AVGN Avigen (MM)

      On January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 07-01, Accounting for Collaborative Agreements, as codified in FASB ASC topic 808 , Collaborative Agreements (ASC 808). This standard defines collaborative agreements as contractual arrangements that involve a joint operating activity. These arrangements involve two (or more) parties who are both active participants in the activity and that are exposed to significant risks and rewards dependent on the commercial success of the activity. ASC 808 provides that a company should report the effects of adoption as a change in accounting principle through retrospective application to all periods and requires additional disclosures about a company’s collaborative arrangements. Our adoption of ASC 808 did not have a material impact on our condensed financial statements.

      In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, as codified in FASB ASC topic 825, Financial Instruments (ASC 825) . This standard amends SFAS No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments , as codified in ASC 825, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. ASC 825 also amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting , as codified in FASB ASC topic 270, Interim Reporting (ASC 270), to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. ASC 825 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The standard does not require disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. In periods after initial adoption, ASC 825 requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending after initial adoption. Our adoption of ASC 825 did not have a material impact on our condensed financial statements.

      In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments , as codified in FASB ASC topic 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities (ASC 320). This statement amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. ASC 320 does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. This statement modifies the requirements for recognizing other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities and revises the existing impairment model for such securities, by modifying the current intent and ability indicator in determining whether a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired. ASC 320 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. This standard does not require disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. In periods after initial adoption, this standard requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending after initial adoption. Our adoption of ASC 320 did not have a material impact on our condensed financial statements.

      In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, as codified by FASB ASC topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures , (ASC 820). This standard provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with ASC 820 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This standard also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. ASC 820 provides guidance on how to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities in the current economic environment and reemphasizes that the objective of a fair value measurement remains an exit price. If we were to conclude that there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity of the asset or liability in relation to normal market activities, quoted market values may not be representative of fair value and we may conclude that a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. ASC 820 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The standard does not require disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. In periods after initial adoption, ASC 820 requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending after initial adoption. Our adoption of ASC 820 did not have a material impact on our condensed financial statements.

      In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events , as codified by FASB ASC topic 855, Subsequent Events (ASC 855) . ASC 885 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Among other things, this standard requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. Our adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material effect on our condensed financial statements.

7

      In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) , as codified by FASB ASC topic 810, Consolidation (ASC 810). This standard amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities and the definition of a variable interest entity, and requires enhanced disclosures to provide more information about an enterprise's involvement in a variable interest entity. This statement also requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. ASC 810 is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010. We are currently reviewing the effect ASC 810 may have on our condensed financial statements.

      In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active, as codified by FASB ASC subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820-10). This standard clarifies the application of ASC 820 in a market that is not active and addresses application issues such as the use of internal assumptions when relevant observable data does not exist, the use of observable market information when the market is not active and the use of market quotes when assessing the relevance of observable and unobservable data. ASC 820-10 is effective for all periods presented in accordance with ASC 820. The guidance in ASC 820-10 was effective immediately and did not have a significant impact on our condensed financial position or results of operations upon adoption. See Note 4: “Fair Value of Financial Instruments" to the notes to our condensed financial statements in this Form 10-Q for information and related disclosures regarding our fair value measurements.

      In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP SFAS 157-2, as codified by ASC subtopic 820-10, which delays the effective date of ASC 820 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (items that are remeasured at least annually). The standard deferred the effective date of ASC 820 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities until our fiscal year beginning on January 1, 2009. On January 1, 2009, we adopted this standard, which did not have a material impact on our condensed financial statements.

2. Share-Based Compensation

      During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, share-based compensation expense has been recognized for all our share-based compensation plans as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Research and development	$	(49	)		$	(164	)		$	(253	)		$	(493	)
General and administrative		(100	)			(382	)			(611	)			(1,213	)
Share-based compensation expense before taxes		(149	)			(546	)			(864	)			(1,706	)
Related income tax benefits		-				-				-				-
Share-based compensation expense, net	$	(149	)		$	(546	)		$	(864	)		$	(1,706	)

8

---

      Since we have cumulative operating losses as of September 30, 2009 for which a valuation allowance has been established, we recorded no income tax benefits for share-based compensation arrangements during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

      As of September 30, 2009, we had stock options outstanding to employees, non-employee directors, and consultants under three share-based compensation plans; however, only the 2006 Incentive Stock Option Plan (“2006 Plan”) was available for future grants. The 1996 Equity Incentive Plan (“1996 Plan”) and the 1996 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (“Directors’ Plan”) were both approved by our stockholders, had a ten-year duration and were terminated on March 29, 2006. The 2006 Plan was approved by our stockholders in May 2006 and is an amendment and restatement of the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (“2000 Plan”) which was adopted by Avigen’s Board of Directors in June 2000. The adoption of the 2006 Plan did not increase the number of shares available for grant under the 2000 Plan.

      In general, the outstanding options under these plans were granted at a price equal to the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant with a term of 10 years. Grants under the 2006 Plan and 1996 Plan generally become exercisable on a quarterly basis over a vesting period of either three or four years. Grants under the Directors’ Plan become exercisable in three annual installments. As of September 30, 2009, we had an aggregate of 3,431,319 shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under these plans subject to outstanding awards and 2,509,701 shares available for future grants of share-based awards under the 2006 Plan.

      The following table summarizes option activity with regard to all stock options:

		Outstanding Options
		Number of Shares		Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2008			4,142,324			$	6.48
Granted			-				-
Canceled			(351,873	)			5.41
Exercised			-				-
Outstanding at March 31, 2009			3,790,451			$	6.58
Granted			-				-
Canceled			(199,232	)			5.70
Exercised			(62,000	)			0.61
Outstanding at June 30, 2009			3,529,219			$	6.74
Granted			-				-
Canceled			(92,650	)			4.68
Exercised			(5,250	)			0.61
Outstanding at September 30, 2009			3,431,319			$	6.80

      There were no employee stock options granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. The fair value of our employee stock options granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, were estimated under the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the weighted average assumptions shown in the table below. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of our common stock. The expected term of options granted is based primarily on analyses of historical employee termination and option exercise behavior; separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The risk-free interest rates are based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a period consistent with the expected term of the option in effect at the time of the grant. Share-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period. The estimated forfeiture rates are based on analyses of historical data, taking into account patterns of involuntary termination and other factors.

9

---

		Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2009		2008		2009		2008
Expected volatility		n/a		0.5605			n/a		0.5348
Risk free interest rate		n/a		3.11	%		n/a		2.92	%
Expected life of options in years		n/a		3.5			n/a		4.9
Expected dividend yield		n/a		0	%		n/a		0	%

      Our employee stock options are granted at a price equal to the fair market value of our stock on the date of the grant. The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $1.55 per share. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $42,000 and $91,000, respectively. At September 30, 2009, the total intrinsic value of options outstanding was $ 14,000 , with no intrinsic value from options exercisable. The weighted average remaining contractual life of options exercisable at September 30, 2009 was 3.0 years.

      As of September 30, 2009, there was approximately $ 370,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years.

      As of September 30, 2009, we had 3.3 million outstanding stock options that had vested or are expected to vest with a weighted average exercise price of $6.87 , a weighted average remaining contractual term of 3.3 years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $ 10,000 .

      For equity awards to non-employees, including lenders, lessors, and consultants, we also apply the Black-Scholes method to determine the fair value of such investments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), as codified by FASB ASC topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation (ASC 718), and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods, or Services , as codified by FASB ASC topic 505 , Equity (ASC 505) . The options and warrants granted to non-employees are re-measured as they vest and the resulting value is recognized as an expense against our net loss over the period during which the services are received or the term of the related financing.

3. Cash and Cash Equivalents, Available-For-Sale Securities, and Restricted Investments

      Cash and Cash Equivalents

      We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. These amounts are recorded at cost, which approximates fair market value. As of September 30, 2009, our investment portfolio was completely invested in money market funds and classified as cash equivalents.

      Available- for-Sale Securities

      Historically, we invested our excess cash balances in marketable securities, primarily corporate debt securities, federal agency obligations, asset-backed securities, U.S. treasuries, and municipal bonds, with the primary investment objectives of preservation of principal, a high degree of liquidity, and maximum total return. We did not invest in auction rate securities. All money market funds and marketable securities are held in our name under the custodianship of Wells Capital Management. In periods in which we owned marketable securities, we classified our investments in marketable securities as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are reported at market value and unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, if any, are excluded from earnings and are reported in other comprehensive income (loss) and as a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized. A decline in the market value of a security below its cost that is deemed to be other than temporary is charged to earnings, and would result in the establishment of a new cost basis for the security. Realized gains and losses, if any, are included in earnings and are reported in other income.

10

---

      Our available-for-sale securities consisted principally of obligations with a minimum short-term rating of A1/P1 and a minimum long-term rating of A- and with effective maturities of less than three years. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest on securities classified as available-for-sale is included in interest income.

      Restricted Cash and Investments

      At September 30, 2009, $2.0 million of cash equivalents were classified as restricted cash and investments in non-current assets. At December 31, 2008, $7.0 and $2.0 million of available-for-sale securities were classified as restricted cash and investments in current assets and restricted cash and investments in non-current assets, respectively. The total of these amounts that are classified as current and non-current restricted cash and investments at the end of each period represents the combined aggregate portion of our investment portfolio that was pledged in connection with certain liabilities at the end of each period. During the first quarter of 2009, we repaid our bank borrowings of $7.0 million that were outstanding at December 31, 2008, and correspondingly reduced our reported amount of restricted cash and investments in current assets that was associated with the collateral on the debt.

      At September 30, 2009, $ 2.9 million of cash was held in an irrevocable grantor trust, or rabbi trust, which the company maintains to hold amounts intended to fund benefit obligations under the Avigen, Inc. Management Transition Plan (Plan). These funds represent reserves for severance pay and benefits to eligible terminating employees as defined by the Plan. The cash in the rabbi trust is consolidated with that of the company and is reported at fair value and classified as restricted cash and investments in current assets. The related accrued severance obligation is reported at fair value and included in accrued compensation and related expenses. See also Note 6 – Severance Expense.

The following is a summary of cash, restricted investments, and available-for-sale securities as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):

		Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Cash and money market funds		$	39,903		$	-		$	-		$	39,903
Total		$	39,903		$	-		$	-		$	39,903
Amounts reported as:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	34,962		$	-		$	-		$	34,962
Restricted cash and investments			4,941			-			-			4,941
Total		$	39,903		$	-		$	-		$	39,903

      The weighted average maturity of our investment portfolio at September 30, 2009 was 1 day, with all $39.9 million carrying an effective maturity of less than twelve months.

      The following is a summary of cash, restricted cash and investments, and available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):

		Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Cash and money market funds		$	9,304		$	-		$	-			$	9,304
Corporate debt securities			8,541			11			(58	)			8,494
Federal agency obligations			25,781			488			-				26,269
Asset-backed and other securities			12,856			-			(84	)			12,772
Total		$	56,482		$	499		$	(142	)		$	56,839
Amounts reported as:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	9,304		$	-		$	-			$	9,304
Restricted cash and investments			9,036			-			-				9,036
Available-for-sale securities			38,142			499			(142	)			38,499
Total		$	56,482		$	499		$	(142	)		$	56,839

11

---

      The weighted average maturity of our investment portfolio at December 31, 2008 was 233 days, with $41.5 million carrying an effective maturity of less than twelve months, and $15.3 million carrying an effective maturity between one and two years.

      Net realized gains on sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities were approximately $ 327,000 and $ 60,000 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and recorded in our condensed statements of operations as interest income.

      At September 30, 2009, we did not own any available-for-sale securities and none of our money market securities were in an unrealized loss position. At December 31, 2008, we had the following available-for-sale securities that were in an unrealized loss position but were not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired (in thousands):

		Less Than 12 Months		12 Months or Greater
December 31, 2008		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
Corporate debt securities		$	(14	)		$	2,239		$	(44	)		$	3,482
Asset-backed and other securities			(52	)			11,804			(32	)			968
Total		$	(66	)		$	14,043		$	(76	)		$	4,450

      The gross unrealized losses reported above for December 31, 2008 were caused by general fluctuations in market interest rates from the respective purchase date of these securities through December 31, 2008. No significant facts or circumstances have occurred to indicate that these unrealized losses are related to any deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuers of the marketable securities we own. Based on our review of these securities, including our assessment of the duration and severity of the related unrealized losses, we have not recorded any other-than-temporary impairments on these investments.

4. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

      Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements , and effective October 10, 2008, we adopted FSP FAS 157-3, Determining Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active , as codified by FASB ASC topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, (ASC 820), except as it applies to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities subject to FSP FAS 157-2 as codified by ASC 820. On January 1, 2009, we adopted ASC 820 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. ASC 820 applies to all fair value measurements not otherwise specified in an existing standard, clarifies how to measure fair value, and expands fair value disclosures. This standard does not significantly change our previous practice with regard to asset valuation. The ASC 820 framework clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or the amount paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

      ASC 820 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into levels of objectivity associated with the inputs used as follows:

• Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

• Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
   
• Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on management’s own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value.

12

---

      The following methods and assumptions were used to determine the fair value of each class of assets recorded at fair value in the balance sheets:

      Cash equivalents: Cash equivalents consist of highly rated money market funds with maturities of three months or less, and are purchased daily at par value with specified yield rates. Due to the high ratings and short-term nature of these funds, the Company considers all cash equivalents as Level 1 inputs.

      Available-for-sale securities at fair value: Fair values are based on quoted market prices, where available. These fair values are obtained primarily from third party pricing services, which generally use Level 1 or Level 2 inputs for the determination of fair value in accordance with ASC 820. Third party pricing services normally derive the security prices through recently reported trades for identical or similar securities making adjustments through the reporting date based upon available market observable information. For securities not actively traded, the third party pricing services may use quoted market prices of comparable instruments or discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating inputs that are currently observable in the markets for similar securities. Inputs that are often used in valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data. We utilize multiple third-party pricing services to obtain fair value; however, we generally obtain one price for each individual security. We perform a review of the prices received from third parties to determine whether the prices are reasonable estimates of fair value. We also review the fair value hierarchy classifications. Changes in the observability of valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of levels for certain securities within the fair value hierarchy.

      A financial asset’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of credit risk associated with investing in those securities. The following table provides the fair value measurements of our financial assets according to the fair value levels defined by ASC 820 as of September 30 , 2009 (in thousands):

					Fair Value Measurements Using
		Fair Value as of September 30, 2009		Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets		Level 2 Significant other observable inputs		Level 3 Significant unobservable inputs
Cash and money market
funds		$	39,903		$	39,903		$	--		$	--

      Investment securities are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate, market and credit. Due to the level of risk associated with certain investment securities and the level of uncertainty related to changes in the value of investment securities, it is possible that changes in these risk factors in the near term could have an adverse material impact on our results of operations or stockholders’ equity.

      Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

      SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities and FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-4, Recognition and Presentation of Other-than-Temporary Impairments , as codified in ASC topic 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities (ASC 320), and SAB Topic 5M, Accounting for Non-current Marketable Equity Securities , as codified by ASC 320 provide guidance on determining when an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. Our investments are reviewed quarterly for indicators of other-than-temporary impairment. ASC 320 is effective for all periods ending after June 15, 2009 and provides additional guidance designed to create a greater clarity and consistency in accounting for and presenting impairment losses on securities. As of September 30, 2009, we did not have any available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position.

13

---

5. Settlement of Asset Retirement Obligation

      On March 11, 2008, we entered into an agreement with ARE-1201 Harbor Bay, LLC, to amend our building lease in connection with approximately 45,000 square feet of laboratory and office space at 1201 Harbor Bay Parkway, Alameda, CA. Prior to this amendment, under the terms of the building lease, which subsequently expired on May 31, 2008, we could have been required, at the landlord’s sole discretion, to remove, reconfigure or otherwise alter some of the improvements we had made to the facility. We had previously determined the fair value of this asset retirement obligation was approximately $484,000 at December 31, 2007, based on an assessment of a range of possible settlement dates and amounts.

      Under the terms of the amendment, we were released from our obligation to remove any alterations in exchange for, among other things, a payment to the landlord of $210,000. As a result of this settlement, we reduced our liability for the asset retirement obligation in March 2008 by $274,000 with a corresponding credit to impairment loss related to long-lived assets and reduced the level of restricted assets in response to the cancellation of the corresponding letter of credit that served as a deposit for the asset retirement obligation prior to the date of the amendment.

6. Severance Expense

      In March 2009, we announced that our Board of Directors had discontinued strategic merger discussions to develop a plan for liquidation. As a result, our Board of Directors determined that the company no longer needed to retain the services of a majority of its employees that were supporting strategic discussions and we reduced our headcount accordingly, including three officers of the company.

      In connection with this action, we incurred obligations to pay severance benefits to qualified employees under the Avigen, Inc. Management Transition Plan (Plan), including salary continuation payments and health benefits continuation as defined in the Plan. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized a severance expense of approximately $2.1 million. In addition, under the terms of the Plan, outstanding unvested stock options held by terminated employees were subject to accelerated vesting conditions and an increase in the post termination exercise period and we recognized a non-cash, share-based compensation charge of approximately $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

      No expenses related to this plan were recorded for the six months ended September 30, 2009. However, Avigen’s four remaining employees are qualified to receive severance benefits under the Plan. Regardless of whether the proposed merger with MediciNova is consummated, upon termination, Avigen would anticipate incurring additional severance expense of approximately $872,000.

14

---

7. Sublease Income

      We lease approximately 67,000 square feet of laboratory, manufacturing, and office facilities in Alameda, California under a non-cancellable operating lease agreement that expires November 30, 2010 and have entered into sublease agreements for portions of these facilities. In February 2009, we entered into a sublease agreement commencing March 1, 2009 through November 30, 2010 for approximately 16,500 square feet of laboratory and office facilities that will expire November 2010. This sublease agreement was amended to cover approximately 19,155 square feet effective September 1, 2009.

      As of September 30, 2009, the cumulative total of our leased facilities that are subleased to corporate tenants not affiliated with Avigen is approximately 33,555 square feet. The sublease agreements run concurrent with the respective duration of our underlying lease term.

      At September 30, 2009, our future minimum commitments under non-cancelable facilities operating leases, net of sublease income, are a follows (in thousands):

		Minimum Lease Commitments		Sublease Income		Net Lease Commitments
Year ending December 31:
2009		$	410		$	(239	)		$	171
2010			1,543			(898	)			645
2011			-			-				-
2012			-			-				-
2013 and thereafter			-			-				-
Total		$	1,953		$	(1,137	)		$	816

8. Long Term Loan Payable

      In June 2000, we entered into a financing arrangement with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Bank”) to support construction-related activities. Under this arrangement, we had the right to borrow up to $10.0 million through June 1, 2003. This revolving line of credit was amended several times to extend the expiration date and is currently scheduled to expire on November 30, 2009. Under the terms of the credit facility, as renewed, we could from time to time during the term of the Loan Commitment partially or wholly repay any outstanding borrowings, provided that amounts repaid could not be re-borrowed, and that the outstanding principal balance of the loan commitment would be due and payable in full on November 30, 2009. At December 31, 2008, we had outstanding borrowings of $7.0 million that was classified as a current liability. As of September 30, 2009, we had repaid our total outstanding borrowings and are no longer able to borrow against the loan commitment.

      In addition, the Bank separately maintains our currently outstanding standby letter of credit in the amount of $2.0 million pursuant to the terms required under our building operating lease that expires in November 2010 and is issued in favor of the property owner.

15

---

9. Comprehensive Loss

      Components of other comprehensive loss, including unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, were included as part of total comprehensive loss (in thousands).

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		September 30,		September 30,
		2009		2008		2009		2008
Net loss		$	(1,448	)		$	(9,403	)		$	(9,969	)		$	(24,155	)
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities			(275	)			(508	)			(357	)			(463	)
Comprehensive loss		$	(1,723	)		$	(9,911	)		$	(10,326	)		$	(24,618	)

10. Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Common Share

      Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of basic net loss per share for all periods presented is derived from the information on the face of the statement of operations, and there are no reconciling items in either the numerator or denominator.

      Diluted net loss per common share is computed as though all potential common shares that are dilutive were outstanding during the year, using the treasury stock method for the purposes of calculating the weighted-average number of dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. Potential dilutive common shares consist of shares issuable upon exercise of stock options and warrants. Securities that potentially could have diluted basic earnings per common share, but were excluded from the diluted net loss per common share computation because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive, were as follows:

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,		September 30,
		2009		2008		2009		2008
Potential dilutive stock options outstanding		6,154		52,243		11,437		14,638
Outstanding securities excluded from the potential
dilutive common shares calculation (1)		3,474,941		3,533,492		3,655,733		4,003,155

____________________
 

(1)

For purposes of computing the potential dilutive common shares, we have excluded outstanding stock options and warrants to purchase common stock the exercise prices of which exceed the average of the closing sale prices of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market for the period.

11. Stockholders’ Equity

      During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, we received approximately $ 41,000 in cash proceeds related to the exercise of stock options for 67,250 shares of common stock.

      As of September 30, 2009, we had one warrant outstanding for 15,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price equal to $6.50. The warrant was issued in March 2004 as partial consideration for the acquisition of some intellectual property rights used in our research and development activities and has a ten-year term.

12. Legal Proceedings

      On August 24, 2009, The Pennsylvania Avenue Funds, an Avigen stockholder, filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court alleging that Avigen’s directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the proposed transaction with MediciNova. The Pennsylvania Avenue Funds seeks to represent a stockholder class and to enjoin the consummation of the Merger. Plaintiff seeks a judgment determining that the action is a proper class action and that plaintiff is a proper class representative, and awarding plaintiff and the purported class damages, attorney’s fees, costs and interest.

16

---

13. Merger

On August 20, 2009, Avigen entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with MediciNova, Inc. (“ MediciNova ”) and Absolute Merger, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MediciNova (“ Merger Sub ”), pursuant to which, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, Merger Sub will merge with and into Avigen (the “ Merger ”), with Avigen continuing as the surviving corporation and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of MediciNova.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of Avigen common stock (and the associated preferred share purchase right), par value $0.001 per share, will be converted into an amount currently estimated at approximately $1.24 per share in either cash or secured convertible notes issued by MediciNova, at the election of each individual Avigen stockholder. Stockholders that do not make a valid election will receive 50% of the consideration in cash and 50% of the consideration in secured convertible notes issued by MediciNova. Approximately $1.19 of such consideration will be paid at the effective time of the Merger, and approximately $0.05 will be paid on June 30, 2010 pursuant to the terms of an escrow agreement to be entered into at the effective time of the Merger. Both payments are subject to certain adjustments as specified in the Merger Agreement. The secured convertible notes will be convertible on the final business day of each month into shares of MediciNova common stock at an initial conversion price of $6.80 per share (based on the volume-weighted average price of MediciNova’s common stock as quoted on The Nasdaq Stock Market and the Osaka Securities Exchange over the 20-day trading period ending on the business day prior to August 20, 2009). In addition, Avigen’s stockholders will be entitled to one Contingent Payment Right (as defined in the Merger Agreement) for each share of Avigen common stock held immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger, which provide for additional potential cash payments based on achievement of a certain milestone under Avigen’s assignment agreement with Genzyme Corporation or other specified events. Outstanding options to purchase Avigen common stock will be cancelled at the effective time of the Merger.

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and pre-closing covenants, and the completion of the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including adoption of the Merger Agreement by Avigen’s stockholders, adoption of the Merger Agreement and approval of the issuance of the convertible notes by MediciNova’s stockholders, execution of certain ancillary agreements and the absence of a material adverse effect on Avigen. In the event that Avigen’s board of directors changes its recommendation regarding the Merger following receipt of a superior offer, as defined in the Merger Agreement, and the Merger is not consummated, Avigen will be required to reimburse MediciNova for 50% of its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, up to a maximum $500,000, upon a termination of the Merger Agreement prior to the effective time of the Merger. The parties intend to complete the Merger as soon as practicable and currently anticipate that the closing will occur in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

      The following discussion may be understood more fully by reference to the financial statements, notes to the financial statements, and management’s discussion and analysis of financial conditions and results of operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2009.

      This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, which include, but are not limited to, statements of our expectations regarding our future financial results, and statements about other future events and results. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by such terms as “may,” “might,” “can,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “predict,” “potential,” “if” and similar expressions which imply that the statements relate to future events. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We discuss the risks we believe are most important in greater detail under the heading “Risk Relating to our Business” below. Also, these forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements contained in this report to reflect any future events or developments.

17

---

Overview

      Avigen is a biopharmaceutical company that has focused on identifying and developing differentiated products to treat patients with serious disorders. Our strategy was to conceive or acquire and develop opportunities that represent a positive return to Avigen’s stockholders. Our current potential product is AV411, a glial attenuator, for neuropathic pain and opioid withdrawal and methamphetamine addiction.

      Prior to October 2008, we had been developing a product candidate, AV650, for the treatment of spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis. In that month, we announced that top-line data from a Phase 2b clinical trial of AV650 did not achieve statistical significance on its primary endpoint or most secondary endpoints. There were no safety issues. We believe that the trial was adequately powered and all statistical parameters were in line with expectations. Based on these results, we terminated the AV650 program and initiated a restructuring to immediately reduce our expenses and preserve our remaining financial resources in order to evaluate other strategic opportunities.

      The restructuring included a significant staff reduction and closure of portions of our leased facilities in November 2008.

      In December 2008, we completed a sale of our early-stage AV513 program for $7.2 million to Baxter Healthcare Corporation. We also expanded our efforts to monetize our AV411 program for neuropathic pain and addiction. While the ongoing NIDA-funded Phase 1b/2a trials for AV411 in opioid withdrawal and methamphetamine relapse will continue in 2009, we do not intend to initiate Phase 2 clinical trials for neuropathic pain or other indications.

      In January 2009, we initiated an orderly and competitive process to review merger and acquisition opportunities. We believed that the strength of our financial position would allow us to enter into a favorable merger and acquisition transaction and lead to increased value for our stockholders. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, our Board of Directors was engaged in a proxy fight initiated by our largest stockholder which resulted in a Special Meeting of Stockholders. On March 27, 2009, Avigen’s stockholders rejected a proposal to remove the current members of the Board of Directors; however, Avigen’s Board believed it was no longer prudent to continue its strategic review process and abandoned strategic merger discussions and announced its intention to develop a plan of dissolution that would maximize the liquidation value of the company. In connection with this action, our Board of Directors determined that the company no longer needed to retain the services of a majority of our employees that were supporting strategic discussions and we reduced our headcount accordingly, including three officers of the company. As a result, we incurred obligations to pay severance benefits to qualified employees under the Avigen, Inc. Management Transition Plan, including salary continuation payments and health benefits continuation. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized a severance expense of approximately $2.1 million. In addition, under the terms of the Management Transition Plan, outstanding unvested stock options held by terminated employees were subject to accelerated vesting conditions and an increase in the post termination exercise period and we recognized a non-cash, share-based compensation charge of approximately $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. No expenses related to this plan were recorded during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 or September 30, 2009.

      On August 20, 2009, we entered into a definitive agreement with MediciNova, Inc. pursuant to which, if approved by Avigen’s stockholders, MediciNova’s wholly-owned subsidiary will merge with and into Avigen. The completion of the transaction will permit the combination of the companies’ broad neurological clinical development programs based on ibudilast (Avigen’s AV411 and MediciNova’s MN-166).

      We are a development stage company and have primarily supported the financial needs of our research and development activities since our inception through public offerings and private placements of our equity securities. We have not received any revenue from the commercial sale of our products in development, and we do not anticipate generating revenue from the commercialization of AV411 in the foreseeable future. Currently we have suspended development activities for AV411 for neuropathic pain but have continued our ongoing clinical development for AV411 for opioid addition and withdrawal which is being primarily funded by third-parties. In September, a preliminary Form S-4 Registration Statement and joint proxy statement was filed by Avigen and MediciNova, which was subsequently amended in October 2009. The two companies are working expeditiously to present this transaction for stockholder approval before the end of 2009.

18

---

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

      Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments related to revenue recognition, valuation of investments in financial instruments, impairment of property and equipment, asset retirement obligations, recognition of research and development expenses and stock-based compensation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

      We believe the accounting policies as disclosed in our Form 10-K are critical to the process of making significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of our financial statements. These policies have not changed from those presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2009.

Results of Operations

      Research and development expenses

      Historically, we maintained a small staff level and subleased portions of our leased operating facilities to reduce our overhead costs. In November 2008, we completed a significant restructuring plan to further reduce infrastructure expenses including a reduction of our staff level by approximately 70 percent, and initiated a wind down of the remaining research and development activities associated with our potential products. This was intended to preserve our financial resources, minimize our exposure to fixed costs for staff and facilities and increase our control over the strategic timing and use of all of our resources. As a result of the staff reduction in March 2009, we only have one employee associated with overseeing research and development activities of AV411 and related compounds.

      Prior to the restructuring in November 2008, our research and development expenses can be divided into two primary functions: (1) costs to support research and preclinical development, and (2) costs to support preparation for and implementation of human clinical trials. Research and preclinical development costs include activities associated with general research and exploration, animal studies, non-clinical studies to support the design of human clinical trials, and in-house and independent third-party validation testing of potential acquisition or in-license drug candidates. Clinical development costs include activities associated with preparing for regulatory approvals, maintaining regulated and controlled processes, purchasing manufactured drug substances for use in human clinical trials, and supporting subject enrollment and subject administration within clinical trials.

      The costs associated with these two primary functions of our research and development activities approximate the following (in thousands, except percentages):

							Percentage									Percentage
	Three Months Ended						decrease			Nine Months Ended						decrease
	September 30,		over prior			September 30,		over prior
	2009		2008		year		2009		2008		year
Research and preclinical development	$	201		$	2,309		(91	%)		$	1,604		$	8,008		(80	%)
Clinical development		25			3,369		(99	%)			1,962			9,833		(80	%)
Total research and development expenses	$	226		$	5,678		(96	%)		$	3,566		$	17,841		(80	%)

19

---

      Because a significant percentage of our research and development resources contributed to multiple development programs, the majority of our costs were not directly attributed to individual development programs. We based decisions regarding our project management and resource allocation primarily on interpretations of scientific data, rather than cost allocations. Our estimates of costs between research and preclinical development and clinical development activities were primarily based on staffing roles within our research and development departments. As such, costs allocated to specific projects may not necessarily reflect the actual costs of those efforts and, therefore, we do not generally evaluate actual costs-incurred information on a project-by-project basis. In addition, we are unable to estimate the future costs to complete any specific projects.

      Research and preclinical development

							Percentage									Percentage
	Three Months Ended						decrease			Nine Months Ended						decrease
	September 30,		over prior			September 30,		over prior
	2009		2008		year		2009		2008		year
(In thousands, except percentages)
Personnel-related	$	86		$	493		(83	%)		$	414		$	1,619		(74	%)
Non-recurring severance		-			-		-				69			-		n/a
Share-based compensation		46			132		(65	%)			177			417		(58	%)
External research and
development		58			1,072		(95	%)			582			3,416		(83	%)
Depreciation and amortization		-			141		(100	%)			-			762		(100	%)
Other expenses including facilities
overhead		11			471		(98	%)			362			1,794		(80	%)
Total research and preclinical
development expenses	$	201		$	2,309		(91	%)		$	1,604		$	8,008		(80	%)

      The decrease in our total research and preclinical development expenses for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008, of $2.1 million, was primarily due to changes in costs for the following:

• lower expenditures for external research and development services from third-party service providers of $1.0 million, primarily reflecting the wind down of external animal studies and other research and development activities for our drug development programs,
   
• lower other expenses including facilities overhead allocations of $460,000, reflecting the wind down of the use of internal research and development facilities with the offset of costs from expanded sublease recoveries or a reallocation of expenses to general and administrative expenses,
   
• lower personnel-related expenses of $407,000, due to lower staff levels, as a result of the significant staff reduction in November 2008 and subsequent reductions in March 2009, and
   
• lower depreciation and amortization expenses of $141,0000, reflecting the end of the depreciable lives for equipment and leasehold improvements associated with our leased facility that expired in May 2008, and the impairment charges for leasehold improvements and equipment that we recognized in December 2008.

20

---

      The decrease in our total research and preclinical development expenses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008, of $6.4 million, was primarily due to changes in costs for the following:

• lower expenditures for external research and development services from third-party service providers of $2.8 million, primarily reflecting the wind down of external animal studies and other research and development activities for our drug development programs,
   
• lower other expenses including facilities overhead allocations of $1.4 million, reflecting the wind down of the use of internal research and development facilities with the offset of costs from expanded sublease recoveries or a reallocation of expenses to general and administrative expenses,
   
• lower personnel-related expenses of $1.2 million, due to lower staff levels, as a result of the significant staff reduction in November 2008 and subsequent reductions in March 2009, and
   
• lower depreciation and amortization expenses of $762,000, reflecting the end of the depreciable lives for equipment and leasehold improvements associated with our leased facility that expired in May 2008, and the impairment charges for leasehold improvements and equipment that we recognized in December 2008.

      Clinical development

																Percentage
							Percentage									increase
	Three Months Ended						decrease			Nine Months Ended						(decrease)
	September 30,		over prior			September 30,		over prior
	2009		2008		Year		2009		2008		Year
(In thousands, except percentages)
Personnel-related	$	-		$	393		(100	%)		$	217		$	1,329		(84	%)
Non-recurring severance		-			--		-				443			-		n/a
Share-based compensation		4			32		(88	%)			76			77		1	%
External clinical development		21			2,816		(99	%)			1,185			8,082		(85	%)
Other expenses including facilities
overhead		-			128		(100	%)			41			345		(88	%)
Total clinical development
expenses	$	25		$	3,369		(99	%)		$	1,962		$	9,833		(80	%)

      The decrease in our total clinical development expenses for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008, of $3.3 million, was primarily due to changes in costs for the following:

• lower expenditures for external clinical development services from third-party suppliers of $2.8 million, primarily reflecting the termination and wind down of most of our clinical trials and other clinical drug development activities, and
   
• lower personnel-related expenses of $393,000, due to lower staff levels, as a result of the significant staff reduction in November 2008 and subsequent reductions in March 2009.

      The decrease in our total clinical development expenses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008, of $7.9 million, was primarily due to changes in costs for the following:

• lower expenditures for external clinical development services from third-party suppliers of $6.9 million, primarily reflecting the termination and wind down of most of our clinical trials and other clinical drug development activities, and

21

---

• lower personnel-related expenses of $1.1 million, due to lower staff levels, as a result of the significant staff reduction in November 2008 and subsequent reductions in March 2009,

partially offset by,

• non-recurring severance expenses of $443,000 recorded in connection with staff reductions in March 2009.

      We expect our total research and development spending for the fourth-quarter of 2009 not to exceed the expense levels from the three months ended September 30, 2009 as we seek stockholder approval of the definitive agreement to merge Avigen with a wholly-owned subsidiary of MediciNova.

      General and administrative expenses

							Percentage									Percentage
							increase									increase
	Three Months Ended						(decrease)			Nine Months Ended						(decrease)
	September 30,		over prior			September 30,		over prior
	2009		2008		Year		2009		2008		Year
(In thousands, except percentages)
Personnel-related	$	85		$	570		(85	%)		$	702		$	2,134		(67	%)
Non-recurring severance		-			-		-				1,631			-		n/a
Share-based compensation		100			382		(74	%)			611			1,213		(50	%)
Legal and professional fees		871			263		231	%			2,970			946		214	%
Facilities, depreciation and
other allocated expenses		710			633		12	%			2,266			2,105		8	%
Total general and
administrative expenses	$	1,766		$	1,848		(4	%)		$	8,180		$	6,398		28	%

      The decrease in our total general and administrative expenses for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008, of $82,000, was primarily due to changes in costs for the following:

• lower personnel-related expenses of $485,000, due to lower staff levels, as a result of significant staff reductions in November 2008 and March 2009, and
   
• lower non-cash expenses of $282,000 for recognition of share-based compensation in compliance with ASC 718,

partially offset by,

• higher legal and professional fees of $608,000, primarily due to higher legal and advisory expenses associated with our negotiations and entry into a definitive merger agreement with MediciNova, preparations of related SEC proxy filings, and defense against a class action lawsuit brought in connection with the proposed merger transaction.

      The increase in our total general and administrative expenses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008, of $1.8 million, was primarily due to changes in costs for the following:

• higher legal and professional fees of $2.0 million, primarily due to higher legal and advisory expenses associated with our response to a proxy fight and unsolicited tender offer and our review of strategic merger and acquisition opportunities in the first quarter of 2009 and negotiations and entry into a definitive merger agreement with MediciNova, and defense against a class action lawsuit brought in connection with the proposed merger transaction in the third quarter of 2009, and

22

---

• non-recurring severance expenses of $1.6 million recorded in connection with staff reductions in March 2009,

partially offset by,

• lower personnel-related expenses of $1.4 million, due to lower staff levels, as a result of significant staff reductions in November 2008 and March 2009, and
   
• lower non-cash expenses of $602,000 for recognition of share-based compensation in compliance with ASC 718.

      Total general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 exceeded management's original expectations due to the significant legal and other costs incurred in connection with responding to the proxy fight and hostile tender offer during the first quarter of 2009 and completing negotiations and defending against the class action lawsuit in connection with the definitive merger agreement entered into with MediciNova during the third quarter of 2009. We expect to incur lower legal and professional fees for the remainder of the fiscal year while we seek stockholder approval of the definitive agreement to merge Avigen with a wholly-owned subsidiary of MediciNova.

      Impairment loss related to long-lived assets

							Percentage									Percentage
	Three Months Ended						decrease		Nine Months Ended							decrease
	September 30,		over prior		September 30,		over prior
	2009		2008		year		2009		2008		year
(In thousands, except percentages)
Impairment loss related to
long-lived assets	$	0		$	0		n/a		$	0		$	(274	)		n/a

      The credit recorded to impairment loss related to long-lived assets for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008, reflects the gain of $274,000 recorded in connection with the settlement of our asset retirement obligation related to our building lease for an amount below the carrying value of the accrued liability.

      In-license fees

							Percentage								Percentage
	Three Months Ended						decrease		Nine Months Ended						decrease
	September 30,		over prior		September 30,		over prior
	2009		2008		year		2009		2008		year
(In thousands, except percentages)
In-license fees	$	0		$	2,500		n/a		$	0		$	2,500		n/a

      In-license fees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 represent amounts paid to Sanochemia Pharmazeutika AG (Sanochemia) upon the timely achievement of a development-based milestone for the development of a proprietary, purer form of AV650. There were no in-license fees incurred in 2009.

      During the fourth quarter of 2008, we terminated our agreement with Sanochemia under which such in-license fees were incurred. As a result, we do not expect to incur any future in-license fees associated with this agreement.

23

---

      Interest income

							Percentage									Percentage
	Three Months Ended						decrease			Nine Months Ended						decrease
	September 30,		over prior			September 30,		over prior
	2009		2008		year		2009		2008		year
(In thousands, except percentages)
Interest income	$	316		$	594		(47	%)		$	1,115		$	2,289		(51	%)

      Almost all of our interest income is generated from our investments in high-grade marketable securities of government and corporate debt. The decrease in interest for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to the same periods in 2008, were primarily due to the decrease in our outstanding interest-bearing cash and securities balances, due to the use of such resources to fund our on-going operations and repay $7.0 million of bank borrowings in March 2009, as well as a general decline in market interest rates.

      As of September 30, 2009, in order to increase the liquidity of our investment portfolio, we sold all of our outstanding available-for-sale marketable securities and invested all of our excess funds in money market funds or cash accounts. As a result, we expect our interest income for the fourth quarter of 2009 to be significantly below the amount earned for the three months ended September 30, 2009.

      Sublease income

							Percentage									Percentage
	Three Months Ended						decrease			Nine Months Ended						decrease
	September 30,		over prior			September 30,		over prior
	2009		2008		year		2009		2008		year
(In thousands, except percentages)
Sublease income	$	232		$	97		139	%		$	594		$	270		120	%

      In February 2009, we entered into an additional sublease agreement, subsequently amended and expanded in September 2009, that increased the total amount of our leased facilities under sublease agreements to 33,555 square feet, or approximately 50%. Remaining contractual sublease income of $1.1 million is expected to be recognized ratably over the remaining terms of the sublease agreements, which expire in November 2010.

24

---

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

      See Note 1, “Unaudited Interim Financial Statements - Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” in the Notes to Condensed Financial Statements for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and their effect, if any, on us, which discussion is incorporated by reference here.

Deferred Income Tax Assets

      In accordance with FAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes , as codified by FASB ASC topic 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740), we have calculated a deferred tax asset based on the potential future tax benefit we may be able to realize in future periods as a result of the significant tax losses experienced since our inception. The value of such deferred tax asset must be calculated using the tax rates expected to apply to the taxable income in the years in which such income occurs. Since we have no history of earnings, and cannot reliably predict when we might generate taxable income, if at all, we have recorded a valuation allowance for the full amount of our deferred tax assets. Federal and state laws limit the use of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards in certain situations where changes occur in the stock ownership of a company. In 2008 and 2007, we conducted an Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 382 study and have reported our deferred tax assets related to net operating loss and research credit carryforwards after recognizing change of control limitations in 2008 and 2006. Utilization of our net operating loss and research and development credit carryforwards may still be subject to substantial annual limitations due to ownership change limitations after December 31, 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Since our inception in 1992, cash expenditures have significantly exceeded our revenue. We have funded our operations primarily through public offerings and private placements of our equity securities. Between May 1996, the date of our initial public offering, and September 30, 2009, we raised $235.7 million from private placements and public offerings of our common stock and warrants to purchase our common stock.

      In December 2008, we sold our rights to an early-stage blood coagulation compound, AV513, to Baxter Healthcare Corporation for approximately $7.2 million.

      We have attempted to contain costs and reduce cash flow by renting facilities, subleasing facilities no longer critical to our future operations, contracting with third parties to conduct research and development and using consultants, where appropriate. In November 2008, we completed a significant restructuring and staff reduction intended to reduce our future expenses and preserve our financial resources. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we incurred significant legal and advisory fees in connection with our response to a proxy fight and unsolicited tender offer and our review of strategic merger and acquisition opportunities prior to March 31, 2009 and subsequent negotiations of and entry into a definitive merger agreement with MediciNova, as well as the defense of the associated class action lawsuit. We expect to incur additional expenses in connection with presenting the proposed MediciNova merger to stockholders for approval, but do not intend to initiate Phase 2 clinical trials for AV411 for neuropathic pain or other indications. As a result, we expect expenses for the fourth quarter of 2009 to approximate the levels of spending during the three-months ended September 30, 2009, and full-year 2009 expenses to be significantly below the spending levels of recent fiscal years which included higher levels of research and development activities.

      At September 30, 2009, we had cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash and investments, of approximately $39.9 million, compared to approximately $56.8 million at December 31, 2008. In March 2009 we repaid the $7.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our credit facility, which accounted for more than 40 percent of this reduction. At September 30, 2009, we reported approximately $2.9 million of restricted cash and investments in current assets associated with monies placed in a trust account in connection with severance obligations under our Management Transition Plan. At September 30, 2009 and December 2008, we reported $2.0 million of restricted cash and investments with non-current assets which represents the portion of our investment portfolio pledged as collateral to secure a letter of credit which serves as the security deposit on a building lease that expires November 2010. Also at December 31, 2008, we reported restricted cash and investments with current assets of $7.0 million representing the portion of our investment portfolio pledged as collateral for outstanding borrowings against our credit facility. These outstanding bank borrowings were fully repaid in March 2009 and the corresponding restricted investments reduced. We do not consider our restricted cash and investments a current source of additional liquidity.

25

---

      As of September 30, 2009, our commitments under building leases, net of scheduled cost recoveries under sublease agreements, were significantly lower than our net commitments reported as of December 31, 2008 due to the additional sublease agreement entered into and expanded during 2009. As of September 30, 2009, we had net future minimum commitments under non-cancellable building leases totaling approximately $816,000, payable in varying amounts through November 2010 (See Note 7 of Notes to our Condensed Financial Statements in Item 1), compared to $2.5 million as of December 31, 2008.

      Operating Activities. Net cash used in operating activities was $9.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Net cash used in operating activities during this period was primarily used to fund costs associated with our response to a proxy fight and hostile tender offer, winding down of clinical research and development activities, including non-clinical studies and clinical trials performed by third parties, and legal and advisory fees associated with our review of strategic merger and acquisition opportunities, negotiating the definitive merger agreement with MediciNova, and defending the class action lawsuit in connection with the proposed MediciNova merger.

      Investing and Financing Activities . Net cash provided by investing activities and used in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $42.3 million and $7.0 million, respectively. The cash provided by investing activities consisted primarily of sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities, net of purchases, and a net decrease in restricted cash and investments of approximately $4.1 million. This reduction in restricted cash and investments resulted from the release of $7.0 million in collateral in connection with the repayment of our bank borrowings, partially offset by monies placed in an irrevocable grantor trust in connection with severance obligations under the company’s Management Transition Plan, less subsequent distributions. The cash used in financing activities primarily represented the repayment of our outstanding bank borrowings.

      We anticipate that our existing capital resources as of September 30, 2009, after considering our anticipated operating and transaction costs, will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least 12 months in the event that the proposed definitive merger agreement with MediciNova is not consummated. However, if stockholders do not approve the merger with MediciNova or we are unable to monetize our remaining assets or reduce our remaining building lease obligations, we may not be able to deliver value to our stockholders at or above our net cash assets at September 30, 2009, less wind up costs. Our ability to return capital to stockholders in the event that the proposed definitive merger agreement with MediciNova is not consummated, will depend on many factors, including:

• how successful, if at all, we are in selling assets, including our AV411 drug development program, or entering into another agreement to sell the company;
   
• the costs involved in winding up our remaining ongoing research and development activities;
   
• the costs involved in filing, prosecuting and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights;
   
• the costs involved in defending the class action lawsuit related to the proposed merger with MediciNova;
   
• the costs involved with winding up any corporate obligations associated with the proposed merger with MediciNova or a plan of dissolution; and
   
• other factors which may not be within our control.

26

---

Risks Related to Our Business

We are in the process of seeking stockholder approval of the proposed acquisition of Avigen by MediciNova, which if the acquisition does not occur, we will have expended significant resources for no benefit, and will have delayed a dissolution of Avigen.

      We are pursuing the acquisition of the company by MediciNova, Inc., which has required that we incur significant legal and other costs. If either our stockholders, or the MediciNova stockholders do no approve the merger, then the merger will not occur, and we will need to pursue a dissolution of Avigen. If this were to occur, we would have incurred significant merger-related costs, as well as continued operating costs, that we would not have incurred if we had pursued a dissolution of the company. Further, we will need to hold an annual meeting of our stockholders as soon as possible if the acquisition does not occur, which will also require that we incur additional costs. If all of this were to occur, we will have less cash to return to stockholders than we believe we will have if the merger with MediciNova is consummated.

We are in the process of pursuing a monetization of our AV411 product in the event that we are not able to complete the proposed merger with MediciNova, which we may not be able to do on terms we believe we should be able to obtain for this product

      We are pursuing the sale of our AV411 product in the event that we are not able to complete the proposed merger with MediciNova. We believe that this product has substantial value, but given the current economic climate, we may not be able to find a buyer that is willing to pay what we believe is the fair value for AV411. If we are not able to obtain significant value for the sale of AV411, we will not be able to return to our stockholders the value that we believe we should be able to obtain for AV411.

We are in the process of pursuing a monetization of our rights under our Genzyme agreement in the event that we are not able to complete the proposed merger with MediciNova, which we may not be able to do on terms we believe we should be able to obtain

      We are pursuing discussions with Genzyme to have Genzyme purchase from Avigen the rights under our existing agreement with Genzyme or may seek in the alternative to sell these rights to another party in the event that the merger with MediciNova does not occur. We believe that these rights have substantial value, but we may not be able to find a buyer that is willing to pay what we believe is the fair value for these rights, and Genzyme may not be willing to purchase these rights for the value that we believe they are worth. If we are not able to monetize these rights or obtain value for these rights on the terms that we believe they are worth in the event that we are not able to complete the proposed merger, we will not be able to return to our stockholders the value that we believe we should be able to obtain for these rights.

We will incur costs as we pursue the completion of the proposed merger with MediciNova or possible dissolution of Avigen, which may be more than we expect, which could result in a return to Avigen stockholders of less than we expect

      We will continue to incur operating costs as the company pursues the completion of the proposed merger or, if the merger is not completed, dissolution of the company. We are being very frugal with respect to the costs we are incurring, but we will need to continue to incur costs of operations. We have incurred costs in negotiations with MediciNova regarding the proposed merger and will continue to incur substantial costs in seeking stockholder approval and defending a law suit filed against us relating to the proposed merger. If the proposed merger is not completed and, as a result, we pursue a dissolution, we would need to solicit stockholder approval of such a dissolution, which would take time and we would incur costs in such a solicitation. If these costs are more than we expect, we will decrease the amount that we believe we would be able to return to our stockholders.

Other persons may assert rights to our proprietary technology, which could be costly to contest or settle

      Third parties may assert patent or other intellectual property infringement claims against us with respect to our products, technologies or other matters. Any claims against us, with or without merit, as well as claims initiated by us against third parties, can be time-consuming and expensive to defend or prosecute and resolve. There may be third-party patents and other intellectual property relevant to our products and technology which are not known to us. We have not been accused of infringing any third party's patent rights or other intellectual property, but we cannot assure you that litigation asserting claims will not be initiated, that we would prevail in any litigation, or that we would be able to obtain any necessary licenses on reasonable terms, if at all. If our competitors prepare and file patent applications in the United States that claim technology also claimed by Avigen, we may have to participate in interference proceedings declared by the Patent and Trademark Office to determine priority of invention, which could result in substantial cost to us, even if the outcome is favorable to us. In addition, to the extent outside collaborators apply technological information developed independently by them or by others to our product development programs or apply our technologies to other projects, disputes may arise as to the ownership of proprietary rights to these technologies.

27

---

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

      As of September 30, 2009, in order to increase the liquidity of our investment portfolio, we sold all of our outstanding available-for-sale marketable securities and invested all of our excess funds in money market funds or cash accounts. As a result, as of September 30, 2009, we do not have any material exposure to fair value fluctuations of our investment portfolio due to market risk, compared to our estimated exposure of $341,000 as reported in our market risk disclosures set forth in Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the SEC on March 16, 2009. The market risk exposure associated with our investment in marketable securities at December 31, 2009 was deemed to be immaterial and was based on the potential impact if market interest rates were to increase by 100 basis points, or 1%, from their December 31, 2008 levels.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

      Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures . With the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)), as of September 30, 2009. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure, at a reasonable assurance level, that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and instructions for such reports.

      Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting . There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

      Not applicable.

28

---

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

      On August 24, 2009, The Pennsylvania Avenue Funds filed a complaint in California Superior Court for Alameda County entitled The Pennsylvania Avenue Funds, v. Avigen, Inc., et al., Case No. RG09470224. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on or about October 15, 2009. Plaintiff alleges that it is an Avigen stockholder and asserts claims on behalf of a purported class of all public stockholders of Avigen. Named as defendants in the amended complaint are Avigen, all of the current members of Avigen’s board of directors and MediciNova, Inc. Plaintiff alleges that the Merger resulted from an unfair process; that the consideration offered in the Merger is inadequate in light of Avigen’s prospects, liquidation value, and potential alternative transactions; and that the public disclosures in connection with the Merger are inadequate. Plaintiff asserts claims against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duties of good faith, loyalty, fair dealing and due care; against MediciNova for aiding and abetting the individual defendants’ breaches of fiduciary duty; and against all defendants for breach of a fiduciary duty of disclosure. Plaintiff seeks a judgment determining that the action is a proper class action and that plaintiff is a proper class representative, and awarding plaintiff and the purported class damages, attorney’s fees, costs and interest .

Item 1A. Risk Factors

      We include in Part I, Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risks Related to Our Business” a description of risk factors related to our business in order to enable readers to assess, and be appropriately apprised of, many of the risks and uncertainties applicable to the forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We do not claim that the risks and uncertainties set forth in that section are all of the risks and uncertainties facing our business, but do believe that they reflect the more important ones.

      In March 2009, we announced that we had discontinued strategic merger discussions and intended to develop a plan of dissolution. In June 2009, we announced that we had reached an understanding with MediciNova, Inc. on key terms for a proposed acquisition of Avigen by MediciNova . On August 20, 2009, we entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which MediciNova’s wholly-owned subsidiary will merge with and into Avigen. The completion of the transaction will permit the combination of the companies’ broad neurological clinical development programs based on ibudilast (Avigen’s AV411 and MediciNova’s MN-166). We believe this has significantly changed our risk profile, including the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the SEC on March 16, 2009. The risks relating to our business now relate primarily to preserving the value, and monetizing our assets as we seek to complete the proposed merger with MediciNova or sell or dissolve the company. We have updated these risk factors in Part 1, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q under the caption “Risks Related to Our Business” to take into account these recent developments.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

      None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

      None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

      None.

29

---

Item 5. Other Information

      On November 9, 2009, Avigen amended its Management Transition Plan (the “Plan”) to cause the Plan to terminate in connection with the acquisition of Avigen by MediciNova, Inc., and to cause the scheduled payouts under the Plan to occur upon termination or shortly thereafter, except to the extent necessary to delay payouts to avoid adverse tax consequences.

Item 6. Exhibits

      See the Exhibit Index which follows the signature page of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

           AVIGEN, INC.

Date: November 9, 2009		By:	/s/ ANDREW A. SAUTER
			Andrew A. Sauter
			Chief Executive Officer, President and
			Chief Financial Officer

30

---

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number		Exhibits
2	.1(5)		Assignment Agreement, dated December 19, 2005, by and between Genzyme Corporation and Avigen
2	.2(10)		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 20, 2008, by and among MediciNova, Inc., Absolute Merger, Inc. and Avigen, Inc.
2	.2(7)		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated December 17, 2008, by and between Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Baxter International Inc., and Baxter Healthcare S.A. (collectively “Baxter”) and Avigen
3	.1(8)		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
3	.1.1(2)		Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation
3	.1.2(3)		Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation
3	.1.3(8)		Certificate of Designation
3	.2(6)		Restated Bylaws of the Registrant
4	.1(1)		Specimen Common Stock Certificate
4	.2(9)		Rights Agreement dated as of November 21, 2008, by and between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Co. LLC
4	.3(8)		Form of Right Certificate
4	.3(10)		Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated August 20, 2008, by and between Avigen, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Co. LLC
10	.1(10)		Amendment to Management Transition Plan, effective as of August 20, 2009
10	.2		Amendment to Management Transition Plan, effective as of November [ ], 2009
31	.1		CEO Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
31	.2		CFO Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
32	.1(4)		Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350)

____________________
 

(1)		Filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-03220) and incorporated herein by reference.
(2)		Incorporated by reference from such document filed with the SEC as an exhibit to Avigen’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2000, as filed with the SEC on February 13, 2001 (Commission File No. 000-28272).
(3)		Incorporated by reference from such document filed as an exhibit to Avigen’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 26, 2007 (Commission File No. 000-28272).
(4)		This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Avigen under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
(5)		Incorporated by reference from such document filed with the SEC as an exhibit to Avigen’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the SEC on March 16, 2006 (Commission File No. 000-28272). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a grant of confidential treatment.

31

---

(6)		Incorporated by reference from such document filed with the SEC as an exhibit to Avigen’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the SEC on November 8, 2007 (Commission File No. 000-28272).
(7)		Incorporated by reference from such document filed with the SEC as an exhibit to Avigen’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the SEC on March 16, 2009 (Commission File No. 000-28272). Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to request for confidential treatment.
(8)		Incorporated by reference from such document filed as an exhibit to Avigen’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 24, 2008 (Commission File No. 000-28272).
(9)		Incorporated by reference from such document filed as an exhibit to Avigen’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on November 24, 2008 (Commission File No. 000-28272).
(10)		Incorporated by reference from such document filed as an exhibit to Avigen’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 25, 2009 (Commission File No. 000-28272).

32

---

Avigen (MM) (NASDAQ:AVGN)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Out 2024 até Nov 2024

Avigen (MM) (NASDAQ:AVGN)
Gráfico Histórico do Ativo
De Nov 2023 até Nov 2024