging market countries. Investing in the securities of issuers operating in emerging markets involves a high degree of risk and special considerations not typically associated with investing in the securities of other foreign or US issuers. Compared to the United States and other developed countries, emerging market countries may have relatively unstable governments, economies which may be more likely to take extra-legal action with respect to companies, industries, assets, or foreign ownership than those in more developed markets and therefore issuers of such emerging markets may be more affected by the performance of such industries or sectors. Emerging market economies may be based on only a few industries and securities markets that trade a small number of securities. Securities issued by companies or governments located in emerging market countries tend to be especially volatile (particularly during market closures due to local market holidays or other reasons) and may be less liquid than securities traded in developed countries. Securities in these countries have been characterized by greater potential loss than securities of companies and governments located in developed countries. Investments in the securities of issuers located in emerging markets could be affected by risks associated with expropriation and/or nationalization, political or social instability, pervasiveness of corruption and crime, armed conflict, the impact on the economy of civil war, religious or ethnic unrest and the withdrawal or non-renewal of any license enabling the Fund to trade
in securities of a particular country, confiscatory taxation, restrictions on transfers of assets, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards, less publicly available financial and other information, diplomatic development which could affect US investments in those countries, and potential difficulties in enforcing contractual obligations. International trade barriers or economic sanctions against foreign countries, organizations, entities and/or individuals in response to geopolitical tensions or conflicts may adversely affect the value of the Fund’s foreign holdings. The type and severity of sanctions and other similar measures are difficult to measure or predict. Emerging market countries generally have less developed legal, accounting and financial reporting systems than those in more developed markets, which may reduce the scope or quality of financial information available to investors. Moreover, it can be more difficult for investors to bring litigation or enforce judgments against issuers in emerging markets or for US regulators to bring enforcement actions against such issuers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Risk. Since the Fund may invest in credit obligations of foreign issuers denominated in the local currency, changes in foreign currency exchange rates will affect the value of credit obligations in the Fund’s portfolio and the unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments. In addition to changes in the value of the Fund’s portfolio investments resulting from currency fluctuations, the Fund may incur costs in connection with conversions between various currencies. The Fund may also invest directly in currencies for hedging purposes. The Fund is subject to the risk that those currencies will decline in value relative to the US dollar. The values of the currencies of the emerging market countries in which the Fund may invest may be subject to a high degree of fluctuation due to changes in interest rates, the effects of monetary policies of the United States, foreign governments, central banks or supranational entities, the imposition of currency controls or due to other national or global political or economic developments. Foreign exchange dealers realize a profit based on the difference between the prices at which they are buying and selling various currencies. Thus, a dealer normally will offer to sell a foreign currency to the Fund at one rate, while offering a lesser rate of exchange should the Fund desire immediately to resell that currency to the dealer. The Fund will conduct its foreign currency exchange transactions either on a spot (i.e., cash) basis at the spot rate prevailing in the foreign currency exchange market, or through entering into forward, futures or options contracts to purchase or sell foreign currencies. Therefore, the Fund’s exposure to foreign currencies may result in reduced returns to the Fund. The Fund may, from time to time, seek to protect the value of some portion or all of its portfolio holdings against currency risks by engaging in currency hedging transactions. Such transactions may include entering into forward currency exchange contracts, currency futures contracts and options on such futures contracts as well as purchasing put or call options on currencies, in US or foreign markets.
Currency hedging involves risks, including possible default by the other party to the transaction, illiquidity and, to the extent the view as to certain market movements is incorrect, the risk that the use of hedging could result in losses greater than if they had not been used. In addition, in certain countries in which the Fund may invest, currency hedging opportunities may not be available. The use of currency transactions can result in the Fund incurring losses because of the imposition of exchange controls, suspension of settlements or the inability of the Fund to deliver or receive a specified currency.
Investing in Euro-denominated (or other European currency-denominated) securities entails risk of being exposed to a currency that may not fully reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the disparate European economies. In addition, it is possible that the Euro could be abandoned in the future by countries that have already adopted its use. The effects of such an abandonment on the applicable country and the rest of the European Economic and Monetary Union (“EMU”) are uncertain but could be negative and severe. Many European countries rely heavily upon export-dependent businesses and any change in the exchange rate between the Euro and the US dollar can have either a positive or a negative effect upon corporate profits and the performance of investments in the European Union. The effects of the collapse of the Euro, or of the exit of one or more countries from the EMU, on the United States and global economy and securities markets are impossible to predict and any such events could have a significant adverse impact on the value and risk profile of the Fund’s portfolio.
The Fund computes and expects to continue to distribute its income in US dollars, and the computation of income is made on the date that the income is earned by the Fund at the foreign exchange rate in effect on that date. If the value of the foreign currencies in which the Fund receives its income falls relative to the US dollar between the date of earning of the income and the time at which the Fund converts the foreign currencies to US dollars, the Fund may be required to liquidate securities in order to make distributions if the Fund has insufficient cash in US dollars to meet distribution requirements. The liquidation of investments, if required, may have an adverse impact on the Fund’s performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of Second Lien or Other Subordinated or Unsecured Loans or Debt [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of Second Lien or Other Subordinated or Unsecured Loans or Debt. Second lien or other subordinated or unsecured loans or debt generally are subject to similar risks as those associated with investments in Senior Loans. In addition, because second lien or other subordinated or unsecured loans or debt are subordinated in payment and/or lower in lien priority to Senior Loans, they are subject to additional risk that the cash flow of the borrower and property securing the loan or debt, if any, may be insufficient to meet scheduled payments after giving effect to the senior secured obligations of the borrower. This risk is generally higher for subordinated unsecured loans or debt, which are not backed by a
security interest in any specific collateral. Second lien or subordinated loans or debt, both secured and unsecured, are expected to have greater price volatility than Senior Loans and may be less liquid. There is also a possibility that originators will not be able to sell participations in second lien loans and subordinated loans or debt, both secured and unsecured, which would create greater credit risk exposure. Second lien or other subordinated or unsecured loans or debt of below investment grade quality share risks similar to those associated with investments in other below investment grade securities and obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of Structured Products [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of Structured Products. The Fund may invest in structured products, including collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”), collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), structured notes, credit-linked notes and other types of structured products. Holders of structured products bear risks of the underlying investments, index or reference obligation and are subject to counterparty risk. The Fund may have the right to receive payments to which it is entitled only from the issuer of the structured product, and generally does not have direct rights against the issuer of, or the entity that sold, assets underlying the structured product. While certain structured products enable the investor to acquire interests in a pool of securities without the brokerage and other expenses associated with directly holding such securities, investors in structured products generally pay their share of the structured product’s administrative and other expenses. When investing in structured products, it is impossible to predict whether the underlying indices or prices of the underlying assets will rise or fall, but prices of the underlying indices and assets (and, therefore, the prices of structured products) will be influenced by the same types of political and economic events that affect particular issuers of securities and capital markets generally. Certain structured products may be thinly traded or have a limited trading market and may have the effect of increasing the Fund’s illiquidity to the extent that the Fund, at a particular point in time, may be unable to find qualified buyers for, and may have difficulty valuing, these securities.
CBOs, CLOs and other CDOs are typically privately offered and sold, and thus, are not registered under the securities laws. As a result, investments in CDOs may be characterized by the Fund as illiquid securities; however, an active dealer market may exist for CDOs allowing a CDO to be considered liquid in some circumstances. In addition to the general risks associated with fixed income securities discussed herein, CDOs carry additional risks including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or the collateral may go into default; (iii) the possibility that the CDOs are subordinate to other classes of obligations issued by the same issuer; and (iv) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the
time of investment and may produce disputes with the issuer or unexpected investment results.
Investments in structured notes involve risks including income risk, credit risk and market risk. Recent market conditions have magnified the risks related to an investment in structured products, including greater volatility, increased lack of liquidity and significant losses in value. Where the return on a structured note held by the Fund is based upon the movement of one or more factors, including currency exchange rates, interest rates, referenced bonds and stock indices, depending on the factor used and the use of multipliers or deflators, changes in interest rates and movement of the factor may cause significant fluctuations in the price of the structured note. Additionally, changes in the reference instrument or security may cause the interest rate on the structured note to be reduced to zero and any further changes in the reference instrument may then reduce the principal amount payable on maturity. Structured notes may be less liquid than other types of securities and more volatile than the reference instrument or security underlying the note.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments risk. To the extent the Fund invests in asset-backed and mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) securities or other instruments, its exposure to prepayment and extension risks may be greater than other investments in fixed income instruments. Asset-backed securities are in particular subject to interest rate risk. Generally, asset-backed securities increase in value to a lesser extent when interest rates decline and generally decline in value to a similar or greater extent when interest rates rise. Asset-backed securities are also subject to liquidity, valuation and credit risk.
The value of, and income generated by, investments in mortgage-backed securities are subject to the risks of asset-backed securities in general and the real estate markets. Rising interest rates tend to extend the duration of mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments, making them more sensitive to changes in interest rates. In addition, mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments are subject to prepayment risk—the risk that borrowers may pay off their mortgages sooner than expected, particularly when interest rates decline. This can reduce the Fund’s returns because the Fund may have to reinvest that money at lower prevailing interest rates. Economic downturns, rises in unemployment and other developments that limit or reduce the activities of and demand for real estate spaces or heightened credit and default risks associated with underlying mortgages may adversely impact the value of, and income generated by, such securities. The Fund’s investments in other asset-backed instruments, such as securities backed by car loans, are subject to risks similar to those associated with mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) securities.
Privately issued asset-backed and mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments are typically not traded on an exchange and may have a limited market. Without an active trading market, these instruments may be particularly difficult to value given the complexities in valuing the underlying collateral. Unlike many mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments issued or guaranteed by the US government, its agencies and instrumentalities, or a government-sponsored enterprise (such as the Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae), asset-backed and mortgage-backed (or mortgage-related) instruments issued by private issuers do not have a government or government-sponsored enterprise guarantee and may, and frequently do, have less favorable collateral, credit risk or other characteristics. Although instruments issued by a government-sponsored enterprise are sometimes considered to carry an implicit guarantee from the US government, there can be no assurance that the US government would in fact guarantee such instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of swaps [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of Swaps. The Fund may enter into swap transactions, including credit default, total return, index and interest rate swap agreements, as well as options thereon, and may purchase or sell interest rate caps, floors and collars. Such transactions are subject to market risk, risk of default by the other party to the transaction (i.e., counterparty risk), risk of imperfect correlation and manager risk and may involve commissions or other costs. Swaps generally do not involve delivery of securities, other underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to swaps generally is limited to the net amount of payments that the Fund is contractually obligated to make, or in the case of the other party to a swap defaulting, the net amount of payments that the Fund is contractually entitled to receive. If the Advisers are incorrect in their forecast of market values, interest rates or currency exchange rates, the investment performance of the Fund would be less favorable than it would have been if these investment techniques were not used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty Risk. Changes in the credit quality of the dealers that serve as the Fund’s counterparties with respect to derivatives, swaps or other transactions will affect the value of those instruments. In the event of a default by, or the insolvency of, a counterparty, the Fund may sustain losses or be unable to liquidate a derivative or swap position. Such risk is heightened in market environments where interest rates are changing, notably when rates are rising. The Fund and the Advisers seek to deal only with counterparties of high creditworthiness. All of the Fund’s bank or dealer counterparties (including bank or dealer derivative counterparties) will be subject to approval by the Advisers’ risk and compliance groups. The Advisers evaluate and monitor the creditworthiness of the Fund’s counterparties. Specifically, the Advisers’ risk and compliance personnel implement processes with respect to pre-approval, ongoing monitoring and parameters with respect to the Fund’s counterparty risk exposure. The
parameters and limitations that may be imposed depend on the creditworthiness of the Fund's counterparties and the nature of the transactions in which the Fund engages. The counterparty risk for cleared derivatives is generally lower than for uncleared over-the-counter derivative transactions since generally a clearing organization becomes substituted for each counterparty to a cleared derivative contract and, in effect, guarantees the parties’ performance under the contract as each party to a trade generally looks to the clearing organization for performance of financial obligations under the derivative contract. However, there can be no assurance that a clearing organization, or its members, will satisfy its obligations to the Fund. Counterparty risk also encompasses the risk of having concentrated exposure to one or more counterparties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Leverage Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Leverage Risk. The Fund is permitted to obtain leverage using any form or combination of financial leverage instruments, including reverse repurchase agreements, credit facilities such as bank loans or commercial paper, and the issuance of preferred shares or notes. The Fund intends to use leverage opportunistically and may choose to increase or decrease its leverage, or use different types or combinations of leveraging instruments, at any time based on the Fund’s assessment of market conditions and the investment environment.
There can be no assurance that a financial leveraging strategy will continue to be utilized by the Fund or that, if utilized, it will be successful during any period in which it is employed. Leverage creates risks for Common Shareholders, including the likelihood of greater volatility of NAV of the Common Shares and market price of, and distributions on, the Common Shares and the risk that fluctuations in the costs to borrow, or in the distribution or interest rates on any preferred shares or notes, may affect the return to Common Shareholders. To the extent the income derived from investments purchased with proceeds received from leverage exceeds the cost of leverage, the Fund’s distributions will be greater than if leverage had not been used. Conversely, if the income from the investments purchased with such proceeds is not sufficient to cover the cost of the financial leverage, the amount available for distribution to Common Shareholders will be less than if leverage had not been used. In the latter case, the Fund may nevertheless maintain its leveraged position if such action is deemed to be appropriate based on market conditions. The Fund has issued preferred shares. Holders of preferred shares will have rights to elect a minimum of two Trustees. This voting power may negatively affect Common Shareholders (or the interests of holders of preferred shares may differ from the interests of Common Shareholders). The use of leverage by the Fund may magnify the Fund’s losses when there is a decrease in the value of a Fund investment and even totally eliminate the Fund’s equity in its portfolio or a Common Shareholder’s equity in the Fund.
The costs of a financial leverage program (including the costs of offering preferred shares and notes) will be borne by Common Shareholders and consequently will result in a reduction of the NAV of the Common Shares. During periods in which the Fund is using leverage, the fees paid by the Fund for investment advisory services will be higher than if the Fund did not use leverage because the investment advisory fees paid will be calculated on the basis of the Fund’s Managed Assets, which includes proceeds from (and assets subject to) reverse repurchase agreements, any credit facility and any issuance of preferred shares or notes, so that the investment advisory fees payable to the Adviser will be higher when leverage is utilized. This will create a conflict of interest between the Advisers, on the one hand, and Common Shareholders, on the other hand. Fees and expenses in respect of financial leverage, as well as the investment advisory fee and all other expenses of the Fund, will be borne entirely by the Common Shareholders, and not by preferred shareholders, noteholders or any other leverage providers.
Any lender in connection with a credit facility may impose specific restrictions as a condition to borrowing. The credit facility fees may include, among other things, up front structuring fees and ongoing commitment fees (including fees on amounts undrawn on the facility) in addition to the traditional interest expense on amounts borrowed. The credit facility may involve a lien on the Fund’s assets. The Fund is currently a party to a credit facility. Similarly, to the extent the Fund issues additional preferred shares or notes, the Fund currently intends to seek a credit rating from one or more NRSROs on any preferred shares or notes it issues and the Fund may be subject to fees, covenants and investment restrictions required by the NRSRO as a result. Such covenants and restrictions imposed by a NRSRO or lender may include asset coverage or portfolio composition requirements that are more stringent than those imposed on the Fund by the 1940 Act. It is not anticipated that these covenants or restrictions will significantly impede the Advisers in managing the Fund’s portfolio in accordance with its investment objectives and policies. Nonetheless, if these covenants or guidelines are more restrictive than those imposed by the 1940 Act, the Fund may not be able to utilize as much leverage as it otherwise could have, which could reduce the Fund’s investment returns.
The Fund may enter into other transactions that may give rise to a form of leverage including, among others, swaps, futures and forward contracts, options and other derivative transactions. These transactions may represent a form of economic leverage and will create risks. The potential loss on derivative instruments may be substantial relative to the initial investment therein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign debt securities risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sovereign debt securities risk. Investments in government debt securities involve special risks. Certain countries have historically experienced, and may continue to experience, high rates of inflation, volatile interest rates, exchange rate fluctuations, large amounts of
external debt, balance of payments and trade difficulties and extreme poverty and unemployment. The issuer or governmental authority that controls the repayment of a country’s debt may not be able or willing to repay the principal and/or interest when due in accordance with the terms of such debt. A debtor’s willingness or ability to repay principal and interest due in a timely manner may be affected by, among other factors, its cash flow situation and, in the case of a government debtor, the extent of its foreign reserves, the availability of sufficient foreign exchange on the date a payment is due, the relative size of the debt service burden to the economy as a whole, the government debtor’s policy towards the International Monetary Fund and the political constraints to which a government debtor may be subject.
Government debtors may default on their debt and may also be dependent on expected disbursements from foreign governments, multilateral agencies and others abroad to reduce principal and interest arrearages on their debt. The commitment on the part of these governments, agencies and others to make such disbursements may be conditioned on a debtor’s implementation of economic reforms and/or economic performance and the timely service of such debtor’s obligations. Failure to implement such reforms, achieve such levels of economic performance or repay principal or interest when due may result in the cancellation of such third parties’ commitments to lend funds to the government debtor, which may further impair such debtor’s ability or willingness to service its debts on a timely basis. Holders of government debt, potentially including the Fund, may be requested to participate in the rescheduling of such debt and to extend further loans to government debtors.
As a result of the foregoing, a government obligor may default on its obligations. If such an event occurs, the Fund may have limited legal recourse against the issuer and/or guarantor. Remedies must, in some cases, be pursued in the courts of the defaulting party itself, and the ability of the holder of foreign government debt securities to obtain recourse may be subject to the political climate in the relevant country.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of Other Derivative Instruments [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of Other Derivative Instruments. The Fund may utilize options, forward contracts, futures contracts and options on futures contracts. These instruments involve risks, including the imperfect correlation between the value of such instruments and the underlying assets, the possible default by the counterparty to the transaction (i.e., counterparty risk), illiquidity of the derivative instrument and, to the extent the prediction as to certain market movements is incorrect, the risk that the use of such instruments could result in losses greater than if they had not been used. In addition, transactions in such instruments may involve commissions and other costs, which may increase the Fund’s expenses and reduce its return. Amounts paid as premiums and cash or other assets held in margin accounts with
respect to such instruments are not otherwise available to the Fund for investment purposes.
Further, the use of such instruments by the Fund could create the possibility that losses on the instrument would be greater than gains in the value of the Fund’s position. In addition, futures and options markets could be illiquid in some circumstances, and certain over-the-counter options could have no markets. As a result, in certain markets, the Fund might not be able to close out a position without incurring substantial losses. To the extent that the Fund utilizes forward contracts, futures contracts or options transactions for hedging, such transactions should tend to minimize the risk of loss due to a decline in the value of the hedged position and, at the same time, limit any potential gain to the Fund that might result from an increase in value of the position. In addition, the daily variation margin requirements for futures contracts create a greater ongoing potential financial risk than would purchases of call options, in which case the market exposure is limited to the cost of the initial premium and transaction costs. Losses resulting from the use of hedging will reduce the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares, and possibly income, and the losses can be greater than if hedging had not been used. Forward contracts may limit gains on portfolio securities that could otherwise be realized had they not been utilized and could result in losses. The contracts may also increase the Fund’s volatility and may involve a significant amount of risk relative to the investment of cash. The use of put and call options may result in losses to the Fund, force the sale of portfolio securities at inopportune times or for prices other than at current market values, limit the amount of appreciation the Fund can realize on its investments or cause the Fund to hold a security it might otherwise sell. The Fund will be subject to credit risk with respect to the counterparties to any transactions in options, forward contracts, futures contracts or options on futures contracts. If a counterparty becomes bankrupt or otherwise fails to perform its obligations under a derivative contract due to financial difficulties, the Fund may experience significant delays in obtaining any recovery under the derivative contract in bankruptcy or other reorganization proceeding. The Fund may obtain only a limited recovery or may obtain no recovery in such circumstances.
When conducted outside the United States, transactions in options, forward contracts, futures contracts or options on futures contracts may not be regulated as rigorously as in the United States, may not involve a clearing mechanism and related guarantees, and are subject to the risk of governmental actions affecting trading in, or the prices of, foreign securities, currencies and other instruments. The value of such positions also could be adversely affected by: (i) other complex foreign political, legal and economic factors; (ii) lesser availability than in the United States of data on which to make trading decisions; (iii) delays in the Fund’s ability to act upon economic events occurring in foreign markets during non-business hours in the United States; (iv)
the imposition of different exercise and settlement terms and procedures and margin requirements than in the United States; and (v) lower trading volume and liquidity.
In October 2020, the SEC adopted Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act governing a registered investment company’s use of derivatives, short sales, reverse repurchase agreements, and certain other instruments. Under Rule 18f-4, a fund’s derivatives exposure is limited through a value-at-risk test and requires the adoption and implementation of a derivatives risk management program for certain derivatives users. However, subject to certain conditions, funds that do not invest heavily in derivatives may be deemed limited derivatives users and would not be subject to the full requirements of Rule 18f-4. Under the rule, when the Fund trades reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions, including certain tender option bonds, it needs to aggregate the amount of indebtedness associated with the reverse repurchase agreements or similar financing transactions with the aggregate amount of any other senior securities representing indebtedness when calculating the Fund’s asset coverage ratio or treat all such transactions as derivatives transactions. In addition, under the rule, the Fund is permitted to invest in a security on a when-issued or forward-settling basis, or with a non-standard settlement cycle, and the transaction will be deemed not to involve a senior security (as defined under Section 18(g) of the 1940 Act), provided that, (i) the Fund intends to physically settle the transaction and (ii) the transaction will settle within 35 days of its trade date (the “Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision”). The Fund may otherwise engage in when-issued, forward-settling and non-standard settlement cycle securities transactions that do not meet the conditions of the Delayed-Settlement Securities Provision so long as the Fund treats any such transaction as a “derivatives transaction” for purposes of compliance with the rule. Furthermore, under the rule, the Fund is permitted to enter into an unfunded commitment agreement, and such unfunded commitment agreement will not be subject to the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act, if the Fund reasonably believes, at the time it enters into such agreement, that it will have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect to all such agreements as they come due. These requirements may limit the ability of the Fund to use derivatives, and reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions as part of its investment strategies. These requirements may increase the cost of the Fund’s investments and cost of doing business, which could adversely affect investors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lender Liability Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lender Liability Risk. A number of US judicial decisions have upheld judgments for borrowers against lending institutions on the basis of various evolving legal theories, collectively termed “lender liability.” Generally, lender liability is founded on the premise that a lender has violated a duty (whether implied or contractual) of good faith, commercial reasonableness and fair dealing, or a similar duty owed to
the borrower or has assumed an excessive degree of control over the borrower resulting in the creation of a fiduciary duty owed to the borrower or its other creditors or shareholders. Because of the nature of its investments, the Fund may be subject to allegations of lender liability.
In addition, under common law principles that in some cases form the basis for lender liability claims, if a lender or bondholder (a) intentionally takes an action that results in the undercapitalization of a borrower to the detriment of other creditors of such borrower, (b) engages in other inequitable conduct to the detriment of such other creditors, (c) engages in fraud with respect to, or makes misrepresentations to, such other creditors or (d) uses its influence as a stockholder to dominate or control a borrower to the detriment of other creditors of such borrower, a court may elect to subordinate the claim of the offending lender or bondholder to the claims of the disadvantaged creditor or creditors, a remedy called “equitable subordination.”
Because affiliates of, or persons related to, the Advisers may hold equity or other interests in obligors of the Fund, the Fund could be exposed to claims for equitable subordination or lender liability or both based on such equity or other holdings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nav Discount Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV Discount Risk. Frequently, shares of closed-end investment companies, such as the Fund, trade at a price below their NAV, commonly referred to as a “discount.” Historically, shares of closed-end funds have traded at a discount to their NAV, and the Fund can provide no assurance that its Common Shares will trade at or above their NAV. The Fund’s Common Shares frequently trade at a discount to NAV.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager Risk. As with any managed fund, the Advisers may not be successful in selecting the best-performing investments or investment techniques in managing the Fund’s portfolio, and the Fund’s performance may lag behind that of similar funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts of Interest Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts of Interest Risk. The portfolio managers' management of “other accounts” may give rise to potential conflicts of interest in connection with their management of a Fund's investments, on the one hand, and the investments of the other accounts, on the other. The other accounts may have the same investment objective as the Fund. Therefore, a potential conflict of interest may arise as a result of the identical investment objectives, whereby the portfolio manager could favor one account over another. However, the Adviser (and Sub-Adviser) believes that these risks are mitigated by the fact that: (i) accounts with like investment strategies managed by a particular portfolio manager are generally managed in a similar fashion, subject to exceptions to account for particular investment restrictions or policies applicable only to certain accounts, differences in cash flows and account sizes, and similar factors; and (ii) portfolio manager personal trading is monitored to avoid potential conflicts. In
addition, the Adviser (and Sub-Adviser) has adopted trade allocation procedures that require equitable allocation of trade orders for a particular security among participating accounts. In some cases, another account managed by the same portfolio manager may compensate abrdn based on the performance of the portfolio held by that account. The existence of such a performance-based fee may create additional conflicts of interest for the portfolio manager in the allocation of management time, resources and investment opportunities.
Another potential conflict could include instances in which securities considered as investments for the Fund also may be appropriate for other investment accounts managed by the Adviser or its affiliates. Whenever decisions are made to buy or sell securities by the Fund and one or more of the other accounts simultaneously, the Adviser (and/or Sub-Adviser) may aggregate the purchases and sales of the securities and will allocate the securities transactions in a manner that it believes to be equitable under the circumstances. As a result of the allocations, there may be instances where the Fund will not participate in a transaction that is allocated among other accounts. While these aggregation and allocation policies could have a detrimental effect on the price or amount of the securities available to the Fund from time to time, it is the opinion of the Adviser (or Sub-Adviser) that the benefits from the policies outweigh any disadvantage that may arise from exposure to simultaneous transactions. The Trust has adopted policies that are designed to eliminate or minimize conflicts of interest, although there is no guarantee that procedures adopted under such policies will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.
From time to time, the Adviser and/or the Sub-adviser may seed proprietary accounts for the purpose of evaluating a new investment strategy that eventually may be available to clients through one or more product structures. Such accounts also may serve the purpose of establishing a performance record for the strategy. The management by the Adviser and/or the Sub-adviser of accounts with proprietary interests and nonproprietary client accounts may create an incentive to favor the proprietary accounts in the allocation of investment opportunities, and the timing and aggregation of investments. The Adviser's and Sub-adviser's proprietary seed accounts may include long-short strategies, and certain client strategies may permit short sales. A conflict of interest arises if a security is sold short at the same time as a long position, and continuous short selling in a security may adversely affect the stock price of the same security held long in client accounts. The Adviser and Sub-adviser have adopted various policies to mitigate these conflicts.
In addition, the 1940 Act limits the Fund's ability to enter into certain transactions with certain affiliates of the Advisers. As a result of these restrictions, the Fund may be prohibited from buying or selling any
security directly from or to any portfolio company of a fund managed by the Advisers or one of their affiliates. Nonetheless, the Fund may under certain circumstances purchase any such portfolio company's loans or securities in the secondary market, which could create a conflict for the Advisers between the interests of the Fund and the portfolio company, in that the ability of the Advisers to recommend actions in the best interest of the Fund might be impaired. The 1940 Act also prohibits certain “joint” transactions with certain of the Fund's affiliates (which could include other abrdn-managed Funds), which could be deemed to include certain types of investments, or restructuring of investments, in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different times). These limitations may limit the scope of investment opportunities that would otherwise be available to the Fund. The Board has approved policies and procedures reasonably designed to monitor potential conflicts of interest. The Board will review these procedures and any conflicts that may arise.
The Adviser (or Sub-adviser) or their respective members, officers, directors, employees, principals or affiliates may come into possession of material, non-public information. The possession of such information may limit the ability of the Fund to buy or sell a security or otherwise to participate in an investment opportunity. Situations may occur where the Fund could be disadvantaged because of the investment activities conducted by the Adviser (and Sub-adviser) for other clients, and the Adviser (or Sub-adviser) will not employ information barriers with regard to its operations on behalf of its registered and private funds, or other accounts. In certain circumstances, employees of the Adviser (or Sub-adviser) may serve as board members or in other capacities for portfolio or potential portfolio companies, which could restrict the Fund's ability to trade in the securities of such companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreements and Reverse Repurchase Agreements Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreements and Reverse Repurchase Agreements Risk. The Fund may invest in repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements. In its purchase of repurchase agreements, the Fund does not bear the risk of a decline in the value of the underlying security unless the seller defaults under its repurchase obligation. In the event of the bankruptcy or other default of a seller of a repurchase agreement, the Fund could experience both delays in liquidating the underlying securities and losses, including possible decline in the value of the underlying security during the period while the Fund seeks to enforce its rights thereto, possible lack of access to income on the underlying security during this period, and expenses of enforcing its rights. A repurchase agreement effectively represents a loan from the Fund to the seller under the agreement.
The Fund’s use of reverse repurchase agreements involves many of the same risks involved in the Fund’s use of financial leverage, as the proceeds from reverse repurchase agreements generally will be invested in additional securities. There is a risk that the market value of the securities acquired in the reverse repurchase agreement may
decline below the price of the securities that the Fund has sold but remains obligated to repurchase. In addition, there is a risk that the market value of the securities retained by the Fund may decline. If the buyer of securities under a reverse repurchase agreement were to file for bankruptcy or experience insolvency, the Fund may be adversely affected. Also, in entering into reverse repurchase agreements, the Fund would bear the risk of loss to the extent that the proceeds of the reverse repurchase agreement are less than the value of the underlying securities. In addition, due to the interest costs associated with reverse repurchase agreements, the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares will decline, and, in some cases, the investment performance of the Fund would be less favorable than it would have been if the Fund had not used such instruments. A reverse repurchase agreement effectively represents a loan from the buyer to the Fund under the agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cybersecurity Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cybersecurity Risk. Cybersecurity incidents may allow an unauthorized party to gain access to Fund assets, customer data (including private shareholder information), or proprietary information, or cause the Fund, the Adviser and/or its service providers (including, but not limited to, Fund accountants, custodians, sub-custodians, transfer agents and financial intermediaries) to suffer data breaches, data corruption or lose operational functionality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment risk. You may lose money by investing in the Fund, including the possibility that you may lose all of your investment. An investment in the Fund is not a deposit in a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency.
The Fund is intended to be a long-term investment vehicle and is not designed to provide investors with a means of speculating on short-term stock market movements. Investors should not consider the Fund a complete investment program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of investing in other investment companies [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks of investing in other investment companies. The Fund may acquire shares in other investment companies, including foreign investment companies to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. The market value of the shares of other investment companies may differ from the NAV of the particular fund. As a shareholder in an investment company, the Fund would bear its ratable share of that entity’s expenses, including its investment advisory and administration fees. At the same time, the Fund would continue to pay its own investment advisory fees and other expenses. As a result, the Fund and its Common Shareholders, in effect, will be absorbing two levels of fees with respect to investments in other investment companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zero coupon securities risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zero coupon securities risk. Certain debt obligations purchased by the Fund may take the form of zero coupon bonds. A zero coupon bond is a bond that does not pay interest either for the entire life of the obligation or for an initial period after the issuance of the obligation. When held to its maturity, its return comes from the difference between the purchase price and its maturity value. A zero coupon bond is normally issued and traded at a deep discount from face value. Zero coupon bonds allow an issuer to avoid or delay the need to generate cash to meet current interest payments and, as a result, may involve greater credit risk than bonds that pay interest currently or in cash. The Fund would be required to distribute the income on any of these instruments as it accrues, even though the Fund will not receive all of the income on a current basis or in cash. Thus, the Fund may have to sell other investments, including when it may not be advisable to do so, to make income distributions to its shareholders.
Distributions attributable to the Fund’s “original issue discount” income accruing on zero coupon bonds, and of all other ordinary income, will generally be taxable to the Common Shareholders as ordinary income. As a consequence of selling investments in order to make distributions of “original issue discount” income and other income in respect of which the Fund has not received a corresponding amount of cash, the Fund may realize additional income that gives rise to additional distribution requirements; distributions of such additional income may be taxable to the Common Shareholders as ordinary income or as long-term capital gain depending on which investments are sold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflation risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflation risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be worth less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. To the extent that inflation occurs, it will reduce the real value of dividends paid by the Fund and the Fund’s Common Shares. Most emerging market countries, in particular, have experienced substantial, and in some periods extremely high and volatile, rates of inflation. Inflation and rapid fluctuations in inflation rates have had and may continue to have very negative effects on the economies and securities markets globally. In an attempt to control inflation, wage and price controls have been imposed at times in certain countries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When issued and delayed delivery securities risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When-issued and delayed delivery securities risk. The Fund may purchase and sell securities on a “when-issued” or “delayed delivery” basis whereby the Fund buys or sells a security with payment and delivery taking place in the future. These transactions are subject to market risk as the value or yield of a security at delivery may be more or less than the purchase price or the yield generally available on securities when delivery occurs. In addition, the Fund is subject to counterparty risk because it relies on the buyer or seller, as the case may be, to consummate the transaction, and failure by the other party to complete the transaction may result in the Fund missing the
opportunity of obtaining a price or yield considered to be advantageous. When the Fund is the buyer in such a transaction, however, it will segregate cash and/or liquid securities having an aggregate value at least equal to the amount of such purchase commitments until payment is made. An increase in the percentage of the Fund’s assets committed to the purchase of securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis may increase the volatility of the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illiquid investments risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illiquid investments risk. The Fund’s investments in relatively illiquid investments and loans may restrict the ability of the Fund to dispose of its investments in a timely fashion and for fair value, as well as its ability to fairly value such investments and take advantage of market opportunities. The risks associated with illiquidity will be particularly acute in situations in which the Fund’s operations require cash, such as when the Fund pays dividends or distributions, and could result in the Fund borrowing to meet short-term cash requirements or incurring capital losses on the sale of illiquid investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short sales risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short sales risk. The Fund may engage in short sales. Short sales involve certain risks and special considerations. If the Fund incorrectly predicts that the price of the borrowed security will decline, the Fund will have to replace the securities with securities with a greater value than the amount received from the sale. As a result, losses from short sales differ from losses that could be incurred from a purchase of a security, because losses from short sales may be unlimited, whereas losses from purchases can equal only the total amount invested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities risk. The value of equity securities, including common stock, preferred stock and convertible stock, will fluctuate in response to factors affecting the particular company, as well as broader market and economic conditions. An adverse event, such as an unfavorable earnings report, may depress the value of an issuer’s equity securities held by the Fund. The prices of equity securities fluctuate for several reasons, including changes in investors’ perceptions of the financial condition of an issuer or the general condition of the relevant market, or when political or economic events affecting the issuer occur. In addition, equity security prices may be particularly sensitive to interest rates fluctuations, as the cost of capital and borrowing costs change. Moreover, in the event of a company’s bankruptcy, claims of certain creditors, including bondholders, will have priority over claims of common stock holders and are likely to have varying types of priority over holders of preferred and convertible stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants risk. The Fund may invest in warrants. The risk of investing in a warrant is that the warrant may expire prior to the market value of the common stock exceeding the price fixed by the warrant. Warrants have a subordinate claim on a borrower’s assets compared with Senior Loans. As a result, the values of warrants generally are dependent on the financial condition of the borrower and less
dependent on fluctuations in interest rates than are the values of many debt securities. The values of warrants may be more volatile than those of Senior Loans and this may increase the volatility of the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary investments risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary investments risk. During periods in which the Advisers believe that changes in economic, financial or political conditions make it advisable to do so, the Fund may, for temporary defensive purposes, reduce its primary investment holdings and invest in certain short-term and medium-term debt securities or hold cash. The Fund intends to invest for temporary defensive purposes only in short-term and medium-term debt securities believed to be of high quality, which are expected to be subject to relatively low risk of loss of interest or principal. In taking such defensive position, the Fund temporarily would not be pursuing and may not achieve its investment objectives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax risk. The Fund has elected to be treated as, and intends to continue to qualify each year as, a “regulated investment company” under the Code. Assuming the Fund qualifies as a regulated investment company, it generally will not be subject to US federal income tax on its “investment company taxable income” as that term is defined in the Code (which includes, among other items, dividends, taxable interest, original issue discount, market discount and the excess of any net short-term capital gains over net long-term capital losses, as reduced by certain deductible expenses), and net capital gain, that it distributes (including amounts that are treated as distributed and reinvested pursuant to the Plan, as described below) to shareholders, provided that, for each taxable year, the Fund distributes (or is treated as distributing) to its shareholders an amount at least equal to 90% of its investment company taxable income. The Fund intends to continue to distribute annually all or substantially all of its investment company taxable income and net capital gain. In order for the Fund to qualify as a regulated investment company in any taxable year, the Fund must also meet certain asset diversification tests and at least 90% of its gross income for such year must be comprised of certain types of qualifying income. If, for any taxable year, the Fund does not qualify as a regulated investment company, it will be treated as a corporation subject to US federal income tax on its net income and capital gains at the regular corporate tax rates (without a deduction for distributions to shareholders). In addition, shareholders will be subject to tax on distributions to the extent of the Fund’s current or accumulated earnings and profits. Accordingly, in such event, the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objectives would be adversely affected, and Common Shareholders would be subject to the risk of diminished investment returns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation risk. Unlike publicly traded common stock which trades on national exchanges, there is no central place or exchange for loans or fixed-income instruments to trade. Loans and fixed-income
instruments generally trade on an “over-the-counter” market which may be anywhere in the world where the buyer and seller can settle on a price. Due to the lack of centralized information and trading, the valuation of loans or fixed-income instruments may carry more risk than that of common stock. Uncertainties in the conditions of the financial market, unreliable reference data, lack of transparency and inconsistency of valuation models and processes may lead to inaccurate asset pricing. In addition, other market participants may value securities differently than the Fund. As a result, the Fund may be subject to the risk that when a loan or fixed-income instrument is sold in the market, the amount received by the Fund is less than the value of such loans or fixed-income instruments carried on the Fund’s books.
US government debt securities risk. US government debt securities have historically not involved the credit risks associated with investments in other types of debt securities, although, as a result, the yields available from US government debt securities are generally lower than the yields available from other securities. Like other debt securities, however, the values of US government securities change as interest rates fluctuate. Fluctuations in the value of portfolio securities will not affect interest income on existing portfolio securities but will be reflected in the NAV of the Fund’s Common Shares. Since the magnitude of these fluctuations will generally be greater at times when the Fund’s average maturity is longer, under certain market conditions the Fund may, for temporary defensive purposes, accept lower current income from short-term investments rather than investing in higher yielding long-term securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational Risk. Your ability to transact with the Fund or the valuation of your investment may be negatively impacted because of the operational risks arising from factors such as processing errors and human errors, inadequate or failed internal or external processes, failures in systems and technology, changes in personnel, and errors caused by third-party service providers or trading counterparties. Although the Fund attempts to minimize such failures through controls and oversight, it is not possible to identify all of the operational risks that may affect the Fund or to develop processes and controls that completely eliminate or mitigate the occurrence of such failures. The Fund and its shareholders could be negatively impacted as a result.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government intervention in the financial markets risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government intervention in the financial markets risk. In the past decade financial markets throughout the world have experienced increased volatility, depressed valuations, decreased liquidity and heightened uncertainty. Governmental and non-governmental issuers have defaulted on, or been forced to restructure, their debts. Federal Reserve or other US or non-US governmental or central bank actions, including interest rate increases or contrary actions by different governments, could negatively affect financial markets
generally, increase market volatility and reduce the value and liquidity of securities in which the fund invests.
Federal, state, and other governments, their regulatory agencies or self-regulatory organizations may take additional actions that affect the regulation of the securities or structured products in which the Fund invests, or the issuers of such securities or structured products, in ways that are unforeseeable. Borrowers under Senior Loans held by the Fund may seek protection under bankruptcy laws. Legislation or regulation may also change the way in which the Fund itself is regulated. Such legislation or regulation could limit or preclude the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objectives. The Advisers monitor developments and seek to manage the Fund’s portfolio in a manner consistent with achieving the Fund’s investment objectives, but there can be no assurance that they will be successful in doing so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-takeover provisions risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-takeover provisions. The Fund’s Agreement and Declaration of Trust and By-Laws include provisions that could limit the ability of other entities or persons to acquire control of the Fund or convert the Fund to open-end status and delay or limit the ability of other persons to acquire control of the Fund. These provisions could deprive the Common Shareholders of opportunities to sell their Common Shares at a premium over the then-current market price of the Common Shares or at NAV. The Fund’s Board has determined that these provisions are in the best interests of shareholders generally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESG Integration Risk [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESG Integration Risk. To the extent the ESG factors are used to evaluate investments, the consideration of such factors may adversely affect the Fund’s performance. Not every ESG factor may be identified or evaluated for every investment. ESG characteristics may not be the only factors considered and, as a result, the issuers in which the Fund invests may not be issuers with favorable ESG characteristics or high ESG ratings. The application of ESG factors may result in the Fund performing differently than its benchmark index and other funds in its peer group that do not consider ESG factors or consider different ESG factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Highlights [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Securities Amount |
|
|
$ 240,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
$ 105,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
$ 88,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
$ 240,000,000
|
|
$ 105,000,000
|
|
$ 88,000,000
|
|
$ 118,000,000
|
|
$ 81,200,000
|
$ 72,000,000
|
$ 83,000,000
|
$ 83,000,000
|
$ 83,000,000
|
$ 90,000,000
|
Senior Securities Coverage per Unit |
|
|
$ 4,582
|
[10] |
|
|
|
$ 4,618
|
[10] |
|
|
|
$ 3,348
|
[10] |
|
|
|
$ 4,582
|
[10] |
$ 4,618
|
[10] |
$ 3,348
|
[10] |
$ 3,399
|
[10] |
$ 3,178
|
$ 3,263
|
$ 3,217
|
$ 3,402
|
$ 3,305
|
$ 3,166
|
Preferred Stock Liquidating Preference |
|
|
$ 0
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0
|
|
$ 0
|
|
$ 0
|
|
$ 0
|
|
$ 0
|
$ 0
|
$ 0
|
$ 0
|
$ 0
|
$ 0
|
Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Securities [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security Title [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
|
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
|
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
|
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
|
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
|
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility
|
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Highlights [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Securities Amount |
|
|
$ 40,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
$ 40,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
$ 40,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
$ 40,000,000
|
|
$ 40,000,000
|
|
$ 40,000,000
|
|
$ 40,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Securities Coverage per Unit |
[11] |
|
$ 3,927
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3,344
|
|
|
|
|
$ 2,302
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3,927
|
|
$ 3,344
|
|
$ 2,302
|
|
$ 2,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Liquidating Preference |
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
$ 25
|
|
|
|
|
$ 25
|
|
|
|
|
$ 25
|
|
$ 25
|
|
$ 25
|
|
$ 25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Securities [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security Title [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares
|
|
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares
|
|
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares
|
|
5.250% Series A Perpetual Preferred Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Share [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV Per Share |
|
|
$ 6.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 6.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Securities [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Security, Title [Text Block] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Security, Held [Shares] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,470,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee For Open Market Purchases Of Common Shares [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee Table [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Fees |
[12] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee For Optional Shares Purchases [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee Table [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Fees |
[12] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Of Shares Held In Dividend Reinvestment Account [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee Table [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Fees |
[12] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual Expenses [Abstract] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Transaction Fees Basis, Maximum |
[12] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|