NASDAQ:EU
TSXV:EU
www.encoreuranium.com
DALLAS, Feb. 27,
2025 /PRNewswire/ - enCore Energy Corp.
(NASDAQ: EU) (TSXV: EU) (the "Company" or "enCore"), America's
Clean Energy Company™, announces the filing of Technical Report
Summaries ("TRS") prepared in accordance with U.S. Securities &
Exchange Commission ("SEC") Regulation S-K 1300 of the Securities
Exchange Act ("S-K 1300") for four of its key uranium projects: the
Alta Mesa Uranium Project ("Alta Mesa Project"), the Mesteña Grande
Uranium Project ("Mesteña Grande Project"), the South Texas
Integrated Uranium Projects ("South Texas Project") and the Gas
Hills Uranium Project ("Gas Hills Project"). These reports provide
updated mineral resource estimates and preliminary economic
assessments ("PEA") in accordance with SEC disclosure
requirements.

As of January 1, 2025, enCore is
reporting all mineral resources in accordance with Item 1302 of S-K
1300 in addition to Canadian National Instrument 43-101 ("NI
43-101"). S-K 1300 was adopted by the SEC to modernize mineral
property disclosure requirements for mining registrants and to
align United States ("U.S.")
disclosure requirements for mineral properties more closely with
current industry and global regulatory standards. The transition to
also reporting under S-K 1300 aligns enCore's disclosures with U.S.
regulatory standards, ensuring consistency and transparency for
investors.
About the Alta Mesa Project and Mesteña Grande
Project
The Alta Mesa Project, and the Mesteña Grande
Project are located in South Texas,
USA. The TRS filings prepared under S-K 1300 disclose a
mineral resource and preliminary economic assessment* for the
Company's uranium projects located in South Texas. The reports provide the
following:
- The Alta Mesa Project's estimated capital costs are
$25.9 M and includes $2.5 M to complete refurbishment of the Alta Mesa
Central Processing Plant ("CPP") and $23.4 M for
wellfield development.
-
- Operating costs are estimated to be $27.44 per pound of U3O8.
The basis for operating costs is planned development, production
sequence, production quantity, and past production experience.
Operating costs include plant and wellfield operations, product
transactions, administrative support, decontamination and
decommissioning ("D&D"), and restoration.
- Taxes, royalties, and other interests are applicable to
production and revenue. Total federal income tax is estimated at
$18.8 M for a cost per pound
U3O8 of $9.13.
The state of Texas does not impose
a corporate income tax, but the Alta Mesa Project is subject to
property taxes in the form of ad valorem in the amount of
$0.62 M or $0.30 per pound of U3O8.
The Alta Mesa Project is subject to a cumulative 3.0% surface and
mineral royalty at an average life of mine ("LOM") sales price of
$83.43 per lb.
U3O8 for $5.4 M or $2.61 per pound.
- The economic analysis assumes that 80% of the mineral resources
are recoverable. The pre-tax net cash flow incorporates estimated
sales revenue from recoverable uranium, less costs for surface and
mineral royalties, property tax, plant and wellfield operations,
product transactions, administrative support, D&D and
restoration. The after-tax analysis includes the above information
plus amortized development costs, depreciated plant and wellfield
capital costs, existing and forecasted operating losses to estimate
federal income tax.
- Less federal tax, the Alta Mesa Project's cash flow is
estimated at $83.3 M or $42.89 per pound
U3O8. Using an 8% discount rate, the
Alta Mesa Project's NPV is $66.4 M. The Alta Mesa Project's after-tax
cash flow is estimated at $64.9 M for a cost per pound
U3O8 of $52.03.
Using an 8.0% discount rate, the Alta Mesa Project's NPV is
$51.6 M.
- The Mesteña Grande Project's estimated capital costs are
$108.1 M and includes $13.7 M for processing facilities and
$94.4 M for wellfield
development.
-
- Operating costs are estimated to be $25.49 per pound of U3O8.
The basis for operating costs is planned development, production
sequence, production quantity, and past production experience.
Operating costs include plant and wellfield operations, product
transactions, administrative support, D&D, and
restoration.
- Taxes, royalties, and other interests are applicable to
production and revenue. Total federal income tax is estimated at
$90.1 M for a cost per pound
U3O8 of $10.82.
The state of Texas does not impose
a corporate income tax, but the Mesteña Grande Project is subject
to property taxes in the form of ad valorem in the amount of
$2.5 M or $0.30 per pound of U3O8.
This project is subject to a cumulative 3.6% surface and mineral
royalty at an average LOM sales price of $85.48 per lb. U3O8 for
$30.0 M or $3.60 per pound.
- The economic analysis assumes that 60% of the mineral resources
are recoverable. The pre-tax net cash flow incorporates estimated
sales revenue from recoverable uranium, less costs for surface and
mineral royalties, property tax, plant and wellfield operations,
product transactions, administrative support, D&D and
restoration. The after-tax analysis includes the above information
plus depreciated plant and wellfield capital costs, to estimate
federal income tax.
- Less federal tax, the Mesteña Grande Project's cash flow is
estimated at $366.6 M or $41.48 per pound U3O8.
Using an 8% discount rate, the Mesteña Grande Project's NPV is
$205.8 M. The Mesteña Grande
Project's after-tax cash flow is estimated at $276.5 M for a cost per pound
U3O8 of $53.18.
Using an 8.0% discount rate, the Mesteña Grande Project's NPV is
$154.4 M.
- Both the Alta Mesa Project and the Mesteña Grande Project
are located entirely within private land holdings of the Jones
Ranch in South Texas. The Jones
Ranch is an approximately 380,000-acre ranch that was founded in
1897, and enCore controls over 200,000 of the 380,000 acres with
mineral leases and options for uranium exploration and
development.
- The Alta Mesa Project is an established In-Situ Recovery
("ISR") uranium project with a CPP and wellfields undergoing
extraction operations in PAA7. The Alta Mesa CPP and mine office
are located at the Alta Mesa property approximately 22 miles south
of the town of Falfurrias. The Alta Mesa CPP and wellfield
operations are located on a 4,598-acre mining lease adjacent to the
198,000+ acres Mesteña Grande exploration option. The Alta Mesa
wellfields and CPP are located entirely in Brooks County, Texas.
- The Mesteña Grande Project is an exploration-stage ISR uranium
project comprised of multiple prospective areas within the region
and primarily located northwest of the Alta Mesa operations within
the 198,000+ acre exploration option. enCore plans to develop
and advance the Mesteña Grande Project and process uranium at the
Alta Mesa CPP. The Mesteña Grande exploration projects are in both
Brooks and Jim Hogg Counties, Texas.
- Uranium mineralization at both the Alta Mesa and Mesteña Grande
projects occur as roll-front deposits hosted in permeable
sandstones of the Miocene Catahoula, the Miocene Oakville, and the
Pliocene Goliad Formations. Significant additional potential exists
both regionally and within the wellfield boundary within the Goliad
Formation at depths between 400 and 600 feet, within the Oakville
Formation at depths between 800 and 1300 feet, and within the
Catahoula Formation to the west at depths between 450 and 600 feet.
Only 5% of the Mesteña Grande Project areas have been explored,
with previous exploration efforts having identified 52 linear miles
of stacked reduction/oxidation ("REDOX") fronts, with only 5 miles
of the REDOX fronts closely drilled out to date.
*The above preliminary economic assessments are
preliminary in nature, and include inferred mineral resources that
are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic
considerations applied to them that would enable them to be
categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the
preliminary economic assessments will be
realized.
|
Alta Mesa Project Mineral Resource Summary
Alta Mesa Project Inferred Mineral Resource Summary
Category
|
Tons (x
1,000)
|
Avg Grade (%)
U3O8
|
Total Lbs. (x 1000)
U3O8
|
Measured
|
263.7
|
0.136
|
691.4
|
Indicated
|
630.0
|
0.150
|
1,894.5
|
Total Measured and
Indicated
|
894.0
|
0.145
|
2,585.9
|
Inferred
|
2,223.4
|
0.112
|
5,200.5
|
Total
Inferred
|
2,223.4
|
0.112
|
5,200.5
|
Notes:
|
1.
|
enCore reports mineral
reserves and mineral resources separately. Reported mineral
resources do not include mineral reserves.
|
2.
|
The geological model
used is based on geological interpretations on section and plan
derived from surface drillhole information.
|
3.
|
Mineral resources have
been estimated using a minimum grade-thickness cut-off of 0.30 ft%
U3O8.
|
4.
|
Mineral resources are
estimated based on the use of ISR for mineral
extraction.
|
5.
|
Inferred mineral
resources are estimated with a level of sampling sufficient to
determine geological continuity but less confidence in grade and
geological interpretation such that inferred resources cannot be
converted to mineral reserves.
|
6.
|
Mineral resources that
are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
|
Mesteña Grande Project Mineral Resource Summary
Mesteña Grande Project Inferred Mineral Resource
Summary
Category
|
Tons (x
1,000)
|
Avg Grade (%)
U3O8
|
Total Lbs. (x 1000)
U3O8
|
Measured
|
0.0
|
0.000
|
0.0
|
Indicated
|
0.0
|
0.000
|
0.0
|
Total Measured and
Indicated
|
0.0
|
0.000
|
0.0
|
Inferred
|
5,852.8
|
0.119
|
13,887.9
|
Total
Inferred
|
5,852.8
|
0.119
|
13,887.9
|
Notes:
|
1.
|
enCore reports mineral
reserves and mineral resources separately. Reported mineral
resources do not include mineral reserves.
|
2.
|
The geological model
used is based on geological interpretations on section and plan
derived from surface drillhole information.
|
3.
|
Mineral resources have
been estimated using a minimum grade-thickness cut-off of 0.30 ft%
U3O8.
|
4.
|
Mineral resources are
estimated based on the use of ISR for mineral
extraction.
|
5.
|
Inferred mineral
resources are estimated with a level of sampling sufficient to
determine geological continuity but less confidence in grade and
geological interpretation such that inferred resources cannot be
converted to mineral reserves.
|
6.
|
Mineral resources that
are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
|
Alta Mesa and Mesteña Grande Technical Report
Summaries
The TRS entitled "Alta Mesa Uranium Project,
Brooks County, Texas, USA" dated
February 19, 2025, with an effective
date of December 31, 2024, was
prepared and signed by SOLA Project Services, LLC, 4912 Stoneridge
Way, Casper, Wyoming 82601, with
Stuart Bryan Soliz, being the
Qualified Person for the purposes of NI 43-101 and S-K 1300.
The TRS entitled "Mesteña Grande Uranium Project, Brooks and Jim
Hogg Counties, Texas, USA"
dated February 19, 2025, with an
effective date of December 31, 2024,
was prepared and signed by SOLA Project Services, LLC., 4912
Stoneridge Way, Casper, Wyoming
82601, with Stuart Bryan Soliz,
being the Qualified Person for the purposes of NI 43-101 and S-K
1300.
The TRS filing for each of the Alta Mesa Project and the Mesteña
Grande Project was prepared pursuant to S-K 1300 and filed with the
SEC as an exhibit to a Current Report on Form 8-K. In addition, a
separate TRS for each project was prepared in accordance with the
form requirements under Canadian NI 43-101 and was filed with
Canadian securities regulators on SEDAR+.
About the South Texas Integrated Properties
Project
This filing discloses a mineral resource and PEA for
the Company's key pipeline ISR uranium projects located in
South Texas. The report provides
the following:
- Combined Measured and Indicated Resources for the South Texas
Project are 3,527,000 lbs. U3O8, with
Inferred Resources of 308,000 lbs. U3O8.
- The PEA indicates a pre-tax net present value ("NPV") of
$104.3 million at an 8% discount
rate. When income taxes are included in the calculation, the after
tax NPV is $81.8 million at an 8%
discount rate. The mine plan and economic analysis are based on the
following assumptions:
- A recovery factor of 80% on the measured and indicated mineral
resource (inferred mineral resource was excluded).
- A variable U3O8 sales price ranging from
$78.37/lb. up to $92.04/lb. with an overall average
U3O8 sales price of $87.05/lb.
- A mine life of nine years (six years production followed by
three years of restoration/surface reclamation); and
- A pre-income tax cost including royalties, state and local
taxes, operating costs, and capital costs of $43.12/lb.
- The South Texas Project consists of five project areas:
- The Rosita CPP, including the Cadena ISR Project
("Rosita South - Cadena ISR Project"
or "Cadena"), Butler Ranch Uranium ISR Project ("Butler Ranch"),
Upper Spring Creek - Brevard Area ISR Uranium Project
("USC – Brevard" or "Brevard"), Upper
Spring Creek - Brown Area ISR Uranium Project ("USC – Brown" or "Brown"). The South Texas Project's
properties are located in Karnes,
Bee, Live Oak and Duval Counties, Texas, USA.
- The Rosita CPP will serve as the central location and
uranium processing facility for the South Texas Project, with the
other project areas serving as wellfields with remote ion exchange
facilities. The Rosita CPP will process all uranium bearing resin
from each of the other South Texas Project areas. The South Texas
Project extracts uranium using ISR technology (see below).
- enCore currently controls over 5,724 acres in total within
region. Mineral rights for the South Texas Project are all private
(fee) mineral leases and/or owned by URI, Inc. ("URI"), a wholly
owned subsidiary of enCore. Fee mineral leases are obtained through
negotiation with individual mineral owners. The uranium mineral
resource estimates for the South Texas Project are based on data
from 4,523 drill holes that included survey coordinates, collar
elevations, depths and grade/grade thickness of uranium
intercepts.
South Texas Properties Mineral Resource Summary
*The in-place resources were estimated separately for
each project area. Tables list the Project resources by the project
area. The effective date of the resource estimate is December
31, 2024.
|
South Texas Uranium Project Measured and Indicated Resource
Summary*
Project
Area
|
GT
Cutoff
|
Average
GT
|
Uranium (lbs.
U3O8)
|
Upper Spring Creek –
Brevard Area
|
Measured
|
0.3
|
0.59
|
800,000
|
Indicated
|
0.3
|
0.40
|
38,000
|
Total Measured and
Indicated
|
-
|
-
|
838,000
|
Upper Spring Creek –
Brown Area
|
Measured
|
0.3
|
1.17
|
1,339,000
|
Indicated
|
0.2
|
2.15
|
720,000
|
Total Measured and
Indicated
|
-
|
-
|
2,059,000
|
Rosita South -
Cadena
|
Measured
|
0.3
|
0.80
|
615,000
|
Indicated
|
0.3
|
0.42
|
15,000
|
Total Measured and
Indicated
|
-
|
-
|
630,000
|
Project
Totals
|
Measured
|
|
2,754,000
|
Indicated
|
|
773,000
|
Total Measured and
Indicated
|
|
3,527,000
|
Notes:
|
1.
|
Mineral resources as
defined in 17 CFR § 229.1300 and as used in NI 43-101.
|
2.
|
All resources occur
below the static water table.
|
3.
|
The point of reference
for mineral resources is in-situ at the Project.
|
4.
|
Mineral resources that
are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
|
5.
|
An 80% metallurgical
recovery factor was considered for the purposes of the economic
analysis.
|
6.
|
There are no measured
or indicated resources at Rosita CPP or Butler Ranch.
|
South Texas Uranium Project Inferred Resource
Summary*
Project
Area
|
GT
Cutoff
|
Average
GT
|
U3O8 (lbs.)
|
Upper Spring Creek –
Brown Area
|
Total
Inferred
|
0.2
|
1.35
|
308,000
|
Notes:
|
1.
|
Mineral resources as
defined in 17 CFR § 229.1300 and as used in NI 43-101.
|
2.
|
All resources occur
below the static water table.
|
3.
|
The point of reference
for mineral resources is in-situ at the Project.
|
4.
|
Mineral resources that
are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
|
5.
|
There are no inferred
resources at Rosita CPP, Butler Ranch, Brevard or
Cadena.
|
South Texas Properties Technical Report
Summary
The TRS, entitled "Technical Report on the
South Texas Integrated Uranium Projects Texas, USA" with an
effective date of December 31, 2024
(referred to herein as the "South Texas TRS"), was prepared under
S-K 1300 and filed with the SEC as a Current Report on Form 8-K. In
addition, the South Texas TRS was prepared in accordance with the
form requirements under NI 43-101 and was filed with Canadian
securities regulators on SEDAR+. The South Texas TRS was prepared
by WWC Engineering, 1849 Terra Avenue, Sheridan, WY 82801, with Christopher McDowell, P.G. and Ray Moores, P.E.,
being the Qualified Persons for the purposes of NI 43-101 and S-K
1300.
About the Gas Hills Project
The Gas Hills Project is located in Fremont and Natrona Counties, in Wyoming, USA. The Gas Hills TRS discloses a
mineral resource and PEA for the Company's key pipeline ISR uranium
project. The report provides the following:
- Measured and Indicated ISR Resources for the Gas Hills
Project are 7,705,000 lbs. U3O8 for the
current project areas, with Inferred ISR Resource for the Gas Hills
Project of 428,000 lbs. U3O8.
- The PEA indicates a pre-tax NPV of $166.9 million at an 8% discount rate with an
internal rate of return ("IRR") of 54.8% compared to an after-tax
NPV of $141.8 million at an 8%
discount rate with an IRR of 50.2%. The mine plan and economic
analysis are based on the following assumptions:
- A recovery factor of 80% of the measured and indicated mineral
resource (no inferred mineral resource is included);
- A U3O8 sales price of $87.00/lb.;
- A mine life of 11 years;
- A pre-income tax cost including royalties, state and local
taxes, operating costs, and capital costs of $40.61/lb.; and
- Initial capital costs $55.2
million.
- The Company's 100% owned Gas Hills Project is one
of enCore's development priorities following the focus
on production in South Texas, and
Dewey-Burdock (refer to the separate TRS news release for
Dewey-Burdock here:
https://encoreuranium.com/news/encore-energy-files-dewey-burdock-s-k-1300-technical-resource-summary/).
- The Gas Hills Project consists of approximately 1,280 surface
acres and 12,960 net mineral acres of unpatented lode mining
claims, a state of Wyoming mineral
lease, and private mineral leases, within a brownfield site
which has experienced extensive development including mine and mill
site cumulative production in excess of 100 million pounds of
uranium, mainly from open-pit mining, but also from underground
mining and ISR.
Gas Hills Project Mineral Resource Summary
Note - The mineral resource estimation method utilized in
this report is the Grade Thickness (GT) contour method. This method
is considered appropriate for this type of deposit.
Gas Hills Project Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource
Summary
December 31, 2024,
Combined (GT cutoff 0.10)
|
|
Pounds
|
Tons
|
Avg. Grade
|
Avg.
Thickness
|
Avg. GT
|
Measured
|
2,051,000
|
994,000
|
0.10 %
|
5.35
|
0.552
|
Indicated
|
8,713,000
|
6,031,000
|
0.07 %
|
6.13
|
0.443
|
Total
M&I
|
10,764,000
|
7,025,000
|
0.08 %
|
6.05
|
0.463
|
December 31, 2024, ISR
Only (GT cutoff 0.10)
|
|
Pounds
|
Tons
|
Avg. Grade
|
Avg.
Thickness
|
Avg. GT
|
Measured
|
2,051,000
|
994,000
|
0.10 %
|
5.35
|
0.552
|
Indicated
|
5,654,000
|
2,835,000
|
0.10 %
|
4.92
|
0.491
|
Total
M&I
|
7,705,000
|
3,829,000
|
0.10 %
|
4.99
|
0.502
|
December 31, 2024,
Non-ISR Only (GT cutoff 0.10)
|
|
Pounds
|
Tons
|
Avg. Grade
|
Avg.
Thickness
|
Avg. GT
|
Indicated
|
3,059,000
|
3,196,000
|
0.05 %
|
8.6
|
0.412
|
Total
M&I
|
3,059,000
|
3,196,000
|
0.05 %
|
8.6
|
0.412
|
Notes:
|
1.
|
Mineral resources as
defined in 17 CFR § 229.1300 and as used in NI 43-101.
|
2.
|
All ISR Only resources
occur below the static water table.
|
3.
|
The point of reference
for mineral resources is in-situ at the Project.
|
4.
|
Mineral resources that
are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
|
5.
|
An 80% metallurgical
recovery factor was considered for the purposes of the economic
analysis.
|
6.
|
Totals may not sum due
to rounding.
|
Gas Hills Project Inferred Mineral Resource Summary
December 31, 2024,
Combined (GT cutoff 0.10)
|
|
Pounds
|
Tons
|
Avg. Grade
|
Avg.
Thickness
|
Avg. GT
|
Inferred
|
490,000
|
514,000
|
0.05 %
|
6.16
|
0.293
|
December 31, 2024, ISR
Only (GT cutoff 0.10)
|
|
Pounds
|
Tons
|
Avg. Grade
|
Avg.
Thickness
|
Avg. GT
|
Inferred
|
428,000
|
409,000
|
0.05 %
|
5.94
|
0.31
|
December 31, 2024,
Non-ISR Only (GT cutoff 0.10)
|
|
Pounds
|
Tons
|
Avg. Grade
|
Avg.
Thickness
|
Avg. GT
|
Inferred
|
62,000
|
105,000
|
0.03 %
|
7.01
|
0.208
|
Notes:
|
1.
|
Mineral resources as
defined in 17 CFR § 229.1300 and as used in NI 43-101.
|
2.
|
All ISR Only resources
occur below the static water table.
|
3.
|
The point of reference
for mineral resources is in-situ at the Project.
|
4.
|
Mineral resources that
are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
|
5.
|
Totals may not sum due
to rounding.
|
Gas Hills Technical Report Summary
The TRS, entitled
"Technical Report on the Gas Hills Uranium Project, Fremont and Natrona Counties Wyoming, USA" with an
effective date of December 31, 2024
(referred to herein as the "Gas Hills TRS"), was prepared under S-K
1300 and filed with the SEC on Form 8-K. In addition, the Gas Hills
TRS was prepared in accordance with the form requirements under NI
43-101 and was filed with Canadian securities regulators on SEDAR.
The Gas Hills TRS was prepared by WWC Engineering, 1849 Terra
Avenue, Sheridan, WY 82801, with
Christopher McDowell, P.G. and Ray
Moores, P.E., being the Qualified Persons for the purposes of NI
43-101 and S-K 1300.
Technical Disclosure and Qualified Person
All
technical information in this news release was approved by
John M. Seeley, Ph.D., P.G., C.P.G.,
enCore's Manager of Geology and Exploration, and a Qualified Person
of the Company and a Qualified Person as defined in NI 43-101 and
S-K 1300.
About In-Situ Recovery Technology
In-Situ Recovery
offers a minimally intrusive, eco-friendly, and economically
competitive approach to mineral extraction. It's been proven to be
a successful technique for obtaining uranium that replaces
conventional open pit or underground workings with wellfield
technology. ISR does not involve open pits, waste dumps, or
tailings, making it more environmentally considerate. This method
also streamlines the permitting, development, and remediation
processes. With ISR, uranium is extracted without disturbing the
surface, and once the process is complete, the land is restored to
its original state and purpose.
About enCore Energy Corp.
enCore Energy Corp.,
America's Clean Energy Company™, is committed to providing clean,
reliable, and affordable fuel for nuclear energy as the only
United States uranium producer
with multiple extraction facilities in operation. The enCore team
is led by industry experts with extensive knowledge and experience
in all aspects of In-Situ Recovery uranium operations and the
nuclear fuel cycle. enCore solely utilizes ISR for uranium
extraction, a well-known and proven technology co-developed by the
leaders at enCore Energy.
Following upon enCore's demonstrated success in South Texas, future projects in enCore's
pipeline include the Dewey-Burdock project in South Dakota and the Gas Hills Project in
Wyoming. The Company holds other
non-core assets including significant New
Mexico resources and conventional projects in Arizona, Utah
and Wyoming along with proprietary
databases. enCore is committed to working with local communities
and indigenous governments to create positive impact from corporate
developments.
Learn more at www.encoreuranium.com.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements:
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release.
This press release contains "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995 and Canadian securities laws that are based on management's
current expectations, assumptions and beliefs. Forward-looking
statements can often be identified by such words as "will",
"expects", "plans", "believes", "intends", "estimates", "projects",
"continue", "potential", and similar expressions or variations
(including negative variations) of such words and phrases, or
statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could",
or "will" be taken.
Forward-looking statements and information that are not
statements of historical fact include, but are not limited to, any
information relating to statements regarding future or potential
extraction, and any other statements regarding future expectations,
beliefs, goals or prospects, statements regarding the potential for
future extraction at each of the projects, the success of current
and future ISR operations, including projects in our pipeline, our
future extraction plans and associated economics, including the
assumptions underlying the economic analyses, initial economic
assessment of the projects, continued demonstration of robust
economics of the projects, after-tax NPVs, project IRRs, that
the projects will be a reliable supplier of fuel, that the Rosita
CPP will process all the mineral mined on each of the other South
Texas Project areas, the expected timing of a commercial operation,
estimated mineral resources and financials, expected major plant
aspects that the projects will be successfully operable ISR
operations and our commitment to working with local communities and
indigenous governments to create positive impact from corporate
developments should be considered forward-looking
statements. All such forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future results and forward-looking statements are
subject to important risk factors and uncertainties, many of which
are beyond the Company's ability to control or predict, that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in
any forward looking statement, including those described in greater
detail in our filings with the SEC and on SEDAR+, particularly
those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Forward-looking
statements necessarily involve known and unknown risks, including,
without limitation, risks associated with assumptions regarding
project economics; discount rates; expenditures and the current
cost environment; timing and schedule of the projects, general
economic conditions; adverse industry events; future legislative
and regulatory developments; the ability of enCore to implement its
business strategies; and other risks. A number of important factors
could cause actual results or events to differ materially from
those indicated or implied by such forward-looking statements,
including without limitation exploration and development risks,
changes in commodity prices, access to skilled personnel, the
results of exploration and development activities; extraction
risks; uninsured risks; regulatory risks; defects in title; the
availability of materials and equipment, timeliness of government
approvals and unanticipated environmental impacts on operations;
litigation risks; risks posed by the economic and political
environments in which the Company operates and intends to operate;
increased competition; assumptions regarding market trends and the
expected demand and desires for the Company's products and proposed
products; reliance on industry equipment manufacturers, suppliers
and others; the failure to adequately protect intellectual
property; the failure to adequately manage future growth; adverse
market conditions, the failure to satisfy ongoing regulatory
requirements and factors relating to forward looking statements
listed above which include risks as disclosed in the Company's
filings on SEDAR+ and with the SEC, including its management
discussion and analysis and annual information form. Should one or
more of these risks materialize, or should assumptions underlying
the forward-looking statements prove incorrect, actual results may
vary materially from those described herein as intended, planned,
anticipated, believed, estimated or expected. The Company assumes
no obligation to update the information in this communication,
except as required by law. Additional information identifying risks
and uncertainties is contained in filings by the Company with the
various securities commissions which are available online at
www.sec.gov and www.sedarplus.ca.
Forward-looking statements are provided for the purpose of
providing information about the current expectations, beliefs and
plans of management. Such statements may not be appropriate for
other purposes and readers should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, that speak only as of the date hereof,
as there can be no assurance that the plans, intentions or
expectations upon which they are based will occur. Such
information, although considered reasonable by management at the
time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect and actual results
may differ materially from those anticipated. Forward-looking
statements contained in this news release are expressly qualified
by this cautionary statement.
View original content to download
multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/encore-energy-announces-filing-of-s-k-1300-technical-report-summaries-for-key-projects-in-texas-and-wyoming-302387208.html
SOURCE enCore Energy Corp.