Novo Resources Corp. (
Novo or the
Company) (ASX: NVO) (TSX: NVO) (OTCQX: NSRPF) is
pleased to provide an update on the exploration status of projects
across its approx. 5,500 sq km prospective landholding the Pilbara,
Western Australia (
Figure 1).
Figure 1: Novo Pilbara tenure
showing main projects and significant prospects.
EGINA GOLD CAMP
The Egina Gold Camp (EGC) is
located centrally within Novo’s Pilbara tenure and is the Company’s
flagship project area. The EGC covers some 80 km of continuous
tenure across prospective stratigraphy of the Mallina Basin, with
approximately 900 sq km managed by Novo and 1,050 sq km in the
Egina Joint Venture managed by De Grey Mining (ASX: DEG).
The EGC hosts Novo’s current high priority
Pilbara targets (Figure 2) primarily at
Becher in the north, but also with several
emerging prospects throughout the southern EGC. This belt has been
the main focus for Novo’s 2024 Pilbara exploration programs with
drilling completed at Nunyerry North, and mapping and surface
sampling of targets along the Tabba Tabba Shear
Corridor.
Egina Earn-in/JV (De Grey earning a 50%
interest)
In June 2023, Novo entered into an earn-in and
joint venture agreement with De Grey for the Company’s Becher
Project and adjacent tenements within the EGC. De Grey exceeded the
A$7 million minimum expenditure commitment on the Egina JV in
October 2024 and have committed to a further spend of A$18 million
by June 30, 2027, to earn 50% in the project.
Northern Star Resources Limited (ASX: NST)
recently announced its intention to acquire De Grey for a deal
valued at A$5 billion (see NST’s ASX announcement dated 2 December
2024), highlighting the region as a new major gold production
hub.
Figure 2 Location of the Egina
Gold Camp and Balla Balla Gold Project tenure with major structural
corridors over aeromagnetic imaging.
Nunyerry North
Follow up RC drilling was completed at Nunyerry
North in Q4 2024, testing extents of known mineralisation, and
stepping out to additional targets defined by soil sampling,
mapping and rock chip sampling. A series of encouraging intercepts
were reported from the 34-hole, 3,942 m program1
including:
- 13 m at 2.68 g/t Au
from 66 m, including 3 m at 10.41 g/t Au from 66 m (NC046)
- 11 m at 2.20 g/t Au
from 84 m, including 1 m at 18.06 g/t Au from 86 m (NC046)
- 17 m at 1.85 g/t Au
from 25 m, including 7 m at 3.55 g/t Au from 25 m (NC063)
Although numerous intercepts have been reported
at Nunyerry North, results from the RC program have not delineated
extensive nor continuous gold mineralisation at depth, and at this
stage an economic resource appears unlikely. Follow-up work is a
low priority at Nunyerry North as Novo focusses further north along
the EGC.
Tabba Tabba Shear Corridor
Exploration has progressed to the north of
Nunyerry North in Q3/Q4 2024 to expand first pass surface
geochemical coverage on the ~ 60 km long fertile Tabba Tabba Shear
Corridor, with new targets identified from re-interpretation of
geology and observations from Nunyerry North drilling. Most of the
Corridor is underexplored, as access is difficult and significant
parts are covered with shallow alluvium and colluvium or overlain
by Fortescue Group basalt.
Only minimal parts have been drill tested by
Novo (Nunyerry North) and (previous holder) Kilkenny Gold NL
(Kilkenny North)1.
Several new targets have now been tested with
first pass surface geochemistry (Figure 3). Soil
sample grids at a nominal 40 m x 160 m spacing targeted structural
intersections of faults and shears, particularly where folded
stratigraphy or minor intrusions are noted. Soil sampling returned
peak results of 794 ppb Au, and from 1,308 samples collected.
Opportunistic rock sampling included a best result of 3.8 g/t Au
from 127 samples collected. See Appendices 1 and 2 for all
significant results.
Recent exploration results are encouraging. The
most significant results returned to date define a coherent linear
soil gold anomaly greater than 20 ppb Au trending between
No 6 bore to Kilkenny North over ~ 5 km strike,
with elevated rock samples of up to 3.8 g/t Au associated with
narrow brecciated zones and stringer veins (Figure
3).
Additional surface sampling and follow-up on
delineated anomalies is planned for 2025, to expand on geochemical
coverage over the district. In addition, heritage negotiations will
be prioritised to access and assess the Teichman
Top prospect where previous explorers obtained high-grade
surface results including 25.5 g/t Au and 32.3 g/t Au from rock
samples1.
Figure 3: Gold in soil
geochemistry and main prospects of the Tabba Tabba Shear
Corridor
BALLA BALLA GOLD PROJECT
Novo executed a Determination Wide Aboriginal
Heritage Protection Agreement with the Kariyarra Aboriginal
Corporation1, enabling the grant of application E47/4703 in
November 2024, critical to Novo’s targeting strategy for the Balla
Balla Project (Figure 1 and Figure
2).
A site avoidance heritage survey has been
completed with Kariyarra, and a Programme of Work has been approved
by the regulator (DEMIRS), enabling first pass AC drilling to be
conducted over priority shear corridors in H1 2025 (Figure
4). The AC program targets potentially fertile structures
and splays of the Sholl Shear Zone under shallow cover.
Figure 4 Balla Balla Project
geology showing the Sholl Shear Zone and complex folded
stratigraphy
KARRATHA DISTRICT
Exploration in the Karratha District
(Figure 1) has advanced several drill targets,
including North Whundo, Railway Bore and East Well (Figure
5)2. A maiden RC drilling program is planned for 2025 to
test these three prospects for Au and Au-Cu (+/-Pt and Pd)
mineralisation once heritage and regulatory approvals are
obtained.
Figure 5 Location of the
Karratha District drill targets
PILBARA ANTIMONY-GOLD
EVALUATION
Sherlock Crossing
The historic Sherlock Crossing antimony mine was
discovered in 1906 and operated during 1907 to 1916. According to
historic records, the mine initially produced 16 tonnes of
concentrate grading 53% Sb and 10.9 g/t Au to 72.9 g/t Au and in
1916, a further 5.66 tonnes of concentrate grading 42.2% Sb and
15.6 g/t Au3.Novo previously conducted surface soil and rock
sampling at Sherlock Crossing (Figure 2) with peak
results of 1.71 g/t Au and 592 ppm Sb4.
During follow up exploration, Novo recently
collected an additional fourteen rock samples targeting mineralised
material associated with the historical antimony mine, and vein
material along strike of the mine towards the south. These samples
returned exceptional results including 4.7% and 3.1% Sb,
and 146.7 ppm and 35.3 ppm Au. These samples are hand
selected from mining spoils and may not be indicative of
mineralisation in the district but do validate the high grades
reported historically from mining activities (Figure
6). See Appendix 3 for all results.
The accessible extent of historical mining is
constrained to a small area, with additional workings described in
historic literature now entirely covered by flood transported sands
and clay. The minimal outcrop is part of a north-south trending
structural corridor, entirely untested by modern exploration. Based
on the new results and historic information, Novo is now
progressing Programme of Work and heritage approvals for a maiden
RC drill test in 2025.
Figure 6 Rock sample Sb results
over mapped geology at Sherlock Crossing. Latest results are shown
as larger squares.
MIRALGA
Surface sampling and mapping was recently
conducted at the Miralga district in the East Pilbara
(Figure 7), following the execution of a
Determination Wide Aboriginal Heritage Protection Agreement with
the Nyamal Aboriginal Corporation in August5 2024.
The project is located on the eastern flank of
the North Pole Dome where porphyry style Cu-Au and
epithermal Au-Ag-Cu-Pb-Zn vein and breccia-style
mineralisation have been historically observed.
Geophysical and remote sensing interpretation, coupled with review
of existing geochemical datasets identified several targets on
Novo’s tenure, some of which have seen little to no historical
exploration5.
Figure 7 East Pilbara tenement
location map, showing Miralga District and key prospects.
Shady Camp
At Shady Camp, an altered porphyritic
intrusion of dacitic composition intrudes shallowly
dipping basalt-andesite-chert stratigraphy, with both the intrusion
and intruded stratigraphy strongly kaolin and chlorite altered. The
intrusion hosts several phases of high-density veining, including
shallow crustal level vuggy quartz veins, and stockwork style
quartz veining that displays multiple hydrothermal events. It is
cut by a strongly to intensely foliated and brecciated shear zone,
showing intense goethite / hematite / limonite alteration, trending
to the southwest. A locally brecciated quartz vein system flanks
the intrusion, and strikes > 1.4 km to the north (Figure
8).
A broad scale pXRF soil sampling program was
completed over a nominal 40 m by 160 m grid incorporating the
intrusion, shear zone, and quartz vein system, and delineated a
3.5 km long Cu anomaly, which was resampled by -80
mesh soil sampling and analysed for gold and base metals using aqua
regia for 33 elements. A total of 737 soil samples were collected
on a 40 m by 80 m grid or 40 m by 40 m grid and returned a peak of
848 ppm Cu and 89 ppb Au. Selective rock sampling includes peak
results of 1.16 g/t Au and 4.4% Cu. See Appendix 4 and 5 for
significant results.
Coherent gold mineralisation is associated with
the mapped high vein density and the margin of the intrusion. A
broad low-level gold anomaly over > 4 ppb forms an ellipse of
200 m by 400 m, with a 50 m by 200 m core of Au > 32 ppb
(Figure 8). Elevated gold and most of the
significant Cu mineralisation is associated with the quartz vein
system and the altered shear zone, which may relate to
remobilisation along these structures.
Figure 8 Gold soil geochemistry
over simplified geology at Shady Camp West.
Gully Washer
Surface pXRF sampling at Gully Washer generated
a modest Cu anomaly around the high-grade vein breccia outcrop
where rock samples collected by Novo in 2021 returned peak results
of 14.8 g/t Au, 10,083 g/t Ag (342 oz/t Ag), 3.8% Cu, 28.3% Pb and
3.6% Zn4 (these results are not necessarily representative of
mineralisation in the district). This anomaly is flanked by two
larger surface pXRF Cu anomalies to the northeast and southwest,
both of which strike for approximately two kilometres. Follow up
-80 mesh soil sampling and mapping will be conducted after the wet
season.
FORWARD PROGRAMS
Pilbara
At the Egina JV, De Grey have
committed to a further spend of A$18 million by June 30, 2027 and
are compiling and analysing results from recently completed work
programs to developing follow-up programs, including targeted RC
and diamond drilling.
Once additional heritage permits and clearances
are in place, De Grey will be well-positioned for exploring
additional target areas that have previously seen little to no
modern exploration, with planned activities ranging from
early-stage ground gravity surveys, surficial geochemical surveys,
geological mapping through to AC drilling for target generation and
sub-surface geological mapping and follow up RC and DD target
testing6.
Novo plans to conduct maiden AC drilling at
Balla Balla in H1 2025. Mapping and sampling
campaigns are also planned to continue along prioritised areas of
the Tabba Tabba Shear Corridor in the EGC and at
Miralga.
Smaller and more targeted follow up sampling and
mapping is planned on the antimony targets at Sherlock
Crossing and Southeast Wyloo. This work is designed to
delineate maiden RC drill programs to test scale and tenor of
possible mineralisation, to be drilled in conjunction with the
Karratha District drill targets.
Harding Dam JV
In December 2023, Novo entered into a tenement
sale agreement, joint venture agreement, and coordination agreement
with SQM Australia Pty Ltd (SQM)7, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A., in relation to five of
Novo’s prospective lithium and nickel exploration tenements
(Priority Tenements) in the West Pilbara. SQM paid Novo A$10
million (C$8.84 million) for a 75% interest in the Priority
Tenements with Novo retaining a 25% interest, along with 100%
ownership of the gold, silver, PGE, copper, lead and zinc mineral
rights.
SQM have a 12-month period to elect to include
additional Novo Pilbara tenements7 in the joint venture on the same
terms. A decision on these option tenements is due by mid-December
2024.
Tenement Rationalisation
The Company’s exploration programs across key
Pilbara areas continue to identify priority targets for exploration
follow-up drilling. At the same time, these exploration programs
recognise tenure that provides little further exploration value or
follow-up.
As a result, tenure which does not complement
Novo’s exploration strategy continues to be relinquished to reduce
land tenure holding costs. The Company currently manages an
estimated ~5,500 sq km of 100% owned tenure, of which 465 sq km is
under Joint Venture. In addition, ~1,650 sq km of tenure forms the
Egina Joint Venture (De Grey) or Harding Dam Battery Metal Joint
Venture (SQM Priority 1 tenements), both managed by JV partners.
Novo has reduced annual holding costs by engaging Joint Ventures,
or by relinquishing or divesting tenure of limited
prospectivity.
Authorised for release by the Board of
Directors.
CONTACT
Investors:Mike Spreadborough +61 8 6400 6100
info@novoresources.com |
North American Queries:Leo Karabelas+1 416 543
3120leo@novoresources.com |
Media:Cameron Gilenko+61 466 984
953cameron.gilenko@sodali.com |
QP STATEMENT
Ms. Karen (Kas) De Luca (MAIG), is the qualified
person, as defined under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of
Disclosure for Mineral Projects, responsible for, and having
reviewed and approved, the technical information contained in this
news release. Ms De Luca is Novo’s General Manager Exploration.
JORC COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
The information in this news release that
relates to new exploration results at Novo’s projects in the
Pilbara is based on information compiled by Ms De Luca, who is a
full-time employee of Novo Resources Corp. Ms De Luca is a
Competent Person who is a member of the Australian Institute of
Geoscientists. Ms De Luca has sufficient experience that is
relevant to the style of mineralisation and the type of deposits
under consideration and to the activity being undertaken to qualify
as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the
'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral
Resources and Ore Reserves'. Ms De Luca consents to the inclusion
in the report of the matters based on her information in the form
and context in which it appears.
The information in this news release that
relates to previously reported exploration results at Novo’s
projects in the Pilbara is extracted from each of Novo
announcements referred to in endnotes 1 – 4 below that were
released to ASX, and which are available to view at www.asx.com.au.
The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information
that materially affects the information included in the original
market announcements and that all material assumptions and
technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the relevant
market announcement continue to apply and have not materially
changed.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some statements in this news release may contain
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Canadian and
Australian securities law and regulations. In this news release,
such statements include but are not limited to planned exploration
activities and the timing of such. These statements address future
events and conditions and, as such, involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual
results, performance or achievements to be materially different
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by the statements. Such factors include, without
limitation, customary risks of the resource industry and the risk
factors identified in Novo’s annual information form for the year
ended December 31, 2023 (which is available under Novo’s profile on
SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and at www.asx.com.au) in the Company’s
prospectus dated 2 August 2023 which is available at
www.asx.com.au. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the
date those statements are made. Except as required by applicable
law, Novo assumes no obligation to update or to publicly announce
the results of any change to any forward-looking statement
contained or incorporated by reference herein to reflect actual
results, future events or developments, changes in assumptions or
changes in other factors affecting the forward-looking statements.
If Novo updates any forward-looking statement(s), no inference
should be drawn that the Company will make additional updates with
respect to those or other forward-looking statements.
______________________________1 Refer to
announcement dated 29 August 2024 – Nunyerry North High-Grade Gold
Zone extended and Egina Gold Camp exploration targets advanced
(released to ASX on 30 August 2024).2 Refer to announcement dated 1
May 2024 – Follow-Up Drilling to Commence at Nunyerry North and New
Targets Defined Near Karratha (released to ASX on 2
May 2024).3 Maitland, a Gibb (1919) Antimony deposits in Western
Australia, Geological Survey of Western Australia, State Government
of Western Australia4 Refer to announcement dated 11 September 2024
– Evaluation of Pilbara Antimony Gold Potential Generates Positive
Results.5 Refer to announcement dated 15 August 2024 – Exploration
to Expand into the East Pilbara (released to ASX on 16 August
2024).6 Refer to announcement dated 10 October 2024 – De Grey
Reaches A$7M Minimum Spend at Egina Gold Project and Continues
Investment.7 Refer to announcement dated 18 December 2023 –
Strategic Joint Venture with Global Lithium Produced SQM.8.Refer to
De Grey’s ASX announcement, Hemi Gold Project Resource Update,
dated 21 November 2023. No assurance can be given that a similar
(or any) commercially viable mineral deposit will be determined at
Novo’s Becher Project.
ABOUT NOVO
Novo is an Australian based gold explorer listed
on the ASX and the TSX focused on discovering standalone gold
projects with > 1 Moz development potential. Novo is an
innovative gold explorer with a significant land package covering
approximately 5,500 square kilometres in the Pilbara region of
Western Australia, along with the 22 square kilometre Belltopper
project in the Bendigo Tectonic Zone of Victoria, Australia.
Novo’s key project area is the Egina Gold Camp,
where De Grey Mining (ASX: DEG) is farming-in to form a JV at the
Becher Project and surrounding tenements through exploration
expenditure of A$25 million within 4 years for a 50% interest. The
Becher Project has similar geological characteristics as De Grey’s
12.7 Moz Hemi Project8. Novo is also advancing gold exploration at
Nunyerry North, part of the Croydon JV (Novo 70%: Creasy Group
30%), where 2023 exploration drilling identified significant gold
mineralisation. Novo continues to undertake early-stage exploration
across its Pilbara tenement portfolio.
Novo has also formed lithium joint ventures with
SQM in the Pilbara which provides shareholder exposure to battery
metals.
Novo has a significant investment portfolio and
a disciplined program in place to identify value accretive
opportunities that will build further value for shareholders.
Please refer to Novo’s website for further
information including the latest corporate presentation.
An Exploration Target as defined in the JORC
Code (2012) is a statement or estimate of the exploration potential
of a mineral deposit in a defined geological setting where the
statement or estimate, quoted as a range of tonnes and a range of
grade (or quality), relates to mineralisation for which there has
been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral Resource.
Accordingly, these figures are not Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve
estimates as defined in the JORC Code (2012). The potential
quantities and grades referred to above are conceptual in nature
and there has been insufficient exploration to estimate a Mineral
Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in
the estimation of a Mineral Resource. These figures are based on
the interpreted continuity of mineralisation and projection into
unexplored ground often around historical workings. The Exploration
Target has been prepared in accordance with the JORC Code (2012).
as detailed in the Company’s ASX announcement released on 25
September 2024 (available to view at www.asx.com.au). The Tonnage
range for the exploration target is 1.5Mt to 2.1Mt, the Grade range
is 6.6g/t Au to 8.4g/t Au and the Ounces range from 320koz Au to
570 koz Au. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new
information that material affects the information included in the
original market announcement and that all material assumptions and
technical parameters underpinning the estimates in the original
market announcement continue to apply and have not materially
changed. Dr Christopher Doyle (MAIG) and Dr Simon Dominy (FAusIMM
CPGeo; FAIG RPGeo), are the qualified persons, as defined under
National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects, responsible for, and having reviewed and approved, the
technical information relating to the exploration target. Dr Doyle
is Novo’s Exploration Manager - Victoria and Dr Dominy is a
Technical Advisor to Novo.
Appendix 1
Surface sample results for the Tabba Tabba Shear
Corridor Project, listing all significant results for soil samples
(> 20 ppb Au) (All sample locations are GPS located on
MGA_2020 zone 50)
Sample ID |
Type |
Prospect |
Au (ppb) |
Easting |
Northing |
J3702 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
794 |
603,433 |
7,638,209 |
J2733 |
Soil |
Molisana |
653 |
598,424 |
7,639,782 |
J2277 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
463 |
591,087 |
7,618,430 |
J3174 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
428 |
603,293 |
7,638,121 |
J3906 |
Soil |
Regional |
316 |
606,149 |
7,627,273 |
J2305 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
306 |
589,968 |
7,619,031 |
J3563 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
299 |
603,102 |
7,637,418 |
J3687 |
Soil |
Molisana |
281 |
597,241 |
7,640,298 |
J3466 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
270 |
604,124 |
7,638,873 |
J2479 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
250 |
590,927 |
7,618,551 |
J2071 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
239 |
591,728 |
7,618,190 |
J2751 |
Soil |
Molisana |
205 |
598,094 |
7,638,733 |
J2093 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
165 |
591,248 |
7,618,230 |
J3497 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
155 |
604,131 |
7,638,421 |
J3158 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
146 |
603,451 |
7,637,079 |
J3572 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
130 |
602,907 |
7,637,604 |
J3113 |
Soil |
Molisana |
120 |
598,260 |
7,641,653 |
J3918 |
Soil |
Regional |
107 |
606,230 |
7,626,953 |
J2909 |
Soil |
Molisana |
100 |
597,709 |
7,638,449 |
J2219 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
95 |
591,568 |
7,618,110 |
J3171 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
94 |
603,501 |
7,637,475 |
J2206 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
93 |
591,568 |
7,617,630 |
J3189 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
91 |
603,692 |
7,637,736 |
J3781 |
Soil |
Molisana |
90 |
596,874 |
7,640,223 |
J3888 |
Soil |
Regional |
87 |
606,710 |
7,627,113 |
J3178 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
81 |
603,409 |
7,638,011 |
J3207 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
73 |
603,273 |
7,637,474 |
J3498 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
68 |
604,104 |
7,638,449 |
J2210 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
68 |
591,568 |
7,617,789 |
J2204 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
68 |
591,570 |
7,617,551 |
J3491 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
66 |
603,993 |
7,638,333 |
J3566 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
65 |
603,053 |
7,637,466 |
J2252 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
65 |
591,407 |
7,618,669 |
J3224 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
64 |
603,298 |
7,637,895 |
J3479 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
64 |
603,648 |
7,638,667 |
J2483 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
64 |
590,928 |
7,618,389 |
J3821 |
Soil |
Regional |
62 |
606,149 |
7,627,513 |
J2941 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
61 |
601,564 |
7,635,931 |
J3676 |
Soil |
Molisana |
59 |
596,921 |
7,640,058 |
J3705 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
58 |
603,518 |
7,638,126 |
J2454 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
58 |
591,248 |
7,618,830 |
J3487 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
57 |
603,878 |
7,638,445 |
J2942 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
56 |
601,585 |
7,635,914 |
J3655 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
56 |
604,161 |
7,638,393 |
J3204 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
55 |
603,190 |
7,637,554 |
J3159 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
50 |
603,168 |
7,636,558 |
J2703 |
Soil |
Molisana |
49 |
598,388 |
7,641,749 |
J2057 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
49 |
591,746 |
7,617,670 |
J3814 |
Soil |
Molisana |
47 |
597,201 |
7,639,762 |
J2742 |
Soil |
Molisana |
46 |
598,384 |
7,639,350 |
J3152 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
45 |
603,279 |
7,637,245 |
J3042 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
45 |
603,341 |
7,636,963 |
J3169 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
45 |
603,472 |
7,637,503 |
J2894 |
Soil |
Molisana |
45 |
597,901 |
7,637,790 |
J2284 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
44 |
589,326 |
7,619,070 |
J2480 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
44 |
590,930 |
7,618,511 |
J2928 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
42 |
601,496 |
7,635,858 |
J3219 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
41 |
603,184 |
7,638,006 |
J3164 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
41 |
603,358 |
7,637,614 |
J3857 |
Soil |
Regional |
41 |
606,471 |
7,627,353 |
J2707 |
Soil |
Molisana |
41 |
598,283 |
7,641,278 |
J2473 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
41 |
590,927 |
7,618,589 |
J3226 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
40 |
603,351 |
7,637,841 |
J3769 |
Soil |
Molisana |
39 |
597,227 |
7,640,486 |
J3592 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
39 |
603,710 |
7,638,384 |
J2756 |
Soil |
Molisana |
38 |
597,775 |
7,638,495 |
J2205 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
38 |
591,568 |
7,617,589 |
J3717 |
Soil |
Molisana |
37 |
596,946 |
7,639,671 |
J3477 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
36 |
603,588 |
7,638,724 |
J3911 |
Soil |
Regional |
36 |
606,308 |
7,627,033 |
J2878 |
Soil |
Molisana |
36 |
597,805 |
7,638,118 |
J2884 |
Soil |
Molisana |
36 |
598,189 |
7,638,005 |
J2876 |
Soil |
Molisana |
35 |
597,742 |
7,638,070 |
J2877 |
Soil |
Molisana |
35 |
597,773 |
7,638,094 |
J2726 |
Soil |
Molisana |
35 |
598,175 |
7,640,396 |
J2268 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
34 |
590,766 |
7,618,990 |
J2278 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
34 |
591,089 |
7,618,390 |
J2940 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
33 |
601,548 |
7,635,948 |
J3469 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
33 |
603,869 |
7,638,897 |
J2710 |
Soil |
Molisana |
32 |
598,092 |
7,641,135 |
J2091 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
32 |
591,253 |
7,618,151 |
J3461 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
31 |
603,976 |
7,639,238 |
J3304 |
Soil |
Molisana |
30 |
596,784 |
7,639,751 |
J3798 |
Soil |
Molisana |
30 |
597,296 |
7,639,937 |
J3118 |
Soil |
Molisana |
30 |
598,290 |
7,640,877 |
J2218 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
30 |
591,568 |
7,618,070 |
J3776 |
Soil |
Molisana |
29 |
597,035 |
7,640,344 |
J2221 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
29 |
591,568 |
7,618,150 |
J3899 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
28 |
603,378 |
7,640,878 |
J3773 |
Soil |
Molisana |
28 |
597,131 |
7,640,415 |
J3253 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
28 |
604,956 |
7,639,850 |
J2481 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
28 |
590,929 |
7,618,470 |
J2943 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
27 |
601,600 |
7,635,897 |
J3658 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
27 |
603,570 |
7,638,296 |
J2874 |
Soil |
Molisana |
27 |
597,678 |
7,638,022 |
J2708 |
Soil |
Molisana |
27 |
598,218 |
7,641,231 |
J2313 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
27 |
589,807 |
7,619,430 |
J3225 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
26 |
603,325 |
7,637,867 |
J3168 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
26 |
603,445 |
7,637,531 |
J3112 |
Soil |
Molisana |
26 |
598,194 |
7,641,605 |
J3172 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
25 |
603,559 |
7,637,420 |
J3712 |
Soil |
Molisana |
25 |
596,815 |
7,639,576 |
J2887 |
Soil |
Molisana |
25 |
598,125 |
7,637,957 |
J3136 |
Soil |
Molisana |
25 |
598,178 |
7,640,001 |
J2747 |
Soil |
Molisana |
25 |
598,352 |
7,638,925 |
J2369 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
25 |
589,646 |
7,618,828 |
J2231 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
25 |
591,248 |
7,618,470 |
J2216 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
25 |
591,567 |
7,617,990 |
J3675 |
Soil |
Molisana |
24 |
596,888 |
7,640,034 |
J3084 |
Soil |
Molisana |
24 |
597,238 |
7,638,891 |
J3283 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
24 |
603,953 |
7,639,039 |
J3268 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
24 |
604,817 |
7,639,763 |
J2237 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
24 |
591,247 |
7,618,270 |
J2056 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
24 |
591,746 |
7,617,630 |
J3039 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
23 |
601,445 |
7,635,769 |
J3180 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
23 |
603,464 |
7,637,955 |
J3526 |
Soil |
Molisana |
23 |
596,785 |
7,639,352 |
J3792 |
Soil |
Molisana |
23 |
597,458 |
7,640,057 |
J2892 |
Soil |
Molisana |
23 |
597,966 |
7,637,838 |
J2889 |
Soil |
Molisana |
23 |
598,061 |
7,637,910 |
J3255 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
23 |
604,899 |
7,639,905 |
J2297 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
23 |
590,127 |
7,619,070 |
J2054 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
23 |
591,728 |
7,617,550 |
J3037 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
22 |
601,410 |
7,635,802 |
J3707 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
22 |
603,575 |
7,638,070 |
J3872 |
Soil |
Regional |
22 |
606,788 |
7,627,193 |
J3763 |
Soil |
Molisana |
22 |
596,957 |
7,640,486 |
J3200 |
Soil |
Molisana |
22 |
597,750 |
7,639,274 |
J2886 |
Soil |
Molisana |
22 |
598,157 |
7,637,982 |
J2198 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
22 |
591,408 |
7,618,550 |
J2926 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
21 |
601,533 |
7,635,824 |
J3209 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
21 |
603,333 |
7,637,415 |
J3704 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
21 |
603,490 |
7,638,153 |
J3659 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
21 |
603,600 |
7,638,269 |
J3866 |
Soil |
Regional |
21 |
606,389 |
7,627,193 |
J3094 |
Soil |
Molisana |
21 |
596,782 |
7,638,953 |
J3484 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
21 |
603,821 |
7,638,498 |
J3494 |
Soil |
No 6 Bore |
21 |
604,078 |
7,638,250 |
J2062 |
Soil |
Nunyerry North |
21 |
591,727 |
7,617,870 |
J2697 |
Soil |
Cantwell's Court |
20 |
599,449 |
7,629,453 |
J3027 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
20 |
601,347 |
7,635,730 |
J3591 |
Soil |
Kilkenny |
20 |
603,681 |
7,638,411 |
J3883 |
Soil |
Regional |
20 |
607,029 |
7,627,113 |
J3073 |
Soil |
Molisana |
20 |
596,882 |
7,638,628 |
Appendix 2
Surface sample results for the Tabba Tabba Shear
Corridor Project, listing all significant results for rock samples
(> 0.1 ppm Au) (All sample locations are GPS located on
MGA_2020 zone 50)
Sample ID |
Type |
Prospect |
Au (ppm) |
Easting |
Northing |
R07910 |
Rock Chip |
Kilkenny |
3.77 |
602,035 |
7,636,482 |
R07304 |
Rock Chip |
Kilkenny |
2.00 |
602,821 |
7,636,704 |
R07334 |
Rock Chip |
Malvern Hills |
1.84 |
607,375 |
7,644,726 |
R07312 |
Rock Chip |
Kilkenny |
1.03 |
602,460 |
7,636,734 |
R07333 |
Rock Chip |
Malvern Hills |
0.95 |
607,372 |
7,644,736 |
R07326 |
Rock Chip |
Malvern Hills |
0.53 |
607,376 |
7,644,715 |
R07306 |
Rock Chip |
Kilkenny |
0.52 |
602,797 |
7,636,741 |
R07505 |
Rock Chip |
Cantwell's Court |
0.33 |
599,272 |
7,635,272 |
R07302 |
Rock Chip |
Kilkenny |
0.31 |
602,798 |
7,636,751 |
R07303 |
Rock Chip |
Kilkenny |
0.22 |
602,811 |
7,636,751 |
R07300 |
Rock Chip |
Kilkenny |
0.14 |
602,774 |
7,636,756 |
R07301 |
Rock Chip |
Kilkenny |
0.14 |
602,875 |
7,636,746 |
R07318 |
Rock Chip |
Kilkenny |
0.14 |
602,508 |
7,636,818 |
R07906 |
Rock Chip |
Kilkenny |
0.12 |
602,556 |
7,636,776 |
R07305 |
Rock Chip |
Kilkenny |
0.11 |
602,789 |
7,636,675 |
R07412 |
Rock Chip |
No 6 Bore |
0.11 |
604,130 |
7,638,656 |
Appendix 3
Surface rock sample results for Sherlock Crossing,
listing elements relevant to this mineralisation style(All
sample locations are GPS located on MGA_2020 zone 50)
Sample ID |
Type |
Prospect |
Au (ppm) |
Sb (ppm) |
Easting |
Northing |
R07353 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
0.02 |
61 |
563,405 |
7,675,092 |
R07354 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
3.62 |
112 |
563,368 |
7,675,076 |
R07355 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
0.28 |
115 |
563,364 |
7,675,075 |
R07356 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
35.30 |
47,375 |
563,368 |
7,675,068 |
R07357 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
146.72 |
31,090 |
563,374 |
7,675,069 |
R07358 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
0.11 |
273 |
563,357 |
7,675,051 |
R07360 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
0.97 |
211 |
563,363 |
7,675,057 |
R07361 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
13.36 |
4,782 |
563,367 |
7,675,086 |
R07362 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
0.05 |
55 |
562,707 |
7,674,852 |
R07363 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
0.02 |
390 |
562,657 |
7,674,159 |
R07364 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
0.009 |
320 |
562,641 |
7,674,191 |
R07365 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
0.004 |
38 |
562,639 |
7,674,225 |
R07366 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
0.02 |
35 |
562,562 |
7,673,495 |
R07367 |
Rock Chip |
Sherlock Crossing |
0.04 |
43 |
562,569 |
7,673,442 |
Appendix 4
Surface sample results for the Miralga Project, listing
all significant results for soil samples > 10 ppb Au or > 100
ppm Cu for elements relevant to this mineralisation
style(All sample locations are GPS located on MGA_2020
zone 50)
Sample ID |
Type |
Prospect |
Au(ppb) |
Cu(ppm) |
Ag(ppm) |
Pb(ppm) |
Sb(ppm) |
Zn(ppm) |
Easting |
Northing |
J4703 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
89 |
69 |
0.07 |
24 |
1.0 |
59 |
761,880 |
7,656,480 |
J4755 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
71 |
86 |
0.06 |
7 |
0.5 |
25 |
761,601 |
7,656,160 |
J4711 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
52 |
133 |
0.08 |
65 |
1.6 |
42 |
761,880 |
7,656,400 |
J4480 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
49 |
97 |
0.03 |
14 |
0.5 |
27 |
761,720 |
7,656,200 |
J4688 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
48 |
107 |
0.09 |
40 |
1.9 |
22 |
761,839 |
7,656,361 |
J4687 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
44 |
87 |
0.20 |
33 |
1.2 |
39 |
761,881 |
7,656,361 |
J4737 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
38 |
95 |
0.17 |
34 |
1.4 |
34 |
761,880 |
7,656,320 |
J4661 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
34 |
76 |
0.06 |
34 |
1.0 |
48 |
761,881 |
7,656,440 |
J4106 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
32 |
139 |
0.10 |
14 |
1.3 |
94 |
761,880 |
7,657,080 |
J4553 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
31 |
99 |
0.03 |
7 |
0.4 |
34 |
761,641 |
7,655,960 |
J4702 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
28 |
55 |
0.03 |
18 |
0.8 |
43 |
761,841 |
7,656,480 |
H9636 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
26 |
250 |
0.10 |
20 |
0.5 |
32 |
761,648 |
7,656,278 |
J2808 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
25 |
48 |
0.03 |
5 |
0.4 |
45 |
761,480 |
7,655,400 |
J4712 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
24 |
98 |
0.07 |
16 |
1.3 |
32 |
761,841 |
7,656,400 |
J4483 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
23 |
202 |
0.03 |
8 |
0.6 |
27 |
761,600 |
7,656,200 |
J4944 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
23 |
27 |
0.03 |
6 |
0.5 |
22 |
761,559 |
7,655,719 |
J4736 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
22 |
132 |
0.07 |
146 |
1.9 |
38 |
761,841 |
7,656,320 |
J4618 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
20 |
94 |
0.03 |
14 |
2.1 |
161 |
762,081 |
7,656,600 |
J4472 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
20 |
49 |
0.06 |
7 |
0.6 |
65 |
762,040 |
7,656,200 |
J4088 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
4 |
848 |
0.03 |
9 |
0.7 |
48 |
762,000 |
7,657,242 |
J4028 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
5 |
417 |
0.06 |
11 |
0.8 |
36 |
762,041 |
7,657,320 |
J4911 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
338 |
0.03 |
6 |
0.7 |
39 |
761,679 |
7,656,519 |
J4794 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
9 |
308 |
0.03 |
6 |
0.6 |
36 |
761,520 |
7,655,840 |
J4555 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
7 |
300 |
0.09 |
5 |
0.3 |
32 |
761,720 |
7,655,960 |
J4181 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
276 |
0.06 |
9 |
0.7 |
64 |
761,839 |
7,656,998 |
J4126 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
275 |
0.03 |
8 |
0.6 |
54 |
761,761 |
7,656,920 |
J4125 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
273 |
0.03 |
7 |
1.0 |
56 |
761,801 |
7,656,920 |
J4108 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
6 |
260 |
0.05 |
11 |
0.8 |
38 |
761,961 |
7,657,080 |
J4027 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
4 |
240 |
0.17 |
21 |
0.9 |
35 |
762,082 |
7,657,320 |
J4089 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
5 |
239 |
0.07 |
7 |
0.7 |
41 |
761,960 |
7,657,239 |
J4941 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
237 |
0.06 |
4 |
0.4 |
100 |
761,695 |
7,655,720 |
J4604 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
234 |
0.07 |
7 |
0.5 |
109 |
761,760 |
7,656,760 |
J4656 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
224 |
0.03 |
9 |
0.5 |
31 |
761,680 |
7,656,440 |
J4790 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
4 |
220 |
0.03 |
6 |
0.5 |
54 |
761,521 |
7,655,920 |
J4923 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
6 |
200 |
0.03 |
6 |
0.6 |
36 |
761,519 |
7,655,879 |
J4629 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
196 |
0.03 |
6 |
0.4 |
36 |
761,681 |
7,656,599 |
J4327 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
9 |
193 |
0.06 |
24 |
0.7 |
44 |
761,960 |
7,656,679 |
J4079 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
192 |
0.05 |
9 |
0.6 |
23 |
762,038 |
7,657,399 |
J4029 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
8 |
186 |
0.03 |
8 |
0.6 |
31 |
762,000 |
7,657,320 |
J4744 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
15 |
179 |
0.03 |
13 |
0.4 |
31 |
761,641 |
7,656,240 |
J4597 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
176 |
0.03 |
13 |
0.9 |
22 |
761,680 |
7,656,480 |
J4087 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
6 |
165 |
0.07 |
9 |
0.7 |
28 |
762,039 |
7,657,240 |
J4609 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
4 |
164 |
0.06 |
7 |
0.4 |
58 |
761,960 |
7,656,760 |
H9631 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
1 |
164 |
0.03 |
6 |
0.4 |
39 |
761,479 |
7,656,279 |
J4334 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
163 |
0.03 |
8 |
0.5 |
62 |
761,677 |
7,656,678 |
J4168 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
6 |
159 |
0.12 |
34 |
0.6 |
60 |
762,040 |
7,657,157 |
J4310 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
151 |
0.03 |
7 |
1.0 |
121 |
761,798 |
7,656,838 |
J4787 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
11 |
149 |
0.08 |
5 |
0.4 |
91 |
761,640 |
7,655,920 |
J4484 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
140 |
0.03 |
5 |
0.9 |
34 |
761,560 |
7,656,199 |
J4080 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
137 |
0.03 |
7 |
0.5 |
66 |
762,079 |
7,657,399 |
J4596 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
133 |
0.03 |
7 |
0.5 |
25 |
761,640 |
7,656,480 |
J4592 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
133 |
0.15 |
7 |
0.9 |
39 |
761,521 |
7,656,480 |
J4621 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
128 |
0.03 |
12 |
0.7 |
89 |
762,000 |
7,656,600 |
J4708 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
7 |
127 |
0.67 |
38 |
1.4 |
63 |
762,000 |
7,656,400 |
J4314 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
10 |
121 |
0.14 |
7 |
0.5 |
44 |
761,959 |
7,656,834 |
J4624 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
120 |
0.03 |
8 |
0.5 |
76 |
761,881 |
7,656,600 |
J4574 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
10 |
119 |
0.03 |
5 |
0.6 |
25 |
761,520 |
7,655,800 |
J4767 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
8 |
117 |
0.03 |
4 |
0.4 |
26 |
761,599 |
7,656,080 |
J4662 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
5 |
117 |
0.08 |
18 |
0.7 |
81 |
761,920 |
7,656,440 |
J4000 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
117 |
0.18 |
18 |
0.7 |
45 |
762,120 |
7,657,320 |
J4748 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
117 |
0.03 |
6 |
0.5 |
27 |
761,520 |
7,656,240 |
J2843 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
116 |
0.03 |
10 |
0.5 |
23 |
761,481 |
7,655,560 |
J4554 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
115 |
0.09 |
10 |
0.3 |
43 |
761,680 |
7,655,960 |
J4078 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
113 |
0.03 |
7 |
0.7 |
29 |
761,999 |
7,657,399 |
J4090 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
3 |
111 |
0.03 |
7 |
0.7 |
29 |
761,921 |
7,657,240 |
J4726 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
1 |
111 |
0.03 |
7 |
0.4 |
33 |
761,480 |
7,656,319 |
J4481 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
11 |
110 |
0.03 |
18 |
0.4 |
46 |
761,680 |
7,656,200 |
J4686 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
10 |
110 |
1.76 |
129 |
2.9 |
93 |
761,921 |
7,656,359 |
J4333 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
5 |
109 |
0.03 |
4 |
0.3 |
53 |
761,719 |
7,656,677 |
H9632 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
109 |
0.03 |
8 |
0.5 |
52 |
761,519 |
7,656,279 |
J4728 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
1 |
109 |
0.03 |
7 |
0.4 |
39 |
761,561 |
7,656,320 |
H9637 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
13 |
107 |
0.13 |
22 |
0.5 |
27 |
761,679 |
7,656,278 |
J3999 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
5 |
107 |
0.64 |
56 |
0.9 |
96 |
762,161 |
7,657,320 |
J4732 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
11 |
106 |
0.03 |
13 |
0.6 |
21 |
761,721 |
7,656,320 |
J4109 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
5 |
106 |
0.03 |
15 |
0.4 |
24 |
762,000 |
7,657,080 |
J2812 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
2 |
106 |
0.03 |
5 |
0.4 |
59 |
761,321 |
7,655,400 |
H9639 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
11 |
105 |
0.08 |
22 |
0.7 |
26 |
761,759 |
7,656,278 |
J4030 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
5 |
104 |
0.09 |
7 |
0.6 |
36 |
761,960 |
7,657,320 |
J4107 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
8 |
102 |
0.06 |
9 |
0.7 |
46 |
761,920 |
7,657,080 |
J4182 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
4 |
101 |
0.03 |
7 |
0.9 |
43 |
761,799 |
7,657,000 |
J3998 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
9 |
100 |
0.03 |
6 |
0.6 |
39 |
762,001 |
7,657,480 |
H9630 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
1 |
100 |
0.09 |
9 |
0.6 |
44 |
761,439 |
7,656,279 |
J4782 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
13 |
98 |
0.06 |
7 |
0.4 |
58 |
761,720 |
7,656,001 |
J4717 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
10 |
92 |
0.03 |
188 |
0.5 |
37 |
761,679 |
7,656,400 |
J4710 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
13 |
89 |
0.96 |
97 |
2.2 |
76 |
761,922 |
7,656,400 |
J4742 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
15 |
84 |
0.05 |
24 |
0.6 |
29 |
761,720 |
7,656,240 |
H9641 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
12 |
83 |
1.31 |
17 |
5.4 |
36 |
761,838 |
7,656,278 |
J4186 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
15 |
74 |
0.07 |
6 |
0.6 |
52 |
761,676 |
7,656,999 |
J4669 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
13 |
73 |
0.09 |
10 |
0.6 |
47 |
761,920 |
7,656,520 |
J4704 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
18 |
71 |
0.09 |
11 |
0.7 |
75 |
761,920 |
7,656,480 |
J4738 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
14 |
67 |
0.53 |
61 |
1.3 |
78 |
761,921 |
7,656,320 |
J4668 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
19 |
58 |
0.06 |
13 |
0.6 |
52 |
761,880 |
7,656,520 |
J4694 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
12 |
56 |
0.10 |
9 |
0.8 |
43 |
761,599 |
7,656,360 |
J4036 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
10 |
54 |
0.03 |
7 |
0.4 |
49 |
761,760 |
7,657,318 |
J4713 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
10 |
53 |
0.03 |
27 |
1.0 |
18 |
761,801 |
7,656,400 |
J4660 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
11 |
48 |
0.06 |
17 |
0.8 |
40 |
761,840 |
7,656,440 |
J4804 |
Soil |
Shady Camp West |
10 |
27 |
0.05 |
5 |
0.3 |
23 |
761,441 |
7,655,680 |
Appendix 5
Surface sample results for the Miralga Project, listing
all significant results for rock samples > 20 ppb Au or > 200
ppm Cu for elements relevant to this mineralisation
style(All sample locations are GPS located on MGA_2020
zone 50)
Sample ID |
Type |
Prospect |
Au(ppm) |
Cu(ppm) |
Ag(ppm) |
Pb(ppm) |
Sb(ppm) |
Zn(ppm) |
Easting |
Northing |
R07919 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
1.16 |
694 |
0.59 |
11 |
1.0 |
33 |
761,597 |
7,656,143 |
NVO-9292 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.37 |
40 |
0.18 |
17 |
3.6 |
19 |
761,754 |
7,656,318 |
R07935 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.27 |
458 |
0.23 |
3 |
1.3 |
58 |
761,885 |
7,656,598 |
R07390 |
Rock chip |
Gully Washer |
0.13 |
830 |
1.04 |
1,053 |
79.7 |
1,154 |
757,805 |
7,665,895 |
R07948 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.12 |
56 |
1.46 |
69 |
2.9 |
11 |
762,009 |
7,657,050 |
R07920 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.10 |
874 |
0.26 |
25 |
8.0 |
233 |
761,588 |
7,656,113 |
R07918 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.05 |
43,735 |
1.69 |
11 |
5.6 |
35 |
761,575 |
7,656,187 |
R07392 |
Rock chip |
Gully Washer |
0.02 |
2,288 |
1.11 |
3,631 |
109.7 |
1,625 |
758,042 |
7,665,652 |
R07386 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.01 |
2,999 |
0.06 |
260 |
7.8 |
184 |
762,012 |
7,657,145 |
NVO-9291 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.01 |
1,480 |
0.09 |
10 |
6.3 |
33 |
761,667 |
7,656,299 |
NVO-9278 |
Rock chip |
Gully Washer |
0.01 |
472 |
5.25 |
1,999 |
13.5 |
9,034 |
757,523 |
7,665,855 |
R07940 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.002 |
1,038 |
0.36 |
3 |
1.3 |
30 |
761,071 |
7,654,810 |
R07934 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
< LOD |
1,325 |
0.32 |
24 |
3.8 |
61 |
761,685 |
7,656,549 |
R07944 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.01 |
1,115 |
0.31 |
7 |
4.1 |
104 |
761,786 |
7,656,895 |
R07923 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.08 |
365 |
0.12 |
12 |
3.5 |
241 |
761,674 |
7,655,833 |
NVO-9293 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.07 |
37 |
0.44 |
48 |
4.2 |
11 |
761,786 |
7,656,314 |
R07929 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.07 |
96 |
0.08 |
66 |
0.7 |
16 |
761,741 |
7,656,447 |
R07916 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.06 |
138 |
0.07 |
92 |
5.6 |
89 |
761,885 |
7,656,400 |
R07922 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.02 |
643 |
0.07 |
3 |
3.5 |
45 |
761,267 |
7,655,209 |
R07933 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.02 |
552 |
0.17 |
16 |
1.9 |
100 |
761,687 |
7,656,495 |
NVO-9280 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.02 |
468 |
0.28 |
19 |
3.0 |
125 |
761,491 |
7,655,670 |
R07947 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.02 |
207 |
0.23 |
38 |
1.1 |
22 |
761,986 |
7,657,058 |
R07913 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.01 |
287 |
0.05 |
9 |
3.8 |
25 |
762,019 |
7,657,236 |
NVO-9286 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.01 |
671 |
0.08 |
6 |
2.5 |
74 |
761,716 |
7,656,103 |
NVO-9281 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.004 |
317 |
0.08 |
8 |
2.3 |
149 |
761,305 |
7,655,238 |
R07939 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.004 |
314 |
0.38 |
3 |
5.1 |
113 |
761,090 |
7,654,807 |
R07914 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.003 |
472 |
0.23 |
26 |
4.6 |
9 |
761,663 |
7,656,304 |
R07946 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.003 |
396 |
0.20 |
13 |
4.4 |
226 |
761,868 |
7,657,071 |
NVO-9288 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.002 |
313 |
0.08 |
1 |
2.3 |
90 |
761,605 |
7,655,796 |
R07930 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.002 |
369 |
0.20 |
4 |
0.7 |
55 |
761,680 |
7,656,455 |
R07937 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.002 |
844 |
< LOD |
6 |
0.8 |
231 |
761,704 |
7,656,674 |
R07938 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.002 |
258 |
0.44 |
4 |
1.0 |
116 |
761,686 |
7,656,671 |
R07943 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.002 |
351 |
0.11 |
12 |
3.0 |
193 |
761,756 |
7,656,906 |
NVO-9283 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
0.001 |
231 |
0.09 |
3 |
1.7 |
30 |
761,308 |
7,655,229 |
R07388 |
Rock chip |
Shady Camp West |
< LOD |
799 |
0.91 |
11 |
3.0 |
40 |
761,463 |
7,656,331 |
R07532 |
Rock chip |
Gully Washer |
< LOD |
209 |
0.16 |
3 |
1.6 |
161 |
757,965 |
7,667,233 |
R07533 |
Rock chip |
Gully Washer |
< LOD |
364 |
0.14 |
2 |
8.0 |
36 |
758,050 |
7,667,193 |
R07534 |
Rock chip |
Gully Washer |
< LOD |
252 |
0.11 |
12 |
9.1 |
322 |
758,158 |
7,666,983 |
Appendix 6 - JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table
1
Section 1: Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this
section.)
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Sampling techniques |
- Nature and quality of sampling (e.g., cut channels, random
chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools
appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples
should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
- Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample
representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement
tools or systems used.
- Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are
Material to the Public Report.
- In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this
would be relatively simple (e.g., ‘reverse circulation drilling was
used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more
explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold
that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g., submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed information.
|
- Rock chips samples were collected by
grab sampling 1 – 3 kg of material which were dispatched to
Intertek Genalysis, Western Australia for analysis. Sample sites
were selected based to be representative on the lithology sampled,
and the same sampling technique was employed at each sample site
where possible. Rock sample results are typically intended
to complement geological mapping, except for Sherlock Crossing,
where rock samples selected to validate historic high grades from
mining activities.
- Soil samples of 200 g were collected
from small pits 2 cm – 20 cm depth and sieved to <80#. All soils
were analysed via aqua regia digest and assayed for 33 elements,
including gold (AR25/MS33)
- pXRF readings of soils were taken at
Miralga to inform <80# soil sampling using a NITON XLT5 model
and were used to aid field interpretation and identification of
anomalous target mineralogy and pathfinder elements. The Niton pXRF
machine was calibrated daily.
|
Drilling techniques |
- Drill type (e.g., core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer,
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g.,
core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails,
face-sampling bit, or other type, whether core is oriented and if
so, by what method, etc).
|
- No drilling was undertaken.
|
Drill sample recovery |
- Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample
recoveries and results assessed.
- Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the samples.
- Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade
and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential
loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
|
- No drilling was undertaken.
|
Logging |
- Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
- Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core
(or costean, channel, etc) photography.
- The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections
logged.
|
- No drilling was undertaken.
|
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
- If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all
core taken.
- If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc
and whether sampled wet or dry.
- For all sample types, the nature, quality, and appropriateness
of the sample preparation technique.
- Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages
to maximise representivity of samples.
- Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of
the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half sampling.
- Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the
material being sampled.
|
- Rock chip samples were dried, crushed and pulverised (SP64) by
Intertek Genalysis to create a 50 g charge, then assayed for Au by
fire assay FA50/MS and for 48 elements using four acid digest – MS
finish (4A/MS).
- Soil samples required no prep and were analysed for 32 elements
by aqua regia digest with MS finish (lab method AR25/MS).
- pXRF readings of soils were taken using a NITON XLT5 model and
were used to aid field interpretation and identification of
anomalous target mineralogy and pathfinder elements. The Niton pXRF
machine was calibrated daily.
- The sampling techniques and sample sizes are considered
appropriate for this style of mineralisation.
|
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
- The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and
laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered
partial or total.
- For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments,
etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including
instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors
applied and their derivation, etc.
- Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g., standards,
blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether
acceptable levels of accuracy (if lack of bias) and precision have
been established.
|
- The rock chip sample assay methodology is considered
appropriate for the style of mineralisation tested. The method
includes inserting 2 CRM standards and 2 blanks per 100 samples or
at least one of each per sample submission.
- The soil sample assay methodology has low level detection for
gold and multi-elements and is considered appropriate for soil
geochemistry for outcropping or near surface mineralisation. The
method includes insertion of at least 2 blanks 2 CRM standards and
4 field duplicates per 100 samples.
- pXRF readings of soils were taken using a NITON XLT5 model and
were used to aid field interpretation and identification of
anomalous target mineralogy and pathfinder elements. This is
appropriate for first pass reconnaissance and anomaly definition.
The machine is calibrated daily and at least four CRMs are inserted
per 100 samples and at the start and end of the day.
- No QAQC issues were detected.
|
Verification of sampling and assaying |
- The verification of significant intersections by either
independent or alternative company personnel.
- The use of twinned holes.
- Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data
verification, data storage (physical and electronic)
protocols.
- Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
|
- Primary data was collected in the field and stored using
database compatible excel templates which were then forwarded to
the database manager email for upload to the Geobank (v2022.5)
database, buffered through a validation portal that ensures code
and primary record compliance. Geobank is a front-end UX/UI tender
software platform (developed and sold by Micromine) attached to a
SQL v15.1 server.
- Assay data were loaded from lab certificates received from the
registered laboratory by an internal database manager or external
database consultant, and industry-standard audit trails and
chain-of-custody was adhered to.
- Verification included checking the data against original logs
and utilising laboratory certificates.
- No adjustments of the assay data were made.
|
Location of data points |
- Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes
(collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other
locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.
- Specification of the grid system used.
- Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
|
- All surface sample reconnaissance
locations were recorded in by hand-held GPS using the GDA 2020 zone
50 co-ordinate system.
|
Data spacing and distribution |
- Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.
- Whether the data spacing, and distribution is sufficient to
establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate
for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s)
and classifications applied.
- Whether sample compositing has been applied.
|
- Limited rock samples are taken and are indicative of potential
grade tenor. These do not necessarily represent or imply any
continuity or scale potential.
- Soil samples at the Tabba Tabba prospects were taken on a
nominal grid of 40 m by 160 m orientated to be perpendicular to the
interpreted strike of the system, with minimal infill conducted at
20 m x 80 m.
- pXRF and soil sample grids at Shady Camp West (Miralga) were
taken at a nominal spacing of 40 m by 80 m, with infill soil
sampling conducted at 40 m by 40 m.
|
Orientation of data in relation to geological structure |
- Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling
of possible structures and the extent to which this is known,
considering the deposit type.
- If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if
material.
|
- pXRF soil and soil sample grids were orientated to best
intersect the lithological and structural trends at right angles.
For regional targets, these orientations are not known until the
first pass geochemical data is corrected. Infill sampling is
completed to better cover the extent of possible
mineralisation.
|
Sample security |
- The measures taken to ensure sample security.
|
- All samples are stored and managed on site by internal staff.
Samples are then transported by reputable companies to a registered
laboratory where they are stored in a locked facility before being
tracked and processed through the preparation and analysis system
at the laboratory.
|
Audits or reviews |
- The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and
data.
|
- No audits have been undertaken.
|
Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this
section.)
Criteria |
JORC Code explanation |
Commentary |
Mineral tenement and land tenure status |
- Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including
agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint
ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
- The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along
with any known impediments to obtaining a license to operate in the
area.
|
- The Gully Washer and Shady Camp West prospects are part of the
Miralga Project and are located on Exploration License E45/4922,
approximately 25 km west of Marble Bar. The tenement is 100% held
by Nullagine Gold Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Novo, and
is in good standing
- There are no known Registered Heritage Sites within this
tenement.
- A geological heritage site is located within the Dresser
Formation and relates to Archean stromatolites. A larger reserve is
planned to further expand the protection of these oldest fossils.
As the geological heritage site is related to the Dresser Formation
where stromatolites occur, it is not expected to impact on the
remainder of the tenement prospective for porphyry
mineralisation.
- The prospects fall under the granted Nyamal Native Title
determination WC1999/008 and is subject to a land access and
mineral exploration agreement with the Nyamal Aboriginal
Corporation.
- The Tabba Tabba Shear Corridor comprises ten granted tenements
and three tenement applications held by Meentheena Gold Pty Ltd,
Grant’s Hill Gold Pty Ltd, or Nullagine Gold Pty Ltd, all wholly
owned subsidiaries of Novo.
- Tenements E47/3467, E47/2973, and tenement application E47/5155
are under Joint Venture with the Creasy Group, where Creasy retains
a 30% interest.
- The tenure falls under the granted Nyamal Native Title
determination WC1999/014 and is subject to a land access and
mineral exploration agreement with the Yindjibarndi Aboriginal
Corporation.
- An access agreement is not yet in place with the Mugarinya
group to access the Yandeyarra Reserve over E47/3467, although
discussions are progressing
- Sherlock Crossing is located on Exploration License E47/3825,
held Karratha Gold Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Novo
Resources.
- The prospect falls under the granted Ngarluma Native Title
determination WC1999/014 and is subject to a land access and
mineral exploration agreement with the Nglaruma Aboriginal
Corporation.
- There are several Registered Heritage Sites within this
tenement, however not overlapping with the immediate exploration
area.
|
Exploration done by other parties |
- Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other
parties.
|
Miralga:
- In 1969 – 1970, Anglo American conducted a large stream
sampling program comprising 1,345 samples, analysed for Cu, Ni, Pb,
and Zn.
- AMAX conducted surface sampling and costeaning during 1980 and
1981, delineating the Fred’s Well Creek prospect.
- Haoma Mining explored the district from 1998 to 2018, mostly
focussing on the North Pole prospect outside of current Novo
tenure, and various small barite deposits.
- Sipa Resources explored the current Gully Washer prospect and
conducted surface rock sampling and drilled six shallow RC drill
holes. Results include up to 20.7 g/t Au from rock sampling and a
best of 1 m at 6.22 ppm Au from RC chips.
Tabba Tabba Shear Corridor:
- Numerous companies had worked in the general area in the past
including CRA Exploration Pty Ltd Explored, 1981 (A10873) &
1995-1995 (A44168, A47363), Mark Creasy, 1996 (A47385), Kilkenny
Gold NL, 1998 (A54099, A54394) and 2004 (A68128), Bullion
Minerals-Farno McMahon Pty Ltd, 2008 (A77811, A81531)
- 2016 - 2018 Rockford Metals Ltd (Creasy Group). Rockford Metals
were the first company to define the Nunyerry North Prospect as a
target. Upon granting, geological reconnaissance, rock chip, soil
and stream sampling was completed targeting gold associated with
the Mallina Formation, quartz veins within Archean mafic/ultramafic
greenstone belt rocks and regional locations.
- In 2018, an aeromagnetic/radiometric survey was completed over
the Nunyerry Project by Rockford Metals Ltd at 30 m sensor height
and 50 m line spacing for a total of 21,829-line kilometres.
Sherlock Crossing:
- Aarex 1997 (A53516 – A49869) collected thirty-five samples from
outcrop or from the dump surrounding the main historical excavation
at the Clarke Mine. The highest sample result was 84.8 g/t gold
which averaged 68.5 g/t over four assays.
- Ascent Mining 2002 (A66185) - collected twenty-one rock chip
samples from Sherlock Crossing, located at the site of the
historical Clarkes antimony mine, returning up to 98.8 g/t Au and
0.83% antimony
- Ourwest Corp 2007 (A76553) – collected eleven rock chip samples
which gave peak results of 3.78 g/t Au and 1390 ppm Sb.
- No other known work of relevance has been undertaken by other
parties.
|
Geology |
- Deposit type, geological setting, and style of
mineralisation.
|
- The Miralga Project is located on the eastern flank of the
North Pole Dome. The North Pole monzogranite has intruded an
Archean sequence of mafic to felsic volcanics and volcaniclastics
and is prospective for porphyry-style and epithermal vein-style
mineralisation within the Panorama Formation. Known porphyry
mineralisation is present outside of Novo’s tenure at Miralga Creek
B, where Au-Ag-Cu mineralisation is associated with a stock-like
Archaean porphyry, high-level dykes and epithermal veins.
- The Tabba Tabba Shear Corridor is a 60 km northeast trending
corridor of anastomosing shear zones. Several flexures in zones of
structural complexity or around more rigid stratigraphy are being
explored for mineralisation. The Fortescue overlies parts of the
Corridor.
- Sherlock Crossing is orogenic Au-Sb vein hosted mineralisation
along a major N to NNE trending structure, hosted in basalt to
ultramafic rocks of the Archaean Louden Volcanics (2.95 Ma).
Mineralisation occurs in poorly outcropping zones of sheeted to
stockwork quartz veins with stibnite and gold on the eastern flood
plain of the Sherlock River.
|
Drill hole Information |
- A summary of all information material to the understanding of
the exploration results including a tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill holes, including Easting and
northing of the drill hole collar, Elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar, dip
and azimuth of the hole, down hole length and interception depth
plus hole length.
- If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis
that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not
detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person
should clearly explain why this is the case.
|
- No drilling was undertaken.
|
Data aggregation methods |
- In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging
techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g., cutting
of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should
be stated.
- Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of
high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the
procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some
typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in
detail.
- The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent
values should be clearly stated.
|
- No drilling was undertaken.
|
Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept
lengths |
- These relationships are particularly important in the reporting
of Exploration Results.
- If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill
hole angle is known, its nature should be reported.
- If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported,
there should be a clear statement to this effect (e.g., ‘down hole
length, true width not known’).
|
- No drilling was undertaken.
- Rock sample results are indicative in nature and, whilst
representatively sampling the target lithology, do not contain any
width or length information other than a qualitative description of
the target.
|
Diagrams |
- Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being
reported. These should include, but not be limited to a plan view
of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional
views.
|
- Refer to the body of the release for appropriate maps and
diagrams.
|
Balanced reporting |
- Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades
and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
|
- Due to the large number of samples, not all results are
reported in Appendices 1, 2, 4, and 5, with a representative cut
off selected for each project and sample type.
- For Sherlock Crossing, all rock samples are reported.
- When not all samples are included in the relevant appendix, the
excluded samples are clearly shown and labelled in the Figures in
the body of the release.
- pXRF results are not listed in an appendix, and not released as
absolute numbers. These results are utilised by the field geologist
to determine the design of the follow up soil sample grids.
|
Other substantive exploration data |
- Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be
reported including (but not limited to): geological observations;
geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk
samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results;
bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating substances.
|
|
Further work |
- The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g., tests for
lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out
drilling).
- Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions,
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information is not commercially
sensitive.
|
- Refer to the body of the release.
|
No Section 3 or 4 report as no Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves
are reported in this Appendix
Figures accompanying this announcement are available at
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/96b803af-ed72-482f-9c62-7cc901f3a9c7https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/1f4e4107-7abc-4072-b0c8-d1f358cd5ac0https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/0c1e314b-a28a-48de-9aea-f47f1b3efdaehttps://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/a0de1d96-229f-4311-b60d-08299f395dcbhttps://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/40512dfd-98f9-4dd7-9154-20f26b4a0af3https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/72374aa5-05f9-4fc9-ba97-e2c161238bfdhttps://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/78188191-d6fd-4d93-bd76-fd3de87b3683https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/95397563-4193-4af3-8ba6-2d3ec934c82dhttps://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/2977fc08-3d7d-4049-8201-52a6defc6fddhttps://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/fb1d3896-711d-43fc-ac7e-bbfd94cb0ad4
Novo Resources (TSX:NVO.WT)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Nov 2024 até Dez 2024
Novo Resources (TSX:NVO.WT)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Dez 2023 até Dez 2024